HomeMy WebLinkAbout2001-12-19 - Board of Trustees Meeting Minutes APPROVED MINUTES
Board of Trustees Regular Meeting
December 19, 2001
VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK
BOARD OF TRUSTEES MEETING
VILLAGE HALL, 938 KING STREET
WEDNESDAY,DECEMBER 19, 2001
AGENDA
PRESENTATION:
1. Sullivan Architecture- Presentation of Fire Program Study.
RESOLUTIONS:
1. Considering a Local Law to Amend Section 250-39 of the Wireless
Telecommunication Facilities Law.
2. 211 South Ridge Street Nextel Wireless Telecommimications Facility Special Use
Permit and Site Plan Approval Section 1, Block 24, Lot 1.
3. Merger of Two (2) Substandard Lots 9 Woodland Drive,Rye Brook, New York Tax
Map Section 1, Block 9, Lots 2C, 2D and 3A.
4. Directing Village Planning Consultant to Propose Amendments to Village of Rye
Brook Zoning Ordinance.
5. Setting Date for a Public Hearing on Amending the Fire Protection Agreement with
the Village of Port Chester.
6. Urging the County of Westchester to Resurface Ridge Street(County Road No. 54B).
7. Appointing Registrar of Vital Statistics.
8. Appointment of Assistant Building Inspector.
9. Schedule of Bills Payable.
10. Amendment to the Rules of Procedure.
11. Approval of Minutes-November 27, 2001.
1
APPROVED MINUTES
Board of Trustees Regular Meeting
December 19, 2001.
l
PRESENT:
FRANCIS L. FILIPOWSKI, Mayor
JODY H. BRACKMAN
DONALD DEGLING
DEAN SANTON
LAWRENCE A. RAND
Trustees
ABSENT:
None
STAFF: Edward F. Beane—Village Attorney
Christopher J. Bradbury—Village Administrator
Ingrid Richards—Assistant to the Administrator
Chief Robert Santoro—Police Chief
Victor G. Carosi, Village Engineer
William Gerety—Building Inspector
David Kvinge,-Frederick P. Clark (Village Consultant)
Michael S. Begin—Special Legal Counsel
Gina Tarascio—Meeting Secretary
1. Pledge of Allegiance
Mayor Filipowski called the meeting to order and invited the Board to join in the Pledge
of Allegiance.
2. Roll Call
Mayor Filipowski asked the Assistant to the Administrator to call the roll; a quormn was
present to conduct official Village business.
Mayor Filipowski opened the meeting and publicly thanked Trustee Rand for producing a
result for the Village by making contact with Con Edison which resulted in getting the lights
honed on the bridge and the traffic lights on Ridge and High Street.
At this time Mayor Filipowski anointed that Kip Konigsberg has resigned from the
Advisory Council on Parks and Recreation, and an opening is available. Since he has the
ability to appoint with Board approval,please advise if there is interest.
2
APPROVED MINUTES
Board of Trustees Regular Meeting
December 19, 2001.
3. Considering A Local Law To Amend Section 250-39 The Wireless Telecommunications
Facilities Law
Mayor Filipowski declared the public hearing open regarding the local law to
amend Section 250.39 of the Wireless Telecommunication Facilities Law. Mayor
Filipowski noted that since there was no response from our Planning Board about this
issue, this topic would need to be adjourned.
Mr. Bradbury advised the Board and public that the Village received a response
from the Telecommunications Commission recommending the Village accept the
amendment to the section of our code and that the Planning Board will discuss this item
at its next meeting. Mr. Bradbury recommended that we adjourn this item and put it on
the agenda for the January 22A meeting, which falls after the next Planning Board
meeting.
Trustee Rand stated that in dealing with telecommunications on both a federal and
state level we have learned that local municipalities are restricted about what they can
and cannot do. In working with our outside counsel we will probably see our Board along
with other Boards continue to evolve with wireless telecommunications facilities law
which will enable more flexibility to protect the Village of Rye Brook.
At this time, Mayor Filipowski asked if any member of the public wished to
address the Board.
Mrs. Dee Dee Mitchell, Ivy Hill Lane of the Arbors addressed the Board. She
noted that her main concern was how does the change in the amendment affect the
nniber of towers that will be put on top of the office buildings in our community and
how does the amendment affect what we have to live with?
Mr. Michael Bogin, Special Telecommunications Counsel for Village of Rye
Brook, stated that this particular amendinent would permit the Village to require
applicants to explain why they selected the site, why other sites were not appropriate and
why other sites were rejected and that these applicants roust take into account visual
impacts. He also noted that this Board has the authority based on visual impact alone if
they are significant, to reject their application or give a positive declaration to an
application and require a full fledged state environmental quality review act analysis. He
also stated that the Village would continue to strengthen the statute and continue to
require applicants to demonstrate on a case-by-case basis why a particular site is an
appropriate site.
Mayor Filipowski motioned to adjourn the item to the January 22, 2002.
3
APPROVED MINUTES
Board of Trustees Regular Meeting
December 19, 2001.
Mayor Filipowski Voting Aye
Trustee Brackman Voting Aye
Trustee Degling Voting Aye
Trustee Rand Voting Aye
Trustee Santon Voting Aye
This resolution will be adjourned and discussed on January 22, 2002 after the Planning
Board has reviewed this item.
4. 211 South Ridge Street, Nextel Wireless Telecommunications Facility, Special Use
Permit And Site Plan Approval Section 1, Block 24, Lot 1
Mayor Filipowski declared the public hearing open regarding the Nextel wireless
telecommunications facility special use permit and site plan approval to construct a
wireless telecommunications facility at 211 South Ridge Street.
Ms. Cara Bonomolo, Nextel attorney of Snyder & Snyder in White Plains
addressed the Board. Ms. Bonomolo stated that Nextel is proposing to co-locate a
wireless telecommunications facility on the existing building of 211 S. Ridge Street. This
facility will consist of the installation of 12 small panel antennas, mounted in three-
antenna arrays. A 189 square foot equipment room and mounting structure will be located
in the underground parking garage of the office. She stated that when she was here last
month this public hearing was adjourned to give the Telecommunications Commission an
opportunity to review the application. They did receive a report dated from the committee
dated December 13`x'in which the Commission recommended approval of this application
and have submitted all the required information.
Trustee Santon raised a question regarding parking and how does the impact on
garage parking space impact site plan parking.
Ms. Cara Bonomolo addressed the Board and stated that her firm has examined
this further and determined the equipment room will not impact the existing space. The
equipment room would actually cause an existing parking space to become a compact car
space in the parking garage. Therefore, there will be no change in parking spaces.
Trustee Santon raised a question regarding the proposed amendment and what
does the special counsel think of alternate site selection. In addition, does the advocate
have to demonstrate that there will be an increase in service coverage or are they allowed
to unload some customer capacity.
Ms. Cara Bonomolo addressed the Board and stated that although the wireless
telecommunication facility will increase coverage in Rye Brook, there will still be a gap
in the center of the Village. She stated to the Board that the engineer, Akira Yamasaki of
4
APPROVED MINUTES
Board of Trustees Regular Meeting
December 19, 2001.
Lawler, Matusky & Skelly stated that the only way to fill this gap is to build a tower in a
residential neighborhood. Nextel is not looking to do this. In addition it will also unload
some of the capacity currently at the United Hospital site.
Trustee Rand stated that after reading the report and application, he must
compliment Nextel on its thorough and complete application and noted that it has
provided an alternate site analysis.
Trustee Brackman made a motion, seconded by Trustee Degling to adopt the
following resolution:
WHEREAS, Nextel has made an application to the Village of Rye Brook
requesting a Special Use Permit and Site Plan Approval for the installation of an attached
wireless telecommunications facility consisting of twelve panel antennas in three sectors
to be mounted on the roof of the existing building and with equipment cabinetry to be
located in the underground parking area of the existing building located at 211 South
Ridge Street, within the C1 Neighborhood Retail Zoning District, Tax Map Parcel No. 1-
24-1; and
WHEREAS, the Village Board of Trustees has reviewed and accepted as
adequate the information submitted by the applicant in support of the application,
including a Full Environmental Assessment Form (Parts I and Il), a narrative description
of the proposed action and nature of the proposed use, and the following plans and
reports:
1. Application package titled"Statement in Support of Application by Nextel of New
York," including affidavits, supporting materials and studies, and a Visual
Resource Evaluation;
2. Sheet Y-1, "Title Sheet,"dated 6/15/01,prepared by Tectonic Engineering, Cornwall,
New York;
3. Sheet C-1, "Plot Plan," dated 6/15/01,prepared by Tectonic Engineering, Cornwall,
New York;
4. Sheet C-2, "Site Plan and Setback Map," dated 6/15/01,prepared by Tectonic
Engineering, Cornwall, New York;
5. Sheet A-1, "Roof Plan, Details, and Notes," dated 6/15/01, prepared by Tectonic
Engineering, Cornwall, New York;
6. RF Engineering Report Addendum dated October 31, 2001 prepared by Nextel
Engineering Department with a November 1, 2001 cover letter from Snyder and
Snyder, the applicant's attorney; and
5
APPROVED MINUTES
Board of Trustees Regular Meeting
December 19, 2001.
WHEREAS, the Village Board of Trustees referred the application to the Village
Planning Board on August 21, 2001, and the Village Planning Board, by resolution dated
November 8, 2001, recommended granting the Special Use Permit and Site Plan
Approval, subject to certain conditions; and
WHEREAS, the Village Advisory Council on Environmental Conservation
reviewed the application and submitted a report dated November 21, 2001; and
WHEREAS, the proposed antennas will emit non-ionizing electromagnetic
radiation (NIER) (radio waves) for which maximum permissible exposure (MPE) criteria
are published, and the applicant provided maps of the NIER field strengths of the
proposed facility following accepted models for the calculations; and
WHEREAS, the Village has retained the services of Lawler, Matusky, & Skelly
Engineers to review the Structural Analysis report prepared by the applicant and a
general review of the application; and
WHEREAS, Lawler, Matusky, & Skelly Engineers reviewed the application
prepared by the Applicant and submitted reports dated August 21 and November 1, 2001;
and
WHEREAS, the top of the proposed antemias will be approximately 6.5 feet
above the existing major portion of the parapet and approximately 10 feet above the roof
line, and the equipment cabinets will be located within the existing parking area below
grade; and
WHEREAS, the Applicant, in response to a request from the Planning Board,
constructed a mock-up of the proposed antennas at the site, which mock-up was in-place
and available for viewing from 12:00 noon on Friday,November 2 to 5:00 PM on
Sunday, November 4; and
WHEREAS, the Applicant has met all of the requirements concerning co-
location, including the required affidavits, of Section 250-39 of the Village of Rye Brook
Zoning Code; and
WHEREAS, the Village Board of Trustees is familiar with the Site and all
aspects of the Project and has been satisfied that the Project will comply with the Special
Permit and Site Development Plan standards and requirements of the Village of Rye
Brook Code, except as otherwise noted; and
WHEREAS, the Village Board of Trustees hereby determines that the proposed
installation of a wireless telecommunications facility, consisting of nine (9)panel
antennas mounted in three (3) antenna arrays with associated equipment cabinetry and
6
APPROVED MINUTES
Board of Trustees Regular Meeting
December 19, 2001.
mounting structures, meets the criteria for special permits as stated in Section 250-
6(H)(2) of the Village of Rye Brook Code, as follows:
a) The location and size of the use, the nature and intensity of the operations
involved in or conducted in connection with it and its relation to streets
giving access to it are such that it will not be hazardous, inconvenient or
detrimental to the predominantly residential activities and character of the
neighborhood;
b) The location, nature and height of buildings, walls and fences and the
nature and extent of landscaping on the site are such that the use will not
hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land
and buildings or impair the value thereof; and
C) The proposed use will be provided with off-street parking adequate for its
needs, considering the assemblage of persons and vehicles in connection
with the use, at least meeting the standards of Article IV, Section 250-6G;
and
WHEREAS, the Village Board of Trustees determines that the proposed action is
an unlisted action pursuant to Article 8 of the Enviromnental Conservation Law and 6
NYCRR Part 617 for which the Village of Rye Brook Board of Trustees is the Lead
Agency and the only Involved Agency for the environmental review with respect to the
approval of said Special Use Permit and Site Plan; and
WHEREAS, this is an unlisted action pursuant to Article 8 of the Environmental
Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617 for which the Village of Rye Brook Board of
Trustees is the Lead Agency and the only hivolved Agency for the environmental review
with respect to the approval of said Special Use Permit and Site Plan; and
WHEREAS, a duly advertised public hearing on the application was held on
November 27, 2001 and continued to December 19, 2001 in the Rye Brook Village Hall,
at which time all those wishing to be heard were given the opportunity to be heard, and
the public hearing was closed on December 19, 2001;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED, that the Village of Rye Brook Board of Trustees hereby adopts and
incorporates as findings and determinations the recitations and statements set forth above
as if fully set forth and resolved herein; and be it further
RESOLVED, that the Village of Rye Brook Board of Trustees, in accordance
with Article 8 of the State Environmental Conservation Law and 6 NYCRR Part 617, and
upon review of the EAF and all other application materials that were prepared for this
7
APPROVED MINUTES
Board of Trustees Regular Meeting
December 19, 2001.
action, hereby adopts a Negative Declaration since the Project will result in only minor
physical changes to the site,visual impacts will be minimal, and any disturbance
associated with the Project will be controlled through the proper implementation and
maintenance of erosion and sediment controls; and be it further
RESOLVED, that based upon the site inspection of the mock-up, the Village
Board of Trustees finds that the proposed antennas will not create a significant adverse
visual impact on the surrounding areas or the Village as a whole; and be it further
RESOLVED, that the Village Board of Trustees hereby waives the requirement
for a landscaping plan and determines that the standards for new support structures as
described in Section 250-39 E(5) do not apply in this particular instance; and be it further
RESOLVED, that the Village Board of Trustees hereby grants the requested
Special Use Permit and Site Plan Approval, subject to the following conditions:
1. The Applicant shall submit final structural designs for the antennas and
mounting equipment, to the satisfaction of the Village Engineer and Building
Inspector, in consultation with the Village's RF Consultant.
2. The antennas, mounting poles and hardware, and all other equipment and
hardware associated with the antennas shall be painted light gray or a similar
color to minimize the potential visual impacts to surrounding areas, such color to
be approved by the Village Engineer and Building Inspector prior to installation.
3. The operation of the proposed antennas shall comply with all requirements of
Section 250-39 of the Village's Zoning Code, which regulates wireless
telecommunication facilities, including but not limited to the submission of
annual reports providing an analysis of no ionizing electrical radiation emitted by
the facility.-
4. The Applicant shall submit a bond, in form and of sufficient amount to the
satisfaction of the Village's Counsel, to ensure the safe and timely removal of the
wireless telecommunications facility in case of abandonment in accordance with
Section 250-39 F(11) of the Village Code.
5. The Applicant shall submit an access agreement, to the satisfaction of the
Village's Counsel, to enable the Village to perform testing of the facility or to
remove the facility after abandonment, in accordance with Section 250-39 F(14)
of the Village Code.
6. The proposed equipment room will be designed so as not to result in a decrease in
the number or minimum dimensional standards of required parking spaces, to the
satisfaction of the Village Building Inspector.
8
APPROVED MINUTES
Board of Trustees Regular Meeting
December 19, 2001.
5. Appointment Of Assistant Building Inspector
Mayor Filipowski noted that he would be taking one item out of order. He called
for item number eight, as a courtesy to Michael Izzo who was present at the meeting.
Mr. Bradbury announced to the Board that he is very pleased to recommend and
welcome Michael Izzo to the position of Assistant Building Inspector. He stated that
Michael is very experienced in construction, carpentry, electrical and plumbing and he
most recently was a construction inspector for the New York City Buildings and
Enforcement team.
Mr. Michael Izzo addressed the Board and thanked the Board and Building
Inspector for their recommendations and stated that he is happy to serve Rye Brook.
Mayor Filipowski welcomed Michael to his new role.
Trustee Brackman made a motion, seconded by Trustee Rand, to adopt the
following resolution:
RESOLVED, that Michael J. Izzo, of 150 Maple Avenue, Rye, New York, is
hereby appointed to the position of Assistant Building Inspector with the Village of Rye
Brook, subject to the Civil Service procedures of the State of New York; and be it
FURTHER RESOLVED, that the annual salary for the position is $42,000 with
an effective start date of January 7, 2002, and a probationary period of twenty-six (26)
weeks.
Trustee Brackrnan Voting Aye
Trustee Degling Voting Aye
Trustee Rand Voting Aye
Trustee Santon Voting Aye
Mayor Filipowski Voting Aye
6. Sullivan Architecture- Presentation of Fire Program Study.
Mayor Filipowski called for the first item under presentation.
This presentation was given by John Sullivan, Architect & President of Sullivan
Architecture in Valhalla and Dominick Calgi of Calgi Construction.
Mr. Sullivan addressed the Board stating that he began this project in the sunnner
and met with 10 groups with the Board being one of the groups to review a questionnaire
regarding a potential fire station for the Village and to discuss their expectations,
requirements etc. He thanked the group for participating and is ready to present the
9
APPROVED MINUTES
Board of Trustees Regular Meeting
December 19, 2001.
results of this information. He submitted a conceptual drawing for a $2.8 million, two
story building. His suggestion would be to build a 7,500 square feet firehouse equipped
with offices, dormitories, meeting rooms, training/multipurpose room, lounge, storage for
gear, and four-bay garage, all built on an L-shaped parcel of land. This building will be
able to accommodate 4 vehicles. They were asked to analyze Village Hall site and an
alternative site, located along Ridge Street directly opposite Sleepy Hollow Road. The
Village Hall site could allow for a connection to both buildings to formalize a Village
campus between the two buildings.
The Village Hall site would also require an elevator as well as exit stairs. In
addition, they would keep this building as he illustrated in his sketches residential looking
not the typical institutional type building.
The alternative site, Sleepy Hollow can also accommodate a building of
comparable size and parking. The site can be adjusted so that the building and parking
would be contained all within properties that are not part of the parkway or state park
lands. They have the ability to accommodate a building at this site if the Board wanted to
review this site further. However, in their opinion, the Village Hall property would be the
preferred site.
Trustee Degling had a question regarding the future expansion of the building as
identified on the sketch. Mr. Sullivan stated that this was unfinished space and the
building has the ability to expand if necessary and could accommodate extra offices if
deemed necessary.
Trustee Santon requested that since there are no fire chiefs present tonight, that
we have them present at next meeting for their expertise and point of view and feedback.
Mr. John Sullivan stated that both sites could accommodate volunteer firemen. He
stated that the Sleepy Hollow site is more centrally located, however this site is not
owned by Village and the Ding Street site is owned by the Village. Both sites can be
accommodated. There are pros and cons for both sites.
Trustee Rand urged the Board to move ahead with the engineering studies for
building the firehouse on the Village Hall site located at 940 Ding Street, and to get the
process moving and get the public aware of the situation.
The rest of the Village Board concurred to take the next steps at the 940 King
Street site.
Mr. Bradbury stated that if the Board would like to proceed with the 940 King
Sheet location they immediately in January begin with resolutions for bonding and
SEQR. In addition, we will need proposals from architect and construction management
firms. Mr. Bradbury recommends that the Board create a firehouse committee to work
this process through.
10
APPROVED MINUTES
Board of Trustees Regular Meeting
December 19, 2001.
Trustee Santon noted that there was no engineering components done to date.
Mr. Sullivan stated that he has consulted with Dolph Rotfeld regarding the
engineering process.
Mr. Bradbury stated that Dolph Rotfeld would have an input on this project and
recommends that a construction Manager be hired.
At this time Mayor Filipowski asked if there was any public comment.
Amy Schoen, 73 Country Ridge Drive, Rye Brook resident asked if the Village
needed any special arrangement with the state before going forward with this project and
do we contemplate bringing Connecticut on Board or going forward without discussing
it. She was also concerned about the traffic during school time and rush hour. She stated
that since there were no shoulders currently on the road, serious thought needs to
considered regarding traffic issue.
Trustee Santon stated that before we go forward with a full blown review by the
architect to build on his existing work, we have Dolph Rotfeld arrange for some traffic
analysis and site line analysis which seems to be the most critical area to evaluate.
Trustee Santon also stated that we start working collegially with Greenwich and approach
them in a more upfront fashion.
Mayor Filipowski stated that Greenwich would get its required notification in the
environmental process.
Mr. Bradbury noted that state approval would be needed for curb cuts and a traffic
light. They have had some some preliminary discussion with the state and will have more
once plans are formalized. We will need to review traffic work down the road.
Hillary Silver of Arbor Drive asked the Board if trucks could only turn north on
King Street.
Mayor Filipowski addressed this issue and stated that this was incorrect
information. Tricks can make a left as well as a right hand turn on King Street.
7. Merger Of Two (2) Substandard Lots 9 Woodland Drive, Rye Brook, New York Tax
Map Section 1, Block 9, Lots 2c, 2d And 3a
Trustee Degling raised a question regarding how these two lots are substandard
lots and does it become substandard simply because the proposed building goes over a lot
line.
11
APPROVED MINUTES
Board of Trustees Regular Meeting
December 19, 2001.
Mr. Bradbury clarified that this is a horizontal circle of 125 feet and that is why it
is becomes a substandard lot.
Trustee Santon addressed the Board and stated that going forward, this Board
should consider the pros and cons of an automatic merge process which will eliminate
residents from going through this tedious process.
Trustee Brackman made a motion, seconded by Trustee Rand to adopt the
following resolution:
WHEREAS, Jonathan J. Hochberg and Stacy R. Hochberg are the owners of the
real property located at 9 Woodland Drive, Rye Brook, New York and have made an
application to the Village of Rye Brook requesting waiver of subdivision jurisdiction and
approval of the merger of two (2) substandard lots identified as lots 5 and 6 on the Re-
subdivision Map of Byram Ridge dated October, 1922 and filed in the Westchester
County Clerk's Office as Map No. 2931 and identified on the Village's Tax Map as
Section 1, Block 9 and Lots 2C, 2D and 3A into a single lot pursuant to Section 250-6
(A) (2); and
WHEREAS, the Village Board of Trustees has reviewed and accepted as
adequate the information submitted by the applicant in support of the application,
including a Short Environmental Assessment Form ("EAF") along with a survey
prepared by Edward J. Crothers dated March 30, 1990; and
WHEREAS, the Village Board of Trustees is familiar with the site and all aspects
of the project and has been satisfied that any development on the site will comply with
the standards and requirements of the Village of Rye Brook Code; and
WHEREAS, the Village Board of Trustees determines that the proposed action is
an unlisted action pursuant to Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6
NYCRR Part 617, for which the Village of Rye Brook Board of Trustees is the Lead
Agency and the only involved Agency for the environmental review with respect to the
approval of said merger of the substandard lots; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT,
RESOLVED, that the Village of Rye Brook Board of Trustees hereby adopts and
incorporates as findings and determinations the recitations and statements set forth above
as if fully said forth and resolved herein; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Village of Rye Brook Board of
Trustees in accordance with Article 8 of the State Environmental Conservation Law and
6 NYCRR Part 617, and upon review of the EAF and all other application materials that
were prepared for this action, hereby adopts a negative declaration since the project will
not result in any significant environmental impact since only one (1) building lot will be
12
APPROVED MINUTES
Board of Trustees Regular Meeting
December 19, 2001.
created, visual impacts will be minimal and any disturbances associated with the project
will be controlled through the proper implementation and maintenance of erosion and
sediment control; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Village of Rye Brook Board of
Trustees, pursuant to Section 219-34(A) of the Village's Subdivision Regulations, a
proper case does not exist for requiring additional park lands be suitably located for
playground and other recreational purposes within the Village of Rye Brook and that
neither the dedication of land nor a fee in lieu of land will be required; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Village of Rye Brook Board of
Trustees waives subdivision jurisdiction and that the merger of Section 1, Block 9, Lots
2C, 2D and 3A is hereby approved, subject to the following conditions:
1. The proposed residence shall be designed and located so as to be in keeping
with the general character of the immediate area. A copy of the final plans, as
approved by the Architectural Review Board, shall be submitted to the
Building Inspector for inclusion in the file; and
2. The Applicants shall preserve as many of the mature trees as practical, using
acceptable tree preservation techniques, and shall submit a tree preservation
plan in accordance with Section 235-5(D) of the Rye Brook Code;
3. The Applicants shall prepare a final subdivision plat in accordance with
Section 219-21 of the Village of Rye Brook Subdivision Regulations and shall
submit an application for final plat approval, or a written request for an
extension of preliminary plat approval,within six (6) months of the date of
this Resolution;
4. The Applicants shall pay the preliminary application fee;
5. Endorsement of Waiver by the Mayor;
6. The plat shall be filed at the office of the Westchester County Cleric;
7. The Applicants shall endorse a copy of this Resolution and submit it to the
Village for its files.
Trustee Braclanan Voting Aye
Trustee Degling Voting Aye
Trustee Rand Voting Aye
Trustee Santon Voting Aye
Mayor Filipowski Voting Aye
8. Directing Village Planning Consultant to Propose Amendments to Village of Rye Brook
Zoning Ordinance.
13
APPROVED MINUTES
Board of Trustees Regular Meeting
December 19, 2001.
Trustee Degling stated that the Board consider the conservation easement as a
means of preserving some green space for the benefit of the Village and benefit of
owners. This would be an area in addition to the FAR's that would be of real value to the
Village.
Trustee Brackrnan wanted clarification if drainage also meant homeowner
management and steep slopes or is that a separate issue.
Mr. Bradbury addressed the Board stating that steep slopes are a separate issue.
However, the drainage issue needs to be strengthened and sorted out.
Trustee Santon stated that the Village needs to improve the notification law
regarding these issues and stated that in some Villages, residents are forewarned when
projects come into their neighborhood with a white sign with black lettering which is
posted within a certain distance of the street so all residents are aware of what is going
on.
Trustee Brackman made a motion, seconded by Trustee Degling to adopt the
following resolution:
WHEREAS, the Village of Rye Brook Board of Trustees introduced a local law
which would have imposed a moratorium on the issuance of permits and approvals within
the R-12, R-15 and R-20 zoning districts and the Lincoln Avenue corridor; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees conducted a public hearing and received
comments from residents expressing concern that a freeze on development was too
restrictive and would affect their ability to improve their homes and would discourage
individuals from purchasing homes within the Village; and
WHEREAS, the residents also recognized the need for the Village to review the
Zoning Ordinance to ensure that it adequately preserves the environment and character of
the community.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED, that the Board of Trustees directs the Village's Planning
Consultant to work with staff to prepare a memorandum detailing proposed changes to
the Village Code with respect to certain zoning matters including but not limited to bulls
standard, drainage, conservation easements, steep slopes, and neighbor notification and
that such memorandum be presented to the Board by January 18, 2002; and be it farther
RESOLVED, that it is the intent of the Board of Trustees, upon reviewing the
memorandum of the Village's Planning Consultant, to schedule a joint meeting with the
Village Planning Board to discuss the proposed zoning matters to be studied; and be it
further
14
APPROVED MINUTES
Board of Trustees Regular Meeting
December 19, 2001.
RESOLVED, that it is the intent of the Board of Trustees, upon meeting with the
Planning Board, to direct the Village's Planning Consultant and Attorney to draft
amenchuents to the Village Code for consideration by the Village Board.
Trustee Brackman Voting Aye
Trustee Degling Voting Aye
Trustee Rand Voting Aye
Trustee Santon Voting Aye
Mayor Filipowski Voting Aye
9. Setting Date For A Public Hearing On Amending The Fire Protection Agreement With
The Village Of Port Chester
Mr. Bradbury addressed the Board regarding the recommendation that the Fire
Chief made last summer which was that we presently bring too much equipment to the
scene which could be good and bad. The recommendation by the Fire Chief to the Fire
Advisory Board was that we cut back one engine to the response. The Fire Advisory
Board also agreed to this reduction. Mr. Bradbury noted that the Chief submitted to the
Board how the ladder and rescue engine would be responding to fires in different
situations. Either truck will be available and that we will be working that into the
apparatus response guidelines.
Mr. Bradbury stated that the change in the current plan is to add Engine 14 and
reduce one engine from Port Chester and reduce one ladder during the day from Port
Chester. This issue will be discussed again on January 22 at the public hearing.
Mayor Filipowski made a motion, seconded by Trustee Degling to adopt the
following resolution:
WHEREAS,the Village of Rye Brook entered into a Fire Protection Agreement
with the Village of Port Chester for the period of June 1, 2000 to May 31, 2005
(hereinafter referred to as the "Fire Protection Agreement"); and
WHEREAS, certain Apparatus Response Guidelines are referenced within, and
attached to and made a part of the Fire Protection Agreement; and
WHEREAS, the Village of Rye Brook and the Village of Port Chester want to
amend the Apparatus Response Guidelines.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
15
APPROVED MINUTES
Board of Trustees Regular Meeting
December 19, 2001.
RESOLVED, that the Board of Trustees shall hold a public hearing on January
22, 2002 at 7:30 p.m., at the Village Hall, 938 King Street, Rye Brook, New York to
consider amending the Apparatus Response Guidelines of the Fire Protection Agreement.
Trustee Brackman Voting Aye
Trustee Degling Voting Aye
Trustee Rand Voting Aye
Trustee Santon Voting Aye
Mayor Filipowski Voting Aye
10. Urging the County of Westchester to resurface Ridge Street (County road no. 54b)
Mrs. Mary Bellantoni of North Ridge Street, Rye Brook resident addressed the
Board and questioned what does the term redesign mean?
Mr. Bradbury addressed the public and stated that redesign simply means curb-to-
curb resurfacing only with no major changes to the roadway.
Mr. Ken Heller, Rye Brook resident addressed the Board and urged the Board to
review how flooding has affected the drainage system on Betsy Brown Road. He stated
that it is a major engineering problem. because heavy rains arise onto private properties
due to no curbing. He urged the Board to make a stronger resolution because resurfacing
alone will only raise the road and make the flooding worse.
Mayor Filipowski responded to Mr. Heller and stated that the Board has requested
that the County repave and include drainage improvements and concrete curbing for this
road and he is attempting to get this completed.
Trustee Brackman noted that she received a communication piece from a resident
questioning if the Board can add an amendment to the resolution regarding Anderson Hill
Road as a street that needs repairing.
Mayor Filipowski stated that we need to clarify this situation with the County
Legislator and find out if it is going to be completed.
Mr. Victor Carosi, Village Engineer addressed the Board and stated that the
County had a contract this season, and to date had substantially completed Anderson Hill
Road. He stated that improvements to drainage and the shoulder were made along with
resurfacing the road. He believed that the County had substantially completed this work.
Mr. Bradbury stated that this issue needs further study.
16
APPROVED MINUTES
Board of Trustees Regular Meeting
December 19, 2001.
Trustee Degling made a motion, seconded by Trustee Brackman to adopt the
following resolution:
WHEREAS, Westchester County owns and maintains Ridge Street which is a
major local road located within the Village of Rye Brook; and
WHEREAS, the County has designed and entered into a contract to resurface
approximately 0.7 miles of Ridge Street (County Road No. 54B) from Meadowlark Road
to Ding Street in the Spring of 2002; and
WHEREAS, the remaining sections of Ridge Street are also in need of redesign
and resurfacing.
NOW, THEREFORE,BE IT,
RESOLVED,that the Village of Rye Brook requests that the County of
Westchester proceed with resurfacing the roadway of North Ridge Street (County Road
No. 54B) in the Spring of 2002 and that the County immediately authorize its Department
of Public Works to enter into a separate contract to design and resurface the remaining
sections of Ridge Street; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the County inunediately authorize its
Department of Public Works to discuss with the Village of Rye Brook's Village Engineer
additional work that should be included and performed by the County when it repaves the
roadway, including but not limited to, drainage improvements and concrete curbing as
such improvements will provide for better traffic flow on Ridge Street to the benefit of
residents of Westchester.
Trustee Braclanan Voting Aye
Trustee Degling - Voting Aye
Trustee Rand Voting Aye
Trustee Santon Voting Aye
Mayor Filipowski Voting Aye
11. Appointing Registrar Of Vital Statistics
Trustee Degling inquired if the Assistant Registrar needs to be re-appointed.
Mr. Bradbury will follow-up and confirni.
Trustee Degling made a motion, seconded by Trustee Braclanan to adopt the
following resolution:
17
APPROVED MINUTES
Board of Trustees Regular Meeting
December 19, 2001.
WHEREAS, the recording and filing of birth and death certificates are handled
through the offices of the Town of Rye; and
WHEREAS, Rye Town Cleric Frances C. Nugent has been ably providing these
services as Registrar of Vital Statistics on behalf of the Village of Rye Brook for our
residents.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED, that the Village of Rye Brook Board of Trustees hereby reappoints
Rye Town Cleric Frances C. Nugent as Registrar of Vital Statistics for a two (2) year term
begirming January 1, 2002 and expiring December 31, 2003; and be it
FURTHER RESOLVED, that three certified copies of this resolution are to be
returned to Ms. Nugent for filing along with the copies of the "Notification of
Appointment of Registrar of Vital Statistics" and that the Village Administrator is
authorized to execute any documents necessary to effect this appointment.
Trustee Brackman Voting Aye
Trustee Degling Voting Aye
Trustee Rand Voting Aye
Trustee Santon Voting Aye
Mayor Filipowski Voting Aye
12. Authorization To Approve The Schedule Of Bills Payable
Mayor Filipowski addressed the Board in getting the Ed Beane invoice paid.
Trustee Santon consented to paying but he did reconcile the numbers and can't
see how the invoice match up. He suggested amending this resolution and including the
remaining balance of the Keane &Beane bill.
Trustee Santon also noted that at the next Board meeting, the Village
Administrator provide an update on what the Village has left in the supplemental services
account under Village Attorney. He also noted that under the capital portion, Dolph
Rotfeld's invoices seemed high and would like to know how they relate to the overall
project.
Victor Carosi, Village Engineer addressed the Board and stated that the Dolph
Rotfeld invoices before them represents costs incurred for inspection services for both the
King Street and Valley Terrace projects. Dolph Rotfeld provided the Village with
inspectors to be on-site to monitor the construction of both projects. For King Street, he
stated the state Department of Transportation (DOT) required an inspector to be on-site
that was certified and met DOT requirements and Mr. Rotfeld provided that service to the
Village.
18
APPROVED MINUTES
Board of Trustees Regular Meeting
December 19, 2001.
Trustee Santon questioned some of the invoices regarding the environment and
inquired if the Village always had enough finds in its reserves for these types of bills.
Mr. Bradbury stated that the Village requests supplemental funds when funds are
diminishing.
Trustee Santon stated that he would like an update and status on all developer
related projects.
On a motion made by Trustee Brackman, and seconded by Trustee Rand to adopt
the following resolution:
WHEREAS, the enclosed Schedule of Bills Payable representing payment for services
rendered, have been submitted to the Treasurer's Office for payment and review, and
have been certified by the Village Administrator, and
WHEREAS, the enclosed Schedule of Bills Payable is amended to include payment of
$20, 491 to Keane and Beane representing outstanding payment omitted from the
December 11, 2001 meeting of the Board of Trustees.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED,that this Board hereby approves payment of the enclosed claims and
authorizes payment thereof; and
Trustee Brackman Voting Aye
Trustee Degling Voting Aye
Trustee Rand Voting Aye
Trustee Santon Voting Aye
Mayor Filipowski Voting Aye
13. Amendment Of Rules Of Procedure Of The Board Of Trustees
Mr. Ed Beane, Village attorney reviewed the amendments and rules of procedure
and how they pertain to the Board. He addressed these areas of change and explained that
he distributed a redline version to the Board where the language has changed.
Mr. Ed Beane stated that the amendment is to clarify that items that first come on
for discussion at an agenda meeting. He stated items are not voted on the agenda of the
regular meeting unless there is nmanimous Board consent.
19
APPROVED MINUTES
Board of Trustees Regular Meeting
December 19, 2001.
Trustee Santon addressed various issues regarding these amendments. He stated
that he had some concerns regarding the rules and regulations especially with the Village
stationery regulation. He stated they seem overly restrictive with certain events.
Trustee Rand stated that he agrees with Trustee Santon regarding that these rules
are restrictive and that he is voting against this. He stated that changing rules does not
change behavior, specifically, you cannot legislative civility.
Trustee Brackman noted that she believes there have been enough circumstances
that have created an apparent need to warrant these proposed rules and procedures. She
stated that there were various letters written on behalf of the Board that were not
sanctioned by the Board and were an embarrassment.
Mr. Gary Zuckerman, Hillandale Road, Rye Brook resident addressed the Board
and stated that the Board members are going about it the wrong way in trying to conduct
their meetings. He stated that trying to attempt to eliminate an item on the agenda is not
an appropriate method and that the residents would not appreciate this method. He agrees
with Trustee Rand's comments and suggested allowing the trustees to have their own
personal letterhead to eliminate any confusion or beliefs.
Mr. Dick Hubert, 53 Doral Green Drive, Rye Brook addressed the Board and
stated that this is a freedom of speech issue and asked if there was any legislative body
that has a rule like this.
Mr. Ed Beane, Village Attorney addressed the public and stated that there are a
number of local and Village Boards that have these precise kind of regulations and rules.
Mr. Ken Heller, Rye Brook resident addressed the Board and stated that the
problem lies in never deciphering what is an agenda meeting versus a regular meeting
and that the Board needs to determine this.
Ed Beane, Village Attorney stated he would take comments under advisement.
Trustee Santon stated that the rules regarding adding agenda items does not need
to be amended and motions to table. He stated that agenda meetings are sandwiched in
with a special meeting beforehand and by the time the Board gets to the agenda section
everyone is bored and weary. He also noted that the Village Administrator would have to
be a traffic cop for all inquiries and that the nature of this policy will be cumbersome and
add to his workload. He stated that one person can't possibly act as a buffer for the entire
Village and believes it will be problematic and burdensome for the office.
Mr. Bradbury stated that he prefers to be the point person for such inquires.
20
APPROVED MINUTES
Board of Trustees Regular Meeting
December 19, 2001.
Mr. Ed Beane, Village Attorney stated he would rewrite an amendment regarding
the communication piece. He stated that the amendment that the no official use of official
stationery does not apply to "fluff' issues, only policy issues.
RESOLVED, that to clarify and supplement the Rules of Procedure of the Board
of Trustees of the Village of Rye Brook, the Board of Trustees of the Village of Rye
Brook hereby amends the Village of Rye Brook Board of Trustees Rules of Procedure,
which were adopted and promulgated on October 9, 2001, as follows:
VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK .
BOARD OF TRUSTEES
RULES OF PROCEDURE
1. MEETINGS. Regular meetings of the Board of Trustees of the Village of Rye Brook
(hereinafter referred to as the "Village Board") shall be held on the fourth (0)
Tuesday of each month, except that if the fourth(4"') Tuesday is a holiday, the
meeting shall be held on the next day. Regular and agenda meetings shall be called to
order at 7:30 p.m. Agenda meetings of the Village Board shall be held on the second
(2A) Tuesday of every month, except if said second (2"a) Tuesday is a holiday, the
meeting shall be held on the next day.
2. SPECIAL MEETINGS. Special meetings may be called by the Mayor and shall be
called by him at the request of any two Trustees by their giving the Mayor written
notice thereof, which written notice shall contain a statement of the purpose for which
the special meeting shall be called, and shall also state the date, time and place for the
holding of such meeting.
3. NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETINGS. The Mayor shall cause written notice of a
special meeting to be left at the residence or place of business of each member of the
Village Board at least six hours before the time for which such special meeting is
called. Such notice shall state the object for which such special meeting is called and
shall also state the time and the place of the holding of such meeting. In lieu of the
aforesaid method of service of notice of a special meeting, the Mayor may cause
written notice of such special meeting to be sent to each member of the Village Board
by special delivery mail, directed to the residence or place of business of the member,
at least twenty-four hours before the time for which the meeting is called. Notice
requirements may be waived by the written acknowledgment of a Trustee that he had
actual notice of the Special Meeting.
21
APPROVED MINUTES
Board of Trustees Regular Meeting
December 19, 2001.
4. TRANSACTION OF BUSINESS AT SPECIAL MEETINGS. At special meetings
the business to be transacted thereat shall be only that stated in the notice of such
meeting, except that any other business may be transacted at such special meeting by
the unanimous consent of all the members of the Village Board.
5. AGENDA MEETING: The purpose of an agenda meeting is to determine the items
to be considered by the Village Board at that month's regular meeting and thereby to
establish what matters will be listed by the Clerk in the agenda for that month's
regular meeting. Items may be added to an agenda for an agenda meeting by any
board member delivering a written communication to the Clerk, not later than
seventy-two (72) business hours prior to the meeting.
6. AGENDA: The Clerk shall prepare an agenda for each meeting of the Village Board,
which shall list the matters to be considered by the Village Board at such meeting,
and which shall include a reference to all communications and other matters in
writing, which have been received by the Cleric, not later than noon of the sixth day
preceding the date of the meeting. The matters to be listed in the agenda of a regular
meeting shall be determined at a preceding agenda meeting. An agenda for a regular
meeting shall list the matters to be considered by the Village Board insofar as is
possible in the order set forth in paragraph 7 of these Rules.
The Cleric shall arrange for the delivery of a copy of the agenda of each meeting of
the Village Board to each member of the Village Board not later than the morning of
the third day preceding the date of the meeting. At any time, after 9 a.m. of the
second day preceding the date of each board meeting, the Village Cleric shall during
regular office hours furnish to any person appearing personally at the office of the
Village Clerk, a copy of the agenda and a copy of any communication or any other
written document which accompanies or is part of any item appearing on the agenda
of a meeting of the Village Board. The person appearing and malting such request
shall pay to the Clerk the sum of 25¢ for each page or part thereof requested by said
person. The Clerk shall not be required to reproduce any documents or pages, which
are not readily reproduced by the average copying machine.
Items not listed on the agenda of a regular meeting may be considered by the Village
Board as new matters only upon the unanimous consent of all members of the Village
Board present at the regular meeting.
7. ORDER OF BUSINESS. The order of business at regular meetings of the Village
Board shall be as follows:
1. Roll Call.
la. Flag Salute.
2. Public Hearings concerning Local Laws.
Introduction of the proposed law.
Statement by mayor and report of cormnittees.
22
APPROVED MINUTES
Board of Trustees Regular Meeting
December 19, 2001.
Discussion and action on proposed law.
3. Public Hearings concerning other matters.
Introduction of proposed resolution or ordinance.
Statement by Mayor and report of committees.
Discussion and action on proposals.
4. Resolutions.
5. Administrator's Report
6. Old Business.
7. New Business.
8. Action on non-agenda matters, subject to the unanimous consent of
the Trustees present at the meeting.
8. SUSPENSION OF REGULAR ORDER OF BUSINESS. The regular order of
business at a stated meeting may at any time be suspended by the affirmative vote of
two-thirds of the members of the Village Board present at such meeting.
9. ORDER OF BUSINESS AT SPECIAL MEETINGS. The order of business at special
meetings of the Village Board shall be as follows:
1. Roll call.
Ia. Salute to the Flag.
2. Consideration of business specified in the notice of the special meeting.
3. Consideration of other business, if unanimous consent given by all
members of the Village Board.
10. ORDER OF BUSINESS AT AGENDA MEETINGS. The order of business at
agenda meetings of the Village Board shall be as follows:
1. Roll call.
1 a. ' Salute to the Flag.
2. Discussion of agenda items suggested by members of the Village
Board.
3. Discussion of agenda items suggested by members of the public.
At an agenda meeting, agenda items shall be voted on by voice vote.
11. EVERY MEMBER PRESENT TO VOTE. Every member of the Village Board
present at any meeting thereof, when a vote is taken, shall vote for or against, unless
excused from voting by the Village Board. In the event of a roll call vote, silence
when a Trustee's name is called shall be deemed an affirmative vote by the Trustee.
Roll call vote shall be called in alphabetical order of the last name of the Trustee.
The Mayor shall be the last one to cast a vote.
12. WITHDRAWAL OF MEMBER FROM MEETING. No member shall withdraw
from a meeting of the Village Board without the permission of the Mayor.
23
APPROVED MINUTES
Board of Trustees Regular Meeting
December 19, 2001.
13. ROBERT'S RULES OF ORDER REVISED FOR DELIBERATIVE ASSEMBLIES
TO BE USED. All questions of order or procedure of the Village Board not herein
provided for shall be decided in accordance with Robert's Rules of Order Revised for
Deliberative Assemblies.
14. LOCAL LAWS. In introducing, presenting and transmitting local laws, the following
procedure shall be followed:
a) Every local law shall be introduced by a member or on the report of a committee
b) If a local law purports to change or supersede any provision of an act of the
legislature or to amend an existing local law, it shall show all the new matter
underscored and all the matter to be eliminated in brackets and when such local
law is printed or reprinted all new matter must appear in italics and all matter to
be eliminated, in brackets.
c) Every local law introduced shall be deposited with the Village Clerk and shall be
read in its order of introduction when the order of business "Introduction of local
laws" shall be reached.
d) The Cleric shall cause every local law immediately upon its introduction to be
copied (or printed) and placed on the desks of the members; he (she) shall
number them consecutively as received. Such number shall be retained as an
introductory number. Each local law shall also have a print (or draft) number,
and if the same is printed (or redrafted), the original print (or draft) number shall
be retained and there shall be added its new print (or draft)number.
15. COMMENTS BY MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC. The Mayor shall entertain
comments as to the merits of any item on the agenda, from members of the public,
such comments to be limited to statements not to exceed three minutes in length. Any
statement not germane to the items on the agenda shall be out of order. The Mayor
shall have the discretion to withhold recognition of members of the public until the
agenda has been completed.
Any member of the public may request additional speaking time by writing to the
Cleric forty-eight (48) hours in advance of the meeting. The granting of such
additional time shall be subject to a voice vote of the Village Board. Members of the
public can make comments at the end of the regular and/or agenda meetings or other
public meetings.
16. COMMUNICATIONS. Members of the Village Board shall communicate with the
officers, the employees, the vendors, and the contractors of the Village of Rye Brook
(the "Village") solely through the Village Administrator. No member of the Village
24
APPROVED MINUTES
Board of Trustees Regular Meeting
December 19, 2001.
Board shall give orders, directions or instructions, either publicly or privately, to any
officer, employee, vendor or contractor of the Village.
All communications, whether written, electronic or verbal, with officers and
employees of the Village and members of the Village Board are to be expressed in a
respectful and courteous manner.
During a meeting of the Village Board, any statements, comments or remarks made
by a member of the Village Board: (1) must be confined to the question before the
Village Board; (2) shall not concern the motives of a member of the Village Board;
(3) shall concern the nature or consequences of a proposed action; and (4) shall not
constitute a personal attack or criticism of any member of the Village Board, any
officer of the Village or any employee of the Village
The members of the Village Board may use official Village of Rye Brook stationery
only to (a) express a policy or position of the Village Board as provided in its duly
adopted resolutions, regulations, ordinances and local laws; (b) carry-out or
communicate actions specifically authorized in duly adopted resolutions, regulations,
ordinances, local laws, directives or other actions of the Village Board, and (c) offer
congratulations, appreciation and other non-substantive communications.
No communications to the Village Board shall be read at a meeting unless so directed
by the Village Board,which direction may be made by voice vote.
The Mayor shall entertain a single motion to file, spread and record separately on the
minutes of the meeting, all communications presented to the Village Board.
17. RECORDING OF PROCEEDINGS OF MEETINGS. No person shall record the
proceedings of the meetings of the Village Board, or any part thereof, by electronic or
any other type of recorder, not with a "steno-type" or similar machine, nor by motion
picture, television or any other type of camera or visual record, nor shall any person
broadcast or transmit the proceedings, or any part thereof, by radio, television or any
other means of broadcasting or transmission, without having previously made
application, in writing, to the Village Board at least ten days in advance of the
meeting for which permission is requested and without having received written
permission therefore. This rule shall not be construed to prohibit the making of notes
by any person or persons at such meetings, whether or not such notes shall constitute
a complete transcript of the proceedings, nor shall this rule apply to the Village Clerk
or to members of the Village Board.
18. EXECUTIVE SESSIONS. Upon a majority vote of its total membership, taken in an
open meeting pursuant to a motion identifying the general area or areas of the subject
or subjects to be considered, the Village Board may conduct an executive session for
the below enumerated purposes only, provided however, that no action by formal vote
shall be taken to appropriate public monies:
25
APPROVED MINUTES
Board of Trustees Regular Meeting
December 19, 2001.
a) matters which will imperil the public safety if disclosed;
b) any matter which may disclose the identity of a law enforcement agent or
informer;
c) information relating to current or future investigation or prosecution of a criminal
offense which would imperil effective law enforcement if disclosed;
d) discussions regarding proposed, pending or current litigation;
e) collective negotiations pursuant to article fourteen of the civil service law;
fl the medical, financial, credit or employment history of a particular person or
corporation, or matters leading to the appointment, employment, promotion,
demotion, discipline, suspension, dismissal or removal of a particular person or
corporation;
g) the preparation, grading or administration of examinations;
h) the proposed acquisition, sale or lease of real property or the proposed
acquisition of securities, or sale or exchange of securities, hold by such public
body,but only when publicity would substantially affect the value thereof;
i) review or consideration of communications between the Village Board and its
Attorney;
j) deliberation or negotiations with respect to labor agreements or related matters;
k) consideration of matters which would be likely to affect the reputation of any
private person;
1) any other matter which Federal or State law permits to be discussed in executive
session.
Attendance at an executive session shall be permitted to any member of the public
body and any other person authorized by the public body.
Nothing herein contained shall be deemed to preclude the Village Board from
meeting in executive session to consider any other matter, which for reasons of the
public interest requires such executive session.
19. The words he, him or his shall be deemed to refer to singular and plural and to
persons of any gender.
Trustee Brackman Voting Aye
Trustee Degling Voting Aye
Trustee Rand Voting Nay
Trustee Santon Voting Nay
Mayor Filipowski Voting Aye
26
APPROVED MINUTES
Board of Trustees Regular Meeting
December 19, 2001.
14. Approval of Minutes-November 27, 2002
Trustee Brackman Voting Aye
Trustee Degling Voting Aye
Trustee Rand Voting Aye
Trustee Santon Voting Aye
Mayor Filipowski Voting Aye
15. Administrator's Report
Postponed in order to review Old Business items.
16. Old Business
Review of Garden hm Application
David S. Kvinge, Village Consultant stated that the Planning Board requested that
the Board of Trustees look into this further and speak to applicant further regarding
application.
Mayor Filipowski asked how do bring closure to this issue.
Mr. Ed Beane, Village Attorney stated that the Planning Board should take this
position and inform the applicant that he has a timeframe to complete this application. If
information is not complete, abandon this issue. He also noted that this Board could
handle or send it back to the Planning Board which will only prolong the issue.
Steven M. Silverberg of Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edleman&Dicker LLP,
attorney for Doral Green homeowners addressed the Board and stated that the Board of
Trustees needs to take a stand on this instead of sending it back to the Planning Board. He
also noted that the DEIS projections were traffic related and in view of a lack of
cooperation by the-applicant, we are not going forward and obtain a supplemental DEIS
report.
Judge Bruno Gioffre, attorney for the applicant stated to the Board that the
applicant responded and that the response is as complete as possible and that they are
ready for the next step and are prepared for any Board comments.
Mayor Filipowski noted that the Board members need to decide on three items to
bring closure to this issue;
1. have on agenda to respond;
2. come up with an effective amourrt and put on the agenda meeting;
3. or obtain a supplemental DEIS report.
Trustee Santon stated that we do not want to do the applicant's work and we should
not be in the business of doing an applicant's work on this or any other project. He also
asked if we can accept this application in its form or what are the other options.
27
APPROVED MINUTES
Board of Trustees Regular Meeting
December 19, 2001.
Mr. Ed Beane, Village Attorney addressed the Board and stated that the Planning
Board stated it is an incomplete application and that a supplemental DEIS report will only
delay this item. He recommends to the Board that we have the applicant give us the
missing information now to resolve this immediately and complete the DEIS report at the
applicant's expense. He also stated that by sending the DEIS report back will only delay
the resolution further and also recommended this issue go on for the February 8"'Board
meeting to allot enough time for a further review.
Judge Samuel Fredman of 2 Doral Green, addressed the Board and stated that the
Planning Board states that the applicant has not been responsive and suggests resolving
this matter now.
Judge Bruno Gioffre stated to the Board that it should accept the application as
complete.
Steven M. Silverberg suggested a supplemental DEIS report be provided.
David Kvinge, Village Consultant addressed the Board and stated that we need to
take a closer look at the DEIS and have a public hearing on the DEIS.
Trustee Brackman asked what are the parameters of a supplemental DEIS. Does it
address issues or conditions that arose that were new.
Trustee Degling stated to do what the Planning Board has asked us to do. Provide an
estimate of cost and have applicant come up with that fee to complete application.
He recommended no zoning amendments and put an end to it. He also stated that he was
not satisfied with the economic analysis.
Trustee Santon stated that we address zoning issues before we proceed any further
and asked the Village attorney to frame this for the public.
David Kvinge, Village Attorney stated that the applicant would like amendments
to the zoning laws and would not recommend changing these laws.
Trustee Rand stated that the economic analysis is of high concern.
Trustee Santon questioned if we should deal with zoning before economic
feasibility.
Mr. Ed Beane, Village Attorney recommend that by February 26`x' the applicant is
to provide information or provide funds for us to test the information. This is a better way
to proceed, and make a reasonable decision.
Steven M. Silverberg requested what will happen on the 26`' of February.
28
APPROVED MINUTES
Board of Trustees Regular Meeting
December 19, 2001.
Ed Beane stated that on the 26`h the Board would determine the budget to enable
the Village to complete the FEIS and make information available to the applicant. The
Board will arrive at a figure which applicant will pay to complete the FEIS and if money
is not forthcoming to deem application a dead issue.
Mayor Filipowski stated that between now and the 26`"the Village will need to
come up with an amount.
Mayor Filipowski announced the next Trustees meeting will be held on January
8"' and January 22"d. In addition, on February 12`x' there will be a volunteer recognition
function prior to the meeting.
Mr. Haas, Rye Brook resident addressed the Board and stated that a traffic light is
necessary at the King Street and Ridge Street intersection this is a hazard to all citizens
and urged the Board that it review this urgent matter.
Mr. William Summa, 555 Westchester Avenue,Rye Brook resident addressed the
Board regarding his drywell issue and where this water is going to go and would like to
see the report.
Mayor Filipowski stated that he would contact Mr. Summa once a report is
available to review.
On a motion made by Trustee Rand, and seconded by Trustee Brackman and
unanimously carried to adjourn the meeting at 12:20 a.m.
Meeting adjourned 12:20 a.m.
Respectfully submitted,
C-�--
Christophe . Bradbury
Village Clerk
I�
29