Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBP21-001EMIT #BPCDATE: 17 I EXP: % 7aoZ SECTION BLOCK I LOT qO TYPE OF WORK ly W YULea Uy� 7A � Patio expo 51617 E .JOB LOCATION_%a r _-- Removif croshnr� OWNER h�cc s.' avy-s_Je1AySa-�s�xvy�l_�-9a�-�a3� CONTRACT EST. COST v/CO # TCO # 1 ZSU� �C)[) FE _FEE )36 t FEE DAT DD INSPECTION REC�O(R�D. FOOTING-- FOUNDATION FRAMING RGH FRAMING INSULATION PLUMBING C7 RGH PLUMBING GAS SPRINKLER Me ELECTRIC LOW -VOLT C� - A LA R M AS BUILT FINAL l000 �IOt� g azejqo f ry ,u r6Dfd ,oPc;))- o 31/l%�Sa la & d %�lu•ti, � •��:l Elul- © 44asor ClPcJor;c S?ryf ces e APPROVALS Mvppber.0 BOT PS ZBA OTHER AS-gUiLTfF1NAt SURVEY REQUIRED PRIOR TO FINAL. INSPECTION VILLAGE+ .OF RYE BROOK WESTCHESTUI2 COUNTY, NEW YORK No: 22-043 Certificate of (Occupaucp This is to certify thatJoshu�_ Show� HPI ).ssa \3ho tv of, R)('e' YI Q , 7 having duly filed an application on a_+00ey- a�, 20 requesting a Certificate of Occupancy for the premises known as, U )3) LO h LW 2 e , Rye Brook,NY, located in a )Q-/5 Zoning District and shown on the most current Tax Map as Section: )35,q 3 Block: Lot: 5, and having fully complied with the requirements of the Building Code and the Zoning Ordinance under Building a1?Permit No. /J Q /, issued 7 20 �V such authority and permission is hereby granted to the property owner to lawfully occupy or use said premises or bu i lding or part thereof listed under the following New York State Classifications,Use: g- - / Construction: =6 , for the following purposes:_ e Y V r-do f ovc,r Lieo r 00h] mo - deck . ne vv oo-Fdor GCazeho Subject to all the privileges, requirements, limitations, and conditions prescribed by law, and subject also to the following: This certificate does not in any way relieve the owners or any person or persons in possession or control of the premises, building,or any part thereof from obtaining such other permits or licenses as may be prescribed by law for the uses or purposes for which the building or premises is designed or intended. Furthermore, it does not relieve such owners or persons from complying with any lawful order issued with the object of maintaining the premises or building in a safe and lawful condition. No changes or rearrangement in the structural parts of the building or in the exit facilities shall be made,and no enlargement, whether by extending on any side or by increasing in height shall be made,nor shall the building be moved from one location to another until a permit to accomplish such change has bp ZI lding Inspector. Building Inspector,Village of Rye Brook: z� Date: MAR 2 2 2022 D E C E N �� For office use onl 0 BUILDII�f � YMENT PERMIT# l-0 0/ OCT 2 7 2021 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK ISSUED: -7-41 938 KING STRECT,RYE BROOK,MW YORK 10573 DATE: /0-a7-ol VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK (914)939-06H FEE: 4 e436-- PAInX BUILDING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY,CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE, AND CERTIFICATION OF FINAL COSTS TO BE SUBMITTED ONLY UPON COMPLETION OF ALL WORK, AND PRIOR TO THE FINAL INSPECTION •rrtrrt►►►►►►►rrrrrr►♦♦t►•rrrq►rt►q►e►•rrtrrttr►t►►►►►►►rttrrrrr►►►►►►►ettratt►►►►►►►►►rt■•rrrt■►►►►►►►►t►trrrtrtrr►ttt►►► Address: Occupancy/Use: /-jC-7,4A Parcel ID#: 1,3,5, A13 J-5. 1/0 Zone: Owner: h'1 SS_G C,n(j t Sh InGt Address: I a- iil,r r is L c-ne P.E./R.A.or Contractor: rc�, ,� S A dress: Q o Person in responsible charge: S G .� F I n l P AddressPt� Z, 5 t o 1 6 U C R�� �-I 5 tj ,� � .,� n `t?�1 Application is hereby made and submitted to the Building Inspector of the Village of Rye Brook for the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy/Certificate of Compliance for the structure/construction/alteration herein mentioned in accordance with law: STATE OF NEWYORK,COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER as: SSG,5 � O r,K � �' G „) being duly sworn,deposes and says that he/she resides at ( �1- 1-� , C K L e, (Print Name of Applicant) (No.and Street) in P (>�(O c� ,in the County of L,-.)e- cC L V�,e c-,-r in the State of N mil,that (city/Town/Village) he/she has supervised the work at the location indicated above,and that the actual total cost of the work,including all site improvements, labor,materials,scaffolding,fixed equipment,professional fees,and including the monetary value of any materials and labor which may have been donated gratis was:$ !�12'oc)o for the construction or alteration of: t'�' t k S f n �i O,h%C t.J o u r do /K, r ✓ ( 0 Deponent further states that he/she has examined the approved plans oWhe structure/work herein referred to for which a Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance is sought,and that to the best of his/her knowledge and belief,the structure/work has been erected/completed in accordance with the approved plans and any amendments thereto except in so far as variations therefore have been legally authorized,and as erected/completed complies with the laws governing building construction.Deponent further understands that it shall be unlawful for an owner to use or permit the use of any building or premises or part thereof hereafter created,erected,changed,converted or enlarged,wholly or partly,in its use or structure until a Certificate of Occupancy or Certificate of Compliance shall have been duly issued by the Building Inspector as per§250-10.A.of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook. Sworn to before me this 0 Sworn to before me this day of ,20 01 day of , 20 Signature of Ptoperiy owner Signature of Applicant t Name of Property Own Print Name of Applicant Notary Public Notary Public SHARI MELILLO Notary Public,State of New York 8/12/2021 No.01 ME6160063 Oualified in Westchester County 3 Commission Expiresry Janua 29,20 �yE BRC�j� 1982 BUILDING DEPARTMENT ❑BUILDING INSPECTOR {❑-•ASSISTANT BUILDING INSPECTOR VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK a`u CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER 938 KING STREET • RYE BROOK,NY 10573 (914) 939-0668 FAX (914) 939-5801 www.ryebrook.org - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INSPECTION REPORT - - - - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - ADDRESS : , ` 1 DATE: ( Zd PERMIT# `.)�J. , N ISSUED: { SECT: �LOCK: / LOT: j } LOCATION: .� �. ,\ t=�"` c—)V.0 1c_.� `�� r'C�. t �1 OCCUPANCY: �\ c ❑ VIOLATION NOTED THE WORK IS... ❑ ACCEPTED ❑ REJECTED/REINSPECTION ❑ SITE INSPECTION REQUIRED ❑ FOOTING ❑ FOOTING DRAINAGE ❑ FOUNDATION ❑ UNDERGROUND PLUMBING NOTES ON INSPECTION: ❑ ROUGH PLUMBING ❑ ROUGH FRAMING ❑ INSULATION ❑ NATURAL GAS ❑ L.P. GAS ❑ FUEL TANK ❑ FIRE SPRINKLER ❑ FINAL PLUMBING ❑ CROSS CONNECTION ❑ FINAL ❑ OTHER QyE BRCb,,�. cu � Fo 1982 BUILDING DEPARTMENT Q BUILDING INSPECTOR ASSISTANT BUILDING INSPECTOR VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK ❑CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER 938 KING STREET • RYE BROOK,NY 10573 (914) 939-0668 FAx (914) 939-5801 www.ryebrook.org - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - INSPECTION REPORT - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - ADDRESS:- f ,�� 4 _ I .�.�) DATE: b PERMIT# ��`/�' ISSUED: SECT:` y, 0 BLOCK: LOT: LOCATION: r 1 V CCUPANCY: ❑ VIOLATION NOTED THE WORK IS... ❑ ACCEPiiD ❑ IECTED/REINSPECTION ❑ SITE INSPECTION l REQUIRED ❑ FOOTING ❑ FOOTING DRAINAGE U ❑ FOUNDATION ❑ UNDERGROUND PLUMBING NOTES ON INSPECTION: ❑ ROUGH PLUMBING ❑ ROUGH FRAMING ❑ INSULATION _ t ❑ NATURALGAS ❑ L.P. GAS D ❑ FUEL TANK ❑ FIRE SPRINKLER ❑ FINAL PLUMBING ❑ CROSS CONNECTION ,p�-FINAL ❑ OTHER �E BRC�k, • 1982 BUILDING DEPARTMENT ❑DBUILDING INSPECTOR IQASSISTANT BUILDING INSPECTOR VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK Ff��J CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER 938 KING STREET - RYE BROOK,NY 10573 (914) 939-0668 FAX (914) 939-5801 www.aebrook.org - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INSPECTION REPORT - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ADDRESS : DATE: "l t PERMIT# J �� ISSUED: t SECT: BLOCK: LOT: LOCATION: � `' ` •� OCCUPANCY: Z I ❑ VIOLATION NOTED THE WORK IS... Q /ACCEPTED ❑ REJECTED/REINSPECTION ❑ SITE INSPECTION REQUIRED ❑ FOOTING ❑ FOOTING DRAINAGE ❑ FOUNDATION ❑ UNDERGROUND PLUMBING NOTES ON INSPECTION: ❑ ROUGH PLUMBING ❑ ROUGH FRAMING 1 ` Z`ksI f ❑ INSULATION U f 'NATURAL GAS v• �e�Yl ' t �C %❑ L.P. GAS ❑ FUEL TANK ( , ❑ FIRE SPRINKLER ❑ FINAL PLUMBING ❑ CROSS CONNECTION ❑ FINAL ❑ OTHER �E MaP O� Zm BUILDING DEPARTMENT ❑BUILDING INSPECTOR lm;!(SSISTANT BUILDING INSPECTOR VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK ❑CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER 938 KING STREET - RYE BROOK,NY 10573 (914) 939-0668 FAX (914) 939-5801 www.ryebrook.org - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INSPECTION REPORT - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ADDRESS: < <� �.Gr DATE: , �20-z� PERMIT# 'mot_) oo, ISSUED: �'y'` SECT: BLOCK: LOT: LOCATION: -_�� OCCUPANCY: ❑ VIOLATION NOTED THE WORK IS... C� ACCEPTED ❑ REJECTED/ REINSPECTION ❑ SITE INSPECTION REQUIRED W FOOTING ','?rx- ❑ FOOTING DRAINAGE u ❑ FOUNDATION ❑ UNDERGROUND PLUMBING NOTES ON INSPECTION: ❑ ROUGH PLUMBING ❑ ROUGH FRAMING ❑ INSULATION ` 1 ❑ NATURAL GAS �P � \ ❑ L.P. GAS G lck\ �� •� � ❑ FUEL TANK ❑ FIRE SPRINKLER ❑ FINAL PLUMBING ❑ CROSS CONNECTION ❑ FINAL ❑ OTHER BUILD MENT p V VIL E OF RY OK I 938 KING �" ET RYE BR NY 10573 FEB 2 6 2021 (914)9 8 9 39-5801 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK BUILDING DEPARTMENT *********************************************************************************************************** FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: �! Approval Date: MAY 2 6 201 Permit# Application# Approval Signature: ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD: Disapproved: Date: MAY 1 u 2WI BOT Approval Date: Case# Chairman: n PB Approval Date: Case# Secretary: ZBA Approval Date: 6 Z( Case# Other: Amendment Fee: ' — 1/Permit Fee: Lc->& APPL TO AMEND APPROVED PLANS Application dated: e� Q1 is hereby made to the Building Inspector of the Village of Rye Brook,NY,to amend the approved plans associated with an existing open ennit,and/or from any prior)approvals granted by the approval authority as per detailed statement described below. 1. Job Address: n'e' Existing Permit#: O t 2. Parcel ID#: 3S.L}3 — I — S• 1 O Zone: R ' S Original Approval Date: I �-t 3. Proposed Amendment(Describe in detail): n-e.w �yy 1 c,L. S ltrV.lec„t +t (R-ooF 'DQk,, ova 6?lir4- o F propa;-ey A00f, Gl /ta Arz, 4. Property Owner: tJ a- 1t Q,l&j Address: i� ieon �- an 4- A R 16-or,1Gi f-A y.s-7 3 Phone# Cell# (90) 9 ZZ— 1 1 e-mail n5{4g ui8,& eGmkrc,ca,,, Applicant: Address: Phone# Cell# e-mail Architect/Engineer: C _Aja&e�i'B 1-<. Address: 33 M P � /� Phone# (7/4 ?3— 73Sb Cell# e-mail SLCurlc,-1oLn6i/ 14 5. Occupancy,(I-Fam.,2-Fam.,Comm.,etc...)Prior to construction: 1,4 After construction: it g 6. Will the proposed amendment require the installation of new,or an extension/modification to an existing automatic fire suppression system?(Fire Sprinkler,ANSL System,FM-200 System,Type I Hood,etc...)Yes: No:_X_(if yes,you must submit a separate Automatic Fire Suppression System Permit application&2 sets of detailed engineered plans) 7. Will the proposed amendment disturb 400 sq. ft. or more of land,or create 400 sq.ft.or more of impervious coverage requiring a Storm water Management Control Permit as per§217 of Village Code?Yes:_No:2L Area: i 3/21/19 8. Will the proposed amendment require a Site Plan Review by the Village Planning Board as per§209 of Village Code? Yes: No:_/(if yes,you must submit a Site Plan Application,&provide detailed drawings) 9. Will the proposed amendment require a Steep Slopes Permit as per§213 of Village Code Yes: No: k (ifyes,you mustsubmit a Site Plan Application,&provide a detailed topographical survey) 10. Is tiie lot located within 100 ft of a Weiland as per§245 of Village Code? Yes: No: of (if yes,the area of wetland and the wetland buffer zone must be properly depicted on the survey&site plan) IL Is the lot or any portion thereof located in a Flood Plane as per the FIRM Map dated 9/28/07? Yes: No: X (if yes,the area and elevations of the flood plane must be properly depicted on the survey&site plan) 12. Will the proposed amendment require a Tree Removal Permit as per§235 of Village Code?Yes: No: K (if yes,you must submit a Tree Removal Permit Application) 13. Does the proposed amendment involve a Home-Occupation as per§250-38 of Village Code? Yes: No: Y, If yes,indicate: TIER I: TIER 1I: TIER III: (if yes,a Home Occupation Permit Application is required) 14. Will the proposed amendment result in additional square footage to the building or subject structure,and if so,provide such additional footage here. (Please submit additional Bulk Regulation Application Pages for review) 15. What is the total added cost of the work associated with the amendment: $ ] U"00C (The estimated cost shall include all site improvements, labor, material, scaffolding, fixed equipment,professional fees, including any material and labor which may be donated gratis.) 16. N.Y. State Construction Classification: tT N.Y.State Use Classification: (e-T 17. Estimated date of completion: This application must be properly completed in its entirety by a N.Y. State Registered Architect or N.Y. State Licensed Professional Engineer&signed by those professionals where indicated. It must also include the notarized signature(s)of the legal owner(s) of the subject property, and the applicant of record in the spaces provided.Any application not properly completed in its entirety and/or not properly signed shall be deemed null and void,and will be returned to the applicant. Please note that application fees are non-refundable. STATE OF NEW YOM COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER ) as: J—Z�)h G 5 1 , ,being duly sworn,deposes and states that he/she is the applicant above named, (print name or individual signing as the applicant) and further statesthat (s)he is the legal owner of the property to which this application pertains, or that (s)he is the for the legal owner and is duly authorized to make and file this application. (indicate architect,contractor,agent,attorney,etc.) That all statements contained herein are true to tine best of his/her knowledge and belief,and that any work performed,or use conducted at the above captioned property will be in conformance with the details as set forth and contained in this application and in any accompanying approved plans and specifications,as well as in accordance with the New York State Uniform Fire Prevention&Building Code,the Code ofthe Village of Rye Brook and all other applicable laws,ordinances and regulations.By signing this application,the property owner further declares that he/she has inspected the subject property,and that to the best of his/her knowledge there are no roof drains,sump pumps or other prohibited stormwater or groundwater connections or sources of infiltration into the sanitary sewer system on or from the subject property. Sworn to before me this Sworn to before me this day of February 26 , 2020 day of Z , 20 Z,, 4 Signature of Property Owner mature of pp scant Josh Shaw Print Name of Property Owner Print Name of Applicant Notary Public Notary Public 2 3/21/19 BUILD MENT D �� Do VIL OF RX.. OOK V 938 KING Ei, RYI BR NY 10573 DEC 2 0 2021 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK BUILDING DEPARTMENT FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: Approval Date: JAN 2 0 202 ermit t c Application# Approval Signature: ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD: Disapproved: : Date: JAN 1 2022 BOT Approval Date: Case# Chairman: PB Approval Date: Case# Secretary: ZBA Approval Date: Case# Other: Amendment Fee:Vc N� Permit Fee: APPLICATION TO AMEND APPROVED PLANS Application dated: lC;)—'pV a/ is hereby made to the Building Inspector of the Village of Rye Brook,NY, to amend the approved plans associated with an existing open permit,and/or from any prior approvals granted by the approval authority as per detailed statement described below. 1. Job Address: 2 b l r c, o,ne, Existing Permit#: &")j—00) 2. Parcel ID#: `�) 5, 43- — S• 4o Zone: 15 Original Approval Date: 7 01 3. Proposed Amendment(Describe in detail): wort" szo 'Ie-.II✓ { 4,,�(--1 N q 4. Property Owner: �oSn U C� an x) M Q 1 t.)5 0. '51A Auj Address: { },L� I�73 Phone# Cell# 017) C/Z2 — 1 Z 3/ e-mail M 5 AQ�d�n`�'Cy�'►[uL,w,,,� Applicant: Address: Phone# Cell# e-mail Architect/Engineer: y'--�a11rN S C L LJrL Address: 1)12;, � ArkNll\, `{_13 Phone# Cell# e-mail CSC Lr'I" r" 5. Occupancy; (I-Faro.,2-Fam.,Comm.,etc...)Prior to construction: ' m After construction: / 14*j^J y 6. Will the proposed amendment require the installation of a new,or an extension/modification to an existing automatic fire suppression system?(Fire Sprinkler,ANSL System,FM-200 System,Type I Hood,etc...)Yes: No:x(if yes,you must submit a separate Automatic Fire Suppression System Permit application&2 sets of detailed engineered plans) 7. Will the proposed amendment disturb 400 sq.ft.or more of land,or create 400 sq.ft.or more of impervious coverage requiring a Storm water Management Control Permit as per§217 of Village Code?Yes: No: X Area: no chahy-�. �'�'�ru0�rwc. �yp�-1«trnar� 8/12/2021 8. Will the proposed amendment require a Site Plan Review by the Village Planning Board as per§209 of Village Code? Yes:_No:✓ (if yes,you must submit a Site Plan Application,&provide detailed drawings) 9. Will the proposed amendment require a Steep Slopes Permit as per§213 of Village Code Yes: No: l�(if yes,you must submit a Site Plan Application,&provide a detailed topographical survey) 10. Is the lot located within 100 ft of a Wetland as per§245 of Village Code? Yes: No: ✓(if yes,the area of wetland and the wetland buffer zone must be properly depicted on the survey&site plan) 11. is the lot or any portion thereof located in a Flood Plane as per the FIRM Map dated 9/28/07? Yes: No; (if yes,tlhe area and elevations of the flood plane must be properly depicted on the survey&site plan) 12, Will the proposed amendment require a Tree Removal Permit as per§235 of Village Code?Yes: No`.� (ifyes,you must submit a Tree Removal Permit Application) 13. Does the proposed amendment involve a Home-Occupation as per§250-38 of Village Code? Yes: No: ✓ifyes,indicate: TIER I; TiER iI: TIER III: (if yes,a Home Occupation Permit Application is required) 14. Will the proposed amendment result in additional square footage to the building or subject structure, and if so, provide such additional footage here. Yl D CAmn2-L ne'"-r - oYT-�CG n-+L r-I LJhy (Please submit additional Bulk Regulation Application Pages for review) 15. What is the total added cost of the work associated with the amendment: $ M C-054- 9l 4-Pexuvtc,.& (The estimated cost shall include all site improvements,labor,material,scaffolding,fixed equipment,professional fees,including any material and labor which may be donated gratis.) 16. N.Y.State Construction Classification: N.Y. State Use Classification: -Z- 17. Estimated date of completion: This application must be properly completed in its entirety by a N.Y.State Registered Architect or N.Y. State Licensed Professional Engineer&signed by those professionals where indicated. It must also include the notarized signature(s) of the legal owner(s)of the subject property,and the applicant of record in the spaces provided.Any application not properly completed in its entirety and/or not properly signed shall be deemed null and void, and will be returned to the applicant. Please note that application fees are non-refundable. STATE OF NEW YORK,COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER ) as: G -0*.)Cs r(a.4 t/ ,being duly sworn,deposes and states that he/she is the applicant above named, (print name of individual signing as die applicant) and further states that (s)he is the legal owner of the property to which this application pertains, or that (s)he is the � -� for the legal owner and is duly authorized to make and file this application. (i dicate architect,contractor,agent,atlomey,etc.) That all statements contained herein are true to the best of his/her knowledge and belief,and that any work performed,or use conducted at the above captioned property will be in conformance with the details as set forth and contained in this application and in any accompanying approved plans and specifications,as well as in accordance with the New York State Uniform Fire Prevention&Building Code,the Code of the Village of Rye Brook and all other applicable laws,ordinances and regulations.By signing this application,the property owner further declares that he/she has inspected the subject property,and that to the best of his/her knowledge there are no roof drains,sump pumps or other prohibited stormwater or groundwater connections or sources of infiltration into the sanitary sewer system on or from the subject property. Sworn to before me this V-1 _ Sworn to before me this day of -Q� - , 20 c2 day Signs re roperty wner / ignatur App ica in G j t Namc of Pra y O\v�ner�,� &rintme of Applicant Notary Public Public Z SHARI MELILLO SHARI MELILLO Notary Public, State of New York Notary Public, State of New York No. 01'MF616f,?1163 No. 01,,,_61 tr S3 Qua''.fied in Westch,ster County Q�ta,'fied in Wcstch.:ter County/y Commission Exr)ires January 2.9,202a Commission Expires Janu2r\,,29.20 -� 8/12/2021 i N p ' C rq N N y cc E- `r' � PLO z ci 0 w ,., w • r�r. ico f W 3 O Q U o� a 3 C • , cL -4 ra 000 C! 3 Z' 3 >1.0 Q�o O L u16 toz : = •• � y, Z N G z (� C < a c ' .. a. W wrA a. oc QI m 0a, .41 ZI m fi = vei BUILDING DEPARTMENT VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK J A N 2 1 2,C211 938 KING STREET RYE BROOK,NY 10573 (914)939-0668 FAX(914)939-5801 www.ryebrook.org ELECTRICAL PERMIT APPLICATION Westchester County Master Electricians License Required 1 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY BP#: EP #: d aO Approval Date: JAN 2 5 1021 Permit Fee: $ ! Approval Signature: Other: Disapproved: (fees are non-refundable) Application dated, O I ZOZ I is hereby made to the Building Inspector of the Village of Rye Brook NY, for the issuance of a Permit to install and/or remove electrical equipment, wiring, fixtures ,or to perform other high or low voltage electrical work as per the detailed statement described below. The applicant & property owner, by signing this document agree that all electrical work performed will be in conformance with all applicable Federal, State,County and Local Codes. I.Address: 1 Z B 1 rt h La L- SBL: qo Zone: 2.Property Owner:S( ?} a 1; lU III 601,1 f Address: 12 Ai&V1 W, RN Book N V 115�.3 Phone#: Cell#: 713-9ZZ-I Z 3 I email: Ms\1Uw a W j�. �4 Y 3.Master Electrician:"(/S1C1Vp QrQI/1 O- 500C A I Address: 131 �Elkr,yyl trU� N�1U a14, /!U 4. f4 Lic.#: I Z Z Phone#: 9l y -S&S-27 91) Cell#: N- SbS- 77l0 email: LA-ray FIELT6L LLC(?I/j„dWj I, 40-W, Company Name: LaSee FLt_CILL .5eYu\c&<, Address: 13�lln�w► A l:ltl a,lb �IY 02-5- 4.Proposed Electrical Work/Fixture Count: (fo rt iyyI To-,r *cw outdmr K iT dg yi ********************************************************************************************************* STATE OF NEW YORK,COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER ) as: ,being duly sworn,deposes and states that he/she is the applicant above named,and does further (print name of individual signing as the applicant) state that(s)he is the legal owner of the property to which this application pertains,or that(s)he is the for the legal owner and is duly authorized to make and file this application. (indicate architect,contractor,agent,attornev,etc.) The undersigned further states that all statements contained herein are true to the best of his/her knowledge and belief,and that any work performed,or use conducted at the above captioned property will be in conformance with the details as set forth and contained in this application and in any accompanying approved plans and specifications,as well as in accordance with the New York State Uniform Fire Prevention&Building Code,the Code of the Village of Rye Brook and all other applicable laws,ordinances and regulations. Sworn to before me this Sworn to before me this day of 20 day of ,20 r '4— Signature of Property(Owner Signature �Applio ..t 4 Prmt Name of Property Owner Print Name of Applicant Notary Public Notary Public znvio Westchester Rockland Electrical Inspection Services, Inc��XAFI' hone: 914-347-3595DO NOT WRITE HERE-FOR OFFICE USE ONLY 43 North Lawn Avenue Fax: 914-347-3596 Elmsford NY 10523 BUILDING PERMIT NO. TEMP# DATE , CITY OR VILLAGE ZIP CODE _ TOWNSHIP COUNTY e STREET AND NO.OR R AD POLE NUMBER 12 I YC Ul l_V\ BETWEEN WHAT TWO CROSS STREETS IS PREMISES LOCATED? SECTION BLOCK LOT OCCUPANT'S NAME BUI NG OCCUPANCY 5 U OWNER'S NAME AND ADDRESS fM I TELEPHONE NUMBER CURRENT SUPPLIED BY FROM THEIR OFFICE WORK TELEPHONE NUMBER LIST BELOW ALL EQUIPMENT WHICH YOU INSTALLED NUMBER OF OUTLETS NO.OF FIXTURES& MOTORS HEATERS OFFICE USE LOCATION LAMP RECEPTACLES ONLY SIDEWALL SWITCH INCADE FLUORE NO. H.P.EACH NO. WATTS EACH INSPECTION OUTSIDE BASEMENT If FL 2M0 FL. 3-FL. REMARKS:LIST OTHER ELECTRICAL DEVICES NOT SET FORTH ABOVE: 1�U Y u A oo( I1-0 c ke vt THIS APPLICATION IS INTENDED TO COVER THE ABOVE LISTED ITEMS TO BE INSPECTED. IF AT ANY TIME OF INSPECTION ADDITIONAL ITEMS RAVE BEEN INSTALLED,YOU ARE AUTHORIZED TO MAKE THE INSPECTION AND ADJUST THE FEE FOR THE ADDITIONAL ITEMS INSPECTED AS PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT.THE APPUCANT DECLARES THAT THERE IS NO OPEN APPLICATIONS FOR THE ABOVE WITH ANY OTHER INSPECTION COMPANY.WREIS,INC.IS NOT LISTING,LABELING,UNDERWRITING OR CERTIFYING ANY EQUIPMENT, MATERIALS OR DEVICES WHICH ARE PERFORMED BY OTHER CERTIFIED TESTING AGENCIES OR INSPECTION COMPANIES.THE APPLICANT,OWNER,OR AUTHORIZED AGENT AGREES TO ALL THE ABOVE TERMS AND CONDITIONS AS SET FORTH FOR THE APPLICATION. SIZE OF SERVICE FEEDERS CHARACTER OF WORK NEW❑ ADDITIONAL❑ EXPOSED❑ CONCEALED❑ MUST ENTER APPLICANTS IDENTIFICATION NUMBER SERVICE ENTERS BUILDING OVERHEAD n UNDERGROUND❑ AVOID DELAYS BY GIVING FULL AND ACCURATE INFORMATION.ALL SPACE MUST BE FILLED IN OR APPLICATION MAY BE RETURNED. NAME OF COMPANY DATE OF APPLICATION SIGNATURE O JLPPLICA GA5t K K�� SErv�ct d f4S ��Za X ;! . STREET ADDRESS TELEPHONE NO. /Y. 13 'l6M1vd s�� - Zz CRY OR POST OFFICE nl tie LICENSE NO.WHEN APPLICABLE ( GL �, WESTCHESTER ROCKLAND VNE111 ELECTRICAL INSPECTION SERVICES.INC. BY THIS CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE THE Westchester Rockland Electrical Inspection Services 43 North Lawn Ave, Elmsford, NY 10523 914-347-3595 (Office) 1 914-347-3596 (Fax) CERTIFIES THAT Upon the application of: Upon premises owned by: Laser Electric Services Joshua &Melissa Shaw 137 Pelham Road NY, New Rochelle 10805 Located at: 12 Birch Lane Rye Brook, NY 10573 Certificate Number: 1029166 Section: 135.43 Block: 1 Lot: 5.40 BDC: Permit Number:EP:21-020-BP:21-001 A visual inspection of the electrical system at this premise described as a Residential occupancy,wherein the premises electrical system consisting of electrical devices and wiring,described below,located in/on the premises at: 12 Birch Lane Rye Brook,NY 10573 Basement 1st Floor 2nd Floor 3rd Floor Garage AtticOutside Other: Inspection was conducted in accordance with the NYS and NFPA 70-2017 International Electrical Code and detail of the installation,as set forth below,was found to be in compliance therewith on 08/10/21 Name Type Quantity Fixture-Luminaire Recessed ------- 23 Ceiling Paddle Fan ------- 2 Heater ------- 4 Switch Single Pole ------ 8 Refrigerator Mini 1 Barbeque ------- 1 Receptacle;Outdoor GFI ------- 4 Cable Homeruns ------- 2 Fixture-Wall Sconce Outdoor ------- 2 Sub Panel 100 amps 1 This Certificate has been approved by Westchester Rockland Electrical Inspection Services. This certificate may not be altered in any way. �r—`��L This certificate is valid for work performed before date of inspection only. 0 a M M N CC a � a F C ��RflI1M N N. IF, �/ z z cy s • wcy1 (COO - W w A � oc Q O pW OMEN plow aQd o - f .. a o p EC EWE BUILDING DEPARTMENT VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK MAR 11 2021 938 KING STREET RYE BROOK,NY 10573 (914)939-0668FAx(914)939-5801 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK BUILDING DEPARTMENT PLUMBING PERMIT APPLICATION FOR OFFICE USE ONLY BP#: p2/ — UU PP #: 3 Approval Date: MAR 1 2021 Permit Fee: $ 1 '7S- A1_`*3 Approval Signature: �' Other: Disapproved: (fees are non-refundable) Application dated, is hereby made to the Building Inspector of the Village of Rye Brook NY, for the issuance of a Permit to install and/or remove Plumbing as per detailed statement described below.The applicant&property owner,by signing this document agree that said plumbing work will be in conformance with all applicable Federal,Stahel,County and Local Codes. O 1.Address: `r R)fCk \ky\t S�BL: /.3 5r j, 73 '��-- `10 zone:I�—/5 2.Proposed Work: Ov C&S `�h ��Eb r F'Wfb­'- W L 3.Property Owner:_Tj, r,�y (A MtiKSa Address: &1kuh t Phone#: 14 4 Z-�ci Cell#: email: 4.Master Plumber: C�bLf Sak(tZaC Address:31;L, C65ThoT- kN t t AA, 03-. K1Sto ki IOS Lic.#: 1:50 q Phone#: Cell#:q l Y ),1 Y-S Y-L j email: 501 aZA rPJ1 u►+l b 1'h�r(K k�t4!pq(,&w X Company Name:Sa�aZc+,e f•r \A I nX Address:3)L CkeSThy'T- K1i �4 ktr-riik to � 10S�4 INDICATE FIXTURES&LINES TO BE INSTALLED AS PER THE FOLLOWING SCHEDULE: Location Water Urinals Drinking Sinks Showers Bath Laundry Domestic Fire Sanitary Natural/ Other" Total Closets Fountains Tubs Tubs Service Service Sewer LP Gas Basement 1st Floor 2nd Floor 31 Floor 4 Floor 51 Floor Exterior 5.*List Other Equipment/Provide Details: Oyu 6 kST Ivtg q�s k,.(_ Foy- "CCde . (Notarized Signatures Required Next 2 Pages) -1- 3/21/19 STATE'-OF N(EWj YOM COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER ) as: ram^ZL(C,�YA ,being duly sworn,deposes and states that he/she is the applicant above named, (print name of individual signing as the applicant) and further states that(s)he is the legal owner of the property to which this application pertains,or that(s)he is the Unji -aCip r for the legal owner and is duly authorized to make and file this application. (indicate architect,contractor,agent,attorney,etc.) That all statements contained herein are true to the best of his/her knowledge and belief,and that any work performed,or use conducted at the above captioned property will be in conformance with the details as set forth and contained in this application and in any accompanying approved plans and specifications,as well as in accordance with the New York State Uniform Fire Prevention&Building Code,the Code of the Village of Rye Brook and all other applicable laws,ordinances and regulations. Sworn to before me this Q Swom to before me this 10 day of rh _,20_ai_ day of m ai-ch 20 Q-1 _ Signature of Property Owner Signa 1' Print Name of Property Owner Print Name of Applicant 4aet4a SULEYMA B SALAZAR L_ZVil ��&' � NOTARY PUBLIC-STATE OF NEW YORK No 01 SA6379344 Notary Notary Public lic Qualified in Westchester County SULEYMA B SALAZAR NOTARY PUBLIC-STATE OF NEW YORK My Commission Expires 96-13-2022 No 01SA6379344 Qualified in Westchester County This application must be properly completed in its entirety and must include tl1"�'19M&W9igTlat"*)DE022 the legal owner(s) of the subject property, and the applicant of record in the spaces provided. Applications not properly completed in its entirety and/or not properly signed shall be deemed null and void and will be returned to the applicant. -2- 3/21/19 ♦ BUILDING DEPARTMENT D `E C IE " " E I VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK MAR 1 1 2021 938 KING STREET RYE BROOK,NY 10573 (914)939-0668_W(914)939-5801 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK ww .. ok.oEg BUILDING DEPARTMENT AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE VILLAGE CODE §216 ESTORM SEWERS AND SANITARY SEWERS THIS AFFIDAVIT MUST BEAR THE NOTARIZED SIGNATURE OF THE LEGAL PROPERTY OWNER AND BE SUBMITTED ALONG WITH ANY BUILDING OR PLUMBING PERMIT APPLICATION. ANY BUILDING OR PLUMBING PERMIT APPLICATION SUBMITTED WITHOUT THIS COMPLETED AND NOTARIZED FORM WILL BE RETURNED TO THE APPLICANT. STATE OF NEW YOM COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER ) as: e) O��Qj, S�c`'� � 71-0(KCi g`, residing at, 1 B)J-Ch l4vt e (Print name) iddress NNhere you lii c; being duly sworn, deposes and states that (s)he is the applicant above named, and further states that (s)he is the legal owner of the property to which this Affidavit of Compliance pertains at; tFI ►'� , Rye Brook, NY. Further that all statements contained herein are true, and that to the best of his/her knowledge and belief, that there are no known illegal cross-connections concerning either the storm sewer or sanitary sewer, and further that there are no roof drains, sump pumps, or other prohibited stormwater or groundwater connections or sources of inflow or infiltration of any kind into the sanitary sewer from the subject property in accordance with all State, County and Village Codes. (�i�naturr,,CP � ner(s)) TO 5L C' & M6%`SSci SLcwv' (Print Name of Property Owner(s)) Sworn to before me this 10 day of NAct rc h' 20QI (Notary Public) SULEYMA B SALAZAR NOTARY PUBLIC-STATE OF NEW YORK No 01SA6379344 Qualified in Westchester County _3_ My Commission expires 08-13-2022 3/21/19 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS NOV - 5 2020 RESOLUTION VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE WHEREAS,application has been made to the Zoning Board by Joshua Shaw & Melissa Shaw (the "Applicants") for a rear yard setback variance of 14 feet where the minimum required rear yard setback is 40 feet pursuant to Village Code § 250-20.G(3), in connection with the proposed construction of a new roof over rear patio, new outdoor kitchen, patio expansion and removal of existing gazebo, on property located at 12 Birch Lane, in an R-15 zoning district on the South side of Birch Lane, approximately 290 feet from the intersection of Old Orchard Road and Birch Lane. Said premises being known and designated on the tax map of the Village of Rye Brook as Parcel ID# 135.43-1-5.40; and WHEREAS,a duly advertised public hearing was held November 4, 2020, at which time all those wishing to be heard were given such opportunity; and WHEREAS,the public hearing was closed on November 4, 2020; and WHEREAS,the proposed action is a Type II action pursuant to the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act and accordingly, no further environmental review is required; and WHEREAS, the Board, from the application, after viewing the premises and neighborhood concerned, and upon considering each of the factors set forth at Section 250-13(G)(b)[2][a]-[e] of the Rye Brook Code, finds: 1) The variance [WILL NOT] create an adverse impact to the character of the neighborhood; 2) The benefit the Applicants seek [CANNOT]be achieved through another method,feasible for the Applicants to pursue, that does not require the variance; 3) The variance [IS] substantial; 4) The variance [WILL NOT] create any adverse impacts to the physical or environmental conditions of the neighborhood; and 5) The need for the variance [IS] self-created. 1313/08/716896v1 1115120 -1- NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED that the said application for a rear yard setback variance of 14 feet where the minimum required rear yard setback is 40 feet pursuant to Village Code § 250-20.G(3), is hereby [GRANTED] on the following conditions: 1) No permit or certificate of occupancy shall be issued until the Applicants have paid in full all application and consultant fees incurred by the Village in connection with the review of this application. 2) 3) Dated: November 4, 2020 Don Moscato Mr. Don Moscato, Chairman Mr. Moscato called the roll: Steven Berger Voting: _x_Aye Nay Abstain Glenn Brettschneider Voting: _x_Aye Nay Abstain Jamie Schutzer Voting: _x_Aye Nay Abstain Joel Simon Voting: _x_Aye Nay Abstain Don Moscato Voting: x_Aye Nay Abstain _5_Ayes _0_Nays Abstain 1313/08/716896v1 1115120 -2- cc, y�j✓ tr' /�-�902•T VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK MAYOR 938 King Street, Rye Brook, N.Y. 10573 ADMINISTRATOR Paul S Rosenberg (914) 939-0668 Fax (914) 939-5801 Christopher J Bradbury N%%.n ebrook.or2 TRUSTEES BUILDING & FIRE Susan R Epstein INSPECTOR Stephanie J Fischer Michael J Izzo David M Heiser Jason A Klein NOTICE OF HEARING ON APPLICATION Rotice is hereby given that the undersigned has filed an application to appear before the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Rye Brook. Application # 20-018 :applicant: Joshua Shaw & Melissa Shaw 12 Birch Lane Rye Brook, New York 10573 Applicant Proposes to: Construct nee% roof over rear patio, nuNN outdoor kitchen, patio expansion and remove existing gazebo. At the premises known as 12 Birch Lane in the Village of Rye Brook,New York,situated on the South side of Birch Lane, approximately 290 feet from the intersection of Old Orchard Road and Birch Lane, designated and shown on the most current tax map as Parcel ID# 135.43-1-5.40,the applicant does hereby request a variance(s) from the following applicable section(s)of the Zoning Ordinance: § 250-20.G. (3) The minimum required rear yard setback is 40 feet. The proposed patio roof will result in a rear yard setback of 26 feet. Therefore a rear yard setback variance of 14 feet is requested. 21 public hearing on said application will be held before the Village Zoning Board of Appeals on Tuesday, November 4,2020, at 8 o'clock p.m. at the Village of Rye Brook Offices located at 938 King Street, Rye Brook, NY 10573. Plans and other materials associated with the proposed application may be reviewed and downloaded via the Meetings/Agendas link from the Rye Brook website homepage, and are available for review at the Building Department. The November 4, 2020 Zoning Board of Appeals meeting will be held N is videoconferencing and in- person,if permitted by the Governor's Executive Orders. The public �%ill have an opportunity to see and hear the meeting live and provide comments. Further information on in-person attendance, if permitted,will be available on the Village%s ch%ite. The public can watch the live meeting on Cable TV, online from the Public Meetings link on the Village website (www.rvebrook.ore), and through the Zoom App. If any interested members of the public 'Aould like to provide comments on an application, comments can be called in during the meeting at+1 (929)205-6099,Meeting ID: 895 1214 2932 or provided through the written chat section of the Zoom meeting. Comments can also be provided via email before and during the meeting to Michael Izzo,Village Building Inspector,at mizzo(a rvebrook.orQ. Please check the meeting Agenda posted on the Village website for further instructions to access the virtual meeting and for updated information. Plans and other materials associated with the proposed application may be reviewed and downloaded via the Public Meetings link from the Rye Brook website. Dated: 1 G" 7"zeu ax Christopher J. Bradt;r erk �y ti 0 t`y woy yJ V y�44 VUy VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK MAYOR 938 King Street, Rye Brook, N.Y. 10573 ADMINISTRATOR Paul S. Rosenberg (914) 939-0668 Fax(914)939-5801 Christopher J. Bradbury www.rvebrook.ore TRUSTEES BUILDING&FIRE Susan R. Epstein INSPECTOR Stephanie J. Fischer Michael J. Izzo David M. Heiser Jason A. Klein NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL Application # 20-016 September 15, 2020 Joshua Shaw& Melissa Shaw 12 Birch Lane Rye Brook,New York 10573 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that your application for building permit dated, September 3, 2020, for the premises located at 12 Birch Lane, Parcel ID# 135.43-1-5.40, has been disapproved because of non- compliance with the following section(s)of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook: § 250-20.G. (3) The minimum required rear yard setback is 40 feet. The proposed patio roof will result in a rear yard setback of 26 feet. Please revise your plans to fully comply with the applicable section(s) of Village Code, or an appeal to this decision may be brought before the Village Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA) in accordance with §250-13 and §250-40 of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook. Applications to appear before the ZBA are available at the Building Department or online at www.Eyebrook.org. Sincerely, Michael J. Izzo Building& Fire Inspector mizzoa,[yebrook.org BUILDIDTIMENT (� ��J (�VILL OOK D 1ECEF VL�R 3 SEP 18 2020 PHONE(914)914) 939-5801 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK BUILDING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION TO THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Application Fee: $350.00 (Vl'*p*aid Escrow Fee: S1,000.00 ( aid Date: Subject Property: r C-µ Parcel ID#: 1_3,sa 43— ( - 5-4 00 ryZone: A-/S Property Owner:3p S&ci- $ MQ.l..i SScL `�t4Q j j Address: 7. •6C r ck Phone#: Cell 49 -71) ZZ�'"�/- email:�Y1 �pY(yd(� P 6,MA.I L,C aP� Applicant: �hn (, 5�,r-( c� 1�1 t� Address: 33 1> > OZ1n6, JC Mn-4 Phone#: '9 ( ) Z7 3' 7 3 Cell �9/¢) 7/4— 0) Ste- email J&SC ar(" 66 pia l cic n�,, Attorney/Agent: ` Address: Phone#: Cell #: email: The applicant named herein does hereby request an appeal from the decision made by the Building Inspector on an application dated 0'7 1 S , 20 Zo , whereby the Building Inspector did: Grant: ( ) /Deny: (L�' the applicant a permit for 1. Type of Appeal: (✓fVariance to the Zoning Ordinance ( )Interpretation of the Zoning Ordinance ( ) Certification for Continuation of a Nonconforming Use ( ) Permit for Occupancy ( ) Permit for Use 2. This application relates to: ( )Use ( )Area ( )Height (vfSetback ( )Other: In connection with: ( )A Proposed Building ( )An Existing Building 3. Previous Appeal(s); ( )Have (Have Not been made with respect to this particular decision of the Building Inspector, and ( )Have ( )Have Not been made with respect to any other previous decision(s) made by the Building Inspector regarding the subject property. List All Previous Zoning Appeals Either Granted or Denied Concerning the Subiect Property a. A requested variance was ( )Granted/( )Denied on application# dated, for, b. A requested variance was ( )Granted/( )Denied on application# dated, for, c. A requested variance was ( )Granted/( )Denied on application# dated, for, t (Use additional sheets if necessary) 3/21/19 4. Alteration: If work constitutes an alteration or extension to an existing building, describe briefly: Hew 6 ezar F—Da'F O j er- Far-+ o•F -e�c�s�In' dzzx> pc�';fi b 5. Construction Cost: What is the estimated cost of the proposed work? $ ZSj000.yo 6. Reasons for Appeal: A. An Area Variance to the Zoning Ordinance is requested because strict application of the ordinance would create the following hardship: — ke— Geer �J uro Gem zs, L o-�, o C S orn Gkhn i�ou�'e S i V-S on RQc - �► rn S-e�4 Bic.. Owner Wc)vL-o � (K2 C.. C OU-e C-e. 5,�'0 CQ --1-o S ar n 17 n B. An interpretation of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because: C. A Use Variance to the Zoning Ordinance is requested because strict application of the ordinance would create the following hardship: 2 (Use additional sheets if necessary) 3/21/19 7. Requested Zoning Appeals: I. Section of Rye Brook Code: § -LSO, 2.0 Zoning Requirement: rYN 1 y11i rii vim• r-e�lJ i�' rei,r }cc�� �2L TJ tom" Proposed Work: w\ 11 eeS,j,-T- i ►i a ►r'e ct r Requested Variance: 14 G o-t P per- c l ej rn S-e4 1�r4C K UcL y i a h c g i J II. Section of Rye Brook Code: § Zoning Requirement: Proposed Work: Requested Variance: M. Section of Rye Brook Code: § Zoning Requirement: Proposed Work: Requested Variance: IV. Section of Rye Brook Code: § Zoning Requirement: Proposed Work: Requested Variance: V. Section of Rye Brook Code: § Zoning Requirement: Proposed Work: Requested Variance: 3 (Use additional sheets if necessary) 3/21/19 8. Item checklist of information from instruction sheet: O Letter of Disapproval ( ) Properly Completed & Signed Original Zoning Variance Application { ) Two (2) Sets of Sealed Plans ( ) Non-refundable Application Fee of$350.00 ( ) Escrow Account Fee of$1,000.00 ( ) Provisions of any deeds, covenants, easements or restrictions affecting thc kind of improvements allowed or prohibited upon the premises. { ) Notarized Mailer& Sign Affidavits, Area Map &Public Notification List (Please note that the notarized affidavits tnust be received by the Building Department by no later han the Thursday prior to the scheduled zoning heating) This application must include the notarized signature(s) of the applica t of record as well that of the legal owner(s) of the subject property in the spaces provided bel w. Any application not properly signed shall be deemed null and void and will be returne to the applicant. STATE OF NEW YOM COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER ) as: 3ccy'tr4a JTL ,being duly sworn, deposes and states that he/she h the applicant above named, (print name of individual signing as the applicant) and further states that (s)he is the legal owner of the property to which this application pertains, or Ithat (s)he is the ,�1�kq,-n- for the legal owner and is duly authorized to n ake and file this application. (indicate architect,contractor,agent,attorney,etc.) That all statements contained herein are true to the best of his/her knowledge and belief, ar d that any work performed or use conducted at the above captioned property will be in conformance with the dcterminat ion of, and any conditions set by the Rye Brook Zoning Board of Appeals, with the details as set forth and contained n this application and in any accompanying approved plans and specifications, as well as in accordance with the N w York State Uniform Fire Prevention & Building Code, the Code of the Village of Rye Brook and all other ap licable laws; ordinances and regulations. Sworn Itobefore me this Sworn to be fore me this ! r � day of 20_i, day of , 20 'a Notary Public Notary Public c Signa a of Property Owner ?Signature o Applicant I Print Name of Property Owner Print Name 3f Applicant SHARI MELILLO SARI MELILL Notary public,State of New York Notary PL blic, State of I lewYork No.01 ME6160063 N .01 ME61600 3 Qualified in Westchester County33 Qualified in Westcheste,County Commission Expires Januan,29.20 Commission xnires Janua N 29.20 a 4 3/21/19 7. Requested Zoning Appeals: I. Section of Rye Brook Code: § Z O o Zoung Rmnt: 11 vn�w = ^�A 0 pr q Proposed Work: ., car r Z 6 'Pr Requested Variance: & 14 roo Y-KKeyd-�14AICIC /. II.Section of Rye Brook Code: § Zoning Requirement: Proposed Work: Requested Variance: III. Section of Rye Brook Code: § 1 Zoning Requirement: Proposed Work: I Requested Variance: I I IV. Section of Rye Brook Code § Zoning Requirement: Proposed Work: Requested Varian V.Section of Ry Brook Code: § Zoning Req ement: Proposed Work: Requested Variance: 3 (Use M4 itional sheets if ecessary) 3/21/19 1n17 63 Q♦ 4• f 40 c1 e V v •.. q � Et � e � \ O Y A Y ' El w N717000 Y t 15 a SEWER p$ 4 Y SE qST CT/6••~ - � 7 .• • �e ' I ! 'SEWER SEWS DISTRI T#1 8 ���/// 19 Y•. J Y �F9 • s 3 Tt L J • n> 4 rnu I ,4 J wn p• S ,P� S 16 a LANE 13 18 Y 12 a 11 a s21 �S s F7� 9 O • i WAY 6 JAMES 7m0 • ♦ P � O A I 7L1 3 s e .27 wax W BIRCH LANE t 5.3 I � I a . 1 R 6.4 d RED ROOF DRIVE S DSTRICT#11 • 177 28 s 5.11• - S.1D x _5.5 5.8. �, 5.7. 6. 45• nr g . wx s • g BROWN 1 p 4 e 4 1.1 3 C. d rr o ZI �'• O d g 4 w N 17OOD ♦° 28 we ♦ 29 t — : r+ a vx _. _.. 13 '� 47 64 I ° y r 1 w , NEMlON TMLE RI ON TMLE l.ECuk 037"Kn LEGEND ZZ Village of Rye Brook DR Atzenda C 'y Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting Wednesday, November 4, 2020 at 8:00 PM Village Hall, 938 King Street 1. ITEMS: 1.1. #20-012 David Morrisey& Carin Morrisey 21 Woodland Drive Construct a 2nd floor addition &rear one story addition. Mail Affidavit Sign Affidavit Approvals; Adjournment Aye; Nay; 1.2. #20-017 Jeffrey Abraham & Melissa Milsten 3 Charles Lane Construct a new rear deck, new roof over existing patio, extend patio w/fire pit, barbeque and sitting wall. Mail Affidavit Sign Affidavit Approvals; Adjournment Aye; Nay; DM MI SB SF GB PP JDS K&B JS DH 2 Village of Rye Brook Qy� DR Agenda J� y Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting Wednesday, November 4, 2020 at 8:00 PM Village Hall, 938 King Street a 1.3. 420-018 Joshua Shaw & Melissa Shaw 12 Birch Lane Construct a new roof over rear patio, new outdoor kitchen, patio expansion and remove existing gazebo. Mail Affidavit V"' Sign Affidavit Approvals; Adjournment Aye; s Nay; 2. SUMMARY APPROVALS: 2.1. Approval of August 4, 2020 Zoning Board Summary Approvals; Adjournment Aye; Nay; DM MI SB / SF GB A K JDS f K&B JS J DH 3 Village of Rye Brook R,U� Agenda Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting Wednesday,November 4,2020 at 8:00 PM Village Hall,938 King Street 2. SUMMARY APPROVALS: 2.2. Approval of September 1, 2020 Zoning Board Summary Approvals; Adjournment Aye; Nay; 2.3. Approval of October 6, 2020 Zoning Board Summary Approvals; Adjournment Aye; Nay; DM MI SB SF GB PP IDS hx B JS DH 4 Village of Rye Brook MAR - 3 2021 ] 01 Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK Wednesday, November 4, 2020 at 8:00 PM I BUILDING DEPARTMENT Village Hall, 938 King Street November 4, 2020 Minutes EDATE�P7 9 ED a ANNOUNCEMENT: The November 4, 2020 Zoning Board of Appeals meeting will be held via videoconferencing and in-person, if permitted by the Governor's Executive Orders. The public will have an opportunity to see and hear the meeting live and provide comments. Further information on in-person attendance,if permitted,will be available on the Village website. The public can watch the live meeting on Cable TV, online from the Public Meetings link on the Village website (www.ryebrook.org), and through the Zoom App. If any interested members of the public would like to provide comments on an application, comments can be called in during the meeting at +1 (929) 205- 6099, Meeting ID: 895 1214 2932 or provided through the written chat section of the Zoom meeting. Comments can also be emailed before and during the public hearing to Michael Izzo, Village Building Inspector, at mizzoC?ae,ryebrook.org. Please check the Village website for updates. INSTRUCTIONS TO ACCESS THE VIRTUAL MEETING: If you have a computer, tablet or smartphone,you can register, log in and see the video and hear the audio of the live session. You can access the Zoom meeting atoms://us02web.zoom.us/j/89512142932 and clicking on "Join a Meeting", and enter Meeting ID: 8951214 2932 (no password required). You can also call in to the ZOOM meeting at +1 (929) 205-6099, when prompted, enter 895 1214 2932#. On the evening of November 4, 2020, 5 minutes before 8:00 p.m., log in with your computer, smartphone or telephone. You will be placed on hold until the meeting starts. Questions about accessing the Zoom videoconference should be emailed to amarshall cQlyebrook.org. Don Moscato Okay. Okay,welcome. Welcome to the November 4th meeting of the Rye Brook Zoning Board of Appeals. The full board is in attendance along with building inspector Mickey Izzo, Village Council Drew Gamils, Board of Trustees liaison, David Heiser, and zoom coordinator for us this evening is - 1 - htt s://otter.ai Alex Marshall. And somewhere sending out the feed is Fred Seifert. We have three applications before us this evening. And I'm just going to start out, the suggestion typically is to stay on mute, until you're going to speak so that we eliminate as many background noises as possible; dogs barking, fire alarms going off and other sorts of interesting distractions. 1.1. #20-012 David Morrisey& Carin Morrisey 21 Woodland Drive Construct a 2nd floor addition& rear one-story addition. Don Moscato Firstly, first application this evening is application number 20-012. David Morrisey, and Karen Morrissey. 21 Woodland Drive to construct a second-floor addition and rear one-story addition. Who's going to be making your presentation this evening? Is it going to be your architect? Mark Mustacato Yes. It's me. Mark Mustacato from RMG Associates. How are you? Don Moscato Okay. Welcome, Michael Izzo Hello,Mark. Mark Mustacato Yes. How are you? So,let me just share my screen. Don Moscato Yes. Whatever you like. Okay. Mark Mustacato Okay, so what we're proposing tonight is a second-floor addition to existing split-level house. Let me see, scroll through some of the pictures here. Hopefully. It's an existing split-level house. Here's a street view of the house. And we're proposing to add above the living room area here, this area,if you can see my cursor. There. There above the living room, dining room area.And then there's some other photos of the side and rear of the house. And so, I'm going to go back to the plan for a second here. Yeah, bear with me, very slowly. So again, this is the front elevation of the house. Tonight,we're requesting two variances. One is a setback variance. This is in the R-25 zone,which - 2- Transcribed by https://otter.ai requires a front setback that is equal to either 40 feet or equal to the average of the two houses on either side of you. The house to the left of us is very close to the street, but the house to the right of us is very far back from the street as a setback of over 94 feet. So that creates a required setback for our house of over 67.3 feet. And the existing setback is 50.8 feet. So,we will not be encroaching any further than the existing house,we'll be building over the top of this section of the footprint that exists below it. The second variance that we're requesting tonight is if a front yard setback, after setback, ratio variance. And again, if you look here,you can see this this lower line is the allowable height to setback ratio. And you can see actually just partially clips this existing gable already because the grade is lower at the front. And this is the proposed height to setback ratio that we will be providing. So again, those are the two variances we're requesting this front elevation,we felt that the best way to handle the elevation is to have a side to side gable roof matching the pitch of this existing gable rather than a front to back cable which would have, I think, created a lot of mass here and less interesting looking it would have avoided this variance but it wouldn't have been the right solution for the statics of the house. And so, you can see again we have the rear of the house. This is the master bedroom suite in the back, and we have a small bump out addition here in the kitchen area. So, this is the existing first floor of the house. We have the living room dining room kitchen in this area with the screen porch, proposing to push out open up and push out the back of the kitchen here. And then on the second floor. We'll be adding again at the top of the stairs here a new master suite with a little study area for working from home and so many people are doing,walk-in closets and the master bathroom. So,we feel again that these are really the minimum variances that will relieve the hardship and accomplish what-what you want I don't think it has any detriment to the neighborhood in any way. Aesthetically, I think it'd be a nice addition to the house. And happy to answer any questions that you might have. Michael Izzo Mark if I can jump in can you speak to the percentage of the encroachment regarding the height setback ratio? If you could sort of quantify the percentage of the roof that is going to be in there? Is it?You know, Mark Mustacato Yeah, it's a very small section of the roof that will actually be in it, you can see this chimney, this small area of the gable roof that actually encroaches into the required height, the setback ratio, so we have a side to setback ratio of.55, the maximum is .48. So again, it's really pretty minor. And again, it's just a relatively small area. So,if you look at the front elevation, the percentage of it's probably like this area, this top little triangle right here that is encroaching into the or that doesn't meet the height the setback ratio. Michael Izzo - 3- Transcribed by https://otter.ai Thank you. Don Moscato Mark, the question I have is I understand fully the contextual requirement, and I pretty much walked by that house every day. Okay, and very familiar with the contiguous houses. My question, I guess,would be and in this case, did you start out designing the recommendation, and then find out that you had a front side yard setback issue? Or did you start out by designing it without the need for that type of variance?And then find out that you were not happy with the design, culminating in the existing plans that you have before us? Mark Mustacato We? I don't know that we did necessarily either one. What we did was research what we thought were the best solutions for the roofline of the house, reached the conclusion that this is what they should look like. We went over it, Mr. &Mrs. Morrissey and agreed with that. And realize that in order to do that,we are going to need the variance, but we thought it's worthwhile to seek that to get the aesthetic appearance that we desire. Don Moscato Okay, am I correct in saying that you're looking for a point oh, seven? relief over a point four, eight, which is about 15%. Is that? Okay, fine. Okay. Does anyone else have any questions of the architect? Steve Berger What's on the side where you're going to be violating the height setback?What's the distance to the neighbor's property?And are there trees there? Mark Mustacato Yeah. And also,just- just to point out, this part that's close to the neighbor's property line, does not violate the height, the setback ratio, the side meets the side requirement. And this point here. Otherwise, I'm going to if you see my cursor, this whole area meets the height, the setback ratio, there are plans to some plantings along the property line,we're approximately 24.7 feet from the property line there. And the truth is, if we had done if we do the roof in the opposite direction, where we do a front to back Gable, so that, rather than seeing a peak here at the front,you would see a roof like this and the front, the neighbor would see a much taller facade, and we wouldn't need the variance, because they'd be looking at a Gable ends in that case,instead of looking at this roof sloping away from them. So,we have we have a very good distance to the side property line. Yeah, and I think we have quite a bit of privacy in it. And the reality is this design is better for them. They'll see less height than if we did that in the opposite direction. - 4- Transcribed by https://otter.ai Steve Berger Thank you. Don Moscato Am I correct in stating that the neighbor to your side would be facing the front of the property, the house to the left has a new inhabitant, is that correct? Mark Mustacato So, I'm sorry. Say it one more time. Don Moscato They did they just move? in the people to your immediate left? Karen Morrisey Both David Morrisey Left and Right Don Moscato And have you touched base with them in terms of how they liked the idea of the plan is proposed? David Morrisey The one to the right,yes. The one to the left-we have only met them once. They literally just moved in three weeks ago. Don Moscato Right. That's what I thought because there's a lot of construction going on there for quite a while. David Morrisey Yeah that's to the left Don Moscato Okay. All right. So,you say that one to the, to the right, the one with the large setback, they approve of the proposal. David Morrisey - 5- Transcribed by https:Hotter.ai I spoke to the wife and explained what we were doing because she asked. She saw the sign in front of our house. And she has a letter to Don Moscato Right. Okay. Anyone else have any questions of the of the architect? Glenn Brettschneider Good Jamie Schutzer Nope. Don Moscato Everyone? Okay. Okay, I don't think we received any letters of formal letters of support. But Alex, is there anyone else online here that may speak for against the application? Alexandra Marshall There's no one waiting in the meeting waiting room. So, if there's anyone currently in the meeting, they are welcome to unmute themselves. Don Moscato Okay. All right. Doesn't look like there's anyone can I have a motion to close the public hearing? Jamie Schutzer So, moved. Glenn Brettschneider Second Mark Mustacato Do I stop the screenshare? Don Moscato You can leave that out. Okay. You can leave that up for a while. Okay. Do we have a second? Glenn Brettschneider Second? - 6- Transcribed by https://otter.ai Don Moscato Okay, public meeting is closed. Okay. You know, this is a classic example,in my opinion of, of having one house, that is dramatically setback. And another one that is pretty much in a, in a normal situation causing hardship for the house in between the two. And in the past,we've usually been very accommodating in terms of giving relief for the front yard setback in this particular case. As you saw the only question I had was,is there an alternative that will meet the needs of the applicants that can be pursued? And so, I'll ask my fellow board members, are you comfortable with the explanation that Mr. Muscatato gave with respect to the alternative roof design?You want to chime in on that if you're comfortable with that? Joel Simon I have no issues with it. Jamie Schutzer I don't Glenn Brettschneider I don't have anything Steve Berger I think- I think this design is better looking for the house. Joel Simon I agree. Jamie Schutzer Same Don Moscato Yeah, I concur. I concur with that. Okay, so if I'll go through the five factors with you. It seems to me the only two concerns. I don't think it's a character violation issue of the neighborhood. I don't think it's an environmental issue. I believe they are substantial, and the variances are self-created. And I think you all answered that cannot be achieved through another method feasible for the application. So,I'm going to go ahead and read the result and seek your- seek your approval on the resolution. - 7- Transcribed by https://otter.ai RESOLUTION WHEREAS, application has been made to the Zoning Board by David Morrisey & Carin Morrisey (the "Applicants") for (1) a contextual front yard setback variance of 16.5 feet where the minimum required contextual front yard setback is 67.3 feet pursuant to Village Code § 250- 18.2.H, and (2) a front height setback ratio variance of 0.07 where the maximum allowable front height setback ratio is 0.48 pursuant to Village Code 5 250-18.2 J(1), in connection with the proposed 2nd floor addition, on property located at 21 Woodland Drive,in an R-25 zoning district on the North side of Woodland Drive, approximately 1,200 feet from the intersection of Beechwood Boulevard and Woodland Drive. Said premises being known and designated on the tax map of the Village of Rye Brook as Parcel ID# 135.36-1-36; and WHEREAS, a duly advertised public hearing was held November 4, 2020, at which time all those wishing to be heard were given such opportunity; and WHEREAS, the public hearing was closed on November 4, 2020; and WHEREAS, the proposed action is a Type II action pursuant to the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act and accordingly, no further environmental review is required; and WHEREAS, the Board, from the application, after viewing the premises and neighborhood concerned, and upon considering each of the factors set forth at Section 250-13(G)(b)[21[a]-[e] of the Rye Brook Code, finds: 1) The variances WILL NOT create an adverse impact to the character of the neighborhood; 2) The benefit the Applicants seek CANNOT be achieved through another method, feasible for the Applicants to pursue, that does not require the variances; 3) The variances ARE substantial; - 8- Transcribed by https:Hotter.ai 4) The variances WILL. NOT create any adverse impacts to the physical or environmental conditions of the neighborhood; and 5) The need for the variances IS self-created. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the said application for (1) a contextual front yard setback variance of 16.5 feet where the minimum required contextual front yard setback is 67.3 feet pursuant to Village Code § 250-18.2.H, and (2) a front height setback ratio variance of 0.07 where the maximum allowable front height setback ratio is 0.48 pursuant to Village Code 5 250- 18.2.J(1),is hereby GRANTED on the following conditions: 1) No permit or certificate of occupancy shall be issued until the Applicants have paid in full all application and consultant fees incurred by the Village in connection with the review of this application. Don Moscato Okay, let's take a vote on this then. Steve? Steve Berger Yes. Don Moscato Glenn? Glenn Brettschneider Yes. Michael Izzo Jamie? Jamie Schutzer Yes. Don Moscato Joel? - 9- Transcribed by https:Hotter.ai Joel Simon Yes. Don Moscato Don?Yes. Okay. Application approved five yeses, zero nos. Congratulations.You can remove the shared screen now. Mark, thank you very)much. Mark Mustacato Thank you. Karen Morrisey Thank you. David Morrisey Thank you. 1.2. #20-017 Jeffrey Abraham & Melissa Milsten 3 Charles Lane Construct a new rear deck, new roof over existing patio, extend patio w/ fire pit, barbeque and sitting wall. Don Moscato Second application before us. Is application number 20-017. Let me jump up there. There we go. Charles lane. Application 20-017 Jeffrey Abraham and Melissa Milstein. 3 Charles Lane, construct a new rear deck, new roof over existing patio and extend the patio with fire pit. Barbecue and sitting wall. Okay, is John Are you there? John Scarlato I'm here. Can you hear me? Don Moscato Yes. Okay. You ready to go? John Scarlato Yes. I mean, the Abrahams are on the screen. So, I'll take over the screen for them. Can you see my screen? - 10 - Transcribed by https:Hotter.ai Don Moscato Yep. John Scarlato Okay, I'll start with the photo of the front of the house. This is the backyard looking back at the neighbors. This is looking back at the house. So right now, this is the existing patio. This is the area we're putting the new roof over. And right now, because of the setback issue. We have basically a walkway coming out the door of the because it's a flat level. Let me come down the steps to the patio. So, we wanted to put a real deck at this level so that you don't have to always go down a step to go outside and barbecue. Now, this backyard is interesting because this section of it is the yards like an'L'. So, this piece of property kind of cuts into it. So, our setback from this part of the house is short. And our part back from this part of the house is really long because it goes back to see it from the site plan. So that's the reason we're going for a variance to the deck. Again,we're looking into that. So those are the folders. Don Moscato How far back is that longest portion? In terms of footage shot, John Scarlato Let me pull up the drawing a little better. Let's just make it a little bigger, so we can see. Okay, so the house,we need a 40-foot rear yard setback. And the house is like 44.And we have a four-foot walkway. So, the four-foot walkway work. So, this part from here to the house is like 44 feet,we have a four-foot walkway now that comes out the door and goes down to the patio. This part of the house goes back another 45 feet,like this section here. So, this is where we're proposing to do the new deck is here. And we're doing a 14-foot deck,which puts us sort of have a 30-foot rear yard setback. Michael Izzo John, can you zoom and center that to that site plan, can you? John Scarlato You're going to test me, aren't you? Joel Simon You bet I am. John Scarlato - 11 - Transcribed by https://otter.ai I'm getting better, I'm getting better. Michael Izzo There you go. Yeah, yeah, that depicts the, the chunk that's missing from the rear yard. John Scarlato Right, so, and so our rear yard setback from this part hitting the chunk. And then those parts are non-issue because we've got a lot more room. And the house just happens to be,you know, positioned on the site the way it is,it's actually you know,we're 34 feet off the left side, and we're 15 feet off or 14 feet off the right side. So,the house and kind of put the other way,we would have been kind of in their part of it, but you know it is what it is. So that's why we're here for a 10-foot setback to put a 14-foot-deep deck on the back of the house. And then we're going to step down to the new patio. We're doing the roof over the existing patio,which is not an issue because we're behind the bigger part of the yard. Joel Simon John what address is that that takes up that chunk. John Scarlato This is the roof patio. This shaded area. This is the deck. This is our new stairway going down to the new patio. And then we're doing a stone sitting wall at the end of the patio want to fire. Joel Simon John,who's address is that that takes up that stone? John Scarlato We have, I believe we have a letter of support for them. Joel Simon That's what I'm curious about. John Scarlato And it's Mark Drive, I believe at the back of Mark. Don Moscato Yeah, you do have a letter from someone from Mark drive. John Scarlato - 12- Transcribed by https://otter.ai Right. But it's on the cul-de-sac of Mark. It backs up to them. Don Moscato And what would be the total square footage of the deck John Scarlato Just a sec I think that's on my zoning chart. Hold on. 322 square feet. 1.7% of the lot size we're allowed to have 4%. Don Moscato Okay. And you've wrestled with the idea of making a smaller deck and you've decided that John Scarlato It's really not a big deck. It's really not that big. We're limited to the generator to which kind of made us not even go across the whole back of the house. So, the deck is really only going behind the kitchen on the eating area. And we're not going to be because of this window and the generator. We're only running behind the family room. We're only going to be on the kitchen so it's we're talking about 14 feet out and it's like 24 feet wide. Glenn Brettschneider My math has it at 23 feet wide John Scarlato It's actually only 20- it's like 20 feet 6 inches. Joel Simon So is it 14 feet further than What it is or 14 feet, including 10 feet on the walkway. So,if you see that 30,you got 30 feet between what you currently have in the property line, eat up 10 of that, leaving 20 feet. John Scarlato We have 40 feet between the walkway to the property line. We're taking 10 feet;we're going to have 30 feet left. Joel Simon Can you scroll down just so we can see the borderline again? - 13- Transcribed by https://otter.ai John Scarlato Plot plan? Joel Simon Yeah. John Scarlato Right, so right now we have 40 feet from the walk walkway to the property line,we're going to have 30 feet from the deck to the property. Joel Simon I see, okay. John Scarlato We really didn't do a big deck. And we really have more patio space. We really wanted to play so you can go outside barbecue and have a table outside the main level, the kitchen level,which makes life easier. And then their chairs and hangouts going to be the fire pit at the lower patio,which is a non-issue. So,we really didn't come in with a really big deck. Don Moscato Can John- can you comment on the screening for the benefit of the viewing audience. John Scarlato I mean, their yard is very well landscaped and very well screened if I go back to my photo. So,if you're looking out at the backyard,it's fairly well,landscape between the houses landscape in the outside part of the property is all landscaped or fence. And this is what we're talking about doing. And they're probably going to replant the bushes that are around the deck now around the new deck. So, it is still in here. Steve Berger And I assume you're not touching the trees. John Scarlato We're not touching the tree. Glenn Brettschneider John where does the 14 feet come from? - 14- Transcribed by https://otter.ai John Scarlato 14 feet is from the back of the house. It's on the edge- Glenn Brettschneider No, no, no, no, no, I understand that. It's um- it's a typical Brettschneider question how,you know, it's 14 feet. Where's 14 coming from because- John Scarlato 14 feet works really well for a deck structurally, the way that with only one line of columns. And 14 works good for furniture and chairs and table and getting around it with people sitting at a table. Okay, Glenn Brettschneider is that a typical good size? 12-14 feet? I'm not saying you should be 12 John Scarlato Yeah, 12 to 14 is a very easy to build, easy to work with. Glenn Brettschneider Right John Scarlato If you go over 14 feet,you need to do the double row of sauna tubes and beam, so it adds the cost. Glenn Brettschneider Right. And- John Scarlato And we did it because of the setbacks on the side. Glenn Brettschneider Okay. Don Moscato Jamie, do you have any questions? Mark Mustacato - 15- Transcribed by https://otter.ai I actually had this exact issue in my own home probably 10-12 years ago and John helped me do this. I look at it as an irregular lot size. I mean,that L. Right. I mean,if that was just straight across the back, or like john said,if the house was built in the middle, you know you wouldn't have this issue. But the fact that it's- it's screened in so nicely back there. And,you know, you can't avoid the fact that it has that irregular lot size. You know, I'm- I'm comfortable with this. Glenn Brettschneider But that actually leads me to a question I thought of earlier,Jamie,thank you for letting me think about that. So,what would be the difference if it was not an irregular lot?Right? It's longer, but the part that's longer is irrelevant. Right. So,if you had a, a straight line across from the 40 feet, and you wanted to put a deck,would that make any difference in designing it? Because it would still be 40 feet? So, the fact that it's an irregular size,I don't think has any relevance to the deck. Right? John Scarlato I think because I mean, I think when I design a deck that I know has a setback issue,whether it's the whole yard part of the yard,we kind of look at,you know, what the requirement is? What a reasonable size deck, that makes sense that works with it, and we try to design, you know, to give us in theory, the most space between the setback and a reasonable back. So Glenn Brettschneider Right, right. What I'm saying is I don't think that the fact that it's an irregular shape really becomes an issue. It would be the same If it was just squared off, and you had a 40-foot setback, and you wanted to put a deck there anyway. John Scarlato Well, I mean,it depends. I mean if the rear irregular shape is making your lot less depth than the normal lot would be, and you would have had 50 feet in the rear instead of the 40. Because it was a deeper lot and your deck is making it shorter than you may not have the issue if it was a regular lot, because we would have the extra 10 feet in the deck would have fit. Joel Simon And I think I think the only difference it makes is by having that extra room in the other area,it changes the look of the yard and the perception of the yard. Glenn Brettschneider Right. But as John said, the fact that it's only 40 feet actually is the opposite. It's the same,you know,it's the other side of this, you know, same coin, the fact that you have less room now to work - 16- Transcribed by https://otter.ai with. It's not again, that it's irregular, it's just that portion is kind of shorter,which makes it you know, you have less room to work with. So, you need a variance John Scarlato Right, or sometimes again, you know, the houses are built on their rear yard setback. So, like, they don't think about it, they think a patio and they don't think people in the future don't want to go up and down stairs. So, depending on how the house is laid on a lot,you know,it depends. So Glenn Brettschneider I would assume most houses were not constructed on the rear setback, though, right? John Scarlato I mean usually there's more room in the rear. Usually, they pop them closer to the front yard setback, but right. Glenn Brettschneider Okay. Don Moscato Are there any other questions of John? Okay,let the record show that there were two letters from proximate homeowners that are in support of the application. Alex, anyone else waiting in the wings to come in on this that you're aware? Alexandra Marshall No one's in the waiting room. Don Moscato Okay. Can I have a motion to close public hearing? Jamie Schutzer So moved Glenn Brettschneider Motion to close, Oh, Second. Don Moscato - 17 - Transcribed by https://otter.ai Okay. Seconded. Okay. public hearing is closed. I don't have a problem at all with the application. I do think the variances )ust as the previous application there in terms of the factors are self-created and significant size variances. I don't think it impacts the character. There is sufficient screening. I don't think we brought up any issues of water for physical environmental conditions. And are you all in agreement that this is the smallest possible variance to meet the need?We okay with that? Okay, yeah, got a few nods there. Glenn Brettschneider I'm like- I'm like torn. I think it's nice. I think you could go a little smaller but if you're going to use the wording, you know to fit their needs. As John said 14 does make it a little more comfortable, then I would agree that it is the smallest once you put that Don Moscato Alright,let me go ahead with the resolution. RESOLUTION WHEREAS, application has been made to the Zoning Board by Jeffrey Abraham & Melissa Milsten (the "Applicants") for a rear yard setback variance of 10 feet where the minimum required rear yard setback is 40 feet pursuant to Village Code § 250-20.G(3),in connection with the proposed construction of a new rear deck, new roof over existing rear patio, extend patio w/ fire pit, barbecue and sitting wall, on property located at 3 Charles Lane, in an R-15 zoning district on the West side of Charles Lane, approximately 225 feet from the intersection of Mark Drive and Charles Lane. Said premises being known and designated on the tax map of the Village of Rye Brook as Parcel ID# 135.33-1-7; and WHEREAS, a duly advertised public hearing was held November 4, 2020, at which time all those wishing to be heard were given such opportunity; and WHEREAS, the public hearing was closed on November 4, 2020;and - 18- Transcribed by https://otter.ai WHEREAS, the proposed action is a Type II action pursuant to the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act and accordingly, no further environmental review is required; and WHEREAS, the Board, from the application, after viewing the premises and neighborhood concerned,and upon considering each of the factors set forth at Section 250-13(G)(b)[2][a]-[e] of the Rye Brook Code, finds: 1) The variance WILL NOT create an adverse impact to the character of the neighborhood; 2) The benefit the Applicants seek CANNOT be achieved through another method, feasible for the Applicants to pursue, that does not require the variance; 3) The variance IS substantial; 4) The variance WILL NOT create any adverse impacts to the physical or environmental conditions of the neighborhood; and 5) The need for the variance IS self-created. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED that the said application for a rear yard setback variance of 10 feet where the minimum required rear yard setback is 40 feet pursuant to Village Code 250-20.G(3),is hereby GRANTED on the following conditions: 1) No permit or certificate of occupancy shall be issued until the Applicants have paid in full all application and consultant fees incurred by the Village in connection with the review of this application. Steve Berger Yes Don Moscato Glen? - 19- Transcribed by https://otter.ai Glenn Brettschneider Yeah, yes. Don Moscato Jamie? Jamie Schutzer Yes. Don Moscato Joel. Joel Simon Yes Don Moscato Okay, Don. Yes. application is approved five yeses, zero nays. Okay, congratulations. John Scarlato Thank you very much. Jeffrey Milstein Thank you Melissa Milstein Thank you so much. Don Moscato Okay, you're welcome. You're gonna stick with us. John Scarlato I'm sticking with you. I'll pull up the next one. 1.3. #20-018 Joshua Shaw& Melissa Shaw 12 Birch Lane Construct a new roof over rear patio, new outdoor kitchen,patio expansion and remove existing gazebo. Don Moscato - 20- Transcribed by https://otter.ai Application number 20-018,Joshua Shaw and Melissa Shaw, 12 Birch lane, constructing new roof, rear patio,new outdoor kitchen,patio expansion and remove existing gazebo. And as you all know, this is part of red roof complex. So,go ahead,John, he can start your info. John Scarlato We're going to start with the photos. That's the front of the house I got. So, this is coming around the side of the house. The house has a pool with a patio around it and the patio running back against the back of the house. And there's a free-standing gazebo. That's the only covering of the backyard. So um, okay, so this is different shots of the backyard. Don Moscato John,why is there a different elevation in terms of that patio that's there now? Is there a reason for that? John Scarlato What do you mean? Don Moscato There's like a small step down to the pool area? John Scarlato I think because- I guess they're just working with the grade. So,you come out landings of the two sliding glass doors and stuff down to the patio. And then you step down to the lower patio that has a pool and a hot tub. Glenn Brettschneider If you see some of the other photos, you'll see this it looks like it's definitely on a grade because it's kind of like, John Scarlato yeah, and then there's a retaining wall Glenn Brettschneider Right John Scarlato There on that side that holds it - 21 - Transcribed by https://otter.ai Glenn Brettschneider Right John Scarlato There. One. I don't have a good picture of it. Glenn Brettschneider You do? Yeah. You have a picture of it. John Scarlato All right. Those are stairs going down. Don Moscato Yeah, there's no question that there's abundant screening image there in the back. Those are pretty tall. John Scarlato I guess they're all gone. This is the other side of the house. Right. So, then the house is built with a retaining wall. So, this is the retaining wall with the gazebo is on the other side. Right now, has two levels of wall. So, this is the area where we're trying to do a roof area because there's no shade and it gets really too hot, because the whole backyard is south facing. So those are the photos. Don Moscato So from your architectural insight,if they have a barbecue there,you know sometimes when people put a, a barbecue in, especially a structural one built in, often times it creates challenges for the people who are downwind from that. Not that they don't like the smell of,you know,good barbecue, but I've been in situations where people have complained that the barbecue was so close to their property that every time they ran the barbecue, they got smoke inhalation. The siting of the barbecue in this case, how is that going to potentially impact the neighbors? John Scarlato Well, I mean,we're in from our side yard setback and the other house around the cul de sac, the other house is kind of over in that way. So, I'm not thinking the barbecue should be that much of an issue, like a normal barbecue. And sometimes we put a fan in the ceiling to blow it up higher. Don Moscato Did you have any as part of the design?That was the nature of my question. How are you venting that, that barbecue that's going to be a permanent? - 22- Transcribed by https://otter.ai John Scarlato We're probably going to do a fan and the barbecue is not on the- it's at the back not on the end,we can put a fan in I mean, I was thinking it was at the end of it,we probably could get away without a fan, because we're on the end- we're on the edge of the roof. And it's like a nine-foot ceiling. But or we could put it on, try to vent to them. Don Moscato Okay, and comment on this the size, I know Glenn brought it up in the earlier application. This deck, I have down here 40 by 14 is that is that approximately correct John Scarlato So right now,you come out,you hit a landing,you go down a step,which kind of kills a lot of the patio, this patio is actually deeper here. But we're not putting the roof deeper, because 14 was structurally what worked to make it and it worked with kind of the patio. So, this part of the patio is not covered, this part is covered, and they figure they're going to put their table in a sitting area. So, the table is going to be kind of in this area, and the seating is going to be kind of in here with the barbecue at the end. So,we did 14 feet,we lined up with the one into the house. And we brought it to where the post ended with this part of the patio. And then we angled it so that we covered this whole wing of the house because we just thought it looked kind of strange if we came back in the middle because this piece of the house sticks out further so we got to just angled it back. And we did a really shallow pitched roof because they're really just trying to get an area that they're not going to get rained on if it's raining. And it's not the sun's not on them. So,we did a very shallow hipped roof so that it almost looks like the whole thing spot because we're trying to make it very unintrusive and kind of low profile with square columns. So that's how-that's how the length was, was governed by kind of the pattern with lines of the patio and the two wings of the house by just covering them. Jamie Schutzer John in that- in that picture right there where currently is the gazebo in there? John Scarlato The gazebo is out here, freestanding. Jamie Schutzer Okay, John Scarlato - 23- Transcribed by https://otter.ai And we're getting rid of the gazebo. Jamie Schutzer Right, John Scarlato And I'm assuming that gazebo was done by the previous owner, because it's a freestanding structure, so it's like a shed. So,you can sit in your backyard correct. So that's kind of why it was done but it doesn't really work because you've got to leave the house to get out to it. And it's really too small to maybe put a table or a little bit of seating,it doesn't really work for groups of people entertaining so that was kind of a problem. Glenn Brettschneider So,John the roof is going out. I guess there'll be a 26-foot setback from the property line. Um, out back I assume that's the property line and not the trees? John Scarlato That's the property line Glenn Brettschneider So if I could ask you or if Josh wants to answer, because he's my neighbor across the street, what's on the other side of those hedges I you know, I looked at him too. I noticed what Don did they're nice height. They're very dense. They provide a lot of you know, a nice barrier but what is on the other side and I assume another house? The back of another house? Joshua Shaw Yeah, our neighbor's backyard. They have an outdoor kitchen and a patch of grass for their two dogs. But you we don't see them because it's pretty tall and dense. Glenn Brettschneider Okay, Joshua Shaw but it's not on Red Roof, right?it's on the it's on the other street behind us or another red house behind them on red roof. That's right. Glenn Brettschneider Right and you smell their food which is probably why you want the kitchen as well right? - 24- Transcribed by https://otter.ai Joshua Shaw Just two comments if I may? Two comments One is if you notice on the pictures John took which I didn't know he took any pictures like you did. It was really nice. We've got about six umbrellas in the backyard. That's how brutally hot it is. We have zero shade in the backyard. So, 85 and 87-year- old parents come over Yeah, skin cancer in the light. Like they literally don't know where to sit at all for shade. Our neighbor on the right side is all the way back. So, our BBQ would actually face the cul de sac circle. It's not facing anyone's house. Glenn Brettschneider Yeah. And are the people behind you with two dogs? Is that Gottlieb? Joshua Shaw Yeah. Glenn Brettschneider Cause I know they saw our letter because I know they have two dogs. Okay. Joshua Shaw Yeah. Glenn Brettschneider So, they provided a letter from those people. Joshua Shaw So,we provided all three to the right, that would get some downwind smell maybe of the good barbecue. Don Moscato Okay. Okay, let me ask Glenn's question from the previous application. Why not? 12 feet,John? And why does it have to be 14? John Scarlato The issue is,when you come out the door, there's a platform and steps on both sliding glass doors, which eats up like four feet of space. So,it really kills the usable space if I make it 12. And I didn't want to go out the whole 16 that this is. So that's why we did-that's how I came up with the 14 because it just it gave us a decent amount of covering in front of the door in front of the steps coming down. - 25- Transcribed by https://otter.ai Don Moscato Thank you. Does anyone else have any other questions of John? Okay, let me then go through the factors with you. Oh,let me show enter into the record the three letters of support, and that were alluded to earlier by Glenn. And I guess the question is this the smallest possible variance was just answered by John. If the variances are substantial, and the variances are self-created, I don't think there's a character issue and I don't think there are environmental issues. So, are we comfortable with that? Michael Izzo Okay, and you can close- Don you need to close the public meeting. Don Moscato Ah, okay. Now there we have the three letters of support Alex, no one waiting in the wings want to comment. Alexandra Marshall No one's in the waiting room. If anyone else would like to comment, feel free to unmute. Don Moscato OkaN-, I'm going to have a motion to close public hearing. Glenn Brettschneider Motion to close. Don Moscato Okay. All right,good. RESOLUTION WHEREAS, application has been made to the Zoning Board by Joshua Shaw & Melissa Shaw (the "Applicants") for a rear yard setback variance of 14 feet where the minimum required rear yard setback is 40 feet pursuant to Village Code § 250-20.G(3), in connection with the proposed construction of a new roof over rear patio, new outdoor kitchen, patio expansion and removal of existing gazebo, on property located at 12 Birch Lane, in an R-15 zoning district on the South side of Birch Lane, approximately 290 feet from the intersection of Old Orchard Road and - 26- Transcribed by https://otter.ai Birch Lane. Said premises being known and designated on the tax map of the Village of Rye Brook as Parcel ID# 135.43-1-5.40; and WHEREAS, a duly advertised public hearing was held November 4, 2020, at which time all those wishing to be heard were given such opportunity; and WHEREAS, the public hearing was closed on November 4, 2020;and WHEREAS, the proposed action is a Type II action pursuant to the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act and accordingly, no further environmental review is required: and WHEREAS, the Board, from the application, after viewing the premises and neighborhood concerned,and upon considering each of the factors set forth at Section 250-13(G)(b)[2][a]-[e] of the Rye Brook Code, finds: 1) The variance WILL NOT create an adverse impact to the character of the neighborhood. 2) The benefit the Applicants seek CANNOT be achieved through another method, feasible for the Applicants to pursue, that does not require the variance. 3) The variance IS substantial. 4) The variance WILL NOT create any adverse impacts to the physical or environmental conditions of the neighborhood; and 5) The need for the variance IS self-created. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED that the said application for a rear yard setback variance of 14 feet where the minimum required rear yard setback is 40 feet pursuant to Village Code 250-20.G(3),is hereby GRANTED on the following conditions: - 27- Transcribed by https://otter.ai 1) No permit or certificate of occupancy shall be issued until the Applicants have paid in full all application and consultant fees incurred by the Village in connection with the review of this application. Let's go ahead with a vote. Steve. Steve Berger Yes. Don Moscato Glenn? Glenn Brettschneider Yes. Don Moscato Jamie? Jamie Schutzer Yes. Don Moscato Joel? Joel Simon Yes. Don Moscato Don. Yes. Application approved five yeses, zero nays. Congratulations. Drew, can you just comment on the summaries before us? Because my memory is slipping because if you sent them, they were a while ago. And I don't remember going through them recently. So,we still have all four,is it three or four that are outstanding? Drew Gamils It's four outstanding, the format switch. So, Paula is no longer doing our minutes. And we've been using the transcript service to prepare the minutes. So, they're- they're in a different format. So - 28- Transcribed by https:Hotter.ai we're trying to figure out if it's okay, just to give them to you as the transcript or if I should kind of tweak them a little bit and put them back in some format that kind of resembles what we were used to. So, I just got all four today. And so, I'm going to take a look at it and see what makes the most sense for the board. Don Moscato Yeah, the way I look at it is that the transcripts capture the essence of what we're trying to do, then it wouldn't be necessary to tidy them up and do the extra work of retyping them or reformatting them as long as they capture the essence and even use your judicial insight to make that interpretation. And if something needs to be cleaned up, you can clean them up. Drew Gamils They're not summaries. They are word for word transcripts,which is kind of cool to have that in the record,very detailed. But I'm just going to take a look through them. I'm just going to see if there's any cleanup needed. And make sure that each they're divided by what application they apply to so that they're easy to follow. And you'll have them next month, so I apologize for the delay. We just got that figured out today. Don Moscato All right. Thank you. There being nothing else could have motion to adjourn. Jamie Schutzer So, moved. Glenn Brettschneider Seconded. Don Moscato The second meeting is adjourned. Thank you all and enjoy your view of this empire state building John Scarlato Have a great night Don Moscato I'll come up with something next time. Drew Gamils Goodnight everyone - 29- Transcribed by https://otter.ai Jamie Schutzer Goodnight all Steve Berger Goodnight Alexandra Marshall Take care. Michael Izzo Bye - 30- Transcribed by https:Hotter.ai JOHN G. SCARLATO JR. - ARCHITECT OCt 3 0 2020 VILLAGE Or RYE BROOK 33 BYRAM HILL ROAD BUILDING DEPARTMENT ARMONK, NY 10504 PHONE 914 273-7350 FAX 914 273-9222 October 29, 2020 Village of Rye Brook 938 King Street Rye Brook,NY 10573 RE: 12 Birch Lane, Rye Brook,NY AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTIFICATION & POSTING OF SIGN Dear Zoning Board of Appeals: This letter is stating that my office Mailed out the Notice of Public Hearing letter for 12 Birch Lane, according to the village's regulations. The mailing was mailed on October 19, 2020. The sign was created in accordance with the regulations of the village of Rye Brook and put up on October 19, 2020, and will stay up till after the meeting on November 4, 2020. Sincerely, J'tshn G. Scarlato Jr. Sworn to before me this day 0 cly, l b-cT 3 d , 2020 Notary Publicr� SHARI MEUUA Notary Public,State of New York No.01 ME6160063 Oualflied in Westchester County Commisslon Expires.►ani--•oa >n'L--�. 0L r ? U 4r� n x7 m u�u I o co CSC rt.:, N /��' O N }a T W co �=W Q) N UL c) LU Z '� g U. co O p N '" •C r' 'c o rn : ;, 0 c �- o - co .' 7 :o o 0 c E — q 0 0 3 4- U co cn U L cu i CDm •o ) � co _j c X � °� �• � 0o L : o � � m a � � � � zT Q s 0 (n >% CD U +� co � c0c 'c co 0 cu 1 c ••- a) n- N .0 I C C6 (n a) N M >, L� w � o c c, 30 � � � . � cr0 � .� o cv CD -a c 0 _ co a� � o � (D LL. .Q 0 � C � N i.— rn N cz= z 0 N i ,�— ui i CL Oz :3 ui Ld x 2i o n co¢ �o to WLij �1 N iLi-0 O CD o lug >m c c� r c� 0 a c 0 a a 0 rn c •c E > 0 8 U E m E V O E a E c o m o @j cn O c c r� v� r d of a 0 ON 3 � �j ` N � U) O p � Rf O N 0 moT M76 wpm 0 � Cc E° ° ms rn f f � 3 •gl •) ;I ) I s !f! het I (� o z a • ► o s tJ N ` CD �� ! ° a C [ gem! >m �, !f �g1 �•e 11-!llft 1 (T, #S 1 i ------------------ I y� t3' rl � I C1 o I 17 ILUI 3 I I � G H VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK ECEWIED ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS R MAY - 5 2021 RESOLUTION VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE WHEREAS, application has been made to the Zoning Board by Joshua Shaw & Melissa Shaw (the "Applicants") for a rear yard setback variance of 12 feet where the minimum required rear yard setback is 40 feet pursuant to Village Code § 250-20.G(3) in connection with the proposed construction of a new roof deck, on property located at 12 Birch Lane, in an R-15 zoning district on the South side of Birch Lane, approximately 290 feet from the intersection of Old Orchard Road and Birch Lane. Said premises being known and designated on the tax map of the Village of Rye Brook as Parcel ID# 135.43-1-5.40; and WHEREAS, a duly advertised public hearing was held on May 4, 2021, at which time all those wishing to be heard were given such opportunity; and WHEREAS,the public hearing was closed on May 4, 2021; and WHEREAS,the proposed action is a Type II action pursuant to the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act and accordingly, no further environmental review is required; and WHEREAS, the Board, from the application, after viewing the premises and neighborhood concerned, and upon considering each of the factors set forth in Village Code § 250-13(G)(b)[2][a]-[e] of the Rye Brook Code, finds: 1) The variance WILL NOT create an adverse impact to the character of the neighborhood; 2) The benefit the Applicants seek CANNOT be achieved through another method, feasible for the Applicants to pursue, that does not require the variance; 3) The variance IS substantial; 4) The variance WILL NOT create any adverse impacts to the physical or environmental conditions of the neighborhood; and 5) The need for the variance IS self-created. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED that the said application for a rear yard setback variance of 12 feet where the minimum required rear yard setback is 40 feet pursuant to Village Code § 250-20.G(3) in connection with the proposed construction of a roof deck, on property located at 12 Birch Lane, is hereby GRANTED on the following conditions: 1) No permit or certificate of occupancy shall be issued until the Applicants have paid in full all application and consultant fees incurred by the Village in connection with the review of this application. 2) The roof deck shall remain open and unenclosed. 3) No staircase shall be constructed from the roof deck to the ground floor. Dated: May 4, 2021 Donald Moscato Mr. Don Moscato, Chairman Mr. Moscato called the roll: Steven Berger Voting: Aye Glenn Brettschneider Voting: Aye Jamie Schutzer Voting: Aye Joel Simon Voting: Aye Don Moscato Voting: Aye Ayes Nays Abstain Qy tt. VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK MAYOR 938 King Street, Rye Brook, N.Y. 10573 ADMINISTRATOR Paul S. Rosenberg (914)939-0668 Fax(914) 939-5801 Christopher J. Bradbury www.rvebrook.or¢ TRUSTEES BUILDING&FIRE Susan R.Epstein INSPECTOR Stephanie J. Fischer Michael J. Izzo David M. Heiser Jason A. Klein NOTICE OF HEARING ON APPLICATION Aotice is hereby given that the undersigned has filed an application to appear before the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Rye Brook. Application # 21-010 Applicant: Joshua Shaw& Melissa Shaw 12 Birch Lane Rye Brook, New York 10573 Applicant Proposes to: Construct roof deck and install spiral staircase. ZIt the premises known as 12 Birch Lane in the Village of Rye Brook,New York, situated on the South side of Birch Lane, approximately 290 feet from the intersection of Old Orchard Road and Birch Lane, designated and shown on the most current tax map as Parcel ID# 135.43-1-5.40,the applicant does hereby request a variance(s) from the following applicable section(s) of the Zoning Ordinance: 5250-20.G. (3) The minimum required rear yard setback is 40 feet. The proposed roof deck will result in a rear yard setback of 28 feet. Therefore, a rear yard setback variance of 12 feet is requested. 2 public hearing on said application will be held before the Village Zoning Board of Appeals on Tuesday, May 4,2021,at 8 o'clock p.m.at the Village of Rye Brook Offices located at 938 King Street, Rye Brook, NY 10573. Plans and other materials associated with the proposed application may be reviewed and downloaded via the Public Meetings& Video link from the Rye Brook website homepage and are available for review at the Building Department. The May 4,2021 Zoning Board of Appeals meeting will be held via videoconferencing and in-person, if permitted by the Governor's Executive Orders.The public will have an opportunity to see and hear the meeting live and provide comments. Further information on in-person attendance, if permitted, will be available on the Village website. I The public can watch the live meeting on Cable TV, online from the Public Meetings link on the Village website (www.ryebrook.orel, and through the Zoom App. If any interested members of the public would like to provide comments on an application, comments can be called in during the meeting at+1 (929)205-6099,Meeting ID:847 9706 4653 or provided through the written chat section of the Zoom meeting. Comments can also be provided via email before and during the meeting to Michael Izzo,Village Building Inspector,at mizzo(&rvebrook.ore. Please check the meeting Agenda posted on the Village website for further instructions to access the virtual meeting and for updated information. Plans and other materials associated with the proposed application may be reviewed and downloaded via the Public Meetings& Video link from the Rye Brook website. Dated: Christopher J. Bradbu illage Clerk G ayCV'�J�y CC�ta. w.W L VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK MAYOR 938 King Street, Rye Brook, N.Y. 10573 ADMINISTRATOR Paul S. Rosenberg (914)939-0668 Fax(914) 939-5801 Christopher J. Bradbury www.rvebrook.orre TRUSTEES BUILDING&FIRE Susan R. Epstein INSPECTOR Stephanie J. Fischer Michael J. Izzo David M. Heiser Jason A. Klein NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL Application # 21-010 March 1, 2021 Joshua Shaw& Melissa Shaw 12 Birch Lane Rye Brook, New York 10573 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that your application to amend approved plans dated, February 26, 2021, for the premises located at 12 Birch Lane, Parcel ID# 135.43-1-5.40, has been disapproved because of non- compliance with the following section(s)of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook: 5250-20.G. (3) The minimum required rear yard setback in 40 feet. The proposed roof deck will result in a rear yard setback of 28 feet. Please revise your plans to fully comply with the applicable section(s)of Village Code, or an appeal to this decision may be brought before the Village Zoning Board of Appeals(7_BA)in accordance with§250-13 and §250-40 of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook. Applications to appear before the ZBA are available at the Building Department or online at "-w.n ebrook.ore. Sincerely, Michael J. Izzo Building & Fire Inspector mizzona rvebrook.org BUILD T NT D VLLL 00MEK DD MAR 31 2021 ........ 3 PHONE- (914) 9 14) 939-5801 1 VILLAGE OF RYE, BROOK WWI .01-g L--.BUILDING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION TO THE, ZONING BoMw OF APPEALS Application Fee: $350.00 (%,<Paid Escrow Fee: $1,000.00 (i�id Date: 3-31-3-1 Subject Property: 2- /5 1'rc"fl 'L a h e- Parcel D)#: 43 - 1 40 zone: Property owner:CrO5yA U(, , — Phone#: SR!2u,1 Address: LQ nc� AJL.f21-QfJC—N Cell#:(3--(]) V z-z,- 7"3) 'oye M-5-3 Applicant: 00�ln 6. -L Address: _ D Phone lkNA ( '73-73,STCell 4: 4 email:T 6 S(� Attorney/Agent: Address: Phone 1h Cell#: The applicant named herein does hereby request an appeal from the decision made by the Building Inspector on an application dated 3 1 20_L?- I Chant: Deny: (L�- whereby the Building Inspector did: C the applicant a permit for 1. Type of Appeal: (VTvariance to the Zoning Ordinance ( )Interpretation of the Zoning Ordinance Certification for Continuation of a Nonconforming Use O Petinit. for Occupancy Permit for Use 2. This application relatesto: ( )Use ( )Area ( )Height (v)Setback ( )Other: In connection With: ( )A Proposed Building (�An Existing Building 3. Previous.Appeal(s), ( )Have (Have Not been made with respect to this particular decision of the Building Inspector, and ( )Have ( )Have Not been made with respect to any other previous decision(s) made by the Building Inspector regarding the subject property. List All Previous Zoning Appeals Either Granted or Denied Concerning thoRivi-noet P1.013el-tv a. A requested variance was KGranted )Denied on application# Z-o-,o)8 dated, 11131 7-Q �0 ,Al2Q for, _(L ._,X, I coa• Qel«� 4 c,10 5,�ftgfk b. A requested variance was ( )Granted )Denied on application# J dated, for, e. A requested variance was ( )Granted )Denied on application 11 dated, for, (Use additional sheets if necessary) 3/21/19 4. Alteration: IY worlc constitutes an alteration or extension to an existing building, describe briefly: C�Y'•eatian h y c,, 1 S-of t (e. 417) rr,t. �1 r /�C1( r S. Colystruetion Cost: What is the estimated cost of the proposed work? $ S0OC) '°b G. Reasons for Appeal.• A. An Area Variance to the Zoning Ordinance is requested because strict application of the ordinance would create the following hardship: i IUr�e. S i .5 S')n (mac[sr � <<✓r� �-�-cr� iPo� � !l•� w���.i t7 Li�,� `Lv 1✓�au�u_Sm�1 I t a('ecti. A-Q Loo/c uv� A'1 Vi Lw av�r� 42ac _ B. An Interpretation of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because: C. A Use Variance to the Zoning Ordinance is requested because strict application of the ordinance would create the following hardship: 2 (Use additional sheets if necessary) 3/21/19 7, Requested Zorlint,Appeals: I.Section of Rye Brook Code: § z,�Z� 2(� , G ! 3 '} Zoning Requirement: mu.Y, C'r2�� ►ued ,12Pa�y V Proposed Work: uSer� 92ex,,F 7-e(.r`. 0 n n � ~� � Cal�// el Y eclY- ... yC-'/n SQ-�B)IcIL Vgrlw7c•e Requested Variance:_ 119. 1/4111/uric /S H.Section of Rye Brook Code: § Zoning Requirement: Proposed Work Requested Variance: III. Section of Rye Brook Code: § Zoning Requirement: Proposed Work: Requested Variance: TV. Section of Rye Brook Code: § Zoning Requirement: Proposed Work: Requested Variance: V. Section of Rye Brook Code: § Zoning Requirement: Proposed Work: Requested Variance: 3 (Use addi(ioiiul sheets if necessary) 3/21/19 8. Item cltecldist of information from instruction sheet: Getter of Disapproval (�roperly Completed &Signed Original Zoning Variance Application V wo (2) Sets of Sealed Plans ( mn-refiwdable Application Fee of$350.00 crow Account Fee of$1,000.00 ( ) Provisions of any deeds, covenants, easements or restrictions affecting the kind of improvements allowed or prohibited upon the premises. O Notarized Mailer& Sign Affidavits, Area Map & Public Notification List (Please note tlint the notarized affidavits must be received by the Building Department by no Inter than the Thursday prior to the scheduled zoning hearing) ###+�M4444MWWWW444#W4444#44#WWW4444*44tW##rk###y##44#4##W##W4W#444#44WR4W##*##WWW##4####44#*W4##4##{4#*4#4#y# This application must include the notarized signature(s) of the applicant of record as well that of the legal owner(s) of the subject property in the spaces provided below. Any application not properly signed shall be deemed null and void and will be returned to the applicant. STATE OF NEW YORK,COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER Oby\' G 5 C. , -tet7k, 61-�— being duly sworn, deposes,and states that he/she is the applicant above named, (print"Me of individunl signing as the applicant) and further states that (s)he is the legal owner of the property to which this application pertains, or that (s)he is the for the legal owner and is duly authorized to make and file this application, (indicate architect,contractor,agent,nitonicy,ctc.) That all statemeuts contained herein are true to the best of his/her Imowledge and belief, and that any work performed or use conducted at the above captioned property will be in conformance with the determination of, and any conditions set by the Rye Brook Zoning Board of Appeals, with the details as set forth and contained in this application and in any accompanying approved plans and specifications, as well as in accordance with the New York State Uniform Fire Prevention & Building Code, the Code of the Village of Rye Brook and all other applicable laws, ordinances and regulations. Sworn to before me this Sworn to before me this day of 3 _ 3(Z� , 20� day of—.3/ !-j , 20_Z l Notary Public Notary Public ��Ig-llJatO-CS u of Pro -ty Owner 65;1 , Siguatw•e of.� licar Print Narne of Property Owner J Print Naine of Applicalrt 4 3/21/19 Village of Rye Brook enda �.•" Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting 4C"t<� Tuesday, May 4, 2021 at 8:00 PM Village Hall, 938 King Street ANNOUNCEMENT: The May 4, 2021 Zoning Board of Appeals meeting will be held via videoconferencing and in-person,if permitted by the Governor's Executive Orders. The public will have an opportunity to see and hear the meeting live and provide comments. Further information on in-person attendance,if permitted,will be available on the Village website. The public can watch the live meeting on Cable TV, online from the Public Meetings link on the Village website (www.ryebrook.org), and through the Zoom App. If any interested members of the public would like to provide comments on an application, comments can be called in during the meeting at +1 (929) 205-6099, Meeting ID: 847 9706 4653 or provided through the written chat section of the Zoom meeting. Comments can also be emailed before and during the public hearing to Michael Izzo,Village Building Inspector, at mizzo&yebrook.org. Please check the Village website for updates. INSTRUCTIONS TO ACCESS THE VIRTUAL MEETING: If you have a computer, tablet or smartphone,you can register, log in and see the video and hear the audio of the live session. You can access the Zoom meeting at htips://us02web.zoom.us/i/84797064653 and clicking on "Join a Meeting" and enter Meeting ID: 847 9706 4653 (no password required). You can also call in to the ZOOM meeting at +1 (929) 205-6099,when prompted, enter 847 9706 4653#. On the evening of May 4,2021, 5 minutes before 8:00 p.m., log in with your computer, smartphone or telephone. You will be placed on hold until the meeting starts. Questions about accessing the Zoom videoconference should be emailed to amarshaUgrryebrook.org. 1. ITEMS: 1.1. #21-009 (Adjourned from 41612021) Joseph Sandarciero III & Stephanie Sandarciero 112 Country Ridge Drive Construct new rear patio with fire pit and sitting walls. Approvals; Adjournment Aye; DM MI Nay; SB SF GB K&B JDS JS DH 1 t E. DRY Village of Rye Brook Agenda Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting <<� Tuesday, May 4, 2021 at 8:00 PM Village Hall, 938 King Street 1.2. #21-010 Joshua Shaw& Melissa Shaw 12 Birch Lane Construct roof deck and install spiral staircase. Mail Affidavit Sign Affidavit V Approvals; Adjournment Aye; Nay; 1.3. #21-013 (Application 1Vithdrawn) Michael Medd&Theresa Medd 75 Winding Wood Road Legalize screened in porch constructed under Building Permit #765 dated 3/27/1961. DM MI SB f SF GB K&B JDS JS DH 2 BR Village of Rye Brook Agenda Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting Tuesday, May 4, 2021 at 8:00 PM Village Hall, 938 King Street 1.4. #20-012 David Morrisey& Carin Morrisey 21 Woodland Drive Request extension of approval of Zoning variance,Village Code 250-13.H. Approvals; Adjournment Aye; Nay; 2. SUMMARY APPROVALS: 2.1. Approval of March 2, 2021 Zoning Board Summary Approvals; Adjournment Aye; Nay; 2.2. Approval of April 6, 2021 Zoning Board Summary Approvals; Adjournment Aye; Nay; DM MI SB SF GB K&B JDS JS DH 3 APPROVED '�ATIr ut,e l o� Village of Rye Brook Agenda �[�,7 Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting V Tuesday, May 4,2021 at 8:00 PM Village Hall, 938 King Street JUN ` 2 2021 May 4,2021 Minutes VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK BUILDING DEPARTMENT ANNOUNCEMENT: The May 4,2021 Zoning Board of.appeals meeting will be held via videoconferencing and in-person, if permitted by the Governor's Executive Orders. The public will have an opportunity to see and hear the meeting live and provide comments. Further information on in-person attendance,if permitted,will be available on the Village website. The public can watch the live meeting on Cable TV, online from the Public Meetings link on the Village website (www.ryebrook.org), and through the Zoom App. If any interested members of the public would like to provide comments on an application, comments can be called in during the meeting at +1 (929) 205- 6099, Meeting ID: 847 9706 4653 or provided through the written chat section of the Zoom meeting. Comments can also be ernailed before and during the public hearing to Michael Izzo,Village Building Inspector, at mizzo@xyebrook.org. Please check the Village website for updates. INSTRUCTIONS TO ACCESS THE VIRTUAL MEETING: If you have a computer,tablet or smartphone,you can register,log in and see the video and heat the audio of the live session.You can access the Zoom meeting at h s: us02web.zoom.us 47970 4653 and clicking on"Join a Meeting" and enter Meeting ID: 847 9706 4653 (no password required). You can also call in to the ZOOM meeting at +1 (929) 205-6099,when prompted, enter 847 9706 4653#. On the evening of May 4, 2021, 5 minutes before 8:00 p.m., log in with your computer, smartphone or telephone. You will be placed on hold until the meeting starts. Questions about accessing the Zoom videoconference should be emailed to amarshallgrryebrook.org. Don Moscato Very good. Okay,welcome to the May 4r'meeting of the Rye Brook Zoning Board of Appeals.We have a full board this evening. We also have Village Council Drew Gamils,Board of Trustees liaison David Heiser. And video up in the stars is being brought to you by Fred Seifert. Drew Gamils will be controlling the meeting.And as an initial start,please,if you are not on this particular application,please silence or mute your microphones so that we have minimal,minimal static.The first application this evening is application number 21-009 adjourned from the April 6 meeting,Joseph Sandarciero III and Stephanie Sandarciero 112 Country Ridge Drive, construct a new rear patio with fire pit and sitting walls. Okay, I believe the architect, Mr. Sakofsky is ready to go. So please start your presentation and concentrate on the difference between the last week last month and this month application? - 1 - httPs:llotter.ai 1. ITEMS: 1.1. #21-009 (Ad ourned from 4/6/2021) Joseph Sandarciero III& Stephanie Sandarciero 112 Country Ridge Drive Construct new rear patio with fire pit and sitting walls. Evan Sakofsky Absolutely. Sure. And I'm going to share my screen. One second. Okay, so those are the project drawings, the current ones. So yeah,so we,you know,we took stock of all the comments that we received last time and, you know, certainly wanted to heed them as much as possible. We did start out actually by reaching out to Mike Nowak, just to see what his thoughts would be on this project. And his opinion really was,you know,if we're going to do drainage,he just wanted to see engineering on that. So, the homeowner did,in fact,reach out to an engineer,got pricing for their services,got pricing for what we thought might be the cost to do drainage from his contractor. And it was just very cost prohibitive for him. So,we,you know, we're really sort of hoping that instead of going that route,if we made some concessions on the coverage, which is what we have done that perhaps that would you know,appease the board and appease your concerns. So,what we've done that's different from what we presented the first time is first,we've eliminated a few things that were existing on the site, the homeowner is going to remove this shed,which is worthy of 74 square feet of coverage. He is also going to remove this flagstone walk here it's small, but it's worth 16 square feet of coverage.And then lastly,we shrunk the patio itself that we're proposing It was originally 399 square feet,we've taken it down to 370. So,you know,yes, all told,we are,you know,we had an existing condition that was over coverage. And we're still over coverage. But we're only proposing a net gain of 280 square feet. So,you know,we feel like it's a modest project.We feel that in terms of the layout of the new work here,that we've made this as small as we possibly can,while still retaining the function that the homeowner hopes to attain from it.And we hope you will agree that this is now modest and reasonable. The homeowner has many letters of support from his neighbors who all agree that they feel also that it's modest and reasonable. And yeah, I would love to hear your feedback now on this. Don Moscato Okay, thank you. Evan Sakofsky Sure. Michael Izzo Mr. Chairman, can I ask a quick question? Don Moscato Sure. - 2- Transcribed by https://otter.ai Michael Izzo With regards to the extent that the applicant and his design professional met with the engineers,what was, what was discussed in terms of, of stormwater management?Was it full capture?Did you look at a partial capture?What,you know,what were the parameters that you went over with the Village Engineer? Evan Sakofsky With the village engineer?Well,he wanted to have test pits you know,done. I mean,it basically sounded Eke he wanted full engineering for the property. Michael Izzo Yeah,because the code requires full capture,but did you explore partial capture? Evan Sakofsky I think he was. I think he was amenable to partial capture. But the,you know,the issue was, once we started reaching out to engineers, the way that they work,it didn't seem like they were going to work any other way than a full study of the site.And so you know, that in combination with the drainage that would be would be required there. It just felt very prohibited from a cost perspective. Michael Izzo So, a partial system was not priced out? Evan Sakofsky I don't know what in terms of the system. I couldn't speak for what the contract or price there,but you know,I think the anticipation was that we were going to need at least a few storage tanks, a few cultecs. Michael Izzo Thank you. Don Moscato Okay. I would like to apologize. I did not introduce the last speaker,Mickey Izzo the Building Inspector for the Village of Rye Brook,so I apologize for that. Okay. Do any of the board members want to make a comment on the revised plan submitted by the architect? Evan Sakofsky Sure. Steve Berger I have a couple of questions. You're going to remove the shed that contains the pool equipment. - 3- Transcribed by https://otter.ai Evan Sakofsky No, the pool equipment is behind the shed. That's just a storage shed. Steve Berger Okay, fine.That answers that question. Evan Sakofsky Sure. Steve Berger And then I'm looking at the pics,the photographs. So, the flagstone patio,there's a door that looks like it comes up a bunch of steps. Is that where the flagstone is going? Or is it going near the chimney? Evan Sakofsky I'm sorry, are we talking about what's being removed? Steve Berger Yes. Evan Sakofsky It's a walk that extends off of the back of the house. Steve Berger So, there's a door there that looks like it comes from the lower level. Right? Evan Sakofsky It's not that no,that's,that's access to?Well,I guess maybe the homeowner could speak better to that because I'm not sure exactly where it goes.But I assume it goes to the basement. Steve Berger But that's not where the patio is going? Evan Sakofsky No,that is not. Steve Berger Okay, so the steps are staying obviously, because they have them coming out that door. Evan Sakofsky Correct. - 4- Transcribed by https://otter.ai Steve Berger And where is the flagstone walk that's being removed? Evan Sakofsky It's right over here. So,it just comes off of the steps that lead out from the main level of the house. So, these steps have to stay because the floor level is higher than grade. Steve Berger That's what I'm trying to understand. Evan Sakofsky Correct. Steve Berger Okay, because I don't even see the flagstone walk in the pictures. Evan Sakofsky Let's see if I have one. Jamie Schutzer Seems you got to go to page 17. Steve Berger 17. Jamie Schutzer Yeah,it looks like there's two pictures, because what I'm seeing is there's the chimney. Steve Berger Right. Jamie Schutzer So,if you go to the top picture. Steve Berger Yeah, Jamie Schutzer It's like there's a sliding glass door.A couple of steps. - 5- Transcribed by https://otter.ai Steve Berger Okay, thank you,Jamie. Jamie Schutzer And then you see to the right is where you were talking about. Steve Berger Yeah,right. Okay. So,the steps,those steps will stay. Evan Sakofsky They have right,they have to stay. Steve Berger Right. So,they're going to come out of that and walk on grass to the flagstone patio? Evan Sakofsky Correct.There would be lawn there. That is correct. Steve Berger Okay. Joel Simon Is that a pathway,is the flagstone pathway, or what is that exactly?It's a little hard to tell from the picture. Evan Sakofsky Well,it's a path. Yeah,it's a pathway that currently just leads onto the lawn right now. But it's not necessary. I mean,look, obviously this portion that's being removed is a modest,you know,piece of coverage,but it's still coverage nonetheless. Don Moscato Glenn, do you have any comments for the architect? Glenn Brettschneider No,no,I mean,I appreciate the,you know, the attempt to kind of balance what the homeowner wants and what we want. I don't,I actually think to do what they want to do there's not much more they could take away. Really,I think,I think they kind of you know, I think they've kind of done almost the best they could to make the walkway,you know to make the patio usable. Right. And so,I appreciate the effort. - 6- Transcribed by https://otter.ai Evan Sakofsky Thank you.And as a reminder,you know, because we didn't,I didn't mention it yet today but in terms of the reason for this patio again is just,you know,yes, obviously there's a patio around this pool,but anytime you want to entertain he has young children. I mean this is a major safety hazard here. And it's very inaccessible to the house. And that's the whole reason why this,this project is being proposed in the first place. It really is just about safety for his family,guests that he might be for entertaining. Joel Simon Question, and this was probably asked last month I just don't recall,is there any issue or any concerns currently in that location as for drain as to drainage?Are there any problems? Evan Sakofsky I mean, the homeowner certainly hasn't reported to me that he has any issues and I would assume that the support that he has from his neighbors would indicate that they don't feel that there's any runoff issues on their property due to his property currently. Don Moscato You okay Joel,with that? Joel Simon Yeah,it is what it is. Don Moscato Okay,yeah. I'm coming at it from, from a different perspective I guess, from my colleagues, and I would prefer the original design,as proposed last month with modified water capture.And I think it would be unrealistic to demand because I don't think we can demand a total capture because it is under the 400 square feet. However,I think that by chopping off a little bit of the walkway and taking away the storage shed and reducing the size it's actually taking away from the overall aesthetics of the site.And I personally would prefer that, and as much as they are impinging on the impervious coverage, that they make some effort at water capture,not a complete water capture,but some effort at water capture.And that's sort of the approach that that I'm taking, I recognize that it would involve a cost, but that cost is going to be a trade off with getting the site as they originally requested it,versus expending those funds to capture the water that is going to be created,run off by the new impervious coverage. Glenn Brettschneider I actually shouldn't ask this, at the risk of maybe embarrassing myself a little bit. But when they talk about water capture,you know,we've talked about that over the years and what it's been involving what does that encompass? I actually don't know the physical requirements of what has to be done. Michael Izzo Who are you directing that question to Glenn? - 7- Transcribed by https://otter.ai Glenn Brettschneider Anybody who can answer that. Don Moscato I would ask you to answer that. Michael Izzo Okay,well, stormwater capture involves dry wells, or cultecs that are buried in the ground,and pipes such that they catch runoff from impervious surfaces and reintroduce the water slowly back into the ground. And oftentimes,with larger systems, they'll have to be supplemented with something that's called a pop up emitter,which is when the tank gets full, a little valve pops up and lets the water run out over the surface. So,you get sort of a, it's a combination,letting the water into the ground below grade, and also letting some water run out, sort of gently at grade. So there's,you know, and there are, there are unlimited size capacities that you can have,because you can daisy chain these things together to capture large amounts of water, or on properties that are restricted, because they don't have a lot of clear area, either there,you know, not unlike this one that has a lot of coverage or driveway issues,you know, smaller systems that would capture less water. And obviously,the smaller the system,the less expensive the system, and the larger the system, the more expensive the system,but in order to install any kind of system that's going to work, soil samples need to be taken,you need to be able to know what type of dirt or material is in the ground. Will the stormwater system work,given the results of whatever the you know, the test of the soils are and then the system gets designed accordingly based on how much capture you know you're looking to achieve. Glenn Brettschneider Okay, thanks,Mickey. That was very helpful. So,I guess my next question would be would they know what needs to be done if a partial recapture is even necessary?I mean,is it possible that it wouldn't be needed? Or is it something that you know,Don you'd like because they're over the amount of square footage for the impervious surface or is it possible wouldn't even matter. Joel Simon Glenn,if I can jump in on that? Glenn Brettschneider Yeah, Joel Simon If I'm understanding correctly what Sakofsky said before,this ties in to what Don was requesting,is that whether it's partial or full, their point was that to bring in the engineer to make the evaluations,to make the determinations was just from their perspective,completely cost prohibitive. So, and I agree with Don, that's the preferable way to go. But I don't think from the, from the resident's perspective,it's feasible for them. So, the options become, either it doesn't get approved, or it gets approved with these modifications. - 8- Transcribed by https://otter.ai Glenn Brettschneider So theoretically,you can bring in an engineer, and they would say,and you could spend the money and the resources,and they could come in and say, by the way, you don't need anything for this. Joel Simon That I guess that's one possibility or that, or you can spend a lot of money on engineer.And then he says, Okay, now the next step is x,y, z,which is even more money. Glenn Brettschneider Right? Okay. Joel Simon It's yeah. So that's why I'm saying that. I don't think what Don was suggesting makes the most sense. I don't think it's feasible, at least from what from what the architect was saying before,in terms of economics. Joseph Sandarciero III If I can jump in,I did reach out to an engineer, and the prices were close to$7,000.Just to tell me what I may or may not have needed. Glenn Brettschneider And that was my next question. Joseph Sandarciero III That was a burden on our end. Glenn Brettschneider Right. Joseph Sandarciero III Just can't do it. It doesn't Glenn Brettschneider Right. Joel Simon No,no,that's understandable. - 9- Transcribed by https://otter.ai Joseph Sandarciero III We did try. I just,you know, just so you guys know that. Glenn Brettschneider Right,that was really my question. Joel Simon That would make sense in terms of cost,if you know, for something like that, or that just to maybe try a different engineer. Joseph Sandarciero III I called three people, one called us back. And I went with the one because we were kind of on a time crunch.And they were reputable,Ahneman Kirby,I think is the name was and that was the number that they came at us with. Glenn Brettschneider Yeah,they're like architects these days,there's so busy they don't can you back. Joseph Sandarciero III And their timeframe to do everything,I guess,because everyone's doing projects was,you know, a month and a half,two months out just to get your answer. Joel Simon In my point of view, and this is just my take on this is,I'll take,you know, the applicant's word that economically, the water capture is not feasible. I think they've made a pretty strong effort in,you know, modifying the plan. And if we're not looking at an area where there apparently is any type of current water issue, and I think they've made a good effort Jamie Schutzer I'm in agreement with Joel. Don Moscato Okay, then. Are there any other questions of the architect? Okay,I'd like to recognize the letters of support that have come in. Drew,do we have to officially announce that or is it just enough to say that several additional letters have come in in support of the application? Drew Gamils I would state the names and addresses if you can Don,I don't have the letters in front of me. Do you? - 10- Transcribed by https://otter.ai Don Moscato Nor do L I just had a reference that letters came in,but I don't think I ever got the actual letters other than those in the original application. But I believe Tara said that there were several at least six or seven additional letters that came in. Glenn Brettschneider Yep.All in support. Don Moscato Yes. Okay. Is there anyone on the connection who wants to speak in favor of the application? Or anyone who wants to speak against the application?Please unmute your mic and introduce yourself. Okay,there apparently being none. Could I have a motion to close the public hearing? Steven Berger So, moved. Don Moscato Second, Glenn Brettschneider Second. Don Moscato Okay. public hearing is closed. Okay.Judging from the comments that we heard,apparently,we're comfortable or members of the board are comfortable with the modifications that have been that have been put in.What I'd like to do is go through,go through the five factors and just try and do. Okay. There it is, I'm looking for the actual resolution. Let me go through the five factors. Do you feel that this application will have an adverse impact to the character of the neighborhood? I don t think it's a character issue. Glenn Brettschneider No. Don Moscato No, okay. The benefit the applicant seeks cannot be achieved through another method feasible for the applicants to pursue that does not require the variance. Glenn Brettschneider Correct. Jamie Schutzer Correct. - 11 - Transcribed by https://otter.ai Don Moscato Okay. The variance is substantial. Joel Simon Yes. Steve Berger Yes. Don Moscato The variance will not create any adverse impacts to the physical or environmental conditions of the neighborhood. Jamie Schutzer Correct. Steve Berger Will not. Don Moscato Okay. All right. I'm still shaky on that one,you know, in terms of not capturing the water and the need for the variance is self-created. Glenn Brettschneider Yes. Don Moscato Is everybody comfortable with that. Glenn Brettschneider Yes. Don Moscato Okay,let me go ahead and read the resolution. - 12- Transcribed by https:Hotter.ai RESOLUTION WHEREAS, application has been made to the Zoning Board by Joseph Sandarciero III & Stephanie Sandarciero (the "Applicants") for a total impervious coverage variance of 766 square feet where the maximum allowable total impervious coverage is 7,296 square feet pursuant to Village Code 250-37.C,in connection with the proposed new rear patio with fire pit and sitting walls, on property located at 112 Country Ridge Drive,in an R-15 zoning district on the west side of Country Ridge Drive, approximately 300 feet from the intersection of Dorchester Drive and Country Ridge Drive. Said premises being known and designated on the tax map of the Village of Rye Brook as Parcel ID# 129.66-1-10; and WHEREAS, the property has an existing non-conforming total impervious coverage of 7,782 square feet; and WHEREAS, a duly advertised public hearing was held April 6, 2021 and May 4,2021, at which time all those wishing to be heard were given such opportunity; and WHEREAS, the public hearing was closed on May 4,2021; and WHEREAS, the proposed action is a Type II action pursuant to the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act and accordingly, no further environmental review is required; and WHEREAS, the Board, from the application, after viewing the premises and neighborhood concerned, and upon considering each of the factors set forth in Village Code § 250-13(G)(b)[2][a]-[e] of the Rye Brook Code, finds: 1) The variance WILL NOT create an adverse impact to the character of the neighborhood; 2) The benefit the Applicants seek CANNOT be achieved through another method,feasible for the Applicants to pursue, that does not require the variance; 3) The variance IS substantial; - 13 - Transcribed by https:Hotter.ai 4) The variance WILL NOT create any adverse impacts to the physical or environmental conditions of the neighborhood;and 5) The need for the variance IS self-created. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the said application for a for a total impervious coverage variance of 766 square feet where the maximum allowable total impervious coverage is 7,296 square feet pursuant to Village Code � 250-37.C, in connection with the proposed new rear patio with fire pit and sitting walls, on property located at 112 Country Ridge Drive, is hereby GRANTED on the following conditions: 1) No permit or certificate of occupancy shall be issued until the Applicants have paid in full all application and consultant fees incurred by the Village in connection with the review of this application. Don Moscato Okay, are we comfortable with that? Steve Berger Yes. Glenn Brettschneider Yes. Don Moscato Let's vote then, Steve? Steve Berger Yes. Don Moscato Glenn? Glenn Brettschneider Yes. Don Moscato J amie? - 14- Transcribed by https://otter.ai Jamie Schutzer Yes. Don Moscato Joel? Joel Simon Yes. Don Moscato Don is going to say no on this one. So,the application is approved, four yeses, one no. Congratulations and good luck with the modified plan. Thank you very much for making that effort. Evan Sakofsky Thank you,we appreciate it. Joseph Sandarciero III Thank you. Don Moscato Good. Okay. Next application is application number 21-010 Joshua Shaw and Melissa Shaw 12 Birch Lane, construct roof deck and installing new spiral staircase. Okay,who's going to be making the presentation? 1.2. #21-010 Joshua Shaw&Melissa Shaw 12 Birch Lane Construct roof deck and install spiral staircase. John Scarlato I guess I will,John, I will be doing it. Don Moscato Okay. Okay, fine John. John Scarlato Just share the screen.Are you seeing my screen, or did I do something wrong? - 15- Transcribed by https://otter.ai Don Moscato No,I see your screen. John Scarlato Okay, so we were here a few months ago for the covering over the deck, over the patio,which we got approval for.And then the homeowner was thinking about it,because from the second floor of their house, they can see the Long Island Sound, I kind of have a clear view to that. They started thinking that part of this maybe should really be an upper level deck. So,we, so they decided that we ask the building department and they directed us back to get approval for the change, since we had gotten a zoning variance,because this roof sits in the rear yard setback. So that's why we're back. So,this is the master bedroom,the concept here is to do a roof deck just off this end of it,lining up with the two columns here. And the idea was to put a spiral stair way up from the deck. Now some of the neighbor's kind of didn't like the idea of the stairs and having such access to it. So,the new concept is to not do the stairway and just have the doors off the master bedroom. So it's a deck off the master and there's no stairway going up to it.The owner can correct me if I'm wrong. Joshua Shaw Yeah,no,no, that was perfect. Hey,hi,everybody.Thanks for seeing us tonight. So,John has it right I think one of the best features is the Long Island Sound,I grew up in Rye Brook,I've been here my whole life 45 years. Don Moscato Excuse me,please introduce yourself so that our archives can record it properly. Joshua Shaw Sorry,Josh Shaw,and my wife,Melissa Shaw. Don Moscato Thank you. Joshua Shaw Good to see everybody.As I was saying,I grew up in Rye Brook. This was a farm when I grew up here. I think by far one of the best features of our house is that we get to see the Long Island Sound from the top floor. And when we got the first approval and started building, as John said,it dawned on me,we're in my in the master suite now that it's too good of an opportunity to have a little sitting area off the top where we see the Long Island Sound,why not go back and see if we can get a small area for sitting and enjoying the sunrise. So,we amended, submitted it two of the three,we have three neighbors that surround the house who said no,no problem at all go for full support. One of our neighbors,who's on the line with us tonight came over to review it,we had a very productive conversation, their concern was, hey,if it's easy access,it could be a lot of noise. You could have big parties up there. We said that was not our intent at all. No worries,we'll just take away the staircase and submit it with just access from the top floor,if that's going to - 16- Transcribed by https://otter.ai make, make it better.And so we're fine doing that if the if the board will approve it. And we just want to keep the space so that we could access it and see the Long Island Sound. Joel Simon Do you have a door there? Joshua Shaw Yeah,we'd have to open up. Where am I,in the suite. Now we just have to take the windows and make it a door to access it. John Scarlato Which my note actually says it's a new French door in place of window. Don Moscato John can you just share with us the size of that new deck? John Scarlato Sure. Okay, so it's about 12 feet deep. It's a little shorter than what the roof is.And it's about 16 feet wide, because I'm lining up with the column. Don Moscato Okay, now,if I'm not mistaken, one of the comments, one of the neighbors was concerned about the possibility of more than a couple of Adirondack chairs sitting out there with a little table for lattes. Joshua Shaw Yeah. Don Moscato Has that concern been discussed in conversations with your neighbors? Joshua Shaw Yeah,we have no problem putting two Adirondacks in a table there. It's literally meant for me and Melissa to enjoy. So,if that's going to make it easier for everybody and, and set up for approval,we're totally fine taking away the staircase and keeping it to those pieces of furniture. Don Moscato One of the problems stems from once an approval is given the Zoning Board loses all control over use of the property, and then it becomes an enforced,administrative enforcement issue. And you can't expect the Village running around there saying hey,look,it's not being used in the way it was originally presented. That's, that's really the only concern I have. - 17- Transcribed by https://otter.ai Joshua Shaw I can understand that. Don Moscato And I'm not quite sure how,how that can be addressed? John Scarlato Well, I would have to pull the railing. I mean,we did it because we kind of put the railing to the edge like or Eke slightly in from the edge just for the look. So,I mean,I would have to,we would have to pull the railing in for that. Joshua Shaw But just real quick,doesn't the fact that we'd be removing the staircase,you'd have to walk into the house up a flight through the master bedroom into the master suite closet to get out doesn't that give some sense of confidence that if there's no staircase to get there,and you have to walk through our master bedroom into our master closet? Joel Simon I tend to agree with that,when you first mentioned the staircase, my initial thought was not a good thing. And I think because then it becomes a party deck. Joshua Shaw Like for your kids. Joel Simon Right. Joshua Shaw And they were like your kids are good now. But you know... Joel Simon Once the staircase is removed it,it really just becomes something for the master bedroom to utilize. And I think that really limits its use. And Don, I would,you know,put our usual condition that it has to remain as a deck,it can't be built. Don Moscato Yeah,I would ask Drew to comment on the nature of the wording of any condition of that nature. Because yes,that's the obvious,the obvious concern that we always have with these applications.Also,you know, once you know, once the variance is granted,in the event that a house is sold,whoever comes in can do whatever they want,you know,in terms of rearranging the deck chairs,so to speak.And but I think Joel, Joel's point is valid once that staircase is removed,it certainly makes the application more attractive. - 18- Transcribed by https://otter.ai Glenn Brettschneider Did you have conditions on the prior variance granted? John Scarlato That's a good question. Glenn Brettschneider We ask good questions. John Scarlato I believe that it had to stay open. Glenn Brettschneider Okay,yeah, I just wanted to make sure that we do because usually we will put a condition on something. And normally it's you can't build on top of it. But John Scarlato Or enclose it. Glenn Brettschneider So that we know what that condition was. And if we're looking it up,I do want to say that Josh and Melissa lived across the street for me for a while. And I actually trust they will be quiet because not once with young kids,were they ever, ever loud or too loud.And they had a pool too. So,I never heard them so. So,I could tell Roberta and Peter, at least from what I knew,when they were younger.They were pretty quiet. Joshua Shaw Thanks, Glen. Don Moscato Well,you never know who's going to be in there next.Judging by the number of new people who have moved into this area within the last year,you know,the amount of turnover is actually shocking,you know, in terms of new people coming in, and all of a sudden doing a couple of$100,000 of renovations after they come in. Jamie Schutzer Don,I have a question. So,if we approve it like this without the stairs... Don Moscato Yeah. - 19- Transcribed by https://otter.ai Jamie Schutzer I assume then that would eliminate any future owner to be able to say, oh,let me put in a staircase without needing to come back to the Zoning Board. Is that correct? Joel Simon Or do we need a condition for that? Jamie Schutzer Yeah. Joel Simon That's a good point. Drew Gamils Yep. I had that exact same thought. Steve Berger I think that's a good point too. Drew Gamils Yep. I had that same thought.And I anticipated that's where you guys were going so Don when you review the resolution,I would not read the part that says spiral staircase.We'll take that out of the final resolution, and we will add in a condition about the deck remaining open and unenclosed and about no staircase being constructed from that top deck to the ground patio. Glenn Brettschneider What about any prior condition?Did we look into that from last time? Drew Gamils I'm trying to locate that resolution right now. Unfortunately,it wasn't uploaded on the agenda page. I'll find it while you guys keep talking. Don Moscato Worst case scenario it would just be redundant then,right Glenn? Glenn Brettschneider Yeah,I just want to see what it says. So that we know. John Scarlato I believe you condition that it had to stay open. I have my memory serves. - 20- Transcribed by https://otter.ai Glenn Brettschneider That would make sense. John Scarlato Because that's what you normally do on porches that go into backyard setback. Glenn Brettschneider Right. Don Moscato Okay. All right. John Scarlato But I think if anybody wanted to do anything here anyway,the FAR of the house is probably too big too. So, I think, but you usually put that in any way. But I think if anybody wanted to do anything like enclose anyway,I think they'd have to be back for you for an FAR variance anyway. Don Moscato Well, this one is just the rear yard setback issue. John Scarlato But if somebody tried to enclose it, that would become an FAR issue. Joshua Shaw I have a question. Sorry to interrupt, just so I understand. We're not selling anytime soon. We've got young kids. But the condition means that when we sell the house 10, 20 years from now,the sale will state,it will be very clear to the new owner,they cannot build without approval, correct? John Scarlato No. Glenn Brettschneider No,you'd have to look it up. Glenn Brettschneider Right. Steve Berger That would be in the title search. - 21 - Transcribed by https://otter.ai Glenn Brettschneider Yeah,you could tell them,you could put in your contract of sale if you wanted. But they don't. Joshua Shaw They'll do a tide search. John Scarlato They would have to research it and figure it out. So,if they hired somebody to do work to the house. They should go back and look at past variances and see what the conditions were. Joshua Shaw Or we'll just put it in the contract. John Scarlato Nobody is going to pick it up that quickly. Joshua Shaw We have no problem putting it in the contract then. Don Moscato Okay,very good. Okay, does anyone have any further questions of John? Oh. Peter Gottlieb Do we have a comment about the size? Roberta Gottlieb Not at this point. Peter Gottlieb Oh, ok. Glenn Brettschneider Is that Peter and Roberta? Don Moscato Yeah.Do you want us to hear what you're saying? Glenn Brettschneider You keep talking amongst yourselves.We can hear you. - 22- Transcribed by https:Hotter.ai Roberta Gottlieb Yeah. Peter Gottlieb I mean, the only real issue we had,I mean,look, the staircase was an issue. Steve Berger Peter, I'm going to save you time before Don says this,introduce yourself. Peter Gottlieb Sure, I'm Peter Gottlieb and Roberta Gottlieb.Thank you. Glenn Brettschneider Thanks Peter. Peter Gottlieb So look,we're fine without the staircase.The fact is,that egress is going to be through the master bedroom, which makes it even more complicated.The only issue we have is just the size.And as we,as I said,in my email our master bedroom is parallel with that deck.And if you've ever been in Red Roof, the houses on top of each other,it's all house, no land.And we're just very,very close. So that's going to extend now,if it comes full 12 feet out,it's basically 12 feet less 40 is 28 feet from our property line.And as we met,when we met with Melissa and Josh,last week, or two weeks ago,whatever,we told him,basically,we hear everything that goes on in their backyard, even the previous neighbors, and what have you. And not that we're listening. But our only concern is noise. And here's the scenario,Josh and Melissa are away for the weekend, and their kids are home.And they have kids over and they know that mom and dad can't catch them running into the master bedroom.And they go on this, this 12 by 16 deck to hang out and their friends are in the pool and they yell down. I mean,that's our only, only issue. Glenn Brettschneider Peter, are you concerned about?Are you concerned about length versus width?You know,you say size I'm not sure what you mean, by that. If I could ask you to be more specific. If you have a specific concern about the size. Peter Gottlieb My specific concern is size means more people. You know, to add,you know that's all I mean.More people can gather and look, I emphatically understand what Melissa and Joshua saying and it's not going to be them. But,you know,we have kids and I mean, our kids are out but I'm just saying kids do what kids do. Joel Simon Peter, I just want to jump in. The concerns you're raising, aren't they existent regardless of the size? They have a small upper deck. It's,you know,it's the same thing of a kid going up there yelling down or even if - 23- Transcribed by https://otter.ai there's no deck and they're having a party in the backyard because mom and dad are away for the weekend. And they're yelling around to each other around the pool. Joel Simon Is it really the deck that's going to create the noise? Peter Gottlieb If there are less people you know,if three or four can congregate versus 10 or 12. That's what that's all I'm saying. Joel Simon Yeah. I'm just not sure that I see that the deck creates the more people though. Joshua Shaw Yeah,Joel's point is that we could have the same number of people on the on the existing patio,we have now and at the pool,versus some would be higher up. I understand what Peter's saying. I think we've eliminated that concern by removing the staircase and making them go through a maze to get there. But I,I think Joel's right,I mean,if the kids are going to have a party,party, and they're not, but if they did. Joel Simon Now if your concern was that you don't want to be seeing them,you know, from the,you know, the eye level view onto the deck, that I could understand. That's going to have, regardless of the size, and that's any deck. I think the noise issue exists,regardless. Peter Gottlieb No,no. I mean,the noise,but the fact is of the novelty of the deck. I'm just saying the decks up here,pools down here, that's all. I mean,you know,it's not like,right now it's a flat patio.That anyway, but I'm just saying, the concern is the decks up here,the pools down here,and the kids go up there to say,you know, hey,let's go look at the fire. Let's go look at the fireworks,whatever. I mean, that's I'm just sort of speaking out what the scenarios are,that's all. Glenn Brettschneider Here's my thinking just out loud. See, 12 by 16 deck,if it even if they reduced it to eight by 10. Right. You know,theoretically,Josh and Melissa's kids could come up five, eight of them and stand in that area. I don't think the size really is the issue here. In my opinion. I think the spiral staircase did eliminate something. I'd see if you don't want the deck at all. I see that. I could understand that as being something that makes sense. It seems to me it's the deck is really the issue,in my opinion, not necessarily the size. And I understand if you don't like the deck at all, I'm not sure that making it even smaller. - 24- Transcribed by https://otter.ai Roberta Gottlieb I think that eliminating the staircase was the compromise that we came to because,um,you're right. I mean, we would rather than not have any deck, but our compromise was to eliminate the staircase.Yeah. Peter Gottlieb I mean, I guess Roberta's right,it's. Glenn Brettschneider Yeah,as I said,I could see, you know, I think the chances of having everyone up there anyway, on a smaller deck still, to me looking down at the pool is still as good with the size of that deck. So again, I don't see it as a size issue. I'm more comfortable if you said,I don't like it at all.And that. But I keep asking them,right. I know,I makes no sense I think asking them to make it even smaller.And I guess it's lined up with it with the columns and everything. So, again,it's to me,it's not a size issue it's a deck issue at all. And I'm sure that I would want that if I was a neighbor. But you know what,maybe I'd be fine with it too,if they invite me to the pool. So again,I don't think it's the size issue at all. Joshua Shaw When are you going to the Gottlieb's for wine,people? Glenn Brettschneider Right.Yeah,yeah. Peter Gottlieb Eliminating the staircase,I think is fine. Glenn Brettschneider Yeah. I mean,when you get Yeah. Don Moscato So, Glenn,it's in your case,it's a binary and not a continuous issue, right?The size doesn't matter whether it's this or that,but it's either yes or no, Glenn Brettschneider That that's kind of how I feel. I don't think the size is it,like if they reduced it, and they wanted to,that doesn't sway me. What you know,if they said,we're going to keep it as that size. You're right,it, to me,it's either you allow them to have it with that size with the compromise that they made, or you choose not to let them do it. It's,you know,again,you're right. I don't think size is the issue here for me. Don Moscato John,can I ask you two questions. One, Glenn just touched on earlier, from an aesthetic issue, and I know you're always concerned about this from your perspective. How would you shrink the size? If you had to? - 25- Transcribed by https://otter.ai And secondly,if you construct the existing deck as proposed,what load bearing issues are you considering in terms of the number of people because I've been on decks that have wobbled when a certain number of people got on them.They were not designed for that number. So what load bearing issues are you talking about if 10 people were on that deck,would it hold?And the first question was, aesthetically,how would you reduce it, so it does not look asymmetrical, or ugly. John Scarlato So,if we were going to shrink it, I'm thinking we're shrinking the depth of it. So, I'm probably going out halfway, maybe like eight making it like 8 feet deep or something. So,you can put chairs and look out. So, I'm thinking somewhere around like seven, eight feet, kind of like a front porch, I would bring the back railing in and then we have to work with like the roof pitch in front of it, I'm assuming to try to make it look Eke the railings just not in the wrong place. So,it was easier to put the railing around the edge, if we had to not put the railing around the edge,I would have to pull it in and probably put somewhat of a sloped roof in front of it a little bit So that it you know,I guess bring the roof pitch up and then stop it and then we'd have to put some kind of drainage through to get to get out, as opposed to having the drainage on the edge of it. That would be my thought I leave at the same length because I really kind of wanted the railing on the part of the deck to be the length of the columns. So,if we pulled it in,you'd see a little bit of roof running kind of in here. And then the railing would be a little shorter is what I'm thinking,and then on the side,you know,this railing would be gone.And you know,your railing would be kind of in here where your post might be kind of setback. Glenn Brettschneider Almost like a city balcony. Right. So,it seems you could do that. And again,I'm not for or against. I'm just saying you could make it smaller, as like a city balcony and still give them seating.But with the deck,the roof itself,it just seems that the way it's been designed seems to be the preferable design,aesthetically. John Scarlato Yeah,it's a clean,it's a clean look,water getting out of the roof is much easier. It's just it's just its Yes. It's a better Yeah,it's a better design for function. Joel Simon And I don't see a reason to reduce the size. I don't see that it solves any issues. Don Moscato I'm just, I'm just introducing the discussion for the record.You know,and in the event because John,as you know,is a resident expert on functionality of decks and porticos. And he has argued historically that certain widths are functionally useful. And anything below that,but the is it 12 feet or 14 feet wide. That's way beyond John's normal. His parameters for usability. What about the load bearing nature of this deck as proposed? If 10 people were on there,will it handle 10 people? - 26- Transcribed by https://otter.ai John Scarlato It would hold and hold the snow load. Yeah,as well. Structurally,it's well designed. Plus,I realize also the roof had to hold the snow load. So,the roof itself is decently designed. Joshua Shaw So, I have put on 20 pounds since COVID.Just for the record.Just letting you know for the record. Peter Gottlieb I think Glenn made a very,very good point. And seriously,we would really withdraw any objection to the size. I think the good compromise is any staircase. And you know,we're fine. We're fine with it,because whether it's going to be fine. I mean, this. Joshua Shaw Thank you,Peter. Glenn Brettschneider Yeah.Again,just you know,I'm not pushing one way or the other. Peter Gottlieb I know you made a very logical analysis of the deck that I didn t really see but I think you're right. Don Moscato Okay. Now,I would take then the Gottlieb's comments as later on when I say anyone want to speak in favor of the application,I will take your comments now to be registered in that in that genre later on.Any other questions for John at this point?Jamie,do you want to weigh in at all?Are you comfortable with everything? Jamie Schutzer Yeah,yeah,I think,you know,with the conditions. And I agree that that Glenn did make a good point. You know,if you cut back a couple of feet, a few feet,I mean, so instead of getting 10 people,you can get eight people. I mean,that you object to the project altogether, or you dont so, so it sounds like the Gottlieb's are happy that with the removing of the stairs, so,you know, I'm in favor of it Okay. Don Moscato Okay. Any other comments?Before we make a motion to? John Scarlato I'm going to make one other comment. Don Moscato Okay-. - 27- Transcribed by https://otter.ai John Scarlato My own house has a deck off the master bedroom. I lived in the house 16 years,we've used it. We've sat on that deck,I'm going to say once, maybe twice. Like you very rarely use a deck off your bedroom. Because you're going to get a New York Times and a cup of coffee.You're going off the one off the kitchen. Jamie Schutzer But John do you see the Long Island Sound from your deck? John Scarlato No,but I have a very nice view from my deck. But no. Glenn Brettschneider I just want to say I make a recommendation to Josh and Melissa. Because I watched a lot of these home shows. I've actually seen a lot of houses now have espresso makers in the bedroom and the bathroom. And I'm thinking at first it seemed kind of odd. But now that I think about it,it's actually a brilliant idea. Joshua Shaw Who wants to go downstairs to get the espresso when you could have it right here. Glenn Brettschneider That's what I'm saying. So maybe you would get more use out of it. Don Moscato Glenn you're giving John ideas for future projects. We're going to have espresso. Glenn Brettschneider I gotta be honest. John Scarlato The kitchen is a location for,don't want to change my philosophy of refrigerator drawers and refrigerators and everything else everything should be a one room. Glenn Brettschneider I'm just telling you an espresso maker in the bedroom is a great thing. Joshua Shaw I agree with Glenn. It doesn't take up much space. Glenn Brettschneider Yep. - 28- Transcribed by https://otter.ai Don Moscato To change the world. Glenn Brettschneider If you're going to be up for that sunrise, you want you don't want to go down to the kitchen. Joshua Shaw Right,who wants to shlep downstairs? Glenn Brettschneider Right. John Scarlato There you go. Don Moscato Okay. Anyone else want to speak in favor of the application?Anyone want to speak against the application? Can I have a motion to close the public hearing? Steve Berger So moved. Glenn Brettschneider Motion to close. Don Moscato Second. Okay,good public hearing is closed. Okay, I think we've looked at and asked a lot of relevant questions with respect to the application. So let me go through the five factors quickly. I don't think it will have an impact on the character of the neighborhood unless too many characters populate the deck. Secondly, the applicant,the benefit the applicant seeks cannot be achieved to another method feasible for the applicant that does not require the variance. Do you consider the variance substantial?What do you think? Glenn Brettschneider I actually I kind of think it is. Joel Simon I could probably lean that way too. - 29- Transcribed by https://otter.ai Glenn Brettschneider Yeah,I mean,I think. Don Moscato Okay. Glenn Brettschneider We thought the lower part was substantial See,going out the same amount of length,right? Don Moscato Okay, all right,very good. The variances will not create any adverse impact to the physical or environmental conditions of the neighborhood. And five, the need for the variance is self-created,are we comfortable with that. Okay,I'm going to read the modified resolution.And if I mentioned spiral staircase,it's not supposed to be there,and then at the appropriate time Drew will add her condition. - 30- Transcribed by https:Hotter.ai RESOLUTION WHEREAS, application has been made to the Zoning Board by Joshua Shaw&Melissa Shaw (the "Applicants") for a rear yard setback variance of 12 feet where the minimum required rear yard setback is 40 feet pursuant to Village Code � 250-20.G(3) in connection with the proposed construction of a new roof deck,on property located at 12 Birch Lane,in an R-15 zoning district on the South side of Birch Lane, approximately 290 feet from the intersection of Old Orchard Road and Birch Lane. Said premises being known and designated on the tax map of the Village of Rye Brook as Parcel ID#135.43-1-5.40;and WHEREAS, a duly advertised public hearing was held on May 4, 2021, at which time all those wishing to be heard were given such opportunity; and WHEREAS, the public hearing was closed on May 4,2021; and WHEREAS, the proposed action is a Type II action pursuant to the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act and accordingly, no further environmental review is required; and WHEREAS, the Board, from the application, after viewing the premises and neighborhood concerned, and upon considering each of the factors set forth in Village Code � 250-13(G)(b)[2][a]-[e] of the Rye Brook Code, finds: 1) The variance WILL NOT create an adverse impact to the character of the neighborhood; 2) The benefit the Applicants seek CANNOT be achieved through another method,feasible for the Applicants to pursue,that does not require the variance; 3) The variance IS substantial; 4) The variance WILL NOT create any adverse impacts to the physical or environmental conditions of the neighborhood;and - 31 - Transcribed by https://otter.ai 5) The need for the variance IS self-created. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the said application for a rear yard setback variance of 12 feet where the minimum required rear yard setback is 40 feet pursuant to Village Code § 250- 20.G(3) in connection with the proposed construction of a roof deck, on property located at 12 Birch Lane, is hereby GRANTED on the following conditions: 1) No permit or certificate of occupancy shall be issued until the Applicants have paid in full all application and consultant fees incurred by the Village in connection with the review of this application. Don Moscato And secondly, Drew, Drew Gamils 1) The roof deck shall remain open and unenclosed. 2) No staircase shall be constructed from the roof deck to the ground floor. Don Moscato Okay. Are we comfortable with that everyone? Joel Simon Yes. Don Moscato Okay,good. Okay,let's vote then, Steve? Steve Berger Yes. Don Moscato Glenn? Glenn Brettschneider Yes. Don Moscato Jamie? - 32- Transcribed by https:Hotter.ai Jamie Schutzer Yes. Don Moscato Joel? Joel Simon Yes. Don Moscato Don?Yes. Okay.Application approved five. yeses,no,nos. I'll just make a comment that I hope no real estate brokers and salespeople heard the comment that there is no land on Red Roof. Because they're trying to make the most attractive appearance of for every lot in Rye Brook. We wouldn't want somebody to see the zoning hearing and say oh, they have no land. Okay, congratulations and enjoy. Enjoy the new deck. Joshua Shaw Thank you.We just want to thank everyone.Thank you,John.And thank you The Gottlieb's as well thank you all for the help. Okay. Don Moscato Okay. Thank you. John Scarlato Thank you. Joshua Shaw Have a good night everybody. Glenn Brettschneider Take care. Joshua Shaw Take care. - 33- Transcribed by https:Hotter.ai 1.3. #21-013 (Application Withdrawn) Michael Medd& Theresa Medd 75 Winding Wood Road Legalize screened in porch constructed under Building Permit#765 dated 3/27/1961. Don Moscato Okay. The next application is 21-013 application and is withdrawn. 1.4. #20-012 David Morrisey&Carin Morrisey 21 Woodland Drive Request extension of approval of Zoning variance, Village Code § 250- 13.1-1. Don Moscato Okay. Then,last one is application number 20-012.David and Carin Morrissey 21 Woodland Drive requesting an extension of approval of a zoning variance village code. This is the first time in my history of the tenure that we've ever had an extension based on a broken leg. Mark Mustacato How are you. Don Moscato So, I hope you're feeling better? Mark Mustacato Oh,yeah. Thanks. So,Mark Mustacato, the architect for Mr. and Mrs. Morrissey. So again,we are requesting a six month extension. as I outlined in the letter,you know, the current variance was granted back in November of last year.And with COVID, and the holidays coming up and everything we collectively decided we would sort of reconvene in January,which we did, and get the package together and submit everything.And then unfortunately, I broke my leg on February 13,which has derailed a lot of things, including this project. So,we're back on track again and working on it. But we're,again requesting the extension based on that they were just unable to get everything together because of that. Don Moscato Okay, thank you. Joel Simon Doctors note? - 34- Transcribed by https://otter.ai Don Moscato Doctors note. Don Moscato Do we have a doctor's note for the record? Mark Mustacato I could send you the X rays if you want Don Moscato Actually,no you could just put your foot on the zoom camera and then that'll resolve the whole issue. Do we have any problem with this request for an extension from any members of the board? Steve Berger No. Jamie Schutzer No. Don Moscato Okay. All right.Let me go ahead and read the resolution. RESOLUTION WHEREAS, on November 4, 2020 the Village of Rye Brook Zoning Board of Appeals granted David Morrisey& Carin Morrisey (the "Applicants") (1) a contextual front yard setback variance of 16.5 feet where the minimum required contextual front yard setback is 67.3 feet pursuant to Village Code 5 250- 18.2.H,and(2) a front height setback ratio variance of 0.06 where the maximum allowable front height setback ratio is 0.48 pursuant to Village Code § 250-18.2 j(1),in connection with the proposed second floor addition, on property located at 21 Woodland Drive,in an R-25 zoning district on the North side of Woodland Drive, approximately 1,200 feet from the intersection of Beechwood Boulevard and Woodland Drive. Said premises being known and designated on the tax map of the Village of Rye Brook as Parcel ID# 135.36-1-36 (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, the variances will expire on May 4,2021 pursuant to Village Code � 250-13.H; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Board is in receipt of a letter from Mark Mustacato,ALA,, dated April 12, 2021 requesting an extension of the variances;and - 35- Transcribed by https://otter.ai WHEREAS, the Applicant requires an extension of the variances due to unforeseen delays; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Board has the authority pursuant to Village Code § 250-13.H to grant an extension of the original variance approval for an additional six (6) months if the applicant demonstrates that there is a good cause for an extension. NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED,that the Village of Rye Brook Zoning Board hereby grants a six(6) month extension of the variance referenced herein for property located at 21 Woodland Drive to expire on November 4,2021 unless a building permit is issued prior to November 4, 2021. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, except as specifically modified by the amendment contained herein,the Zoning Board of Appeals Resolution dated November 4,2020,and the conditions set forth therein, is otherwise to remain in full force and effect. Don Moscato Okay, are we comfortable with that? Ready for a vote? Glenn Brettschneider Yes. Don Moscato Okay, Steve? Steve Berger Yes. Don Moscato Glenn? Glenn Brettschneider Yes, Don Moscato Jamie? Jamie Schutzer Yes. Don Moscato - 36- Transcribed by https://otter.ai Don?Joel? Joel Simon Yes. Don Moscato Yes, Don?Yes. Okay.Application approved. Five yeses,zero nos. Okay. Thank you very much.And take care. No running marathons for a while. Mark Mustacato Yeah.That's for sure. Thank you. Don Moscato Okay. Okay. Stay away from runaway cars on Woodland Drive also.We had an incident here this week. Mark Mustacato All right,take care. Don Moscato Okay. The final item on our agenda is the approval of the March and April Zoning board summaries.Do I have a motion to approve both? Glenn Brettschneider So moved. Don Moscato Second? Jamie Schutzer Seconded. Don Moscato Seconded. Okay. Okay. Board summaries are approved.Thank you very much Drew. And that's a good sign off for today. Have a great rest of the week. And hopefully everything goes well for all of us. Take care everyone. Motion to adjourn? Joel Simon So moved. Don Moscato Okay, okay. The meeting is adjourned. Okay. Good night. Good night, everyone. - 37- Transcribed by https:Hotter.ai i JOHN G. SCARLATO JR. ARCHITECT 33 BYRAM HILL ROAD ARMONK, NY 10504 PHONE 914 273-7350 FAX 914 273-9222 April 29, 2021 Village of Rye Brook 938 King Street Rye Brook,NY 10573 i RE: 12 Birch Lane AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING NOTIFICATION & POSTING OF SIGN Dear Zoning Board of Appeals: This letter is stating that my office Mailed out the Notice of Public Hearing letter for 12 Birch Lane, according to the village's regulations. The mailing was mailed on April 16,2021. The sign was created in accordance with the regulations of the village of Rye Brook and put up on April 16,2021 and will stay up till after the meeting on May 4,2021. Sincerely, John G. Scarlato Jr. worn to before me this day C 6/-- ,2021 Notary Public p ECENE APR 2 3 2021 From: Mike Izzo<Mlzzo@ryebrook.org> VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK Sent: Friday,April 23, 20218:58 AM BUILDING DEPARTMENT To: Donald Moscato#2 <drm3532@gmail.com>; Drew Gamils<DGamils@kblaw.com>; Glenn Brettschneider<gbreet@aol.com>;James Schutzer<jdschutzer@gmail.com>;Joel Simon <esgsimon@aol.com>; Mike Izzo<Mlzzo@ryebrook.org>; Steve Berger<sberger@vedderprice.com>; Steven Fews<SteveFews@ryebrook.org>;Tara Gerardi<tgerardi@ryebrook.org>; David Heiser <d345788@aol.com> Cc:John Scarlato<jgscarlato@gmail.com>; mshawdd@gmail.com Subject: FW: Zoning Application#21-010,Josh and Melissa Shaw Please see the email below received by my office this morning. Thank you. lffk4ad(7, /uo Building& Fire Inspector Village of Rye Brook, NY (914) 939-0668 From: Peter Gottlieb<peter@eeoaeottlieb.com> Sent:Thursday,April 22, 20218:21 PM To: Mike Izzo<Mlzzo@ryebrook.ore> Subject:Zoning Application#21-010,Josh and Melissa Shaw Hi Michael, Not sure if you are the one to receive this but if not, I am giving it a shot that you can steer it to the correct person or area. We live directly behind the Shaw's at 15 Red Roof Drive. We received the attached as part of the Public Notice Process and met with the Shaw's this afternoon. Below is the e-mail sent to them after our meeting. In summary, as the e-mail to the Shaw's states, with our bedroom parallel to the requested deck, we are concerned mostly with noise. We are okay with the variance request provided that they limit the egress to the deck solely to and from the master bedroom, i.e., no egress from the ground by spiral staircase or other means, and that seating is limited to two(2) Adirondack chairs intended to prevent gathering of groups of people. We plan to attend the virtual meeting on May 4a'as well. If there is anything else you need from us, please advise. Thank you, Roberta& Peter Gottlieb Peter M. Gottlieb Certified Public Accountant (212) 697-5180 Fax(914) 690-0060 This written advice (including any attachments) was not intended or written to be used, and it cannot be used by any taxpayer, for(1)the purpose of avoiding any tax penalties that may be imposed on the taxpayer or(2)promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any tax- related matter(s) addressed herein. This statement is made pursuant to Circular 230 (U.S. Treasury Regulations governing tax practice.) The information contained in this communication may be confidential. It is intended only for the recipient named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication or its contents is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately advise the sender and delete the original and any copies from your computer system From: Roberta Gottlieb [mailto:eottliebroberta@smail.coml Sent:Thursday,April 22, 20216:49 PM To: Peter Gottlieb<Pete r@Reoagottlieb.com> Subject: Fwd: rear patio and exterior kitchen drawing 9-1-20.pdf Begin forwarded message: From: Roberta Gottlieb <gottliebroberta(a,gmail.com> Date: April 22, 2021 at 4:10:49 PM EDT To: Melissa Shaw<mshawddggmail.com> Cc: Peter<peterggeoagottlieb.com> Subject: Re: rear patio and exterior kitchen drawing 9-1-20.pdf Hi Melissa We are glad we finally got to meet you and Josh today. Thank you for explaining your plans to US. As we explained to you our concern is not visual but noise since our bedroom is parallel to where the deck would be located. In addition, your backyard is so close to ours that we already can hear your conversations and we're concerned that your voices would carry even more from being up higher on the deck. Based on our discussion, if you were to remove any egress to the deck other than from the master bedroom, and limit seating to Adirondack type chairs for you and Josh, and not as as a gathering area, it seems we would have no problem with your variance. We plan to attend the virtual zoning board meeting on May 4th. Hope things go well Regards, Roberta and Peter On Apr 20, 2021, at 10:44 AM, Melissa Shaw<mshawdd@gmail.com> wrote: Great see you then! Sent from my iPhone On Apr 20, 2021, at 8:37 AM, Roberta Gottlieb <gottliebroberta@gmail.com> wrote: Yes. Thursday at 1:30 is good for us Roberta On Apr 20, 2021, at 8:19 AM, Melissa Shaw<mshawdd@gmail.com> wrote: Hi Roberta Thank you so much for your email. Can we all meet here this Thursday 1:30pm? Let me know if this works? Sent from my iPhone On Apr 19, 2021, at 11:21 PM, Roberta Gottlieb<gottliebroberta@gmail.com>wrote: a Melissa, Thanks for your e-mail. You first came to us back in October and told us that you were putting in a permanent roof in order to provide shade over your existing patio, making sure that we had no objections. We did not. Now, rather than coming to us about changes to the project requiring a variance, we learn of it through the "public notice process', in which neighbors within 250 feet of your property are notified of a variance request in the event that they may object to the project. We have several concerns and questions about the project as how it will affect us and the value of our property in the future. We take you up on your offer to speak, and take it further to meet"live"with you on your property with the complete plans in hand and with your professionals, to better have them explain to us the project and where we can voice our concerns. We are available Thursday and Friday this week after 11. If these don't work we can go into next week. Roberta and Peter Gottlieb On Apr 19, 2021, at 9:10 PM, Melissa Shaw<mshawdd(&gmail.com> wrote: Hi Roberta and Peter! I hope you're well - and staying safe, sound and healthy! Yes, I planned to reach out to you and the other neighbors before the letters went out and just realized the architect sent them already. My apologies! The short answer is that we realized that one of the single best features of our house is that we can see the Long Island Sound from our top floor, and it would be a real mistake to not at least have a small sitting area on the roof of the patio if we want to watch the sunrise or just relax with the water view. The roof on the patio is already approved, and we simply asked if we can make a small section of the roof an area where we can sit. Not exactly sure why that involves variances, but I'm just a dentist, so I can't process to understand the variance rules. We did look at the tree line between all of our neighbors, and given this will be below the windows on our top floor, it won't have any impact on any of our neighbors from a privacy perspective. Again, I truly sorry for not contacting you before the letters went out from the architect, I had every intention to. Happy to speak live if you'd like. Please let me know times that work and we can connect. All my best, Melissa Sent from my iPhone On Apr 19, 2021, at 5:52 PM, Roberta Gottlieb <gottliebroberta&gmail.com> wrote: f Hi Melissa We received a letter today from the Zoning Board about a variance you want for a roof deck and spiral staircase? We are very confused. Is this in addition to the rear patio plans you submitted last fall? You very nicely called and emailed us with all the details of that project but now you are asking us to give you a 12 foot variance with no explanation? Please give us a call at your convenience Roberta and Peter Gottlieb On Oct 7, 2020, at 8:31 PM, Melissa Shaw<mshawdd(&pmail.com> wrote: Hi Roberta Nice speaking with you and your husband! See attached... I'll send you pictures of what it will really look like in color Melissa <rear patio and exterior kitchen drawing 9-1-20.pdf> Sent from my iPhone This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service. For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service. For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com Building Permit Check List&Zoning Analysis Address: 1 SBI- 3-9 Zone: ✓'1 S Use: zi Const.Type: 2'4� Other. Submittal Date: `T b> Z-J Revisions Submittal Dates: Applicant: -S 4 A Vj Nature of Work: 'm F.-..3 :]2:20 F PU G-n- ��..41L-^ -T7 1.��cL.) O c3'I'A 0o r2 1-t��Cr��.N � i�A►Tt� �x'A At.,eJ t.�..� iZ��,,-��V Pc.. �.l���i �,42�-� eviews:ZBA.$E P 1 0 2020 PB: BOT: Other. ( ( ) FEES:Filing:_ BP: OI C/O: Legalization: APP: Dated: Notarized: ✓SBL --truss I.D. Cross Connection: --' H.O.A.: ( ) ( ) Scenic Roads: Steep Slopes: Wetlands: Storm Water Review: Street Opening. ( ) ( ) ENVIRO:Long. Short: Fees: N/A: ( ) ( ) SITE PLAN:Topo: SiteProtection: S/W Mgmt.: Tree Plan: Other. ( ) (•SURVEY:Dated: 1 Z Current: Archival• ✓ Sealed Unacceptable: ( ) ( � PLANS:D7 Stamped ✓ eale `� Copies: ,2 Electronic: ✓ Other. (� ( ) License: Workers Comp: Liabih V" Comp.Waiver. Other. CODE 7S3#: n l o3 w Dated N/A: (Jf ( ) HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRICAL:Plans: Permit: N/A Other. ( ) ( ) LOW-VOLTAGE ELECTRICAL:Plans: Permit N/A Other. ( ) ( ) FIRE ALARM/SMOKE DETECTORS:Plans: Permit: H.W.I.C.:_Battery:_Other. (� ( ) PLUMBING:Plans: Permit: Nat.Gas: LP Gas: N/A/: Other. ( ) ( ) FIRE SUPPRESSION:Plans: Perot: N/A: Other. ( ) ( ) H.V.A.C.: Plans: Permit: N/A Other. ( ) ( ) FUEL TANK:Plans: Permit: Fuel Type: Other. ( ) ( ) 2017 NY State ECCC: N/A: Other P/ ( Final Survey: Final T RA/PE Sign-off Letter. As-Built Plans: Other. (.� (✓ BP DENIAL LETTER: Z C/O DENIAL LETTER: Other. Other. ( mtg.date approval:- 1 notes: (�mtg.date: tl approval: 2 notes: ( )PB mtg.date: approval: notes: REQUIRED EXLSTING PROPOSED NOTES 1 V 2 4 1020 Art l S ill (l f S� - O�G Dates CL= Fr n Front:_ 94 o Front. - Sides: S A O R do tio•s3 2 G ZSo - 2Q.t.0 Ll 4a- Main Cov Accs.Cov Ft.H Sb: S .H Sb: Tot.Imp: qq S l o l t (DF Zr' plc.. No V kLA A+J srx, _ 'Zrr-Z> . For1, -iZe.-t-jec,-JN Fc.�Imv: Puking. Hcght/Stories: notes: L �J BUILD MENT D VILOOK SEP — 3 2020 938 KING -ETst i Bn` ,NY 10573 (914)9 :` 9' 39-5801 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK W r2 BUILDING DEPARTMENT I ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD CHECK LIST FOR APPLICANTS This form must be completed and signed by the applicant of record and a copy shall be submitted to the Building Department prior to attending the ARB meeting. Applicants failing to submit a copy of this check list will be removed from the ARB agenda. Z `3 i�c,1-� �. Job Address: r� Date of Submission: Parcel ID#: 13S, 43— 1— 5,lb Zone: R-1 S i Proposed Improvement(Describe in detail): APPLICANT CHECK LIST: 1 t ew RPY �^g, ' off, ���b 4 4 MUST BE COMPLETED BY THE APPLICANT ��M U`'C"' The following items must b submitted to the Building t`—tPr QIQYyw�e. (,A'2.115 o Department by the applicant-no exceptions. 1. ( )Completed Application 2. ( )Two(2)sets of sealed plans. (one IJII size(maxunum Property Owner:070,. �O. 5& rV-i i i SCoa (A(A( allowable plan size=36"x 42")land one I I"xl7") Address: _�Z. �j S trc�1-� �gh _ 3. ( )Two(2)copies of the property survey. l 4. ( )Two(2)copies of the proposed site plan. Phone# 1-7,! C/Z Z— I Z 3 ) S. ( )One electronic/disc copy of the complete Applicant appearing before the Board: materials.d: 6. ( )Filing Fee. "Td \n G Su&r1cv� , 3L 7. ( )Any supporting docurimentation. Address:3 3 '&4 r, hVI R,0� �J 1ftei1C1 A� 8• ( )HOA approval letter.'(fapplicable) --� 9. ( )Photographs. Phone# (q��� Z��— 73.5� 10.( )Samples of finishes/color chart.(a sa►uple boad or model►nay be presented the night of the n►eetl►►g) Architect/Engineer: o rhQ As AStJ Phone# By signature below, the owner/applicant acknowledges that he/she has read the!complete Building Permit Instructions&Procedures,and that their application is complete in all respects.The Board of Review reserves the right to refuse to hear any application not meeting the requirements contained herein. Sworn to before me this tp, Sworn to before me this day of {', 20&,o day of N` , 204-D S gnntur/o�roperty/Owner ignaturc of Applicant Print Name of Property Owner Print Name of Applicant i Notary Public SHARI MELILLO Notary Public Notary Public, State of New York No.01 ME6160063 III SHARI MELILLO Qualified in Westchester County Notary Public,State 9f New York o.01 ME6160063 Qualifi d in Westche ter Coun Commissi Exoiros Janban►29.2�gL I VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK BUILDING DEPARTMENT 938 KING STREET, RYE BROOK,NY 10573 (T) 939-0668 (F) 939-5801 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD Wednesday, May 19, 2021 NAME&LOCATION TYPE OF APPLICATION MOTION SECOND APPROVED REJECTED APPL.# 12 Ridge Blvd Roof Top Solar Array Consent 5193 (Mattinson) Agenda 41 Country Ridge 6Ft Black Chain Link Consent 5195 Dr(Taxier& Fence& 6Ft White PVC Agenda Diamond) Fencing 8 Fairlawn Pkwy Expand Asphalt Driveway Consent 5196 Agenda 24 Berkley Dr 6Ft White PVC Fence In Consent 5196 (Gisondi) Rear Agenda 21 Ridge Blvd New Hot Tub On Platform Consent 5197 (Murguia) In Rear Agenda 29 Lincoln Ave New Swim Spa On Consent 5198 (Burathoki) Extended Patio, Relocate Agenda Side Fence 547 Westchester Remove Front Walk, Consent 5199 Ave(Marshall) Expand Driveway&New Agenda Front Landing 59 High Point Circle Replace Existing Deck w/ 5200 (Mangino) New Deck 3 High Point Circle Enlarge Existing Rear 5201 (Cao) Deck 12 Birch Lane Amendment To Prior n 5202 (Shaw) Approval (�n 1 Westridge Dr 1 Story Side Addition, Fire 03 (Tauber) Pit In Rear Yard& Legalize Rear Patio Expansion ML NM MR SE JM SF AC MI KC y Road(Valad) Approval, (Front Door Agenda Change) 35 Bonwit Road Replace Driveway R.R. Tie Consent 5107 (Sedrish) Walls w/Mesa Block Agenda 72 Valley Terrace Re- Appearance 2nd Story 5097 (72 Valley Terrace Addition &Alterations LLC) 11 Winding Wood Legalize Rear Elevated 5108 Road(Kotlin) Deck 6 Winding Wood Window Changes& Sky 5109 Road Lights/To Accommodate (Escobar/Otero) Kitchen Renovation 7 Beechwood Blvd Application to Amend Prior 5023 (Schoeman) Approval 39 Country Ridge Dr Inground Swimming Pool, 5110 (Austrian) Patio, Cabana, Fencing, & Deck Alterations 12 Birch Lane Roof Over Rear Patio 5111 (Shaw) Extension, Outdoor Kitchen & Remove Gazebo 116 Country Ridge Rear Addition, Inground 5112 Drive(Jacobs) Swimming Pool, Deck, & Outdoor Kitchen 3 Charles Lane Rear Deck, Roof Covered 5113 (Abraham) Extended Patio, Fire Pit, BBQ & Sitting Wall 21 Woodland Drive 2nd F1 Addition, & 1 Story 5114 (Morrisey) Addition S. C. Rye Brook Construct Playground Area 5115 Partners S.E. Corner ML ✓ NM MR ✓ SE JM SF AC MI KC VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK BUILDING DEPARTMENT 938 KING STREET, RYE BROOK, NY 10573 (T) 939-0668 (F) 939-5801 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD Wednesday, November 18, 2020 Due to public health and safety concerns from COVID-19, the Architectural Review Board meeting on November 18, 2020 will be closed to members of the public. The public can still watch the live meeting online through Zoom through the app or through the following https://us02web.zoom.us/i/82249823211 If any interested members of the public would like to provide comments during the meeting, comments can be emailed to stevefews@ryebrook.org or called in during the meeting at +1 (929) 205-6099, meeting ID: 822 4982 3211 NAME & LOCATION TYPE OF APPLICATION MOTION SECOND APPROVED REJECTED APPL.# 16 Maywood Ave Replace Rear Yard Wood Consent 5091 (Robles) Fence w/ 6Ft Agenda 19 Maywood Ave Driveway Widen, Retaining Consent 5100 (Ocasio) and Wall Fence Agenda 16 Hillandale Road New 4'-0" High Post and Consent 5101 (Harmon) Rail Fence w/Wire Mesh Agenda 717 Westchester Ave New 4' High Open Picket, Consent 5102 (Shehata) Front Yard and 6'High Agenda White Vinyl Fence Rear Yard. 6 Legendary Circle Post & Rail Fence In Rear Consent 5103 (Goodman) Yard Agenda 476 N. Ridge Street Roof Top Solar Array Consent 5104 (Sidelev) Agenda 47 Mohegan lane 6Ft High White Privacy Consent 5105 (Shapira) Fence, @ Rear Lot Line Agenda 23 Lincoln Ave Re- Do & expand Rear Patio Consent 5106 (Morales) Agenda 165 Betsy Brown Amendment to Prior Consent 5063 ML NM MR SE JM SF AC MI KC VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK BUILDING DEPARTMENT 938 KING STREET, RYE BROOK,NY 10573 (T)939-0668 (F) 939-5801 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD Wednesday, January 19, 2022 ANNOUNCEMENT: PER THE GOVERNOR'S EXECUTIVE ORDER THIS MEETING WILL BE HELD VIRTUALLY THROUGH THE ZOOM PLATFORM. THE PUBLIC CAN ACCESS THE MEETING THROUGH THE FOLLOWING LINK: https://us02web.zoom.us/i/81417970741 OR BY OPENING ZOOM AND ENTERING THE MEETING ID: 81417970741 NAME&LOCATION TYPE OF APPLICATION MOTION SECOND APPROVED REJECTED APPI-4 1 Whippoorwill Rd 5 Ft High Black Aluminum Consent 5663 (Davis) Fence w/Arched Gate- Agenda Rear Yard. 19 Talcott Road Add Skylight to Roof Line Consent 5664 (Gamboa) in Conjunction With Agenda Bathroom Renovation 70 Rock Ridge Dr Roof Top Solar Array Consent 5665 j (Malik) Agenda 55 South Ridge St Roof Top Solar Array Consent 5666 (Rodriguez) Agenda j 51 Hawthorne Ave Add Driveway Consent 5667 (Miller) (Exterior/Interior Agenda Alterations) 545 Westchester Refurbish Exterior Steps, 5659 Ave (Castiglia) Railing,New Aluminum Awning, & Retaining Wall 12 Birch Lane Revision To Prior Approval 5668 (Outdoor Kitchen) 85 Valley Terrace New Egress Window, and 5669 (Krebs) Window Close Up to Facilitate Basement Renovations _- 57 Hillandale Road Amendment To Prior 5670 (Grossberg) Approval ML NM MR SE JM SF AC MI KC 275 S. Ridge Street Legalize Store Front 5671 , (Washington Park Changes Plaza) 10 Arlington Rd New Single Family 5612 (Gizzo) Dwelling w/Attached 2 Car _ Garage _ 47 Hawthorne Ave New 1 Family Dwelling 5673 (Miller) ML NM MR SE JM SF AC M KC j Shaw Project: 12 Birch lane Rye Brook NY 10573 R JAN - 6 2021 General Contractor name: Sergio Flores VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK BUILDING DEPARTMENT General Contractor Contact info: 203-814-6632 Dig Safe NY ticket number: 01061-000-638 Estimated Cost of Construction: $40,000 Tara Gerardi From: Tara Gerardi Sent: Monday, November 30, 2020 3:35 PM To: mshawdd@gmail.com' Cc: John G. Scarlato,Jr. Subject: Building Permit 12 Birch Lane The building permit application has been approved by the Building Inspector, before I can issue the building permit the following items must be submitted to our office, 1. General contractor's contact name & phone number z 2. Copy of general contractor's valid Westchester County Home Improvement License.✓ 3. General contractor's valid liability insurance (the Village Of Rye Brook must be the certificate holder) v/ 4. General contractor's valid workers compensation on a NY State Board form (C105-2 or U26.3)✓ 5. Contractor must call Dig Safe NY and get a ticket number.✓ 6. Estimated cost of construction to determine the building permit fee ($15.00 per $1,000.00)L/ Tara A G erardt Secretary - Planning Board, Zoning Board of A peaCs & Arch itec turaC Review Board Village of Rye Brook 938 acing Street Rye Brook, New York 10573 Office (914) 939-0668 Fax (914) 939-5801 AW �Wl2iVd3U ONiaiins `r • AOO'8s 3M -40 30dIIin �G f I � \._ �^ :? �5: A ni \ O ��•� Ir v�'+IIII,//IIII/ y\ ' ,y<�(�4�Z\ N fl t �fi',"ti��,1+4��i1j v '..� tl �/It}ic n� �� �1/ I/�j�/l 1�11111111 t;i... 1 � ��.�c• ',��� .� I 1 ����Fft�' 1�I/I/IIIj1• o s..11j11,11/111: �,�yp:.11� __ •� � • ly.ate" ��1 + nt � L. �.rvy'•� r C U =l o O ¢ N ag molf r _ o L o (1] N R o V O ^� o v � l<(0)1► ch q -- man • 'q T rA Of CO C O s" Q Lo a_ o o otiection w o r U c' }� ? E a.• f� v, Q x — w m z � G] o a, i .x�,�• z Z 3 w c� CO) �. . w O O w O O : rn I �1.1 3 0 ' �w�• U E !�O 00 'C<(0)),T1�: C a�'i ,� �•. ram- i `'\:...c�': 1 • PAW,i1• .7 c .0 CN .r n - __ 4. <�s.r)%+y-�� q=111�111"F-:_ ewe lll� 11 xt '� �T _�11 �111':y-=� ''-. 11 111 �11 1�h ►:�`F/1 11 sr;• . . . . . . . . . " .: � IN WOW �. ���� I IIII/I/.11 � t 111///1,11 � .`111�1/11111 -11�111�111� s ly,(III�1,9 1�1'��/�1�1-• [ 3a F'11111'111�:%%.% rp t(t�) Q - 9 � r •♦ A _ f ♦• A •♦ �^ ♦♦ A - N :�,.. t �� i r�..:���'��ty, ((,•I•/III t'� CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE `"` .IneNwrYYa 1 ii4 2021 THIS CERTIFICATE 1S ISSUED AS A MATTER OF OEORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO R*NTS U P40N THE CERTIFICATE MOLDER THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSLOW-MS),AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PROOLICER AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER _ IMPORTANT: N the N:ertl/icate folder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED.the pohcy(ws)must haw ADDITIONAL INSURED provismins or be erldorfed If SUBROGATION IS WANED.sutilect to the temp and conditions of the policy,ewbm polices may require an endorxrtmtlt. A sUhmnetl on this certftcme does not oonfw rights to the cerohcate holder in lieu of such armicirsermermlieb. e OOL-CIw 7 M� Daniel D Vnm,iir-• FITZPATRICK INSL.RANCE-ENT E k 91473961'7 Nc Rp1 9/47391553 vm.ft am54ACLCHERAVENUE Rw: danle1fA4Upatnchns/rance.ccm PEEKSKILL.NY ID566 IRwlenealANYO ICIM VOYtRACt NACa N9JRCR A: Falls_ake General lnilranr C Impany HiL'1 ;%%L.QD nomsGeneral Repair Inc N7JRLRa: P.O.BOIL 19C'2 NWREN C: Dishing,NY 10562 NAiRCR O: "IFURCR t:.- NeNIR11 a: COVERAGE3 CE T*1CATE MMIER_ REVISION NUMBER. THNS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO TIE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE PCLIC PEZ47C INDICATED. NOTWIIHSTANDNG ANY REQUIREMENT TERM OR CONDITION OF ANC CONTRACT OR OTTER DOCUMENT'mrH RESPECT TO VVHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR WAY PERTANs THE NSJRANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICES DESCREIED HEREIN IS SJBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS EXCLLSIONS AND CONDITIONS S OF 51.1101 POLICIES LIMITS SHCrh%MAC HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PA,D CLAMS TYK 0►eMNYCt am■� aC ICT tr► POLICYuNLTH Lewis A CC"aRctALGoom LLaaam" y SKP2011357 1006,2020 1C;CO2021 rx„Dcwatvct s 1.D00.000 c w �art tnwes-si oocuil I�wsLt.�iacu�n ,, s 100.000 N,tD I:W M—I..' , s 5.000 rtrauw&Ai.NURv s 1'000.001[ Q*t AaCaoArt LAW Ames MR uYRAI Ata:ilt:/iTt s 2.000.000 N•evCY FWD Lac IweLcrs-C(le•ts•A" I 2.000.00C WHIM s AlfraOSL YMOLnv coalaslnc uw s Aer IUTC 6 OVA= scrtuLm -- AIrOeCMV tyros moor elRaa lw..mrm s "veo ro`viRtito rWCPM"DkWAKZ s ALP 05O%Lr AITOsaf4� rwaeo m s II MLLA Lk" Dac.0" CAa ocart"Im t s ctCEss LJAI �twe6-AMIa: Aearill s ---------- woonams[oeRlefAnpu MR orn Aq CWLDVOW LAAEL" Y i M -STATLit - lyl .AY isassINTI-M C:m.T C4 RACR ACXX) MT s TI Aw%gvi Ir w-jm3 NiA iu..+r.r.Via It.CISAM-to tseto•nts: S I... -...9w.!b• It.USA6t R:UCYLMT s OM110"I OM Or CftMLATIC.O'L OCATMM'V=WLM tACMD\K AYw.r w.R.itR S.h d.s.my M ri,<A.a r..n ro.•u..RYn r, L y:t•e eerLficale hC�deT asaddihoral insured.Job location 12 Bich Lane Rye BmrALNY 10573 CERnFiCATE HOLDER CANCELLATION SHOULD AMr OF THE ABCNE DESCRIBED POLICES BE CAACELiED BEFORE THE EXPRATXM DATE THEREOF NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED N VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK BULGING DEPARTMENT ACCORDANCE WfTN THE POLICY PF1D1llKOB, 983 KING STREET ALT rcwao Ntnlcsw.Arnrc RYE BROOK.NY 10573 - 1988•2015 ACORD CORPORA TXWMIMM 9141� reserved ACORD 251201fi•0031 The ACORD name and bgo are registered narks of ACORD r � ��� i J� AN - 6 2021 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK BUILDING DEPARTMENT NYSIF New York State inswance Fund WESTCHESTER ONE 44 SOJTtI BROADVsAY.1CTH FLOOR,WHITE PLM14S ra- Ico 1 4411 1 nysii.com CERTIFICATE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION INSURANCE 0i- V7 O 262545639 FITZPATRICK INSURANCE CENTER 54 WELCHER AVE PEEKSKILL NY 105M SCAN 70 VALIDA'E AND SUBSCRIBE POLICYHOLDER CERTIFICATE HOLDER FLORES GENERAL REPAIR INC VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK PO BOX 1902 BUILDING DEPARTMENT OSSINING NY 10562 983 KING STREET RYE BROOK NY 10573 POLICY NUMBER I CERTIFICATE NUMBER POLICY PERIOD DATE W2296223-1 953596 08124�2020 TO 082412021 11412021 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICYHOLDER NAMED ABOVE IS INSURED WITH THE NEW YORK STATE INSURANCE FUND UNDER POLICY NO. 2296223-7, COVERING THE ENTIRE OBLIGATION OF THIS POLICYHOLDER FOR WORKERS' COMPENSATION UNDER THE NEW YORK WORKERS' COMPENSATION LAW WITH RESPECT TO ALL OPERATIONS IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK. EXCEPT AS INDICATED BELOW, AND. WITH RESPECT TO OPERATIONS OUTSIDE OF NEW YORK TO THE POLICYHOLDER'S REGULAR NEW YORK STATE EMPLOYEES ONLY IF YOU WISH TO RECEIVE NOTIFICATIONS REGARDING SAID POLICY.INCLUDING ANY NOTIFICATION OF CANCELLATIONS. OR TO VALIDATE THIS CERTIFICATE,VISIT OUR WEBSITE AT HTTPS:;,WWW NYSIF.COM,CERT!CERTVAL.ASP.THE NEW YORK STATE INSURANCE FUND IS NOT LIABLE IN THE EVENT OF FAILURE TO GIVE SUCH NOTIFICATIONS. THIS POLICY DOES NOT COVER CLAIMS OR SUITS TmAT ARISE FROM BODILY INJURY SUFFERED BY THE OFFICERS OF THE INSURED CORPORATION PRIES SERGIO FLORES FLORES GENERAL REPAIR INC THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFOMMTION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS NOR INSURANCE COVERAGE UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICY NEW YORK STATE INSURANCE FUND DIREC70R.14SURANCE FJND UNDMVR171NG VALIDATION NUMBER.923482440 D ;1 C, n U 261 � �, I DD JAN - 6 2021 E I E VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK BUILDING DEPARTMENT Tara Gerardi From: Mike Izzo Sent: Wednesday, January 6, 2021 2:13 PM To: Tara Gerardi; Laura Petersen Subject: FW: Message from Dig Safely New York, Inc. (DSNY) Michael J. Izzo Building & Fire Inspector Village of Rye Brook, NY (914) 939-0668 -----Original Message----- From: Dig Safely New York Exactix<tickets@exactix.digsafelynewyork.com> Sent: Wednesday, January 6, 2021 10:29 AM To: Mike Izzo<MIzzo@ryebrook.org> Subject: Message from Dig Safely New York, Inc. (DSNY) ****REGULAR**** DIG REQUEST from DSNY for: VIL RYE BROOK Taken: 01/06/2021 10:27 To: VIL RYE BROOK PRIMARY Transmitted: 01/06/2021 10:29 00001 Ticket: 01061-000-638-00 Type: Regular Previous Ticket: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ State: NY County: WESTCHESTER Place: RYE BROOK Addr: From: 12 To: Name: BIRCH LN Cross: From: To: Name: Offset ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Locate: REAR OF PROPERTY NearSt: OLD ORCHARD RD Means of Excavation: POST HOLE DIGGER Blasting: N Site marked with white:Y Boring/Directional Drilling: N Within 25ft of Edge of Road:Y Work Type: PAGOLA INSTALL Estimated Work Complete Date: 02/28/2021 Depth of excavation: 42 INCHES Site dimensions: Length 14 FEET Width 26 FEET Start Date and Time: 01/11/2021 07:00 Must Start By: 01/26/2021 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Contact Name: SERGIO FLORES Company: Addrl: 12 BIRCH LN Addr2: City: RYE BROOK State: NY Zip: 10573 Phone: 230-814-6632 Fax: Email: floresgenaral76@yahoo.com Field Contact: SERGIO FLORES Alt Phone: 230-814-6632 Working for: CALLER IS PERFORMING THE WORK THEMSELVES 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Comments: Lookup Type: PARCEL ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Members:ALTICE USA BELL-VALHALLA/WSCHSTR CONED SUEZ WTR WESTCHESTER VIL RYE BROOK WESTCHESTER CTY SWR 2 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK—TOWN OF RYE TITLE , SA--104004 No Disturbance Zone �� Tax Tax Lot , Lot —`� SECTION 135.43 R s-�..��! 80 44 40 W \�30 ; r .p < < Lot st°o ' 2.4 I s-aar , 1 15.3D1 144.70 5 �, 3 . , BLOCK 1 to AtuinInum Fence Z R +v of Adft inrbor �rlrtae � s-o.�• �' L----� LOT 5.4Q r t UM re"s E-a4 Alrinum one All m rlone* K oa� aipidaa T 11 ' �� N-o.!s-�. 25.00 t j CUFb fi 21.E 1.80' ".� x o to 42.22of 5-3'40.57 a m x o a Mao$ CassbQ p , �� uW P o o x SEP - - 0 32020 Tax o ,d M06 POW E VjL I L I -a �.A.�o' .fig.a ' "` 8 G F R Lot , Math UI p�NG Y�BRO EPA oK P 22 9 � A R TMEN L .29 I T ___J • :S!Ons Curb _ cnlnn. F e v a �--- r Lot 2 Story I ram' -� Lot 29 / Fra m e � 9 � 3 a 0 cHowe#S2� 139 I Garage O m m _J N LO 0 22.310 04r Platform 3.W = Tax C stm UW41Owl) C � rLot •� Flagstone Walk : 15.391 ov Stone aiirltli > —`--- Ta. v sm N _2�, Transf a'-- 4 .75 lot i L o t�'. 41.73' U w -- Q 0 ,�J �—• tv .p C to o O. S3r • o y fi o� Z SURVEY OF LOT 40 AS SHOWN ON A MAP ENTITLED "SUBDIVISION 83/ S 80*44 40 E 120.09 PLAT RED ROOF FARM," DATED SEPTEMBER 14. 1998 & FILED • 3��+e Apron MO 6ER 25, 1998 AS COUNTY CLERK MAP No. 26266. Eli rcl� La n e � CERTIFIED TO: C. BRADLEY MENDELSON, ; ( 5 0 F t R 0 W . o JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, NA, SURVEYED AS PO SSESSION OSSESStON v STEWART TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, �y x1 2002 STATEWIDE ABSTRACT CORP. THE MUNSON COMPANY Bough? to Dote vy jo, 200.E 9 NORTH G O O D IN I N AVE. v r� L/dense ,5p05�? Brought to Date phi/y 7, 2�0.5 " 91,cwh t to Dote &� certifcolion odr�ed&ar 17.. 2008 E LM S FO R D, N.Y. Unauthorized olterations or additions to a survey map is a violation of section 7209, sub-division 2, of the New York State Education Law." �D�23 "Only copies of the original survey marked with the land surveyor's UNDERGROUND PIPES, WIRES, STRUCTURES, Scale � �r=2G� ETC.. IF ANY ARE NOT SHOWN Inked or embossed seal shall be considered a true and valid copy." - J-13363 FOL—2C Wd9L6LPZL16l111-83E)Vd3ad uinH IF General notes: I, All WORK SHALL CONFORM 10 THE 2020 NEW YORK STATE BUILDING CODE,RESIDENTIAL CODE.' CONTENT..EXCAVATION MUST BE FREE OF WATER WHILE FOUNDATION WORK IS IN PROGRESS FIRE CODE,E14ERGY 9ONSERVATiON CONSTRUCTION CODE,EXISTING BUILDING CODE, TRUCKS,BULLD02ERS OR OTHER HEAVY EQUIPMENT SHALL BE OPERATED WITH CAUTION AND I MECHANICAL CODE,FUEL GAS CODE,AND PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE, IN SUCH A MANNER AS TO CAUSE NO DAMAGE TO FOUNDATION SYSTEMS. i 2.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT 8,BRACE ALL WORK FROM DAMAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION, 9.ALL STRUCTURAL STEEL SHALL BE NEW,CLEAN AND STRAIGHT AND SHALL CONFORM TO THE ' 3,ALL WORK TO BE PLUMB&TRUE,All PLUMBING WORK 10 BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH NYS LATEST EDITION FOR A.S.T.M.DESIGNATION A-36 OR A•500 FOR ALL"TS"SECTIONS.ALL PLUMBING CODE,ALL ELECTRICAL WORK TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH N,F,C„ALL HVAC STRUCTURAL STEEL WORKNSTR CT ON OFCOVPLY WITH SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE DESIGN, WORK TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH ASHRAE STANDARDS,LATEST EDITION,ALL CONTRACTORS AND FABRICATION AND CONSTRUCTION RIEST E I TURAL STEEL FOR BUILDING OF THE R PLATES 'INSTITUTE OF STEEL CONSTRUCTION L:11+�EST EDTTION.PROVlDE STIFFENER ANGLES OR PLATES ; SU8•CONTRACTORS SHALL BE LICENSED AND INSURED,ALL PLUMBERS AND ELECTRICIANS ARC UNDER ALL POSTS,COLUMNS OR Sl'RU(5 THAT ARE CARRIED BY STEEL BEAMS AND IN THE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY ADDITIONAL PERMITS,APPROVALS AND INSPECTIONS THEIR PARTICULAR WEB OF BEAMS CANTILEVERED OVERtOQLVMNS OR BEAMS SUPPORTING HANGERS.UNLESS TRADE MAC'REQUIRE OTHERWISE SHOWN OR SPECIF ED PROVIDE¢x8xs'1 BEARING ON CONCRETE MASONRY IF ANY. 4.LUMBER MATERIALS USED IN THE BUILDING SHALL BE GOOD,SOUND,DRY FREE FROM ROT,• .•, 10,HEADERS TO BE 13)7'X IW IN 2x6 WALLS OR 1j21 2'X I U'ly 2X4 WALLS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, , LARGE ANQ LOSE KNOTS,SHAKES AND OTHER IMPERFECTIONS WHEREBY THE STRENGTH MAY BE IMPAIRED,ALL NEW LUMBER SHALL CONFORM TO 2020 NEW YORK STATE BUILDING CODE� 11.INSULATION IN FLOORS,WALLS AND CEILINGS TO BE A COMBINATION OF FIBERGLASS BAT,CHAPTER 23.:PASTENING SHALL CONFORM TO 2020 NYSBC TABLE 2304.10.1 CONTINUOUS RIGID,OR SPRAY FOAM OR CELULOUS INSULATION TYPES TO CONFORM TO : ALL LUMBERSHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE AMERICAN WOOD COUNCLS �{, �{�LLI S j NATIONAL D IGN SPECIFICATIONS FOR 8ENDING STRESS AND DEFLECTION,AND 2D20 NYSBC 23D6,, WEST CH ENERGY CONSERVATION CONSTRUCTION CODE CHAPTER 4, fit�Ii i�l�y�-I� ►1 ALL WORKMANSHIP INCLUDING BLOCKING,.MILLING,BR.DGING,ECT.SHALL CONFORM TO THE 202E WESiESTER COUNTY IS CLIMATE ZONE 4Ar s NYSBC AND OR 2020 NYSRBC.PROVIDE LEDGER.BLOCKING.NAILERS AND ROUGH FRAMING 12.ALL FOOTINGS TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3'-6"BELOW GRADE,OR LOCAL FROST DEPTHAS SPECIFIEDBY HARDWARE AS-REQUIRED.ALL BEAMS,JOISTS AND RAFTERS TO BE SET WITH NATURAL CROWN UP. THE ARCHITECT,UNDERPIN WHEN NECESSARY. PROVIDE DOUBLE RAFTERS AND HEADERS AROUND ALL ROOF SKYLIGHTS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ALL LUMBER SHAM BEAR VISIBLE GRADE STAMP,ALL STRUCTURAL LUMBER INCLUDING BUT NOT 13.HOUSE TO CONFORM TO ANY LOCAL SUPPLEMENTAL CODE, ' �CJCIS'I-ICI LIMITED TO T11,TG;&LVL BEAMS OR EQUIVALENT SHALL BE INSTALLED PER DRAWINGS AND MANUFACTURERS-SPECIFICATIONS.ALL HANDLING AND INSTALLATION PROCEDURES MUST BE 14.PROVIDE BLOCKING AS REQUIRED TO BEARING POSTS ONTO GIRDER OR BEAM CONDITIONS G CIPTLI G IT,t4/1061P L�� ('i I!�I,l,�' _ _ C�S SUPPLIED BY THE MANUFACTURER AND SHALL BE FOLLOWED.TJI JOISTS AND LVL BERMS SHALL AND VERIFY ALL BEAR NG TO FOOTING:. NOT BE ALLOWED TO GET WET AT ANY TIME, 15.TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE,BELIEF AND PROFESSIONAL JUDGEMENT THESE PLANS AND K 6.'WITH USE OF ANY TRUSS TYPE,PRE-ENGINEERED OR TIMBER CONSTRUCTION A SIGN WI.L BE SPECIFICATIONS ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH 2O20 N,Y S,ENERGY CONSERVATION CONSTRUCTION COI. PLACED AT OR ADJACENT TO THE ELECTRIC METER WITH SPECIFICATIONS PROVIDED BY THE T 1 ARCH TECT, 16.ALL DECK RAILS AND STAIR HANDRAILS SHALL CONFORM TO THE 2020 N.Y.S.BUILDING CODE \ rrjj SECTIONS 1014 HANDRAILS AND 1014 GUARDS. 17�LC(�(�(`(2 r'f•a1-I n70���U� 6,ALL CONCRETE WORK,DETAILS AND CONSTRUCTION METHODS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE 1 WITH THE PROVISIONS OF ACI 318 AND ACT 332 OR PCA 100,AND THE 2020 NEW YORK STATE 17.ALL ROOF FRAMING SYSTEMS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH HIGH WIND CONNECTORS(HURRICANE I RESIDENTIAL CODE CHAPTER 8.ALL CONCRETE SHALL BE TYPE-1,300E PSI COMPRESSIVE TIESI IN COMPLIANCE WITH 2O20 N.Y.S.BUILDING CODE �2 r� AND SECURELY TIED IN PLACE SO AS TO PREVENT DISPLACEMENT DURING CONCRETING. 18.ALL POSTS TO FOUNDATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF SUPPORTING THE ROOF OR OTHER STRUCTURAL STRENGTH AT?.8 DAYS.REINFORCING BARS TO CONFORM TO 202E NYS BUILDING ELEMENTS SHALL BLOCKING AS SPECIFIED BY THE ARCHITECT OR A NOMINAL DIMENSION OF 4X4 CODE SECTION 1905 MODIFICATIONS TO ACI 318. FROM STRUCTURAL ELEMENT TO BE SUPPORTED CONTINUOUSLY TO A SOLID MASONRY Lr.Luf'�1� ''� REINFORCING SHALL BE ACCURATELY INSTALLED TO REQUIRED ELEVATION FOUNDATION THAT EXTENDS BELOW REQUIRED FROST DEPTH AND RESTS ON A FOOTING OF o���G;TGH Tq��r3Ba }Sfl 7.CONTRACTORS TO VERIFY ALL CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS PRIOR TO STARTING WORK. TYP;CAL CONSTRUCTION. ` ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE TO BE REPORTED TO ARCHITECT.ALL WRITTEN D'MENSIONS ON r%C I 1 f�'+'r �kw t THE DRAWINGS SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER ANY SCALED DIMENSIONS. 19.ALL SIMPSON STRONG TIE CONNECTORS AND ANCHORS ARE DESIGNED WITH SPECIFIC LOADS AND _ B.ALL FOOTINGS SHALL BEAR ON UNDISTURBED VIRGIN SOIL HAVING A M NIMUM SAFE BEARING CAPACITIES.SUBSTITUTIONS OF THESE HANGERS FOR DIFFERENT MODEL NUMBERS THAN / CAPACITY OF 2 TONS PER 5Q,FT.BRACE RETAINING WALLS OR FOUNDATION WALLS AS SPECIFIED BY THE ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER IS PORB DDEN WITHOUT VERIFYING THE REPLACEMENT �JII11 G �ThL _ REQUIRED.BACKF.ILL WITH APPROVED MATERIAL,BACKFILLING UNDER SLABS,AROUND PART WITH THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL. (�jkl1A a G c PIERS AND 014 EACH SIDE OF FOUNDATION WALLS SHALL BE DONE IN LAYERS NOT TO EXCEED 10INCHES.COMPACTION.51:Igtl BE 95%OF MAXIMUM DENSITY AT OPTIMUM MOISTURE I ! I LAG.(life(L- ITT 1.64 Rb•��f_I_l,_'( CLIMATIC&GEOGRAPHIC'DESIGN CRITERIA FOR RESIDffNTIAL DISTRCTS _� ,.G".:OU�!� 1h'NV SPEED f 0 s SPEC 1" r 151 L DE!GN WT:AB•I;R�NG�P,OSf 61N ti:.h111E PRO L1I P. DAERIER now R FZ�Z NIC IVIINllA1 11r ZOt�� 5Pi Ep TsFFEL15 kEG'0 l7CDPJ5 ZOr c CAfAG DE eE FED YM-I! 5 '0 Mnl NO NO L 5BVikE 42" Y>=5 15 CLOD FL°M 9.260, . 500 52.2 q(a.-�t) 2L7 pSP. N5/120 NO 3bl CO289r= � 1•�� __.--------- __...___._•_��____ .���'I�, �1-17� -�U�r���i�`I�i�_� -------. �/tih I/6I'I�'-I1-0iI 5 G�L� I�i111�IL�R L -- o VE R M I T# ` O L b-Nit �a u1s�� ►Z-,2-70z1 -0 ', PSI~ DATE APPR ED, JAN. Z 2022 r'10veh (,OLD aF 1° S il�'�,t• RV2oz� HopiNw rzor cp rpm-wac-:z1iz1zoLr BUILDING INSP=�,i or. �ill��e of Rye Brook,NY • 15 sv�b � -2,�� i Village of Rye Brook "Irchitectur i Review Boa* 1�5 G-Approval Date AN 1 9, ? +°�G. 20.2 povg 1H.,�.#cr� ��� "`G�" r0�1 -�G°�-(posl l ra 3'f5 A-IzI�r7���I-� C/�I 13`I I� I :I p I' �. I I-�1{;TML PIPSI I1NL c 1 1/>�LT1C/�I.I' r/l 0 IC, 1-1-1 105 04 1 -HUH I �..'m ics I �I"I�R, ,$Ir I � T ���I-1�'z �14j Z7 3-7�5� ' � '" �- _ '. r- �,{�IL,a'••6o�1'cv -��-- ��c I•t16�.°C I '1�1.(b6KI� ' '1~ 2s1 I o 6 r'o t L At-r $U lL'T 174 5?8GZ ' � :• (.del-4r�.�4,�bv'(' �� )I ><� - ... I H'r�1.E=1��1 MCI rj"I�l-1�.�/�'I-II��TZ'' �-✓t'I�I`�l'���V PC%i�.l,F-4 •• � - r — I TLC. i,� I (e'14 l'I�T��EI I. J �I1 6o IC �I=ao, r6rIZ'1�1z,1 I 1 '• _ -. ar r __. 1 ....... 1.. .......w.. __...... .._ .- , ��5'� �D ARC _... .ram.,•.I�.._ �..I.�.I:'.�._ REV! ....,.....-...-.-.._._. � � ��vr� I/II r II_�I QtyCAr �- 41P1 A , � f N DEC 2 0 2021 _.. _ EU1a DING DA�:'-'DATF �rl% IP' T 1 a 14 G a M P�y11,141G�I Pas I I .. WO,r, . � � � I ' ` `I` '�• __.. � 4 u6 pout •. �•�' .'f� IV • .t1 1 1•�•'•V_IaI Pest(I�r-I%ti IG � � � ��`- � .. EK10 4-w- PLOCP Zoc10�IL'1Cc 0 (i�•�aG� L3 HP f �� � I��•II�ILaIP Pxflo 417OZ� zory -el�L ( � -.- �- � � \ �_.:1.........I•..�i.•rl,_I•nry.,. ,,,,,,.a,.,..o._.•r.tln,i..........-,.........__t' /� f� - rl•I M ova I S�P�trs�l sly'5TI -tuff 6 I'LI I7�L-�oG IaI 3 15l7�LI �6 ChDrNE'f 1 IJ GoFIL;I IKi''o� ... ,__.�...-- -- r bL S (f 1 N�+�I '�r�?I_�{�: Iz.,��rl;-c�!��.-.L�n� ��'�'iul.l�,.l3s_�;3.�1�.�=: I I��:s.�l�„��v�.lr, �.•' ,P w/ (J� tT�%'1! U••}' , .._......,. . . ,...-...r......•....-.•1 rnu.,l�......,,...r.a..-wt•m••••-..-_ „k/1\ II,_p l n.�..f7 � � �/Vt�lfr.IG -•xNl'� ..•n•.rr...l....w.•rmw....�1.r.Nc•t(_. �nr�.... ..w-•I. ....�_.� ... -- .1�� I f ..._ 1 r•,••''':'��::, I t•�+�i Pao: !.��.,GS`L— ,r n� ...ki� n.Q r 5 it P11111•�L('1"'- �1••!JI`1�GE,..... ..�;.,..75.•r�..r. _..____...._..�_..�~ ..._. :I .. 5 --�`^ ••.») HoI:I�.vN1ic1,GI.��.I.pl�rdl::ll%�':.. .(QU...� ..... . ' .._..__ .; • � ����' -�s� - ��� pla .r''��r�i�:���;►ri�..�..1.`.+.'..__�."1- � •-----•-•��°•�-..�..�I._.'3.,—._.r__�`�......._.,_ � �. (iQb FI IIIG n Of, 2x I a I���aNlti U��(l�;v•Iv.r��slti-� �, p�l��it�t%�1=�'����' ... i s f'� z z,1 - ---r ��yet, YJo.. J-nl `irk ^51:� -_._.._.. AO.F-`---�5-�?S__ �s.�s- ._ PI S w�>�.� ��.� �.��s3...�._Z�.,..._.�' Ja[411 G, . .� ` • •, _ �.�,�lut� t-:c�l l�vl a,��....kf���I:����G,���1.r.1:, .Z/��.�'_.�:.---n�.cw(1�•�._..i.ono.C�nro_.r • lu �1�{'f1"a 1,A.f�Go...I��o , .....l�o..�-�wr.!y,�.k��.�h�►n.y�.' yGp�I;TOJ�i f • :Ilan:/a,�11�•�,I�:I..��'���;�G'�:_tMdN 6�►�4'r_;._��y_.......,.._..._.�'.z/,r.�zs?��_,/s,z�_.zrac 1 r � . • IMF x�Tdut!io `nl/! G G °. rTOF hh��lrrV��1 lo'(lrvt �:�cr �'i�c�s.� .��tr�_,.3,s _ as�+y.C�'°�.._. _— :._... . 1 I .._...f —r_._�^- ,°: ,.� 70/1 sq►°*, �~ ' � 'il"'1`�•I�hVI�` I�'�r•�+1_•V It•�`�f`QV�IZ�r1U1.�..�T-l.J.�..50.�•..1...•_....._.._. ..+.�...•..... •.�-.•.• /8� ^-_# /8�c:. ...1,:. Af21'/1 O HK), ' � ;rait,fai�ul�'Nllllwlt }<GG�`��rc�� ,la��r •� ---._..._.....; � I;. • '' • ' �;�,are� uc�lrfak��. I � .. S •',/^/•�p�yj/�1(`�I7�i•. •-•---•-'--..._ ( 1 I'+- I r I 7. SECTIONiZ507' 2020 RESIDENTIAL CODE MINIMUM FOOTING S SIZIZE FOR DECKS TABLE R607.6 t EXTERIOR DECKS LIVE OR LOAD BEARING VALUE OF SOILS''1psq DECK BEAM SPAN LENGTHS'•110(root'Incites) OF NEW YOLK STATE GROUND TRIBUTARY 1500, 2000' 2600' a3000' DECK JOIST SPAN LESS THAN OR EQUAL TO: R507.1 Decks.Wood-(retried decks shall be in accordance SNOW AREA SPECIES' SIZE' (fact) e Sldo of a Olamolor of a Thicknoss Sldo of o' Dlamotor of o tfilckness Sido of a Dlamolor cr a Thlcknoss SI o of o Dlamotor of a Thfcknoss with this SedllOn.For decks using materiels and conditions LOAD (sq.it) s uaro footle round(oath s uaro footle round footle s uaro footing round loolln s uaro labile round(actin e 0 10 12 14 16 to PLYWOOD not prescribed in this section,refer to Section R301. (ps0 q(Inches)g Mchas)B 0neh0e) q Onchos)8 (Inchosy g (Inchaa) q(tnehos)g (Inehds)g O"BIOS) q(Inehos)g Onchas)8 Onch°s) 1-2x6 4-11 1 4-0. 3-7 3.3 3-0 2.10 2.8 SUB-FLOOR R507.2 Materials.Materials used for tie construction of R507.2.2.3 Decay resistance,Plastic composite deck 20 12 14 c 12 IQ 6 12 .14 6 12 14 6 ; decks shall comply with this section. boards,stair treads,guards and handralls containing 40 14 16 6 Iz 14 6 12 14 6 12 14 6 l-2 x 8 5-I I 5-1 4-7 4.2 2-10 4.3 3-5 FLOOR JOISTS l-2 x 10 7-0 G•0 5-5 4-ll 4-7 4.3 4-0 R507.2.1 Wood materials.Wood materials shall be No.2 wood,cellulosic or other biodegradable materials shall 60 17 19 6 15 17 6 13 is 6 12 la 6 - OVERLAPPED @ , grade or better lumber,preservative-treated m accordance be decay resistant In accordance with ASTM D7032, 40 so 20 22 7 17 19 G 15 17 6 14 1G G 1-2 x 12 8-3 7-t 6-4 5-10 5-5 5.0 4.9 , OLD BEARING W LL f with Section R317,or approved,naturally durable lumber, R507.2.2.4 Termite resistance.Where required by 100 22 25 a 19 21 6 17 19 G 15 17 6 2-2 x 6 6-11 5-11 SA 4-10 4-6 4-3 4.0 and termite protected where required in accordance with Section 318,plastic composite deck boards,stair(reads, 120 24 27 9 21 23 7 19 21 6 17 19 G 2-2 x 8 8-9 7-7 6-9 6-2 5-9 5.4 5-0 Section R31 B.Where design Ili accordance with Section guards and hondrails containing Wood cellulosic or 140 26 29 10 22 25 a 20 23 7 18 2i 6 Southern pine; / g gu g , 2-2 X 10 10-4 9-0 8-0 74 6.9 6-4 6.0 I / --FLOOR JOISTS 1 R301 is provided,wood structural members shall be other biodegradable materials shall be tenmlte resistant 160 28 31 II 24 27 9 21 24 8 20 22 7 2-2 x 12 t2-2 10-7 9-5 8-7 8-0 7-6 7•0 ! DOUBLE PLATE(CUT AS designed using ilia wet service factor defined in AWC in accordance with ASTM D7032, 20 12 14 6 12 14 6 12 14 6 12 14 6 REQUIRED) 3-2xG 8-2 7-5 6-8 6-1 5-8 5-3 3-0 NDS.Cuts,notches and drilled holes of preservative- R507,2.2.5 Installation of plastic composites.Plastic 40 Is 17 6 13 Is 6 12 14 6 12 14 G WOOD i -1 treated wood members shall be treated in accordance with , 3-2 X 8 10-10 9-6 8.6 7-9 7-2 G-8 6 4 /- STEEL BEAM voniposlte deck boards,stair treads,guards and hand- Go 19 21 G 16 18 G 4 16 6 13 15 6 Lo��P�r BLOCKING I Section R317.1.1.All preservative-Treated wood products rails sholl be installed in accordont:e with(his code and 3-z x l0 I3.0 l I-3 !0 0 9-2 B-G 7-!I 7.6 ��2 DIA.HARDENED STEEL in contact willi(lie round Shall be labeled for such usage. , so 80 21 24 8 !9 2l G 17 11 6 15 17 6 AS REQ. 1" g g UhetnarmfacllhrersJnstruottons. 100 24 27 9 21 z3 7 I9 zl 6 17 19 6 3-2x 12 15-3 l3.3 ll-l0 10-9 10-0 9.4 8-10 �1Oe� 0 THRU BOLTS R507.2.1.1 Engineered wood products.Engineered R507.2,3 Fasteners and connectors.Metal fasteners and 120 26 30 10 23 26 a 20 23 7 19 21 6 3 x G or2-2 x 6 5-5 4-8 4-2 3-10 3-6 3-1 2-9 �j(f o✓5 _' 1 wood products shrill be in accordance.with Section connectors used for all'decks shall be In accordance widi 140 28 32 11 25 28 9 22 25 s 20 23 7 3 X 8 or2-2 x 8 6-10 5-11 5-4 4-10 4-6 4-1 3.8 ' I _ a'X 3.5"X 8"STEEL PLATE R502. Section R317.3 and Table R507.2.3. 160 30 34 12 26 30 10 24 27 9 21 24 e 3 x 10 or2-2 x 10 8-4 7-3 6.6 5-11 5-6 5-1 4.8 STEEL BEAM WELDED TO COLUMN R507.2.2 Plastic composite deck boards,stalk treads, R507.2.4 Flashing.Fleshing shall be corrosion-resistant 20 12 14 6 12 14 6 12 14 6 12 M 6 guards,or handralls.Plastic'composite exterior deck metal of nominal thickness not less than 0.019.inch(0.48 40 16 19 c 14 16 6 13 14 6 12 14 6 Douglas fir-lorch', 3 x l2 or2-2 x 12 9•B 8.5 T-G 6-l0 6-4 5-11 5-7 BEAM BUILD OUT boards,stair treads,guards and handralls shall comply mm)or approved nonmetallic material(lint is compatible 60 20 z3 7 I7 20 6 t6 le G 14 16 6 hem-fir', 4 x 6 6.5 5•6 4-11 4-6 4-2 3-11 3-8 - _ with the requirements of ASTM D7032 and this section. with the substrate of the structure a and the deckin mated- redwood, spruce -fir, q x g 8.5 7-3 G G 5 11 5.6 5.2 4-10 NOT TO SCALE _ g EO 23 2G 9 20 23 7 IB 20 6 16 19 6 redwood R507.2.2.1 Labeling.Plastic composite deck boards als. OD IGO 26 29 10 22 25 a 20 23 7 la 21 6 western cedar;, 4 X 10 9-11 8-7 7-8 7.0 G-G 6-1 5-8 and stair treads,or their packaging,shall bear a label R507.2.5 Altarmite materials.Alternative materials, P 3"STEEL COLUMN 120 za 32 Il 25 28 9 22 25 B 20 23 7 pondcroea Ire' 4 x 12 1!-S 9-L1 B•10 8-1 7•G 7.0 6-7 that indicates compliance with ASTM D7032 and hlcludlug glass nod metals,shall be permitted. 140 31 35 12 27 30 10 24 27 9 2z 2a 8 red pine' 3-2xG 7-4 G-8 G-0 5-G 5-1 4-9 4-G 1 Includes die allowable load and maximum allowable WALL BASE PLATE span determined in accordance with ASTM D7032, R507.3 Footings.Decks shall be supported on concrete foot- t6o 33 37 13 28 3z 11 2s z9 10 z3 z6 9 3-2 x 8 9-8 8-6 7-7 G-I1 6-5 G-0 5-8 - Plastic or composite handrails and guards,or their 11193 or other approved structural systems designed•lo accom- 20 12 14 6 12 14 6 t2 14 6 12 14 6 3-2 x 10 12.0 10-5 9-4 8-6 7-10 7-4 G-1l f k hodate all-loads In accordance•wide Section R301.Deck 4D' 18 20 6• IS l7 6 14 15 G I2 14 G - -- - packeging;'Shall be6r Ii labs(filet Itldlcdte's liolTlplianc6"" � 3-2 x 12 13-11 12-1 10•9 9-10 9-1 8•G 8-I • with ASTM D7032 and includes ilia maximum allow- footings alinll be sized to carry the imposed loads from the 60 21 24 a 19 21 G 17 19 G IS 17 6 _ able span deternined In ai3cordnnce with A113TM deck structure to the ground as shown In Figure R507.3.The go 25 26 9 21 24 a 19 22 7 18 20 G Forst:I Bich-25.4 mm,1 foot-304.8 min,I pound per equate foot-0.0479 kPo,I pound-0.454 kg. D7032. footing depth shall be in accordance with Section R403.1.4. 70 100 28 31 11 24 27 9 21 24 8 20 22 7 a.Donis snow load,live land-40 tali dead land-10 psf,UA-3G0 at main span,UA-I60 at eantltever with a 220-pound point la d applied at the and. _ b.Beanie supporting deck J°Isle from one side only. R507.2.2.2 Flame spread Index.Plastic composite Exception: Free-standing decks consisting of joists 120 30 34 12 26 30 to 24 27 9 21 24 8 c.No.2grede,wet service factor, deck boards stair treads,guards,and handrails shall directly supported on grade over their entire length. 140 33 37 13 26 32 11 25 29 10 23 26 9 d Deain depth shall be greater lhnn or equal to depth of joists with a flush beam condition, a„ e.includes Incising factor, a X G X 8 STEEL PLATE ,h exhibit aflame spread index not exceeding 200 when R507.3.1 Minimum size.The ttthnimum size of concrete 160 35 40 IS 30 34 12 27 31 11 25 29 9 f.Nordiem species.lacishugrnator not Included. WELDED TO COLUMN tested A►accordance with ASTM E84 or UL 723 with footings shall be in accordance with Table R507.3.1, For SI:1 Inch=25.4 ma,I square root^0.0929 in',t pound per equate foot-0.0479 kPa c.Assume miahnumn square footing to be 12 Incites x 12 Inches x G Incites for 6 x 6 post. g Bean canll(evere ate limited to die adjncent beant's Span divided by 4. i the test specimen remaining In place during the test. based on tie tributary area and allowable soil-bearing P.lnierpolntlon permitted,extmpo!°tlon n0,permincd, d,lrthe support Is a brick or CMU pier,the footing shell have a minlmum 2-Inch projection an all sides. I 2"DIA.X G"HARDENED STEEL e ' Exception:Plastic composites determined to be pressure in accordance with Table R401.4.1. b.Based on Idghcst load cnso:Dead+Live or Dead+Snow. B.Arco,In Pquare feel,of deck surface supported by post and fuclhigs. TABLE R607.9.1.3(l) ANCHOR BOLTS APPDXIED TO noncombustible. DECK LEDGER CONNECTION T BAND JOIST R607.0.2 Declt oast lateral restraint Joist ends and (Deck live land°40 psf,deck dead load=10 psf,snow load s 40 psO MASONRY TABLE R507.2 3 n, beating locations shall be provided with lateral resistance 5"MINIMUM FOR JOIST SPAN e_oHr-n,0 FASTENER AND CONNECTOR SPECIFICATIONS FOR DECKS" BEAM SPLICES CONNECTION DETAILS 6'orrd less 6'1'toe 6'1 t°70' loll"to 12' 12'1"to 14' 14'1'l016' 76'1"to 18 to prevent r0tatlDn.Where lateral restraint is provided by REM MATERIAL MINIMUM FINISHICOATING ALTERNATE FINISH(COATING SEAM SPLICE (iF REQUIRED) '��� On-canter spacing of fastonars I joist hangers or blocking between joists,their depth shall (IF REQUIRED)_ .-'" In accordance whit Stainless steel,sllfcon bronze or MUSTOCCLltz _ �� '/-Inch diameter to screw with I/-hid( i Nails and Umber rivets Hot-dipped galvanized per ASTM A 153 equal not less than 60 percent of tho joist depth.Where lot- `' ' g ' 30 23 18 15 13 11 10 ASTM F16G7 copper ovER POST �'`; _ maximum sheathing`•) oral restraint is provided by rite joists Utley 61,a,1 be �- _ --_, STEEL BEAM DETAILS Bolls' 1n accordance with Hot-dipped galvanized per ASTM A153,Gnss C O 0�` %-Inch diameter bolt with maximum secured to the end of cacti Joist with not fewer thou Three o a 36 36 34 29 24 21 19 Log screws'' ASTM•A307(bolts), (Class D for'/e-Inch diameter and less)or mcchnni-Stainless steel silicon bronze or ;•, '7 O sheathing (includingaura and ASTM A563 nuts call galvanized per ASTM B695,Class 55 or 410 copper l Od(3-Inch by 0.128-Inch)(76 mm by 3.3 mm)nails or _o°o , , NOT TO SCALE ( )' y e Pthree No.lox 3-inch 76 mm long wood screws. �'•�•.� '�` /,-inch diameter bolt with 1-loch mnxhna"1 36 36 29 24 21 18 16 - washers) 4STM F844(washers) stainless steel ( ) g �Y11_ I shesihing ASTM A653 typo(It85 zinc cooled galvanized R607.7 Decking. allowable spacing for orals sup- APPROVED '' J g g P g j p- POST CAP For SI:I I uh a 25.4 oral,I loaf=304.8 nun,1 pound per square fool=0.0479 ken• Per mnnnfaeturer's steel or post hot-dipped galvanized per ASTM porting decking shall be in accordance with Table R507.7. a.Ledgers shall be flashed In cecordoneo with Section R703.4 to prevent water front contacting ilia house bond Johl. ' Metal connectors p p�g P Stainless steel P g g 6 ' specfication A]23 providing a minimum average coaling Wood decking shall be altaehed to each supporting member BEAM OVER POST CAP BEAM OVER POST b.Snow land shall not be assumed to act conctarenlly with dive loud. -- weigh(of 2.0 oz./fl'(total Will sides)• with not less that.two 8d thrended nails Or two No,8 wood c.The lip of tho Jog screw shall fully extend beyond the inside face 0rihe bond joist. � For Si:I licit-2SA rani,I foot-304,8 nnm. screws.Other approved decking Or fastener systems shall be d Sheathing shall be wood tt d to pond or ttelusolid sawn(umber. a.Equivalent nnateriuts,coatings Find llntsltea shorn be penniticd, installed in accordance with ilia manufacturer's installaton For SI:I Inch-25A inn. a.5healhing shall be permitted to be wood slniclvral parer,gypsum banrd,fibertnaard,lumbar or loom elieathing Up to/,-Inch thleknoss of slacked washes b.Fnstcners and connectors exposed to colt wrier or located within 300 leer of n soli water shoreline elicit b°stainless steal. shall be permillod to subsllh to for up to 1/1 Inch of allowable shendting lllckneas whore combined with wood structural panel or Inntber sheathing. a Holai for bolts shall be drilled n ndnhtrum i/„inch and a nmximbni 4,a Inch larger tine Ilse bolt requirements. DECK BEAMTO DECK POST d.Lag sorows I/,Inch and larger shall be pr°drilled to nv6ld wood splitting per the National Deslgin Specification(NDS)for Wood Canstnncll°n. R507.8 Vertical and lateral supports.Where supported by ,';` '' TABLE R607.8.1.3(2) 1 e.Stainless-site(-driven fasteners stall be In accordance with ASTM F)667. #MI IMUM 21. MOM�� � PLACEMENT OF LAG SCREWS AND BOLTS IN DECK LEDGERS AND BAND JOISTS attachment to an exterior-well,decks shall be positively anchored to tltt:primary structure and designed for both verli- MINIMUM END AND EDGE DISTANCES AND SPACING BETWEEN ROWS IV MIN r-MANUFACTURED POST CONNECTOR oat and lateral loads.Shell alloolnment shall not be accom- " 1 �:a_.._> TOP EDGE BOTTOM EDGE ENDS ROW SPACING IN ALLOWABLE BOILS / dished b the use of toenails or nails sub act to whthdrnwal, '..NdL�;Pl:Yi91�i OR :MULTIPLE-PLY�EAIi� %, I Ledger' 2 tnoltesd '/s Incl. 2 lushes' l'/e indies6 TYPICAL PT POST P Y ,. .,:t� '•'. ,�, .,, r s s e w ti' For decks with cantilevered framing members,connection to it, •, i Band Joist /4 inch 2 Inches 2 inches` 1/,Inches r `0 . exterior walls or other flaming members shall be designed and j2j11V,b1AMEliEF y� For sit I Indi-25A mitt. ` constructed to resist uplift resulting from the full live load}1 12 r g a� TFIIZO l3});�,�71.'i`�,• n .+ o.Lag screws or bolts elicit bo etnggercd from ilia top(a die Talton along the horizoilnl run of ilia deck ledger in occ°nlcnce vllh Figure R507.9.7.3(1). _ spaclfted In Table R301.5 acting on the cantilevered portion of y ' �'bli �l?1tdtV��7� 1�*" b Mnximmn s Inchaa. GRADE <1NA( „ e.For engineered rIn jolsis,ilia runnufacluier'a recomaendntio 3 shall govenn. tlD, 6GJill?k��l 1 E()1110 u i t�7EriRi the deck.Where positive connection to(he printery building <` ,' 1. structure canhot be verified during inspection,decks shall be + , C�6N�IS{I��v^F'' ; d The nrinilmum distance from Talton row of lag eerays or b°1►s to the lop edge of ono Icdger slinll be in°eeord°sea wllli Flgua RS07.9.1.3(1). !.. -- •', ,, self-supporting. r 'of 9 w ` ; z,+ STAGGER FASTENERS _ - o a i ,..•' y.t<• I t" IN 2 ROWS R507.9 Vertical and lateral supports at band jolst.Vertical i pt�T'j�(bH', �; • c �., r J3 r• and lateral supports for decks shall comply with this section, (^" / (-'' j '%'+' h--r'�Jr►►' r'f ''s A Bp�G•• U 6.6'MIN.FOR 2 X 8' 'DISTANCE SHALL BE PERP/IITTED TO U c� DIAMETER / PP f p �Nf 6 MAX ® ® ® 6.6'MIN.FOR 2 X 10 BE REDUCED TO 4.5"I1'LAG SCREWS (SCf(� � S/i•I/�G Z', �' - � R507.0.I Vertical supports,Vertical loads shall be trans- ,;.• t' � / L_ DEPTH t.= PER TABLE THROUGH BOLTS f �EAf$}L� i-•••- LL- 7.6"MIN.FOR 2)C 12 ARE USED OR BOLT SPACING IS PER TABLE - IN BOTH DIRECTIONS f ferred to band joists with ledgers in accordance with this .•-•,. �'s\ ;c ® ® ® REDUCED TO THAT OF LAG SCREWS OTE:OTSCREWS / MINIMUM 12' section. t - --- / OF EMBEDMENT , .Z�', �"e TO ATTACH 2 X 8 LEDGERS TO 2 X 8 4'GRAVEL-- Ledger ,4` r{t• BAND JOISTS. R507.9.1.1 Led er details.Deck led ers shall be a I____.].w 2 MIN, g g _ � r^"-`•" LEDGER LAG SCREW OR BOLT 314 MIN. minintuin 2-inch by 8-inch(51 mm by 203 nim)DOM- r 1 1W''ll; 5 NOTE: 5 POSTS MUST BE CENTERED ON OR IN f:OOTING not, pressure-preservative trenied Southern pine, ) Incised pressure-prdservn(ive-trented hem-fir, or =1_nr,---- 7 T^ 1 l Forst(1Inch-z5.4Winn. / For SI:I Inch-25.4 niai. approved,naturally durable,No.2 grade or better rum- 1, i FIGURE R507.9.1.3(1) �O�'N (�, FIGURE R507.3 bar.Deck ledgers shall not support concentrated loads PLACEMENT OF LAG SCREWS AND BOLTS IN LEDGERS DECK POSTS TO DECK FOOTING CONNECTION front beams or girders.Deck ledgers shall not be sup- R507.5 Deck beams,Maximum allowable spans for*ood ported on stone or masonry veneer. R507,3.2 Minimum depth.Deck footings sl►all extend deck booms,its shown In Figure R507.5,shall Bain accordance below the frost line specified in Table R301.2(1)in accor- R507.0.1,2 Band joist details.Band joists supporting a EXTERIOR SHEATHING with Table R507.5.Beata plies shall be fastened with two rows For SI:I loch-25.4 mm. dance with Section R403.1.4.1. ledger shall be a minimum 2-inch-nominal(51 hum), of IOd(3-inch,X 0.128-inch)nails minimum at l6 inches(40G FIGURE R5D7.6.1(2) EXISTING STUD WALL--� Exceptions: lnm on center 01DII each ed e.Beams shall be cnnitted to solid sawn,spruce-pine-fir h 5 better lumber or a mien- 2 �� n P ) g g P t NOTCHED POST-TO-BEAM CONNECTION 1.Free-standing decks(het meet all of Uie following :cantilever at each end tip to one-fourth of the allowable bean morn 1Dnch as i/,-Inch r, lout x 241 mm)u mes- criteria: spnn.Deck beams of other materials shall be permitted where slannl,Douglas fir or Teller,laminated veneer)umber. RIM STRPRIMARY UCTURE PRIMARY EXISTING 2x REDBAN JOIST I Ltr 1.1.The joists bear directly on precast con- designed in accordance wilt accepted engineering practices. Band Joists sba(I bear fully 0u die primary structure FOR CANTILEVERED STRUCTURE OR ENGINEERED RIM BOARD capable of supporting all required loads. J01ST5 I�a�'�IC•j I� Crete pier blocks at grade without'sup- R507,5,1 Deck bean,bearing.The ends of beams shall BLOCK NO OR n port by beams or posts,. t OTHER LATERAL '24 MIN. DECK JOIST have not less than l/s Inches(38 mm)of bearing 0n wood R507.�.1.3 Ledger to bend joist details.Fasteners RESTRAINT LEDGER LEDGER 1.2.The area of the deck does not exceed 200 or metal and not less than 3 Inches(76 min)of bearing on used in deck ledger counectitins In aecordnnee with REQU RED OVER BOARD JOIST BOARD square feet 18,9 or2, BEAM 1-010°°MIN. q ( ) concrete or masonry for the entire width of the beam. Table R507.9.1.3(1)shall be hot-dipped galvanized m' 5"MAX. 1.3.The walking surface Is not more than 20 Where multiple-span beams bear oh intermediate posts, staluless steel and shall be installed in nccordance with •2 MIN. LAG SOREW5 OR BOLTS inches(616 mm)above grade at any each ply musk have NII beating on tie pas(in accordance Table R507.9.1.3(2)and Figures R507.9.1.3(I)and point within 3G inches(9l4►rim)nte0- with Figures R507,5.1(1)and R507S.](2). R507.9.1.3(2), t JOIST JOISTS---, sulefl horizontally from the edge. JDlsrs HANGER o c R507.5.2 Deck beam connection to supports,Deck R507.0.1.4 Alternate ledger details.Alternate from- HANGER BEaM EACH END FLOOR FRAMING o a':o 2.Free-sland{Dg decks need not be provided with PP g BEAM •o¢e.o;o JOIST HANGER i 2 �I� footings dint extend below the frost line. beams shall be attached to supports In a manner capable bf' lug configurations supporting a ledger constructed to o'P• EXISTING- ••�•'�o•o transferring vertichl loads and resisting horizontal dis- meet the lond requirements of Section R301,5 shall be PosT(BEYOND) POSTIBEYOND) / FOUNDATION WALL ''a R507.4 Deck posts.For single-level wood-flamed decks )acenlenk Deck beam connections to wood oils shall be permitted. with beams sized Jn accordance with Table R507.5,deck post P P size shah)be In accordance with Table R507.4. in accordance with Figures R507.5.I(])and R507.5.1(2). JOIST SPAN MEASURED For Sln I Inch-25.4 mat. Manufactured post-to•beam connectors shell be sized for R507.0.2 Lateral connection.Lateral loads shall be trans- OPTIONAL-JOIST SPAN CENTERLINE TO CENTERLINE (Ile post and Tenor to-be Bolls connectors shall have 11 be[S Under' ferrod l0 Uie ground or to a structum-capable Of hansiilit CANTILEVER OF JOISTHANGERS FIGURE R607.9.1.3(2) p PLACEMENT OP LAG SCREVVS AND BOLTS 1N BAND JOIST$ TABLE R507.4 the bend and nut. tia them to the round.Where the Intern)load connection I CANTILEVERED JOISTS WITH DROPPED BEAM JOISTS WITH FLUSH BEAM DECK POST HEIGHT' is provided i»accordance with Figure R507.9.2(1),hold- �I 1 O MAXIMUM HEIGHT' R507.G,1 Deco joist bearing,The ends oEJo,sts shall have down tension devices shall be Installed In not less than two RIM OECK POST SIZE (foot•inchoo) not less than lI/2 inches(38 mm)of bearing on wood or 4 x 4 6-9' metal and not less than 3 Inches(76 mm)of beating on locations per deck,within 24 inches(610 mm)of each cud of tie deck.Each device shall have oil allowable stress FOR CANTILEVERED JOISTS HOLD•DOWN OR SIMILAR concrete or meson over its entire width.Joists bearing LATER BLOCKINGO OTHER RESTRAINT 4 x G 8 masonry g design capacity of not Tess than 1,500 pounds(6672 N). LATERAL RESTRAINT TENSION DEVICE 6 x 6 14 on top of a mulliple-ply beam or ledger slinll be fastened Where the lateral load connections are provided in nccor- REQUIRED OVER BEAM JOIST 8 x 8 14 in accordance with Table R602.3(l).Joists bearing on tap dance with Figure R507.9.2(2,the hold-down tension FLOOR SHEATHING NAILING AT , of a single-ply beam or ledger shall be attached by a g ) J MAXIMUM.NTH ON CENTERTO For SI:I such=25.4 mm,l foul-304.8 mm, devices el)alt be installed lu not less Then four locations per JOIST WITH HOLD-DOWN I pound per squnro foot 0.0479 kPo, mechanical connector.Joist framing into the side of a deck,and each device shall have an allowable stress y� a Measured to the dnderside o/rite beam, beam or ledger board shall be supported by approved joist design capacity of not less than 750 pounds(3336 N). JOIST JOISTS p '�L r�G b.Based on 40 psf llvd Iona: hangers. roi9r BEAM HANGER o.Tha maxhnuin pannllled holghl Is 8 feel for ace-ply and hvo•ply beams. __ __ BEAM EAOH END The it minium penitllled height for ihrca-p)y beams ch post cap Is 6 feet 9 JOIST + + + + + + Inches. POST(BEYOND) POST(BEYOND) + + I- + R507.4.1 Detk post to deck footing connection.Where L.-- --j -- --° posts bear on concrete footings in accordance with Section SeAM eP�W R403 and Figure R507.4.1,lateral restraint shall be pro- --JOIST SPAN . JOIST BPAN MEASURED vided by manufactured connectors or a minimum post POST POST OPTIONAL OPTIONAL CENTERLINE TO HANGERS embedment Of 12 inches(305 mini in surrounding 60118 or CANTILEVER CANTILEVER OF JOIST HANOER6 concrete piers,Other footing systems shall be permitted, JOISTS ON FREE-STANDING DECK FLOOR Jo sT DEcu JOIST JOISTS DROPPED l3DEINAMDECK WITH FLUSH BEAM Exception:Where expansive,compressible,shifting or other questionable soils ate present,surrounding soils �\Sp A9 P1IQNAL aEAM6PAN 6EAMSPAN O�T1DtIAl OPTIONAL BEAMSPAN 6EAAI SPA N GMTILE R 41 shall not be relied on for lateral support. CAtfTILEVER CANMLEVER CANMLNEF FIGURE R5o7,6 e� ,% TYPICAL DECK JOIST SPANS w2 p i i DR13PPED BEAM FLUSH BEAM For Sh l inch-25.4 mm. G FIGURE R607,6 FIGURE R607.9.2(1) * t --- TYPICAL DECK JOIST SPANS 4j, ' DECK ATTACHMENT FOR LATERAL LOADS fl.P.O. DocuSign Envelope ID:D8C227D0-258F-4F1 E-BA1 D-1 g717C1 C8840 0:3 s N 80'44'40" W 0•4 G S A ,g Aluminum Fence 144.70 o,g ' Stone Wall m i 7 N c d ^ a, 4 rn IS O) LO Paver"Patio' , 20.6 Swimming Pool Tub 3 Balcony Roof Over � Stone Curb , IP lotfor , 22.1' 'i Story FAO c Pool !'s Equip. _ 0 IN43:T orrA v 2 Story C Frame Dwelling ' o No. 12 I • 0 L w 1 Story 22.2 43.7 R/G Plat. :• �, LLJ Al Paver 1�Y!<~ o • G t "ti y :. LO DO C i7 0 voi d a z �3 S 80'44'40" E . . 120.091 -Stone Apron Y b S 3 BIRCH LANE Richard A. Spinelli �Q� / � �O 650 Halstead Avenue ��` AI S,o ep Mamaroneck, N. Y. 10543 �� Survey of Lot 40 as shown on, Subdivision Plat9 c_� ,� ►i� ;,;r ,,�.:_ ri`a� (914) 381--2357 •'` Red Roof Form, Villa e of R e Brook ���� � a �, ,1 :, ; a N.Y.S. Lic. Land Surveyor Westchester County, N.Y. - I p t y AS-BUILT No. 49240 Filed on November 25, 1998 as Mo No. 26266� QCT 18 20Z] � �- DOCUMENT tt 49240 0 _ �;� Scale 1"=2 0' August 26, 2021 � '."��. �� " ...� Unauthorized additions to or alterations of this /\'�/�{J]j�/(f VILLAGE ���� ;�`�_ �y. BROOK • • • S� ! y r~c:�,^� 1 i ati t•t `' 3 na r r 9 plan is a violation of Section 7209 of the N.Y.S. ND ��.r;l�..,_�_NJIG i .. ::• � ��l��a� Education Law. _ :z. . ... .. .. . ... r ..