HomeMy WebLinkAbout12613z
PERMIT # 2 DATE: t Z S EXP:
SECTION
TYPE OF WORK
JOB LOCATION
OWNER 4rtrl
2
CONTRACTOR
EST. COST 3 �-- FEE r
VCO # C% - FEAl I DATE 1 v�opQ
TCO # FEE DATE
INSPECTION RECORD
DATE
FOOTING
FOUNDATION
FRAMING
RGH FR
AMING
INSP
--
INSULATION �
PLUMBING
RGH PLUMBING
GAS ----�
SPRINKLER
ELECTRIC
LOW -VOLT 0
ALARM
AS BUILT
FINAL x
-��c —cvio6�y
�-7&JoAgAlit * b4i �ti7
OTHER APPROVALS
1
I�
VILLAG*a ' RYE BROOK
WESTCHESTER COUNTY, NEW YORK
NO: 22-110
9911
k
Certificate of ®ccupaucp
'This is to certify that j g/? Y/n4e r)T e Hro yo /`fin e
of, Rye , kiuok, /\j , having duly filed an application on
1 CL kyCz r y ""T'. 20 cQa requesting a Certificate of Occupancy for the premises known as,
C�—7 I ln�i Paad , Rye Brook,NY, located in a R_/� Zoning
District and shown on the most current Tax Map as Section: 1. J.(0(Q Block: Lot: —
and having fully complied with the requirements of the Building Code and the Zoning Ordinance under Building
Permit No. A5?(Q , issued 197, such authority and permission is hereby granted
to the property owner to lawfully occupy or use said premises or building or part thereof listed under the following
New York State Classifications, Use: �� C1�if` /'Y)/ /V Construction:
for the following purposes: �� ___aae
br-eezeU-)CIL4 L'to Qr,6 Anny-
Subject to all the privileges, requirements, limitations, and conditions prescribed by law, and subject also to the
following:
This certificate does not in any way relieve the owners or any person or persons in possession or control of the premises,
building,or any part thereof from obtaining such other permits or licenses as may be prescribed by law for the uses or purposes
for which the building or premises is designed or intended. Furthermore, it does not relieve such owners or persons from
complying with any lawful order issued with the object of maintaining the premises or building in a safe and lawful condition.
No changes or rearrangement in the structural parts of the building or in the exit facilities shall be made,and no enlargement,
whether by extending on any side or by increasing in height shalli be rpade,nor shall the building be moved from one location
to another until a permit to accomplish such change has been obt i e e 'n�Da�te:
Building Inspector,Village of Rye Brook: AUG 2�22
R > For office use only:
D �/ BUILDII + - EY,:_ZTMENT
PERMIT# law
VILL`AQIE OF RYE Bj� OK ISSUED: '7
FEB - 4 2022 8 KING STREi4 j'kYE BROOK,NEW YoRK 10573 DATE: — - o?
(9;14)939 0
w � FEE: PAID
VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK w .ry�l�iroo�C:org
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
,ArrLICATION FOR ERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY, CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE,
AND CERTIFICATION OF FINAL COSTS
TO BE SUBMITTED ONLY UPON COMPLETION OF ALL WORK, AND PRIOR TO THE FINAL INSPECTION
rrrtstssssssrss►rststtrttsssssssrr/s�srrsrrrrrttttssssrss srsassrsrsstrststsrrsrstssssssr(st�srr+sttststsstssssssssssrssrrststtr
Address: 04 wl(f
Occupancy/Use: S.sG� Parcel ID#: Zone:
Owner: f kg 2a�p r Address:
P.E./R.A. or Contractor: u1NGc.W C-kit-c.rr y, Address:
Person in responsible charge: Address:
Application is hereby made and submitted to the wilding Inspector of the Village of Rye Brook for the issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy/Certificate of Compliance for the structure/construction/alteration herein mentioned in accordance
with law:
STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER as:
VI pj Bkq d,t being duly sworn,deposes and says that he/she resides at + 9 D b6l S y..d /" #
(Print Name of Applic t) (No.and Street)
in ,in the County of W IPI in the State of- that
(City/Town/Village)
he/she has supervised the work at the location indicated above,and that the actual total cost of the work,including all site improvements,
labor,materials,scaffolding,fixed equipment,professional fees,and including the monetary value of any materials and labor which may
have been donated gratis was:$ ?j� ontf) ,
for the construction or alteration of: /�'1�/ GL7TCjC�ie� G7D�/'G�Gi-e W �2r�,:ze wQ t� t of
Deponent further states that he/she has examined the approved plans of the structure/work herein referred to for which a Certificate of
Occupancy/Compliance is sought,and that to the best of his/her knowledge and belief,the structure/work has been erected/completed in
accordance with the approved plans and any amendments thereto except in so far as variations therefore have been legally authorized,and
as erected/completed complies with the laws governing building construction.Deponent further understands that it shall be unlawful for an
owner to use or permit the use of any building or premises or part thereof hereafter created,erected,changed,converted or enlarged,wholly
or partly,in its use or structure until a Certificate of Occupancy or Certificate of Compliance shall have been duly issued by the Building
Inspector as per§250-10.A.of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook.
fk
Sworn to before me this � Sworn to before me this
day of , 20�� day of -AfuuJ t , 20 12
I
ature of Property Owner Signatur&QLAfplicant
Le Ll
Print Name of Property Owne Print Name of Applicant
IA—/
�Z
Notaryku6lic RITA J.TINO
Notary Public,State of New York A A M SA AZAR
No.02T16045496 NOTARY PUBLIC,STATE OF NEW YORK
Oualified in Westchester County Registration No.OISA6365173 1r12;2021
Commission Expires July 31,2 Qualified in Westchester County
Commission Expires 10-02-2025
�E 4RO
1982 BUILDING DEPARTMENT
❑B DING INSPECTOR
ASSISTANT BUILDING INSPECTOR VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK
❑CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER 938 KING STREET . RYE BROOK,NY 10573
(914) 939-0668 FAx (914) 939-5801
www ryebrook.org
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INSPECTION REPORT - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
ADDRESS : w^�\\ ' �'' v DATE:
PERMIT# ISSUED: �` SECT: BLOCK: LOT:
LOCATION: 2n �) QK- � % -Zst OCCUPANCY:
❑ VIOLATION NOTED THE WORK IS... ACCEPTED ❑ REJECTED/REINSPECTION
❑ SITE INSPECTION REQUIRED
❑ FOOTING
❑ FOOTING DRAINAGE
❑ FOUNDATION
❑ UNDERGROUND PLUMBING NOTES ON INSPECTION:
❑ ROUGH PLUMBING
❑ ROUGH FRAMING
❑ INSULATION )))
❑ NATURAL GAS \ C��c C
❑ L.P. GAS
❑ FUEL TANK
❑ FIRE SPRINKLER
❑ FINAL PLUMBING
❑ CROSS CONNECTION
FINAL
❑ OTHER
QyE BRC�uk
1.
1932 BUILDING DEPARTMENT
❑BUILDING INSPECTOR
ASSISTANT BUILDING INSPECTOR VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK
CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER 938 KING STREET • RYE BROOK,NY 10573
(914) 939-0668 FAX (914) 939-5801
www ryebrook.org
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INSPECTION REPORT - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
ADDRESS ' �a Vtcp I V DATE: co I-L9 1-22—
PERMIT# , v ISSUED:
ECT: BLOCK: t LOT:—
LOCATION: "" �' � OCCUPANCY:
❑ VIOLATION NOTED THE WORK IS... [��- CCEPTED ❑ REJECTED/REINSPECTION
SITE INSPECTION ram' REQUIRED
❑ FOOTING
❑ FOOTING DRAINAGE
❑ FOUNDATION
❑ UNDERGROUND PLUMBING NOTES ON INSPECTION:
❑ ROUGH PLUMBING
❑ ROUGH FRAMING
❑ INSULATION �f
❑ NATURAL GAS
❑ L.P. GAS
❑ FUEL TANK
❑ FIRE SPRINKLER
❑ FINAL PLUMBING
❑ CROSS CONNECTION
L
OTHER
�QyE BRC�j/r
o �m
1982 BUILDING DEPARTMENT
❑BUILDING INSPECTOR
ASSISTANT BUILDING INSPECTOR VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK
❑CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER 938 KING STREET • RYE BROOK,NY 10573
(914) 939-0668 FAx (914) 939-5801
www.ryebrook.org
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INSPECTION REPORT - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
ADDRESS : V 1 1 1 \L ✓ DATE:—�\tS t Z 072-,
PERMIT# ,�6 ISSUED: I " $CT' -3 J BLOCK: t LOT:
LOCATION: \ �� �`n 10
OCCUPANCY:
❑ VIOLATION NOTED THE WORK IS... ❑ ACCEPTED ] REJECTED/ REINSPECTION
❑ SITE INSPECTION / REQUIRED
❑ FOOTING
❑ FOOTING DRAINAGE
❑ FOUNDATION
❑ UNDERGROUND PLUMBING NOTES ON INSPECTION:
❑ ROUGH PLUMBING
❑ ROUGH FRAMING
❑ INSULATION
❑ NATURAL GAS
❑ FUEL TANK
❑ FIRE SPRINKLER -�W 0 c1S1 \ owe
❑ FINAL PLUMBING
❑ CROSS CONNECTION t
❑ FINAL L�•e 1 S�` lOC?� C V C.+IY ' W0,, 1
❑ OTHER
r n t
ks, C
. QyE 4RC�k.
• �9b2 BUILDING DEPARTMENT
❑BUILDING INSPECTOR
ASSISTANT BUILDING INSPECTOR VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK
❑CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER 938 KING STREET • RYE BROOK,NY 10573
(914) 939-0668 FAx (914) 939-5801
www.ryebrook.org
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INSPECTION REPORT - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
ADDRESS: �� 1 1 �► �/ DATE:t""Zt '--'(- ' � ' y��
Z2 - r �
PERMIT# ISSUED: SECT: " 4LOCK: I LOT:
LOCATION: OCCUPANCY: S
❑ VIOLATION NOTED THE WORK IS...� ACCEPTED ElREJECTED/REINSP�ON
Q
❑ SITE INSPECTION f REQUIRE
❑ FOOTING
❑ FOOTING DRAINAGE ( �f a-1 G
❑ FOUNDATION 2 �
❑ UNDERGROUND PLUMBING NOTES ON INSPECTION:
ROUGH PLUMBING
0 ROUGH FRAMING
❑ INSULATION
�s NATURAL GAS
p L.P. GASCk—
❑ FUEL TANK
❑ FIRE SPRINKLER
❑ FINAL PLUMBING
❑ CROSS CONNECTION
❑ FINAL
❑ OTHER
s
r
s:
N M
N N s
N o N w
w W
E A W 00 W v.
W a 9400ON
O
7
�
00
N � z t
'T
M U u
lob
LOW, 80 CIO
M z z V } z
v, a p < O
rl Q w
Ln
CIN
00
o
V a o zz
J Q
if
f..i 42"tLt -3tc4;oil 4.lw$44;4wt 4 4=UCwt (;4+46.C=4 C;i;411,AUtwt;41;t;t;4 fi;4; cw(6:6fi;C;
BUILDING DEPARTMENT JUL 15 2022
ID
VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK L�
938 KING STREET RYE BRoaK,NY 10573 VI LLHGE OF RYE BROOK
(914)939-0668 BUILDING DEPARTMENT
WWW ftook.org
ELECTRICAL PERMIT APPLICATION
Westchester County Master Electricians License Required
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY BP#: o�C,� �<l�/��57) EP#: c--N
Approval Date: AL Permit Fee: $ ZI-5-0—ICIL
Approval Signature: Other:
Application dated, 10 711 S1 Z Z is hereby made to the Building Inspector of the Village of Rye Brook NY,for the issuance of
a Permit to install and/or remove electrical equipment,wiring, fixtures, or to perform other high or low voltage electrical work as per
the detailed statement described below. By signing this document, the applicant & property owner agree that all electrical work
performed will be in conformance with all applicable Federal,State,County and Local Codes. //
1.Address: Z 7 v.J I C ^/ �� SBL: ���i 66-'�-S0 Zone: Q
2.Property Owner:JU4t.1 V,CEAITE -UDe<,vc 1 ENELd N')6 Address: 27 j iL Tbd P-b P J $Z ooe t.1 J
Phone#(914) 34 b-Z SZ(, Cell#: email: \JC P PQ,O E N 67 . N y C
3.Master Electrician: Jo P_Et C au E r—i S C4 S2c 2>A Address: i g 0 E C C S T E- L Z Z -SLCC P/ WO L1a,) 1J
Lic.#: 18 7ci Phone#:( 14)8,37 9 05- Cell#:fj 14)f-31`t E')5 email: I C LOO D. COM
Company Name: HATEM ELECTRIC Address: I ff DE;L( ST 'FL2 2 -5LEEN F401-0-J NY I0,E-q
4.Proposed Electrical Work/Fixture Count:
LfC'7eLI?1TjOrJ 2ND :r-,,AZ
5.31 Party Electrical Inspection Agency: i 5
*********************************************************************************************************
STATE OF NEW YORK,COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER ) as:
JOECrir Lk)C IZ-TA S C.AQ��eA,being duly swom,deposes and states that he/she is the applicant above named,and does further
(print name of individual signing as the applicant)
state that(s)he is the legal owner of the property to which this application pertains,or that(s)he is the EL6CICAL GoN TV-ACTo 2
for the legal owner and is duly authorized to make and file this application. (indicate architect,contractor,agent,attorney,etc.)
The undersigned further states that all statements contained herein are true to the best of his/her knowledge and belief,and that any work
performed,or use conducted at the above captioned property will be in conformance with the details as set forth and contained in this
application and in any accompanying approved plans and specifications,as well as in accordance with the New York State Uniform Fire
Prevention&Building Code,the Code of the Village of Rye Brook and all other applicable laws,ordinances,and regulations.
Sworn to before me this Sworn to fore me this
day of ,20 day of \ ,20
Signature of Property Owner a of Applic
�2&t f�c—iz-as �dalz�e�
Print Name of Property Owner Pyt$t�Name of Applic t -
Notary Public Notary PulkgRI MELILLO
Notary Public,State of New York
No.01ME6160063
Qualified In Westchester County
Commission Expires January 29,20022
STATE WIDE INSPECTION SERVICES, INC.
Service With lnlegri�y
0:0 • •
SWIS JOB APPLICATION0. •
Office Use Elect. Permit# Y Date i 2 2-
Bldg Permit# 7
Sq Ft
Plumbing Permit#
Final Certificate#
City/Village k Zip Building Dept. County (1
Address Cross Street Section Block FLot
Owner Name/Address(If different than above) } ' i GEi.f r= ��Vr) T ,�) � rU Contact Number = '� :4Z -
❑Basement ❑ 1st Fl. ❑2nd Fl. ❑3rd Fl. ❑More Than 3 Fl. ❑Garage ❑Attic ❑Outside ❑Residential ❑Commercial
Receptacles Special Recept GFCI AFCI Switches Dimmers Smoke Alarms C/0 Detector Hood Trash Compact
Amt Amps
Range(s) Cooktop(s) Oven(s) Dishwashers Refrigerator Disposal Microwave Luminaires Generator Transfer Switch
SERVICE
Amperage #Panels 1P 3P # Meters #Disconnect ❑Underground ❑ New ❑ Reconnect ❑ Repair
❑Overhead ❑ Upgrade ❑ Disconnect
Utility ID# ❑Con Ed ❑ NYSEG ❑Central Hudson ❑ Orange/Rockland
PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEM
PV Modules Inverters AC Disconnect Junction Box Combiner Box Load Center PV Monitor Energy Storage System DC Disconnect
Legalization ❑ Safety Inspection ❑Consultation
la
J U L 1 5 2022
VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK
BUILDING DEPARTMENT I
This application is valid for one(1)year from the date received by SWIS.This application is intended to cover the above listed items to be inspected,if at any time of inspection additional items have been installed,you are
authorized to make the inspection and adjust the fee for the additional items inspected.The applicant declares that there is no open applications for the above address with any other inspection company.The applicant,
owner or authorized agent agrees to all the above terms and conditions as set forth for the application.
Email Address h iA-rC'J`-C—L&CTE I C L !C-_ Name -re(:. �4Q E C-'-Z S S it
License# ; Date r7)i K Signature
Address IX:a �� T L—e City/State -�{ _ _i1 Zip Code pS�/
Company i 1 F""-I E-LC=C i i; C Phone#;
State Wide Inspection Services
1080 Main Street
Fishkill, NY 12524
845 202-7224 Phone
914-219-1062 Fax
STATE WIDE INSPECTION SERVICES Email: office@swisny.com
Website: www.swisny.com
Service With Integrity
BY THIS CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE STATE WIDE INSPECTION SERVICES
CERTIFIES THAT:
Upon the application of: Upon Premises Owned by:
Matem Electric Juan Vicente Idrovo Tenelanda
Jorge Huertas Cabrera 27 Wilton Road
18 Dell Street- Floor 2 Rye Brook, NY 10573
Sleepy Hollow, NY 10591
Located at: 27 Wilton Road, Rye Brook, NY 10573
Section: Block: Lot: Electrical Permit Number: EP22-142
135.66 50
Certificate Number: 2022-4047 Building Permit Number: BP126
A visual inspection of the electrical system was conducted at the Residential occupancy described
below.The electrical system consisting of electrical devices and wiring is located in/on the premises
at: 27 Wilton Road, Rye Brook, NY 10573
The Second Floor Bedroom and Bathroom were inspected in accordance with the NYS and NFPA 70-
2017 and the detail of the installation,as set forth below,was found to be in compliance on the 21st
day of July 2022.
Name Quantity Rating Circuit Type
Receptacles 12
Switches 03
Luminaires 06
A Visual Inspection of existing conditions was performed on July 2155.2022 of the Second Floor
Bedrooms and Bathroom and Conforms to NFPA 70-2017 NEC. No Defects Were Noted.Officer: Frank J. Farina
This certificate may not be altered in any vray and is validated only by the presence of a seal at the location
indicated.This certificate is valid for%vork performed on the date of inspection only.
n CD N N
O
Ln
f, a in a p r.r
i} It W �
w CA
0-4
z
o z o .c
,rien
8 as
O Z o
Q w
O w �. ^ x F H
. z sa CA z
id O
mo
0N0 pq w
po M 00
ao �
�.,,� G..., z o V
µ � a U ►..
Z O
en cr.
Cn
s Ln
� z
Z 0-4 w
w
A y
� .�
5cy<
1
a A z z
, w
z $
a � z0
►- � w N F 8 rr
i V
z
QI ca a a � w = �
' �� � HIE
QSa� BUILDING DEPARTMENT
C VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK MAY 2 5 2022
v 938 KING STREET RYE BROOK NY 10573
C �o��,�y (914) -0668 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK
Now BUILDING DEPARTMENT
www.13�ehruok.org -- - - - --
PLUMBING PERMIT APPLICATION �Q
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY' B1' #: 'y 67 YN q: toC)
Approval Date: MAY 2 6\20P Permit Fee: $
Approval Signature: Other:
Disapproved: H::::�
(fees are non-refundable)
Application dated, 6'c)6'—w'�4 is hereby made to the Building Inspector of the Village of Rye Brook NY,for the issuance of
a Permit to install and/or remove Plumbing as per detailed statement described below.The applicant&property owner,by signing this
document agree that said plumbing work will be in conformance with all applicable Federal,State,County and Local Codes.
j-VIT
1.Address: �/�-�/ SBL: �l_ � Zone: �C7
2.Proposed Work: �(� ! Z� S�LlJYye� DZ /�' 1�.�"✓�
3.Property Owner: /l/ �� Address:
Phone#: Cell#: ql'4 3 L6 4XX email:
4.Master Plumber: .fCYl+tMYOD A/111i44,4A/ Address:
Lic. #: S/ d� Phone#: Cell#: 9/y-57Kawl'g' email: /r? %lf/4/yQJ 100 /}01>
Company Name: Address: /Lr WP /W /(J
INDICATE FIXTURES&LINES TO BE INSTALLED AS PER THE FOLLOWING SCHEDULE:
Location Water Urinals Drinking Sinks Showers I Bath Laundry Domestic Fire Sanitary Natural/ Other* Total
Closets Fountains Tubs Tubs Service Service Sewer LP Gas
Basement
1 st Floor
2nd Floor r I
Yd Floor I
4"Floor
5'Floor
Exterior
5.*List Other Equipment/Provide Details:
(Notarized Signatures Required Next 2 Pages)
-l-
8/12/2021 :+
STATE QF NEW YORK COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER ) as:
V� TI�Up ,,being duly sworn,deposes and states that he/she is the applicant above named,
(Print name of individual signing as the applicant)
and further states that(s)he is the legal owner of the property to which this application pertains,or that(s)he is the
for the legal owner and is duly authorized to make and file this application.
(indicate architect,contractor,agent,attorney,etc.)
That all statements contained herein are true to the best of his/her knowledge and belief,and that any work performed,or use
conducted at the above captioned property will be in conformance with the details as set forth and contained in this application
and in any accompanying approved plans and specifications,as well as in accordance with the New York State Uniform Fire
Prevention&Building Code, the Code of the Village of Rye Brook and all other applicable laws,ordinances and regulations.
Sworn to before me this Sworn to before me this O`er
day of ,20 Z� day of a ,20_a:�_
gna o operty Owner Signa a of Applicant
LCL-VyG fnW,0V,oZ>
Print Name of Property Owner Print Name of Applicant
o Public FNOTARYPUBLIC,
QUEZADA Notary Public S
Notary Public,State of New York
STATE OF NEW YORK No.01ME6160063
No.01OU6186064 Quallfled In Westchester CountyTCHESTER COUNTYes Apr l 28,202a Commission Expires January 29,20
This application must be properly completed in its entirety and must include the notarized signature(s) of
the legal owner(s) of the subject property, and the applicant of record in the spaces provided. Applications
not properly completed in its entirety and/or not properly signed shall be deemed null and void and will be
retuned to the applicant.
-2-
sir 2i202 r
[D
I �BUILDING DEPARTMENT
VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK K MAY 2 5 2022
938 KING STREET RYE BROOK,NY 10573
(914)939-0668 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK
NvNN-*N.rvehrtiilk.m-,_, ; BUILDING DEPARTMENT
AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE
VILLAGE CODE &216 • STORM SEWERS AND SANITARY SEWERS
THIS AFFIDAVIT MUST BEAR THE NOTARIZED SIGNATURE OF THE LEGAL PROPERTY OWNER AND BE SUBMITTED
ALONG WITH ANY BUILDING OR PLUMBING PERMIT APPLICATION. ANY BUILDING OR PLUMBING PERMIT
APPLICATION SUBMITTED WITHOUT THIS COMPLETED AND NOTARIZED FORM WILL BE RETURNED TO THE APPLICANT .
STATE OF NEW YORK,COUNTY OF WESTCH STER ) as:
residing at, � 1\ yly� �I-� �4 /v• l
I I'rint nanucl uu II\CI '
being duly sworn,deposes and states that(s)he is the applicant above named, and further states that(s)he is the
legal owner of the property to which this Affidavit of Compliance pertains at;
"- n Q:A \A e7, Py-) , Rye Brook,NY.
(Job,\d(fic",O
Further that all statements contained herein are true, and that to the best of his/her knowledge and belief,that
there are no known illegal cross-connections concerning either the storm sewer or sanitary sewer, and further
that there are no roof drains, sump pumps, or other prohibited stormwater or groundwater connections or sources
of inflow or infiltration of any kind into the sanitary sewer from the subject property in accordance with all State,
County and Village Codes.
V
(Siunaturc, `.' operty 0wri -)i
1-7
J u ctVN U i C_V t" -L J Ycv��
(I'mit Nana ou I'n,h., ,, MXr:rn.,ir
Sworn to before me this
day of_ --) , 20 rQ
IRMA CIUEZADA
NOTARY PUBLIC,STATE OF NEW YORK
Registration No.01 QU6186064
Qualified in WESTCHESTER COUNTY
Commission Expires
April 28.2024
a/12/2021
t
e
N 'n Ln l =
ci
a a Ln
0.0
IQ
o � W
_ u
Ln
o PLO
p W F � w
Z z g <
c w z r O
^ tH00
00 cn w t �
ON
I.—, U Z r
■ [�] ci C Z en
a Z
A � z � � O
~ ao c�
CY
w _
A" a Z z
� q N cf
^^� O zz > a H
W. z a
Z Q o s
U ~ a � U ^W '
O 'il F C Z
QI ca a ca w xa
ID
BUILDING DEPARTMENT J U N - 3 2022
VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK
938 KING STREET RYE BROOK,NY 10573 VILLAGE O� RYE BROOK
(914)99-Q668-'"; BUILDING DEPARTMENT
www. - tbrook.org
PLUMBING1G PERMIT APPLICATION --7/,,
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY BP#: d 94 / />5 7 PP#: '� ( VJ
Approval Date: .� > Permit Fee: $ /� /—
Approval Signature: Other:
Disapproved:
(fees are non-refundable)
**************************************************************************************************
Application dated,& 3 is hereby made to the Building Inspector of the Village of Rye Brook NY,for the issuance of
a Permit to install and/or remove Plumbing as per detailed statement described below.The applicant&property owner,by signing this
document agree that said plumbing work will be in conformance with all applicable Federal,State,County and Local Codes.
1.Address: SBL: /.j— 46 J Zone:Af-10
2.Proposed Work:
3.Property Owner: 1Z2oV0 Address: /.
Phone#: Cell#: email:
4.Master Plumber: Address: Cam'e2:F-��5% 3,6V Lz/O UY /OKDC/
Lic.#: /S t4' Phone#: Cell#: y�y S ` email: fl";12,'A44 (IOO/Y'��9fX� 40-�"W
Company Name: Address: Si 3k)'y GVA /0'Y /0604f
INDICATE FIXTURES&LINES TO BE INSTALLED AS PER THE FOLLOWING SCHEDULE:
Location Water Urinals Drinking Sinks Showers Bath Laundry Domestic Fire Sanitary Natural/ Other* Total
Closets Fountains Tubs Tubs Service Service Sewer LP Gas
Basement
1st Floor
2nd Floor
31 Floor
41 Floor
5m Floor
Exterior
5.*List Other EquipmenVProvide Details:
Ca/,Y2-0
(Notarized Signatures Required Next 2 Pages)
-1-
8/12rzo21
STATE OF NEW YORK,COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER ) as:
A.i-/-/)/C- ✓,>
0 ,being duly sworn,deposes and states that he/she is the applicant above named,
(print name of individual signing as the applicant)
and further states that(s)he is the legal owner of the property to which this application pertains,or that(s)he is the
OW/2e y, for the legal owner and is duly authorized to make and file this application.
(indicate architect,contractor,agent,attorney,etc.)
That all statements contained herein are true to the best of his/her knowledge and belief,and that any work performed,or use
conducted at the above captioned property will be in conformance with the details as set forth and contained in this application
and in any accompanying approved plans and specifications,as well as in accordance with the New York State Uniform Fire
Prevention&Building Code,the Code of the Village of Rye Brook and all other applicable laws,ordinances and regulations.
Sworn to before me this 2 Sworn to before me this
day of Aun e ,20 = day of 71, N ,20
Signature of Property Owner Signa of Applicant
Q
Print Name of Property Owne-r Pdqt Name of Applicant
ANA M SALAZAR
Notary -SATE OF NM PORK
Registration No.01SA6365173 Notary Pu�l1ARI MELILLO
Qualified in wcstchester County Notary Public,State of New York
Commission Expires 10.02-2025 No.O1ME6160063
Qualified In Westchester County
Commission Expires January 29.20�
This application must be properly completed in its entirety and must include the notarized signature(s) of
the legal owner(s)of the subject property, and the applicant of record in the spaces provided.Applications
not properly completed in its entirety and/or not properly signed shall be deemed null and void and will be
returned to the applicant.
-2-
8/12i2021
BUILDING MPARTMENT
VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK J U N — 3 2022
938 KING STWET RYE BROOK,NY 10573
(914).9 668, VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE
VILLAGE CODE §216 • STORM SEWERS AND SANITARY SEWERS
THIS AFFIDAVIT MIDST BEAR THE NOTARIZED SIGNATURE OF THE LEGAL PROPERTY OWNER AND BE SUBMITTED
ALONG WITH ANY BUILDING OR PLUMBING PERMIT APPLICATION. ANY BUILDING OR PLUMBING PERMIT
APPLICATION SUBMITTED WITHOUT THIS COMPLETED AND NOTARIZED FORM WILL BE RETURNED TO THE APPLICANT.
STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER ) as:
U. 4000 , residing at, 1 z L!/,'/td"7 p) (Ave B4O4 f Y rosr3
(Print name) (Address where you liv
being duly sworn, deposes and states that(s)he is the applicant above named, and further states that(s)he is the
legal owner of the property to which this Affidavit of Compliance pertains at;
?_)'--J o , Rye Brook,NY.
(Job Address)
Further that all statements contained herein are true, and that to the best of his/her knowledge and belief,that
there are no known illegal cross-connections concerning either the storm sewer or sanitary sewer,and further
that there are no roof drains, sump pumps, or other prohibited stormwater or groundwater connections or sources
of inflow or infiltration of any kind into the sanitary sewer from the subject property in accordance with all State,
County and Village Codes.
,O
gnature of Property Owner(s))
(Print Name of Property Owner(s))
Sworn to before me this 2
day of ,n P , 20 )9—_
(Notary Pub
ANA M SALAZAR
NOTARY PUBLIC.STATE OF NEW YORK
Registration No.01 SA6365173
Qualilicd in Westchester County -3-
Cummission Expires 10.02.2025
8/12/2021
VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK RECEIVED
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS APR 1 12022
RESOLUTION W14GE CLERK'S OFFICE
WHEREAS, application has been made to the Zoning Board by Juan Vincente Idrovo
Tenelanda (the "Applicant") for (1) a single side yard setback variance of 0.6 feet where the
minimum required single side yard setback is 10 feet pursuant to Village Code § 250-22.G(2)(a),
and (2) a rear yard setback variance of 10 feet where the minimum required rear yard setback is 30
feet pursuant to Village Code § 250-22.G(3), in connection with the proposed legalization of a one
car attached garage with breezeway and finished second floor constructed under Building Permit
#126 dated 4/12/1957, on property located at 27 Wilton Road, in an R-10 zoning district on the
west side of Wilton Road, approximately 100 feet from the intersection of Wilton Circle and
Wilton Road. Said premises being known and designated on the tax map of the Village of Rye
Brook as Parcel ID# 135.66-1-50; and
WHEREAS, a duly advertised public hearing was held on April 5, 2022, at which time all
those wishing to be heard were given such opportunity; and
WHEREAS, the public hearing was closed on April 5, 2022; and
WHEREAS, the proposed action is a Type II action pursuant to the New York State
Environmental Quality Review Act and accordingly, no further environmental review is required;
and
WHEREAS, the Board, from the application, after viewing the premises and neighborhood
concerned, and upon considering each of the factors set forth in Village Code § 250-13(G)(b)[2][a]-
[e] of the Rye Brook Code, finds with respect to the requested variances that:
1) The variances WILL NOT create an adverse impact to the character of the neighborhood;
2) The benefit the Applicants seek CANNOT be achieved through another method, feasible
for the Applicants to pursue, that does not require the variances;
3) The variances ARE substantial;
4) The variances WILL NOT create any adverse impacts to the physical or environmental
conditions of the neighborhood; and
5) The need for the variances IS NOT self-created; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the said application for (1) a single side
yard setback variance of 0.6 feet where the minimum required single side yard setback is 10 feet
pursuant to Village Code § 250-22.G(2)(a), and (2) a rear yard setback variance of 10 feet where the
minimum required rear yard setback is 30 feet pursuant to Village Code § 250-22.G(3), in connection
with the proposed legalization of a one car attached garage with breezeway and finished second floor
constructed under Building Permit #126 dated 4/12/1957, on property located at 27 Wilton Road is
hereby GRANTED on the following conditions:
1) No permit or certificate of occupancy shall be issued until the Applicants have paid in full
all application and consultant fees incurred by the Village in connection with the review
of this application.
2) The Applicant shall not construct any additional stories on top the one-story one-car
garage or increase the height of the one-story garage in anyway as shown on the plans last
revised on December 28, 2021.
3) If the garage is destroyed by more than 50%, such garage shall be reconstructed in
compliance with the Village's required setbacks, unless the Applicant obtains a variance
from the Village Zoning Board of Appeals.
Dated: April 5, 2022 Don Moscato
Mr. Don Moscato, Chairman
Mr. Moscato called the roll:
Steven Berger Voting: Excused
Glenn Brettschneider Voting: Aye
Jamie Schutzer Voting: Aye
Joel Simon Voting: Aye
Don Moscato Voting: Aye
4 Ayes
0 Nays
1 Excused
Py
. 19
VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK
MAYOR 938 King Street,Rye Brook,N.Y. 10573 ADMINISTRATOR
Paul S. Rosenbcrg (914)939-0668 ( hristopher 1. Bradburn
w•w waycbrook.org
TRUSTEES BUILDING& FIRE
Susan R.Epstein INSPECTOR
Stephanie J.Fischer \ltchacl J. Izzo
David A1.Heiser
Jason A.Fein
NOTICE OF HEARING ON APPLICATION
,0otice is hereby given that the undersigned has filed an application to appear before the Zoning Board of Appeals of
the Village of Rye Brook.
Application f1 22-008
Applicant: Juan Vincente Idrovo Tenelanda
27 Wilton Road
Rye Brook,New York 10573
Applicant Proposes to: Legalize one car attached garage with breezeway and finished 2nd floor
constructed under Building Permit#126 dated 4/12/1957.
kit the premises known as 27 Wilton Road in the Village of Rye Brook, New fork, situated on the west side of Wilton
Road,approximately 100 feet from the intersection of\Vilton Circle and Wilton Road,designated and shown on the most
current tax map as Parcel ID#135.66-1-50,the applicant does hereby request a variances) from the following applicable
section(s) of the Zoning Ordinance:
§ 250-22.G. (2) (a) The minimum required single side yard setback is 10 feet. The
applicant proposes to legalize the one car attached garage with
breezeway and finished 2nd floor constructed 9.4 feet from the side
property line.
Therefore, a single side yard setback variance of 0.6 feet is
requested.
§ 250-22.G. (3) The minimum required rear yard setback is 30 feet. The applicant
proposes to legalize the one car attached garage with breezeway and
finished 2nd floor constructed 20 feet from the rear property line.
Therefore, a rear yard setback variance of 10 feet is requested.
ZI public hearing on said application will be held before the Village"Zoning Board of Appeals on Tuesday,April 5,2022,
at 8 o'clock p.m.at the Village of Rye Brook Offices located at 938 King Street,Rye Brook,NY 10573,in person unless
an Executive Order extending the State of Emergency for the COVID-19 Pandemic is issued by the Governor of the
State of New York directing or allowing the Village to host public meetings or hearings virtually via videoconference and
teleconference due to public health and safety concerns. If such an Executive Order is issued, the Zoning Board of
Appeals will determine whether to proceed with an in person meeting or meet by videoconference and teleconference.
Whether the meeting is held in person or virtually, the public will have an opportunity to see and hear the meeting live
and provide comments. Please check the Village website at www.Q-cbrook.or&or contact the "Zoning Board of Appeals
Secretary at(914) 939-0668 for information concerning attendance at the me Ling or he ing.
Dated: � 3,2�22
Christopher J. Bradbury, e Clerk
DR
Vy
19
VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK
MAYOR 938 King Street,Rye Brook,N.Y. 10573 ADMINISTRATOR
Paul S.Rosenberg (914)939-0668 Christopher J.Bradbury
www.ryebrook.org
TRUSTEES BUILDING&FIRE
Susan R.Epstein INSPECTOR
Stephanie J.Fischer :Michael J. Izzo
David M.Heiser
Jason A.Mein
NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL
Application # 22-008 February 7, 2022
Juan Vincente Idrovo Tenelanda
27 Wilton Road
Rye Brook, New York 10573
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that your application for a Certificate of Occupancy dated, February 4, 2022,
submitted in connection with Building Permit#126 issued 4/12/1957, for the premises located at 27 Wilton
Road, Parcel ID# 135.66-1-50, has been disapproved because of non-compliance with the following
section(s) of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook:
S 250-22.G. (2) (a) The minimum required single side yard setback is 10 feet. The
applicant proposes to legalize the one car attached garage with
breezeway and finished 2nd floor constructed 9.4 feet from the side
property line.
S 250-22.G. (3) The minimum required rear yard setback is 30 feet. The applicant
proposes to legalize the one car attached garage with breezeway and
finished 2ad floor constructed 20 feet from the rear property line.
Please revise your plans to fully comply with the applicable section(s)of Village Code,or an appeal to this decision
may be brought before the Village Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA) in accordance with §250-13 and §250-40 of
the Code of the Village of Rye Brook. Applications to appear before the ZBA are available online at,
www.ryebrogk.org, or may be obtained at the Building Department.
Sincerely,
Michael J. Izzo
Building& Fire Inspector
mizzo&ryebrook.org
BUILDING DEPARTMENT D C I M Y L�
VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK DD
938 KING STREET FEB - 9 2022
RYE BROOK,NY 10573 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK
(914) 939-0668 BUILDING DEPARTMENT
www.ryebrook.org -
APPLICATION TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
Application Fee: $350.00 (A paid • Escrow Fee: Q' I)rr rr (Y,) paid Date:
C d)
Subject Property:Z7 &(L7aN R9l42p &J. r Ak;bgw7 ALS LOME? Parcel ID#: A&�7.66—1—Sa lone: -y a
Property Owner: JU`}N ,��gpp VO Address: 2,7 4l(LTaN Ra,49R¢J!E AWyeoe
Phone#: 2 62$ Cell#: email: e- c,IQ AM a i it• Co 04
Applicant: r'049CE-l" ODE Address:
Phone#:�`3< 771f—IS-JJ- Cell#: 77ii�-5971- email: C_
Attorney/Agent:_ — Address:
Phone#: Cell#: email:
The applicant named herein does hereby request an appeal from the decision made by the Ruilding Inspector on
an application dated F-£8 2 -f , 20 2 2—,whereby the Building Inspector did: Grant: ( ) /Deny: QQ
the applicant a permit for 64wile4-7'eoei ySvANt7TdT Ai& A CAe- zF ��7� or- 4xe_.,0Ayic-y>
/-sl j as ao,J !�AT /T44S7
1. Type of Appeal: (X)Variance to the Zoning Ordinance ( )Interpretation of the Zoning Ordinance
( ) Certification for Continuation of a Nonconforming Use ( ) Permit for Occupancy
( ) Permit for Use
2. This application relates to: ( )Use ( )Area ( )Height (ASetback ( )Other:
In cannectior, with: ( )A Proposed Building ( )An Existing Building
3. Previous Appeal(s); ( )Have ()OHave Not been made with respect to this particular decision of the
Building Inspector, and ( )Have ()()Have Not been made with respect to any other previous decision(s)
made by the Building Inspector regarding the subject property.
List All Previous Zoning Appeals Either Granted or Denied Concerning the Subject Property
a. A requested variance was ( )granted/( )Denied on an # dated,
b. A requested variance was ( )Ciranted/( )Denied on application# dated, tor.
e. A requested variance was ( )Granted/( )Denied on application# dated, for,
1 (Use additional sheets if necessary)
8/12/2021
4. Alteration:
If work constitutes an alteration or extension to an existing building, describe briefly:
I��Zl��ZF2-► �� Fi��'N �oy��' F�oo�2
5. Construction Cost: What is the estimated cost of the proposed work`' S 3, 6o o —
6. Reasons for Appeal:
A. An Area Variance to the Zoning Ordinance is requested because strict application of the ordinance
would create the following hardship: Pi '&Q A r � �LF-7r
SyB✓F VCR 'TV {�FQ��� !� %L� /-VvE--P 9A /2-//3S-7
WAS Nd1 [SruRD Cor•s-rip --r c�aoj /S' ^ D7 rsy C.7n4 Re--14 y r 9-
B. An Interpretation of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because:
/Ij-A- .
C. A Use Variance to the Zoning Ordinance is requested because strict application of the ordinance would
create the following hardship:
z
Use additional s.".ec 5 if necessary)
9/12/2021
7. Reauested Zoning Appeals:
I. Section of Rye Brook Code: § 2 S o — 2 2 , C-7-
Zoning Requirement: T[. e- alf it p4 um
-5LC-r1?4CL I—C TFN FFY-77,
Proposed Work: To LF&µ"zr -r-,eF onrF:- csrg— ,4774c tter
_Le&CG 57-%n n,,
Requested Variance: �Ef Gov cps u�•rTj�c� /.S' 4• `6 FF -T r ••� 'f�F�
S�� P2-a,o�'T� LIc►C •� y�fQ..µy,LF or- �• 6 F�&T�s' aP�l��d'7�'D
II. Section of Rye Brook Code: §
Zoning Requirement: T'ffE iui,.+jjm um Ilfo.ri92T ei4r2- yA,2J7
1S 130 .AE)=r
Proposed Work: '7�> oa1GT' Z,!4,-h-,,rp
r,✓�,Q.Q a��Ft✓-�1-� � �i�is tt�J �'pzcy�-� ��cGZ_
Requested Variance: :r�- r "�cZ,e tjc7l ajv a 2 h F-PLw 7- sd2cn64
&M392 a&96&.y 410E ; ,d MkAnc.E OF /o >FE=z r Rgm dA:T :v
Zoning Requirement:
Proposed Work:
1\Vyl{V.l�Vll ♦...1{LllV\..
TV. Section of Rye Brook Code: §
Zoning Raq irement:
Proposed Work:
Requested Variance:
V. Section of Rye Brook Code: §
Zoning Requirement:
Proposed Work:
Requested Variance:
3 (Use additional sheets if necessary)
8/12/2021
8. Item checklist of information from instruction sheet:
(X) Letter of Disapproval
()e) Properly Completed & Signed Original Zoning Variance Application
()I-) Two (2) Sets of Sealed Plans
()4) Non-refundable Application Fee of$350.00
(�c) Escrow Account Fee of$1,000.00
( ) Provisions of any deeds, covenants, easements or restrictions affecting the kind of improvements
allowed or prohibited upon the premises. (�P•R•)
( ) Notarized Mailer& Sign Affidavits, Area Map & Public Notification List
(Please note that the notarized affidavits must be received by the Building Department by no later than the
Thursday prior to the scheduled zoning hearing) C-71, PbzLo✓)
**s■.:.::r•�*****:*s*************s�*****�*.:*******���:.*.rs**rr•�..�**s*******r*ss**s*s*.*+*��.*****s*.***
This application must include the notarized signature(s) of the applicant of record as well that
of the legal owner(s) of the subject property in the spaces provided below. Any application not
properly signed shall be deemed null and void and will be returned to the applicant.
STATE OF NEW YORK,COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER ) as:
V//yx&-Ar-r G¢ e-ti> P. E. ,being duly sworn, deposes and states that he/she is the applicant above named,
(print name of individual signing as the applicant)
and further states that (s)he is the legal owner of the property to which this application pertains, or that (s)he is the
4M 4ir-►ew* for the legal owner and is duly authorized to make and file this application.
(indicate architect,contractor,agent,attorney,etc.)
That all statements contained herein are true to the best of his/her knowledge and belief, and that any work performed or
use conducted at the above captioned property will be in conformance with the determination of, and any conditions set
by the Rye Brook Zoning Board of Appeals, with the details as set forth and contained in this application and in any
accompanying approved plans and specifications, as well as in accordance with the New York State Uniform Fire
Prevention & Building Code, the Code of the Village of Rye Brook and all other applicable laws, ordinances and
regulations.
Sworn efore me this Sworn to beforeme this o
day of , 20 day of rC� , 20,2`-Z
Notary Public _ RITA J.TfN� Notary Public
--- Notary Public,State of New York
No.02TI6045496
ouarifed in Westchester Cou
ignature of Property Owner Commission Expires July 31,2L Signature of Applicant
cD
Print Name of Property Owner Print Name of Applicant
ANA M SALAZAR
NOTARY PUBLIC,STATE OF NEW YORK
Registration No.01SA6365173
Qualified in Westcheskr County
Commission Expires 10.02.2025
4
8/12/2021
RLEC EF-- flW/ 1 r�� DD
MAR 31 2022
AFFIDAVIT OF NOTICE TO NEIGHBOR
VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
STATE OF NEW YORK )
SS:
COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER )
Vincent Coakley, being duly sworn, deposes and says:
THAT I am over the age of eighteen years, reside at 62 Dora Street, Stamford, CT 06902, and am
employed by Oliver Engineering, P.C.
THAT on the 215t day of March, 2022, the enclosed Notice of Hearing in connection with an application
for legalization of garage and finished 2nd floor for the property located at 27 Wilton Road was sent by:
1) Regular I' Class Mail to the persons and parties set forth on the attached list which is
annexed hereto and made a part hereof
THAT each of such persons and/or parties are the owners of every property within two hundred and fifty
feet of any part of the property which is the subject of the application referenced above and as indicated
on the tax records of the Village of Rye Brook, New York, and on the attached map.
SIGNATURE OF OWNER O REPRESENTATIVE
n 6— Seraflna E RUSS09
potZry Public,state W Neil York
Sworn to me this a day �!o.c" 'sis71sa
QU:" , :6estcr r,of �r�uLG� ,20.2� car......_ :c`.W:�. 11.< a'
Signed:
Notary blic
w f^f d Rd 554805
55490:
554805 5t. �
- 554805 5548055.,,�5; 5548(
_ 5549)5 55490.5 SSI4r5 564005' S54805
_ _ � 55f805. 5548(E ,dS1eDS 5518[�55SIW)5
�548�---i t e r L n - - '55180�
J e n n—�--_ 5$
4906 SS4805 554W5 .. SZ480i 55-8 5549M`-4805
>3agp! _ - o SySBpS 554906 I`-w_;;5+!w65348055sJ905
7 5S4905 ..-.alp -'AID✓, 551w�S,.�J8fi5 5
r --t 'S54B06 554W5 ft Sg0$ `
_ eft""--�5480�A- 31aH15.', 6548�5
- "� -- M49M 5� �a 554M65/8D3551gp6 •..I S r+• 554M554M 'b480S
551903
554805 _ ..__ ,
554805
554805 -
554805T
55,4p5' S54805 n 35"" 55-M - 8 e I I PI --• - .5.L805
^ T-- 55411 551905 `554805 'S54805. 553806.5'
55"0554M MA" 554"• 51
1554985. ^ 55005 554M 554905 $54" %4M �� I� 554005 554801 5,
ii 550)5 5}1805 M SS4805 .5U" ..5�4 ..-
9549]S 554M M4805 SS18ilf _ - I 554805 554805 5548065_ 5�
551805 �
554" 554805 554805 554805 SS4Bf)5 554805 SU80$ 554e0f��' 5548C6 554605 554
554805 554805 yam.
4; 054805 5 1,� b5480S S`.18(� - 54M 554
35 554905 554805 96, ,� 5,�� 5540$,' 554905 554W5
- 551805 554805 ,95k405 55/805 554805 554" 6`4*n NSUM Su'
554805 55.W5 -.__ - 554W
554" 554W 554905 `5540M 55
1805
554905 _ 3`.4" 5549iO4�'' -
5 SS480S 554805 - 3`.4" 554 D5
-48vS 564805 .._ 554906 - 9[
554tD5. _ 554905 `,548rb S6
8Cb - • 554509. r4tt05 554W5 - 554805
5 -p54_ .
564805 5548�"Y.S 354804 - __
4805 5ti49D; 5549oh 5549OM54905 j
554805 554", 55480
561905
554805 S'NN.'i 554W 554W5554M
�55548055
554805 - 554805 5:
....teC 5 55*0'5 - %549*-4805----- -
554805_�
55.4805. 5534905554805
':aen5 Sy16f�55549R5 - 55m Z54WS -554CK
554AOS55180555"A 554805
55,
55480,tiJ"14805 554'td54805 I&W5 554805 5`.
_`-J&i5 SS4�h5 55480�lL44tl Z4G4 81' 554805
}54g055 1 36490-
V40E'5„hp. bv SS4B05 554805 5fA805
55480554805 {^,�¢490�y 554805' .
Y4 •.. S� .S54905 - 564805
554805 �i4j05 564�'b 5549QS 554905 5548v5
S51fr� 5548051.-,� 55~ - S54r
55184*3554l►J;S 5?49• "Rr4803 5 5&w,
%4905 6/tv75�905 i.M5 . .
Sb4905 s5d9J5 SSAtSCE�+4f�15548Q 554905 554805
55 444055 _ _ jS4805 15-M f
SS4905!',g8*5D 4a": A v V n C r f 554&)f- z
554&A,� UW5 554805 554905
Ich s 554905WW5 SSA 554M
f r 55"5 551805 i ^
4�� y
f 5M905 554805
554805 -
554805 5548M
554W5554905�5
5548w 5548C
M4906 55
Sf�IBCY! •''_"__'.��� .55480;'Sf4905
P..5548w,
27 Wilton Road 250 Foot Radius
Rye Brook, NY 10573 Abutters Map
Parcel ID: 135.66-1-50 March 22, 2022
250 foot Abutters List Report
Rye Town, NY
�4 r! February 08,2022
cyFs Ea,��
Subject Property:
Parcel Number: 135.66-1-50 Mailing Address: Juan Vicente Idrovo Tenelanda
CAMA Number: 135.66-1-50
Property Address: 27 Wilton Rd 27 Wilton Rd,
Abutters:
Parcel Number: 135.66-1-44 Mailing Address: Mariana Ossorio Rev Trust Mariana
CAMA Number: 135.66-1-44 Ossorio
Property Address: 22 Wilton Rd
22 Wilton Rd.
Parcel Number: 135.66-1-45 Mailing Address: Chad Chamey Brittany Chamey
CAMA Number: 135.66-1-45
Property Address: 2 Wilton Cir 2 Wilton Cir,
Parcel Number: 135.66-1-46 Mailing Address: William Servedio Annmarie Servedio
CAMA Number: 135.66-1-46
Property Address: 28 Wilton Rd 28 Wilton Rd,
Parcel Number: 135.66-1-47 Mailing Address: Alan Gary Lebowitz Lynn Ann Lebowitz
CAMA Number: 135.66-1-47
Property Address: 12 Longledge Dr 12 Longledge Dr,
Parcel Number: 135.66-1-48 Mailing Address: Judith L Wilson RevocableTrust Judith I.
CAMA Number: 135.66-1-48 Wilson
Property Address: 14 Longledge Dr
14 Longledge Dr,
Parcel Number: 135.66-1-49 Mailing Address: Kristy Lynn Rotonde
CAMA Number: 135.66-1-49
Property Address: 29 Wilton Rd 29 Wilton Rd,
Parcel Number: 135.66-1-51 Mailing Address: Deborah Russo Revocable Trust
CAMA Number: 135.66-1-51
Property Address: 25 Wilton Rd 25 Wilton Rd,
Parcel Number: 135.66-1-52 Mailing Address: Scott Sudol
CAMA Number: 135.66-1-52
Property Address: 23 Wilton Rd 23 Wilton Rd,
Parcel Number: 135.66-1-53 Mailing Address: Joseph Mc Carthy Mary Ann Mc Carthy
CAMA Number: 135.66-1-53
Property Address: 21 Wilton Rd 21 Wilton Rd,
Parcel Number: 135.66-1-54 Mailing Address: Daniel A. O'Keeffe Denise O'Keeffe
CAMA Number: 135.66-1-54
Property Address: 19 Wilton Rd 19 Wilton Rd,
www.cai-tech.com
Data shown on this report is provided for planning and informational purposes only.The municipality and CAI Technologies
2/8/2022 are not responsible for any use for other purposes or misuse or misrepresentation of this report. Page 1 of 3
Abutters List Report- Rye Town, NY
; °`�� 250 foot Abutters List Repot-t
Rye Town, NY
33j
f; =t February 08,2022
Parcel Number: 135.66-1-70 Mailing Address: Todd Kenny Cynthia Kenny
CAMA Number: 135.66-1-70
Property Address: 6 Maple Ct 6 Maple Ct,
Parcel Number: 135.66-1-71 Mailing Address: Renato Ochoa
CAMA Number: 135.66-1-71
Property Address: 8 Maple Ct 8 Maple Ct,
Parcel Number: 135.66-1-72 Mailing Address: Todd Lieto
CAMA Number: 135.66-1-72
Property Address: 10 Maple Ct 10 Maple Ct,
Parcel Number: 135.66-1-73 Mailing Address: Irina Rish Sergey Panitkin
CAMA Number: 135.66-1-73
Property Address: 12 Maple Ct 12 Maple Ct,
Parcel Number: 135.66-1-74 Mailing Address: Viscome Family Irrevocable Trust Nicole S.
CAMA Number: 135.66-1-74 Viscome
Property Address: 14 Maple Ct
14 Maple Ct,
Parcel Number: 135.66-1-75 Mailing Address: Isabel Gomez Dori Gomez
CAMA Number: 135.66-1-75
Property Address: 15 Maple Ct 15 Maple Ct,
Parcel Number: 135.66-1-76 Mailing Address: Helayne McDonnell
CAMA Number: 135.66-1-76
Property Address: 13 Maple Ct 13 Maple Ct.
Parcel Number: 135.66-1-77 Mailing Address: Michael Grandazzo Donna Grandazzo
CAMA Number: 135,66-1-77
Property Address: 11 Maple Ct 11 Maple Ct,
Parcel Number: 135.66-1-78 Mailing Address: Grace Marks Louise M. Marks
CAMA Number: 135.66-1-78
Property Address: 9 Maple Ct 9 Maple Ct,
Parcel Number: 135.67-1-24 Mailing Address: Jon Silverman
CAMA Number: 135.67-1-24
Property Address: 13 Longledge Dr 13 Longledge Dr,
Parcel Number: 135.67-1-25 Mailing Address: Lois Diamond Mark Diamond
CAMA Number: 135.67-1-25
Property Address: 11 Longledge Dr 11 Longledge Dr,
Parcel Number: 135.67-1-26 Mailing Address: Himi Kittner
CAMA Number: 135.67-1-26
Property Address: 9 Longledge Dr 9 Longledge Dr,
NO
www.cai-tech.com
Data shown on this report is provided for planning and informational purposes only.The municipality and CAI Technologies
2/8/2022 are not responsible for any use for other purposes or misuse or misrepresentation of this report. Page 2 of 3
Abutters List Report- Rye Town, NY
�J.0� '" 250 foot Abutters List Report
r
Y Rye Town. NY
February 08,2022
Parcel Number: 135.67-1-6 Mailing Address.- William E Amett Income Trust Arnett,
CAMA Number: 135.67-1-6 France Arnett, William E
Property Address: 4 Wilton Cir
4 Wilton Cir,
Parcel Number: 135.67-1-7 Mailing Address: Jeffrey J. Charney Ilse P. Chamey
CAMA Number: 135.67-1-7
Property Address: 5 Wilton Cir 5 Wilton Cir,
Parcel Number_ 135.67-1-8 Mailing Address: Charlene Scenna
CAMA Number: 135.67-1-8
Property Address: 3 Wilton Cir 3 Wilton Cir,
Parcel Number: 135.74-1-8 Mailing Address: Rye Hotel LLC
CAMA Number: 135.74-1-8
Property Address: 699 Westchester Ave 18 East 50th St Fl 10th,
www.cai-tech.com
Data shown on this report is provided for planning and informational purposes only.The municipality and CAI Technologies
2/8/2022 are not responsible for any use for other purposes or misuse or misrepresentation of this report. Page 3 of 3
Abutters List Report - Rye Town, NY
t� 13R(ly Village of Rye Brook
�� 'K �• Agcnda
ZoningBoard f Appeals Meeting
o PP g
Tuesday,April 5,2022 at 8:00 PM
Village Hall,938 Sing Street
1.3. #22-008
Juan Vincente Idrovo Tenelanda
27 Wilton Road
Legalize one car attached garage with breezeway and finished 2nd floor constructed under
Building Permit#126 dated 4/12/1957.
Mail Affidavit Sign Affidavit v
Approvals; ( Adjournment
Aye; `'
Nay;
2. SUMMARY APPROVALS:
2.1. Approval of January 4,2022 Zoning Board Summary
Approvals; Adjournment
Aye;
Nay;
2.2. Approval of February 1,2022 Zoning Board Summary
Approvals; Adjournment
Aye;
DM NU
Nay; SB SF
GB K&B
JDs
JS
DH
2
UR(w� Village of Rye Brook
J� enda
Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting
Tuesday,April 5,2022 at 8:00 PM
�;�•�h Village Hall,938 King Street
7.
ANNOUNCEMENT: Pursuant to Chapter 1 of the Laws of 2022 amending Sections 1 and 2 of
Part E of Chapter 417 of the Laws of 2021,this meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals will be
held virtually through the Zoom platform.
INSTRUCTIONS TO ACCESS THE VIRTUAL MEETING: If you have a computer,tablet
or smartphone,you can register,log in and see the video and hear the audio of the live session.
You can access the Zoom meeting at htips://us02web.zoom.us/j/82230077183 and clicking on
"Join a Meeting"and enter Meeting ID: 822 3007 7183 (no password required).You can also call
in to the ZOOM meeting at+1(929) 205-6099,when prompted,enter 822 3007 7183#.
1. ITEMS:
1.1. #21-034(Adjourned to May 3,2022)
The Estate of Vito Cirioni
27 Garibaldi Place
Legalize driveway expansion,walkways and retaining walls.
1.2. #22-004(Adjourned from March 1,2022)
Daniel O'Brien&Jennifer Sonenklare
12 Woodland Drive
Convert existing garage to conditioned living space,construct a new two car garage and
re-grade driveway.
Approvals; Adjournment
Aye;
Nay;
DM MI
SB SF
GB K&B
JDS
JS
DH
1
APPROVED
DATE /e,1 v. 2
BRC�vk
y MINUTES
ty� �; Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting
Q Village Hall,938 King Street
>J Tuesday,April 5,2022
BOARD PRESENT: Donald Moscato,Chair F
F4C—
tJ �Y l-,
Steven Berger
Glenn Brettschneider JUL 2�22
James Schutzer VILLAGE OF RYt BROOK
Joel Simon BUILDING DEPARTMENT
Trustee David M. Heiser,Village Board Liaison
BOARD ABSENT:
STAFF PRESENT: Drew Gamils,Village Counsel
Michael Izzo,Building Inspector
Fred Seifert,Public Access Coordinator
ANNOUNCEMENT:Pursuant to Chapter 1 of the Laws of 2022 amending Sections 1 and 2 of Part E of Chapter 417 of
the Laws of 2021,this meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals will be held virtually through the Zoom platform.
INSTRUCTIONS TO ACCESS THE VIRTUAL MEETING: If you have a computer,tablet or smartphone,you can
register,log in and see the video and hear the audio of the live session.You can access the Zoom meeting at
his://usO2web.zoom.us/i/82230077183 and clicking on"Join a Meeting"and enter Meeting ID: 822 3007 7183 (no
password required).You can also call in to the ZOOM meeting at+1(929) 205-6099,when prompted,enter 822 3007 7183#.
Don Moscato
Welcome to the April 5th meeting of the Rye Brook Zoning Board of Appeals.We have a full complement of the Board.And
with us is Village Council Drew Gamils,Building Inspector Mickey Izzo and Board of Trustees liaison David Heiser.
Conducting the meeting today will be Village Council,Drew Gamils. She'll be recognizing you at the appropriate time of the
session.If you're going to be speaking,please identify yourself,your connection with the applicant if you are the agent.And
we have two applications for this evening.
1. ITEMS:
1.1. #21-034 (Adjourned to May 3,2022)
The Estate of Vito Cirioni
27 Garibaldi Place
Legalize driveway expansion,walkways and retaining walls.
Don Moscato
The first one has been adjourned to the May 3rd meeting.Drew,do we need a motion for that?
Zoning Board of Appeals
April 5,2022
Drew Gamils
I would do a motion just to keep a clean record.
Don Moscato
Okay,can I have a motion and a second,please?
Jamie Schutzer
So,moved.
Glenn Brettschneider
Second.
Don Moscato
Okay,good.Are we okay then to move it to the May 3rd meeting for the next Zoning Board of Appeals.So at least we know
we have one application pending for that.
1.2. #22-004(Adjourned from March 1,2022)
Daniel O'Brien&Jennifer Sonenklare
12 Woodland Drive
Convert existing garage to conditioned living space,construct a new two car garage and
re-grade driveway.
Don Moscato
The second application is item number 22-004 adjourned from the March 1,2022,meeting,Daniel O'Brien and Jennifer
Sonenklare 12 Woodland Drive,convert existing garage to conditioned living space,construct a new two car garage,and
regrade driveway.Because I was in the notification zone.I will be recusing myself from the meeting,turning it over to Steve
Berger,who will then conduct this session for the applicant,and then I'll come back on for the next application in order. So,
Steve,I'll turn it over to you.And I'll probably be muted at this point in time.Thank you.
Steve Berger
Thank you.
Michael Izzo
We did not receive the affidavit of the posting of the sign for this this application.
Steve Berger
But the original one was posted,right?
Michael Izzo
Yes,but the code requires them to provide an affidavit that they updated it.
Steve Berger
Mr. O'Brien was there a sign there?
Dan O'Brien
Yeah,there's one right now if you want me to go and take a picture with my phone.
Page 2 of 36
Zoning Board of Appeals
April 5,2022
Steve Berger
No,just provide an affidavit to Mickey tomorrow,please.
Dan O'Brien
Okay.
Steve Berger
You may want to have somebody take a picture so we can see that it was there tonight too.
Dan O'Brien
I'll do that.
Steve Berger
You don't have to do that now.All right.
Drew Gamils
Mr. O'Brien?
Steve Berger
Go ahead Drew.
Drew Gamils
I'm sorry,I just want to make sure I have Mr. O'Brien and his representatives promoted to panelists,Mr. O'Brien are we
missing anyone from your team?
Dan O'Brien
I believe that there should be.We should have my architect on the call.Mike Gismondi,is he?
Drew Gamils
Yes,he's here.
Dan O'Brien
And then maybe also our engineer Vinnie Coakley,yes,
Drew Gamils
Yes,he was promoted.
Dan O'Brien
Vincent Coakley.
Drew Gamils
He should be,he should be around.
Dan O'Brien
There you go.I think that's everybody on our side that's present.
Page 3 of 36
Zoning Board of Appeals
April 5,2022
Drew Gamils
They're promoted to panelists;their audio and their videos are off.So,feel free everyone to put your videos and audio on.
Steve Berger
Okay, so thank you.Last month,we had a very long extended discussion on this matter in which we adjourn to today to see if
we can finish it up.I would request,the public hearing is still open. So,people may speak.But I would ask that you try to limit
your comments so that we're not rehashing everything that we already spoke about.I'm going to just give my overview of
where we are.And then I'm going to ask Drew to give a more detailed overview before we start the discussion.And also,if
you're going to talk,I think to make Drew not go crazy,please use the raise hand symbol at the bottom of your screen so that
she knows who to call on.That would be helpful,because Drew will be calling on people in order,not me.So,where we were
last time,we had long extensive debates about the plans that the O'Brien's have made to build a new garage,we spent a fair
amount of time talking about water and where the water was going.What is before this Zoning Board are the four variances
that are listed in the in the application,the side yard setback,the two-side yard setback,the allowable side height setback and
the allowable gross floor area.That is what is before this Board,I'm sorry, and then maximum allow,the main building
coverage.There are five. Sorry about that. So,we're going to try to confine our discussion,I understand that this discussion
necessarily involves a discussion of water issues.And that's fine,because that's part of this discussion.But the purpose of this
is not to debate or solve the Village's water problems.What we are looking at is what is pertinent to this application with
respect to the particular variances that Mr. O'Brien has requested in order to build the garage.So.
Joel Simon
I'm sorry,am I correct in that we are only dealing with the garage?
Steve Berger
Well,no,it's the setbacks and the gross floor area.
Joel Simon
Not the building of the new driveway.
Steve Berger
Correct.Yes. Okay.We are not,you know,to the extent the water issues are relevant to those we will discuss them.But I ask
that we not get sidetracked on that discussion as it really belongs not here.Drew,could you give a summary of where we are
so we can commence discussion?
Drew Gamils
Sure. So,I think last month,we had a meeting,a very holistic meeting talking about everything concerning this project.And I
do want the ZBA to focus this month on the specific variances requested,a lot of the water issues that were raised last month
are really best appropriately addressed by the Planning Board.You know,the only water issues you should be thinking about
or talking about are water issues that would come from the construction of the garage,it's the construction of the garage,that
is triggering the need for the variances and the water issues are really about the change in elevation of the driveway,which is
not before the ZBA.If they were changing the driveway and not building a garage,this would never even come before the
ZBA. I also know that the Board received a letter dated March 31 st from Betensky Law, and I do want to highlight a couple of
comments that were raised in that letter.To avoid any confusion,there was a comment raised about the need for a stormwater
pollution prevention permit that is triggered when you have more than 400 square feet of impervious surface. In this case,
there is only an increase of 300 square feet of impervious surface of which the garage is actually being constructed on existing
impervious surface.So that's really a Planning Board issue.And at no level does it trigger a stormwater pollution prevention
permit. Other provisions of the code that are quoted pertain to Section 245,which is the wetland permit,which is not within
the purview of this Board. So those factors should not be discussed.And also,there's references to chapter 209,which is
specifically site plan approval,which does not pertain to this Board.Again,that's before the Planning Board. So,I do want this
Board to focus on the five area variance factors that specifically pertain to the variances at issue and there are a number of
Page 4 of 36
Zoning Board of Appeals
April 5,2022
them,but they all relate to the garage or the expansion of the house. So that's where this Board should focus the discussion
this evening.I think there were benefits last time to understand the project as a whole.But tonight,the focus really should be
just on the variances,the five factors,the construction of the garage and expansion of the house.
Steve Berger
Thank you,Drew. So,we are all familiar with the five factors.And we need to sort of frame our discussions around those.So,
at this point,the public hearing is still open,and I'd like to ask who would like to speak in favor of the proposal and keeping in
mind that to the extent that you have submitted new information or new documents to the Board,which the Board has seen,
the public has not. So,that's a welcome part of the discussion within the confines of what Drew just explained as to what
we're talking about. So again,I prefer that we keep your comments to the topics at hand,without going into digressions.And
without going over and over the same thing. I think we can figure that out from here.So,at this point,who would like to
speak in favor of the proposal?
Drew Gamils
Steve,if I might backtrack,just one second,I think it might be helpful to hear from the applicant.Just a very brief summary
on some of the new correspondence.
Steve Berger
I thought that when I said in favor,I assumed it was the applicant,I'm sorry.
Drew Gamils
So,I think we should yeah, as Steve said,in favor,let's start with the applicant.And just maybe you want to focus your
comments on the new materials you have submitted since the last meeting, any new information you have on any responses.
Dan O'Brien
So,Drew,and members of the Board and members of the community,you'll have to bear with me a little bit only because
there's been a lot of back and forth.And I'm not entirely clear how much information is new versus what we discussed at a
pretty lengthy meeting last time.I think what I can say is that what we're really trying to do is mitigate flooding that we have in
our property.And the only way to do that is to elevate a driveway and to build a garage.And that's why we're talking about the
garage,per se,I'm not trying to build a new garage.For any other reason than to do that.There was some discussion about
what happens with the stormwater.And we provided the town with some additional information that I think clarified the
professionals on my team and their opinion that the project does not negatively impact stormwater issues for our neighbors,
that were not doing anything in terms of sending water from my property to their property.I'm not sure if they're more
specific questions that the group has,but that's really kind of where we are.
Glenn Brettschneider
I actually have a questions Mr. O'Brien.Excuse me, so where the original garage was,is going to be,I don't know if the right
word is converted.But we use the word converted to a storage space,something if it flooded, and I'm trying to figure out what
do you do with that piece of your house?
Dan O'Brien
So that would be converted basically to unfinished storage in what would be a lengthier section of the basement.If that makes
sense. I don't know what the dimensions of that room are off the top of my head,but they're about,I don t know,20 feet by
20 feet by about five feet 10 inches high,maybe six feet.
Glenn Brettschneider
Is it going to be the same elevation as it was before?
Page 5 of 36
Zoning Board of Appeals
April 5,2022
Dan O'Brien
Yes.Because that's within the interior footprint of the foundation of our current structure,if that makes sense.
Glenn Brettschneider
Right?So,if there is another flood,the,what you're proposing is a garage that will be higher graded with a change in your
driveway. So,the new garage would not get flooded.And to the extent that there is a flood,that basement,that garage that's
now going to be storage is still going to be what's the word,available to the elements?I'm not fording the right word.
Dan O'Brien
No.So sure,I can explain.Mr.Brettschneider. So currently,to put a car in my garage,to put a car in my garage currently,you
have to pull down my driveway which descends from the street,several feet, and then you have to make a turn and you turn to
the right 90 degrees and then you pull forward another 15 feet.And once you ve pulled forward,you're within the footprint of
the foundation of my house and you're at the same elevation as the lowest part of my.
Steve Berger
You went on mute,Mr. O'Brien
Drew Gamils
Hold on,Mr.O'Brien that's my fault. If you re not speaking,please mute yourself.
Dan O'Brien
So,what we're planning on doing,Mr.Brettschneider is to fill in the opening in the foundation,which would eliminate access
to that space for the cars,we're planning on filling in the driveway,which would elevate the pitch of the driveway and then
Putting a new garage on top of what is now basically blacktop and parking.And that means that if we were to receive the
same,if we were to experience the same type of weather conditions,that water would not be able to enter that portion of the
basement,because it could not follow the same path,it could not go down the driveway,and it could not enter the foundation.
Glenn Brettschneider
So,if it would remain dry,because you think the waters not going there. Could that then be used for another room?
Dan O'Brien
I don't think so.Because it's really short,if it's favorable to our application that that remains is unfinished storage,I'm
amenable to that.
Glenn Brettschneider
Okay,I was just I was just curious what the intent was to do with that,okay.
Joel Simon
Drew,is that before us as to what the use of the old garage would be?No?
Drew Gamils
The use of the old garage is not before the ZBA.You could talk about what the new garage is going to be used for.And that
might you know,what the old garage was used for I,you know,could help understand what his expectation is to use the new
garage,but the focus is just the new garage.
Joel Simon
And again,the increase of incline of the driveway is not our issue.
Page 6 of 36
Zoning Board of Appeals
April 5,2022
Drew Gamils
Correct.
Joel Simon
Correct.All right.
Steve Berger
So,I think Mr. Gismondi,had his hand up before mine.So,we'll let him talk,if we could.
Michael Gismondi
Thank you.Thank you,Mr.Berger.The old garage actually has a seven foot high ceiling and the wall,the actual door opening,
the garage door opening will be closed, and the new garage is built adjacent to it just right up against it.There are no windows
in that room,there'll be used for just cold storage,unheated.There are no windows there.You really there's no way to really
make it habitable unless you provide mechanical ventilation and mechanical lighting.So,there's no reason to have that as any
kind of finished space,but it will be totally enclosed. So that it won't have the ability to have any water flow into it,like it is
right now through the garage door.So that would be in case the new garage will sit right up against the side of it. Our new
garage is coming out the side of the home on that side.And I have to point out one thing,if you see the front yard slope from
the street to the front of the house right now,that's about the extent of the slope of the new driveway,it's other words we're
kind of matching that it's a very low slope,it's only about 2%,maybe two,two and a half percent,which is a very,very low
slope.The whole idea is that it's just enough to slip the water down to the trough drain that is up at the property line next to
adjacent to the street. So,we're not creating this steep incline driveway down towards the street. It's simply almost the same
level as the front lawn of Mr.And Mrs. O'Brien's house.So that's kind of how that works.In terms of the design.We're,we're
building within that space that is in front of the existing garage that has a two and a half foot high stone wall around it.And
the adjacent neighbor's property is almost level the top of that stone wall. So,our driveway level is two and a half feet below
the neighbor's property.And we're building inside that corral almost,and the garage is slightly smaller than that area of that
driveway area that leads to the garage. So,you go down the driveway.Now you make a hard right into the garage that's
underneath the house.So,it's at the basement level.
Steve Berger
So,I'd like to sort of refocus where we're going because we're not again we're not supposed to be discussing the grade of the
driveway that is not ours.
Michael Gismondi
Exactly.
Steve Berger
Our issue here is the size of the garage and where it's located. So,one of the,one of the factors is,is this the smallest variance
on all these fronts that can be done?Okay,so I'd like to ask,I mean,a lot of issues,a lot of possibilities were discussed at the
last meeting,has the applicant thought of any proposals to either remove or eliminate a variance or,or make them smaller
because they are as they're pretty substantial.So,I'd like to hear what the what the proposal is for. Going forward with this
garage,and whether there's any way to eliminate any of the variances?
Michael Gismondi
Well,actually,the garage that we've designed,is only 20 feet wide,a standard garage is about 22 feet wide. So,we minimized it
as much as possible,so that it really only accommodates maybe two compact cars,the garage door is 16 feet wide,like the
garage door that we have presently. So,it only really allows that maneuverability to get into the garage. So,we have a
minimum, a minimum space,we only have two feet on either side of that garage door. So that's the minimum size of a
compact two car garage.That's why it falls at 20 feet.
Page 7 of 36
Zoning Board of Appeals
April 5,2022
Steve Berger
I have a question,you say it's a minimum size of a compact car garage,without trying to play a one upsie game here.I mean,I
guess where I'm going with this is if it's a two car compact garages,it's really not going to serve the purpose to fit more than
one car in there.Is it possible to design a one car garage or a tandem garage where you can get two cars in,but it's not as wide?
Michael Gismondi
You cannot do a tandem car,a tandem garage.The reason being that if you look at the photographs to the side of that house,
all the windows that face that elevation,that side,provide light and ventilation to the rooms that are occupied in the existing
house,you would block all of the light and ventilation.Plus, the fact that since the property is sloping to the rear,there'll be a
very high elevation of foundation below this garage that you don't need.We've situated that garage so that it's the minimum
size. It fits right inside that driveway area that's corralled by stone walls.And we've just made that a compact area,I have to tell
you Mr.Berger,the reason that this property has difficulty with the side yard is because it's a non-conforming lot.It's 19,000
square feet,the zoning is 25,000.The majority of the homes in that neighborhood have 25,000 square feet.
Steve Berger
Rye Brook is filled with non-conforming lots. So,we understand that issue.
Michael Gismondi
No question and that's why the Zoning Board exists.
Steve Berger
But here's my question.You said that the two car garage would be 20 feet,and it would be very narrow.What would the width
of a one car garage be?
Michael Gismondi
With one car garage is probably 12 feet 12 to 14 feet.
Steve Berger
So,if it was 14 feet and comfortable for the opening of car doors,we'd be reducing this variance by six feet.
Michael Gismondi
No because I think that this home requires a two car garage.If you look at every single home on this block.And in these
neighborhoods,they all have two car garages to penalize.
Joel Simon
That wasn't a question though.If it was a one car garage,it would reduce the variance by six feet though.
Michael Gismondi
Would it reduce the variance?Yes, of course it would because the garage would be smaller?Absolutely. It would be.
Steve Berger
Would that also affect the height of the garage if not as wide?Would that also mathematically affect the height setback issues?
Michael Gismondi
No,the height would be the same,the height would be exactly the same.It would just be the width.The point again being that
these applicant is only doing this because of a situation that he has.There is a good cause for this.But does this garage in its
size and proportion have a negative effect on the neighborhood?Does it have a negative effect?Is it a five car garage?No,it is
Page 8 of 36
Zoning Board of Appeals
April 5,2022
not,it is a two car garage which is consistent with the neighborhood.It holds the value of this home in comparison to the
other homes in this neighborhood.There is nothing that this garage would have any kind of an impact on in terms of a
negative environmental issues,aesthetic issues. It blends very well with the with the house,it just happens to be that we only
have a 25 foot five side yard there.And we're not building 22,or a 24 foot garage,which is standard,that's a standard garage.
Because what happens is,if you have two doors,you'll have a two nine for doors,which is 18 feet,you'll have two feet
between the two doors,which brings it up to 20 feet, and then you'll have two feet on at least two feet on either side,which
brings it to 22 feet.So,we've compacting this to make it the minimum size that it can instill.And when I say compact car,
you're talking about a midsize car,you're not talking about an SUV,you're talking about a micro,you're talking about a car that
Mr. O'Brien has right now.Maybe you know a,you know,a Subaru or a Toyota,you know,it's a modest car.And you can get
two cars in there certainly can with a 16 foot wide garage door. So again,we looked at it from a number of different ways can
we make it 19 foot six course if you wanted to squeeze it a little bit more you could.But the point being that five feet is a
reasonable amount of space there,you have to also remember that this that the stone wall,that is the left-hand side of his
property.That whole stone was on Mr. O'Brien's property,the property lines on the back side or the left hand side of that
stone wall.That doesn't change,that still remains,that stone walls still going to be there.And that that creates a visual point of
the end of Mr.O'Brien's property and the beginning of the neighbor's property. So that property line is right there.We're not
changing the stone wall.
Steve Berger
I have a question for Mickey,is that stone wall part of the five feet?Or is that in top of the five feet?
Michael Gismondi
Within.
Michael Izzo
I'm sorry,Steve,I didn't understand the question.
Steve Berger
Mr. Gismondi said that the stone wall is on Mr. O'Brien's property.
Michael Izzo
It's his stone wall.
Steve Berger
So,is that included in the setback of five feet?Does that include that stone wall?So how much room is between the garage
and that stone wall?
Michael Gismondi
Three feet from the edge of the garage to the outside face to the stone walls,is five feet,the stone walls two feet, and there's a
three foot space between the stone wall and the new wall of the sidewall of the garage.
Steve Berger
And in terms of the height setback,is there any way to reduce the roof size?
Michael Gismondi
That's a product of the position of that side yard elevation.
Page 9 of 36
Zoning Board of Appeals
April 5,2022
Steve Berger
But we've seen architects be able to design a lower roof or whatever.I mean,we're trying to address concerns about blocking
light. So,is there a way to redesign that roof,that isn't so sharp.
Michael Gismondi
What we did Mr.Berger was we made that a hip roof,we didn't make it a gable ends,so that there would be a two story
exterior wall facing the neighbor's property.What we did was we had a one story wall,but we have a hip roof,that slopes back
towards the O'Brien's property.So,it's very minimal.It's not unlike what's there now,but it has a very minimal slope.So,we
have to lower the roof there to minimize the elevation.
Steve Berger
I guess my question for you is,can you lower it anymore?
Michael Gismondi
No.
Steve Berger
I'm not saying that you didn't do and I'm asking you,if you could lower anymore?
Michael Gismondi
We really can't.I mean,that's the minimum slope on a roof shingle that is reasonable.It's a four on 12 slope. If we make it any
lower,we're trying to match the existing slope of the house. Once again,if you look at the front elevation,the new elevation,
all those slopes line up and match.Again,it's a matter of aesthetics.You know,it's mimics the addition on the right hand side.
Steve Berger
Let me ask you an open ended question. Is there anything you can do to minimize any of these variances before we spend the
next hour debating that everything is justified?Is there anything that you can think of that can minimize these variances
without and meet most of the applicant's needs?
Michael Gismondi
I'd have to acquiesce to my clients.
Dan O'Brien
Mr.Berger,so I will say that I've spent an inordinate amount of time on this with the Planning Board.
Steve Berger
I have no doubt that you have,we understand.
Dan O'Brien
So,I would say with all due respect,no,we feel that the design that were putting forth is really what seems to make the most
sense for our application and to try and contort the project mi in several different or any other different way,in order to try
and come up with a numerical lowering of the variance doesn't really meet the practical objective of the project in the first
place. If that makes sense,you know,I understand that something like the tandem garage may reduce the size of the variance
that's considered,but it's not really a practical approach,because of the way the footprint of the land and the property all work
out in terms of the rest of the structure.So,I think we feel that we're putting forth what would be the best solution,and what
would involve the minimal request for the Zoning Board as is.
Page 10 of 36
Zoning Board of Appeals
April 5,2022
Michael Gismondi
We tucked this down,we kept reducing it and minimizing it,finding ways to reduce the size of it.We pushed it back a little bit,
get it away from the front of the front of the property to reduce that we put a little breezeway around the back. So,it's
completely hidden.That doesn't require a variance,but there's a breezeway that connects it to the to the home.We minimized
that.We tried to maximize the colors and materials,but we took it and shrunk it as much as possible,but you have to
understand Mr.Berger and the rest of the Board.The point is that because it is in its proximity to the side yard that affects
everything.It affects the side yard ratio,it affects the setback,it affects the gross floor area is based upon the nonconformity,
all those other dimensional issues are all about the nonconformity.So that where we have difficulty,it may not appear that it is
as small as it could be.But if you look at some of the other garages on those on that street,you'll find that they're much larger,
and much bigger and much more voluminous.And we we've taken this and tried to again,be sensitive to the neighbor,
because we did put the hit the slope on that side,so that we reduce that elevation to just a one story elevation,kept the stone
wall,we can do some landscaping there.And we put mitigation in the back 600 square feet of mitigation and planting that the
Planning Board asked us to take a look at and do.We planted native shrubs,and we've created a nice buffer for the neighbor
in the back of this garage,just so that it would make it a little bit more tolerable for them.And they'd have a little bit more
privacy. So,in the rear of the garage,it's being fully landscaped by you know,by virtue of.
Steve Berger
We're going to have to talk about the side landscaping,but we do that later.Anyone on the Board?
Glenn Brettschneider
Yeah,I have a question.
Steve Berger
Sure Glenn.
Glenn Brettschneider
So,you said that you've tried to make it as small as possible.And I understand Mr.OBrien's needs,there's nothing to reduce
in your mind because that that two car garage is really the minimum of what you need.In his opinion.You said you tried
making it smaller.And I'm just trying to figure out smaller from what,if you have three feet on the side how much larger
could you even attempted to make the garage,that you'd have a passable walkway to get to the backyard?I mean,did you
contemplate a 22 foot garage?And you've brought it down to 20?I'm just trying to see where you started you know,because if
you say youre going to try to make the smallest variance,you could,you know,how did you get to the 20 feet?
Michael Gismondi
Well,we started off with 23 feet,right up to the side of that stone wall being the demising point.And then we worked.We
pushed it back the extra three feet because we thought that would be reasonable.You can walk through this garage there's a
door out the back and a set of steps that go to the rear yard.And of course,they also have on the right hand side of the
property.They have a way to get around to the back of their property as well.But we started off at 23 using the wall as the
place where we touch and,abut our new garage wall foundation wall against that stone wall and Mr.and Mrs. O'Brien,Dan
and Jen said,you know what,let's push it back three feet,let's make it as much as we can and still make it a usable,usable
garage for two compact cars.And that's what we've and again,it's consistent with the neighborhood.It's consistent with other
homes in the neighborhoods. It's consistent and with what he's got now,in terms of what he has now he has he has a two car
garage that his home is utilizing that.And it's pretty standard in those neighborhoods.And that's what we're trying to mimic,
at a miniature size.
Glenn Brettschneider
Yeah,it's hard.It's hard to argue.It's,you know,it's the minimum when you have,you know,or it's the minimum for the
neighborhood,a two car garage,when you started with the non-conforming to begin with,and I completely understand that
most has two car garages,but your house is unique. Or this house is unique not your house and not unique,it's the only one.
Page 11 of 36
Zoning Board of Appeals
April 5,2022
But it is non-conforming,which,which presents problems to begin with.And,and so,you know,to insist on a two car garage.
You know,when you have a property that makes it difficult to accommodate,it's just something to think about.It's not,a two
car garage is not a requirement to live there.But I understand why you'd want it for.
Dan O'Brien
Mr.Brettschneider and the Board,if I could just point out,you know,I think that part of what we're talking about right now,
kind of I don t know any other way to put it,except it kind of revolves around this idea of,hey,the O'Brien's are asking for a
variance. So,we're asking for an exception.And as a counterbalance to that is kind of this concept of well,you know,what are
they giving up?And why do they want this exception.And I just want to point out that,you know,currently,the way our
property is situated from a parking and car standpoint,if you will,I could fit two small cars inside my garage,and I could close
the door,I wouldn't have room for bicycles, and motorcycle or a snowblower and a lawn mower and the rest of that stuff.But
I could get two cars in there,I could also get two cars in the parking area, and then another two cars in the driveway.So,if
push came to shove,I could get six cars on my property without intruding into the street,we're going to be giving up two of
those parking spots with this construction project,because we're going to lose the two spots that are underneath my house.
And we're only putting the garage where there's an existing parking area now.So,we are absolutely giving up something from
the functionality of the house while we do this.And this is all driven by us trying to minimize we have to give up while we
mitigate the problem that we have from the storm drain flooding.So that's really what's kind of driving all this and I wanted to
make sure that that was clear that that we're not just we're not,you know,if we if we execute this project,if the variances are
granted,we're not getting everything that that we want,because quite frankly,we're still losing out on this deal.So,you know,
to the extent that that's a consideration for the Board,I just wanted to point that out,you know,we're going to go through all
this expense,and all this effort and expend all these resources.And you know,we're still giving up something.
Steve Berger
Thank you. Glenn,let me interrupt.
Glenn Brettschneider
Okay.
Steve Berger
Because it was pointed out to Drew and to me,that actually at the last meeting,we actually closed the public hearing.But we
allowed Mr. OBrien to speak today was supposed to be for the Board debating.But given that we allowed Mr. O'Brien to
speak,it would only be fair,we don't to allow Mr. Cazakoff to speak as well since he has.And then after that,I would ask that
the Board have a discussion about what we want to do and interact with the applicant and the members of the audience on
how we're going to solve this. So,with all due respect,I think I'm going to cut the discussion from the applicant off to allow
Mr. Cazakoff to have his say in the hearing because that would be fair. So,Mr. Cazakoff.
Michael Cazakoff
Hi,Mr.Berger,thank you very much.I understand that the point of this meeting is not to discuss the water issue.I'm not
going to discuss water issue.As I've stated in my letters,I support Mr. O'Brien and Sonenklare's project.I do not have any
arguments against their proposed project.You know,pending the water issue.I do believe their project will come out
beautifully and it will definitely improve their situation.I believe it conforms to their house.I understand Mr. OBrien's
concerns about the size of the garage. Of course,be on the property line,you know,I'm not,I'm not going to make any
argument about them about the size of their garage,I do not.I'm not making any requests to them to make the garage smaller.
They are doing what they are doing to protect their house to keep the value of their house.I understand Mr.OBrien's
argument about losing parking spots and making certain concessions.And again,I just want to express how I do support this
project,I do support them solving their problem,pending any concerns about the water flow issue.And that's I have respect
to any decision that the Zoning Board makes.
Page 12 of 36
Zoning Board of Appeals
April 5,2022
Steve Berger
Thank you,Mr.Cazakoff,I have a couple of ideas to throw out that would be that I haven't really vetted with anyone else on
the Board. So,they're free to shut it down,too. So just a couple ideas and thinking about it.If one of the issues for the
neighbor is the visual aspect of the garage being so close the property line,there can't be any.There s no room for any
landscaping between the garage and that stone wall.If Mr. O'Brien and Mr. Cazakoff were mutually agreeable as to size and
plantings,would Mr. Cazakoff allow Mr. O'Brien to put some trees or landscaping on the other side of the wall to prevent,
you know,to diminish the fact that the garage is so close to the property line,that's number one.Number two is I think that
the Board should condition if we grant the variance,which hasn't been decided yet. One that the variance does not allow any
building behind the garage.In other words,it can't be extended,I mean,they would create other variances,because of gross
floor area and whatever,but I don't want this this garage then becoming a den becoming an in law apartment or anything like
that.And similarly,no building on top of the garage for like an in law apartment or anything like that.If this variance is
granted,I think it needs to be conditioned as we have in other situations in Rye Brook,where we are dealing with severely
non-conforming units to try to minimize die impact of the variances on the neighbor on the property etc.So that was my
piece. I would like the Board.Well,actually,before I do that,I should ask both Mr. O'Brien and Mr. Cazakoff,if any of those
any of those conditions were acceptable or not acceptable or need to be changed.And then I'd like the Board to respond.
Dan O'Brien
So,Mr.Berger,could I respond first to I think what is most within my control?So,you asked about,you asked about whether
about conditioning, die granting of a potential variance on a prohibition of expanding construction behind the garage and on
top of the garage.And I really,honestly don t see a problem with that,from my perspective.You know.
Steve Berger
As you understand,if we grant the variance,it not only binds you and binds die person who buys your house.
Dan O'Brien
I understand.
Steve Berger
And that's why we need to do something like that.
Dan O'Brien
Right.In all honesty,Mr.Berger,this is really,again,I don't mean to keep going back to the flooding.But my objective in all
of this has been to try and protect my home. So that one,my family is safe,two our property is safe.And three,the value of
my home is safe. So.
Steve Berger
And Mr. O'Brien,the Board,as unanimous body has a lot of sympathy for everything that you've been through,but we still
have a duty to do this examination.
Dan O'Brien
I would be amenable to the that,that contingency,we would be amenable to that contingency.
Steve Berger
Mr. Cazakoff,do you have any input?
Michael Cazakoff
I don't.And I'm agreeable to that.I just have one question for you.Mr.Berger,when you say building behind the garage,do
you mean converting their current garage or the mudroom they have planned.
Page 13 of 36
Zoning Board of Appeals
April 5,2022
Steve Berger
Beyond what is in the plan.
Michael Cazakoff
Okay,no,I know,I have no issue with
Steve Berger
I don't want them,I don't want them putting a new den or expanded kitchen,you know,or anything.In other words,I don't
want to make this any bigger than it is.
Michael Cazakoff
I understand that.That's no concern of mine.Really,regarding the planting,I'm happy to.
Dan O'Brien
We are as well.
Michael Cazakoff
Have Mr. O'Brien and Mrs. Sonenklare to make it look nice.
Steve Berger
Thank you both.So,I'd like to open it up to Jamie,Joel and Glenn for your questions and discussion because I've been doing
most of the talking.
Joel Simon
There is a question for Drew regarding the landscaping suggestion,if I understand correctly,that would cross the property
line. So,since that's not the property before us,is that something that we can control or order?
Drew Gamils
We typically do not encourage conditions such as that. However,if both property owners are present and agreeable to that
term,and they seem that they can move forward,working together,then that could be okay.But we only do it in both
property owners because you can't require you know,Mr. O'Brien to go on Mr. Cazakofps property,it's not his,but if Mr.
Cazakoff says,this is okay.
Joel Simon
It's become a stipulation that they've entered into.
Steve Berger
I think that we have done that before in a couple of applications.
Drew Gamils
Right.But only when both property owners agree to it.We cannot force them.
Steve Berger
We cannot force Mr.,We cannot tell Mr. O'Brien,he must go on Mr. Cazakofps property without his permission,that that
would put us all in jail.
Page 14 of 36
Zoning Board of Appeals
April 5,2022
Drew Gamils
It would require him to do plantings on his own property.
Steve Berger
Right,but there's no room.There's no room between the garage and that wall.
Jamie Schutzer
No,but isn't there?Isn't there room on the other side of the wall?
Steve Berger
That's in Mr. Cazakoffs property.The wall end is the demising wall.
Drew Gamils
Because I believe it's two feet to the wall,three feet to the property line.
Steve Berger
It's the other way around three feet to the wall and two feet to the property line.
Drew Gamils
Thank you.
Steve Berger
The end of the wall,the outside of the wall is the property line.So,there is no room for Mr. O'Brien to put any plantings
between the garage and that wall.But we're trying to minimize the impact on Mr. Cazakoff Joel?
Joel Simon
Is this something Mr. Cazakoff would want?Not whether he's agreeable,is it something that he would want and if we were
able to put together that type of stipulation?
Michael Cazakoff
Again,I'm fine with that,you know,as Mr. O'Brien has noted,I had trees taken down on that side of the property,mainly
because they were dead and a nuisance to my power lines.There is a need for,right now the area between our two houses is
open and there is absolutely no privacy.There is a need for trees and bushes there.And again,working with Mr. O'Brien and
Ms. Sonenklare is totally acceptable.
Steve Berger
And just to be clear,I'm not suggesting that Mr.O'Brien has to plant trees all along your whole property line,but just area
where the garage is.
Michael Cazakoff
Right?Agreed.
Steve Berger
Jamie, Glen, anything?
Page 15 of 36
Zoning Board of Appeals
April 5,2022
Jamie Schutzer
I know the water is not an issue.But just out of curiosity,the gutters and leaders coming off the garage.Where's that water
going?
Michael Gismondi
There is an existing catch basin in the corner of that driveway down there.And that has a pipe,four inch pipe that leads down
to the stream below ground.We plan to connect the gutters and leaders of this new roof down to that drain and rebuild it and
interconnect that.And that will then find its way to the stream.Down,all underground.The driveway drainage will go down
to a trough drain.That's how,like I said before,yeah,but that will be connected into that existing.Like that's there.
Steve Berger
Okay.Jamie,anything else?
Glenn Brettschneider
The only thing I did want to say before to Mr. O'Brien is that,you know,don't think that we feel that you must give up
something to go ahead or that we're punishing you,you know,what we tried to do is to get what the homeowner once with
the least amount of variances when possible.And sometimes the least amount of variance is what the applicant wants.And
many times,there's ways for the applicant to accommodate a smaller variance.And that's what we look for.So again,we're
not,I don't want you to think that at least I sound like I'm trying to punish you or make you feel like I have to give up
something in order to do that.That's not the way I wanted to come across and I hope I did not come across that way.
Dan O'Brien
Nope.I understand that.And I really,I was just trying to I think offer Mr.Berger,and the Board I understand the concept
behind trying to find a minimum to minimize the amount of variance.That's right.that's engaged.So,I fully you know,I'm a
member of the town too. So,you know,right now I'm asking for a variance.But there are going to be times when,you know,
I'm on the other side of this.And really,it's the Zoning Board's role to do that. So,I don't feel like any of this is punitive or
unfair.I'm just trying to explain that.When we started this project,we looked at everything that we wanted,and then we made
some decisions about what seemed like it was impractical or infeasible. So,you know,if we thought about what we were going
to do,we immediately discounted any concept that would have really,drastically increased the footprint of built out land on
our property,you know, and the idea that the new garage would basically sit to a tremendous extent on top of the existing
blacktop,we felt was a good thing. So,I don't I don't feel that way.Mr.Brettschneider.
Steve Berger
Anybody else on the Board have anything to say? Okay,so the Public Hearing is now closed.So,is the Board prepared to
make a decision?
Joel Simon
I think so,yes,I am.
Steve Berger
Is the Board comfortable with the conditions that we talked about?
Joel Simon
Yes,my only concern is how it's phrased,because if it's too vague,then it leaves open a large area for disagreement between
the two parties as to the type of trees,how many trees.
Steve Berger
I think we leave that to the two of them to agree.
Page 16 of 36
Zoning Board of Appeals
April 5,2022
Drew Gamils
We do have to add some sort of specification in the resolution.You know about plantings along the garage,do we want to
specify if they're going to be like arborvitaes?I am concerned about leaving it too open ended.
Joel Simon
That's my point.
Glenn Brettschneider
It's not on the applicant's property.
Steve Berger
Well,can we condition it such that it's not bigger than the length of the garage,the plants to be agreed between the two or
refereed by Mickey or somebody in in the Building Department?I mean,I don't think that we're going to be asking Mr.
O'Brien to put 12 foot trees there now.
Drew Gamils
What we can do is we can ask,Mr. O'Brien to include that landscaping on his next submission to the Planning Board,at which
time if Mr. Cazakoff strongly disagrees with that landscaping,there'll be a Public Hearing at the Planning Board that he can
comment on?Does that sound like a possible solution to Mr. O'Brien and Mr. Cazakoff?
Dan O'Brien
It does.
Michael Cazakoff
Yeah,that's fine. If I may suggest one thing,because Mr. O'Brien is having is having a square area of landscaping done behind
his garage.If the condition could be that that landscaping on the side of the garage conforms to that landscaping in back of
the garage if it's I don't know what if there's anything like that you would be willing to make as a condition if not,I'm willing
to just go ahead with what you've stated thus far.
Drew Gamils
With the emerald,green arborvitaes?
Michael Cazakoff
Yeah,I mean,just to make it,go ahead.
Steve Berger
I think Mr.Cazakoff s way of,consistent with the other landscaping that Mr. O'Brien is doing.
Michael Gismondi
If I may add,the Planning Board asked us to come up with some indigenous plantings so that it had an emerald,green
arborvitae six to seven feet high.In that mitigation area. So,I think that will be something that that could work.
Steve Berger
Okay-.
Michael Gismondi
It's on Plan SP-04.
Page 17 of 36
Zoning Board of Appeals
April 5,2022
Steve Berger
Well,since you're going to need to go back to the Planning Board.I think you include that in your next Planning Board.
Michael Gismondi
Absolutely.
Joel Simon
But it creates our guideline.
Steve Berger
Right.
Michal Gismondi
Sure.
Steve Berger
Mr. O'Brien is that alright with you?
Dan O'Brien
Yeah,it is.
Steve Berger
Okay.All right,Board members.Are we ready to vote?Yes. Okay,I'm going to read the resolution. It's a long one,so bear
with me.
Page 18 of 36
Zoning Board of Appeals
April 5,2022
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS,application has been made to the Zoning Board by Daniel O'Brien&Jennifer Sonenklare (the
"Applicants") for(1) a 10 foot Single Side Yard Setback Variance where the minimum required single side yard setback is 15
feet pursuant to Village Code 5 250-18.2.H(2)(a); (2) a 20.2 Total of Two Side Yards Variance where the minimum required
total of two side yards setback is 40 feet pursuant to Village Code 5 250-18.2.H(2)(b); (3) a 2.3 Side Height Setback Ratio
Variance where the maximum allowable side height setback ratio is 1.3 pursuant to Village Code 5 250-18.2 J(2); (4) a 1,831
Gross Floor Area Variance where the maximum allowable gross floor area is 3,749 sq. ft pursuant to Village Code 5 250-
18.2.F, (5) a 11.62%Main Building Coverage Variance where the maximum allowable main building coverage is 14%pursuant
to Village Code 5 250-38.B,in connection with the proposed conversion of the existing garage to conditioned living space,
construct a new two car garage and re-grade driveway,on property located at 12 Woodland Drive,in an R-25 zoning district
on the west side of Woodland Drive,approximately 150 feet from the intersection of Beechwood Circle and Woodland Drive.
Said premises being known and designated on the tax map of the Village of Rye Brook as Parcel ID#135.36-1-28;and
WHEREAS,the premises contains the following legal nonconformities: (1) an existing non-conforming single side
yard setback of 14.8 feet at the west elevation,(2) an existing non-conforming gross floor area of 4,900 sq. ft., and(3) an
existing non-conforming main building coverage of 22.15%;and
WHEREAS, a duly advertised public hearing was held on March 1,2022,at which time all those wishing to be heard
were given such opportunity;and
WHEREAS,the public hearing was closed on March 1,2022; and
WHEREAS, the proposed action is a Type II action pursuant to the New York State Environmental Quality Review
Act and accordingly,no further environmental review is required;and
WHEREAS, the Board, from the application, after viewing the premises and neighborhood concerned, and upon
considering each of the factors set forth in Village Code �250-13(G)(b)[2][a]-[e] of the Rye Brook Code, fords with respect to
the requested variances that:
1) The variances WILL NOT create an adverse impact to the character of the neighborhood;
2) The benefit the Applicants seek CANNOT be achieved through another method, feasible for the Applicants to
pursue,that does not require the variances;
3) The variances ARE substantial;
Page 19 of 36
Zoning Board of Appeals
April 5,2022
4) The variances WILL NOT create any adverse impacts to the physical or environmental conditions of the
neighborhood; and
5) The need for the variances IS NOT self-created;and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the said application for (1) a 10 foot Single Side Yard Setback Variance where
the minimum required single side yard setback is 15 feet pursuant to Village Code � 250-18.2.H(2)(a); (2) a 20.2 Total of Two
Side Yards Variance where the minimum required total of two side yards setback is 40 feet pursuant to Village Code 5 250-
18.2.H(2)(b); (3)a 2.3 Side Height Setback Ratio Variance where the maximum allowable side height setback ratio is 1.3 pursuant
to Village Code 5 250-18.2 J(2); (4) a 1,831 Gross Floor Area Variance where the maximum allowable gross floor area is 3,749
sq. ft pursuant to Village Code 5 250-18.2.F, (5) a 11.62 % Main Building Coverage Variance where the maximum allowable
main building coverage is 14%pursuant to Village Code 5 250-38.B,in connection with the proposed conversion of the existing
garage to conditioned living space,construct a new two car garage and re-grade driveway,on property located at 12 Woodland
Drive,is hereby GRANTED on the following conditions:
1) No permit or certificate of occupancy shall be issued until the Applicants have paid in full all application and
consultant fees incurred by the Village in connection with the review of this application.
2) The Applicant shall install landscaping on property at 14 Woodland Drive,Rye Brook,NY,adjacent and parallel to
the length of the proposed garage to the satisfaction and approval of the Village Planning Board and Michael and
Lauren Cazakoff. Such landscaping shall be consistent with the landscaping proposed in the mitigation area as
shown on Sheet SP-04. Such landscaping shall be shown on the Applicant's submission to the Village Planning
Board for the April 21,2022,meeting.
3) The Applicant shall not expand the proposed garage structure in anyway or construct any addition to the proposed
garage structure or to the existing dwelling,not otherwise approved by this Resolution,which encroaches into the
required yard setbacks. The Applicant shall not increase the width,length,height or area of the proposed one-story
frame two car garage and proposed mud room enclosure,as shown on Sheet SP-02 last revised on February 28,
2022.
Steve Berger
One,Board I'll need your input,the variances will or will not create an adverse impact to the character.
Joel Simon
Will not.
Glenn Brettschneider
Will not.
Page 20 of 36
Zoning Board of Appeals
April 5,2022
Steve Berger
Will not.Jamie, Okay.Jamie?
Jamie Schutzer
I froze for a second what was the.
Steve Berger
Adverse impact on the neighborhood?
Jamie Schutzer
I would say would not
Steve Berger
The benefit the applicant seek can or cannot be achieved through another method feasible for the applicants to pursue that
does not require the variances
Joel Simon
Cannot.
Steve Berger
Glenn?
Glenn Brettschneider
Cannot,I agree?
Steve Berger
Jamie?
Jamie Schutzer
Yeah,I would say cannot,I'm not sure all of them.But I mean there's,but I would say cannot.
Steve Berger
And the Chair says cannot.The variances are substantial.
Joel Simon
Yes.
Jamie Schutzer
Yes.
Glenn Brettschneider
Yes.
Steve Berger
The variances will or will not create any adverse impacts to the physical or environmental conditions of the neighborhood.
Page 21 of 36
Zoning Board of Appeals
April 5,2022
Joel Simon
Will not.
Steve Berger
Will not.
Glenn Brettschneider
Will not.
Jamie Schutzer
Yes,I agree.
Steve Berger
And the need for variances is or is not self-created?
Joel Simon
Is not.
Steve Berger
Is not,okay.Drew,do you have some conditions for us?
Drew Gamils
Yes,I do.Applicant shall install landscaping on property at 14 Woodland Drive adjacent to and parallel to the length of the
proposed garage,subject to approval and satisfaction of the Planning Board and Mr.Cazakof£Such landscaping shall be
consistent with the landscaping proposed in the mitigation area,as shown on sheet SP-04 such landscaping shall be shown on
the applicants Planning Board submission for the April 215t Planning Board meeting. Condition number two,no expansion of
the proposed garage in the width,length or height shall occur.And I can clean that up further.But that's it.
Steve Berger
Yeah,I would say more than the garage but the building because in case you have a garage that they want to a den or
something so it's of the building.And they can put a second floor.I would like to be in there.
Drew Gamils
Yeah,that was what the height is currently one story,but I will specifically reference the one story.
Steve Berger
We've got to say more than just extending the garage.It's got to be adding any type of construction in the back. Okay.
Drew Gamils
And I'll specify the dimensions as well,in that condition.
Steve Berger
All right, Glenn?
Glenn Brettschneider
Yes.
Page 22 of 36
Zoning Board of Appeals
April 5,2022
Steve Berger
Jamie?
Jamie Schutzer
Yes.
Steve Berger
Joel?
Joel Simon
Yes.
Steve Berger
And Chair votes yes. Congratulations.With Mr.Moscato recused,four votes to none. Congratulations Mr. O'Brien,Mr.
Cazakof£Thank you for your participation and your input.
Dan O'Brien
Thank you,everyone.
Michael Gismondi
Thank you.
Glenn Brettschneider
Good luck.
Drew Gamils
And Mr. O'Brien,everyone's aware of the Planning Board. I know I just said it quick in the submission. It's the April 215t
meeting.It was pushed back a week because of Holy Thursday.
Dan O'Brien
215t, Okay.And is that I'm sorry,Drew,is that in person? Or is that?
Drew Gamils
Yes,that's going to be in person for the Planning Board.
Dan O'Brien
Oki-.
Steve Berger
To my fellow Board members,Don is going to take over as chair I am going to excuse myself,I am not feeling real well,and I
stayed through this to get this one done.But I'm going to excuse myself right now.I am sorry, see you next month.
Glenn Brettschneider
Feel better, Steve.
Michael Gismondi
Thank you.
Page 23 of 36
Zoning Board of Appeals
April 5,2022
Joel Simon
Feel better.
Steve Berger
Thanks.
1.3. #22-008
Juan Vincente Idrovo Tenelanda
27 Wilton Road
Legalize one car attached garage with breezeway and finished 2nd floor constructed under
Building Permit#126 dated 4/12/1957.
Don Moscato
Thank you very much,Steve. Under difficult circumstances,the next the next application,Drew,do we have the representative
on the line before I introduce it?
Drew Gamils
We do they just raised their hand I'm going to promote them to panelists.
Don Moscato
Okay,the next application is application number 22-008 Juan Vincente Idrovo Tenelanda 27 Wilton Road,Rye Brook,New
York.Applicant proposes to legalize one car attached garage with breezeway and finish second floor construction under
building permit number 126 dated 4/12/1957.Mickey,could you sort of give a bit of an intro to this particular application
why it is before us?And the history behind it?
Michael Izzo
Yes, sir.I can,Mr. Chairman.Let's see. It was a sunny day in April of 1957.Wait,not that part. So yeah,the work was
permitted in 57,and here's the,here's the permit from 1957.Breezeway garage finish room in an attic.So,all this work was
permitted.And plans were provided and indicated at that time that the construction was proposed to be 10 feet from the
property line which is consistent with the zoning code. On unfortunately,as happens from time to time,the ensuing
construction took place and there was never a CO requested by the by the applicant issued by the Building Department.And
here we are later on presentation of the as built survey,which memorializes where the actual construction went up and it's only
9.4 feet from the from the property line. So,this was,this was an oops factor.Believe it or not,those things did happen 60
years ago.So that's basically where we are right now.
Joel Simon
Are we correct?And presuming it's not the same owner?
Michael Izzo
Let's see now,Fleming.Yeah.So,I think that's a I think that's a correct assumption.
Don Moscato
And,Mickey,what is the situation with respect to the second floor?
Page 24 of 36
Zoning Board of Appeals
April 5,2022
Michael Izzo
Well,it was permitted along with the along with the garage addition.And we needed plans to verify what the use was up there
because we don't have anything on the plan. It was just shown as,as an empty space.And now we have those plans prepared
by an architect in good standing and we're ready to move forward with the legalization and compliance with all the life safety
standards under the under the current New York State Residential Code.
Jamie Schutzer
Out of curiosity.How did this come up?Did you say?
Michael Izzo
I'm not sure. I know that I received a telephone call.At some point in time,someone had noticed that there was an open
permit.I believe that there's a either a sale or refinance pending.And,you know,this is how this is how we can become aware
of these things,generally speaking.
Don Moscato
Okay, fine.Mr. Coakley.I see a familiar person here.Two applications in a row.Congratulations. Do you want to speak to the
application?Drew,is he?Okay,please continue.
Vincent Coakley
Thank you very much.Thank you.All you. I think my introduced rather well there. If I can share my screen,I can walk you
through it in a little bit more detail.
Drew Gamils
Sure.Hold on.All right.You should be all set.
Vincent Coakley
Should be can you see that?
Michael Izzo
Not yet.
Vincent Coakley
Oh,now?
Michael Izzo
Drew,can you help him with this in some manner?
Drew Gamils
Sure.You're all set to share.Vinny are your material,were they submitted to the ZBA.
Vincent Coakley
Yes,there were.
Drew Gamils
Which if you just let me know which one,I should pull up.I can pull it up for you.
Page 25 of 36
Zoning Board of Appeals
April 5,2022
Vincent Coakley
I don't have your agenda list here in front of me.
Drew Gamils
It's okay.Are we looking at your plans?
Michael Izzo
What page Vin?
Vincent Coakley
Look at the plans?Yeah,if you could walk through the plans. That's perfect.
Michael Izzo
Which page should she open up,Vin?
Vincent Coakley
Start at the first one?
Michael Izzo
That's C.01 Drew.
Vincent Coakley
Yes.Yeah.And we can just scroll through them there.Thank you very much Drew.
Drew Gamils
No problem. Can everyone see my screen?
Glenn Brettschneider
Yes.
Vincent Coakley
So that's the property on the top left there from Google Maps.You can't see I guess you can't see my mouse there.But on the
lower side of the structure is the original house it was built in 1950.And you can see the breezeway and the garage further up.
You see what I've done,what I've done with the aerial view on the top left of the drawing,yes.So that there is the structure in
question.That was,I guess,probably in 1957.But the permit was never closed out.Right under the just to the right of the
Google red teardrop there at the front of the house,that is a piece that sticks out.There was a permit filed for that in I believe
1990.And the drawings for that permit also show the structure that we're talking about. So obviously,it was it was built by
1990.And we believe it was built at the time the permit was filed in 1957.If we can go to the to the next drawing so that area
on the main area of the houses is obviously on the left,there.The area on the right is the area that we need the variance for
now because of the setbacks and if you can scroll down just a little bit. So,there is a there's a little summary of how the
permitting process panned out.So,the original structure you see there,just to the left of that dotted line.Number one,the
original structure was permitted in 1950.The garage and breezeway were permitted in 1957.But the CO was never obtained.
And that little covered porch was permitted in 1989-1990.And in the drawings for that we have kind of a poor copy,the work
to the right.That was originally parameters in 1957 is shown on those drawings. If you'd like to go to the next one.So that
that's the second floor.There is some information on the drawings here that are related to the building permit that as Mickey
said,they were partly addressed maybe in these drawings,but they will need to be addressed subsequently.Anyway,for the
issuance of building permits.If you d like to go to the last sheet,that is a copy of that 1990 permit application drawing.You
see in the bottom left,the front elevation of the house,little porch in the center,is what that permit was for.But you can also
Page 26 of 36
Zoning Board of Appeals
April 5,2022
see the garage and breezeway on the right. So obviously,it existed at that point,it appears that it was built in 1957 when the
permit was originally filed.So,there are two variances, the side yard required. side yard setback is 10 feet.The actual side yard
setback right now,according to a recent survey is 9.4 feet.The rear yard,the required rear yard setback is 30 feet.And the
actual to that little porch,and brick wall at the back is 20 feet. So,they're the two variances that we are seeking to in order to
legalize the existence structure.
Don Moscato
Okay,thank you,Mickey,have you inspected that second floor completion?Or what is the sequence for that?
Michael Izzo
Well,there's no point in inspecting anything if the Zoning Board is going to make them rip it out.So generally,we won't
perform an inspection until the required variances granted.And that's when the inspection and the follow up either have some
action that the applicant needs to take if there's some construction that needs to ensue,or some other measures that need to
bring it into compliance.That's when that takes place.It's after these proceedings.
Don Moscato
Okay,thank you,the fact that it's been in existence for so long,and I was looking to see whether or not there were any
comments from neighbors,or anyone else who saw the signage for whether or not they were for or against the application,it
seems to me the options are tear it down,or leave it as is the way it's been for the last several decades.And most of the times
in these situations,I think the Board has typically said we're going to leave it the way it is,unless there is a severe
environmental issue or character issue.That's been my understanding of the past.Does any Board member have any questions
for Mr. Coakley at this time?
Joel Simon
No.
Don Moscato
No.Okay.Is there anyone in the listening audience who wants to speak in favor of the application?Drew any hands up?
Drew Gamils
We have no attendees.
Don Moscato
So,we went from 18 to zero,is that 18 to one?
Drew Gamils
Yeah.Don,your phone number is the one that ends with 2404 Correct?
Don Moscato
That is correct.
Drew Gamils
Okay,yep.There are no attendees.And then if anybody else is a panelist who would like to speak,you should have the ability
to unmute yourself
Page 27 of 36
Zoning Board of Appeals
April 5,2022
Don Moscato
Okay.My other question is,anyone submit any letters that we have not received to this point?In terms of support or against
the application?
Michael Izzo
The building department has received no such correspondence from the public or anybody else.
Don Moscato
All right,thank you.Does anyone have any questions of Mr. Coakley before I have a motion to close the public hearing?
Okay,there being none.Enjoy that beverage.David. Okay. Can I have a motion to close public hearing?
Joel Simon
So,moved.
Don Moscato
Okay.
Jamie Schutzer
Seconded.
Don Moscato
Okay. Public Hearing is closed.I think from the point of view of past experience,unless anyone has any,any questions.I think
it's basically a decision to go ahead with the resolution.Anyone want to comment on that?Okay,I'm just trying to bring it up
on my screen here. Okay,there we go. Okay,just bear with me for a sec. Okay. I will quickly go through the five factors.And
then when we get to it,I'll just jump right over them. In terms of the five factors do we feel that there are any environmental
issues with this with this application.
Joel Simon
No.
Don Moscato
No.How about the issue with respect to the character the neighborhood?I don't think it's going to affect the character of the
neighborhood.Would you say was self-created at some point in time in the past?
Joel Simon
Not by this owner?
Don Moscato
I think the variances are significant.Were you okay with that?
Joel Simon
Yes.
Jamie Schutzer
Well,the one is significant,and one isn't.
Page 28 of 36
Zoning Board of Appeals
April 5,2022
Don Moscato
Yeah,one is de minimis,but I want to put down that they are it is substantial and as much as the numeration of the two of
them okay.
Jamie Schutzer
Right.
Don Moscato
Let me go ahead with the application then.
Page 29 of 36
Zoning Board of Appeals
April 5,2022
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS,application has been made to the Zoning Board by Juan Vincente Idrovo Tenelanda (the
"Applicant") for (1) a single side yard setback variance of 0.6 feet where the minimum required single side yard setback is 10
feet pursuant to Village Code 5 250-22.G(2)(a),and(2) a rear yard setback variance of 10 feet where the minimum required
rear yard setback is 30 feet pursuant to Village Code §250-22.G(3),in connection with the proposed legalization of a one car
attached garage with breezeway and finished second floor constructed under Building Permit#126 dated 4/12/1957,on
property located at 27 Wilton Road,in an R-10 zoning district on the west side of Wilton Road,approximately 100 feet from
the intersection of Wilton Circle and Wilton Road. Said premises being known and designated on the tax map of the Village of
Rye Brook as Parcel ID#135.66-1-50;and
WHEREAS,a duly advertised public hearing was held on April 5,2022,at which time all those wishing to be heard
were given such opportunity;and
WHEREAS,the public hearing was closed on April 5,2022;and
WHEREAS,the proposed action is a Type II action pursuant to the New York State Environmental Quality Review
Act and accordingly,no further environmental review is required;and
WHEREAS, the Board, from the application, after viewing the premises and neighborhood concerned, and upon
considering each of the factors set forth in Village Code 5 250-13(G)(b)[2][a]-[e] of the Rye Brook Code, fords with respect to
the requested variances that:
1) The variances WILL NOT create an adverse impact to the character of the neighborhood;
2) The benefit the Applicants seek CANNOT be achieved through another method, feasible for the Applicants to
pursue,that does not require the variances;
3) The variances ARE substantial;
4) The variances WILL NOT create any adverse impacts to the physical or environmental conditions of the
neighborhood; and
5) The need for the variances IS NOT self-created;and
NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the said application for (1) a single side yard setback variance of
0.6 feet where the minimum required single side yard setback is 10 feet pursuant to Village Code 5 250-22.G(2)(a),and(2) a rear
Page 30 of 36
Zoning Board of Appeals
April 5,2022
yard setback variance of 10 feet where the minimum required rear yard setback is 30 feet pursuant to Village Code 5 250-22.G(3),
in connection with the proposed legalization of a one car attached garage with breezeway and finished second floor constructed
under Building Permit #126 dated 4/12/1957, on property located at 27 Wilton Road is hereby GRANTED on the following
conditions:
1) No permit or certificate of occupancy shall be issued until the Applicants have paid in full all application and
consultant fees incurred by the Village in connection with the review of this application.
2) The Applicant shall not construct any additional stories on top the one-story one-car garage or increase the height
of the one-story garage in anyway as shown on the plans last revised on December 28,2021.
3) If the garage is destroyed by more than 50%, such garage shall be reconstructed in compliance with the Village's
required setbacks,unless the Applicant obtains a variance from the Village Zoning Board of Appeals.
Don Moscato
Before I go through with the final section.Do we feel we need to condition the second story addition to that garage to be
consistent with past applications,Joel,how do you feel about that?
Joel Simon
Probably not a bad idea.
Don Moscato
Okay, anyone else feel comfortable with adding that condition?
Jamie Schutzer
That's fine.
Glenn Brettschneider
What about,I remember we had a similar a similar garage or something.And I seem to recall that if something happened
naturally to that garage,that the variance doesn't continue on for the new structure.Do you remember that?
Don Moscato
I think if it's destroyed more than 50%,there was a number of somewhere around there,that it would have to comply to the
new code.If it was going to be taken down and rebuilt Mickey,is that correct?
Michael Izzo
Well,the code,the code states that I mean,once,once you grant the variance,let's say you do grant an unconditional variance,
then it becomes like any other structure in Rye Brook and the code,the language of the code says,if it's destroyed by active
man or God,you re allowed to rebuild it right in the exact same place,as long as that construction ensues within one calendar
year of the event.
Page 31 of 36
Zoning Board of Appeals
April 5,2022
Joel Simon
But we've had we have had conditions in the past under somewhat similar circumstances,where we said if it's replaced as
opposed to being repaired,then they could not rebuild it,it would have to conform.
Glenn Brettschneider
Yeah,there was one it was it was I remember,was like an old an older,standalone garage,that a corner of it was over the
setback line and maybe like a year and a half ago or two years. I just remember that.That's why I was just curious if that's.
Joel Simon
No,I don't remember the structure.But I remember that we've had have had similar circumstances,where if you know,if
you're,if they're fixing a wall,that's one thing,if they're,if they're what amounts to rebuilding it,or doing major structural,
then that they couldn't put it,put it back as it would have to be,it would have to conform under that circumstance.
Drew Gamils
We,in rare circumstances,the ZBA has adopted that type of condition,we typically try and stay away from it.Because when
you think about your evaluation of the five factors,you know,here,the five factors lean towards what sounds like an approval
of the variances,if this structure is completely demolished by a hurricane,and they build the exact same structure.Does your
analysis of the five factors change?
Don Moscato
I wouldn't put it next to the property line.I would have an issue with that.It would enter into the deliberation,wouldn't it?
Joel Simon
I think we don't Yeah,I think it definitely would and also the same way when you ask whether they can achieve their goal by
in some other means.Yeah,they could build it in conformity.
Don Moscato
Yeah. So,I don't have a problem with those two conditions Drew,one being nothing on top of it.And secondly,you know if
it gets demolished by man or God or nature or some whatever,exotic fireworks,would you be open to those two Drew s
already when I get to that point?
Drew Gamils
Yes.
Don Moscato
Okay.All right.Drew,what I failed to do is to ask the applicants agent,whether or not they are comfortable with the
conditions that the Zoning Board would like to impose on this on this requested variance.
Vincent Coakley
Yeah,I assume what the condition means is that if the if the garage is destroyed,they can't build it in the same place without.
They can't build it in the same place period.But we're only talking about it.If they built it the way it was supposed to be built
in the first place, seven inches farther in,they can still file for a permit to do such thing.
Joel Simon
And there's a line between repair versus reconstruction.If there's damage,sufficient that it's a reconstruction as opposed to
simply a repair,that crosses that line where it could not be rebuilt in the same in the same location.
Page 32 of 36
Zoning Board of Appeals
April 5,2022
Vincent Coakley
Thank you.I don't see the necessity for the condition,but I'm not in a position to object to it.
Don Moscato
Okay,thank you. So,Drew will go ahead with our,do you have them available,or you want to just get them to me at a later
time,
Drew Gamils
I think I have it,I might clean them up a little bit more.But condition number two,that the applicant shall not construct any
additional stories on top of the one story one car garage or increase the height of the garage in any way. If the garage is,
condition three,if the garage is destroyed by more than 50%such garage shall be reconstructed in compliance with the
required setbacks,unless a variance is approved by the Zoning Board of Appeals.
Don Moscato
Thank you very much.Are we comfortable with that type?
Joel Simon
Can I raise a question,that breezeways is open?Correct?That's,it's an open area.Right?
Michael Izzo
Briefly,it's just a roof.
Joel Simon
Right?So,do we want them where it can't be enclosed?You know,it has to remain open.Is something we'd want to consider.
Vincent Coakley
So,the breezeway is,is it's open to the rear.It's not open at the front,there's a there's a doorway at the front.
Joel Simon
I understand but as opposed to making a lack of a better term,a closed structure.
Michael Izzo
Like to put in like the enclose it with a window and put heat and use it as part of the.
Joel Simon
Adds walls,you know, four walls around,you know,completely closing.
Vincent Coakley
Well,I think to do such a thing would require a permit, and you'd be back to square one,it would require a permit and so on a
variance if that was needed, and so on.
Michael Izzo
Well,you wouldn't need a variance if you were,Vin,if you were just going to take out a permit to condition the space.And,
you know,because you got to remember Joel that it's kind of like a tube,you know,on one half,you've got the home. On the
other half,you got the wall,that's the garage,and you got the roof in front,you got a door and the back it's open.So that's like
a tube open on one end. So,there wouldn't be any variance required if they wanted to go in putting a wall in the back or open
up the wall or the home condition it and they kind of like expand the home into that existing area between the home and the
Page 33 of 36
Zoning Board of Appeals
April 5,2022
garage,they would eat up the breezeway,it would become conditioned space.You wouldn't need a variance to do that.But if
the Zoning Board wants to condition that they can't do that,
Joel Simon
I withdraw that.You're right.I don't see any reason for that.
Don Moscato
I would agree.Joel. I would agree. Okay,thank you. Okay,are we ready to take a vote?
Joel Simon
Yes.
Glenn Brettschneider
Yes.
Don Moscato
Steve is excused, Glenn?
Glenn Brettschneider
Yes.
Don Moscato
Jamie?
Jamie Schutzer
Yes.
Don Moscato
Joel?
Joel Simon
Yes.
Don Moscato
Don?Yes. Okay.Application approved four yeses,one excused,congratulations.And good luck with the,with the sale or
whatever of the cleaning up of the property is we appreciate that.
Vincent Coakley
Thank you.
2. SUMMARY APPROVALS:
2.1. Approval of January 4,2022 Zoning Board Summary
2.2. Approval of February 1,2022 Zoning Board Summary
Page 34 of 36
Zoning Board of Appeals
April 5,2022
Don Moscato
Okay,thank you.The only other two things we have are the Zoning Board minutes of January and February.I read through
them. I don't have a problem with them.I kind of liked the new format does waste a lot of space,but it is very easy to read.
So,can I have a motion to approve both of those minutes for January and February,please?
Jamie Schutzer
So,moved.
Glenn Brettschneider
Move to approve minutes.
Don Moscato
Second?
Joel Simon
Second.
Don Moscato
Okay,minutes are approved. Can I have motion to close public hearing?
Joel Simon
So,moved.
Glenn Brettschneider
Motion to close.
Don Moscato
Public hearing is closed.Thanks again.And we'll wait to see what our format is going to be for our next meeting in May at
least we know we have one application any the other in the pipeline Mickey.
Michael Izzo
Well,the only one that comes to mind is the Garibaldi one.That's the only one I can think of
Don Moscato
Okay,well,if they decide to adjourn again,we might see each other in June.If not,that will be May 3=d. Goodnight,everyone.
Drew Gamils
Guys,wait.You'll find this funny.When we got that email about the video,I first tried to watch it to confirm whether the
public hearing was closed.I got so flustered with what was going on,had my husband watch the video.The whole thing
because I wanted to make absolutely certain what the status was.So,I made him watch all of 12 Woodland.
Joel Simon
We need a motion to adjourn.Don't we though?
Drew Gamils
Yeah.
Page 35 of 36
Zoning Board of Appeals
April 5,2022
Joel Simon
A motion to close.
Drew Gamils
A motion to close.
Don Moscato
Yeah,okay. Good night,everyone.
Joel Simon
Good night.
Page 36 of 36
Building Permit Check List&Zoning Analysis
• Address: 2 SBL• 1 22
Zone L •1 o Use: Const.Type: II Other:
Submittal Date: 4I I Z S Revisions Submittal Dates:
Applicant: -e-t-ivy.-K N G
Nature of Work: G-F L d L-t-7 7 C A F���
t N lS tF 3�. Z- nla+ tI�DDti / ZKAai 22EV'� 000F
Reviews:ZBA: 4 2021 PB: BOT: Other.
OK
( ( ) FEES:Filing: BP: C/O: Legalization:
( ) (_.'APP: Dated ✓ Notarized: SBL: /Thus I.D. Cross Connection: H.O.A.:
( ) ( ) Scenic Roads: Steep Slopes: Wetlands: Storm Water Review: Street Opening
( ) ( ) ENVIRO:Long. Shore Fees: N/A:
( ) ( ) SITE PLAN:Topo: Site Protection: S/W Mgmt.: Tree Plan: Other.
( ) ( ) SURVEY:Dated Current: Archival• Sealed. Unacceptable:
( ) (-J'PLANS:Date Stamped Sealed ✓Copies: y Electronic Other.
( ) ( ) License: Workers Comp: Liability Comp.Waiver. Other.
( ) ( ) CODE 753#: Dated N/A:
(Jf ( ) HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRICAL:Plans: Permit N/A: Other.
( ) ( ) LOW-VOLTAGE ELECTRICAL:Plans: Permit: N/A: Other.
(� ( ) FIRE ALARM/SMOKE DETECTORS:Plans: Permit: H W.I.C.:_Battery:_Other.
PLUMBING:Plans: Permit: Nat. Gas: LP Gas: N/A/: Other.
( ) ( ) FIRE SUPPRESSION:Plans: Permit: N/A: Other.
(� ( ) H.V.A.C.: Plans: Permit N/A: Other.
( ) ( ) FUEL TANK:Plans: Permit Fuel Type: Other.
( ) ( ) 2020 NY State EC C: N/A: Other.
( ) (Jf Final Survey: ✓ Final Topo: RA/PE Sign-off Letter. As-Built Plans: Other.
BP DENIAL LETTER: ✓ C/O DENIAL LETTER: Other.
( ) ( ) Other.
( ARB mtg.date: approval:- notes:
(�ZBA mtg.date kl 5 22- approval:-. ti Z2 notes: ZZ D D 0
( )PB mtg.date: approval notes:
REQUIRED EXISTING PROPOSED NOTES
Ama;
Cir
Fr n
Front:
Front:
Sid i 2 - S''`1 2 O- Z Z . Z. Q o, U .e. T1-£
r -S 0 Z _ Z 29D -Z'Z .G, 3 I o ' , A n- TZ.,F-Q:Z-
Main Cov
Acts,Cor.
F S
S .HS •
Tot,Imp
F Im :
Parking
HH6& Stories:
notes:
DD AV Oliver Engineering, P.C.
FF7EB - 022 cr Design-Permit Applications-Legalizations
Code Compliance-Project Supervision
VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK 62 Dora Street, Stamford, CT 06902
BUILDING DEPARTMENT 188 North Main Street, Port Chester, NY 10573
(914)774.9878 www.proeng.nyc vcCproeng.nyc
LETTER OF RANSMITTAL
February 9, 2022
On behalf of Property Owner: In reference to: Prepared by:
Juan Idrovo ZBA Application for Oliver Engineering, P.C.
27 Wilton Road 27 Wilton Road 188 North Main Street,#207
Rye Brook,NY 10573 Rye Brook,NY 10573 Port Chester, NY 10573
Transmitted to: By:
Village of Rye Brook Hand: ✓ 938 King Street
Building Dcpa tmcnt .A
938 King Street Email: ✓ Tara Gerardi<tgerardi@ryebrook.org>
Rye Brook,NY 10573 Other: ✓ Copy on thumb drive
In reference to our Application to the Zoning Board of Appeals, please find enclosed, as follows:
• Letter of Disapproval from the Building Department
• Completed, signed and notarized Original Zoning Variance Application
• Two copies of October 28, 2021 Survey of the Subject Property
• Two (2)Sets of Sealed Plans, 24"x18"
• One Reduced Plan Set, 11"x17"
• Non-refundable Application Fee: Check#11049 in the amount of$350.00
• Escrow Account Fee; Check#11050 in the amount of$1,000.00
• One electronic copy(thumb drive) of the above items
Notarized Mailer and Sign Affidavits to follow
Regarding this Transmittal:
As noted, digital copies of the above documents, along with this (Letter of Transmittal), are also being
transmitted electronically(by email)to tgerardi@ryebrook.org
Please contact us should the contents of this Transmittal be incomplete or not in order.
Sincerely,
UL��- February 9, 2022
Vincent Coakley, P.E.—P incipal, Oliver Engineering, P.C. Date
OLIVER ENGINEERING, P.C. JOB �27 P,.A' �
163 North Main Street, #207 SHEET NO. OF
Port Chester, NY 10573
(914) 774-9878 CALCULATED BY DATE
www.ProEng.nyc CHECKED BY DATE
SCALE
AD IL U"l '� ��
DEC 2 7 2021
VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK
f BUILDING DEPARTMENT
Tl you
sh--%!-Ael-� a v J Z"c.v Id AA 4s�
7
64
133HS LVZ X J0 0 HOMV NV NO 1NINd Ol a3-1V3S Si ONIMV UC3 SIHI I SJNIMVRIa 31V0S.LON Oa
MOOH13 3A2i�O __
30V711A 3H1 A9'JNIMV HG IN I AVd=in a m = VOZ H380130 SID A1Nnoo 113iS3H31S3M
NO Q3SV S`03nSSl SI 11Wa 2 P" A3AHns ddW Xdl
Wl AINO GNd):JI N0110n211
a0:i anvA SI JNIMV H(3 I Il
N S 1lVQ N100'11VW90Vs1VI1nVd00:1N"3 9Z99£-LZ0Z89 'ON TULL
ZZZ 419Z-90Z(9tL)XdJ f'
_ 833 s tr6£L Z99(LL6)3N0Hd3131 �: i
I�ZOZ'8 t•'Z I, a310 d 1 H,� 0 £D t L *KN 'V01VWer
ZL l t+Z-
�£P6
�31d0 �3 ��/s 3(1N3Ad 'ONI'1.0N3Jd 30NtRJnSNI 31111 311NF21J 1HNOIIVN'£
S,0061 Ol AV N Z-SO?l003?� ANVdW00 30NVanSN1 31111 1VNOLLVN A11130IJ'Z
• syi� VONVI3N31 OA08a1 31N30NIA NVnr'L
S2lO k3 8nS ONVI V A110
o-nd Mmmns GNVI VSIVI :01 C1331Nvwno
:2138WnN JNIM"O "
,p�, MOA3AanS 3H1 01 03HSIN21n3 SI TLM 30 IOV81SBV NV 31 a331NVHYn0 AINO 38V aNO038 30 S1NYUSV3'S
S31d03 PHI aIIVA 38 Ol 038301SNOO 38 IIVHS'N3S a3SS08W3 SIH
�Q 80 1V3S 03NNI S,wA3A2JnS OM/1 3H1 30 WN19180 NV H11M 03NM A3AanS SIHI 30 IVNIDISO 3H1 VfOW S31dO3 AINO'4
MVl NOI1VOna3
133HS 113A00 31V1S NaOA M3N 3Hi 30 60ZL N01133S.40 NOlIV101A V SI AamnS SIHI Ol NOLLIaav 80 NOLLVa31IV 03ZIdoHINNn'£
A3A2lnS SIHI 30 18Vd SV a33VId ION 383M S1N3MInNOV4 83NHOD AL83dO8d'Z
:3WdN JNIMV2IQ �S(]�� 'Sa3NMO 1N3no3sens ao
SNOLLn1J1SNI WNOWOaV 01 318V213JSNVd1 LON 3HV SNOLLVOIJLL833 80 S331NvHVno'N011l11if NI ONION31 3Hl 30 S33NDISSY �
3Hl Ol ONV'N0383H 031sn NOJ1n111SNI ONION31 ONV A3N30V IYIMVIN83AOO'ANVdWOO Mi 3H1 01 3IVH39 SIN NO OW r
03HVd3ad Si A3mnS 3H1 WOHM 803 NOS83d 3H1 Ol A1N0 Nn8 TWS N030H a31VO10N1 SNOLI.VOIALW30 80 S331NV8VnD'L
NOIld0l1ddd'O d0'0 �3n:3ns 3-wl �ZOZ L48Z 83eoioo :S31ON
:3WVN 1o3f oNd NOUAMOS30 3 vc3
ti90L*ON dM SV 096L '41LL AVW 031U
6£'ON 101 SV NMONN
1,S111H 3AN 30 dWL 09'°N -
dvN a3113 10l Q3-11=1
60'3IlIWN3d Hod MZ'8Z'Z I• ativk
M31A321 aOd tZ0Z'8�'Z 163M 01F
:3nSSl :31H0 1�� ,00 00 I. 3 „00,51..ZZ S /-"'��►
M8 a/CV �el!!A`cs 33dSN1�ll�] 3ON33 3?!IM aNV a00M X/ X/
X/ X/ X/ X/ 3ON33 DOOM 1S31N'9'b
ILl?lm�1F
'aj MGM
tli�(lli IG4M,b't+ N1110S,t►'I
'3j 0Ad
I SddW 310000
N011V301
a3 Mddd 31V
Z 8 d
-,%
VINVMvnO d0 avis c ._• a21VA 3Nn o ,
T1tlM�ORIB � �
� z
CUM13 10
J Z Hobod 3008 1 Z Q
I 6£'ON WINoN,s0
m 10'1=1:3 11VM09.V99T 1, 411
10-1 CM1=1 to I
,b'6£ 0WA
AN`)I00118 3AH o' o
. w � 0
N � N�' ov'ON N011IM 1Z te
L�O l �N 100J8Lzor omna 10� 3�13
:SS32a0d Albd02d > t�...
JW�W A?l015 ZI I I _ �6c
ti M°N,97 aAd 'pa UOlI!M Lz
z< "f
08VA rn ti�. '3:1 aOQm
Il1.fIOS�I'Z
0
(Z OiSS3 '3J:)Ad
1
.z �a'� 9L W01 d0� ,L'Z 1 ,b'6
r
Oo
o ate_ Z�v 1 s goals 3ooa
IdO3 All
N M 88n3 3NOIS
tl o O
,1K 88n3 3NOiS )t1VM 3NOLSOVlj m CA
M C -
d'O o0 1N dy z
443N 30�1 co `" 08VA fn
dwvls .J liOl f E.1 Eft�ti,i 1r'1:D,:►ILICCJ
z3
<n
D> SddW 319000
>0. ,�ommmowZ8 a° M31A IVIN3d< oo � oo5Zo �
03AVd 3NO1S
3
O
Z
G
D t�
88n3 1332iLS iltlHdSV
Gvo� NODIM
:dwvlS
r
z
co
3 N Co
> >0
CA
0-0 In
3 _ - f
o Yz }
'9 M 09*10-1 Xdl L:>10019 Xdl 99'96 L:NOL1038 XVI
•o— 0)3 C)m 3AH=10 NM01
c 0'-0�. N D 'A'N'JliNn00 d31S3H0183M—>100d8 BAH 30 3Jdl�in
to 1 = 0 c O iv a3ivn11 �iH3d Ud d dVN _
n p m S O O OM0'MVH 3Aa
� N 0 a,rn 3S13 3NOANV 803 80 S3SOd2Jnd pZ — L :3�dOS �b'NIJf�JO
r►
.< i:13H10 ANV�f03 Oi1VA ION SI 11'031:IVd3ad S`dM 11 WOHM?!03 SNOS213d 3H.L 803 AINO ONV �
'" •� n Z
P . —■ 'J�ON3J`d 30Nb'Hf1SNl 31111311Nb�HJ`1b'N011`dN HOB 03A3/�HnS •r`��� ,,..,
— c A 3 0 y �b K NO SMOdund TULL HOd - ot, oz 0 o f
� ;
C) 0
tD�_ � ON
N • 5
-K4) l/10 -0
■ q S
J'
1< -4 0
f7 W 3 t/l
133HS LVZ X..80 a HOW NV NO 1NIad 01 a31VaS SI JNIM"a SIHl SONIMV2Ia 31V3S ION Oa
30V111A 3H1 AS`JNIMVH(l SIHI
NO a3SVS`a3nsSl Si 11W113d V
Ul A1NO aNV).4I NOLLanHISNOa
mw a11VA SI JNIMVHa SIHI _
:31ON 'NOOl3 ONO03S 3H1 NO(#ZL)lln0b10 H0NVN8 3NO ONV NOOId iS813 3H1 NO'ONIONnObO ONV 13NVd
110014 Isilij 3134 ONIanl0Nl'301AN3S dWV OOL M3N V d0 NOI1V nV1SNl 3H1 bOd 686L'AVW NI 03nSS1 SVM LL££#IIWN3d iVHl 310N
�11££#1IW213d
6ZOZ's v 1� a310N Sd
:31Va :31V3S jo 'ilRN3d 31VNVd3S V 83aNn 03113 •
N0103i3O-0.0 0 £0'S 133HS 33S '31ViS)4UOA M3N 30 3000 IVOINIO313
® 3WI11VH11V 3Nn10nb1S ONIISIX3 3Hi 301NVd SV AVM3Z33b8 ONV 39VbVO 3H130 1VN011VN 3HI ONV 31ViS XbOA M3N d0 3000 lVliN301S3b 3H130 IIIA 1NVd H11M 30NVON000V NI G313ldlNO3 •
o S '80103130 DONS N0110ld30 030nlONl'L£1#'0 30'0 ONV'699#AN`83d H11M 031VIOOSSV SONIMVNO 696 L 'XOONB 3AN 30 3OV111A 3H1 NI XNOM Ol 03SN3011 N010VN1NO01VO1N10313 NV A8 a3W803N3d •
:31ON(V :38 01 SI)MOM 1V3R1103131IV-IVOINIO313
:a38WnN JNIMV21a
06sl•030 03nssl L£1#'o 30.O
A3A8nS IN3NNnO HAM SNOISN3W10 WN13N00. .3I1.LV NI WOOU 3NO 696L'AON 03nSSl 689#llWb3d
HSINId ONV 3OVbVO'AVM3Z33N8.. I HDSOd a3J3A00(E
2100�d 1S 1� 096L 1SOd !L96L'IIN&03nSSi'9ZW 11Wtl3d OS6L IVNIOIbO
:3WVN JNIM"a :03aaV Unions(z
NOIld011ddd.O d00 i�ossl•03a 03nssl`v8z#•o d •
I 056L 3Nnf a3nsSl`OLZ# 3d ����,,� y
:3WVN la3f 021d :3un10nuis IVNIJIt10 4
'000/11Wa3d U0d MZ'8ZOU IF
M31A321 U0d MVS VZ 1
:3nSSi :31Va dad 1.00
Ul
N3M311N
do.,8
Vr1NV>' vno d0 31V1S3
3JV?1VJ
b AVM3Z33HS O
WOMIHIVS
AN N00218 3AU
aV/ON N011IM LZ
:Ss3aaaV AINUGHd
{
NOI S S3.4df0�
Z z ��� gL 6 001 apt
O cil
2 s2�
1p
Li
�4 M J71 MORROW;
m
V3HV
oo IN y,�y � A.11lilfl
413N d0 S +
:dWV1S
Zi
�n
D> El
or
4 a SV3bV ONld331S 3Hi 0130NV8iN3 3H1 d0(WW WC)133J OL NIH11M ONV SV38V ONld331S 3H13O 3aisino
m a 0311VISNI 38 INNS b0103130 TAXONOW N08NVO V'3113N3HOA)l NO N3H0.LlA V Ni a31V301 SI 30NVllddV ONINbn8l3nd V 3N3HM S11Nn JNid331S ONV SIINn ONI113MO NI
'llNn ONld331S NO V3bV 0Nld331S 3HI NI NOliV00103AONddV 3SIM83H10 NO lV81N30 V NI 0311VISNI 38 INNS N0103130
z 301XONOW N08bVO V'33VdS bo'13S010'WOON AlIl11n'WOONHIVB 03HOVilV NV NI 031VO01 SI 30NVI1ddV ONINNn8l3n3 V 3N3HM SIINn 9Nld331S ONV SV3NV ONld331S NI
v do.8
:SNOIld30X3
n '30NVIlddV ONINbnB-13n3 V NIVINOO 1VHl SIINn ONld331S ONV
'SV3NV ONld331S'SIINn JN1113M0'30VdS 318VIdn000'SWOON 11V NI SONIOIins IVION3WW00 ONV SONIOlIn81VIIN30IS3N Ni 0311VISNI 38 IIVHS N01103130 301XONOW N08NVO
:dWb1S :SM01103 SV ONV'3IV1S NNOA M3N d0 3000 3NI3 3H1 dO 9L6 N01103S HAM 30NVON000V NI 0301AONd 38 IIVHS SW8V1V 301XONOW N08NVO
31VIS NWOA M3N 30 WOO 3111d 3H130 V%6 N01103S 213d SWIIVIV 3alXONOW NOSSY3
J
011Vd WS 313HONOD 71
W w o N3MOd IVION3WWOO lnOHIIM SONI011n8 NI 0311V1SNl RGHM G31VH3dO AN311V8 38 01 03111W213d 38 IIVHS SWNVIV DONS
00 D + lV31dAl a31d)l0la8 HOHOd
o ;'3 3aVf1DS.ZL NO 1SOd 9X9 a3213A0� 'SWbVIV SNOWS 30 n3ll NI 03sn 38 0103111Wb3d 38 IIVHS SWNVIV 301XONOW N08bVO ONV 3XOWS NOIIVNI8W00
? 00 0 4 3 MNV1V 3NO 30 NOIIVAIIOV NOdn ONnos sWbV1V llV ONV 0311V1SNI 38V SWNVIV SS313NIM 031S113N3HM 03biw3b 38 ION IIVHS SWNVIV DONS
0° 0 ao 0 n 30 N01103NNOON3INI 1VOISAHd'llNn ON1113M01VnOlAIONI 3H1 NI SWIV NV 3Hi 3011V 31VAIIOV 111M VVWV 3NO 30 NOI1Vn10V 3HI 1VHI N3NNVW V HOnS NI 03103NN00b31NI
CL
avo D <' D V 1 39 llVHS S301A30 WbV1V 3Hl'£•irL£b N01103S HIIM 30NVallo00V NI llNn ONI113Ma 1Vn01AI0Nl NV NIH11M 031IVISNI 38 0103NInD3H SI VWV DOWS 3NO NVHi 3bOW 3N3HM
0. r IVOWAl'dVO 3NOIS H11M :NO1103NNOURNI
3 TOT I 'HJIH.0-.Z'11VM X0188.8
1 N
< 'N01103S SIHl A9 03bIn03b WNVIV DONS V d01N3W30V1d 1N3A3bd O1noM SIHi SS3lNn
o D p m b3MOHS NO 8n1HiV8 V SNIV1NO01VHI WOObH1V8 V d0 ONIN3dO NO NOW 3H1 WONd A11V1NOZINOH(WW K6)133A£NVHi SS31 ION 0311VISNI 38 IIVHS SWNVIV 3XOWS 'b
o 0-0 0 3 D 0 '13A31 83ddn�3H1 M0138 Aaois lend 3NO NVHi SS31 SI 13A3183MOI 3HI IVHI 0301AONd 13A31 N3MOl IN30VrGV 3H1
bOd 301ddnS IIVHS 13A31 b3ddn 3Hi NO 031IV1SNl WNVIV SNOWS V S13A31 IN30VfOV 3Hi N33Mi38 N000 9NIN3Ab31Nl NV InOHIIM ONV S13A31 illdS HAM SIINn ONI113MO
n m O 0 0 0 0 b0 SONI113M0 Ni'S0111V 318V118VHNINn ONV S30VdS lMVbO ONIanlONl ION ONV S0111V 319V118VH ONV SIN3W3SV8 ONIOnlONI'ONIll3M0 3H130 ANOIS 1VN011100V H0V3 NO £
A 7 0,c m 'SWOOba38 3Hi d0 A11N101A 31V103WWI 3H1 NI V3bV ONld331S 31V8Vd3S HOV3 3aisino •Z
y �. n .-I+.0VAL ----�' 'WOON O 'L Nld331S HOV3 NI
N p X :SNOIIVO01 ONIMOIIOd 3H1 NI 0311V1SNI 38 IIVHS SWNVIV 3XOWS
C � O :(31V1S NNOA M3N 30 3000 lVliN3alS3b 3HI 30 W N01103S 83d)SW?JVIV 3XOWS
co(Q n
oK-
pN
N
l< -4 O= 0
� w 7U)
133HS(.JZ X..80 O H311V NV NO 1NINd 01 a31V3S SI JNIMV21a SIHl SONIMVaa 3lV3S ION Oa
MOOHS 3A2130
39Vll1A 3H1 AS'JNIMV21a SIHI
NO a3SVS'a3nSS1 SI 11WU3d V
UI AINO aNV):II NOIlaniuSNOa cco-�6 o cc�
210:i a11VA SI JNIMMI SIH1
:31ON jou v umid aN033S
1 ove vu a310N SV
:31Va :31VOS £0'S 133HS 33S N0103130.0.0 0
'3WIl 1VH11V 3Nn10nN1S 0NIISIX3 3Hi 301NVd SV AVM3Z33N9 ONV 30VNV0 3Hi 30
N0110ld30 03anl3Nl'6£L#'0 30'0 ONV'699#AINN3d H11M 031VIOOSSV SJNIMVNO 6M N0103130 3XOWS
06U'030 03nsSl L£L#'0 30'0
:2139WnN JNIMV210 F—6M'AON 03nSSl 699#IIWN3d
.0111V NI WOOH 3NO HSINI3 ONV 3JVNVJ'AVM3Z33N9. I HOaOd aRMA00(S
'L96 'lladV O3nSS1'9Z011W83d 0961 IVNIDINO
2100i: m :a3aaV 3anionas(z
:3WVN JNIMMI I
096�'030 03nSSI'vgz#'o 3o'o
OM 3Nnf 03nssl'MZ#llVYH3d —�
N011dallddd'0:10'a F:321n10nb1s IVNPDlH0(l
:3WVN la3f Obd I
I
i
I
I
0083/11WHU H0.4 MZORRU ,
M31A3H 2l0:1 MZ'8 VU
:3nSS1 :31Va
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
3SV9
ViNvuvnb;jO 31d1S3 nW0 NO
:1N3113 HMH N31108
•1-9-St• W -IIIi
®0 ----- --------0-------------------------------O-N-11-13-0-0-3-d-O�-lS
-
-t_=
L E9
ILHE
WNHIV9 W®o�039
09-V99£ 1V01dA ..Z-,L iV 1V01dA1.,Z-.11V
ONIII301V13 JNI11301V3 IA --- --- --------------------------------------------
lN N00?8 3121 ---------------------- ---
aVON N011IM 1Z I JNI1130 03dO1S JNI1130 03dOlS
:SS3aaaV Aia3doad ____li3j0S
1HJIlAXS
z<
r- ,\dN01 S S 3�0�
Z 9L100l
00 2 `S'y
LL
0
0 7Dc
� J
�m
v ,>K
in C
d O N W
p Ol dy
:dW`d1S
z3
<
D>
o�J
D
00
0 '60VZJ N01103S H11M 30NVON000V NI A1NO 030n03ZI 38 llVHS S30NVNV310 HOnS'SNOuml1SNl
cn y
0 i M3Nn10V3nNVW ONV DMIS113Hi NI 031JI03dS SV NOIIOn8lSN00 Mausn8W00 01 S30NVNV310
o i` fir 032II OM 3Hl NIVINIVW of O31IV1SNl 38 llVHS S30NVIlddV ONV 1N3WdinO3 ONI0n00ad-1V3H
:S30NVHV310
'v
SN0110nN1SNl S,838n10V3nNVW 30NVllddV 3Hi
'--- H11M 30NVON000V NI HIV N011nlla ONV N0llVlllN3A'Nousn9W00 HAM 0301AONd 39 llVHS'SN3NHn9
dWV1S 0I1Vd 3AO8V 83MOd HIM 03ddin03 S30NVIlddV ONV I AN0031V0 SV C131VNJIS30 lON S30NVIlddV SVJ 031N3A
100H Mij �! , g +^ 'NJIS3013VN01V8n1VN NVHl 83H10 30 S30NVllddV SVJ'S30NVIlddV 1NM-1O3b10'6'LOVZJ HJnONHi
9'LOVZJ SNO1103S NI 0381NOS31dd SOOHI3W 3Hi 30 3NO HIM 30NVON000V NI 030n00N1N138 llVHS
A CO
NIV NOOOino'13W lON 38V(NIV Nousn8W00 N000M)9'LOIZJ N01103S 30 S1N3W3NInD3N 3H1383HM
Z 3 '6'LOVZJ HJnOHHI 5'LOVZD
.~i 4 m ;0 � SNOI103S NI 0381HOS3Nd SOOHAVY 3Hl 30 3NO 30 NOI1V01lddV A8 0301A08d 38 llVHS SJNIOlin9
-'? n 4o0 Ni 031lViSNI S30NVIlddV 803 S3SVJ 3n13 30 N011nlla ONV N0llVlliN3A'NOIisn8W00 NO3 NIV
0 H. 0
� :MIV NOI1sn8W00
24 os. . c0� 0 ! 1
7 < A �r
N O m f '3000 SIHl 30 N0lld00V 3H130 3WII 3Hl 1V 30N31SIX3 NI A1ln3MV1 W31SAS 1V01NVH034 DNIISIX3 NV
19 3 '30 30NVN31NIVW ONV 3sn 03nNI1N00 3Hi AMMd NON'301N3WNOONVSV 80 N011Va311V'IVAOW3N
3H138InD3N lON llVHS 3000 SIHl NI NOISIAOW V'3000 SIHI NI WA 0301A08d 3SIMN3H10 SV 1d30X3
_ 3 M
of 3 m
=D 3 ?.
:SNOIlVllVlSNI DMIS1X3
O cD'� �' 'SJNlalin8 NIHAM SNOI110N001V1N3WNONIAN310NA00 0103sn ONV 0311VJLSNI AliN3NVWN3d
� a a � 0�
0 a; m 3NV 1VHl SW31SAS IVOINVH03W 30 N01103dSNl ONV NOII"311V'30NVN31NIVW'NOI1V1lV1SNl
� 'NOIS3a 3Hi 31V1n)M llVHS 3000 WUN30ISM 3Hi 30 VZ HOnONHi U SU31dVHD 30 SNOISIAONd 3Hl
A N �, n :IV31NVH33W
(p_ tnr 3 0x
oz o�� 04m
ON
?w 3.al
� " 3.0
A W 7 f!1
133HS(..''Z X..90 a HOW NV NO 1N121d Oi amv3s SI ON1MVM0 SIH1 SONimvma 31VaS ION Oa
MOONS 3A21:1O
3OV111A 3H1 A9`ONIM1V21a SIHI
NO a3S\V9`a3f1SSI SI 11WM3d V
(dl AINO ONb).qI NOIlaflHISNOa
mw arivA SI ON m"a SIHl
:31ON
MZ'9 VU a310N Sd
:31da :31d3s 066V6ru awssl'o•a
ONIM"Cl 699#1IWH3d
cons
:213swnN ONIm"a
699#1IWN3d `
:3WVN ONIM"Cl ��-r„1� �:� a ti.�.
..a a- :(+rod 1 1'�.ti Y1 1!"+�!a t
NO11d311ddd'O 30'a
:3WVN 133f 021d
%aw w a ralaa•a
na4■a .NALaLM ift 1•■ �r'wr MTh tom... f
va
5003i11Wa3d aOA LZOZ'9VU 1•LIP115
M31A321 aOd I•ZOZ'96'Z1• '-o.e•Ll d rJ 1711�.Fd .• 1,•✓JS•aT . _ -
:3nssi :31da
d1Nd2 vno jO 31d1S3 �,..._...v •...-.W.
_„_
�1N3113 r ,. .,a;• .
. t
-ate. 1• 'Jt-
,�114i Rr-Igan
LA 4 d'Ifir r e `•
R !f 9pir.•1 r
09-1•-99'£L
AN NOOKS 3A21ILK I
r',,�.•
aVOH NO11IM 1Z ;
:ss3aaad ua3doad . 'pit
1t ,
r•n dNOISS�jQ a"r awaip rp-a m00
,� /a�- ' � I '►�� rMf'����-Thz�!+a�� •a' -
o � v� dMMMwA �...
as 3.ar.e.r
0 7DC � V Ire■■a�atia .,.,.,. i4i I:..w -' t
"'
AOS or
d W V IS
/L.f {-� •.r.• � ...- •. .��1 1 aY i •
trig D :'afi•p w�• I aid• k % ;
$ f6i� 6 M• eL .....
Cir-
o .r a Ewa
Z VM a ll 9CE� aasv, srr.aa
D .1 3mLIHOUV
om w i I
:dWelS
300
3
0U0 �o
_ V,
N —
V Of � .�.
co> > C4> f
0 1CA 0 0 v 2 ,
1
-3m Wall
V_ = 3 m
G� •
T (Q 3 D
—�
0 •c _. O
pc
� 0 oo m m
gyp_ cnr � o-,
r o
O Z 0)k- n N
c� N O NV LA
at
■
-4 0 0
n W �N ■
�<
Nz CZ mzaz �
a)m Z co � O� CC) � r -0Z � a0
rnC/)o z=;d O�
o
� no cln
nm 0Ov
Z F C.)c
Zn cn fi?45Q4� o � 1Q5.13'
tn c
N z Z c i —'� m o ra.m m n WOOD FENCE LOW STONE WALL m '�' o
tWn •`-�< o r rn o =cmr-, •p STONE CURB 4 0
rn m m o co o z -'�'.z.� LOW STONE WALL o g 4 _
o
rn __-� mrn� oz cZn�o cna a��0�'�7 :a -° o '� Z
cn cn z --•� z o cn cn :t,v O b3 m D
cc� O �cz„ gmoz g �F
z .. 0M-n =+� zr-o o = <
czm cmm om -°y $ _ 27.5 m cf)
rnm� o� �zo � v �� _n_105 TORY FRAME ^'
m m m c% =-o oo g o rn cam-, o � _ GARAGE " � (_
n om� v)n mr m __,r. '�7 �. 0
m
cn o v z z 0 27.5 STONE CURB
N
Z� �o mmzCA
r'
c = ROOF PORCH
�co �> mrr rnOl v
rn -0 �Dm
tV •g� 11 F 11
�o <o 62m L 26.3 z N ---I
-o=� Ej-4o .a 'o� p o
c = z m N
m NO
r•O� -r zDD j pQ° r- _ a
,z_
�vO
z
Om - c rl O$
mom
m m . Oz 11 O D z T p o m z -y r- n -' _ V)M z o coec_ o p m� z o=om o p W
^ al
$D mo 0
ZNDQ L-129 � O
� - C° C ---�OcrP o c o CA Zy r
r ° °z o ' Q m Ol;�' z
-OP
Cn v a c: N < rn O rn o � N
D C /� c o� O m �z C I
® I co � < O z o=m o m �rri "TI (n v
0o N -P Z-� rn ��N m r z
r
w w m �o z o o z< m .26.2'. �i�'9� c m =
n o z m A a� 0 a) C M O
O Cn Z Z En f ri x j cn n o cn J x 'T1
m
rri
o o=-o 0 m � z
0 �' vzi m o r0 Z
z D En� x �j
w � � �� � O
N —
tD z
O O - D
in
0 X Cfl 0
o� Z
m D <z = =rn ;3v�Di
m -D
O %� � �D PVC FENCE
-I
�r / 3z�� x n n n om r O
� � 0 ��O� Oc g � � m m rn �
- - _ o o I N 5?°�5 QQ E 1�8.g7 Coo o z
DOm D cQZ rn prn .{ m Cn O
/l n D
p F NO En
;o 5 r
40
M --� ,ti _ co o n <
z r- m
M ;' O v o D r
v
m �
�.� 0 ��. m
o
Ul
M o
Oo N
X �
mow
UUL
zp