Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Fire House Site
Dolph Rotfeld Engineering, P.C. N 0 d M E M O OV 8 1�000 P<�� DES;. ic wGkhS TO: CHRIS BRADBURY, VILLAGE ADMINISTRATOR VICTOR CAROSI, P.E., VILLAGE ENGINEER FROM: DOLPH ROTFELD, P.E., DEE SUBJECT: FIREHOUSE SITE S/S HUTCHINSON RIVER PARKWAY DATE: 11.22.00 In order to complete our assignment, a second field visit was made today to review the site conditions. The following are the major issues, which must be considered to determine the site feasibility, based on the two layout plans we prepared. 1> DRIVEWAY The driveway for the proposed facility is in the only viable location along the narrow frontage on North Ridge Street. In order to have safe egress from the property, a sight distance to the south (left side) of at least 360 feet should be available for passenger cars and 500 ft. for trucks. Only about 130 feet is available at the present time. The only way to achieve the required safe sight distance is to excavate to road grade, about 230 feet southward along the easterly side of North Ridge Street to a width of about 25 feet from the existing edge of pavement, an average depth of about 6 feet. A traffic signal has to be installed at the driveway when apparatus responding to a fire exits the site to stop traffic on North Ridge Street. This is not easily accomplished due to the close proximity of the northbound exit ramp from the parkway and southbound traffic on North Ride Street. Vehicles could come too close to the driveway preventing apparatus from making a quick right turn out. The NYSDOT will not allow signalization at the ramp, which would keep vehicles at a greater distance from the driveway. Proper signage in advance of the signal light may not be effective. Dolph Rotfeld Engineering, P.C. Page 2 — FIREHOUSE SITE The location of the driveway in close proximity to the northbound parkway entrance ramp will undoubtedly cause drivers to turn in thinking that it is the access to the parkway. Again, signage may not prevent the mistake. 2> DRAINAGE The NYSDOT permanent sedimentation control basin wil! have to be reconstructed in order to bring the driveway to the proposed Firehouse. A similar stormwater treatment and detention basin will have to be provided for the developed impervious surfaces. Adjacent wetlands will severely restrict the options for locating such a basin. Existing drainpipes will also have to be relocated in developing the site. Since we do not have mapping or as-built information, it is difficult to determine the extent of the work that would be involved. 3> SITE DEVELOPMENT The sloping nature of the site will require substantial grading for the driveway, the building pad, parking areas, and the aforementioned stormwater basin. Adjacent wetlands will require construction of a retaining wall to contain the fill on the site and not damage the wetlands. Sewage will have to be pumped from the site to the sanitary sewer located at the intersection of North Ridge Street and Winding Wood Road North. Access to the sewers on Meadowlark Road or Oriole Place would probably not be possible by gravity. Also, the wetlands would have to be crossed as well as private property. Water, electric and telephone service would be available from North Ridge Street. It is my opinion, that this is not an ideal site. The problems affect safety and efficient operation. Other potential sites should be evaluated in a comparable fashion before a development cost estimate is done on this site. Dolph Rotfeld Engineering, P.C. M E M O TO: VICTOR CAROSI, P.E. FROM: DOLPH ROTFELD, P.E., DEE SUBJECT: FIREHOUSE SITE — E/S HUTCHINSON RIVER PARKWAY DATE: 11.21.00 As a follow-up to my October 26 memo to you, I discussed the proposed site with representatives in the Traffic/Safety Group and Design Group of the NYSDOT. My concerns regarding Items 1-6, as expressed in the 10.26 memo, were shared by the NYSDOT. I believe the Village would have a difficulty in overcoming their objections in obtaining this site. One of the biggest problems is inadequate sight distance to the south exiting the site, a situation that could cause serious accidents. Also, putting in a stormwater treatment basin to handle the run-off from the developed site will be quite expensive. In my conversation I learned that another State parcel between the Parkway and North Ridge Street in the vicinity of Sleepy Hollow Road is available. Should this be something to evaluate? i Memo Date: 11/9/00 To: Christopher J. Bradbury From: Victor G. Carosi, P.E. +i RE Fire House Site This AM I spoke with Dolph regarding the fire house site study. He had recently spoken with Mr. Wickert (sp?) of NYS DOT about any items or issues the state may have regarding proximity of the site to their property,the wetlands, and our access to the site. Mr. Wickert explained the past history of the site with regards to the Villages'request for its use. Dolph identified three'roadblocks" 1. The land is without rights-of-access. I understand from Dolph this to mean that the state will not permit a traffic light at the top of the Hutch exit ramps to control traffic during fire apparatus exiting. 2. Wetlands around the site and the newly built wetlands areas. The state does not want these wetlands disturbed. 3. Other sites. According to Mr. Wickert,the state has suggested before that the Village examine other lands that the state feels would be more usable such as a parcel on Ridge Street. Dolph will be incorporating this information and will follow-up with Mr. Dennison and others within the DOT to prepare a more comprehensive memo with regards to the fire house site. He expects to have a final memo to you within 1 week. His overall assessment of the project at this time is `it looks dim.' When his memo is completed, he would like to meet with you, me, and the Mayor to discuss his findings. vgc Confidential 938 King Street Rye Brook,New York 10573-1226 Village _ Brook Phone:(914)939-0753 Fax:(914)939-5801 Fm To: Dolph Rotfeld, P.E., DEE From: Victor Carosi, P.E. Fam 631-5769 Date: October 31,2000 Phone: 631-8600 Pages: 2 Re: Fire House and Red Roof CC: B Urgent ❑ For Review ❑ Please Comment ❑ Please Reply ❑ Please Recycle -Comments: Dolph Please see the attached memo regarding your memo about the firehouse. Some points need clarification. Regarding our conversation yesterday about Red Roof. Will you be able to have the survey of the selected points done by this Friday? I need these points to verify adherence of the roadways to the approved plans. What is a realistic date to have the other work completed by? The site grading and the impacts on the drainage are very important to the Village and your professional assistance is needed at this time. Please feel free to contact Chris B. directly to further discuss the project and your scheduling. Victor Dolph Rotfeld Engineering, P.C. M E M O TO: VICTOR CAROSI. P.E. FROM: DOLPH ROTFELD, P.E., DEE SUBJECT: FIREHOUSE SITE DATE: 10.26.00 Please be advised we have visited the proposed Firehouse site off North Ridge Street adjacent to the northbound entrance ramp to the Hutchinson River Parkway. A map showing the site was furnished to us by NYSDOT. We prepared two alternative layouts using your architect's building plan and footprint. The property is adjacent to a wetland and according to conversation with representatives of the US Army Corps of Engineers no buffer limitation applies, according to their regulations. Although the conceptual layout fits the site, I have the following concerns. 1. Sight distance for apparatus leaving the site. 2. Right turns out will be difficult for the fire apparatus. 3. Two sets of traffic signals, possibly three, will be needed to stop vehicular movements along Ridge Street and at the parkway exit ramps when the equipment is responding to a fire call. 4. The proximity of the driveway to the parkway's, northbound entrance could cause confusion for drivers coming north on Ridge Street to use this ramp. 5. Some reconstruction of NYSDOT drainage facilities will be required along with substantial grading to prepare the site for the intended use. 6. Sewage will have to be pumped from the building to the public sanitary sewer. 7. Water, electric and telephone service can be connected at Ridge Street If you have any comments or questions, please call. D OCT 3 0 2000 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK DEPT.OF PUBLIC WORKS Memo Date: 9/1/00 To: ChristopherJ. Bradbury From: Victor G.Carosi, P.E. RE: Fire House Land on Hutch Chris: I have reviewed Ken Powell's memo of August 25, 2000 regarding the acquisition of land adjacent to the Hutchinson River Parkway for possible fire house site location. I feel it would be best to meet briefly with our planning consultant and Village Council to gain a clear direction to proceed with respect to this fire house land acquisition. I am able to have prepared any map and supporting documentation necessary for the County. However, I currently have no site plan or any real hard design data with which to make sound judgment for the actual land needs of a fire house. I strongly feel the Village should seek competent professional guidance from a consultant with e)perience designing fire houses. Such consultant would be able to assist with determining adequate land needs. However, if it is not possible at this time to contract for such service, and it is important that the Village act now for land acquisition, I would recommend the Village seek all the land available in the area for general municipal purposes. vgc BRC�v� >9t32 VILLAGE OF RYE BRQDK 938 King Street, Rye Brmk, N.Y. 10573 (914) 939-1121 Fax (914) 939-0242 MAYOR Francis L. Filipowski TRUSTEES Jody H. Brackman Donald Degling Roger Herman Lawrence Rand ADMINISTRATOR Christopher J. Russo TO: Victor Carosi, Village Engineer FROM: Charles Peretz, Acting Village Administrator DATE: August 2, 2000 RE: Conveyance Map As you are aware, the first step in assuming ownership of the State's land on the Hutchinson River Parkway just north and east of exit 29, is to request conceptual approval from Westchester County. On July 26, 2000 I received a call from Dan Morrison of the Westchester County Department of Real Estate regarding this issue. He has requested that the Village prepare a conveyance map of the land in cooperation with the New York State Department of Transportation. I have been informed that the contact person at the NYS DOT is Suzzane Bridges and can be contacted at 575-6102. Fes' Lam. ; 7 he /r STATE OF NEW YORK {/1 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 4 BURNETT BOULEVARD POUGHKEEPSIE, N.Y. 12603 ROBERT A. DENNISON III, P.E. JOSEPH H. BOARDMAN REGIONAL DIRECTOR COMMISSIONER July 18,2000 Christopher Russo Village Administrator Village of Rye Brook 90 South Ridge Street Rye Brook,NY 10573 RE: REQUEST#320 Dear Mr. Russo: We are pleased to inform the Village that the Regional Director has approved your request for the State to release its jurisdiction of Hutchinson River Parkway land for the construction of a new Firehouse. This approval is contingent upon the Village submitting plans to the Department for acceptable modification of the parkway storm water system,as the current site plan impairs the existing system. In addition,SHPO coordination and approval of building plans are the responsibility of the Village. Mapping the area to be released by the Department is also the responsibility of the Village. This matter cannot be progressed until the Village obtains a County agreement indicating the County is willing to release the land to the Village. This agreement may take the form of a Resolution from the County. Traditionally the County requires the requesting party to prepare a County Conveyance map prior to making such resolution. This map must be created to Department standards and approved by the Department right of way mapping group. A sample of such map has been enclosed. Please contact Mike Parella in our mapping unit at(845)431-5835 to obtain the parameters for making this map. Upon receipt of County approval,the Village will need to present the approved map and agreement or resolution to this office to be forwarded to the Property Executive Review Group where final approval must be obtained. If you have any questions regarding this matter,please contact me at(845)575-6102. Very truly yours, Suzanne M. Bridges Real Estate Specialist II by: tancy S. f ind of Way Agent JUL 2 1 L'U1�0 'M -NSB enclosures cc: M. Parella,Design,Region 8 ---'— -- p �e - .. . C. ahue' �e�-' � �,a n a crc�u � �'�= �- ► PARCEL J. 52 � _LINGS—POUGHQUAG am ,�, rn. ( DUTCHESS COUNTY �'��"�'�� SHEETI OF 3 SH E STATE HIGH -WAY NO. 8525 �-00 SURVEY NOTES ON FILE AT NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTA710N REGIONAL OFFICE N0, 8 LOCATED AT POUCHKEEPSIE, NEW YORK coo U" EQUALITY so o yo ►ter ioo STA 106+97= po � STn S107+00 Scale Bar 1" a 50# y CHI 2 BENT REBAR W/PH LEH > (..A n, c,� ALL nes ARE z � 5TA n ` cHisetEo •x' 5133+35 y �.°t"�ao� o�aouTs No STA; 5133+50 OFFSET; 60' V' MN 71f CHA 2 srA; s134+00.84 os OFFSET; 48.32' MAP 1 � P� � 1938 � CHA 2 1 , o R=2910.00 0T=05.5' L-50017 9' PROPERTY TO BE Ch=S25'05'43"E QUITCLAIMED TO 996.55 �rn w F V, *N i UNION VALE If/t 7i� L rowN or UNION vni_E a (reputed owner)0 10 �, � � (52) w oo � V; AREA = 240745 :k Sq,Ft rn or 0,568 t Acre 7 ON- 0. CP Ar 0 oGZQ 1�$k6 Con tlnuad on Shea t 2 G 0ILL11vvJ—I vv v1 1wvI %.. TATE HIGHWAY N06 8525 I"'TCHESS COUNTY Jr�tti i yr 50 0 50 FEE T 100 Scale Bar 1 " = 50, � k 60 �0 MAP nun 0 1 \iD k BENT R.R. SPIKE CHISO 'X- CU" RAIL POS T ( TOP ) / a"sEtao 'X- *F OU10E RAIL POST (TOP) PK NAIL IN POLE NYT 216 do 16 0 C A U1 $ �o Q CHA 1 STA: S139+3,0 OFFSET: 75' � .p� (f) Nrr 71e ti � „J Ch=S25005'43"E 996,55 � .o 0 Ste, • � � \ � STA\ 141+65 �9 TOWN OF UNION VALE � � xao 2Q (reputed owner) �1 � sue\ y� � MAP 14 R —�j IR STA 0 0 PROPER I l' i v nt S143+51 , QUITCLAIMED TO '��I Gt. • TOWN 0F STA: S144+03.09 x�OFFSET: 10,66 � )r UNION VALE P7 E— '�a��3�a'. �, STA 144• ���` q sra stagy 52 S1'OFF'S�t4 22 � ` �'� x x AREA = 24,745 t Sq4Ft . or 0,568 f Acre �s�°o Q STA S149+40 Continued on Sheet 3 - UILLIP'' STATE `:�—rvvkin vvr+v HIGHWAY NO. 8525 DUTCF, S COUNTY SHLt I s ur Z)ht� w In the Town of Union Vole, County of ss, r parcel of property hereinafter designated as Parcel No. 52, situate All that piece o p P P w York as shown on the accompanying map and described as follows: ,• , ,, State of New •, Parcel No. 52 existing Blllin s - Poughquvg highway, said point being 60 feet BE,,ir�1,;, of an angle point on the westerly boundary of the 9 g ascribed survey baseline for the . � ,• at right angles from Station S 133 + 50 of the hereinafter d y a highway dis i ;.,, • ies terl measured 9 9 Y' Highway No. 8525; thence through the bed of Billings -- PoUg qU g 9 Y rr,,c;unstruction of the Billings -- Poughquog, State H g Y feet to 0 point 48.32 feet distant westerly, courses and distances: 1) South 30'--31 �-30" East, 52� f P radius of 2910.00 the following three (3) i asellne• 2 thence along a curve to the left having a from Station S 134 + 00.84 of sold b . , of said baseline; and ' measured of right angles southwesterly, measured at right angles from Station S 144 + 03.0 , feet, 1001.49 feet to o point Io.66 feet distant sou Y� of said existing Billings -- Poughquvg highway, said 0'-33" East, 46± feet to a point on the southwesterly boundary baseline; thence along the 3) South 26 2 measured at right angles from Stotion S 144 + 48± of said bas point being 22± feet distant southwesterly, 9 9 d distances:(1)northwesterly 531� feet to o paint P the followin two (2) courses an last mentioned boundary of sold existing highway g northerly 580.2 feet to the `�5 feet distant westerly, measured at right angles from Station S 139 + 30 of sold baseline• vnd (2) point of beginning, e innin bin 24,745 square feet or 0,568 acre more or less. 9 • he Count of Dutchess by virtue of the following deeds drawn portion of the property listed below which was acquired by t Y Being o po P from the following mops: Mop No, Type of Taking r Deed Liber. and Poe 9 Filed in Dutchess County Clerk's Of flee 13 r _2 Fee Liber 571 Liber 571 Page 474 Page 474 1939 January 14, January 14, 1939 14. r--? Fee construction of Billings -Poughquog State Highway No, is o onion of the 1938 survey baseline for the re Transportation and described as The above mentioned baselineP ion on file in the Office of the State Deportment of 8525 County of Dutchess os shown on v map and p fOIIQWs' •_ ' Station S 141 + 65; thence South 40'-13'--00" East to Beginning of Station S 133 + 35; thence South 17 35 -- 30 East . to Station S 143 + 50, thence South 40'--14'--30" East to Station S 149 + 40. All bearings referred to MAGNETIC NORTH as the needle pointed in 1938. HEREBY CER i1FY TfinT rFIE PROPERTY DESCRIBED AND MAPPED ABOVE IS NOT NECESSARY FOR HIGHWAY PURPOSES, AND THE CONVEYANCE THEREOF IS RECOMMENDED. THE REMAINING UNAFFECTED WIDTH IS IN ; EXCESS 0F �• EET. ' ----1996 PpIIKERNIL REGIONAL DESIGN ENGINEER FOR THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR OF TRANSPORTATION REGION 8 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTAHUNPROPERTY FOR THE CONVEYANCE NEW YORK STATE DESCRIPTION AND MAP I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS AN ACCURATE DESCRIPTION AND MAP MADE FROM AN ACCURATE SURVEY, PREPARED, UNbER Oy , b'IRECTION, ;. n 9 SDOA � LA IS vZr'• Z. 3 _1996 DATE _ .-...___------__t-_ LCHARLE UG HARBOUR & ASSOCIATES E. LENT, LAND S vEYOR P,L.S. ENSE NO. 50049 0 .. BILLINGS— POUGHQUA(3 S.H. N0. 8525 DUTCHESS COUNTY ' ' TOTAL AREA 24,745 t S.F. MAP -NO. 38-C I � OR 0.568 t ACRE PARCEL N0. 52 PROPERTY TO BE QUITCLAIMED TO TOWN OF UNION VALE forth -above for the reconstruction of a port of the Billings--Povghqua9► State ' mop of property provided as set Description and P P P essor for highway purposes. wo 9 Y Hi hNo. 8525, and now found unnec y 9 of the County of Dutchess, pursuant to Section 65 of the Highway and adopted by resolution of the Approved P h e N do o f Z_Q��199meetin held on t L YLow, ot o 9,..._,,.._.. Clerk of the Dutchess County the Count of Dutchess is here ro Y by given p ursuont to Section 65 of the arty above described, by Consent t� the •conveyance property of the Highway Low. ..�.� 17 ---_19_ R.J. S, �AIRECR, REAL ESTATE WASION DATE _..__________... oin co of description and mop with the original thereof as filed in the gffice of the, Department of the foregoing PY id art Inai and of the whole thered`�� I hove compared 9 certify the Borne to be a true and correct copy of ea 9 Tronsportotion and I do hereby Y REAL ESTATE DIVISION DESNN SUVERVISOR --- r % s z JOB MANACUI .-- i - i - c --- Of's1c)"10 Fly M R* HFCKFsz ' fly Tr i! A F I F. D I I Y .0 By CHECKED BY t. CD ---I Fri ac MATCH LINE SEE DwG,' NO. AP-13 cn 0 00 L4 U) cj -4 L4 c - I - 0 -u LA c" C> D 3; it C LIU 0 v#1/ L4 L4 v t I-,u -u C) r J. j DU Ali Q) CA U1 s j + f ry) 0 U — w 0 LA- C) LA -V r- L4 uj 11b LY) `60 N co 0 0 0-4 clu :u vq Ln C) M cn c; cz) CD N Ln K C-) CD L4 (A rN) 0 0 * j -A AL4 0 00 % --j C), C) C> c::) L*j b C) a 1 -A CD L4 N) a) 00 L/) Ljr w U I (it CcaV) C) ILI > 2-- 19 I Z r%j C) CD 0 0 OX :u Fn —I 00 CQ C c D r LA K C) 0 c:: [> -A -- 1- rl n Lit Lovim. CID -u 13 o< n L4 U, CE) W W A :7- 0 a - . wtA co (A 0 L-n N LD -4 -c IL (11 t j?4 -4 U11 <:> i_n 1> P" Y 0 C) 16 Ul L.04 (Ij W A 0 co rQ W C) LD vi I co -4 -4 LD co al 0) a 0 pt. zz; uq C) c- i. :]c IQ "]U Lp 1-0 LA L4 N) L0 -4 Ln 64 V1 c- 00 0 1 �, m co (1) 0 'u LD 10 LP 9L 'k CD � u C) Lit p- (- O fit c:) rn LD C-13 ;u CD NN C) n W C" 19 rh )..- — I'T1 r (A co IN UtU Ou V) C) .moo Lo W W 0 0 fTj on Ty < fit x (A I 0 CC) > un 0 C) I- C: > CD =F- CD sr so �pp '0* 01 C-> P- for V) ;tlT CO CD rN) ;7 C) CD Ut- Jtl-,111-0 III ---- _ ...- -- - _ . ,li. �v i -- -- -- ---�__ t.. t imikfLU o i . �_---- --- -- - - l,ttnt t t.0 tJ ( .......... (:IIECYJ71) (lY i,tU r �\ x r' (T� V1 a _i �j A n� X �f f W � SE o jy c N0 q ?�'N i qA tea 33 9t� a Jot) GESIG?iL At DESIGN SUPERVISOR JUEI MANAUEll .._.�_._`_ _..._ ut OOLU Ur ,_,__..�.,�4._ ,Y.,,• l iLLr LU UT LyII AILU Ur Ultnr ILU Uf �I,,�.� +�►i�u Afq SE F ORA�INC N0' CA,� 9 C7 fn x � t� fit C) r :v U S1^1:�:U U; Cll! �riCU UY hI{�� f'Jl; ESY11,lA f CU UY -- _ 011A►- TE.0 ll i _ '/� U rIIr'rwr. n nv Pic r— �� m -o "j ri 101 � � � � r� f'l z U p c7>t al L.0 1 Q1 Ql u) ?t rWry ♦ r N r N 2 Cj p _ W ClLj d W A f'1 � • Cn lJt � ♦ C cn O QQ� N � 0Ln Ca b D• � f71 i--(l0O 'ON 'OMa ]IS ]NIA HO1dW LA rn r►lyl o:r�i((��CQ'C-3C.)Cj _--�• �_ rYl V1 c�� 1� � �- �C � � i t ;7 C) t/1 at Vi C) 0 a r-- o Ul o I,)?!: (VIFri v o m f' I t �-yj CA m Q r- n ��CD vl� �� �~�N �, r♦l -.� O C3 --1 ._1 7_ C7 }u x . ^ r (C1rri-gyp c) _ C' C:)vl ULIAUN '11.;PO4VIjUil .,�. juu ►.(miiiu(.I( �___._____ lJ ' t v :ti _------ ..�. 1 Ilil � � ! � + � 1. I I ! . t. r. !. u t I t' _r-__ _-- __.__ .� !.., ! ! !,1 �1 I t . U t l Y 1 . j u ;, , . IE.0 OY �.0CIIECKf.0 t)Y _ �L_____� 1*l v r �� f ► 1 � A. l./l (^ � N ' • Ao N �- w U f'►t .,., ul - � W vl m 13 -,r -,r __.. C3 tq N liJ co . 4 Lom LitW vl j W►J, Ul _ WCl N cn 2 ul / _ W U •-4 V1 , J (J] / / V1 "Ih `n b 01 r / 1 / 1 ' 1 � � t , i f 1 ► ► t , o 1 I oILA VC_v I c ► z 3•- I a --t ` 'A rc �v / o r- b s- r, x, r, r •-• 1.1 fit z (:) J • • .i. of al N vl Ql , (. (n tL t. v► W --1 PO Ln ... .11.. ` W�CEJ C� W C � C7 N b w .. w LA x -u m al m cn A A V 1 C-- • A W • .rta W • .A W N cn , W N t'1 N O"1 cn W Ql 1► , W rn (n . CO IT N . CO N m f000 Ul n C�7 Oyu ad a0 M m O l.f 70 C) --i C) U ~� f- .0 • —' 1o1 Irl _L :J'. CD (n (n crt W IT {�► A .� LA - lfi � ° w 4S1 z 0 vl K v► x E3 Gu h p -p --( T I NN N n1 co OESICN SUPERViSO(s 57 JOB MANAGER . JJC DESICNEO UY YLK CHECKE.0 BY EPK ESTIMATED BY EPK m al al I m cn rn of al m m 0l m C7 -+ fV W " UI U -+ N W la V1 DRAFTED BY CCU. CHECKED OY TI.K d1 pl Cll (n m m U N W 1. V1 I I I I 1 I ! I ► I I I 1 I I ' i I I W ! O O I I { o I w I-.Abcc 0-0 I I Lr ► b I �. � I N N O O O I 400 w I 400 W • � r i w • I .► CD w C C4 v► C3 ►� 1 O I .. I r s � � r . 70 O O O I m o r �ci I I Iw I I fx iou t I X 1 `n 0 L o rf r c� ' r 0 N rn I z I I I I o I IC3 70 I rrl Q O Q I M Z O C3 N t/► C, m oo x A z I -� Vrl n y m r-- I s (A r.2 rn v► ( nlCTI ._. ---� yy d� Ln r-r 1 U ►-� -1 r' Q coH--A CDU) a-� f� r-' O fr1 n 1 O —1 �- C!1 Tr o o -� O C Ia r-n I r 1 ---A .� L ::JE-: C7. cal ..Da (::3 Ci ?i ? < U) Y' r r m T -1 r,� z o ,I C7 f l Z N rT . o N -rr- DESIGN SUPERVISOR PA WONLOACII J01) MAIrAGER Q J-WORBACN DESIGNED OY D. CRAVES ClIECKF:Q By R• CORTON ESTIMATED BY DRAT Teo BY CHECKED OY N N N N N ILL) N z 0 C O Ci 00 U I �1 h U l N h N C.� N � 00 tl) A +'` h tp -h Ut _Z:x EA )-> Z r, co W ►V N h -t- -tom 41- O 0 v� vl Ul Cn u1 O 51 O O n rat -� -� -► 0 0 0 -� -� -� o v --+ 0 0 o �,, m o, N I--, � T �. 0 (A G1 G1 G4 G1 c.,t G, o -l: o � r f*1 cn z r�l 0 ?1 v I Z. � � z O O w r•, D z CD � j p z Fq C � x�Fl, -+ rq m O fz rr� n� f1 rny C).r 7� V) o o z �m0 VJ Z 7u 0 r- Q i to Fn U z r- O -u m rrl ;70 ' C � fTl (�N m 0i�r r' rn z °$ T > � ZA O O o v 0 T x C7 n v o m rf-� � t� rn n CA a rn to LA I r- r:{ I-u r� I 1dd'� � M3i11�1 v, r J -v _U a co C) (7 z o� o z lc �, m 0 L„ LnX- -- r �n Y r— r•� ul T O O x to r 0 .-- z Uri W r m aE X rTl o "� rrA fTl pp 7C 0 P - o z m � T , � 0 Q7 r- z anc 0o M �' A CI C7 r� WII t� > � a --� o Cn o a CD z Pi p rt, 'O ` A� O A q t/� ►.. M o o m JN) z w ►n o JJ M Olt f tCno O v e � � O)�- ILA orylM 'p„�yr _ CA �cr�azo 'r'3 rn Mfn N 7 O C)T„ f`1^� IA XNOx al0� v to -r- N-� � �' � m m r) �� --� g° . � z i rn U -{ n C7 W O O T Z z O N z �3C-)� �z� � --J � C� z o v �4 �C' r R� z x ro� M tA pni v► t" z LA C Ar Ole lee C.� �f � �� � � '� �v� _o \`,.ram ...-- �! �, `r,� ��,''•�� 0 4t(14 Al 406 lit Ie yJ (' r .�'"/ �" `,' ter" ���� • r Y;`�� ,j� � W \j �/ ,�� ���[� �,r '\,;`• .✓'"ram '��� M '".".,,,� � � �' �� �.f�J � ✓ ' 00 oo- 0 n;`� A Zm ti �4 Lb 2� Q,o G' Fo I P, ti # a • bo4, 0 f /f 0 tA b2 ,N Nos A01-04 •b Z . I All r � r � I ' 41 bb �b 7. �80 VV � LAY w�ti.. \ ` t J • r. 11/22/2000 14:42 9146315769 DOLPH ROTFELD ENG PAGE 01 Dolph Rotfeld Engineering, P.C. M E M O TO, CHRIS BRADBURY, VILLAGE ADMINISTRATOR VICTOR CAROSI, P.E,, VILLAGE ENGINEER FROM: DOLPH ROTFELD, P.E., DEE SUBJECT: FIREHOUSE SITE S/S HUTCHINSON RIVER PARKWAY DATE: 11.22,00 In order to complete our assignment, a second field visit was made today to review the site conditions. The following are the major issues, which must be considered to determine the site feasibility, based on the two layout plans we prepared. 1> DRIVEWAY The driveway for the proposed facility is in the only viable location along the narrow frontage on North Ridge Street. In order to have safe egress from the property, a sight distance to the south (left side) of at least 360 feet should be available for passenger cars and 500 ft. for trucks. Only about 130 feet is available at the present time. The only way to achieve the required safe sight distance is to excavate to road grade, about 230 feet southward along the easterly side of North Ridge Street to a width of about 25 feet from the existing edge of pavement, an average depth of about 6 feet. A traffic signal has to be installed at the driveway when apparatus responding to a fire exits the site to stop traffic on North Ridge Street. This is not easily accomplished due to the close proximity of the northbound exit ramp from the parkway and southbound traffic on North Ride Street. Vehicles could come too close to the driveway preventing apparatus from making a quick right turn out. The NYSDOT will not allow signalization at the ramp, which would keep vehicles at a greater distance from the driveway. Proper signage in advance of the signal light may not be effective. 11/22/2000 14:42 9146315769 DOLPH ROTFELD ENG PAGE 02 Dolph Rotfeld Engineering, P.C. Page 2 T FIREHOUSE SITE The location of the driveway in close proximity to the northbound parkway entrance ramp will undoubtedly cause drivers to turn in thinking that it is the access to the parkway. Again, signage may not prevent the mistake. 2> DRAINAGE The NYSDOT permanent sedimentation control basin will have to be reconstructed in order to bring the driveway to the proposed Firehouse. A similar stormwater treatment and detention basin will have to be provided for the developed impervious surfaces. Adjacent wetlands will severely restrict the options for locating such a basin. Existing drainpipes will also have to be relocated in developing the site. Since we do not have mapping or as-built information, it is difficult to determine the extent of the work that would be involved. 3> SITE DEVELOPMENT The sloping nature of the site will require substantial grading for the driveway, the building pad, parking areas, and the aforementioned stormwater basin. Adjacent wetlands will require construction of a retaining wall to contain the fill on the site and not damage the wetlands. Sewage will have to be pumped from the site to the sanitary sewer located at the intersection of North Ridge Street and Winding Wood Road North. Access to the sewers on Meadowlark Road or Oriole Place would probably not be possible by gravity. Also, the wetlands would have to be crossed as well as private property. Water, electric and telephone service would be available from North Ridge Street. It is my opinion, that this is not an ideal site. The problems affect safety and efficient operation. Other potential sites should be evaluated in a comparable fashion before a development cost estimate is done on this site. Dolph Rotfeld Engineering, P.C. M E M O TO: VICTOR CAROSI, P.E. FROM: DOLPH ROTFELD, P.E., DEE SUBJECT: FIREHOUSE SITE — E/S HUTCHINSON RIVER PARKWAY DATE: 11.21.00 As a follow-up to my October 26 memo to you, I discussed the proposed site with representatives in the Traffic/Safety Group and Design Group of the NYSDOT. My concerns regarding Items 1-6, as expressed in the 10.26 memo, were shared by the NYSDOT. I believe the Village would have a difficulty in overcoming their objections in obtaining this site. One of the biggest problems is inadequate sight distance to the south exiting the site, a situation that could cause serious accidents. Also, putting in a stormwater treatment basin to handle the run-off from the developed site will be quite expensive. In my conversation I learned that another State parcel between the Parkway and North Ridge Street in the vicinity of Sleepy Hollow Road is available. Should this be something to evaluate? Memo Date: 11/15/00 To: Christopher J. Bradbury From: Victor G. Carosi, P.E.: ` RE: Fire House Chris: We are currently awaiting the final report from Dolph regarding the feasibility of placing the fire house on the Hutch property. As you know, the chances of this site working are not very good from information Dolph expressed to me. An aftemate location I feel should be given careful consideration is land at Village Hall extending south to Arbor Drive. While not all of this land is currently owned by the Village, I am sure the current property owners, 900 King Street, would be willing to discuss the transfer of this land to the Village for such use. I envision that a two level fire house, with the truck bays and sleeping quarters on grade with Village Hall, and other necessary rooms and offices on grade with Arbor Drive, can be located here. Access can be out to Arbor Drive at the existing light,with the return through the existing Village Hall entrance. Also, the recreation committee is seeking to create a teen/recreation center. It may be possible to create a dual purpose building or incorporate facilities the recreation committee wants into the fire house building. Obvious cost savings could be realized by constructing one larger building with more than one use, versus two separate specialized buildings. Perhaps a Village`Campus'can be created combing the fire house, recreation center, police, EMS and Village Hall all in one area. I understand the site may not be as centrally located a others, but in light of other available choices, it may be the best compromise. vgc Memo Date: 11/9/00 To: Christopher J. Bradbury From VictorG. Carosi, P.E. RE: Fire House Site UUU This AM I spoke with Dolph regarding the fire house site study. He had recently spoken with Mr. Wickert (sp?) of NYS DOT about any items or issues the state may have regarding proximity of the site to their property,the wetlands, and our access to the site. Mr. Wickert explained the past history of the site with regards to the Villages'request for its use. Dolph identified three"roadblocks" 1. The land is without rights-of-access. I understand from Dolph this to mean that the state will not permit a traffic light at the top of the Hutch exit ramps to control traffic during fire apparatus exiting. 2. Wetlands around the site and the newly built wetlands areas. The state does not want these wetlands disturbed. 3. Other sites. According to Mr.Wickert,the state has suggested before that the Village examine other lands that the state feels would be more usable such as a parcel on Ridge Street. Dolph will be incorporating this information and will follow-up with Mr. Dennison and others within the DOT to prepare a more comprehensive memo with regards to the fire house site. He expects to have a final memo to you within 1 week. His overall assessment of the project at this time is 'it looks dim.' When his memo is completed, he would like to meet with you, me, and the Mayor to discuss his findings. vgc Confidential Memo Date: 10/31/00 To: Dolph Rotfeld, P.E., DEE Cc: Christopher J. Bradbury From: Victor G. Carosi, P.E. RE: Fire house site Thank you for your memo of October 26 regarding the study of the land on the Hutch Parkway for possible use as a firehouse site. Please clarify and expand your concerns as follows: 1. Sight distance. Is it adequate for the safe egress of the apparatus and does such egress meet roadway standards and codes? 2. Can the apparatus make the turns necessary out of the driveway? Keep in mind the potential for reduced shoulder width during the winter months resulting from snow accumulation. 3. Are signals required? If so where should they be placed? 4. How can the confusion between the Hutch entrance and the firehouse driveway be mitigated? 5. Is it feasible to reconstruct the State drainage facilities? 6. Can you quantify cuts or fills required? Will retaining walls be necessary? If so,what would the height of such walls be? 7. Is it feasible to extend utilities from Oriole Place in lieu of ejector pumps? The Village really needs to know if this site will or will not work for use as a Village fire house and EMS facility. vgc Confidential Dolph Rotfeld Engineering, P.C. M E M O TO: VICTOR CAROSI. P.E. FROM: DOLPH ROTFELD, P.E., DEE SUBJECT: FIREHOUSE SITE DATE: 10.26.00 Please be advised we have visited the proposed Firehouse site off North Ridge Street adjacent to the northbound entrance ramp to the Hutchinson River Parkway. A map showing the site was furnished to us by NYSDOT. We prepared two alternative layouts using your architect's building plan and footprint. The property is adjacent to a wetland and according to conversation with representatives of the US Army Corps of Engineers no buffer limitation applies, according to their regulations. Although the conceptual layout fits the site, I have the following concerns. 1. Sight distance for apparatus leaving the site. 2. Right turns out will be difficult for the fire apparatus. 3. Two sets of traffic signals, possibly three, will be needed to stop vehicular movements along Ridge Street and at the parkway exit ramps when the equipment is responding to a fire call. 4. The proximity of the driveway to the parkway's, northbound entrance could cause confusion for drivers coming north on Ridge Street to use this ramp. 5. Some reconstruction of NYSDOT drainage facilities will be required along with substantial grading to prepare the site for the intended use. 6. Sewage will have to be pumped from the building to the public sanitary sewer. 7. Water, electric and telephone service can be connected at Ridge Street If you have any comments or questions, please call. OCT 302000 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK DEPT.OF PUBLIC WORKS Dolph Rotfeld Engineering, P.C. M E M 0 To: VICTOR CAROSI, P.E. FROM: DOLPH ROTFELD, P.F., DEE SUBJECT: FIREHOUSE DATE: 9.22.00 With regard to your 9.21.00 memo, our work scope for siting the proposed firehouse is as follows. 1. Review the two potential sites along the Hutchinson River Parkway and any other sites recommended by the Village for analysis. 2. Each site analysis will include these items. A. Roadway access and egress for the fire fighting equipment and cars. B. Required parking areas. C. Grading and drainage D. Availability of water, sewer, electricity, gas and telephone. E. General site development problems. We will need maps of any site for which you require a report. The time frame will depend to some extent on the detail of available mapping. I think two or three days for each potential site would be the quickest. The fee would be as per our contract with the Village for this type of work on an hourly basis. DR I;7�� TO/TO 39'd DN3 C-13A-L ' Hd-10C 69L9TE9bT6 LL:97 000Z/ZZ/60 Phone WHITE PLAINS, N.Y. (203) - 888-4531 (914) - 946-4850 Telefax (203) - 888-6247 SOILTESTING, INC. 140 OXFORD ROAD - OXFORD, CONN. 06478-1943 GEOTECHNICAL / ENVIRONMENTAL SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATIONS - Test Borings - Core Drilling Monitoring Wells - Recovery Wells - Direct Push/Probe Sampling October 12, 2000 Rye Brook Building - Eng. Dept. 938 King Street Rye Brook, Nei 10573 Attention: Victor Carosi Re: Upcoming Projects We would like to assist your firm by offering our services. I have enclosed a copy of our brochure for your use. If you require further information, we would be happy to forward it to you. We presently do business throughout New York, New Jersey, New England and the Pennsylvania areas, and it would be a pleasure to submit a proposal for any current or anticipated project upon which you might require our expertise. We thank you for the opportunity to introduce our firm and look forward to an opportunity to work with you. If you have any questions about our firm or the services we offer, please do not hesitate to contact us. Thanking you for your time and consideration, we remain, Very trul;' wr)urs, SOILTESTING, INC. es A. DeAngelis YJam J Engineering Geologist JAD:nw Memo Date: 11/15/00 To: Christopher J. Bradbury From: Victor G. Carosi, P.E." G RE: Fire House Chris: We are currently awaiting the final report from Dolph regarding the feasibility of placing the fire house on the Hutch property. As you know, the chances of this site working are not very good from information Dolph expressed to me. An alternate location I feel should be given careful consideration is land at Village Hall extending south to Arbor Drive. While not all of this land is currently owned by the Village, I am sure the current property owners,900 King Street, would be willing to discuss the transfer of this land to the Village for such use. 1 envision that a two level fire house, with the truck bays and sleeping quarters on grade with Village Hall, and other necessary rooms and offices on grade with Arbor Drive, can be located here. Access can be out to Arbor Drive at the existing light,with the return through the existing Village Hall entrance. Also, the recreation committee is seeking to create a teen/recreation center. It may be possible to create a dual purpose building or incorporate facilities the recreation committee wants into the fire house building. Obvious cost savings could be realized by constructing one larger building with more than one use,versus two separate specialized buildings. Perhaps a Village'Campus'can be created combing the fire house, recreation center, police, EMS and Village Hall all in one area. I understand the site may not be as centrally located a others, but in light of other available choices, it may be the best compromise. vgc Dolph Rotfeld Engineering, P.C. MEMO EP25 RhS To: VICTOR CAROSI, P.E. FROM: DOLPH ROTFELD, P.E., DEE SUBJECT: FIREHOUSE DATE: 9.22.00 With regard to your 9.21.00 memo, our work scope for siting the proposed firehouse is as follows. 1. Review the two potential sites along the Hutchinson River Parkway and any other sites recommended by the Village for analysis. 2. Each site analysis will include these items. A. Roadway access and egress for the fire fighting equipment and cars. B. Required parking areas. C. Grading and drainage D. Availability of water, sewer, electricity, gas and telephone. E. General site development problems. We will need maps of any site for which you require a report. The time frame will depend to some extent on the detail of available mapping. I think two or three days for each potential site would be the quickest. The fee would be as per our contract with the Village for this type of work on an hourly basis. DR DRAFT Rye Brook Fire House - RFP Outline I. Introduction Description of Project, Location Past Studies and Information Regarding Fire House II. Scope of Work and Responsibilities of Consultant Program and Space Needs Analysis of New Facility Site Analysis, including Description of Existing Conditions and Identification of Site Constraints and Opportunities Concept Sketch of Building, Access, Circulation, Parking (May Include Alternatives) Preliminary Cost Estimates of Facility, Site Work, etc. (If Alternatives are Requested, then Estimates Should be Provided for Each) Summary of Consultant Responsibilities, Anticipated Meetings, Product Submissions and Timeframes III. RFP Submission Requirements Statement of Qualifications Proposal Selection Criteria Deadline for Submissions Memo Date: 10/31/00 To: Dolph Rotfeld, P.E., DEE Cc: Christopher J. Bradbury From: Victor G. Carosi, P.E. RE: Fire house site Thank you for your memo of October 26 regarding the study of the land on the Hutch Parkway for possible use as a firehouse site. Please clarify and expand your concerns as follows: 1. Sight distance. Is it adequate for the safe egress of the apparatus and does such egress meet roadway standards and codes? 2. Can the apparatus make the turns necessary out of the driveway? Keep in mind the potential for reduced shoulder width during the winter months resulting from snow accumulation. 3. Are signals required? If so where should they be placed? 4. How can the confusion between the Hutch entrance and the firehouse driveway be mitigated? 5. Is it feasible to reconstruct the State drainage facilities? 6. Can you quantify cuts or fills required? Will retaining walls be necessary? If so, what would the height of such walls be? 7. Is it feasible to extend utilities from Oriole Place in lieu of ejector pumps? The Village really needs to know if this site will or will not work for use as a Village fire house and EMS facility. vgc Confidential ROBERT A. POSNER, P.E. CONSULTING ENGINEER 121 West 27th Street, Suite 905, New York, New York 10001 � � �41- (212)924-4559 L January 12, 1998 NOI.LV8ISINIM3V 30VITA Mr. Christopher J. Russo, Village Administrator Village of Rye Brook 938 King Street 9 5 I Nb'(' 1�. �i Rye Brook, New York 10573 Re: Proposed New Fire House Re-analysis of Site on West Side of North Ridge Street North of Betsy Brown Road Dear Chris : At your request, the writer was pleased to meet at your office with you and with Mr. James Ryan of John Meyer Consulting on November 11 to discuss in detail the site on North Ridge Road at Sleepy Hollow Road, which is under serious consideration for acquisition at this time for construction of a new Rye Brook Fire House. According to the prospective site development drawings made available by you and Jim Ryan, the present Owner of the land in question is prepared to sell two (2) contiguous lots from the overall Red Roof Farm subdivision which front on North Ridge Street at the aforesaid location, and make up a site 190 ' in depth, with a continuous frontage of 235 ' on North Ridge Street. The purpose of this meeting was to review the physical character- istics of this proposed site and to evaluate its adequacy to accommodate a fire house of the size and configuration set forth in a pro-forma design and site layout previously prepared for the Village in May of this year by Roger Carlson, Architect, based upon minimum site dimensions of 250 ' in width x 173 ' in depth. While the proposed site has a comparable land area, it provides less frontage and more depth. To assist in evaluating this site, Jim Ryan had prepared a proposed site layout under date of 9/9/97 which adapts Roger Carlson' s pro-forma layout by providing only an egress driveway on the South side of the building, and placing an entry drive plus all of the parking on the North side and towards the rear. As presented, this alter- nate layout would provide fewer parking spaces, but additional parking spaces could be realized by extending the paved area farther to the rear of the site, although this would entail additional excavation and a possibly higher retaining structure. Letter Report 1 /12/98 Page 2 Re: Proposed New Fire House Re-analysis of Site on West Side of North Ridge Street North of Betsy Brown Road The proposed site has a substantial upward slope from the street, increasing in elevation to approximately 14' above street level at the rear of the proposed structure, and reaching a superelevation of approximately 25 ' at the proposed rear property line at the Southerly rear corner, and approximately 20 ' at the Northerly rear corner. The pro-forma design contemplates a facility with operational offices, Day Room, and overnight facilities in a two story configuration at the front, with a single story apparatus room located transversely behind, placed in the center of the site so that the fire vehicles can enter from the street at one side of the building and exit from the other side to access the street. It had also contemplated that the site width would be sufficient to accommodate nose-in parking outboard of the drive lanes on both sides of the plot, thereby minimizing the degree to which the site behind the building must be leveled to provide this parking space. In the site layout proposed by Jim Ryan, there will be a differential elevation of approximately 20 ' between the Southwest corner of the paved area and the Southwest corner of the lot, with a 16 ' differential elevation occurring at the Northwest corner. Since the offered site provides an additional 65 ' of depth behind the originally contemplated edge of pavement at the rear, there is sufficient room to extend the parking an additional 25 ' to the rear and still create an embankment with a viable rate of slope, possibly requiring a knee wall no more than 4 ' in height along the steepest part of the rear of the site. However, the narrower width of the offered site will definitely mandate construction of at least some low retaining walls along the sides of the paved areas to deal with the steeper embankments which will rise toward the rear. As discussed during our November 12 meeting, the successful development of the proposed site requires extensive excavation and removal of the existing soil in order to create a suitable "platform" on which to site the building and the contiguous parking and driveways . According to Jim Ryan, all of the soil exploration efforts to date on the Red Roof Farm site have encountered no underlying rock or rock ledge, at test pit depths of up to 12 ' . However, deeper exploration would require borings, and none have apparently been taken on the site to date. Since a major cut of up to 20 ' or more will be required at the Southwest corner of the paved area, it has been deemed most necessary to have one or more borings taken at this location to assure that Letter Report 1 /12/98 Page 3 Re: Proposed New Fire House Re-analysis of Site on West Side of North Ridge Street North of Betsy Brown Road significant rock excavation will not adversely affect the suitability of this site . Accordingly, two borings were made in this area by Soiltesting, Inc . on 1 /5/98, which found no rock to be present down to a depth of 30 ' below the existing ground surface at the rear of the site where the deepest excavation will be required. In addition, it should be noted that ground water was encountered at a depth of approximately 20 ' at the Southerly of the two borings, which would most likely place it below the proposed new pavement grade in that area after excavation, where drainage should be relatively easy to control . A copy of the Logs and Location Plan for the two borings is enclosed for your reference. From the boring results, it would be reasonable to conclude for the purposes of site evaluation that all required site excavation will entail removal of earth only. While this still represents a significant cost for the volume of excavation which will be required, such cost would be predictable and within a reasonable range for general site development. Based upon the foregoing considerations, it can be concluded that the desired building and contiguous paved areas can be fitted into the proposed site so as to provide the intended function, and that the site work and site structures which will be required to re-shape the site to accommodate this new facility can be accomplished at a reasonable cost. Should you have any questions or desire any additional information after reviewing this report, please contact the writer accordingly. Ve rul y s, obert A. Posner P.E. Encl . RAP/rg SOILTESTING, INC. CLIENT._uU_1aC1e_of_—RLet — — SHEET 1 OF 1 140 OXFORD RD. -PRo�ecr No. J HOLE NO. B-1 OXFORD, CT 06478 G1-5040--98 _ CT(203)888.4531 PROJECT NAME BORING LOCATIONS N.Y. (914)946-4850 pr� Fitt Ha e Site as directed FOREMAN-DRILLER LOCATION FK/)P _ Ixth Ridcle Sts t - RYe dc, NY INSPECTOR CASING SAMPLER COREBAR OFFSET FcbE3rt Fosrjer — TYPE HSA SS GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS SIZE I.D. 1 3/8" DATESTARTI-5798 DATE FIN. 1-5-98 201 FT AFTER 0 HOURS SURFACE ELEV. AT HAMMER WT. 140# BIT AT-_FT AFTER HOURS HAMMER FALL 30" GROUND WATER ELEV, SAMPLE BLOWS PER 6 IN. CORING DENSITf STRATA CASING ON SAMPLER TIME OR CHANGE FIELD IDENTIFICATION OF SOIL n BLOWS (FORCE ON TUBE) PER FT CONSIST DEPTH REMARKS INCL. COLOR, LOSS OF WO PER NO TYPE PEN REC ®BOT (MIN) WASH WATER, SEAMS IN ROCK, ETC. FOOT o.a a. 12 12. 1a MOIST ELEV 1 24" 24" 2'0" i 2 mist 8" `R7E'90 C17 1ICS a 1 5 1 1 loose Lt-brn FM SAIm & SILT,lit F-C gravel 5 2 Iss 24" 24" 7'0"11 13 1 10 1 [roist SN\E:sn oJJ)les/budders fran 5'-9' 15 15 oaTe't 10 3 ss 124,, 1201, 1 12,01, 8 9 croist S3ME:sn F-C gravel 13 16 aQr�act 15 4 241, 4" 17' " 7 9 wet S*E A-stiff mpact 20 5 ss 24" 12" 22'01, 9 11 wet Cry/!xn SILT & F-M SP�,D,sr. F-C gravel a ) 25 6 ss 24" 1411 2710" 9 12 wet S*E 18 23 hard 7 ss 2411 20" 30'0" 11 14 wet S*E 30 1 119 1 24 hard 30'0" E.O.B. 35 E.O.B. 3010" 40 GROUND SURFACE TO FT. USED CASING THEN CASING TO FT HOLE NO. B-1 A - AUGER UP = UNDISTURBED PISTON T THINWALL V = VANE TEST WOR=WEIGHT OF RODS WOH-WEIGHT OF HAMMER 3 RODS C-COARSE SS=SPLIT TUBE SAMPLER H.S.A.=HOLLOW STEM AUGER M= MEDIUM PROPORTIONS USED: TRACE=0-10% LITTLE= 10-20% SOME= 20-35% AND=35-50% F=FINE jAn- 12-98 03 : 08P soiltesting 203 888 6247 P . 03 SOILTESTING, INC. CLIENT Vill lac>p Fie E�ndc ____ SHEET 1 OF 1 140 OXFORD RD. PROJECT NO. HOLE NO. B-2 OXFORD, CT 06478 Gl_509p-98 CT(203) 888-4531 -- - -- PROJECT NAME BORING LOCATIONS N.Y. (914)946-4850 PrtpcE3ec1 Fire Hasse Site _ as directed FOREMAN-DRILLER LOCATION _ E /]p North lame Street - Rye BrakLNZ YQtk INSPECTOR - - RObert Frspr CASING SAMPLER CORE BAR OFFSET TYPE HSA SS GROUND WATER OBSERVATIONS SIZEI.D. 3 3 4" 1 3/81, OATESTART 11-59_ OATEFIN.I-9=9a AT�FT AFTER- 0 HOURS HAMMER WT. 140# BIT SURFACE ELEV. AT FT AFTER HOURS HAMMER FALL 3011 GROUND WATER ELEV. SAMPLE BLOWS PER 6 IN. CORING DENSITY STRATA F CASING ON SAMPLER TIME OR CHANGE FIELD IDENTIFICATION OF SOIL a BLOWS (FORCE ON TUBEI PER FT CONSIST DEPTH REMARKS INCL. COLOR, LOSS OF p PER NO TYPE PEN REC 0 BLOT (MIN) WASH WATER, SEAMS IN HOCK, ETC. FOOT 0.6 6. 1x 12-16 MOIST ELEV 1 ss 24" 16" 2'0" dry 10.1 `I�II/CT�wMCS 4 6 loose It-bm F-M SN\D & =,lit F-C gravel 5 2 ss 24" 20" 1 7'0" 99 15 y S*E:sm F-C gravel 2 dEr 10 3 ss 24" 24" 12'0" 4 5 7 9 rroist S*E:sn oa3ales/bculders 6'-9' 03Lact 15 4 ss 1241, 24" 17'0" 4 9 dry S*E:brrVgy 11 13 cnTract 20 " 221, 22,011. 7 1 9 rroist Gy F-11 S*D,lit FM gravel,lit silt 25 6 ss 124.1 23" 27'0" 9 11 rroist S*E 16 19 anlpact 7 ss 24" 24" 301011 12 17 mist SAME 30 19 22 cimse 30'0" E.O.B. 35 E.O.B. 30'0" 40 GROUND SURFACE TO FT. USED CASING THEN CASING TO FT HOLE NO. B-2 A -AUGER UP = UNDISTURBED PISTON T THINWALL V = VANE TEST WOR-WEIGHT OF RODS WON-WEIGHT OF HAMMER&RODS C= COARSE SS-SPLIT TUBE SAMPLER H.S.A.-HOLLOW STEM AUGER M-MEDIUM PROPORTIONS USED: TRACE=0-10% LITTLE= 10-204n SOME= 20-35% AND=35-50% F=FINE � � - �� s�s �N•,y e b 1 ,.S m � I 1 � r 1 ! f IN AdL ` V �' tJ k 2 �� IL cq r tl0 ' d Lt7,Z9 888 COZ 6u L 4sa'4L �Os d60 : SO 86-31-UeC 1 • Z F W U 0FF w3� '7 N MM n e 4 E. L f� 12 G a, i I c a 4 o: 4a • hT� j9� xV J 1' k' r •tom. = - OL - -1� J (II • O Z M N I l I _ b 0 •�fi O O T k a vc ; 0T I� Oai r I! 1 Z I ID . I 1 ❑I x O �I 1 II I V N � s �a :•a r � 0 o r- •YY ' d O r } J t ©; o W � L y 4 7t ' o o f FREDERICK R CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. David J. Portman, AICP Planning/Development/Environment/Transportation Howard 1. Reynolds, PE Rye, New York and Southport, Connecticut David H. Stolman, AICP 350 Theodore Fremd Avenue Michael A. Galante Rye, New York 10580 Joanne P. Meder, AICP (914) 967-6540 MEMORANDUM BY HAND To: Mayor Salvatore M. Cresenzi and Members of the Village of Rye Brook Board of Trustees Date: November 26, 1997 Subject: Village of Rye Brook Proposed Fire Station - Positive Declaration and Draft Scope Attached for your review and circulation is a Positive Declaration and a Draft Scope of Issues to be addressed in a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) in connection with the proposed Village of Rye Brook Fire Station. We look forward to discussing this matter with you at the next meeting of the Board of Trustees. Christian K. Miller, AICP Associate/Planning Attachment cc: Christopher J. Russo, w/attachment Kenneth E. Powell, Esq., w/attachment Victor Carosi, w/attachment 500\rye7-043.ckm.crc Connecticut • (203) 255-3100 FAX • (914) 967-6615 Long Island • (516) 364-4544 SEQR State Environmental Quality Review POSITIVE DECLARATION Notice of Intent to Prepare a Draft EIS Determination of Significance Project Number: 868.008 Date: December 2, 1997 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Conservation Law. The Village of Rye Brook Board of Trustees, acting as Lead Agency and Project Sponsor, has determined that the Proposed Action described below may have a significant effect on the environment and that a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will be prepared. Name of Action: Village of Rye Brook Fire Station SEQR Status: Type I _ Unlisted X Description of Action: The proposed action involves the construction of a new Village fire station on the northeast comer of a 22.25-acre property located at the intersection of Betsy Brown Road and North Ridge Street in the Village of Rye Brook. The proposed fire station would be situated within the vicinity of the existing vacant gatekeeper's residence located on the site. The proposed action also involves associated site, drainage, roadway and landscaping improvements. The project area is approximately 1.1 acres and is generally conterminous with the boundaries of proposed lots 1 and 2 within a 40-lot proposed subdivision known as Red Roof Farms. This proposed subdivision is currently under review by the Village of Rye Brook. For the purposes of this analysis, the proposed fire station would consist of a building approximately 80 feet in width and 85 feet in depth. The front of the station would be two stories and would include day facilities on the first floor and living quarters on the second floor. The rear of the station would include a 4-bay apparatus room and would be approximately 65 feet in depth. Access to the bays would be through each side of the building. The fire station site is roughly rectangular in shape and measures 175 feet on the north, 205 feet on the south, 240 feet on the west and 240 feet along the east (i.e., street frontage along North Ridge Street). The size and configuration of the site for the fire station was based on the size of the proposed building and the additional land area required for fire apparatus to access each side of the station. Location: 200-202 North Ridge Street, Village of Rye Brook Westchester County, New York `SEQR Positive Declaration Page 2 Reasons Supporting This Determination: (See 617.7(a), (b) and (c) for requirements of this determination) The Proposed Action may have a significant adverse environmental impact on: Steep Slopes Stormwater Runoff and Drainage Air Quality Vegetation and Wildlife Visual Resources Noise and Odor Traffic Circulation Land Use Community Services (including Fire Response Time) Lead Agency: Village of Rye Brook Board of Trustees 938 King Street Rye Brook, New York 10573 For Further Information: Contact Person: Christopher J. Russo, Village Administrator Address: 938 King Street Rye Brook, New York 10573 Telephone Number: (914) 939-1121 A copy of this notice has been filed with: Mayor, Village of Rye Brook, 938 King Street, Rye Brook, New York 10573 Village of Rye Brook Board of Trustees, 938 King Street, Rye Brook, New York 10573 Village of Rye Brook Planning Board, 938 King Street, Rye Brook, New York 10573 Village of Rye Brook Facilities Committee, 938 King Street, Rye Brook, New York 10573 New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, 50 Wolf Road, Albany, New York 12233-0001 New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Region 3 Westchester County Department of Health, 19 Bradhurst Avenue, Hawthorne, New York 10532 Westchester County Department of Public Works, County Office Building, White Plains, New York 10601 Westchester County Department of Environmental Facilities, County Office Building, White Plains, New York 10601 Westchester County Department of Planning, County Office Building, White Plains, New York 10601 Westchester County Department of Transportation, County Office Building, White Plains, New York 10601 docsZ600kye7-044.ckm 11rAM7 VILLAGJE OF RYE BROOK FIRE STATION DRAFT DEIS SCOPE DRAFT SCOPE RYE BROOK FIRE STATION Proposed Fire Station Village of Rye Brook Westchester County, New York Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) Draft Scope of Issues to be Addressed Name of Project: Village of Rye Brook Fire Station Project Location: 200-202 North Ridge Street, Village of Rye Brook Westchester County, New York SEQRA Classification: Unlisted Action Lead Agency and Project Sponsor: Village of Rye Board of Trustees Village of Rye Brook 938 King Street Rye Brook, New York 10573 (914) 939-1121 Scoping Compliance: This Draft Scope was prepared by the Lead Agency as Project Sponsor in accordance with paragraphs 617.8(f)(1) through (5) of Section 617.8 SCOPING of 6 NYCRR Part 617. Following adoption of a Positive Declaration by the Lead Agency on December 2, 1997, the Draft Scope was circulated to all Involved and Interested Agencies for review and discussion purposes. Scoping Session: Monday, December 16, 1997 at PNi Village of Rye Brook 90 South Ridge Street Rye Brook, New York 10573 Scope Adoption by Lead Agency: Specific calendar date to be inserted later. VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK,NEW YORK PAGE I VILLAGE!OF RYE BROOK FIRE STATION DR.4F7 DEIS SCOPE DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTION The proposed action involves the construction of a new Village fire station on the northeast corner of a 22.25-acre property located at the intersection of Betsy Brown Road and North Ridge Street in the Village of Rye Brook. The proposed fire station would be situated within the vicinity of the existing vacant gatekeeper's residence located on the site. The proposed action also involves associated site, drainage, roadway and landscaping improvements. The project area is approximately 1.1 acres and is generally conterminous with the boundaries of proposed lots 1 and 2 within a 40-lot proposed subdivision known as Red Roof Farms. This proposed subdivision is currently under review by the Village of Rye Brook. The proposed fire station would consist of a building approximately 80 feet in width and 85 feet in depth. The front of the station would be two stories and would include day facilities on the first floor and living quarters on the second floor. The rear of the station would include a 4-bay apparatus room and would be approximately 65 feet in depth. Access to the bays would be through each side of the building. The fire station site is roughly rectangular in shape and measures 175 feet on the north, 205 feet on the south, 240 feet on the west and 240 feet along the east (i.e., street frontage along North Ridge Street). The size and configuration of the site for the fire station was based on the size of the proposed building and the additional land area required for fire apparatus to access each side of the station. This site is considered as the primary site for a fine station within the Village based on the recommendation of the Village of Rye Brook Facilities Committee which submitted its recommendation to the Board of Trustees in August. The Committee, during its over two years of deliberation selected this site out of 14 potential sites within the Village. Site selection criteria included response time, topography of the site, size of the site, economics, traffic and safety. To assist it in its decision, the Committee relied on information included in the Fire Station Location Study, prepared by Carroll Buracker& Associates, Inc. as well as other appropriate materials. POTENTIAL SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACTS Based upon a review of the Full Environmental Assessment Form, the Proposed Action may have a significant adverse environmental impact on steep slopes; stormwater runoff; air quality; vegetation and wildlife; visual resources; noise and odor; traffic and transportation; land use; community services (including fire response time); and property values. GENERAL GUIDELINES 1. "Scoping" means the process by which the Lead Agency identifies the potentially significant adverse impacts related to the Proposed Action that are to be addressed in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS), including the content and level of detail of the analysis, the range of alternatives, the mitigation measures needed and the identification of non-relevant issues. Scoping provides a Project Sponsor with VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK.NEW YORK PAGE 2 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK FIRE STATION DRAFT DEIS SCOPE guidance on matters which must be considered and provides an opportunity for early participation by Involved Agencies and the public in the review of the Proposed Action. The primary goals of scoping are to focus the EIS on potentially significant adverse impacts and to eliminate consideration of those impacts that are irrelevant or nonsignificant. 2. This DEIS will cover all items in this "Scope of Issues" document. Each impact issue (e.g., soils, surface water, traffic, etc.) can be presented in a separate subsection which includes a discussion of existing conditions, significant impacts associated with the Proposed Action, and mitigation measures designed to minimize the identified impacts. If appropriate, impact issues listed separately in this document may be combined in the DEIS, as long as all issues are addressed. 3. Narrative discussions will be accompanied by appropriate tables, charts, graphs, and figures whenever possible. If a particular subject can be most effectively described in graphic format, the narrative discussion will merely summarize and highlight the information presented graphically. All plans and maps showing the site will include, as appropriate, adjacent homes, other neighboring uses and structures, roads and water bodies within a distance of not less than 100 feet from the property line of the Proposed Action. 4. Information will be presented in a manner which can be readily understood by the public. Use of technical terminologies will be avoided. When practical, impacts will be described in terms that the lay person can readily understand. 5. All discussions of mitigation measures will consider at least those measures mentioned in this "Scope of Issues" document. Where reasonable and necessary, they will be incorporated into the Proposed Action if they are not already so included. For any mitigation measures listed in this "Scope of Issues" document that are not incorporated into the Proposed Action, the reason why the Applicant considers them unnecessary will be discussed in the DEIS. The Applicant may suggest additional mitigation measures where appropriate. When no mitigation is needed, the DEIS will so indicate. 6. The document will be written in the third person (i.e., the terms "we" and "our" will not be used). The Applicant's conclusions and opinions, if given, will be identified as those of"the Applicant." 7. Any assumptions incorporated into assessments of impact will be clearly identified. In such cases, the "worst case" scenario analysis will also be identified and discussed. 8. The entire document will be checked carefully to ensure consistency with respect to the information presented in the various sections. VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK,NEW YORK PAGE 3 'VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK FIRE STATION DRAFT DEIS SCOPE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT CONTENT I. FRONT MATERIAL A. Cover Sheet: The DEIS will be preceded by a cover sheet that identifies the following: 1. That it is a Draft Environmental Impact Statement. 2. The name or descriptive title of the Proposed Action. 3. Location: Street names, Village of Rye Brook, Westchester County, New York State. 4. The Village of Rye Brook Board of Trustees as Lead Agency and Project Sponsor for the project and the name and telephone number of the following person to be contacted for further information: Village of Rye Brook, New York, Christopher J. Russo, Village Administrator, (914) 939-1121. 5. The name and address of the primary preparer(s) of the DEIS and the name and telephone number of a contact person representing the preparer(s). 6. Date of acceptance of the DEIS [specific calendar date to be inserted later]. 7. Deadline by which comments on the DEIS are due [specific calendar date to be inserted later]. B. List of Consultants Involved With the Project: The names, addresses and project responsibilities of all consultants involved with the project will be listed. C. Table of Contents: All headings which appear in the text will be presented in the Table of Contents along with the appropriate page numbers. In addition, the Table of Contents will include a list of figures, a list of tables, a list of appendix items, and a list of additional DEIS volumes, if any. H. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A. The DEIS will include an executive summary. The executive summary will only include information found elsewhere in the main body of the DEIS and will be organized as follows: VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK.NEW YORK PAGE 4 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK FIRE STATION DRAFT DEIS SCOPE 1. Brief description of the Proposed Action. 2. List of Involved Agencies and required approvals/permits. 3. Brief listing of the anticipated impacts and proposed mitigation measures for each impact issue discussed in the DEIS. The presentation format will be simple and concise. 4. Brief description of the project alternatives considered in the DEIS. A table will be presented which assesses and compares each alternative relative to the various impact issues. III. INTRODUCTION The Introduction will provide a brief overview of the Proposed Action and a discussion of required approvals and/or permits which are necessary to accomplish the Proposed Action. Specific topics to be addressed include: A. A complete listing of the names and addresses of all Involved or Interested Agencies, Associations and/or Individuals who have review and approval authority or who have expressed an interest in reviewing the DEIS in order to provide comments thereon. Agencies which have review and approval authority will be separately identified. B. Site location with respect to regional setting within Westchester County; surrounding municipalities; and transportation facilities. C. Site location with respect to local setting within the Village of Rye Brook; general property description including acreage, tax map designations, zoning, easements, life estates, and private agreements that affect the future development and use of the property; previous and existing improvements; cultural resources (i.e., cemetery); road fi-ontage; brief descriptions of site topography, geology, drainage, wetlands, streams and ponds; the character of the surrounding area; and available utilities. D. A statement as to the need for an Environmental Impact Statement will be provided. IV. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED ACTION A. Project History: Background discussion on the property including past activities on the site, uses and development proposals. VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK,NEW YORK PAGE 5 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK FIRE STATION DRAFT DEIS SCOPE B. Statement of project purpose, need and benefit: Description of the proposed action's purpose, public need and benefit, including social and economic considerations. C. Project Description: The project description will include the following: 1. Listing of all Village, County, State, regional and Federal authorities having jurisdiction over the Proposed Action and the status of required approvals. Include list of Involved and Interested Agencies. 2. Detailed description of the proposed action including a description of the fire station operations (staffing, anticipated number of calls, etc.); proposed construction schedule and phasing; and description of construction processes. V. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSES The DEIS shall include a discussion of the existing conditions, potentially significant adverse impacts and proposed mitigation measures for the following: A. Geology 1. Existing Conditions. a. Regional and bedrock geology. b. Surface and subsurface geological formations. A plan which shows the location and extent of significant rock outcrops, areas of less than 5 feet depth to bedrock, and special geological formations (e.g., any cliffs, ledges, large boulders, pits or sinkholes) will be included for the entire site. C. Depth to and nature of any bedrock formations. d. Viability of such formations for construction. 2. Potential Impacts. a. Blasting, or other rock removal, including location (map required). b. Extent and impact of construction in areas with shallow depth to bedrock. VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK.NEW YORK PAGE 6 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK FIRE STATION DRAFT DEIS SCOPE C. Other. 3. Mitigation Measures. a. Blasting mitigation plan, if required. b. Other. B. Soils 1. Existing Conditions. a. A map of the soil types based on the Westchester County Soil and Water Conservation District soil survey for the entire site. b. Description of soil characteristics including texture, soil bearing capacity, erodibility and drainage characteristics. C. Table of soils on site showing: (1) Erosion potential, including construction-related and long-term limitations. (2) Runoff potential, including construction-related and long- term limitations. (3) Permeability. (4) Construction potential for roads, buildings with basements, parking lots and underground utilities. d. Other pertinent soil information. 2. Potential Impacts. a. Description of soil type to be impacted, and to what extent, with a grading limit line indicated on the grading plan. Indicate the amount (preliminary cut and fill analysis) and location of earthwork anticipated. b. Potential erosion based on cut and fill analysis. C. Potential sedimentation impacts on wetlands and adjacent water bodies, if applicable, VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK.NEW YORK PAGE 7 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK FIRE STATION DRAFT DEIS SCOPE d. Other. 3. Mitigation Z'Teasures. a. Description of proposed sedimentation and erosion control measures in accordance with Westchester County Best Management Practices Manual for Erosion and Sediment Control (1991). b. A grading limit line and clearing limit line and Construction Phasing Plan. C. Other. C. Slopes and Topography 1. Existing Conditions. a. General description and a graphic which shows 2-foot elevation contours for the site. b. Special topographic features, including natural basins, depressions and rock ledges or outcrops, not shown elsewhere. C. Other. 2. Potential Impacts. a. Extent and impact of construction on the following slope categories: 0-15%; 15-25% and 25+%(map required). b. Description of potential impacts to steep (15-25% and 25+%) slopes on the entire site, including but not limited to potential sedimentation impacts and the potential for slope failure (map required). 3. Mitigation Measures. a. Minimal site disturbance with respect to the removal, storage and disposal of rock and earth. VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK.NEW YORK PAGE 8 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK FIRE STATION DRAFT DEIS SCOPE b. Sedimentation and Erosion Control measures for the entire site in accordance with Westchester County Best Management Practices Manua!for Erosion and Sediment Control (1991). C. Use of retaining walls to minimize proposed grading. d. Other. D. Water Resources - Surface and Groundwater 1. Existing Conditions. a. Existing surface water bodies (including classification), drainage patterns and wetland areas on the balance of the site and within 1/4-mile of the subject site's boundaries. b. Discharge points of existing drainage. Discuss existing stromwater runoff quality (including point and non-point pollution sources) and quantity within the watershed(s) of which the subject site is a part. C. Proximity to Long Island Sound. d. Other. 2. Potential Impacts. a. Changes to existing drainage patterns. b. Changes to existing discharge points. C. Water quality impacts on wetlands, ponds and streams on site and within 1/4-mile of the subject site's boundaries, including: (1) Increased contamination from driveways and other impervious surfaces. (2) Increase nutrient loading and contamination due to the washing of fire apparatus or the use of fertilizers, pesticides, herbicides, fungicides or other chemicals. (3) Sedimentation of water bodies. VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK.NEW YORK PAGE 9 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOD FIRE STATION DRAFT DEIS SCOPE d. Stormwater runoff quantity impacts following project completion on neighboring upstream and downstream wetlands, ponds, other streams and Long Island Sound. e. Groundwater impacts, if any. f. Description of any permit requirements. g. Other. 3. Mitigation Measures. a. Erosion control measures. b. Stonn Water Management measures in accordance with the NYSDEC publication Reducing the Impacts of Stormwater Runofffrom Nei►,Developments (1992). C. For stolmwater runoff quality control measures, the following standards set by T. Schueler (1995) in Urban Watershed Management: Design of Urban Best Management Practices and the NYSDEC publication Reducing the Impacts of Stornni,ater Runoff from Neu,Developments (1992). d. Point and non-point source pollution controls. e. Maintenance plan and responsibility for stormwater control systems. f. Compliance with the NYSDEC SPDES General Permit for Stormwater Discharges and other relevant regulations. g. Other. E. Vegetation and Wildlife 1. Existing Conditions. a. Woody and herbaceous species. (1) Distribution of vegetative cover types for the entire site (map required). VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK.NEW YORK PAGE 10 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK FIRE STATION DRAFT DE1S SCOPE (2) General species abundance and value to wildlife. (3) Approximate age and sizes of woody species. b. Presence of threatened, endangered or rare plant species on or near the site based upon existing available data and recent field inspection (map required). C. Survey of location, species, health condition and size of trees on the subject site as required by Chapter 235, Trees, of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook (map required). d. Site-specific analysis of resident and migratory wildlife (including any threatened, rare, endangered or nuisance species). Assessment shall examine habitat functions, where appropriate, (i.e., breeding habitat, transitional, staging areas, feeding and roosting sites and travel lanes). e. Other. 2. Potential Impacts. a. Trees removed or disturbed by proposed construction activities. If removal is proposed, the DEIS will include detailed information regarding such removal, including identification of all trees greater than eight (8) inches in diameter at breast height (DBH) to be removed by species, size, health condition and total quantity. b. Cumulative loss of vegetation, overall and by vegetative type, upon project completion. C. Increased erosion resulting fi-om removal of vegetation. d. Loss of wildlife habitat and impact on habitat functions caused by site development including but not limited to forests, riparian areas and wetlands. e. Fertilizer and pesticide impacts. f. Other. 3. Mitigation Measures. VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK.NEW YORK PAGE 11 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOD FIRE STATION DRAFr DEIS SCOPE a. Tree preservation methods and utilization of existing cleared areas to the maximum extent practicable (map required). b. Establishment of minimal clearing and grading limit lines to depict maximum limits of areas of disturbance. C. Compliance with Chapter 235, Trees, of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook. d. Screening to reduce impacts on neighboring properties. e. Schematic landscape plan for the subject site showing proposed planting, including typical plant list. f. Phased construction and landscape plan implementation, based upon limitations placed on the amount of land that may be cleared and disturbed at any one time. g. Other. F. Traffic and Transportation 1. Existing Conditions. a. A description of the following traffic corridors, at minimum, including pavement width/conditions, number of lanes, grades, traffic volume, parking and traffic controls. (1) North Ridge Street and Betsey Brown Road. (2) North Ridge Street south of Sleepy Hollow Road. (3) King Street (NYS Route 120A), south of the Hutchinson River Parkway . (4) King Street, on the westerly side of the roadway, south of Blind Brook lvliddle/High Schools. All roadways in the immediate area of the site will be shown graphically. b. Accident history for the intersections listed above and roadway frontages along the subject site, for at least a 3-year period. (a) Location. VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK.NEW YORK PAGE 12 .VILLAGt OF RYE BROOK FIRE STATION DRAFT DEIS SCOPE (b) Date. (c) Time. (d) Type of accident. (e) Number of injuries. (f) Probable cause. (g) Road conditions. (h) Number of vehicles involved. C. Analysis of site access(es), including existing sight distance. 2. Potential Impacts. a. Estimation and distribution of site-generated traffic on area roads. Trip generation rates will represent conditions generally found for type and size of uses proposed. b. Intersection capacity analysis of future background (design year 2000) conditions based upon an annual growth factor of two percent (2%) per year applied to existing baseline volumes and including all developments planned or proposed in the immediate area of the site. C. Intersection capacity analysis of combined conditions (future background and proposed development of the site with projected site-generated traffic). d. Safety concerns regarding existing roadways — Sight distance evaluation at proposed access drive. e. Construction traffic - Volumes, types of vehicles, hours and routing. f Describe all permits required for proposed roadway improvements. g. Evaluate impacts to mass transportation. h. Other. 3. Mitigation Measures. a. Proposed improvements, including access, off-site roadway and sight distance. VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK.NEW YORK PAGE 13 VILLAGE;OF RYE BROOK FIRE STATION DRAFr DEIS SCOPE b. Other. G. Air Quality 1. Existing Conditions. a. Identification and description of air quality pollutants of concern (carbon monoxide at a minimum). b. A brief discussion of existing available air quality data will be provided for the vicinity of the proposed project site. C. Compliance with ambient air quality standards. 2. Potential Impacts. a. Indirect source emissions. b. Direct source emissions. C. Other. 3. Mitigation Measures. a. Construction activities. b. Other. H. Land Use and Zoning 1. Existing Conditions. a. Existing zoning of the site and surrounding area within 1/4-mile of the subject site's boundaries. b. Existing land uses on the site and surrounding area within 1/4- mile of the subject site's boundaries. C. Applicable land use plans and regulations for the site and within 1/4-mile of the subject site's boundaries. VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK.NEW YORK PAGE 14 -VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK FIRE STATION DRAFT DEIS SCOPE d. Recommendations of the Westchester County master plan, Patterns. e. Potential build-out, based on existing zoning, of areas within 1/4-mile of the subject site's boundaries. 2. Potential Impacts. a. Compatibility of proposed project with existing and proposed land uses. b. Other. 3. Mitigation Measures. a. Describe proposed mitigation measures to minimize potential impact to surrounding land uses. Consider cumulative impact of other development proposals that are currently planned or proposed for the area surrounding the subject site. b. Other. I. Fire Response 1. Existing Conditions. a. Size of existing force and organization of service provider(s). b. Location of existing station. C. Number and type of apparatus. d. Average response time. e. Include consideration of cumulative impacts of other developments planned or proposed in the immediate area of the subject site. 2. Potential Impacts. a. Changes in fire response time. b. Other. VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK.NEW YORK PAGE 15 -VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK FIRE STATION DRAFr DEIS SCOPE 3. Mitigation Measures. a. Modification in routing of fire responses b. Other. J. Utilities 1. Water Supply a. Existing Conditions. (1) Describe the current amount of water usage of the High Point Hospital. (2) Available capacity of public water supply, and applicable connection policies. (3) Discussion of existing water supply infrastructure and Current pressure on the subject site and within immediate service area. (4) Identify location of water- lines and related infrastructure elements serving and within the vicinity of the subject site (map required). b. Potential Impacts. (1) Estimate increase in water usage by proposed use within the development. (2) Analysis of proposed development's impacts to water pressure within the service area. (3) Discuss impacts related to construction of additional water supply infi-astructure including impacts on existing users within service area. (4) For each of the above analyses, also include consideration of cumulative impacts of other developments planned or proposed in the immediate area of the subject site. (List of developments to be supplied by Lead Agency). VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK,NEW YORK PAGE 16 'VILLAGE OF RYE BROOD FIRE STATION DRAFT DEIS SCOPE (5) Other. C. Mitigation Measures. (1) Proposed water supply infrastructure improvements. (2) Other. 2. Sanitary Sewage a. Existing Conditions. (1) Describe the current amount of sewage disposal of the High Point Hospital. (2) Available capacity of sewage disposal system, and applicable connection policies. (3) Discussion of existing sewage disposal infrastructure on the subject site and within immediate service area. (4) Identify location of sewer lines and related infrastructure elements serving and within the vicinity of the subject site (map required). b. Potential Impacts. (1) Estimate of increases in sewage disposal from the proposed development by use. (2) Discuss impacts related to construction of proposed mfi-astructure. (3) Other. C. Mitigation Measures. (1) Compliance with permit requirements of service provider. (2) Other. VILLAGE OF RYE BROOD.NEW YORK PAGE 17 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK FIRE STATION DRAFT DEIS SCOPE K. Visual and Community Character 1. Existing Conditions. a. Description of the visual and community character within a 1/4- mile of the subject site's boundaries. b. Visual relationship between the project site and the surrounding area using photographs, sight line diagrams and cross sections, as appropriate. C. Identification of significant visual features. 2. Potential Impacts. a. Changes in visual character- of the area as a result of the Proposed Action. b. Exterior lighting. C. Visual impacts to adjacent properties and roadway corridors. d. Provide architectural renderings and details, as appropriate. e. Other. 3. Mitigation Measures. a. Preservation of existing trees and proposed buffering. b. Restricted clearing limit lines. C. Landscaping, including buffer screening plans. d. Other. L. Noise 1. Existing Conditions. a. Detailed discussion of existing noise levels on the property. b. Other. VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK,NEW YORK PAGE 18 VILLAGE OF RYE,BROOK FIRE STATION DRAFr DEIS SCOPE 2. Potential Impacts. a. Impacts of noise related to operation of fire station. b. Describe noise that may be generated during construction of the proposed development and its likely duration, including consideration of on-site noise (e.g., blasting, construction equipment) and construction traffic noise on area roadways. Identify potential sources and decibel levels. C. Other. 3. Mitigation Measures. a. Proposed noise attenuation measures. b. Modifications in fire station operations to minimize impacts on adjacent properties. C. Other. M. Property Values 1. Existing Conditions. a. Discussion of existing property values based on sales data, tax assessor values or other appropriate data within the vicinity of the subject site. b. Other. 2. Potential Impacts. a. Impacts of proposed fire station on adjacent property values. b. Other. 3. Mitigation Measures. a. Modifications in fire station design or operations to minimise impacts on adjacent property values. VILLAGE OF RYE BROOD.NEW YORK PAGE 19 VILLAGE OF RYE BR(X)K FIRE STATION DRAFT DEIS SCOPE b. Provision for landscape buffer and screening. C. Other VI. ALTERNATIVES The description and evaluation of the following alternatives to the Proposed Action will address all of the topics in Sections IV and V of this document and be at a level of detail sufficient to permit a comparative assessment of the alternatives discussed and will be analyzed in terms of the impact issues listed above in summary and matrix format. Alternatives will include the following: A. No action. B. Alternative Fire Station Locations. 1. Sleepy Hollow and North Ridge Street. [Other Potential Fire Station Locations to be Inserted Later] VII. ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS THAT CANNOT BE AVOIDED IF THE PROJECT IS IMPLEMENTED Adverse environmental impacts expected to occur if the Proposed Action is implemented regardless of the mitigation measures considered. VHI. IRREVERSIBLE AND IRRETRIEVABLE CONIMIT-IENT OF RESOURCES Those natural and human resources listed in Sections IV and V that will be consumed, converted or made unavailable for future use if the Proposed Action is implemented. IX. GROWTH INDUCING IMPACTS A. Future growth potential. B. Impact upon local roadways, and future commercial and residential development. C. Other. X. EFFECTS ON THE USE AND CONSERVATION OF ENERGY RESOURCES VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK,NEW YORK PAGE 20 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOM FIRE STATION DRAFT DEIS SCOPE A. The energy sources to be used if the Proposed Action is implemented. B. Increased energy consumption. C. Energy conservation measures. XI. SOURCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY XH. APPENDICES A. All SEQRA documentation, including a copy of the Environmental Assessment Form (EAF), the Positive Declaration and the DEIS Scope. B. Copies of all official correspondence related to issues discussed in the DEIS. C. Copies of all technical studies, in their entirety. docs2\100\iye7-002.kbo 11.26-97 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK.NEW YORK PAGE 21 90 .-���� DEC 5 � f 1 o I VILLAGE OF RYE DROM 938 King Street, Rye Brmk, N.Y. 10573 (914) 939-1121 Fax (914) 939-0242 MAYOR Salvatore M. Cresenzi TRUSTEES Joseph Pellino Eugene R. Strum Nancy Stein Tunis December 4, 1997 Gary Zuckerman ADMINISTRATOR Christopher J. Russo Commissioner Harold N. Adel, M.D. Westchester County Health Department 19 Bradhurst Avenue Hawthorne, NY 10532 Re: Notification of Lead Agency Designation, Positive Declaration and Public Scoping Session Pursuant to Part 617 of Title 6 NYCRR in connection with the Village of Rye Brook's Fire House Project in Rye Brook, New York. Dear Commissioner Adel: The Village of Rye Brook Board of Trustees acting in its capacity as Lead Agency adopted the enclosed Resolution and Positive Declaration with respect at the above captioned matter at its December 2, 1997 Meeting pursuant to the requirements of the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA). 1 The proposed action involves the site selection and construction of a new Rye Brook Village fire station. The location under consideration is on the northeast corner of a 22.25-acre property located at the intersection of Betsy Brown Road and North Ridge Street in the Village of Rye Brook. The Project area is approximately 1.1 acres. A Public Scoping Session will be held on Tuesday, December 16, 1997, at 8 p.m. in Rye Brook Village Hall, 938 King Street, Rye Brook, New York, 10573. The deadline for submission of written comments is December 31, 1997 Also enclosed for your review and comment is the draft scope prepared pursuant to the requirements of the SEQRA regulations. December 4, 1997 Re: Rye Brook Municipal Firehouse Page Two Please contact this office at (914) 939-1121 with questions about this matter. Very truly yours, Christopher J. Russo Village Administrator/Clerk CJR/CKM/RC S Enclosures cc: Westchester County Department of Transportation Commissioner Joseph Petrocelli Westchester County Department of Planning Commissioner P. Lynn Oliva Westchester County Dept. of Env. Facilities Commissioner Anthony Trelewicz, P.E. NY State Dept. of Environmental Conservation Region 3 Director Marc Moran Rye Brook Planning Board Rye Brook Facilities Committee Superintendent, Blind Brook Union Free School District Superintendent, Port Chester Union Free School District BR(�vk 1902 VILLAGE OF RYE DRCDK 938 King Street, Rye Brmk, N.Y. 10573 (914) 939-1121 Fax (914) 939-0242 MAYOR Salvatore M. Cresenzi TRUSTEES Joseph Pellino Eugene R. Strum Nancy Stein Tunis December 4, 1997 Gary Zuckerman ADMINISTRATOR Christopher J. Russo Commissioner Anthony Landi, P.E. Westchester County Department of Public Works 148 Martine Avenue Michaelian Office Building, 5`h Floor White Plains, New York 10601 Re: Notification of Lead Agency Designation, Positive Declaration and Public Scoping Session Pursuant to Part 617 of Title 6 NYCRR in connection with the Village of Rye Brook's Fire House Project in Rye Brook, New York. Dear Commissioner Landi: The Village of Rye Brook Board of Trustees acting in its capacity as Lead Agency adopted the enclosed Resolution and Positive Declaration with respect at the above captioned matter at its December 2, 1997 Meeting pursuant to the requirements of the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA). The proposed action involves the site selection and construction of a new Rye Brook Village fire station. The location under consideration is on the northeast corner of a 22.25-acre property located at the intersection of Betsy Brown Road and North Ridge Street in the Village of Rye Brook. The Project area is approximately 1.1 acres. A Public Scoping Session will be held on Tuesday, December 16, 1997, at 8 p.m. in Rye Brook Village Hall, 938 King Street, Rye Brook, New York, 10573. The deadline for submission of written comments is December 31, 1997 Also enclosed for your review and comment is the dmll s--jpe prepared pursuant to the requirements of the SEQRA regulations. December 4, 1997 Re: Rye Brook Municipal Firehouse Page Two Please contact this office at (914) 939-1121 with questions about this matter. Very truly yours, Christopher J. Russo Village Administrator/Clerk CJR/CKM/RCS Enclosures cc: Westchester County Department of Transportation Commissioner Joseph Petrocelli Westchester County Department of Planning Commissioner P. Lynn Oliva Westchester County Dept. of Env. Facilities Commissioner Anthony Trelewicz, P.E. NY State Dept. of Environmental Conservation Region 3 Director Marc Moran Rye Brook Planning Board Rye Brook Facilities Committee Superintendent, Blind Brook Union Free School District Superintendent, Port Chester Union Free School District December 2, 1997 On the motion of Trustee Pellino, seconded by Trustee Tunis, the following resolution was adopted: RESOLUTION LEAD AGENCY DESIGNATION, POSITIVE DECLARATION, CIRCULATION OF SCOPE OF DEIS, AND SCHEDULING PUBLIC SCOPI NG SESSION RYE BROOK FIRE HOUSE - � - WHEREAS, the Village of Rye Brook Board of Trustees is reviewing the issue of siting a firehouse in the Village of Rye Brook; and WHEREAS, on October 31, 1997, the Rye Brook Village Administrator/Clerk circulated to all involved agencies a notice stating the intent of the Village Board of Trustees to act as Lead Agency with respect to this matter. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law (State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA)), the Rye Brook Board of Trustees hereby declares itself Lead Agency for the proposed action, no objections having been received within thirty(30) days of the circulation of the Boards' notice of intent to be Lead Agency; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Village of Rye Brook Board of Trustees hereby adopts the accompanying positive declaration under SEQRA, which the Village Administrator/Clerk shall circulate and cause to be published as required by law; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Rye Brook Board of Trustees hereby directs the Village Administrator/Clerk to circulate the Positive Declaration and Draft Scope of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) to all involved and interested agencies with a notice that a public scoping session will be held at 8:00 p.m., at the Rye Brook Village i Hall at 938 King Street, Rye Brook, New York, on Tuesday, December 16, 1997, and that the final date for written comments on the Draft Scope is December 31, 1997. i i Trustee Strum VOTING AYE Trustee Tunis VOTING AYE f Trustee Zuckerman VOTING AYE Trustee Pellino VOTING AYE Mayor Cresenzi VOTING AYE §tatr of ?drw Uork fLtountg of Mrstr4rstrr s3.: 'Pillagr of ?3ur grook i I hereby certify that this is the Resolution adopted by the Board of Trustees of the Village of i Rye Brook which was duly passed by said Board on Tuesday December 2nd 19 97 i IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the Seal of the Village Ij of Rye Brook, this 3rd day of December 1997 i Village Clerk SEQR State Environmental Quality Review POSITIVE DECLARATION Notice of Intent to Prepare a Draft EIS Determination of Significance Project Number: 868.008 Date: December 2, 1997 This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing regulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Conservation Law. The Village of Rye Brook Board of Trustees, acting as Lead Agency and Project Sponsor, has determined that the Proposed Action described below may have a significant effect on the environment and that a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will be prepared. Name of Action: Village of Rye Brook Fire Station SEQR Status: Type I _ Unlisted X Description of Action: The proposed action involves the construction of a new Village fire station on the northeast comer of a 22.25-acre property located at the intersection of Betsy Brown Road and North Ridge Street in the Village of Rye Brook. The proposed fire station would be situated within the vicinity of the existing vacant gatekeeper's residence located on the site. The proposed action also involves associated site, drainage, roadway and landscaping improvements. The project area is approximately 1.1 acres and is generally conterminous with the boundaries of proposed lots 1 and 2 within a 40-lot proposed subdivision known as Red Roof Farms. This proposed subdivision is currently under review by the Village of Rye Brook. For the purposes of this analysis, the proposed fire station would consist of a building approximately 80 feet in width and 85 feet in depth. The front of the station would be two stories and would include day facilities on the first floor and living quarters on the second floor. The rear of the station would include a 4-bay apparatus room and would be approximately 65 feet in depth. Access to the bays would be through each side of the building. The fire station site is roughly rectangular in shape and measures 175 feet on the north, 205 feet on the south, 240 feet on the west and 240 feet along the east (i.e., street frontage along North Ridge Street). The size and configuration of the site for the fire station was based on the size of the proposed building and the additional land area required for fire apparatus to access each side of the station. Location: 200-202 North Ridge Street, Village of Rye Brook Westchester County, New York SEQR,Positive Declaration Page 2 Reasons Supporting This Determination: i (See 617.7(a), (b) and (c) for requirements of this determination) The Proposed Action may have a significant adverse environmental impact on: Steep Slopes Stormwater Runoff and Drainage Air Quality Vegetation and Wildlife Visual Resources Noise and Odor Traffic Circulation Land Use Community Services (including Fire Response Time) Lead Agency: Village of Rye Brook Board of Trustees 938 King Street Rye Brook, New York 10573 I For Further Information: Contact Person: Christopher J. Russo, Village Administrator Address: 938 King Street Rye Brook, New York 10573 Telephone Number: (914) 939-1121 A copy of this notice has been filed with: Mayor, Village of Rye Brook, 938 King Street, Rye Brook, New York 10573 Village of Rye Brook Board of Trustees, 938 King Street, Rye Brook, New York 10573 Village of Rye Brook Planning Board, 938 King Street, Rye Brook, New York 10573 Village of Rye Brook Facilities Committee, 938 King Street, Rye Brook, New York 10573 New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, 50 Wolf Road, Albany, New York 12233-0001 New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Region 3 Westchester County Department of Health, 19 Bradhurst Avenue, Hawthorne, New York 10532 Westchester County Department of Public Works, County Office Building, White Plains, New York 10601 Westchester County Department of Environmental Facilities, County Office Building, White Plains, New York 10601 Westchester County Department of Planning, County Office Building, White Plains, New York 10601 Westchester County Department of Transportation, County Office Building, White Plains, New York 10601 dots 2%5Wrye 7-044.c k m t t nG/97 NILLAGc OF RYE BROOK FIRE STATION DRAFT DEIS SCOPE DRAFT SCOPE RYE BROOK FIRE STATION Proposed Fire Station Village of Rye Brook Westchester County, New York Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) Draft Scope of Issues to be Addressed Name of Project: Village of Rye Brook Fine Station Project Location: 200-202 North Ridge Street, Village of Rye Brook Westchester County, New York SEQRA Classification: Unlisted Action Lead Agency and Project Sponsor: Village of Rye Board of Trustees Village of Rye Brook 938 King Street Rye Brook, New York 10573 (914) 939-1121 Scoping Compliance: This Draft Scope was prepared by the Lead Agency as Project Sponsor in accordance with paragraphs 617.8(f)(1) through (5) of Section 617.8 SCOPING of 6 NYCRR Part 617. Following adoption of a Positive Declaration by the Lead Agency on December 2, 1997, the Draft Scope was circulated to all Involved and Interested Agencies for review and discussion purposes. Scoping Session: Monday, December 16, 1997 at PM Village of Rye Brook 90 South Ridge Street Rye Brook, New York 10573 Scope Adoption by Lead Agency: Specific calendar date to be inserted later. VILLAGE OF RYE BROOD.NEW YORK PAGE I VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK FIRE STATION DRA.F7 DEIS SCOPE DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTION The proposed action involves the construction of a new Village fire station on the northeast comer of a 22.25-acre property located at the intersection of Betsy Brown Road and North Ridge Street in the Village of Rye Brook. The proposed fire station would be situated within the vicinity of the existing, vacant gatekeeper's residence located on the site. The proposed action also involves associated site, drainage, roadway and landscaping improvements. The project area is approximately 1.1 acres and is generally conterminous with the boundaries of proposed lots 1 and 2 within a 40-lot proposed subdivision known as Red Roof Farms. This proposed subdivision is currently under review by the Village of Rye Brook. The proposed fire station would consist of a building approximately 80 feet in width and 85 feet in depth. The front of the station would be two stories and would include day facilities on the first floor and living quarters on the second floor. The rear of the station would include a 4-bay apparatus room and would be approximately 65 feet in depth. Access to the bays would be through each side of the building. The fire station site is roughly rectangular in shape and measures 175 feet on the north, 205 feet on the south, 240 feet on the west and 240 feet along the east (i.e., street frontage along North Ridge Street). The size and configuration of the site for the fire station was based on the size of the proposed building, and the additional land area required for fire apparatus to access each side of the station. This site is considered as the primary site for a fire station within the Village based on the recommendation of the Village of Rye Brook Facilities Committee which submitted its recommendation to the Board of Trustees in August. The Committee, during its over two years of deliberation selected this site out of 14 potential sites within the Village. Site selection criteria included response time, topography of the site, size of the site, economics, traffic and safety. To assist it in its decision, the Committee relied on information included in the Fire Station Location Study, prepared by Carroll Buracker& Associates, Inc. as well as other appropriate materials. POTENTIAL SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACTS Based upon a review of the Full Environmental Assessment Form, the Proposed Action may have a significant adverse emuonmental impact on steep slopes; stormwater runoff, air quality; vegetation and wildlife; visual resources; noise and odor; traffic and transportation; land use; community services (including, fire response time); and property values. GENERAL GUIDELINES 1. "Scoping" means the process by which the Lead Agency identifies the potentially significant adverse impacts related to the Proposed Action that are to be addressed in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS), including the content and level of detail of the analysis, the range of alternatives, the mitigation measures needed and the identification of non-relevant issues. Scoping provides a Project Sponsor with VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK.NEW YORR PAGE 2 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK FIRE STATION DRAFT DEIS SCOPE guidance on matters which must be considered and provides an opportunity for early participation by Involved Agencies and the public in the review of the Proposed Action. The primary goals of scoping are to focus the EIS on potentially significant adverse impacts and to eliminate consideration of those impacts that are irrelevant or nonsignificant. 2. This DEIS will cover all items in this "Scope of Issues" document. Each impact issue (e.g., soils, surface water, traffic, etc.) can be presented in a separate subsection which includes a discussion of existing conditions, significant impacts associated with the Proposed Action, and mitigation measures designed to minimize the identified impacts. If appropriate, impact issues listed separately in this document may be combined in the DEIS, as Iona as all issues are addressed. I Narrative discussions will be accompanied by appropriate tables, charts, graphs, and figures whenever possible. If a particular subject can be most effectively described in graphic format, the narrative discussion will merely summarize and highlight the information presented graphically. All plans and maps showing the site will include, as appropriate, adjacent homes, other neighboring uses and structures, roads and water bodies within a distance of not less than 100 feet from the property line of the Proposed Action. 4. Information will be presented in a manner which can be readily understood by the public. Use of technical terminologies will be avoided. When practical, impacts will be described in tetras that the lay person can readily understand. 5. All discussions of mitigation measures will consider at least those measures mentioned in this "Scope of Issues" document. Where reasonable and necessary, they will be incorporated into the Proposed Action if they are not already so included. For any mitigation measures listed in this "Scope of Issues" document that are not incorporated into the Proposed Action, the reason why the Applicant considers them unnecessary will be discussed in the DEIS. The Applicant may suggest additional mitigation measures where appropriate. When no mitigation is needed, the DEIS will so indicate. 6. The document will be written in the thud person (i.e., the terms "we" and "our" will not be used). The Applicant's conclusions and opinions, if given, will be identified as those of"the Applicant." 7. Any assumptions incorporated into assessments of impact will be clearly identified. In such cases, the "worst case" scenario analysis will also be identified and discussed. 8. The entire document will be checked carefully to ensure consistency with respect to the information presented in the various sections. VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK.NEW YORK PAGE 3 VILLArE OF RYE BROOK FIRE STATION DRAFT DEIS SCOPE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT CONTENT I. FRONT iMATERIAL A. Cover Sheet: The DEIS will be preceded by a ..cover sheet that identifies the following: 1. That it is a Draft Environmental Impact Statement. 2. The name or descriptive title of the Proposed Action. 3. Location: Street names, Village of Rye Brook, Westchester County, New York State. 4. The Village of Rye Brook Board of Trustees as Lead Agency and Project Sponsor for the project and the name and telephone number of the following person to be contacted for further information: Village of Rye Brook, New York, Christopher J. Russo, Village Administrator, (914) 939-1121. S. The name and address of the primary preparer(s) of the DEIS and the name and telephone number of a contact person representing the preparer(s). 6. Date of acceptance of the DEIS [specific calendar date to be inserted later]. 7. Deadline by which comments on the DEIS are due [specific calendar date to be inserted later]. B. List of Consultants Involved With the Project: The names, addresses and project responsibilities of all consultants involved with the project will be listed. C. Table of Contents: All headings which appear in the text will be presented in the Table of Contents along with the appropriate page numbers. In addition, the Table of Contents will include a list of figures, a list of tables, a list of appendix items, and a list of additional DEIS volumes, if any. II. EXECUTIVE SUINIMARY A. The DEIS will include an executive summary. The executive summary will only include information found elsewhere in the main body of the DEIS and will be organized as follows: ViLL4GE OF RYE BROOK,NEW YORK PAGE 4 VILLAI E OF RYE BROOK FIRE STATION DRAFT DEIS SCOPE 1. Brief description of the Proposed Action. 2. List of Involved Agencies and required approvals/permits. 3. Brief listing of the anticipated impacts and proposed mitigation measures for each impact issue discussed in the DEIS. y The presentation format will be simple and concise. 4. Brief description of the project alternatives considered in the DEIS. A table will be presented which assesses and compares each alternative relative to the various impact issues. III. INTRODUCTION The Introduction will provide a brief overview of the Proposed Action and a discussion of required approvals and/or permits which are necessary to accomplish the Proposed Action. Specific topics to be addressed include: A. A complete listing of the names and addresses of all Involved or Interested Agencies, Associations and/or Individuals who have review and approval authority or who have expressed an interest in reviewing the DEIS in order to provide comments thereon. Agencies which have review and approval authority will be separately identified. B. Site location with respect to regional setting within Westchester County; surrounding municipalities; and transportation facilities. C. Site location with respect to local setting within the Village of Rye Brook; general property description including acreage, tax map designations, zoning, easements, life estates, and private agreements that affect the future development and use of the property; previous and existing improvements; cultural resources (i.e., cemetery); road fi-ontage; brief descriptions of site topography, geology, drainage, wetlands, streams and ponds; the character of the surrounding area; and available utilities. D. A statement as to the need for an Environmental Impact Statement will be provided. IV. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED ACTION A. Project History: Background discussion on the property including past activities on the site, uses and development proposals. VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK,NEW YORK PAGE 5 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK FIRE STATION DRAFT DEIS SCOPE B. Statement of project purpose, need and benefit: Description of the proposed action's purpose, public need and benefit, including social and economic considerations. C. Project Description: The project description will include the following: 1. Listing of all Village, County, State, regional and Federal authorities having jurisdiction over the Proposed Action and the status of required approvals. Include list of Involved and Interested Agencies. 2. Detailed description of the proposed action including a description of the fire station operations (staffing, anticipated number of calls, etc.); proposed construction schedule and phasing; and description of construction processes. V. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSES The DEIS shall include a discussion of the existing conditions, potentially significant adverse impacts and proposed mitigation measures for the following: A. Geology 1. Existing Conditions. a. Regional and bedrock geology. b. Surface and subsurface geological formations. A plan which shows the location and extent of significant rock outcrops, areas of less than 5 feet depth to bedrock, and special geological formations (e.g., any cliffs, ledges, large boulders, pits or sinkholes) will be included for the entire site. C. Depth to and nature of any bedrock formations. d. Viability of such formations for construction. 2. Potential Impacts. a. Blasting, or other rock removal, including location (map required). b. Extent and impact of construction in areas with shallow depth to bedrock. VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK,NEW YORK PAGE 6 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOD FIRE STATION DRAFT DEIS SCOPE C. Other. 3. Mitigation N-leasures. a. Blasting mitigation plan, if required. b. Other. B. Soils 1. Existing Conditions. a. A map of the soil types based on the Westchester County Soil and Water Conservation District soil survey for the entire site. b. Description of soil characteristics includinL, texture, soil bearing capacity, erodibility and drainage characteristics. C. Table of soils on site showing: (1) Erosion potential, including construction-related and long-term limitations. (2) Runoff potential, including construction-related and long- term limitations. (3) Permeability. (4) Construction potential for roads, buildings with basements, parking lots and underground utilities. d. Other pertinent soil information. 2. Potential Impacts. a. Description of soil type to be impacted, and to what extent, with a grading limit line indicated on the grading plan. Indicate the amount (preliminary cut and fill analysis) and location of earthwork anticipated. b. Potential erosion based on cut and fill analysis. C. Potential sedimentation impacts on wetlands and adjacent water bodies, if applicable. VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK.NEW YORK PAGE 7 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK FIRE STATION DRAFT DEIS SCOPE d. Other. 3. Mitigation Measures. a. Description of proposed sedimentation and erosion control measures in accordance with Westchester County Best Management Practices Marital for Erosion and Sediment Control (1991). b. A grading limit line and clearing limit line and Construction Phasing Plan. C. Other. C. Slopes and Topography 1. Existing Conditions. a. General description and a graphic which shows 2-foot elevation contours for the site. b. Special topographic features, including natural basins, depressions and rock ledges or outcrops, not shown elsewhere. C. Other. 2. Potential Impacts. a. Extent and impact of construction on the following slope categories: 0-15%; 15-25% and 25+% (map required). b. Description of potential impacts to steep (15-25% and 25=-%) slopes on the entire site, including but not limited to potential sedimentation impacts and the potential for slope failure (map required). 3. Mitigation Measures. a. Minimal site disturbance with respect to the removal, storage and disposal of rock and earth. VILLAGE OF RYE BROOD.NEW YORK PAGE 8 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOD FIRE STATION DRAFT DEIS SCOPE b. Sedimentation and Erosion Control measures for the entire site in accordance with Westchester Countv Best Management Practices Manual for Erosion and Sediment Control (1991). C. Use of retaining walls to minimize.proposed grading. d. Other. D. Water Resources - Surface and Groundwater 1. Existing Conditions. a. Existing surface water bodies (including classification), drainage patterns and wetland areas on the balance of the site and within 1/4-mile of the subject site's boundaries. b. Discharge points of existing drainage. Discuss existing stromwater runoff quality (including point and non-point pollution sources) and quantity within the Nvatershed(s) of which the subject site is a part. C. Proximity to Long Island Sound. d. Other. 2. Potential Impacts. a. Changes to existing drainage patterns. b. Changes to existing discharge points. C. Water quality impacts on wetlands, ponds and streams on site and within 1/4-mile of the subject site's boundaries, including: (1) Increased contamination from driveways and other impervious surfaces. (2) Increase nutrient loading and contamination due to the washing of fire apparatus or the use of fertilizers, pesticides, herbicides, fungicides or other chemicals. (3) Sedimentation of water bodies. VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK,NEW YORK PAGE 9 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK FIRE STATION DRAFT DEIS SCOPE d. Stormwater runoff quantity impacts following project completion on neighboring upstream and downstream wetlands, ponds, other streams and Long Island Sound. e. Groundwater impacts, if any. f. Description of any permit requirements. g. Other. 3. Mitigation N'leasures. a. Erosion control measures. b. Storm Water Management measures in accordance with the NYSDEC publication Reducing the Impacts of Storrmvater Rtmofffrom Neil,Dei elopments (1992). C. For stormwater runoff quality control measures, the following standards set by T. Schueler (1995) in Urban Watershed Management: Design of Urban Best Management Practices and the NYSDEC publication Reducing the Impacts of Stormihater Runoff f om Nei 1,Developments (1992). d. Point and non-point source pollution controls. e. Maintenance plan and responsibility for stoimwater control systems. f. Compliance with the NYSDEC SPDES General Permit for Stormwater Discharges and other relevant regulations. g. Other. E. Vegetation and Wildlife 1. Existing Conditions. a. Woody and herbaceous species. (1) Distribution of vegetative cover types for the entire site (map required). VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK.NEW YORK PAGE 10 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK FIRE STATION DRAFr DEIS SCOPE (2) General species abundance and value to wildlife. (3) Approximate age and sizes of woody species. b. Presence of threatened, endangered or rare plant species on or near the site based upon existing available data and recent field inspection (map required). C. Survey of location, species, health condition and size of trees on the subject site as required by Chapter 235, Trees, of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook (map required). d. Site-specific analysis of resident and migratory wildlife (including any threatened, rare, endangered or nuisance species). Assessment shall examine habitat functions, where appropriate, (i.e., breeding habitat, transitional, staging areas, feeding and roosting sites and travel lanes). e. Other. 2. Potential Impacts. a. Trees removed or disturbed by proposed construction activities. If removal is proposed, the DEIS will include detailed information rewarding such removal, including identification of all trees greater than eight (8) inches in diameter at breast heiaht (DBH) to be removed by species, size, health condition and total quantity. b. Cumulative loss of vegetation, overall and by vegetative type, upon project completion. C. Increased erosion resultina from removal of vegetation. d. Loss of wildlife habitat and impact on habitat functions caused by site development including but not limited to forests, riparian areas and wetlands. e. Fertilizer- and pesticide impacts. f. Other. 3. Mitigation Measures. VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK.NEW YORE: PAGE I I VILLAGE OF RYE BROOD FIRE STATION DRAFT DEIS SCOPE a. Tree preservation methods and utilization of existing cleared areas to the maximum extent practicable (map required). b. Establishment of minimal clearing and grading limit lines to depict maximum limits of areas of disturbance. C. Compliance with Chapter 235, Trees, of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook. d. Screening to reduce impacts on neighboring properties. e. Schematic landscape plan for the subject site showing proposed planting, including typical plant list. f. Phased construction and landscape plan implementation, based upon limitations placed on the amount of land that may be cleared and disturbed at any one time. g. Other. F. Traffic and Transportation 1. Existing Conditions. a. A description of the following traffic corridors, at minimum, including pavement width/conditions, number of lanes, grades, traffic volume, parking and traffic controls. (1) North Ridge Street and Betsey Brown Road. (2) North Ridge Street south of Sleepy Hollow Road. (3) King Street (NYS Route 120A), south of the Hutchinson River-Parkway . (4) King Street, on the westerly side of the roadway, south of Blind Brook Middle/High Schools. All roadways in the immediate area of the site will be shown graphically. b. Accident history for the intersections listed above and roadway frontages along the subject site, for at least a 3-year period. (a) Location. VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK.NEW YORE: PAGE 12 VILLAO.E OF RYE BROOK FIRE STATION DRAFT DEIS SCOPE (b) Date. (c) Time. (d) Type of accident. (e) Number of injuries. (f) Probable cause. (g) Road conditions. (h) Number of vehicles involved. C. Analysis of site access(es), including existing sight distance. 2. Potential Impacts. a. Estimation and distribution of site-generated traffic on area roads. Trip generation rates will represent conditions generally found for type and size of uses proposed. b. Intersection capacity analysis of future background (design year 2000) conditions based upon an annual growth factor of two percent (2%) per year applied to existing baseline volumes and including all developments planned yor proposed in the immediate area of the site. C. Intersection capacity analysis of combined conditions (future background and proposed development of the site with projected site-generated traffic). d. Safety concerns regarding existing roadways — Sight distance evaluation at proposed access drive. e. Construction traffic - Volumes, types of vehicles, hours and routing. f. Describe all permits required for proposed roadway improvements. g. Evaluate impacts to mass transportation. h. Other. 3. Mitigation Measures. a. Proposed improvements, including access, off-site roadway and sight distance. VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK.NEW YORK PAGE 13 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK FIRE STATION DRAFT DEIS SCOPE b. Other. G. Air Quality 1. Existing Conditions. a. Identification and description of air quality pollutants of concern (carbon monoxide at a minimum). b. A brief discussion of existing available air quality data will be provided for the vicinity of the proposed project site. C. Compliance with ambient air quality standards. 2. Potential Impacts. a. Indirect source emissions. b. Direct source emissions. C. Other. 3. Mitigation Measures. a. Construction activities. b. Other. H. Land Use and Zoning 1. Existing Conditions. a. Existing zoning of the site and surrounding area within 1/4-mile of the subject site's boundaries. b. Existing land uses on the site and surrounding area within 1/4- mile of the subject site's boundaries. C. Applicable land use plans and regulations for the site and within 1/4-mile of the subject site's boundaries. VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK.NEW YORK PAGE 14 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK FIRE STATION DRAFT DEIIS SCOPE d. Recommendations of the Westchester County master plan, Patterns. e. Potential build-out, based on existing zoning, of areas within 1/4-mile of the subject site's boundaries. 2. Potential Impacts. a. Compatibility of proposed project with existing and proposed land uses. b. Other. 3. Mitigation pleasures. a. Describe proposed mitigation measures to minimize potential impact to surrounding land uses. Consider cumulative impact of other development proposals that are currently planned or proposed for the area surrounding the subject site. b. Other. I. Fire Response 1. Existing Conditions. a. Size of existing force and organization of service provider(s). b. Location of existing station. C. Number and type of apparatus. d. Average response time. e. Include consideration of cumulative impacts of other developments planned or proposed in the immediate area of the subject site. 2. Potential Impacts. a. Chances in fire response time. b. Other. VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK,NEW YORK PAGE 15 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK FIRE STATION DRAFT DEIS SCOPE 3. Mitigation Measures. a. Modificafion in routing of fire responses b. Other. J. Utilities 1. Water Supply a. Existing Conditions. (1) Describe the current amount of water usage of the High Point Hospital. (2) Available capacity of public water supply, and applicable connection policies. (3) Discussion of existing water supply infrastructure and current pressure on the subject site and within immediate service area. (4) Identify location of water lines and related infrastructure elements serving and within the vicinity of the subject site (map required). b. Potential Impacts. (1) Estimate increase in water usage by proposed use within the development. (2) Analysis of proposed development's impacts to water pressure within the service area. (3) Discuss impacts related to construction of additional water supply infi-astructure including impacts on existing users within service area. (4) For each of the above analyses, also include consideration of cumulative impacts of other developments planned or proposed in the immediate area of the subject site. (List of developments to be supplied by Lead Agency). VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK,NEW YORK PAGE 16 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOD FIRE STATION DRAFr DEIS SCOPE (5) Other. C. Mitigation Measures. (1) Proposed water supply infrastructure improvements. (2) Other. 2. Sanitary Sewage a. Existing Conditions. (1) Describe the current amount of sewage disposal of the High Point Hospital. (2) Available capacity of sewage disposal system, and applicable connection policies. (3) Discussion of existing sewage disposal infrastructure on the subject site and within immediate service area. (4) Identify location of sewer lines and related infrastructure elements serving and within the vicinity of the subject site (map requu*ed).� b. Potential Impacts. (1) Estimate of increases in sewage disposal from the proposed development by use. (2) Discuss impacts related to construction of proposed infrastructure. (3) Other. C. Mitigation Measures. (1) Compliance with permit requirements of service provider. (2) Other. VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK,NEW YORK PAGE 17 VILLAGE,OF RYE BROOK FIRE STATION DRAFT DEIS SCOPE , K Visual and Community Character 1. Existing Conditions. a. Description of the visual and community character within a 1/4- mile of the subject site's boundaries. b. Visual relationship between the project site and the surrounding area using photographs, sight line diagrams and cross sections, as appropriate. C. Identification of significant visual features. 2. Potential Impacts. a. Changes in visual character of the area as a result of the Proposed Action. b. Exterior lighting. C. Visual impacts to adjacent properties and roadway corridors. d. Provide architectural renderings and details, as appropriate. e. Other. 3. Mitigation Measures. a. Preservation of existing trees and proposed buffering. b. Restricted clearing limit lines. C. Landscaping, including buffer screening plans. d. Other. L. Noise 1. Existing Conditions. a. Detailed discussion of existing noise levels on the property. b. Other. VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK.NEW YORK PAGE 18 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK FIRE STATION DR.*7 DEIS SCOPE 2. Potential Impacts. a. Impacts of noise related to operation of fire station. b. Describe noise that may be generated during construction of the proposed development and its likely duration, including consideration of on-site noise (e.g., blasting, construction equipment) and construction traffic noise on area roadways. Identify potential sources and decibel levels. C. Other. 3. Mitigation Measures. a. Proposed noise attenuation measures. b. Modifications in fire station operations to minimize impacts on adjacent properties. C. Other. M. Property Values 1. Existing Conditions. a. Discussion of existing property values based on sales data, tax assessor values or other appropriate data widdri the vicinity of the subject site. b. Other. 2. Potential Impacts. a. Impacts of proposed fire station on adjacent property values. b. Other. 3. Mitigation :Measures. a. Modifications in fire station design or operations to minimize impacts on adjacent property values. VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK,NEW YORK PAGE 19 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK FIRE STATION DRAF i DEIS SCOPE b. Provision for landscape buffer and screening. C. Other VI. ALTERNATIVES The description and evaluation of the following alternatives to the Proposed Action will address all of the topics in Sections IV and V of this document and be at a level of detail sufficient to pen-rut a comparative assessment of the alternatives discussed and will be analyzed in terms of the impact issues listed above in summary and matrix format. Alternatives will include the following: A. No action. B. Alternative Fire Station Locations. 1. Sleepy Hollow and North Ridge Street. [Other Potential Fire Station Locations to be Inserted Later] VH. ADVERSE ENVIRONI'IENTAL EFFECTS THAT CANNOT BE AVOIDED IF THE PROJECT IS IMPLEMENTED Adverse environmental impacts expected to occur if the Proposed Action is implemented regardless of the mitigation measures considered. VE I. IRREVERSIBLE AND IRRETRIEVABLE COMMITMENT OF RESOURCES Those natural and human resources listed in Sections IV and V that will be consumed, converted or made unavailable for future use if the Proposed Action is implemented. LY. GROWTH INDUCING IMPACTS A. Future growth potential. B. Impact upon local roadways, and future commercial and residential development. C. Other. X. EFFECTS ON THE USE AND CONSERVATION OF ENERGY RESOURCES VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK,NEW YORK PAGE 20 uL yr n{Lun.nm r{nc.i{.-�{RLy UKArI UCIJ JI-uYC. A. The energy sources to be used if the Proposed Action is implemented. B. Increased energy consumption. C. Energy conservation measures. M. SOURCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY XII. APPENDICES A. All SEQRA documentation, including a copy of the Environmental Assessment Form (EAF), the Positive Declaration and the DEIS Scope. B. Copies of all official correspondence related to issues discussed in the DEIS. C. Copies of all technical studies, in their entirety. does 2\100\n•z 7-002.kbo 11-26-97 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK.NEW YORK PAGE 21 VILLAG40F RYE BROOK FIRE STATION DRAFT DEIS SCOPE DRAFT SCOPE RYE BROOK FIRE STATION Proposed Fire Station Village of Rye Brook Westchester County, New York Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) Draft Scope of Issues to be Addressed Name of Project: Village of Rye Brook Fire Station Project Location: 200-202 North Ridge Street, Village of Rye Brook Westchester County, New York SEQRA Classification: Unlisted Action Lead Agency and Project Sponsor: Village of Rye Board of Trustees Village of Rye Brook 938 King Street Rye Brook, New York 10573 (914) 939-1121 Scoping Compliance: This Draft Scope was prepared by the Lead Agency as Project Sponsor in accordance with paragraphs 617.8(f)(1) through (5) of Section 617.8 SCOPING of 6 NYCRR Part 617. Following adoption of a Positive Declaration by the Lead Agency on December 2, 1997, the Draft Scope was circulated to all Involved and Interested Agencies for review and discussion purposes. Scoping Session: Monday, December 16, 1997 at O PM Village of Rye Brook ;��,.� O� "�n�TrrQcc Co-oi ve*a-� ( Rye Brook, New York 10573 `J Scope Adoption by Lead Agency: Specific calendar date to be inserted later. VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK.NEW YORK PAGE 1 VILL-kGE OF RYE BROOK FIRE STATION DRAFT DEIS SCOPE DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTION The proposed action involves the construction of a new Village fire station on the northeast comer of a 22.25-acre property located at the intersection of Betsy Brown Road and North Ridge Street in the Village of Rye Brook. The proposed fire station would be situated within the vicinity of the existing vacant gatekeeper's residence located on the site. The proposed action also involves associated site, drainage, roadway and landscaping improvements. The project area is approximately 1.1 acres and is generally conterminous with the boundaries of proposed lots 1 and 2 within a 40-lot proposed subdivision known as Red Roof Farms. This proposed subdivision is currently under review by the Village of Rye Brook. The proposed fire station would consist of a building approximately 80 feet in width and 85 feet in depth. The front of the station would be two stories and would include day facilities on the first floor and living quarters on the second floor. The rear of the station would include a 4-bay apparatus room and would be approximately 65 feet in depth. Access to the bays would be through each side of the building. The fire station site is roughly rectangular in shape and measures 175 feet on the north, 205 feet on the south, 240 feet on the west and 240 feet along the east (i.e., street frontage along North Ridge Street). The size and configuration of the site for the fire station was based on the size of the proposed building and the additional land area required for fire apparatus to access each side of the station. This site is considered as the primary site for a fine station within the Village based on the recommendation of the Village of Rye Brook Facilities Committee which submitted its recommendation to the Board of Trustees in August. The Committee, during its over two years of deliberation selected this site out of 14 potential sites within the Village. Site selection criteria included response time, topography of the site, size of the site, economics, traffic and safety. To assist it in its decision, the Committee relied on information included in the Fire Station Location Study, prepared by Carroll Buracker& Associates, Inc. as well as other appropriate materials. POTENTIAL SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACTS Based upon a review of the Full Environmental Assessment Form, the Proposed Action may have a significant adverse environmental impact on steep slopes; stormwater runoff, air quality; vegetation and wildlife; visual resources; noise and odor; traffic and transportation; land use; community services (including fire response time); and property values. GENERAL GUIDELINES 1. "Scoping" means the process by which the Lead Agency identifies the potentially significant adverse impacts related to the Proposed Action that are to be addressed in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS), including the content and level of detail of the analysis, the range of alternatives, the mitigation measures needed and the identification of non-relevant issues. Scoping provides a Project Sponsor with VILL-XGE OF RYE BROOK.NEW YORK PAGE 2 XILLAUE OF RYE BROOK FIRE STATION DRAFT DEIS SCOPE guidance on matters which must be considered and provides an opportunity for early participation by Involved Agencies and the public in the review of the Proposed Action. The primary goals of scoping are to focus the EIS on potentially significant adverse impacts and to eliminate consideration of those impacts that are irrelevant or nonsianificant. 2. This DEIS will cover all items in this "Scope of Issues" document. Each impact issue (e.g., soils, surface water, traffic, etc.) can be presented in a separate subsection which includes a discussion of existing conditions, significant impacts associated with the Proposed Action, and mitigation measures designed to minirrLe the identified impacts. If appropriate, impact issues listed separately in this document may be combined in the DEIS, as long as all issues are addressed. 3. Narrative discussions will be accompanied by appropriate tables, charts, graphs, and figures whenever possible. If a particular subject can be most effectively described in graphic format, the narrative discussion will merely summarize and highlight the information presented graphically. All plans and maps showing the site will include, as appropriate, adjacent homes, other neighboring uses and structures, roads and water bodies within a distance of not less than 100 feet from the property line of the Proposed Action. 4. Information will be presented in a manner which can be readily understood by the public. Use of technical terminologies will be avoided. When practical, impacts will be described in terms that the lay person can readily understand. 5. All discussions of mitigation measures will consider at least those measures mentioned in this "Scope of Issues" document. Where reasonable and necessary, they will be incorporated into the Proposed Action if they are not already so included. For any mitigation measures listed in this "Scope of Issues" document that are not incorporated into the Proposed Action, the reason why the Applicant considers them unnecessary will be discussed in the DEIS. The Applicant may suggest additional mitigation measures where appropriate. When no mitigation is needed, the DEIS will so indicate. 6. The document will be written in the third person (i.e., the terms "we" and "our" will not be used). The Applicant's conclusions and opinions, if given, will be identified as those of"the Applicant." 7. Any assumptions incorporated into assessments of impact will be clearly identified. In such cases, the "worst case" scenario analysis will also be identified and discussed. 8. The entire document will be checked carefully to ensure consistency with respect to the information presented in the various sections. VILLAGE OF RYE BR00K.NEW YORK PAGE 3 C VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK FIRE STATION DRAFT DEIS SCOPE ENI VTRONNIENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT CONTENT I. FRONT MATERIAL A. Cover Sheet: The DEIS will be preceded by a cover sheet that identifies the following: 1. That it is a Draft Environmental Impact Statement. 2. The name or descriptive title of the Proposed Action. 3. Location: Street names, Village of Rye Brook, Westchester County, New York State. 4. The Village of Rye Brook Board of Trustees as Lead Agency and Project Sponsor for the project and the name and telephone number of the following person to be contacted for further information: Village of Rye Brook, New York, Christopher J. Russo, Village Administrator, (914) 939-1121. 5. The name and address of the primary preparer(s) of the DEIS and the name and telephone number of a contact person representing the preparer(s). 6. Date of acceptance of the DEIS [specific calendar date to be inserted later]. 7. Deadline by which comments on the DEIS are due [specific calendar date to be inserted later]. B. List of Consultants Involved With the Project: The names, addresses and project responsibilities of all consultants involved with the project will be listed. C. Table of Contents: All headings which appear in the text will be presented in the Table of Contents along with the appropriate page numbers. In addition, the Table of Contents will include a list of figures, a list of tables, a list of appendix items, and a list of additional DEIS volumes, if any. II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A. The DEIS will include an executive summary. The executive summary will only include information found elsewhere in the main body of the DEIS and will be organized as follows: VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK,NEW YORK PAGE 4 t;ILLAGt OF RYE BROOK FIRE STATION DRAFT DEIS SCOPE 1. Brief description of the Proposed Action. 2. List of Involved Agencies and required approvals/permits. 3. Brief listing of the anticipated impacts and proposed mitigation measures for each impact issue discussed in the DEIS. y The presentation format will be simple and concise. 4. Brief description of the project alternatives considered in the DEIS. A table will be presented which assesses and compares each alternative relative to the various impact issues. III. INTRODUCTION The Introduction will provide a brief overview of the Proposed Action and a discussion of required approvals and/or permits which are necessary to accomplish the Proposed Action. Specific topics to be addressed include: A. A complete listing of the names and addresses of all Involved or Interested Agencies, Associations and/or Individuals who have review and approval authority or who have expressed an interest in reviewing the DEIS in order to provide comments thereon. Agencies which have review and approval authority will be separately identified. B. Site location with respect to regional setting within Westchester County; surrounding municipalities; and transportation facilities. C. Site location with respect to local setting within the Village of Rye Brook; general property description including acreage, tax map designations, zoning, easements, life estates, and private agreements that affect the future development and use of the property; previous and existing improvements; cultural resources (i.e., cemetery); road fi-ontage; brief descriptions of sit.- topography, geology, drainage, wetlands, streams and ponds; the character of the surrounding area; and available utilities. D. A statement as to the need for an Environmental Impact Statement will be provided. IV. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED ACTION A. Project History: Background discussion on the property including past activities on the site, uses and development proposals. VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK.NEW YORK PAGE 5 • c VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK FIRE STATION DRAFT DEIS SCOPE B. Statement of project purpose, need and benefit: Description of the proposed action's purpose, public need and benefit, including social and economic considerations. C. Project Description: The project description will include the following: 1. Listing of all Village, County, State, regional and Federal authorities having jurisdiction over the Proposed Action and the status of required approvals. Include list of Involved and Interested Agencies. 2. Detailed description of the proposed action including a description of the fire station operations (staffing, anticipated number of calls, etc.); proposed construction schedule and phasing; and description of construction processes. V. ENVIRON-MENTAL ANALYSES The DEIS shall include a discussion of the existing conditions, potentially significant adverse impacts and proposed mitigation measures for the following: A. Geology 1. Existing Conditions. a. Regional and bedrock geology. b. Surface and subsurface geological formations. A plan which shows the location and extent of significant rock outcrops, areas of less than 5 feet depth to bedrock, and special geological formations (e.g., any cliffs, ledges, large boulders, pits or sinkholes) will be included for the entire site. C. Depth to and nature of any bedrock formations. d. Viability of such formations for construction. 2. Potential Impacts. a. Blasting, or other rock removal, including location (map required). b. Extent and impact of construction in areas with shallow depth to bedrock. VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK.NEW YORK PAGE 6 ,VILLAGE OF RYE BROOM FIRE STATION DR,*7 DEIS SCOPE C. Other. 3. Mitigation Measures. a. Blasting mitigation plan, if required. b. Other. B. Soils 1. Existing Conditions. a. A map of the soil types based on the Westchester County Soil and Water Conservation District soil survey for the entire site. b. Description of soil characteristics including texture, soil bearing capacity, erodibility and drainage characteristics. C. Table of soils on site showing: (1) Erosion potential, including construction-related and long-term limitations. (2) Runoff potential, including construction-related and long- term limitations. (3) Permeability. (4) Construction potential for roads, buildings with basements, parking lots and underground utilities. d. Other pertinent soil information. 2. Potential Impacts. a. Description of soil type to be impacted, and to what extent, with a grading limit line indicated on the grading plan. Indicate the amount (preliminary cut and fill analysis) and location of earthwork anticipated. b. Potential erosion based on cut and fill analysis. C. Potential sedimentation impacts on wetlands and adjacent water bodies, if applicable. VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK.NEW YORK PAGE 7 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOD FIRE STATION DR.-kFi DEIS SCOPE d. Other. 3. Mitigation Measures. a. Description of proposed sedimentation and erosion control measures in accordance with Westchester County Best Management Practices Manual for Erosion and Sediment Control (1991). b. A grading limit line and clearing limit line and Construction Phasing Plan. C. Other. C. Slopes and Topography 1. Existing Conditions. a. General description and a graphic which shows 2-foot elevation contours for the site. b. Special topographic features, including natural basins, depressions and rock ledges or outcrops, not shown elsewhere. C. Other. 2. Potential Impacts. a. Extent and impact of construction on the following slope categories: 0-15%; 15-25% and 25+% (map required). b. Description of potential impacts to steep (15-25% and 25=00) slopes on the entire site, including but not limited to potential sedimentation impacts and the potential for slope failure (map required). 3. Mitigation Measures. a. Minimal site disturbance with respect to the removal, storage and disposal of rock and earth. VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK,NEW YORK PAGES VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK FIRE STATION DRAFT DEIS SCOPE b. Sedimentation and Erosion Control measures for the entire site in accordance with Westchester County Best Management Practices Manual for Erosion and Sediment Control(1991). C. Use of retaining walls to minimize proposed grading. d. Other. D. Water Resources - Surface and Groundwater 1. Existing Conditions. a. Existing surface water bodies (including classification), drainage patterns and wetland areas on the balance of the site and within 1/4-mile of the subject site's boundaries. b. Discharge points of existing drainage. Discuss existing stromwater runoff quality (including point and non-point pollution sources) and quantity within the watershed(s) of which the subject site is a part. C. Proximity to Long Island Sound. d. Other. 2. Potential Impacts. a. Changes to existing drainage patterns. b. Changes to existing discharge points. C. Water quality impacts on wetlands, ponds and streams on site and within 1/4-mile of the subject site's boundaries, including: (1) Increased contamination fi-om driveways and other impervious surfaces. (2) Increase nutrient loading and contamination due to the washing of fine apparatus or the use of fertilizers, pesticides, herbicides, fungicides or other chemicals. (3) Sedimentation of water bodies. VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK,NEW YORK PAGE 9 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK FIRE STATION DRAFT DEIS SCOPE d. Stolmwater runoff quantity impacts following project completion on neighboring upstream and downstream wetlands, ponds, other streams and Long Island Sound. e. Groundwater impacts, if any. f. Description of any permit requirements. g. Other. 3. Mitigation Measures. a. Erosion control measures. b. Storm Water Manaaement measures in accordance with the NYSDEC publication Reducing the Impacts of Storrmvater Runoff from Nall,Developments (1992). C. For stormwater runoff quality control measures, the following standards set by T. Schueler (1995) in Urban Watershed Management: Design of Urban Best Management Practices and the NYSDEC publication Reducing the Impacts of Stornm ater Runoff from Neu,Developments (1992). d. Point and non-point source pollution controls. e. Maintenance plan and responsibility for stormwater control systems. f. Compliance with the NYSDEC SPDES General Permit for Stormwater Discharges and other relevant regulations. g. Other. E. Vegetation and Wildlife 1. Existing Conditions. a. Woody and herbaceous species. (1) Distribution of vegetative cover types for the entire site (map required). VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK.NEW YORK PAGE 10 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK FIRE STATION DRAFT DEIS SCOPE (2) General species abundance and value to wildlife. (3) Approximate age and sizes of woody species. b. Presence of threatened, endangered or rare plant species on or near the site based upon existing available data and recent field inspection (map required). C. Survey of location, species, health condition and size of trees on the subject site as required by Chapter 235, Trees, of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook (map required). d. Site-specific analysis of resident and migratory wildlife (including any threatened, rare, endangered or nuisance species). Assessment shall examine habitat functions, where appropriate, (i.e., breeding habitat, transitional, staging areas, feeding and roosting sites and travel lanes). e. Other. 2. Potential Impacts. a. Trees removed or disturbed by proposed construction activities. If removal is proposed, the DEIS will include detailed information re zarding such removal, including identification of all trees greater than eight (8) inches in diameter at breast height (DBH) to be removed by species, size, health condition and total quantity. b. Cumulative loss of vegetation, overall and by vegetative type, upon project completion. C. Increased erosion resulting from removal of vegetation. d. Loss of wildlife habitat and impact on habitat functions caused by site development including but not limited to forests, riparian areas and wetlands. e. Fertilizer and pesticide impacts. f. Other. 3. Mitigation Measures. VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK.NEW YORK PAGE 11 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK FIRE STATION DR.-JFr DEIS SCOPE a. Tree preservation methods and utilization of existing cleared areas to the maximum extent practicable (map required). b. Establishment of minimal clearing and grading limit lines to depict maximum limits of areas of disturbance. C. Compliance with Chapter 235, Trees, of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook. d. Screening to reduce impacts on neighboring properties. e. Schematic landscape plan for the subject site showing proposed planting including typical plant list. f. Phased construction and landscape plan implementation, based upon limitations placed on the amount of land that may be cleared and disturbed at any one time. g. Other. F. Traffic and Transportation 1. Existing Conditions. a. A description of the following traffic corridors, at minimum, including pavement width/conditions, number of lanes, grades, traffic volume, parking and traffic controls. (1) North Ridge Street and Betsey Brown Road. (2) North Ridge Street south of Sleepy Hollow Road. (3) King Street (NYS Route 120A), south of the Hutchinson River Parkway . (4) King Street, on the westerly side of the roadway, south of Blind Brook Middle/High Schools. All roadways in the immediate area of the site will be shown graphically. b. Accident history for the intersections listed above and roadway frontages along the subject site, for at least a 3-year period. (a) Location. VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK.NEW YORK PAGE 12 VILLAdE OF RYE BROOD FIRE STATION DR*7 DEIS SCOPE (b) Date. (c) Time. (d) Type of accident. (e) Number of injuries. (f) Probable cause. (g) Road conditions. (h) Number of vehicles involved. C. Analysis of site access(es), including existing sight distance. 2. Potential Impacts. a. Estimation and distribution of site-generated traffic on area roads. Trip generation rates will represent conditions generally found for type and size of uses proposed. b. Intersection capacity analysis of future background (design year 2000) conditions based upon an annual growth factor of two percent (2%) per year applied to existing baseline volumes and including all developments planned or proposed in the immediate area of the site. C. Intersection capacity analysis of combined conditions (future background and proposed development of the site with projected site-generated traffic). d. Safety concerns regarding existing roadways — Sight distance evaluation at proposed access drive. e. Construction traffic - Volumes, types of vehicles, hours and routing. f Describe all permits required for proposed roadway improvements. g. Evaluate impacts to mass transportation. h. Other. 3. Mitigation Measures. a. Proposed improvements, including access, off-site roadway and sight distance. VILLAGE OF RYE BROOD.NEW YORK PAGE 13 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK FIRE STATION DR.*7 DEIS SCOPE b. Other. G. Air Quality 1. Existing Conditions. a. Identification and description of air quality pollutants of concern (carbon monoxide at a minimum). b. A brief discussion of existin, available air quality data will be provided for the vicinity of the proposed project site. C. Compliance with ambient air quality standards. 2. Potential Impacts. a. Indirect source emissions. b. Direct source emissions. C. Other. 3. Mitigation Measures. a. Construction activities. b. Other. H. Land Use and Zoning 1. Existing Conditions. a. Existing zoning of the site and surrounding area within 1/4-mile of the subject site's boundaries. b. Existing land uses on the site and surTounding area within 1/4- mile of the subject site's boundaries. C. Applicable land use plans and regulations for the site and within 1/4-mile of the subject site's boundaries. VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK,NEW YORE: PAGE 14 ,VILLAC'E OF RYE BROOD FIRE STATION DR.-kFi'DEIS SCOPE d. Recommendations of the Westchester County master plan, Patterns. e. Potential build-out, based on existing zoning, of areas within 1/4-mile of the subject site's boundaries. 2. Potential Impacts. a. Compatibility of proposed project with existing and proposed land uses. b. Other. 3. Mitigation .Measures. a. Describe proposed mirigation measures to minimize potential impact to surrounding land uses. Consider cumulative impact of other development proposals that are currently planned or proposed for the area surrounding the subject site. b. Other. I. Fire Response 1. Existing Conditions. a. Size of existing force and organization of service provider(s). b. Location of existing station. C. Number and type of apparatus. d. Average response time. e. Include consideration of cumulative impacts of other developments planned or proposed in the immediate area of the subject site. 2. Potential Impacts. a. Changes in fire response time. b. Other. VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK.NEW YORK PAGE 15 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK FIRE STATION DRAFT DEIS SCOPE 3. Mitigation Measures. a. Niodification in routing of fire responses b. Other. J. Utilities 1. Water Supply a. Existing Conditions. (1) Describe the current amount of water usage of the High Point Hospital. (2) Available capacity of public water supply, and applicable connection policies. (3) Discussion of existing water supply infrastructure and Current pressure on the subject site and within immediate service area. (4) Identify location of water lines and related infrastructure elements serving and within the vicinity of the subject site (map required). b. Potential Impacts. (1) Estimate increase in water usage by proposed use within the development. (2) Analysis of proposed development's impacts to water pressure within the service area. (3) Discuss impacts related to construction of additional water supply infrastructure including impacts on existing users within service area. (4) For each of the above analyses, also include consideration of cumulative impacts of other developments planned or proposed in the immediate area of the subject site. (List of developments to be supplied by Lead Agency). VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK.NEW YORK PAGE 16 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK FIRE STATION DRAFT DEIS SCOPE (5) Other. C. Mitigation `'leasures. (1) Proposed water supply infrastructure improvements. (2) Other. 2. Sanitary Sewage a. Existing Conditions. (1) Describe the current amount of sewage disposal of the High Point Hospital. (2) Available capacity of sewage disposal system, and applicable connection policies. (3) Discussion of existing sewage disposal infrastructure on the subject site and within immediate service area. (4) Identify location of sewer lines and related infrastructure elements serving and within the vicinity of the subject site (map required). b. Potential Impacts. (1) Estimate of increases in sewage disposal from the proposed development by use. (2) Discuss impacts related to construction of proposed infrastructure. (3) Other. C. Mitigation Measures. (1) Compliance with permit requirements of service provider. (2) Other. VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK.NEW PORK PAGE 17 VILLaGF.OF RYE BROOK FIRE STATION DRAFT DEIS SCOPE K Visual and Community Character 1. Existing Conditions. a. Description of the visual and community character within a 1/4- mile of the subject site's boundaries. b. Visual relationship between the project site and the surrounding area using photographs, sight line diagrams and cross sections, as appropriate. C. Identification of significant visual features. 2. Potential Impacts. a. Changes in visual character of the area as a result of the Proposed Action. b. Exterior lighting. C. Visual impacts to adjacent properties and roadway corridors. d. Provide architectural rendelinas and details, as appropriate. e. Other. 3. Mitigation Measures. a. Preservation of existing trees and proposed buffering. b. Restricted clearing limit lines. C. Landscaping, including buffer screening plans. d. Other. L. Noise 1. Existing Conditions. a. Detailed discussion of existing noise levels on the property. b. Other. VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK-NEW YORK PAGE IS VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK FIRE STATION DR.*7 DEIS SCOPE 2. Potential Impacts. a. Impacts of noise related to operation of fire station. b. Describe noise that may be generated during construction of the proposed development and its likely duration, including consideration of on-site noise (e.g., blasting. construction equipment) and construction traffic noise on area roadways. Identify potential sources and decibel levels. C. Other. 3. Mitigation Measures. a. Proposed noise attenuation measures. b. Modifications in fire station operations to minirize impacts on adjacent properties. C. Other. IN I. Property Values 1. Existing Conditions. a. Discussion of eXisting property values based on sales data, tax assessor values or other appropriate data within the vicinity of the subject site. b. Other. 2. Potential Impacts. a. Impacts of proposed fire station on adjacent property values. b. Other. 3. Mitigation Measures. a. Modifications in fire station design or operations to minimize impacts on adjacent property values. VILLAGE OF RYE BROOD.NEW YORK PAGE 19 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK FIRE STATION DRAFT DEIS SCOVE b. Provision for landscape buffer and screening. C. Other VI. ALTERNATIVES The description and evaluation of the following alternatives to the Proposed Action will address all of the topics in Sections IV and V of this document and be at a level of detail sufficient to permit a comparative assessment of the alternatives discussed and will be analyzed in terms of the impact issues listed above in summary and matrix format. Alternatives will include the following: A. No action. B. Alternative Fire Station Locations. 1. Sleepy Hollow and North Ridge Street. [Other Potential Fire Station Locations to be Inserted Later] VH. ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS THAT CANNOT BE AVOIDED IF THE PROJECT IS LN- MLEVIENTED Adverse environmental impacts expected to occur if the Proposed Action is implemented regardless of the mitigation measures considered. VIII. IRREVERSIBLE AND IRRETRIEVABLE CO`IMITIIENT OF RESOURCES Those natural and human resources listed in Sections IV and V that will be consumed, converted or made unavailable for future use if the Proposed Action is implemented. IX. GROWTH INDUCING I`IPACTS A. Future growth potential. B. Impact upon local roadways, and future commercial and residential development. C. Other. X. EFFECTS ON THE USE AND CONSERVATION OF ENERGY RESOURCES VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK.NEW YORK PAGE'0 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOD FIRE STATION DRAFT DEIS SCOPE A. The energy sources to be used if the Proposed Action is implemented. B. Increased energy consumption. C. Energy conservation measures. XI. SOURCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY XII. APPENDICES A. All SEQRA documentation, including a copy of the Environmental Assessment Form (EAF), the Positive Declaration and the DEIS Scope. B. Copies of all official correspondence related to issues discussed in the DEIS. C. Copies of all technical studies, in their entirety. docs2\100Vye7-002.kbo l 1-26-97 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOD.NEW YORK PAGE 21