Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1999-02-23 - Board of Trustees Meeting Minutes AGENDA VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK BOARD OF TRUSTEES MEETING VILLAGE HALL, 938 KING STREET TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 23, 1999—7:30 P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ACTION: PUBLIC HEARING: 1. PROPOSED LOCAL LAW TO CONSIDER A MORATORIUM ON THE PLACEMENT OF WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES. RESOLUTIONS: 2. CONSIDERING AUTHORIZING A PROPOSED AGREEMENT WITH WESTCHESTER COUNTY RE: IMPROVEMENT AND STREAM BANK RESTORATION PROJECT AT RICH MANOR PK. 3. CONSIDERING RETAINING A SURVEYOR TO PERFORM A SURVEY OF SIDEWALKS ALONG RIDGE ST. & GARIBALDI PL. 4. CONSIDERING CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICATION FOR 538 WESTCHESTER AVE. 5. CONSIDERING AUTHORIZING A BUDGET MODIFICATION IN RELATION TO THE DISPOSITION OF SURPLUS POLICE EQUIPMENT. 6. CONSIDERING ESTABLISHING THE OFFICE OF AUDITOR. 7. CONSIDERING AUTHORIZING TILE ISSUANCE OF $86,000 IN SERIAL BONDS TO FINANCE COMPUTERIZATION IN THE BUILDING AND RECREATION DEPARTMENTS. 8. SUPPORTING AN EXTENSION OF THE WESTCHESTER COUNTY LOCAL SALES TAX a.k.a. THE 1991 PROPERTY TAX STABILIZATION AND RELIEF ACT. 9. CHECK REGISTERS. COMMUNICATIONS: 10. FRED SCHMALING: REQUESTING FUNDING & INVITING THE BOARD TO THE ANNUAL MEMORIAL DAY CEREMONIES. -- more -- February 23, 1999 PAGE 2 REPORT: 10 A. FIRE CHIEF GEORGE SZCZERBA. DISCUSSION: 11. DRAFT PROPOSED LOCAL LAW TO REGULATE PLACEMENT OF WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES. 12. RYE BROOK ZONING MAP. 13. RED ROOF FARM--BUILDING PERMITS. ,14. PILOT TEEN PROGRAM -- FEE SCHEDULE. NEXT TRUSTEES MEETINGS MARCH 9, 1999 MARCH 23, 1999 Village Hall is fully accessible to the handicapped. Those who need special arrangements should contact the Village Administrator's Office ONE WEEK IN ADVANCE OF A MEETING at (914) 939-1121. -22- MINUTES OF A MEETING VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK BOARD OF TRUSTEES VILLAGE HALL 938 KING STREET RYE BROOK, NEW YORK FEBRUARY 23, 1999 CONVENE MEETING The Meeting was called to order at 7:30 p.m. by Mayor Filipowski in the Meeting Room and the Pledge of Allegiance followed. The following members of the Board of Trustees were present: Mayor Francis L. Filipowski Trustee Donald E. Degling Trustee Joseph Pellino Trustee Eugene R. Strum Trustee Gary J. Zuckerman Village staff attending the meeting were: Village Administrator, Christopher J. Russo Village Attorney, Kenneth E. Powell Village Engineer, Victor Carosi,P.E. Assistant to the Administrator,Richard C. Slingerland Tom Hroncich, Superintendent, Parks and Recreation Chief George Szezerba, Port Chester Fire Department Christian K. Miller,F. P. Clark Associates, Inc. Robert Santoro,Police Chief Joe Cortese, Treasurer PUBLIC HEARING: 1. PROPOSED LOCAL LAW TO CONSIDER A MORATORIUM ON THE PLACEMENT OF WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES. Ken Powell, Esq., Village of Attorney, noted that several weeks ago the Board held a Public Hearing on the proposed Moratorium Law which was recommended by the Telecommunications Committee. After the Public Hearing the Board asked that while a permanent law regulating wireless facilities was being developed the Moratorium Law be revised in accord with comments made during the Public Hearing. Mr. Powell noted that the law being reviewed tonight did not provide for a Moratorium on the Review or proceedings to review a facility, but only in the final step of approval. Mr. Powell noted that the law had been prepared and revised based on the Scarsdale regulations. He also mentioned that during the time the Moratorium Law had been reviewed, the Board had prepared a resolution, which was on the Board's calendar for this evening. Trustee Degling noted that the Moratorium relates to structures in or within 200 feet of residential zones, and the local law,the permanent law, has that distance reduced to 125 feet. He asked for clarification on the difference and noted that in this sense, the Moratorium is slightly stricter than the permanent law. Mr. Powell responded that the law was drafted based on the Scarsdale model which has height limit of 125 feet. Trustee Degling asked if it would enhance the probability that the Moratorium would be upheld February 23, 1999 when challenged if there wasn't the inconsistency between the moratorium and the regulation law. Trustee Zuckerman felt that the draft law would more likely withstand a challenge. He stated that he was satisfied with the current version. Trustee Joesph Pellino stated that the primary concern was to protect Rye Brook's residents and he felt that 125 feet might not he restrictive enough. Other than this area, he had no problem, and felt that this draft was taking Rye Brook in the right direction. On the motion of Trustee Strum, seconded by Trustee Zuckerman, the Board closed the public hearing. The following is the text of the proposed moratorium law on wireless telecommunications facilities: A LOCAL LAW, to be known as the Interim Development Law of the Village of Rye Brook regarding placement of wireless telecommunication facilities to establish a temporary six (6) month moratorium of approval of applications to establish, place, construct and enlarge such facilities in residentially zoned area or within 200 feet thereof to accommodate the study, preparation, and adoption of any necessary amendments to the Village's zoning and other land use regulations regarding such use. BE IT ENACTED by the Board of Trustees of the Village of Rye Brook as follows: Section 1. Title. This local law shall be referred to as the Interim Development Law of the Village of Rye Brook Regarding Placement of Wireless Telecommunications Facilities. Section 2. Purpose and Intent. The Village of Rye Brook, Westchester County,New York, is concerned about land-use and development trends in the region, the County, and in particular the Village. A relatively new form of telecommunications technology, personal wireless services facilities, in the last few years has become a source of serious concern, both within the Village and elsewhere. The development of this technology has apparently been accelerated by the passage of the Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996. The Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 expressly reserves land- use control authority to state and local government regarding the placement, construction, and modification of personal wireless services facilities, subject to several limitations. The Telecommunications Committee has advised that the Village at present does not have regulations which effectively regulate personal wireless services facilities. Such regulations are necessary to review pending applications or application which may subsequently be made. Therefore, the Village Board has concluded that an emergency stop-gap moratorium is urgently needed so that the Village may have an opportunity to address the land use regulation of this new technology. The purpose of this moratorium is to protect the public interest and welfare and to facilitate the Village's consideration of comprehensive regulations regarding the placement, construction and modification of cellular tower antennae for an interim period which is needed for the study, preparation, -2- February 23, 1999 consideration, public discussion and adoption of possible changes to the Village's land use regulations. It is not the Village's purpose to prohibit wireless communication systems or avoid compliance with Federal Law. The Village Board is aware that cellular and other forms of transmission are considered important modes of communication. A process of accommodating this form of technology within the Village's land-use regulations will be beneficial for both the technology and the Village in the long-term. The moratorium has a limited scope. It applies only to applications to site a facility in a residentially zoned area or within 200 feet thereof. Furthermore, the moratorium will allow applications to be reviewed during the moratorium and will only prohibit approvals of them. While these limitations should alleviate the majority of hardship from the moratorium, nevertheless, in order to further avoid or minimize any inequities or hardships which may derive from the strict application of this law, the Village Board has also provided herein for a review and appeals procedure to enable variances to be granted. Section 3. Scope of Controls. A. During the effective period of this local law, notwithstanding any provision of the State Environmental Quality Review Act or any provision of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook to the contrary: 1. The Village Board shall not grant any approvals which would have as the result the establishment, placement, construction, enlargement or erection of a wireless telecommunications services facility in any residentially zoned areas or within 200 feet thereof. 2. Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, including,but not limited to Village Law §§ 7-725-a, 7-725-b, 7-728, 7-730 and 7-732, the Village Board shall not make any decision or findings, or grant any approval on an application for a subdivision plat, site plan, special permit, wetlands permit or other permit, which would result in the establishment, placement and construction, enlargement or erection of a wireless telecommunications facility in any residentially zoned areas or within 200 feet thereof. 3. Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, including, but not limited to Village Law §§ 7-712, 7-712-a, 7-712-b or 7-712-c, the Zoning Board of Appeals shall not make any decision to grant any variance which would result in the establishment, placement, construction, enlargement or erection of a wireless telecommunications facility in any residentially zoned areas or within 200 feet thereof. 4. The Building Inspector shall not issue any permit, approval or certificate which would result in the establishment, placement, construction, enlargement or erection of wireless telecommunications facility in any residentially zoned areas or within 200 feet thereof. 5. The Village Administrator shall communicate with the pertinent boards and officials of the Village to advise them of this moratorium in any residentially zoned areas or within 200 feet thereof. 6. "Wireless telecommunications facility" shall mean an unstaffed facility for the transmission and/or reception of wireless communication services consisting of an antenna array, -3- February 23, 1999 connection cables, equipment facility, and a support structure or tower to achieve the necessary elevation. B. The scope of controls in paragraph"A" shall not apply to: 1. The review or approval in accordance with law of an application which seeks to establish, place, construct, enlarge or erect a wireless telecommunications facility, which is not to be located in a residentially zoned area or within 200 feet thereof. 2. The review and approval in accordance with law of a wireless telecommunications facility which is to be attached to or included in a pre-existing structure, building or utility pole, provided that the wireless telecommunications facility does not materially extend higher in elevation than the highest point of such structure, building or utility pole. A pre-existing structure, building or utility pole shall include those approved for construction in a building permit, special permit or site plan approval at the time this local law shall become effective. 3. The receipt and review of an application in accordance with law, proposing the establishment, placement, constructing, enlargement or erection of wireless telecommunications facility in a residentially zoned area or within 200 feet thereof. Section 4. Validity. The invalidity of any provision of this local law shall not affect the validity of any other provision of this local law which can be given effect without such invalid provision. Section 5. Hardship Relief. In the event an owner of property or other aggrieved party affected by this local law believe they are suffering an unnecessary hardship by virtue of the carrying out the strict letter of this local law, then the owner of said property. or other aggrieved party may apply to the Village Board in writing for a variation from strict compliance with this local law providing proof of such unnecessary hardship. The Village Board, in its discretion, may also consider whether unnecessary hardship is present and a variance should be granted on its own motion. For the purpose of this local law, unnecessary hardship shall not be the mere delay in waiting for a decision on the application for a variance, special permit, site plan, wetlands permit, subdivision, building permit or other governmental permit or approval during the pendency of this local law. The Village Board, upon receipt of such appeal, shall expedite review thereof and shall render a decision in 35 days. Section 6. Interim Suspension of Other Laws. All ordinances, local laws or provisions of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook and all parts thereof in conflict with the provisions of this local law are hereby suspended to the extent necessary to give this local law full force and effect during the effective period. This local law is intended to invoke the supersession provisions of Section 10 (1) (ii) (e) (3) of the Municipal Home Rule Law and to supersede, during the effective period of this local law, inconsistent provisions of the Village Law including Sections 7-712, 7-712-a, 7-712-b, 7-712-c, 7-725-a, 7-725-b, 7-728, 7-730 and 7-732 thereof, -4- February 23, 1999 to the extent of such inconsistency. Section 7. Effective Date and Term. This local law shall take effect upon filing in the Office of the Secretary of State and shall remain in force and effect for a period of six (6) months from its effective date. * Note: This law was not adopted by the Board. 10A. REPORT FROM FIRE CHIEF GEORGE SZCZERBA. Mayor Filipowski skipped to item#l0A to allow Fire Chief George Szczerba to make his report. Chief Szczerba noted that he did not have a report for January, and as February was not yet over, there was not one for February either. However, at the March meeting he would have a report for both January and February. He noted that to date, the department had been very busy with 268 calls between Rye Brook and Port Chester. Approximately 50% occurred in Rye Brook. As instructed by the Village Administrator, research was done on the Montour Falls versus Westchester County Training Center Academy. The Fire Department's MTO, Firefighter Soldren, inquired and received the following information: Cost Per Firefighter: Westchester Career Chiefs Academy $ 450.00 (Starts April 5, 1999 -- Graduates 6/18/99) Montour Falls Registration Fee $ 100.00/Per Firefighter Meals/Lodging $1719.00 $191.00 times 9 weeks) Total: $1819.00/Per Firefighter Starts April 26, 1999 -- 3 weeks; off Week of May 17"-- after which there is an optional EMT week -- then starts on June 14, 1999 and Graduates on July 2, 1999 Chief Szczerba noted that the Montour Falls training sessions go for three weeks,break for three weeks, go for three weeks, break for three weeks and then have the final three weeks, making the whole training period 15 rather than 9 weeks. He expected the classes might be about the same, and noted that no travel fees are incurred with the Westchester class. The Chief explained some concerns the firefighters had raised about Westchester's training facility, including the lack of a sufficient library and the lack of a "live-burn"facility. He noted that other outside resources are available for information. Chief Szczerba was told by Temporary Administrator, Chief Henry Campbell, that the County will utilize the White Plains Fire Academy Training Center. He noted that one or two classes that have graduated from the County Facility have gone down to the New York City Facility, which is one of the best in the country. Chief Szczerba discussed the advantages to having the Rye Brook Firefighters train at the Westchester County Fire Training Center, including the fact that they would benefit from the knowledge of local fire departments. He promised to provide in writing to the Village Administrator all the information he had discussed. He noted that Chief Campbell had advised him that the County Training Center provides the same level of training as Montour Falls. The Chief stated that he would register the firefighters. -5- February 23, 1999 Chief Szczerba reviewed the fire call statistics for Rye Brook, stating that of the 268 calls to date, a large portion of Rye Brooks were for EMS and public assistance. For instance, on January 2, 1999, in a two hour period 22 calls were received during a storm -- 15 calls were in Rye Brook-- and it took approximately four hours to mitigate all of the calls because of lack of resources. They were mostly pump outs. One of the engines(Engine 64) was used to pump out a cellar where there was over five feet of water. Mr. Russo was contacted and the necessary pumps had been purchased for the Rye Brook firefighters;Port Chester Fire Department would soon have the same equipment. The Chief continued his comments on the requirements for annual testing and status of Ladder 66 and Engine 221, including the possibility of selling Engine 221. The Chief commented that Port Chester is continuing to prepare for the new budget which is in June and a report would be completed by April V. The EMS equipment has been ordered and scheduled for delivery very soon. As soon as it is received it will be placed into service. The media should be notified and a reminder placed on the access channel about the new service availability. There were a few structure fires while the Rye Brook firefighters were on duty, including one at the airport. They responded quickly and put the fire out in each case. Everything was handled professionally, efficiently and courteously. They worked very well with the Port Chester, Armonk and Purchase units that were on the scene. A second fire was in the Arbors, an oil burner malfunction which extended to the wall. Rye Brook was not on duty and Port Chester responded, the fire was quickly put out. Chief Szczerba noted that morale between the departments is an important issue. The firefighters from both Villages have had lunch together for a second time. Some volunteers were also in attendance. Chief Szczerba will furnish breakdowns and numbers in his detailed report, along with a video of a structure fire at 18 Riverdale Avenue. It was videotaped in an amateur video made by a neighbor but he felt that the Board should review it. Trustee Zuckerman requested an overview of how Chief Szczerba saw the future of the Rye Brook Fire Department, especially with the collaboration with the two departments. Chief Szczerba expressed his opinion that both villages should and could work together. He believed that the future of the fire service in Rye Brook lies between the two Villages. Both departments are here to do a good job. Trustee Zuckerman asked,whether the upcoming budget included any plans for additional funding. Chief Szczerba said there were proposed changes, but he stated that he would have to discuss them with the Port Chester Board of Trustees first. Trustee Zuckerman requested a status report for compliance with the recommendations of the MMA Study. Chief Szczerba stated that he would furnish a response after it was released to the Board. Trustee Zuckerman thanked the Chief for his efforts, and Chief Szczerba concluded his comments. RESOLUTIONS: 2. CONSIDERING AUTHORIZING A PROPOSED AGREEMENT WITH WESTCHESTER COUNTY RE: IMPROVEMENT AND STREAM BANK RESTORATION PROJECT AT RICH MANOR PARK. There were some changes made to the contractual agreement based on the comments which had been received. Trustee Zuckerman suggested that the item be tabled awaiting a report from First Environment, based on a discussion with Chris Russo and Rich Slingerland concerning mercury which had been detected in the stream bed. Although the mercury content is below what is deemed dangerous, he felt -6- February 23, 1999 that it was important to continue testing and investigation. Primary among his other concerns was the Village's responsibility under the contract with the County for silt removal. Mr. Russo noted an option of doing composite sampling, which means you take samples from all over the brook. Additional lab tests would be done at a cost of approximately$2,000, to determine how to handle the silt dredged from the stream bed. Mr. Slingerland noted that the county needed to get their workers in by March. Mr. Russo stated that the question was whether or not additional testing should be done. Mr. Slingerland noted that currently the stream is frozen and everything would have to wait until March. Mayor Filipowski noted that the levels of mercury were very low and he did not want to create an impression that there was a hazardous situation here. He commented that the Advisory Council on Environmental Conservation had reviewed and approved the project, but in fairness to them, they did not have the technical expertise to review this report. The Board thought it would be a good idea, even though this is a good project, to invest the next couple of weeks in further investigation and make sure that everyone is comfortable going forward. This item was tabled until March 9, 1999. ,A member of the public asked for the extent of the proposed dredging, and Mr. Russo replied that it would be approximately 100' (30 yards). A history of flooding in this area of the Blind Brook was noted. A suggestion that this project be taken advantage of and more dredging be done was responded to by a comment on the funds. Mr. Russo noted that this is a grant application -- and grant money. It would become an expenditure from the Village accounts. Mr. Dominick Accurso asked for the location of the samples taken. Mr. Slingerland replied that three samples were taken, two from the project location next to the field on Acker Drive, and the third was taken from the confluence of the two brooks --where one stream comes in from Woodland Drive and the other stream connects. He suggested that any further samples be taken from the proposed work area and the area of the stream directly above the work area. Mayor Filipowski noted that there was a motion and a second to table, however, Mr. Peter Bernbaum asked for a few moments of the Board's time. Mr. Bernbaum stated that his comments would be confined to due diligence and not to the aesthetics of the project. He mentioned that he had spent some time with the Village Engineer and, as a result of this conversation, he felt that the test is indicative of a lack of due diligence by the Village. He felt other important topics should be further investigated including the role of the park in flood retention, the possibility that a deer tick problem could exist, and information on public safety incidents. Additionally, he noted that he had comments regarding the aesthetics, which he would leave to the formal hearing. Mr. Bernbaum felt that there were matters of welfare, health and public safety which need to be addressed. He offered his assistance in investigating these matters. Mayor Filipowski thanked Mr. Bernbaum for his comments, and the Board agreed to table the resolution authorizing the grant agreement with Westchester County. 3. CONSIDERING RETAINING A SURVEYOR TO PERFORM A SURVEY OF SIDEWALKS ALONG RIDGE STREET AND GARIBALDI PLACE. Mr. Russo read the resolution, and discussion ensued. Trustee Degling asked whether the grant would cover the cost of the surveying. Mr. Russo responded that it is expected to cover between 50-75% of the -7- February 23, 1999 cost of the project to install new curbs and concrete sidewalks in areas that do not have them now along the Ridge Street corridor from Ridge Boulevard to Garibaldi Place and then to Grant Street. He stated that it would not cover the cost of preparing the application. Trustee Brackman suggested that sidewalks be considered for all of Ridge Street. Mr. Russo responded that only certain areas in certain census tracts could qualify for grant money under the Urban County Grant Program. Mrs. Brackman noted that because of a lack of sidewalks near the elementary school children could not walk to school. She said, "The street is unsafe since there is no division between the street and the sidewalk."Mr. Russo noted that as part of the subdivision approval for Red Roof Farm the developer would be required to replace the sidewalk on Ridge Street. Mr. Russo noted that he had attended a meeting with the New York State DOT, which resulted in two positive things. They agreed that for the length of North Ridge Street, from King Street to their Southbound on-ramp, they would install concrete sidewalks and curbs in addition to re-phasing and improving the area as part of the Hutch project. It is a short distance compared to the whole length of Ridge Boulevard North to King Street, but every little bit helps as concrete sidewalks and curbs are expensive. There was also a verbal commitment.that if the Connecticut approval is not received, and the project has to end, then they would hold to their commitment to make the improvements at the intersection of Glenville Road and King Street. Plus they would realign the Blind Brook High School driveway to improve the traffic conditions. There being no further discussion, the Mayor asked for a vote on the resolution. On the motion of Trustee Pellino, seconded by Trustee Zuckerman, the following resolution was adopted: RESOLUTION RETAINING SURVEYOR RESOLVED, that the Village of Rye Brook is authorized to retain J.W. Delano L.S. to perform surveying services in connection with sidewalk improvements along a portion of Ridge Street from Ridge Boulevard to Garibaldi Place and along Garibaldi Place to West Street for the sum of$134,560; and it is further RESOLVED, that the Mayor is authorized to execute and deliver all documents necessary or appropriate to accomplish the purposes of this Resolution. Trustee Degling Voting Aye Trustee Pellino Voting Aye Trustee Strum Voting Aye Trustee Zuckerman Voting Aye Mayor Filipowski Voting Aye 4. CONSIDERING CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICATION FOR 538 WESTCHESTER AVENUE. On the motion of Trustee Pellino, seconded by Trustee Strum, the following resolution was adopted: -8- February 23, 1999 RESOLUTION CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICATION FOR 538 WESTCHESTER AVENUE RESOLVED, that the Board of Trustees will conduct a public hearing in Village Hall, 938 King Street,Rye Brook,New York on March 9, 1999, at 7:30 p.m. on the application of Caputo and Boncardo requesting Special Permit Approval for the property at 538 Westchester Avenue, Rye Brook, New York. Trustee Degling Voting Aye Trustee Pellino Voting Aye Trustee Strum Voting Aye Trustee Zuckerman Voting Aye Mayor Filipowski Voting Aye 5. CONSIDERING AUTHORIZING A BUDGET MODIFICATION IN RELATION TOT THE DISPOSITION OF SURPLUS POLICE EQUIPMENT. Trustee Strum had a question about the proper accounting procedures. Chief Santoro explained that the purpose of the transfer is to accommodate the requirements of law in the sale of a confiscated vehicle by the police department. $800 was deposited into a revenue line and $800 was moved into the equipment line. According to the State Comptroller's Office, it was necessary to prepare a Budget Modification and increase Appropriations. The Board completed the discussion On the motion of Trustee Zuckerman, seconded by Trustee Degling, the following resolution was adopted: RESOLUTION BUDGET MODIFICATION POLICE DEPARTMENT FROM TO AMOUNT 101.1990.424 101.3120.200 $800 (CONTINGENCY) (POLICE EQUIPMENT) Trustee Degling Voting Aye Trustee Pellino Voting Aye Trustee Strum Voting Aye Trustee Zuckerman Voting Aye Mayor Filipowski Voting Aye G. CONSIDERING ESTABLISHING THE OFFICE OF AUDITOR. Trustee Zuckerman noted that the Board of Trustees would no longer approve check registers, and that the review and approval would be up to the Auditor. He suggested that the Board still be sent copies of -9- February 23, 1999 the check register in order to be kept abreast of financial issues. He questioned whether there would be a job description of the Auditor's function as he felt an Auditor should meet certain qualifications. Mayor Filipowski noted that the check registers should continue to be viewed for information purposes. It was noted that while the position is vacant the check registers would still be approved by the Board. On the motion of Trustee Strum, seconded by Trustee Degling, the following resolution was adopted: RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THE OFFICE OF AUDITOR RESOLVED, that pursuant to Village Law §5-524 (3), the Office of the Auditor is established to audit and order paid all claims against the Village,which order shall be in such form prescribed in the Village Law for similar orders of the Village Clerk, and which Auditor shall transmit such order directly to the Village Treasurer and shall retain a duplicate thereof in the Auditor's Office; and it is further RESOLVED, that the stipend for such position shall be two hundred dollars ($200) per month. Trustee Degling Voting Aye Trustee Pellino Voting Aye Trustee Strum Voting Aye Trustee Zuckerman Voting Aye Mayor Filipowski Voting Aye 7. CONSIDERING AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF$86,000 IN SERIAL BONDS TO FINANCE COMPUTERIZATION IN THE BUILDING AND RECREATION DEPARTMENTS. During the discussion, Christopher Russo, Village Administrator, recommended that the Board change the title of the resolution to add the Public Works Department. It was noted that the Rec-Trac software is in place and up and running in the Recreation Department. Trustee Pellino noted that this item was in last year's budget. On the motion of Trustee Pellino, seconded by Trustee Strum, the following resolution was adopted as amended: RESOLUTION BOND RESOLUTION DATED FEBRUARY 23, 1999 AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF $86,000 SERIAL BONDS OF THE VILLAGE OF RYE BROOI{TO FINANCE PUBLIC WORKS, BUILDING AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT COMPUTERIZATION PURSUANT TO THE LOCAL FINANCE LAW OF NEW YORK BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of Trustees of the Village of Rye Brook,New York as follows: -10- February 23, 1999 Section 1. The Village of Rye Brook shall issue its Serial Bonds in the aggregate principal amount of$86,000 pursuant to the Local Finance Law of New York in order to finance the specific object or purpose hereinafter described. Section 2. The specific object or purpose (hereinafter referred to as "purpose")to be financed by the issuance of such Serial Bonds includes and is limited to the following purpose to be undertaken or completed during or after the year 1999: the acquisition of computer equipment and software for the use of the public works, building and recreation departments. Section 3. The Board of Trustees has determined and hereby states that the estimated maximum cost of such purpose is $86,000 and that it plans to finance such cost by the issuance of Serial Bonds authorized by this resolution, and except as hereinbefore stated, no monies have been authorized to be applied for the financing of such purpose. Section 4. The Board of Trustees hereby determines: (a) That the purpose for which said bonds are to be issued is set forth in subdivision 81 of paragraph(a) of Section 11.00 of said Local Finance Law and that the period of probable usefulness of said purpose is not less than five (5) years; (b) the Serial Bonds hereby authorized shall be paid within five (5)years; and (c)No part of the cost of the purpose authorized by this resolution has been or shall be specifically assessed on property specially benefitted thereby. Section 5. Subject to the terms and contents of this resolution and the Local Finance Law and pursuant to the provisions of Sections 30.00, 50.00 and 56.00 to 60.00 inclusive of said law, the power to authorize bond anticipation notes in anticipation of the issuance of Serial Bonds authorized by this resolution and the renewal of said notes, the power to sell and deliver said Serial Bonds and any bond anticipation notes issued in anticipation of the issuance of said bonds is hereby delegated to the Village Treasurer, the Chief Fiscal Officer of the Village. The Village Treasurer is hereby authorized to sign any Serial Bonds issued pursuant to this resolution and any bond anticipation notes issued in anticipation of the issuance of said Serial Bonds and the Village Clerk is hereby authorized to affix the corporate seal to any of said Serial Bonds or bond anticipation notes and to attest such seal. Such execution/attestation by the Village Treasurer and the Village Clerk may be by a facsimile signature provided that such bonds or bond anticipation notes are authenticated by the manual countersignature of a fiscal agent or a designated official of the Village. The authority to designate such fiscal agent or designated official is hereby delegated to the Village Treasurer. Section 6. When this resolution shall take effect in the manner provided by law, it shall be published in full by the Village Clerk together with a notice in substantially the form prescribed by Section 8 1.00 of said Local Finance Law and such publication shall be in the Journal News and the Westmore News, newspapers having a general circulation in said Village, and published in the County of Westchester and State of New York. The validity of said Serial Bonds or any bond anticipation notes issued in anticipation of the sale of said Serial Bonds may be contested only if such obligations are -11- February 23, 1999 authorized for an object or purpose for which said Village is not authorized to expend money, or the provisions of law which should be complied with at the date of publication of this resolution are not substantially complied with, and an action, suit or proceeding contesting such validity is commenced within twenty(20) days after the date of such publication, or if said obligations are authorized in violation of the provisions of the Constitution of the State of New York. Section 7. This resolution shall take effect immediately. Trustee Degling Voting Aye Trustee Pellino Voting Aye Trustee Strum Voting Aye Trustee Zuckerman Voting Aye Mayor Filipowski Voting Aye 8. SUPPORTING AN EXTENSION OF THE WESTCHESTER COUNTY LOCAL SALES TAX a.k.a. THE 1991 PROPERTY TAX STABILIZATION AND RELIEF ACT. Trustee Strum objected to accepting sales tax revenues and opposed the resolution because it is sales taxes are not subsidized by federal or state government whereas property tax is subsidized. Sales tax, in general, is a regressive form of tax. Lower income individuals are more impacted by this tax and he objected, in principal, to sales taxes raised by a government.which are not voted upon by a government. Trustee Pellino respected Trustee Strum's views regarding sales tax, but felt that the 1991 Property Tax Stabilization and Relief Act was enacted to replace state aid that was eliminated. What has occurred in Rye Brook's case has been the elimination of nearly half a million dollars per year in state aid. This has been replaced by sales tax revenue and it has effectively rescued this Village, and a lot of other Villages and Towns throughout Westchester. Basically, the administration in Albany has abandoned municipalities throughout the state by their actions. He felt that a WHEREAS clause should be added to identify that the revenue was replacing state aid that was reduced by the administration in Albany since 1991. The new WHEREAS paragraph was discussed and added to the Resolution. On the motion of Trustee Zuckerman, seconded by Trustee Degling, the following resolution was adopted as amended: RESOLUTION SUPPORTING AN EXTENSION OF THE WESTCHESTER COUNTY LOCAL SALES TAX a.k.a. THE 1991 PROPERTY TAX STABILIZATION AND RELIEF ACT WHEREAS, the Village of Rye Brook, like other municipalities in Westchester County, faces a restricted revenue base to fund basic municipal services; and WHEREAS, the Village of Rye Brook, like a majority of municipalities in Westchester County and in the surrounding New York Metropolitan Region, has lost a large portion of our assessables—a total of about nearly $17 million-- over the past twelve years due to tax certiorari challenges; and WHEREAS, since approximately 1989 state aid to our Village has been effectively eliminated by the -12- February 23, 1999 state government; and WHEREAS, since real property taxes are the main source of revenue for municipalities, property owners are saddled with a burden for municipal services with few or no alternative revenue sources in sight; and WHEREAS,the County Executive and the County Board of Legislators have advocated and approved the distribution of sales tax revenue to the cities, towns,villages and school districts in Westchester County in accordance with Chapter 272 of the Laws of 1991; and NOW, THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED,that the Village of Rye Brook hereby requests our State representatives Assemblyman Ronald Tocci and Senator Suzi Oppenheimer to support a two-year extension of Article 29, Section 1262-b of the Tax Law, entitled"1991 Property Tax Stabilization and Relief Act,"which currently has a sunset provision of May 31, 2000; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, that by copy of this resolution we join with other municipalities in Westchester County to urge our New York State representatives to support the immediate extension of the 1991 Property Tax Stabilization and Relief Act. Trustee Degling Voting Aye Trustee Pellino Voting Aye Trustee Strum Voting No Trustee Zuckerman Voting Aye Mayor Filipowski Voting Aye 9. CHECK REGISTERS. On the motion of Trustee Pellino, seconded by Trustee Degling, the following resolution was adopted: RESOLUTION CHECK REGISTERS WHEREAS,the following checks, representing payment for services rendered, have been submitted to the Treasurer's Office and Budget Officer for payment: On Line Checks 20277-20365 Payroll 28367-28473 Pre-Paid 20091, 20182, 20193 & 20194 Capital 2835 - 2838 Environmental 181 - 184 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT, RESOLVED, that the Board of Trustees of the Village of Rye Brook, after audit hereby, approves payment of the above-mentioned claims and authorizes payment thereof -13- February 23, 1999 Trustee Degling Voting Aye Trustee Pellino Voting Aye Trustee Strum Voting Aye Trustee Zuckerman Abstained Mayor Filipowski Voting Aye COMMUNICATIONS: 10. FRED SCHMALING: REOUESTING FUNDING AND INVITING THE BOARD TO THE ANNUAL MEMORIAL DAY CEREMONIES. Mr. Russo noted that the request for$750 to be included in the Village of Rye Brook Budget for year 1999/2000 and the invitations have been received from the Veterans' Central Committee. Mayor Filipowski asked if this amount was in the budget, and Mr. Russo responded that it was. Mayor Filipowski noted that the Port Chester/Town of Rye Brook Memorial Day ceremonies will be held at 3:00 p.m. on Monday, May 31', starting at Veteran's Memorial Park at 11:00 a.m. with a parade to follow at noon. The parade route is down Westchester Avenue, ending at the Port Chester Marina. The Board noted that Item l0A on the Agenda had been addressed already, and continued with the agenda. DISCUSSION: 11. DRAFT PROPOSED LOCAL LAW TO REGULATE PLACEMENT OF W112ELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACHdTIES. After a brief discussion of dates, the Board agreed to hold a work session on March 9°i at 6:30 p.m. Mr. Powell noted that the draft that was before the Board this evening is a draft patterned on the Telecommunications Law that was adopted by the Village of Scarsdale, with some modifications for Rye Brook. It provided, essentially, that a special permit would be required for the installation of either a wireless telecommunications facility or an attached wireless telecommunications facility. The special permit authorized by the draft would enable an applicant to request permission to place a facility in the commercial districts of the Village. There would be certain distance and height requirements for the stand-alone facility, with a maximum permitted height of 125'. There would not be distance requirements for attached units since it would basically be attached to existing structures. The Board would be the review authority. The general special permit standard of the Village's zoning laws would apply, as would the airport overlay zone requirements. Any changes in the use would also be subject to approval. Standards for deciding whether to grant a permit would be as follows: • It would have to be necessary and not just convenient; • Operation of security requirements; it would have to be protected against unauthorized access; • The facility would have to comply with FCC requirements; • There would be a preference for co-locating these facilities -- so that their proliferation would be limited; • The applicant would have to pay and provide for other users on the poles. -14- February 23, 1999 The attached facilities can be no more than 15' above the highest point on an attachment structure, while a stand-alone unit would be restricted to 125' in height. There are setback requirements, per the zoning regulations, and other requirements such a landscaping, access, lighting, etc. The application procedure is very elaborate and requires a substantial amount of information from the applicant. There will also be site plan approvals required. Mr. Dominic Accurso of Whippoorwill Road asked whether a facility on the top of United Hospital could essentially serve the community with, perhaps, a second one at the bell tower of Bellefair. The Board continued its discussion, including issues regarding the establishment and monitoring of standards by the FCC. Mr. Slingerland responded that under the Federal Telecommunications Act there is a provision which basically bars municipalities from considering the radiation produced by these facilities, since it is Federally regulated under FCC standards. Mr. Miller stated that potentially you could have them submit an affidavit on a regular basis stating that they do comply. He also suggested that there be a provision to retain someone who knows how to measure these things. A suggestion was made that a call to the FCC could probably clear this up and they could direct the Village to someone who could measure the amount of radiation. Mr. Slingerland noted that the correct term was not radiation but rather radio transmissions and electromagnetic fields (EMFs). He noted that most household appliances produce EMFs. Mr. Powell noted that upon renewal of the permit the Village could add some terminology requiring that applicants prove their compliance with all of the standards and laws. Mr. Accurso asked if the facility proposed for the bell tower at Bellefair would be grandfathered. The Board discussed this matter, and Village Attorney Ken Powell stated that anything that is established prior to the law is grandfathered. He noted that Bellefair has site plan approval for the entire development. Mr. Miller stated that it would depend upon when the law is enacted and when the structure is actually complete. Trustee Degling noted that what was approved was a beacon light on an existing structure that was grandfathered. The ARB could consider approval of the construction of a bell tower to dress up the light tower. So, as far as he recalled, all that was approved was a pretty looking bell tower that wouldn't be any higher than the existing beacon, which could not be removed. Mr. Powell noted that until the Village enacted a moratorium or local law, there is no law on the books that would prevent them from installing a wireless communication facility in that tower. The Board agreed that a bell tower at Bellefair is much more attractive than other cellular antennae towers being constructed in other municipalities. The Board concluded their discussion of this draft law and moved on to the next agenda item. 12. RYE BROOK ZONING MAP. Christian Miller of F. P. Clark Associates stated that his office had prepared a memorandum, and noted that the Planning Board had reviewed this matter in February. The Planning Board unanimously recommended approval. The next step would be to set a public hearing and handle the appropriate public notice(s). Since the adoption of a new Zoning Map is an unusual action, he recommended that the Board decide procedurally how they wished to notify the public and when to hold public hearings. He noted that the main intent of the update was to prepare a more user-friendly map. Mayor Filipowski asked if anyone had comments. Village Administrator Russo suggested that this item -15- February 23, 1999 be published in the next newsletter in April. A public hearing could be scheduled right after that. Trustee Pellino stated that the intent was to create a new version of the zoning map showing the proper lines. 13. RED ROOF FARM -- BUILDING PERMITS. Mr. Russo noted that a letter was received from the developer of the property requesting that the Village consider issuing building permits on construction. It also offered a contribution to the Village's Recreation Fund for preparation of the site area that would ultimately be the ballfield on the dedicated land, with penalties of$250 per day if their work is not completed by May 15", in addition to the recreation fund contribution. Mr. Alec Ornstein spoke on behalf of his company, Ornstein Leyton, Inc., noting that there hade been some discussions with the mayor in reference to some of the questions raised. Since a sales office was opened in a suite at the Rye Town Hilton, over 20 units of the 40 homes had been contracted. This prompted the developer to request some relief from the conditions set down to be satisfied before building permits could be issued. This was addressed in several ways. A separate contractor was hired to do the off-site work, and the developer offered to be subjected to a penalty of$250 for each day if the work is not completed beyond May 15th. Mr. Ornstein understood that it is to his economic benefit to obtain building permits prior to the completion of the work, which would not be until May 15". The Mayor discussed a desire to begin the construction of the ballfield, which is part of the park dedication required in the resolution approving the subdivision of Red Roof Farm. After analysis with the Village Engineer, the estimated cost of doing the earth work to prepare the ballfield to be in the neighborhood of$160,000. This was difficult for the developer to come up with, but during a discussion a number of$40,000 came up to help with the cost of the earth work. Working with the Village Engineer and their own Project Manager, they attempted to resolve any issues that might come up in order to protect the Village. There was some discussion of using the ballfield area during the construction as a water retention basin, to address the concerns of surrounding homeowners. Mr. Carosi noted that construction is underway, and the detention area created is a modification of the proposed pond. This site always had a bit of a wetland function, since it tended to flood during heavier rainfalls, especially during spring time. That area is being utilized as it always has been. Village Attorney Ken Powell noted that as a matter of procedure, in order to amend the Resolution the Board would have to hold a public hearing. He noted that although drainage issue is the main issue, there were other conditions such as the condition of the sidewalk on Ridge Street and the deeding of the parkland to the Village. The Board would have to eliminate, waive, or defer between four and six conditions imposed at the time the Resolution was approved. Mr. Ornstein read through the six items listed on the Resolution. He noted Item#6 is complete; Item#5 is a matter of obtaining a deed after a survey; Item#4 calls for an asphalt sidewalk to be installed, and another item had to do with the condition of the site. A resident was concerned about the additional construction noise and the machinery that the residents of the area would be exposed to. As the Board may or may not be aware, a number of residents attended the last Board meeting with some objections to the noise from the construction. The off-site and on-site construction, with additional heavy equipment, would increase the noise. The developer noted there are off-site improvements taking place on Lincoln Avenue and Bonwit Road. The work is impressive and there is a tremendous amount of pipes going into the ground. There may be a -16- February 23, 1999 shock with regard to the magnitude of the work there. He assured everyone that they were doing what they could to alleviate problems. The noise levels that are generated by the pouring of the concrete and nailing is somewhat nominal compared to the work. The off-site work is occurring two to three streets away, whereas on the on-site work is proceeding—and the noise level should not be too bothersome. The noise will be worse in the summertime as people are outside, whereas in the winter people are indoors. The greatest noise would be from the concrete trucks during the digging of the foundations. With regard to the transfer of the deed to the Village, it was recommended that the developer hold on to that land and pay taxes on it for as long as possible until the Village was ready to construct the ballfield. Regarding the sidewalks, it would not be a problem if their installation was delayed for a month or two. The Mayor noted that there had been substantial rain during the period that property has been stripped down removing topsoil and trees. He felt that this should be discussed during the next public hearing. There was some discussion of the preparations and grading of lots 2, 3, 4 and 5. Gene Paulen, Project ,Manager, noted that Lot#3 does not really involve grading. The grading is on the adjacent lots, but on Lot #3 it is almost negligible. Lot#3 could be graded, but Lots#4, 5 and 6 could not be done. Mayor Filipowski requested further information regarding a donation that has been offered for work that is necessary in preparing the ballfield. He asked if it was possible to use equipment that is currently on the site to help in this preparation. The developer's represented note that the level of material that is there and that would need to be excavated, as well as the necessity of clean fill that would be need to be brought in, would cause a tremendous burden. In a letter from the developer it was noted that the cost of stripping and stockpiling would be about $3.00 per cubic yard and there are 20,000 yards involved and that cost would be more than 50% of what they offered; one of the greatest issues facing this development was trucking in new fill. The Village is currently looking at the land that is to be donated to the Village for the feasibility of constructing a new ballfield. Dimensions and locations are currently being worked on by the Recreation Department. One of the significant factors that is being investigated is the feasibility of completing this project. Mr. Carosi notedthat the land has a lot of topsoil on it, which is a good thing. However, when you try to make a ballfield you need a field that will drain quickly after a rainstorm to get it back into a shape that can be walked on. In order to do that in this particular area, one method that they are looking at is removing the topsoil and bring in large levels of foundation material that will be strong enough to build the field on top of and very porous to allow the field to drain quickly. The Board asked whether the plans shown to prospective purchasers noted the proposed ballfield. The file map or plan created by John Myers indicated that there would be a ballfield and the developer has represented that it will be there, although the site plan did not show it. The representation to the homeowners is that this property is part of the parkland and we believe that a ballfield will be constructed there; it is shown as parkland. Trustee Zuckerman stated that it is the goal of the Board to make sure that property owners around this site are protected. It was resolved that the Board of Trustees would conduct a public hearing at 7:30 p.m. on March 9, 1999 at the Village Hall located at 938 King Street in Rye Brook,New York on an application by Ornstein Leyton, Inc. to modify certain conditions to the Red Roof Farms subdivision resolution relating to the conditions of the issuance of building permits. -17- February 23, 1999 On the motion of Trustee Zuckerman, seconded by Trustee Degling, the following motion was adopted: TRUSTEE DEGLING VOTING AYE TRUSTEE PELLINO VOTING AYE TRUSTEE STRUM VOTING NO TRUSTEE ZUCKERMAN VOTING AYE MAYOR FILIPOWSKI VOTING AYE ADDENDUM: 14. PHOT TEEN PROGRAM. Mayor Filipowski called for the next item on the agenda regarding the Pilot Teen Program. Mr. Russo read the following Resolution which set a daily entrance charge of$5.00 was set for each member and guest. A daily refreshment charge of$3.00, for member and guest, was also set. This program is set for the Posilipo Center, on March 14"'from 6:30 until 10:00 p.m. Tom Hroncich, Superintendent of the Rye Brook Recreation Department, noted that the charges are not meant to make the program break even but rather to defray some of the costs. Mr. Hroncich was asked for an estimate of cost for this program. Mr. Hroncich responded that the Village did not know how many children would participate in this program, but the amount estimated was approximately $2,000 for March through June, additional costs would be about $600. This expense would change based on attendance. On the motion of Trustee Zuckerman, seconded by Trustee Pellino, the following resolution was adopted: RESOLUTION PILOT TEEN PROGRAM FEES AND CHARGES RESOLVED,that on the recommendation of the Superintendent of Parks and Recreation, the Board of Trustees hereby authorizes the following charges for the Pilot Teen Program: Program Fee Daily entrance charge $5 For each Member and Guest Daily refreshment charge $3 For each Member and Guest who opts to purchase refreshments (i.e. pizza and soda) TRUSTEE DEGLING VOTING AYE TRUSTEE PELLINO VOTING AYE TRUSTEE STRUM VOTING AYE TRUSTEE ZUCKERMAN VOTING AYE MAYOR FILIPOWSKI VOTING AYE -18- February 23, 1999 Mayor Filipowski noted that the next Trustee Meetings were scheduled for March 9"'and March 23`", and he opened the floor for comments from members of the public. Mr. Ken Heller of Lincoln Avenue addressed the Board. He commented on a discussion of sales taxes versus property taxes, the parkland dedication from Bellefair, and expressed a concern that staging may be currently taking place on the Village's property and asked if the Village had recourse regarding putting the land back into its original form. Like Red Roof, it seems as if they are using the land to be dedicated to the Village for their own purposes during construction, and the Village does not know what condition it will be in when it will be dedicated. He hoped that someone would go over and take a look at this property—using a map to determine whether or not they are using land that is to be dedicated to the Village and what damages are being done; and whether or not it will be corrected before we receive it. Mr. Russo noted that the developers current staging area is probably part of the land that would be dedicated to the Village. Mr. Carosi said Mr. Heller raised a good question and promised to look into it. Mr. Peter Silton of BonwitRoad noted that two weeks ago at the Village Board meeting he was told that the pipes placed on his lawn by the contractors for Red Roof would be removed. Now, two weeks later, the pipes are in the same place. He asked if the homeowners would be reimbursed for the damage to their lawns. He also asked about an article in the Westmore News where Chief Robert Santoro commented that some of the complaints regarding the construction were exaggerated. He asked if the Chief was properly quoted, and if the Board agreed with him. Mayor Filipowski stated that this was not his view. Mr. Carosi noted the contractor had pipes delivered to be utilized later on in the process on homes along Bonwit Road. The contractor began to move the pipe and had been stockpiling it in Pine Ridge Park. The pipes left on people's lawns are the pipes that will be installed in the immediate area. It is very large pipe and it was felt that it was better to leave it where it was rather than risk further damage and inconvenience by moving the pipe around. Every day, as they contractor was excavating the area, the pipe is being installed. The work had been slowed down by rock-- in the last week 20 to 30 feet of progress had been made. Mr. Carosi noted that it is very slow, noisy and dusty work, but when the rock is gone passed the job will move along faster. Trustee Zuckerman addressed an issue of the Agenda of the Westchester County legislature, which had been copied to the Board. The item was the Anderson Hill Road rehabilitation, and noted that the County was listing it as being in Harrison/Rye and since it does not go to Rye he assumed that it meant Rye Brook. He felt that the residents would appreciate knowing about the work taking place on Anderson Hill Road. The second item he raised was the growth of the community. He asked for a sense from the Board regarding supporting a Resolution to establish a zip code for Rye Brook. He felt that Rye Brook was going to be a community of approximately 10,000 people in a few years and felt that it was time that the Village looked into this and made a formal request to the Post Office. Trustee Pellino requested a short executive session after the meeting regarding contractual negotiations on fire service. Mayor Filipowski asked for a motion and a vote, and the motion was made by Trustee Pellino, seconded by Trustee Strum, and unanimously approved by the Board. Trustee Strum commented regarding the zip code. He noted that he had visited the Port Chester Post Office over the weekend and a sign that had said, "Port Chester - 10573;Rye Brook- 10573" had been removed from the Port Chester Post Office, and it only listed Port Chester. Additionally, he noted that -19- February 23, 1999 . the Post Office has a sign posted that federal tax forms are available at the Port Chester Public Library and at the New York State Taxation Office located at 90 South Ridge Street, Port Chester,New York-- he stated that the Post Office is incorrect, since 90 South Ridge Street is in Rye Brook,New York. He asked the Village Administrator to inform the Port Chester Post Office that this location is in Rye Brook and to remind them that they agreed to post an official sign noting Rye Brook's zip code as 1.0573. Trustee Degling commented on the appearance of Rye Brook. He noted that in the Saturday issue of The Journal News reports all public meetings, but that Rye Brook's meeting was missing. He had noted this issue before and now asked the Village Administration to forward the information to The Journal News. Mr. Slingerland noted that he had contacted the newspaper and there is a new reporter from The Journal News assigned to cover Rye Brook stories. The process has changed and the Village is in the process of coordinating that with Gannett, since they require notice a few weeks in advance of a meeting in order to publish the meeting schedule. The Village notifies the press the week before a meeting, but there are times when meetings are not scheduled that far in advance. Mayor Filipowski recognized Mr. Carosi for receiving the award from the Westchester Putnam Chapter of Professional Engineers Association for the"Young Engineer of the Year." The Village also gave him a proclamation to coincide with receipt of this award. The Mayor thanked Mr. Carosi very much. There being no further business before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at 10:10 p.m. Respectfu y submitted Christopher J. Russo, Village Administrator/Clerk -20-