The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2019.10.22 900 King Street Project Slide Show PresentationOCTOBER 22, 2018900 KING STREET REDEVELOPMENT ●DEIS Public Hearing 900 King Street SEQRA REVIEW PROCESS DEIS PROCEDURAL FLOW CHART June 27, 2017 Village Declared Intent to be SEQRA Lead Agency January 9, 2018 Public Scoping Session January 23, 2018 Lead Agency Approves Scope May 4, 2018 Applicant Prepares Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) Lead Agency Reviews DEIS For Completion DEIS Revised As Needed By Applicant September 12, 2018 Lead Agency Issues Notice Of Completion Of DEIS Schedules Public Hearing October 22, 2018 SEQRA & Zoning Public Hearing Comment Period Preparation Of Final EIS Lead Agency Adopts Statement Of Findings and Ends SEQRA Process June 5, 2017 Submit Zoning Petition WE ARE HERE August –November 2017 Meetings with Planning Board Detailed Site Plans and Environmental Analyses Submitted December 18, 2017 Village Declares Lead Agency & Requires a DEIS Draft Scope Published Action on Zoning & PUD Concept Plan Site Plan Review & Permitting HARKNESS PARK Hutchinson River Parkway We are Here -17.77 acres •7.46 ac. impervious (42%) •0.807 ac impervious within wetland buffer -215,000sf building •595 surface parking spaces •46.5 feet above grade (fascia height) HARKNESS PARK Hutchinson River Parkway We are Here -Senior Living (55+) •160 units Independent Living •85 units Assisted Living •24 IL Townhouses -445,000sf total buildings •300 parking spaces (173 underground) •Reduce impervious coverage (11% less) 900 King Street PUD CONCEPT PLAN MEASURING THE DENSITY OF THE PROJECT -Twice the floor area of current building (215k 445k) -Half of the parking spaces (595 300) •5.3 acres contiguous surface parking  •197 underground/inside parking spaces; 6 small surface lots -Reduced impervious coverage (11% reduction) -Significantly less peak hour traffic •79% fewer peak AM trips •65% fewer peak midday trips •70% fewer peak PM trips -Significantly more tax revenue –350% increase •$533,078 $1,845,869 900 King Street PUD CONCEPT PLAN OVERALL SITE PLAN 900 King Street 900 King Street 900 King Street HEIGHT COMPARISON HEIGHT COMPARISON 900 King Street HEIGHT COMPARISON HEIGHT COMPARISON 2-Stories 900 King Street HEIGHT COMPARISON HEIGHT COMPARISON 2-Stories 3-Stories 900 King Street HEIGHT COMPARISON HEIGHT COMPARISON 2-Stories 3-Stories 4-Stories 900 King Street HEIGHT COMPARISON HEIGHT COMPARISON 900 King Street HEIGHT COMPARISON HEIGHT COMPARISON 46.5’ –top of fascia (53’ to mechanical) 900 King Street HEIGHT COMPARISON HEIGHT COMPARISON 46.5’ –top of fascia (53’ to mechanical) Ridge –34’ to 38’ 900 King Street HEIGHT COMPARISON HEIGHT COMPARISON 46.5’ –top of fascia (53’ to mechanical) Ridge –34’ to 38’ Ridge –46.5’ to 48’ 900 King Street HEIGHT COMPARISON HEIGHT COMPARISON 46.5’ –top of fascia (53’ to mechanical) Ridge –34’ to 38’ Ridge –46.5’ to 48’ Ridge (peak) –53.5’ to 57.5’ 900 King Street VISUAL CHARACTER -EXISTING 900 King Street VISUAL CHARACTER -EXISTING 900 King Street PROJECT SITE HARKNESS PARK BLIND BROOK HIGH SCHOOL ARBORS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION VISUAL CHARACTER -PROPOSED 900 King Street PROJECT SITE HARKNESS PARK BLIND BROOK HIGH SCHOOL ARBORS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION VISUAL CHARACTER -PROPOSED 900 King Street ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION -Traffic Counts •March 2017 and January 2018 – school in session •Hutch Pkwy ramp to N. Ridge St. clarified as part of study during DEIS completeness •Counted June 22, 2018 (follow-up counts planned for fall) •Adjusted based on counts at N. Ridge and King St. –DEIS basis •Follow-up counts confirmed DEIS volumes were reflective of traffic conditions -Trip Generation •79% fewer peak AM trips •65% fewer peak midday trips •70% fewer peak PM trips -Traffic Analysis •No significant adverse impact on any study area intersection •Certain study area intersections would see beneficial change -Pedestrian Circulation •Internal sidewalks •Extend walking path for school 900 King Street ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS ALTERNATIVES -No Action •Not responsive to market conditions •No reduction in impervious coverage •Increase in traffic from Project -Residential As-of-Right •Slightly less Site disturbance •Visual character similar to Arbors •Slightly fewer traffic trips •±49 school children -Senior Living As-of-Right •Similar physical impacts to as-of-right •Fewer EMS calls than Proposed Project •Greater use of Village’s senior services -Reduced Density (20%) •Slightly less impervious and building coverage than Project •4-story IL bldg, slightly reconfigured •Lower on-site population and taxes •Slightly fewer trips than Project -Reduced Unit Size & 3-Story •More impervious and building coverage than Project •Extremely inefficient IL building, longer west wing, 3rd front wing added •Similar traffic generation to Project -Proposed Project at 62+ •Same physical impacts as Project •Less potential for school children OCTOBER 22, 2018900 KING STREET REDEVELOPMENT ●DEIS Public Hearing