Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBP22-028PERMIT # /����' ��� DATE: � a� ExP: � a a 3 SECTION � � � � � _B/LOC LOT � �� TYPE OF WORK � �OU✓�' /�7 � �,C !,�/�i'1'IP.r77�� �C7���/�C'� � �� JOB LOCATI N � � � n� p �C� OWNER O /�" � � Gt�c�' � --- c�_---C3 3�� CONTRALTO �'e/IQ a•-��c�� — _ i,��� � ��.�� (9/y�9��o-- /9 EST. COST � -"'�/� �� FEE � -' f� 30�Y � D ✓CO # FEE �` o����-" DATIz % TCO # FEE DATE _- ____�-�.� INSPECTION RECORD DATE FOOTI N G FOUNDATION FRAMING RGH FRAMING INSULATION PLUMBING 0 I NSP RGH PLUMBIN GAS � 1 'L �. ��_� . SPRINKLER ELECTRIC � 'ram "cam ��T � - LOW -VOLT � _ ��..�. ALARM AS BUILT � � � FINAL �%-iHER APPROVgLS ARB ��u �� �/ BOT PB ,� ZBA �- OTHER �►S-I�UiLT/FINAL S�IRVEY REQIII�iED PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTION VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK WESTCHESTER COUNTY, NEW YORK N0: 22- 164 Certificate of Occupancy Zhis is to certify that n bey- 1 LID I j I V, of, �I having duly filed an application on L1(J b i'^ IS. 20 a requesting a Certificate of Occupancy for the premises known as, /to 3i rc La ae , Rye Brook,NY, located in a Zoning District and shown on the most current Tax Map as Section: 135. Block: / Lot: 5• and having fully complied with the requirements of the Building Code and the Zoning Ordinance under Building Permit No. , issued y5 01 .�2 20a, such authority and permission is hereby granted to the property owner to lawfully occupy or use said premises or building or part thereof listed under the following New York State Classifications, Use: �-� C / Construction: for the following purposes: wn n/ deo Subject to all the privileges, requirements, limitations, and conditions prescribed by law, and subject also to the following: This certificate does not in any way relieve the owners or any person or persons in possession or control of the premises, building,or any part thereof from obtaining such other permits or licenses as may be prescribed by law for the uses or purposes for which the building or premises is designed or intended. Furthermore, it does not relieve such owners or persons from complying with any lawful order issued with the object of maintaining the premises or building in a safe and lawful condition. No changes or rearrangement in the structural parts of the building or in the exit facilities shall be made,and no enlargement, whether by extending on any side or by increasing in height sh 11 be ma 1 the building be moved from one location to another until a permit to accomplish such change has b e fro the Buil g Inspector. Da Building Inspector,Village of Rye Brook: te: NOV — 12022 4U,-,,- Gt� aW VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK MAYOR 938 King Street, Rye Brook,N.Y. 10573 ADMINISTRATOR Jason A. Klein (914) 939-0668 Christopher J. Bradbury wwR,,ryeb roo k.org TRUSTEES BUILDING& FIRE INSPECTOR Susan R. Epstein Michael J. Izzo Stephanie J. Fischer David M. Heiser Salvatore W. Morlino CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE November 1,2022 Robert Wilk&Haley Wilk 16 Birch Lane Rye Brook,New York 10573 Re: 16 Birch Lane,Rye Brook,New York 10573 Parcel ID#: 135.43-1-5.28 This document certifies that the work done under Mechanical Permit #22-089 issued on 5/31/2022 for the installation of a 500 gallon under-ground propane tank has been satisfactorily completed. Sincerely, Michael J. Izzo Building&Fire Inspector /to BUILDING DEPARTMENT For office use only: OCT 18 2022 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK PERMIT# e)-C�"W ISSUED: 3 0—a� VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK 38 KING STREET,RYE BROOK,NEw YORK 10573 DATE: /0-P?-44 BUILDING DEPARTMErJT (914)939-0668 FEE:A 135— PAfD.N www.rvebrook.org APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY,CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE, AND CERTIFICATION OF FINAL COSTS TO BE SUBMITTED ONLY UPON COMPLETION OF ALL WORK, AND PRIOR TO THE FINAL INSPECTION ftff#ftf►ttttf#########f#ff►►tftttt►•tttt►ttt#f#f#t#ffff#ft#tt#ftf#f#►t■•t►►■1►t►►t###ft#t##f#ff#f#►f####ft#####fftftt■#►ttt♦ Address: I l0 PJ 1 f Cb �_a Y oo I n�- Occupancy/Use: )C,41� Parcel ID#: 36, Y 3 -�- �, a Zone: /P V S Owner: all 1`K Address: j�R Yj1r C" Ln , ��1�, ZvOOK_ ,W\.i IIW�l P.E./R.A.or Contractor: At-0-n a)f( ff QC-"J)X Address: lb2- Pew( `�;t t?0(+Cbe5-.�', Person in responsible charge: NC'cle ,r t 4,4foY1C� AddressQs Pod noyn k ,, (UN IN 12u lq Application is hereby made and submitted to the Building Inspector of the Village of Rye Brook for the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy/Certificate of Compliance for the structure/construction/alteration herein mentioned in accordance with law: STATE OF NEW YORK,COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER as: L' 1 O fY12C11 C, ICY Q�Q being duly swom,deposes and says that he/she resides at (p� Paul Horn RA (Print Name of Applicant) (No.and Street) �/ in C, aA SK i 11 ,in the County of �j r�� in the State of N 1 that (City"FmA n Village) he/she has supervised the work at the location indicated above,and that the actual total cost of the work,including all site improvements, labor,materials,scaffolding,fixed equipment,professional fees,and including the monetary value of any materials and labor which may have been donated gratis was:S t o for the construction or alteration of. An. i, ' lEA f 6()p I DRA 1 al P L dh Deponent further states that he/she has examined the approved plans of the structure/work herein referred to for which a Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance is sought,and that to the best of his/her knowledge and belief,the structure/work has been erected/completed in accordance with the approved plans and any amendments thereto except in so far as variations therefore have been legally authorized,and as erected/completed complies with the laws governing building construction.Deponent further understands that it shall be unlawful for an owner to use or permit the use of any building or premises or part thereof hereafter created,erected,changed,converted or enlarged,wholly or partly,in its use or structure until a Certificate of Occupancy or Certificate of Compliance shall have been duly issued by the Building Inspector as per§250-10.A.of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook. Sworn ` Sworn to before me this 1 \ Sworn to before me this �© day of r� , 20a� day of L� EM/v/Z , 20,,-2- Signature of Property Owner t na ure t Ap cant v")\ ► Pc (Rqt Name of Prope Owner Printant Notary Public SHARI M LILLO No L ARENA Notary Public,State of New York NOTARY P LIC-STATE OF NEW YORK-:,­ No.DIME6160063 Qualified In Westchester County �.- No.01AR5084256 Commission Expires January 29,20 Qualified In Westchester County MY Commission Expires 09.02.20e,,2 QyE BRa? BUILDING DEPARTMENT ❑ ILDING INSPECTOR SSISTANT BUILDING INSPECTOR VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK ❑CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER 938 KING STREET • RYE BROOK,NY 10573 (914) 939-0668 FAx (914) 939-5801 www ryebrook.org - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INSPECTION REPORT - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ADDRESS : 1 ��� �r A C�-�- DATE: I 0 3 t ��. PERMIT# �O C ISSUED: ECT: \35 y LOCK: I LOT: -421 LOCATION: 1 N (-UU ) 00` 9cili OCCUPANCY: ❑ VIOLATION NOTED THE WORK IS... ACCEPTED ❑ REJECTED/REINSPECTION ❑ SITE INSPECTION REQUIkM ❑ FOOTING ❑ FOOTING DRAINAGE ❑ FOUNDATION ❑ UNDERGROUND PLUMBING NOTES ON INSPECTION: ❑ ROUGH PLUMBING ❑ ROUGH FRAMING ❑ INSULATION ❑ NATURAL GAS LiC li y Eti1� l t G,.1 p L.P. GAS ❑ FUEL TANK ❑ FIRE SPRINKLER ❑ FINAL PLUMBING ❑ CROSS CONNECTION FINAL ❑ OTHER QyE I3RC��. cu � Fo 1932 BUILDING DEPARTMENT ❑BUILDING INSPECTOR ❑ASSISTANT BUILDING INSPECTOR VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK ❑CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER 938 KING STREET • RYE BROOK,NY 10573 (914) 939-0668 FAx (914) 939-5801 www.ryebrook.or8 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INSPECTION REPORT - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ADDRESS : 1 1 �C Y� l�C,(�E' DATE: PERMIT# t �� U Cf? t 1 ISSUED: SECT: 1� $LOCK: LOT: t LOCATION: �Z �\� SW `� �� 1 ( � OCCUPANCY: `U ❑ VIOLATION NOTED" THE WORK IS... ❑ ACCEPTED REJECTED/REINSPECTION 11 ❑ SITE INSPECTION REQUIRED ❑ FOOTING ❑ FOOTING DRAINAGE ❑ FOUNDATION ❑ UNDERGROUND PLUMBING NOTES ON INSPECTION: ❑ ROUGH PLUMBING ❑ ROUGH FRAMING ❑ INSULATION ; ❑ NATURAL GAS ) C/ ►CSC. �'en� �xt cR ' v ❑ L.P. GAS ❑ FUEL TANK ❑ FIRE SPRINKLER /�� \l5[�� C (3 �Q ❑ FINAL PLUMBING E3 ❑ CROSS CONNECTION FINAL ❑ OTHER QyE BRC�v�. ,9a2 BUILDING DEPARTMENT ❑BUILDING INSPECTOR XSSISTANT BUILDING INSPECTOR VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK ❑CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER 938 KING STREET • RYE BROOK,NY 10573 (914) 939-0668 FAx (914) 939-5801 www ryebrook.org - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INSPECTION REPORT - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ADDRESS :— ' �J '( ` LCk 1� ��a( DATE• �w PERMIT# V ➢� ISSUED: SECT: BLOCK: LOT: LOCATION: `" OCCUPANCY: �, J VIOLATION NOTED THE WORK Is... ElACCEPTED REJECTED/ REINSPECTION ❑ SITE INSPECTION / REQUIRED ❑ FOOTING ❑ FOOTING DRAINAGE ❑ FOUNDATION ❑ UNDERGROUND PLUMBING NOTES ON INSPECTION: ❑ ROUGH PLUMBING ❑ ROUGH FRAMING ❑ INSULATION CQ�� ❑ NATURAL GAS ❑ L.P. GAS ❑ FUEL TANK n ❑ FIRE SPRINKLER v` 1� A cx �� 1 ok ❑ FINAL PLUMBING ❑ CROSS CONNECTION ❑ FINAL �/ 1 �] OTHER n �c' -3RC�v�, 1982 BUILDING DEPARTMENT BUILDING INSPECTOR d ASSISTANT BUILDING INSPECTOR VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK t ❑CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER 938 KING STREET • RYE BROOK,NY 10573 (914) 939-0668 FAx (914) 939-5801 www ryebrook.org - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INSPECTION REPORT - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ADDRESS :— I � l LC - �'V �C� DATE: PERMIT# �* 7_-2 - C�Z� ISSUED:*��ECT: l i LOCK: ` LOT: LOCATION:-ro'- - yAax' (.,_W w��tr N C� »� OCCUPANCY: ('J ❑ VIOLATION NOTED THE WORK IS... ❑ ACCEPTED REJECTED/ REINSPECTION ❑'' SITE INSPECTION REQUIRED ❑ FOOTING ❑ FOOTING DRAINAGE ❑ FOUNDATION ❑ UNDERGROUND PLUMBING NOTES ON INSPECTION: ❑ ROUGH PLUMBING ❑ ROUGH FRAMING ❑ INSULATION - ❑ NATURAL GAS ❑ L.P. GAS ❑ FUEL TANK ❑ FIRE SPRINKLER ❑ FINAL PLUMBING ❑ CROSS CONNECTION ❑ FINAL ❑ OTHER QyE 4Rnv',�. 1932 BUILDING DEPARTMENT BUILDING INSPECTOR ASSISTANT BUILDING INSPECTOR VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER 938 KING STREET • RYE BROOK,NY 10573 (914) 939-0668 FAx (914) 939-5801 www.ryebrook.org - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INSPECTION REPORT - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ADDRESS: (o (Z G `'�J `�L DATE: 7 Z Z- PERMIT#C>P'-2 Z_ - ISSUED: 2 SECT: S' BLOCK:_LOT:S� LOCATION: 12�F)�' OCCUPANCY: ❑ VIOLATION NOTED THE WORK IS... ❑ ACCEPTEDYFbRyxc*EW REINSPECTION 4 SITE INSPECTION REQUIRED f/❑ FOOTING ❑ FOOTING DRAINAGE ❑ FOUNDATION ❑ UNDERGROUND PLUMBING NOTES ON INSPECTION: ❑ ROUGH PLUMBING ❑ ROUGH FRAMING ❑ INSULATION ❑ NATURAL GAS ❑ L.P. GAS ❑ FUEL TANK /��� ❑ FIRE SPRINKLER ❑ FINAL PLUMBING ❑ CROSS CONNECTION ❑ FINAL ❑ OTHER w A_�LA F�4 .t Bkj . O tim 1982 BUILDING DEPARTMENT UILDING INSPECTOR ASSISTANT BUILDING INSPECTOR VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK ❑CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER 938 KING STREET • RYE BROOK,NY 10573 (914) 939-0668 FAx (914) 939-5801 www Uebrook.org - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INSPECTION REPORT - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ADDRESS : 1 6 `� iL�-�' - DATE: L4 ( -Z �Z PERMIT# r ISSUED: SECT: BLOCK: LOT: LOCATION: <�- l t `� l M S� L\ « OCCUPANCY: [],.,VIOLATION NOTED THE WORK IS... ACCEPTED ❑ REJECTED/REINSPECTION SITE INSPECTION REQUIRED ❑ FOOTING ❑ FOOTING DRAINAGE ❑ FOUNDATION ❑ UNDERGROUND PLUMBING NOTES ON INSPECTION: ❑ ROUGH PLUMBING ❑ ROUGH FRAMING ❑ INSULATION `,, ❑ NATURAL GAS T, "V�JCI-i ❑ L.P. GAS 2\3 �� ❑ FUEL TANK ❑ FIRE SPRINKLER ❑ FINAL PLUMBING ❑ CROSS CONNECTION ❑ FINAL ❑ OTHER oe BROtk >>/�' 19t�2•'��O BUILDING DEPARTMENT UILDING INSPECTOR ASSISTANT BUILDING INSPECTOR VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK J❑CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER 938 KING STREET • RYE BROOK,NY 10573 lI (914) 939-0668 FAx (914) 939-5801 www ryebrook.org - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INSPECTION REPORT - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ADDRESS : v `(�/� DATE: (o It L L z PERMIT# ISSUED: / SECT: BLOCK: LOT: LOCATION: OCCUPANCY: Z I1-D ❑ VIOLATION NOTED THE WORK IS... /Q ACCEPTED ❑ REJECTED/REINSPECTION ❑ SITE INSPECTION REQUIRED ❑ FOOTING ❑ FOOTING DRAINAGE ❑ FOUNDATION ❑ UNDERGROUND PLUMBING NOTES ON INSPECTION: ❑ ROUGH PLUMBING ❑ ROUGH FRAMING ❑ INSULATION r ❑ NATURAL GAS L.P. GAS ❑ FUEL TANK ❑ FIRE SPRINKLER ❑ FINAL PLUMBING ❑ CROSS CONNECTION ❑ FINAL ❑ OTHER 00 e' N \ N W � � � ■ # vi O ar MM W vp va �� � y o o NO lz 4.1 V W lox � y mv no tp L ZLn �, Q \ voA0 000 A F� o 3 " � a " W W Z Ofj `°J U-1 � N Ir n GG a+ en 1* f V H O, a� 06 i = O s A6 co (� O Q z U Q A U Z z ■ W � � w � � � Z ^ W � r o � Ca a � N ON e b N O Iwl �i W x V U ad ° o � ba o � r✓ r h o u�i 1 ci Ad U 0Ng y W JAW 0 o V agb � ►`� aa, u. w Z W W 0 � .� v z x 0-4 0.4 R-s BUILDING DEPARTMENT E DEC 1 5 2020 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOKRIQJA - 4 2021 938 KING STREET RYE BROOK,NY 10573 ENOV12 2020 (914}939-0668 FAX(914)939-5801 www.gebrook.org VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK BUILDING DEPARTMENT FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: A PP �roval Dat it# / "t+� Application# � Approval Signature: ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD: Disapproved: Date: MAY 1 2021 BOT Approval Date: Case# Chairman: PB Approval Date: 13 Case# Secretary: J r, C- ZBA Approval Date: Li Z 1 Case# Z DC3 Other: Application Fee: Permit Fees: I/ Z EXTERIOR BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION Application dated: I I%U0 is hereby made to the Building Inspector of the Village of Rye Brook,NY,for the issuance of a Permit for the construction of buildings,structures,additions,alterations or for a change in use,as per detailed statement described below. l. lobAddress: E 2. Parcel lD#: t 65 .43-1-5.2� Zone: - 3. Proposed Improvement(Describe in detail): to - --'3 4 1 4. Property Owner:-0cee-Z71 O A� WIL 4 Address: �6 116%Q0A LNE E ZQWK, Phone# - -7 Cell# e-mail iABL"SWI LV- (P yAHW'« List All Other Properties Owned in Rye Brook: Applicant:-[ppILIl E;L Address:n Phone# `�{N- aly-"q Cell#q1,4-'1m-Q e-mail CM6@ L"Jo5cme en-4N%4•cC� Architect: � .I11r3. `�r11� Address: Of Phone# " Cell# e-mail to Engineer: -P Cj Address: I Phone# Cell# - -� e-mail C-k^t S cl'l 't S --J> A-.`�S General Contractor: r�2 O rQ �_' "1;1 C Address: Ql' h 7�� © p`-r/' 4ee A)J�/ 0S 3 Phone# /J/r.. 9= a-� 35S Cell#9141' 04—//pO 1�--- e-mail (1} 3121/19 5. Occupancy;(1-Fam.,2-Fam.,Commercial.,etc...)Pre-construction: " � � Post-construction: 6. Area of lot: Square feet: a 1 .q Acres: . 5 7. Dimensions from proposed building or structure to lot lines: front yard: rear yard: right side yard: left side yard: other: 8. If building is located on a comer lot,which street does it front on: 9. Area of proposed building in square feet: Basement: f n fl: 2nd fl: 3'fl: 10. Total Square Footage of the proposed new construction: 11. For additions,total square footage added:Basement: 1 g'fl: 2nd fl: 3`d fl: 12, Total Square Footage of the proposed renovation to the existing structure: 13. N.Y.State Construction Classification: N.Y.State Use Classification: 14. Number of stories: Overall Height: Median Height: 15. Basement to be full,or partial: finished or unfinished: 16. What material is the exterior finish: 17. Roof style;peaked,hip,mansard,shed,etc: Roofing material: 18. What system of heating: 19. If private sewage disposal is necessary,approval by the Westchester County Health Department must be submitted with this application. 20. Will the proposed project require the installation of a new,or an extension/modification to an existing automatic fire suppression system?(Fire Sprinkler,ANSL System,FM-200 System,Type I Hood,etc...) Yes: No:__X_ (f yes,applicant must submit a separate Automatic Fire Suppression Svstem Permit application&2 sets of detailed engineered plans) 2 L Will the proposed project disturb 400 sq.ft.or more of land,or create 400 sq. ft.or more of impervious coverage requiring a Stormwater Management Control Permit as per§217 of Village Code? Yes: X No: Area: 22. Will the proposed project require a Site Plan Review by the Village Planning Board as per§209 of Village Code? Yes: NO:_,_,K_ (if yes,applicant must submit a Site Plan Application,&provide detailed drawings) 23. Will the proposed project require a Steep Slopes Permit as per§213 of Village Code Yes: No: X _ (tfyes,you must submit a Site Plan Application,&provide a detailed topographical survey) 24. Is the lot located within 100 ft.of Wetland as per§245 of Village Code? Yes: No: (if yes,the area of wetland and the wetland buffer zone must be properly depicted on the survey&sile plan) 25. Is the lot or any portion thereof located in a Flood Plane as per the FIRM Map dated 9/28/07? Yes: No: Je (tfyes,the area and elevations of the,hood plane must be property depicted on the survey&site plan) 26. Will the proposed project require a Tree Removal Permit as per§235 of Village Code? Yes: No: (if yes,applicant must submit a Tree Removal Permit Application) 27, Does the proposed project involve a Home-Occupation as per§250-38 of Village Code? Yes: No: Indicate: TIER I: TIER II: TIER HE (if yes,a Horne Occupation Permit Application is required) 28. List all zoning variances granted or denied for the subject property: 29. What is the total estimated cost of construction: S ?0. 2�' Note:The estimated cost shall include all site improvements,labor,material,scaffolding,fixed equipment,professional fees,including any material and labor which may be donated gratis.If the final cost exceeds the estimated cost,an additional fee will be required prior to issuance of the CIO. 30. Estimated date of completion: FALL W)2j (2) 3/21/19 Bl u.m.N(: Dt.rAIt'l NIEN'1 _-- V RE ISE� P�� 'ATR*- 4 2021 , +l t It, !t ti� ;;, �� DEC 16 2020 AP IN 1 RESIDENTIAL LOT AREA COVERAGE Addre«• P)kc to k..E�►..lE Sviti iun: 1--2�5 N� Block: ' I ,,i_ .f, 7-'i-S — PERMITTED COVERAGE RATIOS IN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS Local Law 3-88 YOUR ZONE AREA IN MA;N ACCESS DECK ZONE. DISTRICT SO =EFT BLDG BLDG MAX 'CHECK) MAX R-35 35 00C 1400 46,0 5% R 2 ° 25 00C -4'0 3 5 4% R-2, 20.000 3 51'" 4% R-15 15.000 16% 3 5% 4% R-'5A 15 COC 12% 3 501° 4% R-'2 12 50C '7c,b 4% 4",0 R-1 C 10 00C 200k 4 5 3 5rit R-7 7.50,_ 233/o 4 5°�0 3 5% R-5 5.000 30% 5'0 3 5% R-2a 5.000 30% 5°. 3.5% Existin Proposed: 1. AREA OF LOT 1 ,` i5(v q Sc F! - Sa Ft. 2. AREA OF HOUSE a. Coverage of Main Budding _ � ;Grcludirg Attached Garage or Accessory Bu<tti,nq l00 Sq Ft, b Area;f I 'Ficm Divides. By Area cf Lot x 'CL io - 3. AREA OF ACCESSORY BUILDING _ F (tndudes Cetached Garages.Tno Shed. Playt•cuses) _ _SG Ft _ Sq t a Coverage of Accessory Building Area r f Ar_cescrry f3uilrfmg Divided By Area cf Lot x IN % C" 4. AREA OF DECK _ Z'1 Sq Ft .—SG Ft a. Coverage of Deck ° Area of Deck Ciwded By Area&Lot x 1CC !a I axjtit it, thylV%-,t of my knowledge and hr:xf. the abo» intorn:aiwr: :� W Q 111yyy�} 2 5.7_ R C3 r7 C- tom. . Y , V S.0 PRofE� REVISED Br fi n[�Ir. �f ''�K� •it i pppL1CAT101JpN - 4 2011 DATED: OEC 16 2020 IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE RATIOS RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS Wdroo: t i 1 1c►lifnl. - -1� iiluch: 1 i fll: S 2'' /.uttc: -'S 11[I'k !i\ Illl . ♦I Itl 1f l d i ... s .! 1u1 .\1 MAXIMIA -I lil,f 1H) \1 PtR\11TIT11- 1 MPI-RVIt.t1 S I C I I \kl .1 fib f'�IPFK\ 14 I! `I Ri -1( L�N YARD k' ..) FL- :< R-15 ;- i'_.1W)I to Ih.114III l G�11 ,� •; :: 16.1101 I V 20 111.11 20.001 to 30,000 h,StaU -l jW01)I to r'11.+111+• �,'l�li i( •ru! I 'It'll —Base Lot 1reA** it the minimum end of the Int. %iie range in the"I of %rea'° column Area of lot: Q1 .2N-Q sq•ft' Existing _ Allowed Proposed Total impervious coverage = L'�li �c °; �(x°J se. tt '65S3. Sa ft Front Impervious coverage ro urSOcy,9'f4 I ;ittOl tO t est l'I rite knower-'ge ,irt!rel:f:1, the ahf—C 2 tect':`�I�nattirf ��'o o. S� PR F�9- BUILDING DEPARTMENT V[NOV �6, \�'j VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK 938 KING STREFT RYEBROOK,NY 10573 BOZO } (914)939-0668 FAx(914)939-5801 — J VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK www.aebrook.org BUILDING DEPARTME1:'-4T AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE VILLAGE CODE &216 - STORM SEWERS AND SANITARY SEWERS THIS AFFIDAVIT MUST BEAR THE NOTARIZED SIGNATURE OF THE LEGAL PROPERTY OWNER AND BE SUBMITTED ALONG WITH ANY BUILDING OR PLUMBING PERMIT APPLICATION. ANY BUILDING OR PLUMBING PERMIT APPLICATION SUBMITTED WITHOUT THIS COMPLETED AND NOTARIZED FORM WILL BE RETURNED TO THE APPLICANT. STATE OF NEW YOM COUNTY OF WESTCHESTE,Rr _) as: , residing at, L POJ being duly sworn, deposes and states that (s)he is the applicant above named, and further states that (s)he is the legal owner of the property to which this Affidavit of Compliance pertains at; Rye Brook,NY. 17ob Adircr, Further that all statements contained herein are true, and that to the best of his/her knowledge and belief, that there are no known illegal cross-connections concerning either the storm sewer or sanitary sewer, and further that there are no roof drains, sump pumps, or other prohibited stormwater or groundwater connections or sources of inflow or infiltration of any kind into the sanitary sewer from the subject property in accordance with all State, County and Village Codes. _ JJCJI, iSignature ot'Proper. (Print Name of Property Ownerts)) Sworn to before me this ` day of U V , 20 _ (Notary Public) (6) 3/2 U 19 This application must be properly completed in its entirety by a N.Y. State Registered Architect or N.Y. State Licensed Professional Engineer & signed by those professionals where indicated. It must also include the notarized signature(s) of the legal owner(s) of the subject property, and the applicant of record in the spaces provided. Any application not properly completed in its entirety and/or not properly signed shall be deemed null and void, and will be returned to the applicant. Please note that application fees are non-refundable. STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER ) as: t7C�L11IEL SNC hAPl•1 ,being duly sworn, deposes and states that he/she is the applicant above named, (print name of individual signing as the applicant) and further states that (s)he is the legal owner of the property to which this application pertains, or that (s)he is the for the legal owner and is duly authorized to make and file this application. (indicate architect,contractor,agent,attorney,etc.) That all statements contained herein are true to the best of his/her knowledge and belief, and that any work performed, or use conducted at the above captioned property will be in conformance with the details as set forth and contained in this application and in any accompanying approved plans and specifications, as well as in accordance with the New York State Uniform Fire Prevention & Building Code, the Code of the Village of Rye Brook and all other applicable laws, ordinances and regulations. By signing this application, the property owner further declares that he/she has inspected the subject property, and that to the best of his/her knowledge there are no roof drains, sump pumps or other prohibited stormwater or groundwater connections or sources of infiltration into the sanitary sewer system on or from the subject property. Sworn to before me this I Sworn to before me this 0 day of A M l , 20)'D day of U , 20 VV Signature of ProperTy Owner Signature of Applicant Print Name of Property Owner Print Name of Applicant Notary Public Notary Public fig) 3/21/19 i r d t 0 s � N N � � n a v r•� , �! vi G. a CN GQ a ao ., u O w x a w N Ln N �. h Ln c v c X iri H � W M �= Z o 00O ta O e o z en CA ¢� O oo z z o� oco 0 0-4 x o a CZ " z _ Z z Z ON a W 0011-1 A x w z pq i FBI F�1 w A oo co W , ~ z z a U � U g M . I w C W w � � � a cz a w " � z v W a A ° a ow �O z l u z A 0 U A W � j �I a a z as w 0 < R��� D EC FHWE Bm E MENT VIL E OF RYE OK MAY 1 1 2022 938 KIN ET RYE B ,NY 10573 _ VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK or BUILDING DEPARTMENT . ELECTRICAL PERMIT APPLICATION Westchester County Master Electricians License Required FOR OFFICE USE ONL1 BP#: �v2 " V EP#: "� Approval Date: MAY 1 2 1t112�p - Permit Fee: $ f Approval Signature: V Other: Disapproved: (fees are non-refundable) Application dated, 05/11/2022 is hereby made to the Building Inspector of the Village of Rye Brook NY,for the issuance of a Permit to install and/or remove electrical equipment,wiring,fixtures,or to perform other high or low voltage electrical work as per the detailed statement described below. The applicant & property owner, by signing this document agree that all electrical work performed will be in conformance with all applicable Federal,State,County and Local Codes. J.Address: 16 Birch Lane,Rye Brook NY 10573 SBL: 135.43-1-5 ,.2t Zone:P 2.Property Owner: Robert&Haley Will Address: 16 Birtch Lane Rye BrookNY 10573 Phone#: Cell#: email: 3.Master Electrician: Antonio Ferrao Address: 313 Highridge Ct.,Peekskill NY 10566 Lic.#: 780 Phone#: 914-589-7951 Cell#: 347-585-0913 email: Feiraoantonio4hotmail.com Company Name: Antonio Ferrao Electric Address: 313 Highridge Ct Peekskill NY 10566 4.Proposed Electrical Work/Fixture Count: Wire and bound in-ground pool BUILDING PERMIT#BP-22-028 STATE OF NEW YORK,COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER ) as: Antonio Ferrao ,being duly swom,deposes and states that he/she is the applicant above named,and does further (print name of individual signing as the applicant) state that(s)he is the legal owner of the property to which this application pertains,or that(s)he is the Master Electrician for the legal owner and is duly authorized to make and file this application. (indicate architect,contractor,agent,attomey,etc.) The undersigned further states that all statements contained herein are true to the best of his/her knowledge and belief,and that any work performed,or use conducted at the above captioned property will be in conformance with the details as set forth and contained in this application and in any accompanying approved plans and specifications,as well as in accordance with the New York State Uniform Fire Prevention&Building Code,the Code of the Village of Rye Brook and all other applicable laws,ordinances and regulations. Sworn to befor me this /1 Sworn to e o e r e this 11 da of ,20 � day of 20� tgnatu Property Owner Si ature pp cint � � �� ✓tea *Obhc Property wner P ' e Applicant c 11 JACQUELINE A VERE JACQUELINE A VERE NOTARY PUBLIC,STATE OF NEW YORK NOTARY PUBLIC,Mn OF NEW YORK Registration No.01 VE6370616 Registration No.01VE6370616 Qualified in Dutchess County Qualified in Dutchess Comty Commission Expires February 5,2026 r�;�on Fires February 5,20M 12 Z021 INSPECTIONSTATEWIDE Service Willi littegril), 0:0 SWIS JOBAPPLICATION0. Office Use Elect.Permit# - Date ' Bldg Permit# _ ZZ Utility ID# - vZ � Final Certificate# n City/Village ��( cw� Zip I (, .9 ) '> TowniLi c County L.1/i? S Address ' t �L�a Cross Street Section�3 r 4 Block Lot Ji Z Owner Name/Address(if different than k h �s'i' y t C{, L4/f t L Contact Number ❑Basement ❑ 1 st Fl. ❑2nd Fl. ❑3rd Fl. ❑More Than 3 Fl. ❑Garage ❑Attic ❑Outside ❑Residential ❑Commercial Receptacles Special Recept GFCI AFCI Switches Dimmers Smoke Alarms Carbon Monox Hood Trash Compact Amt Amps Range(s) Cooktop(s) Oven(s) Dishwashers Refrigerator Disposal Microwave Warm Draw Incandescent Fluorescent SERVICE Amperage Voltage 1 P 3P #Meters #Disconnect ❑Underground ❑New ❑Reconnect ❑Overhead ❑ Change ❑Visual Re-Inspection ❑ Safety Re-Inspection Re-Inspection Additional Information w t , 136 111 _Fjr-J - G2DAJ 1/,-) REC��O�� MAY 1 1 2022 LAGE OF RYE BROOKILDING DEPARTMENT This application is valid for one(1)year from the date received by SWIS.This application is intended to cover the above listed items to be inspected,if at any time of inspection additional items have been installed,you are authorized to make the inspection and adjust the fee for the additional items inspected.The applicant declares that there is no open applications for the above address with any other inspection company,The applicant,owner or authorized agent agrees to all the above terms and conditions as set forth for the application. Inspector Date Finalized Inspector# Company Name�1—( 0i\1( 0 Date Z ' Signature Address f ���^ �t �' City/Stateir �'L L Zip Code Y f ' rJ License# Phone# ---f 7 State Wide Inspection Services 1080 Main Street Fishkill, NY 12524 �i 845 24 Phone U 914-2194-219-1062 Fax ITATF VJIDF IN'PFCI10'V:FRV14 P, Email:office(a)swisny.com Website: www.swisny.com Service With Integrity BY THIS CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE STATE WIDE INSPECTION SERVICES CERTIFIES THAT: Upon the application of: Upon Premises Owned by: Antonio Ferrao Electric Wilk Residence 313 Highridge Court 16 Birch Lane Peekskill, NY 10566 Rye Brook, NY 10573 Located at: 16 Birch Lane, Rye Brook, NY 10573 Section: Block: Lot: Electrical Permit Number: 22-088 Certificate Number:2022-5815 Building Permit Number: BP-22-028 A visual inspection of the electrical system was conducted at the Residential occupancy described below.The electrical system consisting of electrical devices and wiring is located in/on the premises at: 16 Birch Lane, Rye Brook, NY 10573 The Exterior was inspected in accordance with the NYS and NFPA 70-2017 and the detail of the installation, as set forth below,was found to be in compliance on the 28th day of September 2022. Name Quantity Rating Circuit Type Pumps 02 GFCI 01 Pool Heater 01 Luminaire 01 Jandy Sub Panel 01 16AMP Timer Switch 01 A visual inspection was performed on the Inground Pool on September 28th, 2022 and conforms to NFPA 70-2017 NEC to date. Grounding and bonding to current codes Officer: Frank J. Farina This certificate may not be altered in any way and is validated only by the presence of a seal at the location indicated.This certificate is valid for work performed on the date of inspection only. r r = N 00 O ■ O N � W ■ N CN N � W a H k A a 4-4 Ln a W vi W 00 N O �� i, a r. C7 z M z ►-a �-1 oo W C x W ` 3 z N � Q w w 00 ulZ ^ H w H o,z V 0.4 u z can OC) ON Z w x . aMM� ON E tr, H ■ � O as w a � � z 8 J x v � W V 0 c w zo a X CR x O w M x u a a �4 z o w w BUILD D C '� INO DEPARTMENT , I Jul V LLA►GE OF RYE BROOK LI U N 1 3 2022 �J 938 KING STREET RYE BROOK,NY 1057 (914)939-0608 FAX(914)939-5801 VILLAGE OF RYI BROOK BOIL DING D_ERP,P_.TMENT PLUMBING PEI MIT APPLICATION Approval Date: Permit Fee: $`-J'1..��'_A6 Approval Signature: A Other: Disapproved: ****, # (fees are non-refundable) Application dated, is herebv made to the Building Inspector of the Village of Rye Brook NY, for the issuance of a Pennit to install an rem ve Plumbing as per detailed statenr ent described below. The applicant&property owner,by signing this document agree that said plumbing work will be in conformance lwith all applicable Federal,State.County and Local Codes. 1.Address: 13 7�5a� Q /� Zane:1`� 2.Proposed Work:It -Al�� __rJ 'aQ 9ox fz a Y�� f s�� 3.Property Owner: L,/./A Address: Phone#: � Cell #: / •INV- 8�. email: 4.Master Plumber:— Q ,Q..�jr Address: Lic.#; _phone#:�ft_—,t _ ll#: - email: Company Name. Address:60,Q Rol- 4eS* INDICATE FIXTMS& LINES TO BE INSTILLED AS PER THE FOLLOWIN SCHEDULE Location Water UrirmLti Fountains —Drinking Sinks Showers Dath Closets Fo Laundry Domestic Finr Sanitary Natural/ Other* Total unttainro s Tubs Tubs Service Service Sewer LP Gas Basement 1st Flav ?nd Flo R, 3 Flcor 4u Floor 5'I'Floor Exterior 5.* List Other Equipment/Provide Details: (Notarized Signatures Required Next 2 Pages) -7- 3n_I/t9 STATE�F NEW YO,P COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER ) as: e7-1 L4L eing duly sworn,deposes and states that he/she is the applicant above named, (print name of individual signing as ie applicant) and her states tha s e is the legal owner of the property to which this application pertains,or that(s)he is the for the legal owner and is duly authorized to make and file this application.(indicate architect,co tractor,agent,attorney,etc.) That all statements contained herein are true to the best of his/her knowledge and belief,and that any work performed,or use conducted at the above captioned property will be in conformance with the details as set forth and contained in this application and in any accompanying approved plans and specifications,as well as in accordance with the New York State Uniform Fire Prevention&Building Code,the Code of the Village of Rye Brook and all other applicable laws,ordinances and regulations. Sworn to before me this o Sworn to before me this day of ,20 cQ day of ,20 cQJ S gn ture of Property Owner Signature of Applicant int Name of Prop rty Owner Print Name of Applicant N1 NAr u tate of New York tary Publibotary Public,State of New Yak No.01ME6160063 No.01 PR4516405 Oua"ed in Westcheser G Qualified In Westchester County ZLOA Commission Expires January 29,2023 Commission Expires March 30, This application must be properly completed in its entirety and must include the notarized signature(s) of the legal owner(s) of the subject property, and the applicant of record in the spaces provided. Any application not properly completed in its entirety and/or not properly signed shall be deemed null and void and will be returned to the applicant. i 8/12/2021 • BUILDING DEPARTMENT D D VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK R JUN 13 2022 i 938 KING STREET RYE BROOK,NY 10573 (914)939-0668 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK ww%'.rvehik rg I BUILDING DEPARTMENT xxxxxxxxx*x�xxxxxxxx*xxxxx*x*xxxx�*xx***�*x***�x,�****,�,�*x**xxxxx*xx�x;xxxxxx*��x**xxx*,��xxx*xx***xx�*xx AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE VILLAGE CODE §216 • STORM SEWERS AND SANITARY SEWERS THIS AFFIDAVIT MUST BEAR THE NOTARIZED SIGNATURE OF THE LEGAL PROPERTY OWNER AND BE SUBMITTED ALONG WITH ANY BUILDING OR PLUMBING PERMIT APPLICATION. ANY BUILDING OR PLUMBING PERMIT APPLICATION SUBMITTED WITHOUT THIS COMPLETED AND NOTARIZED FORM WILL BE RETURNED TO THE APPLICANT . STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER ) as: 3, �1� , residing at, �rt��� ' (Print nan •) ,here you liNcl being duly sworn,deposes and states that(s)he is the applicant above named, and further states that(s)he is the legal owner of the property to which this Affidavit of Compliance pertains at; &,Ce-AC f1—+9rJ, , Rye Brook,NY. (job Address) Further that all statements contained herein are true,and that to the best of his/her knowledge and belief, that there are no known illegal cross-connections concerning either the storm sewer or sanitary sewer,and further that there are no roof drains, sump pumps, or other prohibited stormwater or groundwater connections or sources of inflow or infiltration of any kind into the sanitary sewer from the subject property in accordance with all State, County and Village Codes. (Signature of Propert.\ UmmkN)l h"_ V V th U-1 (Print Name 411ropert. O%�ncr(,)i Sworn to before me this of y-t , 20,)D LLL (Notan Publi, SRARI MELILLO Notary Public,State of New York No.01MEU60063 Qualified In Westchester County Z 7 Commission Expires January 29,20_.7 -3- 9/12/2021 O� N ' �y MWM � rWM• �.1 � = � rV� Y W v) ryC 4 y y p y Fr.l a w N a Q � � O S N L. rT occ tp 0 ,cis 3 $ a .. u ON M O Z p MM ^ en eqw F+1 00 t — Y O u 5 -y c r J H O �oo C� rh z V w S ►.. � 0-4 CX oc v 1�1 ►� U W U r v\ u c 00 N `S' E 0 r� 1� x C3• y� o z z �, c W N 0 i N � W W z oc z N u g A -v O Ey H O O W zgca � g� , x w �_ x W � x o � V 0 V a H p V A au o �1 _ U BUILDQRYE MENT E C E � V E VIL MAY 2 22, 938 KING Q ,NY 1057322 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK BUILDING DEPARTMENT Application for Permit to Remove, Abandon and/or Install Fuel Storage Tank (*Storage Tanks in excess of 1,100 gallons require registration with the County of Westchester) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: PERMIT#: Approval Date: MAY 2 6 7922 Permit Fee: $ C .1 Approval Signature: Other: Disapproved: (fees are non-refundable) REQUIREMENTS FOR RELEASE OF PERMIT& CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: 1. Application Completed by Bonded, Licensed Contractor. 2. Your contractor's valid proof of liability insurance. (Village of Rye Brook must be listed as certificate holder) 3. Your contractor's valid proof of workers compensation insurance. (Form# C 105.2 or Form#U26.3 /or NY State Workers Compensation Waiver) 4. Fee per Tank: Removal, Abandonment, or Installation: S 185.00 per Tank. 5. Dig Safely New York#(dial 811): 6. Inspection by Building Department for removal/abandonment and/or installation. 7. Submit all Manifests & Reports(after work has been completed). 8. Certificate of Compliance will be provided when all requirements are fulfilled. ******************* ********************************************************************************* Application dated, l;t , is hereby made to the Building Inspector of the Village of Rye Brook for a permit to remove,abandon,and/or install a Fuel Tank as herein described. The applicant and property owner,by signing this document agree that the subject fuel tank(s)will be removed, abandoned and/or installed in conformance with all applicable Village,County, State& Federal laws,codes,rules and regulations. Indicate Permit Type: Installation (Vj • Removal ( ) • Abandonment( )/Above Ground ( )•Buried in Ground(1/� 1. Address: `�p �j( 1—AlU byl ��Qll�k� SBL: P'��� I� -1 -�^.Lone: 2(� 2. Property Owner&Address: NA r5V 'AZIC- Phone#: ell #: D:l 7j �3� email: 3. Contractor&Address: ��W C i (4V0 Pao PP4 60 /A2l Phone#:J-o} 7J1--?JVJ Cell#: c;7-0 ` "t6 -UZ`��f email!dyil5c, uUi � u n2ly 4. Applicant: (,)/►5 Ck vrj Phone#: b1511 Cell #: 07- email: r,flow&I'ritaij C�,2yg IvtA 5. Indicate Fuel Type: Fuel Oil ( )•L.P.Ga&-�O) •Gasoline( ) •Other( ): 6. Number and Capacity of each Tank: �� �� CelleV} W 7. Exact Location(s)of each Tank: t 8/12/2021 STAT�OF NEW ORK,CO>�TY OF WESTCHESTER ) as: Y)N Icy NEW SC Plo ,being duly sworn,deposes and states that he/she is the applicant above named, (print name of individual signing as the applicant) and furtherates t t(s)he is the legal owner of the property to which this application pertains,or that(s)he is the M wt, I for the legal owner and is duly authorized to make and file this application. (indicate architect,contractor,agent,attorney,etc.) That all statements contained herein are true to the best of his/her knowledge and belief,and that any work performed,or use conducted at the above captioned property will be in conformance with the details as set forth and contained in this application and in any accompanying approved plans and specifications,as well as in accordance with the New York State Uniform Fire Prevention&Building Code,the Code of the Village of Rye Brook and all other applicable laws,ordinances and regulations. Sworn to before me this Sworn to before me this day of ,20 D-D day of ,20 81a_ *ign25e;2onfPh76`ertywner Signature of Applicant w� F ),Rk7�v►d (�/� 5 c,1�y v� nt Name QPropeOwner rint Name of Applicant tAL Notary PubliMMI MEU N� t,Rrlgi �. '— NO�1�Publk,�e of New York - No.olME6160063 No.01ME6160063 Qualified in Westchester County Quallfied In Westc"O'r C00� Commission Expires January 29,2;�2 Tsommiss on EVIras January 29, ils application must be properly completed in its entirety and must include the notarized signature(s) of the legal owner(s) of the subject property, and the applicant of record in the spaces provided. Any application not properly completed in its entirety and/or not properly signed shall be deemed null and void and will be returned to the applicant. 2 8/12/2021 �M Quality Steel Corporation UG Propane Tanks OaD'tl 1F7�"•TH Lj Ff]_ffT J 14% r'S- AND M .•�=F' ,a''.OATL UN0tRGRC}J14O V1SSEE(AWNSIONS A`ID SMIFKATIONS WARR OrULME Itk ►�fLAU OWRAII OVtR,ALL. HL10,HI LEG" ViVIGHt ---QUMIIIY CAPd J1Y O:.r 11'VE U'.f:�111 UGSR UCsER WIDTH 9r.•) Iuu fc:AlJ NXItltct 12Owit. 44, E13a. � a 3•2w 4'•S- 1'-1112• 1b0 109 196 :G 11.4 2 SO w 3C' ►M r-f I' 1 C 4'6' S' 1' 1' S' 4Sp S4 9 320 wit. 30' r ir.�,. Y r 4-6- 1' 11-V 620 4S Soo wR- 17 112' Heft. la ,' 1' 1'-r 9SO 37 130 1 S 1 1:Y 1'91 1AM i 1S 61 ' 14So w,;. 4b I 17•4" ',• 9' 9'' 19W wg 46112' M; 23'•11" S'9' i 9r 3_$50 Dnwrra,me mid%V cftrtaan. ..t Me a Y.;..rarar a vvsa►t.Two .rn 'Csat Ihtvt&,V to`40 ant low W&ata^Ga,d ta•ar ••i09.ulna SMS%Oar-Of R%"+M Irwdw raft botW CPWA&WIN ry M ore son lI(1,:�0 )X+e Ka.and txis re MAW.. n Nla for-*carver ft4 w or rntaar o U0 and U=ag aue6ard to-As ;%34 t W CON!rtter 'W.:as aid oat at ttUra*aefars •••rat.3sd ad vtact"'Wetaw vW%fty iilow bouar_ 040a wW%atar kA"4f %:++tr O.tak GtY.eral spec-fxzilions Corforms to the Latest eCdwn oI ASME Ru'-m for Con. wix'.ton of Vrrsare Vt:se%.Section Vtll, Dvcuon 1. Compiles w 4th%PA Sa. Rated at 2W psi from 20'F to 125'F. At vessels registered wto National board, Sonic standard vessels avafta5'c wth CKN ICaradlan Registration NLmberl YrsNs sh,pped with Curable ready to bury coatfrg. Vessels,depending on n ar if aurng local for, are eVicr powder coated w`t'h pt'rnoifc epoxy. Iss ntcd with a&efg c appkatson umd►afwe coating, or, primed wtth Ifaa►d epoxy and coated with hqud epoxy top coat all providing a durable ready to>bury coaatiry All ves:eis are shipped vacuum pre pulMd to erfadle sfmplfied first fill of the Vessel. Urcen composite dome provides Large working spoor and is reststart to the elements_ Anode stud attacrtcd to nser pipe to enab'c ease of cattfodK connQCtlon- ADt Lc�e 1wH•a,vrar r a•Ixr rrvsta]raa ray roils^aprry-**arena Ka 4s's.,vwi s cmNlw a d c ararlc rrcr+rvt»r Trs i.v%ssw".Pots far an <trrc4o[a vi"of +tsta,brat aid Nras.edam,rvt•Ja a»t►w-lady pgpr y✓ fir"Of pow WAA 2b3 &,A: Cath3de pweaetrr,»au+aa Caarnry'nat be tort "%0 ar f al rear+,.Dud ara.2 rv4 t 3I*jAr wr►M%WAL ato"dr ritaaAA'ads t%o,Uttd Y SA"IS, Include Map Overviews& Pictures and Sketches of the Job aoo Ic sru Pool Htr ` fx R622 CFF 30'1"PE 00 t BuU In Q •16 Birch Ln,Rye FUtUre Werlinich Asset Brook,NY 10573 Management G E Jea• Location r Red Roof Dr C ; d 175'%"PE Gas Line to Reg 500 Gallon UG Tank Location 5'from Pool Heater a, d r + :D ROOF ?IVE _! %t � y E►Ytit14'f . �Y NY:�Mt:3 GKl►td .. rbd a —J rS Y w 6 N04 v 1 Form Revised 911312021 ► PENTAIR CLEAN & CLEAR PLUS CLEAN & CLEARO PLUS CARTRIDGE FILTER Crystal clear water the easy way. The Clean&Clear Plus Filter combines top-end filter performance with low maintenance. This dependable design uses special filter elements to strip tiny particles from your pool water,some as small as 20 microns(an average grain of beach sand is 1,000 microns). Our four-cartridge design provides maximum filter surface area to capture more dirt and extend time between cleanings.And cleaning is a snap—open the top,remove the cartridges,hose them off and the Clean&Clear Plus Filter is ready to go again. We've optimized cartridge surface consistency to block and trap the maximum amount of solids.Plus we use the most durable materials to extend cartridge life.The Clean&Clear Plus Filter delivers commercial-grade performance that keeps pools clean and sparkling, day in and day out. ri PENTARCOM ..�. . r p i T CLEAN&CLEAR°PLUS CARTRIDGE FILTER 4. Four cartridges in a compact design. �' y Clean&Clear Plus Filters contain four polyester cartridges = 4 that hold enormous amounts of dirt,yet are easier to clean. The fiberglass-reinforced tank halves are secured with an innovative clamp ring—just loosen the ring and remove the top half for easy cartridge access and rinsing.Filter maintenance doesn't get any easier. KEY FEATURES Single-piece base and tank T'°-inch drain 2-inch plumbing Constructed of fiberglass-reinforced Easy to access and located to ensure For maximum flow and faster water cleaning. polypropylene for strength,corrosion complete draining,making winterization resistance and stability for years of fast and simple. Easy access \ dependable service. Internal air bleed Clamp ring makes it quick and easy to remove and rinse cartridges and provides Four-cartridge design Continuous internal air bleed helps prevent access to internal parts to speed service Traps more dirt and extends time air buildup to keep the filter operating at routines. between cleanings. peak performance. Model Filter Area Vertical Filter Flow Rate GPM' Turnover Capacity-Res.(Gallons) Number Sq.Ft. Clearance* Diameter Residential 8 hrs. 10 hrs. 12 hrs. CCP240 240 56" 21.5" 90 43,200 54,000 64,800 CCP3201 320 62" 21.5" 120 57,600 72,000 86,400 CCP4201 420 68" 21.5" 150 72,000 90,000 108,000 CCP5201 520 74" 21.5" 150 72,000 90,000 108,000 'Certified to NSF/ANSI Standard 50. 'Residential rate.375 GPM per sq.ft.of filter area. P E N TA I R 6seLect* TRADEGRADE The Clean&Clear Plus Cartridge Filter The TradeGrade family of has earned the Eco Select'brand products is exclusively made distinction as one of the greenest and for and sold by the world's most most efficient choices from Pentair. demanding pool professionals. 1620 Hawkins Ave I Sanford,NC 27330 1 United States 1 800.831.7133 1 pentair.com All indicated Pentair trademarks and logos are property of Pentair.Third party registered and unregistered trademarks and logos are the property of their respective owners. PI-1319/20 02020 Pentair.All Rights Reserved.Pentair.com G W_Wd NWANO Swdrd 50 PENTAI R MASTERTEMP MASTERTEMP HIGH PERFORMANCE HEATER Fast, efficient and built to enhance your pool enjoyment. Q PENTAIR BIG PERFORMANCE. SMALL FOOTPRINT. Efficiency, fast heating and simplicity in a sleek, compact package. Economical and fast When you want the soothing experience of warm water, Premix combustion technologyfor best-in-class efficiency and fast warm-ups;no long waits to the MasterTemp°High Performance Heater brings you enjoy your pool. the design features that deliver lower operating costs, easy operation and a long, dependable service life. MasterTemp heaters are well-known for best-in-class Enhanced design energy efficiency and low emissions, even while heating sleek,updated looks with easy-to-use controls. your pool quickly.They feature an exceptionally compact design for such a high-performance heater, so they fit on smaller, less-intrusive equipment pads. Controls are intuitive and easy to use. MasterTemp heaters are also Built to last designed for super-quiet operation to help keep your Tough,rustproof composite exterior weathers the elements. poolside experience tranquil. 4 4= r . _r Rotatable keypad for easy access in any orientation Easy-to-use,intuitive controls for operation Quiet operation keeps and diagnostics your poolside tranquil Built-in safety features assure system protection and easy diagnostics Certified for low NOx emissions and outperforms industry standards PENTOiF MASTERTEMR' I HIGH PERFORMANCE HEATER Make the move toward greater comfort and efficiency. Learn more from your Pentair dealer or visit pentair.com. POOL SIZING' °F Heater Size Heater Size Temperature Model Model Model Model Model Model Model Model Model Model Change/ 175 200 250/25OHD 300 400/40OHD 175 200 250/25OHD 300 400/400HO 24 Hrs. Pool Capacity in Gallons Pool Surface Area in Sq.Ft.at 5.5'Depth 5 85,210 97,383 121,729 146,075 194,766 2,069 2,364 2,955 3,546 4,727 10 42,605 48,691 60,864 73,037 97,383 1,034 1,182 1,478 1,773 2,364 15 28,403 32,461 40,576 48,692 64,922 690 788 985 1,182 1,576 20 21,303 24,346 30,433 36,519 48,691 517 591 739 887 1,182 25 17,042 19,477 24,346 29,216 38,953 414 473 591 710 945 30 14,201 16,230 20,288 24,345 32,461 345 394 493 591 788 35 12,173 13,912 17,390 20,868 27,824 296 338 423 507 675 40 10,651 12,173 15,216 18,260 24,346 259 295 369 443 591 'ASME models available.See your Pentair representative for details. SPA SIZING' Spa Volume(Gallons) Model 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 11000 Minutes for 30°F Temperature Rise(Heater Input in 1,000 BTU/HR) 175 21 31 40 50 61 71 81 91 102 200 18 27 35 44 53 62 71 80 89 250/25OHD 16 24 31 39 47 54 62 70 78 300 14 20 27 33 40 47 53 60 67 400/40OHD 9 13 18 22 27 31 35 40 44 'Note:The chart is based on a 30°F(16.6°C)temperature rise,discounting losses and only based on heat required to raise temperature in minutes.Two-year limited warranty.See warranty for details. ' PENTAIR TRADEGRADE The TradeGrade family of products is exclusively made for and sold by the worlds most demanding pool professionals. 1620 Hawkins Ave I Sanford,NC 27330 1 United States 1 800.831.7133 1 pentair.com All indicated Pentair trademarks and logos are property of Pentair Inc.or its global affiliates in the U.S.A.and/or other countries.Third party registered and unregistered trademarks and logos are the property of their respective owners. P1-004 10/20 (`2020 Pentair.All rights reserved. RD Ec [E w [E FEB - 2 2022 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK BUILDING DEPARTMENT r Width: 14' Length: 33' Depth: 3'-6" to 5'-4" Ron �s PENTAIR INTELLIFLO VS+SVRS lNTELLlFLO' VS + SVRS VARIABLE SPEED PUMP The smart choice for savings and added protection. a ?. . 7:1 Yr I& an PENTAIR.COM eco select PENTAIR ADDED SAVINGS. GREATER PEACE OF MIND. IntelliFloll VS+SVRS Pump—trusted by parents who want greater peace of mind. The IntelliFlo VS+SVRS Variable Speed Pump was the first pump s . developed with an integrated Safety Vacuum Release System(SVRS).This _ system features a built-in controller and proprietary software designed to yr+ help detect a suction or drain blockage and automatically stop the pump, providing an added layer of protection against entrapment when used in conjunction with VGB-approved drain covers. The IntelliFlo VS+SVRS Pump complies with the current ASME A112.19.17 standard for Safety Vacuum Release Systems(SVRS).' w / .fit PENTAIRiCHLOR • o SALT CHLORINE GENERATOR Smart technology for healthier, purer pool water. I, � .: vE •t Vill. iCHL� - Mall OUTPUT LESS MORI 0 CERTIFTED TO iCHLOR WITH SMARTSENSE`"DETECTION Our advanced features deliver consistent operation and important safeguards to protect your family. SmartSense Cover Detection't iChlor with SmartSense Detection SmartSense Flow Detection' Reduces chlorine output when Assesses status of the automatic pool cover is closed. IntelliFlo Pump before generating chlorine. Only available on iChlor 30(1.0)models t Requires separately purchased iChlor Cover Kit.Please refer to your pool cover manufacturer for additional instructions • 6 0 • 6 -•• UNMATCHED CONVENIENCE Keep your pool water clear and inviting with electrolytic chlorine generation—the easiest,most effective and convenient way to maintain your pool.You get the same sanitation performance as manual chlorine addition without all the drawbacks. ® 25 No more buying,carrying, No more spills,odor,stinging No more bleached-out storing or handling chlorine. eyes or irritated skin. bathing suits. EFFORTLESS CHLORINATION Simply adjust the output to achieve the precise level of chlorine. iChlor does the rest,automatically producing a steady stream of pure chlorine for softer,silkier pool water that's free of bacteria and other contaminants.What could be easier? Easy setup Adjust your sanitizing level in 1%increments from 1-100%.Push the button,and you're done. Smart design Automatic reverse cycling helps prevent scale build-up.And,unlike its competitors,the electronics are isolated in the cell and away from high-heat components for more dependable performance. ;< Two model sizes Choose from two model sizes to meet your pool chlorination needs.Sizing is based on pool capacity in gallons: = Available Models • iChlor 15(0.6)for pools up to 15,000 gallons. • iChlor 30(1.0)for pools up to 30,000 gallons. Fact center Once the chlorine has finished purifying the pool of contaminants, . Indoor/outdoor,vertical/horizontal installation. it reverts back into dissolved salt and the cycle repeats. • 115/230V,50/60Hz power center. iCHLORO SALT CHLORINE GENERATOR AUTOMATION READY For ultimate convenience,the iChlor Salt Chlorine Generator seamlessly interfaces with Pentair Automation Systems. ADDED CONVENIENCE AND CONTROL With its user-friendly controls and displays,iChlor lets you make adjustments simply by pushing a button.When using with automation and the ScreenLogic20Interface,control it from anywhere at any time via your computer,tablet or smartphone. Now also compatible with the Apple Watch"wrist-wearable device for added convenience and with the Amazon Echo°for hands-free voice control. Find out why the iChlor Salt Chlorine Generator is the best chlorinator for your pool at pentairpool.com/ichlor. 6select TRADEGRADE ►�� �. �� R The iChlor Salt Cniorine Generator nos ne ruoa rape ra,.,d/:" earned the Eco Select'brand distinction products is exclusively made as one of the greenest and most for and sold by the world's most efficient choices from Pentair. demanding pool professionals. 1620 Hawkins Ave Sanford,NC 27330 United States ; 800.831.7133 pentair.com All Pentair trademarks and logos are owned by Pentair plc.iChlor'.SmartSense'".Intelli Flo",Screen Logic2-and Eco Select'are trademarks and/or registered trademarks of Pentair Water Pool and Spa.Inc.and/or its affiliated companies in the United States and/or other countries.Apple Watch'is a registered trademark of Apple.Inc.in the United States and/or other countries.Amazon Echo-is a registered trademark of Amazon Technologies.Inc.in the United States and/or other countries.Because we are continuously improving our products and services.Pentair reserves the right to change spB"'r'^ ^5 ithou! notice. Pentair is an equal opportunity employer. Pt-778 09/18 02018 Pentair Water Pool and Spa.Inc.All rights re.,.<.�z, C E UM RECEIVED MAY 14 2021 VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE May 13, 2021 APPROVED 7-0 RESOLUTION APPROVING A SITE PLAN AND STEEP SLOPES PERMIT APPLICATION FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 16 BIRCH LANE VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK PLANNING BOARD WHEREAS, Daniel Sherman, RLA submitted an Application on behalf of the property owners, Robert and Haley Wilk, for approval of a Site Plan and Steep Slopes Work Permit for the construction of an in-ground swimming pool, stone patio and wooden deck stairs within an area of moderate and very steep slopes on the property located at 16 Birch Lane in the R-15 District, Section 135.43, Block 1, Lot 28 as shown on the Town of Rye Tax Assessor's Map (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, the Planning Board is the Approval Authority for this application pursuant to Section 209-1.A(2)(a) and Chapter 213 of the Village Code; and WHEREAS, the Proposed Action is a Type 2 Action pursuant to the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) requiring no further environmental review; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board reviewed the following plans and application materials: 1. Short Environmental Assessment Form dated 1/21/21 and EAF Mapper Summary Report dated 1/22/21; 2. Application for Site Plan Approval; 3. Site Plan Submittal Review Checklist; 4. Building Permit Check List & Zoning Analysis; 5. Notice of Disapproval prepared by Michael J. Izzo, Building Inspector, dated 2/25/21; 6. Exterior Building Permit Application; 7. The following engineering plans generally entitled, "Wilk Residence" prepared Christopher S. Utschig, PE, last revised 4/28/21: a. Sheet 1 of 3, "Site Plan," b. Sheet 2 of 3, "Steep Slope and Impervious Coverage Plan," C. Sheet 3 of 3, "Construction Details;" 8. A plan entitled, "Landscape & Tree Protection Plan," prepared by Daniel Sherman, RLA, dated 5/3/21; 9. A plan entitled "Topographic Survey" prepared by Ahneman Kirby, dated 10/29/21; and WHEREAS, on March 11, 2021 the Planning Board referred the application to the Zoning Board of Appeals for consideration of the following variances which were approved by the Zoning Board of Appeals on April 6, 2021: • Village Zoning Code §224-7.D—No pool or associated structures or equipment shall be located in any front yard as defined in Chapter 250, Zoning. The applicant proposes to install the in-ground swimming pool and the swimming pool patio in the front yard of the property at the Red Roof Drive elevation. • Village Zoning Code §250-37.0 — The maximum allowable Total Impervious Coverage for this property is 7,005 square feet. The proposed pool and pool patio will result in a Total Impervious Coverage of 8,583 square feet. • Village Zoning Code §250-37.D — The maximum allowable Front Yard Impervious Coverage is 35%.The proposed pool and patio will result in a Front Yard Impervious Coverage of 39.2%; and WHEREAS, a duly advertised public hearing was opened by the Planning Board on May 13, 2021, at which time all those wishing to be heard on the Application were given such opportunity, and the public hearing was closed on May 13, 2021; and WHEREAS, due to public health and safety concerns related to the current COVID- 19 pandemic,the March 11,April 8 and May 13,2021 meetings of the Planning Board at which this application was heard,were duly noticed and held via videoconference in accordance with the requirements of the Zoning Code of the Village of Rye Brook and the Governor's Executive Orders which suspend the "in-person" requirements of the NYS Open Meetings Law and provide alternative means by which to conduct public meetings and hearings; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board has considered the Steep Slopes Work Permit standards set forth at Village Code § 213-6 concerning the disturbance of steep slopes for the construction of a swimming pool on the Property which will involve disturbance of an existing 778 square foot area of steep slopes to be graded for the installation of the pool and pool deck which will be supported by a retaining wall that varies from 1-4 feet in height; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board, Village Planning Consultant, and Village staff have reviewed all application materials, including any public comments and made recommendations; and WHEREAS,the Planning Board is fully familiar with the application and the property. NOW THEREFORE BE, IT RESOLVED, that for the reasons stated herein, the Village of Rye Brook Planning Board hereby approves the Site Plan and Steep Slopes Work Permit to construct an in-ground swimming pool, stone patio and wooden deck stairs within an area of steep slopes on the Property, subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the topographic survey shall be signed and sealed by the Land Surveyor. 2. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, a note shall be added to the Site Plan indicating the variances granted by the Zoning Board of Appeals on April 6, 2021. 3. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the Landscape Plan shall be revised to correct the note concerning the removal and replanting of arborvitae during construction to limit the implementation of such note to the area near the proposed construction entrance. 4. The wall of arborvitae on the east side of the subject property shall be maintained in a vigorous growing condition. 5. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the Site Plan shall be revised to include construction management notes such as permitted hours of construction, direction for contractor/construction worker parking to be located on Birch Lane rather than Red Roof Drive, and a requirement that the Applicant provide written notice to the owner of 22 Red Roof Drive prior to the start of construction, to the satisfaction of the Building Inspector. 6. Any damage to Belgium block curb on Red Roof Drive shall be restored to its condition immediately prior to the construction to the extent practicable as determined by the Building Inspector. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that no permits shall be issued until the Applicant has paid to the Village all applicable fees and professional review fees incurred in connection with review of this Application. On motion by Ms. Schoen, seconded by Mr. Morlino, Mr. Michal Nowak, Superintendent of Public Works/Village Engineer, called the roll: MR. GOTTLIEB Voting AYE MR. GRZAN Voting AYE MR. MILLER Voting AYE MR. MORLINO Voting AYE MS. SCHOEN Voting AYE MR. TARTAGLIA Voting AYE CHAIRMAN GOODMAN Voting AYE BUILDING DEPARTMENT VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK 938 KING STREET RYE BROOK,NY 10573 JAN 2 2 2021 (914)939-0668 FAX(914)939-5801 www.ryebrook.or� *********************************************************************************************************** FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: BOT Approval Date: PB Approval Date: sl I l z BOT Disapproval Date: PB Disapproval Date: Attach Resolution Hereto: O� 0?TT�I�] PB V/ZBA[ ] Chairman: SITE PLAN FEE: 5 � n DATE PAID: o ENVIRONMENTAL FEE: -0 c;l1Syy" /''� DATE PAID: &4P O OTHER: *********************************************************************************************************** APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL Submission of this application does not assure placement on any Planning Board Agenda.The Applicant will be notified of such placement. *********************************************************************************************************** This application references but is not limited to the following sections of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook;§250 ZONING,§209 SITE PLAN REVIEW,§235 TREES,§107 DEMOLITION OF BUILDINGS,§224 SWIMMING POOLS,§121 EXCAVATION&TOPSOIL REMOVAL, §118 EROSION&SEDIMENT CONTROL, §213 STEEP SLOPES PROTECTION, §219 SUBDIVISION OF LAND, §250-40 NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS. Applicants and their Design Professionals are strongly advised to review the above mentioned code sections online at,www.ryebrook.orQ prior to completing and/or submitting this application. APPLICATION FEE SCHEDULE: Residential Dwellings- $325.00,plus$200.00 per additional dwelling unit. Non-Residential Buildings- $475.00,plus $30.00 per parking space. Planned Unit Development-$600.00,per acre PUD Amendment- $300.00 Site Plan Amendment- $575.00 Wetlands&Watercourse- $1,150.00,permit$250.00 Consultant Review(Escrow)Fee: Minimum fee$250.00-maximum fee$2,500.00 to be determined by the Village Engineer. Application fees are non-rejundable. The applicants Escrow Account must have a positive balance at all times prior to anv Consultant. Attorney, or Village review. Escrow Fees and Site Plan Fees must be paid on separate checks made payable to the Village of Rye Brook. *********************************************************************************************************** 1. Site Address: Ua 161000 Lf-)"kE Parcel fD#: 135•LL3-1-5 28Zone:1Z1Z� 2. Property Owner: 'Qop> T-+ A-1ALn�-[ Address: llo &QCjA Lf t46 E-Mail: NALEysW ILK Q 4ANGO-Cp-n Tel.#: Q�'1-3? - g"J' 'J� 1 Other: 3. Applicant:TLnokCL 3 1E %Ay::q" Address:4bQr' y r -jaCa t�11'tWAl1A LU`I E-Mail:1��. 6m,"1L-C.cm Tel.#: Other: 4. Design Professional: C4-\'_1S QTVEA1CA Address:"5 yjaj2LA pUt , l.L.)ga u(E-Mail:C} ,5 2 `5 Vtr Tel.#: Q k Lk qn� Other: 5. Designate to whom correspondence is to be sent: C�Q\S CTC�!-\I�•� Note: If applicant is a"Contract Vendee",please attach a copy of the contract summary with financial and confidential terms deleted. t sltr2o2o 6. Street which property abuts: CXV az fgw ii�_p 7. Does property connect directly into State or County highway? { )NO ( )YES: 8. Is site within 500 feet of Village Boundary? ('J)NO ( )YES if yes note all bordering municipalities: 9. Total area of site: D , �356-q Area of site activity: 71 LA-5 10. Site coverage: -I CA %; Building coverage: H % 11. Existing building size: — New/additional building size: 12. Existing parking spaces: New parking spaces: 13. Nature of proposed activity: GW_LL3C> 15�I"t� .nt&_3G. NDCO►- , .S7C'A-3E 'S-rA%9- ****************************************************************************************** Please note that this application must include the notarized signature(s) of the legal owner(s) of the above-mentioned property, in the space provided below.Any application not bearing the legal property owner's notarized signature(s)shall be deemed null and void,and will be returned to the applicant. STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER ) as: IDA"kGL, ,being duly sworn, deposes and states that he/she is the applicant above named, (print name of individual signing as the applicant) and further states that (s)he is the legal owner of the property to which this application pertains, or that (s)he is the LP"CUnRE for the legal owner and is duly authorized to make and file this application. (indicate architect,contractor,agent,attorney,etc.) That all statements contained herein are true to the best of his/her knowledge and belief,and that any work performed,or use conducted at the above captioned property will be in conformance with the details as set forth and contained in this application and in any accompanying approved plans and specifications,as well as in accordance with the New York State Uniform Fire Prevention&Building Code,the Code of the Village of Rye Brook and all other applicable laws,ordinances and regulations. Sworn to before me this ZI Sworn to before me this 22 day of ;� }Q� , 20 Zl day of�1�►IJUAQy , 20 ZI Notary ub is u Sign ture of Property Owner Sig re ,A cant Print Name of Property Owner Print Name of Applicant z srl/2o20 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK 938 King Street,Rye Brook,N.Y. 10573 JAN 2 2 2021 (914)939-0753 Fax(914)939-5801 www.ryArook.org SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REVIEW CHECKLIST This form shall serve as a checklist for site plan submittal and review by the Village of Rye Brook. The use of this plan review checklist by the applicant is to ensure compliance with the technical provisions of§209 of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook entitled, Site Plan Review, pertaining to preliminary and final plan preparation. The Village Code is available on the Village Website at: www.ryebrook.org, Prior to the appearance before ANY meeting or hearing of the Planning Board,the applicant must comply with all Notification Requirements of Code Section 250-40. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL SHALL INCLUDE: 1. APPLICATIONS. Completed and signed including correspondences. 2. CHECKLIST. Completed and signed. 3. PLANS. Signed, Sealed & Dated. Four paper (4) copies and one (1) electronic version. One (1) record set with original signatures, dates and seals shall be provided and submitted with two (2) copies that clearly indicate the signatures, dates, and seals shown on the record set. 4. FEES: All application fees and Environmental fee. A separate check for filing fee and Environmental fee. 5. Environmental Assessment Form. Form available on the NYS DEC website and mapper. 6. Electronic Copy. Complete copy of all plans and shall be submitted electronically at time of submission. 7. No d AM vit f Sign Posting& Mail Notification. I, (Applicant's signature) have read the Notification Requirements of Cod ction 250-40 and will provide notification as required. IDENTIFICATION OF APPLICANT(S): Identification of Applicant: T)(:AQ1EL �'�."EV_rvN(�L) l PO,J�faipE, 7AQC.rATTEG" Applicant:DP&N1E1_. - 1_ e MALE Address: 4?RfMjj YN S )1TE t}`q,\kPLRAL l ley n5A5 Tel. #:qIL4- )DLA_ =01 Fax: E-Mail: (3M%L.Com Project Name: Ljk Lj ���►C� Project Address:j(p &VN LfV.,JE Current Property Owner: to ?— rD -}W)Ljaq WIC Address: (kO �3AVQ-A LP�QS , IZyE azff V "\1 Tel. #:C(k I" -52B' -Fax: E-Mail:40tLj2N5, % 1L LJ APAW.CCCn IDENTIFICATION OF PROPERTY: Identifying Title: Tax Designation: Section: 1�. Block: Lot: 5 .Z$ Zoning District: Street which property abuts: Qom) (-)UP ►Qo_[7L� Plan Submission Date: 1 I Ll I ZI Site Plan Checklist Page 1 of 7 6/l/2020 Project Address Y N NA PLAN REQUIREMENTS O O O 4 copies of plans prepared and signed by a registered Land Surveyor,Engineer or Architect. O O O One(1)electronic copy of all submitted plans and surveys. O O O Topographic Survey stamped by New York State Land Surveyor with license number and seal. O O O Topographic survey scale of one(1)inch per twenty(20) feet or larger. O O O Section, block and lot numbers of the property taken from the latest tax records along with a copy of the most recent property card on file with the Town of Rye Tax Assessor's office. O O O Name of the proposed subdivision plan. O O O Name and address of the owner of record. O O O Name and address of the applicant. O O O Deed reference(s). O O O Names, addresses and signature of every Engineer, Architect, Land Surveyor or Soil Scientist whose professional seal appears on any site plan submitted to the Board. O O O North arrow and scale. O O O Location map at the minimum scale of 1"equals 1,000 feet. O O O Area of all lots, in square feet. O O O Engineering notes on plans as stated in application packages. O O O Copies of all existing and proposed deed restrictions or covenants applying to the property, including, but not limited to, covenants and agreements restricting the use and establishing future ownership and maintenance responsibilities for all private roads,recreation,and open space areas. O O O Any prior land use approvals with respect to the subject property. 000 Date the plans were first drafted. Any revision(s)made to any of the sheets first submitted are to be so noted in the revision block. The revision block is to be placed on the originals of the revised sheets. Additional paper copies are to be made& submitted for the Planning Board&Building Dept. to replace those sheets previously submitted. O O O Other existing site improvements, including,but not limited to,fences,landscape or retaining walls,landscaping & screening. 000 Location of all buildings and structures on the premises and approximate location of all neighboring buildings or structures within 100 feet of the lot line. O 00 Fees paid to The Village of Rye Brook Building Department. O O O Any revisions to plans shall be identified with a revision cloud and numbered revision triangle Y N NA ABUTTING PROPERTY INFORMATION O O O The names and addresses of all abutting property owners within 250 ft as indicated in the Municipal records. O O O Zoning and use of abutting properties noted on plans. O O O Shape,size,height and location of existing buildings and driveways within one hundred(100)feet of the site. O O O Location and description of existing easements within one hundred(100) feet of the site. O O O Location of existing private or public trails within one hundred(100)feet of the site. O O O Location of existing roads, scenic roads and/or driveways within two hundred(200)feet of the site. O O O Location of proposed parkland. If none state nearest recreation facility O O O Location of existing septic system leach fields within two hundred(200)feet of the site. O O O Locations,dimensions,grades and flow direction of existing sewers,culverts,waterlines as well as other underground utilities within and adjacent to the property. Site Plan Checklist Page 2 of 7 6/1/2020 Project Address O O O The location of all existing watercourses, intermittent streams,wetland areas and springs,consistent with the definitions set forth in Chapter 245,Wetlands and Watercourses,of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook. Y N NA PROPOSED SITE PLAN INFORMATION O O O Sufficient, acceptable information to readily determine the location, bearing, and length of every street line, lot line, and property boundary line. O O O Location of all building setback lines. O O O Topographic data at a minimum contour interval of 2'-0"increments, showing existing and proposed contours on the property and extending a minimum of 25 feet into all adjacent properties. O O O The location and characteristics of the different areas of vegetation, including the identification of all individual trees 12 or more inches in diameter at breast height("DBH"),protected trees of any size, as well as stands of trees and wooded areas, within areas of proposed disturbance, consistent with the provisions of Chapter 235, Trees, of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook. O O O Location and proposed development of all buffer areas,including existing vegetative cover. O O O Location and description of any zoning district and municipal boundaries including a zoning compliance chart for the existing and proposed lots. O O O Shape,size,height and location of all existing and proposed buildings. O O O Location and description of any existing and proposed easements. O O O Location and dimensions of all existing and proposed streets,driveways,sidewalks,parking spaces,bicycle parking, loading areas and other facilities associated with the proposed use. O O O Identification of the location and amount of building area proposed for retail sales or similar commercial activity. O O O Location of existing and proposed utilities(water, sewer,gas,electrical,telephone,oil tank etc.). O O O Design and location of all existing and proposed wells,septic tanks and leach field systems,or methods of waste water disposal. O O O Location,type and size of all existing and proposed landscaping and screening including fences and walls. O O O Location, size and proposed screening of outdoor storage areas, if any. O O O Location, design and construction material of all existing or proposed site improvements, including drains, culverts, retaining walls,landscape walls and fences. O O O Exterior lighting plan and proposed signs to be located on site,including sign orientation,size,height,and elevation view. O O O Storm drainage plan and plans for snow removal and storage. O O O Pedestrian and automobile circulation plan. O O O Construction drawings for pavements,walks,steps,curbing,drainage&other structures associated with the proposed use. O O O Erosion and sedimentation control plan,including installation details of proposed control measures,directive construction notations and a schedule for the installation and maintenance of proposed control measure. O O O Description of measures planned to assure proper erosion and sedimentation control in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 118 entitled"Erosion and Sediment Control," of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook. O O O Drawing and computation for storm water detention design for a 25-year storm in accordance with the Westchester County Best Management Practices O O O Rock outcroppings and areas of steep slope consistent with the definitions set forth in Chapter 213, Steep Slope Protection, of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook. O O O Location of any common lands and/or public lands. O O O Phasing or an estimated project construction schedule. O O O Supporting documents,including deeds,maintenance,condominium agreements,etc. Site Plan Checklist Page 3 of 7 6/1/2020 Project Address 000 Location of proposed construction or area of disturbance and its relationship to any property line, easement, building, structure, road, wall, fence, sewage disposal system, well, wetland feature or tree exceeding six inches in diameter measured at a height of four feet from the ground O O O Estimate of earthwork showing the quantity of any material to be imported to and/or removed from the site including a chart with the number/species and size of any trees to be removed. 000 Location and size of areas of soils by soil types in the area of proposed disturbance and to a distance of 100 feet surrounding the area of disturbance. 000 Cross sections of steep slope areas. 000 Retaining walls or like constructions,with details of construction. O O O Approximate boundaries of any areas subject to flooding or stormwater overflows, including areas of special flood hazard and coastal high-hazard areas, consistent with the definitions set forth in Chapter 130, Flood Damage Prevention, of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook.Approximate Wetlands and wetland buffer boundaries shall be clearly delineated. 000 Location of fire and other emergency zones,including the location of fire hydrants. 000 Studies to include,but not necessarily limited to: environmental impact analysis,wildlife,traffic,stormwater management,recreation,public service,fiscal impact,visual impact and historic significance documentation,or a written request to waive the submission requirements for these studies. 000 Amount of any bonds required. 000 Amount of excavated material to be removed from site,if any. Y N NA OTHER(as applicable) 000 Record of application for and approval status of all necessary permits from state and county officials and local utility companies. 000 Identification of any federal,state or county permits required for the project's execution,including project referrals, if any,&environmental review procedures mandated by Article 8,Environmental Quality Review,of the Environmental Conservation Law(SEQRA). 000 Any other information felt necessary by the Planning Board to allow the Board to proceed with consideration&to make an informed decision. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CHECKLIST WESTCHESTER COUNTY PLANNING BOARD Notice to Applicants/Developers: At some point during the development review process your project may be referred to the Westchester County Planning Board for review and comment in accordance with state and county laws that require local planning boards, zoning boards of appeals and governing bodies to refer certain development applications to the County Planning Board. Referral to the County Planning Board may not occur until your project has progressed well along through the design process. Since the Planning Board's comments may impact project design,this checklist is provided to encourage early consideration of these areas of concern by applicants to avoid project changes later. For information on the County Planning Board review process and to access an electronic copy of this checklist, go online to www.westchcstergov.com/planningreferrals or contact Lukas Herbert at lah5@westchestergov.com. I.COUNTY PLANNING BOARD POLICIES: Written policies underlie all recommendations of the County Planning Board. Westchester 2025-Context for County and Municipal Planning and Policies to Guide County Planning,adopted by the County Planning Board on 5/6/08,amended 1/5/10,can be found at ww.westchestergov.com/2025. ❑Westchester 2025: Policies should be reviewed to determine how they relate to the development proposal. II.IMPACTS TO COUNTY FACILITIES AND SERVICES: The County Planning Board coordinates the review of development projects with Westchester County departments to identify and address potential impacts on County services and infrastructure.In some situations,permits and approvals may be required that could change project design. Site Plan Checklist Page 4 of 7 6/l/2020 Project Address ❑ Map of County Facilities: Review the State & County Roads and Parks map (which also includes county channel lines) to identify proximity to County facilities at: www.westchestergov.com/planningdocs/pdfinaps/countystateroadsparks.pdf. Other useful map links for information about environmental features, septic/sewer map, county sewer districts map, etc can be found at: www.westchestergov.com/maps ❑ COUNTY ROAD: Applications for development on sites that abut a County road must be submitted for review by the County Department of Public Works. Information and forms can be found at: www.westchestergov.con/dpw/bldgperm.htm. Former County Roads do not need review by the Department of Public Works,but will still likely trigger a review by the County Planning Board. ❑ COUNTY CHANNEL LINES: Applications for development on sites within 100 feet of a designated County Channel Line require a stream control permit from the County Department of Public Works. Information and forms can be found at: www.westchestcrgov.conVdpw/bldgperm.htm ❑ COUNTY PARK: New construction& land alteration projects adjacent to County parks are expected to address screening& buffer of new uses from the park, as appropriate. Stormwater should not drain from a developed site onto a County park without acceptable quantity and quality controls.County parks are designated as Critical Environmental Areas. ❑ SEWAGE TREATMENT AT COUNTY TREATMENT PLANT: Local municipalities are required to reduce and eliminate inflow and infiltration(I&I)into the sanitary sewage systems tributary to County treatment plants.New development will be expected to reduce I&I in relation to generation of new flow at a ratio of three to one. This requirement must be discussed with local officials. ❑BEE-LINE BUS SERVICE: Bee-Line bus stops serving a development site should be identified on plans or noted if located off-site. If a bus stop is located along the site's frontage, the applicant should contact the County Department of Transportation to discuss impacts and the need for improvements. Safe and separate pedestrian access should be provided to link a bus stop and sidewalk with building entrances. Information on County bus service and design guidelines can be found at: westchestergov.com/transportation/images/Bus%20Service°/a2OGuidelines.pdf ❑FAIR AND AFFORDABLE HOUSING: Many municipalities require inclusion of fair & affordable units in new developments. Financial assistance to achieve fair & affordable housing development is available through Westchester County & other sources. Applications that include new residential units to be affirmatively marketed & sold or rented subject to fair & affordable housing provisions should be tied to Westchester County guidelines on affordability including income guidelines of eligible households that can be found at: http://homes.westchestergov.com/. If County funding is sought to develop fair & affordable housing,the County Board of Legislators must be included as an involved agency under SEQR. ❑RECYCLING: New buildings must contain a designated area of sufficient size for separation and storage of recyclables and trash. Building expansions should also include sufficient space for separation and storage of recyclables. For more information about County recycling requirements go to:www.westchestergov.com/enviromnent_recycling.htm ❑STORM SEWER SYSTEM: Any connections to a County storm sewer line will require a permit from the Department of Public Works in accordance with the County Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination (IDDE) law. Information & forms can be found at:www.westchestergov.com/dpw/bldgperm.htm Non-stormwater discharges to the County storm sewer system are prohibited. III.DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS The County Planning Board's land use policies focus attention on several aspects of development that may have intermunicipal and quality of life impacts.The list below includes areas most frequently commented on by the County Planning Board. ❑WATER: All development plans should include sufficient provisions for stormwater management, water quality measures and mitigation of flooding. ❑Plans should identify the major drainage basin or watershed the site is located in (Croton River, Upper Hudson River, Lower Hudson,Upper Long Island Sound, Bronx River and Lower Long Island Sound). An interactive map with watershed boundaries can be found at www.westchestergov.com/planning/maps&lists/drainbasinsi Ix17.html ❑Watershed plans have been developed for several of the County's watersheds - the Croton, Indian Brook-Croton Gorge, Bronx River & Long Island Sound watersheds - that include specific recommendations that apply to development projects. See recommendations in watershed plans at:planning.westchestergov.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id= 1231& Itemid=2204 Site Plan Checklist Page 5 of 7 6/l/2020 Project Address ❑Development that involves filling, creation of impervious surfaces or buildings and substantive loss of natural vegetation in a floodplain or flood prone area should be avoided. ❑Above ground, vegetated retention/detention basins or devices are preferred because they perform better, are easier to inspect and maintain and provide additional environmental benefits over subsurface structural devices. Any such treatments should not be constructed within wetlands or buffer areas around wetlands. ❑The development should treat and retain as much stormwater on-site as possible,particularly when the site is located in a drainage basin with known flooding problems. A Construction Stormwater Toolbox with tools and sources of technical information related to the construction activities and stormwater management best practices is available from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation at:www.dec.ny.gov/chemicaU8694.html ❑New development should include protection of aquatic resources. For more information about protection of aquatic resourc-es & buffer areas,go to:planning.westchestergov.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1491&Itemid=2458 ❑Impervious cover should be minimized. Permeable paving surfaces should be used where feasible. Vegetative rain gardens should be used, particularly in areas of overland or channelized stormwater flow, to improve stormwater quality and reduce runoff volume. For more information,go to: www.wcstchcstcrgov.com/stormwater ❑Buildings along coastlines and low lying area should consider the impacts of sea level rise. Specific consideration is required of potential impacts to surface and subsurface drinking water supplies. ❑ SITE LAYOUT. Aesthetic design,building orientation and community character should be considered in the site layout and building appearance. ❑In most locations,buildings should face the street and have pedestrian access from the street. ❑Commercial buildings should be located near the front street line with the majority of parking located in the rear of the building. Even gas stations and convenience stores should be upfront in a landscaped setting with parking,pumps and canopy toward the rear. ❑Buildings should be of pedestrian-scale when seen from the sidewalk. ❑Building facades should contribute to and enhance the character of the community. El Driveway and pathway connections should be provided to adjacent sites when possible and crosseasements provided. ❑ STREETS. Street design should reduce unwarranted paving and promote connectivity. ❑New streets should connect with adjacent streets wherever feasible to prevent the proliferation of dead-end streets and promote neighborhood integration. ❑Connections could be vehicular or pedestrian/bicycle only,where appropriate. ❑Street widths should be minimized for streets with low traffic volume to reduce speeds and impervious surfaces. Lane widths of 12 feet are only appropriate for major roadways. El Driveway widths should be no more than 9 feet to reduce impervious surfaces. ❑Permeable paving surfaces should be used where feasible. ❑ GREEN TECHNOLOGY.New development should include as many green building elements as possible,such as:renewable building materials,energy efficient heating/cooling systems and fixtures,water saving devices,green roofs and permeable paving surfaces.Information can be obtained from the U.S.Green Building Council at: www.usgbc.org. ❑ LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING.The site improvements should enhance community character. Site Plan Checklist Page 6 of 7 6/1/2020 Project Address ❑ Landscaping should consist of native plant species appropriate for the location. Invasive plant species should be prohibited. Invasive plant information available at: www.westchestergov.com/planning/environmental/Reports/InvasivePlantsBrochO8.pdf ❑ Pollutant tolerant plantings should effectively shield parking,loading areas and refuse collection sites. ❑ Site lighting should be provided at the lowest safe levels and lowest heights,avoiding all spillage off site. ❑ PEDESTRIANS. Safe,convenient and ADA accessible pedestrian access is provided. ❑ A sidewalk should be provided along the site frontage along each street. ❑ Direct pedestrian connections should be made from the front of the building to the sidewalk. Pedestrian crossings of drive-ways& parking lots should be minimized or avoided. If they must be provided,painted crosswalks should be provided through parking lots. ❑ ADA accessibility must be provided. ❑ BICYCLISTS. Provisions for bicyclists should be incorporated into project design. ❑ Bicycle parking should be provided in commercial and residential developments.Guidelines can be found at: www.apbp.org/resource/resmgr/publ ications/bicycle_parking_guidelines.pdf ❑ If near a trailway or bicycle route,extra consideration should be given to bicycle accessibility such as bike lanes on internal roadways,bicycle parking and other amenities. ❑ Drive-thru lanes at uses such as banks and fast-food restaurants should also be accessible for bicycles. Waiver: Upon finding by the Building Inspector, Village Engineer, Planning Board or Board of Trustees that, due to the particular character or limited nature of development or change in use or to special conditions peculiar to a site, the submission of a final site plan,or certain portions of information normally required as part of the site development plan, is inappropriate or unnecessary or that strict compliance with said submission requirements will cause extraordinary and unnecessary hardship, such official or Board may waive such submission requirements wherever, in the opinion of such official or Board, such waiver will be consistent with the goal of promoting the public health, safety and general welfare of the community. The findings for granting such waiver shall become a part of the public record. Any waiver request must be made in writing, and include sufficient detailed information for the appropriate authority to make an informed decision. Design Professional's Certification of Completion of Checklist I have fully reviewed the Village of Rye Brook's requirements and certify this application to be a complete submission. I understand that an incomplete plat or incomplete checklist shall be deemed an incomplete submission and shall be returned to the applicant upon determination of such by the appropriate authority. EW Name(Print) % Qa w Signature H �S!• �t z 1 `'oFti Na. Date sFo PROFe55�o Professional Seal Site Plan Checklist Page 7 of 7 6/1/2020 Short Environmental Assessment Form Part I - Project Information JAN 2 2 2021 Instructions for Completing Part 1—Project Information. The applicant or project sponsor is responsible for the completion of Part 1. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding,are subject to public review,and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item,please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information. Complete all items in Part 1.You may also provide any additional information which you believe will be needed by or useful to the lead agency;attach additional pages as necessary to supplement any item. Part 1—Project and Sponsor Information Name of Action or Project: Wilk Residence Project Location(describe,and attach a location map): 16 Birch Lane,Rye Brook NY Brief Description of Proposed Action: Proposed in-ground swimming pool,stone patio,and wood deck stair Name of Applicant or Sponsor: Telephone: 914-824-0999 Daniel Sherman E-Mail: dan.danshermanlandscape@gmail.com Address: 4 Broadway Suite#9 City/PO: State: Zip Code: Valhalla NY 10595 1. Does the proposed action only involve the legislative adoption of a plan,local law,ordinance, NO YES administrative rule,or regulation? If Yes,attach a narrative description of the intent of the proposed action and the environmental resources that ✓❑ may be affected in the municipality and proceed to Part 2. If no,continue to question 2. El 2. Does the proposed action require a permit,approval or funding from any other government Agency? NO YES If Yes,list agency(s)name and permit or approval:Zoning,Engineering,Building ❑ 3. a.Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? 0.5 acres b.Total acreage to be physically disturbed? .12 acres c.Total acreage(project site and any contiguous properties)owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? acres 4. Check all land uses that occur on,are adjoining or near the proposed action: 5. ❑Urban ❑ Rural(non-agriculture) ❑ Industrial ❑ Commercial m Residential(suburban) ❑Forest ❑ Agriculture Aquatic ❑ Other(Specify): ❑Parkland Page 1 of 3 5. Is the proposed action, NO YES N/A a. A permitted use under the zoning regulations? ❑ ✓❑ ❑ b. Consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan? ❑ ❑✓ ❑ NO YES 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the predominant character of the existing built or natural landscape? 7. Is the site of the proposed action located in,or does it adjoin,a state listed Critical Environmental Area? NO YES If Yes,identify: ❑✓ ❑ NO YES 8. a. Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels? ❑✓ []— b. Are public transportation services available at or near the site of the proposed action? ❑✓ ❑ c. Are any pedestrian accommodations or bicycle routes available on or near the site of the proposed ❑ action? 9. Does the proposed action meet or exceed the state energy code requirements? NO YES If the proposed action will exceed requirements,describe design features and technologies: - - ❑✓ ❑ 10. Will the proposed action connect to an existing public/private water supply? NO YES If No,describe method for providing potable water: 11. Will the proposed action connect to existing wastewater utilities? NO YES If No,describe method for providing wastewater treatment: Cultec Chambers Z ❑ 12. a.Does the project site contain,or is it substantially contiguous to,a building,archaeological site,or district NO YES which is listed on the National or State Register of Historic Places,or that has been determined by the ❑ Commissioner of the NYS Office of Parks,Recreation and Historic Preservation to be eligible for listing on the State Register of Historic Places? b. Is the project site,or any portion of it,located in or adjacent to an area designated as sensitive for ❑ archaeological sites on the NY State Historic Preservation Office(SHPO)archaeological site inventory? 13. a. Does any portion of the site of the proposed action,or lands adjoining the proposed action,contain NO YES wetlands or other waterbodies regulated by a federal,state or local agency? ❑✓ ❑ b.Would the proposed action physically alter,or encroach into,any existing wetland or waterbody? ❑ If Yes,identify the wetland or waterbody and extent of alterations in square feet or acres: Page 2 of 3 14. Identify the typical habitat types that occur on,or are likely to be found on the project site.Check all that apply: ❑Shoreline ❑ Forest ❑Agricultural/grasslands ❑ Early mid-successional ❑Wetland ❑ Urban m Suburban 15. Does the site of the proposed action contain any species of animal,or associated habitats,listed by the State or NO YES Federal government as threatened or endangered? ❑ ❑ 16. Is the project site located in the 100-year flood plan? NO YES ❑✓ ❑ 17. Will the proposed action create storm water discharge,either from point or non-point sources? NO YES If Yes, ❑ Vf a. Will storm water discharges flow to adjacent properties? ❑✓ ❑ b. Will storm water discharges be directed to established conveyance systems(runoff and storm drains)? ❑ If Yes,briefly describe: Cultec Chambers 18. Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that would result in the impoundment of water NO YES or other liquids(e.g.,retention pond,waste lagoon,dam)? If Yes,explain the purpose and size of the impoundment: ❑ ❑ 19. Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the location of an active or closed solid waste NO YES management facility? If Yes,describe: 20.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the subject of remediation(ongoing or NO YES completed) for hazardous waste? If Yes,describe: ❑ ❑ I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Applicant/sponso me: I Sherman Date: 01/21/21 Signature: Title:Landscape Architect PRINT FORM Page 3 of 3 EAF Mapper Summary Report Friday, January 22, 2021 11:42 AM Disclaimer: The EAF Mapper is a screening tool intended to assist 135.43-1-171 •)35.43-1-12 1 35.43-1-111135.43-1-10`., 135.43-1-9135.43-1-21 project sponsors and reviewing agencies in preparing an environmental -- —� assessment form(EAF).Not all questions asked in the EAF are +135.43-1-5.26/ I answered by the EAF Mapper.Additional information on any EAF f I I 1 35.43 1-524135.43 1-5.25 question can be obtained by consulting the EAF Workbooks. Although 35.43-1 52 31 I Ir I 135.43-1-5.1 I the EAF Mapper provides the most up-to-date digital data available to DEC,you may also need to contact local or other data sources in order 135.43-1-5.27 to obtain data not provided by the Mapper.Digital data is not a substitute for agency determinations. It 135.43-1-5.2 5 - 135.43-1-5.38135.43-1-5.3,135.43-1-5.40 -- Ottawa �oeted � Hwon n h.liin ye 135.43-1-5.3 135.43-13. �' Toronto J 135.43 1 5.32 35.43-1-5.31135.43-1-15.30 __-1 -1-2 5 a ! Rochester Rod Moor or �`135.43-1-5.4'I P3rvNloe AN �CIerB�nd_._. 35.43-1-5.10 35.43�.43-1-5.8 I� ! A r�nn 1. a Y� 135.$3-1-5.7135i43-1-5.6135.43-1 .5., 13S.43-1 2; nPIt brit PIMYadrpMia mtlrr VSS Irerrn ap1NZ cat sti 1ari MET],Esq Chhiruw(Hong kor>� sp- �'hNTP, Ca Esri ark METT,fsn China(Hong Kant,Ese ; i fTf bM1:1 .'k1�e0ftpW*4b�Fars,�ndttK-CASUser Coromunfty .c(a+ftad`b`ed141a1ltOta pb a GIS UserCammtstty Part 1 /Question 7 [Critical Environmental No Area] Part 1 /Question 12a [National or State No Register of Historic Places or State Eligible Sites] Part 1 /Question 12b [Archeological Sites] No Part 1 /Question 13a [Wetlands or Other No Regulated Waterbodies] Part 1 /Question 15 [Threatened or No Endangered Animal] Part 1 /Question 16[100 Year Flood Plain] No Part 1 /Question 20[Remediation Site] No Short Environmental Assessment Form - EAF Mapper Summary Report 110 ° ■ � ^ ) < � �__ a_»a< �\ » - \ � qr - _� - � \ . U � .. � � � f \ � } � | . � , , , , , , � k * � \ ƒ \ ( a I § \ X - ) ƒ / w Ix of Ix } � | | ■ � / \ \ \ ( \ co ix ( \ / \ \ ( ¥ , �\ 2 _ - -) \k }ƒ j( \ �) / \\ f) ) - �� � §{ \� d) k \\ \ k kE 2 ��� � ■ � \ { (f a; ;; \J }} \\ y CA 23 5 2) 2 2 3� « »z 2 3 ± E Hardesty 555 Theodore Fremd Ave.,Suite C-301 Rye, NY 10580 &Hanover T:914.967.6540 www.hardestyhanover.com MEMORANDUM C IE � V [E 03 To: Robert I. Goodman, Chairman, and the MAY - 7 2021 Planning Board of the Village of Rye Brook VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK BUILDING DEPARTMENT Date: May 7, 2021 - Subject: Wilk Residence— 16 Birch Lane—Application for Approval of a Site Plan and Steep Slopes Permit As requested,we have reviewed applications, correspondence and plans submitted by Daniel Sherman, RLA, on behalf of the property owners, Robert and Haley Wilk, for approval of a Site Plan and Steep Slopes Permit for the construction of an in-ground swimming pool, stone patio and wooden deck stairs within an area of moderate and very steep slopes on the property located at 16 Birch Lane, SBL 135.43-1-28 on the Town of Rye Tax Map, in the R-15 Zoning District. Property Description The 21,857 square-foot property is currently developed with a two-story residence, driveway and curb cut, and a flagstone patio in the rear of the residence. The property slopes down approximately 18 feet from a high point at western edge of Birch Lane front property line to the eastern edge of the property at front property line at Red Roof Drive. Areas of regulated steep slopes are located on the lot. Mature landscape trees and other plantings are located throughout the property. Review We have reviewed application materials and plans that include the following items: 1. Short Environmental Assessment Form dated 1/21/21 and EAF Mapper Summary Report dated 1/22/21; 2. Application for Site Plan Approval; 3. Site Plan Submittal Review Checklist; 4. Building Permit Check List& Zoning Analysis; 5. Notice of Disapproval prepared by Michael J. Izzo, Building Inspector, dated 2/25/21; 6. Exterior Building Permit Application; 7. The following engineering plans generally entitled, "Wilk Residence" prepared Christopher S. Utschig, PE, last revised 4/28/21: Hardesty &Hanover engineering that moves you a. Sheet 1 of 3, "Site Plan," b. Sheet 2 of 3, "Steep Slope and Impervious Coverage Plan," C. Sheet 3 of 3, "Construction Details;" 8. A plan entitled, "Landscape&Tree Protection Plan," prepared by Daniel Sherman, RLA, dated 5/3/21; 9. A plan entitled "Topographic Survey" prepared by Ahneman Kirby, dated 10/29/21, Please note that our review is limited to planning and environmental issues. We offer the following comments regarding the application: 1. SEQRA. The Proposed Action is a Type II action with regard to SEQR because it involves the construction of minor accessory/appurtenant residential structures, including garages, carports, patios, decks, swimming pools, tennis courts, satellite dishes, fences, barns, storage sheds or other buildings not changing land use or density. 2. Topographic Survey. The site survey needs to be signed and sealed by the Land Surveyor. 3. Steep Slopes Permit. Construction of the swimming pool and pool deck will require disturbance of existing 778-square foot area of steep slopes (15-25%) on the property. The area of steep slopes is proposed to be graded for the installation of the pool and pool deck and will be supported by a retaining wall that varies from 1 foot to 4 feet in height. Approval of a steep slopes work permit will require compliance of all grading and filling with the requirements of Chapter 213 of the Village Code. We look forward to discussion with the Board. Sarah L. Brown, AICP Senior Planner cc: Honorable Mayor and the Village Board of Trustees Christopher Bradbury, Village Administrator Michal Nowak, Superintendent of Public WorksNillage Engineer Jennifer L. Gray, Esq., Village Attorney Daniel Sherman, RLA, for the Applicant YASharedlOfficesWYR\DataOocumentsCOCS215001RyeBrook4979.0416 Birch Lane pme2.docx Hardesty 555 Theodore Fremd Ave.,Suite C-301 Rye, NY 10580 &Hanover T:914.967.6540 www.hardestyhanover.com MEMORANDUM D To: Robert I. Goodman, Chairman, and the MAR - 5 2021 Planning Board of the Village of Rye Brook VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK Date: March 5, 2021 1 BUILDING DEPARTMENT Subject: Wilk Residence— 16 Birch Lane—Application for Approval of a Site Plan and Steep Slopes Permit As requested,we have reviewed applications, correspondence and plans submitted by Daniel Sherman, RLA, on behalf of the property owners, Robert and Haley Wilk, for approval of a Site Plan and Steep Slopes Permit for the construction of an in-ground swimming pool, stone patio and wooden deck stairs within an area of moderate and very steep slopes on the property located at 16 Birch Lane, SBL 135.43-1-28 on the Town of Rye Tax Map, in the R-15 Zoning District. Property Description The 21,857 square-foot property is currently developed with a two-story residence, driveway and curb cut, and a flagstone patio in the rear of the residence. The property slopes down approximately 18 feet from a high point at western edge of Birch Lane front property line to the eastern edge of the property at front property line at Red Roof Drive. Areas of regulated steep slopes are located on the lot. Mature landscape trees and other plantings are located throughout the property. Review We have reviewed application materials and plans that include the following items: 1. Short Environmental Assessment Form dated 1/21/21 and EAF Mapper Summary Report dated 1/22/21; 2. Application for Site Plan Approval; 3. Site Plan Submittal Review Checklist; 4. Building Permit Check List&Zoning Analysis; 5. Notice of Disapproval prepared by Michael J. Izzo, Building Inspector, dated 2/25/21; 6. Exterior Building Permit Application; 7. The following engineering plans generally entitled, "Wilk Residence" prepared Christopher S. Utschig, PE, last revised 2/16/21: Hardesty &Hanover engineering that moves you a. Sheet 1 of 3, "Site Plan," b. Sheet 2 of 3, "Steep Slope and Impervious Coverage Plan," C. Sheet 3 of 3, "Construction Details;" 8. A plan entitled "Topographic Survey" prepared by Ahneman Kirby, dated 10/29/21. Please note that our review is limited to planning and environmental issues. We offer the following comments regarding the application: 1. SEQRA. The Proposed Action is a Type II action with regard to SEQR because it involves the construction of minor accessory/appurtenant residential structures, including garages, carports, patios, decks, swimming pools, tennis courts, satellite dishes, fences, barns, storage sheds or other buildings not changing land use or density. 2. Topographic Survey. The site survey needs to be signed and sealed by the Land Surveyor. 3. Landscaping.A Landscaping Plan should be included in the plan set. The plan should show existing and proposed landscaping. Based on aerials of the site, it appears that existing landscaping will need to be removed for the installation of the construction entrance. Any landscaping to be removed should also be noted on the Landscaping Plan. 4. Tree Preservation and Protection. A survey of existing regulated trees on the property should be provided to comply with the requirements of Chapter 235 of the Village Code. The site plan or a tree removal plan should provide a tree survey and clearly show the locations of all the existing regulated trees on the lot (including size, species and condition), and all trees to be removed during construction. Required tree protection measures to be installed during construction for all trees to remain should be shown on the plans. The site plan also should include the standard Rye Brook tree protection details and notes included in Chapter 235. Depending upon the sizes of the trees to be removed, replacement trees may be required. The replacement trees should be added to the landscape plan. 5. Construction Entrance. The location of the construction tracking pad conflicts with the existing retaining wall. The plans should be revised to adjust the location. We also question of the construction tracking pad could be moved to the left of the existing streetlight. It appears that more of the existing trees and shrubs could be avoided if the entrance was relocated to this area. 6. Impervious Surfaces. The impervious surface calculation plan denotes the area in the front yard along Birch Lane between the front walkway and driveway as impervious surface. We question why this area has been calculated as impervious when there is not construction or disturbance noted on the site plan. Hardesty &Hanover engineenng that moves you 7. Steep Slopes Permit. Construction of the swimming pool and pool deck will require disturbance of existing 778-square foot area of steep slopes (15-25%) on the property. The area of steep slopes is proposed to be graded for the installation of the pool and pool deck and will be supported by a retaining wall that varies from 1 foot to 4 feet in height. Approval of a steep slopes work permit will require compliance of all grading and filling with the requirements of Chapter 213 of the Village Code. We look forward to discussion with the Board. Sarah L. Brown, AICP Senior Planner cc: Honorable Mayor and the Village Board of Trustees Christopher Bradbury, Village Administrator Michal Nowak, Superintendent of Public Works/Village Engineer Jennifer L. Gray, Esq., Village Attorney Daniel Sherman, RLA, for the Applicant Y:1ShamdlOfficesWYROata\Documents\DOCS21600\RyeBrook14979.0416 Binh Lane pmet.docx NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Public Notice is hereby given for a Site Plan and Steep Slopes Permit applications submitted to the Village of Rye Brook Planning Board. The matter is scheduled for a Public Hearing before the Planning Board on May 13, 2021 at 7:30 p.m., at Rye Brook Village Hall, 938 King Street. Owner: Robert Wilk & Haley Wilk Applicant: Christopher S. Utschig, P.E. Premises: 16 Birch Lane (Parcel ID# 135.43-1-5.28) Application: Review of a Site Plan and Steep Slopes Permit Applications for the proposed in-ground swimming pool with pool patio, pool equipment, pool fence and wood deck. The May 13, 2021 the Planning Board meeting will be held via videoconferencing and in-person, if permitted by the Governor's Executive Orders. The public will have an opportunity to see and hear the meeting live and provide comments. Further information on in-person attendance, if permitted, will be available on the Village website. The public can watch the live meeting on Cable TV, online from the Public Meetings link on the Village website (www.ryebrook.org), and through the Zoom App. If any interested members of the public would like to provide comments on an application, comments can be called in during the meeting at +1 (929) 205-6099, Meeting ID: 864 2184 3540 or provided through the written chat section of the Zoom meeting. Comments can also be emailed before and during the public hearing to Michal Nowak, Village Superintendent of Public Works, at mnowak@ryebrook.org. Please check the meeting Agenda posted on the Village website for further instructions to access the virtual meeting and for updated information. Additional information is available at the Rye Brook Engineering Department at (914) 939-0753. April 8, 2021 Approved 4-0 RESOLUTION SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING SITE PLAN AND STEEP SLOPES PERMIT APPROVAL FOR 16 BIRCH LANE VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK PLANNING BOARD WHEREAS, the Applicant, Daniel Sherman, RLA, on behalf of the Property Owners, Robert and Haley Wilk, has submitted an Application for approval of a Site Plan and Steep Slopes Permit for the construction of an in-ground swimming pool, stone patio and wooden deck stairs within an area of moderate and very steep slopes on the property located at 16 Birch Lane, SBL 135.43-1-28 on the Town of Rye Tax Map, in the R-15 Zoning District: and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Planning Board of the Village of Rye Brook will hold a public hearing on May 13, 2021 at 7:30 p.m. via videoconference in accordance with the requirements of the Zoning Code of the Village of Rye Brook and the Governor's Executive Orders which suspends the "in-person" requirements of the NYS Open Meetings Law and provides alternative means by which to conduct public meetings and hearings, to consider the above- referenced application; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Applicant is hereby directed to comply with Section 250-40 of the Village Code regarding notification of the public hearing. On motion by Mrs. Schoen, seconded by Mr. Morlino, Mr. Nowak, Superintendent of Public Works, called the roll: MR. GRZAN Voting Yes MR. MORLINO Voting Yes MRS. SCHOEN Voting Yes MR. TARTAGLIA Voting Excused CHAIRMAN GOODMAN Voting Yes Y:ISharedlOfficesWYROataLocuments\DOCS215001RyeBrook116 Birch Lane PHResolution Dratdocx DANIEL SHERMAN LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, P.C. 4 Broadway, Suite 9 Valhalla, NY 10595 914-824-0999 Fax: 914-824-0251 dsherman4@optonline.net www.donshermanlandscape.com March 3, 2021 MAR -3 2021 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK BUILDING DEPARTMENT Re: Sign Posting for Planning Board review re: 16 Birch Lane for the meeting of March 11, 2021 This letter will confirm that the public notice sign for the planning board was posted on the front of the property on Birch Lane and Red Roof Dr on March 3rd, 2021. Respectfully, Daniel Sherman Landscape Architect 1 J � . /•�a f I tV i 4 7 i l>U'Ra� FW � 4 Ski ' Gr V t -�,� !: 'n•'+,.'4���-��G=,�� \. 1' -`� �' 11` �, '�'' `fit' s.�1> � �„ •��{> +.�:� of-,,ti,� i�, -� .w�,j;+ :a W 17 z = - _ r L1J o ; ..- 3m � pZ>� U Q O ¢ d ow- 0 - 4 QZNgWQw ' .. Z Z F 2 N W O > N v 0 i W3ZNuzo� Z ��; � pg,y W W OZOZm _ f V ~ OY = LL Oco °�° " a oa \\ asm ¢ u0 �� o ?O c. UEL .2 020a O i Q n �' - � 1 I f•} r i 1 ' r J � i DANIEL SHERMAN LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, P.C. 4 Broadway, Suite 9 Valhalla, NY 10595 914-824-0999 Fax: 914-824-0251 dsherman4@?optonline.net www.danshe D ODIC MAY - 4 2021 May 41h, 2021 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK BUILDING DEPARTMENT Re: Mailing Notification for the Planning Board Public Hearing review re: 16 Birch Lane for the meeting of May 13, 2021 This letter will confirm that the neighbor mailing notification for the Planning Board was mailed on April 22nd, 2021. Respectfully, Daniel Sherman Landscape Architect Mailing Labels for Property Addresses.Created from Municipal Tax Parcel Viewer. http://giswww.westchestergov.ccm Taylor Laurence-Martha W Taylor Mallah Lloyd-Marnie Mallah Jaccoma,Brian-Sharon Jaccoma 20 Red Roof Dr 17 Birch Ln 19 Birch Ln PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 Rosenzweig,Erika B-Robert Goldstein Ira-Sandra Goldstein Kaye,Eric Rosenzweig 5 James Way 22 Red Roof Dr 200 N Ridge St PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 Wong,Steven-Pei Hsuan Huang Shaw Joshua-Melissa Shaw Nagia,Naresh-Geeta Nagia 202 N Ridge St 12 Birch Ln 26 Red Roof Dr PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 Lovallo,Pat Figueroa,Liadel-Keith Conover Fay,Guy-Marilyn Fay 177 N Ridge St 181 N Ridge St 185 N Ridge St PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 Gottlieb,Peter-Roberta Gottlieb Werlinich,Gregory Lipschultz Brent S-Ilyssa S Lipschultz 15 Red Roof Dr 14 Birch Ln 24 Red Roof Dr PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 Shiffman,David-Deborah Shiffman Epstein,Kara Williams James-Latoya Moore 11 Red Roof Dr 10 Birch Ln 9 Berkley Ln PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 Sakofsky Evan-Sari Sakofsky Wu Yinghao-Mingzhi Chen Zaccagnino,Joseph-Estate ofMary 11 Berkley Ln 15 Berkley Ln Zaccagnino Trust PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 175 N Ridge St PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 Lungariello Michael Jr-Veronica L Zottola,Arthur T-Laura Zottola Wilk Robert-Haley Wilk Lungariello 301 Betsy Brown Rd 16 Birch Ln 18 Red Roof Dr PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 Vickers Adam-Jodi Vickers Louis,Howard-Barbara Louis 28 Red Roof Dr 21 Birch Ln PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 Created on: 1/22/2021 Page 1 of 1 DANIEL SHERMAN LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, P.C. 4 Broadway, Suite 9 Valhalla, NY 10595 914-824-0999 Fax: 914-824-0251 dsherman4@optonline.net www.danshermonlandscape.com DCECIEME May 5, 2021 MAY - 5 2021 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK BUILDING DEPARTMENT Re: Sign Posting for Planning Board review re: 16 Birch Lane for the meeting of May 5, 2021 This letter will confirm that the public notice sign for the planning board was posted on the front of the property on Birch Lane and Red Roof Or on May 4th, 2021. Respectfully, Daniel Sherman Landscape Architect p. N d' > Z �LL W z I Z r V gm o a O =m�?W t7W a r umzai!^g as� _z w3zrUz NZZ<U �o g zecSi oo_ Yg _ m Q a m f o F i o raW soo_ci a m v j - J JJ_j ! ,, J_JJJJ i� 4 + 1 AVE 10 6,1 AII� In Li Ns r gff 'i �� r • x ZD02, 'S 14. mw IW �� .� �,�►"� it 'r � ., 'bw � �, �'a �`�• _.,5 . fir' f ,n,"'j� � . ,t'��i.• '�. .., , Tara Gerardi From: Michal Nowak Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2021 3:57 PM To: Tara Gerardi Subject: Fwd: Planning Board Meeting 4111121 - 16 Birch Lane - Wilk Residence H Sent from my iPhone MAR 1 1 2021 Begin forwarded message: VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK From: Adam Vickers<adamvickers@mac.com> BUILDING DEPARTMENT Date: March 11, 2021 at 3:27:11 PM EST To: Michal Nowak<MNowak@ rye brook.org> Cc: Haleyswilk@yahoo.com, Chris@stevenscompanies.org Subject: Planning Board Meeting 4/11/21 - 16 Birch Lane -Wilk Residence Mr. Nowak: I am unable to attend tonight's meeting of the Village Planning Board regrading the above referenced application but I wanted to provide comments for this application. My property is located adjacent to the Applicant's on 28 Red Roof Drive and the improvements to their property will be closest to my lot. I have spoken with the Applicant and their Engineer who has submitted the site plan and there is only one issue I believe needs to be addressed at this time which relates to the retaining wall which is located near the property line (which for reference is listed as a block wall on the survey). Since the property slopes into the retaining wall my concern is if the construction will cause any type of compromise of the structure. If an engineers inspection and sign off of the integrity of the wall relating to the construction, or something similar could be obtained, (which the applicant's engineer has told me he would be willing to do), I would be satisfied and have no further issues relating to approval at this time. If You or the members of the Planning Board have any additional questions please feel free to contact me. Adam Vickers 1 RECEIVED VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK OCT - b 2021 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE RESOLUTION WHEREAS, on April 6, 2021 the Village of Rye Brook Zoning Board of Appeals granted Robert Wilk & Haley Wilk (the "Applicants") (1) relief from Village Code § 224-7.D which states that no pool or associated structures or equipment shall be located in any front yard as defined in Chapter 250, Zoning; (2) a Total Impervious Coverage variance of 1,578 square feet where the maximum allowable Total Impervious Coverage for this property is 7,005 square feet pursuant to Village Code § 250-37.C; and (3) a Front Yard Impervious Coverage variance of 4.2% where the maximum allowable Front Yard Impervious Coverage is 35% pursuant to Village Code § 250-37.13, in connection with the proposed construction of an in-ground swimming pool and swimming pool patio in the front yard of the property at the Red Roof Drive elevation, at 16 Birch Lane, in an R-15 zoning district on the south east side of Birch Lane, approximately 600 feet from the intersection of Old Orchard Road and Birch Lane. Said premises being known and designated on the tax map of the Village of Rye Brook as Parcel ID# 135.43-1-5.28; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Board is in receipt of an email from Haley Wilk, dated September 20, 2021 requesting an extension of the variance for another six (6)months; and WHEREAS, the Applicant needs more time to start the project due to the availability of material and contractors; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Board has the authority pursuant to Village Code § 250-13.H to grant an extension of the original variance approval for an additional six (6) months if the applicant demonstrates that there is a good cause for an extension. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Village of Rye Brook Zoning Board hereby grants a six (6) month extension of the variance referenced herein for property located at 16 Birch Lane to expire on April 5, 2022 unless a building permit is issued prior to April 5, 2022. 1313/008/4846-7701-8846v1 1015121 I' 1 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, except as specifically modified by the amendment contained herein, the Zoning Board of Appeals Resolution dated April 6, 2021, and the conditions set forth therein, is otherwise to remain in full force and effect. Dated: October 5, 2021 yy� Mr. Don Moscato, Chairman Mr. Moscato called the roll: Steven Berger Voting: f!w c'-,S Glenn Brettschneider Voting: Y$S Jamie Schutzer Voting: `/ S Joel Simon Voting: z S Don Moscato Voting: �(r 13131008/4846-7701-8846vl 1015121 DI CEWE VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK APR - 8 2021 D) ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS RESOLUTION VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE WHEREAS, application has been made to the Zoning Board by Robert Wilk& Haley Wilk(the "Applicants") for(1) relief from Village Code § 224-7.D which states that no pool or associated structures or equipment shall be located in any front yard as defined in Chapter 250, Zoning; (2) a Total Impervious Coverage variance of 1,578 square feet where the maximum allowable Total Impervious Coverage for this property is 7,005 square feet pursuant to Village Code § 250-37.C; and (3) a Front Yard Impervious Coverage variance of 4.2%where the maximum allowable Front Yard Impervious Coverage is 35% pursuant to Village Code § 250-37.13, in connection with the proposed construction of an in-ground swimming pool and swimming pool patio in the front yard of the property at the Red Roof Drive elevation, at 16 Birch Lane, in an R-15 zoning district on the south east side of Birch Lane, approximately 600 feet from the intersection of Old Orchard Road and Birch Lane. Said premises being known and designated on the tax map of the Village of Rye Brook as Parcel ID# 135.43-1-5.28; and WHEREAS, a duly advertised public hearing was held April 6, 2021, at which time all those wishing to be heard were given such opportunity; and WHEREAS,the public hearing was closed on April 6, 2021; and WHEREAS,the proposed action is a Type II action pursuant to the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act and accordingly, no further environmental review is required; and WHEREAS, the Board, from the application, after viewing the premises and neighborhood concerned, and upon considering each of the factors set forth in Village Code § 250-13(G)(b)[2][a]-[e] of the Rye Brook Code, finds: 1) The variances WILL NOT create an adverse impact to the character of the neighborhood; 2) The benefit the Applicants seek CANNOT be achieved through another method, feasible for the Applicants to pursue, that does not require the variances; 3) The variances ARE substantial; 4) The variances WILL NOT create any adverse impacts to the physical or environmental conditions of the neighborhood; and 5) The need for the variances IS self-created. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED that the said application for(1)relief from Village Code § 224-7.1) which states that no pool or associated structures or equipment shall be located in any front yard as defined in Chapter 250, Zoning; (2) a Total Impervious Coverage variance of 1,578 square feet where the maximum allowable Total Impervious Coverage for this property is 7,005 square feet pursuant to Village Code§250-37.C;and(3)a Front Yard Impervious Coverage variance of 4.2%where the maximum allowable Front Yard Impervious Coverage is 35% pursuant to Village Code § 250-37.1), in connection with the proposed construction of an in-ground swimming pool and swimming pool patio in the front yard of the property at the Red Roof Drive elevation, at 16 Birch Lane, is hereby GRANTED on the following conditions: 1) No permit or certificate of occupancy shall be issued until the Applicants have paid in full all application and consultant fees incurred by the Village in connection with the review of this application. 2) The Applicant shall prepare a stormwater management plan for the project, subject to review and approval by the Village Superintendent of Public Works. Dated: April 6, 2021 Don Moscato Mr. Don Moscato, Chairman Mr. Moscato called the roll: Steven Berger Voting: Aye Glenn Brettschneider Voting: Aye Jamie Schutzer Voting: Aye Joel Simon Voting: Aye Don Moscato Voting: Aye i i �y Dil 'K VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK MAYOR 938 King Street, Rye Brook, N.Y. 10573 ADMINISTRATOR Paul S. Rosenberg (914)939-0668 Fax(914)939-5801 Christopher J. Bradbury ww-'.ryebrook.ore TRUSTEES BUILDING 3 FIRE Susan R.Epstein INSPECTOR Stephanie J. Fischer Michael J. Izzo David M.Heiser Jason A. Klein NOTICE OF HEARING ON APPLICATION Rotice is hereby given that the undersigned has filed an application to appear before the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Rye Brook. Application # 21-001 Applicant: Robert Wilk& Haley Wilk 16 Birch Lane Rye Brook,New York 10573 Applicant Proposes to: Construct an in-ground swimming pool with pool patio, pool equipment, pool fence and wood deck. At the premises known as 16 Birch Lane in the Village of Rye Brook,New York,situated on the south east side of Birch Lane, approximately 600 feet from the intersection of Old Orchard Road and Birch Lane, designated and shown on the most current tax map as Parcel ID# 135.43-1-5.28,the applicant does hereby request a variance(s) from the following applicable section(s)of the Zoning Ordinance: 5224-7.D. No pool or associated structures or equipment shall be located in any front yard as defined in the chapter 250, Zoning. The applicant proposes to install the in-ground swimming pool and the swimming pool patio in the front yard of the property at the Red Roof Drive elevation. Therefore, relief from this section of the code is requested. S250-37.C. The maximum allowable Total Impervious Coverage for this property is 7,005 square feet. The proposed pool and pool patio will result in a Total Impervious Coverage of 8,583 square feet. Therefore, a Total Impervious Coverage variance of 1,578 square feet is requested. 5250-37.D. The maximum allowable Front Yard Impervious coverage is 35%. The proposed pool and patio will result in a Front Yard Impervious Coverage of 39.2%. Therefore, a Front Yard Impervious Coverage variance of 4.2% is requested. Z1 public hearing on said application will be held before the Village Zoning Board of Appeals on Tuesday, April 6,2021,at 8 o'clock p.m.at the Village of Rye Brook Offices located at 938 King Street,Rye Brook, NY 10573. Plans and other materials associated with the proposed application may be reviewed and downloaded via the Public Meetings&Video link from the Rye Brook website homepage and are available for review at the Building Department. The April 6,2021 Zoning Board of Appeals meeting will be held via videoconferencing and in-person, if permitted by the Governor's Executive Orders.The public will have an opportunity to see and hear the meeting live and provide comments. Further information on in-person attendance, if permitted, will be available on the Village website. The public can watch the live meeting on Cable TV, online from the Public Meetings link on the Village website (www.rvebrook.orp- , and through the Zoom App. If any interested members of the public would like to provide comments on an application, comments can be called in during the meeting at+1 (929)205-6099,Meeting ID: 8516097 6834 or provided through the written chat section of the Zoom meeting. Comments can also be provided via email before and during the meeting to Michael Izzo, Village Building Inspector,at mizzo(a!ryebrook.ore. Please check the meeting Agenda posted on the Village website for further instructions to access the virtual meeting and for updated information. Plans and other materials associated with the proposed application may be reviewed and downloaded via the Public Meetings& Video link from the Rye Brook website. Dated: I L�"I Christopher J: Bradbu illage Clerk BUILDING DEPARTMENT n 7 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK -- 938 KING STREET RYE BROOK,NY 10573 to MAR 15 2021 PHONE (914) 939-0668- FAX (914) 939-5801 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK www.ryebrook.org I BUILDING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Application Fee: $350.00 V(paid • Escrow Fee: $1,000.00 (, paid Date: 3 '��-'� L♦ ****************************************************************************** Subject Property: i(O StQC+1 L.AL1E Parcel ID#: 1.15.L41-1-5•ZF5 Zone: ass_ Property Owner: 0BP¢r + B tle' i Li-A .1X Address:It, NeCt1 1tauE I IZ�r-- F42OCK Phone#:QI-1-��2R-P3 3-1 Cell#: email: "0 L9J l.!_)1 uC.(P IN-W•Coe"ra Applicant:T�A►►ItEL e iAG1ZrnA►J Address: LA Stott -09,',AALf4At.tA PA Phone#: %k4-BQLA- Cf_-0() Cell M 914- OPT email: hAlt.�ay�N E rt lA�I�rAP�(? Attorney/Agent: Address: 4m A tl•tom 1 Phone#: Cell#: email: The applicant named herein does hereby request an appeal from the decision made by the Building Inspector on an application dated '&U. t Z , 20 Z O , whereby the Building Inspector did: Grant: ( )/Deny: ()o the applicant a permit for per► W- 62"D 4Wt wUu ioGC P4GL %0(4 V400L- PA,O 1. Type of Appeal: (x)Variance to the Zoning Ordinance ( )Interpretation of the Zoning Ordinance ( ) Certification for Continuation of a Nonconforming Use ( ) Permit for Occupancy ( ) Permit for Use 2. This application relates to: ( Use (x)Area ( )Height ( )Setback ( )Other: In connection with: ( )A Proposed Building ()�)An Existing Building 3. Previous Appeaks); ( )Have (X)Have Not been made with respect to this particular decision of the Building Inspector, and ( )Have (x)Have Not been made with respect to any other previous decision(s) made by the Building Inspector regarding the subject property. List All Previous Zoning Appeals Either Granted or Denied Concerning the Subiect Property a. A requested variance was ( )Granted/( )Denied on application# dated, for, b. A requested variance was ( )Granted/( )Denied on application# dated, for, c. A requested variance was ( )Granted/( )Denied on application# dated, for, 1 (Use additional sheets if necessary) 3/21/19 4. Alteration: If work constitutes an alteration or extension to an existing building, describe briefly: 5. Construction Cost: What is the estimated cost of the proposed work? $ F'S0, C)()Q 6. Reasons for Appeal: A. An Area Variance to the Zoning Ordinance is requested because strict application of the ordinance would create the following hardship: -kr---PPS P-FAj`f i 5 (JNVc,c%4 L 1 tI -1HAI �1� R Pr12 PRE (2� L_ r 2o�.r5rzkltib Ryyr n �it�,l>1�.� vo fit-( -f Wz� �f'�or���' �5, .4- i�F�►'�-�- B. An Interpretation of the Zoninu Ordinance is requested because: C. A Use Variance to the Zoning Ordinance is requested because strict application of the ordinance would create the following hardship: 2 (Use additional sheets if necessary) 3/21/19 7. Requested Zonine Appeals: I. Section of Rye Brook Code: § Z Z4 --1 • D Zoning Requirement: OQ tP_ Cyr r� Y,ara� STRt - � 02 � .y�vrn lcr rt S�t1/4� C3E LACAiTan, ►►J ALN FRCw-C '-IARA Proposed Work: t kln 1 ArY1rY1►o L. fMC) Requested Variance: ►-VSTAP, AQ 1L-1 62CLAZ�t l v-Arni,r, 20a + 5��►�ry�n�.�C, 'Y!_ D"O ►"-rH cz I-gctL 1f A QjrD +7-F TNg A'aC A-r'RG7 Qs-z;p efrir- UQ 1 gr< -v Fsr►� II. Section of Rye Brook Code: § Z� -3-1 C, - Zoning Requirement: IV\A-l%MUN► Pr-2mm•ga> t►•nQesczv%cuZ,, CaERAGe F(M-T1-N°_ PQ09eO I OS, 1-CX25 Proposed Work: I�4 -C-,QC J,t ~tLr:j PIODL . PtYL D%C) Requested Variance: JkA9Gn\11ct,)5 CO3L02 6E TC) $tG &5�SF III. Section of Rye Brook Code: § 2-150 -3-1 -t> Zoning Requirement:MGgj ant m 3 4uIA, ZC t p 1 nnC-`?y�� �-X2 CACi ��FRC1�m�1AQDb 1r02 '[i-1►t P(�C`JDECa•L�l 1S �'1 Proposed Work: -PgciwL-p 10- L-,¢OU-3p SW1mmk-kN �� + �Z7�- ►�r1Q Requested Variance: FQ,gAtc s4AQD %rnQe-[Zt.1cA ),% Calr-VAGrx nF "3�i•Z 1 IV. Section of Rye Brook Code: § Zoning Requirement: Proposed Work: Requested Variance: V. Section of Rye Brook Code: § Zoning Requirement: Proposed Work: Requested Variance: 3 (Use additional sheets if necessary) 3/21/19 8. Item checklist of information from instruction sheet: (-4) Letter of Disapproval (y) Properly Completed & Signed Original Zoning Variance Application (X) Two (2) Sets of Sealed Plans (x) Non-refundable Application Fee of S350.00 (X) Escrow Account Fee of S 1,000.00 ( ) Provisions of any deeds, covenants, easements or restrictions affecting the kind of improvements allowed or prohibited upon the premises. ( ) Notarized Mailer& Sign Affidavits, Area Map & Public Notification List (Please note that the notarized affidavits must be received by the Building Department by no later than the Thursday prior to the scheduled zoning hearing) *********************************************************************************************************** This application must include the notarized signature(s) of the applicant of record as well that of the legal owner(s) of the subject property in the spaces provided below. Any application not properly signed shall be deemed null and void and will be returned to the applicant. STATE OF NEW YORK,COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER ) as: Ora,LIIELSiVERMN ,being duly sworn, deposes and states that he/she is the applicant above named, (print name of individual signing as the applicant) and further states that (s)he is the legal owner of the property to which this application pertains, or that (s)he is the I AkkQ5Mpv--- AM4ma for the legal owner and is duly authorized to make and file this application. (indicate architect,contractor,agent,attorney,etc.) That all statements contained herein are true to the best of his/her knowledge and belief, and that any work performed or use conducted at the above captioned property will be in conformance with the determination of, and any conditions set by the Rye Brook Zoning Board of Appeals, with the details as set forth and contained in this application and in any accompanying approved plans and specifications, as well as in accordance with the New York State Uniform Fire Prevention & Building Code, the Code of the Village of Rye Brook and all other applicable laws, ordinances and regulations. Sworn to before me this Z Sworn to before me this 1 E5 day of ►MA2CN , 20 21 day of WAR Z %A , 20 ZI Not ' Public Notary c Signature of Property Owner Signa of Applicant NGuN-- ( tu( DAQISL -k-A r=RMA;J Print Name of Property Owner Print Name of Applicant 4 3/21/19 Qy C�CttJ J v . 19 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK MAYOR 938 King Street, Rye Brook, N.Y. 10573 ADMINISTRATOR Paul S. Rosenberg (914) 939-0668 Fax(914) 939-5801 Christopher J. Bradbury www.ryeb rook.ore TRUSTEES BUILDING&FIRE Susan R. Epstein INSPECTOR Stephanie J. Fischer Michael J. Izzo David M. Heiser Jason A. Klein NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL Application # 21-001 February 25, 2021 Robert Wilk & Haley Wilk 16 Birch Lane Rye Brook, New York 10573 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that your application dated November 12,2020,for a building permit to construct an in-ground swimming pool and swimming pool patio for the premises located at 16 Birch Lane, Parcel ID# 135.43-1-5.28, has been disapproved because of non-compliance with the following section(s) of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook: 9224-7.D. No pool or associated structures or equipment shall be located in any front yard as defined in the chapter 250, Zoning. The applicant proposes to install the in-ground swimming pool and the swimming pool patio in the front yard of the property at the Red Roof Drive elevation. §250-37.C. The maximum allowable Total Impervious Coverage for this property is 7,005 square feet. The proposed pool and pool patio will result in a Total Impervious Coverage of 8,583 square feet. 5250-37.D. The maximum allowable Front Yard Impervious Coverage is 35%. The proposed pool and patio will result in a Front Yard Impervious Coverage of 39.2%. Please revise your plans to fully comply with the applicable section(s) of Village Code, or an appeal to this decision may be brought before the Village Zoning Board of Appeals(ZBA)in accordance with§250-13 and §250-40 of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook. Applications to appear before the ZBA are available at the Building Department or online at www.ryebrook.org. Sincerely, Michael J. Izzo Building & Fire Inspector mizzo(a-)ryebrook.org DANIEL SHERMAN LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, P.C. 4 Broadway, Suite 9 Valhalla, NY 10595 914-824-0999 Fax: 914-824-0251 dsherman4@optonline.net www.donshermanlandscape.com March 26, 2021 Re: Mailing Notification for Zoning Board review re: 16 Birch Lane for the meeting of April 6, 2021 This letter will confirm that the neighbor mailing notification for the zoning board was mailed on March 26" 2021. Respectfully, D [ `( F � V IE Daniel Sherman MAR 2 6 2021 03 Landscape Architect VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK BUILDING DEPARTMENT Mailing Labels for Property Addresses.Created from Municipal Tax Parcel Viewer. http Ilgiswww westchesteroov com GIS•�• �••••••a.�.# rJM Taylor Laurence-Martha W Taylor Mallah Lloyd-Marnie Mallah Jaccoma,Brian-Sharon Jaccoma 20 Red Roof Dr 17 Birch Ln 19 Birch Ln PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 Rosenzweig,Erika B-Robert Goldstein Ira-Sandra Goldstein Kaye,Eric Rosenzweig 5 James Way 22 Red Roof Dr 200 N Ridge St PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 Wong,Steven-Pei Hsuan Huang Shaw Joshua-Melissa Shaw Nagia,Naresh-Geeta Nagia 202 N Ridge St 12 Birch Ln 26 Red Roof Dr PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 Lovallo,Pat Figueroa,Liadel-Keith Conover Fay,Guy-Marilyn Fay 177 N Ridge St 181 N Ridge St 185 N Ridge St PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 Gottlieb,Peter-Roberta Gottlieb Werlinich,Gregory Lipschultz Brent S-Ilyssa S Lipschultz 15 Red Roof Dr 14 Birch Ln 24 Red Roof Dr PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 Shiffman,David-Deborah Shiffman Epstein,Kara Williams James-Latoya Moore 11 Red Roof Dr 10 Birch Ln 9 Berkley Ln PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 Sakofsky Evan-Sari Sakofsky Wu Yinghao-Mingzhi Chen Zaccagnino,Joseph-Estate ofMary 11 Berkley Ln 15 Berkley Ln Zaccagnino Trust PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 175 N Ridge St PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 Lungariello Michael Jr-Veronica L Zottola,Arthur T-Laura Zottola Wilk Robert-Haley Wilk Lungariello 301 Betsy Brown Rd 16 Birch Ln 18 Red Roof Dr PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 Vickers Adam-Jodi Vickers Louis,Howard-Barbara Louis 28 Red Roof Dr 21 Birch Ln PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 Created on: 1/22/2021 Page 1 of 1 DANIEL SHERMAN LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, P.C. 4 Broadway, Suite 9 Valhalla, NY 10595 914-824-0999 Fax: 914-824-0251 dsherman4@optonline.net www.danshermanlandscape.com March 29, 2021 Re: Sign Posting for Zoning Board review re: 16 Birch Lane for the meeting of April 6, 2021 This letter will confirm that the public notice sign for the zoning board was posted on the front of the property on Birch Lane and Red Roof Dr on March 29rd, 2021. Respectfully, D LE C IE R V Daniel Sherman MAR 3 0 2021 Landscape Architect VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK BUILDING DEPARTMENT U.S. Postal bervice U.S. Postal Service"' CERTIFIED MAILO RECEIPT CERTIFIED MAIL"" RECEIPT Domestic Mail OnIV l7— ru Domestic Mail Only rU mour _I r-a Certifled Mail Fee -- co Certified Mall Fee $3, 0 0122 C3s rs ervicee eesfchackbmcaddw«�poprp) •0 s 1 i 11 ra Fxlra Services&Fees(check hms Heist rae,�q> fei" ; ❑Reium Receipt QwNeopy) S—_ ❑Return Receipt(hardcopyJ S ❑Return Receipt(eleetronlc) 3 Priibnrtrk p ❑Return Receipt(eiectronlc) S '$Lt.LILT — POetmvlt O . C3 Adult certified Mall Restricted Day 3 '.a' -iWr:, O ❑Candled Mal Resbicted Delivery S !! , Heat, , O ❑Adultt'iOWtureRequired S-_ O ❑Adult SlgrotumReculmd $ 7Y ff11j ftG �,n1L 9 Z 8 ": . ❑Adult Slpr•tve ReeMcted Delvary i O Postage _ ❑Adaftsl9na<ure Reetrlcted De�IveryS C3 ostag (� Postage $I I,�5 ,n s $ 03f�_6/?�Q12I ra ' - s Taylor Laurence-Martha W Taylor rru Louis, hUatd-Barbara Louis to 3 21 Birch Ln r-1 20 Red Roof Dr Ells PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 C33 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 ............ m o -------------- --------------- r` ------ PS Form - ,r April 2015PS Form :rr ADO 2015r Postal Postal CERTIFIED o RECEIPT CERTIFIED MAILP RECEIPT Ln DomesticI o I. Only P- M try• , J `p m t� s iyl` u�i $ i aw(d•ok heir,Awt'be as apprepMe) services 6 Face!check Ems add w u eper•prroW p ❑Re—Receipt oardcopy) 3 ❑Return Receipt(l•rdcopy) S OAR 2�F a ❑Retum Receipt leiecbarvo) 3 uI p v7 ❑Ratum Receipt Mectrono III .__. i Y , Q ❑certified Map R.etrlc ed Dafivay i i blllrl C p ❑certified Mau Restricted Delory s H•ra C3 ❑Adult SWneture Requied 3_ - \` C ❑Adult Sieoaturs Required $ ❑Adue slgnature Restricted Delray 3 ❑Adult 8lgneture Remloted Delivery s .:.1. . C3 Postage _ O Postage m m 6 - r-q r-1 TE ra d-Marnie Mallah Mallah Lloyd Jaccama,Brian-Sharon Jaccoma $ Y C 19 Birch Ln c 17 Birch Ln o PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 -------------- -------------- o Si PORT CHESTER,NY 10573 r` P- PS r tever�efor :rr r r Postal _ • a CE • . CERTIFIED MIL) RECEIPT, MAIL" RECEIPT o- Iemestic Mail ti I. mOnlyry For delivery information.visit our website, usps.c0m^. m {g! m Certified Ma8 Foe r-I Certified Mad Fee r-1 O C3 6 un eesk+«*bmt.akdb.«epprepwd �o� Ln services eesk�+t•r UK add M«�opapeaw. t t,t1 Cl Return Receipt(h•dcopy) Illt` rA ❑ m�e N ;pt 3 1�lat` r-� ❑Realm apt(ei Rec •cbanle) $ PoStmark 0 Posimedt r' C3 ❑ a cashed Mal Restricted 0*4ffY i - Here ❑Certified Mail Restricted Dovery $ C3 $ Here. 0 ❑AduAdultSlgeriute RagtdrRequiredf - C3 ❑Adult 9gnaturs Requred $ C3❑Adult gsseivte R«eeasa Deify"3 ❑Adult Slgnabas R«blctad DstMery' C3 Pasmae 0 Postage 1 m Mrq s ra Goldstein Ira-Sandra Goldstein ra s Rosenzweig,Erika B-Robert cc 5 James Way CO Rosenzweig r-1 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 ---------------- o S 200 N Ridge St r%- PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 ---------------- PS Form :rr r rr PS Form �. r rr • / ILostai service ■ , ■ ■ ■ , RECEIPT fTl Domestic Mail Only Domestic Mail Only ul For delivery information,viit our website at wiv.,musps.corril. For delivery information,visit our uvebsite at wil"v.usps.conl fti lti y, m m r9 Certified Mall Fee Certified Mail Fee E3 $ _..` E3 N Extra Services&Fees(check box,arm fee u approprWaJ tiw 1 Extra Services&Fees(check box,add faa es appropdare) ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) S 1 ❑Return Receipt(hardcopY) $ r-1 ❑Return Receipt alecirl $ _._., NAR l r-1 ❑Return Receipt(elechgnlc) $ _. ._Postmark O ❑Certifled Mail Restricted Delivery S _ Here 0 ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery $ {,i'e,�", Here Q ❑Adult Sgnature Required S O ❑Adult Signature Required $ ❑Adult Sigr.eture RaMcted Delivery$_- ❑Adult Signalure ReabiMed Delivery$ p Postage p Poetaga r-q r-q j Wong,Steven-Pei Hsuan Huang r ! Kaye,Eric 202 N Ridge St E 22 Red Roof Dr PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 —"—'" - C3 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 — tt (`- :11 April 2019111' :11 April 2015 Postal Postal CERTIFIED MAILO' RECEIPT CERTIFIED MAILD RECEIPT Domestic Mail Only Domestic Mail Only For delivery infortualion,visit our website at tvivwusps.corl h 'CertMed Mall FeaCertified Mail Fee : o $ o $ ~�` U7 Extra Services&Fees A;;; bar,arm lee as Extra Services Fees(check box,add has as aWroprlata) ex>proprute) / Jj�7 ❑Rehim Receipt RrerdcoRYl S ..'I *R,2 C 202+ � ❑Retum Receipt(nardcopY) $ -� *�U[ ' Q ❑Return Receipt(electronic) $_ 1 PO$b (, ❑Return Receipt(electronic) $ I ❑Cenifled Mall Restricted Delivery 5 O ❑Cartrfied Mail ReeNcbd Delivery $ .SvM - •� Here ❑ANtSkIllpteture Required O Adult Signature Required $ ��^,.�. •. ❑Adult Signature Restricted Deltvery$ \ ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ `.�f ,•,,.,m,•r,.!'f; p Postage \ . t 0 Postage n� „•t r rr-t s _= r= - ra T rl Shaw Joshua-Melissa Shaw Nagia,Naresh-Geeta Nagia cc 26 Red Roof Dr 12 Birch Ln o PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 ----- a PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 — tt PS Form PS :rr r ,. :rr Postal7 See Reverse for Instructions Service" Postal ■ , MAILP RECEIPT CERTIFIED MAIL"' RECEIPT 0' Dornestic Mail Only fU Domestic Mail Only -D ru For delivery information,visit our website at www.usps.con? Ea , 3 -Jfr s CQ _ C"god Mail Fee n Certified Mail Fee .D 5 -n $ cO Extra Services&Few rchack bar.add fee as appmpd&W cO Extra Services&Fees(check box,add fee a:ap vodnarp) [I Return EZI [:]Return Receipt [3 Return eipt(electminle) ❑CerlMed M Rrob1 IDeINery 3--T a ' Here O ❑❑AC.r1ftc Maai R dult SignatureRtictedd Dil f Here uired O ❑ g eq ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery - ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ O poy� a Postage Lr) U1 !v Figueroa,Liadel-Keith Conover 1, Lovallo,Pat 0 181 N Ridge St o Ir 177 N Ridge St o PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 o PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 t •• Postal CERTIFIED MAIL"' RECEIPT CERTIFIED MAIL' RECEIPT m Domestic Mail Only .to Domestic Ir CID ru For delivery information.visit our website at p IvFor delivery information,visit our welosite at wwwosps.com FEIC ° � C► FFICIAL USE Certified Mail Fee Certified Mall Fee $ .� $ m Extra Services&Fees rd wk box,add lee as uppropdats) 43 Extra Services&Fees(check WX add AN w appmiprWel - — ❑Retum Receipt(h-dcopy) $ ❑Return Receipt Va dcopy) $ - O ❑Retum Recalpt(alecuonlc) $ POSorNh C3 ❑Retum Receipt(electronic) $ Postmark ❑Certified Mal Restricted Delivery, $ 7ob C3 ❑Certified Mall Restricted Delivery $ HarO, %,l" t ❑Adult Sigrature Required $ 7• '' ❑Adult Signature Required $ it lt; lj (' v; ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$_ _ f C3 ]Adult Signature Restricted DelNay$ Postage �----- f i 0 Postage U-) 5 u) $ - T To1 ru $ Gottlieb,Peter-Roberta Gottlieb RJ $ Fay,Guy-Marilyn Fay C:j 15 Red Roof Dr ti se 185 N Ridge St ru o PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 —"" ru §n PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 -------- ItiIf N -- t tr ,Ap�.1 See Reverse for instroction • • Postal CERTIFIED MAIURECEIPT CERTIFIED MAILa RECEIPT Domestic Mail On/y Ir Domestic Mail Only n m m 'FFICI o 0 information. CertifiedCIOCo Mail Fee Certified Mal Fee -� $ 0 $ I - . "(;,.1�/ 1:0 Extra Services&Fees(check dos,edd fee as appnopdere) Extra Services&Fees(check box add fee as eppropdete) El Return El(Iwdwpy) $ Ratum Receipt(hardcopy5 $ ED ❑Retum Receipt(electronic) $ PDstmetk ❑Karam Receipt(eiecbonk:) S OO 1 ❑Certified Mal Reetn'cled Delivery $ Here _ 0 ❑Cerufied Mal Restricted Delivery S z7 ' ❑Adult Signature Requhed $ M ❑Adult Signature Required $ J Him ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery S O ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery 3 \ Postage C3 Postage tJl S ru $ Lipschultz Brent S-llyssa S Lipschultz ) Werlinich,Gregory CZ] sE 24 Red Roof Dr o 14 Birch Ln o PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 0 �r PORT CHESTER,NY 10573 r` r .• Postal CERTIFIED MAILG' RECEIPT CERTIFIED • m Domestic Mail Only I ti m m C3 C3 Via.► L Q -a J- i co _ -o Certified Mail Fee i Certified Mall Fee ,n $ S cE) Extra Services&Fees (checknr,b , Servicesas dd He N eppWdate) cO Extra Services&Fees¢Wreck bcK add Ha appmprrals) ❑Return Receipt(hammpy) $ _ ❑Retum Receipt Qwdcopyl $ 0 ❑Retum Receipt(.wect-1.) $ tP Irt1t!'tt l I: ❑Retum Receipt(dear—) $ Postmark 0 ❑Cert"w Mail Restricted NNery $ �!.„ Iggre O ❑��Mail Restricted DelNary S C3 ❑Adult Signature Required III O ❑Adult Slgratun Required $ ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ ❑Adult Slgn-cure Restricted Delivery S 1 Postage Ln t�rl postage SdSZ/ FU Epstein,Kara ru Shiffman,David-Deborah Shiffman ID 10 Birch Ln o 11 Red Roof Dr ru PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 -------------•-- p PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 r` -- - t ----_"------•-- k PostalPostal Service"" DomesticCERTIFIED MAIL' RECEIPT CERTIFIED MAIL"' RECEIPT Only r%- Domestic Mail Only m For d,liwvry m 0F•rmation,visit our website at tvwtv.usps.com For dclivery FICI . _information.. Q -SE p Certified Mall Fee p Certffied Mal Fee r 1 c13 Extra Services&Fees(dwak UK add he a1 appmptW Extra Services&Fees(check bar,add tee as approprfatai ElRetum Receipt(hardcopy) i a ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) $ O ' n�lintt� j 0 C3 Red—Ret Receipt(elec6m1c) f Postmark O Elt Ra im Receipt(electronic) S O ❑Certified Mall Reminded Delivery f Here C3 ❑Certriied Mall Restricted Delivery S Here 1( C3 ❑Adult Signature Rmulrad f M ❑Adult Signature Required $ ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery f �.�r. t.u►t' ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery S ....s"�'. p Poadtge p Postage L r to $ nJ Sakofsky Evan-Sari Sakofsky nJ S Williams James-Latoya Moore p 11 Berkley Ln o iser 9 Berkley Ln ru PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 ru l PORT CHESTER. NY 10573 --•••.- - p f� r` PF,Form :r. ans rr April 2015OGO-S)N7 See Reverse for Instruction;, Postal - U.S. Postal CERTIFIED MAIL@ RECEIPT CERTIFIED MAILO RECEIPT cO Domestic Only Domestic Mail Only fti mtVii�L m For deliv(,ry information,visit our i�VebSite at wtvi-�.ijsps.com C3 EZI .A Certified Mail Fee _p Certified Mal Fee _0 $ .0 $ C0 Extra.Services&Fees(chadr bnf,add fee as appmpdaw) � Extra Services&Fees(check box,add tee a5 Aop-prwq) ❑Return Receipt(hardcopy) f 1 Q ❑Retum Receipt(hardcopy) $ ❑ 7aP 9Rt1aRt�1'II Return Receipt(electrunic) f trlt Q C3 ❑Return Receipt(elecbonic) $ p O El Certified Mall Restdctad NINery $ pre El [ICadged Mail Restricted Delivery $ Here C3 ❑Adult Slgr,atura Required $ ❑Aduk Signature Required $ ❑Adult signature Raabicted Delivery$ ♦ ❑Adult signature Restricted Delivery$ C3 Posuge - r a Postage Ln � T ru� T ru = Zaccagnino,Joseph-Estate ofMary a Wu Yinghao-Mingzhi Chen Q 5 Zaccagnino Trust C3 15 Berkley Ln o $ 175 N Ridge St o �, PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 ......� PS Form :rr April 2015r PostalService" Postal CERTIFIED MAILO RECEIPT I CERTIFIED MAILO' RECEIPT Domestic Mail • �► Domestic o 43 For m C3 cc o For delivery information,visit our website at www.usps.com CcFFIC � �_ G ru .A Cemed Mail -n Certified Mail Fee .J3 $ -n $ � Extra Sernces&Fees(check box.add hate!apprqudaro) Extra Services&Fees(check Dec add teen appropnaa) ❑Return Receipt(nardcopy) S ❑Rehm Recelpt(hardcopy) $ )/17 C3 ❑Return Recapt(decbonlc) S Poslmark 0 ❑Return Recelpt(elect-1c) f 0 ❑Cedifed Mail Restricted Delivery f 0 �1 ❑CertMed Mall Rr>strictad Delivery f Here 0 ❑Adult Signature Raqukad S_ iiJ�. J ` " 0 I❑Adutt signature Required []Adult Signature Rstrictad Delivery$ ❑Adult S gneture Restricted Delivery f p PostageC3Postage �- u7 S ul S .7 Tc T Tc ru S $Wilk Robert-Haley Wilk ni Lungariello Michael Jr-Veronica L p sr 16 Birch Ln O S, Lungariello C3 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 ru C3 _- 18 Red Roof Dr o s) o sl -_— r\- r� PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 ----------- c, ---------- I :ri • / Postal CERTIFIED MAIL) RECEIPT CERTIFIED MAIL-,' RECEIPT RI ootnestic Alail Only L1l Domestic Mail Only E r-1 rn s Cc OFFICIAL USE 7�c-.-iir,adMe!IFee - -_ rO certifi -0 S �p S cc Services d Feea(check ow,add t«as npprcprldU Cc Extra Services&Fees(check b-,,add lee es�proprfWd ❑Return Receipt OardocpY) $ ❑Rehrm Reoelpt(hardoopy) $ C:3 ❑Ratum Recdpt(electrmk'i 3 PoSIMark O ❑Return Receipt(elactronla) $ POSVfdwk ❑06,0fied MNI Reetdcted DellvsY C3 1 ❑cert!ied Mai'Rmtrlcted NINNy $ Adult Signature Required 3 O i ❑Adult Signature Required S ❑Adult Slgnaeue ResWcted DNWerY 3 O ; ❑Adult Signature R@Wcted Delivery S Postage Postage a I o MAR 2 6 %u Ln s Rl Tc Zottola,Arthur T-Laura Zottola ru Vickers Adam-Jodi Vickers p $ 301 Betsy Brown Rd 0 28 Red Roof Dr ru PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 _____ ---------- o $ PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 �" - i o _. r` r` � I PS Form 3800,April 2015 PSN 7�V4W4047 See Reverse lor Instruclim r - R RD 007 w 17 If maol4K R. 1i1 LL i a op CD I � z c� J W Z ti N N C4 Iy W �- et Q ,a M M N Ln eh M Ill Ill U1 I� N Ill 1n 1l1 In N N N Ili L11 ll1 � Il) °i •- C 49 Il1 Ill IL) I(1 N Ill In 49 IA aA 111 K1 Il1 Ill In If/ M M M IV 1 M fh m m M f7 M I+1 M m in M V li r .Sr, 1 � f - _ V• W LL t] W � a t W a ZZ Oo r U ° W a�o �w~ a w zyrrn: aW 2 m� j O omoozxi�� g� U• O� moo � "J W aam Z 0 r Z N g W Q w mZ O Z _ F _U �3p �cmpm "Qoa a Z m a 0= O x Q zi> m °ooa am (I � m O > z m o a a IIII f� i ti 91 ir r r t i $ 3 ,•ri S ' r ' ,� h,j jt r• �T F- r I �i 'l{fi,jrill� � r C .•l 'at r 'f •t ;;;v t; �y �r s ,0, a4k ;i 1 .. 1 1 f -- .cif;" , [t�C� � ,•. ��� �%�j�7►� s-(� y i moo- '�► J `••- �'t QyE DR �- Ctt " J GG VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK MAYOR 938 King Street,Rye Brook,N.Y. 10573 ADMINISTRATOR Paul S.Rosenberg (914)939-0668 Christopher J.Bradbury www.ryebrook.org TRUSTEES BUILDING&FIRE Susan R.Epstein INSPECTOR Stephanie J.Fischer Michael J.Izzo David M.Heiser Jason A.Klein November 22,2021 Applicant: Robert Wilk&Haley Wilk 16 Birch Lane Rye Brook,New York 10573 Re:Zoning Board of Appeals Escrow Account—16 Birch Lane Dear Robert Wilk&Haley Wilk: Building Department records indicate that the professional fees incurred over the course of the Zoning Board's review of your extension application total$50.00.As such your project escrow account has a negative balance of$50.00, which must be brought up to date. Please deposit with the Village, the sum of$50.00 as soon as possible.The spread sheet outlining invoices is attached for your review. Thank you for your attention to this matter. The applicable section of Village Code requiring payment of professional fees by the applicant is included on the next page for your review and convenience. Thank you for your anticipated cooperation. Sincerely, 4\ 4ALAJ�' Tara A. Gerardi Secretary,Planning Board, Zoning Board of Appeals& Architectural Review Board Cc:Michael Izzo,Building&Fire Inspector 1 §47-2.Escrow accounts. [Adopted by the Board of Trustees of the Village of Rye Brook 8-9-1994 by L.L. No. 9-1994;amended in its entirety 10-27-2020 by L.L.No. 9-2020.Subsequent amendments noted where applicable.] A. An escrow account to pay such consultant's fees may be required where the Village deems it necessary to retain a consultant regarding the application for the following applications: (1)Applications requesting an interpretation of any provision of the Village Code; (2)Site plan applications in accordance with Chapter 209; (3)Special use permit applications in accordance with§250-6H; (4)Variance applications in accordance with§250-13; (5)Subdivision applications in accordance with Chapter 219; (6)Architectural review in accordance with Chapter 8; (7)Erosion and sediment control permit in accordance with Chapter 118; (8)Floodplain development permit in accordance with Chapter 130; (9)Steep slopes work permit in accordance with Chapter 213; (10)Permits to perform any regulated activity in a wetland in accordance with Chapter 245; (11)Tree removal appeal in accordance with Chapter 235;and (12)Any other application where the Village deems it necessary to retain a consultant regarding the application. B.The applicant shall submit a separate check in an amount to be determined by the Village Administrator or Superintendent of Public Works/Village Engineer,but not less than$250 nor more than$2,500,to be used to establish an escrow account,from which withdrawals shall be made to reimburse the Village for the costs of professional review services. C.The applicant shall be provided with copies of any Village invoice for such services as they are submitted to the Village.All costs charged to the applicant shall be those reasonable and necessary to the decision making function of the reviewing board as set/defined in§47-1B. D.The applicant shall be required, from time to time,to deliver additional funds to the Village for deposit in the escrow account if such additional funds are required to pay for professional consultation services rendered to the Village or anticipated to be rendered.This amount shall be determined by the reviewing board or the Superintendent of Public Works/Village Engineer based on an evaluation of the nature and complexity of the application. E.If such account is not replenished within 30 days after the applicant is notified,in writing,of the requirement for such additional deposit,the reviewing Board may suspend its review of the application. An application shall be deemed incomplete if any amount shall be outstanding. F.In the event that any application before any Board or department is withdrawn prior to any actions being taken,the applicant is nevertheless responsible for any expenses incurred by the Village with regard to said application prior to such withdrawal. 2 G.A deposit in escrow may be required at any stage in the application process,including but not limited to preapplication discussions with the applicant. H.'The applicant shall be provided with copies of any invoice for consultant fees as they are submitted to the Village and with Village staff time records for services for which reimbursement is sought. I.Escrow funds shall be refunded to the applicant when the applicant formally withdraws the application from consideration by the permitting authority or when the applicant receives a final determination from the permitting authority;in either case,all reimbursable charges incurred by the Village shall be first deducted from the escrow account,leaving an unencumbered balance that is not required by the permitting authority to pay consulting costs attributable to the application. Fees collected in accordance with the Village Code shall not be refunded.After all pertinent costs have been paid,the Village shall refund to the applicant any funds remaining in the escrow account within 30 days from the date of the final determination issued by permitting authority or from the date the applicant notifies the Village,in writing, of the withdrawal of the application.If the applicant is indebted to the Village for any fees,the amount of money still owed shall be added to the real property Village tax of the property and shall become alien against the property if not paid within 30 days of written demand. J.A building permit nor certificate of occupancy or use shall not be issued unless all professional review fees charged in connection with the applicant's project have been paid by the applicant.In no case shall a building permit or certificate of occupancy be issued to the applicant if the applicant is indebted to the Village for any professional review fees in excess of the escrow. IC The imposition of escrow account fees are in addition to,and not in place of,other fee schedules currently in force. 3 PRO ADDRESS 16 BIRCH LANE PRO CT NAME wux CCOUNT# CCOUNT START DATE: CCOUAT CASE DATE: Aed rkie dw bm INVOICE DATE INVOICE# CHECK DATE CRUX# DISTRIBUTED TO DEBrr DEPOSIT Balance Unpaid Invoice, 3/15/2021 1386 VRB j 1,000.00 4/15/2021 68100 5/21/2021 1334 K&B j 25.00 5/17/2021 68951 6/14/2021 1338 K&B f 250.00 5/31/2021 05312021 7/7/2021 1346 *Wilk j 725.00 *Refund to 16 Birch Lme 11/15/2021 74292 K&B f 50.00 f 1,050.00 j 1,000.00 450.00 $50.00 Mike Izzo From: Evan Haskell <evan.m.haskell@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, April 6, 2021 1:45 PM To: Mike Izzo Subject: Zoning Board Meeting - 4/6/2021 Dear Michael, I am writing regarding the Zoning Variance request for 16 Birch Lane (#21-001) on the agenda for this evening Zoning Board meeting. I am the owner of 22 Red Roof Drive, one of the homes directly across the cul-de-sac from the backyard (rear front yard) where the pool is proposed. I have no issue with the owners of 16 Birch installing a pool on their property, however, in reviewing the plans I noted that all construction is being loaded and unloaded through the rear yard (Red Roof Front Yard) which results in most construction inconveniences being placed on the residents of Red Roof Drive and not on the owner. This is especially concerning for us given we have two small children (2 years old and 4 years old). As such, I have questions and concerns around all the safety precautions being taken both during construction and when completed, since the backyard is truly a front yard to the cul-de-sac on Red Roof Drive where children play. The plans indicated that the construction tracking pad is intended to be across the street from my property and in the aforementioned cul-de-sac. Given this I think it is important that consideration be given to the frequency with which this entrance will be used (how often will heavy machinery be pulled in and out) and where the machinery and other materials are being stored when construction is done for the day. I am concerned that excavators and other heavy machinery will be parked in the cul-de-sac and pulling in and out of 16 Birch's backyard which could create safety concerns for children in the cul-de-sac. I also would like to understand how the backyard will be secured during construction. Right now there is no fencing around the back. In fact the residents of 16 Birch at times will walk out the back of their property onto Red Roof or have visitors arrive through this back yard which shows just how easy it is to enter and exit the yard from Red Roof Drive. This ease of access is also part of the concern given there will be a large hole and other hazardous conditions during the construction. I believe construction work in someone's backyard is typically loaded and unloaded through the owner's front yard (given backyards are typically not accessible from the street), however, in this instance because the backyard is also a front yard the proposal is for everything to be loaded through the back. This in essence means that the request is for the backyard to be deemed a backyard for the purposes of having the pool, but deemed a front yard for the purposes of actually doing the physical construction of the pool. I appreciate you addressing this question and my concerns during the meeting. Assuming the owners are adequate and appropriately addressing all these concerns I have no issue with the general application for a pool. Regards, Evan Haskell Owner of 22 Red Roof Drive (631) 796-5614 1 y� URnv Village of Rye Brook Agend 0 %0 'L, Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting Tuesday,April 6, 2021 at 8:00 PM Village Hall, 938 King Street ANNOUNCEMENT:The April 6,2021 Zoning Board of Appeals meeting will be held via videoconferencing and in-person,if permitted by the Governor's Executive Orders.The public will have an opportunity to see and hear the meeting live and provide comments. Further information on in-person attendance,if permitted,will be available on the Village website. The public can watch the live meeting on Cable TV,online from the Public Meetings link on the Village website (www.ryebrook.org),and through the Zoom App.If any interested members of the public would like to provide comments on an application,comments can be called in during the meeting at+1 (929)205-6099,Meeting ID: 8516097 6834 or provided through the written chat section of the Zoom meeting. Comments can also be emailed before and during the public hearing to Michael Izzo,Village Building Inspector,at mizzo&yebrook.org. Please check the Village website for updates. INSTRUCTIONS TO ACCESS THE VIRTUAL MEETING: If you have a computer,tablet or smartphone,you can register,log in and see the video and hear the audio of the live session. You can access the Zoom meeting at his://us02web.zoom.us/j/85160976834 and clicking on "Join a Meeting"and enter Meeting ID: 8516097 6834(no password required).You can also call in to the ZOOM meeting at+1 (929) 205-6099,when prompted,enter 8516097 6834#. On the evening of April 6,2021,5 minutes before 8:00 p.m.,log in with your computer, smartphone or telephone.You will be placed on hold until the meeting starts. Questions about accessing the Zoom videoconference should be emailed to amarshallnaeryebrook.org. 1. ITEMS: 1.1. #21-007 Michael Moore&Kelly Moore 24 Beechwood Boulevard Construct 2nd floor addition,rear two story addition,rear masonry terrace,rear masonry walk and replace existing masonry walkway. Mail Affidavit Sign Affidavit Approvals; Adjournment Aye; Dvt MI Nay; S l3 SF G 13 K&B JDS JS t DH 1.2. #21-008 Yuval Meron&Jana Meron 46 Winding Wood Road Construct a 2nd floor addition,wood deck,rear masonry patio expansion and interior alterations. Mail Affidavit Sign Affidavit Approvals; Adjournment Aye; Nay; 1.3. #21-005 Matthew Altman&Alexandra Altman 42 Lawridge Drive Legalize re-constructed rear deck. Mail Affidavit Sign Affidavit Approvals; Adjournment Aye; Nay; 1.4. #21-009 Joseph Sandarciero III&Stephanie Sandarciero 112 Country Ridge Drive Construct new rear patio with fire pit and sitting walls. Mail Affidavit Sign Affidavit Approvals; Adjournment Aye; Nay; DM Ml SB SF GB K&B JDS JS DH 1.5. #21-006 Matthew Wiener&Erica Wiener 18 Boxwood Place Construct front and rear 2nd story additions. Mail Affidavit Sign Affidavit Approvals; Adjournment Aye; Nay; 1.6. #21-004 Joseph Sullivan&Tracey Sullivan 82 Tamarack Road Legalize the one-story detached garage constructed under Building Permit#698 dated 3/22/1954. Mail Affidavit Sign Affidavit Approvals; Adjournment Aye; Nay; 1.7. #21-021 Joseph Sullivan&Tracey Sullivan 82 Tamarack Road Legalize rear deck and screen porch. Mail Affidavit Sign Affidavit Approvals; Adjournment Aye; DM Ml Nay; SB SF GB K&B JDS JS nll 1.8. #21-001 Robert Wilk&Haley Wilk 16 Birch Lane Construct an in-ground swimming pool with pool patio,pool equipment,pool fence and wood deck. Mail Affidavit Sign Affidavit Approvals; Adjoumment Aye; Nay; 2. SUMMARY APPROVALS: 2.1. Approval of March 2,2021 Zoning Board Summary Approvals; Adjoumment Aye; Nay; DM MI J SB SF GB K&B JDS V JS DH -t APPROVED Village of Rye Brook ends DATE LOV l Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting Tuesday,April 6, 2021 at 8:00 PM Village Hall,938 King Street D [E UM V IE DD April 6, 2021 Minutes MAY - 5 2021 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK BUILDING DEPARTMENT ANNOUNCEMENT: The April 6, 2021 Zoning Board of Appeals meeting will be held via videoconferencing and in-person, if permitted by the Governor's Executive Orders. The public will have an opportunity to see and hear the meeting live and provide comments. Further information on in-person attendance, if permitted, will be available on the Village website. The public can watch the live meeting on Cable TV, online from the Public Meetings link on the Village website (www.ryebrook.org), and through the Zoom App. If any interested members of the public would like to provide comments on an application, comments can be called in during the meeting at +1 (929) 205-6099, Meeting ID: 8516097 6834 or provided through the written chat section of the Zoom meeting. Comments can also be emailed before and during the public hearing to Michael Izzo,Village Building Inspector, at mizzo(c�r7,ryebrook.org. Please check the Village website for updates. INSTRUCTIONS TO ACCESS THE VIRTUAL MEETING: If you have a computer, tablet or smartphone, you can register, log in and see the video and hear the audio of the live session. You can access the Zoom meeting at https://us02web.zoom.us/-/85160976834 and clicking on "Join a Meeting" and enter Meeting ID: 8516097 6834 (no password requited). You can also call in to the ZOOM meeting at +1 (929) 205-6099,when prompted, enter 8516097 6834#. On the evening of April 6, 2021, 5 minutes before 8:00 p.m., log in with your computer, smartphone or telephone. You will be placed on hold until the meeting starts. Questions about accessing the Zoom videoconference should be emailed to amarshallgryebrook.org. - 1 - https:/lotter.ai Michael Izzo We lost him. We're losing you Don. Don Moscato Number of people on. I have requested, please mute your audio. You can hear me. It says my internet connection is unstable. Nothing like having an unstable internet connection.We have technically seven or eight applications. And in the event that we're not able to finish we will adjourn it for our next session. And we have no idea how fast we'll move through the applications. But we do have to give each one due diligence. If you're making a presentation, please acknowledge who you are. Let the main presenter give the application and if there are the actual applicants available, they can chime in after the main presentation is made. 1.1. #21-007 Michael Moore & Kelly Moore 24 Beechwood Boulevard Construct 2nd floor addition, rear two story addition, rear masonry terrace, rear masonry walk and replace existing masonry walkway. Don Moscato Our first application this evening is application number 21-007 Michael Moore and Kelly Moore 24 Beachwood Boulevard to construct a second floor addition, rear two story addition, rear masonry terrace, rear masonry walk and replace existing masonry walkway. I believe the architect for this is Justin Minieri.Justin, are you on board? Justin Minieri Yes, I am. Good evening everyone. Don Moscato Okay, please start your presentation. Justin Minieri Mickey, my condolences. Michael Izzo Thank you,Justin. Justin Minieri I just learned about your mom, really sorry. - 2- Transcribed by https://otter.ai Michael Izzo Thank you,Justin. I appreciate that. Justin Minieri Okay, my name is Justin Minieri. I'm the architect for Michael and Kelly Moore at 24 Beechwood, and I guess I'd like to start with sharing my screen if you'll allow me. So,we can get right in. I know you have a long agenda, so I'll try to keep it brief. Okay, start with photos, just to give you a brief view of the existing house. And I'll get into this quick description. Can everyone see the house?Yes. Yeah, this is the front of the house, this is the garage where we're adding the second story, for some reason cannot. All right, I'll have to go. And this is the rear of the house. So, the two story addition is where my arrow is, and the second floor additions over the garage, this side is going to remain as is. So,we're just concentrating on this side of the house. I have more photos. I can always go back if there's any questions. I'll start with the drawings, just we since we have limited time. Okay. So, we're,we're adding a second floor addition on this side, over the garage, same footprint, and then we're adding a two story section in the rear,which squares off the back of the house, that's it, and then we're adding a terrace. So that's essentially what we're proposing. I'll just briefly so here's the existing garage,we're adding a two story section, this little rectangle and adding a second floor here. And so, as you can see the additions right here,it lines up with the back of the house,we're not really going out the confines of this footprint. And that's the second floor adding a master bedroom, master bath and doing some interior alteration.As you can see the existing house, and this is the second floor addition we're putting on and second floor from the side view in the rear view. So,what we're asking here is three variances. The first variance is very small, it's probably the smallest variance that ever came before you, an actual variance of three inches. And you say why cant we avoid it?Well, let me just go back. The problem is when they built this house, they didn't build it parallel with the property line, just slightly off. So, the front, you know, complies with the setback,it's actually 15.11 feet. And if they built a parallel,we wouldn't need to request this various, the house is slightly angled, so by the time it gets in the back,we're at 14.75. So, the house kind of wanders off to the right, and the problem, then it creates that three inches. For us to offset the addition three, six inches, creates really awkward rooflines, and just creates structural issues. So,you know, I hate coming before you for three inches, but you know, I'm just unavoidable. The variance is 1.67% under 2%. So, it's a very small variance. The second variance is for the total. And it seems a lot because it's 8.84 feet. And that's only because the left side is non-conforming. It extends over the 25 foot because the code requires 40 feet total. And we're presenting you with 31.16 feet and we're going from 31, so we're increasing our non-conforming by that three inches, but in total,it's 8.8. So,it's a 22%. But that's unavoidable because the left side which we're not touching is non- conforming. And then the third variance is as we see this side the height setback ratio. So,let me see if I can zoom it in. That's it right here, I did my best by keeping the roofline,you know, angled - 3- Transcribed by https://otter.ai towards the property line, because I knew I had a little trouble here because of the grade dropped. And, but I'm adding a second floor addition, that's in line with the rest of the house, so I can't really lower it. And we comply with building height, but it's just, I'm getting clipped by this corner. So there again,we're off,we're the code requires 1.3. And we're proposing 1.5. So,it's a .20,which translates to 15.38%. Again, you know,it's just this little triangle, as you can see that I'm over. And without bastardizing the house, I really can't avoid that again,unfortunately. So though, it's three variances, I think it really doesn't affect the neighborhood, they're very small. As far as you know, I see it, you may see it differently. I hope we can come to an agreement that these variances aren't that big,but as you can see the neighboring properties to left and right, and I'm done any questions? I just want to point out Mike, the homeowner has approached the neighbors, and the neighbors have expressed, even though I don't have any letters submitted, they have expressed their support for these properties. The homeowner is in the audience if you wish to ask them about that. But they can speak a little more in detail about those support, neighbors of support.And I'm done if there's any questions from the Board? Glenn Brettschneider Justin,I have one just because no one spoke up. So just okay. If the only variance was the three inches, and I know it's not relevant to this, but would someone come to the board and just ask for a variance for that? Or is it just because it's part of three anyway, and you're already here? I'm just curious about that three inches? Justin Minieri Well, no, the three inches, I mean, I would have come here anyway. Cause, see this is the line for me to avoid the three inches. The garage is already set. So,I'm not. If I was adding a two story addition, I wouldn't even, I would of course, I would avoid it, I would move it in. But the garage wall forces the second floor to fall on top of that. I'm not going to offset the second floor six inches to avoid that variance. But it will just create structural nightmare. And look,it just wouldn't look good. I know this is not an aesthetics Board. But I mean,I have to weigh that in. So really the only two story addition I'm adding is here, but this, I am you know,keeping with the garage envelope and footprint so I'm not, you know, coming closer to the property in that respect. Glenn Brettschneider I got it,was just about the three inches. Justin Minieri If I could have avoided the three inches,I'd never be here. - 4- Transcribed by https://otter.ai Glenn Brettschneider Yeah, gotcha. Don Moscato Justin,I have a question for you. I lost my computer audio,but I'm on the phone. Justin Minieri Sure Don. Don Moscato Okay. You know, the question I'm always asking is, make a case for why you could not get a smaller variance from the one you're proposing? Justin Minieri Well, I would hope three inches is pretty small. Less than three would be zero, right? So, you're right,we always try go for small but at three inches there is nowhere to go right. Sort of,like I said, because as you can see, let me go to the, so I'm really this is the line, I'm lining up the second floor for me to avoid the three inches, I would have to push us in three inches. It's just,it just wouldn't be responsible of me as an architect. It is such a whacked out situation here. I would have to tear the garage down in order to comply. And I think you know, that would be a good reason for not, you know, for not to,you know, try to reduce it because that would be just such an awkward situation.You know. Don Moscato Right,you're lucky that you happen to have a neighbor to the garage side,who is not the same one who lived there previously. Justin Minieri Okay. Don Moscato Because you would have had an issue with the height setback ratio, I'm sure. Justin Minieri Okay. - 5- Transcribed by https://otter.ai Don Moscato But I did speak to the neighbor to that side and asked them if they were comfortable with the variance. And they indicated to me personally that they had no problem with any of the variances requested. So,you know, I think in terms of one of the variances is coming in at what is it, 22%? And that's the, the side, I guess that would be the two side yard setbacks. Justin Minieri Correct. Don Moscato Right. So, there is, you are very, very close to that neighbor on that side. And there is adequate shrubbery at this particular point Are you planning on augmenting any of the shrubbery on that side?To mitigate the effects of that setback. Justin Minieri I believe the owner, the homeowners, I would like the homeowners to come in on this and speak to that if you don't mind. Mike, are you? Do you hear me? Michael Moore Yep, I'm on. Hi, everyone. no, our plans are not to enhance the shrubbery. I mean, on that side, the trees that we have there go up 20-25 feet. I mean, there's plenty of coverage between the two of us. And between us and the Steinberg's. It's like it gives us enough privacy. Don Moscato Okay, but I was concerned about their side, of their side view. But I remember several years ago, the previous owners of that particular property did shave off a substantial amount of those pine trees that we're on that side. Michael Moore Yeah,Justin, just that's a good view, that if you look on the left side,you know that and those trees at the bottom,were just in pointing out right now. Those are evergreens. There's, they're there full all year round. So, you know, the very,very top thins out a little bit in the winter, but there's lots of coverage between our two houses. Don Moscato Okay. Okay. All right. Thank you. Thank you very much. Do any of the other board members want to comment on the application at this time? - 6- Transcribed by https://otter.ai Jamie Schutzer My only questions- So just to be clear behind the garage, you're just building a terrace there now? You're just kind of extending the terrace that's, that's covered there now? Justin Minieri That's correct. Without the cover,no roof,we just extending the patio portion to line up with back of the garage. Steve Berger So, I guess the follow up to Jamie's question, does the variance prevent you from building over that terrace? I know. Sorry,J amie, I took your thunder away. Jamie Schutzer That's Okay. Justin Minieri If we were to build over that. Let's see. When you say build over it you mean with an addition. Steve Berger Yes,we don't want the variance to allow you in the future or the next owner to convert that terrace to building. Justin Minieri Well, if they were, they would have to come back to you because they would violate the FAR that will most likely put them over the FAR. You know, and, I mean they would need a variance to build there so wouldn't... Steve Berger But... Don Moscato Steve, would you like to see that condition in there anyway? Steve Berger That's where I think I was going and I think Jamie was going there. Jamie Schutzer And I agree with that as well. - 7- Transcribed by https://otter.ai Don Moscato Okay. Okay.Justin, do you want to ask the applicant if they're comfortable with that condition? Justin Minieri Mike, are you comfortable with that? Michael Moore I'm not, I'm not entirely sure what the condition would be. You're saying what would be the thing that... Steve Berger That you can't use the variance to take the terrace and convert it to a sunroom or another bedroom? In other words,it has to stay as a terrace not as a building. Michael Moore Yeah, I'm comfortable with that. We have no plans of doing that. Don Moscato Thank you. Okay. Glenn. Glenn, do you want to comment or Joel? Glenn Brettschneider Nope. I asked my three inch question. I'm good. Don Moscato Okay,Joel, are you there? Joel Simon I'm here. I'm good. I have no questions. I have nothing. Don Moscato Okay. Is there, Is there anyone in the audience?Listening? Or standing outside who would like to speak in favor of this application? There being none heard, is there anyone who wants to speak against the application? Okay, let the record show that. I commented on a person viewing it favorably and so did Justin in his presentation indicated that they spoke to the neighbors and they didn't have a problem with it. Can I have a motion to close the public hearing? - 8- Transcribed by https://otter.ai Glenn Brettschneider Motion to close. Steve Berger Second. Don Moscato Seconded. okay. All in favor? Jamie Schutzer Aire. Joel Simon Aye. Glenn Brettschneider Aye. Steve Berger Aye. Don Moscato Aye. Okay, public hearing is closed. Let me run through the factors. Having once again just attended another training session, and they remind me to make sure that the record shows that we went through the factors with the supporting evidence. Do we all agree that this change will not affect the character or the environmental conditions affecting the neighborhood?Are we comfortable with that? Yeah. Okay, do we all agree that the variances collectively are substantial? Glenn Brettschneider Collectively. Steve Berger Collectively?Yeah. Don Moscato Yes, I think we have looked at it collectively. And how about the self-creation?Are we comfortable that this is self-created? Yes. Okay. And the other one,Justin spoke to specifically indicating that from an aesthetic point of view, there's,it is not possible to come in with a smaller variance, since - 9- Transcribed by https://otter.ai he's boxing out the, basically boxing out the footprint of the house. So,we'll agree that you will not be able to achieve the objectives other than the one, the method that is proposed. Okay, are we comfortable with all those?Yes, I'll go ahead and as expeditiously as possible, read the resolution. RESOLUTION WHEREAS, application has been made to the Zoning Board by Michael Moore & Kelly Moore (the "Applicants") for (1) a single side yard setback variance of 0.25 feet (3 inches) where the minimum required single yard setback is 15 feet pursuant to Village Code § 250-18.2.H(2)(a), (2) a total of two side yards setback variance of 8.84 feet where the minimum required total of two side yards setback is 40 feet pursuant to Village Code § 250-18.2.H(2)(b); and (3) a side height setback ratio variance of 0.20 where the maximum allowable side height setback ratio is 1.30 pursuant to Village Code § 250-18.2 J(2), in connection with the proposed second floor addition, rear two story addition, rear masonry terrace, rear masonry walk and replace existing masonry walkway, on property located at 24 Beechwood Boulevard,in an R-25 zoning district on the south side of Beechwood Boulevard, approximately 50 feet from the intersection of Beechwood Circle and Beechwood Boulevard. Said premises being known and designated on the tax map of the Village of Rye Brook as Parcel ID# 136.29-1-11; and WHEREAS, the Property has (1) an existing non-conforming single side yard setback of 14.96 feet and the proposed addition will result in a single side yard setback of 14.75 feet and (2) an existing non-conforming total of two side yards setback of 31.37 feet and the proposed addition will result in a total of two side yards setback of 31.16 feet; and WHEREAS, a duly advertised public hearing was held April 6, 2021, at which time all those wishing to be heard were given such opportunity; and WHEREAS, the public hearing was closed on April 6, 2021; and WHEREAS, the proposed action is a Type II action pursuant to the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act and accordingly, no further environmental review is required; and - 10- Transcribed by https://otter.ai WHEREAS, the Board, from the application, after viewing the premises and neighborhood concerned, and upon considering each of the factors set forth in Village Code § 250-13(G)(b)[2][a]- [e] of the Rye Brook Code, finds: 1) The variances WILL NOT create an adverse impact to the character of the neighborhood; 2) The benefit the Applicants seek CANNOT be achieved through another method, feasible for the Applicants to pursue, that does not require the variances; 3) The variances ARE substantial; 4) The variances WILL NOT create any adverse impacts to the physical or environmental conditions of the neighborhood; and 5) The need for the variances IS self-created. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the said application for (1) a single side yard setback variance of 0.25 feet (3 inches) where the minimum required single yard setback is 15 feet pursuant to Village Code § 250-18.2.H(2)(a), (2) a total of two side yards setback variance of 8.84 feet where the minimum required total of two side yards setback is 40 feet pursuant to Village Code 250-18.2.H(2)(b); and (3) a side height setback ratio variance of 0.20 where the maximum allowable side height setback ratio is 1.30 pursuant to Village Code § 250-18.2 J(2), in connection with the proposed second floor addition,rear two story addition,rear masonry terrace,rear masonry walk and replace existing masonry walkway, on property located at 24 Beechwood Boulevard, is hereby GRANTED on the following conditions: 1) No permit or certificate of occupancy shall be issued until the Applicants have paid in full all application and consultant fees incurred by the Village in connection with the review of this application. - 11 - Transcribed by https://otter.ai Don Moscato Secondly, Drew, do you want to read out your condition please? Drew Gamils 2) The Applicant shall be prohibited from enclosing the terrace space. The terrace shall remain open and unenclosed. Don Moscato Okay, are we all comfortable with those conditions?And the resolution? Everyone okay with them? Yes. Okay. Let's go ahead and vote. We have Steve. Steve Berger Yes. Don Moscato Glen? Glenn Brettschneider Yes. Don Moscato Jamie? Jamie Schutzer Yes. Don Moscato Joel? Joel Simon Yes. Don Moscato Don?Yes. Okay. Application is approved five yeses, no nays. Congratulations. - 12- Transcribed by https:Hotter.ai Justin Minieri Thank you. Thank Don Moscato Justin. Don't go too far away now. Justin Minieri I'm going to just stop sharing this screen right now. #21-008 1.2- Yuval Meron &Jana Meron 46 Winding Wood Road Construct a 2nd floor addition,wood deck, rear masonry patio expansion ai Don Moscato Okay, let me go ahead and make the introduction. Okay. Okay, the second application this evening is application 21-008.Yuval Meron&Jana Meron, 46 Winding Wood Road, to construct a second floor addition,wood deck, rear masonry patio expansion and interior alterations. Once again,we'll be hearing from Justin Minieri, the architect. Glenn Brettschneider And before Justin speaks, I would expect that I am recused. This houses across the street and one over so I will not be participating in any decision making other than as a neighbor, but not with the Board. Don Moscato Okay,in that regard,Justin, you're aware that in order for the application to be approved,you're going to need three out of the four non excused members of the board. Justin Minieri Yes, I know thank you. Don Moscato Okay, please proceed. Justin Minieri Good evening. My name is Justin Minieri. I'm here for the application at 46 Winding Wood Road the owners are Yuval and Jana Meron and I like to start sharing my screen and we'll get right into it. - 13- Transcribed by https://otter.ai Okay. No wait a minute it won't let me. Will you allow me to share the screen? I'm not on for some reason it keeps going back. Drew Gamils That's weird Justin I didn't change anything. Justin Minieri I keep going back to the old screen that's why I'm,let me see. See the photos? No, no. Michael Izzo No. Justin Minieri No?Why am I not able to share?Let me start again. Why am I having. Alright, let me try again. I'm going to share my screen, share. All right, here we go. I guess some, there was some residual stuff left open on yours. I apologize. So let me start with the photos. Yeah, this is the front of the house. We're proposing to add to the side. Let me make it quick,let me get one of the rear and then I'll move on to the dormer. There are more photos, taken so long looking at photos, and this is the rear of the house. Alright, so let me go to the drawings and then I'll explain the project. Okay. What we're proposing is the Meron family is growing, so they need some additional bedrooms and living space. So,what we're proposing is adding a second floor addition over the one story house, as you can see, so we're adding a second floor addition,we're complying with the setback, so there's no setbacks issue. And we're adding a wood deck, and we're rebuilding the one story sunroom. And this is the height setback ratio,let me go, this is the existing first floor. Again, we're rebuilding the sunroom into a family room,we're adding the wood deck. Those areas are over compliance. So, this is where we're adding that's triggering the need for a variance,we're adding a second floor addition, which consists of three bedrooms. And as you can see,we're not adding over the entire footprint, I tried this smallest possible. Oh, I think I hear background noise now. So,we're adding three bedrooms, a couple bathrooms and a laundry room and it's to the rear of the house. As you can see. This is the existing front of the house. So, and we're adding some roof lines to give us some curb appeal. But as you can see, the second story addition doesn't really appear in the front of the house. So,it really doesn't impact the front, the streetscape. Here's a side elevation. This is the sunroom side. So, as you can see, I buried the second floor addition to the rear. And so, from the side and, here's the second floor and treated as a shed, so we minimize the impact on the neighbors in the surrounding areas. As you can see here, this is the gable end of the existing house. And here's the proposed second floor addition. Again,we push back the addition a little further in to reduce the bulk of the second floor. So,we're asking for two variances. One is a FAR variance. Where the code is 3,226. And we're proposing 3,617. So,we're 391 square feet of variance,which comes out to - 14- Transcribed by https://otter.ai 12.12%. The second variance is the again, the height setback ratio. And the problem here is the grade drops quite a bit down. And so,it really hurts us. And that's why we're adding a second story, eight foot ceilings,we're not adding a huge addition on top, but because of the grade elevation, the angles gets dropped. And so,we need a variance of.30 the code requires 1.6 and we're at 1.9. So that's a variance of 18.7%. So,we're coming jammed up over here. As you can see this the other side,we're fine. And you can see from a neighborhood appearance,we're not adding.we're minimizing the second floor addition, as you can see. So, it's a living space much needed for the young growing family. So again,we try to be mindful for their needs, and balance it out with the, what you know, the minimum we can do. And we're coming before you with the request of these two variances. So, I know the Meron's reached out to the neighbors they're in the audience if you want to talk to them,but the neighbors were in favor of the project, they didn't have any objections, and I'm ready for any comments or questions. Don Moscato Okay, Mickey, am I unmuted here or? Michael Izzo No, Don. I can hear you. Yes, yes. Drew Gamils Your phone is clear. I just muted your computer. So, there's no feedback. Don Moscato Okay. Mickey can you comment on the previous variance which was granted to the previous owner?And does that side yard setback have any impact on the need for this particular various or are they totally independent? For the benefit of the board? Michael Izzo Certainly Don, the previous variance in 2010 was on the opposite side of the house.Justin,if you want to bring that up. Justin Minieri Yeah, it's the sunroom. It's right over here. Michael Izzo Yeah, it's a sunroom down on the opposite side of the home. Right here. And it has it has no bearing on either these variances before the board. - 15- Transcribed by https://otter.ai Don Moscato Okay,very good. Thank you. And Drew, did we did we receive official letters from any of the owners? and neighbors? I should say. I know Justin alluded to this. Justin Minieri There's emails. Michael Izzo I can chime in Don and Justin on that. We have in our possession, copies of email correspondence that were that were received from the village we received them today. Actually, the sixth. I think Tara did distribute them. So,you have them electronically. And I have them before me. Don Moscato Could you just give the names and the addresses? If they're in support or in disagreement? Michael Izzo We have the Klein family at 50 Winding Wood Road in support. We have,let's see now here we have, I believe, the Gutierrez family at 47 Winding Wood Road North. Both of those, both of those individuals,both of those neighbors are in full support of the application. Don Moscato Okay. Michael Izzo And I believe those are the only two those are the only two I have. If I'm incorrect,Justin can chime in here. Justin Minieri Yeah, that's the only two I have. I mean, the homeowners in the audience. I'm sure they can speak to more if they want to come into the conversation. Jana Meron Sorry, those are the two neighbors that we see most regularly. The neighbor, Don Moscato Excuse me, excuse me. Please identify yourself formally for the record. - 16- Transcribed by https://otter.ai Jana Meron Oh, I'm sorry. This is Jana Meron. I'm one of the homeowners, my husband Yuval he's here as well. Yuval Meron Hello. Don Moscato Please continue. Jana Meron So, the neighbor to the other side of us is very rarely here. So,we didn't have an opportunity to discuss this with them in detail. Yuval Meron They are on the garage side. So, the left side of the house,which is probably the least affected by the addition. The Klem's we have a letter from is on the, to the right of us. I think that's where the setback will be. Jana Meron Yeah. Yuval Meron And the Gutierrez family is across the street in front of the house. Michael Izzo So, Don the Klein's who we have a letter of support is the most effective neighbor in this instance. Don Moscato Okay, thank you,Mickey. Every so often I'm ready to call the Rye Brook Fire Inspector on you. Yeah, smoke blares out from your head, over the screen. Michael Izzo It's only a cigar Don. Don Moscato Okay, yes. Right. Okay. We have those letters. Are there any board members want to comment to Justin regarding the application? - 17- Transcribed by https://otter.ai Jamie Schutzer My only question Justin, on the left side above the garage and the right side. On that roofline, there's nothing going above there. Right. That's just. Justin Minieri Okay. Let me get to the elevation before I answer. Well, here's the second floor. So, here's the entire garage side, nothing is going over, except for dummy roof lines to just add some aesthetic appeal. You can see the front;the three rooms are in the back. And this is buried underneath the roofline. So,the only window you see is, represents bringing daylight into the foyer below. That's the extent of it. Jamie Schutzer Okay, thanks. Don Moscato Okay. Mickey, are you aware of any water issues? In that particular area on that side of Winding Wood? Michael Izzo None, no there's no issues there Don that I'm aware of. Don Moscato Okay. Thank you, Steve, or and,Joel,you have any questions for Justin? Steve Berger I don't, I'm good with it. Joel Simon I'm okay too. J Don Moscato Okay. Very good. With respect to Okay, now that we heard those in support, and let me ask if there's anyone else who wants to speak in favor the application,who has not either submitted a letter or commented at this point? Do you want to say something at this at this point?Are you comfortable with things the way they are? Okay, not hearing anyone. Anyone want to speak against the application? There being none. Can I have a motion to close the public hearing. Seconded. Okay. All in favor of closing public hearing fine. Let me go through the factors we heard with - 18- Transcribed by https://otter.ai respect to the smallest possible variance. Are we all comfortable with the explanation that we heard from architect Minieri? Okay,good. It doesn't look like there's an environmental issue. How about the character the neighborhood? If at this particular point, could I ask our recused board member if he's still around to comment on whether or not he thinks as a resident this will impact the character of the neighborhood?Are you there Glenn? Glenn Brettschneider Yes, I am. I actually think it will,will impact the character of the neighborhood. But I would say in a positive way. And I'm )ust a little disappointed that I actually have not met my neighbors until tonight, but I hope to soon, but I look forward to the addition, quietly,I hope, but I look forward to it. Yuval Meron I look forward to meeting you too. Glenn Brettschneider I have the two, I have the two dogs by the way if you see them walking the cream coated retriever and the lab.Just say hello. And give them some treats. Thanks. Don Moscato Then we agree that the variances are self-created. Can we agree that the variances are substantial, coming in at 12 and 18? Something percent?Yeah. Yeah. Okay, and they will not affect the character as supported by neighbor, Glenn. And there'll be no physical or environmental issues with respect to this application. So let me go ahead and read the resolution. RESOLUTION WHEREAS, application has been made to the Zoning Board by Yuval Meron &Jana Meron (the "Applicants") for (1) a gross floor area variance of 391 square feet where the maximum allowable gross floor area is 3,226 square feet pursuant to Village Code § 250-20.E, and (2) a side height setback ratio variance of 0.30 where the maximum allowable side height setback ratio is 1.60 pursuant to Village Code § 250-20.I(2), in connection with the proposed second floor addition,wood deck, rear masonry patio expansion and interior alterations, on property located at 46 Winding Wood Road, in an R-15 zoning district on the east side of Winding Wood Road, approximately 450 feet from the intersection of Latonia Road and Winding Wood Road. Said - 19- Transcribed by https://otter.ai premises being known and designated on the tax map of the Village of Rye Brook as Parcel ID# 135.34-1-9; and WHEREAS, a duly advertised public hearing was held April 6, 2021, at which time all those wishing to be heard were given such opportunity; and WHEREAS, the public hearing was closed on April 6, 2021; and WHEREAS, the proposed action is a Type II action pursuant to the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act and accordingly, no further environmental review is required; and WHEREAS, the Board, from the application, after viewing the premises and neighborhood concerned, and upon considering each of the factors set forth Village Code § 250-13(G)(b)[2][a]-[e] of the Rye Brook Code, finds: 1) The variances WILL NOT create an adverse impact to the character of the neighborhood; 2) The benefit the Applicants seek CANNOT be achieved through another method, feasible for the Applicants to pursue, that does not require the variances; 3) The variances ARE substantial; 4) The variances WILL NOT create any adverse impacts to the physical or environmental conditions of the neighborhood; and 5) The need for the variances IS self-created. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the said application for (1) a gross floor area variance of 391 square feet where the maximum allowable gross floor area is 3,226 square feet pursuant to Village Code § 250-20.E, and (2) a side height setback ratio variance of 0.30 where the maximum allowable side height setback ratio is 1.60 pursuant to Village Code § 250-20.I(2), in connection with the proposed second floor addition, wood deck, rear masonry patio expansion and - 20- Transcribed by https://otter.ai interior alterations, on property located at 46 Winding Wood Road, is hereby GRANTED on the following conditions: 1) No permit or certificate of occupancy shall be issued until the Applicants have paid in full all application and consultant fees incurred by the Village in connection with the review of this application. Don Moscato And I believe we're not going to condition this further based on the comments that the board has made. So, are we all in agreement? Are we ready to take a vote?Yes. Okay, Steve? Steve Berger Yes. Don Moscato Glenn is excused,Jamie. Jamie Schutzer Yes. Don Moscato Joel? Joel Simon Yes. Don Moscato Don, yes. application is approved four yeses, zero nays. And one excused. Thank you very much. Congratulations, and good luck. Justin Minieri Thank you very much. Good night. - 21 - Transcribed by https:Hotter.ai #21-005 1.3. Matthew Altman&Alexandra Altman 42 Lawridge Drive Legalize re-constructed rear deck. Don Moscato Okay. All right. Let me go back to the main screen here and let me get the next application. Okay, next application is item number 21-005,Matthew Altman and Alexandra Altman of 46 Lawridge Drive, legalize a re-constructed rear deck. Michael Izzo 42 Lawridge, Don, 42. Don Moscato Didn't I say that? Michael Izzo I think you said 46. Don Moscato Okay, that's because my eyes dropped up to the previous application. Thank you for that. What is that called?When you see something? Michael Izzo I got your back Don. I got your back. Don Moscato Okay,we have our familiar Brad DeMotte. Brad DeMotte Good evening. My name is Brad DeMotte. I'm an architect. I'm representing Matt and Ali Altman who live at 42 Lawridge. They've lived there for nine years, and or in Rye Brook for nine years, a year and a half at that address. So,we are requesting a variance to allow a recently constructed deck to exceed the maximum allowable coverage which is 4%. And we'd be at 4.1% or it's an increase of 0.1%which is 14 square feet above the max allowable. So, this is just a little backstory. There's an existing two level deck and let me do a screen share here. All right, there was, hopefully we can see that there's, this is the previous deck. It was a two level deck,it was in a state of disrepair and they hired a contractor who's a good builder but he was unfamiliar with Rye Brook. He was under the - 22- Transcribed by https://otter.ai assumption that he could remove the deck and rebuild the deck in the same place and kind of saw that as a repair, replacement. So,what he did without a permit is to build a new deck. And let's see if we can find that. Let's see,well, here's a photo of the deck that was built. And so, and again, this was really,wasn't done intentionally it was really an oversight. He was under the impression he could build this without a permit as a repair. And the building inspector saw the activity, he issued a stop work order a couple months ago, I was brought in to clean up the mess. And as we, as we were completing the building permit application to legalize it,we also we found out that we were slightly over the maximal allowable of coverage for a deck. So that's why we are here tonight. So again, Don Moscato Would you consider that an official oops, on the part of the contractor? Brad DeMotte Absolutely. And believe me, he regrets it and won't do it again. Don Moscato Okay. Is the name of his company Well Dunn? Brad DeMotte Yes,it is. Don Moscato I thought that was ironic. Brad DeMotte Well, he's a good builder. But in this case, you know, he dropped the ball when it came to the approval process. Okay, so coincidentally, the previous deck was 656 square feet,which was right at the maximum allowable limit, this deck was constructed. And this is a different size and shape. The other one was somewhat octagonal. This is simply really just two levels and fairly rectangular. And this is the total of 670 square feet. So,it is 14 square feet above the maximum allowable limit. Again,it's,you know, 4%versus 4.1%. And we have two letters of support from the adjacent neighbors,which I believe were in the file. And as far as the balancing test goes,you know, this, this is not substantial. There's no undesirable change to the neighborhood, there's no adverse effects, really can't be achieved by any other method,you know, and but it was self-created. So,we open up to any comments, - 23- Transcribed by https://otter.ai Don Moscato Can you just officially state why it would not make sense for the board to demand that that 14 feet be reclaimed.Just for the record,please? Brad DeMotte Well, the board would have that right to do that. And we did,we did, and actually,Mr. Izzo did recommend that as an option to avoid the variance. And we discussed it between all of us. And it's, a rather expensive fix to remove 14 square feet from either one of these decks, and therefore we chose to ask for the variance. Don Moscato Okay, thanks. Thank you very much. Any board members want to ask Brad DeMotte a question regarding is? Okay, there being total silence on this one. Let me just kind of quickly summarize the five factors this would be classified as a de minimis request, according to my interpretation, do you all concur that it will, all of the five factors will not be adversely impacted?My only question is, would this count as a self-created since it was done by an agent of the owners? Joel Simon Without question. It's definitely self-created. Don Moscato Okay. Very good. Thank you for that legal opinion. I appreciate that one. It's not substantial,will not affect the character,will not affect the environment. And we heard from the architect why this will be not. Now, are you in possession of the letters, Mickey, are you? Brad DeMotte They were submitted. You should have those in your file. They're there. Don Moscato I just want that publicly in the record on the video of Brad that's all. Brad DeMotte Yes. Okay. Thank you. Michael Izzo Yes, Don we received both letters on March 2, two letters of support. One from the neighbor at 38 Lawridge Drive and one from the neighbor at 44 Lawridge Drive both in support. - 24- Transcribed by https://otter.ai Don Moscato All right, thanks. Thank you very much. Is anyone on the online here who would like to comment on that favorably or unfavorably? Not hearing anyone. Can I have a motion to close public hearing? Jamie Schutzer So moved. Don Moscato Seconded. Joel Simon Second. Don Moscato Okay. I guess we're all in agreement to close the public hearing. Okay. You heard my, my particular assessment and Steve indicated that we'll consider this to be self-created. So, can I go ahead and read through it? Steve Berger It wasn't me who said that it was Glenn. Joel Simon It was me. Steve Berger Or Joel. It wasn't me. Don Moscato Oh, oh. ok. Joel Simon I wouldn't call it a legal opinion. It was a personal opinion. - 25- Transcribed by https:Hotter.ai Don Moscato Okay, no, but I value your insight in that. I was not sure how the rest of the board members would be comfortable with that, but I'm glad you brought forward that Joel. Okay,let me read the resolution. RESOLUTION WHEREAS, application has been made to the Zoning Board by Matthew Altman & Alexandra Altman (the "Applicants") for a deck coverage variance of 0.1 % where the maximum allowable deck coverage is 4% pursuant to Village Code § 250-37.B, in connection with the proposed legalization of the re-constructed rear deck, on property located at 42 Lawridge Drive,in an R-15 zoning district on the east side of Lawridge Drive, at the intersection of Parkwood Place and Lawridge Drive. Said premises being known and designated on the tax map of the Village of Rye Brook as Parcel ID# 129.67-1-51; and WHEREAS, a duly advertised public hearing was held April 6, 2021, at which time all those wishing to be heard were given such opportunity; and WHEREAS, the public hearing was closed on April 6, 2021; and WHEREAS, the proposed action is a Type II action pursuant to the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act and accordingly, no further environmental review is required; and WHEREAS, the Board, from the application, after viewing the premises and neighborhood concerned, and upon considering each of the factors set forth in Village Code § 250-13(G)(b)[2][a]- [e] of the Rye Brook Code, finds: 1) The variance WILL NOT create an adverse impact to the character of the neighborhood; 2) The benefit the Applicants seek CANNOT be achieved through another method, feasible for the Applicants to pursue, that does not require the variance; - 26 - Transcribed by https:Hotter.ai 3) The variance IS NOT substantial; 4) The variance WILL NOT create any adverse impacts to the physical or environmental conditions of the neighborhood; and 5) The need for the variance IS self-created. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the said application for a deck coverage variance of 0.1 % where the maximum allowable deck coverage is 4% pursuant to Village Code 250-37.13, in connection with the proposed legalization of the re-constructed rear deck, on property located at 42 Lawridge Drive,is hereby GRANTED on the following conditions: 1) No permit or certificate of occupancy shall be issued until the Applicants have paid in full all application and consultant fees incurred by the Village in connection with the review of this application. Don Moscato Okay, and we're ready for a vote. As we're all comfortable with that while Mickey is in a cloud. Steve? Steve Berger Yes. Don Moscato Glenn? Glenn Brettschneider Yes. Don Moscato Jamie? - 27- Transcribed by https://otter.ai Jamie Schutzer Yes. Don Moscato Joel? Joel Simon Yes. Don Moscato Don yes. Okay. Application approved five yeses, zero nays. Congratulations. Thank you, The Altman and thank you, Mr. DeMotte. Brad DeMotte Thank you, and goodnight. Alexandra Altman Thank you. Don Moscato Okay,we're going to go back to the sequencing. The next application is I have number 21-009 Joseph Sandarciero III and Stephanie Sandarciero of 112 Country Ridge Drive to construct new rear patio with fire pits and sitting walls. Okay,who's going to be making the presentations? Is that you Chris? Evan Sakofsky This is Evan Sakofsky. I'm the architect for the project. Don Moscato Okay, okay. Now I see fine. Please go ahead. Evan Sakofsky I'm going to go ahead and share my screen just to get the site plan up on there. Okay, can everybody see that? Is this visible to everyone? Michael Izzo Yeah. Okay. - 28- Transcribed by https://otter.ai Evan Sakofsky So yes,we are proposing to add a 399 square foot patio to the rear of the house directly adjacent to the rear of the house. This,we're requesting a variance of 885 square feet for impervious coverage. So obviously what that means is that we have non-conforming situation already with respect to impervious coverage,which is largely being caused by the existing pool and patio. Those were constructed in, according to the building departments records in 1977. So, they've been there for quite some time. And basically,we are requesting to add to that impervious coverage to create a safer and more accessible entertaining space that can be on this rear yard. You know, right now, the homeowner, they have younger children. And just it just seems dangerous to them that whenever they want to use their hardscape, for entertaining that it's right next to an open swimming pool. Obviously, there's a major inconvenience here as well, the access to this current existing patio is over 40 feet from the rear of the house. But really, their concern here has to do with safety.And we feel that the patio that we're proposing is modest. It's just large enough to give them the functions that they're looking for. And we hope we will be granted this variance for those reasons. I don't hear anything. Does anybody have any questions about it? Joel Simon This is Joel. Evan Sakofsky Hi. Joel Simon Is there anything that can be done here? I understand what your goal is, but to,in any way reconfigured to gain some, you know, to gain something from some more ground, as opposed to the concrete that you currently have? Evan Sakofsky Well, I mean, are you suggesting demolishing some portion of this patio? Joel Simon Possibly Yes. Evan Sakofsky I mean I guess,you know, from our perspective, I mean, I'm,you know, I understand the reasoning behind that it just seems somewhat unreasonable, from our perspective to have to suddenly remove something that's been there for four decades. - 29- Transcribed by https://otter.ai Joel Simon It's no more unreasonable than adding at this point, either, but. Evan Sakofsky Right, right. I mean,we, I understand the question. But,you know, obviously, the homeowner would prefer not to have to remove anything since it, since it has been there. And certainly, they didn't create that situation. Don Moscato But you are asking for an extension of an existing nonconformity that has, historically, the board looks extra carefully at requests to enhance an existing nonconformity. I think that was the logic behind Joel's question. Evan Sakofsky Sure. Don Moscato I also feel the same way about that. But my comment has to do with the 399 square foot, you're staying one foot below the trigger number of 400 square feet for some type of water mitigation. Evan Sakofsky Correct. Don Moscato You are covering a lot of land in the back, especially with respect to what is there now. So,would you entertain, or do you have any plans for some type of water management proposal to go along with this increased impervious coverage? Evan Sakofsky There were not and I mean, that was largely the reason for the modest size of the proposed patio, obviously adding any sort of stormwater management,you know, comes at in,you know, a large additional expense,you know,with respect to the project,you know, so it was something that we were looking to avoid in this case, by keeping it the modest size. Don Moscato Well, yeah,we'll be the,what is the exact dimension of the proposed enhancement?The square footage. - 30- Transcribed by https://otter.ai Evan Sakofsky The square footage is 399 square feet. If I jump to the first page.... Don Moscato What are those dimensions? What is it 20 by 20? Evan Sakofsky It is 21 foot three by 18 foot nine. Steve Berger So, my concern, following up on that is sort of like the last application, we just heard the oopsie 399,very close to 400. Very easy to go over. Is there a way to make sure that you don't go over, and then come back to us and say, sorry, make it less than 399? I think that's what.... Evan Sakofsky I mean, I think I, you know, we are aware of what we're up against. Steve Berger It just seems too cute. That's all. Evan Sakofsky I mean, I just,you know, I think that the dimensions and the square footage that we're showing on this drawing,which obviously we're submitting for the permit here are, are bolded. I mean,we are emphasizing that we cannot exceed this, these dimensions. I'm not sure, from our perspective,what else we could do in terms of the application. You know, I mean, if there's a condition that you're proposing, I mean, you know, I certainly think we would entertain that. Steve Berger Can't you bring it in, you know, in on one side, shortening by a foot. So,we're not anywhere close to 399. Evan Sakofsky I mean, I think we could probably take a few inches out of the longer dimension here. Steve Berger I guess it seems to me, it's a fairly large yard, I don't understand why it's only a few inches. I mean, why what. - 31 - Transcribed by https://otter.ai Evan Sakofsky What would be a comfortable amount from your perspective? Steve Berger I'm not in a position to make that judgment. All I'm saying is 399 is awfully close to 400. And,you know,we just had to go through an application,when somebody said,Yeah, a good builder. I'm sure you're an excellent architect and your builders very good. But, I mean,why do we have to run that kind of risk? Evan Sakofsky I hear what you're saying. I mean,I guess we can come back, and certainly reduce this by some amount. But I,you know, I'm hesitant to throw a number out there that would suddenly make this not functional. Steve Berger I'm not, I'm not asking, I'm not asking you to do that on the fly in any way, shape, or form. And why you should do it,you know,if you're going to do this, and I'm not saying that we're there yet. But it seems to me when you're trying to do something a 399. It's too easy to miss and it just seems too contrived. Glenn Brettschneider Steve, let me ask this. A couple of things. So,we ever said if, since this isn't an oopsie,it's,you know, plan to be 399. That, if it ever came back, that we would know, or we would,we would require that it be 399?We would not give into an oopsie? Steve Berger Well, the thing is,you know, that it becomes a big expense. And we look,you know, I can't tell you, Don,you and I've been on the board a long time.Joel as well, I mean, how many oopies did we have over the years, a lot? Glenn Brettschneider Right. Steve Berger That's why we make a record. - 32- Transcribed by https://otter.ai Glenn Brettschneider Right. But in this case, the oopsie would be on architect Evan and the homeowner,because they're aware of our concerns. So, I'm thinking that is an issue. The other question,the two things I just want to bring up is the fact that it has to be a paver. I've seen pavers that are not completely solid, okay, you know, I don't know what they're called. But they're kind of pavers, there grass, there pavers,maybe they're hollow, just as an idea. And the other thing I'm thinking is,is that is the fact that there's a retaining wall does that affect this at all in terms of size or is that. Evan Sakofsky It's not a retaining wall. It's just a sitting wall. Glenn Brettschneider No, I'm sorry, I didn't, I'm sorry. I didn't mean a retaining wall. Well,it?Well,it,it retains the beauty of that house that's what I meant. A sitting wall. Yeah. Which is,which is,you know, I guess sitting on top, and then I don't know visually, that adds a lot more impervious surface to an area that you just wanted, so it's not near the pool. It kind of seems is overwhelming in terms of a lot of paver. It looks beautiful. I'm just, I don't know if that's an issue for the board. I'm just throwing it out there,is that even a consideration for us? Jamie Schutzer Can I ask a question?What is a sitting wall? Evan Sakofsky It's a well actually, this photo would show when,pretty accurately here. It's just a wall that's built there that you could actually sit on. It's sitting height,it's not retaining any earth. So,it's just a low wall. It's what's added. It's decorative. Steve Berger It's not really affecting the impervious right? Evan Sakofsky Well, it's counted as part of the impervious. I mean, it's reducing our usable area here. But I will say, just to kind of address the previous question a little bit in that regard,is that there is a slight slope to the land here. So,we're anticipating needing steps up on these sides anyway,which would eat into that usable upper surface. So, in my opinion, adding the wall is not really taking away from the space, certainly being counted in the 399. But I don't know, even if we took the wall away, I think you would just have steps here instead. So, I don't know. - 33- Transcribed by https://otter.ai Glenn Brettschneider The walls, for us the walls a visual thing and doesn't really affect our decision. Evan Sakofsky Right, exactly. Glenn Brettschneider I think. Evan Sakofsky I was just trying to address the question. Glenn Brettschneider Yeah, no, I appreciate that. Again, I'm not sure whether if there was no wall,would that be easier for the board to accept? Or it's complete?You know,they may say it's completely irrelevant. I have not come across this before. Evan Sakofsky Okay. Don Moscato Well, I guess Glenn, another way to ask that question would be if you took the seating area away, would it reduce the impervious coverage? Or is that sitting on the patio itself that would in fact reduce the impervious coverage by the width of the sitting walk around this perimeter? Glenn Brettschneider Yeah, I don't know where? I mean, I think, I think what he said is that it is part of, so I guess if you have it,you still have the patio, pavers at that same length anyway. So that wouldn't affect the. Evan Sakofsky Right. And like,what I was saying is that you'd still need the step up here on this, on this perimeter. So even if we took the wall away,we would probably just run the step continuously around this edge, it really wouldn't change anything.And Glenn Brettschneider I guess what I'm asking the board is,is the wall even an issue for us at all? If it doesn't add to the impervious surface? - 34- Transcribed by https://otter.ai Steve Berger I don't think it is then Glenn. That's my take on it. If it doesn't affect the impervious that's not, that's not a zoning board issue. Don Moscato I have a question regarding where you had the cursor on the bottom of a fire pit. Evan Sakofsky Let me go back, Yep. Don Moscato What is the distance from the edge of the patio to the fire pit?going?Right there. Yeah,where the cursor is. Evan Sakofsky From here to here? Don Moscato Yes. Evan Sakofsky It's actually on here. It's three feet. Don Moscato Okay. I want to make sure that. Okay. Now, if you did shorten the length side, that would necessitate moving the pit further along on that, or would it stay the same?Yeah. Evan Sakofsky I mean,what I would anticipate if we were to shorten up this length would be that it would come out of this side, and that everything would shift,you know, from bottom to top here. I mean, obviously, I don't want to make this too small,where you know, I'm putting the walk here,which might seem fair. But you know that would be where we would have to probably take the length out, is what I would see. Don Moscato Okay, thank you. - 35- Transcribed by https://otter.ai Evan Sakofsky Sure. Don Moscato Does anyone else have any additional questions? Joel Simon I just wanted to say that I'm, I'm not happy with this simply because in my mind, there's just too much impervious. very blunt, I'd rather, I'd want to see either a reduction in the existing concrete surface or something up with the new construction making, making it a smaller area. Don Moscato If Yeah, I'm in the same, I'm in the same viewpoint that you are Joel. Glenn Brettschneider Yeah, if we want to be consistent. If you remember the Klein's from earlier today,who gave that letter of approval. There're the family across the street from me, and they added a basketball court in their backyard. And one of the requirements because they have a big circular driveway was that one of us, I guess it became agreed upon by majority ask that they had a patio,which I think they asked to have removed as part of the addition to the basketball court. So, I think in follow up to what you're saying is it will be consistent with a prior decision of the board to consider reducing the concrete patio, by the pool. That patio on the Klein house was there when they bought the house very similar. So,it's not the years it's been there. So,it wouldn't be a unique request. I'm not, I'm not saying that we should do that. I'm just saying it's consistent with what Joel and Don have said. Don Moscato Sure. Joel Simon Glenn, I'm not, I'm not even going to suggest what it is that should be done. I raised those two choices, the existing concrete, or the new patio as two options but, and every and every property is different. And you know what, right,what was right for one isn't necessarily right for another. But I think something needs to be done here. To address these issues. Evan Sakofsky Would consideration be done to, I mean, anything that is counting towards impervious here, and it doesn't have to be the patio, the other patio? Or would you consider anything that would help to alleviate stress? - 36- Transcribed by https://otter.ai Joel Simon Such as what, what are you thinking? Evan Sakofsky I mean Joe, are you on? the homeowner was on as well,I just want to make sure he's participating in this conversation. But we have talked previously, if this became an issue about possibly removing this shed here, which is. Joseph Sandarciero III That's not on. No, because that's not on an impervious, that's on cinder blocks? Evan Sakofsky No but it is counted towards the impervious in this calculation. If that's not something that you want to do,I just, I just wanted to mention that just because it, I thought we had previously discussed it, but we can, we can hold on that for sure. Joseph Sandarciero III Yeah, I mean whatever. It's I guess,it's easier to take down the shed then do a jackhammer to a patio, right? It's a lot less cost efficient. Joel Simon Or, or reduce the size of the new patio? Evan Sakofsky Right. I mean. Joseph Sandarciero III It'll take away some of the functionality of the patio. I mean, we're talking 399. You guys don't want 399. Because that's the number but that's, we went at that number because that was the number that was recommended by your bylaws, more or less. If it was. Joel Simon Not the one recommended,it's the one that.... Joseph Sandarciero III Would there be a difference? - 37 - Transcribed by https:Hotter.ai Joel Simon The one that triggers additional work. Joseph Sandarciero III No, I get that. Joel Simon That's not the same thing as recommended. Joseph Sandarciero III And you're using me for the previous applicant before. Joel Simon No, that's not fair, sir. We've been,we deal with this issue all the time. Not just based on the previous applicant. Joseph Sandarciero III You brought it up. That's why I mentioned it. Joel Simon I did, I did bring it up. I agree with you. But it's not, that's not why would that's not why we're bringing it up with you if that previous applicant had not been there the same issue would have come up. Don Moscato Yeah, I think there are several options that can be considered. One of the things that I would like to do is get a sense of all of the board members, as we close the public hearing, to get to go through some of these issues in a deliberative fashion. Once we close, once we close the public hearing. So, are there any other questions that you want to ask? Joel Simon Now, before we do that a question, just as a proper procedure, do we close the public hearing if they're possibly going to go back and rework this? Or do we need to keep the public hearing open? Drew Gamils Joel thank you. I'm sorry,you took the words away from me. I agree. I think the board should discuss this before closing the public hearing, because if the applicant is going to go back and - 38- Transcribed by https://otter.ai contemplate,you know, changing these plans, removing impervious surface elsewhere, the public hearing should remain open, because there potentially would be a change. Joel Simon I get it right occasionally. Don Moscato Okay,very good. Michael Izzo Hey Don. The other option,which I want to bring it to the board's attention is to allow them to build this thing this size and require some sort of modest stormwater management that might address the added impervious coverage rather than full capture,which is what's required at 400 square feet. That's another option that the board might want to think about. Joel Simon Exactly. There are various options. We just named a few. If they can think of other things that will, would satisfy the board. We're open,we're open to various suggestions. Don Moscato Okay. Okay, let me ask if there's anyone online, who would like to speak in favor of the application. Okay, is there anyone who wants to speak against the application? Okay,let us deliberate as a board then with respect to each, each of us going through our, our positions or concerns. So,if.... Michael Izzo Don if I could interrupt your very quickly, just for the record,we did receive on April 1, two letters regarding the application, one from 111 Country Ridge Drive. It's a letter in support of the application, and the other from 116 Country Ridge Drive. And it is also in support of the application. Don Moscato Okay, thanks. Thank you very much. Okay. Let me go through, I guess alphabetically. Steve, do you want to summarize your concerns or position on this application? Steve Berger Sure. I'm, I'm sympathetic to the need or the desire of the homeowner to do this and be able to use the backyard, the way, the way he'd like to use it and connect the patio to the house, I'm sympathetic to that. I just think that there's a lot of space here. And rather than pushing up against - 39- Transcribed by https://otter.ai the limit, I'd like to see some effort to either change the size. I mean, this is a fairly large addition. So, I'm not convinced that if you cut it back by a foot or two on one side or the other side,it's not usable. But I'm also concerned about bumping up against stormwater management problems. So, I'd like to hear some proposals to go one way or the other. I think there's got to be some level of, you know,we've got issues of precedent with other homeowners in the past,going forward. And I don't think that, I think we need to pay attention to what could happen. So that's my concern. Don Moscato Okay, Glenn, how about you? Glenn Brettschneider Yeah, I actually don't disagree with Steve. But I do think it's a, a very functional and beautiful design. And, and I actually am sympathetic, also, because I think without this,you have an area by the pool. And if I'm correct, I don't think there's really anything in between the house and the pool itself. Is that correct. Evan Sakofsky There is not, no, there's a lot of grass right now. Glenn Brettschneider Right?And, and so I actually would like to see something that is amenable to the board. But I really, I really actually do like this design. I just don't know if it's, there is a lot of impervious surface in this yard. So. Don Moscato Okay.Jamie. Jamie Schutzer Hi. You know,you'd mentioned about the shed as a possible option. So, I see on the plans that are there, two sheds, they're there. Don Moscato One is pool equipment. Jamie Schutzer Right, but is it a functional shed? Or is it just covering, just covering the pool equipment? -40- Transcribed by https://otter.ai Evan Sakofsky I'm actually not sure offhand. I haven't paid close attention to those sheds in the past. I'll admit. Joseph Sandarciero III The one on your, on the bottom end of the screen is like a Rubbermaid storage shed. Jamie Schutzer Okay. Don Moscato Okay, thank you.Joel, how about you? Joel Simon Alright,yeah, as I mentioned earlier, there's a lack of impervious on, on the, on this property. The design is gorgeous. There's no, no one disputes that, but I think it needs to go slightly back to the drawing board.And something needs to be figured out. Don Moscato Okay,where I am coming at it that, I think that the lot is 23,000, just slightly over half an acre. And I just think there's too much impervious coverage being requested. And as a result, I think that I was going to propose and that water mitigation or the water management plan I think would be the preferred approach to go. Given, they want to keep that design the way it is, and I agree with everyone else,it's an attractive design, but I think something has to be given up here. And either you reduce the impervious coverage, not by just removing the shed, that was proposed, I don't think that goes far enough. So,if the applicant wants that patio, the way it is designed, I think they will have to come up with some kind of water management and as Mickey suggested,it does not have to be a full blown, full blown capture, but something that does impact the water, the water outflow from the, from the proposal. So, you know, I think by chopping the proposal lengthwise, I think it will,it will definitely impact the aesthetics of it and probably reduced the functionality. So, so, I would encourage the introduction of some kind of water management proposal,which would be able to be signed off by the administrator. In this case,it would be Mike Nowak, and or for a significant reduction elsewhere on the property of the impervious the impervious coverage, because you're looking at you know, 885 square feet variance,which is significant from the allowable, so, you are trying to do, technically too much on the land that you have,given the size of the lot, and the bulk standards with respect to impervious coverage. So, so I would have a hard time supporting this application as it exists now. Okay, having said that, Drew, do you want to chime in now and make a suggestion as to steps forward that the applicant can take at this particular point in time. -41 - Transcribed by https://otter.ai Drew Gamils I can advise as to what steps the board could take, the board could issue a denial tonight,but it sounds like you'd like to see the applicant go back and think creatively about some other options. So, I would therefore recommend that the board adjourn the public hearing to next month, and let the applicant go back and come up with some proposals that address the board's concerns, and then discuss this application again next month. Don Moscato Yeah, I prefer not to go for a vote at this particular point in time, but I'd like to get a sense of the other board members on my concerns for that. Do you concur? Joel Simon I would definitely concur. Steve Berger That's fine with me. Joel Simon Is the applicant amenable, amenable to that? Evan Sakofsky Yeah, I mean, ultimately,we want to try to work with the board, of course, and find a way to get this approved. Don Moscato I think, Evan,you're well on your way. It's just a matter of deciding where you want to take the necessary steps in order for the board to feel comfortable granting a variance so that the applicant can have the use of his very attractive addition to them to their property. Evan Sakofsky I mean, I'm guessing this is not really a question for tonight, but I'm going to throw out their way. I think I would want to get some clarity just on what exactly in terms of the storm water that's being sort of suggested. Not full capture, but what does that exactly mean,in terms of what would be acceptable?That might not, you know, make the project financially untenable for the homeowner either. -42- Transcribed by https://otter.ai Don Moscato Fine, maybe we could make some headway there. Mickey,would this be the purview of Mike or would you be willing to make suggestions? Michael Izzo Well, they're looking for an 885 foot variance. So,perhaps that's the jumping off point. Don Moscato Would the applicant or the architect, contact Mike or you for further discussion? Michael Izzo He might want to talk to Mr. Nowak about his options with regard to stormwater management and, you know,iron out details. As far as square footage is concerned, I think that would be advisable. Don Moscato Okay. And is it feasible to do by the May meeting? Michael Izzo I think it is. You know, Mike's in the office,you can call him tomorrow and get the ball rolling, if that's the way you want to go. Drew Gamils And the applicant can come forward with, you know, an idea for the plan and some proposals, but the board has in the past also conditioned approval resolutions, subject to a stormwater management plan approved by Michal Nowak. So,you know, ultimately, you can condition the resolution that the plan will be approved by Michal Nowak,if the plan is not formally prepared by May. Don Moscato Okay, that's that sounds good. Joel Simon I'd like to see the plan presented to the Board prior to any conditional approval though. I think this is one of those where we'd like to,we'd like to see it first. or know what it is first. -43- Transcribed by https://otter.ai Don Moscato Okay, Drew, do we have a motion to adjourn for the main meeting?Is that,is that the way to go on this Drew Gamils Yes, adjourned to the May meeting. I would also say continue the public hearing. Don Moscato Okay,very good. So, I'm going to make that motion. Steve Berger So moved. Don Moscato Okay. Glenn Brettschneider Seconded. Don Moscato Okay, so we'll adjourn the meeting and keep the public hearing open. I thank you very much for the presentation. And good luck in terms of coming up with an alternative plan. Thank you very much. Evan Sakofsky Thank you. #21-006 1.5. Matthew Wiener& Erica Wiener 18 Boxwood Place Construct front and rear 2nd story additions. Don Moscato Our next application is Matthew Wiener& Erica Wiener, 18 Boxwood Place construct front and rear second story additions.Who is going to be making a presentation of this application? Steve Marchesani That'll be me, Steve Marchesani, I'm the architect for the Wiener's. -44- Transcribed by https://otter.ai Don Moscato Okay,welcome back to the Rye Brook Zoning Board. Steve Marchesani Thank you. Let me share screen here. Can you see the photo? Don Moscato Yes,we can. Steve Marchesani Okay, so this is the existing house. What we're proposing is a second story addition over the garage here to accommodate a new bedroom and bath. And then in the rear of the house,we're proposing a second floor addition here of seven feet off of this existing house. For the master bedroom for a closet,walk in closet enlarging the bathroom,which are very small right now. These are the homes across the street. Kind of similar houses. This is the house to the right. And house to the left kind of screened well from that side. Wait a minute. Go back here. Okay, so this is the existing house as it stands now. This is on the second floor of the existing bathroom.And there's really no closets, is two little closets in the front here. So that's where we're proposing to go out to increase that. The added bedroom bath would be over the existing garage right here,which would be accessed from the first floor with a new set of stairs here. Because I can't see it. So, here's the proposed plans. Off of the first floor here,we're going to reconfigure with the laundry and a set of stairs up to a second bedroom with a bath. And then on the second floor for the master, really increase the master bath, and then walk in closet to make the little more livable for the bedroom. The, this proposal requires a variance for the maximum allowable gross floor area, which is 3,307.9 square feet,we need a variance of 324.1 square feet, which is a 9.8%variance. As I said, the master bedroom, there's like no closets and the bathrooms very small. So that's why we proposed to add that. And then as far as the added bedroom and bath. That was, that was, came about because of a need for the Wiener to have their parents over as they're getting older and need some assistance or looking for a place for them to have a separate area for themselves. The second floor addition that juts out is approximately 107 square feet,which that alone would meet the FAR area. So, the addition of the bedroom puts us over at the 324 square feet. And that fits over the existing footprint of the garage. And we feel like that doing it this way we minimize any effects on the character of the neighborhood in its environment. And we feel that it fits in with the neighborhood. If you have any questions,we'll see if we can answer them. Don Moscato Stephen, are you cantilevering that on the second floor bump out is that cantilevered out? Or is there something underneath that? -45- Transcribed by https://otter.ai Steve Marchesani No,it's open underneath. There's a support column in the existing wall below. It's not cantilevered. But it's open underneath. Don Moscato Okay. Thank you. Michael Izzo You have an elevation drawing that Steve,you can bring up,I think it's on page A-2. Steve Marchesani So, this is the proposed addition over the garage. Now if you notice in the picture, the existing garage has a 12 foot wall,which we cut down to eight to accommodate the second floor addition. Look at from the side, this is the addition right here. And it's also set back from the existing footprint. So,it's not, it doesn't line up exactly with the footprints a little less than the footprint. And on the rear, this would be the addition on the rear supported with two columns here and juts out seven feet this way here from the side. Don Moscato Okay, so it's going to be a seven foot extend, extension on that side. Steve Marchesani On the back. Yes. Don Moscato Good. Thank you for that clarification. Okay, any board members have a question of the architect. Steve Berger I have nothing. Joel Simon Nothing from me. Don Moscato Jaime, Glenn? -46- Transcribed by https://otter.ai Jamie Schutzer Nope. Glenn Brettschneider Very thorough. Don Moscato Okay. You know, the square footage is slightly over the R-15.And as a result, it is a relatively small lot. And the variances 9.8% which sort of is below the 10%. So, my question would be, do you guys consider this to be a substantial variance? Joel Simon I do. Don Moscato What is that somebody wants to get in? Joel Simon It was Jamie, that was Jamie beeping in. Jamie Schutzer My brand new computer. So, I was never going to get kicked out of a zoom again, decided to do its updates about 15 minutes ago, and I've been on my phone. Don Moscato Now I can imagine that, that happened to me, it's shut my audio off automatically. So, I don't know,what was. the is this? Steve,would you say that,is this the smallest possible variance that would meet the applicants need?And if it is not?Where would you seek a reduction? If any, at all? Steve Marchesani Well, I don't know that we really could I mean,we're kind of at the smallest we can go for the bedroom to include a bath and closet. Don Moscato Because that would be the, obviously the logical place would be that bump out. And I just want to make sure that any reduction will not take away from the functionality that you're trying to achieve. -47- Transcribed by https://otter.ai Steve Marchesani Right. Oh,yeah, on the rear one. Because the existing bedroom, right now has two little closets that are like, on the other side of the window. I can show you that plan again if I can find it. Well, this is the finished one. But these two closets are the only two closets in a room. And the existing bathrooms just in this little area here. So, to make it workable for a master bedroom, needs to get much more closet and a better bathroom to make it work. Don Moscato And what are the square footage of that particular area? In and of itself? Steve Marchesani 107 square feet is what we're adding. Don Moscato Okay, so your total square footage is 324. And that would be about 1/3 of the of the total request. Is that correct? Steve Marchesani Well actually the total request is 324 square feet,which is basically what this bedroom and bath is. We had a little leeway of about 100 feet. The existing house was 100 feet under that 3300. Don Moscato Okay, okay. Gotcha. All right. Jamie Schutzer Don, I may miss this before because I was on my phone. The bump out on the second floor. Right? What what's going to be underneath? Is there just does that just empty space? Steve Marchesani Yeah, that's going to be, that's just open with, yeah, it's open underneath. We have two windows in the, I think it was the living room over there. Don Moscato The living room? Steve Marchesani Yeah, then from the side,you can see it's seven feet out. So,it's not that far. Really. -48- Transcribed by https://otter.ai Jamie Schutzer I mean,is there any, guys,is there anything we need to be concerned about, like ever doing underneath there? Don Moscato It would require a GFA increase. Jamie Schutzer Okay. Don Moscato That would be subject to a conditioning also if we felt a little uncomfortable with that proposal. Stephen,would you,would the applicant be amenable to that? Steve Marchesani What as a condition you mean? Don Moscato Yes. I mean,it's a redundant condition, but. Steve Marchesani Yeah, as I said,we'd have to come back anyway. But I would say we are okay with that. Don Moscato Okay. Would the board members feel comfortable putting that condition on also? Jamie Schutzer I'm fine with that. Don Moscato Yeah. Okay, me too. Glenn. How about you? Glenn Brettschneider Yeah, I'm fine. Don Moscato All right. All right.Joel, are you okay with that? -49- Transcribed by https:Hotter.ai Joel Simon I'm fine with that. Don Moscato Okay,very good. So, Stephen regard with,we'll condition any variance with no, no boxing in that bottom, bottom section there, even though it will require going through, but what it does is it sends a signal to a potential future owner, that there is a significant hurdle there. From the board, from the existing board. That would be the logic for one wanting to put that in there. Okay. Is there anyone who wants to speak in favor the application?Anyone want to speak against the application? Mickey, have we received any information from any of the neighbors based on the notification? Michael Izzo The building department has not. Don Moscato Okay. All right. There being none, can I have a motion to close the public hearing? seconded? Okay, public hearing is closed. Okay,we're looking at a 9.8%variance. Let me pull the resolution up here. This is 18. Okay, so as I read this, Mickey, are you aware of any water issues at Boxwood? Michael Izzo No Don, I am not. Don Moscato Okay. All right. So,we're comfortable that there is no environmental or character issues on those two factors from the board members, it's self-created, and we'll consider this a substantial variance and it's self-created. So, let me go through with the resolution unless somebody wants to comment on, before I go to the resolution, are you comfortable with the five factors? Yes, yeah. Okay. RESOLUTION WHEREAS, application has been made to the Zoning Board by Matthew Wiener & Erica Wiener (the "Applicants") for a gross floor area variance of 324.1 square feet where the maximum allowable gross floor area is 3,307.9 pursuant to Village Code § 250-20.E,in connection with the proposed front and rear second story additions, on property located at 18 Boxwood Place, in an R-15 zoning district on the east side of Boxwood Place, approximately 100 feet from the - 50- Transcribed by https://otter.ai intersection of Lawridge Drive and Boxwood Place. Said premises being known and designated on the tax map of the Village of Rye Brook as Parcel ID# 129.67-1-20; and WHEREAS, a duly advertised public hearing was held April 6, 2021, at which time all those wishing to be heard were given such opportunity; and WHEREAS, the public hearing was closed on April 6, 2021; and WHEREAS, the proposed action is a Type II action pursuant to the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act and accordingly, no further environmental review is required; and WHEREAS, the Board, from the application, after viewing the premises and neighborhood concerned, and upon considering each of the factors set forth in Village Code § 250-13(G)(b)[2][a]- [e] of the Rye Brook Code, finds: 1) The variance WILL NOT create an adverse impact to the character of the neighborhood; 2) The benefit the Applicants seek CANNOT be achieved through another method, feasible for the Applicants to pursue, that does not require the variance; 3) The variance IS substantial; 4) The variance WILL NOT create any adverse impacts to the physical or environmental conditions of the neighborhood; and 5) The need for the variance IS self-created. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the said application for a gross floor area variance of 324.1 square feet where the maximum allowable gross floor area is 3,307.9 pursuant to Village Code § 250-20.E, in connection with the proposed front and rear second story additions, on property located at 18 Boxwood Place, is hereby GRANTED on the following conditions: - 51 - Transcribed by https://otter.ai 1) No permit or certificate of occupancy shall be issued until the Applicants have paid in full all application and consultant fees incurred by the Village in connection with the review of this application. Don Moscato And secondly, Drew you want to give us that condition. Drew Gamils 2) The area located under the seven-foot portion of the second-story addition in the rear of shall remain open and unenclosed. Don Moscato Okay, are we all comfortable with that board?Yes. Okay, good. Let's vote Stephen. Steve Berger Yes. Don Moscato Glenn? Glenn Brettschneider Yes. Don Moscato Jamie? Jamie Schutzer Yes. Don Moscato Joel? Joel Simon Yes. Don Moscato - 52- Transcribed by https:Hotter.ai Don, Don Yes. Application approved five years to zero nays. Congratulations. And thank you for the presentation. Steve Marchesani Thank you very much. Don Moscato Let me, let me ask my colleagues now. It is approaching 10 o'clock. Can I get a sense of two things, your stamina? And secondly, do you want to continue with the remaining applications at this particular point in time? Let the record note that David had to leave in order, as he indicated earlier, can I Steve, are you comfortable? Steve Berger I'm comfortable going for a while. Don Moscato Okay.Joel, how about you? Joel Simon Past my bedtime, but I'll go for a bit. Don Moscato Okay, Glenn? Glenn Brettschneider Never felt better. Don Moscato Okay. And,Joel, how about you? Joel Simon You asked me already. I'm good. Jamie Schutzer You asked Joel. Don Moscato Jamie? - 53- Transcribed by https:Hotter.ai Jamie Schutzer I'm fine with it. But when you say go a little bit,I mean, are we talking about just, just to be fair, because we have two more items. So, to be fair to the last one. I mean, and this next one looks like you know, there's going to be some work to do on it. I mean, do we want to have like a cut off in terms of this will be the last one, or were we going to try to plow through it. I just want to be fair. #21-004 1.6. Joseph Sullivan& Tracey Sullivan 82 Tamarack Road Legalize the one-story detached garage constructed under Building Permit #698 dated 3/22/1954. Don Moscato Well,we're looking at a deck coverage ratio of 0.14%variance, there is substantial documentation prepared by attorney Palmer.And I commend him for the thoroughness of the application,which is normal experience coming from Cuddy&Feder. So, from our past experience, I think we all can concur. What I would recommend, okay, and because the documentation was so thorough, and in my opinion,in my opinion, the deck coverage issue is de minimis. And I would be willing to skip over that whole discussion. Once I go through the factors and indicate that I don't think it's a problem with any of the factors, considering it has been there. With respect to the C of O, for the detached garage. I also, and the side yard setback associated with that, given that it is been there for quite some time. And I don't think we have any concerns from the neighbors. I would be willing to entertain an expeditious resolution of these two. These two variances,if the board concurs. How do we feel about that, Steve? Steve Berger I'm okay. I mean, I would like to see what you get through it because there are people at the end who have been waiting all night. I hate to see them have to wait another month, so I'd be inclined to try to plow through it. Don Moscato Okay, are you comfortable with the expeditious nature that I propose? Yes,yes, I am.Joel, how about you? Joel Simon I'm thrilled with the suggestions. I think it's the first time ever heard of an expeditious method from you, Don, and I'm happy to hear it. - 54- Transcribed by https://otter.ai Don Moscato No, I mean, I read through all of these. Joel Simon I'm kidding. I Jamie Schutzer He's teasing you, Don. Joel Simon I agree with everything you said. Don Moscato Okay,very good, Glenn. Glenn Brettschneider I'm fine with that. I'm actually glad I read the, all the documentation. And I think it's a great idea. Don Moscato Okay, and the party pooper Jamie,what do you think? Jamie Schutzer I'm all for it. I was hoping Taylor was going to read all his letters. But,you know,we could skip that. Don Moscato You know, I appreciate the section that discusses what our responsibilities are. And I want to set the record straight, that I am not skirting those responsibilities. I am just indicating that the presentation was so thorough and so clear, that in my mind,I think that the folks are trying to sell their house. And they're doing it the right way by tidying up things, and I think we should just expedite this. Now Drew, I am going to need one piece of advice from you. And that is, I would prefer not to have to read the entire resolution. I will recognize there are two resolutions. And what I'd like to do is identify the resolution, number one, and then go directly to the five factors and then go to the vote and then go to the second one. Is that, are you comfortable with that? Drew Gamils Yes, as long as we discussed the factors, that is the most important part,you do not need to read the resolution just mentioned what the variance is for. - 55- Transcribed by https://otter.ai Don Moscato Okay, that's what I was going to do. Okay. Very good. Taylor Palmer If I may, Mr. Chairman, just and I'm sorry to interrupt. I appreciate all that being said. But we would ask that the hearing be open and... Drew Gamils Oh, N-es. Taylor Palmer Making sure we open the hearing for any other comments in addition to the letters of support and for the record,Taylor Palmer with Cuddy& Feder, thank you. Drew Gamils That was going be the next thing Don was going say. Glenn Brettschneider What's the thing around Taylor's neck? Taylor Palmer Extension of my beard? Glenn Brettschneider I remember those. Okay. Don Moscato It's been a long time. Right, Glenn?Yeah. Okay. Is there?This is in reference to the application, which I did. I think I did read it, didn't I? I think,I think I read it. Drew Gamils Read it again Don. Don Moscato Yeah, it's at 82 Tamarack and it's this one that I'm dealing with here. I'm not going to read the resolution. I'm going to ask if anybody wants to speak in favor of this application. Anyone want to - 56- Transcribed by https://otter.ai speak against this application? This is for the deck coverage ratio. And the two side yard setback variance of 1.5 feet. Now, Mickey, do we have any letters in support of this? Michael Izzo We do Don,we have a plethora of letters from all the concerned neighbors. I think there's seven. Taylor am I correct? Taylor Palmer Yes. We have six letters of support from Michael Izzo Six. Taylor Palmer Yep. Neighbors in the in the area. Michael Izzo Yes,we do all neighbors around 75 Tamarack, 78 Tamarack, 79 Tamarack, 80 Tamarack, 81 Tamarack and 84 Tamarack. Steve Berger And no one against is that correct? Michael Izzo All in support?Yes. Glenn Brettschneider They really want them to move out. Don Moscato Thank you for that comment. We'd never know would we. Okay,let me go ahead and identify I mentioned the two particular items and this one is Parcel ID 135.52-3-9.And it has a non- conforming deck coverage of 3.597%. The proposed deck will result in a deck coverage of 3.64%. We had opened the public hearing and I should say, can I have a motion to close the public hearing? So, move. Second, second. public hearing is closed. Okay. Let me go through the quickly the five factors. I don't think we're going to affect the character or the environmental conditions of the neighborhood. So eloquently stated by counsel for the applicant. Would you consider the - 57- Transcribed by https://otter.ai variances to be substantial? 0.14%. And the other one is a 1.4 foot variance over a base five. So,I guess that one would be considered substantial. Glenn Brettschneider Yeah. Yeah, on a percentage basis. Yes. Don Moscato Yeah. Okay. And there's not a way to meet the applicant's needs other than the proposed variances and the need for the variances are self-created. Are we comfortable with those five factors in this resolution? Yes,yes. Okay. All right.Let me then read those five factors. Formally. The variances will not create an adverse impact to the character of the neighborhood. The benefit the applicant sees cannot be achieved through another method feasible for the applicants to pursue that does not require the variances, the variances are collectively substantial. The variances will not create any adverse impacts to the physical or environmental conditions of the neighborhood.And five, the need for the variance is self-created. Now, therefore, be it resolved that what I just said before is appropriate, and is provisionally granted subject to the later vote, no permit, a certificate of occupancy shall be issued until the applicants have paid in full. All application and consultant fees incurred by the village in connection with the review of this application. I'm assuming we're not going to condition any of these. With any additional conditions, am I comfortable in assuming that, yes? Okay. Let's have a vote then. Steve? Steve Berger Yes. Don Moscato Glenn? Glenn Brettschneider Yes. Don Moscato Jamie? Jamie Schutzer Yes. Don Moscato Joel? - 58- Transcribed by https://otter.ai Joel Simon Yes. Don Moscato Don?Yes. Okay, application for the variances approved five years is zero nays. Okay,very good. You see what good planning does gentlemen. Good plan works all the time. RESOLUTION WHEREAS, application has been made to the Zoning Board by Joseph Sullivan &Tracey Sullivan (the "Applicants")for(1) deck coverage variance of 0.14 %where the maximum allowable deck coverage is 3.5%pursuant to Village Code § 250-37.B, and(2)a total of two side yards setback variance of 1.5 feet where the minimum required total of two side yards setback is 20 feet pursuant to Village Code § 250-23.G(2)(b), in connection with the proposed legalization of the rear deck and screen porch, on property located at 82 Tamarack Road,in an R-7 zoning district on the west side of Tamarack Road, approximately 150 feet from the intersection of Argyle Road and Tamarack Road. Said premises being known and designated on the tax map of the Village of Rye Brook as Parcel ID# 135.52-3-9; and Whereas,the property has an existing non-conforming deck coverage of 3.597% and the proposed deck repairs will result in a deck coverage of 3.64%; and WHEREAS, a duly advertised public hearing was held April 6, 2021, at which time all those wishing to be heard were given such opportunity; and WHEREAS,the public hearing was closed on April 6, 2021; and WHEREAS,the proposed action is a Type II action pursuant to the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act and accordingly,no further environmental review is required; and WHEREAS, the Board, from the application, after viewing the premises and neighborhood concerned, and upon considering each of the factors set forth Village Code § 250-13(G)(b)[2][a]-[e] of the Rye Brook Code, finds: - 59- Transcribed by https://otter.ai 1) The variances WILL NOT create an adverse impact to the character of the neighborhood; 2) The benefit the Applicants seek CANNOT be achieved through another method, feasible for the Applicants to pursue,that does not require the variances; 3) The variances ARE substantial; 4) The variances WILL NOT create any adverse impacts to the physical or environmental conditions of the neighborhood; and 5) The need for the variances IS self-created. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the said application for (1) deck coverage variance of 0.14%where the maximum allowable deck coverage is 3.5%pursuant to Village Code § 250- 37.13, and (2) a total of two side yards setback variance of 1.5 feet where the minimum required total of two side yards setback is 20 feet pursuant to Village Code § 250-23.G(2)(b), in connection with the proposed legalization of the rear deck and screen porch, on property located at 82 Tamarack Road, is hereby GRANTED on the following conditions: 1) No permit or certificate of occupancy shall be issued until the Applicants have paid in full all application and consultant fees incurred by the Village in connection with the review of this application. #21-021 1.7. Joseph Sullivan &Tracey Sullivan 82 Tamarack Road Legalize rear deck and screen porch. Don Moscato Okay, now we have another one sitting out there. Let me just okay. This one is for the second variance, same property Parcel ID 135.52-3-9 opening the public hearing. This is for the legalization of the one story detached garage, constructed under building permit number 698 dated March 22, 1954, property located at 82 Tamarack Road and an R-7 zoning district. And this particular application I presume,Mickey those same people are consenting to both of these. Resolution. - 60- Transcribed by https://otter.ai Michael Izzo Yes. Don. There. There are two overlapping issues one with a deck and then a sunroom that was built underneath the deck. Don Moscato Right. Right. Okay,good. And board members? Well,not board members, anyone online who wants to speak in favor in addition to those received requests? Speak in favor or against the application? Okay, motion to close the public hearing. Moved. Seconded. Okay,public hearing is closed. Once again, I thank counsel for the very thorough work done on this application allowing us to take unprecedented action and moving forward on this type of an application at this at this state. Drew Gamils Don't say unprecedented Don,just expedited a little bit. Don Moscato Okay, I like that. Thank you for what the heck just happened to my darn screen here. Drew Gamils We can hear you pretty good, though. Don Moscato Okay, it's connecting again evidently it kicked me out. I guess you must have hit the button to get me out of there. Okay, back on. Okay, let me go through the five factors, then. It seems like once again, it is close to the property line, but you know,it has been there and the C of O wants to be closed out so that they can sell the property,it will not create an adverse impact to the character and it will not create any adverse environmental concerns. The variance is self-created and is substantial. And it is the smallest possible variance short of chopping the thing down. So, are we comfortable with that my interpretation of those five factors? Yes. Okay,let me go ahead and read the resolution. Once again,Parcel ID 135.52-3-9. The public hearing was opened on the sixth of April 2021. Closed, same day is a type two action, no further review is necessary. And following the five factors, the variance will not create an adverse impact to the character of the neighborhood to the benefit the applicant seeks cannot be achieved to another method feasible for the applicants to pursue that does not require the variance. Variances is substantial. The variance will not create an adverse impact to the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood. And the need for the variance is self-created. Now, therefore, be it resolved, that the resolution is provisionally granted subject to no permit or certificate of occupancy shall be issued until the applicants have paid in full. All application and consultant fees incurred by the Village in connection with the review of this application. Okay, are we comfortable with that? Ready to vote?Yes. Okay, Steve? - 61 - Transcribed by https://otter.ai Steve Berger Yes. Don Moscato Glenn? Glenn Brettschneider Yes. Don Moscato Jamie? Jamie Schutzer Yes. Don Moscato Joel? Joel Simon Yes. Don Moscato Don?Yes. Application approved five yeses, zero nay. Congratulations. And thank you very much for that. Excellent and complete presentation. RESOLUTION WHEREAS, application has been made to the Zoning Board by Joseph Sullivan &Tracey Sullivan (the "Applicants")for(1) deck coverage variance of 0.14 %where the maximum allowable deck coverage is 3.5%pursuant to Village Code § 250-37.B, and(2)a total of two side yards setback variance of 1.5 feet where the minimum required total of two side yards setback is 20 feet pursuant to Village Code § 250-23.G(2)(b), in connection with the proposed legalization of the rear deck and screen porch, on property located at 82 Tamarack Road,in an R-7 zoning district on the west side of Tamarack Road, approximately 150 feet from the intersection of Argyle Road and Tamarack Road. Said premises being known and designated on the tax map of the Village of Rye Brook as Parcel ID# 135.52-3-9; and Whereas,the property has an existing non-conforming deck coverage of 3.597% and the proposed deck repairs will result in a deck coverage of 3.64%; and - 62- Transcribed by https://otter.ai WHEREAS, a duly advertised public hearing was held April 6, 2021, at which time all those wishing to be heard were given such opportunity; and WHEREAS,the public hearing was closed on April 6, 2021; and WHEREAS,the proposed action is a Type II action pursuant to the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act and accordingly,no further environmental review is required; and WHEREAS, the Board, from the application, after viewing the premises and neighborhood concerned, and upon considering each of the factors set forth Village Code § 250-13(G)(b)[2][a]-[e] of the Rye Brook Code, finds: 1) The variances WILL NOT create an adverse impact to the character of the neighborhood; 2) The benefit the Applicants seek CANNOT be achieved through another method, feasible for the Applicants to pursue,that does not require the variances; 3) The variances ARE substantial; 4) The variances WILL NOT create any adverse impacts to the physical or environmental conditions of the neighborhood; and 5) The need for the variances IS self-created. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the said application for (1) deck coverage variance of 0.14%where the maximum allowable deck coverage is 3.5%pursuant to Village Code § 250- 37.13, and (2) a total of two side yards setback variance of 1.5 feet where the minimum required total of two side yards setback is 20 feet pursuant to Village Code § 250-23.G(2)(b), in connection with the proposed legalization of the rear deck and screen porch, on property located at 82 Tamarack Road, is hereby GRANTED on the following conditions: 3) No permit or certificate of occupancy shall be issued until the Applicants have paid in full all application and consultant fees incurred by the Village in connection with the review of this application. - 63- Transcribed by https://otter.ai Taylor Palmer Thank you very much. We like to thank the Village professionals as well,Ms. Gamils and Mr. Izzo for their help putting these things together and coordinating that. So,we appreciate all of your time and your time this evening. Say safe everybody. Don Moscato Thank you very much. Drew Gamils Thank you. 1.8. #21-001 Robert Wilk& Haley Wilk 16 Birch Lane Construct an in-ground swimming pool with pool patio,pool equipment, pool fence and wood deck. Don Moscato Okay, the next application is item number 21-001. Robert Wilk Haley Wilk 16 Birch Lane, construct an inground swimming pool,with pool patio,pool equipment,pool fencing and wood deck. Okay. Is this going to be Chris making the presentation? Daniel Sherman No, Dan Sherman. Don Moscato Okay, Dan Sherman. Okay, fire away. Daniel Sherman Well, thanks for persisting. It's a long evening, but you guys are moving right along. So, Dan Sherman here for Robert and Haley Wilk at 16 Birch Lane. And we received a notice of disapproval from Mike Izzo, dated February 25, citing that we needed three variances for the pool on this property. So, if I can share my screen, I can show you the survey first. Then I have the site plan. And then I made an exhibit that shows other pools in the neighborhood. Oops, I have to move you over here. So here is the survey. And you'll see why the first and third are. Glenn Brettschneider I'm not seeing a survey, but I'm seeing a really nice pool. - 64- Transcribed by https://otter.ai Daniel Sherman That was my cottage, that was the lake. Oh, so this is the property on the end of the cul de sac of Birch Lane, and it backs up against the cul de sac of Red Roof Drive. So that's why it has two front yards. So, the first variance, first notice of disapproval is that no pool, or associated structures of equipment shall be located in any front yard. So,we're requesting that we are permitted to put a pool on this lot in what really is the rear yard. We're not putting it in the front yard where it's addresses on birch lane but treating the Red Roof back as the rear yard. And the third one is similar. It's about the 35% coverage in a front yard. And we're asking if this be treated as a rear yard. So that's the first and second first and third. The second one is a lot coverage thing and we're a little over on the lot coverage. It's a large lot it's 21,850 square feet. And there's a lot of open lawn but it's still when we use the formula,we come out 1000 square feet over the lot coverage. And so, I'll show you the site plan so you can see how it looks. Here is the site plan. This always happens to me; I turn the drawing blue. Anyway. So, you can see this the drive existing driveway existing front walk existing house, there's a deck and a patio, there isn't anything I can really take away from that. We put a moderate sized pool. I think it's 33 by 16 it's not labeled on this. I believe it's on my drawing. But this is the drawing from the engineer. And I just have a pool, a deck that's 12 feet deep to put some chairs but we didn't put any other additional deck and this does meet the rear yard requirement if it was treated as a rear yard and the filter also meets the 15 foot rear yard if it would be treated as a rear yard. I made an exhibit, one last thing to show you and then I'll take questions. I made this exhibit looking up the different lots around. We looked at all the properties on that same loop that have pools. And our lot is the largest of this. The Wilk's lot is the largest of all the ones with pools and so I made this little exhibit here, they're number 16. And there it's 7.2% over the allowable. This is the total lot coverage, not the impermeable surface. The one next door is 11% 11.6 over number 12 Birch Lane is 7.3 over number 4 Birch Lane is right on, it's exactly right. And number five is 6.1 over so and then over on Red Roof, number 20 Red Roof Drive is 5.2 over and 22 of the lot was smaller, that's under actually. But it sort of shows in our mind precedent that of the in this neighborhood,the lots with the pools,we have the larger lot of all of these, and we aren't really any more than the 11, or the seven or the eight. So, the five, I mean, so we feel that,you know,it's not going to crowd the lot,it just happens to be technically over on the lot coverage. And that's really the main requests for variance we're requesting. So, anything else I can add to explain it? Don Moscato No,you have opted, by the way that I take exception to one comment you made in your application. And that was that when a person purchases their property one of the realizations of living in Rye Brook is that you have, when you're a corner property,you have two front yards. And that is not, you just can't say it's really a rear yard, you have to recognize the statute and the bulk standard and then go from there. In other words,you just can't say,it's a rear, it's really a rear lot. - 65- Transcribed by https://otter.ai It's a two front yard lot. And when the founding fathers and mothers created the bulk standards, they deliberately made that the case. So that means anyone who lives in a corner lot must live by that bulk standard. They can request relief in terms of a zoning relief, but they must recognize that they do have front yards and there are requirements for those two front yards. So, I'm saying that in a pleasant way, not in an adversarial way. Daniel Sherman A variance request would be that we'd be asking to put place a pool in a front yard not that we treat it as a rear yard. Don Moscato Right, that's all I'm saying, that's how we're going to look at it, that it's a front yard. And we are trying to balance the factors against that realization, because you're not the first person in a corner lot that's come before this. And oftentimes, the argument is always the same. Why am I so handcuffed by this bulk standard?And the fact is, there are certain advantages to a corner lot. But one of the disadvantages in Rye Brook is that you've got two front yards. And as a result, that limits you to some extent of what you can do. Now, the Planning Board,you went before the Planning Board, they referred this to the zoning board. And in their referral, they indicated that, I want to,I don't have it in front of me, but I could scroll down and find it but they indicate, it's on page 389 of the of the packet. So let me just scroll to it. I want to get the exact wording of it. And they have a different responsibility than we do. And we recognize that difference and we applaud that difference.They do say though, at the bottom of the of the resolution, let me see if I can refer to it. Oh yeah, consideration should be given to the fact that two of the variances result from the classification of front yard. Practically speaking the proposed pool is in the rear of the home at 16 Birch Lane, appears to be vegetatively screened from view from Red Roof. And second consideration should be given to whether the size and scope of the pool and pool patio and walkways can be reduced to reduce or eliminate the impervious surface coverage variances. So, to my fellow board members that that appears to be the issue. I'm not, I don't have a problem with it being a front yard slash rear yard interpretation. My question is, are we comfortable with the size of the pool, and the other changes being made surrounding that pool with respect to the stone patio and the wood deck stairs?The other thing I would raise is that that impervious coverage is quite large at 22% of a variance. And I know that my first blush reaction was,wow,that's awfully large a request.And so that's where I'm coming from. And I just want to get that out of there to see how my colleagues feel about that. In terms of the size of the impervious coverage. Steve Berger If I may, I'd like to ask Mickey,what's the water situation in this location? - 66- Transcribed by https://otter.ai Michael Izzo Well, historically speaking, the development at Red Roof caused a myriad of water problems, stormwater problems. It was constructed and mostly completed before I started my tenure at the Village.But I was, I was involved in the results of the lack of planning for this development. So much so that during one rainstorm,it actually flooded the then mayor's house, to the extent that it knocked his air conditioning units off their mounts, and they wind up in the neighbor's yard down downstream, I suppose you could say, but there has been significant improvement in the drainage over the years. And in the recent drainage upgrade on Ridge Street undertaken by the County of Westchester. Much of that has been ameliorated. But the Red Roof area is traditionally a drainage issue. But it is before the Planning Board. The Planning Board is dealing with the drainage and the impervious issues as far as that goes. I'm not sure to what extent they're able to mitigate this. I have not reviewed the tapes from the Planning meetings. But that's the story of the Red Roof development. Steve Berger And that was my understanding that red roof was a problem area regarding drainage. I, I don't have an issue, and I'm going with what Don was saying as to the back lot front lot, but concerns. My concern is the amount of the impervious and whether or not other neighbors have large impervious areas. I don't know what they've done regarding drainage. I would, I would think that here, given the amount of impervious we're talking about the size of the lot, they would need to be some sort of remediation in place to ensure that we're not creating or adding to a problem. Daniel Sherman This is a drainage plan that Chris Utschig prepared. It shows three cultic chambers and he has review this with Mike Izzo. And it will go back to the Planning Board still and then through engineering. Don Moscato How far did the Planning Board go in reviewing the drainage issues before they kicked it over to us? At zoning? How far was that discussion? Daniel Sherman Well, I know Mike Izzo and Chris talked privately about it or in the office and so the board was comfortable that Mike Izzo was working with Chris on that. But I know that Mike and Chris have a good relationship of making sure the solution works out. So, Chris is doing this. - 67- Transcribed by https://otter.ai Michael Izzo I think Chris has been in contact with my colleague, Mike Nowak. Yeah, he's the engineer and he's the one, he's the key player here, as far as designing a code compliant and feasible drainage system, I'm not part of that discussion. Daniel Sherman Oh, that's right. Wrong Mike Sorry about that.And the pool is 16 by 32, I had to open my other drawing, because it's not labeled here. But that's a pretty, relatively small moderate pool of 16 by 32. Steve Berger Nothing else in terms of the deck area or other areas that can be reduced or eliminated to decrease the impervious? Daniel Sherman Well,we've gone over it several times,when I consider the idea of making the patio be squares of stone with grass joints. I didn't really discuss that with the Wilks but that would reduce it a little bit. But there's only just a walking space on the left and right and nothing on the south side. So, it's just a, and you have. Steve Berger Nothing else on the property. Daniel Sherman No, I mean, I looked at the driveway ends up in this sort of tight Hammerhead, and nothing else there on the, I didn't find anything,I mean we had. Steve Berger My main concern is the drainage. Daniel Sherman This is the results of two or three reductions already? Steve Berger If the drainage issue has been handled by the Planning Board. I'm less concerned than if it wasn't. Daniel Sherman Well,it is yes. - 68- Transcribed by https://otter.ai Steve Berger Yeah, no, I hear you. Don Moscato Steve their lot size is 21,857 square feet. So, it's an R-15 zone, and it's well above the limitation of 15,000 square feet. So, they do have space. You know, they do have, they do have a space,it's just that it's the impervious coverage is taken up quite a bit, and the front yard impervious coverage, you know, I'm willing to forgive the front yard aspect of things. It's the second variance that is causing me some concern. Steve Berger Don,let me ask you question and excuse my ignorance, the purpose of the impervious coverage. Or,you know, the conservative on the impervious coverage is drainage, correct? Don Moscato And no, not necessarily, because in this particular case, maybe less so. But you can have somebody, and we've had applications, where their entire backyard was essentially paved over with impervious coverage. And, you know,it sort of looks like in New York City, you know, apartments rather than the green scape that we have in Rye Brook. So,it's not always just the water,it's sometimes it's the visual impact of having,you know, no green space in your backyard, but it's totally covered. Steve Berger No, I hear you and I'm going to play devil's advocate just for a second. And I'm going take the position that if we're dealing with two issues as to impervious one is the aesthetics,which I don't think in this backyard,given the size is really an issue. And the second is drainage,which if that's being handled by Planning Board, then supposedly that's not going to be an issue. If those two things are handled like that. I then don't see. I'm saying I don't know if there really is a concern. This is an area where it's an aesthetic issue. Don Moscato No, I see. I see where you're coming from and I concur. I concur with the aesthetic part of it. And that's that partially can be mitigated by the vegetation on the Red Roof side, shielding it and I think that was that was commented on in the in the proposal that I remember reading that there's quite a bit of vegetation cover, shielding that Red Roof side the pool from the streetscape. - 69- Transcribed by https://otter.ai Daniel Sherman And Red Roof, excuse me,is also like six feet down. So,if you drive the loop around Red Roof Drive, you can't see up into this yard, not only through all the Evergreen vegetation, but that the lawn is six feet higher. So, you can't see up into it. Don Moscato Yeah,if I'm not mistaken,we had that issue. It may have been on Old Orchard I'm not sure Mickey but remember a while ago, somebody wanted something that was elevated, and I know the board wrestled with that. The Planning Board though did issue the issue of did make a point of pool patio and walkways can be reduced the scope of the pool and the patio being reduced. So that is under our purview if we feel uncomfortable about that, but that's an individual board member decision that each person would have to would have to wrestle with. So, but I take your,your comments, and,you know, I believe there well taken. I do. Mickey, there was a concern and a letter that was received. But that seems to be a construction management issue. Can you just comment on that for the record to make sure we touch on all the bases on this? Michael Izzo Sure thing,Mr. Chairman, I received a letter today from Mr. Haskell at 22 Red Roof Drive. And he raised concerns about just what you said, the construction management aspect of the job. And, obviously, that's nothing that the applicant's representative can speak on because he's not going to be involved in the construction of the, you know, the actual day to day construction operations, it's going to be that of the contractor. So, his issues are around the construction management. And I'll quote the last sentence from Mr. Haskell, he starts I appreciate you addressing this question. And my concern is during the meeting, that's the Planning Board meeting, assuming the owners are adequate and appropriate and appropriately addressing all these concerns,which are all construction management concerns. I have no issue with the general application for a pool. Don Moscato Okay, thanks. Thank you. Mr. Sherman. Were you aware of that letter? Daniel Sherman No, I had not known of that. Don Moscato Oh, okay. All right, fine. So - 70- Transcribed by https://otter.ai Daniel Sherman I got a call from one neighbor. But they just didn't know,we had sent the notices by registered by certified mail like we have to do in Scarsdale. And he was concerned why he got a certified letter. And when I said it was for a pool, he said, Oh, okay. He just wasn't sure why you got a certified letter. Don Moscato Okay, good. So, the more people who expressed those concerns to the applicant regarding the sensitivity of the construction process, I think that would be that would be helpful they'd be sensitive to some concerns that were raised. Michael Izzo We could forward the letter to whoever you want. Don Moscato Let me see. Is there anyone online who wants to speak in favor of the application?Anyone want to speak against the application? Okay, anyone have a question? Additional questions of the of the architect. Okay, there being none. Can I have a motion to close the public hearing? Okay. All right, let's, this is a big application. And I just want to make sure that even though it's a late hour, I think we've moved very well up to this point. But I would like to give it the appropriate review and make sure that everybody expresses their particular perspective on this. So,let's go down the line. Now. Steve, do you want to express your position on this application? Steve Berger You know,given that, not really, I think that,you know, the stormwater management issue is the big one. And I think that we raise concern about the construction management. And I don't have a problem with the front yard issue, so I'm okay. Don Moscato Okay, Glenn?Yeah, Glenn Brettschneider I'm fine with it. I actually did want to mention for a second the letter that Mickey referenced just and I don't know really what it meant, and if it has anything to do with us,but I did note in the beginning of his letter, since we're not reading it on,you know, tonight,it does mention almost like not in my backyard that the construction would be in the construction equipment would be going from the back yard,which is really a front yard where the pool and not from the front of his house, which normally is where you would enter a property from to go to the backyard.And so,you know, - 71 - Transcribed by https://otter.ai I'm not sure that he meant anything by that. But he, as I said, Mickey said, as he did end the letter it really had to do with, he's fine. As long as all his concerned about his young kids were addressed. I just wasn't sure what he was referring to with the, you know,was he complaining that it wasn't through the front? So, but other than that, I have no problems with the application. Don Moscato Okay,Jamie? Jamie Schutzer Yeah, I agree with Steve's comments as well, as long as you know, there's things that we discussed her being addressed, and I'm okay with it. Don Moscato Okay,Joel? Joel Simon Based on what I said earlier, I think that that there is I don't think there's an aesthetic issue, as long as the drainage issues have been being handled by the Planning Board,which I think makes this one probably worth it to have as a condition that is based upon an approved drainage management plan by the Planning Board. Don Moscato Okay, let me just depart for a second Drew. Is that within our is that within our purview to be able to condition it on what Joel just said? Drew Gamils Sorry, I forgot I was on mute. Yes. Because that pertains directly to the impervious surface variance. You know, I'd want to be a little bit broad to give the Planning Board and Mike Nowak some discretion, but we can definitely write something up. And they are currently working on the plan. So,it is appropriate. Don Moscato Okay, Mr. Sherman, are you comfortable with that condition? Daniel Sherman Yes. - 72- Transcribed by https://otter.ai Don Moscato Okay. Let me chime in my two cents here. I think that Joel's point about the aesthetics, I think is appropriate. And what I think is an important factor for me is that the square footage of this lot,is 6,100 square feet over the minimum. So, they do have quite a bit of real estate, considering it's an R- 15 zone. And I don't think it adds to excessive clutter on the part of this particular project. But I do consider the variance to be substantial for the impervious coverage. But I don't think it's enough to sway me to reject the application as presented in terms of I'm not going after a reduction of impervious coverage, because I think the water management plan is going to deal with that And that that is another factor that sways me in terms of supporting the application. Okay, let me go ahead and read the resolution with the proviso that the variances are substantial, and that they're self-created. How about is this the smallest variance that can be achieved that does not require the variances? you think it is?Everyone concurs on that one. Yeah. Okay. And the water, the environmental conditions will be dealt with through the water management issue. And I don't think it will affect the character of the neighborhood,given the screening and the elevation of the of the property. So let me go ahead and read this wrote resolution. RESOLUTION WHEREAS, application has been made to the Zoning Board by Robert Wilk & Haley Wilk (the "Applicants") for (1) relief from Village Code § 224-7.13 which states that no pool or associated structures or equipment shall be located in any front yard as defined in Chapter 250, Zoning; (2) a Total Impervious Coverage variance of 1,578 square feet where the maximum allowable Total Impervious Coverage for this property is 7,005 square feet pursuant to Village Code § 250-37.C; and (3) a Front Yard Impervious Coverage variance of 4.2%where the maximum allowable Front Yard Impervious Coverage is 35% pursuant to Village Code 5 250-37.13, in connection with the proposed construction of an in-ground swimming pool and swimming pool patio in the front yard of the property at the Red Roof Drive elevation, at 16 Birch Lane, in an R-15 zoning district on the south east side of Birch Lane, approximately 600 feet from the intersection of Old Orchard Road and Birch Lane. Said premises being known and designated on the tax map of the Village of Rye Brook as Parcel ID# 135.43-1-5.28; and - 73 - Transcribed by https://otter.ai WHEREAS, a duly advertised public hearing was held April 6, 2021, at which time all those wishing to be heard were given such opportunity; and WHEREAS, the public hearing was closed on April 6, 2021; and WHEREAS, the proposed action is a Type II action pursuant to the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act and accordingly, no further environmental review is required; and WHEREAS, the Board, from the application, after viewing the premises and neighborhood concerned, and upon considering each of the factors set forth in Village Code § 250-13(G)(b)[2][a]- [e] of the Rye Brook Code, finds: 1) The variances WILL NOT create an adverse impact to the character of the neighborhood; 2) The benefit the Applicants seek CANNOT be achieved through another method, feasible for the Applicants to pursue, that does not require the variances; 3) The variances ARE substantial; 4) The variances WILL NOT create any adverse impacts to the physical or environmental conditions of the neighborhood; and 5) The need for the variances IS self-created. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the said application for (1) relief from Village Code 5 224-7.D which states that no pool or associated structures or equipment shall be located in any front yard as defined in Chapter 250,Zoning; (2) a Total Impervious Coverage variance of 1,578 square feet where the maximum allowable Total Impervious Coverage for this property is 7,005 square feet pursuant to Village Code § 250-37.C; and (3) a Front Yard Impervious Coverage variance of 4.2% where the maximum allowable Front Yard Impervious Coverage is 35% pursuant to Village Code 5 250-37.D,in connection with the proposed construction of an in-ground swimming pool and swimming pool patio in the front yard of the property at the Red Roof Drive elevation, at 16 Birch Lane, is hereby GRANTED on the following conditions: - 74 - Transcribed by https:Hotter.ai 1) No permit or certificate of occupancy shall be issued until the Applicants have paid in full all application and consultant fees incurred by the Village in connection with the review of this application. Don Moscato Secondly, Drew, can you read that please? Drew Gamils 2) The Applicant shall prepare a stormwater management plan for the project,subject to review and approval by the Village Superintendent of Public Works. Don Moscato Okay. And so all right. Okay,where are we okay with that?Yes. Okay. Let's go ahead with the vote Steve? Steve Berger Yes. Don Moscato Okay. Glenn? Glenn Brettschneider Yes. Don Moscato Jamie? Jamie Schutzer Yes. Don Moscato Joel? Joel Simon Yes. - 75- Transcribed by https:Hotter.ai Don Moscato Don?Yes. Okay. Application approved five yeses, zero nays. No abstentions. Congratulations, and good luck before the Planning Board. All right. Thank you. Okay. All right, gentlemen. And Drew, thank you very much for the perseverance maintained our attention,which is always appreciated. There being no minutes. Michael Izzo There's no minutes. Drew Gamils Tara and I are working on them. We will have March's minutes for next month, maybe April's minutes as well. But you know,we're still on the transcripts. And the transcripts are very tricky. So be patient with us. Michael Izzo We are patient Drew Gamils I appreciate it. Don Moscato Mickey,what's ahead for May? Michael Izzo I'm sorry? Don Moscato What's ahead for May? Michael Izzo May,we have at least one on that I can think of right now. Don Moscato We have a referral from tonight. Right? Michael Izzo That's correct. - 76- Transcribed by https:Hotter.ai Steve Berger Wait, did we have, did Chris Scelfo have something on tonight? Did that. Michael Izzo He was here. Don Moscato I think he was working with Sherman on this one. Steve Berger Oh, he was? Michael Izzo Possibly. Steve Berger Oh Okay. Michael Izzo He left early though. Steve Berger Okay. Michael Izzo It's past his bedtime. Steve Berger Mine to. Glenn Brettschneider On that note,I'd like to move to adjourn. Don Moscato Thank you very much. Second that motion please. Okay, the committee is adjourned. Thank you very much, everyone, everybody. - 77 - Transcribed by https:Hotter.ai �k(,_ BR(�v� Village of Rye Brook Agenda Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting C't ° Tuesday,October 5,2021 at 8:00 PM V( Vy - �h�� Village Hall,938 King Street Due to technical difficulties,the meeting will not be available for live viewing on Cable TV or the Village website.Anyone who wishes to watch the live streaming of the meeting can do so through the following link,which is for viewing purposes only: his://us02web.zoom.us/j/89070497476 Anyone interested in participating in the meeting can do so in person at Village Hall,or by submitting written comment in advance to Michael Izzo at mizzo_.1yebrook.org 1. ITEMS: 1.1. #21-026 Howard Gordon&Susan Gordon 11 Candy Lane Rebuild rear deck with new firepit and install new siding. Mail Affidavit Sign Affidavit Approvals; Adjournment Aye; Nay; 1.2. #21-028(A,#oumed from September 8,2021) Valenti Communications Corp. 111 South Ridge Street Convert office space to an art studio. Approvals; Adjournment Aye; Nay; DNI MI SB SF GB K&B JDS JS DH t �,�� (}R(1�• Village of Rye Brook O� yAgend Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting t Tuesday, October 5,2021 at 8:00 PM Village Hall,938 King Street 7. 1.3. #21-001 Robert Wilk&Haley Wilk 16 Birch Lane Request extension of approval of Zoning variance,Village Code§250-13.H. Approvals; Adjournment 01 °"TA `F4--1 00 Aye; Nay; 2. SUMMARY APPROVALS: 2.1. Approval of September 8,2021 Zoning Board Summary Approvals; Adjournment Aye; Nay; DM MI SB SF GB K&B JDS ✓ Js DH 2 APPROVED DATE�-Lnuae� 4A= BRC1�7 MINUTES v 4��C�"��'ovv �` Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting t U 4y y � OY� Village Hall,938 King Street Tuesday, October 5, 2021 D C F.I W IE ID BOARD PRESENT: Donald Moscato,Chair JAN - 5 2022 Glenn Brettschneider Imes Schumer VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK J BUILDING DEPARTMENT Joel Simon Trustee David M. Heiser,Village Board Liaison BOARD ABSENT: Steven Berger STAFF PRESENT: Drew Gamils,Village Counsel Michael Izzo, Building Inspector Fred Seifert,Public Access Coordinator Chairman Don Moscato welcomed everyone to the October 5, 2021, meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals. He introduced the members of the Board, Village staff, and the liaison from the Board of Trustees,Trustee David Heiser. He instructed anyone addressing the Board to come to the podium, use the microphone, state their name, address,and the nature of the application. Chairman Moscato noted that only four (4) of the five (5) members of the Board were in attendance. He explained that each applicant has the opportunity to adjourn to the next meeting. Chairman Moscato advised the applicants that a successful application must have at least three (3) Board members vote in favor. Chairman Moscato would like to call on the third agenda item first since it is for an approval extension. Chairman Moscato called for the third item on the agenda. 1. ITEMS: 1.3. #21-001 Robert Wilk&Haley Wilk 16 Birch Lane Request extension of approval of Zoning variance,Village Code � 250-13.H. Chris Utschig, Engineer for the project addressed the Board. Mr. Utschig explained that the property owners are having difficulty finding an in-ground pool contractor. They did speak with a contractor today and hope to secure the building permit by winter. Zoning Board of Appeals October 5,2021 The consensus of the Board was that it was reasonable and should be granted. Chairman Moscato read the following resolution: RESOLUTION WHEREAS, on April 6, 2021 the Village of Rye Brook Zoning Board of Appeals granted Robert Wilk & Haley Wilk (the "Applicants") (1) relief from Village Code § 224-7.1) which states that no pool or associated structures or equipment shall be located in any front yard as defined in Chapter 250, Zoning; (2) a Total Impervious Coverage variance of 1,578 square feet where the maximum allowable Total Impervious Coverage for this property is 7,005 square feet pursuant to Village Code§250-37.C;and(3) a Front Yard Impervious Coverage variance of 4.2% where the maximum allowable Front Yard Impervious Coverage is 35% pursuant to Village Code § 250-37.D, in connection with the proposed construction of an in-ground swimming pool and swimming pool patio in the front yard of the property at the Red Roof Drive elevation, at 16 Birch Lane,in an R-15 zoning district on the south east side of Birch Lane,approximately 600 feet from the intersection of Old Orchard Road and Birch Lane. Said premises being known and designated on the tax map of the Village of Rye Brook as Parcel ID# 135.43-1-5.28;and WHEREAS, the Zoning Board is in receipt of an email from Haley Wilk, dated September 20, 2021 requesting an extension of the variance for another six (6) months; and WHEREAS, the Applicant needs more time to start the project due to the availability of material and contractors;and WHEREAS, the Zoning Board has the authority pursuant to Village Code §250-13.H to grant an extension of the original variance approval for an additional six (6) months if the applicant demonstrates that there is a good cause for an extension. NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Village of Rye Brook Zoning Board hereby grants a six (6) month extension of the variance referenced herein for property located at 16 Birch Lane to expire on April 5,2022 unless a building permit is issued prior to April 5, 2022. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, except as specifically modified by the amendment contained herein,the Zoning Board of Appeals Resolution dated April 6,2021, and the conditions set forth therein,is otherwise to remain in full force and effect. Page 2 of 7 Zoning Board of Appeals October 5,2021 Chairman Moscato called the roll: Steven Berger Voting: Excused Glenn Brettschneider Voting: Aye Jamie Schutzer Voting:Aye Joel Simon Voting: Aye Don Moscato Voting: Aye The resolution was adopted by a vote of four ayes and zero nays. Chairman Moscato called for the first item on the agenda. 1.1. #21-026 Howard Gordon& Susan Gordon 11 Candy Lane Rebuild rear deck with new firepit and install new siding. Michael Izzo,Building Inspector advised the Board that an email in opposition was received at 4:30 this afternoon from Jennifer Fissekis of 21 Argyle Road. It was not uploaded to the website prior to the meeting. Steve Marchesani,Architect for the project addressed the Board. Mr. Marchesani gave a brief overview of the proposed alterations which include new decking,railings, and barbeque on the existing deck. The existing deck was built at the time the house was built, 1986/1987. The deck will be staying the same size. Chairman Moscato explained that if this deck was not built thirty years ago,it would be denied. The age of the deck does factor in. The house is in an R-7 Zoning district which is a smaller district. Mr. Marchesani stated that when the Certificate of Occupancy was issued, this deck was on the survey. Chairman Moscato asked Michael Izzo if he knew how this could have received a C/O. Michael Izzo couldn't speak of how the Building Inspector at that time could have issued a C/O for something that wasn't code compliant. Steve Marchesani asked Michael Izzo what the code was then for decks under 18 inches being treated the same as a patio. Mr. Izzo said he will look into the previous Code. The Board discussed the difference between a patio and deck on grade.They requested additional information in the form of elevations and photographs.The size of the deck was a main concern for the Board. The Board felt that approving the variance requested as is would create an opportunity for other properties wanting to do the same thing. Chris Scelfo, Optimum Building Corp contractor for the project, addressed the Board. Mr. Scelfo explained that the structure of the deck is to remain. The proposed work consists of removing the pressure treated wood and update it with new materials. Mr. Scelfo stated they can possibly reduce the size of the deck to reduce the variances required. Even the approved plan from 1986 was not compliant with the Zoning Code. Chairman Moscato explained that the applicant can come back to the Board with revised plans. Page 3 of 7 Zoning Board of Appeals October 5,2021 Chairman Moscato called for members of the public wishing to address the Board in support or opposition to the application. John Grzan of 10 Candy Lane addressed the Board. Mr. Grzan has been a neighbor to the Gordon's for 34 years. He is in support of their application. Mr. Grzan gave a history of the purchasing of his home and having to get a Zoning Variance for his deck at that time. He believes this is a patio and not a deck. Chairman Moscato stated that a couple letters in support of the application were received and one letter today against the application. Chairman Moscato read into the record the letter submitted by the John Fissekis & Jennifer Fissekis of 21 Argyle Road. Susan Gordon,property owner addressed the Board. Ms. Gordon explained that the letter received is not from the property directly behind them. They purchased the home trusting the builder. They never knew there was an issue with the deck until now. There being no more members of the public wishing to address the board, Chairman Moscato called for a motion and a second to adjourn the public hearing to November 2, 2021. Chairman Moscato called for the second item on the agenda. 1.2. #21-028 (Adjaurnedm Se Stember 8, 2021) Valenti Communications Corp. 111 South Ridge Street Convert office space to an art studio. Chairman Moscato gave a brief recap on the meeting from last month and some documents the Board asked the applicant to submit. The Board and Counsel reviewed the financial documents submitted. Jerome Valenti of Valenti Communications Corp and Rudolph Zodda of Bleakley Platt&Schmidt addressed the Board. Mr. Zodda explained that the financial documents have been submitted and thinks the application is ready to be voted on. Chairman Moscato stated for the record that the requested 2020-2021 financials were submitted, and the applicant also provided records back to 2014-201 G when two large tenants vacated the building. The data clearly shows a substantial drop in income for the property over time. Chairman Moscato stated he is comfortable with the financial information provided by the applicant in addressing the issue of financial hardship. Chairman Moscato called for members of the public wishing to address the Board in support or opposition to the application. There being no one,Chairman Moscato read the following resolution: Page 4 of 7 Zoning Board of Appeals October 5,2021 RESOLUTION WHEREAS,application has been made to the Zoning Board by Valenti Communications Corp. (the "Applicant") for a use variance to permit the conversion of office space to an art studio on property located at 111 South Ridge Street,in the C1 zoning district on the east side of South Ridge Street, at the intersection of Franklin Street and South Ridge Street. Said premises being known and designated on the tax map of the Village of Rye Brook as Parcel ID#141.27-1-29;and WHEREAS,the Applicant seeks a variance from Village Code § 250-32 to permit an art studio use in the C-1 zoning district where art studio uses are not permitted;and WHEREAS, the Applicant seeks to enter into a lease with a tenant known as Oodle Monkey Art,Inc. ("Oodle Monkey") for use of the Property as an Art + Discovery Studio,which provides educational instruction, enrichment, tutoring and art literacy programs to children and adults;and WHEREAS,a duly advertised public hearing was held on September 8, 2021 and continued to October 5, 2021,at which time all those wishing to be heard were given such opportunity;and WHEREAS, the public hearing was closed on October 5,2021;and WHEREAS, the proposed action is an Unlisted action pursuant to the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act;and WHEREAS, October 5, 2021, after taking a"hard look" at the Environmental Assessment Form and all of the associated materials prepared in connection with the use variance request,undergoing an uncoordinated review, the Board herein adopts the attached Negative Declaration regarding the use variance request;and WHEREAS, the Board, from the application, after viewing the premises and neighborhood concerned,and upon considering each of the factors set forth at Section 250-13(G)(a)[2][a]-[d] of the Rye Brook Code, finds: 1) The applicant cannot realize a reasonable return. The lack of return is substantial as demonstrate by competent financial evidence.The Applicant provided the Board with certified statement showing the Applicant's financial hardship experienced at 111 S. Ridge Street from years 2014 through 2020, and additionally a six-month (January June) revenue statement for 2021.The Applicant has provided "dollar and cents" proof that it cannot realize a reasonable return if the property is only used for permitted purposes as currently zoned. Since 2001, the Applicant has used the building for professional office and medical space. In January 2015, White Plains Hospital, the Property's largest tenant, vacated the Property and in January 2018,the second largest tenant also vacated the Property. Since 2015,the Applicant has been unable to fill the commercial space. In addition,the COVID-19 pandemic greatly reduced the need for office space as many businesses move to hybrid work schedules or remote work options. The Applicant is losing appropriately $12,000 per month ($144,000 per year) in lost rent. Receiving no evidence to the contrary and believing such evidence submitted to be accurate and sufficient, the Board finds the Applicant has sufficiently demonstrated through competent financial evidence that it cannot realize a reasonable return by using the property for any use permitted by the Village of Rye Brook Zoning Code. Page 5 of 7 Zoning Board of Appeals October 5,2021 2) The alleged hardship relating to the property in question is unique, and does not apply to a substantial portion of the district or neighborhood. The Applicant's hardship is unique to the Applicant's property and not applicable to a substantial portion of the zoning district or neighborhood. The existing building is unique in the Village of Rye Brook as to its design, size and parking layout. There are no other buildings similarly situated in the C1Zoning District. The building style limits the types of uses that would rent space on the Property. It is not suitable for many of the uses permitted in the C1 District. Furthermore,the application before the Board is unique.The proposed use involves educational instruction, enrichment, tutoring. and art literacy, as well as provides retail goods, including selling kits and birthday party supply kits for home use.Many aspects of the proposed art studio use The Village Board has recognized the uniqueness of this proposed use and has set forth a proposed local law to allow this use and other similar group instruction uses in the C1 and C1-P Zoning Districts. For these reasons,the Board finds that the alleged hardship is unique and does not apply to a substantial portion of the district or neighborhood. 3) The requested variance will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. Granting the use variance will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. Nor will the variance stimulate a pattern for future development that would eventually alter the neighborhood's character.The variance will allow the Applicant to use the existing vacant office space. The Property is located in the C1 Zoning District. The Property is surrounded by commercial uses and abuts residential properties to the east. The proposed art studio use is a quiet use. It will not generate any noise or odors. In addition, the proposed use will not create any change to the traffic patterns in the neighborhood or on the Property.The art studio will have 1-3 employees and will serve groups ranging from 6-18. The existing building and tenant space is conducive to the proposed use. Therefore, the variance will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. 4) The alleged hardship has not been self-created. New York jurisprudence provides that "[a] hardship is considered self-imposed if the variance Applicant purchased the property subject to the restrictions and was aware of the zoning restrictions at the time that it purchased the property" .See,Jones v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of Town of Oneonta, 90 A.D. 3d 1280, 1283 (3d Dep't 2011). An owner who knowingly acquires land for a use prohibited by zoning may not obtain a use variance on the ground of hardship. In this case the hardship is not self-created because the Applicant believed that the proposed use would be classified as a retail use or as a personal service.The term art studio is not defined in the Village Code. The proposed use is not a traditional art studio use. The use does not involve the use of any potentially hazardous equipment like a kiln or tox solvents/chemicals. The Applicant is looking for a space for the establishment of Oodle Monkey Art and Discovery Studio. The proposed use is unique and combines art and educational programing to further art education and social interaction for children and adults alike.The Applicant compares this use to a tutoring service use.The Village Board of Trustees has proposed legislation to permit these types of unique uses in the C1-P Planned Neighborhood Retail District and C1 Neighborhood Retail District. The proposed local law introduces a new use category which will include various establishments engaged in providing individual or group services involving personalized and/or specialized instruction or direction, including but not limited to exercise, personal fitness, art, dance, marital arts,yoga,music tutoring or other instructional classes and/or lessons.These uses are defined in the proposed local law as personal or group instructional studios. Such uses may be located in any C1-P Planned Page 6 of 7 Zoning Board of Appeals October 5,2021 Neighborhood Retail District or C1 Neighborhood Retail District at the discretion of the Planning Board pursuant to a special use permit granted in accordance with the procedure specified in Article IV,Section 250- 6H. For the reasons stated herein, the proposed hardship is not self-created. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Zoning Board of Appeals, in accordance with SEQRA and upon review of the Short Environmental Assessment Form and all other materials prepared, hereby adopts the attached Negative Declaration in connection with the proposed use variance finding that the use variance will not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED,that said application for a use variance to permit the conversion of office space to an art studio on property located at 111 South Ridge Street is hereby granted on the following conditions: 1) No permit or certificate of occupancy shall be issued until the Applicants have paid in full all application and consultant fees incurred by the Village in connection with the review of this application. Chairman Moscato called the roll: Steven Berger Voting: Excused Glenn Brettschneider Voting:Aye Jamie Schutzer Voting:Aye Joel Simon Voting: Aye Don Moscato Voting:Aye The resolution was adopted by a vote of four ayes and zero nays. Chairman Moscato called for the final item on the agenda. 2. SUMMARY APPROVALS: 2.1. Approval of September 8,2021 Zoning Board Summary The minutes were not completed at the time of the meeting. The Board discussed the option of meeting virtually or in person. Chairman Moscato is going to contact Steve Berger and find out his thoughts on the options. There being no further business before the Board, Chairman Moscato called for a motion to adjourn. On a motion and a second, the meeting was adjourned at 9:16 PM. Page 7 of 7 Tara Gerardi From: Haley Wilk <haleyswilk@yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, September 20, 2021 11:14 AM To: Tara Gerardi Subject: Zoning variance extension Good morning,Tara, As per our conversation today, I am requesting a an extension of the zoning variance that was issued to us back in April. Pool companies have been inundated with requests and have been very slow in getting back to me during their busy summer season,but I am currently in talks with a few companies and hope to have some forward movement within the next few weeks. Many thanks for your time and understanding. Haley 1 ] Z. G41 Q , J N i r,`C-tt7_ -jr7 L ENV 17 a H o,_17 c+I r 02 s .te r vrj C4v-, may, s o C-Jo S - 1y 2 —COO_ -v -W NN ---I cc( Q ryr cry + :sa3ou u S . H � SH' S :9S H'ld c �!1 oA c h S+ TSS o h �u .uosd Cot ZZOZ - adW S-a.i_ou aHSodoxd 9N-LLsm agx�rr nann)4aad :sa3 ou :Ieeoidde mvp•Snu gd ) O - 1 ::ou -t q :leeoidde 1 Till) mvp-gnu y ) :sa3ou .7Ao3dde� b :a3ep 083lu ) uatpo ( ) I ( ) aatp0 QdII. Rl'IVINEICI -2III.L TI"IVINHCI dg fl•) ) uatp0 :srgd ii?ng-sd :uaua-I JJo-uSTS IId/V-d :odol Imnq -(;)AanS Fmq uatp0 :V/N :DDDR 33e3S kN OZOZ ( ) ( ) :nw :adA_L Tana an=d :MvId'-ANd.L UC14 ( ) ( ) uatp0 'V/N :3' u=d :myId :'D•d'A'H ( ) ( ) :uatpp :y/ICI :3nuuad :suuId:NOIS-JNddC1S fl-dM ( ) ( ) aatpp :/d/ICI :nD d'I :se J'3'ON :3mmd :AId:D II9WMd :uarpp— X333eg—: I H antuad :gMd:SdOJ-DaI.IIQ HNOWS/WNTIV H16H ( ) ( ) :zatpp :d/N aiuuad :scold:IVDMDTIII IIrDVI IOA-A1 01 ( ) ( ) :aatpp :d/N aiuuad :suuId-IVDMDIIZ3 HJd.L-IOA-HDIH uatpp uanreA1 dur°:) grrl/► :duro:)sxa)lioM,;;; wipe ,, amoxpalH :saidoD /, :paleaS /, :padure3S 23vC :SNV-Id, ( ( ) alge3daaaeun—:pa :le°np3y/. nuaxsn� c Z i>Z G 1 pa3eQ:1�IIA2u1S� ) ( ) :nw mMd aaal :7ur2yi MIS :uoua230 d;TS :odol:NV'ld II I IS ( ) ( ) :d/N - :s333 :uogS :Suo-I:OMANFl ) us ( ) :Sunradp 3aa .aaiea�=VA*,uuo3S :Spurpam :sadolS cb :1 :spco- maas�) ) :.V.O•H i- :u�uuoD ssolD 'CH ssnul _MI T;,Z ON /. T33ecl :ddd�) �) :uonezgeSal :O/D :dg �L &rm3:S3II3 xo �d3i wxpo :109 •gd OZOZ S I nON M d _ N -VOMJo;'=lvN aueagddy Z Z 12 ZZ -Z 1 i G 2 Q Z :sa3eQ IeunrrgnS suots 'd G Z 1 j% :a3eQ jm3 tugnS : n :ad 1.3suo:) c)2 :asn 5�7/ :auoZ Z S - j;' 1 :,IgS 'o"� 1� �l :M.Tppv.�. sis FUWV unroZ 29 3si-I'PatlD 3r[uud SUTPnq • BUILDING DEPARTMENT D VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK 938 KING STREET RYE BROOK, NY 10573 NOV 12 2020 (914)939-0668 FAx(914)939-5801 www.ryebrook.org VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK BUILDING DEPARTMENT ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD CHECK LIST FOR APPLICANTS This form must be completed and signed by the applicant of record and a copy shall be submitted to the Building Department prior to attending the ARB meeting. Applicants failing to submit a copy of this check list will be removed from the ARB agenda. Job Address: Vo %j ZQ4 LAQE Date of Submission: _ /P49091-1 Parcel ID#: 135 •L4,S- 1 -S• 2-8 Zone: Proposed Improvement(Describe in detail): APPLICANT CHECK LIST: !MUST BE COMPLETED BY THE APPLICANT The following items must be submitted to the Building ?o ,_Sjr.� 1E -P*TIn .4 L ,)ca. OECD. Department by the applicant-no exceptions. 1. (/)Vompleted Application s 2. ( Two(2)sets of sealed pans. lone full .re ;maximum Property Owner: cbe , "P�N U.3%L,4 aliowable plan sze= 16"r 11. ; ankl one 1'"v 17" 3. ( T o(2)copies of the property survey. Address: l0 R�1RC1 lf�►J 4. ( o(2)copies of the proposed site plan. Phone# Q�, -3Z53- pE aW 5. ( One electronic/disc copy of the complete a plication materials. Applicant appearing before the Board: 6. ( ling Fee. 'pw1EL 7. ( )Any supporting documentation. Address: yam. frl: HAtiA ► N W!T6 8* ( )HOA approval letter. (ifapplicable) 9. ( ) Photographs. Phone# q Iy- F)&Lk' Dcigq 10.( )Samples of finishes/color chart. (a sample board or model may be presented the night of the meeting) Architect/Engineer: C,F►.111�S4ACQY�hP1.� Phone# qM- Ba4-OCAq By signature below, the owner/applicant acknowledges that he/she has read the complete Building Permit Instructions&Procedures,and that their application is complete in all respects. The Board of Review reserves the right to refuse to hear/any application not meeting the requirements contained herein. Swom to before me this / / Sworn to:4befoe me this day f M) 20c�_c day of- , 20,, a Signature of Property caner Si re kAMlicant Print Name of Property Owner Print Name of Applicant Notary Public Notary Public M 3/21/19 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK BUILDING DEPARTMENT 938 KING STREET, RYE BROOK,NY 10573 (T) 939-0668 (F) 939-5801 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD Wednesday, May 19, 2021 PAGE 3 1 Westridge Dr 1 Story Side Addition, Fire 5203 (Tauber) Pit in Rear Yard& Legalize Rear Patio Expansion 12 Lincoln Ave Amendment to Prior 5204 (Bainton) Approval 16 Birch Lane In-Ground Swimming Pool 5205 (Wilk) w/Patio, Deck, Fence, & Plantings 44 Country Ridge New In-Ground Swimming 5205 Dr(Wechsler) Pool, Patio, Outdoor Kitchen, Hot Tub, & Regrade rear Yard 259 N. Ridge St Amendment to Prior 5206 (Lanz Development) Approval, Reducing From 3 Garage Bay to Two Garage 20 Old Orchard Rd Legalize Elevation 5207 (Tillison) Changes r ML NM MR SE v JM ,/ SF AC f MI KC .ia _A- ` ���"�� Fri '- �� rya{, 'i* :of's. o..a'ttY r•� ►_ f x F i Mike Izzo From: Mike Izzo Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2020 9:04 AM To: chris@stevenscompanies.org Subject: 16 Birch Lane Attachments: Color0176.pdf Chris, Thanks for taking my call this morning. Here's the application with the revised pages and the original pages included. Please take a look at this and make any corrections necessary then seal the pages for my zoning review. Thanks. Alwel(/, IZZO Building& Fire Inspector Village of Rye Brook, NY (914)939-0668 1 Mike Izzo From: Mike Izzo Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2020 11:30 AM To: dan@danshermanlandscape.com Cc: Michal Nowak; 'tgerardi@ryebrook.org'; Laura Petersen; haleyswilk@yahoo.com Subject: FW: 16 Birch Lane Proposed Swimming Pool Dear Mr. Sherman, As an addendum to my previous email please see the following comment; 1. Village Code Section 224-7.D. prohibits swimming pools and all associated equipment within a front yard. The proposed pool is slated to be constructed within a front yard as defined by the code. Please include this and all other zoning inconsistencies on the zoning compliance table. Thank you. /zzo Building & Fire Inspector Village of Rye Brook, NY (914) 939-0668 From: Mike Izzo Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2020 10:00 AM To: dan@danshermanlandscape.com Cc: Michal Nowak<MNowak@ryebrook.org>; 'tgerardi@ryebrook.org' <tgerardi@ryebrook.org>; Laura Petersen <LPetersen@ryebrook.org>; haleyswilk@yahoo.com Subject: 16 Birch Lane Proposed Swimming Pool Dear Mr. Sherman, The Building Department is in receipt of an application and plans prepared by you on behalf of the subject property owner for the construction of an in-ground swimming pool, pool patio, and new deck stairs. Upon cursory review of same I offer the following comments; 1. None of the proposed improvements are identified on the proposed site plan save for the pool itself. Please identify all proposed improvements on the site plan including the proposed pool equipment, pool patio, wood deck stairs, and anything else slated to be installed/altered/constructed on the property including proposed grade changes. 2. The proposed improvement will require a stormwater management system in compliance with Chapter 217 of Village Code entitled: STORMWATER MANAGEMENT. Please indicate compliance with Village Code regarding stormwater management on the proposed plan. 3. All easements and other significant site features and setbacks must be shown on the proposed site plan. 4. The proposed site plan is devoid of any proposed site protection, silt fence,temporary pool safety fence, staging areas, materials storage areas, tree protection, or anything else indicating a code compliant undertaking. 1 5. The area slated for improvement appears to be within a Steep Slope as defined by the code. Please include a Steep Slopes analysis on the proposed site plan in compliance with Chapter 213 of Village Code entitled;STEEP SLOPES PROTECTION. 6. The proposed improvement does not comply with the Zoning Code regarding Impervious Coverage. Please include a comprehensive zoning compliance table on the proposed site plan. 7. The proposed improvement requires a code compliant swimming pool fence&gates or a code compliant automatic swimming pool cover the design and installation of which must be shown on the proposed site plan. 8. Please note that any design elements required to comply with the NY State Codes must be sealed by a NY State Licensed Professional Engineer or NY State Registered Architect. Please revise the proposed site plan accordingly and submit two copies to the Building Department for further review. Thank you. lff,�4ad(7, /zzo Building& Fire Inspector Village of Rye Brook, NY (914)939-0668 2 Tara Gerardi (p B)Yc—h (�(� From: Michal Nowak Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2021 1:10 PM To: Tara Gerardi Subject: FW: Wilk Attachments: SITE-PLAN-WILK.REVpdf.pdf For filing, plan and email From: chris stevenscompanies.org<chris@stevenscompanies.org> Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2021 7:59 PM To: Michal Nowak<MNowak@ryebrook.org> Cc: dan@danshermanlandscape.com Subject: Wilk Mlchal Attached please find our revised plans to address the comments of your email as follows 1. Site Plan review is required for this project. Please submit all necessary forms, fees and escrow for such. Noted, the documents will be provided in hard copy to your office tomorrow 2. Stormwater needs to be revised to show that the property is capturing and retaining stormwater for a 25 year storm. There is no capture shown for existing impervious. As we discussed an inspection I performed concluded that all impervious runoff is ca tured and piped underground and appears to be treated and released to the existing Village drain ��j� 3. Pool and or improvements shall ne moved outside of the 15'-0" drainage easement. completely The pool was moved accordingly 04 4. Pol equipment and piping shall not run through drainage easement. — Please show routing on plans. The pool lines have been shown on the plan, it is understood no lines can cross the drainage easement, a note has been added to the plans identifying the easement as not to be disturbed.a/,j 5. Steep slopes analysis must be provides in the area of work and disturbance. Refer to section 213 of the Village Code A second sheet has been added delineating the steep slopes6%/4� 6. Provide staging, access, routes. 0/L Construction entrance location has been added to the plan 7. Provide protection for drain lines within easements avoid heavy trucks and equipment directly over Construction fencing has been called out on the plans to chordin off the area Thank you Chris Z -zs"' " Michal Nowak From: Michal Nowak Sent: Tuesday,January 5, 2021 3:10 PM To: dan@danshermanlandscape.com; CHRIS@STEVENSCOMPANIES.ORG Subject: 16 Birch lane Pool -Wilkes I have reviewed the above noted application and have the following comments: 1.) Site Plan review is required for this project. Please submit all necessary forms,fees and escrow for such. 2.) Stormwater needs to be revised to show that the property is capturing and retaining stormwater for a 25 year storm. There is no capture shown for existing impervious. 3.) Pool and or improvements shall ne moved outside of the 15'-0" drainage easement. completely 4.) Pol equipment and piping shall not run through drainage easement. —Please show routing on plans. 5.) Steep slopes analysis must be provides in the area of work and disturbance. Refer to section 213 of the Village Code 6.) Provide staging, access, routes. 7.) Provide protection for drain lines within easements avoid heavy trucks and equipment directly over ✓tilicFf d 1. ✓Vawctfi Superintendent of Public Works And Engineering ISA Arborist Village of Rye Brook 938 King Street Rye Brook,NY 10573 P: 914-939-0753 x 2965 F:914-939-5801 "J ublic`?. o%& —.J fie fieantbeat o f thin Vittage" 1 �l� ±` LOG IN DATE: BUIL G DEPA ENT �� V LAGE OF RYE K COMPLETION DATE: 938 KING STREET RYE BROQ ,NY 10573 ASSIGNED TO: 9t32 ASSIGNED BY: COMPLAINT#: COMPLAINT FORM DATE: RECEIVED BY-�;� LOCATION: ZZO PARCEL I.D.#: �i % �C� Zone: USE: /�W� OWNERAD Q 1etl Address& Phone: Aa 01;e (91 7),3Q0-- 933 / SOURCE: C.[//04!GylY/ Phone/Letter/Other: Address&Phone: l l / COMPLAINT: ���/ /�9/r) L islS ,cr '� i 7C e- /,l0 T 4t POSSIBLE VIOLATION: INSPECTORS LOG DAT STATUS ANSPECTOR Qv� T ci o ^ ; zx w � � ap p CO m ~ 40 v, a = , O m m 0.0 a w ,.. I•�1 w c� � w op Q o� W ►� �,j � � � � c z W W 1 1 X o 0 79 16, O _o 0 A "ow •"�a Al f y t s' aY �: t.. � �Ti�,�l` a�/ //7/'T a` /Jl�i2i�fGy'O A ® DATE(MM/DDIY Y1) CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE 11130/2021 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER,AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED,the policy(ies) must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsements. PRODUCER CONTACT Elizabeth Cox Jamerson-McLean Corporation P"o"E 407 366-3482 ac No: 407 366-8508 PO Box 621149 ADDRIESS: Elizabeth 'mcleaninsurance.com Oviedo, FL 32762 INSURE S AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC8 INSURER A: The North River Insurance Company 21105 INSURED INSURER B: United States fire Insurance Company 21113 New England Propane Co., Inc. INSURERC: Certain Underwriters of Lloyd's Greenwich Propane Co.,Inc. INSURER D: 162 Grassy Plain Street INSURERE: Bethel CT 06801 INSURERF: COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: REVISION NUMBER: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES.LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. INSR TYPE OF INSURANCE ADDL SUBR POLICY EFF POLICY EXP LTR POLICY NUMBER LIMITS X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE f 1,000,000 CLAIMS-MADE �OCCUR DAMAGE O RENTED PREMISES Ea occurrence $ 100,000 MED EXP(Any one person) $ 5,000 A 506-903201-1 12/01/2021 12/01/2022 PERSONAL&ADV INJURY $ 1,000,000 GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: GENERAL AGGREGATE $ 4,000,000 X POLICY JE� LOC PRODUCTS-COMP/OP AGG a 4,000,000 OTHER: $ AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY Ea a¢I ki8D SINGLE LIMIT § 1,000,000 X ANY AUTO BODILY INJURY(Per person) $ A AUTOSD DONLY AUTOSULED 506-903201-1 12101/2021 12/01/2022 BODILY INJURY(Per accident) $ X HIRED Ix NON-OWNED PROPERTY DAMAGE s AUTOS ONLY AUTOS ONLY Per accident $ UMBRELLA I X OCCUR EACH OCCURRENCE $ 4,000,000 C X EXCESS I CLAIMS-MADE 21•RENMA2100055.200006.01 12/01/2021 12/01/2022 AGGREGATE E 4,000,000 DIED I X I RETENTION O $ WORKERS COMPENSATION X I SPR EATUTE ER AND EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY Y/N ANY PRO PRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE E.L.EACH ACCIDENT b 1.000.000 B OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? ❑ N f A 408-742339-5 12/01/2021 12/01/2022 (Mandatory in NH) E.L.DISEASE-EA EMPLOYE $ 1,000,000 If yes,descnbe under DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below E.L.DISEASE-POLICY LIMIT $ 1,000,000 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONS/VEHICLES (ACORD 101,Additional Remarks Schedule,may be attached If more space Is required) Email: Ipetersen@ryebrook.org CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION Village of Rye Brook, NY SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE 938 King Street THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN Rye Brook, NY 10573 ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Fax:914-939-5801 ©1988-2015 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. ACORD 25(2016/03) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD STATE OF NEW YORK WORKERS' COMPENSATION BOARD CERTIFICATE OF NYS WORKERS' COMPENSATION INSURANCE COVERAGE la.Legal Name&Address of Insured(Use street address only) lb.Business Telephone Number of Insured New England Propane Co., Inc. (203)792-7654 Greenwich Propane Co., Inc 162 Grassy Plain Street lc.NYS Unemployment Insurance Employer Bethel, CT 06830 Registration Number of Insured Work Location of Insured(Only required if coverage is specifically ld.Federal Employer Identification Number of Insured limited to certain locations in New York State, i.e., a Wrap-Up or Social Security Number Policy) 06-1255916 2.Name and Address of the Entity Requesting Proof of 3a. Name of Insurance Carrier Coverage(Entity Being Listed as the Certificate Holder) United States Fire Insurance Company 3b.Policy Number of entity listed in box"la" Village of Rye Brook,NY 408-742339-5 938 King Street Rye Brook,NY 10573 3c. Policy effective period 12/01/2021 to 12/1/2022 3d. The Proprietor,Partners or Executive Officers are included. (Only check box if all partners/officers included) X all excluded or certain partners/officers excluded. This certifies that the insurance carrier indicated above in box "T' insures the business referenced above in box "la" for workers' compensation under the New York State Workers'Compensation Law.(To use this form,New York(NY)must be listed under Item 3A on the INFORMATION PAGE of the workers'compensation insurance policy). The Insurance Carrier or its licensed agent will send this Certificate of Insurance to the entity listed above as the certificate holder in box"T'. The Insurance Carrier will also notify the above certificate holder within 10 days IF a policy is canceled due to nonpayment ofpremiums or within 30 days IF there are reasons other than nonpayment of premiums that cancel the policy or eliminate the insured from the coverage indicated on this Certificate. (These notices may be sent by regular mail.) Otherwise,this Certificate is valid for one year after this form is approved by the insurance carrier or its licensed agent,or until the policy expiration date listed in box"3c';whichever is earlier. Please Note: Upon the cancellation of the workers' compensation policy indicated on this form,if the business continues to be named on a permit,license or contract issued by a certificate holder,the business must provide that certificate holder with a new Certificate of Workers' Compensation Coverage or other authorized proof that the business is complying with the mandatory coverage requirements of the New York State Workers'Compensation Law. Under penalty of perjury,I certify that I am an authorized representative or licensed agent of the insurance carrier referenced above and that the named insured has the coverage as depicted on this form. Approved by: McLean ( i e of authorized representative or licensed agent of insurance carrier) 7� Approved by: 11/30/2021 Signature) (Date) Title: President Telephone Number of authorized representative or licensed agent of insurance carrier: 800-393-6640 Please Note. Only insurance carriers and their licensed agents are authorized to issue Form C-105.2. Insurance brokers are NOT authorized to issue it. C-105.2(9-07) www.wcb.state.ny.us 7 S � 4�n"�., w. •ay,?"'.. y... �1 -,• ` �.. T ''^''pS ,A'w`+n '�'!�+w ./ ��i 1,a• •�^w7 \Win.. r,5a �. a\S< ?r,°:i ��Y f�� '�O�4 Yµ�f �O�A� qy��q t„O�F• ��i "� �a :..� ) ti � �l �,r h ��. {. yfyf>� "� v }ry' 1• "w'1�' v iN'�"'Mt1gy\\3v �I�. `` � M 4• a7 1�+rt �m'''S./ `�, " : a��� �.w. '�Ib�11� �,I)Mi�'��'�� hci4/i�I !!h11�`til1llYli�1 �{��? f 4�j�,' rp•� ��`�� ' :� (t<o)> � • y { IRE,4a QOl . t a N „9 o LZ0 aQi': �N� � ✓1 y o fu,�: N. LO l(ts)> w LL Z ction 1'J LQ ui u a Wc `;r w = 3 s 0 ti 0-I cz j v O 3•:� � — C a�i O � ' = IACt f t. .tit. : f �'�;r yn y G th •,:v `=`>�.: d � yam., , +' .�'' /<to) 40 � �., i;;�,/,�,�..; +3`,,,1,/�,,11 -.a 3.. �''1 h t ,_... '^111 III f�... 3;,;• h s ''� ,1,=•.,i,Il 1 ,If a <(o)► l w F yLIi1i1 t1 111N 1��w ,II/i 1 p w {(1, JIi1.1 K w III/i11 w , Ii• a w 41l 1 Y, a,�' �� �,i�61�7 3�,, �if0'�� �4� ��t�� •,m,�;'���w�>rr' ' L' �0��;y. rr�5• •>;lto�1'+ ayr 4 W �O�r^p �Oy �•.�:r�Pf �O�r •,�oa � � �0� tti,}J'�" O; +�Y, >z�„ • �1 .4COROR CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE DATE,MD 1, THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND,EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S),AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER,AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED,the policy(ies)must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED,subject to the terms and conditions of the policy,certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). PRODUCER UUNIACI NAME: Andrea Kohlman Kohlman Agency LLC ONE A/C,N Et): (914)259-8988 A/C,No): 888 Route 6 ADDRESS: Andrea(a)KohlmanAgency.com INSURER(S)AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC• Mahopac NY 10541 INSURER A: ERIE INS CO 26263 INSURED INSURER B: ERIE INS PROP&CAS CO 26830 ARENA CONTRACTING INC INSURER C: 132 PEARL ST INSURER D: INSURER E: PORT CHESTER NY 10573-7614 INSURER F COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: REVISION NUMBER: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT,TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN,THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES.LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. LTR TYPE OF INSURANCE INSD WVD POLICY NUMBER (MM/DD/YVYY) (MM/DD/YYYY) LIMITS V COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1.000,000 CLAIMS-MADE OCCUR PREMISES Ea occurrence $ 1,000,000 MED EXP(Any one person) $ 5,000 A Y Y Q39-6550172 03/15/2021 03/15/2022 PERSONAL&ADV INJURY $ 1,000,000 GENIE AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: GENERAL AGGREGATE $ 2.000.000 HPOLICY JECT LOC PRODUCTS-COMP/OP AGG $ 2,000,000 OTHER $ AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY Ea accident $ 1,000,000 ANY AUTO BODILY INJURY(Per person) $ A OWNED SCHEDULED Y y 03-6540045 03/15/2021 03/15/2022 BODILY INJURY(Per accident) $ AUTOS ONLY AUTOS Q HIRED NON-OWNED TRUPMM DAMAGE $ AUTOS ONLY AUTOS ONLY Per accident) LA LIAB OCCUR EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1,000,(K)O q EXCESSUMBREL LIA9 CLAIMS-MADE Y Y Q27-6570084 03/15/2021 03/15/2022 AGGREGATE $ DED RETENTION$ $ ORKERS COMPENSATION YIN N AND EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY STATUTE ER ANY PROPRIETORIPARTNERIEXECUTIVE E.L.EACH ACCIDENT $ 100,000 B IFFICER/MEM ') EXCLUDEDT NIA Y Q87-6500555 03/15/2021 03/15/2022 IIIESCRIPTION andatory In NH) E.L.DISEASE-EA EMPLOYEE $ 100,00(1 yes,describe underE.L.DISEASE-POLICY LIMIT $OF OPERATIONS below 500,000 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONS/VEHICLES (ACORD 101,Additional Remarks Schedule,may be attached If more space is required) CERTIFICATE HOLDER IS LISTED AS ADDITIONAL INSURED. CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE Village of Rye Brook THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF,NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN Building and Code Enforcement ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. 938 King Street Rye Brook,NY 10573 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Palfrix* G. Kr,{n l woo - ©1988-2015 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. ACORD 25(2016/03) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD 04 YORK Workers' CERTIFICATE OF STATE Compensation Board NYS WORKERS' COMPENSATION INSURANCE COVERAGE 1a.Legal Name&Address of Insured(use street address only) 1b.Business Telephone Number of Insured Arena Contracting,Inc (914)939-1235 132 Pearl St Port Chester,NY 10573 1 c.NYS Unemployment Insurance Employer Registration Number of Insured Work Location of Insured(Only required if coverage is specifically limited to 1 d.Federal Employer Identification Number of Insured or Social Security certain locations in New York State,i.e.,a Wrap-Up Policy) Number 161654097 2.Name and Address of Entity Requesting Proof of Coverage 3a.Name of Insurance Carrier (Entity Being Listed as the Certificate Holder) ERIE INSURANCE PROP/CASUALTY 3b.Policy Number of Entity Listed in Box"1a" Village of Rye Brook Q87-6500555 Building and Code Enforcement 938 King Street Rye Brook,NY 10573 3c.Policy effective period 03/15/2021 to 03/15/2022 3d.The Proprietor,Partners or Executive Officers are ❑ included.(Only check box if all partners/officers included) N❑ all excluded or certain partners/officers excluded. This certifies that the insurance carrier indicated above in box"3"insures the business referenced above in box"1a"for workers' compensation under the New York State Workers'Compensation Law. (To use this form, New York(NY)must be listed under Item 3A on the INFORMATION PAGE of the workers'compensation insurance policy).The Insurance Carrier or its licensed agent will send this Certificate of Insurance to the entity listed above as the certificate holder in box"2". The insurance carrier must notify the above certificate holder and the Workers'Compensation Board within 10 days IF a policy is canceled due to nonpayment of premiums or within 30 days IF there are reasons other than nonpayment of premiums that cancel the policy or eliminate the insured from the coverage indicated on this Certificate.(These notices may be sent by regular mail.)Otherwise,this Certificate is valid for one year after this form is approved by the insurance carrier or its licensed agent,or until the policy expiration date listed in box"3c",whichever is earlier. This certificate is issued as a matter of information only and confers no rights upon the certificate holder. This certificate does not amend, extend or alter the coverage afforded by the policy listed, nor does it confer any rights or responsibilities beyond those contained in the referenced policy. This certificate may be used as evidence of a Workers'Compensation contract of insurance only while the underlying policy is in effect. Please Note: Upon cancellation of the workers'compensation policy indicated on this form, if the business continues to be named on a permit, license or contract issued by a certificate holder,the business must provide that certificate holder with a new Certificate of Workers'Compensation Coverage or other authorized proof that the business is complying with the mandatory coverage requirements of the New York State Workers'Compensation Law. Under penalty of perjury, I certify that I am an authorized representative or licensed agent of the insurance carrier referenced above and that the named insured has the coverage as depicted on this form. Approved by: Patrick B. Kohlman (Print name of authorized representative or licensed agent of insurance carrier) Approved by: / L(�" �? izd/GGi7L(,t.I1i. / l 1/28/2022 (Signature) (Date) Title: Principal Agent Telephone Number of authorized representative or licensed agent of insurance carrier: (914)259-8988 Please Note: Only insurance carriers and their licensed agents are authorized to issue Form C-105.2. Insurance brokers are NOT authorized to issue it. C-105.2(9-17) www.wcb.ny.gov Laura Petersen From: Mike Izzo Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2022 3:59 PM To: Laura Petersen;Tara Gerardi; Steven Fews Subject: FW: Message from UDig NY From: UDig NY Exactix <tickets@exactix.udigny.org> Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2022 3:58:23 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada) To: Mike Izzo Subject: Message from UDig NY ****REGULAR**** DIG REQUEST from UDig NY for: VIL RYE BROOK Taken: 03/29/2022 15:57 To: VIL RYE BROOK PRIMARY Transmitted: 03/29/2022 15:58 00002 Ticket: 03292-002-048-00 Type: Regular Previous Ticket: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ State: NY County: WESTCHESTER Place: RYE BROOK Addr: From: 16 To: Name: BIRCH LN Cross: From: To: Name: Offset: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Locate: BACK YARD NearSt: OLD ORCHARD RD Means of Excavation: MINI EXCAVATOR Blasting: N Site marked with white: N Boring/Directional Drilling: N Within 25ft of Edge of Road: Y Work Type: INSTALL POOL Estimated Work Complete Date: 04/01/2022 Depth of excavation: Site dimensions: Start Date and Time: 04/01/2022 07:00 Must Start By: 04/15/2022 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Contact Name: ASHLEY BONILLA Company: ARENA CONTRACTING INC Addrl: 132 PEARL ST Addr2: City: PORT CHESTER State: NY Zip: 10573 Phone: 914-939-1235 Fax: Email: info@arenacontracting.net Field Contact: DOMINIC ARENA i Alt Phone: 914-906-1982 Working for: BAILEY WILK ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Comments: Lookup Type: PARCEL ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Members: ALTICE USA BELL-VALHALLA/ WSCHSTR CONED SUEZ WTR WESTCHESTER VIL RYE BROOK WESTCHESTER CTY SWR 2 Laura Petersen From: Dig Safely New York Exactix <tickets@exactix.digsafelynewyork.com> Sent: Wednesday, March 2, 2022 2:46 PM To: Mike Izzo Subject: Message from Dig Safely New York, Inc. (DSNY) ****REGULAR**** DIG REQUEST from DSNY for: VIL RYE BROOK Taken: 03/02/2022 14:44 To: VIL RYE BROOK PRIMARY Transmitted: 03/02/2022 14:45 00003 Ticket: 03022-001-278-00 Type: Regular Previous Ticket: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ State: NY County: WESTCHESTER Place: RYE BROOK Addr: From: 16 To: Name: BIRCH LN Cross: From: To: Name: Offset: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Locate: WORKING AT THE BACK YARD NearSt: OLD ORCHARD RD Means of Excavation: EXCAVATOR Blasting: N Site marked with white: N Boring/Directional Drilling: N Within 25ft of Edge of Road: N Work Type: INSTALL POOL Estimated Work Complete Date: 04/18/2022 Depth of excavation: 6 FEET Site dimensions: Length 20 FEET Width 16 FEET Start Date and Time: 03/07/2022 07:00 Must Start By: 03/21/2022 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Contact Name: FLOR BONILLA Company: ARENA CONTRACTING INC Addrl: 132 PEARL ST Addr2 City: PORT CHESTER State: NY Zip: 10573 Phone: 914-939-1235 Fax: Email: flor@arenacontracting.net Field Contact: DOMINIC ARENA Alt Phone: 914-906-1982 Working for: WILK RESIDENCE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Comments: Lookup Type: PARCEL ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Members: ALTICE USA BELL-VALHALLA/ WSCHSTR CONED SUEZ WTR WESTCHESTER VIL RYE BROOK WESTCHESTER CTY SWR 1 0 LU u- 0 W di z 0 w 0 0 z z�D (n 0O m W N w rr w m U) z LOL 0 0 0 0 9 0 ')6Pfb N 20 C) a 0 1 w . wz ME— -(4, 0 9/, z 0 - 0 t 0 z I -�lb In 0 < 7�> >co 0 22 !w�9z > N U, U, co w In 0z X Ro < ,5 U) NI 0 Lo LL 0w 3 z Lu 4Z z rn z 0 N z b- E > o'o Ir I CNI w U3 E z w w z Ld N cq co U) 04 0 Lf) STONE L0 NCURSING M 2 m m 0 CNI z 0 Nw N cj CNI f z, x A 76-56 :00" 4 x 1 04 7 N F N 4 x ... 7-3 3 w L6 ....... 16 a. p OR\vE lvq, C6 04 4" 15-12, w , - D/V, \\ I / ui x co Ce) AM—tA-- x x -A 0 1 00 x Lu ;'f8a 2 OK z x I t 4- "D X�l 1 1- 1 6 /1 M I o'o x Ln 0 1c, x (o 64 LQ< Z Cp? Lr) 0 0 00 c%4 0 uj ci F- x N. LU> Lu 0 x LL, "I w z g? ev ,\ � N;84-1 0'/l f 1 15.00'//" IN cl) Lu I N CC) < C'4 x uq U)1 Lu 0 L) 00 NN, LU U)Lu U) 64 c; IN x N cl) IM c1r)If 0 F4 x �1-1 Lo NIN IM LLI x o c� o?S, A 1,IN I NoN, co'oy u, It NX IN 1 �2 /I I I q I( ' L) N, IINN/IXII z 0) N I w X- 04 > c\l (t V: o Lo 0 4cc),on'010 6 I x/ 4 NJ o Ile Roo No ca 0 0 0 co o 2 1 o I- o w) o o 8 �2 2 Eat w LU 'A o' BAZ 'o C, E 2 -o 3 LE E.1 Z R o- g E' LL do mm tb E Lurnp. -E 2 E o U) 20 s b EL -0 E!.2 o o A f 0 sj 0. o 6 8 E, . .6-:E, gg,_S IS E .!:.2� _ 2 LLJ w�- . ,! oR zA".V . E F- 0 S o o o z m o j..Z t: PO 04 w i� f 1; A-7,22,� z. 0 E bl� =.2.1.� o ).% p: I E U-o E LL� b 0 41 -t :Ea -,o 0� 2 > 3.F I-= So E 093 .8 1 -g uj 72 9 8 E 9 M E- i5 0 z w uL •................................._ .....................-_ ._..... ..._............-..._.._ .._.........._ ..._........... ....._........._.._.. ..._................... .._....... , _� General Notes 7E 1 CD 1.Contractor to verily all conci bons and dimensions pnor to the start of work, E:E R � any discrtmWncies are to be reported to the design eMineer Immediately. �'E O I 2.The contracW shall nolity DlgSafelyNY at 811,no loss than two days �� ! prior to commenung excavating activities. r c rNv i 3.All worts shall conform to Riteofficlai rules and regulations of the State of New York Z 'a,m to Building Construction,Fire.Safety anti all other applicable Municipal,State arxt N w w Federal regulations > cv 4 Underground Utilities are shown srhernatically and all utilities may not be shown hefetxl W m co > _ contractor to verity all utilities have been field marked by the approriate agency and -- >LU rely on those representations over locations indicated hereon. a t 5 Grading of the property shall be performed to provide positive drainage away from the ...._........... proposed foundation. : r cy 6 Existing underground utilities shall be terminated at curb boxes,property line,or as cat I- otherwise directed by the respective utility company. iBI£,to. Erosion Control 1,Erosion cxxitroi measures shall be installed as the first phase of work,and he BIRCH maintained throughout the durstion of the projW X -""""""""""" 2.Maintenace and installation shall be In accordance with NYSDEC"Standards and u� LOCATION h AP .-�' r- Specifications for Erosion and Sediment Contror N.T.S. 3.The Village can require additional measures he implemented at their discretion. a {�w �I LANE 4.The plans indicate locations of erosion wntrol measures however the contractor a ', tu tu must us best management prectices as necassafy to assure proper Controls. :I � a 5.The final subgrade shall recieve no foss than 4"of t<Wsoil and be sseded and mulched. / Isry° SE'a. -�� z Comstruction Management Notes l c- `\ °'uti�, 1. Construction wofkm to park on Birch Lane rather than Red Roof Drive. ✓�� V =f ♦ �"'` e��. 2. Hours of construction shall be in accordance with Village Building Code. f Vip Map Keferanci; • �^ '� 1.Survey information shown was takers from a Survey of Property prepared by Gerald O'Buckley dated October 29,2020 ! i 10 Architectural plans supersede in all building dimension J Jam, ECEOVE W IIZS <1 \` <f'y� z U 5 ,: MAY 2 0 2022 9�00 CL ,• VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK W W =�, ::•Y t` BUILDING DEPARTMENT 1RYE BROOK ZONINu COMPARISON CHART � SECTION 13:=-43 B1 OC,K 1 LOT 5 28 ZONE R 15 ADRESS ZONING REGULA`10N REWIRED EXISITNG PROPOSED �' 'A I LOT SIZE SCE-PT 1500 21 856 14C FLOOR AREA RA T IO SLR FT 3450 NC N(;' I I lz-2�oo' =t l MINIMUM FRONTAGE 7 127 127 i .�/� _ < a=ei 30*04!' w �,�,y r�_^:>:' :✓.- ��� ! HORIZONTAL LIRCI E DIAMETFR 100 100 100 L=26.83' ' :>;;.:r: P'i>> 'R�, M ;IFRONT SETBA K 40 404 404 :,:;�, r•, ONE SIDE 5E�"BACK 15 195 `♦ '•....P!•LVI0 API..Al _r.fi.ANr A TOT t TV40 SIDE YARD SETBACKS 40 40 40 ' _ `REAR SETBACK 40 402 402 i MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT'STORIES FT) 2 STORY 30 FT 2 STORY 22 Nc `• •- � `� '•.y '-.. .,��::..-.-:�•���\" --j /`, � I•iEIGI-1T SETBACK RATIO FRONT I`iIGN I SIDE,LEFT SIDE 0.6 0.47 047 1 \ � ....` ..,•': A .:,. .:.:r' 1 ;n MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE MAIN BLDR,� 1#i.o 15 4 1 .� ,•: MAXIMUM Yv LOT COVERAGE DECK 4% 140% 160111 . >; '� T`IIAXI, I�f1 LOT C>J�%ETZ4G'E Ar�CES,S BI DG 35 l? \, X.,`',: '' f'- ; > <:. '� �� 7005 P5I311 8 58,E �' y. \ �. ,r M IMUM LOT COVERAGE LOT.,OVERA.�E ' t � Q_ , � �� \•,;RED .,' MAXIMUM L<,T COVERAGE FRONT YARD 35% 34% 39 20%<ROOF s `; ,rY �^ ,,'.:�,�♦;` I•r$AXI I,.L4 LOT COVERAGE ACCESSORY BI.DG ItI+ tR LIMIT OF \;-' 1 i •.� v., � � t.l A NSA ,\ r 7 r t ...... DRIVE " a, \< J %'v lI'>IN3I<,'II'�1 OPEN SPACE A-00._..__.... 1 .t�4� 13 273 QISTURBANCE ,. `.. '.♦;•♦ ,�, I 3,136 SF ._.. i = Y _... .. ...:,f.,...r r :a\!:•r`<•r,: ` G:a-S:. Y,; ,C r{ ` "°eA? �'rs,r' v' �' (D ' �. .m �\ nr r tX i i PERMMS LEGEND _ _ "' SY� .. _ till f.RTL`H BAS9t *SS tics SEWER sel�v,t L 1•`. urD,tA,rt f 3�> ip X;2�> CL tt+;;?;';'.:f \. \��Nr� f DRNDut;F�tit£T S� SEWER CIfiW-fk1T , • 0 ♦ \ m 5C0 r:+ttS.iNC 7REt:,St7.E.,Tl'P£ l...j lN.\%RATER VALVE ♦ i ` 1YFR IrAh,lol£ �STS ills STORM SERYFC£ FIRE&*AM SPLICE.Box i t 15 FT WI-E DRAINAGE EASEMENT �. � ,� tr+T Cp1TER',ERYtCt ®c; W VALVE I DATE�PP - � h \ b A5 SHn1�N ON SURVEY BY JAMFS DIrLANU .!: ::fir :TF':ICTi:",i�: DRAINAGE MANHOLE �_x ELEt.MC SING IRAFM Sift urA.m sox W �` ''.` f:> \ \ a DATED N.3VEMi3Ek 8, 7004 AT t.00:-7 OF ® ELECTM WMa-N,£ �.POU t LEADER 0. CMJ° LITUrY eox �t:`•C lr'i t�l� MANHOLE � �`TRffT Si�.il t1E�P TEST ...................._�._..... ----- f ® -c?- ururrY Pots +�� AREA aft* MONUMCNi SEI tv TRANSMRWEN CY.lStzrtG SPOT 0.kti+!?10M (fopy PE.RC RATION TM BUILDING!�1 ECT R, ap at R"Bl ock� ��,• � ........ ...--- C..........I s t.T�� ;� .---...... CURB LINE lY � �• ^�, _�.�•..iV'� PROP£R3Y LINE CURS CJY EK=NG CONTOIJ*—IWM AfROX)MATF tArAT1AN of wATE?MNN EXISTING IY,atoin�—INTER SCALE:1"=20' DRUNACf LINE FILE COPY ........................ PR F`)-q.'O CONTOURS AfPFAKedATL iOCA)1oN of 8'PWC SMxTARY S£vfEtt ............_ rpocE i BATE NOV.22.2020 — LIMIT OF OISMRBANCE S 0251'50 W 40.18' .,-:i sn:r rt rax rrrt�t f)NSTRUCTgN FENCE SHEET 1 OF 3 rA TING-R£E To BE REMOVED JOB No.1211 L-86L060#'011'3'd SAN 'JIH�Sl(1'S iJ3HdOlSIi1H� 6L901:(iV 9/0O/9 O.fYJO 09911 I 90901,4N sui9/d 0<iy� O4197 q-V!991 0n110nb 4'd1Ry99 N 3�N 341 Sib 1i�IM luaur6eue`y u°gon�<su°� -i0<9Nuuolg -0{ig 0 N M o o, u6lsad 6ulj99ul6u3 Ilnlo o N 1ood�o3z1sa3onoaa ZZ/�E/�a '3'd`JIHOsin'S�OHdOlSNHO N f z o SFuewwo Jauue d a6e!gad LZ/8Z/b Z - J w w SluawwOO Jaaul6u3 96e11 A gad 2/9l/Z' N`dI d l l 0 SNOISIn3a Cl) O CD ' z 0~ y`l� $ 2 16 j�Z ❑W Z z CD m C)Z r u7 C O Co N Z N z <CLo00 Q VJ O Co m C) f�M zom_ S S o o W u'a a S s F w J�Q LO U N 00 4i O�N N C;oO O o�Q� W Co #Vl N �W� C7ooz���° �d o�'� �o,z a i Q Z 68: N O 3 (7 9 a z,u o Sao Ln Ix W o x c~n W N Cl CD LO CD CD a N G m CD1- PP e CDtl'7 1-CD4 i et d•L.L CO 7'� C")O LCi¢O W ° m �i ❑Lr Co { r O M Z N 6 I ' .6c z c E m D « �' LJ Z z a _ 3� ?C:a m c g E d�o c m =NN a 0O mm m w�tm dai aai =N N co n U ifi UV ' 3 m m m 2 -0 m d�`m�i o U 0 ° n T`o ° Y aw CmF- p o CaDvmoaoCE DuDoayccdm L-Wyf 0«mN C�mN DUdm 'ry->EvN,`a°i.ccOo ppd�ycG°N€, �wE L' omm�L'Lccm W mvNoO-o-dOQ nmm rE_n LLJ OUL Jit0i EO do E p ° E (;3 OP Oc d U 0 m 5-y m O ❑_Q1'' 0 (J]UHr❑�07 Uzm u�g-.a 33z. x ¢' go 8 B Ca.2 � z CO ' (1 Ha T a g E 0 a) is 8 0 > g � �8EnEm `o ° Dma oo❑m E QE��O�E 8Lo Dd m a U C mc c Cr L f ?a 072 n Z LJJ Q 0 i 0) O 9 2 2 IL>T>�: am m B '"E§ N Z n j° o•-E m0-- n } eia o 0 > 0 Co 5 O O U) 6 6 ° odc a a > F CnU � m � z nQUUOpWUO=(.)0 m d c3 W 2❑Q J LL Q 8y Aa e0( Z 0 ma Un W F- Cx.LL � ° _ m 1m W =LL W W W W W W E5 O m m E2 c D h m -m0 MT ym O E m'O wmw�tf m Q /N� CD �]_wa v N m C O-C=.� O F O D m O N m D m �-J D R. �_ Li S O LL W 3 2 US^ � od�N �mmmc°rn� oLmycvE`� c 3w a z ❑ F V x 33£ am E=CjDomL°d_ CO m co �Y m O OWJ YQ Ur�WWWWWWQ O �o 33 a aTi E m o mi c«m�-o D a o c D �.N a'm °o m c> > U U>- >7>>>>LL z I od�L° yUE'o`oL`oD�m c $mm C U� F F U Z Y000000 W F Z °�co�`tm-2 E�ummy U c4'2.2!E5 7M � He � CD � ¢ UCO❑YODUUUUUUZ W ®0 m �'v8 °amm�L°Oa�•ina�i c 'mcc�mm�m 2 o0 0: ZD ❑ Z U Q F-(n U m F-F-F-I-F--1� J ®®®0 m octc3�ycc>moX« o ommaLLEL n Ux �m Q C7d OJ[11W Q= OOOOOOa N U m-a Q fL LL 7 8 20$w o G w E 2 f)H F- H co m to m W U) =Q 1-Un O m m w J J J J J J O c7 n ci a 6 6 w of cia uS U �ci �C7 uj=W Q�ZcnLU W �� 5?_ j�? C G W Z_W OgL4zw¢== =X2_X2_m_XJm_(Xmm� =zF-Oz=O W~W Q W¢QQaQZ ❑O O J-O=z 0 Q N J LL =LL O F- O U O W 0' Q J 4C LfiF ~ 3•00,9S.9C g OUP m J Z lzL H h w Z W w Q Wz r U w Z — Q mJ z LL Z W k W U z z LL m ti� I <ro I C a•6'L�, w o N 3 D / / <of o� 1 I <Nm I l / a o W I J W N / O azp O �oz °-LL =o �Q I W L2U)acl II N \ \ S i �Jj \ 0 06 oW \ / w w \ z< J w W C W O N \ \ LU L J Z / d M �9� \ 5 I J o0 M \ 23 N �m ^n• \ \ i o W � / Z a W 0 00too W m Z CO U Z 0< \ \ \ CS w \? w \ 0 i LL U 2 •p. W� L.101.89 °� L)M• LL \ \ V '0 p o a \ \ Y �.. O \ N O CY— w N w � \ U z oN 0 U) 1 1 a N m a o _ e p m ro m z m tAD " a m xap q rn n OZj O oo s 3 .s `= - remit x Z z Ai G) r C5 m m -' - � D C G) 70 z G) 06 '• s D a O Tc O a O O O> H O H O cn @ v / rn D Z D D ro- r Z i Z ,ii rSi r oo Z Z �v 3 H z c- 3 Z y .s r* r \ i rn o 7p ➢ ro v v ZS $ �� cn r m v 3 H c^ to G� s� t :„ 3 A h cS1 y T S w '' r r� O a a► Pa .�' -i �' n ro c r N a O a O v a m v a a Z tQ a .a r crc 1 Z 3 ro (D Sl c n A a -i Z ��1 v -I 71 �r° r th z rn rt D �, ro N v H r� O C O H p m Z O O m O O Z rn `t m 7 3 N z p �° r� �° Z m to v Z �° -t ? H - N 70 -s 7c 7� z� c N p cSl o cD s ro ro to Z to r- c^ m H p v cn O p a i. x - 9�i C'i N � h Cn O v Z Z -n n t k cr o s D O ro< v ro S m S-4 S -I -n a 3 H O -n x ,_ v c r O- s N a a Z v w _z rr c cr h 0 N CD C s v r= v rri C w UHi -�4 70 < v r C 0 m < -, �° _ ro c SZ - - N c c 6 N h D F rr- W O H> m Z D m m m O wL P" C sy =� ro s o CD ro c9 C`tD fl r m 7° Z ZO ro m w O p m a H -I v h ro O z w O m v v m v Z O O -n Z H f c9 ro ro v, v v h N m 3<C Cn H m S v O !+ h v N s 7c 9 c C H 70 to n ' 4i O rr cr (� ct c C Z D �+ �. ro ro co C Z v m cn a rn cn i cn O} O 4 m ! z n (D N N zs (� rn c v ro rr CD c v m Z N O S r r Z y cn m S H CAD o L) o o . 70 cr SZ O N r- a v r m -I - s - (D SZ -1 cr _ Z ,� a m r r1 D � O 41 'n C v m A ^= z a C c v _ SZ -1 ro -p C ro N H v Z Cn r- D; f� r m m H v p fv t• !7- :£ w+ K 4 63 N � A rn c N N o C N N N D v N o Z m A m D a S Z 7v a n• �C �ry c r' n j o n " o cr Cr s -�T O N s S r C v v Z v ri w O rn O Z (!? f r .- o p r, °' y h e `� C c9 O O a v c+ N v v C a Z w D Z Z 0> O rH- a D 0 0 0< O x li r c� U c + O SC ct CT ct to ct H n i-t to O G Z H U/ r N �• Q: 7S r. 1 h z_` 'si O y r zr h S D H -+7 m m LD " C '` + v D •° _ D c t Sv Oc ro N Z h ro Z O -i D D r v D 4 G rn rn c cr CJ) ro s 3 o H Z a m o m CZn !, Z D Z T v n 3 o o O a z c rr N �+ ro v -i O X r tC H n n _ n, cr s h s v U O ro a v O -t Cn T 3 ` c) - n v z �' Z 0 Z S v T v� S -i < m m Z p H O O C z is W Cl n D 70 fi ro m e -_ s c r c4 v H a m a m v v D a •.• rn 70 z O (� CD v cr ct H Z H Cl v p n o = c� A O ct O CD 3 cr . s N v to 3 H v 3 m r Z r ca- N O m n r � �S. is �a as r n n N r O _� ro v CAD p< r cil � ro N ro -� m C m< m m X D v fv d Z s." rn= O s + N ct a v -n Z D t� Z v Z D v -i Z v m 0► CY z _ o n a N c h 4 (D v O N z r D -1 Z H X CD .: y n I z C ro cr N ro c O rr ct v T H Z v v H p -i N m -i F I- x h p O 4 s N IZ 3 s s� CD z p- I �� m C n O 0 n v Nt � S a S � N r.a < �n N rn y r cy v N s ro p N h 3 m a Z m D N D p m Z r11 D rn — _ (� z ct w c-r (7 w :ac _t, � SZ `< c9 C -Q ±. m 3 N v m C� v v Z F n c C c ro v nL -s c O C cr ro < Z Z H r Z Z CD i N rn SJ% c c9 � SZ K v cr CZ v N "t "I -i H1 © Cn D H M p Z v U1 r- oi l N N c CD IT w 3 3 s cy �, '0 = w Cn G Z a C v U1 m O O n z O v '� co ma`s % ro v p v m N m r=� a m m Z> Z p n � 9ro 9� Cs0 s O c s v Cz p� N -� Z n 3= m Z H 0 v 1 pl rtnr r 0 w. v < � s s v n z os - C v C> D ,� v D n r�i H O �G a� to oo Ym §z p U v v c cc--r v O0 ro N c rn 71 03 O N O "_i a m N H w v �° -1 tZn O .s 1 c SL T O v Z z Z- N c0 s cr n O m m -� O S m O N # s N� c � ce c c cr ro Q v m 0 mn n 3 H a ,C C a H O w `G cD v- O N c O n c Z O O m m T O Z v ti 0 T a H =r o N -: ro h ro O O �, N a v v v Z Z 5 n cr O v p N CD s iz SZ O s C v p T .i O r i (n N z m m v (7 rn 00 O C h 3 s IT p z rr ro O v < S Z 7mv C O T m C�> C N c + s c CD c ro cr m H Cn O v c� a 'y- H m v v O= =r -S CNn m m H h O Z D Z v m O n Z rt v �* ro O � m p1 T 0 m D v� 3� H 3 w a � tQ A -s CD �ro CsD 9roi s G CSD CD75 6 CST l v v S H a rn m Z O< -4 C Z H W Z -t C a m 0 -s x -1 z N C0D ri CD m v m Z (A m '� Z C7 w Oww ', ro " O N ChD c (� 9 ct m D O H , Z my ry O N o NUN �C-b Z m O 3 Z -I a a Z Z C 9 O s (D i1. (D O �' (D cclr O 3 m S v m T Z v -'c�{{ G� v C 9-' 3 h v v rr 3 0 Z m z z �E 3 S G m O (D 0 p ro N c z + coo m v O g D - � m r N < (b i �' rr v `s -i CA m q rt� A O m0 m C m N -s M c-r S c-r ct CU v m O .� H ro cg g v p 3 5 CD > m m p rMr m H (Cis n 0 m :3 ctCAD Coo cn rCh ro q v v c O 0� H v m< Z ,(ZA SA m C 6 ro Q C v a cn v m D Ln C CD (D O i it ct W y v Z m ,-� 00 rn Z- n o a v H O a Z T M a C a O N ro N Z -t a t� 7q Z O n Z ro co p�� o v m Z cD " O N O CND i2Z•1 C a m r-i m Z O v z o m O m m R u' C) - O �v nQ=m ntn -u 07DN -u -0 z 03 C) u w u N) 03 N zr rn 0 c rn 0 70 D Q ' D -i 70 ' 70 O rn --i = /'� z0 �rn z70D-b Z: O --1 Qrnz rnrnD � rn O -1 Off' �� cnz'-i70 cnz �> 70< s DO �-o� ,-,, z z Y ➢ rn ➢ O rn n0 BOZO -ern n� rna n z�N� DDrn tt� C!1 r r O rn CP n � rn rn rn � � 70 rn -{ Z 70 1-- rn n - � � s C� -1 7C rn rnQ' C) 70 �� =D� �; rnz U�D 70rnz� �> ©�°0-° D� -u rnpD rn Orn �rnrnrn �� C7n =�00 uc0�U) 0Orn C -n O Z rn rDrn� N A =v z713 O< rnG� ➢rnrn 70 z3 70 rnCQ r- -� O rn N z =nC rn= rnrn �Or-n rnz CDA� 0)UD �Zn� n,--rn z z (� rn -n-1 U) rn z rn 70 rn " " rnDZ cam" n rn CO �J -0 -I ~'�.. (7) �D Do �rn� ON zz �oct)--vCccz U z D 70 O n Qy D O nN0 Oc cnD U)�Is �► DO ��= zn-ID DzQ z C rn z -Dirrn- _ �� D� yOD rnD rn70� G� -Izni -NIX n K -10 rn-n `..� _ _ �C n_•t> U'zr- p1� 00� OO�C �n -_I rn rn i-n N 1424' `` Orn OO� 0 z cu l rr�+ 70 Qs) s 0 �' D � r-n 3� W rn� zd ��_ 50 U)> �N-n p�j�� COz+O D z C 70 O D n7� �czt)rrnn 0 aD rnrn-�0-1�c7-n --1rn " z 03 C U) rn > z C)-urnrn D70-ni z 0� � y Cz070 Z �nrnrn rn N 71 s0 �a rnn� = Z-71 O rnu/ Q-i" -C rnr0 A O -�{ A rn z HO z� �p� r- rn� 70O0 OZrn�a pZ� rn rn10 N z Nam, _ o� nn nn �zy O -u0,D o=o J. z rn W rn rn 7° F rn > 0 -a 0 r C) rn rn r rn z � C z z C� � r'-n p D rn Ci is N rn0 rrnrn CUzi rn(z�rn � ni rn7u nD ZI�D O z rn rn 70 rn n y - -1 rn -0 0 r„ 0 U) " rr- 0 70 y rn _Z O-ID z�z O �ao6�s00• O n -ni r n < rn y n rn D D a G) Z 70 C -1 -1 z• 02 30. =t �O� O G) r-rn 7Ac yc z OOCn O nC o z s8Og , _ _ O z D �° -I '� „ z 70 cn " a z C rnr 0 0 ➢ ,ZnN0 z O rn man G>o� >� rn= Cn rn O rn� \� _ _ *�''- _ DDU�-,-, 0 or z U) 03 �o03 DO ()r- N n \ ����_ - rn Z: -n0 z p nn-z ��s 03zn n --I (i rn _ -0 \ U) N rn z u rn rn u" Q= rn Gz�O _ >> z 70 NCO ?�r z70 v z I-ri --U r�-- c G)r rn 70 it o ~` D rn� -r D� 001 nrn � � O m C>03 rn rn0 O \ ; rn n�z = 00 ��0 rn0z C ZU O 07 �_ rn f n {_ , 1 rn C7 rnI'mrn /� Q C Z D �j X rn -I 1 �Dn D Zy rn-Di� O Q 0 rn ,- O C) C> 70 7�oo rn 0 N z D �' `"-IDp = < Z70 70 -1 p,-fir, z A 0 40.0 1 1 % 07o`I n ODn z =O= rn rn ----"1 1 Z" I-n0 -1 r11 O �° rn G`) D rn rn r' J *�_� ► j O z rn z X 0 a 1 I � '��• O I r Q4 -nW N-IN NU) < ' I IUz 40.0' w OD O�D Oz70rn 70 r I 1 GD = �-n W D-1 Z Cr- D v�0- nCrn n rn� ■ zrn ! 1 X nrn rrnnD rnrn (A rnO - rnnrn rn i �rn I 11 D <� �� O 7o I D 1 1 03 -0 70 O rn O -Irn G / 0 Kz 1 rno_ C70 <_ Z G) rn r� r-n X / rn 70t i ZD I i\ �r"n 00 �rn ao > O % z ! Q r' 1 i\ to < rn n n -� OC z� ! j qO \� p0 �O<zia n z z 70 ! Z J O o \ < U) rn rn U) rn N Or c �� i G�.. JI D� \\-' �0 rn n 0 D O 0rTl U)0� \ n u \\ l�� rn rn �< 07, O ii < 0 ` l = U) \ �s CA Z D rn io at rn o G "" G rn \ '�-�- W rn D O OD rTl z 3s qti 1 / \\ Dom' c!)U, Drn rn S�CFzo �� D C) / O D �o �� O-i Z U) rn -1 O 70 1 rn� Crn 700 70 -1 O 0= crn U) N prn z� �� O C t t rn i ro "rni1 D - N \ I 1 /// �� �� rn0 �y G) nrn x \\ t / rn rn0 DC W-U i O n� WO003 rn rn i \ / rn i 7 // O \\ I \ U) O / \ j z \ i rT' / s \ i 00 / C j t C) Z Gi rrn- i i p0 ` rn r7l -n rn �• p / zzD \ J U)zsy n D qs 11T < Z: RUeS o-n ` ' S !y O z rn y o�T 'S'O j0 U) � . �Mq� o� F���tiFO,Q �� �AI) Z 0 �\ ot, 'Oti 0 < < e�s�tigc� o n \ G)y o orn • i ` DrnS Q '� r- • 'o i rn OF /VO mz o070 .. •n U)0-u C -IDCA< S \ C?O� rn U) SU) rn -i Z m rn 70 s `SO'' r- rn D O m rnn CC •n -zc C7 ry K n rn Cp T8, = C m �rrn� Q co 0 O U) .tD7 ti rnzN��C� =�C m c70 0 nrn(l -I 0�nrn FIR r Z Z Q ?� W y Nz -a((� �D D r rn rn Z D rn DOp 5Cc-Ca v 6 �= az =0zi rTl Z N t S > r O rn V' rn�0 >rn p 3 rn���� 70�rn� 12-Z< rm rTI r p N O — D�a zoo ,� St -f� to CP —� 70 �oH �o� erg r Iv (> -0 n �,c� N-i un :Z� o = CPX 1, W -� ° rn —i � Z -� � z � o � o -n � rn oZR o R z a ODQ rn�C z m J� rn (�i� N N N � N z z rn rn z Via° rn � •ri r�r_C �� ..Y'; 1\{- P+R . y j� ...��LOF, 'Elk, , E AL jr ilia 'I �e:a•!' - � 'r �. .. � !'-� � - + -fir' �` _ 47 IF i d 3ice JIM it Ilk IF =1 t t r �M � _ „ I I 1 t t ._• tr •fZIK,- ' � iron- � 1 v' v'�, ►. F It T Ire ' ..'7` 'r -._ - .�.. r• r•.'i• -1.f' cif' • r a... 'Imp P fry` i[,4 - ' 't' tee CIF '�a•_;d��': 7-i`�1� � Sr�r n 1_ -.�. � �;�-�[ i-�„4,.r. .�+r - _. _-_.•l l•NL'► .r • yi J T •-`r+t ab .. ',/ i'�►t��_ , 1 !• ��� .1 1. �,�,_ a '.�- � •'. •�^ �.• a�• �- �� ^- , _►.• •t � P` i t .1yr �J�J.t Tip- ar !r 'r ' �� �'y •r 1 � �' � -�,�i. ..���ice`t-t-• - •� ..'TT�� 7. i. ' - - ' - _� - _ J •'•.•ram- -.. .-11 + • , - `�♦ -`� Wilk Residence Daniel Sherman 16Birch Lane Landscape Architect General Notes :v o + installation comply with the respective ` ti General sides and ends.The over excavation at the po ol bottom is minimum 4 2 Electrical and plumbing P Y P i ne- loco fiber lass inches(102mm). The backfill for the pool or spa bottom is a layer of cedes in effect at the construction site i r. The swimming pools and spas consist of o p g 3-inch-thick (76mm)bedding sand or 1/2"clean gravel matching the 3.That all pools are installed in accordance with manufacturer's , construction shop-formed over a mold.The material is fiberglass 6.4 mm`thick pool or spa profile. recommendations reinforced plastic(FRP),a minimum of 1/4 inch ( ' using a manual tamper and water 4 The pools and spas produced by Latham Pools Northeast,Inc. � w composed of isophtalic resin,vinyl ester resin.and fiberglass The This backfill layer is compacted 9 i West Virginia, Latham Q The pool or a is then set into place using a crane, excavator or 176 Latham Drive Industrial Park,Jane Lew, a surface finish is a neo penty!glycol gel coat. Latham Pools produces P P •� manual) and be within 1 inch (25mm)of level. Simultaneous water-fill Pools Central, Inc., 10600 West Interstate 20 East,Midland,Texas, various styles of swimming pools and spas When installed in Y Williams, afifomia; and backfill operations then commence.The backfill is compacted with and Latham Pools, Inc, i 21.Crawford Road, are accordance to Latham Pools installation procedures,the pools and P Latham Pools Southeast, 9 Country Road 54E. Zephyrhills, FL rn � with applicable requirements of the following codes a tamper and water.The installer must ensure that the backfill level � . spas cc p y pp q E and water level are approximately the same throughout this procedure manufactured under a quality control program with inspections y i 2015/2018 Intemational Building Code®(IBC) ' 2018 Intemational Residential Code(IRC) After completion of the backfill and plumbing,the decking is placed Columbia Research B�Testing Corporation(AA-527). Z 1997 Uniform Building Code(UBC) Decks are prepared as indicated in Figures 1 through 4: i decks are constructed as noted in Figure U 6 BOCAO National Building Code/2003(BNBC) 1 Cantilevered concrete de tv i 2018 Intemational PlumbingCode®(IPC) 1 in all cases. O O 2012/2015 IAPMO Uniform Plumbing Code(IAPMO UPC) 2 Cantilevered decks are constricted w th br ck or stone as noted ♦... in round Swimmin Pools Figure 2 in all cases ! 2012 ANSI/APSP/ICC 5 Residentialg 9 i ure 3 in all P/ICC-3 Permanent) Installed Residential Spas 3. Raised bond beams are constructed as noted n Figure E 2014 ANSI/APS Y cases. and Swim Spas Figure 4 installations are constructed as noted n gure ? ! a 2013 ANSI/APSP/ICC-7 Suction entrapment Avoidance 4. Aboveground I U ! 2011 ANSI/APSP-16 in all cases. ' 2018 Intemational Swimming Pool and Spa Code- Barriers are required where pools are on premises of UBC Group R, iSPSC-ICC Division 3,Occupancies or IBC Group R Occupancies.The barriers ( ) must comply with Appendix Chapter 4, Division 1,of the UBC or , 2007 ANSI/ASME-Al12 19.8 Section 3109.4 of the IBC 2014/2017 National Electric Code(NEC, i 2015 Uniform Swimming Pool Spa, Not tub Code(IAPMO) I • 0 9 Expansive soils' ECE V1 ! -+-� �-• ions depths and capacities are shown in Table For installation of pools or spas in expansive soils,the followingD U Q �• The overall pool dimensions, p P additional installation details must be followed subject to code official's � �-- 1 and Table 4.The units comply with ANSIINSPI-5, specified in O Section AG103.1 of the IRC,and IAPMO IGC-2000',specified in the approval: FEBR1 2 8 2022 Z >' N UPC. i i cc Models described in Table 2,Table 3,and Table 4 can be placed up 1. All surfaces adjacent to the pool or spas must be excavated to a � he pool bottom and Q rn to - hes 49.Smm above round These pools and spas may minimum depth of 12 inches(305 mm)beneath t p VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK +� a minimum 6 inches(152 mm)behind the pool walls. Ewood decking.Unless elevated BUILDING DEPARTMENT �"' L1J CC Lo be placed with or without concrete or g portions of the units are protected from sunlight by soil berms,decking. 2 Any soft or loose soils exposed by step 1 must be removed unt l o P and loose the upper 6 w 0 - r P exposed material s solid If the soil is still soft a PP etc.,these portions must be coated with a UV-inhibiting opaque paint expo L' o S ' M m inches (152 mm)of all horizontal excavation surfaces must be scarified .}.� Q cc X X that is compatible with the laminate. surfaces must complywith the IPC or UPC. Electrical work must and compacted with mechanical equipment.The compacted �(sMPL-'�',NCF (� (� � o i All plumbing E e The pool and and the excavated wall surfaces must be maintained in a moist ODE ;� J comply with the code in effect at the construction site p V. CO °' cq P y 'I he first lift of backfill or fill is placed against the surfi;e �0�0 RESIDENTIAL CODE OF yEVv ��ORh STATE— Including Sec R�`b o �, ,� � spa must remain full of water at all times. A permanent sign,bearing condition until t method necessary to consolidate �`�e Z 0 Zo C The term compaction implies any Y T ca 4 Q: � the following statement,must be attached to the pumping equipment. P keep the pool or structure from settling •--- � °� F` m Notice-The pool or spa is designed to remain full of water at all times native and fill materials to e p p 9 ELEC+R!C�`:� NL 'v981'vL of p P 9 If the water level is allowed to drop 3 The excavated bottom area of the pool or spa must be backfilled � m be damaged l CONSTRUCTION AND►NSTAE.LATION OF ELECTRIC WIRING.GROUNDING AND � CQ fl a Cn � � c The pool shell may g h skimmer When appreciable draw-down is noticed or if it with granular import material to approximately 6 inches (152 mm) THE CO S a„ below the PP + a wetted and com acted. BONDING_,AND EQUIPMENT ARE SUB}ECT TO THE STATE CODE AND TO THE CURRENT "��"' � bottom o0 ors P NEC 0 (3� � Q Z o n the pool or a,contact Latham Pools or below the bott P p F T RIC CODE RE UIREMENTS NEC 20'� becomes necessary to drat p P 152 mm must be backfilled beneath NATIONAL_l_cC Q dealers for instructions. 4 The remaining 6 inches( ) its de n .ALL PLUMBING ivI`uST COMPLY WITH TIIE CURRENT.ADOPTED STf�-i E CODE E ii a a ii the pool or spa and outside the pool walls with compacted clean 0 C A permanent label must be installed adjacent to the above sign P P or spa must be filled with water as Q X U <L indicating the Latham Pools dealer's name address and telephone granular import material.The poolp Q �..- backfilling progresses to a level equivalent to that of the backfill.The :� cn number 3 cn placed in compacted la ors of approximately 6 inches Reviewed by m C6 � � E � backfill must be plac P Y while a uniform height of backfill is maintained around the -� c •C Installation Procedure (152 mm) g 10140Columbia Research P.O. ox 9E — without a soil investigation by pool or Spa. 101ao Starr Road, . .Box 933 (a O (� � � � � Latham pools and spas may be installed 9 professional RDP . subject to the building official's 5 Positive surface drainage away from the perimeter of the pool Windsor,CA 95492 ....J � N a registered design ( ) 1 kavulm ( Phone 707-495-0420 UJ approval, provided none of the following conditions are encountered at and surrounding deck s required and critical to installations in highly 'AS ana ICC/ES Apprcved Testing Laboratory PP ----- Q O U the site expansive soils Surface area drains and surface drainage swales or to revent ondin or saturation Seal existence of uncont,oilable groundwater within the depth of sub-drains must be placed as neededp P 9 .._ U 1. The of the soil around the perimeter and vicinity of the pool to preventthe pool or spa excavation. in the soil ` •� excessive shrink-swell or volume changes �� �'=/V 2. The existence of an uncornpacted fill in contact with any portion - • • • X of the pool or spa. ii G 3. The existence of any soil types with an angle of repose that will identification page-1 GowW NotesSoir�s ;/`� •;^,`� � '� not support the walls of the excavation at desired slopes. Latham pools and spas are identified by the foilow,ng information Page 2 Tables 1-3 - ' 4. Danger to adjacent structures posed by the proposed pool or Imprinted on the top step of the pool or spa- manufacturer's Warne .Pap 3 FiM 1 _ pool or spa model designation,a coded (Latham Pools)and address, p P Page 4 Pool Models spa location. � � ,- > r enin sin soil that would not serial number and the evaluation report number(ESR-2014). Page 5. The existence of any cracks o op g P�5 Pod Models i ) ,_ f the ualit control agency,Coiumb,a "I - j - /- X confine sand or 112"clean gravel bedding. The units also bear the label o q y 9 P�g Pool Models r Research&Testing Corporat-on(AA-527). Pool Modefs ' PIrlage• If any of the con ditions above is encountered, excavation must cease P�8 Spa Models 8 Tanning Ledges � w immediately.The specified conditions at the site must then be reviewed Findings- That the fiberglass one piece swimming pools and spas are Page 9 AltwuVive RecUm9ation Systems `� ; I must in compliance with the above listed codes as noted in ESR-2014 �,� -`` � ' !'� a and recommendations made by the RDP The building official _ subject to the following conditions James �. MarX, r=�=-�__ _ -•� � � approve the RDP s report before work is completed. � The construction and pool/spa Installation comply with this report � he contours of 1 vary u to 3%-all DIY Professional Engineer Lie- 56467 f of 9 The pool or spa excavation profile must coincide with t Length,width and depth may ry p the pool.The over excavation is minimum 6 inches(152mm)on the and the manufacturer's instructions dimensions are to outside edge of coping.measured E from paralie,lines Z m N o TABLE 1- POOLS SHALLOW,�POOL CODE SIZE 7PTHS GALLONS WIDTH x LENGTH APPROX. NUMBER: TABLE 2- POOLS Cn Aruba ARU 11 x 22 3 6 5 5,200 177 Page 4 Type 0 c w Astoria JFRX.. 115'-10"x 40' 3'-6",7' 15,600 548 Page 4 Type Cl- VE GROUND INSTALLATION J Axiom CRUD 16'x 35' 4'-6",6'-6" 11,600 395 Page 4 Type 0 ABO Barcelona BAR11V x 38' 3'-6",7' 18,500 518 Page 4 TypeCODES w 31$ Pa e 4 Type C fiRU LD LU gay isle B► BY 14' 6' x 29 10" 3.6'- 10,000 g ~ x 2G 3'-6",5'-6" 7,000 226 Page 4 Type AL BermudaudaJAL 12' iv OZ Cambridge ,LN 16' x 36' 3'-6' 7' 18,000 451 Page 4 Type 0 `p BFF f Cancun CC 116P x 35'^ _ 3'-6",6'-6" 14,000 397 Page 4 Type 0 SP CRUD i Cancun Deluxe CCX _ 16'x 35* 4'-3' ,6'-6" 11,500 381 Page 4 Type 0 RT12 NffK Cape Cod 7CA 14'x 31' 3'-6",6' 12,000 325 Page 4 Type 0 B CTL ~Caribbean MR 16'x 40' 3'-6"-6'-6" 17,000 468 Page 4 Type 0 CRUM TPIC Carmel IFF 13'-8"x 30' 3'-6",6' 12,000 345 Page 4 Type 0 FR12 CRSBM '-7' 10,500 292 Page 4 Type 0 ;Chesapeake CP 12 x 31 3 ,S FP CM Claremont IV 14'x 33' 3'-7",5'-4" 11,700 416 Page 4 Type 0 THEL BHVI Clearwater iSP 10'-11"x 2(Y 3'-5",5' 3,600 165 Page 4 Type 0 Corinthian 12 RT12 12'x 25' 3'-6",5'-V 5,100 254 Page 4 Type 0�orinthian 14 ;RT14 14'x 30' 3'-6",6' 8,200 365 Page 4 Type 0 �.orinthian 16 RT16 15'-10�'x 40' 3'-6",7' 15,400 563 Page 4 Type TABLE 3- SPAS cn 15'x 34 3'-6",6'-6" 13,000 410 Page 4 Type 0 .�.� -' _oronado ;BH8 O U De i ray 8 11%10"x 25'-5" 4'-6" 8,100 264 Page 5 Type ., • • • SQUARE •• O �- 5,300 214 Page 5 Type 0 • • APPROX. -� r- Ec.rpse CRUM 12'x 26 4 x 50 Empress FR12 12'x 26' 3'-6",5'-8" 7,600 275 Page 5 Type Meridian TMRD 7'-9"x 7'-9" 2'-11" 675 51 Page S �, N Emp 3'-6' 6' 12,000 375 Page 5 Type 0 i M 9,-8„x9'-8" 3'-4" 550 64; Page 8 cn U) O rn M v Fiji FJ I 15 x 34 mystic 14'x 30' 3'-fi",6' i1,300 3b3 Page 5 TYPe stic S iilover MSW g'_8"x 10'-6" 3'_4" 55p , Page �J - � � � °FortitudeICRSBLMY P E �- °' Freeport FP 12'x 25' 1' 3' 7' S' S" 6,000 213 Page 5 Type 0 Placid �BOS 8'-1'"x 8"-1" 13' 475 45; Page 8 �- Lj,j mTO °o N Page 5 T ._ 475 45 Pa e 8 -� d Lo oCn TGEM1161x 32-7" 3'-9",5-4 g•� 364 YRe Placid S iilover BOSSW 8 1 x 8'-11 3 (n o o N Cn mGeminiP 600 5G: Page 8 - O Cn �- Genesis :TGEN 16'x 40' 2' 3'-10' ,8'-6" 20,000 553 Page 5 Type Regal RG 7'-8' x 9'-8" 3-4" .*-� O tqc 15'10"x 39'-7" 3'-5",7'-11" 14,6t)0 506 Page 5 TYpe l Re a!S iilover RGSW 8'-6"x 9'-8" 3'-4" 600 52 Pa e O En 6L M MGulf CoastP 4,. 600 63 Page 8 � � � °� n � rn c;ulf Shoe GS 15'-7"x 34'-8" 3'-7 5'-10" 15,000 423 Page 5 Type 0 Royal R r 9 8' x 7 8 3' n 264 Page S T _ .,x g._6„ 13'-4" 6Cn p0 63 Page 8 z � Q � �;, Helios THEL 12 x 24 3-9",S 4 7,500 B Yf� Royal Spillover RYSW q 8co Cn CO ., 7 138 Page 5 Type 0 'x 7' 13 420 31 Page 8 .� �, Jamaica LD 9' 10'x 19 9" 3 2",5 3, g 'Shasta LRS 7Lr '- x 2b`-9" 3'-6",5'-S" 6,800 233 Page S Typet3' 420 31 Page 8 Co r- � "' "1 O a c� M M ao lavaIn 12' Shasta Spillover LRSSW 7'x 7'-10" o 0 230 Page e 5 Type 0 - 700 73 Page �- Key West BFF 12 x 25' 7' 3'.7 6' 9,000 g Superior 'CS 8' 1' x 12'-1 3� 704 73 Pa e 8 a t C� O Z L C 0 0 x 38' 3-6 5-8' 17,500 555 Page 5 Type S iilover CSSW 8'-11"x 12'-1" 3' `J = C tKingston AP116 Superiorp 10 000 310 Page 5 Type 0 0Cc a- r t a Laguna LG 14 x 30' 3'-6' 6 _ a EO � � x Q � 00 93 Page 8 La una DeluxeJLGX 14'x NY 4 ,6 9,000 300 _ Pale 5 Type Gemini Tannin Ledge TGEMT 8-10 x 18 3 ;l0' 3 g O_ ca �-- Lake Shore CD 16'x 33' 3'-7",5 -5 15,000 480 Page 5 Y iGenesis/SynergySide Tannin Ledge_TGENT 9'-4"x 16'-6" 10" 400 Page 8 (� 3 �° " e 6 Type 200 SO! Page 8 J coo E L Majesty FR14 Tl,�x 30 3-6,6 1,120 377 Page YP Hermosa !VFTL 6'-10"x 10' 7" 10" � = � .t° >► '-7'" 4 400 209 Page 6 Type 0 - � - � Page .� Malibu CRUD 12 x 26 3'x 4 Large Picasso Tannin Ledge TPCLT 8'-8' x 15-10' 10' 300 90 8 (� O Co C C - " ' 2 300 103 Page 6 Type RT 7'-8"x 15' 8" l0" 400 105 Page 8 O -) N Maui MTK 9'-3' x 16 3' 4 ,4 !Rectangle Tanni*ig Ledge L 0. W 0 Milan CTL 10'x 16' 4' 2,450 135 Page 6 Type 0 Semicircle TSCT 8'-4"x 16' 10" 400 92 Pa e 8 � O 2 000 585 Page 6 Type I C ---••+ Monaco 1AT116'x 40' 3'•8",8 1, Montego .MT 14 x 35' 3'-7' ,5'-7" 12,400 388 Page 6 Type 0 Nebula jCRUL 14 x 30' 4'x 6' 8,000 297 Page 6 Type - ___ Ocean Breeze OB 16'x 40' 3'-6' ,5' 8" 18,900 585 Page 6 Type 0 - J -v% 16'x 35' 3'-6",6'-6" 15,250 510 Page 6 Type -y y •�'� Olympia fR16 .,. casso !TPIC 12'-2"x 24'-1' 3'-9'*,5'-4" 5,600 213 Page 6 Type 0 RockportIRP 14'x 30' 3'-7'",5`-11" 12,800 314 Page 6 Type `•`' Sirius 'CRSBM 12'x 24' 3'-6",5'-6" 6,700 239 Page 6 Type 0 - Page St.Lucia CM 12'-3"x 23•11 3'-6",5' 6,000 211 Page 7 Type r St.Thomas L 14'x 31'-6" 3'-7" 7' 13,700 396 Page 7 Type 0 i Z � . w Stargaze 14IRRT-14-- 14'x 35' 3'-6",6' 10,500 429 Page 7 Type _ f n Sunset Bay 'BHSY 14'x 32' 3'-4",5'-5" 10,000 365 Page 7 Type 0 Y _ - 5 ne TSYN 16'x 40'-2" 3'-10",6'-3" 18,000 553 Page 7 Type :� y of 9 Valencia ST 14' 4"x 27' 7" 3'-7",5'-10" 10,000 288 _ Page 7 _Type 0 M Vista Isle BHVI 12'x 28' T,6'-10" 8,000 294 Page 7 Type J Le;gcr N cf'F ar.d oppt~may vans up tc 3''c-aII c� d rnPrsfUrS are to outs;de edge o`ccoirg.measuree I I FIG FIG 2 cn Rrom para el mes I'MIN 0 CONCRETE DECK GREATER THAN a TY-:>+CAL CANTI-EVER CONCRETE DECK DEPTH OF POOL E'X6- W-4 X vv'4 3RiCK OR NA-_RA� WITH BRICK OR STONE r- 6"k6 V1'4 k�:'4 OR t.1 n '`J1jN - S _.hc .WRE«�S►�GR RESA:�NC CN G 3'MIN RE3A.R vG 3 ON 2 C C q. EACH vI EACt ~� RESIDENCE Lli S-DPED.4'.i , SLO D , v! i 6 .n�• fi^ Lij 12 ' 4 12* - j FOR CL.A.v .s Q'GA:vAN ZED FGR(:LAY r 'O' CHAIN ',4.G.AL�.AN:ZE� ,ADOBE �1�1 -.ADOBE; •0' CHAIN soi,ON,Y POOL / 3•THICK CO'V'PAC rED S016 ON_v 3'TN CK COMPAC f EG O E Ply Of / ANC -Y.'CAL '1 TYPICA.-I MIN TH CK 'h1CT-; SAND moo. 'GRAVEL FOR CLAY 4"MIN THICK COMPAC 'D'E GRAVEL FOR CLAY /• (ADOBE SOiL 3%Ly (A,708Ei SOIL ONLY ' SAND OR'2-C,EAN GRAVE. SAItirJ OR-2-CLEAN GRAVEL FIBERGLASS _ 6" � =IBERG..ASS 6' POOL SHE_ Pool sHE_. / FIG 6 ANGLE OF REPOSE (NO INCREASED PRESSURE ON POOL ;`IG 3 WALLS FROM ADJACENT STRUCTURE) TYPICAL BOND BEAM FIG 5 CONSTRUCTION � TYPICAL BOND BEAM WITH SPA U) , U - BR C>`. F'L�ED BLOCK 3 MIN. ♦� o ORPO��R=G CONCRETE B" pOuRED CONCRE CAP c: O BAC�(F�iLE:�Q RT BRICK OR STONE - PUjRFD CONCRETE CAP 10'Min �- C) SR:CK f-)R STONE SRiCK F L�cD BLOCK ��� �� O OR POURED.^VCRETE ` ^ � RE6AR h0 4 C�+Z G C ^� `V • EACH WAY 1 cc MAXIMUM � BRICK FILLED BLvC�. DECORA?V!=S"GhE.6RICK O � v OR POURED CONCRETE CR TILE .� 24" ._ 24"Max - L". rn Lr, t A 6"Xo'•',N1 4?c W'4 CONTiNUED DECK W co Cc co DECOR.�T:iVF STONE BRICK'it F Yv'RE MESH OR ~ ~ �.� Lz7 a e� t 4 REBAR NO 3 0%'2'C C d r^ ^ c CDR t I EACH`WAY --- - - _ --- v, ^1 ce)N c 00 O X „ X 12 � _ � �n ca X x t° 16" E .4411. u_ U- CD CO 3"THICK CO'�PACTEG o c CO V �. O} Lr ti I cr sA%;,D:rYPICA_ , 4"'1 THICK COY?AC"E� FO:^,1 ER Pt�i LOCAL CODES � 'y w GRAVEL FOR Ay c: c u� v O ADOBE SOtiIO!vLY r 00 3"THICK COMPACTED �1 a cn Ln SAND'1R`2 Cl EAN GRA".0I SANG I7YPICAL j ,.._ CL>_ i SAVC utc"CLEAN::;RAVEL AP.GI;NJ SPA 4"MIN THICK COMPACTED � W z c O a3 C GRAVEL POR CLAY C C � 'F,3r RG�ASS ,ADOBE:SOIL ON-Y s � O L � fi" �— POOL S-E__ L 0 ^, � � db° SAND OR CLEAN GRAVEL W L X Q LL FIBERGLASS O CO �"- U --12" COOL SHELL Go 6-0 M ._ J Rev ewed by c: E L ColumDia.Research&Test:ngM :�� §= L 014Ci Starr Road F O Box 933 O > v W,ndsor CA 95492 �„j . N Phone 707-495-0420 FIG 4 IAS and.CCIES Approved Testing Laboratory TYPICAL ABOVE GROUND SeaiCO INSTALLATION � �_ V POOLS 12'WIDE AND UNDER) coc) MAXIMUM 19 1;2" DPT ONAL ^-- MOi,,,O 0:R? 1J000 DECK f ,, AROtjNC OO ` f APPROX 6' �"' - , �, page �'. (,j x Z `\ , W ! �' Ile f , 6" r < �.. �- - of 9 E m z a� 38' 0 35' 40 a -Z2' r r- r-- _d� r 15-1C w I fl r to 3-6J W 3-6"3'----- --- 7 f, CD ---=— - - 4-6 I Barcelona- BAR 0 � 18,500 gal approx. ASTORIA- FRX AXIOM -CRUJ Z AR U BA- ARU 11,600 ga approx 5.600 Gal Approx ' 5,200 Ga' Approx ' 36 35 29-8 26 ED Lcf 4 ,w r r i 3-6 6 e 1 3'-6 # D 0 BAY ISLE - BHBY BERMUDA-AL CAMBRIDGE- LN CANCUN-CC a approx 18,0 000 7 00 gal approx 14 000 gal approx. rn 10,000 Gal Approx 9 U +� p L C: oItz 35' - �0' � � O I CD r _ 1 CN Cn s N' oo G r 1 1-- w q�p I w 3-6" Q r ^1 v 1 { �.J �✓ a� o v ir, O cn cccn c m c # I . x x 3' 4,-3,t T-6" Em .� cv 'L o T CD Cn CHESAPEAKE-CP Z00 ` CANCUN DELUXE- CCX CARIBBEAN - MR CARMEL- FF 10,50o gal approx •= �; CD a 17,000 ga! approx 12,000 gal approx •— C � 11,500 gal approx. ICU 0 t Q o C,) o o Z O a) Q 25 = LL. c r E a- L 33 s a a 20 ___ a # � L > XQti � O U m o `v � 3 vi � r r t � i I r Model Girrent'y under review and r:ot on the ICC ESR-2014 Report '1�} 4-a w _� m 7' c CU — a) 3`-5" 4 Cz W r Q CD CORINTHIAN 12- RT12 Cape Cod -:.- m U CLAREMONT-V CLEARWATER SP 5 100 gal approx. 11,700 Gal Approx. 9 pp '— 34' r 30' 40 `t Page r 5t tk. is 7 , rn t 4 Z Model curzer,tr under review and not on the ICC ESR-2014 Report _ --------------- Of 9 CCORINTHIAN 16- RT16 CORONADO - BHBI `° CCORINTHIAN 14- RT14 13,000 Gal.Approx Z 8.ZOG gal approx 15 400 Gal.Approx ii i ti 26' - 26' - j 25-5'IL (y rV C r X .................... 51-811 D) W 3-6" LiJ 4'-1„ �. f . _ FiJi - FJI � ECLIPSE - CRU EMPRESS FR12 Z DELRAY_ B IVI 7,600 gal approx 12,000 gal.approx E 8 100 gal approx 5 30C ga' approx 40'-2" 30 25'-V 32-7 11 QL INN :6 t ap It 6,_4„ ° FREEPORT-FP GEMINI -TGEM GENESIS -TGEN ' C. FORTITUDE -CRSBL 9,000 gall approx 4-4approx 20,000 gal approx. V . 6 000al.aos4-4 — 11.300 gal approx g •p 0 C) c r T34'-8" N � 39'-7 � 24' (n W c%4 1 r- sr O •- ti � Lc -- -' q' t!; A c �` U �-- W � m a ir) r I ''nn `•� co Ln r; � I 1 „ � VJ � � O � x o 0 x f f I l 3'-2" 0 :n X x I E r O 3'-9" EOC Qm �i; 3'-7' Ict L o �- 3'-5' m cw) JAMAICA- LD Z v � �' r ac f HELIOS -THEL ao 3 750 gal approx .� 0 1 G �c7 � ° GULF COAST- GC GULF SHORES-GS 7 500 gal.approx. � •- � , In � L -- 15.000 gal approx Cu v C)= `�' 19.600 gal aoprox cc >, 0 Q� Z o c o 38 � :r cr. - a.c p o t E z6-s —25'-T 0 c: m > a a. -J ILL 0 �-- J cc L 0 _ > cu a3 ! i 3';6" W i 3-6 5 1 G 5-6- 3'-7" l cm r 1 KINGSTON AP JAVA-JV KEY WEST- BFF 17,500 Gal.Approx. Q •- 6,800 Gal Approx 9,000 gal aporox J 33' = 29'-8'' 30' 21 Page 4' i w m 1 f m - f a E t I J � � `� f 3�-'� 0f 9 s It LAKE SHORE-CD a� U LAGUNA-LG 3'_5'. LAGUNA�a DELUXE - LGX 15.000 gal approx. E a,h 10.000 gal approx. g LZ 0 26 I N 30' 1 fi' _ 16' I , r'% O cn o, t— Li cl. 3 4 74' i 3t VV - 3-4„ 4' F— M I LAN-CTL 0 _ MALIBU - CRUD MAUL MTK MAJESTY- FR14 4 400 Gal Approx 2.300 gal approx 2�50 gay.approx 1 1 200 gal approx ' 40' 40 35' 30 I •l, a I 3-6" — J_7" 41 _6" I I NEBULA- CRUL OCEAN BREEZE - OBcn Y MONTEGO- MT 3 000 gal approx 18 900 gal approx 4-1 �..� MONACO-AT 12 400 gal approx 21 000 Ga! Approx w V C) �, 24 ' - � 24-1 30' � >, CV 35 cn W p co �, L � e 117 ao Af! -1 W m cfn Cn- c I IG X I (� °° '`t 1 ,31-611 3 T-T' 0 XX � 1-911 31-6" E cn m -- SIRIUS - CRSBM C Z m Q OLYMPIA- FR1 fi PICASSO -TPIC ROCKPORT- RP ' �^ 10.000 al a rox 12 800 gal approx 6.700 ga! approx •� m 15.250 gal approx 9 PP •— .cc G O (h O CO CD c 0 W Z 0r C OO 0 � L L O m 2 t a n X Q U- m •'-' V - `� _�— vn (� - _ m m coCa : E s mecum CIOEr Q ._.J > N J a- w � co � V 0 � — Page r t r r z W ai J =�• of 9 E m z LL ........+.�.....�--.-r•�c r•,�r'•^�'s>-L-'^^---.'--•R-•-�--;-z-�:_'�„'"�,.=tir+�.v�'°"�".'��..=�' ".:c'y.�s-- �y....�...a.�>+.s n --- --- -"ti __ - t•.. _ :�� "-�'.-.."^a^J'!TY7"=^'"a'-:1 r7"...CZ.J-"�"'.o^c..�'^;;74��C�:�•-n--+-y'^'^_.4;i•"^""q-'.!.'.•"�..•=✓^.::!-:' . ............. _�.�•�'Y.b�^S:."Tie_�.'��y�„3't':.ri.-:roo.�.•. �� _._-__._.---- .";.�•.-•------•- ----_._ - '`• .-_�._�. __.__. 1 tom•_"-_^ :i 1 1 4 1 !f ���. , :l�� ,, V , _� >i,(\ i •\•~tom. �`(+ ` ( '-' Ijry� �•�,:� r. j 1, i ''{+ .-.. � i t `�''y'\`t��r� Y V__'^•-�._ /�`��/ f S ' i1 '•�' ..__-...__.-5.r--�-`� ',;s-�j:+. ,'C�Y �..:,mot t�;'-C•y.•!v.jy�}:. •''i. .. .~:F: �:Y - ..- - � :_ _� i 7.1 Lij T. j^1 1�t` F I V .:`��:�L._E R 1`.! 1"f ,'�•, `..�_.:a '"''i r i • j � � 7 %• i�l 4 i i : 1 W C / y}--Q7 17`[�4 ,�I.1 lLEN-J -/ S A �t 1y�..: i-?•-' Y/•1 i �/l`�t��i.tlt�T TS`1�� ;• -.r,rt��i :r y, F �.j cal ao�)rox. ( y J ' i r. i 11 c r� ,YJ i ; ` ~ • = ui cz j a t i LLrr i 4 CIOEll i L L W z ; � � -� V '3: CG CO `L Q j Go i cz > Page �i �• 1 of g , 2� t - �•1 - aG 12,-1. E 7-9' 9-8' 9-8' 7' ---- a ' I T I 7'-8' 9'-8" 7-8 j I 7F C!) LU 3-4 4 J 3 3- 3 �— l O I Z ' 2{_11 J ! _ � -TMRD - PLACID -BOS REGAL- RG ROYAL -RY SHASTA- LRS SUPERIOR -C R MERIDIAN MYSTIC M r 675 gal approx 550 Gal, Aoprox 475 Gal Approx 600 Gal Approx 600 Gal Approx 420 Gay Approx 700 Gay Approx o C ' J cl I a C > 7'-10' � 8" _ -1:. 9'-8" 9 8. � _ a c L t0 3 0 cn c c E I — U +� O r 3' 3' I_j c: 0 0 3'-4 3 -- - ,... D 0. O SW SUPERIOR SPILLWAY-CSSW p i REGAL SPILLWAY- RGSW ROYAL SPILLWAY- RSW SHASTA SPILLWAY LRS }� _ 0 04 MYSIC SPILLWAY- MSW PLACID SPILLWAY- BOSS 11* W 600 Gal Approx 600 Gal Approx 420 Gal Approx 700 Gal Approx CIS ti c cn 475 Gal Approx E 1 c; co 550 Ga Approx �—' w cz cn (n �— o p ccn c> coo ^ xcIO C � -� `01 � E = 0s c Zco % a?�x c ti oL c" w � 00 coo r` ►.. 16,_61, ._ o �, 1 a. c c cc 18,_3,� � -- d �� 10'-7" col cu (1) m Z c as Cc: c - t O t CD � _ El. J 6' 10" X _ cu C) °' Q, O m �-- U �V � m 3 Z7 t!? — 00 } C Cc I O > m aD 10" ..J n N ►J 1�"� HERMOSA-VFTL LARGE PICASSO TANNING LEDGE -TPCLT � W 1� GEMINI TANNING LEDGE -TGEMT GENESIS/SYNERGY SEMI-CIRCLE TANNING LEDGE -TGENT 575 gal approx 200 Gal Approx 560 gay approx � U 550 gal approx. c 16' 15'-8^— -' . 'ram 1,_\'• 8'-4" � � �� '1i! 7.8 �'� �, Page 3 ­Jj 0 Z --- F W _ �,j r�. �' ' ��'. RECTANGLE TANNING LEDGE - RTL SEMI CIRCLE TANNING LEDGE -TSCT of 9 400 Gal Approx. 400 Gal Approx E m Z a i.i s f chi I O I I I r SWIMMING POOH WITHOUT RECiRCJLA T ION N!AiN DKA.NIS I c LLJ --I DEBRIS REMOV.- SYSTEM 3t,CT ON CI.TLE I'S N SER'Ec 2 90 EL.80btiS \V ui 'TENT,COVER MAv :OPT O%AL CEBRiS � BE G; `T ER CRA CONTA%MEN- CAN STER z I i hATER.NE FF TO PjMF r 1= ANTI-VORTEX ., 2NG DRAIN L.00R uRA!h 2-t)DR.ARGER .. 04 'J'(!VENT NE SUCTION OUTLET C RCJ,AT ON L NE s ATIAOSPHER!C VENT PIPE_ENGTH M N MU-V=16 M.AXAlLM-30 18"M'N 24-MAX EXA.MP�_ PIMP �2'0 OR EQUAL-0 •CIRC _ ULA'riON L NE U O�'TO CF`ONAL LNfi.TER FEti-UREIS OR jaa �� o C: �1 V p �t O � N GENERAL NOTES STA%CG NO-ES -EGENU I.SE 2'SCHEOI;:F sC pIPF U) U) `-a R.IS REMOVA_SYSTEM'S T C BE INSTA�-ED %ACCOROANIf E `u DR4 �i- ;RFR c RECOMMENCAT OtiS 2:)o N r USE 9C DEGREE ELSONS C.N SUL'flON SZE _ O v t E OEB `� � a 2 CONTRACTOR OR Tr1.NS`A-L VA!'.t��"."PF.IE�SAC,<JP SYSTEM 3 C�'�.K va_.ES MA'r BE VE�CE�F EOUlPMEtiT!S N MORE rHA.1•$"ABOVE tiAT=R_:NE )` F BcR Or%T C:IG'f' � C?'v- � � '� � t� M s KcI°VA�'•iES h'}SIR 5 T'aE°-IM-1 AtrG•C-?F_TER ` E 3 AU_.PIPING TO BE SCHEDULE 40 PVC BEARING NSF APPROVAL UNLESS::Tr�tk'rl:St til:I C,J � � � � sn.�.tMER 3 MA N DRA.% 0 m ( 4 THE F.'_-OR DRAIN Mcn EETS 7HE REQUIREMENTS OF ANSi�ASME A?'2?9 0-20;7.4N0 Drtf.'v COVERS MEET THE _^ REQUIREMENTS OF ANS;/ASME A'12 19 8-2007 FOR ANT-HAIR A'V►^.BOOY ENTRAPMENT AND ANSiiAPSP'ICC-7 20?s�'�'�Dt►•RG c CV) co ^ T I� SUPPLEMENT CONTRACTOR'S SPECIFICAT':ON DRAINING ON FILE FOR METHODS AND 3•fyq f ya_yc 0O . N � THIS DRAW.NG WILL SUPPLE E > RETURN 00 MATERIALS OF CONSTRUCTION REFER TO CONTRAC`OR S ENGINEERED AND SEALED SPECIFICATION ORAW:NG ON 0 v X PL:.MB!tiG � o � is -- x =!LE WITH 7HE BUILDING DEPARTMENT 2x?74 tv x x 6 ATTACH PLACARD WH CH STATES THAT VENT IS A SWIMMING POOL SAFETY DEV CE AND SHOULD NOT BE TAMPERED WITH sp I"^'dER O cn E CC � L LL' 7 THE MAX,MUM VACUUM WI TH M ONE SOP PLUGGED AND TO RE.EASE A 300Y EN'RAPMEtiT ON THE OTHER SUMP'IY'__NOT EXCEED 4 5 VCHES o c`r: cn OF MERCURY!N 3 SECONDS CD z m c MAX MUM SUCTION P PE VE,OC.TY SIX 1.6)=PS OR 59 GPM ^ � L �^ co 8 � _ co 9 AN APPROVED VACUUM RELEASE SYSTEM SUCH AS THE VAC-ALERT SVRS SVS`EM S AN ALTERNATIVE TO T-iE OTHER SYSTEMS SHOWN a) � ti ' ""r c ^ v 0 ih `V o CL CQ �(1/) Z 0 C c 0 SUGGESTE::D DIE IA;L E d � d � � a J VENT COVER MAY BE GETTER E � '� X Q LL DRAIN SUCH AS HAYWARD � o � _f"- MODE_SP•10'9 Y ku J ��-+ to Reviewed b m m '� E L Ix ANS ASME A"2+9 8M v SLC'10N OU"LE' c / 41AI'v DRAIN*. 2 9Q E_BOWS 'p d o c Jd cu o m (U N ui � �ac 2•r: c ��� T ?2"MiN CL c S 2� aAXIMUM CIS T ANCE Q �O TO'/E'4T TEE ( , c 2'G LONNECr ON- � F.NISHED GRACE S;.CTIGN GL;T_E' � c V > 1MAIN DRAIN 2,L! \ \� Sea _ / 1 cn E At-,sUuT•C,, -%'0 VENTT PIP!.NG 2'0 a v m ,iL�vEN' 0 TJ C v - ' 0 to t ' C > 2) E �, "�7 NOTES Page I` = ALTERNATIVE SUCTION OUTLETS SYSTEM x MAY INCLUDE 1 ON THE BOTTOM AND ONE ON ;PTIONAt-ATMOSPHERIC VENT THE VERTICAL WALL OR ONE EACH ON (' VEN-'C A'MOSPHERE SO VtN' Two(2;SEPARATE VERTICAL WA__S Z vV L:NO]81:BLOCKED By DEBRIS U.1 INSECT INFZS'A_ION OR +AICP V iO..OG!CAL r-ON TAAA NAT O% C f DUAL SUCTION OUTLETS IN PARALLEL WITH OPTIONAL ATMOSPHERIC VENT SYSTEM,, of 9 E LL a b-8£ L060 # '011 '3'd SAN JIHOSln 'S N3HdOlSNHO 100d =10 MIS a3on(Ml anen I £ s}uauaWOO aauue!d a6ell!n aad 6Z/8Z/ti -Z s;u9wwOO aaau!6u3 96e11!n lad 6Z/9 L/Z ' SNOISIn32] � W lz ® 0©1 ZretZ W � mC U Y m L. ccC C } -cc 3 >, ° 0 ca c 3m =c m CD -o oy� Y CD CO a) 3 S o ��°m a i- >+ Z w m a) ca C U O C -O ai a) ca tL3 C V U O > _ _ O i m rr m O a 0 'O m 2 O C C O O a) y D U cm E 0 .v tL0 3 W> O` 00 o m m'c Ea a vi o cams wa p m ca o°�mca°) o CO hoc:3 avim d o c mM ,>,� o _2 Z aci m N p rn O 0 C a3 O 0 a i- Z- E 0 0 y C ca � N 0 a U O v — 0 O a) U L y p 0 s =_ a) C •a a) ca a f° a) a? � - >. cam. a ca �, .. ` > ? m c� �a �15 > me m.,a. Emcao ms E wcn cm cc mcavo -oa LUco E US- �CD . cn ca tm c co cp w cca 0 -0a 02 aa)) c E o o ca o � ca c• � m E m - ca .., c y � y R N � Co a z>, +>> C ta CD 0 � NO a) E 'rIUD cu mcc - ca t&c`N a �ON a�c so0 0 > m m ap m E -0ca C 2 .6 a�i 00 pm m�c� �.. �� U'�00 c c .cam O �a 0 o m ymc=� 0) �W6°c�a`� E aso a? a) 0 m •C 0- C= o'-9 O -p m .0 m _m C m N Y U O ca C (D c o L o?`z'aQm ° E o ° c m E > c o E c m >"m C" _� cm Z- m= �� N� C raa��5 E m +� O m E r 0 3 O N0 `~ o c a O —CO N O tm 0.0 ca O V O V 0 O O �. g y L) L O O L O m O 0 C U C a7 cLpp ca c w C U "- Z U N C �C �— "- �. v) m o N O C. C U_ ca m O L O 0 c m U mm a c v)cc N c� a) m0 c>.mo3. 'a) c>,caoN o occcaam E� 0 oo Z76 ` y U ccalL- aQaoti� cpi �t� aW o y W E�cnl-E- H c V= Q76 Q o p La m O CV C) d' L6 c6 W N LM 4 6 0 N ELSO6 :( N *OOJ9,91(YJo a6e77A aue7 y3Jig96 30N301SM] >i-IIM NVId 31lS 90901 N sure7d a1iy1M anuar�yyded59 7uaui6eue�/ uoi,�ona7suo3 - �a�e�ur�or5' - axis U61SOa fiuia00ul6u3 j!AlO 030d `JIHosin 'S �OHdO1SNHO u�z z "�66 �6z�u�� � CL 0to r I CL c,4 o CJ x 0) W N LO r CD 0 L J CD CD LLJ (? 0 l— �O +j,�O LO LLJ Lr-W �1 P P- T N 0 IX L-6 C\J 0 W LLJ Lij LU _ a .� CE J 1, 1 04,Jee1 'mad > V ) Cr U) O (0 0 - W 0 Z L < +� Lu W I— = .G I ' ..ml U. _WW 0(D(D !: CL <Lli G 0 O O 0 O O W Z W 0 N 00—j 0= Z 0W W n Ld 0 w J 0 0 N M O N N LL. r > O o z 0 w F- z U o (0 0 z 3 3 co jm po m z g 0 p 0 F V 3 c a -i U U Q Ld X z N_ � wa U � h z o= N S2 N W O CL (n N — c� _ 1 - U 5U U zo ec of a a o N K t 2 V 00 m o X i z N Z _= z ®® ®® 0 a z O O z _ = o o m M 0: In 0 0 0 U U W U z a r_n o Z Z I L- U. , U x 06 U- U) L-8£ L060 # '011 '3'd SAN JIHOSln 'S N3HdOlSlHHO SIUGW aOO J99U!DU3 9bBl!!nJ9d I 6Z/9L/Z "6 SNOISIA3N £L506 �f N *00ig alfyjo a6g77m a11g7 440!�g96 30NMISMA )illM NV -Id RDV�13AOO snolA�:OdWI aNV 3dOlS d331S 0 LU - w U Q il r... 72 ia. few !. -t ii ,, 4I aE*md". ... L X 2 t: `r v 00 . _J LLI -> - J' —' 0 c- Z -j w W / j�p s 0- CY_ r` \ 3 90901,4N surg7d a7iy� 9)W/MVydg�y r 0 JURM9gugtyuoi7�n�7s�o,� - �arer�ui�o7S - a7is N co u61saa Buij99ui6u3 liniC N N LL L w !p j O '3'd JIHosin S �J3HdO1SI�IHO � Z N Z � o Z U Q = co 0 U) in(n o w g NS X m a LL OW M > ER s£"L£L if) — co N a N 3 «00,99 9L S W 0 >� W � � 0 1' LL Q U 0 44 a cn �co p to W co O11 Q a a co_— 9 l? m r` Z _Ow El: w MUQ U �O co w� Oa a _M w UZ O65 cc U aw3 w rr O U. w a cq Z Q Z H w 0 Z W W J Z a 3 to z w g o O O O U a v 9 F: ee i y� 3 t3 S c a of w >> 15 m a z L o U U Q O Q :3 LLI x O P m N U N j W w 0. z p � o N U Z 4 L, t ' W iFn V 5 U W. z O N K O G U m OR In w op U Q U a p I I j (zm <n w 3 N >> o 0 o o o w Z ~z ~z ° w w X w wz O O z O w to, Z w Z w Za 1 a aw ul w 6 2 N g I 1 � f Z o � �0Waw§0 to fll ® 0 ® ®® O z O LL Q O ui j Q z0w OQ Z z J Z CO Z LLJ cr- D z W t UZ Lr_ w 0 Z r, �ry 3 V N