Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2014-01-14 - Board of Trustees Meeting Minutes VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK BOARD OF TRUSTEES MEETING VILLAGE HALL, 938 KING STREET TUESDAY, JANUARY 14, 2014 AGENDA 6:45 p.m. —Executive Session: Legal Matters—United Water 7:30 p.m. —Regular Meeting Pledge of Allegiance Report Affordable Housing Public Hearings: 1) Public hearing on proposed amendments to Chapters 8 and 209 of the Village Code 2) Public hearing to consider an application to the Public Service Commission to distribute the cost for infrastructure maintenance and access to be included in United Water rate charges to all customer classes and apportioned among all customers located in the municipality Resolutions: 1) Considering proposed amendments to Chapters 8 and 209 of the Village Code regarding site plan review 2) Considering an application to the Public Service Commission to distribute the cost for infrastructure maintenance and access to be included in the United Water rate charges to all customer classes and apportioned among all customers located in the municipality 3) Considering referring an application for a site plan amendment at property located at 1 International Drive to the Planning Board and Zoning Board of Appeals. 4) Considering referring an application for a special use permit and site plan approval for 561 Westchester Ave. to the Zoning Board of Appeals Board of Trustees Meeting January 14,2014 Page 1 5) Considering setting a public hearing for a proposed local law to amend Chapters 179, 209 and 250 of the Village Code regarding shopping centers Administrator's Report Old Business: Interim report of the site plan approval review task force New Business: Port Chester-Rye Brook Chamber of Commerce Banner Program Discussion Items ACTION ON NON-AGENDA MATTERS SUBJECT TO THE CONSENT OF THE TRUSTEES PRESENT AT THE MEETING THE NEXT SPECIAL AND REGULAR TRUSTEES MEETINGS: January 28 and February 11, 2014 BOARD: Trustee Susan R. Epstein Trustee David M. Heiser Trustee Jason A. Klein Trustee Jeffrey B. Rednick Mayor Paul S. Rosenberg VILLAGE STAFF: Christopher Bradbury, Village Administrator David Burke, Assistant Village Administrator Chief Gregory Austin, Chief of Police Michal Nowak, Superintendent of Public Works Marilyn Timpone-Mohamed, Village Consultant Fred Seifert, IT Mayor Rosenberg welcomed everyone to the first meeting of 2014. He noted that the Board had an executive session before the meeting to discuss legal matters related to United Water. He called for the first matter on the agenda: Public Hearings: Board of Trustees Meeting January 14,2014 Page 2 1) Public hearing on proposed amendments to Chapters 8 and 209 of the Village Code Mayor Rosenberg noted that this matter was touched upon at the prior Board of Trustees meeting. As both he and Mr. Bradbury were absent from that meeting, the public hearing was adjourned to this meeting. Mr. Bradbury noted that there are several pieces of legislation that have been passed or are in the process of being passed in order to make things more streamlined. A lot of the issues that were important at one time, can now be viewed administratively. These amendments to applications that involve more than 50% of the gross floor area may no longer need site plan review. Mayor Rosenberg noted that this Board has been trying to simplify the Code for the residents. He asked Ms. Timpone-Mohamed, Village Consultant, to review some of the triggers and protections that will require site plan review. Ms. Timpone-Mohamed noted that the new rules will apply to applications where the increase in gross floor area does not need specific items. She listed applications that would require site plan review which included erosion control, flood damage prevention, steep slope permit, activities in the wetlands, a special use permit, and work done in the Scenic Roads Overlay District when changes are not visible from the road. Ms. Timpone Mohamed noted that an application to add a partial second floor in the rear of a home, or if there is no foot print change, then there will be no site plan review. If an application requires a variance, then the applicant would need to have a site plan review. If you can live within the boundaries of the Code then there is no need for a site plan review. This is an incentive to follow the Code as it makes the process much faster. It was noted that residents were getting mired in months and months of site plan review. They would be before the Planning Board for a minimum of two months. Mayor Rosenberg noted that there were also changes to the notification process. Ms. Timpone-Mohamed stated that one last change that this local law deals with applications where there is a site disturbance or a change of grade, or slope of the lot. The amendments have to do with storm water management. Mayor Rosenberg called for members of the public wishing to address the Board in connection to these amendments. There being no one, he turned to the Board for comments. Trustee Klein stated that there are existing storm water management systems that are old. If an applicant changes the footprint and adds more than 400 square feet, they would be required to do storm water management. The 400 square feet includes land disturbance. Applications to Board of Trustees Meeting January 14,2014 Page 3 pave a driveway or to add a deck over 400 square feet require of land disturbance would need a storm water management plan. Ms. Timpone-Mohamed noted that there have been times where residents include a storm water management plan when no plan is required as part of their application. On a motion made by Trustee Epstein, and seconded by Trustee Heiser, the public hearing was closed. Mr. David Burke, Assistant Village Administrator, called the roll: Trustee Susan R. Epstein voting aye Trustee David M. Heiser voting aye Trustee Jason A. Klein voting aye Trustee Jeffrey B. Rednick voting aye Mayor Paul S. Rosenberg voting aye Mayor Rosenberg called for the resolution on this matter. RESOLUTION 1) Considering proposed amendments to Chapters 8 and 209 of the Village Code regarding site plan review Mr. Bradbury read the following resolution: RESOLUTION CONSIDERING PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 8 & 209 OF THE VILLAGE CODE REGARDING SITE PLAN REVIEW WHEREAS, the Village of Rye Brook Board of Trustees desires to make certain modifications to the Village Code regarding single family site plan review; and WHEREAS, a proposed local law was introduced to amend Chapter 8 & 209 of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook in this regard; and WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees, pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) determined the proposed action to be an Unlisted Action pursuant to SEQRA; and Board of Trustees Meeting January 14,2014 Page 4 WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees referred the proposed local law to the Planning Board for report and recommendation; and WHEREAS, on December 16, 2013, the Board of Trustees opened a public hearing on the subject local law, at which time all persons interested were given an opportunity to speak on behalf of or in opposition to said local law, and the Board of Trustees closed the public hearing on January 14, 2014. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Trustees hereby adopts the subject local law amending Chapters 8 and 209 of the Village Code regarding site plan review. Mr. Bradbury made an amendment to the resolution-- it should read one and two family and not single family Mayor Rosenberg noted that there are more changes to the Village's Code that are being reviewed. There being no further discussion, he called for a motion on the resolution. On a motion made by Trustee Rednick, and seconded by Trustee Epstein, the resolution was adopted. Mr. Burke called the roll: Trustee Susan R. Epstein voting aye Trustee David M. Heiser voting aye Trustee Jason A. Klein voting nay Trustee Jeffrey B. Rednick voting aye Mayor Paul S. Rosenberg voting aye 2) Public hearing to consider an application to the Public Service Commission to distribute the cost for infrastructure maintenance and access to be included in United Water rate charges to all customer classes and apportioned among all customers located in the municipality Mr. Bradbury reviewed this matter. He noted that legislation was changed last year. The municipality is now allowed to petition that the fees be removed from the municipal budget. The hydrant rental fees for public hydrants will bill all the water rate users for that service. There are some unknown. The Public Service Commission has the right to decide how the funds are billed for this service. Now people pay for this service through their tax bill. It could shift to being included in Board of Trustees Meeting January 14,2014 Page 5 their water bill. In Rye Brook the costs are $160,000.00. There are a lot of layers to this i.e.: how should it be distributed. It will be a major issue for the Village. Mayor Rosenberg asked for a temporary break from the agenda to allow Senator Latimer an opportunity to address the Board. Senator George Latimer addressed the Board. He noted that when the matter of the fire hydrant service was passed by legislation, it was noted that everyone that uses water should billed. He presented the Board with a Legislative Calendar. The State budget will be released this coming week. Capital projects for the Village are addressed and Mr. Bradbury has been very diligent in staying in touch with him. He wanted to be sure that he addresses any issues for Rye Brook. Mayor Rosenberg returned to the agenda and called for a motion to open the second public hearing on the agenda. On a motion made by Trustee Klein, and seconded by Trustee Epstein, the public hearing was declared open. The roll was called: Trustee Susan R. Epstein voting aye Trustee David M. Heiser voting aye Trustee Jason A. Klein voting aye Trustee Jeffrey B. Rednick voting aye Mayor Paul S. Rosenberg voting aye The representative for United Robert, Robert Idoni, address the Board. This public hearing is the first step in the process. United Water had no involvement with this bill. In general the bill offers the option of charging certain water related charges now billed to municipalities switched over to the residents. United Water is looking to the PFC to set the rate before information on how the rate changes will specifically effect homeowners. Fire Hydrants are installed by United Water. Some of the most important parts of the hydrants are located below ground. There must be enough pressure and water capacity to fight a fire. United Water charges a fee. An Official Fire suppression system is important. United Water pays franchise fees and taxes to the municipalities. As a result of the new legislation savings are passed on to the tax payers, but the hydrant fees will now be billed to the residents. Mayor Rosenberg called for members of the public who wished to speak on this topic. There was no one. Mr. Bradbury noted that two letters submitted letters in opposition. Board of Trustees Meeting January 14,2014 Page 6 Trustee Rednick felt that it was fair for all users in the community to contribute to the costs of the fire hydrants. Trustee Heiser noted that he was against this change. Mayor Rosenberg felt that this resolution should be passed. He understands the benefit to the Village; but he did not have enough clarity regarding how this will be handled and would want more information prior to passing this. Trustee Epstein also felt that it was pre-mature to make a decision. Trustee Klein agreed as there is an uncertainty of how this would effect residents. Mr. Bradbury noted that the public hearing could be closed, and no resolution should be addressed or the public hearing could be set for a date in February. He also noted that the Public Service Commission needs a response by March. The decision was to adjourn the public hearing to February 25 2014. On a motion made by Trustee Epstein, and seconded by Trustee Klein, the public hearing was adjourned to February 25, 2014. The roll was called: Trustee Susan R. Epstein voting aye Trustee David M. Heiser voting aye Trustee Jason A. Klein voting aye Trustee Jeffrey B. Rednick voting aye Mayor Paul S. Rosenberg voting aye Mayor Rosenberg called for resolution#3 on the agenda: 3) Considering referring an application for a site plan amendment at property located at 1 International Drive to the Planning Board and Zoning Board of Appeals. Mr. Bradbury made a change to the resolution, and then read the following: RESOLUTION CONSIDERING REFERRING AN APPLICATION FOR A SITE PLAN AMENDMENT AT PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1 INTERNATIONAL DRIVE TO THE VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK PLANNING BOARD Board of Trustees Meeting January 14,2014 Page 7 AND ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS WHEREAS, American Signcrafters ("Applicant") submitted an application on behalf of property owner Reckson Operating Partnership, LP, for a Site Plan Amendment for the installation of a freestanding monument sign, along with installation of two building wall signs and replacement of lettering on existing stone monument signs at the intersection of International Drive and King Street, at Reckson Executive Park on property located at 1 International Drive, designated as Section 124.82, Block 1, Lot 1 and Section 124.8 1, Block 1, Lot 1 on the Town of Rye Tax Map and located in the OB-1 Zoning District and Scenic Roads Overlay District; and WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees is the Approval Authority for the application in accordance with Sections 209-1(A)(1) of the Village Code; and WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees, pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) determines the proposed action to be an Unlisted Action pursuant to SEQRA which will undergo and uncoordinated review; and WHEREAS, the Building Inspector's Zoning Analysis, dated December 23, 2013 identifies the following variances as being necessary for the proposed site plan: 1. §250 Attachment 2:1. The maximum allowable number of wall signs is one. The applicant is proposing two wall signs. Therefore, a variance for one additional wall sign is required. 2. §250 Attachment 2:1.g. The maximum allowable size for a wall sign is 30 sq. ft. The applicant is proposing to install two wall signs each measuring 58.43 sq. ft. Therefore, each sign will require a variance of 28.43 sq. ft. 3. §250-35.D(4) The maximum total permitted sign area for a lot or business is 200%. The cumulative percentage of all existing and proposed signs on this lot is 565%. Therefore, a maximum total permitted sign area variance of 365% is required. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Trustees hereby refers the application for approval of a Site Plan Amendment to the Planning Board for Report and Recommendation. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Trustees hereby refers the application for the proposed site plan to the Zoning Board of Appeals for consideration of all necessary variances. Board of Trustees Meeting January 14,2014 Page 8 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the application shall be heard by the Planning Board first, then by the Zoning Board of Appeals, before returning to the Board of Trustees for the purpose of scheduling a public hearing. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Trustees directs that, pursuant to General Municipal Law §239-m and Westchester County Administrative Code §277.61, the application shall be referred to Westchester County Department of Planning for comment no less than 30 days prior to the public hearing concerning the application, and directs that pursuant to General Municipal Law §239-nn and Westchester County Administrative Code §277.71, notice of public hearing shall be sent to the Town of Greenwich no less than 10 days prior to the public hearing concerning the application. Mr. Bradbury made a change He noted that the application has been referred to the Planning Board and the Zoning Board of Appeals. The application shall be heard by the Board of Trustees Mr. Lance Macchio, with American Sign Crafters noted that he was available to address the Board. He noted that the bottom line was that Zline has moved their Corporate headquarters from White Plains to Rye Brook. They would like to do some modest branding on the building. Mayor Rosenberg noted that this was a referral to the Zoning and Planning Board. The monument sign has triggered site plan review, and the need to have this application referred to the Planning Board. The applicant is aware of this, but would like to proceed with the application which is currently before the Board. On a motion made by Trustee Heiser, and seconded by Trustee Klein, the resolution was adopted. Trustee Susan R. Epstein voting aye Trustee David M. Heiser voting aye Trustee Jason A. Klein voting aye Trustee Jeffrey B. Rednick voting aye Mayor Paul S. Rosenberg voting aye 4) Considering referring an application for a special use permit and site plan approval for 561 Westchester Avenue to the Zoning Board of Appeals. Mr. Bradbury read the following resolution: RESOLUTION Board of Trustees Meeting January 14,2014 Page 9 CONSIDERING REFERRING AN APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT AND SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR 561 WESTCHESTER AVENUE TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS WHEREAS, RRC/LCS, Inc. ("Applicant") has made an application to the Village of Rye Brook for approval of a Special Use Permit and Site Plan to legalize an existing professional office and two (2) residential apartments on property located in the R-217 Zoning District at 561 Westchester Avenue, Section 135.83, Block 1, Lot 11 on the Town of Rye Tax Assessor's Map; and WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees is the Approval Authority for the application in accordance with Sections 209-1(A)(1) and 250-6(H)(1)(c) of the Village Code; and WHEREAS, on August 19, 2013 the Board of Trustees classified the proposed action as an Unlisted Action pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act ("SEQRA"); and WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees referred the application to the Planning Board of the Village of Rye Brook on August 19, 2013 for report and recommendation and the Planning Board issued its report and recommendation on January 9, 2014; and WHEREAS, the Building Inspector's memorandum to the Planning Board, dated December 27, 2013 identifies the following variances as being necessary for the proposed site plan: 4. §250-25.L.(2)(a). Floor Space. The Rye Brook Code states that the minimum required apartment size for any two-family conversion is 750 sq. ft. per family to be housed. The applicant proposes to legalize the existing 714 sq. ft. second-floor apartment. Therefore, an area variance of 36 sq. ft. is needed. 5. §250-25.L.(2)(c). Rear Service Access. The Rye Brook Code mandates that service access from the rear yard of the building is required for each apartment. The applicant proposes to legalize the second-floor apartment without having or providing such access. Therefore, a variance from §250-25.L.(2)(c) is required. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that for the reasons stated herein, the Board of Trustees hereby refers the application listed herein to the Zoning Board of Appeals for a determination on the required variances. Mayor Rosenberg noted that this application will be referred to the Zoning Board of Appeals. As a special use permit is being requested, this matter will be back before the Board of Trustees. Board of Trustees Meeting January 14,2014 Page 10 On a motion made by Trustee Klein, and seconded by Trustee Epstein, the resolution was adopted. The roll was called: Trustee Susan R. Epstein voting aye Trustee David M. Heiser voting aye Trustee Jason A. Klein voting aye Trustee Jeffrey B. Rednick voting aye Mayor Paul S. Rosenberg voting aye 3) Considering setting a public hearing for a proposed local law to amend Chapters 179, 209, and 250 of the Village Code regarding the shopping center. Mr. Bradbury read the following resolution: RESOLUTION SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING FOR A PROPOSED LOCAL LAW TO AMEND CHAPTERS 179, 209 AND 250 OF THE VILLAGE CODE REGARDING SHOPPING CENTERS WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees of the Village of Rye Brook has proposed a local law to modify certain Chapters of the Village of Rye Brook Code regarding changes of use in existing shopping centers; and WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees of the Village of Rye Brook has determined that the proposed action is an Unlisted Action, pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act ("SEQRA"), and shall be subject to an uncoordinated review; and WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees of the Village of Rye Brook referred the proposed local law to the Westchester County Department of Planning on December 30, 2013 for the County's review and comment thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Trustees of the Village of Rye Brook shall hold a public hearing on January 28, 2014 at 7:30p.m. at Board of Trustees Meeting January 14,2014 Page 11 Village Hall, 938 King Street, Rye Brook, New York, to consider the proposed local law; and FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Trustees directs that, pursuant to General Municipal Law §239-nn and the Westchester County Administrative Code, notice of the public hearing on the proposed local law shall be sent to the City of Rye, the Town/Village of Harrison, the Village of Port Chester and the Port Chester-Rye Union Free School District no less than 10 days prior to the public hearing. Mayor Rosenberg noted that this resolution was another attempt at simplifying the Village's Code. Earlier the Board discussed simplifying the Code for residents and this resolution deals with commercial properties. Ms. Timpone Mohamed, Village Consultant, gave a brief overview. The changes that will be made to these chapters of the Village's Code relate to changes of use in the shopping centers. Changes of use happen when one store moves out and another one moves in. Currently any changes must go through a full site plan review. The intent is to simplify and streamline the process. Most of the applications for the two shopping centers in Rye Brook will be reviewed by the Planning Board. There are triggers for the applications that would require an application to come before the Board of Trustees. Ms. Timpone Mohamed reviewed the triggers for site plan review which include changers to the gross floor area of the building, the need for a Special Use Permit, a change of hours outside the range of retail hours. Everything short of these triggers will be in the hands of the Planning Board unless exempted by the Board of Trustee and Planning Board. If there is no alteration to the footprint of the building and it has usual hours of operations, and does not need a variance for a Special Permit, for a change of use or minor site changes would be handled by the Planning Board. The review process is being changed. Mayor Rosenberg noted that there is nothing being taken away from the Code in terms of storm water. There will be a public hearing on this matter. If there is a major change to the shopping center then the Board of Trustees will retain the final approval authority. Village counsel explained the ability to waive approval authority. The goal is to handle the applications from the shopping centers administratively. Ms. Timpone Mohamed noted that parking can be looked at if there has been a lot changes within the shopping center over a number of years. The Planning Board suggested two years. The Village and Traffic consultant was not comfortable with two years. Parking counts are done when changes are made, but if in two years five stores have changed then parking studies should be done. However, if no changes have been made in five years, then no studies would be needed. So the review could be after one year or three years; which the counts are up. The Village Planner, Consultant and Village Engineer will review parking. Board of Trustees Meeting January 14,2014 Page 12 Mayor Rosenberg noted that this resolution was just a public hearing and the matter will be reviewed by the Board of Trustees again in two weeks. Craig Samson of Win Ridge addressed the Board. He thanked the Board for the positive steps being taken. On a motion made by Trustee Heiser, and seconded by Trustee Epstein, the resolution was adopted. Trustee Susan R. Epstein voting aye Trustee David M. Heiser voting aye Trustee Jason A. Klein voting aye Trustee Jeffrey B. Rednick voting aye Mayor Paul S. Rosenberg voting aye ADMINISTRATRATOR'S REPORT: Mr. Bradbury noted that the Village is working on the comprehensive plan. Eight chapters have been drafted and the third public workshop was just held. Residents are encouraged to give their input. Residents in learning more about this subject can find information on the Village's website. There is still a lot of work to be done. Mr. Bradbury noted that the Public Works Department is still collecting Christmas Trees. Another issue discussed by Mr. Bradbury was potholes. The Village is aware of the pot holes, and he noted that there were some deep potholes on King Street. If you have damage from a pothole call the Village and you will be directed as to where to make a claim. Mr. Bradbury noted that with the cold weather, there has been a lot of de-icing at the airport. There is a distinct order that comes from the de-icing fluid. The County assured the Village that the release of de-icing fluid is being overseen. The fluid has an offense order. It smells like a gas leak. The Village has reached out to the County to see if there is a different product that is equally effective that did not have the order that could be used. Residents are very concerned and the Village has received many calls on this issue. The County is looking into this matter. Board of Trustees Meeting January 14,2014 Page 13 OLD BUSINESS: 1) Interim report of the site plan approval review task force Mayor Rosenberg noted that there are several ways that the Board is trying to streamline the process. Some of the changes have to do with site plan review. The Board needs to hear what this will do to the Code. Ms. Timpone Mohamed summarized this issue. The issue that the Task Force is looking at is the approval process. It was decided to look at this matter to reduce the cost of land use application review, streamline the process, and ensure that the Code includes clear guidelines for reviews. The Task Force decided to review the Code and the process. The Planning Board received approval authority in 2005 and they have provided recommendations to the Board of Trustees. Over time the some of the regulations have been made stronger and improved. These amendments will give the Board of Trustees more time to deal with larger issues of the Village. The Planning Board was asked by the Board of Trustees to review proposed code changes related to streamlining the site plan review process. They had certain concerns, and gave recommendations back to the Trustees. The report by the Task Force summarized the changes. It was noted that P.U.D.s have been addressed as have minor subdivisions, and changes to the Code for disturbance under a certain number. It has been recommended that applications for Special Permits to operate professional offices along Westchester and Bowman Avenue be transferred to the jurisdiction of the Planning Board. Also considered were site plan reviews for subdivisions, along with SEQRA review. Reviews will be able to be done in a more timely manner. The Task Force agreed with the approval authority structures made by the Planning Board and then made eight recommendations of their own. Ms. Timpone-Mohamed reviewed the eight recommendations for the Board. Mayor Rosenberg felt that the original submission of a site plan for a P.U.D. should be left to the Board of Trustees given the importance of the creation of a P.U.D. The next step is to have Keane & Beane review the report. This is a major undertaking; a major change. If things are on-track then the next step can be taken. Mayor Rosenberg noted that this will go along way to streamline the process in that it will shorten the process. He noted that he looked forward to seeing a draft. Board of Trustees Meeting January 14,2014 Page 14 Trustee Heiser noted that one of the benefits of the process is greater communications between the two Boards. A joint meeting between the Board of Trustees and the Planning Board will go along way to speed up the applications. Trustee Rednick stated that this is one giant step. NEW BUSINESS: 1) Port Chester — Rye Brook Chamber of Commerce Banner Program Mr. Bradbury gave a little background on this issue. The Village was asked if they are interested in doing something in the Village similar to what is done in Port Chester regarding advertising banners located on light poles. The Village has a lot of say in terms of what the banners will look at. The fee to the advertiser is $400 for one banner for one year, and the Chamber of Commerce does the work to sign up advertisers. The Village would be responsible for putting up and maintaining these banners. The upper part of the banner will include a welcome to Rye Brook greeting. Mayor Rosenberg noted that his personal feeling was that these banners do not fit within the character of Rye Brook. The Village supports the Chamber of Commerce and, therefore, the Comprehensive Plan Committee will review this issue. Mayor Rosenberg called for members of the public wishing to address the Board. There being no one, he noted that the next Trustees meetings are scheduled for January 28th and February 11th. He called for a motion to adjourn the meeting. On a motion made by Trustee Heiser, and seconded by Trustee Epstein, the meeting was adjourned at 9:13 p.m. Mr. Burke called the roll: Trustee Susan R. Epstein voting aye Trustee David M. Heiser voting aye Trustee Jason A. Klein voting aye Trustee Jeffrey B. Rednick voting aye Mayor Paul S. Rosenberg voting aye Board of Trustees Meeting January 14,2014 Page 15