HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995-11-14 - Board of Trustees Meeting Minutes MINUTES OF A REGULAR BOARD MEETING ® �
VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK
BOARD OF TRUSTEES
VILLAGE OFFICES
90 SOUTH RIDGE STREET
RYE BROOK,NEW YORK
NOVEMBER 14, 1995
CONVENE MEETING:
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Cresenzi at 7:45 p.m, in the Meeting Room and the
Pledge of Allegiance followed.
Present were the following members of the Board:
Mayor Salvatore M. Cresenzi
Trustee Joseph Pellino
Trustee Nancy Stein Tunis
Trustee Gary J. Zuckerman
Also present were:
Christopher J. Russo, Village Administrator
Lori Ann DeMarco, Assistant to Village Administrator
Rocco V. Circosta, Director of Public Works
Lisa B. Marinaccio, Secretary to the Village Board
Christian Miller, Frederick P. Clark Associates
Absebt: Joseph Cortese, Treasurer
1
0O-964
November 14, 1995
RESOLUTIONS
1. MERRITT & HOLBY
200 SOUTH RIDGE STREET
SECTION 1; BLOCK 23; LOTS 1A-2B, 3 AND 4
APPROVAL OF SITE PLAN AMENDMENT.
ORTHOPEDIC MEDICAL OFFICE.
Mayor Cresenzi announced that the first item on the agenda was a resolution concerning the
approval of a medical office at 200 South Ridge Street. Mayor Cresenzi asked Mr.Russo to read
the resolution.
Trustee Pellino brought up a concern of certain trees that border the rear properties as well as an
issue that was previously mentioned by Mr. Heller concerning a maple in the front of the property.
Trustee Pellino added that he had questioned whether or not the trees that died at the rear of the
property had been replaced in accordance with the original site plan approval. Trustee Pellino
mentioned that it was his understanding that Mr. Steve Yarabek, the Village's Landscape
Architect, was asked to report back to the Village Board. Mr. Circosta reported that Mr.
Yarabek did visit the site and he did send a report via telefax that indicated that there are trees
that have died along the rear of the property (the westerly boundary line.) Mr. Circosta explained
that one of the reasons listed in Mr. Yarabek's correspondence was a lack of water. Mr. Circosta
said that another issue in the correspondence was that the trees are somewhat shaded because of
the existence of the retaining wall and the fence, but nonetheless,there are dead trees in that area
that need to be replaced. Trustee Pellino asked Mr. Circosta what kind of trees he was referring
to and Mr. Circosta said mostly white pine trees in the subject area. Trustee Pellino referred to a
landscape plan that was indicated in the original approval. Mr. Circosta told the Board that the
trees that were looked at by the Landscape Architect were the ones that the developer at that
time, had planted(as a condition of the site plan approval) and not necessarily the existing trees
that were there prior to the construction of the shopping center. Mr. Circosta added that there is
a tree in the front of the center that is in a state of decline(maple tree that Mr. Heller had brought
up in previous discussions.) Trustee Pellino expressed that his concern was that those trees must
be replaced under the terms and conditions of the original site plan approval, but he did not want
to be unreasonable because the planting season is not right now. Trustee Pellino added that he
felt that there should be some type of guarantee that these trees will be replaced in the future in
accordance with the original site plan approval.
Mr. Circosta suggested that as part of this resolution, there should be some language that
indicates that the landscaping along the Crescent Place property line will be attended to in order
to ensure that those plantings will take place at the appropriate time of the year. Trustee Pellino
said that the resolution that is before the Village Board for this meeting does not seem to pose a
problem with him, but he felt that the tree plantings are important. Trustee Pellino requested
some type of method as a requirement(possibly a performance bond)that will ensure that
appropriate plantings be installed during the next planting season, Trustee Tunis said that she was
in favor of Trustee Pellino's suggestions regarding tree planting because she felt that it would
protect the Village's interest and it would allow the doctor to occupy her space without any undue
hesitation. Trustee Tunis thought it would be unfair to influence the doctor's ability to occupy
that space because of stipulations on trees that cannot be replaced at this time of year. Trustee
Tunis stated that she would be in favor of a$5.000.00 performance bond to ensure the plantings.
2
November 14, 1995 005965
Trustee Zuckerman said that he agreed with the concept of a bond, and it is something that should
be considered for future developments where the site plan has landscaping provisions in it because
there have been a few other projects that have been carried out both commercial and residential,
where the site plans have been very specific regarding tree plans and plantings; and the developers
have either ignored those plans, or have not responded when the plantings died.
Mr. Kenneth Heller, 20 Lincoln Avenue, came forward and stated that it is still possible to plant
trees in the next three to four weeks, and he did not feel that $5,000.00 was an adequate amount.
Mr. Powell conveyed that the bond should not be considered a penalty because it is really a sum
of money to guarantee that a particular item gets done. Trustee Pellino did not want the tree
issue to hold up the doctors application. Mr. Powell said that the language in the resolution
should indicate that if the site plan conditions are not adhered to, it would be a violation of the
site plan approval which could be prosecuted in the Town Court. Mr. Miller agreed with Mr.
Powell in that there is a previously approved site plan that showed landscaping on the site and if
landscaping is not maintained as shown on that plan, then a penalty would have to be paid by the
developer. Mr. Powell determined that the penalty would be $250.00 or 15 days for each offense.
Mayor Cresenzi said that the language in the ordinance that governs that should be made clear so
that it could be a compounding or an accumulative offense. Trustee Pellino said that he felt that
$5,000.00 was a reasonable bond amount. Mr. Peter Oldani, Developer, came forward and told
the Board that the activity on Crescent Place was not a part of the original site plan, but the
applicant agreed to take remedial action to help the situation with the neighbors. Mr. Oldani
touched on the discussion about penalties ($250.00) and assumed that penalties would originate
from a citation from the Building Department. Mr. Oldani said that he was unsure whether it
would pertain to the time of year because as previously mentioned,opinions on when plantings
could take place and be successful can differ from person to person. Trustee Pellino suggested
that the Village does not put the applicant in a position of being cited,but rather give the
applicant the time during the next planting season to do an affective job of complying with the
original site plan approval with respect to tree plantings. Trustee Pellino explained that the object
was not to put the applicant in a penalty situation, but to get the landscaping and the tree
preservation plan properly in place.
Mayor Cresenzi brought up the issue of parking spaces and pointed out that if the Board does
grant a waiver of five parking spaces,it does not prohibit the applicant from requesting another
waiver because there was a previous request from the Bagel Company for an additional waiver on
parking which is controlled by the Zoning Board of Appeals. Mr. Miller reported that with
respect to the parking issue,the applicant is asking for a waiver of five spaces which seems
reasonable, but if those conditions were to change; a waiver of parking spaces may become
unreasonable. Mr. Miller said that in this case, because the site is significantly under-utilized,he
did not feel the wavering of five parking spaces will cause a problem for the other existing uses in
the shopping center. Mayor Cresenzi mentioned that what he was trying to point out was the way
the process would work if this application were to be denied. Mayor Cresenzi explained that it
would be conceivable that the applicant could build at a reduced number of square feet and
immediately apply to the Zoning Board for relief because that is what has happened in the past
with the Bagel Store. Trustee Zuckerman questioned whether a different user for this same space
would have to come back to the Village for any change from the existing use.
3
November 14, 1995 005966
Mr. Miller touched on the approval resolution from 1992 that indicated that the area that is shown
on Sheet 4 of 6 (rear- lower level) shall be used by the applicant only for storage purposes and it
shall not be used for any purposes without applicant's compliance with standard site plan review
procedures. Trustee Zuckerman stated that he wanted an interpretation of the original approval
resolution in order to understand what would happen if the current user moved out and a new
user came in, would it need to come before the Village for site plan review. Mr. Miller said that
under the stipulations of the resolution,they would have to come back before the Village Board.
Mr. Powell touched on the issue of the parking space waiver and told the Board that if they
wanted to link it only to the orthopedic use, it should indicate that explicitly in the resolution. Mr.
Powell added that any change in use of the space would come back to the Board for a separate
site plan review which he recommended be made explicit in this resolution as well. Trustee
Zuckerman stated that he felt that the parking waiver should be linked to the orthopedic use.
Trustee Stein Tunis suggested that the language of the approval state that the applicant should
come back to the Village Board only if the use changes to another use such as retail,but not if it
changes to another medical office. Mr. Powell stated that the parking requirements for a retail
use would be lower. Mayor Cresenzi did not want the parking waiver to be linked to a specific
tenant use because if the use remains the same (medical office) it should be left alone and not have
to come back to the Village.
SITE PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION
200 SOUTH RIDGE STREET
SECTION 1, BLOCK 23,LOTS 1A-2B, 3 AND 4
MERRITT & HOLBY ASSOCIATES
WESTCHESTER MEDICAL REHABILITATION; DR. CARDENAS
ORTHOPEDIC MEDICAL OFFICE
On Motion made by Trustee Zuckerman, seconded by Trustee Pellino,the following Resolution
was hereby adopted as amended:
WHEREAS,on or about June 23, 1992, a Resolution was adopted by the Board of
Trustees granting site plan approval for the construction of an approximately 33,000 square foot
shopping center at 200 South Ridge Street; and
WHEREAS,the rear area of the building is in close proximity to an existing residential
neighborhood and,on account thereof, was restricted to a storage use under condition 9 of the
Resolution which reads as follows:
(9) The area that is shown as an enclosed room on Sheet 4 of 6 of the above noted site
plans shall be used by the applicant only for storage purposes and shall not be used
for any other purpose without the applicant's compliance with standard site plan
review procedures as set for in Chapter 209 of the Village of Rye Brook;
and
WHEREAS, as set forth in the minutes of the June 23, 1992 meeting of the Board of
Trustees on the original site plan application,the applicant assented to this condition; and
WHEREAS, on November 23, 1993, the Board of Trustees approved a site plan
amendment application for an interconnecting driveway between the Shopping Center at 200
South Ridge Street and the adjacent Rye Ridge Shopping Center; and
4
November 14, 1995 00596 ,1
WHEREAS, on or about March 29, 1994,the Board of Trustees approved an amended
site plan for use of part of the restricted storage space (approximately, 3,600 sq. ft.) for an
optometrist medical office and denied a site plan amendment to utilize a different portion of the
restricted storage space for a Gymboree; and
WHEREAS,on or about July 20, 1995,the applicant made another application for use of
3,300 square feet of the restricted storage space for use as an orthopedic medial office, which
application includes a request under Section 250-6(G) (1) (b)that the Board of Trustees waive
five(5) of the twenty-two(22)off-street parking spaces required for the use; and
WHEREAS,on or about August 3, 1995,the application was referred to the Planning
Board which on September 14, 1995 recommended approval of the site plan application subject to
conditions regarding a re-application upon a change of use,the provision of acceptable screening
on Crescent Place, and restricted hours of operation; and
WHEREAS,the application consists of the following plans:
200 South Ridge Street, Dr. Cardenas, dated July 20, 1995,prepared by Peter M.
Oldani, P.E. (2 sheets) ;
200 South Ridge Street, portion of construction plan, one page labeled 2 of 6,
dated June 2, 1992,prepared by Rocco V. D'Andrea, Inc., last revised February
11, 1993, (one sheet)on which five circles are shown,numbered 1 through 5,
representing proposed sign locations; and
An Untitled Sketch Plan, undated,no preparer indicated, consisting of 3 pages, on
which 5 signs are depicted;
Survey Map of portion of Lot No. 2 and a portion of Thorvald Drive Block A,
Map 2650,prepared for M& H Associates by Rocco V. D'Andrea, Inc,, certified
by William Giel,dated June 20, 1994.
WHEREAS, on October 24, 1995,the Board of Trustees conducted a public hearing on
the site plan amendment application after due notice.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED,that the action is found to be an unlisted action under the State
Environmental Quality Review Act and a Negative Environmental Declaration is adopted, and the
lead agency determines that the proposed action will not have a significant effect on the
environment and a draft environmental impact statement will not be prepared; and it is
FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Trustees grants for a medical office use, a
parking space waiver of 5 parking spaces; and it is
FURTHER RESOLVED, that the site plan amendment application is approved subject
to the following modifications and conditions:
5
November 14, 1995 005.9(;6
1. Lighting at the rear of the site shall be utilized so as not to interfere with the ~
reasonable enjoyment of adjacent residential properties. No additional lighting
beyond that shown on the existing lighting plan shall be installed nor shall
illuminated signs be installed at the rear of the shopping center, except that the
orthopedic use may have a sign which is adequately lit so it can be seen by patrons,
comparable to the illumination of the optometrist office sign. The level and
dispersal of lighting in and about the rear of the shopping center shall be adjusted
following commencement of the use at the reasonable direction of the Director of
Public Works.
2. In view of the change of use from storage, and to protect the adjacent residential
neighborhood, additional landscaping shall be planted along Crescent Place,
satisfactory to the Director of Public Works. The landscaping shall be adequately
maintained, and dead or diseased plantings shall be replaced, as needed,
satisfactory to the Director of Public Works.
3. The applications for signage which was referred to the Board of Trustees on site
plan review under Section 250-35(L) (4) (a) (1)of the Zoning Law is determined
and modified as follows:
a. Freestanding sign, South Ridge Street(#5.) Denied. The request is for the
addition of a 12 inch by 6 foot sign at the bottom of the existing
freestanding sign. This will result in a freestanding sign greater than the 20
square feet maximum under Table II of Sign Regulations. One of the
existing spaces in the existing sign can be utilized for the sign.
b. Wall sign, front of 200 South Ridge Street building (#4.) Denied. One
wall sign per business is allowed under Table II of the Sign Regulations.
The medical office is to be located in the rear of the building and a wall
sign is requested at that location. A second wall sign in the front of the
building for the same business is not permitted.
C. Directional/Informational sign, front parking area on wall(#3.) Modified.
The sketch drawing shows a sign of 4 sq, ft. at a location in the parking
area which would direct patients to the rear area of the shopping center to
locate Westchester Medical Rehabilitation. Under Table II of the Sign
Regulations,directional/informational signs up to 1.5 sq. ft. are allowed
This sign is acceptable if it is reduced in size to 1.5 sq. ft.
d. Directional/informational or freestanding sign,rear parking area on wall
(#2.) Modified. A freestanding sign of 12 square feet is proposed at a
location in the rear parking area to stand next to another freestanding sign
for Copeland optometrists. As presently proposed, this sign is not
permitted. To the extent it is a freestanding sign, it is non-complying with
the one freestanding sign per street frontage requirement together with the
total freestanding sign size limit of 20 square feet. To the extent that the
sign is directional/informational,it is significantly larger than the L5 sq. ft.
requirement. The sign as proposed cannot be approved under Table II of
the Sign Regulation. This sign may be combined with the Copeland sign
into one freestanding sign complying with the Sign Regulations.
6
November 14, 1995 005961
e. Wall sign,rear area of building (#1.) This sign is approved, subject to the
illuminations provisions in condition Number 1.
4. A performance bond in the sum determined by the Village's Landscape Architect
for the replanting necessary to fulfill the provisions of the original landscaping
plan, shall be posted by the applicant prior to occupancy of the orthopedic office.
5. A change of use of the space to a non-medical use shall be subject to site plan
approval;
and it is
FURTHER RESOLVED, that the existing amended site plan for 200 South Ridge Street
shall remain in effect and shall not be deemed modified except as provided in this Resolution.
TRUSTEE TUNIS VOTING AYE
TRUSTEE ZUCKERMAN VOTING AYE
TRUSTEE PELLINO VOTING AYE
MAYOR CRESENZI VOTING AYE
2. DESIGNATING DATE OF VILLAGE ELECTION AND OFFICES TO BE
FILLED:
RESOLUTION
DESIGNATING DATE OF VILLAGE ELECTION
AND OFFICES TO BE FILLED
VILLAGE ELECTION
On Motion made by Trustee Zuckerman, seconded by Trustee Stein Tunis,the following
Resolution was hereby adopted:
WHEREAS,pursuant to Section 15-104, Sub. 3(a) of the election Law, the Village Clerk
shall, at least four months prior to the General village Election,publish a notice
designating the date of the village election,the office(s)to be filled at such election and
the term(s)thereof:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED,that the Board of Trustees of the Village of Rye Brook hereby authorizes that the
following Public Notice be posted and also published in the Daily Item and in the Westmore
News, the Official Newspapers of the Village of Rye Brook:
PUBLIC NOTICE
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the next General Election in the Village of Rye Brook is to be
held on Tuesday,March 19, 1996; and
PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that the offices to be filled are: Mayor(1) and Trustees
(2)for a two-year term of office commencing at noon on Monday, April 1, 1996 and concluding
at noon on the first Monday in April, 1998; and Trustee (1)to fill an unexpired term concluding at
noon on the first Monday in April, 1997.
7
November 14, 1995 lJ
By Order of the Board of Trustees
Village of Rye Brook,New York
Salvatore M. Cresenzi, Mayor
Christopher J. Russo, Village Clerk
TRUSTEE TUNIS VOTING AYE
TRUSTEE ZUCKERMAN VOTING AYE
TRUSTEE PELLINO VOTING AYE
MAYOR CRESENZI VOTING AYE
3. APPROVAL OF TRAVEL REQUESTS:
RESOLUTION
APPROVAL OF TRAVEL REQUESTS
On Motion made by Trustee Pellino, seconded by Trustee Zuckerman,the following Resolution
was hereby adopted:
RESOLVED,that the Village Administrator shall be responsible for pre-approving travel
requests of Village officials and employees to attend conferences or conventions related to Village
duties; and it is further
RESOLVED,this policy shall not apply to the Mayor and Board of Trustees or to travel
approvals governed by a collective bargaining agreement; and it is further
RESOLVED,that this policy on travel requests is adopted under Section 77-b(2) of the General
Municipal Law and Section 4-4 of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook.
TRUSTEE TUNIS VOTING AYE
TRUSTEE ZUCKERMAN VOTING AYE
TRUSTEE PELLINO VOTING AYE
MAYOR CRESENZI VOTING AYE
4. EXTENDING SUBDIVISION APPROVAL-NISSON SUBDIVISION
BEECHWOOD BOULEVARD/KING STREET
SECTION 1: BLOCK 10; LOT 4:
Trustee Zuckerman touched on a letter from Gioffre&Gioffre, Attorney for the
Applicant,that indicated that the Port Chester Board of Trustees re-approved the plan based on a
change in zoning in the Port Chester portion of this development from an R-7 district to an R-20
district. Trustee Zuckerman said that in doing that, the lot lines of the adjacent parcel changed.
Trustee Zuckerman requested an explanation of what exactly the Board was extending since he
assumed that the applicant's attorney will be coming back before the Village to change Lot#1.
Trustee Zuckerman ultimately was asking if the subdivision that will be extended by this
resolution was the same subdivision that was initially before the Village. Mr. Miller said that if
there has been a change in the lot lines,it would be considered a change in the initial plan that was
dated March 24, 1994, and it would have to come back before the Village.
8
November 14, 1995 {Q11
PA1 0,59 i'l.
Trustee Pellino said that the lot line that is moving is in the Village of Port Chester,but Rye
Brook's subdivision regulations indicate that if a municipal boundary straddles the property; the
more restrictive zoning should take precedence. Trustee Pellino explained that basically what the
Board was looking at was an R-20 Zoning District in Port Chester versus an R-20 Zoning District
in Rye Brook which is the same. Trustee Pellino said that the only thing that is different is the
location of the lot line.
Trustee Pellino said that once the lot line moves, the lot that will still be straddling the two
municipalities will still be in conformance in total area to the Rye Brook Zoning Code which really
constitutes no change. Trustee Pellino requested an updated map to show that the lot area of the
lot that straddles the municipalities still contains the required area. Trustee Zuckerman brought
up the plan that Mr. Circosta received from the Village of Port Chester. Trustee Zuckerman said
that those plans show changed lots. Mr. Circosta explained that the lot line of Lot#2 (which is
totally in the Village of Port Chester)has changed. Trustee Zuckerman said that would also
change the adjacent lot line which is partly within the Village of Port Chester and partly within the
Village of Rye Brook. Mr. Circosta told Trustee Zuckerman that was correct, and explained that
the lot change does not effect the area of Lot#1, but the lot line was moved. Trustee Zuckerman
brought up the letter from Gioffre& Gioffre which stated that the new approval complies with the
new Port Chester Zone,but the Village of Rye Brook is being asked to extend their previous
approval which is not for the same plan that the Village of Port Chester approved. Trustee
Zuckerman said that they must come back before the Village of Rye Brookto change the lot line
that is indicated as being changed on the new map.
Mayor Cresenzi clarified that what this application is asking for is an extension of what the
Village of Rye Brook previously approved. Trustee Zuckerman said that the letter from Gioffre
& Gioffre indicated that the applicant needs the extension so that they can submit the approved
plat to the Westchester County Department of Health. Trustee Zuckerman wished to know from
the applicant which plat they were planning to submit to the County Health Department.
Mr. Circosta said that the prior subdivision plat that was approved by the Village of Rye
Brook's Board of Trustees was processed by Westchester County Health Department because he
recalled writing letters regarding the sanitary sewer. Mr. Circosta said he did not recall that
approval coming back from the County to date. Trustee Pellino suggested that the resolution
have a "finther resolved" in the language requesting that the applicant submit a copy of the
subdivision plat being filed with the County Clerk's office to the Village of Rye Brook for
approval in advance. Mr. Miller said that if the subdivision map has been changed, it must come
back to the Village of Rye Brook for an amended subdivision approval application. Mr. Powell
stated that the applicant's letter which refers to a plat to be filed in the County's Clerk's office
leaves an issue as to what the extension would signify, and if the Village wants to reserve from
that, it could be provided for explicitly in the resolution by saying that this resolution will not
constitute approval of the revised plat which will require an amended subdivision approval from
the Village of Rye Brook. Trustee Zuckerman said that he felt that a representative for the
applicant should have been here to explain this situation.
9
November 14, 1995 005972
EXTENSION OF SUBDIVISION APPROVAL
NISSON SUBDIVISION
BEECHWOOD BOULEVARD/KING STREET
SECTION 1; BLOCK 10; LOT 4
On Motion made by Trustee Pellino, seconded by Trustee Zuckerman,the following Resolution
was hereby adopted as amended:
RESOLVED,that the Resolution of approval of the Nisson Subdivision adopted on May 25,
1995 and extended on August 8, 1995, is hereby further extended for 90 days to and including
February 23, 1996,provided that this extension shall not constitute approval of any plat other
than the plat approved on May 25, 1995
TRUSTEE TUNIS VOTING AYE
TRUSTEE ZUCKERMAN VOTING AYE
TRUSTEE PELLINO VOTING AYE
MAYOR CRESENZI VOTING AYE
CHECK REGISTER:
RESOLUTION
CHECK REGISTER
On Motion made by Trustee Pellino, seconded by Trustee Zuckerman,the following Resolution
was hereby adopted:
WHEREAS, the following checks,representing payment for services rendered,have been
submitted to the Treasurer's Office for payment and have been certified to by the Village
Administrator:
On-Line Checks: 12759-12858
Pre Paid: NONE
Payroll Checks: 17577-17664
_Environmental: NONE
Capital: 2406-2411
Capital Pre Paid NONE
Birthday Run: NONE
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED,that this Board hereby approves payment of the above mentioned claims and
authorizes payment thereof.
TRUSTEE TUNIS VOTING AYE
TRUSTEE ZUCKERMAN VOTING AYE
TRUSTEE PELLINO VOTING AYE
MAYOR CRESENZI VOTING AYE
10
November 14, 1995 005973
SPECIAL REPORT
6. SALE OF SURPLUS EQUIPMENT:
Mr.Russo said that the submitted list was modified to include the addition of a few lawn
mowers. Mr.Russo said there is an opportunity for an auction, and a resolution needs to be
passed which is recommended by the Village Attorney. Mr. Russo said that the Village has used
this method twice before and received considerably more money for surplus equipment, Mr.
Russo told the Board that the auction will take place that weekend (November 18, 1995)in the
City of Rye.
RESOLUTION
SALE OF SURPLUS EQUIPMENT
On Motion made by Trustee Pellino, seconded by Trustee Zuckerman,the following Resolution
was hereby adopted:
WHEREAS,the Village of Rye Brook has declared the attached list of vehicles and equipment as
surplus; and
WHEREAS, the Village of Rye Brook is desirous of obtaining the greatest return on these
vehicles and equipment;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Village of Rye Brook hereby contracts with
Jill Doherty, Auctioneer,to publicly dispose of this equipment at a public auction and in
agreement with the attached contract; and
FURTHER RESOLVED,that the Village Administrator shall be authorized to enter into such
agreement with Jill Doherty, Auctioneer; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED,that the Village Administrator shall establish minimum bids if
so required.
TRUSTEE TUNIS VOTING AYE
TRUSTEE ZUCKERMAN VOTING AYE
TRUSTEE PELLINO VOTING AYE
MAYOR CRESENZI VOTING AYE
11
November 14, 1995 005974
ITEMS FOR NOVEMBER 28, 1995 MEETING
1. APPROVAL DAY CAMP PROGRAM AND FEE SCHEDULE:
Mayor Cresenzi reported that a resolution dealing with a change in day camp fees would
be on the agenda for the meeting of November 28, 1995. Mayor Cresenzi added that under
written communication for that meeting,he wished to include a letter from Dr. Gentile with
regard to the Hawthorne Avenue subdivision process. Mr.Russo said that Thomas Hroncich
wanted the Board to know that if anyone had any questions on the day camp fee proposal,they
should inquire before the meeting date because the very next day, the fee schedule must be sent
press because it is a change that they wished to put into their next newsletter. Trustee Pellino said
that for the November 28, 1995, he wished to schedule a public hearing on the revised Home
Occupation Regulations. Trustee Pellino explained that the Zoning Update Committee had
distributed to the Village Attorney, a final draft. Mayor Cresenzi said that on November 28,
1995, the Board will call for the public hearing on Home Occupations Regulations. Trustee Tunis
wished to thank, on behalf of the Board and Rye Brook residents, the Highway Department for
doing a wonderful job in cleaning up all of the damage from the storm. Trustee Tunis said that
roads looked fabulous and the Highway men and Mr. Circosta should be thanked for their hard
work.
ADJOURNMENT:
Trustee Zuckerman made a motion for adjournment at 8:45 p.m. and Trustee Tunis
seconded the motion.
Respectfully Submitted
Christopher J. Russo/Village Clerk
12