HomeMy WebLinkAbout08.31.2021 HDR Noise Monitoring Memo
1 | P a g e
Memo
Date: August 31, 2021
Project: 900 King Street Redevelopment Project
To: Village of Rye Brook Board of Trustees
From: HDR: Noemi Castillo and Ronald Ying
Subject: Construction Continuous Noise Monitoring Options
Introduction
At the request of the Village of Rye Brook (Village), Henningson Durham & Richardson
Architecture and Engineering, PC (HDR) prepared this follow-up memorandum based on
discussions held at the August 10th Village Board of Trustees meeting to further examine
continuous noise monitoring along the western property boundary during construction of the
property located at 900 King Street (Site). HDR has familiarity with operating noise monitors and
reviewing noise monitoring data on construction projects.
This memorandum summarizes the construction noise monitoring and reporting options available
for continuous noise monitoring at one or more of the noise-sensitive receptors located adjacent
to the Site for the approximately 30 months construction duration. If required by the Village,
continuous noise monitoring would be performed to ensure noise mitigation measures identified
in the Construction Management Plan (CMP) are effective and preset noise level thresholds are
not exceeded during construction.
Any final decisions on the construction continuous noise monitoring will need to be added to the
900 King Street Redevelopment Project CMP prior to the start of demolition and construction
activities, including:
• The selected continuous noise monitoring location(s), considered to be permanent during
the duration of construction, including placement of the monitoring equipment (i.e., utility
pole, semi-permanent contractor installed location)
• The power source for the selected continuous noise monitoring system (e.g., grid power
or solar with battery)
• Logistics regarding property access to install and operate the monitor, including access to
download date and maintain monitor and power source, as needed.
• Security and protection of the continuous noise monitoring system.
• The continuous noise monitoring thresholds for the hourly noise measurements (e.g.,
greater than 65 dBA) and instantaneous noise measurements.
• Responsibility for maintaining the continuous noise monitoring system, including
downloading data, annual calibrations, and, if applicable, battery replacement.
• Communication process, including who will receiver alerts from the noise monitoring
system.
2 | P a g e
• Investigating and reporting exceedances of the noise monitoring thresholds.
• Data reporting method and frequency (e.g., monthly or quarterly memorandums
summarizing the data and any incidents)
Overview
The noise monitoring systems discussed in this memorandum were evaluated based on the
following criteria:
• Logistics
• Meter Functionality
• Labor and Cost Implication
This memorandum provides a summary of the following two noise monitoring systems:
1. Sigicom Option
2. Larson Davis Option
Costs for both noise monitoring systems are provided based on obtaining one unit for continuous
noise monitoring along the western property boundary near the Arbors Condos, or obtaining three
units for continuous noise monitoring near the three noise-sensitive receptors located adjacent to
the Site, including the Arbors Condos to the west; the Village Hall, Police Department, and Fire
Department to the east; and Blind Brook High School to the south. Where possible, AC power
should be used to power the monitoring equipment and avoid disruptions in the noise monitoring
due to a power loss. If AC power is not available, a solar panel and batteries for power storage
would be used to power the noise monitoring system.
Regardless of the option selected, if the Village decides to move forward with continuous noise
monitoring during construction, the selected noise monitoring system should be installed and in
operation at a minimum one week prior to the commencement of demolition and construction for
the purpose of obtaining one week of existing (background) noise levels at the monitoring
location(s). This data would be used to develop appropriate hourly baseline noise levels for
daytime (7 AM to 10 PM) and nighttime (10 PM to 7 AM) hours at the monitoring location(s) for
comparison during construction as needed. It should be noted that this background noise
monitoring at the selected continuous noise monitoring location(s) is considered to be in addition
to the baseline noise monitoring recommended in the Village of Rye Brook Report and
Recommendations on the Site Plan Application, approved on June 24, 2021. The baseline noise
monitoring recommended in the June 2021 Village of Rye Brook Report and Recommendations
on the Site Plan Application should be performed at all of the Final Environmental Impact
Statement (FEIS) noise-sensitive receptors.
Noise Fundamentals
Noise is often described as unwanted sound. The subjective perception of noise is affected by
several physical characteristics:
• Actual level of the sound (perceived loudness);
• Distribution of sound energy among individual frequency bands in the audible range;
3 | P a g e
• Duration of exposure to the sound; and
• Changes or fluctuations in the sound levels during the period of exposure.
The human ear does not perceive all sound frequencies equally well. Therefore, measured
sound levels are adjusted or weighted to more closely correspond to human hearing. A-
weighted sound decibel levels (dB(A)) most closely duplicate human perception of noise.
As very few noises are constant, metrics have been developed to describe varying noise levels
over extended periods of time. A commonly used metric is the equivalent-average sound level
(Leq). The Leq represents a constant sound level that conveys the same sound energy as the
actual fluctuating sound in a given time period. The recommended descriptor for determining
noise compliance of a proposed project with regards to existing noise-sensitive receptors is the
Leq(1) descriptor, which refers to the noise level in a one-hour period. Other typical noise
descriptors include the Lmax, which indicates the maximum noise level during a monitoring
period, and Lmin, which indicates the quietest noise level during a monitoring period.
Sigicom Option
The Sigicom option utilizes a Type I INFRA S50 Sound Level Meter to continuously measure
the instantaneous sound pressure levels (Lmax) and hourly noise level (Leq(1)). The noise data
would be logged in an INFRA Micro 4030 data logger, and data would be transferred real-time
to the cloud via Sigicom’s INFRA Net system. This section discusses the Sigicom option based
on logistics, functionality, and cost.
Logistics
A typical setup for the Sigicom option is shown in Attachment A. The INFRA Micro 4030 data
logger and the lead-acid battery power supply are housed in a grey pelican case with a solar
panel cover. The solar panel would charge the battery. The sound level meter and the
microphone are located to the right of the pelican case housing. The sound level meter is
connected to the data logger via a cable. The data logger can also be connected to an
accelerometer on the ground to measure vibration should the need arise.
This setup can conduct noise monitoring continuously, assuming the case is not located under a
shade. The meter can be connected to a power outlet or a larger solar panel at grade to ensure
continuous measurement in an area with insufficient sunlight. The meter can also alert the
Village if the battery level drops under 25 percent so that a new power source can be provided,
such as a battery replacement.
The sound level meter and data logger set up can be vertically mounted to a pole as shown in
the figure or placed on the ground. If mounted to a utility pole, coordination with the utility
company would be required. The system can also be mounted on a shorter pole with an in-
ground concrete base that would be installed by the contractor at the Village’s request. The
vertical mounting option is preferred to avoid monitoring disruptions.
The sound level meter would need to undergo an annual calibration to ensure accuracy. The
calibration typically takes two weeks. A rental arrangement would need to be set up with
Sigicom for the rental of an additional meter for the duration of the annual calibration.
4 | P a g e
Functionality
This setup would conduct continuous noise monitoring for the 30 months duration using the
setup described above. The noise level data and audio recordings would be automatically
transferred real-time to the cloud-based INFRA Net software. The data can only be accessed by
people who have a user account. The INFRA Net system can also be used to manage
notification settings and create customized data reports. Meter and data logging settings can
also be changed remotely using INFRA Net.
If an instantaneous (Lmax) threshold is exceeded during the monitoring, the meter would record
the event and can send out a text and email alert to the Village and/or its consultant, as well as
the others, such as the construction team. This option allows the exceedance to be immediately
reviewed to decipher whether a construction activity or other event, such as a police siren,
generated the exceedance. The Sigicom system also provides the ability to review the duration
of noise exceedance in the cloud-based INFRA Net platform.
Based on the hourly noise data available in the INFRA Net, the Village and/or its consultant can
develop procedures if the hourly noise level (Leq(1)) exceeds the thresholds; The Village and/or
its consultant can determine if additional noise mitigation measures need to be implemented
during the construction.
Cost
The cost to purchase and operate the Sigicom hardware with INFRA Net subscription for the 30-
month construction period is estimated at $16,240 for one unit or $48,720 for three units.
Additional details on these estimates are provided in Attachment A.
According to the vendor, field calibration is not required to maintain an accurate noise reading if
the annual calibration is carried out. As such, labor costs, which are not included in the costs
presented above, would be incurred during the initial installation and the annual calibration
period. Additional labor costs may be required if sufficient power is not provided to the system
and battery replacements and/or an additional solar panel installation is required. Please note
shipping fees are not included in the estimate.
Larson Davis Option
The Larson Davis option is called NMS 044. The system utilizes a Type I LD 831 C sound level
meter to continuously measure the instantaneous sound pressure levels (Lmax) and hourly noise
levels (Leq(1)). The data would be available in the sound level meter, and a noise technician
would remotely access the noise data in the meter using the Larson Davis’ G4Utility software. If
the Village would like a user interface that can automatically download the data from the Larson
Davis system instead of having a noise analyst remotely downloading data from the meter, an
additional third party system, such as the Greenlight System, can be installed to automatically
transfer the data real-time to a cloud-based user interface or remote server. This section
discusses the Larson Davis option based on logistics, functionality, and cost.
Logistics
A typical setup for the NMS 044 is shown in Attachment B. The LD 831C sound level meter and
the lead-acid battery power supply are housed in a grey pelican case. The meter is typically
5 | P a g e
placed on the ground, and the microphone is located to the right of the pelican case housing.
The microphone with the bird spike is connected to the sound level meter via a cable. The solar
panel is also connected to the NMS 044 system to supply power for continuous monitoring. The
system can also be mounted on a shorter pole with an in-ground concrete base that would be
installed by the contractor at the Village’s request. The vertical mounting option is preferred to
avoid monitoring disruptions.
This setup can conduct noise monitoring continuously, assuming the solar panel is not located
under a shade. In an area with insufficient sunlight, the meter can either be connected to a
power outlet or an additional solar panel to ensure continuous measurement. The meter can
also alert the Village via text and/or email if the battery level drops under a preset percentage so
that a new power source can be provided, such as a battery replacement.
The sound level meter would need to undergo an annual calibration to ensure measurement
accuracy. The calibration typically takes two to three weeks. A rental arrangement would need
to be set up with the Modal Shop for the rental of additional meters for the duration of the annual
calibration.
Functionality
This setup would conduct continuous noise monitoring for the 30 months duration using the
setup described above. If an instantaneous (Lmax) threshold is exceeded during the monitoring,
the NMS 044 system would record the event and can send out a text and email alert to the
Village and/or its consultant, as well as the others, such as the construction team. This option
allows the exceedance to be immediately reviewed to determine the source of noise
exceedance.
Based on the hourly noise data available from the downloaded measurements, the Village
and/or its consultant can develop procedures if the hourly noise level (Leq(1)) exceeds the
thresholds; the Village and/or its consultant can determine if additional noise mitigation
measures need to be implemented during the construction.
The noise levels data and audio recordings would be accessible remotely in the G4Utility
software. The data can only be accessed by the machine that is remotely connected to the
sound level meter. The G4Utility system can change all settings in the sound level meter
remotely and can produce reports that reflect the monitoring data.
Alternatively, there is the potential to relay the data to a remote server using a modem.
However, this would require a third party system, such as the Greenlight System, at an
additional cost.
The NMS system also includes the outdoor preamp, which has a built-in heater and can perform
remote calibration checks. The heater can ensure accurate sound level measurement in a broad
temperature range and prevent condensation. The remote calibration check eliminates the need
for field calibration and can produce more accurate data.
6 | P a g e
Cost
The cost to purchase and operate the Larson Davis NMS 044 system for the 30-month
construction period is estimated at $17,266 for one unit or $51,798 for three units. Additional
details on these estimates are provided in Attachment B.
Labor costs, which are not included in this estimate, would be incurred during initial installation
and annual calibration. Additional labor costs would be incurred to download the data remotely
using the G4Utility software. Alternatively, an add-on system can be added at an additional cost
to automatically upload the data to a cloud-based user interface or remote server. Labor costs
may also be required if sufficient power is not provided to the system and battery replacements
and/or an additional solar panel installation is required. Other fees would include data storage
and shipping.
Conclusion
Both options listed above offer unique selling points. The Sigicom option provides a cloud-based
user interface that streamlines all data reporting and alert needs. The Larson Davis option may
offer more accurate sound level measurements due to its built-in heater in the preamp and its
ability to perform frequent remote calibrations. However, the Larson Davis option would require
an add-on system at an additional cost to automatically upload the data to a cloud-based user
interface or remote server. If communicating sound levels and alerts regularly to the
stakeholders at a lower cost is the Village’s preference, the Sigicom option appears to be more
suitable because it has included with the system a user interface to automatically obtain the
data remotely.
7 | P a g e
ATTACHMENT A - Sigicom Option
Typical Setup
Notes:
Labor costs, which are not included in the costs presented above, would be incurred during the initial installation and
the annual calibration period. Additional labor costs may be required if sufficient power is not provided to the system
and battery replacements and/or an additional solar panel installation is required. Please note shipping fees are not
included in the estimate.
8 | P a g e
ATTACHMENT B – Larson Davis Option
Typical Setup for the NMS 044
Notes:
Labor costs, which are not included in the costs presented above, would be incurred during initial installation and
annual calibration. Additional labor costs would be incurred to download the data remotely using the G4Utility
software. Alternatively, an add-on system can be added at an additional cost to automatically upload the data to a
cloud-based user interface or remote server. Labor costs may also be required if sufficient power is not provided to
the system and battery replacements and/or an additional solar panel installation is required. Other fees would
include data storage and shipping.