Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAbandoned Application Building Permit Check List&Zoning Analysis OB & C ONLY ��� Address: 10 j�� � Z v� SBL: l i1 l •Z1 — l Zone: Use: a- Const.Type: Other. Submittal Date S_ I Revisions Submittal Dates: t Ci l to 2 (o l AJf i Z� S Applicant: lam)t ti 1Z F_ Nature of Work: fiG A l_ �Fc� � •� ?��4--� P�...,..�nn1�..�� �2 �n.o-noses ►� '` I �✓��t,..►� �_rar`�, Ga+t�� C.gn.rt. C�,•aT�� � � ,- Reviews:ZBA: S E P l 2 70 g PB: BP: Other. NEED OK OK .y� FEES:Filing.T BP: C/O: Legalization: APP.: Date Stamped ✓ Properly Signed: SBL Verified: H.O.A.Approval- ( ) ( ) Scenic Roads: Steep Slopes: Wetlands: Storm Water Review: Street Opening. ( ) (Jf ENVIRO.:Long. Shore Fees: N/A: ( ) (� SITE PLAN:Topo: Si Protection S/W Mgmt: Tree Plan Other )_ (SURVEY:Dated 12 t Current ✓Archival Sealed Unacceptable ( (� PLANS:Date Stamped ✓ Sealed ✓ Copies: �- Electronic: Other (� ( ) License: Workers Comp: Liability Comp.Waiver. Other. Code 7S3#: Dated: N/A: HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRICAL:Plans: Permit: N/A Other. (••Y ( ) LOW-VOLTAGE ELECTRICAL:Plans: Permit: N/A: Other. (•� ( ) FIRE ALARM/SMOKE DETECTORS:Plans: Permit: H W.I.C.:_Battery:_Other. (•� ( ) PLUMBING:Plans: Permit: Nat.Gas: LP Gas: N/A/: Other. (� ( ) FIRE SUPPRESSION:Plans: Permit: N/A Other. (� ( ) H.V.A.C.: Plans: Permit: N/A Other. ( ) ( ) FUEL TANK Plans: Permit: FUEL TYPE: Other. ( ) ( ) 20I6 NY State ECCC: N/A: Other. (� ( ) Final Survey Final Topo: RA/PE Sign-off Letter. As-Built Plans: Other. (. (•� BP DENIAL LETTER: C/O DENIAL LETTER- Other. _ (- ( ) Other.- I--► G --c�SF� 442P___� l-I�T R) -_ U S Q_ al-r, ( )ARB mtg.date: approval: notes: (-�ZBA mtg.date: t "L approval• l notes: - (0 2�o ((PB mtg.date: approval• 315t l notes: REQUIRED EXISTING PROPOSED NOTES Area: Circle: Fie _ Front: Front: Sides: Rear. F.A.R.: en Space:T 3,Z to 14 S I 2 3 v An- Height: Stories: 1 3 N, i R,pv tTjfi /S GIj Wafv_ J9T_ SS 7-S-10-G- 3 P_ �L J wD �•F -I,!>' CLGSS lFtc.47to,� ll l c,-A L,k � BUILD,IA,/d/69-O. RTMCNT f EVII' M21 VILiJd�OF Rv "ig�� oK 938 Ict.c 'r) E'r R1,u;Bts �c�%,NY 10 PLAN (914)0 f 1-FAX(91f ;-39-5801 �AT� #tki4kktkkk4k#ktikk44t44i4k4k4kkti4t4kkkkkk44kk4i4ikki4kkki4#4tt4itk44t4k4tk4kktk4kt4k4kkkkktki4i4kk4tkkkki ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD CHECK LIST FOR APPLICANTS This form must be completed and signed by the applicant of record and a copy shall be submitted to the Building Department prior to attending the ARB meeting. Applicants failing to submit a copy of this check list will be removed from the ARB agenda. Job Address: 10 Rye Ridge Plum, Suite 26 Phone# (914) 273.5225 Parcel ID#: 141.27/ 1 / 11 Zone: Cl-P Date of Submission: 10/26/2018 Proposed Improvement(Describe in detail): Proposed chain link fence and gates and new shed for APPLICANT CHECK LIST: play area 'rhe following items must be submitted to the Building Department with the application-no exceptions. 1. (X)Completed Application 2. (X)Three(3)sets of sealed plans.(one full size(maximum Property Owner: Win Properties Inc. allov,able plan size-36"x 42"1 and two I I"xIT') Address: 10 Rye Ridge Plaza, Suite 200 3. (X)Three(3)copies of the property survey. 4. (X)Three(3)copies of the proposed site plan. Phone#(914) 734.3259 5. (X)One electronic/disc copy of the complete Applicant appearing before the Board: application materials. 6. (X)Filing Fee. Caryn O'Connor, Imagine Early Learning Center 7. (X)Any supporting documentation. Address: 250 Bedford Park Boulevard West, Bronx, NY 8. ( )HOA approval letter. (fapplicable) N/A (646) 734-3859 9. (X )Photographs. Phone# 10)( )Samples of finishes/color chart.(a sample board or Architect/Engineer: JMC PLLC model rngt'be presented lire night of rrreeling) , By signature below, the owner/applicant acknowledges that he/she has read the complete Building Permit Instructions&Procedures,and that their application is complete in all respects.The Board of Reviewreserves the right to refuse to hear any application not meeting the requirements contained herein. sr�� Sworn to before me this Sworn to before me this of day of 20� dayof 20 7- Sign'jUWe-*ro yowncr Signature ofA icant Jolts f >I Kall on, Caryn O'Connor Print Name ofProperty Owner Print Narne of Applicant Notary Pt Notary-Public Lisa P.Kolba NOTARY PUBLIC,State of New York '^! 'Ni c No.01 k04916831 " Yr—k Qualified in Westchester oupt Term Expires Dec.28, , � 6/1/I8 Frederick Taylor Associates 572 North Broadway Tel 914 289 0011 Architects, P.C. White Plains,New York 10603 Fax 914 289 0022 Taylor Associates Architects October 29, 2018 am Mr. Michael J. Izzo Building& Fire Inspector Village of Rye Brook, NY RE: 10 Rye Ridge Plaza Imagine Early Learning Centers-Suite 26 Rye Brook, NY Dear Mr. Izzo: This is to advise and confirm that the Rye Ridge Plaza building construction, as defined and described in Chapter 6, of the 2015 IBC/Building Code of New York State, has a Type IIB, Non-Combustible Construction Classification. The base building construction elements consist of steel columns, open web steel floor and roof joists with masonry infill exterior walls, metal flooring decking and poured concrete slabs, all considered to be "non-combustible" construction in compliance with Section 602.2 of the NYS Building Code. Note also that an approved automatic sprinkler system with a monitored fire alarm system is installed and maintained throughout this Shopping Center, providing additional required fire protection. Thank you for your time and attention to this project. If you have any questions or require any additional documentation, please don't hesitate to contact the undersigned. '(BRED ARC Sincerely, �G\��PEY T,q yti�> , Jeffrey Taylor,AIA CC: WIN Properties- David English 4+ �Xq� OF NO Mike Izzo From: Mike Izzo Sent: Friday, October 26, 2018 3:52 PM To: James A. Ryan, RLA Cc: 'Anthony Nester'; Donovan, Colleen R. Subject: 10 Rye Ridge Plaza, Imagine Early Learning Center Importance: High Jim, Village Code§250-6.H.(3)(e)restricts the number of children to a maximum of 15 unless the building is of fireproof or semi-fireproof construction as defined by local code.This is a hold-over from the old Town of Rye Building Code in effect when the shopping center was built. Unfortunately the NY State Code no longer uses this type of nomenclature to define construction classifications, so I must consult the old Town of Rye Building Code to determine how those definitions fit into the modern NY State construction classifications contained in the International Building Code(IBC). The applicant is proposing to place 55 children in this location.As such and in order to move the application forward, I must have an authoritative determination from JMC accurately identifying the construction classification of the subject Win Ridge building as defined in the IBC. Thank you. AWMell(T /zzo Building&Fire Inspector Village of Rye Brook,NY Phone—(914)939-0668 Fax—(914) 939-5801 mizzo@ryebrook.org 1 BUILDING DEPARTMENT VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK 938 KING STREET RYE BROOK,NY 10573 (914)939-0668 Phone (914)939-5801 Fax mizzoa,aebrook.org Memorandum To: Planning Board From: Michael J. Izzo, Building&Fire Inspector CC: Chris Bradbury, Village Administrator James Ryan, RLA, JMC Planning&Engineering Anthony Nester, P.E., JMC Planning&Engineering Date: October 29, 2018 Re: ZONING ANALYSIS - 10 Rye Ridge Plaza, Imagine Early Learning Center The following zoning analysis is for a proposed child day care center at the Win Ridge Shopping Center and is based on materials submitted by JMC on behalf of the applicants, Imagine Early Child Care,and the property owner, Win Ridge, LLC,and include; • Cover letter dated 8/30/18,prepared by JMC and signed by James Ryan, RLS. • Exterior Building Permit Application dated 10/26/18,signed by the applicant&property owner. • Application for Site Plan Approval dated 9/5/18, signed by the applicant&property owner. • Application for Special Permit dated,9/4/18,signed by the applicant&property owner. • ALTA/ACSM LAND TITLE SURVEY, WIN PROPERTIES, dated, 07/12/2013,pages ALTA-1 &ALTA-2,prepared by JMC.The survey is not sealed or signed. • PROPOSED IMAGINE EARLY LEARNING CENTER plan set dated, 08/30/18,and revised on 10/26/18,pages C-1, S-1,and S-2, prepared by JMC.The plans are not sealed or signed. 1. 4250-6.H.(3)(c); The lot for such use must contain at least 1,000 square feet of suitably fenced rear or side yard play area for each five children or part thereof,and each such play area shall be located not less than 30 feet from any lot line except where the rear or side yard lot line abuts a public park or parkway property and not less than 50 feet from any residential structure on any adjoining lot. Such play area shall be suitably screened with planting or other means to avoid a noise nuisance to adjoining properties. The applicant's proposal calls for a total of 55 children,which requires a minimum of 11,000 square feet of approved play area.The applicant is proposing to provide a total of 3,264 square feet of code compliant play area. -1- 2. 4250-6.H.(3)(e); The center shall not have more than 15 children in any case,except if the building is of fireproof or semi-fireproof construction as defined by the Building Code of the Village of Rye Brook. The existing shopping center buildings are not of fireproof or semi-fireproof construction. The standard for fireproof or semi-fireproof construction set by this section of code is a hold-over from the old Town of Rye (ToR)Building Code adopted on 1215150, and in place when the shopping center was constructed. The terms, "fireproof'and "semi- fireproof'are antiquated and not consistent with construction type classifications contained in the current NYSUFP&BC. Therefore a comparison was made between the definitions of`fireproof'and "semi-fireproof'as contained in the ToR code, and the actual construction type classification of the existing shopping center buildings as defined by the 2015 International Building Code (IBC). It has been determined that the existing shopping center building construction as defined by the IBC is Type H B, which is defined in Table 601 of the IBC as having no fire resistance rating on any structural members. This falls short of the requirements for fire resistance rated structural members set by the ToR Code for fireproof and for semi fireproof construction. It should be noted that the existing shopping center buildings are fully protected with a code compliant fire suppression sprinkler system, the existence of which was not contemplated by the ToR Code. 3. 4250-6.H.(3)(fl;The center shall have an off-street drop-off/pickup area capable of storing the maximum number of vehicles simultaneously delivering and/or collecting children from the facility. The proposed location for the center is the Rye Ridge Plaza Building,which fronts on and is supported by the western-most parking lot located adjacent to the passive park. This is a shared lot and not exclusive to any single tenant. The applicant has not provided the information needed to determine if the existing Win Ridge shared parking lot at this location can support this requirement. -2- On a motion made by Trustee Rednick and seconded by Trustee Heiser,the following resolution was adopted. RESOLUTION CONSIDERING AN APPLICATION FOR A SITE PLAN AMENDMENT FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 100-150 SOUTH RIDGE STREET, 1-34 RYE RIDGE PLAZA&158-204 SOUTH RIDGE STREET FOR THE RYE RIDGE SHOPPING CENTER VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK BOARD OF TRUSTEES WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees is in receipt of an application by property owner Win Ridge Realty, LLC as Agent for Win Ridge Shopping Centcr-DE LLC, Win Plaza-DE LLC, and Win Ridge Shopping Center South-DC LLC for approval of an amended site plan to convert an additional 13,950 square feet of the Rye Ridge Shopping Center to a restaurant use or other equivalent use,beyond that currently existing,on property located at 100-150 South Ridge Street, 1- 34 Rye Ridge Plaza, 158-204 South Ridge Street, at the intersection of South Ridge Street and Bowman Avenue,designated as Parcel ID 141.27-1-7, 141.27-1-6 and 141.35-2-36 on the Town of Rye Tax Map and located in the Cl-P Zoning District;and WHEREAS,the Board of Trustees is the Approval Authority for the application;and WHEREAS, the Village Board of Trustees has received and reviewed the information submitted by the Applicant in connection with the application,as follows: 1. Site Plan Application 2. Site Plan Submittal Review Check List 3. Short Environmental Assessment Form 4. Letter to the Mayor and Board of Trustees from John Meyer Consulting,P.C., Armonk,N.Y.,dated September 16,2014 5. Letter to the Mayor and Board of Trustees from John Meyer Consulting,P.C., Armonk,N.Y.,dated April 8,2014 6. Letter to the Chairman and the Planning Board from John Meyer Consulting,P.C., Armonk,N.Y.,dated June 10,2014 7. Letter to the Chairman and the Planning Board from John Meyer Consulting,P.C., Armonk,N.Y.,dated May 29,2014 8. Letter to the Chairman and the Planning Board from John Meyer Consulting,P.C., Armonk,N.Y.,dated April 29,2014 9. Additional traffic,parking and pedestrian information and analysis dated 1%lay 29,2014, prepared by John Meyer Consulting,P.C.,Armonk,N.Y. 10."Traffic and Parking Study,Rye Ridge Shopping Center,"dated April 8,2014,prepared by John Meyer Consulting,P.C.,Armonk,N.Y. 11."Site Plan,Sheet S-1,"dated 04/08/2014,prepared by John Meyer Consulting,P.C., Armonk,N.Y. 12."Additional Parking Sign Plan,Sheet AP-1,"dated 08/01/2014,revised 08/27/2014, prepared by John Meyer Consulting,P.C.,Armonk,N.Y. 13."Employee Parking Plan,Sheet EP-1,"dated 08/27/2014,revised 09/04/2014, prepared by John Meyer Consulting,P.C.,Armonk,N.Y. WHEREAS,on April 22,2014 the Board of Trustees,pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) and after review of the Short Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) prepared by the Applicant, determined the proposed action to be an Unlisted Action pursuant to SEQRA;and WHEREAS,on April 22,2014 the Board of Trustees referred the application to the Village of Rye Brook Planning Board for Report and Recommendation and the Planning Board issued its Report and Recommendation on August 14,2014;and WHEREAS, on September 9, 2014 the subject application was referred to the Town/Village of Harrison and the Port Chester Rye Union Free School District;and WHEREAS, on September 23, 2014 the Board of Trustees opened a public hearing on the subject application, at which time all persons interested were given an opportunity to speak on behalf of or in opposition to said application and the public hearing was closed on September 23rd; and WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees reviewed the Report and Recommendations of the Village Planning Board,and comments the Village Planning Consultant and Village Staff;and WHEREAS,the Board of Trustees is familiar with the site and all aspects of the project. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Trustees hereby determines that the Project will not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts based upon the information stated in the EAF and supplemental information and hereby adopts the annexed Negative Declaration. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Board of Trustees hereby finds that the applicant may utilize the joint use of parking spaces pursuant to Village Code §250-6(G)(1)(c)(21) because the capacity of parking spaces available at the Rye Ridge Shopping Center will accommodate the proposed use given the peak hours of the proposed use as compared to the peak hours of the overall shopping center,subject to the conditions set forth herein. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the subject application to amend an approved Site Plan to convert an additional 13,950 square feet of the Rye Ridge Shopping Center to a restaurant use or other equivalent use,beyond that currently existing,as shown on the plans referenced herein, at property located at 100-150 South Ridge Street, 1-34 Rye Ridge Plaza and 158-204 South Ridge Street,is hereby approved on the following conditions: 1. "Other equivalent use" as referenced above shall mean any permitted use that requires an equal or less number of parking spaces as compared to a restaurant use of the same gross floor area,pursuant to Section 250-6.G of the Village of Rye Brook Code and any later amended version thereof. 2.The Applicant shall direct tenants of the Shopping Center to park in the employee parking areas shown on the Employee Parking Plan (EP-1), prepared by John Meyer Consulting, dated August 27, 2014, last revised September 4, 2014, which employee parking areas generally represent outlying parking areas not typically used by patrons of the shopping center. The Applicant shall implement a policy consistent with this condition. 3. The Applicant shall implement the Additional Parking Sign Plan, prepared by John Meyer Consulting, dated August 1, 2014, last revised August 27, 2014, to direct and encourage patrons to utilize areas of additional parking within the Shopping Center not otherwise utilized on a regular basis. However, the Additional Parking Sign Plan shall be revised to incorporate additional"C"signs at the following locations: a. the southwest corner of the central parking area where a right hand turn allows entrance into the southern-most parking area;and b. At the right hand turn at the rear of the south retail building of the main shopping center area that allows entrance into the parking area associated with Rye Ridge Shopping Center South. 4. Conversion of up to an additional 13,950 square feet of the Shopping Center's existing gross floor area, beyond that currently existing, to restaurant or other equivalent use shall not by itself be the basis to require additional site plan review, except to the extent site plan review is otherwise required in connection with the review of a special permit application, but shall require the issuance of a building permit and compliance with all other applicable State, County and Village laws, rules and regulations pertaining to such use. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that no permits shall be issued until the Applicant has paid to the Village all applicable fees and professional review fees incurred in connection with review of this Application. TRUSTEE EPSTEIN AYE TRUSTEE REISER AYE TRUSTEE KLEIN AYE TRUSTEE REDNICK AYE MAYOR ROSENBERG AYE State of New York County of Westchester ss: Village of Rye Brook I hereby certify that this is the Resolution adopted by the Board of Trustees of the Village of Rye Brook which was duly passed by said Board on September 23,2014. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the Seal of the Village of Rye Brook,this 2nd day of October,2014. CA lla a Clerk BUILDING bRTMENT D �-� J V VILLA E OF RYE,BROOK 938 KING SET RYE BROOK,NY 10573 JUN 2 9 2018 (914)9:4�6 $ (914)939-5801 www:ry�ook.ore. VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK BUILDING DEPARTMENT INTERIOR BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: \ppro%al Date: I'crtnll Application Fee:$ \ppro\al Signature: Permit Fees:$ I)isappro\ed: Other: ►«*«*,t*,►*,tr.*,r****,r**,+****,r********,r,r.,t,r«*,►**,►******,r,►,►*,t*,r,r,r,r,r�*�*****�***�*+�*�**r****�**�*r.a*,r*****�***�* Application dated: �/�9�� 8 is hereby made to the Building Inspector of the Village of Rye Brook,NY,for the issuance of a Permit for the interior alteration of an existing building,or for a change in use,as per detailed statement described below. 1. Job Address: 20 RyF RIDGE P442A 0 9YE 06-0k/ "JV SBL: 14 Zone: 2. Proposed Improvement.(Describe in detail): PROPOSED DAYCAAC- Tb 1W4t 06 /w7E00R A67EIQ47I09,S To E)(051'YAJ-4 SPACC 7HESE /4LIERA 170JS iAIUADE hlEKI Part-t4AI7 UARJA14 PARTIr1005 1 D60RS, RAIISHC:r, L164TIN47 AND PLUMB/nJE; 3. Does the proposed improvement involve a Home-Occupation as per§250-38 of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook? No: >< Yes: If yes,indicate: TIER 1: TIER II: TIER III: 4. Will the proposed project require the installation of a new,or an extension/modification to an existing automatic fire suppression system(Fire Sprinl.lcr. :\\tit.S ,tcm. I M-_I)I)Sxstem. I%pc I I load.etc...):No: Yes: A please submit u ,,puratc \utomatic Fire Suppression S)stcnl Permit application h 2 sets ofdetailed engineered plans) 5. Occupancy;(I fam.,2 fam.,comm.,etc...)Prior to Construction: 6 t-41.4 After Construction: 601-4 M 6. N.Y State Construction Classification: N.Y.State Use Classification: 7. Property Owner: WAN RJD�r E 12EAGI-7 , I-L(;. Address: 2,q F-46 P066 eLA2A t ME QX W4,14y Phone# 9/1/- 416S- 7.3 22- Cell# y V-YX -2-431 email: Q&,k(L.ISM@ W IA PROP,40AI 8. Applicant: 04v/O F.. §L/,5 k tL Address:'Zq RYE 91ft6 P442A, RyE 80M-, Phone# 9/ - 68-13 22 Cell# 1723-y0d-2T31 email: DFNq USNe i/yWP to, Cary-t 9. Architect/Engineer: Address: 2-35 MAMAR.bF.?FGICiAW& V K M05,01 Phone# 514-A28 -2291 Cell# email: 10. General Contractor: Address: Phone# Cell# email: 11. Estimated cost of construction $ I S6 t W)• 00 \t i 1 I: 1 he cwmaled cost,hall include all latxwr.matei ial.scalr oldmg.li\cd cgwPnu•m PruiCi',iunal tic:_and material and labor t%hich inaN be donator grali,i 12. Job Timetable:Start: Finish: -1- 6/1/18 This application must be properly completed in its entirety and must include the notarized signature(s) of the legal owner(s) of the subject property, and the applicant of record in the spaces provided. Any application not properly completed in its entirety and/or not properly signed shall be deemed null and void and will be returned to the applicant. Please note that application fees are non-refundable. STATE OF NEW YOR ,COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER ) as: IA_b �Y , being duly sworn,deposes and states that he/she is the applicant above named, (print name of individual signing as the applicant) and further states that (s)he is the legal owner of the property to which this application pertains, or that (s)he is the for the legal owner and is duly authorized to make and file this application. (indicate architecUcontractor,agent,attorney,etc.) That all statements contained herein are true to the best of his/her knowledge and belief, and that any work performed,or use conducted at the above captioned property will be in conformance with the details as set forth and contained in this application and in any accompanying approved plans and specifications,as well as in accordance with the New York State Uniform Fire Prevention & Building Code,the Code of the Village of Rye Brook and all other applicable laws,ordinances and regulations, By signing this application,the property owner further declares that he/she has inspected the subject property,and that to the best of his/her knowledge there are no roof drains,sump pumps or other prohibited stormwater or groundwater connections or sources of infiltration into the sanitary sewer system on or from the subject property. Sworn to before me this o q_O _ Sworn to before me this 2q4,-A, day , 20 day of '-:5U V\X 20 13' Sign, e of Pr ert. ner aSignatu of A licant USct- Prim Name of Property Owner Print Print Name of Applicant Nota Public Notaryvubjc KELLY SANDLER Notary Public, State of New York KE►LY SANDLER No. 01SA6003882 Notary Public, State of New York Qualified in Westchester County No, 01SX6003882 Commission Expires March 9, 20'22, Qualified in Westchester County Commission Expires March 9, 20�22 -2- 6/1/18 BUIL ��f R MENT VIE OF R OK 938 KING ET RVE BR ,NY105REVISH (914)9 39-580 PLAN OCT 2 6 2018 ` e DATE FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: Approval Date: Permit# Application# Approval Signature:_ ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD: Disapproved: ; Date: BOT Approval Date: Case# Chairman: PB Approval Date: Case# Secretary: ZBA Approval Date: Z S 1 Case# I l — dPZ 6P Other: Application Fee: Permit Fees: EXTERIOR BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION Application dated: 10/26/2018 is hereby made to the Building Inspector of the Village of Rye Brook,NY,for the issuance of a Permit for the construction of buildings,structures,additions,alterations or for a change in use,as per detailed statement described below. 1. 1obAddress: 10 Rye Ridge Plaza,Suite 26, Rye Brook, NY 2. Parcel lD#: 141.2 7.17 Zone: (I-P 3. Proposed Improvement(Describe in detail): Replace existing chain link fence with new chain link fence and gates_, reseed area, clear and grub vines and add new landscaping for outdoor play area. 4. Property Owner: Win Plaza, LLC Address: 10 Rye Ridge Plaza,Suite 200, Rye Brook, NY Phone# (914) 468-7322 Cell# e-mail denglish@winprop.com List All Other Properties Owned in Rye Brook: N/A Applicant: Caroyn O'Connor, Imagine Learning Center Address: 250 Bedford Park Blvd.West, Bronx, NY 10468 Phone# (646) 734.3859 Cell# e-mail caryn@imagineelc.com Architect: Busing Associates Address: 235 Mamaroneck Ave,White Plains, NY 10601 Phone# (914) 428-2291 Cell# e-mail Engineer: JMC, PLLC Address: 120 Bedford Road,Armonk, NY 10504 Phone#(914) 273-5225 Cell# e-mail Imunz@imcplic.com General Contractor: TBD Address: Phone# Cell# e-mail (t) 6/1/18 5. Occupancy;(1-Fam.,2-Fam.,Commercial.,etc...)Pre-construction: Commercial Post-construction: Commercial 6. Area of lot: Square feet: 143,748 s.f. Acres: 3.34 acres 7. Dimensions from proposed building or structure to lot lines: front yard: N/A rear yard: N/A right side yard: N/A left side yard: N/A other: N/A "Re-Occupancy of an existing space in Rye Ridge Plaza 8. If building is located on a corner lot,which street does it front on: N/A 9. Area of proposed building in square feet: Basement: N/A 1st fl: N/A 2nd ft: N/A 3'fl: - 10. Total Square Footage of the proposed new construction: N/A 11. For additions,total square footage added:Basement: N/A 11 fl: 2"d fl: 3'fl: 12. Total Square Footage of the proposed renovation to the existing structure: 4,464 s.f. 13. N.Y.State Construction Classification: N N.Y.State Use Classification: N 14. Number of stories: N/A Overall Height: N/A Median Height: N/A 15. Basement to be full,or partial: N/A finished or unfinished: N/A 16. What material is the exterior finish: Existing Brick Facade 17. Roof style;peaked,hip,mansard,shed,etc: N/A Roofing material: N/A 18. What system of heating: N/A 19. If private sewage disposal is necessary,approval by the Westchester County Health Department must be submitted with this application. N/A 20. Will the proposed project require the installation of a new,or an extension/modification to an existing automatic fire suppression system?(Fire Sprinkler,ANSL System,FM-200 System,Type I Hood,etc...) Yes: No: X (rf yes,applicant must submit a separate Automatic Fire Suppression System Permit application&2 sets of detailed engineered plans) 21. Will the proposed project disturb 400 sq.ft.or more of land,or create 400 sq.ft.or more of impervious coverage requiring a Stormwater Management Control Permit as per§217 of Village Code? Yes: No: X Area: 80 s.f. 22. Will the proposed project require a Site Plan Review by the Village Planning Board as per§209 of Village Code? Yes: X No: ("rfyes,applicant must submit a Site Plan Application,&provide detailed drawings) 23. Will the proposed project require a Steep Slopes Permit as per§213 of Village Code Yes: No:_X (iif yes,you must submit a Site Plan Application,&provide a detailed topographical survey) 24. Is the lot located within 100 ft.of a Wetland as per§245 of Village Code? Yes: No: X (iif yes,the area of wetland and the wetland buffer zone must be properly depicted on the survey&site plan) 25. Is the lot or any portion thereof located in a Flood Plane as per the FIRM Map dated 9/28/07? Yes: No: X (rf yes,the area and elevations of thefloodplane must be properly depicted on the survey&site plan) 26. Will the proposed project require a Tree Removal Permit as per§235 of Village Code? Yes: No: X (rfyes,applicant must submit a Tree Removal Permit Application) 27. Does the proposed project involve a Home-Occupation as per§250-38 of Village Code? Yes: No: X Indicate: TIER I: TIER II: TIER III: (rfyes,a Home Occupation Permit Application is required) 28. List all zoning variances granted or denied for the subject property: 29. What is the total estimated cost of construction: $ 15,000 Note:The estimated cost shall include all site improvements,labor,material,scaffolding,fixed equipment,professional fees,including any material and labor which may be donated gratis.If the final cost exceeds the estimated cost,an addition/fee will be requiredprior to issuance of the CIO. 30. Estimated date of completion: December 15, 2018 (2) 6/1/18 This application must be properly completed in its entirety by a N.Y. State Registered Architect or N.Y. State Licensed Professional Engineer& signed by those professionals where indicated. It must also include the notarized signature(s) of the legal owner(s) of the subject property, and the applicant of record in the spaces provided. Any application not properly completed in its entirety and/or not properly signed shall be deemed null and void, and will be returned to the applicant. Please note that application fees are non-refundable. STATE OF NEW YORK,COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER ) as: (70✓(d n O ' t'"'On h Off ,being duly sworn,deposes and states that lie/she is the applicant above named, (print name o individual signing as the applicant) and further states that (s)hc is the legal owner of the property to which this application pertains, or that (s)he is the application. T-Ef'0 n f for the legal owner and is duly authorized to make and file this (indicate archilecl,contractor,agent,altonlcy,etc.) Thal all statements contained herein are true to the best of his/her knowledge and belief,and that any work performed,or use conducted at the above captioned property will be in conformance with the details as set forth and contained in this application and in any accompanying approved plans and specifications,as well as in accordance with the New York State Uniform Fire Prevention&Building Code,the Code of the Village of Rye Brook and all other applicable laws,ordinances and regulations. By signing this application, the property owner further declares that he/she has inspected the subject property,and that to the best of his/her knowledge there are no roof drains,sump pumps or other prohibited stormwater or groundwater connections or sources of infiltration into the sanitary sewer system on or from the subject property. Sworn to before me this a b4h Sworn to before me this day of , 20 VR day of C kF7 ,20_ si 2Z _ tat r err ter Signature of Applicant Jonathan Kallmanj N^'Y\k1 Caryn O'Connor Print Name of Property Owner U Print Name of Applicant N ry Public Krl r 1 No ry Public cqn , Notary PuNic, ; w York No. 01 ": Lisa P.Kolba Gun,Iified in Vv ;tChc i r�County NOTARY PUBLIC,State of New York Commission Expiras March 9, 2_0;2� No.01k04916831 Qualified in WestchesteAuto, Term Expires Dec.28, (6) 611/18 This application must be properly completed in its entirety by a N.Y. State Registered Architect or N.Y. State Licensed Professional Engineer & signed by those professionals where indicated. It must also include the notarized signature(s) of the legal owner(s) of the subject property, and the applicant of record in the spaces provided. Any application not properly completed in its entirety and/or not properly signed shall be deemed null and void, and will be returned to the applicant. Please note that application fees are non-refundable. STATE OF NEW YORK,COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER ) as: Johnathan B. Kallman , being duly sworn, deposes and states that he/she is the applicant above named, (print name of individual signing as the applicant) and further states that (s)he is the legal owner of the property to which this application pertains, or that (s)he is the Manager for the legal owner and is duly authorized to make and file this application. (indicate architect,contractor,agent,attorney,etc.) That all statements contained herein are true to the best of his/her knowledge and belief, and that any work performed, or use conducted at the above captioned property will be in conformance with the details as set forth and contained in this application and in any accompanying approved plans and specifications, as well as in accordance with the New York State Uniform Fire Prevention& Building Code, the Code of the Village of Rye Brook and all other applicable laws, ordinances and regulations. By signing this application, the property owner further declares that he/she has inspected the subject property, and that to the best of his/her knowledge there are no roof drains, sump pumps or other prohibited stormwater or groundwater connections or sources of infiltration into the sanitary sewer system on or from the subject property.Sworn to before me this iD Sworn to before me this kC1/5/(9 day of�� , 20j2_ day of C C , 20 S )r e ji;erty Owner Signature o Applicant Tr- nathan B. Kallma ��. Caryn O'Connor Print Name of Property Owner r Print Name of Applicant C.� Notary Pktljc J Notary &ic KELLY SAND!- R Notary Public, State of New York No. 01 SA60036b2 KELLY SANDLER Qualified in Westchester Count Notary Public, S*ate of New York Commission Expires March 9, 20 � No. 01 SA6003882 Qualified in Westchester County Commission Expires March 9, 20" 2D_ 3 6/1/18 This application must be properly completed in its entirety by a N.Y. State Registered Architect or N.Y. State Licensed Professional Engineer & signed by those professionals where indicated. It must also include the notarized signature(s) of the legal owner(s) of the subject property, and the applicant of record in the spaces provided. Any application not properly completed in its entirety and/or not properly signed shall be deemed null and void, and will be returned to the applicant. Please note that application fees are non-refundable. STATE OF NEW YORK,COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER ) as: Johnathan B.Kallman being duly sworn, deposes and states that he/she is the applicant above named, (print name of individual signing as the applicant) and further states that (s)he is the legal owner of the property to which this application pertains, or that (s)he is the Manager for the legal owner and is duly authorized to make and file this application. (indicate archnect,contractor.agent.anorney,etc That all statements contained herein are true to the best of his her knowledge and belief,and that any work performed, or use conducted at the above captioned property will be in conformance with the details as set forth and contained in this application and in any accompanying approved plans and specifications, as well as in accordance with the New York State Uniform Fire Prevention& Building Code, the Code of the Village of Rye Brook and all other applicable laws,ordinances and regulations. By signing this application, the property owner further declares that he/she has inspected the subject property, and that to the best of his her knowledge there are no roof drains,sump pumps or other prohibited stormwater or groundwater connections or sources of infiltration into the sanitary sewer system on or from the subject property. Sworn to before me this Sworn to before me this day of �� , 20 L� day of 0 G' er , 20Jt_ S*kG6 o rtyOwner Signature of Applicant nathan B. Kallma Caryn O'Connor sue( 6V Print Nonw of Property Ovmer Print Name ofAppiicant Notal�Pktic Notary Public KELLY SAC"D' ER Notary Public S,_iie o, New York NO. 01 SA6003862 Lisa R Kolba Qualified in Westchester Count NOTARY PUBLIC,State of New York Commission Expires March 9, 20az No.0104916831 Qualified in Westchester ou Term Expires Dec.28.- 3 b l!IN March 14, 2019 APPROVED 5-0 RESOLUTION APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT AND SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR IMAGINE EARLY LEARNING CENTER IN THE RYE RIDGE SHOPPING CENTER AT PROPERTY LOCATED AT 10 RYE RIDGE PLAZA VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK PLANNING BOARD WHEREAS, Caryn O'Connor, Vice President and Executive Director of Imagine Early Learning Centers ("Applicant"), prospective tenant, on behalf of the property owner, Win Properties, Inc., submitted an Application for approval of a special permit and site plan for a child daycare center at property located at 10 Rye Ridge Plaza in the Cl-P District, R- 2F District and the Bowman Avenue Scenic Roads Overlay District, Section 141.27, Block 1, Lot 7 as shown on the Town of Rye Tax Assessor's Map (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, the Planning Board is the Approval Authority for the applications in accordance with Sections 209-1(A)(2)(d) and 250-31.13 of the Village Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board reviewed the following plans and application materials: 1. Application for Special Permit dated 9/5/18 2. Application for Site Plan Approval dated 9/5/18 3. Site Plan Submittal Review Check List dated 8/30/18 4. Short Environmental Assessment Form (Part 1) dated 8/30/18 and EAF Mapper Summary Report dated 8/29/18 5. Exterior Building Permit Application dated October 26, 2018 6. Sample Daily Chronological In/Out of Children at Jamaica Kids Imagine Early Learning Center, Jamaica, N.Y. dated March 12, 2018 7. Parking Area Photos, no date, prepared by John Meyer Consulting, Armonk, N.Y. 8. Letter to the Planning Board regarding ADA Compliance from John Meyer Consulting, Armonk, N.Y., dated March 4, 2019 9. Letter to the Planning Board and ZBA regarding Traffic and Parking from John Meyer Consulting, Armonk, N.Y., dated January 22, 2019 10. Letter to the Planning Board and ZBA regarding Traffic and Parking from John Meyer Consulting, Armonk, N.Y., dated January 18, 2019 11. Letter to the Planning Board and ZBA regarding Planning Comments from John Meyer Consulting, Armonk, N.Y., dated January 18, 2019 12. Letter to the Rye Brook Board of Trustees from John Meyer Consulting, Armonk, N.Y., dated August 30, 2018 13. Letter to the Rye Brook Superintendent of Public Works regarding Waiver of a Topographic Survey from John Meyer Consulting, Armonk, N.Y., dated January 18, 2019 1313/74/666130v2 3119119 -1- 14. Letter to the Rye Brook Building and Fire Inspector from John Meyer Consulting, Armonk, N,Y., dated November 6, 2018 15. Memorandum to the Planning Board from the Rye Brook Building and Fire Inspector dated October 29, 2018 16. Engineer's Plans prepared by John Meyer Consulting, Armonk, N.Y.: Sheet Number Sheet Title Dated ZC-1 Cover Sheet 8/30/18 rev. 3/04/19 S-1 Overall Existing Site Map 8/30/18 rev. 3/04/19 S-2 Site Plan 8/30/18 rev. 3/14/19 S-3 Plan Enlargement 12/04/18 rev. 3/04/19 S-4 Existing Photo/Architect Plan 12/04/18 rev. 1/18/19 C-900 Construction Details 3/04/19 C-901 Construction Details 3/04/19 ALTA-1 ALTA/ACSM Land Title Survey 7/12/13; and WHEREAS, the application is a Type II Action pursuant to Section 617.5(c)(18) of the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA); and WHEREAS, on February 26, 2019 the application was referred to the Westchester County Department of Planning for notification and a response was received on February 28, 2019; and WHEREAS, on February 5, 2019, the Village of Rye Brook Zoning Board of Appeals granted the following variances: 1. A yard play area variance of 7,736 square feet where the required amount of yard play area for the proposed child daycare center is 11,000 square feet pursuant to Village Code §250-6.H(3)(c) 2. Relief from Village Code §250-6.H(3)(e) which provides that daycare centers with more than 15 children must operate in buildings with fireproof or semifireproof construction as defined by the Building Code of the Village of Rye Brook 3. Relief from Village Code §250-6.H(3)(0 which requires daycare centers to have an off-street dropoff/pickup area capable of storing 55 vehicles simultaneously; and WHEREAS, the Village Planning Consultant, Village Staff and the Planning Board reviewed the information, submitted comments regarding the site plan and made recommendations regarding parking, hours of operation, special permit standards, screening and proposed handicapped access; and WHEREAS, on February 14, 2019, the Planning Board opened a public hearing on the subject application and the public hearing was continued to March 14, 2019, at which times all persons interested were given an opportunity to speak on behalf of or in opposition 131317416661300 3119119 -2- 1 ti to said application, and the Planning Board closed the public hearing on March 14, 2019; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board has considered the general and specific special permit standards for a child daycare center set forth at Village Code §§ 250-6(H)(1)(c)(1), (2) and (3), and 250-6.H(3); and WHEREAS, the Planning Board has considered the Scenic Roads Overlay District standards set forth at Village Code §250-7.F(6); and WHEREAS, the Planning Board is familiar with the site and all aspects of the project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Board hereby finds with respect to the special permit standards set forth at Village Code §250- 6(H)(1)(c)(1), that the proposed use of the child daycare center is of such location, size and character that, in general, it will be in harmony with the appropriate and orderly development of the district in which it is situated and will not be detrimental to the orderly development of adjacent districts; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that with respect to the special permit standards set forth at Village Code §§250-6(H)(1)(c)(2) and (3) the Planning Board hereby finds: 1. With respect to the play area located in the R-2F District, the location and size of the use, the nature and intensity of the operations involved in or conducted in connection with it is such that it will not be hazardous, inconvenient or detrimental to the predominantly residential activities and character of the neighborhood. 2. With respect to the play area located in the R-2F District, the location, nature and height of walls and fences and the nature and extent of landscaping on the site is such that the use will not hinder or discourage the appropriate development and use of adjacent land and buildings or impair the value thereof. 3. The proposed use has provided off-street parking adequate for its needs. 4. With respect to the child daycare center in the C-1P District, the location and size of the use, the nature and intensity of the operations involved in or conducted in connection with it,its size layout and its relationship to streets giving access to it: a. Will be a harmonious part of the commercial district in which it is situated and will not hinder the appropriate development or impair the value thereof, b. Vehicular traffic to and from the use will not be more hazardous than the normal traffic of the district, and c. Its operations will not be objectionable to nearby dwellings by reason of noise, fumes, vibrations or flashing of lights to a greater degree than is normal with respect to the proximity of commercial or industrial uses to residential uses. 1313174166613W 3119119 -3- t i BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that with respect to the specific special permit standards set forth at Village Code §250-6.H(3) regarding child daycare centers, the Planning Board hereby finds: 1. The location, size and character of the child daycare center will be in harmony with the appropriate and orderly development of the neighborhood in which it is situated and will not be detrimental to the value of the property in the neighborhood. 2. The lot on which the child daycare center is proposed to be operated is greater than 0.5 acres in area. 3. The lot does not contain at least 1,000 square feet of suitably fenced rear or side yard play area for each five children or part thereof (i.e. 11,000 square feet total), but on February 5, 2019, the Village of Rye Brook Zoning Board of Appeals granted a 7,736 square foot variance from this requirement. The proposed play area otherwise meets all locational requirements and is proposed to be suitably screened with plantings to avoid a noise nuisance to adjoining properties. 4. The area used for the child daycare center inside the building is on the first floor only and is not less than 35 square feet for each child, exclusive of space in cloakrooms, lavatories, storage rooms or hallways. No basement area will be used for child-care or instructional purposes. 5. On February 5, 2019, the Village of Rye Brook Zoning Board of Appeals granted a variance from the requirement that no more than 15 children shall be in the child daycare center unless the building is if fireproof or semifireproof construction as defined by the Building Code of the Village of Rye Brook. 6. On February 5, 2019, the Village of Rye Brook Zoning Board of Appeals granted a variance from the requirement that the child daycare center shall have an off- street dropoff/pickup area capable of storing the maximum number of vehicles simultaneously delivering and/or collecting children from the facility. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that based on the findings set forth above, the Planning Board hereby approves a special permit as referenced herein authorizing use of the premises as a child daycare center, as shown on the above-listed plans, subject to the following conditions: 1. Pursuant to Section 250-6.H(1)(d), the owner of the property shall submit to the Village annually, on or before January 10 of each year, demonstration of compliance with the conditions of the Special Permit. Demonstration shall consist of an affidavit including a list of the conditions of the special permit and a description of how the site or use conforms to such conditions. 131317416661300 3119119 -4- 2. Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit, the Applicant shall submit documentation acceptable to the Village Attorney which permits the Applicant to use the adjacent parcel to the west for ingress and egress to the play area as shown on the Site Plan. 3. The maximum number of students permitted at the child daycare center shall be 55. 4. The Planning Board notes that a handicap parking space and handicapped accessible ramp is proposed to be located adjacent to the outdoor play area. In the event the Building Inspector determines that the ADA access path from the building to the outdoor play area is no longer required for ADA compliance such pathway, including signage and crosswalk, may be removed from the Site Plan without the need for any further review by the Planning Board. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Planning Board hereby grants a waiver from the requirement for the submission of a current topographic survey and approves the site plan referenced herein for use of the premises as a child daycare center. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that no permits shall be issued until the Applicant has paid to the Village all applicable fees and professional review fees incurred in connection with review of this Application. On motion by Ms. Schoen, seconded by Ms. Drechsler, Mr. Michal Nowak, Superintendent of Public Works/Village Engineer, called the roll: Bea Drechsler Voting AYE John Grzan Voting AYE Sal Morlino Voting EXCUSED Amy Schoen Voting AYE Daniel Tartaglia Voting AYE Adam Zahl Voting EXCUSED Robert Goodman, Chairman Voting AYE 1313/74/66613W 3119119 -5- BUILDI D RTMENT VILLAGt OF R,4,IEROOK D E 938 KIyG S'FRH E-r Ri E BR66k,NY 10573 (914)939A668 FAX(44)939-5801 SEP - 4 2018 wt�w.r o01 �r VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK BUILDING DEPARTMENT FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICATION FEE: $1,150.00 BOT Approval Date: / _�- PB Approval Date: Paid [vj/ Date: �� C ZBA Approval Date: Case# SITE PLAN APPLICATION SUBM ED: Other: Yes [✓� No [ ] Attach Resolution Hereto: BOT[ ] PB[,,/ZBA[ ] {APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT Application dated: � 18 is hereby submitted to the Village of Rye Brook for the issuance ofa Special Permit in accordance with§250-6.H,and any other applicable sections of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook,and as per detailed statement described below.Please note that this application must be accompanied by a complete Site Plan Application,Environmental Assessment Form and all applicable fees in accordance§209 of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook. 1. Site Address: Bowman Avenue & South Ridge Street SBL: 141.27/1/7 Zone: Cl-P 2. Property Owner:Win Properties, Inc. Address:10 Rye Ridge Plaza, Suite 200, Rye Brook, NY Tel: (914) 468-7300 Cell: email: jkallmnn anwinprop.com 3. Applicant: Caryn O'Connor; Imagine Learning Center3 Address: Tel: (646) 734-3859 Cell: email: Caryn@imagineelc.com 4. Attorney: Steve Silverberg Address:220 White Plains Rd.Tarrytown,NY 10591 Tel: (914)682-0707 Cell: email: 5. Engineer/Architect: James A. Ryan, RLA Address: 120 Bedford Road,Armonk, NY 10504 Tel: (914) 273-5225 Cell: email: iryan@jmcpllc.com 6. Current Use of Property: Medical Pediatric Office 7. Proposed Use of Property: Proposed 4,464 s.f. Childcare Center in existing medical office space in Rye Ridge Shopping Center. The use is a permitted use requiring a Special Permit. The proposed child care center will accommodate a maxium of 55 children(9)infants(12)toddlers and(34)pre-school children. The center will have 10-12 staff and operatp 7 am-6-30 prn mnnda!V-fr*daV- There centpr hag a no drop off poficy.,and all parents and carpgiver, must walk children into the center and pick them up. In addition to the use of interior space,there is an outdoor area of approximately 3,264 s.f that is proposed to be used as a fenced outdoor play area. I he location of this proposed area- meets required minimum setbacks of 50',with the closest residential use at 68'. The Village's zoning code also requires 1,000 s.f.of outdoor space for every 5 children;which would required the center to provide 11,000 s.f.for all 55 children. However;the proposed child care center's policy is that only 14-20 children may use the outdoor space at any one time;which if the code is applied using their policy the space required to meet the code would range from 2,800 s.f. to 4,000 s.f.. The proposed 3,264 s.f.is under by 736 s.f.from the required maximum space required,and the applicant is requesting a waiver regarding this requirement. i 6/1/18 ****************************************************************************************** Please note that this application must include the notarized signature(s) of the legal owner(s) of the above-mentioned property, in the space provided below. Any application not bearing the legal property owner's notarized signature(s)shall be deemed null and void, and will be returned to the applicant. *********************************************************************************************************** STATE OF NEW YORK,COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER ) as: Caryn O'Connor ,being duly sworn,deposes and states that he/she is the applicant above named, (print name of individual signing as the applicant) and further states that (s)he is the legal owner of the property to which this application pertains, or that (s)he is the Potential Tenant for the legal owner and is duly authorized to make and file this application. (indicate architect,contractor,agent,attorney,etc.) That all statements contained herein are true to the best of his/her knowledge and belief, and that any work performed,or use conducted at the above captioned property will be in conformance with the details as set forth and contained in this application and in any accompanying approval resolutions,approved plans and specifications,as well as in accordance with the New York State Uniform Fire Prevention&Building Code,the Code of the Village of Rye Brook and all other applicable laws,ordinances and regulations. �' l Sworn to before me this Sworn to before me this J+1 day of� � 1( � , 20 day of , -e j►wf'Jr , 20� h�3�ke��� 1"".— P No u Nota b is ` Si a Owner Signature of Applicant Caryn O'Connor Print Name of Property Owner Print Name of Applicant L Y SANDLEr, J,-, State of h: irk Lisa R Kolba 01 SA6u0386, NOTARY PUBLIC,State of New York bdastchester 'y No,01k0a916831 _ OualHbd in Weetcheater`� :xpires March _�, o^u'n,ty Tartu Expires Dec.28,�-� 2 P:\2018\18124\Adm1n\Applicat1ons\Sp*dal Permit Application 08-28-2018.pdf 6/1/18 BUIL MENT D (► n VI E OF RY OK U V 938 KING ET RYE BR_ ,NY 10573 SEP 'S Z0�$ (914)9 39-5801 VIL RYE g BUI D NG D ROOK EPARTMENT *********************************************************************************************************** FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: BOT Approval Date: PB Approval Date: BOT Disapproval Date: PB Disapproval Date: Attach Resolution Hereto: BOT[ ] PB[14/ZBA[ ] Chairman: ,p tM- SITE PLAN FEE: �— DATE PAID: 1 ( J ENVIRONMENTAL FEE: DATE PAID: OTHER: *********************************************************************************************************** APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL Submission of this application does not assure placement on any Planning Board Agenda.The Applicant will be notified of such placement. *********************************************************************************************************** This application references but is not limited to the following sections of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook; §250 ZONING,§209 SITE PLAN REVIEW,§235 TREES, §107 DEMOLITION OF BUILDINGS, §224 SWIMMING POOLS, §121 EXCAVATION&TOPSOIL REMOVAL,§118 EROSION&SEDIMENT CONTROL,§213 STEEP SLOPES PROTECTION,§219 SUBDIVISION OF LAND, §250-40 NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS.Applicants and their Design Professionals are strongly advised to review the above mentioned code sections online at,www.rvebrook.org prior to completing and/or submitting this application. APPLICATION FEE SCHEDULE: Residential Dwellings- $325,plus$200 per additional dwelling unit. Non-Residential Buildings - $475 plus $30 per parking space. Planned Unit Development-$575 per acre PUD Amendment- $300 Site Plan Amendment- $575 Wetlands&Watercourse- $1,150 Consultant Review(Escrow)Fee: Minimum fee$250-maximum fee$2,500,to be determined by the Village Engineer. Application fees are non-refundable. The applicant's Escrow Account must have a positive balance at all times prior to anv Consultant,Attorney,or Village review. Escrow Fees and Site Plan Fees must be paid on separate checks made payable to the Village of Rye Brook. *********************************************************************************************************** 1. Site Address: 10 Rye Ridge Plaza Parcel ID#: 141.27-17 Zone: C 1-P 2. Property Owner: Win Plaza Address: 10 Rye Ridge Plaza,Suite 200, Rye Brook, NY E-Mail: ikallman@winprop.com Tel.#: (914)468-7300 Other: 3. Applicant: Caryn O'Connor; Imagine Learning Centers Address: (646) 734-3859 E-Mail:Caryn@imagineelc.com Tel.#: Other: 4. Design Professional: James A. Ryan RLA,JMC Planning Engineering Landscape Architecture&Land Surveying PLLC Address: 120 Bedford Road,Armonk, NY 10504 E-Mail: Iryan@jmcpllc.com Tel.#: (914) 273-5225 Other: 5. Designate to whom correspondence is to be sent: Design Professional, Applicant Property Owner Note:If applicant is a`Contract Vendee",please attach a copy of the contract summary with financial and confidential terms deleted. t snits 6. Street which property abuts: Bowman Avenue 9 South Ridge Street 7. Does property connect directly into State or County highway? ( )NO (X)YES: 8. Is site within 500 feet of Village Boundary?( )NO (X)YES if yes note all bordering municipalities: Town/Village of Harrison 9. Total area of site: Parcel B of Win Ridge 4.06 acres Area of site activity: .10 acres 10. Site coverage: Ext_ 93% Pron. 93% %; Building coverage: N/A % 11. Existing building size: N/A New/additional building size: N/A 12. Existing parking spaces: N/A New parking spaces: N/A 13. Nature of proposed activity: Proposed 4,464 s.f.Child Care Center in existing medical office space,which is a permitted use requiring a special use permit. The Center will accommodate a fnaxlmum of 55 children an space of 3,264 for outdoor play activltes,w !c s rom a clos s resldental we ing. a ap !ca t!s a so requesting a waiver for s.f. requirement for outdoor space and loadingg and unloading for parking. ************************************** ********* ** ************************************** Please note that this application must include the notarized signature(s) of the legal owner(s)of the above-mentioned property, in the space provided below. Any application not bearing the legal property owner's notarized signature(s)shall be deemed null and void, and will be returned to the applicant. *********************************************************************************************************** STATE OF NEW YORK,COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER ) as: Caryn O'Connor ,being duly sworn,deposes and states that he/she is the applicant above named, (print name of individual signing as the applicant) and further states that (s)he is the legal owner of the property to which this application pertains, or that (s)he is the Potential Tenant for the legal owner and is duly authorized to make and file this application. (indicate architect,contractor,agent,attorney,etc.) That all statements contained herein are true to the best of his/her knowledge and belief, and that any work performed,or use conducted at the above captioned property will be in conformance with the details as set forth and contained in this application and in any accompanying approved plans and specifications,as well as in accordance with the New York State Uniform Fire Prevention &Building Code,the Code of the Village of Rye Brook and all other applicable laws,ordinances and regulations. Sworn to before me thiss1:54N Sworn to before me this -� day of I PY OQ day of 414 e -,diel- , 20- Notary tart' blic 1gn Pr rty Owner Signature of Applicant Cagn O'Connor P ' t ame of Property Owner Print Name of Applicant KFl LY SANDLER t`lotarY No. 01 Ni , A6003882 St`-Ite Of w York Lisa P.Kolba ouelified in westchester County NOTARY PUBLIC,State of New York Cc,,:;rnission Expires March 9, 20"2Z No.01k04916831 Qualified in Westchester�c(�n°,� Term Expires Dec.28, 2 6/1/18 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK 938 King Street,Rye Brook,N.Y. 10573 (914)939-0753 Fax(914)939-5801 \�ww.ryebrook.ora SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REVIEW CHECKLIST This form shall serve as a checklist for site plan submittal and review by the Village of Rye Brook. The use of this plan review checklist by the applicant is to ensure compliance with the technical provisions of§209 of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook entitled, Site Plan Review, pertaining to preliminary and final plan preparation. The Village Code is available on the Village Website at: www.ryebrook.org. Prior to the appearance before ANY meeting or hearing of the Planning Board,the applicant must comply with all Notification Requirements of Code Section 250-40. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL SHALL INCLUDE: 1. APPLICATIONS. Completed and signed including correspondences. 2. CHECKLIST. Completed and signed. 3. PLANS. Signed, Sealed & Dated. Three paper (3) copies and one (1) electronic version. One (1) record set with original signatures, dates and seals shall be provided and submitted with two (2) copies that clearly indicate the signatures,dates,and seals shown on the record set. 4. FEES: All application fees and Environmental fee. A separate check for filing fee and Environmental fee. 5. Environmental Assessment Form. Form available on the NYS DEC website and mapper. 6. Electronic Copy. Complete copy of all plans and shall be submitted electronically at time of submission. 7. Notaerzfffidavit of Si os ' g& Mail Notification. I, ­ - Applicant's signature) have read the Notification Requirements of Code Section 250-40 and will provide notification as required. IDENTIFICATION OF APPLICANT(S): Identification of Applicant: Imagine Early Learning Center Applicant: Ms. Caryn O'Connor Address: 250 Bedford Park Blvd. West, Bronx, NY 10468 Tel. #: (646) 734-3859 Fax: E-Mail: caryn@imagineelc.com Project Name: Imagine Early Learning Center Day Care Center Project Address: 10 Rye Ridge Plaza / Rye Brook, NY Current Property Owner: Win Plaza Address:_10 Rye Ridge Plaza, Suite 200, Rye Brook, NY 10573 Tel. #: (914) 468-7300 Fax: (914) 468-7330 E-Mail: jkallman@winprop.com IDENTIFICATION OF PROPERTY: Identifying Title: Rye Ridge Shopping Center Tax Designation: Section: 141.27 Block: 1 Lot: 7 Parcel B Zoning District: C1-P Street which property abuts: Bowman Avenue & South Ridge Street Plan Submission Date: 08/30/2018 Site Plan Checklist Pagel of 7 6/1/18 Project Address 10 Rye Ridge Plaza V N NA PLAN REQUIREMENTS Q 00 3 copies of plans prepared and signed by a registered Land Surveyor,Engineer or Architect. 01 O O One(1)electronic copy of all submitted plans and surveys. O O Q Topographic Survey stamped by New York State Land Surveyor with license number and seal. O O Q Topographic survey scale of one(1)inch per twenty(20)feet or larger. O O Q Section, block and lot numbers of the property taken from the latest tax records along with a copy of the most recent property card on file with the Town of Rye Tax Assessor's office. O O Q Name of the proposed subdivision plan. §1 O O Name and address of the owner of record. Q O O Name and address of the applicant. O O Q Deed reference(s). Q O O Names, addresses and signature of every Engineer, Architect, Land Surveyor or Soil Scientist whose professional seal appears on any site plan submitted to the Board. 10 O O North arrow and scale. O O Q Location map at the minimum scale of 1"equals 1,000 feet. O O Q Area of all lots,in square feet. O O X Engineering notes on plans as stated in application packages. O O Q Copies of all existing and proposed deed restrictions or covenants applying to the property, including, but not limited to, covenants and agreements restricting the use and establishing future ownership and maintenance responsibilities for all private roads,recreation,and open space areas. O O O Any prior land use approvals with respect to the subject property. 000 Date the plans were first drafted. Any revision(s)made to any of the sheets first submitted are to be so noted in the revision block. The revision block is to be placed on the originals of the revised sheets. Additional paper copies are to be made& submitted for the Planning Board&Building Dept.to replace those sheets previously submitted. 10 00 Other existing site improvements,including,but not limited to,fences,landscape or retaining walls,landscaping & screening. 0100 Location of all buildings and structures on the premises and approximate location of all neighboring buildings or structures within 100 feet of the lot line. IQ O O Fees paid to The Village of Rye Brook Building Department. O O 10 Any revisions to plans shall be identified with a revision cloud and numbered revision triangle V N NA ABUTTING PROPERTY INFORM TION O O Q The names and addresses of all abutting property owners within 250 ft as indicated in the Municipal records. O O Q Zoning and use of abutting properties noted on plans. 01 O O Shape,size,height and location of existing buildings and driveways within one hundred(100)feet of the site. O O Q Location and description of existing easements within one hundred(100)feet of the site. O O 10 Location of existing private or public trails within one hundred(100)feet of the site. Q O O Location of existing roads,scenic roads and/or driveways within two hundred(200)feet of the site. Q O O Location of proposed parkland.If none state nearest recreation facility O O 10 Location of existing septic system leach fields within two hundred(200)feet of the site. O O Q Locations,dimensions,grades and flow direction of existing sewers,culverts,waterlines as well as other underground utilities within and adjacent to the property. Site Plan Checklist Page 2 of 7 6/1/18 Project Address 10 Rye Ridge Plaza 200 The location of all existing watercourses,intermittent streams,wetland areas and springs,consistent with the definitions set forth in Chapter 245,Wetlands and Watercourses,of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook. V N NA PROPOSED SITE PLAN INFORMATION 0 O O Sufficient, acceptable information to readily determine the location, bearing, and length of every street line, lot line, and property boundary line. O O 10 Location of all building setback lines. 0 O O Topographic data at a minimum contour interval of 2'-0"increments,showing existing and proposed contours on the property and extending a minimum of 25 feet into all adjacent properties. 2 O O The location and characteristics of the different areas of vegetation,including the identification of all individual trees 12 or more inches in diameter at breast height("DBH"),protected trees of any size, as well as stands of trees and wooded areas, within areas of proposed disturbance, consistent with the provisions of Chapter 235,Trees,of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook. O O 0 Location and proposed development of all buffer areas,including existing vegetative cover. O O V Location and description of any zoning district and municipal boundaries including a zoning compliance chart for the existing and proposed lots. O O 0 Shape,size,height and location of all existing and proposed buildings. 6 O O Location and description of any existing and proposed easements. 0 O O Location and dimensions of all existing and proposed streets,driveways,sidewalks,parking spaces,bicycle parking, loading areas and other facilities associated with the proposed use. O O 10 Identification of the location and amount of building area proposed for retail sales or similar commercial activity. O O 0 Location of existing and proposed utilities(water,sewer,gas,electrical,telephone,oil tank etc.). O O 0 Design and location of all existing and proposed wells,septic tanks and leach field systems,or methods of waste water disposal. IQ O O Location,type and size of all existing and proposed landscaping and screening including fences and walls. O O 1 Location,size and proposed screening of outdoor storage areas,if any. O O It Location, design and construction material of all existing or proposed site improvements, including drains, culverts, retaining walls,landscape walls and fences. O O 0 Exterior lighting plan and proposed signs to be located on site,including sign orientation,size,height,and elevation view. O O 0 Storm drainage plan and plans for snow removal and storage. O O 0 Pedestrian and automobile circulation plan. O O 01 Construction drawings for pavements,walks,steps,curbing,drainage&other structures associated with the proposed use. O O 0 Erosion and sedimentation control plan,including installation details of proposed control measures,directive construction notations and a schedule for the installation and maintenance of proposed control measure. O O 0 Description of measures planned to assure proper erosion and sedimentation control in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 118 entitled"Erosion and Sediment Control,"of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook. O O 0 Drawing and computation for storm water detention design for a 25-year storm in accordance with the Westchester County Best Management Practices O O $ Rock outcroppings and areas of steep slope consistent with the definitions set forth in Chapter 213,Steep Slope Protection, of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook. O O 0 Location of any common lands and/or public lands. O O 0 Phasing or an estimated project construction schedule. O O 0 Supporting documents,including deeds,maintenance,condominium agreements,etc. Site Plan Checklist Page 3 of 7 6/1/18 Project Address 10 Rye Ridge Plaza O O IP Location of proposed construction or area of disturbance and its relationship to any property line, easement, building, structure, road, wall, fence, sewage disposal system, well, wetland feature or tree exceeding six inches in diameter measured at a height of four feet from the ground O O 0 Estimate of earthwork showing the quantity of any material to be imported to and/or removed from the site including a chart with the number/species and size of any trees to be removed. 0091 Location and size of areas of soils by soil types in the area of proposed disturbance and to a distance of 100 feet surrounding the area of disturbance. O O 0 Cross sections of steep slope areas. O O 2 Retaining walls or like constructions,with details of construction. O O 0 Approximate boundaries of any areas subject to flooding or stormwater overflows,including areas of special flood hazard and coastal high-hazard areas, consistent with the definitions set forth in Chapter 130, Flood Damage Prevention, of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook.Approximate Wetlands and wetland buffer boundaries shall be clearly delineated. O O 10 Location of fire and other emergency zones,including the location of fire hydrants. O O q[ Studies to include,but not necessarily limited to: environmental impact analysis,wildlife,traffic,stormwater management,recreation,public service,fiscal impact,visual impact and historic significance documentation,or a written request to waive the submission requirements for these studies. O O qI Amount of any bonds required. O O Amount of excavated material to be removed from site,if any. Y N NA OTHER(as applicable) O O It Record of application for and approval status of all necessary permits from state and county officials and local utility companies. O O 2 Identification of any federal,state or county permits required for the project's execution,including project referrals, if any,&environmental review procedures mandated by Article 8,Environmental Quality Review,of the Environmental Conservation Law(SEQRA). O O Any other information felt necessary by the Planning Board to allow the Board to proceed with consideration&to make an informed decision. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CHECKLIST WESTCHESTER COUNTY PLANNING BOARD Notice to Applicants/Developers: At some point during the development review process your project may be referred to the Westchester County Planning Board for review and comment in accordance with state and county laws that require local planning boards, zoning boards of appeals and governing bodies to refer certain development applications to the County Planning Board. Referral to the County Planning Board may not occur until your project has progressed well along through the design process. Since the Planning Board's comments may impact project design,this checklist is provided to encourage early consideration of these areas of concern by applicants to avoid project changes later. For information on the County Planning Board review process and to access an electronic copy of this checklist, go online to www.westchestergov.com/planningreferrals or contact Lukas Herbert at lah5@westchestergov.com. I.COUNTY PLANNING BOARD POLICIES: Written policies underlie all recommendations of the County Planning Board. Westchester 2025-Context for County and Municipal Planning and Policies to Guide County Planning,adopted by the County Planning Board on 5/6/08,amended 115110,can be found at ww.westchestergov.com/2025. ❑ Westchester 2025:Policies should be reviewed to determine how they relate to the development proposal. II.IMPACTS TO COUNTY FACILITIES AND SERVICES: The County Planning Board coordinates the review of development projects with Westchester County departments to identify and address potential impacts on County services and infrastructure.In some situations,permits and approvals may be required that could change project design. Site Plan Checklist Page 4 of 7 6/1/18 Project Address 10 Rye Ridge Plaza ❑ Map of County Facilities: Review the State& County Roads and Parks map(which also includes county channel lines)to identify proximity to County facilities at: www.westchestergov.com/planningdocs/pdf naps/countystateroadsparks.pdf. Other useful map links for information about environmental features, septic/sewer map, county sewer districts map, etc can be found at: www.westchestergov.com/maps ❑ COUNTY ROAD: Applications for development on sites that abut a County road must be submitted for review by the County Department of Public Works. Information and forms can be found at: www.westchestergov.com/dpw/bldgperm.htm. Former County Roads do not need review by the Department of Public Works,but will still likely trigger a review by the County Planning Board. ❑ COUNTY CHANNEL LINES: Applications for development on sites within 100 feet of a designated County Channel Line require a stream control permit from the County Department of Public Works. Information and forms can be found at: www.westchestergov.com/dpw/bldgperm.htm ❑ COUNTY PARK: New construction & land alteration projects adjacent to County parks are expected to address screening& buffer of new uses from the park, as appropriate. Stormwater should not drain from a developed site onto a County park without acceptable quantity and quality controls.County parks are designated as Critical Environmental Areas. ❑ SEWAGE TREATMENT AT COUNTY TREATMENT PLANT: Local municipalities are required to reduce and eliminate inflow and infiltration(I&I)into the sanitary sewage systems tributary to County treatment plants.New development will be expected to reduce I&I in relation to generation of new flow at a ratio of three to one. This requirement must be discussed with local officials. ❑BEE-LINE BUS SERVICE: Bee-Line bus stops serving a development site should be identified on plans or noted if located off-site. If a bus stop is located along the site's frontage, the applicant should contact the County Department of Transportation to discuss impacts and the need for improvements. Safe and separate pedestrian access should be provided to link a bus stop and sidewalk with building entrances. Information on County bus service and design guidelines can be found at: westchestergov.com/transportati on/imagesBus%20Service%2OGuidelines.pdf ❑FAIR AND AFFORDABLE HOUSING: Many municipalities require inclusion of fair & affordable units in new developments. Financial assistance to achieve fair & affordable housing development is available through Westchester County & other sources. Applications that include new residential units to be affirmatively marketed& sold or rented subject to fair& affordable housing provisions should be tied to Westchester County guidelines on affordability including income guidelines of eligible households that can be found at: http://homes.westchestergov.com/. If County funding is sought to develop fair & affordable housing,the County Board of Legislators must be included as an involved agency under SEQR. ❑RECYCLING: New buildings must contain a designated area of sufficient size for separation and storage of recyclables and trash. Building expansions should also include sufficient space for separation and storage of recyclables. For more information about County recycling requirements go to:www.westchestergov.com/enviromnent—recycling.htm ❑STORM SEWER SYSTEM: Any connections to a County storm sewer line will require a permit from the Department of Public Works in accordance with the County Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination (IDDE) law. Information & forms can be found at:www.westchestergov.com/dpw/bldgperm.htm Non-stormwater discharges to the County storm sewer system are prohibited. III. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS The County Planning Board's land use policies focus attention on several aspects of development that may have intermunicipal and quality of life impacts.The list below includes areas most frequently commented on by the County Planning Board. ❑WATER: All development plans should include sufficient provisions for stormwater management, water quality measures and mitigation of flooding. ❑Plans should identify the major drainage basin or watershed the site is located in (Croton River, Upper Hudson River, Lower Hudson,Upper Long Island Sound, Bronx River and Lower Long Island Sound). An interactive map with watershed boundaries can be found at www.westchestergov.com/planning/maps&lists/drainbasinsl1xI7.html ❑Watershed plans have been developed for several of the County's watersheds - the Croton, Indian Brook-Croton Gorge, Bronx River & Long Island Sound watersheds - that include specific recommendations that apply to development projects. See recommendations in watershed plans at:planning.westchestergov.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id= 1231& Itemid=2204 Site Plan Checklist Page 5 of 7 6/1/18 Project Address 10 Rye Ridge Plaza ❑Development that involves filling, creation of impervious surfaces or buildings and substantive loss of natural vegetation in a floodplain or flood prone area should be avoided. ❑Above ground, vegetated retention/detention basins or devices are preferred because they perform better, are easier to inspect and maintain and provide additional environmental benefits over subsurface structural devices. Any such treatments should not be constructed within wetlands or buffer areas around wetlands. ❑The development should treat and retain as much stormwater on-site as possible,particularly when the site is located in a drainage basin with known flooding problems. A Construction Stormwater Toolbox with tools and sources of technical information related to the construction activities and stormwater management best practices is available from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation at:www.dec.ny.gov/chemical/8694.htm1 ❑New development should include protection of aquatic resources. For more information about protection of aquatic resourc-es& buffer areas,go to:planning.westchestergov.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1491&Itemid=2458 ❑Impervious cover should be minimized. Permeable paving surfaces should be used where feasible.Vegetative rain gardens should be used,particularly in areas of overland or channelized stormwater flow,to improve stormwater quality and reduce runoff volume. For more information,go to: www.westchestergov.com/stormwater ❑Buildings along coastlines and low lying area should consider the impacts of sea level rise. Specific consideration is required of potential impacts to surface and subsurface drinking water supplies. ❑ SITE LAYOUT.Aesthetic design,building orientation and community character should be considered in the site layout and building appearance. ❑In most locations,buildings should face the street and have pedestrian access from the street. ❑Commercial buildings should be located near the front street line with the majority of parking located in the rear of the building. Even gas stations and convenience stores should be upfront in a landscaped setting with parking,pumps and canopy toward the rear. El Buildings should be of pedestrian-scale when seen from the sidewalk. ❑Building facades should contribute to and enhance the character of the community. ❑Driveway and pathway connections should be provided to adjacent sites when possible and crosseasements provided. ❑ STREETS.Street design should reduce unwarranted paving and promote connectivity. ❑New streets should connect with adjacent streets wherever feasible to prevent the proliferation of dead-end streets and promote neighborhood integration. ❑Connections could be vehicular or pedestrian/bicycle only,where appropriate. ❑Street widths should be minimized for streets with low traffic volume to reduce speeds and impervious surfaces.Lane widths of 12 feet are only appropriate for major roadways. ❑Driveway widths should be no more than 9 feet to reduce impervious surfaces. ❑Permeable paving surfaces should be used where feasible. ❑ GREEN TECHNOLOGY.New development should include as many green building elements as possible,such as:renewable building materials,energy efficient heating/cooling systems and fixtures,water saving devices,green roofs and permeable paving surfaces. Information can be obtained from the U.S.Green Building Council at:www.usgbc.org. ❑ LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING.The site improvements should enhance community character. Site Plan Checklist Page 6 of 7 6/1/18 s Project Address_10 Rye Ridge Plaza ❑ Landscaping should consist of native plant species appropriate for the location.Invasive plant species should be prohibited. Invasive plant information available at:www.westchestergov.com/planning/environmental/Reports/InvasivePlantsBrochO8.pdf ❑ Pollutant tolerant plantings should effectively shield parking,loading areas and refuse collection sites. ❑ Site lighting should be provided at the lowest safe levels and lowest heights,avoiding all spillage off site. ❑ PEDESTRIANS. Safe,convenient and ADA accessible pedestrian access is provided. ❑ A sidewalk should be provided along the site frontage along each street. ❑ Direct pedestrian connections should be made from the front of the building to the sidewalk.Pedestrian crossings of drive-ways& parking lots should be minimized or avoided. If they must be provided,painted crosswalks should be provided through parking lots. ❑ ADA accessibility must be provided. ❑ BICYCLISTS.Provisions for bicyclists should be incorporated into project design. ❑ Bicycle parking should be provided in commercial and residential developments.Guidelines can be found at: www.apbp.org/resourcelresmgr/publication s(bicycle_parking_guidelines.pdf ❑ If near a trailway or bicycle route,extra consideration should be given to bicycle accessibility such as bike lanes on internal roadways,bicycle parking and other amenities. ❑ Drive-thru lanes at uses such as banks and fast-food restaurants should also be accessible for bicycles. Waiver: Upon finding by the Building hispector, Village Engineer, Planning Board or Board of Trustees that, due to the particular character or limited nature of development or change in use or to special conditions peculiar to a site,the submission of a final site plan,or certain portions of information normally required as part of the site development plan,is inappropriate or unnecessary or that strict compliance with said submission requirements will cause extraordinary and unnecessary hardship,such official or Board may waive such submission requirements wherever, in the opinion of such official or Board, such waiver will be consistent with the goal of promoting the public health, safety and general welfare of the community.The findings for granting such waiver shall become a part of the public record. Any waiver request must be made in writing,and include sufficient detailed information for the appropriate authority to make an informed decision. Design Professional's Certification of Completion of Checklist I have fully reviewed the Village of Rye Brook's requirements and certify this application to be a complete submission. I understand that an incomplete plat or incomplete checklist shall be deemed an incomplete submission and shall be returned to the applicant upon determination of such by the appropriate authority. Name(Print) James Ryan Signature Date 8/30/18 Pro 'Seal Site Plan Checklist Page 7 of 7 6/1/18 p:\2018\18171\ADMIN\APPLICATIONS.Site Plan Full 08-28-2018.pd1 Short Environmental Assessment Form Part 1 -Project Information Instructions for Completing Part 1-Project Information. The applicant or project sponsor is responsible for the completion of Part 1. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding,are subject to public review,and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part I based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item,please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information. Complete all items in Part 1. You may also provide any additional information which you believe will be needed by or useful to the lead agency;attach additional pages as necessary to supplement any item. Part 1 - Project and Sponsor Information Name of Action or Project: Imagine Early Learning Center(Child Care Centers) Project Location(describe,and attach a location map): Child Care Center in existing Medial Office Space @ 10 Ridge Ridge Plaza,Suite 26,Rye Brook,NY 10573(Location Map Attached) Brief Description of Proposed Action: Approval of 4,464 s.f.change of use from medical office space to Child Care Center which is a permitted use requiring a special use permit. The center will accommodate a maximum of 55 children(9)infants,(12)toddlers and(34)pre-school children. There will be 10-12 staff members and the hours of operation will be from 7:00 am-6:30 pm Monday through Friday. The center has a"no-drop off"policy which requires all parents and/or caregivers to walk children into the center and pick them up. In addition,there is proposed outdoor space use of 3,264 for outdoor recreation,which meets minimum setback requirements to residential dwellings. Name of Applicant or Sponsor: Telephone: (646)734-3859 Caryn O'Connor E-Mail: ryn ima ineelc.com @� 9 Address: 250 Bedford Park Blvd.West City/PO: State: Zip Code: Bronx NY 10468 1.Does the proposed action only involve the legislative adoption of a plan,local law,ordinance, NO YES administrative rule,or regulation? If Yes,attach a narrative description of the intent of the proposed action and the environmental resources that may be affected in the municipality and proceed to Part 2. If no,continue to question 2. 2. Does the proposed action require a permit,approval or funding from any other governmental Agency? NO YES If Yes,list agency(s)name and permit or approval: ❑ Village of Rye Brook Board of Trustee,Special Use Permit New York State Office of Children and Family Services(NYSOCF) 3.a.Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? 4.006 acres b.Total acreage to be physically disturbed? .10 acres c.Total acreage(project site and any contiguous properties)owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? +/-13.20 acres 4. Check all land uses that occur on,adjoining and near the proposed action. ❑Urban ❑Rural(non-agriculture) [:]Industrial m Commercial ®Residential(suburban) El Forest ❑Agriculture ❑Aquatic ❑Other(specify): m Parkland Page 1 of 3 5. Is the proposed action, NO YES N/A a.A permitted use under the zoning regulations? ❑ ❑ ❑ b.Consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan? ❑ 0 ❑ 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the predominant character of the existing built or natural NO YES landscape? ❑ ❑ 7. Is the site of the proposed action located in,or does it adjoin,a state listed Critical Environmental Area? NO YES If Yes,identify: ❑ ❑ 8. a.Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels? NO YES b.Are public transportation service(s)available at or near the site of the proposed action? ❑ ❑ c.Are any pedestrian accommodations or bicycle routes available on or near site of the proposed action? 12 9.Does the proposed action meet or exceed the state energy code requirements? NO YES If the proposed action will exceed requirements,describe design features and technologies: ❑ ❑ N/A 10. Will the proposed action connect to an existing public/private water supply? NO YES If No,describe method for providing potable water: ❑ 21 11.Will the proposed action connect to existing wastewater utilities? NO YES If No,describe method for providing wastewater treatment: ❑ 12. a.Does the site contain a structure that is listed on either the State or National Register of Historic NO YES Places? ❑✓ ❑ b.Is the proposed action located in an archeological sensitive area? ✓ 13.a.Does any portion of the site of the proposed action,or lands adjoining the proposed action,contain NO YES wetlands or other waterbodies regulated by a federal,state or local agency? b.Would the proposed action physically alter,or encroach into,any existing wetland or waterbody? El Yes,identify the wetland or waterbody and extent of alterations in square feet or acres: 14. Identify the typical habitat types that occur on,or are likely to be found on the project site. Check all that apply: ❑Shoreline ❑Forest ❑Agricultural/grasslands ❑Early mid-successional ❑ Wetland ®Urban ®Suburban 15.Does the site of the proposed action contain any species of animal,or associated habitats,listed NO YES by the State or Federal government as threatened or endangered? 0 ❑ 16.Is the project site located in the 100 year flood plain? NO YES 17.Will the proposed action create storm water discharge,either from point or non-point sources? NO YES If Yes, Z ❑ a.Will storm water discharges flow to adjacent properties? ❑NO [—]YES b.Will storm water discharges be directed to established conveyance systems runoff and storm drains)? If Yes,briefly describe: ENO ❑YES Page 2 of 3 18.Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that result in the impoundment of NO YE water or other liquids(e.g.retention pond,waste lagoon,dam)? If Yes,explain purpose and size: 19.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the location of an active or closed NO YES solid waste management facility? If Yes,describe: 7 ❑ 20.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the subject of remediation(ongoing or NO YES completed)for hazardous waste? If Yes,describe: a ❑ I AFFIRM THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Applicant/sponsor name: James A.Ryan,RLA Date: 08/30/18 Signature: .rrrZ„ PRINT FORM Page 3 of 3 7 EAF Mapper Summary Report Wednesday, August 29, 2018 5:04 PM Disclaimer: The EAF Mapper is a screening tool intended to assist i l� project sponsors and reviewing agencies in preparing an environmental 441 27-1-10 assessment form(EAF).Not all questions asked in the EAF are 135.82-1 2'.1 k141.27-1-9 \ , answered b the EAF Ma y35.82-12.3 135.82-1-1 y peer.Additional information on an EAF �-,-5141,.271-17 question can be obtained by consulting the EAF Workbooks. Although 141,27-1-12 ' the EAF Mapper provides the most up-to-date digital data available to 14 . 8 1 y 6 rt DEC,you may also need to contact local or other data sources in order 141�26 1 3 a�41.27-1-3q to obtain data not provided by the Mapper.Digital data is not a 141.26-1-2~ ��yy141126 141.2 7-t-27 substitute for agency determinations. 1.412 6-1-11i4�� r 1't 141'27-1=28 -14142 6-.1-1.1 ` Y '► 2 �' 1 141.2 7 1 2 9 ltlaira Monlral j 141 26-1 .1.15 rr,,rr's 141.26-1-1'.1 Y �J41.26 1 1 1M:2.7r1-16 1 lL.27- -45 t - 141.'.27-1-55 � I 05 45. 6 141-27-1-3 Toronto j 1.41-27 Ip_ / Rodwsst r • 1� t 141. 1,41.35,2 1 ti Molt r: A�xIY Boston ^�� 141.35 2 361 Hamm � -1 45st_4_1t, 5-�38 t t— tEdA^;� eZr_'n USal 35 2 40 Clevelmd ;Providence 1413 ?� � err ,N ,Esri 0545. 33.141 �- -r., � E,Garmin, sn,- J�sr r ? o4f�lsri34! Sauces: ri. Piittsburgh (t rColumbua USGI6tlloti W4dp.INCREMENT 0545. 790545. 78 ►{fir 1 2apd � S "3r P.NikCar,Esri Japan METI, 0 45. 77 �4G; flrrli i 1 ti1�35 2-31 clnnati wa�l4gDi 9 f ra;Han lCor9)•Esri r- i 141.35 2 Part 1 /Question 7 [Critical Environmental No Area] Part 1 /Question 12a [National Register of No Historic Places] Part 1 /Question 12b [Archeological Sites] No Part 1 /Question 13a [Wetlands or Other Yes- Digital mapping information on local and federal wetlands and Regulated Waterbodies] waterbodies is known to be incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. Part 1 /Question 15 [Threatened or No Endangered Animal] Part 1 /Question 16 [100 Year Flood Plain] Yes Part 1 /Question 20 [Remediation Site] No Short Environmental Assessment Form - EAF Mapper Summary Report AFFIDAVIT OF MAR - 5 2019 LEGAL NOTICE VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK BUILDING DEPARTMENT I hereby swear that the following notice was given with a 3' x 4' sign of Public Notice erected two weeks prior hearing date: NOTICE IS HEREBY Given that the undersigned has filed an application to appear before the Planning Board of the Village of Rye Brook. Application # 18-026 Owner: Win Ridge Realty LLC 24 Rye Ridge Plaza Rye Brook, New York 10170 Applicant: Caryn O'Connor, Imagine Learning Center 250 Bedford Park Boulevard West Bronx, New York 10468 Applicant Proposes to: Operate a Child Day-Care Facility. At the premises known as 10 Rye Ridge Plaza Suite 26 in the Village of Rye Brook, New York, situated on the West side of South Ridge Street, at the intersection of Bowman Avenue and South Ridge Street, designated and shown on the most current tax map as Parcel ID# 141.27-1-7. The applicant has been granted the following variance(s) of the Zoning Ordinance: §250-6.H.(3)(c): The amount of required yard play area for this child day care center is 11,000 square feet. The applicant is proposing to provide 3,264 square feet of yard play area. Therefore a yard play area variance of 7, 736 square feet is requested or an interpretation. §250-6.H.(3)(e): The center shall not have more than 15 children in any case, except if the building is of fireproof or semi-fireproof construction as defined by the Building Code of the Village of Rye Brook. The applicant is proposing to have 55 children in the existing shopping center building which is not of fireproof or semi-fireproof construction as defined by the Building Code of the Village of Rye Brook. Therefore an interpretation of this section of the code is requested. §250-6.H.(33)(f): The center shall have an off-street drop-off/pickup area capable of storing 55 vehicles simultaneously delivering and/or collecting children from this facility. The applicant is providing no dedicated off-street drop-off/pickup area. Therefore an interpretation and relief from this section of the code is requested. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the Village of Rye Brook Planning Board will hold a Public Hearing in the Village, 938 King Street, Rye Brook, New York, on Thursday March 14, 2019 at 7:30 p.m. (or soon thereafter), when any person may be heard in favor of or against the Imagine Early Learning Centers site plan application associated with an approved use for a child care center in medical offices at Suite 26, 10 Rye Ridge Plaza and proposed 3,500 s.f. outdoor play area. The property is located at 10 Rye Ridge Plaza, Suite 26 and known on the Rye Brook Tax Maps as 141-27-1-7 and located within the C I-P Zoning District. (Applicant's Representative Signature) c P L LC_, (Applicant's Representative Name/Company) Sworn before me at day of Al G Z c) (Notary Public) Encl.: Lisa P.Kolba NOTARY PUBLIC,State of New York Photo of Sign No.01k04916831 p\2018\18124\admin\ idavit o docx Qualified in`.Vestchester County, f moilin S Term Expires Dec.28, t �t tiF Y- y PUBLICNOTICE' -. :. A IPUBl1C NEARING1MEF[INGI FOR A PLANNING BOARD APPLICATION Will BE MELD BY THE = = BYE BROOK Planning Board manMWIA at 7:30 P.M. ON OCH14,2019 AT THE RYE BROOK VILLAGE HALL, _ 938 (LING STREET j ADDITIONAL INFORMATION iS AVAILABLE AT THE IENT RYE BROOK BUIIDIKG BEPARTI 1939-06681 l F t^ �•r - a y� t i 4 F � AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING LEGAL NOTICE I hereby swear that the following notice was given by personal service, first class mail to the property owners listed below, at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing date also a 3' x 4' sign of Public Notice was erected two weeks prior hearing date: NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the Village of Rye Brook Planning Board will hold a Public Hearing in the Village, 938 King Street, Rye Brook, New York, on Thursday February 14, 2019 at 7:30 p.m. (or soon thereafter), when any person may be heard in favor of or against the Imagine Early Learning Centers site plan application associated with an approved use for a child care center in medical offices at Suite 26, 10 Rye Ridge Plaza and proposed 3,500 s.f. outdoor play area. The property is located at 10 Rye Ridge Plaza, Suite 26 and known on the Rye Brook Tax Maps as 141- 27-1-7 and located within the C I-P Zoning District. Ceja,Claudio The Pointe Development Group Yumart Felix O 44 Roanoke Ave 10 The Pointe 49 Roanoke Ave PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 Magri John& Lanza,Anthony The Pointe Development Group Nadine 46 Roanoke Ave 7 The Pointe 39 Westview Ave PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 The Pointe Development Group Win Ridge Shopping Ctr De-LLC Lucero Saul 2 The Pointe S. Ridge St 38 Roanoke Ave PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 The Pointe Development Group The Pointe Development Group Current Occupant 6 The Pointe 5 The Pointe PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 Morgese Diane The Pointe Development Group Win Plaza-De LLC 35 Westview Ave Bowman Ave Bowman Ave PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 Marini,Enrico The Pointe Development Group The Pointe Development Group 42 Roanoke Ave 9 The Pointe 1 The Pointe PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 Westchester County Westchester County Port Chester-Rye Ufs Distist#4 Bowman Bowman 113 Bowman Ave PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 Win Plaza-De LLC Manfredonia,George Suriano Christopher J Roanoke Ave 37 Westview Ave 40 Roanoke Ave PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 Urban,Julia Bowman III Llc The Pointe Development Group 47 Roanoke Ave 111 Bowman Ave 4 The Pointe PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 The Pointe Development Group Licare,Victoria Guglielmo,Giuseppe 3 The Pointe 36 Roanoke Ave 32 Westview Ave PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 bw (Applicant's Representative Signatu ) :1\_�Cl (Applicant's Representative Name/Company) Sworn before me at day of KIMBERLY ROMANINO N6tAItV PUBLIC-STA1f OF NEW VOW (Notary Public) No. OIRO6134291 Ci oohed in Putnam County, Encl.: Map My d0M-_*•�',)n Expires September 26,,RAa\ Photo of Sign p:\2018\18124\admin\afdavit of mailing planning board 01-19-2019.docx r 1N3W1H�id3H SHL011O8 HDOHB 3A8 3H111i 31011M SI NOIIVWHO3NI WHO111110V 133HIS UNIX 8£6 '»VH 3Jn1I1A Noo88 JA8 In IV 'W'd OU le 610VOL k4unum No PeoH fiutuuetd HOOIAg 3JlH ]HI All O11HMt111M NQllV31lddti oaVp8 oNINHVld U131 [9KIJLII 1/SNlHV3H 31180d] n oil '131 lAI 3118nd 12/19/2018 Westchester County GIS::Tax Parcel Maps Tax Parcel Maps Address: Bowman Ave Print Key: 141.27-1-7 SBL: 14102700010070000000 0 - - r 20 % i 1 per- y_ � .���� • � �! � , a rep wo— ssMM Disclaimer: This tax parcel map is provided as a public service to Westchester County residents for general information and planning purposes only, and should not be relied upon as a sole informational source. The County of Westchester hereby disclaims any liability from the use of this GIS mapping system by any person or entity. Tax parcel boundaries represent approximate property line location and should NOT be interpreted as or used in lieu of a survey or property boundary description. Property descriptions must be obtained from surveys or deeds. For more information please contact the assessor's office of the municipality. https://giswww.westchestergov.com/taxmaps/layout.aspx?r-RYK213896 1/1 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK AUG ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS 7 20ig RESOLUTION VILLAGE CLERK'S OFF SCE WHEREAS, on February 5, 2019 the Village of Rye Brook Zoning Board of Appeals granted Caryn O'Connor, on behalf of Imagine Learning Center (the "Applicant") (1) a yard play area variance of 7,736 square feet where the required amount of yard play area for the proposed child day care center is 11,000 square feet pursuant to Village Code § 250-6.H.(3)(c); (2) relief from § 250-6.H(3)(e) of the Village Code which provides that day care centers with more than 15 children must operate in buildings with fireproof or semi fireproof construction as defined by the Building Code of the Village of Rye Brook; and (3) relief from § 250-6.H.(3)(f) of the Village Code which requires day care centers to have an off-street drop—off/pickup area capable of storing 55 vehicles simultaneously, in connection with the Applicant's proposed child day-care facility designed to accommodate 55 children, on property located at 10 Rye Ridge Plaza Suite 26, in a C 1-P zoning district on the West side of South Ridge Street, at the intersection of Bowman Avenue and South Ridge Street. Said premises being known and designated on the tax map of the Village of Rye Brook as Parcel ID# 141.27-1-7; and WHEREAS, the original variance approval expiret/on August 5, 2019 pursuant to Village Code § 250-13.11; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Board is in receipt of a letter from Caryn O'Connor, Vice President of Imagine Early Learning Centers, dated July 15, 2019 requesting an extension of the variances; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Board has the authority pursuant to Village Code § 250- 13.1­1 to grant an extension of the variance approval for an additional six (6) months if the applicant demonstrates that there is a good cause for an extension; and WHEREAS, the Applicant obtained the related Planning Board approvals for this matter in March 2019, since that time the landlord (WIN properties) has been performing work to obtain the required permits from the Village, however the work has not been properly completed and the required permits have not yet been issued by the Village. 1313/08/6829250 7125119 -1- NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Village of Rye Brook Zoning Board hereby grants a six (6) month extension of the variances referenced herein for property located at 10 Rye Ridge Plaza Suite 26 to expire on February 6, 2020 unless a building permit is issued prior to February 6, 2020. Dated: August 6, 2019 Mr. Don Moscato, Chairman Chairman Moscato called the roll: Steven Berger Voting: Aye Glen Brettschneider Voting: Aye Don Moscato Voting: Aye Jamie Schutzer Voting: Aye Joel,,$imon Voting: Aye 5 Ayes Nays _Abstain _ Excused Recused 1 3 1 3/08/6 82 925v1 7125119 -2- Village of Rye Brook o A ends Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting Tuesday, August 6, 2019 at 8:00 PM Village Hall, 938 King Street 1. ITEMS: 1.1. #19-005 (adjourned from 6/4/2019) 1100 King Associates LLC 1100 King Street Replace three existing office park signs with new larger signs. Approvals; Adjournment Aye; Nay; 1.2. #19-006 Roberto Cuesta Jr. & Julie Averay 11 Ridge Boulevard Remove existing porch and replace the existing deck. Mail Affidavit Sign Affidavit Approvals; Adjournment Aye; Nay; 1.3. #18-026 Win Ridge Realty LLC/Caryn O'Connor, Imagine Learning Center S'r'l" 10 Rye Ridge Plaza Suite 26 Z l �OLzo Operate a child day-care facility. Request extension of approval of Zoning variance, Village Code § 250-13.H. Approvals; Adjournment Aye; S Nay; 2. SUMMARY APPROVALS: 2.1. Approval of June 4, 2019 Zoning Board Summary Approvals; Adjournment DM ✓ MI Aye; SB ✓ SF Nay; GB ✓ PP JDS K&B / JS DH III July 15, 2019 By Email and Overnight Mail JUL 16 2019 Chairman Don Moscato and members of the Zoning Board of Appeals VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK ' BUILDING DEPARTMENT Village of Rye Brook 938 King St Rye Brook, New York 10573 Re: Imagine Early Learning Centers,LLC Variance Extension Request Premises:10 Rye Ridge Plaza, Suite 26 i 7 Dear Chairman Moscato and Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals: This letter is respectfully requested on behalf of Imagine Early Learning Centers, LLC, in connection with the above-referenced application relating to the property at 10 Rye Ridge Plaza, Suite 26 in the Village of Rye Brook, New York. The Board granted variances in the matter on February 2nd, 2019 which we understand will be expiring in August. Please note that Imagine obtained the related Planning Board approvals for this matter in March of 2019. Since that time, we are aware that WIN properties, the landlord, is still in the process of working to obtain their required permits from the town. Therefore, we are requesting a six (6) month extension of the variances previously granted and further request that this matter be placed on the next available agenda for consideration. Thank you in advance for your consideration. Be i Caryn O'Connor Vice President Imagine Early Learning Centers caryn(c-Dimagineelc.com (646) 734-3859 Imagine Early Learning Centers 250 Bedford Park Blvd.West p 718.960.8079/1114 Bronx, NY 10468 f 718.960.6916 www.imagineelc.com (� July 15, 2019 JUL 1 5 2019 By Email and Overnight Mail Chairman Don Moscato VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK 'f-- and members of the Zoning Board of Appeals L. aL�I 'ING DE!PARTPAENT ' Village of Rye Brook .m ` '"'^- 938 King St j Rye Brook, New York 10573 Re: Imagine Early Learning Centers,LLC �.� Variance Extension Request Premises:10 Rye Ridge Plaza, Suite 26 7 Dear Chairman Moscato and Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals: This letter is respectfully requested on behalf of Imagine Early Learning Centers, LLC, in connection with the above-referenced application relating to the property at 10 Rye Ridge Plaza, Suite 26 in the Village of Rye Brook, New York. The Board granted variances in the matter on February 2nd, 2019 which we understand will be expiring in August. Please note that Imagine obtained the related Planning Board approvals for this matter in March of 2019. Since that time, we are aware that WIN properties, the landlord, is still in the process of working to obtain their required permits from the town. Therefore, we are requesting a six (6) month extension of the variances previously granted and further request that this matter be placed on the next available agenda for consideration. Thank you in advance for your consideration. B epe, r Caryn O'Connor Vice President Imagine Early Learning Centers caryn(@.imagineelc.com (646) 734-3859 Imagine Early Learning Centers 250 Bedford Park Blvd.West p 718.960.8079/1114 Bronx, NY 10468 f 718.960.6916 www.imagineelc.corn • f Village of Rye Brook A-2end_ 'y Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting cc Tuesday, February 5, 2019 at 8:00 PM Village Hall, 938 King Street 1. ITEMS: 1.1. #18-026 (adjourned from 1/2/2019 by applicant) Win Ridge Realty LLC/Caryn O'Connor, Imagine Learning Center 10 Rye Ridge Plaza Suite 26 Operate a child day-care facility. Mail Affidavit V Sign Affidavit Approvals; Adjoumment Fn-e Aye; S /��' `�_ l�7 S Nay; r,q l e� 2. SUMMARY APPROVALS: 2.1. Approval of November 6, 2018 Zoning Board Summary(adjourned from 12/4/2018) Approvals; Adjournment Aye; Nay; 2.2. Approval of January 2, 2019 Zoning Board Summary Approvals; Adjournment Aye; Nay; DM / MI I SB •/ SF V GB J PP JDS K&B f JS ✓ DH BP, Village of Rye Brook .� A enda Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting JJ t��G�tui n`y Wednesday, January 2, 2019 at 8:00 PM Village Hall, 938 King Street 1. ITEMS: 1.1. #18-022 (adjourned from 12/4/2018) Michael Rivera& Samantha Furci 27 Hillcrest Avenue Construct a new front portico with steps to grade,new front walk and new side walk. Mail Affidavit Sign Affidavit Approvals; Adjournment Aye; Nay; 1.2. #18-026 Win Ridge Realty LLC/Caryn O'Connor, Imagine Learning Center 10 Rye Ridge Plaza Suite 26 Operate a child day-care facility. Mail Affidavit V Sign Affidavit Approvals; Adjournment Z S I l Aye; Nay; 2. SUMMARY APPROVALS: 2.1. Approval of December 4, 2018 Zoning Board Summary Approvals; Adjournment Aye; Nay; DM ✓ MI SB SF GB PP JDS K&B JS DH L­ � Lsu V9 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK FEB - 5 2019 UO ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS VILLgGE CL�RF('5 �Fc��� RESOLUTION WHEREAS, an application has been made to the Rye Brook Zoning Board of Appeals by Caryn O'Connor, on behalf of Imagine Learning Center (the "Applicant") for (1) a yard play area variance of 7,736 square feet where the required amount of yard play area for the proposed child day care center is 11,000 square feet pursuant to Village Code §250- 6.H.(3)(c), (2) relief from § 40-6.1­1(3)(e) of the Village Code which provides that day care centers with more than 15 children must operate in buildings with fireproof or semi- fireproof construction as defined by the Building Code of the Village of Rye Brook; and (3) relief from § 250-6.H.(3)(0 of the Village Code which requires day care centers to have an off-street drop-off/pick up area capable of storing 55 vehicles simultaneously, in connection with the Applicant's proposed child day-care facility designed to accommodate 55 children, on property located at 10 Rye Ridge Plaza Suite 26, in a Cl-P zoning district on the West side of South Ridge Street, at the intersection of Bowman Avenue and South Ridge Street. Said premises being known and designated on the tax map of the Village of Rye Brook as Parcel ID# 141.27-1-7; and WHEREAS, a duly advertised public hearing on the application was held on February 4,2019, at which time all those wishing to be heard on the application were given such opportunity; and WHEREAS, the Board closed the public hearing on February 2, 2019; and WHEREAS, the proposed action is a Type II Action pursuant to the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act, and accordingly, no further environmental review is required; and WHEREAS, the Board, from the application, after viewing the premises and neighborhood concerned, and upon considering each of the factors set forth at Section 250- 13(G)(2)(b)[2][a]-[e] of the Rye Brook Code, finds with respect to the requested yard play area variance of 7,736 square feet where the required amount of yard play area for the proposed child day care center is 11,000 square feet that: 1313/08/654301vl 215119 1) The variance [WILL/ ILL create an adverse impact to the character of the neighbor ood; 2) The benefit the Applicant seeks [CA( / CANN e achieved through another method, feasible for the Applicant to pursue, that does not require the variance; 3) The varianc [TS IS NOT] substantial; 4) The variance [WILL WILL NO reate any adverse impacts to the physical or environmental conditions of the neighborhood; and 5) The need for the varianc [IS/ IS NOT] self-created. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that said application for a yard play area variance of 7,736 square feet where the required amount of yard play area for the proposed child day care center is 11,000 square feet pursuant to Village Code § 250- 6.H.(3)(c), is her y [GRANTED DENIED], subject to the following conditions: 2. 1a tom} WA.l `(�x k S,'rr� c m r - }4 Chairman Moscato called the roll: Steven Berger Voting: �Ye Nay Abstain Excused Glen Brettschneider Voting: :: Aye y Abstain Excused Don Moscato Voting: -ye i/ Nay Abstain Excused Jamie Schutzer Voting: ✓ ye Nay Abstain Excused Joel Simon Voting: y rye Nay Abstain Excused AND WHEREAS, the Board, from the application, after viewing the premises and neighborhood concerned, and upon considering each of the factors set forth at Section 250- 13(G)(2)(b)[2][a]-[e] of the Rye Brook Code, finds with respect to the request for relief from § 250-6.H(3)(e) of the Village Code, which provides that day care centers with more than 15 children must operate in buildings with fireproof or semi-fireproof construction, that: 1) The variance [WILL/ WILL NN create an adverse impact to the character of the neighborhood; 1313/08/654301 v1 215119 2) The benefit the Applicant seeks [CAN/ be achieved through another method, feasible for the Applicant to pur sue, that does not require the variance; 3) The varianc PS NOT] substantial• 4) The variance [WILL/ ILL NO reate any adverse impacts to the physical or environmental conditions of the neighborhood; and 5) The need for the variance [IS IS NOT) self-created. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that said application for relief from § 250-6.H(3)(e) of the Village Code which provides that day care centers with more than 15 children must operate in buildings with fireproof or semi-fireproof construction aQefined by the Building Code of the Village of Rye Brook, is hereby �TDDENIED], subject to the following conditions: 2. '\1� �c J Chairman Moscato called the roll: Steven Berger Voting: v Aye Nay Abstain Excused Glen Brettschneider Voting: ✓ e Nay Abstain Excused Don Moscato Voting: Skye Nay Abstain Excused Jamie Schutzer Voting: ,lr,�ry e Nay Abstain Excused Joel Simon Voting: Aye Nay Abstain Excused AND WHEREAS, the Board, from the application, after viewing the premises and neighborhood concerned, and upon considering each of the factors set forth at Section 250- 13(G) 2)(b)[2)[a]-[e] of the Rye Brook Code, finds with respect to the request for relief from 5 2 -6.H(3)(f) of the Village Code, which requires day care centers to have an off-street drop-off/pick up area capable of storing 55 vehicles simultaneously, that: 1313/08/654301v1 215119 1) The variance [WILL/ WILL NO create an adverse impact to the character of the neighborhood; 2) The benefit the applicant seeks [CANrCANNOT] e achieved through another method, feasible for the Applicant to pursue, that does not require the variance; 3) The variance IS NOT] substantial; 4) The variance [WILL/WILL�onasof NOreate any adverse impacts to the physical or environmental con the neighborhood; and 5) The need for the varian CRNOT] self-created. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that said application for relief from 5 250-6.H.(3)(0 of the Village Code which requires to have a off-street drop-off/pick up area capable of storing 55 vehicles simultaneously, is hereb [GRANTED/ ENIED], subject to the following conditions: 1. 2. Chairman Moscato called the roll: Steven Berger Voting: ✓ ye Nay Abstain Excused Glen Brettschneider Voting: +� ye Nay Abstain Excused Don Moscato Voting: iAye Nay abstain Excused Jamie Schumer Voting: A e Nay Abstain Excused Joel Simon Voting: Aye Nay abstain Excused BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that no permit or certificate of occupancy shall be issued until the Applicant has paid in full all application and consultant fees incurred by the Village in connection with the review of this application. Dated: February 5, 2019 , 4P Mr. Don Moscato, Chairman 13131081654301vl 215119 �yE 6R(��w ,^ LC 190 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK MAYOR 938 King Street, Rye Brook, N.Y. 10573 ADMINISTRATOR Paul S. Rosenberg (914) 939-0668 Fax (914) 939-5801 Christopher J. Bradbury www.ryebrook.orq TRUSTEES BUILDING & FIRE Susan R. Epstein INSPECTOR David M. Heiser Michael J. Izzo Jason A. Klein Jeffrey B. Rednick NOTICE OF HEARING ON APPLICATION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the undersigned has filed an application to appear before the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Rye Brook. Application # 18-026 Owner: Win Ridge Realty LLC 24 Rye Ridge Plaza Rye Brook,New York 10170 Applicant: Caryn O'Connor,Imagine Learning Center 250 Bedford Park Boulevard West Bronx,New York 10468 Applicant Proposes to: Operate a Child Day-Care Facility. At the premises known as 10 Rye Ridge Plaza Suite 26 in the Village of Rye Brook, New York, situated on the West side of South Ridge Street, at the intersection of Bowman Avenue and South Ridge Street, designated and shown on the most current tax map as Parcel ID# 141.27-1-7,the applicant does hereby request a variance(s)from the following applicable section(s)of the Zoning Ordinance: 4250-6.11.0)(c); The amount of required yard play area for this child day care center is 11,000 square feet. The applicant is proposing to provide 3,264 square feet of yard play area. Therefore a yard play area variance of 7,736 square feet is requested. 4250-6.11.0)(e): The center shall not have more than 15 children in any case, except if the building is of fireproof or semi-fireproof construction as defined by the Building Code of the Village of Rye Brook. The applicant is proposing to have 55 children in the existing shopping center building which is not of fireproof or semi-fireproof construction as defined by the Building Code of the Village of Rye Brook. Therefore relief from this section of the code is requested. _4250-6.11.0)(fl; The center shall have an off-street drop-off/pickup area capable of storing 55 vehicles simultaneously delivering and/or collecting children from this facility. The applicant is providing no dedicated off-street drop-off/pickup area. Therefore relief from this section of the code is requested. A Public Hearing on said application will be held before the Village Zoning Board of Appeals on Wednesday, January 2,2019,at 8 o'clock p.m.at the Village of Rye Brook Offices located at 938 King Street,Rye Brook,NY 10573. Plans and other materials associated with the proposed application may be reviewed and downloaded via the Meetings/Agendas link from the Rye Brook website home ge, and are available for review at the Building Department. Dated: \-"-�t-\ Christopher J. Bradbury,Villa lerk BUILDI TMENT (� (� VILL OF R OOK D E V `r' E KING STREfuZ ; RY ` OOK,NY 10 3 DEC - 5 2018 Ej PHONE (914) 9 FAX 14) 939-5801 org VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK BUILDING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Application Fee: $350.00 ( 46aid • Escrow Fee: $1,000.00 ( Vfpaid Date: 1r116 . o!e) �xxxxxxxxxxxXXxxxxxxxxXxxxxxxxxxXxxXxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxXxxxxxxXxxxxXXxxXXxXxxxxXx Subject Property. 10 Rye Ridge Plaza, Suite 26 ParcelID#: 141.27-1-7 Zone: Cl-P Property Owner: Win Properties, Inc. Address: 10 Rye Ridge Plaza, Suite 200, Rye Brook, NY Phone#: (914) 468-7300 CellM - email: jkallman@winprop.com Applicant: Imagine Learning Centers (Caryn O'Connor) Address: 250 Bedford Park Blvd.West,Bronx,NY 10468 Phone#: (646) 734-3859 Cell - email: caryn@imagineelc.com Attorney/Agent: Silverberg Zalantis, LLP(Steve Silverberg)Address: 120 White Plains Road, Tarrytown, NY Phone#: (914) 682-0707 CellM email: silverberg@szlawfirm.net n The applicant named herein does hereby request an appeal from the decision made by the Building Inspector on an application dated November 16th , 20 18 , whereby the Building Inspector did: Grant: ( )/Deny: (X) the applicant permit for the re-occupancy of existing vacant space, Suite 26, within 10 Rye Ridge Plaza by Imagine Early Learning Centers for Child Day Care. 1. Type of Appeal: (X)Variance to the Zoning Ordinance ( X )Interpretation of the Zoning Ordinance ( ) Certification for Continuation of a Nonconforming Use ( ) Permit for Occupancy ( ) Permit for Use 2. This application relates to: ( )Use (X)Area ( )Height ( )Setback ( )Other: In connection with: ( )A Proposed Building ( )An Existing Building 3. Previous Appeal(s); ( )Have (X)Have Not been made with respect to this particular decision of the Building Inspector, and (X)Have( )Have Not been made with respect to any other previous decision(s) made by the Building Inspector regarding the subject property. List All Previous Zoning Appeals Either Granted or Denied Concerning the Subiect Property a. A requested variance was (X)Granted/( )Denied on application# dated, June 7 2016 for, Allowing parking up to 19 feet into the 35 foot S.R.O.D Buffer along Bowman Avenue b. A requested variance was ())Granted/( )Denied on application# dated, ,tune 7, 2016 for, A zero sidevard setback for unenclosed off-street parking c. A requested variance was ( )Granted/( )Denied on application# dated, for, 1 (Use additional sheets if necessary) 9/17/18 4. tIRCi"Qllull- If work constitutes an alteration or extension to an existing building, describe briefly: Interior space will be altered to accommodate the proposed Child Day Care use. No exterior changes to the building are proposed. 5. Construction Cost: What is the estimated cost of the proposed work? $ $17 5 , 0 0 0 6. Reasons for Appeal: A. An Area Variance to the Zoning Ordinance is requested because strict application of the ordinance would create the following hardship: There is no other feasible method to provide outdoor space as noted in the code as the existing on-site suitable outdoor space is limited and there is no curbside pick-up or drop-off available for the proposed 55 children. B. An Interpretation of the Zonine Ordinance is requested because: An interpretation of Section 250-6.H.(3)(c)is being requested. While this Section of the Code indicates that the size of the outdoor Play area is defined by the number of children it is unclear whether the Code is referring to the capacity of the Child Care facility, or the number of children who would or could occupy or use the out door play area at any one time/class and/or shift. In the event that 0 Zoning Board of Appeals would find that the Building Inspector has correctly interpreted the Code we would respectfully request that the Board grant relief from said conditions. We seek and interpretation of Building Inspector's application of section 250-6 (H) 2 (e) of the code as set forth in the accompanying correspondence. C. A Use Variance to the Zoning Ordinance is requested because strict application of the ordinance would create the following hardship: N/A 2 (Use additional sheets if necessary) 9/17/18 i. Requestea i�onin2 Appeals: I.SectionofRyeBrookCode: §250-6 .H. (3) (c) : "Minimum Child Day-Care Play Area" Zoning Requirement: 11, 000 square feet Proposed Work: 3 ,400 square feet Requested Variance: 7, 600 square feet (70%) II. Section of Rye Brook Code: § 250-6 .H. (3) (e) "Maximum Number of Children" Zoning Requirement: 15 Children Proposed Work: 55 Children Requested Variance: 40 Children (7 3%) III. Section of Rye Brook Code: § 250-6 .H. (3) (f) : "Off-Street Drop-off/Pickup Area" Zoning Requirement: Drop-off/Pickup area for 15 vehicles . Proposed Work: Drop-off/Pickup area for 0 vehicles . Application proposes to utilize the adjacent existing parking facility. Requested Variance: Drop-off/Pickup Area for 15 vehicles (1000s) . TV. Section of Rye Brook Code: § N/A Zoning Requirement: Proposed Work: Requested Variance: V. Section of Rye Brook Code: § N/A Zoning Requirement: Proposed Work: Requested Variance: 3 (Use additional sheets if necessary) 9/17/18 S.. 'item checklist of information from instruction sheet: (X) Letter of Disapproval (X) Properly Completed & Signed Original Zoning Variance Application (X) Two (2) Sets of Sealed Plans (X) Non-refundable Application Fee of$350.00 (X) Escrow Account Fee of$1,000.00 ( ) Provisions of any deeds, covenants, easements or restrictions affecting the kind of improvements allowed or prohibited upon the premises. O Notarized Mailer& Sign Affidavits, Area Map & Public Notification List (Please note that the notarized affidavits must be received by the Building Depai'lntent by no later than the Thursday prior to the scheduled zoning hearing) This application must include the notarized signature(s) of the applicant of record as well that of the legal owner(s) of the subject property in the spaces provided below. Any application not properly signed shall be deemed null and void and will be returned to the applicant. STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER ) as: Caryn GVoaer— O e p n n o r being duly sworn, deposes and states that he/she is the applicant above named, (print name of individual signing as the applicant) and further States that (s)he is the legal owner of the property to which this application pertains, or that (s)he is the potential tenant for the legal owner and is duly authorized to make and file this application. (indicate architect,contractor,agent,attorney,etc.) That all statements contained herein are true to the best of his/her knowledge and belief, and that any work performed or use conducted at the above captioned property will be in conformance with the determination of, and any conditions set by the Rye Brook Zoning Board of Appeals, with the details as set forth and contained in this application and in any accompanying approved plans and specifications, as well as in accordance with the New York State Uniform Fire Prevention & Building Code, the Code of the Village of Rye Brook and all other applicable laws, ordinances and regulations. Sworn to before me this Sworn to before me this J day of �t� , 20 \ day of Deccm , 20_T_ Notary u I' No y Pu lic SignaVre f frtrty'C4me er M Signature of Applicant Jonathan Kallman Caryn O' Connor Print Name of Property 9w+ter-Gffiee— Print Name of Applicant KF!1Y ^ ` ? Lisa P.Kolba Notary F'!%h'' ".1 York NOTARY PUBLIC-',t,tate of New York N' ( No,of k04916831 Qi,01;{ir:r1 1 Y Qualified in'Westchester rn_ty^ Colnrriissior. �xp,, c; u .• z Z Term Expilas Dec.28. L 4 9/17/18 9018\16194\Admin\Anolir tinny\7.nA lLr: l9-OS-701 a.ixlt .Dea o si,elao sw,ieai pwrOOS ce 0 1 O O 1 M O 1 O 1 O 1 1 # Z # w i �! w ! I � 3 m 1 a O V Ln z IT1 Y rn CLn O m Q w O r" in $ N V N q L Ln �U O _^ U a 3 �•• t � rU O O O y O z a " .m FC z o N ru ;o U O z �z N O Y zz� N ca U z QON cc W oa�� b W W II aM z tecc a- a M z �Oo E+z v N Ise En O j z morn b O 14 O ZU0 wz°o c o 0 q�A4 Oa0 d li UN� b 4 00 w g o ro Hm>+ I, Z oo >rn a ° ;0, y �4JN L4 v°±JJ L�LFL � L�V4 wv.L 1 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK MAYOR 938 King Street, Rye Brook, N.Y. 10573 ADMINISTRATOR Paul S. Rosenberg (914)939-0668 Fax(914)939-5801 Christopher J. Bradbury www.rvebrook.oro TRUSTEES BUILDING&FIRE Susan R. Epstein INSPECTOR David M. Heiser Michael J. Izzo Jason A. Klein Jeffrey B. Rednick NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL Application * 18-026 November 16, 2018 Owner: Win Ridge Realty LLC 24 Rye Ridge Plaza Rye Brook. New York 10573 Applicant: Caryn O'Connor, Imagine Learning Center 250 Bedford Park Boulevard West Bronx. New York 10468 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that your application for building permit dated, October 26. 2018, for the premises located at 10 Rye Ridge Plaza, Parcel ID## 141.27-1-7, has been disapproved because of non-compliance with the following section(s)of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook: 4250-6.H.(3)(c); The amount of required yard play area for this child day care center is 11,000 square feet. The applicant is proposing to provide 3.264 square feet of yard play area. 4250-6.H.(3)(e); The center shall not have more than 15 children in any case,except if the building is of fireproof or semi-fireproof construction as defined by the Building Code of the Village of Rye Brook.The applicant is proposing to have 55 children in the existing shopping center building which is not of fireproof or semi-fireproof construction as defined by the Building Code of the Village of Rye Brook. 4250-6.H.(3)(f); The center shall have an off-street drop-off/pickup area capable of storing 55 vehicles simultaneously delivering and/or collecting children from this facility. The applicant is providing no dedicated off-street drop-off/pickup area. Please revise your plans to fully comply with the applicable section(s) of Village Code, or an appeal to this decision may be brought before the Village Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA) in accordance with §250-13 and §250-40 of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook. Applications to appear before the ZBA are available at the Building Department or online at www.ryebrook.org. Sin e 7 p� Mic ael J Izz Buil Fire Inspector mizzoaryebrook.org AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING LEGAL NOTICE I hereby swear that the following notice was given by personal service, first class mail to the property owners listed below, at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing date also a 3' x 4' sign of Public Notice was erected two weeks prior hearing date: NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that A Public Hearing on said application will be held before the Village Zoning Board of Appeals on Tuesday, February 5, 2019, at 8 o'clock p.m. at the Village of Rye Brook Offices located at 938 King Street, Rye Brook, NY 10573. Plans and other materials associated with the proposed application may be reviewed and downloaded via the Meetings/Agendas link from the Rye Brook website homepage, and are available for review at the Building Department. Ceja,Claudio The Pointe Development Group Yumart Felix O 44 Roanoke Ave 10 The Pointe 49 Roanoke Ave PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 Magri John& Lanza,Anthony The Pointe Development Group Nadine 46 Roanoke Ave 7 The Pointe 39 Westview Ave PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 The Pointe Development Group Win Ridge Shopping Ctr De-LLC Lucero Saul 2 The Pointe S. Ridge St 38 Roanoke Ave PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 The Pointe Development Group The Pointe Development Group Current Occupant 6 The Pointe 5 The Pointe PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 Morgese Diane The Pointe Development Group Win Plaza-De LLC 35 Westview Ave Bowman Ave Bowman Ave PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 Marini,Enrico The Pointe Development Group The Pointe Development Group 42 Roanoke Ave 9 The Pointe 1 The Pointe PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 Westchester County Westchester County Port Chester-Rye Ufs Distist#4 Bowman Bowman 113 Bowman Ave PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 Win Plaza-De LLC Manfredonia,George Suriano Christopher J Roanoke Ave 37 Westview Ave 40 Roanoke Ave PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 Urban,Julia Bowman III Llc The Pointe Development Group 47 Roanoke Ave 111 Bowman Ave 4 The Pointe PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 The Pointe Development Group Licare,Victoria Guglielmo,Giuseppe 3 The Pointe 36 Roanoke Ave 32 Westview Ave PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 (Applicant's Representative Signature) }� JtML �-44t yA S(,l✓I�[Gk( ( n I � o (f (Applicant Representative Namet ompany) Sworn before me at ls,�i `` day of �4\g A_,_�A _. (Notary P blic) N7TARY PUBIiC-STATE OF NEW YOR1C FEB - 1 2019 No. O1 R06134291 Encl.: Map Cyaltfiod In Putnam County- Photo of Sign �Y C4itt,nls;.on Expires SeP•\Z01�\186'7;ta3.in\affidavit of mailing zoning board 01-19-2019.docx f MIS ■ wonPunue NOTICE . , B IPUBU!C HERRIN Gi min1wG1 V13% R lkokin ,t RPP LI C TICLIR W111 BE HELD BY I K[ RYIE BROG�4 V1lil ��r 1i ON FE.SPURM 5 2019 al 9-lag P.M. AT THE BYE B't BU1K %RUAGE B ul, 938 KING ST BEET ADDITIONAL INTOWRTION IS AVAIVARLE AT THIE RYE BBGBIK#BL ILGING UEPARTMEM . � i 12/19/2018 Westchester County GIS::Tax Parcel Maps Tax Parcel Maps Address: Bowman Ave Print Key: 141.27-1-7 SBL: 14102700010070000000 Y •- } t I 7 20 , 4 ��e, y,y�s;�t•� �Y � 1 W F' -sift, Vt Id Op P Disclaimer: This tax parcel map is provided as a public service to Westchester County residents for general information and planning purposes only, and should not be relied upon as a sole informational source. The County of Westchester hereby disclaims any liability from the use of this GIS mapping system by any person or entity.Tax parcel boundaries represent approximate property line location and should Q be interpreted as or used in lieu of a survey or property boundary description. Property descriptions must be obtained from surveys or deeds. For more information please contact the assessor's office of the municipality. https://giswww.westchestergov.com/taxmaps/layout.aspx?r--RYK213896 1/1 SJSILVERBERG ZALANTISur Law Offices 120 White Plains Road,Ste 305 Tarrytown,New York 10591 Tel. (914)682-0707 Fax.(914)682-0708 www.szlawfirm.net December 5, 2018 BY HAND D IE � �C 2 J ��J�7 Zoning Board of Appeals Village of Rye Brook DEC - 5 2018 938 King Street Rye Brook,NY 10573 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK BUILDING DEPARTMENT Re: Application of Imagine Early Learning Centers Dear Chair and Members of the Board: This office represents the applicant Imagine Early Learning Centers ("Imagine") which is seeking variances and a review of the determination of the Building Inspector. Submitted herewith are the following: a. Completed Zoning Appeals Application b.ZC-1 Site Plan c. ZC-2 Site Plan Enlargement d. Memorandum from 1MC e. Letter from Neil Carnow Architect f. Letter from Fredrick Taylor Architects, P.C. g. Email from Village Administrator h.Survey L Denial Letter j. Filing and escrow fees h. Digital Copy(DISC) The applicant seeks to establish a child care facility that would accommodate 55 children. Of the 55 children (9) are infants and (12) are toddlers 18 months to 3 years of age, and (34) preschoolers ages 3 years to 5 years of age. As noted in the memorandum from JMC Engineering while the proposal does not meet the letter of the zoning code for outdoor space and curbside drop off,the nature of the operation is such that(a)there will be adequate outdoor space for the children due to their ages, some of whom will not use the space, and the fact that they will never all be Zoning Board of Appeals Village of Rye Brook December 5, 2018 Page 2 using the space at the same time and (b) curbside drop off is not applicable. Therefore, as the proposed variances will have zero impact on the neighborhood or nearby environment, the requested variances should be granted. In addition, we are seeking interpretations of both the Building Inspector's calculations regarding the spaces required and for the number of children who will be cared for and the Building Inspector's application of a 1950 building code which is no longer applicable for several reasons. VARIANCES: New York State's Village Law § 7-712-b (3) provides the standards for area variances: In making its determination,a Village zoning board of appeals shall take into consideration the benefit to the applicant if the variance is granted,as weighed against the detriment to the health, safety and welfare of the neighborhood or community by such grant. In making such determination the board shall also consider: (1) whether an undesirable change will be produced in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties will be created by the granting of the area variance; As noted in the JMC memo, the open space is within the existing shopping center and will not adversely impact any adjoining properties. The failure to provide curb side pickup and drop off will actually be beneficial, as it will permit the flow of traffic within the parking lot to flow unimpeded and due to the times of day for drop off and pick up there will be plenty of parking for parents,who will stay for short periods while picking up and dropping off their young children. We believe after hearing the application your board will agree that, due to the nature of the population and the intended use, there will be adequate outdoor play space. However, as noted in the email from Chris Bradbury, the Village has offered to provide a license to utilize space at the Village Park, should your board determine that the onsite space being provided is not adequate. (2) whether the benefit sought by the applicant can be achieved by some method,feasible for the applicant to pursue, other than an area variance; There is no other feasible method as the outdoor space available on site is limited and there is no curbside pickup or drop off available. (3) whether the requested area variance is substantial; While the variances requested could be considered substantial that is not a basis for denying the request. Zoning Board of Appeals Village of Rye Brook December 5, 2018 Page 3 The Appellate Division, Second Department (the appellate Court from this jurisdiction) has conclusively established that even though: (i) petitioner's difficulty was self-created; and (ii) the requested variance was "arguably substantial," the denial of the area variance was arbitrary and capricious because there was "no evidence that granting the variance would have an undesirable effect on the character of the neighborhood, adversely impact on physical or environmental conditions, or otherwise result in a `detriment to the health, safety and welfare of the neighborhood or community."I A subsequent Second Department decision reaffirmed this principal in upholding the determination by the lower court that the zoning board's determination to deny the variances did not have a rational basis in the record, and that the determination was therefore, arbitrary and capricious.2 In rendering this decision,the Second Department held that"evidence did not support the ZBA's determination that the granting of the variances would have the effect of altering the character of the neighborhood."3 (4) whether the proposed variance will have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district; and As already noted above, the proposed variances will not have any significant effect on the physical or environmental conditions of the neighborhood. (5) whether the alleged difficulty was self-created; which consideration shall be relevant to the decision of the board of appeals, but shall not necessarily preclude the granting of the area variance. Here, while the desire to locate the facility at this location is self-created the other factors in the balancing test more than outweigh this factor. Further, as the statute states, self-created hardship, standing alone is not sufficient to form the basis for denial of a variance. As also noted in Easy Home Program v. Trotta, cited above, even when combined with a substantial variance, self-created hardship is not a basis for denying a variance where, as here, there will be no adverse impact on surrounding properties or material change in the character of the neighborhood resulting from the variances. INTERPRETATION: The size of the outdoor space required. As pointed out in detail in the JMC memo section §250-6.H.(3)(c)of the code dealing with the amount of required outdoor space is unclear as to how that requirement is calculated. If all the children, even the infants, included in the Day Care used the outdoor space at the same time, then the requested variance would be required. However, as Easy Home Program v. Trotta,276 A.D.2d 553,714 N.Y.S.2d 509(2d Dep't 2000). 2 Campbell v. Town of Mount Pleasant Zoning Board of Appeals,84 A.D.3d 1230,923 N.Y.S.2d 699(2d Dep't 2011). 31d at 1231-1232. Zoning,Board of Appeals Village of Rye Brook December 5, 2018 Page 4 the JMC memo points out, the lack of clarity in the code leaves this section open to the interpretation that the space only be of a size necessary to accommodate the number of children using it at one time. Similar to fire code requirements, there should be a maximum occupancy, which is the intent of the applicant, Moreover, as the code section is not clear it should be interpreted in favor of the least restrictive interpretation and a determination made that no variance is required for this space. Likewise the Building Inspector's application of section 250-6 (H) 2 (e) of the code overlooks the fact that it is based upon the 1950 Village Code provision which, as pointed out in the letters of both Fredrick Taylor and Neil Carnow, both of whom are architects,that adhering to the letter of this code disregards the fact that the terminology used in the 1950 code is no longer used in building codes and that the 1950 code made no provision for additional fireproofing such as the sprinklers in the building. In addition, the provisions of this section, which was adopted in 1997, ignores the fact that the Village(Chapter 91 of the Village Code), in 2016,adopted the New York State Building and Fire Prevention Code, which includes the provisions cited in the two architects' letters making the space "fireproof' to a greater extent than contemplated in the 1950 code. With respect to the interpretations of both of these provisions, there is at least some ambiguity.Under New York law,zoning codes must be"strictly construed against the municipality which has enacted and seeks to enforce them" and "in favor of the property owner."4 It should be noted that in interpreting a legislative act it is necessary to apply the clear language of the statute and if there is any lack of clarity, as zoning laws are in derogation of common law property rights, any benefit of the doubt is to favor the property owner: Zoning laws must be given a strict construction since they are in derogation of common-law rights (Matter of 440 E. 102nd St. Corp. v. Murdock, 285 N.Y. 298, 304, 34 N.E.2d 329). While specific application of a term of the zoning ordinance to a particular property is generally governed by the board's interpretation (Matter ofFrishman v. Schmidt, 61 N.Y.2d 823,825,473 N.Y.S.2d 957,462 N.E.2d 134), its interpretation is "not entitled to unquestioning judicial deference, since the ultimate responsibility of interpreting the law is with the court" (Matter of Exxon Corp. v. Board of Stds. &Appeals of City of N.Y., 128 A.D.2d 289, 296, 515 N.Y.S.2d 768, lv. denied 70 N.Y.2d 614, 524 N.Y.S.2d 676, 519 N.E.2d 622). (emphasis added) 5 Allen v.Adami,39 N.Y.2d 275,347 N.E.2d 890,383 N.Y.S.2d 565,567(1976). 5 Curtis Case, Inc. v. Shaw, 141 A.D.2d 640, 642, 529 N.Y.S.2d 377, 378 (1988) Zoning Board of Appeals Village of Rye Brook December 5, 2018 Page 5 Thank you for your consideration. Very truly yours, SILVERBERG ZALANTIS LLP Steven M. Silverb sms:no enc. neil carnow a.; :: archjteCt 52 blair heights carmel new York 10512 845-704-1622 December 3,2018 D LDEC - 5 2018 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK BUILDING DEPARTf/IENT Mr. Don Moscato, Chairman Village of Rye Brook Zoning Board of Appeals 938 King Street Rye Brook, New York 10573 Re: Imagine Early Child Care Center—Proposed 10 Rye Brook Plaza-Suite 26 Bowman Ave Village of Rye Brook,New York 10573 Dear Chairman Moscato: INTRODUCTION The above referenced project is subject to language within the Zoning Ordinance of Rye Brook, which limits the number of children allowed in a day care center to 15 if the building is not constructed as either Fireproof or Semi Fireproof construction, requirements of the 1950 Town of Rye Building Code. To respond to that criteria, I have reviewed the language in the Zoning Ordinance, reviewed the tenant plans prepared by Busing Associates/Architects/LLP dated 6-26-18,reviewed multiple New York State Building Codes from 1972 to present and discussed this issue with several persons in the New York State Codes Division without specificity as to the municipality. Both Fireproof and Semi Fireproof descriptions in the 1950 Town of Rye Code require that the underlying structural elements must be of non- combustible materials,which is the case with the subject building. The terms Fireproof and Semi Fireproof are no longer used in the building codes of New York State and haven't been since at least 1972. The terms are used to represent construction providing fire rated covering for structural elements of the building that would be consistent in concept with Type I construction in recent and current building codes. 1 ANALYSIS As part of this analysis, it would be appropriate to determine whether the proposed project would be compliant with current building code requirements in a construction classification other than Fireproof or Semi Fireproof(similar to Type 1) Building Construction Classification: Type 2B non-combustible* Occupancy Classification: 14 Day Care Center Project Area: 4464sf Occupancy Load: 4464sf/35 = 128 persons** *The non-combustible designation means that the structural elements do not support combustion and do not have any additional material provided to enclose them to produce a specific fire rating. **To determine what the allowable occupancy load would be under today's building you would use Table 1004.1.2 of the 2015 International Building Code (IBC) and find that a day care center occupancy load is 35sf per occupant. Dividing the tenant area by that figure produces the maximum occupancy load for the tenant area. Therefore, the current building code would allow nearly twice the occupancy load proposed by the applicant(55 children and 10-12 adults)and nearly 10 times the occupancy allowable by the language in the zoning ordinance (15 children). Additionally, the subject building has a fully automatic sprinkler system throughout the building and a monitored fire alarm system, both additional life safety systems not addressed in the original 1950 Town of Rye building code. The language in the zoning ordinance does not provide any specificity as to the number of occupants that could be provided if the building were Fireproof or Semi Fireproof. SUMMARY An objective comparison of the two conditions i.e. 1950 Town of Rye code vs. current 2015 IBC requirements clearly shows that the occupancy of the space can be dramatically increased from the 15 child limit without any reduction in the safety of the occupants. The addition of the fully automatic sprinkler system and the monitored fire alarm system only serve to increase and enhance the life safety quality of the building. In every respect,the proposed day care center can be fully compliant with the current 2015 IBC and meets or exceeds all standards for life safety required in the current building code. Respect Lmitted, ���AEt) gRCNVA 2 Neil Carnow 2 `t'��4110• 0 is yOQ' OF NO Site Planning Environmental Studies Civil Engineering Entitlements Landscape Architecture Construction Services Land Surveying 3D Visualization Transportation Engineering Laser Scanning MEMORANDUM D DATE: December 4, 2018 DEC - 5 2018 TO: Mr. Don M DEC oscota, Chair and VILLAGE OFF RYE BRO r�K Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals BUILDING DEPARTMENT Village of Rye Brook ALSO TO: Ms. Caryn O'Connor, Imagine Early Learning Center Steven Silverberg, Esq., Silverberg Zalantis LLP Mr. David English, Win Ridge Realty LLC Mr. Craig Samson, Win Ridge Realty LLC Village of Rye Brook Chairman and the Planning Board Members Mr. Michael Izzo, Building Inspector FROM: Ms. Lucille Munz, JMC RE: JMC Project 18124 Imagine Early Child Care Center 10 Rye Ridge Plaza, Suite 26 Bowman Ave Village of Rye Brook, NY This memorandum is in response to the Notice of Disapproval addressed to the Village of Rye Brook Planning Board, dated November 16, 2018 from Mr. Michael Izzo, Building Inspector for the Village of Rye Brook for the above noted project. We have provided responses to the three (3) sections of the Village Zoning Code that were identified by Mr. Izzo, for the Imagine Early Learning Child Care Center that Mr. Izzo indicates do not comply with the current Village Code. For your convenience we have identified the comments noted in the Notice of Disapproval below, which are followed by our responses: Comment No. 1 §250-6.H.(3)(c): The amount of required yard play area for this child day care center is 1 1,000 square feet. The applicant is proposing to provide 3,400 square feet of yard play area. Response No. I JMC Planning Engineering Landscape Architecture & Land Surveying, PLLC I JMC Site Development Consultants, LLC 120 BEDFORD ROAD I ARMONK,NY 10504 1914.273.5225 1 MAIL@1MCPLLC.COM I JMCPLLC.COM The code requires that there be 1,000 s.f. of suitability fenced rear or side yard play area for each five children or part thereof. However; the code does not clearly specify whether this requirement shall be applicable for the maximum number of children in the facility or the actual number of children using the outdoor area at any one time, per shift and/or class. Therefore, the applicant is requesting an interpretation regarding code compliance for this item and/or a variance. The applicant is proposing a child care facility that would accommodate 55 children. Of the 55 children, 9 are infants and 12 are toddlers 18 months to 3 years of age, and 34 preschoolers ages 3 years to 5 years of age. Infants would not be using the outdoor play area which reduces the number to (46) children and New York State Licensing rules note that, "Children under three years of age may not participate in mixed age groups except that for limited periods of time at the beginning and end of the child day care center's daily operation, toddlers may be in a group with preschoolers." In accordance with the above noted State licensing requirement, the toddlers would not be on the playground at the same time as the pre-schoolers. Therefore, the 12 toddlers would be using the play area independently and implementing the 1:5 ratio per 1,000 s.f., the requirement for play area would be 2,400 s.f. In addition, the 34 pre-school age children would be utilizing the play area in two class groups with a maximum number of children of 17 at one time. Implementing the same ratio of 1:5 children per 1,000 s.f. would require a play area of 3,400 s.f. The proposed space for outdoor play area is 3,400 that includes recalibration of the fencing to maximize the space that we believe meets the spirit and intent of the code requirement. The applicant also intends to utilize the adjacent public park space for walks and outdoor activities which further augments outdoor special requirements and the applicant has been in concurrent negotiations with the Village Administrator for a special licensing agreement for utilization of the adjacent park/open space should your Board determine that, despite the analysis above, additional play area is required. In furtherance of our position, we have reviewed other municipal regulations of communities within Westchester County noting requirements for required open space for child care facilities and note the following: Community Regulation North Castle 200 s.f. per child per shift Harrison Subject to NYS Dept. of Children Services Briarcliff Manor 50 s.f. per child Comment No. 2 2 §250-6.H.(3)(e): The center shall not have more than 15 children in any case, except if the building is of fireproof or semi-fireproof construction as defined by the Building Code of the Village of Rye Brook. The applicant is proposing to have 55 children in the existing shopping center building which is not fireproof or semi-fireproof construction as defined by the Building Code of the Village of Rye Brook. Response No. 2 Please see the attached letter from Mr. Neil Carnow, R.A, to the Zoning Board of Appeals, dated 12/03/2018, which provides an analysis and comparison of the 1950 Village Code with current New York State building code definitions (adopted by the Village as part of Chapter 91) and compliance. Per Mr. Carnow's letter he notes that "the current building code would allow nearly twice the occupancy load proposed by the applicant (55 children and 10-12 adults) and nearly 10 times the occupancy allowable by the language in the zoning ordinance (15 children). The applicant is requesting an interpretation on comment no. 2. Comment No. 3 §250-6.H.(3)(f): The center shall have an off-street drop-off/pickup area capable of storing 55 vehicles simultaneously delivering and/or collecting children from this facility. The applicant is providing no dedicated off-street drop-off/pickup area. Response No. 3 This comment references that a center shall have an off-street drop-off/pickup area capable of storing the maximum number of vehicles simultaneously delivering and/or collecting children from the facility. This requirement if applied to the 15-child number represented in the code, would require a drop off area of 300 linear feet (20' per car X 15 cars) to accommodate 15 cars, which is equivalent to the length of a football field, and which would present a hardship for any proposed child care facility, other than maybe an existing school and/or church with enough road frontage to accommodate this requirement, which would then likely interfere with traffic circulation on that road, unless there was an existing 300 foot turning lane into the property. Since there is adjacent and more than adequate parking spaces to accommodate drop-off and pickup at this facility, and that parents and caregivers are required to bring their children, many of whom are infants and toddlers, into the day care center per the operational rules of the applicant. Therefore, we believe that having adequate parking is better suited to effectively address this requirement and fully addresses the spirit and intent of this code requirement. In addition, curbside drop-off is not an acceptable practice in modern daycare/childcare centers since it is impractical given the complexity of removing infants and sometimes uncooperative toddlers/preschoolers from vehicles. The drop-off provision is more applicable for middle schoolers and high students. In addition, the Imagine Early Learning Center has a no-drop-off policy, all parents/caregivers must park and walk their children to and from the center; we 3 therefore believe that adhering to this aspect of the code to provide a drop-off area to simultaneously deliver and/or collect children from the proposed facility does not align with the practical aspects of dealing with young children, safety and how the center will operate in light of those considerations. Presently there is adequate and adjacent parking on site to accommodate the required parking proposed by the applicant. In addition, parent/caregiver drop-offs generally happened prior to 9:00 am, which is prior to when most of the medical and retail spaces open. The pickup times range from 4:00 — 6:30 pm, with the bulk of pickups ranging from 5:30 — 6:30 pm; which is after when most of the medical office space has closed for the day. The center is also closed on weekends, which also frees up any parking required. The applicant is requesting a variance on comment no. 3. Thank you in advance for your time and consideration on the above noted variance and interpretation considerations and we look forward to working with the Zoning Board and the Village's Building Department and Planning Board and on this important application. If you have any further comments or questions, please feel free to contact our office directly at (914) 273- 5225. p:\2018\18124\admin\applications\jmc memo—12-4-18_(rev.2).docx 4 Frederick Taylor Associates 572 North Broadway Tel 914 289 0011 Architects, P.C. white Plains,New York 10603 Fax 914 289 0022 Taylor Associates Architects October 29, 2018 D E E - Mr. Michael J. Izzo 5 DEC - 5 2018 Building& Fire Inspector Village of Rye Brook, NY VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK BUILDING DEPARTMENT RE: 10 Rye Ridge Plaza Imagine Early Learning Centers-Suite 26 Rye Brook, NY Dear Mr. Izzo: This is to advise and confirm that the Rye Ridge Plaza building construction,as defined and described in Chapter 6,of the 2015 IBC/Building Code of New York State, has a Type IIB, Non-Combustible Construction Classification. The base building construction elements consist of steel columns, open web steel floor and roof joists with masonry infill exterior walls, metal flooring decking and poured concrete slabs, all considered to be "non-combustible" construction in compliance with Section 602.2 of the NYS Building Code. Note also that an approved automatic sprinkler system with a monitored fire alarm system is installed and maintained throughout this Shopping Center, providing additional required fire protection. Thank you for your time and attention to this project. If you have any questions or require any additional documentation, please don't hesitate to contact the undersigned. '(BRED ARC Sincerely, �G,�fee T,q L. <i ` Jeffrey Taylor,AIA CC: WIN Properties- David English s .� • s 3 Q q�OF NO.t0 From: Steve Silverbera To: Lucille V. Munz.ASLA Cc: caryn a(�imao6neelc.com Subject: FW: Rye Brook Sample License Agreement Date: Tuesday,December 04,2018 2:57:38 PM ----------Forwarded message--------- From: Christopher Bradbury<CBradburydryebrook.org> Date: Fri,Nov 30, 2018 at 4:18 PM Subject: RE: Rye Brook Sample License Agreement To: Caryn O' Connor<CCaj3m .imagineelc.com> Cc: Holly Saltzman <hollX Cr imagineelc.com>, Alex Marshall <AFrankQJ� &brook.org> Dear Caryn &Holly: Please let me know if you would like us to take the next step in drafting a licensing agreement. If you are not yet ready that is okay too- I am just looking for an update. The Village Board is okay with our counsel drafting a license agreement for their review and consideration if and when you wish to proceed to this step. Thank you, Chris Bradbury Rye Brook Village Administrator From: Caryn 0' Connor [mailto:Caryn(a)imagineelc.com] Sent: Friday, November 09, 2018 12:57 PM To: Alex Marshall <AFrankPryebrook.org>; Christopher Bradbury<CBradbury(@ryebrook.org> Cc: Holly Saltzman <holly(a)imagineelc.com> Subject: Re: Rye Brook Sample License Agreement Alex and Chris, Thank you so much for your time this week speaking to us about the potential to enter into a licensing agreement with the Village of Rye Brook Board of Trustees for use of the public park area off Roanoke Ave behind Rye Ridge Plaza for our potential day care site at the Plaza. Thank you for forwarding the sample licensing agreement. We look forward to presenting the proposal of the 5%village resident discount to the Board of Trustees in exchange for permission for our enrolled children to use the park during 2-4 hours of our daily operations Monday through Friday. We hope to be in front of the Village Planning Board with our site application next week. We will be in touch with you after the Planning Board meeting. Thanks again. Best, Caryn On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 4:32 PM Alex Marshall <AFrank ,ryehro�>wrote: Hi Caryn, It was a pleasure meeting with you yesterday. As requested, attached is the electronic version of a sample license agreement. Sincerely, Alex Alexandra(Frank) Marshall Assistant to the Village Administrator Village of Rye Brook 938 King Street Rye Brook,New York 10573 Phone(914)939-00771 afi-ankQ.Q b= -or Caryn O'Connor Vice President Imagine Early Learning Centers P 646-734-3�38�I.59 all An Employee Owned Company Imaeineelc.com I Like Us Caryn O'Connor Vice President Imagine Early Learning Centers P 646-734-3859 An Employee Owned Company ImaQineelc.com I Like Us AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING LEGAL NOTICE hereby swear that the following notice was given by personal service, first class mail to the property owners listed below, at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing date also a 3' x 4' sign of Public Notice was erected two weeks prior hearing date: NOTICE IS HEREBY Given that the undersigned has filed an application to appear before the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Rye Brook. Application # 18-026 Owner: Win Ridge Realty LLC ( T� �'� —. 24 Rye Ridge Plaza D !� `� , \j7 Rye Brook, New York 10170 DEC 2 7 2018 t Applicant: Caryn O'Connor, Imagine Learning Center 250 Bedford Park Boulevard West VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK Bronx, New York 10468 BUILDING DEPARTMENT Applicant Proposes to: Operate a Child Day-Care Facility. At the premises known as 10 Rye Ridge Plaza Suite 26 in the Village of Rye Brook, New York, situated on the West side of South Ridge Street, at the intersection of Bowman Avenue and South Ridge Street, designated and shown on the most current tax map as Parcel ID# 141.27-1-7, the applicant does hereby request a variance(s) from the following applicable section(s) of the Zoning Ordinance: §250-6.11­11.(3)(c); The amount of required yard play area for this child day care center is 11,000 square feet. The applicant is proposing to provide 3,264 square feet of yard play area. Therefore a yard play area variance of 7, 736 square feet is requested or an interpretation. §250-6.H.(3)(e): The center shall not have more than 15 children in any case, except if the building is of fireproof or semi-fireproof construction as defined by the Building Code of the Village of Rye Brook. The applicant is proposing to have 55 children in the existing shopping center building which is not of fireproof or semi-fireproof construction as defined by the Building Code of the Village of Rye Brook. Therefore an interpretation of this section of the code is requested. §250-6.H.(3)(fl; The center shall have an off-street drop-off/pickup area capable of storing 55 vehicles simultaneously delivering and/or collecting children from this facility. The applicant is providing no dedicated off-street drop-off/pickup area. Therefore an interpretation and relief from this section of the code is requested. A Public Hearing on said application will be held before the Village Zoning Board of Appeals on Wednesday,January 2, 2019, at 8 o'clock p.m. at the Village of Rye Brook Offices located at 938 King Street, Rye Brook, NY 10573. Plans and other materials associated with the proposed application may be reviewed and downloaded via the Meetings/Agendas link from the Rye Brook website homepage, and are available for review at the Building Department. Ceja,Claudio The Pointe Development Group Yumart Felix O 44 Roanoke Ave 10 The Pointe 49 Roanoke Ave PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 Magri John& Lanza,Anthony The Pointe Development Group Nadine 46 Roanoke Ave 7 The Pointe 39 Westview Ave PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 The Pointe Development Group Win Ridge Shopping Ctr De-LLC Lucero Saul 2 The Pointe S. Ridge St 38 Roanoke Ave PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 The Pointe Development Group The Pointe Development Group Current Occupant 6 The Pointe 5 The Pointe PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 Morgese Diane The Pointe Development Group Win Plaza-De LLC 35 Westview Ave Bowman Ave Bowman Ave PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 Marini,Enrico The Pointe Development Group The Pointe Development Group 42 Roanoke Ave 9 The Pointe 1 The Pointe PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 Westchester County Westchester County Port Chester-Rye Ufs Distist#4 Bowman Bowman 113 Bowman Ave PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 Win Plaza-De LLC Manfredonia,George Suriano Christopher J Roanoke Ave 37 Westview Ave 40 Roanoke Ave PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 Urban,Julia Bowman III Llc The Pointe Development Group 47 Roanoke Ave 111 Bowman Ave 4 The Pointe PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 The Pointe Development Group Licare,Victoria Guglielmo,Giuseppe 3 The Pointe 36 Roanoke Ave 32 Westview Ave PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 (Applicant's Representative Signature) I-u k4le lNuN z , AL-A / (Al C 1-111C. (Applicant's Representative Name/Company) Sworn before me at 0 day of Ot ce (Notary Public) Lisa P.Kolba Encl.: Ma NOTARY PUBLIC,State of New York p No.01 k04916831 Photo of Sign Qualified in Westchester p:\2018\18124\admin\affidavit of mailing.docx Term Expires Dec.28, t,- < 'fir-: ,� •,3, K:', �7a�a.:-- , '� 4a !�F ..ter � A ,Y• ��.��_ �` �, :.• r f y _ oF s�, r «a,, - _ � .r y� � �.; - 9' m r T -_°`ems •c�• r �.. 3 '(f> .. + q :3•� '��`. !� t ' .a � It r � � .'�,...� 7�, OF ,` - ' sir? r.�'.• � K Si _ E ' � -.. /{. �. _-r'r _ � :. '4c =�. '-�.F—.-�f-' -� Yi'r —•ar . .,� ~; w .--fi�.;fp'.-.-. . 4 - `!`' _ , ._ o0 " : r=� ", >, ON -71 ysr p--4 .. .y t,:s'E } i �*rC•.i 'n`+' .3. 't%�:, .� - r�?,.,>;��m .;,p � rt it �r� r -� . ,• ... .N .:aye..=3,.c"...6r,::=t'osic`�Sy.�..✓.r�tmw.,a�=a'�ara:.'. �-.>.�1'.r.-v2�>(tW�'�i6%t��'2a '`aS ;Chiz: ':l.$'eo�'ala�. 12/1972o18 Westchester County GIS::Tax Parcel Maps Tax Parcel Maps Address: Bowman Ave Print Key: 141.27-1-7 sBL: 14102700010070000000 20 on •` •,.. ter:.� . -�F� � r 1 " ��, • 1 �� �®� � .4 .eta r 1 . Disclaimer: This tax parcel map is provided as a public service to Westchester County residents for general information and planning purposes only. and should not be relied upon as a sole informational source. The County of Westchester hereby disclaims any liability from the use of this GIS mapping system by any person or entity. Tax parcel boundaries represent approximate property line location and should NOT be interpreted as or used in lieu of a survey or property boundary description. Property descriptions must be obtained from surveys or deeds. For more information please contact the assessor's office of the municipality. https://giswww.westchestergov.com/taxmaps/layout.aspx?r=RYK213896 /1 h t � j PUBLIC NOTICE A(PUBLIC HEARING/I IEETINGI FOR A ZONING VARIANCE APPLIUMION WILL BE HEtO BY THE RYE BROOK toning Board 01 Allu"al ON IANUARY2.2019 at 8:011 PM• k - b , AT THE RYE BROOK YIIIAGE NAIL, - 7 938 KING STREET ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AYAIIABLE THE RYE BROOK BUIIOING DEPARTMENT I939-0668I COPYRIGHT d mis t l IG Al Rob R..-t Nu pad of do docunant mry ha raptod..d skrad n a r b d sy,LM cr 4amrd.d m "form r by-..,. owcbory macho l pmt ..pynp Waning or ah.. as Kdhcd dr prwr aid.n porm n of JMC PLANWTG ENGINEERING. LANDSCAFE ARCMTECT URE d LAND SURVEYNG.PLLC I AAC SITE DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS_ LLC I JOMI ME) ER CGNSUL TING. NC.JJUCJ Any m ckfKMcns or a4rahone to the dorunanf •d-A N wden pernu,mon or JMC Mel mndar IMm maw and u obio. I I I V cAJo /03 El l o c ' � I ' �f<Z o D rn i Cal N 716 d O COD tD (D N C 0 CO) am O -� C• > = = = 0 IV o 3•� -*"0 A C 00 = 'n = N o 0-0 C> � �a•�sa' CD w >> 0 I I -0 o ao cn• a I �.-� �a� aU� c? �o� �«-� o��rn cD�orn o coNC-)0 cn 0?�0-4- ornw 000w O� 0 ov O O O C" O �' � CD ,a ao � xcD 0 n 0 j ?•C caX•� M C <. 0 —1 ? a j -1 dot '1 (D lcr n F O �- O O C p� p 0 0 A (D dw� O U3o.Q -, d,�,? c�o.sc��F�C cD OLIO J ono ,. ? �, b0 cD cr 0 (D A CD -0 �D N C O ca O -0 O a G �-�. -O+, G (D c0 -0 d _ S CL _! -0 (D a �, co to O? •p O n g . O C �D O O O 0 0 (DZ cA CL (D CD O C O • 3 c<D �. . a�� 0 �T�'o �o o v; ._� o a -4,0 d+ • cD� • O � •� �o o �-5 3 d a C cA 0o�o° on "0 N C --h a� •p O� ' c 0 4 _ . _. _ o 0 �tp n'cD �'0 o < O a. n CID-n 0 " O n 0 �• 0 O G =Cr C�C -.% O0 �D O -v sC �=n �o'o elf, con*_ 0 N No AR ING COMPLIANCE PLAN F� � PROPOSED IMAGINE EARLY LEARNING CENTER RYE RIDGE SHOPPING CENTER RYE RIDGE PLAZA VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK. NY O eoftAN A �- c�r � WAY �nTM VENV�' ARIes; PUBUC) I I I I L. . ........... ag WESNr Z--------'T_ APPLICANT: IMAGINE EARLY LEARNING CENTERS 250 BEDFORD PARK BLVD WEST BRONX, NY 10468 COPYRIGHT @ nil by JMC AAROO R-wA Nb, afti ilmarNmq Im"ro--d •bored o • nbrvd oToan a bmsnmd n r r lertn cr br m••n•, •hcben c. m.chn •L S pb•bocepSnq. ncadry w •tlur•o gft A d. p,., ftgp..*wdJkCFLANWa ENGINEERING. IANOSCAPE ARCMTECTURE d LA D SURVEYING. PLLC I AMC SITE CEVELOP►1ENT CONSULTANTS. LLC I JOMN LEI ER CGNSULTING. INC. (AICF AnyrroAiermu a tAMneru to No docurwt ■tlwd the •ntbn p•mu»ron of AMC c1Y•1 ender ttrm m•Ld mW -bk. O i I -% Ro I ' I m I I r I ► �0ton� 1 I ► a3(n—(n o D I I . HZ \ �1 00 Crn Z I 00 O ::j 00 �z D D r m D0 m D � o O 0 O 0 0 N O \0, cAAwr \ \ Cot'C wµ O J I 1 65.0 40.9t CpIyC WALK Dc Z mI m QCC) I ww pus 8 0- I t �� •Op rm D�G7 I rn mG)m _ a ' Z�0 a `'' mv= \ I m I m- n� r-I I m D \ r i \ .................. Q \ \ . 0-0 I\ \ c> ZDm >2m-v ° 0z O-0 �v� 5. 5mo �� c)0 -0> rO vO0FrnZ rnm a �mi0 yrn Nmv �' -vim z X7v0 z n� ---------- n c w D �m mO� OZ� —� D O io vXO VrTi0 mc:) ZVD Zc� D m D m v = 0 7ZC� fmTiZ� 0 vvD z r� my m '— n v D m � o SITE BLOWUP PLAN tV s 2 V NOS PROPOSED IMAGINE EARLY ",.A- CENTER RYE RIDGE SHOPPING CENTER RYE RIDGE PLAZA VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK, NY � O- �i CVR9 I R APPLICANT: IMAGINE EARLY LEARNING CENTERS 250 BEDFORD PARK BLVD WEST BRONX, NY 10468 Mike Izzo From: Mike Izzo Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2019 2:44 PM To: 'Lucille V. Munz, ASLA' Subject: FW:Imagine Early Learning Dear Ms. Munz, The Building Department received the revised plans on Tuesday, however the set doesn't include the interior alterations. As this is all under one permit the plan set must reflect the entire scope of work. Please provide two complete sets of plans for review. Thank you. Al /4 /U, �ZZO Building& Fire Inspector Village of Rye Brook, NY Phone—(914) 939-0668 Fax—(914) 939-5801 mizzoAryebrook.org From: Mike Izzo Sent: Monday,April 22, 2019 3:18 PM To: 'Lucille V. Munz, ASLA' <LMunz@jmcpllc.com> Subject: RE: Imagine Early Learning Dear Ms. Munz, The Building Department needs two complete sealed sets for permitting. The permit fee is still pending, and is based on the estimated cost of the entire job at the rate of$22.00/$1,000.00 of construction cost. lffi a4d(l /zzo Building & Fire Inspector Village of Rye Brook, NY Phone—(914) 939-0668 Fax—(914) 939-5801 mizzonryebrook.org From: Lucille V. Munz,ASLA [mailto:LMunz@imcpllc.com] Sent: Monday,April 22, 2019 11:31 AM To: Mike Izzo<Mlzzo@rvebrook.org> Subject: RE: Imagine Early Learning Hi Mickey the plans are done, quick question how many stamped sets do you need? Also any additional fees? From: Mike Izzo<Mlzzo@ryebrook.org> Sent:Wednesday,April 17, 2019 8:32 AM 1 To: Lucille V. Munz,ASLA<LMunz@imcpllc.com> Subject: Imagine Early Learning Dear Ms. Munz, Just inquiring as to the status of the final construction plans for the center and play area. Thank you. Iffk1wel(l /zzo Building & Fire Inspector Village of Rye Brook, NY Phone—(914) 939-0668 Fax—(914) 939-5801 mizzoAryebrook.org 2 Site Planning Environmental Studies Civil Engineering Entitlements Landscape Architecture Construction Services Land Surveying 3D Visualization Transportation Engineering Laser Scanning November 6, 2018 ED L Mr. Michael Izzo Building & Fire Inspector Village of Rye Brook 938 King Street OK Rye Brook, NY 10573 RE: JMC Project 18124 Imagine Early Child Care Center 10 Rye Ridge Plaza, Suite 26 Bowman Ave Village of Rye Brook, NY Dear Mr. Izzo: We are in receipt of your review memorandum to the Village of Rye Brook Planning Board, dated October 29, 2018 for the above noted project. We appreciate your clarification of several provisions of the Village Code and how it may relate to our client's application. Respectfully, we believe that there may be room for further interpretation. At a minimum, we wish to provide additional information for your office and the Planning Board to consider. Beyond this phase, we recognize that this matter may require either an interpretation by the Zoning Board of Appeals or the need for a variance. For your convenience we have identified the comments noted in the memorandum below, which are followed by our responses: Comment No. I §250-6.H.(3)(c): The lot for such use must contain at least I,000 square feet of suitably fenced rear or side yard play area for each five children or part thereof, and each such play area shall be located not less than 30 feet from any lot line except where the rear or side yard lot line abuts a public park or parkway property and not less than 50 feet from any residential structure on any adjoining lot. Such play area shall be suitably screened with planting or other means to avoid a noise nuisance to adjoining properties. The applicant's proposal calls for a total of 55 children, which requires a minimum of I I,000 square feet of approved play area. The applicant is proposing to provide a total of 3,264 square feet of code compliant play area. JMC Planning Engineering Landscape Architecture & Land Surveying, PLLC I JMC Site Development Consultants, LLC 120 BEDFORD ROAD I ARMONK, NY 10504 1914.273.5225 1 MAIL@JMCPLLC.COM I JMCPLLC.COM Response No. I §250-6.H(3)(c) As indicated of the Village Code requires that there is to be at least 1,000 s.f. of suitable fenced play area for each five children. Adhering to this interpretation of the code we would require 11,000 s.f. of play space to accommodate all proposed 55 children of the child care center. The applicant is proposing to utilize a fenced in lawn area of 3,264 s.f. which falls short of the noted maximum by 7,736 square feet. We offer the following information and clarification for consideration as follows: • That applicant will not be bringing all 55 children outside at the same time. The applicant will be utilizing the outside space in class groups ranging 14 — 20 children at one time. This equates to requiring 2,800 s.f. to 4,000 s.f. of suitable area. • In addition to the proposed fenced area specifically for the children attending the facility, the applicant is proposing to utilize the existing adjacent park to augment activities as well. The applicant has been in discussion with the Village Administrator about the use of the adjacent parkland. The applicant has recently met with the Village Adminstrator to develop terms for a potential licensing agreement with the Village for use of the public park space. The current proposal would also include a 5% tuition discount for Village residents enrolled in the child care center. • Another consideration includes the makeup of the age groups of the children which will be: o (9) infants ages 6 weeks — 18 months o (12) toddlers ages 18 months — 3 yrs. o (34) preschoolers — ages 3 yrs — 5 yrs. The applicant's operation is intended to include infants. The infants will not be using the play area, but will be pushed in buggies by staff along the pathway at the existing adjacent park. The Village Code requires that the proposed play area be located not less than 30 feet from any lot line except where the rear or side yard lot line abuts a public park or parkway property and not less than 50' from any residential side yard. The applicant is proposing to utilize a fenced in lawn area and we offer the following information and clarification for consideration as follows: • The area designated for the play area abuts a public park with the closest lot line 25' away, which meets the Village Code • The applicant meets the requirement of minimum of 50' from any existing residence with the closest residential dwelling 67' away • In order to help mitigate any potential sound the proposed chain link fence will include vinyl strips. Comment No. 2 §250-6.H.(3)(e): The center shall not have more than 15 children in any case, except if the building is of fireproof or semi-fireproof construction as defined by the Building Code of the Village of Rye Brook. The existing shopping center buildings are not of fireproof or semi-(reproof construction. The standard for fireproof semi-fireproof construction set by this section of code is a hold-over from the old Town of Rye (ToR) Building Code adopted on 1215150, and in place when the shopping center was constructed. The terms "fireproof' and "semi-fireproof' are antiquated and not consistent with construction type classifications contained in the current NYSUFP&BC. Therefore, a comparison was made between the definitions of"fireproof' and "semi-fireproof' os contained in the ToR code. and the actual construction type classification of the existing shopping center buildings as defined by the 2015 international Building Code (IBC). It has been determined that the existing shopping center building construction as •defined by the IBC is Type II B, which is defined in Table 60 1 of the IBC as having no fire resistance rating on any structural members. This falls short of the requirements for fire resistance rated structural members set by the ToR Code for fireproof and for semi-fireproof construction. It should be noted that the existing shopping center buildings are fully protected with a code compliant fire suppression sprinkler system, the existence of which was not contemplated by the ToR Code. Response No. 2 As noted in your comment above, it appears that the Village's fire code is antiquated and not consistent with the construction type classifications. On October 29, 2018 Win Properties provided a certified letter from Jeffrey Taylor, RA, AIA confirming that the building construction, as defined and describe in Chapter 6, of the 2015/I13C Building Code of New York State, has a Type I I B, Non-Combustible Construction Classification. In addition, the building has an approved automatic sprinkler system with a monitored fire alarm system. See the attached letter for reference. We therefore believe that the fire code is being met in accordance with IBC Building Code of New York State. Comment No. 3 §250-6.H.(3)(0): The center shall have an off-street drop-off/pickup area capable of storing the maximum number of vehicles simultaneously delivering and/or collecting children from the facility. The proposed location for the center is the Rye Ridge Plaza Building, which fronts on and is supported by the western-most parking lot located adjacent to the passive park. This is a shared lot and not exclusive to any single tenant. The applicant has not provided the information needed to determine if the existing Win Ridge shared parking lot at this location can support this requirement. Response No. 3 All parents/caregivers must park and walk their children to and from the center; therefore, a drop-off/pick area to simultaneously deliver and/or collect children from the proposed facility does not align with how the childcare facility operates, nor will it be necessary. It is our client's experience that, in several instances, families have two children in the daycare and on any given day, some children could be out for sickness and/or vacation. The parent/caregiver drop-offs generally occur prior to 9:00 am, which is prior to when most of the medical office and retail spaces open. Generally, most pickups occur between 5:30 and 6:30 pm; which is after when most of the medical office spaces have closed for the day. In addition, the day care center is also closed on weekends, which would eliminate the parking demand for the proposed use on weekends. Based on recommended parking ratios as published in the "Dimensions of Parking 5th Edition" by Urban Land Institute (ULI), the parking recommended for day care facilities is less than medical office use. ULI recommends a parking ratio of 4.5 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross foot area which equates to 21 spaces for the existing 4,464 square foot medical office use. ULI recommends a parking ratio of 0.3 parking spaces per child which equates to 17 spaces for the proposed day care facility accommodating 55 children. As shown, the proposed daycare has a reduction of 4 parking spaces compared to the existing medical office use. Thank you for your consideration. We look forward to working with the Planning Board and your office on this important application. If you have any further comments or questions, please feel free to contact our office directly at (914) 273-5225. Sincerely, JMC Planning Engineering Landscape Architecture & Land Surveying, PLLC w& ucille Munz, RLA, ASLA Senior Landscape Architect Cc: Village of Rye Brook Chairman and the Planning Board Members pA2018118124\odmin\1tcomment response 11-06-2018.docx ,.,0, uearning centers D F � 1E �M[ JUL 2 0 2018 www.imagineelc.com a011 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK )�f�111/oYee Owned coMp BUILDING DEPARTMENT Operational Statement to Building Department, Village of Rye Brook Submitted by: Imagine Early Learning Centers 250 Bedford Park Blvd West Bronx, NY 10468 Contact: Caryn O'Connor, Vice President caryn(cbimagineelc.com (646) 734-3859 Imagine Early Learning Centers, LLC. is a management firm dedicated to the development and management of full day, high quality and educational child care programs serving working professional parents in the New York metro area. Imagine's Executive team has over forty years of experience in the design and management of child care centers in the greater New York area. We have functioned as project and facility managers in all aspects of center development. We ensure our company's responsiveness to the individual, changing needs of the families we serve. Imagine currently operates ten centers, seven at employer-sponsored sites and 3 private: (Inception of operations in parenthesis): Imagine @ Brooklyn Heights (1989) Imagine @ Brooklyn, DUMBO (2009) Imagine @ BSC Kids, Internal Revenue Service, Holtsville, NY (1999) Imagine @ Courtyard Kids, Federal/State Courts, Central Islip, (2003) Imagine @ CUNY, Lehman College (also site of our home office) (1986) Imagine @ Jamaica Kids, Social Security Administration, Jamaica, NY (1997) Imagine @ Mt. Sinai Kids, Mt Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY (1990) Imagine @ Port Washington (1993) Imagine @ Newark Federal Kids, Rodino Federal Building, Newark, NJ (1996) Imagine @ Vets Kids, Veterans Administration Hospital, New York, NY (1994) Imagine's child care centers are all fully licenced and also nationally accredited by the National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC), the benchmark of the highest quality in early childhood education. Our centers serve children from six weeks to 5 years of age with hours of operation meeting the needs of the client population. Imagine Early Learning Centers, LLC Web www.imagineelc.com 250 Bedford Park Blvd West Fax 718 960,5192 Bronx, NY 10468 Telephone 718 960.7436 ECE �rt�Y�earniny Cefers R 11 � -� JUL 20 2018 C-) Ne VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK www,imayineolc.com � BUILDING DEPARTMENT '),�117PIOYee Owned C0 '0 1P a� In January 2018, Imagine ELC became an Employee Owned Company or ESOP (Employee Stock Ownership Plan), reflecting the value we place on our dedicated and long-serving employees who maintain our high quality standards leading to the success of our centers. Rye Ridge Plaza Proposal Clientele: Professional parents of Rye Brooke, Rye and surrounding areas of Westchester and Connecticut. Professionals working in office parks in Cross Westchester Corridor. We have an established connection with parent clients from the recently closed employer sponsored center for AVON Products. Capacity: Four classrooms serving 55 children (subject to NY State day care licensing approval through the Office of Children and Family Services), Hours: 7 am-6:30 pm, Monday-Friday (Center not open on weekends). Parking: Parents dropping off children from 7-8:30 am and picking up from 5-6:30 pm. 8-10 employees parking for 9 hours daily. Respectfully Submitted, u Caryn O'Connor Vice President Imagine Early Learning Centers, LLC Web www.ifnagineelc.com 250 Bedford Park Blvd West Fax 718 960.5192 Bronx, NY 10468 Telephone 718 960.7436 A,, FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. PLANNING,TRANSPORTATION,ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT RYE, NEW YORK FAIRFIELD,CONNECTICUT MICHAELk GALANTE MEMORANDUM MANAGING PRINCIPAL DAVID H.STOLMAN AICP, PP, PRINCIPAL To: Robert I. Goodman, Chairman and the Planning Board of the Village 350THEO.FREMDAVE. of Rye Brook RYE,NEW YORK 10580 914 967-6540 FAX:914 967-6615 Date: December 27, 2018 CONNECTICUT 203 255-3100 Subject: 10 Rye Ridge Plaza— Special Permit and Site Plan for Imagine HUDSON VALLEY Early Learning Center—Traffic and Parking Review 845 297-6056 LONG ISLAND 516 364-4544 This memorandum supplements the memorandum prepared by our office and dated www.fpclark.com December 26, 2018, with regard to the request for a Special Permit and Site Plan email@fpdark.com Approval to operate a Child Day Care Center. The following sections provide our comments, with regard to traffic and parking impacts. Project Description The Applicant's proposal is to convert 4,464 square feet of floor area in an existing commercial building located in the westerly portion and rear of the Rye Ridge Shopping Center to a Day Care Facility. The space was formerly a Pediatric Medical Practice. It is unclear from the Applicant's submission if the Day Care Facility will have access to only the rear of this building in what is considered the lower level or the front of the building which is considered the upper level, with access to a large parking area. The Application is to provide a Day Care Facility for 55 children, with a staff of up to 12 people. Traffic Comments Prior to the Applicant providing additional information with regard to the traffic comments below, clarification is needed on where parents and caregivers will actually access the building. It is unclear from the Plan submitted to the Village if access will be provided from the easterly or westerly side of the existing building. FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. PLANNING,TRANSPORTATION, ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT RYE, NEW YORK FAIRFIELD,CONNECTICUT The Applicant should provide traffic related information for the conversion of the Medical Office Use to a Day Care Facility, The Application did not provide any reference to either daily or peak hour traffic for each of these uses. Referring to trip generation rates provided by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) and published in "Trip Generation," 10th Edition, 2017, a Medical Office Use is estimated to generate 155 vehicle trip ends during a typical weekday condition. This same use is estimated to generate 12 and 15 vehicle trip ends during the weekday morning and weekday afternoon peak hours, respectively, based on the 4,464 square feet of floor area noted above. In each case average rates were used. Using the same ITE publication noted above, a Day Care Facility with 55 children, is estimated to generate 220 vehicle trip ends during a typical weekday and 43 vehicle trip ends during both the weekday morning and weekday afternoon peak hours. A comparison of both the daily and weekday peak hour conditions for each land use indicates that the Day Care Facility will generate more traffic and; therefore, will have an additional impact on area roadways and the Shopping Center driveways. The Applicant notes that the majority of the site traffic related to the Day Care Facility will arrive prior to 9:00 A,M, and depart generally between 5:30 and 6:30 P.M. Therefore, the Applicant should provide a more detailed site traffic generation comparison, with reference to the attached Table 1 prepared by this office, and determine potential impacts to adjacent roadways and specifically the site driveways to be used by this Applicant to Bowman Avenue. As noted above, clarification is needed to better understand where parents and caregivers will park and walk children into the building. The arrival of children during the morning peak hour will likely coincide with School-related activities on Bowman Avenue and the nearby Middle School. At the end of the day when children and parents are departing from the Day Care Facility the pick-up activity will coincide with commuter traffic, as well as restaurant-related traffic within the Shopping Center. The Applicant should conduct a Traffic Study, which includes actual turning movement counts when Schools are open and during appropriate weather conditions and capacity analyses for existing and future traffic conditions at the following locations: Bowman Avenue at South Ridge Street (signalized); Bowman Avenue at Rye Ridge Plaza center driveway/Port Chester Middle School access drive; and, Bowman Avenue at Rye Ridge Plaza west access drive/Port Chester Middle School access drive. 2 FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. PLANNING,TRANSPORTATION, ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT RYE,NEW YORK FAIRFIELD,CONNECTICUT These traffic counts should be conducted during the typical week periods and include at least the following time periods: Weekday morning —7:00 to 9:30 P.M.; and Weekday afternoon —4:00 to 6:30 P.M. The traffic counts should identify all School bus and pedestrian activity at the intersections noted above. Furthermore, accident history should be obtained from the Village Police for Bowman Avenue at each of the locations listed above for at least a 3-year period. This data should be summarized and any high accident locations should be identified, The baseline traffic volumes noted above should be expanded to reflect a future design year, as appropriate, and analyze the net increase in traffic between the former use and proposed use of the building area noted above. Capacity analyses should be completed for the intersections to determine potential impacts, if any, and indicate any need for mitigation. Parking Comments The Village requires that a drop-off/pick-up area is provided for any Day Care Facility. However, the Applicant has indicated that the proposed user of this facility has a no drop-off policy. Therefore, all parents/caretakers will be required to park in an available parking space and walk children into the building. As noted above, it is unclear where parents will enter the building. At the end of the day the parent/caregiver will be required to park in a parking space and walk into pick-up the children. Therefore, there is need for parking during both the morning and afternoon time periods related to the Day Care use. The Applicant should complete a limited parking evaluation of the parking areas(s) closest to the entrance to the building, which is either the rear of the building or front of the building to determine if there is available parking to serve the needs of this proposed use. It is recommended that a Parking Utilization Study be completed in 15-minute increments near the entrance to the building during the hours noted above for the Traffic Study to determine if adequate parking will be provided. It is recommended that the Applicant contact this office prior to scheduling any parking counts to discuss the area(s) to be counted based on additional information identifying the entrance to the building. The parking evaluation should include a comparison of the Medical Office parking requirements required by the Village, as well as any information provided by ITE, for reference purposes. This comparison should include the proposed Day Care Facility parking requirements based on Village standards and ITE and in this case the Applicant's opinion of the anticipated parking demand for this specific use. 3 FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. PLANNING,TRANSPORTATION, ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT RYE, NEW YORK FAIRFIELD,CONNECTICUT Summary Until we have the information, as requested above for both traffic and parking needs, a final determination cannot be provided on potential impacts and need for mitigation. Michael A. Galante Managing Principal cc; Honorable Mayor and the Village Board of Trustees Christopher Bradbury, Village Administrator Michal Nowak, Superintendent of Public Work/Village Engineer Jennifer Gray, Esq., Village Attorney James Ryan, RLA for the Applicant Lucille Munz, RLA for the Applicant j:ldocs25D01rye brcok1rye18-002.rnag.docx:cg 4 Table 1 ESTIMATION OF SITE TRAFFIC GENERATION Imagine Early Child Care Center Rye Brook, New York VEHICLE TRIP ENDS Weekday Weekday Land Use Size Daily Morning Afternoon Medical Office 4,464 SF 155 12 15 -- Da Care 55 Children 220 43 43 Source; Estimates for site traffic for each land use based on trip rates published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) in "Trip Generation," 10th Edition, 2017. Frederick P. Clark Associates, Inc. j:ldocsP i)&ye brook1538.718 imagine eady child care center.docx:cg FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. PLANNING,TRANSPORTATION,ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT RYE,NEW YORK FAIRFIELD,CONNECTICUT MICHAEL A. GALANTE MEMORANDUM MANAGING PRINCIPAL DAVID H. STOLMAN To: Robert I. Goodman, Chairman, and the AICP,PP,PRINCIPAL Planning Board of the Village of Rye Brook 350 THEO.FREMD AVE. RYE, NEW YORK 10580 Date: December 26, 2018 914 967.6540 FAX: 914 967.6615 CONNECTICUT Subject: 10 Rye Ridge Plaza — Special Permit and 203 255-3100 Site Plan for Imagine Early Learning Center HUDSON VALLEY 845 297-6056 As requested, we reviewed an application submitted by Caryn O'Connor, Vice LONG ISLAND President and Executive Director of Imagine Early Learning Centers, on behalf of the 516 364.4544 property owner, Win Properties, Inc. for a special permit and a site plan to operate a www.fpclark.com child daycare center at property located at 10 Rye Ridge Plaza (Parcel ID 141.27-1- email@fpciark.com 7) on the Town of Rye Tax Map within the C1-P District and the Bowman Avenue Scenic Road Overlay District. Property Description The 4,464 space is located within the commercial building adjacent to the western edge of the Rye Ridge Shopping Center, and it is adjacent to the new Rye Ridge Park under construction. The space was formerly a pediatric medical practice. Project Description The application proposes a child-care facility for 55 children and a staff of 10 to 12 caregivers. The 55 children will range in age from infants to pre-kindergarten youngsters. The applicant has stated the hours of operation to be 7:00 am to 6:30 pm, Monday to Friday. The facility will be located on the lower level of the building, and will use a currently vacant open area in the southwestern corner of the shopping center as an outdoor play space. Review We reviewed the following applications, documents and other material submitted in support of the application: 1 :. Ig FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. PLANNING,TRANSPORTATION,ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT RYE,NEW YORK FAIRFIELD,CONNECTICUT 1. Application for Special Permit dated 9/5/18 2. Application for Site Plan Approval dated 9/5/18 3. Site Plan Submittal Review Check List dated 8/30/18 4. Short Environmental Assessment Form (Part 1) dated 8/30/18 and EAF Mapper Summary Report dated 8/29/18 5. Exterior Building Permit Application dated October 26, 2018 6. Letter to the Rye Brook Board of Trustees from John Meyer Consulting, Armonk, N.Y., dated August 30, 2018 7. Letter to the Rye Brook Building and Fire Inspector from John Meyer Consulting, Armonk, N.Y., dated November 6, 2018 8. Memorandum to the Planning Board from the Rye Brook Building and Fire Inspector dated October 29, 2018 9. Engineer's Plans prepared by John Meyer Consulting, Armonk, N.Y.: Sheet Number Sheet Title Dated C-1 Cover Sheet 8/30/18 rev. 10/26/18 S-1 Overall Existing Site Map 8/30/18 rev. 10/26/18 S-2 Site Plan 8/30/18 rev. 10/26/18 ALTA-1 AL TA/ACSM Land Title Survey 7/12/13 Please note that our review is limited to planning and environmental issues. We offer the following comments regarding the applications.- 1 Survey. Site plan applications require a current topographic survey, which was not provided. The survey should include all areas of the site pertinent to specific use by the application. The applicant may request a waiver of the requirement in writing for review and approval by the Village Engineer. 2. Zoning. The Building Inspector's zoning analysis indicates the project does not comply with the area requirements for the fenced, outdoor play area; the number of children to be cared for; and the provision of a pickup/drop off area capable of handling the vehicles delivering or dropping off children using the facility. The applicant has petitioned the Zoning Board of Appeals for variances. 3. Special Permit. A child day-care center is a use permitted by special permit that requires the use, and its site plan, to comply with the requirements of Section 250-6 H.(1) and (3). The applicant should provide evidence to the Planning Board that the project complies with all the special permit requirements of the section or evidence of vairnaces. A detailed narrative regarding the daily operations of the facility, its 2 FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. PLANNING,TRANSPORTATION,ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT RYE,NEW YORK FAIRFIELD,CONNECTICl1T hourly schedules, child to staff ratios, typical outdoor play periods and numbers of children involved during each period, a breakdown of the expected numbers and ages of the children, typical numbers of drop offs and retrievals by parents anticipated throughout the day, and the lengths of care per day provided by the facility (i.e., all- day, half day, hourly, etc.). 4. Site Plan. The proposed site plan is vague regarding the physical details of the project. The site plan should clearly indicate the exact locations of all building entries and exits to be used for drop-off and retrieval of children and the conduct of children and personnel to and from the remote outdoor play area. A proposed plan of the interior space should be provided. A plan for the exterior play area and any play equipment located there should be provided. 5. Transportation. Our traffic and parking comments will be submitted in a separate memorandum to the Board. We look forward to discussion with the Planning Board, and will continue our review when the additional information requested is provided. Marilyn Timpone-Mohamed, RLA, AICP Senior Associate/Planning/Environment Cc: Honorable Mayor and the Village Board of Trustees Christopher Bradbury, Village Administrator Michal Nowak, Superintendent of Public Work/Village Engineer Jennifer Gray, Esq., Village Attorney James Ryan, RLA for the Applicant Lucille Munz, RLA for the Applicant j l docs215001rye brookl538.778.70ryeridgeplaza.daycarespecialpermitsiteplan.memo 1.docm 3 Mike Izzo From: Mike Izzo Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2019 11:11 AM To: Lucille V. Munz, ASLA Cc: Caryn O' Connor; Drew Gamils; tgerardi@ryebrook.org; Planning Board; Christopher Bradbury Subject: Imagine Early Learning Center, 10 Rye Ridge Plaza Dear Ms.Munz, As a follow-up to last night's Zoning Board meeting I have reviewed the ADA code; ICC A117.1-2009,as well as the 2015 IEBC. Based on my research it is my determination that not only must your client provide a code compliant accessible route to the outdoor play area,but must also show compliance with regard to sanitary facilities, sales& service counters,and anything else required under the accessibility codes for this proposed change in occupancy classification. Please provide complete plans showing full compliance with the applicable ADA codes for review. Thank you. lfflGi ael (/, �ZZO Building&Fire Inspector Village of Rye Brook, NY Phone—(914)939-0668 Fax—(914)939-5801 mizzoAryebrook.org 1 BUILDING DEPARTMENT VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK 938 KING STREET RYE BRooK,NY 10573 (914)939-0668 Phone (914)939-5801 Fax mizzo(&jyebrook.org Memorandum To: Planning Board From: Michael J. Izzo, Building&Fire Inspector CC: Date: March 11,2019 Re: Imagine Early Learning Center, 10 Rye Ridge Plaza, Revised Plans received 3/5/19 The applicant has revised the site plans such that the proposed outdoor play area is compliant with all ADA accessibility codes. Michal Nowak From: Michal Nowak Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2018 10:51 AM To: 'DEnglish@winprop.com' Subject: Child Day Care Application Mr. English, Mike Izzo has forwarded to my attention the application for"Imagine"Day Care.The application needs to go before the planning board and the following items need to be addressed before the application can go onto an agenda.Just as a FYI, the next Planning Board meeting is September 13,2018. There are no meetings in August. Information needed is as follows: 1. Completed Site Plan Application with Short Form EAF to be completed online. 2. Parking/Traffic Analysis—Explain current use and its parking/traffic patterns and provide information regarding the proposed situation. 3. Hours of operations,number of kids,employees, Parking, drop off/pickup area.... How many cars per hour for drop offs??? 4. That intersection at South Ridge and Bowman is a tough signal and the impact will be huge,where will parents come in and out of, shopping center wise. AfkPeae I- Nowak Superintendent of Public Works Village Engineer ISA Arborist Village of Rye Brook 938 King Street Rye Brook,NY 10573 P:914-939-0753 x 2965 F:914-939-5801 "Ja6 is 4Uoa1#a—9lie&aut6eat of it&6 VWage„ yg t v 1 Site Planning Environmental Studies Civil Engineering Entitlements Landscape Architecture Construction Services Land Surveying 3D Visualization Transportation Engineering Laser Scanning March 4, 2019 Chairman Goodman and Members of the Planning Board Village of Rye Brook REVISED E M 938 King Street Rye Brook, NY 10573 PLANS MAR -5 2019 RE: JMC Project 18124 DATED: OF RYE BROOK Imagine Early Learning Center BUILDING DEPARTMENT 10 Rye Ridge Plaza, Suite 26 Bowman Avenue Village of Rye Brook, NY Supplemental Response to ADA Compliance requirements for access to Play Area Dear Chairman Goodman and respective Board Members: We have prepared this letter to summarize our revisions to the current drawings dated 3-4-19, which are in response to comments we received from the Planning Board members at the February 14, 2019 Planning Board Meeting and comments from Mr. Michael Izzo, Building Inspector on a meeting that we had with him and Jennifer Grey, ESQ. and Steven Silverberg, ESQ on Tuesday February 26, 2019. Below please note our changes to the drawings and explanations as follows: 1) As suggested by the Planning Board, Mr. Izzo has indicated that an ADA accessible route is required. Therefore, we have noted the route with: a. New sidewalk connection at the Lester sidewalk area which meets cross pitch requirements. b. Added an additional Pedestrian Ahead sign noted on the drawings. c. Provided construction details and details for the ramp including handrails. 2) Mr. Izzo also requested that we consider painting a crosswalk behind the parking in the dead-end lot for the pedestrian access to the play area. In speaking to our traffic engineers and staff, we believe that this may create a false sense of security for pedestrians and would be confusing for those parking in this area; and for those reasons we have not included extended crosswalk line painting. 3) Mr. Izzo requested that we consider placing a mobile yield to pedestrian sign in the proposed crosswalk like those within the complex already, if it could fit physical. The sign would conflict with the adjacent parking; thus, we have not incorporated the sign. JMC Planning Engineering Landscape Architecture & Land Surveying, PLLC I JMC Site Development Consultants, LLC 120 BEDFORD ROAD I ARMONK, NY 10504 1914.273.5225 1 MAIL@JMCPLLC.C6M I JMCPLLC.COM � r 4) Mr. Izzo requested clarification on the parking of Lester's delivery trucks along the road. We checked with Win Properties, who inquired with Lester's on the number and time of deliveries as summarize as follows: The Lester's manager noted that the activity at their side loading door location which is in the area near the proposed crosswalk, gets 4 to 5 deliveries a day at various times utilizing their own small conventional vans as well as UPS. Given that these deliveries are with smaller vans, and occur intermittently throughout the day, and that pedestrians are already crossing the road at this location, the installation of a new crosswalk along with yield to pedestrian signs would serve to improve the overall safety in this area of the complex. 5) We are also proposing to include an ADA compliant parking space with adjacent access ramp next to the play area. 6) The applicant has also agreed to place a sign in their vestibule, that if a visitor needs assistance with access to the play area, that they should contact the child care staff and the staff will assist with these accommodations. 7) The applicant has also decided to change two of the following items: a. Remove the shed from the project b. Propose to install landscape screening instead of fencing for buffering from the neighbors. 8) In addition, we have provided a video prepared by the applicant illustrating how they use safety measures in crossing streets at their other childcare facility locations. We believe that these proposed changes in this supplemental submission satisfactorily addresses the comments regarding ADA compliance for access to the play area, and comply because they are: • Providing an ADA access route • Proving ADA adjacent parking and • Proving signage with the facility Sincerely, JMC Planning Engineering Landscape Architecture & Land Surveying, PLLC S . " ,VY Z�7 Lucille S. Munz, RLA Senior Landscape Architect Attachments PA2018V8124WDMIMhGoodman 03-4-2019.docx 2 Site Planning Environmental Studies Civil Engineering Entitlements Landscape Architecture Construction Services Land Surveying 3D Visualization Transportation Engineering Laser Scanning November 6, 2018 Mr. Michael Izzo Building & Fire Inspector Village of Rye Brook 938 King Street Rye Brook, NY 10573 RE: JMC Project 18124 Imagine Early Child Care Center 10 Rye Ridge Plaza, Suite 26 Bowman Ave Village of Rye Brook, NY Dear Mr. Izzo: We are in receipt of your review memorandum to the Village of Rye Brook Planning Board, dated October 29, 2018 for the above noted project. We appreciate your clarification of several provisions of the Village Code and how it may relate to our client's application. Respectfully, we believe that there may be room for further interpretation. At a minimum, we wish to provide additional information for your office and the Planning Board to consider. Beyond this phase, we recognize that this matter may require either an interpretation by the Zoning Board of Appeals or the need for a variance. For your convenience we have identified the comments noted in the memorandum below, which are followed by our responses: Comment No. 1 §250-6.H.(3)(c): The lot for such use must contain at least 1,000 square feet of suitably fenced rear or side yard play area for each five children or part thereof; and each such play area shall be located not less than 30 feet from any lot line except where the rear or side yard lot line abuts a public park or parkway property and not less than 50 feet from any residential structure on any adjoining lot. Such play area shall be suitably screened with planting or other means to avoid a noise nuisance to adjoining properties. The applicant's proposal calls for a total of 55 children, which requires a minimum of 11,000 square feet of approved play area. The applicant is proposing to provide a total of 3,264 square feet of code compliant play area. JMC Planning Engineering Landscape Architecture & Land Surveying, PLLC JMC Site Development Consultants, LLC 120 BEDFORD ROAD ARMONK, NY 10504 914.273.5225 MAIL@JMCPLLC.COM JMCPLLC.COM Response No. I §250-6.H(3)(c) As indicated of the Village Code requires that there is to be at least 1,000 s.f. of suitable fenced play area for each five children. Adhering to this interpretation of the code we would require 11,000 s.f. of play space to accommodate all proposed 55 children of the child care center. The applicant is proposing to utilize a fenced in lawn area of 3,264 s.f. which falls short of the noted maximum by 7,736 square feet. We offer the following information and clarification for consideration as follows: • That applicant will not be bringing all 55 children outside at the same time. The applicant will be utilizing the outside space in class groups ranging 14 — 20 children at one time. This equates to requiring 2,800 s.f. to 4,000 s.f. of suitable area. • In addition to the proposed fenced area specifically for the children attending the facility; the applicant is proposing to utilize the existing adjacent park to augment activities as well. The applicant has been in discussion with the Village Administrator about the use of the adjacent parkland. The applicant has recently met with the Village Adminstrator to develop terms for a potential licensing agreement with the Village for use of the public park space. The current proposal would also include a 5% tuition discount for Village residents enrolled in the child care center. • Another consideration includes the makeup of the age groups of the children which will be: o (9) infants ages 6 weeks — 18 months o (12) toddlers ages 18 months — 3 yrs. o (34) preschoolers — ages 3 yrs — 5 yrs. The applicant's operation is intended to include infants. The infants will not be using the play area, but will be pushed in buggies by staff along the pathway at the existing adjacent park. The Village Code requires that the proposed play area be located not less than 30 feet from any lot line except where the rear or side yard lot line abuts a public park or parkway property and not less than 50' from any residential side yard. The applicant is proposing to utilize a fenced in lawn area and we offer the following information and clarification for consideration as follows: • The area designated for the play area abuts a public park with the closest lot line 25' away, which meets the Village Code • The applicant meets the requirement of minimum of 50' from any existing residence with the closest residential dwelling 67' away • In order to help mitigate any potential sound the proposed chain link fence will include vinyl strips. Comment No. 2 §250-6.H.(3)(e): The center shall not have more than 15 children in any case, except if the building is of fireproof or semi-fireproof construction as defined by the Building Code of the Village of Rye Brook. The existing shopping center buildings are not of fireproof or semi-fireproof construction. The standard for fireproof semi-fireproof construction set by this section of code is a hold-over from the old Town of Rye (ToR) Building Code adopted on 1215150, and in place when the shopping center was constructed. The terms "fireproof' and "semi-fireproof' are antiquated and not consistent with construction type classifications contained in the current NYSUFP&BC. Therefore, a comparison was made between the definitions of"fireproof' and "semi-fireproof' as contained in the ToR code. and the actual construction type classification of the existing shopping center buildings as defined by the 2015 international Building Code (IBC). It has been determined that the existing shopping center building construction as.defined by the IBC is Type 11 B, which is defined in Table 60 1 of the IBC as having no fire resistance rating on any structural members. This falls short of the requirements for fire resistance rated structural members set by the ToR Code for fireproof and for semi-fireproof construction. It should be noted that the existing shopping center buildings are fully protected with a code compliant fire suppression sprinkler system, the existence of which was not contemplated by the ToR Code. Response No. 2 As noted in your comment above, it appears that the Village's fire code is antiquated and not consistent with the construction type classifications. On October 29, 2018 Win Properties provided a certified letter from Jeffrey Taylor, RA, AIA confirming that the building construction, as defined and describe in Chapter 6, of the 2015/I13C Building Code of New York State, has a Type I I B, Non-Combustible Construction Classification. In addition, the building has an approved automatic sprinkler system with a monitored fire alarm system. See the attached letter for reference. We therefore believe that the fire code is being met in accordance with IBC Building Code of New York State. Comment No. 3 §250-6.H.(3)(0): The center shall have an off street drop-off/pickup area capable of storing the maximum number of vehicles simultaneously delivering and/or collecting children from the facility. The proposed location for the center is the Rye Ridge Plaza Building, which fronts on and is supported by the western-most parking lot located adjacent to the passive park. This is a shared lot and not exclusive to any single tenant, The applicant has not provided the information needed to determine if the existing Win Ridge shared parking lot at this location can support this requirement Response No. 3 All parents/caregivers must park and walk their children to and from the center; therefore, a drop-off/pick area to simultaneously deliver and/or collect children from the proposed facility does not align with how the childcare facility operates, nor will it be necessary. It is our client's experience that, in several instances, families have two children in the daycare and on any given day, some children could be out for sickness and/or vacation. The parent/caregiver drop-offs generally occur prior to 9:00 am, which is prior to when most of the medical office and retail spaces open. Generally, most pickups occur between 5:30 and 6:30 pm; which is after when most of the medical office spaces have closed for the day. In addition, the day care center is also closed on weekends, which would eliminate the parking demand for the proposed use on weekends. Based on recommended parking ratios as published in the "Dimensions of Parking 5`h Edition" by Urban Land Institute (ULI), the parking recommended for day care facilities is less than medical office use. ULI recommends a parking ratio of 4.5 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross foot area which equates to 21 spaces for the existing 4,464 square foot medical office use. ULI recommends a parking ratio of 0.3 parking spaces per child which equates to 17 spaces for the proposed day care facility accommodating 55 children. As shown, the proposed daycare has a reduction of 4 parking spaces compared to the existing medical office use. Thank you for your consideration. We look forward to working with the Planning Board and your office on this important application. If you have any further comments or questions, please feel free to contact our office directly at (914) 273-5225. Sincerely, JMC Planning Engineering Landscape Architecture & Land Surveying, PLLC W&� ucille Munz, RLA, ASLA Senior Landscape Architect Cc: Village of Rye Brook Chairman and the Planning Board Members pA2018\18124\admin\hcommentresponse 11-0b-2018.doac Site Planning Environmental Studies Civil Engineering Entitlements Landscape Architecture Construction Services Land Surveying 3D Visualization Transportation Engineering Laser Scanning August 30, 2018 RD E c EO Honorable Mayor Paul. S. Rosenberg 0 `'M Village Board of Trustees SEP -5 2018 Village of Rye Brook 838 King Street VILLAGE OF RyE BROOK Rye Brook, NY 10573 BUILDING DEPARTMENT RE: JMC Project 18124 Imagine Early Child Care Center— Special Use Permit 10 Rye Ridge Plaza— Suite 26 Bowman Avenue Village of Rye Brook, NY Dear Mayor Rosenberg and Board of Trustees: On behalf of Imagine Early Child Care Center, the potential tenant and Win Ridge Realty, LLC the property owner; we are pleased to submit the following; applications, forms and drawings in support of a Special Use Permit Application for your review and approval. Attached please find the following: o Special Use Permit Application, dated 8/30/18 o Site Plan Application, dated 8/30/18 o Site Plan Submittal Review Check List, dated 8130118 o Short Form EAF (Including NYSDEC Mapper Summary Report), dated 8130118 o JMC Drawings o C-I Cover Sheet, dated 8130118 o S-I Overall Existing Site Map, dated 8/30/18 o S-2 Site Plan, dated 8130/18 Proposed Project Overview: The applicant is requesting approval of the Special Use Permit for a 4,464 s.f. Child Care Center at the above noted address. The proposed Child Care Center is a permitted use in the existing medical office space at the Rye Ridge Plaza Shopping. In addition, to the request for special use permit, the applicant is requesting a consideration of a waiver for square footage requirements for outdoor play area. JMC Planning Engineering Landscape Architecture & Land Surveying, PLLC I JMC Site Development Consultants, LLC 120 BEDFORD ROAD I ARMONK, NY 10504 1 914.273.5225 1 MAIL@JMCPLLC.COM I JMCPLLC.COM The current 4,476 s.f. space at Suite 26 Rye Ridge Plaza was a Multi-Doctor Pediatric Group. The proposed permitted use is for a Child Care Center, which would accommodate a maximum of 55 children and 10 -12 staff. • The center will operate Monday- Friday 7 am — 6:30 pm. • The makeup of children is a as follows: o (9) infants ages 6 weeks — 18 months o (12) toddlers ages 18 months — 3 yrs. o (34) preschoolers — ages 3 yrs — 5 yrs. The Center has a no-drop off policy, which means that all parents/caregivers must walk children in and pick children up. Drop off times range from 7 am — 9:30 am and pick up times range from 4:00 pm — 6:30 pm. The Village Code requires that there must be at least 1,000 s.f. of suitable fenced play area for each five children; adhering to this code would require 11,000 s.f. of play space to accommodate all 55 children at one time. However; the Child Care Center's policy is that no more than 14-20 children will use the outdoor play area at any one time, which equates to a 2,800 s.f. — 4,000 s.f. of play area required. The applicant is proposing to utilize a fenced in lawn area of 3,264 s.f. which falls short of the maximum of 4,000 s.f. by 736 s.f. The applicant is requesting a waiver of the providing outdoor space for all 55 children, as the actual use will be 2,800 —4,000 s.f. maximum. In addition, the Village code also states that; day care centers "shall have an off-street dropoff/pickup area capable of storing the maximum number of vehicles simultaneously delivering and/or collecting children from the facility". As the center has a no-drop-off policy, all parents/caregivers must park and walk their children to and from the center; we therefore believe that adhering to this aspect of the code to provide a drop-off area to simultaneously deliver and/or collect children from the proposed facility does not align how the center will operate. Therefore; the applicant is also requesting a waiver from this requirement. We also believe that the traffic and parking generated from this potential change of use, will actually require less parking than the previous medical office space use overall. The staff of 10-12 will be parked on the property, at staggered times and the bulk of the parent/caregiver drop-offs generally happened prior to 9:00 am, which is prior to when most of the medical and retail spaced open. The pickup times range from 4:00 — 6:30 pm, with the bulk of pickups ranging from 5:30 — 6:30 pm; which is mostly after when most of the medical office space has closed for the day. The center is also closed on weekends, which also frees up any parking required. We trust that we have provided adequate information so that the Village Board of Trustees can decide with regard to the Special Use Permit and look forward for the Village Board approval, so that we may proceed with Planning Board and subsequent Building Department Approvals. In the interim, should the village have any questions, or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact us at (914) 273-5225. Sincerely, JMC Planning Engineering Landscape Architecture & Land Surveying, PLLC James Ryan, RLA Principal cc: Caryn O'Connor, Imagine Early Learning Center Jonathan Kallman Steven Silverberg, Esq. p:\2018\18124\odmin\opplicotions\boord of trustees_8-30-18.docx Site Planning Environmental Studies Civil Engineering Entitlements Landscape Architecture Construction Services Land Surveying 3D Visualization Transportation Engineering Laser Scanning January 22, 2019 Chairman Goodman and Members of the Planning Board Chairman Moscato and Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals Village of Rye Brook 938 King Street Rye Brook, NY 10573 RE: JMC Project 18124 Imagine Early Learning Center 10 Rye Ridge Plaza, Suite 26 Bowman Avenue Village of Rye Brook, NY Supplemental Response to Traffic & Parking Comments Dear Chairman Goodman, Chairman Moscato and respective Board Members: We have prepared this letter to supplement our previous letter dated 1/18/2019 in response to the traffic and parking review memorandum from Frederick P. Clark Associates, Inc. (FPCA) dated 12/27/2018. Based on comments from FPCA's memo,JMC requested and reviewed accident reports from the Village of Rye Brook Police Department for all the studied intersections and links between the studied intersections during a three year period from 01/15/2016 to 1/15/2019. The data from the accident reports have been provided in tabular format (Tables AR I thru AR5) and have been attached. At the intersection of Bowman Avenue and the school egress driveway with the lower plaza site driveway, there were three reported accidents during the three year period. There were two rear end accidents and one left turn accident. Following too closely was a contributing factor for 50% of the accidents and slippery pavement was a contributing factor for 33% of the accidents. There were no reported accidents along Bowman Avenue between the Port Chester School driveway intersections with Bowman Avenue. Two accidents were reported at the intersection of Bowman Avenue and the school ingress driveway with the upper plaza site driveway. Failure to yield the right-of-way is a contributing factor for one of the accidents while the other accident had a contributing factor of driver inattention. JMC Planning Engineering Landscape Architecture & Land Surveying, PLLC I JMC Site Development Consultants, LLC 120 BEDFORD ROAD ARMONK, NY 10504 914.273.5225 1 MAIL@JMCPLLC.COM I JMCPLLC.COM There were 20 reported accidents along Bowman Avenue between the school ingress driveway and South Ridge Street. The majority of the 20 reported accidents occurred at the intersection of the Bowman Avenue and the Rye Ridge Shopping center driveway so the accidents on this roadway segment are less; however, this intersection wasn't broken out for an intersection accident analysis since this intersection wasn't studied. There were 5 rear end accidents, I backing accident and 2 sideswipe accidents along this roadway segment when you exclude the turning accidents associated with the intersection of Bowman Avenue and the Rye Ridge Shopping center driveway. The 8 accidents represent an average of 2.7 accidents per year. Majority of the 8 accidents were related to driver distraction and following too closely. The backing accident is related to defective vehicle equipment. At the signalized intersection of Bowman Avenue & South Ridge Street, there were 31 reported accidents which represents an average of 10.3 accidents per year. The majority of the accidents were rear end accidents which are common among signalized intersections. 79% of the contributing factors of the reported accidents are driver error related. Our previous letter submission dated 01/18/2019 as well as this supplemental submission should satisfactorily address the comments mentioned in the FPCA's traffic and parking review memorandum dated 12/27/2018. Sincerely, JMC Planning Engineering Landscape Architecture & Land Surveying, PLLC Marc Petroro, PE, PTOE Senior Project Manager PA2018\18 1 2AADMIN*Goodman 01-22-2019.docx 2 TABLE AR1 INTERSECTION NAME: Bowman Avenue&Site Driveway A/School TOTAL ACCIDENTS: 3 Exit Driveway INTERSECTION NUMBER: 1 TIME PERIOD: 1/15/2016-1/15/2019 Day of Week Number % Accident Type Number % Sunday Rear End 2 67 Monday 1 33 Sideswipe Tuesday 1 33 Left Turn 1 33 Wednesday Right Turn Thursday Right Angle Friday Head On Saturday I 33 Bicyclist Time of Day Number % Pedestrian 6 am-10 am 1 33 Fixed Object 10 am-4 pm 2 67 Unknown 4 pm-7 pm Severitv Number % 7 pm-12 Mid Fatal Injury 12 Mid-6 am Non-Fatal Injury l 33 Weather Number % Property-Damage Only 2 67 Clear 1 33 Time of Year Number % Cloudy 1 33 Winter(Dec-Feb) 2 67 Fog Spring(Mar-May) Rain Summer(June-Aug) Sleet/Snow 1 33 Fall(Sep-Nov) 1 33 Pavement Number % Contributing Factors Number % Dry 1 33 Driver Inexperience Snow/Ice 1 33 Failure to Yield ROW Wet 1 33 Following Too Closely 1.50 50 Light Conditions Number % Traffic Control Disregard Day 3 100 Unsafe Speed Night Pavement Slippery 1.00 33 Dawn/Dusk Driver Inattention 0.50 17 Accident Rate Calculations Total Volume: 9,610 vehicles per day(AADT Source:JMC base counts) 3.51 Million Vehicles per Year 1.0 Average number of accidents per year 0.29 Accident Rate in accidents per Million Entering Vehicles(MEV) 0.24 NYSDOT Mean collision rate(Urban 4-leg signalized intersection) Specific Collisions Types Rear End 0.7 Average number of Rear End accidents per year 0.19 Accident Rate in Accidents per Million Entering Vehicles 0.11 NYSDOT Mean Accident Rate Left Turn 0.3 Average number of Left Turn accidents per year 0.10 Accident Rate in Accidents per Million Entering Vehicles 0.02 NYSDOT Mean Accident Rate P:\2018\18124\ADMIN\TRAFFIC\18124-Intersection Accidents 2019-01-22.xlsx;INT L1ab TABLE AR2 ROADWAY NAME: Bowman Avenue TOTAL ACCIDENTS: 0 BETWEEN: Site Driveway A(INT 1)&Site Driveway B(INT 2) SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.04 miles TIME PERIOD: 1/15/2016-1/15/2019 Day of Week 'Number % Accident Type Number % Sunday Rear End Monday Sideswipe Tuesday Left Turn Wednesday Right Turn Thursday Right Angle Friday Head On Saturday Bicyclist Time of Day Number % Severity Number % 6 am-10 am Fatal Injury 10 am4 pm Non-Fatal Injury 4 pm-7 pm Property-Damage Only 7pm-12Mid IimeofYear Number r 12 Mid-6 am Winter(Dec-Feb) Bather Number °/, Spring(Mar-May) Clear Summer(June-Aug) Cloudy Fall(Sep-Nov) Fog Contributing Factors Number Rain Driver Inexperience Sleet/Snow Failure to Yield ROW Pavement Number % Following Too Closely Dry Passing Too Closely Snow/Ice Traffic Control Disregard Wet Pavement Slippery Light Conditions Number %, Driver Inattention Day Brakes Defective Night Turning Improperly Dawn/Dusk Improper Lane Usage Accident Rate Calculations Total Volume: 9,050 vehicles per day(AADT Source:JMC base counts) 3.30 Million Vehicles per Year 0.0 Average number of accidents per year 0.00 Accident Rate in accidents per Million Vehicle Miles(MVM) 3.52 NYSDOT Mean collision rate(Urban Mainline&Juncture 2-Lanes Undivided) Specific Collisions Types Wet Pavement 0.0 Average number of Wet Pavement accidents per year 0.00 Accident Rate in Accidents per Million Vehicle Miles 0.57 NYSDOT Mean Accident Rate P:\2018\18124\ADMIN\TRAFFIC\181241ntersection Accidents_2019-01-22.xls:;Bowman Avenue(1-2).tab TABLE AR3 INTERSECTION NAME: Bowman Avenue&Site Driveway B/School TOTAL ACCIDENTS: 2 Entrance Driveway INTERSECTION NUMBER: 2 TIME PERIOD: 1/15/2016-1/15/2019 Day of Week Number % Accident Type Number % Sunday Rear End Monday Sideswipe Tuesday Left Turn 1 50 Wednesday Right Turn Thursday 1 50 Right Angle 1 50 Friday 1 50 Head On Saturday Bicyclist Time of Day Number % Pedestrian 6 am-10 am Fixed Object 10 am 4 pm 1 50 Unknown 4 pm-7 pm 1 50 Severity Number 7 pm-12 Mid Fatal Injury 12 Mid-6 am Non-Fatal Injury 2 100 Weather Number % Property-Damage Only Clear 1 50 Time of Year Number % Cloudy Winter(Dec-Feb) Fog Spring(Mar-May) Rain 1 50 Summer(June-Aug) Sleet/Snow Fall(Sep-Nov) 2 100 Pavement Number % Contributing Factors Number % Dry 1 50 Driver Inexperience Snow/Ice Failure to Yield ROW 1.00 50 Wet 1 50 Following Too Closely Li ht Conditions Number % Traffic Control Disregard Day 2 100 Unsafe Speed Night Pavement Slippery Dawn/Dusk Driver Inattention 1.00 50 Accident Rate Calculations Total Volume: 10,770 vehicles per day(AADT Source:JMC base counts) 3.93 Million Vehicles per Year 0.7 Average number of accidents per year 0.17 Accident Rate in accidents per Million Entering Vehicles(MEV) 0.24 NYSDOT Mean collision rate(Urban 4-leg signalized intersection) Specific Collisions Types Right Angle 0.3 Average number of Right Angle accidents per year 0.08 Accident Rate in Accidents per Million Entering Vehicles 0.07 NYSDOT Mean Accident Rate Left Turn 0.3 Average number of Left Turn accidents per year 0.08 Accident Rate in Accidents per Million Entering Vehicles 0.02 NYSDOT Mean Accident Rate Wet Pavement 0.3 Average number of Wet Pavement accidents per year 0.08 Accident Rate in Accidents per Million Entering Vehicles 0.04 NYSDOT Mean Accident Rate P:\20l8\18l24\ADMIN\TRAFFIC\18124-Intersection Accidents 2019-01-22.xlsx;INT 2.tab TABLE AR4 ROADWAY NAME: Bowman Avenue TOTAL ACCIDENTS: 20 BETWEEN: Site Driveway B(INT 2)&South Ridge Street(INT 3) SEGMENT LENGTH: 0.11 miles TIME PERIOD: 1/15/2016-1/15/2019 Day of Week Number % Accident Type Number % Sunday 1 5 Rear End 5 25 Monday 2 10 Sideswipe 2 10 Tuesday 5 25 Left Turn 8 40 Wednesday 2 10 Right Turn 4 20 Thursday 7 35 Right Angle Friday 3 15 Head On Saturday Backing 1 5 Time of Day Number % Severity Number % 6 am-10 am Fatal Injury 10 am-4 pm 14 70 Non-Fatal Injury 2 10 4 pm-7 pm 6 30 Property-Damage Only 18 90 7 pm-12 Mid Time of Year Number % 12 Mid-6 am Winter(Dec-Feb) 4 20 Weather Number % Spring(Mar-May) 4 20 Clear 9 45 Summer(June-Aug) 5 25 Cloudy 10 50 Fall(Sep-Nov 7 35 Fog Contributing Factors Number % Rain 1 5 Driver Inexperience 1.50 8 Sleet/Snow Failure to Yield ROW 7.00 35 Pavement Number % Following Too Closely 3.50 18 Dry 16 80 Passing Too Closely 1.00 5 Snow/Ice Traffic Control Disregard 0.50 3 Wet 4 20 Pavement Slippery 0.50 3 Light Conditions Number % Driver Inattention 2.50 13 Day 18 90 Brakes Defective 1.00 5 Night 2 10 Turning Improperly 2.00 10 Dawn/Dusk Improper Lane Usage 0.50 3 Accident Rate Calculations Total Volume: 9,050 vehicles per day(AADT Source:JMC base counts) 3.30 Million Vehicles per Year 6.7 Average number of accidents per year 17.76 Accident Rate in accidents per Million Vehicle Miles(MVM) 3.52 NYSDOT Mean collision rate(Urban Mainline&Juncture 2-Lanes Undivided) Specific Collisions Types Wet Pavement 1.3 Average number of Wet Pavement accidents per year 3.55 Accident Rate in Accidents per Million Vehicle Miles 0.57 NYSDOT Mean Accident Rate P:\2018\18124\ADMIN\TRAFFIC\18124-Intersection Aceiden1s_2019-01-22.x1sx;Bowman Avenue(2-3).tab TABLE ARS INTERSECTION NAME: Bowman Avenue&South Ridge Street TOTAL ACCIDENTS: 31 INTERSECTION NUMBER: 3 TIME PERIOD: 1/15/2016-1/15/2019 Day of Week Number % Accident Type Number % Sunday 1 3 Rear End 15 48 Monday 4 13 Sideswipe 5 16 Tuesday 7 23 Left Turn 6 19 Wednesday 4 13 Right Angle 3 10 Thursday 6 19 Pedestrian 1 3 Friday 6 19 Fixed Object 1 3 Saturday 3 10 Backing 1 3 Time of Day Number % Severity Number % 6 am-10 am 5 16 Fatal Injury 10 am-4 pm 13 42 Non-Fatal Injury 8 26 4 pm-7 pm 7 23 Property-Damage Only 23 74 7 pm-12 Mid 5 16 Time of Year Number % 12 Mid-6 am 1 3 Winter(Dec-Feb) 7 23 Weather Number % Spring(Mar-May) 8 26 Clear 17 55 Summer(June-Aug) 9 29 Cloudy 11 35 Fall(Sep-Nov) 7 23 Fog Contributing Factors Number % Rain 3 10 Driver Inexperience 1.00 3 Sleet/Snow Failure to Yield ROW 6.50 21 Pavement Number % Following Too Closely 6.00 19 Dry 25 81 Traffic Control Disregard 0.50 2 Snow/Ice 1 3 Pavement Slippery 1.00 3 Wet 5 16 View Obstructed 3.00 10 Light Conditions Number % Backing Unsafely 0.50 2 Day 23 74 Other Vehicular 0.50 2 Night 7 23 Unsafe Lane Change 1.50 5 Dawn/Dusk 1 3 Driver Inattention 7.50 24 Pavement Defective 0.50 2 Alcohol Involvement 0.50 2 Improper Lane Usage 1.00 3 Obstruction/Debris 1.00 3 Accident Rate Calculations Total Volume: 19,370 vehicles per day(AADT Source:JMC base counts) 7.07 Million Vehicles per Year 10.3 Average number of accidents per year 1.46 Accident Rate in accidents per Million Entering Vehicles(MEV) 0.24 NYSDOT Mean collision rate(Urban 4-leg signalized intersection) Specific Collisions Types Rear End 5.0 Average number of Rear End accidents per year 0.71 Accident Rate in Accidents per Million Entering Vehicles 0.11 NYSDOT Mean Accident Rate Left Turn 2.0 Average number of Left Turn accidents per year 0.28 Accident Rate in Accidents per Million Entering Vehicles 0.02 NYSDOT Mean Accident Rate Sideswipe 1.7 Average number of Sideswipe accidents per year 0.24 Accident Rate in Accidents per Million Entering Vehicles 0.00 NYSDOT Mean Accident Rate P:\2018\I8124\ADMMTRAFFIC\18124-Intersection Accidents_2019-01-22.x1sx;INT 3.tab Site Planning Environmental Studies Civil Engineering Entitlements Landscape Architecture Construction Services Land Surveying 3D Visualization Transportation Engineering Laser Scanning January 18, 2019 Mr. Michal J. Nowak Superintendent of Public Works Village of Rye Brook 938 King Street JAN 18 2019 Rye Brook, NY 10573 RE: Application No. 18-026 JMC Project 18124 Imagine Early Learning Centers 10 Rye Ridge Plaza — Suite 26 Village of Rye Brook, NY Dear Mr. Nowak, On behalf of our client Caryn O'Connor, we are respectfully requesting relief from providing topographic survey information for the above noted application as is required in accordance with Town Code, as the survey data is still being compiled. We have provided spot grade information on the path area that is pertinent to the project on the updated Zoning Appeals Compliance Drawings dated 01/18/2019. Respectfully, JMC Planning Engineering Landscape Architecture & Land Surveying, PLLC Alffyj IS )W� - Lucille S. Munz, RLA Senior Landscape Architect p:\2018\18124\odmin\hnowok 01-18-2019.docx JMC Planning Engineering Landscape Architecture & Land Surveying, PLLC ' JMC Site Development Consultants, LLC 120 BEDFORD ROAD i ARMONK, NY 10504 914.273.5225 MAIL@JMCPLLC.COM JMCPLLC.COM Site Planning Environmental Studies Civil Engineering Entitlements Landscape Architecture Construction Services Land Surveying 3D Visualization Transportation Engineering Laser Scanning January 18, 2019 Chairman Goodman and Members of the Planning Board Chairman Moscato and Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals 938 King Street t Rye Brook, NY 10573 JAN 18 2019 RE: JMC Project 18124 Imagine Early Learning Center 10 Rye Ridge Plaza, Suite 26 Bowman Avenue Village of Rye Brook, NY Response to Planning Comments Dear Chairman Goodman, Chairman Moscato and respective Board Members: This letter is in response to Ms. Marilyn Tim pone-Mohamed, RLC, AICP Senior Associate for F.P. Clark Associate Inc., memo dated December 26, 2018 and my subsequent phone discussion with Ms. Tim pone-Mohamed, on behalf of our client, Caryn O'Connor, Vice President and Executive Director of Imagine Early Learning Centers. In comment no. 3 of Ms. Tim pone-Mohamed's memo, and per our subsequent phone conversations, she requested a detailed narrative describing the operation of the child care facility, including building circulation and playground access. Below we offer the following information and clarification as requested: A. Operating Hours: • Drop off 7-9:30 am • Pick up 4- 6:30 pm • Families arrive on a staggered basis for drop off and pickup range. In the client's experience they do not have all 55 children arriving at once. In fact, there are very infrequently 2 families arriving simultaneously. Once every 2 minutes or so is more in line how the drop off and pickups work • The Center does not have 1/2 day schedules nor does it have drop-in "temporary" child care JMC Planning Engineering Landscape Architecture & Land Surveying, PLLC JMC Site Development Consultants, LLC 120 BEDFORD ROAD ARMONK, NY 10504 914.273.5225 MAIL@JMCPLLC.COM JMCPLLC.COM B. Number of children (55) and makeup is as follows: • (9) Infants ages 6weeks — 18 months • (12) Toddlers ages 18 months — 3 yrs. • (34) Preschoolers ages 3 yrs. — 5 yrs. • (10-12) staff in accordance with NY State Licensing guidelines C. Number of children using outdoor play activity: Children play outside in shifts of (17) children per class maximum. Each group of children will go out once in the am between 10 and 12 and once is the afternoon between 3:00 and 5:30. Children will be escorted in pairs holding hands (3-5-year old's) or holding on to a waking loop (18-36 months) across a crosswalk with one staff member in front of the line and one at the end of the line with another staff member holding up a sign to stop traffic. Class shifts are for 30-40 minutes weather permitting. Two hours will accommodate 4 groups to go out for a half hour each in am and pm. Children do not go out in inclement weather and conduct gross motor activities inside. If there is snow in the playground children may go out for shorter periods if parents comply with requests to send children in snow gear. Children will access the proposed playground through the trail as noted on the updated site plans. Some fencing improvements have been made and the proposed plans note for additional improvements to the trail including new fencing, handrails, and mulch trail improvements. Please see ZC-3 Enlargement Plan dated 1-18-19. D. Site Plan and proposed interior space plan: An updated plan has been provided as well as an architectural floor plan, see ZC-4 noting building access location. Photos of existing conditions have also been added to the zoning compliance plans on ZC-4 dated 1-18-19. E. Building Access and Parking: The interior space plan was submitted to the building department in June of 2018. Please note on sheet ZC-4 of the updated Zoning Compliance Drawings, illustrating the interior building floor plan, that the main "private" entrance to the child care facility is marked as location "B". The other doors "C", "D" and "E" are fire egress doors into the hallways. And "A" is the main hallway entrance for all the suites. Per my conversation with Ms. Timpone-Mohamed, she questioned whether families could access the facility from the upper lot and therefore potentially impact the parking and traffic above. While there is interior access to the proposed child care center from the upper lot; we believe that most, if not all the families will access the main "private" entrance from the lower level. We believe that once the attached floor plan is viewed by the various boards and staff, that everyone will concur that there is no advantage in utilizing the access from the upper lot, and therefore potentially impacting parking and traffic at the upper lot is not an issue. F. Playground Access & play equipment: As noted on our updated plans ZC-2 and ZC-3 dated 1-18-19, the plans indicate a red dashed line noting the proposed walking path from the child care center door to the proposed outdoor play area. The plan proposes to install a newly painted cross walk and crossing stop bar. There are currently (2) stop signs in place. In addition to the painted crosswalk and cross bar our plans propose that: • a pedestrian yield sign be placed in the crosswalk, which is consistent with the pedestrian yield signs throughout the entire shopping plaza. • The large shrubs against the building be removed and replaced with lower growing shrubs. • After crossing the driveway, the children will access the proposed playground area via the Village's existing woodland trail. There is new fencing along the trail, and our plan includes additional fencing and railing as necessary. • The path is currently woodchips with the addition of gravel/wood chips and potential pavement at the lower portion of the trail as necessary. • There is no permeant play equipment planned for the play area, and any play equipment shall be stored in the proposed shed. We trust that the additional information presented herein, along with the updated Zoning Compliance Plans, provides satisfactory information that the proposed special use for a Child Care Facility will not have a significant impact and is an appropriate use for the space. Sincerely, JMC Planning Engineering Landscape Architecture & Land Surveying, PLLC Awai S �7 Lucille S. Munz, RLA Senior Landscape Architect Cc: Ms. Caryn O'Connor, Image Early Learning Center Steven Silverberg, Esq., Silverberg Zalantis LLP Mr. Craig Sampson, Win Ridge Realty LLC Mr. Michael Izo, Building Inspector Mr. Michael Nowak, Village Engineer pA2018\18124\adminVtgoodman 01-18-19_Ivm.docx Site Planning Environmental Studies Civil Engineering Entitlements Landscape Architecture Construction Services Land Surveying 3D Visualization Transportation Engineering Laser Scanning January 18, 2019 Chairman Goodman and Members of the Planning Board y Chairman Moscato and Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals BAN 18 2019 Village of Rye Brook 938 King Street Rye Brook, NY 10573 RE: JMC Project 18124 Imagine Early Learning Center 10 Rye Ridge Plaza, Suite 26 Bowman Avenue Village of Rye Brook, NY Response to Traffic & Parking Comments Dear Chairman Goodman, Chairman Moscato and respective Board Members: We have prepared this letter and attachments in response to the traffic and parking review memorandum from Frederick P. Clark Associates, Inc. (FPCA) dated 12/27/2018. The Imagine Early Learning Center proposes to occupy a currently vacant tenant space (Suite #26) located in the Rye Ridge Plaza. Suite #26 is 4,464 square feet which was previously occupied by a medical office use. The suite has been vacant since July 31, 2018. The main access to the suite is provided by a door to the lower parking level and the suite can also be accessed via stairs and hallway to the upper parking area of the plaza. To provide some history on the property, our office worked with the shopping center and the Village Board of Trustees for a site plan amendment. As part of the amendment, we worked with the Village and the Village's consultants to provide traffic studies, parking studies, and pedestrian information relating to conversion of existing gross floor area of the property to restaurant use or other equivalent use. The resolution was adopted by the Village on 09/23/2014 which allows the "conversion of up to an additional 13,950 square feet of the Shopping Center's existing gross floor area, beyond that currently existing, to restaurant or other equivalent use" without additional site plan review. This resolution was for the property located at 100-150 South Ridge Street, 1-34 Rye Ridge Plaza and 158-204 South Ridge Street to provide the property owner with flexibility to obtain tenants for their center without requiring each tenant to undergo a site plan review with the Village Boards. JMC Planning Engineering Landscape Architecture & Land Surveying, PLLC j JMC Site Development Consultants, LLC 120 BEDFORD ROAD I ARMONK, NY 10504 1914.273.5225 1 MAIL@JMCPLLC.COM I JMCPLLC.COM Traffic In response to FPCA's review memo, we prepared a traffic analysis to assess the traffic impacts of the proposed day care center on the area roadways. A. Existing Conditions The main access to the suite is provided via the lower plaza driveway connecting to Bowman Avenue. The site driveway provides one ingress and one egress lane. Bowman Avenue at the site driveway provides one travel lane in each direction with shared turns into the property. Opposite the site driveway is the Port Chester Middle School egress driveway which provides a separate left turn lane and a shared thru/right turn lane. The upper plaza site driveway intersects Bowman Avenue at a four-legged unsignalized intersection. The upper plaza site driveway provides a single approach lane with shared turning movements. Bowman Avenue provides one travel lane in each direction with shared turns into the property. The fourth leg serves as the Port Chester Middle School entrance only driveway. The four-legged intersection of South Ridge Street & Bowman Avenue operates under signalized control. The northbound and southbound approaches along South Ridge Street provide two travel lanes for shared left/thru and shared thru/right turning movements. The eastbound approach along Bowman Avenue provides a separate left turn lane and a shared thru/right lane. The westbound approach provides a separate left turn lane and a shared thru/right lane. In order to assess existing traffic conditions in the vicinity of the site, traffic counts were conducted at the Bowman Avenue and Rye Ridge Plaza lower parking lot driveway with the Port Chester Middle School egress driveway intersection as well as at Bowman Avenue and Rye Ridge Plaza upper parking lot driveway with the Port Chester Middle School ingress driveway intersection. The two intersections were counted on Wednesday,January 16, 2019 from 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM as well as from 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM. The peak weekday AM hour occurred between 7:30 AM and 8:30 AM. The peak weekday PM hour occurred between 4:45 PM and 5:45 PM. The 2017 existing traffic volumes from the 90 South Ridge Street Parking Lot Expansion Traffic Study, revised 03/07/2017, during the peak weekday morning and afternoon hours were utilized for the intersection of Bowman Avenue and South Ridge Street in our analysis. The 2017 existing peak hour volumes at the intersection of Bowman Avenue and South Ridge Street were increased by a general growth rate of 1.0 per year compounded annually to 2019. The 2019 peak hour volumes were balanced between the studied intersections, where applicable. The peak hour 2019 base volumes are shown on the attached Figures I and 2. Intersection capacity analyses were computed for the existing intersections utilizing Synchro software developed based on the methodologies of the Highway Capacity Manual, 6`h Edition. Vehicular delays are identified as levels of service, which represent a range of average seconds delay per vehicle, with Level of Service A (less than or equal to 10 seconds) representing the shortest delays and level of service F being the longest delays (greater than 80 seconds for 2 signalized intersections and greater than 50 seconds for unsignalized intersections). The intersection capacity analyses are shown on Tables 2 and 3. The analyses indicate that the Port Chester Middle School driveway left turn onto Bowman Avenue operates at a level of service F during the peak weekday AM hour. The plaza's lower parking area driveway operates at a level of service D and the plaza's upper parking area driveway operates at a level of service F. The overall intersection of Bowman Avenue and South Ridge Street operates a level of service D. All other movements at the studied intersection operate at a level of service D or better during the peak weekday AM hour. During the peak weekday PM hour, overall intersection of Bowman Avenue and South Ridge Street operates a level of service D. The Bowman Avenue eastbound thru/right lane at its intersection with South Ridge Street operates at a level of service E. All other movements at the studied intersection operate at a level of service D or better during the peak weekday PM hour. JMC requested accident reports from the Village of Rye Brook Police Department for all studied intersections and links within the study area for the latest three year period. An accident analysis of the reports will be provided in a supplemental submission. B. No-Build Conditions The existing volumes were increased by a general growth rate of 1.0 percent per year compounded annually to the 2020 design year for completion and occupancy of the proposed day care center. This analysis incorporates traffic volumes associated with the proposed parking lot expansion at 90 South Ridge Street from their traffic study; however, these volumes were only applied to the South Ridge Street and Bowman Avenue intersection since the traffic counts utilized in this analysis at this specific intersection were conducted prior to the completion of 90 South Ridge Street development. Traffic volumes associated with the Bowridge Commons and the Points at Rye Brook developments are minimal within the study area and have been included in the general growth volumes. Our analysis also includes the reoccupancy of the vacant 4,464 S.F. tenant space to its former medical office use. The traffic volumes associated with the reoccupancy of the medical office use are depicted on Table I which is based on information published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers in its publication "Trip Generation Manual, 10`h Edition". The other development volumes and reoccupancy volumes were added to the general growth volumes to project the 2020 No Build Volumes. The capacity analyses indicate that all turning movements at the studied intersections under the no-build conditions are projected to operate at the same levels of service as experienced under existing conditions during the peak weekday AM and PM hours. 3 C. Build Conditions Traffic volumes generated by the proposed day care are based on information published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers in its publication "Trip Generation Manual, 10`h Edition". Table I shows the traffic volumes related to the reoccupied medical office, proposed day care and the net additional volumes. As shown on Table 1, the proposed day care is projected to generate 31 and 28 net additional trips during the peak weekday AM and PM hours, respectively, compared to the reoccupancy of the medical office use. The projected net additional traffic was superimposed on the studied intersections based on traffic volume data and consideration of the area roadways. Figures showing the net additional traffic and intersection capacity analyses are attached. As shown on Tables 2 and 3, the turning movements at the studied intersections with the proposed day care center will operate at the same levels of service as projected for the no- build condition during both studied peak hours. Parking In response to FPCA's review memo, we prepared a parking analysis to review the parking for the proposed day care center. Based on the Village's Zoning Code Chapter 250-6.10, medical and dental offices require one parking space for every 150 square feet of gross floor area. The previous 4,464 square foot medical office use required 30 parking spaces based on the Zoning Code. The Village's Zoning Code does not provide a specific parking requirement for a day care use. We reviewed the two different parking publications. The first publication is "The Dimensions of Parking, 5th Edition" by the Urban Land Institute (ULI) which provides recommended parking ratios based on various land uses. For medical offices, ULI recommends 4.5 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet which results in 21 parking spaces for the prior 4,464 square foot medical office. For a daycare center, ULI recommends 0.3 parking spaces per student which results in 17 parking spaces for the proposed 55 student day care center. Based on ULI, the daycare center represents a reduction of 4 parking spaces compared to the prior medical office use. The second publication is the "Parking Generation, 4Ch Edition" by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) which provides the parking demand for various land uses. For medical offices, ITE states that the 85`h percentile parking demand is 4.27 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet which results in 20 parking spaces for the prior 4,464 square foot medical office. For a daycare center, ITE states that the 85`h percentile parking demand is 0.33 parking spaces per student which results in 19 parking spaces for the proposed 55 student day care center. Based on ITE, the daycare center represents a reduction of I parking space compared to the prior medical office use. The two parking publications recognize that the parking required for a day care center of 55 students is less than a 4,464 square foot medical office use. The other important parking item to note is that medical office use could be open on weekends to accommodate their patients while this day care center would be closed on the weekends. So there 4 would be a reduction in the parking demand on weekends for the day care center compared to the medical office use. In addition to our review of the Village's Zoning Code and parking publications, we conducted a parking count in the vicinity of the proposed day care center. The parking count was conducted on Wednesday, January 16, 2019 at 8:00 AM and 5:30 PM to represent time periods where children will be dropped off and picked up from the child care center, respectively. The parking count study area is outlined and shown on the attached Figure P-1. The parking count study area is within 300 feet of the two entries to the Rye Ridge Plaza to access the proposed day care center. The attached Table P-I depicts the parking supply within the study area for the lower parking area and upper parking area. The study area has a parking supply of 76 parking spaces on the lower parking area and 197 parking spaces on the upper parking area. Table P-I also provides the number of vacant parking spaces during our counts for the two parking areas. As shown in the table, there were a total of 215 vacant parking spaces during the weekday morning count with 57 vacant spaces on the lower parking area and 158 vacant spaces on the upper parking area. During the weekday afternoon count, there were a total of 133 vacant parking spaces within the study area with 63 vacant spaces on the lower parking area and 70 vacant spaces on the upper parking area. The parking supply and counts mentioned above do not incorporate the 64 additional parking spaces which were recently constructed for the adjacent dog park. At the time of the parking counts, these additional parking spaces were not available for vehicles to utilize. When these parking spaces become available, there will be additional parking available for the day care center to utilize. Based on our parking counts, there is ample available parking to accommodate the parking demand for the day care center as mentioned in the ULI and ITE publications. Additionally, there will be even more available parking with the recently completed 64 additional parking spaces near the dog park. Sincerely, JMC P nn' Engineering Landscape Architecture & Land Surveying, PLLC Marc Petroro, PE, PTOE Senior Project Manager PA2018\18124\ADMIN\hGoodman 01-18-2019.docx 5 TABLE 1 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT VOLUMES(') PEAK WEEKDAY PEAK WEEKDAY DESCRIPTION AM HOUR(4) PM HOUR(') ENTER EXIT TOTAL ENTER EXIT TOTAL A.Reoccupied 4,464 S.F.Medical Office Driveway Volumes 9 3 12 4 11 1 S (ITE Code 254f) B.Proposed 55 Student Day Care Facility Driveway Volumes 23 20 43 20 23 43 (ITE Code 254)(3) C.Net Additional Driveway Volumes 14 17 31 16 12 28 (Row C=Row B-Row A) Notes: (1)Trip Generation based on ITE(Institute of Transportation Engineers)Trip Generation Manual, loth Edition. (2)Medical-Dental Office(ITE Code 720)is defined by ITE as facility that provides diagnoses and outpatient care on a routine basis but is unable to provide prolonged in-house medical and surgical care. (3)Day Care Center(ITE Code 565)is defined by ITE as facility where care for pre-school age children is provided,normally during daytime hours. I P:\2018\18124\ADMIN\TRAFFIC\18124-Dev Vol Table 2019-01-18.xlsx TABLE 2 INTERSECTION OPERA TIONS-PEAK WEEKDA YAM HOUR INTERSECTION APPROACH LANE GROUP 2019 BASE 2020 NO BUILD 2020 BUILD V/Co) DELAY(2) LOS(3) V/Co, DELAY(2) LOSP) V/C(t) DELAY(2) LOSP) 1. Bowman Avenue& EASTBOUND Site Driveway A/ (Bowan Avenue) THRU/RIGHT m School Exit Driveway WESTBOUND (Unsignalized) (Bowman Avenue) LEFT/THRU 0.01 8.9 A 0.02 9.0 A 0.02 9.0 A NORTHBOUND LEFT/RIGHT 0.15 27.2 D 0.17 28.3 D 0.24 29.3 D (Site Driveway A) SOUTHBOUND LEFT 0.94 84.8 F 0.99 97.9 F 1.04 114.8 F (School Exit Dwy) THRU/RIGHT 0.33 19.1 C 0.34 19.9 C 0.35 20.4 C 2.Bowman Avenue& EASTBOUND / LEFT/rHRU/RIGHT 0.20 10.3 B 0.20 10.4 B 0.21 10.5 B Site Driveway B (Bowman Avenue) School Entrance WESTBOUND Driveway (Bowman Avenue) LEFT/rHRU/RIGHT 0.04 9.1 A 0.04 9.2 A 0.04 9.2 A (Unsignalized) NORTHBOUND LEFT/THRU/RIGHT 0.63 61.0 F 0.66 67.8 F 0.67 67.5 F (Site Driveway B) 3.South Ridge Street& LEFT 0.59 39.4 D 0.61 40.5 D 0.63 41.7 D Bowman Avenue EASTBOUND THRU/RIGHT 0.68 51.4 D 0.69 51.8 D 0.70 52.2 D (Signalized) (Bowman Avenue) COMPOSITE - 47.3 D - 47.9 D - 48.5 D LEFT 0.54 36.0 D 0.54 36.3 D 0.55 36.5 D WESTBOUND(Bowman Avenue) THRU/RIGHT 0.67 49.9 D 0.68 50.7 D 0.69 50.9 D COMPOSITE 45.1 D 45.8 D 46.0 D NORTHBOUND LEFTITHRU/RIGHT 0.74 38.5 D 0.76 39.4 D 0.76 39.5 D (South Ridge Street) SOUTHBOUND LEFT/rHRU/RIGHT 0.72 49.0 D 0.73 49.7 D 0.74 50.0 D (South Ridge Street) INTERSECTION COMPOSITE 44.6 D 45.3 D 45.7 D Notes: (1)V/C represents volume/capacity ratio (2)Delay is average seconds delay per vehicle (3)LOS represents level of service P:\2018\18124\ADMIN\TRAFFIC\18124-INT Operation Table_2019-01-18.xlsx;AM.tab TABLE 3 INTERSECTION OPERA TIONS-PEAK WEEKDAY PM HOUR INTERSECTION APPROACH LANE GROUP 2019 BASE 2020 NO BUILD 2020 BUILD V/Cm DELAY(2) LOS(i) V/Co) DELAY(2) LOScn V/Co) DELAY(2) LOSm 1. Bowman Avenue& EASTBOUND THRU/RIGHT Site Driveway A/ (Bowman Avenue) School Exit Driveway WESTBOUND (Unsignalized) (Bowman Avenue) LEFT/THRU 0.00 8.7 A 0.00 8.7 A 0.01 8.8 A NORTHBOUND LEFT/RIGHT 0.14 18.7 C 0.16 19.2 C 0.19 19.8 C (Site Driveway A) SOUTHBOUND LEFT 0.08 21.2 C 0.08 2L7 C 0.08 22.4 C (School Exit Dwy) THRU/RIGHT 0.10 10.1 B 0.01 10.1 B 0.01 10.1 B 2.Bowman Avenue& EASTBOUND Site Driveway B/ (Bowman Avenue) LEFT/THRU/RIGHT 0.01 7.9 A 0.01 7.9 A 0.01 7.9 4 School Entrance WESTBOUND LEFT/rHRU/RIGHT 0.07 9.0 A 0.07 9.0 A 0.07 9.0 A Driveway (Bowman Avenue) (Unsignalized) NORTHBOUND LEFT/rHRU/RIGHT 0.46 23.1 C 0.48 24.] C 0.49 24.7 C (Site Driveway B) 3.South Ridge Street& LEFT 0.39 25.0 C 0.40 25.3 C 0.41 25.4 C Bowman Avenue EASTBOUND THRU/RIGHT 0.93 65.5 E 0.93 65.1 E 0.93 66.2 E (Signalized) (Bowman Avenue) COMPOSITE - 54.1 D - 53.6 D - 54.4 D LEFT 0.68 37.4 D 0.68 37.5 D 0.69 38.0 D WESTBOUND(Bowman Avenue) THRU/RIGHT 0.34 34.0 C 0.34 34.0 C 0.35 34.1 C COMPOSITE - 35.7 D - 35.8 D 36.0 D NORTHBOUND LEFT/THRU/RIGHT 0.65 28.0 C 0.69 29.0 C 0.69 29.1 C (South Ridge Street) SOUTHBOUND LEFT/THRU/RIGHT 0.54 36.8 D 0.64 39.3 D 0.65 39.5 D (South Ridge Street) INTERSECTION COMPOSITE - 38.8 D 39.4 D - 39.8 D Notes: (1)V/C represents volume/capacity ratio (2)Delay is average seconds delay per vehicle (3)LOS represents level of service P:\2018\18124\ADMIN\TRAFFIC\18124-INT Operation Table_2019-01-18.xlsx;PM.tab � oow f--•172 � 4-162 sN rA43 � � y� r7r-24 rn��1 123 '€ BOMA/AN At£ BOWAN At£ 4 6 NJ AY£ 456-*- 1 �h 38- ; � 448--*- � 61 1 �.��U0'bEllAYA 2 &ST ,rB SWN,l�snaa-r /m/01AC Q7T am wAY /SOYOUL ENIRANCF DAM MAY O &BONMW A W M.E PF 1t, of... 'd - _ .`�•' � ��' 1 _ ';a� MAW- w r.,. 1 � t IS9 � 444 ' 9t 17 ti tti v \ .rlj i PROPOSED IMAGINE EARLY LEARNING CENTER 120 6EDFORDRD RYE RIDGE SHOPPING CENTER RYE RIDGE PLAZA VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK, NY BEDFOR ARMONK NY 105N 2019 BASE VOLUMES (914)273.5225 PEAK WEEKDAY AM HOUR fax 273-2102 DATE:01/18/2019 JMC PROJECT: 18124 JMCPLLC.COM FIGURE:01 SCALE: 1"=200' COPYRIGHT 0 2019 by JMC AN Rights Reserved.No part of this document maybe reproduced,stored in a retdeval system,or transmitted in any form or by means,electronic,mechanical,photocopying,recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of JMC PLANNING,ENGINEERING,LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE&LAND SURVEYING,PLLC I JMC SITE DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS,LLC I JOHN MEYER CONSULTING,INC.(JMC).Any modifications or alterations to this document without the written permission of JMC shah render them invalid and unusable. 18124-TRAFFIC-F/C.dwg,• TRAFFIC-FIGS.fob L50 L19 �Z2 09 f-2330 C; ~159 r-63 1 AN A if BOWAN A K 4 B AN A 4£ 544-� ��39 �� Ln 47�� � o 95-3 m 219Z o d S✓7F Ll'B'6EWi1 Y A 2 d SJ'lE LYBM1f1G1Y B � SY.Y/IH 2f7Cf"S7A9T /mhm Dar aw AY /sam EWI UNLY Q41'ww Y O d 801MLUV AW%W r , • , x BoWMpN •ram- r >, ,� n i e � ► N� Zo I-41 T PROPOSED IMAGINE EARLY LEARNING CENTER RYE RIDGE SHOPPING CENTER RYE RIDGE PLAZA VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK,NY 1208EDFORD RD ARMONK NY 10504 2019 BASE VOLUMES (914)273-5225 PEAK WEEKDAY PM HOUR fax 273-2102 DATE:01/18/2019 JMC PROJECT:18124 JMCPLLC.COM FIGURE:02 SCALE:1"=200' COPYRIGHT©2019 by JMC AN Rights Reserved.No part of this document maybe reproduced,stored in a retrieval system,or transmitted in any form or by means,electronic,mechanical,photocopying,recording or otherwise, without the pdor written permission of JMC PLANNING,ENGINEERING,LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE&LAND SURVEYING,PLLC I JMC SITE DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS,LLC I JOHN MEYER CONSULTING,INC.(JMC).Any modifications or alterabons to this document without the written permission of JMC shall render them invalid and unusable. 18124-TRAFFIC-F/G dw9,- TRAFF/C-IC tab � C453 � - —174 -4--164 r', r144 o�cn 7 24 CP � A�AW BOMAIAN Al£ �461� � "Mr38 �wo v � �► w cA 1a2� y NN BOWAW A111M/E 80 A W AWMW 1 &NE WWWA r A 2 a 97E aar"A r 8 O shun:!MOLTsnag Isom Enr my"Ar /sOYM DVAIM E OWWWA r &BVNMW A 6E1Y1',E' ,7 _ . nr A, �. Yt > �NUE ,1* MAN A 4 _ 1! 4X4itti ll 1`�y SITE Ilk o. n PROPOSED IMAGINE EARLY LEARNING CENTER DRD RYE RIDGE SHOPPING CENTER RYE RIDGE PLAZA VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK,NY 120 BEDFOR BEDFOR ARMONK NY 10504 2020 GENERAL GROWTH VOLUMES (914)2735225 PEAK WEEKDAY AM HOUR fax 273-2102 DATE:01/18/2019 JMC PROJECT:18124 JMCPLLC.COM FIGURE:03 SCALE: 1-=200' COPYRIGHT 02019 by J MC AN Rights Reserved.No part of this document maybe reproduced,stored in a retrieval system,or transmitted in any form or by means,electronic,mechanical,photocopying,recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of JMC PLANNING,ENGINEERING,LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE&LAND SURVEYING,PL-C I JMC SITE DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS,LLC I JOHN MEYER CONSULTING,INC.(JMC).Any modifications or alterations to this document without the written permission of JMC shall render them invalid and unusable. 18124-TRAFFIC-FIG dwg,• TRAFFIC-F/CS.fob t-51 L19 — Co o 00 �-312 4 f-235 0 r141 1 2 64 • 41 AN Al£ AN A l£ 1..' �jtNAN AE 550--► 10-5 "M (♦ 39—� o N 477--► o �,cn�, 185� o C "' 96--;, N Ln ow BOW4N A W M/£ BOWAN A W MBE 1 d'.97F Dff "WAY A 2 &WE GYd WWAY B � SOM Mr SM7 /Sia910LL' sur A4r'"A Y /Si Y= MRANIX Li0' )VA Y d BOWW A W M.E v -x, a sir�_`y w. ' '' � .�'' �g0 MAN pVENV . 9 1 xi o ITE is . .. , 7. PROPOSED IMAGINE EARLY LEARNING CENTER 1208EDFORDRD RYE RIDGE SHOPPING CENTER RYE RIDGE PLAZA VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK, NY ARMONK NY 10504 2020 GENERAL GROWTH VOLUMES (914)273.5225 PEAK WEEKDAY PM HOUR fax 273-2102 DATE:01/18/2019 JMC PROJECT:18124 JMCPLLC.COM FIGURE:04 SCALE:1"=200' COPYRI GHT©2019 by JMC AN Rights Reserved.No part of this document maybe reproduced,stored in a retrieval system,or transmitted in any form or by means,electronic,mechanical,photocopying,recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of JMC PLANNING,ENGINEERING,LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE&LAND SURVEYING,PLLC)JMC SITE DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS,LLC I JOHN MEYER CONSULTING,INC.(JMC).Any modifications or alterations to this document without the written permission of JMC shall render them invalid and unusable. 18124-TRAFFIC-RG.dw9,• TRAFFIC-FIGS.t ob t- a)o to/o 4 A r4/1 41 IF 0 1` All 60WAN A IfBO AN A if '7 BOWAN AWME BOWAN A WRW 1 &vx L11B'"r A 2 d sf7r awttw r B O �OWAN A SS LEGEND: PEAK WEEKDAY AM HOUR / PEAK WEEKDAY PM HOUR -low �V I N't Y.. Ow B MMilim pN . 2 3l _- ! ig " ICE .. t � p PROPOSED IMAGINE EARLY LEARNING CENTER 120BEDFORDRD RYE RIDGE SHOPPING CENTER RYE RIDGE PLAZA VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK,NY ARMONK NY 10504 OTHER DEVELOPMENT VOLUMES (914)273-5225 90 SOUTH RIDGE STREET fax 273-2102 DATE:01/18/2019 JMC PROJECT: 18124 JMCPLLC.COM FIGURE:05 SCALE: COPYRIGHT 0 2019 by JMC All Rights Reserved.No part of this document maybe reproduced,stored in a retrieval system,or transmitted in any form or by means,electronic,mechanical,photocopying,recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of JMC PLANNING,ENGINEERING,LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE&LAND SURVEYING,PLLC I JMC SITE DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS,LLC I JOHN MEYER CONSULTING,INC.(JMC).Any modifications or alterations to this document without the written permission of JMC shall render them invalid and unusable. 18124-TRAFF/C-F/G.dwg," / F/C-F/CS.tob LEGEND �AN Al£ � �AN Al•£ � � �AVE ENTERING % EXITING �Q41 Z5 Z m 5 Z BOW O 1 97E N A bOM� -77FM/A►�EM3l��g�aa"r A 2 a s�aanM r B 3 slavn:'AVIX snaffr /si soraii�r / DVnMKX aP/"r &BOMIM A1EIM .ate -01 tt e s 2 y ,a #,i t R r M a • SITE ) 14 �e • i v PROPOSED IMAGINE EARLY LEARNING CENTER 120BEDFORDRD RYE RIDGE SHOPPING CENTER RYE RIDGE PLAZA VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK,NY ARMONK NY 10504 REOCCUPIED TRIP DISTRIBUTIONS (914)273-5225 fax 273-2102 DATE:01/18/2019 JMC PROJECT:18124 JMC PILL C.COM FIGURE:06 SCALE: COPYRIGHT©2019 by JMC All Rights Reserved.No part of this document maybe reproduced,stored in a retrieval system,or transmitted in any form or by means,electronic,mechanical,photocopying,recording or otherwise. without the prior written permission of JMC PLANNING,ENGINEERING,LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 8 LAND SURVEYING,PLLC I JMC SITE DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS,LLC I JOHN MEYER CONSULTING,INC.(JMC). Any modifications or alterations to this document without the written permission of JMC shall render them invalid and unusable. 18124-TRAFFIC-F1G.dwg,• TRAFFIC-FIGS.tob 9�l S.�/�—�/��b'fll •6MP:�/�—�l��b'�Y1—bZIB! 'algesnun pue piienw wagl iapuaJ pegs 0Wf to uolsslwjad uagum a411nog1!m luawnoop sigl of suogeialle jo suogeogipow duV'(3Wf)'0NI'9N111nSN00 HHX3W NHOf 13ll'S1NV1lnSN001N3WdO13AK 311S 0Wf 10lld'ONIA]AdnS ONVI 3 38n10311HMJV 3dVOSONVVONW33NION3'9NINNVId 0Wf to uolssluuad uagumloud a41lno4llm 'asmaglo io 6wpiooai bug(d000logd'Roluegoaw'oluogoala'sueow 6q io uuoJ hue uI paglwsueg jo'walsls lenaulai a uI paJols'paonpoidai aq 6ew luawnoop sI41 Jo Led ON 'paaasaa s14618IN OWf/q 60Z Oj 1HEMAdOO OOZ=„L 3-1VOS LO 32JnOld W00'3IIdOWf 6ZL8L l33fOad mr 6L0Z/8L/L0 31V(l Z02-CLZ X?J 2JnOH WV AVOH33AA HV3d 5ZZ5-ELZ(rl6) sEmmOA AVM�IAN4 (131dn0003�1 V09N AN NNOWaV AN')4MJ9 3Ad d0 39Vl11n VZVId 39CIId 3Ab H31NIO JNIddOHS 30OIN 3Aii O'dGHW038OZ1 H31N33 DNINHV31 AIHV3 3NI9VWI a3SOdObd t .. r. t 311S r. 1k gs�yk4'i �� �y � ,• j A; � .. 4. �� � � �• try ' .` '�> � �*^`� t�,� k r . P t4 no VW dr y'�'> to c d.r.s off' y rt .H 33"Y NYA MA9 f AX-MW JVNMX G 7t7�OV m/ A VA31, JPG rW� 13Mf1S—;VM AMW �j B.f Y�l31M 3L�S Y AV 31r61' . 4 31"Y NYAW09 3!"Y Nmay O t 31 Y NYAM09 31 Y NYIIMGIB Z Z � 1 • Al£ W AN Al£ *_AN N A 3--� 041 1 &97F DffWWA Y A 2 d 517E DffWN Y B O SOUK AEGE SM7 /Si7ti'IAAC Mr U4/"AY /S171f01AC EN7RAAar 6YP/WNY d BO AMN A 69W All Ala `�� -� *r � � � � ➢ --c►y,9°&". ''* _}F� Ate.,;. , n VENUE r, WMAH A S tP it foe s- s SITE � �t ♦v 4,�� �'` �+FI i.„sue-"'��° .s, PROPOSED IMAGINE EARLY LEARNING CENTER 120BEDFORDRD RYE RIDGE SHOPPING CENTER RYE RIDGE PLAZA VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK,NY ARMONK NY 10504 REOCCUPIED DRIVEWAY VOLUMES (914)2735225 PEAK WEEKDAY PM HOUR fax 273-2102 DATE:01/18/2019 JMC PROJECT:18124 JMCPLLC.COM FIGURE:08 SCALE: COPYRIGHT©2019 by JMC AN Rights Reserved.No part of this document maybe reproduced,stored in a retrieval system,or transmitted in any form or by means,electronic,mechanical,photocopying,recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of JMC PLANNING,ENGINEERING,LANDSCAPE ARCHfTECTURE 8 LAND SURVEYING,PLLC(JMC SITE DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS,LLC I JOHN MEYER CONSULTING,INC.(JMC).Any modifications or alterations to this document without the written permission of JMC shall render them invalid and unusable. 18124-TRAFFIC-F1G.dwg,• TRAFFIC-FIGS t ob � rJ24 Lr-14607�--174 � LB�1219 4 4 c10 25 �AN A Af A£ 461--► 41 � o� "CM454--► 139 car 62-3 112 P OBai1M/iUV A6 A Y BLD 7F D A I N Y 1 &91F AiB'bEWil Y A 2 d'9'1F LYai'6EWi1 Y B � 51x/1H I Bl7X SIJPE'FT /SIa'M SVT WWWA Y /SOYOOL DMADNCT DRAW Y &SOWW A WSIM ' i a y iM ` c ^P •i' 1"Y s a�" � ��� v��✓// mot„ sj 1 ° _ jIllN ) i y Y� ♦ �9 � i � ' �;s yt � a SITE .- �.. t$` r PROPOSED IMAGINE EARLY LEARNING CENTER 120BEDFORDRD RYE RIDGE SHOPPING CENTER RYE RIDGE PLAZA VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK. NY ARMONK NY 10504 { 2020 NO BUILD VOLUMES PEAK WEEKDAY AM HOUR (914) 25 fax 273-2132102 DATE:01/18/2019 JMC PROJECT:18124 JMCPLLC.COM FIGURE:09 SCALE: 1"=200' COPYRIGHT©2019 by JMC AN Rights Reserved.No part of this document maybe reproduced,stored in a retrieval system,or transmitted in any forth or by means,electronic,mechanical,photocopying,recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of JMC PLANNING,ENGINEERING,LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE&LAND SURVEYING,PLLC I JMC SITE DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS,LLC I JOHN MEYER CONSULTING,INC.(JMC). Any modifications or alterations to this document without the written permission of JMC shall render them invalid and unusable. 18124—TRAFFIC—RG.dwg,• IRAFF/C—RGS.fob 51 'L 19 cn CD00 ♦-312 4 �--236 �,�,, r149 1 p r-3 r-65 r161A� • BONA/AN A Bt7MMAN A 550-0- 41 40--3 N 480--► � 1 La CP 6 6� 96 Z � 223�j BDIMUN A►EMifE BONNAN AW9M 1 a r A d / DarU�'YE' Ar 2 s SYIE/k�M1EMA Y B O & ASS / z�voac vrnAnKE a�rA r is ro' K .,T L �^ k yyd44'. t ,t, y x 3p., .S ... sl ✓_ °.. `be..t9'nA -s * • w :yam r f...P.. >y Y a � E 'l 11 tw o gO M AV 1 � 2 s.; ?' 0 � r $41 14 f, M, SITE 1 � 5 -► `�'" 1 riL";n a PROPOSED IMAGINE EARLY LEARNING CENTER 120BEDFORDRD RYE RIDGE SHOPPING CENTER RYE RIDGE PLAZA VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK, NY ARMONK NY 10504 2020 NO BUILD VOLUMES PEAK WEEKDAY PM HOUR (fax 73-210 5 fax 273-2102 DATE:01/18/2019 JMC PROJECT:18124 JMCPLLC.COM FIGURE: 10 SCALE: COPYRIGHT©2019 by JMC All Rights Reserved.No part of this document may be reproduced,stored in a retrieval system,or transmitted in any form or by means,electronic,mechanical,photocopying,recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of JMC PLANNING,ENGINEERING,LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 8 LAND SURVEYING,PLLC I JMC SITE DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS,LLC I JOHN MEYER CONSULTING,INC.(JMC).Any modifications or alterations to this document without the written permission of JMC shall render them invalid and unusable. 1,5124-TRAFFIC-F/C.dwg,- TRAFFIC-F/CS-fob p r® LEGEND p AN A BOMA/AN A l£ BOWAN A BOA ENTERING ®� O EXITING t 25 0 twit o cn 15 LP Z m 5 Z O BOMA/AN A WMk 7T 1 B A b E d 9'1F LYB'4EWiI Y A 2 d 91F A�IE'WA Y B 3 S�n��+`SI�Fr SWUM E l fT g9M1'E'WAY �,SQHOILL� ENROVE DAMN Y O d 80IMfAN A W9" k .7 X, . ; IA ­4 Y v F, t , ';q {� S lit1� � !- q:; SITE PROPOSED IMAGINE EARLY LEARNING CENTER 120BEDFORDRD RYE RIDGE SHOPPING CENTER RYE RIDGE PLAZA VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK,NY ARMONK NY 10504 NET ADDITIONAL TRIP DISTRIBUTIONS (914)273-5225 fax 273-2102 DATE:01/18/2019 JMC PROJECT:18124 JMCPLLC.COM FIGURE:11 SCALE: 1"=200' COPYRIGHT©2019 by JMC All Rights Reserved. No part of this document maybe reproduced,stored in a retrieval system,or transmitted in any form or by means,electronic,mechanical,photocopying,recording or otherwise, without the prior wntten permission of JMC PLANNING,ENGINEERING,LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE&LAND SURVEYING,PLLC I JMC SITE DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS,LLC I JOHN MEYER CONSULTING,INC.(JMC).Any modifications or alterations to this document without the written permission of JMC shall render them invalid and unusable. 18124-TRAFFIC-FRG.dwg,• TRAFFIC-FRCS fob I I � f � f4 r2 � 14� �4r2 w o � 1` A,W AS 6bN4AN Al£ BOMAIAN A F£ � '7 BO f 5� 0'1 ? f 4� ��1 � � B0W4N AW9" BOWAN AWMW 1 &27F Dff$EWAY A 2 a 97F Off W YAY B O S7M Mr SM7 /SM OM Eff DWWWAY /SMM ENTRANCE DAYWWAY a BONUAN A W9W Nw p $ vi , MAN a�NVE . , rc � - � ': � ��� a '.i ' '�► VA; � � II . ` SITE r: PROPOSED IMAGINE EARLY LEARNING CENTER 120BEDFORDRD RYE RIDGE SHOPPING CENTER RYE RIDGE PLAZA VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK,NY ARMONK NY 10504 NET ADDITIONAL DRIVEWAY VOLUMES (914)273-5225 PEAK WEEKDAY AM HOUR fax 273-2102 DATE:01/18/2019 JMC PROJECT: 18124 JMCPLLC.COM FIGURE: 12 SCALE: COPYRIGHT©2019 by JMC All Rights Reserved.No part of this document may be reproduced,stored in a retrieval system,or transmitted in any form or by means,electronic,mechanical,photocopying,recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of JMC PLANNING,ENGINEERING,LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE d LAND SURVEYING,PLLC I JMC SITE DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS,LLC I JOHN MEYER CONSULTING,INC.(JMC).Any modifications or alterations to this document without the written permission of JMC shall render them invalid and unusable. 18124-TRAFFIC-FIC.dwg,• TRAFFIC-F/CS.fob � L � �s--�:Z��p�♦BO1N A/5A 2 rh C A N A£ A BC f a 4� � BOWW A N M/£ ROWAN A rSW 1 &97E L>fYE'WAY A 2 d.97E Ll'B'"Y 8 SW7H AXIX SM7 /Si7M Q7T Lind"AY /Sla M DKRA"OIBY£Wil Y &BONMW A W Mfi' ® �l - ! J l Q"' wM 4Pi„n c a a , w .,a . - �1 60 MP'Stp �" T XF 3 s E ► 9 ' ! E VqIA— . � SITE Vol w" a r +. 11f4t- 44 ry4 PROPOSED IMAGINE EARLY LEARNING CENTER 120BEDFORDRD RYE RIDGE SHOPPING CENTER RYE RIDGE PLAZA VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK,NY ARMONK NY 10504 NET ADDITIONAL DRIVEWAY VOLUMES (914)273-5225 PEAK WEEKDAY PM HOUR fax 273-2102 DATE:01/18/2019 JMC PROJECT: 18124 JMCPLLC.COM FIGURE: 13 SCALE: COPYRIGHT©2019 by JMC All Rights Reserved.No part of this document may be reproduced,stored in a retrieval system,or transmitted in any form or by means,electronic,mechanical,photocopying,recording or otherwise, without the prior wntlen permission of JMC PLANNING,ENGINEERING,LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE&LAND SURVEYING,PLLC I JMC SITE DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS,LLC I JOHN MEYER CONSULTING,INC.(JMC).Any modifications or alterations to this document without the written permission of JMC shall render them invalid and unusable. 18124-TRAFFIC-F/C.dW9,• TRAFFIC-F/CS fob t-408 'L 19 CD cJn f174 -4-171 � r244 J 1 p r14 r27 LA CID �1 90WAN A l£ L90WAN A t£ 4 � IMJ A Y�f► 461--► t17 46— 459--► �\wi 143 w w Cn 62� 801111 N AIEM/F BOII11M AW M 1 &97F U0'b£WAY A 2 a 97F Y B 3 /SaM Eff Ll'P WWAY SQ'i101'X DVMAW WWWAY , ,t � �:_ ,�' � ,� v�• , • T + — �V' Er►VE ,_�_ W N! 1 2 - a � o io t� k oo ten... o 4 -• *j�, j iIIVA t3l y SITE k ,. a, r, x r PROPOSED IMAGINE EARLY LEARNING CENTER 120BEDFORDRD RYE RIDGE SHOPPING CENTER RYE RIDGE PLAZA VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK, NY ARMONK NY 10504 2020 BUILD VOLUMES (914)273-5225 PEAK WEEKDAY AM HOUR fax 273-2102 DATE:01/18/2019 JMC PROJECT: 18124 JMCPLLC.COM FIGURE:14 SCALE: COPYRIGHT©2019 by JMC AJI Rights Reserved.No part of this document maybe reproduced,stored in a retrieval system,or transmitted in any form or by means,electronic,mechanical,photocopying,recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of JMC PLANNING,ENGINEERING,LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE&LAND SURVEYING,PLLC 1 JMC SITE DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS,LLC I JOHN MEYER CONSULTING,INC.(JMC). Any modifications or alterations to this document without the written permission of JMC shall render them invalid and unusable. 18124—TRAFFRC—FRG.dwg,- IRAFFRC—ERGS.fob t51 tA9 o 0 f-312 4 ---241 o w�,, �►151 8 67 P y1161 41 AN Al£ AN Al£ _� A1/AYf 550-0- 10-? 46 � IQ 165 1LA Z o w N 484-0 o �cn� ��8� � rn w r.) 96—i `� rn O &BONU4N A WOM w v -:a ' p w - ,. + .. A� x "►i N m �.- �. 0 . k tP sok Vol , T t l w4 F� SITE t'' �,��r;i,rr,�al�, •.�W a a PROPOSED IMAGINE EARLY LEARNING CENTER 120BEDFORDRD RYE RIDGE SHOPPING CENTER RYE RIDGE PLAZA VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK,NY ARMONK NY 10504 2020 BUILD VOLUMES (914)273-5225 PEAK WEEKDAY PM HOUR fax 273-2102 DATE:01/18/2019 JMC PROJECT:18124 JMCPLLC.COM FIGURE: 15 SCALE: COPYRIGHT 0 201 9 by JMC AJI Rights Reserved. No part of this document maybe reproduced,stored in a retrieval system,or transmitted in any form or by means,electronic,mechanical,photocopying,recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of JMC PLANNING,ENGINEERING,LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 8 LAND SURVEYING,PLLC I JMC SITE DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS,LLC I JOHN MEYER CONSULTING,INC.(JMC).Any modifications or alterations to this document without the written permission of JMC shall render them invalid and unusable. 18124-TRAFFIC-F1G.dwg,- TRAFFIC-FIGS.fob .a s: o 4D i Ira ,ill Vol 14 Ash _. P , 7 PROPOSED IMAGINE EARLY LEARNING CENTER 120BEDFORDRD RYE RIDGE SHOPPING CENTER RYE RIDGE PLAZA VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK.NY ARMONK NY 10504 PARKING OCCUPANCY STUDY AREA (914)273-5225 fax 273-2102 DATE 01/18/2019 JMC PROJECT:18124 JMCPLLC.COM FIGURE P-1 SCALE:1"=200' COPYRIGHT©2019 by JMC All Rights Reserved.No par,of mis document may be reproduced stored in a retrieval system.or transmitted in any form or oy means,electronic.mechanical,photocopying,recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of JMC PLANNING,ENGINEERING,LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 8 LAND SURVEYING,PLLC I JMC SITE DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS,LLC I JOHN MEYER CONSULTING,INC.(JMC).Any modifications or alterations to this docurnenl without the written permission of JMC shall render them invalid and unusable. 18124-TRAFF/C-F1C.dwg,- PARKINC-F1C.1Gb TABLE P-1 Weekday Parkinp, Utilization Survey(l) Morning � Afternoon Parking Area Supply �) (3) Vacant Spaces Vacant Spaces Lower Lot 76 57 / 75.0% 63 / 82.9% Upper Lot 197 158 / 80.2% 70 / 35.5% Total Study Area 273 215 / 78.8% 133 / 48.7% Notes: (1)Parking occupancy counts were conducted at Rye Ridge Plaza located on South Ridge Street in Rye Brook,NY on Wednedsay January 16th, 2019. (2)JMC conducted the weekday AM parking count at 8:00 AM. (3)JMC conducted the weekday PM parking count at 5:30 PM. P:\2018\18124\ADNMT,AFFIC\Parking Utilization Survey_Ml9-01-18.xlsx;P-l.tab ■ ■1 1 �N III I � �I - - - - ���� _ _ �i i� i li i� ii I�it _ i � �i� � I� �� �' � �I ��� F- LL O O O 0' Z Z = a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 _ F- � oY Z Z � Owm F- �. N �- a O Q Z O oo r C t' `� Vl r Q O y LLI E L a> (n > U 0 c c o `° `° W o E o E Y z 3 m 3 coo O o cn m cn m Z w w N N N V1 a coQ F- Q 0 0 0 0 L2jZ Z U U U U J wN m LOQ m U 0 Q J F.. U O 2 f w > 'O w0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � Iq 'd' r N N r r r fV N W ° x y 0 0 0 0 0 0 a rrww � CD 0 0 0 0 0 O = tC LM J F- 3 F- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • • i t ; O O O O O O O O O O O m m m CO CO W W o 0 0 0 0 0 0pl- 0 0 o N d d d M N N O O O O CDQ Q Q Q Q WW o C CCCC r E EEEE W4 °° m mmm U m N F- y Z OW o 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o h 00 O O r N'p W r w -it ' to r r r r r r r r > ` O 1 y0•, W o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N J O r r r r r CD .14 O O O O OCDU W W ..� 0 0 0 0 0 0 V O Ln CD 0 0 0 o O $ WQ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o J a' s CD0 0 0 0 0 yW > co V) � ti O O O O O O m m (� \ 3 r Z Z m m m O ca to (n cn cn > 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 Q Q M O O O O O O O O O O > > d O O 0 0 0 cn O O O � N =� =� U U V O Q d cn N cn (n fn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r' O CDC o 0 0 0 0 0140CA0 o r N M to tD O O p y r O O O O CO O O O O O tD O Q O O O r O O@ N J Y J Y J Y J Y J Y J Y J Y J Y J Y J Y h v E Q U Q U Q U Q U Q U Q U Q U Q U Q U Q U O w O of O O O O O O O w O w a a a a a a a a n Z w o 7 M o o o 7 In 7t o O 00 00 w 00 a) ui W) Li Lo w H ~ oLO o v> o o Ln CD o di Q O M � O O In7t O F- U r- r- rn n 00 v v v v LO o a O0 �n i• i � n � �I I IIII I IIII I II �� � I�I� ��� �i� � � � �� � ����I III � I�I�I �I �� '� I III �� I � II � �ii " " � �_ Ili - � - - - - - �i ��� ���i �� �1�i ��iii I�I� �I �i�� - I �I �I � ��il� �I� I��il � I�� � 1 �i�� 1���� �� i� � � ���� _ ����I � . � i�� : I LL Z = tl On I- ttoo LC) a) 000 O'1 6) O F' - a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Rt ? F- F- O N 00ram ? ~ Z r d N O z O O co ♦+ + C cn O d >, � a� s 3 3 Z m Q 0Q 'c > U c C O o ca m w E o E $ O o mNmtn z W W to N N m a O Q F- Q O O O O z z U U U U J W Q m U 0 Q J F U LU O S > W o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N CD CD CD CDO O O O r r r uj X no 011010010 0 0 0 0 0 0 r M M M M r r T r r o '� 0 0 0 0 a) O ~ M N N N N O O O O O ' cn C W W W C O Q Q Q W w W C C C r EEE w o U 00 30 0 03 `� mmm W o a 2 a W r T T Q > L O y�. W r o 0 000 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (A J �o O O O O O N O O O O VOCO 0) U W U w V0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O „) O O O O O o C) O O L 7 > n- a' s m m z rn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W' F- J J F- lo Q' o o a o a o a o o , (ja o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T T m m m m m m zzz CD Lo > o 0 0 0 0LO0to0CD0 0 0 > > > M M M C M O O O O 0 O O Cl O O Q Q Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E E E000 N M Cl) N N M r T T T r 0 0 0 0 0 0 y m m m fn cn (n Q a o00 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 •• T O CD C o 0 0 0 0 0 0Ito r N M `ct In CD O O O 0) T T O It 0 Nr O O O O O O l0 Cn cD Q O O C T (%j J Y J Y J Y J Y J Y J Y J Y J Y J Y J Y n � E Q Q U Q U Q U Q U Q U Q U Q U Q U Q U Q U 0 J O O OQ� OQ� O W O w O w O w O w O w M V ~ F- F- F- F- F- F- F- F- F- F- F- F- F- F- F- F- F- F- F- a a a a a a a a a a W o )n o Ln o o )n o U) o Z O e- M l7t O O 7: M l7t O O _ 00 00 00 00 0) In In N') U*) fD F- ~ O Ln O Ln O O to O Ln O W O Q O 7: M 7� O O 7 M 7t O F- w U � rn co ° v v v ui o a u� J Q F- O F- N U c J Q � ~ Z O — F J O ~ Z W O — Z co ~ O Z 1� J F F p z F Q rr1 J vJ F ~ O Z c) w � z co J � J jw oZ Z QJ N F- O z 4 01 Q d O Z C C C F - N CO 01 tD C/) J Y J Y J Y iPO-- il:w-`) iPFO-- Fl(:X-C:)) Q UO O O O O O O O F- F- F- F- F- F- Q Q Q Q Q a a. a a (L W o W) o v> C. (D Ln o Lf) O o r ri It (P o 7: c7 !7 O 00 0o Oo co of I? I? vi u? 10 O O u') O o In o uO O Lli O O r M O O r M It O Q W o a Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2019-EX-AM 1: Site Driveway A/School Exit Driveway & Bowman Avenue 01/18/2019 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations T. 41 41 T, Traffic Volume(vph) 0 456 38 7 172 0 18 0 3 173 50 40 Future Volume(vph) 0 456 38 7 172 0 18 0 3 173 50 40 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 11 11 11 11 11 11 13 13 13 12 12 12 Grade(%) 0% -1% 0% 0% Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.990 0.981 0.933 Flt Protected 0.998 0.959 0.950 Satd. Flow(prot) 0 1750 0 0 1825 0 0 1847 0 1787 1734 0 Fit Permitted 0.998 0.959 0.950 Satd. Flow(perm) 0 1750 0 0 1825 0 0 1847 0 1787 1734 0 Link Speed (mph) 15 15 30 30 Link Distance(ft) 387 270 130 103 Travel Time(s) 17.6 12.3 3.0 2.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 Heavy Vehicles(%) 0% 4% 3% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 5% Adj. Flow(vph) 0 625 52 10 236 0 25 0 4 237 68 55 Shared Lane Traffic(%) Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 677 0 0 246 0 0 29 0 237 123 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 0 0 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 0.96 0.96 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed(mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 43.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period(min) 15 Peak Weekday AM Hour Synchro 10 Report JMC 18124 Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC 2019-EX-AM 1: Site Driveway A/School Exit Driveway & Bowman Avenue 01/18/2019 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 17.8 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations T+ 4 4 T Traffic Vol,veh/h 0 456 38 7 172 0 18 0 3 173 50 40 Future Vol, veh/h 0 456 38 7 172 0 18 0 3 173 50 40 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - 0 - Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % 0 - -1 - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 4 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 5 Mvmt Flow 0 625 52 10 236 0 25 0 4 237 68 55 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minorl Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 677 0 0 969 907 651 909 933 236 Stage 1 - - - - - - 651 651 - 256 256 - Stage 2 - - - 318 256 - 653 677 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.1 - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7A 1 6.5 6.25 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.11 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.11 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy - 2.2 - 3.5 4 3.3 3.509 4 3.345 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - - 924 - - 235 278 472 257 268 796 Stage 1 0 - - - - - 461 468 - 751 699 - Stage 2 0 - - - - - 698 699 - 458 455 - Platoon blocked. % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 924 - 174 275 472 252 265 796 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - 174 275 - 252 265 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 461 468 - 751 691 - Stage 2 579 691 - 454 455 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.3 27.2 62.3 HCM LOS D F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity(veh/h) 191 924 - - 252 377 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.151 0.01 - - 0.94 0.327 HCM Control Delay(s) 27.2 - 8.9 0 - 84.8 19.1 HCM Lane LOS D A A - F C HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0.5 0 - - 8.5 1.4 Peak Weekday AM Hour Synchro 10 Report JMC 18124 Page 2 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2019-EX-AM 2: Site Driveway B/School Entrance Driveway & Bowman Avenue 01/18/2019 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations +T+ 44 ,T, Traffic Volume(vph) 123 448 61 24 162 404 17 37 17 0 0 0 Future Volume(vph) 123 448 61 24 162 404 17 37 17 0 0 0 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 11 11 11 11 11 11 16 16 16 12 12 12 Grade(%) 5% -6% -2% 1% Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped Bike Factor Frt 0.987 0.908 0.968 Fit Protected 0.990 0.998 0.988 Satd. Flow(prot) 0 1707 0 0 1705 0 0 2080 0 0 0 0 Fit Permitted 0.990 0.998 0.988 Satd. Flow(perm) 0 1707 0 0 1705 0 0 2080 0 0 0 0 Link Speed(mph) 15 15 30 30 Link Distance(ft) 270 203 149 109 Travel Time(s) 12.3 9.2 3.4 2.5 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 4 4 Peak Hour Factor 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 Heavy Vehicles(%) 2% 3% 0% 0% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Adj. Flow(vph) 168 614 84 33 222 553 23 51 23 0 0 0 Shared Lane Traffic(%) Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 866 0 0 808 0 0 97 0 0 0 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 0 0 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.01 1.01 1.01 0.84 0.84 0.84 1.01 1.01 1.01 Turning Speed(mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 89.4% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period(min) 15 Peak Weekday AM Hour Synchro 10 Report JMC 18124 Page 3 HCM 6th TWSC 2019-EX-AM 2: Site Driveway B/School Entrance Driveway & Bowman Avenue 01/18/2019 Intersection Int Delay,s/veh 4.5 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations +T+ +T+ +T+ Traffic Vol, veh/h 123 448 61 24 162 404 17 37 17 0 0 0 Future Vol, veh/h 123 448 61 24 162 404 17 37 17 0 0 0 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 4 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - - - Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 - - 0 - 0 - 16965 Grade, % - 5 - - -6 - -2 - 1 Peak Hour Factor 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 168 614 84 33 222 553 23 51 23 0 0 0 MajorlMinor Majorl Major2 Minorl Conflicting Flow All 775 0 0 698 0 0 1561 1833 656 Stage 1 - - - - - - 992 992 - Stage 2 - - - - 569 841 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - 4.1 - - 6 6.1 6 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - 5 5.1 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 5 5.1 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - 2.2 - 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 841 - 908 - - 148 94 486 Stage 1 - - - 404 364 - Stage 2 - - - - - 608 421 - Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 841 - 908 - - 92 0 486 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 92 0 - Stage 1 - - - 251 0 Stage 2 - 606 0 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 2 0.4 61 HCM LOS F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR Capacity(veh/h) 155 841 - - 908 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.627 0.2 - 0.036 - HCM Control Delay(s) 61 10.3 0 9.1 0 - HCM Lane LOS F B A A A HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 3.4 0.7 - 0.1 - - Peak Weekday AM Hour Synchro 10 Report JMC 18124 Page 4 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2019-EX-AM 3: South Ridge Street & Bowman Avenue 01/18/2019 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations T+ T. -'T -TTI. Traffic Volume(vph) 137 187 71 143 253 19 131 309 102 21 269 166 Future Volume(vph) 137 187 71 143 253 19 131 309 102 21 269 166 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 10 11 11 10 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 Grade(%) 7% -2% -1% -2% Storage Length (ft) 170 0 120 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Ped Bike Factor 0.98 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.99 Frt 0.959 0.989 0.972 0.945 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.988 0.998 Satd. Flow(prot) 1548 1657 0 1685 1794 0 0 3247 0 0 3205 0 Flt Permitted 0.318 0.344 0.570 0.901 Satd. Flow(perm) 509 1657 0 608 1794 0 0 1873 0 0 2889 0 Right Turn on Red No No No No Satd. Flow(RTOR) Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance(ft) 367 530 388 298 Travel Time(s) 8.3 12.0 8.8 6.8 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 34 6 6 34 3 37 37 3 Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Heavy Vehicles(%) 5% 2% 2% 1% 2% 0% 0% 3% 3% 0% 1% 3% Bus Blockages(#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 5 Adj. Flow(vph) 156 213 81 163 288 22 149 351 116 24 306 189 Shared Lane Traffic(%) Lane Group Flow(vph) 156 294 0 163 310 0 0 616 0 0 519 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 10 10 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.14 1.09 1.09 1.08 1.03 1.03 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.03 1.04 1.03 Turning Speed(mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 Detector Template Left Left Leading Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 20 0 20 0 Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 6 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 &0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm NA Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 6 Peak Weekday AM Hour Synchro 10 Report JMC 18124 Page 5 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2019-EX-AM I South Ridge Street & Bowman Avenue 01/18/2019 Lane Group 09 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume(vph) Future Volume(vph) Ideal Flow(vphpl) Lane Width (ft) Grade(%) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Ped Bike Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow(prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow(perm) Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow(RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance(ft) Travel Time(s) Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles(%) Bus Blockages(#/hr) Adj. Flow(vph) Shared Lane Traffic(%) Lane Group Flow(vph) Enter Blocked Intersection Lane Alignment Median Width(ft) Link Offset(ft) Crosswalk Width(ft) Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor Turning Speed(mph) Number of Detectors Detector Template Leading Detector(ft) Trailing Detector(ft) Detector 1 Position(ft) Detector 1 Size(ft) Detector 1 Type Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) Detector 1 Queue(s) Detector 1 Delay(s) Turn Type Protected Phases 9 Peak Weekday AM Hour Synchro 10 Report JMC 18124 Page 6 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2019-EX-AM 3: South Ridge Street & Bowman Avenue 101/18/2019 ---* --0- --t f- *-- *,- 4\ I* i 41 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 Detector Phase 7 4 3 8 5 2 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split(s) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 Total Split(s) 15.0 35.0 15.0 35.0 15.0 49.0 34.0 34.0 Total Split(%) 11.5% 26.9% 11.5% 26.9% 11.5% 37.7% 26.2% 26.2% Maximum Green (s) 10.0 30.0 10.0 30.0 10.0 44.0 29.0 29.0 Yellow Time(s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All-Red Time(s) 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time(s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode Max Max Max Max Max Max Max Max Walk Time(s) Flash Dont Walk(s) Pedestrian Calls(#/hr) Act Effct Green (s) 40.7 30.5 40.7 30.5 44.8 29.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.35 0.26 0.35 0.26 0.38 0.25 v/c Ratio 0.59 0.68 0.54 0.67 0.74 0.72 Control Delay 39.4 51 A 36.0 49.9 38.5 49.0 Queue Delay 0.0 &0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 39.4 51.4 36.0 49.9 38.5 49.0 LOS D D D D D D Approach Delay 47.3 45.1 38.5 49.0 Approach LOS D D D D Queue Length 50th (ft) 95 233 99 245 222 220 Queue Length 95th (ft) 150 #346 154 344 275 279 Internal Link Dist(ft) 287 450 308 218 Turn Bay Length (ft) 170 120 Base Capacity(vph) 266 430 303 466 832 725 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.59 0.68 0.54 0.67 0.74 0.72 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 130 Actuated Cycle Length: 117.6 Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Semi Act-Uncoord Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.74 Intersection Signal Delay:44.6 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 68.6% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period(min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Peak Weekday AM Hour Synchro 10 Report JMC 18124 Page 7 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2019-EX-AM I South Ridge Street & Bowman Avenue 01/18/2019 Lane Group 09 Permitted Phases Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 Minimum Split(s) 31.0 Total Split(s) 31.0 Total Split(%) 24% Maximum Green (s) 26.0 Yellow Time(s) 2.0 All-Red Time(s) 3.0 Lost Time Adjust(s) Total Lost Time(s) Lead/Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension(s) 3.0 Recall Mode None Walk Time(s) 10.0 Flash Dont Walk(s) 16.0 Pedestrian Calls(#/hr) 25 Act Effct Green(s) Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) Internal Link Dist(ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity(vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio Intersection Summary, __ ....�_ Peak Weekday AM Hour Synchro 10 Report JMC 18124 Page 8 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2019-EX-AM 3: South Ridge Street & Bowman Avenue 01/18/2019 Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 3:South Ridge Street&Bowman Avenue t02 'f O3 --*04 no, 49s _ 5 1 06 07 08 Peak Weekday AM Hour Synchro 10 Report JMC 18124 Page 9 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2019-EX-PM 1: Site Driveway A/School Exit Driveway & Bowman Avenue * 101/18/2019 4�_ I t Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations -T. Traffic Volume(vph) 0 544 39 2 309 0 25 0 15 18 0 9 Future Volume(vph) 0 544 39 2 309 0 25 0 15 18 0 9 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 11 11 11 11 11 11 13 13 13 12 12 12 Grade(%) 0% -1% 0% 0% Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.991 0.949 0.850 Fit Protected 0.970 0.950 Satd. Flow(prot) 0 1803 0 0 1810 0 0 1807 0 1805 1615 0 Fit Permitted 0.970 0.950 Satd. Flow(perm) 0 1803 0 0 1810 0 0 1807 0 1805 1615 0 Link Speed(mph) 15 15 30 30 Link Distance(ft) 387 270 130 103 Travel Time(s) 17.6 12.3 3.0 2.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles(%) 0% 1% 0% 0% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Adj. Flow(vph) 0 573 41 2 325 0 26 0 16 19 0 9 Shared Lane Traffic(%) Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 614 0 0 327 0 0 42 0 19 9 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 0 0 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 0.96 0.96 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed(mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 46.6% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period(min) 15 Peak Weekday PM Hour Synchro 10 Report JMC 18124 Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC 2019-EX-PM 1: Site Driveway A/School Exit Driveway & Bowman Avenue 01/18/2019 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations '+ +T+ *T+ T Traffic Vol,veh/h 0 544 39 2 309 0 25 0 15 18 0 9 Future Vol, veh/h 0 544 39 2 309 0 25 0 15 18 0 9 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None None - None - - None Storage Length - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 - 0 - 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 -1 0 - 0 Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 0 573 41 2 325 0 26 0 16 19 0 9 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minorl Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 614 0 0 928 923 594 931 943 325 Stage - - - - - 594 594 - 329 329 - Stage 2 - 334 329 - 602 614 - Critical Hdwy - 4.1 - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - 975 - 250 272 509 249 265 721 Stage 1 0 - - 495 496 - 688 650 - Stage 2 0 - - 684 650 - 490 486 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 975 - - 246 271 509 241 264 721 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 246 271 - 241 264 - Stage 1 - 495 496 - 688 648 - Stage 2 673 648 - 475 486 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.1 18.7 17.5 HCM LOS C C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity(veh/h) 305 975 - - 241 721 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.138 0.002 - - 0.079 0.013 HCM Control Delay(s) 18.7 8.7 0 - 21.2 10.1 HCM Lane LOS C A A - C B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.5 0 - - 0.3 0 Peak Weekday PM Hour Synchro 10 Report JMC 18124 Page 2 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2019-EX-PM 2: Site Driveway B/School Entrance Driveway & Bowman Avenue 01/18/2019 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations +T, 4 +T. Traffic Volume(vph) 10 472 95 63 233 50 78 5 71 0 0 0 Future Volume(vph) 10 472 95 63 233 50 78 5 71 0 0 0 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 11 11 11 11 11 11 16 16 16 12 12 12 Grade(%) 5% -6% -2% 1% Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.978 0.980 0.938 Flt Protected 0.999 0.991 0.975 Satd. Flow(prot) 0 1733 0 0 1825 0 0 1979 0 0 0 0 Flt Permitted 0.999 0.991 0.975 Satd.Flow(perm) 0 1733 0 0 1825 0 0 1979 0 0 0 0 Link Speed (mph) 15 15 30 30 Link Distance(ft) 270 203 149 109 Travel Time(s) 12.3 9.2 3.4 2.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Heavy Vehicles(%) 0% 1% 1% 0% 1% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Adj. Flow(vph) 11 508 102 68 251 54 84 5 76 0 0 0 Shared Lane Traffic(%) Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 621 0 0 373 0 0 165 0 0 0 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 0 0 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.01 1.01 1.01 0.84 0.84 0.84 1.01 1.01 1.01 Turning Speed(mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 68.9% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period(min) 15 Peak Weekday PM Hour Synchro 10 Report JMC 18124 Page 3 HCM 6th TWSC 2019-EX-PM 2: Site Driveway B/School Entrance Driveway & Bowman Avenue 01/18/2019 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3.9 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 4 4,- Traffic Vol,veh/h 10 472 95 63 233 50 78 5 71 0 0 0 Future Vol, veh/h 10 472 95 63 233 50 78 5 71 0 0 0 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None - - None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - 0 - 0 - - 16965 Grade, % 5 -6 -2 - 1 Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 11 508 102 68 251 54 84 5 76 0 0 0 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minorl Conflicting Flow All 305 0 0 610 0 0 995 1022 559 Stage 1 - - - - - - 581 581 - Stage 2 - - - 414 441 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - 4.1 - 6.01 6.1 6 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - 5.01 5.1 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 5.01 5.1 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - 2.2 - 3.509 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1267 - 979 - 304 266 549 Stage 1 - - - 599 536 - Stage 2 - - - 701 610 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1267 - 979 - - 275 0 549 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - 275 0 - Stage 1 - - - - 541 0 - Stage 2 - 701 0 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay,s 0.1 1.6 23.1 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR Capacity(veh/h) 361 1267 - - 979 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.459 0.008 - - 0.069 - HCM Control Delay(s) 23.1 7.9 0 - 9 0 - HCM Lane LOS C A A - A A HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 2.3 0 - - 0.2 - - Peak Weekday PM Hour Synchro 10 Report JMC 18124 Page 4 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2019-EX-PM I South Ridge Street & Bowman Avenue 101/18/2019 --1 ---1' A`t f- *-- I* i 4-1 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1 Vi T. 4T +TT Traffic Volume(vph) 157 183 219 159 146 19 99 389 140 17 308 101 Future Volume(vph) 157 183 219 159 146 19 99 389 140 17 308 101 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 10 11 11 10 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 Grade(%) 7% -2% -1% -2% Storage Length(ft) 170 0 120 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Ped Bike Factor 0.99 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.99 Frt 0.918 0.983 0.966 0.964 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.992 0.998 Satd. Flow(prot) 1626 1611 0 1685 1819 0 0 3315 0 0 3307 0 Flt Permitted 0.569 0.177 0.660 0.912 Satd. Flow(perm) 968 1611 0 313 1819 0 0 2205 0 0 3022 0 Right Turn on Red No No No No Satd. Flow(RTOR) Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance(ft) 367 530 388 298 Travel Time(s) 8.3 12.0 8.8 6.8 Confl. Peds.(#Ihr) 9 5 5 9 1 5 5 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Heavy Vehicles(%) 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 1% 1% 0% 0% 1% 1% Bus Blockages(#Ihr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 5 Adj. Flow(vph) 169 197 235 171 157 20 106 418 151 18 331 109 Shared Lane Traffic(%) Lane Group Flow(vph) 169 432 0 171 177 0 0 675 0 0 458 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 10 10 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.14 1.09 1.09 1.08 1.03 1.03 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.03 1.04 1.03 Turning Speed(mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 Detector Template Left Left Leading Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 20 0 20 0 Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 6 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm NA Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 6 Peak Weekday PM Hour Synchro 10 Report JMC 18124 Page 5 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2019-EX-PM I South Ridge Street & Bowman Avenue 01/18/2019 Lane Group 09 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume(vph) Future Volume(vph) Ideal Flow(vphpl) Lane Width (ft) Grade(%) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Ped Bike Factor Frt Fit Protected Satd. Flow(prot) Fit Permitted Satd. Flow(perm) Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow(RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance(ft) Travel Time(s) Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles(%) Bus Blockages(#/hr) Adj. Flow(vph) Shared Lane Traffic(%) Lane Group Flow(vph) Enter Blocked Intersection Lane Alignment Median Width(ft) Link Offset(ft) Crosswalk Width(ft) Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor Turning Speed(mph) Number of Detectors Detector Template Leading Detector(ft) Trailing Detector(ft) Detector 1 Position(ft) Detector 1 Size(ft) Detector 1 Type Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend(s) Detector 1 Queue(s) Detector 1 Delay(s) Turn Type Protected Phases 9 Peak Weekday PM Hour Synchro 10 Report JMC 18124 Page 6 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2019-EX-PM I South Ridge Street & Bowman Avenue 01/18/2019 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 Detector Phase 7 4 3 8 5 2 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split(s) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 Total Split(s) 15.0 35.0 15.0 35.0 15.0 49.0 34.0 34.0 Total Split(%) 11.5% 26.9% 11.5% 26.9% 11.5% 37.7% 26.2% 26.2% Maximum Green (s) 10.0 30.0 10.0 30.0 10.0 44.0 29.0 29.0 Yellow Time(s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All-Red Time(s) 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time(s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode Max Max Max Max Max Max Max Max Walk Time(s) Flash Dont Walk(s) Pedestrian Calls(#/hr) Act Effct Green (s) 40.5 30.4 40.5 30.4 44.5 29.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.38 0.29 0.38 0.29 0.42 0.28 v/c Ratio 0.39 0.93 0.68 0.34 0.65 0.54 Control Delay 25.0 65.5 37.4 34.0 28.0 36.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 25.0 65.5 37.4 34.0 28.0 36.8 LOS C E D C C D Approach Delay 54.1 35.7 28.0 36.8 Approach LOS D D C D Queue Length 50th(ft) 63 258 63 86 152 126 Queue Length 95th (ft) 165 #639 #206 201 313 248 Internal Link Dist(ft) 287 450 308 218 Turn Bay Length (ft) 170 120 Base Capacity(vph) 435 465 252 525 1040 843 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.39 0.93 0.68 0.34 0.65 0.54 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 130 Actuated Cycle Length: 105.2 Natural Cycle: 120 Control Type: Semi Act-Uncoord Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.93 Intersection Signal Delay: 38.8 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 79.3% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period(min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity,queue may be longer. Peak Weekday PM Hour Synchro 10 Report JMC 18124 Page 7 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2019-EX-PM I South Ridge Street & Bowman Avenue 01/18/2019 Lane Group 09 Permitted Phases Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 Minimum Split(s) 31.0 Total Split(s) 31.0 Total Split(%) 24% Maximum Green (s) 26.0 Yellow Time(s) 2.0 All-Red Time(s) 3.0 Lost Time Adjust(s) Total Lost Time(s) Lead/Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension(s) 3.0 Recall Mode None Walk Time(s) 10.0 Flash Dont Walk(s) 16.0 Pedestrian Calls(#/hr) 5 Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Queue Length 50th(ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) Internal Link Dist(ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity(vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio Intersection Summary Peak Weekday PM Hour Synchro 10 Report JMC 18124 Page 8 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2019-EX-PM 3: South Ridge Street & Bowman Avenue 01/18/2019 Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 3: South Ridge Street&Bowman Avenue t02 4,C)3 --I'v34 i09 49 s 15 s 35 s 05 • 06 �fc— 03 4s : 15s 3 5 s Peak Weekday PM Hour Synchro 10 Report JMC 18124 Page 9 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020-NB-AM 1: Site Driveway A/School Exit Driveway & Bowman Avenue 01/18/2019 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations k 4, +, T, Traffic Volume(vph) 0 461 41 10 174 0 19 0 4 175 51 40 Future Volume(vph) 0 461 41 10 174 0 19 0 4 175 51 40 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 11 11 11 11 11 11 13 13 13 12 12 12 Grade(%) 0% -1% 0% 0% Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.989 0.978 0.934 Fit Protected 0.997 0.960 0.950 Satd. Flow(prot) 0 1748 0 0 1823 0 0 1843 0 1787 1736 0 Fit Permitted 0.997 0.960 0.950 Satd. Flow(perm) 0 1748 0 0 1823 0 0 1843 0 1787 1736 0 Link Speed(mph) 15 15 30 30 Link Distance(ft) 387 270 130 103 Travel Time(s) 17.6 12.3 3.0 2.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 Heavy Vehicles(%) 0% 4% 3% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 5% Adj. Flow(vph) 0 632 56 14 238 0 26 0 5 240 70 55 Shared Lane Traffic(%) Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 688 0 0 252 0 0 31 0 240 125 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 0 0 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 0.96 0.96 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed(mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 44.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period(min) 15 Peak Weekday AM Hour Synchro 10 Report JMC 18124 Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC 2020-NB-AM 1: Site Driveway A/School Exit Driveway & Bowman Avenue 01/18/2019 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 20.2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations '+ +T+ 4 1 Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 461 41 10 174 0 19 0 4 175 51 40 Future Vol, veh/h 0 461 41 10 174 0 19 0 4 175 51 40 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - None None - None - None Storage Length 0 Veh in Median Storage,# 0 0 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 -1 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 4 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 5 MvmtFlow 0 632 56 14 238 0 26 0 5 240 70 55 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minorl Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 688 0 0 989 926 660 929 954 238 Stage 1 - - - - - 660 660 - 266 266 - Stage 2 - 329 266 - 663 688 - Critical Hdwy - 4.1 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.11 6.5 6.25 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - 6.1 5.5 - 6.11 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.11 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 3.5 4 3.3 3.509 4 3.345 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 916 228 271 467 249 261 794 Stage 1 0 - 455 463 - 742 692 - Stage 2 0 - - 688 692 - 452 450 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 916 - 165 266 467 243 256 794 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 165 266 - 243 256 - Stage 1 - - - - 455 463 742 680 Stage 2 - 564 680 447 450 Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.5 28.3 71.2 HCM LOS D F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity(veh/h) 186 916 - 243 365 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.169 0.015 0.987 0.342 HCM Control Delay(s) 28.3 - 9 0 - 97.9 19.9 HCM Lane LOS D A A - F C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.6 0 - - 9.3 1.5 Peak Weekday AM Hour Synchro 10 Report JMC 18124 Page 2 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020-NB-AM 2: Site Driveway B/School Entrance Driveway & Bowman Avenue 01/18/2019 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations +T+ *T' +T+ Traffic Volume(vph) 124 454 62 25 167 408 17 37 17 0 0 0 Future Volume(vph) 124 454 62 25 167 408 17 37 17 0 0 0 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width(ft) 11 11 11 11 11 11 16 16 16 12 12 12 Grade(%) 5% -6% -2% 1% Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped Bike Factor Frt 0.987 0.908 0.968 Fit Protected 0.990 0.998 0.988 Satd. Flow(prot) 0 1707 0 0 1705 0 0 2080 0 0 0 0 Fit Permitted 0.990 0.998 0.988 Said. Flow(perm) 0 1707 0 0 1705 0 0 2080 0 0 0 0 Link Speed(mph) 15 15 30 30 Link Distance(ft) 270 203 149 109 Travel Time(s) 12.3 9.2 3.4 2.5 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 4 4 Peak Hour Factor 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 Heavy Vehicles(%) 2% 3% 0% 0% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Adj.Flow(vph) 170 622 85 34 229 559 23 51 23 0 0 0 Shared Lane Traffic(%) Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 877 0 0 822 0 0 97 0 0 0 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 0 0 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.01 1.01 1.01 0.84 0.84 0.84 1.01 1.01 1.01 Turning Speed(mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop n i"'ection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type:Unsignaiized Intersection Capacity Utilization 90.3% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period(min) 15 Peak Weekday AM Hour Synchro 10 Report JMC 18124 Page 3 HCM 6th TWSC 2020-NB-AM 2: Site Driveway B/School Entrance Driveway & Bowman Avenue 01/18/2019 Intersection Int Delay,s/veh 4.8 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4.1 4 4 Traffic Vol,veh/h 124 454 62 25 167 408 17 37 17 0 0 0 Future Vol, veh/h 124 454 62 25 167 408 17 37 17 0 0 0 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 4 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None - - None Storage Length - Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - - 0 0 - 16965 Grade, % 5 - -6 -2 - 1 Peak Hour Factor 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 170 622 85 34 229 559 23 51 23 0 0 0 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minorl Conflicting Flow All 788 0 0 707 0 0 1586 1861 665 Stage 1 - - - - - - 1005 1005 - Stage 2 - - - 581 856 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 4.1 - 6 6.1 6 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - 5 5.1 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 5 5.1 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 2.2 - 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 831 - 901 - - 144 91 481 Stage 1 - - - 399 360 - Stage 2 - - - 601 415 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 831 901 - 87 0 481 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - 87 0 - Stage 1 - 243 0 - Stage 2 - 599 0 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 2 0.4 67.8 HCM LOS F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR Capacity(veh/h) 147 831 901 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.662 0.204 0.038 HCM Control Delay(s) 67.8 10.4 0 9.2 0 HCM Lane LOS F B A A A HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 3.7 0.8 - 0.1 - Peak Weekday AM Hour Synchro 10 Report JMC 18124 Page 4 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020-NB-AM I South Ridge Street & Bowman Avenue 01/18/2019 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations T. T. -Tli� *M Traffic Volume(vph) 139 189 72 144 261 19 134 316 103 21 278 170 Future Volume(vph) 139 189 72 144 261 19 134 316 103 21 278 170 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 10 11 11 10 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 Grade(%) 7% -2% -1% -2% Storage Length(ft) 170 0 120 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Ped Bike Factor 0.98 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.99 Frt 0.959 0.990 0.972 0.946 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.988 0.998 Satd. Flow(prot) 1548 1657 0 1685 1796 0 0 3248 0 0 3209 0 Flt Permitted 0.303 0.339 0.564 0.901 Satd. Flow(perm) 485 1657 0 599 1796 0 0 1853 0 0 2892 0 Right Turn on Red No No No No Satd. Flow(RTOR) Link Speed(mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance(ft) 367 530 388 298 Travel Time(s) 8.3 12.0 8.8 6.8 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 34 6 6 34 3 37 37 3 Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Heavy Vehicles(%) 5% 2% 2% 1% 2% 0% 0% 3% 3% 0% 1% 3% Bus Blockages(#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 5 Adj. Flow(vph) 158 215 82 164 297 22 152 359 117 24 316 193 Shared Lane Traffic(%) Lane Group Flow(vph) 158 297 0 164 319 0 0 628 0 0 533 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 10 10 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.14 1.09 1.09 1.08 1.03 1.03 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.03 1.04 1.03 Turning Speed(mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 Detector Template Left Left Leading Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 20 0 20 0 Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 6 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm NA Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 6 Peak Weekday AM Hour Synchro 10 Report JMC 18124 Page 5 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020-NB-AM I South Ridge Street & Bowman Avenue 01/18/2019 Lane Group 09 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume(vph) Future Volume(vph) Ideal Flow(vphpl) Lane Width (ft) Grade(%) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Ped Bike Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow(prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow(perm) Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow(RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance(ft) Travel Time(s) Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles(%) Bus Blockages(#/hr) Adj. Flow(vph) Shared Lane Traffic(%) Lane Group Flow(vph) Enter Blocked Intersection Lane Alignment Median Width(ft) Link Offset(ft) Crosswalk Width(ft) Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor Turning Speed(mph) Number of Detectors Detector Template Leading Detector(ft) Trailing Detector(ft) Detector 1 Position(ft) Detector 1 Size(ft) Detector 1 Type Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend(s) Detector 1 Queue(s) Detector 1 Delay(s) Turn Type Protected Phases 9 Peak Weekday AM Hour Synchro 10 Report JMC 18124 Page 6 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020-NB-AM I South Ridge Street & Bowman Avenue 01/18/2019 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 Detector Phase 7 4 3 8 5 2 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split(s) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 Total Split(s) 15.0 35.0 15.0 35.0 15.0 49.0 34.0 34.0 Total Split(%) 11.5% 26.9% 11.5% 26.9% 11.5% 37.7% 26.2% 26.2% Maximum Green (s) 10.0 30.0 10.0 30.0 10.0 44.0 29.0 29.0 Yellow Time(s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All-Red Time(s) 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time(s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode Max Max Max Max Max Max Max Max Walk Time(s) Flash Dont Walk(s) Pedestrian Calls(#/hr) Act Effct Green (s) 40.7 30.5 40.7 30.5 44.8 29.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.35 0.26 0.35 0.26 0.38 0.25 v/c Ratio 0.61 0.69 0.54 0.68 0.76 0.73 Control Delay 40.5 51.8 36.3 50.7 39.4 49.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 40.5 51.8 36.3 50.7 39.4 49.7 LOS D D D D D D Approach Delay 47.9 45.8 39.4 49.7 Approach LOS D D D D Queue Length 50th (ft) 96 236 100 253 227 226 Queue Length 95th (ft) #156 #352 155 #358 #287 288 Internal Link Dist(ft) 287 450 308 218 Turn Bay Length (ft) 170 120 Base Capacity(vph) 260 430 301 466 826 726 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.61 0.69 0.54 0.68 0.76 0.73 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 130 Actuated Cycle Length: 117.6 Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Semi Act-Uncoord Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.76 Intersection Signal Delay:45.3 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 69.8% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period(min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity,queue may be longer. Peak Weekday AM Hour Synchro 10 Report JMC 18124 Page 7 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020-NB-AM 3: South Ridge Street & Bowman Avenue 01/18/2019 Lane Group 09 Permitted Phases Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial(s) 4.0 Minimum Split(s) 31.0 Total Split(s) 31.0 Total Split(%) 24% Maximum Green (s) 26.0 Yellow Time(s) 2.0 All-Red Time(s) 3.0 Lost Time Adjust(s) Total Lost Time(s) Lead/Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 Recall Mode None Walk Time(s) 10.0 Flash Dont Walk(s) 16.0 Pedestrian Calls(#/hr) 25 Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Queue Length 50th(ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) Internal Link Dist(ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity(vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio Intersection Summary Peak Weekday AM Hour Synchro 10 Report JMC 18124 Page 8 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020-NB-AM 3: South Ridge Street & Bowman Avenue 01/18/2019 Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 3:South Ridge Street&Bowman Avenue t02 'rO3 --*04 "PLO9 - ? . fry Peak Weekday AM Hour Synchro 10 Report JMC 18124 Page 9 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020-NB-PM 1: Site Driveway A/School Exit Driveway & Bowman Avenue 01/18/2019 t --. �► 4� Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 't. 4 +T+ I, Traffic Volume(vph) 0 550 40 3 312 0 29 0 18 18 0 9 Future Volume(vph) 0 550 40 3 312 0 29 0 18 18 0 9 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 11 11 11 11 11 11 13 13 13 12 12 12 Grade(%) 0% -1% 0% 0% Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.991 0.949 0.850 Flt Protected 0.970 0.950 Satd. Flow(prot) 0 1803 0 0 1810 0 0 1807 0 1805 1615 0 Flt Permitted 0.970 0.950 Satd. Flow(perm) 0 1803 0 0 1810 0 0 1807 0 1805 1615 0 Link Speed (mph) 15 15 30 30 Link Distance(ft) 387 270 130 103 Travel Time(s) 17.6 12.3 3.0 2.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles(%) 0% 1% 0% 0% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Adj. Flow(vph) 0 579 42 3 328 0 31 0 19 19 0 9 Shared Lane Traffic(%) Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 621 0 0 331 0 0 50 0 19 9 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 0 0 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 0.96 0.96 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed(mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 47.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period(min) 15 Peak Weekday PM Hour Synchro 10 Report JMC 18124 Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC 2020-NB-PM 1: Site Driveway A/School Exit Driveway & Bowman Avenue 01/18/2019 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations '+ 4.� T+ T Traffic Vol,veh/h 0 550 40 3 312 0 29 0 18 18 0 9 Future Vol, veh/h 0 550 40 3 312 0 29 0 18 18 0 9 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None None - None - - None Storage Length - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 0 0 - - 0 Grade, % - 0 -1 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 0 579 42 3 328 0 31 0 19 19 0 9 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minorl Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 621 0 0 939 934 600 944 955 328 Stage 1 - - - - - - 600 600 - 334 334 - Stage 2 - - 339 334 - 610 621 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 969 - 246 268 505 244 260 718 Stage 1 0 - - 491 493 - 684 647 - Stage 2 0 - - - - 680 647 - 485 482 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 969 - 242 267 505 234 259 718 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 242 267 - 234 259 - Stage 1 - - - - 491 493 684 644 Stage 2 - 668 644 467 482 Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.1 19.2 17.8 HCM LOS C C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity(veh/h) 302 969 234 718 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.164 0.003 0.081 0.013 HCM Control Delay(s) 19.2 - 8.7 0 - 21.7 10.1 HCM Lane LOS C A A - C B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.6 0 - - 0.3 0 Peak Weekday PM Hour Synchro 10 Report JMC 18124 Page 2 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020-NB-PM 2: Site Driveway B/School Entrance Driveway & Bowman Avenue 01/18/2019 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations +T, +T# +T+ Traffic Volume(vph) 10 480 96 65 236 51 79 5 74 0 0 0 Future Volume(vph) 10 480 96 65 236 51 79 5 74 0 0 0 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width(ft) 11 11 11 11 11 11 16 16 16 12 12 12 Grade(%) 5% -6% -2% 1% Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.978 0.980 0.936 Flt Protected 0.999 0.991 0.976 Satd. Flow(prot) 0 1733 0 0 1825 0 0 1977 0 0 0 0 Flt Permitted 0.999 0.991 0.976 Satd.Flow(perm) 0 1733 0 0 1825 0 0 1977 0 0 0 0 Link Speed(mph) 15 15 30 30 Link Distance(ft) 270 203 149 109 Travel Time(s) 12.3 9.2 3.4 2.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Heavy Vehicles(%) 0% 1% 1% 0% 1% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Adj.Flow(vph) 11 516 103 70 254 55 85 5 80 0 0 0 Shared Lane Traffic(%) Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 630 0 0 379 0 0 170 0 0 0 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 0 0 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.01 1.01 1.01 0.84 0.84 0.84 1.01 1.01 1.01 Turning Speed(mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 69.9% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period(min)15 Peak Weekday PM Hour Synchro 10 Report JMC 18124 Page 3 HCM 6th TWSC 2020-NB-PM 2: Site Driveway B/School Entrance Driveway & Bowman Avenue 01/18/2019 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4.1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations T. 4- Traffic Vol,veh/h 10 480 96 65 236 51 79 5 74 0 0 0 Future Vol, veh/h 10 480 96 65 236 51 79 5 74 0 0 0 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None - - None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - 0 0 - - 16965 Grade, % 5 -6 -2 - 1 Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 11 516 103 70 254 55 85 5 80 0 0 0 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minorl Conflicting Flow All 309 0 0 619 0 0 1012 1039 568 Stage 1 - - - - - - 590 590 - Stage 2 - - - 422 449 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - 4.1 6.01 6.1 6 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 5.01 5.1 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 5.01 5.1 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 2.2 3.509 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1263 - 971 - 298 261 543 Stage 1 - - 594 532 - Stage 2 - - - - 696 605 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1263 971 268 0 543 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 268 0 - Stage 1 - 534 0 - Stage 2 696 0 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0.1 1.7 24.1 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR Capacity(veh/h) 355 1263 971 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.479 0.009 0.072 HCM Control Delay(s) 24.1 7.9 0 9 0 - HCM Lane LOS C A A A A - HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 2.5 0 0.2 - Peak Weekday PM Hour Synchro 10 Report JMC 18124 Page 4 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020-NB-PM 3: South Ridge Street & Bowman Avenue 01/18/2019 --. 4\ T J* `► 1 .� Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations T# T *TT ETT Traffic Volume(vph) 162 176 223 161 149 19 103 396 141 34 334 103 Future Volume(vph) 162 176 223 161 149 19 103 396 141 34 334 103 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width(ft) 10 11 11 10 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 Grade(%) 7% -2% -1% -2% Storage Length(ft) 170 0 120 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Taper Length(ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane U6I.Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Ped Bike Factor 0.99 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.99 Frt 0.916 0.983 0.967 0.967 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.992 0.996 Satd.Flow(prot) 1626 1607 0 1685 1819 0 0 3318 0 0 3314 0 Flt Permitted 0.564 0.181 0.627 0.853 Satd.Flow(perm) 959 1607 0 320 1819 0 0 2097 0 0 2837 0 Right Turn on Red No No No No Satd.Flow(RTOR) Link Speed(mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance(ft) 367 530 388 298 Travel Time(s) 8.3 12.0 8.8 6.8 Confl.Peds.(#/hr) 9 5 5 9 1 5 5 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Heavy Vehicles(%) 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 1% 1% 0% 0% 1% 1% Bus Blockages(#Ihr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 5 Adj.Flow(vph) 174 189 240 173 160 20 111 426 152 37 359 111 Shared Lane Traffic(%) Lane Group Flow(vph) 174 429 0 173 180 0 0 689 0 0 507 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 10 10 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.14 1.09 1.09 1.08 1.03 1.03 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.03 1.04 1.03 Turning Speed(mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 Detector Template Left Left Leading Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 20 0 20 0 Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 6 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm NA Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 6 Peak Weekday PM Hour Synchro 10 Report JMC 18124 Page 5 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020-NB-PM I South Ridge Street & Bowman Avenue 01/18/2019 Lane Group 09 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume(vph) Future Volume(vph) Ideal Flow(vphpl) Lane Width (ft) Grade(%) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Ped Bike Factor Frt Fit Protected Satd. Flow(prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow(perm) Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow(RTOR) Link Speed(mph) Link Distance(ft) Travel Time(s) Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles(%) Bus Blockages(#/hr) Adj. Flow(vph) Shared Lane Traffic(%) Lane Group Flow(vph) Enter Blocked Intersection Lane Alignment Median Width(ft) Link Offset(ft) Crosswalk Width(ft) Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor Turning Speed(mph) Number of Detectors Detector Template Leading Detector(ft) Trailing Detector(ft) Detector 1 Position(ft) Detector 1 Size(ft) Detector 1 Type Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) Detector 1 Queue(s) Detector 1 Delay(s) Turn Type Protected Phases 9 Peak Weekday PM Hour Synchro 10 Report JMC 18124 Page 6 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020-NB-PM I South Ridge Street & Bowman Avenue 01/18/2019 t --0- --* f- 4- ',- T I'* `- 1 -4/ Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 Detector Phase 7 4 3 8 5 2 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split(s) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 Total Split(s) 15.0 35.0 15.0 35.0 15.0 49.0 34.0 34.0 Total Split(%) 11.5% 26.9% 11.5% 26.9% 11.5% 37.7% 26.2% 26.2% Maximum Green (s) 10.0 30.0 10.0 30.0 10.0 44.0 29.0 29.0 Yellow Time(s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All-Red Time(s) 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time(s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode Max Max Max Max Max Max Max Max Walk Time(s) Flash Dont Walk(s) Pedestrian Calls(#/hr) Act Effct Green (s) 40.5 30.4 40.5 30A 44.5 29.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.38 0.29 0.38 0.29 0.42 0.28 v/c Ratio 0.40 0.93 0.68 0.34 0.69 0.64 Control Delay 25.3 65.1 37.5 34.0 29.0 39.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 25.3 65.1 37.5 34.0 29.0 39.3 LOS C E D C C D Approach Delay 53.6 35.8 29.0 39.3 Approach LOS D D C D Queue Length 50th(ft) 65 256 64 88 155 144 Queue Length 95th (ft) 169 #633 #207 204 #332 282 Internal Link Dist(ft) 287 450 308 218 Turn Bay Length (ft) 170 120 Base Capacity(vph) 432 463 254 525 1005 791 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.40 0.93 0.68 0.34 0.69 0.64 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length 130 Actuated Cycle Length: 105.2 Natural Cycle: 120 Control Type: Semi Act-Uncoord Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.93 Intersection Signal Delay: 39.4 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 80.9% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period(min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity,queue may be longer. Peak Weekday PM Hour Synchro 10 Report JMC 18124 Page 7 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020-NB-PM I South Ridge Street & Bowman Avenue 01/18/2019 Lane Group 09 Permitted Phases Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 Minimum Split(s) 31.0 Total Split(s) 31.0 Total Split(%) 24% Maximum Green (s) 26.0 Yellow Time(s) 2.0 All-Red Time(s) 3.0 Lost Time Adjust(s) Total Lost Time(s) Lead/Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 Recall Mode None Walk Time(s) 10.0 Flash Dont Walk(s) 16.0 Pedestrian Calls(#/hr) 5 Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) Internal Link Dist(ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity(vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio Intersection Summary Peak Weekday PM Hour Synchro 10 Report JMC 18124 Page 8 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020-NB-PM 3: South Ridge Street & Bowman Avenue 01/18/2019 Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 3:South Ridge Street&Bowman Avenue t02 f"O3 --*634 k09 05 06 07 08 - , y �, 34 F ... ; Peak Weekday PM Hour Synchro 10 Report JMC 18124 Page 9 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020-BD-AM 1: Site Driveway A/School Exit Driveway & Bowman Avenue 01/18/2019 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations k .14 -T+ T. Traffic Volume(vph) 0 461 46 14 174 0 25 0 9 175 51 40 Future Volume(vph) 0 461 46 14 174 0 25 0 9 175 51 40 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width(ft) 11 11 11 11 11 11 13 13 13 12 12 12 Grade(%) 0% -1% 0% 0% Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.988 0.965 0.934 Flt Protected 0.996 0.964 0.950 Satd. Flow(prot) 0 1746 0 0 1822 0 0 1826 0 1787 1736 0 Flt Permitted 0.996 0.964 0.950 Satd. Flow(perm) 0 1746 0 0 1822 0 0 1826 0 1787 1736 0 Link Speed (mph) 15 15 30 30 Link Distance(ft) 387 270 130 103 Travel Time(s) 17.6 12.3 3.0 2.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 Heavy Vehicles(%) 0% 4% 3% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 5% Adj. Flow(vph) 0 632 63 19 238 0 34 0 12 240 70 55 Shared Lane Traffic(%) Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 695 0 0 257 0 0 46 0 240 125 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 0 0 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 0.96 0.96 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed(mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 45.8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period(min) 15 Peak Weekday AM Hour Synchro 10 Report JMC 18124 Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC 2020-BD-AM 1 : Site Driveway A/School Exit Driveway & Bowman Avenue 01/18/2019 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 23.2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 111 4.. 4 11� Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 461 46 14 174 0 25 0 9 175 51 40 Future Vol, veh/h 0 461 46 14 174 0 25 0 9 175 51 40 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized None - None None - None Storage Length 0 Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - 0 - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % 0 - -1 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 4 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 5 Mvmt Flow 0 632 63 19 238 0 34 0 12 240 70 55 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minorl Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 695 0 0 1003 940 664 946 971 238 Stage 1 - - - - - 664 664 - 276 276 - Stage 2 - - 339 276 - 670 695 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.11 6.5 6.25 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.11 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.11 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy - 2.2 - 3.5 4 3.3 3.509 4 3.345 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 - - 910 - - 223 266 464 242 255 794 Stage 1 0 - - - 453 461 - 732 685 - Stage 2 0 - - - 680 685 - 448 447 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 910 160 260 464 -231 249 794 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - 160 260 - -231 249 - Stage 1 - - - - - 453 461 732 669 Stage 2 - 553 669 436 447 Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay,s 0 0.7 29.3 82.5 HCM LOS D F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity(veh/h) 194 - 910 231 357 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.24 0.021 1.038 0.349 HCM Control Delay(s) 29.3 9 0 114.8 20.4 HCM Lane LOS D A A F C HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0.9 - 0.1 - 10 1.5 Notes -:Volume exceeds capacity $: Delay exceeds 300s +: Computation Not Defined *:All major volume in platoon Peak Weekday AM Hour Synchro 10 Report JMC 18124 Page 2 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020-BD-AM 2: Site Driveway B/School Entrance Driveway & Bowman Avenue * 01/18/2019 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4, 4 Traffic Volume(vph) 124 459 62 27 171 408 17 37 20 0 0 0 Future Volume(vph) 124 459 62 27 171 408 17 37 20 0 0 0 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 11 11 11 11 11 11 16 16 16 12 12 12 Grade(%) 5% -6% -2% 1% Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Ped Bike Factor Frt 0.987 0.909 0.964 Flt Protected 0.990 0.998 0.989 Satd. Flow(prot) 0 1707 0 0 1707 0 0 2074 0 0 0 0 Flt Permitted 0.990 0.998 0.989 Satd. Flow(perm) 0 1707 0 0 1707 0 0 2074 0 0 0 0 Link Speed(mph) 15 15 30 30 Link Distance(ft) 270 203 149 109 Travel Time(s) 12.3 9.2 3.4 2.5 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 4 4 Peak Hour Factor 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 Heavy Vehicles(%) 2% 3% 0% 0% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Adj. Flow(vph) 170 629 85 37 234 559 23 51 27 0 0 0 Shared Lane Traffic(%) Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 884 0 0 830 0 0 101 0 0 0 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 0 0 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.01 1.01 1.01 0.84 0.84 0.84 1.01 1.01 1.01 Turning Speed(mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 91.1% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period(min) 15 Peak Weekday AM Hour Synchro 10 Report JMC 18124 Page 3 HCM 6th TWSC 2020-BD-AM 2: Site Driveway B/School Entrance Driveway & Bowman Avenue 01/18/2019 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4.9 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 4-� T. Traffic Vol,veh/h 124 459 62 27 171 408 17 37 20 0 0 0 Future Vol, veh/h 124 459 62 27 171 408 17 37 20 0 0 0 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 4 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - - None None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - 0 - 0 - 16965 Grade, % 5 -6 - -2 - 1 Peak Hour Factor 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 170 629 85 37 234 559 23 51 27 0 0 0 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minorl Conflicting Flow All 793 0 0 714 0 0 1604 1879 672 Stage 1 - - - - - - 1012 1012 - Stage 2 - - - 592 867 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - 4.1 - 6 6.1 6 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 5 5.1 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 5 5.1 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 2.2 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 828 - 895 140 89 477 Stage 1 - - 396 357 - Stage 2 - - - - 594 411 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 828 895 84 0 477 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 84 0 - Stage 1 - - 238 0 Stage 2 - 592 0 Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 2 0.4 67.5 HCM LOS F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR Capacity(veh/h) 151 828 - 895 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.671 0.205 0.041 - - HCM Control Delay(s) 67.5 10.5 0 - 9.2 0 - HCM Lane LOS F B A - A A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 3.8 0.8 - - 0.1 Peak Weekday AM Hour Synchro 10 Report JMC 18124 Page 4 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020-BD-AM I South Ridge Street & Bowman Avenue 01/18/2019 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1, -TT 41� Traffic Volume(vph) 143 192 73 144 263 19 135 316 103 21 278 173 Future Volume(vph) 143 192 73 144 263 19 135 316 103 21 278 173 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 10 11 11 10 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 Grade(%) 7% -2% -1% -2% Storage Length (ft) 170 0 120 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Ped Bike Factor 0.98 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.99 Frt 0.959 0.990 0.972 0.945 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.988 0.998 Satd.Flow(prot) 1548 1657 0 1685 1796 0 0 3248 0 0 3205 0 Flt Permitted 0.300 0.333 0.562 0.901 Satd. Flow(perm) 481 1657 0 589 1796 0 0 1847 0 0 2889 0 Right Turn on Red No No No No Satd. Flow(RTOR) Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance(ft) 367 530 388 298 Travel Time(s) 8.3 12.0 8.8 6.8 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 34 6 6 34 3 37 37 3 Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Heavy Vehicles(%) 5% 2% 2% 1% 2% 0% 0% 3% 3% 0% 1% 3% Bus Blockages(#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 5 Adj. Flow(vph) 163 218 83 164 299 22 153 359 117 24 316 197 Shared Lane Traffic(%) Lane Group Flow(vph) 163 301 0 164 321 0 0 629 0 0 537 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 10 10 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.14 1.09 1.09 1.08 1.03 1.03 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.03 1.04 1.03 Turning Speed(mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 Detector Template Left Left Leading Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 20 0 20 0 Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 6 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm NA Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 6 Peak Weekday AM Hour Synchro 10 Report JMC 18124 Page 5 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020-BD-AM I South Ridge Street & Bowman Avenue 01/18/2019 Lane Group 09 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume(vph) Future Volume(vph) Ideal Flow(vphpl) Lane Width (ft) Grade(%) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Ped Bike Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow(prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow(perm) Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow(RTOR) Link Speed(mph) Link Distance(ft) Travel Time(s) Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles(%) Bus Blockages(#/hr) Adj. Flow(vph) Shared Lane Traffic(%) Lane Group Flow(vph) Enter Blocked Intersection Lane Alignment Median Width(ft) Link Offset(ft) Crosswalk Width(ft) Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor Turning Speed(mph) Number of Detectors Detector Template Leading Detector(ft) Trailing Detector(ft) Detector 1 Position(ft) Detector 1 Size(ft) Detector 1 Type Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) Detector 1 Queue(s) Detector 1 Delay(s) Turn Type Protected Phases 9 Peak Weekday AM Hour Synchro 10 Report JMC 18124 Page 6 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020-BD-AM 3: South Ridge Street & Bowman Avenue 01/18/2019 --* -• -';V f4-- ',- 4\ t �► 1 41 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 Detector Phase 7 4 3 8 5 2 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split(s) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 Total Split(s) 15.0 35.0 15.0 35.0 15.0 49.0 34.0 34.0 Total Split(%) 11.5% 26.9% 11.5% 26.9% 11.5% 37.7% 26.2% 26.2% Maximum Green (s) 10.0 30.0 10.0 30.0 10.0 44.0 29.0 29.0 Yellow Time(s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All-Red Time(s) 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time(s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode Max Max Max Max Max Max Max Max Walk Time(s) Flash Dont Walk(s) Pedestrian Calls(#/hr) Act Effct Green(s) 40.7 30.5 40.7 30.5 44.8 29.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.35 0.26 0.35 0.26 0.38 0.25 v/c Ratio 0.63 0.70 0.55 0.69 0.76 0.74 Control Delay 41.7 52.2 36.5 50.9 39.5 50.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 41.7 52.2 36.5 50.9 39.5 50.0 LOS D D D D D D Approach Delay 48.5 46.0 39.5 50.0 Approach LOS D D D D Queue Length 50th(ft) 100 240 100 255 228 228 Queue Length 95th(ft) #168 #360 155 #362 #288 #293 Internal Link Dist(ft) 287 450 308 218 Turn Bay Length(ft) 170 120 Base Capacity(vph) 259 430 298 466 824 725 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.63 0.70 0.55 0.69 0.76 0.74 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 130 Actuated Cycle Length: 117.6 Natural Cycle: 100 Control Type:Semi Act-Uncoord Maximum v/c Ratio:0.76 Intersection Signal Delay:45.7 Intersection LOS:D Intersection Capacity Utilization 70.3% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period(min)15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity,queue may be longer. Peak Weekday AM Hour Synchro 10 Report JMC 18124 Page 7 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020-BD-AM 3: South Ridge Street & Bowman Avenue 01/18/2019 Lane Group 09 Permitted Phases Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 Minimum Split(s) 31.0 Total Split(s) 31.0 Total Split(%) 24% Maximum Green(s) 26.0 Yellow Time(s) 2.0 All-Red Time(s) 3.0 Lost Time Adjust(s) Total Lost Time(s) Lead/Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 Recall Mode None Walk Time(s) 10.0 Flash Dont Walk(s) 16.0 Pedestrian Calls(#/hr) 25 Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) Internal Link Dist(ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity(vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio Intersection Summary Peak Weekday AM Hour Synchro 10 Report JMC 18124 Page 8 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020-BD-AM 3: South Ridge Street & Bowman Avenue 01/18/2019 Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 3: South Ridge Street&Bowman Avenue t02 f O3 --IW04 Ai39 NA I 05 • L36 07 08 Peak Weekday AM Hour Synchro 10 Report JMC 18124 Page 9 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020-BD-PM 1: Site Driveway A/School Exit Driveway & Bowman Avenue 01/18/2019 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations -T., 4, t-11 Traffic Volume(vph) 0 550 46 8 312 0 33 0 22 18 0 9 Future Volume(vph) 0 550 46 8 312 0 33 0 22 18 0 9 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 11 11 11 11 11 11 13 13 13 12 12 12 Grade(%) 0% -1% 0% 0% Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.990 0.946 0.850 Flt Protected 0.999 0.971 0.950 Satd. Flow(prot) 0 1802 0 0 1809 0 0 1803 0 1805 1615 0 Fit Permitted 0.999 0.971 0.950 Satd. Flow(perm) 0 1802 0 0 1809 0 0 1803 0 1805 1615 0 Link Speed(mph) 15 15 30 30 Link Distance(ft) 387 270 130 103 Travel Time(s) 17.6 12.3 3.0 2.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Heavy Vehicles(%) 0% 1% 0% 0% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Adj. Flow(vph) 0 579 48 8 328 0 35 0 23 19 0 9 Shared Lane Traffic(%) Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 627 0 0 336 0 0 58 0 19 9 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 0 0 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 0.96 0.96 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed(mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 48.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period(min) 15 Peak Weekday PM Hour Synchro 10 Report JMC 18124 Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC 2020-BD-PM 1 : Site Driveway A/School Exit Driveway & Bowman Avenue 01/18/2019 Intersection Int Delay,s/veh 1.7 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations T. 4 +T+ T. Traffic Vol,veh/h 0 550 46 8 312 0 33 0 22 18 0 9 Future Vol, veh/h 0 550 46 8 312 0 33 0 22 18 0 9 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 0 0 - 0 Grade, % - 0 -1 0 - 0 Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 95 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 0 579 48 8 328 0 35 0 23 19 0 9 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minorl Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 627 0 0 952 947 603 959 971 328 Stage - - - - - - 603 603 - 344 344 - Stage 2 - - 349 344 - 615 627 - Critical Hdwy - 4.1 - - 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 965 - 241 263 503 239 255 718 Stage 0 - - 489 492 - 676 640 - Stage 2 0 - - 671 640 - 482 479 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 965 236 260 503 226 252 718 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 236 260 - 226 252 - Stage 1 - 489 492 - 676 634 - Stage 2 656 634 - 460 479 - Approach EB WB NB SIB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.2 19.8 18.3 HCM LOS C C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity(veh/h) 300 - 965 226 718 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.193 - 0.009 0.084 0.013 HCM Control Delay(s) 19.8 - 8.8 0 - 22.4 10.1 HCM Lane LOS C - A A - C B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.7 - - 0 - - 0.3 0 Peak Weekday PM Hour Synchro 10 Report JMC 18124 Page 2 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020-BD-PM 2: Site Driveway B/School Entrance Driveway & Bowman Avenue 01/18/2019 --* ---* "r +- *-- t I'* \I,. 1 4/ Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4�1 +T+ +T. Traffic Volume(vph) 10 484 96 67 241 51 79 5 76 0 0 0 Future Volume(vph) 10 484 96 67 241 51 79 5 76 0 0 0 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 11 11 11 11 11 11 16 16 16 12 12 12 Grade(%) 5% -6% -2% 1% Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.978 0.981 0.936 Fit Protected 0.999 0.991 0.976 Satd. Flow(prot) 0 1733 0 0 1827 0 0 1977 0 0 0 0 Flt Permitted 0.999 0.991 0.976 Said. Flow(perm) 0 1733 0 0 1827 0 0 1977 0 0 0 0 Link Speed (mph) 15 15 30 30 Link Distance(ft) 270 203 149 109 Travel Time(s) 12.3 9.2 3.4 2.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Heavy Vehicles(%) 0% 1% 1% 0% 1% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Adj. Flow(vph) 11 520 103 72 259 55 85 5 82 0 0 0 Shared Lane Traffic(%) Lane Group Flow(vph) 0 634 0 0 386 0 0 172 0 0 0 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 0 0 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.08 1.08 1.08 1.01 1.01 1.01 0.84 0.84 0.84 1.01 1.01 1.01 Turning Speed(mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 70.6% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period(min) 15 Peak Weekday PM Hour Synchro 10 Report JMC 18124 Page 3 HCM 6th TWSC 2020-BD-PM 2: Site Driveway B/School Entrance Driveway & Bowman Avenue 01/18/2019 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4.2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4* T. 4 Traffic Vol, veh/h 10 484 96 67 241 51 79 5 76 0 0 0 Future Vol, veh/h 10 484 96 67 241 51 79 5 76 0 0 0 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None None None - - None Storage Length - - Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 - 0 0 - - 16965 - Grade, % - 5 - -6 -2 - 1 Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 93 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 11 520 103 72 259 55 85 5 82 0 0 0 Major/Minor Majorl Major2 Minorl Conflicting Flow All 314 0 0 623 0 0 1025 1052 572 Stage 1 - - - - - - 594 594 - Stage 2 - - - 431 458 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 4.1 - 6.01 6.1 6 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - 5.01 5.1 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.01 5.1 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 2.2 - 3.509 4 3.3 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1258 - 968 - - 293 257 540 Stage 1 - - - 591 530 - Stage 2 - - - - 690 600 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1258 968 - 263 0 540 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - 263 0 - Stage 1 - - 530 0 - Stage 2 690 0 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0.1 1.7 24.7 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR Capacity(veh/h) 351 1258 968 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.49 0.009 0,074 - HCM Control Delay(s) 24.7 7.9 0 9 0 HCM Lane LOS C A A A A HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 2.6 0 - 0.2 Peak Weekday PM Hour Synchro 10 Report JMC 18124 Page 4 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020-BD-PM I South Ridge Street & Bowman Avenue 01/18/2019 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations T. -TT +M Traffic Volume(vph) 165 178 224 161 151 19 104 396 141 34 334 107 Future Volume(vph) 165 178 224 161 151 19 104 396 141 34 334 107 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 10 11 11 10 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 Grade(%) 7% -2% -1% -2% Storage Length (ft) 170 0 120 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Ped Bike Factor 0.99 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.99 Frt 0.916 0.984 0.967 0.966 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.992 0.996 Satd. Flow(prot) 1626 1607 0 1685 1821 0 0 3318 0 0 3310 0 Flt Permitted 0.561 0.177 0.623 0.853 Satd. Flow(perm) 954 1607 0 313 1821 0 0 2084 0 0 2834 0 Right Turn on Red No No No No Satd. Flow(RTOR) Link Speed(mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance(ft) 367 530 388 298 Travel Time(s) 8.3 12.0 8.8 6.8 Confl. Peds.(#/hr) 9 5 5 9 1 5 5 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Heavy Vehicles(%) 0% 0% 0% 1% 0% 0% 1% 1% 0% 0% 1% 1% Bus Blockages(#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 5 Adj. Flow(vph) 177 191 241 173 162 20 112 426 152 37 359 115 Shared Lane Traffic(%) Lane Group Flow(vph) 177 432 0 173 182 0 0 690 0 0 511 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 10 10 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.14 1.09 1.09 1.08 1.03 1.03 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.03 1.04 1.03 Turning Speed(mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 Detector Template Left Left Leading Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 20 0 20 0 Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 6 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Perm NA Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 6 Peak Weekday PM Hour Synchro 10 Report JMC 18124 Page 5 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020-BD-PM I South Ridge Street & Bowman Avenue 01/18/2019 Lane Group 09 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume(vph) Future Volume(vph) Ideal Flow(vphpl) Lane Width (ft) Grade(%) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Ped Bike Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow(prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow(perm) Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow(RTOR) Link Speed(mph) Link Distance(ft) Travel Time(s) Confl.Peds. (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles(%) Bus Blockages(#/hr) Adj. Flow(vph) Shared Lane Traffic(%) Lane Group Flow(vph) Enter Blocked Intersection Lane Alignment Median Width(ft) Link Offset(ft) Crosswalk Width(ft) Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor Turning Speed(mph) Number of Detectors Detector Template Leading Detector(ft) Trailing Detector(ft) Detector 1 Position(ft) Detector 1 Size(ft) Detector 1 Type Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend(s) Detector 1 Queue(s) Detector 1 Delay(s) Turn Type Protected Phases 9 Peak Weekday PM Hour Synchro 10 Report JMC 18124 Page 6 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020-BD-PM I South Ridge Street & Bowman Avenue * 101/18/2019 I t Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 Detector Phase 7 4 3 8 5 2 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Split(s) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 Total Split(s) 15.0 35.0 15.0 35.0 15.0 49.0 34.0 34.0 Total Split(%) 11.5% 26.9% 11.5% 26.9% 11.5% 37.7% 26.2% 26.2% Maximum Green (s) 10.0 30.0 10.0 30.0 10.0 44.0 29.0 29.0 Yellow Time(s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All-Red Time(s) 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 Lost Time Adjust(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time(s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode Max Max Max Max Max Max Max Max Walk Time(s) Flash Dont Walk(s) Pedestrian Calls(#/hr) Act Effct Green (s) 40.5 30.4 40.5 30.4 44.5 29.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.38 0.29 0.38 0.29 0.42 0.28 v/c Ratio 0.41 0.93 0.69 0.35 0.69 0.65 Control Delay 25.4 66.2 38.0 34.1 29.1 39.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 25.4 66.2 38.0 34.1 29.1 39.5 LOS C E D C C D Approach Delay 54.4 36.0 29.1 39.5 Approach LOS D D C D Queue Length 50th(ft) 66 258 64 88 155 145 Queue Length 95th (ft) 172 #640 #209 206 #335 #286 Internal Link Dist(ft) 287 450 308 218 Turn Bay Length (ft) 170 120 Base Capacity(vph) 431 463 252 525 1000 790 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.41 0.93 0.69 0.35 0.69 0.65 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 130 Actuated Cycle Length: 105.2 Natural Cycle: 130 Control Type: Semi Act-Uncoord Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.93 Intersection Signal Delay: 39.8 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 81.2% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period(min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity,queue may be longer. Peak Weekday PM Hour Synchro 10 Report JMC 18124 Page 7 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020-BD-PM 3: South Ridge Street & Bowman Avenue 01/18/2019 Lane Group 09 Permitted Phases Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 4.0 Minimum Split(s) 31.0 Total Split(s) 31.0 Total Split(%) 24% Maximum Green (s) 26.0 Yellow Time(s) 2.0 All-Red Time(s) 3.0 Lost Time Adjust(s) Total Lost Time(s) Lead/Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension(s) 3.0 Recall Mode None Walk Time(s) 10.0 Flash Dont Walk(s) 16.0 Pedestrian Calls(#/hr) 5 Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Queue Length 50th(ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) Internal Link Dist(ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity(vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio Intersection Summary Peak Weekday PM Hour Synchro 10 Report JMC 18124 Page 8 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 2020-BD-PM 3: South Ridge Street & Bowman Avenue 01/18/2019 Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 3:South Ridge Street&Bowman Avenue t02 fa3 --0'09 �109 05 • 06 �07 08 Peak Weekday PM Hour Synchro 10 Report JMC 18124 Page 9 29 1 Site Planning Fnvironmental Studies Y Civil Engineering Entitlements Landscape Architecture Construction Services Land Surveying 3D Visualization Transportation Engineering I Laser Scanning MEMORANDUM DATE: December 4, 2018 TO: Mr. Don Moscota, Chair and Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals Village of Rye Brook ALSO TO: Ms. Caryn O'Connor, Imagine Early Learning Center Steven Silverberg, Esq., Silverberg Zalantis LLP Mr. David English, Win Ridge Realty LLC Mr. Craig Samson, Win Ridge Realty LLC Village of Rye Brook Chairman and the Planning Board Members Mr. Michael Izzo, Building Inspector FROM: Ms. Lucille Munz,JMC RE: JMC Project 18124 Imagine Early Child Care Center 10 Rye Ridge Plaza, Suite 26 Bowman Ave Village of Rye Brook, NY This memorandum is in response to the Notice of Disapproval addressed to the Village of Rye Brook Planning Board, dated November 16, 2018 from Mr. Michael Izzo, Building Inspector for the Village of Rye Brook for the above noted project. We have provided responses to the three (3) sections of the Village Zoning Code that were identified by Mr. Izzo, for the Imagine Early Learning Child Care Center that Mr. Izzo indicates do not comply with the current Village Code. For your convenience we have identified the comments noted in the Notice of Disapproval below, which are followed by our responses: Comment No. I §250-6.H.(3)(c): The amount of required yard play area for this child day care center is I I,000 square feet. The applicant is proposing to provide 3,400 square feet of yard play area. Response No. I JMC Planning Engineering Landscape Architecture & Land Surveying, PLLC I JMC Site Development Consultants, LLC 120 BEDFORD ROAD I ARMONK,NY 10504 1 914.273.5225 1 MAIL@1MCPLLC.COM I JMCPLLC.COM The code requires that there be 1,000 s.f. of suitability fenced rear or side yard play area for each five children or part thereof. However; the code does not clearly specify whether this requirement shall be applicable for the maximum number of children in the facility or the actual number of children using the outdoor area at any one time, per shift and/or class. Therefore, the applicant is requesting an interpretation regarding code compliance for this item and/or a variance. The applicant is proposing a child care facility that would accommodate 55 children. Of the 55 children, 9 are infants and 12 are toddlers 18 months to 3 years of age, and 34 preschoolers ages 3 years to 5 years of age. Infants would not be using the outdoor play area which reduces the number to (46) children and New York State Licensing rules note that, "Children under three years of age may not participate in mixed age groups except that for limited periods of time at the beginning and end of the child day care center's daily operation, toddlers may be in a group with preschoolers." In accordance with the above noted State licensing requirement, the toddlers would not be on the playground at the same time as the pre-schoolers. Therefore, the 12 toddlers would be using the play area independently and implementing the 1:5 ratio per 1,000 s.f., the requirement for play area would be 2,400 s.f. In addition, the 34 pre-school age children would be utilizing the play area in two class groups with a maximum number of children of 17 at one time. Implementing the same ratio of 1:5 children per 1,000 s.f. would require a play area of 3,400 s.f. The proposed space for outdoor play area is 3,400 that includes recalibration of the fencing to maximize the space that we believe meets the spirit and intent of the code requirement. The applicant also intends to utilize the adjacent public park space for walks and outdoor activities which further augments outdoor special requirements and the applicant has been in concurrent negotiations with the Village Administrator for a special licensing agreement for utilization of the adjacent park/open space should your Board determine that, despite the analysis above, additional play area is required. In furtherance of our position, we have reviewed other municipal regulations of communities within Westchester County noting requirements for required open space for child care facilities and note the following: Community Regulation North Castle 200 s.f. per child per shift Harrison Subject to NYS Dept. of Children Services Briarcliff Manor 50 s.f. per child Comment No. 2 2 N §250-6.14.(3)(e): The center shall not have more than 15 children in any case, except if the building is of fireproof or semi-fireproof construction as defined by the Building Code of the Village of Rye Brook. The applicant is proposing to have 55 children in the existing shopping center building which is not fireproof or semi-fireproof construction as defined by the Building Code of the Village of Rye Brook. Response No. 2 Please see the attached letter from Mr. Neil Carnow, R.A, to the Zoning Board of Appeals, dated 12/03/2018, which provides an analysis and comparison of the 1950 Village Code with current New York State building code definitions (adopted by the Village as part of Chapter 91) and compliance. Per Mr. Carnow's letter he notes that "the current building code would allow nearly twice the occupancy load proposed by the applicant (55 children and 10-12 adults) and nearly 10 times the occupancy allowable by the language in the zoning ordinance (15 children). The applicant is requesting an interpretation on comment no. 2. Comment No. 3 §250-6.H.(3)(f): The center shall have on off-street drop-offlpickup area capable of storing 55 vehicles simultaneously delivering and/or collecting children from this facility. The applicant is providing no dedicated off-street drop-of flpickup area. Response No. 3 This comment references that a center shall have an off-street drop-off/pickup area capable of storing the maximum number of vehicles simultaneously delivering and/or collecting children from the facility. This requirement if applied to the 15-child number represented in the code, would require a drop off area of 300 linear feet (20' per car X 15 cars) to accommodate 15 cars, which is equivalent to the length of a football field, and which would present a hardship for any proposed child care facility, other than maybe an existing school and/or church with enough road frontage to accommodate this requirement, which would then likely interfere with traffic circulation on that road, unless there was an existing 300 foot turning lane into the property. Since there is adjacent and more than adequate parking spaces to accommodate drop-off and pickup at this facility, and that parents and caregivers are required to bring their children, many of whom are infants and toddlers, into the day care center per the operational rules of the applicant. Therefore, we believe that having adequate parking is better suited to effectively address this requirement and fully addresses the spirit and intent of this code requirement. In addition, curbside drop-off is not an acceptable practice in modern daycare/childcare centers since it is impractical given the complexity of removing infants and sometimes uncooperative toddlers/preschoolers from vehicles. The drop-off provision is more applicable for middle schoolers and high students. In addition, the Imagine Early Learning Center has a no-drop-off policy, all parents/caregivers must park and walk their children to and from the center; we 3 therefore believe that adhering to this aspect of the code to provide a drop-off area to simultaneously deliver and/or collect children from the proposed facility does not align with the practical aspects of dealing with young children, safety and how the center will operate in light of those considerations. Presently there is adequate and adjacent parking on site to accommodate the required parking proposed by the applicant. In addition, parent/caregiver drop-offs generally happened prior to 9:00 am, which is prior to when most of the medical and retail spaces open. The pickup times range from 4:00 — 6:30 pm, with the bulk of pickups ranging from 5:30— 6:30 pm; which is after when most of the medical office space has closed for the day. The center is also closed on weekends, which also frees up any parking required. The applicant is requesting a variance on comment no. 3. Thank you in advance for your time and consideration on the above noted variance and interpretation considerations and we look forward to working with the Zoning Board and the Village's Building Department and Planning Board and on this important application. If you have any further comments or questions, please feel free to contact our office directly at (914) 273- 5225. p.\2018\18124\admin\applications\jmc memo_12-448_(rev.2).docx 4 CA) c D /nZ\\ D V/ D 0 C/) z rn 0 n n <D rn zm C C/� rn � D m n rn r _ D � zm c/-) n Z -1 C/) �CD r 0 r- � -v o1-1 cn ou "., (- r- N 0• G� C/) 0 000 m Z �o� rn � Z � rn � 070 0 0 0 -0 G) M 70 rn i Z --a M CDN Z �„ D n C rn N O O V i" 3t a iIV>3 z z Zrnrn0rn y C� D vv� rn��rnrn �OO����� O 1 CA) 0 0 -nnnDZ0 -� rn znnrnD--�rn� Ln>>F°=700 O -„ -nZ�^Z MM m vvr m m 0 - z m zrn00Z c„pO0---1 m- r 0 � 0 o v rn . zZ �0 0 -n O �- z 0 0 > x Cn Cn > - - -n��z 0000- 0 00 �- O�v 0�� --O o O -0= c/>m�ZZ ;;u m 0 O mr7CC7000Z rn C� Z Z go -1 = -7' � 0 - V / v, Z d -�v . . . . rn M Z. � � r=r�Q°Qo� - rn <_ r m m D 0 Q° -0- (A - 4 Z z 0 m O � D ",n��z-'� -� - 00 -v Z 0 r � 90 � roz0 Zgo 90 MD �'� - „�-i�rn�Zz y �- m Z Z Dc On rn n D Z CA I r D - z Z o • 0 m 0 m < D �- n C/) r ,o r D D z z V- W C ❑❑ rn (� ❑ , fT'i C C x I I I rnrn H r- II _II_; II�zD0 ;__; II_ Dz ZX Irr1 Fir 'rrr' fir I -, I II IC IIq�I II Z0"' jI'� jI EJ rn - L_J L_J D � � � �=�1 � II � II � o D II II L__jL__� II z v' rnp / � In> LL-: 7::J Pq L-- < > rn --1 0 z �- —�- Z m T 0 IM n------ = D rn -+ -I�--J m In C/) D z m I� n D I l 7-1 Z m n-- G� II I I�I� 011 ------ ---- D lu 0 r 1 r— _ 0 III LIM J_f= � --- II II U I ---� z z �.�-If II • o• c/) � ° o r JJ ou p c„ I-- I H / LL a., > n �;o cn 00 0 m -7 -J-E-- I ; I I Z :-F I � I 7 F ; I .. r r I I LL Jj L-------------------- oZ CIO crn -r I - -< CD -JL-1---------JI m ICJ Z m y �---------- � 0 70 I I o xm LL = Jj ----------- III 0 x 71 G M z I I I"Tl Z7 rn H � m >= II < C D I x I rr D N j III m LL crn O D n D m - I m Z I (� C 11 � rn rn D x m � �r0 N rn 0 D�,• o �D z CDD0 Z rn to V W 01* Is (/)v In y rn = M .. 0 o 000 r II �p � Z � O x 't7 o \� 0 0 N M D z w z 0 II I I I II -u m Dx II m ILL J I rr- II �;;urn n-v can -nn rnz rn rn m rn x Z r rn DDC� ��c rnr- 70rn �Orrn>M �0� nZ ZD . �n��� O ZZ� �< rn0 mm p°rn�Orn�O rn XXn ZrnZ r� �Z ����-� -II _D -n0 Zr mm =-�mnz� _ G�G� G�-x OG� Z �D -'D-i m my zCX p= � OZS?°��D T >mZ me rn-n DO 0-n�z0 p Dnm �cnrn �x Zrn �0Om mQo r�.. DQoCA 0� nz �00`�<o O Zn '-v,Qo �� rnZ �70 cf,p <D CoDrn Ov) Oo� O��' 00 Z nr 0<Z9 0- 70Zz z� 0 z -o < D D Z D v, -< z n m D n x m M C/) OCr„ rn-r'� zrnrl d Ocn 70 to -n- rO� � = Z rn -°? Z z 0 D m = z> �00 0 r-n z D v' D z Z r I 1 N n �v An 8 ,-,-, x H � --i ;;a M k ;;a O D H H E) �_�-�T 1[- r-r- -i-� _-I rr� �-- _ r _ �y r-r- I I I � r r r r r r r r L_ J L _J L -fir - '�� _`-��-- - - -a-L= J-� �r - ; J - - �- - -fir - �-� -,- �-- -!- - -I-� _ �-I- - �- -� - -�� C�=F_� I I I II II I I I I Il4 -04�;� II I 1) I � II II IL_JI L�j-4- �F I -I I I I-�I I I III/\II I - - -�- -I - ►T \ II III i� III II II III i� III II I II II I I p Cr-r-7 I I II II II II C I J( L= J �I L= J I I L= J L =J ((- _ L= J _ I I \ _�fi (I _ L= J J - L = t =t t -r 7t' I -t -r T T -r IL_JI IL_JI II/\II rj�1 T-1 >-Tv EM OEXI - ITT 77 LF�= I vl � I(� I I \/ I I I I I T T T II Cr r�l II(��I IF I - 1i Ir -=,1=�-! - L I \� IL=JV I�\�,I _ IL _ JI- _I _ IL , = _J L - \/ I I F - �I _ IL=J1 - � r-� IL =J1 �� � I- -IL - J II II II II �I I I I I I I I I I I 1-I-� - IL =JL Imo_-1-� -- 1 1 1------------- n-- - - -�j-I T- � I 1- I 1 + I I I I I .� I --- 1---1--I--I L-L-C-C-I--I-�- L-1---L- _I�_� I I I-�-► I\pJ -� F� =1- -I� �- IL =JI- -IL_JI- _I L-L- --- ! II II ! II II �� I I I I I 1�LI_ L:�'� _I_ _L r_7� J1�-7I I�i C -� - =J�- -I--IL-JI- -I irk L J - (� I- n T] T II r-r-�- \/� I--IL-=�I--! I� r�� II 11 II II rI!L -JI 1 - - -1 -1- I I I II Illi�ll II 11 1 = = L J I� �I L J F I- T -T� - Il- - I I I-��i- --=I--I=-I--I- I I(`"��I I \,�� II II II _JI _ _ I f'-1J1 I I I I I I I- L�_I�� I��I_-I;�/\�;I��.-I�-�--�L -�- = r r �I 5r- L _JI__I I I I I I I I u�L_J � II r I =------- II L-J �-T-�_-�--i41 I T �� I- I I I -1 I I I C F- �- �Cr I I I I L-f �-�- ----1--I�I IL_JI I I II II I_ �►-=1_—=1� -I- I 1 - _-I--I--F- IF _11 IL_J L-J r r r+ I I r r-rl I I I I 1 /\ -_1 L_-L,--�rC_IL-JI �r--�_�-_ C-I'�-,,I- I 1`- �'IF, /-711 IF �I ! Ir �I�\/�I Ir I I I� Ir _1 Ir �I _1L=J —� ��, I II/\I I I+ I II/\I I I-- I I I I I 1-fT �_='I�-AI--1�_�_�- 1L=J-l-=A�--1L=J1--L--I - JI--IL_JI- �� I(p�l - I I I I I I I I I I I� r r�'� I(\p�\- _ EM 0 EXI I \p)l J I_ I T I -I �1- `'� T I- T -I � f I 1- I 1- -�" _ I I I I I H _[-_L-1-_ L-L-L- /\I T _ - -I _�7F r �11 I�� \�� �TTF Y r r 1 I I I I I I I I I I1- r r rl I_ I I 1 I 1� I_ IL=J1\� IL=J1 _ IL_JI �I��L��L- _��_�-�=JC�1 I�4, O z _ I \p I �--- - -1 11-I I I I I I I III /\ III I I I I I I �p Il II lI \/ II I I I �L � �L_JAL_AIL _JL r� - -F_ - Tr=-� - - -/\�I_ _I I I I I I I k _;I I II II II II 11 11 1 _ III-rT-r �Tlrn _LL _J -�I I I [-_r III-1 11 �� I I� I I .�-!.�-��- -r-r-r 1i ii I I �J I_ _I �J I(o�l - I �J 1-�-�-a cJ _I =I J1� I I I I (J7 T �� J 1 11 1 - IL_ JI - 1L- JI _ 1L _ J1 - - 1 I= 1_ I_ I_ I_ I -I r-r- -�(`JE IT -� - - - - - ----- - - II I I I IL- AL/\-IJI _ IL_ _ -J - I 1 III I 1 1 = rn o r 1 4 4- ❑ I I I I I rn nnl l O -v L-� I I -�� uu OuLJ �_� v y 0 fi fi Cn CDi0Drn70 v 7070ZCc/) =-070cn _--i70N7 z70_ 70 Qo=rnrn -_�M Zrn im mrnrnO�D rn-o6 � �: �,-> n m r >�m =rnXrn �< O-Z-1 : �/,Oxr''rn rn =j 3:< z >_ O _ rn cry xOxrn70 O nOnDZD OZ� �O ,-O c/)Z -O3: O r- 0 Z=< n<70 > M __q o D< r- z 0 rn rM r-;u O r<n -ram r<n = D C� r<n O r-n„0 o C/) D o=>xF3: -4 rnX z�rn 0m n ---I Dx�S?° ��^' ZED pO�Drn � m O�rNZrn �GiG)Dnx ��� �_�� _< �r rn� rD D .. -nC/") _n 0 rn _�� ,n Dry �C Dy �F�---iMM<r - Z O�D�� Z 70_pC.� -�Z zv) C� p°�O n�rnD� Z r D.C'z'rn0�0 — rn���Z-� UZ-°� 0_n > C Ornrn O�(Dm rn CO > ZCp� m =zr�0E2 V)>rn �-r' < rn - Z D� �,D�G) Z m ����� cn - D�cnZQoZ Or=Zrn� QoZ =�Z-nrn n0go OZ�rn II OF_OF_�0 ���� -arn zz> O V)M rm crn„�r- O O rnz F- Z z / -n rn� rnrn- �9°rn� G�pD .. �- mc/)�=ern O O• x0�= ��Z ZG�70 C/-) C =*D C'=� ?� O z Q°�-' -1 Z CCDrn `-� Z rnm rOy CD rn x .. y Z m0 -00 Drn 90 =�n 1 D-,C rn O� ��rn F- ;--iZrn D0 --� m m c� n m . m > > > 70 ;;a m C/,) N px O ODO c/�OD rn n �n0 z .. rn _ C/,) Cn CC Darn �� _ �m C-i � rn r imC/) C/1) D _O 70D `/'> Z n 90 Z p O �n z O w rn = . 0 ..c Z X o „if r� �► 9 -9 5 4 W ❑� C c„ ❑ �: C/) m m DZ zx D 70 ,,U > O 0 v, z C/) m 0 n I 7-� n C � m z m rn � �D m rn n I ra = D ---I z m rn G� cn n I rn Z C% can o D O rr— --U I cZ cn V W 01*F D r r Is C/) n D m 0 00 I I o x 1�Ij cj, Jo 5" 201 - 1 0" • � � � y x ; rn X D -�' x Z EGRESS PATHS > O x z 0 (JO > 7 C� C/) (4 • Z x D O 0 m �� 0 70 p � V C1� ~ n rn I: :o D -0 rn- - rn O Cn y 7u *. n ®�0 x �' < Z O . 0 cT °° z Q cm n m > n r r Z zO rrn -< 0 cn ou V O � :�E Q `CJ _ D � 0 _ L3 • rn D ; Z o D O =n •p•� _ rn :�;y � � i X .D.X z 0 z 0 �z.-� CUBBIES • • D _ '- = CUBBIES 70 t/� �' ' °o • 0 EG R ESS PATHS rn H J . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - CUBBIES z • -p C; O` D _ CUBBIES N CD x n O = N M W •'. - 0 •' r n CA) rn N ' • . . F- cn _ 00 O x z O GRESS PATHS _ Oz � OzC: rn I O oD �0 Cn x �o =_ n� _ o!n � m -+LOAD N � _ V/oz Q a . I � z 0 D TI Z S?° � -n p . rn rn rn z rn Q '0 x XN n n 0 0rn (D I rn X �D� �� z ' 6'-5" 15" 33 .3 D z za Z7 a • go -n -G w rn rn -nrn cn — >1 =1 c.� l n D Z 0 z 0 70 -5 rn 4' W. DEDICAT D , PASSAGE 510 z 0 1 1 '-8" 5'A , 4'-011J,5'1 14'-3" o� w cn w v 0 0 27'-2" tn�7�Z �— rn --pr-p �-v -n rcnp rnWZ �rnC,)Z Z� rn rn rn rn D Z rn Z > rn � C z c D= r c 0 0 D a rn D D Cn rn rn y rn rn D „ rn O _ D -, Z O �- v� -- rn ����� �M prn = -v Z Z� D�O� �Z �r�0 ;;u 200� rn200� zn >Ci _ �00p - �.. 0 v� �� r�rED rn- �pc� -�T p ern,) m<<rn �O rn70 0 >- r—OZ 90Z -<�70 =nc� v'�0 >cr> c =M> - 0 rn r Z > � G� -o C� D 0 Z D O•• p m� -v p� �- -, C X - ��rnrn � �rn Z � C� Dz - r ��rn G� rn�pX�' �� �rn rn r rnD Op D <=O� �� . >-V rnrnD= D C cCi��-rn-i= Z C/'Z Z� �' X OZX�'Z Z �70�= prn �r� �rnr"-' rnD r- in =cr�M> c�� m-� n G�� _'=O> --q 1 r0�'r > n oy �� O--- �'7oo 0+-�i >r-- n�G� Xn�r C- m > m IT! OO;a 0 Q> �� 90 p � _ �pq n70 � ODD rn0 pp0 -7up „r--a y �rn-n�QD Oy n0 D D m n 0r� rn �c�� _np v�Z ���'� �C�D Z oz D n � ,-,-, ZQQ x -o�� Cp DC�cn OQ�D D=cam y-Z-{7u- 70 -I�T,ngZ _,_,� Zn m F- -n -n „ D �° z n < 0 O=Q ZQ �� m cn 0oon-) ,�, -n rn� -'X;u 70r D� �D 0 ma D D �Orn Qom_ O� -�Q 0cQ �Dn X-�OG� rnm rn-� y = = rn OZ D ZCrn Z.. -p nn =c„' rn p X O /) ---i Z o�: Dc. rnrnD • -v Q° r -v G� �- n rn D cn n-'D='-' OD r- M > -n OC) n ----q =n r n rn mac= rn rnrn - CD - OOD =Dr-� -o �D � m rn 70 rn�� Orn Z< �M0 DJ Zn �Z rn- Zorn -+ _ -n Q -� —� �rn0-Di D ZO � z rn DZZ zZ D<� V) crXZ rn Dz - p ,� Z00 �rn nrn� Q°�rn m0Vo p �� O n -n �� M�� -u O D rn c O < Z< Z r p D z rn Z -� - M Z r V) � � 0 T ,off l 1 ��V w�00 C I cn o Cn < - z D rn Z � x D mD -<70 o 0C/) Z C/) ^m 0 l I n <D m --� C C/- 1 rn � �D m t I I -° Z D --I zm m O l ! 170 7' CC/) m C/) C/1) � r D Q r-cn V 1 M M z O rn � O m C z m � O V W D MINIIIIIIIIIIII C/) n = D m NO 000 r- Ul O X o rlj T ee rr f I L --- i .............. 1 HD z z � z z N= m rn M M i y= rn x x O 0111++ = z � _ = m m m x x x Z D C/-)C/)C/)C/)r- i�: -0 -o -o -v T 0 Z z cn cn � < Z Z Z Z y 0 x m G� G� G� G) 0 0 = 0 rn r- �� r- � = Z � C r r r Z Z Z m m p m m m m m DC m m M O O O Z m x ran I z rn rn rn .-=.-r rn X - m�:n m x x x m � -n m rnrn 0 F D Z m m m x GD � y 0 C/) m x O p r z rn rm- m m n� n; o D ooz 0E: 3: D G > m D z -� � n O D rn m m 3> m O z C/)D D m cZ x r- D Z p D r- rn p G� z v) r . c/) r- m CA) DZ D �> O cn z v) m 0 n n <D m z m rn � �D m n r"o= D --I z M ce,-) n 7-4 �C/) 0 r- o r- o• c/1) � C r- o• G� cn C/) 0 OC)o u z74 V w 01*1 n v, r- n DOO= oz p -v rn cn D 00 C D Cn mD O O mZO O A fin • O= C/)O �� Z � D 7-� Z I D 70 zD p W 0 �cn �o n W rn v, Z (D i r— OC/) n n� OD C n Z rn Cl cn p 70 R D D r r cn n rn= �7 ca C n rn= Cn O n = = z c/) co r D < Z rnrn Mr =r r p v> --� _� �zJ <� D� D rn C �„ rn r OD z0 O� ZD p° rnD Z D Z O� rn D Mc S?° �, p z �O OO ZO -�O m 0 �z �� �p O� O� m - -D rO -n � rn --� -o = -� 71 O = rn r rn D z � cn n m r O`n : --- i -�� 00 n0�� =D0 z0 �D -or Dp rnrrrn �pD� Ornp �O NC Gi�NO rn <n rn - - - >-Dvo,� 0 Z70 ?� Z� 71M rnn -n2p DO .. n 0 D p �r0 70 rn0 C M -n �°O0 D < p O O rn C-� � < m70 _ 0 0> Fi � z (n n � p W D -� = Z ,- -v- \p0 DO rn - O9 rnX *,� � O rn 0 p > > 00 1 00 r c„ X D m 70 � 0 = r 0 2 rn W 0 Z Z m 70 90 0 0 i� T-nf a,-nIl o - = 00 J rn _ -n N N - -n — - rn � r p N _I N J J 0 N .p N cn rn -n D O O Drn D X?� n p �`_m rn m n n Co z n rn 0__ n m m ou rn r— r 0 O tQ -p < ;U > 0< o Sp Z v,m cD =� ii rn �c n • rn•`f' _ �"0 O N O DAD < rn SE r '- ,� _ !� Z rn rn C M J N O o A0 I = o - o iC7 oZ -n — I _ m r 0 o p SITE PLAN APPROVAL DRAWINGS PROPOSED IMAGINE EARLY LEARNING CENTER PARCEL ID#141.27-1-7(WIN PLAZA LLC PROPERTY, PARCEL B) WESTCHESTER COUNTY RYE RIDGE SHOPPING CENTER RYE RIDGE PLAZA VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK, NY A Ipp icant: M JMC Drawing List: IMAGINE EARLY LEARNING CENTERS 250 BEDFORD PARK BLVD WEST C-1 COVER SHEET t BRONX,NY 10468 - `- --" ` S-1 SITE PLAN A. (914)468-7300 •F3 S-2 SITE PLAN ENLARGEMENT AND PHOTOS C-900 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS Site Planner,Civil Engineer, C-901 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS Surveyor and Landscape Architect: 120 BEDFORD ROAD , ARMONK,NY 10504 (914)273-5225 BUILDING CODE STANDARDS Attorney: t'-`. DESCRIPTION REQUIRED PROPOSED SILVERBERG ZALANTIS,LLP a NDGHBORHooD CHARACTER AIEI Es 220 WHITE PLAINS ROAD �� ' TARRttOWN,NY 10591 ''=' LOT AREA 334 AD " :' OUTSIDE PLAY AREA SETBACK 6Y (914)682-0707 ,§ g � _ MINIMUM NUMBER OF CHILDREN 55 'x^ - SUITABLE OUNOQR PLAY AREA(1,OW SF./5 CHILDREN) }3,264 � �' Y"T DROP OFFILk UP AREAS YES kY£ s" SITE > .. t: Ps w A Bc'E Csk $g A �11 OVERALL MAP v .w, SCALE:1"=40' ° GENERAL GONSTRUGTION NOTES APPLY TO ALL WORK HEREIN: RPPeM Fim�. f`.ro 5 I ro,ma `hOPo sa,er i PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION,THE CONTRACTOR SHAll CALL 811'DIG SAFELY(1-800-962-7962)TO HAVE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES LOCATED.EKPLORATORY IXCAVADONS SHALL COMPLY WITH CODE 753 REQUIREMENTS.NO WORN SHALL COMMENCE UNTIL ALL ME OPERATORS HAVE NOTIFIED THE CONTRACTOR THAT THOR ear I I UTILITIES HAVE BEEN LOCATED.ME CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PRESERVATION W ALL PUBUC AND PRIVATE UNDERGROUND AND SURFACE T -ION I MMES AND STRUCTURES AT OR ADJACENT TO THE BEOF CONSTHUCTON,INSOFAR AS THEY MAY BE ENDANGERED BY ME CONTRACTOR'S OPERATIONS.MIS ATIcn OE EI�0 EVCErvcERAVAyI:AetE AWMH SHALL HIM WE YAIETHER OR NOT THEY ARE MOM ON ME CORMACT DRAWINGS.IF THEY ARE SHORN ON THE DRAWNGB,THOR LWATONS ARE NOT RECORD"'.AN6AVcroRLTUIn 14€. I.,„o a GUARANTEED EVEN THOUGH THE INFORMATION WAS OBTAINED FROM THE BEST AVAAABLL SOURCES,AND IN ANY EVENT,OTHER MUT THESE PLANS MAY BE ES ON I ENCOUNTERED IN ME FEUD.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL,AT HIS OMN EXPENSE,IMMEDIATELY REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY STRUCTURES(R LITOTES THAT HE DAMAGES T AND SHALL CONSTANTLY PROCEED MTH CALTON TO PREVENT UNDUE INTERRUPTION OF UTLItt SERVICE. GLARAxTEEOOrE IixEAC ACATOR TUAL LONOTGT.Ory tE OF Ups TO ACTUALEXCAGETOry -ALTERATION OFPwNs ySP 2 CONTRACTOR SHALL HAND OIG TEST PI1S TO VERIFY THE LOCATION a ALL IXISTINC UNDERCAWNO UTILITIES PRIOR i0 ME START OF CWBiRUCTICN. COrvs RUCT W s-FICATCNS PIATSANO CON1RACi(IR SHALL VERIFY EXSTING UTMEB GEPTiS AND ADVISE Of ANY CDNFMCTS WTH PRWpSW UTILITIES If WNNC15 ME PRESENT.THE OWNER'S FlEID - '' ORTs eEAR NOTHE SEAL y ^•€ NEPRESENTARVE,,MC,PLLC AND THE APPLICABLE MUNICIPALITY OR AGENCY SHALL BE NOTIFIED IN'METING.TIE USING/PROPOSE,UTUTES RFEOCATIW SHALL REVIS 0 A LENSED PROFESSIONAL L,G Mtii _ BE DESIGNED BY AC.PLUS PLANS APA Y3 206 NGNEEP DSUR-ORIs ucErvs A D ,� ss Ps 3.CONTRACTOR IS RESPWSBIE FOR OBTAINING ANY AND ALL LOCAL PERMITS REWIRED. KnowAmam below. DATE : c lchPs7Pr �0 4.ALL WORK SHALL BE DONE IN STRICT COMPUANC£MHM ALL APPLICABLE NATWAL•STATE,AND LOCAL CODES,STANDARDS,ORDINANCES,RULES,AND FR Call MBIORyDMtlllf. BUILDING DEPARTMENT EID-PT-1 EO RCY Ry ss�_ __ REWUTONS.ALL CONSTRUCTION MURK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE MTN ALL SAFETY OWES AP%1GBIE SAFETY CODES MEAN THE L11EST EDITION s TON,20L,5 DIGTI NI q 5 - - o __A INCLUDING ANY AND ALL AMENDMENTS,REVISIONS AND ADDITIONS THERETO,TO THE FEDERAL DEPARTEEIVT W LABOR,OCCUPATONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINIVRATW'S OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH STANDARDS(OSHA);AND APPUCABLE SAFETY,HEALTH REGULATONS AND BUILDING COMB FOR ew,am CWSTRUCOGN IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK.THE CONTRACTOR WILL SE FESP NCRE E FOR GUARDING AND PROTECTING ALL WEN EXCAVATONS IN ACCORDANCE No. FRE— Dery By P AH _ L_W SCALE:1"-250 MAD1 THE PROVISION OF SECTION 107-05(SAFETY AND HEALTH REQUIREMENTS)OF THE NYSDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS IF THE CONTACTOR PERFORMS ANY 1 BUILDING PERMIT APPUCAMON 10/28 2018 LVM kdihd ' ' � F '� NOT TO SCALE SOURCE:GOOGLE/2016 THE SITUUB CWBTRUC110N PRACTICE$Pll OPERATIONS IN Tff AFFECTED AREA$HALL BE DISWNTNDEo AND IMMEDIATE AMON SHALL BE TAKEN LO CWRECi 2. RENSEO PER VILLAGE CONSULTANTS CURRENT I-26-18 01/04/2019 -RH I ,-�I p °� OB/BD/2016 VICINITY MAP 0 THE 511UATION 70 THE SATISFACTION OF THE APPROVAL AUTHORITY HAVING JIRISOICTON. - - 6. REVISED PER Ml1ACE fON911LTANTS COMMENTS - 03/04/201A RH '"IBI24 _ 5.CONTRACTOR SHALL MANTAIN ACCESS TO ALL PROPERTIES AFFECTED BY THE SCOPE OF WORK SHORN HEREON AT ALL TIMES TO THE SARSFACTON OF ME 4. REVISED PER PLANNNG WARD.APPROVED W 03/14/2019 04 1D19 RH_ ,1maxl CANER S REPRESENTATVE.RAMPING CONSTRUCTON TO PROVIDE ACCESS MAY BE CONSTRUCTED MITI SUBBASE MATERIAL EXCEPT THAT TEMPORARY ASPHALT — --' aKumn � CONCRETE SHALL RE PLACED AS DIRECTED BY TIRE ENGINEER.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROMDING SAFE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS AT ALL TMEB. 120 BEDFORD ROAD E I I A 6.CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN THE INTEGRITY OF EXISTING PAVEMENT TO REMAIN. C-'t I I r U) SIGN TABLE Eo� o 3 �o —x—x— G4 _J ra J a �— `� �- �T EKE p,VENUE ---- ����6a�>H.,�..rTaWm�Pur� Qom ao'x3o.. eocK EEL �._D, wn-2 x I ROAN RIGHT OF WAY) III"LIK lIl K-1. wo zax+z' vELLCw cHANNEL W16-LPL NEW 3 WIDE (50, lei _ CONCRETE SIDEWALK i NEW ADA B BLACK ACCESSIBLE 30 X.30" ON STEEL W1'-2 X I - �'-E' ROUTE SIG D O 24 X12' YELLOW CHANNEL `N16-9 O I + BLACK - & STEEL I 1 `'1�II II I ` I Ex FE90ENCE 30"X3C" RED ]'-0- W3-1 X p I' 1 CHANNEL 'I vELTow ONCRET + I I I Er.WmvEW TH HAND WwrE STEEL NEW PEDESTRIAN 3o"xxo. ON cHANNEL T'-o" Rv-e k I NEW N d BON YIELD SIGN B + , ADA NEW PEDESTRIAN �I� ARKING r CROSSING SIGN�A� EW AG� NEW SELF ACCESS PARKING CLOSING MAT �A )� NEW PEDESTRIAN GATE µI w DROP CURB NEW Y o (SEE DETAIL) -PAINTED— - _ �� RELOCATE EXISTING CROSSWALK { - �' CHAIN LINK FENCE AND c REPAIR X IR AS NECESSARY - -- REMOVE 4° I ee c LARGE SHRUBS 12 6'-7'HIGH �r - PRO(OSE[; _ PROPOSED TENANT EXISTING RELOCATED 8� ' RBORVITAS- IMAGINE EARLY STOP SIGN . N�W RAI� IN S A LEARNING CENTER AN BO SPACE(4,464 S.F.) EXISTING PROPOSED GROSS t3,274 S.F. -�OUTDOQR PLAY AREA DROP OFF - PROPOSE z � n FACILITY ENTRANCE AREA V/! 6' I TAES j jl PROPOSED-OUTDOOR PLAY AREA TO BE 1 V � 1 ,•' ARBORVITAES a I�s r, 3 f' ✓l I�Q N�IESIQ(JA�Ij i,/ RAK RE OF, WITH IAVGRASS MIX N, it II II II spa P POSED NEW STOP - 3 PEDESTTiIAN AN \AHEAD SIGN FENCETO$E f_tEPA1R�D W w az CROSSING ONE WAY 6- z $ & STOP BAR - /� NSTALL SET FENCE AS REQUIRED""/ Q z Sf RELOCA I - P&OPO S70C�(PILE AREA, ' 516N�B v _ LLJ EXISTING I -,RELbCATE_fY _ �.I _-CL 4 - o zo STOP SI EOw°g LOSING GATE - k 1 CI IL ANYALTERATON OFLANS, 3x I I S % SPEC B F AAB j T„ i= _. FlCA➢DN ° �e - - ° _, i REMOVE ASPHALT TOP vR P ucTF u V -- - - , SECIDN 9"9 S E c CN Y. L COURSE AND ADD s SHIM COAT TO MEET p� wx �2 CONNECTION TRAVELWAY �� NEW GRADES + BBEDIM PERMIT APPMCATON 10/26/e6+6 LVM 20_ QUTDOOR PLAY ARE 3, aEWseo PER mace coxwLTANrs ca�1�Es o1/o%2E19-kW- --TO- N - +�24�zme / - a P 6a 2-2 26+s RN - 4l2v m»u sip<up� � xry ry v S-1 _ ___ Aevtr✓sEGknt QSmkk I I Of LLJ - ---- - I w� L J I V I I EX Rf5/OA✓CE —__ Z T CH awx m J 1 V u II'1 fX RESOfNCf Z m a Vli J - u $ I I R6YOENCf I lI II_� *Tuxo Bu <L�I Y CCIING-NI INI f p 'ir EDOENCE I� usnxc ae�.umT E }o o P AP t �Lu a _ — ECETI�,ANNA� <�m � - wm ��t ROANOKE ACNE _—T — I - z� I (fi0=1GHT f.050N0 ACC[sse�ativxwa soACFs IX. I g �p E smePeuIno-AEs `" � pfSIOFN RESIOENCEI W�LIJ C a ° n, f EA' I RESYOENCf I l Ll N._E,ENN !m o qAM��_ ❑ EA CE E aRR I �..NE : ECmNP NmN INIH wA1NN�P.,H q R��o rE mNam6aNBLE ARM N�>,NA STANDARD MA OUN � N Hot ND:> AW %—X— Ew9llxc 4 Hpl"AN LN(FENCE _ NG V � R NwNN x IN.mes a� N«,o se V _ PrB—ANCROANo �«�ATM°� Fl � " �� µF" ,-"{ •. i"' 1 4 I r�' PAwogo 2'w.oE ml TE sme IN, 1_ � �k` ����/✓� J4 x x NNGNN IN Jm� - -- "IT rtxm — Nr_w/ —EGG ,o Pur,R w —x—x— EasnNo CHAIN UNK FENCE TD BE Hw o- ti NOTES: a a MAKE REPAIRS AND/OR UPGRADES TO EXISTING WOODLAND Z r w TRAIL TO INCLUDE: W F /I 5 I \ -I _ 1) REPAIR AND/OR INSTALL NEW CHAIN LINK FENCE LE.I Q rrz E 00 W w IT. 2) NEW HANDRAILS AS NECESSARY Q W W m� Z - 3) PATH SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS NTH STONE DUST Z T_ <() m AND/OR MULCH LLJ 0- Z 0 �XZo LJ $� Q Z cn¢ Fs _j Q 0J�� 'I w a - H Hy ( I m aLTErniaN OF }PUNS 6PECFC iIC,6 9 g v s: u T ED c G N SET,ONAip9.6UBSELTIJN E. 1. BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION 10pffi/4018 LNA Q ]. RENYD PER NLLACE W NWLTANTS COMMENTS 1- -IBt6 0qG4/2019 PH OB/30/2018 0]/04/2019 PH °k 18124 -`- — �„ ^ oa/aaf2ms oa/sz/zols FIT mPu ou. r,o, ENLARGEMENT 1 =10' - N - S-2 -f f AR I, VANE RxcE Fe"NInIN�yyTFrv��TsTy¢ SIN.IF x.6 r P-E,.IGAWn0 u�0 ME`HISPAPDCElMAXC NSPA 1 -NOIE- CNc) PC.1 CAON.D - -'-- AFI-Us(9EE N0-B e) DUKE STAP 10 M 10 AIDE, AX DENIER>0 RNrtq �AN[ r iN�is N.uOYAL TON IIIfT DUMP SIRRP c{c-N�RTA H }} — 2e uNNUM RANxVD, , - t�F I�-fi �,:M - r - ♦� DEP AF EA�T SawN 1 �♦ ITTRA,+ o D.AL B� �� —�— —— -- —; _ b b1 l � aewDEEH IT PERSPECTIVE VIEW PERSPECTIVE MEW oN AS MN DER P� �.. � ENEH�AL71Nx11 ar,E&ED`a� ���. I� III III E � �TTxAT 1 n NTH ma x A aPANo N�,aa E NEAR_/ L A ND,E`°wz1 n now INmsmAAEB XIIINo ♦ ?"v,TRwnN�nTj naAEACTEB 5aL aEE oETNL x 0 s) /DUO D°R AT = oMPA< m %,FL°T°a""� PLAN MEW TBDRowbNf NINI ARE FII;pIALL II DN NAPB RONwi SO IF ADAN ti DrE e>E m N� - - RDz a SECTION UP ALT _ 1 V I'LL III SECTION NB,s BAG DETAIL NE-PAN 11 ROOM .1 SANE 11.ON ITAVTic 5 POSEN EON ALL LENPORARY SOIL sioa:PN s III eE om AIR HI-FLOW 4LT SACK AS MANUFACTURED BY _ s ITu NIME n5 eA sTA A s sN�1UELAT ONEII TYPE CxYHIA wJ O.e05rs - TRABEEA c, � - ACF ENNRONMENTAL OR APPROKD EOUA® INSTALLA70N DETAIL .= ZI HAO - 1N NEE SEALED E I, ALL STD„ISHED sox SHALL NOT^DNTA II SLIDES CNEATEN THAN2I. (FOR A111111 - - AND PROATERUPTE BI Ds wN RE rvEN ELTEe%MNAN Oar,SiABI IRnY REL Pt NSA LJUNVOT DI,Ancu N b E nD fENc A E K AESH CRN Ns Ell PIAVPp BY % A cIOU I.BEFLE,I ARAsMIA BE DBE Rnq L BE wPtto.vuhENN^LaTx I. BE FILE, ELIEN x M RAE'oox,snaLNNA PUNTED Du ATE ILL NR FIFTY xluT-I A EQUAL 1,PR EAR seAA eE acaAE,aleRawcE,m IIIIISED EwnL _ _ - P xi x..E oP N.INN IIANIE,OR APP DAz E I.L. DEB AND P—AL IERIBRI.1 IIILACED N'xex -HE PaIMELEN._ L DE egoTECTEo rnT,t sLT EENCInc TN_TULeD APouND IIPPARUNT Nc szE eDLsesDFP E IT E c - DSAyuw/ca ET Al. 1111 11 FIX-1 SILT FENCE 1 TEMPORARY SOIL STOCKPILE NTH SILT FENCE 2 SILT SACK 3 NOTES: 1/2•RADIUS� OR SECPE _ 1 DOE LH EXPANSION BITUMINOUS EXPANSION SEE PLANS; E ( He OexAt+- - 1 IN BH J G 2 INSTALLED THE PC AND ET cAAOE DSCE PLANST —�� r'RADIUS TWIT OF ALL RACws cua6 _____—-- _ DONTRADToICAL) �JDINT(SEE NOTE e) I. L — } a G III — I �o EL NlE9S DIRECTED OTHERWISE �� ANTION JOINTS SHALL ALSO BE = _ �� _ Pf DUOLOED EXPANSION EACH EXPANSION JC IF SiAIL BE LEFT AVEAIENT w W tt Z 4 EXPOSED AND NET COVERED WITH A SIR I c'M. - .TD—g 11.1_E uALLj }Y 'h COAT OF ONSTRETE. 1 W D eL'uux NIL ARI H 5-0' Z U m 4. NSTAIL CONSTRUE, JOINTS MD Y E DTP O BETWEEN EXPANS UN JOINTS 90 THAT LENGTH }' (c F wOR6vs 2A@]J - OF ALL RI SEGMENT WILL BE lEA()fEE Mu. (4 Mx7 I= o y 5. LENGTH OF CURB SEGMENTS AT CLOSURES sw.°re+o srvw wx 4 s NAY BE VARIED BUT SHALL NOT BE LESS @ 1/4° CLASS A CONCRETE D 5 5' P U p Z Z ED (4,DOD PSI yj TFAV FOI,R l4J FEET. ) MILp1"rypn'°`"w` SEE VI/D CHART N Q w l � 3 8. CONC INSTALLED ADJACENT is SIDEWALK N OR APPROVED COMPACTED _ O W J CONCRETE PAVEMENT,MATCH E%PANSCN JOINTS. SU@GRADE J Tn iwT, NFATAIx mm m E>s ao� u °. J �m PLAN ELEVATION N.—s A Z — L�A g o a ?' BR ND , �E ND DEIECIaeLI No;�N;FA EL1 AA D5 CAST—IN—PLACE CONCRETE CURB 4 STEEL PIPE RAILING FOR RAMP 6 1/2"RADIUS — AFTECAFT ON CF PLANE NE �� RNISHED GRAD:iO BE VI 'THICK CLASSA s EARIS- ,T"0 E°s FWSH WITH SIDEWA. SEE IS, BBIG9 CONCRETE(4.000 P91) \ K'At CTEUSLD IINFEESIONAL -kANEERO CINFECLA"ND IV 7 \ `\ 1\ / -/ 1_ o so 7oP of Cu3B ^' e °- D' >??v`� T , iYT \�� PACLED swE DA e \ 'orz L.... A EK:NT c .oN xrsooT IEM Am,maa wBoRAOE v Fb N ,Tar 6"THICK a a"ceumED sravE BASF ` @ s SECTION A—A / \ ` APPROVED COMPACTED 4- 1'R /-TOP OF PAVEMENT �� SECTION A—A �su@cRADE g — —— I° vnB..F1Aae11c WELDED FBI u.�iD ax z A PAVEMENT x ' NOIEE'. NLY coAcrD NEULNE. RS TO \\ AS NETT sE 1. SIDEWALK CROSS SLOPE SHALL BE 1R MIN-TO 2%MAX. 5 Ill YE, DUE Em TER 1U11Rs REFER I \ \ TAIL ATEN TYPE eF Dm Jv¢rexs ANE mxArvM 2 PRONDE 1/2°?REMOLDED E%PANSAN JDINPS AT 2D' AFFLISIII. I" EXPANSION JCIAT TH dxEaEs uOOArtD RE Kx/IR INT:Rt ALS JNLEGS OTHERWISE DIRECTED, 1 \ THAT HET 3.REINFORCING SHALL NET EXTEND RIROUGH "ALL AH LYM NEW YaAR STATE EA `ENsn OWRSE EXPANS ON JOINTS. DOORDSFN. IH E KxvDK _AST T NOT TO EG4E_ _ DEFAA.,NT¢TRA gI". \ -x N xs IABE. E REFUDDIAED 4, SIDEYALK SHALL LAVE LIGH-BROOM FINIS, UAL ° D3/c4/201R 5r NOAIN B.c0x1RAR0A 10 ENSDK tOP OrOr C®nATa6 SLaC tr FAIL. w UIB4 N4NO. CONCRETE CURB ENDING 5 PAVEMENT RESURFACING 7 CONCRETE SIDEWALK AND RAMP 8 DROP CURB & RAMP (TYPE A) 9 Dac-900 ll 11 1 12 12 a'WOE nHltE uwE(eoTH eDEs) A m - EEGE OF ROADWAY - f -- (WHEN APPLICABLE) mDEcncx POsi Wn1 CURB/PAMT - AaFs. PASIX (vE BE aAxs) 18'0.C. WNt E£xOTFs 4Pk A! P NEED r B 9 ; „x s FINES YM(Y LlCTi1L/WYffJ ¢ I m� § Ypt� 12'WIDE WM17 LINE d� £a reB/PAxT L. I Ya° (S¢NE wM's) G D, TDxGaS STRIPING END ENLARGEMENT 11 PEDESTRIAN CROSSING 13 - REQU NaA S MNKNCSREAC£TREE LETAL) BILMAEMLNY OCTAL 1. ABEEDED SURFACE Nttt SASSTO NTLY LONGER RE IN 1ISOx 1A111 T - X E GRISSMIT PAxTEO SITE mABSMATULLED CR[cnoHOxiO PAINED xHIE NEWLY INSTALLED%RF. y B REMEN B DE ACCESSIBLE PARING BPADBE ND AGGEBB AISLES IDRDBB HAT HED REA L 1 m z I RAAGNTTDAGGEgaBLEPARKxG'AGE) H�LBEMGEFRDMmEGENERLLNEDFTHEMARKIxGB DP DE RA G ANIN N %GEED 3OR IN ANY DIRECnON ExC BOREPaP�O ETgx G S DIl FlED ANS DNAL TOLERANCES N CCN-LoO.N � SEEDBED GRASS SEED MEAEUREO Wm A 3 FOOT SMART LEVEL AS OMENS CAN BE SOYM ffOR OR AxD FDR sBRFGE AccesseLTr BY Nx,ED STATES Access BDARD LATEST EDnox _ MESA 3.cRWIAREI ND SURFACEARES FOR AIC'S.LE PARKNG'ADCs AND ACCESS Al—BERNNG THEM SHALL BE -INBEALLATON.ERRED AN PRRINC SPACES ME I R.ITANT.ACCEss AIBLES SHALL BE AT mE SAME LEVEL As mE ACCESSIBLE C As xareMAii�uE E(6M 70 AWW fn7 MEM9NT M4011 6 SEE SITE Puxs/sal TABLE IN GIN DESlaunaws,LocgnoNs AND"'T"'AnONS. INc EDIT DETAIL FOR CONCRETE FTLLED STEEL PROPECnoN FIT 11 ACCESSIBLE uo>Es.' To TH P RKING LA IC ESIGN GEAR . SYMBOL SHALL BE THEMOPusnC TYPE OR"ITEO WTH STENCIL PLAYGROUND. ACCESSIBLE PARKING 10 PAINTED ACCESSIBLE SYMBOL 12 GRASSMAT � 114 PAVEMENT TEXT & ARROWS 15 ON-SITE SIGN PEST 6"POLYN CHLORIDE CONCUIT IF LESS TIAN 3/4" (PVC)SCHEDULE 40 5/16-E CALVASEED DNC O USE 2N6&6m HOLES vT x z.L GRADE s HEX HEAD o INSTEAD OF 1ST sm _J eoLrs a FLAT wgsHFIR O, rRure HEX HEAP GALVANIZED BOLT,NUT A A Q J FIR HOLE 0 g AN HEAVY putt LOCKWASHER AMPTI— K w} o (OR AN INTEGRAL FLANGED LOCKNUT) 1g LLJ Q L,o z v noE wE IF LESS THAN 3/4" o L J xxs. w LLl a usE 2ND sm HOLE' o �17 s}- IPd wuTM=}da INSTEAD OF 11T k 5m j4 a �. cE NRLL P P' Z W p ITOT/1s'IDID .D.x t"D.D.x s/B"THICK `.t^ xo MORE Q - AIL O Q U z I"�YOP UNTHREADED ANC-PLATED SPACER TS, wux a Au RE HIw DB'MDE BASE POST E�EIR BAu,i E" nemE..AALL Z H i e PLAN Er B"afro �nGxsaro U o z z o `R § CHANNEL TRAFFIC SIGN POST IN PAVED AREAS MRHED �Dl Y w ' +gam � OVERLAP ENLARGEMENT GRl / a g A .aM� t-s 6' slcN FACE ForeNpHm GKAOE — ASIL O LdMY (SEE mAFl=1c SIGN TABLE) sLO i/ ni i (n O UP GALVANIZED STEEL BOLTS ME AxO OEPTn sxo (Z CLBE RRHOMM Cr I� W LOCK WASHERS AND BREAKAWAY sL \ \ \ / \// E�@Ar A SMe¢ NUTS 5/15"DIA. SIGN POST 1 y\ �/ \\� ��/t� ❑ m PS R%-E Emwmnau 3-1 2" 7-0'MIN. YYY�\\\�\y%\//\l✓" ` sD mL U gn CHANNEL�B Pvc III v ��v`�..'ASOL ANYALTBRATON OFRANB, €:n CROSS SECLION ADJACENT BITUMINOUS 11 2"UGHRY TAMPEp C01➢PATCH SPBGEICASIONS PIATSAND 1 S OR CONCRETE PAYED 1 III OR CONCRETE W TO WJLCNIxG�UGNRY iANP SY N10Esi BpLLx FDR SHRUB PLATHIS ox 'PEPOP-S BEARIN<mE SEAL POTENTIAL Z-BAR SURFACE 1 (MATERIAL 10 MATCH ADJACENT TH R TOALL NB OFJCIA n).! STRINGER LOCATONS pAVEO SURFACE) eRL ESm a.m xoG ENGI N CNN­ xxE RWnNTHR (SEE NOTE 1) As pNTMAGRRUED EUN SEL`iION NEVI x THE—111 6L O � D 64 _ IIII AEA— U.StALSTO TMEx UM`C MOCTss s o NIA M4 Y IIII RE BLLRFSTSTM VO KS EJUCAT ON " p,sMM i ' POST SHALL BE FLAT BACK 11 W[�ppilNB 0A E%C 6 RODECCF BY GALVANIZED STEEL CHANNEL b u CTCM1 TW9 SUPSEGTI012 Sig (R LB/FT)HAYENG 3/er'DIA, saL ` NOTES 1'ON CENTER LEP mROUGBOUT FULL UENGTH SEE CHANNEL OVERLAP � _ xCN �ey.e..er�rtnw ENLARGEMENT FOR DETAIL CUR � ^ ..� O ...e.^ B O E EDS _ 3 4 CRUSHED ST N BASE OR/ SUBBASE s . FINISHED GRADE NSTAuanON OF RuxTs °uOWxc SUBBASE COURSE 1YPE 1 BASE POBi (MATERIAL TD MATCH SURROUNpING �ptgryry^rysCONiAN[Rs MusT HAK THE HBRWS �C'0 ND1E, `3111 31 Ly II IIII�¶ SUBBASE MATERIAL) R"C"PUum A'.T. IN m - SECTION A-A ROEDR D LANT xATEPAL B LL EA BD E 1, WHEN BACK TO BACK SIGNS ARE DESIGNATED IIII-\ FLATpN TO Fx SHED GRACE ASRi E ."s eawmvv,cmrem.yu�rmn o. D P •xw.a s.a�.a wsw.00a n TO PREMOUS IXSTINO GRACE To SHARE DNE POST,REcws SHALL BE - TRAFFIC SIGN POST IN PAVED AREAS ra "MmN..LNI AFFIXED TO POST USING ALUMINUM OR " U vies .Mzan imm>.u�mr -. -\- -rroT ro scAiE STNNLESS STEEL Z-BAR STRINGER. m/%/2019 18124 SHRUB PLANTING F16 TRAFFIC SIGN POST (BREAKAWAY STEEL CHANNEL) F1 SHRUB PLANTING 18 Rc—soy - ' BOWMAN AVEN - - g! .� I : •"---` ,: �`;�i�—w<-- _ -�- -- 'tea` _;— i �''� g'' —� � I i a, f G' I KEY MAP k 6 r so: I ALT4 ACSM LAND� . I 4„ TITLE SURVEY LEGEND 0 i { r I II IIII :::::p III U AI a I , — 7 y a 1 : W f : R RANKLIN STREET - t AA � III i I I — rAE-rr � o _ �� �I `� ABBREVIATIONS o, y •� '°d- ,� __ i k �III i a -- WE AVENUE � ..„,,;r � ,;�� : ,�,:r r', z NDALE > -I� EXCEPTIONS TO TITLE, � E UE ss I: NOTES& EFERENCES R — —— -- I 0 t- I F, 6 FIIE COPY SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATENOUN o , ^,I - - .ice- CRESCENT PLACE 1 I , z ��ALTA-1 „m _e BOWMAN AVENUE z MAP REFERENCES: �I ,o oo'a I «a. .mot— e r Ev nimi\ ZONING INTERPRETATION S II a' Iu I re. II I. PARKING SPACE COUNT I i s f aaeime.um'+n- 111 ao. re urnm,c 91 a re�nm e,rn�=, ;.I _ I s FRANKLIN ---� � STREET s ry �. i E t � r � I n I o 0 i i oR vs 7 r I N 1 1 a — ,r I m� _ I j � a aK P I W — — �,ES ,.... - Fl re N F WE N_IEW AVENUE ,«F 5 r L � � o D _—_ to — •❑I wsn, .� � Y i nr' u so' o r I z E A� AVENUE LLEN c LEGAL DESCRIP110N 14 RYE RIDGE PLAZA(PARCEL A) '.,GALE - Z, II v Y I j x LEGAL DEGCRIPTON 111 RYE RIDGE 11- (PARCEL r : r I o- � LEGAL DESCRIPTON 20G EW RIDGE STREET(PARCEL C) ---- m PaP EL °u J L I �y aV N L Y CENT _ T PLACE N CRES n,o I E C a A�E pp I � �z .,. w.reau re re�..rere