Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Kingfield Site Plan Amendment Approval 2025-12-11
RECEIVED December 11, 2025 APPROVED 6-0-1 DEC 17 2025 VILLAGE CLERK'S OMCE VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK PLANNING BOARD RESOLUTION PB 25-004 GRANTING AMENDED PUD SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR KINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS,the Kingfield Lot Owners Association,Inc. (the"Applicant"),submitted an application to the Village of Rye Brook Planning Board ("Planning Board' for approval of an amendment to a Planned Unit Development Site Plan (hereafter, the "Amended PUD Site Plan") concerning the proposed swap and/or trade of 4,835 square feet of unused impervious surface coverage from the common area to homeowners for use in connection with their patios, decks, walkways, or other impervious surfaces situated at the Kingfield residential development (the "Kingfield Development") at property formally known as Section: 129.25,Block: 1, Lot: 1, on the Town of Rye Tax Map, in the PUD Zoning District (the"Property");and WHEREAS, the Village Board of Trustees was the Approval Authority for the initial PUD Concept Plan and PUD Site Plan for the Kingfield Development (then known as Sun Homes) in accordance with Sections 209-1(A)(1) and 250-7.E(4)(b) of the Village Code;and WHEREAS, on February 23, 2016, the Village Board of Trustees approved a PUD Site Plan for the Kingfield Development which was subsequently amended on October 30, 2017;and WHEREAS, on January 10, 2017, the Village Board of Trustees approved a PUD Subdivision application which was subsequently amended on February 13,2018; and WHEREAS, prior to approval of the PUD Concept Plan, PUD Site Plan and PUD Subdivision, the Board of Trustees adopted a Negative Declaration pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act ("SEQRA") finding the Project would not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts; and WHEREAS, as relevant to this application, the January 10, 2017 PUD Subdivision Resolution contained the following condition: A note shall be added to the plat which permits no more than 11,000 square feet of additional impervious surface coverage to be added to the common area,subject to approvals by the Village of Rye Brook, beyond that permitted pursuant to the PUD Site Plan approved by the Board of Trustees on February 23, 2016, or any amended version thereof approved by the Village,without further review by the Village and possible modification of the stormwater management system. Also, consistent with the 1313/464/4900-1742-7532v2 12116125 applicant's representations during the Village's review of the subdivision application, the note added to the subdivision plat shall also state that no expansions,additions,decks,walkways,or other additional impervious surface coverage shall be permitted on the 110 individual residential lots other than what is shown on the PUD Site Plan approved by the Board of Trustees on February 23, 2016 or any amended version thereof approved by the Village;and WHEREAS, as relevant to this application, the February 13, 2018 Amended PUD Subdivision Resolution contained the following conditions: Based on prior reviews by the Village's Consulting Engineer, Dolph Rotfeld Engineering, P.C. for the original PUD Site Plan and Subdivision approvals, the applicable stormwater management facilities were sized to allow an additional 11,000 square feet of impervious surface coverage on the Property before modifications to the stormwater management facilities would be necessary. According to the Applicant, the Amended PUD Site Plan approved by the Board of Trustees on October 30, 2017, adds approximately 6,165 square feet of impervious surface coverage to the Property. As a condition of that approval, the Applicant is required to provide written verification of its calculations to confirm that 4,835 square feet of impervious surface coverage remains available. Prior to the signing of the Final Plat by the Mayor, the Applicant shall provide written verification of its calculations to confirm that 4,835 square feet of impervious surface coverage remains available. Prior to the signing of the Final Plat by the Mayor,the notes on the Plat shall be revised to state as follows: No more than 4,835 square feet of additional impervious surface coverage may be added to the common area shown on this subdivision plat beyond what is shown on the Amended PUD Site Plan, approved by Resolution of the Village Board of Trustees on October 30, 2017, without further review by the Village of Rye Brook. No expansions or additions, decks, walkways or other additional impervious surface coverage shall be permitted on the 110 individual residential lots other than what is shown on the Amended PUD Site Plan approved by Resolution of the Board of Trustees on October 30, 2017; and 1313146414900-1742-7532v2 12116125 -2- WHEREAS, the above-referenced notes are set forth on the "Subdivision Map of Kingfield,"prepared by Link Land Surveyors,P.C.,dated June 29,2018,filed in the Office of the Westchester County Clerk on August 28,2018 as Filed Map No. 29210;and WHEREAS, as relevant to this application, the October 17, 2017 Amended PUD Site Plan Resolution contained the following condition: The Applicant shall cooperate with the Village in developing guidelines for future renovations,home expansions or additions to ensure that no more than 4,835 square feet of additional impervious surface coverage is added to the site without further review and possible modification of the stormwater management system. WHEREAS, following these approvals at-grade patios,walkways and other additional impervious surface coverages were constructed at individual residential lots beyond that shown on the Amended PUD Site Plan approved by Resolution of the Board of Trustees on October 30,2017;and WHEREAS, the Applicant now proposes to allow these improvements to remain by utilizing the excess 4,835 square feet of additional impervious surface coverage that was originally allotted for the residential development's common areas;and WHEREAS, according to the Applicant's professional engineering consultant, the total impervious surface coverage constructed at individual residential lots beyond that which was shown on the approved October 30,2017 PUD Site Plan is 3,613 square feet which leaves 1,222 square feet of impervious surface coverage available before the stormwater management facilities reach its design capacity;and WHEREAS, pursuant to Village Code § 250-7(E)(3)(c), the Planning Board is the approval authority for amendments to approved PUD Site Plans, and as such is the approval authority for this application;and WHEREAS, the Planning Board reviewed the following plans and application matcnals: 1. Application for Amended Site Plan Approval; 2. Short Environmental Assessment Form and EAF Mapper; 3. Letter from Steven Fews,Building Inspector, dated April 15,2025; 4. Letter from David B. Gelfarb,Esq., Counsel for the Kingfield Homeowners Association, dated April 14, 2025; 5. Letter from Langan Engineering; dated March 28,2025; 6. The following set of plans,generally entitled "Site Plan Amendment"prepared by Langan Engineering,Environmental Surveying,landscape Architecture and Geology,DPC, last revised May 5,2025: 1313/464/4900-1742-7532v2 12116125 -3- a. Sheet CS-100 "Site Plan Amendment" b. Sheet CS-101, "Site Plan Amendment: Enlargement (1 of 2); c. Sheet CS-102, "Site Plan Amendment: Enlargement (2 of 2); 7. Hardesty& Hanover Memorandum, dated May 2,2025; 8. Letter from David B. Gelfarb,Esq.,Counsel for the Kingfield Homeowners Association, dated August 25,2025; 9. Letter from David B. Gelfarb,Esq., Counsel for the Kingfield Homeowners Association, dated September 2, 2025; 10.Letter from David B. Gelfarb,Esq.,Counsel for the Kingfield Homeowners Association, dated December 1,2025; and WHEREAS, the application is a Type II Action pursuant to 6 NYCRR 617.5(c)(12) of the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) thereby requiring no further environmental review;and WHEREAS,the Planning Board reviewed the application at its meetings held on May 8,2025,June 12, 2025,July 10,2025,and December 11, 2025;and WHEREAS,a duly advertised public hearing was opened on June 12,2025, at which time all those wishing to be heard on the Application were given such opportunity, and the public hearing was continued to July 10,2025 and thereafter to August 14,2025,at which time the public hearing was adjourned month to month until December 11, 2025 when the public hearing was closed; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board,Village Planning Consultant, and Village staff have reviewed all application materials and made recommendations;and WHEREAS, the Planning Board has considered the applicable requirements of Chapters 209 and 250 of the Village Code,including those set forth at§ 209-1(A)(2) and 250- 7(E)(4)(c), and; WHEREAS, the Planning Board is familiar with the property and all aspects of the project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Village of Rye Brook Planning Board hereby GRANTS the Amended Site Plan to allow the 4,835 square feet of impervious surface coverage previously allocated for use on the Kingfield common areas to be used on individual residential lots at the Kingfield residential development, upon the following conditions: 1. No more than 1,222 square feet of additional impervious surface coverage (4,835 square feet beyond what is shown on the approved October 17,2017 Amended PUD Site Plan) may be added to the common areas and individual residential lots without further review by the Village of Rye Brook as to the adequacy of the stormwater facilities. Construction of additional impervious surface coverage on common areas 1313/46414900-1742-7532v1 12116125 -4- or individual residential lots may be subject to the issuance of a building permit and architectural review by the Village of Rye Brook based on the Village Code in effect at the time such permits and approvals are sought,in addition to any requirements of the Kingfield HOA. 2. The Applicant shall submit to the Superintendent of Public Works/Village Engineer and the Building Inspector an annual report prepared by a licensed professional engineer which identifies the amount of impervious surface coverage installed on the individual residential lots and common areas of the Kingfield community over the course of the prior year. In the event the Applicant seeks an amount of impervious surface coverage that exceeds the design capacity of the stormwater facilities developed for the Kingfield community the Applicant shall submit an application to the Village to improve the stormwater facilities. The first report to the Superintendent of Public Works/Village Engineer and Building Inspector shall be due on or before December 31,2026. 3. The approval granted herein to allow the 4,835 square feet of impervious surface coverage to be utilized by the individual residential lots rather than only the common area does not eliminate the requirement that the individual lot owners apply for and receive all required permits from the Village Building Department. These permits are in addition to any review that may be required by the Kingfield HOA. 4. The individual lot owners shall promptly legalize all existing impervious surface coverage that exceeds what is shown on the 2017 Amended PUD Site Plan, and was constructed without permits,by securing all required permits from the Village Building Department. 5. An as-built survey shall be submitted to the Village Building Department for each individual residential lot that contains impervious surface coverage that differs from what is shown on the 2017 Amended PUD Site Plan or the plans entitled "Site Plan Amendment"prepared by Langan Engineering, Environmental Surveying, Landscape Architecture and Geology,DPC,last revised May 5,2025. 6. The Applicant shall prepare and submit to the Village Attorney for review as to form a Declaration which amends the first"Village/Town Notes" set forth on the "Subdivision Map of Kingfield,"prepared by Link Land Surveyors,P.C.,dated June 29, 2018,filed in the Office of the Westchester County Clerk on August 28,2018 as Filed Map No. 29210, as follows, "No more than 4,835 square feet of impervious surface coverage may be added beyond what is shown on the Amended PUD Site Plan, approved by Resolution of the Village Board of Trustees on October 30,2017,without further review by the Village of Rye Brook," and eliminates the second"Village/Town Notes"which states,"No expansions or additions,decks,walkways or other additional impervious surface coverage shall be permitted on the 110 individual residential lots other than what is shown on the Amended PUD Site Plan approved by Resolution of 1313/464/4900-1742-7532v2 12116125 -5- the Board of Trustees on October 30,2017."The Declaration shall be recorded by the Applicant in the Westchester County Clerk's Office and a copy of the recorded document shall be submitted to the Village of Rye Brook Planning Board Secretary. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED,that no permits shall be issued until the Applicant has paid to the Village all applicable fees and professional review fees incurred in connection with review of this Application. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, during construction, the Village Building Inspector or Superintendent of Public Works/Village Engineer may authorize, upon the written request of the applicant, minor changes to the approved site plan. Such minor modifications shall be consistent with the design and intent of the approved site plan. The architect or engineer of record shall submit the approved change(s) on a set of as-built plans, which plans shall be maintained in the permanent file of the Building Department.All changes to the site plan, other than minor changes described herein, shall require approval of a site plan amendment by the Planning Board. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED,all construction shall be performed in accordance with all approved plans and land use approvals, any approved amendments thereto and field changes authorized and approved by the Building Inspector, the Superintendent of Public Works/ Village Engineer, or their designee, in writing. Any applicant who violates this Resolution may be issued a stop work order and summons in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 91 of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook. On motion by Mr. Teig, seconded by Ms. Schoen, Superintendent of Public Works/Village Engineer, called the roll: MR. BRANCH Voting Abstain MR. GRZAN Voting Aye MR. MENDELSOHN Voting Aye MS. SCHOEN Voting Aye MR. TEIG Voting Aye MR.VAISMAN Voting Aye CHAIRMAN GOODMAN Voting Aye 13131464/4900-1742-7532v2 12116125 -6- C =2 , BUILDING DEPARTMENT Q VILLAGE OF RY)E BROOK ' 938 KING STjmET RYE BROOK,NY 1057 3APR 15 2025 Ir" (914)�39-0668' "�w.rvgbrooknv.gov VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK BUILDING DEPARTMENT #######k###t#####tt####t#############k###k#tt###############k###t##ttkk##t##t###t#t#tt######t##tk#####tt#t# FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: n / BOT Approval Date: PB Approval Date: �pC/ I I J�z OC2 5 BOT Disapproval Date: PB Disapproval Date: Attach Resolution Hereto: BOT I LBA ] M _ Chairman: SITE PLAN FEE: �-9,AA a» DATE PAID: ENVIRONMENTAy FEE: DATE PAID: OTHER: ti GCP"o (2 Cl #####t#t####t#k#t###t#k##k#####t##kkt#t#####t####tk#kt####t##t#t#t#tttttttttt#tttktktttktktt#tttktttttttt## APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL Submission of this application does not assure placement on any Planning Board Agenda.The Applicant will be notified of such placement. tkktt#*tt*tt#t#tt*ttkkk#t#tttt###*tt##k*kt#ttk**t#*tt#k#**#*t#ttt#t*ttt#*tttttt#tttt#t#**t#t##t#tt*t*#t###* This application references but is not limited to the following sections of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook;§250 ZONING,§209 SITE PLAN REVIEW,§235 TREES,§107 DEMOLITION OF BUILDINGS,§224 SWIMMING POOLS,§121 EXCAVATION&TOPSOIL REMOVAL,§118 EROSION&SEDIMENT CONTROL,§213 STEEP SLOPES PROTECTION,§219 SUBDIVISION OF LAND, §250-40 NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS. Applicants and their Design Professionals are strongly advised to review the above mentioned code sections online at,www.ryebrookny_gov prior to completing and/or submitting this application. APPLICATION FEE SCHEDULE: Residential Dwellings- $325.00,plus$200.00 per additional dwelling unit. Non-Residential Buildings- $475.00,plus $30.00 per parking space. Planned Unit Development-$600.00,per acre PUD Amendment- $600.00 Site Plan Amendment- $575.00 Wetlands&Watercourse- $1,150.00,permit$250.00 Consultant Review(Escrow)Fee: Minimum fee$250.00-maximum fee$2,500.00 to be determined by the Village Engineer. Application fees are non-refundable. 777e applicant's Escrow Account must have a positive balance at all times prior to an Consultant,Attarnrv.or Village rerieu. Escrow Fees and Site Plan Fees must be paid on separate checks made pgvable to the Village of Rve Broak. ######t#####k########tt##tk##t#k##tt####t##k##t##########k###t#t#######t#t####t####t###k#t##t###t########## 1. Site Address:2 Rose Lane Rye Brook,New York 10573 Parcel ID#:_129.25 Block I Lot l Zone: 2. Property Owner: Kingfield Lot Owners Association,Inc. Address:c/o Plaza Realty&Management Corp. 1010 Hope Street 2nd Floor Stamford,CT 06907 E-Mail:wpalma@plazarealtymgmt.com Tel.#: ZfJ3 �S3' oZq Other: 3. Applicant: Same as property owner Address: E-Mail: Tel. #: Other: 4. Design Professional:Langan Engineering Address: I North Broadway Suite 910 White Plains,NY 10601 E- mail: lmcmahon@langan.com Tel.#:914 323 7400 Other:(David Gelfarb, Esq., gelfarb@,mosskalish.com,212 867 4488 legal counsel) 5. Designate to whom correspondence is to be sent:Design professional and legal counsel Note:ffapplicant is a"Contract Vendee'.please attach a cbp) ofthe contract summary with financial and confidential teens AWW 6. Street which property abuts: King Street 7. Does property connect directly into State or County highway? (x)NO ( )YES: 8. is site within 500 feet of Village Boundary?( )NO (x)YES if yes note all bordering municipalities: Harrison,NY 9. Total area of site: 31.537 acres _Area of site activity: 31.537 acres_ 10. Site coverage:—N/A. _ %; Building coverage:N/A 11. Existing building size:N/A _ _ New/additional building size:N/A 12. Existing parking spaces:N/A Unchanged New parking spaces N/A-Unchanged__ 13. Nature of proposed activity: Applicant seeks to amend its site plan to "swap" or"trade" 4,835 sq. ft. of impervious coverage between the common area of the development and the patios of residential homes.A total of 3,613.47 square feet of such coverage has been used as is set forth on the submitted drawings,short form EAF and correspondence to this Planning Board. ****************************************************************************************** Please note that this application must include the notarized signature(s) of the legal owner(s) of the above-mentioned property, in the space provided below.Any application not bearing the legal property owner's notarized signature(s)shall be deemed null and void, and will be returned to the applicant. STATE OF NEW YORK,COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER ) as: IWA-it2 Ny4 ,being duly sworn,deposes and states that he/she is the applicant above named, (print name of individual signing as the applicant) and further states Oat (s)he is the legal owner of the property to which this application pertains, or that (s)he is the Q A.>v*Ina1 for the legal owner and is duly authorized to make and file this application. X (indicate architect,contractor,agent,attorney,etc.) That all statements contained herein are true to the best of his/her knowledge and belief,and that any work performed,or use conducted at the above captioned property wil I be in conformance with the details as set forth and contained in this application and in any accompanying approved plans and specifications,as well as in accordance with the New York State Uniform Fire Prevention&Building Code,the Code of the Village of Rye Brook and all other applicable laws,ordinances and regulations. Sworn to before me this l 0 Sworn to before me this day of a,,'4'q/ '- ,2025 day of_ , 20 e,e Nota t is Notary Public X Sign re of Property Ownexx Signature of Applicant Vt Nit ft r (,�r Uw S /�sSa �a-ctn>,1, (�L. Print Name of Property Owner Print Name of Applicant EVE MARIE ALTIERI NOTARY Pusuc State of Connecticut My Commission Expires June 30,2026 2 611/2024 OC BROO, VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK . .,_,: 938 King Street,Rye,Brook,N.Y. 10573 (914)9�0=0753 www.ryebruokny;ov SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REVIEW CHECKLIST This form shall serve as a checklist for site plan submittal and review by the Village of Rye Brook. The use of this plan review checklist by the applicant is to ensure compliance with the technical provisions of§209 of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook entitled, Site Plan Review, pertaining to preliminary and final plan preparation. The Village Code is available on the Village Website at: www.rvebrooknN.yov. Prior to the appearance before ANY meeting or hearing of the Planning Board,the applicant must comply with all Notification Requirements of Code Section 250-40. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL SHALL INCLUDE: 1. APPLICATIONS. Completed and signed including correspondences. 2. CHECKLIST. Completed and signed. 3. PLANS. Signed, Sealed & Dated. Two paper (2) copies and one (1) electronic version. One (1) record set with original signatures,dates and seals shall be provided. 4. FEES: All application fees and Environmental fee. A separate check for filing fee and Environmental fee. 5. Environmental Assessment Form. Form available on the NYS DEC website and mapper. 6. Electronic Copy. Complete copy of all plans and shall be submitted electronically at time of submission. 7. Notarized Affidavit of Sign Posting& Mail Notification. 1, (Applicant's signature)have read the Notification Requirements of Code Section 250-40 and will provide notification as required. IDENTIFICATION OF APPLICANT(S): Identification of Applicant: Applicant:_Kingfield Lot Owners Association,Inc. Address:c/o Plaza Realty and ManageKment Corp. 1010 Hope Street 2nd Floor Stamford,Connecticut 06907 Tel.#: 203-359-46111 Fax:203-356-9741 E-Mail: _wpalma@plazarealtymgmt.com Project Name: Kingfield Site Plan Amendment Project Address: 2 Rose Lane Rye Brook,New York 10573 Current Property Owner: Kingfield Lot Owners Association, Inc. Address: c/o Plaza Realty& Management Corp. 1010 Hope Street 2nd Floor Stamford, CT 06907 Tel. #: 203 359 4611 Fax: 203-356-9741 _E-Mail:wpalma@plazarealtymgmt.com IDENTIFICATION OF PROPERTY: Identifying Title: Tax Designation: Section:129.25 Block: 1 Lot: 1 Zoning District: Street which property abuts: King Street Plan Submission Date: Site Plan Checklist Page 1 of 7 6/l/2024 Project Address 2 Rose Lane Rye Brook,NY Y N NA PLAN REQUIREMENTS 10573 x O O 2 copies of plans prepared and signed by a registered Land Surveyor,Engineer or Architect. x O O One(1)electronic copy of all submitted plans and surveys. O O x Topographic Survey stamped by New York State Land Surveyor with license number and seal. O O X Topographic survey scale of one(1)inch per twenty(20)feet or larger. O O X Section, block and lot numbers of the property taken from the latest tax records along with a copy of the most recent property card on file with the Town of Rye Tax Assessor's office. O O X Name of the proposed subdivision plan. x O O Name and address of the owner of record. ,x O O Name and address of the applicant. 00 1� Deed reference(s). O O Names, addresses and signature of every Engineer, Architect, Land Surveyor or Soil Scientist whose professional seal appears on any site plan submitted to the Board. 00 North arrow and scale. )M(O O Location map at the minimum scale of 1"equals 1,000 feet. 004 Area of all lots, in square feet. O O� Engineering notes on plans as stated in application packages. 004 Copies of all existing and proposed deed restrictions or covenants applying to the property, including, but not limited to, covenants and agreements restricting the use and establishing future ownership and maintenance responsibilities for all private roads,recreation,and open space areas. O O x Any prior land use approvals with respect to the subject property. O O 2� Date the plans were first drafted. Any revision(s)made to any of the sheets first submitted are to be so noted in the revision block. The revision block is to be placed on the originals of the revised sheets. Additional paper copies are to be made& submitted for the Planning Board&Building Dept.to replace those sheets previously submitted. O O;� Other existing site improvements,including,but not limited to,fences,landscape or retaining walls,landscaping & screening. O O� Location of all buildings and structures on the premises and approximate location of all neighboring buildings or structures within 100 feet of the lot line. X 00 Fees paid to The Village of Rye Brook Building Department. O O -A Any revisions to plans shall be identified with a revision cloud and numbered revision triangle V N NA ABUTTING PROPERTYINFORMATION O O R The names and addresses of all abutting property owners within 250 ft as indicated in the Municipal records. O O $�Y Zoning and use of abutting properties noted on plans. O O Shape,size,height and location of existing buildings and driveways within one hundred(100)feet of the site. O O Location and description of existing easements within one hundred(100)feet of the site. O O Location of existing private or public trails within one hundred(100)feet of the site. O O Location of existing roads,scenic roads and/or driveways within two hundred(200)feet of the site. O O Location of proposed parkland.If none state nearest recreation facility O O Location of existing septic system leach fields within two hundred(200)feet of the site. O O Locations,dimensions,grades and flow direction of existing sewers,culverts,waterlines as well as other underground utilities within and adjacent to the property. O O The location of all existing watercourses,intermittent streams,wetland areas and springs,consistent with the definitions set forth in Chapter 245,Wetlands and Watercourses,of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook. Site Plan Checklist Page 2 of 7 6/1/2024 2 �uj e Lq,e Project Address (��� ��� �21 Y N NA PROPOSED SITE PLANINFORMATION O O Sufficient, acceptable information to readily determine the location, bearing, and length of every street line, lot line, an �J property boundary line. O O R Location of all building setback lines. O O Topographic data at a minimum contour interval of 2'-0"increments,showing existing and proposed contours on the property and extending a minimum of 25 feet into all adjacent properties. O O The location and characteristics of the different areas of vegetation,including the identification of all individual trees 12 or more inches in diameter at breast height("DBH"),protected trees of any size,as well as stands of trees and wooded areas, within areas of proposed disturbance, consistent with the provisions of Chapter 235, Trees, of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook. O O Location and proposed development of all buffer areas,including existing vegetative cover. O O 6(� Location and description of any zoning district and municipal boundaries including a zoning compliance chart for the existing and proposed lots. O O Shape,size,height and location of all existing and proposed buildings. O O Location and description of any existing and proposed easements. O O Location and dimensions of all existing and proposed streets,driveways,sidewalks,parking spaces,bicycle parking, loading areas and other facilities associated with the proposed use. O O Identification of the location and amount of building area proposed for retail sales or similar commercial activity. O O Location of existing and proposed utilities(water,sewer,gas,electrical,telephone,oil tank etc.). O O Design and location of all existing and proposed wells,septic tanks and leach field systems,or methods of waste water disposal. O O �1 Location,type and size of all existing and proposed landscaping and screening including fences and walls. O O Location,size and proposed screening of outdoor storage areas,if any. O O Location, design and construction material of all existing or proposed site improvements, including drains, culverts, retaining walls, landscape walls and fences. O O Exterior lighting plan and proposed signs to be located on site,including sign orientation,size,height,and elevation view. O O Storm drainage plan and plans for snow removal and storage. O O Pedestrian and automobile circulation plan. O O Construction drawings for pavements,walks,steps,curbing,drainage&other structures associated with the proposed use. O O Erosion and sedimentation control plan,including installation details of proposed control measures,directive construction notations and a schedule for the installation and maintenance of proposed control measure. O 04 Description of measures planned to assure proper erosion and sedimentation control in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 1]8 entitled"Erosion and Sediment Control,"of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook. O O Drawing and computation for storm water detention design for a 25-year storm in accordance with the Westchester County Best Management Practices O O Rock outcroppings and areas of steep slope consistent with the definitions set forth in Chapter 213,Steep Slope Protection, of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook. O O kF Location of any common lands and/or public lands. O O �( Phasing or an estimated project construction schedule. O O �17 Supporting documents,including deeds,maintenance,condominium agreements,etc. O O K Location of proposed construction or area of disturbance and its relationship to any property line, easement, building, structure, road, wall, fence, sewage disposal system, well, wetland feature or tree exceeding six inches in diameter measured at a height of four feet from the ground Site Plan Checklist Page 3 of 7 6/1/2024 Z e use the Project Address L v t,it O O Q"" Estimate of earthwork showing the quantity of any material to be imported to and/or removed f�m th-e site tncluding � a chart with the number/species and size of any trees to be removed. O O �V, Location and size of areas of soils by soil types in the area of proposed disturbance and to a distance of 100 feet J surrounding the area of disturbance. O O Cross sections of steep slope areas. O O Retaining walls or like constructions,with details of construction. O O Approximate boundaries of any areas subject to flooding or stormwater overflows, including areas of special flood hazard and coastal high-hazard areas, consistent with the definitions set forth in Chapter 130, Flood Damage Prevention, of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook.Approximate Wetlands and wetland buffer boundaries shall be clearly delineated. O O Location of fire and other emergency zones,including the location of fire hydrants. O O Studies to include,but not necessarily limited to: environmental impact analysis,wildlife,traffic,stormwater management,recreation,public service,fiscal impact,visual impact and historic significance documentation,or a written request to waive the submission requirements for these studies. O O Amount of any bonds required. O O Amount of excavated material to be removed from site,if any. Y N NA OTHER(as applicable) O Oe%� Record of application for and approval status of all necessary permits from state and county officials and local utility companies. O O Identification of any federal,state or county permits required for the project's execution,including project referrals, if any,&environmental review procedures mandated by Article 8,Environmental Quality Review,of the Environmental Conservation Law(SEQRA). O O Any other information felt necessary by the Planning Board to allow the Board to proceed with consideration&to make an informed decision. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CHECKLIST WESTCHESTER COUNTY PLANNING BOARD Notice to Applicants/Developers: At some point during the development review process your project may be referred to the Westchester County Planning Board for review and comment in accordance with state and county laws that require local planning boards, zoning boards of appeals and governing bodies to refer certain development applications to the County Planning Board. Referral to the County Planning Board may not occur until your project has progressed well along through the design process. Since the Planning Board's comments may impact project design,this checklist is provided to encourage early consideration of these areas of concern by applicants to avoid project changes later. For information on the County Planning Board review process and to access an electronic copy of this checklist, go online to www.westchestergov.com/planningreferrals or contact Lukas Herbert at IahS@westchestergov.com. I.COUNTY PLANNING BOARD POLICIES: Written policies underlie all recommendations of the County Planning Board. Westchester 2025-Context for County and Municipal Planning and Policies to Guide County Planning,adopted by the County Planning Board on 5/6/08,amended 115110,can be found at www.westchestergov.com/2025. ❑Westchester 2025:Policies should be reviewed to determine how they relate to the development proposal. II.IMPACTS TO COUNTY FACILITIES AND SERVICES: The County Planning Board coordinates the review of development projects with Westchester County departments to identify and address potential impacts on County services and infrastructure.In some situations,permits and approvals may be required that could change project design. ❑ Map of County Facilities: Review the State & County Roads and Parks map (which also includes county channel lines) to identify proximity to County facilities at: www.westchestergov.com/pIanningdocs/pdfmaps/countystateroadsparks.pdf. Other useful map links for information about environmental features, septic/sewer map, county sewer districts map, etc can be found at: www.westchestergov.com/maps Site Plan Checklist Page 4 of 7 6/l/2024 Project Address ❑ COUNTY ROAD: Applications for development on sites that abut a County road must be submitted for review by the County Department of Public Works. Information and forms can be found at: www.westchestergov.com/dpw/bldgperm.htm. Former County Roads do not need review by the Department of Public Works,but will still likely trigger a review by the County Planning Board. ❑ COUNTY CHANNEL LINES: Applications for development on sites within 100 feet of a designated County Channel Line require a stream control permit from the County Department of Public Works. Information and forms can be found at: www.westchestergov.com/dpw/bidgpenn.htm ❑ COUNTY PARK: New construction& land alteration projects adjacent to County parks are expected to address screening& buffer of new uses from the park, as appropriate. Stormwater should not drain from a developed site onto a County park without acceptable quantity and quality controls.County parks are designated as Critical Environmental Areas. ❑ SEWAGE TREATMENT AT COUNTY TREATMENT PLANT: Local municipalities are required to reduce and eliminate inflow and infiltration(I&I)into the sanitary sewage systems tributary to County treatment plants.New development will be expected to reduce I&I in relation to generation of new flow at a ratio of three to one. This requirement must be discussed with local officials. ❑BEE-LINE BUS SERVICE: Bee-Line bus stops serving a development site should be identified on plans or noted if located off-site. If a bus stop is located along the site's frontage, the applicant should contact the County Department of Transportation to discuss impacts and the need for improvements. Safe and separate pedestrian access should be provided to link a bus stop and sidewalk with building entrances. Information on County bus service and design guidelines can be found at: westchestergov.com/transportation/imagesBus%20Servi ce%2OGu id el ines.pdf ❑FAIR AND AFFORDABLE HOUSING: Many municipalities require inclusion of fair & affordable units in new developments. Financial assistance to achieve fair & affordable housing development is available through Westchester County & other sources. Applications that include new residential units to be affirmatively marketed& sold or rented subject to fair& affordable housing provisions should be tied to Westchester County guidelines on affordability including income guidelines of eligible households that can be found at: http://homes.westchestergov.com/. If County funding is sought to develop fair & affordable housing,the County Board of Legislators must be included as an involved agency under SEQR. ❑RECYCLING: New buildings must contain a designated area of sufficient size for separation and storage of recyclables and trash. Building expansions should also include sufficient space for separation and storage of recyclables. For more information about County recycling requirements go to:www.westchestergov.com/environment_recycling.htm ❑STORM SEWER SYSTEM: Any connections to a County storm sewer line will require a permit from the Department of Public Works in accordance with the County Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination(IDDE) law. Information& forms can be found at:www.westchestergov.com/dpw/bldgpenn.htm Non-stormwater discharges to the County storm sewer system are prohibited. III.DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS The County Planning Board's land use policies focus attention on several aspects of development that may have intermunicipal and quality of life impacts.The list below includes areas most frequently commented on by the County Planning Board. ❑WATER: All development plans should include sufficient provisions for stonnwater management, water quality measures and mitigation of flooding. ❑Plans should identify the major drainage basin or watershed the site is located in (Croton River, Upper Hudson River. Lower Hudson,Upper Long Island Sound,Bronx River and Lower Long Island Sound). An interactive map with watershed boundaries can be found at www.westchestergov.com/planning/maps&lists/drainbasinsI Ixl7.html ❑Watershed plans have been developed for several of the County's watersheds - the Croton, Indian Brook-Croton Gorge, Bronx River & Long Island Sound watersheds - that include specific recommendations that apply to development projects. See recommendations in watershed plans at:planning.westchestergov.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id= 1231& Itemid=2204 ❑Development that involves filling, creation of impervious surfaces or buildings and substantive loss of natural vegetation in a floodplain or flood prone area should be avoided. Site Plan Checklist Page 5 of 7 6/l/2024 Project Address ❑Above ground,vegetated retention/detention basins or devices are preferred because they perform better,are easier to inspect and maintain and provide additional environmental benefits over subsurface structural devices. Any such treatments should not be constructed within wetlands or buffer areas around wetlands. ❑The development should treat and retain as much stormwater on-site as possible,particularly when the site is located in a drainage basin with known flooding problems. A Construction Stormwater Toolbox with tools and sources of technical information related to the construction activities and stormwater management best practices is available from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation at:www.dec.ny.gov/cliemical/8694.htmI []New development should include protection of aquatic resources. For more information about protection of aquatic resources& buffer areas,go to: planning.westchestergov.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1491&Itemid=2458 ❑Impervious cover should be minimized.Permeable paving surfaces should be used where feasible. Vegetative rain gardens should be used,particularly in areas of overland or channelized stormwater flow,to improve stormwater quality and reduce runoff volume. For more information,go to: www.westchestergov.com/stormwater ❑Buildings along coastlines and low lying area should consider the impacts of sea level rise. Specific consideration is required of potential impacts to surface and subsurface drinking water supplies. ❑ SITE LAYOUT.Aesthetic design,building orientation and community character should be considered in the site layout and building appearance. ❑In most locations,buildings should face the street and have pedestrian access from the street. ❑Commercial buildings should be located near the front street line with the majority of parking located in the rear of the building. Even gas stations and convenience stores should be upfront in a landscaped setting with parking,pumps and canopy toward the rear. ❑Buildings should be of pedestrian-scale when seen from the sidewalk. ❑Building facades should contribute to and enhance the character of the community. ❑Driveway and pathway connections should be provided to adjacent sites when possible and cross easements provided. ❑ STREETS. Street design should reduce unwarranted paving and promote connectivity. ❑New streets should connect with adjacent streets wherever feasible to prevent the proliferation of dead-end streets and promote neighborhood integration. ❑Connections could be vehicular or pedestrian/bicycle only,where appropriate. ❑Street widths should be minimized for streets with low traffic volume to reduce speeds and impervious surfaces.Lane widths of 12 feet are only appropriate for major roadways. El Driveway widths should be no more than 9 feet to reduce impervious surfaces. ❑Permeable paving surfaces should be used where feasible. ❑ GREEN TECHNOLOGY.New development should include as many green building elements as possible,such as:renewable building materials,energy efficient heating/cooling systems and fixtures,water saving devices,green roofs and permeable paving surfaces.Information can be obtained from the U.S.Green Building Council at: www.usgbc.org. ❑ LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING.The site improvements should enhance community character. ❑ Landscaping should consist of native plant species appropriate for the location.Invasive plant species should be prohibited. Invasive plant information available at:www.westchestergov.com/planning/environmental/Reports/InvasivePlantsBroch08.pdf ❑ Pollutant tolerant plantings should effectively shield parking,loading areas and refuse collection sites. Site Plan Checklist Page 6 of 7 6/l/2024 Project Address ❑ Site lighting should be provided at the lowest safe levels and lowest heights,avoiding all spillage off site. ❑ PEDESTRIANS.Safe,convenient and ADA accessible pedestrian access is provided. ❑ A sidewalk should be provided along the site frontage along each street. ❑ Direct pedestrian connections should be made from the front of the building to the sidewalk.Pedestrian crossings of drive-ways& parking lots should be minimized or avoided.If they must be provided,painted crosswalks should be provided through parking lots. ❑ ADA accessibility must be provided. ❑ BICYCLISTS.Provisions for bicyclists should be incorporated into project design. ❑ Bicycle parking should be provided in commercial and residential developments.Guidelines can be found at: www.apbp.org/resource/resmgr/pub I ications/b i cyc I e_parking_gu idel i nes.pdf ❑ If near a trailway or bicycle route,extra consideration should be given to bicycle accessibility such as bike lanes on internal roadways,bicycle parking and other amenities. ❑ Drive-thru lanes at uses such as banks and fast-food restaurants should also be accessible for bicycles. Waiver: Upon finding by the Building Inspector, Village Engineer, Planning Board or Board of Trustees that, due to the particular character or limited nature of development or change in use or to special conditions peculiar to a site,the submission of a final site plan,or certain portions of information normally required as part of the site development plan, is inappropriate or unnecessary or that strict compliance with said submission requirements will cause extraordinary and unnecessary hardship, such official or Board may waive such submission requirements wherever, in the opinion of such official or Board, such waiver will be consistent with the goal of promoting the public health, safety and general welfare of the community. The findings for granting such waiver shall become a part of the public record. Any waiver request must be made in writing,and include sufficient detailed information for the appropriate authority to make an informed decision. Design Professional's Certification of Completion of Checklist I have fully reviewed the Village of Rye Brook's requirements and certify this application to be a complete submission. I understand that an incomplete plat or incomplete checklist shall be deemed an incomplete submission and shall be returned to the applicant upon determination of such by the appropriate authority. Name(Print) Signature Date Professional Sea] Site Plan Checklist Page 7 of 7 6/1/2024 Project Address ❑ Site lighting should be provided at the lowest safe levels and lowest heights,avoiding all spillage off site. ❑ PEDESTRIANS.Safe,convenient and ADA accessible pedestrian access is provided. ❑ A sidewalk should be provided along the site frontage along each street. ❑ Direct pedestrian connections should be made from the front of the building to the sidewalk.Pedestrian crossings of drive-ways& parking lots should be minimized or avoided. If they must be provided,painted crosswalks should be provided through parking lots. ❑ ADA accessibility must be provided. ❑ BICYCLISTS.Provisions for bicyclists should be incorporated into project design. ❑ Bicycle parking should be provided in commercial and residential developments.Guidelines can be found at: www.apbp.org/resource,'resntgr/ptiblications/hicyc le_rarking_guidelines.pdf ❑ If near a trailway or bicycle route,extra consideration should be given to bicycle accessibility such as bike lanes on internal roadways,bicycle parking and other amenities. ❑ Drive-thru lanes at uses such as banks and fast-food restaurants should also be accessible for bicycles. Waiver: Upon finding by the Building Inspector, Village Engineer, Planning Board or Board of Trustees that, due to the particular character or limited nature of development or change in use or to special conditions peculiar to a site,the submission of a final site plan,or certain portions of information normally required as part of the site development plan, is inappropriate or unnecessary or that strict compliance with said submission requirements will cause extraordinary and unnecessary hardship, such official or Board may waive such submission requirements wherever, in the opinion of such official or Board, such waiver will be consistent with the goal of promoting the public health, safety and general welfare of the community. The findings for granting such waiver shall become a part of the public record. Any waiver request must be made in writing,and include sufficient detailed information for the appropriate authority to make an informed decision. Desien Professional's Certification of Completion of Checklist I have fully reviewed the Village of Rye Brook's requirements and certify this application to be a complete submission. I understand that an incomplete plat or incomplete checklist shall be deemed an incomplete submission and shall be returned to the applicant upon determination of such by the appropriate authority. Name(Print)_ (C of NE `, y,�P�G�PEL J. p��yp,P Signature t * 92 r� Date n p81A73 � sslo Site Plan Checklist Page 7 of 7 6/I/2024 \ / \ Cl § \ � \ \ c m \ -r J Ln AC-0 C- ru 6 cc m =a r Co co N \ /4k 0 \\ 0 / cc0 e q ƒ S o J ƒ S _ - / 0 - 0 = - 22 IX > � / w = 0 ] J § &R y b e m a = k C LL < % \ \ a) No w 0 �$\ %±}ƒ \ / \\� 0 �_ 0 �F§ 2 -j\ Ea > / 52= a 7/i/ $ : ±5 % / C:0 .. ON LL £ �• ° 222 0 Qf k R EC EWE Short Environmental Assessment Form APR 15 2025 Part I -Project Information VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK Instructions for Completing BUILDING DEPARTMENT Part l—Project Information. The applicant or project sponsor is responsible for the completion of Part 1. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding,are subject to public review,and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part I based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item,please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information. Complete all items in Part 1.You may also provide any additional information which you believe will be needed by or useful to the lead agency;attach additional pages as necessary to supplement any item. Part 1—Project and Sponsor Information Name of Action or Project: Kingfield Lot Owners Association Site Plan Amendment Project Location(describe,and attach a location map): Kingfield residential devlopment in Rye Brook.See attached drawing. Brief Description of Proposed Action: A resolution enacted by the Board of Trustees on February 13,2018 with respect to the Kingfield development provided that up to 4,835 square feet of additional impervious surface coverage may be added to the common area shown on the Amended Site Plan without further review by the Village.The same resolution provided that no expansion or additions of decks,patios or other impervious surface were permitted on residential lots other than what was shown on the Amended PUD Site Plan.To date, 3,613.47 square feet of additional impervious surface has been added to residential patios. Applicant seeks to"swap"or"trade"the 4,835 square feet of impervious coverage that is permitted in common areas,but that has not been utilized of developed, in exchange for adding a like amount of impervious square footage to the patios in the Kingfield development. Name of Applicant or Sponsor: Telephone: 203-359-4611 Kingfield Lot Owners Association,Inc. E-Mail: wpalma@plazarealtymgmt.com Address: clo Plaza Realty and Management Corp.1010 Hope Street 2nd Floor City/PO: State: Zip Code: Stamford Connecticut 06907 1. Does the proposed action only involve the legislative adoption of a plan,local law,ordinance, NO YES administrative rule,or regulation? If Yes,attach a narrative description of the intent of the proposed action and the environmental resources that ❑✓ ❑ may be affected in the municipality and proceed to Part 2. If no,continue to question 2. 2. Does the proposed action require a permit,approval or funding from any other government Agency? NO YES If Yes,list agency(s)name and permit or approval: ❑ 3. a.Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? 31.537 acres b.Total acreage to be physically disturbed? -0-acres c.Total acreage(project site and any contiguous properties)owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? 31.537 acres 4. Check all land uses that occur on,are adjoining or near the proposed action: ❑Urban ❑ Rural(non-agriculture) ❑ Industrial m Commercial m Residential (suburban) ❑ Forest ❑ Agriculture ❑ Aquatic ❑ Other(Specify): ❑Parkland Page 1 of 3 SEAF 2019 5. Is the proposed action, NO YES N/A a. A permitted use under the zoning regulations? ❑ ❑ IZI- b. Consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan? ❑ ❑ Z NO YES 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the predominant character of the existing built or natural landscape? ❑ Z 7. Is the site of the proposed action located in,or does it adjoin,a state listed Critical Environmental Area? NO YES ,Reason:Exceptional or unique character,Agency:Westchester County,Date:1-31-90 If Yes,identify: ❑ FZ NO YES 8. a. Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels? ❑✓ ❑ b. Are public transportation services available at or near the site of the proposed action? ❑ c. Are any pedestrian accommodations or bicycle routes available on or near the site of the proposed ❑ action? 9. Does the proposed action meet or exceed the state energy code requirements? NO YES If the proposed action will exceed requirements,describe design features and technologies: N/A ❑ ❑ I-0. Will the proposed action connect to an existing public/private water supply? NO YES If No,describe method for providing potable water: N/A 11. Will the proposed action connect to existing wastewater utilities? NO YES If No,describe method for providing wastewater treatment: N/A ❑ ❑ 12. a.Does the project site contain,or is it substantially contiguous to,a building,archaeological site,or district NO YES which is listed on the National or State Register of Historic Places,or that has been determined by the ❑ Commissioner of the NYS Office of Parks,Recreation and Historic Preservation to be eligible for listing on the State Register of Historic Places? b.Is the project site,or any portion of it,located in or adjacent to an area designated as sensitive for ❑✓ ❑ archaeological sites on the NY State Historic Preservation Office(SHPO)archaeological site inventory? 13. a. Does any portion of the site of the proposed action,or lands adjoining the proposed action,contain NO YES wetlands or other waterbodies regulated by a federal,state or local agency? ❑ ❑ b. Would the proposed action physically alter,or encroach into,any existing wetland or waterbody? ❑ If Yes,identify the wetland or waterbody and extent of alterations in square feet or acres: Page 2 of 3 14. Identify the typical habitat types that occur on,or are likely to be found on the project site.Check all that apply: ❑Shoreline ❑ Forest ❑Agricultural/grasslands ❑ Early mid-successional ❑Wetland ❑ Urban ox Suburban 15. Does the site of the proposed action contain any species of animal,or associated habitats,listed by the State or NO YES Federal government as threatened or endangered? El ❑ Sedge Wren 16. Is the project site located in the 100-year flood plan? NO YES ❑ ❑✓ 17. Will the proposed action create storm water discharge,either from point or non-point sources? NO YES If Yes, Ful a. Will storm water discharges flow to adjacent properties? ❑ b. Will storm water discharges be directed to established conveyance systems(runoff and storm drains)? ❑ If Yes,briefly describe: Any additional impervious area resulting from expanded patios will be"swapped" or"traded"for previously approved impervious coverage in common areas of the development which has not been developed or utilized 18. Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that would result in the impoundment of water NO YES or other liquids(e.g.,retention pond,waste lagoon,dam)? If Yes,explain the purpose and size of the impoundment: ❑ 19. Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the location of an active or closed solid waste NO YES management facility? If Yes,describe: 5Q F] 20.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the subject of remediation(ongoing or NO YES completed)for hazardous waste? If Yes,describe: ❑ ❑ I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE '/ Applicant/sponsor/name: K--1► ,ho `�W � `�� i �N�'�(Date: Signature: Title)( MA)*Q1 ► - PRINT FORM Page 3 of 3 EAF Mapper Summary Report Monday, March 24, 2025 6:04 PM Disclaimer: The EAF Mapper is a screening tool intended to assist project sponsors and reviewing agencies in preparing an environmental assessment form(EAF).Not all questions asked in the EAF are answered by the EAF Mapper.Additional information on any EAF V question can be obtained by consulting the EAF Workbooks. Although the EAF Mapper provides the most up-to-date digital data available to DEC,you may also need to contact local or other data sources in order / to obtain data not provided by the Mapper.Digital data is not a substitute for agency determinations. r; c. Bat., KlnaPor I+ o•q - R y Toronto- Harrison F•:VRrer or Bultala LI ! oc_,ic.. EsI HEP� Garr it I;`GS Irterr>>• lt.tgEMVK "a ,P u ai+ -Si. H`RL t m Lt!>G" I vi,ot CF..["E'V1 F `i . L., i&!,v iil'' L., +�h�",I. _.. .Ix' I.It ' :.t �lur�ti au _i : '_I _Ira E.1 h -- H<-.r- I.r,r�n Emi r are., f.�n "hailgrrl - ^.ner�treet.A3(�r�71rc:,.tcr y^,". -h=�a^r: ;•,6:- "r��5tt^,�f4SaI•, -:rtr:�.Jcr�r�. ,trr t-t. ',117 're Esn -SERE.tsar rlr ft"i!/Ctc p•,pc om.�ro.w Part 1 /Question 7 [Critical Environmental Yes Area] Part 1 /Question 7 [Critical Environmental Reason:Exceptional or unique character, Agency.-Westchester County, Area - Identify] Date:1-31-90 Part 1 /Question 12a [National or State No Register of Historic Places or State Eligible Sites] Part 1 /Question 12b [Archeological Sites] No Part 1 /Question 13a [Wetlands or Other Yes- Digital mapping information on local and federal wetlands and Regulated Waterbodies] waterbodies is known to be incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. Part 1 /Question 15 [Threatened or Yes Endangered Animal] Part 1 /Question 15[Threatened or Sedge Wren Endangered Animal - Name] Part 1 /Question 16 [100 Year Flood Plain] Yes Part 1 /Question 20 [Remediation Site] No Short Environmental Assessment Form - EAF Mapper Summary Report 1 Tara Orlando From: David Gelfarb<gelfarb@mosskahsh.com> Sent: Wednesday,November 5,2025 3:00 PTNl To: Tara Orlando Cc: Michal Nowak Subject: RE:Kingfield-Rye Brook Hi Tara: Good afternoon. As you know, we represent the Kingfield Lot Owners Association, Inc. in connection with its proceeding before the Planning Board. This matter has previously been adjourned to the November 13th meeting. Applicant respectfully requests that the matter be adjourned again until the December 111h meeting. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. Thanks, David DA V I D ES Q Moss& Kalish, PLLC 122 East 42Id Street Suite 2100 New York, New York 10168 (212) 867-4488 (Office) (917) 817-8046 (Mobile) (212) 983-5276 (Fax) CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this e-mail is attorney privileged and confidential information. It is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, electronic storage or use of this communication is prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, attaching the original message, and delete the original message from your computer, and any network to which your computer is connected. Communications from our firm contain or incorporate federal tax advice. Under recently promulgated US Internal Revenue Service (IRS) standards, we are required to inform you that only formal, written tax opinions meeting IRS requirements may be relied upon by taxpayers for the purpose of avoiding tax-related penalties. Accordingly, this communication is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding tax-related penalties under the Internal Revenue Code. 1 D ECENE DEC - 5 2025 STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK PLANNING BOARD BUILDING DEPARTMENT -----------—--------------------------------------------------X In the Matter of the Application of Kingfield Planning Board Meeting Date: Lot Owners Association, Inc. to Amend Approved December 11, 2025 at 6:30 P.M. Site Plan, ----—----------------------------------------------------------X STATE OF NEW YORK ) ) ss.: COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER ) ERIC STEILMAN,being duly sworn,deposes and says: 1. I am over the age of 18 years. I reside in Westchester County,New York. I have personal knowledge of the facts and circumstances set forth herein. I submit this affidavit in connection with the application of the Kingfield Lot Owners Association, Inc. ("Kingfield")to amend its site plan. 2. On December 1,2025 I placed a public notice sign on the referenced property adjacent to the Kingfield clubhouse at 1 Rose Lane,in the Village of Rye Brook. 3. I have posted public notice signs on numerous occasions in the Village of Rye Brook and am familiar with the requirements of the Village Code with respect to public notice signs. 4. The sign was intended to comply with the notification requirements of Village Code Section 250-40(A). The sign was posted more than seven days prior to the continued public hearing b the Plannin Board on the captioned matter, in compliance with Code Section 250-40 A 1 Y g P P ( )( )(b). The sign complied with the format requirements of Village Code Section 250-40(A)(2). RIC E MW Sworn to before me this q�y of December,2025, MARCUS T.FEQUIERE Notary Public j Nowr -wt*of FbrW§ Commissim I HH 617142 °�.,•• My Comm.Expires Doc 2,2029 1 1 MOSS & KALISH , PLLC COUNSELLORS AT LAW 122 EAST 4211D STREET MARK L.KALISH NEW Y O R K, NY 1 01 6 8-0 0 9 8 NASSAU OFFICE DAVID B.GELFARB� ___ 500 OLD COUNTY,SUITE 206 GARDEN CITY,NY 11530 .IAMES$CHWARTZMAN TELEPHONE: (212) 867-4488 —_ TELECOPIER: (212) 983-5276 writeese-mail: 'lLLSO AmniEO IN NEW JERSEY E-MAIL: LAWYERS @ M O S S K A L I S H.C O M gelfarb@mosskalish.com December 1,2025 Honorable Chairman Robert Goodman D E (� [E � V LE and Members of the Village Planning Board Village of Rye Brook DEC - 1 2025 ID 938 King Street Rye Brook,New York 10573 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK BUILDING DEPARTMENT Re: Kingfield Lot Owners Association, Inc. Application for Site Plan Amendment Rose Lane, Rye Brook,NY 10573 Parcel ID No. 129.25-1-1 Dear Honorable Chairman Goodman and Members of the Planning Board: We are the attorneys for the Kingfield Lot Owners Association, Inc. (the"Association"). I write in further support of the Association's application to amend the PUD site plan for the Kingfield residential development ("Kingfield" or the "Development"). The site plan was approved by the Board of Trustees on February 23, 2016, amended by the Board of Trustees on January 10,2017 and October 30,2017(the"2017 Resolution"),and further amended by the Board of Trustees on February 13, 2018 (following a Report and Recommendation by this Board dated February 8, 2018)(the"2018 Resolution"). In particular, I write to follow up on the work session that was conducted at Village Hall on November 14,2025 and to incorporate in the application,as warranted, points and suggestions that were addressed by Village Staff, the Board and the Association. By way of review, the 2018 Resolution noted that Kingfield had 4,835 square feet of unused impervious surface coverage.The Association requests that the Village authorize a"swap" or"trade"of 4,835 square feet of(unused) impervious surface coverage from the common area of Kingfield to the homeowners for use in connection with their patios. As was addressed in connection with the recent work session, the Association respectfully requests that the site plan application be approved to allow this allocation of the 4,835 square feet. We are aware that the Association has previously requested that the Board allow the unused impervious surface to be used for decks, walkways or other impervious surfaces as well. In the interest of simplicity and finality,the Association is asking that the unused impervious surface be Honorable Chairman Robert Goodman December 1,2025 Page 2 allocated to patios. If the Board wishes to expand the resolution to include decks, walkways and other impervious surfaces,the Association is willing to consider that request. We note that to date, no homeowner has asked to expand any impervious surface other than patios. Moreover,as far as the Association is aware, there has been no enforcement action by the Village with respect to any impervious surface other than patios. There are 110 homes at Kingfield. There are 4,835 square feet of impervious surface coverage available for allocation to the homes.As was agreed upon in principle at the work session, each home will be"assigned"or"credited"with an equal share of the available impervious square footage. Accordingly, each home will receive an allotment of 4,835 square feet1110, or 43.95 square feet,which rounds up to 44 square feet per home. The drawings and Expanded Patio Calculations prepared Langan Engineering, CS-100, CS-101 and CS-102 state that 9 homes have expanded their patios by less than 44 square feet, while 26 homes have expanded their patios by an amount greater than 44 square feet. We are of course aware that the Board is concerned about the "fairness" and "equity" of any proposal for allocating the 4,835 square feet among the homeowners. The Association anticipates that many, if not most, of the 26 homes that have expanded their patios beyond 44 square feet will seek to obtain enough square footage so that they are not faced with tearing up all or part of their additional patio or contesting enforcement procedures in Court. As we set forth in our September 2,2025 letter to the Board,the standards to be applied by the Planning Board in reviewing this application are set forth in New York Village Law §7-725- a(4)("Conditions attached to the approval of site plans"),Village Code("Code")§2094A through J ("Planning Board consideration in review") and Code §209-7A ("[t]he approval authority shall decide whether to approve, modify, or deny the application for site plan approval based upon the factors listed in 2094A through J hereof'). These standards simply provide that the Planning Board may allow the allocation for impervious surfaces from the common areas to homes in furtherance of the Community and based upon the fact there will be no adverse impact in connection therewith. Although not legally required, the Association intends to establish a fair and equitable system for reviewing applications to enlarge patios. While the details of Kingfield's plan for allocating the additional square footage will require further refinement based upon stakeholder input and the course of future events, we envision the institution of a system along the following lines. Each homeowner will have a certain period to "claim" their 44 square feet. While the specific period remains to be determined,the Association expects that it will be at least six months. In other words, any homeowner will be free to submit an application during that time to expand their patio by up to 44 square feet. The Kingfield Board intends to apply .certain standards in reviewing and granting applications for patio expansion. These standards shall include a possible cap on the additional square footage to be allowed for a given patio and the impact on the community, including Honorable Chairman Robert Goodman December 1, 2025 Page 3 aesthetics. The Kingfield Board will consider compatibility, contextual relationship, proportion, rhythm, scale,colors and materials. Priority will be given to increases that relate favorably to the Development's planning, landscaping, topography and existing character. It is possible that there will be a possible cap on the additional square footage to be allowed for a given patio, although it is not presently anticipated that this will apply to expansions of 44 square feet or less. The Association further intends to require that the workmanship be equal to the quality of the existing patio. Another consideration to be considered is the impact on the privacy and normal use of neighboring properties. In any event, absolutely no expansion will be permitted without review by and approval by the Kingfield Board or a duly designated committee established by the Kingfield Board. The Kingfield Board is cognizant that, and will continue to explain to homeowners, that any homeowners seeking to expand their patios (or to "legalize" an expansion that has already occurred) will have to resolve any outstanding violations, pay application fees to the Village, submit applicable plans and obtain any required building permits. The nine homes that have used each enlarged their patio by less than 44 square feet have used a total of 215.30 square feet. The remaining 26 homes have expanded their patios by a total, in the aggregate,of 3,398.15 square feet. To the extent that these 26 homes, or any other homeowners, want to expand their patios beyond the 44 square feet available to all homeowners,the Kingfield Board will establish a system whereby square footage is in effect transferred from homeowners who have a lesser need or desire for such space to those who have a greater need or desire for it. The Association currently envisions the following mechanism for bringing such transfers about. After the defined period for"claiming" and utilizing allotments has expired, homeowners who need greater than 44 square feet will be able to purchase additional square feet from the Association. For example, assume a homeowner, "Smith,"has a patio that has been expanded by 119 square feet. Such a homeowner would need an additional 75 square feet (119-44 = 75), to legalize their patio. Smith would pay the Association,a fee of, for example$30 per square foot for 75 additional square feet, or $2,250.00. The 75 square feet would be deducted from the remaining impervious surface that has been allotted to homeowners who have not applied for an expansion. Kingfield anticipates that there will also be an application fee for each application submitted to expand(or legalize the prior expansion of)a patio. The fee may be a flat fee, or may be partially flat and partially based on the size of the expansion. The details, procedures and mechanics of purchases of additional square footage from the Association will be determined in greater detail by the Association. Kingfield will engage in a Honorable Chairman Robert Goodman December 1,2025 Page 4 robust communication program, including holding a meeting of homeowners, to explain the proposed system for legalizing patios and processing applications for expansion of patios. The Association understands the significance, particularly with respect to stormwater management, of not going beyond the impervious surface limitation that has been established for the Development. The Association intends to keep careful records of applications and authorizations in order to ensure that it stays within the limits approved by the Board. The Association will also establish a process for keeping track of the square footage of additional impervious surface that is allowed. At this point, we plan to have the Kingfield Board oversee it. Management and Langan Engineering will be engaged in this process on an as-needed basis.Upon request,the Association will provide the Village Engineer information with respect to the amount of impervious space that has been added, and how much remains, from the 4,835 square feet remaining pursuant to the 2018 Resolution. In our September 2,2025 letter to the Board,we addressed options that the Kingfield Board could consider, if as and when Kingfield reached the 4,835 square foot limit, for addressing potential future requests for expansion of patios. However, given the discussion at the work session, as well as the plan for equitably and fairly distributing the 4,835 square feet among the 110 Kingfield homeowners, we believe that it is premature and frankly unnecessary to address with the Planning Board what the Association may elect to do in the future at this time. We recognize that there has been concern expressed about sheds, because they can add impervious surface and do not require a building permit. As was discussed at the work session, and in our September 2, 2025 submission, the Association has no intent of allowing sheds. None have ever been requested. In conclusion, it is respectfully submitted that the Planning Board should approve the Association's application for a site plan amendment as set forth herein given that the Development has 4,835 square feet of unused impervious surface and the amendment will have no adverse impact on stormwater runoff or any other adverse impacts. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. We look forward to further discussing this application with the Planning Board at its December 11,2025 meeting. Respectfully submitted, David B. Gelfarb cc: Jennifer Gray, Esq. 445 Hamilton Avenue.14th Floor VCUDDY White Plains, New York 10601 T 914 7611300 +FEDER NOV , 2 2025 F 914 7615372 LLP L_ cuddyfeder.com Daniel Conant dconant(&cuddyfeder.com November 11, 2025 VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL(tor1ando(&1!yebroolrny.gov) Chairman Robert Goodman and Members of the Planning Board Village of Rye Brook Village Hall 938 King Street Rye Brook,NY 10573 Attn: Tara Orlando Re: Proposed Landscaping—Site Plan Amendment Application(PB25-007) Applicant: The Enclave at Rye Brook Homeowners Association Premises: 24-30 Carol Court, Rye Brook,New York Parcel IDs: 129..'15-1-14.25— 12q.�ri-1-14.�0 Dear Chairman Goodman and Members of the Planning Board: On behalf of our client,the Blind Brook Club, Inc. (the"Club"), owner of the adjoining property at 98o Anderson Hill Road,we respectfully submit this letter to express our concerns regarding the adequacy of the proposed landscaping in the above-referenced Site Plan Amendment Application(the"Application").Adequate landscaping is of particular importance to the Club due to the proximity of their respective improvements and related activities along and adjacent to the parties' shared property boundary. This is also true for the Enclave (the"Applicant") given their participation in prior applications of the Club before this Board. By way of background, and as this Board may recall, there were significant discussions between the Applicant and the Club during the proceedings before this Board for the Club's Golf Learning Center.These discussions resulted in specific requirements imposed on the Club with respect to its landscaping and buffer plan along its boundary with the Applicant. Accordingly, the Club engaged William Rutherford, a Landscape Architect, to ensure adequate screening will be provided as part of this Application. Pursuant to his review of the Planting Plan (Drawing L-1),I Mr. Rutherford has several comments: 1. The proposed Brodie Eastern Red Cedar and American Holly trees are slow-growing native specimens that will not provide adequate screening under the current plan. It will take many years,if not decades,for these trees to provide their intended screening. I Prepared by Angela Loffa,Landscape Architect,dated July 16,2025. WESTCHESTER : NEW YORK CITY HUDSON VALLEY CONNECTICUT 4898-1757-0168.v3 0 CUDDY + FEDER LLP , November 11,2025 Page 2 2. The proposed 8'O.C. (on center)spacing for these trees will leave significant gaps in the vegetative screening due to their anticipated width(approx.6%linear planting layout,and lack of additional tree plantings with staggered spacing. 3. Likewise,there will be gaps between the above-mentioned trees and several of the Leyland Cypress and Norway Spruce trees due to their anticipated widths (approx. 5-8% linear planting layout,and lack of additional tree plantings with staggered spacing. In addition to providing additional tree plantings with staggered spacing (i.e., offset), Mr. Rutherford recommends planting larger Brodie Eastern Red Cedar and Leyland Cypress trees,as 8'-tall trees are unlikely to provide adequate screening when first planted.As an alternative,the Applicant could provide faster-growing evergreen trees(e.g.,Norway Spruce)in place of several of the Brodie Eastern Red Cedar and American Holly trees where appropriate. It is also noted that the Applicant's Planting Plan does not comply with the Site Plan requirements found in Section 209-3C(2)(e) of the Village Code. Said provision requires Site Plans to identify "[t]he location and characteristics of the different areas of vegetation,including the identification of all individual trees 12 or more inches at breast height(`DBH'), protected trees of any size ... within areas of proposed disturbance, consistent with the provisions of Chapter 235[`Trees']."2 Further,the Planting Plan does not provide the information required under Chapter 235,which is incorporated by reference in Section 209-3C(2)(e).Section 235-9B states that"[a]ll Applicants for...site plan review, ...major landscaping or other development requiring tree removal shall be required to submit a tree preservation map."3 The Planting Plan does not clearly delineate the trees to be removed and/or replaced, nor does it include the requisite details of"the location, species,DBH and condition of all trees six inches DBH or greater and...the methods and practices to be used to provide protection from injury during construction for all trees to be preserved."4 We respectfully submit that the Applicant should provide a revised Planting Plan that complies with the aforementioned Code requirements before a decision is rendered on the Application.A visual comparison of the Planting Plan to the existing vegetation at the subject premises is enclosed for reference. 2 Emphasis added. 3 Section 235-2 defines "Tree Preservation Map" as a "plan of the property in question indicating the location,species,DBH and condition of all trees six inches DBH or greater and detailing the methods and practices to be used to provide protection from injury during construction for all trees to be preserved.The plan shall clearly identify all trees as being removed and to remain." 4Id. 4898-1757-0168A OCUDDY +FEDER LLP A November 11,2025 Page 3 We look forward to appearing before the Board to discuss these concerns at its meeting on November 13th. It is in the interest of all the parties to ensure that any landscaping amendments are consistent with the intent of the Enclave's prior approved landscaping plan for the subject premises and complementary to the Club's landscaping design, as approved by the Village and installed at the Club. Should the Planning Board or Village Staff have any questions with regard to the foregoing,please do not hesitate to contact me.Thank you in advance for your consideration. Respectfully submitted, Daniel Conant Enclosure. cc: Michal J.Nowak, Supt.of Public Works Blind Brook Club, Inc. William Rutherford 4898-1757-0168.v3 a• I N � 144 �►��,*ice ,I � � � , tow �[ Tara Orlando From: David Gelfarb <gelfarb@mosskalish.com> Sent: -Monday,October 6,2025 11:02 A'M To: Tara Orlando Cc: wpahna@plazarealtymgmt.com;Lauren IlC�Iahon;'Michal Nowak;Jennifer Gray Subject: RE:Village of Rye Brook Planning Board Meeting,Thursday,October 9,2025 @ 6:30 PSI Hi Tara: Good morning. Based on discussions with Michal Nowak and Jennifer Gray, Esq., applicant is requesting that this application be adjourned until the November, 2025 Planning Board meeting. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Thanks, David DAVID CIEL_FARZ,, ESQ Moss& Kalish, PLLC 122 East 42"d Street Suite 2100 New York, New York 10168 (212)867-4488 (Office) (917)817-8046 (Mobile) (212)983-5276(Fax) CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this e-mail is attorney privileged and confidential information. It is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient,you are notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, electronic storage or use of this communication is prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, attaching the original message, and delete the original message from your computer, and any network to which your computer is connected. Communications from our firm contain or incorporate federal tax advice. Under recently promulgated US Internal Revenue Service (IRS) standards, we are required to inform you that only formal, written tax opinions meeting IRS requirements may be relied upon by taxpayers for the purpose of avoiding tax-related penalties. Accordingly,this communication is not intended or written to be used,and cannot be used,for the purpose of avoiding tax-related penalties under the Internal Revenue Code. From:Tara Orlando<torlando@ryebrookny.gov> Sent: Friday, October 3, 2025 3:35 PM To: David Gelfarb<gelfarb@mosskalish.com> Cc:wpalma@plazarealtymgmt.com; Lauren McMahon<Imcmahon@langan.com> Subject:Village of Rye Brook Planning Board Meeting,Thursday, October 9, 2025 @ 6:30 PM Good afternoon, Your application for Kingfield HOA will be heard at the above mentioned meeting.The meeting will be held in-person at Village Hall. Someone must attend to represent the application. 1 Tara Orlando From: David Gelfarb <glfarb@mosskahsh.com> Sent: Tuesday,September 9,2025 6:37 PM To: Tara Orlando Cc: rzitt@kblaw.com;Jennifer Gray;Michal Nowak Subject: RE:Kingfield Lot Owners Association,Inc.September 11,2025 Planning Board Meeting Hi Tara: Good evening. We are the attorneys for Kingfield Lot Owners Association, Inc. ("Kingfield"). Kingfield requests that the public hearing on its application that is presently before the Planning Board be adjourned from the September 11, 2025 meeting to the October 9, 2025 meeting. Thank you for your attention to this matter and Kingfield looks forward to appearing before the Planning Board on October 9tn Thanks, David DAVID (r16L_FAR.g, ESQ Moss& Kalish, PLLC 122 East 42"d Street Suite 2100 New York, New York 10168 (212) 867-4488 (Office) (917)817-8046(Mobile) (212)983-5276 (Fax) CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this e-mail is attorney privileged and confidential information. It is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient,you are notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution,electronic storage or use of this communication is prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail,attaching the original message, and delete the original message from your computer, and any network to which your computer is connected. Communications from our firm contain or incorporate federal tax advice. Under recently promulgated US Internal Revenue Service (IRS) standards, we are required to inform you that only formal, written tax opinions meeting IRS requirements may be relied upon by taxpayers for the purpose of avoiding tax-related penalties. Accordingly,this communication is not intended or written to be used,and cannot be used,for the purpose of avoiding tax-related penalties under the Internal Revenue Code. 1 MOSS S KALISH , PLLC COUNSELLORS AT LAW 122 EAST 42ND STREET MARK L.KALISH NEW Y O R K, NY 1 016 8-0 0 9 8 NASSAU OFFICE DAVID B.GELFARB" ___ 500 OLD COUNTY,SUITE 208 GARDEN CITY,NY 11530 .IAMES$CHWARTZMAN TELEPHONE: (212) 867-4488 --- TELECOPIER: (212) 983-5276 writeese-mail: 'ALSO AOURTED IN NEW JERSEY E-MAIL: LAWYERS @ M O S S K A L I S H.C O M gelfarb@mosskalish.com September 2,2025 Honorable Chairman Robert Goodman D LS(C [E � V F and Members of the Village Planning BoardID Village of Rye Brook SEP - 2 2025 938 King Street Rye Brook,New York 10573 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK BUILDING DEPARTMENT Re: Kingfield Lot Owners Association, Inc. Application for Site Plan Amendment Rose Lane, Rye Brook,NY 10573 Parcel ID No. 129.25-1-1 Dear Honorable Chairman Goodman and Members of the Planning Board: We are the attorneys for the Kingfield Lot Owners Association,Inc. (the"Association"). I write in further support of the Association's application to amend the PUD site plan for the Kingfield residential development ("Kingfield" or the "Development"). The site plan was approved by the Board of Trustees on February 23, 2016, amended by the Board of Trustees on January 10,2017 and October 30,2017(the"2017 Resolution"),and further amended by the Board of Trustees on February 13, 2018 (following a Report and Recommendation by this Board dated February 8,2018) (the"2018 Resolution"). By way of review, the 2018 Resolution noted that Kingfield had 4,835 square feet of unused impervious surface coverage. The Association simply requests that the Village authorize a "swap"or"trade"of 4,835 square feet of(unused) impervious surface coverage from the common area of Kingfield to the homeowners for use in connection with their patios, decks, walkways or other impervious surface. As the materials that we have previously submitted address, there are 35 homes whose patios have been expanded, for a total expanded impervious surface of 3,613.47 square feet. Accordingly,if the Planning Board (the"Board")approves this application,there will still be Honorable Chairman Robert Goodman September 2,2025 Page 2 1,221.53 square feet of impervious surface available for those homeowners who have not expanded their patios (or other impervious surface).' As we address below, it is very unlikely, for various reasons, that there will be a significant number of homeowners requesting to expand their patios with impervious materials. We note that the 2018 Resolution set forth a limit on impervious surface to address stormwater impacts. The Association's application does not seek an increase in impervious surface and will not change stormwater impact. Thus, it is respectfully submitted that the Board should approve this application. The Association has carefully considered the comments, suggestions and concerns that members of the Board have offered during our initial presentation at the May 8, 2025 Board meeting and at the public hearing that was held at the June 12`''meeting and(continued at)the July 10' meetings. The Association appreciates the time and consideration that Board members and Village staff have given to this application to date. Although not legally required, the Association will establish a process to evaluate applications for the expansion of patios through the use of both impervious and,as we will address further below, permeable materials. At this time, the Association anticipates that its Board of Directors(the"Kingfield Board")will evaluate applications with guidance,to the extent necessary, from Management, counsel and the Association's engineers, Langan Engineering. Absolutely no expansion will be permitted without review by and approval by the Kingfield Board. The Kingfield Board is cognizant that, and will continue to explain to homeowners, that any homeowners seeking to expand their patios (or to "legalize" an expansion that has already occurred) will have to resolve any outstanding violations, pay application fees to the Village, submit building plans and obtain any required building permits. The Association will also establish a process for keeping track of the square footage of additional impervious surface that is allowed. At this point, we plan to have the Kingfield Board oversee it. Management and Langan Engineering will be engaged in this process on an as-needed basis. The Association will provide an annual written update to the Village on the amount of impervious space that has been added, and how much remains, from the 4,835 square feet remaining pursuant to the 2018 Resolution. The Kingfield Board is cognizant that homeowners seeking to expand their patios (or to "legalize"an expansion that has already occurred)will have to resolve any outstanding violations, pay application fees to the Village,submit building plans and obtain any required building permits. The Association understands the significance, particularly with respect to stormwater management,of not going beyond the impervious surface limitation that has been established.The ' We recognize that the 2018 Resolution refers to impervious surfaces such as decks and walkways.However,given that the only impervious square footage that has been added is with respect to patios,we will,in the interest of simplicity,refer to all impervious surfaces at issue as"patios" Honorable Chairman Robert Goodman September 2,2025 Page 3 Association intends to keep careful records of applications and authorizations in order to ensure that it stays within the limits approved by the Board. Moreover,the Kingfield Board is cognizant that homeowners seeking to expand their patios (or to "legalize" an expansion that has already occurred) will have to resolve any outstanding violations, pay application fees to the Village, submit building plans and obtain any required building permits. Standards to be Applied in Reviewing Patio Applications Although the standards to be applied by the Planning Board in reviewing this application are set forth in New York Village Law §7-725-a(4) ("Conditions attached to the approval of site plans"), Village Code ("Code") §209-4A through J ("Planning Board consideration in review") and Code§209-7A("[t]he approval authority shall decide whether to approve,modify,or deny the application for site plan approval based upon the factors listed in 2094A through J hereof.") ,the Association intends to establish a system for reviewing applications to enlarge patios that is fair and equitable. The Kingfield Board intends to apply certain standards in reviewing and granting applications for patio expansion.The Association anticipates that these standards will apply in the case of enlargements with impervious and pervious materials. These standards shall include a possible cap on the additional square footage to be allowed for a given patio and the impact on the community,including aesthetics. The Kingfield Board will consider compatibility, contextual relationship, proportion, rhythm, scale, colors and materials. Priority will be given to increases that relate favorably to the Development's planning, landscaping,topography and existing character. The Association further intends to require that the workmanship be equal to or exceed the quality of the existing patio. Another consideration to be considered is the impact on the privacy and normal use of neighboring properties. Materials to be Used for Expansion and Enlargement of Patios If, as and when Kingfield reaches the 4,835 square foot limit,the Kingfield Board will consider several options in addressing future requests for expansion of patios. These options can be broken down into two broad categories,namely the use of(i) permeable materials or(ii) impervious materials with stormwater runoff reduction techniques. 1. Permeable Materials One option is to require homeowners to use materials that do not add to the impervious surface,namely permeable pavers. Permeable pavers actively direct water back into the soil. Section 5.3.9 of the New York State Stormwater Management Design Manual(the "Design Manual"), entitled Porous Pavement(RR-9),provides in part as follows: Honorable Chairman Robert Goodman September 2, 2025 Page 4 Porous pavement is a broadly defined group of pervious surfaces that can be applied as an alternative to typical impervious surfaces for road, driveway, sidewalk, or plaza applications. These systems are designed to convey rainfall through the surface into an underlying reservoir that provides structural support, filters pollutants, temporarily stores runoff, and promotes infiltration. Porous pavements are designed to reduce the effective impervious area on a site; thereby reducing design volumes and peak discharge rates. These systems must be designed to support applicable loading, and carefully constructed and maintained to ensure long-term function. A copy of Section 5.3.9 is annexed hereto as Exhibit"A." The Association believes that a patio comprised (or in the case of enlargements, partially comprised)of permeable pavers can be just as aesthetically pleasing and functional as a"traditional paver"made of a concrete and sand mixture.A copy of pages from a brochure issued by Unilock, a leading supplier of permeable pavers,is annexed hereto as Exhibit"B."More information about permeable pavers is available at Permeable Pavers for Driveways,Patios,and Walkways I Unilock. (https://unilock.com/penneable-pavers/) While a detailed discussion of engineering matters is beyond the scope of this submission,the Association recognizes that the Stormwater Manual has certain requirements with respect to permeable pavers. In particular, a geotechnical (e.g. percolation) test may be required and that a "key consideration" (page 5-78), is that the "minimum infiltration rate of underlying soil is 0.50 inch/hr"). The Association believes that permeable pavers are a very feasible alternative to traditional non-permeable pavers and will work with the Village Engineer to ensure compliance with stormwater runoff requirements. The Association strongly believes that the use of permeable pavers is consistent with satisfying,to the extent reasonably feasible,the Board's concerns about fairness.Put simply,if no additional impervious square footage is being added,then there is less concern about any limitation on adding additional impervious surface. While we recognize that no process for allocating a limited amount of impervious square footage may meet everyone's standard of fairness,the use of permeable pavers ameliorates a great deal of the concern. There will no longer be a concern that only certain people will be able to expand their patios, or that those who acted first will have an unfair advantage over their neighbors. Instead, by using permeable pavers, any homeowner, including homeowners who move into Kingfield years in the future, can apply to expand their patio and will not be confronted by a limitation on impervious surface that they had nothing to do with. Put simply, if no additional impervious square footage is being added, then there is less concern about any limitation on adding additional impervious surface. 1I. Stormwater Reduction Technigues with Impervious Materials A. Tree Plantings Honorable Chairman Robert Goodman September 2,2025 Page 5 A potential option for homeowners who seek to expand their patios, but who want to use impervious materials, would be tree plantings. The idea would be that even if impervious pavers were used, the Stormwater Manual allows for tree plantings to be installed as a runoff reduction technique. Specifically, section 5.3.3 of the Stormwater Manual, entitled "Tree Planting/Tree Pit/Tree Trench(RR-3)"provides as follows: Tree plantings are existing or newly planted trees in a natural setting that can be applied as runoff reduction technique. A copy of section 5.3.3 of the Stormwater Manual is annexed hereto as Exhibit"C." Section 5.3.3.3.2 provides, in part, for a credit for impervious surface reduction where a tree has been planted, as follows: Area Reduction (Tree Planting) •Credit for impervious area reduction shall be the following: o Mature tree canopy less than 16 ft diameter: half the area of the tree canopy. o Mature tree canopy greater than or equal to 16 ft diameter: 100 SF per tree. In general, new trees would need to be planted no further than ten (10') feet from the edge of a patio. Each patio would need to be evaluated on a case by case basis to determine how many trees are required to be installed,the tree species to be allowed, etc. Moreover,trees should not be planted over or in close proximity to existing utilities. In the event that a homeowner seeking to increase the size of their patio wishes to use impervious materials and to incorporate tree plantings as a runoff reduction technique, the homeowner will be required to satisfy both the Kingfield Board and the Village that there will not be any net increase in runoff. B. Pea Gravel Diaphragm In the event a homeowner wanted to utilize impervious materials, and there was little or none of the 1,221 square feet available, another option would be a"Pea Gravel diaphragm." Langan Engineering details that a pea gravel diaphragm is a small gravel filled trench that acts as an inlet structure by redistributing concentrated flow to sheet flow. It is a pretreatment device that filters and settles sediment particles. They are commonly used in conjunction with other stormwater treatment practices. Langan Engineering's preliminary estimate is that a 1 foot wide by 1.5 feet deep trench should be adequate to capture the anticipated runoff from the additional impervious area represented by a single patio expansion. Annexed hereto as Exhibit "D" is Figure 6.20 (at page 6-55) from the Stormwater Manual, depicting a pea gravel diaphragm. Annexed hereto as Exhibit "E" is Figure 6.11 from the Honorable Chairman Robert Goodman September 2,2025 Page 6 Stormwater Manual, which depicts an infiltration trench (of which a pea gravel diaphragm is an integral component). Annexed hereto as Exhibit "F" is Table 6.14 from the Stormwater Manual, which sets forth certain design specifications applicable to pea gravel diaphragms.Lastly,annexed hereto as Exhibit"G"are photographs depicting pea gravel diaphragms. C. Modification of Stormwater Management Facilities A final option that the Association may consider, if there is little or no additional impervious surface remaining from the "swap," is to apply for a modification of the existing stormwater management facilities. Such an application would seek to expand the coverage of the existing stonmwater management facilities. At present, the Kingfield Board believes that it would be significantly more cost-effective to use the other options outlined above, namely pervious pavers, tree plantings and pea gravel diaphragms.Nonetheless, if the need arose,the Kingfield Board would be willing to consider this option with Langan Engineering. There is Significant Uncertainty Concerning Any Future Strong Demand to Enlarge Patios As noted above, the Association is very conscious of the Board's concerns about the fairness of any plans for allowing increased impervious coverage. To date, 35 homes have expanded their patios,which leaves 75 homes that have not undertaken such activity. However, the Association believes that many homes are unlikely to apply for expansion due to terrain, topography and other factors, or that if they do, the enlargement would be very small. Indeed, of the 35 homes that have expanded their patios, 8 have added less than 32 square feet of additional impervious surface. A review of drawings CS-100, CS-101 and CS-102, prepared by Langan Engineering and submitted to the Board as part of the Association's application, as well as a "walk-through" of Kingfield, indicates that it would simply be impractical for many of the remaining houses to enlarge their patios. Many homes simply have little remaining space to expand their patios. For others,the layout and topography of the homes and their plots is not conducive to expansion. For example, of the 11 houses on the west side of Rose Lane,only one [8 Rose Lane],has enlarged its patio(by 27 square feet). On the east side of Rose Lane, only one [3 Rose Lane], has enlarged its patio (by 14 square feet). The houses on the west side of Rose Lane back up to a fence. Their patios are"back to back" with the patios of the houses on the east side of Jasmine Lane. None of the 14 homes on the east side of Jasmine Lane have enlarged their patios. Given the proximity of the rear sides of these houses to each other, there will likely be concern about noise impacting neighbors if patios were to be enlarged. There are also stormwater management facilities between the homes, which is not conducive to enlargement. Honorable Chairman Robert Goodman September 2,2025 Page 7 Similarly,the houses on the west side of Jasmine Lane are surrounded by a large fence.The fence is very close to some of these houses,making it unfeasible to expand the patios. Meanwhile, homes on the periphery of Kingfield, and whose patios face away from other homes, such as on the east side of Lavender Lane,the south side of Primrose Lane,or on Honeysuckle Lane,are more likely to have expanded patios.Many such homes have already expanded their patios. We recognize that there has been concern expressed about sheds,because they can add impervious surface and do not require a building permit. The Association has no intent of allowing sheds.None have ever been requested. In conclusion,it is respectfully submitted that the Planning Board should approve the Association's application for a site plan amendment given that the amendment will have no adverse impact on stormwater runoff or any other adverse impacts. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. We look forward to further discussing this application with the Planning Board at its September 11, 2025 meeting. Respectfuulllly submitted, � `>- . A� , David B. Gelfarb cc: Robert Zitt,Esq. EXHIBIT A 5.3.9 Porous Pavement (RR-9) Porous pavement is a broadly defined group of pervious surfaces that can be applied as an alternative to typical impervious surfaces for road, driveway, sidewalk, or plaza applications. These systems are designed to convey rainfall through the surface into an underlying reservoir that provides structural support,filters pollutants, temporarily stores runoff, and promotes infiltration. Porous pavements are designed to reduce the effective impervious area on a site. thereby reducing design volumes and peak discharge rates.These systems must be designed to support applicable loading, and carefully constructed and maintained to ensure long-term function. 1. 3- MIN TOP COURSE POROUS ASPHALT PAVEMENT �+— 3" MIN BINDER COURSE POROUS ASPHALT PAVEMENT l--- -- ?�-- 1" MIN NO. 2 STONE CHOKER COURSE WASHED, NO FINES) 12" MIN NO. 4A STONE RESERVOIR (WASHED, NO FINES) DRAINAGE FILTER FABRIC 24' MIN SEPARATION TO SEASONAL HIGH WATER TABLE/BEDROCK ROAD,DRIVE,AND PARKING LOT WITHOUT UNDERDRAIN SECTION VIEW 3' MIN TOP COURSE POROUS ASPHALT PAVEMENT - /-1' MIN NO. 2 STONE CHOKER COURSE WASHED, NO FINES) " MIN NO. 4A STONE RESERVOIR -. (WASHED, NO FINES) DRAINAGE FILTER FABRIC 24' MIN SEPARATION TO SEASONAL HIGH WATER TABLE/BEDROCK PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY WITHOUT UNDERDRAIN SECTION VIEW 6' PVC PERFORATED OBSERVATION WELL / WITH LOCKABLE CAP SOLID FRAME AND COVER SET r 6' PVC PERFORATED OBSERVATION WELL IN CONCRETE COLLAR WITH LOCKABLE CAP —� SOLID FRAME AND COVER SET IN CONCRETE COLLAR I PER //_ O -- SECTION SI 0 PER I 10" MIN NO. 57 STONE 0 DESIGN --��•��-� DRAINAGE LAYER 0 — SECTION { (WASHED, ' 0 NO FINES) WOv MAX PONDING DEPTH / FOOT PLATE 24' MIN J 24' MIN SEPARATION TO 6- MIN SOLID SEPARATION TO SEASONAL HIGH HEADER PIPE SEASONAL HIGH WATER TABLE/BEDROCK 6' PERFORATED WATER TABLE/BEDROCK UNDERDRAIN SET -- 30' O.C. MAX 4 OBSERVATION WELL WITH UNDERDRAIN OBSERVATION WELL WITHOUT UNDERDRAIN SECTION VIEW �~ SECTION VIEW Figure 5.46 Porous Asphalt Pavement(RR-9) Chapter 5:Runoff Reduction Techniques 5-71 JOINT SPACING AND FILLER PER- MANUFACTURER RECOMMENDATIONS PAVER RESTRAINT PER POROUS PAVERS MANUFACTURER RECOMMENDATIONS 2" BEDDING COURSE PER MANUFACTURER RECOMMENDATIONS 1' MIN NO. 2 STONE CHOKER COURSE (WASHED, NO FINES) 8' MIN NO. 4A STONE RESERVOIR (WASHED, NO FINES) DRAINAGE FILTER FABRIC - ———————————-, 24' MIN SEPARATION TO SEASONAL HIGH WATER TABLE/BEDROCK POROUS PAVER WITHOUT UNDERDRAIN SECTION VIEW 4" MIN. POROUS CONCRETE--- CONCRETE THICKNESS AND REINFORCEMENT DESIGNED PER TRAFFIC LOADING - -- -- 1' MIN NO. 2 STONE CHOKER COURSE (WASHED, NO FINES) LEVEL 1 8" MIN NO. 4A STONE RESERVOIR (WASHED, NO FINES) I FVFI J 12" MIN NO. 4A STONE RESERVOIR (WASHED, NO FINES) I DRAINAGE FILTER FABRIC- ————————— 24' MIN SEPARATION TO SEASONAL HIGH WATER TABLE/BEDROCK - POROUS CONCRETE WITHOUT UNDERDRAIN 9-E-CTI -N VIEW ---- --— Figure 5.47 Porous Pavers &Concrete(RR-9) Chapter 5:Runoff Reduction Techniques 5-72 Design Variants Porous pavement systems can be broken into two general design variants: 1. Porous Pavement Systems=Level 1 Non-Vehicle Traffic • Designed to support light-duty, non-vehicle traffic only. • Filter layer is typically sized to accommodate only rainfall that falls directly on the surface of the system. • Generally, consist of porous pavers and flexible porous pavement. 2. Porous Pavement stems_-Level g lVehicle_Trafficl: • Designed to support heavy-duty structural load and/or accommodate storage of larger storm events. • Fitter layer must be sized to store the entire WQv for the tributary area and can be sized to accept runoff from adjacent impervious areas. Generally, consist of porous asphalt pavement, porous concrete, traffic-rated porous pavers, porous gravel with stabilization grid/cell, stabilized grass grid/cell and grass block pavers. 5.3.9.1 Feasibility • Porous pavements shall be used in low dust areas and areas with low vehicle traffic volume.The systems shall be designed with the capability of bearing the anticipated vehicle and traffic loads. • Porous pavements may be applied as practices for urban stormwater management(see Chapter 8). • Sand and other winter traction materials shall not be used on porous pavement systems. • Porous pavement systems shall not be used to treat stormwater hotspots. • In areas of known contamination, or if contamination is discovered during excavation, contaminant levels must be evaluated by a qualified professional and state remediation program to determine if infiltration is permitted. • Slope across the finished surface shall not exceed 10%. • Slope across the bottom of the stone reservoir shall not exceed 5%. Where surface slope exceeds 5%,the stone reservoir shall be stepped to meet this criteria and underdrains shall be used to distribute runoff through the reservoir evenly. • The contributing area to porous pavements shall not exceed 3 times the surface area of the porous system. • Porous pavements shall meet the separation requirements as listed in Table 5.17.Vertical separation shall be taken from the bottom of the stone drainage layer. Horizontal separation shall be taken from the closest side of the filter media. �-Table 5.17 Porous Pavement Minimum Separation RequiremeW�i-_ 31 Vertical Separation Horizontal Separation Structures Seasonal Structures With Design High Water Bedrock1,2 Without Foundation Water Supply Septics4 Variant Table1.2 Foundation Waterproofing Well/Reservoir System Waterproofing Level 1 loft Oft 2ft 2ft — 100ft 50ft Level 2 25 ft 1 o ft �— - 'Sound bedrock,fractured bedrock or karst geology as documented by on-site soil testing. 24 ft in sole source aquifers. 'Septic systems are inclusive of septic tanks,distribution boxes,and absorption fields. 'If underdrains are proposed,minimum setback shall be 100 ft. • Porous pavement systems shall not be used unless the underlying soils have an infiltration rate greater than or equal.to 0.50 inch/hr. as confirmed by required geotechnical testing (see Appendix D). Chapter 5:Runoff Reduction Techniques 5-73 • Where underlying soils have an infiltration rate less than 2 inch/hr, underdrains shall be provided. If underlying soils have an infiltration rate greater than or equal to 2 inch/hr, underdrains are not required. • If porous pavement systems are constructed in engineered fill soils,then the following criteria shall be met: In-situ/natural soil layer below the porous pavement system shall have an infiltration rate greater or equal to the engineered fill soils, as determined by geotechnical testing (Appendix D); Soils proposed for engineered fill shall be classified as suitable using Table 5.18 and Figure 5.48; o Soils proposed for engineered fill shall have a minimum infiltration rate of 0.50 inch/hr and a material gradation similar to the in-situ/natural soils,as determined by geotechnical testing, After placement of engineered fill, permeability testing (Appendix D) shall be performed to confirm the actual in place infiltration rate. If engineered fill material requirements are not met,the material shall be removed; and The required vertical separation shall be measured from the existing grade of in-situ/natural soil. Engineered fill soils shall not be used to meet separation requirements. Table 5.18 . ..i . . : r ,'* ,. by Soil Texture Soil Texture Class Hydrologic Soil Minimum Infiltration Rate guHabillty Group (inch/hr) Sand A 8.27 Loamy sand A 2.41 Suitable for engineered fill -- for infiltration practice Sandy loam B 1.02 design Loam B 0.52 Sift loam C 0.27 Sandy clay loam C 0.17 Clay loam D 0.09 Not suitable for Sift clay loam D 0.06 engineered fill for Sandy clay D 0.05 infiltration practice design Silty clay D 0.04 Clay D 0.02 Chapter 5:Runoff Reduction Techniques 5-74 too, 90 : ..� /� \ ry ; . J� 60 r \ '`�•p s� 5r► xdty�, # V Nundy —clay �.• 410) clay _ yh � 7 cloy loran cla loam, n )lr.k— sand y y y[clay c loam " 20/ 11 �, loam Ot \wndy - -loamR— ct 10 — �%loam \ - oamY - - sill.• 3' xand •sand• \ �, _ ` • Sand Separate.% Figure 5.48 USDA Soil Textural Classification • The following requirements shall be in place, during construction: At the time of installation, extremely high or low temperatures shall be avoided. System areas shall be clearly marked before any site work begins to avoid soil disturbance and compaction. Heavy equipment traffic shall be restricted from areas of existing or proposed porous pavements. Construction of upstream areas shall be completed, and adequate vegetative cover shall be established over the entire tributary pervious area, before draining to the porous pavement system. Subsurface area shall be excavated to the proposed depth of the porous pavement section. Existing subgrade shall not be compacted or subject to excessive construction equipment prior to placement of drainage filter fabric and stone reservoir.Where erosion of subgrade has caused accumulation of fine materials and/or surface ponding,this material shall be removed, and the underlying soils scarified to a minimum depth of 6 inches. Place drainage filter fabric, or acceptable alternative, and stone drainage layer, immediately after approval of subgrade preparation to prevent accumulation of debris or sediment. • To ensure proper management post-construction, the following activities shall be avoided: Application of sand during winter months. Only use plow or snow removal equipment that is suitable for the specific type of porous pavement. Do not place dumpsters on or immediately upgradient of the pavement surface. Do not store or place dirt, grit, mulch, sand, or other similar materials on or near the pavement surface. 5.3.9.2 Conveyance • Runoff shall be conveyed to the practice via sheet flow. • When designing porous pavement systems for treatment of adjacent areas,the stone reservoir shall be designed with additional capacity. Chapter 5:Runoff Reduction Techniques 5-75 5.3.9.3 Pretreatment • If pervious adjacent areas discharge to the porous pavement system, then pretreatment shall be provided by grass filter strip and minimum 24 inch wide by 12 inch deep pea gravel diaphragm for that area. Refer to Table 6.2 for pretreatment sizing criteria. 5.3.9.4 Treatment 5.3.9.4.1 Design Criteria • Depth of stone reservoir shall be designed to account for the total contributing area,traffic load, in-situ soil characteristics, as well as water quality volume and quantity control requirements. T�able 5.19 Porous Pavement Design Specifications Porous Asphalt Porous Concrete Porous Paver' Depth 3 inch min. 4 inch min. Per manufacturer specifications Portland Cement Type I or II Surface (ASTM C 150), No.8(ASTM 33), Layer' NYSDOT Approved Top A Cement Ratio 4:1 to 4.5:1 Per manufacturer Material Course Porous Asphalt Waatt Pavement Specification er/Cement Ratio 0.28-0.35 specifications Reinforcement designed per traffic loading Applicability Level 1: N/A N/A N/A Binder Level 2: Required --- — Course Depth 3 inch min. Material NYSDOT Approved Binder Course Porous Asphalt Pavement Specification Applicability N/A NIA Required Bedding Depth 2 inch min.or per manufacturer specifications Course Material Per manufacturer specifications Choker Depth 1 inch min. Course' Material NYSDOT No.2 stone,washed,no fines Level 1:8 inch min. 8 inch min. Stone Depth Level 2 12 inch min. See Section 5.3.9.4.2 See Section 5.3.9.4.2 Reservoir' - Material NYSDOT NoAA stone,washed, no fines Applicability Required when underdrain is provided Drainage Depth 10 inch min. Layer' Material AASHTO No. 57 stone,washed,no fines Drainage Materials Non-woven,polypropylene ne g with Size US#70 greater sieve(ASTM D4751)f(ASTM D4491) Filter Applicability Underlying infiltration rates greater than or equal to 0.50 inch/hr and less than 2.0 inch/hr Underdrain 6"perforated PVC or HDPE laid at 0.50%min. 30 ft max.O.C. Material Underdrain invert shall be set at or above the WQv peak water surface elevation. Observation Material 6 inch min.perforated vertical PVC or HDPE pipe,with lockable cap installed flush with the Well' surface. Footnotes: 'Required for all Design Variants 'Or acceptable alternatives,such as a 3 inch minimum layer of pea gravel 'Porous Paver specifications include proprietary grid and geocell structures filled with permeable material specified by the product manufacturer. Chapter 5:Runoff Reduction Techniques 5-76 5.3.9.4.2 Sizing Criteria First, calculate the minimum depth of the stone reservoir needed to store the WQv storm event. The calculated minimum depth shall be compared to the minimum reservoir depth in Table 5.19 and the higher value shall be used. Where underdrains are proposed,the invert of the underdrain shall be set at an elevation above the WQ, WQv dP Ap.m Where: Dp= Calculated minimum depth of stone reservoir(ft) WQ =Water Quality Volume(cf) Ap= Surface area of porous pavement(sf) m = Porosity(assume 0.40) Next calculate the required total length of underdrain piping (LT),then calculate the required number of underdrains(N), rounding up to the nearest whole number: _AP LT S P N L _Lr U Where. Sp=spacing between underdrain pipes(ft on-center) (max. 30 ft) Lu=design length of underdrain pipe(ft) Chapter 5:Runoff Reduction Techniques 5.77 Fact Sheet: Porous Pavement (RR-9) Description:A broadly defined group of pervious surfaces that can be applied as an alternative to typical impervious surfaces for road, driveway, sidewalk, or plaza applications. Designed to convey rainfall through the surface into an underlying reservoir that provides structural support,filters pollutants, temporarily stores runoff, and promotes infiltration. FEASIBILITY STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SUITABILITY • Use in low dust areas and area with low traffic volume Water Quality • Shall be designed with the capability of bearing the anticipated vehicle Channel Protection and traffic loads • Sand and winter traction materials shall not be used Overbank Flood Protection • Maximum slope across the finished surface is 10% Extreme Flood Protection • Maximum slope across the bottom of the stone reservoir is 5% Runoff Reduction • Where surface slope exceeds 5%,the stone reservoir shall be stepped with underdrains Treatment of Hotspots • Minimum separation to bedrock/high water table is 2 ft Linear Applications • Minimum infiltration rate of underlying soil is 0.50 inch/hr ✓suitable for this practice • Where underlying soils have an infiltration rate less than 2 inch/hr underdrains shall be provided IMPLEMENTATION CONSIDERATIONS • Heavy equipment shall be restricted from area before,during and after © Capital Cost construction • Contributing area to porous pavements shall not exceed 3 times the © Maintenance Burden surface area of the porous system O Safety CONVEYANCE ak Landscaping • Runoff shall enter practice through sheet flow L= ow M=Moderate H=High • When designing systems for treatment of adjacent areas,the stone =L Not Applicable reservoir shall be designed with additional capacity PRETREATMENT POLLUTANT REMOVAL(See Table 10.4) • If pervious adjacent areas discharge to the system,a grass filter strip and 10 Phosphorus minimum 24 inch wide by 12 inch deep pea gravel diaphragm shall be provided Nitrogen TREATMENT 10 Metals • Depth of stone reservoir shall be designed to account for the total , Pathogens contributing area,traffic load,in-situ soil characteristics and WQv and quantity control requirements E. Total Suspended Solids • System shall be designed to ensure the peak water surface elevation for G=Good F=Fair P=Poor the 10-year,24-hr design storm does not rise above the stone reservoir RUNOFF REDUCTION CREDIT • Where underdrains are provided,the invert of the underdrain shall be set at an elevation above the required WQv storage • 100%(40%)of the runoff reduction volume provided by this practice without underdrains (with underdrains) Chapter 5:Runoff Reduction Techniques 5.78 EXHIBIT B �f 1 C . Permeable Unilock introduced the first permeable paver to North America in 1991.Long used to manage water in commercial projects,in recent years,increased storm events and residential flooding have motivated more and more homeowners to install permeable pavers in their own projects. At first glance, permeable pavers look similar to traditional pavers.The difference lies in the width of the joint between units,the material used to fill the joints,and the base upon which the pavers are installed.Widerjoints, permeable joint material -� and an open graded base design all work together to direct water through the surface and into the subsoil below,instead of flowing off the surface and into overburdened storm sewer systems. Special materials are used in thejoints and in the permeable base below,to encourage water to flow through. Some homeowners install rainwater collection systems underneath their paver projects to supply water to in-groundsprinkler systems n 0 0 X My ti a y.x Y U O L W J r I Permeable Paver Benefits Keep an eye out for our permeable icon t.01 Reduced Flooding throughout ourproduct pages. Storm sewers are less likely to overflow when more rainwater flows through the pavement surface. While all segmental paving can be Improved Filtration permeable to some degree,these products � Road salts,pesticides,oil and other harmful feature special spacer bars that promote pollutants are naturally filtered through a permeable exceptional flow-through. system before they reach rivers and lakes. ECO-HEX' Increased Square Footage % Installing a permeable driveway can enable ECO-PROMENADE- homeowners who live in regions where the ratio of impervious lot coverage is restricted,to install new ECO-PRIORA"PREMIER landscape features such as a pool. NORDIC COBBLE- i Safety Decreased puddling on the surface of permeable THORNBURY SMOOTH pavement will reduce ice build-up in winter. TRIBECA COBBLE" Long-term Savings Rainwater ccllection systems beneath pavers can TREO SMOOTH' reduce the expense of water used for irrigation and may be eligible for tax credits and subsidies. TOWN HALL 60 ENDURACCLOR- O EasyCleari o Factory sealed for ' Integral stain resistance ® / Z Q m F Umbriano- 80mm Exclusive to JNILOCK SUMMER WHEAT WINTER MARVEL 3 UNIT RANDOM BUNDLE' DRIVE FRIENDLY I Large Rectangle 14x21x31/t 360 x 540 x 80mm — Small Rectangle Square 7x14x3'/e" 14x14x3�/e" 180 x 360 x 80mm 360 x 360 x 80mm 4 x 12' PERMEABLE DRIVE FRIENDLY — — 37/9 x 117/a x 3'/e Available in French Grey,Winter Marvel and Midnight Sky only. 100 x 300 x 80mm See previous page for swatches. See page 119 for additional finishes. 146 'Lead time required. ENDURACCLOR" 0 0 0 W Treo` Smooth ' a I ALMOND GROVE SLATE GRANITE FUSION(STEEL MOUNTAIN) V FOSSIL WALNUT 3 UNIT RANDOM BUNDLE PERMEABLE DRIVE FRIENDLY Large Rectangle Square Small Rectangle 91/4 x 131/4 x 23A" 91/4 x 91/4 x 21/e 45/s x 9%x 23/e' 233 x 349.5 x 60mm 233x233x60mm 116.5x233x60mm SMALL RECTANGLE SOLD SEPARATELY Ii 46/a x 9'/4 x 21/e ti w ; 116.5 x 233 x 60mm Almond Grove Granite Fusion Fossil Dark Charcoal 142 (Steel Mountain) EXHIBIT C 5.3.3 Tree Planting/Tree Pit/Tree Trench (RR-3) Tree plantings are existing or newly planted trees in a natural setting that can be applied as a runoff reduction technique for Area Reduction. REFER TO APPENDIX H FOR TREE SPECIES. 2—INCH MIN CALIPER OR 6—FOOT MIN HEIGHT FOR NEW TREE PLANTINGS 4—INCH MIN CALIPER OR 6—FOOT MIN HEIGHT FOR EXISTING TREES 3" MIN SHREDDED HARDW000 MULCH CONTRIBUTING IMPERVIOUS rFINISHED AREA GRADE LAWN — FILTER MEDIA 3' r MIN DEPTH OR ROOT BALL DEPTH, WHICHEVER IS GREATER 11 5' MIN 10' MAX FOR NEW TREE PLANTINGS 20' MAX TO CANOPY FOR EXISTING TREES SHEET FLOW FROM ASPHALT PAVEMENT OR THROUGH CURB DROP PROFILE VIEW Figure 5.35 Tree Planting (RR-3) Chapter 5:Runoff Reduction Techniques 5.37 Tree pits refer to individually planted trees in contained areas, such as street trees within sidewalks or curbed islands,that can be applied as a runoff reduction technique for Volume Reduction. CURB OR ANCHORED FRAME AT I 5 MIN PERIMETER OF TREE PIT TO - — — SUPPORT TREE GRATE 5' MIN PLAN VIEW 3" MIN SH03- 6"CURB OR ANCHORED FRAME AT PERIMETER OF HARDWOOD TREE PIT TO SUPPORT TREE GRATE MIN PERFORATED UNDERDRAIN { (IF REQUIRED) FILTER MEDIA 36" MIN DEPTH 6" MIN NO. 57 STONE DRAINAGE LAYER 1 1 (WASHED, NO FINES) 2' MIN DEPTH— 1 WHERE UNDERDRAIN IS REQUIRED, PROVIDE ROOT BARRIER 10" MIN NO. 57 STONE DRAINAGE LAYER DRAINAGE (WASHED, NO FINES) FILTER FABRIC PROFILE VIEW 24" MIN SEPARATION TO SEASONAL HIGH WATER TABLE/BEDROCK REFER TO APPENDIX H--, SUGGESTED PLANT LIST CURB OR ANCHORED FRAME AT PERIMETER 3" MIN SHREDDED OF TREE PIT TO SUPPORT TREE GRATE HARDWOOD MULCH /—TREE GRATE FILTER MEDIA 36" MIN DEPTH r 1 1 { 1 1 DRAINAGE FILTER FABRIC ----------�---��" SECTION A-A VIEW 6" MIN PERFORATED UNDERDRAIN (IF REQUIRED) TRANSITION TO SOLID PIPE BEYOND LIMITS OF TREE PIT (TYP) Figure 5.36 Tree Pit(RR-3) Chapter 5:Runoff Reduction Techniques 648 Tree trenches are linearly planted trees along an impervious surface, such as roads or sidewalks,that capture surface flow and are connected by an underground stone reservoir with perforated pipe to maximize infiltration for credit as a runoff reduction technique for Volume Reduction.Tree trenches can support surface or subsurface flow. 12- MIN PERFORATED UM17 OF SUBSURFACE CLEAN OUT INFILTRATION PIPE STORAGE MEDIA A -- - j-- ----- --- - ---- ----- - ------------------- A J CATCH BASIN INLET PLAN VIEW — 10, O.C. MIN. - - I REFER TO APPENDIX H SUGGESTED PLANT UST CATCH BASIN INLET 3' MIN SHREDDED CLEAN OUT HARDWOOD MULCH FILTER MEDIA 36" MIN DEPTH ------ -------------- — 2' MIN NO. 2 Q STONE DRAINAGE ---------- .-------4- LAYER (WASHED, ROOT BARRIER — NO FINES) DRAINAGE FILTER FABRIC 2' DEPTH 12` MIN PERFORATED 24` MIN SEPARATION TO INFILTRATION PIPE SEASONAL HIGH STRUCTURAL SOIL OR PROPRIETARY SOIL CELL PRODUCT CAPABLE OF PROFILE VIEW WATER TABLE/BEDROCK SUPPORTING WALKING SURFACE ABOVE AND TREE ROOT GROWTH (TYP) 3" MIN SHREDDED HARDWOOD CLEAN OUT FILTER MEDIA j 36" MIN DEPTH 1------— ---+ 24` MIN NO. 2 STONE DRAINAGE LAYER DRAINAGE FILTER FABRIC- i (WASHED, NO FINES) 12" MIN INFILTRATION PIPE' `'---------- 24" MIN _ SEPARATION TO -- SEASONAL HIGH SECTION A-A VIEW WATER TABLE/BEDROCK Figure 5.37 Tree Trench Subsurface Flow(RR-3) Chapter 5:Runoff Reduction Techniques 5-39 DOME OR INLET /-SI DEWALK CURBED TREE 12" MIN INFILTRATION PIPE 1 OVERFLOW GRATE ` CURB INLET TRENCH ENCLOSURE 1 (3" MIN WIDTH) 1 1�, — f -MU7I1 TITFI"Tun-r[CC STABIUZED INLET TRENCH DRAIN mmmplm STABILIZED PRETREATMENT A PLAN VIEW (T�) OPTION 1: 10' O.C. MIN. DROP CURB ABION BASKET INLET DOME OR INLET OVERFLOW GRATE 3" MIN SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH / FILTER MEDIA I 36" MIN DEPTH -------"— 24" MIN NO. 2 STONE Ln .......o........ ... o...o..........o.......�—.1. DRAINAGE LAYER �. ---- - (WASHED. NO FINES) 12' MIN INFILTRATION PIPE _ 24' MIN SEPARATION TO PROFILE VIEW SEASONAL HIGH WATER TABLE/BEDROCK TRENCH DRAIN DROD CURB INLET ROADWAY STABILIZED PRETREATMENT OPTION 1: GABION BASKET 1-- 1 DRAINAGE FILTER FABRIC SECTION A-A VIEW Figure 5.38 Tree Trench Surface Flow(RR-3) Chapter 5:Runoff Reduction Techniques 5.40 6.3.3.1 Feasibility • Tree species selection shall take overhead and underground utilities into consideration,where applicable. • Ideally,the tree root ball will be placed on native subsoil to prevent sinking. In scenarios requiring filter media to be placed below the root ball, it is recommended that media be hand tamped in 6-inch lifts based on the size of the root ball. Consultation with a Landscape Architect is recommended under these scenarios. • Tree pits and tree trenches may be applied as practices for urban stormwater management(see Chapter 8). • Conserved existing trees shall be non-invasive, healthy trees with a root system that will not be impacted by the proposed development. • Tree pits with more than one tree per pit shall have underlying soils with an infiltration rate greater than or equal to 0.50 inch/hr,as confirmed by required geotechnical testing (see Appendix D), unless underdrains are provided. • Tree trenches shall not be used unless the underlying soils have an infiltration rate greater than or equal to 0.50 inch/hr, as confirmed by required geotechnical testing (see Appendix D). • Tree trenches and tree pits with more than one tree per pit shall have a 2 ft min. separation to the seasonal high water table and bedrock, including sound bedrock, fractured bedrock or karst geology. • Tree trenches,tree pits and tree plantings shall not be used to treat stormwater hotspots. • In areas of known contamination, or if contamination is discovered during excavation, contaminant levels must be evaluated by a qualified professional and state remediation program to determine if infiltration is permitted. • Tree plantings are not applicable if credit for another area reduction practice is already being taken for the same area. • Tree pits designed adjacent to public or private roadways shall have a maximum spacing of 30 ft on center. • Tree trenches shall meet the separation requirements as listed in Table 5.8.Vertical separation shall be taken from the bottom of the stone drainage layer. Horizontal separation shall be taken from the closest side of the filter media. Vertical Separation Horizontal Separation Structures Structures With Design Seasonal High gedrockt� Without Foundation Water Supply Septic Variant Water Table1,2 Foundation Waterproofing" Well/Reservoir System',' Waterproofing Tree Trench 2 ft 2 ft loft O ft 100 ft 50 ft 'Sound bedrock,fractured bedrock or Karst geology as documented by on-site soil testing. 14 ft in sole source aquifers. 'Septic systems are inclusive of distribution boxes and absorption fields. `Separation requirements shown are specific to the soil media.Trees shall be appropriately set back from structures. 'if underdrains are proposed,minimum setback shall be 100 ft. 5.3.3.2 Conveyance • Stormwater runoff shall be intercepted near the source and conveyed to the practice as sheet flow or concentrated flow with a flow dissipater upon entrance into the practice. • Runoff from adjacent building roofs can be captured and directed into tree trenches. Roof drains shall discharge at the surface of the tree trench or connect to a storm sewer structure for flow dissipation, prior to entering the tree trench. Direct connections to the subsurface infiltration pipe are not permitted. Adequate pretreatment shall be provided. • Tree pit underdrain systems shall be designed to create an internal water storage using one of the following methods: Chapter 5:Runoff Reduction Techniques 5-41 • Provide an upturned elbow, set 10 inches above the bottom of practice(Refer to Appendix C), • Set the outlet pipe invert, at the outlet control structure, 10 inches above the bottom of practice; or • Increase the drainage layer depth to provide 8 inches of stone below the underdrain. • Tree trenches shall be equipped with a subsurface infiltration reservoir, below the soil media, consisting of a 12 inch minimum perforated pipe(infiltration pipe) embedded within a stone drainage layer.The stone drainage layer shall be extended a minimum of 12 inches on all sides of the infiltration pipe. Alternatively, approved proprietary underground infiltration systems, meeting the design criteria in Section 6.3, may be used in place of the infiltration pipe. • Tree trenches shall have a subsurface emergency overflow pipe within an outlet control structure and the invert shall be set at or above the top of the infiltration pipe. 5.3.3.3 Treatment 5.3.3.3.1 Design Criteria • Flush curbs shall only be used around tree pits and tree trenches if pedestrian protection fencing is installed around the perimeter of the practice. • For tree pits and tree trenches, where the open surface area does not meet the filter media minimum width or length requirements,the filter media shall extend to meet the minimum dimensions beneath the adjacent hardscape.The portion of the filter media that extends beneath hardscape surfaces shall be substituted with a structural filter media meeting the requirements in Table 5.9. • Tree plantings, pits and trenches shall meet the following design requirements: -4-Table 5,9 Design Criteria for,Tre6-Plantings,Pits irfd Trenches 7 Design Criteria Tree Trenches Tree Pits Tree Plantings Maximum Slope of 10% Contributing Area Tree Species Species shall be chosen from Chapter 11 or a local list of native species Minimum Size-New Deciduous trees:2-inch caliper Trees Evergreen trees:6 ft. height Minimum Size- Deciduous trees:2-inch caliper Existing Trees Evergreen trees:6 ft. height Minimum Tree Spacing 10 ft.O.C. N/A N/A Maximum Horizontal Separation from loft Contributing Impervious Area-New Trees Maximum Horizontal Separation from Canopy within 20 ft Contributing Impervious Area-Existing Trees Chapter 5:Runoff Reduction Techniques 542 • Tree pits and Tree Trenches shall consist of the following design specifications: = r Tree Trenches Tme Plts Tree Planting Ponding' Depth 6 inch max.below lowest inlet Surface Depth 3 inch min.for new plantings Layer' Material Shredded Hardwood Mulch Applicability As Required N/A Structural Depth Per Manufacturer N/A Filter Media CU-Structural Soil®or demonstrated equivalent; or Material Modular soil cell system infilled with filter media Depth 36 inches min. Width 5 ft min. Filter Media' Length Determined by available space 5 ft min. ASTM C-33 Sand:60%-75% Material TopsoiR 25%-40% Common planting soil Applicability Required Required N/A 6 inch min.without Drainage Depth 24 inch min. underdrain N/A Layer 10 inch min.with underdrain Material No.2 stone,washed,no fines AASHTO No.57 stone, N/A washed, no fines Applicability Required Required N/A Drainage Filter Fabric Materia12 Non-woven, polypropylene geotextile with flow rate greater than 125 gpm/sf(ASTM D4491)and Apparent Opening Size US#70 sieve(ASTM D4751) Infiltration Applicability Required N/A N/A Pipe Material 12"min.perforated PVC or HDPE laid level or approved underground proprietary practice Applicability N/A As Required N/A Underdrain Material 6"perforated PVC or HDPE laid at 0.5%slope min.at 30 ft max.O.C. Footnotes: 'Required for all Design Variants 20r acceptable alternatives,such as a 3 inch minimum layer of pea gravel 'Topsoil shall conform to NYSDOT Standard Specification 713-01 for Roadside Mix or Specialty Planting Mix. Construction Requirements • Heavy equipment traffic must be limited in the vicinity of both existing and proposed tree planting areas. • Where existing trees are proposed as tree plantings, the design development and construction process must: Inventory existing trees on-site; Identify trees to be protected; Protect the identified trees and surrounding soils during construction by limiting clearing,grading and compaction within the drip line of the canopy;and Protect and maintain identified trees post-construction. Chapter 5:Runoff Reduction Techniques 5-43 6.3.3.3.2 Sizing Criteria Area Reduction (Tree Planting) • Credit for impervious area reduction shall be the following: Mature tree canopy less than 16 ft diameter: half the area of the tree canopy. Mature tree canopy greater than or equal to 16 ft diameter: 100 SF per tree. • When computing the required water quality volume to a given design point, subtract the impervious area contributing by sheet flow, to an existing or new tree, from the total contributing impervious area. • Reduced areas are not deducted when calculating quantity controls for larger storms. Volume Reduction (Tree PiUTree Trench) • Depth of stone reservoir shall be designed to account for the total tributary area, in-situ soil characteristics, as well as water quality volume and quantity control requirements. Systems shall be designed to ensure that the peak water surface elevation for the 10-year, 24-hr design storm does not overtop the system and shall safely convey runoff from greater storm events. • The depth of soil media shall be sized, based on the principles of Darcy's Law,to treat the WQv for the surface discharge tributary to each tree pit/trench. The filter area shall be sized based on the principles of Darcy's Law. Calculate the minimum bottom area. (WQ�)(df) Af _ (k)(hf+df)(tf) Where: Af=Filter area(sf) WQ�=Water Quality Volume(cf) df= Depth of filter(ft) k= Permeability flow rate of filter media(1 ft/day) hf=Average height of ponding (ft) (0.5 ft max.) tt= Maximum filter bed drain time(2 days) 5.3.3.4 Landscaping • For planting guidance for stormwater management facilities, refer to Chapter 11. • Permanent vegetative cover shall achieve 80% uniform density established over the entire contributing pervious area, before runoff is directed into the facility. Chapter 5:Runoff Reduction Techniques 5-44 Fact Sheet: Tree Planting/Tree Pit/Tree Trench (RR-3) Description: Tree planting is an area reduction practice using existing or newly planted trees. Tree pits are a volume reduction practice using trees planted in contained areas. Key Considerations FEASIBILITY STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SUITABILITY • Tree plantings are not applicable if credit for another area reduction Water Quality practice is already being taken for the same area • • Trees shall be non-invasive and not be disturbed during construction Channel Protection • Tree pits shall have underlying soils with an infiltrate greater than or equal • Overbank Flood Protection to 0.50 inch/hr, unless underdrains are provided • Extreme Flood Protection • Tree trenches shall have underlying soils with an infiltration rate greater than or equal to 0.50 inch/hr O Runoff Reduction • Tree trenches and tree pits shall have a 2 ft min.separation to the • Treatment of Hotspots seasonal high water table and bedrock • Overhead clearance shall be taken into consideration when selecting tree Linear Applications species ✓suitable for this practice CONVEYANCE IMPLEMENTATION CONSIDERATIONS • Tree pit underdrain systems shall be designed to create an internal water storage W Capital Cost • Tree trenches shall be equipped with a subsurface infiltration reservoir © Maintenance Burden • Stormwater runoff shall be intercepted near the source and conveyed to O the practice as sheet flow Safety Risk TREATMENT a Landscaping • The maximum slope of the contributing area is 10% L=Low M=Moderate H=High • The maximum horizontal separation from the contributing impervious area NA=Not Applicable is 10 ft(new trees)or within 20 ft of the canopy(existing trees) • Drainage fitter fabric shall separate and wrap the soil media and stone POLLUTANT REMOVAL(See Table 10.4) drainage layer of tree trenches a Phosphorus • For area reduction subtract the total area contributing by sheet flow to an O existing or new tree from the total area when computing WQv Nitrogen • For volume reduction,systems should ensure that the peak water surface O Metals elevation for the 10-year,24-hr design storm does not overtop the system iD Pathogens M Total Suspended Solids G=Good F=Fair P=Poor RUNOFF REDUCTION CREDIT • 100%area reduction towards RRv(plantings) • 100%RRv provided(trenches and pits) • 40%RRv provided(tree pits with underdrains) Chapter 5:Runoff Reduction Techniques 5-45 EXHIBIT D Filtration Bioretention (F-5) Filtration bioretention areas are shallow stormwater control that utilize vegetation and engineered filter media to capture and treat stormwater runoff,then return it to the conveyance system through a perforated underdrain system. OVERFLOW STRUCTURES +r;+s ••S � F i PRETREATMENT— �.� Y,a^ ^t r, •' + �-,+•�'- GRASS FILTER STRIP - ' '.43.: r�, is ?. n.g1 6` MIN PVC .4{,� +.r�•• h+�'. �+/�j PERFORATED r• ;9,+� +%s'' �+!.?. UNDERDRAIN PEA GRAVEL DIAPHRAGM 18" MIN WIDTH I;� 7 eL 24" MIN DEPTHi�+n' 'tea...>± `k24,+ 14, 5-i'4 !'1a fit,, ICJ• � •�• .^ is'4.,.:r .( �;,,. r�tj " �r•�•4•�•I1�t�Lrb�i f1Jr-7�•J+1�Jt 1,j�.':>!:.. _ - __._ --�.. `'fir yi'�,'f-'•.':x.'•+_`a •A t'..`-e t._-!" -OUTLET PIPE PLAN VIEW LARGER STORM OVERFLOW STRUCTURE, MAX PONDING PRETREATMENT GRASS FILTER STRIP GRATE INLET SET AT WOV DEPTH-18- PONDING DEPTH WATER QUALITY PAVEMENT— MAX PONDING EPTH-12" PRETREATMENT GRAVEL FILTER DIAPHRAGM 'MEDIAF2.5'-4' 3- MIN SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH 10' MIN NO 57 STONE DRAINAGE LAYER (WASHED, NO FINES) _ DRAINAGE FILTER FABRIC UNDISTURBED EARTH 24" MIN OUTLET PIPE BEYOND SEPARATION TO SEASONAL 6" MIN PVC PERFORATED UNDERDRAIN HIGH WATER TABLE/ BEDROCK SECTION A-A VIEW Figure 6.20 Filtration Bioretention (F-5) Chapter 6:Standard Stormwater Management Practices 6-55 EXHIBIT E Infiltration Trench (1-1) Infiltration trenches are excavated trenches filled with stone, designed to capture and temporarily store runoff in the stone reservoir,where it exfiltrates into the surrounding native soils. COMPACTED EARTHEN BERM A t A LENGTH OVERFLOW AS Q WEIR, WIDTH REQUIRED VARIES i PRETREATMENT- GRASS FILTER STRIP OBSERVATION WELL WITH LOCKABLE CAP PLAN VIEW PRETREATMENT GRASS FILTER STRIP 1 ALTERNATIVE SURFACE 6" PVC PERFORATED TREATMENT WITH OBSERVATION WELL CONTRIBUTING ; TOPSOIL AND LAWN COMPACTED IMPERVIOUS SURFACE EARTHEN BERM y —_-- 0[!—t, 0 f! T 0{, i 1 0' I r 4" PEA GRAVEL I 0 1 0 1 DRAINAGE FILTER I 0 I FABRIC 0 I 4' .0" NO. 2 STONE RESERVOIR 1 00 1 MAX (WASHED, NO FINES) I 0 t 1 1 0 I 1 0 1 L----�__j- FOOT PLATE 24" MIN SEPARATION TO SEASONAL HIGH WATER TABLE/BEDROCK .V 1 SECTION A-A VIEW Figure 6.11 Infiltration Trench(1-1) Chapter 6:Standard Stormwater Management Practices 6-36 EXHIBIT F Table 6.14 Stormwater Filtering Design Specifications F-1 F-2 F-3 F4 F-5 F-6 Applicability N/A N/A N/A As Required As Required Required Pea Gravel Diaphragm Depth 24 inch min. --- --- Material ASTM D448 No.6 Stone,Porosity=32% Applicability Required Required Required I Required I Required N/A Ponding Depth 12 inch max.(WOv) 18 inch max.(Extreme Flood) Applicability Optional Required ---WA Required Required N/A Depth — - 3 Inch min. Choker Course: Surface Layer AASHTO Shredded Hardwood Mulch Material Topsoil No.57 N/A or Non-Invasive Living N/A stone, Mulch washed, no fines Depth 18-24 inch 12-24 inch 30-48 inch 12 inch min. Standard ASTM C-33 Sand:60%-75% Filter Media' Material Topsoit4:25%-40% Blend of Stone, - Sand:ASTM C-33 concrete sand ASTM C-33 Sand:85%-95% Perlite,Dolomite, Enhanced Topsoil/Organics:5%-15% Gypsum2 Material' P-Index: 12 to 30 Drainage Depth _ 10 inch 6 inch 10 inch z14 inch Layer' Material AASHTO No.57 stone,washed,no fines Applicability Required I Required I Required I N/A I Required Required Underdrain 6"perforated PVC or HDPE laid at 0%slope at 30 ft max.O.C.with internal water storage; Material in all other cases,6"perforated PVC or HDPE laid at 0.5%slope min.at 30 ft max.O.C. Applicability Required I Required Required Required Required Required Drainage Filter Fabric Materials Non-woven,polypropylene geotextile with flow rate greater than 125 gpm/sf(ASTM D4491) and Apparent Opening Size US#70 sieve(ASTM D4751) Applicability As Required N/A I NIA I NIA As Required As Required Impermeable 12-24 inch of clay soil(min.50%passing#200 sieve and max.permeability 1 x 105 Liner Material cm/sec) or 40 mil HDPE geomembrane Slope 15%max. Maintenance Width 12 ft.min. Access' Material Able to withstand loading from maintenance equipment and vehicles Footnotes: 'Required for all Design Variants 2Design Variant F-6: • Stone:No.89,no recycled material,non-limestone material mineral aggregate • Periite:Agricultural grade,free of toxic materials(0-30%passing No.18 Sieve,0-10%passing No.30 Sieve)1 cy/3 cy of stone • Dolomite:CaMg(CO3)2(calcium magnesium carbonate)Agricultural grade,free of toxic materials(100%passing No.8 Sieve,0% passing No.16 Sieve)10 lbs/cy perlite • Gypsum:CaSO4.2112O(hydrated calcium sulfate).Non-calcined,agricultural grade,free of toxic materials(100%passing No.8 Sieve, 0%passing No.16 Sieve)1.5 Ib/cy perlite 'Enhanced Filter Media shall be used within watersheds requiring enhanced phosphorus removal.Refer to Chapter 4 for impaired watershed information. 'Topsoil shall conform to NYSDOT Standard Specification 713-01 for Roadside Mix or Specialty Planting Mix. 'For Designs F-4 and F-5,the organic component shall not consist of compost. 'Or acceptable alternatives,such as a 3 inch minimum layer of pea gravel Chapter 6:Standard Stormwater Management Practices 6.61 Table 6.14 Stormwater Filtering Design Specifications F-1 F-2 F-3 F-4 F-5 F-6 Applicability N/A N/A N/A As Required As Required Required Pea Gravel Depth 24 inch min. Diaphragm -- - Material ASTM D448 No.6 Stone,Porosity=32% Applicability Required Required Required Required I Required N/A Ponding 12 inch max.(WQv) Depth 18 inch max.(Extreme Flood) Applicability Optional Required N/A Required I' Required NIA Depth 3 inch min. Choker Course: Surface Layer AASHTO Shredded Hardwood Mulch Material Topsoil No,57 N/A or Non-Invasive Living N/A stone, Mulch washed, no fines Depth 18-24 inch 12-24 inch 30-48 inch 12 inch min. Standard ASTM C-33 Sand:60%-75% Filter Media' Material Topsoit4:25%-40% Blend of Stone, Sand:ASTM C-33 concrete sand ASTM C-33 Sand:85%-95% Perlite,Dolomite, Enhanced Topsoil/Organics:5%-15% Gypsum2 Material' P-Index: 12 to 30 Drainage Depth _ _ 10 inch 6 inch I 10 inch 214 inch Layer' Material AASHTO No.57 stone,washed,no fines Applicability Required I Required I Required N/A j Required Required Underdrain 6"perforated PVC or HDPE laid at 0%slope at 30 ft max.O.C.with internal water storage; Material in all other cases,6"perforated PVC or HDPE laid at 0.5%slope min.at 30 ft max.O.C. Applicability Required Required I Required I Required I Required Required Drainage Filler Fabric Material6 Non-woven,polypropylene geotextile with flow rate greater than 125 gpm/sf(ASTM D4491) and Apparent Opening Size US#70 sieve(ASTM D4751) Applicability As Required N/A N/A N/A As Required I As Required Impermeable 12-24 inch of clay soil(min.50%passing#200 sieve and max.permeability 1 x 10-5 Liner Material cm/sec) or 40 mil HDPE geomembrane Slope 15%max. Maintenance Width 12 ft.min. Access' Material Able to withstand loading from maintenance equipment and vehicles Footnotes: 'Required for all Design Variants 'Design Variant F-6: • Stone:No.89,no recycled material,non-limestone material mineral aggregate • Perlite:Agricultural grade,free of toxic materials(0-30%passing No.18 Sieve,0-10%passing No.30 Sieve)1 cy13 cy of stone • Dolomite:CaMg(CO3)2(calcium magnesium carbonate)Agricultural grade,free of toxic materials(100%passing No.8 Sieve,0% passing No.16 Sieve)10 Ibs/cy perlite • Gypsum:CaSO4.2H2O(hydrated calcium sulfate).Non-calcined,agricultural grade,free of toxic materials(100%passing No.8 Sieve, 0%passing No.16 Sieve)1.5 Ib/cy perlite 'Enhanced Filter Media shall be used within watersheds requiring enhanced phosphorus removal.Refer to Chapter 4 for impaired watershed information. °Topsoil shall conform to NYSDOT Standard Specification 713-01 for Roadside Mix or Specialty Planting Mix. 5For Designs F-4 and F-5,the organic component shall not consist of compost. 'Or acceptable alternatives,such as a 3 inch minimum layer of pea gravel Chapter 6:Standard Stormwater Management Practices 6 61 EXHIBIT G t � I i r d�'''T •i � - t shutterstock.com•2515962531 FRI i `a. Late T lez lie- JO ►-�► j "'-L�AL-A. O.Z Lauren McMahon Project Engineer LANGAN Direct: 914.323.7422 2 � � ��` t' �± = : `i c r� D ECEFyF-C� AUG 2 9 2025 MOSS & KALISH , PLLC VILLAGE OF RYA BROOK COUNSELLORS AT LAW BUILDING DEPARTMENT 122 EAST 42ND STREET MARK L.KALISH NEW Y O R K, NY 1 0 1 6 8-0 0 9 8 NASM OFFICE DAVID B.GELFARB' ___ 500 OLD Comm SUITE 206 OAROEN crtY,NY 11530 JAMESSCHWARTZMAN TELEPHONE: (212) 867-4488 TELECOPIER: (212) 983-5276 writer's e-mail: 'oleo ADUMM IN NEW JERSEY E-MAIL: L A W Y E R S @ M O S S K A L I S H.C O M gelfarb@mosskalish.com August 25, 2025 Honorable Chairman Robert Goodman and Members of the Village Planning Board Village of Rye Brook 938 King Street Rye Brook,New York 10573 Re: Kingfield Lot Owners Association,Inc. Application for Site Plan Amendment Rose Lane, Rye Brook,NY 10573 Parcel ID No. 129.25-1-1 Dear Honorable Chairman Goodman and Members of the Planning Board: We are the attorneys for the Kingfield Lot Owners Association, Inc. (the "Association"). I write in further support of the Association's application to amend the PUD site plan approved by the Board of Trustees on February 23, 2016, as amended on January 10, 2017 pursuant to resolution of the Board of Trustees, as further amended October 30, 2017 pursuant to resolution of the Board of Trustees (the "2017 Resolution"), and as further amended on February 13, 2018 pursuant to resolution of the Board of Trustees (following a Report and Recommendation by this Board dated February 8, 2018)(the "2018 Resolution"). By way of review,the Association requests that the Village authorize a"swap"or"trade" of 4,835 square feet of (unused) impervious surface coverage from the common area of the Kingfield residential development("Kingfield"or the"Development")to the homeowners for use in connection with their patios,decks,walkways or other impervious surface.As the materials that we have previously submitted address, there are 35 homes that have expanded patios for a total expanded impervious surface of 3,613.47 square feet. Thus, if the Planning Board (the `Board") approves this application, there will still be 1,221.53 square feet of impervious surface available for the 75 homeowners who have not expanded their patios. The Association has carefully considered the comments, suggestions and concerns that members of the Board have offered during our initial presentation at the May 8, 2025 Board meeting and at the public hearing that was held at the June 12, 2025 and July 10, 2025 Board Honorable Chairman Robert Goodman August 25, 2025 Page 2 meetings. The Association appreciates the time and consideration that Board members and Village staff have given to this application to date. The Association will establish a process to evaluate applications for the expansion of patios through the use of both impervious and,as we will address further below,permeable materials. At this time, the Association anticipates that its Board of Directors (the "Kingfield Board") will evaluate applications with guidance, to the extent necessary, from Management, counsel and the Association's engineers, Langan Engineering. Absolutely no expansion will be permitted without review by and approval by the Kingfield Board. The Kingfield Board is cognizant that, and will continue to explain to homeowners, that homeowners seeking to expand their patios (or to "legalize" an expansion that has already occurred) will have to resolve any outstanding violations, pay application fees to the Village, submit building plan, obtain building permits, etc. The Association will also establish a process for keeping track of the square footage of additional impervious surface that is allowed. At this point, we plan to have the Kingfield Board oversee it. Management and Langan Engineering will be engaged in this process on an as-needed basis. The Association will provide an annual written update to the Village on the amount of impervious space that has been added, and how much remains from the 4,835 square feet. The Association understands the significance, particularly with respect to stormwater management,of not going beyond the impervious surface limitation that has been established. The Association intends to keep careful records of applications and authorizations in order to ensure that it stays within the limits approved by the Board. Standards to be Applied in Reviewing_Applications The Association intends to establish a system for reviewing applications to enlarge patios that is fair and equitable. The Kingfield Board intends to apply certain standards in reviewing and granting applications for patio expansion. The Association expects that these standards will apply in the case of enlargements with impervious and pervious materials. These standards shall include a possible cap on the additional square footage to be allowed for a given patio and the impact on the community, including aesthetics.The Kingfield Board will consider compatibility, contextual relationship, proportion, rhythm, scale, colors and materials. Priority will be given to increases that relate favorably to the Development's planning, landscaping,topography and existing character. The Association further intends to require that the workmanship be equal to or exceed the quality of the existing patio.Another consideration to be considered is the impact on the privacy and normal use of neighboring properties. Materials to be Used for Expansion and Enlargement of Patios Honorable Chairman Robert Goodman August 25, 2025 Page 3 If,as and when Kingfield reaches the 4,835 square foot limit,the Kingfield Board will consider several options in addressing future requests for expansion of patios. These options can be broken down into two broad categories,namely the use of(i) pervious materials or(ii) impervious materials. 1. Permeable Materials One option is to require homeowners to use materials that do not add to the impervious surface,namely permeable pavers. Permeable pavers actively direct water back into the soil. Section 5.3.9 of the New York State Stormwater Management Design Manual(the "Design Manual"), entitled Porous Pavement(RR-9),provides in part as follows: Porous pavement is a broadly defined group of pervious surfaces that can be applied as an alternative to typical impervious surfaces for road, driveway, sidewalk, or plaza applications. These systems are designed to convey rainfall through the surface into an underlying reservoir that provides structural support, filters pollutants, temporarily stores runoff, and promotes infiltration. Porous pavements are designed to reduce the effective impervious area on a site; thereby reducing design volumes and peak discharge rates. These systems must be designed to support applicable loading, and carefully constructed and maintained to ensure long-term function. A copy of Section 5.3.9 is annexed hereto as Exhibit`B." The Association believes that a patio comprised (or in the case of enlargements, partially comprised)of permeable pavers can be just as aesthetically pleasing and functional as a"traditional paver"made of a concrete and sand mixture. A copy of pages from a brochure issued by Unilock, a leading supplier of permeable pavers,is annexed hereto as Exhibit"A."More information about permeable pavers is available at Permeable Pavers for Driveways,Patios,and Walkways I Unilock. While a detailed discussion of engineering matters is beyond the scope of this submission,the Association recognizes that the Stormwater Manual has certain requirements with respect to permeable pavers. We note that a geotechnical (e.g. percolation) test may be required and that a "key consideration",as is set forth on page 5-78 is that the"minimum infiltration rate of underlying soil is 0.50 inch/hr").The Association believes that permeable pavers are a very feasible alternative to traditional non-permeable pavers and will work with the Village Engineer to ensure compliance with stormwater runoff requirements. The Association strongly believes that the use of permeable pavers is consistent with satisfying,to the extent reasonably feasible,the Board's concerns about fairness. Put simply,if no additional impervious square footage is being added,then there is less concern about any limitation on adding additional impervious surface. While we recognize that no process for allocating a limited amount of impervious square footage can meet everyone's standard of fairness,the use of permeable pavers ameliorates a great deal of the concern. Honorable Chairman Robert Goodman August 25, 2025 Page 4 There will no longer be a concern that only certain people will be able to expand their patios, or that those who acted first will have an unfair advantage over their neighbors. Instead, by using permeable pavers, any homeowner, including homeowners who move into Kingfield years in the future, can apply to expand their patio and will not be confronted by a limitation on impervious surface that they had nothing to do with. Put simply,if no additional impervious square footage is being added, then there is less concern about any limitation on adding additional impervious surface. II. Impervious Materials A. Tree Plantings A potential option for homeowners who seek to expand their patios, but who want to use impervious materials, would be tree plantings. The idea would be that even if impervious pavers were used, the Stormwater Manual allows for tree plantings to be installed as a runoff reduction technique. Specifically, section 5.3.3 of the Stormwater Manual, entitled "Tree Planting/Tree Pit/Tree Trench (RR-3)"provides as follows: Tree plantings are existing or newly planted trees in a natural setting that can be applied as runoff reduction technique. A copy of section 5.3.3 of the Stormwater Manual is annexed hereto as Exhibit"C." Section 5.3.3.3.2 provides, in part, for a credit for impervious surface reduction where a tree has been planted, as follows: Area Reduction (Tree Planting) • Credit for impervious area reduction shall be the following: o Mature tree canopy less than 16 ft diameter: half the area of the tree canopy. o Mature tree canopy greater than or equal to 16 ft diameter: 100 SF per tree. In general, new trees would need to be planted no further than ten(10') feet from the edge of patio.Each patio would need to be evaluated on a case by case basis to determine how many trees are required to be installed,the tree species to be allowed, etc. We note that trees should not be planted over or in close proximity to existing utilities. It would be important to markout utilities before work commenced. In the event that a homeowner who seeks to increase the size of their patio determines to use tree plantings as a runoff reduction technique, the homeowner will be required to satisfy both the Kingfield Board and the Village that there should not be any increase in impervious surface attributable to the enlarged patio. Honorable Chairman Robert Goodman August 25, 2025 Page 5 B. Pea Gravel Diaphragm In the event a homeowner wanted to utilize impervious materials, and there was little or none of the 1,221 square feet available, another option would be a"Pea Gravel diaphragm." We understand that a pea gravel diaphragm is a small gravel filled trench that acts as an inlet structure by redistributing concentrated flow to sheet flow. It is a pretreatment device that filters and settles sediment particles. They are commonly used in conjunction with other stormwater treatment practices.Langan Engineering would have to study this option further,but a preliminary estimate is that a 1 foot wide by 1.5 feet deep trench should be adequate to capture the anticipated runoff from the additional impervious area represented by a single patio expansion. Annexed hereto as Exhibit "D" is Figure 6.20 (at page 6-55) from the Stormwater Manual, depicting a pea gravel diaphragm. Annexed hereto as Exhibit "E" is Figure 6.11 from the Stormwater Manual, which depicts an infiltration trench (of which a pea gravel diaphragm is an integral component). Annexed hereto as Exhibit"E" is Table 6.14 from the Stormwater Manual, which sets forth certain design specifications applicable to pea gravel diaphragms.Lastly,annexed hereto as Exhibit"F"are photographs depicting pea gravel diaphragms. C. Modification of Stormwater Management Facilities A final option that the Association may consider, if there is little or no additional impervious surface remaining from the "swap," is to apply for a modification of the existing stormwater management facilities. Such an application would seek to expand the coverage of the stormwater management facilities. To date, no study of the feasibility, scope or cost of such modification has been undertaken. At present, the Kingfield Board believes that in the event little or no impervious surface remains to be allocated to homeowners who want to expand their patios, it would be significantly more cost-effective to use the other options outlined above,namely pervious pavers,tree plantings and pea gravel diaphragms. Nonetheless, the Kingfield Board intends to at least consider this option with Langan Engineering. There is Siianificant Uncertainty Concerning Any Future Strong Demand to Enlarge Patios As noted above, the Association is very conscious of the Board's concerns about the fairness of any plans for allowing increased impervious coverage. To date, 35 homes have expanded their patios,which leaves 75 homes that have not undertaken such activity. However,the Association believes that many homes are unlikely to apply for expansion, or if they do, the enlargement would be very small. Indeed, of the 35 homes that have expanded their patios, 8 have added less than 32 square feet of additional impervious surface. Honorable Chairman Robert Goodman August 25, 2025 Page 6 A review of drawings CS-100, CS-101 and CS-102, prepared by Langan Engineering and submitted to the Board as part of the Association's application, as well as a "walk-through" of Kingfield, indicates that it would be impractical for many of the remaining houses to enlarge their patios. Many homes simply have little remaining space to expand their patios. For others, the layout and topography of the homes and their plots is not conducive to expansion. For example,of the 11 houses on the west side of Rose Lane,only one [8 Rose Lane],has enlarged its patio(by 27 square feet). On the east side of Rose Lane, only one [3 Rose Lane],has enlarged its patio (by 14 square feet). The houses on the west side of Rose Lane back up to a fence. Their patios are"back to back" with the patios of the houses on the east side of Jasmine Lane. None of the 14 homes on the east side of Jasmine Lane have enlarged their patios. Given the proximity of the rear sides of these houses to each other, there will likely be concern about noise impacting neighbors if patios were enlarged. There are also stormwater management facilities between the homes, which is not conducive to enlargement. Similarly, the houses on the west side of Jasmine Lane are surrounded by a large fence. The fence is very close to some of these houses, making it unfeasible to expand the patios. It appears that it is more feasible for homes whose patios face away from other homes, i.e. are on the periphery of Kingfield,such as on the east side of Lavender Lane,the south side of Primrose Lane, or on Honeysuckle Lane,to have expanded patios. Many such homes have already expanded their patios. We recognize that there has been concern expressed about sheds,because they can add impervious surface and do not require a building permit. The Association has no intent of allowing sheds.None have ever been requested. Thank you for your continued consideration of this matter. We look forward to further discussing this application with the Planning Board at its September 11, 2025 meeting. Respectfully submitted, David B. Gelfarb cc: Robert Zitt,Esq. EXHIBIT A 5.3.9 Porous Pavement (RR-9) Porous pavement is a broadly defined group of pervious surfaces that can be applied as an alternative to typical impervious surfaces for road, driveway, sidewalk, or plaza applications. These systems are designed to convey rainfall through the surface into an underlying reservoir that provides structural support, filters pollutants, temporarily stores runoff, and promotes infiltration. Porous pavements are designed to reduce the effective impervious area on a site; thereby reducing design volumes and peak discharge rates. These systems must be designed to support applicable loading, and carefully constructed and maintained to ensure long-term function. 3" MIN TOP COURSE POROUS ASPHALT PAVEMENT 3" MIN BINDER COURSE POROUS ASPHALT PAVEMENT 1' MIN NO. 2 STONE CHOKER COURSE (WASHED, NO FINES) 12" MIN NO. 4A STONE RESERVOIR (WASHED, NO FINES) DRAINAGE FILTER FABRIC 24' MIN SEPARATION TO SEASONAL HIGH WATER TABLE/BEDROCK ROAD,DRIVE,AND PARKING LOT WITHOUT UNDERDRAIN SECTION VIEW 3" MIN TOP COURSE POROUS ASPHALT PAVEMENT 1" MIN NO. 2 STONE CHOKER COURSE ((WASHED, NO FINES) 8" MIN NO. 4A STONE RESERVOIR `—————_ (WASHED, NO FINES) DRAINAGE FILTER FABRIC 24' MIN SEPARATION TO SEASONAL HIGH WATER TABLE/BEDROCK SZ PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY WITHOUT UNDERDRAIN SECTION VIEW 6' PVC PERFORATED OBSERVATION WELL MATH LOCKABLE CAP SOLID FRAME AND COVER SET 6 PVC PERFORATED OBSERVATION WELL IN CONCRETE COLLAR WITH LOCKABLE CAP II SOLID FRAME AND COVER SET IN CONCRETE COLLAR PER 0 DESIGN 0 SECTION I I PER 0 10" MIN NO. 57 STONE 00 DESIGN DRAINAGE LAYER ( - 00 _ SECTION (WASHED, ( 00 NO FINES) ———— WOv MAX- PONOING DEPTH - FOOT PLATE 24" MIN 24" MIN SEPARATION TO 6" MIN SOLID SEPARATION TO SEASONAL HIGH HEADER PIPE SEASONAL HIGH WATER TABLE/BEDROCK 6" PERFORATED WATER TABLE/BEDROCK UNDERDRAIN SET _ 30' O.C. MAX SZ OBSERVATION WELL WITH UNDERDRAIN OBSERVATION WELL WITHOUT UNDERDRAIN SECTION VIEW SECTION VIEW Figure 5.46 Porous Asphalt Pavement(RR-9) Chapter 5: Runoff Reduction Techniques 5-71 JOINT SPACING AND FILLER PER MANUFACTURER RECOMMENDATIONS POROUS PAVERS PAVER RESTRAINT PER MANUFACTURER RECOMMENDATIONS 2" BEDDING COURSE PER MANUFACTURER RECOMMENDATIONS I" MIN NO. 2 STONE _ CHOKER COURSE (WASHED, NO FINES) 8" MIN NO. 4A STONE RESERVOIR (WASHED, NO FINES) DRAINAGE FILTER FABRIC ——————————— 24" MIN SEPARATION TO SEASONAL HIGH WATER TABLE/BEDROCK POROUS PAVER WITHOUT UNDERDRAIN SECTION VIEW 4" MIN. POROUS CONCRETE CONCRETE THICKNESS AND - REINFORCEMENT DESIGNED PER TRAFFIC LOADING -� 1" MIN NO. 2 STONE CHOKER COURSE (WASHED, NO FINES) LEVEL 1 8- MIN NO. 4A STONE RESERVOIR ' (WASHED, NO FINES) I FVFI 9 12" MIN NO. 4A STONE RESERVOIR ' (WASHED, NO FINES) I DRAINAGE FILTER FABRIC ——————————— 24" MIN SEPARATION TO SEASONAL HIGH WATER TABLE/BEDROCK —17 POROUS CONCRETE WITHOUT UNDERDRAIN SECTION Vi-€W_ ---- Figure 5.47 Porous Pavers &Concrete (RR-9) Chapter 5:Runoff Reduction Techniques 5-72 Design Variants Porous pavement systems can be broken into two general design variants: 1. Porous Pavement Systems - Level 1 (Non-Vehicle Traffic): Designed to support light-duty, non-vehicle traffic only. Filter layer is typically sized to accommodate only rainfall that falls directly on the surface of the system. Generally, consist of porous pavers and flexible porous pavement. 2. Porous Pavement Systems -Level 2 (Vehicle Traffic): Designed to support heavy-duty structural load and/or accommodate storage of larger storm events. Filter layer must be sized to store the entire WQv for the tributary area and can be sized to accept runoff from adjacent impervious areas. Generally, consist of porous asphalt pavement, porous concrete, traffic-rated porous pavers, porous gravel with stabilization grid/cell, stabilized grass grid/cell and grass block pavers. 5.3.9.1 Feasibility • Porous pavements shall be used in low dust areas and areas with low vehicle traffic volume. The systems shall be designed with the capability of bearing the anticipated vehicle and traffic loads. • Porous pavements may be applied as practices for urban stormwater management(see Chapter 8). • Sand and other winter traction materials shall not be used on porous pavement systems. • Porous pavement systems shall not be used to treat stormwater hotspots. • In areas of known contamination, or if contamination is discovered during excavation, contaminant levels must be evaluated by a qualified professional and state remediation program to determine if infiltration is permitted. • Slope across the finished surface shall not exceed 10%. • Slope across the bottom of the stone reservoir shall not exceed 5%. Where surface slope exceeds 5%, the stone reservoir shall be stepped to meet this criteria and underdrains shall be used to distribute runoff through the reservoir evenly. • The contributing area to porous pavements shall not exceed 3 times the surface area of the porous system. • Porous pavements shall meet the separation requirements as listed in Table 5.17.Vertical separation shall be taken from the bottom of the stone drainage layer. Horizontal separation shall be taken from the closest side of the filter media. Table 5.17 Porous Pavement Minimum Separation Requirements Vertical Separation Horizontal Separation Structures Seasonal Structures With Design �,2 Without Water Supply Septic Variant High Water Bedrock Foundation Foundation Well/Reservoir System3.4 Table Waterproofing Waterproofing Level 1 loft Oft 2ft 2ft 100ft 50ft Level 2 25 ft loft 'Sound bedrock,fractured bedrock or karst geology as documented by on-site soil testing. 24 ft in sole source aquifers. 'Septic systems are inclusive of septic tanks,distribution boxes,and absorption fields. `If underdrains are proposed,minimum setback shall be 100 ft. • Porous pavement systems shall not be used unless the underlying soils have an infiltration rate greater than or equal to 0,50 inch/hr, as confirmed by required geotechnical testing (see Appendix D). Chapter 5: Runoff Reduction Techniques 5-73 e Where underlying soils have an infiltration rate less than 2 inch/hr, underdrains shall be provided. If underlying soils have an infiltration rate greater than or equal to 2 inch/hr, underdrains are not required. • If porous pavement systems are constructed in engineered fill soils, then the following criteria shall be met: In-situ/natural soil layer below the porous pavement system shall have an infiltration rate greater or equal to the engineered fill soils, as determined by geotechnical testing (Appendix D); Soils proposed for engineered fill shall be classified as suitable using Table 5.18 and Figure 5.48; Soils proposed for engineered fill shall have a minimum infiltration rate of 0.50 inch/hr and a material gradation similar to the in-situ/natural soils, as determined by geotechnical testing; After placement of engineered fill, permeability testing (Appendix D) shall be performed to confirm the actual in place infiltration rate. If engineered fill material requirements are not met, the material shall be removed; and The required vertical separation shall be measured from the existing grade of in-situ/natural soil. Engineered fill soils shall not be used to meet separation requirements. HydrologicTable 5.18 . Properties Soil Texture Class Hydrologic Soil Minimum Infiltration Rate Suitability Group (Inch/hr) Sand A 8.27 Loamy sand A 2.41 Suitable for engineered fill for infiltration practice Sandy loam B 1.02 design Loam B 0.52 Silt loam C 0.27 Sandy clay loam C 0.17 Clay loam D 0.09 Not suitable for Silt clay loam D 0.06 engineered fill for Sandy clay D 0.05 infiltration practice design Silty clay D 0.04 Clay D 0.02 Chapter 5:Runoff Reduction Techniques 5-74 !! I00 90 70 so ';� 'Cluy 4nG0 Jq 50 ailty� pil L� �wndy clay au cloy \ / o )0 .and cloy lam clay Imm ^ Y clav loam \ /VVI/\,) 4C 20 OUT slll randy loam 10 Inam loamy sit �a send sand �_ • Sand Separate.% Figure 6.48 USDA Soil Textural Classification • The following requirements shall be in place, during construction: At the time of installation, extremely high or low temperatures shall be avoided. System areas shall be clearly marked before any site work begins to avoid soil disturbance and compaction. Heavy equipment traffic shall be restricted from areas of existing or proposed porous pavements. Construction of upstream areas shall be completed, and adequate vegetative cover shall be established over the entire tributary pervious area, before draining to the porous pavement system. Subsurface area shall be excavated to the proposed depth of the porous pavement section. Existing subgrade shall not be compacted or subject to excessive construction equipment prior to placement of drainage filter fabric and stone reservoir. Where erosion of subgrade has caused accumulation of fine materials and/or surface ponding, this material shall be removed, and the underlying soils scarified to a minimum depth of 6 inches. Place drainage filter fabric, or acceptable alternative, and stone drainage layer, immediately after approval of subgrade preparation to prevent accumulation of debris or sediment. • To ensure proper management post-construction, the following activities shall be avoided: Application of sand during winter months. Only use plow or snow removal equipment that is suitable for the specific type of porous pavement. Do not place dumpsters on or immediately upgradient of the pavement surface. Do not store or place dirt, grit, mulch, sand, or other similar materials on or near the pavement surface. 5.3.9.2 Conveyance • Runoff shall be conveyed to the practice via sheet flow. • When designing porous pavement systems for treatment of adjacent areas, the stone reservoir shall be designed with additional capacity. Chapter 5:Runoff Reduction Techniques 5-75 5.3.9.3 Pretreatment • If pervious adjacent areas discharge to the porous pavement system, then pretreatment shall be provided by grass filter strip and minimum 24 inch wide by 12 inch deep pea gravel diaphragm for that area. Refer to Table 6.2 for pretreatment sizing criteria. 5.3.9.4 Treatment 5.3.9.4.1 Design Criteria Depth of stone reservoir shall be designed to account for the total contributing area,traffic load, in-situ soil characteristics, as well as water quality volume and quantity control requirements. Table 5.19 Porous Pavement Design Specifications Porous Asphalt Porous Concrete Porous Paver' Depth 3 inch min. 4 inch min. Per manufacturer specifications Portland Cement Type I or II Surface (ASTM C 150), No. 8(ASTM 33), Layer' NYSDOT Approved Top A Cement Ratio 4:1 to 4.5:1 Per manufacturer Material Course Porous Asphalt Pavement Specification Water/Cement er/Cement Ratio 0.28-0.35 specifications Reinforcement designed per traffic loading Applicability Level 1: N/A N/A N/A Binder Level 2: Required Course Depth 3 inch min. Material NYSDOT Approved Binder Course Porous Asphalt Pavement Specification Applicability N/A N/A Required Bedding Depth 2 inch min.or per manufacturer specifications Course Material Per manufacturer specifications Choker Depth 1 inch min. Course' Material NYSDOT No.2 stone, washed, no fines Level 1: 8 inch min. 8 inch min. Stone Depth Level 2 12 inch min. See Section 5.3.9.4.2 Reservoir' See Section 5.3.9.4.2 Material NYSDOT No.4A stone,washed, no fines Applicability Required when underdrain is provided Drainage Depth 10 inch min. Layer Material AASHTO No. 57 stone,washed, no fines Filter Fabric' and Apparent Opening Drainage Material2 Non-woven, polypropylene with Size US#70 greater ve(ASTM D4751)f(ASTM D4491) Applicability Underlying infiltration rates greater than or equal to 0.50 inch/hr and less than 2.0 inch/hr Underdrain Material 6"perforated PVC or HDPE laid at 0.50%min. 30 ft max. O.C. Underdrain invert shall be set at or above the WOv peak water surface elevation. Observation Material 6 inch min.perforated vertical PVC or HDPE pipe,with lockable cap installed flush with the Well' I I surface. Footnotes: 'Required for all Design Variants 2Or acceptable alternatives,such as a 3 inch minimum layer of pea gravel 'Porous Paver specifications include proprietary grid and geocell structures filled with permeable material specified by the product manufacturer. Chapter 5: Runoff Reduction Techniques 5-76 5.3.9.4.2 Sizing Criteria First, calculate the minimum depth of the stone reservoir needed to store the WQ,,storm event. The calculated minimum depth shall be compared to the minimum reservoir depth in Table 5.19 and the higher value shall be used. Where underdrains are proposed,the invert of the underdrain shall be set at an elevation above the WQ, WQv dP AP. Where: Dp= Calculated minimum depth of stone reservoir(ft) WQv=Water Quality Volume(cf) Ap= Surface area of porous pavement(sf) 0 = Porosity (assume 0.40) Next calculate the required total length of underdrain piping (LT), then calculate the required number of underdrains(N), rounding up to the nearest whole number: AP LT = S P N L — Lr u Where: Sp=spacing between underdrain pipes (ft on-center) (max. 30 ft) Lu=design length of underdrain pipe(ft) Chapter 5: Runoff Reduction Techniques 5-77 Fact Sheet: Porous Pavement (RR-9) Description:A broadly defined group of pervious surfaces that can be applied as an alternative to typical impervious surfaces for road, driveway, sidewalk, or plaza applications. Designed to convey rainfall through the # $ k surface into an underlying reservoir that provides structural support, filters pollutants, temporarily stores runoff, and promotes infiltration. FEASIBILITY STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SUITABILITY • Use in low dust areas and area with low traffic volume • Water Quality • Shall be designed with the capability of bearing the anticipated vehicle . Channel Protection and traffic loads • Sand and winter traction materials shall not be used • Overbank Flood Protection • Maximum slope across the finished surface is 10% • Extreme Flood Protection • Maximum slope across the bottom of the stone reservoir is 5% O Runoff Reduction • Where surface slope exceeds 5%,the stone reservoir shall be stepped with underdrains • Treatment of Hotspots • Minimum separation to bedrock/high water table is 2 ft a Linear Applications • Minimum infiltration rate of underlying soil is 0.50 inch/hr • Where underlying soils have an infiltration rate less than 2 inch/hr suitable for this practice underdrains shall be provided IMPLEMENTATION CONSIDERATIONS • Heavy equipment shall be restricted from area before,during and after Capital Cost construction • Contributing area to porous pavements shall not exceed 3 times the © Maintenance Burden surface area of the porous system O Safety CONVEYANCE Landscaping • Runoff shall enter practice through sheet flow • When designing systems for treatment of adjacent areas,the stone L=Low M=Moderate H=High NA—Not Applicable reservoir shall be designed with additional capacity PRETREATMENT POLLUTANT REMOVAL(See Table 10.4) • If pervious adjacent areas discharge to the system,a grass filter strip and O Phosphorus minimum 24 inch wide by 12 inch deep pea gravel diaphragm shall be provided Nitrogen TREATMENT iO Metals • Depth of stone reservoir shall be designed to account for the total 10 Pathogens contributing area,traffic load, in-situ soil characteristics and WQv and quantity control requirements O Total Suspended Solids • System shall be designed to ensure the peak water surface elevation for G=Good F=Fair P=Poor the 10-year, 24-hr design storm does not rise above the stone reservoir RUNOFF REDUCTION CREDIT • Where underdrains are provided,the invert of the underdrain shall be set at an elevation above the required WQv storage • 100%(40%)of the runoff reduction volume provided by this practice without underdrains (with underdrains) Chapter 5:Runoff Reduction Techniques 5-78 EXHIBIT B f�. t 4 Aw r 1 VI 'l4 Town Hail Permeable TV Unilock introduced the first permeable paver to North America in 1991.Long used to manage water in commercial projects,in recent years,increased storm events and residential flooding have motivated more and more homeowners to install permeable pavers in their own projects. At first glance,permeable pavers look similar to traditional pavers.The difference lies in the width of the joint between units,the material used to fill the joints,and the base upon which the pavers are installed.Wider joints, permeable joint material and an open graded base design all work together to direct water through the surface and into the subsoil below,instead of flowing off the surface and into overburdened storm sewer systems. Special materials are used in thejoints and in the permeable base below,to encourage water to flow through. Some homeowners install rainwater collection systems underneath their paver projects to supply water to in-ground sprinkler systems. =o 0 o: _ a U O J ' 4,w Permeable Paver Benefits Keep an eye out for our permeable icon I.01 Reduced Flooding throughout our product pages. Storm sewers are less likely to overflow when more rainwater flows through the pavement surface. While all segmental paving can be `-cam Improved Filtration permeable to some degree,these products 0 Road salts,pesticides,oil and other harmful feature special spacer bars that promote pollutants are naturally filtered through a permeable exceptional flow-through. system before they reach rivers and lakes. ECO-HEX" Increased Square Footage Vo Installing a permeable driveway can enable ECO-PROMENADE'" homeowners who live in regions where the ratio of impervious lot coverage is restricted,to install new ECO-PRIORA'"PREMIER landscape features such as a pool. NORDIC COBBLE- Safety Decreased puddling on the surface of permeable THORNBURY SMOOTH pavement will reduce ice build-up in winter. TRIBECA COBBLE'" Long-term Savings Rainwater collection systems beneath pavers can TREO SMOOTH' reduce the expense of water used for irrigation and may be eligible for tax credits and subsidies. TOWN HALL 60 ENDURAC LOR O EasyCleain %Ei, 00 Factory sealed for integral stain resistance Z Q m F Umbriano° 80mm Exclusive to JNILOCK SUMMER WHEAT WINTER MARVEL 3 UNIT RANDOM BUNDLE' DRIVE FRIENDLY Large Rectangle 14x21x3'/s" 360 x 540 x 80mm Small Rectangle Square 7x14x3%" 14x14x3'/e" 180 x 360 x 80mm 360 x 360 x 80mm 4 x 12' PERMEABLE DRIVE FRIENDLY ------ ---- -- 37/a x 117/a x 3'/a" Available in French Grey,Winter Marvel and Midnight Sky only. 100 x 300 x 80mm See previous page for swatches. See page 119 for additional finishes. 146 Lead time required. e ENDURACCLOR 0 0 F 0 w M TreoT Smooth I � ALMOND GROVE SLATE GRANITE FUSION(STEEL MOUNTAIN) t_� h t j FOSSIL WALNUT 3 UNIT RANDOM BUNDLE PERMEABLE DRIVE FRIENDLY ][ Large Rectangle Square Small Rectangle 9'14 x 131/4 x 23A 9�14 x 9�I4 x 23/8 45/a x 91/4 x 23/8 233 x 349.5 x 60mm 233 x 233 x 60mm 116.5 x 233 x 60mm SMALL RECTANGLE SOLD SEPARATELY - — - — — -- ` 45/a x 9�14 x 23/e" 116.5x233x60mm Almond Grove Granite Fusion Fossil Dark Charcoal 142 (Steel Mountain) EXHIBIT C 5.3.3 Tree Planting/Tree Pit/Tree Trench (RR-3) Tree plantings are existing or newly planted trees in a natural setting that can be applied as a runoff reduction technique for Area Reduction. REFER TO APPENDIX H FOR TREE SPECIES. 2—INCH MIN CALIPER OR 6—FOOT MIN HEIGHT FOR NEW TREE PLANTINGS 4—INCH MIN CALIPER OR 6—FOOT MIN HEIGHT FOR EXISTING TREES 3' MIN SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH CONTRIBUTING IMPERVIOUS rFINISHED AREA GRADE LAWN FILTER MEDIA 3' f MIN DEPTH OR ROOT BALL DEPTH, WHICHEVER IS GREATER ' AIIN 10' MAX FOR NEW TREE PLANTINGS 20' MAX TO CANOPY FOR EXISTING TREES SHEET FLOW FROM ASPHALT PAVEMENT OR THROUGH CURB DROP PROFILE VIEW Figure 5.35 Tree Planting (RR-3) Chapter 5:Runoff Reduction Techniques 5-37 Tree pits refer to individually planted trees in contained areas, such as street trees within sidewalks or curbed islands, that can be applied as a runoff reduction technique for Volume Reduction. 5' MIN CURB OR ANCHORED FRAME AT PERIMETER OF TREE PIT TO SUPPORT TREE GRATE 5' MIN Teo A A PLAN VIEW 3 CURB OR ANCHORED " MIN SHREDDED FRAME AT PERIMETER OF HARDWOOD MULCH TREE PIT TO SUPPORT TREE GRATE 3` _—_ 6" MIN PERFORATED UNDERDRAIN (IF REQUIRED) FILTER MEDIA 36" MIN DEPTH 6' MIN NO. 57 STONE DRAINAGE LAYER I I (WASHED, NO FINES) 2' MIN pEPTH -�-- WHERE UNDERDRAIN IS REQUIRED, PROVIDE ROOT BARRIER I ----------- 10" MIN NO. 57 STONE DRAINAGE LAYER DRAINAGE (WASHED, NO FINES) FILTER FABRIC PROFILE VIEW Y� 24" MIN SEPARATION TO SEASONAL HIGH WATER TABLE/BEDROCK REFER TO APPENDIX H SUGGESTED PLANT LIST CURB OR ANCHORED FRAME AT PERIMETER 3" MIN SHREDDED OF TREE PIT TO SUPPORT TREE GRATE HARDWOOD MULCH TREE GRATE FILTER MEDIA 36" MIN DEPTH I � ' ------I rL_ DRAINAGE FILTER FABRIC SECTION A-A VIEW 6" MIN PERFORATED UNDERDRAIN (IF REQUIRED) TRANSITION TO SOLID PIPE BEYOND LIMITS OF TREE PIT (TYP) Figure 5.36 Tree Pit (RR-3) Chapter 5:Runoff Reduction Techniques 5-38 Tree trenches are linearly planted trees along an impervious surface, such as roads or sidewalks, that capture surface flow and are connected by an underground stone reservoir with perforated pipe to maximize infiltration for credit as a runoff reduction technique for Volume Reduction. Tree trenches can support surface or subsurface flow. 12" MIN PERFORATED INFILTRATION PIPE umiT OF SUBSURFACE r CLEAN DOT A STORAGE MEDIA F!, 1 1 1 7 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 CATCH BASIN INLET PLAN VIEW r— — 10' O.C. MIN. REFER TO APPENDIX H SUGGESTED PLANT UST CATCH BASIN INLET 3" MIN SHREDDED CLEAN OUT HARDWOOD MULCH FILTER MEDIA l 36" MIN DEPTH ---- --- ------ -------------- 2' MIN NO. 2 Q1111,fil 1 11 STONE DRAINAGE ------------ ----------- LAYER (WASHED, ROOT BARRIER NO FINES) DRAINAGE FILTER FABRIC 2' DEPTH - 12" MIN PERFORATED 24" MIN INFILTRATION PIPE SEPARATION TO STRUCTURAL SOIL OR PROPRIETARY SEASONAL HIGH SOIL CELL PRODUCT CAPABLE OF PROFILE VIEW WATER TABLE/BEDROCK SUPPORTING WALKING SURFACE ABOVE AND TREE ROOT GROWTH (TYP) 3" MIN SHREDDED HARDWOOD CLEAN OUT 1 FILTER MEDIA I i 36" MIN DEPTH I —� 24" MIN NO. 2 STONE DRAINAGE LAYER DRAINAGE FILTER FABRIC I i (WASHED, NO FINES) 12" MIN INFILTRATION PIPE `------------ 24" MIN Q SEPARATION TO = SEASONAL HIGH SECTION A-A VIEW WATER TABLE/BEDROCK Figure 5.37 Tree Trench Subsurface Flow(RR-3) Chapter 5:Runoff Reduction Techniques 5-39 12" MIN INFILTRATION PIPE DOME OR INLET CURB SIDEWALK INLET CURBED OVERFLOW GRATE MIN WIDTH) TRENCH ENTREE CLOSURE I L STABILIZED INLET TRENCH DRAIN STABILIZED A PRETREATMENT PLAN VIEW ( ) OPTION 1: 10' O.C. MIN. -DROP CURB LION BASKET INLET DOME OR INLET -� OVERFLOW GRATE '�.`` 3' MIN HARDWOOD MULCH D T--1 Li . - - -1 . - __ - - / - il FILTER MEDIA 36" MIN DEPTH _ uull.iu 24' MIN NO. 2 STONE �... ..�...��... ..........�.........�..�........� DRAINAGE LAYER (WASHED. NO FINES) 12" MIN INFILTRATION PIPE '7 24" MIN SEPARATION TO PROFILE VIEW SEASONAL HIGH WATER TABLE/BEDROCK TRENCH DRAIN DROP CURB INLET ROADWAY STABILIZED PRETREATMENT OPTION 1: GASION BASKET `—DRAINAGE FILTER FABRIC SECTION A-A VIEW Figure 5.38 Tree Trench Surface Flow(RR-3) Chapter 5:Runoff Reduction Techniques 5-40 5.3.3.1 Feasibility • Tree species selection shall take overhead and underground utilities into consideration, where applicable. • Ideally, the tree root ball will be placed on native subsoil to prevent sinking. In scenarios requiring filter media to be placed below the root ball, it is recommended that media be hand tamped in 6-inch lifts based on the size of the root ball. Consultation with a Landscape Architect is recommended under these scenarios. • Tree pits and tree trenches may be applied as practices for urban stormwater management(see Chapter 8). • Conserved existing trees shall be non-invasive, healthy trees with a root system that will not be impacted by the proposed development. • Tree pits with more than one tree per pit shall have underlying soils with an infiltration rate greater than or equal to 0.50 inch/hr, as confirmed by required geotechnical testing (see Appendix D), unless underdrains are provided. • Tree trenches shall not be used unless the underlying soils have an infiltration rate greater than or equal to 0.50 inch/hr, as confirmed by required geotechnical testing (see Appendix D). • Tree trenches and tree pits with more than one tree per pit shall have a 2 ft min. separation to the seasonal high water table and bedrock, including sound bedrock, fractured bedrock or karst geology. • Tree trenches, tree pits and tree plantings shall not be used to treat stormwater hotspots. • In areas of known contamination, or if contamination is discovered during excavation, contaminant levels must be evaluated by a qualified professional and state remediation program to determine if infiltration is permitted. • Tree plantings are not applicable if credit for another area reduction practice is already being taken for the same area. • Tree pits designed adjacent to public or private roadways shall have a maximum spacing of 30 ft on center. • Tree trenches shall meet the separation requirements as listed in Table 5.8. Vertical separation shall be taken from the bottom of the stone drainage layer. Horizontal separation shall be taken from the closest side of the filter media. Table .. Vertical Separation Horizontal Separation Structures Structures With Design Seasonal High Bedrock'.2 Without Foundation Water Supply Septic Variant Water Table'-2 Foundation Waterproofing° WelllReservoir System3.6 Waterproofing Tree Trench 2ft 2ft loft Oft 100 ft 50 ft 'Sound bedrock,fractured bedrock or karst geology as documented by on-site soil testing. 24 ft in sole source aquifers. 'Septic systems are inclusive of distribution boxes and absorption fields. `Separation requirements shown are specific to the soil media.Trees shall be appropriately set back from structures. 'If underdrains are proposed,minimum setback shall be 100 ft. 5.3.3.2 Conveyance • Stormwater runoff shall be intercepted near the source and conveyed to the practice as sheet flow or concentrated flow with a flow dissipater upon entrance into the practice. • Runoff from adjacent building roofs can be captured and directed into tree trenches. Roof drains shall discharge at the surface of the tree trench or connect to a storm sewer structure for flow dissipation, prior to entering the tree trench. Direct connections to the subsurface infiltration pipe are not permitted. Adequate pretreatment shall be provided. • Tree pit underdrain systems shall be designed to create an internal water storage using one of the following methods: Chapter 5:Runoff Reduction Techniques 5-41 Provide an upturned elbow, set 10 inches above the bottom of practice (Refer to Appendix C)I Set the outlet pipe invert, at the outlet control structure, 10 inches above the bottom of practice; or Increase the drainage layer depth to provide 8 inches of stone below the underdrain. • Tree trenches shall be equipped with a subsurface infiltration reservoir, below the soil media, consisting of a 12 inch minimum perforated pipe (infiltration pipe) embedded within a stone drainage layer. The stone drainage layer shall be extended a minimum of 12 inches on all sides of the infiltration pipe. Alternatively, approved proprietary underground infiltration systems, meeting the design criteria in Section 6.3, may be used in place of the infiltration pipe. • Tree trenches shall have a subsurface emergency overflow pipe within an outlet control structure and the invert shall be set at or above the top of the infiltration pipe. 5.3.3.3 Treatment 5.3.3.3.1 Design Criteria • Flush curbs shall only be used around tree pits and tree trenches if pedestrian protection fencing is installed around the perimeter of the practice. • For tree pits and tree trenches, where the open surface area does not meet the filter media minimum width or length requirements, the filter media shall extend to meet the minimum dimensions beneath the adjacent hardscape. The portion of the filter media that extends beneath hardscape surfaces shall be substituted with a structural filter media meeting the requirements in Table 5.9. • Tree plantings, pits and trenches shall meet the following design requirements: Table 5.9 Design Criteria for Tree Plantings, Pits and Trenches Design Criteria Tree Trenches Tree Pits Tree Plantings Maximum Slope of o Contributing Area 10/o Tree Species Species shall be chosen from Chapter 11 or a local list of native species Minimum Size—New Deciduous trees:2-inch caliper Trees Evergreen trees: 6 ft. height Minimum Size— Deciduous trees:2-inch caliper Existing Trees Evergreen trees:6 ft. height Minimum Tree Spacing 10 ft.O.C. N/A N/A Maximum Horizontal Separation from loft Contributing Impervious Area—New Trees Maximum Horizontal Separation from Canopy within 20 ft Contributing Impervious Area—Existing Trees Chapter 5:Runoff Reduction Techniques 5-42 • Tree pits and Tree Trenches shall consist of the following design specifications: DesignTable 5.10 Tree Pit& Tree Trench • Tree Trenches Tree Pits Tree Planting Ponding' Depth 6 inch max. below lowest inlet Surface Depth 3 inch min.for new plantings Layer' Material Shredded Hardwood Mulch Applicability As Required N/A Structural Depth Per Manufacturer N/A Filter Media Material CU-Structural Soil'or demonstrated equivalent;or Modular soil cell system infilled with filter media Depth 36 inches min. Width 5 ft min. Filter Media' Length Determined by available space 5 ft min. ASTM C-33 Sand:60%-75% Material Topsoil3:25%-40% Common planting soil Applicability Required Required N/A 6 inch min.without Drainage Depth 24 inch min. underdrain N/A Layer 10 inch min.with underdrain Material No. 2 stone,washed, no fines AASHTO No. 57 stone, N/A washed, no fines Applicability Required Required N/A Drainage Filter Fabric Materia12 Non-woven, polypropylene geotextiie with flow rate greater than 125 gpm/sf(ASTM D4491)and Apparent Opening Size US#70 sieve(ASTM D4751) Infiltration Applicability Required N/A N/A Pipe Material 12"min. perforated PVC or HDPE laid level or approved underground proprietary practice Applicability N/A As Required N/A Underdrain Material 6"perforated PVC or HDPE laid at 0.5%slope min.at 30 ft max. O.C. Footnotes: 'Required for all Design Variants 2Or acceptable alternatives,such as a 3 inch minimum layer of pea gravel 'Topsoil shall conform to NYSDOT Standard Specification 713-01 for Roadside Mix or Specialty Planting Mix. Construction Requirements • Heavy equipment traffic must be limited in the vicinity of both existing and proposed tree planting areas. • Where existing trees are proposed as tree plantings, the design development and construction process must: Inventory existing trees on-site; Identify trees to be protected, Protect the identified trees and surrounding soils during construction by limiting clearing, grading and compaction within the drip line of the canopy; and Protect and maintain identified trees post-construction. Chapter 5:Runoff Reduction Techniques 5-43 5.3.3.3.2 Sizing Criteria Area Reduction (Tree Planting) • Credit for impervious area reduction shall be the following: Mature tree canopy less than 16 ft diameter: half the area of the tree canopy. Mature tree canopy greater than or equal to 16 ft diameter: 100 SF per tree. • When computing the required water quality volume to a given design point, subtract the impervious area contributing by sheet flow, to an existing or new tree, from the total contributing impervious area. • Reduced areas are not deducted when calculating quantity controls for larger storms. Volume Reduction (Tree Pit/Tree Trench) • Depth of stone reservoir shall be designed to account for the total tributary area, in-situ soil characteristics, as well as water quality volume and quantity control requirements. Systems shall be designed to ensure that the peak water surface elevation for the 10-year, 24-hr design storm does not overtop the system and shall safely convey runoff from greater storm events. • The depth of soil media shall be sized, based on the principles of Darcy's Law, to treat the WQv for the surface discharge tributary to each tree pit/trench. The filter area shall be sized based on the principles of Darcy's Law. Calculate the minimum bottom area: __ (WQ„)(df) Af (k)(hf+df)(tf� Where: Af= Filter area (sf) WQv=Water Quality Volume(cf) df= Depth of filter(ft) k= Permeability flow rate of filter media (1 ft/day) hf=Average height of ponding (ft) (0.5 ft max.) tf= Maximum filter bed drain time(2 days) 5.3.3.4 Landscaping • For planting guidance for stormwater management facilities, refer to Chapter 11. • Permanent vegetative cover shall achieve 80% uniform density established over the entire contributing pervious area, before runoff is directed into the facility. Chapter 5:Runoff Reduction Techniques 5-44 Fact Sheet: Tree Planting/Tree Pit/Tree Trench (RR-3) Description: Tree planting is an area reduction practice using existing or newly planted trees. Tree pits are a volume reduction practice using trees planted in contained areas. } FEASIBILITY STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SUITABILITY • Tree plantings are not applicable if credit for another area reduction • Water Quality practice is already being taken for the same area • Trees shall be non-invasive and not be disturbed during construction Channel Protection • Tree pits shall have underlying soils with an infiltrate greater than or equal • Overbank Flood Protection to 0.50 inch/hr, unless underdrains are provided • Extreme Flood Protection • Tree trenches shall have underlying soils with an infiltration rate greater than or equal to 0.50 inch/hr O Runoff Reduction • Tree trenches and tree pits shall have a 2 ft min. separation to the • seasonal high water table and bedrock Treatment of Hotspots • Overhead clearance shall be taken into consideration when selecting tree Linear Applications species CONVEYANCE ✓suitable for this practice IMPLEMENTATION CONSIDERATIONS • Tree pit underdrain systems shall be designed to create an internal water storage Capital Cost • Tree trenches shall be equipped with a subsurface infiltration reservoir © Maintenance Burden • Stormwater runoff shall be intercepted near the source and conveyed to O the practice as sheet flow Safety Risk TREATMENT O Landscaping • The maximum slope of the contributing area is 10% L=Low M=Moderate H =High • The maximum horizontal separation from the contributing impervious area NA=Not Applicable is 10 ft(new trees)or within 20 ft of the canopy(existing trees) • Drainage filter fabric shall separate and wrap the soil media and stone POLLUTANT REMOVAL(See Table 10.4) drainage layer of tree trenches 10 Phosphorus • For area reduction subtract the total area contributing by sheet flow to an existing or new tree from the total area when computing WQv O Nitrogen • For volume reduction, systems should ensure that the peak water surface © Metals elevation for the 10-year,24-hr design storm does not overtop the system OPathogens O Total Suspended Solids G=Good F=Fair P= Poor RUNOFF REDUCTION CREDIT • 100%area reduction towards RRv(plantings) • 100%RRv provided(trenches and pits) • 40%RRv provided(tree pits with underdrains) Chapter 5:Runoff Reduction Techniques 5-45 EXHIBIT D Filtration Bioretention (F-5) Filtration bioretention areas are shallow stormwater control that utilize vegetation and engineered filter media to capture and treat stormwater runoff, then return it to the conveyance system through a perforated underdrain system. OVERFLOW STRUCTURES �_`�/..� AAl �''n.. :_:/,^• j•..t,: �,.,Y PRETREATMENT K� �!"'V X'4 GRASS FILTER STRIP i4'+u^ 1 ^r'�fiti' "a3i 6" MIN PVC `i< ,0 PERFORATED F '• i ' :$+.%'.+' t*tht UNDERDRAIN P J1�1 f'�N Yr'S��'i�:ri 4 •1:''n'�'�'r.�l'�.�'7 ? I PEA GRAVEL DIAPHRAGM i%,;� �! +.�`"� '1 '•} i 18" MIN WIDTH z,i«'•.• j., t.►Y'r 24" MIN DEPTH OUTLET PIPE PLAN VIEW LARGER STORM OVERFLOW STRUCTURE MAX PONDING PRETREATMENT GRASS FILTER STRIP GRATE INLET SET AT WOV DEPTH=18" PONDING DEPTH WATER QUALITY PAVEMENT MAX PONDING EPTH=12" PRETREATMENT GRAVEL5�r.� DIAPHRAGM MEDI y'• +,2.5-4' r, A 3" MIN SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH Vic.. _+ ••r �" ,'? 10" MIN NO 57 STONE DRAINAGE ————— —— LAYER (WASHED, NO FINES) DRAINAGE FILTER FABRIC UNDISTURBED EARTH 24" MIN OUTLET PIPE BEYOND SEPARATION TO SEASONAL 6" MIN PVC PERFORATED UNDERDRAIN HIGH WATER TABLE/ BEDROCK SECTION A-A VIEW Figure 6.20 Filtration Bioretention (F-5) Chapter 6:Standard Stormwater Management Practices 6-55 EXHIBIT E Infiltration Trench (1-1) Infiltration trenches are excavated trenches filled with stone, designed to capture and temporarily store runoff in the stone reservoir, where it exfiltrates into the surrounding native soils. COMPACTED EARTHEN BERM A A LENGTH OVERFLOW AS 0 WEIR, WIDTH REQUIRED VARIES PRETREATMENT GRASS FILTER STRIP OBSERVATION WELL WITH LOCKABLE CAP PLAN VIEW PRETREATMENT GRASS FILTER STRIP ALTERNATIVE SURFACE 6" PVC PERFORATED TREATMENT WITH OBSERVATION KILL CONTRIBUTING TOPSOIL AND LAWN IMPERVIOUS COMPACTED SURFACE EARTHEN BERM 0 1 ---- 0 ------ 0 i� I F 4" PEA GRAVEL I 0 0 I DRAINAGE FILTER I 0 I FABRIC 0 I 4'-0" NO. 2 STONE RESERVOIR I 0 I MAX (WASHED, NO FINES) I 0 I 0 I I 0 I FOOT PLATE 7 24" MIN SEPARATION TO SEASONAL HIGH WATER TABLE/BEDROCK SECTION A-A VIEW Figure 6.11 Infiltration Trench (1-1) Chapter 6:Standard Stormwater Management Practices 6-36 EXHIBIT F Table 6.14 Stormwater Filtering Design Specifications F-1 F-2 F-3 F-4 F-5 F-6 Applicability N/A N/A N/A As Required As Required Required Pea Gravel Depth 24 inch min. Diaphragm -- Material ASTM D448 No.6 Stone, Porosity=32% Applicability Required Required Required Required I Required N/A Ponding 12 inch max.(WQv) Depth 18 inch max.(Extreme Flood) Applicability Optional Required N/A Required j Required I N/A Depth 3 inch min. Choker Course: Surface Layer AASHTO Shredded Hardwood Mulch Material Topsoil No. 57 N/A or Non-Invasive Living N/A stone, Mulch washed, no fines Depth 18-24 inch 12-24 inch 30-48 inch 12 inch min. Standard ASTM C-33 Sand:60%-75% Filter Media Material Topsoil°:25%-40% Blend of Stone, Sand:ASTM C-33 concrete sand ASTM C-33 Sand:85%-95% Perlite, Dolomite, EnhaMatenaled Topsoil/Organics:5%-15% Gypsumz P-Index: 12 to 30 Drainage Depth 10 inch j 6 inch I 10 inch a14 inch Layer' Material AASHTO No. 57 stone,washed, no fines Applicability Required Required Required N/A Required Required Underdrain 6"perforated PVC or HDPE laid at 0%slope at 30 ft max. O.C.with internal water storage; Material in all other cases,6"perforated PVC or HDPE laid at 0.5%slope min.at 30 ft max.O.C. Drainage Filter Applicability Required Required Required Required IRequired IRequired Fabric Materials Non-woven, polypropylene geotextile with flow rate greater than 125 gpm/sf(ASTM D4491) and Apparent Opening Size US#70 sieve(ASTM D4751) Applicability As Required 7 N/A I N/A N/A As Required As Required Impermeable 12-24 inch of clay soil(min.50%passing#200 sieve and max.permeability 1 x 10-5 Liner Material cm/sec) or 40 mil HDPE geomembrane Slope 15%max. Maintenance Width 12 ft.min. Access' Material Able to withstand loading from maintenance equipment and vehicles Footnotes: Required for all Design Variants Design Variant F-6: • Stone:No.89,no recycled material,non-limestone material mineral aggregate • Periite:Agricultural grade,free of toxic materials(0-30%passing No.18 Sieve,0-10%passing No.30 Sieve)1 cy/3 cy of stone • Dolomite:CaMg(CO3)2(calcium magnesium carbonate)Agricultural grade,free of toxic materials(100%passing No.8 Sieve,0% passing No.16 Sieve)10 Ibs/cy perlite • Gypsum:CaSO4.2H2O(hydrated calcium sulfate).Non-calcined,agricultural grade,free of toxic materials(100%passing No.8 Sieve, 0%passing No.16 Sieve)1.5 Ib/cy perlite 'Enhanced Filter Media shall be used within watersheds requiring enhanced phosphorus removal.Refer to Chapter 4 for impaired watershed information. 'Topsoil shall conform to NYSDOT Standard Specification 713-01 for Roadside Mix or Specialty Planting Mix. 5For Designs F-4 and F-5,the organic component shall not consist of compost. 'Or acceptable alternatives,such as a 3 inch minimum layer of pea gravel Chapter 6:Standard Stormwater Management Practices 6-61 Table • • Design Specifications F-1 F-2 F-3 F-4 F-5 F-6 Applicability N/A N/A N/A As Required As Required Required Pea Gravel Diaphragm Depth 24 inch min. Material ASTM D448 No.6 Stone, Porosity=32% Applicability Required Required Required I Required I Required N/A Ponding 12 inch max.(Mv) Depth 18 inch max. (Extreme Flood) Applicability Optional Required N/A Required I Required N/A Depth 3 inch min. Choker Course: Surface Layer AASHTO Shredded Hardwood Mulch Material Topsoil No. 57 N/A or Non-Invasive Living N/A stone, Mulch washed, no fines Depth 18-24 inch 12-24 inch 30-48 inch 12 inch min. Standard ASTM C-33 Sand:60%-75% Filter Media Material Topsoil^:25%-40% Blend of Stone, Sand:ASTM C-33 concrete sand ASTM C-33 Sand:85%-95% Perlite,Dolomite, Enhanced Topsoil/Organics:5%-15% Gyps Uri Material P-Index: 12 to 30 Drainage Depth 10 inch 6 inch 10 inch z14 inch Layer' Material AASHTO No.57 stone,washed, no fines Applicability Required Required Required N/A Required Required Underdrain 6"perforated PVC or HDPE laid at 0% slope at 30 ft max. O.C.with internal water storage; Material in all other cases,6"perforated PVC or HDPE laid at 0.5%slope min.at 30 ft max.O.C. Drainage Filter Applicability Required I Required I Required Required Required Required Fabric Material6 Non-woven, polypropylene geotextile with flow rate greater than 125 gpm/sf(ASTM D4491) and Apparent Opening Size US#70 sieve(ASTM D4751) Applicability As Required N/A I N/A I N/A I As Required I As Required Impermeable 12-24 inch of clay soil(min. 50%passing#200 sieve and max. permeability 1 x 10-5 Liner Material cm/sec) or 40 mil HDPE geomembrane Slope 15%max. Maintenance Width 12 ft. min. Access' Material Able to withstand loading from maintenance equipment and vehicles Footnotes: 'Required for all Design Variants 2Design Variant F-6: • Stone:No.89,no recycled material,non-limestone material mineral aggregate • Pedite:Agricultural grade,free of toxic materials(0-30%passing No.18 Sieve,0-10%passing No.30 Sieve)1 cy/3 cy of stone • Dolomite:CaMg(CO3)2(calcium magnesium carbonate)Agricultural grade,free of toxic materials(100%passing No.8 Sieve.0% passing No.16 Sieve)10 Ibs/cy perlite • Gypsum:CaSO4.2112O(hydrated calcium sulfate).Non-calcined,agricultural grade,free of toxic materials(100%passing No.8 Sieve, 0%passing No.16 Sieve)1.5 Ib/cy perlite 'Enhanced Filter Media shall be used within watersheds requiring enhanced phosphorus removal. Refer to Chapter 4 for impaired watershed information. 'Topsoil shall conform to NYSDOT Standard Specification 713-01 for Roadside Mix or Specialty Planting Mix. 5For Designs F-4 and F-5,the organic component shall not consist of compost. 60r acceptable alternatives,such as a 3 inch minimum layer of pea gravel Chapter 6:Standard Stormwater Management Practices 6-61 EXHIBIT G y •� M♦ -�,� i•;.`• r y�/J ,ram' shutterstock.com•2515962531 Sri fir'j'�;'.-i='�:'. i��'-::.'• Al b Aar it � I'i� : •: K:' t�. Lauren McMahon Project Engineer LANGAN Direct: 914.323.7422 2 •''�' i i � ; STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK PLANNING BOARD ---------------------------------------------------------------x In the Matter of the Application of Kingfield Planning Board Meeting Date: Lot Owners Association,Inc.to Amend Approved September 11,2025 at 6:3Q 1?1ltl<._ Site Plan, ------------------------------------- . ---------------------- -x D � LJ h STATE OF NEW YORK ) AUG 2 9 2 225 0 ss.. COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER ) VILLAGE O�1D,yE BROOK BUILDING DEPARTMENT ERIC STEILMAN,being duly sworn,deposes and says: 1.1 am over the age of 18 years. I reside in Westchester County,New York. I have personal knowledge of the facts and circumstances set forth herein. I submit this affidavit in connection with the application of the Kingfield Lot Owners Association, Inc.("Kingfield")to amend its site plan. 2.On August 26,2025,I placed a public notice sign on the referenced property adjacent to the Kingfield clubhouse at I Rose Lane, in the Village of Rye Brook. 3. I have posted public notice signs on numerous occasions in the Village of Rye Brook and am familiar with the requirements of the Village Code with respect to public notice signs. 4.The sign was intended to comply with the notification requirements of Village Code Section 250-40(A). The sign was posted more than seven days prior to the continued public hearing by the Planning Board on the captioned matter, in compliance with Code Section 250-40(Axl)(b). The sign complied with the format requirements of Village Code Section 25 - 0 2). RIC STEILMAN Sworn to before me thiey of August, 5. N CARLOS A GONZALEZ Notary Public•Stag of Now York No.01GO6435350 Qualified In westchestar county My COMMINlon Explrss.tun 27,2026 Tara Orlando From: David Gelfarb<gelfarb@mosskahsh.com> Sent: Monday, August 4,2025 5:36 P;NI To: Tara Orlando Cc: rzitt@kblaw.com;Jennifer Grai Subject: RE:Kingfield Lot Owners.Association,Inc.August 14,2025 Planning Board;Meeting Hi Tara: Good afternoon. We are the attorneys for Kingfield Lot Owners Association, Inc. ("Kingfield"). Kingfield requests that the public hearing on its application that is presently before the Planning Board be adjourned from the August 10, 2025 meeting to the September 11, 2025. Thank you for your attention to this matter and Kingfield looks forward to appearing before the Planning Board on September 11tn Thanks, David DAVID (fieL_FAR3,, >✓5Q, Moss& Kalish, PLLC 122 East 42"d Street Suite 2100 New York, New York 10168 (212) 867-4488 (Office) (917) 817-8046 (Mobile) (212)983-5276 (Fax) CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this e-mail is attorney privileged and confidential information. It is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient,you are notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, electronic storage or use of this communication is prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, attaching the original message, and delete the original message from your computer, and any network to which your computer is connected. Communications from our firm contain or incorporate federal tax advice. Under recently promulgated US Internal Revenue Service (IRS) standards, we are required to inform you that only formal,written tax opinions meeting IRS requirements may be relied upon by taxpayers for the purpose of avoiding tax-related penalties. Accordingly,this communication is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding tax-related penalties under the Internal Revenue Code. 1 D C C IE ME J U L - 9 2025 STATE OF NEW YORK VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER BUILDING DEPARTMENT VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK PLANNING BOARD -------------------------------------------------------------X In the Matter of the Application of Kingfield Planning Board Meeting Date: Lot Owners Association,Inc.to Amend Approved July 10, 2025 at 6:30 P.M. Site Plan, -----------------—-------------—---------------—---------X STATE OF NEW YORK ) ) ss.: COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER ) ERIC STEILMAN,being duly sworn,deposes and says: 1. I am over the age of 18 years. I reside in Westchester County,New York.I have personal knowledge of the facts and circumstances set forth herein.I submit this affidavit in connection with the application of the Kingfield Lot Owners Association,Inc. ("Kingfield")to amend its site plan. 2.On June 26,20251 placed a public notice sign on the referenced property adjacent to the Kingfield clubhouse at 1 Rose Lane,in the Village of Rye Brook. 3. I have posted public notice signs on numerous occasions in the Village of Rye Brook and am familiar with the requirements of the Village Code with respect to public notice signs. 4. The sign was intended to comply with the notification requirements of Village Code Section 250-40(A).The sign was posted more than seven days prior to the initial public hearing by the Planning Board on the captioned matter, in compliance with Code Section 250-40(A)(1)(b). The sign complied with the format requirements of Village Code Section 250-40(A)(2). J. C STEILMAN Swom to before me thisO �day of JuLy,20 5, HELEN KATSIHTIS NOTARY PUBLIC-STATE OF NEW YORK No.01KA8188388 Notary Public Qualified in Westchester County My Commlislon Explrse 08-26.2027 RJ11N -5 2025 CC EME STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK PLANNING BOARD BUILDING DEPARTMENT ---------------------------------------------------------------------------X In the Matter of the Application of Kingfield Lot Owners Association, Inc. Planning Board Public Hearing Date: to Amend Approved Site Plan, June 12, 2025 at 6:30 P.M. ----------------------------------------------------------------X STATE OF NEW YORK ) ) ss.. COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER ) DAVID B. GELFARB, being duly sworn, deposes and says: 1. I am over the age of 18 years. I reside in Westchester County,New York. I have personal knowledge of the facts and circumstances set forth herein. I submit this affidavit in connection with the application of the Kingfield Lot Owners Association, Inc. ("Kingfield")to amend the site plan. I am the attorney for Kingfield in connection with the within application. 2. On May 27, 2025 I directed the mailing of a notice to the owner of each property within the notification area defined in Rye Brook Village Code 250-40B(2). Each such notice was sent by prepaid first class mail at least 10 days before the initial public hearing in this matter. 3. As is set forth in the above caption, the public hearing in this matter is scheduled for June 12, 2025 at 6:30 P.M. The notification consisted of a description of the location of the property that is the subject of the public hearing, the proposed action, the permits applied for and the date and time of the hearing. i 4. Pursuant to Rye Brook Village Code 250-40B(6), enclosed herewith is an area map, public notification list and one sample of the material included in the mailing. DAVID B. GEL fARB Sworn to before me this 5`b day of June,2025. ublic EFFTEDIRIGK A.BECKERBLIC,STATE CF NEW YORKration No.02BE476669) /ied in New York�� 202n Ex res 2 1100 King Associates LLC Elly Christina Pateras Joan S. Scherz Revocable 200 Madison Ave FI 26th 1 Jasmine Ln Joan S. Scherz New York, NY 10016 Rye Brook, NY 10573 6 Rose Ln Rye Brook, NY 10573 Adekunbi Sijuwade Eric A. Bickler John Trace Olamide Odubogun 18 Rose Ln Georgette Trace 11 Rose Ln Rye Brook, NY 10573 9 Rose Ln Rye Brook, NY 10573 Rye Brook, NY 10573 Alexis Cloud Genesis Reyes Vasquez Jordan Crames 19 Gardenia Ln 17 Gardenia Ln Maureen Crames Rye Brook, NY 10573 Rye Brook, NY 10573 15 Jasmine Ln Rye Brook, NY 10573 Angel J. Torices Degolla Glen Gable Realty LLC Jose Nunez Jeannette A. Romero 19 Avon Rd Madelin Almanzar 3 Gardenia Ln Larchmont, NY 10538 14 Rose Ln Rye Brook, NY 10573 Rye Brook, NY 10573 Anthony Casubolo Goldstein Family Trust Alexandra Sanchez Robert Silber 3 Gardenia Ln 1 La Cruz 5 Rose Ln 16 Rose Ln G Rye Brook, NY 10573 Rye Brook, NY 10573 Rye Brook, NY 10573 Banafsheh Pirasteh David M. Paragamian Hannah M. Badain Lori Discolo Ln 11 Gardenia Ln 16 Lavender Ln 21 Jasmine Rye Brook, Ln 10573 Rye Brook, NY 10573 Rye Brook, NY 10573 Barbara L. Goodman Hayley Romer Mary DeVivo Gary R. Goodman Adam J.Schoeberg John S.Turtz 25 Jasmine Ln 19 Jasmine Ln 7 Jasmine Ln Rye Brook, NY 10573 Rye Brook, NY 10573 Rye Brook, NY 10573 Charles H. Shoneman Ingeborg C.Aerts Matthew B.Anderson Merle Gordon Shoneman Daniel J. Young Denitza Anderson 23 Jasmine Ln 13 Rose Ln 22 Rose Ln Rye Brook, NY 10573 Rye Brook, NY 10573 Rye Brook, NY 10573 Chelsea Erin Richardson Jamie A. Arboleda Michael G Pistilli 2021 T Gordon Lan Richardson Lilian R. Ortiz Jamie G. Pistilli 17 Jasmine Ln 5 Gardenia Ln 15 Rose Ln Rye Brook, NY 10573 Rye Brook, NY 10573 Rye Brook, NY 10573 Cheryl Kestnbaum Jessica Wang Michael Peca David Kestnbaum Grant Neil Brown Kristin Peca 5 Jasmine Ln 18 Lavender Ln 27 Lavender Ln Rye Brook, NY 10573 Rye Brook, NY 10573 Rye Brook, NY 10573 Mindi Steinberg Takeya Bobo-Thomas Elliot Rick Steinberg Herman P.Thomas 7 Rose Ln 9 Gardenia Ln Rye Brook, NY 10573 Rye Brook, NY 10573 Nicole Garrett Thomas Dassatti 1 Gardenia Ln Ilaina Dassatti Rye Brook, NY 10573 13 Jasmine Ln Rye Brook, NY 10573 Nicole Neira Valerie Polera Jorge Arbesu Cardona 10 Rose Ln 3 Jasmine Ln Rye Brook, NY 10573 Rye Brook, NY 10573 Phillip Boeding Victor H. Arriaga Espinoz Nicole S.Adams 7 Gardenia Ln 25 Lavender Ln Rye Brook, NY 10573 Rye Brook, NY 10573 Rodrigo Pavani Zynnette Fernandez Danielle Mazziero Macedo 15 Gardenia Ln 20 Rose Ln Rye Brook, NY 10573 Rye Brook, NY 10573 Ronald Mraz 11 Jasmine Ln Rye Brook, NY 10573 Samantha Kesten 9 Jasmine Ln Rye Brook, NY 10573 Sapankumar K. Mandloi Rupalben R. Desai 12 Rose Ln Rye Brook, NY 10573 Shannon E. Lombardo James P. Lombardo 7 Portwalk PI Apt 1329 Portsmouth, NH 03801 Susan Golden Owen Golden 8 Rose Ln Rye Brook, NY 10573 14 Rose Lane w f " Rye Brook, NY Technologies 1 inch = 143 Feet 5 www.cai-tech.com April 15, 2025 0 143 286 429 r° 'A rb r,v \ 1 +rr ,15 +x �4 a �o n� 1 11 M fi. 1\1 Jl \ r I t a M ti� _ '•L 11 Ike 4. ss t3 60 .. C S 5� ,tt-..• 1 u l . 1,91 R I , 1!t 1N J 5j 14*4t ,M ,k ,a• :59 f 1M a • Nil.: Harrison ti s Data shown on this mop is provided for planning and informational purposes only.The municipalily and CAI Technologies are not responsible for any use for other purposes or misuse or misrepresentation of this map. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that a public hearing for a Site Plan Amendment Application will be held by the Village of Rye Brook Planning Board on June 12, 2025 at 6:30 PM at Rye Brook Village Hall, 938 King Street, Rye Brook, New York. The property that is subject to the within public hearing is the Kingfield development. The Kingfield development is located at 1100 King Street in Rye Brook, New York. The subject of the public hearing is the application of the Kingfield Lot Owners Association, Inc. to the Village of Rye Brook to authorize a "swap" or "trade" of 4,835 square feet of unused impervious surface square coverage from the common area of Kingfield to the homeowners to use in connection with their patios, decks, walkways or other impervious surfaces. If you have any questions, please contact David Gelfarb, Esq. at 212 867 4488 or gelfarb@mosskalish.com. p EC ENE .11.1 N -5 2025 1 DD STATE OF NEW YORK VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER BUILDING DEPARTMENT VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK PLANNING BOARD -----------------------------------------------------------X In the Matter of the Application of Kingfield Planning Board Meeting Date: Lot Owners Association,Inc.to Amend Approved June 12,2025 at 6:30 P.M. Site Plan, -------------------------------------------------------------X 1 STATE OF NEW YORK ) i ) s�� COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER ) ERIC STEILMAN,being duly sworn,deposes and says: 1.I am over the age of 18 years. I reside in Westchester County,New York.1 have personal knowledge of the facts and circumstances set forth herein.I submit this affidavit in connection with the application of the Kingfield Lot Owners Association,Inc.("Kingfield")to amend its site plan. . 2.On May 29,2025 I placed a public notice sign on the referenced property adjacent to the Kingfield clubhouse at 1 Rose Lane,in the Village of Rye Brook. 3. 1 have posted public notice signs on numerous occasions in the Village of Rye Brook and am familiar with the requirements of the Village Code with respect to public notice signs. 4.The sign was intended to comply with the notification requirements of Village Code Section 250-40(A).The sign was posted more than seven days prior to the initial public hearing by the Planning Board on the captioned matter, in compliance with Code Section 250- 40(Axl)(b). The sign complied with the format requirements of Village Code Section 250- 40(Ax2) I ,• /1,11111,/,, , I v p�•, ERIC STEILMAN Sworn to before me this da of June,2025. .J -•y - _ I%: No u Ile,state of NOW Y" r O No. O3AN626 = Qaallfled In WMtchmW . .. QaR�allll�A�pMM.MNalLaslG�i' ///j 1111111111,, r s RECEIVED MAY - 9 2025 May 8, 2025 Adopted 4-0 VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE RESOLUTION SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING AMENDED PUD SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR KINGFIELD LOT OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK PLANNING BOARD WHEREAS, the Applicant, the Kingfield Lot Owners Association, Inc., submitted an application for approval of an Amended PUD Site Plan involving installation of additional impervious surfaces (patio expansions) on the property located at 2 Rose Lane, SBL 129.25-1-1 on the Town of Rye Tax Map in the Planned Unit Development ("PUD") District; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Planning Board of the Village of Rye Brook will hold a public hearing on June 12, 2025 at 6:30 p.m. in Village Hall, 938 King Street, Rye Brook, New York to consider the above-referenced application; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Applicant is hereby directed to comply with Section 250-40 of the Village Code regarding notification of the public hearing. On motion by Mrs. Schoen, seconded by Mr. Richman, Mr. Nowak, Superintendent of Public Works, called the roll: MR. GRZAN Voting EXCUSED MR. MENDELSOHN Voting YES MR. RICHMAN Voting YES MRS. SCHOEN Voting YES CHAIRMAN GOODMAN Voting YES cdnc Nobkj -Tawo D I vyi � _3 Alfredo DiVitto From: Pateras, Elly C. <EIIy.Pateras@ellimanpm.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 6, 2025 3:18 PM To: Alfredo DiVitto Subject: FW: Kingfield - 1-3-5 Jasmine Lane Attachments: IMG_7622jpg; 1 Jasmine Lane- Inspection report-ss-.pdf, IMG_7539 jpg; IMG_7541 jpg; IMG_7538jpg From: Pateras, Elly C. Sent:Tuesday, May 6, 2025 3:08 PM To: 'adivitto@ryebrook.org'<adivitto@ryebrook.org> Cc: nicoleneirag@hotmail.com; mark@gordonappraisals.com Subject: Kingfield - 1-3-5 Jasmine Lane We write in anticipation of the town hall meeting on Thursday. My neighbors and I are concerned about the drainage plan behind our homes.The landscaping which was not completed by the Developer. We are also concerned with pooling water. Attached is a photo of the water not draining properly behind 1 Jasmine and a report that I obtained from an engineer.Also attached are photos of the back area of our homes taken in the fall of 2024 which indicates that there is no growth there, and that the plantings on the original plans were not planted. Our goal is to make the Developer complete the work that they were obligated to do. Please let me know if you need additional information. I will be there on Thursday. Elly Pateas 917-952-9034 Disclaimer The information contained in this communication from the sender is confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and others authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in relation of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. This email has been scanned for viruses and malware, and may have been automatically archived by Mimecast Ltd, an innovator in Software as a Service (SaaS) for business. Providing a safer and more useful place for your human generated data. Specializing in; Security, archiving and compliance. To find out more Click Here. 1 i O K � a ♦t +�' r ^i 1, e, r.,' i. •t �� ``E�: 1J•,4'rj'1' `�� n'`• 1 /� y.1y, ,�'� �,j'-�.' + l'F � �� _cw + - ~'��.�! �y�. �''t y.� y :1, }.n,. ., : L' l�' r x ,1•�+�+ � Y �`r' '4Ci .' •A. �S`r \+, /Y� l � =•6C�c yYn��� sey��``.F � �.S¢ i t• i �- K- •1- , 'y7`',� "'rrr--nnnrrr � � - -- �• � 1 _ .. 't _ ��^�- {'')s V rs'1. 'l vif, ,+ •'-yam •.�' • �• ��� ,- � �'� {-.• if J �, _ �� "t ^ t .' P •r Vlt� �h,��Y `� K:, r• t ��'!y-1�q,t.+i. y -� N ri't ~ y ��� �.j.,t^t• � � ••? 1. I/ t '' ./�� �T .ram � ` + '1,• � `f '� � •'�' !�,,,,.+ ,T�J ^ 1!� �Yl ;�" t�/,. ;�.'L^'.- r \ •a �3' ~,"y +fig� � +��1'� ray r 1 � x. •� •, �"`lR1!�',tl \. ► �� Lo j C� .'ice• 77 sV i� fir. ,•l L t , i,.. � r,.r� �'.� f , r� � it` � - �✓_ .> L. U,1�4��` t�:�l•� it ix 71 It, •r.l�.�✓�V7f.•k J�� •4 I ;iy\_rt � ,� f '.4. �,'�:. ;3 -" - 1 '{� ( �}�� � 1 •tts�r�„' �v.�^kY/tt�li`yy,,'""!k V}��51�"a.;�,N*H'��f� c *- � ` �. V4"I 11 �,t - �=..rr '!.%.' ,r+ai' Ij 0, �o3. fi� } r.: r } ��il','"�+ {'r�.�.���t '' "3',cn ,"C cc'< , +a�C'✓��' t f;. �\ 9Y Y:t .'��,Y�•j y IlT. �M t17 9j3'��'S, ,',J•✓t�Y t�{ : . �;•, T- ti�! ��,`�-.�i"i,.'JS�.(.,,ry-vr��'' r1i^r � �i ','�'�•f'+'�c'"(,{,��vihltt y`���, e I y` , �O � J?, �{� ^ •, t �` t'fir,, �. ��,f r yrth-� l iy)�i-,�,� (e'. �• � q c -". to R. ,.�,11F - y,�rY ✓y.sF'.�i• ��"�, p� .^'�."''C,rr�t'}'.1 .'AJ-r s' .•` �3, 1��.. ' ���`' y, -K;- N�l(.� �, r 1.� ;•y i'Vtw ' �y...f... +ykr� �1r"�R1�ti w. '!�\. y�,�;� t'�•" �'Jya,�{ r.�r- v 1'' -'.,1 iY��l '� 6. f;.ag y��4-••y Y\ f�+1",C ♦ l�y!T '*-11!" �k'I.�'�'y,♦ r I � ',��♦'�♦' .�- Irk�VC 1 ti. ` �. S`,1�1 ' `� i •} -c �I�,y,q�L�,.(t � '',_�.. c •1y;.3F�S ���Y�� ��, �'i�.���MJJ. •Ut''`i j r\;v' - /p���""'rr. '*- i ;t ,.'�+,+`"��. •�•kq`'�,�s,.. jV�.':,ift`-' f`�� '�++ �c�rlj�+:\���5 •���?��j�!�''3�}7�i+ y�; � ,�, fi,`�_ ,� ; `.,► f _,a ♦ r\,'-..+ tiri: .'Yt'�� ''yam .(1 • �,`�#il".,r' Y j�"�4// � � _ �♦.,- ..ti' a♦i ♦✓ �'" - .f .Y` s f i•s 1 '..1 y ✓ i.fir"i¢i e '�'4 h`f .' ,,{ "'�'t tad i � •, , D, r. !:t�(� a c. •/`. 1�, q 1 ����� • '� �ST(,p`p4 i ! r,'� ' •1 gyp' , / Al pppp �.� :�' a11• ',,�, itj �`r 'l'' � +�������l. ��� .t�art.' � .�r•.. r L�\ 'T�`,yi (!J�'+ �) _ _ � ' �• 1i � `/` \•�� ;�#1;.� � t:�i'� t�r1-�. &fin, f ,� l�J.Yl; �q;11 �ti p ,� fQ{�,�,,5i(• q3' ���Ty}yw ���f��� Lr1 .� �I,f',�1�j�,.+�` c p ( F' y t it 1 1! '�• �;i- �,� r>• fi;F ,a i a q '`+ fit' p Mt '� ��'' - ` j +'•„f ��+►, �.`r#'�y; �� ��+� !��. �� 9 y�1..-CvN� c� r4F �,kf �+, ) ! � �� r r./, t{�.q��y7e i�� •�'. !Y r ,'�lr7�V�tly zt �'o���r�• � J p�/�i , i' , •�I tn9(tl'�dr;,�V�j �. �. ! C � 1,J 'f'.�'�Z�,i l i f��y � �, "{ '��" _ � `4 �.. ,� ,� 9AF• �p�`, �( � }` '� '1 ��� ",mil ��I .; n� ��n �• ,L' h r :,t..fc�r�b r,�•` rllj � ,a.�•']7(- �+.'. •.���- t'y�} r`�■�,.� �]' 1y: � �,C?. '� ��" e�e ,t.I`T•�p(«t3��kf r.�'+�•. �' ,1 ''r4 � , �e ( .r,,��, ..a fa ,r, 1 -i- � ` (��.i:�� ��!}RJ�4,i"'e. ,e'.�y � r,' t*`"'9•ri '4.�_ n ' *v)t+ 'ads rf•"'i + .v r'� "l ✓ ail':, �t`r c t 4 ��, ��♦ `� � ;�ac:� .' � r �c�7�51� � ri.aty a� �It °� �'' �i.�f1! A ,���� � �,�t � r ' f)��,j'�ly',j/�+ i�J r,Y �}!� r � � r y,�� �•� �� b , 't'' #, al'l%+`� �' i�s,�M�:YiGTl,7w '..`rW�, ,YJ��. ,�N�J\l1�\`ibP•R�:v.+a411iy'H.r`Yo:,'y",•+,?�v,'��'(�,'\ � . t af. .� '.. 4 ..h.'.».. Alfredo DiVitto From: mark@gordonappraisals.com Sent: Tuesday, May 6, 2025 9:09 AM To: Alfredo DiVitto Cc: Pateras, Elly C. Subject: Kingfield Landscaping for 1, 3 and 5 Jasmine Ln Hi Freddy, Thank you for your attention to this matter. My concerns regarding the landscaping or lack thereof behind 1, 3 and 5 Jasmine Lane or as follows: 1.) 1, 3 and 5 Jasmine Lane are the last 3 units built in this development that required landscaping behind the units. It appears to me that either the developer did not want to spend any more money after providing pine trees behind units 7-29 Jasmine Ln, (10 units)or the landscaper did not manage his budget properly. Either way,this appears to be a problem for the developer and not the homeowner. In my non-expert opinion,the lack of landscaping does not meet the site plan requirements. 2.) Aesthetically, it is just not pleasant to look at for 6 months of the year when the hill is barren. 3.) My question to the experts: Will the lack of landscaping on the hill behind our units cause erosion over time and effect the units above and behind our units? Thanks again for your help. Best regards, Mark Gordon Gordon Appraisal Services, LLC 5 Jasmine Ln Rye Brook, NY 10573 Ph: 908-654-7474; Fax: 908-654-3070; Cell: 908-358-3878 1 1 _ o El L-1uLJ Ed eAA a � w- ; v♦ 1 ��. a r �f i * , al` 1 .i �. � _ .�T�+� f ;yet+. !1�:�*- ,•' 5r. yyy ■ � ay�i k�l :j -�, t ��`i �� t•y-iY1 yam, �c���. `!Y t tr (a 10 4 �r. i J �..t� - ..yam � {� l�� I f y �I l" � � • Benedict A. Salanitro, P.E., P.C. Civil Engineer 609 Brook Street Mamaroneck,New York 10543 hsalanitroRilaol.rom Telephone(914)760-5125 11 April2025 Elly Pateras 1 Jasmine Lane �F�o`N Yo9 Rye Brook,NY 10573 ~. 0 RE: Inspection-water intrusion in rear basement wall S% REPORT I have performed a visual,non-destructive,examination of your exposed base ent wa Is where you have indicated the presence of moisture/water intrusion. I Have conducted an interior and exterior inspection and believe that the possible cause may be due to water allowed to exfiltrate from the underground roof leader piping and possibly causing excess water to remain along the foundation wall causing excessive saturation and water to find its way though the shrinkage cracking that is visible in the rear unfinished basement area. I also observed at least 2 leaders that are no longer connected to the underground piping that may cause roof water runoff to collect along the foundation. There are also signs of settlement in the rear yard that would also case the white drainage piping to become dislocated(especially since this piping is not glued at the joints). It appears there may be a 6"collection pipe that collects the roof runoff(possibly from adjacent homes as well)and is deposited to a rear yard concrete basin.This should be verified. It was also noted that no remediation work has been conducted along the rear yard(vegetated swale)properties that I had recommended in a prior report. Recommendations: (see below image for reference) 1. Televise all underground leader piping , make glued connections/repairs as needed. 2. Raise the planting beds along the foundation walls so water can shed away from the foundation and not puddle or accumulate. MA An, • Benedict A. Salanitro, P.E., P.C. Civil Engineer 609 Brook Street Mamaroneck,New York 10543 bsalanitroPaol.com Telephone(914)760-5125 August 5, 2023 Richard J. Smeriglio Vice President Plaza Realty & Management Corp. 1010 Hope Street P.O. Box 17010 Stamford, CT 06907 RE: Engineering Consultation- Kingfield Lot Owners Association REPORT, FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATION I have been asked to provide my on-site review of the existing Bioretention filter#4 located behind the homes identified as #'s 78,81,82,83,85,88,89,90,94,95,96,100,101,102 Jasmine Lane. I have conducted all on-site visual inspection and have reviewed the construction plans provided to me by Plaza Realty & Management Corp. The plans (last dated 11/3/17 revision #5) that have been reviewed are as follows: COVER SHEET ALTA/ACSM LAND TITLE SURVEY--_. SP-1.0 OVERALL SITE PLAN-------------------------- ------- V =80' SP-1.1 SITE LAYOUT PLAN------ ----------------------------- 1"=40' SP-2.0 GRADING& DRAINAGE PLAN------------------------ P= 40' SP-3.0 SITE UTILITY PLAN -OVERALL I"= 40' SP-3.1 TYPICAL UNIT PLAN -------------------- 1" = 10' SP-4.0 SITE LANDSCAPE PLAN - OVERALL__________________ I" =40' SP-4.1 SITE LANDSCAPE PLAN-TYPICAL UNIT/CLUBHOUSE- V _ 10' SP-5.0 EROSION& SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN_____--_______ I"—40' SP-5.1 EROSION &SEDIMENT CONTROL DETAILS__--_-____ AS SHOWN SP-6.0 SITE SECTIONSS------------------------------------ 1"= 10' SP-6.1 ROAD PROFILES.----------------------------------- AS SHOWN SP-6.2 WATER PROFILES__________________________________ AS SHOWN SP-6.3 SANITARY SEWER PROFILES-----------------------_ AS SHOWN SP-6.4 STORM SEWER PROFILES--.---__ --. ---- ..-. -----..._-_-- AS SHOWN SP-7.1 - SP-7.3 SITE DETAILS-------------------------------------- AS SHOWN SP-8.0 SITE LIGHTING PLAN------------------------------- AS SHOWN L-02 PLANTING, LIGHTING.WETLAND MITIGATION PLAN__ 1"= 50' (PLAN PREPARED BY XIPFP,LLC,MAY 25.2007 AND AS APPROVED BY THE VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK.INCLUDED AS PART OF THIS SITE PLAN APPLICATION1 1lPage y • Of particular concern is the lack of plant growth, erosive surfaces, lack of stone and the aesthetic value of the area behind the above aforementioned homes. The bio-retention filter#4, as identified on the above plans, was created in similar fashion to the other bioretention filers with a variety of stone lined channels, underdrain piping and ornamental grasses and "Stonnwater Management Area"wetland seed mix. The details for these bioretention filters are shown below: _ tY 3•L' 1:' T1�1 I =11 - I ? _I�j�n FILTER FADR:O MIWI 160N IOR ECUALI �— E•DEEP STONE DED OR AS SPECIFIED ON P:AN 4'TRAPROCR a•PERFORATE,UNDERORAIN —� WERE 0H0\VN ON PLAN ^.EE DETAIL 11 THIS 3YE Ell STONE SWALE SCALE:N.T.S. I' 2 1 P a g e 1 I- y yI 2A I, I• SfEFI yr NIN. ;7 MIN I EDGE OF SAVE VENT S r \ TURF P.EINFORCENENT MATAS _' N.ANUfA.TURED BY GEO-GYNTNETICS.INC -- INSTALL 2'THICK GRASS SOP iLANIOK TRM 435 OR A.-PROVED E-UAL) - OVER S01,RASE EXISTING SLI&GMA E - i'DEEa AMENDED SOIL ;SEE NOTE*, �2'MDl COMPACTED SATISFACTORY MATERIAL SUBBASE (MA)LIMLIM SLOPE SIIALL NOT EXCEED 5%) NOTE: AMENDED SOIL COMPOSITION(CLEAN ANO WEED SEED,FREE; SD%SAND 2C-MA TOPSOIL WIrN 35%CLAY CONTENT 20-W%LEAF COMPOST VEGETATED SWALE SCALE:N.T.S. D ,A .T..:L E T E + I , L I I 1 T i L F 1 TI 'n, FL EIORETENTION FILTER SCALE: N.T.S. The plantings and grasses within these areas are identified (SP-4.0) as follows: 3 Page 1 ORNAMENTAL GRASSES a PERENNIALS 4,250 DESCHAMPSIA CESPITOSA 1 TUFTED HAIR GRASS HOSTA SPP.I PLANTAIN LILY PANICUM VIRGATUM 1 SWITCH GRASS PENNISETUM ALOPECUROIDES(HAMELNJ DWARF FOUNTAI RASS SCHICACHYRIUM SCOPARIUM I LITTLE BLUESTEM GRASS STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AREAS 16,282 Sf " '• NORTHEAST WETLAND HUMMOCK MIX BY SOUTHERN TIER CONSULTING OR APPROVED EQUAL.SEED MIX TO INCLUD GREEN BULRUSH,SOFT RUSH,FOX SEDGE,RICE CUT GRASS,BE DED SEDGE,FRINGED SEDGE,SHALLOW SEDGE,AND HOP SE E. _5. The vegetated areas behind house#'s 79-88 Jasmine Lane appear to be thriving and in good heath . The biorention area behing#89-102 is in poor shape where the grading appears flat or dry where the required minimum 6" ponding depth is not provided for and appears that the lack of moisture and soil structure as depicted in the details was not provided for. The sensitive requirements for the seed mix to grow and thrive is important for the uniformity of growth and establishment of plant life as is clearly visible in all of the other areas of the community. I found that the drainage infrastructure in this bio-retention area is properly functioning in that water is being conveyed in the underground piping; as evidenced by water flowing through the pipe network at the various headwalls. RECOMMENDATIONS: It is recommended that the Landscape Architect of record (Andrew Tung) and contractor responsible for the development of this work be consulted to re-evaluate the present conditions behind the Jasmine Lane homes and make the necessary repairs. These repairs will likely require the bio-retention areas (part of where plant growth is not prevelant) to be re-graded and constructed as provided for in the landscape plans and details. Prior to any work taking place a plan should be obtained in advance to insure that the new work will be acceptable. OF NEIV ro -END OF REPORT- SA4~ �ti%9� * o toot$ 41Page H&H 411 Theodore Fremd Avenue Suite 206 South Rye,NY 10580 T:914.967.6S40 www.hardestyhanover.com MEMORANDUM IECEME DO To: Robert I. Goodman, Chairman, and the MAY - 2 2025 Planning Board of the Village of Rye Brook VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK Date: May 1, 2025 BUILDING DEPARTMENT Subject: Kingfield Lot Owners Association, Inc.—Application for Approval of an Amended PUD Site Plan As requested, we have reviewed application, correspondence and plans submitted by the Applicant for approval of an amended PUD site plan involving installation of additional impervious surfaces (patio expansions) on the property located at 2 Rose Lane, SBL 129.25-1-1 on the Town of Rye Tax Map in the Planned Unit Development ("PUD") District. Review We have reviewed application materials and plans that include the following items- 1. Application for Amened Site Plan Approval; 2. Short Environmental Assessment Form and Mapper; 3. A letter from Steven F. Fews, Building Inspector, dated 4/15/25; 4. A letter from David B. Gelfarb, Esq., Kingfield HOA, dated 4/14/25; 5. A letter from Langan Engineering dated 3/28/25; 6. The following set of plans generally entitled, "Site Plan Amendment" prepared by Langan Engineering, Environmental, Surveying, Landscape Architecture and Geology, DPC last revised 3/28/25: a. Sheet CS-100, "Site Plan Amendment; b. Sheet CS-101, "Site Plan Amendment: Enlargement (1 of 2); c. Sheet CS-102, "Site Plan Amendment: Enlargement (2 of 2). Please note that our review is limited to planning and environmental issues. We offer the following comments regarding the application: 1. Site Plan. H&H a. The amended PUD Site Plan approval resolution adopted by the Board of Trustees on February 15, 2018 notes that no more than 4,835 square feet of additional impervious surface coverage may be added to the common area without modifications to the stormwater management facilities. The Applicant is proposing to use the available 4,835 square feet of additional impervious surface allowed to be used for the legalization of patios, walkways and other impervious surfaces installed by residents to their homes. The plans note that a total of 3613.47 square feet of impervious surfaces have been added to the Site Plan.The"Expanded Patio Calculations"table should add a line to show the total of the "Net Additional Expanded Patio Area" column. b. The original approval resolution noted that the Applicant shall cooperate with the Village in developing guidelines for future renovations, home expansions or additions to ensure that no more than 4,835 square feet of additional impervious surface coverage is added to the site without further review and possible modification of the stormwater management system. We recommend that the Applicant provide the Board with draft guidelines referenced by the Resolution. It is our opinion that additional homeowners will eventually request modifications to their homes such as expansion of the home, addition of a shed, back-up generator or a patio, or expansion of an existing driveway, patio or walkway. The guidelines can map out how the process will be handled. We look forward to our discussion with the Board. Sarah L. Brown, AICP Associate, Principal Planner cc: Honorable Mayor and the Village Board of Trustees Christopher Bradbury, Village Administrator Michal Nowak, Superintendent of Public Works/Village Engineer Robert Zitt, Esq., Planning Board Attorney STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK PLANNING I30ARD ------------------------------------------------------------- -X In the Matter of the Application of Kingfield Planning Board Meeting Date: Lot Owners Association, Inc. to Amend Approved May 8, 2025 at 6:30 P.M. Site Plan, ----------------------------------------------------------------X STATE OF NEW YORK ) ) ss. COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER ) ERIC STEILMAN,being duly sworn,deposes and says: 1. I am over the age of 18 years. I reside in Westchester County,New York. I have personal knowledge of the facts and circumstances set forth herein. I submit this affidavit in connection with the application of the Kingfield Lot Owners Association, Inc. ("Kingfield")to amend its site plan. 2. On April 23, 2025 I placed a public notice sign on the referenced property adjacent to the Kingfield clubhouse at 1 Rose Lane, in the Village of Rye Brook. 3. 1 have posted public notice signs on numerous occasions in the Village of Rye Brook and am familiar with the requirements of the Village Code with respect to public notice signs. 4. The sign was intended to comply with the notification requirements of Village Code Section 250-40(A). The sign was posted more than seven days prior to the initial meeting by the Planning Board on the captioned matter, in compliance with Code Section 250-40(A)(1)(b). The sign complied with the format requirements of Village Code Section 250-40(A)(2). /16--gERC MAN�� Sworn to before me this of May,2025. NohrY Pubk Me of Na Of ANdb03W YOM ...i*SIN;+,,,-�„,as�•t�� BUILDING DEPARTMENT VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK 938 KING STREET RYE BROOK, NY 10573 (914)939-0668 Phone (914)939-5801 Fax stews@ryebrookny.sov Memorandum To: Chairman Robert Goodman & Members of Village Planning Board From: Steven E. Fews, Building & Fire Inspector CC: Sarah H. Brown, Village Planning Consultant Date: April 15, 2025 Re: Kingfield Development P.U.D @ 1100 King St- Site Plan Amendment. Please see the attached application for an amendment and modification to the original approved Site Plan. Be advised, that it was discovered by complaint, then site inspection that numerous houses have taken it upon themselves to do new patios, extensions of existing patios and/or outdoor improvements that have increased the impervious coverage limitations. These works of construction were mainly done without permit and were found to violate the final resolution for the development. The H.O.A. applicant now proposes to take on the necessary steps to have the full site plan amended. If they can obtain approval of their proposal, the individual property owners and or H.O.A. will be able to legalize their desired improvements. As of this date, approximately 12 notices of violation and/or Stop Work Orders were issued. Further notices of violation and/or court summonses tickets are pending, as we wait the outcome of the hearing(s) at the Planning Board. Thank You: Steve Fews BI � MOSS & KALISH , Pt. c APR 15 2�.5 V COUNSELLORS AT LAW 1 2 2 EAST 42 N D STREET BUD yDING DE BROOK MARK L. KALISH NEW YORK, NY 10168-0098 DAVID B.GELFARB' --- 500 OLD COUNTY,SUITE 2 GARDEN CITY,NY 11530 IAMESSCHWARTZMAN TELEPHONE: (212) 867-4488 --- TELECOPIER: (212) 983-5276 writer's e-mail: <,,,..oe'T'E[,114�+E�JFRSF, E-MAIL: LAWYERS @ M O S S K A L I S H.C O M gelfarb@mosskalish.com April 14, 2025 Honorable Chairman Robert Goodman and Members of the Village Planning Board Village of Rye Brook 938 King Street Rye Brook,New York 10573 Re: Kingfield Lot Owners Association, Inc. Application for Site Plan Amendment 2 Rose Lane, Rye Brook,NY 10573 Parcel ID No. 129.25-1-1 Dear Honorable Chairman Goodman and Members of the Planning Board: We are the attorneys for the Kingfield Lot Owners Association, Inc. ("Association"). I write in support of the Association's application to amend the PUD site plan approved by the Board of Trustees on February 23, 2016, as amended on January 10, 2017 pursuant to resolution of the Board of Trustees, as further amended October 30,2017 pursuant to resolution of the Board of Trustees (the "2017 Resolution"), and as further amended on February 13, 2018 pursuant to resolution of the Board of Trustees(following a Report and Recommendation by this Board dated February 8, 2018) (the"2018 Resolution").' As is set forth herein, and pursuant to meetings and discussions with Village Superintendent of Public Works and Engineering Michal Nowak, and Village Building and Fire Inspector Steven Fews, the Association requests that the Village authorize a"swap" or"trade" of 4,835 square feet of(unused)impervious surface coverage from the common area of the Kingfield residential development ("Kingfield" or the "Development") to the homeowners for use in connection with their patios, decks, walkways or other impervious surface. By way of background, the need for a site plan amendment has arisen due to numerous patios at Kingfield, and thus homes, not being in compliance with Section 4(b) of the 2018 Resolution. Section 4(b)provides that: A copy of the 2018 Resolution is annexed hereto as Exhibit"A." Honorable Chairman Robert Goodman April 14,2025 Page 2 No expansions or additions, decks, walkways or other additional impervious surface coverage shall be permitted on the 110 individual residential lot other than what is shown on the Amended PUD Site Plan approved by Resolution of the Board of Trustees on October 30, 2017. As is set forth in the enclosed report from the Association's consulting engineer, Langan Engineering, Environmental, Surveying, Landscape Architecture and Geology, D.P.C. ("Langan"), and as is further documented in Langan's engineering drawings, there are 35 homes in Kingfield that have expanded their patios, and thus their respective allowable impervious coverage,beyond what is authorized by the 2017 Resolution. Section 4(a)of the 2018 Resolution provides as follows: No more than 4,835 square feet of additional impervious surface overage may be added to the common area shown on this subdivision plat beyond what is shown on the Amended PUD Site Plan,approved by Resolution of the Village Board of Trustees on October 30,2017,without further review by the Village of Rye Brook. As is set forth in Langan's report and drawings,the total expanded impervious area represented by the expanded patios of the 35 homes is 3,613.47 square feet. This is less than the 4,835 square feet of additional impervious coverage in the Development's common area that is authorized by the 2017 Resolution. The amount of expansion beyond what was permitted in the Amended PUD Site Plan approved in the 2017 Resolution ranges from 10.54 feet to 450.42 square feet. The average is 103.24 square feet per home (3,613.47/35 homes). The median expansion is 92.20 square feet (i.e. seventeen homes have greater than 92.20 square feet of additional impervious surface and half have less than 92.20 square feet of additional impervious surface). Accordingly, the Association requests that the 2018 Resolution be amended to authorize expansions or additions of decks, walkways or other impervious surface coverage with respect to the 110 individual residential lots of no more than 4,835 feet beyond what is shown on the Amended PUD Site Plan approved pursuant to the 2017 Resolution. In other words, the Association seeks to assign or swap the unused 4,835 square feet that is allocated to common areas for use by individual homeowners. The Association recognizes that if this application is granted,homeowners who have expanded their patios beyond what is permitted in the 2017 Resolution will still need to "legalize" the expansion. Accordingly, such homeowners will have to pay application fees, submit plans,obtain building permits,etc.They will also have to resolve outstanding violations. Similarly,homeowners who, in the future, wish to expand their patios, decks or other impervious surface coverage will have to do so in the ordinary course and submit applications,pay required fees, etc. Parenthetically, we note that the Association raised the issue with Mr. Nowak of whether homes that had a de minimus amount of impervious patio area in excess of what was otherwise Honorable Chairman Robert Goodman April 14, 2025 Page 3 permitted might be found to not be in violation of the 2018 Resolution or Village Code section 209-1(D)on the ground that such minimal expansion constituted"minor field changes"or"minor modifications"under Code section 209-1(D). For purposes of that discussion,it was assumed that an amount less than 30 square feet constituted a de minimus amount of out of compliance impervious area. According to Langan's analysis, there are seven such homes. In any event, we understand that counsel determined that these homes were in fact out of compliance with the 2018 Resolution and that no de minimus exception was applicable. The Association submits the following documents in support of this application: a. Amended Site Plan Application; b. Short Environmental Assessment Form, Parts 1 with EAF Mapper Summary Report; c. Langan letter dated March 28, 2025 (with Appendices A through C); d. Langan Drawing CS-100 (Site Plan Amendment); e. Langan Drawing CS-101 (Site Plan Amendment: Enlargement [1 of 2]; and f. Langan Drawing CS-102 (Site Plan Amendment: Enlargement [2 of 2]. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. We look forward to discussing this matter with the Planning Board at its May 8, 2025 meeting. Respectfully submitted, David B. Gelfarb cc: Jennifer Gray. Esq. EXHIBIT A On a motion made by Trustee Rednick and seconded by Trustee Epstein,the following r as adopted. RESOLUTION V1 COPY CONSIDERING AN APPLICATION FOR AMENDED PUD SUBDIVISION APPROVAL FOR SC RYE BROOK PARTNERS,LLC(SUN HOMESIEINGFIELD) LOCATED AT 1100 KING STREET WHEREAS,SC Rye Brook Partners LLC(Sun Homes/Kingfield),property owner,submitted an Application in connection with proposed amendments to the PUD Subdivision approved by the Board of Trustees on January 10, 2017 in connection with a residential development of 110 single- family dwelling units and one common lot with certain amenities including a Clubhouse("Project')on property located at 1 100 King Street,designated as Section 129.25,Block 1,Lot 1 on the Town of Rye Tax Map and located in the Planned Unit Development("PUD")District;and WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees is the Approval Authority for this application and will serve in its continuing role as Lead Agency pursuant to the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act(SEQRA);and WHEREAS,on July 28,2015 the Board of Trustees adopted a Negative Declaration pursuant to SEQRA for the Proposed Action which included certain text amendments to the PUD zoning regulations in Chapter 250 of the Village Code, rezoning the Property from OB-1 to PUD, PUD Concept Plan and PUD Site Plan approvals,and other required permits and approvals,and WHEREAS, on August 18, 2015 the Board of Trustees rezoned the Property from OB-1 to PUD and approved a PUD Concept Plan for the construction of 110 dwelling units at the Property, 10 of which are Fair and Affordable Housing Units;and WHEREAS,on February 23,2016 the Board of Trustees granted approval of a PUD Site Plan; and WHEREAS, on March 10, 2016, the Village of Rye Brook Planning Board granted a Steep Slopes Permit in connection with the Project;and WHEREAS, on January 10, 2017, the Board of Trustees granted Preliminary and Final Subdivision Plat Approval for the Project;and WHEREAS,on March 9,2017,the Village of Rye Brook Planning Board approved a two year extension of the Steep Slopes Permit;and WHEREAS, on June 27, 2017, the Board of Trustees granted two consecutive 90-day extensions of the Subdivision Approval referenced herein from July 9,2017 to and including January 5, 2018, and on December 18,2017 the Board of Trustees granted a third extension 90-day extension from January 5,2018 to and including April 5,2018;and WHEREAS, on October 30, 2017 the Board of Trustees granted Amended PUD Site Plan approval to address modifications to the plan necessitated by the location of the existing eight(8)inch water main on the Property(which services Belle Fair)farther west than anticipated;and WHEREAS, other changes to shown on the approved Amended PUD Site Plan include (1) clubhouse terrace was modified to provide ADA access to the spa area and to add an outdoor shower and a stone poll utility area was provided,(2)the parking spaces around the Clubhouse were modified in orientation and location,(3)changes were made to market rate unit types in response to comments from the Architectural Review Board regarding excessive similarity, (4)the unit mix along Roadway C was modified,but in a mariner consistent with the prior PUD Site Plan approval,(5)Roadway E was modified from a dead-end road to a shared driveway, (6) the amount of retaining walls has been reduced due to changes in the grading plan which results in an overall decrease in the amount of Steep Slopes disturbance,(7)the number of walkout basements is decreased from forty-nine(49)to nineteen (19),and(8)the number of common parking spaces increased from 58 to 61 spaces;and WHEREAS, consistent with the Amended PUD Site Plan, the Applicant submitted an application to the Board of Trustees for an Amended PUD Subdivision;and i WHEREAS,the Board of Trustees reviewed the following plans and application materials: 1. Short Environmental Assessment Form Part 1 and EAF Mapper Summary Report dated December 7,2017 2. Application for Subdivision of Land dated December 7,2017 3. Letter to the Mayor and Board of Trustees from Cuddy and Feder, LLP,White Plains,N.Y.dated December 7,2017 4. Comment Letter to the Village's Planning Consultant from the Westchester County Planning Board dated January 19,2018 5. "Subdivision Map of Kingfield,"prepared by Link Land Surveyors, P.C., Mahopac, N.Y., dated December 6,2017;and WHEREAS, on January 9, 2018, the Board of Trustees referred the Amended Site Plan application to the Planning Board for report and recommendation pursuant to Section 250- 7.E(4)(b)(3)(a)of the Village Code;and WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees is in receipt of the Planning Board's report and recommendation dated February 8,2018;and WHEREAS, the Amended PUD Subdivision application was referred to the Westchester County Planning Board, pursuant to General Municipal Law §239-m and the Board of Trustees is in receipt of comments from the County dated January 19,2018;and WHEREAS, the proposed action is an Unlisted Action, pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act(SEQRA);and WHEREAS, on February 13, 2018, the Board of Trustees opened a public hearing on the subject application,at which time all persons interested were given an opportunity to speak on behalf of or in opposition to said application and the Board of Trustees closed the public hearing on February 13,2018;and WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees has reviewed memoranda from Village Planning Consultant Frederick P.Clark Associates,Inc.dated February 5,2018;and WHEREAS,the Village Planning Consultant, Village Staff and the Planning Board reviewed the information and submitted comments regarding the Application;and WHEREAS,the Board of Trustees is fully familiar with the subject property and has reviewed and considered the Planning Board's report and recommendation, all submittals by the Applicant, all memoranda issued by Village staff and consultants, and all comments from the public and governmental agencies. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Trustees continues its role as Lead Agency pursuant to SEQRA and determines that the Project will not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts based up on the information stated in the EAF and supplemental information and hereby adopts the annexed Negative Declaration. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED,that for the reasons stated herein, the Village of Rye Brook Board of Trustees hereby approves the Amended PUD Subdivision application referenced herein, subject to the following conditions: 1. Satisfaction of any outstanding conditions of the Resolutions adopted by the Board of Trustees on July 28, 2015, August 15, 2015, February 23, 2016 and January 10, 2017 concerning the Sun Homes project. 2. The Applicant shall prepare a Final Subdivision Plat in accordance with Section 219-32 of the Village of Rye Brook Subdivision Regulations, which shall include the Town of Rye tax lot designations for the subject lots. Upon obtaining a satisfactory review by the Village Engineer/Superintendent of Public Works, the Final Subdivision Plat shall be submitted for review and signature to the Westchester County Department of Health. The signature of the Department of Health shall be required prior to the signing of the Final Plat by the Mayor. 3. Based on prior reviews by the Village's Consulting Engineer,Dolph Rotfeld Engineering,P.C. for the original PUD Site Plan and Subdivision approvals, the applicable stormwater management facilities were sized to allow an additional 11,000 square feet of impervious surface coverage on the Property before modifications to the stormwater management facilities would be necessary. According to the Applicant,the Amended PUD Site Plan approved by the Board of Trustees on October 30, 2017, adds approximately 6,165 square feet of impervious surface coverage to the Property. As a condition of that approval,the Applicant is required to provide written verification of its calculations to confirm that 4,835 square feet of impervious surface coverage remains available. Prior to the signing of the Final Plat by the Mayor, the Applicant shall provide written verification of its calculations to confirm that 4,835 square feet of impervious surface coverage remains available. 4. Prior to the signing of the Final Plat by the Mayor,the notes on the Plat shall be revised to state as follows: a. No more than 4,835 square feet of additional impervious surface coverage may be added to the common area shown on this subdivision plat beyond what is shown on the Amended PUD Site Plan, approved by Resolution of the Village Board of Trustees on October 30,2017,without further review by the Village of Rye Brook. b. No expansions or additions, decks, walkways or other additional impervious surface coverage shall be permitted on the 110 individual residential lots other than what is shown on the Amended PUD Site Plan approved by Resolution of the Board of Trustees on October 30,2017. 5. The Applicant shall submit a statement signed by the Town of Rye Receiver of Taxes that all taxes due by the Applicant have been paid. 6. The Final Plat shall be filed in the Westchester County Clerk's Office in accordance with the provisions of New York State Village Law and Chapter 219 of the Village of Rye Brook Code. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that for the ten (10) traits of affordable housing, the applicant shall work with the village's affordable housing consultant(i.e.the Housing Action Council) to comply with the requirements of the Westchester County federal housing settlement for the purpose of having these units qualify towards satisfying the affordable housing mandates in the settlement. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED,that no permits shall be issued until the Applicant has paid to the Village all applicable fees and professional review fees incurred in connection with review of this Application. TRUSTEE EPSTEIN AYE TRUSTEE HEISER AYE TRUSTEE KLEIN AYE TRUSTEE REDNICK AYE MAYOR ROSENBERG AYE State of New York County of Westchester ss: Village of Rye Brook I hereby certify that this is the Resolution adopted by the Board of Trustees of the Village of Rye Brook which was duly passed by said Board on February 13,2013 IN WITNESS WHEREOF,1 have hereunto set my hand and affixed the Seal of the Village of Rye Brook,this 15"' day of February,2018 Villa e Cler LAI%IGA/V March 28, 2025 Honorable Chair Robert Goodman Village of Rye Brook Planning Board 938 King Street Rye Brook, NY 10573 Re: Site Visit Memo Kingfield — 1100 King Street Village of Rye Brook, New York Langan Project No.: 190115801 Dear Mr. Goodman and Members of the Planning Board: Technical Excellence Practical Experience Client Responsiveness On behalf of the applicant, Kingfield Lot Owners Association, Inc., we are requesting a site plan amendment to the previously approved Site Plan for the Kingfield Development. The project site is 110 lot residential subdivision, designed by Divney Tung and Schwalbe, located in the Village of Rye Brook. We understand the enacted resolution of approval, dated February 13, 2018, stated that "No expansions or additions, decks, walkways or other additional impervious surface coverage shall be permitted on the 110 individual residential lots other than what is shown on the Amended PUD Site Plan approved by Resolution of the Board of Trustees on October 30, 2017." Based on a field visit and a detailed desktop investigation, it is concluded that there are 35 units that had independently made modifications to their existing patio area by expanding them. These expansions have resulted in the addition of impervious coverage on the site. We understand that expanded impervious areas are any impervious areas in a housing unit's backyard outside the covering of a balcony or canopy, extending from the building, deck, and/or patio, and not indicated on the most recent architectural plans as approved by the Village. We understand that the Village will allow the homeowners to "trade" or "swap" impervious area up to 4,835 square feet that was previously allocated to the common area. This would result in a smaller allowance for previously approved impervious coverage common area to be built out in the future. The total expanded impervious area for the site was calculated to be 3,613 square feet. This area is 1,222 square feet less than the Village's "trade" or "swap" allowance of 4,835 square feet. On behalf of the applicant, we are requesting the Planning Board approve the application to amend the site plan. This letter outlines the observations from the October 4, 2024, site visit performed by Langan Engineering, Environmental, Surveying, Landscape Architecture and Geology, D.P.C. (Langan) at the Kingfield property in Rye Brook, New York. As part of our evaluation, we also reviewed the Kingfield architectural plans, obtained from the Village of Rye Brook docsRB database, to correlate the site improvements against as -built conditions. One North Broadway, Suite 910 White Plains, NY 10601 T. 914.323.7400 F: 914.323.7401 www.langan.com New Jersey • New York -Connecticut • Massachusetts • Pennsylvania • Washington, DC • Ohio • Illinois • Florida • Texas • Arizona • Colorado • Washington • California Athens • Calgary 9 Dubai • London • Panama Site Visit Memo Kingfield - 1100 King Street Village of Rye Brook, New York Langan Project No.: 190115BOl METHODS — ALLOWABLE AREA March 28, 2025 Page 2of6 Langan retrieved architectural plans for the Kingfield property from the Village of Rye Brook docsRB database. Langan used the Architectural Site Plan, drawing BXX-0 dated November 18`h, 2020, from the Kingfield Development Cluster XX Permit Set of Drawings, to determine each housing structure's unit type (e.g. "A", "BR", "C2 W/O") (See Appendix B). A set of architectural plans was retrieved from docsRB for one housing unit of each unit type and used as the standard for that unit type (See Appendix Q. The backyard impervious area permitted for each unit type, located outside of the column lines, was calculated from the architectural plans' floor plans. Housing units were assigned permitted backyard impervious areas, located outside of the structure column line, based on their unit type. The "allowable" patio areas per unit type are as shown below: Unit Type "Allowable" Patio Area (SF) As Shown Outside of Column Line A— "A" Unit 97.18 A— "A" Unit Walkout 2.76 BR — "B right" Unit 92.08 BR — "Bright" Unit Walkout 2.71 BL— "B Left" Unit 92.08 BL — "B Left" Unit Walkout 2.71 C1 — "C" Unit, Master Up 95.47 C1 — "C" Unit, Master Up Walkout 10.00 C2 — "C" Unit, Master Down 176.25 C2 — "C" Unit, Master Down Walkout 5.00 DR — "D Right" Unit 259 DR — "D Right" Unit Walkout 6.17 DL— "D Left" Unit 283.67 DL — "D Left" Unit Walkout 6.17 LANGAN Site Visit Memo March 28, 2025 Kingfield - 1100 King Street Page 3 of 6 Village of Rye Brook, New York Langan Project No.: 190115801 Unit Type "Allowable" Patio Area (SF) As Shown Outside of Column Line YR — "Y Right" Unit 81.38 YL— "Y Left" Unit 81.38 ZR — "Z Right" Unit 81.38 ZL— "Z Left" Unit 81.38 METHODS — AS -BUILT AREA Langan conducted a site visit, at the Kingfield property on October 41h, 2024. Langan examined the backyard of each housing unit. Any impervious areas in a housing unit's backyard extending from the building, deck, and/or patio and outside the covering of a balcony or canopy were documented, photographed, and measured using a measuring wheel and/or measuring tape. The as -built area of each housing unit's backyard impervious area, located outside the column limits, as measured during Langan's October 4th site visit was compared to the proposed patio impervious area, as shown on the architectural design drawings and as listed in the table above. Any expansions from the allowable area were documented, and the sum of all expanded areas was calculated. Refer to Appendix A for a Key Map. The table below sets forth the housing units that were identified as being over the allowable patio square footage and by how much additional square footage the units exceeded the permitted limit: House Number Street Name Additional Impervious Area (Sq. Ft.) 1 Honeysuckle Lane 175.75 3 Honeysuckle Lane 68.83 5 Honeysuckle Lane 450.42 7 Honeysuckle Lane 25.38 9 Honeysuckle Lane 105.64 6 Jasmine Lane 27.39 10 Jasmine Lane 193.79 3 Mulberry Court 143.54 4 Mulberry Court 46.67 5 Mulberry Court 70.85 3 Rose Lane 13.78 8 Rose Lane 26.92 1 Lavender Lane 164.75 2 Lavender Lane 101.49 3 Lavender Lane 31.99 4 Lavender Lane 10.96 LANGAN Site Visit Memo March 28, 2025 Kingfield - 1100 King Street Page 4 of 6 Village of Rye Brook, New York Langan Project No.: 190115801 5 Lavender Lane 82.28 6 Lavender Lane 142.40 9 Lavender Lane 161.20 11 Lavender Lane 41.21 13 Lavender Lane 92.20 17 Lavender Lane 106.01 18 Lavender Lane 99.32 19 Lavender Lane 131.53 21 Lavender Lane 114.17 27 Lavender Lane 109.86 1 Primrose Lane 203.40 3 Primrose Lane 65.78 4 Primrose Lane 79.60 6 Primrose Lane 164.76 10 Primrose Lane 69.49 11 Primrose Lane 54.36 12 Primrose Lane 200.08 9 Gardenia Lane 27.13 13 Gardenia Lane 10.54 LANGAN Site Visit Memo March 28, 2025 Kingfield - 1100 King Street Page 5 of 6 Village of Rye Brook, New York Langan Project No.: 190115801 CONCLUSIONS The total expanded impervious area for the site was calculated to be 3,613 sq. ft. This area is less than the Village's "trade" or "swap" allowance of 4,835 sq. ft. On behalf of the applicant, we are requesting the Planning Board approve the application to amend the site plan. Please feel free to contact the undersigned with any questions or comments at (914) 323-7422 or via email at Imcmahon@langan.com. Figure 1: Example Compliant Impervious Area (20 Jasmine Lane — BR Walkout) Figure 2: Example Expanded Impervious Area (3 Honeysuckle Lane — BR Walkout) LANGAN Site Visit Memo March 28, 2025 Kingfield - 1100 King Street Page 6 of 6 Village of Rye Brook, New York Langan Project No.: 190115801 Sincerely, Langan Engineering, Environmental, Surveying, Landscape Architecture and Geology, D.P.C. V%4 Lauren McMahon, PE Project Manager Michael Finan, PE LEED AP PrincipalNice President Enclosure(s): Appendix A — Expanded Patio Key Map Appendix B —Architectural Site Plan Appendix C — Unit Type Plans Uangan.com\data\WPW\daUMl90l l5801Trojea Data\_Disciphe\Site CMKReportsVO250327 Site VisR Memo.do LANGAN Appendix A: Expanded Patio Key Map LANGAN MARKUP NOTE: asterisk (*) and street address in I/ red font denote an expanded patio observed / _ _ *a17 V * 8 1, 13 «• 7 m I I I I I 1 1 r, 21 \ - 7 V4 \ ! \ z \ 3 6 i A. KINGFIELD — loll IIWKIN EIR67 RYE BROOK, NY .,,ERN,. I,vvlMur+llw u, LkMN FR. CIVIL Al "R.LiMYAH ARCHRER DNNN • TLnc • SC ALRE SURv w R�Lwvr LWM(bI olo A. ® �1 SITE LAYOUT PLAN �= SP-1.1 Appendix B: Architectural Site Plan LANGAN � 0.1 31117 I2,13 I N 53 - - Fll y]]b] O I G Mb.0 NO I O 5] CI - M.I] FLI WIA A 2O RI 39a6J G ]J G aro O I SJ 56 CI C2 35 Ne6E: X, ME' OFFrzE 1 Fu w/o /.qJ 193 I C2 O O t'MES PYMINa• A5. et 59 CI I A 14E5 PYdINO 6] O C2 DR I 13 RS-SnESPARONG. dOi gR „ xe. Do XOT ENTER BR ' ----- x]�W XOi EX]ER DL J _. CLVs 9 E _ RPI.' A E L N YL Oaa NONErsucpL 1v I av JCL „ZR 31 CWS C FIT] 17 wwlpb. ':I 15 BLSE..93 bC4etlal dl D C Is L 31 F 31) F ` Im0 IS 33 _ FLIT 467 79 GASJJ C Vp IFLO ] .•1 n oll, pI n 0 O w BL F .) - •9p IJ 33E 93 FLI AJ.6] gR C2O - ZL p 1'I .I] wro OLTHE 9) ; V .9 0.1 AN 67 O C e 42 ]5 A433 I A ]65.93 ' O C2O " YLO 1 R IrA.. DR 1a * > O 1 li9s.m I]C6.91 Ala /+l GW59z 3059] 45 D 1.1 3 R{6 D.1] e3 G T3.9 a• -O i S 33 AO A. dt O TN5_ l.L R'wzro4] DR 11 16 C` ' G39493 11 ® P u ...1 35 3 F 1 b9.1) 308.41 m O a ] 2 YRO G a.97 C " F1SA5.1] HIGH, . bnpX:a Np.. RI O C1 6$ GSN..) InwmalonOl GlNellee Q 19 N593 s A I,omcn&tl RW,R,H✓ RIrvro1J BL BL O Joan) 5 sn "L eJ 1]05.6T .A IJ C I nul.: n 304ll ]9 I O NO PA551NG F ObF l6'� N4 0.39J.0 a p� RpIX maF e.ln?o. RIW9J:6] al DR y '] 10 RJ0650 W.IR C2 OC2 o G 99691 FLI A6.IJ a Jl.OHHG6R,wl G FLISW` ...1]' 8BL 10 cC C F711 3) BL a 9 'P G 3 _ ® F' M) O G .9q 13 e'1 b 6 p% 39e4 W IF YR.50 G30]..3 93 DR a 11 O C1 (f90 1 .8 .1] C2 FIT 29].1] s 130337 GPO.3 9s ..41 J01. A • 055n CI GM..] i 4 q A 1958J FIT YR.I � C2 1 tl9n •) IRV mmI. ], 1] cJaou fN 96 34 Gfe [ CIO 111 G]00. 11 5' �� 07 v O FIT 297 M. .non 1. wro T OC1 16 G AS.aI 1 BL 3 C2 GE,, A 31 1 \ 101 GD]1. 5 O G A5d3 f A 2E]33 C2 I. C J R13U.1) (}� ® G N24 O 11 C1 y G]O1. CI ,AG tlN r6bw ° O la v9..3 \ ® G3fll9 A F 3IB' G 96J 4naIA`I a"c. 9 • AO aX'X C' 6 R11. 9J C2 a 9. )a IALI) G301y G 1C8 �A 9'�e lu cml G 09A C San1066] 10 FL1 e 1O ` RTae a mn 1 Ee s R.NWHOA..n aA C2 Iluclbn A RI AI6] Gw,G M aclrc5a 13 76 at aEo II pole G 91 G b Mtl C, C/ O DL N G191 A BL Ll A3.17 3 $ J ® GAI. R119.N GOJ Y 9 G .R }9R 0 J A 6e A© P" 5 4of CI "1 BR V GG Cl W/, O GM9w1 11 C( C I,N 03) f 1 ® G AJ CI \ 1 DR 15 i0 A a R� Fn C2 C( l GE" ® M17 n V CWSI RCD FLI AI.e] ]] G AND Gn]91 wro BR 1 GM93 G 1 ]I DL BR W93. O O G 91 916] FLI W/G W/G GA}91 GA191 NOTE: FOR OI1aRFER TO C MIMPOSES VIL DNGLY.RAWI REFER TO L RE SITE WORK FIXt 4L RELATED SITE WORA. A- F'n�'MIT aR-'a NIGHT' MIT M..'R LEFT' WIT CI- 'C' MIT. MASTER LP C3- T' WIT. MASTER DOWN DR-9 NIGHT" MIT ON LEFT 'W VW RIGHT" MIT LEFT'WT ER--E RIGHT' MIT EL 'Z LEI Wli D MHOLT C Y N GJW.,1 X E o x } LI SII b] O 3 11 A xD V/ w j Z C1 'J U 0 O N '_O O �. Q) m IJ CI R13H.1 U d/ v.0 u A V C 116 9 Ww AM I) 9M of ] C2 HI )99.1 9 0 CDa 199. CI , > J & lA'1 `x�/ A' % DR C2 1 D Appendix C: Unit Type Plans LANGAN 16.54 FT :MT FINISHED 9ASEMEM SEE rox-vcAu�our DASFTn+r R0.•'rt RAN Fpl IIlWIATIOII M 1X9 AFW� `$g NONWiLKWf dv�rFwon RX1 FQl INPOFl4NTION IN 1 5 A7 i BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN w/ WALKOUT suu vc=r-a• UNIT TYPE "A WALKOUT' ALLOWABLE PATIO AREA 1 B4Q1E11T FMISIi ROtlI „)SO.FT. 991 SG.R. � rco: 1425 SG.Fi. LOTY.. JRW SO.fT. 40P�4E 41V SO.Fi. (b i O n Apmommomi ?I 0 Y a' 0' £ N4Y'O Y O r 3 m z Y O O Q W 7 CV 01 O N U m Lo O m)1 rmP) t DINING ROOM Ha 1rtp 1 KITCHEN D o D os w s' @F b- 9 S` PAN}RY LAV +e- 16.54 FT "J E LOHP051TE 9 . PJc � pECKl145 ENAQGpAIL Ib' ' W D. DECK OR BLUESTONE PAVER I]^ �Lleel CL " LS w Nµys a at GEMILIHS TO XPVE Y.• TYPE'%' 6vP EpARp� GARAGE r------------------- I I I t YNn3! Her13e cLzrxT w I rune snalPP® I OOdt a wure3l- LIVING ROOM 6A5 FOYER CL f [1 FIRST FLOOR PLAN `�Y 5[CLF I/4'a 1'-4' UNIT TYPE "All ALLOWABLE PATIO AREA 5.88 FT 1- L E MR c Mr wcoP Iesa+ E b-I ' r- 1 •-IW e•-L3•• I SML W J!!L d1 1W' W SeCG dl i q • CSwT ?� CSwT ._ ° 1 I n I roEiED �, w c ______ ____ _ _ ________ .a• YlilC OF b' r1ALL eELON BATH pwwlSs wllbwe.✓ NLE ` a MITI" cevlce3 THHAT i aHEGNAI4AYE Q I 4 µ' VY11tt 13. � N1pV 3 IT POR ETEwBEN4Y I f mx rt ) i b s MASTER z» Inr wau BEDROOM I WALK-IN °e CL 0A amw+AL z SKTLIMT i uaD a SH3F ° 4. ° I $IIELYIH4 IbDl11 RieHIM6 - I 1 _ MCIE i fMY PLVE 5wK � X I DEN 4 i LAUNDRY y' I i t l i ab raYLL. ♦a od I a sv_V Se' wmw I Iroiw+u ce 2.4 o LINEN g HALL STAIR I � erwm ns, ._ w n N w 36' NOW < "s4 BATH ti 6 FMMwALL I ervarYlrr slirLlaHr _ I i n iR0p° � emlaF I n I WALK-IN ze wT wau yo. _ WALK — I i CL .6 . AA CL i i i da i3'A• 3'-I 1'- 1'- ' b'-1' 3'AVj' I I I I � e _ BEDROOM #2 BEDROOM #J ule a• � I eawEss wrww w &SAos wlmoVe w L�MTINb pEVILC4 LIHIn pNILES r T wAVE RELEIY THAT MA'IE1161A'.C__ MPL"AMI^lB TO I.4lA 1" TO p1M6ENLY FY./.PE B4wB[)1CY MADE Y.IM ]ea W liec W bµ "LIW 9BpY l 3'i' Tmi'O' TO TQ' 3'-0• I b' V f n SECOND FLOOR PLAN S. uv..ro f CD f 6s. IL I i ; Mi wOOf G6GM At1M. X' 6URF1t i Ij I. I ____________ y. F DS I I � i I I I i i ! LI I IPpI Sw+°rtL1ONa`awT '- I i N9701EN! —.�' I j j 1• I I I � jJX�; � I I oPTI411K _ m`Yll°wT I i i i T T I i I I j I I I I I A I I I I I I I ------ ---- _---------------- ----- ---------- ------ -___________-__ P L4! Q NALL edwa D. 4 CV Z a °D 2 O N O O Q N z 4 n 3 u u o �L O z r a3i s. Z 3 } Y O < O 'o DO ! Z t 04 C': ON f U E � s f 1 f f a ROOFuPLAN� Lo 3 • R40R YFA'A' Wrt: a Bi$EfEllr. 111 SG.it. fgIRST iL0]R'. WE $4.FT. i4rLL 3.K454.FT. a 4wU4E. U° H4.Fi. 4 i. A. i. L Yaue ze.4zz w.rt. � i c 1/aV'd } 16.25 FT-♦ T , 17 FT -lo•wlc. FwnNss - _<.. sGNGTYCE I _� Ir I-� 1'+' Fwrms o �.F,� F� -4•I F• Was z� &S LMl@SiO.li � u V `� 4"5• I �`-' HXELSS W4L I 1. I W SttTS A F� 3xb T'PJ ____________ _ ___T1-IS9 %� -________________ ______________ f ____________ ��•����[�TOCYI_T__U__t_!__wr_'_T__e_]_t_bw__I'_________ _____TCIYMY.__ _ _ N gl, a+s]w HAu,J---- A,I 9L4[Y_TA,l9— 1 x soFFIT t t = �-zz A. O'D �:a WALK-IN a. P.T ro. NIJLGRS w 16•,c V' �I Cl weccssw XT LtTIL. PND. ! n 1'IALL.!@ G%T CIGVATIPb , a9 PT. YO. N,ILER5116•e.c. 'O ! V gt! LG We INTO - I , NN.L. SEE Erti. ELEVATIONS r2.1 ♦w.0 rw.L FINISH '---- --------- as STIR wAu.. BASEMENT I .p We MTMLS ,Q PBTAILS (° BASEMENT BASEMENT t 6'-5' O '�• j' r3 „ j WALK-IN ti° _ i '✓ AI -- ' CL lol o-I" ,'-o' wl I I i 1• a la: m-,r r >I woe SHELF BIp}HIIIA{�I -' sa• «I6X 1l �_� ; se «�s« ae mr. wmL I, gy.wp/ f.e mt wYL e ; I WAND o NA.ORAL I III I i M.LRA4 I I 1, vi F.____ 1 F____ , o w- - S ,user iu I r-o•l „'•yz ,u.eo•nw m mr. wzu � ae mr. wau I j T7 tW I«i, wYl I LL IM W4L I O N J Trr STAIR I j �u•°°„} STAIR § I O Z fD F a a' O s•<• I I oswe»wN zw an'. wLL G.ecron nv I s oET,+Ess ax xe ,x mIu I 6 , i f.SGTLR PiT/ I _ 1-1� i m SLA[1 MT 1'Gl : I...d � N SLPB FIW F00. J I w ,ii T , I _________________________________________________ ___ ________________________________________________ I I ii i. l r_ - - V ., l OI L UNIX y%AfTEIj UNFINISHED «vnc ; U ATHj UNFIN6HE0 '♦LL j S kR.oE s UTILITY sw � r $ �AR oNi j p UTILITY u 1 srw r.Au I S } AscvE (MJ ^ ; j j�"°f j AecrG ImJ , I LL I I ------ .___ __ _ _ ; -Ni I F---' UNIXCAVATED III ---- n CID o• a 0 5 UNIXCAVAiED Yj c.f w fweof 3j Fj � �•• °P1P°0E �I � N � h DV a cv I I; J SjI n -_- ----- E- --- -'--- __________________________________ ____ Fr_ ___. __ _ ________ I" N --i L___________________________4 ______I7,-ems: _. _-_____________________ ------ ._ ,-la• i I .,t• ,♦ '-law• j j @ I I O BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN w/ WALKOUT BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN I snLe: uc•. r-o- ' 2 suu: Im•. r-o• 9 UNIT TYPE "BL WALKOUT" ALLOWABLE PATIO AREA�- $C],O RKN_ IeM 90.FT, q LOILL. 4.044 SU.Fi. i VOLLME: 55.e00 CU.Fi � L 16.25 FT I'< I'd` i2 3• Iµ .17 FT •,• _� • n• coLLP31 �orcw AGovE� ..,. SONO,L9E iI �OONL. i I,y,• I.y. I I.-y. FOOTINy� w e F rC011116 I +X,4 , 4.4+� � O � • t 0 $ Budd :�=f 4'i'k r o-- <a• K.-D. u ^ z § 4 a t I -- srePs s ° u I __ ]]°TC4rt_ -°E_ �S�,T_____ _TI63T9frT]STC9Tr Kam________ r r - TE'FiEARf ^tFRfPF6_ I I fi ID12w IT'rJ i i _—____________ ____ ____--------- _ ___ - i� J 7 a - ,TLC WALL. 4 '12•Y'1 w Gb ' 4 I J 5EE DETALS } SORIT I t 2 if WALK-IN ]]YV.ISV j S ].<PT YV7 N41L91Aw le`O [. ' CL SfTPIT I iZ 1 wCGE39® IWO GOrY, Elm. I r ?W w.T MO. NAILGRS • bbc. WALL, 9H P R EIEVAngO wAu,lS GXT erewTKwe ! - ; I FINISHED 2.e SPA WALL, °e j FINISHED 7N STup rMLL.—;�A; ' 5EE DETAILS BASEMENT °• I BASEMENT >� DGTAILD WALK -NJ i "b. NK 1 CL ., _i BATH BATH JSTAI;�.�' NINI R i.5 NT Wq, 6ll/.NO/ ha Irv( W4L`<T. wAL iaWi N1 r r 1 I�(L 1 iw M. w4t , E j l l STAIR 'h" Z Dr ITw1]1e1• i 'IIIyI�JII IZ 2•.4' O LL < rn j J TOR FlT/ ' ' 2.e IM WeLL �D�rwB3NA1 ! �e �.Tpl IIT/ • YM M.'MLL �/1RB910w ' 3 y �- I M,� � IN dL ______—_________—_____________________________-- r r I r r _____—------- ____---- —__--- _____________ ;-------------- _--------------------------- Y UNFINISHED ijNEXgA ATEI i nvwf UNFINISHED VNEXgA AR4 j O j I S(I.O nALI UTILITY I r i SL UTILITY ANNv! RYr•J ' I I ! , j AGow MwJ ' � I ' � O 00 � r i UNEXCAVATED i I --_' I UNEXCAVATED I I L--'-' Do ' jY fY pI W°OE j j �� Ye0 r1J 4PgpE I I I N > .1 jk j i la ! I I i m N I I rj ----rr' r r N ----- — ---------- --- - -- --------- NOC jI ------------ -------- r, , --- j - r ; = ------------------- --- --------� ; -------- ----------------L ------ a--- —_ J j L _ _y. J 1 j I I/ BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN w/ WALKOUT BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN O UNIT TYPE "BR WALKOUT' ALLOWABLE PATIO AREA FIMT FLeON. .SBI 50 FT. T°ru m+mFT. cexncE Loa so.Fr a T, °L__�°. 5 vaLurvE xs.eao cu FT � s i 16.25 FTC orFosl 4 OFLgIK WNbINIL a WD. DECK OR Y a BLUESiONE 5.67 FT „♦_� 51 PAVER IO'cOLIMN T-{' Ly. covers o n g$ V PRE 4 _________-_;_-------- V �oF V •_' •-' q-Ar Rax peLOH ° �= g 1".e, ,y3)61 C$!'ITIHNPSih3'Sni 5]h3 CSIT Sih3 CS4r S]45 CSxi 51 3 CSxi S)ES CSMi 3)h3 SIT S'13 CW (2111. CSx]''15'SEV,A) ]rb (rYv) jT z"zµ"ISFb6b 'i-"71 aFTIOHM.%' FeASTER yl FI®'AD pAi BATH -I R 1 m IMr@I -� WING 'HEYTI r ROOM i a - KITCHENY-4+LFFIT C�ATQ: O O �ail f4 MASER L __ 21. I.T, TL 1 I Z BEDROOM -- a-o• ♦`e° 4 IEAl9R o, p e ! eLp. Hr� > k'PI {a' FILL w/ W IZffI °v°s. ]'-l0• !i ` Ss• Flx. M {e• Im•.. i 4r 1 i O• � � I !x 51tl1E1¢ r♦ v N y � I, %-HIGH >✓` I `________ � EMEAw RFi per/ !f I R (n 16'°IY ; 9 91ELG _ xM'gRNL ' e. s� 4' , Q (^V ..16 �.' a "l PANTRY DRY xM9RAIL _ O m art " us r Z a o ti°e T R ROW OOM NING s* STAIR e _ AL LL Q N °R" IO 2a i D - AwL /JL we n ' • we w I a yi O V�IG - p'•I•Ldllxp .i . ',rvi wHALL 3b'vNili j Fb MUDROOM } Y D I ^z}eo- ]L9 °r 3� BATH G {,a• y y uv °'°>. ^ I '.SiLWF1 • G cLu. Hry I :_ O _ I m h woe u ' of >- iwurMt®OOOwIR Crv4 FOYERA)6ap: �¢ m ♦ a a4 ^+ {a i GELOH STONE 4) RACE i '° �' r$• 4 501Dp ATZ (� TIL I C 9 u• BEDROOM 03 n m Qin _ (9� m GARAGE +� A i 1 1 BEDROOM •1 xr. r Ico N DEN L G ([y�99 e6Rasw d m C CV • I I %' M FI®AB I it J�, i fJ/ LIHI9T 3X6 f p Y 1 1 C pAS FRUTLAce I I Llwr NAI.VI!vG I I O F zs5s zs3s csnl C csnr n3s cszs ` ^` 1 1 pbm I GsaRsa(c� csnr csni - N I , I no 1 1 CL 1 ih OrBR OVERxE40 I � O Q '-5' p'9• ]C5S F C i • -T b 6) 2�5 GSM! U13G55 CSni $ ^ 3'-i G4' G'- T - 24• SHI. 1y 4'-I' q•-IF[ 1'-Ili.' I'-♦�' MW 10 `. FIRST FLOOR PLAN SECOND FLOOR PLAN • ' su.e v4•• r-o• 2 s�.m vc- r-R• R T UNIT TYPE "BR" F�ASi FLOOR X�J 50 Fi [OHD iLCOR I. $SO.fi ALLOWABLE PATIO AREA RT^ R air c.nwcE 4a°so.FT R 1. 4' S. VMIME S56W CV Fi t OMJCI'ICR fLVVR rLM1Y� RV CLCYNI VR auu: I/R 1'i• BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN w/ W*LKOUT a : v4+ -a UNIT TYPE "Cl WALKOUT" ALLOWABLE PATIO AREA vyma eaFe er wir 9G�E1Exi 1u6 m.Fi Flp$r iLUOx G $U.Fi fi reL 1NtmFr Uexe4E e» m.Fr. VOLUE n.ev aFr 0 r 4 ^3 W Z y O 1 J 2 N T Ude7 = N N J � J N e o e 1. r B uura� O �VJ Y a_ O �I Z LL O i m N T i UocLo Qj N f- O N Z J r- L c C Qi J N x..... nv. ra• UNIT TYPE xxC1if ALLOWABLE PATIO AREA BPSFI£Ni: hI SO Fi fY6, ilOgt I,ttt $O.Fi Fi i i01. J.Nx SO Fr tx0 50 Fi vu�£ xv.ldx WFi 30 FT 12 .17 FT .�-fe• 'o'coXc1 �� °'� sazonRee 4 5°X°iuBE II fO0i11S I i 14' I'4" I L-4• L_I• g, :+ u S sLAe � �:� 10' D_ - , y. �BretEK YBL 10. yM- �• 00_ 5 S - ° - u V F o 3 b e 6 ° 1 ___myscsni--_*F�FRFP__r� ______________________________________ I _ _ __ _ ______-- ____ __________________-___________ ______________T.�p__ _ ________tE_ u __________-___.__________-_______________� , r_____ ____________________ ________ _ (5) 2w (iYP1 i q° 4 2.9 ST= MALL 5ff MA L9 � XANpRPIL � t C. I bl , I l I , • i i FINISHED UNFINISHED s 3 c UNFINISHED BASEMENT UTILITY -----z UTILITY i BANISHED —- O BASEMENT L-- SEE NOX-M4KOJi ]x, SW M/LLL. ti° ° f BA5EX@M RQAL SEE MTA'LS PLAN F011 'L y' 2. 5T YMLL IIFORMATI(RI IBA C) MI5 nRH� LL N 2b IXi. W A OM4R° Z aD p WALK-IN Q m ^ BAT O N E LT , ' O Z B) �'/NO Y 20 INT WGLL 1� 40 o LL O A NF!CW" i fl Q O Q Z • d W ��EdGTOit PT _ ____ � flIF PGR I r , p DATINpDM Q11LIK Q STA YNLL �[ IN EIMJ I'IF111fL W'OATERI V I2110MC4910N l U ` X SLAB ] W L. XW_WKKPIf BA$fMEXr ♦LOaR INK UNEXCAVATED �� 0 RAN FOR j UNFINISHED I INFO ATId N UTILITY y2° 4RAOE j A E _ TX15 AREA -1 , - i m • 3� j E _ 1 :V 1 L----'----- I - -------- --- ---- ------- _ i ; IC ---------, L--------------- ' ------------------------------' ._ -- ------------' I -- - --- ---------------------------CN 1 '''� °• j 21 y 'r l r__ ni � I �UNIXCAVATED; I IL % T CD BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN w/ WALKOUT BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN E • U s<.Le lu'• r-o- scar Iu•. r-r E-1 .yyUNIT TYPE "C2 WALKOUT"2�`TyL S°.ii. 01 yU.FT.ALLOWABLE PATIO AREA 15y Fi1 $°.ii..ue W FT e u+r-o' 30 FT oNros�re s' w we � h ._,. occRiw CVMORI.IL WD. DECK OR BLUESTONE � 5.88 FT {{gg PAVER C.51 :�`a tl9 sL (MT ROOT E¢DH — LOVEMy>'p G < 0 It _____-________________ __ i L_. _ = C WA AIL W ABO✓E� 1z -- f' eP X �' I • - A�VE BRAOE , )>p3 <SM 1 I)6I Clni TEH°EIRD 3]!3 6Mi 3165 Clni ry TEemEAEu 31" 1. 1T 3]!3 U70 C!W 3]63 CWT 3]p! I-T , , C)nT _ ______________ ______ �i,.i i N TEIPEIHD Z TEMPERED TEn°E1E0 ifMENED r x' wen j j I •t , , nANPR/•IL �liii i e BEDROOM R2 I . , , LIVING ________ ROOM MASTER `' " '---- ' ' - BEDROOM [ 4 - STAIR r 4 _ Is-e$ O xw .RerAe�• _I F� I 4a wE a I s °3r O , , r , O sorFir, ________, O I = � r-+B- -_ O b *z CL •pr V' iI el a•6 rmJ 3 WALK-IN I h Z m e t MASTER •C.+ CL R BOOM BATH .'8 I i '_' ' �. 1] sb nie N .4 0 O z I .SA 13 LL O I it n LLLIN tiQHALL BATH Z I a i , I - f sole---"`------------------ in wx I o o ._,. n KITCHEN e 2.6 NT �oo&L y. AN Y 36 j v a<' 'd' p E 1i �• i O Pi AL 3 Z wATpt I / I ° WALK-IN 1�1 cl.asEr w s'-6' g c ILIW, TO nnvE �.' i U EN CL Y s,iur m ®I sEF mE x• err eOAAp� I J 0 'o 000a p MAT 2.y4. 6, „ ^ y. ,. a• — . i ' ._ •p _________ rip < m GARAGE Ln V I i6 o U CV n C _ i t x L I e O N pO:p. p UNDRY ❑-__-______ r________-_ , I � 1 I BEDROOM l3 , z e` I I j Z K��I]'OEEP Ie O .• � rp i ' A POYER a a I I j I - h 4 a I iPirOw wn. RA1lD D°°R I I I veI csnr )]d csnT 3]0) csnr � n ni�6y TEMERED I l i Ta_ I I I -� i6yp 295a CIMT ip'p'N'p' OVERXEnD P i p 1 N r •, I (sJ 3H 1EN4RED �° ° 11 I I j s- •- •-�,• i (MJ OI 1pA CSnT • /I\ j 'ALL EBLUESTONE +'- TERRACE i,-,• uewL e- 3 aAlura EI t �� • --- SECOND FLOOR PLAN � /1 FIRST FLOOR PLAN i z sp u IIA•. r aapR MEa ¢z. czn. c3� upr. sole uv r-D• - Q awHrtxL ]vz sD cc UNIT TYPE "C211 RSTFLDd 5,447 ,T G:: 13 FT 6{a4 p 3. i!. 6 ALLOWABLE PATIO AREA D E 3D5 ,5WF1 vau+E. Sz.ue mri vc.ro i37.fT '-6' 15._.O. I 154P I.�. 0.17 FT -44 t' -r '•-r -r �' � r -r, •caw. SOFOr10E PCOTN6 al,�, p•GOML. 1 3.'dE' P sowna Bursrere o a• rr �°w r-r p•+• s• w.-,,. SLAB T._I• "'a• 4§ rV °rt �s a fr , P61�6Y6L tea" 4 _ J. _____ ___ N SIB 5 1 h V ' i � , 1 -TiafaLir � ��-Tii1}iaBe `• � ' f11TJ F ; G � bl P.INM INWlHl4.i6'ee 4 a a IPLEci3ED INTO CHIC. fND. N P.T. Y I NAllE0.5 a la'oc rWl. 9FE EIR. ELEVI.nONS NFwE55® T C ARO. VNLL, 9EE ENT EIF/A}1016 '-� OETALLS FlN61ED BASEMENT A Q > I o i i x Z N Z. Na.w.ucwr E BASHSNT none I O Z N .Ifi pA IN nM5 AREA -] IL . Q Q 1n u o ;( Y r t 0 LJ ---------------------------- _____________________ ____ ____________,r IMINT# Z W 0 M O• DO I j a 0 Lr) Z. NON-HALY.OJf i "' �' ' _ N o. cq I BA9EMlNT ROgt ° PLAN PON yli i t 9 C N IWO ON IN i I n«s AZEA� S g M p --- ------------ i s i� a I ' ----------------------- -------------- I 5 i ------ -ON C!VATE)' ------------- --- ---' ! 144. , _ s k OI I � I WI Raw xlsAv WIT I i 1 BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN wi WALKOUT &UEMBR ..]SOFT BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN su.e vc. r-o• FAST RaaN Ias w.Fr. suu. uA•. r-m $ECOIO Rpp1, IAO]SO. FT. UNIT TYPE "DL WALKOUT" ]00 50 M } ALLOWABLE PATIO AREA i. 3M SNp YNLL. qy SEF VETAIL5 ]W 5TC MALL• °$ pETAILS USFNS11E0 � uiam mom• FlN6HED BASEMEN 4'f v�c • ALK-N FOD a ]HAF � CL CL MaMiM 55' NICN 1 i �T a C +� BATH xe xr. wsu s e. a I I ,L ��i . � e� N OIM PLAT py; 1! Of STC MALL I , xvec UNFINbHEO i UTILITY MPJ I r• $• Is'- I '� EIFC EX.TQIfIT/ 1 M•N5' P� � PYIFl UNIXCAVATED ' i I �I rsNmvM• i 4LAB M CRaDE al i ' I p� I ' i 1 ' saMollee _ ---------------- ------ If_I 11' •_a• 37 FT GOEWOSITE ".„VJG �GKINb WY✓DRAL 7.67 FT WD. DECK OR BLPAVER E IS'LOLLTN PAVER AE O Fl.rr RaOF ' GONERS I'-9' 1 P-9 `• LaP tff rMLL 2FLOM ` OW 69ARLAAIt --------- _--------- —____-__________ ___ _gym _____-_-___--_ «� b w Eure sb _ _ a - R H. ABOVE b b• _ _ L-J L_,._� _ u 6RIOE p J J- l0. « _________________ __________ _______ _____________ __ ... _________________________ t O. a iEMEaE° TEWERM 0. TEw RE° YEMERO _ J EPON PAR - A ' T 4 tzl zoo can n zRse csnr n M. csnr z zRs csnr se csnr • TEMER°�j• b IEnPEREU q 36' M PREFAB r I - 5 5 ]xb Ib O 6A9 PIRB°lKE S p -- -- --- „BATFfA SEAT Imo• i UVING • _ 3 O ROOME. -4 KITCHEN TER �)t MASTER m Y BEDROOOM 'T kuY'JO ;Si j RAN ' _ ,L WALK-IN €a - I]' CFEP < CL PO• - 11'i• ' SBPPT ^• IN I Y REF n - I]'L7990PPIr - b'_Ip• yp:• '£w r p PANTRY Y 'N 3 i s °° '<s" ; z a s� , Cl! BEDROOM MF I O O E ours a-o•�y1 - I O Z a DINING WALKAN i LL d coot. ROOM T- • T-1/j' 9lDF® CIL n kL O Q Y) vAo , , r CL _ 0 I B41' - Pl'4 I' V A' tii sIV la'R b I iM VT W, M9 6 5„Elf MUDROOM O •Vi, � Y , R'O• S -HRRI HALL T HANDRAIL_r '- �+5• - _ I I I wARoi 0 iNr w fLAUNDRY = IMELRNL bLOP® ' } 6 S 0, SNEIF WALL .q f I Pe Bp•xSp• ,Eyw /. 'S u j .11 EwTER Cl 6� R• WA I ATnc j i9 LU O f7 05 HE. PE° •_y ACGE56 •� I �, O GLOSEr 9xx RJy MN RATED LCLR lyyj" S' �i iii I] �' m PIAMR LAV F (�I 9TRIPPEO I RCO - I ` , Q' N BEDROOM B2 w - BEDROOM 03 0. a Gouty« ro «A.s %' R I N . s•- TrrE •x• ew BOAIm� Lr FOYER i t GARAGE , i V -� n�' Z 0 I i . M. BATH ` « M N3 J b;. + I I w ° I Al ^p Ir DEN 4T'%so I IIIalal)cw b (z)zsi LY+r 'uwraA a zw csnrill i§ Y d BLUESTONE I r A'_b. 'r_ s•-a$ r_ �•-0. b. V 1ERRACE r azzxe I'N• �ay.a °°vEREeAB o ttrP� � , r ))W 9A ))50 • ' , « csnr cvli r-i r, ulE OF W+11 MON n'•�' Flo°a AaEA ro- Yur 9e4nEur e6s s°Fi - /1 FIRST FLOOR PLAN Rsnlaw .ales°ET �COND FLOOR PLAN suir vc- r-a- UNIT TYPE "DL" R°LN,E A>)eT°°ET YL�I� ALLOWABLE PATIO AREA ° ~ A 37 FT ' - -- ---- - - 1 1I v0u.17 FT t'r it caua 1 r eeuc Aevde� t r +,,4 i � rodrnl. anwo`�.e 9 j aubrwc 0E2.e5rwe r I'.I• 14• YoonNn P•1• ' Ir YI1 I /1hY<nNflYLL.TLE59Y30H®. $B,EUtIAM%sIMSIT(\LO@.N-\ p-p9a\ -ABlL\pNPYT3Olf.1MN1NX�wf•As LxtFIT.bbIJl/uOgFAr•4ieNON"a<l�eI3nAM..__.�s@Iw�NwBc«AmS+.wEu,i'I bMrL�wEaaN�Roieiii 'Ii;j nmr1TrpE�$Cd.LLNN!'. 1/. 4AR^S'vJT1l'JP-0Xt03'T.{6G9RT_O��N.DAL�.iWIRp10B61... IIiI•,I ;:iSi�LI . : I n , J t. "" ____ _ _u. _a _Omd_MRN _V4J_iR.Ajµ _te - m'iNo_-yi L Fe -%a nLLME_oRYL ow2s ND W•"_ . ;J Y 1NYGos'wQ uT_ sU_rCI wA_ EiFa_;EeI Ev ._r_R Nl�YY1961 .S 37 FT 7FT €; Iaa I]' LIIEQYa)LL 66pH MTWp:?RL'YI Vie= -'S. S �N ig WSATEW L� �i .� N. _ _ _ _ _ _ PO'I PAN - B'-y5 s se-7S - t t U) EM9 C 7 4)1 CW Q) 2959 [SNi ftI M. csv SnT rewEPEp h to »B r - B' ______ _-__ _______________ I - qW CIL Sp. Pa PI�w Cl Q SAS FlNIMA[! F I aIt - 3 i i MASTER ,E o �_ BEDROOM- - - n 4' I 4' 1]'O�Y T Jd N EV 2 2 2 CLS. M. , O. 2 4) O D O o Ei < O WALK_w Q .� �•L & CL ala.m i "• pi R T § U O O i i O y 0 'RJD B SHfLf i y L bra s orm O C a. M. } ,y. LUMI HALL OIMIO/ , 3 LA DRY _ Z i IR VO 1°eo aoxso• r ; Lb (V i , -IN e s 6• I / I ap .__- --- _______ - I 04 � Ln WunNa G ROp i Lr Cl tT.l..tD G c o` IlA1lR 8 BEDROOM N3 - `B,• n BEDROOM N2 S I N I - r I y I i q o Wd yy° o a dl � a, 25GJ1 T T II •� "IM, cw PAN ---- ame uWL v IMT: uMK a ruLL B6LM �� B0.9EMEN). ow 90 WXT. FT TOT FLOGt. 1.72 5W." FMTFRM iplpL 4.)20 W.FT. FIRST FLOOR PLAN n SECOND FLOOR PLAN Su)i' 1/L•. L-p• 4PW.E: ]99 WF. Stue' I/Y• p-p• p Y C p UNIT TYPE "DR" ALLOWABLE PATIO AREA ° E ""pFT u.•N a• 90' N IJp By/•ImRNL LVXINS I WD. DECK OR ROOP ABOVE_.- BLUES70NE PAVER _ — 0 Bd .y __-- Q ,°`rexrEHo '�1FMKPED �`TEMrcIED W�tfWTFW 3 -- OB•.I PIeQAD aw PpTSLK1 Q LIVING a£ < ROOM 3o 3i� KITCHEN � N � 14 I'd• _I 14' PAMRY � s• r. r ' 4• DINING Cl � ROOM � `Jyp Cl Jp 9 MUDROOM yo SS• WON Y a•AAoI _ 3V5• in NNOtAa Irvr.W l a ^y s i 1 p. 4._ s. iW IM. W41 FLIE iR C,NSf FW 0 S,W se+cLvslw �o h � CL IeAr07 DJOIK 1�yO°• 6N1IB! )V/LL! ClLINi TO NAVC %• � � ? GARAGE tE k z FOYER � I I I DEN I N. I __ I �lUESFONE I 9 leo,e'oovfwEsp f>r ant (TrP! I]• cpLwr lo• eeLur.Tn � sss9 sss9 sssa coJot mva cswr csnr csnr 4 YLAr YJJ B9dl w'.G• L IE pP NAL_ 3CON ILA- ROOF .,a. d• l• y J y A_W.'K-pL CR OS ^ . , r I bW W NOOM ••.y ESRCn N•DJM W pev'cEs {I ¢, cranes A,V nrhr RAVE RnlArt A ON __ �- -- WALK-M A ft- elellsolcr ES/JE G _ I } CL MASTER - BEDROOM 40 i i G k a. I- �I�� 4 ' I u u MASTER SAT s•-ro" _ \ j rv�ss wrooh ./ pEVCn + re AnOJF sAna \ AIMTp T✓ T YAK RELf 'f 4 1.A18N� `Eu'uI L'G TO HALL — _ 1Lph IGR ... - _- BEDROOM i2 cr .al0. I � : R y.• I R - LOM - j CL a ' j -_ NALL 0 cEnar - 5 BEDROOM 07 � 3L_, mlee6 rllooroW - I - (-- I } '�ess -H°r. 3 GnmxR seven nwr IUK wELLAx KGIARIeeiro AupH roY j :sss csm � i o s j I >ses o! sr! LI ALW.'K'6YTT�R� LiK W WLL N I e. 1p. tl. I 4 I &ROOF5PLA-• 3 SECOND FLOOR PLAN BEW: I,-1'V 10.33 FT BLUMONE /` pp F� PAVER / . � 1 88 i5H CLIP I.. HVMG ROOM i S KRCHEH a'o- la-Ip• .-I ♦ M Mrl. RAIEp S Cl pet e gg A GARAGE V R a' � cnARc ruL_s qI KIEq -X. GEIGTp W.K Ij' x M BOAYp ennnPR e eA td FOYER _ r---------- i I, t I I I • s'-s � ss. I Y I I F 9WEON RACE b '' RACE I I _ .c. � • PPtl'P pVWEIO l'- 1 4 2 FIRST FLOOR PLAN sc.v vc. r-R. UNIT TYPE IIYL11 ALLOWABLE PATIO AREA ! • i O UNFINGHED CRAWLSPACE ] r O j N H Z L i U N I r arYcn.�� O O W e" O Z LOOR1\� wr J YAIFA' i D - : v _ _.Q sc --{a WC I o W � w o r -- I » r�i� aR SNO rl4_ oK rtrRi � n ' rr Y .-------- _5.. j e..e. �_ I_` 0 ( 0 s Z If I I -V. T UNE%CAVATW i �- y w O cy. atl ox cneo! t3i >E J cc •- Ix Ij } I iI g 6 N %CAVARED; I II g Z 0 (V I' E J -Pew I j I O 4 s PLAN a ,D-CltAWLSPACE F g €o � e 6 IRSi 00V ]65V.fi sg 9IDp oze so rr lcc tens xs so.rc !I■ va icLR cu rr r6ou"m6somossid i f � � scar. vA .,ro• 7.88 FT A "I' FIRST FLOOR PLAN Lf scar vw ra UNIT TYPE "YR" ALLOWABLE PATIO AREA Q\ L f r .r Nov e a+ N 4 3WW SswM 635 c • �MntVi'6.✓ � LNL�Il4 ONILl9 TW WK 4lGY _ _Jf.___ _ •�$I i Nec9v.0 `A6 -o ��', ALp `GR sill esoue]wr ewAre WAIK-IN ALAS - CL $ BEDROOM - s i 4 y$ n I .i rC e St.N ]N ENS I JAI. 'X Anw J A H'u' i 1v<b@WLL - N W uN b' 16 [B4P9! Ye1.1N' N W w ne3GVe srwv 4. � LNmNs oevwes i _.vOMS TMr WK IffIF..Nr HALL p eessse]c+exwc - < � BEDROOM 02 $$g S I I '& o a CL BEDROOM sJ eg � S eoi�ss N`OaYG r n LwnM4'JCV'AY p Kc.wa3eU TO W ALSOH NOR 9 �" Nr. E✓rlxNer escANe zuscm wwa Sew RN I 4 ay f ,® SECOND FLOOR PLAN um: vc• r<• J 0 I m _ N i N N i I.LVM. Y' 611]][R i V i ;R:O0F_PLAN LPL '— Nv. r-s• E s O 3 2 i:951 t(Idi 6]p Sp fi. 3C_ o36=ii iaru ew so i9. cww zwmsr s r L wLL.iB. n.cs W f] e va•.r-r i CRAWLSPACE PLAN sc.m. i ,N NG LHIT rnc. v Q 10.33 FT ,.o LIVMG ROOM BLUBIONE PAVER a aL WCHEN WN.A,EDGW< /} GARAGE .`� L WA9[ YM115 � cewu+c To xve K' [� live x srv. aoAen� I I 7,88 FT u v�x (�� f R FIRST FLOOR PLAN sL.Le. vv. r-o' UNIT TYPE "ZL" ALLOWABLE PATIO AREA SECOND FLOOR PLAN scree. vc. r-o• 4 BELCn E n ROOF PLAN �o . 2 L a SECOND FLOOR PLAN suu: vc. ro 10.33 FT i BLUESTONE PAVER 7•88 j w� u u« ewr -w.Eas .scv= UVNG ROOM closer.. wE.r.EA 5-RM�a Kw-!4 FOYER MJ• seLreLoalxs ro.� l+x. 4ArrD oboR GARAGE 6NU8E MILS cease rox.ve 4' r---------- I Y I I 1 1.9 I I I 1 I I I 1 1 1 I i I .ie ux- a La•C �N l 2 FIRST FLOOR PLAN suu: ln•. r-o• UNIT TYPE "ZRII ALLOWABLE PATIO AREA c Cole. n CRAWLSPACE PLAN srw: vc• r<- (-4< oaa 2 4R I o is I � I j N p N % I z t I � r o wwb j O z o A $I I Y I 0 I I d 1= e Z g o O n Il I € IV N _ i H N i Z J I I 2 c I a z 3 0 n..ns. f /--/ (24.0t'( SO p0 JASMINE LANE I L LAW I I 116 16 JASMINE LANE k III II 91 12 JASMINE I LANE i 10 JASMINE LANE 92 , 9 SMEE � E / r 93 JA 2 11 J0 95 5�� 1 a \ \ 36 S� 0� 30' n`p�J`� 2 - . \CIE 0.0 .4. SITE PLAN AMENDMENT NOTES 1. METHODOLOGY FOR IDENTIFYING EXPANDED PATIOS HAS BEEN DOCUMENTED IN THE "SITE VISIT MEMO" DATED DECEMBER 24, 2024. 2. BASE INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED, VIA EMAIL, FROM DTS PROVIDENT DESIGN ENGINEERING LLP ON JANUARY 21, 2025. 3. THE AMENDED DRAWINGS ARE BEING SUBMITTED FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE OF DOCUMENTING PATIO EXPANSIONS WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT. EACH INDIVIDUAL LOT OWNER WITH AN EXPANDED PATIO WILL LEGALIZE THIER PATIO UPON SITE PLAN AMENDMENT APPROVAL. EXPANDED PATIO CALCULATIONS House Number Street Unit Type 1 Patio Area Outside Columns Allowed (sf) 2 Patio Area Outside Columns Measured in Field (sf) 3 Net Additional Expanded Patio Area (sf) 4 1 Honeysuckle Lane DL WALKOUT 6.17 181.92 175.75 3 oneysuc a ane BR WALKOUT 2.71 71.54 68.83 5 -TFo-neySUCkle Lane BR 92.08 542.50 450.42 7 P oneysuc a ane DR 259.00 284.38 25.38 g oneysuc a ane C2 176.25 281.89 105.64 6 Jasmine Lane C1 WALKOUT 10.00 37.39 27.39 10 Jasmine Lane BL WALKOUT 2.71 196.50 193.79 3 Mulberry Uourt C1 WALKOUT 10.00 153.54 143.54 q Mulberry Court C2 WALKOUT 5.00 51.67 46.67 5 u erry Court A WALKOUT 2.76 73.61 70.85 3 Rose Lane C1 95.47 109.25 13.78 8 Rose Lane BL 92.08 119.00 26.92 1 Lavender Lane DR 259.00 423.75 164.75 2 Lavender Lane C2 WALKOUT 5.00 106.49 101.49 3 1 Lavender Lane C1 95.47 127.46 31.99 4 Lavender Lane A WALKOUT 2.76 13.72 10.96 5 Lavender Lane A 97.18 179.46 82.28 6 Lavender Lane C1 WALKOUT 10.00 152.40 142.40 9 Lavender Lane C1 95.47 256.67 161.20 11 Lavender Lane A 97.18 138.39 41.21 13 Lavender Lane C1 95.47 187.67 92.20 17 Lavender Lane A 97.18 203.19 106.01 18 Lavender Lane C1 95.47 194.79 99.32 19 Lavender Lane C1 95.47 227.00 1 131.53 21 Lavender Lane BL 92.08 206.25 114.17 27 Lavender Lane C1 95.47 205.33 109.86 1 Primrose Lane BR 92.08 295.49 203.40 3 Primrose Lane C1 95.47 161.25 65.78 4 Primrose Lane DL WALKOUT 6.17 85.76 79.60 6 Primrose Lane BR WALKOUT 2.71 167.47 164.76 10 Primrose Lane A WALKOUT 2.76 72.25 69.49 11 Primrose Lane C1 95.47 149.83 54.36 12 Primrose Lane C1 WALKOUT 10.00 210.08 200.08 9 Gardenia Lane ZR 81.38 108.50 27.13 13 Gardenia Lane YR 81.38 91.92 10.54 Total Net Additional Expanded Patio Area (SF):3,613.45 1. THE ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN, DRAWING BXX-0 DATED NOVEMBER 18TH, 2020, FROM THE KINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT CLUSTER XX PERMIT SET OF DRAWINGS, WAS USED TO IDENTIFY HOUSING STRUCTURE'S UNIT TYPE (E.G. "A", "BR", "C2 W/O-). UNIT TYPES ARE IDENTIFIED ON THE ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN. 2. ALLOWABLE PATIO AREA LOCATED OUTSIDE STRUCTURAL COLUMNS WAS IDENTIFIED USING ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EACH UNIT TYPE. PLAN SETS WERE DOWNLOADED FROM THE VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK'S PROPERTY FILES AND LAND USE RECORDS ELECTRONIC DATA BASE "DOCSRB" 3. FIELD MEASUREMENTS OF BUILT CONDITIONS WERE TAKEN BY LANGAN ENGINEERING ON OCTOBER 4, 2024, DURING A SITE VISIT 4. UNITS SHOWN TO HAVE A NET POSITIVE VALUE OF PATIO AREA MEASURED AFTER CONSIDERING THE PATIO AREA ALLOWED HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED AS EXPANDED. THE MEASURED PATIOS DIMENSIONS LOCATED OUTSIDE THE STRUCTURAL COLUMNS OF A UNIT HAVE BEEN DOCUMENTED ON THESE AMENDED SITE PLANS IN BLUE. 05/05/25 REVISED CALC TABLE 1 Date Description No. Revisions C�OF NE�V L 4- ��. -0 r- z z 05/05/2025 SIG E 08147% DATE SIGNED -L FINAN PROFE 19 EER NY Lic. No. 081473-1 40 0 10 25 40 SCALE: 1 INCH = 40 FEET WARNING: IT IS A VIOLATION OF THE NYS EDUCATION LAW ARTICLE 145 FOR ANY PERSON, UNLESS HE IS ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTION OF A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, TO ALTER THIS ITEM IN ANY WAY. LANGAN Langan Engineering, Environmental, Surveying Landscape Architecture and Geology, D.P.0 One North Broadway, Suite 910 White Plains, NY 10601 T:914.323.7400 F:914.323.7401 www.langan.com Project KINGFIELD SITE PLAN AMENDMENT S/B/L: 129.25-1-1 VILLAGE OF RYEBROOK WESTCHESTER NEW YORK Drawing Title SITE PLAN AMENDMENT Project No. 190115801 Date 03/28/2025 Drawn By AP Checked By LM CS-100 Sheet 1 of 3 I � / - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I EXISTING PATIO EXPANDED BEYOND ORIGINAL APPROVED SITE PLAN LIMITS (TYP.) (REFER TO EXPANDED PATIO CALCULATIONS I FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.) I I I I I I - T I / J EXISTING PATIO EXPANDED BEYOND ORIGINAL APPROVED SITE PLAN LIMITS (TYP.) (REFER TO EXPANDED PATIO CALCULATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.) \ i oA , \° � R4 EXISTING PATIO EXPANDED BEYOND ORIGINAL APPROVED SITE PLAN LIMITS (TYP.) (REFER / TO EXPANDED PATIO ux CALCULATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.) 15, 1 \ R30 ' ��0 2 \ 75 A e 74 �73 A ass 0 451- of z o T- N II 22 67 II I, 65 23 -------- X x 2 \ \ 13 \\ \ 14 � \ �OF NE�Y 15 \ \ \ ` y�P�apF.L J. �.r� 0 05/05/2025 16 SIG ofiT473 DATE SIGNED 9QPr 10 AEL FINAN PROFES INEER NY Lic. No. 081473-1 KEY MAP: - � i I• :'j�ih. 17 \ \ ` l � 18 \ 30 0 15 30 �o \SCALE: 1 INCH = 30 FEET 19 WARNING: IT IS A VIOLATION OF THE NYS EDUCATION LAW ARTICLE �IENO�� 1 OF A LICENSED 45 FOR ANY RPROF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, O ALTER THIS SON, UNLESS HE IS ACTING UNDER THE ITEM DIRECTION IN O O 3 �p.NE ANY WAY. LANGAN Langan Engineering, Environmental, Surveying 10AI ER 20 \ Landscape Architecture and Geology, D.P.0 \ �P One North Broadway, Suite 910 y \ White Plains, NY 10601 T:914.323.7400 F:914.323.7401 www.langan.com �NpER \ Project KINGFIELD SITE PLAN \ \\\\ AMENDMENT \ \\ VILLAGE OF RYEBROOK 1 I 1 1 WESTCHESTER NEW YORK Drawing Title SITE PLAN AMENDMENT: ENLARGEMENT (2 OF 2) Project No. Date 190115801 Drawn By3/28/2025 CS-1 02 AP Checked By / / LM Sheet 3 of 3