HomeMy WebLinkAbout1996-08-27 - Board of Trustees Meeting Minutes 00620
AGENDA
VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK- - BOARD OF TRUSTEES
REGULAR MEETING
AUGUST 27, 1996
7:30 P.M.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
RESOLUTIONS:
1. RESOLUTION SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR A
LOCAL LAW, AS AMENDED, TO LIMIT THE TYPES OF
WASTE COLLECTED BY THE VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK.
2. RESOLUTION SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR A
LOCAL LAW CREATING A FIRE DEPARTMENT IN THE
VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK.
3. RESOLUTION REJECTING THE PROPOSED SUBDIVISION
AND WETLANDS APPLICATION FOR THE NEUMAN
PROPERTY AT 24 HILLANDALE ROAD.
4. RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE SCOPE OF THE DRAFT
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT(DEIS) FOR
K& M REALTY'S BOWMAN AVENUE PROJECT.
5. RESOLUTION APPROVING THE COURT ORDERED
TAX CERTIORARI SETTLEMENT AND STIPULATION
AND AUTHORIZING PAYMENT OF THE TAX REFUND TO
RYE RIDGE CONDOMINIUMS.
6. RESOLUTION APPROVING THE AMENDED REFUND
OF TAXES PER THE SOUND FEDERAL SAVINGS
CERTIORARI JUDGEMENT.
7. CHECK REGISTER.
MINUTES:
8. APRIL 23, 1996 REGULAR MEETING
9. MAY 14, 1996 AGENDA MEETING
10. MAY 28, 1996 REGULAR MEETING
11. JUNE 11, 1996 AGENDA MEETING
NEXT MEETING DATES:
AGENDA MEETING -- TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 10, 1996
REGULAR MEETING-- TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 24, 1996
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK BOARD OF TRUSTEES
VILLAGE OFFICES - - 90 SOUTH RIDGE STREET
RYE BROOK, NEW YORK
AUGUST 27, 1996 7:30 P.M.
CONVENE MEETING:
The Meeting was called to order at 7:30 p.m. by Mayor Cresenzi in the Meeting Room and the roll was
called.
The following members of the Board of Trustees were present:
Mayor Salvatore M. Cresenzi
Trustee Joseph Pellino
Trustee Eugene R. Strum
Trustee Nancy Stein Tunis
Trustee Gary J. Zuckerman
Village staff attending the meeting were:
Village Administrator Christopher J. Russo
Village Attorney Kenneth E. Powell
Assistant to the Administrator Richard C. Slingerland
Village Treasurer Joseph Cortese
Chief of Police Chief Santoro
Christian K. Miller, Planning Consultant, F.P. Clark Associates
Secretary to the Village Board Lisa B. Marinaccio
Fire Chief William Dee McCluskey
Mayor Cresenzi asked that Chris Russo read the Resolution and set up a public hearing date concerning
the local waste law.
RESOLUTIONS:
1. RESOLUTION SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR A LOCAL LAW, AS
AMENDED TO LIMIT THE TYPES OF WASTE COLLECTED BY THE VILLAGE OF
RYE BROOK.
Mr. Russo discussed a couple of clarifications and changes regarding tree and log collection. It was
proposed that Section 1, A, 2nd line, be amended to read, "Any waste material other than garbage, ashes
and rubbish, which cannot be readily deposited in any receptacles, including logs, may be compacted and
or securely bundled or tied." Additionally, a question was raised concerning whether a 75 lb. bundle
weight is too heavy. It was proposed that the weight be decreased to 50 lbs. Another proposed change
was in the last sentence of Paragraph A, to read, "Such packages, logs or bundles should not exceed 3' in
length." Finally, in Section 2B, the following changes were proposed, primarily to add trees into the
considerations covered under the law, "Contractors, gardeners and landscape contractors performing
demolition landscaping gardening, trash or tree removal for compensation... shall be responsible for
removing or arranging for the removal of all garbage, trash, rubbish, trees, garden waste and other waste
produced in connection with their work."
Mr. Patrick McNeill, Highway Foreman, stepped forward and commented on the proposed law.
He stated for the record:
For some time now, because there is no ordinance, we have been overwhelmed by every
0620
August 27, 1996
landscaper, private contractor and tree surgeon who knows there is no law on the books. I am
tying up three workers on wood chipping for two to three days per week. In a department as
small as ours it gets overwhelming. They know about the hardwood too, so they are putting out
between 200 and 600 pounds of weight on each log. The Village recently bid out log chipping in
the amount of approximately ten thousand dollars. Since about 70% of that is for contractors, we
are picking up the tab to clean up after contractors and tree companies that should remove their
own debris.
Mr. McNeill also supported the recommendation to reduce bundle weight to 50 lbs. He stated this law
would help the department a great deal, and recommended including"Sanitation Company" in the law.
On the Motion made by Trustee Zuckerman, seconded by Trustee Strum, the following Resolution was
hereby adopted:
RESOLUTION
SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING DATE
ON A LOCAL LAW AMENDING CHAPTER 135
OF THE CODE OF THE VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK
TO PROVIDE FOR LIMITATIONS ON TYPES OF WASTE
COLLECTED BY THE VILLAGE
RESOLVED,that a public hearing shall be held by the Village of Rye Brook Board of Trustees on Tuesday,
September 24, 1996, at 7:30 p.m. at the Village Offices located at 90 South Ridge Street, Rye Brook, New
York, 10573, to consider a local law entitled, "A LOCAL LAW amending Chapter 135 of the Code of the
Village of Rye Brook to provide for limitations on types of waste collected by the Village."
TRUSTEE STRUM VOTING AYE
TRUSTEE TUNIS VOTING AYE
TRUSTEE ZUCKERMAN VOTING AYE
TRUSTEE PELLINO VOTING AYE
MAYOR CRESENZI - VOTING AYE
A LOCAL LAW amending Chapter 135 of the Code of the
Village of Rye Brook to provide for limitations on types of
waste collected by the Village.
BE IT ENACTED, by the Board of Trustees of the Village of Rye Brook, as follows:
Section 1. Section 135-3 of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook is amended to read as follows:
A. Any waste material other than garbage, ashes and rubbish which cannot be readily
deposited in any receptacles including logs may be compacted and/or securely
bundled, tied or packed so as to be easily handled, but not weighing more than fifty
(50) pounds and not likely to be scattered, and, when packed and secured, may be
placed at the curb on curb pickup days. Such packages, logs or bundles should not
exceed three (3) feet in length.
2
006° 10
August 27, 1996
B. The Department of Public Works and the Village's Sanitation Contractor shall not
pick up flammable or highly combustible matter, such as cleaning establishment wastes
or other industrial wastes found to contain varnish, paint, thinners or other dangerous
materials; sawdust; explosives; ammunition; oil drums, either full or empty; cans or
barrels containing combustible liquids; rubber tires of any size; rubber wastes;
automotive or similar batteries; tar paper roofing, tar cans; dead animals; or any
hazardous waste as defined by Article 27 of the Environmental Conservation Law and
the regulations promulgated thereunder.
Section 2. Section 135-4 of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook is amended to read as follows:
A. No garbage, trash, rubbish or receptacles may be placed at the curb except on curb
pickup day or after 6:00 p.m. on the evening before curb pick up day.
B. Contractors, gardeners and landscape contractors performing demolition, landscaping,
gardening, trash or tree removal for compensation, as the case may be, shall be
responsible for removing, or arranging for the removal of all garbage, trash, rubbish,
trees, garden waste and other waste produced in connection with their work and such
waste shall not be placed at the curb for pick up by the Village.
Section 3. This local law shall take effect immediately upon filing in the office of the Secretary of
State.
2. RESOLUTION SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING DATE FOR A LOCAL LAW
CREATING A FIRE DEPARTMENT IN THE VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK.
On the Motion made by Trustee Pellino, seconded by Trustee Tunis, the following Resolution was hereby
adopted as amended:
RESOLUTION
CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING
RYE BROOK FIRE DEPARTMENT
RESOLVED, that a public hearing shall be held by the Board of Trustees on September 10, 1996 at 7:30
p.m. at Village Offices, 90 South Ridge Street, Rye Brook, New York on a local law amending the Code
of the Village of Rye Brook to add a Chapter 31 to establish the Rye Brook Fire Department and to
amend Village Law § 10-1000 and Village Law § 4-412(3) (9) (a) in their application to the Village of
Rye Brook, in relation to powers and duties and to include a private for-profit corporation as an entity
with which the Village may contract for fire protection and related services. The local law is subject to a
permissive referendum.
TRUSTEE STRUM VOTING AYE
TRUSTEE TUNIS VOTING AYE
TRUSTEE ZUCKERMAN VOTING AYE
TRUSTEE PELLINO VOTING AYE
MAYOR CRESENZI VOTING AYE
3
-0,062.
August 27, 1996
3. RESOLUTION REJECTING THE PROPOSED SUBDIVISION AND WETLANDS
APPLICATION FOR THE NEUMAN PROPERTY AT 24 HILLANDALE ROAD.
Mr. Russo stated that he would summarize the Resolution and read the reasons for denial. The denial
resolution had been prepared to establish the reasons for disapproval based on the Board's discussion
from the previous meeting. Trustee Pellino requested that the second page, last paragraph, last sentence
of the Resolution be amended to show that the Board considered adding after the words"surrounding
neighborhood" the words, "the Village wide symmetry of lot lines in relation to public roads." This
change would be so that the last sentence would read as follows:
The creation of the gerrymandered lots will permit development that is inconsistent with the
character of the surrounding neighborhood, the Village-wide symmetry of lot lines in relation to
public roads and will produce a precedent likely to attract further peculiarly shaped lots, which
will dilute the intent of Zoning and Subdivision requirements in other applications.
Trustee Pellino thought that more clearly defines the Village's neighborhood character issue and the
'Board's Village-wide thinking behind denying this subdivision application. Mayor Cresenzi asked if the
Board would now be taking the position that the Village would require that all lot lines have to intersect
each other (and the road)by using the word symmetrical. Trustee Pellino responded that he thought
what we're saying here is that the Board is backing up the intent of the subdivision regulations to have,
generally, village-wide, a symmetry and an order to existing lots and future created lots that are the result
of subdivisions. The Board does not and should not give up its right to approve an application, if it sees
fit, and if the Board feels that a particular application merits it and will not damage the character of the
surrounding neighborhood.
Mayor Cresenzi made comments on the side lot lines and the use of the word "reasonably;" he was in
opposition to the denial of the application. He felt that the word reasonably gave the Board enough
leeway to approve this application. Mayor Cresenzi stated his belief that the Board would have to review
and clarify the issue of flaglots in the Village Code. Trustee Tunis also made comments opposing this
denial.
On the Motion of Trustee-Strum, seconded by Trustee Pellino, the following Resolution was hereby
adopted as amended:
RESOLUTION
NEUMAN SUBDIVISION
SUBDIVISION AND WETLANDS PERMIT APPLICATION
24 HILLANDALE ROAD
(DENIAL)
WHEREAS, on November 10, 1995, Michael Neuman, 3rd Street, Rye, New York 10580, made
an application to subdivide 1.036 acres of land in the Village of Rye Brook at 24 Hillandale Road,
situated in an R-20 zoning district in which a minimum lot size of 20,000 square feet is required; and
WHEREAS, approval is sought to subdivide the 45,133 square feet of property into 2 irregularly
shaped lots having a net lot area of 20,444 square feet (Lot 1) and 23,731 square feet(Lot 2), with the
existing single family residence and garage to occupy proposed Lot 2; and
4
oo(321
August 27, 1996
WHEREAS, the proposal for Lot 1 also includes the construction of a home and related
disturbances within a 100-foot wetlands buffer area which requires the issuance of Wetlands permit
approved by the Board of Trustees; and
WHEREAS, as required by the Village Wetlands Law, the applicant has also made a wetlands
permit application for activities within the 100-foot Wetlands buffer area located on a proposed Lot 1;
and
WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees referred the applications to the Planning Board and the
wetlands application to the Advisory Council on Environmental Conservation for a report and
recommendation; and
WHEREAS, on January 11, 1996 and May 9, 1996, the Rye Brook Planning Board conditionally
recommended approval of the subdivision and wetlands applications; and
WHEREAS, on June 25, 1996 and July 23, 1996 the Board of Trustees conducted a public
hearing on the applications after due notice; and
WHEREAS, the application consists of the following plans:
1. Preliminary Plat, Proposed Subdivision at Hillandale Road, Village of Rye Brook,
Westchester Co., N.Y., dated January 11, 1996 last revised July 22, 1996 (one
sheet), prepared by Ralph George Mastromonaco, P.E., Consulting Engineer;
2. Wetlands Mitigation Plan, Proposed Subdivision at Hillandale Road, Village of
Rye Brook, Westchester Co., N.Y., dated June 11, 1996, last revised July 22,
1996 (one sheet, 2 of 3), prepared by Ralph George Mastromonaco, P.E.,
Consulting Engineer; and
3. Standards/Special Details, Proposed Subdivision at Hillandale Road, Village of
Rye Brook, Westchester Co., N.Y., dated June 11, 1996 (one sheet, 3 of 3),
prepared by Ralph George Mastromonaco, P.E., Consulting Engineer; and
WHEREAS, based upon a review of the environmental assessment form, public comments,
recommendations and considering the nature of the application, which seeks approval to construct a
single family dwelling in a residential area, the proposed action is found to be an unlisted action under the
State Environmental Quality Review Act, which action and its denial will not have a significant adverse
impact on the environment and, therefore, a draft environmental impact statement will not be prepared.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED, that the application of Michael Neuman for plat and wetlands permit approval, as
shown on the plans identified above, is denied for the following reasons:
Reasons for Denial
Though the property at 24 Hillandale Road is located in an R-20 zoning district, where a 20,000
5
006213
Aubust 27, lyyo
square foot net minimum lot size is required, the surrounding neighborhood is characterized by large
homes on deep lots generally with considerably more than the required minimum acreage. On the 45,133
square foot Neuman property, this pattern is continued with the home site located roughly 200 feet from
the road, well to the rear of this deep lot.
To subdivide this property, it is proposed to create two front to back, irregularly shaped lots. The
front lot(Lot 1) requires a wetlands disturbance permit for building and the rear lot (Lot 2) is a flag lot.
Lot 2, which is highly irregular in shape, purports to have 65 feet of road frontage by means of a
triangular shaped "crows foot," which at roadside is 65 feet, but which sharply angles toward the 20 foot
wide "flag pole" of the lot. Lot 1 is also irregular and is severely limited in building locations as it
contains wetlands and a steeply sloped area.
Upon subdivision, proposed Lot 2 would have a net lot area of 23,731 square feet and would
become the site of the existing home. Lot 1 would have a net lot area of 20,444 square feet. On Lot 1,
5,157 square feet of wetland buffer area would be disturbed.
The applications are denied.
Section 219-33(c)(2) of the Village Subdivision Regulations provide that:
Side lot lines shall generally be at right angles to street lines (or radial to
curving street lines) unless the Board of Trustees allows a variation from
this rule to give a better street or lot arrangement.
The lot lines of the proposed lots are highly irregular and the side lot lines are not generally at
right angles to Hillandale Road. There is a sharply angled "crows foot' proposed to be created which
creates lot lines which are not perpendicular to the street, and which are very unusual and at steep angles.
The purpose of the crows foot is to create a 65 foot technical "frontage" for Lot 2 on Hillandale Road.
Creation of the proposed 2 lots depends on contrived lot lines which are gerrymandered for
purported compliance with the minimum dimensional requirements of the Zoning Law. This is done at
the expense of the design criteria and intent of the Subdivision Regulations. The creation of the
gerrymandered lots will permit development that is inconsistent with the character of the surrounding
neighborhood, the Village-wide symmetry of lot lines in relation to public roads and will produce a
precedent likely to attract further peculiarly shaped lots, which will dilute the intent of Zoning and
Subdivision requirements in other applications.
Section 219-33(A) of the Village Subdivision Regulations require lot arrangements to be"in
compliance with the Zoning Law." For lots in an R-20 district, Section 250-19(F)(3) of the Zoning Law
requires that a lot have street frontage of 65 feet. Among other things, the frontage requirement is
intended to provide logical and uniform spacing of lots and buildings along street frontages. The frontage
for Lot 2 is illusory because of the steeply angled crows foot. In practical reality, Lot 2 has 20 feet of
frontage which does not comply with the intent of this requirement of the Zoning Law.
The 16 foot wide sliver of land shown on an old subdivision map submitted by the applicant, is
not a street on which frontage can be established for several reasons. It is not a street, but is a driveway.
6
006214
August 27, 1996
It is designated on the map as a roadway, evidently to show the driveway serving several properties. It is
not an existing state, county or village road, has not been approved by the Board of Trustees and is not
shown as a street on a map filed before October 26, 1953. Therefore, it is not a street under the
definition in Section 219-17 of the Subdivision regulations. Under the definition of Section 250-2 of the
Zoning Law, the 16 foot strip is not a street because it is not permanently open to common and general
use.
The denial of subdivision approval renders the Wetlands permit application moot and, therefore,
the wetlands permit application is denied on that basis.
TRUSTEE STRUM VOTING AYE
TRUSTEE TUNIS VOTING NO
TRUSTEE ZUCKERMAN VOTING AYE
TRUSTEE PELLINO VOTING AYE
MAYOR CRESENZI VOTING NO
4. RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE SCOPE OF THE DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT STATEMENT (:DEIS) FOR K & M REALTY'S BOWMAN AVENUE
PROJECT.
The Mayor asked Attorney Powell about the next steps to be taken after the Board adopts the Scope.
Mr. Powell stated that the Board has to receive the Draft Environmental Impact Statement and make any
changes necessary after the public hearings on it. Mr. Miller clarified that the Final Environmental Impact
Statement is the Lead Agency's document and, "While the applicant may prepare the responses, the
responses are those as if they were from the Lead Agency, which is the Board of Trustees." On the
motion of Trustee Tunis, seconded by Trustee Zuckerman, the following Resolution was hereby adopted:
RESOLUTION
SCOPE OF DEIS
K & M REALTY
BOWMAN AVENUE DEVELOPMENT
RESOLVED,that the accompanying scope is adopted for the Draft Environmental Impact Statement
(DEIS) for the K&M Realty Group site plan and wetlands application for K& M's proposed project at
the Bowman Avenue property.
TRUSTEE STRUM VOTING AYE
TRUSTEE TUNIS VOTING AYE
TRUSTEE ZUCKERMAN VOTING AYE
TRUSTEE PELLINO VOTING AYE
MAYOR CRESENZI VOTING AYE
5. RESOLUTION APPROVING THE COURT ORDERED TAX CERTIORARI
SETTLEMENT AND STIPULATION AND AUTHORIZING PAYMENT OF THE TAX
REFUND TO RYE RIDGE CONDOMINIUMS.
On the Motion made by Trustee Strum, seconded by Trustee Pellino, the following Resolution was
hereby adopted as amended:
7
00621,-)
August 27, 1996
RESOLUTION
TAX CERTIORARI SETTLEMENT AND STIPULATION
RYE RIDGE CONDOMINIUMS
FOR THE YEARS 1993, 1994, 1995 AND 1996
RESOLVED, that the Village of Rye Brook approves the certiorari settlement stipulation which reduces
and corrects assessments as recommended by Special Counsel in a letter dated May 31, 1996, in the case
Rye Ridge Condominiums and the Individual Unit Owners v The Village of Rye Brook, Index No.s
7141/93, 7047/94, 6185/95 and 5838/96 for assessment years 1993, 1994, 1995 and 1996; and be it
FURTHER RESOLVED, that Special Counsel Mark S. Tulis, Esq., in authorized to execute and deliver
all documents necessary or appropriate to accomplish the purposes of this Resolution; and be it
FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Village of Rye Brook authorizes the refund of taxes pursuant to this
settlement, as appropriate to accomplish the purposes of this Resolution.
TRUSTEE STRUM VOTING AYE
TRUSTEE TUNIS VOTING AYE
TRUSTEE ZUCKERMAN VOTING AYE
TRUSTEE PELLINO VOTING AYE
MAYOR CRESENZI VOTING AYE
6. RESOLUTION APPROVING THE AMENDED REFUND OF TAXES PER THE SOUND
FEDERAL SAVINGS CERTIORARI JUDGEMENT.
Discussion ensued that this Resolution was correcting the previously adopted resolution amount. Trustee
Tunis suggested that a letter be sent to Sound Federal requesting it keep the lot clean on Ellendale. On
the Motion of Trustee Strum, seconded by Trustee Zuckerman, the Resolution was hereby adopted:
RESOLUTION
APPROVING THE REFUND OF TAXES
PROVIDED IN THE JUDGEMENT OF HON. LOUIS PALELLA DATED JULY 31, 1996
TO THE SOUND FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION
SECTION 1, BLOCK 24, LOT 1A, LOT 1B AND LOT 22 - - 115 SOUTH RIDGE STREET
RESOLVED, that since the Village of Rye Brook has already authorized settlement of the certiorari suit
with Sound Federal Savings and Loan v. Village of Rye Brook, Index No's 16422/91, 08492/92,
07950/93, 07191/94 and 06016/95, and having received said executed judgement which will reduce and
correct assessments on the tax lots Section 1, Block 24, Lots IA, 1B, 22 as outlined below, the Village
Board hereby authorizes the refund of taxes, as amended:
Section 1, Block 24, Lot IA:
Assessment Assessed Valuation Amount of Amount of
Year Reduced From Reduced To Reduction X Tax rate Refund
1991 $50,000 $15,750 $34,250 $88.22 $ 3,021.54
1992 $50,000 $12,100 $37,900 $89.87 $ 3,406.07
1993 $50,000 $12,400 $37,600 $96.11 $ 3,613.74
1994 $50,000 $12,500 $37,500 $103.424 $ 3,878.40
1995 $40,000 $12,450 $27,550 $113.541 $ 3,128.05
Net Total: $17,047.80
8
0062.E
August 27, 1996
Section 1, Block 24 Lot 1B:
Assessment Assessed Valuation Amount of Amount of
Year Reduced From Reduced To Reduction_X Tax rate Refund
1991 $ 7,100 $ 6,600 $ 500 $88.22 $ 44.11
1992 $ 7,100 $ 6,600 $ 500 $89.87 $ 44.94
1993 $ 7,100 $ 6,600 $ 500 $96.11 $ 48.06
1994 $ 7,100 $ 6,600 $ 500 $103.424 $ 51.71
1995 $ 7,100 $ 6,600 $ 500 $113.541 $ 56.77
Net Total: $ 245.59
Section 1, Block 24, Lot 22:
Assessment Assessed Valuation Amount of Amount of
Year Reduced From Reduced To Reduction X Tax rate Refund
1991 $12,000 $ 7,000 $ 5,000 $88.22 $ 441.10
1992 $12,000 $ 7,000 $ 5,000 $89.87 $ 449.35
1993 $12,000 $ 7,000 $ 5,000 $96.11 $ 480.55
1994 $12,000 $ 7,000 $ 5,000 $103.424 $ 517.12
1995 $12,000 $ 7,000 $ 5,000 $113.541 $ 567.71
Net Total: $ 2,455.83
Gross Refund Total = $ 19,749.22
and be it
FURTHER RESOLVED,that the tax refunds shall be paid as provided to Griffin, Coogan & Veneruso,
P.C., on behalf of Sound Federal Savings.
TRUSTEE STRUM VOTING AYE
TRUSTEE TUNIS VOTING AYE
TRUSTEE ZUCKERMAN VOTING AYE
TRUSTEE PELLINO - VOTING AYE
MAYOR CRESENZI VOTING AYE
7. CHECK REGISTER.
On the motion of Trustee Zuckerman, seconded by Trustee Tunis, the following Resolution was hereby
adopted as amended:
RESOLUTION
CHECK REGISTER
WHEREAS, the following checks, representing payment for services rendered, have been submitted to
the Treasurer's Office for payment and have been certified by the Village Administrator:
On-Line Checks: 14621-14722
Payroll Checks: 20401-20493
Environmental: 127, 129-131
Capital: 2568-2577
Capital Pre-Paid: NONE
9
000 .E
August 27, 1996
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED,that this Board hereby approves payment of the above mentioned claims and authorizes
payment thereof.
TRUSTEE STRUM VOTING AYE
TRUSTEE TUNIS VOTING AYE
TRUSTEE ZUCKERMAN VOTING AYE
TRUSTEE PELLINO VOTING AYE
MAYOR CRESENZI VOTING AYE
MINUTES:
8. April 23, 1996 REGULAR MEETING
9. May 14, 1996 AGENDA MEETING
10. May 28, 1996 REGULAR MEETING
11. June 11, 1996 AGENDA MEETING
On the motion of Trustee Zuckerman, seconded by Trustee Tunis, the minutes were approved:
TRUSTEE STRUM VOTING AYE
TRUSTEE TUNIS VOTING AYE
TRUSTEE ZUCKERMAN VOTING AYE
TRUSTEE PELLINO VOTING AYE
MAYOR CRESENZI VOTING AYE
The next meeting dates were discussed briefly, with a Work Session starting the Agenda Meeting on
Tuesday, September 10, 1996 at 6:30 p.m. and a regular start for the Regular Village Board Meeting
scheduled for Tuesday, September 24, 1996.
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:10 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Christopher J. Russo
Village Administrator/Clerk
10