Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1987-04-28 - Board of Trustees Meeting Minutes AGENDA VILLAGE BOARD MEETING 1 APRIL 28, 1987 8 : 00 PM SUBJECT ACTION MINUTES : NI -a 4-61v(1 _ . AGENDA MEETING OF MARCH 10 , 1987 REGULAR MEETING OF MARCH 24 , 1987 ANNUAL REORGANIZATIONAL MEETING OF APRIL 7 , 1987 PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Special Use Permit 62 Bowman Avenue ( Communications Consulting Business q 2. Duties of Village Administrator car 3 . Certification of Building Costs aa` 4. Standards for Fire Lanes 5. Flood Control Law COMMUNICATIONS /. New York State Commission on Cable Television — Re: Order Approving Assignment of Cable TV Franchise to the Village of Rye Brook REPORT �• Review of Part I of Pace University Organizational Study — � U RESOLUTIONS �jl Pe Approval of 1987/88 Budget Calling for Public Hearings to be J � Held May 26th `�i WArchitectural Review Board Structure TRevisions to Vehicle & Trafficw Calling for Public Hearing to be� Held June 23 Revisions to Signe Proc aiming May 1987 Mental y Health Month Appointment of Stan Zak to cable Xrf��st _ c� TV Commission y Consultant Fees re Wyman Street V < Townhouses f� Modification of Betsy Brown _� . t " Subdivision Approval VVVY Y � 1 �G' }, i MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING MEETING OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK, HELD ON THE 28th DAY OF APRIL, 1987 IN THE VILLAGE OFFICES, 90 SOUTH RIDGE STREET RYE BROOK, NEW YORK PRESENT: Mayor Jack L. Kabcenell Trustee Milton Meiskin Trustee Mario Nardi Trustee Salvatore Cresenzi Trustee Francis Filipowski ALSO PRESENT: Attorney Georgia Kramer Treasurer Joseph Cortese Administrator Christopher Russo Clerk Jane Saffir Smith i The Minutes of the meetings held on March 10th, March 24th, and April 7th, 1987 were accepted as presented. -PUBLIC HEARING - APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL USE PERMIT 62 BOWMAN AVENUE - GARY AND ANGELA STROMBERG Mayor Kabcenell stated that a Public Hearing on the Special Use Permit was held on April 23rd, 1985. It was to allow, in accordance with the then-existing zoning, the continuance of a special permitted use on Bowman Avenue. It was now before the Board for a decision as to whether the Special Use Permit would be continued. At that time, since the Board was undertaking the Master Plan for the reconsideration of the entire southern area of Rye Brook, this matter was put on hold and it gave the owner the right to continue the use until the Master Plan was finished and a determination could be made. The Master Plan recommended that no further special permitted uses be allowed on Bowman Avenue. This, however, has been existent. It was indicated to Mr. Stromberg at the time, that this would not necessarily be grandfathered, although it could be. Bruno Gioffre, attorney for applicant, stated that the applicant's business is as a specialist in writing and consulting in the development of communication programs for major corporations in the New York metropolitan area and its environments. The three years that he has been using the property have indicated that there has been no substantial change in traffic or in the appearance of the building and, in fact, it produces less traffic than there would be with a doctor, lawyer or architect who would have people coming and going into the premises. Mayor Kabcenell said he asked the Village Attorney to draw up laws, unrelated to what transpired tonight, so that the Master Plan Study could be implemented, and there will be no further special uses allowed on Bowman Avenue. His other question was whether this special permitted use would run with the land. Should this be permitted, he recommended that the special use be restricted to this owner and this one purpose and not to run with the land for any other purpose in the future. Mr. Gioffre requested that the Board consider permitting the use to stay with the land, simply because the Board has control over a subsequent user. If someone comes in, whether it be this or another building for any use, when the ownership changes he must come back and satisfy the Board because of the special nature of the permit; that his use is not more owners, that the number of people is not different, so that control can be had. Any change of ownership should require a renewal of the permit. On the motion of Trustee Meiskin, seconded by Trustee Nardi, the following resolution was adopted: BE IT RESOLVED that a Special Use Permit for the property known as 62 Bowman Avenue, Rye Brook, New York , is hereby granted with the following limitations and conditions: 1. The property may be used only for a communications consulting business. 2. There shall be no more than five employees or staff. 3. The hours of operation shall be limited to Monday through Friday, from 9 A.M. to 5 P.M. 4. There shall be no structural changes or expansion of the premises. Trustee Meiskin voting AYE Trustee Nardi voting AYE Trustee Cresenzi voting AYE Trustee Filipowski voting AYE Mayor Kabcenell voting AYE a2' PUBLIC HEARING (CONTINUED) DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF VILLAGE ADMINISTRATOR On the motion of Trustee Meiskin, seconded by Trustee Filipowski, the following Local Law was adopted: BE IT ENACTED that Section 1: In order to provide the most economical and efficient overall direction, coordination, and control J of the day-to-day activities of the Village of Rye s Brook, to provide centralized direction and control of Village employees, and to minimize the administration detail now handled by the Mayor and Trustees and free them for proper consideration of policy matters, the position of Village Administrator is hereby established for said Village. Section 2. The Village Administrator shall be appointed by the Board of Trustees and shall remain in the position at the pleasure of the Board of Trustees. The position shall be an unclassified position. Compensation shall be fixed by the Board of Trustees. Section 3. The Village Administrator shall report to and be under the supervision of the Mayor and Trustees. During the absence or disability of the Village Administrator, the Board of Trustees may designate any properly qualified person to perform his duties. Section 4. Subject to the approval, direction and control of the Mayor and Trustees or in those instances where approval, direction and control is, by applicable law reserved to the Mayor, then under the approval, direction and control of the Mayor, and in accordance with such rules and regulations as may be promulgated by the Board of Trustees, the Village Administrator shall: (a) Supervise and coordinate the activities of all Village departments. (b) Oversee and coordinate the work of all Village employees and implement the personnel policies, rules and regulations of the Village. (c) Recommend to the Mayor and Trustees, appointments, promotions or dismissals of all Village employees in accordance with applicable statutes. (d) Represent or supervise the representation of, the Village in collective negotiations with employees. 3 . (e) When so designated by the Mayor, prepare, as Budget Officer, the tentative Budget according to law. (f) Control expenditures within amounts appropriated in the budget by enforcing administrative controls. (g) Report the financial condition of the Village to the Board of Trustees regularly and recommend needed action. (h) Supervise the process of purchasing all materials, supplies and equipment and letting of all contracts. (i) Conduct a continuing study of all activities and functions of the Village with a view to making recommendations from time to time to the Mayor and Trustees of measures and programs that would improve the efficiency and effectiveness of Village government. (j) Maintain liaison with other governments and administrative agencies, but not supplant the Mayor or Trustees as official representatives of the Village. (k) Oversee the response to inquiries by Village residents and other interested persons concerning Village government operations and services. (1) Attend all meetings of the Board of Trustees and provide information relevant to agenda items and questions related thereto. (m) Serve as the public information officer of the Village. (n) Discharge such other duties & responsibilities as may, from time to time, be assigned to him by the Board of Trustees. Section 5. Nothing herein shall be deemed or construed as abolishing, transferring or curtailing any powers or duties of the Mayor or Board of Trustees. Section 6. If any section, subsection or sentence of this Local Law is for any reason held invalid it shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Local Law. All existing locals laws of the Village, and the duties of heads of departments shall remain in full force and effect except insofar as they I conflict with the provisions of this Local Law, in which case the provisions of this Local Law shall prevail. All resolutions or parts of resolutions heretofore adopted or passed by the Board of Trustees conflicting or inconsistent with this Local Law or any part thereof are hereby annulled or repealed. Section 7. This Local Law shall become effective immediately upon filing with the Secretary of State. Trustee Meiskin voting AYE Trustee Nardi voting AYE Trustee Cresenzi voting AYE Trustee Filipowski voting AYE Mayor Kabcenell voting AYE PUBLIC HEARING - CERTIFICATION OF BUILDING COSTS On the motion of Trustee Nardi, seconded by Trustee Filipowski, the following Local Law was adopted: Section 1. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for any structure, the individual or Company seeking the Certificate of Occupancy shall file with the Building Inspector, a certified bill of costs listing all costs of development including but not limited to engineering charges, architectural fees, engineering studies and legal fees, interest and bank charges, site preparation and landscaping costs as well as the cost of labor and construction materials. Section 2. Said bill of costs shall be certified by a licensed engineer or architect in charge of the project. Section 3. If there is no engineer or architect, the individual in charge of construction shall make the certification. Section 4. If the estimated cost listed in the Building Permit was understated, the Building Permit Fee shall be corrected upon receipt of the certified bill of costs. Section S. This Local Law shall take effect immediately upon filing with the Secretary of State. Trustee Meiskin voting AYE Trustee Nardi voting AYE Trustee Cresenzi voting AYE Trustee Filipowski voting AYE Mayor Kabcenell voting AYE PUBLIC HEARING - ESTABLISHING OF FIRE LANES On the motion of Trustee Filipowski, seconded by Trustee Cresenzi, the following Local Law was adopted: BE IT ENACTED that Section 1. Clear, unobstructed roadways shall be maintained in areas established by the Building Inspector and the Fire Chief, or their designated representatives, in areas necessary for access to places of public assembly, structures of public access and office buildings and parking lots of ten (10) or more, and residential subdivisions of ten (10) or more units of housing. Such roadways shall be designated by the Building Inspector and the Fire Chief, or their designated representatives, as Fire Lanes. Section 2. Fire Lanes shall be of two types: Fire Lane "A": Emergency access area, located in the immediate vicinity of structures and fire hydrants for emergency use only. Fire Lane "B": Emergency route, streets, roads or driveways on private property customarily used by emergency apparatus that lead to emergency access areas and fire hydrants. Section 3. Fire Lanes shall be marked in the following manner: Fire Lane "A": Curbs side and top painted traffic yellow. Paved area cross-hatched out four (4) feet from curbs. Cross hatching shall have six (6) inch wide line at 45 degree angle to curb extending outward in the direction of oncoming traffic. Lines shall be two (2) feet apart. Standard NO PARKING FIRE LANE signs shall be placed every fifty (50) feet. They shall be no more than two (2) feet from curb, no lower than six (6) feet and no higher than eight (8) feet from street grade to bottom edge of sign. Signs should be at an angle of 30 degrees to 45 degrees to oncoming traffic where practicable. Fire Lane "B": Designated emergency route - curb side and top shall be painted traffic yellow on side of street leading to structure and Fire Lane "A" . Standard NO PARKING FIRE LANE signs shall be placed every one hundred (100) feet. Signs shall be no lower than six (6) feet and no higher than eight (8) feet from street grade to bottom edge of sign. Section 4. In residential areas designated Fire Lane "B" signs spaced every fifty (50) to seventy-five (75) feet can be substituted for yellow curb, with the approval of the Building Inspector and/or Fire Chief. Section 5. Parking in a Fire Lane shall be a violation of this Local Law and shall be punishable by a fine of not less than fifty dollars ($50) , no more than two hundred fifty dollars ($250) , and/or by imprisonment not to exceed fifteen (15) days. Section 6. Any individual or company who owns or manages a place of public assembly, public access or an office building shall complete the markings required herein within fifteen (15) days of receiving notice of the designated Fire Lanes from the Building Inspector and the Fire Chief, or their designated representatives. Section 7. Any individual or company who owns or manages a place of public assembly, public access or an office building who fails to keep appropriate markers on the designated Fire Lanes shall be guilty of a violation of this Local Law. Said individual or company shall be punishable by a fine of two hundred and fifty dollars ($250) and/or by imprisonment not to exceed fifteen (15) days. Each day on which the Fire Lanes remain unmarked shall be a separate violation. i Section 8. This Local Law shall take effect immediately and shall supersede any conflicting provisions in previously enacted laws. Trustee Meiskin - AYE Trustee Nardi - AYE I Trustee Cresenzi - AYE Trustee Filipowski - AYE Mayor Kabcenell - AYE PUBLIC HEARING - FLOOD CONTROL LAW On the motion of Trustee Meiskin, seconded by Trustee Cresenzi, the following resolution was adopted: RESOLVED that the Public Hearing in connection with Flood Control be adjourned until May 26th 1987. Trustee Meiskin voting AYE Trustee Nardi voting AYE Trustee Cresenzi voting AYE Trustee Filipowski voting AYE Mayor Kabcenell voting AYE r/ ' COMMUNICATIONS NEW YORK STATE COMMISSION ON CABLE TV Mayor Kabcenell stated that this document transfers the Cable TV franchise to the Village of Rye Brook. It has been four years that the Village has been asking them to do this simple process and it has now taken place. This means that now the Village is not only responsible, but is capable of being active in creating the kind of public activities it wants in terms of Cable TV and also, of getting the income from it, which has been put in the budget every year but never received. As of now, when the budget is approved, it will be real. Our thanks goes to former Trustee Zak for his efforts since 1982 to effect this transfer. RESOLUTIONS CABLE TV COMMISSION On the motion of Trustee Meiskin, seconded by Trustee Cresenzi, the following resolution was adopted: i RESOLVED that Stan Zak, of Jennifer Lane, is hereby appointed to the Cable TV Commission. Trustee Meiskin voting AYE Trustee Nardi voting AYE Trustee Cresenzi voting AYE Trustee Filipowski voting AYE Mayor Kabcenell voting AYE I REPORT Mayor Kabcenell stated that he received Part 1 of the Pace University Organizational Study but because the Budget was to be acted on tonight, Pace was asked if they could get us the first section put together which deals with personnel matters. The purpose of this study is to provide the Village with an analysis of current management structures and practices and to make certain recommendations on management, effectiveness and efficiency, and enhance interaction between elected and appointed officials. It will also consider advantages and disadvantages of appointing an administrator or a manager to run the day-to-day operations of the Village. S This group of professionals came and took a look at records, operations, talked to personnel, the Board, heads of departments, members of Boards and Commissions, look at virtually everything the Village has done for the last five years: local laws, the budget, zoning code, tax collection methods, subdivision regulations you name it, they checked it. They considered the geographical nature, the socio-economical nature, they did the demographics, talked about the census, they did a section on the history, which talked about the development of Rye Brook, its formation, etc. , and when i't's all put together, I invite you to read it. From the reports and findings, this section provides an analysis of current management practices and structures and it offers recommendations for their improvement but nothing in it should be construed as criticism. RESOLUTIONS 1987/88 BUDGET APPROVAL Mayor Kabcenell stated that a couple of changes were made in the tentative budget at the Budget Hearing: an increase in Special Franchise Assessments which would produce more income, and a change in the Treasurer's Office in the direction of the recommendation of the Pace Study for more time dedicated to the that office. There was a salary increase for the School Crossing Guards which is reflected under the police. There is no final figure for the Highway Dept. because the contract is still in arbitration. WHEREAS this Board of Trustees has met at the time a place specified in the Notice of Public Hearing on the tentative budget and heard all persons desiring to be heard, And on the motion of Trustee Nardi, seconded by Trustee Filipowski, it is RESOLVED that the tentative budget, as amended and revised, is hereby adopted and that the amounts listed therein for payment of principal and interest on indebtedness and for the salaries and wages of officers and employees, hereby are appropriated for the objects and purposes specified. Trustee Meiskin voting AYE Trustee Nardi voting AYE Trustee Cresenzi voting AYE Trustee Filipowski voting AYE Mayor Kabcenell voting AYE q, The budget as adopted calls for a tax rate of $56.58 per thousand for the year 1987/1988. COLLECTION OF TAXES On the motion of Trustee Cresenzi, seconded by Trustee Filipowski, RESOLVED that the taxes for the fiscal year 1987/1988 be collected as follows: 2/3rds June 1, 1987 1/3rd February 1, 1988 Trustee Meiskin voting AYE Trustee Nardi voting AYE Trustee Cresenzi voting AYE Trustee Filipowski voting AYE Mayor Kabcenell voting AYE _ PUBLICATION OF PUBLIC HEARINGS On the motion of Trustee Meiskin, seconded by Trustee Cresenzi,. BE IT RESOLVED that the Clerk is directed to publish the necessary notices establishing Public Hearings on the following matters, to be held on May 26th 1987 at 8 P.M. : 1. Consideration of amendments to the structure of the Architectural Board of Review. 2. Proposed revisions to the Vehicle & Traffic Law. Trustee Meiskin voting AYE Trustee Nardi voting AYE Trustee Cresenzi voting AYE Trustee Filipowski voting AYE Mayor Kabcenell voting AYE On the motion of Trustee Cresenzi, seconded by Trustee Filipowski, RESOLVED that the Clerk is directed to publish the necessary notice establishing a Public Hearing on proposed revisions to the Sign Law, to be held on June 23rd 1987, at 8 P.M. 10. �i i I Trustee Meiskin voting AYE Trustee Nardi voting AYE Trustee Cresenzi voting AYE Trustee Filipowski voting AYE i Mayor Kabcenell voting AYE I i MODIFICATION OF BETSY BROWN SUBDIVISION APPROVAL. i Mayor Kabcenell stated that this had to do with a restriction which was placed -- that there could be no structure within the flood plain, and a structure now exists there. Attorney Kramer said there were also some field modifications that the developer would like to make, a customer of his requested that there be slight changes in his house as previously approved, and they would like permission from the Board to make those changes. Trustee Cresenzi said if these were exterior changes, the matter would be brought back to the Architectural Review Board. Attorney Kramer stated that the houses were under construction now and a change, such as making something round instead of square, was really very minor, and to go through another two-month process to permit it, didn't seem logical as is was really only a minor field change. Someone wanting to curve a deck rather than having it straight, is the type of change they would like the Board to approve. Trustee Cresenzi stated that he would have a problem approving a change which he has not seen. Mayor Kabcenell suggested establishing a format. Attorney Kramer said we don't really have a provision for allowing minor field changes. Maybe as a result of this we should provide that a committee of the Board of Architectural Review may approve it but, at this moment, there is no mechanism in place for that type of change to be short-circuited; it' s a two-month process. There are two issues here: the first issue is really part of the second; the plans did not show any structure in the flood plain. Stuart Cohen, for the developer, stated that as far as the changes were concerned, they were selling homes from plans, and buyers sometimes couldn't visualize what was being built. He added that they have responded in a discretionary manner and felt the changes didn't violate the intent of what the Review Board' s process was. II. I In discussing it in the field, the Building Inspector has been there, and there has been no serious objection. Some points are being documented and we are filing "as- built" drawings at the end. We haven't done a change to f the form or basic concept of a house; it has been changing the shape of a deck, changing a type of window or adding a window. It is not a practical way to make these changes under the present mechanism, we would have to stop building. Mr. Cohen said that other minor changes have been made and they were filing amended drawings just so they were on file but there are no changes to the footprints. Mark ten Eicken, Assistant Building Inspector, said if changes were made, the developer runs the risk that the the Review Board will not approve the revision. Mayor Kabcenell asked why this matter was before the Board of Trustees, to which Mr. ten Eicken answered because a member of Planning Board noticed that a deck pier was located inside a flood retention basin, and it was ,pointed out that the deck was a different shape from the approved plans, and these changes are commonly taken back to the Review Board. The deck was changed and the pier ended up in the flood plain, Mr. ten Eicken continued, and because of the comments made at the Subdivision Approval meeting about no structures in the flood plain, that' s how the confusion arose. Bernard Klem said he was the Planning Board member who brought this to attention of the Village Board, and he disagreed with Mark in that regard. He did not think that a structural member which is supporting a deck should be in a flood plain, and should not be referred ;to the Review Board; it was not a matter of architecture here; we are talking about structural integrity. The condition of the subdivision approval that the Planning Board recommended and the Village Board approved, was that no structure should be permitted in the flood plain and there is clearly a part of a structure in a flood plain. The water at the last rainstorm was lapping up to the footings which support those two structures and it should be removed to be consistent with the approval given by the Village Board to allow this subdivision to go ahead. Stuart Cohen suggested it be done right since nobody in his organization was looking to violate any approval. There is an issue as to whether or not placing a structure in the flood plain is a contingency of that approval. The resolution states we should conform to the Flood Plain Management Regulations of the Village of Rye Brook. It is in our resolution, and we had to affix a note to our plan. I have built in flood plains, but there are printed regulations as to what happens in a flood plain. Nowhere is it ever printed that "a structure cannot be built in the flood plain." I Trustee Meiskin said he didn't want to get into a debate, because we are doing the same thing from a different perspective. You say you have not violated anything, and yet it seems to me that the agreement you made with the Village to get approval has been violated, he concluded. Stuart Cohen said that this was not a structure. Mayor Kabcenell said we seem to have a little confusion, there has been kind of a generic feeling here that the Board stipulated that there would be no building in the flood plain; Stuart seems to say what was incorporated in it was the regulations. Attorney Kramer stated it was her understanding that there was a resolution that there would be no building in the flood plain. Mark ten Eicken said this particular caveat was not installed, and there has been some confusion for a year and two months. I think you may have some substantiating data, Trustee Meiskin offered, you might want to do it with a subcom- mittee; we can't do it here, because we don't have all the records. Perhaps one or two Board members should sit down with the Building Inspector and the developer and go over the agreement which was reached because all of that is substantial in reaching a final resolution. While it may not have been in the final resolution, it may have been incorporated in a discussion regarding the -final resolution. A local resident, Ken Heller, stated that during the last rainstorm the water was lapping up to the area which was designated as the flood retention area, and allowing anyone to make an exception would then allow the other homeowners to make exceptions and the whole purpose of this flood plain retention was then lost. The builder could cantilever the deck without putting supports in the flood plain. Stuart Cohen said he had to disagree as there are strict regulations as to what can be done in a flood plain, and he referred to these regulations which are accepted everywhere. It is very specific and it is not open to subjective interpretation. Trustee Cresenzi said that it was his understanding, based on the stipulations which were put into the subdivision approval, that there would be no building in the flood plain. 13, One of the examples used that evening was "steel storage sheds." Trustee Cresenzi then asked how far this footing was into the flood plain. Stuart Cohen said he was talking about two 4 x 4 columns; the distance doesn't matter whether it is one foot or forty feet. Trustee Cresenzi stated the restriction was made because the Board didn't want any homeowner doing anything in the flood plain. Mayor Kabcenell said it would seem that the issue was not the posts, but was it the Board's intent that nothing be put in there; if that can be traced down, then the question is why should the Board now waive it related to that. Bernard Klem stated the Village Board is well aware that it can require more stringent regulations and can act accordingly if it so desires. Attorney Kramer said it was her recollection that this caveat was included in the resolution of approval of the subdivision. Mayor Kabcenell believed that the Board should now see if it can validate its feelings that there was a restriction above and beyond what seems to appear in the document. If there was not any place, then we probably have a different kind of issue, so we are going to have to search the documents at this time which would be the various minutes and see if that appears, and then deal with it. Obviously there is still an issue to be dealt _with, but unless we really know that it exists, we are going around in circles. Martin Enowitz, the buyer of the home in question, said one of the things he anticipated doing would be a fence along the brook for safety reasons, because he has two small children. Secondly, he stated he went to contract on the house with the idea at some point of being able to build a pool on the property, and he could understand that there may be some very innocent reasons that some communications have crossed, but he wanted to request that in the documentation of the meeting, he be brought into the loop somehow so that he can know exactly what's going on and what rights he has with the property, so that he can do the right thing for the Village and his expectations as well. If you will stay in contact with the Building Inspector, you can certainly be made part and parcel of these discussions so you will know where you stand, Mayor Kabcenell offered. i Trustee Nardi asked if the restriction would be in the deed so that purchasers know what they are allowed to do or not allowed to do. Mayor Kabcenell said, unrelated to this issue, it seems quite likely that if certain restrictions were put in, the purchaser or a subsequent buyer might not be aware of these restrictions. Attorney Kramer stated that usually restrictions are noted on the subdivision map and when you buy a house they read the title from the subdivision map, so you are aware of easements and restrictions, and the subdivision resolution is public record and you could be made aware of the restrictions. We haven't always said it has to be a deed restriction, but it is part of what they take subject to, because they are easements of record. The subdivision map is part of their record of title and it is usually noted on there. (The tape which was used for the following portion of the meeting was blank. Therefore, the remaining brief summary was compiled from handwritten notes taken at the meeting by the Village Administrator. ) There being no decision reached regarding building in a flood plain, any further discussions on the matter were adjourned to the May meeting. _NOT ON THE AGENDA On motion duly made and seconded, it was unanimously RESOLVED, that Edward Beane be retained in the matter of DeMelia vs. Village of Rye Brook; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, that Mr. Beane be paid for his services at the rate of $125 per hour. WYMAN STREET TOWNHOUSES - CONSULTANTS FEES On motion duly made and seconded, it was unanimously RESOLVED, that Wyman Street Townhouses be required to deposit the sum of $3,000 in an Escrow Account with the Village of Rye Brook to pay for the services of consultants to evaluate the plans and monitor the development of the site; and be it i5. r i FURTHER RESOLVED, that sums will be paid to the consultants from this fend and if there are surplus funds, they shall be refunded to the developer; if additional funds are rea;uired, an additional resolution shall be considered. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to come before the Board at this time, on motion duly made and seconded, it was unanimously resolved that the Beard adjourn into Executive Session to discuss personnel matters. Respectfully submitted, Jean A. Marra 42089 wrJ 87428