Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAbandoned Application ME BUILD- MENT R E C E VIL E OF RY i oOK MAY 2 4 2019 938 KING t Q\ ET RYE BR ,NY 10573 (914)9-3 9 39-5801 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK BUILDING DEPARTMENT DEMOLITION PERMIT APPLICATION FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: Approval Date: Permit#: Application Fee:$ a50Q11 Approval Signature: Permit Fees:$ Disapproved: Other: Application dated: 04/05/2019 is hereby made to the Building Inspector of the Village of Rye Brook,NY,for the issuance of a Permit for the interior alteration of an existing building,or for a change in use,as per detailed statement described below. 1. Job Address: 900 King Street S 9 8-1-13 Zone: PUD 2. Proposed Demolition.(Descri d 9 o it g is to be demolished completely. 3. Property Owner: 900 King Street Owner,LLC Address: 200 Madison Avenue,26th Floor,New York,NY 10016 Phone# (212)481-1 122 Cell# email: Applicant: George Comfort&Sons,Inc. Address:200 Madison Avenue,26th Floor,New York,NY 10016 Phone# (212)542-2133 Cell# email: JMC Planning Engineering landscape Architecture Architect/Engineer: &Land Surveying,PLLC Address: 120 Bedford Road,Armonk NY 10504 Phone# (914)273-5225 Cell# email: rbohlander@jmcpllc.com General Contractor: Address: Phone# Cell# email: 4. Estimated cost of construction $ (NOTE:The estimated cost shall include all labor,material,scaffolding,fixed equipment,professional fees,and material and labor which may be donated gratis.) 5. Type of construction:(wood frame,masonry,steel,etc...) Masonry,steel and glass 6. Method(s)of Demolition: Building will be gutted and then taken down top to bottom 7. Number&Location of Fuel Oil Tanks to be Removed: NlA 8. Number of Stories: 3 Height to Highest Ridge: 49' To Highest Chimney: N/A 9. Estimated date of completion: 05/17/2019 I 3/21/19 p:2016/16222/AdmirdDemo Permit Fu1103-27-2019.pdf This application must be properly completed in its entirety and must include the notarized signature(s) of the legal owner(s) of the subject property, and the applicant of record in the spaces provided. Any application not properly completed in its entirety and/or not properly signed shall be deemed null and void and will be returned to the applicant. Please note that application fees are non-refundable. STATE OF NEW YORK,COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER ) as: ,being duly sworn,deposes and states that he/she is the applicant above named, (print name of individual signing as the applicant) and further states that (s)he is the legal owner of the property to which this application pertains, or that (s)he is the for the legal owner and is duly authorized to make and file this application. (indicate architect,contractor,agent,attorney,etc.) That all statements contained herein are true to the best of his/her knowledge and belief, and that any work performed,or use conducted at the above captioned property will be in conformance with the details as set forth and contained in this application and in any accompanying approved plans and specifications,as well as in accordance with the New York State Unifonn Fire Prevention &Building Code,the Code of the Village of Rye Brook and all other applicable laws,ordinances and regulations. /- Sworn to before me this '` Sworn to before me this day of , 20� day of , 20 '.0' 6-a +V k' "w— Signature of Property Owner Signature of Applicant Print Na of Property Owner Print Name of Applicant 2 Notary Public Notary Public ELIZABETH R TOLVE ' Notary Public,State of New York No.01T06129900 Qualified in Westchester County Commission Expires July 05,20 2 3/21/19 JPMcHa1e James P.McHale,Jr.Entomologist,Cornell University,B.S. Douglas J.McHale,Plant Pathologist,University of Delaware,B.S. Pest Management,Inc. Richard D.McHale,Environmental Scientist,Wilkes University,B.S. Commercial,Industrial,Residential 241 Bleak-ley Avenue,Buchanan,NY 10511 fo Environmental Management 208 Myrtle Avenue,Boonton,NJ 07005 (914)739-4472•FAX(914)739-6762 NN."N-w.nvests.com April 15, 2019 Tanya Summa D [E � [E � Y EE Property Manager George Comfort & Sons 900 King Street MAY 2 4 2019 Rye Brook, NY 10580 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK Re: 900 King Street BUILDING DEPARTMENT Rye Brook, NY 10580 To Whom It Concerns JP McHale Pest Management has been providing service to the aforementioned property since 2004. We currently service the common areas and exterior of structure, with no issues reported. If you need further explanation of services rendered, contact me at (914) 469-6767. Sincerely Y rs, U� Robert Luoica Sr VP, Innovative Pest Solutions JP McHale Pest Management Not Just Good, GUARANTEED! BUIL MENT VI E OF RYE OK JUN - 6 2019 938 KING ET RYE BR. NY 10573 (914)9 39-5801 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK a BUILDING DEPARTMENT FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: BOT Approval Date: PB Approval Date: BOT Disapproval Date: PB Disapproval Date: Attach Resolution Hereto: OT[ ] PB[ ] ZBA[ ] Chairman: ��11 SITE PLAN FEE: 1.tso Od DATE PAID: v ENVIRONMENTAL FEE: DATE PAID: C) OTHER: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL Submission of this application does not assure placement on any Planning Board Agenda.The Applicant will be notified of such placement. *********************************************************************************************************** This application references but is not limited to the following sections of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook;§250 ZONING,§209 SITE PLAN REVIEW,§235 TREES,§107 DEMOLITION OF BUILDINGS,§224 SWIMMING POOLS,§121 EXCAVATION&TOPSOIL REMOVAL,§118 EROSION&SEDIMENT CONTROL,§213 STEEP SLOPES PROTECTION,§219 SUBDIVISION OF LAND, §250-40 NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS.Applicants and their Design Professionals are strongly advised to reviewthe above mentioned code sections online at,www.nLebrook.org prior to completing and/or submitting this application. APPLICATION FEE SCHEDULE: Residential Dwellings- $325,plus$20 er io d 1 Non-Residential Buildings - $475 plus $3 r r ac Planned Unit Development-$575 per acre PUD Amendment- $300 Site Plan Amendment- $575 Wetlands&Watercourse- $1,150 N [ 9 Consultant Review(Escrow)Fee: Minimum fee$250-maximum fee$2,500,to be determined by the Village Engineer. Application fees are non-refundable.The applicant's Escrow Account must have a positive balance at all times prior to any Consultant,Attorney,or Village review. Escrow Fees and Site Plan Fees must be paid on separate checks made payable to the Village of Rye Brook. 1. Site Address: 900 King Street Parcel ID#: 129.68-1-13 Zone: PUD 2. Property Owner: 900 King Street Owner, LLC Address: 200 Madison Ave. 26th Floor, NY, NY 10016 E-Mail: sketchabaw@gcomfort.com Tel.#:(914) 694.1090 Other: 3. Applicant: 900 King Street Owner, LLC Address: 200 Madison Ave. 26th Floor NY, NY 10016 _E-Mail: sketchabow@gcomfort.com Tel.#: (914) 694-1090 Other: 4. Design Professional: JMC, PLLC Address: 120 Bedford Road,Armonk, NY 10504 E-Mail: Tel.#: (914) 273-S22S Other: 5. Designate to whom correspondence is to be sent: Design Professional Note:If applicant is a"Contract Vendee",please attach a copy of the contract summary with financial and confidential terms deleted. 1 3/21/19 6. Street which property abuts: Arbor Drive 7. Does property connect directly into State or County highway? (x)NO O YES: 8. Is site within 500 feet of Village Boundary?( )NO (x)YES If yes note all bordering municipalities: 9. Total area of site: 17.77 acres Area of site activity: 9.50 acres 10. Site coverage: 41.9 %; Building coverage: 12.3 % 11. Existing building size: 95,400 sf New/additional building size: 0 sf 12. Existing parking spaces: 595 New parking spaces: 0 13. Nature of proposed activity: Demolition of existing building and all associated parking areas,walkways,curbs lighting,etc Please note that this application must include the notarized signature(s) of the legal owner(s) of the above-mentioned property, in the space provided below. Any application not bearing the legal property owner's notarized signature(s) shall be deemed null and void, and will be returned to the applicant. STATE OF NEW YORK,COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER ) as: '� W j SAff JA §6r&&L ing�uly sworn,deposes and states that he/she is the applicant above named, (print name of in rvidu. signing as the applicant) and further states that (s)he is the legal owner of the property to which this application pertains, or that (s)he is the for the legal owner and is duly authorized to make and file this application. (indicate architect,contractor,agent,attorney,etc.) That all statements contained herein are true to the best of his/her knowledge and belief, and that any work performed,or use conducted at the above captioned property will be in conformance with the details as set forth and contained in this application and in any accompanying approved plans and specifications,as well as in accordance with the New York State Uniform Fire Prevention &Building Code,the Code of the Village of Rye Brook and all other applicable laws,ordinances and regulations. Sworn to before me this 61 Sworn to before me this �D day of , 20 1 / day of , 20� o N tary k-'s 16 4Si dWN1i-�LL�- tgna a of Property Owner Signature of Applicant 'S,KE&M o 164S 0 S.&-Ic� Print Name of Property 6wner Print Name of Applicant TNJ�fIA ODUF�4A T IdGTAKf PUBLIC STATE OF ME"YOF^X WESTCHESTER COUNTY LIC.CIO U6202214 COM EXP. ---�; 2 3121/19 P:\2016\16222\ADMIN\Site Plan Application 06-06-2019.pdf VILLA.6E'OF RYt,"OOK R1 JUN - 6 2019 938 King Straet, Rye Brook;N.Y. 10573 (914)939-0753 F x(9I,i4 939-5801 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK wti�tv.`, ook:ciQ BUILDING DEPARTMENT SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REVIEW CHECKLIST This form shall serve as a checklist for site plan submittal and review by the Village of Rye Brook. The use of this plan review checklist by the applicant is to ensure compliance with the technical provisions of§209 of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook entitled, Site Plan Review, pertaining to preliminary and final plan preparation. The Village Code is available on the Village Website at: www.ryebrook.org. Prior to the appearance before ANY meeting or hearing of the Planning Board, the applicant must comply with all Notification Requirements of Code Section 250-40. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL SHALL INCLUDE: 1. APPLICATIONS. Completed and signed including correspondences. 2. CHECKLIST. Completed and signed. 3. PLANS. Signed, Sealed & Dated. Three paper (3) copies and one (1) electronic version. One (1) record set with original signatures, dates and seals shall be provided and submitted with two (2) copies that clearly indicate the signatures, dates, and seals shown on the record set. 4. FEES: All application fees and Environmental fee. A separate check for filing fee and Environmental fee. 5. Environmental Assessment Form. Form available on the NYS DEC website and mapper. 6. Electronic Copy. Complete copy of all plans and shall be submitted electronically at time of submission. 7. Notarized Affidavit of Sign Posting & Mail Notification. I, Steve Ketchabaw (Applicant's signature)have read the Notification Requirements of Code Section 250-40 and will provide notification as required. IDENTIFICATION OF APPLICANT(S): Identification of Applicant: Steve Ketchabaw, Owners Representative, 900 King Street Owners LLC Applicant: 900 King Street Owners, LLC Address: 200 Madison Avenue, 26th Floor, New York, NY 10016 Tel. #: (914)694-1090 Fax: - E-Mail: sketchabawagcomfort.com Project Name: 900 King Street Demolition Site Plan Project Address: 900 King Street, Rye Brook, NY Current Property Owner: 900 King Street Owner, LLC Address: 200 Madison Avenue, 26th Floor, New York, NY Tel. #: (914)694-1090 Fax: E-Mail: sketchabaw@gcomfort.com IDENTIFICATION OF PROPERTY: Identifying Title: 900 King Street Tax Designation: Section: 129.68 Block: 1 Lot: 13 Zoning District: PUD Street which property abuts: Arbor Drive Plan Submission Date: June 6th, 2019 Site Plan Checklist Page 1 of 7 3/21/19 Project Address 900 King Street Y N NA PLAN REQUIREMENTS Q O O 3 copies of plans prepared and signed by a registered Land Surveyor,Engineer or Architect. 0 O O One(1)electronic copy of all submitted plans and surveys. 0( O O Topographic Survey stamped by New York State Land Surveyor with license number and seal. O O 01 Topographic survey scale of one(1) inch per twenty(20) feet or larger. 0 O O Section, block and lot numbers of the property taken from the latest tax records along with a copy of the most recent property card on file with the Town of Rye Tax Assessor's office. O O 01 Name of the proposed subdivision plan. 0 O O Name and address of the owner of record. Q O O Name and address of the applicant. O O (A Deed reference(s). 0 O O Names, addresses and signature of every Engineer, Architect, Land Surveyor or Soil Scientist whose professional seal appears on any site plan submitted to the Board. 0 O O North arrow and scale. ID O O Location map at the minimum scale of 1"equals 1,000 feet. 0 O O Area of all lots,in square feet. 10 O O Engineering notes on plans as stated in application packages. O O Q Copies of all existing and proposed deed restrictions or covenants applying to the property, including, but not limited to, covenants and agreements restricting the use and establishing future ownership and maintenance responsibilities for all private roads,recreation,and open space areas. O O 0 Any prior land use approvals with respect to the subject property. 000 Date the plans were first drafted. Any revision(s)made to any of the sheets first submitted are to be so noted in the revision block. The revision block is to be placed on the originals of the revised sheets. Additional paper copies are to be made& submitted for the Planning Board&Building Dept.to replace those sheets previously submitted. 0 O O Other existing site improvements,including, but not limited to, fences, landscape or retaining walls, landscaping & screening. 000 Location of all buildings and structures on the premises and approximate location of all neighboring buildings or structures within 100 feet of the lot line. 0 O O Fees paid to The Village of Rye Brook Building Department. 0 O O Any revisions to plans shall be identified with a revision cloud and numbered revision triangle V N NA ABUTTING PROPERTY INFORMATION O O I® The names and addresses of all abutting property owners within 250 ft as indicated in the Municipal records. JQ O O Zoning and use of abutting properties noted on plans. 0 O O Shape,size,height and location of existing buildings and driveways within one hundred(100)feet of the site. O O 10 Location and description of existing easements within one hundred(100)feet of the site. 0 O O Location of existing private or public trails within one hundred(100)feet of the site. 0 O O Location of existing roads,scenic roads and/or driveways within two hundred(200) feet of the site. 30 O O Location of proposed parkland. If none state nearest recreation facility O O A Location of existing septic system leach fields within two hundred(200)feet of the site. 10 O O Locations,dimensions,grades and flow direction of existing sewers,culverts,waterlines as well as other underground utilities within and adjacent to the property. Site Plan Checklist Page 2 of 7 3/21/19 Project Address 900 King Street ID O O The location of all existing watercourses, intermittent streams,wetland areas and springs,consistent with the definitions set forth in Chapter 245, Wetlands and Watercourses,of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook. Y N NA PROPOSED SITE PLAN INFORMATION )0 O O Sufficient, acceptable information to readily determine the location, bearing, and length of every street line, lot line, and property boundary line. O O 0 Location of all building setback lines. 9 O O Topographic data at a minimum contour interval of 2'-0"increments,showing existing and proposed contours on the property and extending a minimum of 25 feet into all adjacent properties. JO O O The location and characteristics of the different areas of vegetation, including the identification of all individual trees 12 or more inches in diameter at breast height("DBH"), protected trees of any size, as well as stands of trees and wooded areas, within areas of proposed disturbance, consistent with the provisions of Chapter 235, Trees, of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook. 1000 Location and proposed development of all buffer areas, including existing vegetative cover. A O O Location and description of any zoning district and municipal boundaries including a zoning compliance chart for the existing and proposed lots. ® O O Shape, size,height and location of all existing and proposed buildings. O O ID Location and description of any existing and proposed easements. P O O Location and dimensions of all existing and proposed streets, driveways,sidewalks,parking spaces,bicycle parking, loading areas and other facilities associated with the proposed use. O O 19 Identification of the location and amount of building area proposed for retail sales or similar commercial activity. 10 O O Location of existing and proposed utilities(water,sewer,gas,electrical,telephone,oil tank etc.). O O 9 Design and location of all existing and proposed wells, septic tanks and leach field systems,or methods of waste water disposal. 1) O O Location,type and size of all existing and proposed landscaping and screening including fences and walls. O O 9 Location, size and proposed screening of outdoor storage areas,if any. )Q O O Location, design and construction material of all existing or proposed site improvements, including drains, culverts, retaining walls,landscape walls and fences. O O 10 Exterior lighting plan and proposed signs to be located on site, including sign orientation,size,height,and elevation view. O O )0 Storm drainage plan and plans for snow removal and storage. O O ID Pedestrian and automobile circulation plan. O O X) Construction drawings for pavements, walks,steps,curbing,drainage&other structures associated with the proposed use. 9 O O Erosion and sedimentation control plan,including installation details of proposed control measures,directive construction notations and a schedule for the installation and maintenance of proposed control measure. )0 O O Description of measures planned to assure proper erosion and sedimentation control in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 118 entitled "Erosion and Sediment Control,"of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook. P O O Drawing and computation for storm water detention design for a 25-year storm in accordance with the Westchester County Best Management Practices )0 O O Rock outcroppings and areas of steep slope consistent with the definitions set forth in Chapter 213,Steep Slope Protection, of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook. p O O Location of any common lands and/or public lands. 9 O O Phasing or an estimated project construction schedule. O O 10 Supporting documents,including deeds,maintenance, condominium agreements,etc. Site Plan Checklist Page 3 of 7 3/21/19 Project Address 900 King Street O O Location of proposed construction or area of disturbance and its relationship to any property line, easement, building, structure, road, wall, fence, sewage disposal system, well, wetland feature or tree exceeding six inches in diameter measured at a height of four feet from the ground 000 Estimate of earthwork showing the quantity of any material to be imported to and/or removed from the site including a chart with the number/species and size of any trees to be removed. O O ID Location and size of areas of soils by soil types in the area of proposed disturbance and to a distance of 100 feet surrounding the area of disturbance. O O JU Cross sections of steep slope areas. O O A Retaining walls or like constructions,with details of construction. O O lD Approximate boundaries of any areas subject to flooding or stormwater overflows, including areas of special flood hazard and coastal high-hazard areas, consistent with the definitions set forth in Chapter 130, Flood Damage Prevention, of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook. Approximate Wetlands and wetland buffer boundaries shall be clearly delineated. O O Location of fire and other emergency zones, including the location of fire hydrants. O O 10 Studies to include,but not necessarily limited to: environmental impact analysis,wildlife,traffic,stormwater management,recreation,public service, fiscal impact,visual impact and historic significance documentation,or a written request to waive the submission requirements for these studies. O O A Amount of any bonds required. O O J9 Amount of excavated material to be removed from site, if any. Y N NA OTHER(as applicable) O O JU Record of application for and approval status of all necessary permits from state and county officials and local utility companies. O O 1!0 Identification of any federal,state or county permits required for the project's execution, including project referrals, if any,&environmental review procedures mandated by Article 8,Environmental Quality Review,of the Environmental Conservation Law(SEQRA). O O 19 Any other information felt necessary by the Planning Board to allow the Board to proceed with consideration&to make an informed decision. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CHECKLIST WESTCHESTER COUNTY PLANNING BOARD Notice to Applicants/Developers: At some point during the development review process your project may be referred to the Westchester County Planning Board for review and comment in accordance with state and county laws that require local planning boards, zoning boards of appeals and governing bodies to refer certain development applications to the County Planning Board. Referral to the County Planning Board may not occur until your project has progressed well along through the design process. Since the Planning Board's comments may impact project design, this checklist is provided to encourage early consideration of these areas of concern by applicants to avoid project changes later. For information on the County Planning Board review process and to access an electronic copy of this checklist, go online to www.westchestergov.com/planningreferrals or contact Lukas Herbert at lah5@westchestergov.com. I. COUNTY PLANNING BOARD POLICIES: Written policies underlie all recommendations of the County Planning Board. Westchester 2025-Context for County and Municipal Planning and Policies to Guide County Planning,adopted by the County Planning Board on 5/6/08,amended 115110,can be found at ww.westchestergov.com/2025. ❑ Westchester 2025: Policies should be reviewed to determine how they relate to the development proposal. II. IMPACTS TO COUNTY FACILITIES AND SERVICES: The County Planning Board coordinates the review of development projects with Westchester County departments to identify and address potential impacts on County services and infrastructure. In some situations, permits and approvals may be required that could change project design. Site Plan Checklist Page 4 of 7 3/21/19 Project Address 900 King Street ❑ Map of County Facilities: Review the State & County Roads and Parks map (which also includes county channel lines) to identify proximity to County facilities at: www.westchestergov.com/plannin'-docs,/pdfmaps/countystateroadsparks.pdf. Other useful map links for information about environmental features, septic/sewer map, county sewer districts map, etc can be found at: www.westchestergov.com,'maps ❑ COUNTY ROAD: Applications for development on sites that abut a County road must be submitted for review by the County Department of Public Works. Information and forms can be found at: www.westchestergov.com/dpw/bldgperm.htm. Former County Roads do not need review by the Department of Public Works, but will still likely trigger a review by the County Planning Board. ❑ COUNTY CHANNEL LINES: Applications for development on sites within 100 feet of a designated County Channel Line require a stream control permit from the County Department of Public Works. Information and forms can be found at: www.westchestergov.com/dpw/bldgperm.htm ❑ COUNTY PARK: New construction & land alteration projects adjacent to County parks are expected to address screening& buffer of new uses from the park, as appropriate. Stormwater should not drain from a developed site onto a County park without acceptable quantity and quality controls.County parks are designated as Critical Environmental Areas. ❑ SEWAGE TREATMENT AT COUNTY TREATMENT PLANT: Local municipalities are required to reduce and eliminate inflow and infiltration(I&I)into the sanitary sewage systems tributary to County treatment plants.New development will be expected to reduce I&I in relation to generation of new flow at a ratio of three to one. This requirement must be discussed with local officials. ❑BEE-LINE BUS SERVICE: Bee-Line bus stops serving a development site should be identified on plans or noted if located off-site. If a bus stop is located along the site's frontage, the applicant should contact the County Department of Transportation to discuss impacts and the need for improvements. Safe and separate pedestrian access should be provided to link a bus stop and sidewalk with building entrances. Information on County bus service and design guidelines can be found at: westchestergov.com/transportation/i m ages/Bus°/`20 Servi ce%2OG u i del i n es.pdf ❑FAIR AND AFFORDABLE HOUSING: Many municipalities require inclusion of fair & affordable units in new developments. Financial assistance to achieve fair & affordable housing development is available through Westchester County & other sources. Applications that include new residential units to be affirmatively marketed & sold or rented subject to fair & affordable housing provisions should be tied to Westchester County guidelines on affordability including income guidelines of eligible households that can be found at: http:,/homes.westchestergov.com/. If County funding is sought to develop fair & affordable housing,the County Board of Legislators must be included as an involved agency under SEQR. ❑RECYCLING: New buildings must contain a designated area of sufficient size for separation and storage of recyclables and trash. Building expansions should also include sufficient space for separation and storage of recyclables. For more information about County recycling requirements go to: www.westchestergov.com/environment_recycling.htm ❑STORM SEWER SYSTEM: Any connections to a County storm sewer line will require a permit from the Department of Public Works in accordance with the County Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination (IDDE) law. Information & forms can be found at: www.westchestergov.com/dpw/bldgperm.htm Non-stormwater discharges to the County storm sewer system are prohibited. III. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS The County Planning Board's land use policies focus attention on several aspects of development that may have intermunicipal and quality of life impacts.The list below includes areas most frequently commented on by the County Planning Board. ❑WATER: All development plans should include sufficient provisions for stormwater management, water quality measures and mitigation of flooding. ❑Plans should identify the major drainage basin or watershed the site is located in (Croton River, Upper Hudson River, Lower Hudson, Upper Long Island Sound, Bronx River and Lower Long Island Sound). An interactive map with watershed boundaries can be found at www.westchestergov.com/planning/maps&Iists/drainbasins I I x 17.html ❑Watershed plans have been developed for several of the County's watersheds - the Croton, Indian Brook-Croton Gorge, Bronx River & Long Island Sound watersheds - that include specific recommendations that apply to development projects. See recommendations in watershed plans at:planning.westchestergov.com/index.php?option=com content&task=view&id= 1231& Itemid=2204 Site Plan Checklist Page 5 of 7 3/21/19 Project Address 900 King Street ❑Development that involves filling, creation of impervious surfaces or buildings and substantive loss of natural vegetation in a floodplain or flood prone area should be avoided. ❑Above ground, vegetated retention/detention basins or devices are preferred because they perform better, are easier to inspect and maintain and provide additional environmental benefits over subsurface structural devices. Any such treatments should not be constructed within wetlands or buffer areas around wetlands. ❑The development should treat and retain as much stormwater on-site as possible, particularly when the site is located in a drainage basin with known flooding problems. A Construction Stormwater Toolbox with tools and sources of technical information related to the construction activities and stormwater management best practices is available from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation at:www.dec.ny.gov/chemical/8694.html ❑New development should include protection of aquatic resources. For more information about protection of aquatic resourc-es & buffer areas,go to: planning.westchestergov.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1491&Itemid=2458 El Impervious cover should be minimized. Permeable paving surfaces should be used where feasible. Vegetative rain gardens should be used, particularly in areas of overland or channelized stormwater flow, to improve stormwater quality and reduce runoff volume. For more information,go to: www.westchestergov.com/stormwater ❑Buildings along coastlines and low lying area should consider the impacts of sea level rise. Specific consideration is required of potential impacts to surface and subsurface drinking water supplies. ❑ SITE LAYOUT. Aesthetic design,building orientation and community character should be considered in the site layout and building appearance. El In most locations,buildings should face the street and have pedestrian access from the street. ❑Commercial buildings should be located near the front street line with the majority of parking located in the rear of the building. Even gas stations and convenience stores should be upfront in a landscaped setting with parking,pumps and canopy toward the rear. ID Buildings should be of pedestrian-scale when seen from the sidewalk. El Building facades should contribute to and enhance the character of the community. ❑Driveway and pathway connections should be provided to adjacent sites when possible and crosseasements provided. ❑ STREETS. Street design should reduce unwarranted paving and promote connectivity. ❑New streets should connect with adjacent streets wherever feasible to prevent the proliferation of dead-end streets and promote neighborhood integration. ❑Connections could be vehicular or pedestrian/bicycle only,where appropriate. ❑Street widths should be minimized for streets with low traffic volume to reduce speeds and impervious surfaces. Lane widths of 12 feet are only appropriate for major roadways. ❑Driveway widths should be no more than 9 feet to reduce impervious surfaces. ❑Permeable paving surfaces should be used where feasible. ❑ GREEN TECHNOLOGY. New development should include as many green building elements as possible, such as:renewable building materials, energy efficient heating/cooling systems and fixtures,water saving devices,green roofs and permeable paving surfaces. Information can be obtained from the U.S. Green Building Council at: www.usgbc.org. ❑ LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING. The site improvements should enhance community character. Site Plan Checklist Page 6 of 7 3/21/19 Project Address 900 King Street ❑ Landscaping should consist of native plant species appropriate for the location.Invasive plant species should be prohibited. Invasive plant information available at:www.westchestergov,com/planning/environmental/Reports/InvasivePtantsBrochO8.pdf ❑ Pollutant tolerant plantings should effectively shield parking, loading areas and refuse collection sites. ❑ Site lighting should be provided at the lowest safe levels and lowest heights,avoiding all spillage off site. ❑ PEDESTRIANS. Safe,convenient and ADA accessible pedestrian access is provided. ❑ A sidewalk should be provided along the site frontage along each street. ❑ Direct pedestrian connections should be made from the front of the building to the sidewalk.Pedestrian crossings of drive-ways& parking lots should be minimized or avoided. If they must be provided, painted crosswalks should be provided through parking lots. ❑ ADA accessibility must be provided. ❑ BICYCLISTS. Provisions for bicyclists should be incorporated into project design. ❑ Bicycle parking should be provided in commercial and residential developments. Guidelines can be found at: www.apbp.org/resource/resmgr/publ ication s/bicycle_parking_gui del ines.pdf ❑ If near a trailway or bicycle route, extra consideration should be given to bicycle accessibility such as bike lanes on internal roadways, bicycle parking and other amenities. ❑ Drive-thru lanes at uses such as banks and fast-food restaurants should also be accessible for bicycles. Waiver: Upon finding by the Building Inspector, Village Engineer, Planning Board or Board of Trustees that, due to the particular character or limited nature of development or change in use or to special conditions peculiar to a site, the submission of a final site plan,or certain portions of information normally required as part of the site development plan, is inappropriate or unnecessary or that strict compliance with said submission requirements will cause extraordinary and unnecessary hardship, such official or Board may waive such submission requirements wherever, in the opinion of such official or Board, such waiver will be consistent with the goal of promoting the public health, safety and general welfare of the community. The findings for granting such waiver shall become a part of the public record. Any waiver request must be made in writing, and include sufficient detailed information for the appropriate authority to make an informed decision. Design Professional's Certification of Completion of Checklist I have fully reviewed the Village of Rye Brook's requirements and certify this application to be a complete submission. I understand that an incomplete plat or incomplete checklist shall be deemed an incomplete submission and shall be returned to the applicant upon determination of such by the appropriate authority. Name(Print) Anth ny P. Nester, RLA pNl( •P� A���, L Signature / kp\j - ) Date June 6, 2019 a0191 Pro eal Site Plan Checklist Page 7 of 7 3/21/19 D [EC EWE Short Environmental Assessment For ii JUN - 6 2019 01 Part I -Project Information Instructions for Completing VILLAGE OF RYE BROOKBUILDING DEPARTMENT Part 1—Project Information. The applicant or project sponsor is responsible for the completion of Part 1. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding,are subject to public review, and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item,please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information. Complete all items in Part 1.You may also provide any additional information which you believe will be needed by or useful to the lead agency;attach additional pages as necessary to supplement any item. Part 1—Project and Sponsor Information Name of Action or Project: 900 King Street Building Demolition Project Location(describe,and attach a location map): 900 King Street,Village of Rye Brook,NY(See attached Site Location Map) Brief Description of Proposed Action: Removal of an existing office building during the initial phase of demolition and the potential removal of existing driveways,parking areas,curbs, walkways,lighting,etc.during a second phase,if necessary. Name of Applicant or Sponsor: Telephone: 914-694-1090 Steve Ketchabaw C/O 900 King Street Owners,LLC E-Mail: sketchabaw@gcomfort.com Address: 2 Manhattanville Road City/PO: State: Zip Code: Purchase New York 10577 1. Does the proposed action only involve the legislative adoption of a plan,local law,ordinance, NO YES administrative rule,or regulation? If Yes,attach a narrative description of the intent of the proposed action and the environmental resources that ❑ may be affected in the municipality and proceed to Part 2. If no,continue to question 2. 2. Does the proposed action require a permit,approval or funding from any other government Agency? NO YES If Yes,list agency(s)name and permit or approval:VRB Board of Trustees(Site Plan),VRB Planning Board(Wetlands ❑ a and Steep Slopes),NYSDEC(Stormwater General Permit) 3. a.Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? 17.77 acres b.Total acreage to be physically disturbed? 9.50 acres c.Total acreage(project site and any contiguous properties)owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? 17.77 acres 4. Check all land uses that occur on,are adjoining or near the proposed action: 5. ❑Urban ❑ Rural(non-agriculture) ❑ Industrial m Commercial m Residential (suburban) ❑Forest ❑ Agriculture ❑ Aquatic ❑ Other(Specify): m Parkland paue 1 of 5. Is the proposed action, NO YES N/A a. A permitted use under the zoning regulations? ❑ ❑ b. Consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan? ❑ ❑✓ ❑ NO YES 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the predominant character of the existing built or natural landscape? ❑ a 7. Is the site of the proposed action located in,or does it adjoin,a state listed Critical Environmental Area? NO YES If Yes,identify: ❑✓ ❑ NO YES 8. a. Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels? ❑✓ ❑ b. Are public transportation services available at or near the site of the proposed action? ❑✓ ❑ c. Are any pedestrian accommodations or bicycle routes available on or near the site of the proposed ❑ action? 9. Does the proposed action meet or exceed the state energy code requirements? NO YES If the proposed action will exceed requirements,describe design features and technologies: N/A The proposed Action is to demolish an existing office building. Z ❑ 10. Will the proposed action connect to an existing public/private water supply? NO YES If No,describe method for providing potable water: No water will be necessary as no structures are to remain on site 7 ❑ 11. Will the proposed action connect to existing wastewater utilities? NO YES If No,describe method for providing wastewater treatment: ❑✓ ❑ 12. a.Does the project site contain,or is it substantially contiguous to.a building.archaeological site,or district NO YES which is listed on the National or State Register of Historic Places.or that has been determined by the ❑ Commissioner of the NYS Office of Parks,Recreation and Historic Preservation to be eligible for listing on the State Register of Historic Places? b.Is the project site,or any portion of it,located in or adjacent to an area designated as sensitive for ❑ archaeological sites on the NY State Historic Preservation Office(SHPO)archaeological site inventory? 13. a. Does any portion of the site of the proposed action,or lands adjoining the proposed action,contain NO YES wetlands or other waterbodies regulated by a federal,state or local agency? ❑✓ ❑ b.Would the proposed action physically alter,or encroach into,any existing wetland or waterbody? ❑✓ ❑ If Yes,identify the wetland or waterbody and extent of alterations in square feet or acres: 14. Identify the typical habitat types that occur on,or are likely to be found on the project site.Check all that apply: ❑Shoreline ❑ Forest ❑Agricultural/grasslands m Early mid-successional m Wetland ❑ Urban m Suburban 15. Does the site of the proposed action contain any species of animal,or associated habitats,listed by the State or NO YES Federal government as threatened or endangered? ❑ ❑ 16. Is the project site located in the 100-year flood plan? NO YES ❑✓ ❑ 17. Will the proposed action create storm water discharge,either from point or non-point sources? NO YES If Yes, ❑ a. Will storm water discharges flow to adjacent properties? ❑ b. Will storm water discharges be directed to established conveyance systems(runoff and storm drains)? ❑ ❑✓ If Yes,briefly describe: All disturbed areas on site will continue to drain to the existing stormwater basin on site.The stormwater runoff will flow overland under proposed conditions instead overland and conveyed through drain inlets and pipes under existing conditions. 18. Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that would result in the impoundment of water NO YES or other liquids(e.g.,retention pond,waste lagoon,dam)? If Yes,explain the purpose and size of the impoundment: ❑ ❑ 19. Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the location of an active or closed solid waste NO YES management facility? If Yes,describe: a ❑ 20.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the subject of remediation(ongoing or NO YES completed) for hazardous waste? If Yes,describe: ❑ ❑ 55 Hillandale Road(Mercury Contamination-Remediation completed by USEPA in May 2006) I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Applicant/spo o name Anthony P.Nester,RLA C/O JMC,PLLC Date:06/06/2019 Signature: Title:Associate Principal PRINT FORM Page 3 of 3 EAF Mapper Summary Report Wednesday, June 05, 2019 4:38 PM Disclaimer: The EAF Mapper is a screening tool intended to assist Ltd`' project sponsors and reviewing agencies in preparing an environmental assessment form(EAF).Not all questions asked in the EAF are Bland Brook answered by the EAF Mapper.Additional information on any EAF -_- Country Club ;� question can be obtained by consulting the EAF Workbooks. Although the EAF Mapper provides the most up-to-date digital data available to Ra DEC,you may also need to contact local or other data sources in order Q� Rtd� to obtain data not provided by the Mapper.Digital data is not a O substitute for agency determinations. �KA Ctrs„ Monr.d c � lerontis- Fbdg,eRyQ Ind Bioo f Street Rodheder �.hocf 8h School � - soa _ sprwidence - Sams:Esri Garmai,USGS.� ' t _ kitermap,N EMT P,NRC>an.Esn y��� Japan,ME71, r,C {Hone Krxre}; i ih f' t P ri t-►E a Garmin, Kcre k.Esri{ ilendj, C,{ pCulnn6P ,b -4 -�lirrt>�P.INCREMENT CpenStr�oor,trihlut�s he GIS .. P, Can,Esri Japan,METI, the G cineNl , Yc t � .rta(Hc^e Kong;Esri Part 1 /Question 7 [Critical Environmental No Area] Part 1 /Question 12a [National or State No Register of Historic Places or State Eligible Sites] Part 1 /Question 12b [Archeological Sites] No Part 1 /Question 13a [Wetlands or Other No Regulated Waterbodies] Part 1 /Question 15 [Threatened or No Endangered Animal] Part 1 /Question 16 [100 Year Flood Plain] No Part 1 /Question 20 [Remediation Site] Yes Short Environmental Assessment Form - EAF Mapper Summary Report l 4 Zm 5 a E V m � x U n 3 O � N 0 _ z N N n 2 i m LU Q m o W O U o � s7• } U v o d E m N LL U -E O E b> � W S �l'S �� ♦. f�r- � � Q m S J c U U J _ 5 Z S E z t W 0 a 5z Z m= E O •, .< W = W Z >� m� C O •. WN ` 0 W V �g t: W O2 Ed Z -� z� o mg U� O U - T Q W O U O o W = h z_ Y 2 w rn p N U w WE � v E Site Planning Environmental Studies Civil Engineering Entitlements 6 2��9 Landscape Architecture Construction Services VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK;1 Land Surveying 3D Visualization BUILDING DEPARTMENT I Transportation Engineering Laser Scanning TRANSMITTAL Date: 06/06/2019 To: Village of Rye Brook Job No.: 16222 938 King Street Project: 900 King Street Development Rye Brook, New York 10573 900 King Street Village of Rye Brook, NY Attn: Mr. Michael Izzo Enclosed please find five (5) copies of the following: [X] Documents [ ] Article [ ] Check [ ] Tracings Description Revision No./Date On behalf of 900 King Street Owner, LLC we are pleased to submit five (5) copies of the following applications, documents and plans in support of seeking site plan, steep slopes and wetland approval for the demolition of the existing 900 King Street building from the Village Board of Trustees and Village Planning Board: I. Application for Site Plan Approval, dated 06/06/2019 2. Site Plan Submittal Review Checklist, dated 06/06/2019 3. JMC Drawings S-1 "Cover Sheet" 06/06/2019 S-2 "Existing Conditions" 06/06/2019 S-3 "Site Demolition Plan" 06/06/2019 S-4 "Site Restoration Plan" 06/06/2019 S-5 "Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Notes and Details" 06/06/2019 4. NYSDEC Short Environmental Assessment Form, dated 06/06/2019 S. AKRF Wetland Mitigation for Building Demolition Memorandum to the Village of Rye Brook Planning Board, dated 06/06/2019 6. Veneziano and Associates Letter to the Rye Brook Village of Board of Trustees, Dated June 6, 2019 7. Veneziano and Associates Letter to the Rye Brook Village Planning Board, Dated June 6, 2019 8. Application Fee Check and Escrow Account Check. 9. Electronic copy of entire submission package Sent Via: [X] Our Messenger [ ] First Class Mail [X] Overnight [ ] Fax: Copy to: Steve Ketchabaw w/enc. Sincerely Karl Mittermayr w/enc. Peter Feroe w/enc. JMC Mark Miller w/enc. Per: Ri Bohlan der, PE Senior Designer P:\2016\I6222\ADMIN\trKetchabaw 06-06-2019.doc JMC Planning Engineering Landscape Architecture & Land Surveying, PLLC I JMC Site Development Consultants, LLC 120 BEDFORD ROAD I ARMONK, NY 10504 914.273.52251 MAIL@JMCPLLC.COM I JMCPLLC.COM VENEZIANO & ASSOCIATES JUN - 6 2019 COUNSELLORS-AT-LAW 84 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK BUILDING DEPARWENT SUITE 200 ARMONK NEW YORK 10504 TEL (914) 273-1300 ; FAX (914) 273-1303 June 6, 2019 Honorable Paul S. Rosenberg,Mayor Village Board of Trustees,Rye Brook 938 King Street Rye Brook,NY 10573 Re: 900 King Street Site Plan Approval to Demolish Ezistini!Office Buildine Honorable Mayor Rosenberg and Members of the Board of Trustees: As you know, our firm represents the owner of the property located at 900 King Street. The purpose of this letter is to submit to you an application for site plan approval for a two-phase demolition of the existing office building on the site. Your Board is currently reviewing our application for zoning amendments and a PUD concept plan to permit the redevelopment of the site with an age-restricted residential development. Your Board is acting as Lead Agency with respect to the environmental review of the proposal. In that role, you have issued a Positive Declaration and approved a Scoping Outline. You have reviewed our Draft EIS, deemed it complete, and held several public hearings. Your professional staff and consultants are currently reviewing a preliminary Final EIS which has been submitted in response to all of the comments received with respect to the DEIS. Once the FEIS has been accepted as complete, there is a mandatory 10-day waiting period before an Environmental Findings Statement can be approved. Following that waiting period, your Board will be in a position to conclude the zoning and concept plan process. It is anticipated that that will happen sometime this fall. During the public review process of the DEIS, issues were raised and concerns were expressed regarding the impacts of the demolition of the existing office building on Blind Brook High School, especially with respect to the potential noise impacts on the operations of the school. The general consensus has been that it would be best if the demolition could take place during the summer,when school is not in session. However, in order for the demolition to begin by July 15, 2019, a demolition permit would have to be issued prior thereto, ahead of the anticipated date for the adoption of environmental findings for the project as a whole. i VENEZIANO &. ASSOCIATES Honorable Paul S.Rosenberg,Mayor June 6, 2019 j Members of the Board of Trustees Page 2 In order to allow the demolition to take place this summer, with all of the attendant benefits, the environmental review process with respect to the demolition will have to be concluded in advance of the adoption of findings for the overall redevelopment. Based upon discussions with your consultants and professional staff, it has been determined that, in order for the building inspector to issue the demolition permit, site plan approval from your Board, as well as wetlands permit approval and steep slopes permit approval from the Planning Board, will be required. Accordingly, we are submitting our site plan application to your Board and, simultaneously, we are submitting an application to the Planning Board for wetlands and steep slopes permit approvals. Before those approvals can be granted, the environmental review process with respect to those approvals must be concluded. This will require "segmentation" of that limited aspect of the overall proposal from the remainder of the project which has been the subject of the complete environmental review that is still being undertaken. In New York, segmentation of an environmental review is permitted under certain limited circumstances. Attached is a memorandum from our firm discussing the benefits of demolishing the existing office building this summer, the regulations and case law regarding segmentation, and describing a "road map" and legal support for separating the environmental review of the demolition from the overall review of the entire development plan. We are requesting site plan approval for a two-phase demolition on the site. Phase I would be removal of the existing office building and would occur immediately upon receipt of all necessary permits. Also included in Phase I is the complete removal of the western portion of the building slab underneath what is the two-story portion of the building. Phase II of the demolition would be the removal of the eastern portion of the building slab and the removal of the asphalt parking lot, including the associated light fixtures, curbs, etc., and replanting the area with grassy vegetation. Phase II of the demolition would occur within one year of the issuance of the demolition permit,unless another site plan is approved for the site or your Board approves an extension. Your Board is the approval authority for the demolition site plan because the site is greater than 4 acres in size. However, inasmuch as a small portion of the existing office building is located within a wetland buffer and there are steep slopes adjacent to the western portion of the building, we will need wetlands permit approval and steep slopes permit approval from the Planning Board. Submitted herewith is our site plan application package, including the site plan application form, detailed demolition plans, and the application fee. It is respectfully requested that this matter be placed on your agenda for June 10, 2019 for the purpose of receiving the VENEZIANO &. ASSOCIATES I I Honorable Paul S.Rosenberg,Mayor June 6,2019 Members of the Board of Trustees Page 3 I application and scheduling the required public hearing for your meeting on June 27, 2019 and possible referral of the application to the Planning Board for a report and recommendation. It is also respectfully requested that, on June 10, 2019, you declare your intent to segment the review of the demolition site plan from the remainder of the project. The actual segmentation, and the conclusion of the environmental review with respect to the demolition, would take place prior to your decision on the demolition site plan. We look forward to discussing this matter at your meeting on June 10, 2019. Thank you for your courtesy and cooperation. Very truly yours, VENEZI & S IATES--- By: Mark P.Miller MPM/kj Encl. cc: Christopher Bradbury,Village Administrator Edward Beane,Esq. Jennifer Gray,Esq. Marilyn Timpone Mohamed Anthony Oliveri,P.E. i Veneziano & Associates 84 Business Park Drive,Suite 200 Armonk,New York 10504 Teh(914)273 1300 Fax:(914)2731303 Memorandum To: Board of Trustees Village of Rye Brook Cc: Edward Beane,Esq. Jennifer Gray,Esq. From: Mark P.Miller,Esq. Date: June 5,2019 Re: 900 King Street Segmentation of Demolition I. INTRODUCTION The plan for the redevelopment of 900 King Street is currently being reviewed by the Board of Trustees of the Village of Rye Brook. Toward that end, the Applicant has submitted a zoning petition and a PUD Concept Plan. The Board,acting as lead agency,issued a positive declaration and approved a scoping outline. The Applicant prepared and submitted a Draft EIS, which was deemed complete and was the subject of several public hearings,following the closure of which a written comment period was established. Based upon all of the comments received during the public process, the Applicant has prepared a preliminary Final EIS which is currently being reviewed by the Village for completeness. It is anticipated that that review will take several weeks,following which there will be a mandatory 10-day waiting period before environmental findings can be drafted, analyzed, revised, and adopted. Votes of this sort, including the Environmental Findings Statement and rezoning,rarely occur in August,a vacation month. At this time,it is most likely that findings will be adopted in the fall. As part of the redevelopment plan,the existing office building will be demolished. In fact, the demolition of the existing building will take place regardless of the ultimate plan approved by the Board of Trustees. The building is not easily modified to a multi-tenant building. The DEIS stated that"it is the Applicant's opinion that re-use of the existing office building is not viable." 1 1 , During the public review process of the DEIS, issues were raised and concerns were expressed regarding the impacts of the demolition on Blind Brook High School, which is located across Arbor Drive from the 900 King Street property,especially with respect to the potential noise i impacts to the operations of the School. The general consensus is that it would be best if the demolition could take place during the summer,when school is not in session. However,in order for the demolition to begin by July 15, 2019, a demolition permit would have to be issued prior thereto, ahead of the anticipated date for the adoption of environmental findings for the project as a whole. In order to allow the demolition to take place this summer,with all of the attendant benefits, the environmental review process with respect to the demolition will have to be concluded in advance of the adoption of findings for the overall redevelopment. The purpose of this memorandum is to address that issue,and provide a roadmap and legal support for separating the environmental review of the demolition from the overall review of the entire redevelopment plan. Such review is no less protective of the environment, taking a comprehensive look at the impacts associated with demolition, and would serve to advance an j action(i.e.,demolition)that has independent utility. H. SEGMENTATION—REGULATORY FRAMEVI'O RK The goal of SEQRA is to provide municipal boards with sufficient environmental information during the zoning entitlement process such that they can make an informed decision with respect to any given action. SEQRA requires a comprehensive, cumulative, worst case analysis of an"action"such that impacts can be identified, avoided, or mitigated to the maximum extent practicable. If a proposal contains various independent components,those are addressed in a single environmental review. In this case,inasmuch as the goal is to demolish the existing office building and redevelop the site with the age-restricted uses described in the various submittals,the standard course would be to review both of those matters together. However, the environmental review of the redevelopment proposal cannot be completed in time to permit the demolition of the existing building during this summer,when school is not is session. The timing of the demolition is an important consideration of the Village, the School District, and the Applicant. Taking the building down and removing the debris while there is minimal school activity can be viewed, in and of itself as mitigation of potential impacts. Accordingly, the objective is to segment the demolition approval from the remainder of the redevelopment proposal in order to be in a position to allow a demolition permit to be issued such that the demolition can take place this summer. No activity on the site associated with the current preferred plan,or any of the alternatives thereto,could be commenced absent the adoption by the Village Board of an Environmental Findings Statement, the rezoning of the site by the Village Board, adoption of the PUD Concept Plan, and site plan approval being granted followed by the issuance of building permit(s). The separation of the demolition from the residential development falls under the concept of "segmentation." The SEQRA regulations are designed to avoid segmentation wherever possible. The SEQRA regulations define segmentation as: 2 i "...the division of the environmental review of an action such that various activities or stages are addressed under this Part as though they were independent, unrelated activities, needing individual ! determinations of significance." 6 NYCRR 617.2(ag). i The SEQRA regulations further discuss segmentation as follows: "Actions commonly consist of a set of activities or steps. The entire set of activities or steps must be considered the action, whether the agency decision-making relates to the action as a whole or to only a part of it. (1) considering only a part or segment of an action is contrary to the intent of SEQR. If a lead agency believes that circumstances warrant a segmented review, it must clearly state in its determination of significance, and any subsequent EIS, the supporting reasons and must demonstrate that such review is clearly no less protective of the environment. Related actions should be identified and discussed to the fullest extent possible." 6 NYCRR 617.3(g). Notwithstanding the fact that the SEQRA regulations clearly favor a non-segmented review, the regulations nevertheless provide for a segmented review under certain circumstances. As noted above, in order to conduct a segmented review, the lead agency must believe that it is warranted under the circumstances, the lead agency must clearly state its reasons therefor, and it must demonstrate that the segmented review is no less protective of the environment. Based upon case law interpreting the SEQRA regulations, discussed below,we believe that segmenting the review such that the demolition is approved after the issuance of a negative declaration relating only to the demolition process, with the Lead Agency completing a more substantial EIS review of the residential development, is proper. III. CASE LAW AND DISCUSSION Initially, it must be noted that this case differs somewhat from the typical fact pattern in segmentation cases. In most segmentation cases, one aspect of a project is the subject of an environmental review, followed by a separate aspect of the project being reviewed at a later time. This case presents a situation in. which an entire project, including demolition of an existing building and subsequent residential redevelopment of the site, is the subject of a complete environmental review process(positive declaration,DEIS,and FEIS)but one aspect of the overall project, i.e., the demolition, is segmented from the remainder of the project prior to the adoption of environmental findings so that the demolition can take place in a timely fashion when the nearby school is not in session and the impacts of the demolition on the school are minimized, if not eliminated altogether. Nevertheless, the rationale of the segmentation cases is completely applicable to this matter. The leading case in this area of law is Concerned Citizens for the Environment v. Zagata, 243 AD2d 20(3`d Dept. 1998). In that case, an applicant proposed to develop an integrated solid 3 i waste management facility,consisting of an incinerator,a materials recovery facility,and a transfer station. The applicant applied to DEC,the permitting authority,for a permit to construct only the transfer station. DEC granted the request for a segmented review, and required the applicant to undergo a complete environmental process including a DEIS and an FEIS. DEC ultimately issued the permit for the transfer station and an Article 78 proceeding was commenced by an environmental citizens group. The lawsuit alleged that DEC improperly segmented the review of the transfer station from that of the integrated facility. In upholding the segmented review by DEC,the Appellate Division discussed the potential "dangers"of a segmented review as follows: "...the reasons for disfavoring segmentation are twofold. First is the danger that in considering related actions separately, a decision involving review of an earlier action may be `practically determinative' of a subsequent action (Matter of Tri-County Taxpayers Assn. v Town Bd., 55 NY2d 41,46). The second danger occurs when a project that would have a significant effect on the environment is broken up into two or more component parts that, individually, would not have as significant an environmental impact as the entire project or, indeed, where one or more aspects of the project might fall below the threshold requiring any review (see, Matter of Schultz v Jorling. 164 AD2d 252, 255-256. by denied 77 NY2d 810)."Concerned Citizens at 22. In addressing the first concern, the Appellate Division noted "that the transfer station is wholly independent of the materials recovery facility and the incinerator and, further, that the former has utility regardless of whether the balance of the project is ever approved and constructed."Concerned Citizens at 23. With respect to 900 King Street,the demolition of the existing office building has`Utility" regardless of whatever final development plan may ultimately be approved. As noted above, the DEIS stated that "it is the Applicant's opinion that re-use of the existing office building is not viable." As stated in the 5/14/2019 preliminary FEIS submitted to the Village, "The Applicant, as well as predecessors in interest, unsuccessfully attempted to lease the existing office building for a variety of uses to a variety of tenants. These efforts were not successful in producing sufficient building occupancy or long-term tenancy to make operating the building profitable. One reason contributing to the inability to lease the existing Site is the building's relatively large floorplate broken up by twin atriums.The large,rectangular, floorplate makes it inefficient to subdivide the space while providing for the necessary means of egress for each tenant. As a result,buildings with more efficient floorplates, such as 4 i i i the buildings at 1100 King Street,which utilize a single core are more easily adapted for multiple tenants and have had more success in re-tenanting existing space." i i As such, allowing the demolition to proceed is not in any way `practically determinative" of a particular redevelopment scenario for the Site;rather the demolition would be done in recognition that the re-tenanting of the existing office building is not viable. The second concern expressed by the Court in Concerned Citizens is also absent. In the present case, the entire project, including the demolition of the existing building and the redevelopment plan for the property,has been considered together, and has been the subject of a full environmental review, including a DEIS and an FEiS. As such, the Village has received significantly more information and detail about the demolition than it would have received if the demolition permit had been considered initially and separately from the overall development plan. Specifically,the potential impacts of demolishing the existing office building have been analyzed and measures to avoid those potential adverse impacts have been identified and have been included in the demolition plans for the existing building. These are the same measures that would be implemented during demolition if demolition were delayed until the adoption of the Findings Statement. As stated in the DEIS and the pFEIS,these measures would include: • Conducting a survey of the building for asbestos-containing-materials(ACM).This survey has been completed and shared with the Village and a plan for removing the minimal amount of ACM identified has been developed and is the subject of a current permit application. • Construction fencing would be installed to ensure safety from construction activities. • Appropriate erosion and sediment controls would be implemented, where necessary. • During the demolition process, debris and any disturbed earth would be wet down with water, if necessary, to control dust. Disturbed areas would be stabilized to minimize the potential for sediment laden runoff. • All construction equipment, materials, deliveries, and worker parking would be accommodated on-Site. No construction equipment, truck, material, or worker parking, queuing,or staging would be permitted on Arbor Drive. • Fully loaded trucks would utilize truck covers/tarp rollers to keep debris and dust from being expelled. • Construction equipment would utilize ultra-low sulfur diesel to minimize emissions. • Idling of construction equipment would not be allowed when the equipment is not in active use. • Non-road diesel engines with a power rating of 50 hp or greater would utilize Best Available Tailpipe (BAT) Reduction Technologies for reducing diesel particulate emissions. Specifically,such equipment would utilize diesel particulate filters(DPFs). • A vibration monitoring program would be implemented to monitor vibration at the Arbors community and the Tennessee Gas Pipeline during demolition to ensure that vibration levels do not exceed thresholds that could potentially result in damage during construction. Not only has the Village received more information than it otherwise would have regarding the demolition, but the overall development project is still the subject of a complete environmental 5 i i review and cannot proceed until the Board of Trustees has adopted a Statement of Findings. Indeed, segmenting the demolition at this time actually provides additional mitigation for the impacts of the demolition, by permitting same to take place while school is not in session. Accordingly, segmenting the demolition permit at this time is no less protective of the environment. IV. CONCLUSION Based upon the foregoing, it is respectfully submitted that a segmented review of the demolition permit is warranted and is consistent with the mandates of the SEQRA Regulations. 6 ZAKP& EJUN6 2019 Environmental, Planning, and Engineering Consultants VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK 34 South Broadway BUILDING DEPARTPIENT Suite 401 White Plains, NY 10601 tel: 914 949-7336 fax: 914 949-7559 www.akl,f.com Memorandum To: Village of Rye Brook Planning Board From: Peter Feroe,AICP Date: June 6,2019 Re: 900 King: Wetland Mitigation for Building Demolition INTRODUCTION In accordance with Chapter 245 of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook,this memo provides information on the current conditions of the wetlands, surface water features, and their regulated buffers on the 900 King Street property(the"Site")as well as describes the potential impacts of Site demolition(the"Project") on those regulated features and the mitigation proposed for those potential impacts. It is the Applicant's intent that this memorandum be included as part of the Applicant's wetland permit and wetland mitigation plan. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Applicant is requesting Site Plan approval from the Board of Trustees for a two-phase demolition on the Site. The first phase ("Phase I") would be removal of the existing office building and would occur immediately upon receipt of all necessary permits.Also included in Phase 1 is the complete removal of the western portion of the building`slab'underneath what is the 2-story portion of the building,which is closest to Wetland A,and vegetating this area with a grassy vegetation to match the surrounding area.As discussed below, a small portion of this building is within 100-feet of Wetland A. The area formerly within the footprint of the building where it transitions from 3-stories to 2-stories(i.e.,where the building`goes into' the slope),would be filled/graded and revegetated to match the existing grade exterior to the building.This area is outside of the wetland buffer.The second phase("Phase 2")of the demolition would be the removal of the eastern portion of the building `slab,' which is located at the same elevation as the existing parking lot.Also included in Phase 2 is the removal of the asphalt parking lot,including the associated light fixtures, curbs,etc.,and replanting the area with grassy vegetation. As discussed below,a portion of the parking lot is within 100-feet of Wetland B and another portion is within 100-feet of Wetland D. Phase 2 of the Site Plan would occur within one year of the completion of Phase 1,unless another Site Plan is approved for the Site or the Board of Trustees approves an extension. Offices in New York • New Jersey 9 Pennsylvania • Maryland •Ohio Rye Brook Planning Board 2 June 6,2019 CURRENT CONDITIONS The information with respect to the existing conditions of the wetlands, waterbodies, and wetland buffers on the Site is based on the September 12,2018 Draft Environmental Impact Statement(DEIS) for the 900 King Street redevelopment,which is incorporated herein by reference. Wetlands Five wetlands meeting the three requirements for wetland identification were located on the Project Site based on wetland investigations and delineations performed in accordance with federal and Village standards (see DEIS Appendix D-2 for wetland delineation). The on-Site wetlands and/or streams are created and sustained by untreated stormwater runoff from the adjacent Hutchinson River Parkway (the "Parkway") or by stormwater from impervious surfaces conveyed from Village Hall, Rye Brook Police Department (RBPD), and Rye Brook Fire Department (RBFD), and the Project Site. The wetlands are of comparatively low ecological value, dominated by a limited number of common plant species, and are stressed by untreated stormwater runoff hydrology inputs of short duration. Nevertheless, they do serve some habitat and modification of surface water quality functions(see DEIS Appendix D-5 for a functional assessment of the wetlands). The wetland and watercourse buffers within the Project Site are currently encroached upon by on-Site and off-Site developments, including parking lots, roads, buildings, and manicured lawns. Wetland A (0.159 acres on-Site), located at the western side of the Site, is a forested wetland dominated by American sycamore (Platanus occidentalis) and poison ivy (Toxicodendron radicans). Wetland B (0.001 acres on-Site), located at the northwestern side of the Site, is predominantly an emergent wetland dominated by common reed (Phragmites australis), with a woodland fringe dominated by silver maple (Acer saccharinum) and poison ivy. The emergent portion of this wetland is located almost entirely off-Site. Wetland C(0.006 acres on-Site),located within the northern portion of the Site,is a small forested wetland dominated by silver maple and green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica), poison ivy, and bishop's goutweed(Aegopodium podagraria). Wetland D (0.185 acres on-Site), located at the eastern side of the Site, is an emergent wetland created as a stormwater basin to handle runoff from the existing Project Site and adjacent Village Hall,RBPD,and RBFD properties.It is dominated by common reed. Wetland E(0.015 acres on-Site)is a small forested wetland located in the far northern comer of the Site and continues northwest off-Site. Wetland E is dominated by green ash, silver maple,tatarian honeysuckle (Lonicera tatarica), and European privet (Ligustrum vulgare). This wetland demonstrates a high level of disturbance and fill. Surface Waters Surface water investigations identified two streams located on-Site. Stream A is associated with Wetland A, and runs southeast across the lawn in the southern corner of the Site and continues under Arbor Drive via a culvert. Stream S is associated with Wetland D (e.g., the stormwater management basin), receiving flow via a culvert, flowing southeast through a vegetated meandering channel, and under Arbor Drive via a culvert. There are no principal or sole source aquifers within the Site. Rye Brook Planning Board 3 June 6,2019 Wetland and Watercourse Buffers The Village regulates a buffer area of 100 feet around a wetland or watercourse edge.' Vegetated wetland buffers can protect wetland functions by encouraging stormwater infiltration, improving wetland water quality,and providing plant and/or animal habitat. Development(e.g., clearing/paving)of wetland buffers eliminates their wetland protective functions to the detriment of wetland functions. The wetland and watercourse buffers within the Project Site are currently encroached upon by on-Site and off-Site developments, including impervious areas, buildings, and manicured lawns. The 100-foot wetland buffer surrounding Wetland A is currently encroached upon on its northern edge by the on-Site office building and at two points on its southern edge by The Arbors townhomes. The buffer of Wetland D is occupied primarily by the on-Site parking lot and off-Site Village Hall, RBPD, and RBFD parking lot. The buffers of Wetlands B,C,and E are occupied on their north sides by the Hutchinson River Parkway. As shown in Table 1, in total there is approximately 0.807 acres of existing impervious surface within the on-Site wetland buffer areas. Table 1 Current Condition of On-Site Wetland Buffers Existing Buffer Area Existing On-Site Impervious acres Coverage in Buffer acres ' Wetland A/Stream A 2.363 0.025 Wetland B 0.389 0.101 Wetland C 0.504 0.000 Wetland D/Stream S 1.444 0.681 Wetland E 0.248 0.000 Total 4.948 0.807 Note: There is additional impervious area within the 100-foot buffer that is located on adjacent parcels. ource: JMC Engineering IMPACTS OF SITE DEMOLITION Potential Impacts of the Project to Wetlands and Wetland Buffers There would be no direct or indirect adverse impacts to the Site's wetlands or surface water features from the Project. Approximately 0.025 acres of the northwest corner of the existing office building is within 100-feet of Wetland A. Phase 1 would remove the building in its entirety. The area within the footprint of the western side of the building (i.e., the 2-story portion of the building `up' the hill) would be vegetated upon the building's removal.As a result,Phase 1 would result in the conversion of 0.025 acres of impervious surface within the Wetland A buffer to vegetated, permeable habitat. In the Applicant's opinion, this would be a beneficial impact to the Site's wetland buffers. Phase 2, would remove the remaining portion of the building slab and the entire asphalt parking lot. Approximately 0.782 acres of concrete and asphalt within the existing parking lot are located within 100- feet of on-Site wetlands and waterbodies.After removal of the building slab and parking lot,the area would be revegetated with grassy vegetation to match the surrounding vegetation. In the Applicant's opinion, removing 0.782 acres of existing impervious surfaces (e.g., parking lot) within the Site's wetland buffers would be a beneficial impact to the Site's wetland buffers. ' Village Code.Chapter 245,Wetlands and Watercourses. e D Rye Brook Planning Board 4 June 6,2019 In the Applicant's opinion,there would be no adverse impacts to the Site's wetland buffers from the Project. Rather,the Project would have a beneficial impact to the Site's wetland buffers in that on-Site impervious surfaces within the wetland buffers would be removed and restored to a permeable and vegetated condition. Compliance with Village Wetland Ordinance Section 245-8(A) of the Village Code states that the following factors should be considered to determine "the impact of the proposed activity upon public health, safety and welfare, flora and fauna, rare and endangered species,water quality,and additional wetland functions." • Wetland hydrology:The Project would avoid interference with existing wetland hydrology and wetland water circulation. The Site's five wetlands occur around the periphery of the Project Site; therefore, removal of the impervious areas within the interior of the Site would not substantially change wetland water circulation or hydrologic inputs to the Site's wetlands. • Wetland flora and fauna: By avoiding direct disturbance to all wetlands, impacts to wetland flora and fauna are avoided.In fact,by removing impervious areas(e.g.,building and parking lot)and replacing them with vegetation, the Project would increase the on-Site habitat and reduce stresses to the Site's existing wetland flora and fauna. • Endangered species: There are no New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC)-listed or federally listed threatened, endangered, rare, or special concern plant or animal species on the Project Site(see DEIS Chapter 7). • Public health, safety, and welfare: Wetland functions would be retained on the Project Site for the benefit of public health, safety, and welfare. This would be achieved by reducing or eliminating impervious surface coverage within the Site's wetland buffers. • Sedimentation and turbidity: The Project would prevent the influx of sediments and other pollutants to the Site's wetlands and waters during Site demolition through the implementation of the Erosion and Sediment Control Plan,which is subject to review and approval by the Village's Engineer. • Influx of toxic chemicals or thermal changes: The Project would avoid the release of toxic or heavy metals through the implementation of the Erosion and Sediment Control Plan,which is subject to review and approval by the Village's Engineer construction of the proposed stormwater management system. • Cumulative effects: The cumulative effects of the Project would not affect or jeopardize off- Site/downstream wetlands because the Project would be removing impervious surfaces within the Site's wetland buffers,as well as reducing the impervious coverage on the Site in totality. WETLAND BUFFER NIITIGATION Wetland Buffer Mitigation Plan As described below,the Applicant respectfully disagrees with the historical interpretation of the Village's Wetland Ordinance with respect to the actions that require wetland buffer mitigation. Nevertheless, the Applicant has included a mitigation plan that would be implemented, if required by the Planning Board, that satisfies the Planning Board's historical interpretation that any action,including an action that consists only of the removal of impervious surfaces within a wetland buffer and the conversion of those areas to a permeable and vegetated condition,be mitigated at a ratio of 2 to 1. The Project would result in an impact to approximately 0.807 acres within 100-feet of on-Site wetlands. Using the Planning Board's historical interpretation of the Wetland Ordinance, this action would require 1.64 acres of wetland buffer mitigation.The Applicant proposes to accomplish the required mitigation by improving 1.75 acres of off-Site wetland buffer areas as identified and approved by the Superintendent of Rye Brook Planning Board 5 June 6,2019 Public Works. As described by the Superintendent of Public Works, the off-Site improvements could include locations within Rich Manor Park or the Edgewood Detention Basin. Within these areas, the Applicant would improve the current wetland buffer functions, including through the removal of invasive species and debris, and potentially the select planting of appropriate vegetation. The work would be completed at the direction of, and to the satisfaction of,the Superintendent of Public Works. The Applicant proposes off-Site mitigation so as to limit the physical disturbance within the Project Site. On-Site mitigation within the Site's wetland buffers would require extensive regrading and temporary impacts to up to 1.75 acres of currently vegetated areas (e.g., lawn and wooded areas). This physical disturbance and vegetation removal would not occur but for the mitigation. In contrast, the Applicant's proposed off-Site wetland mitigation plan would not require regrading;rather,the off-Site mitigation would include the removal of invasive species and the select replanting of native, wetland facultative species within targeted areas identified by the Village. In this way, existing, underperforming areas of wetland buffer could be restored to a more ecologically beneficial function while resulting in limited,if any,physical disturbance. The Applicant's wetland mitigation plan would be implemented during Phase 2 of the Site Plan, unless another Site Plan,wetland permit,and wetland mitigation plan for the Site are approved in the interim.Any wetland mitigation plan associated with a subsequent Site Plan and wetland permit would appropriately account for the disturbance to the wetland buffer resulting from the implementation of any phase completed as part of the current site plan application. That is to say, a wetland buffer mitigation plan approved for a future development of the Site would appropriately account for the impacts of any demolition that is completed as part of this application. Applicant's Interpretation of Village's Wetland Buffer Ordinance The Village's Wetland Ordinance requires that"losses to wetland/watercourse buffers"be mitigated"by a ratio of at least two to one for the area of wetland/watercourse buffer disturbed that replace or enhance the functions of the wetland/watercourse buffer" (Section 245-9A(3)) (emphasis added). Projects, or portions thereof,that unquestionably improve the ecological function of a wetland buffer by converting impervious surfaces (e.g., buildings and pavement) to permeable surfaces (e.g., landscaped habitat) should not be required to mitigate that action. The reason for this is that the action is the mitigation—the removal of impervious surfaces. The Applicant continues to contend that impacts to areas of a wetland buffer that currently provide no beneficial wetland buffer function, such as buildings and parking lots, should not be considered either a "loss"or"disturbance"to the wetland buffer pursuant to the language of the Village's Wetlands Ordinance. As required by Section 245-3 of the Village Code,words not specifically defined by the Wetland Ordinance should be "interpreted so as to give [the Wetlands chapter of the Village Code] its most reasonable application in carrying out the regulatory goals"(emphasis added).As impervious areas(e.g.,buildings and parking lots)provide no wetland buffer function,removing those buildings or parking lots cannot diminish the overall functionality of the wetland buffer and therefore cannot be considered a"loss"to wetland buffer functionality. Further, in the Applicant's opinion,the word"disturbed" should be interpreted in this context to mean an adverse impact to a wetland buffer—an impact that would degrade a wetland buffer's functionality. This would be consistent with advancing the goals of the Wetland Ordinance—reducing harm to,and improving the functions of, wetlands and wetland buffers. As an example, the Wetland Ordinance would not require "mitigation" for projects whose only intention was to improve a wetland or wetland buffer. This interpretation is consistent with the Oxford Dictionaries' definition of the word"disturbed"as"having had its normal pattern or function disrupted." As such, the Applicant contends that, pursuant to the Village's existing regulations, the Project, which consists in its entirety of the removal of impervious surfaces—building and parking lots—and the replacement of those surfaces with permeable vegetated habitat, does not create a `loss' to, or otherwise `disturb,' the`function of the wetland buffer' and should not require wetland buffer mitigation. - - - to w s* i" �, r s• N AIR dlf� A 11 A $ fit, A x5mj AAIX voj�j=; 28§?-s Ag §jw A ; g r_r te _ � Q jQ�z ZQ�" LLy $jay �lpy �! s�� "'I ■ - �—� g g< o a y Few p > �' I �g RIM! A�iAl Z �Q/gim XO���$O �7 ��{i(� � r \ � ; �� $ i �_1 �j \.. � ■ y " 1�> n �t�f m XAR w w �°18�g-v( 3�.. JS - �( 1\t N I .... C oS IP A O Q �p{1y�{� < Iml o�QpA ,� r� RAI sa 8 ��n ? a a $ a a a a a a in l� >f � f_� �� J!, AAA 5 8 � pa y -1Ny s4 �� t t p G j A Z A r < N • yyQ� tG ■ o, ,� L'1d fill �c+o N N >ri Y Ci �■ 14 9= Z>> > Ci f O �.I m l il rid A s?-I 0WH � < 9 A I k `� � 9 a. cp L2 '3 9 _ + � a Q " _ iy x � f�1 Q � �i m e� Af • L " ii a 9 Nye ■ �1 �1 y {�O �LS a0i> �y "'jv�i �(• m 51= vA BA AIR py [y� 11y{ \� \ ♦ °�� . �,` � •`, � ` `, .. � � Q � ` .d' \ �`'� �: IS I5 IS Is � � � � x � iy ?1 � to � a sr AIR 2 tt♦ \ \ ` \ I IS s . N i ■ FI R a o Fi Tn IP N�` Ff '^ "' SZf=, v o��_y� 1� � �� �S��� � 1�IXIRS■ � � �� Q� i � agx s `A ingg\\\$_C gs1[Cf�5��11f� _ own � �N A � �r 'ARAI t���=Q g"1 �_ � � � �� 2 " A� " � 9 N \ \ , \ \ \ \ \ _ P"! �C1 S i s F�,tL� e" >ii �J�L tyt , >tt jji� Y Y•y N� ql NA �> _ >� S Z �l.Zf >f'1 Amp egg �C a dull I Qyl pA�"y<� Z A� �P1Y��ou�ipIPA o�yj�(�j� jjjN(B�C mQ■ IN L x8ws+ i-�lit 87;88 m r.i QQ N C�i�y S ��<< A � �y;f �Qlag Q p4::.900\iodi �gig �+..7 �, p� " � Yfjj l� lit 1, ����� < >> F; �5 YAi FtJ < j 4 •i Y f•llj,�./".L "x 70 " to f�fr7 I��l ' ��+ \` ' 8 i° s 2 p MISI 1j !� �.�. ; �j�}iQj((//�11Q �Iny� n�1J�� i S ..� `1 `~+� ; I 1 �' I ..• „`„y ` �` \ � >. O > j ` � ��1� > yY'��m 19 � y111 1 ` -;'j gim IP 'i i1,, wf / `w SN ' p I -.- i �. nr %\.,�, -r, \' iE _ .�j Z � . � g Q Z y m'�• O K Rig w x`4/fiat' �f s oQe . P• >� a �flV �:i Q�i p'� � ' J$ i'p n1�� Q �� Sd A g ;Kf171 f 9 0(10 - "i7f �r�Z > � • y� E �"In \ i+' yL�Z 7��5Q ^' Q�y� r7 Nis, �> S f^^' F .I "' M1 pA� Wy =Z �L1�S. 1�y.$.,y x _ •y f9 -� 1 pr p �� O> yQ9 a Xt'R ^� > { y m 1" �G $p� y9� .� •t1i'11' � "� \ -if- `\S - �\ � \ -` 'r'� � � � I �.� I i IN O O ----- I to \ • 1 { / S ---- \;`1y% `\�'• _ r• � ■w % \ \\ �� ,n+i r. t � / i i i Y/ ~`\ \\!\\�` 11 i •` �ti`` \•♦ `\ tl _ x1� S \ wp_\ \ i* \ li g ° \ • N. y ,� "t �\ r \ \ •`\ �*\ ♦ `\ Ilt" S ti `` Q^' ` ti ■ 4 w '/^�J\ \ % \ �•' �`\♦ j \` \ i � f • r '''� '' -' `, `tt` 1 ,L I 'j �I � \ � °j \`` r \Q� a' * • w `\, g r � l ~ � \ !� Q-\ >R 6 \\ \ �• i I `\\ I } \ it X $' - tii \� N \ g \ • •` �, ', i `�' `t \`` Lt i � `\ \ ,\ `t ; �' t `, I� • Q ///�---.�•,,..\, �'� � C+ • `\� \ �X \`L \ \' � X � / \ r � �yX � ( i � \ `i � _X 4 / WNP O 14 L A ir ''�' •\\\ � �X .\ y F4 IF '`\ i / � V ; , '� �.\ 1j7V IR }R ,\�� C / , �♦ M % \ V! 1 •e `["`.� C O I i w / tV\1 i`•`L ,L\ ` Ll•. ,` I Mom. n I/ �, ` 'a p, \ , y��` „ \ X ,yx N_• t f# i \ ,og N i D t POO try o o ,�. .�•.�1 i R lit D ' I O ■ N tY {,� i i 1 r- ____ ' Lu -_�___ `\.\ •.\\ `tv� 11 \ �� Y" �\ � / ��' �r�` � \\\ \\ / � •.j7ZLl j t 1/ ♦` ' \ i 0� 1 1 ;1x / •• �'a:f \\\\ y m it `\ ` l; ` \ \ \ \\ \ ` I 4 i `\ N, - ­// - > 2 Ir en 5d Z of / \ I� `•i S \ �p / 400 f L ' I i I ~� '• ti b / i a O I 1 I , r co f F i 1 f 1 1 I 1 + 1 I ' r / ' ; I � I r 1 / r 1 1 , 1 i , I + \ � . I` ♦ram •- . � u . ...-_�! � 1 � . SLOWiI /�� � . `�'?�E ; •���::, i, c� ���� qr.'s '' - A 0� rpMop ,,,• o � � i f �`�� � -szwow :.;III,. ✓ / f� .� �� � � w� � •�� t, �'� -� � � 7f�::�►, , � 01 ,\•��o �= *;. . ` 'Its JMC Planning. Engineeriny. Landscape ' BUILDING ` Architecture & Lind Surveying. PLLC 900 KING STREET OWNER LLC -_ JMC Site Development Consultants. LLC 1 1 • • • -_ - - ` - DEMOLITION •• John Meyer Consulting. Inc. NEW • - NY 10016 -_ • ' • 120 BEDFORD ROAD • ARMONK. NY 10504 PERKINS -_ PC • t+ voice 914.273.5225 • fax 914.273.2102 == VILLAGE OF BROOK. www.jmcpllc.coln • _ �422 SUMMER .EET • . _ i,.•: -_ �+ P fn + S. N � P o p• .1 P' f" � ♦ � w Y N v x� rn c x � -, y a r281--JQ� Imp A��Ip Qg l xqe 11ps Alp 55i g $ARC g2JA51A AgpgAl sA A s§ fgp us s lipb2� RE_� 8 *2 1 1 � y �a "RIB 1011�� a �o a a� ��� il: Cif CS1 y� }��y Q�tif C 1 Q8 t5 0 >Niaa� >�r N -4 �� ear14 ��� , ';t g o+41 � �mt� >: � jai 0�� � 4 �� ('y� n� j(� tog ga AIR 9 �mR Ai t ~ Y �pS n,� 0 An y pS p 8 p I�1 � � C �$V CL/1 �� J�L $NZrNly9�FfnVIO Z Ajj�4y A R F O911 a $ g c > v� �� 1F FJ>„ � c>c 8Q8Q ,,, �Qc 17i i� , u'Icffn25 KNpp~ YC Ig ~SIQ Z m ���8 �Rog g lf��C n� �Nggw N N Vf AE as al Raux ysaj ix A54 g 8 vi p y I� SO �ii > > >j m l'jQ.� > Y N 1 _ Q� �♦� y O aIffli�a _ t 5a F O O $ S : , i & q 9 �A 1IR-40109 �� liig �a � � TiJ Ln MAX, �c a� � '� �0�� PO ,p;081 � gig m Mfn jR, i IQ go A 1; R.p L2 MA 4 9 `T ra lii ,p A � m Now +pt h N I$ S •' � Z f'1 • G ly ='1 a > � L � M 23 In S Sd ��N Iyy> _ mp a li,� _ �f a CC''JJ PI GG yj s� N iRgcw2 C A 4 -P gpug ME o�y $ ��qqKai a "Nag, LrKIRRIS gipg 129119 1 Aw A. gAhg log g 91109 R}84 ag �8 3 € �^p RI p � � � 00RO§1 ~N� %A t IL .__..-__"' •� `\ It a 4 ? la _$ Cm O 2 !RAS ! 2 Ay�1L xxv Ojj�1jJ1 \\•r a ��, ��.x� 2s��s� LP \` tll{ 4-", ", �'♦ \,t ,�•; flt �._l'V `,�♦ _.,� >� �� � � �g� :� �� � � � s� � p �qq isa�>� �� �� y� � �g �� 1 { \ a.\ ,''` .. . \.,\ `t • j � � i i I ° ;y � ~ s N S � � � � N u7 r.� A � � �7Z1 3 1,0 �` ` II i 81 :( > fi nap A A °t° ,� LnQ wh y, '1 �• Tn / � { / ��\` , , �\ ••. % ` I � t l II ky ` i ti � � � N � � p op � � � � �,y1 p yy�t mm fyl •i 1Qaj ~ T- z 1 � S > �Z � j �y,xi \ \ / ' `\ \ ` / / \ \ •\: t t ;{�y 1�y^ m O jjgq A ;� C g N ~ a /�1S�qWOW Z�,i ^HAN �yQ 1� �jNi yj�� • C Mal yy ,9�L> ii N �� S �t� �7� � 0�_> , tt\ • \` --`_j' /� /' -.•\ ;'t, It tl{ \\ I + ' ,�' sk II �a •N /��$ / > r � `ff \ tt tl 1 y f i \ � } � •L N Q v � � � , t -..�/� `� ,. � w � '� r , t N~ ~ 1 tgtt i i 1Ut `1x \y u I r 10 it r \ ti - '�\ ' \ \\\I 1 5{ Ij ` � t `~"�"""•�.. � �1I` � �\�\\\ N q i i F O J 1 1 xJr � 17-1 Oe� DEMOLITION, GRADING AND EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN g a 900 KING STREET REDEVELOPMENT 900 KING STREET VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK. NY Z bt r a i 1 c �t2 k \ r t R r e % rA �► ems' 4 Ate►; ��''� •` 4 Lal Il III APPLICANT/OWNER 900 KING STREET OWNER LLC 200 MADISON AVENUE, 26TH FLOOR NEW YORK, NY 10016 No. Revision Date By ARCHITECT PERKINS EASTMAN ARCHITECTS, PC 422 SUMMER STREET STAMFORD, CT 06901 RekvsEdidaasolbsdele DEMOLITION SITE PLANS 900 KING STREET REDEVELOPMENT Applicant/Owner: TAX MAP SECTION 129.681 BLOCK 1 I LOT 13 900 King Street owner,LLC. 900 KING STREET 200 Madison Avenue,26th Floor New York,NY10016 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK, NY (212)481-1122 Civil Engineering and Land Surveyor: --- -- — W70111&OV r _ 120 Bedford Road 4 V Armonk NY 10504 »� _ ti- r r r � ram-,-1 �- �,�„' ,�� i, r t r ����,_—� �� / (914)273-5225 - �,- �`� JMC Drawing List: S-1 COVER SHEET S-2 EXISTING CONDITIONS Attorney: S-3 SITE DEMOLITION PLAN S-5 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION VeneZlanO&ASSOCIateS S-4 SITE RESTORATION PLAN A 84 Business Park Drive,Suite 200 e�A �- Armonk,NY 10504 r r � PLAN NOTES AND DETAILS (914)273-1300 F r X ,. ,y� 2�/ r/f ilkr J' ��/� �•� O a Site Planner: AKRF,Inc. ?V! `7f�" r / C __ 34 South Broadway,Suite 401 -- -- / (/ �i / h White Plains,NY 10601 � - - �/7 _ �� / (914)922-2370 _- " / C > 'r X-. d AREA MAP SCALE:N.T.S. TABLE OF LAND USE SECTION 129.68,BLOCK 1,LOT 13 ZONE"P.U.D."-"PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT" PROPOSED USE:MIX OF AGE RESTRICTED RESIDENTIAL FIRE DISTRICT.PORTCHESTER WATER DISTRICT:UNITED WATER WESTCHESTER(SUEZ) SCHOOL DISTRICT:BLIND BROOK SEWER DISTRICT.BLIND BROOK DESCRIPTION REQUIRED EXISTING PROPOSED a LOT AREA (FEET/AC) 740,520f17.00 773,908/1 7.77 773,908/17.77 -51 TE LOT WDTH (FEET) — 1264 1264 ti --- LOT FRONTAGE (FEET) — 1306 1306 j — LOT DEPTH (FEET) — 886 886 $g "SITE - j BUILDING HEIGHT (FEET) 45 46.5 LEGEND '`! BUILDING COVERAGE (AC/PERCENT) — 2.19/12.3 — GROSS LA ND COVERAGE PERCENT 40.0 41.9 — s +� SITE PROPERTY LINE YARDS E - ZONING BOUNDARY c' �•` _ FRONT BUILDING SETBACK(ARBOR DRIVE)(FEET) 42 98 .• •• COUNTY/STATE BOUNDARY '<c _ _ �y�•� REAR BUILDING SETBACK (FEET) 30 130 SIDE BUILDING SETBACK (FEET) 90 234 lit Ye maw PARKING SUMMARY VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK DESIGNAIION KEY s s TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED (SPACES) 263 i . TOTAL SPACES PROVIDED (SPACES) - 595 _ VILLAGE OF RYE BFI r, P.U.D. LIGHT INDUSTRIAL �, •'..w) STANDARD SPACES (SPACES) 256 575 VICINITY MAP BUILDING DEPARTMENT -w SCALE:N.T.S. ONE—FAMILY RESIDENTIAL J / °� R-20 20,000 Sq.Ft.MINIMUM GF; �U HANDICAP SPACES (SPACES) 7 2D — SOURCE:GOGGLE/2017 ANY ALTERATION OF PLANS, ONE—FAMILY RESIDENTIAL R-15 j REPORTS BEARING THE SEAL 15,000 Sq.Ft.MINIMUM a` • SPECIFICATIONS PLATS AND OF A LICENSED PRO NGINEER OR IC NFSED LLANDL I�`�� rT. Y SURVEYOR IS A VIOLATrON OF SECTION 7209 OF THE NEW JI !'z SUBSURFACE UTILITY LOCATIONS ARE BASED ON ZONING MAP YORK STATE EDUCATION LAW, A COMPILATION OF FIELD EVIDENCE,AVAILABLE EXCEPT AS PROVIDED FOR BY RECORD PLANS ANDIOR UTILITY MARK OUTS. SCALE:N.T.S. SECTION 7209,SUBSECTION 2. THE LOCATION OR COMPLETENESS OF UNDERGROUND INFORMATION CANNOT BE SOURCE:OFFICIAL MAP AND ZONING 1 °pess oN� GUARANTEED.VERIFY THE ACTUAL LOCATION MAP VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK/1999 No. Revision Date JMC PI runing,Engineering,Landscape D`a"'"'_IX Apn,°veo JAR OF ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO EXCAVATIONArchit:ctureScale: AS SHOVM OR CONSTRUCTION. JMC Site Development Consultants,LLC Dale: 06/06/2019 Prolea`16222 John Meyer Consulting,Inc. Know what's below. - _ M-5 oEuoru-1 DLuo-CoVEala Call before you dig - --- --- - S-1 Precious Editions Obsolete 7� 29.ALL EXPOSED SLOPES AND GRADED/DISTURBED AREAS,THAT PALL NOT BE - - -- - _q/"L11500 FURTHER DISTURBED WITHIN 14 CALENDAR DAYS(7 DAYS FOR CONSTRUCTION SITES THAT EITHER DIRECTLY DISCHARGE TO ONE OF THE 303(d)SEGMENTS LISTED IN APPENDIX E OF THE GENERAL PERMIT OR ARE LOCATED WITHIN ONE � .--•--",. --� OF THE WA RSHEDS USTED IN X C OF THE GENERAL PERMIT), WITH THE NEW YO RK A STATE SEDIMENT DEPARTMENT CONTROL F GUIDELINES'ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION N E ERVAT 300 „® _ SHALL (NYS EC) ANSI EXISTING BUILDING LINE BE TEMPORARILY SEEDED WITHIN 24 HOURS OF DISTURBANCE,IN ACCORDANCE / EXISTING CONTOUR "BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES FOR TREE AND SHRUB PLANTING, TRANSPLANTING,MAINTENANCE AND CARE,"PREPARED BY THE INTERNATIONAL EXISTING INDEX CONTOUR SOCIETY OF ARBORICULTURE(ISA),LATEST EDITIONS,AS FOLLOWS: ',+. --- - >-"-- --------__.-- ---- _ R/V£R PAWAI 29.1.APPUCATION SHALL BE UNIFORM BY MECHANICAL OR HYDROSEED PROPOSED INLET PROTECTION J METHODS. _ TOP 27461 .' ---_�__ ,- /NV a PROPOSED LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE 28.2.MULCH ALL SEEDED AREAS WITH STRAW AT A RATE OF 2 TONS PER ACRE "I'�� �H--- -j 8 ��' -- ----- �--- .- _ �a�_ �� (90 POUNDS PER 1,000 SQUARE FEET)SUCH THAT THE MULCH FORMS A _i � _ ------ PROPOSED SILT FENCE CONTINUOUS BLANKET _ ---_-. " --_ --____. _..._. \8 y4 - 25¢ 29,3.SEED MIXTURE AND RATE OF APPLICATION: -_-- -%'o' _ -_._. --_ ,�-. _--.__ PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE _ - � - --__-_--_ ."__ /_._----__ -.__ -- WETLAND \2¢ 29.3.1. IN SPRING,SUMMER OR EARLY FALL,SEED THE AREA WTH RYEGRASS -. _- _- _--__-_ --e� _---___ -_ _ _- -__ - - ¢ (ANNUAL OR PERENNIAL)AT 30 POUNDS PER ACRES(APPROXIMATELY "- _-_-___. PROPOSED TEMPORARY GRADING / - "" ! /'� _-. , -- WETLAND 0.7 POUNDS/1000 SQUARE FEET OR USE 1 POUND/1000 SQUARE FEET). �: -- - " (- -^^--I PROPOSED STAGING AREA/EQUIPMENT 29.3.2. LATE FALL OR EARLY WINTER,SEED THE AREA WITH CERTIFIED ----_ ------ _ _- ,- PROPOSED ��( -__.- \/,/NV-26579 __ TAT III 'rid STORAGE AREA/MATERIALS PROCESSING _-_ / - _ "F� - yyy AREA 'AROO5100K'WINTER RYE(CEREAL RYE)AT 100 POUNDS PER ACRE j / _/ WETLAND BUFFER z( (2.5 POUNDS/1000 SQUARE FEET). -__-_ ---_- -___-_. --____ - ---_- .--_ TURB PROPOSED WETLAND BUFFER DISTURBANCE ��� --_"- DISTURB A AlE (t8,.000 S.F./t 118 AC)", EXISTING ASPHALT TO BE REMOVED PROPOSED STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION '"\ '/-'t l / `-�\ -- © - ---\ r P . ENTRANCE i 1 �� / � - = - �- --- --' - �� EXISTING FEATURE TO BE REMOVED --- - 5..�^-".--- ..-__._ - •```..... - -f "_ _ >�_,� - _ _."/ "�. - _ -"_ TOP 25662 / fQ PROPOSED INLET PROTECTION' - 7NV 25526 \ v� - sx s' '. �\ - (TYP.)(TO REMAIN UNTIL"'_. \ `" �f - `� --O/ 1.EXISTING CONDITIONS DEPICTED ON THIS PLAN HAVE BEEN TAKEN FROM �Anry - / - - _t \ 6 LL "TOPOGRAPHIC AND UTILITY MAP",PREPARED BY JMC,PLLC DATED "ate -� F y j PROPOSED-- BUILDING FOOTPRINT IS / / - 08/16/2017.THE PROPERTY LINE AND EASEMENTS ARE AS SHOWN ON A MAP -- // d / -- 1 __ __ F "� r �� /NV 25250(IV) ov �, \ TITLED"ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY,"PREPARED BY FIRST ORDER,LLC, /- / j�PHASE 1T�LIMIT"OF STABILIZED) ;' / \ -� l SZ Sf(SJ /s haF j >d U DATED 04/10/2017.EXISTING CONDITIONS HAVE BEEN SUPPLEMENTED BY A \ % f ,'' //DIS WRB -._._- --_-., N�;T l •Q�; r.� NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DRAWING DATED \ // ! _- ^ {`4 p oL �d O 09 OB 2076,ALONG WITH INFORMATION GATHERED BY JMC IN THE FIELD ON AN ,_. (±125rZOO S.F:�f•L. ACC.) ._ ---- 4 {y,.•�\ � J ` i // ARM ' i A LJi 2.IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE APPLICANT,OWNER,OR PERSON IN i l ' /// _ '� ' / `� /-E r" U�� / LJ..I I d All wDz co CHARGE TO NOTIFY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN 33 2p' / -' �' i ,' m .V '` ~:.Y.,,,... f r' I- i ADVANCE TO SCHEDULE ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS FOR SITE WORK.FOOTINGS, N/T IMIY % / xr Ar•.-/ - ' .o�f�i / I ^I I,-�.i� III �� - _.57,37 i i N O FOUNDATION,DRAINAGE,FRAMING,PLUMBING,ELECTRICAL,FIRE BLOCKING,FIRE iMlt6 ' �./I / rW AIJ / - ��,♦ _ /�L " ` ---... / SUPPRESSION,INSULATION,FINAL OR ANY OTTER REQUIRED INSPECTION.IT ,/( / �/ ..ram_ y_ / ',J". `.,• C y / ,_i-, -� \"., /Nv24s4f(N}....._ _ SHOULD BE NOTED THAT ELECTRICAL INSPECTIONS ARE PERFORMED BY THE TOP 25117 4 --T III �: 'l�� _. "- /NV 24551(N) _ :// W} VILLAGE'S THIRD PARTY ELECTRICAL INSPECTION AGENCY AND MUST BE = / _ " „fec'l , E'er;..,E lNVP4.46(NJ v f I'„-� --:,��,�� rNV 74J68(SEX '// Z / -.( ` -' TOP B ` /NV 246 33.'S/ 'n w SCHEDULED BY THE CLIENYS LICENSED ELECTRICIAN.ELECTRICAL CERTIFICATES, / j ,% Y/ / Y -"' �. (/ / -- --I- _�. '��� _E-. /NV 244.17(SW) ,�/ LL W- C/0 APPLICATION,ANY OUTSTANDING FEES AND THE FINAL SURVEY,IF �' / - NM/ >� i - i hVV 240 TJ(NEJ 7QP'24540F FkCCd�l '`��• _ 4344(NWJ REQUIRED,MUST BE SUBMITIEO TO THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO / \ xr An f .,---„ {� (J 0O SCHEDULING THE FINAL INSPECTION. ,J / Wanda% \ 1NV14088 SW.I_. ( _- / pW 12'NaPE-.. �_ _ �'' I _� I II-.... I =II I i _'-I I (n z>- 1'1 3.ALL SITE PROTECTION AND DUST CONTROL MEASURES MUST BE IN PLACE,ALL ;y-- .'I/- r " ' - -\NlNV 24162 /_._ -._ --1 - �i..'� --, //� ,� O GLASS MUST BE REMOVED FROM THE STRUCTURE BY NANO AND A SITE PROPOSEDLL � \� INSPECTION MUST BE PERFORMED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO >o /- ;q�g,,,, ,H„c L / WETLAND BUFFER C/ ' ,� \ -- -'' I',-- I,- _ =--I Z COMMENCING DEMamoN. �j". /' / N PROP�3ED STAGING n ,I - I Z Lr A,e \ DISTURBANCE oP25675 f ��_ 1 900 KING 57NFT Nv 25144 NEJ AREAAQUIPMENT / 1j --I=III o 4.HOURS FOR OPERATION OF CONSTRUCTION DEMOLTION EQUIPMENT ARE AS ",, � OwlIER,LLC, z /NV 254.E(WJ 3. '' {F: � - I_: 1.\\ Fouows: _ (t125,400 S.F. `\ _ O 7// ,/1 j NV 252. (r) 1 P STORAGE = f _ cal 4.1. WEEKDAYS:8:00 AM TO 6:00 PM OR DUSK,WHICHEVER IS EARLIER. / ! RSA„ -'- "F%'� f2.90 AC. /Nvz53.�(2f ,/ AREA/MATERIALS ) PROCESSING ARE 4.2. HATURDAYS:9:00 AM T9 4:00 PM. _, 4.3. OPERATION OF HOLIDAYS. CONTRACTOR EQUIPMENT NOT ALLOWED ON `R/ id"�I Ffl i I� 1 I-� SUNDAYS AND HOLIDAYS.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE SECTION d; �'" l / TEMPORARY O // // x \\ II I YY -Y 158-4 OF THE VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK CODE TO CONFIRM THESE ¢j l ; = l T''W Al C/ \" I�� HOLIDAYS. i GRADING SLOPES h'GO v_ TOP 244.04 /L ¢J/ ' / j / N hD'-ry // /{ � '.�„'0 1NV 236.a4(NE) 5.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES TO BE /, "F As' / - / WILL BE NO i\/ h O / // � /NV 73872(SWJ,„ �1 'II 11-� I-�� ,r A A/ �(` `\L! < OF AND EXISTING UTILITIES TO BE PROTECTED.IF ANY DISCREPANCIES ... 1ST1NG BUILDINyG/�7TTJO�y( / 7 GREATER THAN (V // \`� d"'^ TOP 244 3 _ "t 7/ "'.. 129 ARE FOUND,THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND /B LISHED B I.vyr y1 RJ�� _ �'5 0 ST RY l 11k' e// '4 Z(� 66, �OPy24564 ` y JMC,PLLC PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. t a \ /l // o y ��o„- INV24O22(N ` \ -// %/ \\ ACCORDANCE of cE /Loi c / ytLAr< 6.PRIOR TO THE START OF ANY DEMOUTION THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL '1e` --- l // 7NV2J89t(S \� NV 24042(SEX ", \I/L NECESSARY PERMITS Al APPROVALS FROM THE VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK PROPOSED SILT RKl ON F/RS LE L /l 1 � �rt I V239D6 NW `' 1NV 24443 SW /1/ �- ALL ALL OTHER AUTHORITIES HAVING JURISDICTION.CONTRACTOR SHALL PAY ;'� / FENCE(TYP.)(TO $246$ 111 / / w.wz uu I -� iROP00 TEMPORARY ALL OUTSTANDING FEES,CHARGES,AND DEPOSITS TO ACQUIRE SAID PERMITS `f RE EMEN aa.�s - NO DEMOLITION SHALL COMMENCE UNTIL A PERMIT HAS BEEN OBTAINED FROM �{j i/ / ' REMAIN UNTIL BUILDING // THE VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK. / xF s ♦ l "� "'6.°"."' -- -' `"Wi yr l DIVERSION SWA{E / i C FOOTPRINT IS ; �FA�4 / ar l / �� PROPOSED � - 7.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE THE DISCONNECTION OF ALL UTILITIES / /, / WITH THE UTILITY COMPANY HAVING JURISDICTION PRIOR TO THE START OF L /�' ;/ STABILIZED TOP 261,53 / / L r ) �W WETLAND BUFFER Cl �//a'01J / INV 254.4E 'r - DEMOLITION.CONFIRMATION OF DISCONNECTED UTILITIES SHALL BE FRONDED TO / / /� =- / / 6 v TOP 24522 - THE VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK BUILDING DEPARTMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH ,% --/ _ ;' ,' �� - _ /// I 14p f DISTURBANCE /NV 2J806(NE) THEIR REQUIREMENTS.LETTERS FROM THE APPROPRIATE UTILITIES STATING nzs.�F ;' _ / V23806(SWJ - THAT GAS AND ELECTRIC HAVE BEEN CUT OFF SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE ,I/ %/ /'/ =-� '--'" C/ O/ (t33,5O0 S.F./f0.77-AC.) - _ VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK. / A/ / ! 77P 2470 // T 246.9 `\ \ - d -' - TO 24461: /NV240.0(Nd) >`�� / �� e �' ?¢ ce B.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN,AND PROVIDE A COPY TO THE VILLAGE OF ,% / ; ' �/ 2373E - 1 : ar u✓V 240s1(sW) \ ✓ \\ RYE BROOK,A SEWER PLUG PERMIT INDICATING THAT A LICENSED PLUMBER .� / ♦ ""'s / rIJV 237 \ / - .1 zF�z 70P 6.99 / HAS PLUGGED ALL EXISTING SEWER LINES TO THE TO H BUILDING.F R CAS SHALL OBTAIN,AND PROVIDE A COPY TO THE VILLAGE OF RYE ♦, .,y V• AD TEMPORARY - BRROK,A WATER USE PERMIT INDICATING THAT A LICENSED PLUMBER HAS CUT ---/ -- Y H ;� 0✓' - J L AND SEALED ALL EXISTING WATER SERVICE TO THE EXISTING BUILDING. -.;aE W Asp / WIETFAND A SLP K 'A "" // / Lp/ /NV CNM / / � GRADING �' / /STING C`F 9.ANY UNSUITABLE MATERIAL FOUND ON DURING CONSTRUCTION SMALL BE ` /,:' 00•SANITARY SERVICE ♦i _"("- 3 J / T \ /-/ / --. \� \ �\ .\ \ r'f �- �._ ,r� ",LTG - BU(LD(NG DISPOSED OF OFF-SITE IN A MANNER APPROVED BY ALL AUTHORITIES HAVING L,+ r "'- JURISDICTION AND REPLACED WTH SUITABLE MATERIAL AS REQUIRED.ALL /// �\ 7� \' _ �rpj l aria . A �. (ALLACE HALL) ,I�,. a BE TERMINATED AT ' - 1T - / �\ / \ REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT OF UNSUITABLE MATERIAL SHALL HE COMPLETED -//.�A, " '� � V^ '�/H ♦ � --�� \-�y�/�) L /L l J� \ � � X,.'-,, 712.R- 5 P )� UNDER THE DIRECT SUPERVISION OF A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. MANHOLE'PER VILLAGE REQUIREMENTS ' 1 oceswIV F7 ff 10.ALL DEMOLITION AND/OR CONSTRUCTION WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY,INCLUDING L l / F•:N e.l / r/ t STREETS AND SIDEWALKS,SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH NYSOOT 0 f WATER SERVICE TO BE REGULATIONS. C ,..,,: / P � ,'/� ;'I -��� y �_C OMH /,,/ TLP 23261 p�� TERMINATED PER SUEZ o h 1 11.ALL CONSTRUCTION/DEMOLITION DEBRIS NOT PROPOSED TO BE RECYCLED � / ✓ � ,' ,/� /'.LL 70P 24360 /� //X � � s�/%" '�� l/JU 24689(SW) SHALL BE REMOVED AND LEGALLY DISPOSED OF OFF-SITE IN ACCORDANCE REQUIREMENTS _ - ,�,, ,, I �� ArzA h� �/�\ :/ L/// PROPOSED SILT/NV 23746(N/(/� L" �\\ -yr / WITH THE REGULATIONS OF ALL LOCAL,STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES . / / ,,. /T"�/ cr�a vrr -// FENCE TYP.-TO 1/JV 7368o(C9J HAWNG JURISDICTON. / COMMUNICATIONS SERVICE TO BE / 12,EXISTING CONCRETE MAY BE STORED ON SITE AND RECYCLED FOR USE AS / r / '/,"/ OAS SERVICE T 8E '.'.�M / \ I )I I I REMAIN UNTIL SITE IS � L� �V /���� a TERMINATED PER PROVIDERS TERMINAYONED \ COMPACTED FILL ALL MATERIAL TO BE USED AS FILL SHALL BE APPROVED BY ,,\ B B RE UI EMENTS ,.' / O/ �e<,r /,' -\\ \\\\-` STABILIZED) //,/<'/ ,/ A4,/ 12"RCP !THE PROJECT FILL ALL MATE ENGINEER. Ht -% ". .{ /� . RE EMEN s� TOP 2466J -z.:.,�� // '�'� wv23s.42 t / r o 13.PRIOR TO THE START OF SITE DEMOLITION,EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL °/NV 24110, .� _ t� WV 7398700 "µ ---_rw24000sw --\ ".�� ` // WETLAND'D' DEVICES SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WTH JMC DRAWINGS,AS �'aoeV '� ,4 SMN" fr / ! () J ' REQUIRED AND/OR DIRECTED BY THE VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK OR JMC,PLLC. ''.,/ TOP 25774 - --.1____ \ - SMN NV 24162(NW) , C/ \\\\ ` tt:;io -- TOP 249 _.. � d /NV 2365t(NEJ A _ ,- '- _-. cav TOP 244.0- \ 2¢¢ - - 14.EXISTING DRAINAGE PATTERNS ON SITE SHALL BE MAINTAINED TO THE MAXIMUM ` /NV 236.67(SWf� `-_ / 1 /NV z39.32 -- ( s v �, `" PROPOSED EXTENT PRACTICABLE. ✓ -_.....-.. -_ % `�^I.` -..\s ( OF �*''' /NV 239.23 SW ,ti / /)✓V 238752(NE o \ -- � /AN27875f \ / 2..LIMIT� A PHA$E' 15.ALL EXISTING UTILITY CASINGS WHICH ARE TO REMAIN SHALL BE REMOVED DISTURBANCE AND RESET TO THE NEW PROPOSED GRADES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE T "'- G -' /� TOP 239.06 / H' �� ./ Y// A �` I \ELECTRIC SERVICE TO DIRECTIONS OF THE OWNER'S FIELD REPRESENTATIVE.EXISTING CASINGS f - // \-- .e; T.,; r 'A A ® (t287,200 S.F.�t6.60 AC.) WHICH ARE DAMAGED OR UNFIT FOR INSTALLATION IN THE NEW CONSTRUCTION, 'Bf ` BE TERMINATED AT - Yi /____-- _ ______________T -JN S70(NJ� (}y"..�`( �� \� / 4 "PVC AS DETERMINED BY THE OWNERS FIELD REPRESENTATIVE,SHALL BE REPLACED. f e :y can _ !NV 2'-6(EJ �\ ./// ZTO A AP' f 129.66-1->4 MANHOLE PER CONED ••-� ------- `" , N „ Hex IO 1R_ <i; i / �, I 16.ALL EXISTING SIDEWALKS,CURBS,PAVEMENT,ETC.TO REMAIN,WHICH ARE ' ' X' ,� J - - T-----* -� �_+ 1 - 70P 23874 t\ h. X`<7 F. VILLAGE r R1,BROOK / DISTURBED OR DAMAGED DUE TO THE NEW CONSTRUCION,ARE TO BE L REQUIREMENTS _ T� " j "� /NV 23509 �" le //,'{� 1/� TEMRqKAR REPLACED WTH MATERIALS CONSISTENT WITH EXISTING CONDITIONS. ( _ __ /- --?'--.y _T _ - rv-__� '► I,.• H �� _E �E,_F i i �./ ��p p i - -v-- V+_W q P' AN ANTI r w 17.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL EXTERMINATE RODENTS AS REQUIRED BY THE P .�'� _�_,_ EtT-L- -gL� T ,y yw �yE ��E / WESTCHESTER COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND MENTAL HYGIENE.A \, / ,�.. E- -�- ,,._.- Vt;.mow_w I 'TERMINATED3.PER PROVIDER S_- ._._._.. • `,i / `��s. CMPe.` run' EVICE s�� LETTER FROM THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT CERTIFYING THAT A LICENSED \.,,/ ---- E_-, Fe-� F.-w= -.T ''' WiV EXTERMINATOR HAS TREATED THE EXITING BUILDING SHALL BE PROVIDED TO = -I- o= `..� --_ ._. --- - _- �0 L 3 - EXISANG ti r- THE VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK BUILDING DEPARTMENT. _/ �� - _�_- E_ __ --_- e _E- r __ �/rF ,� \ya B•L 5 ��' /^�' _F / E- _:i'z- ti v`= 18.PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF DEMOLITION,THE CONTRACTOR MUST PROVIDE "' eve _..- -- "' � E - -�-�'���� + �sS V.,r ....,W��V �\'^'� `4 ti'T, //� \OCS / - € -�� f 9 y s 24-HOUR NOTIFICATION TO THE VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK. E--'_ -{� E-W_�F�"�- { LE- � _ -- ,;i' c� �.-E-.E T� ;y o;� --- 15'RCP�.. // / TOP 239.14 „R_G ✓ ';6__v w-_w _. - _ �E _�� ,, \F '\� Oo i i \` j j, /NV 233 19(5) J ^�A / xr spa /NV 23J 04(N VI \\� 19.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE VERIFlCAION TO THE VILLAGE OF RYE �y_ - AR � - _i� $ y� - \F 'V`4 �G ice`. / '.s s BROOK THAT FIVE(5)DAYS'PRIOR NOTIFICATION WAS GIVEN TO ALL ADJOINING 59 xr s.., POSEDO STABILIZED \ F Nv23sa4 J aF�a\"_ J z E OWNERS AND THAT NOTIFICATION WAS GIVEN TO THE APPROPRIATE COMMUNITY \- (2X28; y e BOARD PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF DEMOLITION. x, 4 L--a - y k`% CONSTR CTiON ENTRANCE- \ Em c/ die w wvz.je �A Z w wo 22[[�V Y q`;E 20.PRIOR TO BEGINNING ANY CLEARING,GRUBBING,DEMOLITION OR EXCAVATION, - C- _ `• „,� \ ,�" --..._-- -- ; (1-REMAIN UNTIL-SITE IS 70P 239.02 ,P �,,,e�. " }": / �A ` // W O }C a ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE INSTALLED IN P _- - ! �- --- iINV"Z333B-(NW}..., C --_STABILIZED) ACCORDANCE WITH ALL THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS.EROSION AND „�// /�/ _ -- - - _----- /NV 73331(NEJ` .F j/� r�\N6,- ,,. \ __-- / Lb <2 SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE MAINTAINED UNTIL THE SITE IS -- ",�.;"--- - - <s STABILIZED.FINAL STABILIZATION OF LANDSCAPED AREAS SHALL BE IN -- - .5_--- -240.�� -. _ - -_-- - 24"RC '\_. `_ -.....- /Nv 22747 TR �,� -J Z EI o? ACCORDANCE WITH THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. -- -.75T OMH / 3 t PROPOSED INLET aP 2J832 \ 9.�! � ,1 T, ' 21.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSPECT AND MAINTAIN ON EROSION AND I.7O.6J-1-1 ��� i I � O Y L'- �=a /NV2'1.14(SWJ s SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES ON A DAILY BASIS.ALL COLLECTED SEDIMENT .-' _ , ',' - PROTECTION(TYP.) .' ,�� -- Fes` `/NV 23)04(SE) " WITHIN SEDIMENT BARRIERS SHALL BE REMOVED PERIODICALLY AS REQUIRED TO J/, , /- 1 NL GE OF RYF BROOK -_-_' i \`, `�\. '- - W O LLJ g a MAINTAIN THE FUNCTION OF THE SEDIMENT BARRIERS.ALL SEDIMENT ✓ 7..j y (TO REMAIN UNTIL Q y' 'J76� '1 /' Q �r m(,0 n a COLLECTED SHALL BE RESPREAD ON-SITE WITHIN STABILIZED AREAS AS '4464 .,+T�' /.r'L % L - \ V -t ,, \ - �.' Q _ DIRECTED BY THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE. / ..G/.. -L`:{' _ \V ti:�y//�/�/ z. 3854(EJ SITE IS SfiABILJZ '•r/, SI STABILIZED) \_ 22.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSPECT DOWNSTREAM CONDITIONS FOR EVIDENCE OF '3567(N) 3563(S) ; ; / i `� _ _/NV 22706(NWJ L o,e SEDIMENTATION ON A WEEKLY BASIS,AFTER EACH RAINSTORM,AND AS MAY ------ By INV 226.95 SE _ -. <' BE REQUIRED OR DIRECTED ALL APPLICABLE APPROVALS AND PERMITS.THE , r /' / ,. :'r '' -- `. - -"_- /NV 2293& CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY PROVIDE A WRITTEN REPORT ON FINDINGS OF 'i `�'-- �, I , `� -' -" �' -, YW' _= SEDIMENT IN DOWNSTREAM AREAS TO ALL AUTHORITIES HAVING JURISDICTION "- 'Ks __ ----yv725n Nw > y__ AND MAKE REPAIRS AS REQUIRED OR DIRECTED. � � 13069-1-7 7 --� Zlill 23.ADDITIONAL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE INSTALLED �� T' `, CNODL O/STRICT r�V \�; _ - E o BY THE CONTRACTOR AS REQUIRED/WARRANTED BY FIELD CONDITIONS AND AS H ` BLIND BOOK H/CN SCHOOL ;2, DIRECTED BY THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE,JMC,AND/OR ANY AUTHORITY `.\ &M/DOLE SCfTOOL -'; / - "---"-'- -- J w HAVIN6 JURISDICTION. H _. \ Tz \ - /NV 223 Bo SE \� 4 __ a.�� 4,/ - i m A SPECIFICATIONS NP nPs nNo R 24.STOCKPILING OF DON THIS L MATERIAL SHALL D PLACED ON SITE IN THE - „ AREA DESIGNATED ON THIS PLAN OR AS APPROVED BY THE OWNERS ./- i - (J ", GJp� \. E i D P REPRESENTATIVE.STOCKPILED EXCAVATED MATERIAL SHALL HAVE TWO ROWS "- �W"'/ ��T'.... W 1§TT /p'ti[37 I(,Y L) REPORTS BEARING THE SEAL OF SILT FENCE LOCATED AROUND ITS PERIMETER.ALL STOCKPILED MATERIAL " � i %� II! \ ' ---- ---- - ;7;---- - OF A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL � 7 SHAM BE MAINTAINED IN AN ORDERLY MANNER SO AS NOT TO IMPEDE ON - ��i r' '� \ - __ _ ENGINEER OR LICENSED LAND ��// *!/•. J e PEDESTRIAN Al VEHICULAR TRAFFIC CIRCULATION ROUTES. -- A } - - SURVEYOR IS A VIOLATION OF I§I _ 25.DUST SHALL BE CONTROLLED BY SPRINKLING OR OTHER APPROVED METHODS ', "- I ' ; ,' - - SECTION 72090E THE NEW _ � w r AS NECESSARY,OR AS DIRECTED BY THE OWNERS REPREHENTATIVE. _ \'� ..T 6/� YORK STATE EDUCATION LAW, ;.. ; �j `. - - ` -�.. .,�,� f// EXCEPT AS PROVIDED FOR B2. 26.ALL PROTECTED F MANAGEMENT PRACTICES SHALL REMAIN UNDISTURBED AND / ,-' TOP 69 - SECTION 7209,SUBSECTION 2. LJ BE PROTECTED FROM HEAVY MACHINERY TRAFFIC DURING CONSTRUCTION. �•. - "L �'� / \ `'�' V 217 V L%' �OFE SSLO HOWEVER DURING CONSTRUCTION OF THE PRACTICE THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ' \ 22072 V .� ', �f' 70P MINIMIZE AND AVOID HEAVY MACHINERY TRAFFIC TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT -" - ; i \ C/ 217.57(NWJ'; PRACTICABLE.THERE SHALL BE NO STORAGE OF MATERIALS WITHIN AREAS TO r --- --"' `.` TOP 220__ ,( 4, ,�. l orawn. EK Approved:jAR BE USED FOR STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PRACTICES.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL I '� . _ "7NV 216.54(SE) �R/ ti' INSTALL CONSTRUCTION FENCE AROUND THE PRACTICE TO DISCOURAGE VEHICLE ' �� -�� - % IH ! �'� ��� )•_�� N TRAFFIC. .. GY / o --__ _..TIP z20-37' t i; ❑H-. 06/06/2019 / x� 27.ALL SEEDED AREAS SHALL BE FERTILIZED,RESEEDED,AND MULCHED AS Pmjec I i F 1NV 216.27(NWJ �� // t N.1 ' NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN VIGOROUS,DENSE VEGETATIVE COVER. 1 'i// \ . �_�� -_ () / // 6222 ' L - ��_ r _\ / 16222 INS PLM_311E RWk 28.TEMPORARY SEED MIXTURES SHALL NOT BE PLACED ON AREAS WHERE FINAL ---- ' '�/ /�/� GRADE HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED AND TOPSOIL HAS BEEN PLACED UNLESS Drawing V. OTHERIWSE DIRECTED BY THE PROJECT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. ^-J 4,„^ J J 29.ALL EXPOSED SLOPES AND GRADED/DISTURBED AREAS,THAT WILL NOT BE --- >;,:-_.. - ---- -- ` >, FURTHER DISTURBED WITHIN 14 CALENDAR DAYS(7 DAYS FOR CONSTRUCTION -"-'-' dI/T rL/1/I LGVILTVD SITES THAT EITHER DIRECTLY DISCHARGE TO ONE OF THE 303(d)SEGMENTS LISTED IN APPENDIX E OF THE GENERAL PERMIT OR ARE LOCATED WITHIN ONE OF THE WATERSHEDS LISTED IN APPENDIX C OF THE GENERAL PERMIT),SHALL EXISTING BUILDING LINE BE W TEMPORARILY SEEDED WTHIN 24 HOURS OF DISTURBANCE,IN ACCORDANCE TH THE NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION (NYSDEC)"EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL GUIDEUNES"AND THE ANSI A300 ✓ O o EXISTING CONTOUR "BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES FOR TREE AND SHRUB PLANTING, TRANSPLANTING,MAINTENANCE AND CARE;PREPARED BY THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF ARBORICULTURE(ISA),LATEST EDITIONS,AS FOLLOWS: b E705TING INDEX CONTOUR 29.1,APPLICATION SHALL BE UNIFORM BY MECHANICAL OR HYDROEED EXISTING AREA TO BE TOPSOIL METHODS. -_-.-- -...- --_-- --- ____-._-_-.-_- __-_.� _-_--...__---__._- / TOP27467 AND SEEDED -__-. °---_- -__,v ._�..___ _ _- _ LI' /NV 2b6.5t(SEJ.�% a`\ J *., r/ 29.2.MULCH ALL SEEDED AREAS WTH STRAW AT A RATE OF 2 TONS PER ACRE >r'/-�� \/ J._.. m PROPOSED LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE (90 POUNDS PER 1,G00 SQUARE FEET)SUCH THAT THE MULCH FORMS A CONTINUOUS BLANKET. y ---- - - - - 29.3.SEED MIXTURE AND RATE OF APPLICATION: -.. __--__-- ------_..._--_ _ /•: �f -_ -- "J WETLAND'B' 29.3.1, IN SPRING,SUMMER OR EARLY FALL,SEED THE AREA WITH RYEGRASS _ _ _------ - --- ----- ----- _-_ _ ._ 1.EXISTING CONDITIONS DEPICTED-,THIS PLAN HAVE BEEN TAKEN FROM (ANNUAL OR PERENNIAL)AT 30 POUNDS PER ACRES(APPROXIMATELY // /-� - -_.__. - ;; _ - "TOPOGRAPHIC AND UTIUtt MAP",PREPARED BY JMC,PLLC DATED 0.7 POUNDS/1000 SQUARE FEET OR USE 1 POUND/1000 SQUARE "--- -" --700, \ TA RCP 08/i6/2017.THE PROPERTY LINE AND EASEMENTS ARE AS SHOWN ON A MAP FEET). ,-' ___ _._-__._-- ----'---- - ----_-._- ___. __---'" �- (�T ( � � \/NV 2b579 TITLED"ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY,"PREPARED BY FIRST ORDER,LUC, i' - - - __. a�r \'Lr-. ---- ___-- \ o DAZED 04/10/2017.EXISTING CONDITIONS HAVE BEEN SUPPLEMENTED BY A 29.3.2. IN LATE FALL OR EARLY WINTER,SEED THE AREA WITH CERTIFIED NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DRAWING DATED 'AR00STOOK'WINTER RYE(CEREAL RYE)AT 100 POUNDS PER ACRE 03/19/1986,ALONG WITH INFORMATION GATHERED BY JMC IN THE FIELD ON (2.5 POUNDS/1000 SQUARE FEET). 2.IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE APPLICANT,OWNER,OR PERSON IN CHARGE TO NOTIFY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT AT LEAST IT HOURS IN \_ar -- - t ADVANCE TO SCHEDULE ALL REQUIRED INSPECTIONS FOR SIZE WORK,FOOTINGS, _ _ _ q1/✓ T FOUNDATION,DRAINAGE,FRAMING,PLUMBING,ELECTRICAL,FIRE BLOCKING,FIRE -.�\ �_276 -- 1 _ _ - SUPPRESSION,INSULATION,FINAL OR ANY OTHER REQUIRED INSPECTION.IT \ ", _ -"-� `- -- -. �'^��' SHOULD BE NOTED THAT ELECTRICAL INSPECTIONS ARE PERFORMED BY THE _--- �� _-- ` �"'�� - --- - VILLAGES THIRD PARTY ELECTRICAL INSPECTION AGENCY AND MUST BE -.11--'\ 1; -,t. /-,s j''°t "..+- ! ) ---.-- - i / _ ,� - --_ DI 256.61 t SCHEDULED BY THE CLIENT'S LICENSED ELECTRICIAN.ELECTRICAL CERTIFICATES, --�."._ =/ -�� ._1'�- -�- _ --I - _ ,.% / "l)' ` -- 7SN- i \ -MY 25525 C/0 APPLICATION,ANY OUTSTANDING FEES AND THE FINAL SURVEY,IF \ / js "- _----- ____-- _-. - _ REQUIRED,MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO /x--� +`✓ _ __-- -_- _ F \ - -- » - SCHEDULING THE FINAL INSPECTION. ° - -- - - - j- 3.ALL SITE PROTECTION AND DUST CONTROL MEASURES MUST BE IN PLACE,ALL \ 'A- o PROPOSED"'- ��� / i I "--' GLASS MUST BE REMOVED FROM THE STRUCTURE BY HAND AND A SITE // / -PHASE 1 LIMIT-OF `� // r _ - F� "a�0 _ /NV 2525f(5) INSPECTION MUST BE PERFORMED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO � / �I COMMENCING DEMOUTION. DISTURBw,� pA\ F o Hpf P 1 J 4.HOURS FOR OPERATION OF CONSTRUCRON/DEMOL110N EQUIPMENT ARE A5 T \ �±125,2O0 S.F./f2. AG.) �-- ----, r, _ �'"�, d OQ- ! \ a HpPF U .✓/ �'/ O sfr{ a FOLLOWS: ARMIN 1 i / / �' r 4A. WEEKDAYS:8:00 AM TO 6:00 PM OR DUSK,WHICHEVER IS EARLIER. T3 -/ // \---�I/.r� �F_�_--,E W "` "�. 6'T4 �. - - Ems. Z D- 4.2. SATURDAYS:9:00 AM TO 4:00 PM. N 2�Yti/ xr n,e / �7 %•, / �! UO O 0 / i E_ CV_ 4.3. OPERATION OF CONSTRUCTION/DEMOUTION EQUIPMENT NOT ALLOWED ON tWt P. j /,' /' '/ -�A1J ' / t/'/ /, / 1 F_� All, 1/ i \.. ,,,, / } C/ ! _ '\, _ -_tNV 2455(N/ O SUNDAYS AND HOLIDAYS.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE SECTION i - > i, / /. - s -E TOP.25112 a �� lNV 245.5t(N) // O W} / �Z / 158-4 OF THE VILLAGE OF RYE BR001C CODE TO CONFIRM THEE -- %' V = xr nu'rj WASP - LLJ Z cmr - � l , fit.`..� / , _ GF C' r �_� /N4=74S R6 N IN 24368 HOIJDAYS. :=' % ) ,/ %.. \ / � / /, /�, / /__, � ��-_._-, �/ �' °/ `F�. /NV 244.17(sWJ ® \. -) , / OP 2as06 Nv2463t;(w 11 UP 24es1' ALL ASPHALT AND GRAVEL 43.44(NW) W w Y 5.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE LOCATION OF EXISTING UTUTIES TO BE / / \ ' 9VV 24079(NE) - l DEMOLISHED AND EXISTING UTILITIES TO BE PROTECTED.IF ANY DISCREPANCIES / iuoeeeo. L Wn,/ ' / ", /` ," /' /NV 24066(SWJ TOP 245,40- " ,_ _ - V(SE°%VENT FILLED)SUBBASE TO BE REMOVED.. � ///s �a�p ARE FOUND,THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND \r. "/ / o/NV 241 b2(12 HOPE) r ..q I G1YI '/ Z} JMC,PLLC PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. f ''l... -.. // ,/ DURING PHASE 2 AND TO BE /,! (n O - / / i / /♦:- �,' 4Eo Q� „ REPLACED WITH TOPSOIL AND. 6.PRIOR TO THE START OF ANY DEMOUTION THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL J2y,68-J-/,J WITH PERMITS AND/OR APPROVALS FROM THE VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK /-._faun:,.' j , ,E/ /'.' -�./.. /' E/ �F.' k,+ MULCHED&SEEDED WITH A LOW AND ALL OTHER AUTHORITIES HAVING JURISDICTION.CONTRACTOR SHALL PAY ,'// ,' / xrn,>L,'Narn,o N� /' 'AD'256..75 ' - f 11�L ALL OUTSTANDING FEES,CHARGES,AND DEPOSITS TO ACQUIRE SFJD PERMITS. = l/{/�Ij y' j �I!�Y-.900 K/TUG SIR�ET _ INV p,�'��1.44(NE)II3� Dn'N� LDFLOWER GRASS NO DEMOLITION SHALL COMMENCE UNTIL A PERMIT HAS BEEN OBTAINED FROM - ;�,/ / %' / O{H✓ER,LLC, /t INV'254,88(W) f s/ O THE VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK. ;' / / ;"// -.. - .: ._ MIX..(ERNST SEED.MIX !W s/ ✓ O / Wn,s ,ne () ERNMX-156) 7.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE THE DISCONNECTION OF ALL UTILITIES - , _: / ;` WTH THE UTILITY COMPANY HANNG JURISDICTION PRIOR TO THE START OFF _. / __-� ✓o I, ..- �1 n p , / ,((��:,,:",0 1.:- .... �E. '/ >F •,ti z DEMOLITION.CONFIRMATION OF DISCONNECTED UTILITIES SHALL BE PROVIDED TO > / �; As, - o / PORTION OF EXIS Z LNG,BUILDIND TO THE VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK BUILDING DEPARTMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH l j / f. /,' BE OWED DU RE RING PHASE 1 M THBR REQUIREMENTS.LETTERS FROM TIE APPROPRIATE UTIUTIES STATING / / i / ,// REGRADED AS N TOP 244.04 THAT GAS AND ELECTRIC HAVE BEEN CUT OFF SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE ,SIlVY11V "re VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK. /(1 ^� �. DRAWING S-1,TOPSOIL,MULCHED , INv29884(NE) 8.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN,AND PROVIDE A COPY TO THE VILLAGE OF ¢ / ;% -xrnzl -'J / /' / / ° o�a, /NV 23B 72 �,I cCC RYE BROOK,A SEWER PLUG PERMIT INDICATING THAT A LICENSED PLUMBER '/' -C7 / i ��'' / / 'I!- AC SEEDED WIT I A NO MOW SEE / a�N -,may L'/ -", \- '`, HAS PLUGGED ALL EXISTING EWER LINES TO THE EXISTING BUILDING.TI1E "/,' / / :' I�/ /,'/-/ //�'/ MIX' r, . /29 CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN,AND PROVIDE A COPY TO THE VILLAGE OF RYE W A>I/ l > ,- / /," ,/ // o aa.,�/NV 24752(NJ '� -- - TOP 245.84 b BRROK,A WATER USE PERMIT INDICATING THAT A LICENSED PLUMBER HAS CUT '( %Wn�� \ / '� ' /,' ,'TWO ST0R /� -"�, [Nv7388t NE "'�# {.>„'. /Nv24028 N - r NLLAG£ AND SEALED ALL EXISTING WATER SERVICE TO THE EXISTING BUILDING. / /' / . j/ ; OFf/CE BU/LO/7/G / / - /NV 238,91(S 1 p's� /NV 24042(SE) n i / - i U 9.ANY UNSUITABLE MATERIAL FOUND ON SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE ils \Wnffi yF Al ✓ / / PARK/NGON FIR,sT L l V'23906(NW) "a.,a /NV744-43(SWJ p;-" / ( CI SE> ASPHALT IN THE AREA UNDER THE _ DISPOSED OF OFF-SITE IN A MANNER APPROVED BY ALL AUTIIORIED.HANNG U "' SPA S 1, l FOOTPRINT OF THE FORMER BUILDING TO JURISDICTION AND REPLACED WTI SUITABLE MATERIAL AS REQUIRm.ALL �/J / .,�„ // /////// /, / FFE.246.87 / REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT OF UNSUITABLE MATERIAL SHALL BE QOMPLLTEO / A5 -%' //'' / / BE REMOVED DURING PHASE 2 AND UNDER THE DIRECT SUPERVISION OF A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. - Fo REPLACED WITH TOPSOIL AND MULCHED - 10.ALL DEMOIJTION AND/OR CONSTRUCTION WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY,INCLUDING F' / / i , 26,/ / / //,. r s3/ / ''l / I &SEEDED WITH A LOW GROWING > 'c/ ; STREETS AND SIDEWALKS,SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH NYSDOT ,t / ! / ,P './ iNV 44B / / //: TOP 24522 ,. REGULATIONS. l . I' 7 L l WILDFLOWER h GRASS MIX(ERNST SEED /Nv238o6(NE) 11.ALL CONSTRUCTION/DEMOUTION DEBRIS NOT PROPOSED TO BE RECYCLED /MF APS' / / / / / <- / / / / O/ r� ` l ; 7NV 738O6(SW) SHALL BE REMOVED AND LEGALLY DISPOSED OF OFF-SITE IN ACCORDANCE �- f yra+/ ' / / / - T f4s.9 MIX ERNMX-1rJ61 - - TOP 24.08 777"` WTH THE REGULATIONS OF ALL LOCAL,STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES / l V 2422/'(N)T y.='I TOP 74d.61; - WTHNG JURISDICTION. / /" % I ,"/// / // , ' , /N 240./'O(NEJ) \ )/ / / lNv1al..Pa(NE) Q- /NV 237E / / / /Nv24¢51(sw) l T l - 12.EXISTING CONCRETE MAY BE STORED ON SITE,AND RECYCLED FOR USE AS arnzc :' % PJ / / /Po '�'r'c�. ,-TOP 24699�' /'/ / l(/� _ 6 INN 2374(SWJ„ COMPACTED FILL.ALL MATERIAL TO BE USED AS FILL SHALL BE APPROVED BY =x' ;` / f` / / V':` \ l \ ' WnJ 9JY '�'// / �Jivv z41.o7(sw). Ao /c/ A --- TIE PROJECT GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. / -..� / P�0/, / / "cam ♦ /' ) /,GLp TOP 246.18�/ / / j��/ 'L // - rr WETLAND"A / lNv ON / : 1Nv 23744() __ -EXISANG 13.PRIOR TO THE START OF SITE DEMOLITION,EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL ---,.'- , ,F �'✓ ` /'` .f,� f lNV 23722.Sw DEVICES SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH JMC DRAWINGS,AS xr nss\ar nzs/, ./ / r , ,' �,- / /` / / / / \- / r/ / � >� -1 f �G} --- BUILDING REQUIRED AND/OR DIRECTED BY THE VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK OR JMC,PLLC. y / ',. L�. 4$ y"> \ - -- .. �l / ! / >`\ S' ' (VILLAGE HALL) `L t Ti 12"RCS 5 P J� 14.EXISTING DRAINAGE PATTERNS ON SITE SHALL BE MAINTAINED TO THE MAXIMUM ,- WA, EXTENT PRACTICABLE. i ' 7 i' \� 30"CUP a'. 15.ALL EXISTING UTILITY CASTINGS WHICH ARE TO REMAIN SHALL BE REMOVED Q� ;;' / / -- --- ��' _- � /' ' ,% '� "--- �/ / / /Oco /NV 2436 C' -. �, ,V// iNV 73603 AND RESET TO THE NEW PROPOSED GRADES IN ACCORDANCE WTH THE DIRECTIONS OF THE OWNER'S FIELD REPRESENTATIVE.EXISTING CASTINGS WHICH ARE DAMAGED OR UNFIT FOR INSTALLATION IN THE NEW CONSTRUCTION, FQJ/(/'[(/ / 7' /' ',''' ,-' /o +z- ,° / °l\� AS DETERMINED BY THE OWNER'S FIELD REPRESENTATIVE,SHALL BE REPLACED. y\Q/7 > / = r' - °MH // r� i YQP 25761 / -/ l 70P 24 ' /Ni�24s ss(swJ T' S0 , /Nv 23746 16.ALL EXISTING SIDEWALKS,CURBS,PAVEMENT,ETC.TO REMAIN,WHICH ARE , ,em ._. DISTURBED OR DAMAGED DUE TO THE NEW CONSTRUCTION,ARE TO BE % --/' / b '.ueic.vr� �, _,-, \`J..- - INV 236 BO(SEJ _, DIA REPLACED WTH MATERIALS CONSISTENT NTH EXISTING CONDITIONS. '/ f „/ W �/ l` 1 , 17.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL EXTERMINATE RODENTS AS REQUIRED BY THE / �� 4, s` i... WESTCHESTER COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND MENTAL HYGIENE.A -' - / _ - � / I..� 0/ �a7F '/ __ 24"CMP LETTER FROM THE HEALTH DEPARTMENT CERTIFYING THAT A LICENSED a 4^PVC �, � EXTERMINATOR HAS TREATED THE EXITING BUILDING SHALL BE PROVIDED TO /NV 24/10, i" r , t,'- ,! / �" .� Z/ /NV 739.87(NEJ /(�;/ THE VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK BUILDING DEPARTMENT. troO p \ / SMH j/ / �/i 00(sw) //� D D T n TOP 25771 / r,- _s i 5uW Nv 24v b2(Nw) - _t� 24'cMP 4 < �:�/ WETLAND >r 18.PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF DEMOLITION,THE CONTRACTOR MUST PROVIDE F.;to 24-HOUR NOTIFICATION TO THE VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK. / /NV 2365t(NE) / �__ II 1 /NV 239.3i(Nf - sau TOP 24407 r'.^ / '4 f� xr n,t i/, :PROPOSED/ /NV 236.62(SW)��' / t 19.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE VERIFICATION TO TI1E VILLAGE OF RYE _ ---- --�s/NV 73923(SW) , l ,�, d„ 4/ i5"RCP .�PHASE,,Z MIT OF rt ro"ss _ __ �' ' lNv 238.7y`f sw) T ,. / BROOK THAT FIVE(5)DAYS PRIORS GIVEN TON WAS GIVEN RI ___ TOP z4*s� '� DISTURBANCE OWNERS AND THAT NOTIFICATION WAS GIVEN TO THE APPROPRIATE COMMUNITY = _-- -�-- -_._..__--„ ' - ' � �`s �% � \r -� ,�/ - I � --� f % � BOARD PRIOR TO 7HE COMMENCEMENT OF DEMWTION. T0P 239.06 /" / , /N�2365115 ,�- t uv235/0(IV). /_; 7/ y ", (t287/�(�Q S.F. A4 I 20.PRIOR TO BEGINNING ANY CLEARING,GRUBBING.DEMOUTION OR EXCAVATION. ?81 d - c__-- -' ---L ----- I f J , ) Wa// ,� -e"pvc, B ` 129.6E�7-14 \\ \---- \ _/NV 23356(SEJ ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE INSTALLED IN .'" - '.. N `-, ._- aT / N ACCORDANCE NTH ALL TIE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS EROSION AND )( - t /�+s/r . =ZT- �T_-ieY /z,6.'�_ _C --3B,!740 L E 24"GM / i `-- TOP 23B.74 .� / SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE MAINTAINED UNTIL THE SITE IS j ( -�- _ - �, ��''\- ,%,` `,/NV 235.09 / ��\BROOK r STABILIZED.FINAL STABILIZATION OF LANDSCAPED AREAS SHALL BE IN _� 01�. - �Y ry ACCORDANCE NTH 7HE LANDSCAPE PLAN. ', �. � �' =�� �,,W ra �� -- - _._V,_._ TOP 2398,0 - xr ..--_ �- Nl-- - V;L '_ ---42 GF.... T,J r �./ TOP 239.7�+ /NK7J.167 �/j, 21.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSPECT AND MAINTAIN ON-SITE EROSION AND -' SEDIMEN CONTROL MEASURES ON A DAILY BASIS ALL COLLECTED SEDIMENT P E ..�_- Z boa T N �� / _- -L- ry WITHIN SEDIMENT BARRIERS SHALL BE REMOVED PERIODICALLY AS REQUIRED TO � ""` t o MAINTAIN THE FUNCTION OF THE SEDIMENT BARRIERS.ALL SEDIMENT ^�J, COLLECTED SHALL BE RESPREAD ON NTHIN STABILIZED AREAS AS �- `�h E E A DIRECTED BY THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE. / -. r _`.-�_- __--._ - ,.? -`�.. F- - {�E- 22.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSPECT DOWNSTREAM CONDITIONS FOR EVIDENCE OFF-= -Ws,o 739.14 e✓ - `p ,y Q )- s SEDIMENTATION ON A WEEKLY BASIS,AFTER EACH RAINSTORM,.AND AS MAY �,' 1NV 73J BE REQUIRED OR DIRECTED BY ALL APPLICABLE APPROVALS AND PERMITS.THE �3,,.-. ""'" -< /IRON" r_�'-� L�-� 7' - �f l`^ �T `" , /j /NV 23,304(NJ \ �E<`� .� j Z 3� CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY PROVIDE A WRITTEN REPORT ON FINDINGS OF - ,3. -___ES � " / \e > ((.Mr si /NV 23fi84_., Nf °.�5 SEDIMENT IN DOWNSTREAM AREAS TO ALL AUTHORITIES HAVING JURISDICTION `T '� �E_�L -K}'- /. "�, ="' - --- ---, `\ \ >o'-.� %/i; (2:Y2.8;N) T' --'O .-; gH AND MANE REPAIRS AS REQUIRED OR DIRECTED. .�' a--- - ! / <,.-�' / s / I- w ��-� �� (L cie „ Nv2.e d >' LLJ O - 23,ADDITIONAL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE INSTALLED E- - ��^ '- __- --- - /\\,, TOP 239,02 �, t F `s",Dq"� i at/s3 y,\..'< % \,4,/ Q W O U N _w c BY THE CONTRACTOR AS REQUIRED WARRANTED BY FIELD CONDITIONS AND AS o- - Li: _____________' JM1V 1333E Nw o / _� -_ ,i. ..-..sip / ---_- ----- � � INV23331(NE) 6r. �F '�' \Ns__-_ / r m .QS DIRECTED BY THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE,JMC,AND/OR ANY AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION. - �. �.\ b^ ITT \ � ` Q w N} s s 24G \ Nv22 J f;� \ \ w 0 24"Rc � �.. �r. > s g„ 24.STOCKPILING OF CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED ON-SITE IN THE 47/T�\ i_t O z ti F / s s E AREA DESIGNATED ON THIS PLAN OR AS APPROVED BY THE OWNERS ---'� - ,- _ :- - TOP 238.37 h yY�- \ y Ly -_ REPRESENTATIVE STOCKPILED EXCAVATED MATERIAL SHALL HAVE TWO ROWS -�� .-' .'- / -- /NV 23114(SW) O w- OF SILT FENCE LOCATED AROUND ITS PERIMETER.ALL STOCKPILED MATERIAL ' -- ,'�-., '/ -- >'N �� /NV 27264(SF) Xwa - s;= SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN AN ORDERLY MANNER SO AS NOT TO IMPEDE ON ,',, >/; - N GE OF RYF PROOK, ----„F.-- i -W `-�!/ `i/// - N O W �.o L%1 ..\ __ 3 CD POfEDESTRIAN AND/OR VEHICULAR TRAFFIC CIRCULATION ROUTES. 44.64 �� w C.O g s 25.DUST SHALL Y,CONTROLLED IRE BY SPRINKLING OR OTHER APPROVED METHODS '39 lop - - Ea„ 356J(NJ-_..., /i/i/',` ,06( AS NECESSARY,OR AS DIRECTED BY THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE. /, \ /NV 22706 NW ,,.' , J56i A) 26.ALL STORMWAIER MANAGEMENT PRACTICES SHALL REMAIN UNDISTURBED AND /'� /NV 22695(SEJ TOP 233.88 _ 'a Q4' CD BE PROTECTED FROM HEAVY MACHINERY TRAFFIC DURING CONSTRUCTION. t ' ', -' _. �`� -- /NV 2293&74bJ �� HOWEVER DURING CONSTRUCTION OF THE PRACTICE THE CONTRACTOR SHALL /. i t `. - �' _-----_/p1W22517(NW/,,�. o- "-_ -:� 7A\ = i % N /NV22sa7(se)' ry L7x -m...�.- T �� �_.� y r/\ / MINIMIZE AND AVOID HEAVY MACHINERY TRAFFIC TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT ra,� -� s� PRACTICABLE.THERE SHALL BE NO STORAGE OF MATERIALS WTIIN AREAS TO BE USED FOR STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PRACTICES.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ,QCHDOL DTS/RIGT,{3`» INSTALL CONSTRUCTION FENCE AROUND THE PRACTICE TO DISCOURAGE VEHICLE a; TRAFFIC. /, Itt `� BL/ND YZROOK H/CH SCHOOL !/ &AI/DDLE SCHOOL �> 27.ALL SEEDED AREAS SHALL BE FERTILIZED,RESEEDED,AND MULCHED ASU DENSE VEGETATIVE COVER �/z t /, ,- - /NV 224.00(NW) ANY ALTERATION OF PLANS,a o NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN VIGOROUS,D . - _ / ' - /NV 22J82(SEJ \a'.r �,r - E.��n < // TS AND SPECIFICATIONS PLA rvoo , - h 28.TEMPORARY SEED MIXTURES SHALL NOT BE PLACED ON AREAS WHERE FINAL `.�t'- __ k �� 1T j' e , ' �'� \ �� `. N 19 j f'� REPORTS SED PRO THE SEAL `UGN t Ir7 OTHERIM ES BEEN DIRECTED BY THE PROJEECTUSHED AND OPSOIL HAS BEEN LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. UNLESS _.I'/ t /,% - -. _ \ ', ":. _--�F�`'' �_ OFALICENSED PROFESSIONAL ;�>/P> ENGINEER OR LICENSED LAND 8 ' Ii \ �- r --� - _ �w SURVEYOR IS A VIOLATION OF w' i, i It. _ � lk - /, _-// SECTION 7209OF THE.NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION LAW, ... - - \ ,�. EXCEPT AS PROVIDED FOR BY - �(� � SECTION 7209,SUBSECTION 2 i OP 220.72 /N NW raven TOP 220. z/s s4(sEJ- 7(J. D EK APp,ved JAR �� �e. V 5 ''/> , , __ - , , •_ -YOP 220 J7, <� Date_ /NV 216,27(NW) '.9 Protect No:16222/2 /NV 215..11(SE) - \\ 1 0 9 , / 4 Drawtnq N. -- S 4 O _ o W 4 z U J� J O WO Z 2 LD (~O O ONO w} w Z Z LLJ w >Y �¢O NO} EF CD to 3 LLJ HOLES 1R1/2PRESSUE W A. ICQ Z Q Z TOP W EMBANKMENT TW(SEE NOTE 1) A 12 15 18 24 Y� WOVEN WE FENCE 48'LENGTH FENCE B 24 30 30 36 O (MIN.14 GAUGE,MAX 6' POSTS DRIVEN 16' C 36 4E 48 54 w Q O MESH SPACING) INTO THE—NO DUMP STRAP CYLINDER(SEE NOTE 2) � O Q CV MOUNTABLE BERM EXTEND PIPE TO 1'REBAR FOR BAG 50'MIN. sm cwxes ~ REMOVAL FROM INLET (OPTIONAL SEE NOTE�) - - PERMANENT OUTLET PIPE U 10'MAX.CENTER TO CENTER •, n.. DUMP STRAP xDox� BARREL Axn NEEDED 6'MIN. A .TRASH RACK A PRESSURE RELIEF a PRINCxAL S+ILLW i HOLES 1 1/2'DIAL a HEIgIT OF FILTER p II p -— CLOTH ABOVE O'TYP FILLER CLOTH � 24'MINIMUM,30'IYFlCAL DEPTH OF SILT SACK SHALL E%ISDNG I I A SILTSACN NOT EXTEND BELOW THE (SEE NOTE i5) PAVEMENL / Y Z -TI- IL-.�- TOP W PIPE EXISTING kz W 1 - L/, _ GROUND SECTION A-A ^$ _ PERFORATED SUPPORT O®�) - EXISTING 11�, q) STEELORR RISER [GRIUND (APPED IN MIRAH FILTER PLAN 1'DI A HOLES CLOTH,SEE DETAIL 5) IN RISER _ 50'MIN. SUPPORT BAR (SEE NOTE 5) PERSPECTIVE VIEW c A A NMP�Wr� BDDaM Nx ISOMETRIC (/5 REBAR) C - �:NaN BAR(SPACER _ - 1 _ 1 xlLnT�K{utamj - LMawglLxr BM(TYPICAL) 48'LENGTH FENCE POST EXPANSION RESTRAINT DRAIN INLET - Kp Wy�g m yuMY�q�) —— WELD _ NOWT SURE FENCE(MIN.14 GAUGE,MAX. SLOPE SLFERNESS SLOPE LENGTH/FFNCE LENGTH(FT.) (1/4'NYLON ROPE WTH IWARO ONE o WATERTIGHT 6'MESH SPAQNC)WTH FILTER CLOTH 2-tOS 5P.1101Q1 250„20Q1 2'FLAT WASHERS) Q PLA�1N �� auT WtW11Ix 0(a) IX1 OUTLET PIPE TO \\ - C.S.P. CONNECTION -(SIDE NOTE NOTE/D) - _ 'H+ 10=10.1 TO 5.1 150 ODD '-� 12 ERMA EINPIP TEMPORARY OR E UNDISTURBED 2T=_51 TO 11 �(75O O WN. CSP FLOW GROUND i 33-50[31 1D 21 1 70/350 CHAIN INLET � NOTES aT.v�ouF�� � \ U5X4n ANn s0P puNS CONDUIT -COMPACTED SOIL SqL A9iX >21 30/1]5 - - 1.STONE 9ff-USE 1'TO 4'STONE,OR RECLAIMED OR RECYCLED CONCRETE EQUIVALENT 13 \ j\l j.✓ *T:J,. �v • B EMBED FILTER CLOTH ALL SILT FAKES SMALL BE PLACID AS OLOSE TO TIRE INTO GROUND(6"MIN.) *DIM ED AREA AS POSSIBLE BUT AT LEAST 10 FEET - DUMP STRAPS , `\ `,. 2 LENGTH-AS REWIRED,BUT NOT LESS THAN 50 FEET \� \ \ • �' _ FROM THE TOE OF A SLOPE STEEPER THAN 3H.1V,TO \I 3.THICKNESS-NOT LESS THAN SIX(6)INCHES. m X-NS NOTES ALLOW FOR MAINTENANCE AND ROLL DOWN.THE AREA H BEYOND THIRID.E FENCE MUST BE UNDISTURBED OR DEPTH OF SMACK 4.WIDTH-12 FOOT MINIMUM.BUT NOT LESS THAN THE FULL WIDTH AT POINTS WHERE �� SA URA D ENG H La OP SHALL BE 12 GAGE CORRUGATED v STABI SHALL OR EXTEND INGRESS EGRESS OCCURS.24 FOOT MINIMUM IF SINGLE ENTRANCE TO SITE nxx LUWTIML qd STEEL OR 1/8'STEEL PLATE. BELOW TOP OF PIPE vrt y 5.FILTER CLOTH TG BE PLACED OVER THE ENTIRE WIDTH AND LENGTH GF AREA PRIOR TO PLACING OF 61DNE 2.CYJNOER SHALL BE 14 GAGE CORRUGATED (�(� BAG AnLmAnWH OAVN SECTION BAG DETAIL - 6.SURFACE WA -ALL SURFACE WATER ROWING OR DIVERTED TOWARD CONSTRICTION SECTION'A—A' N Md STEEL PIPE.FABRICATED FROM 1/8' ONCRE A ✓L. �*,.f�J(�//� FIRMLY PLATE DIE CYLINDER TO SHALL BE CONCRETE ENTRANCES STALL BE PIPED BENEATH THE ENTRANCE.IF PIPING IS IMPRACTICAL A FIRMLY FASTENED TO THE TOP OF DIE RISER. (4.000 P SI) � NO1FS: HI-FLOW SILT SACK A$MANUFACTURED BY -` ` MOUNTABLE BERM'WITH 5:1 SLOPES WIL BE PERMITTED. ACF ENVIRONMENTAL OR APPROVED EQUAL® INSTALLATION DETAIL 3.SUPPORT BARS SHALL BE WELDED TO THE 1.PlWOVEN'WIRE FENCE EEL.SHALLE BE FASTENED SECURELY TO FENCE POSITS WTH WIRE DES OR STAPLES. 7.MAINTENANCE F THE ENTRANCE SHALL T MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION WHICH CULL PREVENT TOP OF THE RISER W ATTACHED RI BY STRAPS PW1S SHALL BE STEEL EITHER T OR U TYPE W HAROWOW. (FOR AREAS W MODERATE TO HEAVY PREgPITADON AND RUN-OfT7 TRACKING W ROWNG W SEDIMENT INTO PUBLIC RIGHTS-W-WAY.THIS MAY REWIRE BOLTED TO THE 1DP W THE RISER. CONCRETE TO EXTEND SEC L ION A-A PFRIOOIC TOP DRESSING WTH AUG...STONE AS CONDITIONS DEMAND AND REPAIR TO LEVEL W PIPE 2.FILLER CLOTH SHALL BE FASTENED SECURELY TO WOVEN SURE FENCE WIN DES SPACED EVERY PRLTPERTES TEST METHOD UN15 4.TEMPORARY RISER PAID ANT-VORTEX DEVICE SHALL OUTLE 24'AT TOP AND MID SECTION.FENCE SHALL BE WOVEN WRE,6'MAXIMUM MESH OPENING. GRAB TENSILE STRENGTH AS1M D-g632 265 LBS pND/qT CIEANWT W ANY MEASURE USED i0 TRAP SEDIMENT.ALL SEDIMENT SFlL1ID, BE REMOVED UPON COMPLETION OF PAVEMENT AND GRAB TENSILE ELONGATION A,D-4632 20% DROPPED,WASHED OR TRACKED ONTO PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY MUST BE REMOVED ESTABUSHMENT OF SEEDED AREAS 3.WHEN TWn SECTIONS OF FILTER CLOTH ADJOIN EACH OTHER,THEY SHALL BE OVERLAPPED BY PUNCTURE A.D_MW 135 IDS IMMEDIATELY. 5.RISER TO BE PERFORATED WITH 1'HOLES SPACED SIX INCHES AND FOLDED.FILTER CLOTH SHALL BE EITHER FILTER X.MIRAH 1OO)L STAEILINKA MULLEN BURST I D-37W 420 PSI 8.WASHING-WHEELS SHALL BE CLEANED TO REMOVE SEDIMENT PRIOR TO ENTRANCE INTO TY HOLtIZ.AND VENT.AND LOCATED IN CONCAVE 7140N,ON APPROVED EQUAL MAPEZDID TEAR ASiM D-4533 45 LBS PUBUC RIGHTS-OF-WAY.WHEN WASHING IS REWIRED,IT SHALL BE DONE ON AN AREA PWDON OF CORRUGADWS.PERFORATIONS STALL UV RESISTANCE ASTM D-4355 90% STASH WIN STONE AND WHICH DRAINS INTO AN APPROVED SEDIMENT TRAPPING DEVICE. NOT EXTEND BELOW INVERT BEVADONS OF CUTLET 4.PREFABRICATED UNITS SHALL BE GEOFAB,ENVIROFENCE,OR APPROVED EQUAL APPARENT OPENING SIZE ASTM D-4751 20 US SIEVE PIPE.WRAP RISEN IN MIRTH FPRA FILTER FABRIC 5.MAINTENANCE SMALL BE PERFORMED AS NEEDED AND MAIFIQAL REMOVED AND REPLACED WHEN ROW RAZE ASTH D-091 200 GAL/MIN/SO FT 9.PERIWIG INSPECTION AND NEEDED MAINTENANCE SHALL BE PROVIDED AFTER EACH RAIN. OR APPROVED EQUAL AND SURROUND RISER 'BULGES'DEVELOP IN THE SILT PENCE. PERNIIDNTY ASTM D-4491 1.5 SEC-1 W1H 1 1/2'-2'SIZE CRUSHED STONE SILT FENCE SILT SACK STABILIZED TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN DETAIL TEMPORARY RISER & CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE ANTI-VORTEX DEVICE 0 = z zo LLJ¢ J" }' O z W go IIJ M O O m A Z H Q L LIL'J!n LLJ O OfZ M O HiY LL 0— O NOp w- O w sV Z L73Q Z Z J po Q Q Y > O AGE O rn ANY ALTERATION OF PLANS. _-- SPECIFICATIONS,PLATS AND i''pFyE Y REPORTS BEARING THE SEAL F OF A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL 41 ENGINEER OR LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR IS A VIOLATION OF f w SECTION 7209 OF THE NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION LAW, V z EXCEPT AS PROVIDED FOR BY F SECTION 7209,SUBSECTION 2 S'p 1oYAP 'SSA Devm'. EK Approved.JAR scale 1•=40' 06/36/2019 PlolacH No 1622.2 16771-SITE I DEMO PLAN-5 I --A Drawing No'. S-5