Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBP21-074PERMIT # . /- QJ -' 07-7 SECTION J 36, a8 TYPE OF JOB LOCATION OWN �/l3/a/ LOT //oeyoo) o1 — 07 e areSa vo C9 ivy S �?0< i//o oa S .k A 42s INSPECTION RECORD 7S- bA j ic2xi0 (9)y)a35= 04?8:3 lJ�ss= o �AyopD DAT€ �INSP - FOOTING FOUNDATION FRAMING RGH FRAMING INSULATION PLUMBING 0 antz (c Zl RGH PLUMBI,NNG/' . /3&/,LicQIZi �/y GAS LJ Z �D SPRINKLER _ � C. g/edric, kL ELECTRIC L]7 L� AS BUII.T A AM I l W/�iI i�_JW a h RB OTHER APPROVALS BOT Pg rlr aeLg U4 ZBA AS-BUILTIFINAL SURVEY REQUIRED PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTION VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK WESTCHESTER COUNTY, NEW YORK NO. 23-047 Certifirate of ®rrup urp This is to certify that n L l I )O r t� yael // a rkJ of, R Y C B)I-C-K:) )!�-I N 7 , having duly filed an application on Rne i-nbe 20 J,�? requesting a Certificate of Occupancy for the premises known as, , Rye Brook, NY, located in a P5 Zoning District and shown on the most current Tax Map as Section: Block: / Lot: q and having fully complied with the requirements of the Building Code and the Zoning Ordinance under Building Permit No. 74, issued q 20 Q / , such authority and permission is hereby granted to the property owner to lawfully occupy or use said premises or building or part thereof listed under the following New York State Classifications, Use: - , Construction: for the following purposes: 1 re4o)n i nq 1 � Subject to all the privileges, requirements, limitations, and conditions prescribed by law, and subject also to the following: S �Jar� i y-m - (2p Y val res0Ju-fro h L d ahI � 3EP flap,_, Pik rm l Ctp pvfvh2I c la-fed glatX-0 i Amended Sj e �1n1-1 0,pa b✓Q I yeso Iufio a da4eo1 -7La3 a� This certificate does not in any way relieve the owners or any person or persons in possession or control of the premises, building,or any part thereof from obtaining such other permits or licenses as may be prescribed by law for the uses or purposes for which the building or premises is designed or intended. Furthermore, it does not relieve such owners or persons from complying with any lawful order issued with the object of maintaining the premises or building in a safe and lawful condition. No changes or rearrangement in the structural parts of the building or in the exit facilities shall be made,and no enlargement, whether by extending on any side or by increasing in height shall be made,nor Il the b ' ing be moved from one location to another until a permit to accomplish such change has been o me fro a Bu din nsp NEAR 2 7 2023 Acting Building Inspector, Village of Rye Brook: Date: RECEIVED FEB 12 202 i February 11, 2021 APPROVED 6-0 VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICIE RESOLUTION GRANTING SITE PLAN AND WETLAND PERMIT APPROVALS FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 18 HILLANDALE ROAD VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK PLANNING BOARD WHEREAS,Daniel Marks ("Applicant's submitted an application for approval of an Site Plan and Wetland Permit for the construction of an in-ground swimming pool, retaining walls,deck renovations and a pergola (the"Project'D,on a 44,478 square-foot property located in the Village of Rye Brook ("Village'D commonly known as 18 Hillandale Road ("Subject Propert '� and shown on the tax assessment map as Parcel ID 135.28-1-39 on the Town of Rye Tax Map and located in the R-25 Zoning District; and WHEREAS, the Property consists of 44,478 square feet and is developed with a two- story residence with a deck, walkways, driveway and curb cut; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board is the Approval Authority for the Site Plan pursuant to Section 209-1.A(2)(a) of the Village Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board is also the Approval Authority for the Wetland Permit application pursuant to Chapter 245; and WHEREAS, the Project is a Type II Action pursuant to 6 NYCRR 617.5(c)(9) of the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) thereby requiring no environmental review; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board has received and reviewed the following plans and application materials: 1. Short Environmental Assessment Form and EAF Mapper Summary Report dated 12/22/20; 2. Application for Site Plan Approval; 3. Site Plan Submittal Review Checklist; 4. Wetlands Permit Application; 5. Building Permit Check List& Zoning Analysis; 6. An Engineer's Report for Mark Residence dated 12/16/20, prepared by Christopher S. Utschig, P.E.; 7. The following engineering plans generally entitled, "Marks Residence" prepared Christopher S. Utschig, P.E., last revised 1/29/21: a. Sheet 1 of 2, "Site Plan," b. Sheet 2 of 2, "Construction Details;" 1313/074/4841-8286-2811v1 2111121 8. The following architectural plans generally entitled, "Marks Residence" prepared John G. Scarlato,Jr., Architect, dated 11/3/20: a. Sheet A-1, "Deck Elevations," b. Sheet A-2, "Deck Floor Plan, Deck Framing Plan," c. Sheet A-3, "Deck Notes & Details;" 9. The following landscape plans generally entitled, "Marks Residence" prepared Daniel Sherman, RLA, last revised 2/4/21: a. Sheet L-1, "Overall Site Plan & Construction Details," b. Sheet L-2, "Site Plan (Pool)," c. Sheet L-3, "Mitigation Planting;" d. Sheet M-1, "Mitigation Planting (Off-Site)," dated 2/3/21; 10. A Site Survey prepared by Ramsay Land Surveying, LLC dated 11/28/20; and WHEREAS, the Village Planning Consultant, Village Staff and the Planning Board reviewed the information, submitted comments regarding the Project and made recommendations regarding the wetland buffer disturbance and stormwater management; and WHEREAS, on February 11, 2021, the Planning Board opened a public hearing on the Site Plan and Wetland Permit applications and all persons interested were given an opportunity to speak on behalf of or in opposition to said application, and the Planning Board closed the public hearing on February 11, 2021; and WHEREAS, due to public health and safety concerns related to the current COVID- 19 pandemic, the January 14, 2021 and February 11, 2021 meetings of the Planning Board, at which this application was heard,was duly noticed and held via videoconference in accordance with the requirements of the Zoning Code of the Village of Rye Brook and the Governor's Executive Orders which suspend the "in-person" requirements of the NYS Open Meetings Law and provide alternative means by which to conduct public meetings and hearings; and WHEREAS, the total area of disturbance proposed within the wetland buffer is 9,296 square feet necessitating a total mitigation area of 18,592 square feet pursuant to Village Code §245-9.A(3) which requires mitigation of buffer disturbance at a ratio of at least two to one; and WHEREAS, on-site mitigation of the total area of required mitigation is not possible, therefore, off-site mitigation is proposed; and WHEREAS, the Applicant proposes 12,900 square feet of new plantings as on-site mitigation for disturbances to the wetland buffer and the remaining 5,692 square feet of mitigation is proposed to be located off-site; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board has considered the Wetland Permit standards set forth in Village Code §245-8.A and finds that the Applicant proposes sufficient wetland 1313/074/4841-8286-2811v1 2111121 -2- mitigation in compliance with Village Code standards subject to compliance with the conditions set forth herein; and WHEREAS,the Planning Board is fully familiar with the application and the Property. NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that for the reasons stated herein, the Village of Rye Brook Planning Board hereby approves the Site Plan and Wetland Permit applications for the construction of an in-ground swimming pool, retaining walls, deck renovations and a pergola on a 44,478 square-foot property located at 18 Hillandale Road and shown on the tax assessment map as Parcel ID 135.28-1-39 on the Town of Rye Tax Map and located in the R-25 Zoning District, upon the following conditions: 1. Prior to the issuance of a building permit the Applicant shall obtain a Steep Slopes Permit from the Planning Board. 2. Prior to the issuance of a building permit the Applicant shall perform a deep hole percolation test. Results shall be submitted to the Village for review and the test shall be witnessed by the Superintendent of Public Works/Engineering and/or the Village's Consulting Engineer who may, in their sole discretion, direct modifications to the stormwater design, as necessary. 3. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the Applicant shall complete 5,692 square feet of off-site wetland mitigation at the Edgewood Retention Basin at the intersection of Meadowlark Road and Bluebird Ilollow (Parcel ID 135.28-1-42) which mitigation shall include removal of invasive vines, weeds, shrubbery and growth as directed by and to the satisfaction of the Superintendent of Public Works/Engineering or the Village's Planning Consultant. 4. The Wetland Permit shall be valid for a period of one year from the date of this resolution, however, an extension of an original permit may be granted upon written request to the Planning Board by the original permit holder or his/her legal agent at least 90 days prior to the expiration date of the original permit. 5. The written Wetland Permit issued pursuant to this approval shall contain the following conditions pursuant to Section 245-11.13 of the Village of Rye Brook Code: a. Work conducted under a permit shall be open to inspection at any time, including weekends and holidays, by the approval authority, the Advisory Council on Environmental Conservation, the Superintendent of Public Works/Village Engineer or their designated representatives. b. All permits issued under this chapter shall be void and of no effect after one year from the date of issue thereof, unless the work for which the permit was issued has been actually commenced and not been abandoned during that period. In such cases, the applicant may reapply for a permit from the approval authority in accordance with the provisions of this chapter. If the 1313/074/4841-8286-2811 vI 2111121 -3- work for which the permits were issued have commenced within one year from the date of issuance of the permits, such permits may be renewed by the approval authority in accordance with the renewal provisions set forth at §§ 213-12.1) and 245-5.B(7) of the Village Code. c. The permit holder shall provide written notification to the Superintendent of Public Works/Village Engineer of the date on which the regulated activity is to begin at least five business days in advance of such date. d. The approval authority's permit shall be prominently displayed at the project site during the undertaking of any of the activities authorized by the permit. e. The boundaries of the regulated activity and all wetlands and watercourses shall be stated and appropriately marked in the field so as to make the boundaries visible. f. The permits, including all conditions, shall be binding on all successors and assignees of the permit holder. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that no permits shall be issued by the Building Department until the Applicant has paid to the Village all applicable fees and professional review fees incurred in connection with review of this Application. On motion by Mr. Morlino, seconded by Mr. Zahl, Mr. Michal Nowak, Superintendent of Public Works/Engineering, called the roll: MS. DRECHSLER Voting EXCUSED MR. GRZAN Voting AYE MR. MORLINO Voting AYE MS. SCHOEN Voting AYE MR. TARTAGLIA Voting AYE MR. ZAHL Voting AYE CHAIRMAN GOODMAN Voting AYE 1313/074/4841-8286-2811v1 2111121 -4- RECEIVED MAR 12 202 i VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE March 11, 2021 APPROVED 6-0 RESOLUTION GRANTING STEEP SLOPES PERMIT APPROVAL FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 18 HILLANDALE ROAD VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK PLANNING BOARD WHEREAS, Daniel Marks ("Applicant") submitted an application for approval of an Steep Slopes Permit for the construction of an in-ground swimming pool,retaining walls,deck renovations and a pergola (the "Project', on a 44,478 square-foot property located in the Village of Rye Brook("Village's commonly known as 18 Hillandale Road("Subject Property' and shown on the tax assessment map as Parcel ID 135.28-1-39 on the Town of Rye Tax Map and located in the R-25 Zoning District; and WHEREAS, the Property consists of 44,478 square feet and is developed with a two- story residence with a deck,walkways, driveway and curb cut; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board is the Approval Authority for the Steep Slopes Permit pursuant to Chapter 213 of the Village Code; and WHEREAS, the Project is a Type II Action pursuant to 6 NYCRR 617.5(c)(9) of the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) thereby requiring no environmental review; and WHEREAS, on February 11, 2021 the Planning Board granted Site Plan and Wetland Permit Approvals for the Project; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board has received and reviewed the following plans and application materials: 1. Short Environmental Assessment Form and EAF Mapper Summary Report dated 12/22/20; 2. Application for Site Plan Approval; 3. Site Plan Submittal Review Checklist; 4. Wetlands Permit Application; 5. Building Permit Check List& Zoning Analysis; 6. An Engineer's Report for Mark Residence dated 12/16/20, prepared by Christopher S. Utschig, P.E.; 7. The following engineering plans generally entitled, "Marks Residence" prepared Christopher S. Utschig, P.E., last revised 1/29/21: a. Sheet 1 of 2, "Site Plan," b. Sheet 2 of 2, "Construction Details;" 1313/074/4841-8286-2811v1 3112121 8. A plan entitled, "Slope Analysis Plan,"prepared by Christopher S. Utschig,P.E., dated 2/18/21; 9. The following architectural plans generally entitled, "Marks Residence" prepared John G. Scarlato,Jr.,Architect, dated 11/3/20: a. Sheet A-1, "Deck Elevations," b. Sheet A-2, "Deck Floor Plan, Deck Framing Plan," c. Sheet A-3, "Deck Notes & Details;" 10.The following landscape plans generally entitled, "Marks Residence" prepared Daniel Sherman, RLA, last revised 2/4/21: a. Sheet L-1, "Overall Site Plan& Construction Details," b. Sheet L-2, "Site Plan (Pool)," c. Sheet L-3, "Mitigation Planting;" d. Sheet M-1, "Mitigation Planting (Off-Site)," dated 2/3/21; 11. A Site Survey prepared by Ramsay Land Surveying, LLC dated 11/28/20; and WHEREAS, the Village Planning Consultant, Village Staff and the Planning Board reviewed the information, submitted comments regarding the Project and made recommendations regarding the disturbance of steep slopes associated with the proposed retention area required for stormwater management on the Property; and WHEREAS, on March 11, 2021, the Planning Board opened a public hearing on the Site Plan and Wetland Permit applications and all persons interested were given an opportunity to speak on behalf of or in opposition to said application, and the Planning Board closed the public hearing on March 11, 2021; and WHEREAS, due to public health and safety concerns related to the current COVID- 19 pandemic, the March 11, 2021 meeting of the Planning Board, at which this application was heard,was duly noticed and held via videoconference in accordance with the requirements of the Zoning Code of the Village of Rye Brook and the Governor's Executive Orders which suspend the"in-person"requirements of the NYS Open Meetings Law and provide alternative means by which to conduct public meetings and hearings; and WHEREAS,the Planning Board has considered the Steep Slopes Permit standards set forth in Village Code §213-6 and finds that the application to be in compliance; and WHEREAS,the Planning Board is fully familiar with the application and the Property. NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that for the reasons stated herein, the Village of Rye Brook Planning Board hereby approves the Steep Slopes Permit application for the construction of an in-ground swimming pool, retaining walls, deck renovations and a pergola on a 44,478 square-foot property located at 18 Hillandale Road and shown on the tax assessment map as Parcel ID 135.28-1-39 on the Town of Rye Tax Map and located in the R- 25 Zoning District. 1313/074/4841-8286-2811v1 3112121 -2- BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that no permits shall be issued by the Building Department until the Applicant has paid to the Village all applicable fees and professional review fees incurred in connection with review of this Application. On motion by Mr. Morlino, seconded by Mr.Tartaglia,Mr. Michal Nowak,Superintendent of Public Works/Engineering, called the roll: MS. DRECHSLER Voting EXCUSED MR. GRZAN Voting AYE MR. MORLINO Voting AYE MS. SCHOEN Voting AYE MR. TARTAGLIA Voting AYE MR. ZAHL Voting AYE CHAIRMAN GOODMAN Voting AYE 13131074/4841-8286-2811v1 3112121 -3- RECEIVED AUG - 1 2022 July 28, 2022 APPROVED 5-0 VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE RESOLUTION APPLICATION FOR AMENDED SITE PLAN FOR 18 HILLANDALE VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK PLANNING BOARD WHEREAS, Daniel Sherman, RLA, on behalf of property owners Daniel Marks and Yael Marks, submitted an application for approval of an Amended Site Plan for landscaping modifications, pool filter location and fencing on the property located at 18 Hillandale Road in the R-25 Zoning District, Section 135.28, Block 1, Lot 39 as shown on the Town of Rye Tax Assessor's Map ("Property"); and WHEREAS, the Planning Board reviewed the following plans and application materials: 1 Short Environmental Assessment Form and EAF Mapper Summary Report dated 12/22/20; 2. Application for Site Plan Approval; 3. Site Plan Submittal Review Checklist; 4. Application to Amend Approved Plans; 5. The following landscape plans generally entitled, "Marks Residence" prepared Daniel Sherman,RLA, last revised 3/29/22: a. Sheet L-1, "Overall Site Plan& Construction Details," b. Sheet L-2, "Amendment to Mitigation Planting," C. Sheet L-2A,"Amendment to Mitigation Planting(Side Yard Enlargement),"last revised 7/11/22; C. Sheet L-3, "Wall Section," last revised 7/25/22; d. Sheet M-1, "Mitigation Planting;" 6. A Site Survey prepared by Ramsay Land Surveying,LLC dated 11/20/21; 7. Site Plans entitled, "Marks Residence" prepared by Christopher S. Utschig, L.P.E, last revised 7/25/22: a. Sheet 1 of 2, "Site Plan;" b. Sheet 2 of 2, "Construction Details;" 8. Slope Analysis Plan entitled, "Marks Residence" prepared by Christopher S. Utschig, L.P.E, dated 2/18/22. 9. Drainage Areas Map, prepared by Christopher S. Utschig, P.E, dated 7/21/22; 10. Letter from Allison Fausner, Esq, Cuddy& Feder,LLP, dated April 7, 2022; 11. Supplemental Submission Letter from Allison Fausner, Esq., Cuddy & Feder, LLP, dated April 28, 2022; 12. Letter from Daniel Sherman, RLA, dated May 11, 2022; 13. Letter from Yael and Daniel Marks, dated 5/31/2022; 14. Email from Christopher Utschig, LPE, dated 6/9/2022; 15. Letter from Christopher Utschig, L.P.E., dated 6/9/2022; 16. Letter from Christopher Utschig,L.P.E, dated 7/7/2022; 17. Letter from James Natarelli, P.E. Dolph Rotfeld Engineering, dated 7/13/2022; 18. Letter from Christopher Utschig,L.P.E., dated 7/20/2022; 19. Letter from James Natarelli, P.E. Dolph Rotfeld Engineering, dated 7/26/2022; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board is the Approval Authority for the Site Plan pursuant to Section 209-1.A(2)(a) and Section 209-1.B(8) of the Village Code; and WHEREAS,the Project is a Type II Action pursuant to 6 NYCRR 617.5(c)(12) of the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) thereby requiring no environmental review; and WHEREAS,the Village Planning Consultant,Village Engineering Consultant,Village Staff and the Planning Board reviewed the information and submitted comments regarding the application; and WHEREAS, a duly advertised public hearing on the application was opened by the Planning Board on March 10,2022 and continued to May 13,2022,June 9,2022,July 14,2022 and July 28, 2022, at which time all persons interested were given an opportunity to speak on behalf of or in opposition to said application and the Planning Board closed the public hearing on July 28, 2022; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board is familiar with the site and all aspects of the project. NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that for the reasons stated herein, the Village of Rye Brook Planning Board hereby approves the Amended Site Plan listed herein for landscaping modifications, pool filter location and fencing on the property located at 18 Hillandale Road, upon the following conditions: 1. The Planning Board hereby waives the requirement for the submission of a Construction Management Plan pursuant to Village Code §209-2.B. 2. The Applicant shall install a variable speed motor pump.The pump to be installed shall be the Jandy VS ProFlo 1.85 HP pump or an equivalent model that advertises a 40% sound reduction. The pump shall be covered with the sound attenuating pump cover. The cover to be installed shall be the Serene+ L080555 pump cover or equivalent model that provides 75%-90% sound reduction. 3. The fill that has accumulated against the chain link fence between 18 Hillandale and 16 Hillandale shall be immediately removed by the Applicant. All fill that accumulates against the chain link fence between 18 Hillandale and 16 Hillandale shall be removed by the Applicant on a regular basis. 4. The Stormwater Management Standards for the Village of Rye Brook, NY through the NYS DEC MS4 Regulations require ongoing annual inspections to ensure the proper maintenance and operation of stormwater management facilities. Inspections must be conducted by qualified personnel such as a Professional Engineer,Landscape Architect or Trained Inspector. Completed reports must be submitted to the Village of Rye Brook Engineering/Public Works Department by March 31 st of each year. 5. The arborvitaes to be planted in accordance with the landscape plan shall be at least 10 feet tall. 6. The Applicant shall provide an as built survey of the entire property after the work is completed in accordance with the Village Code. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that no permits shall be issued by the Building Department until the Applicant has paid to the Village all applicable fees and professional review fees incurred in connection with review of this Application. On motion by Mr. Grzan, seconded by Ms. Schoen, Superintendent of Public Works/Village Engineer, called the roll: MR. KROM Voting AYE MR. GRZAN Voting AYE MR. MENDELSOHN Voting Excused MR. RETTNER Voting Recused MS. SCHOEN Voting AYE MR. TARTAGLIA Voting AYE CHAIRMAN GOODMAN Voting AYE Cu VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK MAYOR 938 King Street, Rye Brook,N.Y. 10573 ADMINISTRATOR Jason A. Klein (914) 939-0668 Christopher J. Bradbury www.ryebrook.org TRUSTEES ACTING BUILDING& FIRE INSPECTOR Susan R. Epstein Steven E. Fews Stephanie J. Fischer David M. Heiser Salvatore W. Morlino CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE March 27,2023 Daniel Marks&Yael Marks 18 Hillandale Road Rye Brook,New York 10573 Re: 18 Hillandale Road, Rye Brook,New York 10573 Parcel ID#: 135.28-1-39 This document certifies that the work done under Mechanical Permit #21-118 issued on 8/18/2021 for the installation of an under-ground propane tank has been satisfactorily completed. Sincerely, Steven E. Fews Acting Building& Fire Inspector /to V BUILDING DEPARTMENT For office use only: PERMrr# -L j/ VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK ISSUED: DEC 16 2022 1038 KING STREET,RYE BROOK,NEW YORK 10573 DATE: - -ale (914)939-06" FEE: PAID f11I VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK www,ryebrook.ore BUILDING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY,CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE, AND CERTIFICATION OF FINAL COSTS TO BE SUBMITTED ONLY UPON COMPLETION OF ALL NORK, AND PRIOR TO THE FINAL INSPECTION Address: ►U �1�\Oc1�.�Q 1��. Occupancy/Use: -'Yrl Parcel ID#: 135.ZIb - 1- 39 Zone: Owner: Nyys cr�' \ GCct %VS Address: 66 Mkw)ck P.E./R.A. or Contractor: �Yd���o ��� ,rC . Address: /Q8/q��oy/�/g�e�euJ�oc%Q/Id Person in responsible charge: ' .µ k CIcr c to Address: Application is hereby made and submitted to the Building Inspector of the Village of Rye Brook for the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy/Certificate of Compliance for the structure/construction/alteration herein mentioned in accordance with law: STATE OF NEW Y`ORK, COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER as:T&Ia l� \ I~1(FS being duly swom,deposes and says that he/she resides at (Print Nano ol'Applicant) (No.and StrLet) in ( fU0_ ,in the County of _�/�Q 5'c�psx -- --� - ,_-- _ - - -- _._.- to the State of�}T>J�0�,that (C tty:TowN Village) he/she has supervised the work at the location indicated above,and that the actual total cost of the work,including all site improvements, labor,materials,scaffolding,fixed equipment,professional fees,and including the monetary value of any materials and labor which may have been donated gratis was:$ for the construction or alteration of: 1A-WIV)d Deponent further states that he/she has examined the approved plans of the structure/work herein referred to for which a Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance is sought,and that to the best of his/her knowledge and belief,the structure/work has been erected/completed in accordance with the approved plans and any amendments thereto except in so far as variations therefore have been legally authorized,and as erected/completed complies with the laws governing building construction.Deponent further understands that it shall be unlawful for an owner to use or permit the use of any building or premises or part thereof hereafter created,erected,changed,converted or enlarged,wholly or partly,in its use or structure until a Certificate of Occupancy or Certificate of Compliance shall have been duly issued by the Building Inspector as per§250-10.A. of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook. Swom to before me this \ Sworn to before me this b day of-` -�c•,�e� , 20 a] day of Signature of Property Owner Signature of Applicant 1�I-e-I wey--5 b'i'd MG/ks Print Name of Property Owner t Namc of Applicant c .. Notary Pu lic Notary Public SHARI MEULLO Notary Public,State of New York SHARI MEULLO No.OIME6160063 Notary Public,State of New York Qualified In Westchester Coun No.01ME6160063 Commission ExpiresJanuary 29,2 Qualified In Westchester County Commission Expires January 29,20� VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK WESTCHESTER COUNTY, NEW YORK NO: 22-118 Certificate of Occupancy This is to certify that J')O n 1 e l / nark f Yoc-/ Marks of, &pnkl, zsj Y having duly filed an application on T `� 20( requesting a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for the premises known as, mllantllalg Rye Brook,NY, located in a k c�?5 Zoning District and shown on the most current Tax Map as Section: .a Block: / Lot: 139 and having fully complied with the requirements of the Building Code and the Zoning Ordinance under Building Permit No. c 1"074,, issued `- J3 20 c:? , such authority and permission is hereby granted to the property owner to lawfully occupy or use said premises or building or part thereof listed under the following New York State Classifications,Use: -�`Q�f - �Q/f�/��/ Construction: for the following purposes: re- 0-4161 g U)Q 11T Subject to all the privileges, requirements, limitations, and conditions prescribed by law, and subject also to the following: I-Ws TQ�o Will (-:�xpve (3n fAcinber -, aoa a This certificate does not in any way relieve the owners or any person or persons in possession or control of the premises, building,or any part thereof from obtaining such other permits or licenses as may be prescribed by law for the uses or purposes for which the building or premises is designed or intended. Furthermore, it does not relieve such owners or persons from complying with any lawful order issued with the object of maintaining the premises or building in a safe and lawful condition. No changes or rearrangement in the structural parts of the building or in the exit facilities shall be made,and no enlargement, whether by extending on any side or by increasing in he' t all be made,nor shall the building be moved from one location to another until a permit to accomplish such change has b tai Building Inspector. Building Inspector,Village of Rye Brook: Date: AUG 1 7 2022 \�� c D For office use only: D BUILDING DEPARTMENT PERMIT# /-0�7y VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK ISSUED: /3-olJ AUG - 9 2022 1 938 KING STREET,RYE BROOK,NEW PORK 10573 DATE: VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK (914)939-0668 FEE: A PAID$ BUILDING DEf ARTMENT 4 wwyv_rytook.or APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY It shall be unlawful for an owner to use or permit the use of any building or premises or part thereof hereafter created, erected, changed, converted or enlarged, wholly or partly, in its use or structure until a certificate of occupancy shall have been issued by the Building Inspector.g250-10.A.Code of the Village of Rye Brook Address: ` 0 M"L RA Occupancy/Use: Rg5 Parcel ID#: Zone: Owner: \ptk6 VAwc-`S Address: / Contractor: Cads A\0 �00ks t SQo.S T,,tr, Address: Person in responsible charge: Address: Reason for temporary use: 1�1)(VLMeE �Se Estimated date of completion: Application is hereby made and submitted to the Building Inspector of the Village of Rye Brook for the issuance of a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for the structure herein mentioned in accordance with law: STA E 01 NEW YORK, COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER as: S being duly sworn,deposes and says that he/she resides at IIa0AC&e- (Print Name of A Ii ant) (No.and Streetl 1 in Olt* "k , in the County of U� in the State of NJ-P�r4 ,that ty/town/Village) he/she has supem' ed th work performed to date at the location indicated above, for the construction, alteration or repair of: I$ �C1�fr"� 4 Deponent further states that he/she understands that a Certificate of Occupancy must be applied for and obtained upon completion of the above captioned project in accordance with law, and that a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy shall only be valid for a period not to exceed thirty (30)days. Sworn to before me this Sworn to before me this day of W�fi , 20 22 day of , 20 Signa a of Property Owner Signature of Applicant Print Name f,Q Property er Print Name of Applicant Notary Public Notary Public CHRISTOPH J.BRADBURY Notary Public,State of New York No.01 oR6159965 Qualified in Westchester County�,�2 Commission Expires January 29,20� 8/1 212 0 2 1 VILLAG OF R BROOK WESTCHEST COU , NEW YORK '� ;9a2. No: 22-086 Temporarp Certificate of ®ccupaucp 'This is to certify that Dime I ma L5 Y00 mool/- S of, Rye gynok i / y / having duly filed an application on y 4-2 3, 20 0�2 a requesting a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for the premises known as, I 0-rIC[a(e PC)CLC� , Rye Brook, NY, located in a Zoning District and shown on the most current Tax Map as Section: 1,36. Block: f Lot: 3q and having fully complied with the requirements of the Building Code and the Zoning Ordinance under Building Permit No.� )-V7 , issued `�1" o 20 c;2 ( , such authority and permission is hereby granted to the property owner to lawfully occupy or use said premises or building or part thereof listed under the following New York State Classifications,Use: /�_3/ (.JY1 e' ram/ /(d Construction: for the following purposes: J ri -t/1 yau nd Y-e lnit' ?a wa l is Subject to all the privileges, requirements, limitations, and conditions prescribed by law, and subject also to the following: vs -rcl o u)> Ke- o�-7 This certificate does not in any way relieve the owners or any person or persons in possession or control of the premises, building,or any part thereof from obtaining such other permits or licenses as may be prescribed by law for the uses or purposes for which the building or premises is designed or intended. Furthermore, it does not relieve such owners or persons from complying with any lawful order issued with the object of maintaining the premises or building in a safe and lawful condition. No changes or rearrangement in the structural parts of the building or in the exit facilities shall be made, and no enlargement, whether by extending on any side or by increasing in height shall be made,nor shall the building be moved from one location to another until a permit to accomplish such change has be n b i o the Bui ' g Inspector. Building Inspector,Village of Rye Brook: Date: JUN ' 12022 D �/ BUILDING DEPARTMENT For c use only:PERMIT#_ ►- 7y 0VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK ISSUED: MAY 2 3 2022 938 KING STREET,RYE BROOK,NEW YORK 10573 DATE: ��2311 Q- (914)939-0"8 FEE: ► PAtD VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK www.ry o�k_gig BUILDING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY It shall be unlawful for an owner to use or permit the use of any building or premises or part thereof hereafter created, erected, changed, converted or enlarged,wholly or partly, in its use or structure until a certificate off occupancy shall have been issued by the Building Inspector.1250-10.A.Code of the Village of Rye Brost A Address: �����Cx1(�Q� R6 , nn Occupancy/Use: )—FL1M Parcel ID#: Zone: n Owner: 7,6\z\ a 1fnQ` Address: 1% V\'\Vf'40 l d . Contractor: lJ1t d 1% 00'5 $ 5m"S `X . Address: Person in responsible charge: f to C NfX Io Address: Reason for temporary use: 'Soy yyy Poa1 ok Estimated date of completion: Application is hereby made and submitted to the Building Inspector of the Village of Rye Brook for the issuance of a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy for the structure herein mentioned in accordance with law: STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER as: being duly sworn,deposes and says that he/she resides at Print Name of Applicant) (No.and Street) in Kit l ask , in the County o CW-ef in the State of�1 that (Cityrrown/Village) he/she has supervised the work performed to date at the location indicated above, for the construction, alteration or repair of: Or^( j\ & 00` Deponent further states that he/she understands that a Certificate of Occupancy must be applied for and obtained upon completion of the above captioned project in accordance with law, and that a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy shall only be valid for a period not to exceed thirty (30)days. Swom to before me this 3 Sworn to before me this day of , 20Da day of , 20 ( hA^2� Si a e of Property Owner Signature of Applicant '-&"/ oqaf-�s t Name of Property Owner Print Name of Applicant Not Public Notary Public SHARI MEULLO Notary Public,State of New York No.01ME6160063 Qualified in Westchester County Commission Expires January g!12/202 t 13RI�je O �9b2•'�� BUILDING DEPARTMENT BUILDING INSPECTOR ❑ASSISTANT BUILDING INSPECTOR VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK ❑CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER 938 KING STREET • RYE BROOK,NY 10573 (914) 939-0668 FAx (914) 939-5801 www ryebrook.org - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INSPECTION REPORT - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - ADDRESS :— , 1�G ^ DATE. 4`�`� C1J- PERMIT# 077q ISSUED: I-'A 13 NECT: LOCK: LOT:3 0!:� LOCATION: 4 �l to�� f"� (OCCUPANCY: ❑ VIOLATION NOTED THE WORK IS... ACCEPTED ❑ REJECTED/REINSPECTION ❑ SITE INSPECTION REQUIRED ❑ FOOTING ❑ FOOTING DRAINAGE ❑ FOUNDATION ❑ UNDERGROUND PLUMBING NOTES ON INSPECTION: ❑ ROUGH PLUMBING ❑ ROUGH FRAMING ❑ INSULATION ❑ NATURAL GAS r ❑ L.P. GAS CO M�1, �:k c() �? ❑ FUEL TANK ❑ FIRE SPRINKLER ❑ FINAL PLUMBING ❑ CROSS CONNECTION ❑ FINAL ❑ OTHER �ice R,,-, Village of Rye Brook ° 0 Public Works and Engineering Department 4J i��`�J�,v (n w+ O` 938 KING STREET• RYE BROOK,NY 10573 (914)939-0753 FAx(914)939-0242 19812 INSPECTION REPORT Address: ! U1liG/�i�/ r` Date: Name : Location: r- 1 Permit#: Phone: Email: Work being Inspected: Work Inspected is: eep?t Rejected Re-Inspection Required Violation Noted Code Section Code Section: Action Taken Code Section: Action Taken 118 Erosion Sediment Pass Fail Violation 210 Storm Water Pass Fail Violation 135 Refuse Pass Fail Violation 215 Street Sidewalk Pass Fail Violation 213 Steep Slopes Pass Fail Violation 235 Trees Pass Fail Violation 216 Illicit Discharge Pass Fail Violation 245 Wetlands Pass Fail Violation Other: Pass Fail Violation Notes: It/ el Diagram: Signature - � BRC�uk. Village of Rye Brook Public Works and Engineering Department 938 KING STREET•RYE BROOK,NY 10573 (914)939-0753 FAX(914)939-0242 INSPECTION REPORT Address: 7 /f:, . Date: Name: , AL Location: � Permit#: Phone: Email: Work being Inspected: � L��� Work Inspected is: ed Rejected (Re-Inspection Required Violation Noted Code Section--- Code Section: Action Taken Code Section: Action Taken 118 Erosion Sediment Pass Fail Violation 210 Storm Water Pass Fail Violation 135 Refuse Pass Fail Violation 215 Street Sidewalk Pass Fail Violation 213 Steep Slopes Pass Fail Violation 235 Trees Pass Fail Violation 216 Illicit Discharge Pass Fail Violation 245 Wetlands Pass Fail Violation Other: Pass Fail Violation Notes: '/+ter !/Z- AW/11 ll' t- I�Ple�el 1-rxI Diagram: v/( "11s� Signature A�'7 �� 4R°°� Village of Rye Brook Public Works and Engineering Department 938 KING STREET• RYE BROOK,NY 10573 (914)939-0753 Fax(914)939-0242 INSPECTION REPORT Address: Date: 411� c• Name: 'I'rl hwl`- � Location: Permit#: Phone: Email: Work being Inspected: 4^X;:�Cxe,00 �- Work Inspected is: cc t Rejected Re-Inspection Required Violation Noted Code Section Code Section: Action Taken Code Section: Action Taken 118 Erosion Sediment Pass Fail Violation 210 Storm Water Pass Fail Violation 135 Refuse Pass Fail Violation 215 Street Sidewalk Pass Fail Violation 213 Steep Slopes Pass Fail Violation 235 Trees Pass Fail Violation 216 Illicit Discharge Pass Fail Violation 245 Wetlands Pass Fail Violation Other: Pass Fail Violation Notes: Diagram: y�� Ila �0 /y ��' Awl /-05' Signature 4�E 4RO BUILDING DEPARTMENT ❑BUILDING INSPECTOR ASSISTANT BUILDING INSPECTOR VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK ❑CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER 938 KING STREET • RYE BROOK,NY 10573 (914) 939-0668 FAx (914) 939-5801 www ryebrook.or - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INSPECTION REPORT - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ADDRESS V G n `C `,� DATE: ` � '1 -3 1 a D o, PERMIT# (` `T ISSUED: '3 `��ECT: 1 �� LOCK: LOT: � ` LOCATION: 'e G S 0, vC�� ��l CUPANCY• ❑ VIOLATION NOTED THE WORK IS...;u ACCEPTED ❑ REJECTED/RuNSPECTION SITE INSPECTION REQUIRED ❑ FOOTING ❑ FOOTING DRAINAGE ❑ FOUNDATION ❑ UNDERGROUND PLUMBING NOTES ON INSPECTION: ❑ ROUGH PLUMBING ❑ ROUGH FRAMING ❑ INSULATION �1 ❑ NATURAL GAS NQ910 OUn� ❑ L.P. GAS ❑ FUEL TANK i ❑ FIRE SPRINKLER �2 SQy� -R �'C \ 1 rbn Py N S 1 1 Q ❑ FINAL PLUMBING Q� ❑ CROSS CONNECTION OQ yy �a 1 "' ❑ FINAL ❑ OTHER �E BRC�v�• o� �m 1987 BUILDING DEPARTMENT ❑BUILDING INSPECTOR ASSISTANT BUILDING INSPECTOR VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK ❑CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER 938 KING STREET • RYE BROOK,NY 10573 (914) 939-0668 FAX (914) 939-5801 www ryebrook.org - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INSPECTION REPORT - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ADDRESS :— DATE: PERMIT# ISSUED: �ECT: �BLOCK: I LOT LOCATION: OCCUPANCY: ❑ VIOLATION NOTED THE WORK IS... o/ACCEPTED ❑ REJECTED/REINSPECTION ❑ SITE INSPECTION REQUIRED ❑ FOOTING ❑ FOOTING DRAINAGE ❑ FOUNDATION ❑ UNDERGROUND PLUMBING NOTES ON INSPECTION: ❑ ROUGH PLUMBING ❑ ROUGH FRAMING ❑ INSULATION \ �1 ❑ NATURAL GAS ❑ L.P. GAS ❑ FUEL TANK ❑ FIRE SPRINKLER i�dl I �7 ❑ FINAL PLUMBINGu� ❑ CROSS CONNECTION �1 l` NAL OTHER n n 1 ` n \_ „ Q \ QyE BRcb Q�i� ��O•c 1982 BUILDING DEPARTMENT ❑BUILDING INSPECTOR QASSISTANT BUILDING INSPECTOR VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK �❑CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER 938 KING STREET • RYE BROOK,NY 10573 (914) 939-0668 FAx (914) 939-5801 www ryebrook.org - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INSPECTION REPORT - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ADDRESS : ` \ ` ' `\C DA`rE: ' ' � �� PERMIT# (/ ��- D' ISSUED: ` 3 L1 SECT: BLOCK: OT: LOCATION' OCCUPANCY: ❑ VIOLATION NOTED THE WORK IS... ❑ ACCEPTED ❑ REJECTED/REINSPECTION ❑ SITE INSPECTION REQUIRED ❑ FOOTING ❑ FOOTING DRAINAGE ❑ FOUNDATION ❑ UNDERGROUND PLUMBING NOTES ON INSPECTION: ❑ ROUGH PLUMBING ❑ ROUGH FRAMING ❑ INSULATION _ ❑ NATURAL GAS ❑ L.P. GAS ❑ FUEL TANK 1-3 ❑ FIRE SPRINKLER ❑ FINAL PLUMBING ❑ CROSS CONNECTION ❑ FINAL ❑ OTHER �E BRC��, BUILDING DEPARTMENT ❑ U ILDING INSPECTOR 15 ASSISTANT BUILDING INSPECTOR VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK ❑CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER 938 KING STREET • RYE BROOK,NY 10573 (914) 939-0668 FAx (914) 939-5801 www ryebrook.org, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INSPECTION REPORT - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ADDRESS : 1 , u 1� DATE: PERMIT# ' `" ( \ ISSUED: \' `SECT: BLOCK: LOT: LOCATION: �" J�G`�- Y � ' W OCCUPANCY: I�C ❑ VIOLATION NOTED THE WORK IS... ❑ ACCEPTED ❑ -kEJECTED/REINSPECTION ❑ SITE INSPECTION REQUIRED ❑ FOOTING ❑ FOOTING DRAINAGE ❑ FOUNDATION ❑ UNDERGROUND PLUMBING NOTES ON INSPECTION: ❑ ROUGH PLUMBING ❑ ROUGH FRAMING ❑ INSULATION �p \ ❑ NATURAL GAS No �i` C l� C,Gd S t O�J fv -�`� '�� Ju �'1A6oG ❑ FUEL TANK ❑ FIRE SPRINKLER ❑ FINAL PLUMBING ❑ CROSS CONNECTION ❑ FINAL /, 1 \LX, OTHER SC,\ US\cv, a � Village of Rye Brook Public Works and Engineering Department 938 KING STREET• RYE BROOK,NY 10573 (914)939-0753 FAx (914)939-0242 INSPECTION REPORT Address: /� /l di/��l/ Date: Name : �T ��� / Location: Permit#: Phone: Q Email: Work being Inspected: /AAx//`k_/1/"__�5_ Work Inspected is: Accepted R 'ected Re-Inspection Required Violation Noted Code Section Code Section: Action Taken Code Section: Action Taken 118 Erosion Sediment Pass Fail Violation 210 Storm Water Pass Fail Violation 135 Refuse Pass Fail Violation 215 Street Sidewalk Pass Fail Violation 213 Steep Slopes Pass Fail Violation 235 Trees Pass Fail Violation 216 Illicit Discharge Pass Fa' Violation 245 Wetlands Pass Fail Violation Other:/#11A(010/ Pass (9�I Violation Notes: T A Diagram: , /r Signature ro e)4T�;� c/® g " Z BRC�� Village of Rye Brook Public Works and Engineering Department 938 KING STREET•RYE BROOK,NY 10573 1982,-� (914)939-0753 FAx(914)939-0242 INSPECTION REPORT Address: ! L f Date: Name: Location: Permit#: Phone: Email: Work being Inspected: 1 1*"-'7/1 s AL/-_/�'rl4f4fX— Work Inspected is: Accepted e" d Re-Inspection Required Violation Noted Code Section Code Section: Action Taken Code Section: Action Taken 118 Erosion Sediment Pass Fail Violation 210 Storm Water Pass Fail Violation 135 Refuse Pass Fail Violation 215 Street Sidewalk Pass Fail Violation 213 Steep Slopes Pass Fail Violation 235 Trees Pass Fail Violation 216 Illicit Discharge Pass Fail Violation 245 Wetlands Pass Fail Violation Other: Pass Fail Violation Notes: , Diagram: Signature �E BR(�}� O� Zm 19 cu � t7 BUILDING DEPARTMENT UILDING INSPECTOR ASSISTANT BUILDING INSPECTOR VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK ❑CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER 938 KING STREET - RYE BROOK,NY 10573 (914) 939-0668 FAx (914) 939-5801 www rxebrook-org - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INSPECTION REPORT - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ADDRESS : i l_LT-*�t�' �����-- 1 DATE: 46 Z PERMIT# ISSUED: SECT: BLOCK: LOT: LOCATION: 7� L OCCUPANCY: —� ❑ VIOLATION NOTED THE WORK IS... ❑ ACCEPTED ❑ REJECTED/ REINSPECTION ❑ SITE INSPECTION REQUIRED ❑ FOOTING ❑ FOOTING DRAINAGE ❑ FOUNDATION UNDERGROUND PLUMBING NOTES ON INSPECTION: ROUGH PLUMBING ❑ ROUGH FRAMING T ❑ INSULATION 1 [I NATURAL GAS A j L.P. GAS L /' FUEL TANK — ❑ FIRE SPRINKLER ❑ FINAL PLUMBING ❑ CROSS CONNECTION ❑ FINAL ❑ OTHER QyE BRnUk t7 1982• BUILDING DEPARTMENT ❑BUILDING INSPECTOR ❑ASSISTANT BUILDING INSPECTOR VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK ❑CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER 938 KING STREET • RYE BROOK,NY 10573 (914) 939-0668 FAx (914) 939-5801 www ryebrook.org - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INSPECTION REPORT - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - ADDRESS : � `�,kCn 4-n'N DATE: w7 U: \ PERMIT# � ISSUED: SECT: BLOCK: LOT: LOCATION: OCCUPANCY: ❑ VIOLATION NOTED THE WORK IS... ❑ ACCEPTED ❑ REJECTED/REINSPECTION ❑ SITE INSPECTION REQUIRED ❑ FOOTING ❑ FOOTING DRAINAGE ❑ FOUNDATION ❑ UNDERGROUND PLUMBING NOTES ON INSPECTION: ❑ ROUGH PLUMBING ❑ ROUGH FRAMING ❑ INSULATION ❑ NATURAL GAS ❑ L.P. GAS ❑ FUEL TANK ❑ FIRE SPRINKLER ❑ FINAL PLUMBING ❑ CROSS CONNECTION ❑ FINAL ❑ OTHER BR O 2m BUILDING DEPARTMENT ❑BUILDING INSPECTOR .ErASSISTANT BUILDING INSPECTOR VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK ❑CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER 938 KING STREET • RYE BROOK,NY 10573 (914) 939-0668 FAx (914) 939-5801 www.Uebrook.org - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - INSPECTION REPORT - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ADDRESS: ' DATE: 1 PERMIT# � ` ISSUED: �'� SECT: BLOCK: LOT: LOCATION: (k t� \ j�� t (-A Cf(C.XJC � �1�c y L' OCCUPANCY: fl VIOLATION NOTEDj THE WORK IS... ❑ ACCEPTED ❑ REJECTED/REINSPECTION , r, r ❑ SITE INSPECTION c REQUIRED ❑ FOOTING ❑ FOOTING DRAINAGE ❑ FOUNDATION ❑ UNDERGROUND PLUMBING NOTES ON INSPECTION: ❑ ROUGH PLUMBING ❑ ROUGH FRAMING ❑ INSULATION ❑ NATURAL GAS -> �' Sr ❑ L.P.GAS �c�tV2 L I ❑ FUEL TANK ❑ FIRE SPRINKLER ❑ FINAL PLUMBING ❑ CROSS CONNECTION �, c. l� S r ❑ FINAL CJ ❑ OTHER FDA- 7'. 0 1 2020 BUILDING DEPARTMENT D E C E 0 V Lam__ VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK 100 18 KING STREET RYE BRoofc,NY 10573 NOV 12 202U (914)939-0668 FAx(914)939-5801 www.ryebrook.ori! VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK BUILDING DEPARTMENT FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: ^� Approval Date: APR — 9 20 , Permit#NC)/'0 / ; Application# ✓1 Approval Signature: ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD: Disapproved: : Date: MAR 1 7 BOT Approval Date: Case# Chairman: v PB Approval Date ' //;Z Case# Secretary. ZBA Approval Date: Case# b \ Other: Application Fee: Permit Fees: 3 4 EXTERIOR BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION Application dated: L/cqk:20 is hereby made to the Building Inspector of the Village of Rye Brook,NY,for the issuance of a Permit for the construction of build' gs,structures,additions,alterations or for a change in use,as per detailed statement described below. 1. JobAddress: l8 Wl. PLICK'NL:. V-D 2. Parcel ID#: I'5• zz-I—5cl Zone: I Z 5 3. Proposed Improvement(Describe in detail): 2QCJ2X$._Q tLA- (52W Q a JL Q-A '���Cx= 4. Property Owner: 1 >� Address: VFS }ALl nt, L QO Phone# (A14 -115-, i Cell# e-mail &40AIt.•C-4 List All Other Properties Owned in Rye Brook: Applicant:C"4%6-L Address: LA 'aL A�� 1 Cf�qf� Phone#Cyµ{-Q 4-(Dq(lq Cell# (q14 --LSS-0?55 —e-mail �3. Yr �'C .1\CL � c rtect: Address: Phone# Cell# ' e-mail Engineer: CgQt>T(-}{E OC :\ Address: (ot) ZALPAA �Jt., WNr(� T ►1US IJ Phone# Q\LA - _':5C11- qtFz> ) C�# r e-mail General Contractor: , / ��d C�O/S ^ 'S / G q Address: t'�j /"� �� ? �C.�C%�Z /v .(.(.� �JCl7C�/�� �� �d O�� Phone# '7 _j J Cell# e-mail (1) 3/21/19 5. Occupancy;(1-Fam.,2-Fam.,Commercial.,etc...)Pre-construction: - V7nrV-) Post-construction: 6. Area of lot: Square feet: LiL% , LA 1 F) • U Acres: .0 Z 7. Dimensions from proposed building or structure to lot lines: front yard: 13VA rear yard: right side yard: �)5 •-1. left side yard: 41 other: 8. If building is located on a corner lot,which street does it front on: 9. Area of proposed building in square feet: Basement: 151 fl: 2^d fl: 3`d fl: 10. Total Square Footage of the proposed new construction: 11. For additions,total square footage added:Basement: I`fl: 2nd fl: 3rd fl: 12. Total Square Footage of the proposed renovation to the existing structure: 13. N.Y.State Construction Classification: N.Y.State Use Classification: 14. Number of stories: Overall Height: Median Height: 15. Basement to be full,or partial: finished or unfinished: 16. What material is the exterior finish: 17. Roof style;peaked,hip,mansard,shed,etc: Roofing material: 18. What system of heating: 19. If private sewage disposal is necessary,approval by the Westchester County Health Department must be submitted with this application. 20. Will the proposed project require the installation of a new,or an extension/modification to an existing automatic fire suppression system?(Fire Sprinkler,ANSL System,FM-200 System,Type I Hood,etc...) Yes: No:X (if yes,applicant must submit a separate Automatic Fire Suppression System Permit application&1 sets of detailed engineered plans) 21. Will the proposed project disturb 400 sq.ft.or more of land,or create 400 sq. ft.or more of impervious coverage requiring a Stormwater Management Control Permit as per§217 of Village Code? Yes: /,, No: Area: 22. Will the proposed project require a Site Plan Review by the Village Planning Board as per§209 of Village Code? Yes: 9 No: (if yes,applicant must submit a Site Plan Application,&provide detailed drawings) 23. Will the proposed project require a Steep Slopes Permit as per§213 of Village Code Yes: No: (tfyes,you must submit a Site Plan Application,&provide a detailed topographical survey) 24. Is the lot located within 100 ft.of a Wetland as per§245 of Village Code? Yes:_X No: (if yes,the area of wetland and the wetland buffer zone must be properly depicted on the survey&site plan) 25. Is the lot or any portion thereof located in a Flood Plane as per the FIRM Map dated 9/28/07? Yes: No: X (if yes,the area and elevations of the flood plane must be properly depicted on the survey&site plan) 26. Will the proposed project require a Tree Removal Permit as per§235 of Village Code? Yes: No:�l _ (ifyes,applicant must submit a Tree Removal Permit Application) 27. Does the proposed project involve a Home-Occupation as per§250-38 of Village Code? Yes: No: 7% Indicate: TIER I: TIER II: TIER III: (if yes,a Home Occupation Permit Application is required) 28. List all zoning variances granted or denied for the subject property: 29. What is the total estimated cost of construction: S a0- J i cco Note:The estimated cost shall include all site improvements,labor,material,scaffolding,fixed equipment,professional fees,including any material and labor which may be donated gratis.If the f nal cost exceeds the estimated cost,an additional fee will be required prior to issuance of the CIO. 30. Estimated date of completion: ":)L L ZOZI (2) 3121/19 BUILDING DEPARTMENT VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK 938 KING STREET RYE BROOK,NY 10573 (914)939-0668 FAX(914)939-5801 RESIDENTIAL LOT AREA COVERAGE Address: 1 I.11 A 1--ri tz- >zQ Section: 135 •Z 5 Block: k Lot: 3�► PERMITTED COVERAGE RATIOS IN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS (Local Law 3-88) YOUR ZONE AREA IN MAIN ACCESS. DECK ZONE DISTRICT SQ. FEET BLDG. BLDG. MAX. (CHECK) MAX. R-35 35,000 14% 4% 5% R-25 25,000 14% 3.5% 4% R-20 20,000 14% 3.5% 4% R-15 15,000 16% 3.5% 4% R-15A 15,000 12% 3.5% 4% R-12 12,500 17% 4% 4% R-10 10,000 20% 4.5% 3.5% R-7 7,500 23% 4.5% 3.5% R-5 5,000 30% 5% 3.55/6 R-2F 5,000 30% 5% 3.5% Existing: Proposed: 1. AREA OF LOT LA4,L4-1 Sq. Ft. — Sq. Ft. 2. AREA OF HOUSE a. Coverage of Main Building (Including Attached Garage or Accessory Building) L-k)ZB -Sq. Ft. Sq. Ft. b. Area of 151 Floor Divided By Area of Lot x 100 — % % 3. AREA OF ACCESSORY BUILDING _ (includes Detached Garages,Tool Shed, Playhouses) Sq. Ft. Sq. Ft. a. Coverage of Accessory Building _ Area of Accessory Building Divided By Area of Lot x 100 % % 4. AREA OF DECK (0 H 5 Sq. Ft. Q 111 Sq. Ft. a. Coverage of Deck Area of Deck Divided By Area of Lot x 100 y 5 % 2 •0to % ittest the best of my knowledge and belief,the above information is correct. Architect's Signature (3) 3/21/19 BUILDING DEPARTMENT VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK 938 KING STREET RYE BROOK,NY 10573 (914) 939-0668 Fax (914) 939-5801 IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE RATIOS RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS Address: IQ, "%U-A Q)Auv--, Vx7:) Section: JAS. 7 th Block: I Lot: 3q Zone: R-25 IMPERVIOUS SURFACES (Definition): All buildings, as defined herein, and all areas on the ground or elevated above the ground which are comprised of materials through which water cannot readily flow, including, but not limited to asphalt, concrete, masonry, wood, gravel and clay, and which consist of elements including, but not limited to, court yards, sports courts, swimming pools,patios, sidewalks, ramps, terraces and driveways. TOTAL MAXIMUM PERMITTED MAX. PERMITTED COVERAGE Zoning IMPERVIOUS LOT AREA BY IMPERVIOUS SURFACES District COVERAGE IN FRONT (sq.ft.) For Base Lot For Lot Area YARD(%) Area(sq.ft.)* Over Base R-35 15 Lot Area (%) R-25 20 0 to 4,000 0 55 R-20 30 4,001 to 6,000 2,200 35 6,001 to 12,000 2,900 27 R-15 35 12,001 to 16,000 4,520 26 R-15A 35 16,001 to 20,000 5,560 25 R-12 40 20,001 to 30,000 6,560 24 30,001 to 40,000 8,960 23 R-10 45 40,001 & larger 11,260 22 R-7 40 R-5 30 R2-F 30 `Base Lot Area"is the minimum end of the lot size range in the"Lot Area" column Area of lot: L41-4 , �j7�5 sq.ft. Existing Allowed Proposed Total impervious coverage = —12 10 S .ft. 12 Zyy.q S . ft. q Z?Jq S .ft. Front impervious coverage = % — % i I ttest to a best of my knowledge and belief, the above information is correct. Architect's Signature (4) 3/21/19 BUILDING DEPARTMENT RN ECE E VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK NOV 12 2020 03 938 KING STREET RYE BROOK,NY 10573 (914)939-0668 FAx(914)939-5801 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK www.rvebrook.orQ BUILDING DEPARTMENT AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE VILLAGE CODE &216 • STORM SEWERS AND SANITARY SEWERS THIS AFFIDAVIT MUST BEAR THE NOTARIZED SIGNATURE OF THE LEGAL PROPERTY OWNER AND BE SUBMITTED ALONG WITH ANY BUILDING OR PLUMBING PERMIT APPLICATION. ANY BUILDING OR PLUMBING PERMIT APPLICATION SUBMITTED WITHOUT THIS COMPLETED AND NOTARIZED FORM WILL BE RETURNED TO THE APPLICANT. STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER ) as: X, ZD�Alm M , residing at, k 8 SZD (Print name) (address, hen you Be) being duly sworn, deposes and states that (s)he is the applicant above named, and further states that (s)he is the legal owner of the property to which this Affidavit of Compliance pertains at; I LLf'%-�qL az e-P , Rye Brook,NY. (Joh Addres) Further that all statements contained herein are true, and that to the best of his/her knowledge and belief,that there are no known illegal cross-connections concerning either the storm sewer or sanitary sewer, and further that there are no roof drains, sump pumps, or other prohibited stormwater or groundwater connections or sources of inflow or infiltration of any kind into the sanitary sewer from the subject property in accordance with all State, County and Village Codes. (Signature of Property Owner(s)) (Print Name of Property Owner(s)) Sworn to before me this day of , 20 (Notary Public) (6) 3/21/19 This form must be properly completed & notarized by the Design Professional of record and the Property Owner. Failure to provide this completed form with your permit application will delay the permitting process. ************************************** Notice of Utilization of Truss Type, Pre-Engineered Wood, or Timber Frame Construction. (Title 19 Part 1264& 1265 NYCRR) To: The Building Inspector of the Village of Rye Brook. From: TJ"kA1 a Subject Property: V)C> SBL: i35 •2-19 -IL__�Zone: Please take notice that the subject; ❑ One or Two Family; ❑ Commercial, _ J ❑New Structure ❑ Addition to an Existing Structure ❑ Rehabilitation to an Existing Structure to be constructed or performed at the subject property will utilize; ❑ Truss Type Construction(TT) � C1� ❑ Pre-Engineered Wood Construction(PW) ❑ Timber Construction(TC) in the following location(s); ❑ Floor Framing, including Girders& Beams(F) ❑ Roof Framing(R) ❑ Floor Framing and Roof Framing(FR) Please note that prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy, the subject dwelling or building utilizing truss type, pre-engineered wood, or timber construction must be posted with a Truss Identification Sign, installed in conformance with NYCRR §1264 for Commercial Buildings, and NYCRR§1265 for One&Two Family Dwellings. Sworn to f re me this (1 om to a ore me th'stZ (� of v 0 da f VL_ Si ature of Prop Owner Signature of esign Professional Iri:� 1r Prin Name of Property Owner Print Name of Design Professional Notary Public Notary Public (7) 3.3.20 This application must be properly completed in its entirety by a N.Y. State Registered Architect or N.Y. State Licensed Professional Engineer & signed by those professionals where indicated. It must also include the notarized signature(s) of the legal owner(s) of the subject property, and the applicant of record in the spaces provided. Any application not properly completed in its entirety and/or not properly signed shall be deemed null and void, and will be returned to the applicant. Please note that application fees are non-refundable. STATE OF NEW YORK, C�OL TY OF WESTCI ASTER ) as: �i�'L,�%, tV1f1 E N , being duly sworn, deposes and states that he/she is the applicant above named, (print name of individual signing as the applicant) and further states that (s)he is the legal owner of the property to which this application pertains, or that (s)he is the - L26( MM QOATT� for the legal owner and is duly authorized to make and file this application. (indicate architect,contractor,agent,attorney,etc.) That all statements contained herein are true to the best of his/her knowledge and belief, and that any work performed, or use conducted at the above captioned property will be in conformance with the details as set forth and contained in this application and in any accompanying approved plans and specifications, as well as in accordance with the New York State Uniform Fire Prevention& Building Code,the Code of the Village of Rye Brook and all other applicable laws, ordinances and regulations. By signing this application, the property owner further declares that he/she has inspected the subject property, and that to the best of his/her knowledge there are no roof drains, sump pumps or other prohibited stormwater or groundwater connections or sources of infiltration into the sanitary sewer system on or from the subject property. Sworn to before me this Sworn to before me this V I day of (J , 200 day o� 20 cZ Signature of Property Owner Signathrt<f Applicant DW i! ,y Print Name of Property Owner Print Name of Applicant Notary Public Notary Public (8) 3/21/19 _ BUILDING DEPARTMENT D [ECIEME ;EVISED D VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK INNS 938 KING STREET RYE BRoox,NY 10573 JAN 2 0 2022 (914)939-0668 �P,TED.' www.rvebrook.or VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK BUILDING DEPARTMENT FOR OFFICE LSE ONLI:Approval D / ate: Permit# /-o z Application# .Approval Signature: ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD: Disapproved: Date: BOT Approval Date::? Case# Chairman: PB Approval Date: / 2 Case# Secretary: ZBA Approval Date: Case# Other: Amendment Fee. tQSj9tj Permit Fee: APPLICATION TO AMEND APPROVED PLANS Application dated: is hereby made to the Building Inspector of the Village of Rye Brook,NY,to amend the approved plans associated with an existing open permit,and/or from any prior approvals granted by the approval authority as per detailed statement described below. 1. Job Address: I9) "ILLAL30AlE Izp Existing Permit#:'X Q-7/ 2. Parcel ID#: I3S.28 -1- ?qq Zone: Q-Z S Original Approval Date: 3. Proposed Amendment(Describe in detail): I PjLtD!ZjC E -t Poc - nL-TEZ Lc PTI-r ) 4. Property Owner: T`R Lit E1— Uu J_C% Address: I$ HI LL11WMLS_- 20� INC= PSOMIC Phone#C1 Iy• -115 - 3I to I Cell#_ e-mail l7R►J•MA21CS �,;(G G�h►►�•GO^ Applicant: I nQ1CLS"C_2 AY 0 — Address: LI BYpP -0 rrE t�q ,\IALH P1 LLF� 0-4 I0515 Phone#91H -5,,QLi'C PA9 Cell# e-mail ngr,l.pA�.ISH CCZrMAJ Architect/Engineer: INA,"►CL Pl3 ���� C(�mP►tl.-Co^+n Address: Phone# Cell# e-mail 5. Occupancy; (1-Fam.,2-Fam.,Comm.,etc...)Prior to construction: } -rAr+r\ After construction: I- FPtr,-% 6. Will the proposed amendment require the installation of a new,or an extension/modification to an existing automatic fire suppression system?(Fire Sprinkler,ANSL System,FM-200 System,Type I Hood,etc...)Yes:_No: _)�_(if yes,you must submit a separate Automatic Fire Suppression System Permit application&2 sets of detailed engineered plans) 7. Will the proposed amendment disturb 400 sq.ft.or more of land,or create 400 sq.ft.or re of impervious coverage requiring a Storm water Management Control Permit as per§217 of Village Code?Yes: _No:Z Area: i an 2/202 i BUILDING DEPARTMENT f r VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK rDAX I 938 KING STREET RYE BROOK,NY 1 JUL 6 2022 (914) 939-0668 www.raebrook.m r TMENT FOR Ui-f•1t E. l Sf: it'N(_1 : AUG 2 3 202YP ;; ��' �•�� Application#t Approval r _ Approval ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD: Disapproti ed: - Date: BOT Approval Date: ase# Chairman: - — PB Approval Date: Case# Secretary: -- ZBA Approval Date: Case# -- � Other: Amendment Fee: 2? Permit Fee: APPLICATION TO AMEND APPRO`•ED PLANS Application dated:` pq 7 is hereby made to the Building Inspector of the Village of Rye Brook, NY,to amend the approved plans associated with an, istmg open permit,and/or from any prior approvals granted by the approval authority as per detailed statemnent described below. i. Job Address: 1Qj -I1L.LAI.1i�IL p�� _Existing Permit#: of J' Q 74 2. Parcel ID#: [�5 2$ -1- �q _Zone: S Original Approval Date: 3. Proposed Amendment(Describe in detail): 1 l 1�S(-PiQE. t P1l LZ L�� t .11,. a I t Ynti Y m 21 Cle r 1 r TL- 1T- lTER- r�.i%E ��11►�1�1t--• C�'•1.C�2 (�P1less 4. Property Owner: Address: 18 Nl -1•�11�D�� AD C Beery' Y Phone#CIL4-•'115 - a lb 1 Cell# e-mail DPtL1-MAILK�3 Applicant:, 1EL - V Address: u �ci3 t rE UA Phone#91U - t-1- Cell# e-mail .r��SNC¢�MAJ Lfl�IPS�t� C G�t1.•co-r, Architect/Engineer: t•11�L SHC�ZlY1AI►� Address: Phone# Cell# e-mail 5. Occupancy; (1-Fam.,2-Fam.,Comm.,etc...)Prior to construction: J After construction: i- FArn 6. Will the proposed amendment require the installation of a new,or an extension/modification to an existing automatic fire suppression system?(Fire Sprinkler,ANSL System, FM-200 System,Type I Hood,etc...)Yes:_No:_)�_(if yes,you must submit a separate Automatic Fire Suppression System Permit application&2 sets of detailed engineered plans) 7. Will the proposed amendment disturb 400 sq.ft.or more of land,or create 400 sq.ft.or m9re of impervious coverage requiring a Storm water Management Control Permit as per§217 of Village Code?Yes: —No:r Area: 1 s112/2o21 8. Will the proposed amendment require a Site Plan Review by the Village Planning Board as per§209 of Village Code? Yes:�_No:_(if yes,you must submit a Site Plan Application,&provide detailed drawings) 9. Will the proposed amendment require a Steep Slopes Permit as per§213 of Village Code Yes: _ No: X (if yes,you must submit a Site Plan Application,&provide a detailed topographical survey) 10. Is the lot located within 100 ft of a Wetland as per§245 of Village Code? Yes: A No: (if yes,the area of wetland and the wetland buffer zone must be properly depicted on the survey&site plan) 11. Is the lot or any portion thereof located in a Flood Plane as per the FIRM Map dated 9/28/07? Yes:!No: (if yes,the area and elevations of the flood plane must be properly depicted on the survey&site plan) 12. Will the proposed amendment require a Tree Removal Permit as per§235 of Village Code?Yes:_No:_ CL(ifyes,you must submit a Tree Removal Permit Application) 13. Does the proposed amendment involve a Home-Occupation as per§250-38 of Village Code? Yes:_No:_,&_.If yes,indicate: TIER L—TIER II:_TIER III:__(if yes,a Home Occupation Permit Application is required) 14. Will the proposed amendment result in additional square footage to the building or subject structure, and if so,provide such additional footage here. _ - - -' - --- (Please submit additional Bulk Regulation Application Pages for review) 15. What is the total added cost of the work associated with the amendment: $ (The estimated cost shall include all site improvements,labor,material,scaffolding,fixed equipment,professional fees,including any material and labor which may be donated gratis.) 16. N.Y.State Construction Classification:_ — _ N.Y. State Use Classification: 17. Estimated date of completion ___, iL^p _-------------- ---- ------ — " This application must be properly completed in its entirety by a N.Y. State Registered Architect or N.Y. State Licensed Professional Engineer& signed by those professionals where indicated. It must also include the notarized signature(s) of the legal owner(s) of the subject property, and the applicant of record in the spaces provided.Any application not properly completed in its entirety andior not properly signed shall be deemed null and void, and will be returned to the applicant. Please note that application fees are non-refundable. STATE OF NEW YORK,COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER ) as: � T 1Ri SH E12rnr�J ,being duly sworn,deposes and states that he/she is thet applicant; ove named, (print name of individual signing as the applicant) and further states that (s)he is the legal owner of the�. to which this application pertains, or that (s)he is the for th(rfe—gal owner and is duly authorized to make and file this application. (indicate architect,contractor,agent,attorney,etc.) That all statements contained herein are true to the best of his/her knowledge and belief,and that any work performed,or use conducted at the above captioned property will be in conformance with the details as set forth and contained in this application and in any accompanying approved plans and specifications,as well as in accordance with the New York State Uniform Fire Prevention&Building Code,the Code of the Village of Rye Brook and all other applicable laws,ordinances and regulations. By signing this application,the property owner further declares that he/she has inspected the subject property,and that to the best of his/her knowledge there are no roof drains,stung pumps or other prohibited stormwater or groundwater connections or sources of infiltration into the sanitary sewer system on or from the subject property. �n Sworn to before me this Sworn to before me this C� r day of �'` —• 20 y of 'I1�lGt�L ` , 20 � gnattue o /f Property Owner ---- — tgnature of Applicant I oil LNl tys J J 6z- operty Owner Print Name of Applicant L, Notary lic Notary Public SHAHI MELILLO 2 Hyukjong Lee Notary Public, State of New York State of New Jersey I`10.0,1 wig 6'10�%63 Notary Public - y f 01(alified ir(Westch- ter County, +�= %,� Commission No.50169466 Commission Expires January 29.20 - My Commissbr Expires 8.012026 9/12/2021 _ 01 O = e-1 0 N N o N � C tea ~ c I-W r W O > _ z � �i W ?• o � �-' t cz o o � o = w O W w 9z d LT. fO z rx Q o z 1 oc a w Wa r z 8 � GeG .. A w y s' r r - p [EC ENE BUILV "EPA�MENTVILJE OF RYE OK MAY ' S 2021 938 KINET RYE B "" NY 10573 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK (914) 939-5801 BUILDING DEPARTMENT or ELECTRICAL PERMIT APPLICATION Westchester County Master Electricians License Required Q/ Q FOR OFFICE USE ONLY BP#: J—07Y EP#: �/--/0 / IAA Y 0 `� Q Approval Date: Permit Fee: $ U �� Approval Signature: Other: Disapproved: (fees are non-refundable) Application dated, -15-Oy_Lptl is hereby made to the Building Inspector of the Village of Rye Brook NY,for the issuance of a Permit to install and/or remove electrical equipment, wiring, fixtures ,or to perform other high or low voltage electrical work as per the detailed statement described below. The applicant & property owner, by signing this document agree that all electrical work performed will be in conformance with all applicable Federal,State,County and Local Codes. I.Address: IS Hi`//3 n/4 8)e Rd SBU S-21 [- 3 Zone: Q.w 2.Property Owner: V iin �'/ t ydel lnc?rks Address: I S H T 1I a Yl A a 1 E k�'a Phone#: 9 I4 -115 - 3161 Cell#: email: 3.Master Electrician: 1'1?da' I n K Kosi rb Address: I10 UMShipiorl q plC(i5?h i)ka- ivy Lic.#:�—Phone#:314 M` 26 I I Cell#:`f Ik Q -086-f email:0- .Wi tNdre/e-C ri&0C•Nd1 Company Name: wl lmd r Ekc ri e LI,C Address:I1(9 WdSl ngton pUE PICa5617b l 'WY. 4.Proposed Electrical Work/Fixture Count: W ire jr1groonj Roj 5 li t-S ump . I Pod heafey b o Q-r G F c rec 'lac O Am h n STATE OF NEW YORK,COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER ) as: x m 3 rc i n i Kam;c r b being duly sworn,deposes and states that he/she is the applicant above named,and does further (print name of individual signing as the applicant) I✓1�� state that(s)he is the legal owner of the property to which this application pertains,or that(s)he is the V-i Lt a Yt for the legal owner and is duly authorized to make and file this application. (indicate architect,contractor,agent,attorney,etc.) The undersigned further states that all statements contained herein are true to the best of his/her knowledge and belief,and that any work performed,or use conducted at the above captioned property will be in conformance with the details as set forth and contained in this application and in any accompanying approved plans and specifications,as well as in accordance with the New York State Uniform Fire Prevention&Building Code,the Code of the Village of Rye Brook and all other applicable laws,ordinances and regulations. Sworn to before me this Sworn to before me this day of 120 of Signature of Property Owner Signature of Applicant M412 Or/ Print Name of Property Owner Print Name of Applicant Notary Public Notary Public 3/21/19 Westchester Rockland Electrical Inspection Services, Inc hone: 914-347-3595 F-40 NOT WRITE HERE-FOR OFFICE USE ONLY 43 North Lawn Avenue 3t/ Fax: 9.14-347-3596 Elmsford, NY 10523 sz �\\ /'`)/-/©1 ` BUILDING PERMIT NO. TEMP# 13�7 CITY OR VILLAGE ,/ n ZIP CODE TOWNSHIP COUNTY i ve STREET AND NO.OR POLE NUMBER Ir d t�J BETWEEN WHAT TWO CROSS STREETS IS PREMISES LOCATED? SECTION BLO J• 8 OCCUPANT'S NAME !/del c BUILDING OCCUPANCY OWNER'S NAME AND ADDRESS 1� 4 I`�'r f! IJ� �`j HC}I�E TELEPHONE NUMBER/ CURRENT SUPPLIED BY FROM THEIR d A OFFICE WORK'TELEPHONE NUMBER� LIST BELOW ALL EQUIPMENT WHICH YOU INSTALLED NUMBER OF OUTLETS NO.OF FIXTURES& MOTORS HEATERS OFFICE USE LOCATION LAMP RECEPTACLES ONLY SIDEWALL SWITCH INCADE FLUORE NO. H.P EACH NO. WATTS EACH INSPECTION OUTSIDE BASEMENT 1°T FL 2-FIL M Y ' 5 021 FL 1LD1 REMARKS:LIST OTHER ELECTRICAL DEVICES NOT SET FORTH ABOVE: II,jLU JL)h(I ' Ijoop Il L'ci�US ,7 aJijl ' ' aDo h�� �Y b l o W(?-✓ 'Z 6 Fc1 rccc 13>c)E 66 PmP pahp oo/ boon'l- ff THIS APPLICATION IS INTENDED TO COVER THE ABOVE LISTED ITEMS TO BE INSPECTED.IF AT ANY TIME OF INSPECTION ADDITIONAL ITEMS HAVE BEEN INSTALLED,YOU ARE AUTHORIZED TO MAKE THE INSPECTION AND ADJUST THE FEE FOR THE ADDITIONAL ITEMS INSPECTED AS PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT.THE APPLICANT DECLARES THAT THERE IS NO OPEN APPUCATIONS FOR THE ABOVE WITH ANY OTHER INSPECTION COMPANY WREIS,INC. IS NOT LISTING,LABELING,UNDERWRITING OR CERTIFYING ANY EQUIPMENT, MATERIALS OR DEVICES WHICH ARE PERFORMED BY OTHER CERTIFIED TESTING AGENCIES OR INSPECTION COMPANIES.THE APPLICANT,OWNER,OR AUTHORIZED AGENT AGREES TO ALL THE ABOVE TERMS AND CONDITIONS AS SET FORTH FOR THE APPLICATION. SIZE OF SERVICE FEEDERS CHARACTER OF WORK NEW:] ADDITIONAL I' EXPOSED CONCEALED.] MUST ENTER APPLICANTS IDENTIFICATION NUMBER SERVICE ENTERS BUILDING OVERHEAD UNDERGROUND AVOID DELAYS BY GIVING FULL AND ACCURATE INFORMATION.ALL SPACE MUST BE FILLED IN OR APPLICATION MAY BE RETURNED. NAME OF COMPANY DATE OF APPLICATION SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT E�et LL J X SRrEET ADDREW TELEPHONE NO. tU UP54i/► !cn Ale C/o �2 CRY OR POET OFFICE LP CODE LICENSE NO.WHEN APPLICABLE f� " WESTCHESTER ROCKLAND ELECTRICAL INSPECTION WRE1q1,,R,IC,,J,,- BY THIS CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE THE Westchester Rockland Electrical Inspection Services 43 North Lawn Ave, Elmsford, NY 10523 914-347-3595 (Office) 1 914-347-3596 (Fax) CERTIFIES THAT Upon the application of: Upon premises owned by: Wilmar Electric LLC Daniel &Yael Marks 110 Washington Ave NY, Pleasantville 10570 Located at: 18 Hillandale Rd Rye Brook, NY 10573 Certificate Number: 1030319 Section:135.28 Block: 1 Lot: 39 BDC: Permit Number: EP:21-109-BP:21-074 A visual inspection of the electrical system at this premise described as a Residential occupancy,wherein the premises electrical system consisting of electrical devices and wiring,described below,located in/on the premises at: 18 Hillandale Rd Rye Brook,NY 10573 Basement 1st Floor 2nd Floor 3rd Floor Garage Attic Outside Other: Inspection was conducted in accordance with the NYS and NFPA 70-2017 International Electrical Code and detail of the installation,as set forth below,was found to be in compliance therewith on 08/25/21 Name Type Quantity Pool Lighting Low Voltage ------- 5 Pool Pump 1-50 Hp ------- 5 Pool Heater ------- 1 Pool 1 hp-50hp Motor ------- 1 Pool Receptacle(s)GFCI ------- 2 Pool Panel 60 amp 1 Pool Bonding ------- 1 Switch Single Pole ------- 1 This Certificate has been approved by Westchester Rockland Electrical Inspection Services. This certificate may not be altered in any way. G This certificate is valid for work performed before date of inspection only. a a ■' M 00 N o fV a i N 00 oo in 2: t M t ^ > z W o $ < <1 z O � r Ln � z o\ v "'z � V w A w � ., z � � > o � Z � M W � C*N MM� Cl\ �i �C U 161 w V z w W A z z Na < A u p 8 4i c. U U U w u. O a O C aa W Ln 0.4 x u o w z a 99 x 6 H w z a0 A a w a A a' a �I ca a z as w x p ECEoy1 - ,�� l BUILDING bE 'ARTMENT AUG 1 0 2022 Lo VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK 938 KING STREET RYE BROOK,NY 10573 BUILDING DEPARTMENT (914)939-0668 www ay_ebrook.org ELECTRICAL PERMIT APPLICATION Westchester County Master Electricians License Required FOR OFFICE USE ONLY BP#: 0/—07y EP#: Y3 Approval Date: AUG '1 0 2024V Permit Fee: $ Approval Signature: Other: Disapproved: (fees are non-refundable) Application dated, 8' - 2Z is hereby made to the Building Inspector of the Village of Rye Brook NY,for the issuance of a Permit to install and/or remove electrical equipment,wiring, fixtures,or to perform other high or low voltage electrical work as per the detailed statement described below. The applicant & property owner, by signing this document agree that all electrical work performed will be in conformance with all applicable Federal,State,County and Local Codes. I.Address: It W ABNdal e Rj SBL: j 3 S-28 -I - 39 Zone: 2.Property Owner:baw.-i $ YaO ma rK." Address: Phone#: I 1 k Z2$l( Cell#: email: r 3.Master Electrician: l'1'tdk;jo% 14 434berb Address: U6 Aya35)c;h!Rf6A aL'e Lic.#: 18 41 Phone#: 9(k ?WZ Z8l( Cell#: 8 4,c(o a 64 email: Company Name: ll" '" - Al P Y .i I Address:Il0 (�1 aS�!%tePj C 4.Proposed Electrical Work/FixtureCount: ne�lacp ********************************************************************************************************* STATE OF NEW YORK,,COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER ) as: Ouwcr R K• 1'lQ 61 e'D being duly swom,deposes and states that he/she is the applicant above named,and does further (print name of individual signing as the applicant) r�x��► state that(s)he is the legal owner of the property to which this application pertains,or that(s)he is the u for the legal owner and is duly authorized to make and file this application. (indicate architect,contractor,agent,attorney,etc.) The undersigned fiuther states that all statements contained herein are true to the best of his/her knowledge and belief,and that any work performed,or use conducted at the above captioned property will be in conformance with the details as set forth and contained in this application and in any accompanying approved plans and specifications,as well as in accordance with the New York State Uniform Fire Prevention&Building Code,the Code of the Village of Rye Brook and all other applicable laws,ordinances and regulations. Sworn to before me this Sworn to ore me this day of 120 day of 0 7 Signature of Property Owner Signature of Applicant Print Name of Property Owner ame of ApplicanIN 7 Notary Public Notary Public SHARI MELILLO Notary PUblic,State of New York N6,OIME6160063 Qualified In Westchester County 8/12/2021 CcMMISMetl Eltplres January 29,2023 STATEWIDE • 1:1 Main Street,Fishkill, NY 12524 1 email:• • SWIS JOB APPLICATION 1 914.219.1062 1 SWISNY.corn • • Office Use Elect.Permit# /��� Q� Date Bldg Permit# Utility ID# C� Final Certificate)# City/Village �� U r0 y Zip Township County Address ' (9 H oi/041 d(9l 1 C_r Section i3s. �gBlock Lot Owner Name/Address(if different than above) I / n-�? l/_ Contact Number q) 7'G CL ❑Basement ❑ 1st FI. ❑2nd Fl. ❑3rd FI. ❑More Than 3 Ff. ❑]Garage ❑Attic Outside 1 ff RTesidential ❑Commercial Receptacles Special Recept GFCI AFCI Switches Dimmers Smoke Alarms Carbon Monox Hood Trash Compact Amt Amps Range(s) Cooktop(s) Oven(s) Dishwashers Refrigerator Disposal Microwave Warm Draw Incandescent Fluorescent SERVICE Amperage Voltage 1 P 3P #Meters #Disconnect ❑underground ❑ New ❑Reconnect ❑Overhead ❑ Change ❑Visual Re-Inspection ❑ Safety Re-Inspection ❑ Re-Inspection Additional Information (7 j� U ►„�� A Us 10 2022 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK BUILDING DEPARTMENT This application is valid for one(1)year from the date received by SWIS.This application is intended to cover the above listed items to be inspected,if at any time of inspection additional items han been installed,you are authorized to make the inspection and adjust the fee for the additional items inspected.The applicant declares that there is no open applications for the above address with any other inspection co"gX",The applicant,owner or authorized agent agrees to all the above terms and conditions as set forth for the application. Inspector Date Finalized Inspector# Company Name �/ Ll Date Signature Address v L(/��!!t J JC l OJ/ fi °�/ City/State a,�_ j 1/,V Zip Code �O J License# Z Phone# ' � L State Wide Inspection Services CA—Z) 1080 Main Street Fishkill, NY 12524 Kj U A 845 Phone 914-2194-219-1062 Fax STATE WIDE INSPECTION SERVICES Email: office@swisny.com Service With Integrity Website: www.swisny.com BY THIS CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE STATE WIDE INSPECTION SERVICES CERTIFIES THAT: Upon the application of: Upon Premises Owned by: Wilmar Electric Daniel and Yael Marks 110 Washington Street 18 Hillandale Road Pleasantville, NY 10570 Rye Brook, NY 10573 Located at: 18 Hillandale Road, Rye Brook, NY 10573 Section: Block: Lot: Electrical Permit Number: EP22-183 135.28 � 39 Certificate Number: 2022-4647 Building Permit Number: BP21-074 A visual inspection of the electrical system was conducted at the Residential occupancy described below.The electrical system consisting of electrical devices and wiring is located in/on the premises at: 18 Hillandale Road, Rye Brook, NY 10573 The Exterior was inspected in accordance with the NYS and NFPA 70-2017 and the detail of the installation, as set forth below,was found to be in compliance on the 12th day of August 2022. Name Quantity Rating Circuit Type Replaced & Reconnected Filter Pump for Pool 7' Officer: Frank J. Farina This certificate may not be altered in any way and is validated only by the presence of a seal at the location indicated.This certificate is valid for work performed on the date of inspection only. r i M L f � r t 0�0 0�0 iLi � •• $ � a' L fd n• = �• 4ai 7 = e2 67 ° Cs � � p, � N O a� � ►.. cam W r Y. � y •O ,� o a ■. > C O 14 40 M O// z 0 � �" Q O3 � c � •> v up E'er C g gON m r A ' 3, f O E" Vl Lncc V 9J 38V a, a M M as IX6 M. ww z 8 C :E U Vim $ 1-0 x c.� °' E S _ N �� w RRjjyy �� L1 w '{{711 * •• Q YY W ■•1 ■/ C. S 9 ■ S L L BUILDING DEPARTMENT [E C E Q V E VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK 938 KLNG STREET RYE BROOK,NY 10573 AUG 66 2021 (914)939.-0668 FAx(914)939-5801 VILLAGE OF RYE }vv«'�'.ryebrook.orn BROOK BUILDING DEPARTMENT Aaplication for Permit to Remove, Abandon and/or Install Fuel Storage Tank (*Storage Tanks in excess of 1,100 gallons require registration with the County of Westchester) FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: PERMIT#:J_/PC)/. JP u Approval Date: AUG 1 7 2021 Permit Fee: S ls5pi Approval Signature: Other: Disapproved: EAr; (fces are non-mfundablc) REQUIREMENTS FOR RELEASE OF PERMIT&CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE 1.Application Completed by Bonded,Licensed Contractor. 2. Your contractor's valid proof of liability insurance. (Village of Rye Brook must be listed as certificate holder) 3. Your contractor's valid proof of workers compensation insurance. (Form#C105.2 or Form# U26.3 /or NY State Workers Compensation Waiver) 4.Fee per Tank: Removal,Abandonment, or Installation: " 5. Dig Safely New York#(dial 811): n-PI W— QOa pp 6. Inspection by Building Department for removal/abandonment and/or installation. 7. Submit all Manifests&Reports(after work has been completed). 8. Certificate of Compliance will be provided when all requirements are fulfilled. Application dated, IMP owu ,is hereby made to the Building Inspector of the Village of Rye Brook for a permit to remove,abandon,an or install a Fuel Tank as herein described.The applicant and property owner,by signing this document agree that the subject fuel tank(s)will be removed,abandoned and/or installed in conformance with all applicable Village,County,State& Federal laws,codes,rules and regulations. Indicate Permit Type: Installation e�•Removal( )•Abandonment( )/Above Ground ( )•Buried in GroundA<lj 1. Address: I I I &11 SBL: 135, 9 S- 3Q Zone: J2-02 5 2. Property Owner&Address: ' ` _ Phone#: Cell#: � -7- / I ---email: -nn^" 1� �� -- - . ---- 1� N^ 3. Contractor&Address: ��tJp f r sj'r �1, ,�t s S.1 t�'►d I s t���o.E�. r UU Phone#: �;_ }9=, - 6• _Cell#: Zo) email: �7�r1 4. Applicant: 1 lit 0 S 61,_ /•245�/�rAlAl� s t 6� rA 110 Phone#:�, Z� 7 KV Cell#: 3 �� ' V)�email: 1 1 lint S - ---�--o /1?,LLa�1 G 5. Indicate Fuel Type: Fuel Oil( )•L.P.Gas •Gasoline( )•Other( ): v 6. Number and Capacity of each Tank: 0 N r-- U CJ J.�106 1/4 r i n ul7V ftVaL1A,0 /I 7. Exact Location(s)of each Tank: rL-a 1 A c lr 1 1' _ o F t 6/l/2020 T OF NEW YOR�C,.COUNTY F WESTCHESTER ) as: ,being duly sworn,deposes and states that be/she is the applicant above named, nt name of individual signing as the applicant) and f r state t t(s a is the le al owner of the property to which this application pertains,or that(s)he is the �r4AJA lni-War the legal owner and is duly authorized to make and file this application. (indicate architect,contractor,agent,attorney,etc.) That all statements contained herein are true to the best of his/her knowledge and belief,and that any work performed,or use conducted at the above captioned property will be in conformance with the details as set forth and contained in this application and in any accompanying approved plans and specifications,as well as in accordance with the New York State Uniform Fire Prevention&Building Code,the Code of the Village of Rye Brook and all other applicable laws,ordinances and regulations. Sworn to before me this �`� Sworn to before me this day of �Ik ,20 day of �""�•i)} 20 0- Signat operty Owner Signat a of Applicant i s l �`�Gr�s �• %dy l� SCa�tV Print Name of Property Owner Print Name of Applicant ze�ot ~— ary Public ALEXANDRA H.MARSHALL / O�AtffiW Ic,St of New York Notary Public,State of New York No.O1FR6363711 No.O1FR6363711 Qualified in Westchester County Qualified in Westchester County Commission Expires August 28,20� Commission Expires August 28,20 This application must be properly completed in its entirety and must include the notarized signature(s) of the legal owner(s)of the subject property, and the applicant of record in the spaces provided. Any application not properly completed in its entirety and/or not properly signed shall be deemed null and void and will be returned to the applicant. a 6/1/2020 �Q _o ILp�F� Ow w� 21 , N x :-: o�tmW�azFILE COPY N LU Co Xw o�cu�mOazm °� u wC] C. C� W w�0 of Q ruJZ ZODWO30 a v — t O w r IU� QD d �CZmwgoz >OU oL co a Q 8 J h o o cR Mocadom Driveway 1 < o �c m i s _ Q o cn E p N 8 7 4 3 19 J _ ; O _ h P 1�AIT A �)l = 8 0 a D APPRO AUG OU DING IN8PE OR, ilage W Ryo Brack NY 0 Q V;N 4a O P r, SITE PLAN DETAIL - Daniel Marks 18 Hillandale Road Rye �l AUG 16 2021 ..� �._ .....� VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK BUILDING DEPARTMENT N story �� 500 Gallon UG Tank +10' from House +15' from Side Yard Property Line Quality Steel Corporation UG Propane Tanks (F ALL LE h-IH 17 � J } 0,'EB.A LL J ' HEI,HT S ' J %J APPROXIMATE UNDERGROUND VESSEL DIMENSIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS WATER DIAMETER HEAD OVERALL OVERALL HEIGHT LEG— WEIGHT "'QUANTITY CAPACITY (OD) TYPE LENGTH UGSR UGLR WIDTH (Ibs) E u_L LOAD PEi!STACK 120 wp,, 24" Elhp S'8" 3 1.0` 4'-5" V 1 1/2" 260 108 t 96 16 250w 30" Helm, 7' 10' 4,6" 5'`1" 1'-5" 430 54 9 320 wrg. 30" Henri. 9`7 416 5'1" 1,5" --c"0 45 9 50gw . 331j2" Heml. 10' 5` 5 7' 1,8 450 8 ' 6 P ktwa 41" Harm if; 4' S 7f'" t' R" 1 17 i 14 A e S r s � (V N N 0�0 0�0 O pi OC Owl si i Ow Wj a d0 i.r '3 u'7 o w � a Q Q � _ o � o , � w f 0. O Z m U O �.L OC N U ✓ Z M Im N 06 J er w z F 0 oG Z z e "rZr" V a 00z in 'a ° < s a • BUILDING DEPARTMENT R C I �w[E VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK ID 938 KING STREET RYE BROOK,NY 10573 AUG 1 3 202� (914)939-0668FAX(914)939-5801 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK www.rytkook.org BUILDING DEPARTMENT PLUMBING PERMIT APPLICATION FOR OFFICE USE ONLY o��— Q 7 7 PP#: /3 40 Approval Date: 17� ^L Permit Fee: $ J '- /� Approval Signature: Other: Disapproved: ################# ### ############# ###################################a#(fees *a###e####able)########## Application dated. 3 a1 is hereby made to the Building Inspector of the Village of Rye Brook NY, for the issuance of a Permit to install an or remove Plumbing as per detailed statement described below.The applicant & properly owner,b signing document agree(that said Plumbing work will be in conformance with all applicable Federal,State,County and Local Codes. this 1.Address: _ U !��1�1P (,�� lo(J SBL: J i vla �—3 / Zone: 2.Proposed Work: I dUl� GPI 3.Property Owner:_ �,P,� K S Address: Z R /%• Phone#: _ y� / I -Z Cell #: _.email: 4.Master Plumber: Y`-�;GV` Q.Q �, �, Address: i 2l� Lic.p: 3 Phone#: -7-L S• kkl u '3 Cell#: 20 email:�•�rJ��l�-, /jam �9io// ,� Company Name: / , C Address: � � a.r',a/J/,-� v �O �C INDICATE FIXTURES& LINES TO BE INSTALLED AS PER THE FOLLOWING SCHEDULE: Location Water Urinals Drinking Sinks I Showers Bath Lauadr - --ic— _ Closets eta Y > St Fine Sanitary Natural/ Other* Total Basement Tubs Tubs Service Service Sewer LP Gas 1st Floor 2nd Floor and Floor 41 Floor 56 Floor Exterior 5.* List Other Equipment/Provide Details: (Notarized Signatures Required Next 2 Pages) i 3r11/19 STATE OF NEW YORK,COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER ) as: 121,( 1-1.4-C L (,,y/Z' ,being duly sworn,deposes and states that he/she is the applicant above named, (print name of individual signing as the applicant) an further states that(s)he is the legal owner of the property to which this application pertains,or that(s)he is the for the legal owner and is duly authorized to make and file this application. (indicate architect.contractor,agent.attorney,etc.) That all statements contained herein are true to the best of his/her knowledge and belief,and that any work performed,or use conducted at the above captioned property will be in conformance with the details as set forth and contained in this application and in any accompanying approved plans and specifications,as well as in accordance with the New York State Uniform Fire Prevention & Building Code,the Code of the Village of Rye Brook and all other applicable laws,ordinances and regulations. Sworn to before me this Sworn to before me this V� day of 11\ 20 day of ,20 a 1 Signature orMpEny Owner S gnature 6f Applicatft i Mom / Print Name of Property Owner Print Name of Applicant Notary Public SHARI MELILLO Notary ppu�blic Notary Public,State of NewYcr`< SHARI MELILLO No. 01 ME6160063 Notary Public, State of New York Q:+alified in Westchester County No. 01 ME616CC63 Qualified in Westchester County Commission Expires January?_9 2n 3 Commission Expires Janua,,, This application must be properly completed in its entirety and must include the notartzed2sigita (s) of the legal owner(s) of the subject property, and the applicant of record in the spaces provided. Applications not properly completed in its entirety and/or not properly signed shall be deemed null and void and will be returned to the applicant. -2- 3/21/19 BUILDING DEPARTMENT FR[AU�61 i VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK 3 2021 ] DD 938 KING STREET RYE BROOK,NY 10573 (914)939-0668 FAX(914)939-5801 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK ivww.ryebrook.orE BUILDING DEPARTMENT AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE VILLAGE CODE §216 -STORM SEWERS AND SANITARY SEWERS THIS AFFIDAVIT MUST BEAR THE NOTARIZED SIGNATURE OF THE LEGAL PROPERTY OWNER AND HE SUBMITTED ALONG WITH ANY BUILDING OR PLUMBING PERMIT APPLICATION. ANY BUILDING OR PLUMBING PERMIT APPLICATION SUBMITTED WITHOUT THIS COMPLETED AND NOTARIZED FORM WILL BE RETURNED TO THR ABHLICANT. STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER ) as: �,— i. Jet i1�� \G✓ S I > 1 I\\c,�Jc�r Ids , 1 ,�ci� N l(X f� residing at. (Print name) i being duly sworn,deposes and states that (s)he is the applicant above named, and further states that (s)he is the legal owner of the property to which this Affidavit of Compliance pertains at, Rye Brook, NY. Further that all statements contained herein are true, and that to the best of his/her knowledge and belief, that there are no known illegal cross-connections concerning either the storm sewer or sanitary sewer, and further that there are no roof drains, sump pumps, or other prohibited stormwater or groundwater connections or sources of inflow or infiltration of any kind into the sanitary sewer from the subject property in accordance with all State, County and Village Codes. • tt'nnt.�.Inc ut t'n,Fxrty OHneri�)) Sworn to before me this X� of , 20a�\ _ (Notary I'ubIIC� SHARI MELILLO Notary Public, State of New York No. 01 ME6160063 Cualified in Westchester County Commission Expires January 29 20 _3_ 3/21/19 RECEIVED FEB 12 2021 February 11, 2021 APPROVED 6-0 VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE RESOLUTION GRANTING SITE PLAN AND WETLAND PERMIT APPROVALS FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 18 HILLANDALE ROAD VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK PLANNING BOARD WHEREAS, Daniel Marks ("Applicant's submitted an application for approval of an Site Plan and Wetland Permit for the construction of an in-ground swimming pool, retaining walls,deck renovations and a pergola(the"Project'D,on a 44,478 square-foot property located in the Village of Rye Brook ("Village's commonly known as 18 Hillandale Road ("Subject Property'D and shown on the tax assessment map as Parcel ID 135.28-1-39 on the Town of Rye Tax Map and located in the R-25 Zoning District; and WHEREAS, the Property consists of 44,478 square feet and is developed with a two- story residence with a deck,walkways, driveway and curb cut; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board is the Approval Authority for the Site Plan pursuant to Section 209-1.A(2)(a) of the Village Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board is also the Approval Authority for the Wetland Permit application pursuant to Chapter 245; and WHEREAS, the Project is a Type II Action pursuant to 6 NYCRR 617.5(c)(9) of the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) thereby requiring no environmental review; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board has received and reviewed the following plans and application materials: 1. Short Environmental Assessment Form and EAF Mapper Summary Report dated 12/22/20; 2. Application for Site Plan Approval; 3. Site Plan Submittal Review Checklist; 4. Wetlands Permit Application; 5. Building Permit Check List & Zoning Analysis; 6. An Engineer's Report for Mark Residence dated 12/16/20, prepared by Christopher S. Utschig, P.E.; 7. The following engineering plans generally entitled, "Marks Residence" prepared Christopher S. Utschig, P.E., last revised 1/29/21: a. Sheet 1 of 2, "Site Plan," b. Sheet 2 of 2, "Construction Details;" 1313/074/4841-8286-2811v1 2111121 8. The following architectural plans generally entitled, "Marks Residence" prepared John G. Scarlato,Jr.,Architect, dated 11/3/20: a. Sheet A-1, "Deck Elevations," b. Sheet A-2, "Deck Floor Plan, Deck Framing Plan," c. Sheet A-3, "Deck Notes & Details;" 9. The following landscape plans generally entitled, "Marks Residence" prepared Daniel Sherman, RLA, last revised 2/4/21: a. Sheet L-1, "Overall Site Plan & Construction Details," b. Sheet L-2, "Site Plan (Pool)," c. Sheet L-3, "Mitigation Planting;" d. Sheet M-1, "Mitigation Planting (Off-Site)," dated 2/3/21; 10. A Site Survey prepared by Ramsay Land Surveying, LLC dated 11/28/20; and WHEREAS, the Village Planning Consultant, Village Staff and the Planning Board reviewed the information, submitted comments regarding the Project and made recommendations regarding the wetland buffer disturbance and stormwater management; and WHEREAS, on February 11, 2021, the Planning Board opened a public hearing on the Site Plan and Wetland Permit applications and all persons interested were given an opportunity to speak on behalf of or in opposition to said application, and the Planning Board closed the public hearing on February 11, 2021; and WHEREAS, due to public health and safety concerns related to the current COVID- 19 pandemic, the January 14, 2021 and February 11, 2021 meetings of the Planning Board, at which this application was heard,was duly noticed and held via videoconference in accordance with the requirements of the Zoning Code of the Village of Rye Brook and the Governor's Executive Orders which suspend the "in-person" requirements of the NYS Open Meetings Law and provide alternative means by which to conduct public meetings and hearings; and WHEREAS, the total area of disturbance proposed within the wetland buffer is 9,296 square feet necessitating a total mitigation area of 18,592 square feet pursuant to Village Code §245-9.A(3) which requires mitigation of buffer disturbance at a ratio of at least two to one; and WHEREAS, on-site mitigation of the total area of required mitigation is not possible, therefore, off-site mitigation is proposed; and WHEREAS, the Applicant proposes 12,900 square feet of new plantings as on-site mitigation for disturbances to the wetland buffer and the remaining 5,692 square feet of mitigation is proposed to be located off-site; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board has considered the Wetland Permit standards set forth in Village Code §245-8.A and finds that the Applicant proposes sufficient wetland 13131074/4841-8286-2811v1 2111121 -2- mitigation in compliance with Village Code standards subject to compliance with the conditions set forth herein; and WHEREAS,the Planning Board is fully familiar with the application and the Property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that for the reasons stated herein, the Village of Rye Brook Planning Board hereby approves the Site Plan and Wetland Permit applications for the construction of an in-ground swimming pool, retaining walls, deck renovations and a pergola on a 44,478 square-foot property located at 18 Hillandale Road and shown on the tax assessment map as Parcel ID 135.28-1-39 on the Town of Rye Tax Map and located in the R-25 Zoning District, upon the following conditions: 1. Prior to the issuance of a building permit the Applicant shall obtain a Steep Slopes Permit from the Planning Board. 2. Prior to the issuance of a building permit the Applicant shall perform a deep hole percolation test. Results shall be submitted to the Village for review and the test shall be witnessed by the Superintendent of Public Works/Engineering and/or the Village's Consulting Engineer who may, in their sole discretion, direct modifications to the stormwater design, as necessary. 3. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the Applicant shall complete 5,692 square feet of off-site wetland mitigation at the Edgewood Retention Basin at the intersection of Meadowlark Road and Bluebird Hollow (Parcel ID 135.28-1-42) which mitigation shall include removal of invasive vines, weeds, shrubbery and growth as directed by and to the satisfaction of the Superintendent of Public Works/Engineering or the Village's Planning Consultant. 4. The Wetland Permit shall be valid for a period of one year from the date of this resolution, however, an extension of an original permit may be granted upon written request to the Planning Board by the original permit holder or his/her legal agent at least 90 days prior to the expiration date of the original permit. 5. The written Wetland Permit issued pursuant to this approval shall contain the following conditions pursuant to Section 245-11.B of the Village of Rye Brook Code: a. Work conducted under a permit shall be open to inspection at any time, including weekends and holidays, by the approval authority, the Advisory Council on Environmental Conservation, the Superintendent of Public Works/Village Engineer or their designated representatives. b. All permits issued under this chapter shall be void and of no effect after one year from the date of issue thereof, unless the work for which the permit was issued has been actually commenced and not been abandoned during that period. In such cases, the applicant may reapply for a permit from the approval authority in accordance with the provisions of this chapter. If the 1313/07414841-8286-2811v1 2111121 -3- work for which the permits were issued have commenced within one year from the date of issuance of the permits, such permits may be renewed by the approval authority in accordance with the renewal provisions set forth at §§ 213-12.13 and 245-5.B(7) of the Village Code. c. The permit holder shall provide written notification to the Superintendent of Public Works/Village Engineer of the date on which the regulated activity is to begin at least five business days in advance of such date. d. The approval authority's permit shall be prominently displayed at the project site during the undertaking of any of the activities authorized by the permit. e. The boundaries of the regulated activity and all wetlands and watercourses shall be stated and appropriately marked in the field so as to make the boundaries visible. f. The permits, including all conditions, shall be binding on all successors and assignees of the permit holder. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that no permits shall be issued by the Building Department until the Applicant has paid to the Village all applicable fees and professional review fees incurred in connection with review of this Application. On motion by Mr. Morlino, seconded by Mr. Zahl, Mr. Michal Nowak, Superintendent of Public Works/Engineering, called the roll: MS. DRECHSLER Voting EXCUSED MR. GRZAN Voting AYE MR. MORLINO Voting AYE MS. SCHOEN Voting AYE MR. TARTAGLIA Voting AYE MR. ZAHL Voting AYE CHAIRMAN GOODMAN Voting AYE 1313/074/4841-8286-2811v1 2111121 -4- RECEIVED MAR 12 202 i March 11, 2021 APPROVED 6-0 VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE RESOLUTION GRANTING STEEP SLOPES PERMIT APPROVAL FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 18 HILLANDALE ROAD VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK PLANNING BOARD WHEREAS, Daniel Marks ("Applicant") submitted an application for approval of an Steep Slopes Permit for the construction of an in-ground swimming pool,retaining walls,deck renovations and a pergola (the "Project', on a 44,478 square-foot property located in the Village of Rye Brook("Village's commonly known as 18 Hillandale Road("Subject Property' and shown on the tax assessment map as Parcel ID 135.28-1-39 on the Town of Rye Tax Map and located in the R-25 Zoning District; and WHEREAS, the Property consists of 44,478 square feet and is developed with a two- story residence with a deck,walkways, driveway and curb cut; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board is the Approval Authority for the Steep Slopes Permit pursuant to Chapter 213 of the Village Code; and WHEREAS, the Project is a Type II Action pursuant to 6 NYCRR 617.5(c)(9) of the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) thereby requiring no environmental review; and WHEREAS, on February 11, 2021 the Planning Board granted Site Plan and Wetland Permit Approvals for the Project; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board has received and reviewed the following plans and application materials: 1. Short Environmental Assessment Form and EAF Mapper Summary Report dated 12/22/20; 2. Application for Site Plan Approval; 3. Site Plan Submittal Review Checklist; 4. Wetlands Permit Application; 5. Building Permit Check List& Zoning Analysis; 6. An Engineer's Report for Mark Residence dated 12/16/20, prepared by Christopher S. Utschig, P.E.; 7. The following engineering plans generally entitled, "Marks Residence" prepared Christopher S. Utschig, P.E., last revised 1/29/21: a. Sheet 1 of 2, "Site Plan," b. Sheet 2 of 2, "Construction Details;" 1313/074/4841-8286-2811v1 3112121 8. A plan entitled, "Slope Analysis Plan,"prepared by Christopher S. Utschig,P.E., dated 2/18/21; 9. The following architectural plans generally entitled, "Marks Residence" prepared John G. Scarlato,Jr.,Architect, dated 11/3/20: a. Sheet A-1, "Deck Elevations," b. Sheet A-2, "Deck Floor Plan, Deck Framing Plan," c. Sheet A-3, "Deck Notes & Details;" 10.The following landscape plans generally entitled, "Marks Residence" prepared Daniel Sherman, RLA, last revised 2/4/21: a. Sheet L-1, "Overall Site Plan& Construction Details," b. Sheet L-2, "Site Plan (Pool)," c. Sheet L-3, "Mitigation Planting;" d. Sheet M-1, "Mitigation Planting (Off-Site)," dated 2/3/21; 11.A Site Survey prepared by Ramsay Land Surveying, LLC dated 11/28/20; and WHEREAS, the Village Planning Consultant, Village Staff and the Planning Board reviewed the information, submitted comments regarding the Project and made recommendations regarding the disturbance of steep slopes associated with the proposed retention area required for stormwater management on the Property; and WHEREAS, on March 11, 2021, the Planning Board opened a public hearing on the Site Plan and Wetland Permit applications and all persons interested were given an opportunity to speak on behalf of or in opposition to said application, and the Planning Board closed the public hearing on March 11, 2021; and WHEREAS, due to public health and safety concerns related to the current COVID- 19 pandemic, the March 11, 2021 meeting of the Planning Board, at which this application was heard,was duly noticed and held via videoconference in accordance with the requirements of the Zoning Code of the Village of Rye Brook and the Governor's Executive Orders which suspend the"in-person"requirements of the NYS Open Meetings Law and provide alternative means by which to conduct public meetings and hearings; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board has considered the Steep Slopes Permit standards set forth in Village Code §213-6 and finds that the application to be in compliance; and WHEREAS,the Planning Board is fully familiar with the application and the Property. NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that for the reasons stated herein, the Village of Rye Brook Planning Board hereby approves the Steep Slopes Permit application for the construction of an in-ground swimming pool, retaining walls, deck renovations and a pergola on a 44,478 square-foot property located at 18 Hillandale Road and shown on the tax assessment map as Parcel ID 135.28-1-39 on the Town of Rye Tax Map and located in the R- 25 Zoning District. 1313/074/4841-8286-2811v1 3112121 -2- BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that no permits shall be issued by the Building Department until the Applicant has paid to the Village all applicable fees and professional review fees incurred in connection with review of this Application. On motion by Mr. Morlino, seconded by Mr.Tartaglia,Mr. Michal Nowak, Superintendent of Public Works/Engineering, called the roll: MS. DRECHSLER Voting EXCUSED MR. GRZAN Voting AYE MR. MORLINO Voting AYE MS. SCHOEN Voting AYE MR. TARTAGLIA Voting AYE MR. ZAHL Voting AYE CHAIRMAN GOODMAN Voting AYE 1313/07414841-8286-2811v1 3112121 -3- RECEIVED AU[ gin`` July 28, 2022 APPROVED 5-0 VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE RESOLUTION APPLICATION FOR AMENDED SITE PLAN FOR 18 HILLANDALE VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK PLANNING BOARD WHEREAS, Daniel Sherman, RLA, on behalf of property owners Daniel Marks and Yael Marks, submitted an application for approval of an Amended Site Plan for landscaping modifications, pool filter location and fencing on the property located at 18 Hillandale Road in the R-25 Zoning District, Section 135.28, Block 1, Lot 39 as shown on the Town of Rye Tax Assessor's Map ("Property'; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board reviewed the following plans and application materials: 1. Short Environmental Assessment Form and EAF Mapper Summanl Report dated 12/22/20; 2. Application for Site Plan Approval; 3. Site Plan Submittal Review Checklist; 4. Application to Amend Approved Plans; 5. The following landscape plans generally entitled, "Marks Residence" prepared Daniel Sherman, RLA, last revised 3/29/22: a. Sheet L-1, "Overall Site Plan& Construction Details," b. Sheet L-2, "Amendment to Mitigation Planting," C. Sheet L-2A,"Amendment to Mitigation Planting(Side Yard Enlargement),"last revised 7/11/22; C. Sheet L-3, "Wall Section," last revised 7/25/22; d. Sheet M-1, "Mitigation Planting;" 6. A Site Survey prepared by Ramsay Land Surveying,LLC dated 11/20/21; 7. Site Plans entitled, "Marks Residence" prepared by Christopher S. Utschig, L.P.E, last revised 7/25/22: a. Sheet 1 of 2, "Site Plan;" b. Sheet 2 of 2, "Construction Details;" 8. Slope Analysis Plan entitled, "Marks Residence" prepared by Christopher S. Utschig, L.P.E,dated 2/18/22. 9. Drainage Areas Map, prepared by Christopher S. Utschig, P.E, dated 7/21/22; 10. Letter from Allison Fausner, Esq, Cuddy& Feder,LLP, dated April 7, 2022; 11. Supplemental Submission Letter from Allison Fausner, Esq., Cuddy & Feder, LLP, dated April 28, 2022; 12. Letter from Daniel Sherman, RLA, dated May 11, 2022; 13. Letter from Yael and Daniel Marks, dated 5/31/2022; 14. Email from Christopher Utschig,LPE,dated 6/9/2022; 15. Letter from Christopher Utschig,L.P.E., dated 6/9/2022; 16. Letter from Christopher Utschig,L.P.E, dated 7/7/2022; 17. Letter from James Natarelli, P.E. Dolph Rotfeld Engineering, dated 7/13/2022; 18. Letter from Christopher Utschig,L.P.E.,dated 7/20/2022; 19. Letter from James Natarelli, P.E. Dolph Rotfeld Engineering, dated 7/26/2022; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board is the Approval Authority for the Site Plan pursuant to Section 209-1.A(2)(a) and Section 209-1.B(8) of the Village Code; and WHEREAS, the Project is a Type II Action pursuant to 6 NYCRR 617.5(c)(12) of the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) thereby requiring no environmental review; and WHEREAS, the Village Planning Consultant,Village Engineering Consultant,Village Staff and the Planning Board reviewed the information and submitted comments regarding the application; and WHEREAS, a duly advertised public hearing on the application was opened by the Planning Board on March 10,2022 and continued to May 13,2022,June 9,2022,July 14,2022 and July 28, 2022, at which time all persons interested were given an opportunity to speak on behalf of or in opposition to said application and the Planning Board closed the public hearing on July 28, 2022; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board is familiar with the site and all aspects of the project. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED,that for the reasons stated herein, the Village of Rye Brook Planning Board hereby approves the Amended Site Plan listed herein for landscaping modifications, pool filter location and fencing on the property located at 18 Hillandale Road, upon the following conditions: 1. The Planning Board hereby waives the requirement for the submission of a Construction Management Plan pursuant to Village Code §209-2.B. 2. The Applicant shall install a variable speed motor pump.The pump to be installed shall be the Jandy VS ProFlo 1.85 HP pump or an equivalent model that advertises a 40% sound reduction. The pump shall be covered with the sound attenuating pump cover. The cover to be installed shall be the Serene+ L080555 pump cover or equivalent model that provides 75%-90% sound reduction. I The fill that has accumulated against the chain link fence between 18 Hillandale and 16 Hillandale shall be immediately removed by the Applicant. All fill that accumulates against the chain link fence between 18 Hillandale and 16 Hillandale shall be removed by the Applicant on a regular basis. 4. The Stormwater Management Standards for the Village of Rye Brook,NY through the NYS DEC MS4 Regulations require ongoing annual inspections to ensure the proper maintenance and operation of stormwater management facilities. Inspections must be conducted by qualified personnel such as a Professional Engineer,Landscape Architect or Trained Inspector. Completed reports must be submitted to the Village of Rye Brook Engineering/Public Works Department by March 31It of each year. 5. The arborvitaes to be planted in accordance with the landscape plan shall be at least 10 feet tall. 6. The Applicant shall provide an as built survey of the entire propem, after the work is completed in accordance with the Village Code. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that no permits shall be issued by the Building Department until the ,kpplicant has paid to the Village all applicable fees and professional review fees incurred in connection with review of this Application. On motion by Mr. Grzan, seconded by Ms. Schoen, Superintendent of Public Works/Village Engineer, called the roll: MR. KROM Voting AYE MR. GRZAN Voting AYE MR. MENDELSOHN Voting Excused MR. RETTNER Voting Recused MS. SCHOEN Voting AYE MR. TARTAGLIA Voting AYE CHAIRMAN GOODMAN Voting AYE RECEIVED FEB 14 2022 February 10, 2022 APPROVED 7-0 VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE RESOLUTION SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING AMENDED SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR 18 HILLANDALE ROAD VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK PLANNING BOARD WHEREAS, Daniel Sherman, RLA, on behalf of the property owners, Daniel Marks and Yael Marks, has submitted Application for approval of an Amended Site Plan for landscaping modifications, pool filter location and fencing on the property located at 18 Hillandale Road, SBL 135.28-1-39 on the Town of Rye Tax Map, in the R-25 Zoning District; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Planning Board of the Village of Rye Brook will hold a public hearing on March 10, 2022 at 7:30 p.m. in Village Hall, 938 King Street, Rye Brook, New York or in a virtual format as may be determined depending on public health concerns to consider the above-referenced application; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Applicant is hereby directed to comply with Section 250-40 of the Village Code regarding notification of the public hearing. On motion by Mrs. Schoen, seconded Mr. Morlino, Mr. Nowak, Superintendent of Public Works, called the roll: MR. GOTTLIEB Voting Yes MR. GRZAN Voting Yes MR. MENDELSOHN Voting Yes MR. MORLINO Voting Yes MRS. SCHOEN Voting Yes MR. TARTAGLIA Voting Yes CHAIRMAN GOODMAN Voting Yes NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Public Notice is hereby given for a Site Plan Amendment Application submitted to the Village of Rye Brook Planning Board. The matter is scheduled for a Public Hearing before the Planning Board on March 10, 2022 at 7:30 p.m., at Rye Brook Village Hall, 938 King Street, Rye Brook, New York 10573 Owner: Daniel Marks & Yael Marks Applicant: Daniel Sherman, LA Premises: 18 Hillandale Road (Parcel ID# 135.28-1-39) Application: Review of a Site Plan Amendment Application for the proposed landscaping modifications,pool filter location and fencing. ANNOUNCEMENT: This meeting will be held at the Village of Rye Brook Village Hall, 938 King Street, New York,in person unless the Planning Board makes a determination to meet by videoconference and teleconference as is permitted under Chapter 1 of the Laws of 2022 amending Sections 1 and 2 of Part E of Chapter 417 of the Laws of 2021. Whether the meeting is held in person or virtually, the public will have an opportunity to see and hear the meeting live and provide comments. Please check the Village website at www.ryebrook.org or contact the Planning Board Secretary at (914) 939-0668 for information concerning attendance at the meeting or hearing. NOTICE OF CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING Public Notice is hereby given for a Site Plan Amendment Application submitted to the Village of Rye Brook Planning Board. The matter is scheduled for a Public Hearing before the Planning Board on June 9, 2022 at 6:30 p.m., at Rye Brook Village Hall, 938 King Street, Rye Brook, New York 10573 Owner: Daniel Marks & Yael Marks Applicant: Daniel Sherman, RLA Premises: 18 Hillandale Road (Parcel ID# 135.28-1-39) Application: Review of a Site Plan Amendment Application for the proposed landscaping modifications,pool filter location and fencing. Additional information is available at the Rye Brook Engineering Department at (914) 939-0753. BUILDING DEPARTMENT [ECIEVED V VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK 938 KING STREET RYE BROOK,NY 10573 JAN 2 0 2022 (914)939-0668 W".ryebrook.orpz VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK BUILDING DEPARTMENT FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: - 7/ �!/f/n �� BOT Approval Date: PB Approval Date: �J BOT Disapproval Date: PB Disapproval Date: Attach Resolution Hereto: BOT[ ] PB ZBA[ ] Chairman: SITE PLAN FEE: �r, ' DATE PAID: i aU)aO ao� ENVIRONMENTAL FEE: r •c DATE PAID: OTHER: APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL Submission of this application does not assure placement on any Planning Board Agenda.The Applicant will be notified of such placement. This application references but is not limited to the following sections of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook;§250 ZONING,§209 SITE PLAN REVIEW,§235 TREES,§107 DEMOLITION OF BUILDINGS,§224 SWIMMING POOLS,§121 EXCAVATION&TOPSOIL REMOVAL, §118 EROSION& SEDIMENT CONTROL, §213 STEEP SLOPES PROTECTION, §219 SUBDIVISION OF LAND, §250-40 NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS. Applicants and their Design Professionals are strongly advised to review the above mentioned code sections online at,www.lyebrook.org prior to completing and/or submitting this application. APPLICATION FEE SCHEDULE: Residential Dwellings- $325.00,plus$200.00 per additional dwelling unit. Non-Residential Buildings- $475.00,plus $30.00 per parking space. Planned Unit Development- $600.00,per acre PUD Amendment- $300.00 Site Plan Amendment- $575.00 Wetlands& Watercourse- $1,150.00,permit$250.00 Consultant Review(Escrow)Fee: Minimum fee$250.00-maximum fee$2,500.00 to be determined by the Village Engineer. Application fees are non-refundable. The applicant s Escrox Account must have a positire balance at all times prior to anti•Consultant, Attorney, or tillage review Escrow Fees and Site Plan Fees must he paid on separate checks made pavable to the Village of Rve Brook. 1. Site Address: (?) HILLP,1SI A1-E 1?.a Parcel ID#:1!�5.2 S-1- 301 Zone: Q.-7 S 2. Property Owner: Tj�,t.1tGL rnAet_S Address:IF) EAkLLPrLCnt.E gjC> t M 5 3WWL�{J y E-Mail:TDPM•metRY..S1'S(2 �1 b1A1L-CO►Y� Tel.#:Al 4--11 - 31(ol Other: 3. Applicant:��F�.►,IGI SHC--F_Msq0 Address: 4 I]t t1)N SOi1'E G ,qRL4IALLA P`/ E-Mail:f*)Au.T`p►kj_% IEZp AL LP.I�OSCAD��6tri�1t;Co►i Tel.#91y-Sr'j1p LI- 9999 Other: 4. Design Professional:DfZla tICL SHERrYN9%3 Address: E-Mail: Tel.#: Other: 5. Designate to whom correspondence is to be sent: 'DI•NQIL=L SHC—CZIYIAJ rote: If applicant is a"Contract Vendee please attach a copy of the contract summary with financial and confidential terms deleted. 1 8112/2021 6. Street which property abuts: Y—IkjcG SU 7. Does property connect directly into State or County highway? ()()NO ( )YES: 8. Is site within 500 feet of Village Boundary?(fit)NO ( )YES if yes note all bordering municipalities: 9. Total area of site: LN t yq I Area of site activity: , 7-10 10. Site coverage: 22 %; Building coverage: Cl 11. Existing building size: New/additional building size: 12. Existing parking spaces: New parking spaces: 13. Nature of proposed activity: Dt��1-0 /S►1Fq%3CNe0 s rrc— {tt--Ee {,.,OCfT�'►Ova L�1[1SC,AOC 1=6JClub �2Atu [�AR.C7C,+..) T R.�TAtyt•�Gt �•4lL ****************************************************************************************** Please note that this application must include the notarized signature(s) of the legal owner(s) of the above-mentioned property, in the space provided below.Any application not bearing the legal property owner's notarized signature(s)shall be deemed null and void,and will be returned to the applicant. S�ATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY,OF WESTCHESTER ) as: j I c tiRh-A'IsN ,being duly sworn,deposes and states that he/she is th applican above named, (print name of individual signing as the applicant) and further states that (s)he is the legal owner of the pr�ich this application pertains, or that (s)he is the �A� I��(�-�4� � for the gal owner 'd is duly authorized to make and file this application. (indicate architect,contractor,agent,attorney,etc.) That all statements contained herein are true to the best of his/her knowledge and belief,and that any work performed,or use conducted at the above captioned property will be in conformance with the details as set forth and contained in this application and in any accompanying approved plans and specifications,as well as in accordance with the New York State Uniform Fire Prevention&Building Code,the Code of the Village of Rye Brook and all other applicable laws,ordinances and regulations. Sworn to before me this Sworn to before me this day of_ , 2GV day of, 6 , 2 aZ Notary P li *No . operty Owner + tnta e f Applicant yj apt' Print Name of Property Owner me of Applicant SHAM MELILLO Notary Public,State of New York �;p.�'•.iiiculrrn�3 �t„,m-;;1,A Hyuklong Lee 0�lalified in Westch-ster County State t New Jersey `1� �'��� Notary Public Commission Expires January 29.2023 "�� Commission No.50169466 My Commission Expires 8.12Y2026 2 BM2f2021 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK 938 King Street,Rye Brook,N.Y. 10573 (914)939-0753 www. ook.org SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REVIEW CHECKLIST This form shall serve as a checklist for site plan submittal and review by the Village of Rye Brook. The use of this plan review checklist by the applicant is to ensure compliance with the technical provisions of§209 of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook entitled, Site Plan Review, pertaining to preliminary and final plan preparation. The Village Code is available on the Village Website at: www.rvebrook.or>?. Prior to the appearance before ANY meeting or hearing of the Planning Board,the applicant must comply with all Notification Requirements of Code Section 250-40. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL SHALL INCLUDE: 1. APPLICATIONS. Completed and signed including correspondences. 2. CHECKLIST. Completed and signed. 3. PLANS. Signed, Sealed & Dated. Four paper (4) copies and one (1) electronic version. One (1) record set with original signatures, dates and seals shall be provided and submitted with two (2) copies that clearly indicate the signatures,dates,and seals shown on the record set. 4. FEES: All application fees and Environmental fee. A separate check for filing fee and Environmental fee. 5. Environmental Assessment Form. Form available on the NYS DEC website and mapper. 6. Electronic Copy. Complete copy of all plans and shall be submitted electronically at time of submission. 7. Notarized Affidavit of Sign Posting & Mail Notification. 1, (Applicant's signature)have read the Notification Requirements of Code Section 250-40 and will provide notification as required. IDENTIFICATION OF APPLICANT(S): Identification of Applicant:'fPM E.L %HSZIMA0 Applicant: �11=L 54-1 c�Z1N�Plt� 114til06CRDE AQCH fTGC F Address:y PROF)Ujj" SUrte#*C1 I �J f�LHALLA P- l O,q5 Tel.#:(AILI- ?Ja4- Cjlgq Fax: E-Mail: tit t�wSHCR �U�taDSCP►o�to Project Name: IF-3 HILU-r..l0AlE R� 6�41L Project Address:l8 4U-A'QF- ►LLY R Current Property Owner:h�o 18. IMAUS Address: Jill WLL.Lfttrr.)Ati- ZU FRAC bGDL �y Tel. #: al4-'11 S • 51 to I Fax: E-Mail: CLAW• mARKt 13 GrnA I L.Coy% IDENTIFICATION OF PROPERTY: Identifying Title: Tax Designation: Section: 13 5-Z'b Block: Lot: 301 Zoning District: (2 -2- Street which property abuts: K-i QG 5'T Plan Submission Date: 1 Iq I"L-L Site Plan Checklist Page 1 of 7 8/12/2021 Project Address Y N NA PLANREOUIREMENTS O O O 4 copies of plans prepared and signed by a registered Land Surveyor,Engineer or Architect. O O O One(1)electronic copy of all submitted plans and surveys. O O O Topographic Survey stamped by New York State Land Surveyor with license number and seal. O O O Topographic survey scale of one(1)inch per twenty(20)feet or larger. O O O Section, block and lot numbers of the property taken from the latest tax records along with a copy of the most recent property card on file with the Town of Rye Tax Assessor's office. O O O Name of the proposed subdivision plan. O O O Name and address of the owner of record. O O O Name and address of the applicant. O O O Deed reference(s). O O O Names, addresses and signature of every Engineer, Architect, Land Surveyor or Soil Scientist whose professional seal appears on any site plan submitted to the Board. O O O North arrow and scale. O O O Location map at the minimum scale of 1"equals 1,000 feet. O O O Area of all lots,in square feet. O O O Engineering notes on plans as stated in application packages. O O O Copies of all existing and proposed deed restrictions or covenants applying to the property, including,but not limited to, covenants and agreements restricting the use and establishing future ownership and maintenance responsibilities for all private roads,recreation,and open space areas. O O O Any prior land use approvals with respect to the subject property. 000 Date the plans were first drafted. Any revision(s)made to any of the sheets first submitted are to be so noted in the revision block. The revision block is to be placed on the originals of the revised sheets. Additional paper copies are to be made& submitted for the Planning Board&Building Dept.to replace those sheets previously submitted. O O O Other existing site improvements,including,but not limited to,fences,landscape or retaining walls,landscaping & screening. 000 Location of all buildings and structures on the premises and approximate location of all neighboring buildings or structures within 100 feet of the lot line. O O O Fees paid to The Village of Rye Brook Building Department. O O O Any revisions to plans shall be identified with a revision cloud and numbered revision triangle Y N NA ABUTTING PROPERTY INFORMATION O O O The names and addresses of all abutting property owners within 250 ft as indicated in the Municipal records. O O O Zoning and use of abutting properties noted on plans. O O O Shape,size,height and location of existing buildings and driveways within one hundred(100)feet of the site. O O O Location and description of existing easements within one hundred(100)feet of the site. O O O Location of existing private or public trails within one hundred(100)feet of the site. O O O Location of existing roads,scenic roads and/or driveways within two hundred(200)feet of the site. O O O Location of proposed parkland. If none state nearest recreation facility O O O Location of existing septic system leach fields within two hundred(200)feet of the site. O O O Locations,dimensions,grades and flow direction of existing sewers,culverts,waterlines as well as other underground utilities within and adjacent to the property. Site Plan Checklist Page 2 of 7 8/12/2021 Project Address O O O The location of all existing watercourses,intermittent streams,wetland areas and springs,consistent with the definitions set forth in Chapter 245,Wetlands and Watercourses,of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook. V N NA PROPOSED SITE PLAN INFORMATION O O O Sufficient, acceptable information to readily determine the location, bearing, and length of every street line, lot line, and property boundary line. 000 Location of all building setback lines. 000 Topographic data at a minimum contour interval of 2'-0"increments,showing existing and proposed contours on the property and extending a minimum of 25 feet into all adjacent properties. O O O The location and characteristics of the different areas of vegetation,including the identification of all individual trees 12 or more inches in diameter at breast height("DBH"),protected trees of any size,as well as stands of trees and wooded areas, within areas of proposed disturbance, consistent with the provisions of Chapter 235, Trees, of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook. O O O Location and proposed development of all buffer areas,including existing vegetative cover. O O O Location and description of any zoning district and municipal boundaries including a zoning compliance chart for the existing and proposed lots. O O O Shape,size,height and location of all existing and proposed buildings. O O O Location and description of any existing and proposed easements. O O O Location and dimensions of all existing and proposed streets,driveways,sidewalks,parking spaces,bicycle parking, loading areas and other facilities associated with the proposed use. O O O Identification of the location and amount of building area proposed for retail sales or similar commercial activity. O O O Location of existing and proposed utilities(water,sewer,gas,electrical,telephone,oil tank etc.). O O O Design and location of all existing and proposed wells,septic tanks and leach field systems,or methods of waste water disposal. O O O Location,type and size of all existing and proposed landscaping and screening including fences and walls. O O O Location,size and proposed screening of outdoor storage areas,if any. O O O Location, design and construction material of all existing or proposed site improvements, including drains, culverts, retaining walls,landscape walls and fences. O O O Exterior lighting plan and proposed signs to be located on site,including sign orientation,size,height,and elevation view. O O O Storm drainage plan and plans for snow removal and storage. O O O Pedestrian and automobile circulation plan. O O O Construction drawings for pavements,walks,steps,curbing,drainage&other structures associated with the proposed use. O O O Erosion and sedimentation control plan,including installation details of proposed control measures,directive construction notations and a schedule for the installation and maintenance of proposed control measure. O O O Description of measures planned to assure proper erosion and sedimentation control in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 118 entitled"Erosion and Sediment Control,"of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook. O O O Drawing and computation for storm water detention design for a 25-year storm in accordance with the Westchester County Best Management Practices O O O Rock outcroppings and areas of steep slope consistent with the definitions set forth in Chapter 213, Steep Slope Protection, of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook. O O O Location of any common lands and/or public lands. O O O Phasing or an estimated project construction schedule. O O O Supporting documents, including deeds,maintenance,condominium agreements,etc. Site Plan Checklist Page 3 of 7 8/12/2021 Project Address 000 Location of proposed construction or area of disturbance and its relationship to any property line, easement, building, structure, road, wall, fence, sewage disposal system, well, wetland feature or tree exceeding six inches in diameter measured at a height of four feet from the ground O O O Estimate of earthwork showing the quantity of any material to be imported to and/or removed from the site including a chart with the number/species and size of any trees to be removed. O O O Location and size of areas of soils by soil types in the area of proposed disturbance and to a distance of 100 feet surrounding the area of disturbance. 000 Cross sections of steep slope areas. O O O Retaining walls or like constructions,with details of construction. O O O Approximate boundaries of any areas subject to flooding or stormwater overflows, including areas of special flood hazard and coastal high-hazard areas, consistent with the definitions set forth in Chapter 130, Flood Damage Prevention, of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook.Approximate Wetlands and wetland buffer boundaries shall be clearly delineated. O O O Location of fire and other emergency zones,including the location of fire hydrants. O O O Studies to include,but not necessarily limited to: environmental impact analysis,wildlife,traffic,stormwater management,recreation,public service,fiscal impact,visual impact and historic significance documentation,or a written request to waive the submission requirements for these studies. O O O Amount of any bonds required. O O O Amount of excavated material to be removed from site,if any. Y N NA OTHER(as applicable) O O O Record of application for and approval status of all necessary permits from state and county officials and local utility companies. O O O Identification of any federal,state or county permits required for the projects execution,including project referrals, if any,&environmental review procedures mandated by Article 8,Environmental Quality Review,of the Environmental Conservation Law(SEQRA). O O O Any other information felt necessary by the Planning Board to allow the Board to proceed with consideration&to make an informed decision. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CHECKLIST WESTCHESTER COUNTY PLANNING BOARD Notice to Applicants/Developers: At some point during the development review process your project may be referred to the Westchester County Planning Board for review and comment in accordance with state and county laws that require local planning boards, zoning boards of appeals and governing bodies to refer certain development applications to the County Planning Board. Referral to the County Planning Board may not occur until your project has progressed well along through the design process. Since the Planning Board's comments may impact project design,this checklist is provided to encourage early consideration of these areas of concern by applicants to avoid project changes later. For information on the County Planning Board review process and to access an electronic copy of this checklist, go online to www.westchestergov.com/planningrefetrals or contact Lukas Herbert at lah5@westchestergov.com. I. COUNTY PLANNING BOARD POLICIES: Written policies underlie all recommendations of the County Planning Board. Westchester 2025-Context for County and Municipal Planning and Policies to Guide County Planning,adopted by the County Planning Board on 5/6/08,amended 1/5/10,can be found at ww.westchestergov.com/2025. ❑ Westchester 2025: Policies should be reviewed to determine how they relate to the development proposal. II.IMPACTS TO COUNTY FACILITIES AND SERVICES: The County Planning Board coordinates the review of development projects with Westchester County departments to identify and address potential impacts on County services and infrastructure. In some situations,permits and approvals may be required that could change project design. Site Plan Checklist Page 4 of 7 8/12/2021 Project Address ❑ Map of County Facilities: Review the State & County Roads and Parks map (which also includes county channel lines) to identify proximity to County facilities at: www.westchestergov.com/planningdocs/pdfmaps/countystateroadsparks.pdf. Other useful map links for information about environmental features, septic/sewer map, county sewer districts map, etc can be found at: www.westchestergov.com/maps ❑ COUNTY ROAD: Applications for development on sites that abut a County road must be submitted for review by the County Department of Public Works. Information and forms can be found at: www.westchestergov.com/dpw/bidgpertn.htm. Former County Roads do not need review by the Department of Public Works,but will still likely trigger a review by the County Planning Board. ❑ COUNTY CHANNEL LINES: Applications for development on sites within 100 feet of a designated County Channel Line require a stream control permit from the County Department of Public Works. Information and forms can be found at: www.westchestergov.com/dpw/bldgpenn.htm ❑ COUNTY PARK: New construction & land alteration projects adjacent to County parks are expected to address screening & buffer of new uses from the park, as appropriate. Stormwater should not drain from a developed site onto a County park without acceptable quantity and quality controls.County parks are designated as Critical Environmental Areas. ❑ SEWAGE TREATMENT AT COUNTY TREATMENT PLANT: Local municipalities are required to reduce and eliminate inflow and infiltration(1&I)into the sanitary sewage systems tributary to County treatment plants.New development will be expected to reduce I&I in relation to generation of new flow at a ratio of three to one. This requirement must be discussed with local officials. ❑BEE-LINE BUS SERVICE: Bee-Line bus stops serving a development site should be identified on plans or noted if located off-site. If a bus stop is located along the site's frontage, the applicant should contact the County Department of Transportation to discuss impacts and the need for improvements. Safe and separate pedestrian access should be provided to link a bus stop and sidewalk with building entrances. Information on County bus service and design guidelines can be found at: westchestergov.com/tran sportation/imagesBus%20Service%2OGuidelines.pdf ❑FAIR AND AFFORDABLE HOUSING: Many municipalities require inclusion of fair & affordable units in new developments. Financial assistance to achieve fair & affordable housing development is available through Westchester County & other sources. Applications that include new residential units to be affirmatively marketed & sold or rented subject to fair & affordable housing provisions should be tied to Westchester County guidelines on affordability including income guidelines of eligible households that can be found at: http://homes.westchestergov.com/. If County funding is sought to develop fair & affordable housing,the County Board of Legislators must be included as an involved agency under SEQR. ❑RECYCLING: New buildings must contain a designated area of sufficient size for separation and storage of recyclables and trash. Building expansions should also include sufficient space for separation and storage of recyclables. For more information about County recycling requirements go to:www.westchestergov.com/environment_recycling.htm ❑STORM SEWER SYSTEM: Any connections to a County storm sewer line will require a permit from the Department of Public Works in accordance with the County Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination (IDDE) law. Information & forms can be found at:www.westchestergov.com/dpw/bldgperm.htm Non-stormwater discharges to the County storm sewer system are prohibited. III.DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS The County Planning Board's land use policies focus attention on several aspects of development that may have intermunicipal and quality of life impacts.The list below includes areas most frequently commented on by the County Planning Board. ❑WATER: All development plans should include sufficient provisions for stormwater management, water quality measures and mitigation of flooding. ❑Plans should identify the major drainage basin or watershed the site is located in (Croton River, Upper Hudson River, Lower Hudson, Upper Long Island Sound, Bronx River and Lower Long Island Sound). An interactive map with watershed boundaries can be found at www.westchcstergov.com/planning/maps&lists/drainbasinsI IxI7.htm1 ❑Watershed plans have been developed for several of the County's watersheds - the Croton, Indian Brook-Croton Gorge, Bronx River & Long Island Sound watersheds - that include specific recommendations that apply to development projects. See recommendations in watershed plans at: planning.westchestergov.com/index.php?option=com content&task=view&id= 1231& Itemid=2204 Site Plan Checklist Page 5 of 7 8/12/2021 Project Address ❑Development that involves filling, creation of impervious surfaces or buildings and substantive loss of natural vegetation in a floodplain or flood prone area should be avoided. ❑Above ground,vegetated retention/detention basins or devices are preferred because they perform better, are easier to inspect and maintain and provide additional environmental benefits over subsurface structural devices. Any such treatments should not be constructed within wetlands or buffer areas around wetlands. ❑The development should treat and retain as much stormwater on-site as possible,particularly when the site is located in a drainage basin with known flooding problems. A Construction Stormwater Toolbox with tools and sources of technical information related to the construction activities and stormwater management best practices is available from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation at: www.dec.ny.gov/chemicaU8694.htmi ❑New development should include protection of aquatic resources. For more information about protection of aquatic resourc-es & buffer areas,go to:planning.westchestergov.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1491&Itemid=2458 ❑Impervious cover should be minimized. Permeable paving surfaces should be used where feasible. Vegetative rain gardens should be used, particularly in areas of overland or channelized stormwater flow, to improve stormwater quality and reduce runoff volume. For more information,go to: www.westchestergov.com/stormwater ❑Buildings along coastlines and low lying area should consider the impacts of sea level rise. Specific consideration is required of potential impacts to surface and subsurface drinking water supplies. ❑ SITE LAYOUT.Aesthetic design,building orientation and community character should be considered in the site layout and building appearance. ❑In most locations,buildings should face the street and have pedestrian access from the street. ❑Commercial buildings should be located near the front street line with the majority of parking located in the rear of the building. Even gas stations and convenience stores should be upfront in a landscaped setting with parking,pumps and canopy toward the rear. ❑Buildings should be of pedestrian-scale when seen from the sidewalk. ❑Building facades should contribute to and enhance the character of the community. ❑Driveway and pathway connections should be provided to adjacent sites when possible and crosseasements provided. ❑ STREETS. Street design should reduce unwarranted paving and promote connectivity. ❑New streets should connect with adjacent streets wherever feasible to prevent the proliferation of dead-end streets and promote neighborhood integration. ❑Connections could be vehicular or pedestrian/bicycle only,where appropriate. ❑Street widths should be minimized for streets with low traffic volume to reduce speeds and impervious surfaces.Lane widths of 12 feet are only appropriate for major roadways. ❑Driveway widths should be no more than 9 feet to reduce impervious surfaces. ❑Permeable paving surfaces should be used where feasible. ❑ GREEN TECHNOLOGY.New development should include as many green building elements as possible,such as:renewable building materials,energy efficient heating/cooling systems and fixtures,water saving devices,green roofs and permeable paving surfaces. Information can be obtained from the U.S.Green Building Council at: www.usgbc.org. ❑ LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING.The site improvements should enhance community character. Site Plan Checklist Page 6 of 7 8/12/2021 Project Address ❑ Landscaping should consist of native plant species appropriate for the location. Invasive plant species should be prohibited. Invasive plant information available at: www.westchestergov.com/planning/environmental/Reports/InvasivePlantsBrochO8.pdf ❑ Pollutant tolerant plantings should effectively shield parking,loading areas and refuse collection sites. ❑ Site lighting should be provided at the lowest safe levels and lowest heights,avoiding all spillage off site. ❑ PEDESTRIANS. Safe,convenient and ADA accessible pedestrian access is provided. ❑ A sidewalk should be provided along the site frontage along each street. ❑ Direct pedestrian connections should be made from the front of the building to the sidewalk.Pedestrian crossings of drive-ways& parking lots should be minimized or avoided. If they must be provided,painted crosswalks should be provided through parking lots. ❑ ADA accessibility must be provided. ❑ BICYCLISTS. Provisions for bicyclists should be incorporated into project design. ❑ Bicycle parking should be provided in commercial and residential developments.Guidelines can be found at: www.apbp.org/resource/resmgr/publ ications/bicycle—Parking_guidelines.pd f ❑ If near a trailway or bicycle route,extra consideration should be given to bicycle accessibility such as bike lanes on internal roadways,bicycle parking and other amenities. ❑ Drive-thru lanes at uses such as banks and fast-food restaurants should also be accessible for bicycles. Waiver: Upon finding by the Building Inspector, Village Engineer, Planning Board or Board of Trustees that, due to the particular character or limited nature of development or change in use or to special conditions peculiar to a site,the submission of a final site plan,or certain portions of information normally required as part of the site development plan, is inappropriate or unnecessary or that strict compliance with said submission requirements will cause extraordinary and unnecessary hardship,such official or Board may waive such submission requirements wherever, in the opinion of such official or Board, such waiver will be consistent with the goal of promoting the public health, safety and general welfare of the community. The findings for granting such waiver shall become a part of the public record. Any waiver request must be made in writing,and include sufficient detailed information for the appropriate authority to make an informed decision. Design Professional's Certification of Completion of Checklist I have fully reviewed the Village of Rye Brook's requirements and certify this application to be a complete submission. I understand that an incomplete plat or incomplete checklist shall be deemed an incomplete submission and shall be returned to the applicant upon determination of such by the appropriate authority. Name(Print) Jl� SHG'R ��Ay Signature Date ► 19�2'Z Professional Seal Site Plan Checklist Page 7 of 7 8/12/2021 Short Environmental Assessment Fo [ECENE Part I - Project Information JAN 2 0 2022 I Instructions for Completine VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK BUILDING DEPARTMENT Part 1—Project Information. "rhe applicant or project sponsor is responsible for the completion of Part application for approval or funding,are subject to public review,and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item,please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information. Complete all items in Part 1.You may also provide any additional information which you believe will be needed by or useful to the lead agency;attach additional pages as necessary to supplement any item. Part 1—Project and Sponsor Information Name of Action or Project: Marks Residence Project Location(describe,and attach a location map): 18 Hillandale Rd,Rye Brook,NY Brief Description of Proposed Action: Proposed in-ground swimming pool,stone patio,stone retaining walls,stepping stones in grass,deck renovation,and pergola Name of Applicant or Sponsor: Telephone: 91 a-sea-osss Daniel Sherman E-Mail: dan.danshermanlandscapeCgmail.com Address: 4 Broadway,Suite#9 City/PO: State: Zip Code: Valhalla INY 10595 1. Does the proposed action only involve the legislative adoption of a plan,local law,ordinance, NO YES administrative rule,or regulation? If Yes,attach a narrative description of the intent of the proposed action and the environmental resources that may be affected in the municipality and proceed to Part 2. If no,continue to question 2. 2. Does the proposed action require a permit,approval or funding from any other government Agency? NO YES If Yes,list agency(s)name and permit or approval:Planning,Wetlands,Building,Engineering 3. a.Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? 1.02 acres b.Total acreage to be physically disturbed? .16 acres c.Total acreage(project site and any contiguous properties)owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? acres 4. Check all land uses that occur on,are adjoining or near the proposed action: 5. ❑Urban ❑ Rural(non-agriculture) ❑ Industrial ❑ Commercial m Residential(suburban) ❑Forest ❑ Agriculture ❑ Aquatic ❑ Other(Specify): ❑Parkland Page I of 3 5. Is the proposed action, NO YES N/A a. A permitted use under the zoning regulations? ❑ ❑✓ ❑ b. Consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan? ❑ ❑✓ ❑ NO YES 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the predominant character of the existing built or natural landscape? ❑ ❑✓ 7. Is the site of the proposed action located in,or does it adjoin,a state listed Critical Environmental Area? NO YES If Yes,identify: ✓❑ ❑ NO YES 8. a. Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels? ✓❑ ❑ b. Are public transportation services available at or near the site of the proposed action? ✓❑ ❑ c. Are any pedestrian accommodations or bicycle routes available on or near the site of the proposed ❑ action? 9. Does the proposed action meet or exceed the state energy code requirements? NO Y E S If the proposed action will exceed requirements,describe design features and technologies: ❑ ✓❑ 10. Will the proposed action connect to an existing public/private water supply? NO YES If No,describe method for providing potable water: 11. Will the proposed action connect to existing wastewater utilities? NO YES If No,describe method for providing wastewater treatment: ❑ ❑✓ 12. a.Does the project site contain,or is it substantially contiguous to,a building,archaeological site,or district NO YES which is listed on the National or State Register of Historic Places,or that has been determined by the ❑ Commissioner of the NYS Office of Parks,Recreation and Historic Preservation to be eligible for listing on the State Register of Historic Places? b. Is the project site,or any portion of it,located in or adjacent to an area designated as sensitive for ❑✓ ❑ archaeological sites on the NY State Historic Preservation Office(SHPO)archaeological site inventory? 13. a. Does any portion of the site of the proposed action,or lands adjoining the proposed action,contain NO Y E S wetlands or other waterbodies regulated by a federal,state or local agency? ❑ ❑✓ b.Would the proposed action physically alter,or encroach into,any existing wetland or waterbody? ❑✓ ❑ If Yes,identify the wetland or waterbody and extent of alterations in square feet or acres: Page 2 of 3 14. Identify the typical habitat types that occur on,or are likely to be found on the project site.Check all that apply: ❑Shoreline ❑ Forest ❑Agricultural/grasslands ❑ Early mid-successional ❑Wetland ❑ Urban m Suburban 15. Does the site of the proposed action contain any species of animal,or associated habitats,listed by the State or NO YES Federal government as threatened or endangered? ✓❑ ❑ 16. Is the project site located in the 100-year flood plan? NO YES ❑ a 17. Will the proposed action create storm water discharge,either from point or non-point sources? NO YES If Yes, ❑ ✓❑ a. Will storm water discharges flow to adjacent properties? ❑ ❑✓ b. Will storm water discharges be directed to established conveyance systems(runoff and storm drains)? ❑ If Yes,briefly describe: Rain Garden 18. Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that would result in the impoundment of water NO YES or other liquids(e.g.,retention pond,waste lagoon,dam)? If Yes,explain the purpose and size of the impoundment: ❑ 19. Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the location of an active or closed solid waste NO YES management facility? If Yes,describe: ❑� ❑ 20.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the subject of remediation(ongoing or NO YES completed) for hazardous waste? If Yes,describe: ❑ I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Applicant/sponsor/ e: Daniel Sherman Date: 12/22/20 Signatur&_� - Title: /� PRINT FORM Page 3 of 3 EAF Mapper Summary Report Tuesday, December 22, 2020 2:16 PM Disclaimer: The EAF Mapper is a screening tool intended to assist 129,84.1-16y -1204.P4-1-21 project sponsors and reviewing agencies in preparing an environmental 129.76-1 1 ' assessment form(EAF).Not all questions asked in the EAF are 129.84-1 2�i answered by the EAF Mapper.Additional information on any EAF 12 9.84-1-17 question can be obtained by consulting the EAF Workbooks. Although 130.77 1 1 3 the EAF Mapper provides the most up-to-date digital data available to DEC,you may also need to contact local or other data sources in order -----__- = 129.84-1-19 to obtain data not provided by the Mapper.Digital data is not a 12 9.84-1-2:'. substitute for agency determinations. 129.84-1-18 -------_ Dttanra Montreal 135.2 8-1-38 - r 35.28-1-6 Rye 136.21-1-13 Toronto, -=!` 35.28 1 7 gWt. Him 4„ DRodtebtor —N c�iv Alibany [karat Boston 135.28-1-37 z ii Provtdance � s -_- Glevdsul 4 35.28-1-24 =__ �' ° t' 135.28-1-40 `xr York - _ - ap'Sl CAI mtr . Pittsburgh Philadelphia ar1t13H:+1>yS2bttemiap INCREMENTF4iRfUh Esn Japai' F:IEII.Esn China iHoncl k.m Esn EF:IEIITrP Plk::an Esn Japan HEM,Esn China�Hong Kong Esn Korea Esrr).TUa)IAnIk NGCC to OpatStrelt!OXv�tll and the GISllsatt.,( �t�mlurlt�;.t c(nn()p�tSU'eeiF.lal?o�tttnl��r��i�ta�i�te GIS!IserCommutity Part 1 /Question 7 [Critical Environmental No Area] Part 1 /Question 12a [National or State No Register of Historic Places or State Eligible Sites] Part 1 /Question 12b [Archeological Sites] No Part 1 /Question 13a [Wetlands or Other Yes - Digital mapping information on local and federal wetlands and Regulated Waterbodies] waterbodies is known to be incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. Part 1 /Question 15 [Threatened or No Endangered Animal] Part 1 /Question 16 [100 Year Flood Plain] Yes Part 1 /Question 20 [Remediation Site] Yes Short Environmental Assessment Form - EAF Mapper Summary Report DANIEL SHERMAN LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, P.C. 4 Broadway, Suite 9 Valhalla, NY 10595 914-824-0999 Fax: 914-824-0251 dsherman4@optonline.net www.danshermanlandscape.com April 13, 2022 Re: Mailing and Sign Posting for Planning Board review re: 18 Hillandale Rd for the meeting of April 21, 2022 This letter will confirm that we sent registered letters to the neighbors within 250' of the property on Friday April 8th, 2022. The list and notice accompany this letter. Respectfully, V Daniel ShermanLandscape Architect 14 2022 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK BUILDING DEPARTMENT ;r-Ly HyukJong Lee State of New Jersey it ^'Ci' Notary Public Commission No.50169466 My Commission Expires 8/23/2026 Yj q/ lq- l 2D'-.- DANIEL SHERMAN LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, P.C. 4 Broadway, Suite 9 Valhalla, NY 10595 914-824-0999 Fax: 914-824-0251 dsherman4@optonline.net www.danshermanlandscape.com April 13, 2022 Re: Sign Posting for Planning Board review re: 18 Hillandale Rd for the meeting of April 21, 2022 This letter will confirm that the public notice sign for the planning board was posted on the front of the property on April 13, 2022 Respectfully, Daniel Sherman Landscape Architect 1 C Hyukjong Lee x^° State of New Jersey Notary Public commission No.50169466 My Commission Exgres 8/2312026 61 (C/ 6��/zo-W- (7 w Z Ll H Z 2 F- W z Q H U g cn � � Q m w Q J Q a = Q 2 cc 0 = m o Q < O LL m l7 w Q w o0 J Z H � cn p ko Z zJIZ Za > z0o Z Y LU Zap 0 0Q U 0 0 rn " ° Z \ ]C co Y 2 ::) d ~ 0 00 w m M J z � O W °C a m LL, ? O a = Q Q m U C) Q Z LU • � Q o � J CO o J a CO 0 0 Q Q K � 1 Village of Rye Brook Planning Board Rye Brook,New York AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING In the matter of the application for Amended Site Plan Approval �/J 18 Hillandale Road E((�_v E � v E (Property Address) MAY - 6 2022 DD 135.28-1-39 (Tax Map ID Number) VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK BUILDING DEPARTMENT The undersigned, Daniel Marks , being duly sworn hereby deposes and says: 1. I am over the age of 18 years of age and am a resident of the State of New York 2. That on May 2- . 2022 , in anticipation of the Public Hearing on May 12, 2022 ,public notice signs were posted at the referenced addresses to reflect the Public Hearing in accordance with the Village of Rye Brook's Zoning Ordinance. Photographs were taken on May 2 , 2022 showing the sign and the location, copies of which are attached. (Signature) Daniel Marks (Printed Name) NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: Sworn to before me this 5 r-day of May, 2022 NOTARY-PUBLIC OEM ALEXANDER RADICE SR NOTARY PUBLIC CONNECTICUT MY COMMISSION EXPIRES NOVEMBER 30,2022 5210588.0 PUBLI � NOTICE A PUBLIC HEARING / MEETING FOR A PLANNING BOARD APPLICATION WILL BE HELD BY THE RYE BROOK PLANNING BOARD AT THE RYE BROOK VILLAGE HALL, 938 KING STREET. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVALIABLE AT THE RYEBROOK BUILDING DEPARTMENT (914) 939-0668. r r. ECENE EMA� Y 2 5 2022 Village of Rye Brook Planning Board VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK Rye Brook New York AFFIDAVIT EPARTMENT In the matter of the application for Amended Site Plan Approval 18 HillancWc Road (Property Address) 135.28-1-39 (Tax Map ID Number) The undersigned, Daniel Marks being duly sworn hereby deposes and says: l. I am over the age of 18 years of age and am a resident of the State of New York 2. That on Mav 19 , 2022 , in anticipation of the Public Hearing on June 9. 2022 public notice signs were posted at the referenced addresses to reflect the Public Hearing in accordance with the Village of Rye Brook's Zoning Ordinance. Photographs were taken on May 19 . 2022 showing the sign and the location, copies of which are attached. (Signature) Daniel Marks (Printed Name) NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: Sworn to before me this X5 day of*prit, 2022 NOTARY PUBLIC SHARI MELILLO Notary Public,State of New York No.O1ME6160063 Qualified In Westchester County Commission Expires January 29,20Z_ PUBLIC NOTICE A PUBLIC HEARING / MEETING FOR A PLANNING BOARD APPLICATION WILL BE HELD BY THE RYE BROOK PLANNING BOARD Al :30 P. M . AT THE RYE BROOK VILLAGE HALL, 938 KING STREET. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVALIABLE AT THE RYEBROOK BUILDING DEPARTMENT (914) 939-0668. A. Village of Rye Brook Planning Board Rye Brook, New York AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING In the matter of the application for Amended Site Plan Approval 18 Hillandale Road (Property Address) 135.28-1-39 (Tax Map ID Number) The undersigned, Daniel Marks ,being duly sworn hereby deposes and says: l. I am over the age of 18 years of age and am a resident of the State of New York 2. That on June 19 2022 , in anticipation of the Public Hearing on July 14, 2022 , public notice signs were posted at the referenced addresses to reflect the Public Hearing in accordance with the Village of Rye Brook's Zoning Ordinance. Photographs were taken on June 19 2022 showing the sign and the location, copies of which are attached. (Signature) Daniel Marks (Printed Name) NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: Sworn to before me this day of June, 2022 NOTARY PUBLIC p (� W CHRISTOPHER J.BRADBURY Fj No.01BR6159985 UN 2 4 2022 ID Notary Public,State New York VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK oualified in Westchester Countt BUILDING DEPARTMENT Commission Expires January 29,20 g -L � T f a r„►.�A:;+�i'e�C•a ;t�-lt!t,�.X„K�'4o+��ii �;:1i�\\. �i:ta. � �.'��i����£.. �� �. � r Y Village of Rye Brook Planning Board Rye Brook, New York AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING In the matter of the application for Amended Site Plan Approval 18 Hillandale Road (Property Address) 135.28-1-39 (Tax Map ID Number) The undersigned, Yael Marks , being duly sworn hereby deposes and says: 1. I am over the age of 18 years of age and am a resident of the State of New York 2. That on July 15 , 2022 , in anticipation of the Public Hearing on July 28, 2022 , public notice signs were posted at the referenced addresses to reflect the Public Hearing in accordance with the Village of Rye Brook's Zoning Ordinance. Photographs were taken on July 15 , 2022 showing the sign and the location, copies of which are att hed. (Sign re) Yael Marks (Printed Name) NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: Sworn to before me this 18--day of July, 2022 NOTARY PUB IC D V �� ID CHRISTOPHER J.BRADBURY 1UL 220 22 Notary Public,State of New York No.01 BR6159985 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK Qualified in Westchester county BUILDING DEPARTMENT Commission Expires January 29,20 --- V'. - 1 lip op AA Ad r '1 �' +► 1 z r . �i. Mailing Labels for Property Addresses.Created from Municipal Tax Parcel Viewer htto://aiswww.westchesteroov.co -_1407r� Fischer Philip-Stephanie Fischer Wolf,John-Rita Wolf Heinberg,Jack L-Melissa P Heinberg 37 Hillandale Rd 33 Hillandale Rd 780 King St PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 Kamin Robin G Moschitto,Joseph-Wanda Moschitto Abramson Erika L-Marc A Abramson 39 Hillandale Rd 41 Hillandale Rd 47 Hillandale Rd PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 Marks,Daniel Steven-Yael Mayrav Harmon,Mark-Ellen Harmon Zuckerman Gary Marks 16 Hillandale Rd 29 Hillandale Rd 18 Hillandale Rd PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 Greiner,Stephen-Marily Greiner Gardner,Barry-Jack Fuchs Hollander,Douglas S-Gail E Hollander 43 Hillandale Rd 20 Hillandale Rd 35 Hillandale Rd PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 Meiri Noah-Renee Rosen Steinberg Richard-Jacqueline Settanni Lawrence-Cristina Settanni 6 Hillandale Rd Steinberg 22 Hillandale Rd PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 24 Hillandale Rd PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 Gardner,Barry-Jack Fuchs Loewenstein,David A-Myra K 20 Hillandale Rd Loewenstein PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 802 King St PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 Created on: 12/22/2020 Page 1 of 1 ain Office KEANEMBEANEPC. '44 Hamilton Avenue ATTORNEYS AT LAW White PWns,NY 10601 Phone 914.946.4777 Fax 914.946.6M8 MEMORANDUM ■Mid-Hudson Office 200 Westage Business Center FishK NY 12524 Phone 845.896.0120 TO: Chairman Goodman and ■New York City Office505 Park Avenue Members of the Planning Board New York,NY 10022 of the Village of Rye Brook Phone 646.794.5747 FROM: Drew Victoria Gamils, Esq. RE: 18 Hillandale Road- Site Plan Changes DATE: February 9, 2022 On February 11, 2021, the Planning Board granted site plan and wetland permit approvals for the construction of an in-ground swimming pool, retaining walls, deck renovations and a pergola on property known as 18 Hillandale Road. The Applicant has filed an application for amended site plan approval to legalize improvements and construction on the property that fails to comply with the originally approved site plan. The Applicant cannot obtain a certificate of occupancy until the work complies with an approved site plan. This memorandum provides a chart to summarize the work performed on the property that fails to comply with the originally approved site Ian. 2021 Site Plan— 2022 Site Plan Approved Amendment Pool Filter Location The approved plans The pool filter was placed shows the pool filter below the rain garden located at the north side retaining wall 11'-3" from of the house. the property line,located at the mid-section of the south property line Landscaping A plant list was approved Several varieties of with the site plan. plantings were Plantings were required substituted, and additional ranging in height from 4 plan material was installed feet to 9 feet. 12,900 along the rear south square feet of new property line. Most of the plantings are required on- plants installed are about site. 4 or 5 feet tall. Plants are also placed in the wrong location. WWW.KBLAW.COM KEANEMBEANEPC. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 2021 Site Plan— 2022 Site Plan Approved Amendment Fencing The approved site plan The pool enclosure was shows the pool enclosure installed around the top fence to be the existing of the retaining wall. A 4- chain link fence at the foot black iron fence was south, east and north installed. perimeters of the rear yard. The fence was a 4- foot spur rail fence with wire mesh to meet pool code. No fencing was proposed on top of the retaining wall. Rain Garden Rain garden was reduced in size. Retaining Wall The retaining wall was The wall was constructed designed at a height of 8'. at a height of 4-foot. Nine cultec storage chambers were added to the site. Proposed wood deck Plans called for a wood Proposed wood deck was deck to be constructed removed from the site and connected to the plan. existing wood deck. Hardesty 555 Theodore Fremd Ave.,Suite C-301 Rye, NY 10580 &Hanover T:914.967.6540 www.hardestyhanover.com R [EC� COM[E MEMORANDUM FEB - 4 2022 0 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK To: Robert I. Goodman, Chairman, and the BUILDING DEPARTMENT Planning Board of the Village of Rye Brook Date: February 4, 2022 Subject: Marks Residence— 18 Hillandale Road —Application for Approval of an Amended Site Plan As requested,we have reviewed applications, correspondence and plans submitted by Daniel Sherman, RLA, on behalf of the property owners, Daniel Marks and Yael Marks for approval of an Amended Site Plan for landscaping modifications, pool filter location and fencing on the property located at 18 Hillandale Road, SBL 135.28-1-39 on the Town of Rye Tax Map, in the R-25 Zoning District. Property Description The 44,478 square-foot property is currently developed with a two-story residence with a deck, in-ground swimming pool, walkways, driveway and curb cut. Review We have reviewed application materials and plans that include the following items: 1. Short Environmental Assessment Form and EAF Mapper Summary Report dated 12/22/20; 2. Application for Site Plan Approval; 3. Site Plan Submittal Review Checklist; 4. Application to Amend Approved Plans; 5. The following landscape plans generally entitled, "Marks Residence" prepared Daniel Sherman, RLA, last revised 1/19/22: a. Sheet L-1, "Overall Site Plan & Construction Details," b. Sheet L-2, "Site Plan (Pool)," C. Sheet L-3, "Mitigation Planting;" d. Sheet M-1, "Mitigation Planting (Off-Site)," dated 2/3/21; e. Sheet L-5, "Wall Section;" 6. A Site Survey prepared by Ramsay Land Surveying, LLC dated 11/20/21. Hardesty &Hanover engineering that moves you Please note that our review is limited to planning and environmental issues. We offer the following comments regarding the application: 1. SEQRA. The Proposed Action is a Type II action with regard to SEQR because it involves the construction of minor accessory/appurtenant residential structures, including garages, carports, patios, decks, swimming pools, tennis courts, satellite dishes, fences, barns, storage sheds or other buildings not changing land use or density. 2. Wetland Mitigation Plantings. As part of the Site Plan and Wetlands Permit approvals granted in February 2021, the area of disturbance within the wetland buffer was 9,296 square feet which required 18,592 square feet of mitigation. The approved mitigation plan had 12,900 square feet of new plantings on-site and 5,692 square feet of off-site mitigation to satisfy the mitigation requirement. The application materials note that the site plan amendment includes adjustments that were made to the approved mitigation plantings. They note that several varieties of plantings were substituted, and plant sizes were reduced due to availability. The Application should be revised to include a list of the approved plant species, sizes and quantities and the plant species, sizes, and quantities that were planted so that it can be determined if the replacement species are an appropriate substitute for the wetland plantings required as part of the approved mitigation plan. We look forward to discussion with the Board. Sarah L. Brown, AICP Principal Planner cc: Honorable Mayor and the Village Board of Trustees Christopher Bradbury, Village Administrator Michal Nowak, Superintendent of Public Works/Village Engineer Drew Victoria Gamils, Esq., Village Attorney Daniel Sherman, RLA, for the Applicant Y:1SharedlOfficesWYROataVocuments\DOCS215001Rye6rookk4979.0218 Hillandale Rd Amended Site Plan.docx a rdesty, 555 Theodore Fremd Ave.,Suite C-301 Rye, NY 10580 &Hanover T:914.967.6540 www.hardestyhanover.com D F"CCNE 03 MEMORANDUM MAR - 4 2022 To: Robert I. Goodman, Chairman, and the VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK Planning Board of the Village of Rye Brook BUILDING DEPARTMENT Date: March 4, 2022 Subject: Marks Residence— 18 Hillandale Road —Application for Approval of an Amended Site Plan As requested,we have reviewed applications, correspondence and plans submitted by Daniel Sherman, RLA, on behalf of the property owners, Daniel Marks and Yael Marks for approval of an Amended Site Plan for landscaping modifications, pool filter location and fencing on the property located at 18 Hillandale Road, SBL 135.28-1-39 on the Town of Rye Tax Map, in the R-25 Zoning District. Property Description The 44,478 square-foot property is currently developed with a two-story residence with a deck, in-ground swimming pool, walkways, driveway and curb cut. Review We have reviewed application materials and plans that include the following items: 1. Short Environmental Assessment Form and EAF Mapper Summary Report dated 12/22/20; 2. Application for Site Plan Approval; 3. Site Plan Submittal Review Checklist; 4. Application to Amend Approved Plans; 5. The following landscape plans generally entitled, "Marks Residence" prepared Daniel Sherman, RLA, last revised 1/19/22: a. Sheet L-1, "Overall Site Plan & Construction Details," b. Sheet L-2, "Site Plan (Pool)," C. Sheet L-3, "Mitigation Planting;" d. Sheet M-1, "Mitigation Planting (Off-Site)," dated 2/3/21; e. Sheet L-5, "Wall Section;" 6. A Site Survey prepared by Ramsay Land Surveying, LLC dated 11/20/21. &Hanover engineering that moves you Please note that our review is limited to planning and environmental issues. We offer the following comments regarding the application: 1. SEQRA. The Proposed Action is a Type II action with regard to SEQR because it involves the construction of minor accessory/appurtenant residential structures, including garages, carports, patios, decks, swimming pools, tennis courts, satellite dishes, fences, barns, storage sheds or other buildings not changing land use or density. 2. Wetland Mitigation Plantings. As part of the Site Plan and Wetlands Permit approvals granted in February 2021, the area of disturbance within the wetland buffer was 9,296 square feet which required 18,592 square feet of mitigation. The approved mitigation plan had 12,900 square feet of new plantings on-site and 5,692 square feet of off-site mitigation to satisfy the mitigation requirement. The application materials note that the site plan amendment includes adjustments that were made to the approved mitigation plantings. In most cases, only the size of the planting changed with the species and quantity staying the same. Based on our review, we note the following changes in mitigation plantings: Species Size Originally Size Installed Quantity Quantity Approved Approved Installed Trees Servicebe 6-7 ft. 34 ft. 3 3 River Birch 9-10 ft. 6-7 ft. 4 4 Red Bud 8-9 ft. 6-7 ft. 1 1 Dogwood 8-9 ft. 6-7 ft. 2 2 Holly 6-7 ft. 34 ft. 6 6 Amer. Holly 7-8 ft. 5 ft. 4 4 Hemlock 8-10 ft. 7-8 ft. 2 5 Shrubs Azalea 34 ft. 3 gallon 1-3 ft. 3 3 Button Bush 34 ft. 3 gallon 1-3 ft. 5 5 Clethra 5 gallon 3 gallon 8 8 Dogwood 4-5 ft. 3 gallon 1-3 ft. 15 8 Forsythia 4-5 ft. 3 gallon 1-3 ft. 15 12 Various Hydrangea Sp. 5-10 gallon 3-10 gallon 15 11 Spice Bush 5 gallon 5 gallon 5 3 Andromeda 34 ft. 3 gallon 1-3 ft. 6 6 Lilac 5-6 ft. 5 gallon 2-5 ft. 1 1 Various Vbumum 4-5 ft. 1-7 ft. 21 21 Hardesty &Hanover engineering that moves you The above table provides shading where the quantities have changed from the previously approved plan. It should also be noted that the Applicant has added 3 Eastern Red Cedar trees (7-8 feet in height) and 18 Growl-ow Sumac plantings to the amended mitigation plan. The area of planting has not been decreased from the previously approved plan. For the purposes of mitigation, the reduced size of the plantings does not have the same impact as if the plantings were being used for screening or noise reduction. The mitigation plan still restores the buffer area, however, it will take longer to reach maturity. 3. Landscape Screening. With the relocation of the pool filter equipment, the wetland mitigation plantings in this area are now also serving as landscape screening for the equipment. The reduced size of the plantings will affect the level of screening that the landscaping will provide until they reach a level of maturity. The table below notes the installed size of the plantings in the area of the pool equipment and the average growth rate of those plantings to give the Board an estimate of the time it will take for the plantings to provide better screening. Species Size Installed Average Growth Rate Dragon Lady Holly 4 ft. 8-10 inches per year American Holly 5 ft. 1 foot per year Canadian Hemlock 7-8 ft. 1 foot er year Eastern Red Cedar 7-8 ft. 1-2 feet per year Skip Laurel 4 ft. 2 feet per year Viburnum 1 1-3 ft. 1 2 feet per year We look forward to discussion with the Board. Sarah L. Brown, AICP Principal Planner cc: Honorable Mayor and the Village Board of Trustees Christopher Bradbury, Village Administrator Michal Nowak, Superintendent of Public Works/Village Engineer Drew Victoria Gamils, Esq., Village Attorney Daniel Sherman, RLA, for the Applicant P�)rdesty 555 Theodore Fremd Ave.,Suite C-301 Rye, NY 10580 &Hanover T:914.967.6540 www.hardestyhanover.com MEMORANDUM 03 APR 18 2022 To: Robert I. Goodman, Chairman, and the VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK Planning Board of the Village of Rye Brook BUILDING DEPARTMENT Date: April 15, 2022 Subject: Marks Residence— 18 Hillandale Road —Application for Approval of an Amended Site Plan As requested,we have reviewed applications, correspondence and plans submitted by Daniel Sherman, RLA, on behalf of the property owners, Daniel Marks and Yael Marks for approval of an Amended Site Plan for landscaping modifications, pool filter location and fencing on the property located at 18 Hillandale Road, SBL 135.28-1-39 on the Town of Rye Tax Map, in the R-25 Zoning District. Property Description The 44,478 square-foot property is currently developed with a two-story residence with a deck, in-ground swimming pool, walkways, driveway and curb cut. Review We have reviewed application materials and plans that include the following items: 1. Short Environmental Assessment Form and EAF Mapper Summary Report dated 12/22/20; 2. Application for Site Plan Approval; 3. Site Plan Submittal Review Checklist; 4. Application to Amend Approved Plans; 5. The following landscape plans generally entitled, "Marks Residence" prepared Daniel Sherman, RLA, last revised 3/29/22: a. Sheet L-1, "Overall Site Plan & Construction Details," b. Sheet L-2, "Site Plan (Pool)," C. Sheet L-2A, "Amendment to Mitigation Planting (Side Yard Enlargement), d. Sheet L-3, "Mitigation Planting," e. Sheet M-1, "Mitigation Planting (Off-Site)," f. Sheet L-5, "Wall Section," last revised 2/2/22 6. A Site Survey prepared by Ramsay Land Surveying, LLC dated 11/20/21. Hardesty &Hanover engineering that moves you Please note that our review is limited to planning and environmental issues. We offer the following comments regarding the application: 1. SEQRA. The Proposed Action is a Type II action with regard to SEQR because it involves the construction of minor accessory/appurtenant residential structures, including garages, carports, patios, decks, swimming pools, tennis courts, satellite dishes, fences, barns, storage sheds or other buildings not changing land use or density. 2. Wetland Mitigation Plantings. As part of the Site Plan and Wetlands Permit approvals granted in February 2021, the area of disturbance within the wetland buffer was 9,296 square feet which required 18,592 square feet of mitigation. The approved mitigation plan had 12,900 square feet of new plantings on-site and 5,692 square feet of off-site mitigation to satisfy the mitigation requirement. The application materials note that the site plan amendment includes adjustments that were made to the approved mitigation plantings. In most cases, only the size of the planting changed with the species and quantity staying the same. Based on our review,we note the following changes in mitigation plantings: Species Size Originally Size Installed Quantity Quantity Approved Approved Installed Trees Serviceber 6-7 ft. 3-4 ft. 3 3 River Birch 9-10 ft. 6-7 ft. 4 4 Red Bud 8-9 ft. 6-7 ft. 1 1 Dogwood 8-9 ft. 6-7 ft. 2 2 Holly 6-7 ft. 34 ft. 6 6 Amer. Holly 7-8 ft. 5 ft. 4 4 Hemlock 8-10 ft. 7-8 ft. 2 5 Shrubs Azalea 34 ft. 3 gallon 1-3 ft. 3 3 Button Bush 34 ft. 3 gallon 1-3 ft. 5 5 Clethra 5 gallon 3 gallon 8 8 Dogwood 4-5 ft. 3 gallon 1-3 ft. 15 8 Forsythia 4-5 ft. 3 gallon 1-3 ft. 15 12 Various Hydrangea Sp. 5-10 gallon 3-10 gallon 15 11 Spice Bush 5 gallon 5 gallon 5 3 Andromeda 34 ft. 3 gallon 1-3 ft. 6 6 Lilac 5-6 ft. 5 gallon 2-5 ft. 1 1 Various Vibumum 4-5 ft. 1-7 ft. 21 21 Hardesty &Hanover engineering that moves you The above table provides shading where the quantities have changed from the previously approved plan. It should also be noted that the Applicant has added 3 Eastern Red Cedar trees (7-8 feet in height) and 18 Growl-ow Sumac plantings to the amended mitigation plan. The area of planting has not been decreased from the previously approved plan. For the purposes of mitigation, the reduced size of the plantings does not have the same impact as if the plantings were being used for screening or noise reduction. The mitigation plan still restores the buffer area, however, it will take longer to reach maturity. 3. Landscape Screening. With the relocation of the pool filter equipment, the wetland mitigation plantings in this area are now also serving as landscape screening for the equipment. The reduced size of the plantings will affect the level of screening that the landscaping will provide until they reach a level of maturity. The table below notes the installed size of the plantings in the area of the pool equipment and the average growth rate of those plantings to give the Board an estimate of the time it will take for the plantings to provide better screening. Species Size Installed Average Growth Rate Dragon Lady Holly 4 ft. 8-10 inches per year American Holly 5 ft. 1 foot per year Canadian Hemlock 7-8 ft. 1 foot per year Eastern Red Cedar 7-8 ft. 1-2 feet per year Skip Laurel 4 ft. 2 feet per year Viburnum 1-3 ft. 1 2 feet per year On March 15, 2022, our office met with the Applicant's Landscape Architect at the site to discuss the planting and changes that could be made to provide better screening of the pool, pool equipment and pool fence. As discussed at the meeting, the landscaping plan has been revised to add 8 Green Giant Arborvitae (8-10 feet in height) and relocate of 2 holly trees to provide additional screening of the pool, pool equipment and surrounding fence. A noise reduction barrier has also been placed around the pool equipment. We look forward to discussion with the Board. Sarah L. Brown, AICP Principal Planner cc: Honorable Mayor and the Village Board of Trustees Christopher Bradbury, Village Administrator Michal Nowak, Superintendent of Public Works/Village Engineer Hardesty &Hanover engineering that moves you Drew Victoria Gamils, Esq., Village Attorney Daniel Sherman, RLA, for the Applicant 570 Taxter Road,Suite 300 Dolph Rodeld Engineering (914)63;8600 Phone (914) 631-5769 fax An ®Engineers Company www.drepc.com www.aiengineers.com TO: Mr. Michal Nowak D L�2 C l� �V/ II Village of Rye Brook FROM: James Natarelli, P.E. JUL 3 ZOZZ IP DATE: July 13, 2022 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK BUILDING DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: 18 Hillandale Road Site Plan Application In reference to the above-mentioned project,this office has received (on July 7,2022) and reviewed the following: 1. Memo and Hydro CAD Stormwater Model prepared by Christopher S. Utschig, P.E. dated June 3, 2022 revised July 7, 2022; 2. Site Plan prepared by Christopher S. Utschig, P.E. dated December 14, 2020 revised June 9, 2022. With respect to the proposed stormwater management design demonstrated on the submitted plans and report our comments are as follows but are not limited to: 1. Drainage Area (DA) numbering must be consistent between the stormwater model and the corresponding site plan. 2. The model indicates that DA 1 (DA 3 on plan),which includes roof areas, is tributary to the infiltration system (Cultec chambers). Plan must demonstrate how the roof areas (that appear to have been excluded from DA 2 on the plan) are routed to the infiltration system. 3. The model indicates that DA 2,which includes roof and driveway areas, is tributary to the retention pond. Plan must demonstrate how these areas are routed to the pond. 4. The model indicates that the existing drainage area has a time of concentration (Tc) of 15 minutes. Supporting information for this value must be provided as a high Tc value tends to skew model results. 5. The model indicates that DA 1 (DA 3 on plan) has a time of concentration (Tc) of 15 minutes. Supporting information for this value must be provided as a high Tc value tends to skew model results. 6. The model indicates that DA 3 (DA 1 on plan) has a time of concentration (Tc)of 15 minutes. Supporting information for this value must be provided as a high Tc value tends to skew model results. 7. The model indicates that DA 2 consists only of impervious area, which according to the plan appears to be most of the house and the entire driveway. Please confirm the size and square footage of this area and that it is consistent between the model and the plan. Improving Life. By Design. Mr.Nowak Rye Brook Planning Board Engineers veers 18 Hillandale Road—Site Plan Application July 13,2022 Page 2 8. The infiltration system (Cultec chambers) has been modeled with a 4-inch culvert (at the bottom of the system) and an 8-inch culvert(near the top of the system) as outlet devices. However, the plan only shows a 4-inch "overflow set elevation at top of cultec". Outlet devices and elevations must be consistent between the model and the plan. 9. All pipe invert elevations must be indicated on the plan. 10. Supporting information must be provided for the exfiltration rates used in the model for both the infiltration system and the retention basin. 11. The retention system has been modeled with a 2-inch orifice as an outlet device. However,the plan shows a 1-inch orifice in the "Underdrain X-Section". The outlet device must be consistent between the model and the plan. 12. The retention system has been modeled with a 4'Lx3'W weir. However,the plan indicates a 4'Wx4'Lx6"D weir. The weir dimensions must be consistent between the model and the plan. 13. The retention system has been modeled with a weir at elevation 161.95. However, the plan indicates a 6-inch deep weir at elevation 161.95 (implying a berm elevation of 162.45) which is not supported by the proposed pond grading. The weir elevation must be consistent between the model and the plan's proposed grading. Upon receipt of amended plans addressing these comments,this office is prepared to continue its review. By Design. p �C� CO�I� 445 Hamilton Avenue, 14th Floor CUDDY DD White Plains, New York 10601 +F E D E R APR - 7 2022 T 914 7611300 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK F 914 7615372 LLP BUILDING DEPARTMENT cuddyfeder.com Allison Fausner, Esq. afausner(&cuddyfeder.com April 7, 2022 VIA HAND AND EMAIL Chairman Robert Goodman and Members of the Planning Board Village of Rye Brook 938 King Street Rye Brook,New York 10573 Re: Daniel Marks—Amended Site Plan Application—Supplemental Submission Premises: 18 Hillandale Road,Village of Rye Brook,New York(Tax ID: 135.28-1-3-c)) Dear Chairman Goodman and Members of the Planning Board: On behalf of Daniel Marks (the "Applicant"), we are pleased to submit this letter and referenced enclosures in furtherance of the Applicant's pending application for Amended Site Plan Approval in connection with the existing in-ground swimming pool, ancillary equipment, fence, stormwater measures, and landscaping improvements for the property located at 18 Hillandale Road in the Village of Rye Brook, New York (the "Premises").' The Applicant submits that the existing minor modifications detailed herein are consistent with the site plan criteria as set forth in Zoning Code Section 209-4 and ongoing use of the Premises and respectfully requests this Board consider granting Amended Site Plan Approval. As discussed with this Board at the March 10, 2022 meeting, the Applicant is proposing to legalize the improvements and construction on the Premises that relate to the existing pool filter,landscaping and screening,fencing, retaining wall,and rain garden.2 Since last appearing before this Board,the Applicant has diligently worked to respond to this Board's and the public's comments and concerns, as detailed further below. Pool Equipment,Landscaping The pool filter and associated equipment are currently located on the southern portion of the Premises,midway along the southern property line and directly adjacent to the in-ground swimming pool and retaining wall. Of note, it is located 11'4' from the adjacent property. Although this 1 Note:The Planning Board previously granted Site Plan and Wetlands Permits approvals on February ii, 2021,for the construction of an in-ground swimming pool,retaining walls,deck renovations,and pergola on the Premises. 2 Note:The previously approved wooden deck has been eliminated from the Site Plan and the rain garden was reduced in size. Nine (9) cultec storage chambers were added to the Premises for stormwater management, north of the in-ground pool in coordination with the Village Engineer. See enclosed Landscape Plan Set,Sheet L-1&L-2. WESTCHESTER i NEW PORK CITY , HUCSON VALLEY ! CONNECTICJT 5177414.0 #'CUDDY +FEDER LLP 04/7/2022 Page 2 equipment was previously proposed on the northern portion of the Premises, adjacent to the residential dwelling, relocation to the original location is not tenable given the elevation of the original location. At the onset of construction,the Applicant's pool contractor,Cardillo Pools&Spas, verified that the elevation of the original pool equipment location was higher than shown on the previously approved plans. As noted in the attached letter from Cardillo Pools & Spas, the pool equipment and filter must be located at or near the elevation and within range of the pool to properly operate. See Exhibit B- Letter prepared by Cardillo Pools&Spa, dated April 4, 2022. Moreover, relocating the pool equipment to a different location is not feasible for the Applicant. First, any relocation would result in unnecessary disturbance to the Premises and wetland buffer. Indeed, relocation would require the Applicant to retrench significant portions of the Premises in order to dig up and reconfigure the existing gas and electric lines and connections to the pool filter equipment. Second, the only other feasible location found on the Premises would place the pool equipment closer to the southern property line and the abutting neighbor's property. Thus, the equipment's current location is the least impactful that would also allow proper operation of the equipment. In order to fully mitigate any impact of the pool equipment relocation, the Applicant implemented various measures. Regarding visual impacts, the Applicant planted and will continue to add additional significant foliage to screen the equipment from adjoining properties. In November 2021, for instance,nine(9)trees,three(3)6'-7'Viburnums,three(3)6'-7'Cedar Eastern Red Brodies,and three (3) 7'-8' Hemlocks were planted in and around the area where the pool filter and equipment are situated.After the March 10, 2022 Planning Board meeting,the Applicant's landscape architect met with the Town's consultant,Hardesty&Hanover,at the Premises to discuss additional plantings. As a result of this meeting, the Applicant will plant eight (8) additional Arborvitaes, which upon planting will range from 8' to io' tall, around the pool filter location. See enclosed Landscape Plan Set,Sheet L-2&L-2A. In addition to the landscaping, the Applicant is proposing a two (2)-sided pool filter enclosure comprised of a 5' tall vinyl fence and QBO sound cancelling blanket. See Exhibit A — Pool Filter Enclosure Details&QBO Blanket Spec Data Sheet.The QBO Blanket creates a sound barrier between the pool filer and surrounding area, absorbing excess noise and disturbances. With these sound dampening measures, it is anticipated that the pool filter will not be audible at the property boundary. Fence.Retaining Wall The Premises are also improved with a modest 4'tall black aluminum picket fence enclosing the in- ground swimming pool,which reaches 7'tall upon certain sections situated above the retaining wall. In accordance with the Village's Code and to eliminate the need for any variance relief,the Applicant is coordinating to lower portions of the fence to 3'on the sections situated upon the retaining wall so that the total height is reduced to 6'. 5177414A rCUDDY +FEDER LLP 04/7/2022 Page 3 In order to comply with the change in color and materials from the Applicant's prior approvals,the Applicant plans on reappearing in front of the Architectural Review Board following the Planning Board process. While the Applicant acknowledge that the fence was not included in the original Planning Board Approval,such exclusion was an unintended omission.The fence was shown on the drawings reviewed and approved by the Architectural Review Board.The Applicant has two children, both under the age of five, and always intended to protect them by erecting a fence around the swimming pool. Although the Applicant already has a fence around the perimeter of the yard, this fence will enable the Applicant to contain his young children outside of the swimming area,thereby keeping them away from the pool and safeguarding them from danger. To the extent the fence is visible by the surrounding properties, the Applicant respectfully submits that the proposed, high- quality fence seamlessly incorporates the aesthetics of the neighborhood as the existing fence color and materials are similar to those used by surrounding neighbors.Accordingly, the proposed fence is wholly consistent with the character of the neighborhood and,of the utmost importance here,will implement necessary safety measures on the Premises. Stormwater Finally,in response to comments regarding potential stormwater runoff and build-up of debris along the southern, rear corner of the Premises, the Applicant has coordinated site visits with the Village Engineer. Following those visits and consultation with the Village Engineer, the Applicant's landscape contractor redirected a small swale that had been leading water along the southern property line of the Premises directly to the stream that, in instances of heavier rainfall, could have led to water spilling off into the direction of the abutting property.The swale has been redirected so that it will flow entirely into the rain garden. See Exhibit C — Images of the Stormwater Runoff Improvements. Conclusion In furtherance of the Applicant's supplemental submission, enclosed please find four (4) copies of the following materials: Exhibit A: Pool Filter Enclosure Details&QBO Blanket Spec Data Sheet; Exhibit B: Letter prepared by Cardillo Pools&Spa,dated April 4, 2022; and Exhibit C: Images of the Stormwater Runoff Improvements. In addition,the Applicant encloses four(4)signed and sealed copies of the following documents: - Revised Landscape Plans prepared by Daniel Sherman, RLA, dated November 11, 2020, last revised March 29, 2022,including the following sheets: L-1 Overall Site Plan&Construction Details 5177414.0 O'CUDDY +FEDER LLP A 04/7/2022 Page 4 L-2 Amendment to Mitigation Planting L-2A Amendment to Mitigation Planting(Side Yard Enlargement) L-3 Wall Section M-1 Mitigation Planting(Off-Site) - As-Built Survey prepared by Ronald Persaud, L.S.,dated December 8, 2021. The Applicant looks forward to appearing before the Planning Board on April 21, 2022 for the continued Public Hearing, at which point the Applicant respectfully request this Board consider approving the Amended Site Plan Application. Should the Planning Board or Village Staff have any questions in the interim,please feel free to contact the undersigned.Thank you in advance for your consideration. Respectfully submitted, Allison Fausner Enclosures cc: Michael Izzo,Village Building and Fire Inspector Michal J.Nowak,Village Engineer Drew Gamils, Esq.,Village Attorney Sarah L. Brown,AICP, Hardesty&Hanover Daniel Marks,Applicant Daniel Sherman, RLA Lucia Chiocchio, Esq., Cuddy&Feder, LLP 5177414A et A Exhi i p E c E,_ ww APR - 7 2022 -1D VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK BUILDING DEPARTMENT DANIEL SHERMAN POOL FILTER ENCLOSURE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MARKS RESIDENCE 4 BROADWAY SUITE 9 18 HILLANDALE ROAD VALHALLA, NY 10595 RYE BROOK, NY o POOL FILTER WITH \\\J 5' HIGH SCREEN /IV 2 x FENCE ENCLOSURE �0 ill ►i/ n 5' HIGH VINYL FENCE ENCLOSURE - GREY WOOD FINISH r t . j( 'a A ' F— QBO SOUND CANCELLING BLANKET For stationary noise sources outside, including generators, pumps, air conditioners, pool pumps, compressors, construction sites, I , outdoor kennel runs and more, these outdoor sound barrier blankets are the perfect solution to unwanted noise. The QBO Blankets - ✓yr hold up in the weather and combat the bleed of noise to residential neighbors. They are custom cut to match the cavity size of a frame or fencing system surrounding your noise source, and are easy to attach / detach for ease QBO SOUND CANCELLING in maintenance. BLANKET QBO Blanket Spec Data Sheet Exterior Noise Barrier/Sound Absorber Composite NetWell's QBO Blankets offer the benefits of both a sound absorber and noise barrier for outdoor applications. This exterior noise abatement solution consists of a 2" thick vinyl coated fiberglass quilted sound absorber that is bonded to a 1 lb per square foot reinforced loaded vinyl noise barrier. • Constructed with grommets across top and bottom edges & exterior grade Velcro along the mating edges • Rolls are available 54" wide x 25' long and can be supplied with edges bound or unbound • Available colors: gray or tan • Designed for extended-use outdoor applications i • Class A (or 1) flammability rated per ASTM E84 Applications: QBO Blankets are designed to lower the sound levels heard from stationary noise sources such as generators, pumps, and HVAC equipment, but also used to mitigate noise stemming from construction sites. M Product Data: Description Vinyl coated fiberglass cloth facing / 2"quilted fiberglass / 1lb-psf reinforced loaded vinyl barrier Flammability Class A: Flame Spread: 23 Smoke density: 30 Nominal thickness 2.00 inch Temperature range -200 to +1800 F Standard width 54" wide Roll length Maximum 25' length Weight 1.45 lb psf Acoustical Performance: Sound Transmission Loss OCTAVE BAND FREQUENCIES Hz Product 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 STC QBO 13 20 29 40 50 55 32 ASTM E-90 & E 413 Sound Absorption data OCTAVE BAND FREQUENCIES Hz Product 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 NRC QBO 0.07 0.27 0.96 1.13 1.08 .99 0.85 ASTM C 423 NW NetWell Noise Control 3800 American Blvd. Bloomington,MN 55431 N etWe I I 1-800-638-93SS controlnoise.com Exhibit B CARDILLO POOLS & SPAS www.cardillopools.com April 4, 2022 Re: Marks Residence, 18 Hillandale Road, Rye Brook Lot 13S.28-1-39 Robert Goodman Planning Board Chair 938 King Street Rye Brook, NY 10573 Mr. Goodman; I will be unable to attend the planning board meeting scheduled for April 21, 2022 but can offer an explanation regarding the location of the pool filter equipment located at the above referenced address. The approved plan showed the pool filter equipment to be located at the north end of the house. That was the original intention. At the start of construction setback distances were checked as well as the grades shot for the pool and the filter equipment elevations. The filter location was found to be higher up in elevation than realized when the plan was prepared. To operate properly, the filter must be near to the elevation of the surface of the pool or lower, within the range of the body of water. An alternate location was found to the east of the pool, below the block retaining wall. The configuration of the rain garden basin runs tight to the back of the block retaining wall but left a level space just large enough for the filter equipment. This location met the required side yard setback for the filter equipment. Further north, beyond the rain garden, are the storm water chambers and the limit of disturbance line. Other than further up the property, near to the Marks house and closer to the property to the south, the present location of the filter equipment is the only location possible. Respectfully, Luigi Casale LJ U PO Box 88 New Rochelle. NY 10804 PH: 914.235.0883 FX 914.235.0885 E-Mail ir1),'cardillonnnl- rnrn Ex hibit c Exhibit 1the StormwaterRunoffImprovements Before 1 Improvements: x- "A:y �. ��-; f�,,. .fie. ..�. s,JT. .c{. ,. '�µ�• �:-.y- �. ..a yr, 'K �• a • .:. f: w -,�( ,�' ,•mar ♦a. ,�+, r�__. /a'..�, i B'•� �'�� of Y a� ,�� ti R'' , •v .' 'Y,3''._ ''�` ,�,� "�,_x we �• ''�"F � '' ti};� �.�' ,sue �+� �s� � T J 4 Oslo - t ill ill F11:: t ;T 1 1 1 1 � 1 1 • 1 " ��:� � ti• <�,�.,F, yr• -� . ... t - $.. � � tea.�:A•..� 1.� • I`^ 1 , ,4 .. x •Iuoa sjuauiano.i tUj jjoung aawAit joss jam •Iuoa sluatuano.z IUI jjoun-d jalumiulo}S agl3o sa utul :j Itgigxg 445 Hamilton Avenue,14th Floor OwCUDDY White Plains, New York 10601 +FEDER T 914 7611300 F 914 761 5372 LLP cuddyfeder.com Allison Fausner,Esq. afausner0cuddvfeder.com April 20, 2022 D VIA EMAILDO Chairman Robert Goodman and APR 21 2022 Members of the Planning Board Village of Rye Brook 938 King Street VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK BUILDING DEPARTMENT Rye Brook,New York 10573 Re: Daniel Marks—Amended Site Plan Application—Adjournment Request Premises: 18 Hillandale Road.Village of Rye Brook,New York CTax ID• ins 28-1-gg) Dear Chairman Goodman and Members of the Planning Board: On behalf of Daniel Marks (the"Applicant"),the owner of the above-referenced Premises,this letter is submitted in connection with the Applicant's pending Amended Site Plan Application. We respectfully request that the Planning Board adjourn the above captioned matter currently scheduled for review at this Board's April 21, 2022 meeting Agenda and place it on the Planning Board's May 12,2022 meeting Agenda for continued review. The Applicant respectfully requests an adjournment to discuss the updated plans recently submitted to the Planning Board with the abutting property owners, as requested by this Board at the prior meeting date. The Applicant looks forward to appearing at this Board's May 12,2022 meeting Agenda for continued review. In the interim, should this Board or Village Staff have any questions or comments in connection with this matter, please do not hesitate to contact us.Thank you for your consideration. Respectfully submitted, ,4ftsm 57"4Nat Allison Fausner cc: Michael Izzo,Village Building and Fire Inspector Michal J.Nowak,Village Engineer Drew Gamils,Esq.,Village Attorney Sarah L. Brown,AICP, Hardesty&Hanover Daniel Marks,Applicant Daniel Sherman,RLA Lucia Chiocchio, Esq., Cuddy&Feder,LLP WESTCHESTER I NEW YORK CITY I HUDSON VALLEY I CONNECTICUT 445 Hamilton Avenue, 14th Floor rCUDDY White Plains, New York 10601 +FEDER T 914 7611300 F 914 761 5372 LLP , cuddyfeder.com Allison Fausner,Esq. afausner(&cuddvfeder.com April 28,2022 D r— C E_ �V, Il i E \\V//� VIA EMAIL AND FEDEX ll�� Chairman Robert Goodman and APR 2 9 2022 Members of the Planning Board Village of Rye Brook 938 King Street VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK Rye Brook,New York 10573 BUILDING DEPARTMENT Re: Daniel Marks—Amended Site Plan Application—Supplemental Submission Premises: 18 Hillandale Road,Village of Rye Brook,New York(Tax ID: IRS.28-1-3_9) Dear Chairman Goodman and Members of the Planning Board: On behalf of Daniel Marks(the"Applicant"),the owner of the above-referenced Premises,this letter and its referenced enclosure are submitted in connection with the Applicant's pending Amended Site Plan Application. Since last appearing before the Planning Board, the Applicant has diligently worked with his consultants and Village Staff to respond to and remedy this Board's and the public's comments and concerns. On April 19, 2022, the Village Engineer conducted a site visit to review the stormwater runoff improvements that were implemented to redirect a small swale,which had been leading water along the southern property line of the Premises, to the rain garden., Of note, this visit was conducted following a major rain event and it is our understanding that the swale reconfiguration sufficiently directed any stormwater runoff into the rain garden. Further,the Village Engineer approved use of and the Applicant has since installed a geotextile cover in connection with the rain garden in order to stabilize any erosion on the sloped areas. Additionally,in connection the Application,we respectfully submit a letter of support and approval recommendation from the property owners of the northern abutting property, located at 22 Hillandale Road.We would also note that the Applicant continues to discuss the updated plans that were submitted to the Board with the abutting property owners as noted in the Applicant's April 20th adjournment request. The Applicant looks forward to appearing before the Planning Board on May 12, 2022 for the continued Public Hearing, at which point the Applicant respectfully request this Board consider approving the Amended Site Plan Application. Should the Planning Board or Village Staff have any ,Note:The Village Engineer discussed the redirected swale with the Applicant via telephone and did not meet the Applicant on the site to view the improvement prior to the April 19,h site visit. WESTCHESTER I NEW YORK CITY I HUDSON VALLEY I CONNECTICUT 5206517.v2 OwCUDDY +FEDER LLP 04/28/2022 Page 2 questions in the interim,please feel free to contact the undersigned.Thank you in advance for your consideration. Respectfully submitted, vPlllaac 57"4NOc Allison Fausner cc: Michael Izzo,Village Building and Fire Inspector Michal J.Nowak,Village Engineer Drew Gamils,Esq.,Village Attorney Sarah L. Brown,AICP, Hardesty&Hanover Daniel Marks,Applicant Daniel Sherman,RLA Lucia Chiocchio, Esq.,Cuddy&Feder,LLP 5206517.v2 LETTER OF SUPPORT AND APPROVAL RECOMMENDATION Date: ly I Chairman Robert Goodman Members of the Planning Board Village of Rye Brook 938 King Street Rye Brook, New York 10573 Dear Chairman Goodman and Members of the Planning Board: I am (we are) the abutting or neighborhood property owner(s) of the property located at 18 Hillandale Road, Rye Brook,New York 10573(the"Property"),which is classified in the R-25 One-Family Residential District Zoning District and is improved with a one family residence. This letter will serve to confirm that I(we)have had a chance to review the application of Daniel Marks (the "Applicant"), the owner of the above-referenced Property, to the Planning Board of the Village of Rye Brook requesting amended Site Plan Approval to legalize improvements and construction on the Property related to the Applicant's in-ground pool. I(We)have reviewed the application materials and/or have walked the Property and have otherwise become familiar with the Applicant's proposal.This shall confirm that I (we)have no objection to the issuance of the amended Site Plan Approval described above.The proposed use is appropriate in the R-25 Zoning District and on this particular Property. I(We)therefore recommend the Planning Board approve the application described above. Very truly yours, & C� t- I I - Name(s) ffill�-, e W Py A7? Address 5175345.v I DANIEL SHERMAN LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, P.C. 4 Broadway, Suite 9 Valhalla, NY 10595 914-824-0999 Fax: 914-824-0251 Dan.danshermanlandscape@gmail.com www.danshermanianciscape.com January 19, 2022 Robert Goodman - Chair Planning Department JAN :20:21022 Village of Rye Brook VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK 938 King Street BUILDING DEPARTMENT Rye Brook, NY 105'3 Re: Application for amendment to an approved Site Plan 18 Hillandale Road: lot 135-28-1-29 Chair and Board, This letter accompanies our application for amendments to the site plan for the above referenced address dated February 11, 2021. The site plan is related to the installation of a swimming pool in the wetland buffer. The requested amendments are shown on the accompanying site plan prepared by Daniel Sherman, Landscape Architect titled, Amendment to Site Plan and dated January 20, 2022. The requested amendments are: 1. Relocation of t— p--1 filter and �qi� pm�nt -- rpro.�dP— ShCI, the pip/ i/ter nt the north side of the house. The pool installation company advised that the location was both too for and at an elevation not ideal for the operation of the equipment. The pool company recommended a location at the mid-section of the south property line. To make the pool filter more hidden from the pool area and from the property to the south, it was placed instead below the rain garden retaining wall 11'-3"from the property line where a setback of 10'is required. 2. Adjustments were made to the mitigation plantings. This office has confirmed that the plant list approved with the site plan and the invoices for the plant material furnished and installed are consistent as to quantity. Several varieties of plantings were substituted due to availability. Plant material sizes were reduced due to the late season availability and material supply. Additional plant material was installed along the rear south property line T^=f?PR\o.A"",XT8@THd❑$❑a@"@❑$❑GaAI❑®. : II in November to enhance the screening between the pool area and the property to the south. 3. The rain garden and related retaining wall were reduced. The retaining wall at the rain garden was design at a height of 8' In the consideration of safety, the wall was constructed at height of 4' The change ingrading resulted in a raingarden at nearly half the designed storage volume. Following a review by the project engineer and the Village Engineer, the addition of nine Cultec storm water chambers were added to make up the storm water storage volume. The plans for the amended system were submitted August 12, 2021. 4. A fence was installed on the pool terrace retaining wail at the rain garden. The approved site plan shows the pool enclosure fence to be the existing chain link fence at the south, east and north perimeters of the rear yard. In consideration of sofety and Village fence code for wall height, the pool enclosure was installed around the top of the retaining wall on the plan, dated February 2S 2021 approved by the Architectural Review Board on March 17, 2021 and by the Building Department dated April 13, 2021. These changes were driven by field conditions, safety observations and technical practicality. The work with the rain garden was done in coordination with the Building and Engineering Departments. Every effort was made to adhere to the approved site plan in the placement of the pool and patios, grading and work within the clearing limit line and the installation of the mitigation plantings. We would welcome the Board members to visit the site and see how nicely the project has come out. Respectfully, t I� Dan Sherman ❑<i-10e0fZ?-tt;_>-EiO, &#Yf-i❑i'❑u lutt@iU❑❑❑b@a❑&>Yhoa)"ADOYa `Qfi'W660C ❑ UD ❑HUIAD',❑C5tOcm[=YPEYX£Z6Xoogcpc)o DANIEL SHERMAN LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, PC 4 Broadway, Suite 9 Phone: 914-824-0999 Valhalla, NY 10595 Fax: 914-824-0251 dan.danshermanlandscape@?Qmail.com www.donshermanlandscape.com May 11, 2022 Village of Rye Brook IE C IE DD Planning Board RMAY 1 1 2022 938 King Street Rye Brook, NY 10573 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK BUILDING DEPARTMENT RE: Marks Residence- 18 Hillandale Road Dear Chairman Goodman and Members of the Planning Board, On Tuesday, May loth, my office along with Cardillo Pools, conducted a sound study on the pool pump to better understand the level of noise that it produces. The noise level of the property without any pool equipment noise and just ambient outdoor sound, measured to be an average of 45 dB's at the location of the filter pump. When the pool equipment was started, the average noise level was 67 dB's directly adjacent to the pump. We then proceeded to move the sound meter to the South Property line. At the property line, which is approximately 11.4' from the pool equipment, the noise level was measuring to be an average of 47dB's. Lastly, we proceeded to the east of the property, approximately 50' away from the pool equipment, and the noise level was measuring to be an average of 46 dB's. In conducting this study, we have concluded that the pool equipment and the sound it produces will not have a negative impact on adjacent properties. If you have any questions or comments, please contact us. Respectfully, Dan Sherman Tara Orlando From: _Michal Nowak Sent: Thursday,April 14,2022 8:33 PM To: Tara Orlando;Robert;Sarah Brown;Drew Victoria Gamils Subject: Fwd: 18 Hillandale Attachments: 4.7.22 PB (full)Supplemental Submission(5192936.1).pdf For upload Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Daniel Marks<dan.marksl3@gmail.com> Date: April 14, 2022 at 7:38:04 PM EDT To: Mark Harmon <harmon.mark53@gmail.com>, ellentharmon@gmail.com Cc: Dan Sherman <dan.danshermanlandscape@gmail.com>, Mike Izzo <Mlzzo@ryebrook.org>, Michal Nowak<MNowak@ryebrook.org> Subject: 18 Hillandale Mark and Ellen: Thank you for your comments voiced at the last Planning Board meeting and your patience in the intervening weeks. My team of professionals and I have been working diligently with Village professionals and consultants to respond to your concerns and have adjusted our plans in a manner that we believe mitigates any unintentional impacts to your property. With respect to the pool filter equipment, we have spoken at length with our pool contractor to better understand the rationale for the relocation. We were informed that in order to operate properly, the filter must be located near or at the elevation of the pool. Unfortunately, due to the existing topography of the property and the elevation of the originally proposed area, the filter had to be relocated to the east of the pool, adjacent to the retaining wall. Taking into account the dimensions of the rain garden and topography of the property, this area was identified as the only feasible location for the equipment. We understand that you have audio and visual concerns about the new placement. We are now proposing sound buffering technology and enhanced landscape screening that we believe ameliorates and eradicates any adverse impacts to your property. For the dual purpose of aesthetics and audio dimming, a two-sided vinyl fence is proposed around the southern and western sides of the pool filter. An industrial strength, noise blocking blanket will also be affixed to the interior of this fence that will absorb any excess noise and disturbances. In order to address visibility concerns around the filter and the new enclosure, we are proposing an enhanced landscape plan to limit and indeed eliminate any view of the equipment. My landscape architect recently met with Sarah Brown from Hardesty and Hannover for a site visit, during which they reviewed the existing screen plantings and the filter. As a result, we are now proposing to install 8 8'-10' arborvitaes, two of which will fill in a gap of evergreen screening along the property line and 6 along the pool enclosure fence and retaining wall. These 6 plantings will work to further screen the pool and enclosure fence from your property. Regarding the enclosure fence, we remain committed to lowering the fence in compliance with the Village's regulations. With safety of our children a paramount concern, I hope you can understand my family's need to enclose the pool area. Finally, in response to comments regarding potential stormwater runoff and build-up of debris along the southern, rear corner of the property, my team of professionals and I reached out to Michal Nowak to be sure we understood and addressed any runoff issues caused by new grading. My landscape 1 contractor redirected a small swale that had been leading water along the southern property line directly to the stream that, in instances of heavier rainfall, could have led to water spilling off into the direction of your property. The swale has been redirected so that it will flow entirely into the rain garden. I am enclosing a courtesy copy of our recent submission to the Planning Board depicting these improvements and proposals. I look forward to hearing from you to discuss any outstanding concerns in advance of the meeting. Our family is out of town through the weekend, but we will be available Monday-Wednesday evening this week to discuss over the phone or to review on-site. Sincerely, Dan Marks 2 Tara Orlando From: Michal Nowak Sent: Tuesday,Xlay 10,2022 8:46 PM To: Tara Orlando;Robert Goodman;Sarah Brown;Drew Victoria Gamils Subject: FW:Addendum to screening plan for May meeting For the record From: Daniel Marks<dan.marksl3@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, May 10, 2022 8:36 PM To: Michal Nowak<MNowak@ryebrook.org> Cc: Dan Sherman <dan.danshermanlandscape@gmail.com> Subject: Addendum to screening plan for May meeting Michal - Sorry for the lateness of this message. Hope the below is not too late to be included in our proposal for Thursday. Dan S will be in touch in the morning to send a revised screening plan as well as a simple sketch of this new proposed privacy hedge. Dear Chairman Goodman and Members of the Planning Board, After discussion with the Harmons and the Village professionals on May 6th, we are proposing the following additional screening to be placed on interior of the pool area in order to fully screen the eastern section of the fence (which will be reduced to a height of 3 feet): Eighteen (18) 3'-4' Chesapeake Holly, spaced 3.5 feet apart Thank you very much for your consideration, Yael and Daniel Marks 1 D ECCEWE JUN - 2 2022 01 Yael and Daniel Marks 18 Hillandale Road VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK Rye Brook, NY 10573 BUILDING DEPARTMENT May 31, 2022 Village of Rye Brook Planning Board 938 King Street Rye Brook, NY 10573 RE: Amended site plan application for 18 Hillandale Road Dear Chairman Goodman and Members of the Planning Board, In response to feedback we received at the May meeting of the Planning Board pertaining to noise concerns related to placement of our pool filter pump, we are proposing the following revisions to our noise cancellation plan: 1. Replacement of single-speed pump motor with a variable speed motor. After consultation with our pool builder, Luigi Casale at Cardillo Pools, we have determined the best replacement pump -taking into consideration noise, pool filtration and long- run efficacy of the pool mechanical - is the Jandy VS ProFlo 1.85 HP pump. The manufacturer advertises a 40% sound reduction over other variable speed motors, as a result of proprietary sound dampening technology. Conservatively, this will reduce decibel readings as measured immediately at the pump from mid-60s to low-50s. Spec sheet for the new pump is attached. 2. Our previous proposal included QBO noise-cancelling blankets attached to the interior of the proposed physical screen. It proved difficult to obtain exact sound attenuation data for the blankets, given the low frequency and moderate decibel level of the pump. After additional consultation with our professionals, we are instead proposing to cover our pump with the Serene+ L080555 pump cover. This pump cover is designed to match the dimensions of the Jandy pump proposed above, and provides 75-90% sound reduction. Spec sheets for this cover are attached. These two upgrades to our proposal—even before accounting for the additional reduction provided by the previously proposed enclosure and additional planting- will reduce all noise emanating from the pump well below the level of ambient noise at practically any distance. These improvements should persist to the life of the pump (generally around ten years). Screening all visual and audio impact should support siting the pool mechanical at the southern end of the pool, where the equipment can maintain its best operative capacity over time. Thanks very much and we look forward to continued discussion with the Board, Yael and Dan Marks There's no need to sacrifice ADJUSTABLE BASE CONFIGVRA71ONS' your pump's power. a 're Cra.•cp:a;rr:r.nr-..Se energy consuming tngU•tpee0 pumps up to 1 S HP•the TISv/IJOv dual votttg. «.wrs•Ster rv«e• N•r,r•Lyerru,• iryy' VS F IOPro-7 fly,t fM only vanable-SpeeO pump on IM 't• of a,y,w1e,,w, market that offers the same performance at both voltages e.w�e sy..uu• .• a,.. lr•„Il,r•M.rr M�e►1'yy, e7r1' 1)Yfe' • I ISV/23@V OUM Vettage Win the ab lit to provide the same head t«r•a.. N.wr aw.a,rr11• Y p pressure and So., 4J ar�,••a FA..' •Ire• IJ till, if rates at bolo I I Sv and I30v,the VS f 1oPr o 105 ebmnaiet the need for R.Pe""o mam power ywnng su ar Mr ado• wrNwt compromising performance. ,u,pan. VJer ON,aIM I, rrJ aMMJ•E-a,n• • Add iWWP01 for leetant Aeteeletlee Two auad.ary relays can be used to control Who,pool equipment.Such as bootie,pumps and salt 0110r.nators.lot ratter,natall alien 6n0 •r - er . operation No reed for add,bonal timeclocks' , oil , • Low Electricity Coots rearrare— Saw over$050 Per yoaf.n energy COST V The varyble•tpeed motor allows for dramatic energy savings and Queter operaton k41 11.•e. M,. CrNn OrrrW W ■U` Itellge S O% aye UM are.L,i w..SM L.M1„ • pYI Qulltetl Yar�Jble�$peed PumQ ✓.ere 40'h Q,,ctc• 1-an Otte,.a'C'-.3,ab'.e ..,A I Is 11 110", 11 1 0- 1 1 1'•t' -Ill . . ,.a• .. .. I speed pumps,the VS FloPro 1 65 HP faatun low .plow IL 1t - - Proprietary sound dampening motor tocMology Allow,ng it to operate with noticeably Its&moist t • Ch""Tow Own CMtroUter "..•�. Designed to work with the lollowrng Jardy control tytternt tot complete proq,ammobddy and — - (JLtOm•Utpn(controller wed tepafat.lyl • ran*,AQuaL,nk•Automation System% • IOPUMP0l wdh,AQuaL-nk•App Cont,ol - • rEP•RController IerY AddOw"t Festivities • Adjustable base for soarntess direct replacement i of a variety of other pumps.n the anermarket • Zero Clearance TEFL Motor tot cool Quiet operation in tqM spaces - ti... I"unrons,ncludedw utd,re I•internal threads • Easy Controller Setup auto detoctt connection to an avtonnat,en system or a traditional controller• ebmnat,"the need to adjust settings manually RSatS Ou ck Connect Port for fatter installation and maintenance • Cry COMW Relay Control • tool-free did for easy debt removal • Engene,n,c easy-eran.90't handle Jandy.com 1.800.822.7933 ■ n tee. Scone + NOISE REDUCTION POOL PUMP EQUIPMENT COVER •'►ntnNr t+teorarons tna," IIL170762 Dimensions 35L x 14W x 161-I Year Warranty arranty • 75%-90%Sound Reduction • No Operating Costs • Easy Assembly,Lays Flat Storage • Lid removes for pump inspection and • Versatile or Custom Fit Available maintenance • Use with your favorite pool primp w Durable.lightweight.high temperature • One Year limited warranty resistant • Various colors available to blend into • Protect against:rust,dirt,rain,snow and surf your landscape • Extends the fife of your pump.protects against corrosion EMMEEM ✓ HAYWARD ✓ JANDY HCP-3000 Epump Pro Series VS FtoPro tW4GSalMmhont'.uar,�tr+ud 11ycK .yruiJlurry y'A with the prod;ct you may eturn it up to 30 days after ' t0096 dehwry fora full refired minus 10%ressocl,Mee and ,� t• the produUmustbr,neMeflenttonddioo s v' ' IT'M burr i♦r*-.00n-ibk for chipping c*qj �"� Tara Gerardi From: Harmon, Mark A. <MHarmon@hodgsonruss.com> Sent: Monday, February 7, 2022 9:32 AM To: Tara Gerardi Cc: Mike Izzo; Michal Nowak; dgamils@kblaw.com;Jennifer Gray; David M. Heiser; dan.marks13@gmail.com; dan.danshermanlandscapr@gmail.com Subject: Opposition to Marks Application for Amendment - 18 Hillandale Rd Attachments: Harmon Opposition to Applic for amend. -18 Hillandale Rd - Feb 7, 2022 .pdf, Ex A- Orig. Pool Rendering -18 Hillandale Rd 2021-1-28 (1).pdf; Ex B -Harmon Email to Marks, Sherman, Village - Jan 2022.pdf; Ex C- Sherman Letter-Marks-18 Hillandale Rd.-2022-1-20.pdf, Ex D -New Survey -Marks -18 Hillandale Road Ronald Persaud, LLS Survey 2021-12-8.pdf, Ex E- Photos from Harmon Property.zip Please see the attached from Mark and Ellen Harmon. The attachments include a letter to the Planning Board and Exhibits A—E. If there are any problems opening the zip file Exh. E containing photographs of the site, please advise and we will arrange to send under separate cover. Please circulate the attachments to the members of the Planning Board in advance of the Thursday, February 10, 2022 meeting. Mark A. Harmon 16 Hillandale Road Rye Brook, NY 10573 (914)589-9610 Harmon.mark53@gmail.com This message may contain confidential information that is protected by the attorney-client privilege or otherwise.If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any disclosure,copying,or use of the contents of this message is strictly prohibited.If this message has been received by you in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete the original message. Thank you. 1 Mark and Ellen Harmon 16 Hillandale Road Rye Brook, NY 10573 To: Robert I. Goodman, Chairman, and the Planning Board of the Village of Rye Brook Date: February 7,2022 Subject: Opposition to Application for Approval of an Amended Site Plan— Marks Residence— 18 Hillandale Road (lot 135-28-1-29) We are the homeowners at 16 Hillandale Road, the property immediately to the south of the subject property, and write to oppose the Markses' application to approve deviations from the plans previously submitted to and approved by this Board—deviations which have already been completed without notice, approval or consent. At the outset,we wish to make clear that these deviations—the installation of a four foot fence sitting atop a three foot high retaining wall, and placement of the pool equipment virtually as close to our property line as would be legal without a variance --are not the result of"field conditions"that could not have been known when approval for installation of the pool was first sought. Rather,they are changes which have been implemented for the benefit of the property owners at 18 Hillandale Road and to our detriment. When the original application was presented to the Planning Board,we carefully studied the plans submitted and attended the virtual meeting. Having lived here for 35 years,we raised no objections, cognizant that although we are the homeowners most directly affected by the project,we recognize the right of our neighbors to install a pool and its associated equipment so long as in compliance with the Village Code and the requirements imposed by the Planning Board. The original submission, as graphically depicted by renderings and detailed plans, appeared to be reasonable,to mitigate impact on our adjacent property(a primary consideration for approval), and to be in compliance with all of the above. The pool was at grade, except for the construction of a short retaining wall at its base, and was designed to screen from our view exactly that—a pool at grade level. In addition, the pool equipment was located at a significant distance from our property,where it would create no noise or visual impairment. We urge you to review the attached rendering presented to the Planning Board as part of the original application and on which we relied in deciding not to oppose the plans— see Ex A—Orig. Pool Rendering, attached. The reality of what has transpired is,unfortunately for us,quite different from what was expected and what was approved. Apparently embracing the principle that"it is better to ask for forgiveness than for permission,"the Markses and their seasoned team of professionals (some of whom have regularly appeared before this Board)took it upon themselves unilaterally to disregard several major components of the approved plan without notice, amendment or proper permission,to our material detriment but clearly to their aesthetic(and likely, economic)benefit. As Mr. Sherman notes in his submission today, detailed below under "Estimated Date of Completion"seeking approval of these amendments to the site plan,they have already been "Completed". And despite adding a 4 foot fence on top of the pool, effectively erecting a fence that reaches 7 feet high as opposed to a pool at grade level, and despite also placing the pool equipment virtually on our property line,no effort was made or has even been suggested to ameliorate the impact on us of these already effected changes. The remedy we propose to the flagrant violations of the approved plans are to reinstate the original plans,believing that one should not be permitted to flout the regulations of this Village to the detriment of one's neighbors, and then bank on the leniency of the Planning Board to allow those violations to stand, particularly when the remedies are simply economic and appear, at best,to be the result of what are self- imposed hardships. It goes without saying that it would be unfair for us to be made to endure the significant detriments to our property to spare the Markses having to correct the violations they and their team of professionals have brought on themselves. One further word on background. These issues came to light only after all of the work had been completed. Late in the summer,the Markses began to use their pool but it was clear that little of the landscape plan along our property line had been implemented. When we brought our issues to the attention of the Village, we learned that no certificate of occupancy had been issued and a final inspection had not been completed. It quickly became clear that the installation of the fence and placement of the pool equipment, as well as the required plantings,were not in compliance with the plans approved by this Board. These matters were conveyed to the Village by copy of email correspondence with Dan Marks and Dan Sherman, a copy of which is attached to this letter—see Ex B—Harmon Email to Marks, attached. Only then was this application to amend the original plans submitted. Dan Sherman submitted a letter in support of this application on January 19, 2022—see Ex C--the "Sherman Letter", attached--and Ronald Persaud submitted a revised survey of the amended plan dated December 8,2021 —see Ex D-the "New Survey", attached--which documents serve to explain what has actually transpired. The Sherman Letter offers a benign narrative of an approved plan that has changed, it claims, due to "field conditions, safety observations and technical practicality",while"every effort was made to adhere to the approved site plan",but the facts are in stark contradiction to that statement. To label the statements in the Sherman Letter"disingenuous", would be, at best, extremely generous on our part. Here are the facts: A. Relocation of Pool Filter and Equipment Original Approved Plan: The original plan that was approved and on which the permit was issued shows the pool equipment to be located on the far side(north side)of the Marks house, away from our property,where the visual and audio elements of the equipment would not be a disturbance to us. The Sherman Letter: The Sherman Letter alleges that the"pool installation company advised that the [original] location was both too far and at an elevation not ideal for the operation of the equipment.....[they] recommended a location at the mid-section of the south property line [that's us]....to make the pool filter more hidden from the pool area and from the property to the south, it was placed instead below the rain garden retaining wall 11'-Y from the property line [that's us] where a setback of 10' is required." The Facts: There were no changes in field conditions to those existing at the time of the original application that would have necessitated this move. It is hard to imagine, given the scope of this project and the intricacies of its design,that the"pool installation company"was not involved in the planning of the project and the location of the pool equipment. Further,the new location of the pool equipment could not be more noxious to our enjoyment of our property. The pool equipment has been moved from a location from as far away from our property line to one as close as it can be, one foot farther than the bare minimum required, directly in our sight line and audible to us in our back yard(hardly"more hidden" from our property, as alleged,but admittedly, more hidden from the Markses' pool area). There can be no credible explanation other than a budgetary one, and/or an enhancement to the Markses' aesthetic enjoyment—that is: "more hidden from(their)pool area". We submit photos for your review—see Ex E—Photos, attached. And see Ex D-New Survey, attached. Proposed Remedy: Relocate the pool equipment to its original approved site on the north side of the Marks house. B. Fence on Pool Terrace Retaining Wall Original Approved Plan: The original plan that was approved and on which the permit was issued shows no fence on top of the retaining wall immediately around the perimeter of the pool. We call your attention to the original renderings submitted on January 28, 2021, showing a flat pool with no fence ("Original Renderings", attached). The safety fence was to be the only fence around the perimeter of the entire property,which has been installed. The Sherman Letter: The Sherman Letter claims that the new fence, "(i)n consideration of safety and Village fence code for wall height"was approved by the Architectural Review Board on March 17, 2021 and by the Building Department dated April 13, 202 L" The Facts: Again, there were no changes in field conditions or safety considerations that were not known at the time of the original submission and none identified in the Sherman Letter. A fence around the perimeter of the pool on top of the retaining wall was never submitted to or approved by this Board, as it was not even part of the original submission. It should not,therefore, have been submitted for approval to the Architectural Review Board-a legal nicety certainly known to the Markses' professional staff-and was not compliant with regulations limiting the height of fences. Whatever the reasons for its erroneous approval by the ARB and inclusion in a permit,the installed fence was illegal both because it was not authorized by this Board and because it was not code compliant. The black wrought iron fence that has been installed(they showed a white fence to the ARB for approval—deviating from their own deviation) is actually 7 to 8 feet above ground level (since the height of the retaining wall on which it is located adds 3 —4 feet on top of the fence height). This eyesore is visible from every part of our back yard and is in violation of the Code and the Planning Board approval. Again,we submit photos for your review—see Ex E—Photos, attached. Proposed Remedy: Lowering the fence is not a remedy. The plan as submitted, including especially all landscaping,was designed to screen a pool at ground level; not a pool with a fence six feet or more above ground level. Remove the fence. C. Mitigation Plantings Original Approved Plan: The original plan that was approved and on which the permit was issued shows substantial, adequate plantings to screen the original design—a pool at ground level with 25 plantings ranging in height from 4 feet to 9 feet along our property line. The Sherman Letter: The Sherman Letter claims that the plantings are consistent with the original plan as to quantity,but that varieties of plantings were"substituted" and plant sizes reduced,both due to availability. It also alleges that"additional plant material was installed along the rear south property [that's us] in November to enhance the screening between the pool area and the property to the south". The Facts: Where to begin? The plantings are not consistent with the required quantity as approved and were never even designed to screen a pool with a fence rising six feet or more above ground level or to screen pool equipment. Most of the plantings on the plan are no more than 4 or 5 feet high and it has been admitted that there has not even been adherence to that requirement. In what only can be the most disingenuous of arguments, Mr. Sherman claims that, once the issues of non-compliance were brought to light, "additional" plantings were installed to enhance screening. In point of fact, however, they are not additional at all to what was included in the original landscape plan and are still not consistent with the approved number and size. They are significantly shorter than what was approved(offering no screening at heights as low as 2 feet rather than the required minimum 4 feet—and it appears that many of these plantings have not been given the attention they will need to even survive). The original plan did not approve the pool equipment next to our property line, and the few plantings they have made around it are inadequate to screen the pool equipment visually or audibly from our property; with the raised pool on the retaining wall and the new fence on top of it(not shown in their original renderings),plantings of much greater height and density would have been required to adequately screen the pool itself from our view. To assert that the plantings made were to"enhance"the screening for our benefit is false. The claim that the approved plantings were not available due to season, supply chain issues and the like is simply not credible; what does ring true is that these unauthorized changes were purely to assuage budgetary issues (Mr. Sherman has indeed mentioned that the project has gone over budget). See Ex E— Photos, attached. Proposed Remedy: Enforce the original plan and the original mitigation plantings. D. Rain Garden Suffice it to say that what needs to be noted here about the rain garden, in which standing water sits for days on end,creating whatever bacterial and other hazards there might be(for the Town Engineer to determine its compliance or not with regulations), is that it appears that, in its construction,the Markses' contractor has used our fence at the base of our property, advertently or otherwise, as a retaining wall for earth and debris. Not only does this create potential damage to our fence,but it is causing water to drain through the back of our property instead of into the stream. The relationship between that result and what was intended in the approved plan we leave for those with expertise in these matters to consider,but this has clearly created an unsustainable condition on our property. See Ex E—Photos, attached. The Sherman Letter concludes with an invitation to the Planning Board members to "visit the site and see how nicely the project has come out"—perhaps that is true from the Markses' back yard,but we extend the same invitation for you to visit our back yard and see the unapproved eyesore we are currently having to endure on a daily basis (notwithstanding the investment of thousands of dollars over the years that we have made to create now wholly insufficient ground level screening from their property). We look forward to discussion with the Board. Thank you for your consideration. Nark and Ellen Hannon Cc: Trustee David Heiser,Village Board Liaison Michael Izzo,Building and Fire Inspector Michal Nowak, Superintendent of Public Works/Village Engineer Drew Victoria Gamils,Esq.,Village Attorney Jennifer Gray,Esq.,Village Attorney Daniel Sherman, RLA Daniel and Yael Marks,Applicant Attachments h SIP NAN a,fyl- e AD, 4' Agri nil itts. . A ol �. pf,4 le ,i t ..f AOI I IN � .!_ ter,• ,� fixf �Iq�I w rr 1.1I., � s, f s •, I C' ?I �. Las•, 1 f., f � � t� � IIIIII ! Hill No" .. 1 , ■ son ..- mw or x •tila a age IF 1' �I- -1 i �lllll �, FM[ RIP � �■'■ice u ; .�� .•:_-- � ifs '� � ;� _ � 1 f E-mail from Harmons to Daniel Marks & Dan Sherman—Copy to Village—Jan 18, 2022 From: Mark Harmon <harmon.mark53@gmail.com> Date: Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 1:06 PM Subject: Re: Daniel Marks contact info To: Daniel Marks <dan.marks 13@gmail.com>, Ellen Harmon <ellentharmon@gmail.com>, Rays <raybarnes05@aol.com>, <dan.danshermanlandscape@gmail.com>, Mike Izzo <mizzo@ryebrook.org> Dan: Ellen and I have now had an opportunity to meet with our landscaper, Ray Barnes, and to compare your plantings with the landscaping plan approved by the Planning Board. A few comments before I address the immediate issues. First, Ellen and I did not oppose your application to install a swimming pool when you presented your plans to the Planning Board. As you noted in an earlier conversation, our home is the property most immediately impacted by your construction, and yet we tried not be an obstruction to your plans. We very carefully reviewed your landscape plan which called for 25 plantings, ranging in height from 4 feet to nine feet along our property line. At least on paper, we were satisfied that you had acted appropriately to screen our property from any intrusion from your construction. Second, Ray never told Dan Sherman that he thought your plantings were sufficient or in compliance with the approved plans. He listened to what Dan had to say and acknowledged those statements - as having been made - not as accurate. I have copied both Ray and Dan Sherman so there will be no misunderstanding going forward. The two features of your pool installation that cause us the most visual concern are the fence installed above the retaining wall around the perimeter of the pool, and the location of the pool filter and equipment. As I am sure you know, neither the fence nor the pool equipment, as installed, are consistent with the plans submitted to and approved by the Planning Board. The pool equipment was supposed to be installed on the far side of your home away from our property. And there was no notice of a fence sitting atop the retaining wall surrounding the pool either in the application or the renderings submitted to the Planning Board which, to the contrary, clearly disclose no such fence. That was the state of affairs when the public hearing was held at the Planning Board to which we made no objection. When we first spoke, after you had gone forward to plant some non-conforming plantings, you said your landscaper had been unable to find plantings that would conform. But the fact is that you have not complied with the requirements of the approved plans. Most of what you have since referred to as "additional plantings" are simply plantings that were required in the first instance. And, even now, you have not complied with the landscape plan, either in the number, size or type of plantings. We also have concerns that many of the plantings will not survive the winter. But even were all that remedied, there remains the issue that the landscape plan was submitted and approved without consideration that a fence would be installed above the pool perimeter and that the pool equipment would be located behind the pool adjacent to our property line. Had we known that this was your ultimate intent, we would not have remained quiet. In addition, it appears that, in the construction of the rain garden, your contractor has used our fence at the base of our property, intentionally or otherwise, as a retaining wall for earth and debris. Not only does this create potential damage to our fence, it is causing water to drain through the back of our property instead of into the stream. In sum, Dan, we are not satisfied that you have met your obligations and believe that ameliorating these issues can only be accomplished by relocating the pool equipment, remedying the rain garden issue, and solving the screening issues that result in part from the installation of a fence above the retaining wall surrounding the pool and the failure to comply with the plans as approved. Mark A. Harmon DANIEL SHERMAN LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, P.C. 4 Broadway, Suite 9 Valhalla, NY 10595 914-824-0999 Fax: 914-824-0251 Dan.danshermanlandscape@gmail.com www.donshermaniandscape.com January 19, 2022 Robert Goodman - Chair Planning Department JAN 2 0 2012 Village of Rye Brook VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK 938 King Street BUILDING DEPARTMENT Rye Brook, A I Y 10513 Re: Application for amendment to an approved Site Plan 18 Hillandale Road: lot 135-28-1-29 Chair and Board, This letter accompanies our application for amendments to the site plan for the above referenced address dated February 11, 2021. The site plan is related to the installation of a swimming pool in the wetland buffer. The requested amendments are shown on the accompanying site plan prepared by Daniel Sherman, Landscape Architect titled, Amendment to Site Plan and dated January 20, 2022. The requested amendments are: 1. Relocation of the pool filter and equipment. The approved plan shows the pool filter at the north side of the house. The pool installation company advised that the location was both too for and at an elevation not ideal for the operation of the equipment. The pool company recommended a location at the mid-section of the south property line. To make the pool filter more hidden from the pool area and from the property to the south, it was placed instead below the rain garden retaining wall 11'-.3"from the property line where a setback of 10'is required. 2. Adjustments were made to the mitigation plantings. This office has confirmed that the plan t list appro ved wi th the site plan and the in voices for the plan t ma serial furnished and installed are consistent as to quantity. Several varieties of plantings were substituted due to availability. Plant material sizes were reduced due to the late season availability and material supply. Additional plant material was installed along the rear south property line in November to enhance the screening between the pool area and the property to the south. 3. The rain garden and related retaining wall were reduced. The retaining wall at the rain garden was design at a height of 8' In the consideration of safety, the wall was constructed at height of 4' The change in grading resulted in a rain garden at nearly half the designed storage volume. Following a review by the project engineer and the Village Engineer, the addition of nine Cultec storm water chambers were added to make up the storm water storage volume. The plans for the amended system were submitted August 12, 2021. 4. A fence was installed on the pool terrace retaining wail at the rain garden. -1he approved site plan shows the pool enclosure fence to be the existing chain link fence at the south, east and north perimeters of the rear yard. In consideration of safety and Village fence code for wall height, the pool enclosure was installed around the top of the retaining wall or, the plan dated February 25, 2021 approved by the Architectural Review Board on March 17, 2021 and by the Building Department doted April 1.3, 2021, These changes were driven by field conditions, safety observations and technical practicality. The work with the rain garden was done in coordination with the Building and Engineering Departments. Every effort was made to adhere to the approved site plan in the placement of the pool and patios, grading and work within the clearing limit line and the installation of the mitigation plantings. We would welcome the Board members to visit the site and see how nicely the project has come out. Respectfully, �Q l" -- Dan Sherman 0 cc J vow ° "-a0o' E 6 N� yo�v . WD z q'. , C. 0 >e N ago�..a5 gJ to o L ,n O u I pK# a°,�� r LO '-�f F ° CC J° U° -OO � s V �n'cl �Y,�b �a5e o J o o s s r occodOm 4i i o fij a< p� EE�\ \\ 1 fJ • a � O r E \ \ ` rb NEpN i rnu JNu >c o 5 3 r TO i qq N Q1 `�l ,,``Q KOS, +•i Y V,g! u bD O b � E c 0 V V' E• N V •Y O 'V �n S� 3 ,,sL' _� � N Or OQ m T GOS zo to• �'Z O Y V .r O U u O �O S O O k U 2 o�oa)aNiuv �J m$ 03� u 5 a iz v DO: �� •a0�s `°° u • y�(o� °moo n `�O •� y i=o J O E m o y c u`o � ° � 6s� •••••• J u / did• Z •y3 o�m°`m�m o0cc m J _j o c E TN �ti• �� nC o��o?Z ` ��� S • T O :O .9•. u atl1i o o a c N�o�y Z • o L °.. N W 1 N U O m Q 8 Vl ti lob d-Olk.` !agook• err► r4M• ..`.+ , • 41how..i...:ar�� / • ,.....�� . • �i • +��� .^.° ��� .Mir I. _ 1 4K�10w;-, AIF _ �� 4 �. •* Slow ORMOND OWNS ft • sue► •'�w.e.::r...,. !r . �,. .� ' ..,,... dow '-IP..._- 4111010... 4Mb .0--..+ s � t % • � yc ° . A ti ,,1 >icAMr. � � • `MIS.�. [Ni,.-a �.If��r � � � f �,. . AMW AND A Ab -Alt -� a-. � +�;;: ', ,.,■,,,.. .�. ...- is �'• ;�- . � . r r • • �.. SIM • i � y Yid-� ',;.- �• � ^�+ •� .", _�{r.. ' side- •� . ' 1:. - T �Y \ !IA�J+y 4M/1 , ^, } i .. .• Zvi Yr �a. JAW -IN�s • t1\ y y ••ter ,- -.. ..�� , �•ra+ '* j ,. .tom --� I" 1 s. mat♦ _ • /. r Ilk 31 1 r � - w n- t { , fa T - a WV i L�Rf lk 'r mom=�i Ci~� .&sA=- r R F , - • '� �l �-tiy `,w` ,, -yam ,•�� f 40 05 W- j1J ` • �.. br!fAf1• w. t 114 ���r•rw m.♦t• �e�n+r r•yw�r - M S _ t -Rti 1 - r ir !!`. •tov 00 Jr ���j•� fir• ��:.,' .�r � Y.�t •. � �. ' ' s r •+ 4 . �a• a" .t'�j:�i' i /J •y • � ,4dof•"Y� ry °` �` `�i•d.�^ �Y � +'r'r"��j i�� � _ t'►��, '�'� a Iona .�,; ,� (� � � � •�� ;- �,y��, � , ov jdef ' 1 *` dL SLAAL y AOF � •a � M • .y7 I ♦+F i. •'- `j so- KST 1` , .F Mal ,,3' �' � ' •�``~fit:"���� ,�, � �` '• -- �`' ILI : fir' .► � 1 1• � ,, - � � � t� ��� q'. 10 0., f , ,p Mr60 1 ��•:� � bl oJim f, lop ww VC or t7 IA� ol • �t ',` :�:, ., � ,7, - - ``•��. Yam: �l r /} ` •i`• ! 1 " kv 14b►i -- ' 40 al . .No � a , J RI, . jf i ,, �, t r K 'a Y► A N, ' •. �'�'' � .mod Ilk—- lop a �kip I J, 1I - + Ir jC 10 •. 1 �• p ECENE Mark and Ellen Harmon APR 18 2022 16 Hillandale Road Rye Brook, NY 10573 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK BUILDING DEPARTMENT To: Robert I.Goodman, Chairman, and the Planning Board of the Village of Rye Brook Date: April 14, 2022 Subject: Addendum to Opposition to Application for Approval of an Amended Site Plan— Marks Residence— 18 Hillandale Road (lot 135-28-1-29) On February 7, 2022,we submitted a letter(the"Harmon Letter", attached here for your convenience as Ex. 1)in opposition to the Application for Approval of an Amended Site Plan filed by the Markses with respect to their property at 18 Hillandale Road(the"Marks Amended Site Plan"). We write now to update and supplement our prior submission and remarks made at the March 10, 2022 meeting of the Planning Board. As we have stated previously,we believe that had the Amended Site Plan been the original application, and not a request for legalization after the fact, it would not have been approved: a black metal fence that sits 7 feet above the ground would not have been approved; a properly functioning rain garden(screened from our view)would have been required; the pool equipment would not have been permitted to have been placed next to our property line in full view and sound given the substantial property on which it could have been located elsewhere; and plantings adequate at the present time (and not perhaps years from now)to screen the pool, any approved fence, all pool equipment, and the rain garden,would have been required by this Board. While it is our understanding that it is not the role of the Planning Board to punish the Markses for having undertaken work that was not authorized,neither should they be rewarded at our expense nor indulged because it may be inconvenient or costly now to do what should have been done in the first instance. A. Relocation of Pool Filter and Equipment Original Approved Plan: The original plan that was approved and on which the permit was issued located the pool equipment on the far(north) side of the Marks's house, away from our property,where the visual and audio elements of the equipment would not have been a disturbance to us. Most Recent Arguments by Marks/Sherman at the March 10 PB meeting: The question was posed by the Planning Board as to whether there was any other place that the pool equipment could have been located, rather than 11 feet from our property line. The original plan had the equipment next to their house(Mr. Sherman offered an implausible defense that their pool contractor did not have a copy of the survey when he bid the job), and Mr. Sherman stated at the March meeting that, in fact,Mr. Luigi Casale from Cardillo Pools(their pool contractor)had more recently wanted to put the equipment in a different location than where it is now— thus admitting that there were in fact alternatives considered as opposed to its current placement. Mr. Marks and Mr. Sherman stated that it was located where it now stands to reduce trenching(a cost factor),avoid the ongoing rain garden excavation(a timing factor), and be near the electrical and propane hookups(cost again), which, of course,begs the question since they admittedly could have all been placed at other locations,perhaps more impactful on the Markses than on us. Our Position: We have submitted a letter Ex. 2, attached) from Pennella Contracting in which Mr. Pennella, an experienced contractor/landscaper/excavator whose work includes trenching for pool equipment, confirmed, after inspecting the site and reviewing the plans, that there is no reason that the pool equipment 1 could not have been placed at the north end of the pool, away from our property at the time of construction. His opinion has been confirmed to us by a second pool contractor who also inspected the site and plans. Additionally, it should be noted that the Village Code provides as follows: Code -Villane of Rye Brook -- 224-7 Size and location. C. Filters,heaters and pumps shall be located underground or buffered to minimize noise and located no less than 10 feet from the property line. Section 224-7(c) of the Code has clearly not been complied with. Since Mr. Sherman has acknowledged that other locations were under consideration, and our expert, Mr. Pennella,has stated that other locations were available at installation, our request is that the pool equipment either be moved to the original planned location near the house, or, at the least,be moved to the north end of their pool, away from our property line(and properly screened from view and sound,which Ms. Sarah Brown confirmed at the March meeting had not been done). What weight should be given now to the anticipated argument at the April Planning Board meeting that, in hindsight,the pool equipment could not have been placed anywhere else we leave to the good judgment of this Board. The installation of a large gray box to conceal the pool equipment was offered by Mr. Marks and Mr. Sherman at the meeting; we do not find this to be an attractive or satisfactory solution, as it will simply substitute one eyesore for another with questionable impact on noise. B. Fence on Pool Terrace RetaininE Wall Original Approved Plan: The original plan that was approved and on which the permit was issued shows no fence on top of the retaining wall immediately around the pool,thus permitting their children direct access to the pool. Their original code compliant safety fence was to be only a fence around the perimeter of the entire property. The second iteration of their fence was made in a non-procedural jump(of which we received no notice)to the Architectural Review Board on March 17, 2021, and shows a white fence that attaches to the Marks's home and goes only part way around the pool, also permitting access by children directly to the pool. Most Recent Arguments by Marks/Sherman at the March 10 PB meeting: Mr.Marks now contends that notwithstanding the absence of any fence in the original application, or the failure of the fence proposed to the ARB to deny access to the pool from their home, he always anticipated a fence surrounding the pool. Of course,even then the fence installed is an unsightly black metal fence that sits 7 feet above ground level and violates not only his own plans but also the Village Code(a 4 foot fence on a 3 foot retaining wall would require a variance from the ZBA). It should not go unremarked that the fence as installed does not even comply with the fence for which approval was sought in the ARB application. Our Position: We have serious reservations,given the record regarding the installation versus the several applications that have been made,that safety is the compelling issue and rationale for the installation of the completely non-conforming fence. We note in this regard that the Markses have an automatic pool cover, which while using the pool last summer,they closed every night. We also note that many homeowners, including us,have relied exclusively on a fence encircling the perimeter of their property. 2 If,however,the Planning Board accepts the arguments being made and approves a fence around the pool at all,then given the unusual height with the retaining wall, highly visible and intrusive from our back yard and from all of our back windows,we would request that a 3 (not 4)foot high fence that is clear(i.e.,plexiglass, glass, etc. —see Ex.3, attached, for examples)be installed. And,of course,that sufficient plantings be required to now screen the entire fence and pool. While we recognize that the Planning Board may not customarily involve itself in the aesthetics of fencing, given the unusual nature of this fence and its intrusive visibility from our property, as well as the past conduct of the Markses,this situation calls out for involvement by the Board and should not be left to the discretion of another Board to resolve. C. Mitigation Plantings/Screening Original Approved Plan: The original plan that was approved and on which the permit was issued, shows plantings to screen the original design—a pool at ground level, with no fence and no visible pool equipment, with 25 plantings ranging in height from 4 feet to 9 feet along our property line. Most Recent Arguments by Marks/Sherman at the March 10 PB meeting: Mr. Marks and Mr. Sherman continue to insist that more plantings than were required by the original plans have been installed, including 9 additional trees, although Mr. Sherman does acknowledge that his plant broker was"unable"to obtain the species or size plants that he ordered. He went so far as to argue that there are so many plantings along our property line,that he "couldn't fit anything more in responsibly; it's really quite packed—you can hardly walk through there." Our Position: Even if Mr. Sherman's contentions were true—and they are not-those who have seen the site are aware that the construction is not adequately screened. Perhaps additional plantings were purchased and listed,but they were not planted along our property line—maybe somewhere else on the Marks' property. The original plan was not designed to screen what in fact was installed, which requires substantially more and taller plantings, and the plantings do not even comply with the original plan. It is frankly appalling that the Markses undertook to ignore the approved plans in a way that significantly increased the impact on us while, at the same time,reducing the screening that was required. Under the circumstances,reassurance from Mr. Sherman that, eventually,these plants will grow in size and density to provide the appropriate screening is not satisfactory and not a representation on which we should be expected to rely. Moreover,Ms. Brown acknowledged at the March meeting that the mitigation plantings that are now being used for screening"are not doing any kind of screening for noise or visual effect", and that other species would be more appropriate; her report to the Board did not confirm that 9 trees in addition to those required by the approved original plan,that Mr. Sherman alleges were planted,had in fact been planted. Nor should the adequacy of the screening between our property and the Marks's be measured by the volume or density of plantings on our property; we are under no obligation to maintain our plantings to provide screening from their construction, and their construction is highly visible from our back windows As the Village Code provides: Code - Village of Rye Brook - § 224-10 Screening. Where planting as a screen does not exist, dense shrubs no less than four feet high shall be planted or a solid fence installed between the pool rim and the lot lines. Of course, where the fence in question is effectively 6 feet high, plantings taller than 4 feet high are required to adequately screen. 3 We have submitted a letter from an experienced local landscaper who has inspected the site and reviewed the plans, Mr. Ray Barnes of Ray's Landscape Services LLC (Ex. 4, attached). Mr. Barnes refutes Mr. Sherman's claims that additional plantings were installed, that there is "hardly room for any more to be made", or that larger plantings were not available for purchase (Mr. Bames has been able to fill his orders throughout the pandemic). In addition, Mr. Barnes maintains that there are large and obvious gaps in the plantings that should be filled in, that the plantings that were made are insufficient in both size and quantity for what was constructed (fence, pool equipment and rain garden), and that we should not count on the unknown growth of the existing plants over time. We provide photos of the gaps in the Markses' screening (Ex. 5, attached),together with an example of adequate screening plantings. Whatever components of the construction are approved by the Planning Board, plantings that are sufficient in size, scope, type and density adequately to screen all elements of the project now, and not in several years (maybe), should be required. The possibility that a Certificate of Occupancy could be issued before we know the sufficiency of these plantings (and the ones in the "rain garden"), as promised by Mr. Sherman, is quite troubling. D. Rain Garden The "rain garden", as observed by members of the Planning Board on a site visit, is a swamp with gravel, a concrete pad, and a tiny collection of sparse and widely spaced plants that do not appear to be growing; water does not drain but pools in it for consecutive days at a time (see Ex. 6, attached, for photos of the standing water after 72 hours with no rain). We have attached a number of expert papers (see Ex. 7 , including from Cornell University and the NYS Department of Environmental Conservation, which state that "rain gardens are designed to hold standing water for less than 24 hours so that mosquitos can't breed". Clearly, the Markses' "rain garden" does not comply with industry standards, whether as a result of faulty design, improper location, poor installation, or a combination thereof. It poses a serious health concern for us, not to mention an unsightly swamp. A local expert in drainage and engineering who inspected the site and reviewed the plans, Mr. Bob Zmarzlak, of Soundview Engineers, opined that the"rain garden"may have been installed too low in relation to seasonal high groundwater levels, and that the berm near our property is too steep and close to the property line, which may account for the water runoff onto our property(see Ex. 8, attached, for Mr. Zmaralak's letter). Mr. Barnes concluded that "relying on the few small plantings in the rain garden to take root by this summer to absorb the standing water is uncertain—they were planted in 2021 [actually, Fall 2020, according to Mr. Sherman] and have not yet done so; it remains to be seen whether they will take root and whether they will absorb all of the accumulating water within a 24 hour period or longer. There is currently standing water in the rain garden for days at a time." But Mr. Sherman assured the Planning Board in March that "it will fill right in", and that will happen"later this Spring"—we have seen no signs of this. And as previously mentioned, the pileup of mud and debris from this "rain garden" that runs down the hill and accumulates at the bottom, is pushing against our fence and threatening its integrity. Mr. Sherman assured the group at the March meeting that the debris will be cleaned up and "shouldn't reoccur"; that is not a promise in which we take any comfort. They have recently put down some black plastic attached to wood sticks as a temporary measure, but that is not a permanent fix. Similarly,the continual runoff of water from the Markses' property onto our lower property has created a new stream that is gradually flooding our lower level, resulting in an increasingly serious problem that must be resolved. Both Mr. Zmarzlak and Mr. Bames acknowledged the issue,with Mr. Barnes advising that"there is a significant increase in mud and water flowing 4 from the neighbor's property onto the Harmon's back yard since the construction, as well as accumulating against the Harmon's fence at the bottom of the property." It is clear that this "rain garden" is not only defectively designed/built, but that its existence is causing material damage to our property. Lastly, as members of the Planning Board observed,the"rain garden"is a pit of gravel and blue material that constitutes a "scary" visual problem for the Marks's neighbors, one that they would not want in their own backyards nor in the adjacent yard. We concur that it is an extremely unattractive installation for us to have to see from our backyard as well as from our windows, and the aesthetics (or lack thereof) needs to be addressed as well as the defective functioning. A Side Note As an aside,we note that just as before and throughout this entire process, the Markses have made no attempt to contact us to inform us of their plans to change the original design,nor of any plans they may have in response to comments and suggestions of the Planning Board made at the March meeting,notwithstanding the advice of Chairman Goodman that they take the initiative and do so. It is a disturbing and unwelcome reality that, after having lived in our house for 35 years, enjoying our backyard and our neighborhood,we have suddenly been compelled to spend countless hours and endure aggravation dealing with a significant problem that has been thrust upon us by the Markses. For all of the foregoing reasons,we ask the Planning Board to adopt the positions we have articulated above. If it is costly to fix the problems that the Markses have caused solely by their own conduct,that is not an issue with which we should have to compromise. We look forward to further discussion with the Board. Thank you again for your consideration. ►-lark and Ellen Hanwn Cc: Trustee David Heiser,Village Board Liaison Michael Izzo, Building and Fire Inspector Michal Nowak, Superintendent of Public Works/Village Engineer Drew Victoria Gamils,Esq.,Village Attorney Jennifer Gray,Esq.,Village Attorney Daniel Sherman,RLA Daniel and Yael Marks,Applicant Attachments 5 EXHIBIT 1 Mark and Ellen Harmon 16 Hillandale Road Rye Brook, NY 10573 To: Robert I. Goodman,Chairman,and the Planning Board of the Village of Rye Brook Date: February 7,2022 Subject: Opposition to Application for Approval of an Amended Site Plan— Marks Residence—18 Hillandale Road (lot 135-28-1-29) We are the homeowners at 16 Hillandale Road,the property immediately to the south of the subject property,and write to oppose the Markses' application to approve deviations from the plans previously submitted to and approved by this Board—deviations which have already been completed without notice, approval or consent. At the outset,we wish to make clear that these deviations—the installation of a four foot fence sitting atop a three foot high retaining wall, and placement of the pool equipment virtually as close to our property line as would be legal without a variance --are not the result of"field conditions"that could not have been known when approval for installation of the pool was first sought. Rather,they are changes which have been implemented for the benefit of the property owners at 18 Hillandale Road and to our detriment. When the original application was presented to the Planning Board, we carefully studied the plans submitted and attended the virtual meeting. Having lived here for 35 years,we raised no objections, cognizant that although we are the homeowners most directly affected by the project,we recognize the right of our neighbors to install a pool and its associated equipment so long as in compliance with the Village Code and the requirements imposed by the Planning Board. The original submission,as graphically depicted by renderings and detailed plans,appeared to be reasonable,to mitigate impact on our adjacent property(a primary consideration for approval),and to be in compliance with all of the above. The pool was at grade,except for the construction of a short retaining wall at its base, and was designed to screen from our view exactly that—a pool at grade level. In addition,the pool equipment was located at a significant distance from our property,where it would create no noise or visual impairment. We urge you to review the attached rendering presented to the Planning Board as part of the original application and on which we relied in deciding not to oppose the plans— see Ex A—Orig. Pool Rendering,attached. The reality of what has transpired is,unfortunately for us,quite different from what was expected and what was approved. Apparently embracing the principle that"it is better to ask for forgiveness than for permission,"the Markses and their seasoned team of professionals(some of whom have regularly appeared before this Board)took it upon themselves unilaterally to disregard several major components of the approved plan without notice,amendment or proper permission,to our material detriment but clearly to their aesthetic(and likely, economic)benefit. As Mr. Sherman notes in his submission today, detailed below under "Estimated Date of Completion" seeking approval of these amendments to the site plan,they have already been "Completed". And despite adding a 4 foot fence on top of the pool, effectively erecting a fence that reaches 7 feet high as opposed to a pool at grade level,and despite also placing the pool equipment virtually on our property line,no effort was made or has even been suggested to ameliorate the impact on us of these already effected changes. The remedy we propose to the flagrant violations of the approved plans are to reinstate the original plans,believing that one should not be permitted to flout the regulations of this Village to the detriment of one's neighbors, and then bank on the leniency of the Planning Board to allow those violations to stand, particularly when the remedies are simply economic and appear, at best,to be the result of what are self- imposed hardships. It goes without saying that it would be unfair for us to be made to endure the significant detriments to our property to spare the Markses having to correct the violations they and their team of professionals have brought on themselves. One further word on background. These issues came to light only after all of the work had been completed. Late in the summer,the Markses began to use their pool but it was clear that little of the landscape plan along our property line had been implemented. When we brought our issues to the attention of the Village, we learned that no certificate of occupancy had been issued and a final inspection had not been completed. It quickly became clear that the installation of the fence and placement of the pool equipment, as well as the required plantings,were not in compliance with the plans approved by this Board. These matters were conveyed to the Village by copy of email correspondence with Dan Marks and Dan Sherman, a copy of which is attached to this letter—see Ex B—Harmon Email to Marks, attached. Only then was this application to amend the original plans submitted. Dan Sherman submitted a letter in support of this application on January 19, 2022—see Ex C--the "Sherman Letter",attached--and Ronald Persaud submitted a revised survey of the amended plan dated December 8,2021 —see Ex D-the"New Survey",attached--which documents serve to explain what has actually transpired. The Sherman Letter offers a benign narrative of an approved plan that has changed, it claims,due to "field conditions, safety observations and technical practicality",while"every effort was made to adhere to the approved site plan", but the facts are in stark contradiction to that statement. To label the statements in the Sherman Letter"disingenuous", would be, at best, extremely generous on our part. Here are the facts: A. Relocation of Pool Filter and Equipment Original Approved Plan: The original plan that was approved and on which the permit was issued shows the pool equipment to be located on the far side(north side)of the Marks house,away from our property,where the visual and audio elements of the equipment would not be a disturbance to us. The Sherman Letter: The Sherman Letter alleges that the"pool installation company advised that the [original] location was both too far and at an elevation not ideal for the operation of the equipment.....[they] recommended a location at the mid-section of the south property line [that's us]....to make the pool filter more hidden from the pool area and from the property to the south, it was placed instead below the rain garden retaining wall 11'-Y from the property line [that's us] where a setback of 10' is required." The Facts: There were no changes in field conditions to those existing at the time of the original application that would have necessitated this move. It is hard to imagine,given the scope of this project and the intricacies of its design,that the "pool installation company"was not involved in the planning of the project and the location of the pool equipment. Further,the new location of the pool equipment could not be more noxious to our enjoyment of our property. The pool equipment has been moved from a location from as far away from our property line to one as close as it can be, one foot farther than the bare minimum required, directly in our sight line and audible to us in our back yard(hardly"more hidden"from our property, as alleged, but admittedly, more hidden from the Markses' pool area). There can be no credible explanation other than a budgetary one, and/or an enhancement to the Markses' aesthetic enjoyment—that is: "more hidden from (their)pool area". We submit photos for your review—see Ex E—Photos, attached. And see Ex D-New Survey,attached. Proposed Remedy: Relocate the pool equipment to its original approved site on the north side of the Marks house. B. Fence on Pool Terrace Retaining Wall Original Approved Plan: The original plan that was approved and on which the permit was issued shows no fence on top of the retaining wall immediately around the perimeter of the pool. We call your attention to the original renderings submitted on January 28,2021, showing a flat pool with no fence("Original Renderings", attached). The safety fence was to be the only fence around the perimeter of the entire property,which has been installed. The Sherman Letter: The Sherman Letter claims that the new fence,"(i)n consideration of safety and Village fence code for wall height"was approved by the Architectural Review Board on March 17, 2021 and by the Building Department dated April 13,202U' The Facts: Again,there were no changes in field conditions or safety considerations that were not known at the time of the original submission and none identified in the Sherman Letter. A fence around the perimeter of the pool on top of the retaining wall was never submitted to or approved by this Board,as it was not even part of the original submission. It should not,therefore,have been submitted for approval to the Architectural Review Board-a legal nicety certainly known to the Markses' professional staff-and was not compliant with regulations limiting the height of fences. Whatever the reasons for its erroneous approval by the ARB and inclusion in a permit,the installed fence was illegal both because it was not authorized by this Board and because it was not code compliant. The black wrought iron fence that has been installed(they showed a white fence to the ARB for approval—deviating from their own deviation) is actually 7 to 8 feet above ground level (since the height of the retaining wall on which it is located adds 3—4 feet on top of the fence height). This eyesore is visible from every part of our back yard and is in violation of the Code and the Planning Board approval. Again, we submit photos for your review—see Ex E—Photos,attached. Proposed Remedy: Lowering the fence is not a remedy. The plan as submitted, including especially all landscaping,was designed to screen a pool at ground level; not a pool with a fence six feet or more above ground level. Remove the fence. C. Mitization Plantings Original Approved Plan: The original plan that was approved and on which the permit was issued shows substantial,adequate plantings to screen the original design—a pool at ground level with 25 plantings ranging in height from 4 feet to 9 feet along our property line. The Sherman Letter: The Sherman Letter claims that the plantings are consistent with the original plan as to quantity,but that varieties of plantings were"substituted"and plant sizes reduced, both due to availability. It also alleges that"additional plant material was installed along the rear south property [that's us] in November to enhance the screening between the pool area and the property to the south". The Facts: Where to begin? The plantings are not consistent with the required quantity as approved and were never even designed to screen a pool with a fence rising six feet or more above ground level or to screen pool equipment. Most of the plantings on the plan are no more than 4 or 5 feet high and it has been admitted that there has not even been adherence to that requirement. In what only can be the most disingenuous of arguments, Mr. Sherman claims that,once the issues of non-compliance were brought to light,"additional" plantings were installed to enhance screening. In point of fact,however,they are not additional at all to what was included in the original landscape plan and are still not consistent with the approved number and size. They are significantly shorter than what was approved(offering no screening at heights as low as 2 feet rather than the required minimum 4 feet—and it appears that many of these plantings have not been given the attention they will need to even survive). The original plan did not approve the pool equipment next to our property line,and the few plantings they have made around it are inadequate to screen the pool equipment visually or audibly from our property; with the raised pool on the retaining wall and the new fence on top of it(not shown in their original renderings), plantings of much greater height and density would have been required to adequately screen the pool itself from our view. To assert that the plantings made were to"enhance"the screening for our benefit is false. The claim that the approved plantings were not available due to season, supply chain issues and the like is simply not credible;what does ring true is that these unauthorized changes were purely to assuage budgetary issues(Mr. Sherman has indeed mentioned that the project has gone over budget). See Ex E— Photos, attached. Proposed Remedy: Enforce the original plan and the original mitigation plantings. D. Rain Garden Suffice it to say that what needs to be noted here about the rain garden, in which standing water sits for days on end, creating whatever bacterial and other hazards there might be(for the Town Engineer to determine its compliance or not with regulations), is that it appears that, in its construction,the Markses' contractor has used our fence at the base of our property,advertently or otherwise, as a retaining wall for earth and debris. Not only does this create potential damage to our fence, but it is causing water to drain through the back of our property instead of into the stream. The relationship between that result and what was intended in the approved plan we leave for those with expertise in these matters to consider,but this has clearly created an unsustainable condition on our property. See Ex E—Photos,attached. The Sherman Letter concludes with an invitation to the Planning Board members to"visit the site and see how nicely the project has come out"—perhaps that is true from the Markses' back yard, but we extend the same invitation for you to visit our back yard and see the unapproved eyesore we are currently having to endure on a daily basis (notwithstanding the investment of thousands of dollars over the years that we have made to create now wholly insufficient ground level screening from their property). We look forward to discussion with the Board. Thank you for your consideration. Nark and Ellen Hawn Cc: Trustee David Heiser, Village Board Liaison Michael Izzo, Building and Fire Inspector Michal Nowak, Superintendent of Public Works/Village Engineer Drew Victoria Gamils, Esq., Village Attorney Jennifer Gray, Esq.,Village Attorney Daniel Sherman,RLA Daniel and Yael Marks,Applicant Attachments �e e. ,j II=r, �, ► Ila-- �� n ZZ I� IIt. ��P� v1 �� ; •; r'L• t �" •11 l • 'i-. " , rib �' • � /•� ti v �r I' r w r Mi— owlSO call �� on e ,4 j�h ry r�'• �r�� r S i I • � 1 �' Ili •, 1r r E-mail from Harmons to Daniel Marks & Dan Sherman—Copy to Village—Jan 18, 2022 From: Mark Harmon <harmon.mark53@gmail.com> Date: Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 1:06 PM Subject: Re: Daniel Marks contact info To: Daniel Marks <dan.marks13@gmail.com>, Ellen Harmon <ellentharmon@gmail.com>, Rays <raybarnes05@aol.com>, <dan.danshermanlandscape@gmail.com>, Mike Izzo <mizzo@ryebrook.org> Dan: Ellen and I have now had an opportunity to meet with our landscaper, Ray Barnes, and to compare your plantings with the landscaping plan approved by the Planning Board. A few comments before I address the immediate issues. First, Ellen and I did not oppose your application to install a swimming pool when you presented your plans to the Planning Board. As you noted in an earlier conversation, our home is the property most immediately impacted by your construction, and yet we tried not be an obstruction to your plans. We very carefully reviewed your landscape plan which called for 25 plantings, ranging in height from 4 feet to nine feet along our property line. At least on paper, we were satisfied that you had acted appropriately to screen our property from any intrusion from your construction. Second, Ray never told Dan Sherman that he thought your plantings were sufficient or in compliance with the approved plans. He listened to what Dan had to say and acknowledged those statements - as having been made - not as accurate. I have copied both Ray and Dan Sherman so there will be no misunderstanding going forward. The two features of your pool installation that cause us the most visual concern are the fence installed above the retaining wall around the perimeter of the pool, and the location of the pool filter and equipment. As I am sure you know, neither the fence nor the pool equipment, as installed, are consistent with the plans submitted to and approved by the Planning Board. The pool equipment was supposed to be installed on the far side of your home away from our property. And there was no notice of a fence sitting atop the retaining wall surrounding the pool either in the application or the renderings submitted to the Planning Board which, to the contrary, clearly disclose no such fence. That was the state of affairs when the public hearing was held at the Planning Board to which we made no objection. When we first spoke, after you had gone forward to plant some non-conforming plantings, you said your landscaper had been unable to find plantings that would conform. But the fact is that you have not complied with the requirements of the approved plans. Most of what you have since referred to as "additional plantings" are simply plantings that were required in the first instance. And, even now, you have not complied with the landscape plan, either in the number, size or type of plantings. We also have concerns that many of the plantings will not survive the winter. But even were all that remedied, there remains the issue that the landscape plan was submitted and approved without consideration that a fence would be installed above the pool perimeter and that the pool equipment would be located behind the pool adjacent to our property line. Had we known that this was your ultimate intent, we would not have remained quiet. In addition, it appears that, in the construction of the rain garden, your contractor has used our fence at the base of our property, intentionally or otherwise, as a retaining wall for earth and debris. Not only does this create potential damage to our fence, it is causing water to drain through the back of our property instead of into the stream. In sum, Dan, we are not satisfied that you have met your obligations and believe that ameliorating these issues can only be accomplished by relocating the pool equipment, remedying the rain garden issue, and solving the screening issues that result in part from the installation of a fence above the retaining wall surrounding the pool and the failure to comply with the plans as approved. Mark A. Harmon E-mail from Harmons to Daniel Marks& Dan Sherman—Copy to Villaige—Jan 18, 2022 From: Mark Harmon <harmon.mark53@gmail.com> Date: Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 1:06 PM Subject: Re: Daniel Marks contact info To: Daniel Marks <dan.marks13@gmail.com>, Ellen Harmon <ellentharmon@gmail.com>, Rays <raybarnes05@aol.com>, <dan.danshermanlandscape@gmail.com>, Mike Izzo <mizzo@ryebrook.org> Dan: Ellen and I have now had an opportunity to meet with our landscaper, Ray Barnes, and to compare your plantings with the landscaping plan approved by the Planning Board. A few comments before I address the immediate issues. First, Ellen and I did not oppose your application to install a swimming pool when you presented your plans to the Planning Board. As you noted in an earlier conversation, our home is the property most immediately impacted by your construction, and yet we tried not be an obstruction to your plans. We very carefully reviewed your landscape plan which called for 25 plantings, ranging in height from 4 feet to nine feet along our property line. At least on paper, we were satisfied that you had acted appropriately to screen our property from any intrusion from your construction. Second, Ray never told Dan Sherman that he thought your plantings were sufficient or in compliance with the approved plans. He listened to what Dan had to say and acknowledged those statements - as having been made - not as accurate. I have copied both Ray and Dan Sherman so there will be no misunderstanding going forward. The two features of your pool installation that cause us the most visual concern are the fence installed above the retaining wall around the perimeter of the pool, and the location of the pool filter and equipment. As I am sure you know, neither the fence nor the pool equipment, as installed, are consistent with the plans submitted to and approved by the Planning Board. The pool equipment was supposed to be installed on the far side of your home away from our property. And there was no notice of a fence sitting atop the retaining wall surrounding the pool either in the application or the renderings submitted to the Planning Board which, to the contrary, clearly disclose no such fence. That was the state of affairs when the public hearing was held at the Planning Board to which we made no objection. When we first spoke, after you had gone forward to plant some non-conforming plantings, you said your landscaper had been unable to find plantings that would conform. But the fact is that you have not complied with the requirements of the approved plans. Most of what you have since referred to as "additional plantings" are simply plantings that were required in the first instance. And, even now, you have not complied with the landscape plan, either in the number, size or type of plantings. We also have concerns that many of the plantings will not survive the winter. But even were all that remedied, there remains the issue that the landscape plan was submitted and approved without consideration that a fence would be installed above the pool perimeter and that the pool equipment would be located behind the pool adjacent to our property line. Had we known that this was your ultimate intent, we would not have remained quiet. In addition, it appears that, in the construction of the rain garden, your contractor has used our fence at the base of our property, intentionally or otherwise, as a retaining wall for earth and debris. Not only does this create potential damage to our fence, it is causing water to drain through the back of our property instead of into the stream. In sum, Dan, we are not satisfied that you have met your obligations and believe that ameliorating these issues can only be accomplished by relocating the pool equipment, remedying the rain garden issue, and solving the screening issues that result in part from the installation of a fence above the retaining wall surrounding the pool and the failure to comply with the plans as approved. Mark A. Harmon DANIEL SHERMAN LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, P.C. 4 Broadway, Suite 9 Valhalla, NY 10595 914-824-0999 Fax: 914-824-0251 Dan.danshermanlandscapg@9maiIsom www.danshermaniandscape.com January 19, 2022 D FJ =N!2 W[ Robert Goodman - Chair Planning Department 0 Village of Rye Brook VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK 938 King Street BUILDING DEPARTMENT Rye Brook, NY 10573 Re: Application for amendment to an approved Site Plan 18 Hillandale Road: lot 135-28-1-29 Chair and Board, This letter accompanies our application for amendments to the site plan for the above referenced address dated February 11, 2021. The site plan is related to the installation of a swimming pool in the wetland buffer. The requested amendments are shown on the accompanying site plan prepared by Daniel Sherman, Landscape Architect titled, Amendment to Site Plan and dated January 20, 2022. The requested amendments are: 1. Relocation of the pool filter and equipment. The approved plan shows the pool filter at the north side of the house. The pool installation company advised that the location was both too far and at an elevation not ideal for the operation of the equipment. The pool company recommended a location at the mid-section of the south property line. To make the pool filter more hidden from the pool area and from the property to the south, it was placed instead below the rain garden retaining wall 11'-3"from the property line where a setback of 10'is required, 2. Adjustments were made to the mitigation plantings. This office has confirmed that the plant list approved with the site plan and the invoices for the plant material furnished and installed ore consis ten t as to quantity. Several varieties of plantings were substituted due to availability. Plant material sizes were reduced due to the late season availability and material supply. Additional plant material was installed along the rear south property line uDwJays uDQ 'AIln4padsab ,ono awoo sDy �oafoJd aye /,Ia:)lu MOH aaS puD ails aye �ISIn o� sJagwaw pJDoq aye. awoolam pinom am -S6UI�uDld uolp&6 lw aye p uolplpI sul aye puD gull �lwll bulJDap aH. ulq�lm �Jom puD bulpw6 'solpd puD lood aye, 4o �uawaoDld a44 ul uDld ails paAojddD aye o* aJaypD o� apDw sDm �Jo�p AJ3n3 -S. uaw�JodaQ 6ulJaau16u3 puD bulppq aye H. !M U04DUIpJ003 UI auop SDM uapJDb UIDJ aye 4 !m liom 341 '4llD:N:)DJd 103"J143N pUD SUOI�DnJasgo / pps 'SUOI j!pUO:) plat} Aq UanlJp aJaM sa6uD4:) 35-341 'IZOZ '£I/.l✓dy pa4Dp 4uaw4✓Ddap 6u1p/ing ay4 Xgpuo IZOZ LI yo✓nW uo p✓nog maenad/D✓n4oa4ryo✓y ay4 ,�q pa,io✓ddD IZOZ SZ XiDn✓qa�papa uo/d aye uo/jOR 6uiuiD4 a✓aq� jo do4 ay4 puno✓D pa//D4sui som a✓nso/oua/ood a y4 4 y6ia y//nM✓oj apoo aouaj a6D//IA puD.(4ajDs jo uol4D.Japisuoo uI p✓n.(✓oa✓ ay4 jo s✓a4aw'wad g4aou puD 4sva 'g4nos aq4 4D aouaj >IuiI uiDyo 6ui4sixa--q4 aq of aouay a✓nso/oua/ood ay4 smogs uo/d a4ls paAo✓ddo ay1 'u3pJD6 uIDJ ay+ +D IIDM 6ululD+aJ aoDJJal food ayl uo pallD4sul sDm aoua4 y + foot 'zr 4sn6n y pa44 iwgns a✓am wa4s fs papuaiun ay4 ✓oj suo/d ayl -awn/on a6o✓o4s✓a4DM w✓o4s ay4 do a>/Dw o4 pappD a✓am s✓agwoyo ✓a4Dm w✓o4s oa4/n,2 aura jo uoi4ippo aye ;jaaui6u3 a6n//iA ay4 puD✓aaui6ua 4oalb✓d ay4 Xq mama✓D&.1mo//o:If -awn/on a&ao4s pau61sap ay4 }/D y.(j✓nau 4o uap✓v6 uin✓Dui pa4lnsa✓6uipn✓6 ui a6uoyo ayl o y6ia y o padon✓4suoo sam//Dm aye '1l4a}Ds}o uoi4D✓apisuoo ay4 ul ;g jo 4q,61aq D 4D u61sap sDm uap✓n6 uro✓ay4 �D//DM 6u1u1D4a✓ ay1 -paonpaJ aJam llDm 6uluio4aJ pa�DlaJ puD uapJD6 uIDJ ayj -£ y4nos aye o4 .�✓ado✓d a y4 puD na✓o/ood ay4 uaam4 aq 6uivaa✓os ay4 aounyua o4 ✓agwaAoN ui J poo 0 o �� N?n z EE L Cb ° a n. a 'ma w�ug z �kb w ' r 05• N @@@ r�rs ye gZ, \ 4 „ LICEN o aS dom VAOCO 0 � `w,w f.�• r�� 1 4 T O s q N 1 ® u5 \\ rn �_ ,�J y�,\ \ \ C ~ O Z _ �3 s `R\ o d051 N G •` ,. _ ci " r 6 v ° C 6 r q o .o j',2 S _ m Z� O �Z •�� K• o�cmeuo J s c o7K o� .ice �{r if9 IT • �b Alc0 0 6 h 000�m�o� mo mid. � Q �sQ a�Yi«v�c" _J eE �Zo zc° m° 3� • ki •`�. , ., IL a+ L s 7 � • .. .�"'+��� ++��l��� ,R-..�ram'. • a ..... .,,......++i•.�•� �ra ` -�y + ! • 6 � � S�• �..� ..�x�.i�w�r�awlr•+M � � • � •ram. �'� i ems' .v. .�. .��► i�r 1 , �;�yell.�,�ii� �r � .Y S•. ' � � /; ' ► i: a r _7 r. ! JIM slow— •, Nt. ' • - � �� u 5 Alt �� ,is h' a• a. ti All- v�s• l� i � C: N �- _ van !11 , Odw ammmir low t •'. �► . y�IRt �. 1� �i 4r � . Y t �I y,n - r r. { l _ ? map '` t �M — F J �f :.r..fit•. - _ t !T�� • rly,a\`mot,'y �_�— ���^ _ Nr� e i rip if fl- f�Y �• 1 ,+yam ,''! , �,x� t �+• • l , �~ �w • ti `1 fa,f F �`• ,� Tarn � �i"I�� ��. a '.�{` "^ �' 'I j�._ �� for okk 1 f,•;i r � f 'yt It• , + ' r `yam; �� .f � y. � "• ,-� r y► ON 1 y.`_.1 1 r''�, •-.ice �. Mk► � F i I YVi j r+ . + 1.ij7 + ♦ f' r r 14 All IN ol qp -I dr `1,�;:� •��,. - ` i 1, � � S 44. ` S IL 16 an r r � EXHIBIT 2 Pennella Contracting Inc WC#27561H15/CT#HIC0641846/PC#PC7084 T 261 Fields Lane TEL: 914-277-6977 Cell:914-490-0261/914-755-5499 1 Brewster NY 10509 Email: Pennellaci@aol.com Web: Pennellaci.com To Mr. Harmon at 16 Hillandale Road: I am the owner of Pennella Contracting, a 30-year-old landscaping/masonry/excavating business based out of Brewster, NY. Part of my business involves working alongside pool companies as well as trenching for electric and propane service to pool filters. I have viewed the property at 18 Hillandale Road from the Harmon residence at 16 Hillandale Road and have had a chance to review the engineers plans from January 14t" 2021. Based on my review, I saw no reason why the pool equipment could not have been placed at the north end of the pool, away from the Harmon's property, at the time of construction. C. Ge ry P ella: ; f � + G q Y J . all i = -= ,_40 fi� ■Y i Pelwe&v Home Services Gallery Contact CHECK US OUT ON i6m&adhW fACEB00K& INS TAGRAM 914-277 6977 Excavating- Masonry © Landscaping- Outdoor Living - Landscape Design VIEW Se/vim We specialize in excavating, masonry, landscaping, Outdoor living, Landscape low volt lighting & Landscape designing Landscaping Excavating Masonry We provide full landscaping services: Excavating Services: Repairing,maintaining 8 altering planting(any size trees,scrubs, foundations,drainage,septic brick,stone,tile or ceramic perennials,flowers),new lawns, work,driveways,trenches for structures&surfaces Property Maintenance Fall and spring electrical and water lines. cleanup,weekly maintenance,pruning Hydroseeding Outdoor Living Outdoor Lighting Specialize in Outdoor kitchens,BBQ, fire pits fi patios Landscape Designing OcsV 2023 by Landsacpe Gardner.Proudly created with Wlx.com YAVT 41. •i�;�1� ems. .. r '1 ` • j EXHIBIT 3 /'� �. I � i y r. 7-7 n As new apartments and homes become smaller due to the high costs of land and construction,it pays to have a home with an intelligent use of space.Glass fences on balconies and across yards provide expansive views while making a home feel larger and more inviting.Yards feel open and reveal attractive scenery,and balcony glass railings make the most of any surrounding views.And the new styles of frameless glass railings make glass railings seem to disappear altogether. Sophisticated Aesthetic The majority of balcony and pool glass designs leave a lot to be desired.They are unattractive,block views of your pool and yard,and make the areas they surround uninviting.Glass pool fences allow for the same safety features as other fences but with less visual weight,creating an expansive yard feel while supplying attractive views of the pool,gardens and scenery beyond.And the designs are beautiful.Clear glass panels are attractive on their own,and combined with their minimal hardware and refined metal treatments,these fences provide an appealing design that blends beautifully with any home—modern or traditional.Instead of pulling away from the beauty of the surrounding home and garden,these glass fences display the surroundings in all their glory for an ultra-sophisticated look. Configured to Fit Any Custom Layout i Now These fences contain a minimal amount of parts,allowing for a large amount of customization.Glass,as a material,is highly customizable.Using it as fencing allows for exacting heights and configurations that wrap around any pool or yard shape.You can choose from a range of connecting parts to create just the right look and feel to match your home and personal preference. Industry Discounts Available: A significant benefit of glass fencing is that the quality,look,and overall appeal makes for better resale value for a home.Buyers appreciate the expansive views and less cluttered feel these fences provide.In addition,the ease of customization and high production runs means builders can benefit from industry discounts for volume.No matter what size project,glass fences can be produced to maximize the discount for a lower overall price.And since these companies excel at high-volume orders,they are willing to discount for ongoing work with contractors,architects and designers. Clear Glass Fencing:A Trend That Mai last a 1-iretime was last m(Med:June 251h.2019 by Lucy Previous articleWhat are Some Plastering Problems and Ways to Identify Them1 Next articleHow to Fund Your Home Improvement Projgpl lot. Lucy Related Posts Sabbge Sans Poudre What are some signs that you should replace a metal roof What should you do when you have visible broken roof shingto How Homeowners Deal with Water Damage& ns for Repair ;6"F imp"Ill RPM a. ■0, . ► • VAI e4b .y I �•1\ '�.'?�7t ��7' � '7i'l •a.- `'try _`, _. h •` - `I tip r �`. l� �... r � , .• ! (https-//aquaviewfencing.com/) HOME GLASS POOL FENCES GLASS RAILINGS GLASS GATES PROJECTS NEWS CONTACT 8 7 7-2 2 9-7 0 3 4 Get a free glass pool fence estimate GET A FREE QUOTE �. btps` qua ncing.com/ . slid y.. x ••t1 HOM : . PROD CT W TACT 877- 29- 1 1 } 1 r � Y Superior Durability While it may appear delicate,Aquaview glass pool fencing is extremely strong and durable.We use v4" thick tempered safety glass which is six times stronger than regular glass. Our glass pool fencing systems are engineered to withstand severe weather and heavy use, setting the industry standard for superior quality and durability. (J�tps://aquaviewfencing.com/) s Low Maintenance HOME GLASS POOL FENCES GLASS RAILINGS GLASS GATES Made with tempered safety glass and marine grade stainless steel, our pool fences are built to last a Lifetime. Our Duplex stainless steel hardware is resistant to corrosion and rust. Unlike traditional fencing, there is no refinishing or upkeep required. Cleaning is easy and infrequent. A simple wipe PROJECTS NEWS CONTACT 8 7 7-2 2 9-7 0 3 4 down with mild soapy water every few months will keep your glass fence sparkling. ontact us for a free estimate GET A FREE QUOTE Proudly Serving North America 1-877-229-7034 (te1:18772297034) sales@aquaviewfencing.com (mailto:sales@aquaviewfencing.com) @ (https://www.instagram.com/aquaviewfencing/) f (https://www.facebook.com/aquaviewfencing) 1 . n t'1` 4/14/22,3:02 PM Residential Projects-Glass Fences I Aquaview Fencing (https://aquaviewfencing.com/) HOME GLASS POOL FENCES GLASS RAILINGS GLASS GATES R P �fffE ►� T1 ActT�Tp"IbTC°(4TS HOME (HTTPS://AQUAVIEWFENCING.COM/) / RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS America's Trusted Glass Pool Fence Provider From Coast To Coast GET QUOTATION file:///C:/Users/dpinnock/AppData/LocaUTemp/wzfadc/Residential Projects-Glass Fences—Aquaview Fencing.html 112 4/14/22,3:02 PM Residential Projects-Glass Fences i Aquaview Fencing (https://aquaviewfencing.com/) HOME GLASS POOL FENCES GLASS RAILINGS GLASS GATES ProUdI l7ingTNOrtII FAFA ri&pNTACT 8 7 7-2 2 9-7 0 3 4 1-877-229-7034 (te1:18772297034) sales@aquaviewfencing.com (mailto:sales@aquaviewfencing.com) ® (https://www.instagram.com/aquaviewfencing/) f (https://www.facebook.com/aquaviewfencing) file:///C:/Users/dpinnock/AppData/Local/Temp/wzfadc/Residential Projects-Glass Fences—Aquaview Fencing.html 2/2 EXHIBIT 4 Rav 3 S 5 Nedley Lane Greenwich, CT 06831 Landscape services LLG Ph: 203-862-9271 Fx: 203-813-3388 March 25, 2022 To: The Planning Board, Village of Rye Brook Re, Amended Plans, 18 Hillandale Road I have been the landscaper for the Harmons at 16 Hillandale Road for several years, and am very familiar with their property, as well as the area I'm writing this with regard to the amended plans submitted by the Markses for 18 Hillandale Road, and to give my view of certain statements that I understand have been made on behalf of the Markses. 1) 1 do not see that 9 trees, in addition to those on the original plans, have been planted along the Harmons' property line. Nor do I agree based on my inspection that there are so many plantings along the property line, there is hardly room for any more to be made. There are large and obvious gaps in the plantings that would allow for additional plantings to be made_ 2) The plantings that were made are significantly smaller than what was on the original plans. Relying on them to grow one or two feet each year in order to provide screening several years from now is uncertain and should not be counted on. There are currently insufficient plantings, in both size and quantity, to screen from the Harmons' property around the pool fence, pool equipment or the rain garden. 3) The statement that larger plantings as required by the original plans submitted were not available is not in line with my experience as a landscaper. Larger plantings have always been available in my work from one supplier or another. As a landscaper, I have been purchasing plantings for my clients throughout the pandemic and have found that while prices have increased, availability was there_ 4) Relying on the few small plantings in the rain garden to take root and grow by this summer to absorb the standing water is uncertain — they were planted in 2021 and have not yet done so; it remains to be seen whether they will take root and whether they will absorb all of the accumulating water within a 24 hour period or longer. There is currently standing water in the rain garden for days at a time. 5) There is a significant increase in mud and water flowing from the neighbor's property onto the Harmon's back yard since the construction, as well as debris accumulating against the Harmon's fence at the bottom of their property. Sincerely, Ray Baynes EXHIBIT 5 Vito \ r..^ �• .A1 j" ♦ r Jt . - C. +�•.� - ....y'. �/Via" T I * f~ •�vY�1' � z /r ,,.�_ ,z.•? r1� �' 1. _ -., �.. r �4 ♦,.I •C'��.. � 1 ��,` yL _ .. -,�•y / �i�• � � `dam'' �' �i � J'� 'r � -. w •► ..�t-?� �4` i'"t+rC .... •,' `y!�{ }..,! ��� 1. a•f' { ,if *'-./._ ;.�ya.�/ � /•_''Vz ~i .fix' '.. e' .:. c .rah. i�iy }' r (~ ��• T, �may►. IF ob {� '�-� •� _ ..�• _ .w' - `.Sr�- �ti••,t.�• ate,.; � - '�a'�_ .: `�•.+z x � '1+ � �� �� ��°... _ I �_� � / �f`-.? -1'j s� '' ,�rrc"�".'t• .- i t 1'X - ♦'' �yl � .'T' S / .Fj.r .,.'yf i _� 4� ,'J a[+' ":�1.• ate. / • `1 Ir tN11' Y• r. t �� '�1 � -. � r•�t�F' lip bs,, ,i s 10 � f it,� ,. •1, _ / -- !�"'La �� ,� .i Z T rrs .�vvc nF r ` is r r. �„� 4 ,• ._ /�t. - ` .-� it ,�. 41 ,.`;.. .`IAA?• ♦ '@. ��: `� l • L. Op air � ��. 1 };,��w. � s< -_y• ':1 add !C r , � �'. .�• ,',,� �,y' .ry f �- ,.-+. � � � •/t � � ` r PIZ AA ����. .. ��♦..��. i � I 1 I�,1�+�i 1 .:e +N��'�A���.i a.' h 1!� fiii'. . .•�;4� i •1 + I 1 EXHIBIT 6 ?j '�► 1 ,f S. r . '•�- � 1, _ � � ` '_ � � -�1 ` ti � � � 1 � i p i,•j � ice}•( j�� ... 41 Asw auk up r 19 rc OL ri AL 14 .91 VOL In s !j}, Jr � p N • jol ad • l•1r / T lit .g +•• ',,o � . soy �- • s `J �� ;4� `+ �I � ts 14 f• wi— '-r' Awl l � Aft ♦ s►— I � � iir'�� APL Pli tIWO mil►• '"��-s r 1 iF t 41 eft 1 Ja e I � � tit : l • - � A� r� 1 � 4 � t � r � r .ai y,ej � � Y I I f ollt se � 1 r • ��` '��[-�..}w _. � • ` 'rf��1��•S' T .�i: ` �/� �r�z CSC'.+ -'� r.-�. ,f�'�•+/• �`�C����r�`r���\� ' r+�•�. .. ���.i��SZ�•. 11� _ y ' � -c/ _s.� ." �trr`\``a�4cct I '`�• � '], .�A, •� :' ("�1 lb lip pV ('�1^ •�1 � ��IYT�� ,j,�:�"�.� � �'�"`' ��•yam, 1','►'.',�+�t�2/ y�'d° t y_ �-:"ii•�. 1��. � I /J, '� '�'.'• f•+• �Y.rr�` • ..fir.- ' �, J•���/' � � ..ICI✓1-..: / ,/+ ; _1, . '�,� � \� � •-1._ -.-. �'f, db •f- / ,. l ."� 1�;�;.� l � ��•�. !1 ,��''1,� L �,� It 416 -, I. v --• `" lit11..1 N�� A „ '+S 14 Ic lae al -� '!'IY' .,y.. 4^ •y' a•`.ir, '`I `ram i�lt'Y_ �.*.' - {,_r� !I• '1,- �..7��r�� x'L r.M��•.Ys ��,y,�._1.. : 7� ,� y�� �t�1+� `r � -,\ - / i il�i ,• IL- . .}• (T' Irl IiY�* �. � Y� �,.-Q;f• �ar %lam a � •�' `�:�_���lr'•'� `► •" f, .� -ir �r� t�7. pI � �,. � r^., �`><•+ j 2. 1 .l..t ' �'Ir •t 4 '• z, 'Al xy.. 'L Y• �. it �'kL7 n - �-tl.. ram/'�.UL �i, e sx .; i •�•W� '�������J���f�'�C� { � ;Af. '�, 1,• ff► 1• �� `f re.•tl� G f�_ i w ' I '• r �r1 .., r i:.4 OP ' i .'1� . . '_ ♦ �'- . •� ' fir+- � �1'` �� '' ../. - , ', s`. _ -� +! '� t `�, :•fie y, ,'+• • 1R•- ( 1, '�M, r � ;.'1�I'.w' 'N .i�� , r••� s fit. y. i f iit f i I re _•'rY��� . /��1. ,1, 1!!r ,�, •. yr S. 44 _ irk lb �`•'�AA, +•` Ai oo 71 far ,�` / � �34�14I.• `-yea .-_ .•3. . as .t. , •..���E:J•1� tiiiiif��li '.:t'�• ' .�- 1A~�:~..1 'r,r.i.4., qk 4. 41 Olt AM E.'`Y 1 1 _ �,- '�`.- fl _ ,�,•.�•ts' 1 - ��'�.et� 1 ;�•. f MOM S•t*Tp- .I�r/� P 'r. '"7f'�^��' � ' - ----- S'f � 1 " 1 � � r } V�I'' =:Yr t r,.� �ft'�''+�,'r;;s:��:�'{•• :�,. �r .,-� f •'j ' 1� � ,,� � � .,�,�• < `I 1_«{J e C � Y! ./ �,f�t�"��'tt.; � ^,r-r'f�. .'; f, J. �1�>�"L ..'l,�' .. t 1*�'� i `trl � 1l� ��• /� � "IJ,1 r>~,. i � � i� i•1� i! r ;F4�,•S�. w• fit. � r�ti�i.�-�' � 1 �� ` �R, `ram ;��'`' ,'��1���... .�`;�d✓y�- �,v� �+�, ,�. ;�•. - �t � 1. .+•' �`'(R`0( � ���1^^:�.. .'��'�'�+� , f�*a/�,',��,\� \\'^1 1 �_,`�� \�._� �`krz� �,ai�. _�.%:... ;\- .:� •'!Y�,�' •.yI^� s•.4,�y, �S'•' i�� ♦ '1`L •1_ �„�t►` ... �iFf ZZ ov •. ,� •`- '; *��•„�;,,_.�.�� 'fit' may' R %►+' t "'.,t�� -. Yt �•( , ,. . ''1'I�T .fir ,\' �� \ , ';~~- `.YJw�c.. , .`�J1` 1.,� 1 �tt�` �� i �.,, ,_ R"� C ,4� *•^- :.' -IY'+, ����� 4�,��T� � v• - �\.• ��t t• ems, � 'j• ' �• '.7.. ,1Yi � �T �r\4 �� �•_ � t. y�•� '. ♦ .! � s _ -rr��'��-`ram•� \�?'�, �-! .. Awl low- 10, � /�l.�' 'qll✓ ''�.•Y/ 'L•L..` �^ "•�. 1• a . 't ti�' �,' 'Ai!�„`{ �� - '_'.�� V';y� ice. �a'` of kra— f r_ \ -1 4Irl i�l�y�` ..,r�'_;,may ,j,,r f�� ��\ 9 u.. ,,r ✓' i� i f Y /[�,r- ,{.A �� �1 �` � � ��,1'4.l"'_ '� al`i'�•.v \ �.^ J' ,F 1 ��-•.•w _ - // r �/- �. 41 I, �' �. �'`KfI1s�'�� 1 � �l �-�• - '"*'v' � 11� -� \ «�1.'t' _ _ vim' _ '�+` ,,. � _I li'� ♦ d� 7ri, ``. ilk - i. `.`�+GPM,` ,,., _ r "'� � \`�'/,. f I'' • �`r �+"Y1.'4a ' '. `�-- 1��+ ,+; ��`` .,y , � { ^• 1ff R �� t i;.\�}; .f .�; ~ � .� `y��: r ,�, ti- }-, f,��-:"•� , 1;-/-1r��-•�• of j; ..a rY!"� 'i _'Y' 7^ '�I S' : .it �� •�, t,T r.e. .•� 1 v ,r 1}•t Q �� I `/ ;�T ,� �.►J T; `. :J1� ,. ON .. •+� yam_ �'�i�"���44 �� _ •�R��'d Bey may. '.? Sr c Ta.. . A s•' l�„i—+ �>A+} / Y ��II ;, _,+ ,,? _. 1 v. •`F�� •+,,,,t,:� �'. r CAS �*��.'t� .1F �., r._ � :r � .. e� u � �A, i J,. r'ir• �-rlly � � +Y `�/ \i.�'1�r3��`.�f .� ( 1r,, ;Y�}fP � �;�r 1 r w .. • ( ;+f� + J��'>� Y',' \ (,� _ i �` y��1 l�lf A'4"� :, 'r✓R �''�' 1- 'nr,;.�` ,4_.2 �~ �s ` ��f � 1 t � � fir- � t �•' r\ • r "fit .,, � ,' \: •�� �.`y.Y 1 r, >,� «�T'c17�i Tj ���d�,`,�:•� �`�•)`r�1 � 1�� �1r"r' �"��, � J. 1 r:. t�l � � �• r�/�,O'ttff t (�`\•t]'-- !r �� F���. VI�I.'� /1" ' � •G�..!�i �Ir � \' �" r, x �. .,r ' �Itr Nam ."•\t.a�1 %- '�.\� \ � '. ' /' , , ,1 �-.rs► `� '' eil��rL�� _` �t�yL .* Al IL 4 - -' k\ ! _ � 1t` r L)•(I(j��c �'.I�- `� f-..�� 4 f1�1 � �� I :�-1.�,•I�-� ,r. i �`_ +Y y/'^ram_ �'1 � �• � � �.•.+! ' ll� �'i1I1j� r9'f'•.1� by i.� �t r ,'• rZ ��� ,';1L �w�r I x` N - NOW "' r ,..• •. ly `J ♦ 4 yT-_,,!• ,+' ^-a�"r, ji• Ll .r.i1,;� _ t•f �' * N s.` ` t.:+ � l�Fj�'X`Y 41 4* t \^ALP-• \ _.'N' f,,r .,`- �.- y." ��/r,� ''+'7' h4 EXHIBIT 7 ed° rs� Cornell University 10 Patriot Hills Drive V Stony Point,NY 10980 Cooperative Extension Phone: (845)429-7085 Rockland County Fax: (845)429-8667 Let www.cce.comell.edu/rockland/ Installing a Rain Garden What Is a Rain Garden and What Does it Do? A rain garden looks like an ornamental perennial garden,but contains a shallow depression that is designed to collect and filter stormwater that runs off nearby hard surfaces,such as roofs,driveways or walkways.Most rain gardens have a ponding depth of only a few inches,and are expected to hold water for just a day or so.The water leaving the garden may enter a storm drain system,or seep into the ground,where it can help to renew our groundwater—especially important in Rockland County,where we depend primarily on wells for our water.The ornamental plants in the rain garden slow the rate of stormwater runoff and help to reduce flooding and erosion.In addition,the vegetation may remove pollutants that could enter our waterways.A properly constructed rain garden will hold and filter approximately 30 percent more rainfall than the same area covered by a lawn. Choosing a Site The optimal site for a rain garden is in full sun.Because the garden is a valuable ornamental feature,place it where it will best fit into your existing landscape and where you will enjoy the view.Many people place their gardens near their homes to catch runoff from the roof. A rain garden should trap water from an average rainfall.Take note of the direction of flow and destination of runoff leaving your roof,driveway or other hard surface during a moderate to heavy shower.The rain garden should be positioned on a relatively level surface in the path of runoff between the source and destination.The site should be at least ten feet away from the foundation of a house or outbuilding,and at least 25 feet from a well head or septic system.You will need to make sure that any overflow from the garden is directed to an appropriate place, such as a storm drain,were it will not impact neighboring properties.Before you get started,call Dig Safe NY at 1-800-962-7962 to locate and protect any underground utilities. As the slope of the land increases,so does the depth of a rain garden.The bottom of the garden should be as level as possible. A rain garden on a steep slope would require special engineering and may not be practical.Most rain gardens are designed with one side much longer than the other,and stretch across the path of runoff or slope to catch the maximum volume of water possible. Since the purpose of a rain garden is to filter stormwater,the soil underneath the garden should drain easily, preferably within 24 hours.If you have standing water or a very high water table,the site is a candidate for a wetland garden instead of a rain garden(contact Cooperative Extension for assistance).You can conduct a simple percolation test for drainage by digging a hole roughly a foot in depth when the soil surface is somewhat dry.If the hole fills with water,stop and locate your rain garden elsewhere. If the hole remains dry,rough up the sides and fill it with water.Wait 12 to 24 hours;if the water has drained away,the site should be suitable. As long as size of the area that serves as the source of runoff from a given site is taken into account,the size and depth of a rain garden are flexible.A typical rain garden covers 100 to 300 square feet.A shallow garden will need to be wider than a deeper, narrower site to trap the same amount of water.If your yard will not accommodate a large garden,consider using two or more small sites,or simply the largest area that is reasonable.To calculate how large to make your garden,measure and add together the square foot area of the portions of your roof,driveway,or other surfaces that will drain into the garden,then consult the following chart: Building Strong and Vibrant New York Communities Cornell Cooperative Extension provides equal program and employment opportunities,NYS College of Agricultural and life Sciences,NYS College of Human Ecology,and NYS College of Veterinary Medicine at Cornell University,Cooperative Extension associations,county governing bodies,and U.S.Department of Agriculture,cooperating Impermeable Required Size of Potential Rain Required Size of Potential Rain Surface Area* Rain Garden Garden Rain Garden Garden (6"deep) Dimensions (3"deep) Dimensions (ft x ft) (ft x ft) 800 ft2 40 ft2 4X10,5X8,6X7 80 ft2 7X12,8X10,9X9 1000 ft2 50 ft2 5X10,6X8 l00 ft2 7xl5, 1OX10 1200 ft2 60 ft 2 4X 15,5X 12,6X 10, 120 ft2 I OX 12,8X 15 8X8 1400 ft' 70 ft2 5X 14,7X 10 140 ft2 I OX 14,7X20 1600 ft' 80 ft2 7X 12,8X 10,9X9 160 ft' 8X20, 1 OX 16 1800 ft2 90 ft2 6X 15,7X 13, 8X 12, 180 ft' 9X20,1 OX 18, 9X10 12X15 2000 ft2 100 ft2 7x l 5, 1 OX 10 200 ft2 1 OX20, 14X 15 2500 ft2 125 ft2 8X 16,I OX 13 250 ft' I OX25, 13X20, 15X17 3000 ft2 150 ft2 1 OX 15, 12X 13 300 ft2 1 OX30, 15X20 3500 ft' 175 ft2 9X20, 12X 15 350 ft2 14X25, 18X20 4000 ft 2 200 ft2 I OX20, 14X 15 400 ft2 16X25,20X20 5000 ft 2 250 ft2 1 OX25, 13X20, 500 ft2 20X25 15X17 Source:North Carolina State University Cooperative Extension;reprinted with permission. *Roof,driveway,or other surface that serves as a source of runoff. Constructing the Garden Use a string,rope or hose to outline the footprint of your garden.When you excavate,create a gentle slope into the center of the garden from the edge,then remove the soil inside to the desired depth of the finished garden,plus additional depth to accommodate any intended additions,such as compost or mulch.A minimum of a couple of inches of mulch are recommended-for example,if a three inch ponding area is desired,dig to a depth of at least five inches. Keep the bottom of the garden as level as possible. If your garden is on a slope,use the excavated soil from the uphill side to level out the downhill side. Save some soil to build a berm. If you cannot finish the excavation of the garden in one session,mulch the area to prevent erosion until you can complete the task. To keep runoff contained in the garden and give the water a better chance to seep into the ground,build a berm of mounded earth around the lower perimeter of the garden,or on the side opposite the source of the water flow if the ground is level.The sides of the berm should slope gently. You may leave a slight depression in one or more parts of the berm for overflow-to reduce erosion,these areas may be covered with decorative stones that allow water to pass through.The soil of the berm should be firmly compacted,then planted with grass or a dense groundcover. If you would like to hide the berm,you may plant more perennials or shrubs beyond the outside edge.Be sure to mulch the berm to prevent erosion while the plants become established. An attachment(available at hardware stores)which spreads out water that drains off a roof can be connected to a downspout and positioned to direct the flow of stormwater toward your rain garden.This helps to distribute the water that enters the garden evenly.Alternatively,you may use a downspout extension or buried PVC piping to deliver water directly to the garden. If you cannot reach into the center of the garden from the edge,consider adding a raised pathway,constructed of material such as gravel or stone for access.This will allow you to maintain the garden without compacting the soil. Planting the Garden Plant Selection: The plants in a rain garden must be able to withstand alternating periods of wet and dry soil,as well as occasional flooding.Many of our attractive native plants will handle these conditions.Natives often require less maintenance than exotic ornamentals;these tough plants generally do not require fertilizer or pesticide applications;some are deer resistant.Native plants are also less likely to take over the garden than non-natives. A mixture of species with varying forms,heights and bloom times will add diversity and interest to your rain garden.As in a traditional perennial garden,repeating blocks or drifts of plants(mostly in odd-number groupings) will have a pleasing effect. Use the chart below as a starting point for plant selection: Perennials Latin Name Common Name Height Bloom Time A uile is canadensis Columbine 2' Spring Amsonia spp. Blue star 2-3' E.Summer Ascle ias incarnata Swamp Milkweed 24 L. Spring Aster novae an liae New England Aster 1-6' Summer-Fall Chelone spp. Turtlehead 14 L.Summer- E.Fall Cimicifuga spp. Black Snakeroot, 4-T Summer-Fall Fairy Candles Eu atorium spp. Joe P e Weed,Mist Flower 4-6' L.Summer Fili endula rubra Meadowsweet 4-6' Summer Geranium maculatum Cranesbill 8-15" L.Spring Iris versicolor Blue Flag 24 L.Spring Liatris s icata Blazing Star,Gayfeather 1-3' Summer Lobelia cardinalis Cardinal Flower 24' Summer Monarda did ma Bee Balm 14 Summer Oneothera spp. Evening Primrose, Sundro 1-2' Summer Ph soste is vir iniana Obedient Plant 24' L. Summer-Fall Solida o spp. Goldenrod 1-6' L. Summer-Fall Vernonia noveboracensis New York Ironweed 4-8' L.Summer-Fall Ferns Latin Name Common Name Height Onoclea sensibilis Sensitive Fern 1-2' Osmunda cinnamomea Cinnamon Fern 2-3' Osmunda re alis Royal Fern 2-3' Grasses Latin Name Common Name Height Bloom Time Andro 0 on gerardii Big Bluestem 3-T L.Summer-Fall Calama rostis acuti ora Feather Reed Grass 4-6' Summer-Fall Carex spp. Sedge 6-36" L. Spring- E. Summer Chasmanthium lati olium Northern Sea Oats 2-4' L. Summer Panicum virgatum Switch Grass 3-8' Summer- L.Summer Shrubs Latin Name Common Name Height Bloom Time Aronia spp. Chokebe 3-12' Spring Callicar a americana Beaut ben 4-8' Summer Ce halanthus occidentalis Buttonbush 3-10' L.Summer Clethra alni olia Summersweet 6-10' L.Summer Cornus stoloni era Red Twig Dogwood 7-9' L.Spring-E.Summer Ilex glabra,I. verticillata Inkberry,Winterbe 3-12' L.Spring-E. Summer Itea vir inica Virginia Sweet Spire 3-9' L.Spring Lindera benzoin S icebush 6-12' Spring Sambucus canadensis Elderberry 6-12' L.Spring Vaccinum spp. Blueberry 2-12' L.Spring Viburnum spp. Viburnum 2-18' S ringy Planting the Garden: Other than excavation to create the depression that holds stormwater and the construction of the berm,preparing a rain garden is similar to that of other perennial borders.Most of the plants will benefit from an addition of an inch or so of compost incorporated into the soil.This will improve drainage and supply organic matter that holds moisture during a dry spell,and is especially helpful during establishment. If possible,set your plants out in early spring so they may begin to develop a good root system before the stress of summer heat. Start out with plants that have well established root systems—these will be able to withstand a flood without washing away,and will fill in more quickly than plants started from small plugs or seed. Set the plants at the recommended spacing for the species. If you use containerized plants,you can move them around in their pots to try different patterns and combinations before you settle on a permanent design. Dig planting holes deep enough to accommodate plants' root balls.Make sure that the crowns of the plants will be set in the garden at the same level that they had grown in their containers;or in the case of transplants,in the original landscape. Dig and loosen the soil of an area at least twice as wide as the root ball,then set the plant in, firm the soil gently to remove air pockets,and water well.Finally, spread two inches of mulch to cover the garden soil.Use a heavy mulch,such as hardwood,that will not float away in a heavy rain.Do not pile mulch around the plants' crowns or stems. Maintenance Your newly planted garden will require regular watering for the first season,or until the plants are established. Unless drought restrictions are in effect,supplemental water should be applied whenever there has not been an inch of rainfall in the previous week,and a soaking rain is not predicted.Once the garden is established,it will not require additional water unless there is a long,dry spell(where any wilted plants do not perk up after dark). As in any other perennial garden,weeds must be kept to a minimum,especially during establishment. Inspect the garden regularly and remove any unwanted vegetation before it takes hold.The mulch layer will naturally suppress many weeds. Renew the mulch at least once a year,or as it decomposes.The composted mulch will supply adequate nutrients for the native plants in your garden—you will not need to add additional fertilizer. Check the water inflow and overflow areas occasionally; clear them out as necessary.To prevent a layer of debris from filling the ponding area of the garden, remove dead stems and leaves as they accumulate. Prune and thin woody plants as necessary.Cut herbaceous perennials and grasses back to four or six inches each spring,before new growth emerges. Over time,you may also need to remove layers of silt or sediment that accumulate in the depression. At this point, you may want to divide plants that are crowded or fill gaps left by plants that have failed to thrive. Sources: Bannerman, Roger,University of Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources,and Ellen Considine, U.S. Geological Survey;Rain Gardens:A How-to Manual for Homeowners clean-water.uwex.edu/pubs/rain ag rden; Coffman,Larry S., and Derek A. Winogradoff;Prince George's County,MD, Department of Environmental Resources, Program Planning Division, The Bioretention Manual www.pnncegeorgescountymd.gov Cornell Cooperative Extension of Onondaga County;www.cce.comell.edu/onondaiza Grantham,Deb,Assistant Director,Cornell Cooperative Extension, Natural Resources and Environment, Senior Extension Associate,Department of Crop&Soil Sciences Obropta,Christopher,Vivian Quinn and William Sciarappa; Rutgers Cooperative Extension Fact Sheet: Rain Gardens www.rcre.rutizers.edu Rockland County Soil and Water Conservation District. http://www.co.rockIand.nv.us/environ/water/RainGarden.pd Rozzell,Lara,Extension Associate,University of North Carolina Cooperative Extension,Biological and Agricultural Engineering, Ecosystem Assessment and Restoration; www.bae.ncsu.edu/topic/raingarden Chris Shankar,Rockland County Master Gardener. Prepared by: Amy Albam, Horticulture Lab Technician Neither Cornell Cooperative Extension,Cornell University nor any representative thereof makes any representation of any warranty,express or implied,of any particular result or application of the information contained herein or regarding any product.It is the sole responsibility of the user to read and follow all product labeling instructions and to check with the manufacturer or supplier for the most recent information. Nothing contained in this information should be interpreted as an express or implied endorsement of any particular products or criticism of unnamed products. The information on pest management for New York State contained in this publication is dated February 2007. The user is responsible for obtaining the most up-to-date pest management information. Contact any Cornell Cooperative Extension county office or PMEP (help:Upmep.cce.cornell.edu/), the Cornell Cooperative Extension pesticide information website.The information herein is no substitute for pesticide labeling.The user is solely responsible for reading and following manufacturer's labeling and instructions Hort 115 2/07 NEW 'FORK FATE Recreation Control -• • • Re(jUlatory Home » Public Involvement and News » Living the Green Life » Keep Water Clean » Create a Rain Garden Create a Rain Garden Plant a Lush Oasis and Stop Polluted Runoff Ferns are a great choice for a more natural looking rain garden Storm water running off rooftops, sidewalks, driveways, and streets washes pollutants into nearby streams. As if that weren't bad enough, as storm water rushes over these hard-or impervious-surfaces, it picks up speed and force, causing local flooding and erosion. Impervious surfaces also keep rain water and snowmelt from seeping into the soil and recharging groundwater aquifers. A rain garden can change all that. Planted in a shallow depression with plants such as ferns, cardinal flower, swamp milkweed, turtlehead and others that don't mind occasional "wet feet," a lush and luxuriant rain garden captures runoff from impervious areas and allows it to seep slowly into the ground. Concerned about mosquitos? Rain gardens are designed to hold standing water for less than 24 hours so that mosquitos can't breed. The New York State Stormwater Management Design Manual, Section 9.5 has detailed information on the design, installation and maintenance of a rain garden (see Important Links). See the Offsite links at the right for more about how to design and install a rain garden. Make sure the plants you choose are hardy in your zone. https://www.dec.nv.gov/public/44330.html Y �1 �TENTH ., CRE . F: PERMA CULTURE FOR THE SUBURBS HOME ABOUT START HERE BOOKS & COURSES CATEGORIES RESOURCES Search this website (� Home/Article/ How to Build a Rain Garden to Capture Runoff How to Build a Rain Garden to Capture Runoff Last Updated February 11 th,2022 by A y. 12 Comments Learn how to build a rain garden that captures rainwater runoff from hard surfaces, such as a roof or pavement, for irrigation or to reduce water pollution. 'kL HOW TO BUILD A RAIN GARDEN �. a r, TO CAPTURE RUNOFF `r } 6 This page may contain affiliate links. Please read my disclosure for more info. Why build a rain garden? When Mr. TAF and I moved into our first house, we were excited to transform our yard into a garden. One of our first goals was to reduce our home's stormwater runoff. That's because stormwater runoff is a jaadbg cause of water pollution in the United States. I had recently learned that runoff from our roof picks up bird droppings, dirt, bacteria and air pollutants and sends them into the storm drain, which empties directly into the local watershed. Not good! Especially when there are simple strategies, like a rain garden, that can capture the runoff, filter it, and turn it into a useful resource. This filtered water can irrigate a garden, support local wildlife, and replenish the local watershed. We didn't know anything about building a rain garden back then, so we hired a local guy. He installed a pretty neat setup by our back patio, including three rain barrels. After a couple of years, we felt more confident and redesigned the rain garden to make better use of the space. Then we went on to create a second rain garden in our front yard. Through all three rain garden designs, I learned a lot about the process, which I'll share with you in this article. Rain Garden i.o included three rain barrels and perennial plants like yarrow,rhubarb,sage,and dogwood. What is a rain garden, exactly? A rain garden is a shallow depression in the ground designed to temporarily catch water from an impermeable surface such as a roof, driveway, parking lot, or even the overflow from a rain barrel. It uses the power of gravity to collect water moving down a natural slope. A berm on the downhill side of the depression temporarily holds in the water. In this collection basin, rainwater can percolate into the ground rather than run off. The basin is planted with deep-rooted plants that drink up the excess water. Using soil and plants is nature's way of slowing and filtering rainwater. It mimics the earth's natural hydrological processes. Strategically capturing stormwater, "becomes an on-site asset rather than a liability," says Brad Lancaster, author of Rainwater Harvesting for Qry/ nds and BeyQd. A rain garden makes perfect sense in a permaculture-designed landscap-e, where the focus is on working with nature and making use of available resources. A properly built stormwater basin isn't a wetland, nor is it a mosquito factory. As a temporary collection basin, it drains within 12-24 hours. Ready to build your own beautiful rain garden? Illustration from The Suburban Micro-Farm:Modern Solutions for Busy People. Would you like to learn more about smart water management to reduce maintenance in your garden? NORTHolllilw Bill Pay IJl11rrS.1:aJ1 ;. ,_ 1JJiS�lilf�rS r�l, iLJ ,SU11i i'a/E`JsMf3 1'JJ!JL'Ulr"Off�YLlSlt` CLIStOnler Set-vice Rain Gardens What Is a Rain Garden? L Online Bill Pay A rain garden is a landscaped area,planted with wildflowers and other native vegetation,that soaks up rain water,mainly from the roof of a building or a low y •Water Service Maintenance area that captures runoff.They are generally planted in a shallow depression • Payment Options where it will intercept storm water runoff.Rain gardens also need good drainage so that water runs off within a 24-hour period,to avoid creating a mosquito habitat. • Water Pressure Questions t�rr'• Lawn grasses are not effective at • Start/Stop Service capturing rain water.Unlike native plants that have deep root •Toilet Leak? systems,lawns have shallow Photo courtesy of the Cttyof Bumavillite,MN roots.It's estimated that as much and Barr Engineering Co. ' as 80%of rain water will run off a Site Search " lawn,depending on the density of the turf. enter keyword(s) t� Why Install a Rain Garden? Contact Us Photo courtesy of ue EPA There are many benefits of a rain garden,some more visible than others: North Wales Water Authority 1)Rain gardens increase the amount of water that filters into the ground and recharges aquifers. 2)They help to protect our community from flooding and drainage problems. 200 W.Walnut St. 3)Rain gardens protect nearby waterways from pollutants such as lawn fertilizers,pesticides,animal waste,oil and trash which North Wales,PA 19454 may have accumulated on lawns and sidewalks. Phone:215-699-4836 4)They enhance the beauty of our yards and neighborhoods. 5)They provide a habitat for birds,butterflies and beneficial insects. 1560 Easton Rd. 6)Rain gardens reduce lawn maintenance-less mowing and fewer fertilizers are needed. Warrington,PA 18976 Things to Consider Before Creating a Rain Garden: Phone:267-482-6940 (This content is provided for informational purposes only and is not comprehensive.You are encouraged to do additional FQ1d us on research.NWWA does not warrant that this Information will meet our needs or ex Facebook y expectations,or that all nonconfom,ltles can or will he corrected.) Site Selection-It's important to take advantage of the topography of your property and take advantage of your property's exiting drainage patterns.If rain doesn't flow to your preferred location,you can use underground piping to divert rain water from your roof or you can create a channel or swale. Your garden should be located downslope and at least 10 feet from the foundation of your house if you have no basement,30 feet if there is a basement.It's also important to stay away from a septic field. Determining Garden Size and Depth-Residential rain gardens are typically 100-square-feet or less in size and 6-8"deep.To determine the depth of your garden,you'll need to perform an infiltration test.To determine the surface area or size,you'll need to measure your drainage area and divide that by your depth measurement. Before You Dig-At least three days before you begin any digging,call Pennsylvania One Call at 8-1-1 or 1-800-242-1776 to mark out the underground utility lines.Making this call will help prevent property damage and potential Injuries. Plant Selection-Choose native plants that are attractive to youl Use native hardy perennial species with well-established root systems that survive in both dry and wet conditions.Click here for a list of native plants suitable for rain gardens.You will find additional native plant lists in the Online Resources section below.Click her for a list of area nurseries that specialize in native plants. Digging and Planting-Dig to the desired depth and use the shoveled out soil to build up a berm at the low end of the garden. Carefully level the base top prevent ponding.Plants should be watered immediately after planting and twice a week(unless it rains) until established.After the first year,the plants will be established and will only need water during hot,dry spells.Check the resources below for more in-depth instructions and information. 9be Nctu fjork9intca IN THE GARDEN The Do-It-Yourself Rain Garden So you spent the holiday weekend indoors,watching rainwater pool in your yard—or worse still,in the basement?Here's how to fix that. By Margaret Roach June 2,2021 When it rains all weekend and you're stuck at home,you have time to notice a lot of things.Like that one spot where water runs off the roof a bit too fast,some of it disobediently making its way into the basement.Or maybe you watched as rainwater rushed down the driveway,straight into a storm drain,or into a depression in the lawn where it always seems to pool after a downpour. A scaled-down version of the storm-water management tactics used in municipal planning can help solve those problems, slowing water flow and increasing infiltration.And if the solution is landscape-focused and involves planting native species,it will also support pollinators and other beneficial insects,promoting overall diversity. Think of it as a do-it-yourself rain garden to the rescue—and then some. At her home near Wilmington,Del.,Carrie Wiles is making a plan to redirect the water that rushes off the roof over her kitchen and dining room,entering the cellar,during the new-normal downpours that follow extended dry spells.Ms.Wiles,a horticulturist and the marketing manager at North Creek Nurseries,in Landenberg,Pa.,is no stranger to the idea of using plants to solve environmental issues. North Creek,whose motto is"where horticulture meets ecology,"is a wholesale producer of what are called plugs or liners, many of them species native to the Eastern United States.These baby plants are sold not just to garden centers but to landscapers,park systems,universities and municipalities.Plants used to restore woodland habitats and create meadows are among the company's specialties,as are those that address water challenges in smarter ways. Donald Pell,a landscape designer,created terraced gardens with cool-and warm-season layers of plants to accommodate large volumes of rainwater and complement a Gladwyne,Pa.,house by Moto Designshop. Karl Miller To solve her problem,Ms.Wiles knows that it won't be enough to extend the lower end of her downspout or to add a longer splash block.She also knows that a stretch of turf grass beyond the downspout won't help much.Compared with properly chosen native plants with far deeper root systems,she said,lawn is a poor substitute where water management is needed. That's one more reason,among many,to reduce your expanse of mowed green. `Put the Water in the Landscape' First,and maybe most important:A rain garden is not a water garden,although the main portion is shaped like a basin or a shallow pond. "It's meant to capture and hold that water for a short,specific amount of time—maybe 12 or 24 hours—as it infiltrates or seeps into the ground,"Ms.Wiles said. In his book"Sustainable Stormwater Management: A Landscape-Driven Approach to Planning and Design,"Thomas W. Liptan,a landscape architect,explained the basic goals of landscape storm-water management,principles that are relevant whether a project is municipal-large or backyard-small. "Put the water in the landscape,"Mr.Liptan writes—meaning not in the basement,or running down the driveway or across the garden in gully-washing fashion,where its path is lined with impervious surfaces like roofs and pavement. You can help water move across the landscape,he suggests,by creating a design that is both functional and attractive.At some sites,that may mean a rectilinear bed; elsewhere,it may be something curvilinear.The garden must also be planned with aftercare in mind,for ease of maintenance. A rain garden in Wayne,Pa.,designed by Jonathan Alderson Landscape Architects,manages water and provides pollinator support with a mix of native plants. Rob Cardillo Rain Garden Basics A rain garden has three basic components. The main feature is a shallow basin,usually about six inches deep,that is large enough to accommodate the runoff you're trying to manage.If you plan to mulch around the perennials or shrubs that will be planted in the basin,excavate to eight or nine inches to allow for that layer(and be sure to use shredded mulch,not chips that will float to the surface). To guide the water from its origin point toward the basin's inlet,and to slow it a bit,Ms.Wiles recommends installing a dry stream bed of stone or coarse gravel. And at the farthest or lowest end from the water source is the garden's third component: a small lip or berm. Where in your home landscape will a rain garden(or more than one)be most effective?Plan to spend the next rainstorm or two outdoors to figure that out,Ms.Wiles advised,watching the water and how it moves naturally—for better or worse—as things are currently configured. "Look primarily at how the water flows away from the roof,and down your downspouts from the house,"she said."Also watch for where it tends to pool." Look again a couple of hours after the storm ends,and then 12 and 24 hours later,to see how quickly it seeps into the ground. Make notes. EXHIBIT 8 SoundView Licensed in Connecticut and New York ENGINEERS * LAND SURVEYORS LLC 239 Glenville Road 203,532. 1300 Suite 300 203.532. 1301 fax Greenwich, CT OG831 sou nd.view(?verizon.net April 14 , 2022 Mark and Ellen Harmon 16 Hillandale Road Village of Rye Brook , NY Ref: 18 Hillandale Road Village of Rye Brook , NY Dear Mr. & Mrs . Harmon, On April 11, 2022 we observed the retention basin located east of recently constructed pool and patio at the above referenced site. The weather was sunny and 52 degrees. Water was flowing overland from the retention basin to the south through the berm onto the Harmon property. The retention basin berm slope on the south side exceeds what is allowable. Based on our preliminary review ,the following comments are provided 1. It appears the bottom of retention basin is set about 6 feet below existing grade. This may be too low in relation to seasonal high groundwater levels. This may be the reason for the water bleeding out of berm on south side. 2. The infiltration trench may be allowing water to be directed to the Harmon side. 3. The Berm near the Harmon side is too steep and too close to Property line. Respectfully Submitted, d l � (/� r OTp�tO Robert S. Zmarzlak P.E. Consulting 9 Civil Structural Site Development Land Surveying ►• r t d,t ].� ;4 cr uj LLJLn F ui LU LU cc t r Tti LL ,_ { l ® -J L ' l N bA U C � N ` Q w ,y T H w dLn LJ fa i., C: \ N i L (� LL m �k t 0 +-j N = 0 O Q Z Q 0 +j O E — Q E•��� �/ � L O v O t�, n w frii: L (u Z Q v > f, N + v LU + V) ch - c 4-j 0 4-+ O c C6 -O L c L C U (U O bA (u V) C v) -0 w c� v O a. J (U v N L 4-1 O :3 bZ �_ V CO)� c 3 $N w � �' 6 .i m N > O 0 c ? -0 4J cr)�' 0 0 '•7 Q � oa W 0 N V :D tA G! v Q Q v .c Z 00 O O v 3 o v m � c N � M O U N C or N w LU V w N m J O00 �O Q M O N a.+ Lu �+ ® o O � y 0 u •� t c 3 c v rn a L N l7 � C fA .Q) a0 a M z 00.E n Ln O h o 41 C° a', g' C: :3z W Q Ln V1 EXHIBIT 9 i 0oo y - lop �•�Y/ r 1 1. 41 z._ �-s•� �.r "� >>' may'•-� �Sr-,i _` ear• I ► _ ..� ._ ;� 7 .,r^� v ^ t ✓ r 1 • 47 i r Ile I r t , I 4r r ��.• 14 i x � r � • �rn S, I y 11 n1 ,� f r � N � e APO r * .r, I : � 1 �s r ' Imo, • so F ram. r• i � m Y 0 f r1. i D •Y. Ilk 10, f t } c %M <' v- •�, \,' f, ol h 'Or 6♦ ' I I. i` t, t lot F 1• 1 e � 1 4 w 4. %fit • f a ti 1 :t Y a" \ t". �_-_�._� � L -ram �- • �'��. �. �-�+ 1 , y' zj rel 11 . K� r r # /► aak, �'. t � r Y 1 e 1 .y 41 iia ' t. ,f , Mark and Ellen Harmon JUN - 6 2�22 16 Hillandale Road Rye Brook, NY 10573 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK BUILDING DEPARTMENT To: Robert I. Goodman, Chairman, and the Planning Board of the Village of Rye Brook Date: June 6, 2022 Subject: Supplemental Letter in Opposition to Application for Approval of an Amended Site Plan— Marks Residence— 18 Hillandale Road (lot 135-28-1-29) We write to update Chairman Goodman and the Planning Board with regard to our continuing opposition to the amendment to the approved site plan for the installation of a swimming pool and fence, pool filter and equipment, plantings, and rain garden submitted by the Markses for 18 Hillandale Road. We will not restate any of the substance of our submissions made to this Board on February 7 and on April 14, 2022 which fully brief our positions and provide supporting photos and documentation from our team of professionals, all of which have been posted for your review, together with our in-person presentations to the Board at the February, March and May 2022 meetings. First, however, we bring to the Board's attention that we have learned that,just prior to Memorial Day, an inspection was requested and conducted of the Marks's pool construction and a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy ("TCO") was issued on the Wednesday following the holiday. They began using their pool again on Memorial Day. The Code-required posting of a guaranty (Letter of Credit "in an amount equal to the...value of the remaining work to be constructed") in order to obtain a TCO was not complied with since, of course, that amount remains entirely unknown at this point pending a final determination by the Planning Board as to what construction will be required. Village Code: Section 250-10 (B): "(3) Residential TCOs may be issued in exceptional circumstances, at the discretion of the Building Inspector, if the following conditions are met: (a) Guaranty. Prior to the issuance of the TCO, the applicant must provide an Irrevocable Letter of Credit, or other form of credit, in a form acceptable to the Village Administrator, or his or her designee, in an amount equal to the final Certificate of Occupancy fee, any adjusted building permit fee and the value of the remaining work to be constructed. The applicant may draw down fees as they become due on this amount for work completed." We are not aware of any "exceptional circumstances" that supported the issuance of this TCO, and we note that, while violation of approved plans is not a reason alone to deny an application for legalization (but see Section 250-12 of the Code for penalties for violating approved plans), it would seem that rewarding such violation by issuing a TCO without any guaranty and while approval of the construction is still pending undermines any motivation for applicants to comply with the decisions of this Board or the Village Code. We leave further investigation into how this could have transpired to the discretion of the Board. We remain mindful that the guiding principle, as articulated again by Chairman Goodman at the May meeting,in a legalization proceeding(such as this one)before this Board is whether the revised plans as submitted would have been approved by the Board if they had constituted an original, de novo application, with notice and an opportunity for objections to be heard, and not whether the unapproved completed construction should be allowed to remain and can now be made more palatable. The determination must be made irrespective of the cost and disruption that the applicant may incur by reason of having deviated from the approved plans. We maintain that the amended plans as submitted, and the construction as it now exists, would not have been approved by this Board as part of an original application, had we been given notice and an opportunity to object. The Applicant has spent most of their time, and a great deal of this Board's time, in attempting to distract from the real issue before you, with drawings, plans, legal letters, neighbor's letters, experts, videos, and discussions about sound blankets, sound bubbles, noise-minimizing sheds, new pumps, additional plantings, and reduction of the fence to the Code-allowed height, but not on whether the variations from approved plans would have been acceptable in an original application. For those reasons,we believe that the following would have been the decisions of this Board in an original application on this site plan after hearing our objections in a public meeting pre-construction: 1) Replace the black aluminum pool fence with a clear fence that meets Code height requirements. This would ensure that our line of sight from our back yard, and from all of our windows on the back of our house, would not be disturbed by a six foot high black metal fence; 2) Move the pool equipment on the same elevation to the other side of the pool, away from our property, which has been acknowledged as entirely feasible with some trenching (and also comply with the Code requirements for sound minimization); and 3) Effectively resolve the "rain garden" issues now (before issuance of a C of O), including the days of standing water (mosquito breeding ground concern), and the flow of underground water onto our property;remove or completely screen from view the gravel pits along both sides of the swamp,which are completely visible from our property and back windows; and remove and resolve the build-up of debris leaning against our fence at the bottom of the hill. We believe that the above represents a fair proposal to reach a decision that would likely have been approved by this Board on a de novo application with an opportunity for us to have been heard before construction. We look forward to discussion with the Board. Thank you for your consideration. Mark and Ellen Harmon Cc: Michael Izzo, Building and Fire Inspector Michal Nowak, Superintendent of Public Works/Village Engineer David Heiser, Board of Trustees Drew Victoria Gamils, Esq., Village Attorney Sarah Brown, Hardesty & Hanover Tara Orlando From: Mark Harmon<harmon.mark53@gmail.com> Sent: Monday,July 11,2022 9:05 AM To: Tara Orlando Subject: Fwd: 18 Hillandale Road Planning Board Application Tara: Please post this to the Planning Board documents for the next 18 Hillandale Road meeting. Mark A. Harmon (914) 589-9610 ---------- Forwarded message--------- From: Mark Harmon<harmon.mark53@gmail.com> Date: Fri,Jul 1, 2022 at 8:39 AM Subject: 18 Hillandale Road Planning Board Application To: Michal Nowak<mnowak@ryebrook.org>, Ellen Harmon<ellentharmon@gmail.com>,<tgerardi@ryebrook.org> Michal: After consultation with our consulting engineer,we have only one comment to the revised plans for the retention basin and work along our property line. They have suggested that a topographic as-built survey be required once the finished grades are completed. Please pass this along as you deem appropriate so that it can be considered when the Planning Board adopts its final resolution on further work requirements. Mark A. Harmon (914) S89-9610 1 p EC-ENE and Ellen Harmon �JUG 1 1 2022 16 Hillandale Road Rye Brook, NY 10573 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK BUILDING DEPARTMENT To: Robert I. Goodman, Chairman, and the Planning Board of the Village of Rye Brook Date: July 11,2022 Subject: Continuing Opposition to Application for Approval of an Amended Site Plan— Marks Residence— 18 Hillandale Road (lot 135-28-1-29) We write with regard to our continuing opposition to the legalization application for the installation of a swimming pool fence,pool filter and equipment, and rain garden submitted by Applicant for 18 Hillandale Road. We refer to our previous submissions made on February 7,April 14, and June 6, 2022, which fully set forth our positions and provide supporting photos and documentation from our team of professionals As this Board has advised, the standard for approval of a legalization application is whether this Board would have approved the proposed changes to the original approved plan had no construction yet been commenced, and had the adjacent neighbors (and anyone else affected) been given proper notice, due process, and an opportunity to be heard. It has been repeatedly noted by several members of the Planning Board,beginning with the very first public discussion of this legalization application, that: (1) proper procedure was knowingly disregarded and our rights to be heard were thereby impaired; (2) the pool equipment, as now conceded by Applicant and his professionals, could have been located in a number of areas on Applicant's approximately 1.5 acre property, other than next to our property line, where it now resides; (3) the fence is not only of an illegal height, and was never submitted to this Board for approval, but it is not even the same fence that was submitted to the Architectural Review Board; and(4)there are material problems with the design and/or functioning of the "rain garden". Over the course of the hearings conducted, Applicant has made a series of incremental adjustments to their original application in the hopes of avoiding having to make major adjustments as we have requested and as, along the way, it seemed clear that the minimal steps being offered were insufficient. It is an understandable human response that this relentless chipping away by Applicant would appear to create a substantial change and substitute for the de novo review to which we are entitled. We would urge the Board to remain mindful that the guiding principle in a legalization proceeding is whether the revised plans as submitted would have been approved by the Board if they had constituted an original, de novo application, with notice and an opportunity for objections to be heard, and not whether the unapproved completed construction should be allowed to remain so long as it can now be made more palatable. The appropriate determination must be made irrespective of the cost, inconvenience, delay and disruption that an applicant may incur by reason of his own decision to deviate from approved plans. We maintain that the plans for legalization as submitted, and the construction as it now exists,would not have been approved by this Board as part of an original application, had we been given an opportunity to voice our objections, which could have easily been accommodated, prior to commencement of construction — there were a number of changes to these plans that could (and we maintain, would) have been decided by this Board that would have avoided many of our current objections. Having an opportunity to be heard now -- post- construction-- should not be mistaken for or confused with the impact and probable result of having been given that opportunity prior to construction. 1 For those reasons,we firmly believe that the following would have been the decisions of this Board in an original application on this site plan after hearing our objections in a public meeting pre-construction, and would urge this Board to decide as follows: 1) Fence/Screening: replace the black aluminum pool fence with a clear fence that meets Code height requirements. This would ensure that our line of sight from our back yard,and from all of our windows on the back of our house, would not be disturbed by a six foot high black metal fence (and also incorporate the screening proposals in#1 below); 2) Pool Equipment: move the pool equipment to the same elevation on the other side of the pool, away from our property, which has been acknowledged by Applicant and his professionals as entirely feasible with some trenching (the flat area where it now resides having been created by them in the first instance), and also comply with the Code requirements for screening and sound minimization; and 3) "Rain Garden": see#3 below. In the event that this Board determines that it will accept the construction as it currently exists,with the incremental proposals to date that have been offered by Applicant, we request the following (as well as all proposed additions set forth in Applicant's revised plans to the date of the July 14 meeting): 1) Fence/Screening: either replace the fence as set forth in#1 above or defer decision on the fence to the Architectural Review Board, and in either event, require (as proposed by the applicant) the planting of 18 four foot Chesapeake Holly hedges on the eastern side of the interior of the pool deck against the fence, 6 ten foot Arborvitae trees along the exterior of the southern side of the pool fence, and 2 additional ten foot Arborvitae trees along our chain link fence to fill in gaps in screening;reduce the height of the pool fence on the eastern side to 34.5 inches; 2) Pool Equipment: require installation of a Jandy variable speed pro-flo pump with a Serene+ noise reduction pool pump equipment cover(as proposed by Applicant), together with sufficient screening plantings around the pool pump equipment cover so that,in the words of one Planning Board member, it is "invisible"; and 3) Rain Garden: effectively resolve the "rain garden" issues now (before issuance of a C of O, when it may be too late as a practical matter for enforcement of compliance, in light of Applicant's lack of compliance to date), including: (a) the constant standing water even after days of no rain, and even given maturing plantings (mosquito breeding ground),which Mr. Utschig stated can be adjusted with a lever that exists to lower the water(Soundview Engineers maintains that the bottom of the retention basin was built too low); (b) resolve the secondary stream of groundwater flowing from Applicant's property onto our property, which groundwater Mr. Utschig proposes to pipe to the brook and put in an underdrain system - Soundview Engineers also advises the additional installation of an impermeable barrier along our property line consisting of a 3 foot deep trench with pond liner and backfill;(c)remove or completely screen from view with adequate plantings the gravel pits along both sides of the swamp, which are visible from our property and back windows; (d) remove and permanently resolve the significant build-up of dirt, silt and debris leaning against our fence at the bottom of the hill; (e) commit to a schedule of regular, adequate maintenance to keep all of the foregoing in proper working order and to rake out debris and remove fallen branches (without which, as per Mr. Nowak, a dam can be created which could impede the flow of the brook); (1) require that upon completion of all additional work by Applicant on the "rain garden", a topographic as-built 2 survey be required once the finished grades are completed(advised by Soundview Engineers); and(g) require that the annual certification form sent to homeowners by the Village be completed by an independent engineer(or agreed to by our engineer) rather than solely by the engineer who designed and installed the"rain garden"for Applicant. We look forward to discussion with the Board. Thank you for your consideration. Mark and Ellen Harmon Cc: Michael Izzo, Building and Fire Inspector Michal Nowak, Superintendent of Public Works/Village Engineer David Heiser, Board of Trustees Drew Victoria Gamils,Esq.,Village Attorney Sarah Brown, Hardesty&Hanover 3 Tara Orlando From: Michal Nowak Sent: Friday,June 24,2022 9:54 AM To: Tara Orlando Subject: FW: 18 Hillandale Road Attachments: SITE-PLAN-MARKS-RAIN GARDENrev6.pdf Can we please include this plan and email for the record and online From: chris stevenscompanies.org<chris@stevenscompanies.org> Sent:Thursday,June 23, 2022 4:57 PM To: info@soundviewengineers.com Cc: Michal Nowak<MNowak@ryebrook.org> Subject: 18 Hillandale Road Robert Good afternoon I have attached our latest design drawing that incorporates both the pond underdrain and the impermeable liner barrier you recommended in your correspondence dated 6/8/22. The Planning Board has asked for me to reach out to confirm your agreement that my design plan satisfactorily addresses your comment. Thankyou Chris Utschig PE 914-391-9550 1 Christopher S. Utschig P.E. 914 391-9550 65 Ralph Ave,White Plains NY 10606 chris@stevenscompanies.org 72022 Village of Rye Brook D ECEMED 938 King Street Public Works and Engineering Michal Nowak JUL 2 5 2022 RE: 18 Hillandale VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK BUILDING DEPARTMENT The following are our responses to the comments of James Natarelli dated 7/22/22 1. The model appears to work with the basin overflow weir at elevation 160.2 and the 1" orifice at elevation 1S8,the plan needs to show the same. Please update the rip-rap overflow label for the 160.2 elevation, and please update the"Underdrain X-Section"sketch for the drill holes at elevation 1S8. I revised the model to show the outlet at 157.2,it needs to be below the pond bottom for intended effect.There is no change to the model results. 2. Thank you for the Tc updates. Please double check DA#3. The model has been adjusted to include a specific Tc for this area, the modification had a slight effect on the model results however there is no increase over pre-dev. 3. Please update the control structure detail on Sheet 2 of 2 to call out a solid cover. (Please also remove the"asphalt wearing course" note from the detail.) I removed the detail,and enhanced the underdrain x-section with necessary information 4. At first I was confused when I saw that the 4"cultec overflow was being shown again but then I saw the note about removing it. Please consider incorporating the note about removing the 4" overflow into the callout in site plan view. Maybe just"to be removed" under the callout?? I removed the overflow pipe from the plan. S. The model has the Swale going directly to the design point, however, the plan appears to show it discharging into the basin. Both discharge locations are fine but they need to be consistent between model and plan. I modified the model,there was no effect on the results The results of the revised analysis are as follows Design Storm Pre Dev(cfs) Post Dev(cfs) 1-YR 1.1 0.4 25-YR 4.4 4.2 100-YR 7.1 7.1 Sincerely, Christopher S. Utschig Existing Suboat Reach Link Routing Diagram for Existing Prepared by{enter your company name here}, Printed 7/22/2022 HydroCAD®10.00-26 sM 09858 0 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Existing Prepared by{enter your company name here} Printed 7/22/2022 HydroCAD®10.00-26 s/n 09858 ®2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pale 2 Area Listing (all nodes) Area CN Description (sq-ft) (subcatchment-numbers) 37,268 74 >75%Grass cover,Good, HSG C (1S) 7,210 98 Paved parking, HSG C (1S) 44,478 78 TOTAL AREA Existing Prepared by{enter your company name here} Printed 7/22/2022 HydroCAD010.00-26 s/n 09858 02020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC PaOe_3 Soil Listing (all nodes) Area Soil Subcatchment (sq-ft) Group Numbers 0 HSG A 0 HSG B 44,478 HSG C 1 S 0 HSG D 0 Other 44,478 TOTAL AREA Existing Prepared by{enter your company name here} Printed 7/22/2022 HydroCAD010.00-26 s/n 09858 02020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pape 4 Ground Covers (all nodes) HSG-A HSG-B HSG-C HSG-D Other Total Ground Sub( (sq-ft) (sq-ft) (sq-ft) (sq-ft) (sq-ft) (sq-ft) Cover Num 0 0 37,268 0 0 37,268 >75%Grass cover, Good 0 0 7,210 0 0 7,210 Paved parking 0 0 44,478 0 0 44,478 TOTAL AREA Existing Type M 24-hr 1 Year Rainfall=2.80" Prepared by{enter your company name here} Printed 7/22/2022 HydroCAD®10.00-26 s/n 09858 ©2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pane 5 Time span=5.00-20.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs,301 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method,UH=SCS,Weighted-CN Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Subcatchment 1 S: Existing Runoff Area=44,478 sf 16.21%Impervious Runoff Depth>0.90" Tc=7.7 min CN=78 Runoff=1.06 cfs 3,352 cf Total Runoff Area=44,478 sf Runoff Volume=3,352 cf Average Runoff Depth=0.90" 83.79% Pervious=37,268 sf 16.21% Impervious=7,210 sf Existing Type/1/ 24-hr 1 Year Rainfall=2.80" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 7/22/2022 HydroCAD®10 00-26 s/n 09858 ©2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 6 Summary for Subcatchment 1S: Existing Runoff = 1.06 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 3,352 cf, Depth> 0.90" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type III 24-hr 1 Year Rainfall=2.80" _ Area (sf) CN Description 37,268 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C _ 7,210 98 Paved parking, HSG C 44,478 78 Weighted Average 37,268 83.79% Pervious Area 7,210 16.21% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 7.7 Direct Entry, Subcatchment 1S: Existing Hydrograph ❑Runoff 1.06 cfs Type III 24-hr 1 Year Rainfall=2.80" Runoff Area=44,478 sf Runoff Volume=3,352 cf Runoff Depth>0.90" Tc=7.7 min CN=78 0 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) Existing Type 111 24-hr 25 Year Rainfall=6.40" Prepared by{enter your company name here} Printed 7/22/2022 HydroCAD810.00-26 s/n 09858 02020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pane 7 Time span=5.00-20.00 hrs,dt=0.05 hrs,301 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS,Weighted-CN Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Subcatchment 1S: Existing Runoff Area=44,478 sf 16.21%Impervious Runoff Depth>3.68" Tc=7.7 min CN=78 Runoff--4.38 cfs 13,649 cf Total Runoff Area=44,478 sf Runoff Volume=13,649 cf Average Runoff Depth =3.68" 83.79°k Pervious=37,268 sf 16.21% Impervious=7,210 sf Existing Type /// 24-hr 25 Year Rainfall=6.40" Prepared by (enter your company name here} Printed 7/22/2022 HydroCAD®10.00-26 sin 09858 ©2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 8 Summary for Subcatchment 1S: Existing Runoff = 4.38 cfs @ 12.11 hrs, Volume= 13,649 cf, Depth> 3.68" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type III 24-hr 25 Year Rainfall=6.40" _ Area (sf) CN Description 37,268 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C 7,210 98 Paved parking, HSG C 44,478 78 Weighted Average 37,268 83.79% Pervious Area 7,210 16.21% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 7.7 Direct Entry, Subcatchment 1S: Existing Hydrograph ❑Runoff 4 38 cfs Type III 24-hr 4 25 Year Rainfall=6.40" Runoff Area=44,478 sf 3 Runoff Volume=13,649 cf Runoff Depth>3.68" Tc=7.7 min LL 2 CN=78 1 0 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) Existing Type I//24-hr 100 Year Rainfall=9.20" Prepared by{enter your company name here} Printed 7/22/2022 HydroCAD810.00-26 s/n 09858 02020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae 9 Time span=5.00-20.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs, 301 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS,Weighted-CN Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Subcatchment 1S: Existing Runoff Area=44,478 sf 16.21%Impervious Runoff Depth>6.13" Tc=7.7 min CN=78 Runoff=7.14 cfs 22,715 cf Total Runoff Area=",478 sf Runoff Volume=22,715 cf Average Runoff Depth =6.13" 83.79% Pervious=37,268 sf 16.21% Impervious=7,210 sf Existing Type H/ 24-hr 100 Year Rainfall=9.20" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 7/22/2022 HydroCAD®10 00-26 s/n 09858 ©2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 10 Summary for Subcatchment 1S: Existing Runoff = 7.14 cfs @ 12.11 hrs, Volume= 22,715 cf, Depth> 6.13" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type III 24-hr 100 Year Rainfall=9.20" Area (so CN Description 37,268 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C 7,210 98 Paved parking, HSG C 44,478 78 Weighted Average 37,268 83.79% Pervious Area 7,210 16.21% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 7.7 Direct Entry, Subcatchment 1S: Existing Hydrograph �❑Runoff 7 14 cfs 7 Type III 24-hr 100 Year Rainfall=9.20" 6 Runoff Area=44,478 sf 5 Runoff Volume=22,715 cf Runoff Depth>6.13" 4- Tc=7.7 min 3 C N=78 0 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) DRAIN ARE #3 DRAIN A EA#2 DRAIN REA#1 2P Cultec Chambers 3P 5L Bio tention Pond 7S 4 Design Point Drainage Area 4 6R Grass Swale Subcat Reg on Link Routing Diagram for Proposed Prepared by{enter your company name here}, Printed 7/25/2022 HydroCAD®10.00-26 sin 09858 0 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Proposed Prepared by{enter your company name here} Printed 7/25/2022 HydroCAD®10.00-26 s/n 09858 02020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pane 2 Area Listing (all nodes) Area CN Description (sq-ft) (subcatchment-numbers) 2,113 74 (1S) 5,458 79 <50%Grass cover, Poor, HSG B (6S) 27,527 74 >75%Grass cover,Good, HSG C (4S,7S) 9,343 98 Paved parking, HSG C (1S,6S) 44,441 80 TOTAL AREA Proposed Prepared by{enter your company name here} Printed 7/25/2022 HydroCAD®10.00-26 s/n 09858 ®2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 3 Soil Listing (all nodes) Area Soil Subcatchment (sq-ft) Group Numbers 0 HSG A 5,458 HSG B 6S 36,870 HSG C 1S,4S,6S, 7S 0 HSG D 2,113 Other is 44,"1 TOTAL AREA Proposed Prepared by(enter your company name here) Printed 7/25/2022 HydroCAD®10.00-26 s/n 09858 02020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pape 4 Ground Covers (all nodes) HSG-A HSG-B HSG-C HSG-D Other Total Ground Sub( (sq-ft) (sq-ft) (sq-ft) (sq-ft) (sq-ft) (sq-ft) Cover Num 0 0 0 0 2,113 2,113 0 5,458 0 0 0 5,458 <50%Grass cover, Poor 0 0 27,527 0 0 27,527 >75%Grass cover, Good 0 0 9,343 0 0 9,343 Paved parking 0 5,458 36,870 0 2,113 44,441 TOTAL AREA Proposed Prepared by{enter your company name here} Printed 7/25/2022 HydroCAD®10.00-26 s/n 09858 ®2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page_5 Pipe Listing (all nodes) Line# Node In-Invert Out-Invert Length Slope n Diam/Width Height Inside-Fill Number (feet) (feet) (feet) (ft/ft) (inches) (inches) (inches) 1 is 0.00 0.00 75.0 0.0100 0.010 4.0 0.0 0.0 2 6S 0.00 0.00 120.0 0.1580 0.010 4.0 0.0 0.0 Proposed Type ///24-hr 1 Year Rainfall=2.80" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 7/25/2022 HydroCAD910.00-26 s/n 09858 02020 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 6 Time span=5.00-20.00 hrs,dt=0.05 hrs,301 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS,Weighted-CN Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Subcatchment 1S: DRAIN AREA#3 Runoff Area=5,663 sf 62.69%Impervious Runoff Depth>1.61" Flow Length=125' Tc=5.9 min CN=89 Runoff=0.26 cfs 760 cf Subcatchment 4S: DRAIN AREA#1 Runoff Area=20,414 sf 0.00%Impervious Runoff Depth>0.71" Flow Length=335' Tc=7.7 min CN=74 Runoff=0.37 cfs 1,207 cf Subcatchment6S: DRAIN AREA#2 Runoff Area=11,251 sf 51.49%Impervious Runoff Depth>1.61" Flow Length=250' Tc=5.9 min CN=89 Runoff=0.51 cfs 1,510 cf Su bcatchment 7S: Drainage Area 4 Runoff Area=7,113 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth>0.71" Flow Length=160' Slope=0.0750'f Tc=8.2 min CN=74 Runoff=0.12 cfs 421 cf Reach 6R: Grass Swale Avg. Flow Depth=0.06' Max Vet=0.67 fps Inflow=0.02 cfs 206 cf n=0.150 L=25.0' S=0.3200'1 Capacity--4.83 cfs Outflow=0.02 cfs 206 cf Pond 2P: Cultec Chambers Peak Elev=168.01' Storage=555 cf Inflow=0.26 cfs 760 d Outflow=0.02 cfs 206 d Pond 3P: Bio Retention Pond Peak Elev=159AT Storage=1,144 d Inflow=0.63 ds 2,136 d Outflow=0.04 ds 1,189 d Link 5L: Design Point Inflow=0.39 cfs 2,396 d Primary=0.39 cfs 2,396 d Total Runoff Area=44,441 sf Runoff Volume=3,898 cf Average Runoff Depth =1.05" 78.98% Pervious=36,098 sf 21.02% Impervious=9,343 sf Proposed Type/1/ 24-hr 1 Year Rainfall=2.80" Prepared by {enter your company name here) Printed 7/25/2022 HydroCAD®10.00-26 s/n 09858 ©2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 7 Summary for Subcatchment 1S: DRAIN AREA #3 Runoff = 0.26 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 760 cf, Depth> 1.61" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type III 24-hr 1 Year Rainfall=2.80" Area (so CN Description 3,550 98 Paved parking, HSG C 2,113 74 5,663 89 Weighted Average 2,113 37.31% Pervious Area 3,550 62.69% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.5 50 0.0200 0.15 Sheet Flow, Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.40" 0.4 75 0.0100 2.84 0.25 Pipe Channel, 4.0" Round Area= 0.1 sf Perim= 1.0' r= 0.08' n= 0.010 PVC, smooth interior 5.9 125 Total Subcatchment 1S: DRAIN AREA #3 Hydrograph 0.28 O Runoft 0.26 cfs 0.26 0.24 Type III 24-h r 0.22 1 Year Rainfall=2.80" 02 Runoff Area=5,663 sf 4 0.16- Runoff Volume=760 cf 0.14- Runoff Depth>1 .61" " 012 Flow Length=125' 0.1 Tc=5.9 m i n 0.08 006 CN=89 0 04 002 0 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) Proposed Type/1/ 24-hr 1 Year Rainfall=2.80" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 7/25/2022 HydroCAD® 10.00-26 s/n 09858 ©2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 8 Summary for Subcatchment 4S: DRAIN AREA #1 Runoff = 0.37 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 1,207 cf, Depth> 0.71" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type III 24-hr 1 Year Rainfall=2.80" Area (st CN Description 20,414 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C 20,414 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 7.1 185 0.1400 0.43 Sheet Flow, Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.40" 0.6 150 0.0600 4.11 24.63 Channel Flow, Area= 6.0 sf Perim= 7.0' r= 0.86' n= 0.080 Earth, long dense weeds 7.7 335 Total Subcatchment 4S: DRAIN AREA #1 Hydrograph 04 ❑Runoff 038 FO 37 cfs 036 Type III 24-h r 0 34 .32 1 Year Rainfall=2.80" 0.3 028 Runoff Area=20,414 sf 0.26 Runoff Volume=1 207 cf 0.24 022 Runoff Depth>0.71" ° 0 18 Flow Length=335' ,0 0.16 014 Tc=7.7 m i n 012 CN=74 0.1 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 0 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) Proposed Type/1/ 24-hr 1 Year Rainfall=2.80" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 7/25/2022 HydroCAD®10.00-26 s/n 09858 02020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 9 Summary for Subcatchment 6S: DRAIN AREA #2 Runoff = 0.51 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 1,510 cf, Depth> 1.61" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type III 24-hr 1 Year Rainfall=2.80" Area (so CN Description 5,793 98 Paved parking, HSG C 5,458 79 <50% Grass cover, Poor, HSG B 11,251 89 Weighted Average 5,458 48.51% Pervious Area 5,793 51.49% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.5 100 0.0800 0.31 Sheet Flow, Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.40" 0.2 30 0.0100 2.03 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Paved Kv= 20.3 fps 0.2 120 0.1580 11.27 0.98 Pipe Channel, 4.0" Round Area=0.1 sf Perim= 1.0' r= 0.08' n= 0.010 PVC, smooth interior 5.9 250 Total Subcatchment 6S: DRAIN AREA #2 Hydrograph 0.55 ❑Runoff 0.81 cfs 0.5 Type III 24-hr 0.45 1 Year Rainfall=2.80" 0.4 Runoff Area=11,251 sf 0.35 Runoff Volume=1,510 cf 0.3 Runoff Depth>1.61" 0.25- Flow Length=250' 0.2- Tc=5.9 min CN=89 0., 0.05 0 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) Proposed Type/1/ 24-hr 1 Year Rainfall=2.80" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 7/25/2022 HydroCAD® 10 00-26 s/n 09858 ©2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 10 Summary for Subcatchment 7S: Drainage Area 4 Runoff = 0.12 cfs @ 12.13 hrs, Volume= 421 cf, Depth> 0.71" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type III 24-hr 1 Year Rainfall=2.80" Area (so CN Description 7,113 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C 7,113 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (fUft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 8.2 160 0.0750 0.33 Sheet Flow, Grass.- Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.40" Subcatchment 7S: Drainage Area 4 Hydrograph ❑Runoff 0.13 0.12 cfs 0.12- Type III 24-hr 0.11- 1 Year Rainfall=2.80" 01 Runoff Area=7,113 sf 009 Runoff Volume=421 d 008 Runoff Depth>0.71" 3 out- 0Flow Length=160' 0.06- 0.05 Slope=0.0750 '1' 004- Tc=8.2 min C N=74 0.02 0.01 0 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) Proposed Type/1/ 24-hr 1 Year Rainfall=2.80" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 7/25/2022 HydroCADO 10 00-26 s/n 09858 ©2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 11 Summary for Reach 6R: Grass Swale Inflow = 0.02 cfs @ 13.55 hrs, Volume= 206 cf Outflow = 0.02 cfs @ 13.56 hrs, Volume= 206 cf, Atten= 9%, Lag= 0.9 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Max. Velocity= 0.67 fps, Min. Travel Time=0.6 min Avg. Velocity= 0.48 fps, Avg. Travel Time= 0.9 min Peak Storage= 1 cf @ 13.56 hrs Average Depth at Peak Storage= 0.06' Bank-Full Depth= 0.75' Flow Area= 1.5 sf, Capacity=4.83 cfs 3.00' x 0.75' deep Parabolic Channel, n= 0.150 Sheet flow over Short Grass Length= 25.0' Slope= 0.32007 Inlet Invert= 168.00', Outlet Invert= 160.00' Reach 6R: Grass Swale Hydrograph ❑Inflow 0.02 cfs ❑outflow 0.026 Avg. Flow Depth=0.06' 0.024 0.02 cfs 0022 Max Vet=0.67 fps 0.02 n=0.150 0.018 L=25.0' 0.016 0.014 S=0.3200 '/' 3 0.012- Capacity=4.83 cfs 0.01 0 008 0.0os- 0.004 0.002- 0 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) Proposed Type /// 24-hr 1 Year Rainfall=2.80" Prepared by (enter your company name here) Printed 7/25/2022 HydroCADO 10.00-26 s/n 09858 ©2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 12 Summary for Pond 2P: Cultec Chambers Inflow Area = 5,663 sf, 62.69% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 1.61" for 1 Year event Inflow = 0.26 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 760 cf Outflow = 0.02 cfs @ 13.55 hrs, Volume= 206 cf, Atten=90%, Lag= 87.6 min Secondary= 0.02 cfs @ 13.55 hrs, Volume= 206 cf Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs/3 Peak Elev= 168.01' @ 13.55 hrs Surf.Area= 392 sf Storage= 555 cf Plug-Flow detention time=275.4 min calculated for 206 cf(27% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 170.1 min (952.7- 782.6) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 162.00' 555 cf 16.00'W x 24.50'L x 3.54'H Field A 1,388 cf Overall x 40.0%Voids Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Secondary 168.00' 12.0" x 12.0" Horiz. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads Secondary OutFlow Max=0.01 cfs @ 13.55 hrs HW=168.01' (Free Discharge) Z1=Orifice/Grate (Weir Controls 0.01 cfs @ 0.29 fps) Pond 2P: Cultec Chambers Hydrograph G Inflow 0.28 026 cfs 1.0 Secondary 0.26 Inflow Area=5,663 sf 0.24 Peak Elev=168.01 ' 0.22 0.2 Storage=555 cf 0.18 �^ 0.16 0.14 _o 0.12 0.1 0.08 0.06 0.04 0 02 0.02 0 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) Proposed Type Ill 24-hr 1 Year Rainfall=2.80" Prepared by (enter your company name here) Printed 7/25/2022 HydroCAD®10.00-26 s/n 09858 0 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 13 Summary for Pond 3P: Bio Retention Pond Inflow Area= 24,027 sf, 38.89% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 1.07" for 1 Year event Inflow = 0.63 cis @ 12.10 hrs, Volume= 2,136 cf Outflow = 0.04 cis @ 15.74 hrs, Volume= 1,189 cf, Atten=94%, Lag=218.8 min Primary = 0.04 cis @ 15.74 hrs, Volume= 1,189 cf Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span=5.00-20.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs/3 Peak Elev= 159.17'@ 15.74 hrs Surf.Area=912 sf Storage= 1,144 cf Plug-Flow detention time=202.5 min calculated for 1,185 cf(55%of inflow) Center-of-Mass det.time= 110.5 min (918.2-807.7) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 158.00, 2,833 cf Custom Stage Data(Prismatic)Listed below Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 158.00 639 0 0 160.90 1,315 2,833 2,833 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 157.20' 1.0"Vert Orifice/Grate C=0.600 #2 Primary 160.20' 4.0'long x 3.0' breadth Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 Coef. (English) 2.44 2.58 2.68 2.67 2.65 2.64 2.64 2.68 2.68 2.72 2.81 2.92 2.97 3.07 3.32 Primary OutFlow Max=0.04 cfs @ 15.74 hrs HW=159.17' (Free Discharge) 1=Orifice/Grate (Orifice Controls 0.04 cis @ 6.69 fps) 12=Broad-C rested Rectangular Weir (Controls 0.00 cis) Proposed Type 111 24-hr 1 Year Rainfall=2.80" Prepared by {enter your company name here) Printed 7/25/2022 HydroCAD®10 00-26 s/n 09858 ©2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 14 Pond 3P: Bio Retention Pond Hydrograph Inflow 0.7 0 63 cts 1 ❑Primary 0.65 Inflow Area=24,027 sf 0.6 0.55 Peak Elev=159.17' j 0.5 �; Storage=1 ,144 cf li 0.45 t' _ I 0.4 V , I 0.35 o /I� 0.3 0.25 '11 1, 0.2 a 0.15 0.1 0.05 i s- -^ 0.04 cls 0 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) Proposed Type /// 24-hr 1 Year Rainfall=2.80" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 7/25/2022 HydroCAD®10 00-26 s/n 09858 ©2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 15 Summary for Link 5L: Design Point Inflow Area = 44,441 sf, 21.02% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 0.65" for 1 Year event Inflow = 0.39 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 2,396 cf Primary = 0.39 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 2,396 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary outflow= Inflow, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Link 5L: Design Point Hydrograph ❑Inflow 0.44 0 39 cfs ❑Primary 04 ~3CIS 0.4 Inflow Area=44,441 sf 0.38 0.36 0.34 0.32 f 0.3 0.28 0.26 i I N � 0.24 3 0.22 0 0.2- a. 0.18- 0.16 0.12- 0.1 0.08 �.. 0.06 0.04 X. 0-02 0 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) Proposed Type H/24-hr 25 Year Rainfall=6.40" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 7/25/2022 HydroCAD®10.00-26 s/n 09858 02020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pace 16 Time span=5.00-20.00 hrs,dt=0.05 hrs,301 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS,Weighted-CN Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Subcatchment 1S: DRAIN AREA#3 Runoff Area=5,663 sf 62.69%Impervious Runoff Depth>4.84" Flow Length=125' Tc=5.9 min CN=89 Runoff-0.73 cfs 2,285 cf Subcatchment 4S: DRAIN AREA#1 Runoff Area=20,414 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth>3.28" Flow Length=335' Tc=7.7 min CN=74 Runoff=1.80 cfs 5,586 cf Subcatchment SS: DRAIN AREA#2 Runoff Area=11,251 sf 51.49%Impervious Runoff Depth>4.84" Flow Length=250' Tc=5.9 min CN=89 Runoff=1.45 cfs 4,540 cf Subcatchment 7S: Drainage Area 4 Runoff Area=7,113 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth>3.28" Flow Length=160' Slope=0.0750'f Tc=8.2 min CN=74 Runoff=0.62 cfs 1,946 cf Reach 6R: Grass Swale Avg. Flow Depth=0.30' Max Vet=1.85 fps Inflow=0.78 cfs 1,739 cf n=0.150 L=25.0' S=0.3200'f Capacity=4.83 cfs Outflow=0.71 cfs 1,740 cf Pond 2P: Cultec Chambers Peak Elev=168.15' Storage=555 cf Inflow=0.73 cfs 2,285 cf Outflow=0.78 cfs 1,739 cf Pond 3P: Bio Retention Pond Peak Elev=160.5T Storage=2,511 cf Inflow=2.76 cfs 8,226 cf Outflow=2.35 cfs 6,084 cf Link 5L: Design Point Inflow=3.99 cfs 11,669 cf Primary=3.99 cfs 11,669 cf Total Runoff Area=44,441 sf Runoff Volume=14,357 cf Average Runoff Depth =3.88" 78.98% Pervious=36,098 sf 21.02% Impervious=9,343 sf Proposed Type /// 24-hr 25 Year Rainfall=6.40" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 7/25/2022 HydroCADO 10.00-26 s/n 09858 ©2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 17 Summary for Subcatchment 1S: DRAIN AREA #3 Runoff = 0.73 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 2,285 cf, Depth> 4.84" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type III 24-hr 25 Year Rainfall=6.40" Area (so CN Description 3,550 98 Paved parking, HSG C 2,113 74 5,663 89 Weighted Average 2,113 37.31% Pervious Area 3,550 62.69% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.5 50 0.0200 0.15 Sheet Flow, Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.40" 0.4 75 0.0100 2.84 0.25 Pipe Channel, 4.0" Round Area= 0.1 sf Perim= 1.0' r= 0.08' n= 0.010 PVC, smooth interior 5.9 125 Total Subcatchment 1S: DRAIN AREA #3 Hydrograph 08 ❑Runoff 0.75 073 cfs 0.7 Type III 24-hr 065 25 Year Rainfall=6.40" 06 Runoff Area=5,663 sf 0.55 0.5- Runoff Volume=2,285 cf 0.45 Runoff Depth>4.84" 04 U- 0 35 Flow Length=125' 03 Tc=5.9 min 025 CN=89 02 01s 01 0.05 0 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 fl a (hours) Proposed Type /// 24-hr 25 Year Rainfall=6.40" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 7/25/2022 HydroCADO 10.00-26 s/n 09858 ©2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 18 Summary for Subcatchment 4S: DRAIN AREA #1 Runoff = 1.80 cfs @ 12.11 hrs, Volume= 5,586 cf, Depth> 3.28" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type III 24-hr 25 Year Rainfall=6.40" Area (so CN Description 20,414 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C 20,414 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (fUft) (fUsec) (cfs) 7.1 185 0.1400 0.43 Sheet Flow, Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.40" 0.6 150 0.0600 4.11 24.63 Channel Flow, Area= 6.0 sf Perim= 7.0' r—0.86' n= 0.080 Earth, long dense weeds 7.7 335 Total Subcatchment 4S: DRAIN AREA #1 Hydrograph 2 O Runoff 1.80 cfs Type III 24-hr 25 Year Rainfall=6.40" Runoff Area=20,414 sf Runoff Volume=5,586 cf Runoff Depth>3.28" U- 1 Flow Length=335' Tc=7.7 min CN=74 0 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) Proposed Type 111 24-hr 25 Year Rainfall=6.40" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 7/25/2022 HydroCAD® 10.00-26 s/n 09858 ©2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 19 Summary for Subcatchment 6S: DRAIN AREA #2 Runoff = 1.45 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 4,540 cf, Depth> 4.84" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type III 24-hr 25 Year Rainfall=6.40" Area (sf) CN Description 5,793 98 Paved parking, HSG C 5,458 79 <50% Grass cover, Poor, HSG B 11,251 89 Weighted Average 5,458 48.51% Pervious Area 5,793 51.49% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (fUsec) (cfs) 5.5 100 0.0800 0.31 Sheet Flow, Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.40" 0.2 30 0.0100 2.03 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Paved Kv= 20.3 fps 0.2 120 0,1580 11.27 0.98 Pipe Channel, 4.0" Round Area= 0.1 sf Perim= 1.0' r= 0.08' n=0.010 PVC, smooth interior 5.9 250 Total Subcatchment 6S: DRAIN AREA #2 Hydrograph ❑Runoff t 45cfs Type III 24-hr 25 Year Rainfall=6.40" Runoff Area=11,251 sf 1 Runoff Volume=4,540 cf Runoff Depth>4.84" U. Flow Length=250' Tc=5.9 min CN=89 0 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) Proposed Type /Il 24-hr 25 Year Rainfall=6.40" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 7/25/2022 HydroCAD®10.00-26 s/n 09858 ©2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 20 Summary for Subcatchment 7S: Drainage Area 4 Runoff = 0.62 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 1,946 cf, Depth> 3.28" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type III 24-hr 25 Year Rainfall=6.40" Area (so CN Description 7,113 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C 7,113 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 8.2 160 0.0750 0.33 Sheet Flow, Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.40" Subcatchment 7S: Drainage Area 4 Hydrograph 065 ❑RunoH 0.62 cls 0.6 Type III 24-hr 0.55 25 Year Rainfall=6.40" 05 Runoff Area=7,113 sf 045 Runoff Volume=1,946 cf 04 0.35 Runoff Depth>3.28" Flow Length=160' U. 03 0.25 Slope=0.0750 '/' 02 Tc=8.2 min 0.15 CN=74 a1 0.05 0 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) Proposed Type Ill 24-hr 25 Year Rainfall=6.40" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 7/25/2022 HydroCAD®10 00-26 s/n 09858 @ 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 21 Summary for Reach 6R: Grass Swale Inflow = 0.78 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 1,739 cf Outflow = 0.71 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 1,740 cf, Atten= 9%, Lag= 1.5 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Max. Velocity= 1.85 fps, Min. Travel Time= 0.2 min Avg. Velocity= 0.75 fps, Avg. Travel Time= 0.6 min Peak Storage= 10 cf @ 12.08 hrs Average Depth at Peak Storage= 0.30' Bank-Full Depth= 0.75' Flow Area= 1.5 sf, Capacity= 4.83 cfs 3.00' x 0.75' deep Parabolic Channel, n= 0.150 Sheet flow over Short Grass Length= 25.0' Slope= 0.32007 Inlet Invert= 168.00', Outlet Invert= 160.00' Reach 6R: Grass Swale Hydrograph ❑Inflow 0.85 i_0_78 cfs i ❑Outflow 0.8 ` ' Avg. Flow Depth=0.30' OJS °"cfs 0.7 Max Vet=1.85 fps � 065 n=0.150 0.6 0.55 L=25.0' j 0.5 045 S=0.3200 T LL 035 Capacity=4.83 cfs 03 / 025 0.2 0 15 0 1 005 0 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) Proposed Type /// 24-hr 25 Year Rainfall=6.40" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 7/25/2022 HydroCAD0 10.00-26 s/n 09858 ©2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 22 Summary for Pond 2P: Cultec Chambers Inflow Area = 5,663 sf, 62.69% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 4.84" for 25 Year event Inflow = 0.73 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 2,285 cf Outflow = 0.78 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 1,739 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Secondary= 0.78 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 1,739 cf Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs/3 Peak Elev= 168.15' @ 12.06 hrs Surf.Area= 392 sf Storage= 555 cf Plug-Flow detention time=104.0 min calculated for 1,739 cf(76%of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time=44.7 min (801.8- 757.1 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 162.00' 555 cf 16.00'W x 24.501 x 3.54'H Field A 1,388 cf Overall x 40.0% Voids Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Secondary 168.00' 12.0" x 12.0" Horiz. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads Secondary OutFlow Max=0.72 cfs @ 12.06 hrs HW=168.14' (Free Discharge) L1=Orifice/Grate (Weir Controls 0.72 cfs @ 1.24 fps) Pond 2P: Cultec Chambers Hydrograph ❑Inflow 0.85 i_7 Secondary 0.8 -°�8�15,S Inflow Area=5,663 sf 0.75- 0.7 Peak Elev=168.15' 6 0. 65 - ' Storage=555 cf 0-6 j 0.55 0.5 0.45 0 0.4= LL 0.35= 0.3- 0.25- 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.05 0 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) Proposed Type 111 24-hr 25 Year Rainfall=6.40" Prepared by(enter your company name here) Printed 7/25/2022 HydroCAD®10.00-26 s/n 09858 02020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae 23 Summary for Pond 3P: Bio Retention Pond Inflow Area= 24,027 sf, 38.89%Impervious, Inflow Depth > 4.11" for 25 Year event Inflow = 2.76 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 8,226 cf Outflow = 2.35 cfs @ 12.16 hrs, Volume= 6,084 cf, Atten= 15%, Lag=4.0 min Primary = 2.35 cfs @ 12.16 hrs, Volume= 6,084 cf Routing by Stor-Ind method,Time Span=5.00-20.00 hrs,dt=0.05 hrs/3 Peak Elev= 160.57'@ 12.16 hrs Surf.Area= 1,238 sf Storage=2,511 cf Plug-Flow detention time=95.7 min calculated for 6,083 cf(74%of inflow) Center-of-Mass det.time=33.5 min (808.5-775.0) Volume Invert Avall.Storege Storage Description #1 158.00, 2,833 cf Custom Stage Data(Prismatic)Listed below Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic-feet) 158.00 639 0 0 160.90 1,315 2,833 2,833 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 157.20' 1.0"Vert. Orifice/Grate C=0.600 #2 Primary 160.20' 4.0' long x 3.0' breadth Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 Coef. (English) 2.44 2.58 2.68 2.67 2.65 2.64 2.64 2.68 2.68 2.72 2.81 2.92 2.97 3.07 3.32 Primary OutFlow Max=2.25 cis @ 12.16 hrs HW=160.56' (Free Discharge) 11=Orifice/Grate (Orifice Controls 0.05 cis(d 8.77 fps) 2=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir (Weir Controls 2.20 cfs @ 1.53 fps) Proposed Type 111 24-hr 25 Year Rainfall=6.40" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 7/25/2022 HydroCAD®10 00-26 s/n 09858 ©2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 24 Pond 3P: Bio Retention Pond Hydrograph 11DInflow 2.76 cfs ❑Primary �'. Inflow Area=24,027 sf 2.35cis '. Peak Elev=160.57' Storage=2,511 cf 2 N U 3 O LL 1 0 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) Proposed Type /// 24-hr 25 Year Rainfall=6.40" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 7/25/2022 HydroCADO 10.00-26 s/n 09858 ©2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 25 Summary for Link 5L: Design Point Inflow Area = 44,441 sf, 21.02% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 3.15" for 25 Year event Inflow = 3.99 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 11,669 cf Primary = 3.99 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 11,669 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary outflow= Inflow, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Link 5L: Design Point Hydrograph Inflow 3 99 cfs D Primary 399cfs -4 Inflow Area=44,441 sf 3 `u 3 0 2 1 0 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) Proposed Type/1/24-hr 100 Year Rainfall=9.20" Prepared by{enter your company name here} Printed 7/25/2022 HydroCAD®10.00-26 s/n 09858 02020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 26 Time span=5.00-20.00 hrs,dt=0.05 hrs, 301 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS,Weighted-CN Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Subcatchment 1 S: DRAIN AREA#3 Runoff Area=5,663 sf 62.69%Impervious Runoff Depth>7.42" Flow Length=125' Tc=5.9 min CN=89 Runoff=1.10 cfs 3,504 cf Subcatchment 4S: DRAIN AREA#1 Runoff Area=20,414 sf 0.00%Impervious Runoff Depth>5.64" Flow Length=335' Tc=7.7 min CN=74 Runoff=3.06 cfs 9,596 cf Subcatchment 6S: DRAIN AREA#2 Runoff Area=11,251 sf 51.49%Impervious Runoff Depth>7.42" Flow Length=250' Tc=5.9 min CN=89 Runoff=2.18 cfs 6,961 cf Subcatchment 7S: Drainage Area 4 Runoff Area=7,113 sf 0.00%Impervious Runoff Depth>5.64" Flow Length=160' Slope=0.0750'f Tc=8.2 min CN=74 Runoff=1.05 cfs 3,343 cf Reach 6R: Grass Swale Avg. Flow Depth=0.3T Max Vet=2.10 fps Inflow=1.14 cfs 2,958 cf n=0.150 L=25.0' S=0.3200'f Capacity=4.83 cfs Outflow=1.09 cfs 2,956 cf Pond 2P: Cultec Chambers Peak Elev=168.20' Storage=555 cf Inflow=1.10 cfs 3,504 cf Outflow=1.14 cfs 2,958 cf Pond 3P: Bio Retention Pond Peak Elev=160.73' Storage=2,662 cf Inflow=4.28 cfs 13,260 cf Outflow--4.07 cfs 11,098 cf Link 5L: Design Point Inflow=7.12 cfs 20,694 cf Primary=7.12 cfs 20,694 cf Total Runoff Area=",441 sf Runoff Volume=23,403 cf Average Runoff Depth=6.32" 78.98% Pervious=35,098 sf 21.02% Impervious=9,343 sf Proposed Type 1// 24-hr 100 Year Rainfall=9.20" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 7/25/2022 HydroCAD®10.00-26 s/n 09858 ©2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pape 27 Summary for Subcatchment 1S: DRAIN AREA#3 Runoff = 1.10 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 3,504 cf, Depth> 7.42" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type III 24-hr 100 Year Rainfall=9.20" Area (sf) CN Description 3,550 98 Paved parking, HSG C 2,113 74 5,663 89 Weighted Average 2,113 37.31% Pervious Area 3,550 62.69% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (f/sec) (cfs) 5.5 50 0.0200 0.15 Sheet Flow, Grass.- Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.40" 0.4 75 0.0100 2.84 0.25 Pipe Channel, 4.0" Round Area= 0.1 sf Perim= 1.0' r= 0.08' n= 0.010 PVC, smooth interior 5.9 125 Total Subcatchment 1S: DRAIN AREA #3 Hydrograph ❑Runoff 1.10 cfs Type III 24-hr 1 100 Year Rainfall=9.20" Runoff Area=5,663 sf Runoff Volume=3,504 cf Runoff Depth>7.42" U. Flow Length=125' Tc=5.9 min CN=89 0 5 3 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) Proposed Type/1/ 24-hr 100 Year Rainfall=9.20" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 7/25/2022 HydroCAD0 10.00-26 s/n 09858 02020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 28 Summary for Subcatchment 4S: DRAIN AREA #1 Runoff = 3.06 cfs @ 12.11 hrs, Volume= 9,596 cf, Depth> 5.64" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type III 24-hr 100 Year Rainfall=9.20" Area (so CN Description 20,414 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C 20,414 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 7.1 185 0.1400 0.43 Sheet Flow, Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.40" 0.6 150 0.0600 4.11 24.63 Channel Flow, Area=6.0 sf Perim= 7.0' r- 0.86' n= 0.080 Earth, long dense weeds 7.7 335 Total Subcatchment 4S: DRAIN AREA #1 Hydrograph ❑Runoff 3.06 cfs 3 Type III 24-hr 100 Year Rainfall=9.20" Runoff Area=20,414 sf 2 Runoff Volume=9,596 cf Runoff Depth>5.64" LL Flow Length=335' Tc=7.7 min 1 CN=74 0 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 16 19 20 Time (hours) Proposed Type 111 24-hr 100 Year Rainfall=9.20" Prepared by {enter your company name here) Printed 7/25/2022 HydroCAD®10.00-26 s/n 09858 ©2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pape 29 Summary for Subcatchment 6S: DRAIN AREA #2 Runoff = 2.18 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 6,961 cf, Depth> 7.42" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type III 24-hr 100 Year Rainfall=9.20" Area (so CN Description 5,793 98 Paved parking, HSG C 5,458 79 <50% Grass cover, Poor, HSG B 11,251 89 Weighted Average 5,458 48.51% Pervious Area 5,793 51.49% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.5 100 0.0800 0.31 Sheet Flow, Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.40" 0.2 30 0.0100 2.03 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Paved Kv= 20.3 fps 0.2 120 0.1580 11.27 0.98 Pipe Channel, 4.0" Round Area= 0.1 sf Perim= 1.0' r= 0.08' n= 0.010 PVC, smooth interior 5.9 250 Total Subcatchment 6S: DRAIN AREA #2 Hydrograph ❑Runoff 2 18 cfs Type III 24-hr 2 100 Year Rainfall=9.20" Runoff Area=11,251 sf Runoff Volume=6,961 cf Runoff Depth>7.42" Flow Length=250' Tc=5.9 min CN=89 0 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) Proposed Type Ill 24-hr 100 Year Rainfall=9.20" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 7/25/2022 HydroCAD®10.00-26 s/n 09858 ©2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 30 Summary for Subcatchment 7S: Drainage Area 4 Runoff = 1.05 cfs @ 12.12 hrs, Volume= 3,343 cf, Depth> 5.64" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type III 24-hr 100 Year Rainfall=9.20" Area (so CN Description 7,113 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C 7,113 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 8.2 160 0.0750 0.33 Sheet Flow, Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 3.40" Subcatchment 7S: Drainage Area 4 Hydrograph ❑Runoff 1.05 cfs Type III 24-hr 100 Year Rainfall=9.20" Runoff Area=7,113 sf Runoff Volume=3,343 cf Runoff Depth>5.64" Flow Length=160' Slope=0.0750 'I' Tc=8.2 m i n CN=74 0 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) Proposed Type /ll 24-hr 100 Year Rainfall=9.20" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 7/25/2022 HydroCADO 10.00-26 s/n 09858 ©2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pape 31 Summary for Reach 6R: Grass Swale Inflow = 1.14 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 2,958 cf Outflow = 1.09 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 2,956 cf, Atten= 5%, Lag=0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Max. Velocity= 2.10 fps, Min. Travel Time= 0.2 min Avg. Velocity = 0.86 fps, Avg. Travel Time= 0.5 min Peak Storage= 13 cf @ 12.09 hrs Average Depth at Peak Storage= 0.37' Bank-Full Depth=0.75' Flow Area= 1.5 sf, Capacity=4.83 cfs 3.00' x 0.75' deep Parabolic Channel, n= 0.150 Sheet flow over Short Grass Length= 25.0' Slope= 0.3200 Y Inlet Invert= 168.00', Outlet Invert= 160.00' Reach 6R: Grass Swale Hydrograph Inflow 1 14 cis ❑Outflow 7 09cfs" Avg. Flow Depth=0.37' Max Vet=2.10 fps n=0.150 L=25.0' U S=0.3200 T f Capacity=4.83 cfs 0 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) Proposed Type 111 24-hr 100 Year Rainfall=9.20" Prepared by {enter your company name here) Printed 7/25/2022 HydroCADO 10.00-26 s/n 09858 ©2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 32 Summary for Pond 2P: Cultec Chambers Inflow Area = 5,663 sf, 62.69% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 7.42" for 100 Year event Inflow = 1.10 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 3,504 cf Outflow = 1.14 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 2,958 cf, Atten=0%, Lag= 0.3 min Secondary= 1.14 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 2,958 cf Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs /3 Peak Elev= 168.20'@ 12.09 hrs Surf.Area= 392 sf Storage= 555 cf Plug-Flow detention time=83.6 min calculated for 2,958 cf(84% of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time= 37.6 min (786.7 - 749.1 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 162.00' 555 cf 16.00'W x 24.501 x 3.54'H Field A 1,388 cf Overall x 40.0%Voids Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Secondary 168.00' 12.0" x 12.0" Horiz. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads Secondary OutFlow Max=1.10 cfs @ 12.09 hrs HW=168.19' (Free Discharge) L1=Orifice/Grate (Weir Controls 1.10 cfs @ 1.43 fps) Pond 2P: Cultec Chambers Hydrograph C Inflow ❑secondary 114cfs `s Inflow Area=5,663 sf Peak Elev=168.20' i Storage=555 cf LL -� 0 / 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) Proposed Type 111 24-hr 100 Year Rainfall=9.20" Prepared by{enter your company name here} Printed 7/25/2022 HydroCAD810.00-26 s/n 09858 0 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pace 33 Summary for Pond 3P: Bio Retention Pond Inflow Area = 24,027 sf, 38.89%Impervious, Inflow Depth > 6.62" for 100 Year event Inflow = 4.28 cfs @ 12.09 hrs, Volume= 13,260 cf Outflow = 4.07 cfs @ 12.11 hrs, Volume= 11,098 cf, Atten=5%, Lag= 1.2 min Primary = 4.07 cfs @ 12.11 hrs, Volume= 11,098 d Routing by Stor-Ind method,Time Span=5.00-20.00 hrs,dt=0.05 hrs/3 Peak Elev= 160.73'@ 12.11 hrs Surf.Area= 1,274 sf Storage=2,662 cf Plug-Flow detention time=72.0 min calculated for 11,061 cf(83%of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time=26.2 min (791.4-765.2) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 158.00' 2,833 cf Custom Stage Data(Prismatic)Listed below Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic-feet) (cubic feet) 158.00 639 0 0 160.90 1,315 2,833 2,833 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 157.20' 1.0"Vert Orifice/Grate C=0.600 #2 Primary 160.20' 4.0' long x 3.0' breadth Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 Coef. (English) 2.44 2.58 2.68 2.67 2.65 2.64 2.64 2.68 2.68 2.72 2.81 2.92 2.97 3.07 3.32 Primary OutFlow Max=3.97 cfs @ 12.11 hrs HW=160.72' (Free Discharge) 1=Orifice/Grate (Orifice Controls 0.05 cfs @ 8.98 fps) 12=Broad-C rested Rectangular Weir (Weir Controls 3.92 cfs @ 1.90 fps) Proposed Type Ill 24-hr 100 Year Rainfall=9.20" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 7/25/2022 HydroCAD®10.00-26 s/n 09858 0 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pape 34 Pond 3P: Bio Retention Pond Hydrograph InFlow 4.28 cfs 0 Primary 4.Olds ! Inflow Area=24,027 sf 4 Peak Elev=160.73' Storage=2,662 cf 3 3 0 LL 2 1 � i 0 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) Proposed Type/1/ 24-hr 100 Year Rainfall=9.20" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 7/25/2022 HydroCAD®10 00-26 s/n 09858 ©2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 35 Summary for Link 5L: Design Point Inflow Area = 44,441 sf, 21.02% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 5.59" for 100 Year event Inflow = 7.12 cfs @ 12.11 hrs, Volume= 20,694 cf Primary = 7.12 cfs @ 12.11 hrs, Volume= 20,694 cf, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary outflow= Inflow, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Link 5L: Design Point Hydrograph ❑Inflow 7 12 cfsl ❑Primary 7.1 2cfs Inflow Area=44,441 sf 7 I 6 5 N U 4 0 LL 3 2 0 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) Tara Orlando From: chris stevenscompanies.org<chris@stevenscompanies.org> Sent: Thursday,June 9,2022 11:31 AM To: James Natarelli Cc: Nfichal Nowak;Tara Orlando Subject: Revised Drainage Plan Attachments: SITE-PLAN-1NL-1RKS-RAIN GARDENrev6.pdf Good morning all, Attached please find our revised drainage plan. The revisions include the following: 1.)A detail of the control structure which addresses the concern for clogging. 2.)An impermeable trench and detail in conformance with the recommendation by Soundview Engineering. 3.)An added drainage swell adjacent to the property line, towards the rear of the property,to address the variation in grades identified by Soundview and more particularly to assure that all storm water runoff is direct to the stream without spill over to the adjoining property. Thankyou 1 Christopher S. Utschig P.E. 914 391-9550 65 Ralph Ave,White Plains NY 10606 chris@stevenscompanies.org June 3, 2022 Rev 6/9/22 viiidyc ui Ryr Biuuk 938 King Street Public Works and Engineering Michal Nowak D C RE: 18 Hillandale JUN - 9 2022 VILLAGE OF RYE: BROOK BUILDING DEPARTMENT Dear Muir. Nowak Enclosed please find revised drawings for the referenced property.The revisions proposed have been developed in response to an observed groundwater flow into the retention basin.The basin has to date generally ft inrtinned as desipm rl, filling anrd draining with Storm Pvant,; Hownvnr there has hnPn shallow depth of what appeared to be stagnant water that remained in the basin. It was our anticipation that the maturing of the wetland vegetation within the pond would eventually absorb this standing water. While the plants have indeed thrived and while that came with reduction in the standing water there still persists some shallow pooling.Through observation we have been determined that there is a ground water flow feeding continuously into the pond that exceeds the uptake of the planted material. To address the groundwater flow we are suggesting an underdrain pipe with sand filter be installed along the length of the pond with a controlled outlet.The controlled outlet would then bypass the infiltration trench and feed directly to the stream, the design proposes an 1'orifice as the control which would limit the outlet to a de minimis 0.04 cfs at the height of a storm. The underdrain would then relieve the pond system of the continuous flow while leaving its stormwater mitigation function as originally intended to fiii and then compietely drain post storms. In response to the comment by James Natarelli regarding the initial submission we have modeled the runoff of the entire property for both the pre and post construction condition for the 25 and 100 Year storm events. The results are as follows. Design Storm Pre Dev(cfs) Post Dev(cfs) _ 25YR _ 3.6 3.2 100YR 5.8 5.7 Sincerely, Christopher S. Utschig Existing Subcat Rea on Link Routing Diagram for Existing Prepared by{enter your company name here}, Printed 6/9/2022 HydroCAD®10.00-26 s/n 09858 0 2020 HydmCAD Software Solutions LLC Existing Prepared by(enter your company name here) Printed 6/9/2022 HydroCAD810.00-26 s/n 09858 02020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pane 2 Area Listing (selected nodes) Area CN Description (sq-ft) (subcatchment-numbers) 37,268 74 >75%Grass cover, Good, HSG C (1S) 7,210 98 Paved parking, HSG C (1S) 44,478 78 TOTAL AREA Existing Prepared by (enter your company name here) Printed 6/9/2022 HydroCAD®10.00-26 s/n 09858 ®2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pape 3 Soil Listing (selected nodes) Area Soil Subcatchment (sq-ft) Group Numbers 0 HSG A 0 HSG B 44,478 HSG C 1 S 0 HSG D 0 Other 44,478 TOTAL AREA Existing Type 111 24-hr 25 Year Rainfall=6.40" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 6/9/2022 HydroCAD@ 10.00-26 s/n 09858 ©2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 4 Summary for Subcatchment 1S: Existing Runoff = 3.55 cfs @ 12.21 hrs, Volume= 13,617 cf, Depth> 3.67" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type III 24-hr 25 Year Rainfall=6.40" Area (sf) CN Description 37,268 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C 7,210 98 Paved parking, HSG C 44,478 78 Weighted Average 37,268 83.79% Pervious Area 7,210 16.21% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (fUsec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment 1S: Existing Hydrograph ❑Runoff 3 cis Type III 24-hr 25 Year Rainfall=6.40" 3 Runoff Area=44,478 sf Runoff Volume=13,617 cf Runoff Depth>3.67" 0 2 Tc=15.0 min LL CN=78 0 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) Existing Type /// 24-hr 100 Year Rainfall=9.20" Prepared by {enter your company name here) Printed 6/9/2022 HydroCAD®10.00-26 s/n 09858 ©2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 5 Summary for Subcatchment 1S: Existing Runoff = 5.79 cfs @ 12.20 hrs, Volume= 22,667 cf, Depth> 6.12" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type III 24-hr 100 Year Rainfall=9.20" Area (so CN Description 37,268 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C 7,210 98 Paved parking, HSG C 44,478 78 Weighted Average 37,268 83.79% Pervious Area 7,210 16.21% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (fttft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment 1S: Existing Hydrograph ❑Runoff 6 1579cfs Type III 24-hr 5 100 Year Rainfall=9.20" Runoff Area=44,478 sf 4 Runoff Volume=22,667 cf Runoff Depth>6.12" 3 Tc=15.0 min LL CN=78 2 1 0 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) (is Proposed 2P Cultec Chambers 43P Bio Retention Pond n Subcat Rea on Link Routing Diagram for Proposed Prepared by{enter your company name here}, Printed t3=022 HydroCAD®10.00-26 On 09858 0 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Proposed Prepared by(enter your company name here) Printed 6/9/2022 HydroCAD010.00-26 s/n 09858 02020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pace 2 Area Listing (all nodes) Area CN Description (sq-ft) (subcatchment-numbers) 34,868 74 (1S) 9,610 98 Paved parking, HSG C (1S) 44,478 79 TOTAL AREA Proposed Prepared by{enter your company name here} Printed 6/9/2022 fydroCAD®10.00-26 s/n 09858 ®2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pace 3 Soil Listing (all nodes) Area Soil Subcatchment (sq-ft) Group Numbers 0 HSG A 0 HSG B 9,610 HSG C IS 0 HSG D 34,868 Other 1S 44,478 TOTAL AREA Proposed Prepared by(enter your company name here) Printed 6/9/2022 HydroCAD®10.00-26 s/n 09858 02020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pane 4 Ground Covers (all nodes) HSG-A HSG-B HSG-C HSG-D Other Total Ground Subcatchment (sq-ft) (sq-ft) (sq-ft) (sq-ft) (sq-ft) (sq-ft) Cover Numbers 0 0 0 0 34,868 34,868 1S 0 0 9,610 0 0 9,610 Paved parking 1S 0 0 9,610 0 34,868 44,478 TOTAL AREA Proposed Type 111 24-hr 25 Year Rainfall=6.40" Prepared by{enter your company name here} Printed 6/9/2022 HydroCAD®10.00-26 s/n 09858 ®2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae 5 Time span=5.00-20.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs,301 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS,Weighted-CN Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Subcatchment 1S: Proposed Runoff Area=44,478 sf 21.61% Impervious Runoff Depth>3.78" Tc=15.0 min CN=79 Runoff=3.64 cfs 13,994 cf Pond 2P: Cultec Chambers Peak Elev=225.78' Storage=503 cf Inflow=3.64 cfs 13,994 cf Discarded=0.50 cfs 9,144 cf Primary=3.29 cfs 4,895 cf Outflow-3.79 cfs 14,039 cf Pond 3P: Bio Retention Pond Peak Elev=162.38' Storage=1,430 cf Inflow=3.29 cfs 4,895 cf Outflow=3.20 cfs 4,982 cf Total Runoff Area=44,478 sf Runoff Volume= 13,994 cf Average Runoff Depth =3.78" 78.39% Pervious=34,868 sf 21.61% Impervious=9,610 sf Proposed Type Ili 24-hr 25 Year Rainfaii=6.40" Prepared by {enter your company name here) Printed 6/9/2022 HydroCAD®10.00-26 s/n 09858 ©2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 6 Summary for Subcatchment 1S: Proposed Runuri = 3.64 crs L 12.211 his, 'vuiurne= 13,994 cr, Depih-- 3.78" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type III 24-hr 25 Year Rainfall=6.40" Area (so CN Description 9,6 i 0 96 raved pai king, HSG C 34,868 74 44,478 79 Weighted Average 34,868 78.39% Pervious Area 9,610 21.61% Impervious Area Tc Lengiil Siupe Veiociiy Capaciiy Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (fUsec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment 1S: Proposed i i'y'ui vyiaYi 4 ❑Runoff 3 64 ffs Type III 24-hr 25 Year Rainfall=6.40" 3 Runoff Area=44,478 sf Runoff Volume=13,994 cf Runoff Depth>3.78" 2 Tc=15.0 min C N=79 II 0 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) Proposed Type iil 24-hr 25 Year Rainfaii=6.40" Prepared by(enter your company name here) Printed 6/9/2022 HydroCAD®10.00-26 s/n 09858 ®2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pace 7 Hydrograph for Subcatchment 1S: Proposed Time Precip. Excess Runoff Time Precip. Excess Runoff (hours) (inches) (inches) (cfs) (hours) (inches) (inches) (cfs) 5.00 0.36 0.00 0.00 18.25 5.96 3.65 0.09 5.25 0.39 0.00 0.00 18.50 5.99 3.67 0.09 5.50 0.41 0.00 0.00 18.75 6.01 3.69 0.09 5.75 0.44 0.00 0.00 19.00 6.04 3.71 0.09 6.00 0.46 0.00 0.00 19.25 6.06 3.73 0.09 6.25 0.49 0.00 0.00 19.50 6.08 3.75 0.08 6.50 0.52 0.00 0.00 19.75 6.10 3.77 0.08 6.75 0.55 0.00 0.00 20.00 6.12 3.79 0.08 7.00 0.58 0.00 0.00 7.25 0.61 0.00 0.01 7.50 0.65 0.01 0.01 7.75 0.69 0.01 0.01 8.00 0.73 0.01 0.02 8.25 0.77 0.02 0.02 8.50 0.82 0.03 0.03 8.75 0.88 0.04 0.04 9.00 0.93 0.05 0.05 9.25 1.00 0.07 0.06 9.50 1.06 0.09 0.07 9.75 1.13 0.11 0.09 10.00 1.21 0.14 0.10 10.25 1.29 0.17 0.12 10.50 1.39 0.21 0.15 10.75 1.49 0.25 0.17 11.00 1.60 0.31 0.21 11.25 1.74 0.38 0.25 11.50 1.91 0.47 0.34 11.75 2.27 0.69 0.62 12.00 3.20 1.34 1.69 12.25 4.13 2.07 3.47 12.50 4.49 2.37 1.81 12.75 4.66 2.52 0.81 13.00 4.80 2.63 0.54 13.25 4.91 2.73 0.42 13.50 5.01 2.81 0.38 13.75 5.11 2.89 0.34 14.00 5.19 2.97 0.31 14.25 5.27 3.03 0.28 14.50 5.34 3.09 0.26 14.75 5.40 3.15 0.25 15.00 5.47 3.21 0.23 15.25 5.52 3.26 0.22 15.50 5.58 3.31 0.20 15.75 5.63 3.35 0.18 16.00 5.67 3.39 0.17 16.25 5.71 3.42 0.15 16.50 5.75 3.46 0.14 16.75 5.79 3.49 0.14 17.00 5.82 3.52 0.13 17.25 5.85 3.55 0.12 17.50 5.88 3.58 0.12 17.75 5.91 3.60 0.11 18.00 5.94 3.63 0.10 Proposed Type 11124-hr 25 Year Rainfall=6.40" Prepared by{enter your company name here} Printed 6/9/2022 HydroCAD910.00-26 s/n 09858 02020 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pape 8 Summary for Pond 2P: Cultec Chambers [93]Warning:Storage range exceeded by 60.78' [88]Warning:Qout>Qin may require smaller dt or Finer Routing [85]Warning:Oscillations may require smaller dt or Finer Routing (severity=4) Inflow Area= 44,478 sf, 21.61% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 3.78" for 25 Year event Inflow = 3.64 cfs @ 12.21 hrs, Volume= 13,994 cf Outflow = 3.79 cfs cQ 12.24 hrs, Volume= 14,039 cf, Atten=0%, Lag=2.0 min Discarded = 0.50 cfs @ 11.75 hrs, Volume= 9,144 cf Primary = 3.29 cfs @ 12.24 hrs, Volume= 4,895 cf Routing by Stor-Ind method,Time Span=5.00-20.00 hrs, dt--0.05 hrs/3 Peak Elev=225.78'@ 12.24 hrs Surf.Area=2 sf Storage=503 cf Plug-Flow detention time=(not calculated:outflow precedes inflow) Center-of-Mass det.time=3.7 min (791.4-787.7) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 162.50' 503 cf Cultec R-330XLHD x 9 Effective Size=47.8"W x 30.0"H =>7.45 sf x 7.001=52.2 cf Overall Size=52.0'W x 30.5"H x 8.50'L with 1.50' Overlap Row Length Adjustment--+1.50'x 7.45 sf x 3 rows Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Discarded 162.50' 0.50 cfs Exflltration when above 162.50' #2 Primary 164.50' 4.0"Vert Orifice/Grate C=0.600 Qiscarded OutFiow Max=0.50 cfs Q 11.75 hrs HW=162.63' (Free Discharge) 'L1=Exflltration (Exflltration Controls 0.50 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=3.19 cfs @ 12.24 hrs HW=222.23' (Free Discharge) L2=Orifice/Grate (Orifice Controls 3.19 cfs Cal 36.53 fps) Proposed Type iii 24-hr 26 Year Rainraii=6.40" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 6/9/2022 HydroCAD®10.00-26 s/n 09858 ©2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 9 Pond 2P: Cultec Chambers iiyuiGy-idNii ❑Inflow Outflow 3.—, 1S Inflow Area=44,478 sf ❑Prmarded i ry 4 Peak Elev=225.78' 329cfa ` Storage=503 cf 3- 2 0 0 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) Pond 2r: Cultee Chlaiiibers Stage-Discharge Total 0 Discarded ❑Primary 225- 220 215- 210 205 200 e 0 195 m 190- W 185 180 - 175 170 Orifice/Grate 165 0 1 2 3 Discharge (afa) Proposed Type m 24-hr 25 'rear mainfaii=6.40" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 6/9/2022 HydroCAD®10.00-26 s/n 09858 ©2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 10 Pond 2P: Cultec Chambers :pia yc-iyi @a-�iiii nyE ❑Storage 225 220 215 210 205 200 c m 195 d 190 w 185 180 175 1iu 165 [4jZ;��_�Cultec R-330XLHD 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 Storage(cubic-feet) 00,0 90'0 90'0 1,9'Z9L IF 80'0 00'0Z 00'0 80'0 80'0 1,9'Z9L b 90'0 09'61. 00'0 60'0 60'0 L9'Z91, b 60'0 00'61, 00'0 60'0 60'0 ZTM b 60'0 09'81, 00'0 OL'0 0Vo Z9'Z9L 9 0Vo 00'8L 00,0 ZL'0 ZL'0 Z9 M 9 ZL'0 0911, 00'0 EL'0 £L'0 Z9'Z% 9 £1,'0 0011, 00'0 trVo t?Vo Z9"Z91. 9 trVo 09'9L 00'0 LL'0 LL'0 E9'Z9L L LL'O 00'91, 00'0 OZ'0 OZ'O E9'Z9L 6 OZ'0 09'9L 00'0 EZ'O EZ'0 v9'Z% OL EZ'O 00'91, 00'0 9Z,0 9Z'0 v9'Z9L ZL 9Z'o 09171, 00'0 09'0 09'0 9L'Z9L OL L£'o 00111, 00'0 09'0 09'0 WE% 1,9E 8E'0 WE1. 90'0 09'0 99'0 L91r9L 98V b9'O MEL ZO'L 050 Z9'L WOL& cog W8 09'ZL 08'0 09*0 O£'L 6Z'M 909 69'L 00'ZL 00'0 Wo K'0 99'Z% 91, K'o 09'L L 00-0 OZ'O OZ'0 £9'Z9L 6 LZ'o 0011, L 00'0 bl'0 17VO Z9 M 9 9L'O 09,01, 00'0 0Vo 0Vo Z9 M 9 0Vo 00'OL 00'0 LO'O LO'O 1,TM £ LO'O 09'6 00'0 90'0 90'0 L9 M Z 90,0 00'6 00"0 £0'0 EO'o LTM L £0'0 09'9 00'0 Z0'0 ZO'O OTT L ZO'0 00'8 00'0 LO'O LO'0 OTT 0 LO'O 091 00,0 000 00,0 09,z% 0 00*0 00 L 00'0 00'0 00'0 09'M 0 00'0 09'9 00'0 00'0 00'0 OTT 0 00'0 00'9 00'0 00'0 00'0 OTT 0 00'0 09'9 00'0 00'0 00'0 09'Z91. 0 00'0 00'9 s:P W W lead lea;-olgno sp sinot4 tiewud papjeosiQ Molpno uogene13 e6ejo1S Mogul ewll sjagwego oeMn:D :dZ puod JOJ 4deiBojpAH L L a ed 01-1 suognloS QJBMUoS(]VOOJP H OZOZ® M60 u/s 9Z-00*0 60VOWPAH ZZOZ/6/9 Muud {ajeq aweu Auedwoo inoA jejua}Aq pa.iedaid .OV9=UeJure29 lea, 9,37 J4-0Z 1/1 adAI posodoad Proposed Type 11124-hr 25 Year Rainfall=6.40" Prepared by(enter your company name here) Printed 6/9/2022 HydroCAD010.00-26 s/n 09858 02020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 12 Summary for Pond 3P: Bio Retention Pond Inflow Area= 44,478 sf, 21.61%Impervious, Inflow Depth= 1.32" for 25 Year event Inflow = 3.29 ds @ 12.24 hrs, Volume= 4,895 d Outflow = 3.20 cfs @ 12.25 hrs, Volume= 4,982 d, Atten=3%, Lag=0.3 min Primary = 3.20 cis @ 12.25 hrs, Volume= 4,982 d Routing by Stor-Ind method,Time Span=5.00-20.00 hrs,dt=0.05 hrs/3 Peak Elev= 162.38'Q 12.25 hrs Surf.Area=0 sf Storage= 1,430 d Plug-Flow detention time=28.4 min calculated for 4,883 d(100%of inflow) Center-of-Mass det. time=32.4 min(771.0-738.6) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 158.00' 1,500 d Custom Stage Data Listed below Elevation Cum.Store (feet) (cubic-feet) 158.00 0 162.60 1,500 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 158.00' 2.0"Vert Orifice/Grate C=0.600 #2 Primary 161.95' 4.0'long x 3.0'breadth Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 Coef. (English) 2.44 2.58 2.68 2.67 2.65 2.64 2.64 2.68 2.68 2.72 2.81 2.92 2.97 3.07 3.32 Primary OutFlow Max=3.15 cfs @ 12.25 hrs HW=162.38' (Free Discharge) 11=0rifice/Grate (Orifice Controls 0.22 cis @ 9.98 fps) 2=13road-Crested Rectangular Weir (Weir Controls 2.93 ds @ 1.70 fps) Proposed Type iii 24-hr 25 'rear Rainiail=6.40" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 6/9/2022 HydroCAD®10.00-26 s/n 09858 ©2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 13 Pond 3P: Bio Retention Pond Fi'y'u'i vyTnNii `-i Inflow 1 3.29 cts ❑Primary 320cfs Inflow Area=44,478 sf 3 Peak Elev=162.38' ' Storage=1 ,430 cf 2 LL I 1 0 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) runu 3r. oiu Rkrteiniun ruiiu Stage-Discharge ❑Primary 162 Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir 161 v d C O 160 w 159 Orifice/Grate 158 0 1 2 3 4 5 Discharge (cfs) Proposed Type 11124-hr 25 Year Rainfall=6.40" Prepared by{enter your company name here} Printed 6/9/2022 HydroCAD®10.00-26 s/n 09858 0 2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae 14 Pond 3P: Bio Retention Pond Stage-Area-Storage 0 Storage 162 161 to 160 w 159 _c�6oh1.8E$AB-pea: 156 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 600 900 1,000 1,100 1,200 1,300 1,400 1,500 Storage(cubic-feet) 00'0 00'89L L 00'0 00'0Z 00'0 00'89L L 00,0 09'6L 00,0 LO M z 00'0 00'% 00'0 LB'89L £ 00'0 09'9L 00'0 z0'89L 9 00'0 00'9L 00'0 ZO M 8 00'0 091L 00'0 170'89L zL 00'0 0011, LO'0 90'89L OZ 00'0 09'91, z0'0 £L'89L Lb OTO 00'9L 90'0 ££'89 L LO L 00'0 09'9 L 80'0 OEM 6ZZ 00'0 00'9L LL'O bZ'69L 9017 00'0 09,14 t►L'0 96'69L 9£9 00'0 00'VL LVO Z8'09L LZ6 00'0 OTC OZ'O Z91% 9trZ'L 90'0 00'£L ZZI LVZU 69f`L ZO'L 09'ZL 60'0 Meg OL 09*0 00'ZL 00'0 00'89 L 0 00'0 09'L L 00'0 00'89 L 0 00'0 00'L L 00'0 00'89 L 0 00'0 09'0 L 00'0 00'89L 0 00'0 00'0L 00'0 00'89L 0 00'O 09'6 00'0 00'891, 0 00'0 00'6 00'0 00'89 L 0 00'0 09'8 00'0 00'89L 0 00'0 00'8 00'0 00'89 L 0 00'0 091 00,0 00'89L 0 00*0 00-L 00'0 00'89L 0 00'0 09'9 00'0 OUM 0 00'0 00'9 00'0 00'891. 0 00'0 09'9 00'0 00'89L 0 00'0 00'9 sp lam l--,-4-o!qno sp sinoy f,Jewud uo!lene13 e6ejolS Mogul aw!1 puod uoRua;aN 018 :d£ PUOd J0; gdeaBojPAH 9 L a ed 011 suognloS 9JRMUoS OVOOJP H OZOZ 0 99960 u/s 9Z-00'0 L®OdoaP H ZZOZ/6/9 Paluud {away oweu Auedwoo inoA jalua}Aq paiedWd „O>y'9=l1eJule&JeGA gZ Af-ftZ/// -^df1 posodOJd Proposed Type 111 24-hr 100 Year Rainfall=9.20" Prepared by{enter your company name here} Printed 6/9/2022 HydroCADO 10.00-26 s/n 09858 ®2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pane 16 Time span=5.00-20.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs, 301 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS,Weighted-CN Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Subcatchment 1S: Proposed Runoff Area=44,478 sf 21.61%Impervious Runoff Depth>6.24" Tc=15.0 min CN=79 Runoff=5.69 cfs 23,119 cf Pond 2P: Cultec Chambers Peak Elev=364.65' Storage=503 cf Inflow=5.89 cfs 23,119 cf Discarded=0.50 cfs 12,972 cf Primary=5.94 cfs 10,060 cf Outflow=6.44 cfs 23,032 cf Pond 3P: Bio Retention Pond Peak Elev=162.59' Storage=1,497 of Inflow=5.94 cfs 10,060 cf Outflow=5.73 cfs 9,989 cf Total Runoff Area=44,478 sf Runoff Volume=23,119 cf Average Runoff Depth =6.24" 78.39% Pervious=34,868 sf 21.61% Impervious=9,610 sf Proposed Type hl 24-hr 100 Year Rainraii=9.20" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 6/9/2022 HydroCAD®10.00-26 s/n 09858 ©2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 17 Summary for Subcatchment 1S: Proposed Runuif = 5.89 cis L 12.20 his, Vuiuniu= 23,1 19 d, Depth> 6.24" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type III 24-hr 100 Year Rainfall=9.20" Area (sf) CN Description 9,610 98 Paved parking, HSG C 34,868 74 44,478 79 Weighted Average 34,868 78.39% Pervious Area 9,610 21.61% Impervious Area T c Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment 1S: Proposed i iyuiQyiuNii ❑Runoff 6 T Type III 24-hr 100 Year Rainfall=9.20" J Runoff Area=44,478 sf 4_ Runoff Volume=23,119 cf Runoff Depth>6.24" 3 Tc=15.0 min CN=79 2- 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) 9L'0 l0'9 K'8 00'8L 9VO L6'9 09'8 9L'LL LL'0 176'9 9b'8 09'LL 6 L'0 68'9 07'8 9Z'L L OZ-0 98'9 L£'8 001 L LZ'O 08'9 Z£'8 9L'9L ZZ'0 9L'9 LZ'8 09'9 L EZ'O OL'9 LZ'8 9Z'9L 9Z'0 99'9 9L'8 00'9L 8Z'0 69'9 60'8 9L'9 L 0£'0 E9'9 ZO'8 09'9 L EE'O 917'9 b6'L 9Z'9L 9£'0 OV9 981 00'9L 8£'0 6Z'9 LL'L 9L'K OVO OZ'9 L91 09"17L £b'0 L L'9 L9'L 9Z'K 8b'0 LO'9 9171 0014 £9'0 06'17 K'L 9L'EL 99'0 Ofir LZ'L 09,6E 99'0 b917 901 9Z'EL E8'0 6111F 06'9 00'EL 9Z'L ZE'b LL'9 9L'ZL 178'Z 60'b 9ti'9 09'ZL 69*9 Z9'£ E6'9 9Z'ZL OL'Z 91p'Z 09'17 00'ZL 0 L'L 6£'L LZ'£ 9L'L L Z9'0 00'L bL,Z 09'L L Lb'O 88'0 6177 9Z'L L 6E'O LL'O O£'Z 00'L L K'O L9'O t?VZ 9L'OL 6Z'0 Z9'0 661 09'OL 9Z'O Wo 99'L 9Z'OL ZZ'O 8E'0 bL'L 00'O L 6 L'0 ZE'0 E9'l 9L'6 L L'0 LZ'O E9'L 09'6 9L'0 EZ'0 Eb'L 9Z'6 EL'0 6L'0 WL 00'6 L L'0 9 L'0 9Z'L 9L'8 60'0 E L'O 8 L'L 09'8 80'0 0 L'0 L L'L 9Z'8 90,0 80'0 90'L 00'8 90'0 LO'O 66'0 9L'L 90'0 90'0 £6'0 091 170,0 170'0 88'0 9Z'L EO'O EO'0 E8'0 001 ZL'0 8Z'8 09*9 00'0Z £0'0 ZO'O 6L'O 9L'9 ZL'0 £Z'9 LL'8 9L'6L ZO'0 ZO'0 bL'0 09'9 EL'0 OZ'9 VL'8 09'6L LO'O LO'0 OL'O 9Z'9 EL'0 LL'9 LL'8 9Z'6L LO'O LO'0 99'0 00'9 £L'0 14*9 89'8 00'6L LO'0 00'0 E9'0 9L'9 I L'O L L'9 V9'8 9L'8 L 00'0 00'0 69'0 09'9 17L'0 80'9 L9'8 09'8L 00'0 00'0 99'0 9Z'9 VVO ti0'9 L9'9 9Z'8L 00,0 00'0 Z9'0 00'9 sp seyoui seyow sinot (sp) (seLpui s2t,put Unoy Iound sseox3 'dbeid ewil gouna ssaox3 dtoejd ewil pesodoJd :S� juawyolaNnS Jo; ydejBapAH 9 L a Bd oll suognlog ejemUoS 4yOaP H OZOZ® 99960 u/s 9Z-00'OL®OdOaP H ZZOZ/6/9 Paiuud {aiay aweu Auedwoo inoA jajua}Aq paiedaJd „OZ'6=11Pulea JeGA ON J",7!ll odAl posodOJd Proposed Type 11124-hr 100 Year Rainfall=9.20" Prepared by (enter your company name here) Printed 6/9/2022 HydroCAD910.00-26 s/n 09858 02020 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pape 19 Summary for Pond 2P: Cultec Chambers [93]Warning: Storage range exceeded by 199.65' [88]Warning: Qout>Qin may require smaller dt or Finer Routing [85]Warning:Oscillations may require smaller dt or Finer Routing (severity--9) Inflow Area = 44,478 sf, 21.61%Impervious, Inflow Depth > 6.24" for 100 Year event Inflow = 5.89 cfs @ 12.20 hrs, Volume= 23,119 cf Outflow = 6.44 cfs Q 12.20 hrs, Volume= 23,032 cf, Atten=0%, Lag=0.0 min Discarded = 0.50 cfs @ 11.35 hrs, Volume= 12,972 cf Primary = 5.94 cfs @ 12.20 hrs, Volume= 10,060 cf Routing by Stor-Ind method,Time Span=5.00-20.00 hrs, dt--0.05 hrs/3 Peak Elev=364.65' @ 12.20 hrs Surf.Area=2 sf Storage=503 cf Plug-Flow detention time=5.7 min calculated for 23,032 cf(100%of inflow) Center-of-Mass det.time=4.2 min (780.0-775.9) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 162.50' 503 cf Cultec R-330XLHD x 9 Effective Size=47.8"W x 30.0"H=>7.45 sf x 7.001=52.2 cf Overall Size=52.0'W x 30.5"H x 8.501 with 1.50'Overiap Row Length Adjustment--+1.50'x 7.45 sf x 3 rows Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Discarded 162.50' 0.50 cfs Exfiltration when above 162.50' #2 Primary 164.50' 4.0"Vert. Orifice/Grate C=0.600 Discarded OutFlow Max=0.50 cfs cQ 11.35 hrs HW=162.59' (Free Discharge) t1=Exflltratlon (Exfiltration Controls 0.50 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=5.92 cfs @ 12.20 hrs HW=363.22' (Free Discharge) t2=Orifice/Grate (Orifice Controls 5.92 cfs @ 67.85 fps) Proposed Type iii 24-hr iuv Year nainraii=y.2u" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 6/9/2022 HydroCAD®10.00-26 s/n 09858 ©2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 20 Pond 2P: Cultec Chambers ❑Inflow Outflow e.44 cis�r8 Inflow Area=44,478 sf ❑P maryed 7 Peak Elev=364.65' 6 Storage=503 cf 5 `u 4 o U_ 3 ' 2 0. 0 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) Pond 2r. Cuttec Clhainbeis Stage-Discharge Total / ❑Discarded 360 ❑Primary 110 340 330 320 310 300 i -- 290 270 =0 260 > 'u 250 w 240 230 220 ?in 200 190 - 180 r 170 Onfice]Grate 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Discharge (cfs) Proposed Type ill 24-nr -100 Year Rainraii=9.20" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 6/9/2022 ydroCAD®10.00-26 s/n 09858 ©2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 21 Pond 2P: Cultec Chambers $iage-Aiea-aiG7age 360 ❑Storage 350 340 330 320 310 300 290 280 270 260 'w 250 w 240 230 220 210 200 190 180 I 1 170 Cultec R-330XLHD 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 Storage(cubic-feet) Proposed Type 111 24-hr 100 Year Rainfall=9.20" Prepared by(enter your company name here) Printed 6/9/2022 HydroCAD®10.00-26 s/n 09858 02020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae 22 Hydrograph for Pond 2P: Cuftec Chambers Time Inflow Storage Elevation Outflow Discarded Primary (hours) (cfs) (cubic-feet) (feet) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) 5.00 0.00 0 162.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.50 0.00 0 162.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.01 0 162.50 0.01 0.01 0.00 6.50 0.02 1 162.50 0.02 0.02 0.00 7.00 0.03 1 162.51 0.03 0.03 0.00 7.50 0.05 2 162.51 0.05 0.05 0.00 8.00 0.06 3 162.51 0.06 0.06 0.00 8.50 0.09 4 162.51 0.09 0.09 0.00 9.00 0.13 6 162.52 0.13 0.13 0.00 9.50 0.17 8 162.53 0.17 0.17 0.00 10.00 0.22 10 162.54 0.22 0.22 0.00 10.50 0.29 13 162.55 0.29 0.29 0.00 11.00 0.39 17 162.56 0.39 0.39 0.00 11.50 0.62 64 162.74 0.50 0.50 0.00 12.00 2.70 503 207.68 3.26 0.50 2.76 12.50 2.84 503 212.23 3.40 0.50 2.90 13.00 0.83 503 165.72 0.93 0.50 0.43 13.50 0.58 488 164.71 0.59 0.50 0.09 14.00 0.48 464 164.51 0.50 0.50 0.00 14.50 0.40 345 163.88 0.50 0.50 0.00 15.00 0.35 125 162.97 0.50 0.50 0.00 15.50 0.30 14 162.55 0.30 0.30 0.00 16.00 0.25 11 162.54 0.25 0.25 0.00 16.50 0.22 10 162.54 0.22 0.22 0.00 17.00 0.20 9 162.53 0.20 0.20 0.00 17.50 0.17 8 162.53 0.17 0.17 0.00 18.00 0.15 7 162.53 0.15 0.15 0.00 18.50 0.14 6 162.52 0.14 0.14 0.00 19.00 0.13 6 162.52 0.13 0.13 0.00 19.50 0.13 6 162.52 0.13 0.13 0.00 20.00 0.12 5 162.52 0.12 0.12 0.00 Proposed Type 11124-hr 100 Year Rainfall=9.20" Prepared by (enter your company name here) Printed 6/9/2022 HydroCAD010.00-26 s/n 09858 02020 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pane 23 Summary for Pond 3P: Bio Retention Pond Inflow Area= 44,478 sf, 21.61% Impervious, Inflow Depth= 2.71" for 100 Year event Inflow = 5.94 cfs @ 12.20 hrs, Volume= 10,060 cf Outflow = 5.73 cis @ 12.20 hrs, Volume= 9,989 cf, Atten=4%, Lag=0.1 min Primary = 5.73 cfs @ 12.20 hrs, Volume= 9,989 cf Routing by Star-Ind method,Time Span=5.00-20.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs/3 Peak Elev= 162.59'@ 12.20 hrs Surf.Area=0 sf Storage= 1,497 cf Plug-Flow detention time=21.6 min calculated for 9,956 cf(99%of inflow) Center-of-Mass det.time=21.7 min (761.4-739.7) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 158.00' 1,500 cf Custom Stage Data Listed below Elevation Cum.Store (feet) (cubic-feet) 158.00 0 162.60 1,500 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 158.00' 2.0"Vert Orifice/Grate C=0.600 #2 Primary 161.95' 4.0' long x 3.0' breadth Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 Coef. (English) 2.44 2.58 2.68 2.67 2.65 2.64 2.64 2.68 2.68 2.72 2.81 2.92 2.97 3.07 3.32 Primary OutFlow Max=5.66 cis @ 12.20 hrs HW=162.59' (Free Discharge) 1�-Orifice/Grate (Orifice Controls 0.22 cis @ 10.22 fps) 2=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir (Weir Controls 5.44 cis @ 2.14 fps) Proposed Type lit 24-nr 100 'rear Rainraii=9.2u" Prepared by {enter your company name here} Printed 6/9/2022 HydroCADO 10.00-26 s/n 09858 ©2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 24 Pond 3P: Bio Retention Pond Hydrograph Inflow cfsC5 6 5.73 OPrmary Inflow Area=44,478 sf Peak Elev=162.59' 5 Storage=1 ,497 cf 4 N �I 2 ' 1 � 0 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) n Pond J r.. oi'u Retention eaention A u l-t u Stage-Discharge ❑Primary 162 Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir 161 v u c 0 m 160 w 154 Orfice/Grate 158 0 1 2 3 4 5 Discharge (cfs) Proposed Type///24-hr 100 Year Rainfali=9.20" Prepared by{enter your company name here} Printed 6/9/2022 HydroCAD®10.00-26 s/n 09858 ®2020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pane 25 Pond 3P: Bio Retention Pond Stage-Area-Storage ®store 182 181 0 � 160 w 159 158 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1,000 600 1,200 1,300 1.400 1.500 Storage(cubirfftq Proposed Type 11124-hr 100 Year Rainfalh9.20" Prepared by(enter your company name here) Printed 6/9/2022 HydroCAD010.00-26 s/n 09858 02020 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pane 26 Hydrograph for Pond 313: Bio Retention Pond Time Inflow Storage Elevation Primary (hours) (Cfs) (cubic-feet) (feet) (Cfs) 5.00 0.00 0 158.00 0.00 5.50 0.00 0 158.00 0.00 6.00 0.00 0 158.00 0.00 6.50 0.00 0 158.00 0.00 7.00 0.00 0 158.00 0.00 7.50 0.00 0 158.00 0.00 8.00 0.00 0 158.00 0.00 8.50 0.00 0 158.00 0.00 9.00 0.00 0 158.00 0.00 9.50 0.00 0 158.00 0.00 10.00 0.00 0 158.00 0.00 10.50 0.00 0 158.00 0.00 11.00 0.00 0 158.00 0.00 11.50 0.00 0 158.00 0.00 12.00 2.76 866 160.65 0.17 12.50 2.90 1,417 162.36 2.78 13.00 0.43 1,308 162.01 0.36 13.50 0.09 1,209 161.71 0.20 14.00 0.00 942 160.89 0.18 14.50 0.00 653 160.00 0.15 15.00 0.00 418 159.28 0.12 15.50 0.00 239 158.73 0.08 16.00 0.00 114 158.35 0.05 16.50 0.00 44 158.13 0.02 17.00 0.00 20 158.06 0.01 17.50 0.00 13 158.04 0.00 18.00 0.00 8 158.03 0.00 18.50 0.00 5 158.02 0.00 19.00 0.00 3 158.01 0.00 19.50 0.00 2 158.01 0.00 20.00 0.00 1 158.00 0.00 LJ V V VE T Engineer's Report for Mark Residence .. ".--- D'%AWING �p ale Roa 1'H'S REMEW IS FOR GENE RAL w AND PRACTICES. THE V1UaG =� EYo k RESPp"ISIBJIITY FOR CORREC FUMES NO DET/�ILS, FIELD CpNDCORR , TMESS OF DIAAEF�Isjop; OR APPL DESFGN PROFESSIO,�gL IG4N7 NO EXCEPTION TAKEN MAKE CORRECTIONS NOTED AMEND AfYD RESUBMIT REJECTED - 1 REFER TO REMARKS RYE BROOK ENGINEERING DE} 938 KING STREET �' t Dated October 8, 2020 PHOI x RYE BROOK, Ry 10573 (914)939-0753 FAX g 4 / Revised February 8, 2021 DAT'E _ � ) 939-5.901 Z Prepared by: Christopher S. Utschig P.E. 65 Ralph Ave White Plains, NY 911 391 9550 NYS Professional Engineer Lic# 090138 Engineer's Report Rye Brook,New York 18 Hillandale Road Table of Contents A. Introduction B. Existing Conditions C. Proposed Conditions D. Construction Phasing Plan and Sediment and Erosion Control Management E. Conclusion APPENDIX A Proposed/ Existing Condition Calculations APPENDIX B Detention Pond Calculations APPENDIX C Soil Study Page 12 Engineers Report Rye Brook,New York 18 Hillandole Road A. Introduction This report has been prepared in support of proposed improvements to the property at 18 Hallindale Road, Rye Brook NY.The report and associated plans were prepared in accordance with the Westchester County, NY, Stormwater Management Best Management Practices for Stormwater Runoff Control in compliance with the requirements of the Village of Rye Brook pursuant to Storm Water Control Permit.The existing C.viiuitivnS identified on she site plan'rJere oaken from a SiirVcy prepared by r,ii5tvu2 IJvurnaL VJ � I uaicu September 15, 2006. B. Existing Conditions The existing property is a 44,478 sf residentially zoned property.The property is developed with an existing two-story home, deck, walks, and driveway,the balance being lawn and landscaping.The subject properties topography can be described as moderateiy siuping irum north to south across the property. Sturrnwdter from landscaped areas leaves the property in an overland fashion, it is understood that the existing impervious areas are piped to onsite infiltration areas.The driveway area is piped to a series of cultecs in the side yard that will be unaffected by the proposed construction.The balance of impervious area has its water directed by pipe to an infiltration system we understand to be in the area of the proposed pool footprint and will need to be re-established in an alternate location. Percolation tests and deeps were conducted, the results are provided on the plans.The soils on the property in the area of the proposed rain garden are a Paxton complex PnC with a Hydraulic soil group Type "C". C. Proposed Condition The proposed condition includes a rear yard in-ground pool and patio.The grading as proposed leaves the existing yard grading essentially untouched and thereby leaving the existing drainage patterns unchanged. As stated previously the pool footprint conflicts with the existing infiltration system,therefore that system will be removed and replaced.The design evaluation to size stormwater mitigation is based on the entire area of impervious area post development inclusive of the existing impervious area to remain excluding the driveway.The impervious area requiring mitigation was computed to be 7,119 sf.The total volume of runoff for the proposed condition impervious areas was calculated at 3,376 cf. The on-site drainage has been designed to provide full mitigation for all impervious areas for the 25 Year Storm Event(6.5").The design proposes a retention basin with a volume of 2.110 cf in combination with (9) Cultec 330 HD's to provide retention for the proposed impervious as well as the existing impervious area excluding the driveway. Piping from the existing impervious areas will be rerouted to the along with drainage from the pool deck to the cultic units that will overflow by pipe to the retention basin. p. rnnctri,rtinn Phasing Plan and Sediment and Erosion Control Management Maintenance of Temporary and Permanent Structures and Practices Temporary and permanent erosion controls measures will be maintained and inspected in accordance with the Grading and Drainage Plan. All proposed soil erosion and sediment control practices are designed in accordance with the following publications: o New York State Standards and Specifications for Erosion and Sediment Control,August 200S, latest Page 13 Engineers Report Rye Brook,New York 18 Hillondale Road edition. o New York State Guidelines for Urban Erosion and Sediment Control, latest edition, o New York State General Permit for Stormwater Discharges, o "Reducing the Impacts of Stormwater Runoff from New Development", as published by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC), second edition, April 1993. The proposed soil erosion and sediment control devices include: protective earthmoving procedures and grading practices, soil stabilization, inlet protection, stabilized construction entrance and silt fencing. The approach of the plan is to control off-site sedimentation, and re-establish vegetation as soon as practicable. Construction shall be implemented in the following order: 1. Erosion and sediment control (ESC) measures and Pollution Prevention (PP) implementation, a) Install silt fences along easterly project limits, b) Maintain existing macadam driveway to utilize as a site construction entrance to the project area, material storage area and dumpster location. i) Contractor shall install stone stabilized entrance at end of the existing paved driveway in advance of construction vehi(ies requiring access from graded/exposed soils iu C4 Streets. c) Install Tree Protection d) Install temporary sanitary facilities (portable toilets) in a location that is at least 20 from any drainage facility or flow path. Recommend staking the facility to prevent accidental tipping by construction activity or wind. e) Install waste container—maintain rigorous site cleaning schedule to prevent debris from blowing off site. Construction waste shall be stored in a dumpster and carried off-site on a regular basis f) Demolish existing structures g) Allocate concrete washout areas 2. Clearing and grubbing. a) Strip top soil and stockpile. Initiate cover practices and sediment controls at the base of the stockpile. Stockpile can be temporarily stabilized with tarp or mulch and/or temporary seeding. b) Disturbed areas where construction will cease for more than 14 days will be stabilized with erosion controls, such hydro-seeding, hydro-mulch, or hay 3. Excavate Pool a) Install dewatering practice if necessary. 4. detc lien pond and p!a^t per the I�^ 4sc�pe p! n b,others. 5. Final stabilization of disturbed areas a) Install minimum 4" topsoil and final stabilize with lawn or mulch in landscape areas. b) Remove all ESC and PP measures upon approval of design engineer and/or ESC inspector. Awarded contractor shall be responsible for the proper implementation of the ESC and PP practices.The following maintenance program is proposed in order to maintain the proper function of all drainage and erosion and sediment control facilities: o Inspect sediment control devices and construction access point routinely and if necessary, remove accumulated sedimentation and debris; at no point should the filter bed be allowed to continue operations beyond 50%of its capacity being compromised by debris. o All disturbed area will be stabilized and the sediment build-up in the filter removed. After the construction is completed, any areas disturbed shall be stabilized immediately after the required work is completed. o Restore and re-seed any eroded areas as soon as possible Page 14 Engineer's Report Rye Brook,New York 18 Hillandole Road o The Stormwater Management Facilities Maintenance Program will be managed by the home owner and shall include removal of sediment from the detention pond facilities. The contractor shall provide a Trained Individual to be present on site at all times during soil disturbing activities Any disturbed areas shall be re-vegetated as soon as possible.Topsoil shall be temporarily stockpiled for future use in grading and landscaping. Stockpile locations have been provided on the Erosion and Sediment Control rlola1U �1011 be�VItOred Jlt'll a �Ilt fence Ilay Ua1C barrier. .1 I / The existing driveway shall be maintained throughout construction to be utilized for the site construction entrance. A temporary stabilized construction entrance comprised of a stone anti-track pad shall be installed as necessary to minimize dirt tracking.The purpose of a stabilized entrance is to remove as much soil from the construction vehicle tires prior to exiting the site and traveling on the existing roadways. For dewatering activities during excavation of the pool, a dewatering pump shall be located in a perforated tub surrounded by filter fabric and stone(or approved alternative). Clean discharge should be directed to onsite drainage appurtenances to minimize erosion of soils. Discharge with suspended sediment shall be connected to a sediment bag on undisturbed ground in a location where the discharge will not cause erosion or flow over exposed soils. If the contractor encounters ground water during the excavation of the filtering system, he shall notify the design engineer immediately.The contractor shall store all excavated material at the designated location show on the Grading and Erosion Control Plan with the appropriate erosion control measures corresponding to the stockpile detail. Contractor shall be responsible for maintaining the cleanliness of the streets (driveways/parking and adjacent areas) and storm drain inlet protection (as applicable) Best Management Practices (BMPs) throughout the construction project. Permanent seeding shall be installed immediately after the final design grades are achieved but no later than fourteen (14) days after rnnstruction activities have ceased After stabilization nrri—j!aterl sediment C:h�all be removed from site for disposal along with construction debris, trash and temporary BMPs E. Conclusion: The implementation of this stormwater management plan will mitigate the post development stormwater flows and not adversely affect the adjacent properties or the existing drainage system. The stormwater runoff generated by the proposed addition has been attenuated by the construction of an underground storage system. Page 15 Engineer's Report Rye Brook,New York 18 Hillandale Road APPENDIX A Proposed Condition Calculations 1 1 I I 1 I { I is iiiii-oroposea 1 1 I I I I i I Subcat Reach Pond Link Routing Diagram for Proposed(no drive) Prepared by Microsoft, Printed 2/8l2021 HydroCAD 10 00-20 shi 09858 ©2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Proposed(no drive) t'ie dfed I MiO-U�VY r=7ifP[L\1 LrOrtcJL r HydroCAD®10 00-20 s/n 09858 ©2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pane 2 Area Listing (all nodes) Area CN Description jtiq-n� Y3Y vr:ariu rc�reir n-r rurrr`v j 7,119 98 Paved paridng, HSG C (1S) i 1 a '3.Q, -rrvr*t A,�A 6%00 � Proposed(no drive) 1 fated 17y1 IVIf(,tft-0-1 tTlrrc�lu c7vrcVL� Hyr^AD®10 00-20 s/n 09858 ®2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Pane 3 Soil Listing (all nodes) Area Soil Subcatchment ��y-n j vruu}r rrcrrra�3 0 HSG A v r 1ov u 7,119 HSG C 1 S 0 HSG D 0 inr rvr 7,119 TOTAL AREA Pr000sed(no drivel Tyoe I!I 24-hr 25 Tear Rainfall=6.40" rrepareu oy iviicrosor[ riufiru L/O1LUL 1 HydroCAD0 1n nn_2n s/n 09858 n 2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 4 Subcatchment 1S: Proposed Hydrograph 0.78 cfs Runoff 0.8 I Type III 24-hr 0.7 25 Tear Rainfall=6.40" 0.6 Runoff Area=7,119 sf Runoff Volume=3,376 cf 0.5 Runoff Depth>5.69" 0 0.4 Tc=15.0 min CN=98 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) Engineer's Report Rye Brook,New York 18 Mandale Road APPENDIX 8 Pond Volume Calculations Christopher Utschig SHM NO. OF � 65 Ralph Ave White Plains MY IfIF46 rALMLATWfff--- -DATF- 914-39i-9550 CHECKM BY DATE L A-A OJ 041 f-0 -4— i I -4- It I If IL9 14 e- I L4�il. r o IeU 7 t:AD I ad C4 K) L ..-A Do jgA iA 6�4�gcc A47 Christopher Utschig SHM No 65 Raiph Ave CALCULATED DATE White Plains, NY 10606 914-391-9550 CHECKED BY DATE SCNE 4--4- 74 1z, ZvILICA A. A i r j j.-I! 062 i AV L44 Im OR rt� ir ............ A- en I I ........... -4- *04j.= jow J ___ —4 44+_._. I it I I I I -tJ JOB Christopher Utschlg SHEET NO. OF 65 Ralph Ave ' White Plains, NY 10606 CALCULATED BY DATE 914-391-9550 CHECKED BY DATE SCALE �LA�%_-T-I'cG FoOn V ok-k"t-Act- Z� IZfz��o I�LrS GAS o� o���l✓ = 9.7 L4 s ip 1: q uX/T- S I-A AvN V-S , mf-' 5 Proposed(no drive] j%�,c iii i�L2f 1Q.u1:T.Fde:'- .- Prepared by Microsoft Printed t/26/2021 HydroCACO 10 00-20 s/n 09858 0 2017 HYdroCAn Software Solutions LLC Page 4 Subcatchment M Proposed Hyarograph l 0.8= 0,78-CJS , Runo Type III 24-hr D.7- 25 Tear Rainfall=6.40" 0.6 Runoff Area=7119 sf >i Runoff Volum 3,376 cf 0 0.5-: Runoff Depth>5.69" D.4 Tc=15.0 min c - 8 rR_caR 0.3 0.2 s 0 � - 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) lGZ � � 35 Christopher Utschig HMO. OF 65 Ralph Ave Mite Plains,NY I CALCIAA7W nATIE 914-391-9550 CHECKED BY DATE SCALE 4--f-4- i A 1� !tn2 =gig g? IA f 0 00 1 4- I em 4.71 :5yvn m 4- -4— I Christopher Utschig s�rNa of 65 R Ave Woe pj�� tV 506 DUE 914391-95 CHBCKED VIAM SCALE IL i CA --,5Mx10 P� i f Jo It 3mli r I Li I lb Engineers Report Rye Brook New York 18 HiHandale Road APPENDIX C Soil Survey iilttCJrt—rmrrw ��1�1vm iK r t >~r-1av1. f�i�.� Willi INUI _ s f4.11691 T=r `I'�1�1�a 1�T•t T=1i► 1`Im Tt�lif 1"'i"ifa 1'-i2�i'TS1S)Si magi rim- 0w 142RF!l�II�Ipsfil M � I I 111111 1 1 Jaw�Ib 11iiii f' �1 � rit, a� 1111 ri I I I I I Rrrj,,rrmrrrn i I I 611111 MOO I 1 1 1 1 1 T > T 1 1 1 1 1 T T 1 R9 F i f J 1 1 III I I l l i i Hiffliffli i i i ppr I I i i I i I III i i i i t I 1 l if i if 1 , filly ! lfIIIIIIIIIlI1111l1IIIlllIlI1111llllllll l 1 1 1 1 1 1 l fit i 1 i 1hd _ MM1111 [Fir I Pr FrallFirl T FFFr � RR rz g Ilflllllllll11111I1f111lIIIllllllllllllll � I 1 1 1 1 fill l If III I Ira 1 . . . . . ► . . . . . . . . . I 1 I I I ia A ` X K C �7f a z m m 6� s c Z = tv � m c� w e � Q 1 tC� 4 ca v ll I b 2i 4 m lip � ° o rR s c o a I M _ � t i� o c� N r.- i+ n N N oil �? 30 1 Is s -9 � ii-� I - w w cm � 3 c c C. 3 �7y 40 Z a ` O 11 W D Q N an d I E ® • sga m � E i onS _ � k $ LE I; l pp o i� - m Q a •Q c E U W m o o °* 3 - m n L�8 LL $ c • •vim " oa, n L oa E f Z a 1 c�� o • m f o P� lb D-ft cC 41 1p 1 i a0 E b g°_ I �' `�!q F y �6 �r 3 0 ts o FaC-c }� = 2! s nt Al oo ! -0 - Q�g • •t s Z _o - ® E 1 _ fi � eta �,� m �N S m m`t f U ( I ) 60 o jo gg� CL D I 3 m a ( Z m 4 o (� v 1 0 Z - a ao > 3 o ao w a of 5 2 .3 a d a W � I s n m g` 1 m rF A b O m 0 O gv $ 1D m am a a $ IS �. _ S t0 I S•e S4 o W m o c a = � � s € CD o I I �� AQUA- s ueft".SOLmn %6'DO1 6'Q if N e�'K+aT*P�1 R 50dptB�u WOO %t'9Z tD £at 0�� 1 eBPl M WM °166 EZ :CO of 8'Weq �! d �d vw mmipe dRW f t o wu1 dolt pub, mun dew W AWN'Apnoo mm wm-'�W Ps REVI J PLA ; JAN 14 2021 DAT D: BUILIDMU i.)� r•AF:I�HENT Engineer's Report for Mark Residence 18 Hillandale Road Rye Brook, New York Dated October 8, 2020 Revised January 13, 2021 Prepared by: Christopher S. Utschig P.E. 65 Ralph Ave White Plains, NY 914 391-9550 NYS Professional Engineer Lic#090138 Engineer's Report Rye Brock,New York 18 Hillandale Road Table of Contents A. Introduction B. Existing Conditions C. Proposed Conditions D. Construction Phasing Plan and Sediment and Erosion Control Management E. Conclusion APPENDIX A Proposed/Existing Condition Calculations APPENDIX B Detention Pond Calculations APPENDIX C Soil Study Page 12 Engineer's Report Rye Brook New York 18 Hillandole Road A. Introduction This report has been prepared in support of proposed improvements to the property at 18 Hallindale Road, Rye Brook NY.The report and associated plans were prepared in accordance with the Westchester County, NY,Stormwater Management Best Management Practices for Stormwater Runoff Control in compliance with the requirements of the Village of Rye Brook pursuant to Storm Water Control Permit.The existing conditions identified on the site plan were taken from a survey prepared by Aristotle Bournazos PC dated September 15,2006. B. Existing Conditions The existing property is a 44,478 sf residentially zoned property.The property is developed with an existing two-story home,deck,walks,and driveway,the balance being lawn and landscaping.The subject properties topography can be described as moderately sloping from north to south across the property.Stormwater from landscaped areas leaves the property in an overland fashion,it is understood that the existing impervious areas are piped to an onsite infiltration area;the location of that system is understood to be in the area of the proposed pool footprint and will need to be re-established in an alternate location. Percolation tests and deeps were conducted,the results are provided on the plans.The soils on the property in the area of the proposed rain garden are a Paxton complex PnC with a Hydraulic soil group Type"C". The area of impervious cover for the existing condition was determined to be 7,290 sf.The total volume of runoff resulting from the 25 Year storm event was calculated at 13,617cf.These values are provided for reference only and are not utilized in a pre vs post condition analysis. C. Proposed Condition The proposed condition includes a rear yard in ground pool and patio.The grading as proposed leaves the existing yard grading essentially untouched and thereby leaving the existing drainage patterns unchanged. As stated previously the pool footprint conflicts with the existing infiltration system,therefore that system will be removed and replaced.The design evaluation to size stormwater mitigation is based on the entire area of impervious area post development inclusive of the existing impervious area to remain.The proposed condition impervious area was computed to be 9,610 sf.The total volume of runoff for the proposed condition impervious areas was calculated at 4,558 cf The on-site drainage has been designed to provide full mitigation for all impervious areas for the 25 Year Storm Event(6.5").The design proposes a detention basin with a volume of 5,026 cf. Piping from the existing impervious areas will be rerouted to the proposed pond along with drainage from the pool deck. The detention system has been sized such that the entire volume of runoff from the existing and newly created impervious areas during the design storm is completely detained/infiltrated. D. Construction Phasing Plan and Sediment and Erosion Control Management Maintenance of Temporary and Permanent Structures and Practices Temporary and permanent erosion controls measures will be maintained and inspected in accordance with the Grading and Drainage Plan.All proposed soil erosion and sediment control practices are designed in accordance with the following publications: Page 13 Engineers Report Rye Brook,New York 18 W f ondale Rona o New York State Standards and Specifications for Erosion and Sediment Control,August 2005, latest edition. o New York State Guidelines for Urban Erosion and Sediment Control, latest edition, o New York State General Permit for Stormwater Discharges, o "Reducing the Impacts of Stormwater Runoff from New Development",as published by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC),second edition,April 1993. The proposed soil erosion and sediment control devices include: protective earthmoving procedures and grading practices,soil stabilization, inlet protection,stabilized construction entrance and silt fencing. The approach of the plan is to control off-site sedimentation,and re-establish vegetation as soon as practicable. Construction shall be implemented in the following order: 1. Erosion and sediment control(ESC) measures and Pollution Prevention (PP) implementation, a) Install silt fences along easterly project limits, b) Maintain existing macadam driveway to utilize as a site construction entrance to the project area, material storage area and dumpster location. i) Contractor shall install stone stabilized entrance at end of the existing paved driveway in advance of construction vehicles requiring access from graded/exposed soils to City Streets. c) Install Tree Protection d) install temporary sanitary facilities(portable toilets)in a location that is at least 20 from any drainage facility or flow path. Recommend staking the facility to prevent accidental tipping by construction activity or wind. e) Install waste container—maintain rigorous site cleaning schedule to prevent debris from blowing off site. Construction waste shall be stored in a dumpster and carried off-site on a regular basis f) Demolish existing structures g) Allocate concrete washout areas 2. Clearing and grubbing. a) Strip topsoil and stockpile. Initiate cover practices and sediment controls at the base of the stockpile.Stockpile can be temporarily stabilized with tarp or mulch and/or temporary seeding. b) Disturbed areas where construction will cease for more than 14 days will be stabilized with erosion controls,such hydro-seeding,hydro-mulch,or hay 3. Excavate Pool a) Install dewatering practice if necessary. 4. Install detention pond and plant per the landscape plan by others. 5. Final stabilization of disturbed areas a) Install minimum 4"topsoil and final stabilize with lawn or mulch in landscape areas. b) Remove all ESC and PP measures upon approval of design engineer and/or ESC inspector. Awarded contractor shall be responsible for the proper implementation of the ESC and PP practices.The following maintenance program is proposed in order to maintain the proper function of all drainage and erosion and sediment control facilities: o Inspect sediment control devices and construction access point routinely and if necessary, remove accumulated sedimentation and debris;at no point should the filter bed be allowed to continue operations beyond 50%of its capacity being compromised by debris. o All disturbed area will be stabilized and the sediment build-up in the filter removed.After the construction is completed,any areas disturbed shall be stabilized immediately after the required work is completed. Page 14 Engineer's Report Rye Brook New York 18 Hillandale Road o Restore and re-seed any eroded areas as soon as possible o The Stormwater Management Facilities Maintenance Program will be managed by the home owner and shall include removal of sediment from the detention pond facilities. The contractor shall provide a Trained Individual to be present on site at all times during soil disturbing activities Any disturbed areas shall be re-vegetated as soon as possible.Topsoil shall be temporarily stockpiled for future use in grading and landscaping.Stockpile locations have been provided on the Erosion and Sediment Control Plan and shall be contained within a silt fence/hay bale barrier. The existing driveway shall be maintained throughout construction to be utilized for the site construction entrance.A temporary stabilized construction entrance comprised of a stone anti-track pad shall be installed as necessary to minimize dirt tracking.The purpose of a stabilized entrance is to remove as much soil from the construction vehicle tires prior to exiting the site and traveling on the existing roadways. For dewatering activities during excavation of the pool,a dewatering pump shall be located in a perforated tub surrounded by filter fabric and stone(or approved alternative). Clean discharge should be directed to onsite drainage appurtenances to minimize erosion of soils. Discharge with suspended sediment shall be connected to a sediment bag on undisturbed ground in a location where the discharge will not cause erosion or flow over exposed soils. If the contractor encounters ground water during the excavation of the filtering system, he shall notify the design engineer immediately.The contractor shall store all excavated material at the designated location show on the Grading and Erosion Control Plan with the appropriate erosion control measures corresponding to the stockpile detail. Contractor shall be responsible for maintaining the cleanliness of the streets (driveways/parking and adjacent areas)and storm drain inlet protection (as applicable) Best Management Practices(BMPs) throughout the construction project. Permanent seeding shall be installed immediately after the final design grades are achieved but no later than fourteen(14)days after construction activities have ceased.After stabilization,accumulated sediment shall be removed from site for disposal along with construction debris,trash and temporary BMPs E. Condusion: T1ie irnplenientation of this storm-water iiidndgeiiiCiit Nidii Will IIIiugdie`u`ie Nusi uevelupiii01L siviiiiwdtei flows and not adversely affect the adjacent properties or the existing drainage system. The stormwater runoff generated by the proposed addition has been attenuated by the construction of an underground storage system. Page 15 SUQIJDln-21nj ua►jrpuoj pasodar.4 d XIGN3ddV PDDH aIDPUDIIIH 8I -VOA MaIV-y ao q aAH vdday kjaaUjBu3 is Proposea Subcat) [Rea �Ofl Link Routing Diagram for Proposed 71/ j Prepared by Microsoft, Printed 1/1 412 0 2 1 HydroCADJ 10-00-20 s/n 09858 �)2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Proposed Prepared by Microsoft Printed 1/14/2021 HydroCAD910.00-20 s/n 09858 02017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae 2 Area Listing (all nodes) Area CN Description (sq-ft) (subcatchment-numbers) 9,610 98 Paved parking, HSG C (1S) 9,610 98 TOTAL AREA Proposed Prepared by Microsoft Printed 1/14/2021 HydroCAD910.00-20 s/n 09858 02017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 3 Sail Listing (all nodes) Area Soil Subcatchment (sq-ft) Group Numbers 0 HSG A 0 HSG B 9,610 HSG C 1 S 0 HSG D 0 Other 9,610 TOTAL AREA Proposed Type 111 24-hr 25 Tear Rainfall=6.40" Prepared by MicrusuTt Plinied 1/14i2021 HydroCAD® 10.00-20 s/n 09858 ©2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 4 Summary for Subcatchment 1S: Proposed Runoff = 1.05 cfs @ 12.20 hrs, Volume- 4,558 cf, Depth> 5.69" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs. dt= 0.05 hrs Type III 24-hr 25 Tear Rainfall=6.40" Area (sf) CN Description 9,610 98 Paved parking, HSG C 9,610 i vu.uU o i1nNefviuus Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment 1S: Proposed Hydrograph 1.05 cfs ! Runoff 1 Type III 24-hr 25 Tear Rainfall=6.40" Runoff Area=9,610 sf Runoff Volume=4,558 cf Runoff Depth>5.69" U- Tc=15.0 min CN=98 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) Proposed Type l//24-hr 25 Tear Rainfall=6.40" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 1/14/2021 HydroCAD®10.00-20 s/n 09858 ©2017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae 5 Hydrograph for Subcatchment 1S: Proposed Time Precip. Excess Runoff Time Precip. Excess Runoff (hours) (inches) (inches) (cfs) (hours) (inches) (inches) (Cfs) 5.00 0.36 0.20 0.02 7.65 0.67 0.48 0.03 5.05 0.37 0.20 0.02 7.70 0.68 0.49 0.03 5.10 0.37 0.21 0.02 7.75 0.69 0.49 0.03 5.15 0.38 0.21 0.02 7.80 0.70 0.50 0.03 5.20 0.38 0.21 0.02 7.85 0.70 0.51 0.03 5.25 0.39 0.22 0.02 7.90 0.71 0.52 0.03 5.30 0.39 0.22 0.02 7.95 0.72 0.52 0.03 5.35 0.40 0.23 0.02 8.00 0.73 0.53 0.03 5.40 0.40 0.23 0.02 8.05 0.74 0.54 0.03 5.45 0.41 0.23 0.02 8.10 0.75 0.55 0.03 5.50 0.41 0.24 0.02 8.15 0.76 0.56 0.03 5.55 0.42 0.24 0.02 8.20 0.76 0.56 0.04 5.60 0.42 0.25 0.02 8.25 0.77 0.57 0.04 5.65 0.43 0.25 0.02 8.30 0.78 0.58 0.04 5.70 0.43 0.26 0.02 8.35 0.79 0.59 0.04 5.75 0.44 0.26 0.02 8.40 0.80 0.60 0.04 5.80 0.44 0.26 0.02 8.45 0.81 0.61 0.04 5.85 0.45 0.27 0.02 8.50 0.82 0.62 0.04 5.90 0.45 0.27 0.02 8.55 0.83 0.63 0.04 5.95 0.46 0.28 0.02 8.60 0.84 0.64 0.04 6.00 0.46 0.28 0.02 8.65 0.85 0.65 0.04 6.05 0.47 0.29 0.02 8.70 0.86 0.66 0.04 6.10 0.47 0.29 0.02 8.75 0.88 0.67 0.04 6.15 0.48 0.30 0.02 8.80 0.89 0.68 0.04 6.20 0.48 0.30 0.02 8.85 0.90 0.69 0.05 6.25 0.49 0.31 0.02 8.90 0.91 0.70 0.05 6.30 0.49 0.31 0.02 8.95 0.92 0.71 0.05 6.35 0.50 0.32 0.02 9.00 0.93 0.73 0.05 6.40 0.50 0.32 0.02 9.05 0.94 0.74 0.05 6.45 0.51 0.33 0.02 9.10 0.96 0.75 0.05 6.50 0.52 0.33 0.02 9.15 0.97 0.76 0.05 6.55 0.52 0.34 0.02 9.20 0.98 0.77 0.05 6.60 0.53 0.34 0.02 9.25 1.00 0.79 0.05 6.65 0.53 0.35 0.02 9.30 1.01 0.80 0.05 6.70 0.54 0.35 0.02 9.35 1.02 0.81 0.05 6.76 0.55 0.36 0.02 9.40 1.03 0.82 0.05 6.80 0.55 0.37 0.02 9.45 1.05 0.84 0.06 6.85 0.56 0.37 0.02 9.50 1.06 0.85 0.06 6.90 0.57 0.38 0.03 9.55 1.08 0.86 0.06 6.95 0.57 0.38 0.03 9.60 1.09 0.88 0.06 7.00 0.58 0.39 0.03 9.65 1.10 0.89 0.06 7.05 0.59 0.40 0.03 9.70 1.12 0.91 0.06 7.10 0.59 0.40 0.03 9.75 1.13 0.92 0.06 7.15 0.60 0.41 0.03 9.80 1.15 0.94 0.06 7.20 0.61 0.42 0.03 9.85 1.16 0.95 0.06 7.25 0.61 0.42 0.03 9.90 1.18 0.96 0.06 7.30 0.62 0.43 0.03 9.95 1.19 0.98 0.06 7.35 0.63 0.44 0.03 10.00 1.21 1.00 0.06 7.40 0.64 0.44 0.03 10.05 1.23 1.01 0.07 7.45 0.64 0.45 0.03 10.10 1.24 1.03 0.07 7,50 0.65 0.46 0.03 10.15 1.26 1.04 0.07 1.55 v.6fi 0.4v v.v3 iv.2v i.2Fi i_06 v.v7 7.60 0.67 0.47 0.03 I 10.25 1.29 1.08 0,07 90'0 9E'9 69'9 99'9L 9L'0 L917 9L't? 06'ZL 90,0 K's 89,9 09-9L LL'0 61717 ZL'b 98ZL 90'0 ££'9 L9'9 9ti'9L 6L'0 9b'b 69'17 08'ZL 90'0 Z£'9 99'9 Otr'9L 2'0 £ti'b 9917 9L'ZL 90'0 LE'9 99'9 9£'9L trZ'0 Oti'ti E917 OL'ZL 90'0 0£'9 V9'9 0£'9L 6Z'O 9£'t? 09'17 99'ZL 90'0 6Z'9 Z9'9 9Z'9L 9E'0 £E'b L917 09'ZL 90'0 8Z'9 L9"9 OZ'9L LVO 6Z't? £917 99'ZL 90'0 9Z'9 09'9 9L'9L OVO 9Z't? 61?'V 09'ZL 90'0 9Z,9 617"9 OL'9L 99'0 LZ'b 9tl'b 9b'ZL 90'0 t?Z'9 8ti'9 90,9L V9,0 9Vir 6E'17 Ot?'ZL 90'0 £Z'9 Lb'9 00'9L trL'0 90'17 ZE'tr 9£'ZL 90'0 ZZ'9 9ti'9 9614 98,0 66'E EZ17 0E'ZL 90'0 LZ'9 W9 0614 66'0 68'E £L'b 9Z'ZL 90'0 6L'9 £b'9 9814 90'L OLT L0'17 OZZL 90,0 8L'9 Zf7,9 OS'tiL 00'L 99'£ 88'E 9VU 90'0 L L'9 017'9 9L'K £8'0 09'E trL'E O L ZL 90"0 9L'9 W9 OL14 99'0 6Z'£ E9'E 90'ZL 90'0 17V9 8E'9 99,14 Z9'0 L6'Z OZ'E 00'ZL 90'0 E L'9 L£'9 09'14 917'0 179Z LSZ 96'l L 90'0 L L'9 9E'9 99'14 6£'0 EV'Z 99Z 06'L L LO'O 0L'9 b£"9 0917t £E'0 6Z'Z Z9Z 9O LL LO'O 60'9 ZE'9 91714 9Z'0 9 L'Z 6£'Z 08'L L LO'O L0*9 L£'9 017,14 EZ'O 90'Z LZZ 9L'L L LO'O 90'9 OV9 9C14 6L'0 961 LlZ OL'LL LO'O 170'9 8Z"9 WK L L'0 98'l 80Z 99'L L L0'0 £03 LZ'9 9Z'14 9L'0 6L'L LOZ 09'LL LO'O L03 9Z'9 OZ'bL trVo £L'L 96'L 99'L L LO'O 00'9 tiZ'9 9 L17L b L'0 89'L L6'L 09'L L LO'O 96't;, ZZ'9 O V1 L £L'0 99'l L8'l 917'L L 80,0 L6'ti 2,9 90,14 CVO L9,L E8'L Ot?'L L 90'0 9617 6 L'9 00'14 Z L'0 99'L 09'L 9E'L L 80'0 176'V L L'9 96'£L L L'0 V9'L LL'L OE'L L 80'0 Z617 9V9 06TL LL'0 L9'l IrfL 9Z'LL 80'0 06'17 14,9 98'£L OL'0 WL Ul OZ'LL 80'0 6817 Z L'9 OS'£L 0 L'0 9b'L 89*L 9 L'L L 60'0 Lffti LV9 9L'EL 0L'0 Eb'L 99'l 0 V L L 60'0 98'17 603 OL' L 0 L"0 Oti'L Z9'L 90'l L 60'0 E8'17 LO'9 99'£L 60'0 Be*L 09'L 00'L L 60'0 Z917 90'9 09'£L 60'0 9£'L 99'L 96'0 L 60'0 08'17 E0,9 99'EL 60'0 EE'L 99*L 06'0 L 60'0 8L'17 LO'9 09'E L 60'0 LE'L £9'L 98'0 L 0Vo 9L,17 66'17 We 60'0 6Z'L L9'L 08'OL OL'0 tiL'b L631 Ob"£L 60,0 LZ'L 6171 9L'OL 0 L'0 ZL'b 96'b W£L 80'0 9Z'L Lti'L OL'0 L 0 L O Oft, E6'b OE'E L 80'0 £Z'L 9b'L 99'0l L L'0 89'17 L6'ti 9Z,£L 80'0 LZ'L Eb'L 09'0 L L L'0 99'17 6817 OZ'£L 80'0 6l'L Lt?'L 99'0 L ZL'0 E917 L8'17 9L'EL 80,0 LL'L 6£'L 09,0L ZL'0 L9'17 99'17 OL'EL 80'0 9l'L L£'L 9t?'OL £V0 6917 ZS-b 90'S L LO'O E L'L 9£'L Ot?'O L t7L'0 9917 09'17 00'EL LO'O L L'L EE'L 9E'0 L 9 L'0 v9'v 8LT 96'Z L LO'O 60'L LE'L OE'O L sP saypu± sayoui slnoy W savour W—P- s7noy l;oun�r M=3 -dr)aJd awil rUounb ssaox3 •droaJd awrl (penuguoo) posodad :% Womloleogng job ydejBojpAH 9 a ed 011 suognIoS aJBMUOS adOaP H L LOZ© M60 u/s OZ-00'0 L SGVOOJP H LZOVKIL Paluud l}osoaoiyy Aq paiedaJd „0#'9=llejure8Jea19Z f4-PZlllGdAl posodad Proposed Type 111 24-hr 25 Tear Rainfall=6.40" Prepared by Microsoft Printed 1/14/2021 HydroCAD910.00-20 s/n 09858 02017 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 7 Hydrograph for Subcatchment 1S: Proposed (continued) Time Precip. Excess Runoff Time Precip. Excess Runoff (hours) (inches) (inches) (cfs) (hours) (inches) (inches) (Cfs) 15.60 5.60 5.36 0.05 18.25 5.96 5.73 0.02 15.65 5.61 5.37 0.05 18.30 5.97 5.73 0.02 15.70 5.62 5.38 0.05 18.35 5.97 5.74 0.02 15.75 5.63 5.39 0.04 18.40 5.98 5.74 0.02 15.80 5.64 5.40 0.04 18.45 5.98 5.75 0.02 15.85 5.64 5.41 0.04 18.50 5.99 5.75 0.02 15.90 5.65 5.42 0.04 18.55 5.99 5.76 0.02 15.95 5.66 5.42 0.04 18.60 6.00 5.76 0.02 16.00 5.67 5.43 0.04 18.65 6.00 5.77 0.02 16.05 5.68 5.44 0.04 18.70 6.01 5.77 0.02 16.10 5.69 5.45 0.04 18.75 6.01 5.78 0.02 16.15 5.69 5.46 0.04 18.80 6.02 5.78 0.02 16.20 5.70 5.47 0.04 18.85 6.02 5.78 0.02 16.25 5.71 5.47 0.04 18.90 6.03 5.79 0.02 16.30 5.72 5.48 0.04 18.95 6.03 5.79 0.02 16.35 5.73 5.49 0.04 19.00 6.04 5.80 0.02 16.40 5.73 5.50 0.04 19.05 6.04 5.80 0.02 16.45 5.74 5.50 0.04 19.10 6.05 5.81 0.02 16.50 5.75 5.51 0.04 19.15 6.05 5.81 0.02 16.55 5.76 5.52 0.03 19.20 6.06 5.82 0.02 16.60 5.76 5.53 0.03 19.25 6.06 5.82 0.02 16.65 5.77 5.53 0.03 19.30 6.06 5.83 0.02 16.70 5.78 5.54 0.03 19.35 6.07 5.83 0.02 16.75 5.79 5.55 0.03 19.40 6.07 5.83 0.02 16.80 5.79 5.56 0.03 19.45 6.08 5.84 0.02 16.85 5.80 5.56 0.03 19.50 6.08 5.84 0.02 16.90 5.81 5.57 0.03 19.55 6.09 5.85 0.02 16.95 5.81 5.58 0.03 19.60 6.09 5.85 0.02 17.00 5.82 5.58 0.03 19.65 6.10 5.86 0.02 17.05 5.83 5.59 0.03 19.70 6.10 5.86 0.02 17.10 5.83 5.60 0.03 19.75 6.10 5.87 0.02 17.15 5.84 5.60 0.03 19.80 6.11 5.87 0.02 17.20 5.85 5.61 0.03 19.85 6.11 5.87 0.02 17.25 5.85 5.62 0.03 19.90 6.12 5.88 0.02 17.30 5.86 5.62 0.03 19.95 6.12 5.88 0.02 17.35 5.87 5.63 0.03 20.00 6.12 5.89 0.02 17.40 5.87 5.63 0.03 17.45 5.88 5.64 0.03 17.50 5.88 5.65 0.03 17.55 5.89 5.65 0.03 17.60 5.90 5.66 0.03 17.65 5.90 5.66 0.03 17.70 5.91 5.67 0.03 17.75 5.91 5.67 0.03 17.80 5.92 5.68 0.03 17.85 5.92 5.69 0.03 17.90 5.93 5.69 0.03 17.95 5.93 5.70 0.02 18.00 5.94 5.70 0.02 18.05 5.94 5.71 0.02 18.10 5.95 5.71 0.02 18.15 5.95 5.72 0.02 18.20 5.96 5.72 0.02 I Engineer's Report Rye Brook,New York 18 Hillandale Road APPENDIX 8 Pond Volume Calculations o ZCO CSC. 2 Aanjn.0 AQfi 3 XION3dd V PDOl1 a1DPUWUHOr k \ / ` _s _ w _ 4t,� _ _ _ _ is e4OF31r- 2 \. . . � . � . . . � z_3C'» �\ j } < � So ( e f � B 7 � w = , f ` £ ? � \ § ` ƒ 2 / ƒ ƒ e \� \ _ z 4 2 ; \ / to k 2 k 2 § 2 mw «mo, < » � ° w \) « _s _ ._ _ _ _ 45425M _ _ / \ Soil Map—Westchester County,New York Map Unit Legend Map unit Sr" Map Unit Name Acres in At7I �eepnC�AOI PnC Paxton fine sandy loam,8 to 0.7 80.7% 15 percent slopes WdA Woodbridge loam,0 to 3 02 19.3% percent slopes Totals for Area of Interest 0.8 100.0% usDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 1/14/2021 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3 BUILDING DEPARTMENT VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK 938 KING STREET RYE BROOK,NY 10573 DEC 2 3 2020 (914)939-0668 FAX(914)939-5801 wwwxyebrook.org FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: BOT Approval Date: PB Approval Date:p?/� � } 3I��,a�a BOT Disapproval Date: PB Disapproval Date: /� Attach Resolution Hereto: BOT[ ] PB[ ZBA[ ] Chairman: r V SITE PLAN FEE: %� .U!5 DATE PAID: 3 Oaa ENVIRONMENTAL FEE: DATE PAID: OTHER: .i ' aAk d- 1.2 a *********************************************************************************************************** APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL Submission of this application does not assure placement on any Planning Board Agenda.The Applicant will be notified of such placement. *********************************************************************************************************** This application references but is not limited to the following sections of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook;§250 ZONING,§209 SITE PLAN REVIEW,§235 TREES,§107 DEMOLITION OF BUILDINGS,§224 SWIMMING POOLS,§121 EXCAVATION&TOPSOIL REMOVAL, §118 EROSION&SEDIMENT CONTROL, §213 STEEP SLOPES PROTECTION, §219 SUBDIVISION OF LAND, §250-40 NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS. Applicants and their Design Professionals are strongly advised to review the above mentioned code sections online at, www.ryebrook.org prior to completing and/or submitting this application. APPLICATION FEE SCHEDULE: Residential Dwellings- $325.00,plus$200.00 per additional dwelling unit. Non-Residential Buildings- $475.00,plus $30.00 per parking space. Planned Unit Development-$600.00,per acre PUD Amendment- $300.00 Site Plan Amendment- $575.00 Wetlands&Watercourse- $1,150.00,permit$250.00 Consultant Review(Escrow)Fee: Minimum fee$250.00-maximum fee$2,500.00 to be determined by the Village Engineer. Application fees are non-refundable. The applicant's Escrow Account must have a positive balance at all times prior to any Consultant,Attorney, or Village review. Escrow Fees and Site Plan Fees must be paid on separate checks made payable to the Village of Rye Brook. *********************************************************************************************************** 1. Site Address: 14r_� kIL.IR"L.E 14b Parcel ID#: 153.2B-1-NZone: 9.-2.5 2. Property Owner:T)PILAJ EL J&Af►ZV S Address: 1g µILUNj E-Mail:l_r Q.hAA1ZICS 1-5 C? L-COIM Tel.#:Q14-115-ylfpl Other: 3. Applicant:D(�6iys_cSHE7ZkmA" Address:y g$oftUA)eN 90M t Cj ice► N--j E-Mail:DBU.npjo,,�VjMt-AJLP Wt5CAD4r_(Z E1Y*%1L•CCYyr Tel.#: a1L1-62_4-0�Pq Other: 4. Design Professional:S)C­�QJL--L, Address: E-Mail: it Tel.#: Other: 5. Designate to whom correspondence is to be sent: T�t►.111=1 b1 E1ZY�/W�IJ Note: If applicant is a"Contract Vendee",please attach a copy of the contract summary with financial and confidential terms deleted. 1 6/1/2020 6. Street which property abuts: Y-k 6 S- 7. Does property connect directly into State or County highway? W NO ( )YES: 8. Is site within 500 feet of Village Boundary?(*NO ( )YES If yes note all bordering municipalities: 9. Total area of site: yy, LA(q I Area of site activity: 2►(0 10. Site coverage: 22 %; Building coverage: q % 11. Existing building size: - New/additional building size: 12. Existing parking spaces: - New parking spaces: 13. Nature of proposed activity: PaDaAm IQ-C-QQQup �IMM►�G k�lJL� OC6=-opyrn, sTt).-E ****************************************************************************************** Please note that this application must include the notarized signature(s) of the legal owner(s) of the above-mentioned property, in the space provided below.Any application not bearing the legal property owner's notarized signature(s)shall be deemed null and void,and will be returned to the applicant. *********************************************************************************************************** jD ATE OF NEW W YYO COUNTY QF WESTCHESTER ) as: t✓V / being duly sworn, deposes and states that he/she is the applicant above named, (pr t name of individual signing as the applicant) and further states that (s)he isle legal owner of the property to which this application pertains, or that (s)he is the for the legal owner and is duly authorized to make and file this application. architect,contractor,agent,attorney,etc.) That all statements contained herein are true to the best of his/her knowledge and belief,and that any work performed,or use conducted at the above captioned property will be in conformance with the details as set forth and contained in this application and in any accompanying approved plans and specifications,as well as in accordance with the New York State Uniform Fire Prevention&Building Code,the Code of the Village of Rye Brook and all other applicable laws,ordinances and regulations. Sworn to before me this Sworn to before me this day of a w20 day of o Pub c OnrintNameof c mature f Property Owner p tcant Print Name of Property Owner Applicant 2 611/2020 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK 938 King Street,Rye Brook,N.Y. 10573 DEC 2 3 2020 (914)939-0753 Fax(914)939-5801 www.rvc&ook.org SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REVIEW CHECKLIST This form shall serve as a checklist for site plan submittal and review by the Village of Rye Brook. The use of this plan review checklist by the applicant is to ensure compliance with the technical provisions of§209 of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook entitled, Site Plan Review, pertaining to preliminary and final plan preparation. The Village Code is available on the Village Website at: www.ryebrook.org. Prior to the appearance before ANY meeting or hearing of the Planning Board,the applicant must comply with all Notification Requirements of Code Section 250-40. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL SHALL INCLUDE: 1. APPLICATIONS. Completed and signed including correspondences. 2. CHECKLIST. Completed and signed. 3. PLANS. Signed, Sealed & Dated. Four paper (4) copies and one (1) electronic version. One (1) record set with original signatures, dates and seals shall be provided and submitted with two (2) copies that clearly indicate the signatures, dates,and seals shown on the record set. 4. FEES: All application fees and Environmental fee. A separate check for filing fee and Environmental fee. 5. Environmental Assessment Form. Form available on the NYS DEC website and mapper. 6. Electronic Copy. Complete copy of all plans and shall be submitted electronically at time of submission. 7. Not of Sign Posting&Mail Notification. ta ' ed a ' I, (Applicant's signature)have read the Notification Requirements of Co ctlbn 250-40 and will provide notification as required. IDENTIFICATION OF APPLICANT(S): Identification of Applicant:�4k 4l _ Si-IdWP Q Applicant:�l1a z--IECLI SRO LftJoam for Address: 4 awamnPq ,Wmet %Q.-4AUWL A UJy imQ5 Tel. #:G1L1-?Z",CQD1C1 Fax:Qltl-Z2N•OZ.SI E-Mail:Op,&J pq j_,*JeR1vVtL) Aw UA1M-- J 6emon,�,,, Project Name: MAJLML 1►�OJCE Project Address: 1!2S 0111P11.Y`l'1lF I-Zo Current Property Owner:tJNyJ►Ia_ ►.A�qQ� Address:i?) 411LU1%np_z 1Z.h RyEJ ?CX�1L bJN Tel. #:q lU-11",5-31101 Fax: E-Mail:tPju 1.MARKS 4J5 P C�yY',01 L.CCl`n IDENTIFICATION OF PROPERTY: Identifying Title: Tax Designation: Section: I Block: Lot: 3CI Zoning District:Q-2_5 Street which property abuts: 1.I06 5V Plan Submission Date: 1217 31 7o Site Plan Checklist Page 1 of 7 6/l/2020 Project Address g �AJLAJAtj()r—VL"—IZ,Q Y N NA PLAN REQUIREMENTS O O O 4 copies of plans prepared and signed by a registered Land Surveyor,Engineer or Architect. O O O One(1)electronic copy of all submitted plans and surveys. O O O Topographic Survey stamped by New York State Land Surveyor with license number and seal. O O O Topographic survey scale of one(1)inch per twenty(20)feet or larger. O O O Section, block and lot numbers of the property taken from the latest tax records along with a copy of the most recent property card on file with the Town of Rye Tax Assessor's office. O O O Name of the proposed subdivision plan. O O O Name and address of the owner of record. O O O Name and address of the applicant. O O O Deed reference(s). O O O Names, addresses and signature of every Engineer, Architect, Land Surveyor or Soil Scientist whose professional seal appears on any site plan submitted to the Board. O O O North arrow and scale. O O O Location map at the minimum scale of 1"equals 1,000 feet. O O O Area of all lots,in square feet. O O O Engineering notes on plans as stated in application packages. O O O Copies of all existing and proposed deed restrictions or covenants applying to the property, including, but not limited to, covenants and agreements restricting the use and establishing future ownership and maintenance responsibilities for all private roads,recreation,and open space areas. O O O Any prior land use approvals with respect to the subject property. 000 Date the plans were first drafted. Any revision(s)made to any of the sheets first submitted are to be so noted in the revision block. The revision block is to be placed on the originals of the revised sheets. Additional paper copies are to be made& submitted for the Planning Board&Building Dept.to replace those sheets previously submitted. O O O Other existing site improvements,including,but not limited to,fences,landscape or retaining walls,landscaping & screening. 000 Location of all buildings and structures on the premises and approximate location of all neighboring buildings or structures within 100 feet of the lot line. O O O Fees paid to The Village of Rye Brook Building Department. O O O Any revisions to plans shall be identified with a revision cloud and numbered revision triangle Y N NA ABUTTING PROPERTY INFORMATION O O O The names and addresses of all abutting property owners within 250 ft as indicated in the Municipal records. O O O Zoning and use of abutting properties noted on plans. O O O Shape,size,height and location of existing buildings and driveways within one hundred(100)feet of the site. O O O Location and description of existing easements within one hundred(100)feet of the site. O O O Location of existing private or public trails within one hundred(100)feet of the site. O O O Location of existing roads,scenic roads and/or driveways within two hundred(200)feet of the site. O O O Location of proposed parkland. If none state nearest recreation facility O O O Location of existing septic system leach fields within two hundred(200)feet of the site. O O O Locations,dimensions,grades and flow direction of existing sewers,culverts,waterlines as well as other underground utilities within and adjacent to the property. Site Plan Checklist Page 2 of 7 6/l/2020 Project Address O O O The location of all existing watercourses,intermittent streams,wetland areas and springs,consistent with the definitions set forth in Chapter 245,Wetlands and Watercourses,of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook. V N NA PROPOSED SITE PLAN INFORMATION O O O Sufficient, acceptable information to readily determine the location, bearing, and length of every street line, lot line, and property boundary line. O O O Location of all building setback lines. O O O Topographic data at a minimum contour interval of 2'-0"increments,showing existing and proposed contours on the property and extending a minimum of 25 feet into all adjacent properties. O O O The location and characteristics of the different areas of vegetation,including the identification of all individual trees 12 or more inches in diameter at breast height("DBH"),protected trees of any size,as well as stands of trees and wooded areas, within areas of proposed disturbance, consistent with the provisions of Chapter 235, Trees, of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook. O O O Location and proposed development of all buffer areas,including existing vegetative cover. O O O Location and description of any zoning district and municipal boundaries including a zoning compliance chart for the existing and proposed lots. O O O Shape,size,height and location of all existing and proposed buildings. O O O Location and description of any existing and proposed easements. O O O Location and dimensions of all existing and proposed streets,driveways,sidewalks,parking spaces,bicycle parking, loading areas and other facilities associated with the proposed use. O O O Identification of the location and amount of building area proposed for retail sales or similar commercial activity. O O O Location of existing and proposed utilities(water,sewer,gas,electrical,telephone,oil tank etc.). O O O Design and location of all existing and proposed wells,septic tanks and leach field systems,or methods of waste water disposal. O O O Location,type and size of all existing and proposed landscaping and screening including fences and walls. O O O Location,size and proposed screening of outdoor storage areas,if any. O O O Location, design and construction material of all existing or proposed site improvements, including drains, culverts, retaining walls,landscape walls and fences. O O O Exterior lighting plan and proposed signs to be located on site,including sign orientation,size,height,and elevation view. O O O Storm drainage plan and plans for snow removal and storage. O O O Pedestrian and automobile circulation plan. O O O Construction drawings for pavements,walks,steps,curbing,drainage&other structures associated with the proposed use. O O O Erosion and sedimentation control plan,including installation details of proposed control measures,directive construction notations and a schedule for the installation and maintenance of proposed control measure. O O O Description of measures planned to assure proper erosion and sedimentation control in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 118 entitled"Erosion and Sediment Control,"of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook. O O O Drawing and computation for storm water detention design for a 25-year storm in accordance with the Westchester County Best Management Practices O O O Rock outcroppings and areas of steep slope consistent with the definitions set forth in Chapter 213,Steep Slope Protection, of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook. O O O Location of any common lands and/or public lands. O O O Phasing or an estimated project construction schedule. O O O Supporting documents,including deeds,maintenance,condominium agreements,etc. Site Plan Checklist Page 3 of 7 6/1/2020 Project Address 000 Location of proposed construction or area of disturbance and its relationship to any property line, easement, building, structure, road, wall, fence, sewage disposal system, well, wetland feature or tree exceeding six inches in diameter measured at a height of four feet from the ground O O O Estimate of earthwork showing the quantity of any material to be imported to and/or removed from the site including a chart with the number/species and size of any trees to be removed. O O O Location and size of areas of soils by soil types in the area of proposed disturbance and to a distance of 100 feet surrounding the area of disturbance. O O O Cross sections of steep slope areas. O O O Retaining walls or like constructions,with details of construction. O O O Approximate boundaries of any areas subject to flooding or stormwater overflows, including areas of special flood hazard and coastal high-hazard areas, consistent with the definitions set forth in Chapter 130, Flood Damage Prevention, of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook.Approximate Wetlands and wetland buffer boundaries shall be clearly delineated. O O O Location of fire and other emergency zones,including the location of fire hydrants. O O O Studies to include,but not necessarily limited to: environmental impact analysis,wildlife,traffic,stormwater management,recreation,public service,fiscal impact,visual impact and historic significance documentation,or a written request to waive the submission requirements for these studies. O O O Amount of any bonds required. O O O Amount of excavated material to be removed from site,if any. Y N NA OTHER(as applicable) O O O Record of application for and approval status of all necessary permits from state and county officials and local utility companies. O O O Identification of any federal,state or county permits required for the project's execution,including project referrals, if any,&environmental review procedures mandated by Article 8,Environmental Quality Review,of the Environmental Conservation Law(SEQRA). O O O Any other information felt necessary by the Planning Board to allow the Board to proceed with consideration&to make an informed decision. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CHECKLIST WESTCHESTER COUNTY PLANNING BOARD Notice to Applicants/Developers: At some point during the development review process your project may be referred to the Westchester County Planning Board for review and comment in accordance with state and county laws that require local planning boards, zoning boards of appeals and governing bodies to refer certain development applications to the County Planning Board. Referral to the County Planning Board may not occur until your project has progressed well along through the design process. Since the Planning Board's comments may impact project design, this checklist is provided to encourage early consideration of these areas of concern by applicants to avoid project changes later. For information on the County Planning Board review process and to access an electronic copy of this checklist, go online to www.westchestergov.com/planningreferrals or contact Lukas Herbert at lah5@westchestergov.com. I.COUNTY PLANNING BOARD POLICIES: Written policies underlie all recommendations of the County Planning Board. Westchester 2025-Context for County and Municipal Planning and Policies to Guide County Planning,adopted by the County Planning Board on 5/6/08,amended 115110,can be found at ww.westchestergov.com/2025. ❑Westchester 2025: Policies should be reviewed to determine how they relate to the development proposal. II.IMPACTS TO COUNTY FACILITIES AND SERVICES: The County Planning Board coordinates the review of development projects with Westchester County departments to identify and address potential impacts on County services and infrastructure.In some situations,permits and approvals may be required that could change project design. Site Plan Checklist Page 4 of 7 6/1/2020 Project Address ❑ Map of County Facilities: Review the State & County Roads and Parks map (which also includes county channel lines)to identify proximity to County facilities at: www.westchestergov.con/planningdocs/pdfmaps/countystateroadsparks.pdf. Other useful map links for information about environmental features, septic/sewer map, county sewer districts map, etc can be found at: www.westchestergov.com/maps ❑ COUNTY ROAD: Applications for development on sites that abut a County road must be submitted for review by the County Department of Public Works. Information and forms can be found at: www.westchestergov.com/dpw/bldgperm.htm. Former County Roads do not need review by the Department of Public Works,but will still likely trigger a review by the County Planning Board. ❑ COUNTY CHANNEL LINES: Applications for development on sites within 100 feet of a designated County Channel Line require a stream control permit from the County Department of Public Works. Information and forms can be found at: www.westchestergov.com/dpw/bldgperm.htm ❑ COUNTY PARK: New construction& land alteration projects adjacent to County parks are expected to address screening& buffer of new uses from the park, as appropriate. Stormwater should not drain from a developed site onto a County park without acceptable quantity and quality controls.County parks are designated as Critical Environmental Areas. ❑ SEWAGE TREATMENT AT COUNTY TREATMENT PLANT: Local municipalities are required to reduce and eliminate inflow and infiltration(1&I)into the sanitary sewage systems tributary to County treatment plants.New development will be expected to reduce I&I in relation to generation of new flow at a ratio of three to one. This requirement must be discussed with local officials. ❑BEE-LINE BUS SERVICE: Bee-Line bus stops serving a development site should be identified on plans or noted if located off-site. If a bus stop is located along the site's frontage, the applicant should contact the County Department of Transportation to discuss impacts and the need for improvements.Safe and separate pedestrian access should be provided to link a bus stop and sidewalk with building entrances. Information on County bus service and design guidelines can be found at: westchestergov.cony/transportation/imagcsBus%20 Service%2OGuidelines.pdf ❑FAIR AND AFFORDABLE HOUSING: Many municipalities require inclusion of fair & affordable units in new developments. Financial assistance to achieve fair & affordable housing development is available through Westchester County & other sources. Applications that include new residential units to be affirmatively marketed & sold or rented subject to fair& affordable housing provisions should be tied to Westchester County guidelines on affordability including income guidelines of eligible households that can be found at: http://homes.westchestergov.com/. If County funding is sought to develop fair & affordable housing,the County Board of Legislators must be included as an involved agency under SEQR. ❑RECYCLING: New buildings must contain a designated area of sufficient size for separation and storage of recyclables and trash. Building expansions should also include sufficient space for separation and storage of recyclables. For more information about County recycling requirements go to:www.westchestergov.com/environment—recycling.htm El STORM SEWER SYSTEM: Any connections to a County storm sewer line will require a permit from the Department of Public Works in accordance with the County Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination(IDDE) law. Information & forms can be found at:www.westchestergov.com/dpw/bldgperm.htm Non-stormwater discharges to the County storm sewer system are prohibited. III.DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS The County Planning Board's land use policies focus attention on several aspects of development that may have intermunicipal and quality of life impacts.The list below includes areas most frequently commented on by the County Planning Board. ❑WATER: All development plans should include sufficient provisions for stormwater management, water quality measures and mitigation of flooding. ❑Plans should identify the major drainage basin or watershed the site is located in (Croton River, Upper Hudson River, Lower Hudson,Upper Long Island Sound, Bronx River and Lower Long Island Sound).An interactive map with watershed boundaries can be found at www.wcstchestergov.com/planning/maps&lists/drainbasinsl lxl7.html ❑Watershed plans have been developed for several of the County's watersheds - the Croton, Indian Brook-Croton Gorge, Bronx River & Long Island Sound watersheds - that include specific recommendations that apply to development projects. See recommendations in watershed plans at:planning.westchestergov.com/index.php?option=,com_content&task=view&id= 1231& Itemid=2204 Site Plan Checklist Page 5 of 7 6/l/2020 Project Address ❑Development that involves filling, creation of impervious surfaces or buildings and substantive loss of natural vegetation in a floodplain or flood prone area should be avoided. ❑Above ground, vegetated retention/detention basins or devices are preferred because they perform better, are easier to inspect and maintain and provide additional environmental benefits over subsurface structural devices. Any such treatments should not be constructed within wetlands or buffer areas around wetlands. ❑The development should treat and retain as much stormwater on-site as possible,particularly when the site is located in a drainage basin with known flooding problems. A Construction Stormwater Toolbox with tools and sources of technical information related to the construction activities and stormwater management best practices is available from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation at:www.dec.ny.gov/chemical/8694.html ❑New development should include protection of aquatic resources. For more information about protection of aquatic resourc-es & buffer areas,go to:planning.westchestergov.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1491&Itemid=2458 El Impervious cover should be minimized. Permeable paving surfaces should be used where feasible. Vegetative rain gardens should be used, particularly in areas of overland or channelized stormwater flow, to improve stormwater quality and reduce runoff volume. For more information,go to: www.westchestergov.com/stonnwater El Buildings along coastlines and low lying area should consider the impacts of sea level rise. Specific consideration is required of potential impacts to surface and subsurface drinking water supplies. ❑ SITE LAYOUT.Aesthetic design,building orientation and community character should be considered in the site layout and building appearance. ❑In most locations,buildings should face the street and have pedestrian access from the street. ❑Commercial buildings should be located near the front street line with the majority of parking located in the rear of the building. Even gas stations and convenience stores should be upfront in a landscaped setting with parking,pumps and canopy toward the rear. ❑Buildings should be of pedestrian-scale when seen from the sidewalk. ❑Building facades should contribute to and enhance the character of the community. El Driveway and pathway connections should be provided to adjacent sites when possible and crosseasements provided. ❑ STREETS. Street design should reduce unwarranted paving and promote connectivity. ❑New streets should connect with adjacent streets wherever feasible to prevent the proliferation of dead-end streets and promote neighborhood integration. ❑Connections could be vehicular or pedestrian/bicycle only,where appropriate. ❑Street widths should be minimized for streets with low traffic volume to reduce speeds and impervious surfaces. Lane widths of 12 feet are only appropriate for major roadways. ❑Driveway widths should be no more than 9 feet to reduce impervious surfaces. El Permeable paving surfaces should be used where feasible. ❑ GREEN TECHNOLOGY.New development should include as many green building elements as possible,such as:renewable building materials,energy efficient heating/cooling systems and fixtures,water saving devices,green roofs and permeable paving surfaces.Information can be obtained from the U.S.Green Building Council at: www.usgbc.org. ❑ LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING.The site improvements should enhance community character. Site Plan Checklist Page 6 of 7 6/1/2020 Project Address ❑ Landscaping should consist of native plant species appropriate for the location. Invasive plant species should be prohibited. Invasive plant information available at:www.westchestergov.com/planning/environmental/Reports/InvasivePlantsBrochO8.pdf ❑ Pollutant tolerant plantings should effectively shield parking,loading areas and refuse collection sites. ❑ Site lighting should be provided at the lowest safe levels and lowest heights,avoiding all spillage off site. ❑ PEDESTRIANS. Safe,convenient and ADA accessible pedestrian access is provided. ❑ A sidewalk should be provided along the site frontage along each street. ❑ Direct pedestrian connections should be made from the front of the building to the sidewalk. Pedestrian crossings of drive-ways& parking lots should be minimized or avoided. If they must be provided,painted crosswalks should be provided through parking lots. ❑ ADA accessibility must be provided. ❑ BICYCLISTS. Provisions for bicyclists should be incorporated into project design. ❑ Bicycle parking should be provided in commercial and residential developments.Guidelines can be found at: www.apbp.org/resource/resmgr/publ ications/bicycle_parking_guidelines.pdf ❑ If near a trailway or bicycle route,extra consideration should be given to bicycle accessibility such as bike lanes on internal roadways,bicycle parking and other amenities. ❑ Drive-thru lanes at uses such as banks and fast-food restaurants should also be accessible for bicycles. Waiver: Upon finding by the Building Inspector, Village Engineer, Planning Board or Board of Trustees that, due to the particular character or limited nature of development or change in use or to special conditions peculiar to a site,the submission of a final site plan,or certain portions of information normally required as part of the site development plan, is inappropriate or unnecessary or that strict compliance with said submission requirements will cause extraordinary and unnecessary hardship,such official or Board may waive such submission requirements wherever,in the opinion of such official or Board, such waiver will be consistent with the goal of promoting the public health, safety and general welfare of the community. The findings for granting such waiver shall become a part of the public record. Any waiver request must be made in writing,and include sufficient detailed information for the appropriate authority to make an informed decision. Design Professional's Certification of Completion of Checklist I have fully reviewed the Village of Rye Brook's requirements and certify this application to be a complete submission. I understand that an incomplete plat or incomplete checklist shall be deemed an incomplete submission and shall be returned to the applicant upon determination of such by the appropriate authority. Name rint) �Z�M(�►iJ �O '�'SHER` ,9 Signature ry' Date �f'J 0009�� ProL eal Site Plan Checklist Page 7 of 7 6/l/2020 Short Environmental Assessment Form Part I - Project Information DEC 2 3 2020 Instructions for Completing Part 1—Project Information. The applicant or project sponsor is responsible for the completion of Part 1. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding,are subject to public review,and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item,please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information. Complete all items in Part 1.You may also provide any additional information which you believe will be needed by or useful to the lead agency;attach additional pages as necessary to supplement any item. Part I —Project and Sponsor Information Name of Action or Project: Marks Residence Project Location(describe,and attach a location map): 18 Hillandale Rd,Rye Brook,NY Brief Description of Proposed Action: Proposed in-ground swimming pool,stone patio,stone retaining walls,stepping stones in grass,deck renovation,and pergola Name of Applicant or Sponsor: Telephone: 914-824-0999 Daniel Sherman E-Mail: dan.danshermaniandscape@gmail.com Address: 4 Broadway,Suite#9 City/PO: State: Zip Code: Valhalla NY 110595 1. Does the proposed action only involve the legislative adoption of a plan,local law,ordinance, NO YES administrative rule,or regulation? If Yes,attach a narrative description of the intent of the proposed action and the environmental resources that El be affected in the municipality and proceed to Part 2. If no,continue to question 2. 2. Does the proposed action require a permit,approval or funding from any other government Agency? NO YES If Yes,list agency(s)name and permit or approval:Planning,Wetlands,Building,Engineering ❑ 3. a.Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? 1.02 acres b.Total acreage to be physically disturbed? .16 acres c.Total acreage(project site and any contiguous properties)owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? acres 4. Check all land uses that occur on,are adjoining or near the proposed action: 5. ❑ Urban ❑ Rural(non-agriculture) ❑ Industrial ❑ Commercial m Residential(suburban) ❑ Forest ❑ Agriculture ❑ Aquatic ❑ Other(Specify): ❑ Parkland Page 1 of 5. Is the proposed action, NO YES N/A a. A permitted use under the zoning regulations? ❑ ❑✓ ❑ b. Consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan? ❑ ❑✓ ❑ NO YES 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the predominant character of the existing built or natural landscape? ❑ ✓❑ 7. Is the site of the proposed action located in,or does it adjoin,a state listed Critical Environmental Area? NO YES If Yes,identify: P(I ❑ NO YES 8. a. Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels? ❑ b. Are public transportation services available at or near the site of the proposed action? ❑✓ ❑ c. Are any pedestrian accommodations or bicycle routes available on or near the site of the proposed ❑ ❑ action? 9. Does the proposed action meet or exceed the state energy code requirements? NO YES If the proposed action will exceed requirements,describe design features and technologies: 10. Will the proposed action connect to an existing public/private water supply? NO YES If No,describe method for providing potable water: 11. Will the proposed action connect to existing wastewater utilities? NO YES If No,describe method for providing wastewater treatment: ❑ ❑✓ 12. a. Does the project site contain,or is it substantially contiguous to,a building,archaeological site,or district NO YES which is listed on the National or State Register of Historic Places,or that has been determined by the ❑ ❑ Commissioner of the NYS Office of Parks,Recreation and Historic Preservation to be eligible for listing on the State Register of Historic Places? b. Is the project site,or any portion of it, located in or adjacent to an area designated as sensitive for ❑ ❑ archaeological sites on the NY State Historic Preservation Office(SHPO)archaeological site inventory? 13. a. Does any portion of the site of the proposed action,or lands adjoining the proposed action,contain NO YES wetlands or other waterbodies regulated by a federal,state or local agency? ❑ ❑✓ b.Would the proposed action physically alter,or encroach into,any existing wetland or waterbody? ❑✓ ❑ If Yes,identify the wetland or waterbody and extent of alterations in square feet or acres: Pagc 2 of 3 14. Identify the typical habitat types that occur on,or are likely to be found on the project site.Check all that apply: ❑Shoreline ❑ Forest ❑Agricultural/grasslands ❑ Early mid-successional ❑Wetland ❑ Urban m Suburban 15. Does the site of the proposed action contain any species of animal,or associated habitats, listed by the State or NO YES Federal government as threatened or endangered? 16. Is the project site located in the 100-year flood plan? NO YES ❑ ❑✓ 17. Will the proposed action create storm water discharge,either from point or non-point sources? NO YES If Yes, ❑ ❑✓ a. Will storm water discharges flow to adjacent properties? ❑ ❑✓ b. Will storm water discharges be directed to established conveyance systems(runoff and storm drains)? ❑ ✓❑ If Yes,briefly describe: Rain Garden 18. Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that would result in the impoundment of water NO YES or other liquids(e.g.,retention pond, waste lagoon,dam)? If Yes,explain the purpose and size of the impoundment: ❑ ❑ 19. Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the location of an active or closed solid waste NO YES management facility? If Yes,describe: 20.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the subject of remediation(ongoing or NO YES completed) for hazardous waste? If Yes,describe: ❑ ❑ I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Applicant/sIlbrisor/name: Dahiel Sherman Date: 12/22/20 Signature: Title: LpyV`,►/< CE fjh .P CA AC/ k PRINT FORM pauc ; of EAF Mapper Summary Report Tuesday, December 22, 2020 2:16 PM Disclaimer: The EAF Mapper is a screening tool intended to assist 129:84-1_16;, j 129:84-1121 project sponsors and reviewing agencies in preparing an environmental i, ';' assessment form(EAF).Not all questions asked in the EAF are 129.76-1-1 129.84-1 20 ; A'' answered by the EAF Mapper.Additional information on any EAF 129.8 4-1-17 / question can be obtained by consulting the EAF Workbooks. Although \� rf/ / , 130.77-1-13 the EAF Mapper provides the most up-to-date digital data available to DEC,you may also need to contact local or other data sources in order 129.84-1-19 to obtain data not provided by the Mapper.Digital data is not a r 1 2 914-1-2 3 substitute for agency determinations. / -- —- Ottalra-0 oMw1 / ~r L 4 poo a 135.28-1-38 35.281-6 Rye 135 139 ' 136.21-1-13 r/ � ToralTo� o 35.28-1-7 ;mot alo Rodie6ter Nti r: Albarry Boston [htrolt _ 135.28 1 37 _ „Prw►dence Cleveland 4 35.28 1 24 r + 1 135-28-1-40 Yak 76 ,� fni m Pittsburgh Philadelphia aMljg.. S2#lteml ap lfJCRENE6ll�Zh1R'C-9i?.Esn Japar<�v1E II,Esn China (Hong Ko_ngl;-Bn tl`AENd P1�FCan,Esn Japan.ME11,Esn China Hong Konj. Esn Korea Esrrfia Ljn�;NGCC,(d OpenSVei �l� ts9bii�ors, anclthe GI UsiIt Wlur yl �fanclpa�5tre2tF:lap :otrtnb �i ia�tot��e GI User Comm unit; Part 1 /Question 7 [Critical Environmental No Area] Part 1 /Question 12a [National or State No Register of Historic Places or State Eligible Sites] Part 1 /Question 12b [Archeological Sites] No Part 1 /Question 13a [Wetlands or Other Yes - Digital mapping information on local and federal wetlands and Regulated Waterbodies] waterbodies is known to be incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. Part 1 /Question 15 [Threatened or No Endangered Animal] Part 1 /Question 16 [100 Year Flood Plain] Yes Part 1 /Question 20 [Remediation Site] Yes Short Environmental Assessment Form - EAF Mapper Summary Report VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK PERMIT# WETLANDS PERMIT APPLICATION EXPIRATIDNDATE Public Works Dept.939-0753 fax 939-0242. Building Dept.939-0668 fax 939-5801 Michal Nowak,Village Engineer/Superintendent&Public Works e-mail: mnowak@rvebrook.org REQUIREMENT SUBMITTALS: I. Application Fee: $1,150 paid���I�OPermit fee: $250 paid 2. Bond Deposit: $ Date Paid DEC 2 3 2020 3. Insurance: attached on file 4. Map: attached on file 5. UFPO No. OwnerrpQajk1 Address 1b "kLLPLXf I& RZ, Ryt_E iM, Q-1 Phone Cim--115- E-mail . MPejLs 13 C, vv*4tl Ca7-r+ Contractor Contact Person WC Home Improvement License: Address Phone E-mail Application is made for a Wetlands Permit at the following address: I E3 4- jU_Pt_lof4L p=-. Qjp Describe in full location of job site (please print): POO» IS L6Cprc+® W NIL"Ptw_OP&E Igor E_ For the purpose of(-C), tl?i Inj Q_) nV A J_QmAmL4_4 ' 60— , 3Trv%. PRlI(�,S—cOlaE CL Wv� UAL, l XDQD cam. +Vt2? ► If permit is granted I agree to comply with all rules and regulations set forth by the Federal,State,County, Local Laws,Special inances,G n 1 Ordi ances. Owner's Signature ********************************************************************************** Office Use Only BOT APPROVAL PLANNING APPROVAL 2 VILLAGE APPROVAL DATE Il O J CONDITIONS FOR PERMIT: RETURN DEPOSIT APPROVAL: DATE RETURN AMOUNT: ENGINEERING & PUBLIC WORKS DEPART VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK D 938 KING STREET RYE BROOK,NY 10573 (914)939-0753 FAX(914)939-0242 FEB 2 3 2021 www.rye rook.org VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK STEEP SLOPE WORK PERMIT APPLICA DING DEPARTMENT FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: PERMIT Approval Authority: Permit Fee: $ 5 Planning Board Approval Date: L 011 LIQ410C I Superintendent of Public Works Approval Date: Disapproved Date: *********************************************************************************************************** REQUIREMENT SUBMITTALS: 1. Properly completed&signed application. 2. Steep Slope Work Permit fee $250.00 Application dated, ZI 2-3�ZI is hereby made for a Steep Slope Work Permit. 1. Address:la ;A%lJJNLlT-)RLF QD SBL: 135225-1-3ci Zone: VZ.-25 2. Property Owner: T)AIJkt- y.�S Address: k9% N1LlfP�yAIF ?Q Phone#:C11q- -b 5- skw% Cell#: email: DAO. MAZ S 13 CJ��1^I1All•�r 3. Applicant: "%EL ZAAE12NNP4.3 Address: 1{ QQCPCL A PN SU CPEZ q, Phone#: QIl1 Cell#: N-IM-O$t6 email: P�U l vt 4. Contractor: Address: 64WIL40" Phone#: Cell#: email: 5. Full Description of Proposed Work:t; +j to-6w x z perj I Sr aI (2t'ipu-K�n (,( )Ij .S� Insys & 1-1x1b) DEC( 6. Steep Slope Disturbance: Isolated Steep Slopes under 400 Square Feet: Square Feet Disturbed (a)MODERATELY STEEP SLOPE A slope equal to or greater than 15%but less than 25%: % Square Feet Disturbed (b)VERY STEEP SLOPE A slope equal to or greater than 25%but less than 35%: % ► 5y(I Square Feet Disturbed (c)EXTREMELY STEEP SLOPE A slope equal to or greater than 35%: % C) Square Feet Disturbed 7. Conditions for Permit: IF PERMIT IS GRANTED,I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH ALL RULES AND REGULATIOZ6 SET FORTH BY THE FEDERAL, STATE,COUNTY,LOCAL LAWS,SPECIAL ORDINANCES,GENERAL ORDINANCES ^ Sig6aiue of Property Owner 2/2021 DANIEL SHERMAN LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, P.C. 4 Broadway, Suite 9 Valhalla, NY 10595 914-824-0999 Fax: 914-824-0251 dsherman4@optonline.net www.danshermonlandscape.com February 3, 2021 Re: Mailing and Sign Posting for Planning Board review re: 18 Hillandale Rd for the meeting of February 11", 2021 This letter will confirm that we sent registered letters to the neighbors within 250' of the property on Friday January 29', 2021. The list and notice accompany this letter. The sign was also posted on February 3, 2021 on the street front of the property. _ C Respectfully, store OrN."r'""'°Ai-m" Daniel Sherman NoteryPublic Cortrritsbn No.50028745 Landscape Architect MpUmwA bnExpkw12115/20,15 I_j 1 LFB - 4 2021 8 VILLAGE 0, I�'Y'4 iB�Ctr)r BUIL�IINC', i-117Pc R 'I�N­r DANIEL SHERMAN LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, P.C. 4 Broadway, Suite 9 Valhalla, NY 10595 914-824-0999 Fax: 914-824-0251 don.donshermanlandscape@gmail.com www.danshermanlandscape.com January 29, 2021 PUBLIC NOTICE A PUBLIC HEARING / MEETING FOR A PLANNING BOARD APPLICATION Regarding a Swimming Pool, Patio, Wood Deck, and Retaining Wall At 18 HILLANDALE RD WILL BE HELD BY THE RYE BROOK PLANNING BOARD ON FEBRUARY 11T", 2021 AT 7:30 P.M. VIA VIDEO CONFERENCE AND IN PERSON, IF PERMITTED BY THE GOVERNOR'S EXECTUIVE ORDERS, AT THE RYE BROOK VILLAGE HALL, 938 KING STREET. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVALIABLE AT THE RYE BROOK BUILDING DEPARTMENT (914) 939-0668. o oRECEIPT CERTIFIED MAIL -o Domestic Mail Only .. . m - � a -. r. Fort Cqt 1 5 • r I 4 ° m i m r•9 Certdled Mall Fee 1 (11 j2 r-1 Certified Mail Fee $3.00 OExtra Services&Frees(check box,add fee as eppmprieteJ Ln Extra Services&FeeS(check box,add fee IapprpLldata) 11 ❑Return Recelpt(hardcopY) $ ❑Retum Receipt(hardccPY) $— ����l(.•�� ❑Return Receipt(eiecironic) 8 Postmark O ❑Return Receipt(electronic) $—_ 11 Postmark C3 ❑Certified Mai;Restncted Delivery $ Here ❑CerlAied Mail Restricted Delivery $_ �1�-�t�._i i�t_ Hare C3 ❑Adult Sgnatme Required $ C:3 ❑Adult Signature Required — O �Posta­ge — Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ ❑Adult Signature Restricted Delivery$ O Postage C3 m $IJ m a $ ill!'29;'2�21 r 1 TO ri rc 5 ra $4.1., 3 Heinberg,Jack L-Melissa P Heinberg $ Abramson Erika L-Marc A Abramson ---i � S. cc r 780 King St ra i 47 Hillandale Rd __; , ---- --------- PORT CHESTER NY 10573 � C PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 r` s --------------- PS Form 7 See Reverse for Instructions PS Form :rr r r. .rr•r :.. . .r rrr•r• . •sta Postal CERTIFIED MAIL® RECEIPTEr oRECEIPT r` Domestic Domestic Mail Only ccFor delivery information, r� ,, r` Em r-1 ;Certified Mail Fee Postage $ C3 $ ro L.r) Extra Services&Fees(check box,add lee as appropriate) Certified Fee ❑Retum Receipt(hardcopy) $ Postmark r1 ❑Retum Receipt(elector—) $ Postmark C3 Retum Receipt Fee Here [] i ❑Certified Mail Restricted Delivery $ Here C3 (Endorsement Required) � ❑Adult Signature Required $ O Restricted Delivery Fee O ❑Adutt Signature Restricted Delivery$ E3 (Endorsement Required) p ,Postage' E• m $ m rill j Hollander,Douglas S-Gail E Hollander — i $ Zuckerman Gary co ef � 35 Hillandale Rd 29 Hillandale Rd __________ o ; o $lie PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 ------------ i :rr r r• :rr t Postal TI Postal CERTIFIED mRECEIPTCERTIFIED © RECEIPT rn Domestic Mail Only C3cc Domestic Mail Only co For delivery information,visit our website at www.UsPs.coM'-. co ormation,visit our website at www.usps.com-' For delivery int 0 F F I CIAL U ,z #4k co CU r`- Postage $ r� Postage $ co cri Certified Fee Certified Fee E3 Postmark C3 Postmark Retum Receipt Fee Here C3 Return Receipt Fee Here O (Endorsement Required) ED (Endorsement Required) O p Restricted Delivery Fee Restricted Delivery Fee C-3 (Endorsement Required) C] (Endorsement Required) E- Q^ m m Loewenstein,David A-Myra K s Settanni Lawrence-Cristina Settanni i Loewensten ,a ...............• r a 22 Hillandale Rd 0 802 King St o s 0, PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 - r` - c PS Form :., July 2014 :r• July 2014 . CERTIFIED , Domestic fT Domestic Mail Only LP) Co .17 b 4 ; L USE , � :.. -U cfl N Postage $ f Postage $ co 11:0 1 Certified Fee Certified Fee p Postmark p vostmark (O Return Receipt Fee Here IO Return Receipt Fee Here p (Endorsement Required) tO (Endorsement Required) p C3 Restricted Delivery Fee Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) (Endorsement Required) C3 Er Q' m m __� Steinberg Richard-Jacqueline Gardner,Barry Jack Fuchs = Steinberg 20 Hillandale Rd ---------------- rq r q 0 24 Hillandale Rd o PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 r PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 ............... r~ ---- --------- See Reverse for Instructions PS Form 3800,July 2014 See Reverse for instruction� PS Form :rr July 2014 Postal Postal CERTIFIED oRECEIPT Ln m Domestic .. Only co i s '_ 4 r` m co r1__ Postage $ r%-- Postage $ ro cc Certified Fee Certified Fee (_3 Postmark C Postmark C] Return Receipt Fee Here f7 Return Receipt Fee Here p (Endorsement Required) p (Endorsement Required) 0 Restricted Delivery Fee Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) (Endorsement Required) O p— Er— m m Harmon,Mark-Ellen Harmon s Moschitto,Joseph-Wanda Moschitto --I- 16 Hillandale Rd ------•------— � s 41 Hillandale Rd ------------- o or PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 C PS Form 3800,July 2014 See Reverse for Instructions PS Form :.. July 2014 Postal Postal Service" CERTIFIED © RECEIPT co I• • r1J I. ra For delivery rmation,visit our website at 5.�o a :€ . EI co co r`- Postage $ It Postage $ cc co Certified Fee Certified Fee a O Postmark Postmark O Return Receipt Fee Here C3 Return Receipt Fee Here O (Endorsement Required) E3 (Endorsement Required) E3 O Restricted Delivery Fee Restricted Delivery Fee I C:3 (Endorsement Required) € (Endorsement Required) Er Er � = To m m Gardner,Barry-Jack Fuchs Sen Wolf,John-Rita Wolf = 20 Hillandale Rd � 33 Hillandale Rd --------_- O PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 St PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 .-•------ City :.. July 2014 _PS Form 3800,July 2014 See Reverse for instructions PS Form CERTIFIED MA�Lo RECEIPT CERTIFIED MAIL@ RECEIPT Domestic Mail Only Er Domestic N c0 For delivery information,visit our website at www.usps.com.11. �DFor delivery information,visit our website at www.usPs.Corn,-. Cxj CLI 171- Postage $ fl-- Postage $ co Certified Fee Certified Fee Q Q --� Postmark -Qostmark iO Return Receipt Fee O Return Receipt Fee Here (Endorsement Required) Here O (Endorsement Required) Restricted Delivery Fee Restricted Delivery Fee ry (Endorsement Required) (Endorsement Required) U' Q' m m Meiri Noah-Renee Rosen - s Greiner,Stephen-Marily Greiner ra 6 Hillandale Rd ra 43 Hillandale Rd --------------- -----•---------- o o PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 o PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PS Form 3800,July 2014 See Reverse for Instructions PS Form 3800,July 2014 See Reverse for Instructions! PostalService U.S. Postal CERTIFIED MAIL' RECEIPT CERTIFIED MAILO RECEIPT .. Only . • For delivery information,visit our website at www.usjps.com`. For delivery information,visit our website at*71w.usps.com". -0 f Postage $ � Postage $ Certified Fee Certified Fee Q O Postmark C3 Postmark t] Return Receipt Fee Here Return Receipt Fee I Here p (Endorsement Required) O (Endorsement Required) C Restricted Delivery Fee II Restricted Delivery Fee (Endorsement Required) (Endorsement Required) 1 Er- )T' m m Marks,Daniel Steven-Yael Mayrav Kamin Robin G Marks 39 Hillandale Rd ----------------- 0 18 Hillandale Rd r7- PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 tt PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PS Form 3800,July 2014 See Reverse for lnstructions� PS Form :.r Postal,July 2014 See Reverse for Instructions CERTIFIED ..a Domestic OWY r r` Postage $ Certified Fee Postmark Return Receipt Fee Here O (Endorsement Required) O Restricted Delivery Fee I (Endorsement Required) I Q- m Fischer Philip-Stephanie Fischer ra 37 Hillandale Rd ................ PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 1 aka i J , Mailing Labels for Property Addresses.Created from Municipal Tax Parcel Viewer. http://piswww.westchestergoy.com GIs— .d&U%N 111407w— Fischer Philip-Stephanie Fischer Wolf,John-Rita Wolf Heinberg,Jack L-Melissa P Heinberg 37 Hillandale Rd 33 Hillandale Rd 780 King St PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 Kamin Robin G Moschitto,Joseph-Wanda Moschitto Abramson Erika L-Marc A Abramson 39 Hillandale Rd 41 Hillandale Rd 47 Hillandale Rd PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 Marks,Daniel Steven-Yael Mayrav Harmon,Mark-Ellen Harmon Zuckerman Gary Marks 16 Hillandale Rd 29 Hillandale Rd 18 Hillandale Rd PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 Greiner,Stephen-Marily Greiner Gardner,Barry-Jack Fuchs Hollander,Douglas S-Gail E Hollander 43 Hillandale Rd 20 Hillandale Rd 35 Hillandale Rd PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 Meiri Noah-Renee Rosen Steinberg Richard-Jacqueline Settanni Lawrence-Cristina Settanni 6 Hillandale Rd Steinberg 22 Hillandale Rd PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 24 Hillandale Rd PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 Gardner,Barry-Jack Fuchs Loewenstein,David A-Myra K 20 Hillandale Rd Loewenstein PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 802 King St PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 Created on: 12/22/2020 Page 1 of 1 ram. `ti a rol A ��r rzlil A � F 2 o f G 'uf m H 0 W W l W U r N yN'� {N�pp N OD p�pt� N N f�V p�p�� {N{pp yNy�� �N�pp pAp � pAp {t{pVp a U i NI a a a a a v a a v v v v a cr a G a R 2 � It m c c m c c c c c c c c c a c c c m n ao o+ ao co o+ en o u� 2 e N o 0 _. •j N Y C t•'i 11 1� Nf C d � � N V N f") � N N N W C = CC Y y m e C C'- >< C3 3 F- a LL S m W L m m y coo .y o YQ L Ji a N L Ta O m T m U7 N m 2 m Ol C J ocW CI N _ R G CL m w o 'm m o mm m j 2`m m Y �� �� � � DANIEL SHERMAN LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, P.C. 4 Broadway, Suite 9 Valhalla, NY 10595 914-824-0999 Fax: 914-824-0251 dsherman4@optonline.net www.donshermanlandscape.com January 5, 2021 Re: Sign Posting for Planning Board review re: 18 Hillandale Rd for the meeting of January 14, 2021 This letter will confirm that the public notice sign for the planning board was posted on the front of the property on January 5'h, 2021. Respectfully, Daniel Sherman Landscape Architect i NoUr>/ Y Coew*Wm No.50028745 W CAWAWM E*U 12115/202•J I JAN - 8 2021 ' VILLAGE OF RYE BRO':: BUILDING DEPARTIAEN l • , „i III /• E• - -, ; .1�"�\ rIL -7� � �,-;y t � ' � 1 �•�. 1�"� _eke' __ , 4 �4t+ w.. • . 4 i• a ' � a •• � • � Pam, . _ • a � • . 1 1 a 1 • a '•• a a - ."A'17 i-.rs,�yp 1�rc Y{i ;y 1h•{p{'' 41 _�w ate— a` � �' '1- .7" .• ~`J,, t� a`� ��� • .yf� I M •.. y i x Hardesty 555 Theodore Fred Ave.,Suite C-301 Rye, NY 10580 &Hanover T:914.967.6540 www.hardestyhanover.com MEMORANDUM D To: Robert I. Goodman, Chairman, and the MAR - 5 2021 Planning Board of the Village of Rye Brook VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK Date: March 5, 2021 L BUILDING DEPARTPOENT Subject: Marks Residence — 18 Hillandale Road —Application for Approval of a Steep Slopes Permit As requested,we have reviewed applications, correspondence and plans submitted by Daniel Sherman, RLA, on behalf of the property owner, Daniel Marks, for approval of a Steep Slopes Permit for the construction of an in-ground swimming pool, retaining walls, deck renovations and a pergola on the property located at 18 Hillandale Road, SBL 135.28-1-39 on the Town of Rye Tax Map, in the R-25 Zoning District. Property Description The 44,478 square-foot property is currently developed with a two-story residence with a deck, walkways, driveway and curb cut. The proposal also includes a Site Plan and Wetlands Permit that were approved by the Planning Board on February 11, 2021. Review We have reviewed application materials and plans that include the following items: 1. Short Environmental Assessment Form and EAF Mapper Summary Report dated 12/22/20; 2. Application for Site Plan Approval; 3. Site Plan Submittal Review Checklist; 4. Wetlands Permit Application; 5. Building Permit Check List &Zoning Analysis; 6. An Engineer's Report for Mark Residence dated 12/16/20, prepared by Christopher S. Utschig, P.E.; 7. The following engineering plans generally entitled, "Marks Residence" prepared Christopher S. Utschig, P.E., last revised 1/29/21: a. Sheet 1 of 2, "Site Plan," b. Sheet 2 of 2, "Construction Details;" Hardesty &Hanover engineering that moves you 8. A plan entitled, "Slope Analysis Plan," prepared Christopher S. Utschig, P.E., dated 2/18/21; 9. The following architectural plans generally entitled, "Marks Residence" prepared John G. Scarlato, Jr., Architect, dated 11/3/20: a. Sheet A-1, "Deck Elevations," b. Sheet A-2, "Deck Floor Plan, Deck Framing Plan," C. Sheet A-3, "Deck Notes & Details;" 10. The following landscape plans generally entitled, "Marks Residence" prepared Daniel Sherman, RLA, last revised 2/4/21: a. Sheet L-1, "Overall Site Plan & Construction Details," b. Sheet L-2, "Site Plan (Pool)," C. Sheet L-3, "Mitigation Planting;" d. Sheet M-1, "Mitigation Planting (Off-Site)," dated 2/3/21; 11. A Site Survey prepared by Ramsay Land Surveying, LLC dated 11/28/20. Please note that our review is limited to planning and environmental issues. We offer the following comments regarding the application: 1. SEQRA. The Proposed Action is a Type II action with regard to SEQR because it involves the construction of minor accessory/appurtenant residential structures, including garages, carports, patios, decks, swimming pools, tennis courts, satellite dishes, fences, barns, storage sheds or other buildings not changing land use or density. 2. Steep Slopes Permit. Construction of the swimming pool will require disturbance of existing steep slopes on the property. The area of steep slopes is associated with the proposed retention area required for stormwater management on the site. Approval of a steep slopes work permit will require compliance of all grading and filling with the requirements of Chapter 213 of the Village Code. We look forward to discussion with the Board. Sarah L. Brown, AICP Senior Planner cc: Honorable Mayor and the Village Board of Trustees Christopher Bradbury, Village Administrator Michal Nowak, Superintendent of Public WorksNillage Engineer Hardesty &Hanover engineering that moves you Jennifer L. Gray, Esq., Village Attorney Daniel Sherman, RLA, for the Applicant Y:1SharedlOfficesWYROata0c)cumentsCOCS215001RyeBmokk4979.0218 Hillandale Rd pmeldou Hardesty 555 Theodore Fremd Ave.,Suite C-301 Rye, NY 10580 &Hanover T:914.967.6540 www.hardestyhanover.com IECIE � VI"E MEMORANDUM FEB 2021 jo To: Robert I. Goodman, Chairman, and the Planning Board of the Village of Rye Brook VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK BUILDING DEPARTMENT Date: February 4, 2021 Subject: Marks Residence — 18 Hillandale Road —Application for Approval of a Site Plan and Wetlands Permit As requested, we have reviewed applications, correspondence and plans submitted by Daniel Sherman, RLA, on behalf of the property owner, Daniel Marks, for approval of a Site Plan and Wetlands Permit for the construction of an in-ground swimming pool, retaining walls, deck renovations and a pergola on the property located at 18 Hillandale Road, SBL 135.28-1-39 on the Town of Rye Tax Map, in the R-25 Zoning District. Property Description The 44,478 square-foot property is currently developed with a two-story residence with a deck, walkways, driveway and curb cut. Review We have reviewed application materials and plans that include the following items: 1. Short Environmental Assessment Form and EAF Mapper Summary Report dated 12/22/20; 2. Application for Site Plan Approval; 3. Site Plan Submittal Review Checklist; 4. Wetlands Permit Application; 5. Building Permit Check List& Zoning Analysis; 6. An Engineer's Report for Mark Residence dated 12/16/20, prepared by Christopher S. Utschig, P.E.; 7. The following engineering plans generally entitled, "Marks Residence" prepared Christopher S. Utschig, P.E., last revised 1/29/21: a. Sheet 1 of 2, "Site Plan," b. Sheet 2 of 2, "Construction Details;" 8. The following architectural plans generally entitled, "Marks Residence" prepared John G. Scarlato, Jr., Architect, dated 11/3/20: Hardesty &Hanover _ engineering that moves you a. Sheet A-1, "Deck Elevations," b. Sheet A-2, "Deck Floor Plan, Deck Framing Plan," C. Sheet A-3, "Deck Notes & Details;" 9. The following landscape plans generally entitled, "Marks Residence" prepared Daniel Sherman, RLA, last revised 2/4/21: a. Sheet L-1, "Overall Site Plan & Construction Details," b. Sheet L-2, "Site Plan (Pool)," C. Sheet L-3, "Mitigation Planting;" d. Sheet M-1, "Mitigation Planting (Off-Site)," dated 2/3/21; 10. A Site Survey prepared by Ramsay Land Surveying, LLC dated 11/28/20. Please note that our review is limited to planning and environmental issues. We offer the following comments regarding the application: 1. SEQRA. The Proposed Action is a Type II action with regard to SEQR because it involves the construction of minor accessory/appurtenant residential structures, including garages, carports, patios, decks, swimming pools, tennis courts, satellite dishes, fences, barns, storage sheds or other buildings not changing land use or density. 2. Wetlands and Wetland Buffers. The new impervious surface coverage of the pool, patio, deck addition and pool equipment would be located within the 100-foot regulated wetland buffer. The proposed disturbance of the buffer will require approval of a wetlands permit in accordance with Chapter 245, Wetlands, of the Village Code and mitigation for disturbance of the buffer at a ratio of 2:1 (mitigation: total area of disturbance).According to the calculations included on Sheet L-3 of the landscape architect's plans, the area of disturbance within the wetland buffer is 9,296 square feet which would require 18,592 square feet of mitigation. The landscape plan proposes 12,900 square feet of new plantings on-site and 5,692 square feet of off-site mitigation to satisfy the mitigation requirement. An off-site mitigation plan has been provided as part of the Applicant's submission. The plan should be revised to note the location of the off-site mitigation with the parcel address or section, block and lot number. In addition, the note on the plan regarding invasive species should be revised to note that any other invasive species encountered in the mitigation area will also be removed. Hardesty &Hanover engineering that moves you We look forward to discussion with the Board. Sarah L. Brown, AICP Senior Planner M. Honorable Mayor and the Village Board of Trustees Christopher Bradbury, Village Administrator Michal Nowak, Superintendent of Public Works/Village Engineer Jennifer L. Gray, Esq., Village Attorney Daniel Sherman, RLA, for the Applicant Y:1Shared\OffcesWYROata\Documents\DOCS215001RyeBrookW979.0218 Hillandale Rd pme2.docx Hardesty 555 Theodore Fremd Ave.,Suite C-301 Rye, NY 10580 &Hanover T:914.967.6540 www.hardestyhanover.com MEMORANDUM 1 1 2021 To. Robert I. Goodman, Chairman, and the [JAN _ Planning Board of the Village of Rye Brook VILLAGE OF R Y E BROOK BUILDING DEPARTMENT Date: January 8, 2021 Subject: Marks Residence— 18 Hillandale Road —Application for Approval of a Site Plan and Wetlands Permit As requested, we have reviewed applications, correspondence and plans submitted by Daniel Sherman, RLA, on behalf of the property owner, Daniel Marks, for approval of a Site Plan and Wetlands Permit for the construction of an in-ground swimming pool, retaining walls, deck renovations and a pergola on the property located at 18 Hillandale Road, SBL 135.28-1-39 on the Town of Rye Tax Map, in the R-25 Zoning District. Property Description The 44,478 square-foot property is currently developed with a two-story residence with a deck, walkways, driveway and curb cut. Review We have reviewed application materials and plans that include the following items- 1. Short Environmental Assessment Form and EAF Mapper Summary Report dated 12/22/20-1 2. Application for Site Plan Approval; 3. Site Plan Submittal Review Checklist; 4. Wetlands Permit Application; 5. Building Permit Check List & Zoning Analysis; 6. An Engineer's Report for Mark Residence dated 12/16/20, prepared by Christopher S. Utschig, P.E.; 7. The following engineering plans generally entitled, "Marks Residence" prepared Christopher S. Utschig, P.E., dated 12/16/20: a. Sheet 1 of 2, "Site Plan," b. Sheet 2 of 2, "Construction Details:" 8. The following architectural plans generally entitled, "Marks Residence" prepared John G. Scarlato, Jr., Architect, dated 11/3/20: Hardesty &Hanover engineering that moves you a. Sheet A-1, "Deck Elevations," b. Sheet A-2, "Deck Floor Plan, Deck Framing Plan," C. Sheet A-3, "Deck Notes & Details;" 9. The following landscape plans generally entitled, "Marks Residence" prepared Daniel Sherman, RLA, dated 12/22/20: a. Sheet L-1, "Overall Site Plan & Construction Details," b. Sheet L-2, "Site Plan (Pool)," C. Sheet L-3, "Mitigation Planting;" 10. A Site Survey prepared by Ramsay Land Surveying, LLC dated 11/28/20. Please note that our review is limited to planning and environmental issues. We offer the following comments regarding the application: 1. SEQRA. The Proposed Action is a Type II action with regard to SEQR because it involves the construction of minor accessory/appurtenant residential structures, including garages, carports, patios, decks, swimming pools, tennis courts, satellite dishes, fences, barns, storage sheds or other buildings not changing land use or density. 2. Tree Replacement. Based on the submitted plans, it appears that no trees will be removed as part of the project. This should be confirmed by the Applicant. 3. Wetlands and Wetland Buffers. The new impervious surface coverage of the pool, patio, deck addition and pool equipment would be located within the 100-foot regulated wetland buffer. The proposed disturbance of the buffer will require approval of a wetlands permit in accordance with Chapter 245, Wetlands, of the Village Code and mitigation for disturbance of the buffer at a ratio of 2:1 (mitigation: total area of disturbance).According to the calculations included on Sheet L-3 of the landscape architect's plans, the area of disturbance within the wetland buffer is 7,216 square feet, and the landscape plan proposes 16,053 square feet of new plantings to satisfy the mitigation requirement. However, the proposed plantings are located throughout various areas of the site rather than within the wetland buffer. Typically, the purpose of the mitigation is to enhance with wetland buffer to off-set the disturbance. If the Applicant cannot provide all of the required mitigation within the wetland buffer, off-site mitigation may be necessary. We look forward to discussion with the Board. Sarah L. Brown, AICP Senior Planner Hardesty Oanover engineering that moves you cc: Honorable Mayor and the Village Board of Trustees Christopher Bradbury, Village Administrator Michal Nowak, Superintendent of Public Works/Village Engineer Jennifer L. Gray, Esq., Village Attorney Daniel Sherman, RLA, for the Applicant Y:ISharedlOfficesWYR\DataCocuments\DOCS215001RyeBrook14979.0218 Hillandale Rd pmel.docx 570 Taxter Road,Suite 300 Dolph Rotfeld Engineering Elmsford, NY 10523 (914) 631-8600 phone An ®Engineers Company (914) 631-5769 fax www.drepc.com www.aiengineers.com TO: Mr. Michal Nowak Village of Rye Brook FROM: James Natarelli, P.E. (� DATE: January 19, 2021 I JAN 2 0 2021 _y) SUBJECT: 18 Hillandale Road VILLAijL C& Kt ILH BROOK Site Plan Application BUILDING DEPARTMENT In reference to the above-mentioned project,this office has received (on January 14, 2021)and reviewed the following: 1. Engineer's Report prepared by Christopher S. Utschig, P.E. dated October 8, 2020 revised January 13, 2021; 2. Plans prepared by Christopher S. Utschig, P.E. dated December 14, 2020 revised January 14, 2021; 3. Memo prepared by Christopher S. Utschig, P.E. dated April 8, 2019(sic). With respect to the proposed stormwater management design demonstrated on the submitted plans and report our comments are as follows but are not limited to: 1. The new stormwater design indicates that stormwater from all impervious surfaces(existing and proposed)will be directed into a new detention basin and that all runoff is to be "detained/infiltrated". However, no information has been provided to support an infiltration design (i.e., percolation tests and deep test holes). Additionally,with an outlet control structure that has an inlet at elevation 158,the structure will discharge stormwater before the full volume of the design storm is retained in the proposed basin. The current design does not appear to meet the Village's requirement of"total volume storage". 2. If the new detention basin is proposed to take runoff from existing impervious surfaces then all piping from those surfaces to the new basin must be shown on the site plan. 3. The 100-year flood elevation line must be provided on the site plan and it must be labeled. 4. The plan must indicate the type of filter system that is proposed for the pool and it may refer to plans by others as necessary. 5. A construction entrance/anti-tracking pad detail has been provided. It is not clear where this is proposed to be installed. 6. A detail must be provided for the proposed channel drain. Rim and invert elevations must also be provided. 7. The outlet structure detail includes an "inlet" however it is unclear where this inlet pipe is proposed on the site plan. All proposed piping must be shown on the site plan. Improving Life.By Design. Mr.Nowak Rye Brook Planning Board ®Engineers 18 Hillandale Road-Site Plan Application January 19,2021 Page 2 8. The basin volume calculation appears to use contour 162 as the top of the basin's available storage. However,the spillway elevation is proposed at 161.9. Therefore,the basin volume should be calculated using elevation 161.9 as the top of the basin's available storage. Upon receipt of amended plans addressing these comments,this office is prepared to continue its review. Improving Life.By Design. 570 Taxter Road,Suite 300 Dolph Rodeld Engineering Elmsford, NY 10523 (914) 631-8600 phone An Engineers Company (914) 631-5769 faxwww.drepc.com www.ciiengineers.com TO: Mr. Michal Nowak Village of Rye Brook FROM: James Natarelli, P.E. \VJ/ v � I DATE: December 31, 2020 ' JAN -412021 SUBJECT: 18 Hillandale Road VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK Site Plan Application r,+Rltry F)FPART1..,1ENT In reference to the above-mentioned project,this office has received (on December 29, 2020)and reviewed the following: 1. Engineer's Report prepared by Christopher S. Utschig, P.E. dated December 16, 2020; 2. Plans prepared by Christopher S. Utschig, P.E. dated December 14, 2020; 3. Plans prepared by Daniel Sherman Landscape Architect dated November 11,2020 revised December 22,2020; 4. Survey prepared by Ramsay Land Surveying, LLC dated November 28, 2020. With respect to the proposed stormwater management design demonstrated on the submitted plans and report our comments are as follows but are not limited to: 1. The existing on-site infiltration system that is referenced in the Engineer's Report must be located on the site plan. Proper horizontal separation between the new proposed work and the existing infiltration system must be provided. If the existing infiltration system must be relocated then new percolation tests and deep test holes may be required. 2. The Engineer's Report discusses"proposed infiltration" in the Existing Conditions section of the report and that "The design proposes an underground detention/infiltration system consisting of(4)Cultec 330HD" in the Proposed Condition section. However,the site plan does not include the locations of any existing or proposed underground detention/infiltration systems. The proposed stormwater improvements must be clarified. 3. The Existing Conditions section of the Engineer's Report indicates an existing impervious coverage of 7,210 sf. The Proposed Condition section indicates a total proposed impervious coverage of 9,610 sf and "An increase over existing of 2,320 sf". However,the impervious coverage difference based on the existing and proposed values appears to be 2,400 sf. This calculation must be clarified in the report. 4. The Existing Conditions section of the Engineer's Report indicates that"Percolation tests were conducted". The locations, parameters,and results of the percolation tests must be provided and certified. Deep test holes must also be conducted to confirm proper separation from potential rock or groundwater. Improving Life.By Design. Mr.Nowak Rye Brook Planning Board Engineers 18 Hillandale Road-Site Plan Application December 31,2020 Page 2 5. The Proposed Condition section of the Engineer's Report indicates that the"total volume of runoff for the proposed condition was calculated at 13,994 sf'. The unit of measurement for the volume of runoff must be clarified. 6. No documents or information were provided in any of the Engineer's Report's three appendices (A: Existing/Proposed Condition Calculations; B: Infiltration Calculations; C:Soil Survey). This information must be provided for review. 7. The 100-year flood elevation line must be provided on the site plan. 8. Proposed length and width dimensions as well as contours/elevations must be provided on the site plan for the proposed rain garden. 9. Top of wall and bottom of wall elevations must be provided for the proposed retaining wall. 10. Proposed spot elevations must be provided around the proposed pool coping. 11. "Start micro domain"and pipe length and slope information are indicated on the site plan. However, it is unclear what these are or what they refer to. These items must be clarified, pipe destinations must be identified, and details must be provided as necessary. 12. The type of filter system that is proposed for the pool must be provided,along with any connections to the sanitary sewer system as appropriate.The proposed method of draining the pool must also be provided. Upon receipt of amended plans addressing these comments,this office is prepared to continue its review. Improving Life.By Design. Christopher S. Utschig P.E. 914 391-9550 65 Ralph Ave,White Plains NY 20606 Chris@stevenscompanies.org April 8, 2019 Michal J. Nowack Village of Rye Brook Engineering Department iL 938 King St. n Ic; Rye Brook, NY 10573 JAN 14 2021 RE: 18 Hillandale Road VILLA6-E OF Rt'Lz BkOOK BUILDING DFPARTMENT Dear Michal: In response to comments from James Natarelli dated 12/31/20 we offer the following: 1. The existing on-site infiltration system that is referenced in the Engineer's Report must be located on the site plan. Proper horizontal separation between the new proposed work and the existing infiltration system must be provided. If the existing infiltration system must be relocated then new percolation tests and deep test holes may be required. The engineers report was outdated relative to the plans.An updated report is attached,The infiltration practice proposed in the initial design has been replaced with a detention basin. 2. The Engineer's Report discusses "proposed infiltration"in the Existing Conditions section of the report and that"The design proposes an underground detention/infiltration system consisting of(4)Cultec 330HD"in the Proposed Condition section. However, the site plan does not include the locations of any existing or proposed underground detention/infiltration systems. The proposed stormwater improvements must be clarified. The engineers report was outdated relative to the plans.An updated report is attached,The infiltration practice proposed in the initial design has been replaced with a wetland planted detention basin. 3.The Existing Conditions section of the Engineers Report indicates an existing impervious coverage of 7,210 sf.The Proposed Condition section indicates a total proposed impervious coverage of 9,610 sf and"An increase over existing of 2,320 sf'. However,the impervious coverage difference based on the existing and proposed values appears to be 2,400 sf.This calculation must be clarified in the report. The revised engineers report clarifys the mitigation sizing to be dependent on the total impervious area onsite post development.Therefore,the relative increase is immaterial on mitigation sizing. For the purpose of coverage calculations,the report represents the correct areas pre and post development. Bourne Residence April 15, 2013 Page 2 4. The Existing Conditions section of the Engineer's Report indicates that "Percolation tests were conducted". The locations, parameters, and results of the percolation tests must be provided and certified. Deep test holes must also be conducted to confirm proper separation from potential rock or groundwater. Perc and Deep holes were performed however as the design opts to utilize detention the results of those tests are not germane. 5. The Proposed Condition section of the Engineer's Report indicates that the "total volume of runoff for the proposed condition was calculated at 13,994 sf". The unit of measurement for the volume of runoff must be clarified. The runoff volume has been corrected in the revised engineering report. 6. No documents or information were provided in any of the Engineer's Report's three appendices (A: Existing/Proposed Condition Calculations; B: Infiltration Calculations; C: Soil Survey). This information must be provided for review. The engineers report was outdated relative to the plans. An updated report is amended accordingly. 7. The 100-year flood elevation line must be provided on the site plan. The plans have been updated to indicate the 100-Year floodplain, all work is proposed outside of the floodplain. 8. Proposed length and width dimensions as well as contours/elevations must be provided on the site plan for the proposed rain garden. The revised design proposes a detention basin,the basin configuration and elevation information has been added to the plans 9. Top of wall and bottom of wall elevations must be provided for the proposed retaining wall. Wall elevations have been added to the plans accordingly. 10. Proposed spot elevations must be provided around the proposed pool coping. Elevations have been added to the plan accordingly. 11. "Start micro domain" and pipe length and slope information are indicated on the site plan. However, it is unclear what these are or what they refer to. These items must be clarified, pipe destinations must be identified, and details must be provided as necessary. Christopher S Utschig Bourne Residence April 15, 2013 Page 3 Plan details have been added accordingly. 12.The type of filter system that is proposed for the pool must be provided, along with any connections to the sanitary sewer system as appropriate.The proposed method of draining the pool must also be provided. The filter will be a cartridge type filter with no backwash requirement. Christopher S. Utschig Christopher S Utschig Tara Gerardi From: Michal Nowak Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2021 7:35 PM To: Tara Gerardi Subject: FW: Hillandale Rd - #18 (02-10-21).pdf Al Engineers - FEB 16 2021 From: Michal Nowak Sent:Thursday, February 11, 2021 5:34 PM To:Sarah Brown <sbrown@hardestyhanover.com>; Robert Goodman <rig_lawyer@hotmail.com>;Jennifer Gray (jgray@kblaw.com) <jgray@kblaw.com> Subject: FW: Hillandale Rd -#18 (02-10-21).pdf Al Engineers From:James Natarelli dames@drepc.com> Sent:Thursday, February 11, 20214:07 PM To: Michal Nowak<MNowak@rvebrook.org> Subject: RE: Hillandale Rd -#18 (02-10-21).pdf Hi Michal, As discussed, the stormwater mitigation concept proposed by the design engineer and the accompanying sizing calculations appear to be in compliance with Village code. Some proposed grading and construction details need to be refined but these are items that we can continue to discuss with the design engineer and resolve prior to Building Permit issuance. Please call or email if you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the application further. Thanks, James Natarelli, PE Associate Vice President M1"Il ;illeci-5 Dolph Roffeld Engineering Division 570 Taxter Road Elmsford,New York 10523 Phone: (914) 631-8600 ext.505 Fax: (914) 631-5769 www.aienaineers.com From: Michal Nowak<MNowak@ryebrook.ore> Sent:Thursday, February 11, 2021 12:36 PM To:James Natarelli dames@drepc.com> Subject: FW: Hillandale Rd -#18 (02-10-21).pdf Importance: High 1 Tara Gerardi From: Michal Nowak Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2021 8:04 PM To: Sarah Brown; Jennifer Gray; Tara Gerardi Subject: Fwd: Planning Board Public Comment in Support of the Improvements to 18 Hillandale Rd. I Sent from my iPhone FEB 16 2021 Begin forwarded message: VILLAt�E OF RY` BROOK B(IILGiNG ,c'°ARTP.1EN1'T From: Matthew Rettner<mhrettner@gmail.com> Date: February 11, 2021 at 7:40:28 PM EST To: Michal Nowak<MNowak@ryebrook.org> Cc: Amy Rettner<amyrettner@gmail.com> Subject: Planning Board Public Comment in Support of the Improvements to 18 Hillandale Rd. Dear Mr. Nowak and members of the planning board, My wife and I are the owners of 41 Hillandale Rd. Rye Brook, NY and live directly across the street from 18 Hillandale Rd. We have reviewed the plans for the project at our neighbors' home, and are writing to express our full support. The renderings look beautiful, and we think this project will only enhance the neighborhood. We encourage your support as well. Matthew and Amy Rettner Sent from my iPhone i Qy� BAR 4 p U. d,�� 2-la ti .4 L��Cti;J1v 406 annivma}aj VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK MAYOR 938 King Street, Rye Brook,N.Y. 10573 ADMINISTRATOR Jason A.Klein (914) 939-0753 Christopher J.Bradbury www.ryebrook.or� TRUSTEES SUPERINTENDENT Susan R.Epstein OF PUBLIC WORKS Stephanie J. Fischer Michal Nowak David M. Heiser Salvatore W.Morlino November 30,2022 Daniel Marks &Yael Marks 18 Hillandale Road Rye Brook,New York 10573 Re: Planning Board Escrow Account for 18 Hillandale Road Dear Daniel Marks &Yael Marks: Your project escrow account currently has a negative balance which must be brought up to date. Please deposit with the Village, the sum of$1,042.50 as soon as possible. Our office may have not received the final invoices for this application, however a spread sheet outlining invoices is attached for your review. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, Tara A. Orlando Secretary,Planning Board, Zoning Board of Appeals & Architectural Review Board Cc: Michal Nowak, Superintendent of Public Works Enclosure PROJECTADDRESS 18 HILLANDALE PROJECTNAME MARKS ACCO UNT# ACCOUNT START DATE: ACCOUNT CLOSE DATE: Acct close date here INVOICE DATE INVOICE# CHECK DATE CHECK# DISTRIBUTED TO DEBIT DEPOSIT Balance Unpaid Invoices 12/23/2020 149 VRB $ 2,500.00 2/10/2021 21-52 3/23/2021 1317 DOLPH S 833.75 2/12/2021 65648 3/23/2021 1322 K&13 S 625.00 3/11/2021 67263 5/5/2021 1331 K&13 S 1,425.00 3/12/2021 21-56 4/8/2021 1324 DOLPH S 797.50 3/18/2021 F4979.02-01 5/5/2021 1329 FPC S 1,610.00 4/14/2021 162 VRB $ 2,791.25 4/15/2021 68116 7/19/2021 1348 K&B $ 275.00 5/11/2021 165 VRB $ 275.00 4/26/2021 F4979.02-02 7/7/2021 1340 FPC $ 280.00 6/15/2021 168 VRB $ 280.00 9/14/2021 72554 10/22/2021 1368 K&13 $ 100.00 10/4/2021 179 VRB $ 100.00 1/21/2022 188 VRB $ 2,500.00 2/13/2022 76719 3/8/2022 1395 K&13 S 50.00 3/15/2022 79384 4/7/2022 1398 K&B S 1,500.00 4/11/2022 80076 5/5/2022 1403 K&B S 900.00 5/12/2022 80861 8/12/2022 1419 K&B S 925.00 6/15/2022 F4979.02-03 8/12/2022 1418 FPC S 2,755.00 6/20/2022 81946 8/12/2022 1419 K&B S 1,075.00 7/15/2022 22-91 11/16/2022 1435 DOLPH S 1,280.00 7/10/2022 82588 11/16/2022 1437 K&13 S 975.00 7/31/2022 204 VRB $ 4,705.00 8/12/2022 22-94 11/16/2022 1435 DOLPH $ 1,720.00 8/11/2022 F4979.02-04 11/16/2022 1436 FPC $ 507.50 8/18/2022 83401 11/16/2022 1437 K&B S 1,125.00 9/15/2022 84512 K&B S 175.00 9/29/2022 22-96 DOLPH S 360.00 9/28/2022 F4979.02-05 FPC $ 507.50 11/l/2022 226 VRB $ 5,607.50 $ 19,801.25 $ 18,758.75 -$1,042.50 $ 1,042.50 Qy� BAR 4 p U. d,�� 2-la ti .4 L��Cti;J1v 406 annivma}aj VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK MAYOR 938 King Street, Rye Brook,N.Y. 10573 ADMINISTRATOR Jason A.Klein (914) 939-0753 Christopher J.Bradbury www.ryebrook.or� TRUSTEES SUPERINTENDENT Susan R.Epstein OF PUBLIC WORKS Stephanie J. Fischer Michal Nowak David M. Heiser Salvatore W.Morlino September 20, 2022 Daniel Marks &Yael Marks 18 Hillandale Road Rye Brook,New York 10573 Re: Planning Board Escrow Account for 18 Hillandale Road Dear Daniel Marks &Yael Marks: Your project escrow account currently has a negative balance which must be brought up to date. Please deposit with the Village, the sum of $5,807.50 as soon as possible. Our office may have not received the final invoices for this application, however a spread sheet outlining invoices is attached for your review. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, Tara A. Orlando Secretary,Planning Board, Zoning Board of Appeals & Architectural Review Board Cc: Michal Nowak, Superintendent of Public Works Enclosure PROJECTADDRESS 18 HILLANDALE PROJECT NAME MARKS ACCO UNT# ACCOUNT START DATE: ACCO UNT CLOSE DATE: Acct close elate ben INVOICE DATE INVOICE# CHECK DATE CHECK# DISTRIBUTED TO DEBIT DEPOSIT Balance Unpaid Invoices 12/23/2020 149 VRB $ 2,500.00 2/10/2021 21-52 3/23/2021 1317 DOLPH $ 833.75 2/12/2021 65648 3/23/2021 1322 K&B $ 625.00 3/11/2021 67263 5/5/2021 1331 K&B $ 1,425.00 3/12/2021 21-56 4/8/2021 1324 DOLPH $ 797.50 3/18/2021 F4979.02-01 5/5/2021 1329 FPC $ 1,610.00 4/14/2021 162 VRB $ 2,791.25 4/15/2021 68116 7/19/2021 1348 K&B $ 275.00 5/11/2021 165 VRB $ 275.00 4/26/2021 F4979.02-02 7/7/2021 1340 FPC $ 280.00 6/15/2021 168 VRB $ 280.00 9/14/2021 72554 10/22/2021 1368 K&B $ 100.00 10/4/2021 179 VRB $ 100.00 1/21/2022 188 VRB $ 2,500.00 2/13/2022 76719 3/8/2022 1395 K&B $ 50.00 3/15/2022 79384 4/7/2022 1398 K&B $ 1,500.00 4/11/2022 80076 5/5/2022 1403 K&B $ 900.00 5/12/2022 80861 8/12/2022 1419 K&B $ 925.00 6/15/2022 F4979.02-03 8/12/2022 1418 FPC $ 2,755.00 6/20/2022 81946 8/12/2022 1419 K&B $ 1,075.00 7/15/2022 22-91 DOLPH $ 1,280.00 7/10/2022 82588 K&B $ 1,175.00 7/31/2022 204 VRB $ 4,705.00 8/12/2022 22-94 DOLPH $ 1,720.00 8/11/2022 F4979.02-04 FPC $ 507.50 8/18/2022 83401 K&B $ 1,125.00 $ 18,958.75 $ 13,151.25 -$5,807.50 $ 5,807.50 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK MAYOR 938 King Street,Rye Brook, N.Y. 10573 ADMINISTRATOR Paul S. Rosenberg (914) 939-0753 Christopher J. Bradbury voww.Q}ebrook.org TRUSTEES SUPERINTENDENT Susan R Epstein OF PUBLIC WORKS Stephanie J. Fischer Michal Nowak David M. Heiser Jason A. Mein September 24,2021 Daniel Marks &Yael Marks 18 Hillandale Road Rye Brook, New York 10573 Re: Planning Board Escrow Account for 18 Hillandale Road Dear Daniel Marks &Yael Marks: Your project escrow account currently has a negative balance which must be brought up to date. Please deposit with the Village, the sum of$100.00 (one hundred dollars) as soon as possible. The spread sheet outlining invoices is attached for your review. Thank you for your attention to this matter. The applicable section of Village Code requiring payment of professional fees by the applicant is included on the next page for your review and convenience. Sincerely, Tara A. Gerardi Secretary, Planning Board, Zoning Board of Appeals & Architectural Review Board Cc: Michal Nowak, Superintendent of Public Works Enclosures 1 § 47-2. Escrow accounts. [Adopted by the Board of Trustees of the Village of Rye Brook 8-9-1994 by L.L. No. 9-1994;amended in its entirety 10-27-2020 by L.L. No. 9-2020. Subsequent amendments noted where applicable.] A. An escrow account to pay such consultant's fees may be required where the Village deems it necessary to retain a consultant regarding the application for the following applications: (1)Applications requesting an interpretation of any provision of the Village Code; (2)Site plan applications in accordance with Chapter 209; (3) Special use permit applications in accordance with�250-6H; (4)Variance applications in accordance with 5 250-13; (5) Subdivision applications in accordance with Chapter 219; (6)Architectural review in accordance with Chapter 8; (7) Erosion and sediment control permit in accordance with Chapter 118; (8) Floodplain development permit in accordance with Chapter 130; (9) Steep slopes work permit in accordance with Chapter 213; (10)Permits to perform any regulated activity in a wetland in accordance with Chapter 245; (11)Tree removal appeal in accordance with Chapter 235;and (12)Any other application where the Village deems it necessary to retain a consultant regarding the application. B.The applicant shall submit a separate check in an amount to be determined by the Village Administrator or Superintendent of Public Works/Village Engineer,but not less than $250 nor more than$2,500, to be used to establish an escrow account, from which withdrawals shall be made to reimburse the Village for the costs of professional review services. C.The applicant skull be provided with copies of any Village invoice for such services as they are submitted to the Village.All costs charged to the applicant shall be those reasonable and necessary to the decision making function of the reviewing board as set/defined in §47-1B. D.The applicant shall be required, from time to time, to deliver additional funds to the Village for deposit in the escrow account if such additional funds are required to pay for professional consultation services rendered to the Village or anticipated to be rendered.This amount shall be determined by the reviewing board or the Superintendent of Public Works/Village Engineer based on an evaluation of the nature and complexity of the application. E. If such account is not replenished within 30 days after the applicant is notified,in writing,of the requirement for such additional deposit,the reviewing Board may suspend its review of the application. An application shall be deemed incomplete if any amount shall be outstanding. 2 F.In the event that any application before any Board or department is withdrawn prior to any actions being taken,the applicant is nevertheless responsible for any expenses incurred by the Village with regard to said application prior to such withdrawal. G.A deposit in escrow may be required at any stage in the application process,including but not limited to preapplication discussions with the applicant. H.The applicant shall be provided with copies of any invoice for consultant fees as they are submitted to the Village and with Village staff time records for services for which reimbursement is sought. I.Escrow funds shall be refunded to the applicant when the applicant formally withdraws the application from consideration by the permitting authority or when the applicant receives a final determination from the permitting authority;in either case,all reimbursable charges incurred by the Village shall be first deducted from the escrow account,leaving an unencumbered balance that is not required by the permitting authority to pay consulting costs attributable to the application. Fees collected in accordance with the Village Code shall not be refunded.After all pertinent costs have been paid,the Village shall refund to the applicant any funds remaining in the escrow account within 30 days from the date of the final determination issued by permitting authority or from the date the applicant notifies the Village,in writing, of the withdrawal of the application. If the applicant is indebted to the Village for any fees, the amount of money still owed shall be added to the real property Village tax of the property and shall become a lien against the property if not paid within 30 days of written demand. J.A building permit nor certificate of occupancy or use shall not be issued unless all professional review fees charged in connection with the applicant's project have been paid by the applicant.In no case shall a building permit or certificate of occupancy be issued to the applicant if the applicant is indebted to the Village for any professional review fees in excess of the escrow. K.The imposition of escrow account fees are in addition to,and not in place of, other fee schedules currently in force. 3 PRO ECTADDRESS 18 HILLA.NDAI.E PRO CTNAME MARKS ACCOUNT# ACCOUNT START DATE: ACCOUNT CLOSE DATE: Aces eldse dale here INVOICE DATE INVOICE#r-HF-CKDATIE CHECK# DISTRIBUTED TO DEBIT DEPOSIT Balance jUnpaidlnvoices 12/23/2020 149 VRB $ 2,500.00 2/10/2021 21-52 3/23/2021 1317 DOLPH $ 833.75 2/12/2021 65648 3/23/2021 1322 K&B $ 625.00 3/11/2021 67263 5/5/2021 1331 K&B $ 1,425.00 3/12/2021 21-56 4/8/2021 1324 DOLPH $ 797.50 3/18/2021 F4979.02-01 5/5/2021 1329 FPC $ 1,610.00 4/14/2021 162 VRB $ 2,791.25 4/15/2021 68116 7/19/2021 1348 K&B $ 275.00 5/11/2021 165 VRB $ 275.00 4/26/2021 F4979.02-02 7/7/2021 1340 FPC $ 280.00 6/15/2021 168 VRB $ 280.00 9/14/2021 72-554 K&B 5 100.00 $ 5,946.25 $ 5,946.25 4300.00 $ 100.00 Q�C BRCS�. v yL V4 yu,.7,� VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK MAYOR 938 King Street, Rye Brook,N.Y. 10573 ADMINISTRATOR Paul S.Rosenberg (914) 939-0668 Fax (914) 939-5801 Christopher J.Bradbury www.ryebrook.org TRUSTEES SUPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS Susan R. Epstein Michal Nowak Stephanie J.Fischer David M. Heiser Jason A. Klein June 10,2021 Daniel Marks &Yael Marks 18 Hillandale Road Rye Brook,New York 10573 Re: Planning Board Escrow Account for 18 Hillandale Road Dear Daniel Marks &Yael Marks, Your project currently has a negative balance. Please submit payment to the Village of Rye Brook,the sum of $280.00 (two hundred eighty dollars) as soon as possible. The spread sheet outlining invoices is attached for your review. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, ^41140u— MichalJ. Nowak Superintendent of Public Works /tg enclosures PROJECTADDRESS 18 HILLANDALE PROJECT NAME MARKS ACCOUNT# ACCOUNT START DATE: ACCOUNT CLOSE DATE: Acct close date here NVOICE DATF INVOICE# :HECK DAT] CHECK# DISTRIBUTED TO DEBIT DEPOSIT Balance Unpaid Invoices 12/23/2020 149 VRB $ 2,500.00 2/10/2021 21-52 3/23/2021 1317 DOLPH $ 833.75 2/12/2021 65648 3/23/2021 1322 K&B $ 625.00 3/11/2021 67263 5/5/2021 1331 K&B $ 1,425.00 3/12/2021 21-56 4/8/2021 1324 DOLPH $ 797.50 3/18/2021 F4979.02-01 5/5/2021 1329 FPC $ 1,610.00 4/14/2021 162 VRB $ 2,791.25 4/15/2021 68116 K&B $ 275.00 5/11/2021 165 VRB $ 275.00 4/26/2021 F4979.02-02 FPC $ 280.00 $ 5,846.25 $ 5,566.25 -$280.00 $ 555.00 DRy fi 0 4 LP ti W e .4�� t� �u� �7. 19 1 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK MAYOR 938 King Street, Rye Brook, N.Y. 10573 ADMINISTRATOR Paul S. Rosenberg (914) 939-0753 I Fax (914) 939-5801 Christopher J. Bradbury www.ryebrook.org TRUSTEES SUPERINTENDENT Susan R. Epstein OF PUBLIC WORKS Stephanie J. Fischer Michal Nowak David M. Heiser Jason A. Klein May 5,2021 Daniel Marks &Yael Marks 18 Hillandale Road Rye Brook, New York 10573 Re: Planning Board Escrow Account for 18 Hillandalc Road Dear Daniel Marks &Yael Marks, Your project currently has a negative balance. Please submit payment to the Village of Rye Brook, the sum of $275.00 (two hundred seventy five dollars) as soon as possible. The spread sheet outlining invoices is attached for your review. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, ^14144- Michal J. Nowak Superintendent of Public Works Ag enclosures PROJECT ADDRESS 18 HILLANDALE PROJECT NAME MARKS ACCOUNT# ACCOUNT START DATE. ACCOUNT CLOSE DATE. Acct close date here INVOICE DATE INVOICE# CHECK DATE CHECK# DISTRIBUTED TO DEBIT DEPOSIT Balance 12/23/2020 149 VRB $ 2,500.00 2/10/2021 21-52 3/23/2021 1317 DOLPH $ 833.75 2/12/2021 65648 3123/2021 1322 K&B $ 625.00 3/11/2021 67263 K&B $ 1,425.00 3/12/2021 21-56 4/8/2021 1324 DOLPH $ 797.50 3/18/2021 F4979.02-01 FPC $ 1,610.00 4/14/2021 162 VRB $ 2,791.25 4/15/2021 68116 K&B $ 275.00 $ 5,566.25 $ 5,291.25 -$275.00 OV 4i y�'i YG I�VV VV�,V i� 19 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK MAYOR 938 King Street, Rye Brook, N.Y. 10573 ADMINISTRATOR Paul S. Rosenberg (914) 939-0753 /Fax (914) 939-5801 Christopher J. Bradbury www.ryebrook.org TRUSTEES SUPERINTENDENT Susan R. Epstein OF PUBLIC WORKS Stephanie J Fischer Michal Nowak David M. Heiser Jason A. Klein Daniel Marks&Yael Marks April 5, 2021 18 Hillandale Road Rye Brook,New York 10573 Re: I'lanning Board Escrow Account for 18 Hillandale Road Dear Daniel Marks&Yael Marks, Your project currently has a negative balance. Please submit payment to the Village of RN-e Brook, the sum of$2,791.25 (two thousand seven hundred ninety one dollars and twenty five cents) as soon as possible. The spread sheet outlining invoices is attached for vour review. "Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, A�// ^0404- �a Michal J. Nowak Superintendent of Public Works /tg / enclosures v PROJECT ADDRESS 18 HILLANDALE_ PROJECT NAME _ MARKS ACCOUNTS ACCOUNT START DATE: ACCOUNT CLOSE DATE: Aoct dose data Mrs INVOICE DATE INVOICE f CHECK DATE CHECK 0 DISTRIBUTED TO DEBIT DEPOSIT Selena Unpaid Involves 12/232020 149 VRB S 2,500.00 2/102021 21-52 3232021 1317 DOLPH S 833.75 2/122021 65648 3232021 1322 K&B S 625.00 3/112021 67263 K&B S 1.425.00 3/122021 21-56 DOLPH S 797.50 3/182021 F4979.02-01 FPC S 1.610.00 S 5,291 25 $ 2 500 00 -$2,791.25 $ 3.832.50 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK MAYOR 938 King Street,Rye Brook, N.Y. 10573 ADMINISTRATOR Paul S. Rosenberg (914) 939-0753 Christopher J. Bradbury voww.Q}ebrook.org TRUSTEES SUPERINTENDENT Susan R Epstein OF PUBLIC WORKS Stephanie J. Fischer Michal Nowak David M. Heiser Jason A. Mein September 24,2021 Daniel Marks &Yael Marks 18 Hillandale Road Rye Brook, New York 10573 Re: Planning Board Escrow Account for 18 Hillandale Road Dear Daniel Marks &Yael Marks: Your project escrow account currently has a negative balance which must be brought up to date. Please deposit with the Village, the sum of$100.00 (one hundred dollars) as soon as possible. The spread sheet outlining invoices is attached for your review. Thank you for your attention to this matter. The applicable section of Village Code requiring payment of professional fees by the applicant is included on the next page for your review and convenience. Sincerely, Tara A. Gerardi Secretary, Planning Board, Zoning Board of Appeals & Architectural Review Board Cc: Michal Nowak, Superintendent of Public Works Enclosures 1 § 47-2. Escrow accounts. [Adopted by the Board of Trustees of the Village of Rye Brook 8-9-1994 by L.L. No. 9-1994;amended in its entirety 10-27-2020 by L.L. No. 9-2020. Subsequent amendments noted where applicable.] A. An escrow account to pay such consultant's fees may be required where the Village deems it necessary to retain a consultant regarding the application for the following applications: (1)Applications requesting an interpretation of any provision of the Village Code; (2)Site plan applications in accordance with Chapter 209; (3) Special use permit applications in accordance with�250-6H; (4)Variance applications in accordance with 5 250-13; (5) Subdivision applications in accordance with Chapter 219; (6)Architectural review in accordance with Chapter 8; (7) Erosion and sediment control permit in accordance with Chapter 118; (8) Floodplain development permit in accordance with Chapter 130; (9) Steep slopes work permit in accordance with Chapter 213; (10)Permits to perform any regulated activity in a wetland in accordance with Chapter 245; (11)Tree removal appeal in accordance with Chapter 235;and (12)Any other application where the Village deems it necessary to retain a consultant regarding the application. B.The applicant shall submit a separate check in an amount to be determined by the Village Administrator or Superintendent of Public Works/Village Engineer,but not less than $250 nor more than$2,500, to be used to establish an escrow account, from which withdrawals shall be made to reimburse the Village for the costs of professional review services. C.The applicant skull be provided with copies of any Village invoice for such services as they are submitted to the Village.All costs charged to the applicant shall be those reasonable and necessary to the decision making function of the reviewing board as set/defined in §47-1B. D.The applicant shall be required, from time to time, to deliver additional funds to the Village for deposit in the escrow account if such additional funds are required to pay for professional consultation services rendered to the Village or anticipated to be rendered.This amount shall be determined by the reviewing board or the Superintendent of Public Works/Village Engineer based on an evaluation of the nature and complexity of the application. E. If such account is not replenished within 30 days after the applicant is notified,in writing,of the requirement for such additional deposit,the reviewing Board may suspend its review of the application. An application shall be deemed incomplete if any amount shall be outstanding. 2 F.In the event that any application before any Board or department is withdrawn prior to any actions being taken,the applicant is nevertheless responsible for any expenses incurred by the Village with regard to said application prior to such withdrawal. G.A deposit in escrow may be required at any stage in the application process,including but not limited to preapplication discussions with the applicant. H.The applicant shall be provided with copies of any invoice for consultant fees as they are submitted to the Village and with Village staff time records for services for which reimbursement is sought. I.Escrow funds shall be refunded to the applicant when the applicant formally withdraws the application from consideration by the permitting authority or when the applicant receives a final determination from the permitting authority;in either case,all reimbursable charges incurred by the Village shall be first deducted from the escrow account,leaving an unencumbered balance that is not required by the permitting authority to pay consulting costs attributable to the application. Fees collected in accordance with the Village Code shall not be refunded.After all pertinent costs have been paid,the Village shall refund to the applicant any funds remaining in the escrow account within 30 days from the date of the final determination issued by permitting authority or from the date the applicant notifies the Village,in writing, of the withdrawal of the application. If the applicant is indebted to the Village for any fees, the amount of money still owed shall be added to the real property Village tax of the property and shall become a lien against the property if not paid within 30 days of written demand. J.A building permit nor certificate of occupancy or use shall not be issued unless all professional review fees charged in connection with the applicant's project have been paid by the applicant.In no case shall a building permit or certificate of occupancy be issued to the applicant if the applicant is indebted to the Village for any professional review fees in excess of the escrow. K.The imposition of escrow account fees are in addition to,and not in place of, other fee schedules currently in force. 3 PRO ECTADDRESS 18 HILLA.NDAI.E PRO CTNAME MARKS ACCOUNT# ACCOUNT START DATE: ACCOUNT CLOSE DATE: Aces eldse dale here INVOICE DATE INVOICE#r-HF-CKDATIE CHECK# DISTRIBUTED TO DEBIT DEPOSIT Balance jUnpaidlnvoices 12/23/2020 149 VRB $ 2,500.00 2/10/2021 21-52 3/23/2021 1317 DOLPH $ 833.75 2/12/2021 65648 3/23/2021 1322 K&B $ 625.00 3/11/2021 67263 5/5/2021 1331 K&B $ 1,425.00 3/12/2021 21-56 4/8/2021 1324 DOLPH $ 797.50 3/18/2021 F4979.02-01 5/5/2021 1329 FPC $ 1,610.00 4/14/2021 162 VRB $ 2,791.25 4/15/2021 68116 7/19/2021 1348 K&B $ 275.00 5/11/2021 165 VRB $ 275.00 4/26/2021 F4979.02-02 7/7/2021 1340 FPC $ 280.00 6/15/2021 168 VRB $ 280.00 9/14/2021 72-554 K&B 5 100.00 $ 5,946.25 $ 5,946.25 4300.00 $ 100.00 Qy� BAR 4 p U. d,�� 2-la ti .4 L��Cti;J1v 406 annivma}aj VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK MAYOR 938 King Street, Rye Brook,N.Y. 10573 ADMINISTRATOR Jason A.Klein (914) 939-0753 Christopher J.Bradbury www.ryebrook.or� TRUSTEES SUPERINTENDENT Susan R.Epstein OF PUBLIC WORKS Stephanie J. Fischer Michal Nowak David M. Heiser Salvatore W.Morlino July 14,2022 Daniel Marks &Yael Marks 18 Hillandale Road Rye Brook,New York 10573 Re: Planning Board Escrow Account for 18 Hillandale Road Dear Daniel Marks &Yael Marks: Your project escrow account currently has a negative balance which must be brought up to date. Please deposit with the Village, the sum of $4,705.00 as soon as possible. Our office may have not received the final invoices for this application, however a spread sheet outlining invoices is attached for your review. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, Tara A. Orlando Secretary,Planning Board, Zoning Board of Appeals & Architectural Review Board Cc: Michal Nowak, Superintendent of Public Works Enclosure PROJECTADDRESS 18 HILLANDALE PROJECT NAME MARKS ACCOUNT# ACCOUNT START DATE: ACCOUNT CLOSE DATE: Acct close elate here INVOICE DATE INVOICE# CHECK DATE CHECK# DISTRIBUTED TO DEBIT DEPOSIT Balance Unpaid Invoices 12/23/2020 149 VRB $ 2,500.00 2/10/2021 21-52 3/23/2021 1317 DOLPH $ 833.75 2/12/2021 65648 3/23/2021 1322 K&B $ 625.00 3/11/2021 67263 5/5/2021 1331 K&B $ 1,425.00 3/12/2021 21-56 4/8/2021 1324 DOLPH $ 797.50 3/18/2021 F4979.02-01 5/5/2021 1329 FPC $ 1,610.00 4/14/2021 162 VRB $ 2,791.25 4/15/2021 68116 7/19/2021 1348 K&B $ 275.00 5/11/2021 165 VRB $ 275.00 4/26/2021 F4979.02-02 7/7/2021 1340 FPC $ 280.00 6/15/2021 168 VRB $ 280.00 9/14/2021 72554 10/22/2021 1368 K&B $ 100.00 10/4/2021 179 VRB $ 100.00 1/21/2022 188 VRB $ 2,500.00 2/13/2022 76719 3/8/2022 1395 K&B $ 50.00 3/15/2022 79384 4/7/2022 1398 K&B $ 1,500.00 4/11/2022 80076 5/5/2022 1403 K&B $ 900.00 5/12/2022 80861 K&B $ 925.00 6/15/2022 F4979.02-03 FPC $ 2,755.00 6/20/2022 81946 K&B $ 1,075.00 $ 13,151.25 $ 8,446.25 -$4,705.00 $ 4,755.00 Mike Izzo From: Mike Izzo Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2022 9:43 AM To: Daniel Marks Cc: Steven Fews;Tara Orlando; Laura Petersen; Michal Nowak Subject: RE: Site Plan Discrepancy Attachments: 18 Hillandale Approved Revised Plans 8.13.21.pdf, 18 Hillandale As-Built 12.10.22.pdf Dear Mr. Marks, Upon review of your as-built topographic property survey, we noted a significant discrepancy between the new survey and the approved topographic plans. I have attached and highlighted copies of both the survey and approved plan hereto for your convenience. As the approved plan shows, the site grading and drainage was designed such that the lowest elevation at the infiltration basin should be at elevation 158. However, the new survey lists the elevation here at 160, making the infiltration basin 2 feet shallower than designed. Unfortunately, this discrepancy is beyond the scope of my authority to accept as a simple field condition change. Please arrange for the infiltration basin to be re-built such to be in compliance with the approved plans, or provide the applications, fees, and documentation necessary to re-appear before the Planning Board for an amended site plan review. Thank you. c�iae�(l /zzo Building& Fire Inspector Village of Rye Brook, NY (914) 939-0668 From: Daniel Marks<dan.marks13@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, December 13, 2022 3:15 PM To: Mike Izzo<Mlzzo@ryebrook.org> Cc:Steven Fews<SteveFews@ryebrook.org>;Tara Orlando<torlando@ryebrook.org>; Laura Petersen <LPetersen@ryebrook.org>; Michal Nowak<MNowak@ryebrook.org> Subject: Re: Expired T.C.O. Thank you very much. We will do our best to get this closed out as soon as possible. Dan On Tue, Dec 13,2022 at 8:40 AM Mike Izzo<Mlzzo@rvebrook.ors>wrote: Dear Mr. Marks, Building Department records indicate that you have four (4) months of permit extension time remaining. In the interest of finalizing your project, your request for a short extension is granted. Please note the new permit expiration date is April 13, 2023. n B c CERTIFICATION: TOWN OF RYE rah Surveyof lot situate in the Village of Rye Brook, RONALD PERSAUD, L.S. Town of Rye, Count of Westchester and State of New York, �4-Map LAND SURVEYOR shown and y designated as Lot Nos. 6 and 7 on a certain Map ; " -Subdivision M of B am Ridge",, situated 15 South Tenth Ave entitled Amended Re S p Yr 9 ' Village of Rye Brook, Town of Rye, Westchester County, New York, y�- = MOUNT VERNON,N.Y. 10550 the Office of the Count Clerk of Westchester County, 1 .Wl= .15^CIA Tele (914) 523-5808 and filed in Y Q Division of Land Records on November 21, 1925 as Ma No. 2931. Q S5 p �'`� Email:ronaldpersoud1510�mail.com o� _ . Area=44 491 s .ft. 1.02acres � ;'oJ`y� � "aF NE Block 1, Lot 39 Rye Brook Tax Maps q n'�j w 10 2022 v 06 CV �P �p Pe, �o Surveyed. November 28, 2020 Survey Updated. DecemberCD sec �57: 5 CO �A RS l� 155.6 * O 9G .157.41 .158.41 �k "Ma Wetland Boundary r- 's 24' '-~ n O '' �6 �` -\ ' 159.73. 160.E iP- P Ro Z�� �slog, ,' plllwo 27 O ♦'4»Map'15a• :,r01�' 161.5 -162- L A N 1� 5 8» �y it1 16�fi .�6N92"��ogo�ain 163'59 RONALD PERSAUD,N.Y.S. LIC. No. 051087 b�58.88' �� : J." 1y Inlet a 16p Map ♦ / 1 �0lee5 5.32 �� ,., le 6 � o od 6°a ocE o ' - p �° �P-R aof 5 .0 .1 5 top »T I way ` 6.52 -Q oT 71 ' 60.54 163.53' 167 A 4 �Q. 3 G oss 6 g8. �o.o '� C ��`• Cuitec Recharge 6 5g- 16 •7 67.31 330XLHD INFIL.+ 23• ' �. G , ---Ir---T---1--- 166.69 ce a op ,�� ♦ % _1_'2_ 3_ 70. a en s ' % 7.2 0. - / e 161.59 62� F 4 + 5 1 6_� �9 769 26 7 Wetland Boundor. -�. �._7_-�.----�• - --------- L---�--- - to P ` 8»T 164---� ; 70.16 0° 6` LOT rJ 0. t� fence 0 16 t & Rail Fen B`N169:32► lag Gore 169.6§ 3' pos -7o eC dub 0.2 17 170.09 i 7 169.02' enc 0s. -170.96 CD .167.73 Ivat ` 17 A Metal s one all roppane 170.03 Hl9h 70,72 et. W ndgrnd 1.87 It 6 a170.1 71.1 1 O 0.1 leanout Stepping pram •� 179.oa 172.78 15»Map Stone ood DeCkd. 24"Ma vY P O L)n J 170.63, 170.52 Flag do 173.93 17 171.40 1-14.51 7'to .170.41 170.67 1 Sty Ga 17159 C Grass Cond B°y �___Stof y ? 172• 2 \� .172.840 ' 7 Ced AG pond ���' �� GQr°ge 3 36"Map Chlm w e11 v'(1d' 0 D 42 i "Ced 24'Map nd HSe.Na•�8 ,Si117853 F1�A-7 00 7 (� 175 Qom 17 .174.50 ed -T '4 C ` » .173.91 17a 47• i°'" m 7»Hem 178 22 Map Plante;, 12 M,6p a \ 18"Map 7»T 0 Map G .. a 18 a.o5 P\at o- ' O Q)8-T Planter / p eb ® 24"Map 1 »T %11 a �` ` 17a _ wC3lk 6t i 2 , ® .177.19 24 Map t 179.38 pping 1 17?flog 6 ` o �� . .• � ` ones � .179.08 - --- \O p(\ 6 - Grass \,��, `.1 ® 183.72 7.T AO �`\ 7 Hem \�o� i 30"M z , -�o P �O'� 'J• 0 8 Grass ; Planter ��G 0 4 0 �Q7j-\ 3 ® 6 & 181.52, `� a- L �178.85 1 Je o� Grass R , , 7" ♦..� rn Gu< 66 , �® 16 T 1 el3'T C an 62.98 i 180.79- ' ``��8 i csl ® "Ma 2 �c+� " p p C�® '�7'18 Ma 'Mop �- 183.48 ; 18 ` .� ECEFYIE 190 �1ock ; 2 _ O."� p e m 0 O ®®® --- 8-T � � 1 1> 5 1 7'L - 3 � 50 > ® ® - [� A o-Mop DEC 16 2U2 NIL A I �84 1g . D4LE 86 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK L� e � BUILDING DEPARTME Macada NT 1 urb m Roadway BC188.35 BC186.97� Y Macadam W.) (50' Wide R.O. INDEX:COO-092 ' As In Possession" Surveyed:November 14, 2021 0 scale: 1"=2 0' MopDrafted:November 18 2021 SurveyUpdated: December 10 2022 Surve ed Please arrange for all work to be completed and successfully inspected, and for all paperwork& fees to be remitted to the Village such to facilitate the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy/Certificate of Compliance closing out the permit on or before that date. Please note that this is the final permit extension available from the Building Department. In accordance with Village Code §250-10.A., it is a violation to use or occupy or to allow the use or occupancy of any building, premises, or part thereof without a Certificate of Occupancy duly issued by the Building Inspector. Thank you. 1011c4011(7' /zzo Building& Fire Inspector Village of Rye Brook, NY (914) 939-0668 From: Daniel Marks<dan.marks13@Rmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, December 13, 2022 8:26 AM To: Mike Izzo<MlzzoCu@ryebrook.ore> Cc:Steven Fews<SteveFews@ryebrook.ore>;Tara Orlando<torlando@rvebrook.ore>; Laura Petersen <LPetersen@ryebrook.ore>; Michal Nowak<MNowak@ryebrook.ors> Subject: Re: Expired T.C.O. Dear Mr. Izzo, I am writing to request another short extension to our building permit,which expires today. The as-built survey was done this weekend, and the surveyor tells me he should have it by tomorrow. Thanks very much, Daniel Marks On Tue, Dec 6, 2022 at 6:41 PM Daniel Marks<dan.marks13@gmail.com>wrote: I Hi all- 2 As of today: - Pool fence modification done and approved 10/3/22 - New variable speed pump and noise-cancelling cover installed and approved 10/3/22 - Landscaping/screening on pool area interior and along property line installed and approved 10/24/22 - Improvements to retention basin and installation of impermeable liner near property line ongoing installed and approved 11/15/22 - Fencing/screening surrounding pool equipment installed and approved 11/15/22 - Regrading/clearing of fill along property line completed and approved 12/6/22 The earliest our surveyor can come out is Saturday to complete the as-built survey. Hopefully we should have it in hand shortly thereafter. I will be in touch early next week. Thanks again, Dan Marks On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 3:36 PM Mike Izzo<Mlzzo@ryebrook.org>wrote: Dear Mr. Marks, Upon review of your file, I see the permit is slated to expire on 12/13/22. Monday's date is 12/5/22. If after 12/12/22 you are still unable to close the permit, please contact me and I will consider another short extension. Thank you. 3 lffk Qa C U, �ZZO Building& Fire Inspector Village of Rye Brook, NY (914) 939-0668 From: Daniel Marks<dan.marks13@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2022 S:36 AM To: Daniel Marks<dan.marks13@gmail.com> Cc: Mike Izzo <Mlzzo@rvebrook.org>; Steven Fews<SteveFews@ryebrook.org>; Tara Orlando <torlando@ryebrook.org>; Laura Petersen<LPetersen@ryebrook.org>; Michal Nowak <MNowak@rvebrook.org> Subject: Re: Expired T.C.O. Our final set of work was unfortunately delayed over the thanksgiving holiday, but I'm told it should be complete by the end of this week, and that we should be ready for final inspections on Monday. May I please request another short extension to our building permit to finalize this work, and complete post- construction survey once complete? Thanks very much, Daniel Marks On Nov 15, 2022, at 4:10 PM, Daniel Marks<dan.marks13@gmail.com>wrote: Short update. As of today: - Pool fence modification done and approved 10/3/22 - New variable speed pump and noise-cancelling cover installed and approved 10/3/22 - Landscaping/screening on pool area interior and along property line installed and approved 10/24/22 - Improvements to retention basin and installation of impermeable liner near property line ongoing installed and approved 11/15/22 - Fencing/screening surrounding pool equipment installed and approved 11/15/22 4 Mr. Nowak identified some areas today that need to be regraded per the approved plans. Our contractors have told us they can complete this work tomorrow morning. Thanks again, Dan Marks On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 12:39 PM Daniel Marks <dan.marks13@gmail.com>wrote: Dear Mr. Izzo, I wanted to provide a short update where we stand with the work at 18 Hillandale. Pool fence modification done and approved 10/3/22 New variable speed pump and noise-cancelling cover installed and approved 10/3/22 - Landscaping/screening on pool area interior and along property line installed and approved 10/24/22 - Improvements to retention basin and installation of impermeable liner near property line ongoing, site visit today. Expected completion within 2-3 days. - Fencing/screening surrounding pool equipment-to be installed upon completion of the retention basin modifications, expected 1 day work. I am cautiously optimistic that we will be in a position to request complete inspection of the project next week and move towards closing this permit. Thanks very much for your continued patience, Dan Marks On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 5:40 PM Daniel Marks<dan.marks13@gmail.com>wrote: 5 Thanks very much, Mr. Izzo. I will keep you posted on progress with the hope to be able to close the project as soon as possible. Dan Marks On Oct 6, 2022, at 10:34 AM, Mike Izzo<mizzo@ryebrook.org>wrote: Dear Mr. Marks, Thank you for the email. I am inclined to partially grant your request as the code allows for two extensions of up to six months each. Since your projected completion date is one month, I will approve a two (2) month extension at this time making the new permit expiration date 12/3/22. If at the end of the 2-month extension you require more time, you will still have 4 months available should you need it. To that end, please arrange for all work to be completed and successfully inspected, and for all paperwork & fees to be remitted to the Village such to facilitate the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy/Certificate of Compliance closing out the permit on or before December 13, 2022. Thank you. IfflAW11!l /zzo Building& Fire Inspector Village of Rye Brook, NY (914) 939-0668 6 From: Daniel Marks <dan.marks13@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, October S, 2022 3:11 PM To: Mike Izzo <Mlzzo@rvebrook.org> Cc: Steven Fews<SteveFews@ rye brook.org>; Tara Orlando <torlando@rvebrook.org>; Laura Petersen <LPetersen@rvebrook.org>; Drew Gamils<dgamils@kblaw.com>; Christopher Bradbury<CBradburv@ryebrook.org>; Michal Nowak<MNowak@rvebrook.org> Subject: Re: Expired T.C.O. Hi Mr. Izzo - Unfortunately the weather this week has delayed work here. I am writing to request a second six-month permit extension. I anticipate that all work should be complete before the end of the month. Thanks very much, Daniel Marks On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 12:12 PM Daniel Marks<dan.marks13@gmail.com> wrote: Thanks very much, Mr. Izzo. Just to keep you updated here, we have scheduled an inspection for Monday afternoon for the fence and pool pump cover. My contractors are telling me that they estimate that by Thursday 10/6, the retention basin improvements should be ready for review as well. Depending on the progress with plant delivery, I will be in contact next week if we need to request an additional permit extension. Thank you again and have a nice weekend. Dan Marks On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 9:31 AM Mike Izzo <Mlzzo@rvebrook.org>wrote: Dear Mr. Marks, Thank you for your timely response. Please note that Village Code does allow for two (2) six-month permit extensions should you require additional time to complete the project. Your 1st permit extension is set to expire on October 13, 2022. Please let us know your intentions regarding a final permit extension before that date. Regarding the completed/pending work, please be sure to call the Building Department for inspections as work is completed so your file can be maintained up to date. Please schedule an inspection this week for the fence and pool sound attenuation cover. Thank you. Xt �ae1(7, Izzo Building & Fire Inspector Village of Rye Brook, NY (914) 939-0668 From: Daniel Marks <dan.marks13@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2022 8:19 AM To: Mike Izzo <Mlzzo@ryebrook.org> Cc: Steven Fews <SteveFews@ rye brook.org>; Tara Orlando <torlando@ryebrook.org>; Laura Petersen <LPetersen@ryebrook.org>; Drew Gamils<dgamils@kblaw.com>; Christopher Bradbury <CBradbury@ryebrook.org>; Michal Nowak<MNowak@ rye brook.org> Subject: Re: Expired T.C.O. Hi Mr. Izzo - Thanks very much for your note. Understood on the expiry of the TCO and use of the pool. We will not use the pool and we will not apply for a third TCO. Here's where remaining work stands for the completion of the work: New pump installation and noise-cancelling cover: complete - Fence modification: complete 8 - Rain garden modifications: work to start Friday (tomorrow). Estimated time to complete: 3-4 days - New planting per plan amendments: late next week or early week of Oct 3. Estimated time to complete: 1-2 days - Enclosure (fencing) for pool mechanical: parts have been ordered, installation is late next week or early week of Oct 3. Estimated time to complete: 1 day We've had some delays with our contractors unfortunately on the rain garden modifications, but they are telling me they will begin work tomorrow. Just to clarify, in the event things are delayed further, would we be able to apply for a second extension of the building permit?Your previous email on this issue (March 16) had mentioned the possibility of two six-month extensions. Thanks very much, Daniel Marks On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 11:38 AM Mike Izzo <Mlzzo@ryebrook.org>wrote: Dear Mr. Marks, As you know,your Temporary Certificate of Occupancy issued on August 17, 2022, allowing you and your family to use your swimming pool is now expired. As such I must insist that you refrain from using or allowing anyone else to use your swimming pool as it is a violation of Village Code to use or allow the use of such without a C/O or T.C/O. Please note that failure to comply with this directive will result in the issuance of a Stop Work Order and Notice of Violation and may result in a summons for you to appear before a Judge in Rye Town Court. As per our prior conversations it was my understanding that under the protection of the T.C/O you intended to initiate or perhaps complete some of the outstanding items listed on the Planning Board's Approval Resolution dated 7/28/22. A copy of that approval resolution is attached hereto for your convenience. However, to our knowledge the only item completed in the past month is the installation of the new pool pump. 9 May I further remind you that the six-month extension granted to your pool permit is set to expire on October 17, 2022. Unless the work is completed by then, your permit will expire in violation of Village Code, and you will be liable for the $500 Expired Permit Fee to reinstate the permit for a final six-month extension during which time all outstanding PB Resolution items must be completed and successfully inspected. Please respond in writing with your intentions regarding the expired T.C/O, the continued use of the swimming pool, the pending permit expiration, and with an acceptable projected work itinerary to finalize the entire scope of work. To avoid a Notice of Violation, please respond accordingly to this email by no later than Wednesday, September 28, 2022. Thank you. IffWael(l /zzo Building& Fire Inspector Village of Rye Brook, NY (914) 939-0668 10 Mike Izzo From: Mike Izzo Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2022 8:41 AM To: Daniel Marks Cc: Steven Fews;Tara Orlando; Laura Petersen; Michal Nowak Subject: RE: Expired T.C.O. Dear Mr. Marks, Building Department records indicate that you have four (4) months of permit extension time remaining. In the interest of finalizing your project, your request for a short extension is granted. Please note the new permit expiration date is April 13, 2023. Please arrange for all work to be completed and successfully inspected, and for all paperwork & fees to be remitted to the Village such to facilitate the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy/Certificate of Compliance closing out the permit on or before that date. Please note that this is the final permit extension available from the Building Department. In accordance with Village Code §250-1o.A., it is a violation to use or occupy or to allow the use or occupancy of any building, premises, or part thereof without a Certificate of Occupancy duly issued by the Building Inspector. Thank you. Ac4adcZ /zzo Building& Fire Inspector Village of Rye Brook, NY (914) 939-0668 From: Daniel Marks<dan.marksl3@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, December 13, 2022 8:26 AM To: Mike Izzo<Mlzzo@ryebrook.org> Cc:Steven Fews<Steve Fews @rye b rook.o rg>;Tara Orlando<torlando@ryebrook.org>; Laura Petersen <LPetersen@ryebrook.org>; Michal Nowak<MNowak@ryebrook.org> Subject: Re: Expired T.C.O. Dear Mr. Izzo, I am writing to request another short extension to our building permit,which expires today. The as-built survey was done this weekend,and the surveyor tells me he should have it by tomorrow. Thanks very much, Daniel Marks On Tue, Dec 6, 2022 at 6:41 PM Daniel Marks<dan.marks13@gmail.com>wrote: Hi all- As of today: - Pool fence modification done and approved 10/3/22 1 New variable speed pump and noise-cancelling cover installed and approved 10/3/22 Landscaping/screening on pool area interior and along property line installed and approved 10/24/22 - Improvements to retention basin and installation of impermeable liner near property line ongoing installed and approved 11/15/22 - Fencing/screening surrounding pool equipment installed and approved 11/15/22 - Regrading/clearing of fill along property line completed and approved 12/6/22 The earliest our surveyor can come out is Saturday to complete the as-built survey. Hopefully we should have it in hand shortly thereafter. I will be in touch early next week. Thanks again, Dan Marks On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 3:36 PM Mike Izzo<Mlzzo@rvebrook.org>wrote: Dear Mr. Marks, Upon review of your file, I see the permit is slated to expire on 12/13/22. Monday's date is 12/5/22. If after 12/12/22 you are still unable to close the permit, please contact me and I will consider another short extension. Thank you. lffl�4ae1(7, /zzo Building & Fire Inspector Village of Rye Brook, NY (914) 939-0668 From: Daniel Marks<dan.marks13@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2022 5:36 AM To: Daniel Marks<dan.marks13@gmaiI.com> Cc: Mike Izzo<Mlzzo@ryebrook.org>; Steven Fews<SteveFews@ryebrook.org>; Tara Orlando <torlando@rvebrook.org>; Laura Petersen <LPetersen@rvebrook.org>; Michal Nowak<MNowak@ryebrook.org> Subject: Re: Expired T.C.O. 2 Our final set of work was unfortunately delayed over the thanksgiving holiday, but I'm told it should be complete by the end of this week, and that we should be ready for final inspections on Monday. May I please request another short extension to our building permit to finalize this work, and complete post- construction survey once complete? Thanks very much, Daniel Marks On Nov 15, 2022, at 4:10 PM, Daniel Marks<dan.marks13@gmail.com>wrote: Short update. As of today: Pool fence modification done and approved 10/3/22 New variable speed pump and noise-cancelling cover installed and approved 10/3/22 - Landscaping/screening on pool area interior and along property line installed and approved 10/24/22 - Improvements to retention basin and installation of impermeable liner near property line ongoing installed and approved 11/15/22 - Fencing/screening surrounding pool equipment installed and approved 11/15/22 Mr. Nowak identified some areas today that need to be regraded per the approved plans. Our contractors have told us they can complete this work tomorrow morning. Thanks again, Dan Marks On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 12:39 PM Daniel Marks<dan.marks13@gmail.com>wrote: Dear Mr. Izzo, 3 I wanted to provide a short update where we stand with the work at 18 Hillandale. Pool fence modification done and approved 10/3/22 New variable speed pump and noise-cancelling cover installed and approved 10/3/22 Landscaping/screening on pool area interior and along property line installed and approved 10/24/22 - Improvements to retention basin and installation of impermeable liner near property line ongoing, site visit today. Expected completion within 2-3 days. Fencing/screening surrounding pool equipment-to be installed upon completion of the retention basin modifications, expected 1 day work. I am cautiously optimistic that we will be in a position to request complete inspection of the project next week and move towards closing this permit. Thanks very much for your continued patience, Dan Marks On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 5:40 PM Daniel Marks<dan.marks13@gmail.com>wrote: Thanks very much, Mr. Izzo. I will keep you posted on progress with the hope to be able to close the project as soon as possible. Dan Marks On Oct 6, 2022, at 10:34 AM, Mike Izzo <mizzo@ryebrook.org>wrote: Dear Mr. Marks, Thank you for the email. 4 I am inclined to partially grant your request as the code allows for two extensions of up to six months each. Since your projected completion date is one month, I will approve a two (2) month extension at this time making the new permit expiration date 12/3/22. If at the end of the 2-month extension you require more time, you will still have 4 months available should you need it. To that end, please arrange for all work to be completed and successfully inspected, and for all paperwork & fees to be remitted to the Village such to facilitate the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy/Certificate of Compliance closing out the permit on or before December 13, 2022. Thank you. lffl and 11 /zzo Building& Fire Inspector Village of Rye Brook, NY (914) 939-0668 From: Daniel Marks<dan.marksl3@gmail.com> Sent:Wednesday, October 5, 2022 3:11 PM To: Mike Izzo<Mlzzo@ryebrook.ore> Cc:Steven Fews<SteveFews@ rye brook.ore>;Tara Orlando <torlando@ryebrook.ore>; Laura Petersen<LPetersen@ryebrook.ore>; Drew Gamils<deamils@kblaw.com>; Christopher Bradbury<CBradbury@ryebrook.ore>; Michal Nowak<MNowak@ryebrook.org> Subject: Re: Expired T.C.O. Hi Mr. Izzo- Unfortunately the weather this week has delayed work here. I am writing to request a second six-month permit extension. I anticipate that all work should be complete before the end of the month. 5 Thanks very much, Daniel Marks On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 12:12 PM Daniel Marks<dan.marks13@gmail.com>wrote: Thanks very much, Mr. Izzo. Just to keep you updated here, we have scheduled an inspection for Monday afternoon for the fence and pool pump cover. My contractors are telling me that they estimate that by Thursday 10/6,the retention basin improvements should be ready for review as well. Depending on the progress with plant delivery, I will be in contact next week if we need to request an additional permit extension. Thank you again and have a nice weekend. Dan Marks On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 9:31 AM Mike Izzo<Mlzzo@►yebrook.org>wrote: Dear Mr. Marks, Thank you for your timely response. Please note that Village Code does allow for two (2)six-month permit extensions should you require additional time to complete the project. Your 1st permit extension is set to expire on October 13, 2022. Please let us know your intentions regarding a final permit extension before that date. Regarding the completed/pending work,please be sure to call the Building Department for inspections as work is completed so your file can be maintained up to date. Please schedule an inspection this week for the fence and pool sound attenuation cover. Thank you. lffl��ad(T Izzo 6 Building & Fire Inspector Village of Rye Brook, NY (914) 939-0668 From: Daniel Marks<dan.marks13@9mail.com> Sent:Thursday, September 22, 2022 8:19 AM To: Mike Izzo <Mlzzo@rvebrook.org> Cc: Steven Fews<SteveFews@ryebrook.org>; Tara Orlando <torlando@ rye brook.org>; Laura Petersen<LPetersen@rvebrook.org>; Drew Gamils<dgamils@kblaw.com>; Christopher Bradbury <CBradbury@rvebrook.org>; Michal Nowak<MNowak@ryebrook.org> Subject: Re: Expired T.C.O. Hi Mr. Izzo- Thanks very much for your note. Understood on the expiry of the TCO and use of the pool. We will not use the pool and we will not apply for a third TCO. Here's where remaining work stands for the completion of the work: New pump installation and noise-cancelling cover: complete Fence modification: complete - Rain garden modifications: work to start Friday(tomorrow). Estimated time to complete: 3-4 days - New planting per plan amendments: late next week or early week of Oct 3. Estimated time to complete: 1-2 days - Enclosure (fencing) for pool mechanical: parts have been ordered, installation is late next week or early week of Oct 3. Estimated time to complete: 1 day We've had some delays with our contractors unfortunately on the rain garden modifications, but they are telling me they will begin work tomorrow. Just to clarify, in the event things are delayed further, would we be able to apply for a second extension of the building permit?Your previous email on this issue (March 16) had mentioned the possibility of two six-month extensions. Thanks very much, Daniel Marks On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 11:38 AM Mike Izzo<Mlzzo@ryebrook.org>wrote: Dear Mr. Marks, As you know,your Temporary Certificate of Occupancy issued on August 17, 2022, allowing you and your family to use your swimming pool is now expired. As such I must insist that you refrain from using or allowing anyone else to use your swimming pool as it is a violation of Village Code to use or allow the use of such without a C/O or T.C/O. Please note that failure to comply with this directive will result in the issuance of a Stop Work Order and Notice of Violation and may result in a summons for you to appear before a Judge in Rye Town Court. As per our prior conversations it was my understanding that under the protection of the T.C/O you intended to initiate or perhaps complete some of the outstanding items listed on the Planning Board's Approval Resolution dated 7/28/22. A copy of that approval resolution is attached hereto for your convenience. However, to our knowledge the only item completed in the past month is the installation of the new pool pump. May I further remind you that the six-month extension granted to your pool permit is set to expire on October 17, 2022. Unless the work is completed by then,your permit will expire in violation of Village Code, and you will be liable for the$500 Expired Permit Fee to reinstate the permit for a final six-month extension during which time all outstanding PB Resolution items must be completed and successfully inspected. Please respond in writing with your intentions regarding the expired T.C/O, the continued use of the swimming pool, the pending permit expiration, and with an acceptable projected work itinerary to finalize the entire scope of work. To avoid a Notice of Violation,please respond accordingly to this email by no later than Wednesday, September 28, 2022. Thank you. 8 �c�iae�(l /zzo Building& Fire Inspector Village of Rye Brook, NY (914) 939-0668 9 Mike Izzo From: Mike Izzo Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2022 10:10 AM To: Drew Gamils Cc: Dan Sherman; Daniel Marks; Michal Nowak; Tara Orlando Subject: 18 Hillandale Pool Barricade (fence) Dear Drew, As discussed earlier, I reached out to Mr. Sherman and to Mr. Marks this morning to discuss the non-code compliant pool barricade depicted on Mr. Sherman's latest plan revision. I was only able to leave a voicemail for Mr. Sherman,but I did speak directly with Mr. Marks. I informed both that although Mr. Sherman is a Registered Landscape Architect, he is not recognized by the State of NY as one qualified to design structures which must comply with the NYSUFP&BC,like a swimming pool barricade. I further informed both that the revised plans will not be forwarded to the Planning Board unless they contain renderings of a NY State Code compliant swimming pool barricade prepared and sealed by a NY State Registered Architect or NY State Licensed Professional Engineer. Upon further discussion with Mr. Marks, he is considering an alternate design which will remove the pool barricade off the wall completely and include the installation of an independent code compliant 4'-0" high pool barricade installed on grade around the retaining wall and the entire pool structure. Please note that Mr. Marks is aware of the pending July 281h Planning Board meeting and will make every attempt to have his design professionals provide satisfactory code compliant revisions in time for that meeting. Thank you. lff l Q4 C (/, �ZZO Building& Fire Inspector Village of Rye Brook, NY (914)939-0668 1 Mike Izzo From: Mike Izzo Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2022 9:02 AM To: Daniel Marks Cc: Yael Marks; Tara Orlando; Laura Petersen; Steven Fews; Drew Gamils Subject: RE: Second TCO Dear Mr. Marks, After conferring with Village Counsel, it has been determined that the Building Department will not be approving any additional T.C/O's for your swimming pool. Once the Planning Board renders their decision and the installation is complete and in compliance with the approved plans and with all Planning Board Resolutions we can move toward the issuance of the final C/O closing out the permit. Thank you. Michael J. Izzo Building&Fire Inspector Village of Rye Brook, NY (914) 939-0668 Original Message From:Tara Orlando <torlando@ryebrook.org> Sent: Thursday,June 23, 2022 7:s3 AM To: Daniel Marks <dan.marks 13@gmail.com> Cc: Yael Marks <yaelmarksmd@gmail.com>;Mike Izzo <MIzzo@ryebrook.org> Subject: RE: Second TCO Good morning Mr. Marks, I am including Michael Izzo, the Building Inspector on this email to answer your questions. Tara Tara A. Orlando Planning Board & Zoning Board of Appeals Secretary Village of Rye Brook 938 King Street Rye Brook,New York 10573 Office(914) 939-0668 Original Message 1 From;Daniel Marks <dan.marks 13@gmail.com> :Sent: Wednesday,June 22, 2022 6:10 AM To: Tara Orlando <torlando@ryebrook.org> Cc: Yael Marks <yaelmarksmd@gmail.com> Subject: Second TCO Hi Tara- Hope all is well. Looks like we will need to apply for a second TCO. Will we need another inspection? If so, just want to time so that we have for July 4th weekend. Thanks vm, Dan Marks z Steven Fews From: Mike Izzo Sent: Monday, October 3, 2022 8:18 AM To: Mark Harmon Subject: RE: Response Requested - 18 Hillandale Rd Hi Mark, Got your call, sorry I couldn't get back to you right away. We have an inspection scheduled at 18 this afternoon to document the current state of affairs and any outstanding items. You can F.O.I.L for the inspection reports if you like. Thanks. AWW1107, /zzo Building& Fire Inspector Village of Rye Brook, NY (914) 939-0668 From: Mark Harmon<harmon.mark53@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, September 30, 2022 11:32 AM To: Drew Victoria Gamils<DGamils@kblaw.com> Cc: Ellen Harmon<ellentharmon@gmail.com>; Michal Nowak<M Nowak@ ryebrook.org>; Mike Izzo <Mlzzo@ryebrook.org>;Tara Orlando<torlando@ryebrook.org>; Christopher Bradbury<CBradbury@ryebrook.org>; David M. Heiser<DHeiser@ryebrook.org> Subject: Re: Response Requested - 18 Hillandale Rd Ms. Gamils: While we appreciate receiving a response to our email, it provides no comfort that we can expect compliance with duly adopted resolutions of the Planning Board at any time in the near future. You state that Mr. Marks is "working to finalize the work on his property and is providing regular updates to the Village about the status of said work"; but the facts bely that statement. Following the Marks's disregard of its original resolution approving their site plan application,the Planning Board approved detailed amended plans, a temporary certificate of occupancy was requested by the Markses and issued after the fence height surrounding the pool was reduced, the Markses were able then to use their pool,AND NO OTHER WORK WAS DONE; none of the required additional screening was planted, no cover was installed on the pool equipment, no construction rubbish was removed from our fence, and no impervious barrier was installed between our properties. Vague assurances that regular updates have been provided for work that is not being done, or that extensions may be sought to complete the work at some unknown date in the future, do not demonstrate a commitment from the Village or its counsel that serious attention is being given to assure compliance. We appreciate that it is customary to rely on the good faith of residents to act in accordance with their obligations, but that has not proven to be a successful course of action here. Flouting yet again the requirements of compliance with an approved site plan application,the Markses were able to enjoy the use of their pool for the duration of the summer without complying with the requirements for that use. So we ask again: what recourse is there if another season goes by(as seems to be happening) without compliance by the Markses, while debris continues to pile up and lean against 1 our fence, and water from the project continues to pour onto our property? We would appreciate your addressing that question, and responding as to what actions the Village may take in the face of continuing non-compliance, including invoking the fine provisions available. Mark and Ellen Harmon Mark A. Harmon (914) 589-9610 On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 4:06 PM Drew Victoria Gamils<DGamils@kblaw.com>wrote: Ms. Harmon, The Building Department has been in touch with Mr. Marks. He is working to finalize the work on his property and is providing regular updates to the Village about the status of said work.The Marks have time to complete the work in accordance with their building permit.They may also request an extension on the building permit if they need additional time to complete the work. They are aware the TCO has expired and will not be applying for another TCO or using their pool anymore. Drew Victoria Gamils Associate KEAN8W1BEANEPc. ATTORNEYS AT LAW Nidti•Ficcic.l I.w Finn.S"gular0iml K,;ii.• Serving the Hudson Valley and Beyond for over 40 Years 445 Hamilton Avenue, Suite 1500 White Plains, NY 10601 (914) 946-4777 Ext: 344 (914) 946-6868 (Fax) DGamils@kblaw.com www.kblaw.com Follow us on Twitter Follow us on Facebook Follow us on LinkedIn PERSONAL&CONFIDENTIAL The Information transmitted herein may contain privileged and/or confidential material.Any disclosure,copying, distribution or other use of,or taking of any action in reliance upon,Information contained herein or attached hereto by persons or entities other than the intended recipient(s) Is prohibited. Any misdirection or other error in the transmission of this information is not and shall not be considered a waiver of any applicable privileges. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately notify the sender and destroy the original transmission and its attachments without saving, distributing or copying in any manner. 4f Please consider the environment before printing this email message. 2 From: Ellen Harmon <ellentharmon@gmail.com> Sent:Thursday, September 29, 2022 3:44 PM To: Drew Victoria Gamils<DGamils@kblaw.com>; Michal Nowak<mnowak@rvebrook.org>; Mike Izzo <mizzo@ryebrook.org> Cc: ETH <ellentharmon@gmail.com>; Mark<harmon.mark53@gmail.com>; Tara Orlando <torlando@rvebrook.org>; cbradburv@rvebrook.org; dheiser@rvebrook.org; rig lawyer@hotmail.com Subject: Re: Response Requested - 18 Hillandale Rd We would appreciate a response to our message below that was sent on Sept 21. Thank you. Mark& Ellen Harmon On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 9:56 AM Mark Harmon <harmon.mark53@gmail.com>wrote: While we were hoping, as we are sure everyone on this email was hoping, to be finished, once and for all, with the lengthy saga of 18 Hillandale Rd, we are, unfortunately, not. It appears that although a second 30-day Temporary Certificate of Occupancy was granted to the Markses on August 17, 2022, perhaps on the reasonable assumption or hope, notwithstanding the history of repeated non-compliance, that the Markses would finally comply with the Planning Board resolution approving their amended Site Plan, none of the work has been undertaken, let alone completed. That second TCO expired on September 17, and yet the Markses continued to use their pool after that date. To briefly recap the history of this site: 3 (i) the Markses obtained their original Building Permit in April 2021 and their original Wetlands Permit in February 2021, both valid for one year with extensions available upon application; their Steep Slopes Permit was approved in March 2021; (ii) the Planning Board approved their original Site Plan in February 2021; (iii) the Markses built their pool, installed their pool equipment, erected a fence around the pool, planted some shrubbery, and installed a rain garden during the balance of 2021 -- without any notice to the Building Department nor to us, their adjacent neighbors at 16 Hillandale Rd, nor any application to the Planning Board to amend their original Site Plan, the placement of the pool equipment and the installation of the fence were in direct and substantial contravention of the approved Site Plan and were visible and/or audible to us, and were in violation of certain provisions of the Village Code - the shrubs that were planted were not in compliance with their own original site plan (nor adequate for screening given the revised placement of the pool equipment), and various aspects of the rain garden were problematic; nonetheless, they began to use their pool at the end of the summer of 2021, without at that time having obtained a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy; (iv) after raising these issues to the Building Department and the Planning Board, at five public meetings of the Planning Board held between March 2022 and July 2022, and following extensive 4 discussions and site visits, as well as numerous documentary submissions, the Planning Board approved the Amended Site Plan pursuant to resolutions on July 28, 2022 that required specific work to be done, including without limitation: Replacement of the pool pump with a quieter model to mitigate sound disturbance; Installation of a cover around the pool equipment to mitigate sound and visual disturbances; Regular removal of fill that accumulates against our fence between the properties; Installation of numerous screening plantings between the two property lines, around the pool equipment, and around the pool itself to mitigate visual concerns; Installation of an impermeable barrier at the base of their property to prevent/diminish water flow onto 16 Hillandale Rd from their rain garden; and Adjustments to the rain garden construction to direct water into the brook and away from our property None of the above work has been done -- although the Markses continue to use their pool even in the absence of a current TCO. It would seem that even if a third TCO were to be issued, given the end of the swimming season around September 17, there may be little to no 5 motivation for the Markses to spend the money to comply with the required work this year. So our question for the Building Inspector and the Village Attorney at this point is: what recourse is there to compel the Markses to comply? Is Village Code Section 250-12 (A), that permits the Village to impose monetary fines on non-complying homeowners (and does not anywhere require the Village to seek court authorization to impose these fines), a tool for enforcement that may be used by the Building Department in this situation? While this issue is, of course, important to us as the adjacent homeowners, it raises the much broader concern about how the Village ensures that its residents will follow approved plans and resolutions, and comply with our Code, and how the Village can enforce compliance when residents ignore these requirements with seeming impunity. Thanks very much for your consideration. Mark & Ellen Harmon Mark A. Harmon (914) 589 - 9610 Ellen T. Harmon ellentharmon@gmail.com 6 Mike Izzo From: Mike Izzo Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2022 9:27 AM To: Daniel Marks Cc: Tara Gerardi; Dan Sherman; Laura Petersen; Michal Nowak Subject: RE: Building permit extension request. BP#21-074 Dear Mr. & Ms. Marks, Thank you for the email and for the modest permit extension request. Please note that Village Code allows for up to two, six-month extensions to open permits for good cause as shown by the applicant, and your application certainly qualifies as such. And although I appreciate your modest request, three months may prove inadequate given the nature of your application. Therefore, I am pleased to inform you that a six (6) month extension to your open permit #BP21-074 has been approved, and that the new permit expiration date is, October 12, 2022. Please arrange for all work to be completed and successfully inspected, and for all paperwork & fees to be remitted to the Village such to facilitate the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy closing out the permit on or before that date. Please remember that in accordance with Village Code §250-10.A., it is a violation to use or occupy or to allow the use or occupancy of any building, premises or part thereof including swimming pools without a Certificate of Occupancy duly issued by the Building Inspector. Thank you. lfflc4ael(T /no Building& Fire Inspector Village of Rye Brook, NY (914) 939-0668 From: Daniel Marks<dan.marksl3@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, March 15, 2022 7:59 PM To: Mike Izzo<Mlzzo@ryebrook.org> Cc:Tara Gerardi<tgerardi@ryebrook.org>; Dan Sherman<dan.danshermanlandscape@gmail.com> Subject: Building permit extension Hi Mr. Izzo- We are writing to request a 3-month extension to our building permit on 18 Hillandale Road. Our current permit expires on April 13th. We had hoped that we would be able to obtain a certificate of occupancy reflecting the amendments that we've requested with the planning board, but as yet, have not received approval for the amendments. We are hopeful to receive approval at the April meeting(and if necessary,ARB approval for amendments at their May meeting). We anticipate that all work related to these amendments should be completed relatively quickly thereafter. Thanks very much for your consideration, Yael and Daniel Marks Mike Izzo From: Mark Harmon <harmon.mark53@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2022 1:06 PM To: Daniel Marks; Ellen Harmon; Rays; dan.danshermanlandscape@gmail.com; Mike Izzo Subject: Re: Daniel Marks contact info Dan: Ellen and I have now had an opportunity to meet with our landscaper, Ray Barnes, and to compare your plantings with the landscaping plan approved by the Planning Board. A few comments before I address the immediate issues. First, Ellen and I did not oppose your application to install a swimming pool when you presented your plans to the Planning Board. As you noted in an earlier conversation, our home is the property most immediately impacted by your construction, and yet we tried not be an obstruction to your plans. We very carefully reviewed your landscape plan which called for 25 plantings, ranging in height from 4 feet to nine feet along our property line. At least on paper, we were satisfied that you had acted appropriately to screen our property from any intrusion from your construction. Second, Ray never told Dan Sherman that he thought your plantings were sufficient or in compliance with the approved plans. He listened to what Dan had to say and acknowledged those statements-as having been made - not as accurate. I have copied both Ray and Dan Sherman so there will be no misunderstanding going forward. The two features of your pool installation that cause us the most visual concern are the fence installed above the retaining wall around the perimeter of the pool, and the location of the pool filter and equipment. As I am sure you know, neither the fence nor the pool equipment, as installed, are consistent with the plans submitted to and approved by the Planning Board. The pool equipment was supposed to be installed on the far side of your home away from our property. And there was no notice of a fence sitting atop the retaining wall surrounding the pool either in the application or the renderings submitted to the Planning Board which,to the contrary, clearly disclose no such fence. That was the state of affairs when the public hearing was held at the Planning Board to which we made no objection. When we first spoke, after you had gone forward to plant some non-conforming plantings, you said your landscaper had been unable to find plantings that would conform. But the fact is that you have not complied with the requirements of the approved plans. Most of what you have since referred to as"additional plantings" are simply plantings that were required in the first instance. And, even now,you have not complied with the landscape plan, either in the number, size or type of plantings. We also have concerns that many of the plantings will not survive the winter. But even were all that remedied, there remains the issue that the landscape plan was submitted and approved without consideration that a fence would be installed above the pool perimeter and that the pool equipment would be located behind the pool adjacent to our property line. Had we known that this was your ultimate intent,we would not have remained quiet. In addition, it appears that, in the construction of the rain garden, your contractor has used our fence at the base of our property, intentionally or otherwise, as a retaining wall for earth and debris. Not only does this create potential damage to our fence, it is causing water to drain through the back of our property instead of into the stream. In sum, Dan,we are not satisfied that you have met your obligations and believe that ameliorating these issues can only be accomplished by relocating the pool equipment, remedying the rain garden issue, and solving the screening issues that result in part from the installation of a fence above the retaining wall surrounding the pool and the failure to comply with the plans as approved. Mark A. Harmon 1 (914) 589-9610 On Sat,Jan 8, 2022 at 11:46 AM Daniel Marks<dan.marks13@gmail.com>wrote: Hi Mark- Happy new year and I hope all is well. Dan (S) and Ray finally connected on Thursday this week. Ray seemed to think the coverage was very thorough and would be extremely full when the younger plants grew in next spring/summer (possibly to the point where some of the additional planting would need to be removed). Please let me know when you've had a chance to discuss with him so we can discuss next steps viz. the building dept. Thanks, Dan On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 11:54 AM Daniel Marks<dan.marks13@gmail.com>wrote: Ah ok thanks. On Dec 22, 2021, at 8:11 AM, Mark Harmon<harmon.mark53@gmail.com>wrote: Dan Sherman emailed me last week to say he knew my landscaper and would reach out to him over the weekend. I'll follow up. Mark A. Harmon (914) 589-9610 On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 11:03 AM Daniel Marks<dan.marks13@gmail.com>wrote: Just following up, we still haven't heard from your landscaper. On Dec 17, 2021, at 4:57 PM, Mark Harmon<harmon.mark53@gmail.com>wrote: Dan: I have put the two of them in touch. As an aside, I don't know if you have been watering your new plantings, but some of them look like they could really use some attention. Mark A. Harmon (914) 589-9610 On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 12:52 PM Daniel Marks<dan.marks13@gmail.com>wrote: Hi Mark- Just wanted to be sure you had received my email (and that I didnt mishear the email address on the voicemail). I spoke to the landscape architect today, he's generally more responsive by phone (mobile 914-755-0855, office 914-824-0999) if your landscaper wanted to try him over that route. Dan On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 8:11 PM Daniel Marks<dan.marks13@gmail.com>wrote: 2 Hi Mark- Sorry I missed your call earlier today, bit of a crazy day. Here is my email so you have it. My landscape architect is dan.danshermanlandscape@gmail.com, I will give him the heads up that your landscaper will be reaching out. Thanks vm, Dan 3 Mike Izzo From: Ellen Harmon <ellentharmon@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 9, 2021 9:02 AM To: Mike Izzo Cc: Michal Nowak; Steven Fews Subject: Re: Swimming Pool Construction at 18 Hillandale Road - Two Questions Thank you for your prompt response. The use of the pool was on a daily basis at the end of the summer, often with large groups of adults and numerous children. The existence of an open rain garden with substantial standing water in it and no fence around it-an attractive nuisance, as well as a potential danger to children -is, I gather, an issue with no Code solution. Your attention to these matters is appreciated. Ellen Harmon On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 8:51 AM Mike Izzo<Mlzzo@ryebrook.org>wrote: Dear Ms. Harmon, Thank you for the email. Please note that permit #BP21-074 issued on 4.13.21 for the installation of an in-ground swimming pool, swimming pool equipment, swimming pool fence, retaining walls, deck renovation, pergola, outdoor kitchen, and assorted vegetative features at the subject property is still open and active, and no C/O has been issued or requested by the property owner. Please note that all matters pertaining to project compliance with the approved plans, Village Code, the Residential Code of NY State, as well as with any conditions set by the Village Planning Board or approvals granted by the Village Architectural Review Board will be vetted prior to the issuance of such C/O, including the two questions raised in your email. Regarding your allegation that the swimming pool is/was being used, please note that such use without a C/O in place is a violation of Village Code, and that considering the obvious life-safety issues of allowing the use of an unapproved swimming pool and unapproved pool life-safety features we intend to initiate a thorough investigation into this matter. Thank you. Alc4iae /zzo Building & Fire Inspector Village of Rye Brook, NY (914) 939-0668 From: Ellen Harmon <ellentharmon@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, November 9, 2021 7:07 AM To: Mike Izzo<Mlzzo@ryebrook.org>; mnowack@ryebrook.org Subject: Swimming Pool Construction at 18 Hillandale Road -Two Questions Dear Messrs Izzo and Nowack -- I'm a homeowner of the property at 16 Hillandale Road, adjacent to the property at 18 Hillandale Road. As you know, the homeowners at 18 Hillandale Road have constructed a swimming pool during the period of April to October 2021, which pool has been in use since Sept / Oct. have two questions about compliance (or the lack thereof) with the Village Code in this construction project. The first question is that it appears that Code Section 224-7 (C) below requires pool equipment to be underground or buffered to minimize noise -- the pool equipment at issue is above ground and entirely open, with no screening or apparent buffering of any kind, in full view of and audible by those on our property. The second question is that Code Section 224-10 appears to require either a solid fence or 4 ft high plantings between pool rim and lot lines - - neither has been installed by them and their pool is in full view from our property. The Code provision does not suggest that small plantings 2 that may someday grow to 4 ft are compliant, but perhaps I am missing some other provision that would permit that interpretation. Since the pool has been in use, I assumed that the C of 0 had been closed out and that these Code provisions should have been fully complied with. I'd appreciate your views on these two matters and how to deal with them. Thanks very much. Ellen Harmon *********************************************************** ********************************************** Code - Village of Rye Brook 224-7Size and location. A. No swimming pool shall have a surface area of water which exceeds 10% of the total area of the property. B. No swimming pool shall be constructed or erected nearer than 15 feet from the water's edge to any property line. C. Filters, heaters and pumps shall be located underground or buffered to minimize noise and located no less than 10 feet from a property line. 3 D. No pool or associated structures or equipment shall be located in any front yard as defined in the Chapter 250, Zoning. E. On a corner lot, a pool erected on the side yard facing a street shall require the front yard setback on both the front and side yards as defined in the Chapter 250, Zoning. F. If no public sewer is accessible, no pool shall be located nearer than 40 feet to a septic tank or its field. G. In the event that a person is unable to meet the yard and setback requirements of this section, application may be made to the Zoning Board of Appeals for a variance from such requirements on the ground of practical difficulty. 224-10Screening. Where planting as a screen does not exist, dense shrubs no less than four feet high shall be planted or a solid fence installed between the pool rim and the lot lines. Ellen T. Harmon ellentharmon0nmail.com Ellen T. Harmon ellentharmon@gmail.com 4 DIGITAL GAS POOL AND SPA HEATER -- r MODERN _ WTI DESIGN AND '' CONSTRUCTION DYNAMIC SELF-DIAGNOSTIC CONTROLS FEATURING PROTEK SHIELDTM AVAILABLE AS ATMOSPHERIC, LOW NOX, AND ASME A Rheem"Company RELAXATION Soak it all in, you deserve this. The sleek and stylish Raypak Digital Gas Pool and Spa Heater is available in Atmospheric, Low NOx and ASME models. The Digital Gas Pool and Spa Heaters feature innovative technology designed to keep your pool or spa at the perfect temperature for your enjoyment. Built to withstand various weather conditions, this modern pool and spa heater is the perfect solution for environments requiring efficiency, convenience and versatility. Whether upgrading your existing system or adding a new pool or spa to your home, our heater offers you flexible installation solutions. Thanks to a brilliant low-profile design, corrosion resistant cabinet made of galvanized metal, copper or cupronickel fin tube heat exchanger, and a bevy of advanced- engineered materials you will be able to enjoy your heater year round. Outdoor protective bezel Fin tube heat o � exchanger Durable indoor/ outdoor jacket i _ I i Polymer header O with ProTek Shield O Digital control i. Bronze header with ProTek Shield Blower (ASME models only) (207A-407A models only) STARTS H R ProTek Shield >> ProTek Shield is a cutting-edge module that protects the ProTek heat exchanger and extends the life of your Raypak Digital Shield Gas Pool and Spa Heater. Rest, soak or swim knowing that your pool heater investment can be enjoyed even longer thanks to this innovative, patent-pending technology. — • Excellent for use in chlorinated and salt water pools • Engineered to take the brunt of the corrosion that naturally occurs over time (erosion of the ProTek Shield means it's working!) • Utilizes breakthrough patent pending technology -� • Compact design low • Easy to replace, saving you time and money • Included on all models' ProTek Shield on ASME heater shown above. More Amazing Features Heat Exchanger :��_ Low NOx Certified Our Digital Gas Pool and Spa Heater Available on our Digital Gas Pool and Spa IV includes various application options based Heater Low NOx(207A-407A) models, on fin tube materials including: copper the air fuel mixture is maintained by a gas and cupronickel, both available as ASME. valve/blower system that allows the heater Bronze ASME headers provide the to always burn clean and safe. strength needed to meet commercial code Bonus: Meets additional safety standards requirements. and regulations required for TexaSZ, California and Utah. It Flexible Installation Digital Controls Whether upgrading your existing system or Equipped with an intelligent control system vie adding a new pool or spa to your home,the that can easily be tied into an existing remote Raypak Digital Gas Pool and Spa Heater system,our heater also features a offers you flexible installation solutions. microprocessor-controlled thermostat for setting the perfect temperature for your pool Bonus:The self-adjusting burner or spa. compensates for gas pressure fluctuations, ensuring that the heater will always burn clean and safe. t ProTek Shield field installation kits available for existing ASME heaters. 2 Flow switch option available for ASME Low NOx heaters,Texas Boiler Code compliant. Leam more at raypak.com Digital Gas Pool and Spa Heater Indoor Models 206A - 407A Dm thood F G H Outdoor Stackless Top Wate Intlet 2"Slip Water Outlet 00 0 2"Slip Polymer • Header w/ProTek Shield D � K Gas Connection C� 3/4 NPT E � A 2e• t B (711 mm) MBTUH(kWh) Dimensions in.(mm) Est.Ship Weight lbs.(kg) w/ w/ Model Cupro- A B B C C D L Poymer Bronze Indoor :op per w/ w/ w/ w/ Headers Headers nickel Cabinet Cabinet E F G H J K Flue Draft- Input Input Width Polymer Bronze Polymer Bronze Height and and hood Headers Headers Headers Headers g e Stackless Stackless Top Top 206A 200 180 20 24-1/4 29-7/8 26-5/8 25-15/16 38 13-1/4 61-5/8 1 10 11-3/4 32-11/16 40 6 187 206 14 (59) (53) (508) 1 (616) (758) (676) (660) (965) (337) (1565) (254) (298) (830) (1016) (152) (85) (94) (6.4) U `m 266A 266 240 23 27-1/4 32-7/8 26-5/8 25-15/16 38 13-1/4 62 11-1/2 11 32-11/16 40 7 210 229 16 (78) (70) (584) (692) (835) (676) (660) (965) (337) (1575) (292) (279) (830) (1016) (178) (95) (104) (7.3) E 336A 333 300 26 30-1/4 35-7/8 26-5/8 25-15/16 38 13-1/4 63 13 10-5/8 32-11/16 40 8 230 249 19 R (98) (88) (660) (768) (911) (676) (660) (965) (337) (1600) (330) (270) (830) (1016) (203) (104) (113) (8.6) 406A 399 360 29 33-1/4 38-7/8 26-5/8 25-15/16 38 13-1/4 64-9/16 14-1/2 12-1/8 32-11/16 40 9 249 268 21 (117) (106) 1 (737) 1 (845) (987) (676) (660) (965) (337) 1(1640) (368) (308) (830) (1016) (229) (113) (122) (9.5) 207A 200 N/A 20 24-1/4 29-7/8 20-1/2 19-13/16 31-13/16 7-3/4 55-5/8 10 11-3/4 26-1/2 34 6 174 193 14 (59) (508) (616) (758) (521) (503) (792) (197) (1413) (254) (298) (673) (867) (152) (79) (88) (6.4) X 267A 266 N/A 23 27-1/4 32-7/8 20-112 19-13/16 31-13/16 7-3/4 56 11-1/2 11 26-1/2 34 7 197 216 16 Z (78) (584) (692) (835) (521) (503) (792) (197) (1422) (292) (279) (673) (867) (178) (89) (98) (7.3) 0 337A 333 N/A 26 30-1/4 35-7/8 20-1/2 19-13/16 31-13/16 7-3/4 57 13 10-5/8 26-1/2 34 8 219 238 19 (98) (660) (768) (911) (521) (503) (792) (197) (1448) (330) (270) (673) (867) (203) (99) (108) (8.6) 399 29 133-1/4 38-7/8 20-1/2 19-13/16 31-13/16 7-3/4 58-1/2 14-1/2 12-1/2 26-1/2 34 9 237 256 21 407A (117) N/4 (737) (845) (987) (521) (503) (792) (197) (1486) (368) (318) (673) (867) (229) (108) (116) (9.5) Amp Drawl t Single phase,60 Hz. Models 120VAC 240VAC 206A-406A 4 2 207A-407A 6 3 pE51Gp cfi . www, raypak,com �/PF 2151 Eastman Avenue 11 Oxnard, CA 93030 805-278-5300 LW ctim 1EUa H Litho in U.S.A.02020 Raypak, Inc. 6000.75 Effective 11-01-20 Replaces NEW WDDJ.E164833 -Swimming Pool and Spa Cover Operators,Electric http://database.ul.com/cgi-bin/XYV/template/LISEXT/1FRAME/showpa... U` ONLINE CERTIFICATIONS DIRECTORY WDD].E164833 Swimming Pool and Spa Cover Operators, Electric Page Bottom Swimming Pool and Spa Cover Operators, Electric See General Information for Swimming Pool and Spa Cover Operators Electrk LATHAM POOL PRODUCTS INC E164833 1795 W 200 N Lindon,UT 84042-1661 USA Pool cover operators,Models CS 1800,CS 1800 CL,CS 1800 LO,CS 1800 SS,CS 1800 SW. Pool cover operator accessory,pool cover drain pump,Model AD-1100. Pool cover operator and safety cover, Model Infinity 4000.Classified in Accordance with ASTM F 1346-91 (Reapproved 2010). Last Updated on 2015-01-09 Ouestions? Print this page Terms of Use Page Too © 2016 UL LLC The appearance of a company's name or product in this database does not in itself assure that products so identified have been manufactured under UUs Follow-Up Service.Only those products bearing the UL Mark should be considered to be Certified and covered under UL's Follow-Up Service.Always look for the Mark on the product. UL permits the reproduction of the material contained in the Online Certification Directory subject to the following conditions: 1.The Guide Information,Assemblies,Constructions,Designs,Systems,and/or Certifications(files) must be presented in their entirety and in a non-misleading manner,without any manipulation of the data (or drawings). 2.The statement"Reprinted from the Online Certifications Directory with permission from UL" must appear adjacent to the extracted material.In addition,the reprinted material must include a copyright notice in the following format: "©2016 UL LLC". 1 of 1 10/18/2016 8:42 AM Serene + NOISE REDUCTION POOL PUMP EQUIPMENT COVER "Pnmiw Innovations Inc." MODELL080555 Dimensions : 30L x 12W x 14H k. i Year Warranty arranty * 75% - 90% Sound Reduction No Operating Costs * Easy Assembly. Lays Flat Storage Lid removes for pump inspection and * Versatile or Custom Fit Available maintenance * Use with your favorite pool pump Durable,lightweight,high-temperature * One Year limited warranty resistant * Various colors available to blend into Protect against: rust,dirt,rain,snow and sun your landscape Extends the life of your pump,protects against corrosion PENTAIR ✓ HAYWARD ✓ STA-RITE Intelli-Flo EcoStar IntelliPro XF SuperFlo VS MaxRo VS IntelliPro VS TriStar VS IntelliPro 2 VST Max-E-Pro XF JANDY SuperMax VS Pro Series VS FloPro US PATENT No. 7 874.400 100%Satisfaction Guaranteed.If you are unhappy with the product you may return it up to 30 days after 1000� AWN delivery for a full refund minus 10%restocking fee and A*US ° y ;,, the product must be in excellent condition. ��# (The buyer is responsible for shipping cost) 32" CHANNEL DRAIN FLAT GRATE ANTI-ENTRAPMENT SUCTION AQUASTAR • • ••. • • pool products r— i CERTIFIED Floor Flow • Wall Flow • Sump DepthOpen Area mi SPECIFICATIONS 316 GPM3.9 fps 208 GPM at 2.6 fps • in FEATURES Unblockable! All components 11 andeet exceed Improved water stop and sump design VGe AN51/APSP 16-2011 and NSF/ANSI 50-2009a national standards and ASTM G 154 UV testing 300° exposure Three ports:bottom 216"OD,2"ID S/S;inside 2" threaded FPT;two 2"threaded plugs included Strong PVC sump does not require transitional glue Designed for use with 2'hydrostatic relief `� == valve part#HVxxx(see page 103) Disposable plastic pre-gunite/plaster insert keeps debris out and retains sump shape during construction #316 stainless steel screws Manufactured from superior lid Water Stop and Textured Sump UV-resistant engineered polymers Online product support including _ downloadable CAD files,General Certificate of Pool Finish Conformity,third-party certificate,installation ter Stop instructions and more -00 Replace drain cover every five years from the date of installation 4 per case WoiG nil,I e 1_ I Pipe With sump(concrete pools) U.S.patent 20140157510 Part#32CDF xxx STANDARD COLORS 33 5/1 B 7 32CDFL101-White 4-9/32 e \t r rr r . 32CDFL102-Black 5 r r r r 4 r r 32CDFL103-Light Gray 3 rr r � ��® _r 32CDFL104-Blue 5-9/18 II II 1 2 V, ■ 32CDFL105-Dark Gray F-- 10_—_10 6111 32CDFL108-Tan 2-1/2'Spigot x 2'Socket x 2"NPT Also available as sump only p/n 1. 32"Three-Port PVC Sump 32CDPxxx 4 per case 2.2"Tapered Threaded Pipe Plug,City 2 3.Port Divider Also available cover only without 4.8 x 1/2 Pan Head Philips,316 SS,City 4 sump/frame p/n 32CDFLNFxxx 5.32"Channel Drain Plaster Shield 24 per case 6.32"Channel Drain Flush Cover 7.10 x 3/4"Flat Head Phillips,316 SS,City 16 VGB 2008 Compliant Plaster Shield And Screws To Be Removed After Gunite/Plaster Application o6i)aquastar pool p roduc ts.com ... . ..uc ts.Corn 9 IC), HAYWAREY TriStar ENERGY EFFICIENT, HIGH- PERFORMANCE PUMP SERIES • Superior performance Superior energy efficiency Superior value The TriStar pump's advanced hydraulic design optimizes the three essential pump elements to deliver superior flow,impressive energy efficiency and value.The heavy-duty pump and motor run cooler for years of dependability.Featuring a tri-lock cam and ramp strainer cover that closes with less than a quarter turn,TdStar also sports a super-sized,smooth, no-rib basket with extra leaf-holding capacity that's a snap to clean.With a variety of bases available,TriStar seamlessly retrofits to existing filtration systems. Energy Efficient MAP Total System: Pumps I Filters I Heating I Cleaners I Sanitization I Automation I Lighting I Safety I White Goods TriStar® Pumps AL Technology incorporated into TriStar creates a new benchmark in residential pool pumps and its higher flow rates can allow for stepping down in pump horsepower.Overall,TriStars feature the most energy efficient hydraulics and are the simplest pumps to install,retrofit and service. Features SINGLE SPEED TOTAL FULL RATE SERVICE DIMENSION MODELS HP HIP FACTOR VOLTS PORT SIZE "A" • Save up to 70%on your energy costs with the SP3205EE 0.99 14 1 1.98 115/208-230 2'/2W 13%" combination of an advanced hydraulic design and SP3207EE 1.39 % I 1.85 11VM-230 2•/2W I 13%' proven two-speed technology SP3210EE 1.85 1 1.85 1115/208-230 2'/214' 14%' • Higher flow rates can allow for stepping down in SP3215EE 2.40 1* 1.60 115/208 23p 2•/23�. 146• energy consumption pump horsepower for even lower cost and SP3220EE 2.70 2 1.35 208-230 12•/2W 143i- SP3230EE 3.60 3 1.20 208-230 2'/214' 1 W • Heavy-duty motor with dynamic airflow designed for � �. 3.80 3 1.20 208/230-480 2•/274• 171i• greater dependability and longer life I • 2"x 2 Y2"CPVC union connections make installation SP3250EE 5.0 5 1.00 208-230 2'/2%' 17A' and servicing fast and easy MODELS2-SPEED TOTAL FULL RATE SERVICE VOLTS PORT SIZE DIMENSION FACTOR • No-rib basket design insures easy debris removal. SP32102EE 1.85 1 1 1.85 208-230 j 2'/214' 14%' Extra-leaf-holding-capacity basket extends time SP32152EE 1 2.40 U4 7 1.60 1 208-230 1 2'/214• 1434• between cleanings SP32202EE 1 2.70 1 2 1.35 208-230 2'/2W 1436• • Tri-Lock cam and ramp strainer cover design seals 'Three Phase with less than a quarter turn 120 • Crystal clear strainer cover lets you see when the basket needs cleaning F 100 Q • Pressure testable to 50 psi maximum U so • Second base included to align TriStar with other models for easy retrofit installations 60 0 • Self-priming(suction lift up to 10'above water level) = 40 J SP•� !�} `- 0 20 SP321Inn(Low S 0 SP321 SM(I.ow SPNQ 0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0 100.0 120.0 140.0 160.0 180.0 200.0 FLOW(GPM) , 0 _ TRISTAR- 2-SPEED T`70% SAVINGS To take a closer look at Hayward Pumps,go to ON YOUR ENERGY COSTS www.haywardpool.com or call 1-888-HAYWARD. Di HAYWARKY & HS)CP- Hayward,Hayward Energy Solutions 620 Division Street I Elizabeth,NJ 07201 and TyStar are registered trademarks A of Hayward Industries,Inc. c 2011 Hayward Indushles,Inc. UMIR11 HAYWAR[Y SwimClear TM QUAD-CLUSTER CARTRIDGE FILTERS High performance. Operational convenience. Hayward SwimClear reaches new horizons in cartridge filter technology. A cluster of four reusable polyester cartridge elements provides a choice of 225, 325, 425 and now 525 ft,` of heavy-duty, dirt-holding capacity and extra-long filter cycles, SwimClear filter tanks are made from a reinforced co-polymer material for the ultimate in strength, durability and long life — even for the toughest applications and environmental conditions, Discover the crystal clear results and reliable performance of SwimClear by Hayward — g�� the first choice of pool professionals. �11 �W GoodsTotal System: Pumps I Filters I Heating I Cleaners I Sanitization I Automation I Lighting I Safety I White Manual Air Relief Combination Pressure and Cleaning- is a high capacity,rapid release Cycle-Indicator Gauge manual air relief valve that bleeds air gives visual indication when cartridge with a quick quarter turn of the lever, filter elements need cleaning. Top Manifold — Quad-Cluster Cartridge Elements provides excellent filtration and provide 225,325,425 or 525 ft.'of filter area hydraulic performance. !/ and extra dirt-holding capacity for long filter cycles.Precision-engineered core provides extra Heavy-Duty,Tamper-Proof,One-Piece Clamp strength and superior flow. securely fastens tank top and bottom together Self-Aligned Tank Top and Bottom and allows quick access to all intemal make access to servicing Quad- components without disturbing piping or Cluster cartridge elements quick connections. � and easy. High-Strength Filter Tank is made from durable,glass reinforced co-polymer to meet the demands of the — CPVC Union Coupling Connection toughest applications and environmental provides plumbing options of 2"or conditions,including in-floor cleaning systems. _ 231"piping with 2" full flow internal piping for maximum performance. Uniform Low-Profile Tank Base Design makes removal of cartridge — elements fast and simple. \ Noryl'Bulkhead Fittings Full-Size 1 W'Integral Drain for extra strength and heat resistance. provides fast clean-out and flushing. 1 i SPECIFICATIONSA. QUAD-CLUSTER CARTRIDGE FILTER TYPE Quad-Cluster cartridge elements: 225,325,425 and 525 ft?total(20.9,30.2,39.5 and 48.0 m2) FILTER TANK Injection-molded glass reinforced co-polymer FILTER ELEMENTS Reinforced Polyester PERFORMANCE RANGE Yz to 3 HP(30 to 150 GPM) .37 to 2.24 kW(114 to 568 LPM) C2030—23"W x 32 Y2"H(58 cm x 81 cm) DIMENSIONS C3030—23"W x 34 Y2"H(58 cm x 87 cm) C4030—23"W x 40 Y2"H(58 cm x 102 cm) lit C5030—23"W x 46 Y2"H(58 cm x 117 cm) CPVC Union Connections PERFORMANCEDATA DESIGNEFFECTIVE TURNOVER 30 MODEL 40 FILTRATION AREAFLOWR' 1KILOLITERS NUMBER 1 hrs. 8 hirs. 10 C2030 225 20.9 84' 318 1 40,320 50,400 153 191 C3030 325 30.2 122' 462 1 58,560 73,200 222 277 C4030 425 39.5 150" 568 72,000 90,000 273 341 L C5030 i 525 48.8 j 150" I 568 72,000 90,000 1 273 341 Pressure and Cleaning Gauge 'Based on NSF recommended rate for commercial use at.375 GPM/ft.' "Determined by pump size and piping system hydraulics;2'piping Is recommended for flow rates equal to or greater t1w 90 GPM(341 IPM).Hayward doesn't recommend flow rates above 150 GPM. NSF To take a closer look at Hayward Filters,go to I�Jr www.hayward-pool.com orcalll-888-HAYWARD QHAYWARU 620 Division Street I Elizabeth,NJ 07201 V Hayward aM Maynard Energy solutions are registernd trademarks and A SwImClear and Noryl are tredemarM of Heyward Industries.Inc. C2010 Hayward Industries,Inc. LrTSwC 10 Zq ] iw ift co O ti Y i C i CO Rp 9 r sue• POW r� r s ti. i )jr � f / W Lo p cn m v CU -o ILIZ t CO rry l A4JAI s _ V „ CL O-\ LC) U Cl\ I.C) } Z O � S � � � 3 oW - Q a o 0 0 Q � m S c1 > J r � � kAr N _O r � I i,�'.��, J }• d { Y}� �"r_��r'!{�✓�l+sl c� 00 m y ' KLJ+• a.. v r� ^�"�T ''�'�a•a^c �� �4} /�`��.�-i".�' .ate '��_ fr � cry -ta�3°f '�f" a,. j.• �iyG'�c�-'-`eaffiSs` •r? :% mil.-f �;l "vsr's „'�'�a W `t S'r�.' .1+•�- t` _ W V t • � � �� 1. _�� �/�� 1 lP ! 1 �l r, ON U o 0 V) m s a > v � a v z a � o o Y = m ra = v GO T °`+L kv l y� v ya CL LC) U LC) x . < 3 a o a Q � m s > a J Building Permit Check List&Zoning A"sis Address: o �l �.L-A•+-� A lam_ —Z:- SBL. Zone: - Z S Use: Z I o Const.Type: __—'tZ- er. Submittal Date: I \ Z VZ-C, Revisions Submittal Dates: 12 2 C I Applicant kak Nature of Work IGQ0jN-%!L-_. w lA-kN tJ l� kk. Lt-S —T4w T9 '1.1P L,3 __?�,_(L4J c.� ��OC>C' Reviews:ZBA. NOV 2 4 2020 P& BOT: Other. OK ( ( ) FEES:Filing. IX' BP: 3 3 ti 2- "_ C/O: Legalization: Dated / Notarized: -. SBL: --'� Truss I.D. Cross Connectiort: H.O.A.: ( (� Scenic Roads: Steep Slopes Wetlands: Storm Water Review: ✓ Street Opening. ( ) ( ) ENVIRO:Long. Short: Fees: N/A: ( ) ( ) SITE PLAN:Topo: Site Protection: S/W Mgmt.: Tree Plan: Other. (V� ( ) SURVEY:Dated Current: Archival:- Sealed Unacceptable: Date Stamped Sealed Copies: -- Electronic: `-/ Other. ( ) ( License: ✓ Workers Comp: ✓ Liability. Comp.Waiver. Other. (•� ( ) CODE 753#: O!Y 1-- C01' 9 74-00 Dated—&-a N/A: HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRICAL:Plans: Permit: N/A: Other. ( ) ( ) LOW-VOLTAGE ELECTRICAL:Plans: Permit: N/A: Other. ( ) ( ) FIRE ALARM/SMOKE DETECTORS:Plans: Permit: H.W.I.C.:_Battery:_Other. (✓f ( ) PLUMBING:Plans: Permit: Nan Gas: LP Gas: N/A/: Other. ( ) ( ) FIRE SUPPRESSION:Plans: Permit: N/A: Other. ( ) ( ) H.V.A.C.: Plans: Permit: N/A Other. ( ) ( ) FUEL TANK:Plans: Permit: Fuel Type: Other. O O 2020 NY State ECCC: N/A: Other. Final Survey Final Topo: RA/PE Sign-off Letter. As-Built Plans: Other. ( ) ( ) BP DENIAL LETTER: C/O DENIAL LETTER: Other. O O Other. L (�ARB mtg.date: approval:- notes: ( )ZBA mtg.date: approval: notes: (�B mtg.date: approv notes: REQUIRED ExI.sTN PROPOSED NOTES APPROVED Ate: ZS k Ai Li , $ 20211 Cirde Fro Front: Front: Sides: R.Mr. Main COP. Accs.Co v ` o I •Lj s F S Sd.H Sb: Tot.img: 1ZEZ�s� �zt� �'i Z?Oq 7_ -7 FLImp: PP Height/Stories: notes: d S�lc�+ w S JF0--1A t-1 1\ _ZLf — k X-4 D BUILDING DEPARTMENT VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK NOV 12 2020 938 KING STREET RYE BROOK, NY 10573 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK (914)939-0668 FAx(914)939-5801 BUILDING DEPARTMENT www.ryebrook.org ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD CHECK LIST FOR APPLICANTS This form must be completed and signed by the applicant of record and a copy shall be submitted to the Building Department prior to attending the ARB meeting. Applicants failing to submit a copy of this check list will be removed from the ARB agen/d�a. Job Address: 1Q� LE AA�L1,4j_E> QD Date of Submission: a wD Parcel lD#: I_'55.Lt—I --7j,q zone:a`,7) Proposed Improvement(Describe in detail): APPLICANT CHECK LIST: M UST BE COMPLETED Bh' THE APPLICANT -PQ Iy - 6 Y-1 'im AT E The following items must be submitted to the Building T7cnr�t�t`,Ca t_A VAL1 S Department by the applicant-no exceptions. v - S 1. ( mpleted Application 2. ( Two(2)sets of sealed plans. (one full size(maximum Property Owner: jE't.. 1MA(Z1C� / allowable plan size=36"x 42-} and one l l"xl7") 3. ( )T o(2)copies of the property survey. Address: 115 +l\LLf��►��klJ� LLCM 4. ( o(2)copies of the proposed site plan. Phone# (01 5. ( One electronic/disc copy of the complete a plieation materials. Applicant appearing before the Board: 6. ( Filing Fee. �� S l�AA►J 7. ( )Any supporting documentation. Address: 4M y y� y—�— � '�`l 8. ( )HOA approval letter. (�fapplieable) 9. ( )Photographs. Phone# q I y -131y-CQqq 10.( )Samples of finishes/color chart. (a sample board or model may be presented the night of the meeting) Architect/Engineer: tj�ke- L"EO 1C1i.I Phone# j"1— (pa4-oggq By signature below, the owner/applicant acknowledges that he/she has read the complete Building Permit Instructions&Procedures,and that their application is complete in all respects.The Board of Review reserves the right to refuse to hear any application not meeting the requirements contained herein. Sworn to before me this { Sworn to before me this 11 day of U K, 20 Q of ;I �Sig-t-'e-f Property owner l Signa f ApF icant Print Name of Property Owner Print Name of Applicant Notary Public Notary Public IIi 3/21/19 w j VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK BUILDING DEPARTMENT 938 KING STREET, RYE BROOK, NY 10573 (T) 939-0668 (F) 939-5801 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD IN PERSON MEETING AUGUST 17, 2022 @ 7:30PM NAME&LOCATION TYPE OF APPLICATION MOTION SECOND APPROVED_ REJECTED APPL.#_ 4 Birch Lane Roof Top Solar Array Consent 5740 (Hartman) System Agenda 52 Greenway Lane New Panel(s)of Arbors Consent 5741 (Vladsky) Standard Design Fencing Agenda 9 Phyliss Place Replace Old 6ft High Consent 5742 Stockade Fence with New Agenda Stockade Fence 4 Loch Lane Replace Sliding Door& Consent 5743 (O'Neill) Windows on House. Widen Agenda One Window 15 Paddock Rd Seasonal Above Ground Consent 5744 (Santorelli) 15' Round Swimming Pool Agenda 18 Hillandale Road Amendment to Prior Sj b 6F �e(KSZ �le- G5 5745 "J� C� (Marks) Approval (Pool Barriers) (�C C C m L�`' "� `"Y' M � Fence Changes m � �,�i Sg( I Castle view Ct 1 Story 2 Car Detached 5746 Garage 14 Whippoorwill Rd In-Ground Swimming Pool 5747 (Martel) CS w/Coping&4' 0" high Fence Barrier 13 Old Orchard Rd One Story Rear Addition 5748 1 Dorchester Drive 1st Story &2nd Story 5749 (Duir) Additions, New Windows & Rear Patio 102 S. Ridge Street New Sign and Awning 5748 "Customer's Bank" 124 Country Ridge Legalize New Outdoor 5750 Drive(Brookman) Kitchen & Patio ML f NM MR f SE JM SF AC MI KC VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK BUILDING DEPARTMENT 938 KING STREET, RYE BROOK,NY 10573 (T) 939-0668 (F) 939-5801 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD IN PERSON MEETING AUGUST 17, 2022 @ 7:30PM — — - - — {PAGE TWO ( 02) 18 Lincoln Ave New Detached Barn 5750 (Magar) Style Utility Building i 18 Lincoln Ave New Solar Array on 5751 Road(Magar) Detached Utility Building. 11 Loch Lane Enclose 2nd Fl Front Porch 5752 (Karasik) i ML NM MR SE JM SF AC MI KC VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK BUILDING DEPARTMENT 938 KING STREET, RYE BROOK,NY 10573 (T) 939-0668 (F) 939-5801 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD Wednesday, March 17, 2021 Due to public health and safety concerns from COVID-19, the Architectural Review Board meeting on March 17, 2021 will be closed to members of the public. The public can still watch the live meeting online through Zoom through the app or through the following https://uso2web.zoom.us/u/88906948425 If any interested members of the public would like to provide comments during the meeting, comments can be emailed to stevefews@ryebrook.org or called in during the meeting at +1 (929) 205-6099, meeting ID: 889 0694 8425 NAME&LOCATION TYPE OF APPLICATION MOTION SECOND APPROVED REJECTED APPL.# 11 Highview Ave Roof Top Solar Array Consent 5139 (Baybay) Agenda 43 Bonwit Road New 4' Ft High Fence Consent 5150 ~, (Schutzer) Aluminum Black Agenda 24 Sleepy Hollow 2nd Appearance to Show 5135 Road(Iacobelli) Revisions/Rear Addition, Deck, Patio&Front Covered Porch 23 Rocking Horse Rear Deck Expansion.New 5151 Trail (Suesserman) Deck Roof,New rear Masonry Patio & Landing 18 Hillandale Road In-Ground Swimming Pool, 5152 (Marks) Retaining Walls, Deck Y'_L 0�-n Renovation& Pergola 3 Hills Point Lane New Windows, Doors, 5153 (Cohen) Siding, Roofing. Walkway & Interior Alterations 10 Meadowlark In-Ground Swimming Pool 5154 Road(Promisel) W/Pool Patio. Pool Fence, Boulder Wall & Steps 9 Lee Lane(Tracy) Enclose Existing Screen 5156 Porch ML NM MR SE JM SF AC MI KC o , I E � :4t1. I 46 Hill, lip _� •q• � - .,, ilk _ ,atl TV t t , 1 4 r ,< �� .�/.� i L IAA 4•�1 ��� A i� ? •(.,.`,�" �F. � ..� �. � i{fit = :r J } t • . 1. j� 1 1� �,\-Mw it i4 . Ar op _.Z-- �t Az 40, I« ampI as lett�_ — — u IF- _�I'1 ii �i ■1 111 • l , L 1 t 1' 1 6� / e IF --- ►_ Ao i I .,.� i ,' .,■� 0 ��■ I ' � ��■s ` 0 two i e J . lit 1 y 1 �. IR Of `• 3" �f • 1 (t r4 t , , litmus . _t000000, . . y I l A-0 �► • 4 AAt• -- .il1111 c r 1 Ali, Composite Decking Natural Cleft Bluestone Paving Fencing ' a r �� ► r � 1 Orr o I - p E Block Retaining Wall Composite Deck Railing MAR -3 2021 � VILLAGE OF RYA BROOK BUILDING iJtEPFiRTr.1r&'_-NT Marks Residence Daniel Sherman 18 Hillandale Rd Landscape Architect Rye Brook, NY Material Samples 4 Broadway Ste 9 March 1, 2021 Valhalla, NY 10595 ti a _ Y W n Z ; U J 0 Percolation Test No.1 o S Depth to Water From Water level Soil Rate u E S Start Time End Time Min. Ground Surface Oro Min.ln. - Elapsed Start(in.) Stop(in.) p drop) , slrE � �_ W W W O W 1 (� lq l>1 mWjlN� m 2:15 2:27 12 8 9 1 12.00 1 K Ce Q K 2:27 2:40 13 9 10 1 13.00 ' LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE 2:42 2:56 1 14 1 8 9 1 1 14.00 A=10,5W SF* Gal LL 14'MAPL 1 LOCATION MAP S$ N.T S ILI ui 1 1 tY IL w ros, to tC 1 R?sc ari General Notes RIP-RAP 3•r!A. 100 YEAR FLOODPLAN 1.Contractor to verify as conditions and dimensxxis poor to the start of worts, 4wx4'LXB"D IV MAPLE 1 any discrepancies are to be reported to the design engineer knmediately. OVERFLOW— �. 2.The contractor shall rrotify DigSafelyNY at 811,no less than two days ELV 16195 / �24'UAPLE / prior to commencing excavating activities_ 4"PVC OVERFLOW /�\ ��- '� 11 LF 3"PVC SET ELEVATION AT TOP �o POND INV=158.0 3.All work shalt conform to the Official rules and regutatiorls of the State of New York ' F BuildingConstruction F INFILTRATION OF CULTEC .MAPLE 151/ _ ` tfe.Safety and all other aDPfi(�i11e MtlrtlCtpat.State and TRENCH INV=157 0 Federal regulations. TRENCH � BO ND�y�y (SEE DETAIL) - � j' 1B•M LE ��� l� r� 1 INSTALL SILT (TYP)FENCE 4.Underground Uti1(tiEt3 are shown s'd1erTlaticaRy and SU Utilities may not be ShOWr►hereon contractor to verity all ufirdies have been field marked by the appronate agency and ST 1 rely on those representations over locations irldcated hereon. 5.Grading the property shall be performed to provide positive drainage away from the proposed foundation. 16'9APLE H1L(gNp INSBARRIER(TYP)E�' / � CAT 2.5' ' 1 Erosion Control 16a .� - ISO 1 _ 16 1.Erosion Control measures shall be installed as the first phase of work,and be r J ,•TREE PROPOSED ST c tnl 9r�ERVIOl1S AREA TO BE MfnGATM maintained througtlout ttte duration of ttMe project �164 2.Maintenam and installation shaft be in accordance with NYSDEC-Standards and y a. _J - T WALL' y TW 170.0 T'1�SFt Specifications for Erosion and Sediment Control'. SW 166.0 3.The Village can require additional measures be implemented at their discretion W h 1g r. :� - - -- -- -- 2°'0 4.The plans indicate locations of erosion control measures however the contractor Z 6. �- --166- -� I 1 must us best management practices as necessary to assure proper controls I; 24•LIAPL (330 HU'S(9)HO'S ' _- PROPOSED POOL B 5.The final subgrade shall reaeve no less than r of Noel and be sseded and mulched W S� 1 / IS EL IKO OPATIO COPING DRAIN(TYP) \ t E..I POOL - W �r- p' 16Q" EL 170 0 T 50116 C�R LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE S7` QI�❑ � W � 24'MAPLE A--10.500 SFt 1 1 000\1 ' ❑ ❑❑ PROPOSED ❑❑i N ❑❑ WOOD STEPS❑❑❑ ❑❑ PROPOSED 1 EXISTING ROOF LEADERS []0P000 DECK[10 PROPOSE ��❑ ❑❑ STONE STEPS cc TO BE PIPED TO THE 1 G \72 DRIy� CULTEC UNITS PROPOSED WOW DECST N DPROPOSED L •�0� ' 1AY,hTt ON aR- f `- -_ PR PATIO DSO E -- 5 l TrRAl1 J STONES 5` 1 ❑O PATIO BELOW '- 1.5'S \ `4 I ❑❑ EXISTING DECK. r---1 Village of Rye Brook Grading Notes S� 17 a `� BAY❑❑ / 1 CONC I t 1.Excess soil to be removed from site to avoid long temp stockpiling on site \ ,�+��, \ --- _j / 1 , _INASHOUT1 2.A rough grading Inspection shall be called for with the Village Engineer C2 176 \ t;�as•MAPLE AC L. J 1 pp pl n9 rough grading \ / , 1 upon oom eU n of first floor framing and ro h dI {: MAP��178� -_ 2 1/2 STORY_-' ,r � z°•�'��''� ST RAID 1 '` �18U TREE ��r 1�E �22\RAAPLU` \ y L FILTER AM(V�E HOUSE t Referanoe B• \ W1 CARTRIDGE FILTER(NO Ma I74 p �' BACKWASH DISCHARGq i I �1 \ \ \ CONS rRuccla 1.Survey information shown was taken from a Topographic Survey of Property �lg 24•MAPLE \ ` `�. "-j ncGEss p CEO prepared by AU;istotte Boumazos,P C dated September 15,2006 �� ND SE�ACyf Z6•MAPLE � �18"TREE 0� �.. "r � 18�# -�~ --� �_ -, 1"� -_ CEO `� �_ I COY Run, WAih CAM CATE �\ PLAT. �� \ \186\ \ �S-EoPwc i 6'TREE 16' } Village Of Rye a Brook Notes TR£\"c \ 7'TREE �\ ` .� 24"MAnf K \ \ �\ sloNes r HEW�OC e \� 188 \ \ ` r RAG.WIX I.,� t r MAPLE 1 All driveway work shall conform with the Village of Rye Brook code o is MAPLE �.. 6•TREE 176 \-6'MAPLE � `\ T k RAIL ONCE`_� ` --_---_-- 01�'"", 2.Erosion oorlb-oi measures must be properly installed,maintained so the 6' - - dirt and debris is not deposited on street • - MAPLE\ \ EE a ��� r\ LOT AREA- 44.4�42.1.$�SFt c1 7'HEMLcxx 3.Exposed areas must be stabilized as soon as alterations are completed. W \�\ � ta'T4£E 4.Any underground structures lures must be inspected prior to bacdilling. a o-Mtr J \ \ \ Ror��u 1+eeu \ 5.A minimum of 24 hours notice is required for an i R�S00 00� ®s Nd•o®�t�`o m \ \ ` \ � ��\ \\ r TREE \ 07-TREE C4 MANNG REVIEW C� 178` uoi Im REMEW IS FOR OENEMt.O_ME T \\` \ to Am MWTM.TIE VfL 86 OF F O y C �o o MAPLE ` \ Z RESPO FOR 00� pET/1ilS.FIELD COND ta'TREE W NN M FESSKAW ♦^ 8•TREE NO EXCEPTION 1 ,�_%� TAKEN NOTED -_ L 317.16 �� :� C 0� ~- _ -- L� s MAKE CORRECTIONS NO • .` Q= H'LLANDA ~�-== AMEND AND RESUBMIT (n m---�-------- _-� - Curb_� C a`_T ll REJECTED•REFER TO REMARKS n/ 'C �rc --� t RYE OK ENGINEERING DEP W W % BRO 9M KING STREET , _ ._ >y ROAD LEGEND Nrowerr ! RYE 39.0 53 FAX t}573 9 a+ 1 a U - coc BllM oss LOT SEWER SERVICE a pHONE(914)9 (919 � DIRAINAM WLEr 0Soo SEWER CLEAw-0ur DUO=TREE.SIM T1YE SEM MANHOLE •� Lai STORM SERVICE FIRE AARMM SPLICE Box ElW V HURTER VALVE OAS rL r :� LOT WATER SERVICE TRAFFIC SIGN ®G V GAS VALVE �- 0 ® OPAIN011a MANHOLE eE-x EZEEC RIIC CROSSING _r ROOF LEADER ® UTILITY BOX ® ELECTRIC MANHOLE . LIMMI0.E STREET SIGN CEO wwry BOX MANHOLE UMAY POLE TP TEST PTr e,M MONIANXT SET °TRANSFORMER EXSiRMG SPOT T2FYATIpH ®PT POW+aaa TEsr v ' PROPERTY Ln� CURB LINE - CURB CUr EIRSTNMC CONTOUR-INDEX txUMerwR-INTER APvfbOooMirlTE LOCATIai of 1rAEIR MMAate EXISTING ORA*V4E LINE REVIS_ SCALE 1*--W PROPOSED CONTOURS ApPROcoMArE U x"M OF a-PVC SWIARY SeM PLAN AUG 13 2021 FOICE UWIT OF OWLIRBIN14CE DATE DATE:DEC.14,2020 ---SF&CF-- SILT FENCE AM CONSTRucnDN OK FENCE BUILDING DEPARTMENT SHEET 1 OF 2 X8Mp EXISTING.TREE To BE REMOVED JOB No. 1198 I A A A A e o N • z Z Z M11 Z o &� Z • S Qb�,►pi1-�i5 • may ' • ■ • -�— I / Ord N1 00 V n� C5 7- 0 MAP ` a ESTER�E� 2 fewN O COLL g • r 0. 3AV NIOONI1 1p v m 14P p / ,♦ 4co CD Als ; 0 IMP �4b OD C)O /� ` `� ♦ Imo g ••� _ ,�Op * �' `. I'VCOIN LN Z � C s s ago c �+ w 1A { � o j � ''�!�' � ♦r ENE R�p�E R �1 `�► p ,' .,S, � - _ .� \ � k^ � WA � + ; � Ap M.t . r■ s1t � � .a L, �- --{ �rb j �y D ids .` LA q -; -,._..- vp ev LA m • -4 - �, v t dd CIO - n -� O , i �j �o m O,Q *0 OG Ln La 4# pp 3- 010 V a I I I r!--Y—�- ok FE AJoe IF 0* w , T r M 11�'i ■ r r ifr sir A of w 7 j .� � A b*►` + 1 * �.. S 1. `♦ ♦ D �►' /. we jp OR � TO ♦ �► y'� 1,01♦ol 'awn � ♦ � /HNS r .001 rb 6 o01 � TAM , ^a do` A �./ It 414 -- WINDSOR RD ��CD CD w ` io = C A yUTC 1* --�% `� •,, _ t �Ri A ♦ / ■����Nds s Igo,A • �`�4♦ ,R �► m - �FRPkY s �. — •�� i moos* *����� f �, ! >; w �►4#4 � � �,/ r #••�•';; d ••w� ♦ +. ' 1w � �"' i ► z / by N z ,. «i . H� ` � �� ARSON -/, - w 0 •l ! ~ r �,ar 1p wr % o� t °p oy d'6 by dip �M /� 46 'CID go Q / Z>N •t�' id 's, ♦ ` � Eoi r 00 � +. �rl► `,,/ , A 40' loll Ctw A J ° �N o N O (a of r �}' A_' ^Cv" A { 1.i�rhr A •4'S y. A7• .lA� TAB y� rr .• ;N5�� ��L�,�•�y ��,, �Rk"F.• fi. `�. 7 wa�a.. fF ¢_y�.^w . Gi, K,dt4�FL*e •ia'.4SY.aJ�'(•,�XS � `i�lf,} . 4,�. r �!•w5 Z:' �� Im �1(tt>•)> hf 11 ;bru.-ir..�.f�s s �1 111,• - - `� a r f, 11�, l it _'t} ! t i�, �( t �� C � � •A� y V O 7 a y N . , . N At • •I U = CAI. a Z r r 3 Sys. Co L L Zc 7E 82.� LU J. LLJ ♦Q) X Cr z J OW - r AElz f`WL; ;y �� rL�•7 y � ;J :J Cz��� ,_� CD N �co may== �f p s f-. g �1+t�, ..� -"•53-' }t���,:_.x 1 yr,�, !f^v'�-- t t��f-+'aa�'�o'R".•-""1,"=s�s'"'t€t;:-7 � '�s.'a`. og"`'-„"�' �' �(ss)>� - J �" 4.', �� � !p $f,, li Iti d�ly4 11 t •�1 t� �_ A •• .A � .�� �A t a•.. � .� ��sA �p.`r'• i'�i►� � •�i(�` f� A�t` `��i/i•� erg.` =+ x`tZ w d' •Vbf. w �6f �✓ fAP ♦a F t �. �1 �,ti � •G Y 6 t_ Y.�� i��- �7�1!,1 J..: ��g.._"o��1�. -..�t F•�Yjh�}:' � � 5 ti r f�� `• �t � ��r• w ��^�' ^ ,, A��® DATE(MM DDIYYYYI CC CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE 1o/z7ID /2020 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND,EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S),AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER,AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED,the policy(ies)must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED,subject to the terms and conditions of the policy,certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). PRODUCER CONTACT John Andros NAME BNC Insurance Agency PHONE (914)937-1230 nlc No): (914)937-1124 90 South Ridge Street E-MAIL s landros@bncagency com ADDRE INSURER(S)AFFORDING COVERAGE I NAIC Rye Brook NY 10573 INSURER A: Continental Casualty Cc 20443 INSURED INSURER . NGM Insurance Company 14788 Cardillo Pools&Spas.Inc INSURER C 128 Mt Joy Place INSURER D: INSURER E New Rochelle NY 10804 INSURER F COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: CL204396175 REVISION NUMBER: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT.TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN,THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS FA TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY EFF POLICY EXP INSD WVD POLICY NUMBER MMlDD/YYYY MMIDO/YYYY LIMITS X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE S 2,000,000 �/ DAMAGEN 300,000 C.AIMS-MADE X OCCUR PREMISES Ea ocwrrenca S X Contractual Liability MED EXP(Anyore person) S 10.000 Y 6045315942 04/21/2020 04/21/2021 PERSONAL&ADV NJURY S 2.000.000 GEN'L AGGREGATE OMIT APPLIES PER GENERAL AGGREGATE 5 4,000.000 POL:Cv X PRO 4,000.000 JECT LOC PRODUCTS-COMP,OP AGG S OTHER AGGR S AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY COMB&NED SINGLE LIMIT S 1.000,000 IF a acGden! X ANY AUTO BODILY INJURY(Pe,person) S B OWNED SCHEDC:EO B2UO781K 04/17/2020 04/17/2021 BODILY INJURY IF.,accidents S AUTOS ONLY AUTOS X HIRED Ix NON-OWNED PROPERTY DAMAGE S AUTOS ONLY AUTOS ONLY Per acudant PIP-Basic S 50.000 UMBRELLA LIAR OCCUR EACH OCCURRENCE S EXCESS LIAR HCLAIMS-MACE AGGREGATE s DED RETENTIONS S WORKERS COMPENSATION PER OTH- AND EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY Y/N STATUTE I I ER ANY PROPRIETOR:PARTNERIEXECUTIVE OFF,CERWEMBER EXCLUDED ElN/A E. EACH ACCIDENT S (Mandatory in NH) E L DISEASE EA EMPLOYEE S I'yes.describe under DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below E L DISEASE-POLICY LIMIT S DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONS I VEHICLES (ACORD 101,Additional Remarks Schedule.may be attached if more space is required) The Certificate Holder Is included as an additional Insured when required under written Contract or Agreement CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF,NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN Village of Rye Brook ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. 938 King Street AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Rye Brook NY 10573 �J'�-— ©1988.2015 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. ACORD 25(2016/03) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD NYSIF New York State Insurance Fund 199 CHURCH STREET,NEW YORK,N.Y. 10007-1100 nysif.com CERTIFICATE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION INSURANCE 0 �0 """A A" 562634751 '1 •� LEVITT-FUIRST ASSOCIATES LTD 520 WHITE PLAINS ROAD,2ND FL TARRYTOWN NY 10591 SCAN TO VALIDATE AND SUBSCRIBE POLICYHOLDER CERTIFICATE HOLDER CARDILLO POOLS & SPAS INC VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK 128 MT JOY PLACE 938 KING STREET NEW ROCHELLE NY 10801 RYE BROOK NY 10573 POLICY NUMBER CERTIFICATE NUMBER POLICY PERIOD DATE G2072 061-1 704579 06/29/2020 TO 06/29/2021 10/27/2020 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICYHOLDER NAMED ABOVE IS INSURED WITH THE NEW YORK STATE INSURANCE FUND UNDER POLICY NO. 2072 061-1. COVERING THE ENTIRE OBLIGATION OF THIS POLICYHOLDER FOR WORKERS' COMPENSATION UNDER THE NEW YORK WORKERS' COMPENSATION LAW WITH RESPECT TO ALL OPERATIONS IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK, EXCEPT AS INDICATED BELOW. IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE NOTIFICATIONS REGARDING SAID POLICY,INCLUDING ANY NOTIFICATION OF CANCELLATIONS, OR TO VALIDATE THIS CERTIFICATE,VISIT OUR WEBSITE AT HTTPS:/fWWW.NYSIF.COM/CERT/CERTVAL.ASP.THE NEW YORK STATE INSURANCE FUND IS NOT LIABLE IN THE EVENT OF FAILURE TO GIVE SUCH NOTIFICATIONS. THIS POLICY DOES NOT COVER CLAIMS OR SUITS THAT ARISE FROM BODILY INJURY SUFFERED BY THE OFFICERS OF THE INSURED CORPORATION. LUIGI CASALE-PRESIDENT KARINA CASALE-TREASURER CARDILLO POOLS&SPAS INC 2OF2 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS NOR INSURANCE COVERAGE UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICY. NEW YORK STATE INSURANCE FUND DIRECTOR,INSURANCE FUND UNDERWRITING VALIDATION NUMBER.426447845 U-26.3 AC"R" CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE FDATE(MM/DD/YYYY) 8/17/2021 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER,AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED,the policy(ies) must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). PRODUCER CONTANAME:CT Elizabeth Cox JAMERSON MCLEAN CORP PHONE 407 366-3482 A/C No: 407 366-8508 PO Box 621149 ADDRESS: elizabeth mcleaninsurance.com Oviedo, FL 32762 INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE NAM 0 INSURER A: The North River Insurance Company 21105 INSURED INSURERS: United States fire Insurance Company 21113 New England Propane Co., Inc. INSURERC: Certain Underwriters of Lloyd's Greenwich Propane Co., Inc. INSURERD: 162 Grassy Plain Street INSURERE: Bethel CT 06801 1 INSURERF: COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: REVISION NUMBER: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES.LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. INSR TYPE OF INSURANCE ADDL SUER, POLICY EFF POLICY EXP LTR POLICY NUMBER M/DD MM/DD LIMITS X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE $ 11000,000 E ToCLAIMS-MADE XI OCCUR PR MISES E.occurrence $ 100 OOO MED EXP(Any one person $ 5,000 A 506-900172-6 12/1/2020 12/1/2021 PERSONAL&ADV INJURY $ 1000000 GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: GENERAL AGGREGATE $ 4 000 000 X POLICY❑PRI- ECT LOC PRODUCTS-COMP/OP AGG $ 4,000,000 OTHER: $ AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY EeCOMBINEDBI tSINGLE LIMIT $ 1.OOO OOO X ANY AUTO BODILY INJURY(Per person) S OWNED A AUTOS ONLY AUTOSULED 506-900172-6 12/1/2020 12/1/2021 BODILY INJURY(Per acckkwd) $ XHIRED V NON-OWNED PROPERTY DAMAGE AUTOS ONLY /� AUTOS ONLY Per accident $ $ UMBRELLA LIAB X OCCUR EACH OCCURRENCE $ 4,000,000 C X EXCESS LIAR CLAIM 20•RENMA2000055-100082.00 12/1/2020 12/1/2021 AGGREGATE $ 4 000 000 DIED X I RETENTION 0 $ WORKERS COMPENSATION X I PERsA TE ER OTH- AND EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY Y/N ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE E.L.EACH ACCIDENT $ 1 000 000 B OFFICER/MEMBEREXCLUDED? ❑ N/A 408-740226-3 12/1/2020 12/1/2021 (Mandatory In NH) E.L.DISEASE-EA EMPLOYEE $ 1,000,000 If yes,describe under DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below E.L.DISEASE-POLICY LIMIT $ 1,000,000 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONS/VEHICLES (ACORD 101,Additional Remarks Schedule,may be attached If more space Is required) Email: ipetersen@ryebrook.org Re: Daniel Marks, 18 Hillandale Rd, Rye Brook, NY CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION Village of Rye Brook, NY SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE 938 King Street THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN Rye Brook, NY 10573 ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. Fax: 914-939-5801 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTA ©198 2015 C R CO RATIO II rights reserved. ACORD 26(2016/03) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD STATE OF NEW YORK WORKERS' COMPENSATION BOARD CERTIFICATE OF NYS WORKERS' COMPENSATION INSURANCE COVERAGE la.Legal Name&Address of Insured(Use street address only) lb.Business Telephone Number of Insured New England Propane Co., Inc. (203)792-7654 Greenwich Propane Co., Inc 162 Grassy Plain Street lc.NYS Unemployment Insurance Employer Bethel, CT 06830 Registration Number of Insured Work Location of Insured(Only required if coverage is specifically 1 d.Federal Employer Identification Number of Insured limited to certain locations in New York State, i.e., a Wrap-Up or Social Security Number Policy) 06-1255916 2.Name and Address of the Entity Requesting Proof of 3a. Name of Insurance Carrier Coverage(Entity Being Listed as the Certificate Bolder) United States Fire Insurance Company 3b.Policy Number of entity listed in box"la" Village of Rye Brook,NY 408-740226-3 938 King Street Rye Brook,NY 10573 3c. Policy effective period 12/01/2020 to 12/1/2021 3d. The Proprietor,Partners or Executive Officers are E included. (Only check box if all partners/officers included) X all excluded or certain partners/officers excluded. This certifies that the insurance carrier indicated above in box "T' insures the business referenced above in box "la" for workers' compensation under the New York State Workers'Compensation Law.(To use this form,New York(NY)must be listed under Item 3A on the INFORMATION PAGE of the workers'compensation insurance policy). The Insurance Carrier or its licensed agent will send this Certificate of Insurance to the entity listed above as the certificate holder in box"T'. The Insurance Carrier will also notify the above certificate holder within 10 days IFa policy is canceled due to nonpayment ofpremiums or within 30 days IF there are reasons other than nonpayment of premiums that cancel the policy or eliminate the insured from the coverage indicated on this Certificate. (These notices may be sent by regular mail.) Otherwise,this Certificate is valid for one year after this form is approved by the insurance carrier or its licensed agent,or until the policy expiration date listed in box"3c",whichever is earlier. Please Note: Upon the cancellation of the workers' compensation policy indicated on this form,if the business continues to be named on a permit,license or contract issued by a certificate holder,the business must provide that certificate holder with a new Certificate of Workers' Compensation Coverage or other authorized proof that the business is complying with the mandatory coverage requirements of the New York State Workers'Compensation Law. Under penalty of perjury,I certify that I am an authorized representative or licensed agent of the insurance carrier referenced above and that the named insured has the coverage as depicted on this form. Approved by: Gary McLean (Print name of authorized representative or licensed agent of insurance carrier) Approved by: j�� 08/17/2021 (Signature) (Date) Title: President Telephone Number of authorized representative or licensed agent of insurance carrier: 800-393-6640 Please Note: Only insurance carriers and their licensed agents are authorized to issue Form C-105.2. Insurance brokers are NOT authorized to issue it. C-105.2(9-07) www.wcb.state.ny.us Laura Petersen From: Mike Izzo Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2021 8:06 AM To: Tara Gerardi; Laura Petersen Subject: FW: Message from Dig Safely New York, Inc. (DSNY) Michael J. Izzo Building & Fire Inspector Village of Rye Brook, NY (914) 939-0668 -----Original Message----- From: Dig Safely New York Exactix <tickets@exactix.digsafelynewyork.com> Sent: Monday, August 16, 2021 4:47 PM To: Mike Izzo <MIzzo@ryebrook.org> Subject: Message from Dig Safely New York, Inc. (DSNY) ****REGULAR**** DIG REQUEST from DSNY for: VIL RYE BROOK Taken: 08/16/2021 16:46 To: VIL RYE BROOK PRIMARY Transmitted: 08/16/2021 16:47 00001 Ticket: 08161-002-535-00 Type: Regular Previous Ticket: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ State: NY County: WESTCHESTER Place: RYE BROOK Addr: From: 18 To: Name: HILLANDALE RD Cross: From: To: Name: Offset: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Locate: WORKING ON BACK OF HOUSE NEXT TO EXISTING DECK STAIRS ON SOUTH SIDE, ALONG SIDE TO POOL FILTER, WILL BE MARKED SHORTLY NearSt: KING ST Means of Excavation: EXCAVATOR Blasting: N Site marked with white: N Boring/Directional Drilling: Y Within 25ft of Edge of Road: Y Work Type: INSTALL PROPANE TANK Estimated Work Complete Date: 09/07/2021 Depth of excavation: 6 FEET Site dimensions: Length 110 FEET Start Date and Time: 08/20/2021 07:00 Must Start By: 09/03/2021 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Contact Name: LEAH CRUZ Company- GURDIA LANDSCAPE Addrl: 4 BROADWAY Addr2: SUITE #10 1 City: VALHALLA State: NY Zip: 10595 Phone: 914-997-0224 Fax: Email: gurdia.landscape@gmail.com Field Contact: CARMINE GIZZO Alt Phone: 914-490-4171 Working for: RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Comments: Lookup Type: PARCEL ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Members: ALTICE USA CONED SUEZ WTR WESTCHESTER TEN GAS-HDS VLY VIL RYE BROOK WESTCHESTER CTY SWR 2 Laura Petersen From: Mike Izzo Sent: Tuesday, April 6, 2021 1:43 PM To: Tara Gerardi; Laura Petersen Subject: FW: Message from Dig Safely New York, Inc. (DSNY) Michael J. Izzo Building & Fire Inspector Village of Rye Brook, NY (914) 939-0668 -----Original Message----- From: Dig Safely New York Exactix<tickets@exactix.digsafelynewyork.com> Sent: Tuesday, April 6, 2021 1:04 PM To: Mike Izzo<Mlzzo@ryebrook.org> Subject: Message from Dig Safely New York, Inc. (DSNY) ****REGULAR**** DIG REQUEST from DSNY for: VIL RYE BROOK Taken: 04/06/2021 13:03 To: VIL RYE BROOK PRIMARY Transmitted: 04/06/2021 13:04 00006 Ticket: 04061-001-972-00 Type: Regular Previous Ticket: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ State: NY County: WESTCHESTER Place: RYE BROOK Addr: From: 18 To: Name: HILLANDALE RD Cross: From: To: Name: Offset: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Locate: BACK YARD NearSt: KING ST& LOCH LN Means of Excavation: EXCAVATOR Blasting: N Site marked with white: Y Boring/Directional Drilling: N Within 25ft of Edge of Road: N Work Type: INSTALL POOL Estimated Work Complete Date: 06/30/2021 Depth of excavation: 7.5 FEET Site dimensions: Length 50 FEET Width 20 FEET Start Date and Time: 04/09/2021 07:00 Must Start By: 04/23/2021 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Contact Name: MARIE CIANCIO Company: CARDILLO POOLS & SPAS Addr1: 128 MOUNT JOY PL Addr2: PO BOX 88 City: NEW ROCHELLE State: NY Zip: 10801 Phone: 914-235-0883 Fax: Email: marie@cardillopools.com Field Contact: MARIE CIANCIO Alt Phone: 914-235-0883 Email: marie@cardillopools.com 1 Working for: MARKS ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Comments: Lookup Type: PARCEL ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Members: ALTICE USA CON-ED SUEZ WTR WESTCHESTER TEN GAS-HDS VLY VIL RYE BROOK WESTCHESTER CTY SWR 2 Laura Petersen From: Mike Izzo Sent: Monday, April 19, 2021 1:29 PM To: Tara Gerardi; Laura Petersen Subject: FW: Message from Dig Safely New York, Inc. (DSNY) Michael J. Izzo Building& Fire Inspector Village of Rye Brook, NY (914) 939-0668 -----Original Message----- From: Dig Safely New York Exactix<tickets@exactix.digsafelynewyork.com> Sent: Monday, April 19, 2021 10:52 AM To: Mike Izzo<Mlzzo@ryebrook.org> Subject: Message from Dig Safely New York, Inc. (DSNY) ****REGULAR**** DIG REQUEST from DSNY for: VIL RYE BROOK Taken: 04/19/2021 10:50 To: VIL RYE BROOK PRIMARY Transmitted: 04/19/2021 10:52 00002 Ticket: 04191-001-092-00 Type: Regular Previous Ticket: 04061-001-972-00 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ State: NY County: WESTCHESTER Place: RYE BROOK Addr: From: 18 To: Name: HILLANDALE RD Cross: From: To: Name: Offset: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Locate: BACK YARD NearSt: KING ST& LOCH LN Means of Excavation: EXCAVATOR Blasting: N Site marked with white: Y Boring/Directional Drilling: N Within 25ft of Edge of Road: N Work Type: INSTALL POOL Estimated Work Complete Date: 04/22/2021 Depth of excavation: 7.5 FEET Site dimensions: Length 50 FEET Width 20 FEET Start Date and Time: 04/22/2021 07:00 Must Start By: 05/06/2021 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Contact Name: MARIE CIANCIO Company: CARDILLO POOLS & SPAS Addr1: 128 MOUNT JOY PL Addr2: PO BOX 88 City: NEW ROCHELLE State: NY Zip: 10801 Phone: 914-235-0883 Fax: Email: marie@cardillopools.com Field Contact: MARIE CIANCIO Alt Phone: 914-235-0883 Email: marie@cardillopools.com 1 Working for: MARKS ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Comments: Lookup Type: PARCEL ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Members: ALTICE USA CON-ED SUEZ WTR WESTCHESTER TEN GAS-HDS VLY VIL RYE BROOK WESTCHESTER CTY SWR 2 f I N C CD D Q<�< �:TO O EFHQ Q +p< a c)oo nm r 0o � o o �� °t�II II Q II Q N °< Q m � D cn Q CD (A :3� (A` c0 o® 77 Q CDo+o < woo,o W wvn o cA Wraok �. ``: - - ..•. 0O o- cn 0 Cn cn OA X rn-n'"o p 'A 101 CD N CD Q O�!n- 00 p Oy t -*0/ Zo V o2 A O. � o r� O `> '.¢ 's: 0 L4 W o h co o Q p C)X o.z=Q Mill `"j < p pOr+ o .O _+1 (n 0(A O Q D� QCD f X\ CD O-t-f Q Q Q :301 (D 00 1 / C n LO ttOD ..Y 1..:�.i�i�::::iiii::`•::;:: `i`i:�i;::;i;i si`ii�i�i:`:ii�.......:....:...•..........,.....-.,.� �(DOD r vz= : ::. ' rn O..:.... : : W OI o. To ; ; a i 1• O DL p J ill ? EE OD vTis 'V \ n •a \ Q :ii { ♦ N 1 1 .I.i E t0 %• l{ � I I Of > Ila 0 ca 0 o- O 00 a 3 .. CTIE:S•: 46 \ i \\\ --� �♦ AD, co N C 7 (A \ `e:•c: e. OD OD 1;1 -fin N N co p ••r: 0 `\\`�\ \,s�\ S O_ :.e.. � •_00_ \ `\ CD CD CIS r �� _ co � .\ o s o — n �o v W OD ` 7 .! J ':;:'4. O (T \ wry O O O) \ \ ,4( (D \ Vl \ N (D .I l.� m \ (D \ 1 \ S 0 I G o \(D G I / L m \ III I v I � \ O O- I \ S \ rn \ S / s c Q I \ 1 OD Cn S \ 1 A C lV U (JI O ^ �- -�ar0 OD rill 0- ` au J (0 0 8ro 32 o UO Q a �pp'QOpW J fl- CD co �pMan1�� 001 rn .� 'm quo v 7 \•� �J,\1 C) j AOVa / O 0 N n a �rs�c a CD o 8 VV= n O a _ 50 3 � � � W N Q 6' {{ _ -�{{ . -►�I U coC 7'0 3 7 C c t°O C 7 0 D 0 0 0 N 7' N C O u)c S-- 7•C O 7' v •z m C uj Q"0 O 1 O 7 .(D O . <N (D<"O(p v N N<7 C<y O (i�3°'rt 7 `-�.O-• < 0 0 < O (� N c N N(D:O 1<0 M (D Q C O 7 (D a Os fn 9:'6 N(D�� �mov�i$ c Z n�p Q °0 ® m °o cM nm`�m0w o° mm o.3 0o0 0-K3(n morno N m G �<O _rt Ort 0 7 0 ° y O O •°°0037-•c° O g rn rn i1 `� O(D rt�7 0 9.(D-+• O 7 7 rn °a0 °-N'"•7°-rt 7 7(D(D _7 v-- _ O F_ CDD-D1 D D D D D D w NrtNOnmo7<•°_ m o a°�+ _ao No��3 p aO s3CL 51 O O O_ O r �j r fn n Z M =__=n �,S°c (D l°7 N _7•o O rt A° != 7 '*O 7 O r m z g �., r V) -1 D Z Z Z Z 7 N O av (D c N l 7 c N 5 N 7 3-• OO S 7 N.d p 0 ri '~ f D <.'0 S 0 y S �1-�y (q ,.O 7 rt O m (D(D w ti O z z`�o m A m D Z O O O O L-i O(D 3`D a 3:o(D O m=•v Q.+'� -m(a`<7 m L) -<•-. m C C O rn m�R. p l7 C�•I r W -0 ^^m i. �J �p rt° N 7 7 rci-3 O rt N 3< rt N O 3 O.O+Q O O �,•7•m7 r/� O p N m � (n `-�-O S(D to(O/)-°'m N M C N fD k< O (D OCD 7 O 7 (D fN W 0 V I z G F-m Z Z N N rt rt N rt°_°a a° fD 7 t�z °C' A Zc 70 C-5 p m D N•��°•M E:,' Q X 7 0 7 aa�m CD O 7'rn Ow:)o 3o(A c_ 0 N v ^' $� �• m m Z °�c °( n a v .. -.,�, 73°O`�g OVA o �.vzQ=D =A.. Q°70700°rt ozvvN° o nrn � 000(>i rx O m yM j07N7jC m>0° rnN a onv 9•a_` -s7 0cr m z o m2��=<Aoo CIO 0 m `�w�oho--or--- ��m�mrt r+ ° ��,m`gym°°� .. J x ��� m z O.zNO i£D 7 00 OV1OOrtcOc EG-o7�'D N_0 rt° N°`�7rtK O7 7 ad �/L, <$ >"x' �m °3<rt�(D.*Fy7o co rt� O 7 c °--o= .N S to DO 1 1 �o m m� N od_rtNO°ScN� :°o off$=r °o3.zD��v°°7N �� t-+ a 6°^c�� osmC7 c �� .O0—3(bT. 0�m° 3 °0°�° 7�m�°°7m°scM2 �00 H W o+0i z Nm z rt 0'� `�mo°,Oo m .�3N m �7+a��m°3-.M o0 .� O C $ Q p m a v v o O 7•D 7 7� �I I il Z ul r�C v 0 m O v 7 0 7 t0 c N N a 7 U°a -� N I) o O� z rn°c o v .o° (JJ m °Fio zp n vc3 °3om�� �mx." m o° Orn wn 7 m N 5 �Noo�o rn r o O g r N In m<N°c mv73a awl +7O5? 5—oas W ` m O c w m r'�oo N 1 111 I! O O--1 O�7 D Z z N`•<X(n�•r�—0"'a Ox Ul o 7°O (D D_p(p`c����X N 3 I � Ci az $o`m O w LI U -i >D x m r -v m °-.�N rt o-• o m X rn m�W -°3 °- O ��y c<v $K o r r n 7<n(D N n 7 3 ° rt(b (A Q O i7 7 rtN N O c '°'� ^� rm- c)o Ln m D -U r 0 CD 0 rt�° v°3�rn 3 3 `<m not.a^°rn 3 C •-�� o o v 0 C r O D 0 c o-. rn (!l 0 N o c m °v 0) L N� � $N N.J. < D p r<< .N-,cAi o oo 3�rn 7�°v o .3 y(A-:3 O' O m >'2 N z o Cfl :1:p D O j m D> m _I �.i°(��°7 7 °m v o ^j 1< °N rtN 7 4i J s� 0mm nm� �� O m m O O m ° 70Z<o3`< �i7 0� 7 rn6 ��O 70 7?3 y;O m O I I, Z D Z Z rt N C7 -U ma 3 N O�O 2 c O S f N O n•'�r r(n�, IS iiDbrii to f O ' N O ° rt�G(11 7 _1 O m o ti 0 S�S -a O 3 N ° y s �. CD - (D 7 N r �z K Z a 0—, (CD rn3 n 0) 0 0 Lo E 0 410 C: b o E 0 OC) 0 > LO 0 0 0 C) 5� 00 E o0 Ln E C--j C=D oC�j Zoo z Vcli U- 0 Lo L- ry 0 C( Lli Z :3 ao 0 Ol 2 - x 0 V) Ld 0 0 C z -0 11 rc 0 fl 1: 0 c- 00 U) z c, 0 L. D LL z >< c z Ln 0 Q) < 0 4o :zc Q) '(-0 E 0 7 LLJ Li a_ LIC < geN.......... CN 71 0 0 ez,09 0 0 Ln 06 0 ry 0 0 o 0 0 -1-0, L) 0 oreo 0 _0 c 0 0 4.1 Ur ors o 0 0 .V� 0 Oa- 06 Q) 0 u L-- 0 r- 0 C: c'- 0 ® Q) 0 _0 0 0 0 < 0 0 Go c Q .0 0 F) E LL O\( 0 0— E 0 CD 41 ---------------- Off vi 0 CR-j ------ 0 IS, F.2 -�, 41)o %------- V) CY- E- -c Z rL-rl-r 0 I cn IT M Q) 00 LL x N I.Lo Qm 60 0'a 0 - =E ry 0 0 0 0 Ln N r 0 - - -j C-) 0 c c 0 0 0 4 C) 0 C) LLJ.0 OL Q)(zp, E U C) 2� ........... C: 0 m CN 0 06 c o N O .2 C) Q) (D -�z '80 2 C) o 'a (A 00 0 ova 0) > a C) 0) 0 L) Q) 0 00 IN a) M 4z E (1) Q) C/) 0 > Q 0-0 0 >11'4- 0 E Do -5 z Q) 0 4-1 V)3: U) V) Q) 0 (3) M (a) (1) 00 >- 4- 0 = 0 4- -4-- 0 0 C) a 0-0 0 0 .20 U) -0 Q->-�0 ry .20 C: ry > > � C: 0 (1)_0 C 0 0 C) c 9 0 C) . V) (.D 0 LLJ m L- 0-J 0 0 a) 4- Q) U) c vi*5 E E CIO 0 0 Nul x (D 0 C: O/up N C: rD 0 ................................... �y 0 1-� (a a Q) 0 !E� 4-1 0 0 0 0 0(U V) C) -) m— 0 L 4- c 0 m 251 c(U 0 Q) >� 0 (D >1 4� 0 251 >,Q)-0 ry c: o 5, (n a)4- U) 0 IS ...... 'o %- 0 Q) 00 n > :5 >1 Q) 0 o V)cr- C: Ln In LO _0 x < ,4- 0 4--_0 Q)Q) c IN 0 Q) co 0 m o 3: Q) V) 0:t 0 0-C > <�- 0 2 U)C-) ON m< CN O QU) 0 �; ..J 0 00 " o LO �0.�� i �' �� inW-zno Z v z a� -4Va O�xE `� zLd O 0 � 7 o 2t�0 mv U} } 0Z Z LLJ to' - O ..o Z 0- `y o z In N- Q v> 6N O V c W CL_ L I G� y o p 0C- 1 J ++0 z gg N'...._... 41 o 0 Z Q�� C� ory N N ?' O L J `I I LL �) Cl- LIJ -- r N inn a U n O luul c co v e d(.) p, O N CO ono } c 0 c nG r•a'd 11 °° m ,? ro `•`t`k m ro v c. U r one u ® O v �•� �4' of rn rn� Wa� o � o �r ° o �c c oN o l 8 ✓p p �' v -O Macad°' ono � �-- m p r r L O Z CnN o �zic!? a CL ui o N rA s a •g�, 9 a r �.N to Ca _- t1 V O� O N r Ni '`♦ ^) <es— `♦` \�♦` rO i o t7 ��; v C- N co O ` m 'o- ♦ a to o'.N p m N O `♦.S�``. .`` Odl� ♦`. ` O O i r i I E t 3 0 ` le� c3. G \to In p 1' 3 _ .- - 'cb o j ♦♦old ♦` ^ n �� `% , CD °y O O O r O , ll, 7 U.Q ```` ` t �S! ,,``�!%% C�,` ,p !• ,yam, 7 _ ` O N z c'S N0. 0. cp o o N E - 0 `�♦♦ - cl O C) � r - O i oLD r ♦� � N ♦ 0''3 j-' d• N e•y QI in c m 4C O I O ------- -- F-� `pip\ tD .; O L `. NM p O C O ,.I`_ (p ` 1 1. `'t• 0 N_] Q'J 0.0 c I Mi 'a 0) Z(.LILT tot (n .E o N ��`♦ Of p 1 I 1 m 1 ro � 0 m F-♦-♦- c o 1 In a) o (a ,tQ ,p U—1 i N i Ut i t)p i u o+ \ 1°f♦ O m O U CLO W , v r7 1 I Cf 1 I.1 t a o a s -t t 1 �� - 0 cm 3 E `\ /may``♦ ". % N` (� `.-Z O C00 �♦ `• G a o m ♦♦ a v -t �♦ `♦ d N M O V ` O c O m 01 `♦ ZD♦ 10 O N r U o c L a i^ co 0 U N a t o +� 1 O N in o 4 m 1 `! d• oo i O N m N 1 -O 10 of U } � tll O I Z q 0 1� ; m o � �Ltg� M 1 3 zt�' N L co 0 p ^�'� '� U® Na O U a) + cJ —0 c a N r 1 .0 wo il- p �� r��N �c� O®,`1 v (n co >, � E � ac s c� o co (D > —75 z 0 a)c m aQi CD-0 �� '�� �� v (n J:00 v 4- O i v ° AGO O. N O O s_ .0 °4- O O- �./ o O m +, U) c 0--� O O ++Uj•� 3 4+- �y r��, ®®® C tJ t1 C �O 0 0 V) `1 C.� O 00 0 Q rn ° `• c Of s` 0 po O 0 d ® ao p m O) L M� Q t o a 0 �N °° r 0, �� �J °c =c v+� r O� O 1S to °0 0)E °L U a �" '0 1 N >,C)'tn Q 0 O 0 °c to > a) 01 �'7 `-c rn O (n(r��>z�° J mC C ►�w-O+�-0 )Lrr) m _ _ O� °C 0�++T N� �� mm Q m c 3 O C Y Ny a) QF°—ran�'cn U ON (n Q c" a) Dv N '- (n N � 0 CD Ow O �- 0 Lo 0 0 el m 0 LO N r)OC) v N w w 00 ,n L1LI] U-o w 0 zroo w oZ z (ZW N zLC)a g� O ° \ �z Oz ..o � Ld z __O O Q O 0 � 0 ty O' O N w p a04 rr, 7 ff1^ gN 'o 0 o� LO gZl� `� b Mll o 0 p� �0 0 M Q - '----- caLO ta a `D �^ �� > CD c �• LD o } cn >, o O N b (n U lk d a^o v erre e urb °f)e r o m o �r yew° h rn N' co a o co o c 1- O c O w _ o +s IN,, a ff: l9 rn (Cj 6, dam ur 0 0V1 oN l N D Q N N N y o Ci °�8 O co OooN r C9 0- oo� 1- s-� u�o N V o rO p 0 c0 �`' 3m o ��! ! N �.g _ o co OCT l/ d OIr m (J In Q rn o�' N t!) c in 05 S t` �• 1 0 i7to. �� O N r ! tn z c� T to. Leo s�. cot 3 Z c �e.. o O c 1 v; ��� �' o c5, �\ O C 1�- co C-3 00 \ 0. \ C 0 ! r r 4- w �r / \�`� a:sue to `�,o�s'l��`�' \\\ O Not' O o t 00 Go a o . 10 T (D O N o.- N 04- t co N C) U- O 1 0� O _- ------ `� �� ` t• t` O O B00 IZ C) O -- : O 04 .O. 1 ^_ 00 06 `'1.�\Q= N A�� d ornO S2 O o c c i � O N �` O\`'--- �- 0 5- � a to <o 3 �'' / 0 � �.__ r.T T �\\`O�\\ �LL z 1 1 CO I i ' C TO � t\P�\ a)X iN;LD;ODI U ai c ° Ip 00 ro vP r-I N ou \ 1S a� p Grj o o � o m OO V O o o co l N r7 V d 2 tl O O r +� N I O- `� ^� cD o C) t 1 \p t N 00 c0 ��/• d � U tl N r c 0 - � d ^ I �l o U fn (0 Ih t + [� Ln U p -0 O 0-) N N a h > O N N o Go M ^ o �►�•,� \`. O C)O C) CDm towsca' `t co r 0���3 0 L 0 - O i Z +; ti� pA O m�- (n z� Q � CO p ^ c° �A it N T 0""+�v 0 N A II N S� '� 6cc 0 C)Zv0' ° 00\ _0 L W lee m O N p oA\ E 0 S � a 0 Q) 0-)N E ✓ CD o O0�0N`- v0+- rn —0 cn m c- " g' D L v_0 c 4--- N ~ ~ t c O O W N m cn NUIoc To v > �� ao co co4� + 0 0 0 O > X L6 0 0 b a +- >0 O y ! 0 rn U)UJ� c O 6, 00 c O O N C) 0(n 0~0 N o� O "o� m ®®o1v z 0 o OCT� poo >, c Mo00 o 7 00 I/ U) v v v+� o Q E� J +J o �� ��Q�'�``- J O z Q 4-O O p O N O `— v '....... 0-) c v N 0 �, v d?i 0+� '> _O v 00 t c— c— I—F—co N> 0 C) m cn cn N r sus. sA• O 1% /�00 lb � s (3D � O O Hf. �A• ITI '* p 0 /so rn o.N 3 1 m z p O. / m � O m m m� a �d ® F o� R �op9�o _ / / A # > Om Z _ a' /N A W N O G/ a/I F Ili I / > 45 F / / O° 1 I 9 I Ar o my I m I m s. r 11)z / > >o ° O �' F K D ; ? / ® O o`♦ oo Sip m,T 14 cmz o55 J. mm, / m m,x yp �0• °zomo / / o� m �� `� F z z rn � y D y o >, / m T O O C o n o cpm yA�SF o \ \ mZT ��O \ O ,m0 O / / \ m mo �'F o <m ym \ P v rnT 000 0 / / �} ❑❑❑❑❑9❑❑LJi0110 ❑❑❑ > N m X z v 9 °Om 4 I `\ H X� D i o F mm om I `,5 0 co mK,: xm / 1 2 =C TZ`O �o O�/ I 1 mTp I ; D m ❑❑❑ y m I £o V / m n ❑❑❑ p� � �90 mo�O \ in O'• o_ ❑❑❑000 oc m z mo z c9 N m O y= r f � m Z � � 11 r I 1� 1 N o of r n0 � z0 me z I ov y0 p a _ srowe DMy o 6 L J um m m°I o II o _ S _ \ 25864 ' m \ \ \1 m x1 z' n ry .� IDU m I mN m A z o n O_a 2u< bo p_ < n \ m z o0 —v�N86'50'28 W� Er a p o p y c m 2 < a o m a c o a m m z G) g o IF m, o \ RF R o rEl oom � ss s --- 8 F N 9 g S A \ i N A W N m Vi A W N � y, 3 O J W C o.S O O N ..._ m m o Dm o3 o�v o N ° xd mm3 o d¢,oyaa= om�<o �^ DDm m mD m m c y mymNm�3w oao mmao pa, m_ O C N ..TJ C.-_+f fD�, n y=>N p y Ol j m 3 0. N O f0 y o d c N n O 7 O N f0 p o i O c (D 3 d sopu o'�n� o o-" d�_O D 3cc'°'m.o� m w 3 m �4ow d3��oa�� m�'�p� on�(D a m m Oe®Sm®O p o oy o£o p»d ocomo m'.f 2m_''.'9- �mymm�°'o�I'o�oyi� t.o S m >ao a a 3 o 3 is fD y m m a.� $ .°�..c d T x o p » M ,� < < »c dmy z Wy v3G� -3c o m ms p o s ��od moa�o�m �o�:,y i c 3 yy c o g .Ca 'moadmo m domes my4fD S' (D y C_y 3£ O d J �'TJ y::J y C Q y y 0 N O J c Np m� ,,.� < ood, oo>•£ topo o co �'y �m3�°»� o�a34�o ooQ4 w -z&n m E _ID 3 - on Iny m ip w o m 3 .o p m 2 N(D N N p y w N S d fD O O w w N y pl—3 • �n L•;J d y N-p d M d Ol O S'm j N O O.O p O'y=m O.O d y 0 fD O O N< O O o•.0..O.a.N .O O d K f�D D. >y O z 1 �i O.y m N O d 3 fG d° AN 3" =m J O aN NtG 7t0 N Nz m < cnm Boa om 'p^m Sm d 'pc ooE AID 5W.m fDa age yo»�3 a�o-c d� yCD m �o T 3 o mm a o m<a o'y o po N f° t0 S O N y O Z w'fD S^ 0 0 Srm»S 111 m N D,ZI N TJ 0) C O 6 N N N O O N O N y p �7 A Z Zyz m$ 3m iF a) a�<° m o d 3 20 03iu m �-�-YC m m O r3p yd �.W oc ma y-Sco. N o m me m T w mm o 0 o y� o m m o Mz� ' W n g rn m� m� 0,o g °g �5 op°d S, -'; m m tno y°o \ ;J03 I m ram £ oo mp 1co CD ' m mm d < o� �3 da o 0o d»op m a £ �y mm co 1 Am,Wpg A v m _nO o� my n!^ o' N o `°c n< o? m o o o w�xm m "{ p� Z �- m m ` omo TXiqz m 5 g01p m$-43! ;,D 90 rn zo A" z u) �� G MIM m aoo p T1 z m REVISIONS L (p C7 1 12/16/20 REVISED POOL AND POOL DECK PER CLIENT m SITE PLAN w CHRISTOPHER S.UTSCHIG,P.E. 2 01/121 REVISED DETENTION BASIN z m m D p 1 0 m 3 01/2929/21 REVISED POOL&R ET.WALL > m 4 0/21 REVISED POND ° �� Civil Engineering Design 218 '+aw 5 08/8121 REVISED POND ADDED CULTECS N N e Site- Stormwater - Construct/on 1W.717.7g1770171 MARKS RESIDENCE 0 85Ra/phAuenue >8Hi//anda/e Road NYhite P/ains,NY 90606 !age ofRye Brook,N.Y.>0573 CHRISTOPHER S.UTSCHIG NYS P.E.LIC.#090138-1 n P-'c / g��€,=4 y Fm 11 Z !11'IF. s y m z cn cn rn rn rn ��so � oo$$ o�=y pI N / $? A gy n m aOm Lm~D A O y O C A F m$80 <N Q $i i� y;m m r m =41$ S� I �R 8 n m Z m Im z / m 4 mg S�mmnKpz = s m n a o o€� SN ms=" w m ro g $411 $ 11 2i vlfm a 3 �mWp ; z 5 y Z m9 T N orn��D S �i 2 o g m� FnpZ A� e N oD NO zo Z m r �l I Fag.= 3g E5c�i 1Y�III—d• ?EH c'S�rfi: I 3.115 A �D cn n z $ JN y Ful F Rao ,I mm NN D2 xZ�D x c oM > v=cm D N 4A x v SD u Z 2 0 C N c>mo Do o N v ?9 o _T � N \ D n m ✓i// � g�mg> E g � 2 0 0 \ z ZO _ m m io do F 0ti D Z = o �De D D i rt W 5 i m m �09 o y r� E O _ N z Pam Z W 5 l N y z"c m z ? D o Atiz z�c'zo V) Z $g H sc a �$ z 3 O D Z —� 10'MIN. •••y:n..• 2.♦-n m M� i m$ �`i '^zo )� L) a O'MIN. �m x 8Nm m Z oo �oZ �o n H ; i 9m m $� oy? a zNo m~ 4i:` � Ao Z D D r5* m Z Do DO m N �A >O Z 1O m � m w A w < p 1 x =o=4 i spa�r � o m� �7 �z mF m �ggz' _�� oF, D _as g'RA p " m Z ' m `\ vZ m �0 4p��m�F' r�g�o MO F 'r^IR �8 fin;Noa o$��g� 0 m2 6$ o o �m Z 13 m 2�$ 0g"a_�" y g$ = n Oho _ A= s Z; m �2 m g 0 m C r y V1 F O~ �� �� �$ A L ao K2 y Z T� ;F H _I vS.EiSl�41•Y4i.... ?z •1 N� :drill ay '.f..r.3;.';.. r A y�co, rn n o v 3 O D m p Z Z o cv b�z N o wU TOA 03 c 0 -ci3 3— moZT z rn 3 O gm p A 3 p 3O N m mu Z= .m A m �N Op Gy 0� 32 n �2 D O Z� ? n n a m co T A _ m o A 02 Z m � z� DO 1_ TO 8o m v �O m En m m -Di D REVISIONS N --i "' CHRISTOPHER S.UTSCHIG,P.E. CONSTRUCTION DETAILS y O Z W N A Civil Engineering Design v N S/le- Slonmualer - Co/JSlrUCl/OR Managinenl MARKS RESIDENCE � z 65Ra017Auenue c HIh/le P/ains,NY 10606 >8Hi//anda/e Road N !///age ofRye Brook,N"Y"10573 CHRSTOPHER S.UTSCHIG NVS P.E.LIC.#090138-1 m -44'-0'HT.MIN 6" Z HIffik cn o T_I11°°Q N a II I II N cn o � a p w" o D� ..III a� D� III-I O D� � �" II a;O G O a n m��O a Z Z O a�0 r-D 4 b• r-D -III r- ,P�g F Z.Z m Za m n c�^m Z m a n z F`^z rn r IIII 8 cA f-fl r III III f-fl rR µ N > c O m z >v ii„ p 9 CD = S•8 WN I=1� ii 6l ?D8 o o m p� 5ZZ O�z m �'O m T>O p H rn - —1 �'� =o a Z a A m p a II a II a z F O F n H z F c z m F N _Z III— N Z £ 6� A F m'a Z m a H> O A pv N C Z o F a 1 rn a O III I �0n O £off 60� 3 Z p ut ut _ � ' s' r m Z F p o a =g 3 0 o 0 -1 sn� 4• A O o C7 q�g: 3�" a z a o > m Z o m m'a Z�^Z Z Z y Z -o 7� § �o� �� v i n A !'ll o £o a -1 cn a ci 9O _O W �' Z 1n O Z m m v s rpi 0 Om�t p o Z Z O An m�N�N'a Z C)N DEAN frnll H`H'm%r O m ;m O o p �,n gn A gm z��'� ° C7s N c N `.1 m ;mxx m �j 70 v n v 7 x 1 0 AO q4 D v� rn m '�o 4 Z SS N ;7 rn O ;4 n 0 (J1 o o(0n N - m 2 c> z a>a o z m7 z Ni crn N a A m g a o p mm CU 41 SG i ro>o a In m Zv m O O n O �i rt'0= O p u`Si Z io=O A N H y O Orn z ; 3 a o;p o O „u a S p 2ca a o >S -- > N ?m '�'o>^ 3 G a Z =o > N f i� Q ix��'o N o MZ z-mi`�A o z -1 Z as Z p S g m 2 pp`t'a m a C Arn o o u =F z N c m a s F a•�m a Z a a 1 F v _. m s o•� S; C Z�q p m v,Fl 4j 7i+ p 3 ut �'m i s p 7 ; F ^ o c Z T = A Z N C m mW o mN m Z O N r O g zo a v G OR z `a a m"1' N J 4 o T Z z 1 a o T � F 1 e 0 z z'� o X Z x O Z r > m 0 Z n A p 0 a�5 O a 0 �l 7 ; p c zd n D Z r'nn "O -rn II T- N O� O� -rn rn .......................11� z / m QQ • ................. 01 0° ®0 01 eo ® J# e3 C? O Q ' V co T V 0 • � a � 1 U) c na N rn 0' _ 7o u K a • z O a ° CSC D (b z G?r0 �J n N• fNT r fi �� rn [) O �• N \ A � T� T r z =n • \ c z4�rn �n m D rn m y a O\ N w rn-n v ro ur o it m Oo m Q N <rp O r o m m \ o D rnrn o �4 A \ -I X � N � O Oz0- alp➢ •' V \ V �i OnJ� . V \ A O W O 3 Q c �z OY VI ` X Q'..1p 00� • N Ii m p O- W �7. O >� 0 Off' U)�- '. a z p \� © 70 v \ o U V U Z V lUDDDw C f� tO o �DMB�IJQ P e m �I ^> 0 rn 91 v W � 218. O i • a '� z ` np o �o N36 0'2 s9 °o � �N m a z0 O D I-m p '3< O z W �( a m D rn0 O 7o O- m Z w O CZ r� -1 c m n z 70 r �� CZr v O m :j nJ O W N rn I TJ N o W rn rn p O^ f o dg L 0 3 a � I rnD oz0 rn rn D 5 5 rn n— p w iv < rn n(-n rn w p m Z GISIF �°�' �,- z D frn O rn 70 ---i OZ D zm �pa�m�� � c- In/Z � 7a � V 1 °su��mm�m oi �"oA0 r Z OOO c ° A 0 -O ^( rn C N ZC) > N 7O 0Drno � a N N 3 W I�© 0 8 s�Q z rn r 3 v Q W N N N N ti Y' ��w a50 O rn Z z f71 0 0 na° A 0 < o w — \Z J oO ILLJ (.D luO E pOO_ N N N N N N Gog o W ~ N � l3� z zp �� Z N1 W +Z,L (S) 6o z" Q Ln -Z �oC WQZp_ W Z N O K ►u w>- E — CO moo _ lu CL Q z s bdjS�� O Z �w o�u vJ J Q> cn wog LN W - >1 i6oa�°�a �� 5 uj LUOWC Q m Q Q m 3 Oz Q og�t> �� �3 H J = Q a o _ ;t;t 0 _ _ Inn t- O LO Q dU m < U Co _ — � fo m 8 U U g N O JQ WUzo II �O �IIVm'�hVo�aD7 -W oa + zO v Q ED J0 hNm N KD J N O OU Z ` U II z (M 10 Q _ m0 z1 U Z CS O 11 O z oa zU � Q> z �Zd ~ w O w:z U o = r— yc� o0�= Q c�N > o Oaaaa a — lu Q ZwO O U Lu ✓GQ C C o E uj Quj c � O a U) a oJo t0 Q H N H (fl N r,7 O qg S U G � E E - E r. _ E ,�6 Q E= E E ci# V Z•� 3 • a to U O `s I o f G, uerEs c; co II E F i2 E E E' E €_ - ° On8 of U tE r `E E E E E S E o yg 3' E E __ � # m L o 032rCur o`a ` Driveway = a n o_ o Macadam p�-o CD one urb E O if � L� v � V v E e-p - 'C- O U N U C M e QI1J p O F I J y ICo li.n no — nd• 0I es Qp ° �N O oe0 Z> 0 m g O z W K CJ ^ Ud Q z H J z J W Q 3 C� Q z ID H S ° L N Q�� L J j m lh O0 a•- Q ri F ,0 8 p Q Q V' n n s U Zp C- z n 'a• a J ch `�°Lu In Q i N a g Y M f O uj E 3 0 3 •z£'8! `a 8 '-_ o , W(L Q y Q LLL p m b 0 T --.--_. i _ QO��.00 • N LC OQ(� N U �� ryn_ goo �' h T - u p0 li a , _ [n 2 rno > oo _ mn o� MOcadum alre•ar N Q z m J O > 0a_ W O m m o p N � "O 1+ WW V O m m J ` Q ro O a ID Ozy- U' ax-- z m ¢V. W m —� _ --- z —• FL w cn n ^ O F � a •o U �.-- a° 0 0 14 -n W a .e d z o v' O 02 e ci a f IL N N = > O u o 0 a S ^� u p O i �N N O J �s 4ti; O z 0 O p o L LU n h O p 2 a '.• �t Jiv O CO n 2 H= v z z ' E® Q — p Q o o a d • 2 'LU T m > o oe F s• zQ v °2.. O LU °'off ro z=L Q=L z_j-J (D D-(n Cf) --��� Q Cl? c9 CP Z Z,p oO 0�0 • O b 'O Qp z� �— 30 co Q. Opt �`�Oo°N Do v h� �m N oz ii O co o k Q� II U II O \ O II m c0\ 6 > > oG 6)\ �t a 1 > O O p\� 1 O d� r-1 o S N 00 c6, c0 1+ N � O m ZCLNCL J v s E °c @ ; 6' K;yyS o OC ZOuIO _ s°°o s� = c)0, Q U w I.() U Q7 m y m m m cuN N� p'° N u E} o 0 0 %`'" S3 N lu Z g O m M �LLJ • ! CD @ •'��� Jf N 5 g�f) w ° 00 S�=E �� 6�° n@� o� S O� w� z U m U O I N �� m°> �j o QN N g° :act 3 Q M r moo° 9�C0 I -E o� -<f; O W — � p7 r eo E 03�� ° o A a N � °�;,. Z�$ z > S/ Q\_ O / f z �30 o>jo 3°s ma T s'Sc N c .0 m :v.1 '0 CO O O g � \`—� m MN U @ N °@ °o vs 3s fr. .o �y � Z d ?l L_J N N17 c ; N 3 E C9 O w D) p �O �pp� �a�w �ti =6 c� 412 ; N& ioiSFS �� L CD (n i) -6� C7 -0 a F Q O ({� CO Z a°i c E'6.9 �s N p y° 5° W rs pz W CD~ Z Ou� map < sa2 GK pot CO V� rido LL- z5ag -tisr Jl U II ° ° m E w 3 ��€°obg o °� a"}.i 0W €oo'" jQZ ) a o�6 ~ ZSFa�yy!• �N O o-k ;z Wnl� i't^PY .f oO W _ @ Z_ �it �i�) (() Q a IL- a s-� U' 3 U' U' i U o, N o 3 U z °, Cz I - CON 0 Z g° o o� r`40 ~ O O NNNNN �' OI" O�-- ^ E _ _LIJ Q II _Z �V l0(�oNmN- W OO Z z z G�\tEC O ono w� �N-mi (!)U �— ~ W Q�_w � (�N N P 7 01 oo ——0 0 0 O O O W p z W W 6) O N N ic�i"iiw. ✓, ro �o Q z o z W W OL N O zl' �-o O 8 o°< z l(( s N go 2,OpoC LQ — �v a g'1 iP o �G� O \ W L rfl W I— g I Q Z `t wJ �6 _ °'�-' N m j C Q °off °� �Jl� �� G vZ W_U�g �� N c W — Q1Q o �- W Z O Q z `°6 Q > oC J „= o W >>>>>>>�. Q z IV c 3 p Oz QQ z Z W N O < Lu N L' M N �. � Q c J_ V J Z LLJ w:�Q Cr-ILo Q = a a = cn @ cv m = = L m m m _� o o O aU N u� p z = y L L [O L p O w _ r O } Q U U m U z O p oc m p a>L O= Z W z W O w w O w w LL a g - z uj 0 '� ¢ lz u w ¢ L a o D U.jo CL mQ o ¢ a p a U F2 Q u) a p = a = a J J Fe C Lin _ 4' hay u QO C� --- a) o \ "OV w ° /'x x y-1- O ■ x v/yv�v` ■ livo �— /� ■ Q7 00 a LL CD O ?� UO L� � '1 + ( i 00 00 x ' U + O+ O �x + E\ _00 r �- S i o�' � 71- \\ Q= O 00 � W°' (0 OC �� o c, _� O.- E o w o LL_1 O O --N N N Cn cd LLJ Z =z = QN N N N N N N O O Ua _J 4�La� LU Q Q O O N O Q)N U Q Z LLJ Juwo LU . O 6Jz O O z QOU LU Q 0 0 o Z 00 o Oz�L LLJ �ULn i ^ L=LJ f)L—n N� c7 Rr os N o01 Lb O$Oa Q d oz Q NQ }' LLJIL/ =m J (s)LU Q z �� E E \�y� c,'�P NO m U —112 o G � - N (� Ln O I\ o <Y LLJ O Q w ca R z�3 LLJ > > >>>>> z 2 L z > �J a/ w w w w w w W a Q Z m r O XX c O 02 L IY oC U IY oL o: [i:y Q L Q ca 3 z Q og�> i o �I n c W fit'. II II II N �yul t j W h U a W s :i-- �9 g " • �� u Ey3 s p co s�E LU E. rE-- wo U V Uuo-oim �E�i W -,E)Ki oo tv�°a zEFFm� Lip of oC m a�Fs�O ., "s LL W u>N �,rt c E ¢+ }cp, �i p,E a:._. rtE E UV' Y c U E¢0 J Q ^~y E a R E o°$ E E E o'^ a'+ '�'E E,`!c ai °1 J lD E p LLJ Ey n p E ° c ° M N E E° •€ c E Q N 8 N .S N c �ryp _�U f E Q n'y� J_ `�c'a U - o u C m s U p N '[ o F E p m E° E x E; y c 0. O z,p.°�r ° E LD U - a'++ 'EE 3�� w , O° �� zE�QE c v_ � o �sgv5 � � o v v � o Ep �c"a6 emu° _m ° ra'o E N t 3» v >m E t 3 E _ > d' E Y N a y ^ L V^' F a�.t E 5 d C� OU ° o o E s^t`u°"� m^ S 3 ° N c c a`s E a a n g 3 N F g M Cg M o yy V z = m m a U 7 H i 9 N S r r 9 oU `von moo ° u uypmn u -ov o �� v u5 v t��E N c� L, p, U O J N y�E E dd _ F=v U n u oUj N E'c § 00 yyfffi _ U 'w Y� N 4� N 'z y v @ n t O _ ryEry O al '� t U _ N U K OO+ o� nc q� 4 M� M s.Q.. tN� fi E W N s�N N N z"6+U U O E U� 3 O E g E Qf+u LD 9 x E U7 i� K a� N- oC 3 u3i F E (] U mm Y V 3 1p O M M Q �p p _Z (il d K V' O O L i FF°>. cNm7 U u�'i N ° a E- cV E4Q.p E E E.o a°5 K ' v _3`m v °2 w' K _S E �Z 3_0 wry^oi3 is to �z�^C� z�'�9 S,�j v J~ O E t-N> N E U >,+ ^m c n °^ �.v.z Q O E i Z C\jO nN z � 2u+ �_ NOmE3 F' my E+s-' om sE o J W I^ N V n N O U O Z E 9.'U!� Z i UI E 3 N N N N T N c d y crow lu.o-,b�'- <_j a� zp�� 3 y� SSE pE nn n �u v� pEp z v a v u W U O° y u R y N C U U a=+E,U-e u 0 U t+? 0 U R N S N 6� N flnn_ t U U pv �o1g>u iY>O E N Oz 3 N 0 U m 0 V E�s s 3 O p y m„ c < Lo �m o.n S o a a 0 V NUd � N N z O O a z a:a J J 09 ww ' W a1 Eo V' m �m o zz O V Wh '1H.0-9 zQ O 6ii �10 CnD v mrG O Q F�F II II 35 m ZE U t °2d I ° O QE-, J J Ol cq W z. On_ ��o�C W W N N m5z I 3� z o.2 N o _s w � _�2 uw r ..z o Y§� j j N i z z 0 3 m W r o '0 = �O o: Wn 1 0 oF 1 '1H z 3 r mzti I $N r ° 0 r =� r m= w°M r r �QoQ r o r a� r z r � r U r 0 rr z 4a `� a r ZO �p r 'IL. zU r U U U �j 'WN'1H.46 = E a m N 'ktlW'1H.bf / m F _ I =Nr �mw� s 0 > O 0�03 � 0 rx�W F a U,�� a Ov a F g o? p0 O WA C6 E-W z _� z a wU�O _ O�04 U II w 0 U y z AY mo zCGaU m W Sri u.w z.. a wU�O OW + " 0 wU �v� E T)(!) zw��0 O z� o� F U orger 1 159. 163. w w NFL. Q Q 164.36. o -7 64 02 ��.. 1a 6 167.12w T 16 TW17004 z � BW167. 8 I ck Ret. Wall BW16 Gate HighMetal p 170--------------- .22 60:32 �� g Inground Pool DeckTub ote 03 170.41 in 170.1 G 4' High Metal Fence 170.2 »o 9 Drain . 170.72 s a\�� 171.11 Stone Ma .52 � 179.08 �� Ret. Wall 171.87 Wood Deck .172.78 Flag Patio Und. •67 173.99 Q Q y Z 22—Story -Sty 17�0 w II V II 1111 O— m w Frame " (n = O z w- II °� r �� Dwelling zJ > > >Q 3 U Q Q w w U 3 w U a_N uw LD W LJ)U) C) 0 H se.No.18 GcraQq 'U O LU V p Q Q � < LLI OO'D �U w_ 0Ub o Q�w �� U zZZLL /`�•x � tLr) N OC YQU LL �oLO Z N = ' o _ cli h ¢3z Nug —i vJE z w 3 LU z Z�J Off( 3 Q W LY J Q In Q L Q N � 33 Q LL Q Q > Or-L A 3 40 \ NNNI ¢ 0°3ct �' ►W—+ j � v� � � rn 7s a o , .> ,gym °Y v a� O \N, N N 06 N �p Y o •Qti1; �o U vm� X�u'i oyo _ o \\ \\ ZOO»? Q M® NN_ X mM° oU,, _ cUV \\ \\ U�ZZZ a II Uj X \ \ \ NX N-. M 0 Q 0\ oae �Y XuM� U Cl) U \\ �` U \ NV aV �Y X ° �X �o o v �� �� \ \`\ a tea; 6 (n0 MU c ! \ f�dfL(yy� M al U lV \ Y' .•+R' X �Y a d�a:. t-i.......... .....a...... .. o `. JC m u O \ 'UN° 0,p o NmO: U NU O \ Z -t1 M 0 V)X� o Quo �' 0/°: x `" LLJ C\iW 9 o o �a ,i \ :r Z ��o° vXm Y /� qr c/ x J ,\ X U o / 4J1J=. Q w LAJ N� / W \ > x / } �3 r� o ^N4 a u 0 o N in a '7 N to \ U.)N bq /to P W 1 o Cldm O o i• Q � co\% O �", • , o � •r.'�I /11 Q U �a/ UQ� o �' x Ld 0 zaDog 01N 3 1�,Li vi N - 0� •cw 1^ QI M k0�t TL N r. v J •r� �� „O", N 98n3 dO6O L �_ a• �, RGp+ „o.M*•7 W X w V7 co' r +OZ SO�Oa or) m w z�o w o G� ZZ !' cn O mL V>:) 0 �U (Ly�<cm>--+ ;0 1 I fV SIN3W00 Sd33NION3 NMOi hl3d SV(33SIA38 MWO 6 L-SM60#'011'9'd SAN -mvidino3 100d 031VOO-ON ZZIMLO 9 OlHosin'S N3HdOISINHO rzol/�(N*OOJF,91fv.10-1&010 HON38131GV3AMadV41 a3aGV =60/90 Z lo-loly 01-110IJ-111111,911 9090,1.4N sUlblal 0114M Nl"(183ONn G3GOV:aNGd 03SIA3U ZVZO/90 9 d. 30NDCIS3�1 SNHVH IMP-9--1,YVO11017119MOO .1.91PMW.101S, 011S 93311n0 0300V CNOd 03SIA3a MGM 9 GNOd 03SI/su �Zffllzo 0 U61SOO 5UIJ@9Ul6u3 I!Alo U- I 222d da.3.S A U MUM,C 0 R N mnno z LWM LA N�,�_ :A '3'd'0 1 H Osin'S�J3HdOiSl�:JHO F- N1.N.. . 3 330 100d CINV 100d C13SIA3U OMM MN A 0 .LN3110 N3d)l NVId 31lS < a w SNOISIABN z 2 opm a(D 0. 'E' Lil I�'D 0)0) f o -6 a) U) b-Aw c CL 2- LD C) 2 2�o m a .__ E 0 E U, V)04 0 0 )ZI .g 5 a > a F-- ow BE _0 z Iii Lo -§ ,, �� F—C c 0 1E 'ffi��.o -a.0 La 0.to a.0 -5 a .5; a) 0 co wc 0 E w.16 co 2 _0 0 0-, E-o 0) P. m'9'2 >0? ag 00 0 g 0 Cc 7E .0 cc 2 a� z 0) E M 1 0 P� >-E-AD E-m- N m 0 0.-E 6 4) a: E wvw .1 - 5�`B- '06 E' -SE I i 0 oa � 0 8 0. !g E M!F ;�(o Mc z "E E —4) w 12 0 >c 0-2 0- 0 1 o 2COa , -L..,o om :e N .z 0 a m;5 C 0 MD r g > 0 c .12 0 W,2, 0, E —m 00 t5 Lo 0 M 8 0. U 0.- 0 0 E L'OE =0 -20 w a 2 m x LL t5 a; (D w E) 2m 2 o m C 0 -2�E E w g 2 -.E 0 2-9 f E 2 E 5;,� m ?2 tm'a Z�3 8 c 0 C', c .0 2 c E 2 0:5,oc m 2 16 4) 2) :5. i M - 0 m 0 M.2 E=--T,> m 8 Z(,- 4) m '-m E E m -.2 -0' 0 La r < 3:u CD m -8 0.0- c I�. , - 0 12 -b- >C (D'o E 0 E' D .1. z c z 16 2.6 6 6 g 2 5 2) 0 T 0�5 a x c 0 .0 1 2 0 2 2 z 0 w 0 5 0 D CO. <LU m LU<< 8 —, X<c a - .1. �,12 2 .2 2 E U) GG 8 To w E 2 P f w 2 > N 5 > CV LU CV cli 4 L6 z m o as ------ S2 w C) cl < wLL CO 0 x 0 w LLI LLJ @ 0 0 Q W� w 00 w 0 I w zW. Z-E.E:w 0 �w w z Jr 8 w > W- Z d�,(D = < � 5< <a w z z > C) '.z, 0 M oR 0 z w 0 4" ,w > N w 0 a. Gz il. w w 0. P r\- UnD 3NOiS 0, 0 0 H 1� O� to xj t;0 1< 0 88no 3mols z z -z < w 0 um o L oz 3:CC) 0 L z 00000'] z u 11 I p— F- 1.)-W �<. 'o , z 0 O�x 0 0- 0 0 e Eloo -.�\ T w, El❑DO w z o< 000 0Na. .0 ❑ O� w C)<C):3 w 0. CN �o 0 DOD -8 X W 0 0 DOODDE V) LL x cHFH-]H�HQOElllElllO 00 W 0 \J� F- xe 0 < 00 CL 0 -�,6 2 0 Z I —w t; o AS ---t Q:: I Lq 0 f 0§0 w �.o o w w z w z C) A W z -jO X 01 0 0 1. Id w Q 0 WD me 0., w-W zo —————— — ltm zw < o ZE, 0 W w I -7 ll Z? Ln bf, LAJ o (L < C!2 ci cj 4 N, 0 Z 2 Vk > 2 w LL 0, a. x UJ < z C) o 3 2 V 03 m.0 w z D zi a. z 8 M 0 K o cn(n Ln (L a 3 N c)'t > CL LU E C14 04 NLLI 10 Z M !p t�l C-4 CV CT4 < m 2 A L-M060#'Oil'B'd SAN (N 011-Iosin's 83HdOISIZ:IHO ;4/*00Jg,9-fy.10.9&-11hj 9090/4N 94MIal c911I11tf CD C-4 P-101y 19/61,01YRNA(bl/ 01741R,1VI1d1-',Y.99 z m 30N3 aIS321 S>WVV4 0 U61SO(I 6UIJGGUI6U3 j!A10 < U. 0 U) z SIN3AVIOO'd33NIDN3 NMOI 89d SV 03SI108 ZZISZILO z < imoci mdniOmug iOHINOO -3-d"OlHosin'S 213H,dOiSNHO N Lu z ONVIlVI3(]HON3'di3lgV3V483dV410300V ZZ/60/90 S1IVi3G Nouom:jISN00 m 0 En a co SNOISIA36 - w 0 Z, z -Z ±w z 0 E .w aaaw W- opap E E E w E:) m E vpo C? 260 ac (6 -M b:D 0 ,dU 'd 0 w 0 < z c z i 0 V) z Z P 5. < < 5 8 199 Ld M z LLI V) z 0 RR P Hil W r3 V) N z is 0 5 W t:p P: it pai gm 0 - qqq -z D ig zw Ig. LLI Sm M�2 NN z om C) < 0 k> 0 0!� z 0 m W us < r m z ,Lw R 00 H w . 0 R Fr�3 M z. z Ld c4 �i 4 1 m 1� m6 < or 0 z Z, >!a. z W �m a<ZM _10 Z, 0 p: Zo- K 0. 'NM M z cz,Z Z.0 10 % — W , I.Ij ***1 u w z w 0 V) x Gi w a- 0 L4 0 z s z r _j z _j< V) < Ld o U)iL a0 w-s u < LLI ai (A N«i (A 0 w < CL nWJ> 2 0 Q U3,: W < D 0 L)3wz ca < W :2 00 L) w < KW < M w L) < z j g 16 =z3 Vq 0 z LU T5 yw cn V)18 Iz-4 V) Nz z z HPF HIM L)z all is NO c4 i -i C, N _ ��y aa z f_)z w a, z g man z �I L) r ImIg LAJ >: z c a_ g-o L) p 0 R LCL ? z r. 2m z cn 6 g P I 0 I z < v a Q ��� ul z c.4 m g 1 10 US zi w 2 z 1,-9U060#'Oil'3'd SAN OIHosin'S U31-fdOlS121H0 %1/*Oalg 19-(,V,10 a6e ��� Pub'a/ePUe/%H8< g0906,(N sur%1 al1yiLl anuanyyde�ygg 30N341SMI S>IHVV4 fuaruBeuw-wo/u/suo0 - -/,g/e.Nuu%g -ows o N u6isad 6uijeeu16u3 11n10 c LL NV Id SISA IVNV 3dO1S *3'd OlHosin'S 213HdOlSNHO W W z SNOISIA38 o o `"r x zo "x e rn z q o_�7 Q Z 0 6 � f� Q a o 0 0 0 H ( O '7 O G Cl) 0 00 r N o w Q m o rn rn 0 Q Z W W LO In Lf) N <7 J W o o FQ z 0 0 O N ~ w a 0 rn CD 91 z Q 0 0 =i o z a o 1p i M 8t.09.98N ~(J aww Ewa w yo, t° ia� w O cam zz1 o� u~i� 3 nffi F1enc`' m>m a>a� �zw°out NQw J c F > ��' \ ��„ SF• /°'���0 as �Fn f 9 85Z % -_ •N 11 O //o m 0.- z I/ U uNi Mm 3,101S N/ a° a oQ J ~a / Oz Z BtlflO 3NO1S zK U �OOO z Y NO wo ❑❑❑ S `+y E100 POP: zo wmZ LD I Ow OFF y �p(w/1 N� ¢ 1 I 1 Na U 0.4 a ao x N / 00 w u N Z W m ODD VOODOO o ODD 00000000 3y �x%xX\ \-oz ¢v Ow�a� x x�x\ \ ` p0 w O Id aW0 ♦x,, or \ ww \ II /x Amy �1 p N z o 5F cwi O Z / W w / - o x x W z + +i e / \ / <1 /F z, c0Q �' ' 1, o Ewos I rn �aJ ~ / o" // w Ro / w� N W 6 P r -7\ IL A / 'kt ✓jr co' .y 6. i " 0 L-86 L060#'011'3'd SAN 0IHOSIn'S N3HdOIS18HO el p< N*0W9 OIYJO a6e//� 9090<�(N suie�d a�iyy� oeo�y a�eoue��yg� anuanyydeNgg N 30N3aIS321 SN2IVIN �uacu6euebyuoi��n�rsuo� - �a�e.Nuvo�g -aig o N u61S90 6u1j99u16u3 j!A1O N T, o ddW S`d�2�`d�J`dNl`v'�Ja '3'd`DIHoSlfl'S 213HdOlSI�IHO ¢ W W Z U Q = o SNOISIn3N U) I U-1 N H ' N d N � J G z D m wgQ "t LL Q(1) W Cy O c Z Q MLL J Q� �¢ QQCn o o 1 i W m 0 0 w w Q �r; w LL N Lx 6 M„BZ.Og,98N O~ �U❑ ¢ a II 0i LL wo QM / 1� wO awz, to ww o U>a ❑Q uww i� 8 Z oo Or= Now \ O�> W >IIZ w QRr'za 0' 6� w U a�v FZ z�w 0>0 3 J a s o O w = Z Ell a - ww -- 0� \ � O a Oa \ F� oo a I ` Z U � r Billy 3N015/ Z tp O CL om(D `R\\ 'N LL 04 W�\ ' Lu OO ❑❑❑ E02N Q <- I Q j U w a w g N t0 O 0. a / ❑❑❑❑ LC j / I, 1 N 3. ELI o a ❑❑❑ W O Q M L \ a " O / a, •' I 00 wW \ I a000 \' OO N Q i i�io p N an d \ 0 U ❑❑❑❑o[❑❑011 oo°❑ V) LL \� w /xw \ = O 0w (V / O Ow Iw"tn U / v �m� w m a / sai,w y � 1 /0 1 ro �aF J mo O= I � Ioo _yo Jw o a oa ~ ----- —g / Q w N V w 'wo N m '•��, / m/ I I � I � LL I/a I11S� V z g J Q O h 00 d / co i / •. > ® A . �s N O � j E o T...• O /r� 6, srxs+p s - ,(11t111�f nInLL�����"JJJJiiii 0 I(1z O ILIi II CO L1 J }.:3 "f`�3�� �e+:. C.r w ^" � � �u L'� 0•Cw� b 00 r }. I z t is m !• 00 /�uj w W iL�T}yy Z N L_ U_ Y .>:sir c~ k � r� mLLJ oc3 Z r.y' s pp f J O tea }4 f � a``�"" [1 s 1,.�.•d 1 n.Nx F "� J MJ x'{'-ate• .'ss t R,.o Fy 1 - CO Q �> W y c 8 cc Z z�1 N O000 O In •� �o ��� �i� (n r: t. s t} 4 t (�` 6 0 �O _ n x. �..� 3 Y ? z w a gg�Yi z `� CPx ah O (14 a.. yr yr,: ppq O Cs J Q , 1. 7 �� LO b'�S C� O G :. g... .. r ` O Z�09 Q LLI -0 � � M18 � � � o �- 1 0 �o U s O in CL to N\ --_ O u J O D CD CL to to t- oq ° O Nd �Y oo ?C v e C� � C) 0 e fl r O U urb °ne s o. CD c one 0 0•�n°D' o t° a L Dr��e a ra o 0 C 0 6 o C9 rn ({� `r Cl m u� N i N d to 0W �• °; oo r N n -d MQGad °ne a otc O r, a J o O �O N Z to t'Lo S� O r' m g s 000 �'� as O 1) 1 �. p q! p� N r M o �r 41 1-1 to si a► Zst �� N T d \� 10 S, Ste. !. � O p tJ Go O/et`- .\ �1. ��� O'r O U V �i j > \ Syr 19 tn�N e��p 0 U� ' N I ` Q 00 z 0i9! O� �! N r o p \`\I o i = � tj a \ c6 Cis'6+ U rn'"O p_ n i °o CD `\�O `\ d (_ �� ✓ 6'S� G A 0'. N D O GO a�\ to 1 r co O � O� \ � to �` e 6'�d �`I C`� F` /O�S w./ z d' \` , ~ r ! � \` t0 O\ r " rS w 0 LS N 0 ��\ 9�, �� �,�5 'o00 0 r7 1411 `\ 6.6 00 N Uo- Z \`\. Oi ` ! • - rt ---F-- - C14 -------- o - --- Q 3 ------ a co �(1) O 0) Lq co o - 0, 1 _cor-- r` n o o cn II � ��° \`_o -Cri �� ton, o i/ 0 r-I LIT.T•• CO 00 1 0) M r I O \\�O\ ��.J X i N I LP 100 I cofl >n \\.�� rl \2I O ` x Lt J to rn to 00 O r +J C) a o �7 v ccq 0 i O Q 1 to i N I to N V' o \ co (0 V d ao U j � t[.J oLO U ico�' .... rn _0 o O O N C: C' o ^ M \\� m O co m \ M C,U O z � � °@ O �- C1 0 ^ N >,��- a 0 Q/z Q) �� co @ 1 a r �L J/ p \ oe O 0 O CL'C) O C:) �o CV ��rb�� /�°� � °®\ _ IV�E a� N �c�s c� a II > a O O_`�M � 1 0 M > a -'-4� N /v lj Oo !'c s3 N !- >, O O cn U L ^ ^ o et^ > ov m `=�, a �" ° a A ro`O cn N O_� > X N 0-C C)O O U O O .,rO O b� N a +,0.>O O z ►— 0 N °�I I o o I I �� 0 LLl O O(n o O OL O ON 0 �- I `_ 0 C� w O_ o O I O m U M N cr y0@@ cn o>`a�� U o >,�; °N° 0 d to�r°,u� ,r°M00 1 Q v U) �� o� a� �`'- � U W U d-�`-c�i ao 0 0 0d °d0 0 / �l cn >, -0 o O� v a� z O II ao Lri M 00 a) �,L p Q I I Ln N O j�'-a m aL a� C a II N N�I r l�5 �6'' 0 0- 0000 �� N II?� II 0 II z N II s J� -° NU) m° � U uj _ Q 0�� C71 - 0 N N U -J A LL-Q U O C..) O 0- O 4- Q 0 O i i ~ O OO= > > F-I—(n N> O C) m Q cn U) N