HomeMy WebLinkAbout1988-10-25 - Board of Trustees Meeting Minutes VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK
"I BOARD OF TRUSTEES
REGULAR MEETING
OCTOBER 25, 1988
8:00 P.M.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. SUBDIVISION APPROVAL: AVITABLE - 33 HILLCREST AVENUE
2. AMENDMENT TO PUD REGULATIONS (Continued)
3. HERITAGE DEIS (Continued)
4. RYE BROOK NORTH DGEIS (Continued)
5. PROPOSED LOCAL LAW #8-1988 - CODE ENFORCEMENT (Revised)
6. CERASO SUBDIVISION - 67 SOUTH RIDGE STREET
APPOINTMENTS/AUTHORIZATION
7. CHECK REGISTER AUTHORIZATION
! � DISCUSSION
8. NEW YORK-AMERICAN WATER CO. - WATER SUPPLY ADVISORY
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
9. SEPTEMBER 27, 1988
OCTOBER 04, 1988
OCTOBER 11, 1988
RESOLUTIONS/AGREEMENTS
10. RYE RIDGE SHOPPING CENTER - REQUEST TO USE VILLAGE STREETS
11. NYS EXECUTIVE DEPT. - DIVISION OF YOUTH PROJECT APPLICATION
12. DESIGNATION OF VILLAGE ELECTION - MARCH 21, 1989
13. CARLUCCI SANITATION - BREACH OF CONTRACT/FORFEITURE OF BOND
NEXT MEETING DATES
REGULAR MEETING - NOVEMBER 22, 1988
REGULAR MEETING - DECEMBER 13, 1988
Recycling is a Good Investment!
i
00121 J
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK, HELD ON THE
25th DAY OF OCTOBER, 1988 IN THE
VILLAGE OFFICES
90 SOUTH RIDGE STREET
RYE BROOK, NEW YORK
CONVENE MEETING
The Regular Meeting of the Board of Trustees was called to order
by Mayor Cresenzi at 8:10 P.M. in the Meeting Room and the
Pledge of Allegiance followed.
Present were the following members of the Board:
Mayor Salvatore M. Cresenzi
Trustee Francis L. Filipowski
Trustee Michele R. Mendicino
Trustee Robert J. Ravich
Trustee Jane Saffir Smith was not in attendance at this meeting.
Also present were:
Georgia Kramer, Corporation Counsel
Joseph Cortese, Village Treasurer
Robert P. Gerardi, Assistant Building Inspector
Denise Carbone, Public Stenographer
Jean A. Marra, Deputy Village Clerk
The Village Administrator, Christopher J. Russo, and Rocco V.
Circosta, the Director of Public Works, were not in attendance
at this meeting.
001 ?2r0
October 25, 1988
PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. SUBDIVISION APPROVAL: AVITABLE - 33 HILLCREST AVENUE
On motion by Trustee Ravich, seconded by Trustee Filipowski, it
was unanimously
RESOLVED, that the Public Hearings be,
and they hereby are, declared open.
Bruno Gioffre, Esq. appeared on behalf of his client and stated
that this application has been pending for approximately three
years. A portion of the property lies partially in the Village
of Port Chester, so subdivision approval will also have to be
obtained from them, he said.
The Zoning Board of Appeals approved the variance in July, 1988
on the condition that an existing porch be removed -- one lot
{ I would then be conforming and one would not, Mr. Gioffre noted.
He added that the distance required for the side yard setback
would be the greatest from the neighboring property owner,
Liberati.
i
In answer to a question raised by Mayor Cresenzi, Attorney
Kramer stated that the lots were non-conforming and when one
owner owns them, it's deemed as one conforming lot if they
existed prior to 1964; the Board has the discretion to consider
the lots as not "merged."
Trustee Filipowski said that no building permit would be issued
until the existing porch was removed and a discussion concerning
the side yard setbacks followed. Mr. Gioffre explained the
zoning requirements and how the setbacks would be handled.
Afterward, on motion by Trustee Ravich, seconded by Trustee
Mendicino, the following resolution was unanimously adopted:
2 -
0012 1.
October 25, 1988
AVITABLE SUBDIVISION APPROVAL
33 HILLCREST AVENUE
SECTION 1, BLOCK 18, LOTS 6 & 7
WHEREAS, an application for Subdivision
Approval was submitted by Paul Avitable for a
parcel of land located at 33 Hillcrest Avenue
and known on the Tax Assessment Map of the
Village of Rye Brook at Section 1, Block 18,
Lots 6 & 7; and
WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held on the
25th day of October, 1988 and the Board of
Trustees has heard those persons desiring to
be heard thereon;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED, that this Board hereby grants
Subdivision Approval on the above-described
premises located at 33 Hillcrest Avenue; and
be it
FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Mayor be and
hereby is authorized to sign the Subdivision
Map upon subdivision approval being granted
by the Village of Port Chester; and be it
FURTHER RESOLVED, that the side yard porch on
the existing home be removed; and be it
FURTHER RESOLVED, that the location of the
driveway on the new subdivided lot be
approved by the Building Inspector; and be it
FURTHER RESOLVED, that the greater side yard
setback shall be on the south side of the
newly created building lot; and it is
FURTHER RESOLVED, that the conditions imposed
by the Zoning Board of Appeals, dated July 5,
1988, in connection with the continuing non-
conforming use, be complied with.
i
i
- 3 -
001 .?
I( October 25, 1988
(A Public Stenographer was present for Items #2, 3 and 4; and
that record will become a permanent part of the minutes. )
2. AMENDMENT TO PUD REGULP..TIONS (Continued)
Mayor Cresenzi said he received a request from the Planning
Board that this matter be adjourned until November 22nd.
Trustee Ravich then announced that due to a conflict of interest
between partners in his firm and the parent real estate company
for the Heritage Development, he would be abstaining from any
participation in these proceedings.
Thereafter, on motion by Trustee Mendicino, seconded by Trustee
Filipowski, with Trustee 1•-vich abstaining, the following
resolution was adopted:
RESOLVED, that the Public Hearing on the
PUD Regulations be, and it hereby is,
adjourned to the 22nd day of November,
1988 at 8:00 P.M.
At this time, Trustee Mendicino requested that any additional
materials be received before the meetings so the Board would
have sufficient time to review them before the meeting.
3. HERITAGE DEIS (Continued)
4. RYE BROOK NORTH DGEIS (Continued)
These two items are so closely related, they will be treated as
one, Mayor Cresenzi announced.
Fritz Wiedel reiterated some of the issues brought up at the
Octo.-ar 4th hearing and added that approximately 450 acres could
be affected: Blind Brook Country Club, Heritage, Arrowwood,
Royal Executive Park, High Point Hospital, Westchester County
Airport and Cerebral Palsy. These areas are all north of the
Hutchinson River Parkway, Mr. Wiedel noted, adding that PUD is
not a new concept for the Village; it's just being refined and
modified to include housing on these sites.
- 4 -
001 223
October 25, 1988
The property near the airport must be taken under serious
consideration before any homes were built because of the noise
factor which is present in the landing pattern, Mr. Wiedle
stated, adding that the County expressed its objection to any
homes being constructed in that area; they prefer commercial
development.
The Heritage project consists of 12 acres in Rye Brook and 3
acres in Connecticut with approximately 76 units of housing --
single-family homes, Mr. Wiedle submitted.
Mr. Walter Lipman of 3 Mohegan Lane asked when the Board would
make its determination regarding density and Mr. Wiedle
responded that maximum density would be determined when the
Board adopted the revised PUD Zoning Regulations but it was
possible for the Planning Board not to permit the maximum number
of units -- it could be anywhere between 2 units per acre to 6.
When asked by Mr. Lipman if floor area ratio, and lot coverage
regulations would be imposed, Mr. Wiedle answered it would be
approved on a site-by-site basis. Mr. Lipman then suggested
that an overall limitation be established.
Mr. Bernard Klem of the Planning Board asked the Board to be
aware that the DEIS did not place enough emphasis on the
availability of utilities or on tree preservation.
Mayor Cresenzi conveyed that the purpose of these public
hearings was to raise questions that will be answered in the
final document; they may not be answered this evening, but they
will be addressed. The Mayor stated that he would like to see
the noise issue addressed in order to protect any future resi-
dents and he then requested that the letters from the County be
included in the minutes.
Joel Sachs, the attorney for London & Leeds, developers of Royal
Executive Park, announced that he will be coming before the
Board within the next 30 to 60 days for the development of Phase
III.
Mr. Sachs said he was not here tonight to discuss the project
but to make certain comments regarding the DEIS for Heritage and
the DGEIS and he introduced Nat Parish, of Parish & Weiner, who
then proceeded to address the traffic issue and the north-south
road network (connector road) .
- 5 -
0012241
October 25, 1988
Following a lengthy discussion, Mr. Parish suggested that the
final report reflect a range of possibilities (regarding the
growth rate, traffic impact, vehicle count, etc. ) because
additional improvements may be needed with the higher projec-
tions that were made, i.e. , the widening of King Street; or, he
said, why build more if it will not be necessary.
Mr. Sachs then proceeded to explain that the property north of
Anderson Hill Road was projected for office buildings and a
right-of-way, basically in the middle of all properties north of
Anderson Hill Road which would connect with 684, was required
and is shown on the map. Since Royal Executive Park appears to
be the only property owner to proceed with office development,
the connector road would not be necessary, he stated, adding
that before the Board did away with the concept of a connector
road, it had to consider how the other properties would be
developed. If the connector road was done away with, it would
relieve Royal Executive Park of its obligation, Mr. Sachs said,
or else the other developers would have to provide for it.
Ruth Carlucci asked what the rationale was behind increasing the
density in PUD and Mr. Wiedle explained that the traffic impact
would be less with residential housing over commercial because
of the office traffic "peaks" created -- people who live in the
area cause less of an impact because the traffic generated is
staggered. Mr. Wiedle continued that the number "6" was,
essentially, an arbitrary number; it's a good basic number and
it's lower than it was before.
Mr. Klem apprised the audience that Mr. Wiedle was speaking on
behalf of Frederick P. Clark Associates and this was their
recommendation and Mayor Cresenzi added that no decision has
been made to impose this on the entire site.
Mr. Ken Heller said extra police officers would be needed; an
additional firehouse would be necessary; increased need for
ambulance service; additional traffic caused by garbage trucks,
delivery trucks, and service vehicles; and the demand for
utility supplies would be greater.
Mr. Jules Harris commended the Mayor and Board for holding their
peace on these aggressive statements. He added that the
residents should remember that the Board is concerned with the
interests of the community. These people serve as volunteers
and they have the best interest of the community in mind, Mr.
Harris stated, adding that this plan is within the concept of
the Village Master Plan. The proposals offered have a right to
be considered and the developers cannot be stopped from
submitting them or exercising their property rights.
- 6 -
001226
October 25, 1988
Some questions arose regarding whether any proposed shopping
centers would be constructed or if everyone would be using the
Rye Ridge Shopping Center and Mr. Nick Carlucci asked if the
DEIS could address that issue.
Mr. Klem said when the Planning Board begins its serious
discussions of PUD, he intends to recommend allowing for a small
shopping center to service the immediate needs -- something like
an extended general store.
Ruth Carlucci brought up the fact that there is no parking
available at either train station for commuters.
Trustee Filipowski pointed out to the Board that these issues
were discussed in a letter dated September 13, 1982 from the
Westchester County Department of Planning to Fran Nugent. At
that time, the acreage was reduced from 20 to 10 to allow for a
buffer zone and setbacks of 100 feet from streets and 75 feet
from property lines were imposed. Now, Trustee Filipowski said,
the issue was closeness to the airport. The County supported the
rezoning to Hotel because of potential conflicts if residential
use of the site was permitted.
Also pointed out by Trustee Filipowski was the fact that the
acreage count was incorrect in the DGEIS -- there are approxi-
mately 160 acres, not 80 with regard to Blind Brook Country
Club; the Board must be very aware of what is being done.
Another area to be considered, Trustee Filipowski said, was the
need for more attached dwelling units -- Rye Brook is primarily
a one-family residential area! Which is better, asked Trustee
Filipowski, 76 homes or a hotel? What are the benefits? More
variety -- more school enrollment -- greater tax revenue -- he
said he did not know the answers. . .
Mayor Cresenzi said that these issues will be addressed and the
error will be corrected.
Mr. Randy Solomon thanked Trustee Filipowski for his comments as
well as the other residents.
Mayor Cresenzi said he would like to make a change in the 10 day
comment period -- it will be extended to 20 days. So, November
14th will be the deadline date, Deputy Clerk Marra pointed out.
- 7 -
00122b
October 25, 1988
Thereafter, on motion by Trustee Mendicino, seconded by Trustee
Filipowski, with Trustee Ravich abstaining, the following
resolution was adopted:
RESOLVED, that the Public Hearings on
the DEIS for Heritage and the DGEIS for
Rye Brook North, be and they hereby are
cons.-.dered closed; and be it
FURTHER RESOLVED, that the period of
time for written comments be and it
hereby is extended to 20 days, to wit:
November 14, 1988.
Mayor Cresenzi noted it was 10:00 P.M. and recommended a fifteen
minute recess.
At this time, the order of the agenda was slightly changed and
the next item was heard first:
6. CERASO SUBDIVISION - 67 SOUTH RIDGE STREET
Sam Lerner, the applicant's attorney, presented the subdivision
application and explained that the Planning Board recommended
approval with the restriction that certain trees had to remain.
These trees, however, are located in the middle of the lot, Mr.
Lerner mentioned.
Deputy Clerk Marra proceeded to read a letter received in
opposition to the application from Charles and Frances Speruzzi
of 75 South Ridge Street.
Mr. Klem then explained the location of the four trees which
were in question. He said a 26" Maple could be saved if the
house was positioned differently on the lot, but Mr. Lerner said
that it was unfair to impede the placement of a house because of
a tree.
Dorothy Williams, 63 South Ridge Street, asked to see a sketch
of the trees and then inquired what use would be made out of the
lot; to which Mr. Lerner replied one, two-family house would be
constructed.
- s -
October 25, 198
0122)
Mrs. Wilds of 15 Division Street requested that adequate off-
street parking be imposed and Mr. Lerner stated that four
off-street parking spaces would be provided.
The issue of the trees came up again and Mr. Lerner asked if the
Board of Architectural Review could have the final authority on
the one tree, and Mayor Cresenzi said the Village Engineer would
have the final determination.
Mr. Longo, a neighbor adjacent to the property, stated that the
trees hung over his roof and asked if they could be cut down!
Mr. Heller said in the tree preservation law that has not been
reviewed, the trees must be pruned. He added that after the
building permit is given, the trees come down anyway at the
hands of the property owner's chain saw.
Trustee Mendicino did not think it was fair to impose this
because of the size of the property but Mayor Cresenzi explained
that this was a large lot and had certain flexibility.
Attorney Kramer suggested that this restriction run with the
land and be noted on the Subdivision Map.
Mr. Lerner then requested that the Recreation Fee be waived.
Since the Board was opposed to waiving the fee, Attorney Kramer
explained how the figure was arrived at.
Thereafter, on motion by Trustee Ravich, seconded by Trustee
Filipowski, with a unanimous vote of the Board, the following
resolution was adopted:
CERASO SUBDIVISION
67 SOUTH RIDGE STREET
SECTION 1, BLOCK 20, LOT 5
WHEREAS, an Application for Subdivision
Approval was submitted by Thomas Ceraso for
the property located at 67 South Ridge
Street, and known on the Tax Assessment Map
of the Village of Rye Brook as Section 1,
Block 20, Lot 5; and
WHEREAS, on the 23rd day of August, 1988 the
Board of Trustees referred this application
to the Planning Board for their review and
recommendations; and
9 -
001228
October 25, 1988
ll WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held by the
Board of Trustees on October 25, 1988
pursuant to notice and the Board has heard
those members of the public desiring to be
heard thereon;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED, that this Board hereby grants
Subdivision Approval on the above-described
premises located at 67 South Ridge Street;
and be it
FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Mayor be and he
hereby is authorized to sign the Subdivision
Map; and be it
FURTHER RESOLVED, that the developer use his
best efforts to maintain three major existing
trees located on the subdivided lot; and be
it
FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Village Engineer
use his discretion in determining whether one
26" Maple Tree may be removed to allow for
the construction of a new home; and be it
FURTHER RESOLVED, that the requirement that
the trees not be removed willl run with the
land and shall be noted on the Subdivision
Map; and it is
FURTHER RESOLVED, that a Recreation Fee, in
lieu of land, in the amount of $4,900 be paid
before the signing of said Subdivision Map.
5. PROPOSED LOCAL LAW #8-1988 - CODE ENFORCEMENT (Revised)
Mayor Cresenzi explained that the list has been trimmed down to
eliminate the Mayor, Administrator and Auxiliary Police from
being Code Enforcement Officers, and a term of office will be
established at 30 days.
In answer to Shirley Rothenberg's question, Mayor Cresenzi
replied that the Building Inspector is responsible for enforcing
the Village Code and he needs the authority to do it and this
local law would permit him to issue a notice of violation right
on the spot.
- 10 -
00 J - a y
October 25, 1988
Mr.. Ken Heller said he was still opposed to it adding it will
turn Rye Brook into a police state and these people would bs
tres..assing on his property.
These code enforcers will be given training and proper
identification will be issued to them, Mayor Cresenzi said.
Deputy Clerk Marra explained some incidences which have occurred
regarding the new peeper scooper law; this will give the Village
the opportunity to control the situation right there and then.
In instances like that, you cannot issue an appearance ticket
after the fact, she concluded.
Mr. Bill Aughavin stated that the elected officials will be
appointing the officers -- these are the same people who hire
the paid full-time people. He said that he was sure the Mayor
and Administrator would take and use their good judgment. These
people are voted into office and can be voted out, he added.
Following a brief discussion, on motion by Trustee Ravich,
seconded by Trustee Filipowski, with a unanimous vote of the
Board, the following resolution was adopted:
WHEREAS, this Board has met on this date at
the time and place specified in the Notice of
Public Hearing to consider the adoption of a
proposed Local Law and has heard all persons
desiring to be heard;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED, that this Board hereby adopts Local
Law #8-1988 and orders that said law, as so
amended, be herein inserted as a part of the
minutes of this meeting:
VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK
LOCAL LAW #8 - 1988
A Local Law Entitled
CODE !NFORCEMENT OF THE OF RYE BROOK VILLAGE CODE
BE IT ENACTED by the Board of Trustees of the Village of Rye
Brock as follows:
- 11 -
00] 2Ju
October 25, 1988
1. PURPOSE
I
The purpose of this Local Law is to augment who is
specially authorized to issue and serve appearance tickets.
in the enforcement of the Rye Brook Village Code pursuant
to the provisions of the Municipal Home Rule Law.
2. DEFINITION
Appearance Ticket:
A written notice or citation issued and subscribed by a
police officer or other public servant, directing a
designated person to appear in a designated local criminal
court at a designated future time in connection with an
alleged commission of a designated offense.
3. AUTHORIZATION TO ISSUE APPEARANCE TICKETS
Pursuant to Section 150.20 of the Criminal Procedure Law of
the State of New York, the following Village Officials and
Public Servants are hereby authorized to issue appearance
tickets for violations of the Rye Brook Village Code:
A. The Director of Public Works, Building Inspector and
Assistant Building Inspector.
B. The Highway Department Foreman.
C. Temporary, paid or unpaid, Code Enforcement Officers,
for a thirty (30) day renewable term, as appointed by
the Mayor or Village Administrator, to work under the
supervision of the Director of Public Works. Said
temporary Code Enforcement officer(s) to be properly
identified and notification of said appointment(s) to
be posted on the Bulletin Board in the Village Office.
4. SEVERABILITY
If any part of this Local Law shall be adjudged invalid by
any court of competent jurisdiction, such judgment shall
not affect or invalidate the remainder thereof which will
remain in full force and effect.
5. EFFECTIVE DATE
This Local Law shall take effect immediately and thereafter
be filed in the Office of the Secretary of State.
- 12 -
00 123.1.
October 25, 1988
At this time, on motion by Trustee Mendicino, seconded by
Trustee Ravich, with a unanimous vote of the Board, the
following resolution was adopted:
RESOLVED, that the Public Hearings be,
and they hereby are, declared closed.
APPOINTMENTS/AUTHORIZATION
7. CHECK REGISTER AUTHORIZATION
On motion by Trustee Ravich, seconded by Trustee Filipowski,
with a unanimous vote of the Board, the following resolution was
adopted:
CHECK REGISTER
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the following checks,
representing payment for services
rendered, have been submitted to the
Treasurer's Office for payment and have
been certified to by the Village
Administrator:
On-Line Checks #1174 - #1355;
Combined Check Register:
(Hand Checks) #8027 - #8043.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED, that this Board hereby
approves payment of the above-mentioned
claims and authorizes payment thereof.
DISCUSSION
8. NEW YORK-AMERICAN WATER CO. - WATER SUPPLY ADVISORY
Mayor Cresenzi stated that New York-American Water Co. has
announced additional outdoor water use restrictions. Water
users are asked to limit outdoor lawn and garden watering. This
is a preventative measure -- Stage II would call for mandatory
restrictions, he added.
- 13 -
AJC) 1. 232
October 25, 1988
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
9. The Minutes of September 27, 1988, October 04, 1988 and
October 11, 1988 were unanimously approved as presented with.
one minor change being made to page 9 of the September 27th
minutes.
RESOLUTIONS/AGREEMENTS
10. RYE RIDGE SHOPPING CENTER - REQUEST TO USE VILLAGE STREETS
On motion by Trustee Filipowski, seconded by Trustee Ravich,
with a unanimous vote of the Board, the following resolution was
adopted:
RYE RIDGE SHOPPING CENTER
1988 CHRISTMAS PROMOTION
WHEREAS, the Rye Ridge Shopping Center
presented a request to use Village Streets
for the arrival of Santa Claus;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED, that the Rye Ridge Shopping Center
Merchants Association is hereby granted
permission to use the Village streets for a
Holiday Parade to mark the arrival of Santa
Claus by fire truck on Friday, November 25,
1988 at approximately 11:00 A.M.
11. NYS EXECUTIVE DEPT. - DIVISION OF YOUTH PROJECT APPLICATION
On motion by Trustee Mendicino, seconded by Trustee Ravich, with
a unanimous vote of the Board, the following resolution was
adopted:
NEW YORK STATE DIVISION FOR YOUTH
PROJECT APPLICATION
FOR RECREATION FUNDING AND YOUTH SERVICES
RESOLVED, that Salvatore M. Cresenzi, as Chief
Executive Officer of the Village of Rye Brook,
is hereby authorized to affix his signature on
the New York State Executive Department,
Division For Youth, Project Applications for
Recreation Funding and Youth Services for the
Project Year 1989.
- 14 -
00123)
October 25, 1988
12. DESIGNATION OF VILLAGE ELECTION - MARCH 21, 1989
On motion by Trustee Filipowski, seconded by Trustee Ravich,
with a unanimous vote of the Board, the following resolution was.
adopted:
VILLAGE ELECTION
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 15-104 of the
Election Law, the Village Clerk shall, at
least four months prior to the General Village
Election, publish a notice designating the
date of the Village Election, the office(s) to
be filled at such election and the term(s)
thereof;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that this Board
hereby authorizes that the following Public
Notice be posted and also be published in the
Daily Item and in the Westmore News, the
Official Newspapers of the Village of Rye
Brook:
PUBLIC NOTICE
DESIGNATION OF VILLAGE ELECTION
VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the next General
Village Election in the Village of Rye Brook
will be held on March 21, 1989; and
PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that the offices to
be filled are: Trustees (2) each for a two-
year term of office; commencing at 12:00 Noon
on the 3rd day of April, 1989 and concluding
at the end of the official year in 1991.
NOT ON THE AGENDA
Attorney Kramer requested that two items be set for a Public
Hearing for November 22nd. These would be for two proposed
Local Laws; one for Off-Street Parking and the other for Flag
Lots.
On motion by Trustee Ravich, seconded by Trustee Mendicino, with
a unanimous vote of the Board, the following resolutions were
adopted:
- 15 -
00 :! 234
October 25, 1988
PUBLIC HEARING
PROPOSED LOCAL LAW #9 - 1988
OFF-STREET PARKING REGULATIONS
VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK
RESOLVED, that this Board hereby sets Tuesday,
November 22, 1988, at 8:00 P.M. , at the Village
Offices, 90 South Ridge Street, Rye Brook, NY, as
the date, time and place for a Public Hearing to
consider amendments to Section 66-6 of the Rye
Brook Zoning Law by the approval of proposed
Local Law #9 - 1988, entitled Off-Street Parking
Requirements for the Village of Rye Brook; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Deputy Clerk is
hereby authorized to publish the Notice of Public
Hearing in the Official Newspapers of the Village
of Rye Brook.
PUBLIC HEARING
PROPOSED LOCAL LAW #10 - 1988
FLAG/DEEP LOT SUBDIVISIONS
VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK
RESOLVED, that this Board hereby sets Tuesday,
November 22, 1988, at 8:00 P.M. , at the Village
Offices, 90 South Ridge Street, Rye Brook, NY, as
the date, time and place for a Public Hearing to
consider amending Local Law #3-1985, entitled
Land Subdivision Regulations by adopting proposed
Local Law #10-1988, entitled Flag/Deep Lot
Subdivisions for the Village of Rye Brook; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Deputy Clerk is
hereby authorized to publish the Notice of Public
Hearing in the Official Newspapers of the Village
of Rye Brook.
Mayor Cresenzi requested that copies of the proposed Local Laws
to submitted to the Planning Board in plenty of time for their
review and recommendations.
- 16 -
001235
October 25, 1988
13. CARLUCCI SANITATION - BREACH OF CONTRACT/FORFEITURE OF BOND
Attorney Kramer answered Trustee Filipowski' s question by saying.
that no official notice has been given regarding a bankruptcy
petition being filed (by Carlucci Sanitation) .
If the Village is stayed from doing this (retaining the Bond) ,
it will be governed in accordance with the Bankruptcy Law,
Attorney Kramer stated, adding that this (action) is based on
independent findings -- on the investigations held by the
Village and by the County of Westchester. This is a determi-
nation by the Board that this contract has been breached, Mrs.
Kramer concluded.
Thereafter, on motion by Trustee Filipowski, seconded by Trustee
Mendicino, with a unanimous vote of the Board, the following
resolution, as amended, was adopted:
CARLUCCI SANITATION
BREACH OF CONTRACT
WHEREAS, the Village of Rye Brook entered into a
contract with Carlucci Sanitation; and
WHEREAS, the contract provided that Carlucci
Sanitation would charge the municipality for dumping
residential garbage; and
WHEREAS, the contract did not permit Carlucci
Sanitation to charge the Village with dumping fees
for commercial, condominium or other non-Village
garbage; and
WHEREAS, the contract provided for a specific pick-up
schedule; and
WHEREAS, the Village of Rye Brook had reason to
believe that Carlucci Sanitation was dumping such
non-Village garbage and charging the dumping fees to
the Village; and
WHEREAS, the Village caused a private investigation
to be conducted; and
17 -
001236
October 25, 1988
WHEREAS, the private investigator observed Carlucci
Sanitation picking up non-permitted garbage,
including garbage from the Arbors and Village Green
Condo and Lyon Park and Port Chester Fish Market and
numerous other commercial stops which appeared to be
dumped and the dumping fees charged to the Village
account; and
WHEREAS, the Village of Rye Brook requested the
assistance of the District Attorney's office in
investigating the possible fraud; and
WHEREAS, the District Attorney's office also had
trucks of Carlucci Sanitation followed; and
WHEREAS, the District Attorney's office conducted an
independent investigation; and
WHEREAS, the District Attorney reported to the
Village officials that Carlucci Sanitation was
dumping non-Village garbage at the expense of the
Village; and
WHEREAS, the Village initiated a lawsuit against
Carlucci Sanitation for breach of contract, unjust
enrichment and fraud; and
WHEREAS, Carlucci Sanitation has also breached the
contract by not providing trash pick-up on the days
stated; and
WHEREAS, these actions of Carlucci Sanitation are a
breach of its contract with the Village of Rye Brook;
and
WHEREAS, the contract between the Village of Rye
Brook and Carlucci Sanitation provides that Carlucci
deposit the sum of $60,000 as security and that if
the Board of Trustees determines that the contract
has been breached, the Board of Trustees may withdraw
any sum of money on deposit to cure the default in
the contract;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of
Trustees declares that Carlucci Sanitation is in
breach of its contract and the Board of Trustees
directs the Treasurer of the Village of Rye Brook to
remove the $60,000 security fund from the Escrow
Account and put it in the General Fund.
18 -
d0.�.
October 25, 1988 3 j
j NEXT MEETING DATES
REGULAR MEETING - NOVEMBER 22, 1988
REGULAR MEETING - DECEMBER 13, 1988
Mayor Cresenzi announced that there will be no Agenda Meeting on
November 8th as that is Election Day.
ADJOURNMENT
On motion duly made and seconded, it was unanimously resolved
that the meeting be adjourned at 11:40 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
Jean A. Marra
Deputy Village Clerk
16j
19 -