Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBP21-062PERMIT # 461 SECTION TYPE OF WORK JOB LOCATIOrJ OWNER, CONTRACTOR_ EST. COST ✓Co # o� TCO # FOOTING FOUNDATION FRAMING RGI-i FRAMING INSULATION PLUMBING RGH PLUMBING r AS SI"'RINbCLER EL. M;C I RtC LOW -VOLT d:LARM AE BUILT FINAL 1- Olo� DATE:_ L �/ EXP: ,75 BLOCK j LOT,_,_,,,, INSPECTIO`N- R�ECO�R 1DVATf �l LJ�1 U r (7.-44 a.scel ey 74aJ /✓ewAar a•,dn,j —�MPs �4rre/l �9Jy)1o93-'700�,1 �a5= Ab rJollql / P 03IiER APP OVALS ARF3 o ecA / 7 QcX-) I 130T AS-l3UILTIFiNAL SURVEY IaE4UIRED PRIOR TO FINS L INSPECTION We all have the site plan, John, so you just have to reference where you're at. Don Moscato that will probably help the most, right, because if you look at how the lot sits. the street, that's the driveway side so those are the pictures. So, I guess if I blow up the site plan, out. I think I have a better picture of it on the other side, those are the neighbor's houses. Across stairway coming out of here and we would want to turn the direction of it, so that it comes straight And then we were changing the doors, the stairway coming out off the kitchen. Right now, there's a covered some uncovered and then have our stairway go to this redone patio piece with the firepit. the old part of the deck and then we wanted to build a new deck beyond it. So, there's some But we're going to put a roof over this like bump L shaped part of the house. We're going to roof is the area we want to do the work. So, right now this existing deck is basically staying the way it is. see, there's all woods behind it. The lot is also like a triangular shape, if you're looking at it. So, this Okay, I'll start with the photos. Okay, so this is the house. It backs up to the school and as you can John Scarlato new rear landing. Okay, John, you want to begin?Rocking Horse Trail, constructing rear deck expansion, new deck roof, new rear, masonry patio and Okay, the first application is item number 21-002. Michael Susserman & Caren Susserman 23 Don Moscato and new rear landing. Construct a rear deck expansion, new deck roof, new rear masonry patio 23 Rocking Horse Trail Michael Suesserman & Caren Suesserman 1.1. #21-002 song and dance part of that. evening. You know the drill since John, you're on both of them, so we don't have to go through the Mickey Izzo and video is being brought to you by Fred Seifert. We have two applications this complement of the Board with us. We have Village council Drew Gamils, Building Inspector Welcome to the March 2, 2021 meeting of the Rye Brook Zoning Board of Appeals. We have a full Don Moscato -2 - https://otter.ai Transcribed by John, why do you need the extra part of the deck? What is the logic behind that? Don Moscato nonconformity of the stairway onto the patio can violate on grade the setback. and back to the other deck. And we inbuilt the stairway to come down to try to minimize the Okay, now I feel better. Okay. So that's what we're proposing is to just do the open deck, straight John Scarlato Wait until John recovers there. I anticipated that so. Don Moscato and the stairway cut into the deck coming down to the patio, the patio doesn't need a variance. towards the backyard and towards the patio and then we're proposing this new addition to the deck redoing the platform but instead of having the stairs come out towards the garage as the stairs go better solution to this house than trying to do something that conforms. So, we are proposing peculiar shape. So, that's how we came up with what we're doing because we really feel this is a baseball field, and then the school way in the distance and it's all landscape and the lot is this of the house for looks and for privacy that it is on the back considering we're backing up to the house from the road makes any sense because it's really more of an issue having a deck on the side look at the road. And we don't think coming down the street and seeing the deck stick off the don't want the deck sticking off the side of the house because we don't want to sit on the deck and and going behind the house. We have plenty of building envelope on the side of the house. But we three and a half foot variance to be able to do this and have the deck and the stairway coming off the patio. So, it's our stairway. That's our worst case at 26 feet. So, we're looking for a three foot conforming. But we want to extend this open deck into this triangle and our stairs coming down to we're extending, we're putting the roof over the porch, which doesn't need a variance that's we're proposing doing. We're going to redo this deck and stairway coming off the kitchen. And you go out, that's where you want to go not towards the driveway. So, these are the two things that patio in the back, it makes more sense to come out to the side door and go straight. Because when stairway doesn't really work with the hill, because you come down kind of on the hill. And with the And right now, this stairway runs along in the house, but the way the yard is with the hill, the pretty much conforms. But because it's a triangle, when we go across the back, this part violates it. existing deck kind of forms into it. So, we're adding out here in the back. So, this edge of the deck zoning variance when the house was built, and it has a variance for the offsets of the house. Our when it was built. The portico, the house is pretty much on his front yard setback, the portico had a So, as you can see the lots really a triangle and this house had a five foot front and rear yard setback John Scarlato -3 - https://otter.ai Transcribed by going to change. even for the setback aren't that bad and we're backing up to the huge amount of property, that's not us and we have so much land behind us. I think the setback issue is minor and I'll say the numbers the house and hug it to one side. So, I just feel like on this site because we've got the school behind the school behind you. It made more sense to have more space between the houses and try to take they were given a variance to center the house more on the lot because I think everybody felt with way to the right. And really hugged the property line and made the house more conforming. But the lot because I think even when they built the house, they could have brought the house all the this considering how you see how the house is angled. And the way they centered the house into addition to the school that we're looking at through the trees. So, it just makes logical sense to do backing up to the school, she's backed up to the baseball field. And in the distance, she has a huge should be tucked behind the house, and the patio tucked behind the house. And, you know, we're So, the point of putting a deck where we're allowed to do it on this house makes no sense the deck your deck, you're out in your front yard, because you're off on the curve here. So, it's like you see it. the neighborhood would want a deck on the side of the house because then you're hanging out on Horse Trail and being between the houses and somebody using the deck, but we really don't think could do totally as of right and not be here. But I think neighborhood wise coming down Rocking answer your question in this portion we could do a huge deck off the side of the house. Which we could add a much bigger deck out the side of the house, which we really don't want to do. So, to behind your house, not out on the side of it. So, we wouldn't be here if we wanted to add. And we mean, the owner really, and I agree with her, if you're hanging out on the deck, you really want to be area of the deck. And the point of having the open deck as of right out the side of the house. I closed part of it's like 15 by 15. So, we're not like asking for huge deck, we're well under as far as the out another 12 feet. So, it's not like we're doing a huge deck. The open part is like 12 by 15. And the point is, we want part of it closed, we want a reasonable deck and the deck we're doing only came No, because I mean, if we didn't add to the deck, we wouldn't be having an issue. But the whole John Scarlato John, if it didn't have the open section, how would that affect the permit request? Joel Simon have to go downstairs to be out in the sun. And when you entertain it just kind of made more sense. open on the main level and then go down to the patio, we didn't just want to have covered and then because we have a decent amount of stairs down to the patio, we really wanted to have covered and part of the house. So, we have part of it covered. And then having part of it uncovered. And covered. And we wanted to have part of it open. So, the logical solution is to put the roof in the L Well because with COVID, and more people being outside, we really wanted to have part of it John Scarlato -4 - https://otter.ai Transcribed by patio and the deck under the 400 as opposed to trying to make two projects out of it separated, a do surface water for a small patio and a deck. But we're not playing games, we actually have the done a much bigger deck. But we stayed under the 400 because it just makes sense not to have to couple of years come back for a patio and then it would have been a new 300. And we could have patio. We could have done a much bigger deck and just forego the patio for now. And then in a I mean, the answer to that is, if we wanted to make the deck bigger, I would have had to redo the John Scarlato number. Can you weigh in on that? Or maybe can Mickey weigh in on that? certain that we're not aggravating any water drainage issues by just keeping it under that threshold having to have a water management plan submitted. So, I just want to be comfortable and be Yeah, because whenever I see that 400 number, I always think of, you’re two and a half feet short of Don Moscato made the deck I feel the practical size that it should be. bigger if that's what you're asking for and still been under the 400 square feet. But we didn't, we deck to hang out on with the covered porch. So, we could have reduced the patio to make the deck answer is, we made the deck the size it, I really want to say the minimal size to make it a reasonable did keep the deck small because of the variance or I want to say reasonable for the variance. So, the we really, the deck is the size it is because it makes sense for what we're trying to do. And we really of the deck that was there and went 12 feet because we felt 12 feet was fine for the open area. So, the back, the bigger variance I needed. And then B, we went in with a deck that matched the length push it bigger, for two reasons, I didn't push it bigger because A, every foot I pushed it further out making the deck 12 feet deep, because that's what makes logical sense in a normal deck. We didn't change. So, if we wanted to make the deck bigger, we would add from the patio. So, we're really No, you got to realize what the 400 square foot threshold is, it’s a deck and the patio, the whole John Scarlato it bigger if you didn't hit that 400 square foot threshold? So, did that dictate your demand for a variance, the size of that variance? Or would you have made Don Moscato Correct. John Scarlato want to keep it under the 400. John, I have a chicken or the egg question. You're disturbing 397.5 square feet. So, you definitely Don Moscato -5 - https://otter.ai Transcribed by I think that's a key point. So that deck that we're talking about that's there now in the rear was not the subject of the variance. Michael Izzo So, it was because, if we go back to the survey, it was that stairway in the portico. And. John Scarlato Okay. Michael Izzo stairway that was there, I believe, because the deck on the other side of the house conformed. It is getting bigger, variances in 2008. I believe it was this stairway which was reworking the same John Scarlato through variance as the years go by, that's what we're trying to establish. part of the of the 2008 variance. What I'm trying to establish or not is, is this deck getting bigger I guess my question is, what was the thrust of the variance pertaining to the deck because that was Michael Izzo be fixed. pretty much the same stairway done exactly the way it was. We just rebuilt it new because it had to comes the same way. Because when they bought the house, we were on a budget. So, the stairway is footprint it was the front part and on the back, we just rebuilt the stairways back in, which is why it the house was brick, it was brick not stone. So, we replaced it with the hip roof portico in the same originally had a railing. A wrought iron railing and I think it might have two square columns. And basically rebuilt the deck coming off the kitchen, and we rebuilt the portico. We did the portico it We basically rebuilt it the way it was, I'm trying to figure out how to get a picture of that. So, we 2008. The house was pretty much 1960s original and the stairway coming off the kitchen we rebuilt. 2008, I guess we go back to the photos. You can see it was actually, when they bought the house in John Scarlato the size of that deck that was built in 2008? Hey, John, the variance that was granted in 2008 for the front portico and the rear deck. What was Michael Izzo that's done and should be done. Like there should be no more changes to it. year or two apart and then get to be at 398 and then come back at 350 in two years. So, this is a plan -6 - https://otter.ai Transcribed by I understand that. I just wanted to know what it was going to look like. Steve Berger variance. That's in the building envelope. It's going to be just the extension of the roof but realize, the extension of the roof needs no John Scarlato Their roof is just extension of the roof, there's not going to be any walls covering that right? Steve Berger Do other members of the board want to weigh in? Don Moscato Okay, thank you. Michael Izzo things that we didn't do earlier on. come out the kitchen door, going towards the driveway makes no sense. So, we're kind of fixing, now, they've lived there a long while now. So now they know how the house works. And when you they didn't really know the lay of the land and how they were going to really like. She's lived there still getting a variance on because we're turning. In 2008, they haven't really lived in the house. So, We didn't get a variance on the larger deck in day one, we got it on this smaller one, which we're John Scarlato Okay, but it's not the larger deck. Michael Izzo any other deck bigger. It is the triangle of the deck that's violating the setback, stairway off the new deck, because now I'm adding this, this the upper deck now that I'm making And now we're just basically putting the stairway towards the patio. But my worst case is on the that way makes no sense. And when I come out this way, I'm still getting into my setback issue. violates. So now what we're doing is we're removing the stairway from here, because it coming out house. And that's where we got the variance for because this whole thing violates, and the portico that, well, in some aspect, right now you came out to this piece and the stairway runs along the doorway and I should probably make this a little bigger, we've actually made it slightly better on conformed. Our issue was, and actually, to be perfectly honest, right now, you come out this No, it wasn't that one. So, our 2 variances are like, can I get the easy one? Right. So, this deck John Scarlato -7 - https://otter.ai Transcribed by totally feel that if we put the deck where it's allowed to go. Because we didn't want to come for the triangular and then they cropped the house, because the road curves so it's a tough lot. But I do hill, they got the ball field here, you can see the sand. So, I don't think it's the big lot, but it's landscaped. So that's really what you're looking at and you really see the addition, which is up the So, I mean, this is what we're backing up to the school. So, there's really no neighbors and it's also John Scarlato Right. Jamie Schutzer that. Yeah, I have a good one where you really see the construction. Right there. Like that's you seeing John Scarlato Right now it’s a construction site. Don Moscato That’s the school and the field I've got good pictures of that. John Scarlato back, what's behind there is that the school, that’s a baseball field, Yeah, I looked at the picture of the house that would look kind of silly going that way. So, going Jamie Schutzer Correct. Because this building envelope, right, these dotted lines are building envelope. John Scarlato totally fine, right? John, just to be clear what you're saying on this bottom picture? If you went to the right, you'd be Jamie Schutzer Okay. Steve Berger It's just round and open. John Scarlato -8 - https://otter.ai Transcribed by I think that makes the house less attractive. what the house looks like. And I kind of agree with Jamie that putting the deck out to the side here, Well, I think we have to balance the zoning and the variance and the effect on the back, but also Steve Berger just wanted to point out that it is possible. some people that are more of a stickler than others in terms of the zoning. And may, you know, I I didn't say it wasn't and I didn't say it's preferable. I was just in the discussion. There might be Glenn Brettschneider walkway. I mean, it's much, I actually think it's more complicated to do that. You put it on the side. If you want to connect it the patio, the stairs are longer you got to put other But Glenn, yes, you could do that. But the purpose of the deck is also to connected it to the patio. Steve Berger the school with the big addition on it. the tight back yard. But I mean, we're up against so much open space. And I mean, she's looking at I would understand if we were up against the side yard setback at somebody, or we were up against John Scarlato Yeah, I don't disagree. Glenn Brettschneider them. have the deck behind the house, like, in the normal world. Normal houses have the deck behind I mean, it would take some time. I mean, yeah, but I think it's so much more comfortable to just John Scarlato And you could theoretically block off the extended deck. It's not an impossibility. some quick growing ones, if you wanted. So, you may be coming up the driveway or on the street. is, theoretically, you could extend the deck sideways and have trees, shrubbery, evergreens, there's Although, theoretically following up on Jamie, and I understand why you'd want the deck where it Glenn Brettschneider you see this deck sticking off the house. This makes absolutely no sense. variance. Having it stick out the side of the house. When you’re coming in a circular driveway when -9 - https://otter.ai Transcribed by and that's across the street. the right. This is her driveway coming in the circle. And then this is the house to the right. Okay, side there really isn't anything it goes to the school, which is on the triangle. And then the house to There's no neighbor. Oh, this is across the street. On other, the right side of the proximity? The left John Scarlato Now, John, what is the view from the neighbors on either side? Can you just comment on that? Don Moscato variance than it is to do it as of right. makes sense because it’s just a much better design and better for the neighborhood to get this neighborhood. So, we're here asking for a zoning variance, but we feel our hardship to do it really logical sense for the homeowner, the way the house is used. And for the way it looks in the But we chose the option to come and do something a little bit more difficult. That would make John Scarlato Right. Right. Glenn Brettschneider That can be done, yes. It's something that could be done and could be done. easily. Yes. John Scarlato that can be done. Yeah, as I said, my point wasn't that it's a very viable option. My point was that it is just something Glenn Brettschneider of the house? variance or anything. I’d be driving by the side of the house. I mean, like why is the deck on the side drive by with the deck on the back of houses is not even going to drive by and think they got a way they did it. As opposed to somebody driving by with the deck on the back of house, somebody wise it's as nice. And as I hate to say it, I would drive by the house and I’d be more annoyed at the through it, and you see people hanging out on the side deck. I mean I don't think neighborhood neighborhood and less user friendly. Because I just think if you kind of get in and you're seeing I also think it's, as far as the neighborhood, I just I think it makes it less, less blending into the John Scarlato - - https://otter.ai Transcribed by new patio. If that's a concern. we're really not, other than the patio, in the back. I mean, we always could put drywell in for the existing deck was. It was it was just redone. So, there doesn't seems to be a water issue there. And when we redid the portico was on top of the existing and the deck was in the spot where the Oh, can you hear me? Okay. I mean, in 2008, we really didn't change anything on the footprint, John Scarlato You just lost audio? Joel Simon That was my that was the reason for 400 square foot question. Don Moscato really know the answer to that one. work years ago, we never changed the footprint. So, there may be some dry wells in there. I don't Off the top of my head, I do not know exactly the drainage of the house because when we did the John Scarlato going to wind up. everything's draining away from the house. I'm just wondering where this added stormwater is sort of in a mound there. You know, the ball field is lower that streets a little bit lower. So, mean, a lot of it's running from the driveway into the street because you're up on the hill, but you're I mean, are these leaders to daylight, they go in into a pipe? Do you know, where all this existing I Michael Izzo Yeah, that's a good question off the top my head I do not know. John Scarlato property? Where does where does the roof water go? You know, where that goes? Say, John, yeah, could you speak for a moment about the site drainage, existing site drainage on this Michael Izzo is and what it will look like. So, whatever concerns I had initially, I'm not too concerned about granting the variance of where it I felt much more comfortable with the variance once I saw where it was and what was in the back. I had expressed concern about that creeping deck. Also, I went, and I looked at the site today. And Don Moscato - - https://otter.ai Transcribed by have Mike look at it right? And see what it needs right? for our increase because right now the house doesn't have an issue. So, we could always do it to school. So, I'm not foreseeing it being an issue. And we can always put a drywell in if we need to, this lot is kind of low anyway. So, all the work is in the backward slopes between them and the There are there are no water issues at the moment. I mean, I don't foresee us creating one because John Scarlato water issues whatsoever? Well, let me ask this. First off, John, are you aware at the moment, in the current condition of any Joel Simon this point? an adverse impact on the environmental conditions. Do any of the other board members issue at On the positive side, it will be to approve the variance as is with the expectation that it will not have application until we got that information. That seems to be two of the options on the negative side. if we felt that strongly enough about it, we could reject the application, or at least delay the where the existing water is going and where the incremental change is going to go. We could either, Okay. So, I guess as a board, our alternative would be if we felt that not having any information on Don Moscato speak of. No, sir, it doesn't reach that plateau. It's not at 400 square feet. There's no engineering to look at to Michael Izzo issue? Even if it's under 400? Now Mickey, does Michal Nowak get involved in this at all, at some point signing off on the water Don Moscato At the moment, we didn't propose to tie into anything now. John Scarlato assumption is that you're not going to tie into anything, Is that a correct assumption? bit more comfortable if I knew exactly where the water was being captured. Now, and my water was my initial concern, environmental conditions. And I would feel, personally, I'd feel a little Well, for all intents and purposes, the concern of that additional 397. And how it will impact the Don Moscato - - https://otter.ai Transcribed by determination. He may say there's nothing. He may say there's something to be done, but it'd be subject to his Joel Simon we need, whether we need something. Yeah, I would say that would make sense to have Michal review it and then decide whether, what John Scarlato Michal's review, yeah. Joel Simon Michal, Michal's review Yeah. Don Moscato Mickey's review of the site? Can we do it in a manner such as approved subject to stormwater management based upon Joel Simon that? asking for it to be put in now, initially, and any of the other board members want to comment on I don't know if we could or should approve with the open ended nature of that option rather than say that. In his opinion, there should be a dry well there, then then certainly that would be fine. But would feel more comfortable knowing that any water issues. Now if Mike were to go out there and Yeah, I would certainly feel comfortable with that. I’m conscious of any increased cost. But I still Don Moscato for the increase and the variance gets granted that's another option. So, Don, that would be the third option is that the applicant agrees to do a stormwater management Michael Izzo The increase yes. Not the whole site. John Scarlato square feet. Is that what you're saying? So, John, you'd be amenable to agreeing to put in stormwater management to capture the 397 Michael Izzo - - https://otter.ai Transcribed by comfortable with those five? Yes, yeah. Okay, good. All right, let me read the resolution. conditions subject to that condition. And five, the need for the variances self-created. Are we substantial. Four, the variance will not create any adverse impacts to the physical or environmental cannot be achieved through another method. We comfortable with that. Three, the variance is school being the primary visual person there or entity. Second, the benefit the applicant seeks variance will not create an adverse impact to the character of the neighborhood. There being the closed. Let me go through the factors and see if the board is comfortable with that. First step, the being None. Can I have a motion to close the public hearing? Okay, now the public hearing is Okay, is there anyone on the call wanting to speak in favor or against the application? And there Don Moscato No Don, we received no information in support or against the application. Michael Izzo department received any comment and or letters from any of the neighbors? Okay, everybody okay with that? Okay, let me just run through. Well, let me just ask, has the Don Moscato I'm fine. Glenn Brettschneider I'm okay with that. Steven Berger Okay, how about the other members? Does Steve, Jamie and Glenn? Don Moscato Yep. Joel Simon Are you comfortable with that? Joel? Don Moscato Yes, I would add it in as a condition. Drew Gamils Now, Drew, how would that show up in the resolution? As a condition? Don Moscato - - https://otter.ai Transcribed by 5) The need for the variances IS self-created. environmental conditions of the neighborhood; and 4) The variance WILL NOT create any adverse impacts to the physical or 3) The variances IS substantial; variance; method, feasible for the Applicant to pursue, that does not require the The benefit the Applicant seeks CANNOT be achieved through another 2)neighborhood; The variance WILL NOT create an adverse impact to the character of the 1)the Rye Brook Code, finds: concerned, and upon considering each of the factors set forth at Section 250-13(G)(b)\[2\]\[a\]- \[e\] of the Board, from the application, after viewing the premises and neighborhood WHEREAS, and Environmental Quality Review Act and accordingly, no further environmental review is required; the proposed action is a Type II action pursuant to the New York State WHEREAS, the public hearing was closed on March 2, 2021; and WHEREAS, those wishing to be heard were given such opportunity; and a duly advertised public hearing was held March 2, 2021, at which time all WHEREAS, pursuant to Village Code § 250-20.G(3); and yard setback variance of 10.1 feet where the minimum required rear yard setback variance is 40 feet on June 3, 2008 the Zoning Board of Appeals granted the Applicants a rear WHEREAS, and Parcel ID# 129.75-1-8;and designated on the tax map of the Village of Rye Brook as from the intersection of Dorchester Drive and Rocking Horse Trail. Said premises being known Trail, in an R-15 zoning district on the East side of Rocking Horse Trail, approximately 170 feet deck roof, new rear masonry patio & new rear landing on property located at 23 Rocking Horse on June 3, 2008 is 29.3 feet, in connection with the proposed Construct a rear deck expansion, new minimum required rear yard setback for this property as granted by the Zoning Board of Appeals for a rear yard setback of 3.3 feet variance where the Caren Suesserman (the “Applicants”)Michael Suesserman & , application has been made to the Zoning Board by WHEREAS RESOLUTION - - https://otter.ai Transcribed by Jamie? Don Moscato Yes. Glenn Brettschneider Glenn? Don Moscato Yes. Steve Berger Okay, we all comfortable with that. Good. Okay. All right, then. Let's take a vote. Steve? Don Moscato Superintendent of Public Works. proposed project shall be reviewed and may be required by Michal Nowak, Stormwater management for the increase in impervious surface from the 2) Drew Gamils And secondly, Drew, want to read that condition? Please. Don Moscato connection with the review of this application. paid in full all application and consultant fees incurred by the Village in No permit or certificate of occupancy shall be issued until the Applicant has 1) located at 23 Rocking Horse Trail, is hereby GRANTED on the following conditions: rear deck expansion, new deck roof, new rear masonry patio & new rear landing. on property Zoning Board of Appeals on June 3, 2008 is 29.3 feet, in connection with the proposed Construct a 3.3 feet variance where the minimum required rear yard setback for this property as granted by the that the said application for a rear yard setback of NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED - - https://otter.ai Transcribed by unless Board members have any questions. don't know if basically, it's a COVID related delay. We could move quickly on that as a Board for an extension of the approval of the zoning variance village code 250 dash 13 section H. John, I for an extension. Item number 19-014. Lawrence Rose, Lauren Rose 39 Meadowlark Road request Okay. The second application. Let me just reference it here. Okay, second application is a request Don Moscato I'm better now I don't know. choking on myself. John Scarlato Okay, as long as you have a glass of water, you'll be fine. Don Moscato As much as I want to run, I'm staying, John Scarlato Okay, very good. Perfect. Okay, now, John, don't go away. Don Moscato I'll talk to Mike tomorrow. John Scarlato possible. schedule that thing in a timely manner, that way you can proceed with the project as quickly as Don? Yes. Okay. Application approved five ayes, zero nos. Congratulations. And John, if you Don Moscato Yes. Joel Simon Joel? Don Moscato Yes. Jamie Schutzer - - https://otter.ai Transcribed by extension of the original variance approval for an additional six months if the applicant Zoning Board has authority pursuant to village code 250 dash 13 section H 2 in grant to grant an construction, given the current state of uncertainty with the Covid 19 pandemic. And whereas the requesting an extension of the variances, whereas the applicant seeks to delay the start of the Zoning Board is in receipt of a letter from John G. Scarlato Jr., dated February 4, 2021, the variances will expire on March 1, 2021, pursuant to village code 250 dash 13 section H, whereas successful. Let me just go through the particulars. I'll just go through the whereas clauses whereas somebody want to propose it. The move. Okay. Seconded. Okay. Motion to close public hearing speak in favor or against? Now there being none. Motion to close. Whatever public hearing we had wave or something we will be open to an extension if circumstances warranted. Anyone want to But yeah, we'll keep it at six. Okay, fine. You can always come back, John. And if we have a second Don Moscato But I don't think we're allowed to extend it that long. Steve Berger We look for a year considering the way the world is? It's not an issue. John Scarlato Six months. Okay. Is there anyone wanting to speak. Don Moscato Six months. Michael Izzo No, it's six months, isn't it? Joel Simon right? starting. They’re just not clearing their year. So, we're here for an extended for I guess another year Just the whole COVID late start. The whole thing's taken longer than anticipated. So, they plan on John Scarlato Request extension of approval of Zoning variance, Village Code § 250-13.H. 39 Meadowlark Road Lawrence Rose & Lauren Rose 1.2. #19-014 - - https://otter.ai Transcribed by Assuming it's six months? Yes. Joel Simon Joel? Don Moscato Yes. Jamie Schutzer Jamie? Don Moscato Yes. Glenn Brettschneider Glenn? Don Moscato Yes, Steve Berger Steve? conditions set forth therein is otherwise to remain in full force and effect. Okay, let's take a vote. contained here in the Zoning Board of Appeals resolution, dated September 1, 2020. And the Okay, so we'll make that six. Okay. Noting the change. That is specifically modified by amendment Don Moscato It was requested before the Board agreed six, Yeah. Drew Gamils Six months. Yeah. Joel Simon building permit is issued prior to March 2. referenced herein for property located at 39 Meadowlark Road to expire on March 2, 2022. Unless a resolved that the Village of Rye Brook hereby grants a 12 month extension of the variance demonstrates that there's good cause for this for an extension, and he has, now therefore be it - - https://otter.ai Transcribed by So, moved. Joel Simon Okay. Can we have a motion to adjourn tonight's meeting? Don Moscato Yes. Steve Berger that made? Can we Second? Second? Okay. Voting to approve? Yes. grammar school, because of all the duck references. But can I have that motion to? Is that or was I've been called it a lot of things, a lot of variations of Donald learning how to either fight or run in Don Moscato I saw somewhere they refer to Don is Donnie. Jamie Schutzer difficult. They're pretty extensive. out some of the okays and umms, things that don't contribute to the conversation, but it is very Alex and I go through them just so everyone knows. And it is word for word, but I've tried to take Drew Gamils I noticed that. Yes. I have to watch my oks. Seconded. Don Moscato There so literal. So moved, kind of watch their records, every little hesitation. Scary? Steve Berger they're transcript generated. And can I have a motion to approve those two months of minutes? Okay. And our last items are the summary, the minutes the very detailed I might add, because Don Moscato Okay. Thank you very much. John Scarlato that. Good luck, John. Yes. Okay. Don? Yes. Okay. Extension approved. Five ayes, and zero nays. Okay. Thank you for Don Moscato - - https://otter.ai Transcribed by Thank you again, and Drew. Don Moscato Seconded. Okay meeting is officially over. Don Moscato - - https://otter.ai Transcribed by TITLE NOo:WwaTP808864 V1 L • JAN 11 2021 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK NOW OR FMLY COMMON SCHOOL DISM/CY Na 5 BUILDING D E PA RT M E N T R=720 0o ; S-22009'oaPFE 344:39' �8 . WMWREa •ONLINE REW V&WIRREQ MW ovum RE 4R REBAR (20.901 (17Z f97 ,,' r r M. ♦I •' .wwrr.r•wr Mrrl.�KrJ(`-r\•r�r. .r.w.w IN '^&%OJC&r ou wu 141F E la47' R=390& 00 ir •'` �� � - .s fir. q '�j. . 1► � D' ��- r i 40$t MA O COUNTRY RIDGE ESTATES SEC77ON 3 .`ems9WAIM VALVE F1 D NOVEMBER 18, 1964 MAP NO. 14134 VALVE BLOCKL-LOT 15 TAX SEC77ON 129.75 BLOCK i LOT 8 C. PIPE i MEASUREMENT IN U,S.ST DARD AMENDED 4»04-2008--STAKE-OUTONLY .K j THE DIMENSIONS SHOWN HEREON,FROM THE STRUCTURES TO THE PROPERTY LINE,ARE FOR A SPECIFIC PURPOSE ONLY. SEC ON BLOCK DATE LHANEK & PLAN THEY ARE NOT INTENDED TO BE USED FOR THE.ERECTION OF FENCES,STRUCUTURES OR ANY OTHER IMPROVEMFN'T. 12m2l=2007 LAND SURVEY OM.AmCp GUARANTEED TO; ' '• THE MaSTENCE OF RIGHT OF WAYS AND/OR EASEMENTS OF RECORD,.IF ANY,NOT SHOWN ARE NOT GUARANTEED TITLEPRO AGENCY,LLC RYE BROOK UNAUTHORIZED ALTERATION OR ONLY COPIES FROM THE WARAN I ES INDICATED HEREON SHALL RUN OtcilLY'To R -' - ADD ON TO A SURVEY MAR ORIGINAL OF THIS SURVEY THE PERSON FOR WHOM THE SURVEY IS PREPARED,AND. UNITED GENERAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY 'WESTCHE STE 1400-54I.4124 �.•.;w�.:- .V".l� L I ENSED L AND RKED W A Q GItM OF ON HIS BEHALF'TO THE TITLE COMPANY GOVERNN�ENW`AL , M v MAILING ADDRES&. BEARING A � � iTH N Rr COUNTY 1-914-75 304 •. P.O.BOX-178 Y: SURYEYOWS SEAT.IS A V"SOiA'TION LAND SURYEYOR!S EMBOSSED AGENCY AND LENDING INS I I I U I ION LISTED HEh"EON `1•-51E-+4S1-r9S5i$ -'';,`73 WNSTCHEMIR.AVEm U81�I1tTS,IaN EAL HAL.L�.BE CQNSIDERED'� AND TO THE ASSIGNEES QF THE L.ENDx�I[G I ON. GOB NO.: ��718-347-�533 OF SEG1'ION 7Za9,S �,r S S . '"'POUND'iZIDC�fE'N1�' ti576 ,, _ E ,l OF THE NEW YORK STATE BE VALID TRUE COPIES. GUARANTEES ARE NOT TRANSFERABLE TO ADDITIONAL. CAR;EN SUESSMAN 07'�-6$586 FA�C.i 800 149 EDUCATIt?N L.AW. IN QNS OR SUBSEQUENT OWNERB. ',ENTAIL: KP.LSPC*VEPJZON.NE'T' MICHAEL SUESSMAN ♦ J Q/W50FiAm-07-2098 , ' F PLANS MAR. 17 Zo 1 r DATED. it =11TC imp- 8� v WE-v~ ROOK ''J],N_]I��►lr� BUILDING DEPARTMENT I I , • �}Ir�rl�J S06 Pu ff 31 Plot) TIFINAL SURVEY AS gUtL Tp . , ,klrl Fgf REQUIRED PRIOR N(�w r-��M�a FINAL INSPECTION Hlr� -J —QPK'�+'�'',, IGN�o Pe�T�r t' IWt�f� Pi callr 6vr(i "m,G�Mll��rr ° WimpP>r d:Po�15 NW cerlPtsl+ N�� �FCtrl(�Iir1�ST I �Il.M6$.rQ>7 tr&MfwT PWI- 04 Gory OIT P:LI,4N� rul•I� (����I�-her-�rcn� I � H Corl�s�f G ips P6 PI 6T c,�P� .-�NPH INC-f<-kmv 1N �sfl" 1�04 -44 •_� � l-IGFrr��;T I 1'i1�5 � Ian � . I CdrP _ G p�S W(61 fin (14,55 FIT 6wg"p Pa r o pin SoH 614-` Village of I I I I H?� w(L Srz*-P-q1,1 PwP t; turao €arAJ1�u»I,G0NG5�15 �C*C, •IL14 A proval Dote 1_,2021 - -'—. p � . Chairman* i -- �— \Cz : .4111-1 Loll &NIP HPu%w A 5M.6 4Q+ N 60%56,14Y ��� a ti � /Z;39°, � _ *w,.st n t�PaSP�t � errs �c�Fl•�. 1..0 L_ ZZa 1zM'�IM6(�Ra-IHL PAa(sHI I �(� \ 7it�s 33 �'�'M T�I�' rP{TGK SInI�F6 ��\ 6r� � rzio 14EW CWPC(L��Slfllt6 fr,,�,r o�.� 16J U21YI tAK-1 f4 11 105 tl t 113 ` ---�IT Pahl 13o�GP�ofG(�oxi• �� ,. ._,-._r,..._ .....,,...,....,.....:. ........—.........-..-...__... � � �V Sys �I2 I�'I,�H 12-�s1 pl✓µc,E rl•-W Cem e65 r! ?.�Lt N 16 'ro ��n}'� :oPor GH�1 �°�c F3Cft9 Is � r %( �� .rahir1.rk�K-ING �L' Il. �� 3rrSpaui./ mn 1HA bl tH- Pl�1� I _ ___....... �.:.�.......- _.,... ................_.- .. 6 '`b' ?r� x.l..r�rLr.e_ �',Nu�.,s ° <C4 6f' I(i `� 05 •' I � Sa�,wL M 1�1'�-, �Zoe I�•Il� �l;lrUl.�T1uti( ��'•vl��P �YdSTIr>Ct' �P��o�F:D _______ r,__vT._sl?� .._. �: nCr/ti%,. ._....1_�s,c��,^___z4,a�� aa s��_ i• ;,'IZ..nrZc��'....:::jo'�' j.v I?'�I �1'Ic�l ---t 43k9__.._.;.. y 1O r-I II-IL 114wss 75 51S. .Su. HO � f� T o� , I/L' /'GHG-1: '.I Ivelzvl�rhl,Ul � ��E i roo iza .. '1_..7La I , �9;> IT eo 4�_.._._.. ' V 33---L J.__ .7 2 -4O L..10 7-. ... r a���►�t'�T 1 ' , I �+��IZII 6 , , I 11 �v�..4...�...�.....� .. .--- --- I 1 � , 3-�Nri1H �.� . _. _�o._-.....__._ z.3..._. Z AP PR U P-41�,l,(Ayr I I +• f+C.54N 4TUO L N �'� I I 1 j- I r11h�G,�v�1 aolLpl.l�.Ne�crl�1'ts ll�tl. � _1 zi Nl - II .j GNP STK ��torlT11i_ _`o i to .'�°...__.-._.__!__.na .. Rye groo . NW b d Cepc.5a-1 c,rvo r"���i �?x.� MN pL-P _ IG� ,.—. e.� R.Villageplol !�wru . of Y .... � �I..II'I�1��-1,Lp �f� IMA•Xi1lUlr tni�oV�t��l�. N E�+ � Pit- -00 I OKIAl/14 1T('.t:'F�N, L.S3�s.,r �?�3 ��.•^mr"r;=' iwlq-R�P-Orw hticlt�V�I 11 r t� General notes: pZfVA `oV Ap!.I 6 N r ►.ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM TO THE 202DRESIDENTIAL CODE OF NEW YORKSIAiE CONTENT.EXCAVATION MU516E FREE OF WATER WHiLE FORIWDATION WORK IS IN PROGRESS. 2020 ENERGY CONSERVATION CONSTRUCTION CODE OF NEW YORK STATE. TRUCKS.BULLDOZERS OR OTHER HEAVY EQUIPMENT SHALL BE OPERATED WITH CAUTION AND AS WELL AS ANY OTHER SUPPLEMENFAI CODETHAI MAY APPLY.INCLUDING LOCAL IN SUCH A MANNER AS TO CAUSE NO DAMAGE TO FOUNDATION SYSTEMS. i AND MUNICIPAL CODES PER 8LTILDi4G OFFIgM5INSIRUGTION. S'.-ALL STRUCTURAL SIEELSHALL DE NEW.CLEAN AND STRAIGHT. P✓J.�i V I �(��Ri`fj La rt 2.CONTRACTOR SHALL PRomcr&BRACE ALL WORK FROM DAMAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION. STRUCTURAL SIM WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE DESIGN. h r I!I ! PROVIDE STIFFENER ANGLES OR PLATES UNDER ALL POSTS.COLUMNS OR STRUTS THAT ARE q II °t 1 �Alp W O BIZ-$1" cT P ��`�I I� �H�� I 0.ALL WORK TO BE PLUMB&TRUE.ALL PLUMBING WORK TO DE IN COMPLIANCE WITH 202D RCNYS CARRIEO BY STEEL BEAM AND W THE WED OF BEAMS CANTILEVERED OVER COLUMNS OR ,� T WHERE APPLICABLE.ALL ELECTRICAL WORK TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH N.F.C.ALL NVAC BEAMS SUPPORi0,10 HANGERS.UNLESS OTHERW49 SHOWN OR SPECIFIED PROVIDE 4xBxI/r ��,:.•r.:. WORK TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH ASHRAE STANDARDS,LATESF EOI►ION,ALL CONTRACTORS Ai40 BEARING ON CONCRETE MASONRY IF ANY. SUD•CONTRACTORS SHALL BE LICENSED AND INSURED,ALL PLUMBERS AND ELECTRICIANS ARE RESPONSMIJ!FOR ANY ADDITIONAL PERMOS,APPROVALS AND INSPECTIONS THEW PARTICULAR 10.HEADERS TO BE(01 r X IIrIN 2x6 WALLS OR 12)2-X TO-I N 2X4 WALLS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 7,x I u(1.1 rq�GI iRAOE MAY REQUIRE 11.RSVLMNION IN FLOORS.WALLS AND CUINGS TO BE A COMBINATION OF FIBERGLASS BAT. p !tdrid 4.LUMBER MATERIALS USED iN THE BUILDING SHALL BE GOOD.SOUND.DRY FREE FROM ROT, CONTINUOUS RIGID,OR SPRAY FOAM OR CELULOUS INSULATION TYPES TO CONFORM TO LARGE AND LOSE KNOTS,SHAKES AND OTHER IMPERFECTIONS WHEREBY THE STRENGTH 202D ENERGY CONSERVATION CONSTRUCTION CODE NEW YORKS1AtE, U WTI I�' 31.p11 MAY BE IMPAIRED. WESTCHESIER COUNTY R CLIMATE ZONE M. ALL LUMBER SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE AMERICAN WOOD COUNCILS TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE.BELIEF AND PROFESSIONAL JUDGEMENT THESE PLANS AND (Yl I n NATIONAL DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS FOR BENDING STRESS AND DEFLECTION. SPECIFICATIONS ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH 2020ECCCNYS. L 1�C>Q VF,Yjr 1y1 ALL WORXMANSKF INCLUDING BLOCKING.MILLING,BRIDGING ECi.SHILL CONFORM 10 CODE. PROYLAM LEDGER BLOCKING.HAMERS AND ROUGH FRAMINO HARDWARE AS REQUIRED, 12.All FOOTINGS TO BE A MINIMUM OF J'•S'Bhbw GRADE OR tOCM FROST DEPTH AS SPECIFIED BY ,� BTf AND RAPIERS TO BESET WITH NATURAL CROWN UP. THE ARCHOECi.UNDERPIN WHEN NECESSARY. P?c ALL BEAMS,JO a I!��1 �p{ 1 , e All" PROVIDE DOUBLE RAFTERS AND HEADERS AROUND All ROOF SKYLIGHTS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ALL LUMBER SFIAU BEAR VISIBLE GRADE STAMP.ALL STRUCTURAL UIMOER INCLUDING BUT NOT II HOUSE 10 CONFORM TO ANY LOCAL SUPPLEMENTAL COD I- o1�P�+T LIMITED TO Tn TGL&LVL BEAMS OR EQUIVALENT SHALL 0E INSTALLED PER DRAWINGS MID lj MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS.AU HANDLING AND INSiALLAiION PROCEDURES MiST BE 14.PROVIDE BLOCKING AS REQUIRED TO BEARING POSTS ONTO GIRDER OR BEAM CONDITIONS SUPPLIED BY THE MANUPACIURER AND SHALL BE FOUOWED,111 JOISTS AND LVL BEAMS SHALL AND VERIFY ALL BEARING TO FOOTING. r46 ' I 1 j c)�y1n NOT BE ALLOWED 10 GET WET AT ANY iME 1&ALL DECK PAILS AND STAIR HANDRAILS SHALL CONFORM TO THE202D KY.$.BUILDING CODE Poo✓ W f'"� I r S.WIM USE Of ANY TRUSS TYPE.PRE-ENGINEERED OR TIMBER CONSTRUCTION A SIGN WILLBE SECTIONS 1014 HANDRAILS AND 1014 GUARDS. Q C �` .Q] J f•I.L11 UHG 141, f 1I i f HG PLACEDT. OR ADJACENT TO ELECTRIC METER W{RN SPECIFICATIONS PROVIDED 0Y THE 16.ALL ROOF FRAMING SYSTEMS SHALL BE B'ISTALLEO imm FOGH WIND CONNECTORS(HURRICANE ARCHITECTIES)IN COMPLIANCE WITH 2020 N.Y.S.BUILDING CODE rp; N �,I,•p IlL 4Z)I r:;4o,l 6.ALL 2=REiI WORK,CODE AND W YORKI�1TE METHODS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE 17.ALL POSTS TO FOUNDATION FOR 114E PURPOSE OF SUPPORiR�THE ROOF OR OTHER STRUCTURAL -� WITH Z020 RESIDENTIAL CODE OF 1GYY YORK RATE CHAPTER B. ELEMENTS U ML BLOCKNG AS SPECUED BY INEARCH]W OR A NOMNALDIMEMION OF 4X4 o M ALL CONCRETE SHALL BE TYPE-1.ROOD PSi COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH AS 28 DAYS. FROM STRUCTURAL ELEMENT TO BE SUPPORTED CONRINUOUSLY TOA SOLID MASONRY REINFORCING BARS SHALL Of SECURELYTIEO IN PLACE SO AS 10 PREVENT DISPLACEMENT FOUNDATION THAT EXTENDS BELOW REQUIRED MOST DEPTH AND RESTS ON A FOOTING OF -P,�, U eI c�l'o ; 3h i(�l r/J.,� W dl'-046 DURING CONCRETING.REINFORCING SHAH BE ACCURATELY INSTALLED TO REQUIRED ELEVATION TYPICAL CONSTRUCTION. 411 6,o4G 5L,&8 � 7.CONTRACTORS TO VERIFYALLCONOMONS AND DIMENSIONS PRIOR TO SIAR1IN0 WORK. 18.ALL SIMPSON STRONl3 TIE CONNECTORS AND ANCHORS ARE DESIGNED WITH SPECIFIC LOADS A140 1 1 3 ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE TO BE REPORTED TO ARCHITECT.ALL WR47EN OIdENSIONS ON CAPACITIES.SUBSTITUTIONS OF THESE HANGERS FOR DIFFERENT MODEL NUMBERS THAN P�/�1 ipt��G lad 1 1 I' '11 THE DRAWINGS SHAH TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER ANY SCALED DIMENSIONS. SPECIFIED BY THE ARCHITECT OR 84GWM 5 FORBIDDEN WITHOUT VERIFYING THE REPLACEMENT (rCP�5aW i IL ALL FOOiRNGS SHALL BEAR ON UNDISTURBED VIRGIN SOIL HAVING A MUNNUM SAPS BEARING PART WITH THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL. I�1`' �I I �b�i' CAPACITY OF 2 TONS PER SQ.Fr.BRACE RETARNINO WALLS OR FOUNDATION WALLS AS R' REQUM.BACKRLLWITHAPPROVEDMAfERSAL,BACXFIUNNGUNDERSLABS.AROUND'ri PIERS AND ON EACH SIDE OF FOUNDATION WALLS SHALL BE DOPE IN LAYERS NOT TO EXCEED I D INCHES.COWACTION SMALL BEM OF MANHUM DENSELY AT OPTIMUM MOISTURE i lc 10 V 0 ' ap 4ff1Fl Ht�ray( Ns PFT� �1� 1 NSW zsm L.(F,Pat,4 J �2�I�GyR-I•Ir �-I'i(L 17�ol.n 17�`'i�� � �S)` +__•_ i 1,�.1as�PP!►�L I�.!-�ga(9rlG "�1-1�W WGct� pas'f� Avow _153—DzLdl F I,14 O�HPA (Zook I 1 44k W Czhft tT t r414G I o ! uf��-i. ..•: - YtPFl t• I�i✓�C�cF�R -• Sl-�`IZI�'r0�yL, Nantucket 26 In.Round Concrete Natural Gas Fire Bowl In Athens Gray by Modeno>' l7L4 nY °oil- -------- • N Azm GN Le-) N� I 0 44 P*64 64)7,73—2.35-0 P15T i FVj ; N OS'7-3..�:..:. _. .. t olr- I I rT( N Z,Al o e 11110 i� H rNl. l a� b , a rdnc4a M144 - 5'11HG .�m 1)t6 pl/ : IED pP6,rr L, 'A I. J� N,q 5 r�.�f'L f•. T 2020 RESIDENTIA CODE ' ' . .. , . " . !i TABLE Rs07.3,1 SECTION h607 MINIMUM FOOTING SIZE FOR DECKS TABLE R607,6 . _ TABLE RS07.6'' EXTERIOR DECKS' ' �"} A"� LIVE OR LOAD BEARING VALUE of SOILS"Ono DECK BEAM SPAN LENGTHS••°•:(feet=Inches) DECK JOIST SPANS FOR COMMON LUMBER SPECIES(fL•In.),' • ' : R5D7,1 Decks.Wood-framed decks shall be,!n aacortanee OF-NEW YVK STATE I GROUND TRIBUTARY 1600' Z000. 2600• 270110` DECK 1019TSPANLE55THANOREQUALT01' ALLOWABLEJ015TSPAN° MA1(IMUMCANTiLEVER•ti SNOW AREA Bide of e D molar o o S do of a Dlemoler of a 51 0 0l o D omotor of o Sldo or o D omatar of o SPECIES° SIZE° (food ° SIZE SPACING OF DECK JOISTS SPACING with Ibis aedtlon.For'decks uslrig materials and conditions LOAD°• (sq.U.)• agttaro lacuna round footing T jnaho js square tooling round fgoling T�nockhrh09ss square fooling round footing Thlaknsss square footing round looting Thldtnoas a 0 10 12 14 1s 18 SPECIES OF DECK JOISTS WITH CANTILEVERS • I not prescribed ih nits section,refer to Section R301. •, (Pao (Iraluos) (Inches) ( Onchos) (Inches) ) oltchas) (Incites) (Inchon) (Inchon) •(Inchos) Onclno9) •(Inches)- • . R507.2 Materials.Materials'used for We construction of R507.2.2.3 Decay resls(anch,Plastic composite deck 20 12 14 6 12 14 6 12 14 •G ' 12 14 6 1 2 x 6 4.1 l 4-0, 3.7 3.3 3-0 2=10 2•B (Iriche9) l Y P 12 10 24 12. 18 24 + • decks shall comply with flits section, boards,stair treads,guards and handrails containing ' 40 14 16 6 2 14 6. 12 ' 14 6 12 . 14 6 I-2 X 8 5-11 5.1 4-7 4-2 2-10 3-7 3-5. : I-2 x t0 7-0 6.0 5-5 4•I1 4-7 4-3 4.0 2 x 6 9-1 l 9-0 7.7 1.3 1-4 1-6 .R507,2.1 Wood materials:Wood mplertela shill be No.2 wood,cellulosic or otiidr biddegradable mata:dals shalt GO 17 19 G is , t. 6 13 5 12 6 2 x 8 13-I I 1-10 9-8 2=1 2-3 2.5 grade or better lumber,preservative-trended in accordance . be decay.resistant in accordance with ASTM 67032, so 20 22 7 .17 19 6 15 17 6 14 J6 6 1-2 x 12 8.3 7-1 fn-4 S-10 5-5 .5.0 4-9 Soulhem pine . 1 with Section R317,or appndVed,naturally durable lumber, R507.2.2.4 Termite resistance.Where required by 40 tea 22 25 8 19 21 6 17 19 G is 17. 6 2-2 x G 6-11 5.11 5.4 4-10 4-6 • 4-3- 4-0 2 x 10 16-2 14.0 11-5 .3•4 ,3.6 •.'2.10 . , • and tenuite protected where required in accordance with Section 318,plastic composite deck boards,stair treads, '120 24 27 9 zl 23 7 19 21 17 19 6 2-2 x 8 8-9 7-7 6-9 G-2 5.9 • 5-4 .5-0 2 x 12 18-0• 16.6 , 13.6 4-6 •4-2 . 3.4 .. •' Section R318.Where design ib accordance with Section guards and handrails containing wood,cellulosic or 140 26 29 10 22 25 6 20 2) 7 18 21 6 southern pine;•. 2 x 6' 9-6 8.6 7.2 1-2 1-3 1;5 . .. 2-2 t(10 10.4 9-0 8-0 7.4 6.9 6.4 6-0 R301'is provided,wood•sttuctural inentbers shall be • otter biodegradable materials shall be termniti resistant 160 28 31 I 24 37 9• 21 24 a 20 22 7 Douglas fir-larclid, • 2-2 x 12 t2-2 10-7 9-5 8-7 8-0 7-6 7-0 g 2 x 8 12-6' I1-1 9.1 (•It. 2-1. 2-3 designed using Ilia wet service factor defined in AWC in accordance with ASTM D7032. .20 tz ' 14 6 12 14 6 12 14 G 12 14 6 Ilem-fir, NDS.Cuts,notches'and drilled holes of preservative- 3-2 x 6 '8-2 7-5 6-8 6.1 5-B 5-3 5-0 spruce•pine•fhia, 2 x!0. •15=8•' 13.7 11.1 3•I .3-S 2-9 ,, ' R507t2.2,611t5ta0atlon of plastic composites,Plastic 40 IS 17 6 13 15 G 12 14 6 l2 14 6 2 x 12 18-0 15�9 12-10 4-6 3-I I 3-3 treated wood members shall be treated in acc6rdenee with ' composite deck boards,st urr treads,guards and hand- 60 19 21 6 16 la 6 14 16 6 13 I5 6 3-2 x 8 10-10 9.6 8-6 7-9 7-2 6-B G•4 :,, SeatIon it317,1.1,Atl.preservstive-treated wood products rails shall be installed in hecordanbe with,this code and g0 21 24 ' 8 19 21 6 17 19 6 15 17 6 3-2 x t0 13.0 11-3 10.0 9-2 8-6 7-11 7-6 2 x 6 8-10' 8-0 7-0 .14. 1.1 1.2 ' ' in contact with tire ground shall be labeled for such usage: h Redwood,• . the mtuhufactth�er a instructions. 100 24 27 9 21 23 7 t9 . 21 6 17 19 G 3-2 x 12 15-3 13-3 11-10 10.9 10.0 9-4 8.10 we'slent cedars, 2 x 8 I1-8 10-7 8-8 1.8,' 1-10 2.0 • i R507.2.1.1 Eriglneered wood products,Engineered. R507:2,3 Fasteners and connectors.Metal fasteners and l20 26 30 !0 23 26 s 20 23 7 t9 zi G 3 x 6 or 2-2 x 6 5-5 4.8 .4-2 3-10 3-G. 3-I 2.g, ponderosa pine', 2 x l0 14•I t 13-0 10-7 2-6 2-10 2-8 I� wood products shall'be in accordance with Sector cobrlcctors used for all decks shall be in accordance with 140 2a 3z t 1 2s 2e 9 22 25 8 20 23 7 red piria• , R502. Section R317.3 and Table R507.2.3. 3 x 8 or2-2 x 8 6-10 5-it. 5.4 4-10 4-G 4-1 3-B 2 x 12 17-5 15-1 12.4 3-l0 .3-9 3�1 16D 30 34 l2 26 30 10 24 27 9 21 24 8 3 x 10 or 2-2 x 10 8-4 7-3 6 6 5-I 1 5-6 5-1 4.8 For 81:I binds 25A rum,1 taut p 304.8 am,1 pound per square foot 0.0479 kPn,I pound 0.454 kg. . R507.2,2 Plasticdfi composite deck boards,:tali treads, R507.2,4 Flashing.Flashing shall be corrosion-resistant 20 12 14 6 12 14 6 12 14 6 12 14 6 n.Nc.2gmdowlthwcl'scrvlccmctcr, gourds,to hue d s,g Plastic composite exterior deck 'tifetal of nominal thickness not less than 0.019 trials 0.48 40 16 19 6 14 16 6 13 •14 6 12 l4 Douglas fir-larch', 3 x 12 or 2-2 x 12 9-8 8-5 7-6 6-10 6.4 5-11 5.7 0 ., ' Is.Ground snow load,live loud 40 psf,deed load !0 psi,L�-360. boards,stair treads,guards end handrails shell comply �)or approved nonmetallic material flint is compatible 60 20 23 7 17 20 G 16 Is 6 14 16 6 hern-fir•, 4 x 6 6-5 5-6 ,4-11 4-6 4-2 3-11 3.8 e.Ground allow load,live land-40 per,dead land o 10 par,LA-360 at main span,L/A-160 at eanillover m011h a 220-pound point load npplled to and. ,• with ilia requirements of ASTM D7032 and this section. with the substrate of the structure and tie decking materl- spruce-pine•f e, d.Includes incising factor. 8o 23 2G 9 20 23 7 Is' 20 6 ifh 19 G 4 x 8 8-5 7-3 6-6 5.11 5-6 S-2 4-10 R507.2.2.1 Labeling,•Plastic composite deck boards als. 60 redwood, F.Northeta species with no Incising flrctor. • and stair treads,or their packaging,shall bear a label 100 2G 29 10 2z 25 8 20 23 7 Is' 21 6 western cedars, 4 x l0 9-1 l 6-y 7-8 7.0 6.6 6-1 5-8 L Cantilevered spans not exceeding ilia nomlntl depth of Iho joisl are permitted.' .' . that indicates compliance with ASTM'.D7032•,end R607,2.5 Aliertadie materials.Alternative materials, 120, 28 32 ' 11 25 28 9 22 25 8 20 23 7 ponderosa pine; 4 x 12 11-5 9-11 8-10 8.1 7.6 7-0 6-7 , . p •.including glass and metals,shall be permitted. 140 31 35 12 27 30 10 24 27 9 22 24 a red piper .. Inchidgs lite allowable load and maximum„allowable .3-2 x 6 7-4 6-8 6-0 5-6 5-1 4-9 4-6 TABLE R607.7 "'�' • span determined In accordance ivith ASTM D7032. ''R607.3 Footings.Decks shell be supported an concrete foot- 160 33 37 13 28 32 t I 25 29 to 23 26 9 MAXIMUM JOIST SPACING FOR DECKING Plastic or composite handrails and guards,or thou Ings or othefopproved structural systems designed toaccom- 20 l2 l ,6 12 14 . 6 12 ____14__ G 12 14 G 3-2 X 8 9-8 8-G 7-7 G-11 G-5 G•0 5-8 MAXIMUM ON OENTER J015T SPACING -`•`'- mOdatO all ioed9 In aCCOrdanCe-W!(Ii SCClIOn R301.Deck 40 18 20 fir IS r 17 6 ••14 • IS 6 ••l2 14 6 _ -2 X 10 12-0 10-5 9.4 8•G 7-l0 7-4 G-ll DECXlhGMATERIALTYPBANDNOMINALSIZE (#heltii�it�'g,'shall lieaF Ir label that:ilJdicgtea'coiii)SllaOce - _ 3 .. artejolal.,.• .rpoakingdlagoncltojelel ' ...e.l.S. with ASTM D7032 and includes the maximum allow-• to stall be sized to carry the Imposed loads from the .60 21 24 B 19 21 6 17 19 6 l5 17 , 6 _ - - Docking parpolidlcul ,. 1-. • 3-2 x 12 13-11 12-! 10-9 9-10 9-1 8.6 8-1 , - •` '• �j deck structure to die'round as shown in Figure R507.3,T'he - l/�Inch-thick wood 16 iilohes 12 inches I able span determined In ai:cordnnce with ASTM. g so 25 '28 9 21 24 8 19 22 7 '1s . 20 G For 81:1]rich-25.4 min, foot 304.8 mm,I pound per square fool-0.0479 kPa,I pound-0.454 kg, ' . D7032. fabling depth shall be In accordance with Section R403.1.4. 70 a,Ground snow load,live load-40 psi,dead land-l0 psf,L/A-360 at main span,UA-180 at cantilever with n 220•pound point land applied at ilia end 2-Inch-thick wood 24 Inches 16 Incites • . . too 26 31 It. 24 27. 9 21 24 8 20 •22 7 Exception: Free-stondin sec b.Banns supporting deck joists from one due only. Pltiatc com Ira In accordance wtUt Section It507 2 In accordance with Section RS07.2 1067.2,2.2 Fldme spread Index.Plastic composite P g ka consisting of joists 120 30 34 13 26 30 10 24 27 9 21 24 8 c.No.2 smile,wet service ra mot. . deck boards,stair treadd,guards,and hdndrails shall direOtly suppdrlod on grade over their entire,length, 40 33 37 13 28 32 11 25 29 10 23 26 9 d.Boom depth shall ba graeler than or cqud to depth of jousts ivid,a flush beam condition, For SI;I Inch-25.4 mm,1 foot-304.8 nun,I degree-0.01745 rod. , exhibit a flame spread Index not exceeding 100 when• R507.3.1 Wrilmtun size.The minimum size of concrete' I60. 35 40 15 30 34 Iz 27 31 I t 25 2B y a includes Inctdhhg factor. m.Maximum angio of 45 degrees from perpendlaulnr for wood deck boards, . f.Northern species.Incising factor not Included. tested In aaeordahce whit ASTM E84 or TJL 723 with faptings shall be,in accordance with Table R507.3.1, For 8T:1 Inch-25A rom,I squoto fgol-0.0929 ins,I pound per square fool-0,0479 kPn, a Assumes minimum square fooling to be 12 incites x 12 inches x 6 Incheq for 6 x 6 post. g.atom cantilevers are limited to the n,1Ja«nl beau,'x span dlvlded by 4, ' the test specimen remaining in place during the test. based on the tributary area and allowable soil-bearing e.lnterpolallors permitted,extrapolation not perrhltled.• d.If die support Is a brick or CMU pier,flit fooling shall bove a minimum 2-Inch projection on all sides. ' . Exception:Plastic composites determined to be •pressure In accordance with Table R41)1.4.1. b.Based on highest food case;Dead+Live or Dead+&low. at.Area,in square feel,of dock outface supported by post and futtings. $HEATHOJG• , TABLE R607.B,1.3(1) SIDING noncombustible. DECK LEDGER CONNECTION TO BAND&ST'•° NOTE: • ' R607,0.2 Decic•Joist'lateral restraint.Joist ends and' (Deck live toad Q 40 psf,deck dead load a 10 psf,snow loads 40 ps0 . THIS DETAIL 19 APPLICABLE ' TABLE R607.2.3 !i"MINIMUM FOR WHERE FLOOR JOISTS ARE FLASHING FOR . • •' '' •'FASTENER AND COIVIVECTOR SPECIFICATIONS FOR DECKSae • . ,' ,. bearing locations shall be provided with lateral resistance � ,1otsT SPAN PARALLEL TO DECK JOISTS,' , WATERTIGHTNESS.. . . . to prevent ro(aton.Whets lateral restraint Is provided b BEAM 9PLlOES CONNECTION DETAILS 8 and lase B 1 to B 01 to 10 1 1 to 12 2'1"to 14' 14'1"to 10 18'1"1018I I ' ITEM MATERIAL MINIMU FINISHiCOATING ALTERNATE FlNISHICOATING p p y BEAM SPLICE -`--1<. • OF REQUIRED) . DECKING joist hangers or blocking baiween Joists,their depth shell (IF REQUIRED) ,..�' �-6 on-canter spacing orfmilonora . In accordance with Stainless steel,silicon bronze or MUST 0Cct1(t� '� 1_ � '/inch diameter la screw with h/inch ` Nails and Ilmherdvals Hot-dipped galvanized per ASTM A153 equal not less Than 60 present of tie joist depth.Where tat- .� s' g :- . ASTM Flti67 copper ' OVER POST• � �� moxlmum sheallminge'd 30 23 18 15 13 11 }0 Bolls' In accordanco with Hot-dipped galvanized per ASTM A1$3,Close C am)restraint is provided by rim joists,they shall be ��1 1 O O APPROVED JOIST HANGERS , a , secured to the end of each joist with not fewer titan three �„ O !,-Inch diemaler bolt with/,-inch mozhummh Logecrewa ASTM A307(bolls), . (Class D for!-inch dtatnalerand less br mechanl-SlolnleM bt ` [10 a 36 36 34 29 24 21 19 2 MIN. •2x EDGER WiTH FAS`fENERIS '. (b e )' eel,silicon tuenzc or I0d(3-Inch b 0.128-Inert 76 mm b 3.3 mm nails or e o ahemUhlag, (including m,ls and ASTM A563(nuts), catty galvanized paA9Ttvt)3695,CIaSs 55 or 410 copper y )( y ) a I- IN ACCORDANCE WffFI TABLE R60T.2 washers ASTM F844 washers stainless steel three No.tOx 3-Inch 76 mat Ion wood screws. '•�•� F /,Inch diameter bolt with 1-Inch maximum ,' . (washers) ( ) g 4 shentin 36 3G 29 24 2l 18 16 APPROVED`f. U'. HOLD•DOWN 06VIC9 MIN 760 LB,CAPACITY - ASTM A653 type 0185 zhme coated galvanized R507.7 Decking.Maximum allowable spacing for joists sup. FLOOR JOISTS AT4 LOCATIONS EVENLY DISTRIBUTED Par menufaclurcr'e steel or post hot-df ed galvanized r ASTM Posr CAP For St.:I Maeb-25A min,t toot-304.8 mm,1(Icon - ALONG DECK ARD ONE W HIN 24 OF EACH . , per aquoro foot 0.0479 kPs. . . Mehl cowlectora p° PP 8° Stainless steel poring decking shall be in aceordarroe with Tabld 12507.7. a.Ledgers shall be flashed Ix necordanee with Seedon R703A to prevent water from conaellug the haunt band joist. END OF THE LEDGER.HOLD-DOWN DEVICES • specification A 123 providing n mlutntwn averoga coating • Wood deckingshall be attached to each supporting member b.Snow food shell not be oisumad to act concurrent)will,Ova load. SHALL FU LY ENG E DECK JOIST PER ' • i weight of2.0 az./fi'total Imtb alder Pp g BEAM OVER POST CAP BEAM OVER POST Y L AA�� , g ( ) with not less than two'lld threaded nails or two No.8 wood c,Tile tip of the Ins screw Winn ally extend beyond the Inside face ortha band jots]. HOLD-DOWN MANUFAGTURER. For SI:I Inch-25.4 mm,1 foot-304.8 mm. • screws.Oiler approved decking or fisiener systems shall be, d Sheolhing shall be,wood stroMuml pond or solid snmvn lumber. . .' I a.quly llont matedatp,coatings and finls4es stroll be pernducd. Installed In aeeordtinee Willi the manufacturer's installation For Sll Iinch-25,4 mar, a Sheathing dtdl be permitted to be wood altuoiurtt panel,gypsum board,flberbatrd,lumber or fonnu Wreathing.Up to 4s•h,cb lblcknosn of slacked washore A FULLY THREADED tile•DIAMEYER LAG .. , b.Fsateners and connectors exposed to ioll water or located within 300 feet of a sell woier sltoreune shall be stainless Bled. shop be permitted to substiluio for up to%,Inch of nllowabla sheathing thickness where eanbbhed with wood structural pnnci or Insulter sheathing. SCREW PREORILLED W/MIN.9'PENETRATION 1 r r .. requirements. FIGURE R607.6.1(1 t a Hales Ibr bolls stroll be,drilled o adnlmuta/„Inch Attu a mrudmlari/u lacn larger than Uht boll, DECK BEAM TO DECK IOST TO CENTER OF TOP PLATE,STUDS,O HEADER. •• •.) d.Los screws 4,Inel,and larger stall be predrillEd to avdld wood tiplllling per the National Design Spaelfleellmi(NDS)far Wood Conslrocdon. • •• . . ., ... :,,• . e.Stnlnlete-steel•driven fasteners droll be in oeeordweo tvlUh ASTM FI6G7. R607.8 Vertical and lateral supports.Where supported by '[j r4 n`. l'•••a 4.; • , TABLE R607.8.1.3(2) Far SI:l Inch d 25.4 mm,]fool-304 B corn:, • . . attrichment to an exterior-wall,decks slush be'posllivefy . "o!� 0 . PLACEMENT OF LAG SCREWS AND BOLTS IN DECK LEDGERS AND BAND JOISTS . anchored to the Illna 6lntclUre and designed for both Ve[lI- MINIMUM END AND EDGE DISTANCES AND SPACING BETWEEN ROWS FIGURE R607.0.2(2) primary g r •+ DECK ATTACHMENT FOR LATERAL LOADS 1z'MIN .f-MANUFACTURED POST dONNEbTOR l:a `, : '°'••• I TOP EDGE BOTTOM EDGE ENDS ROW SPACING • cal and lateral loads.Such attachment abet)not be ocean- : : • ,1*A t. r IN ALLOWABLE SOICS 1161 I% 0.+��J�''yy.'�y 'MULTIPLE-PLYif� '' , ° , TYPICAL PTP+asr plished by(Ile use of toenails or hails subject to withdrawal. .•;:- . 'TF. ,-� '-.'t Ledger' 2 inches'' /;nett 2lnclhos !/incites° _ % - % i For decks with cantilevered framing members,connection(o i I r i Band Joist 114 Inch' 2 Inches 2 inches°' isle lndm . h h � ! .' _v__ exterior walla or other framing in'elnbers shall be designed and �!a. `psf`.1M".�''�'.1. �" i" .;•f For SIt I mall=25.4 nun, xi constructed to resist uplttt resulting from the lltll Ilve load •r' i 0 OL7 ,:'tsv a.Log serows or bolts shall be staggered from ilia lop to ilia bottom along the horlaontnl run of the deck ledger In neeordanee with Figure 1t507.9.1.3(1). I specified in Table R301.5 acting on die candlovered portion of , � � '. b.Maximum 5 inches. GRADE - -, `/r i ' ^• `` ll= the,decll.WheT6 positive couneetioh to the primary building _ . 4_r I. . a.For engineered tIm jolets,Ilia manurnclurer's recommendation,shall govern. ;I . '0 structure ennhot be verified during Inspection;decks shell be ;" I il �>,0 1.. .d d.Thhe minimum distance Rom bottom ww of tog screws of bolls to the top edge of the ledgar stall be In accordance wills Figure 11507.9.1.3(q. �' '. r t., self-supporting. g I' i r -v ,'- _- '.• 'r •. • • 1 ,�S 1�K f N STAGGER FASTENERS ,t (� I `•*, I I A0. , R507,0 Vertical and lateral supports et band Joist,Vertical i , • i '' I. IN 2 Rowe L.�_�.J I_.__.J L.� _:-J. _ and lateral supports for decks shall comply with this sect :F F1 U' 1N: ""' -IPW i ; __ i' �h�oc.�-�ri it�I.l�/zo z/ ' f~ ' • d DIAMETER 1 R507.0.1 Vertical supports.Vertical loads sholl be trans- t .z ° INit ® ® 6 Bo(WIN.FOR 2 X 8 DISTANCE SHALL BE PERMITTED TO DEPTH THROUGH BOLTS PP .;, ,,`:, 5"MAX 6.6 MIN.FOR 2 X`10 BE REDUCED TO 4.5 IF LAG SCREWS .I�---* PER TABLE ferret to band cols with ledgers in accordance with trig -:IRA`j �, r' PER TABLE , IN BOTH DIRECTIONS / L j g .. !'�: ' .r...� 7.6"MIN.FOR 2 X 12 AQE USED OR BOLT SPACING 18 t NOTE N0T8CREWS section. , 1; MINIIAUM 12' . a M�• ' ® I I ! OF EMBEDMENT �. REDUCED TO THAT OF LAG BCREWS • > TOATTACH 2 X a LEDGERS TO 2 X 8 .n . 4"GRAVEL-'1 't` •'r I l 2•MIN BAND JOISTS, •' I . . R607.0.1.1 Lodger details.Deck ledgers shall be a ---•-�:1-�' x" - -.r..._ t I; 1 N01 Et minimum 2-inch by B-Inch(51 nun by 203 mm)pant- f. i ."'t7'f'' • .. :,o t,s LEDGER LAG SCREW OR BOLT 3f4"MIN. 1 i ,.• .POSTS MUST BE CENTERED ON OR W FOOTING net, pressure-preservative-treated Southern pine, `-'�' , . , I P. . , v iliciseil pressure-preservative-treated hem-fir, or ....-� -)...,.;;: Y... ..v Forsfr Ihhclt=25~4mnu. s Far81.I Itch-25.4mam. • •,• 11 W, Gi approved,naturally durable,No.2 grade or hater hum- ,s•q i FIGURE R607.9,1.3(1) i ' •TIGURE R607.3 her.Dook ledgers ahnll not support concentrated loads I' I' I. r. PLACEMENT OF LAG SCREWS AND BOLTS IN LEDGERS . i . DECK POSTS TO DECK FOOTING CONIVEOTION J from beams or girders,Deck ledsere shall iiot be sup- :t t P.� .,-:. .'"`';?1 II ` a i21,�-ro j]L, i yr. ! R507.6 Deck behrns;Maximum allowable spans for wood ported oil atone or masonry veneer. =1`( _. •t•. ,�'2•c . R507.3.2 Mlrilinurn deptii.Deck.footings shall extend p - "W-41*""'-'� .. deck beams,as shown In Figure R507.5 shall be in accordance below the frost lino 403.1 4 lit Table R301.2(l)In occor- It507,0.1.2 Band joist details.Band joists supporting a EXTERIOR SHEATHING Aru-�-�-I••• r 'dance.with Section R403.1.4.1. •wilt Table R507.5.Beam plies elhail be fastened with two rows For sl:tInch-2s.4 mn,, I '�ledger shall be a nit hinium 2-inch-nominal(51 mm)1. of 10d(3•lach x 0;128-inert)nails minimum at 16 Inches(406 Exceptions: tnm.on center aloii each edge.Beams shall be permitted to solid•sawn,spruce-pine-fir or better lumber or a mini- FIGURE R5o7.6.1(2) F�(19T1N0 STUD WALL I g g p. t NOTCHED POST•T'O•BEAM CONNECTION '• 33 P`'(IZ 11+ii it.�'l/v lnuiri 1-Inch b 9/inch 25 ttwi x 241 Trim dlnhen- I.Free-standing decks ll►at'rilet+t all of Ills following ,cali(ilever at each sad tip to,one-fourilt of the allowable beam Y �- ( 1 criteria: span.Deck bdains of ether materials shall be erinitted where atonal,Douglob4 fir or better,laminated veneer lumber. PRIMARY ' EXISTING 2x BAND JOIST I 1 da9lgned in accordance with accepted englneering prsctices. Bond Joists shall bear Wlly on We primary structure RIM STRUCTURE PRIMARY OR ENGINEERED RIM BOARD - . . . GM('ry `•I`'� I(,?S'd�• . . 1.1.•Tito joists beer directly on irecast,con= FOR CANTILEVERED STRUCTUIte� . chili pier blocks at grade wtthout'sup- capable of pu(lporting all required Toads. Jo1gT8 �il y��-�, R607.6.1 Decll beam bearlrig.Tltr ends of beams shall SLoOrallo OR �.�I-d rL (�f�'1 3-/�v port by beams or posts... 'have not less than 1'/r Inches(38 mm)of bearing on woos) R507.9.1.3 Ledger(o band joist details.Fasteners OTHER LATTERAL LEDGER LEDGER 2•MIN. PECK JOiST ' . 1 1.2.The,Aran ofthe deck does not exceed 200 or metal end not less Ilion 3 Incites(76,min)of bearing on Used in deck ledger connections lit accordance with REQUIRED OVER BOARD JOIsT eoARD ' square feat(18.h lint), cahorete or masonry for the enlite width of the beans. Table R507.9.1.3(1)allot be,hot-dipped gnlvaitlzed or 'M 9-M MIN, `•j . •• 1.3.The walking surface is not more than 20•' ' *here t6ultipte-span beams beer oh intermediate posts, stainless steel and shall be,installed in accordance with • 5°MAXhL LAG SCREWS OR BOLTS n . ' • .inches(616 min)above grade at any 'each l must have frill bearing on(Ile post in accordance Table R507.9.1,3 2 and Figures 11507.9.1.3 I and •. .2"MIN. ' ply g P () () (��� Ilk . point within 36 incites(914 mm)men- with Figures R507.5.1(1)and R507.5.1(2). R507.9.1.3(2), Joker JOISTS .__�U r_✓S 11v��•_ � 510p"'�'_.-. cured horizontally train the edge JOISTS MANGER �' o°'' - :; MANGER BEkAI EACH END FLOOR FRAMING , D' o•, �/, 4Vr1,51&,-r1-wL,:, ,.2.Free-standing deoks need not be provided with R507.5.2 Deck boom connection to supports.Deck R507.9.1.4 Alternate ledger detatis.Alternate fram- atcAM o'-'a•0 4A JOIST HANGER 7i3 1�"�(I`I•G I I footings flint extend below the frost lint. beams shall be attached to supports in a manner capable bf ins'configurallons p ipporting a ledger constructed to • .. t a, 4.Q ttensferrin vertical loads and Tesistin horizontal dis- meet tits load requirements of Section R301.5 shhll be POST(BEYOND) POST BEYOND EXISTING' C3''•a-o R507.4 Deck posts.For single-level wood-framed decks g g q ' • ( ) / FOUNDATION WALL '�,* "p b' .. �i yrV �I wviG/�� I 0S 73 "' Willi beams sized In accordance with Table R507.5,deck post placement.Deck beam connections Id wood posts shall be permitted. . size shall be In accordance with Table R507.4. In accordance with Figures R507.S.1(!)and R507.5.1{2). : R507.0.2 Lateral cosinectlon.Lateral loads'shall be trans- �----JOIST SPAN PAN MEASURE For sb Ands-25A mum t i Manufactured post-to-beam eounectors:(tall be sized for OPTIONAL CENTERLINE TO CENTER fcrrcd to the ground or to a structure of transmit- OFJOISTHANGERs the post and banm sizes.Bolls shall have washers under CANTILEVER FIGURE R507.0,1,3(2) TABLE R807.4 the head and out. • ling them to the ground.Where the lateral load connection PLACEMENT OF LAG SCREWS AND BOLTS 1N BAND JOIST§ . ✓�' DECK POST HEIGHT' Is provided In accordance with Figure R507,9.2(1),hold- CANTILEVERED JOISTS WITH DROPPED BEAM JOISTS WITH FLUSH BEAM K�Pk�e-6�n•a 4HoY,`/GI• R507,8.1 Decit joist bearing.The ends of Joists shall have MAXIMUM HEIGHT• down tension devices shall be Installed iu not less then two DECK POST SIZE NiM : (fset•Inthos) not less thdb 1/inches(38 mm)of bearing on wood or locations per deck,within 24 inches(610 ruin)of each end ' HW x 4 6-9' metal and not less]hart 3 inches(76 mm)of bearing on FOR CANTILEVERED JOISTS i �`Iw, �a of the deck-)each device shall have en allowable stress 4 x 6 g concrete or masonry over Its entire width.Joists bearing BLOCKING OR OTHER HOLD•DOVIN OR SIMILAR. 6 x 6 14 an top of a.multlple-ply Beom or ledger shall be fastened design capacity of hot lass titan 1,500 pounds(G672 N). LATERAL RESTRAINT , 8 x 8 I4 in accordance with Table R602.3(1).Joists bearing on top Where ilia lateral load connections are provided In actor- REQUIRED OVER BEAM JOIST TENSION DEVICE dance with Figure R507.0.2(2)(he hold-down tension FLdbRSHEATHINGNAILINGAT of a single-ply beam at ledger shall be attached by a ' 01 MAXIMUM ON CENTER TO Fdr SI:I Inch-25A me,I foot-304.8 mm, devices shell be installed in not less llhaa four locations per JOISTWITH HOLD-DOWN : I pound per square foot-0.0479I(N. mechanical connector.Joist framing into Ilia side of a deck,and each device shall have an allowable stress o.Mrororod to die tmdorslda 0l llro beam, beam or ledger board'shall be supported by approved Joist design capacliy of not1ess Ilion 750 pounds(3336 N). ,IphgT JOISTS 1'=' [4"I� PL ��.5 li b.Based on 40 psf llva load: • hangers. :roisr HANGER c.The maximum permluid height Is 8 feat for one-ply and two-ply beams __ -_as BEA1d \-BEAM EACH END157z- I The omxlmmn permitted height for three-ply bananas an post cap Is 6 feel 9 �I__ --p} 301sT' t F + + i• i• : Inche9 �1 I' ''= ^I POST(BEYOND) \�PO87`(BEYONO) ,l, t, ,l, ' R507.4.1 Dealt post to dhck foolingconnection.Where .L.-- --� 111111111111............I I . r posts bear op cocrste footings In acordance with Section .ozA)4 1 P1<nl s R403 and Figure R5t)7.4.1,lateral restraint shall-be pro- •----.:• JOIST SPAN Intsr sPA N taEas Per PoeT OENTERLINE TO CENTERL vided by manufactured connectors or a mintinum post' OPTIONAL OPTIONAL OF JOIST HAN0ER93�embedment of 12 inches(305 min)in surrounding soils or, CANTILEVER CANTILEVER ��Ep,qq- i concrete piers.Other footing systems shall be,penni(ted. 301STS 0 FREE-STANDING DECK JOISTS O EE-ST 10 G DECK. FLOOR JOISTJ DECK JOIST . • 65� 6,GAR Wj%\ : WI DROPPED BEAMITU9H B O Exseptiort:Where expansive;contpresslble,s1tlRing or @�' p O�` % �1 ) 1 otliol quasttonnble s011s are present,surroundklg lolls• c f e a T1'�►w B6AM SPAN aeAM apdN nippaa OIONA�t, BanM sP/W e�►ta etln)Vshell not be relied oD for lateiel suppoll, calira evBR •cAprrnEvaR O"lLk fiF AN RR . FIGURE R607.8 rW•�;TYPICAL DEOK JOIST SPANS �,, ii PROPPED • . FLUSH BEAM - • • O r" '1 `! ® N1 For !Inch 25.4 mm. ?Sin •` II . •- FIGURE R607.s �- 9 ., i TYPICAL DECK JOIST SPANS IGURE R607.9.2(1) 0 ..• I i DECI(ATTAHMENT FOR LATERAL LOADS 11 . - I ;1 i DocuSign Envelope ID:27456EAA-51 FE-4823-ADDB-9151 OCFECE65 R VF i _ Z a � � y �N � a Blind Brook School District U3 L=86.87' S 22"09'Oo" E R=7 2 Q.4 a Chain Link Fence 344.39' Ft •� r b Gravel I}t'i ay R 3 9o,()00 r Q 248162 Sq. Feet � .SZ, F °* tiSt�°0 ?3 �0 Al 42. oy f°sb R Lot 16 4 ' % a ti .N �S zl Aon •4 7� mar, nd �g Richard A. Spinelli �� �� A. Sp 650 Halstead Avenue ��' ��' Survey of Lot 15 Block "L" as shown on "Subdivision Mamaroneck, N. Y. 10543 Map Section Thirteen County Ridge Estates," in the (914) 381—2357 Town of Rye, Westchester ester County, New York. _.: N.Y.S. Lic. Land Surveyor F��. Filed on November 18, 1964 as Map No. 14134 No. 49240 4924o O — -- I LANDScale 1 -=30 September 16, 2021 —Unauthorized additions to or alterations of this S p 2021 � SEP 3 0 . plan is a violation of Section 7209 of the N.Y.S. A _ Education Law. DOCUMENT VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK BUILDING DERAR.TMDJ'r _�...n..� ..,. _ E "COUNRIDCIRCLE"