2018_01_08 M_ Summons CommentsFrom: Mary Summons [mailto:mary48184@yahoo.com]
Sent: Monday, January 08, 2018 9:41 AM
To: Christopher Bradbury; Mayor Paul S. Rosenberg; Susan R. Epstein; David M. Heiser; Jason A. Klein;
j.rednick@verizon.net
Subject: Draft DEIS Scoping Outline for 900 King Street
Dear Honorable Mayor Rosenberg and Honorable Members of the Board of Trustees,
I am a resident homeowner in The Arbors in Rye Brook and am writing in regards to the
proposed project at 900 King Street. Similar to my neighborhood’s Board of Directors, I have a
number of concerns on the Draft DEIS Scoping Outline presented by the applicant – the full
array of potential effects and mitigation measures must be accurately identified, measured and
evaluated, yet the current Draft DEIS Scoping Outline fails to adequately do so. I urge you to
adopt revisions to the Outline requiring greater analysis of mitigation measures, as well as
alternatives to this project as currently proposed. In particular, I encourage you to require
increased analysis of alternatives to the Project that will incorporate the following:
1. Less bulk, density, and scale: The existing structure at 900 King Street is composed of
215,000 square feet, while the numerous proposed structures will have a combined total gross
floor area of 445,000 square feet, more than double the scale of the existing structure.
Moreover, the applicant seeks to build 16 units per acre, which is more than double the density
of The Arbors. Also, the existing maximum gross floor area for the site is 9,000 square feet per
acre. The applicant seeks to nearly triple this with a project of 25,000 square feet per acre.
Alternatives that do not increase the existing square footage should be considered, as well as
alternatives that do not change the existing setbacks affecting The Arbors.
2. Less impact on ground disturbance and wetlands: The applicant admits that 13.17 acres
of the 17.77 acre site, or 74% of the site, will be disturbed. Moreover, the Village Planner
acknowledges that the “significant grade alterations” may affect the functionality (and hydrology)
of two of the four wetlands on the site. Alternatives need to be considered wherein none of the
existing wetlands are affected, with significantly less ground disturbance.
3. Less Impact on Vegetation: The applicant seeks to remove at least 209 trees from the
property, as well as to conduct grading wherein at least 9,000 cubic yards of fill would have to
be brought to the site, resulting in deleterious erosion impacts. Alternatives need to be
considered where extensive tree removal and extensive grading is not required.
4. Alternatives to setting the age restriction at 55 years: The applicant has never explained
the economic rationale or other basis for reducing the existing age restriction on senior living
facilities from age 62 to age 55. Obviously, a younger population will lead to increased traffic
and increased use of the schools. In present times age 55 is clearly not considered Senior, and
there are many families now with a 55 year-old parent and school-aged children.
5. Alternatives that will have less impact on local traffic: As a resident of The Arbors, I am
very concerned about the existing levels of traffic on King Street and along Arbor Drive, a
private road. A development of 269 units, along with the various workers to be employed in
functions such as food service, recreation, and care of residents with memory related
conditions, will obviously lead to greater traffic congestion along King Street, along Arbor Drive,
and near the Blind Brook MS/HS, Fire Station, and Village Hall. Alternatives need to be
considered that will generate less traffic and which will not negatively impact the existing traffic
flow that The Arbors experiences.
6. Alternatives that do not require demolition and a massive construction project: Clearly,
demolition and construction in such close proximity to the BBMS/HS campus will have a
negative impact on not only The Arbors, but on the students, the staff and the educational
process. Consideration should be given to the alternative of repurposing the current building for
the residential uses planned by the applicant. Please note that in New York City and other
locations, numerous venerable office buildings have been converted into residential uses.
Other important areas of concern include:
a. The need for opening The Arbors’ emergency access road to outgoing cars during the entire
construction period to adequately ensure the safety and well-being of Arbors residents at all
times. This is of particular concern to me as a homeowner whose property backs up to the
emergency access road.
b. The need for a construction road other than Arbor Drive.
c. The need for more parking both at The Arbors and at the new facility.
d. Information regarding how solid waste disposal will be handled, either privately or at a cost to
the Village.
e. Keeping the overall height of the structure in keeping with other buildings in Rye Brook.
f. The rise in transient workers near the school could be dangerous for the children.
g. Will either or both of the two presently installed electrical boxes on Arbor Drive have to be
moved, and, if so, what would the new location be?
h. During the construction period, what will be done to ensure the safety of middle and high
school children as they walk around and on Arbor Drive to get to and from school?
i. What will be the cost to the Village of emergency vehicles necessary for the additional police
and fire officers that will be required as a result of the increased population?
j. What safety precautions will be necessary during blasting, and will they be sufficient, due to
the proximity of the Tennessee Gas lines?
k. What is the plan to ensure that there is no interruption of utility services to The Arbors
residents during construction, as all utility lines come in through King Street?
l. If this lowers the home values in The Arbors, is that factored in to the revenue calculations
presented by the developer in their proposal?
m. Blasting and asbestos removal are needed and construction is expected to last three years;
what is the plan to protect Arbors residents and school children and faculty?
n. Where will the overflow parking for the school go at such times as meet-the-teacher night,
soccer/sports tournaments, as town residents use 900 King Street as an overflow parking lot
and there are hundreds of cars parked there for these events?
o. Does the traffic study take into account that in the years when 900 King Street was fully
occupied and The Arbors had fewer cars?
The Arbors represents a significant portion of the population in Rye Brook, and I thank the
Village in advance for taking our concerns seriously and for acting in the best interest of so
many Rye Brook citizens.
Respectfully,
Mary E. Summons
69 Greenway Ln
The Arbors