Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2016-04-14 - Planning Board Meeting Documents VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK PLANNING BOARD VILLAGE HALL, 938 KING STREET Thursday, January 14, 2016 - 7:30 p.m. ROLL CALL MINUTES • Review of June 2015 minutes AFFORDABLE HOUSING • Review of a Site Plan Application, Wetlands and Steep Slopes permit application by Buckingham Partners/ Sun Homes for a Planned Unit Development, with a Fair and Affordable Housing component located at 1100 King Street Rye Brook,NY, Parcel I.D. 129.25-1-1 • Steep Slopes Public Hearing • Site Plan Report and Recommendation to BOT • Review of a FAH Rezoning Petition, Subdivision and Lot 1 Site Plan Application for construction of two multi-family affordable dwellings on proposed Lot 1 (BOT Referral), Site Plan Applications for proposed Lots 2 and 3 to be improved with one market rate single family dwelling on each lot, and Wetland and Steep Slopes Permit Applications, for property located at 259 North Ridge Street, Rye Brook NY, Parcel I.D. 135.35-1-11 PUBLIC HEARING • Review of a Site Plan Application by John and Tonia Annunziata,to construct additions to the existing single-family dwelling on the property located at 5 Argyle Road, Rye Brook NY, Parcel I.D. 135.51-1-50 CONTINUED BUSINESS • Review of a Site Plan and Wetland Permit Application by 3 Edgewood Drive LLC, to tear down and construct a single-family dwelling on the property located at 3 Edgewood Drive, Rye Brook NY, Parcel I.D. 135.36-1-31 • Application has been adjourned to the February 11, 2016 meeting NEW BUSINESS • Review of Site Plan & Steep Slopes Applications by Wilfred Rohde P.E. on behalf of Douglas and Lisa Levine, to legalize work performed without a permit 1 including regrading and constructing retaining walls at the property located at 34 Bellefair Road, Rye Brook NY,Parcel I.D. 124.73-1-63 LOCAL LAW CONSIDERATION ACTION ON NON-AGENDA MATTERS • Discussion concernine Board Rules and Prospective Amendments NEXT MEETING FEBRUARY 11,2016 Chairman Goodman welcomed everyone present and at home to tonight's meeting. He introduced the Board and the Staff and went over the rules of procedure for addressing the Board. Chairman Goodman called for the first item on the agenda: MINUTES • Review of June 2015 minutes There being no comments or questions, Chairman Goodman asked for a motion to approve the minutes and on a motion made by Mrs. Schoen and seconded by Mr. Accurso,the minutes were approved when Mr. Nowak called the roll: MR. ACCURSO YES MR. GRZAN YES MR. MORLINO YES MR. RICHMAN YES MRS. SCHOEN YES MR. TARTAGLIA YES CHAIRMAN GOODMAN YES Chairman Goodman called for the next item on the agenda: AFFORDABLE HOUSING • Review of a Site Plan Application, Wetlands and Steep Slopes permit application by Buckingham Partners/ Sun Homes for a Planned Unit Development, with a Fair and Affordable Housing component located at 1100 King Street Rye Brook,NY, Parcel I.D. 129.25-1-1 • Steep Slopes Public Hearing • Site Plan Report and Recommendation to BOT 2 Mr. William Null of Cuddy &Feder addressed the Board on behalf of Sun Homes and gave an update on the application stating that they had submitted a response to staff and consultant concerns on December 23rd and that they are here tonight to answer any additional questions the Board or staff may have. In his opinion only minor details remain to be resolved. Chairman Goodman responded that previously the Board had opened a Public Hearing on the steep slopes application and it was also considering a report and recommendation to the Board of Trustees. Chairman Goodman asked Mrs. Timpone-Mohamed, Village Planning Consultant,to address the Board. Mrs. Timpone-Mohamed discussed the issue of the waiver for the amount of gross floor area per acre. It is currently still an open item in that the Board of Trustees must provide that waiver if the application moves forward. In regard to the PUD site plan—one issue remains related to the 60Ldn Westchester Airport noise contour Critical Environmental Area, and the need to provide sound mitigating construction. Also,the applicant should develop and submit a construction management plan for the project. The applicant was granted its wetlands permit extension at the Board of Trustees meeting of December 15, 2015 so that that item is now closed. The grading plan was slightly altered to reduce the area of disturbance in the northeast corner of the property closest to Bellefair. The applicant has minimized and mitigated the amount of grading necessary. Regarding the buffer areas adjacent to Bellefair and Doral Green that are naturally wooded,there is concern that some of the work may impact the trees in these areas. While it is recommended that the trees not be removed,they should be examined by an arborist to determine if they remained healthy after construction. If trees must be removed, there should be a replanting requirement to maintain the effectiveness of the screening the buffer provides. There have been issues with other PUD's in the past when, after approval, residents ask for amendments to the site plan. The applicant has said that it would not allow changes in the homes themselves; however, there should be a way to accommodate some of the typical things homeowners like to add such as shed's, enlarged patios, etc. The Applicant was to submit draft guidelines for such improvements. Mr. Null responded that they would replace any trees that needed to be removed for construction purposes as they want an appropriate buffer with healthy trees. In regard to PUD modifications, the Applicant is happy to work with the Village on draft guidelines legislation. An individual owner would have to ask the Homeowners Association to approve any changes on the property. The Applicant stated that it is well aware of circumstances of other PUD's and are willing to work with the Village to avoid issues on the Sun Homes property. Mr. Dolph Rotfeld, Village Engineering Consultant, addressed the Board with regard to engineering items. Currently the applicant has answered all of the comments given to them. Mr. Rotfeld advised the Board that he had a meeting with Suez Water and advised the company of the concerns of the Village regarding water pressure. He suggested a specific test protocol to simulate conditions that may affect water pressure in surrounding 3 developments to determine if such effects would happen to water pressure and flow. The water company discussed the changes they are making to increase the flow capacity of their pumping station. There will be no individual meters—hydrants are to be owned by the Village of Rye Brook and a maintenance agreement will have to be entered into. Mrs. Schoen asked if there are no individual meters—how is the water company going to determine how much water will be used by each individual home. Mr. Accurso asked why there are no meters in the houses. Mr. Rotfeld responded that he does not really know, but believes that the Water Company does not want to go onto private streets. Mr. Accurso asked Mr. Rotfeld if the Applicant took into account the numbers in the report in regard to the additional 11,000 square feet of impervious surfaces that the Applicant says can be added in the future by site plan amendments,—specifically the 68% runoff capture requirement. Mr. Rotfeld replied there would be no detrimental effect. Mr. Tartaglia asked what part of the water supply system will be the Village's obligation to maintain after the project is done and in service, and what part will be the HOA's responsibility. Mr. Rotfeld responded that it would be the complete responsibility of the HOA. The HOA will determine the individual billing for water for each individual home—there would have to be an agreement in the offering plan. Chairman Goodman asked Mrs. Gray to read a summary of the report and recommendation to the Board of Trustees: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION FROM THE RYE BROOK PLANNING BOARD TO THE RYE BROOK BOARD OF TRUSTEES ON AN APPLICATION BY SUN HOMES FOR APPROVAL OF A PUD SITE PLAN FOR A RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY OF 110 SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1100 KING STREET APPLICATION OVERVIEW The Rye Brook Board of Trustees is currently considering an application by Sun Homes ("Applicant") for approval of a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Site Plan for a residential community consisting of 110 dwelling units on real property located at 1100 4 King Street (the "Property"). Specifically, the Applicant seeks approval of a Site Plan for the construction of a residential community on Parcel 129.25-1-1, located directly behind the Reckson Executive Park on King Street. The development will include 100 attached and detached market rate dwellings, 10 affordable housing units as well as a pool, club house, streets, on-street parking areas, communal open space and storm water retention areas. On July 28, 2015, the Board of Trustees adopted a Negative Declaration for the proposed action which included certain amendments to Zoning Code, rezoning the property from OB-1 to the PUD Zoning District, approval of a PUD Concept Plan and PUD Site Plan, as well as all related approvals and permits, such as a Steep Slopes permit and any necessary Wetland Permit approval or extension. The Negative Declaration which culminated the BOT's SEQRA review included a full and comprehensive review of potential impacts such as traffic, storm water, wetlands, steep slopes, wildlife, tree removal, community character and other relevant categories of potential environmental impact. At the same meeting, the Board of Trustees adopted a local law which made certain text amendments to Section 250-7E of the Village Zoning Code concerning PUD developments, including authorization for the Board of Trustees to waive the floor area limitation for residential developments and to waive certain buffer area requirements. On August 18, 2015, the Board of Trustees re-zoned to the PUD Zoning District and approved a PUD Concept Plan. Thereafter, on or about September 17, 2015 the Applicant submitted its PUD Site Plan application to the Board of Trustees which was referred to the Planning Board on October 2, 2015 for consideration and for a report and recommendation. On November 5 24, 2015,the Board of Trustees referred to the Planning Board the Applicant's request for an extension of its existing Wetland Permit Approval. The Planning Board reviewed the PUD Site Plan application at its meetings on October 8, 2015, November 12, 2015, December 10, 2015, and January 14, 2016 and reviewed the Wetland Permit extension request at its December 10, 2015 meeting. DISCUSSION The following topics are those which the Planning Board primarily focused discussion upon: Density/Floor Area Waiver The approved PUD Concept Plan permits up to 110 residential units in the general configuration shown on the Concept Plan. The number of units proposed by the Applicant translates to a density of approximately 3.6 units per acre which is consistent with the neighboring development of Bellefair (1.9 units per acre), the Arbors (6.8 units per acre) and Doral Greens (7.9 units per acre). The proposed units per acre also falls under the maximum of 6 units per acre permitted with a PUD, as per the Village Code. The Applicant is proposing a total floor area which exceeds the 9,000 square-foot floor area per acre limitation set forth in the Village's PUD requirements. Specifically, the PUD Site Plan proposes 12,109 square feet of floor area per acre. Therefore, the Applicant is requesting a 3,109 square foot waiver which is a 35% increase over the allowable floor area. On July 28, 2015 the Board of Trustees adopted a local law which amended Section 250-7.E(3) of the Zoning Code to allow the Board of Trustees to waive the 9,000 square foot/acre floor area limitation applicable to PUDs, in whole or in part, if an 6 applicant provides affordable housing units equivalent to 10% of the proposed market rate units. This amendment to the Zoning Code applies to this PUD and any future proposed PUDs within the Village. It is the Planning Boards understanding that the Zoning Code amendment does not state an applicant is entitled to a floor area waiver if the requisite number of affordable housing units is provided, but only that an applicant is eligible for a waiver. It should be noted that the PUD Site Plan must contain at least 10 affordable housing units based on the schedule set forth at Section 209-3.F. Here, the Applicant is providing 10 affordable housing units which is equivalent to 10% of the 100 market rate units. Thus,the Applicant is eligible for a floor area waiver. As justification for the waiver, the Applicant points to three grounds: (1) inclusion of affordable housing units which are significantly larger than the minimum size required; (2) attached garages; and (3) walk-out basements. The Planning Board does not agree that providing the required affordable housing units constitutes a valid justification for granting the waiver. Although the affordable units provide a benefit to the community, they are required by code and should not serve as the basis for a gross floor area waiver. Attached garages and walk-out basements are included in the Village's definition of Gross Floor Area. However, these features contribute positively to the design and layout of the residential community but they are included in the Villages definition of GFA and thus increase the overall GFA calculation. While it may have been possible for the Applicant to design the development without these features and comply with the floor area limitation, the inclusion of the additional floor area in the overall development does not create any adverse impacts as the property is capable of supporting the additional buildable area. Therefore, based only on the second and third ground referenced above, the Planning Board supports the requested floor area waiver. 7 Lighting Plan The revised Lighting Plan replaces the originally proposed bollard lighting with traditional lighting standards which provide more comprehensive street lighting. However, the Applicant requested consideration for eliminating some of the street lighting standards to provide more minimal lighting throughout the development, keeping only the lighting standards located along the proposed extension of International Drive at internal roadway intersections, and adjacent to visitor parking spaces. In determining whether to eliminate some of the proposed lighting standards, the Board of Trustees should consider the following factors: whether the level of lighting desired (i) promotes the avoidance of car accidents involving users of the vehicular roadways that are also used by pedestrians as walkways with special consideration to vulnerable groups, e.g. pedestrians, cyclists, the elderly, the disabled, and children; (ii) enhances the nighttime environment by eliminating or mitigating lateral glare and sky lighting; and (iii) promotes energy efficiency. Steep Slopes/Grading Based on the Grading Plan, the Applicant is proposing a balanced cut and fill. The Applicant is proposing to increase the amount of slopes on the property that exceed 35% by approximately 0.61 acres, increase the amount of 25%-25% slopes by approximately 0.3 acres, decrease the amount of 15%-25% slopes by approximately 0.84 acres and decrease the amount of 0%-15% slopes by approximately 0.08 acres. The disturbance to existing slopes and creation of new slopes shown on the Grading Plan has been minimized through the utilization of retaining walls, particularly between the property and the adjacent Bellefair residential development. 8 When implementing the Grading Plan, it will be important to ensure that limits of construction are established, temporary and permanent slope stabilization measures are employed, and existing vegetation in areas adjacent to grading work is protected so as to ensure survival post construction. Landscape Screening The Planning Board is concerned that the removal of existing vegetation and grading of the property may create visual impacts to neighboring properties within Doral Greens and Bellefair. To address this concern, the Applicant added a note to the landscape plan requiring all existing trees within certain buffer areas to be evaluated by a certified arborist for safety and survivability to determine whether they should remain. All healthy trees in these areas will be retained. To ensure the effectiveness of the buffer vegetation in screening the proposed development from adjacent properties, the note should be revised to state that where trees are removed from the buffer areas, additional trees shall be planted to eliminate gaps created in the existing vegetation resulting from the removal of dead, dying or diseased trees. Stormwater The S WPPP submitted by the Applicant has been reviewed by DRE and determined to be acceptable. The stormwater management plan has been designed such that discharge rates remain at less than 76% of the predevelopment rates and the project will achieve a 68% Runoff Reduction Volume (RRv) where 30% is required. The design of the Stormwater Management plan remains reliant upon the approved and partially 9 constructed detention basins at the rear of the property and also includes green infrastructure techniques such as porous pavement, vegetative swale, and tree planting. Water Flow/Pressure On October 9, 2015 Suez Water (formerly, United Water Westchester Incorporated) issued a "Willingness to Serve" letter in which Suez certifies it has the ability and willingness to serve the Sun Homes development. It states that "[Suez] has adequate pressure and volume to serve [Sun Homes] subject to the following: the fire flow data provided was noted by Sun Homes as requiring confirmation." In a subsequent email to the Applicant dated October 28, 2015, Suez stated the following: Please be aware that we are doing some further studies along Anderson Hill Road and will continue to study this area and that, in addition to normal maintenance activities, we may make some improvements such as water main replacements that will positively affect water service for our customers. [Suez] has a Long Term Water Main Replacement Program and we continuously review and update plans and studies so we can optimize the water system improvements we make throughout our system. To confirm that surrounding properties will not experience pressure or flow issues as a result of the added demand on the water system, DBE's November 3, 2015 memorandum requests fire flow data and its December 8, 2015 memorandum requests information regarding Suez's proposed improvements, some of which information must come from Suez. Specifically, DRE's December 8, 2015 memorandum states: [Suez] proposed improvements in support of this application must be detailed. A hydraulic analysis must be submitted demonstrating that surrounding properties will not experience pressure or flow issues as a result of the added demand on the system. We will gladly meet with the 10 water company to discuss our thoughts on how to evaluate existing vs. proposed conditions. DRE's January 13, 2016 letter further states: With regard to this issue, we met with Frank McGlynn of Suez to discuss field tests necessary to determine if the construction of the Sun Homes project would have an impact on the water suppled to Belle Fair. Hydrant(s) would be opened at Belle Fair to flow at the average peak rate. Pressure would be taken before, during and after the flow. This procedure would then be repeated with hydrant flow in the Executive Park at the peak rate expected in the Sun Homes Development at maximum build out. At Belle Fair hydrant flow would be measured along with pressure in their system. Mr. McGlynn would like the above requested procedure submitted to him so that he could calculate the cost to the water company for conducting the testing. That cost would have to be paid to the water company. These items remain outstanding and must be addressed by the Applicant. PUD Guidelines Although the Applicant has stated that no site modifications will be permitted and that such limitation will be stated in the Homeowner's Association documents, such limitation is not realistic over time. In the Village's experience, it is common for PUDs or the individual residents within a PUD to request permission for the construction of sheds, patios, decks, retaining walls, and other site modifications. According to the Applicant's consultant, an additional 11,000 square feet of impervious surface coverage could be added to the site and accommodated by the proposed stormwater management system. The Board of Trustees should consider 11 adopting a local law similar to that adopted for the Arbors PUD to define the process and review standards for any increase in impervious surface coverage, or include in any approval resolution appropriate conditions for establishing such parameters. Reckson Phase 1 and Phase 2 As noted in the December 7, 2015 memorandum from Michael J. Izzo, Building and Fire Inspector, as well as the January 8, 2016 memorandum from F.P. Clark Associates, the PUD Site Plan is contingent upon certain revisions to the approved Reckson Phase 1 and Phase 2 Site Plans, subject to review by the Building Inspector, including the following: The Phase 1 and Phase 2 Site Plan shows International Drive with two traffic lanes in each direction. The PUD Site Plan shows the extension of International Drive (including the portion within Phase 1 and Phase 2) as containing only one traffic lane in each direction. Although the footprint for International Drive remains the same, the reconfiguration of the traffic lanes on Phase 1 and Phase 2 may require review and approval of an amended site plan for those parcels. According to the 12/7/15 memorandum from Mr. Izzo, two stone pillars located along King Street at the north end of the Phase 1/Phase 2 frontage must be relocated or removed to provide a minimum 20-foot clearance to serve as an unobstructed fire apparatus access road. Such revision may require an amendment to the approved Phase 1/Phase 1 site plan(s). Relocation of the existing trash enclosure and maintenance yard for Phase 1/Phase 2 may require an amendment of the approved Phase 1/Phase 2 site plan(s). Such amenities are currently in the same location as the proposed interior emergency access road and AFFH units. The Planning Board recommends that any approval of the PUD Site Plan should be conditioned upon the submittal of an application for an Amended Site Plan for Reckson Phase 1 and Phase 2 to accommodate these and any additional overall site changes that are precipitated by the proposed PUD Site Plan. 12 RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the foregoing, the Planning Board hereby recommends that the Board of Trustees approve the PUD Site Plan Application, including the requested floor area waiver, provided the following items are satisfactorily addressed by the Applicant: Demonstrate that surrounding properties will not experience pressure or flow issues as a result of the added demand on the water system. The Planning Board recommends the pressure tests referenced in DRE's January 13, 2016 memorandum should be performed prior to any approval of the PUD Site Plan. Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit, all outstanding comments of the Emergency Services Task Force in its December 7, 2016 memorandum shall be satisfied. Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit, submit a maintenance agreement for stormwater management facilities, including rain gardens and permeable pavers, for review of the Village Attorney as to form. Such agreement shall be recorded in the Westchester County Clerk's Office and proof of recording shall be submitted prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit, the approved site plan(s) for Reckson Phase 1 and Phase 2 shall be modified as necessary to accommodate aspects of the PUD Site Plan, including fire access, changes to International Drive, and relocation of the existing trash enclosure and maintenance yard at the rear of the existing parking area. Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit, the note on the Landscape Plan should be revised to state that where trees are removed from the buffer areas, additional trees shall be planted to eliminate gaps created in the existing vegetation resulting from the removal of dead, dying or diseased trees. 13 Introduce a proposed Local Law (similar to that established for the Arbors development) or establish conditions that define the procedural and substantive standards for subsequent increases in impervious surface coverage within the PUD Site Plan up to a maximum of 11,000 square feet of impervious surface coverage beyond that shown on the PUD Site Plan. Discussion Chairman Goodman stated that this Board cannot resolve all the issues involved in an application such as this, but that it can address the larger ones. He then asked for comments from the Board. Mr. Grzan welcomed Mr. Goodman as Chairperson. He is in favor of this project, believes the quality of construction, creative design and affordable housing units are all good for the Village. He does however have a few concerns such as the size of the homes and the number of units. He knows the applicant has asked for a waiver for the gross floor area allowed per acre, but strongly believes that the number of proposed units is excessive. Chairman Goodman introduced David Heiser who is a member of the Board of Trustees and the liaison to the Planning Board. He believes that streaming video and Trustee Heiser's presence will help him bring some of the Planning Board's concerns back to the Board of Trustees. Mrs. Schoen added that in substance she agrees with Mr. Grzan but has concerns about the stand alone affordable units which she raised in the beginning of the process. She is not sure the project should be sacrificed for that reason, and agrees that the applicant has done an extraordinary job with the design of the project. She supports the report and recommendation on most of the issues. Mr. Richman is in support of the report as it stands. Mr. Tartaglia would like to echo Mr. Grzan and Mrs. Schoen's comments about how the affordable units are separated from the rest of the development, but would hate to see anything create an impediment to affordable housing units in the northern section of the Village. He feels the project is more than he would like to see, but he too is impressed with the developers and believes the proposed project is well done and it will be an asset to the community. He has no objection to including concerns in the report but would hate to see the project derailed. Mr. Accurso is in support of the application but is on record that the site will be overbuilt. There are too many units on the site. He believes the 35% increase in allowable floor area per acre is excessive and believes, if the waiver is granted, it will serve as a precedent. 14 Chairman Goodman believes the inclusion of affordable housing in the project triggers the applicant's right to ask for the waiver. The point has been made about the board's concerns about the size of the units and that the site could be overbuilt. Chairman Goodman added that the jurisdiction over whether the waiver is granted rests with the Board of Trustees. His view is that this is a very good project and it contributes to the community in many ways. He understands that the waiver is not insignificant, but he, personally, likes the idea of larger units and believes this is a quality development. Ms. Gray asked Mr. Null with respect to steep slopes and grading how much fill was being imported into the site to which he responded that it is balanced cut and fill. No fill would be trucked in. Ms. Gray will revise the report to accurately report that. Mr. Accurso asked about the fact that 3 Board members want the affordable units dispersed throughout the site and that prospect that granting of the waiver would serve as a precedent for future developments Chairman Goodman responded that the Board of Trustees has discretion to waive the GFA per acre and that it would not be bound by precedent to grant a waiver in connection with another project. On a motion made by Mrs. Schoen and seconded by Mr. Grzan, the report was approved when Mr. Nowak called the roll: MR. ACCURSO NO MR. GRZAN YES MR. MORLINO YES MR. RICHMAN YES MRS. SCHOEN YES MR. TARTAGLIA YES CHAIRMAN GOODMAN YES Jennifer Gray, Esq. read the resolution referring the report to the Board of Trustees: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SUBMISSION OF A REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE RYE BROOK BOARD OF TRUSTEES ON AN APPLICATION BY SUN HOMES FOR APPROVAL OF A PUD SITE PLAN FOR A RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY OF 110 SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1100 KING STREET BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rye Brook Planning Board hereby submits the attached Report and Recommendation to the Rye Brook Board of Trustees on an application by Sun Homes for approval of a PUD Site Plan for a residential community of 110 single-family dwelling units on real property located at 1100 King Street. 15 On referring the report to the Board of Trustees, on a motion made by Mrs. Schoen and seconded by Mr. Tartaglia, the resolution was approved when Mr. Nowak called the roll: MR. ACCURSO NO MR. GRZAN YES MR. MORLINO YES MR. RICHMAN YES MRS. SCHOEN YES MR. TARTAGLIA YES CHAIRMAN GOODMAN YES Chairman Goodman added that the site plan for this application has been referred to the Board of Trustees; however, the Planning Board has jurisdiction over the steep slopes permit and asked for comments from the public. As there were none, Chairman Goodman called for a motion to continue the Public Hearing to the March meeting. On a motion made by Mr. Tartaglia and seconded by Mr. Richman, the Public Hearing was continued when Mr. Nowak called the roll: MR. ACCURSO YES MR. GRZAN YES MR. MORLINO YES MR. RICHMAN YES MRS. SCHOEN YES MR. TARTAGLIA YES CHAIRMAN GOODMAN YES • Review of a FAH Rezoning Petition, Subdivision and Lot 1 Site Plan Application for construction of two multi-family affordable dwellings on proposed Lot 1 (BOT Referral), Site Plan Applications for proposed Lots 2 and 3 to be improved with one market rate single family dwelling on each lot, and Wetland and Steep Slopes Permit Applications, for property located at 259 North Ridge Street, Rye Brook NY Parcel I.D. 135.35-1-11 Mr. Clark Neuringer, Architect for Mr. Larizza, addressed the Board. He gave a broad overview of the project noting the challenging site. He stated that the Board of Trustees asked if something could be done on this particular site and that they approached Mr. Larizza. He added that all of the affordable housing prior to this project is in the Port Chester School District, but this development would be in the Blind Brook School District. This site is on North Ridge Street and is slightly under 4 acres. Two of the proposed homes will be single-family freestanding buildings and the 8 affordable units will be 16 attached townhouses located in two buildings. Each of the town homes would be 1250 sf with two bedrooms and walk out basement. One of the single family homes will be 2500 sf and the other will be 3200 sf. Each townhouse building would be 5000 sf, which is similar to some of the homes in Rye Brook. This application is a series of 4 applications and a rezoning petition, a subdivision, and 3 site plan applications. There are difficulties with the site which includes steep slopes and wetlands. Mr. Mastromonaco will present a plan that fully meets the requirements of Rye Brook and their consultants. He showed a drawing of what the site would look like pointing out that there is minimal impact to the existing street. He showed initial renderings of what they are proposing,to keep the project in harmony with the surrounding area. Mr. Grzan asked how there could be no significant impact to the road. He is very concerned about additional traffic on Ridge Street, especially at the curve in the road that is already a concern. Mr. Goodman noted that as a matter of procedure there are no decisions being made tonight—we have been asked by the Board of Trustees to make recommendations on the lots. He added that the Village has received and read email comments and memos from residents in the area of this proposed project. There will be a Public Hearing and the public will have an opportunity to speak. Mr. Neuringer responded to Mr. Grzan that the applicant is aware of the roadway concerns and has designed the driveway and entranceway to be safe. Mrs. Timpone-Mohamed addressed the Board stating that her office reviewed the application and agreed that it is a complicated application because of overlapping jurisdiction as between the Board and the BOT. There will be a SEQRA review and it will look at all the potential impacts caused by this subdivision. Mr. Tartaglia asked who the lead agency is for this application,to which Mrs. Timpone- Mohamed responded that the Board of Trustees would likely to be lead agency, although the notice has not gone out yet. The Planning Board is an involved agency based on the steep slopes and wetlands permit applications, and the site plans for the two single family homes. Ms. Gray added that the lead agency has to determine if enough information has been provided to make a positive or negative declaration. The tasks currently before the Planning Board are site plan review on the two proposed individual, single family lots and advisory planning review on the remaining portions of the application for recommendation to the Board of Trustees. Mrs. Timpone-Mohamed continued her review of the application, and when she was finished M. Goodman advised the applicant to address the issues that remain open so that the next time the matter comes before the Board it will be looking at a completed application. 17 Mr. Morlino asked if Ridge Street was still a county road to which Mrs. Mohamed responded that it was, and County DOT would have to approve the curb cuts. Mr. Grzan asked if the project could be reviewed simultaneously by both Boards as he would prefer it be done that way. Ms. Gray responded that there are certain aspects of the proposal that the Board of Trustees must act upon before the Planning Board can take final action. For example, subdivision approval must precede any approval by the Planning Board on the two single family home lots. Mr. Tartaglia suggested the Board of Trustees vote on rezoning before this applicant moves forward with anything else. After some discussion, Ms. Gray stated that a procedural path for the application had already been set, but if the Applicant wants to explore the pursuit of an alternative path the Applicant should submit that request in writing to the Village. Trustee Heiser addressed the Board and stated that there was a misrepresentation made by the applicant that he would like to clarify. Several years ago the Board of Trustees wrote a position paper on affordable housing—at no point in time did the Board of Trustees approach the applicant. Mr. Lou Larizza, Developer, apologized to anyone that thought that he misrepresented himself. He wants to do what is right for the municipality— if the Village does not want this—he won't do it. Chairman Goodman advised the applicant to work with the Village staff and consultants to address the remaining issued brought up by Mrs. Mohamed. Mr. Nueringer apologized for his choice of words. The matter was adadjourned to the February 11 meeting. PUBLIC HEARING • Review of a Site Plan Application by John and Tonia Annunziata,to construct additions to the existing single-family dwelling for the property located at 5 Argyle Road, Rye Brook NY,Parcel I.D. 135.51-1-50 There was a preliminary issue relating to the public notification signage. As this is a corner lot both frontages require a public notification sign. The applicant had only one sign up, which does not comply. The applicant installed the second sign but did not do so within the time period required by the Code. The Board must decide whether or not to waive the requirement of the second sign so this application can be heard tonight. 18 Mr. Grzan makes a motion to waive, seconded by Mrs. Schoen, and approved by unanimous voice vote of the Board. Ona motion made by Mrs. Schoen and seconded by Mr. Grzan, the Public Hearing was opened when Mr. Nowak called the roll: MR. ACCURSO YES MR. GRZAN YES MR. MORLINO YES MR. RICHMAN YES MRS. SCHOEN YES MR. TARTAGLIA YES CHAIRMAN GOODMAN YES Mr. Mustacato addressed the Board stating that he believes they have reviewed and covered everything at the previous meeting and they have nothing to add at this time. Mrs. Timpone-Mohamed added the plan requires variances but the variances are minimal. The area to be expanded is away from the scenic road and there is mature vegetation along the scenic road to partially screen views. The other variances are related to the rear yard which is already non-conforming, and the addition increases the non- conformity. However, it is in an area where the property next door has their driveway so there would be minimal impacts. The application must go before the Zoning Board to request the needed variances. If the Board moves to approve the application tonight,the approval will be conditioned on the ZBA approval of the variances required. As there were no further comments or questions, Mr. Grzan made a motion to close the Public Hearing and on a second made by Mrs. Schoen,the hearing was closed when Mr. Nowak called the roll: MR. ACCURSO YES MR. GRZAN YES MR. MORLINO YES MR. RICHMAN YES MRS. SCHOEN YES MR. TARTAGLIA YES CHAIRMAN GOODMAN YES Ms. Gray read the resolution: RESOLUTION CONSIDERING A SITE PLAN APPLICATION FOR CONSTRUCTION OF AN ADDITION ON AN EXISTING RESIDENCE AT 5 ARGYLE ROAD 19 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK PLANNING BOARD WHEREAS, John and Tonia Annunziata, property owners, submitted an Application for Site Plan approval to construct a side addition, including a rear patio, relocated driveway and extended front patio, at 5 Argyle Road in the R-10 zoning district and the Scenic Roads Overlay District, said premises being further identified as Section 135.51, Block 1, Lot 50 on the Town of Rye Tax Assessor's Map; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board reviewed the following plans and application materials in connection with the Application: 1. Short Environmental Assessment Form 2. Building Permit Check List and Zoning Analysis 3. Exterior Building Permit Application 4. Application for Site Plan Approval and Submittal Checklist 5. Property Survey, prepared by Richard A. Spinelli, Mamaroneck, N.Y. dated July 17, 2015 6. Waiver Request Letter from RMG Associates, Rye,N.Y. to the Rye Brook Village Engineer dated November 5, 2015 7. Architect's Plans, prepared by RMG Associates, Rye,N.Y.: U Sheet NumberU USheet InformationU Dated A-1 Location Map/Notes/Zoning Calculations 10/27/15 A-2 Site Plan/Tree Protection/Details 10/27/15 A-3 Front Elevation/Height Setback Calculations 10/27/15 A-4 Right and Rear Elevations 10/27/15 A-5 Existing First Floor Plan 10/27/15 A-6 Proposed First Floor Plan 10/27/15; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board reviewed a memorandum from the Village Planning Consultant, F.P. Clark Associates, dated December 8, 2015, concerning the application; and WHEREAS, Village Code §250-22G(1) requires a minimum front yard setback of 30 feet and the Applicant proposes a front yard setback of 26.5 feet on the south elevation of the home fronting Argyle Road, requiring a front yard setback variance of 3.5 feet; and WHEREAS, Village Code §250-22G(3) requires a minimum rear yard setback of 30 feet and the Applicant proposes a rear yard setback of 10.2 feet, requiring a rear yard setback variance of 19.8 feet; and WHEREAS, Village Code §250-37B requires a maximum main building coverage of 20% and the Applicant proposes a main building coverage of 21.5%, requiring a main building coverage variance of 1.5%; and 20 WHEREAS, on December 10, 2015 the Planning Board referred the application to the Zoning Board of Appeals for consideration of the above-referenced variances, including any additional variances determined by the Building Inspector to be necessary; and WHEREAS, a duly advertised public hearing was held on January 14, 2016, at which time all those wishing to be heard on the Application were given such opportunity, and the public hearing was closed on January 14, 2015; and WHEREAS, the Proposed Action is a Type II Action pursuant to the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA), and accordingly, no further environmental review is required; and WHEREAS, the Village Planning Consultant, Village staff and the Planning Board have reviewed the information and submitted comments regarding the Application. NOW THEREFORE BE, IT RESOLVED, that upon recommendation of the Village of Rye Brook Superintendent of Public Works/Village Engineer, the Village of Rye Brook Planning Board hereby approves the waiver requested by the applicant for the submission of a current topographic survey and lighting plan. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Village of Rye Brook Planning Board hereby approves the Application for Site Plan approval to construct a side addition, including a rear patio, relocated driveway and extended front patio, at 5 Argyle Road, subject to the following conditions: 1. Approval by the Zoning Board of Appeals of the above-referenced variances. If during the Zoning Board of Appeals' review of the variance application minor modifications are made to the Site Plan intended to reduce, eliminate or mitigate the requested variances, the Applicant is not required to return to the Planning Board for approval of such minor modifications. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that no permits shall be issued until the Applicant has paid to the Village all applicable fees and professional review fees incurred in connection with review of this Application. On a motion made by Mr. Grzan and seconded by Mr. Tartaglia, the resolution was approved when Mr. Nowak called the roll: MR. ACCURSO YES MR. GRZAN YES MR. MORLINO YES MR. RICHMAN YES MRS. SCHOEN YES MR. TARTAGLIA YES CHAIRMAN GOODMAN YES 21 CONTINUED BUSINESS • Review of a Site Plan and Wetland Permit Application by 3 Edgewood Drive LLC, to tear down and construct a single-family dwelling on the property located at 3 Edgewood Drive, Rye Brook NY, Parcel I.D. 135.36-1-31 • Application has been adjourned to the February 11, 2016 meeting Adjourned at request of the applicant. NEW BUSINESS • Review of a Site Plan& Steep Slopes Applications by Wilfred Rohde P.E. on behalf of Douglas and Lisa Levine, to legalize work performed without a permit including regrading and constructing retaining walls at the property located at 34 Bellefair Road, Rye Brook NY,Parcel I.D. 124.73-1-63 Wilford Rohde, PE, addressed the Board and gave an overview of the project. Mrs. Timpone-Mohamed stated that the site plan will require a steep slopes work permit and will be required to comply with the Village Code regarding steep slopes. Both existing walls will be removed. Removal of one of the walls will require some restoration work on the adjacent property. Mrs. Schoen asked if the other property owner has to come before us. Mrs. Mohamed responded no, because the amount of grading would be below 400 square feet. Mrs. Gray added that a temporary easement will be required on the adjacent property to do the work. There was a brief continued discussion regarding the stability of the wall and the deer fence. It was decided that the wall stability is not an issue, and the status of the deer fence would have to be taken up with the HOA. Mrs. Gray read the resolution: RESOLUTION SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING CONCERNING AN APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF A SITE PLAN AND STEEP SLOPES WORK PERMIT FOR 34 BELLEFAIR ROAD VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK PLANNING BOARD 22 WHEREAS, Douglas and Lisa Levine, submitted an application for approval of a site plan and a Steep Slopes Work Permit to regrade property and construct retaining walls at 34 Bellefair Road in a PUD zoning district, said premises being further identified as Section 124.73, Block 1, Lot 63 on the Town of Rye Tax Assessor's Map. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Village of Rye Brook Planning Board shall hold a Public Hearing on February 11, 2016 at 7:30 p.m., at Village Hall, 938 King Street, Rye Brook,New York to consider the application for approval of a site plan and Steep Slopes Work Permit; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Planning Board, pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) determines the Proposed Action to be a Type 2 Action requiring no further review pursuant to the requirements of SEQRA; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Applicant is directed to comply with Section 250-40 of the Village Code regarding notification. On a motion made by Mrs. Schoen and seconded by Mr. Morlino,the resolution was approved and Mr. Nowak called the roll: MR. ACCURSO YES MR. GRZAN YES MR. MORLINO YES MR. RICHMAN YES MRS. SCHOEN YES MR. TARTAGLIA YES CHAIRMAN GOODMAN YES Chairman Goodman asked the Board to give thought regarding the minutes and applications and how to streamline things. The level of detail currently in the minutes is high and he would like to see it streamlined. Mrs. Schoen added that minutes should be what was done and not what was said. Mr. Tartaglia believes that if the applicant feels like they need stenographic minutes,they are welcome to do provide that for themselves. Chairman Goodman will add this to next month's agenda for discussion. Mr. Grzan made a motion to adjourn and on a second made by Mrs. Schoen, the meeting was adjourned at 10:34 p.m. by unanimous voice vote. 23 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK PLANNING BOARD VILLAGE HALL, 938 KING STREET Thursday, March 10, 2016 - 7:30 p.m. MINUTES 1. Review of minutes—November 2015, January 2016, February 2016 AFFORDABLE HOUSING 2. Review of a FAH Rezoning Petition, Subdivision and Lot 1 Site Plan Application for construction of two multi-family affordable dwellings on proposed Lot 1 (BOT Referral), Site Plan Applications for proposed Lots 2 and 3 to be improved with one market rate single family dwelling on each lot, and Wetland and Steep Slopes Permit Applications, for the property located at 259 North Ridge Street, Rye Brook NY Parcel I.D. 135.35-1-11 Applicant requests an Adjournment PUBLIC HEARING 3. Review of an application for a Steep Slopes Per by SuKok omes to construct 110 units of housing, at 1100 King Street (International Drive), Rye NY. Parcel I.D. 129.25-1-1 4. Review of a Site Plan & Steep Slopes Applicat* y ed Rohde P.E. on behalf of Douglas and Lisa Levine, to legalize work perfor d hout permit including regrading and constructing retaining walls, for the property loc at 34 Bellefair Road, Rye Brook NY, Parcel I.D. 124.73-1-63 5. Review of a Site Plan Applicatwm Avenue Realty Corp./Sarah-Anne Trayner, to add a standby generator and a sl'('Ave bule, the property located at 66 Bowman Avenue, Rye Brook NY, Parcel I.D. 141.27-1-2 CONTINUED BUSINESS 6. Review of a Site Plan and Permit Application by 3 Edgewood Drive LLC, to tear down and construct a single-family elling for the property located at 3 Edgewood Drive, Rye Brook NY, Parcel I.D. 135.36-1-31 Applicant requests an Adjoumment NEW BUSINESS 7. Review of a Sketch Plan Application by Stanley Rothman for a (3) three lot subdivision, for the property located at 2 Elm Hill, Rye Brook NY, Parcel I.D. 135.51-1-1 LOCAL LAW CONSIDERATION ACTION ON NON-AGENDA MATTERS PRESENT BOARD Dominick Accurso, Jr. John Grzan Jeffrey Richman Amy Schoen Dan Tartaglia Chairman Rob Goodman EXCUSED Sal Morlino STAFF Mrs. Jennifer Gray, Village Counsel Mrs. Marilyn Timpone-Mohamed, Village Planning Consultant Mr. Mike Nowak, Jr., Village Engineer/Superintendent of Public Works Ms. Shari Melillo, Planning Board Secretary Chairman Goodman asked everyone to join him in the P of Allegiance, introduced the Planning Board and staff and explained the rules of procedure fo me Chairman Goodman called for the first item on the agenda. MINUTES 1. Review of minutes—November Janua 016, February 2016 The consensus of the Board is th a a pier with the shorter minutes and would prefer to have it done that way moving fo d. 44 On a motion made by Mrs. Schoe seconded by Mr. Grzan, the minutes for February 2016 were approved when Mr. Nowak called e roll: MR. ACCURSO YES MR. GRZAN YES MR. MORLINO ABSENT MR. RICHMAN YES MRS. SCHOEN YES MR. TARTAGLIA YES CHAIRMAN GOODMAN YES The Board has not completed their minutes review for January 2016 and November 2015 as of yet so they will be advanced to the April meeting. AFFORDABLE HOUSING 2. Review of a FAH Rezoning Petition, Subdivision and Lot 1 Site Plan Application for construction of two multi-family buildings with a total of 8 affordable dwelling units on proposed Lot 1 (BOT Referral), Site Plan Applications for proposed Lots 2 and 3 to be improved with one market rate Page 2 of 19 single family dwelling on each lot, and Wetland and Steep Slopes Permit Applications for the property located at 259 North Ridge Street,Rye Brook,NY, Parcel I.D. 135.35-1-11 The application was adjourned to April 14, 2016 at the request of the applicant. PUBLIC HEARING 3. Review of an application for a Steep Slopes Permit by Sun Homes to construct 110 units of housing, at 1100 King Street (International Drive), Rye Brook NY. Parcel I.D. 129.25-1-1 Mr. William Null of Cuddy and Feder addressed the Board on behalf of the applicant. He explained that this plan is identical to the PUD site plan approved by the Board of Trustees earlier this month. It is being reviewed for approval of a steep slopes work permit. Chairman Goodman asked the applicant to address the transport of the fill required, their phasing plan and how they would minimize disturbance of the site. Mr. Jerry Schwalbe addressed the Board on behalf of the applicant. He explained that the previous application for an office building on this site had a similar a unt of disturbance. The Village's main concern is with the phasing because it could take time, aper ately 4 years, but the Applicant will limit the disturbance to 5 acres at a time. He reviewed t Mug plan and advised the Board that a more detailed outline of the phasing was submitted t Villa Mrs. Timpone-Mohamed, Village Planning Consult was asked for any comments or concerns she might have. Her concern with the projectpha s the tion of temporary steep slopes that may change as they start each new phase, and the st of the temporary slopes that may exist for years. She suggested they may be con^s tha he oard may want to include in the resolution regarding slope stabilization and ph The applicant is required by t Y C pen no more than 5 acres of ground at any time. In addition, temporary storm mans ment must be provided during each phase until the permanent storm water manage t p is put in place. Mrs. Schoen asked how the applicant was addressing her concerns about increased traffic on King Street during construction as workers, equipment and transport trucks come and go. Mr. Schwalbe responded that the larger vehicles will more than likely be coming from the North from 684. There will be a pre-construction meeting with Village staff to finalize construction logistics such as traffic management prior to the start of construction. Work to complete the storm water detention basins and the need to amend the Phase 1 and Phase 2 site plans to accommodate the proposed extension of International Drive were also discussed. There being no further comments from the public or the Board, a motion to close the Public Hearing was made by Mr. Grzan and seconded by Mr. Tartaglia. Mr. Nowak called the roll: MR. ACCURSO YES MR. GRZAN YES MR. MORLINO ABSENT MR. RICHMAN YES MRS. SCHOEN YES Page 3 of 19 MR. TARTAGLIA YES CHAIRMAN GOODMAN YES Mrs. Jennifer Gray read the resolution which can be found at the end of this document. On a motion made by Mrs. Schoen and seconded by Mr. Richman, the resolution was approved when Mr. Nowak called the roll: MR. ACCURSO NO MR. GRZAN YES MR. MORLINO ABSENT MR. RICHMAN YES MRS. SCHOEN YES MR. TARTAGLIA YES CHAIRMAN GOODMAN YES 4. Review of a Site Plan & Steep Slopes Application b ilfred Rohde P.E. on behalf of Douglas and Lisa Levine, to legalize work performed ith a permit including re-grading and constructing retaining walls, for the property to e at 34 fair Road, Rye Brook,NY, Parcel I.D. 124.73-1-63 On a motion made by Mrs. Schoen and seco OkYartaglia, the Public Hearing was opened when Mr. Nowak called the roll: MR. ACCURSO Y MR. GRZAN MR. MORLINO AB MR. RICHMAN YES MRS. SCHOEN MR. TARTAGLIA Y S CHAIRMAN GOODMAN YES Mr. Rohde, engineer for the applicant addressed the Board and gave a brief overview of the project. The family would like a usable, safe backyard for the family. The plan proposed lowering the grade of the yard, removing an existing retaining wall and building a new retaining wall. In addition, the back steps leading from the house would be changed to make them more stable. All work is in the back yard except for the north side of the stairs where a repair and replanting will take place. The existing wall that encroaches into the 15 foot wide utility easement will be removed. The new retaining wall will not be located in the easement. Mrs. Timpone-Mohamed added that she reviewed the revised planting plan. The two invasive species in the plan were removed. There being no further comments or questions, on a motion made by Mrs. Schoen and seconded by Mr. Tartaglia, the public hearing was closed when Mr. Nowak called the roll: Page 4 of 19 MR. ACCURSO YES MR. GRZAN YES MR. MORLINO ABSENT MR. RICHMAN YES MRS. SCHOEN YES MR. TARTAGLIA YES CHAIRMAN GOODMAN YES Mrs. Gray read the resolution which can be found at the end of this document. On a motion made by Mrs. Schoen and seconded by Mr. Grzan, the resolution was approved when Mr. Nowak called the roll: MR. ACCURSO YES MR. GRZAN YES MR. MORLINO ABSENT MR. RICHMAN YES MRS. SCHOEN YES MR. TARTAGLIA YES CHAIRMAN GOODMAN YES 5. Review of a Site Plan Application by 66 owma venue Realty Corp./Sarah-Anne Trayner, to add a standby generator and a side vestib the perty located at 66 Bowman Avenue, Rye Brook,NY, Parcel I.D. 141.27-1-24 On a motion made by Mr. Grzan and se o e y M . Richman, the public hearing was opened when Mr. Nowak called the roll: MR. ACCURSO YES MR. GRZAN MR. MORLINO SENT MR. RICHMAN YES MRS. SCHOEN YES MR. TARTAGLIA YES CHAIRMAN GOODMAN YES Mr. Louis Contadino addressed the Board on behalf of the applicant and gave a brief overview of the proposed plan which is to install a 1000-gallon underground propane tank, a backup generator, and a new vestibule for the side entrance to the building. The applicant requested a waiver of the required topographic survey. The granting of the waiver was recommended by Mr. Nowak. Mrs. Timpone-Mohamed added that the revised landscape plan was reviewed and all her comments have been satisfied. There being no further comments or questions, on a motion made by Mr. Grzan and seconded by Mrs. Schoen, the public hearing was closed when Mr. Nowak called the roll: Page 5 of 19 MR. ACCURSO YES MR. GRZAN YES MR. MORLINO ABSENT MR. RICHMAN YES MRS. SCHOEN YES MR. TARTAGLIA YES CHAIRMAN GOODMAN YES Mrs. Gray read the resolution which can be found at the end of this document. On a motion made by Mrs. Schoen and seconded by Mr. Richman, the resolution was approved when Mr. Nowak called the roll: MR. ACCURSO YES MR. GRZAN YES MR. MORLINO ABSENT MR. RICHMAN YES MRS. SCHOEN YES MR. TARTAGLIA YES CHAIRMAN GOODMAN YES 8. Review of Site Plan and Wetla ications by 3 Edgewood Drive LLC, to tear down and construct a single-fami 1� n t e property located at 3 Edgewood Drive, Rye Brook, NY, Parcel I.D. 135.36- 1 The application was adjourned to 14, 2016 at the request of the applicant. NEW BUSINESS 9. Review of a Sketch Plan submitted by Stanley Rothman for a (3) three lot subdivision of the property located at 2 Elm Hill Drive, Rye Brook,NY, Parcel I.D. 135.51-1-1 Mr. Mike Edelman and Mr. Eric Greenburgh, the future property owners, introduced themselves and Mr. Chris Scelfo, the Architect who will be representing them. Mr. Scelfo gave an overview of the project which includes demolition of the existing home, removal of the existing driveways, pool and walkways, and a proposed subdivision of the property into 3 conforming R-12 building lots. Mr. Grzan asked about the proposed lot boundaries that include one lot with an irregular perimeter creating a "tail" on the lot. The layout is similar to one of the lots of the two lot subdivision approved in 2009. However, the 2009 plat was never filed with the Westchester County Clerk's Office, so the approval has expired. The Applicant believes the tail is necessary for installation of the connection to the sewer main. Members of the Board commented that the tail should be removed from the lot. Mr. Scelfo advised the Board that the three new driveways are located to minimize the disturbance of steep slopes and a full grading plan will be submitted the subdivision and site plan applications. Storm Page 6of19 water management will be provided on each of the three lots. He also briefly discussed the landscape plan, tree removal and sewer lines. Mrs. Timpone-Mohamed addressed the Board regarding the lot with the "tail." She did not believe that the proposed new sewer line would require such a lot configuration as the line could be located in an easement or in the right of way. The sewer main extension and the connection to the lot on the 2009 plan were within the right of way. The formal application must include site plan applications for all three lots and a preliminary plat for the subdivision. Mr. Grzan would like the applicants to rethink the lot with the "tail." He was opposed to it the last time it was before the Planning Board and believes they have enough lot area without it. The Chairman suggested use of an easement. Mr. Tartaglia noted that a house on one of the lots would back up to Crawford Park and he would like to see a lot of vegetation planted to buffer views of the house from the park. He wants to see a rendering of the appearance of the developed lot when viewed from the park. Chairman Goodman mentioned receipt of an email from omeowner in the area of the subdivision that has comments and concerns. He read the email the ' utes and it can be found at the end of this document. Mr. Accurso also does not agree with the cr tion o of with a "tail," which he opposed when the 2009 plan was reviewed. As this is a new ap on, three lots should be conforming lots in all respects. There being no further comments, o m de by Mrs. Schoen and seconded by Mr. Grzan, the meeting was adjourned by una vo vote at 9:06 pm. Page 7 of 19 March 10, 2016 APPROVED 6-0— RESOLUTION CONSIDERING AN APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF A SITE PLAN AMENDMENT SUBMITTED BY 66 BOWMAN AVENUE REALTY CORP. FOR PROPERTY AT 66 BOWMAN AVENUE VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK PLANNING BOARD WHEREAS, 66 Bowman Avenue Realty Corp. (Sarah-Anne Traynor), property owner (the "Applicant"), submitted an application to amend the approved site plan to remove a walkway, construct a new walkway and entry vestibule addition, and install a permanent standby backup generator and underground propane tank on property located at 66 Bowman Avenue, designated as Section 141.27, Block 1, Lot 24 on the Town of Rye Tax Map and located in the -217 Zoning District; and WHEREAS,the Planning Board reviewed the to ing pl nd application materials: 1. Application for Site Plan Approval 2. Site Plan Submittal Checklist 3. Exterior Building Permit Applic 4. Application to Install a Perm t ackup Generator 5. Short Environmental Asse men rm d EAF Mapper Summary Report 6. Survey of Property, dat gust 3 0 5, revised February 2, 2016 prepared by Ward Carpenter Engineers, Inc., White Plain .Y 7. Architect's Plans, prepared by tadino Architects AIA, Cos Cob, C.T.: Sheet Number Sheet Title Dated SP Plans/Details Revised 2/19/16 A1.0 Plans/Details Revised 12/14/2015 A2.0 Elevations Revised 12/14/2015 CS No title Revised 12/14/2015 SK-1 Landscape Plan 2/9/16; and WHEREAS, in 2012 the Board of Trustees granted an amended special permit and site plan to permit use of the existing 2-story residential building as professional offices for a risk management business with up to 2 professional persons and up to 17 employees; and Page 8 of 19 WHEREAS, the Applicant is seeking an amendment of the approved site plan to remove a walkway, construct a new walkway and entry vestibule addition, and install a permanent standby backup generator and underground propane tank; and WHEREAS, based on the nature of the improvements the Planning Board is the Approval Authority for this application pursuant to Section 209-LA(2)(a) and (c)of the Village Code; and WHEREAS, on February 11, 2016 the Planning Board classified the application as a Type 2 Action pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) thereby requiring no further environmental review; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the New York State General Municipal Law and the Westchester County Administrative Code, the application was referred to Westchester County Department of Planning and notice of the public hearing was sent to the Village of Port Chester; and WHEREAS, a duly advertised public hearing was opened on March 10, 2016, at which time all those wishing to be heard on the Application were given suc portunity, and the public hearing was closed on March 10, 2016; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board, Village PI n nsul nt, and Village staff have reviewed all application materials, including public comme ts; an WHEREAS,the Planning Boar fu fame with the application and the Property. NOW THEREFORE T R OLVED, that upon recommendation of the Village of Rye Brook Superintendent of Public s illage Engineer, the Village of Rye Brook Planning Board hereby approves the waiver requeste y the applicant for the items listed in the site plan submission requirement checklist which were not submitted by the Applicant due to the limited nature of the proposed work. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Village of Rye Brook Planning Board hereby grants the application for an amendment to the approved Site Plan for property located at 66 Bowman Avenue. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that no permits shall be issued until the Applicant has paid to the Village all applicable fees and professional review fees incurred in connection with review of this Application. Page 9 of 19 On motion by Ms. Schoen, seconded by Mr. Grzan, Mr. Michel Nowak, Superintendent of Public Works, called the roll: Dominick Accurso, Jr. Voting YES John Grzan Voting YES Sal Morlino Voting Excused Jeffrey Richman Voting YES Amy Schoen Voting YES Daniel Tartaglia Voting YES Robert Goodman, Chairman Voting YES Page 10 of 19 March 10, 2016 APPROVED 5-1 RESOLUTION CONSIDERING AN APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF A STEEP SLOPES PERMIT SUBMITTED BY SUN HOMES FOR PROPERTY AT 1100 KING STREET (RECKSON) VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK PLANNING BOARD WHEREAS, Sun Homes (the "Applicant"), as authorized by property owner Reckson Operating Partnership L.P., submitted an application for a Steep Slopes Permit in connection with the proposed construction of a residential development of 110 single-family dwelling units on property located at 1100 King Street, designated as Section 129.25, Block 1, Lot 1 on the Town of Rye Tax Map and located in the Planned Unit Development D'� District; and WHEREAS, the Applicant is proposing to moderately steep slopes (15% to less than 25%) which will reduce the total area of mod 1 ste lopes from 3.82 acres to 2.98 acres and create an additional 0.92 acres of very steep an t y steep slopes (25% to less than 35%, and 35% and greater, respectively); and WHEREAS, the Plan Boar s the Approval Authority for this application pursuant to Chapter 213 of the Village Code; an WHEREAS, the Planning Board reviewed the following plans and application materials: 8. Full Environmental Assessment Form Part land EAF Mapper Summary 9. Application for Site Plan Approval 10. Letter to the Planning Board prepared by Divney, Tung, Schwalbe, LLP,White Plains, N.Y., dated December 23, 2015 11. Letter to the Planning Board prepared by Divney, Tung, Schwalbe, LLP,White Plains, N.Y., dated November 25, 2015 12. Letter to the Building and Fire Inspector prepared by Divney, Tung, Schwalbe , LLP,White Plains, N.Y., dated November 24, 2015 13. Letter to the Planning Board prepared by Cuddy and Feder, LLP,White Plains, N.Y. dated November 25, 2015 Page 11 of 19 14. Letter to the Mayor and Board of Trustees prepared by Cuddy and Feder, LLP,White Plains, N.Y. dated September 17, 2015 15. PUD Site Plan Project Description and Rendered Illustrative Home Plans and Elevations prepared by Divney, Tung, Schwalbe , LLP,White Plains, N.Y., no date 16. Stormwater Management Report prepared by Divney, Tung, Schwalbe , LLP,White Plains, N.Y., dated September 2015, Revised December 2015 17. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan prepared by Divney, Tung, Schwalbe , LLP,White Plains, N.Y., dated November 2015, Revised December 2015 18. Land Title Survey prepared by Joseph R. Link, Land Surveyor, Mahopac, N.Y. dated March 23, 2002, updated January 26, 2015 19. Letter to Divney, Tung, Schwalbe from NYSDEC Division of Fish, Wildlife and Marine Resources, New York State Natural Heritage Program,Albany, N. Y., dated February 25, 2015 20. Willingness to Serve Letter from United Water New York, dated October 9, 2015 21. Memorandum to the Village Engineer and the Planning Board prepared by Dolph Rotfeld Engineering , P.C., Tarrytown, N.Y. dated January 7, 2016 22. Memorandum to the Village Engineer and the Planning Board prepared by Dolph Rotfeld Engineering , P.C., Tarrytown, N.Y. dated November 3, 2015 23. Engineer's Plans, prepared by Divney, Tung, Schwalbe, L White Plains, N.Y.: Sheet Number Sheet Title Date No number Cover Sheet 9/17/15 rev. 12/23/15 SP-1.0 Overall Site Plan 9/17/15 rev. 12/23/15 SP-1.1 Site Layout an 9/17/15 rev. 12/23/15 SP-2.0 Grading an lity P n 9/17/15 rev. 12/23/15 SP-3.0 Site Utility Plan verall 9/17/15 rev. 12/23/15 SP-3.1 Typical Unit Plan 9/17/15 rev. 12/23/15 SP-4.0 Landscape Plan— Overall 9/17/15 rev. 12/23/15 SP-4.1 Landscape Plan— Typical Unit/Clubhouse 9/17/15 rev. 12/23/15 SP-5.0 Erosion and Sediment Control Plan 9/17/15 rev. 12/23/15 SP-5.1 Erosion and Sediment Control Details 9/17/15 rev. 12/23/15 SP-5.2 Phasing Plan 9/17/15 rev. 12/23/15 SP-6.0 Site Sections 9/17/15 rev. 12/23/15 SP-6.1 Road Profiles 9/17/15 rev. 12/23/15 Page 12 of 19 SP-6.2 Water Profiles 9/17/15 rev. 12/23/15 SP-6.3 Sanitary Sewer Profiles 9/17/15 rev. 12/23/15 SP-6.4 Storm Sewer Profiles 9/17/15 rev. 12/23/15 SP-7.1 to SP-7.3 Site Details 9/17/15 rev. 12/23/15 SP-8.0 Site Lighting Plan 9/17/15 rev. 12/23/15 L-02 Planting, Lighting and Wetland Mitigation Plan 5/25/07 rev. 11/23/15 F-1 Fire Protection Plan 11/18/15 SS-1.0 Slope Analysis 12/23/15; and WHEREAS, on July 28, 2015 the Board ofIzo'n s adopted a Negative Declaration pursuant to SEQRA for the Proposed Action which inrtain text amendments to the PUD zoning regulations in Chapter 250 of the Village Co t e Property from OB-1 to PUD, PUD Concept Plan and PUD Site Plan approvals, o per is and approvals, including a Steep Slopes Permit; and WHEREAS, on August 18, 2015 the Bo o stees rezoned the Property from OB-1 to PUD and approved a PUD Concept PI the comes development; and WHEREAS, on Februa 2 e Board of Trustees approved a PUD Site Plan submitted by Sun Homes f the co t tion of 110 single-family dwelling units and related amenities and improvements, su t to proval of Steep Slope Permit; and WHEREAS, a duly advertis d public hearing on the Steep Slopes Permit application was opened on December 10, 2015 and continued to January 14, 2016 and March 10, 2016, at which time all those wishing to be heard on the Application were given such opportunity, and the public hearing was closed on March 10, 2016; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board has considered the Steep Slopes Work Permit standards set forth at Village Code §213-6; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board, Village Planning Consultant, and Village staff have reviewed all application materials, including public comments; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board is fully familiar with the application and the Property. Page 13 of 19 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Village of Rye Brook Planning Board hereby grants the requested Steep Slopes Work Permit for property located at 1100 King Street, subject to the following condition: 1. During the development of the site, limits of construction shall be established and maintained, temporary and permanent slope stabilization measures shall be employed, and existing vegetation proposed to remain in areas adjacent to disturbed areas and slopes shall be protected during construction to ensure its survival post-construction. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that no permits shall be issued until the Applicant has paid to the Village all applicable fees and professional review fees incurred in connection with review of this Application. On motion by seconded by Mr. Michel Nowak, Superintendent of Public Works, called the roll: Dominick Accurso,Jr. Voting NO John Grzan Voting YES Sal Morlino Voting Exc Jeffrey Richman Voting Amy Schoen Voting Daniel Tartaglia Vo ' YES Robert Goodman, Chairman Vo Page 14 of 19 March 10, 2016 APPROVED 6-0 RESOLUTION CONSIDERING AN APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF A SITE PLAN AND STEEP SLOPES PERMIT SUBMITTED BY DOUGLAS AND LISA D. LEVINE FOR PROPERTY AT 34 BELLEFAIR ROAD VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK PLANNING BOARD WHEREAS, Douglas and Lisa D. Levine, submitted an application for approval of a Site Plan and Steep Slopes Work Permit to regrade property and construct retaining walls at 34 Bellefair Road in a Planned Unit Development (PUD) zoning district, said premises being further identified as Section 124.73, Block 1, Lot 63 on the Town of Rye Tax Assessor's Map; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board reviewed t fo wing s and application materials: 24. Short Environmental Assessment Form d ed ember 23, 2015 25. Exterior Building Permit Applic o 26. Site Plan Application and Chec 27. Letter to the Building De t rom,Rohde, Soyka and Andrews, Consulting Engineers, P.C., Poughkeepsie, N. dated Deceiber 22, 2015 28. Photographic survey of pr erty 29. Topographic Survey, prepare Ward Carpenter Engineers, Inc.,White Plains, N.Y. dated October 22, 2015 30. Wall Calculations prepared by Rohde, Soyka and Andrews, Consulting Engineers, P.C., Poughkeepsie, N.Y., dated January 20, 2016 31. Engineer's Plans, entitled "Revised Site Plan Application" prepared by Rohde, Soyka and Andrews, Consulting Engineers, P.C., Poughkeepsie, N.Y.: Sheet Number Sheet Title Dated C-1 Site Plan and Notes 9/15 rev. 2/8/16 C-2 Partial Site Plan and Details 9/15 rev. 2/8/16 C-3 Details— 1 9/15 rev. 2/8/16 C-4 Details—2 9/15 rev. 2/8/16; and Page 15 of 19 WHEREAS, the Planning Board is the Approval Authority for this application pursuant to Section 209-1.A(2)(a) and Chapter 213 of the Village Code; and WHEREAS, on February 11, 2016 the Planning Board classified the application as a Type 2 Action pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) thereby requiring no further environmental review; and WHEREAS, a duly advertised public hearing was opened on March 10, 2016, at which time all those wishing to be heard on the Application were given such opportunity, and the public hearing was closed on March 10, 2016; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board has considered the Steep Slopes Work Permit standards set forth at Village Code §213-6; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board, Village Plannin Consultant, and Village staff have reviewed all application materials, including public comme and WHEREAS, the Planning Board is full familia th the application and the Property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT R SO D, that the Village of Rye Brook Planning Board hereby approves a Site Plan and Steep Slopes Work Permit for property located at 34 Bellefair Road, subject to the following ndition 1. During construction, reasonable effort shall be made to minimize disturbance of the remaining vegetati and slopes in the rear yard. 2. This resolution shall not be construed to authorize the disturbance, alteration or removal of any trees, stone walls, retaining walls or other vegetation, landscaping or improvements located outside the boundary line of property located at 34 Bellefair Road. It is noted that implementation of the Site Plan would require work to be performed on property located at 32 Bellefair Road to remove an existing wall encroachment and perform grading activities. Authorization of work on such property is outside the scope of this Resolution as it does not meet the minimum threshold for a steep slopes permit or any other approval from the Planning Board. However, prior to the issuance of a Building Permit for work at 34 Bellefair Road, the Applicant shall obtain all necessary permits from the Village for the work proposed at 32 Bellefair Road and shall obtain a Temporary Construction Easement from the owner of property located at 32 Bellefair Road for the purpose of removing the encroaching wall, performing grading activities, and installing vegetative ground cover over disturbed areas. The Applicant shall submit the Temporary Construction Easement to the Village for review and approval by the Village Attorney as to form. Page 16 of 19 3. The Ash tree located up-hill in proximity of the new wall shall be removed. A replacement tree or payment to the Village's Street Tree Fund shall be provided in accordance with Chapter 235 of the Village Code. Any replacement tree must be located at least 15 feet from the top of the retaining wall. 4. The Applicant shall remove the invasive species listed on the Landscape Plan (Ivy, hedera helix; and Periwinkle, vinca minor) and replace them with native species to the satisfaction of the Village Engineer/Superintendent of Public Works, or eliminate the invasive species altogether without replacement. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that no permits shall be issued until the Applicant has paid to the Village all applicable fees and professional review fees incurred in connection with review of this Application. On motion by Ms. Schoen, seconded by Mr. Grzan, Mr. Mi hell Nowak, Superintendent of Public Works, called the roll: Dominick Accurso,Jr. Vo!tting9 g YE John Grzan Vo , S Sal Morlino Vox Jeffrey Richman S Amy Schoen S Daniel Tartaglia g YES Robert Goodman, Chairman A V g YES Page 17 of 19 From: Gene Strum [mai Ito:estrum@optonline.net] Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2016 12:24 PM To: Christopher Bradbury Cc: David M. Heiser Subject: 2 Elm Hill - Subdivision Chris, Trustee Heiser indicated that you thought it best if this message to the planning board were delivered through you: am writing concerning the proposed subdivision at 2 Hill Drive. I reside and own at 308 Betsy Brown Road, and although I live nearb roposed subdivision I have no objection in principle to adding two residences to t ar do have some concerns on planning issues. A �% As a means of introduction to the ers f th board, I served on the Village Board of Trustees from 1995 to 1999. For the six yea before that I served as the chair of your board — the Village Planning an as a member of such board for four years prior to that. My concerns on the proposed plan are twofold: First, the subdivision code calls for a street plan that provides a cul-de-sac at the end of any permanent dead end. When the portion of Betsy Brown Road terminating at Crawford Park was originally laid out, the Crawford property was in private hands. The terminus of the road could be considered a temporary dead end as there was the very real prospect that the Crawford property could henceforth be subdivided and Betsy Brown Road could then be continued. Now, however, the Crawford property is designated parkland, and the road cannot be extended, so the dead end is permanent. To be fully compliant, the subdivision application should include such change in the street plan. Upon reflection, I do feel it would be inappropriate to impose such a requirement in this instance as it would prove to be a dramatic increase in the impervious area -- providing drainage issues. I do think the opportunity should be taken Page 18 of 19 to obtain for a more attractive end of this street with, although not a full cul-de-sac, a more reasonable area in which cars are able to turn around. This could be accomplished by reducing the land area of Lot #1 , while still leaving it code compliant. Second, the proposed plan shows a fifteen foot wide swath running between Betsy Brown Road and Lot #2, with this property belonging to Lot #1. The stated purpose of this is to be able to run utilities without excavating on the road itself. In my opinion and experience such a plan would result in difficulties in the future with the responsibility of maintaining such land. In all probability, the Village would have to step in at some future time and provide maintenance — an inconvenient and unhappy result. As Betsy Brown Road is a collector street and therefore very wide, and as only 3 homes are locating on this stub end of the street, the excavation of the road would not be a major inconvenience (probably no more inconvenient than the excavation in this proposed swath of land), leaving sufficient room for access to thELse existing driveways, and would be a better alternative to providing these utilities to #1, with regular lot lines. 14 1, would hope the Planning Board would c nsider these comments as the deliberations of this subdivision proceed. Eugene (Gene) Strum 308 Betsy Brown Road 914 939-4833 estrum(aD-optonline.net Page 19 of 19 QyE BR t t7 19 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK MAYOR 938 King Street, Rye Brook, N.Y. 10573 ADMINISTRATOR Paul S. Rosenberg (914)939-1121 Fax(914) 939-0242 Christopher J. Bradbury www.ryebrook.org TRUSTEES Susan R. Epstein David M. Heiser Jason A.Klein Jeffrey B. Rednick March 18, 2016 To: Village of Rye Brook Planning Board Attn: Robert I. Goodman, Chairman 938 King Street Rye Brook, N.Y. 10573 Subject: Notification of Intent to Declare Lead Auncy Pursuant to 6 NYCRR 617 Dear Sir: The Village of Rye Brook Board of Trustees hereby notifies you that it is reviewing a subdivision application, a zoning petition and a site plan application submitted by Pawling Holdings and Louis Larizza on behalf of the property owner, Daniel Greto, to subdivide the 3.96-acre property known as 259 North Ridge Street, Section 135.35, Block 1, Lot 11 on the Town of Rye Tax Map, located at the intersection of West Ridge Drive and North Ridge Street, into three lots and amend the Village Zoning Map to add one of the lots into the FAH District to construct eight units of Fair and Affordable Housing on one lot and two market-rate single family dwellings on the other two lots in the R-15 District, which will require an approval from your agency. The Village Board of Trustees hereby declares its intent to be the Lead Agency for the review of the action under SEQRA. Enclosed is a Lead Agency Selection Reply Form for your use. Pursuant to SEQRA, the Village Board of Trustees will automatically become the Lead Agency unless you submit a written objection to the Board of Trustees within 30 calendar days of the mailing of this notification. Very truly yours, Paul S. Rosenberg, Mayor and the Village of Rye Brook Board of Trustees 259 NORTH RIDGE STREET— SUBDIVISION, ZONING MAP AMENDMENT, AND SITE PLAN VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK, NEW YORK LEAD AGENCY SELECTION REPLY FORM The (specify agency) examined the Lead Agency notification form and the accompanying documentation for a subdivision, zoning map amendment, and a site plan for fair and affordable homes at 259 King Street, and: (Check A or B) ❑ A. Does not want to be the Lead Agency for this action. ❑ B. Wants to be the Lead Agency for this action. Additional comments or concerns(attach additional pages if necessary): Reviewed by: Signature Name Title Date WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE MAILING DATE OF THE NOTIFICATION, PLEASE RETURN THIS FORM TO: Christopher Bradbury, Village Administrator Village of Rye Brook 938 King Street Rye Brook, New York 10573 Phone: (914) 939-1121 FAX: (914) 939-0242 Ig. -. , ,r 1•i ;,., I�: ... , ,ri•i .r, Ii„... u1• i r � i Cil,�•1 idif's: s � ## 1 i,! 1 ¢ ! � m r; - is Ili�Elil�tJ IL i,��lu IIl'F i,;�i 11°t �!n i• �i�i[11i i� ni�E i, E lilt .� -\-��— •�-- ., -�• t� 1 I/� �°ted. � E Full Environmental Assessment Form Part I-Project and Setting Instructions for Completing Part 1 Part 1 is to be completed by the applicant or project sponsor. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding, are subject to public review,and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item,please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information;indicate whether missing information does not exist, or is not reasonably available to the sponsor;and,when possible,generally describe work or studies which would be necessary to update or fully develop that information. Applicants/sponsors must complete all items in Sections A&B. In Sections C,D&E,most items contain an initial question that must be answered either"Yes"or"No". If the answer to the initial question is"Yes",complete the sub-questions that follow. If the answer to the initial question is"No",proceed to the next question. Section F allows the project sponsor to identify and attach any additional information. Section G requires the name and signature of the project sponsor to verify that the information contained in Part lis accurate and complete. A.Project and Sponsor Information. Name of Action or Project: North Ridge Street Subdivision Project Location(describe,and attach a general location map): 259 North Ridge Street,Rye Brook,NY 10573 Brief Description of Proposed Action(include purpose or need): ----•.- •-... _.. ..._ 1 Project is to subdivisde a 3.96 acre properly in the R-15 zoning district and the Scenic Road Overlay District into threeiots. Lot#1 is proposed for eight(8)units of Fair and Affordable Housing in two(2)buildings. - -- -----� Lot#2 contains an existing single family dwelling that is to be refurbished. Lot#3 is proposed for a new single family dwelling. ; JAN 1 3 2016 t Name of Applicant/Sponsor: Telephone: 914-879-7905 Lou Larizza,Contract Vendee E-Mail: Address: 8 Hilltop Drive City/PO: port Chester State: New York Zip Code: 10573 Project Contact(if not same as sponsor;give name and title/role): Telephone: E-Mail: Address: City/PO: State: Zip Code: Property Owner (if not same as sponsor): Telephone: 914-967-5892 Daniel J.Greto E-Mail: Address: 209 Central Avenue City/PO: Rye State: New York Zip Code:10580 Page 1 of 13 B.Government Approvals B.Government Approvals,Funding,or Sponsorship. ("Funding"includes grants,loans,tax relief,and any other forms of financial assistance.) Government Entity If Yes:Identify Agency and Approval(s) Application Date Required (Actual or projected) a.City Council,Town Board, ®Yes❑NO Zoning Map Amendment September 25,2015 or Village Board of Trustees Subdivision Approval b.City,Town or Village 0Yes0N0 Review and recommendation to Village Board September 25,2015 Planning Board or Commission of Trustees c.City Council,Town or ❑Yes❑No Village Zoning Board of Appeals d.Other local agencies ❑YesONo e.County agencies ®Yes❑No WCDH Subdivision Plat Approval County Road Permit f.Regional agencies ❑YesONo g.State agencies ❑YesONo h.Federal agencies ❑Yesoio i. Coastal Resources. i. Is the project site within a Coastal Area,or the waterfront area of a Designated Inland Waterway? ❑Yes®No ii. Is the project site located in a community with an approved Local Waterfront Revitalization Program? ❑Yes®No iii. Is the project site within a Coastal Erosion Hazard Area? ❑Yes®No C.Planning and Zoning C.1.Planning and zoning actions. Will administrative or legislative adoption,or amendment of a plan,local law,ordinance,rule or regulation be the ❑Yes®No only approval(s)which must be granted to enable the proposed action to proceed? • If Yes,complete sections C,F and G. • If No,proceed to question C.2 and complete all remaining sections and questions in Part 1 C.2.Adopted land use plans. a.Do any municipally-adopted (city,town,village or county)comprehensive land use plan(s)include the site ®Yes❑No where the proposed action would be located? If Yes,does the comprehensive plan include specific recommendations for the site where the proposed action ❑Yes®No would be located? b.Is the site of the proposed action withinloc regional special planning district(for example: Greenway ❑Yes®No Brownfield Opportunity Area(BOA);designated State or Federal heritage area;watershed management plan; or other?) If Yes,identify the plan(s): c. Is the proposed action located wholly or partially within an area listed in an adopted municipal open space plan, ❑Yes®No or an adopted municipal farmland protection plan? If Yes,identify the plan(s): Page 2 of 13 C.3. Zoning a. Is the site of the proposed action located in a municipality with an adopted zoning law or ordinance. ®Yes❑No If Yes,what is the zoning classification(s)including any applicable overlay district? R-15 zoning district and the Scenic Road Overlay District b. Is the use permitted or allowed by a special or conditional use permit? ®Yes❑No c.Is a zoning change requested as part of the proposed action? ®Yes❑No If Yes, L What is the proposed new zoning for the site? Lot#1 to be rezoned from the R-15 District to the Fair and Affordable Housing District(FAH) CA.Existing community services. a.In what school district is the project site located? Blind Brook Scholl District b.What police or other public protection forces serve the project site? Village of Rye Brook c.Which fire protection and emergency medical services serve the project site? Village of Rye Brook d.What parks serve the project site? Rich Manor Park.Pine Ridge Park, Crawford Park D.Project Details D.I.Proposed and Potential Development a.What is the general nature of the proposed action(e.g.,residential,industrial,commercial,recreational;if mixed,include all components)? Residential b.a.Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? 3.96 acres b.Total acreage to be physically disturbed? 1_7s acres c.Total acreage(project site and any contiguous properties)owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? 3.96 acres c.Is the proposed action an expansion of an existing project or use? ❑Yes®No L If Yes,what is the approximate percentage of the proposed expansion and identify the units(e.g.,acres,miles,housing units, square feet)? % Units: d.Is the proposed action a subdivision,or does it include a subdivision? ®Yes❑No If Yes, L Purpose or type of subdivision?(e.g.,residential,industrial,commercial;if mixed,specify types) Residential ii. Is a cluster/conservation layout proposed? ❑Yes ONo iii.Number of lots proposed? iv. Minimum and maximum proposed lot sizes? Minimum 1 A Acres Maximum 1.4 Acres e.Will proposed action be constructed in multiple phases? ❑Yes®No L If No,anticipated period of construction: 6 months ii. If Yes: • Total number of phases anticipated • Anticipated commencement date of phase 1 (including demolition) month year • Anticipated completion date of final phase month _year • Generally describe connections or relationships among phases,including any contingencies where progress of one phase may determine timing or duration of future phases: Page 3 of 13 f.Does the project include new residential uses? ®Yes❑No If Yes,show numbers of units proposed. One Family Two Family Three Family Multiple Family four or more Initial Phase 10 At completion of all phases 10 g.Does the proposed action include new non-residential construction(including expansions)? ❑Yes®No If Yes, i.Total number of structures U. Dimensions(in feet)of largest proposed structure: height; width; and length iii. Approximate extent of building space to be heated or cooled: square feet h.Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that will result in the impoundment of any ❑Yes®No liquids,such as creation of a water supply,reservoir,pond,lake,waste lagoon or other storage? If Yes, L Purpose of the impoundment: ii. If a water impoundment,the principal source of the water: El Ground water❑Surface water streams❑Other specify: iii. If other than water,identify the type of impounded/contained liquids and their source. iv. Approximate size of the proposed impoundment. Volume: million gallons;surface area: acres v.Dimensions of the proposed dam or impounding structure: height; length vi. Construction method/materials for the proposed dam or impounding structure(e.g.,earth fill,rock,wood,concrete): D.2. Project Operations a.Does the proposed action include any excavation,mining,or dredging,during construction,operations,or both? ❑Yes®No (Not including general site preparation,grading or installation of utilities or foundations where all excavated materials will remain onsite) If Yes: i.What is the purpose of the excavation or dredging? U. How much material(including rock,earth,sediments,etc.)is proposed to be removed from the site? • Volume(specify tons or cubic yards): • Over what duration of time? iii. Describe nature and characteristics of materials to be excavated or dredged,and plans to use,manage or dispose of them. iv. Will there be onsite dewatering or processing of excavated materials? Yes No If yes,describe. v.What is the total area to be dredged or excavated? acres vi. What is the maximum area to be worked at any one time? acres vii. What would be the maximum depth of excavation or dredging? feet viii. Will the excavation require blasting? ❑Yes❑No ix. Summarize site reclamation goals and plan: b.Would the proposed action cause or result in alteration of,increase or decrease in size of,or encroachment Yes No into any existing wetland,waterbody,shoreline,beach or adjacent area? If Yes: L Identify the wetland or waterbody which would be affected(by name,water index number,wetland map number or geographic description): Page 4 of 13 ii. Describe how the proposed action would affect that waterbody or wetland,e.g.excavation,fill,placement of structures,or alteration of channels,banks and shorelines. Indicate extent of activities,alterations and additions in square feet or acres: iii. Will proposed action cause or result in disturbance to bottom sediments? ❑Yes❑No If Yes,describe: iv. Will proposed action cause or result in the destruction or removal of aquatic vegetation? ❑Yes❑No If Yes: • acres of aquatic vegetation proposed to be removed: • expected acreage of aquatic vegetation remaining after project completion: • purpose of proposed removal(e.g.beach clearing,invasive species control,boat access): • proposed method of plant removal: • if chemical/herbicide treatment will be used,specify product(s): v. Describe any proposed reclamation/mitigation following disturbance: c.Will the proposed action use,or create a new demand for water? ®Yes Flo If Yes: L Total anticipated water usage/demand per day: 1.000 gallons/day ii. Will the proposed action obtain water from an existing public water supply? ❑Yes❑No If Yes: • Name of district or service area: United Water Westchester • Does the existing public water supply have capacity to serve the proposal? ®Yes[:]No • Is the project site in the existing district? ®Yes❑No • Is expansion of the district needed? ❑Yes®No • Do existing lines serve the project site? ®Yes❑No M. Will line extension within an existing district be necessary to supply the project? ❑Yes OIo If Yes: • Describe extensions or capacity expansions proposed to serve this project: • Source(s)of supply for the district: iv. Is a new water supply district or service area proposed to be formed to serve the project site? ❑Yes®No If,Yes: • Applicant/sponsor for new district: • Date application submitted or anticipated: • Proposed source(s)of supply for new district: v. If a public water supply will not be used,describe plans to provide water supply for the project: vi.If water supply will be from wells(public or private),maximum pumping capacity: gallons/minute. d.Will the proposed action generate liquid wastes? 0Yes❑No If Yes: L Total anticipated liquid waste generation per day: 1,000 gallons/day ii.Nature of liquid wastes to be generated(e.g.,sanitary wastewater,industrial; if combination,describe all components and approximate volumes or proportions of each): Sanitary watewater iii. Will the proposed action use any existing public wastewater treatment facilities? ®Yes❑No If Yes: • Name of wastewater treatment plant to be used: Blind Brook Wastewater Treatment Plant • Name of district: Blind Brook sewer District • Does the existing wastewater treatment plant have capacity to serve the project? 0Yes❑No • Is the project site in the existing district? ®Yes❑No • Is expansion of the district needed? ❑Yes®No Page 5 of 13 • Do existing sewer lines serve the project site? ®Yes❑No • Will line extension within an existing district be necessary to serve the project? ❑Yes❑No If Yes: • Describe extensions or capacity expansions proposed to serve this project: iv. Will a new wastewater(sewage)treatment district be formed to serve the project site? ❑Yes®No If Yes: • Applicant/sponsor for new district: • Date application submitted or anticipated: • What is the receiving water for the wastewater discharge? v. If public facilities will not be used,describe plans to provide wastewater treatment for the project,including specifying proposed receiving water(name and classification if surface discharge,or describe subsurface disposal plans): vi. Describe any plans or designs to capture,recycle or reuse liquid waste: e.Will the proposed action disturb more than one acre and create stormwater runoff,either from new point ❑Yes®No sources(i.e.ditches,pipes,swales,curbs,gutters or other concentrated flows of stormwater)or non-point source(i.e.sheet flow)during construction or post construction? If Yes: L How much impervious surface will the project create in relation to total size of project parcel? Square feet or acres(impervious surface) Square feet or acres(parcel size) ii. Describe types of new point sources. iii. Where will the stormwater runoff be directed(i.e.on-site stormwater management facility/structures,adjacent properties, groundwater,on-site surface water or off-site surface waters)? • If to surface waters,identify receiving water bodies or wetlands: • Will stormwater runoff flow to adjacent properties? ❑Yes❑No iv. Does proposed plan minimize impervious surfaces,use pervious materials or collect and re-use stormwater? ❑Yes❑No f. Does the proposed action include,or will it use on-site,one or more sources of air emissions,including fuel ❑Yes®No combustion,waste incineration,or other processes or operations? If Yes,identify: LM obile sources during project operations(e.g.,heavy equipment,fleet or delivery vehicles) ii. Stationary sources during construction(e.g.,power generation,structural heating,batch plant,crushers) iii. Stationary sources during operations(e.g.,process emissions,large boilers,electric generation) g.Will any air emission sources named in D.2.f(above),require a NY State Air Registration,Air Facility Permit, ❑Yes®No or Federal Clean Air Act Title IV or Title V Permit? If Yes: i. Is the project site located in an Air quality non-attainment area? (Area routinely or periodically fails to meet []Yes[]No ambient air quality standards for all or some parts of the year) ii. In addition to emissions as calculated in the application,the project will generate: • Tons/year(short tons)of Carbon Dioxide(CO2) • Tons/year(short tons)of Nitrous Oxide(N20) • Tons/year(short tons)of Perfluorocarbon(PFCs) • Tons/year(short tons)of Sulfur Hexafluoride(SF6) • Tons/year(short tons)of Carbon Dioxide equivalent of Hydroflourocarbons(HFCs) • Tons/year(short tons)of Hazardous Air Pollutants(HAPs) Page 6 of 13 h.Will the proposed action generate or emit methane(including,but not limited to,sewage treatment plants, ❑Yes®No landfills,composting facilities)? If Yes: L Estimate methane generation in tons/year(metric): ii.Describe any methane capture,control or elimination measures included in project design(e.g.,combustion to generate heat or electricity,flaring): L Will the proposed action result in the release of air pollutants from open-air operations or processes,such as ❑Yes®No quarry or landfill operations? If Yes:Describe operations and nature of emissions(e.g.,diesel exhaust,rock particulates/dust): j.Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels or generate substantial ❑Yes®No new demand for transportation facilities or services? If Yes: L When is the peak traffic expected(Check all that apply): ❑Morning ❑Evening ❑Weekend ❑Randomly between hours of to ii.For commercial activities only,projected number of semi-trailer truck trips/day: iii. Parking spaces: Existing Proposed Net increase/decrease iv. Does the proposed action include any shared use parking? ❑Yes❑No v. If the proposed action includes any modification of existing roads,creation of new roads or change in existing access,describe: A Are public/private transportation service(s)or facilities available within%z mile of the proposed site? ❑Yes❑No vii Will the proposed action include access to public transportation or accommodations for use of hybrid,electric ❑Yes❑No or other alternative fueled vehicles? viii.Will the proposed action include plans for pedestrian or bicycle accommodations for connections to existing ❑Yes❑No pedestrian or bicycle routes? k.Will the proposed action(for commercial or industrial projects only)generate new or additional demand ❑Yes®No for energy? If Yes: L Estimate annual electricity demand during operation of the proposed action: U. Anticipated sources/suppliers of electricity for the project(e.g.,on-site combustion,on-site renewable,via grid/local utility,or other): iii. Will the proposed action require a new,or an upgrade to,an existing substation? ❑Yes❑No 1.Hours of operation. Answer all items which apply. L During Construction: ii. During Operations: • Monday-Friday: a AM-3 PM 0 Monday-Friday: Not Applicable • Saturday: a AM-a PM 0 Saturday: • Sunday: Nnnp • Sunday: • Holidays: Nnnp 0Holidays: Page 7 of 13 m.Will the proposed action produce noise that will exceed existing ambient noise levels during construction, ❑Yes®No operation,or both? If yes: L Provide details including sources,time of day and duration: ii. Will proposed action remove existing natural barriers that could act as a noise barrier or screen? ❑Yes❑No Describe: n..Will the proposed action have outdoor lighting? ❑YesoNo 1f yes: L Describe source(s),location(s),height of fixture(s),direction/aim,and proximity to nearest occupied structures: H. Will proposed action remove existing natural barriers that could act as a light barrier or screen? ❑Yes❑No Describe: o. Does the proposed action have the potential to produce odors for more than one hour per day? ❑Yes 0No If Yes,describe possible sources,potential frequency and duration of odor emissions,and proximity to nearest occupied structures: p.Will the proposed action include any bulk storage of petroleum(combined capacity of over 1,100 gallons) ❑Yes®No or chemical products 185 gallons in above ground storage or any amount in underground storage? If Yes: L Product(s)to be stored ii. Volume(s) per unit time (e.g.,month,year) iii. Generally describe proposed storage facilities: q.Will the proposed action(commercial,industrial and recreational projects only)use pesticides(i.e.,herbicides, ❑Yes ®No insecticides)during construction or operation? If Yes: L Describe proposed treatment(s): ii. Will the proposed action use Integrated Pest Management Practices? ❑ Yes ❑No r.Will the proposed action(commercial or industrial projects only)involve or require the management or disposal ❑ Yes ONo of solid waste(excluding hazardous materials)? If Yes: L Describe any solid waste(s)to be generated during construction or operation of the facility: • Construction: tons per (unit of time) • Operation: tons per (unit of time) ii. Describe any proposals for on-site minimization,recycling or reuse of materials to avoid disposal as solid waste: • Construction: • Operation: iii.Proposed disposal methods/facilities for solid waste generated on-site: • Construction: • Operation: Page 8 of 13 s.Does the proposed action include construction or modification of a solid waste management facility? ❑Yes® No If Yes: i. Type of management or handling of waste proposed for the site(e.g.,recycling or transfer station,composting,landfill,or other disposal activities): ii. Anticipated rate of disposal/processing: • Tons/month,if transfer or other non-combustion/thermal treatment,or • Tons/hour,if combustion or thermal treatment iii. If landfill,anticipated site life: years t.Will proposed action at the site involve the commercial generation,treatment,storage,or disposal of hazardous ❑Yes®No waste? If Yes: L Names)of all hazardous wastes or constituents to be generated,handled or managed at facility: H. Generally describe processes or activities involving hazardous wastes or constituents: iii. Specify amount to be handled or generated tons/month iv. Describe any proposals for on-site minimization,recycling or reuse of hazardous constituents: v. Will any hazardous wastes be disposed at an existing offsite hazardous waste facility? Yes No If Yes:provide name and location of facility: If No:describe proposed management of any hazardous wastes which will not be sent to a hazardous waste facility: E.Site and Setting of Proposed Action E.1.Land uses on and surrounding the project site a.Existing land uses. i. Check all uses that occur on,adjoining and near the project site. ❑ Urban ❑ Industrial ❑ Commercial ® Residential(suburban) ❑Rural(non-farm) ❑ Forest ❑ Agriculture ❑ Aquatic ❑ Other(specify): ii. If mix of uses,generally describe: b.Land uses and covertypes on the project site. Land use or Current Acreage After Change Covertype Acreage Project Completion (Acres+/-) • Roads,buildings,and other paved or impervious surfaces 0.10 0.75 0.65 • Forested 2.59 1.70 0.89 • Meadows,grasslands or brushlands(non- agricultural,including abandoned agricultural) • Agricultural (includes active orchards,field,greenhouse etc.) • Surface water features (lakes,ponds,streams,rivers,etc.) • Wetlands(freshwater or tidal) 1.17 1.17 0 • Non-vegetated(bare rock,earth or fill) • Other Describe: Residential landscaping 0.10 0.34 0.24 Page 9 of 13 c.Is the project site presently used by members of the community for public recreation? ❑Yes✓❑No i. If Yes:explain: d.Are there any facilities serving children,the elderly,people with disabilities(e.g.,schools,hospitals,licensed ❑Yes®No day care centers,or group homes)within 1500 feet of the project site? If Yes, i. Identify Facilities: e.Does the project site contain an existing dam? ❑Yes®No If Yes: i. Dimensions of the dam and impoundment: • Dam height: feet • Dam length: feet • Surface area: acres • Volume impounded: gallons OR acre-feet ii. Dam's existing hazard classification: iii. Provide date and summarize results of last inspection: f.Has the project site ever been used as a municipal,commercial or industrial solid waste management facility, ❑Yes®No or does the project site adjoin property which is now,or was at one time,used as a solid waste management facility? If Yes: L Has the facility been formally closed? ❑Yes❑No • If yes,cite sources/documentation: ii. Describe the location of the project site relative to the boundaries of the solid waste management facility: iii. Describe any development constraints due to the prior solid waste activities: g.Have hazardous wastes been generated,treated and/or disposed of at the site,or does the project site adjoin ❑Yes®No property which is now or was at one time used to commercially treat,store and/or dispose of hazardous waste? If Yes: L Describe waste(s)handled and waste management activities,including approximate time when activities occurred: h. Potential contamination history. Has there been a reported spill at the proposed project site,or have any ❑Yes® No remedial actions been conducted at or adjacent to the proposed site? If Yes: L Is any portion of the site listed on the NYSDEC Spills Incidents database or Environmental Site ❑Yes❑No Remediation database? Check all that apply: ❑ Yes—Spills Incidents database Provide DEC ID number(s): ❑ Yes—Environmental Site Remediation database Provide DEC ID number(s): ❑ Neither database ii. If site has been subject of RCRA corrective activities,describe control measures: W. Is the project within 2000 feet of any site in the NYSDEC Environmental Site Remediation database? ❑Yes®No If yes,provide DEC ID number(s): iv. If yes to(i),(ii)or(iii)above,describe current status of site(s): Page 10 of 13 v. Is the project site subject to an institutional control limiting property uses? ❑Yes❑No • If yes,DEC site ID number: • Describe the type of institutional control(e.g.,deed restriction or easement): • Describe any use limitations: • Describe any engineering controls: • Will the project affect the institutional or engineering controls in place? ❑Yes❑No • Explain: E.2. Natural Resources On or Near Project Site a.What is the average depth to bedrock on the project site? 0-6'feet b.Are there bedrock outcroppings on the project site? ®Yes❑No If Yes,what proportion of the site is comprised of bedrock outcroppings? 1 % c.Predominant soil type(s)present on project site: Urban Land-Charlton Complex 100% d.What is the average depth to the water table on the project site? Average: o-6- feet e.Drainage status of project site soils:® Well Drained: __AC-%of site ® Moderately Well Drained: __3e%of site ® Poorly Drained _ae%of site f.Approximate proportion of proposed action site with slopes: ® 0-10%: __Z52/o of site ® 10-15%: _2p_%of site ® 15%or greater: __5210 of site g.Are there any unique geologic features on the project site? Yes®No If Yes,describe: h.Surface water features. L Does any portion of the project site contain wetlands or other waterbodies(including streams,rivers, ®Yes❑No ponds or lakes)? H. Do any wetlands or other waterbodies adjoin the project site? ❑Yes®No If Yes to either i or ii,continue. If No,skip to E.2.i. iii. Are any of the wetlands or waterbodies within or adjoining the project site regulated by any federal, ®Yes❑No state or local agency? iv. For each identified regulated wetland and waterbody on the project site,provide the following information: Streams: Name Classification • Lakes or Ponds: Name Classification • Wetlands: Name Village regulated wetland Approximate Size 1.17 Acres • Wetland No.(if regulated by DEC) v. Are any of the above water bodies listed in the most recent compilation of NYS water quality-impaired ❑Yes Zio waterbodies? If yes,name of impaired water body/bodies and basis for listing as impaired: i.Is the project site in a designated Floodway? [--]Yes 0,4o j.Is the project site in the 100 year Floodplain? ❑Yeso10 k.Is the project site in the 500 year Floodplain? ❑Yesoio 1.Is the project site located over,or immediately adjoining,a primary,principal or sole source aquifer? ❑YesO-4o If Yes: i.Name of aquifer: Page 11 of 13 in. Identify the predominant wildlife species that occupy or use the project site: n.Does the project site contain a designated significant natural community? ❑Yes0io If Yes: i. Describe the habitat/community(composition,function,and basis for designation): ii. Source(s)of description or evaluation: W. Extent of community/habitat: • Currently: acres • Following completion of project as proposed: acres • Gain or loss(indicate+or-): acres o.Does project site contain any species of plant or animal that is listed by the federal government or NYS as ❑Yes®No endangered or threatened,or does it contain any areas identified as habitat for an endangered or threatened species? p. Does the project site contain any species of plant or animal that is listed by NYS as rare,or as a species of Yes®No special concern? q.Is the project site or adjoining area currently used for hunting,trapping,fishing or shell fishing? ❑Yes®No If yes,give a brief description of how the proposed action may affect that use: E.3. Designated Public Resources On or Near Project Site a.Is the project site,or any portion of it,located in a designated agricultural district certified pursuant to ❑Yesoio Agriculture and Markets Law,Article 25-AA,Section 303 and 304? If Yes, provide county plus district name/number: b.Are agricultural lands consisting of highly productive soils present? ❑Yes®No i. If Yes:acreage(s)on project site? H. Source(s)of soil rating(s): c. Does the project site contain all or part of,or is it substantially contiguous to,a registered National ❑Yes®No Natural Landmark? If Yes: i. Nature of the natural landmark: ❑Biological Community ❑ Geological Feature H. Provide brief description of landmark,including values behind designation and approximate size/extent: d.Is the project site located in or does it adjoin a state listed Critical Environmental Area? ❑Yes®No If Yes: i. CEA name: H. Basis for designation: W. Designating agency and date: Page 12 of 13 e.Does the project site contain,or is it substantially contiguous to,a building,archaeological site,or district ❑Yes®No which is listed on,or has been nominated by the NYS Board of Historic Preservation for inclusion on,the State or National Register of Historic Places? If Yes: i.Nature of historic/archaeological resource: ❑Archaeological Site ❑Historic Building or District U.Name: W. Brief description of attributes on which listing is based: f.Is the project site,or any portion of it,located in or adjacent to an area designated as sensitive for ❑YesONo archaeological sites on the NY State Historic Preservation Office(SHPO)archaeological site inventory? g.Have additional archaeological or historic site(s)or resources been identified on the project site? ❑Yes®No If Yes: i.Describe possible resource(s): ii. Basis for identification: h.Is the project site within fives miles of any officially designated and publicly accessible federal,state,or local ❑Yes®No scenic or aesthetic resource? If Yes: i. Identify resource: ii.Nature of,or basis for,designation(e.g.,established highway overlook,state or local park,state historic trail or scenic byway, etc.): iii. Distance between project and resource: miles. i. Is the project site located within a designated river corridor under the Wild,Scenic and Recreational Rivers ❑Yes®No Program 6 NYCRR 666? If Yes: i. Identify the name of the river and its designation: ii. Is the activity consistent with development restrictions contained in 6NYCRR Part 666? ❑Yes❑No F.Additional Information Attach any additional information which may be needed to clarify your project. If you have identified any adverse impacts which could be associated with your proposal,please describe those impacts plus any measures which you propose to avoid or minimize them. G. Verification I certify that the information provided is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor Name Lou Larizza Date January 7,2016 Signature Title _ PRINT FORM Page 13 of 13 EAF Mapper Summary Report Thursday, January 14,2016 2:02 PM Disclaimer: The EAF Mapper is a screening tool intended to assist i� '� I project sponsors and reviewing agencies in preparing an environmental - '+,- 13526-.1-63-J _� 135.271 8 1, 135.26 --46-`f I 135.27-1:34 _ assessment form(EAF).Not all questions asked in the EAF are L-�"�-+ I 1 135.2 7-1-11135 27-1-18 4 r � 135.27°i=57 answered by the EAF Mapper.Additional information on any EAF 135.26-1'-53-13527-1-1� 135.27-1;33 --. question can be obtained by consulting the EAF Workbooks. Although 135.26-1-625 279 r 135.27-1-29( q g 1. 527 1� 0 '� the EAF Mapper provides the most up-to-date digital data available to "^(-1 5.2 7-1=2135 219'-1-9135.27y 1 2 0"135.27-1�32T 135x2 7-1-28` DEC,you may also need to contact local or other data sources in order 135.26-1-551 1.35 27.1-8 13527_1=41 / 135.27-1-30J to obtain data not provided by the Mapper.Digital data Is not a 14_ 26_1-611135.27-1-3 1 - } 135.27-1131 135;271 27, substitute for agency determinations. 1 7-1.-2:11 f i y� f~ ! 3 135.27-1-4 13 27-1-47.135.T7_i^42135527-1-2 +�'- 135:26-1-6� -- --, 135.27-1-431`35.y1-24�r-��� 1�lontrbal - 1.35,26-1-56135.26-1-71135.27-1- 1 27-1/-46y � �13527-1-23135.2-73G�^a T 7- 2 / 135.2 7-)-44 v 135.26-1-59}}135.26-1- 2 1 5.27-1-45 13515-1-36, ~- 411. / -4 Ry* 135.3y1-?24X, 135.35-1-35 �onP'�I�r �acu 135.341- 7 135.35-1-1 �.' 135.35-111 5.35-t-23 15 35-I-3 I Taaitto 1135.34-1 2615.34-1=28 d� 35 1-22 t �; Roc ea r. ►r�i+f vnF�. W orrord _1 35.35-1,-38 s-- fj 1 5.34-1 `32 135.35-1-9 35-1 2.1 l� I t9 cpatroit BO tla• gtbiny� ti, Boston 135[341 34 �35 -{ (135��-293.5:35-1=61 irroridence 35�341-338 135.35'-1.'-20- t 1 Cleveland / y113 5-1:-30 X135.35-1-60 p Ha ad 1 135.341 31135'.3 -1-1135. $OF� 5�fs s R` -i----i 35-1- nterrria ..mc Corp:, Esd f riE. 5.3,41 47 I ' JifETI,"Es ��i�rC: i OKI,- t� ' Intertns 135341_4 1 35 35-1-2 (>t ...� f �I p PiltaburQh Harrjsburg. 5 F. 135.35,1 3 ��+d�fa_ Irtdil�rr - S�tr #1t0e¢r167 mbua mQ asp.,NRCAN, 135 341=55; 1,35.34-132 135.35-;I;4 m^�'4'�`�'g ' o "f-9u . -45 1,! Washirfphonti �8pe°•METI.Esri G�+ma B.i.i [Coastal or Waterfront Area] No B.i.ii[Local Waterfront Revitalization Area] No C.2.b. [Special Planning District] Digital mapping data are not available or are incofmnplgtRefer to EAF Workbook.-5r,e 'i G MA DY SMI E.1.h [DEC Spills or Remediation Site- Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Potential Contamination History] Workbook. E.1.h.i[DEC Spills or Remediation Site- Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Listed] Workbook. E.1.h.i [DEC Spills or Remediation Site- Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Environmental Site Remediation Database] Workbook. E.1.h.iii[Within 2,000'of DEC Remediation No Site] E.2.g [Unique Geologic Features] No E.2.h.i [Surface Water Features] No E.2.h.ii [Surface Water Features] Yes E.2.h.iii [Surface Water Features] Yes-Digital mapping information on local and federal wetlands and waterbodies is known to be incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. E.2.h.v[Impaired Water Bodies] No E.2.i. [Floodway] No E.2.j. [100 Year Floodplain] No E.2.k. [500 Year Floodplain] No E.2.1. [Aquifers] No E.2.n. [Natural Communities] No E.2.o. [Endangered or Threatened Species] No -T - - JAN 14 216 E.2.p. [Rare Plants or Animals] No _ ( Full Environmental Assessment Form- EAF Mapper Summary Report 1 E.3.a. [Agricultural District] No E.3.c. [National Natural Landmark] No E.3.d [Critical Environmental Area] No E.3.e. [National Register of Historic Places] Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. E.3.f. [Archeological Sites] No E.3.i. [Designated River Corridor] No Full Environmental Assessment Form- EAF Mapper Summary Report olIf *" ��'` ls §(^: \ o §2\\ /r \\ f \ > < \ +/ / \ \ \ 2y : °j \ \\ 26j\\� \) 2 \ 4 - > :E _ \ \ \\ \ 0d » j \ ) \ co 6.4 - _ \\ � © 2 , 2 \ K 2 2 � ~ \ / : ",q \�~� \ \ 2 <Z/\ z r \\ © 2 > < \ 2/ / \ \ \ 2> ° °j \ \\ \ /\(� L22 \ \ \ \ \\ ul \ & » j )` § » \ \° ;\ : \ \ ( Z co - � ) 2 C\ Z - � � 2 y \; = ^ ^ » ( � \ _ 2 4 \� c ~° * ? } - _ � >} . y } \\ \ � 1 ~ W NY W O� OZ 10�3 z �� 0 _ oz Qo`o O N WO CA _ z ® 0 � LU 0, 0,W IL 00 Z Q J N N� 0 r LU O W o Q V P U 00 "l 1 LU 1 c 0 Qw Q w W �� S LY 0 0 Q o z 9 Is o O um o LL ii f S� 1 a5 9 W W o : qo, =oo m S ~ ii� W O W YrW z � Oz 1 W OZ zu 5,o O �W Q m00 ® O V 0 0,� m U 00 0 O Q _j L L' m Ll W m m O z m0 N — LLI cv =w Q W U0 1 d �3 S LU 0 Ly coZ 0 um o LL ii f S� 1 a5 9 s o�w ; 4 � i 2}^® » \ o §2\\ \ /r \\ f \ > < / +/ / \ \ \ 2> ° °j \ \\ z LL Q L tL2 2 [ \ \ \ \ 00 / 0LU » 0 )` § » % \° ;\ e \ / / \ 3 - � ) 2 C\ Z - � y \; = ^ ^ » ( � \ 99 , i \ /\, Z 7 Z < /\ \ \ ? } � 2 : * - _ ° Z/ >< W0J'OOHVA®H0dVNH0 MIOA M3N'AWf100 83153110153M °� �. �JNla�ll SOZS 869(;£450L CO N8'NO3NOUL IS tl% N210A M3N'i13153H0 lii0d NyNaNaoI��Q HIS H9f1omi o z o 3f1NRI 531IL5 ZZ9 133>J15 39021 HII v IMIS xamH HIHOx N0003S SS0�0 ia9�axV xHOwanxrc x�a ,�ar�ao�Ma zzvz E [rW E W �T� gEIII - T lull-Mi II MOMMffi MMR, =ITIT, ., IEIII=III=ID=u rau=w=lrl- �IT�IT=ITS I=III�TI�TI=iI O mlll=lll=lll=u o ILII=III=III= eieilll� �I-ueieil-li Z amll o lmlWm 11-111-11 11 s =II� Tml l I MINE nl I I�PER,- �I Im--m� r�ml�l���- $ ill it III-lu=l o f-I M =IIm m ml I=IIIII� � m=mi WE II IIIIII _ II= m 1 11 III-III-III T T HE Ti II=I111 TI Hill IE II-III T 1 HEIIIA] �TIWLi TIll IIS HIIII=III=IIIA1 SII=I�I�II= I IIII�iWl�l� III w w AMER, I. n I I II�TWITi�l�1 8{{1I-I�il-��m _ � IIg=Wlil�l�u 2 IIWIIII r Oq �IIi�IIIIIll LL a ��u'�E N O W-�W- o �IIII IRS IWI�III olri-lueieill-1 (' zi ='�11�TW111�� Z 3F��ITi�II�T�l1im T Wlil Z mi Z Z iiml l OII II O HIM i l ml 5 -m-9 m U iall=m=lie m U =III.9 W =o ielil-II W -m_ rlall=ul=re N I ml�iml? II- lili: (n M��m---�i (n =II U) l lml�lElllm V) Allimf0S < UN1-9111911-- UN e Il = IIE e il lum sm 'mmi'I'�=mn=i _ _ I'M 0 I__I IIS lilml M ,W,o I I IT 11 Hill II Ilb'lllIII llllll_ IIII IIIm I IIS II-III-II li mN-UM �I��W-III-III= _ Mill 111111 111111111111 sm III- -,WIli�II I_�u_=I BT HE I �lulMITI� �g i--=IIImo'�ll��II�--�EIII�w-wIlI=-��IImEIIII'II=-��IIammEIIII'II=--��IImEIIIIII 'II II- -i�IIIL =�IuI-II--uII a IWl�l�l�ll-u�-I-�il m I -�� I -�m�llrerere u=w=II=IY= liewdudlr-lieiel w- p �= MEE-w-W-m-Lm-ITM_�l l�il II-III-IIS AME I II -SII =_EIIE =IT-�11�iI=IT II-IIk IiiI�II�ITINIIII o _ - i. II w-ITI-III-II L :o - TIT=ITI�il=ue IeITI=C o¢` II�II�TImTWIImTi�u III lip RELF lw mu=m=rIl=m=ilmilml JMRutLFEtLFmm IISIi=E=EIIlL11 L III �LIomt - MO' A WI Ig tLFtLFA M OM =-u EU11 EII g eoe rrr m_Imm l m lrr��mm- III I I I1 I I E11_Ill�l l l-�l lEUEIIrll11rl=rllll�rl1H III =u =ul= r_Er_Eul� uE 'I �4r�rr�m� IIS 111 11111M.110 mg-illlal= mErl I II�L illil�l�il=_I mll l=_I mr l�l'm VIII: ONE l 11-111011-111-115111 ml 0 l T T HE Iml�-rr�rr�m=�I I HE I-III-IIEI I= _mom llimllimlli =m=gym= mlTil�rrml�Ynl� it mn=m-5H 11 111 l 1111-II 1- -III III II I 1111111111111-111111111-IgII E� 11 _m[ T _.�. _ __=ems , 3 lekd r . , 'KN s . . �/oz az2\ lRaNd/laAaG SNOUVA313 ■} | | f � ] | � �2�op 2O�R \�o 222 Om 2mM _ � _ ( 0 ( \ _ � e° _ 2 \ % k % k \ m \ \ \ \ \ § | z ° oq } : q } § R/ k { { / 2 j < / „ r / � / \ \ \ d ) 0 / 2 \ \ \ \ q 0 \ / m 0L: 2 2 § ■ f) | � § n 5 , | z � o - ILL. 2 , � qu � d� � . � 0 < q , � - e � � 2 \ 2 | 0 I : | 2 / --- mum! -- 2 \ 6 \ � § ' ---� \ pEv F v� o E v E E _ �E - _ v E -E 9`E O E M SEP aEds -- 00 rE E • � Baa.. za._� - � N a O O N . . Y Z - E o - o O O ' 00 _ C5 O LL O O O O O L N O O O N N N N 00 O v �o �6 m 3zm N E L o Z Z 00 w .3 — qm to o°C z o �o •R' a o g7 9 N �n J om pEv E v� ��v �E £E Ea wE mEw- r E a v E v Q V_ N C M - Y Z - oq m •� M • 1� E c o - o W 7 •O •� •N •M •V N W O M Il O O O O • •O •� •O - 0 CO O O • •O •O •� •� • O C5 v1 I� Iq •O •� • •N .. o.¢o ' �p O� M 9 e 111 00 M O\ CO •o • •� •� Ni vi o N •O •O • •� •N •N N m 3 z M I� M l0 N E Lq O O • •— •M • r n ''RR V 1� V o m •� • Z w =3 o _ "° N o Z t V T C T cO >O C R1 r O g7 � ?N V n J om �W }- / k - k t % \ / \ oo \ - 1 / p _ k ) § ! � ] } , § � ! / � \ / t 5 : 2 ) | _ ar § t5 _ \ \ 2 m m m \\\ \\ \\\ \\\ \ \\\\\ \ \\\ \\ � \) � ` \ \o ) CY FXLED78SF R/o►,3 L Project: Type: North Ridge St A Prepared By: Date: S Elliott 3/4/16 Driver Info LED Info Type: Constant Current Watts: 78W 120V: 0.66A Color Temp: 5100K(Cool) 208V: 0.41A Color Accuracy: 67 CRI 240V: 0.35A L70 Lifespan: 100000 277V: 0.30A Lumens: 7,597 Input Watts: 79W Efficacy: 97 LPW High power,wide distribution LED floodlight.Replaces 250W MH.Patent Pending airflow Efficiency: 99% technology ensures long LED and driver lifespan.Use for building facade lighting,sign lighting,LED landscape lighting and instant-on security lighting. Color:Bronze Weight:24.0 lbs Technical Specifications Listings EPA: Green Technology: UL Listing: 2 Mercury and UV free. Suitable for wet locations.Suitable for ground Ambient Temperature: Optical mounting. IESNA LM-79&LM-80 Testing: Suitable for use in 40°C ambient temperatures. NEMA Type: RAB LED luminaires have been tested by an Cold Weather Starting: NEMA Beam Spread of 6H x 6V independent laboratory in accordance with IESNA LM- The minimum starting temperature is-40°F/-40°C. Replacement Range: 79 and LM-80,and have received the Department of Thermal Management: The FXLED78 can be used to replace 150-320W Energy"Lighting Facts"label. Superior heat sinking with external Air-Flow fins. Metal Halide Floodlights based on delivered lumens. DLC Listed: Housing: Electrical This product is on the Design Lights Consortium(DLC) Driver: Qualified Products List and is eligible for rebates from Die-cast aluminum housing and door frame. DLC Member Utilities. Mounting: Constant Current,Class 2,2000mA,100-277V,50- DLC Product Code:P0000170A 60Hz,1.1A,Power Factor 99% Heavy-duty Slip Fitter for 2 3/8"OD pipe. LED Characteristics THD: Reflector: Lifespan: 5%at 120V,13.1%at 277V Specular vacuum-metallized polycarbonate 100,000-hour LED lifespan based on IES LM-80 Surge Protection: results and TM-21 calculations. Gaskets: 4kV LEDs: High-temperature silicone gaskets. Other Six multi-chip,13Watt high-output,long-life LEDs. Finish: Equivalency: Color Consistent Our environmentally friendly polyester powder coatings y� are formulated for high-durability and long-lasting The FXLED78 is Equivalent in delivered lumens to a 7-step MacAdam Ellipse binning to achieve consistent color,and contains no VOC or toxic heavy metals. 250W Metal Halide. fixture-to-fixture color. California Title 24: Color Stability: See FXLED78SF/D10,FXLED78SF/BL, LED color temperature is warrantied to shift no more FXLED78SF/PCT for a 2013 California Title 24 than 200K in CCT over a 5 year period. compliant product.Any additional component requirements will be listed in the Title 24 section under Color Uniformity: technical specifications on the product page. RAB's range of CCT(Correlated Color Temperature) follows the guidelines of the American National Standard for(SSL)Products,ANSI C78.377-2015. Construction IP Rating: Ingress Protection rating of IP66 for dust and water. Need help?Tech help line:888 RAB-1000 Email:sales@rabweb.com Website:www.rabweb.com Page 1 of 2 Copyright @ 2014 RAB Lighting Inc.All Rights Reserved Note:Specifications are subject to change at any time without notice FXLED78SF L I GRAB Technical Specifications (continued) Other Patents: Warranty: The FXLED78 design is protected by U.S.Pat. RAB warrants that our LED products will be free from D659,280,Canada Pat.143155,China Pat. defects in materials and workmanship for a period of ZL201130443125.9,Mexico Pat.36558 and pending five(5)years from the date of delivery to the end user, patent in Taiwan. including coverage of light output,color stability,driver performance and fixture finish. Dimensions Features 91, 22.9 cm 78 Watt high-performance LED Replaces 250W MH floodlights 100,000 hour life based on LM-80 tests Air-flow technology heatsink 9" 22.9 cm NEMA type-6H x 5V Slipfitter and trunnion mounting available 0 5-year warranty 14" K--35.6 cm Ordering Matrix Family Watts Mount Color Temp Finish Dimming Voltage Photocell Bi-Level FXLED A I I I I I F_� 78=78W =Arm =5000K(Cool) =Bronze =No Dimming =120-277V =No Photocell =No Bi-Level T=Trunnion Y=3000K(Warm) W=White /D10=Dimmable /480=480 Volt /PCT=120-277V Twistlock Photocell /BL=Bi-Level SF=Slipfitter N=4000K(Neutral) /PCT4=480V Twistlock Photocell Need help?Tech help line:888 RAB-1000 Email:sales@rabweb.com Website:www.rabweb.com Page 2 of 2 Copyright @ 2014 RAB Lighting Inc.All Rights Reserved Note:Specifications are subject to change at any time without notice PJXB PS4-11-15WT L IL I G Project: Type: North Ridge St Pole Prepared By: Date: S Elliott 3/4/16 Lamp Info Ballast Info Type: N/A Type: N/A Watts: OW 120V: N/A Shape/Size: N/A 208V: N/A Base: N/A 240V: N/A e ANSI: N/A 277V: N/A " Hours: N/A Input Watts: OW Square steel poles with welded tenon included for use with floodlights.Designed for ground Lamp Lumens: N/A mounting.Poles are stocked nationwide for quick shipment.Protective packaging ensures Efficacy: N/A poles arrive at the job site good as new. Color:Bronze Weight:134.0 lbs Technical Specifications Listings Height: Weight: CSA Listed: 15 FT 134 lbs. Suitable for wet locations. Gauge: Anchor Bolt: Construction 11 Galvanized anchor bolts and galvanized hardware and Shaft: Wall Thickness: anchor bolt template.All bolts have a 3"hook. 46,000 p.s.i.minimum yield. 1/811Anchor Bolt Templates: Hand Holes: Shaft Size: WARNING Template must be printed on 11"x 17" sheet for actual size.CHECK SCALE BEFORE Reinforced with grounding lug and removable cover. 4". USING.Templates shipped with anchor bolts and Base Plates: Hand Hole Dimensions: available. Slotted base plates 36,000 p.s.i. 3"x 5". Pre-Shipped Anchor Bolts: Shipping Protection: Bolt Circle: Bolts can be pre-shipped upon request for additional freight charge. All poles are shipped in individual corrugated cartons 8 1/2" to prevent finish damage. MaxEPA's/Max Weights: Base Dimension: Color: 70MPH 14.0 ft_/400 Ib 8 80MPH 10.2 ft /295 Ib Bronze powder coating. 90MPH 7.6 ft_/220 Ib Tenon: 10OMPH 5.6 ft_/165 Ib Welded 2 3/8"tenon included. 110MPH 4.2 ft /ft Ib 120MPH 3.0 ft_/95 95 l Ib 130MPH 2.1 ft_/70 Ib 140MPH 1.4 ft /50 Ib 150MPH 0.8 ft—/35 Ib. Other Terms of Sale: Pole Terms of Sale is available. Need help?Tech help line:888 RAB-1000 Email:sales@rabweb.com Website:www.rabweb.com Page 1 of 2 Copyright©2014 RAB Lighting Inc.All Rights Reserved Note:Specifications are subject to change at any time without notice PJXB PS4-11-15WT L IL I G Dimensions Features 2 30' Designed for ground mounting Gauge-ti Heavy duty TGIC polyester coating Reinforced hand holes with grounding lug and removable cover for easy wiring access Anchor Bolt Kit includes hand hole cover and base cover(sold separately) 4" - Custom manufactured for each application 15' Hal 1 hole 18 314" 1 Need help?Tech help line:888 RAB-1000 Email:sales@rabweb.com Website:www.rabweb.com Page 2 of 2 Copyright @ 2014 RAB Lighting Inc.All Rights Reserved Note:Specifications are subject to change at any time without notice � N M O 11') O_ O_ II OII O OJ ZOO W� .[1 L) to W mi W W W 00 1H013H 30021 NV3W „8-,6ZLLJ x U z O ' w o "LL '9 N z �Wo w w w w w ww W = wo w ;9wy Om wo d ww �2-, z '0, a S Y'mo w JZ = Z co Of ® ® N oaf a ® W No H U W Y O O ww r a W Z O C)0 W O Q S S OU J_ N v> �o m N a Z o O w > �i M E�-'zow WlU)W WwZ ® 0a 010,>- QOWo Q lo W < Q+'Www N �o� xwgw � Q�� ® ® w ® z EHEHz o� ao -J wm � o - - - - - - - - - - ILE s N N� ® ® N ® O I _II M O O N 11 Oil tzia t< �W MW 1H013H 300b Nb3W „8-,6Z ollE- -,9 z „ill-.6 a o w o p m = oo w OwJ 0 Ow mN m mli N] rn wF� O W m CJ Wim^O ® ® z w=.o Q Y W Y W J Z�0 Z �OaU LO Q ffiEHJ IF�3Fiii-I cNo�H U Y f N oa WZ 0 Zw =c) J o0 miNa ® o I ® :II w Y wN O M ISI Y E-ZOW �r 1 IM V z Q W O ® J /Q/y� aOU F+ �--� y W W W ® xwgw o � Of LLLJ z 1 z N O O J J:D w m ® ® S M ® p D N� N O I _II M O O N NDO'OOHVA®HOWNHO A?10A AU •-11Nn00 831S3HO1S3M ONIMlne 9029 969(4901 LA'N'NO3NOJb6 1 Nb OA M3N'83LS3HO id0d )400219 3A21 AO 30tlMIA 3nN3AV S31I1S ZZ9 JJ'�1`. d0'I'301aA'3HQ ZLZt�'I y's S�`lolla H,L2IOH NoiivaNnoi N N a Z��,LIH�2IV 2I3�HI2If13N }RI�I� E W F W U' A a x E- 1=fx O z F ISd 000£ L---, „0-,OL IVOIAdl'1 AL;7M.-'M„4Z SDNIl00d-- ——————— ---------- -g IW m II I- m Al 1 Elf �I Z llNn ONIAn 01 do -� IiI DNIOD S21IV1S 30 3NII r W of O 0_ -- U zLLJ �1 � 01 $ N LLI �I m w e m z _ z1 ! J zJ L-------------------------------------- ------ "t� m ISd o-,z L I I I 1 �I z cn w �I m 8 - a al 0 0 U .£-.Vt llNn ONIAII 01 do ON100 S21IV1S 30 3NII z �I S qlI w �` z w LVOUdl_1.OL x'M,bZ SDNI1003 .I ----------- --------- -----J m , a r IVOIAdl'1,0L-'M,4 SONLOW -Iv ('dA1)DMIOD3 30 3Nn n Im D' 'I. Z ON100 S11V1S d0 3NII W 11Nn ONNn Ol do .0-,£ W m SF-.sL UOno ¢ 1 -- z0- NI l 0 S w ml :2Ld F1 �I m o l g $ 1 M7 w w I I w L—�V IAdl'1„N X'M,bZ SONIUOOd -I J ----------------------------------- ------ m m �aoor : ----IVOIAdl'1„Ol x'M„bZ SONIl00d —————————————————————— ------Z—� _� ,0-,z ('.LU)ON1100d d0 3NII 7S” N I I I wcn 1 1•m aof mI C) 0 U f x Hm n ANn ONNI 01 do n ONIOD SHINES 30 3Nn Z 4 I m L--- ----------'— ------- ---------� ISd 000E ISd 000£ 0 L-----------------------------------------------------J 7 .o-,o L „a-,ab NOO'OOHVA®HOWNHO A?10A AU lLNn00 831S3HO1S3M ONIanlne 9029 969(4901 LA'N'NO3NOJb6 1 Nb OA M3N'83LS3HO id0d )400219 3A21 j0 30tlMIA 3nN3nv s311is zzs LYI1 a0I3oaA3HQozLZYI J1 SR`lolla HL2IOH NoildaNnoi N N N e Z��,LIH�2IV 2I3�HI2If13N }RI�I� E W F W U' A a x E- 1=fx O z F ISd 000£ L IVOUd1 .01 «b x 'MZSDNI1003 ,0-OL i '1 IW Q I I I- z 11N11 ONIAn 01 do -m W ONI00 S21IVLl 30 3NII r WLi T Ua xl _J Zoo_ I -- t c> z LdLd o �I m zJL-------------------------------------- ------� m o-,z L I I I I ml zZ. Ld o NI m 8 1 U a F---J ;p U� o �r U LNn ONLAII 01 do ONI00 SHIVLS 30 3NII Vi w LVOUdl_1„OL x'M.VZ SONI1003 ----------- ---------=-------J m , - - - isa ooaf - - I a IVOIAdl'1,N-'M.* SONILOOd du)ONI1003 30 3Nn Im z ONI00 SdViS do 3Nn j W 11Nn ONINI 01 do W vi $ W O q�y U¢ L-- zo NI l o S wui � I � FI lw ul �I m o l g $ z I I w I I w L--1_ Udl'1.01 'M„bZ SONIl00d -IJ ----------------------------------- ------ m Saoor --, _____ _ L---l� ----IVOIAdl'1„Ol x'M„bZ SONLLOOd ---------- -------- ------Z—� -I ONI1003 30 3NII 2S” N I I I WLi LLJ aI I I 0 U f x Hm ✓� 1INn ONINI 01 do N m Of 0N100 SNIVLS 30 3Nn L--- ----------'- a --- -- ---------� ISd OOOf ISd OODf 0 L-----------------------------------------------------J T Ralph G . Mastromonaco , PE , PC 0 4 T 8 \ L v� o -i / o � rn 7U '$ o � rn . s � / n o 7 I 1 rn rn j goo rn z 41k oFna o rn 711 � rn rn f �. z °1� Y Y Ralph G . Mastromonaco , PE , PC 0 4 T S \ L7�1 rn ' 7U �� '$ o � I) 7U / rn C: . s V / s �0D �O r o� rn rn � rn D u > a / o C A co 0 o � rn rn �f z °1� Y Y L) w 01) H O 00 L) 1H013H 300a Nb3W l L-,SZ C lL-,6 o w x w 9-8 7j�p0 w o -p x o- o w 0� P= aYTQwz�o O nU- N M JZU Z �0 c) InQ�Q i N m m Z W No m C) w Y NN a �o o ww Z 00 �w w =� Q 0_ OU LV � LV -O Na w Y W o EZOw O U)WmyZy Z o Qr O ra-,p 04 wU O �W a xwgw V) w z ® z U- U Q 0 a J J� UJ m o ® S � o i M O O N W0O'OOHVA®H08VNHO MIOA M3N'AINf107 831S3H0Ls3M �Nla�ll IO I = 9OZ8 869(*16)J LONS' NO3N0 6)i NNOA M3N'83153HO RJOd NOOJ8 3Aa JO 30V-nIA L VI 30N3AV S31ILS ZZ9 133815 30021 H-LnOS LIZ o II m 109ZIHOHV HHONIZIM XHVgD d,Y awd0'ImQ zzvII IMIS 9mH WHOM N0llb/�313 � � o lei E 12 [rW E W � o z 1HO13H 3OO?J NV3W ,LL-9Z „0-,8 „L L-,9 z „F L-,6 0 z Ig o- o w o� 0 0 -LL 00 JN 2 JLC r Z J OD Z o 9-71 II 'Q J W Z - - - - - - - - - OfN s 1H013H AMI NV3W „ll—,SZ E- L) W o 0—8 bl l—,6 00 Ld �Z lal QQ „ll-8,9 aO �oozW U o JU = zZZW lal z� am J N JU S J li w LO O y U F� Z}NO o0 0 COC)Ol W LLJ w _JZ = qc) Z Cj n Q q Q W cNo�HU Y a � C) Nw a wz o� �w w =� ® N Q 0_ OU N OH Z N o J F W Y Z W C>) Y E- 0 E—zow F- �WmZ 0 W Q�lC) -'Www � xwgw ® O GHQ>U LL. zN Z N O O J J� w m � o Q N N O R O M O m o 00 � N o . C, 11 ME 04 zo 25 L) t;Ed w 01) E00 1H013H 30021 NV3W „8-,6Z x U cDME 6 0 Ma ME, o v � � O ME Ow 03 CD m zz z z� zW Z ZZ"0o x Y'0 r w Jz = Z �--OaU ® ® N oaf a ® W No H U w Y O �w r a W Z U �W Z ww S� O Q S S oU J_ N v> tIQ �o m N a Z o O w > E�-'zow ® ® W �WmZ ® wUa>-z � QOWo N �o� xwgw E—=>= =>=' ® z z ajo� ao wm � o s ILE N N� JE[fl ® N ® O I _II M O O N s 1H013H AMI NV3W „ll—,SZ E- L) W o 0—8 bl l—,6 00 Ld �Z lal QQ „ll-8,9 aO �oozW U o JU = zZZW lal z� am J N JU S J li w LO O y U F� Z}NO o0 0 COC)Ol W LLJ w _JZ = qc) Z Cj n Q q Q W cNo�HU Y a � C) Nw a wz o� �w w =� ® N Q 0_ OU N OH Z N o J F W Y Z W C>) Y E- 0 E—zow F- �WmZ 0 W Q�lC) -'Www � xwgw ® O GHQ>U LL. zN Z N O O J J� w m � o Q N N O R O M O m o 00 � N o . C, 11 ME 04 zo 25 L) t;Ed w 01) E00 1H013H 30021 NV3W „8-,6Z x U cDME 6 0 Ma ME, o v � � O ME Ow 03 CD m zz z z� zW Z ZZ"0o x Y'0 r w Jz = Z �--OaU ® ® N oaf a ® W No H U w Y O �w r a W Z U �W Z ww S� O Q S S oU J_ N v> tIQ �o m N a Z o O w > E�-'zow ® ® W �WmZ ® wUa>-z � QOWo N �o� xwgw E—=>= =>=' ® z z ajo� ao wm � o s ILE N N� JE[fl ® N ® O I _II M O O N W0J'OOHVA®H0dVNH0 MIOA M3N'AWf100 83153110153M °� �. �JNla�ll SOZS 869(;£450L CO N8'NO3NOUL IS tl% N210A M3N'i13153H0 lii0d NyNaNaoI��Q HIS H9f1omi o z o 3f1NRI 531IL5 ZZ9 133>J15 39021 HII v IMIS xamH HIHOx N0003S SS0�0 ia9�axV xHOwanxrc x�a ,�ar�ao�Ma zzvz E [rW E W �T� gEIII - T lull-Mi II MOMMffi MMR, =ITIT, ., IEIII=III=ID=u rau=w=lrl- �IT�IT=ITS I=III�TI�TI=iI O mlll=lll=lll=u o ILII=III=III= eieilll� �I-ueieil-li Z amll o lmlWm 11-111-11 11 s =II� Tml l I MINE nl I I�PER,- �I Im--m� r�ml�l���- $ ill it III-lu=l o f-I M =IIm m ml I=IIIII� � m=mi WE II IIIIII _ II= m 1 11 III-III-III T T HE Ti II=I111 TI Hill IE II-III T 1 HEIIIA] �TIWLi TIll IIS HIIII=III=IIIA1 SII=I�I�II= I IIII�iWl�l� III w w AMER, I. n I I II�TWITi�l�1 8{{1I-I�il-��m _ � IIg=Wlil�l�u 2 IIWIIII r Oq �IIi�IIIIIll LL a ��u'�E N O W-�W- o �IIII IRS IWI�III olri-lueieill-1 (' zi ='�11�TW111�� Z 3F��ITi�II�T�l1im T Wlil Z mi Z Z iiml l OII II O HIM i l ml 5 -m-9 m U iall=m=lie m U =III.9 W =o ielil-II W -m_ rlall=ul=re N I ml�iml? II- lili: (n M��m---�i (n =II U) l lml�lElllm V) Allimf0S < UN1-9111911-- UN e Il = IIE e il lum sm 'mmi'I'�=mn=i _ _ I'M 0 I__I IIS lilml M ,W,o I I IT 11 Hill II Ilb'lllIII llllll_ IIII IIIm I IIS II-III-II li mN-UM �I��W-III-III= _ Mill 111111 111111111111 sm III- -,WIli�II I_�u_=I BT HE I �lulMITI� �g i--=IIImo'�ll��II�--�EIII�w-wIlI=-��IImEIIII'II=-��IIammEIIII'II=--��IImEIIIIII 'II II- -i�IIIL =�IuI-II--uII a IWl�l�l�ll-u�-I-�il m I -�� I -�m�llrerere u=w=II=IY= liewdudlr-lieiel w- p �= MEE-w-W-m-Lm-ITM_�l l�il II-III-IIS AME I II -SII =_EIIE =IT-�11�iI=IT II-IIk IiiI�II�ITINIIII o _ - i. II w-ITI-III-II L :o - TIT=ITI�il=ue IeITI=C o¢` II�II�TImTWIImTi�u III lip RELF lw mu=m=rIl=m=ilmilml JMRutLFEtLFmm IISIi=E=EIIlL11 L III �LIomt - MO' A WI Ig tLFtLFA M OM =-u EU11 EII g eoe rrr m_Imm l m lrr��mm- III I I I1 I I E11_Ill�l l l-�l lEUEIIrll11rl=rllll�rl1H III =u =ul= r_Er_Eul� uE 'I �4r�rr�m� IIS 111 11111M.110 mg-illlal= mErl I II�L illil�l�il=_I mll l=_I mr l�l'm VIII: ONE l 11-111011-111-115111 ml 0 l T T HE Iml�-rr�rr�m=�I I HE I-III-IIEI I= _mom llimllimlli =m=gym= mlTil�rrml�Ynl� it mn=m-5H 11 111 l 1111-II 1- -III III II I 1111111111111-111111111-IgII E� 11 Dolph Rotfeld Engineering, P.C. M E M O TO: VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK PLANNING BOARD CHAIRMAN ROBERT GOODMAN FROM: Dolph Rotfeld, P.E. SUBJECT: North Ridge Street Residential Development SUBDIVISION AND SITE PLAN APPLICATION DATE: December 23, 2015 With regard to the above mentioned project, this office has received and reviewed the following: 1. Preliminary Stormwater Report prepared by Ralph G. Mastromonaco, P.E., P.C. Consulting Engineers, dated October 19, 2015; 2. Plans prepared by Ralph G. Mastromonaco, P.E., P.C. Consulting Engineers, dated October 27, 2015 (Lot 3) and October 28, 2015 (North Ridge Street Development, Lot 2 and Fair Affordable Housing); 3. Wetland Delineation and Functional Assessment prepared by Tim Miller Associates, Inc., dated October 26, 2015. It is understood that the plans and reports that have been submitted are "preliminary" and in some cases conceptual. Therefore, it is recommended that subsequent applications include more detail as per the Village of Rye Brook Zoning Code, Chapter 209, "Site Plan Review". Please see below for issue(s) pertaining to the conceptual plans submitted: 1. A copy of the survey of existing conditions must be submitted with site topography. 2. A proposed subdivision plan must be provided. 3. Runoff calculations must utilize the newly-NYSDEC-adopted "Extreme Precipitation" rainfall depths compiled by Northeast Regional Climate Center (NRCC) and Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS): httr)://r)recip.eas.cornell.edu/. 4. A pretreatment device for water quality and maintenance must be provided immediately upstream of any piped connection to infiltration units. Please include installation and material details. At a minimum the device must include a sump and a hooded outlet. Rye Brook Site Plan Review— North Ridge Street Residential Development December 23, 2015 Page 2 of 2 5. Since an infiltration practice is proposed percolation tests must be performed. The tests must be done in conformance with "Stormwater Management, Westchester County, NY, Best Management Practices Manual Series", or other accepted method. Notification must be made to this office for inspection. Test logs must be submitted for review demonstrating conformance with methodology used (24 hour soak, uniform percolation rates, proper depth). The locations of the percolation tests must be shown on the plan. Per Westchester County BMP, percolation tests must be performed at a depth of 6" below the bottom of each proposed infiltration practice. Percolation tests must be performed even if no percolation volume is considered. 6. Wherever infiltration practices are proposed test pits must be performed to confirm soil type and to determine the elevation of ledge rock and groundwater conditions (minimum 2 feet below infiltration practices). Test pit locations must be shown on the plan. If the minimum 2 foot separation is not possible, alternative methods to infiltration must be considered. Notification must be made to this office for inspection. 7. An erosion control plan must be provided. Erosion control details must also be provided. 8. A tree removal plan must be submitted with a list of trees to be removed. 9. The proposed area of disturbance must be delineated and quantified on the plan. 10.A sight distance plan must be submitted for each driveway entrance. Plans have not been reviewed by this office for zoning compliance. C: M. Nowak C. Bradbury E. Beane M. Mohamed M. Izzo RH Consulting 297 Knollwood Road, White Plains, NY 10607 (914)997-7200 Fax: (914)997-7201 e-mail: pwmrhyman@verizon.net Richard Hyman,AICP March 16, 2016 TO: Paulding Holdings LLC FROM: Richard Hyman RE: 259 N. Ridge Street Development The proposed development for 259 N. Ridge Street includes 8 two-bedroom affordable townhouses for sale ($200,000-$215,000) and 2 four-bedroom market rate single family houses ($750,000-$1,000,000) in the Blind Brook School District. In order to estimate the number of public school students (pss) to be generated by the proposed development, there are two methodologies that can be utilized. First is the use of generic multipliers developed by extensive research covering large areas. Rutgers University Center for Urban Policy Research has developed multipliers of school age children (sac) and public school age children (psac) by housing type and sales price.* Utilizing the data for New York for two-bedroom affordable townhouses, the multiplier is 0.14 sac per townhouse; for four-bedroom single family houses, the multiplier is 1.05 sac per house (See Table 1). Applying the Blind Brook public school enrollment rate of 92% produces a multiplier of 0.13 psac per two-bedroom affordable townhouse and 0.97 psac per four-bedroom market rate single-family house (See Table 2). This yields a total estimate of 2.98 (say 3) public school children. The second methodology is to utilize data from comparable developments. Cottage Landing Phase II was built in 2012 in the City of Rye and the Rye City Central School District. It includes 10 one-bedroom and 12 two-bedroom affordable sales townhouse. There are no pss *Residential Demographic Multiplier—Estimates of Occupants of New Housing. Paulding Holdings LLC March 16, 2016 Page 2 living in the one-bedroom townhouses and 4 pss living in the 12 two-bedroom townhouses which is a multiplier of 0.33 pss per townhouse. Comstock Heights was built in 2014 in the Village of Briarcliff Manor and the Briarcliff Manor Union Free School District. It includes 14 two-bedroom affordable sales townhouses. There are currently 5 sac living in the two-bedroom townhouses, which is a multiplier of 0.36 sac per unit. For the purpose of this analysis, it is assumed that all school aged children go to the public schools. I previously did a study of new single family market rate houses built in the Town of Yorktown during a four year period. The four-bedroom houses yielded 0.77 pss per house. Applying the multiplier of 0.36 from a comparable two-bedroom townhouse development (which is higher than the Blind Brook adjusted Rutgers multiplier) yields an estimate of 2.88 public school students from the townhouses. To be conservative applying the Blind Brook adjusted Rutgers study multiplier of 0.97 to the two market rate single family houses (which is higher than the Yorktown study) yields an estimate of 1.94 public school students from the houses. In total, it is estimated that the proposed development at 259 N. Ridge Street will generate 4.82 (say 5)public school students. The U.S. Census Bureau's American Community Survey(ACS) 2008-20012 for the Blind Brook School District had about 2,298 occupied housing units which yields about 0.65 public school students per occupied housing unit based on a total enrollment of about 1,500 students. Applying this multiplier to the 10 total units proposed in the 259 N. Ridge Street development yields 6.5 (say 7)public school students. The range of estimates is from 3 to 7 public school children to be generated by the development proposed at 259 N. Ridge Street. Paulding Holdings LLC March 16, 2016 Page 3 Table 1 New York School Age Children (Public School Only) Multiplier for School Aged Total School Tvve of Unit No. of Units Children Per Unit Aged Children Single Family Attached 2-BR 8 0.11 0.88 Value More Than $194,500 Single Family Detached 4-BR 2 0.87 1.74 Value More Than $329,500 Total Public School Aged Children 2.62 Source: Rutgers Center for Urban Policy Research. Table 2 New York All School Age Children (Adjusted Public School Children Based on Blind Brook School District) Multiplier for School Aged Total School Tvve of Unit No. of Units Children Per Unit* Aged Children Single Family Attached 2-BR 8 0.14 x 0.92 = 0.13 1.04 Value More Than $194,500 Single Family Detached 4-BR 2 1.05 x 0.92 = 0.97 1.94 Value More Than $329,500 Total Public School Aged Children 2.98 *Based on Blind Brook School District public school enrollment of 92%. Source: Rutgers Center for Urban Policy Research. Dolph Rotfeld Engineering, P.C. M E M O TO: VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK PLANNING BOARD CHAIRMAN ROBERT GOODMAN FROM: Dolph Rotfeld, P.E. SUBJECT: 3 Edgewood Drive SITE PLAN APPLICATION DATE: February 26, 2016 With regard to the above mentioned project, this office has received and reviewed the following: 1. Plan prepared by Gabriel E. Senor, P.C., dated June 23, 2015, revised February 10, 2016; 2. Memo prepared by Gabriel E. Senor, P.C., undated. Using the same numbering from this office's previous memo (dated February 1, 2016) the following items have not yet been addressed: 1. Per 130-16.B.(3) of the Village code: "Whenever any portion of a floodplain is authorized for development, the volume of space occupied by the authorized fill or structure below the base flood elevation shall be compensated for and balanced by a hydraulically equivalent volume of excavation taken from below the base flood elevation at or adjacent to the development site." Please demonstrate how the application conforms to this requirement of the code. 2. Per 130-16.B.(2)(a) of the Village code: The applicant must demonstrate "that the cumulative effect of the proposed development, when combined with all other existing and future development, will not increase the water surface elevation of the base flood more than one foot at any location." In the analysis please provide the following: a. The datum of the plan's topography; b. The elevation of Acker Drive downstream of the site at the culvert crossing of the East Branch Blind Brook. 3. Per Village code stormwater management must be designed for"total volume storage" in which all runoff captured from impervious surfaces and directed into a catchment system shall be accounted for with no discount or consideration to a predeveloped condition. It does not appear that any effort has been made towards satisfying this requirement. Rye Brook Site Plan Review—3 Edgewood Drive February 26, 2016 Page 2 of 2 5. It is unclear if there are any utilities within the "3' Wide Drainage Easement", please provide more information. Are retaining walls permitted in the easement per the easement agreement? As per the Village of Rye Brook Zoning Code, Chapter 209, "Site Plan Review", please see below for issue(s) that will need response: 1. It is noted that the cut volume of 294 cubic yards recorded on the plan refers to the excavation required for the basement of the proposed house. If the basement is not designed as a flow-through structure then the cut volume cannot be considered in the assessment of net earthwork that is to occur on the site. 2. The HydroCAD report must include analysis of the 1, 10 and 25-year storm events. 1 3. The water quality structure detail must include a hooded outlet. 4. The level spreader must extend the full width of the tributary area that it is designed to discharge and must be installed with its invert at the same elevation throughout. 5. It is unclear where the drains along the western property line are designed to discharge as the lowest invert elevation is below any grade on the property. Plans have not been reviewed by this office for zoning compliance. C: M. Nowak M. Mohamed C. Bradbury M. Izzo E. Beane BuildingPermit Check List & ZoninAnalysis SBL•' 6 o Address• ( `— Const.Type: Other: Zone: j - l � Use• 1 YP Submittal Date: t'L l 3 j i S Revisions Submittal Dates: Z 'Z Applicant: i eL C Na S 19 fL> Awa�7 0 tJ' 1 Nature of Work: r � Re-dews:ZBA' FEB 2 6 1016 PB: BP' Other: OK BP: C/O: Legalization: ( ( ) FEES:Filing: Z_S= SB ✓ H.O.A.Approval: ( ) (. APP.: Date Stamped: ✓ ProperlY Signed: ✓ L Verified: PP Water Review: Street Opening: Wetlands: Storm Scenic Roads: Steep Slopes: Z S,� N/A: ( ) (vY ENVIRO.:Long: Short: ✓ Fees• 3ZS� other: To o: Site Protection: S/W Mgmt.: Tree P an: ( ) (• SITE PLAN: p - Current: ,/ Archival:—Sealed: ✓ Unacceptable ( ) (,y SURVEY:Dated: t ,� Co ies: Incomplete• N/A: Oth� PLANS:Date Stamped: ./ Baled: P other. Workers Comp: Liability: Comp.Waiver: N/A: ( ) License: Dated: CODE 753#: pmt; N/A: Other' (,,� ( ) HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRICAL:Plans: N/A: Other: ( ) ( ) LOW-VOLTAGE ELECTRICAL:Plans: Permit: ORS:Plans: N/A: Other. FIRE ALARM/SMOKE DETECT Permit: Other: pmt• Nat.Gas: LP Gas: (� ( ) PLUMBING:Plans: N/A: Other: ( ) ( ) FIRE SUPPRESSION:Plans: Permit: ( ) H.V.A.C.: Plans: Permit: N/A: Other' ( ) ply: pmt• Fuel Type: Other. ( ) ( ) FUEL TANK: . o�� 0/ ( ) 2010 NY State ECCC: N/A: Final Survey: Final Topo: (a/ ( ) RAPE Sign-off Letter: As-Built Plans: Other: BC/O DENIAL LEITER: Other: P DENIAL LETTER: Other: -f"26-�"i rzf�' (rmtg.date: approve notes: app roval: notes: tg.date: notes: (,OB mtg.date: approval: REQUIRED EXISTING PROPOSED NOTES Area: I S k ,00 _ Circle: I OV ' Fronta e• 79' — Front Front: d o 3 H 7.g LSO 20 G .CL�4� G.4'�ati'i11� ,ra GpnAS�. �— -rlffln� ALL Sides: (s /'f o on Rear. o Z ^ ,S' Z,sT ne z ann. n+Rw w9ti1. ok, z S9 20 C, i 21 1 ��, .tao zo G CzVs� i , 2 � Z51D- o.G, (z: reMainCov: z !nIln- TO �Lif AccsCov �Z-3 ZSo -Zo-1. 07, T• Ft.H/Sb: ,�{3 ,4 Sd.H/Sb: � — .� SSzo_ .E -3 l G GFA 3= tail o. Zr 3 S� t sat 3t?�— 60'7! Tot.ImU' _ Ft.Imp: Z'! Oar, ParteZ:' Z. Heieht/Stories=02- —�` notes: BUILD MENT VILA ,F;O�+R OK 938 KnvGIt` `' NY 10573 (914)9 5 9 39-5801 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD CHECK LIST FOR APPLICANTS This form must be completed and signed by the applicant of record and a copy shall be . submitted to the Building Department prior to attending the ARB meeting. Applicants failing to submit a copy of this check list will be removed from the ARB agenda. Job Address: 6 P40DO Cr_ 100A0 Phone# A t 4)ZZ 5-0 Parcel ID#: 135. 34-1 -ZZ Zone: 0—I$ Date of Submission: Proposed Improvement(Describe in detail): APPLICANT CHECK LIST: The following items must be submitted to the Building Department with the application-no exceptions. 1. ( )Completed Application Iw ' 2. ( )Eight(8)sets of sealed plans. (Max.size 36".,42')Property Owner: jema� �i�t.Q�14 N�lltl�ll£ W3. ( )Eight(8)copies of the property survey. Address: G PAV-00cf- Romp 4. ( )Eight(8)copies of the proposed site plan. 5. ( )One electronic/disc copy of the complete Phone# 646) Zfi`)— 3 5 application materials. Applicant appearing before the Board: 6. ( )Filing Fee. J014A 7. ( )Any supporting documentation. 8. ( )HOA approval letter. (if applicable) Address: 33 Ajr,4h►1d lill.L 1261V A- 4,(OAjk- lqv 9. ( )Photographs. /� j0,504, 10.( )Samples of finishes/color chart. (a sample board or Phone# ('01 14)ZZ 3—•73 y-o model may be presented the night of the meeting) Architect/Engineer: J6 f-44 6 5CAL,A-Tb /y- By signature below, the owner/applicant acknowledges that he/she has read the complete Building Permit Instructions&Procedures,and that their application is complete in all respects.The Board of Review reserves the right to refuse to hear any application not meeting the requirements contained herein. ? Swom to before me this Z Swom to before me this 2 day of 044044ti��W , 20 day ofQi( , 207— signature o ty ALfAfp:�p—fi—t���� 1Cwt ANP4 6 2s� A t Name of Property Owner Print Name of Applicant e r _ Notary Public Notary Public PETER J.CHO NOTARY LIC, STATE OF NEW YORK NO. 01 CH6308766 M AME YELLON NOTARYPUHII STATE CFNEWYORK M QUALIFIED IN WESTCHESTER COUNTY, NESICHE n +YEs2�ae+s' MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JULY 28,201 COMM.EXP 2/10/2015 • This form must be properly completed & notarized by the Design Professional of record and the Property Owner. Failure to provide this completed form with your permit application will delay the permitting process. Notice of Utilization of Truss Type, Pre-Engineered Wood, or Timber Frame Construction. Title 19 Part 1264 & 1265 NYCRR To: The Building Inspector of the Village of Rye Brook. From: —'_10�)n 6 S C0.r K,'-� "NL- evt- Subject Property: K P'qO pyc.K dZa ab SBL: 13 S, 3-1-/-ZZZone: R-I-" Please take notice that the subject;)KOne or Two Family; ❑ Commercial, ❑ New Structure ❑ Addition to an Existing Structure ZZ❑ Rehabilitation to an Existing Structure to be constructed or performed at the subject property will utilize; op❑ Truss Type Construction(TT)'Pre-Engineered Wood Construction(PW) ❑ Timber Construction(TC) in the following location(s); Floor Framing, including Girders&Beams (F) ❑ Roof Framing(R) ❑ Floor Framing and Roof Framing(FR) Please note that prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy, the subject dwelling or building utilizing truss type, pre-engineered wood,or timber construction must be posted with a Truss Identification Sign, installed in conformance with NYCRR§1264 for Commercial Buildings, and NYCRR§1265 for One&Two ili>ellin d� ZI 2 a l 16 al,n G Scq.*- a Design Professional Date pew Date Notary Public SHARI MELILLO Notary Public,State of New York No.01 ME6160063 Oualftied In Westchester County Commission Expires January 29.20 t-�yE BR � J ll! tc444.u o�v VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK MAYOR 938 King Street, Rye Brook, N.Y. 10573 ADMINISTRATOR Paul S. Rosenberg (914)939-0668 Fax(914)939-5801 Christopher J. Bradbury www.rvebrook.org TRUSTEES BUILDING&FIRE Susan R.Epstein INSPECTOR David M. Heiser Michael J. Izzo Jason A. Klein Jeffrey B. Rednick NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL Application#16-010 March 1,2016 Jonathan Yellon &Marcie Meehan 6 Paddock Road Rye Brook,New York 10573 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that your revised application for building permit dated February 26, 2016, for the premises located at 6 Paddock Road,Parcel ED# 13534-1-22,has been disapproved because of non-compliance with the following section(s)of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook: 1. 4250-20.G.(1): The minimum required front yard setback is 40 feet. The existing garage permitted in 1955 was constructed 38.4 feet from the front lot line. 2. 6250-20.G.(2)(a): The minimum required single side yard setback is 15 feet. The existing garage permitted in 1955 was constructed 8.1 feet from the side lot line. 3. 6250-20.G.(2)(b): The minimum required total of two side yards setback is 40 feet. The existing garage permitted in 1955 was constructed resulting in a total of two side yards setback of 17.3 feet. 4. &250-20.G.((2)(a): The minimum required single side yard setback is 15 feet. The existing wood deck constructed without a permit sits 9.1 feet from the side lot line. 5. 6250-20.G.(2)(b): The minimum required total of two side yards setback is 40 feet. The existing deck constructed without a permit resulted in a total of two side yards setback of 18.3 feet. 6. 6250-20.G.(2)(b): The minimum required total of two side yards setback is 40 feet. The applicant's proposed 2°d story addition will result in a total of two side yards setback of 38.5 feet. 7. 6250-20.I.0): The maximum allowable front height setback ratio is .60. The applicant's proposed 2nd story addition will result in a front height setback ratio of.623. 8. 6250-20142): The maximum allowable side height setback ratio is 1.60. The applicant's proposed 2nd story addition will result in a side height setback ratio of 2.04. 9. 6250-20.E.: The maximum allowable gross floor area is 3,228 sq. ft. The applicant's proposed additions will result in a gross floor area of 3,589 sq.ft. Please revise your plans to fully comply with the applicable section(s) of Village Code, or an appeal to this decision may be brought before the Village Zoning Board of Appeals(ZBA)in accordance with§250-13 and§250-40 of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook.Applications to appear before the ZBA are available at the Building Department or online at www.rvebrook.org. S' r is 1 0 Buildin Fire Inspector mizzo(@Eyebrook.org BUILDING ARTMENT VILn69-5801 OK REVISED DEC 3 0 ���� 938 KING NY io APPLICAT��,pppp�� VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK (914)9r�6 2 6 1016 BUILDING DEPARTMENT DATED: ' 1982 ' FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: Approval Date: Permit# :Application # Approval Signature: : ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD: Disapproved: :Date: BOT Approval Date: Case # :Chairman: PB Approval Date: Case # :Secretary: ZBA Approval Date: Case # Other: Application Fee ermit Fees: Exterior Building Permit Application Application dated: is hereby made to the Building Inspector of the Village of Rye Brook,NY,for the issuance of a Permit for the construction of buildings,structures,additions,alterations or for a change in use,as per detailed statement described below. 1. JobAddress• A p4VD O6,r- V-0A) 2. Parcel ID#: (35, 3+-1-ZZ- Zone: �� 5 3. Proposed Improvement(Describe in detail): TWO e 5014 A M Tj oO 13i wwN 1*15-D O 4AIZ1iG4C f Hlist Roof, t 5api ib 5" AmoiT1orq Bve- F wr FLaue- Flkv0 f- 1`I ACT 0L0c;<- N Cw r!:�±N,T l2o?aO 4- VAZ- pyo +-Le4 A L L 7,-A-y o N o r- 4 a-aA,;C 4. PropertyOwner: J6 MA'fF" k 1NA?44E `1 t%,W Address:—& VkV1V0&'( rL-VA-D Phone# Cell I-3 54- e-mail )V4l e-d t W4944MV#10541 rGern List All Other Properties Owned in Rye Brook: Applicant: 1 NL,l 6 S-CA9- AThJtL Address: 33 B Y Wcr4 6 1 LL tzeAig "o 0 L 9\46 50 q Phone# `14)7,73--7356 Cell# 6°414)-714-aisz a-mailS65CAU. lD 4M�9/L.(orh Architect: JrAT E-, k5 /t`ePL1.C./*91- Address• Phone# Cell# e-mail Engineer: Address: Phone# Cell# e-mail General Contractor: Address: Phone# Cell# e-mail (1) 2/4/2015 5. Occupancy;(1-Fam.,2-Fain.,CommerciaL,etc...)Pre-construction: I EIM Post-construction: 1 �iit--r•�1 6. Area of lot: Square feet: 156 51, (o Acres: 53 7. Dimensions from proposed building or structure to lot lines: front yard: 38. 4- —rearyard: �6 ¢ right side yard: °( 7-- left side yard: C, 1 other: 8. If building is located on a corner lot,which street does it front on: 9. Area of proposed building in square feet: Basement: 1'`fl: ZI 23.452°d fl: [W1-Z$ 3'd fl: O 10. Total Square Footage of the proposed new construction: 11. For additions,total square footage added: Basement: O 1"fl: Z 13 2°d fl: 142 - 3`d fl: d 12. Total Square Footage of the proposed renovation to the existing structure: 0.Z5, 13. N.Y.State Construction Classification: _V�- N.Y.State Use Classification: 14. Construction Type&Location:(Apical Tstern Lumber Frame;()Timber Frame[TC];()Wood Truss[TT]; (t/Pre-engineered wood[PW];Located;0 Floor Framing[F];()Roof Framing[R];()Floor&Roof Framing[FR]; Other: 15. Number of stories: Z— Overall Height: Median Height: S I 16. Basement to be full,or partial: 5 U,4 . finished or unfinished: 17. What material is the exterior finish: A i"l E Q A-POvAX-0 18. Roof style;peaked,hip,mansard,shed,etc: Roofing material: 770(3e�; 19. What system of heating:_ go WMIL 20. If private sewage disposal is necessary,approval by the Westchester County Health Department must be submitted with this application. 21. Will the proposed project require the installation of a new,or an extension/modification to an existing automatic fire suppression system?(Fire Sprinkler,ANSL System,FM-200 System,Type I Hood,etc...)Yes:_No:_ (if yes,applicant must submit a separate Automatic Fire Suppression System Permit application&2 sets of detailed engineered plans) 22. Will the proposed project disturb 400 sq.ft.or more of land,or create 400 sq.ft.or more of iervious coverage requiring a Stormwater Management Control Permit as per§217 of Village Code? Yes: 1/ No:_Area: 23. Will the roposed project require a Site Plan Review by the Village Planning Board as per§209 of Village Code? Yes: 7 No: (if yes,applicant must submit a Site Plan Application,&provide detailed drawings) 24. Will the proposed project require a Steep Slopes Permit as per§213 of Village Code Yes: No: (ifyes,you must submit a Site Plan Application,&provide a detailed topographical survey) 25. Is the lot located within 100 ft.of a Wetland as per§245 of Village Code? Yes: No: (f yes,the area of wetland and the wetland buffer zone must be properly depicted on the survey&site plan) 26. Is the lot or any portion thereof located in a Flood Plane as per the FIRM Map dated 9/28/07? Yes: No: (f yes,the area and elevations of the flood plane must be properly depicted on the survey&site plan) 27. Will the proposed project require a Tree Removal Permit as per§235 of Village Code?Yes: No: (if yes,applicant must submit a Tree Removal Permit Application) 28. Does the proposed project involve a Home-Occupation as per§250-38 of Village Code? Yes: No: V/ Indicate:TIER I: TIER II: TIER III: ('lyes,a Home Occupation PermitApplication is required) 29. What is the total estimated cost of construction: $ Note:estimated cost shall include all site improvements,labor,material,scaffolding,fcred equipment,professional fees,including any material and labor which may be donated gratis.If the final cost exceeds the estimated cost,an additional fee will be required prior to issuance of the CIO. 30. Estimated date of completion: (2) 2/4/2015 BUILDING DEPARTMENT VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK 938 KING STREET RYE BROOK,NY 10573 (914)939-0668 FAX(914)939-5801 RESIDENTIAL LOT AREA COVERAGE Address: G Pr OeX-lG Section: I3S• 34 Block: I Lot: 27- PERMITTED COVERAGE RATIOS IN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS (Local Law 3-88) YOUR ZONE AREA IN MAIN ACCESS. DECK ZONE DISTRICT SQ. FEET BLDG. BLDG. MAX. CHECK MAX. R-25 25,000 14% 3.5% 4% R-20 20,000 14% 3.5% 4% R-15 15,000 16% 3.5% 4% R-1 5A 15,000 12% 1 3.5% 4% R-12 12,500 17% 4% 4% R-10 10,000 20% 4.5% 3.5% R-7 7,500 23% 4.5% 3.5% R-5 5,000 30% 5% 3.5% R-2F 5,000 30% f 5% 3.5% Existina: Proposed: 1. AREA OF LOT 15-0 51• e Sq. Ft. I S O Sl. 6 Sq. Ft. 2. AREA OF HOUSE a. Coverage of Main Building (Including Attached Garage or Accessory Building) 10. 2-SSq. Ft. .1-5 Sq. Ft. b. Area of 1 at Floor Divided By Area of Lot x 100 Z• % 44 o 1 3. AREA OF ACCESSORY BUILDING (Includes Detached Garages,Tool Shed, Playhouses) 0 Sq. Ft. 0 Sq. Ft. a. Coverage of Accessory Building Area of Accessory Building Divided By Area of Lot x 100 0 % d % 4. AREA OF DECK 4 (O Sq. Ft. 33 Sq. Ft. a. Coverage of Deck Area of Deck Divided By Area of Lot x 100 3 % % I attest to the best of my knowledge and belief,the above information is correct. 9 chitect's Si e (3) 2/10/2015 BUILDING DEPARTMENT VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK 938 KING STREET RYE BROOK,NY 10573 (914) 939-0668 Fax(914) 939-5801 IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE RATIOS RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS Address: (e PA"DDoL1- Rt04V Section: (35. 34- Block: I Lot: ZZ Zone: F— /5-IMPERVIOUS SURFACES (Definition): All buildings, as defined herein, and all areas on the ground or elevated above the ground which are comprised of materials through which water cannot readily flow, including, but not limited to asphalt, concrete, masonry, wood, gravel and clay, and which consist of elements including, but not limited to, court yards, sports courts,swimming pools,patios, sidewalks,ramps,terraces and driveways. TOTAL MAXMTM PERMITTED MAX. PERMITTED COVERAGE Zoning IMPERVIOUS LOT AREA BY IMPERVIOUS SURFACES District COVERAGE INFRONT (sq.fl.) For Base Lot For Lot Area YARD(%) Area(sq.ft.)* Over Base R-25 20 Lot Area(%) R-20 30 0 to 4,000 0 55 R-15 35 4,001 to 6,000 2,200 35 6,001 to 12,000 2,900 27 R 15A 35 12,001 to 16,000 4,520 26 R-12 40 16,001 to 20,000 5,560 25 R-10 45 20,001 to 30,000 6,560 24 30,001 to 40,000 8,960 23 R-7 40 40,001 &larger 11,260 22 R-5 30 R2-F 30 *"Base Lot Area" is the minimum end of the lot size range in the"Lot Area"column Area of lot: 157 0 5-1 . b sq.ft. Existing Allowed Proposed S Total impervious coverage = 1� S .ft. 313 S . ft. 3 6 7 S S .ft. Front impervious coverage = Zl ,7 % 'j s % Z!.'1 % I attest to the best of my knowledge and belief, the above information is correct. y hitect's Signa e (4) 2/10/2015 BUILDING DEPARTMENT VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK 938 KING STREET RYE BROOK,NY 10573 (914)939-0668 FAX(914)939-5801 BULK REGULATIONS IN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS Address: G P"OrIC)c- ►-VA-v Section: 135• 4 Block: Lot: ZZ_ MAXIMUM GROSS FLOOR AREA USE FORMULA: Maximum Gross Floor Area =4,000 + [(Lot Area-21,780) x 0.11478421 ]: a. Allowed = 3 21-1-15'- Sq. Feet b. Existing = 10110. iS Sq. Feet c. Proposed = 3 571�9 Sq. Feet HEIGHT/SETBACK RATIOS FOR RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS DEFINITION: A standard designed to regulate the height of a building in relation to the average grade of the corresponding portion of the lot line from which it is set back. The ratio modifies the maximum permitted Height of Building by forming an inclined plane beginning at the average grade along the portion of the lot line from which the setback is measured and rising toward the building at the specified ratio above which no part of any building, other than minor architectural features such as chimneys, skylights and dormer windows not covering more than 10%of the entire roof area,shall be permitted to extend. Height and Setback shall be calculated using the formula; Height/Setback=X, where X is the required side or front yard ratio for the zoning district in which a property is located as specified in Article VIII of Chapter 250. A complete elevation view for the proposed improvement must be included on the drawings. FILL IN YOUR RATIOS: ZONE EUST/NG PROPOSED /PEAU/RED FRONT: FRONT: FRONT: .48 JF-2S SIDE: SIDE: SIDE: 1.30 FRONT: FRONT: FRONT: .60 JF-20 SIDE: SIDE: SIDE: 1.60 FRONT: #43 FRONT: • (OZ3 FRONT: .60 - Z� R_is SIDE:),l, I,b SIDE:[,11 Z, SIDE: 1.60 , -z% A FRONT: FRONT: FRONT: .80 R INA SIDE: SIDE: SIDE: 2.40 FRONT: FRONT: FRONT: .69 0-12 SIDE: SIDE: SIDE: 1.60 FRONT: FRONT: FRONT: .80 R-10 SIDE: SIDE: SIDE: 2.40 FRONT: FRONT: FRONT: .96 0-7 SIDE: SIDE. SIDE: 3.00 FRONT: FRONT: FRONT: 1.20 /?S SIDE: SIDE: SIDE: 4.00 FRONT: FRONT: FRONT: 1.20 R-2F SIDE: SIDE: SIDE: 4.00 attest to the best of my knowledge and belief,the above information is correct. itect's Signature (5) 2/10/2015 This application must be properly completed in its entirety by a N.Y. State Registered Architect or N.Y. State Licensed Professional Engineer & signed by those professionals where indicated. It must also include the notarized signature(s) of the legal owner(s) of the subject property, and the applicant of record in the spaces provided. Any application not properly completed in its entirety and/or not properly signed shall be deemed null and void, and will be returned to the applicant. Please note that application fees are non-refundable. STATE OF NEW YORK,COUNTY OF WESTCBESTER ) as: 10444 (r SW-I-AIZ Jf-- ,being duly sworn, deposes and states that he/she is the applicant above named, (print name of individual signing as the applicant) and further states that (s)he is the legal owner of the property to which this application pertains, or that (s)he is the h-ft)TMr for the legal owner and is duly authorized to make and file this application. (indicate architect,contractor,agent,attorney,etc.) That all statements contained herein are true to the best of his/her knowledge and belief, and that any work performed, or use conducted at the above captioned property will be in conformance with the details as set forth and contained in this application and in any accompanying approved plans and specifications, as well as in accordance with the New York State Uniform Fire Prevention&Building Code, the Code of the Village of Rye Brook and all other applicable laws, ordinances and regulations. Swom to before me this 2414' Swom to before me this day of D e4"0G1r , 20 day of , 20_L.�)_ S perty Owner tgnature of Appli V 6nd'L l r r p / JD+tJ4 (T 5CAyCL AO JIF. Print Name of Property Owner Print Name of Applicant otary Publi No blic MARGE YE110N NarARYPUBUC -ATE OF YORK PETER J.CHO WEMCHESiE. v 0 1 �MM.ow NOTARY PUBLIC,STATE OF NEW YORK NO. O1 CH6308766 QUALIFIED IN WESTCHESTER COUNTY MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JULY 28,20.? (6) 2.10.15 BUIL , . MENT �Cm � U VILy,Ql ;.. OK IJV ff 938 KING NY 10573 ` RJD FFB 2016 2 6 (914)9 39-5801 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK BUILDING DEPARTMENT *********************************************************************************************************** FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: BOT Approval Date: PB Approval Date: BOT Disapproval Date: PB Disapproval Date: Attach Resolution Hereto: BOT[ ] PB[ ] rnZ�BA[ ] Chairman: SITE PLAN FEE: ��OS 5 ' DATE PAID: 0'20 ENVIRONMENTAL FEE: Q?, ��C) DATE PAID: vZ CD l OTHER: *********************************************************************************************************** APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL Submission of this application does not assure placement on any Planning Board Agenda.The Applicant will be notified of such placement. *********************************************************************************************************** This application references but is not limited to the following sections of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook; §250 ZONING, §209 SITE PLAN REVIEW, §235 TREES, §107 DEMOLITION OF BUILDINGS, §224 SWIMMING POOLS, §121 EXCAVATION&TOPSOIL REMOVAL, §118 EROSION&SEDIMENT CONTROL, §213 STEEP SLOPES PROTECTION,§219 SUBDMSION OF LAND, §250-40 NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS.Applicants and their Design Professionals are strongly advised to review the above mentioned code sections online at,www.ryebrook.org prior to completing and/or submitting this application. APPLICATION FEE SCFIEDULE: Residential Dwellings- $325,plus$200 per additional dwelling unit. Non-Residential Buildings - $475 plus $30 per parking space. Planned Unit Development-$575 per acre PUD Amendment- $300 Site Plan Amendment- $575 Wetlands&Watercourse- $1,150 Consultant Review(Escrow)Fee: Minimum fee$250-maximum fee$2,500,to be determined by the Village Engineer. Application fees are non-refundable.The applicant's Escrow Account must have a positive balance at all times prior to any Consultant,Attorney,or I Fllage review. Escrow Fees and Site Plan Fees must be paid on separate checks made payable to the Pillage of Rye Brook. *********************************************************************************************************** 1. Site Address: tr(.� PP P D O G K �6p P Parcel ID#:135-.-S4- I-ZZ Zone: ` 1:5' 2. Property Owner: H.;A--r 14 y &LL0 H Address: �y F,&PPQC4r—f0A-0 IZqrtA59 tK, k If E-Mail: t Tel.#: 46) ?,(,1— 3154 o 3 Other: 3. Applicant: 9—C.E►c�"��.c� Address: E-Mail: Tel.#: Other: 4. Design Professional: —_50I 14 (7 SGy!S'Iz Lp-Tc 'J YZ- lb-404f}1 frr_ , Address: 33 15 q ttAH H I L,t, 6r vvl c,,6� SCO r-. Tel. 7_-7 3- -7 35'0 Other: 5. Designate to whom correspondence is to be sent: )&C-C�4yT gCX- Note: If applicant is a-Contract Vendee".please attach a copy of the contract summary with financial and confidential terms deleted. REVISED 8/10/15 6. Street which property abuts: �{ c�0 fJnc.lc- 1'Zmob 7. Does property connect directly into State or County highway?`4 NO ( )YES: 8. Is site within 500 feet of Village Boundary?M NO ( )YES If yes note all bordering municipalities 9. Total area of site: I tros l Area of site activity: 10. Site coverage: 3 67-G-, %; Building coverage: 14 .7°lo % 11. Existing building size: 1110 . z r New/additional building size: 12. Existing parking spaces: Z New parking spaces: D 13. Nature of proposed activity: (dew `jQ.Go n to r-Lo art-j S lr►-+c�kk �� � (-=t,00 r ^00 1+7011t Pew FrbyN+ `e-y-Lj AM►'j Pe1G . Please note that this application must include the notarized signature(s)of the legal owner(s)of the above-mentioned property, in the space provided below. Any application not bearing the legal property owner's notarized signature(s).shall be deemed null and void,and will be returned to the applicant. STATE OF NEW YORK,COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER ) as: OhY1 G SCrxr lw,�A - ,being duly sworn,deposes and states that he/she is the applicant above named, (print name of individual signing as the applicant) and further states that (s)he is the legal owner of the property to which this application pertains, or that (s)he is the for the legal owner and is duly authorized to make and file this application. (indicate architeck contractor,agent,attorney,eta.) That all statements contained herein are true to the best of his/her knowledge and belief,and that any work performed,or use conducted at the above captioned property will be in conformance with the details as set forth and contained in this application and in any accompanying approved plans and specifications,as well as in accordance with the New York State Uniform Fird Prevention &Building Code,the Code of the Village of Rye Brook and all other applicable laws,ordinances and regulations. Sworn to before me this ZAftq. Sworn to before me this_ 'A-g day of 09"aNi ,20,_Lr day of 20� N Publi *NOPUbli-iSign of pe Owner ofApplicant V8160 G S�art�-4-o GtTL Print ame ofProperty Owner Print Name ofApplicant PETER J.CHO NOTARY P Bt1 9TA NNEWYoi�f NOTARY PUBLIC,STATE OF NEW YORK Wtti NO. Ot CH6308766 IXRAtL E7W QUALIFIED IN WESTCHESTER COUNTY MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JULY 28,26-0 REVISED 81016 aRnv� RF� `V' I�� VL�VILL OAF RX' OOK938 King S :tkye I .Y. 10573 EB 2 s 2016 (914)93 ? 39-5801 9913 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK BUILDING DEPARTMENT SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REVIEW CHECKL This form shall serve as a checklist for site plan submittal and review by the Village of Rye Brook. The use of this plan review checklist by the applicant is to ensure compliance with the technical provisions of§209 of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook entitled, Site Plan Review, pertaining to preliminary and final plan preparation. The Village Code is available on the Village Website at: www.Eyebrook.org_ Prior to the appearance before ANY meeting or hearing of the Planning Board,the applicant must comply with all Notification Requirements of Code Section 250-40. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL SHALL INCLUDE: 1. APPLICATIONS. Completed and signed including correspondences. 2. CHECKLIST. Completed and signed. 3. PLANS. Signed, Sealed& Dated. Fifteen paper(15) copies or twenty(20)copies when Board of Trustees approval is required and one (1) electronic version. One (1) record set with original signatures, dates and seals may be provided and submitted with fourteen (14) copies or nineteen (19) copies that clearly indicate the signatures, dates, and seals shown on the record set. 4. FEES: All application fees and Environmental fee. A separate check for filing fee and Environmental fee. 5. Environmental Assessment Form. Form available on the NYS DEC website. 6. Electronic Copy. Complete copy of all plans and shall be submitted electronically at time of submission. 7. Notarized Affidavit of Sign Posting&Mail Notification. I, (Applicant's signature)have read the Notification Requirements of Code Section 250-40 and will provide notification as required. IDENTIFICATION OF APPLICANT(S): Identification of Applicant: �LLC)H Pi 51 PF14L,E Applicant: ---I'o 4 H G S ct&.PL,,--ib -N rL ,6,re e R:Z1E c-,r Address: Po- P 0 N is, Iq o Sa-.1 Tel. #:� 21 3" 73 SU Fax: E-Mail: 5 C Agz-(-J9-TO 6 G 010.1 L�.C-0 X" Project Name: 'Ya L o k 4516144— Project Address: 6 p,&-ry c- (zi)ap , P- iE, (512oo(c, I v`� I o S7 3 Current Property Owner:_ Jo N,,6-TN'al4 '-(rL U,014 4 N¢.H Address: t9 �p'Pb O4K- V0,4-0 , IZ`-r L I51 1�� IA`� 105-2-3 Tel. #: (&4G) ZG9 - -315-4 Fax:(G46) 83 E-Mail: J' ` FU.Lon e moR.T6a64MI,sie&.661" IDENTIFICATION OF PROPERTY: Identifying Title: Tax Designation: Section: 13 S.3,4 Block: l Lot: Z 2 Zoning District: R NY Street which property abuts: pi&,P P oG K- (ZOA-p Plan Submission Date: Site Plan Checklist Pagel of 7 Project Address 6 PA Oy o o c az peo 000 The location of all existing watercourses,intermittent streams,wetland areas and springs,consistent with the definitions set forth in Chapter 245,Wetlands and Watercourses,of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook. Y N NA PROPOSED SITE PLAN INFORMATION 0 O O Sufficient, acceptable information to readily determine the location, bearing, and length of every street line, lot line, and property boundary line. 0 0 O Location of all building setback lines. 000 Topographic data at a minimum contour interval of 2'-0"increments,showing existing and proposed contours on the property and extending a minimum of 25 feet into all adjacent properties. 000 The location and characteristics of the different areas of vegetation,including the identification of all individual trees 12 or more inches in diameter at breast height("DBH"),protected trees of any size,as well as stands of trees and wooded areas, within areas of proposed disturbance, consistent with the provisions of Chapter 235,Trees, of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook. 009 Location and proposed development of all buffer areas,including existing vegetative cover. 000 Location and description of any zoning district and municipal boundaries including a zoning compliance chart for the existing and proposed lots. ® O O Shape,size,height and location of all existing and proposed buildings. O O 0 Location and description of any existing and proposed easements. 0 O O Location and dimensions of all existing and proposed streets,driveways,sidewalks,parking spaces,bicycle parking, loading areas and other facilities associated with the proposed use. O O 0 Identification of the location and amount of building area proposed for retail sales or similar commercial activity. 0 O O Location of existing and proposed utilities(water,sewer,gas,electrical,telephone,oil tank etc.). O O 0 Design and location of all existing and proposed wells, septic tanks and leach field systems,or methods of waste water disposal. 0 O O Location,type and size of all existing and proposed landscaping and screening including fences and walls. O O 0 Location,size and proposed screening of outdoor storage areas,if any. 0 O O Location, design and construction material of all existing or proposed site improvements, including drains, culverts, retaining walls,landscape walls and fences. O O 0 Exterior lighting plan and proposed signs to be located on site,including sign orientation,size,height,and elevation view. O O 0 Storm drainage plan and plans for snow removal and storage. O O 0 Pedestrian and automobile circulation plan. O O 0 Construction drawings for pavements,walks,steps,curbing,drainage&other structures associated with the proposed use. 0 O O Erosion and sedimentation control plan,including installation details of proposed control measures,directive construction notations and a schedule for the installation and maintenance of proposed control measure. 0 O O Description of measures planned to assure proper erosion and sedimentation control in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 118 entitled'Erosion and Sediment Control,"of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook. 0 O O Drawing and computation for storm water detention design for a 25-year storm in accordance with the Westchester County Best Management Practices O O 0 Rock outcroppings and areas of steep slope consistent with the definitions set forth in Chapter 213,Steep Slope Protection, of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook. O O • Location of any common lands and/or public lands. O O 0 Phasing or an estimated project construction schedule. O O i Supporting documents,including deeds,maintenance, condominium agreements,etc. Site Plan Checklist Page 3 of 7 Project Address G &Q0 or—Ir— FA ❑Development that involves filling, creation of impervious surfaces or buildings and substantive loss of natural vegetation in a floodplain or flood prone area should be avoided. ❑Above ground,vegetated retention/detention basins or devices are preferred because they perform better,are easier to inspect and maintain and provide additional environmental benefits over subsurface structural devices. Any such treatments should not be constructed within wetlands or buffer areas around wetlands. ❑The development should treat and retain as much stormwater on-site as possible,particularly when the site is located in a drainage basin with known flooding problems. A Construction Stormwater Toolbox with tools and sources of technical information related to the construction activities and stormwater management best practices is available from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation at:www.dec.ny.gov/chemical/8694.htm1 ❑New development should include protection of aquatic resources. For more information about protection of aquatic resourc-es & buffer areas,go to: planning.westchestergov.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1491&Itemid=2458 ❑Impervious cover should be minimized. Permeable paving surfaces should be used where feasible. Vegetative rain gardens should be used,particularly in areas of overland or channelized stormwater flow,to improve stormwater quality and reduce runoff volume. For more information,go to: www.westchestergov.com/stonnwater ❑Buildings along coastlines and low lying area should consider the impacts of sea level rise. Specific consideration is required of potential impacts to surface and subsurface drinking water supplies. ❑ SITE LAYOUT. Aesthetic design,building orientation and community character should be considered in the site layout and building appearance. ❑In most locations,buildings should face the street and have pedestrian access from the street. ❑Commercial buildings should be located near the front street line with the majority of parking located in the rear of the building. Even gas stations and convenience stores should be upfront in a landscaped setting with parking,pumps and canopy toward the rear. ❑Buildings should be of pedestrian-scale when seen from the sidewalk. El Building facades should contribute to and enhance the character of the community. El Driveway and pathway connections should be provided to adjacent sites when possible and crosseasements provided. ❑ STREETS. Street design should reduce unwarranted paving and promote connectivity. El New streets should connect with adjacent streets wherever feasible to prevent the proliferation of dead-end streets and promote neighborhood integration. ❑Connections could be vehicular or pedestrian/bicycle only,where appropriate. ❑Street widths should be minimized for streets with low traffic volume to reduce speeds and impervious surfaces.Lane widths of 12 feet are only appropriate for major roadways. ❑Driveway widths should be no more than 9 feet to reduce impervious surfaces. ❑Permeable paving surfaces should be used where feasible. ❑ GREEN TECHNOLOGY.New development should include as many green building elements as possible,such as:renewable building materials,energy efficient heating/cooling systems and fixtures,water saving devices,green roofs and permeable paving surfaces. Information can be obtained from the U.S. Green Building Council at:www.usgbc.org. ❑ LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING.The site improvements should enhance community character. Site Plan Checklist Page 6 of 7 Project Address 6 POLP0 0 CG k- 6R�O ❑ Landscaping should consist of native plant species appropriate for the location. Invasive plant species should be prohibited. Invasive plant information available at:www.westchestergov.com/planning/environmental/Reports/InvasivePlantsBrochO8.pdf ❑ Pollutant tolerant plantings should effectively shield parking,loading areas and refuse collection sites. ❑ Site lighting should be provided at the lowest safe levels and lowest heights,avoiding all spillage off site. ❑ PEDESTRIANS. Safe,convenient and ADA accessible pedestrian access is provided. ❑ A sidewalk should be provided along the site frontage along each street. ❑ Direct pedestrian connections should be made from the front of the building to the sidewalk.Pedestrian crossings of drive-ways& parking lots should be minimized or avoided.If they must be provided,painted crosswalks should be provided through parking lots. ❑ ADA accessibility must be provided. ❑ BICYCLISTS.Provisions for bicyclists should be incorporated into project design. ❑ Bicycle parking should be provided in commercial and residential developments.Guidelines can be found at: www.apbp.org/resource/resmgr/publicationstbicycle_parking_guidelines.pdf ❑ If near a trailway or bicycle route,extra consideration should be given to bicycle accessibility such as bike lanes on internal roadways,bicycle parking and other amenities. ❑ Drive-thru lanes at uses such as banks and fast-food restaurants should also be accessible for bicycles. Waiver: Upon finding by the Building Inspector, Village Engineer, Planning Board or Board of Trustees that, due to the particular character or limited nature of development or change in use or to special conditions peculiar to a site,the submission of a final site plan,or certain portions of information normally required as part of the site development plan, is inappropriate or unnecessary or that strict gompliance with said submission requirements will cause extraordinary and unnecessary hardship, such official or Board may waive such submission requirements wherever, in the opinion of such official or Board, such waiver will be consistent with the goal of promoting the public health, safety and general welfare of the community. The findings for granting such waiver shall become a part of the public record. Any waiver request must be made in writing, and include sufficient detailed information for the appropriate authority to make an informed decision. Design Professional's Certification of Completion of Checklist I have fully reviewed the Village of Rye Brook's requirements and certify this application to be a complete submission. I understand that an incomplete plat or incomplete checklist shall be deemed an incomplete .ssion and shall be returned to the applicant upon determination of such by the appropriate authority. ED AyC�r, Name(Print) --Zbhr G S cctrle�-ru 3L ;4 / .(-- Signature r e- Signature Q,,�6 �+�► 02S26Q,'�f�� Date Professional Seal Site Plan Checklist Page 7 of 7 Short Environmental Assessment Form Part 1 -Project Information Instructions for Comuletim Part 1 -Project Information. The applicant or project sponsor is responsible for the completion of Part 1. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding,are subject to public review,and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item,please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information. Complete all items in Part 1. You may also provide any additional information which you believe will be needed by or useful to the lead agency;attach additional pages as necessary to supplement any item. Part 1-Project and Sponsor Information Yellon Residence Name of Action or Project: Additions and alterations Project Location(describe,and attach a location map): 6 Paddock Road,Rye Brook N.Y.10573 Brief Description of Proposed Action: Left side two story addition to attach existing two car garage.Second story addition over existing First floor.Alter and renovate existing First floor.New rear flagstone patio.New covered front porch. Name of Applicant or Sponsor: Telephone: (914)273-7350 John G.Scarlato Jr. E-Mail: JGScarlato@Gmail.com Address: 33 Byram Hill Road City/PO: State: Zip Code: Armonk N.Y. 10504 1.Does the proposed action only involve the legislative adoption of a plan,local law,ordinance, NO YES administrative rule,or regulation? If Yes,attach a narrative description of the intent of the proposed action and the environmental resources that ❑1 ❑ may be affected in the municipality and proceed to Part 2. If no,continue to question 2. 2. Does the proposed action require a permit,approval or funding from any other governmental Agency? NO YES If Yes,list agency(s)name and permit or approval: ❑ ❑ Building Departmnet permit upon Planning Board approval �/ 3.a.Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? 0.345 acres b.Total acreage to be physically disturbed? 0.011 acres c.Total acreage(project site and any contiguous properties)owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? 0.345 acres 4. Check all land uses that occur on,adjoining and near the proposed action. ❑Urban [--]Rural(non-agriculture) [-]Industrial ❑Commercial 21 Residential(suburban) ❑Forest ❑Agriculture ❑Aquatic []Other(specify): ❑Parkland Page 1 of 3 5. Is the proposed action, NO YES N/A a.A permitted use under the zoning regulations? ❑ Fv-� F-1- b. b.Consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan? ❑ ❑ ❑✓ 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the predominant character of the existing built or natural NO YES landscape? ❑ Z 7. Is the site of the proposed action located in,or does it adjoin,a state listed Critical Environmental Area? NO YES If Yes,identify: ❑✓ ❑ 8. a.Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels? NO YES 21 F-1- b. b.Are public transportation service(s)available at or near the site of the proposed action? ❑✓ EI- c. c.Are any pedestrian accommodations or bicycle routes available on or near site of the proposed action? ❑✓ ❑ 9.Does the proposed action meet or exceed the state energy code requirements? NO YES If the proposed action will exceed requirements,describe design features and technologies: Increased insulation,energy efficient windows and doors,updtaed heating sysytems. ❑ F 10. Will the proposed action connect to an existing public/private water supply? NO YES If No,describe method for providing potable water: ❑ 0 11.Will the proposed action connect to existing wastewater utilities? NO YES If No,describe method for providing wastewater treatment: ❑ ❑✓ 12. a.Does the site contain a structure that is listed on either the State or National Register of Historic NO YES Places? ❑✓ ❑ b.Is the proposed action located in an archeological sensitive area? ❑ 13. a.Does any portion of the site of the proposed action,or lands adjoining the proposed action,contain NO YES wetlands or other waterbodies regulated by a federal,state or local agency? RI ❑ b.Would the proposed action physically alter,or encroach into,any existing wetland or waterbody? 21 ❑ If Yes,identify the wetland or waterbody and extent of alterations in square feet or acres: 14. Identify the typical habitat types that occur on,or are likely to be found on the project site. Check all that apply: ❑Shoreline ❑Forest ❑Agricultural/grasslands ❑Early mid-successional ❑ Wetland ❑Urban m Suburban 15.Does the site of the proposed action contain any species of animal,or associated habitats,listed NO YES by the State or Federal government as threatened or endangered? R] ❑ 16.Is the project site located in the 100 year flood plain? NO YES 17.Will the proposed action create storm water discharge,either from point or non-point sources? NO YES If Yes, El Rl a.Will storm water discharges flow to adjacent properties? ❑✓ NO YES b.Will storm water discharges be directed to established conveyance systems(runoff and storm drains)? If Yes,briefly describe: ❑NO EYES New Drywells via,leader pipes Page 2 of 3 18.Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that result in the impoundment of NO YES water or other liquids(e.g.retention pond,waste lagoon,dam)? If Yes,explain purpose and size: ❑ 19.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the location of an active or closed NO YES solid waste management facility? If Yes,describe: ❑ 20.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the subject of remediation(ongoing or NO YES completed)for hazardous waste? If Yes,describe: F I AFFIRM THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Applicant/sponsor name:John G.Scarlato Jr. Date: 1-5-16 Signature: PRINT FORM Page 3 of 3 (O - .,f �'' ' ii ,' - 1 1 it_ - 'I -,', ,'1 O CD CD 'iti4yG•J -I •mss • ' Wrai�'�.�1 �, - I' p' ' ,� ' !a I' ,, •' r Fn ,- 'mss, J - 3" ,, .� i <,,�.}.�?r$ l�,l, ,, i• i , , f_.LJ:I� I�. __.t.,•:•'•__'77,`++'' f�f�4.5`' 17- � -< ,x ��- �• T,,�_ _ , . —:--Ire "N L� 1 I '�r -,�. �- — _ �:- ;rte-.•+�.: ��•�- a... -n �_���_;��.; II'..��.,! J w•-� '° •; 1�'111 !_III I r f' d ,d s�q � �••+;, '. , K Y'_� ;d ,I-•� .I—,!t`Jy�:st•:� i 111 .l 7 �*; )L\ JI-! 55:,C `_• ' �+ - '• ! y}L ik �.til='^•h. '� �'F � i r_ f _ 1 iFm 4- }"�, r1 mC •�'ir��:ic• •s( /J rl,.� ntr_ 1 I. ��.}«r'�!. -Il_-'r� I Jlj ''��=9rj'.�_ S aA < ��it� 1 5 1 1 +. �`-,:.••. �' F �•, �:_ � r-- ;...; ITS I II � I '+ �-':�:1. �' �.r „•:-. ' `� 1� ,�. �� 1,4r.�'.�+1 �,�'-j-.J l i:�l_-�. I •� � I j~� � �' ''� �•!•.'n":;t4')•'1:`s-.f�. M z � ' 1 ��J, 1 JI f 1+ } r .•++tt7 i. � 1�-��:�� �'.l�il�' \-.� f,� L7 1 1a. �-7'tii IL_.'1-3 J�: L��'I-4--I-^Com' i_ F�.��!_? , IL_!1"� �fi}�+ }?'r\'rf� =�•. m; I '.: 1_•"L- 1 .1 1 .i.�} ?-+ I I I•L,,,- - I , [_�� rli• G i J.�'\ � .� _r, < r I r '-_-..\ Iy.�er.-=(-�v'.1� r_"T•'I >fs• k•.'� i ,. '�:• ( }".6..1 ( �.- r�: f'i�7- }.�M T _.T I •I.''v '�` '•'-I;ry - I IAC;.__!7' t I•.�`'';1 ICC/'j'1 14 .Jr1-1'.'f-...,�' i'-I f-7 1.1 (�.-*�";,'E i •;�. I 'S'T� •- I '�. � _"�'��a,ry`-..ti e � �;�Rlf�<� / ("I-11 I ;J�j _j I,!r�-�,:� �r�ic_j•' 07 ty '�1.� .,.C_J T'•^�CI` I ��HH(( ctir :?.�•\'il; �'\'�,�a' lid/1.�,1'^"1_ L,�-; a, ' 1 "G. ,(:`�'�'v'.--Y f0 :It,.'AN t v•vf'� _��r-I���L � # ; :��.. h ��r`r:�,.C� ?J�' ♦r ) 1 n,\,y� � �,M1 ',� f L I.T :.�':'. v '�' ��,,c• � Y ti-'1ti tD i I11 �j�rt ar. �I•��.''; f�'�� \� �f; `' I� .�f-'rl a' is �`x4t f� Fr^ 7ti N , , �'. •� t i,•+Fti' j :r, cr' . 1,`4•:^ R YC \, .t f.7 �•...•.J-� 1, ' ' (� '_111111 �-� .:t"`1;1 � f 'r� ._rPrail .t:#T„ ti�� �,�. CD I`IT Ij�, f7_ r / . ■��/,c�I' I CD _ .{ '�� ? :^ � i(,\r Iri ' III> 11_;'Y�' -`�.•%'�' -_�'?�=..4+-+�•! 7 - 1 C 1 J•1• Jy �,1 5,e Y • ) yr I� CD �tr�_•�Y"�r �-LI hlhi.�}. � -•.Ik.. yt-�f;;.r i i _ '1•c. . J.51 _� J ' II 1�",5'�IG.,,i�,l _�-•ti�j L1.1 1 ' 1'r� i•','T'IYJ,e+�.�'�:,:j'�1 5. V'' I' z.;.��f:.,,y';y•,•" I_"1��� s•.L p ._. 'tD•,I ,;� I 1='_�+•1,� 4 r '� 1..o�.••i� 1,01-- 5 �` �.;9,'. `�. ' a 5 ti"'K'. '� •..! y��F 1,c+�f�.y„ `''<,` L I l ET-1-- �1 . `. II 1Jli ^Jr�1n uc \ ,_LII IJ..x- +Jrr.• r.. �;r r: I [ • �1� ;. ?i--i rri _ tiF•;. 1Y. d-1`r *' '� � •r i +4 � u 11 �1, y,fit ti.M' , ir_r4 � r-;-:� �, \v f'� 7, }�•.;_: l'•+�.n'••_ \ •"^' ��i;•'r4� •� r _�. .;� t_ -�1 a' '++, `•. •� �.lf r• I�•t �'f`•�'y' r'• L % - r '~I 1 L n 1 i.• — is I_ I r !•'.9 "`i-r ` :,j'•, "'" f•' ,�" a+; Z_--, P� �LI � I.1_ I�j-��.•-: (,��.. c. _ '�:� ` -7. ��A.w � `\:ti/�• .f�'.�_., \ •w,• £.r i t`• IT 1�''-.1 d •:�:.Yt;alir:� �.i'}:��1�_:. ,��-_Li''?' _ r.�•��' \ �.f�i ( ' .�?I -��'.',�+ta Y I:c J DR [Ec E� YE IDsic 3 0 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK BUILDING DEPARTMENT Engineer's Report for Yellon Residence 6 Paddock Rd Rye Brook, New York Dated December 18, 2015 Revised EW y O� s. ur O - oQ tii W Prepared by: t = Christopher S. Utschig P.E. 65 Ralph Ave White Plains, NY ''c►E No. p9p �r" 914 391-9550 °'anoF�.+��o NYS Professional Engineer Lic#090138 Engineers Report Rye Brook,New York 6 Paddock Rd A. Introduction This report has been prepared in support of the redevelopment of the property at 6 Paddock Rd, Rye Brook NY.The proposed redevelopment will include the reconstruction of a single family home. The report and associated plans were prepared in accordance with the Westchester County, NY, Stormwater Management Best Management Practices for Stormwater Runoff Control in compliance with the requirements of the Village of Rye Brook pursuant to Storm Water Control Permit.The existing conditions identified on the site plan were taken from a survey prepared by Richard Spinelli dated 12/15 2015.The foundation geometry for the proposed home is from plans prepared by John G,Scarlatto. B. Existing Conditions The existing property is a 0.35 acre residentially zoned property.The property is developed with an existing one and one half story home,walks,deck and driveway the balance being lawn and landscaping.The subject properties topography can be described as gently sloping from east to west.All Stormwater leaves the property in an overland fashion, no evidence of existing Stormwater systems or alternate conveyance means are apparent. Percolation tests were conducted,the results are provided on the plans. C. Proposed Condition The proposed condition includes the remodeling of the existing structure to include a second floor, revised patio and walkways. The grading as proposed leaves the existing yard grading essentially untouched and thereby leaving the existing drainage patterns unchanged.The proposed condition will result in a total impervious area of 3,675 sf. The on-site drainage has been designed to provide full mitigation for all impervious areas for the 25 Year Storm Event(6.5").The design proposes an underground detention/infiltration system consisting of(4)Cultec 330 HD. Runoff from the roof will be piped to the detention system. The detention system has been sized such that the entire volume of runoff from the impervious areas during the design storm is completely detained. D. Construction Phasing Plan and Sediment and Erosion Control Management Maintenance of Temporary and Permanent Structures and Practices Temporary and permanent erosion controls measures will be maintained and inspected in accordance with the Grading and Drainage Plan.All proposed soil erosion and sediment control practices are designed in accordance with the following publications: o New York State Standards and Specifications for Erosion and Sediment Control,August 2005, latest edition. o New York State Guidelines for Urban Erosion and Sediment Control, latest edition, o New York State General Permit for Stormwater Discharges, o "Reducing the Impacts of Stormwater Runoff from New Development",as published by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC),second edition,April 1993. The proposed soil erosion and sediment control devices include: protective earthmoving procedures and grading practices,soil stabilization, inlet protection,stabilized construction entrance and silt fencing. The approach of the plan is to control off-site sedimentation, and re-establish vegetation as soon as practicable. Page 13 Engineer's Report Rye Brook,New York 6 Paddock Rd Construction shall be implemented in the following order: 1. Erosion and sediment control (ESC) measures and Pollution Prevention (PP)implementation, a) Install silt fences along easterly project limits, b) Maintain existing macadam driveway to utilize as a site construction entrance to the project area, material storage area and dumpster location. i) Contractor shall install stone stabilized entrance at end of the existing paved driveway in advance of construction vehicles requiring access from graded/exposed soils to City Streets. c) Install Tree Protection d) Install temporary sanitary facilities(portable toilets) in a location that is at least 20 from any drainage facility or flow path. Recommend staking the facility to prevent accidental tipping by construction activity or wind. e) Install waste container—maintain rigorous site cleaning schedule to prevent debris from blowing off site. Construction waste shall be stored in a dumpster and carried off-site on a regular basis f) Demolish existing structures g) Allocate concrete washout areas 2. Clearing and grubbing. a) Strip topsoil and stockpile. Initiate cover practices and sediment controls at the base of the stockpile.Stockpile can be temporarily stabilized with tarp or mulch and/or temporary seeding. b) Disturbed areas where construction will cease for more than 14 days will be stabilized with erosion controls,such hydro-seeding, hydro-mulch, or hay 3. Excavate foundation a) Install dewatering practice if necessary. 4. Vertical construction (install foundation and wood frame superstructure) 5. Install subsurface storage and infiltration system and site drainage to capture roof leader runoff. 6. Final stabilization of disturbed areas a) Install minimum 4"topsoil and final stabilize with lawn or mulch in landscape areas. b) Remove all ESC and PP measures upon approval of design engineer and/or ESC inspector. Awarded contractor shall be responsible for the proper implementation of the ESC and PP practices.The following maintenance program is proposed in order to maintain the proper function of all drainage and erosion and sediment control facilities: o Inspect sediment control devices and construction access point routinely and if necessary remove accumulated sedimentation and debris;at no point should the filter bed be allowed to continue operations beyond 50%of its capacity being compromised by debris. o All disturbed area will be stabilized and the sediment build-up in the filter removed.After the construction is completed, any areas disturbed shall be stabilized immediately after the required work is completed. o Restore and re-seed any eroded areas as soon as possible o The Stormwater Management Facilities Maintenance Program will be managed by the home owner and shall include removal of sediment from the on-site catch basins and underground storage facilities. The contractor shall provide a Trained Individual to be present on site at all times during soil disturbing activities Any disturbed areas shall be re-vegetated as soon as possible.Topsoil shall be temporarily stockpiled for Page 14 Engineer's Report Rye Brook,New York 6 Paddock Rd future use in grading and landscaping.Stockpile locations have been provided on the Erosion and Sediment Control Plan and shall be contained within a silt fence/hay bale barrier. The existing driveway shall be maintained throughout construction to be utilized for the site construction entrance.A temporary stabilized construction entrance comprised of a stone anti-track pad shall be installed as necessary to minimize dirt tracking.The purpose of a stabilized entrance is to remove as much soil from the construction vehicle tires prior to exiting the site and traveling on the existing roadways. For dewatering activities during excavation of the footings, a dewatering pump shall be located in a perforated tub surrounded by filter fabric and stone(or approved alternative).Clean discharge should be directed to onsite drainage appurtenances to minimize erosion of soils. Discharge with suspended sediment shall be connected to a sediment bag on undisturbed ground in a location where the discharge will not cause erosion or flow over exposed soils. If the contractor encounters ground water during the excavation of the filtering system, he shall notify the design engineer immediately.The contractor shall store all excavated material at the designated location show on the Grading and Erosion Control Plan with the appropriate erosion control measures corresponding to the stockpile detail. Contractor shall be responsible for maintaining the cleanliness of the streets(driveways/parking and adjacent areas)and storm drain inlet protection (as applicable) Best Management Practices(BMPs) throughout the construction project. Permanent seeding shall be installed immediately after the final design grades are achieved but no later than fourteen (14)days after construction activities have ceased.After stabilization,accumulated sediment shall be removed from site for disposal along with construction debris,trash and temporary BMPs E. Conclusion: The implementation of this stormwater management plan will mitigate the post development stormwater flows and not adversely affect the adjacent properties or the existing drainage system. The stormwater runoff generated by the proposed addition has been attenuated by the construction of an underground storage system. Page 15 Engineer's Report Rye Brook,New York 6 Paddock Rd APPENDIX A Proposed Condition Calculations U J Ln J O c N O O � N Up N -p N d1 �_ O O Cl) aCL o o -a a LL! o 40 rn= t 0 N L l N ■ � O � Lco CL O C O ti r y O aL N V0. 4. o o LL-) �o 0 Cc CQ O'U 2 O 2 CL o Y J 0 C O CL U f0 N Q' 8 Paddock Rd Proposed Prepared by Christopher Utschig P.E. Printed 12/20/2015 HydroCAD® 10.00 s/n 07508 ©2012 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 2 Area Listing (all nodes) Area CN Description (acres) (su bcatchment-n umbers) 0.084 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG B (1S) 8 Paddock Rd Proposed Type 11 24-hr 25 Year Rainfall=6.40" Prepared by Christopher Utschig P.E. Printed 12/20/2015 HydroCAD®10.00 s/n 07508 @2012 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 3 Summary for Subcatchment 1S: Proposed Impervios Runoff Runoff = 0.50 cfs @ 12.11 hrs, Volume= 0.040 af, Depth> 5.63" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24-hr 25 Year Rainfall=6.40" Area (sf) CN Description 3,675 98 Unconnected roofs, HSG B 3,675 100.00% Impervious Area 3,675 100.00% Unconnected Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 20.0 Direct Entry, Direct Entry Subcatchment 1S: Proposed Impervios Runoff Hydrograph 0.55 0.50 CfS 10 Runoff 0.5 Type II 24-hr 0.45 25 Year Rainfall=6.40" 0.4 Runoff Area=3,675 sf 0.35 Runoff Volume=0.040 of 7 42 0.3 Runoff Depth>5.63" Tc=20.0 min o 0.25 CN=98 LL. 0.2 0.15-:- 0.1-- 0.05- . .150.10.05 0 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Time (hours) JOB Christopher S. Utschig P.E. SHEET NO. OF-- 65 Ralph Ave White Plains, NY 10606 CALCULATED BY DATE 914-391-9550 CHECKED BY DATE SCALE --- ............ J.- p! 22b "T AJIZ ►4 r �4 Fr_ _T rz A r IM P A-1 S'IF "44 TorA-L ........... lot 40 4_1 AAR-r-�A 4F i I ILI— Of- �31 7,0 KT-'j bo'l. Sol 0019 1�0 14D MOG 011% L • JOB 0 C._1 Christopher S. Utschig P.E. SHEETNO. OF 65 Ralph Ave White Plains, NY 10606 CALCULATED BY DATE 914-391-9550 CHECKED BY DATE SCALE E I i __....._...... ._. i i h _........ E I I101f .......... _.... 1._.._ �_ L_ -1- I _ : ' I : � I I I 13 Qµ AA�h - G. ,..�' M �n, Am.o-, .= % ,$+.�,�' 4-10►5' 1 p, i I E i E- --- ....... 2'7 - /61 -- - - -- - -- ` L E JOB Christopher S. Utschig P.E. SHEET NO. OF 65 Ralph Ave White Plains, NY 10606 CALCULATED BY DATE 914-391-9550 CHECKED BY DATE SCALE 1 E . : f : .._._..�... t �......_.. ; -- i 1_4I T— i r- - —�-- Ef : } yt La�j � f 239, 9. G, .__.._; _........i--- -1 -4-4- -.... - 1 1 r i t : i i... vv i V•o� f i aE i I I : : r. __._.F...- - WP Vo�j� -- : i 1.._. g' � E • JOB Christopher S. Utschig P.E. SHEET NO. OF 65 Ralph Ave White Plains, NY 10606 CALCULATED BY DATE 914-391-9550 CHECKED BY DATE SCALE f I .. _ _ I I - . rL l� goo I ASP, AA 7 I : : L_- t, ......- -- - - - .... �-- : Oro `•1 r 133' _ = �Z : � { f 6 PIZ 10747 c.to, Engineer's Report Rye Brook,New York 6 Paddock Rd APPENDIX B USDA Soils Report U a 'm- o i 0 ammmmmmmmmmmmmm ❑ m ❑ aQmmQQQ ❑ < < ca m Z N m N � ° Z C) D O O C w Oco U U cn c m C C C C C C C C C C 32 32 C 3 U 'C U m C a+ O L �- A a O O O }O, 0 0 0 0 0 0 m m O m 0 _m O CT> > C C o m m O V 0) `m w v y �. zZZt � _ E = E ,N s HY m 7 O OYYY y YY m IE E =c co m m m m 'M 'M M m ca m m m co — cy3 m 0 E > = vv 0 0 U — '� '3 Q om ° O O cu -C LLLLLLLLLL O OL O O m = 'o N C C C O o y C C (1) s V UUUUUUUUUUUUUUU2 � U2 � ❑ L1. � LLLL.2 = 22W — YYJ t U C m T) U) C U Y c_ Q} 3 3 E 'o^ m o V Z N l0 O O .O N N � � c Q (D p ` yy Cl) N N y m d) CL m O L C7 C C C p O h O N �+% ym m m m Y Y — C c ym wgy CUp C O 0 '° > > > 0 0 2 0 0 ` .mV. cN �O y yOO` Ln> > X X X X X X m mm m m m °O y N LON m O O m O O O p Cyvi, y y O O m N CL O y 6 0 y N N c c _ E E E E E E X X $ $ " Ly ap ° o M - - o y .. ,. �. - - o 0 o 0O 0Q 0LO M .+ C C N �+ C C C Q - - U U C1 (� U Ch CO > > y 3 c cs c XXXXo00000 ofo v-ooXX mLEo m m °� m m m m m m m m U w - u U O m N m N Ca CL CL O O V CL m LO LO m Lntntn — — - - > > > > > > a v.3 y y y E E ° a� 2 LONM LnNLhvEEEE ° U ° Ooo cc EEEc00 Lcomto rn 0OOOOOo00 Cc,, c°� c'�iac'�ic"i00.39 > > 0Oo myy � 0 0 0 0 O o > > m E N CO N N co - N L 7 0 0 0 1 1 r1 t1 1 Mn 32 32 Ix w it x of L� z~ E E a� m a� > > c c p V -0 -0 .r .. $' Lo E E E E E E E E E m mLL 0 0 0 0 0 0 w y o o L>o L>a m ° ° -19 UYY m O Z m m m m m m m m m L L r.+ ... �, �., Y Y 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O (� (� U 0222222 C C —_ _ v E i i U U L C C C C C C C C C C C C m m m m m m m m .y y O O E m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 _m m _m m _m m m m 17> > c c m m m C t C C 'C 'C 'C C m m 0 O Y Y y y ._ Y Y m CL m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m E > > U c U - - 3 w U m m L L L t L L L L L L L t L L L L L L L m > � `1 m` C C_ C O O y C C L-4 UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU ❑ LLMLL. IL22222 — YYJ N `L � a mmU ❑ LuopU ❑ WLL (� (� ❑ ❑ UUU ❑ ❑ ❑ � ,� ,� .. mU ❑ LL IL mu -5 U- � 7Q � � C C C C C c7 R j, U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U ❑ = 2 2 2 = — Y Y -j N CO O O ~ C N N C —C Op y (14 11 C N .7 N CD Ln m mC C7 U U 'p c0 haw w TL 0-0E �� �v '+ E °7 c0 N $,E W 8 M. ro O `tp L } W N ca m o Z E ai 'o.Dan d:° 15 c � ao �m 0 01 CMI. C 2-40) a Z� y y 2 D� Z Z N w '7 ��y Q O C y E m O y W y C trail�j 7 Q 2' 3 N .Q E U A m m L O Q C N O L 3 O C G Q m a.2m yo � o.t2 to oCL a c � m a.0. d p m y 01 UUP LLL. m ; `o y c H` a�`� y c'°- m � ; w� CL o' Elm m Z c o w �m MOa m -(du LL) E c o v a ya yy CL E C N y 0 d y L N to N o a 0 m p y E >, c v c� a m E a-6 E Z� E 4) B.� c.3 y 3 ° m � E cm N o .2'�0 >,- o 2j ya to cm 0)0poQa` m0c '7 CD yoEocmom � It° 0 o 'r N m•o0o ca rn con c) _E � a'vac� F-� mtn tnc oN F- c��o 0 } 3 aTi z � U U ::3 � y U:7 — m Q U FL cn m >aD °U LM) ° m 0 m co. � W x y '�' �' � •io co � Z W W J o � y Q �CL _ i a `° mm c 0 $ w IL c El El I J 'y o c � m � m 00 z� z z e 's T9ZZKb SSZLbSb 6bzzbSb EWMV V LEZZbSb TEZZKO SZZZKV u)cr) r w M 2L db,F1M.Z[.i4.EL N ° N a CL (D} y ° Z z rn a� R (D O ° m � a � 8 a N 3U Z C R� O m z Gox co 1 � m m ZQ z V M.bL,Tb oEL M.bi,ib oEL 4 T9z-b SSZzbSb 61,UKO EbZZOD LEZZKV TEMSb SZZzbSb ?� z z e e • Soil Map—Westchester County,New York Map Unit Legend Westchester County,New York(NY119) Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI UhB Urban land-Chariton complex, 0.3 88.4°x6 to 8 percent slopes UhC Urban land-Chariton complex,8 0.0 11.6°x6 to 15 percent slopes Totals for Area of Interest 0.3 100.0% usDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 12/20/2015 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3 Engineer's Report Rye Brook,New York 6 Paddock Rd Table of Contents A. Introduction B. Existing Conditions C. Proposed Conditions D. Construction Phasing Plan and Sediment and Erosion Control Management E. Conclusion APPENDIX A Proposed Condition Calculations Page 12 �+1 v � l O a � W � O � F+ CL, O U W U Z .7r19nd ICJMON ... ...... .. ....- ...... .....;o dap.... sc p-ow aaopaq oi. mobs pure paquasgns ev ...... •aSpaioux•vbo siq jo ann aJa pauruoa uralag3 swawaiu3s aq>mp poi ';oaaag3 sivaww acp sboux pas uoq.8aOda gutolwo; aqi pear seq aq laq, :pawau anoga 3uwlldde................._......__...........:_............................._......_.....---------•--• - ...-.......................aqf st aq 3ag3 sdas'u=obs drop 9uraq i-----------_........_. ._.._...................................... ......:........ !' e7 msaTm,& ;o Alun: .•ss xJOA baN;o 03ans N7-- IA WN �T.,► �i Q ' ! ' O `F- �•� Q �� O i s = Z � i � C Pel � � � U i o � •� = i 4) • H CL p CL • Z Q p H H ' � w� r,�. , 1 • E � ° •; i j i I i i o Oi�i E 1 cr— ao E a $ �•o 'c�i4 G4 i � � �� � • � i � 3 � g $ jai :� i � ' � i � i I •��. cA W g' '3a - i43i �J ••p � {t j 11 fy Oil ma" ON Z e = co3 o�:N �, G4 i4 u3 ai3 o • l0 're 010 0i 1PO4' O W W � ��.� 01 to or Hca ,a D.4i d i{ - < H O •• .- u a i Iia' i c � ea o r]y Z o�S L'y e'�iMCL � a"i ° i o _ i r`� n $, L• z Ea 3 i 'E u' = a h W `Q1J uY Voll � •4 •� ; i i i3 V � •, 0. S •g b a G o a e W.: m o .0 e 3 3 E 0. i .� S S $ S x .n o.o .• ni .n •C vC r ao � � i � � C < �1 S i . i }4 � •. ? � � � -•�,{ -:i �} Vii- � � � '�: LU w .�� a 4 LU �t'T+ 14 tE jtv 4 a° 4-g : I t j, i i•�' i���� j i i� r i� , `• .. I .ter,-- —i-� �._; Cc oj It . 1 - 7 x _ N. - _ 11 ..- .._ _ .. .. __. _ _ •i -- �- L' y r I ' � •_,I -,V i� _ !a`,.a \��,/� I ., � ;� i _=�- _ _-�:�'• Iii 111• +� :i W � .i�' � ai { _ _ r• �..4b i a " _._ 1. Y•n___ I l".�f �� ice, �. r� , y i _ 9 .,r > ti N M v, S V FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. PLANNING, TRANSPORTATION, ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT RYE, NEW YORK FAIRFIELD, CONNECTICUT DAVID H. STOLMAN MEMORANDUM AICP, PP PRESIDENT To: Robert I. Goodman, Chairman, and the MICHAEL A. GALANTE EXECUTIVE Planning g y Board of the Village of Rye Brook VICE PRESIDENT 35o THEO.FREMD AVE. Date: April 13, 2016 RYE, NEW YORK 1058o 914 967-6540 FAX: 914 967-6615 Subject: 6 Paddock Road— CONNECTICUT Application for Approval of a Site Plan 203 255-3100 HUDSON VALLEY As requested, we reviewed applications, supporting documents and plans 845 297-6056 submitted by John Scarlato, Jr. on behalf of property owners, Jonathan LONG ISLAND Yellon and Marcie Weehan, for approval of a site plan to construct a two- 5i6 364-4544 story infill addition and second-floor addition, a new front entry porch, www.fpdark.com rear-yard patio, change the roofline of an existing side-yard addition, and email@fpclark.com legalize a garage addition and a rear-yard deck on the property located at 6 Paddock Road in the R-15 District, Section 135.34, Block 1, Lot 22 as shown on the Town of Rye Tax Assessor's Map. Property Description The 15,051.6 square-foot property is currently developed with a one-story residence with a detached garage and deck, a breezeway, a rear-yard patio, rear-yard retaining wall and steps, driveway, curb cut and front walkway. The property slopes down 12 feet to the west from a high point along the east (front) property line. There are mature trees and other landscape plantings on the property. Project Description The Applicant proposes to unite the detached garage and the house by enclosing the breezeway. A new covered entry porch and second-stoiy addition would be added and the roof of the expanded home would be modified. All construction, other than a new rear-yard patio will be located on or over existing impervious areas on the lot. The Applicant also seeks to legalize an existing wood deck and a small 1955 addition. FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. PLANNING,TRANSPORTATION,ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT RYE,NEW YORK FAIRFIELD,CONNECTICUT Review We reviewed application materials and plans submitted by the Applicant that include the following items: 1. Short Environmental Assessment Form dated January 15, 2016 2. Exterior Building Permit Application 3. Application for Site Plan Approval and Checklist 4. Letter to the Building Department from John G. Scarlato, Jr., Architect, Armonk, N.Y., dated March 16, 2016 5. Notice of Disapproval from the Village of Rye Brook dated March 1, 2016 6. Topographic Survey, prepared by Richard Spinelli, Land Surveyor, Mamaroneck, N.Y. dated October 15, 2015 7. Engineer's Plans, prepared by Christopher S. Utschig, P.E., White Plains, N.Y.: Sheet Sheet Title Dated 1 Site Plan 11/30/15 2 Construction Details 11/30/15 8. Architect's Plans, prepared by John G. Scarlato, Jr., Architect, Armonk, N.Y.: Sheet Number Sheet Title Dated A-1 Front Elevation and Plot Plan rev. 2/25/16 A-2 Elevations 2/28/16 A-3 Wall/Building Sections 2/28/16 A-4 Foundation/Framing Plan 2/28/16 A-5 First Floor Construction Plan rev. 2/25/16 A-6 Second Floor Construction Plan 2/28/16 A-7 Roof Construction Plans 2/28/16 A-8 and A-9 Electrical Plans 2/28/16 A-10 First Floor Demolition Plan 2/28/16 A-1 land A-12 Second Floor Structural/Framing Plans 2/28/16 FAR FAR Diagrams 2/28/16 Please note that our review is limited to planning and environmental issues. We offer the following comments regarding the application: 2 FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. PLANNING,TRANSPORTATION,ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT RYE,NEW YORK FAIRFIELD,CONNECTICUT 1. Short Environmental Assessment Form (EAF). The EAF Mapper Summary Sheet was not submitted. Fill out the Short EAF online at the NYSDEC website and the EAF Mapper Summary Sheet will be printed when the EAF is printed. The Short EAF and EAF Mapper Summary should be resubmitted. 2. Site and Building Plan Non-Compliance. The proposed site plan requires several variances before it can be approved. The Notice of Disapproval from the Village indicates nine areas of non-compliance related to existing conditions to be legalized and the proposed modifications. The areas are front and side-yard setbacks, front and side-yard height/setback ratios, and allowable gross floor area (GFA). Most of the non-compliances are created by the existing foot print of the house and the detached garage, and the locations of both on the lot, which require small variances. The GFA variance necessary is the floor area of a single room, and the yard and height/setback ratio variances would not appreciably increase the bulk of the proposed building as compared to a complying design. 3. Tree Preservation and Protection. A limit of construction should be added to the site plan and individual tree protection measures should be provided for all existing regulated trees on the site within the limit of construction to protect these trees during construction in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 235 of the Village Code. The standard Rye Brook tree protection notes and details should be added to the site plan. Tree protection should be installed before the start of construction and remain in place until construction is completed. 4. Landscape Plan. The Applicant requests a waiver from the requirement to provide a landscape plan because the proposed building and site modifications would not disturb any landscaped areas of the lot. There are mature trees and shrubs on the lot that will remain in place. We agree with Mr. Scarlato that a landscape plan is unnecessary in this case. We look forward to discussion with the Planning Board. Marilyn Timpone-Mohamed, ASLA, AICP Senior Associate/Planning/Environment cc: Honorable Mayor and the Village Board of Trustees Christopher Bradbury, Village Administrator Michal Nowak, Superintendent of Public Works/Village Engineer Jennifer L. Gray, Esq., Village Attorney John Scarlato, Jr., R.A. for the Applicant J IDOCS215001Rye Brook 153R.673.6 Paddock Road.Site,Plan.intro naenio.nntn1.docx 3 April 14, 2016 RESOLUTION SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING A SITE PLAN FOR 6 PADDOCK ROAD VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK PLANNING BOARD WHEREAS, John Scarlato, Jr. submitted an application on behalf of property owners, Jonathan Yellon and Marcie Weehan, for approval of a site plan to construct a two-story infill addition, second-floor addition, a new front entry porch, rear-yard patio, change the roofline of an existing side-yard addition, and legalize a garage addition and a rear-yard deck on the property located at 6 Paddock Road in the R-15 District, Section 135.34, Block 1, Lot 22 as shown on the Town of Rye Tax Assessor's Map. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Board of the Village of Rye Brook shall hold a public hearing on June 9, 2016 at 7:30p.m. in Village Hall, 938 King Street, Rye Brook, New York to consider the above-referenced application, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Planning Board, pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) determines the Proposed Action to be a Type 2 Action requiring no further review pursuant to the requirements of SEQRA; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Applicant is hereby directed to comply with Section 250-40 of the Village Code regarding notification of the public hearing. On motion by , seconded by , Mr. Nowak, Superintendent of Public Works, called the roll: MR. ACCURSO Voting MR. GRZAN Voting MR. MORLINO Voting MR. RICHMAN Voting MRS. SCHOEN Voting MR. TARTAGLIA Voting CHAIRMAN GOODMAN Voting BRC�V� VILL CIFRY OOK 938 King S #,Rye3roo Y. 10573 (914)93 =f1 :Fit'. 39-5801 ao . 19a7 SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REVIEW CHECKLIST This form shall serve as a checklist for site plan submittal and review by the Village of Rye Brook. The use of this plan review checklist by the applicant is to ensure compliance with the technical provisions of§209 of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook entitled, Site Plan Review, pertaining to preliminary and final plan preparation. The Village Code is available on the Village Website at: www.ryebrook.pM Prior to the appearance before ANY meeting or hearing of the Planning Board,the applicant must comply with all Notification Requirements of Code Section 250-40. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL SHALL INCLUDE: 1. APPLICATIONS. Completed and signed including correspondences. 2. CHECKLIST. Completed and signed. 3. PLANS. Signed, Scaled& Dated. Fifteen paper(15) copies-or twenty(20)copies when Board of Trustees approval is required and one (1) electronic version. One (1) record set with original signatures, dates and seals may be provided and submitted with fourteen (14) copies or nineteen (19) copies that clearly indicate the signatures, dates, and seals shown on the record set. 4. FEES: All application fees and Environmental fee. A separate check for filing fee and Environmental fee. 5. Environmental Assessment Form. Form available on the NYS DEC website. 6. Electronic Copy. Complete copy of all plans and shall be submitted electronically at time of submission. 7. Notarized Affidavit of Sign.Pasting&Mail Notification. I, (Applicant's signature)have read the Notification Requirements of Code Section 250-40 and will provide notification as required. IDENTIFICATION OF APPLICANT (S): Identification of Applicant: � �LLU H F451 p),HvE Applicant: _-Yo 4 H 6. .SG Address: 33 f51'I H 14 1 L1. (gyp- p Alf M o fA 1cj i1l`t' ��SQ-9 Tel.#:_ �14) Z7 3-. 73 SO —Fax: E-Mail: Jy S C,44u_J4-Tri 6 G ma 1 L_Cnr-. Project Name: LLO 14 RS I P�14C 4 Project Address: �`Pl�GG K- a p fit. �� 6 5-2 3 Current Property Owner: J0 H1--rW,&l4 Y I'C.U_Gl 4 Address: 6 ,d-Y� 12� IC OS`73 Tel.#: (Co4G) Z.Coq - -3 1 S-4 Fax: 646 Fi 9-zSy� E-Mail: �' `��c.Lnh E: 1�o2`I-GtIG�M�S�.Com IDENTIFICATION OF PROPERTY: Identifying Title: Tax Designation: Section: 13 5o34 , Block: l Lot: Zoning District: R- VY Street which property abuts: P P oc,r-- lzo"6-p Plan Submission Date: i l 11 S Site Plan Checklist Pagel of 7 Project Address ((t`Oe+,o Y N NA PLANREOUIREMENTS 0 0 O 15-20 copies of plans prepared and signed by a registered Land Surveyor,Engineer or Architect. O O One(1)electronic copy of all submitted plans. ® O O Topographic Survey stamped by New York State Land Surveyor with license number and seal. 0 O O Topographic survey scale of one(1)inch per twenty(20)feet or larger. 0 O O Section, block and lot numbers of the property taken from the latest tax records along with a copy of the most recent property card on file with the Town of Rye Tax Assessor's office. 0 O O Name of the proposed subdivision plan. ® O O Name and address of the owner of record. 0 O O Name and address of the applicant. 0 O O Deed reference(s). 0 O O Names, addresses and signature of every Engineer, Architect, .Land Surveyor or Soil Scientist whose professional seal appears on any site plan submitted to the Board. 0 O O North arrow and scale. 0 O O Location map at the minimum scale of 1"equals 1,000 feet. ® O O Area of all lots,in square feet, 0 O O Engineering notes on plans as stated in application packages. O 0 O Copies of all existing and proposed deed restrictions or covenants applying to the property, including, but not limited to, covenants and agreements restricting the use and establishing future ownership and maintenance responsibilities for all private roads,recreation,and open space areas. O O Any prior land use approvals with respect to the subject property. 000 Date the plans were first drafted. Any revision(s)made to any of the sheets first submitted are to be so noted in the revision block. The revision block is to be placed on the originals of the revised sheets. Additional paper copies are to be made& submitted for the Planning.Board&Building Dept.to replace those sheets previously submitted. 000 Other existing site improvements,including,but not limited to, fences, landscape or retaining walls,landscaping & screening. 000 .Location of all buildings and structures on the premises and approximate location of all neighboring buildings or structures within 100 feet of the lot line. 0 O O Fees paid to The Village of Rye Brook Building Department. O 00 Any revisions to plans shall be identified with a revision cloud and numbered revision triangle Y N NA AB UTT17VG PROPER TYINFORMA TION O O O The names and addresses of all abutting property owners within 250 ft as indicated in the Municipal records. O O 0 Zoning and use of abutting properties noted on plans. O O 0 Shape,size,height and location of existing buildings and driveways within one hundred(100)feet of the site. O O 0 Location and description of existing easements within one hundred(100)feet of the site. O O ® Location of existing private or public trails within one hundred(100)feet of the site. O O 0 Location of existing roads,scenic roads and/or driveways within two hundred(200)feet of the site. O O 0 Location of proposed parkland. if none state nearest recreation facility O O 0 Location of existing septic system leach fields within two hundred(200)feet of the site. O O 0 Locations,dimensions,grades and flow direction of existing sewers, culverts,waterlines as well as other underground utilities within and adjacent to the property. Site Plan Checklist Page 2 of 7 Project Address C Do c,[C Ro nrC� O O m The location of all existing watercourses, intermittent streams,wetland areas and springs,consistent with the definitions set forth in Chapter 245,Wetlands and Watercourses, of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook. Y N NA PROPOSED SITE PLAN INFORMATION 0 O O Sufficient, acceptable information to readily determine the location, bearing, and length of every street he, lot line, and property boundary line. 000 Location of all building setback lines. ® O O Topographic data at a minimum contour interval of 2'-0"increments,showing existing and proposed contours on the property and extending a minimum of 25 feet into all adjacent properties. 000 The location and characteristics of the different areas of vegetation, including the identification of all individual trees 12 or more inches in diameter at breast height("DBH"),protected trees of any size, as well as stands of trees and wooded areas, within areas of proposed disturbance, consistent with the provisions of Chapter 235, Trees, of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook. 009 Location and proposed development of all buffer areas,including existing vegetative cover. 000 Location and description of any zoning district and municipal boundaries including a zoning compliance chart for the existing and proposed lots. 0 0 O Shape, size,height and location of all existing and proposed buildings. 000 Location and description of any existing and proposed easements. 000 Location and dimensions of all existing and proposed streets,driveways, sidewalks,parking spaces,bicycle parking, loading areas and other facilities associated with the proposed use. 000 Identification of the location and amount of building area proposed for retail sales or similar commercial activity. 0 O O Location of existing and proposed utilities(water,sewer,gas,electrical,telephone,oil tank etc.). O O 0 Design and location of all existing and proposed wells, septic tanks and leach field systems,or methods of waste water disposal. 0 O O Location,type and size of all existing and proposed landscaping and screening including fences and walls. O O 0 Location,size and proposed screening of outdoor storage areas, if any. IV O O Location, design and construction material of all existing or proposed site improvements, including drains, culverts, retaining walls,landscape walls and fences. O O 0 Exterior lighting plan and proposed signs to be located on site,including sign orientation,size,height,and elevation view. O O ® Storm drainage plan and plans for snow removal and storage. O O 0 Pedestrian and automobile circulation plan. O O 0 Construction drawings for pavements,walks, steps,curbing,drainage&other structures associated with the proposed use. 0 O O Erosion and sedimentation control pian,including installation details of proposed control measures,directive construction notations and a schedule for the installation and maintenance of proposed control measure. 0 O O Description of measures planned to assure proper erosion and sedimentation control in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 118 entitled "Erosion and Sediment Control,"of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook. 0 O O Drawing and computation for storm water detention design for a 25-year storm in accordance with the Westchester County Best Management Practices O O 0 Rock outcroppings and areas of steep slope consistent with the definitions set forth in Chapter 213,Steep Slope Protection, of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook. O O 0 Location of any common lands and/or public lands. O O 0 Phasing or an estimated project construction schedule. O O 0 Supporting documents,including deeds,maintenance, condominium agreements,etc. Site Plan Checklist Page 3 of 7 Project Addresses oC��Ic_ CZ2p, m 000 Location of proposed construction or area of disturbance and its relationship to any property line, easement, building, structure, road, wall, fence, sewage disposal system, well, wetland feature or tree exceeding six inches in diameter measured at a height of four feet from the ground 000 Estimate of earthwork showing the quantity of any material to be imported to and/or removed from the site including a chart with the number/species and size of any trees to be removed. 000 Location and size of areas of soils by soil types in the area of proposed disturbance and to a distance of 100 feet surrounding the area of disturbance. 000 Cross sections of steep slope areas. 000 Retaining walls or like constructions,with details of construction. O O ® Approximate boundaries of any areas subject to flooding or stormwater overflows, including areas of special flood hazard and coastal high-hazard areas, consistent with the definitions set forth in Chapter 130, Flood Damage Prevention, of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook.Approximate Wetlands and wetland buffer boundaries shall be clearly delineated. 000 Location of fire and other emergency zones, including the location of fire hydrants. 000 Studies to include,but not necessarily limited to: environmental impact analysis,wildlife,.traffic,stormwater management,recreation,public service, fiscal impact,visual impact and historic significance documentation, or a written request to waive the submission requirements for these studies. 000 Amount of any bonds required. O O 0 Amount of excavated material to be removed from site,if any. Y N NA OTHER as applicable O O 0 Record of application for and approval status of all necessary permits from state and county officials and local utility companies. O O 0 Identification of any federal,state or county permits required for the project's execution, including project referrals, if any,&environmental review procedures mandated by Article 8,Environmental Quality Review,of the Environmental Conservation Law(SEQRA). 00 0 Any other information felt necessary by the Planning Board to allow the Board to proceed with consideration&to make an informed decision. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CHECKLIST WESTCHESTER COUNTYPLANNING BOARD Notice to Applicants/Developers: At some point during the development review process your project may be referred to the Westchester County Planning Board for review and comment in accordance with state and county laws that require local planning boards, zoning boards of appeals and governing bodies to refer certain development applications to the County Planning Board. Referral to the County Planning Board may not occur until your project has progressed well along through the design process. Since the Planning Board's comments may impact project design, this checklist is provided to encourage early consideration of these areas of concern by applicants to avoid project changes later. For information on the County Planning Board review process and to access an electronic copy of this checklist, go online to www.westchestergov.com/planningreferrals or contact Lukas Herbert at lah5@westchestergov.com. I. COUNTY PLANNING BOARD POLICIES: Written policies underlie all recommendations of the County Planning Board. Westchester 2025_Context far County acid Municipal Planning and Policies to Guide County Planning,adopted by the County Planning Board on 5/6108,amended 115110,can be found at ww.westchestergov.com/2025. n Westchester 2025:Policies should be reviewed to determine how they relate to the development proposal. II. IMPACTS TO COUNTY FACILITIES AND SERVICES: The County Planning Board coordinates the review of development projects with Westchester County departments to identify and address potential impacts on County services and infrastructure.In some situations, permits and approvals may be required that could change project design. Site Plan Checklist Page 4 of Project Address C (100 0 C,1C_ ❑ Map of County Facilities: Review the State& County Roads and Parks map (which also includes county channel lines) to identify proximity to County facilities at: www.westchestergov.com/planningdocs/pdfmaps/countystateroadsparks.pdf. Other useful map links for information about environmental features, septic/sewer map, county sewer districts map, etc can be found at: www.westchestergov.com/maps ❑ COUNTY ROAD: Applications for development on sites that abut"a County road must be submitted for review by the County Department of Public Works. Information and forms can be found at: www.westchestergov.com/dpwibldgperm.htm. Former County Roads do not need review by the Department of Public Works,but will still likely trigger a review by the County Planning Board. ❑ COUNTY CHANNEL LINES: Applications for development on sites within 100 feet of designated County Channel Line require a stream control permit from the County Department of Public Works. Information and forms can be found at: www.westchestergov.com/dpw/bldgperm.htm ❑ COUNTY PARK: New construction & land alteration projects adjacent to County parks are expected to address screening& buffer of new uses from the park, as appropriate. Stormwater should not drain from a developed site onto a County park without acceptable quantity and quality controls.County parks are designated as Critical Environmental Areas. ❑ SEWAGE TREATMENT AT COUNTY TREATMENT PLANT: Local municipalities are required to reduce and eliminate inflow and infiltration(I&1)into the sanitary sewage systems tributary to County treatment plants.New development will be expected to reduce I&I in relation to generation of new flow at a ratio of three to one. This requirement must be discussed with local officials. ❑BEE-LINE BUS SERVICE: Bee-Line bus stops serving a development site should be identified on plans or noted if located off-site. If a bus stop is located along the site's frontage, the applicant should contact the County Department of Transportation to discuss impacts and the need for improvements. Safe and separate pedestrian access should be provided to link a bus stop and sidewalk with building entrances. Information on County bus service and design guidelines can be found at: westchestergov.com/transportation/images/Bus%20 Service%2OGuidelines.pdf ❑FAIR AND AFFORDABLE HOUSING: Many municipalities require, inclusion of fair & affordable units in new developments. Financial assistance to achieve fair & affordable housing development is available through Westchester County & other sources.Applications that include new residential units to be affirmatively marketed & sold or rented subject to fair& affordable housing provisions should be tied to Westchester County guidelines on affordability including income guidelines of eligible households that can be found at: http://homes.westchestergov.com/. If County funding is sought to develop fair & affordable housing,the County Board of Legislators must be included as an involved agency under SEQR. ❑RECYCLING: New buildings must contain a designated area of sufficient size for separation and storage of recyclables and trash.Building expansions should also include sufficient space for separation and storage of recyclables.For more information about County recycling requirements go to:www.westchestergov.com/environment_recycling.htm El STORM SEWER SYSTEM: Any connections to.a County storm sewer line will require a permit from the Department of Public Works in accordance with the County Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination (IDDE) law. Information & forms can be found at: www.westchestergov.com/dpw/bldgperm.htm Non-stormwater discharges to the County storm sewer system are prohibited. III.DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS The County Planning Board's land use policies focus attention on several aspects of development that may have intermunicipal and quality of life impacts.The list below includes areas most frequently commented on by the County Planning Board. ❑WATER: All development plans should include sufficient provisions for stormwater management, water quality measures and mitigation of flooding. ❑Plans should identify the major drainage basin or watershed the site is located in (Croton River, Upper Hudson River, Lower Hudson,Upper Long Island Sound,Bronx River and Lower Long Island Sound). An interactive map with watershed boundaries can be found at www.westchestergov.com/planning/maps&lists/drainbasinsl lxl7.htm1 ❑Watershed plans have been developed for several of the County's watersheds - the Croton, Indian Brook-Croton Gorge, Bronx River & Long Island Sound watersheds - that include specific recommendations that apply to development projects. See recommendations in watershed plans at:planning.westchestergov.com/index.php?option=com content&task-=view&id= 1231& Itemid=2204 Site Plan Checklist Page 5 of 7 Project Address �AC a� 1CSECZ ❑Development that involves filling, creation of impervious surfaces or buildings and substantive loss of natural vegetation in a floodplain or flood prone area should be avoided. ❑Above ground, vegetated retention/detention basins or devices are preferred because they perform better,are easier to inspect and maintain and provide additional environmental benefits over subsurface structural devices. Any such treatments should not be constructed within wetlands or buffer areas around wetlands. El The development should treat and retain as much stormwater on-site as possible,particularly when the site is located in a drainage basin with known flooding problems. A Construction Stormwater Toolbox with tools and sources of technical information related to the construction activities and stormwater management best practices is available from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation at: www.dec.ny.gov/chemical/8694.htmi ❑New development should include protection of aquatic resources. For more information about protection of aquatic resourc-es & buffer areas,go to: planning.westchestergov.com/index.php?option=com content&task-view&id=1491&ltemid=2458 ❑Impervious cover should be minimized. Permeable paving surfaces should be used where feasible. Vegetative rain gardens should be used, particularly in areas of overland or channelized stormwater flow, to improve stormwater quality and reduce runoff volume. For more information,go to: www.westchestergov.com/stonnwater ❑Buildings along coastlines and low lying area should consider the impacts of sea level rise. Specific consideration is required of potential impacts to surface and subsurface drinking water supplies. ❑ SITE LAYOUT. Aesthetic design,building orientation and community character should be considered in the site layout and building appearance. El In most locations,buildings should face the street and have pedestrian access from the street. ❑Commercial buildings should be located near the front street line with the majority of parking located in the rear of the building. Even gas stations and convenience stores should be upfront in a landscaped setting with parking,pumps and canopy toward the rear. ❑Buildings should be of pedestrian-scale when seen from the sidewalk. ❑Building facades should contribute to and enhance the character of the community. ❑Driveway and pathway connections should be provided to adjacent sites when possible and crosseasements provided. ❑ STREETS. Street design should reduce unwarranted paving and promote connectivity. ❑New streets should connect with adjacent streets wherever feasible to prevent the proliferation of dead-end streets and promote neighborhood integration. ❑Connections could be vehicular or pedestrian/bicycle only,where appropriate. ❑Street widths should be minimized for streets with low traffic volume to reduce speeds and impervious surfaces. Lane widths of 12 feet are only appropriate for major roadways. ❑Driveway widths should be no more than 9 feet to reduce impervious surfaces. ❑Permeable paving surfaces should be used where feasible. ❑ GREEN TECHNOLOGY.New development should include as many green building elements as possible,such as:renewable building materials,energy efficient heating/cooling systems and fixtures,water saving devices,green roofs and permeable paving surfaces. Information can be obtained from the U.S. Green Building Council at: www.usgbc.org. ❑ LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING.The site improvements should enhance community character. Site Plan Checklist Page 6 of 7 Project Address &9aPQoc.k- r) ❑ Landscaping should consist of native plant species appropriate for the location. Invasive plant species should be prohibited. Invasive plant information available at:www.westchestergov.com/planning/environmental/Reports/InvasiveplantsBrochO8.pdf ❑ Pollutant tolerant plantings should effectively shield parking,loading areas and refuse collection sites. ❑ Site lighting should be provided at the lowest safe levels and lowest heights,avoiding all spillage off site. ❑ PEDESTRIANS. Safe,convenient and ADA accessible pedestrian access is provided. ❑ A sidewalk should be provided along the site frontage along each street. ❑ Direct pedestrian connections should be made from the front of the building to the sidewalk. Pedestrian crossings of drive-ways& parking lots should be minimized or avoided. If they must be provided,painted crosswalks should be provided through parking.lots. ❑ ADA accessibility must be provided. ❑ BICYCLISTS.Provisions for bicyclists should be incorporated into project design. ❑ Bicycle parking should be provided in commercial and residential developments. Guidelines can be found at: www.apbp.org/resoureetresmgr/publications/bi cycl e_parking_guidel ines.pdf ❑ If near a trailway or bicycle route, extra consideration should be given to bicycle accessibility such as bike lanes on internal roadways,bicycle parking and other umenities. ❑ Drive-thru lanes at uses such as banks and fast-food restaurants should also be accessible for bicycles. Waiver: Upon finding by the Building inspector, Village Engineer, Planning Board or Board of Trustees that, due to the particular character or limited nature of development or change in use or to special conditions peculiar to a site,the submission of a final site plan, or certain portions of information normally required as part of the site development plan, is inappropriate or unnecessary or that strict compliance with said submission requirements will cause extraordinary and unnecessary hardship, such official or Board may waive such submission requirements wherever, in the opinion of such official or Board, such waiver will be consistent with the goal of promoting the public health, safety and general welfare of the community. The findings for granting such waiver shall become a part of the public record. Any waiver request must he made in writing,and include sufficient detailed information for the appropriate authority to make an informed decision. Design Professional's Certification of Completion of Cheeldist I have fully reviewed the Village of Rye Brook's requirements and certify this application to be a complete submission. I understand that an incomplete plat or incomplete checklist shall be deemed an incomplete fission and shall be returned to the applicant upon determination of such by the appropriate authority. � R�D A Name(Print) 1\Y-\ c rle t Signature E Date Professional Seal Site Plan Checklist Page 7 of 7 BUILDING PARTMENT VLL ' _ Oox 938 KING R B� alb,NY I0573 (914)93, 4 (91� 9-5801 Elff SJ 1982 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: : Approval Date: Permit# :Application # Y Approval Signature: : ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD. Disapproved: i Date: 11 BOT Approval Date: Case # :Chairman: 1 P8 Approval Date: Case # :Secretary: ZBA Approval Date: Case # Other: Application Fee; Permit Fees: Exterior Building Permit Application Application dated: is hereby made to the Building Inspector of the Village of Rye Brook,NY,for the issuance of a Permit for the construction of buildings,structures,additions,alterations or for a change in use,as per detailed statement described below. 1. JobAddress: ( NO>ae-Y— KIVpcQ 2. ParcelID#: ZZ- Zone: 3. Proposed Improvement(Describe in detail): V _ Vj A ICU D W x" 151 C 4. Property Owner: J64 MIM, IM, Address: �J & rkygo-' lz'p�q /` y Phone# Cell# e-mail-)gLtiA-kie- Wag-- SMC M$'54451' .Lem List All Other Properties Owned in Rye Brook: Applicant: J614LI Address: 33 (31PM H11,L gaAP Phone# C//,9F 3—J7 5 D Cell#� 14 -1 14--015 2— Architect: Architect: J5" Address: Phone# Cell# e-mail Engineer: Address: Phone# Cell# e-mail General Contractor: Address: Phone# Cell# e-mail �1) . 214/2015 5. Occupancy; (1 Fam.,2-Fam.,CommereiaL,etc...)Pre-construction: I FR'P4 Post-construction: [ l rt-sal 6. Area of lot: Square feet: ( 'j 6 Si, la Acres: 5-5 7. Dimensions from proposed building or structure to lot lines: front yard: �g �" rear yard: right side yard: 9 -I– left side yard: ? , I other: S. If building is located on a corner lot,which street sloes it front on: 9. Area of proposed building in square feet: Basement: 1S1fl: ZI 'L5-2nd fl: Z 25 3`d fl: 0 10. Total Square Footage of the proposed new construction: G� 5 11. For additions,total square footage added:Basement: 0 1"fl: Z-1 5 2"d fl: [ �Z Z� 3`d fl: f3 12. Total Square Footage of the proposed renovation to the existing structure: 10'25- 13. N.Y.State Construction Classification: 12T, N.Y.State Use Classification: ' 14. Construction Type&Location: (4Typicai stern Lumber Frame;()Timber Frame ITC];()Wood Truss[TT]; (#Pre-engineered wood[PW];Located; Floor Framing[F];()Roof Framing IR];()Floor&Roof Framing [FR]; Other: 15. Number of stories: Overall Height: Median Height: l S 16. Basement to be full,or partial: 5f3 finished or unfinished: 17. What material is the exterior finish: lel C{,k�$trt�i 18. Roof style;peaked,hip,mansard,shed,etc: Roofing material: 'nttll� /IIC 19. What system of heating: Pbr WFtTL-JE•- 20. If private sewage disposal is necessary,approval by the Westchester County Health Department must be submitted with this application. 21. Will the proposed project require the installation of new,or an extensiontmodification to an existing automatic fire suppression system?(Fire Sprinkler,ANSI,System,FM-200 System,Type I Hood,etc...)Yes: No:_ fifyes,applicant must submit a separate Automatic Fire Suppression.System Permit application&2 sets ofdetailed engineered plans) 22. Will the proposed project disturb 400 sq.ft.or more of land,or create 400 sq.ft.or more of in)pervious coverage requiring a Stormwater Management Control Permit as per§217 of Village Code? Yes: V No:—Area: 23. Will the roposed project require a Site Plan Review by the Village Planning Board as per§209 of Village Code? Yes: 7 No: (ifyes,applicant must submit a Site Plan Application,&provide detailed drawings) / 24. Will the proposed project require a Steep Slopes Permit as per§213 of Village Code Yes: No: V (ifyes,you must submit a Site Plan Application,&provide a detailed topographical survey) 25. Is the lot located within 100 ft.of a Wetland as per§245 of Village Code? Yes: No: Y (ifyes,the area of wetland and the wetland buffer zone must beproperly depicted on the survey&site plan) / 26. Is the lot or any portion thereof located in a Flood Plane as per the FIRM Map dated 9/28107? Yes: No: ✓ (ifyes,the area and elevations of the flood plane must be properly depicted oil the survey&site plan) / 27. Will the proposed project require a Tree Removal Permit as per§235 of Village Code?Yes: No: V (ifyes,applicant must submit a Tree Removal Permit Application) /� 28. Does the proposed project involve a Home-Occupation as per§250-38 of Village Code? Yes: No: V! Indicate:TIER 1: TIER II: TIER III: (ifyes,a Home Occupation Pennit Application is required) 29. What is the total estimated cost of construction: $ Note:estimated cost shall include all site improvements,labor,material,scaffolding,fired equipment,professional fees,including any material and labor which may be donated gratis_If thefnnal cost exceeds lite estimated cost,an additional fee will be required prior to issuance of the C/O. 30. Estimated date of completion: (2) 2/4/2015 BUILDING DEPARTMENT VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK 938 KING STREET RYE BRoox,NY 10573 (914)939-0668 FAX(914)939-5801 RESIDENTIAL LOT AREA COVERAGE Address: Prm00LK- Section: 13 S• 3� Block: ( Lot: Z Z- PERMITTED COVERAGE RATIOS IN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS Local Law 3-88 YOUR ZONE AREA IN MAIN ACCESS. DECK ZONE DISTRICT SQ. FEET BLDG. BLDG. MAX. CHECK MAX. R-25 25,000 14% 3.5% 4% R-20 20,000 14% 3.5% 4% R-15 15,000 16% 3.5% 4% R-1 5A 15,000 12% 3.5% 4% R-12 12,500 17% 4% 4% R-10 10,000 20% 4.5% 3.5% R-7 7,500 23% 4.5% 3.5% R-5 5,000 30% 1 5% 3.5°/a R-2F 5,000 30% 5% 3.5% Existing: Proposed: 1. AREA OF LOT 15-051. U,_Sq. Ft. l Y0 51. b Sq. Ft. 2. AREA OF HOUSE a. Coverage of Main Building t (Including Attached Garage or Accessory Building) b Sq. Ft. Z.�Z�-g-5S Ft. b. Area of 1 rt Floor Divided By Area of Lot x 100 _% [4-J % 3. AREA OF ACCESSORY BUILDING (includes Detached Garages,Tool Shed,Playhouses) Sq. Ft. 0 Sq. Ft. a. Coverage of Accessory Building Area of Accessory Building Divided By Area of Lot x 100 4. AREA OF DECK 0 Sq. Ft. Sq. Ft. a. Coverage of Deck Area of Deck Divided By Area of Lot x 100 �J % % I attest to the best of my knowledge and belief, the above information is correct. --41 Arehitect°s Si cr — (3) 211©/2©15 BUILDING DEPARTMENT VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK 938 KING STREET RYE BROOK,NY 10573 (914) 939-0668 Fax(914) 939-5801 IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE RATIOS RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS Address: (o PA-01)oG,✓ 1264V Section: 135-P3`>- Block: f Lot: 2-'-7 Zone: ImPERvtous SuRFAcEs (Definition): All buildings, as defined herein, and all areas on the ground or elevated above the ground which are comprised of materials through which water cannot readily flow, including, but not limited to asphalt, concrete, masonry, wood, gravel and clay, and which consist of elements including, but not limited to, court yards, sports courts, swimming pools,patios, sidewalks,ramps, terraces and driveways. TOTAL NIAXI~MUiV1 PERMITTED MAX. PERM= COVERAGE Zoning ]IMPERVIOUS LOT AREA BY EVIPERVIOUS SURFACES District COVERAGE IN FRONT (sq.ft.) For Base Lot For Lot Area YARD C%) Area (sq.ft.)* Over Base R-25 20 Lot Area(%) R-20 30 0 to 4,000 0 55 R-15 35 4,001 to 6,000 2,200 35 6,001 to 12,000 2,900 27 RISA 35 12,001 to 16,000 4,520 26 R 12 40 16,00.1 to 20,000 5,560 25 R-10 45 20,001 to 30,000 6,560 24 30,001 to 40,000 8,960 23 R-7 40 40,001 &larger 11,260 22 R5 30 R2-F 30 *"Base Lot Area"is the mininium end of the lot size range in the"Lot Area" column Area of lot: 157 0 St , P- sq.ft. Existing Allowed Proposed Total impervious coverage = 1-7i- S .ft. �13 S , ft. S .ft. Front impervious coverage = % j`a % �! � I attest to the best of my knowledge and belief,the above information is correct. chitect's Signature (4) 2/10/2015 BUILDING DEPARTMENT VILLAGE OP RYE BROOK 938 KING STREET RYE BROOK,NY 10573 (914)939-4668 FAX(914)939-5801 BULK REGULATIONS IN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS Address: 0 CIGr" t2OA-P Section: f_65'- Block: Lot: Z-7— MAXIMUM GROSS FLOOR AREA USE FORMULA: Maximum Gross Floor Area =4,000 f [(Lot Area—21,780) x 0.11478421 ]: a. Allowed _ 32-2-7. Sq. Feet b. Existing — N I O. z-5' Sq, f=eet c. Proposed = 3 Sq. Feet HEIGHT/SETBACK RATIOS FOR RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS DEFINITION: A standard designed to regulate the height of a building in relation to the average grade of the corresponding portion of the lot line from which it is set back. The ratio modifies the maximum permitted Height of Building by forming an inclined plane beginning at the average grade along the portion of the lot line from which the setback is measured and rising toward the building at the specified ratio above which no part of any building, other than minor architectural features such as chimneys, skylights and dormer windows not covering more than 10%of the entire roof area,shall be permitted to extend. Height and Setback shall be calculated using the formula; Height:/Setback-_X, where X is the required side or front yard ratio for the zoning district in which a property is located as specified in Article Vlll of Chapter 250. A complete elevation view for the proposed improvement must be included on the drawings. FILL IN YOUR RATIOS: ZONE E.X/.STWO PROPOSED AEQU/RED FRONT: FRONT: FRONT: .48 1725 SIDE: SIDE: SIDE: 1.30 FRONT: FRONT: FRONT: .60 1720 SIDE: SIDE: SIDE: 1.60 FRONT: ,43 FRONT: - 07-3 FRONT: .60 1715 SIDE:i�l� I .f� SIDE: �,1'I 2► SIDE: 1.50 FRONT: FRONT: FRONT. .80 1715A SIDE: SIDE: SIDE: 2.40 FRONT: FRONT: FRONT: .69 17=12 SIDE: SIDE: SIDE: 1.60 FRONT: FRONT: FRONT: .80 ,R-10 SIDE: SIDE: SIDE: 2.40 FRONT: FRONT: FRONT: .96 177 SIDE: SIDE: SIDE: 3.00 FRONT: FRONT: FRONT: 1.20 175 SIDE: SIDE: SIDE: 4.00 FRONT: FRONT: FRONT: 1.20 172F SIDE: SIDE: SIDE: 4.00 1 attest to the best of my knowledge and belief,the above information is correct. Architect's Signire (5) z/I4120I5 This application must be properly completed in its entirety by a N.Y. State Registered Architect or I .Y. State Licensed Professional Engineer & signed by those professionals where indicated. It must also include the notarized signature(s) of the legal owner(s) of the subject property, and the applicant of record in the spaces provided. Any application not properly completed in its entirety and/or not properly signed shall be deemed null and void, and will be returned to the applicant. Please note that application fees are non-refundable. STATE OF NEW YORK,COUNTY OF WESTCEESTER ) as: leb4114 Cr 5CA41`-D J9- ,being duly sworn, deposes and states that he/she is the applicant above named, (print name of individual signing as the applicant) and further states that (s)he is the legal owner of the property to which this application pertains, or that (s)he is the �--1 I:Lm� for the legal owner and is duly authorized to make and file this application. (indicate architect,contractor,agent,attorney,eta.) That all statements contained herein are true to the best of his/her knowledge and belief, and that any work performed, or use conducted at the above captioned property will be in conformance with the details as set forth and contained in this application and in any accompanying approved plans and specifications, as well as in accordance with the New York State Uniform Fire Prevention&Building Code, the Code of the Village of Rye Brook and all other applicable laws,ordinances and regulations. Sworn to before me this 244 Sworn to before me this day of _Q eZe% Gr , 20 day of , 20 Sigh Wierty Owner Signature of Applicant Print Name of Property Owner Print Name of Applicant rlr�r-� atary Public Notary Public MAME MLON NOTAfiY PUBLIC TATE OF EW ILII riTsrcH�srE� n , �i (6) DLRL l t r _, MENT VII, E` ER ROOK 938 KIIVGpi r R BRcly ,NY 10573 (914)91 -68' r 39-5801 • +`lUd ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD CHECK LIST FOR APPLICANTS This form must be completed and signed by the applicant of record and a copy shall be . submitted to the Building Department prior to attending the ARB meeting. Applicants failing to submit a copy of this check list will be removed from the ARB agenda. Job Address p40P0 CIr— 1DAP Phone#-6 1 �-7--'I 5 5-0 Parcel ID#: Zone: _ ?S - Date of Submission: Proposed Improvement(Describe in detail): APPLICANT CLAECK LIST: The following items must be submitted to the Building Department with the application-no exceptions. I. ( )Completed Application 2. ( )Eight(8)sets of sealed plans. (mmr_r.size=36'x42') Property Owner:._JNI Wirtx c!� � 3. ( )Eight(8)copies of the property survey. Address: 6 PAVVeGr- le0� 4. ( )Eight(8)copies of the proposed site plan. S. ( )One electronic/disc copy of the complete Phone# 6¢6) — '3°j S� application materials. Applicant appearing before the Board: 6. ( )Filing Fee. 7. ( )Any supporting documentation. 8. ( )HOA approval Ietter. (ifapplicable) Address: 33 ai,+{ 1t_( i� 9. ( }Photographs. tea 4 10.( )Samples of finishes/color chart.(a sample board or Phone# �4 7 •-"� ""� model may be presented the night of the meeting) Architect/Engineer: dow G 5cAR.t,Ai-6;jY-- By signature below, the owner/applicant acknowledges that he/she has read the complete Building Permit Instructions&Procedures,and that their application is complete in all respects.The Board of Review reserves the right to refuse to hear any application not meeting the requirements contained herein. Sworn to before me this 3 Sworn to before me this day of �GCCyl�GJ , 20 day of ' 20 z�f7w--'� ;SignaZW,rcqo xmc Signature ofAppplicant �Gc�L �1 e 11� �6144 to 5S ,1�I"�3 .�,�Name of Property Owner Print Name ofAppllcant Notary Public Natary Public MAWE YELLON NOTARYPUBUG STATEOFNEWYONK� S1F.STCF3Ea Cbl] (i ./ 1YES216015 100MULEM-, MOM IS, This form must be properly completed & notarized by the Design Professional of record and the Property Owner. Failure to provide this completed form with your permit application will delay the permitting process. Notice of Utilization of Truss Type, Pre-Engineered Wood, or Timber Frame Construction. Title 19 Part 1254 & 1265 NYCRR To: The Building Inspector of the Village of Rye Brook. From: ]dh n 5 fir- Subject Property: r FigDD©c r— �,qo SBL: 13 . 3'f-!-ZZZone: tz-/,�- Please take notice that the subject;^One or Two Family; ❑ Commercial, ❑ New Structure ❑ Addition to an Existing Structure ❑ Rehabilitation to an Existing Structure to be constructed or performed at the subject property will utilize; ❑ Truss Type Construction(TT) 'Pre-Engineered Wood Construction(I''VV) ❑ Timber Construction(TC) in the following loeation(s); Floor Framing, including Girders&Beams (F) ❑ Roof Framing(R) ❑ Floor Framing and Roof Framing (FR) Please nate that prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy, the subject:dwelling or building utilizing truss type, pre-engineered wood, or timber construction must be posted with a Truss Identification Sign, installed in conformance with NYCRR§iz6l for Commercial Buildings, and NYCRR§1265 for One & Two Family D%vellings. Date Design Professional Date Property Owner Date Notary Public e RYE ACRES COMPANY R=1129. 90' L=107. 47' 1 0.5' Split Rail Fence 0.4,E • —_234———————---—— 1,3' ��aaa4aaaaaaaaaaaaaaai�Tree ,l*�20"Tre ^„ Arborvites aaas ��-...�•�'.^- --235-— _. .^-i•- p - �30"Tree O O -.� O .236. m Lot 3 15051.6 Sq. Feet ,-237- N y ��3 n n �"----r� \ ✓....•-238..-._—_—— _ Stone Wall �r� Stone Wali —— — U 1 ) } mm 241.3' ) 241.6' ——----.— , 24"Tree •� / "242"•• — \ 0' 242,2' — + 242T � Lot 2 10.1,E Unit `\ Lot 4 241,6' Wood 241.7' 12"Tree beck Wood .l' Plat. a 1 1/2 Story Frame Dwelling 3No. 6 \ d Frame m FF EC 242:+i-"- `--�-- -- - ---- `-= Garage m 9.2' C= Roof Over _ GF EI. 242.7 — '""'" ___. """"" """" •"""' 242.3' \ an er +242.6' SLJ _ 12"Tr a;`:':}`:;` '' `'.' :` X09' -243 ..._._— J.-- 6'Tree L Tww112.O m2"Tree.- Zo N i':'¢::;...:t;:i;•: -245--..` • 61 T. �o 176.76' — -246- .:'. .: :.' 10"Trea '" 0 10" r9a — L=93. 21' U.P. — Ede of Pavement 247.2' �`---'.- ------ 246.9' f o'� Q�. PADDOCK ROAD Richard A. Spin 'e c��PorD A. 650 Halstead Avenue ' {; '2� f General Notesi Mamaroneck, N. Y. 10543 j;l'f`� �a ,+•�� -Etevatlons shown in NAVD1988 (914) 381-2357 -Only visible utlUtles shown Y -Contractor is to visit site and verify N.Y.S. Lic. Land Surveyor No. 49240 ice:' alt existingconditions (Includfn under round `chi 92c `� / utilities, pipes, etc) g 9 SND yi` -Verification and field Marking of location of Survey of Lot 3 as shown on "Map of existing utilities Is required prior to commencment Section A, Rye Acres, the Property of Rye of work and is the responsibility of the contractor Acres Company situated in the Town of Rye, -Unauthorized additions to or alterations of this Westchester Co., N. Y." plan is a violation of Section 7209 of the N.Y.S. Filed on Oct. 13, 1949 as Map No. 6921 Education Law. Scale 1"=20' October 15, 2015 32/4661 "RYEACRES" VI.LLAts`xuvx 938 KINGS off,NY 10573 9-5801 (914)91". ". 77 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY:. Permit# .Application # Approval Date: Approval signature. ; ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD. Date: Disapproved: B07 Approval Date: Case # :Chairman: PB Approval Date: Case # :Secretary: zBA Approval Date: Case # Other: Application Fee: Permit pees: Exterior Buildin Permit A lication Application dated: is hereby made to the Building inspector of the Village of Rye Brook,NY,for the issuance of a permitfor the construction of buildings,structures,additions,alterations or for a change in usc,as per detailed statement described below. 1. .tobAddress• �� 1~ZZ- Zone: 2. ParcelID#: � �- Ct r 3. Proposed Improvement(Describe in detail): 1 13 i~ W A(,V iTl s G�l�-�c- �I u�- �t N FI&� t ll'fi q„y T�aY i� cl lZ On, unf Gig AC'L G 4. Property Owner• QGl-l1k k MSUE Address: (0 Phone# Cell#_ � i _ e-mail � �'I,LEr�I W �TGhCc�`c List All Other Properties Owned in Rye Brook: Applicant: d ! � S ,F� J�- Address: . -33 04 'AMA ll iL r e-mail Phone# Zr•7 —� S Cell# 60[1�4, -114--0)5 Z Architect- Address: Phone# Cell# e-mail Engineer- Address: Phone# Cell# e-mall General Contractor: Address: Phone# Cell# e-mail E�) 2/4/2015 S. Occupancy.(I-Fam.,2-Fatn.,ConuneroiaL u,etc...)Pre-construcr� ,: r ' Acres* F 6. Area of lot: Square feet: ¢ rear an ' fr 7. Dimensions from proposed building or str arm re to lot lines: other rd: �• Y right side yard: _ left side y ___—.------ 8. If building is located on a corner lot,which street does it front on.S` �� t.��2nd fi: +�, 25 3rd 11: .0 9. Area of proposed building in square feet: Basement: 1 tl: Z��•_ --------� -- 10. Total Square Footage of the proposed new construction:square footage added:Basement: 15►fl• Z _2nd fl: ( L i• 3`d fl:Q____..".-.- 11. For additions,total sqp structure: 12. Total Square Footage of the proposed renovation to the existing N.Y.State Use Classification. 13. N.Y.State Construction Classification: Timber Frame[TC];()Wood Truss [TT] Type&Location:(Typical stern Lumber Frame;() 14. Construction Typ ()Roof Framing[RJ.()Floor&Roof Framing[FRJ i ( Pre-enginecred wood[PWJ;Located, Floor Framing[F]; Other: Median Height: �G 5 r overall Height: 15. Number of stories: , finished or unfinished: 16. Basement to be full,or partial: It-1` G Ic-n 6v�� 17. What material is the exterior finish: Roofing;material:_-T 18. Roof style;peaked,hip,mansard,shed,etc: 19. What system of heating: dis osal is necessary,approval by the Westchester County Health Department must be submitted With 20. If private sewageP this application. automatic fire System,FM-200 System,Type I Hood,etc...Wes: Na: 21. Will the proposed project require the installation of a new,or an extension/modification to an existing engineeredplans) suppression system?(Fire Sprinkler,ANSI,Sy (i fyes,applicant must submit a separate Aummatie Fire Suppression System Pene 4application00sr mor fdeta ervious coverage _ _Area- ter 22. Will the proposed project disturb 400 sq.ft.or more of land,or create q . requiring a Stormvvater Management Control Permit as per§217 of Village Cgoard s e per§209 of Village Code9 require a Site Plan Review by the Village Planning 23. Will the proposed project Yes: �/ No: �. fify�•applicant must submit¢Site Plan Application,&provide detailed drawings) Stec Slopes Permit as per§213 of Village Cade Yes: Nn: 24, Will the proposed project require p rovide a detailed topographical survey) {f yes,you must submit a Site Plan Applic¢tion,&p 25. Is the lot located within l00 ft.of a Wetland as per§245 of Village Code? Yes: Nos t es,the area of wetland and lite wetland buffer zone must be properly depicted on the survey&site plan) f.fy pdated 9128107? Yes: No: 26. Is the lot or any portion thereof located in a Flood Plane as per the FIRM Map eY&site lap (if yes,the area and elevations of the•flood plane must be properly depicte r o3 of he Village Code?Yes: No' 27. Will the proposed project require a Tree Removal Permit as per§ {if yes,applicant must submit a Tree Removal Pennit Application) i yes,a Home occupation pennitApplication is required) 28. Does the proposed project involve a HTR HI:_ upatio l.f s per§250-38 of Village Code? Yes: o: Indicate:TIER I: TIER H: Note:estimated cost shall include 29. What is the total estimated cost or construction: $-.,— r o essional fees,including¢rty material and labor which may be all site improvements,labor,material,scaffolding,fixed equpment,p'f donated gratis-If the final cost exceeds the estimated cost,an additional fee will be required prior to issuance of the CIO. 30. Estimated date of completion: (2) 214!20 This application muss: be properly £omPlet'rdu oil Architect or N.Y. State Licensed Professional Engineer re s signed®the legal own r(s) cal the subject indicated. It must also include the notarized s�gnatu { application not properly property, and the applicant of record a he spaces provided. Any ly geed shall bed erred null and void, and will be completed in its entirety and/or icant. Please note that application flees are non-refundable. returned to the app STATE OF NEW YY�ORK Com TYCO E TCBES`I ER } �: uses and states that he/she is the applicant above named, 44 -0 9.. being duly sworn, deposes (P t name o€individual signing as Else applicant) to which this application pertains, or that (s)he is the and further states that (s)he is the legal owner of the property G -L - for the legal owner and is duly authorized to make and file this application. _...-._ (indicate architect,contractor,agent,attorney,etc.) That all statements codtained-herein-are hat any work perfo e true to the,best of hi vUath the-details-as-send t-f-forth and-contain ed in this - T will be in conformance use conducted at the above captioned propertyspecifications, as well as in accordance with the New York State application and in any accompanying approved plans and Fire Prevention&Building Code,the Code of the Village of Rye Brook and all other applicable Laws, ordinances Uniform and regulations. 2 Sworn to before me this Sworn to before me this �" ' 2�� �" �, 20 �� day of day of _�__�...--- tgnatura of Appltn e�rOwner Sit�' - P h' Print Name of Applicant Print Name of Property Owner No P blit )Oj�P6ublic pg'rFR 3.CHH _W YORK teARCkEYEtl.Oti "�-.._--- �q-rp,t3Y PUBt-iG,5'l'A'r�OF � NOTAHYPl161JC TATE OF NEW YORK N 6308766 GOUN H-ES[CN SEER p. O S CW r coMVfES'rC4i��3tltY 28,gyp, (ZUA.LIF�1551UN EXPIRE tAY CQM (6) 2.i( SUYLD�I [C ,� m`JL " \OOK : NY 10573 938 KING pp (914)91, f�6s8 ,g; 39-ssol 0 :(r ARCHITECTURAL �,���EBOARD CHECKLIST FOR hand � copy be . This loran m��� be completed and signed by the applicant of record and Applicants submitted to the Building Department prior ®i be removed from the ARBttending the ARB A agenda.failing to submit a copy of this check hair� Job Address:_ P�4D [!Cr— ! Phone# Zone:--9--j5- ##: � ,'� -- Date of Submissiov. Parcel ID Proposed improvement(Describe in detail): APl'LICAwT CHECK LIST: The following items must be submitted to the Building Department with the application-no exceptions. 1. ( )Completed Application 2. ( }Eight(8)sets of sealed plans. (urax.size=36".r421') Property Owner: Jc11 3. { )Eight(8)copies of the property survey. 4. { )Eight(8)copies of the proposed site plan. Address: Pttvfl--Cr- gon, S. ( }One electronic/disc copy of the complete Phone# +� `)` S application materials. 6. { )Filing Fee. Applicant appearing before the Board: 7 ( )Any supporting documentation- 64A ocumentation_ �e 1 l 8. ( )HOA approval letter. (f applicable) ��rs�� b .—. . � ., 9. ( )Photographs. Address4lo.( ) Samples of finishes/color chart. (a sample board or ►f!�e model may bepresented the night of the meeting) Fhone# !q Z`7 Architect/Engineer: 6 5(u4z Mb— y B signature below, the owner/applicant acknowledges that helshe has read the complete Building Permit instructions&Procedures,and that their application is complete armed herein. of Review reserves the right to refuse to hear any application not meeting the requirements con 2 Swom to before me this Sworn to before me this , 2Q� day of t,G6N�4� .¢r/' , 20 day of �.'d� of Applicant Signature o o Ely Me Print Name of Applicant nt Name of Property Owner n r Notary Pubiic Notary Public 1'E CBR CHO WW YORK LIC,6TATF-OF NF NOTARY 6208766 COt3hk-n NO. Ot S- QIJALIFIED IN WESYCH7✓S t>rFt MI1ACtEYE74A3� Y DAY rzommis 10N g)CI'IR88 IIJLY 28:201 140YAAY FUSU� MDFriEW YYO�RK AEMH co COMM.EXP. 2/10/201 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK 93 8 KING STREET RYE BROOK,NY 10573 (914)939-0668 FAx(914)939-5801 RESIDENTIAL LOT AREA COVERAGE Address: G P�N1��ri�t� Section: s• f f Block: I ..Lot: ?-7-._ PERMITTED COVERAGE RATIOS IN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS Local Law 3-88 YOUR ZONE AREA IN MAIN ACCESS. DECK ZONE DISTRICT SQ. FEET BLDG. BLDG. MAX. CHECK MAX R-25 25,000 14% 3.5% 4% R-20 20,000 14% 3.5% 4% R-15 15,000 16% 3.5% 4% R-1 5A 15,000 12% 3.5% 4% R-12 12,500 17% 4% 4% R-10 10,000 20% 4.5% 3.5% R-7 7,500 23% 4.5% 3.5% R-6 5,000 30% 5% 3.5% R-2F 5,000 30% 5% 3.5% Existin : Proposed: 1. AREA OF LOT 15-051 . ' Sq. Ft. I V 51. b Sq. Ft. 2. AREA OF HOUSE a. Coverage of Main Building (including Attached Garage or Accessory Building) ��• Sq. Ft. 2 L eZ5 Sq. Ft. b. Area of 15t Floor Divided By Area of Lot x 100 �2_•� —% � 4'+� % 3. AREA OF ACCESSORY BUILDING (includes Detached Garages,Tool Shed, Playhouses) Sq. Ft. SCI. Ft. a. Coverage of Accessory Building Area of Accessory Building Divided By Area of Lot x 100 4. AREA OF DECK a Sq. Ft. 3 Sq. Ft. a. Coverage of Deck Area of Deck Divided By Area of Lot x 100 ?J" % -"�" °/n I attest to the best of my knowledge and belief, the above information is correct. chitect's Si e (3) 2110/2015 BUILDING DEPARTMENT VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK 938 KING STREET RYE BROOK,NY 10573 (914) 939-0668 Fax(914) 939-5801 IMPERVIOUSCOVERAGE RATIOS RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS Address: rs PADDoGIL P-0,W Section: 135, '3 1- Block: 1 Lot: LZ Zone: P-/5- IMPERVIOUS SURFACES (Definition): All buildings, as defined herein, and all areas on the ground or elevated above the ground which are comprised of materials through which water cannot readily flow, including, but not limited to asphalt, concrete, masonry, wood, gravel and clay, and which consist of elements including, but not limited to, court yards, sports courts,swimming pools,patios, sidewalks,ramps, terraces and driveways. TOTAL MAXIMUM PERMITTED MAX. PERMITTED COVERAGE Zoning EMPERVIOUS LOT AREA BY IMPERVIOUS SURFACES District COVERAGE IN FRONT (sq.fl.) For Base Lot For Lot Area YARD(%) Area(sq.ft.)* Over Base R-25 20 Lot Area(%) R-20 30 0 to 4,000 0 55 R-15 35 4,001 to 6,000 2,200 35 6,001 to 12,000 2,900 27 R 15A 35 12,001 to 16,000 4,520 26 R-12 40 16,001 to 20,000 5,560 25 R-10 45 20,001 to 30,000 6,560 24 30,001 to 40,000 8,960 23 R-7 40 40,001 &larger 11,260 22 R 5 30 R2-F 30 *"Base Lot Area"is the minimum end of the tot size range in the"Lot Area" column Area of tot: 0 5-1 L 1r sq.ft. Existing Allowed Proposed Total impervious coverage 1-1� 5 g.ft. j �J S . % 5 g.ft. Front impervious coverage = 2A ,1 % aj� % I attest to the best of my knowledge and belief,the above information is correct. r -/-- hitect's Signa e (4) ` BUILDING DEPARTMENT VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK 938 K)NG STREET RYE BROOK,NY 10573 (914)939-0668 FAX(914)939-5801 BULK REGULATIONS IN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS Address: Q&-Y- Section- "5¢ Block: Lot: ZZ- MAXIMUM Z.MAXIMUM GROSS FLOOR AREA USE FORMULA: Maximum Gross Floor Area=4,000 f [ (Lot Area—21,780) x 0.11478421 ]: a. Allowed _ �Z.Z?. j' Sq. f=eet b. Existing - 51 z S Sq. Feet c. Proposed 3 Sr i _Sq. Feet HEIGHTISETBACK RATIOS FOR RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS DEFINITION: A standard designed to regulate the height of a building in relation to the average grade of the corresponding portion of the lot line from which it is set back. The ratio modifies the maximum permitted Height of Building by forming an inclined plane beginning at the average grade along the portion of the lot line from which the setback is measured and rising toward the building at the specified ratio above which no part of any building, other than minor architectural features such as chimneys, skylights and dormer windows not covering more than 10%of the entire roof area,shall be permitted to extend. Height and Setback shall be calculated using the formula; Height!Setback=X,where X is the required side or front yard ratio for the zoning district in which a property is located as specified in Article VIII of Chapter 250. A complete elevation view for the proposed improvement must be included on the drawings. FILL IN YOUR RATIOS: ZONE EXISTING PROPOSED REQUIRED FRONT: FRONT: FRONT: .48 R-25 SIDE: SIDE: SIDE: 1.30 FRONT: FRONT: FRONT: .60 /=ZD SIDE: SIDE: SIDE: 1.60 FRONT: ,43 FRONT: Y1- (FRONT: .6SIDE:jA1jG� SIDE:1DE: 1.60 FRONT: FRONT: NT: .80 J7 INA SIDE: SIDE: DE: 2.40 FRONT: FRONT: FRONT: .69 R 12 SIDE: SIDE: SIDE: 1.60 FRONT: FRONT: FRONT: .80 1�=f0 SIDE: SIDE: SIDE: 2.40 FRONT: FRONT: FRONT: .96 I77 SIDE: SIDE: SIDE: 3.00 FRONT: FRONT: FRONT: 1.20 R5 SIDE: SIDE: SIDE: 4.00 FRONT: FRONT: FRONT: 1.20 1=ZF SIDE: SIDE: SIDE: 4.00 1 attest to the best of my knowledge and belief,the above information is correct. /-PO . itect's Signature (5) 2/10/2015 t� JOHN G. SCARLATO JR. ARCHITECT 33 Byram Hill Road Armonk, N.Y. 10504 Phone: (994) 273-7350 Fax: (994) 273-9222 JGSCARLATO@GMAIL.COM March 16,2016 Michal Nowak Village Engineer Village of Rye Brook 938 King Street Rye Brook,NY 10573 Dear Mike: RE: 6 Paddock Road 1 would like to apply for a waiver on the land scape plan since we are not changing the foot print and are keeping the landscaping around the house and yard the same. If you have any questions please give me a call. Thank you for your help. Sincerely, John G. Scarlato Jr. P 111H, gg y cu repe s$ _ i O - ° w O a I m ❑w>: tltl� oil It I N1 11 1 11 CC g y qg �jyPggtliggggzx C bl JaLu m ¢� ZNU' SAI^ 4 - `� �- d'g un " "olixll gill m 11 Olin g � -g � I I � ztt ## pP �gsg m gal Y°Aip� " PSS pM� kiRi d n P a S I�Cf I I\ ill-'-T-42_ 0 3 I � '✓ = r `� I I � Q E -------------- oo � oo s s 6 cw = 6s $ A� F- DO m � o ti u o o � * pp k B t G C C A e 6 n � S n ., A q S a 9 NOW O S g o gl s£ N10) �� zo.-OKE azzW O Z Z00 z0 ' 0E-w w O00 0� w yam as >ro------------- } -------------- -------------- i am ------------ ------------ ------------ ----------- ------------- ------------ ----------- ----------- ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------ Eli III Will NMM 1 0 I gv� v� n s r 1 O z 11] \ �§ § O 1, §3 N 0 6 w cCo _ ? p V W Wpb 0 4 i U .� �z mz [ f/) -C to YZ Z F. z 0 o b E- LL LLI BUY OU Q Z0O� r0W wy. r w Qd Q m D aLU W m Q >J } } > 9 C y� 4 4i tin At 4 LLLLJ g N �I a z 4 0 o 28 4- F� c� o �. L O N O 0- a O ` U A °' WO zN �i U a) ag ❑d'Y ¢0 LL i (n`1Z z� �z o 2 Ez � IrO�z 0 0a Q - O ~J ~ n Z O Q m 4 ry d Q¢ z m o a i m }co} LL O Sgtg �a$ Io- 3 a 9 Z tj w�� P W LO U . Z O $ '' w ❑y 0a Y i 6�e4t iE> N 0w 0C, 0 e z Z r J Q o Q LL Z CO00 �o - 8g � meg' 8 I r Ilk II, � $ pc pppa f� N ;3 . z € T V17o 8 �y $ � 9 a h 1 4 T b P = P � Z 9 4 O F C a F g C O9 O O Y O � L W o y O L—J ffi o O cj ° � (D .. < U O o LO td .U�. g wo - °v o� z'a � 'C) �g LL 92>: �z 0 8 § V, V �� W U Z ZO '0 o �z WOO o4a z� i =4 4ON as �? � oo� 0 }�} s z v <^ _ TF V O ; Q O �o <� a� Q O F Q 2 V NMI IN fill - s R � � L k 0 _p d U0 U) 0 0 i U Z Lu 0 o ~ o U)YZ Zwz � o m L E Y n 'U Y wLD Z z Q Ey Zp0 t=w 0 0 0 0 J U - m 000 as o v }'} it 0 WI � �� �� SFrZ:— ______- II II � II II II � II gall II II � � 4 X611 II II �fi � II n 11 II II II � II � -- I� II iiI VIE� ii +1�, I Rapl II II ll II II II II II � 0 I -- ----- --- - o P C7 O w o r o 00 W0� oN w� g 1 Zoi U w rcg ❑�> 7dz W� w s � U) L w NO. wr w # d ` E} UY z0 LD � �I zoo t=Lij W co w W W _ .. ... s+< o O © 000©*QOI$ i� aOf x V Z ® as U 111 E c so o� N= _J L rr^^ c V O W Z @ r CU L/J = O (0 w�+ m LU w0� am JU o � a A Dpi = W g L 8 gg '1 » L @ Z u�i of o O W O crW J 3 Y 0 O~ LL\ < <- Jam ¢¢ z J : r m } °} wv U) v ZA nEl FU it ZA v fl s � � fl: 0 t tl €€ B ip ala �� L O 0 o ig - U 0 ~ i U Z¢.- O 1 o �a U) L o LL (AYZ z� K< i E> K00 O� �Oa Z p O w p0 ❑t w oam a¢ N w o w I ;7 PA IL LL- nu -��-_ 'IL_— L -— JL-- ir 77 uu ri� � giiu ""`� I4 a � i 14 , g1 F '; J II p II II EIIII II II I, L C� O n Upo z 0 cu � z¢ 0, g 1 o oar zz g U) U �� WU.Z z0. o� o g g L E) Y O zF 2002 F w3 O c O Q a N.y Jam � }�} W l �� Ia 1p yq Y I, v�t,heArl¢) ,>e s $ 1 eareTA axxm ro�l'� a�en q A I I C) o co 0G� N g O O N � °i wOo oy J �.o V.z C) �¢ " g£p Q o www c°) } W FF �1 05 sv 0 j W pR pp V Y F al fLSOI ANN 9�Y ,9R9plAN"�R:N1 P 4H 1'�P© awenYw�%b'S9 30N301S32J N0113J. UBlsaO 6uue9ul6u3 IlAlO F sf $ B ;a o Nt1ld OlIS 'O'd'`JIHclsin'S 2OHdOlSRNHO 3 eon s o� sEY, ��i •E�gE� '� A� „�A Sa 3 s 6k sq9 e5a 6eg•a € =sc .2 sa ' sg egg! §191 a � 6 IM $ 3 m�SVgs.� E BE 8asge I Z 6 "'e'.51 ffi 619�" 0 i A F T�9F kt ____________ \\ \\ I I 1 e H lop Y�€,,I II ®yY I I � � 1 i � j '�-,•: a I I $I 1 til � 6 O e a �� I I I a/I � I I 1 rOC } ` / /suw... II " " " 6 \6 • i • i M t •.mro.wx I I Y �I 1" 10 1 0 pA�YWp VB (VON SOOOM `JNI'JNIM w a■®.®. awe °Ou EMl AN 4�I�Y gp, / 'r:k/a+rGYJ ProY1 pPrel9 '•s 3ON3OIS32!N0113A + rvn✓ Yu' - s S u61SaO 6uuaaul6u3 limo $ B 10 Sll d134 NOIlOfkilSNOO 3 d'OIHOSlfI'S 2i3HdOlSI?!HO s suoiavrn " ate' b ,y : ho al A b ���tl�e� �i�y��� 3`� j•. aF I . -III mill 111141 I! � � aH 9 �b 3a Hill jl S o� i k E h-� �•Fg {�x� � 6, W 69 a d This form must be properly completed & notarized by the Design Professional of record and the Property Owner. Failure to provide this completed form with your permit application will delay the permitting process. Notice of Utilization of Truss Type, Pre-Engineered Wood, or Timber Frame Construction. Tale 19 Part 1264 & 1265 NYCRR To: The Building Inspector of the Village of Rye Brook. From: .3 6tlY1 G Subject Properiv: 19 n D QC r_ gaao SBL: 13 5, 3 4-1-ZZZone: i2-/5— Please take notice that the subject; One or Two Family; ❑ Commercial, ❑ New Structure ❑ Addition to an Existing Structure ❑ Rehabilitation to an Existing Structure to be constructer) or performed at the subject property will utilize; ❑ Truss Type Construction (TT) XPre-EngineeredWood Construction(PW) ❑ Timber Construction(TC) in the following location(s); XFloor Framing, including Girders &Beams (F) ❑ Roof Framing (R) ❑ Floor Framing and Roof Framing (FR) Please note that prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy, the subject dwelling or building utilizing truss type, fare-engineered wood, or timber construction must be posted with a Truss identification Sign, installed in conformance with NYCRR§rz64.for Commercial Buildings, and NYCRR§1265 for One &Two Family Dwellings. Dates- Design Professional L7Lt! [c h Mctr G, cl {e ldi 7 Date Property owner Date Notary Public Building Permit Check List & Zoning Analysis Address: s H L i N C-o i- A VF_ SBL: Zone: 11 - 1 'Z- Use: Z 1 o Const.Type: Other'*' �•2•D.� Submittal Date: Z1 t 6 Revisions Submittal Dates: Applicant: 5:o t-c vti o 1-1 $ Nature of Work: NF w (N -G,Moo•�j7 s w 4^?A;n o ;Lw FEB 2 3 2016 Reviews: ZBA: PB: BP: Other: NEED OK (,� O FEES: Filing: 9 BP: C,O: Legalization: APP.: Date Stampe ,/ Properly Signed: ✓ SBL Verified: ✓ H.O.A.Approval: (►� ( ) Scenic Roads: Steep Slopes: Wetlands: Storm Water Review: Street Opening: ( ) ( =.O.: Long: Short: Tees: t 1 l So. — Z,-C-0,0- I 17�. N/A: ( ) ( LAN:Topo: Si a Protection: S/W Mgmt.: Tree Plan: Other: ( ) (� SURVEY: Dated: Z. 3L 6 Current: ✓ Archival: Sealed: ✓ Unacceptable: ( ) ( ) PLANS:Date Stamped: Sealed: Copies: Incomplete: N/A: Other: ( ( ) License: Workers Comp: Liability: Comp.Waiver: Other: ( ( ) CODE 753#: Dated: N/A: (� O HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC:\I.:Plans: Permit: N/A: Other: ( ) ( ) LOW-VOLTAGE ELECTRICAL: Plans: Permit: N/A: Other: ( ) ( ) FIRE ALARM/SMOKE DETECTORS:Plans: Permit: N/A: Other: (✓j ( ) PLUMBING: Plans: Permit: Nat.Gas: LP Gas: N/A/: Other: ( ) ( ) FIRE SUPPRESSION:Plans: Permit: N/A: Other: ( ) ( ) H.V.A.C.: Plans: Permit: N/A: Other: ( ) ( ) FUEL TANK:Plans: Permit: Fuel Type: Other: ( ) ( ) 2010 NY State ECCC: N/A: Other: (� ( ) Final Survey: Final Topo: RAPE Sign-off Letter: As-Built Plans: Other: (� ( ) BP DENIAL LETTER: C/O DENIAL LETTER: Other: ( ) ( ) Other: (✓�A(� mtg. date:EEEEEapproval, notes: mtg. date: approval: notes: ( PB mtg.date: approval: notes: REQUIRED EXISTING PROPOSED NOTES Area: 1'k.Q k 4 4 - dz - - - Circle: t o•P 10.E 0( Frontage: !o-C .06 Front: Front: 97_ ,5 I�9. - 6 3"� _ o�_ Sides: 15 o JOL Rear: S 6�•3 _ 0� . Main Cov: VZ Lyo �i•3 - C� Accs.Cov: 'o ,y' - OIY- Ft.H/Sb: I)d 3 — `1 Sd.H/Sb: 04 GFA: Tot.Imp: 7,4 ASB Z.o Qj7 Z-7 _3T kv�Tr�NQ� 3�iS Ft. 7 Z t3. - Parking' Height/Stories: notgs: ZSo -6.53 e (g r kTa g -fl'� wee t, �1 S- Z !4? VJ(.,WCr-- - ZEA � i- STUDER DESIGN ASSOCIATES INC. Landscape Architects and Site Planners February 18, 2016 Building Department Village of Rye Brook D SCEE N 938 King Street Rye Brook, NY 10573 FS 18 2016 Re: Applications for Building Permit&Wetlands Permit Site: Solomons Residence, 54 Lincoln Avenue �13 LLAGE OOK CE RYE 6 Project: New Pool UILDING DEPARTMENT To Whom It May Concern: Attached are additional copies of the drawings submitted on February 11'h to complete our application for the replacement of an existing pool and patio, relocation of pool fencing, construction of an open pavilion & pergola with 8'wall backdrop, and a built-in barbecue counter. These applications include(10)copies of following drawings: • Wetlands Map by Ralph G. Mastromonaco, PE, PC dated September 17, 2001 • Erosion and Sediment Control Plan by Fusion Engineering PC dated Feb. 2, 2016 • Landscape Architectural drawings by Studer Design Associates(sheets LA-1 through LA-6)dated February 9, 2016. • Pavilion & Pergola design by John Clements Architect dated Dec. 15, 2015. We hope that the attached items fulfill the requirements for the application process. If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, -John C. De Feo, a-'s' cap rchitect 679 Danbury Road • Ridgefield, Connecticut 06877 phone 203 894 1428 facsimile 203-894-1429 • Providing Design Services since 1990 STUDER DESIGN ASSOCIATES lNc. Landscape Architects and Site Planners WETLANDS & WATERCOURSE PERMIT APPLICATION NARRATIVE DATE: February 10, 2016 ME TO: Planning Board Village of Rye Brook938 King Street Rye Brook, NY 10573 OWNER: Laura & Seth Solomons SITE: 54 Lincoln Avenue (135.49-1-5) Rye Brook, NY SUBJECT: This application is submitted pursuant to the Village of Rye Brook, Wetlands and Watercourses Regulations for a permit to conduct certain regulated activities within one hundred feet (100) of a regulated wetland. The proposed activities include the removal and replacement of an in- ground swimming pool and related equipment, pool patio, pool fence enclosure, pavilion & pergola, and built in barbecue. EXISTING CONDITIONS: The subject property consists of a 3.148 acre residential lot and is accessed off the West side of Lincoln Avenue. The parcel is located within the R-12 residential zone and is surrounded by residential properties. There is a brook (Blind Brook) located within the center of the property dividing the property with the Town of Harrison municipality on the southwest portion of the property. The property is 2.25 acres within the village of Rye Brook. Running parallel on the east side of the brook is a 12' wide Sanitary Sewer Easement labeled "Parcel P-58 — F.M. #1128". The house is set within the Rye Brook portion of the property with a man-made pond between it and Lincoln Avenue. To the south of the house is an existing tennis court with the driveway running along the north side lot line. To the north west of the house is an existing vinyl pool and patio with surrounding chain link fencing. 679 Danbury Road • Ridgefield, Connecticut - 06877 • phone 203-894-1428 • facsimile 203-894-1429 Wetlands have been flagged previously by Tim Miller Associates and surveyed by Ralph G. Mastromonaco, P.E., P.C. on September 17, 2001. The wetland delineation line runs closely to the edge of the brook due to its steep embankment. New topography has been mapped depicting the brook, a bridge crossing the brook and the remains of a masonry dam, by Thomas C. Merritts Land Surveyors, P.C. with a revision date of February 3, 2016. The property is moderately sloping from Northeast to Southwest with landscape grounds between Lincoln Avenue and the house. It continues to slope slightly off the rear of the house with a steep sloping grade immediately adjacent to the brook. Along this embankment are stands of maple and pine with mixed self— seeded shrubs and groundcover. The property then begins a moderate slope to the southwest corner with heavy wooded vegetation between the brook and the property lines. Electric service to the property begins above ground with a connection from a street-side utility pole to a utility pole within the property between the driveway and the northern side property line. Service is directed below ground to the residence from this pole. From the road there is also public water and gas feeds. Sewage is connected to the existing sanitary sewer line crossing the property. PROPOSED ACTIVITY: It is proposed to remove an existing in-ground vinyl pool and its surrounding concrete patio and construct a new concrete in-ground pool with new patio and at-grade decking. Above a portion of the proposed patio is a proposed open pavilion with accompanying pergola with proposed built in masonry barbecue. Existing chain link pool fencing is proposed for removal and new decorative pool fencing is proposed to extend to surround the rear yard near the top of the Blind Brook bank with the house acting as part of the enclosure. Proposed construction is limited so as to not increase development closer to Blind Brook from existing pool and patio limits and with minimum disturbance to adjacent topography with only minor cutting required to enlarge the pool extents. Excess cut soils are proposed to be removed off site. Proposed pool equipment is to be adjacent to the existing location to be removed. Pool patios consist of on grade wood decking and concrete pavers set on porous concrete to allow for direct point penetration. Overall proposed activities would introduce 2,233 SF of constructed elements (pool, patio, pavilion) with 500 SF being outside the 100 foot wetland regulated area. Total impervious coverage' over previous built elements increases 395 SF. Surrounding the proposed pool are existing plantings for screening purposes and replacement of the existing lawn. To enhance the connection to the stream while providing mitigation to areas within the regulated wetland area, it is proposed to plant approximately 1,200 SF along the top of the Blind Brook bank with native vegetation. No trees are proposed to be removed as part of this application and all work is proposed within existing lawn / developed areas. A tree removal permit has been included as part of this application to cover the possibility of damage with the planting of replacements as necessary. Quantity for impervious coverage does not take into account the permeability of the proposed porous on-grade deck. 679 Danbury Road • Ridgefield, Connecticut - 06877 phone 203-894-1428 • facsimile 203-894-1429 Access to the site is proposed directly from the adjacent driveway to the east with typical anti tracking pad and silt fencing with hay bales proposed to contain construction and possible siltation from migrating towards the brook. Total land disturbance during construction will be approximately 7,800 SF (includes access road) MITIGATION: The potential for siltation and contamination of wetland areas during construction will be managed by the installation and maintenance of sedimentation and erosion controls as indicated on drawings by Fusion Engineering, LLP. The design, being less than 400 SF over the existing impervious surface area, along with the fact that the design incorporates porous concrete to allow for water infiltration, negates the need for drainage structures, piping, and relocation of surface waters. This will further decrease disturbance within the wetland regulated area. All disturbed areas are proposed to be restored to full plant coverage to prevent erosion with repair of lawn areas adjacent to the pool and patio. Proposed installation of 1,200 SF of mixed native herbaceous and woody plantings between the pool and the brook will assist in the preservation of the sloped bank, assist in filtration of existing lawn runoff, provide additional food and cover for wildlife, as well as enhance the property aesthetically. In addition, the installation of the fence adjacent to the top of the brook bank will provide a barrier for foot and mechanical traffic (leaf blowers, lawn mowers, etc.). SUMMARY: With careful consideration and planning, the proposed activity will have minimum impact to the surrounding areas and will further enhance the property's relationship with the wetlands. Additional coverage has been moved further from the wetlands and paved areas are designed to allow for direct penetration of stormwater into the soils below. Increased coverage over an existing lawn area will decrease the amount of fertilizers that may be used. Separation of the proposed pool area and the wetlands through the planting of a native shrubs and perennials will further protect the wetlands from any activities and potential disturbance and all proposed grading is minor with all disturbed areas to be replanted. And of course, proposed erosion and sediment control practices will protect the existing wetland and adjacent properties from sediment contamination during the construction of the project. We look forward to a favorable response to this application. Please feel free to contact us should you have any questions regarding this application. Sincerely, l r John C. De Feo, Landscape Architect Senior Associate 679 Danbury Road • Ridgefield, Connecticut • 06877 • phone 203-894-1428 • facsimile 203-894-1429 STUDER DESIGN ASSOCIATES INC. Landscape Architects and Site Planners February 11, 2016 Building Department ITEEP01 Village of Rye Brook 938 King Street Rye Brook, NY 10573 Re: Applications for Building Permit&Wetlands Permit Site: Solomons Residence, 54 Lincoln Avenue Project: New Pool To Whom It May Concern: Attached are documents and plans for the application for permits regarding the replacement of an existing pool and patio, relocation of pool fencing, construction of an open pavilion & pergola with 8' wall backdrop, and a built- in barbecue counter. These applications include(3)copies of drawings for preliminary review with additional drawings as per requirements to follow. Enclosed are the following items: Application for Site Plan Approval o Check for$1,150 (#5104)for wetlands o Check for$2,500 (#5105)for escrow • Exterior Building Permit Application o Check for$75.00 (#5103)for filing fee • Tree Removal Permit Application (due to proximity of construction—no trees proposed for removal) o Check for$50.00 (#5106)for filing fee • Short Environmental Asessment Form—parts 1, 2, &3 • Waiver for full site topographical survey dated February 10, 2016. • Waiver for detailed location of utilities dated February 10, 2016. • Wetlands &Watercourse Permit Application Narrative dated February 10, 2016 • Site Photos with Photo Location Map • Copy of tax assessment card • Copy of sale deed with accompanying survey List and map of neighbors to be notified • (3) copies of Wetlands Map by Ralph G. Mastromonaco, PE, PC dated September 17, 2001 • (3) copies of Erosion and Sediment Control Plan by Fusion Engineering PC dated Feb. 2, 2016 o Cover letter by Fusion Engineering noting added impervious below 400 SF threshold for stormwater management mitigation. • (3) copies Landscape Architectural drawings by Studer Design Associates (sheets LA-1 through LA-6) dated February 9, 2016. • (3) copies of Pavilion & Pergola design by John Clements Architect dated Dec. 15, 2015. • CD containing all drawings noted above. We hope that besides the additional copies of drawings to follow, the attached items fulfill the requirements for initiating the application process. If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, John C. De Feo, Landscape Architect 679 Danbury Road • Ridgefield, Connecticut • 06877 • phone 203-894-1428 • facsimile 203-894-1429 • Providing Design Servn es since 1990 STUDER DESIGN ASSOCIATES INC. Landscape Architects and Site Planners February 10, 2016 D F.C F. � V F. Building Department FEB :1:1:2016: ] D Village of Rye Brook VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK 938 King Street BUILDING DEPARTMENT Rye Brook, NY 10573 Re: Application for Site Plan Approval —Waiver for detailed location of utilities Site: 54 Lincoln Avenue Project: New Pool To Whom It May Concern: As part of our application before the Planning Board, we are requesting a waiver for the provision of a full detailed mapping of the existing utilities (water, gas, electric, sewer) as they are all underground without record of actual locations. We do know and depict the location of the utility pole feeding the electric service to the property and according to past records regarding the sewer easement crossing the property, there is a connection to the sewer via manhole#13 (contract 874, easement parcel P-58, F.M. # 11228). Where the actual lines exist from known points are unknown. Prior to construction, a full assessment of the utilities feeding the property will be requested through Dig Safely, NY. We believe that within the proposed construction site feeding the pool, there are existing natural gas and electric lines which we will be unearthing and utilizing as part of the proposed construction. If you have any questions or comments regarding this waiver, please feel free to contact me. S' John C. De Feo, Landscape Architect 679 Danbury Road • Ridgefield, Connecticut • 06877 • phone 203-894-1428 • facsimile 203-894-1429 • Providing Design Services since 1990 STUDER DESIGN ASSOCIATES INC. ■ ■ ■ Landscape Architects and Site Planners February 10, 2016 EVILLAGE �l/7 Building Department 0; Village of Rye Brook E BROOK938 King Street RTMENT Rye Brook, NY 10573 Re: Application for Site Plan Approval —Waiver for full site topographical survey Site: 54 Lincoln Avenue Project: New Pool To Whom It May Concern: As part of our application before the Planning Board, we are requesting a waiver for the provision of a full topographical survey of the entire property and are providing a survey by Thomas Merritts Land Surveyors, P.C. recently dated February 3, 2016 depicting the topographical area of approximately 40,000 SF whereas our proposed overall disturbance is approximately 2,200 SF. We hope that the board will be in favor of this waiver so that we may not incur the unnecessary expense which I believe unnecessary for a project of this scope. If you have any questions or comments regarding this waiver, please feel free to contact me. Sincerel , ohn C. De Feo, Landscape Architect 679 Danbury Road • Ridgefield, Connecticut • 06877 • phone 203-894-1428 • facsimile 203-894-1429 • Providing Design Services since 1990 STUDER DESIGN ASSOCIATES INC. --- -- -- Landscape Architects and Site Planners March 4, 2016 Building Department REVIPIAN Village of Rye Brook MAR —4 2016 938 King Street DATE Rye Brook, NY 10573 BUILDING DEPARTMENT Re: Applications for Building Permit&Wetlands Permit Site: Solomons Residence, 54 Lincoln Avenue Project: New Pool To Whom It May Concern: Attached is a revised copy of our Permit Application Narrative along with (13) revised sets(sheets LA-1 through LA-6 dated March 3, 2016) of Landscape Architectural drawings based on changes according to suggestions by Michael Izzo and Michal Nowak. These changes include the modification of a proposed 8' ht. wall to now be 6' in height in order to avoid approval by the ZBA. In addition, changes were made in the drawings and narrative reflecting the use of permeable concrete in order to avoid the need for stormwater calculations supporting the use of this material. We hope that these changes will fulfill the requirements for the application process so that we may obtain a favorable review for wetlands and building permit approvals. If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to contact me. �SI�.el , / John C. De Feo, Landscape Architect v 679 Danbury Road • Ridgefield, Connecticut 06877 • phone 203-894-1428 • facsimile 203-8941429 • Providing Design Services since 1990 STUDER DESIGN ASSOCIATES INC. Landscape Architects and Site Planners WETLANDS & WATERCOURSE PERMIT APPLICATION NARRATIVE DATE: March 3, 2016 at TO: Planning Board Village of Rye Brook MAR -4 2016 938 King Street Rye Brook, NY 10573 ILDI G OWNER: Laura & Seth Solomons SITE: 54 Lincoln Avenue (135.49-1-5) Rye Brook, NY SUBJECT: This application is submitted pursuant to the Village of Rye Brook, Wetlands and Watercourses Regulations for a permit to conduct certain regulated activities within one hundred feet (100) of a regulated wetland. The proposed activities include the removal and replacement of an in- ground swimming pool and related equipment, pool patio, pool fence enclosure, pavilion & pergola, and built in barbecue. EXISTING CONDITIONS: The subject property consists of a 3.148 acre residential lot and is accessed off the West side of Lincoln Avenue. The parcel is located within the R-12 residential zone and is surrounded by residential properties. There is a brook (Blind Brook) located within the center of the property dividing the property with the Town of Harrison municipality on the southwest portion of the property. The property is 2.25 acres within the village of Rye Brook. Running parallel on the east side of the brook is a 12' wide Sanitary Sewer Easement labeled "Parcel P-58 - F.M. #1128". The house is set within the Rye Brook portion of the property with a man-made pond between it and Lincoln Avenue. To the south of the house is an existing tennis court with the driveway running along the north side lot line. To the north west of the house is an existing vinyl pool and patio with surrounding chain link fencing. 679 Danbury Road • Ridgefield, Connecticut • 06877 • phone 203-894-1428 • facsimile 203-894-1429 Wetlands have been flagged previously by Tim Miller Associates and surveyed by Ralph G. Mastromonaco, P.E., P.C. on September 17, 2001. The wetland delineation line runs closely to the edge of the brook due to its steep embankment. New topography has been mapped depicting the brook, a bridge crossing the brook and the remains of a masonry dam, by Thomas C. Merritts Land Surveyors, P.C. with a revision date of February 3, 2016. The property is moderately sloping from Northeast to Southwest with landscape grounds between Lincoln Avenue and the house. It continues to slope slightly off the rear of the house with a steep sloping grade immediately adjacent to the brook. Along this embankment are stands of maple and pine with mixed self— seeded shrubs and groundcover. The property then begins a moderate slope to the southwest corner with heavy wooded vegetation between the brook and the property lines. Electric service to the property begins above ground with a connection from a street-side utility pole to a utility pole within the property between the driveway and the northern side property line. Service is directed below ground to the residence from this pole. From the road there is also public water and gas feeds. Sewage is connected to the existing sanitary sewer line crossing the property. PROPOSED ACTIVITY: It is proposed to remove an existing in-ground vinyl pool and its surrounding concrete patio and construct a new concrete in-ground pool with new patio and at-grade decking. Above a portion of the proposed patio is a proposed open pavilion with accompanying pergola with proposed built in masonry barbecue. Existing chain link pool fencing is proposed for removal and new decorative pool fencing is proposed to extend to surround the rear yard near the top of the Blind Brook bank with the house acting as part of the enclosure. Proposed construction is limited so as to not increase development closer to Blind Brook from existing pool and patio limits and with minimum disturbance to adjacent topography with only minor cutting required to enlarge the pool extents. Excess cut soils are proposed to be removed off site. Proposed pool equipment is to be adjacent to the existing location to be removed. Pool patios consist of on grade wood decking and concrete pavers set on porous concrete to allow for direct point penetration. Overall proposed activities would introduce 2,233 SF of constructed elements (pool, patio, pavilion) with 500 SF being outside the 100 foot wetland regulated area. Total impervious coverage over previous built elements increases 395 SF. Surrounding the proposed pool are existing plantings for screening purposes and replacement of the existing lawn. To enhance the connection to the stream while providing mitigation to areas within the regulated wetland area, it is proposed to plant approximately 1,200 SF along the top of the Blind Brook bank with native vegetation. No trees are proposed to be removed as part of this application and all work is proposed within existing lawn / developed areas. A tree removal permit has been included as part of this application to cover the possibility of damage with the planting of replacements as necessary. 679 Danbury Road • Ridgefield, Connecticut • 06877 • phone 203-894-1428 • facsimile 203-894-1429 Access to the site is proposed directly from the adjacent driveway to the east with typical anti tracking pad and silt fencing with hay bales proposed to contain construction and possible siltation from migrating towards the brook. Total land disturbance during construction will be approximately 7,800 SF (includes access road) MITIGATION: The potential for siltation and contamination of wetland areas during construction will be managed by the installation and maintenance of sedimentation and erosion controls as indicated on drawings by Fusion Engineering, LLP. The design, being less than 400 SF over the existing impervious surface area, negates the need for drainage structures, piping, and relocation of surface waters. This will further decrease disturbance within the wetland regulated area. All disturbed areas are proposed to be restored to full plant coverage to prevent erosion with repair of lawn areas adjacent to the pool and patio. Proposed installation of 1,200 SF of mixed native herbaceous and woody plantings between the pool and the brook will assist in the preservation of the sloped bank, assist in filtration of existing lawn runoff, provide additional food and cover for wildlife, as well as enhance the property aesthetically. In addition, the installation of the fence adjacent to the top of the brook bank will provide a barrier for foot and mechanical traffic (leaf blowers, lawn mowers, etc.). SUMMARY: With careful consideration and planning, the proposed activity will have minimum impact to the surrounding areas and will further enhance the property's relationship with the wetlands. Additional coverage has been moved further from the wetlands and paved areas are designed to allow for direct penetration of stormwater into the soils below. Increased coverage over an existing lawn area will decrease the amount of fertilizers that may be used. Separation of the proposed pool area and the wetlands through the planting of a native shrubs and perennials will further protect the wetlands from any activities and potential disturbance and all proposed grading is minor with all disturbed areas to be replanted. And of course, proposed erosion and sediment control practices will protect the existing wetland and adjacent properties from sediment contamination during the construction of the project. We look forward to a favorable response to this application. Please feel free to contact us should you have any questions regarding this application. Sincerely, John C. De Feo, Landscape Architect Senior Associate 679 Danbury Road • Ridgefield, Connecticut • 06877 • plione 203-894-1428 • facsimile 203-894-1429 BUILD 1��r TMENT ECEUVE VILA E OF Ry OK FM 11 2016 938 KING ET RYE BR �o ,NY 10573 (914)9 04 68 F,�X 1 39-5801 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK vt-rye� o rt BUILDING DEPARTMENT ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD CHECK LIST FOR APPLICANTS This form must be completed and signed by the applicant of record and a copy shall be submitted to the Building Department prior to attending the ARB meeting. Applicants failing to submit a copy of this check list will be removed from the ARB agenda. Job Address: cJA' Ll N e'O L'i�j AV C Phone# Lit 3y� �jOO�j Parcel ID#: 13Gi,4")r I -- S Zone: Date of Submission: 2 t O 1 <o Proposed Improvement(Describe in detail): rZFL4qAPPLICANT CHECK LIST: C E I=XIST [9Upr„ i P/stri0, The following items must be submitted to the Building I N 5'ti M,t- NEW 1900l. FEN C—R., Pw1ta O N Department with the application-no exceptions. Me6 * &-.g 0 tLx (N eee� 8 t 1. ( )Completed Application -7 2. ( )Eight(8)sets of sealed plans. (mar. s,_e - 36".02 Property Owner: IAQR-4- 3. ( )Eight(8)copies of the property survey. Address: C�4- L4 ry coLiJ A,-VE t✓ ptie. 4. ( )Eight(8)copies of the proposed site plan. 5. )One electronic disc copy of the complete Phone# �' q �S- d t!S application materials. Applicant appearing before the Board: 6. Filing Fee. ` 7. Any supporting documentation. ,lc>ymj 26F' ar- 5rVO,--v-- hnroe. 8. (gh)HOA approval letter. (if applicable) Address: VA WN F-y (zV,,T4OGcFIeL.0 eff- 9. (,W)Photographs. / Ocol5--t-7 10.( ) Samples of finishes color chart. (a sample boa,•d or• Phone#Czy $9 +- I IV-ZS model may be presented the night of the meeting) Architect/Engineer: F V5,1Df4 C ,N srvr By signature below, the owner/applicant acknowledges that he/she has read the complete Building Permit Instructions&Procedures,and that their application is complete in all respects.The Board of Review reserves the right to refuse to hear any application not meeting the requirements contained herein. Sworn to before me this 2-8 Sway T%=p T"�S Sworn to before me this 2- 1� 13EFC7fZa vine day of , 20 ,0 P,&y 0- r z01 ca day of.' , 20��p (W-Eo Signature of Property Owner t�r��11? p� -tv? ,<.Awligna r o Applicant Lav rn 20// Z Laur o Print Name of Property Owner V-M;,l-N P4V-- Kir Print Name of Applicant Notary Public N 0•ry}-r— Req V Nbtary Public t�IB J:BRADBUR k ERIK M V,E 1 Z tq'f�i Mct State t>��w yob ERIK M VIETZ Notary Public-State of New York ,,�b�'�,R6,,11 985-;, Notary Public-State of New York N0. 01V16252358 tfrt id V��stbhester CouY N0.01VI6252358 Qualified in Westchester County gr6n Expires January 29,20 ` Qualified in Westchester County +. mn ssion Expires Dec 5,2019 My Commission Expires Dec 5,2019 f 2/10/2015 �Qy D �• LG�VLEJ t 19 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK MAYOR 938 King Street, Rye Brook, N.Y. 10573 ADMINISTRATOR Paul S. Rosenberg (914)939-0668 Fax(914) 939-5801 Christopher J Bradbury www.rvebrook.orn TRUSTEES BUILDING&FIRE Susan R. Epstein INSPECTOR David M. Heiser Michael J. Izzo Jason A. Klein Jeffrey B. Rednick NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL Application # 16-009 February 26, 2016 Seth Solomons & Laura Solomons 54 Lincoln Avenue Rye Brook,New York 10573 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that your application for building permit dated February 11, 2016, for the premises located at 54 Lincoln Avenue, Parcel ID# 135.49-1-5, has been disapproved because of non- compliance with the following section(s) of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook: §250-6.B.(1)(g)[31[a] The maximum allowable height for a wall is 6 feet. The applicant proposes to construct an 8 foot high stone wall. Please revise your plans to fully comply with the applicable section(s) of Village Code, or an appeal to this decision may be brought before the Village Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA) in accordance with §250-13 and §250-40 of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook. Applications to appear before the ZBA are available at the Building Department or online at www.ryebrook.org. SiRha Mi Building &Fire Inspector mizzo ,ryebrook.org BUILDING `DEPARTMENT �(`� (� (J VILLA 6-g�suvw- tOOK D E V� E U E 938 KING S'rr�T RYE B NY 1.0573 (914)93*60"668 FAX(914"39-5801 FM ZQ� iMW.rvebrook.orP, VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK BUILDING DEPARTM FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: Approval Date: Permit# :Application # Approval Signature: ; ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD: Disapproved: :Date: BOT Approval Date: Case # :Chairman: PB Approval Date: Case # :Secretary: ZBA Approval Date: Case # Other: Application Fee: 7S Permit Fees: Exterior Building Permit Application Application dated: .Z 10 !O is hereby made to the Building inspector of the Village of Rye Brook,NY,for the issuance of a Permit for the construction of buildings,structures,additions,alterations or for a change in use,as per detailed statement described below. 1. JobAddress: ;+ L.lHCa��J Ati 2. Parcel ID#: Zone: I z- 3. 3. Proposed Improvement(Describe in detail): c E e)C1 Sv FbOt`. £ Fi , -1 p, i N 5t'>kA-t - NEW P�yc� FEAM;&, l0pN `, FC9-6-6( A _ aQiLT- it's BBd. ��h4 tt,.'tac7ts W 4. Property Owner: C—A-tlrz-,A. SOL-GYrcN Address: 7 4- Phone# I g'- q�✓� O S S`6 Cell# `i 14- 'b4-1 410 6 e-mail COYn List All Other Properties Owned in Rye Brook: Applicant: 1AC44N DEFER OF 591J0617— Address: -10 �bt -' 20., tU Ct�o FJC`f O(g4>"7 `7 Phone#�201io�0:3+- 14-2,b Cell# e-mail JDWN64\ Architect: �o �`► C E r�ry Address: 210 VY10JWTA11,C FZIME P1 ETWO, C Q' Ocr�"6-11 Phone# (ZO-01` 7*L 1 S Cell# e-mail JrLCAR-C�C-:f L•CDY" Engineer: P6VL- GeJZTTG - F-US1U1V �fYC�I Z_dt�S?o Address:/ t0� M, giZO00WA'Y, SU ITe- -,71W H-1 1C Puy+INS, ISS Y IOry Phone# Cg 14)356 5003 Cell# e-mail PAv�F\35%Q Pd , 0-0yn General Contractor: Td Address: Phone# Cell# e-mail (1) 242015 5. Occupancy; (I-Fam.,2-Fam.,Commercial.,etc...)Pre-construction: ( Post-construction: 6. Area of lot: Square feet: —_A (o` -iF �uF oFacres: �. Ir7 bc. ( 2..L &L (1u eO1J 7. Dimensions from proosed building or structure to lot lines: front yard: t b3�`frear yard: (�pr- 3'1 right side yard: 1 C17 -L 60 left side yard: 1-72-'-IL ° other: 8. If building is located on a corner lot,which street does it front on: Iq�A 9. Area of proposed building in square feet: Basement: NI/s 15'fl: N/S 2"d fl: htb 3rd fl: N 10. Total Square Footage of the proposed new construction: 11. For additions,total square footage added: Basement: NIA 1"fl:_N�o _2"d fl: w ,s 3rd fl: ht/a 12. Total Square Footage of the proposed renovation to the existing structure: V4/4 13. N.Y.State Construction Classification: N.Y.State Use Classification: 14. Construction Type& Location: ()Typical Western Lumber Frame;()Timber Frame ITC]; ()Wood Truss ITT]; ()Pre-engineered wood IPW]; Located;()Floor Framing IF];()Roof Framing IR];() Floor&Roof Framing IFR]; Other: �3'1'��c. �DSq' 4 St,4m . wcQp FCCFFfz-A�h`�ty� �Ault�b�1� 15. Number of stories: j Overall Height: U r- 'Z rt Median Height: 11 �• Zr 16. Basement to be full,or partial: ter a finished or unfinished: ^I 17. What material is the exterior finish: StE�� cooro 18. Roof style;peaked,hip,mansard,shed,etc: T'CP'r Roofing material: 445F" - 19. What system of heating: N ��► 20. If private sewage disposal is necessary,approval by the Westchester County Health Department must be submitted with this application. 21. Will the proposed project require the installation of a new,or an extension/modification to an existing automatic fire suppression system?(Fire Sprinkler,ANSL System,FM-200 System,Type I Hood,etc...)Ves:—No: 7�-, (ifyes,applicant Haut submit a separate Automatic Fire Suppression System Permit application&2 sets of detailed engineered plans) 22. Will the proposed project disturb 400 sq.ft.or more of land,or create 400 sq.ft.or more of impervious coverage requiring a Stormwater Management Control Permit as per§217 of Village Code? Yes:_No: Area: 23. Will the proposed project require a Site Plan Review by the Village Planning Board as per§209 of Village Code? Yes: No:__',X (ifyes,applicant Hurst submit a Site Plan Application,&provide detailed drawings) 24. Will the proposed project require a Steep Slopes Permit as per§213 of Village Code Yes: No: (ifyes,you must submit a Site Plan Application,&provide a detailed topographical survey) 25. Is the lot located within 100 ft.of a Wetland as per§245 of Village Code? Yes: )�_No: (ifyes,the area of wetland and the wetland buffer zone must be properly depicted on the survey&site plan) 26. Is the lot or any portion thereof located in a Flood Plane as per the FIRM Map dated 9/28/07? Yes : No: (ifyes,the area and elevations of the flood plane must be properly depicted on the survey&site plan) 27. Will the proposed project require a Tree Removal Permit as per§235 of Village Code?Yes: _:�S_No: (ifyes,applicant must submit a Tree Removal Permit Application) 28. Does the proposed project involve a Home-Occupation as per§250-38 of Village Code? Yes: No: C Indicate: TIER 1: TIER II: TIER III: (ifyes,a Home Occupation Permit Application is required) 29. What is the total estimated cost of construction: $ 1 c O, 000 Note:estimated cost shall include all site improvements,labor,material,scaffolding,fired equipment,professional fees,including any material and labor which may be donated gratis.If the final cost exceeds the estimated cost,an additional fee will be required prior to issuance of the C O. 30. Estimated date of completion: O G r Og U 2 L-0 l(p (2) 2A 2015 BUILDING DEPARTMENT VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK 938 KING STREET RYE BROOK,NY 10573 (914)939-0668 FAX(914)939-5801 RESIDENTIAL LOT AREA COVERAGE Address: ' d l.-W O-o 4 ,Wr- Section: Block: 1 Lot: 5 PERMITTED COVERAGE RATIOS IN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS (Local Law 3-88) YOUR ZONE T AREA IN MAIN ACCESS. DECK ZONE DISTRICT SQ. FEET BLDG. BLDG. MAX. CHECK MAX. R-25 25,000 14% 3.5% 4% R-20 20,000 14% 3.5% 4% R-15 15,000 16% 3.5% 4% R-1 5A 15,000 12% 3.5% 4% R-12 12,500 17% 4% 40-/-1 R-10 10,000 20% 4.5% 3.5% R-7 7,500 23% 4.5% 3.5% R-5 5,000 30% 5% 3.5% R-2F 5,000 30% 5% 3.5% Existing: Proposed: 1. AREA OF LOT O + Sq. Ft. (o Sq. Ft. 2. AREA OF HOUSE a. Coverage of Main Building (Including Attached Garage or Accessory Building) "2 (02 Sq. Ft. 4`2- (o L Sq. Ft. b. Area of 151 Floor Divided By Area of Lot x 100 . ?J % Gi-. 1j oda ✓ 3. AREA OF ACCESSORY BUILDING (Includes Detached Garages,Tool Shed, Playhouses) Sq. Ft. S Sq. Ft. a. Coverage of Accessory Building G, Area of Accessory Building Divided By Area of Lot x 100 -% , ./ % 4. AREA OF DECK S Sq. Ft. S121 Sq. Ft. a. Coverage of Deck Area of Deck Divided By Area of Lot x 100 eD % % `Z I attest to the best of my knowledge and belief, the above information is correct. 2 ----ect's Signature (3) 2 102015 BUILDING DEPARTMENT VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK 938 KING STREET RYE BROOK,NY 10573 (914) 939-0668 Fax(914) 939-5801 IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE RATIOS RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS Address: `A- UNtyt4J l",tf- Section: 13S 4 1-1) Block: 1 Lot: Zone: !P----1 Z IMPERVIOUS SURFACES (Definition): All buildings, as defined herein, and all areas on the ground or elevated above the ground which are comprised of materials through which water cannot readily flow, including, but not limited to asphalt, concrete, masonry, wood, gravel and clay, and which consist of elements including, but not limited to, court yards, sports courts, swimming pools, patios, sidewalks,ramps, terraces and driveways. TOTAL MAXIMUM PERMITTED MAX. PERMITTED COVERAGE Zoning IMPERVIOUS LOT AREA BY IMPERVIOUS SURFACES District COVERAGE INFRONT (sq.ft.) For Base Lot For Lot Area YARD(%) Area (sq.ft.)* Over Base R-25 20 Lot Area(°o) R-20 30 0 to 4,000 0 55 R-15 35 4,001 to 6,000 2,200 35 6,001 to 12,000 2,900 27 R-15A 35 12,001 to 16,000 4,520 26 R-12 40 16,001 to 20,000 5,560 25 R-10 45 20,001 to 30,000 6,560 24 30,001 to 40,000 8,960 23 R-7 40 40,001 & larger 11,260 -2 R-5 30 R2-F 30 *"Base Lot Area" is the minimum end of the lot size range in the"Lot Area" column Area of lot: 4' (O 4 sq.ft. Existing Allowed Proposed Total impervious coverage = '2-0,?,''-7b S .ft. Z$, OSS S . ft. Z-j 2.'715 S .ft. Front impervious coverage = 'Z-1,� � I % 40 % % I attest to the best of my knowledge and belief, the above information is correct. � (���- Zzi c ct's Signature (4) 2 102015 This application must be properly completed in its entirety by a N.Y. State Registered Architect or N.Y. State Licensed Professional Engineer & signed by those professionals where indicated. It must also include the notarized signature(s) of the legal owner(s) of the subject property, and the applicant of record in the spaces provided. Any application not properly completed in its entirety and/or not properly signed shall be deemed null and void, and will be returned to the applicant. Please note that application fees are non-refundable. ********************************************************************************************************** STATE OF NEW YORK,COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER ) as: .-�1titJ I,-)C FES , being duly sworn, deposes and states that he/she is the applicant above named, (print name of individual signing as the applicant) and further states that (s)he is the legal owner of the property to which this application pertains, or that (s)he is the APPU .Uw- /t✓(}�bsc1W'6 AC---e�-rEc�- for the legal owner and is duly authorized to make and file this application. (indicate architect,contractor,agent,attorney,etc.) That all statements contained herein are true to the best of his her knowledge and belief, and that any work performed, or use conducted at the above captioned property will be in conformance with the details as set forth and contained in this application and in any accompanying approved plans and specifications, as well as in accordance with the New York State Uniform Fire Prevention& Building Code, the Code of the Village of Rye Brook and all other applicable laws, ordinances and regulations. � —.tOr.-t Qr Sworn to before me this 2 C� 6,e M I S \of before me this -� t- ,Gbf� day of , 20 �o j a " *1 day 0M , 20J Q Signature of Property Owner l& 1, &Tu2.- Gf Signature of Applicant / Cu I'D S 0)D �a peo L " 10 Print Name of Property Owner k-rL," w Av-n= =5% _Print Name of Applicant; Notary Public rvo i-moo e-- Y Notary Public CHRISTOPHER J. BRADBURY ERIK M VIETZ otary Public, State of New York ERIK M VIETZ \ Notary Public- State of New York No. 01 3RS159985 Notary/Public- State of New York N0. 01VI6252358 ualified in l't/astchester County N0. 01VI6252358 Qualified in Westchester County Co fission Expires January `p Qualified in Westchester County My Commission Expires Dec 5, 2019 29,20\ My Commission Expires Dec 5, 2019 (6) 2.10.15 BUILDI TMENT !S C E O VE VIL E OF RYE OK 938 KING ET RYE BR I NY 10573 FM 11 2016 (914)939 68f (91 939-5801 i VILLAGE r ek orAGE OF RYE BROOK BUILDING DEPARTMENT *********************************************************************************************************** FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: BOT Approval Date: PB Approval Date: BOT Disapproval Date: PB Disapproval Date: Attach Resolution Hereto: BOT[ ] PB[ ] ZBA[ ] Chairman: SITE PLAN FEE: DATE PAID: 2. 1 l c ENVIRONMENTAL FEE: DATE PAID: Z 1 1 C� OTHER: *********************************************************************************************************** APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL Submission of this application does not assure placement on any Planning Board Agenda.The Applicant will be notified of such placement. *********************************************************************************************************** This application references but is not limited to the following sections of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook; §250 ZONING,§209 SITE PLAN REVIEW, §235 TREES, §107 DEMOLITION OF BUILDINGS, §224 SWIMMING POOLS, §121 EXCAVATION &TOPSOIL REMOVAL, §118 EROSION&SEDIMENT CONTROL,§213 STEEP SLOPES PROTECTION,§219 SUBDIVISION OF LAND, §250-40 NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS.Applicants and their Design Professionals are strongly advised to review the above mentioned code sections online at,www.ryebrook.org prior to completing and/or submitting this application. APPLICATION FEE SCHEDULE: Residential Dwellings- $325,plus$200 per additional dwelling unit. Non-Residential Buildings - $475 plus $30 per parking space. Planned Unit Development-$575 per acre PUD Amendment- $300 Site Plan Amendment- $575 Wetlands&Watercourse- $1,150 Consultant Review(Escrow)Fee: Minimum fee$250-maximum fee$2,500,to be determined by the Village Engineer. Application fees are iron-reftntdable. The applicant's Escrox,Accottttt must!tare a positive balance at all times prior to am C'onsttltant.Atior iter,or 1'illage revieiv. Escroir Fees and Site Plan Fees must be paid on separate checks made papable to the Pillage of Rre Brook 1. Site Address: ei 4 L.Ir�r dO,..N Avg Parcel ID#: Zone: [z - 17- 2. Z2. Property Owner: %_�v 2p 5 S tT 1-i S O L-u rn o ty Address:-C,,+ Ll N CLL -N b V c E-Mail: 1-6V e..a50LDr n( )yll400•Cc)ryI Tel.#: Other: 3. Applicant: C4W W_- r-6, OF 'S-Tvp61z _DE 5gcs l Address: (079 pAfSgQah' V-D.,izjc*K-►ELD, CY-CwS-T7E-Mail• JOHN �SyUpE Scc�tspSsoc�P s-e�h Tel.#:12J3) 1 q 2 Q�, Other: 4. Design Professional: Address: E-Mail: Tel.#: Other: 5. Designate to whom correspondence is to be sent: ,rsPPe�cdr�s— Note: If applicant is a"Contract Vendee',please attach a copy of the contract summary with financial and confidential tenns deleted REVISED 8110115 6. Street which property abuts: (,_ I nt C_a t_,(v � V E 7. Does property connect directly into State or County highway? K)NO ( )YES: 8. Is site within 500 feet of Village Boundary? ( )NO b6 YES If yes note all bordering municipalities: H-a-rz-Iz_t s ©" 9. Total area of site: 13�,I' a 3f 54' tyle _ Area of site activity: 'ZOO ekcc. 10. Site coverage: 'L `7 %; Building coverage: 4-, % 11. Existing building size: ;24o t ST New/additional building size: 'Z(o 1 Sr' 12. Existing parking spaces: 7- '* New parking spaces: 1,. 13. Nature of proposed activity: &E FL'&c.0 �Xt�7' Pob� `� PATi c�� 1 `�rf3u . NFX� �bF�l, rri^TIUv, Y2sVILlcm�, PG—l�Gous 8lT1lT IM E$Gi , $�1-+-r- yonuL ****************************************************************************************** Please note that this application must include the notarized signature(s) of the legal owner(s) of the above-mentioned property, in the space provided below. Any application not bearing the legal property owner's notarized signature(s)shall be deemed null and void, and will be returned to the applicant. *********************************************************************************************************** STATE OF NEW YORK,COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER ) as: _�L Irtnl 'D �Ea ,being duly sworn,deposes and states that he she is the applicant above named, (print name of individual signing as the applicant) and further states that (s)he is the leizal owner of the property to which this application pertains, or that (s)he is the for the legal owner and is duly authorized to make and file this application. (indicate architect,contractor,agent,attorney,etc.) That all statements contained herein are true to the best of his her knowledge and belief, and that any work performed, or use conducted at the above captioned property will be in conformance with the details as set forth and contained in this application and in any accompanying approved plans and specifications,as well as in accordance with the New York State Uniform Fire Prevention &Building Code,the Code of the Village of Rye Brook and all other applicable laws,ordinances and regulations. Sworn to before me this _ Swcrn tc brFv-e Me `k i S orn to before me this day of , 20ay �� day o 20 r , Nota P bli Notary ublic SiProperty Owner l ,, �(1 Pn-0_- Sig ature ofApplic nt Lia-t Print Name of Property Owner 1pr•riti-t Natme -A- APPiu-mt Print Name /Applan CHRISTOPHER J.BRADBURY ERIK M VIEW Notary Public,State of New York ERIK M VIETZ [N:otaryblic-State of New York No.01BR6159965 Zotublic-State of New York . O1VI6252358 (qualified in Westchester County0. O1VI6252358 in Westchester County mmission Expires January 29,20 in Westchester Countysion Expires Dec 5, 2019 ssion Expires Dec 5,2019 REVISED 8110115 �yE VILL O Y OOK 938 Kin=S, t,Rye Broo3V.Y. 10573 (914)939-6753 Fax(914)939-5801 �+wW.ryok cert SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REVIEW CHECKLIST This form shall serve as a checklist for site plan submittal and review by the Village of Rye Brook. The use of this plan review checklist by the applicant is to ensure compliance with the technical provisions of§209 of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook entitled, Site Plan Review, pertaining to preliminary and final plan preparation. The Village Code is available on the Village Website at: www.ryebrook.org_ Prior to the appearance before ANY meeting or hearing of the Planning Board, the applicant must comply with all Notification Requirements of Code Section 250-40. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL SHALL INCLUDE: 1. APPLICATIONS. Completed and signed including correspondences. 2. CHECKLIST. Completed and signed. 3. PLANS. Signed, Sealed& Dated. Fifteen paper(15) copies or twenty (20)copies when Board of Trustees approval is required and one (1) electronic version. One (1) record set with original signatures, dates and seals may be provided and submitted with fourteen (14) copies or nineteen (19) copies that clearly indicate the signatures, dates, and seals shown on the record set. 4. FEES: All application fees and Environmental fee. A separate check for filing fee and Environmental fee. 5. Environmental Assessment Form. Form available on the NYS DEC website. 6. Electronic Copy. Complete copy of all plans and shall be submitted electronically at time of submission. 7. jNoitaArizedidavit of i P &Mail Notification. (Applicant's Signature) have read the Notification Requirements 250-40 and will provide notification as required. IDENTIFICATION OF APPLICANT(S): Identification of Applicant: J O E.o e- t—J!�s t--� s cA V'i, 25rze.a-4+-r-eCv4-- Applicant: of Sr-wo2 _ f- ssad r-TS 5 Address: C9 -7",> ��*�� ' V-O, 'F1GLA, 0--Q— 0(o�`�`y Tel. #:(?-� 4- 1 Fax:(203) 89 -1 JZ` L E-Mail:�CHN�STu^ OeStdN.�SscctinrEs.«t71 Project Name: Project Address: 4- L.t N Co LW 4--q e Current Property Owner: Lo,36Z,4 5 ScTL-F Sa Address: rJ` N C-Clk--z-1 6M < Tel. #: 91+- 1'3-3 - O 1;;9 S Fax: E-Mail: -/(}0Q0. LAZ� IDENTIFICATION OF PROPERTY: Identifying Title: Sow Yl)e74-4 S Tax Designation: Section: 1-2j1� Block: Lot: S Zoning District:PL Street which property abuts: V 1 N Plan Submission Date: Site Plan Checklist Page 1 of 7 Project Address y`} Lj N co tN bvG Y N NA PLAN REQUIREMENTS O O 15 -20 copies of plans prepared and signed by a registered Land Surveyor,Engineer or Architect. O O One(1)electronic copy of all submitted plans. 0 O O Topographic Survey stamped by New York State Land Surveyor with license number and seal. t T'Oc-b�) O O Topographic survey scale of one(1) inch per twenty(20)feet or larger. fd O O Section, block and lot numbers of the property taken from the latest tax records along with a copy of the most recent property card on file with the Town of Rye Tax Assessor's office. O O lid Name of the proposed subdivision plan. /S 00 Name and address of the owner of record. O O Name and address of the applicant. '00 O Deed reference(s). O O Names, addresses and signature of every Engineer, Architect, Land Surveyor or Soil Scientist whose professional seal appears on any site plan submitted to the Board. O O North arrow and scale. O O Location map at the minimum scale of 1"equals 1,000 feet. O O Area of all lots,in square feet. �0 O O Engineering notes on plans as stated in application packages. O O Copies of all existing and proposed deed restrictions or covenants applying to the property, including, but not limited to, covenants and agreements restricting the use and establishing future ownership and maintenance responsibilities for all private roads,recreation,and open space areas. O fi� O Any prior land use approvals with respect to the subject property. O O Date the plans were first drafted. Any revision(s)made to any of the sheets first submitted are to be so noted in the revision block. The revision block is to be placed on the originals of the revised sheets. Additional paper copies are to be made& submitted for the Planning Board&Building Dept.to replace those sheets previously submitted. 000 Other existing site improvements,including,but not limited to,fences, landscape or retaining walls,landscaping & screening. 000 Location of all buildings and structures on the premises and approximate location of all neighboring buildings or structures within 100 feet of the lot line. O O Fees paid to The Village of Rye Brook Building Department. )Jr'O O Any revisions to plans shall be identified with a revision cloud and numbered revision triangle Y N NA ABUTTING PROPERTYINFORMATION # 00 The names and addresses of all abutting property owners within 250 ft as indicated in the Municipal records. O O A Zoning and use of abutting properties noted on plans. 0 O O Shape,size,height and location of existing buildings and driveways within one hundred(100)feet of the site. ,B O O Location and description of existing easements within one hundred(100)feet of the site. O O g Location of existing private or public trails within one hundred(100)feet of the site. JB O O Location of existing roads, scenic roads and/or driveways within two hundred(200)feet of the site. O O S' Location of proposed parkland.If none state nearest recreation facility O O Rf Location of existing septic system leach fields within two hundred(200)feet of the site. O O Locations,dimensions,grades and flow direction of existing sewers, culverts,waterlines as well as other underground utilities within and adjacent to the property. Site Plan Checklist Page 2 of Project Address L7 Y y Ne-� v -000 The location of all existing watercourses, intermittent streams,wetland areas and springs,consistent with the definitions set forth in Chapter 245,Wetlands and Watercourses,of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook. Y N NA PROPOSED SITE PLAN INFORMATION �O O O Sufficient, acceptable information to readily determine the location, bearing, and length of every street line, lot line, and property boundary line. ,600 Location of all building setback lines. O W O Topographic data at a minimum contour interval of 2'-0"increments,showing existing and proposed contours on the wkIVC a" property Yand extending a minimum of 25 feet into all adjacent properties. 4Z--TZ:) )1 O O The location and characteristics of the different areas of vegetation, including the identification of all individual trees 12 or more inches in diameter at breast height("DBH"), protected trees of any size, as well as stands of trees and wooded areas, within areas of proposed disturbance, consistent with the provisions of Chapter 235, Trees, of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook. /000 Location and proposed development of all buffer areas, including existing vegetative cover. Xf O d Location and description of any zoning district and municipal boundaries including a zoning compliance chart for the existing and proposed lots. 000 Shape,size,height and location of all existing and proposed buildings. .4100 Location and description of any existing and proposed easements. 00 kf Location and dimensions of all existing and proposed streets,driveways,sidewalks,parking spaces,bicycle parking, loading areas and other facilities associated with the proposed use. O O ,d Identification of the location and amount of building area proposed for retail sales or similar commercial activity. O O Location of existing and proposed utilities(water,sewer,gas,electrical,telephone,oil tank etc.). O O O Design and location of all existing and proposed wells, septic tanks and leach field systems,or methods of waste water disposal. O O Location,type and size of all existing and proposed landscaping and screening including fences and walls. O O %# Location, size and proposed screening of outdoor storage areas, if any. O O Location, design and construction material of all existing or proposed site improvements, including drains, culverts, retaining walls,landscape walls and fences. I� O O Exterior lighting plan and proposed signs to be located on site,including sign orientation,size,height,and elevation view. O 00 Storm drainage plan and plans for snow removal and storage. O 096 Pedestrian and automobile circulation plan. SPS 00 Construction drawings for pavements,walks, steps, curbing,drainage&other structures associated with the proposed use. 00 Erosion and sedimentation control plan,including installation details of proposed control measures,directive construction notations and a schedule for the installation and maintenance of proposed control measure. AK 00 Description of measures planned to assure proper erosion and sedimentation control in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 118 entitled"Erosion and Sediment Control,"of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook. O 0 ,6 Drawing and computation for storm water detention design for a 25-year storm in accordance with the Westchester County Best Management Practices 00 Rock outcroppings and areas of steep slope consistent with the definitions set forth in Chapter 213,Steep Slope Protection, of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook. O 0,0 Location of any common lands and/or public lands. Af O O Phasing or an estimated project construction schedule. R"O O Supporting documents,including deeds, maintenance,condominium agreements,etc. Site Plan Checklist Page 3 of 7 Project Address-A- L4 eyep1 R,( 1400 Location of proposed construction or area of disturbance and its relationship to any property line, easement, building, structure, road, wall, fence, sewage disposal system, well, wetland feature or tree exceeding six inches in diameter measured at a height of four feet from the ground O O Estimate of earthwork showing the quantity of any material to be imported to and/or removed from the site including a chart with the number species and size of any trees to be removed. 0910 Location and size of areas of soils by soil types in the area of proposed disturbance and to a distance of 100 feet surrounding the area of disturbance. 00 )4 Cross sections of steep slope areas. O O Retaining walls or like constructions,with details of construction. O O Approximate boundaries of any areas subject to flooding or stormwater overflows, including areas of special flood hazard and coastal high-hazard areas, consistent with the definitions set forth in Chapter 130, Flood Damage Prevention, of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook. Approximate Wetlands and wetland buffer boundaries shall be clearly delineated. 00 10 Location of fire and other emergency zones, including the location of fire hydrants. .000 Studies to include,but not necessarily limited to: environmental impact analysis,wildlife, traffic, stormwater WA'tVK4?- management,recreation,public service,fiscal impact,visual impact and historic significance documentation, or a written request to waive the submission requirements for these studies. d O O Amount of any bonds required. 0 O O Amount of excavated material to be removed from site, if any. Y N NA OTHER (as applicable) O O 6 Record of application for and approval status of all necessary permits from state and county officials and local utility companies. O O f� Identification of any federal,state or county permits required for the project's execution,including project referrals, if any,&environmental review procedures mandated by Article 8,Environmental Quality Review,of the Environmental Conservation Law(SEQRA). 00 O Any other information felt necessary by the Planning Board to allow the Board to proceed with consideration &to make an informed decision. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CHECKLIST WESTCHESTER COUNTYPLANNING BOARD Notice to Applicants/Developers: At some point during the development review process your project may be referred to the Westchester County Planning Board for review and comment in accordance with state and county laws that require local planning boards, zoning boards of appeals and governing bodies to refer certain development applications to the County Planning Board. Referral to the County Planning Board may not occur until your project has progressed well along through the design process. Since the Planning Board's comments may impact project design, this checklist is provided to encourage early consideration of these areas of concern by applicants to avoid project changes later. For information on the County Planning Board review process and to access an electronic copy of this checklist, go online to www.westcliestergov.com planningreferrals or contact Lukas Herbert at lah5@westchestergov.com. I. COUNTY PLANNING BOARD POLICIES: Written policies underlie all recommendations of the County Planning Board. Westchester 2025-Context for County and Municipal Planning and Policies to Guide County Planning,adopted by the County Planning Board on 5 6 08,amended 1 5 10,can be found at ww.westchestergov.com/2025. Westchester 2025: Policies should be reviewed to determine how they relate to the development proposal. II. IMPACTS TO COUNTY FACILITIES AND SERVICES: The County Planning Board coordinates the review of development projects with Westchester County departments to identify and address potential impacts on County services and infrastructure. In some situations,permits and approvals may be required that could change project design. Site Plan Checklist Page 4 of 7 Project Address 4+ 1.1NJGcA_sQ /J.<— ❑ Map of County Facilities: Review the State & County Roads and Parks map (which also includes county channel lines) to identify proximity to County facilities at: www.westchestergov.com planningdocs pdfinaps countystateroadsparks.pdf. Other useful map links for information about environmental features, septic sewer map, county sewer districts map, etc can be found at. www.westchestergov.com maps ❑ COUNTY ROAD: Applications for development on sites that abut a County road must be submitted for review by the County Department of Public Works. Information and forms can be found at: www.westchestergov.com dpw/bldgperm.htm. Former County Roads do not need review by the Department of Public Works,but will still likely trigger a review by the County Planning Board. ❑ COUNTY CHANNEL LINES: Applications for development on sites within 100 feet of a designated County Channel Line require a stream control permit from the County Department of Public Works. Information and forms can be found at: www.westchestergov.com dpw/bidgperm.htm ❑ COUNTY PARK: New construction & land alteration projects adjacent to County parks are expected to address screening& buffer of new uses from the park, as appropriate. Stormwater should not drain from a developed site onto a County park without acceptable quantity and quality controls. County parks are designated as Critical Environmental Areas. ❑ SEWAGE TREATMENT AT COUNTY TREATMENT PLANT: Local municipalities are required to reduce and eliminate inflow and infiltration (I&I)into the sanitary sewage systems tributary to County treatment plants.New development will be expected to reduce I&I in relation to generation of new flow at a ratio of three to one. This requirement must be discussed with local officials. ❑BEE-LINE BUS SERVICE: Bee-Line bus stops serving a development site should be identified on plans or noted if located off-site. If a bus stop is located along the site's frontage, the applicant should contact the County Department of Transportation to discuss impacts and the need for improvements. Safe and separate pedestrian access should be provided to link a bus stop and sidewalk with building entrances. Information on County bus service and design guidelines can be found at. westchestergov.com transportation images Busoo20Serviceoo20Guidelines.pdf ❑FAIR AND AFFORDABLE HOUSING: Many municipalities require inclusion of fair & affordable units in new developments. Financial assistance to achieve fair & affordable housing development is available through Westchester County & other sources. Applications that include new residential units to be affirmatively marketed & sold or rented subject to fair & affordable housing provisions should be tied to Westchester County guidelines on affordability including income guidelines of eligible households that can be found at: http:/homes.westchestergov.com . If County funding is sought to develop fair & affordable housing,the County Board of Legislators must be included as an involved agency under SEQR. ❑RECYCLING: New buildings must contain a designated area of sufficient size for separation and storage of recyclables and trash. Building expansions should also include sufficient space for separation and storage of recyclables. For more information about County recycling requirements go to: www.westchestergov.com environment recycling.htm ❑STORM SEWER SYSTEM: Any connections to a County storm sewer line will require a permit from the Department of Public Works in accordance with the County Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination (IDDE) law. Information & forms can be found at: www.westcliestergov.com,dpw.bldgperm.htm Non-stormwater discharges to the County storm sewer system are prohibited. III.DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS The County Planning Board's land use policies focus attention on several aspects of development that may have intermunicipal and quality of life impacts.The list below includes areas most frequently commented on by the County Planning Board. ❑N3'ATER: All development plans should include sufficient provisions for stormwater management, water quality measures and mitigation of flooding. ❑Plans should identify the major drainage basin or watershed the site is located in (Croton River, Upper Hudson River, Lower Hudson, Upper Long Island Sound, Bronx River and Lower Long Island Sound). An interactive map with watershed boundaries can be found at www.westcliestergov.com planning/maps&lists/drainbasinsl lxl7.htm1 ❑Watershed plans have been developed for several of the County's watersheds - the Croton, Indian Brook-Croton Gorge, Bronx River & Long Island Sound watersheds - that include specific recommendations that apply to development projects. See recommendations in watershed plans at: planning.westchestergov.com/index.php?option coin content&task view&id 1231& Itemid 2204 Site Plan Checklist Page 5 of 7 Project Address 1=74 u ry c a N Q1f` ❑Development that involves filling, creation of impervious surfaces or buildings and substantive loss of natural vegetation in a floodplain or flood prone area should be avoided. ❑Above ground, vegetated retention detention basins or devices are preferred because they perform better, are easier to inspect and maintain and provide additional environmental benefits over subsurface structural devices. Any such treatments should not be constructed within wetlands or buffer areas around wetlands. ❑The development should treat and retain as much stormwater on-site as possible,particularly when the site is located in a drainage basin with known flooding problems. A Construction Stormwater Toolbox with tools and sources of technical information related to the construction activities and stormwater management best practices is available from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation at: www.dec.ny.gov chemical 8694.html ❑New development should include protection of aquatic resources. For more information about protection of aquatic resourc-es & buffer areas,go to: planning.westchestergov.com index.php?option com content&task—view&id 1491&Itemid 2458 El Impervious cover should be minimized. Permeable paving surfaces should be used where feasible. Vegetative rain gardens should be used, particularly in areas of overland or channelized stormwater flow, to improve stormwater quality and reduce runoff volume. For more information,go to: www.westchestergov.com stormwater ❑Buildings along coastlines and low lying area should consider the impacts of sea level rise. Specific consideration is required of potential impacts to surface and subsurface drinking water supplies. ❑ SITE LAYOUT. Aesthetic design,building orientation and community character should be considered in the site layout and building appearance. ❑In most locations,buildings should face the street and have pedestrian access from the street. ❑Commercial buildings should be located near the front street line with the majority of parking located in the rear of the building. Even gas stations and convenience stores should be upfront in a landscaped setting with parking,pumps and canopy toward the rear. ❑Buildings should be of pedestrian-scale when seen from the sidewalk. ❑Building facades should contribute to and enhance the character of the community. ❑Driveway and pathway connections should be provided to adjacent sites when possible and crosseasements provided. ❑ STREETS. Street design should reduce unwarranted paving and promote connectivity. ❑New streets should connect with adjacent streets wherever feasible to prevent the proliferation of dead-end streets and promote neighborhood integration. ❑Connections could be vehicular or pedestrian/bicycle only,where appropriate. ❑Street widths should be minimized for streets with low traffic volume to reduce speeds and impervious surfaces. Lane widths of 12 feet are only appropriate for major roadways. ❑Driveway widths should be no more than 9 feet to reduce impervious surfaces. ❑Permeable paving surfaces should be used where feasible. ❑ GREEN TECHNOLOGY.New development should include as many green building elements as possible, such as: renewable building materials, energy efficient heating/cooling systems and fixtures,water saving devices,green roofs and permeable paving surfaces. Information can be obtained from the U.S. Green Building Council at: www.usgbc.org. ❑ LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING.The site improvements should enhance community character. Site Plan Checklist Page 6 of 7 Project Address y 4 L j N c.0-t_" sive ❑ Landscaping should consist of native plant species appropriate for the location.Invasive plant species should be prohibited. Invasive plant information available at:www.westchestergov.com planning/environmental;Reports InvasivePlantsBroch08.pdf ❑ Pollutant tolerant plantings should effectively shield parking,loading areas and refuse collection sites. ❑ Site lighting should be provided at the lowest safe levels and lowest heights,avoiding all spillage off site. ❑ PEDESTRIANS. Safe,convenient and ADA accessible pedestrian access is provided. ❑ A sidewalk should be provided along the site frontage along each street. ❑ Direct pedestrian connections should be made from the front of the building to the sidewalk.Pedestrian crossings of drive-ways& parking lots should be minimized or avoided. If they must be provided,painted crosswalks should be provided through parking lots. ❑ ADA accessibility must be provided. ❑ BICYCLISTS.Provisions for bicyclists should be incorporated into project design. ❑ Bicycle parking should be provided in commercial and residential developments. Guidelines can be found at: www.apbp.org resource/resmgr/publications/bicycle_parking_guidel ines.pdf ❑ If near a trailway or bicycle route, extra consideration should be given to bicycle accessibility such as bike lanes on internal roadways,bicycle parking and other amenities. ❑ Drive-thru lanes at uses such as banks and fast-food restaurants should also be accessible for bicycles. Waiver: Upon finding by the Building Inspector, Village Engineer, Planning Board or Board of Trustees that, due to the particular character or limited nature of development or change in use or to special conditions peculiar to a site, the submission of a final site plan, or certain portions of information normally required as part of the site development plan, is inappropriate or unnecessary or that strict compliance with said submission requirements will cause extraordinary and unnecessary hardship, such official or Board may waive such submission requirements wherever, in the opinion of such official or Board, such waiver will be consistent with the goal of promoting the public health, safety and general welfare of the community. The findings for granting such waiver shall become a part of the public record. Any waiver request must be made in writing, and include sufficient detailed information for the appropriate authority to make an informed decision. Design Professional's Certification of Completion of Checklist I have fully reviewed the Village of Rye Brook's requirements and certify this application to be a complete submission. I understand that an incomplete plat or incomplete checklist shall be deemed an incomplete submission and shall be returned to the applicant upon determination of such by the appropriate authority. Name(Print) k,/O Ham/ 4PE- �EC> �,PNOSCgp 010 Signature _e 00 m AUw '4t1 Date Site Plan Checklist Page 7 of 7 Short Environmental Assessment Form Part I -Project Information Instructions for Completing Part 1 -Project Information. The applicant or project sponsor is responsible for the completion of Part 1. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding,are subject to public review,and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part I based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item,please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information. Complete all items in Part 1. You may also provide any additional information which you believe will be needed by or useful to the lead agency;attach additional pages as necessary to supplement any item. Part l -Project and Sponsor Information Name of Action or Project: SOLOMONS-POOL Project Location(describe,and attach a location map): 54 LINCOLN AVENUE Brief Description of Proposed Action: REPLACE EXISTING POOL AND PATIO,INSTALL NEW POOL FENCE&WALL,PAVILION&PERGOLA,BUILT-IN BARBECUE, Name of Applicant or Sponsor: Telephone: 203-894-1428 JOHN DE FEO OF STUDER DESIGN ASSOCIATES E-Mail:john@studerdesignassociates.com Address: 679 DANBURY ROAD City/PO: State: Zip Code: RIDGEFIELD CT 06877 1.Does the proposed action only involve the legislative adoption of a plan,local law,ordinance, NO YES administrative rule,or regulation? If Yes,attach a narrative description of the intent of the proposed action and the environmental resources that may be affected in the municipality and proceed to Part 2. If no,continue to question 2. 2. Does the proposed action require a permit,approval or funding from any other governmental Agency? NO YES If Yes,list agency(s name and permit or approval: El ❑ WETLANDS-SITE PLAN APPROVAL;ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD APPROVAL;BUILDING PERMIT 3.a.Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? 3.148acres b.Total acreage to be physically disturbed? _I(D S acres c.Total acreage(project site and any contiguous properties)owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? 3.148 acres 4. Check all land uses that occur on,adjoining and near the proposed action. ❑Urban [_—]Rural(non-agriculture) [:]Industrial ❑Commercial m Residential(suburban) ❑Forest ❑Agriculture ❑Aquatic ❑Other(specify): ❑Parkland Pagel of 3 5. Is the proposed action, NO YES N/A a.A permitted use under the zoning regulations? ❑ ❑ F-1- b. b.Consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan? ❑ ✓❑ ❑ 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the predominant character of the existing built or natural NO YES landscape? ❑ ❑� 7. Is the site of the proposed action located in,or does it adjoin,a state listed Critical Environmental Area? NO YES If Yes,identify: 21 ❑ 8. a.Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels? NO YES b.Are public transportation service(s)available at or near the site of the proposed action? ❑1 ❑ c.Are any pedestrian accommodations or bicycle routes available on or near site of the proposed action? ❑I ❑ 9.Does the proposed action meet or exceed the state energy code requirements? NO YES If the proposed action will exceed requirements,describe design features and technologies: ❑ ❑ 10. Will the proposed action connect to an existing public/private water supply? NO YES If No,describe method for providing potable water: ❑ 11.Will the proposed action connect to existing wastewater utilities? NO YES If No,describe method for providing wastewater treatment: ❑ 12. a.Does the site contain a structure that is listed on either the State or National Register of Historic NO YES Places? a ❑ b.Is the proposed action located in an archeological sensitive area? R ❑ 13.a.Does any portion of the site of the proposed action,or lands adjoining the proposed action,contain NO YES wetlands or other waterbodies regulated by a federal,state or local agency? ❑ b.Would the proposed action physically alter,or encroach into,any existing wetland or waterbody? ❑ If Yes,identify the wetland or waterbody and extent of alterations in square feet or acres: 14. Identify the typical habitat types that occur on,or are likely to be found on the project site. Check all that apply: ❑Shoreline ®Forest ❑Agricultural/grasslands ❑Early mid-successional ® Wetland ❑Urban 21 Suburban 15.Does the site of the proposed action contain any species of animal,or associated habitats,listed NO YES by the State or Federal government as threatened or endangered? RI ❑ 16.Is the project site located in the 100 year flood plain? NO YES 17.Will the proposed action create storm water discharge,either from point or non-point sources? NO YES If Yes, ❑ a.Will storm water discharges flow to adjacent properties?. Q NO [—]YES b.Will storm water discharges be directed to established conveyance systems(runoff and storm drains)? If Yes,briefly describe: Q NO [—]YES Page 2 of 3 18.Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that result in the impoundment of NO YES water or other liquids(e.g.retention pond,waste lagoon,dam)? If Yes,explain purpose and size: ❑ 19.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the location of an active or closed NO YES solid waste management facility? If Yes,describe: ❑ I I 20.Has the site of the proposed action or an adjoining property been the subject of remediation(ongoing or NO YES completed)for hazardous waste? If Yes,describe: I AFFIRM THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Applicant/sponsor�me, JOHN DE FEO, N SCAP RCHITECT Date: FEBRUARY 10,2016 Signature: PRINT FORM Page 3 of 3 EAF Mapper Summary Report Wednesday, February 10, 2016 2:43 PM Disclaimer: The EAF Mapper is a screening tool intended to ass at 0611-95 l' f project sponsors and reviewing agencies in preparing an environmental 135.41-1-19 assessment form(EAF).Not all questions asked in the EAF are 135.41-1-5 135.41-1-1 135'.41-1-1/3135.41-1-26 Y� answered by the EAF Mapper.Additional information on any EAF 135.41-1/25 question can be obtained by consulting the EAF Workbooks. Although 135.41-1-1,4 135'41-1-1_ the EAF Mapper provides the most up-to-date digital data available to DEC,you may also need to contact local or other data sources In order 135.41-1 135.41-1 ` 35-41 \ to obtain data not provided by the Mapper Digital data is not a �� 1 -1-15 35�.41 substitute for agency determinations. 0611.-21 Rye 135.41-1-167C 1 5.41-1,6135.41-1-3 �� f Cpm J� Montre-11 135.49-1-7 �A:u peptf AL91.1 135.49-1-8 iN Toronto 135.49-1-6 � ° 1 .oricard �.- -' 135.49-1-42 �. Roc[Iatr V611.-28 0611 -30 '�;� 135.49-1-9 ig�Datrcit Buttal Alban �Boston Froyidrnce 135.49-1-4.1 Clevdnnd 0611.-29 H iamson Sources Esri,N DeLorme.USGS, 06inferr�p,vrv� OCPrP.,?J3 41EkB o Tr a�.F"rYAERE, Espen,METI,Esr,Chna +ong Kong;E�ri Pittsburgh 0 U Interrnap. {Thailsnd),Mapmylndia t t7�111ap3 ntbus Hafr+*�rHnv nail � NRCAN. mntributors.and tife81Usg ConununTyi Esri apan,MET].Es n China Of;11.-69 ` Wachington� - Part 1 /Question 7 [Critical Environmental No Area] Part 1 /Question 12a [National Register of No Historic Places] Part 1 /Question 12b [Archeological Sites] No Part 1 /Question 13a[Wetlands or Other Yes-Digital mapping information on local and federal wetlands and Regulated Waterbodies] waterbodies is known to be incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. Part 1 /Question 15[Threatened or No Endangered Animal] Part 1 /Question 16[100 Year Flood Plain] No Part 1 /Question 20[Remediation Site] No Short Environmental Assessment Form- EAF Mapper Summary Report , Agency Use Only ]If applicable] Project: Date: Short Environmental Assessment Form Part 2 -Impact Assessment Part 2 is to be completed by the Lead Agency. Answer all of the following questions in Part 2 using the information contained in Part 1 and other materials submitted by the project sponsor or otherwise available to the reviewer. When answering the questions the reviewer should be guided by the concept"Have my responses been reasonable considering the scale and context of the proposed action?" No,or Moderate small to large impact impact may may occur occur 1. Will the proposed action create a material conflict with an adopted land use plan or zoning 1:1 Elregulations? 2. Will the proposed action result in a change in the use or intensity of use of land? ❑ ❑ 3. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of the existing community? ❑ ❑ 4. Will the proposed action have an impact on the environmental characteristics that caused the EJ 1:1establishment of a Critical Environmental Area(CEA)? 5. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change in the existing level of traffic or El 1:1affect existing infrastructure for mass transit,biking or walkway? 6. Will the proposed action cause an increase in the use of energy and it fails to incorporate El 1:1reasonably available energy conservation or renewable energy opportunities? 7. Will the proposed action impact existing: ❑ ❑ a.public/private water supplies? b.public/private wastewater treatment utilities? ❑ ❑ 8. Will the proposed action impair the character or quality of important historic,archaeological, El El or aesthetic resources? 9. Will the proposed action result in an adverse change to natural resources(e.g.,wetlands, El 1:1waterbodies,groundwater, air quality,flora and fauna)? 10. Will the proposed action result in an increase in the potential for erosion,flooding or drainage El 1:1problems? 11. Will the proposed action create a hazard to environmental resources or human health? ❑ ❑ PRINT FORM Pagel of 2 Age n Use Only lit applicable] Project: Date: Short Environmental Assessment Form Part 3 Determination of Significance For every question in Part 2 that was answered"moderate to large impact may occur",or if there is a need to explain why a particular element of the proposed action may or will not result in a significant adverse environmental impact,please complete Part 3. Part 3 should,in sufficient detail,identify the impact,including any measures or design elements that have been included by the project sponsor to avoid or reduce impacts. Part 3 should also explain how the lead agency determined that the impact may or will not be significant.Each potential impact should be assessed considering its setting, probability of occurring,duration,irreversibility,geographic scope and magnitude. Also consider the potential for short- term,long-term and cumulative impacts. ❑ Check this box if you have determined,based on the information and analysis above,and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action may result in one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts and an environmental impact statement is required. Check this box if you have determined,based on the information and analysis above,and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action will not result in any significant adverse environmental impacts. Name of Lead Agency Date Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(if different from Responsible Officer) PRINT FORM Page 2 of 2 s �• _a ► s r i -- , T / i• T - � r - i ';EiW VW •r.. s - 4, „�; r ��a ���'a r, ��•��� AWNOO�le MOONI-1 t79 • • • zc cCZZ ■ a y g w p �v ■ J v �W p 7 3 .�.�)aa�a al>w ��a_ ��< ■ c I.>vt w� all � 6MC LO'£0'9LOZ sua.uolac��fiuirav4\¢ue.uoloSl-Wo11S Z wZ Z. z - 6 LL z Z UYZ Qatl JQ a IA g Oa7Q�QFmw W / I W mb ujpp zZf Z Oco ¢40. z a rngaoz � / f�N MC N10 9 t 3w I z 0 pia ILL Qui Y0 0 ji zom \ V I a 3a; 4 w S \ W zO J W 1 N _ ✓1 L-1 C Z Z - F two a --A Toll - 6MC LO'£0'9LOZ sua.uulac\sfiuirae,4\sue.uoloSl-Wo11S AM l k = u � 4 Nv Pon 3 I , o 9 c Pz x y - 100"d! y \ 4 oil No c • s Cq ✓cc3 v • _ �w0_ �. a s- 77—)GAHIGow ��< <• all E-7777—77777-7777-777,7 LU Z u \ z q \ Z Na p LU a p CCZz _ two Q GAH GOA E�.>vtw� 77—) 6MC LO'£0'9LOZ sua.uulac�sfiuirae�4\sue.uoloSl-Wo11S 10 O _ I1 I �y�l �I LA �. RH \ Z g Z g: Sa 4 F'. xl j � 3 ❑9 8 O�O,>O.. O�O 9 o o � y� — 3 F �� � I�}�•,,II\ � �N I z� LLJ oz;p w W _ - a F , �U ■ _4 oQ�LL a u w owe ■ .....a.)w <. E�.>vtw� 6MC VO'£"9LOZ sua.uulac�sfiuirae,4\sue.uoloSl-Wo11S J- (n � O LU --- N — O Z kz� O f _ U _ W In LU d' F �1I- 7 - u-I ai al T J H LU Tt- C' '6. RL > U - = k - _ k Z o U F _ to LU W K r� F W 11. m Z Y W -- ~ = O U U _U LUZ Ll = W z - a - 03 m vi - x 7 - u r u Z -------------- -IT- fir n. U Z � I I F - _ Y ® W W - L---J W O v Z O 1 O w W W Z o 7 _ W ti LU Z I o IL v�W �W�c r Qv ■ ,_ - .F - .� LLJ p ....aauw �'n o�;3 LAD1 ■ c .>vt w� all 6h+C'LO'£0'9LOZ sua.uulacYsfiuirae�4\sue.uoloSl-Wo11:S = S £ G = -3 - - - �. � N HIM, � �FT'� O y r ' w t 1 liti MW oil y - z y n uj, _ �. L 3 3 O 4 - tw 4 — Y L O 1 b t O E f Y PE oil 11 H! in 5 4 - 1 2 _ 6\:=Yf d 3 S £ O Y O o o r s O i S^ % g t o HIa £ s. a d a 3 3 3 8 UOR loll , ° u�m_ s�_�._� e� Mme, s�..� _ �, _,✓ , _�_- �. �. - .ten d __ 3 d d<. nu .a u� � �u�� �. �e. __. � n_o,=_ 3,< s r � z - G s e r lit 1 r e e Hs No jw Hs w owool 'NEAR ¢ e a ,oUs zc cCZZ ■ a y - s J v �W p OW�3 a �Q,< ■ 2 av 6h+C'5c'IA'9LOZ sua.uolac��fiuirav4\¢ue.uoloSl-Wo11S Z co Z' Z - 6 LL z Z U / E ail o eN'YZ Qatl JQ LULL w0cc 0 �zz� z \ \y yg¢aOz w10 9 t 7,555555 I z 0 pia 0 z0 \ I - a 3a; \ I z \ \ \ e Aq WCD 1 N _ ✓1 L-1 C Z - F two Toll10 - 6h+C'5c'IA'9LOZ sua.uolac\�fiuirav4\¢ue.uoloSl-Wo11S WIN K - ��, - g I o , UH z - A AMS- t 4 , 3 HHC I , o 9 c i06too U Z 11 \ x y \ 4 ----------- o s Cq ✓cc3 ��� • _ LIJ av - 6h+C'5c'IA'9LOZ sua.uolac��fiuirav4\¢ue.uoloSl-Wo11:S W NET wn ON HIM ISM On Z u EIP111,11111 AIM AV' 222222 m q \ Z a ;I "IX %, p CCZz .F - �z cq ✓cc3 , _ two 6h+C'5c'IA'9LOZ sua.uolac��fiuirav4\¢ue.uoloSl-Wo11S 10 a4 It 10 \ Z 4 - Z xl � 3 h o U) L C7LLJ 3g ��UO�U \1'= � I 7J O I �� � \1�l ❑9 �8 Lu 4h4ii"' fn aLa 2 h � \�I � O.. O�O O sz O w � \ 9 o o � F , - 3 F �� � I�}�•,,II\ � �N I z� LLJ oz;p w W _ - a .F , �U ■ _4 o Q cLL 3 �LLJu two O W 7 3 5 <- ■ av .- 6h+C'5c'L"9LOZ sua.uulac�sfiuirae�4\sue.uoloSl-Wo11S N - Z � O W N w ,L^� 00 vVi JU O IL o Z II" III c _— W ---= Z � — _ og M — al T J H L 11 .. m Z o U F _ rs �^ d n� N W K 11. N -- ~ I? Z Y W U LU W D •l N D g Q W z �. Q r D v' d m w Z z UOf - ill _ m vi Z w O u - 3 I --------------------- — _ Z ® I � I I F I iD I - _ Y C W W - L---L W Z 7 N W W d ! 3 W Z o a 7 - W ti Lu z O o J m 3 -7 o f z v =Z Z G ■ - = a _ �W�c r Qv ■ ,_ - LLJ p av in Am 1H m 6h+C'5c'IA'9LOZ sua.uolacY�fiuirav4\¢ue.uoloSl-Wo11:S = S £ G = ' w 8 D- - y - z 1 3 o g O a 4 L 3 3 ph imp y Y - y PE � � � O O _ _ 4 2 _ � g w 3_ E3 Q He W oil O o o r s 3 w - O i Q s 2 g t Hun Ku a an ; z s - s s sO ma .: WHI 11 a d a 3 3 3 y [ 11 a 8 G - 3,< s r � z - G 011 Mill e r r e z Ha Fw H - w 3 3 a.$ a PUI oiz U{> ay" �'�t cjz� ggrO > ?b9 f �od ZJSpp. �g cy� u� I I ozc $ = 9 log ANI C $- / rl z� Its' /•A I o 18 rn linlil vi/1 I/ ppm _cl S "tea f o A N u —1 u o B �8g eQ GtiJ � F. a~ .yO �io� it om w\ 1 f �' ,Op 694 rn� t :B m -u=D 0 M M-1 IM: Z rn rn r eo me mmM0 0 10 > o� 7 rn z 0A O 0 �� RA(P/i Sr9Q n J O[m > 10 m� Z 10 D�D (n �m 6) b Am a 0 0 7p � Z Z n s ;F �� 0 F z0 Z D N +°� 0 0 — < rnN��fll EER N 0�� (7 moC, tiz Q Z0 W W 0 'oP 0 U z E Q O a 0 ��N0 0�o s. 4� z =� Q m� �o 0 �v (YW jr n 615 Hd)VN Z aIL ly 7;W � p( 0 OWmw `0 o o UJ LL O Q~w to C e g C? W o co `J N m� ^\ 0 o RI �7; CIA GE 3 e� ao J< a 1 g �-----_ -- ---'" t % ci 2\0 a a N b ziz° D I moa YO I �// zs �e�fyl ¢dLL s � / II II < _ Z I�z (n ((w %I I I m vim+ I qqqq I II d 0n! II m I a OD j o I _ 'r iII IIIa< l Z b co 3 zz.� �aY3 l j �Fg Oufj vi > Q <z ZO W F U" . Z == ZZ WN ON sjti aN NS W33,, O€01 3�ryj(( LL I py\ W< SON m� I SS 0Z 4^ \ I I V1 Fd 0 m$ io I yp zr 0 GF o .00SFtFOm J S �{ a 3 < aom a z3.51 o�0 �rc, ' .bqt N �� NFu WoZLL z— X011 CZ] o p OZD 3�tWgqi Z=04 •CB'g�� ^� Q)�y os z3° 4 4q Oho CO tl All ..................................................................... '71 \ /� ,P. � �� a /�/� l Jam'//'/'/ 0/- J 17 It- M; z ^� oa5@� c W W 44 nacos$ - Aim Li� 3 z a � W - o O o L - - =I z z 17 - Q Q ww N N N a d O O � o � a saki uas u615,9p 6U//aa(Q6tla y 6ug1nsuo- USO�nN'wooaaana T --d6uiaaubo uosnT 3nN3nV N�OOW bS + 6005'85£'bi6 £090T Au suield aIigM'STZ mins Aempeoaq glaou 009 3ON301S32i NOWOIOS =)d6uijaaui6ua uoisr'y OON NV�d 1081NOO 1N3WI03SW NIOS02i3 COV Z o N - i ME ell z j 1 - o i� Pig D I's_ I aI�Ms ihw °k m i �jl i` I w o § ago5 p z i Qu i-"(( i- q o w o - 8n new ., a o i WI �w Z ¢ § p 0 V FREDERICK R CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. PLANNING,TRANSPORTATION,ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT RYE, NEW YORK FAIRFIELD,CONNECTICUT DAVID H.STOLMAN MEMORANDUM AICR PD PRESIDENT MICHAEL A.GALANTE To: Robert 1. Goodman, Chairman, and the EXECUTIVE V(CE PRESIDENT Planning y Board of the Village of Rye Brook V[CE PRESIDENT 35o THEO.FREMDAVE. Date: April 8 2016 RYE,NEW YORK 10580 p > 914 967-654° FAX:914 967-6615 Subject: Bowman Avenue Development "Strip" Property— CONNICTICUT 203 255-3100 Application to Amend the Subdivision and Site Plans X03 X55-3100 HUDSON VALLEY 845 297-6056 As requested, we reviewed applications submitted by Rye Ridge Park, LONG ISLAND LLC, on behalf of the property owner, K&M Realty Group, Ltd., to amend 516 364-4544 the approved subdivision plat and site plan for the Bowman Avenue www.fpciark.com Development parkland (a.k.a. the "Strip" portion of the development) last email@fpdark.com approved January 28, 2014, and approve new Wetlands and Steep Slopes Work Permits, to construct K&M Realty Group, Ltd., to modify the design of the municipal park and add parking areas for use by the park and Rye Ridge Plaza on the property known as Section 141.26, Block 1, Lot 1 on the Town of Rye Tax Map, located on the south side of Bowman Avenue west of and adjacent to the Rye Ridge Plaza Shopping Center in the Cl District and the Bowman Avenue Scenic Road Overlay District. Property Description and History The 4.039-acre property owned by K&M Realty Group, Ltd. is comprised of two tax lots situated at the confluence of the Blind Brook and its East Branch. The Lower Blind Brook Pond covers a large portion of the total acreage of the property. The developable land of the 2.12-acre Strip is almost entirely located within the 100-foot regulated wetland buffer of the pond and the Blind Brook watercourse, and is within the 100-year flood plain of the Blind Brook. The Strip is subject to flooding during intense storms. The entire property was the subject of an application for site plan approval originally submitted by K and M Realty in 1994. At the direction of the then Board of Trustees, the approval authority and Lead Agency for the environmental review under SEQRA, the proposed development plan received a positive declaration and an environmental impact statement was 1 FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. PLANNING,TRANSPORTATION,ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT RYE,NEW YORK FAIRFIELD,CONNECTICUT required. The site plans were approved in 2007 for development of 10 attached, single- family town homes on the "Peninsula" portion of the property and public parkland on the Strip. The site plans were approved by the Board of Trustees, and wetlands and steep slopes work permits were approved by the Planning Board. In subsequent years, the Applicant submitted two ,additional applications to amend the site plan and wetlands and steep slopes permits related to changes to the residential development on the Peninsula, which is nearing completion. The last approval of site plan amendments occurred on January 28, 2014, and amended Wetlands and Steep Slopes Permits were last approved on February 14, 2013. The amended wetland and steep slopes permits are expired at this time. Project Description The current subdivision and site plan applications seek modification of the development plan for the public open space on the Strip. The revised development plan proposes to expand the parking area of the Rye Ridge Shopping Center into a 0.49-acre portion of the Strip and adjacent area to be Village park land. The 0.49-acre area would be subdivided from the Strip for construction of 54 parking spaces to become shared parking for shopping center and the park. The site plan for the proposed 1.63-acre park would be modified to accommodate the approved park site features in the smaller lot area to become park land. Approval of the current application will require approval of new wetlands and steep slopes permits pursuant to the Chapter 245 and Chapter 213 of the Village Code. The site plan and subdivision applications were referred to the Planning Board for a report and recommendation by the Board of Trustees, who has jurisdiction over both applications and a declared intent to serve as the Lead Agency for SEQRA review of the applications. The Planning Board is the approval authority for the wetland and steep slopes permits and an involved agency under SEQRA, if it agrees with the intended lead agency of the Trustees. Review We reviewed the following applications, documents and other material submitted in support of the application: 2 FREDERICK R CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. PLANNING,TRANSPORTATION,ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT RYE,NEW YORK FAIRFIELD,CONNECTICUT 1. Application for Subdivision of Land dated 3/18/16 2. Application for Site Plan Approval dated 4/1/16 3. Site Plan Submittal Review Check List dated 4/1/16 4. Full Environmental Assessment Form (Part 1) and EAF Mapper Summary Report dated 3/14/16 5. Rye Ridge Park Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan prepared by John Meyer Consulting, Armonk, N.Y., dated 3/16/16 6. Letter to the Planning Board from John Meyer Consulting, Armonk, N.Y., dated April 1, 2016 7. Letter to the Board of Trustees from John Meyer Consulting, Armonk, N.Y., dated March 17, 2016 8. ALTA/ACSM Land Title Survey of Rye Ridge Shopping Center, Sheet ALTA-1, prepared by John Meyer Consulting, Armonk, N.Y., dated 7/12/13, revised 7/25/13 9. Survey of Property, Sheet SU-1, prepared by John Meyer Consulting, Armonk, N.Y., dated 11/19/1993, revised 10/21/2008 10. Preliminary Subdivision Plan, prepared by John Meyer Consulting, Armonk, N.Y., dated 3/1/16, revised 3/31/16 11. Engineer's Site Plans prepared by John Meyer Consulting, Armonk, N.Y.: Sheet Number Sheet Title Dated SP-1 Cover Sheet 3/15/16 rev. 3/31/16 SP-2 Existing Conditions Plan 3/15/16 rev. 3/31/16 SP-3 Site Demolition Plan 3/15/16 rev. 3/31/16 SP-4 Site Layout Plan 3/15/16 rev. 3/31/16 SP-5 Site Grading Plan 3/15/16 rev. 3/31/16 SP-6 Site Utilities Plan 3/15/16 rev. 3/31/16 SP-7 Site Erosion and Sediment Control Plan 3/15/16 rev. 3/31/16 SP-8 Site Landscaping Plan 3/15/16 rev. 3/31/16 SP-9 Construction Details 3/15/16 rev. 3/31/16 SP-10 Construction Details 3/15/16 rev. 3/31/16 SP-11 Construction Details 3/15/16 rev. 3/31/16 SP-12 Construction Details 3/15/16 rev. 3/31/16 SP-13 Construction Details 3/15/16 rev. 3/31/16 ZC-1 Zoning Compliance Plan 3/15/16 rev. 3/31/16 Please note that our review is limited to planning and environmental issues. We offer the following comments regarding the applications: 3 FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. PLANNING,TRANSPORTATION,ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT RYE,NEW YORK FAIRFIELD,CONNECTICUT 1. SEQRA. The Trustees determined the proposed action to be an Unlisted Action subject to a coordinated review under SEQRA and a Notice of Intent (NOI) to Declare Lead Agency was circulated to all involved and interested agencies. After 30 days the Board of Trustees will be Lead Agency and will be empowered to make a determination of significance. A positive declaration would require that a supplemental environmental impact statement be prepared. A negative declaration would end the SEQRA process and the application may proceed directly to site plan, wetlands and steep slopes reviews. 2. Completion of the Application. The following items should be submitted for review: a) A current, updated topographic survey of Tax Lot 1; b) A Preliminary Subdivision Plat; and c) A Tree Preservation and Protection Plan in accordance with Chapter 235 of the Village Code. 3. Site Plan. The proposed site plan should address the constraints of the site, which include location in the regulated flood plain and wetland buffer, potential inundation during severe storm events, steep slopes, and proximity to a residential development. Site features should be resilient and able to withstand flooding with minimal or reasonable maintenance and repair. The park should be safe and accessible by vehicles and pedestrians, including the disabled. 4. Wetlands Permit. Most of the construction will occur in the regulated wetland buffer of the Blind Brook and pond. A calculation of the amount of new impervious surface area to be located on the Strip for the parking area should be provided to be the basis for the determination of the amount of mitigation required for loss of functional buffer area in accordance with Chapter 245 of the Village Code. The 100-foot regulated wetland buffer should be shown on the plans. 5. Steep Slopes Work Permit. Without a current topographic survey of the lot, it is not possible to determine if the current grading plan is acceptable at this time. It appears that existing steep slopes will be disturbed and new steep slopes will be created by the grading plan. Disturbance and creation of steep slopes should comply with the requirements of Chapter 213 of the Village Code. 6. Visual Impacts. While the amended park plan will construct a green landscaped area when viewed from the southern-most homes on the Peninsula, the enlarged parking area will be located more than 60 feet closer to the new homes than the 4 FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. PLANNING,TRANSPORTATION,ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT RYE,NEW YORK FAIRFIELD,CONNECTICUT existing parking area and it is much larger than the approved parking area for the park. There will be no space after construction for a planted buffer near Bowman Avenue to screen views of the new 8-foot high retaining wall and cars parked in the new parking area from the homes or Bowman Avenue. Night lighting of the commercial parking lot will increase visual impacts to the homes after dark. We recommend increasing the screening capability of the new plantings at the base of the wall and adding more native trees and shrubs closer to and at the elevation of the parking area and in the area adjacent to Bowman Avenue. 7. Landscape Plan. The landscape plan should be revised to address all the applicable comments in this memorandum. 8. Lighting Plan. Photometric analysis of the lighting plan should be provided for review. The details and specifications for the proposed parking area lighting should be provided. To reduce night lighting impacts to nearby residences, we recommend that lighting in this area should be modified from what is typical in the shopping center to minimize impacts to adjacent homes. 9. Parking. The amended subdivision and site plans will make 54 new parking spaces available to the shopping center and the new park, which will be accessible by the existing western-most curb cut serving the shopping center. All the parking in the shopping center in proximity to the new park should be considered shared parking between the park use and the shopping center uses. 10. Tree Preservation Plan. A tree survey of the strip should be provided to evaluate and locate existing trees on the lot and determine how many trees will be removed for construction of the park and parking area. Trees to be removed will be replaced in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 235 of the Village Code. Trees to remain on the site during construction will require tree protection measures to be in place during the entire construction period. 11. Scenic Road Overlay District (SROD). The parking area and park access will be constructed in the Bowman Avenue SROD. All development in the SROD should comply with the requirements of the district. A 35-foot vegetated buffer is required along the Bowman Avenue frontage of the shopping center property. We look forward to discussion with the Planning Board, and will continue our review when the additional information requested is provided. 5 FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. PLANNING,TRANSPORTATION,ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT RYE,NEW YORK FAIRFIELD,CONNECTICUT Marilyn Timpone-Mohamed, ASLA, AICP Senior Associate/Planning/Environment Cc: Honorable Mayor and the Village Board of Trustees Christopher Bradbury, Village Administrator Michal Nowak, Superintendent of Public Wo�rk/Village Engineer Jennifer Gray, Esq., Village Attorney Steven Silverberg, Esq., for the Applicant Anthony Nestor, for the Applicant j:Wocs2150Wrye brookl538.676.kand m bowman avenue.parksite plan and subdivision amendment.pb intro memo.mtm.doem 6 zc cCZZ ■ a - �W,r , ov Oqc� JU two c I.>Ww� _ 2 04 6MC LO'£0'9LOZ sua.uulac\sfiuirae,4\sue.uoloSl-Wo11S z wz z z U A W YZ Qatl J Q W / I W m b III 3 W z z f Z OF� ¢0. z a rngaoz � Ip 10 9 t I z o �v It I I I 0 Y�0 zom \ V I a 3a; 91 6 W 1 N _ ✓1 L-1 C ,� wZ� • Z l� cz a F 'tea cq o3 ALU' --------- LUo --Aun Oki10 6MC LO'£0'9LOZ sua.uulaclsfiuirae�4\sue.uoloSl-Wo11S j J� 4 a Iii �Of - k its 1 I I o`II // ��� fj>a�1' Ji Z F� - � f i w e i �- O + I 3 9 I, c V> to Z O I N ��''y9Cj yZ 1 \ ���- \ a o U Z 21 y \ 4 _ jH o I- --- y2 St v I FI �� � c • s Cq ✓cc3 v • _ �w0_ �. a s- LU 6MC LO'£0'9LOZ sua.uulac�sfiuirae�4\sue.uoloSl-Wo11:S Z u \ z q \ Z Na RE LU a p CCZz . ...... ............. ....... _ two Q 04 v� � 6MC LO'£0'9LOZ sua.uulac�sfiuirae�4\sue.uoloSl-Wo11S O 0- HN �. •W a , 10 A'.. O 1 ° x \ Z g — Z Sa 4 F'. Q _ o yrs os o j LLJ � 3 h o N z ��UO�U \1'= 7J O I �� \1 l ❑9 8 fn aLa ,.. O�O,>O.. O�O O sz O w � \ 11 Hill 11 11 9 o o � — 3 F �� � I�}�•,,II\ � �N I z� LLJ oz;p w W , �U ■ _ .F 4 OQcLL 3 <J two p W a 3 ■ <- - av - 6MC VO'£"9LOZ sua.uulac�sfiuirae�4\sue.uoloSl-Wo11S J- (n � O LU -- N JY a w — O I W g - •� N - LU I �II- --� < w >Q w u > U - - k - _ k Z O r = U _ - a { m W F-- U) � z y W 1� =� LU ¢ w � J - - a mN - - a oN - a I J d a - ;�l 11 z O < -s o Y ® w J W ® L---J W ,F W � F O v Z O 9 O LU W W Z o --------- LL m Z Lu -- v�W 0 W c r Qv ■ - .F - '= .�m <y- LLJ p OWK93 a- Cn��' ■ Qw- 6h+C'LO'£0'9LOZ sua.uulacYsfiuirae�4\sue.uoloSl-Wo11:S = S £ G = - =6 MG w t MW oil y KE - z y o g O a S 4 p G S ¢ ~O t G 3 a t' t ,x �. w v.� a O 5 uj, _ „o � 'a�.2 u` �. L 3 3 W 4 — YHUI L O 1 E f Y PE ” 5 4 - 1 2 _ 6\:=Yf d 3 S £ O Y O o o r s F P ,11 O L7 O �� W 3 .. O i K _ Q Ms 2 11 S^ % WHg t a £ s. ; H 11 z s - 1 s s .: r - s ss v v„ .a L ° u�m_ s�_�._� e� Mme, s�..� _ �, _,✓ , _�_- �" �. - .ten d __ 3 d d<. nu .a u� � �u�� �" �e. __" � n_o,=_ 3,< s r � z � mid_ r r e c ? G � 3MIN H _ Lq z w � 5 H w a V FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. PLANNING,TRANSPORTATION,ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT RYE,NEW YORK FAIRFIELD,CONNECTICUT DAVID H. STOLMAN MEMORANDUM AICP, PP PRESIDENT To: Robert I. Goodman, Chairman, and the MICHAEL A. GALANTE EXECUTIVE Planning g y Board of the Village of Rye Brook VICE PRESIDENT 35o THEO.FREMD AVE. Date: April 11, 2016 RYE, NEW YORK 1058o 914 967-6540 FAX: 914 967-6615 Subject: 54 Lincoln Avenue—Applications for CONNECTICUT Approval of a Site Plan and a Wetland Permit 203 255-3100 HUDSON VALLEY As requested, we reviewed applications, supporting documents and plans 845 297-6056 submitted by Studer Design Associates (John de Feo) on behalf of property LONG ISLAND owners, Laura and Seth Solomans, for approval of a site plan and Wetlands 5i6 364-4544 Permit to replace an in-ground swimming pool and pool equipment, and www.fpdark.com construct a pool patio, pool enclosure fence, pavilion, a pergola and a email@fpclark.com permanent barbecue area in the rear yard of the property located at 54 Lincoln Avenue in the R-12 District and the Scenic Road Overlay District (SROD), Section 135.49, Block 1, Lot 5 as shown on the Town of Rye Tax Assessor's Map. Property Description The property, through which the Blind Brook flows, is located in Rye Brook and Harrison. The 98,164 square-foot portion of the property located in Rye Brook is currently developed with a two-story residence with an attached garage, parking area and circular driveway, tennis court, swimming pool and pool deck, pool enclosure fencing, a pond, decks, patios and retaining and garden walls. A wooden bridge spans the Blind Brook for access to the Harrison portion of the property. The property slopes gently down to the brook from Lincoln Avenue and there are steep slopes within the regulated channel lines of the brook. Mature woods, landscape trees and other plantings are located throughout the property. Project Description The Applicant proposes to remove the existing swimming pool, pool deck, pool equipment and pool enclosure fence to construct a new swimming FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. PLANNING,TRANSPORTATION,ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT RYE,NEW YORK FAIRFIELD,CONNECTICUT pool, pool deck, pavilion, outdoor barbeque kitchen, pergola and pool enclosure fence. Other work would include grading, steps, a concrete pad for pool equipment, and landscape plantings. Review We reviewed application materials and plans submitted by the Applicant that include the following items: 1. Short Environmental Assessment Form and EAF Mapper Summary Sheet dated February 10, 2016 2. Exterior Building Permit Application 3. Application for Site Plan Approval 4. Wetlands and Watercourse Permit Application Narrative Letter to the Planning Board from Studer Design Associates, Inc., 5. Photograph survey of property 6. Partial Topographic Survey, prepared by Thomas C. Merritts Land Surveyors, P.C., Pleasantville, N.Y. dated January 12, 2016, revised February 3, 2016 7. Sheet A-1, Proposed Pavilion and Pergola, prepared by John Clements, Architect, Ridgefield, C.T., dated December 15, 2015, revised February 3, 2016 8. Sheet 1, Erosion and Sediment Control Plan, prepared by Fusion Engineering, P.C., White Plains, N.Y., dated February 4, 2016 9. Landscape Architect's Plans, prepared by Studer Design Associates, Inc., Ridgefield, C.T.: Sheet Number Sheet Title Dated LA-1 Proposed Pool Site Plan 2/9/16 rev. 3/3/16 LA-2 Proposed Pool Layout and Grading Plan 2/9/16 rev. 3/3/16 LA-3 Proposed Pool Area Take-Offs 2/9/16 rev. 3/3/16 LA-4 Proposed Pool Planting Plan 2/9/16 rev. 3/3/16 LA-5 Proposed Pool Details 2/9/16 rev. 3/3/16 LA-6 Proposed Pool Notes and Specifications 2/9/16 rev. 3/3/16 Please note that our review is limited to planning and environmental issues. We offer the following comments regarding the application: 2 FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. PLANNING,TRANSPORTATION,ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT RYE,NEW YORK FAIRFIELD,CONNECTICUT 1. Topographic Survey. The Applicant provided a current partial topographic survey, which encompasses the rear yard where the proposed construction would be located, and requests a waiver of the requirement to provide a complete topographic survey. 2. Wetland Delineation. The wetland delineation cited in the narrative provided by Studer Design was performed in 2001. The delineation should be updated, and the report provided for review. Any changes in the location of the flagged wetlands should be noted on the plans. 3. Blind Brook Stream Channel. The work to be performed is within 100 feet of the mapped and regulated channel of the Blind Brook. A stream control permit must be obtained from the Westchester County Department of Public Works and Transportation (WC DPW), which should be contacted for the review and permit information. The new pool enclosure fence would be located within the mapped channel lines of the brook on the steep slopes adjacent to the brook. We do not recommend locating the fence within the regulated channel of the brook. 4. Erosion and Sediment Control Plan. The erosion and sediment control plan does not include protection of the brook from the impacts of the construction of the pool enclosure fence adjacent to it. The erosion and sediment control plan should be revised to provide erosion and sediment control for the fence construction. 5. Site Plan. Most of the proposed site plan for the new pool area would be within the 100-foot regulated wetland buffer of the Blind Brook. A calculation of the total amount of additional area to be disturbed for construction of the proposed site plan should be provided as the basis for the determination of the amount of mitigation area is required for loss or disturbance of the functional buffer area in accordance with Chapter 245, Wetlands, of the Village Code. 6. Tree Preservation and Protection. It appears that the proposed site plan does not include the removal of any regulated trees. We look forward to discussion with the Planning Board. Marilyn Timpone-Mohamed, ASLA, AICP Senior Associate/Planning/Environment 3 FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. PLANNING,TRANSPORTATION,ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT RYE,NEW YORK FAIRFIELD,CONNECTICUT cc: Honorable Mayor and the Village Board of Trustees Christopher Bradbury, Village Administrator Michal Nowak, Superintendent of Public Works/Village Engineer Jennifer L. Gray, Esq., Village Attorney John De Feo, RLA, for the Applicant J•IDOCS215001Rye Brook1538.674.54 Lincoln Avenue.Site Plan and Wetlands Permit.intro naenao.nitni.docx 4 April 14, 2016 RESOLUTION SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING A SITE PLAN AND WETLANDS PERMIT FOR 54 LINCOLN AVENUE VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK PLANNING BOARD WHEREAS, Studer Design Associates (John de Feo) submitted an application on behalf of property owners, Laura and Seth Solomans, for approval of a site plan and a Wetlands Permit to replace an in-ground swimming pool and pool equipment, and construct a pool patio, pool enclosure fence, a pavilion, a pergola and a permanent barbecue area in the rear yard of the property located at 54 Lincoln Avenue in the R-12 District and the Scenic Road Overlay District (SROD), Section 135.49, Block 1, Lot 5 as shown on the Town of Rye Tax Assessor's Map. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Board of the Village of Rye Brook shall hold a public hearing on May 12, 2016 at 7:30p.m. in Village Hall, 938 King Street, Rye Brook, New York to consider the above-referenced application, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Planning Board, pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) determines the Proposed Action to be a Type 2 Action requiring no further review pursuant to the requirements of SEQRA; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Applicant is hereby directed to comply with Section 250-40 of the Village Code regarding notification of the public hearing. On motion by , seconded by , Mr. Nowak, Superintendent of Public Works, called the roll: MR. ACCURSO Voting MR. GRZAN Voting MR. MORLINO Voting MR. RICHMAN Voting MRS. SCHOEN Voting MR. TARTAGLIA Voting CHAIRMAN GOODMAN Voting •� a 3 ANVd39aia 3Aa011>18Vd]DON lk�l n H a I V NV-1d NOSINVdWOO - t� lo � V1 •tizrei r 1 II 1 i � / p 1 rs I� 1 J I 0 1 rl ♦ i cw 1 _ I 1 1 ' � r [ Q N I I 1 l a I W Ur 06 W � I � I / %`� IA m I I W t l I I f� II r I 1 it I I I I I 1 I i I I I I 11 I 1 I � 1 Dolph Rotfeld Engineering, P.C. M E M O TO: VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK PLANNING BOARD CHAIRMAN ROBERT GOODMAN FROM: Anthony Oliveri, P.E. SUBJECT: Rye Ridge Park Bowman Avenue and South Ridge Street DATE: April 8, 2016 With regard to the above mentioned project, this office has received and reviewed the following: 1. Plan entitled: "Amended Site Plan Approval, Rye Ridge Park", prepared by JMC, last revised 3/31/2016; 2. Plan entitled: "Preliminary Subdivision Plan, Rye Ridge Shopping Center", prepared by JMC, last revised 3/31/2016; 3. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan prepared by JMC, dated 3/16/2016. Our preliminary comments are as follows: 1. Subdivision plan is labeled as "Rye Ridge Shopping Center" , should this be "Rye Ridge Park". also a number of variances are identified in the cover letter by the applicant; a full zoning analysis should be undertaken by the Building Department. 2. We note that the Site Plan Amendment is labeled as "Rye Ridge Park", This includes changes to the Shopping Center site plan, which will also be amended as part of this application. It may be necessary to submit the site plan for the entire parcel. 3. A Westchester County Sanitary Sewer trunk main crosses the subject parcel and adjacent shopping center parcel, review by the Westchester County Department of Environmental Facilities is required. Of particular concern will be the placement of a retaining wall over the County Trunk line. 4. Parking counts and requirements should be reviewed by the Village Building Department and Village Planner. 5. The proposed site plan notes asphalt sidewalk, we recommend concrete. 6. The proposed work is partially located within the 100 year flood plain. Per Chapter 130 of the Village code the applicant must demonstrate no net reduction to flood volumes within the base flood elevation area and no net increase to Rye Brook Site Plan Review - Rye Ridge Park April 8, 2016 Page 2 of 3 water surface elevations. Cut and fill calculations should be provided as well as FIRM/FEMA mapping to establish base flood elevation. This as well as any other requirements of this chapter would apply. 7. Percolation test as well as deep test pits must be performed to demonstrate the viability of porous pavements and open bottom detention galleries with respect to infiltration properties and groundwater elevations. A minimum 0.5"/hr infiltration rate is required for porous pavements. 8. Details included on the plan such as raising /converting manholes and catch basins, doghouse manholes, water service connection could not be located on the site plan, please coordinate the details and site plan layout. 9. The Stormtech chamber details are generic, actual details and layout of the system should be included in the detail sheets, including the outlet control structure and cross sections noting water elevations at the various storm events for clarity. 10. The handicap space detail dimensions do not match the layout pan. 11. It is not clear where concrete drop curbs are to be located, the plan notes asphalt walkways. 12. The SWPPP must include a discussion regarding how this project qualifies under the redevelopment criteria of the Design Manual. 13. A detailed construction sequence must be included on the plan and in the SWPPP. 14. The SWPPP notes that the CPv volume is reduced through the use of Green Infrastructure, this must be supported with calculations. 15. The SWPPP should contain pertinent soil maps as noted in the report. The Web Soil Survey seems to indicate a dual hydrologic group designation for much of the site (A/D). this would indicate high groundwater levels or in well drained areas, high infiltration rates (A soil group). This is not discussed and no soil test pits were conducted to establish this. 16. The detail for porous pavement indicates a perforated pipe at the lowest level of the gravel infill. This pipe should be placed higher so as to provide for the noted water quality storage volume and runoff reductions credited in the SWPPP. It should be clearly demonstrated in the SWPPP at what elevations the water quality volume is achieved in the system. Rye Brook Site Plan Review - Rye Ridge Park April 8, 2016 Page 3 of 3 17. The CDS unit chosen seem to be marginal in capacity; the 100 year storm event exceeds the design capacity of the unit by 0.7 cfs. In addition, it seems that this unit is proposed to have a drain grate inlet; it is not clear if these units are designed to inlet water from a grate as proposed. We will be happy to continue our review once additional information is received, Than You C: M. Nowak M. Mohamed C. Bradbury M. Izzo J. Gray ijesler Referral Review vCorTl Pursuant to Section 239 L,M and N of the General Municipal Law and Section 277.61 of the County Administrative Code Robert P.Astorino County Executive County Planning Board April 11, 2016 Christopher Bradbury, Village Administrator Rye Brook Village Hall 938 King Street Rye Brook, NY 10573-1226 Subject: Referral File No. RYB 16-003—Rye Ridge Park Site Plan Amendment; Lead Agency Dear Mr. Bradbury: The Westchester County Planning Board has received a notice of intent to be Lead Agency, pursuant to the NYS Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQR) for the above referenced site plan amendment application to modify the design of a passive park for the Village of Rye Brook which is associated with the previously approved Bowman Avenue residential development. The park is now proposed to include a dog run, walkways, benches and emergency boat launch area and parking for the Rye Ridge Plaza. We have no objection to the Rye Brook Board of Trustees assuming Lead Agency status for this review. While we respectfully request that we be sent additional materials concerning this application as it moves through the review process. We offer the following initial comment under the provisions of Section 239 L, M and N of the General Municipal Law and Section 277.61 of the County Administrative Code: County stream control mrmit. The site abuts Blind Brook, which is designated a County stream channel in this location. The Westchester County Department of Public Works and Transportation (WC DPWT) must be listed as an involved Agency under SEQR because a County Stream Control Permit is required. The applicant must contact WC DPWT for this review. A Stream Control Permit application is attached. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this matter. Respectfully, WESTCHESTER COUNTY PLANNING BOARD Edward Buroughs, AICP Commissioner EEB.'LH cc: Jeffrey A. Dean, Senior Engineer(Civil),County Department of Public Works and Transportation 432 Michaehan Office Building 148 Martine:Avenue White Plains, New York 10601 Telephone: (914)995-.1400 Website! westchestergov.com Permit No. Stream COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORTATION 148 MARTINE AVENUE WHITE PLAINS,NEW YORK 10601 APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO DO WORK WITHIN CHANNEL LINES OR WITHIN 100 FEET THEREFROM (To Be Executed in Triplicate) TO: Jay T.Pisco,P.E. Commissioner,Public Works and Transportation Application is hereby made for a permit,under Chapter 241,Article III of the Westchester County Administrative Code,to carry out the following described project within channel lines or within 100 feet therefrom. 1. Applicant (Owner or Agent) 2. Address (Business or Residence) Zip Code Telephone 3. Owner Deed recorded in Liber Page 4. Tax Lot(s) Tax Block(s) Sheet No.(s) 5. Name and Location of Stream (Stream) (Municipality) 6. Location of Stream feet downstream from (Highway) 7. Proposed project and extent 8. Work To Be Started To Be Completed 9. Water Elevations(F.E.M.A.Flood Insurance) 10 Yr. 100 Yr. 10. Applicant attaches herewith THREE copies of the plans showing location of work,distances to nearest highway crossings, and details of design stamped by a Professional Engineer or Registered Architect. Applicant will furnish additional data when required by the Commissioner. 11. List all approvals,certifications or permits required by Federal, State or Local Agencies: _ Westchester County Department of Public Works and Transportation Witness: (Applicant's Signature) Approval and consent to grant the permit requested by this applicant is hereby given by the duly authorized municipal representative. NOTE: Application must be signed by municipality prior to submission. Signature and Title Municipality Date THE PERMIT IS ISSUED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING TERMS,AGREEMENTS,COVENANTS AND CONDITIONS 1) The term"Commissioner"shall mean the Commissioner of Public Works and Transportation of the County of Westchester or his authorized representative. 2) The term"Permittee"shall mean the applicant obtaining the permit,or his or its duly authorized agents or representatives. 3) The Commissioner,by issuing the permit,assumes no liability or responsibility on his part or on the part of the County of Westchester of any kind or nature for this sufficiency of the design or the operations covered by the Permit. 4) The Permittee assumes all risks in the operations covered by the permit and shall be solely responsible and answerable in damages for all accidents or injuries to persons or property. 5) The Permittee shall indemnify and save harmless the County of Westchester and the Commissioner of Public Works and Transportation from any and all claims,suits,losses,damage to property or injury to persons of whatsoever kind and nature, whether direct or indirect,arising out of the Permittee's operations under the permit,and the Permittee agrees to reimburse the County of Westchester and the Commissioner of Public Works and Transportation for all expenses,costs of judgments to which they may be put arising from such operation. 6) No changes in the plans or in the nature and extent of the work shall be made without the Commissioner's written consent. The project shall be subject at all times to inspection by the Commissioner. 7) The Permittee agrees that,during the performance of the work,the Permittee will not cause or allow in any way or manner any unreasonable interference with the free flow of the stream,and that the Permittee will not place,store or dump any materials,equipment or debris in or about the stream or channel in any way which may cause interference with the free flow of water. 8) The Permittee,upon completion of the work,shall cause to be removed from within the channel lines and within 100 feet therefrom all equipment,surplus materials,debris and structures not shown on the approved plans. 9) Within 30 days after completion,the Permittee shall certify that the work has been completed in accordance with the permit and the approved plans and that all unauthorized channel obstructions have been removed. 10) Final inspection of all work authorized by the permit will be made by the Commissioner to determine that the work has been performed in compliance with the permit. 11) Completed work shall be diligently maintained by the owner of the land to prevent any danger of obstruction of the stream, water course,easement or right-of-way bounded by channel lines by reason of erosion or the collapse or other impairment of the completed work. 12) The permit shall be subject to all applicable zoning regulations of the municipality within which the land to which the permit applies is located,to Workmen's Compensation Law,Disability Benefits Law and to all other regulations thereof applying to the construction of buildings and other structures. Every building permit or certificate of occupancy issued by any municipality shall be subject to the limitations and requirements imposed by or pursuant to the Westchester County Stream Control Law,with respect to any work covered by such permit or certificate. In event of any conflict,the more restrictive provision shall prevail. 13) The Commissioner reset ves the right to revoke or cancel the permit at any time should the Permittee fail to comply with any of the terms,agreements,covenants and conditions of the permit. 14) The permit does not give any property rights,either in real property or material,or any exclusive privileges. It does not authorize any injury to public or private property,any invasion of property rights,any occupation of riparian or County property,or any infringement of State or local laws or regulations. Local and State permits and consents must be obtained when necessary. 15) The work must be completed on or before the stated completion date and shall be under the direction of a licensed professional engineer or licensed architect until it is completed. 16) The Permit is not in force and effect until the executed acceptance form is received by the Commissioner. 17) SPECIAL CONDITIONS for this Permit are set forth on the attached sheet. 18) The application,the Special conditions and the following approved plans are part of the permit: April 14, 2016 RESOLUTION SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING FOR STEEP SLOPES AND WETLANDS PERMITS FOR AN AMENDED SITE PLAN SUBMITTED BY RYE RIDGE PARK, LLC FOR PROPERTY ON BOWMAN AVENUE VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK PLANNING BOARD WHEREAS, Rye Ridge Park, LLC, on behalf of the property owner, K&M Realty Group, Ltd., submitted applications for Wetlands and Steep Slopes Permits for an amendment of the approved subdivision plat and site plan for the Bowman Avenue Development park land (a.k.a. the "Strip" portion of the development) last approved January 28, 2014, to modify the design of the municipal park and add parking areas for use by the park and Rye Ridge Plaza on the property known as Section 141.26, Block 1, Lot 1 on the Town of Rye Tax Map, located on the south side of Bowman Avenue west of and adjacent to the Rye Ridge Plaza Shopping Center in the C1 District and the Bowman Avenue Scenic Road Overlay District; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board is the Approval Authority for this application pursuant to Chapters 213 and 245 of the Village Code. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Board of the Village of Rye Brook shall hold a public hearing on May 12, 2016 at 7:30p.m. at Village Hall, 938 King Street, Rye Brook, New York to consider the above-referenced application. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Applicant is hereby directed to comply with Section 250-40 of the Village Code regarding notification for the public hearing. On motion by , and seconded by Mr. Michel Nowak, Superintendent of Public Works, called the roll: Domenic Accurso, Jr. Voting John Grzan Voting Sal Morlino Voting Jeffrey Richman Voting Amy Schoen Voting Daniel Tartaglia Voting Robert I. Goodman, Chairman Voting DR, � .� (G GGCv-JV V G V 144 VvJ j+ 19 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK MAYOR 938 King Street, Rye Brook, N.Y. 10573 ADMINISTRATOR Paul S. Rosenberg (914) 939-1121 Fax (914) 939-0242 Christopher J. Bradbury www.iyebrook.org TRUSTEES Susan R. Epstein David M. Heiser Jason A. Klein Jeffrey B. Rednick April 1, 2016 To: Village of Rye Brook Planning Board Attn: Robert I. Goodman, Chairman 938 King Street Rye Brook, N.Y. 10573 Subject: Notification of Intent to Declare Lead Agency Pursuant to 6 NYCRR 617 Dear Sir: The Village of Rye Brook Board of Trustees hereby notifies you that it is reviewing subdivision and site plan applications submitted by Rye Ridge Park, LLC, on behalf of the property owner, K&M Realty Group, Ltd., to amend the approved development plan for the Bowman Avenue Development, Section 141.26, Block 1, Lot 1 on the Town of Rye Tax Map, located on the south side of Bowman Avenue west of the Rye Ridge Plaza Shopping Center, to modify the design of the municipal park and add parking areas for the use of Rye Ridge Plaza. The Village Board of Trustees hereby declares its intent to be the Lead Agency for the review of the action under SEQRA. Enclosed is a Lead Agency Selection Reply Form for your use. Pursuant to SEQRA, the Village Board of Trustees will automatically become the Lead Agency unless you submit a written objection to the Board of Trustees within 30 calendar days of the mailing of this notification. Very truly yours, Paul S. Rosenberg, Mayor and the Village of Rye Brook Board of Trustees ►i r Full Environmental Assessment Form D Part I -Project and Setting MAR 17 2016 Instructions for Completing Part 1 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK Part 1 is to be completed by the applicant or project sponsor. Responses become part o BUI�DIN DEPAD-17RA UhTna, are subject to public review,and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item,please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information;indicate whether missing information does not exist, or is not reasonably available to the sponsor;and,when possible,generally describe work or studies which would be necessary to update or fully develop that information. Applicants/sponsors must complete all items in Sections A&B. In Sections C,D&E,most items contain an initial question that must be answered either"Yes"or"No". If the answer to the initial question is"Yes",complete the sub-questions that follow. If the answer to the initial question is"No",proceed to the next question. Section F allows the project sponsor to identify and attach any additional information. Section G requires the name and signature of the project sponsor to verify that the information contained in Part lis accurate and complete. A.Project and Sponsor Information. Name of Action or Project: Rye Ridge Park Project Location(describe,and attach a general location map): Bowman Ave.,west of South Ridge St.immediately west of Rye Ridge Plaza and across the street from Port Chester Middle School(see attached map) Brief Description of Proposed Action(include purpose or need): Amended Site Plan Approval to construct a Village passive park which includes a dog park,additional parking spaces,walkways with benches,an emergency boat launch area,fencing along the Blind Brook and the addition of landscaping/screening. Site Plan Application Addendum: 1.A waiver of condition 5.x as set forth in the resolution adopted on January 28,2014 by the Board of Trustees of the Village of Rye Brook. 2.A waiver by the Village of Rye Brook that the current owner is under any obligation to remediate the existing environmental contamination of the Real Property and a finding that the new owner need only comply with such conditions as have been previously established by the New York State DEC. 3.Modification of the terms and conditions of Declaration of Restrictive Covenant and the Agreement between Village of Rye Brook and K&M Realty Group,LTD.,dated May 1994,prohibiting parking lots as principal uses on"The Strip". Name of Applicant/Sponsor: Telephone:(914)468-7300 Rye Ridge Park LLC E-Mail:jkallman@winprop.com Address:10 Rye Ridge Plaza,Suite 200 City/PO:Village of Rye Brook State:New York Zip Code:10573 Project Contact(if not same as sponsor;give name and title/role): Telephone:same as applicant Jonathan Kallman,Manager E-Mail: same as applicant Address: same as applicant City/PO: State: Zip Code: Property Owner (if not same as sponsor): Telephone: (914)318-2351 K&M Realty Group,LTD E-Mail: kipkonigsberg@aol.com Address: 1411 Purchase Street City/PO: Purchase State: New York Zip Code:10577 Page 1 of 13 B.Government Approvals B.Government Approvals,Funding,or Sponsorship. ("Funding"includes grants,loans,tax relief,and any other forms of financial assistance.) Government Entity If Yes:Identify Agency and Approval(s) Application Date Required (Actual or projected) a.City Council,Town Board, ®Yes❑No Board of Trustees:Amended Site Plan Approval TBD or Village Board of Trustees b.City,Town or Village ®Yes❑No Planning Bd:Amended Site Plan recommendation TBD Planning Board or Commission Renewal of Wetlands&Steep Slopes c.City Council,Town or ❑Yes®No Village Zoning Board of Appeals d.Other local agencies ®Yes❑No Building Dept.:Site Development Permit TBD e.County agencies ®Yes❑No Westchester Co.Planning Board TBD f.Regional agencies ❑Yes®No g.State agencies ❑Yes®No h.Federal agencies ❑Yes®No i. Coastal Resources. i. Is the project site within a Coastal Area,or the waterfront area of a Designated Inland Waterway? ❑Yes Oio ii. Is the project site located in a community with an approved Local Waterfront Revitalization Program? ❑YesONo iff. Is the project site within a Coastal Erosion Hazard Area? ❑YesONo C.Planning and Zoning C.I.Planning and zoning actions. Will administrative or legislative adoption,or amendment of a plan,local law,ordinance,rule or regulation be the ❑YesONo only approval(s)which must be granted to enable the proposed action to proceed? • If Yes,complete sections C,F and G. • If No,proceed to question C.2 and complete all remaining sections and questions in Part 1 C.2.Adopted land use plans. a.Do any municipally-adopted (city,town,village or county)comprehensive land use plan(s)include the site ❑Yes®No where the proposed action would be located? If Yes,does the comprehensive plan include specific recommendations for the site where the proposed action ❑Yes❑No would be located? b.Is the site of the proposed action within any local or regional special planning district(for example: Greenway mYes❑No Brownfield Opportunity Area(BOA);designated State or Federal heritage area;watershed management plan; or other?) If Yes,identify the plan(s): Scenic Roads Overlay District(SROD) c. Is the proposed action located wholly or partially within an area listed in an adopted municipal open space plan, ❑YesONo or an adopted municipal farmland protection plan? If Yes,identify the plan(s): Page 2 of 13 C.3. Zoning a. Is the site of the proposed action located in a municipality with an adopted zoning law or ordinance. ®YesONo If Yes,what is the zoning classification(s)including any applicable overlay district? C1-P Planned Neighborhood Retail Distdc•"and the crena^Rnads Overlay Dictrict b. Is the use permitted or allowed by a special or conditional use permit? ®Yes[]No C.Is a zoning change requested as part of the proposed action? ❑Yes®No If Yes, L What is the proposed new zoning for the site? CA.Existing community services. a.In what school district is the project site located?Port Chester Rye b.What police or other public protection forces serve the project site? Ry c.Which fire protection and emergency medical services serve the project site? Port Chester FD&Port Chester/Rye/Rve Brook EMS - d.What parks serve the project site? No D.Project Details D.I.Proposed and Potential Development a.What is the general nature of the proposed action(e.g.,residential,industrial,commercial,recreational;if mixed,include all components)? Recreational:Passive Village Park to include sitting area and Dog Park b.a.Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? 2.12 acres "Strip"=2.12 ac. b.Total acreage to be physically disturbed? 1.31 acres Win Property=15.15 ac. c.Total acreage(project site and any contiguous properties)owned K&M Realty=1.92 ac. or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? 19.19• acres C.Is the proposed action an expansion of an existing project or use? ❑Yes®No L If Yes,what is the approximate percentage of the proposed expansion and identify the units(e.g.,acres,miles,housing units, square feet)? % Units: d.Is the proposed action a subdivision,or does it include a subdivision? ®Yes 0No If Yes, L Purpose or type of subdivision?(e.g.,residential,industrial,commercial;if mixed,specify types) To create Village Park Land ii.Is a cluster/conservation layout proposed? DYes Olo iii.Number of lots proposed? iv.Minimum and maximum proposed lot sizes? Minimum Maximum e.Will proposed action be constructed in multiple phases? ❑Yes®No i. If No,anticipated period of construction: 8 months ii. If Yes: • Total number of phases anticipated • Anticipated commencement date of phase 1 (including demolition) month year • Anticipated completion date of final phase month _year • Generally describe connections or relationships among phases,including any contingencies where progress of one phase may determine timing or duration of future phases: Page 3 of 13 f.Does the project include new residential uses? ❑Yes®No If Yes,show numbers of units proposed. One Family Two Family Three Family Multiple Familyf�our or more Initial Phase At completion of all phases g.Does the proposed action include new non-residential construction(including expansions)? ❑YesONo If Yes, L Total number of structures ii. Dimensions(in feet)of largest proposed structure: height; width. and length iii.Approximate extent of building space to be heated or cooled: square feet h.Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that will result in the impoundment of any ❑YesONo liquids,such as creation of a water supply,reservoir,pond,lake,waste lagoon or other storage? If Yes, L Purpose of the impoundment: ii. If a water impoundment,the principal source of the water: ❑Ground water❑Surface water streams[]Other specify: iii. If other than water,identify the type of impounded/contained liquids and their source. iv. Approximate size of the proposed impoundment. Volume: million gallons;surface area: acres v. Dimensions of the proposed dam or impounding structure: height; length vi. Construction method/materials for the proposed dam or impounding structure(e.g.,earth fill,rock,wood,concrete): D.2. Project Operations a.Does the proposed action include any excavation,mining,or dredging,during construction,operations,or both? R]Yes❑No (Not including general site preparation,grading or installation of utilities or foundations where all excavated materials will remain onsite) If Yes: i.What is the purpose of the excavation or dredging?To bring groiect components to designed elevations ii. How much material(including rock,earth,sediments,etc.)is proposed to be removed from the site? • Volume(specify tons or cubic yards): approx.480 CY • Over what duration of time? Over the length of construction.approx.8 months iii.Describe nature and characteristics of materials to be excavated or dredged,and plans to use,manage or dispose of them. The area to be excavated consists of existing fill areas as well as areas adwacent to the shore line of the act Branch of the Blind Brook&the Blind Brook Lower Pond. iv. Will there be onsite dewatering or processing of excavated materials? ❑YesRJNo If yes,describe. v.What is the total area to be dredged or excavated? 1.31 acres vi. What is the maximum area to be worked at any one time? 1 acres vii. What would be the maximum depth of excavation or dredging? s feet viii. Will the excavation require blasting? ❑YesRJNo ix. Summarize site reclamation goals and plan: b.Would the proposed action cause or result in alteration of,increase or decrease in size of,or encroachment R]Yes❑No into any existing wetland,waterbody,shoreline,beach or adjacent area? If Yes: i.Identify the wetland or waterbody which would be affected(by name,water index number,wetland map number or geographic description):Fahanre the shore line of the Fact Rranrh of the Mind Brook arross the prro.'ert area Page 4 of 13 H. Describe how the proposed action would affect that waterbody or wetland,e.g.excavation,fill,placement of structures,or alteration of channels,banks and shorelines. Indicate extent of activities,alterations and additions in square feet or acres: Project entails the construction of s` illVillRup Passive Park nn anprnx 1 Rlnr The nark will include n ring nark arpa aririitionalap rking spaces walkways with benches a emergency boat launch area fencing along the Blind Brook and enhancement of landscaping/screening. iii. Will proposed action cause or result in disturbance to bottom sediments? ❑YesZNo If Yes,describe: iv. Will proposed action cause or result in the destruction or removal of aquatic vegetation? ❑Yes®No If Yes: • acres of aquatic vegetation proposed to be removed: • expected acreage of aquatic vegetation remaining after project completion: • purpose of proposed removal(e.g.beach clearing,invasive species control,boat access): • proposed method of plant removal: • if chemical/herbicide treatment will be used,specify product(s): v. Describe any proposed reclamation/mitigation following disturbance: All areas of disturbance will be brought back to pre-existing conditions and enhanced with native appropriate plantings, c.Will the proposed action use,or create a new demand for water? ®Yes Flo If Yes: i.Total anticipated water usage/demand per day: 15.gallons/day H. Will the proposed action obtain water from an existing public water supply? ®Yes❑No If Yes: • Name of district or service area: SUEZ Water New York Inc. • Does the existing public water supply have capacity to serve the proposal? ®Yes❑No • Is the project site in the existing district? ®Yes[:]No • Is expansion of the district needed? ❑YesRlNo • Do existing lines serve the project site? ®Yes❑No iii. Will line extension within an existing district be necessary to supply the project? ❑Yes olo If Yes: • Describe extensions or capacity expansions proposed to serve this project: Project would require an approx.2"service for use as a drinking water fountain for Park use and the dog park and for a possible water feature. • Source(s)of supply for the district: C"=Z Water New York Inc iv.Is a new water supply district or service area proposed to be formed to serve the project site? ❑ Yes©No If,Yes: • Applicant/sponsor for new district: • Date application submitted or anticipated: • Proposed source(s)of supply for new district: v. If a public water supply will not be used,describe plans to provide water supply for the project: N/A vi.If water supply will be from wells(public or private),maximum pumping capacity: N/A gallons/minute. d.Will the proposed action generate liquid wastes? ❑Yes®No If Yes: L Total anticipated liquid waste generation per day: gallons/day ii.Nature of liquid wastes to be generated(e.g.,sanitary wastewater,industrial;if combination,describe all components and approximate volumes or proportions of each): iii. Will the proposed action use any existing public wastewater treatment facilities? ❑Yes®No If Yes: • Name of wastewater treatment plant to be used: • Name of district: • Does the existing wastewater treatment plant have capacity to serve the project? ❑Yes❑No • Is the project site in the existing district? ❑Yes❑No • Is expansion of the district needed? ❑Yes❑No Page 5 of 13 • Do existing sewer lines serve the project site? ❑YesONo • Will line extension within an existing district be necessary to serve the project? ❑YesONo If Yes: • Describe extensions or capacity expansions proposed to serve this project: iv. Will a new wastewater(sewage)treatment district be formed to serve the project site? ❑Yes®No If Yes: • Applicant/sponsor for new district: • Date application submitted or anticipated: • What is the receiving water for the wastewater discharge? v. If public facilities will not be used,describe plans to provide wastewater treatment for the project,including specifying proposed receiving water(name and classification if surface discharge,or describe subsurface disposal plans): NO sewer syAll he nroviriad Prniect;goronosoc+as a rasciva park A Describe any plans or designs to capture,recycle or reuse liquid waste: N/A e.Will the proposed action disturb more than one acre and create stormwater runoff,either from new point ®Yes❑No sources(i.e.ditches,pipes,swales,curbs,gutters or other concentrated flows of stormwater)or non-point source(i.e.sheet flow)during construction or post construction? If Yes: i.How much impervious surface will the project create in relation to total size of project parcel? Square feet or 0.55 acres(impervious surface) Square feet or 2.12 acres(parcel size) ii.Describe types of new point sources.Surface runoff from new parking areas will be treated underground and discharged via storm pipes iii.Where will the stormwater runoff be directed(i.e.on-site stormwater management facility/structures,adjacent properties, groundwater,on-site surface water or off-site surface waters)? Stormwater runoff will be directed to an underground infiltration syctem then discharge into the Blind Brook. • If to surface waters,identify receiving water bodies or wetlands: East Branch of the Blind Brook • Will stormwater runoff flow to adjacent properties? ❑Yes®No iv. Does proposed plan minimize impervious surfaces,use pervious materials or collect and re-use stormwater? ®Yes❑No f. Does the proposed action include,or will it use on-site,one or more sources of air emissions,including fuel ❑Yes®No combustion,waste incineration,or other processes or operations? If Yes,identify: i.Mobile sources during project operations(e.g.,heavy equipment,fleet or delivery vehicles) ii. Stationary sources during construction(e.g.,power generation,structural heating,batch plant,crushers) iii. Stationary sources during operations(e.g.,process emissions,large boilers,electric generation) g.Will any air emission sources named in D.2.f(above),require a NY State Air Registration,Air Facility Permit, ❑Yes BNo or Federal Clean Air Act Title IV or Title V Permit? If Yes: L Is the project site located in an Air quality non-attainment area? (Area routinely or periodically fails to meet ❑Yes❑No ambient air quality standards for all or some parts of the year) ii.In addition to emissions as calculated in the application,the project will generate: • Tons/year(short tons)of Carbon Dioxide(CO2) • Tonslyear(short tons)of Nitrous Oxide(N20) • Tons/year(short tons)of Perfluorocarbons(PFCs) • Tons/year(short tons)of Sulfur Hexafluoride(SF6) • Tons/year(short tons)of Carbon Dioxide equivalent of Hydroflourocarbons(HFCs) • Tons/year(short tons)of Hazardous Air Pollutants(HAPS) Page 6 of 13 h.Will the proposed action generate or emit methane(including,but not limited to,sewage treatment plants, ❑YesONo landfills,composting facilities)? If Yes: i. Estimate methane generation in tons/year(metric): ii.Describe any methane capture,control or elimination measures included in project design(e.g.,combustion to generate heat or electricity,flaring): i.Will the proposed action result in the release of air pollutants from open-air operations or processes,such as ❑YesONo quarry or landfill operations? If Yes:Describe operations and nature of emissions(e.g.,diesel exhaust,rock particulates/dust): j.Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels or generate substantial ❑YesONo new demand for transportation facilities or services? If Yes: L When is the peak traffic expected(Check all that apply): ❑Morning ❑Evening []Weekend ❑Randomly between hours of to _- ii.For commercial activities only,projected number of semi-trailer truck trips/day: iii.Parking spaces: Existing Proposed Net increase/decrease iv.Does the proposed action include any shared use parking? EYes❑No v. If the proposed action includes any modification of existing roads,creation of new roads or change in existing access,describe: Project users of the Village Park vi. Are public/private transportation service(s)or facilities available within''/2 mile of the proposed site? E]Yes❑No vii Will the proposed action include access to public transportation or accommodations for use of hybrid,electric ❑YesONo or other alternative fueled vehicles? viii.Will the proposed action include plans for pedestrian or bicycle accommodations for connections to existing ❑YesONo pedestrian or bicycle routes? k.Will the proposed action(for commercial or industrial projects only)generate new or additional demand OYes❑No for energy? If Yes: L Estimate annual electricity demand during operation of the proposed action: A electric line is to be brought into nark There is no anticioated use for electric at this time but Village wants service ii. Anticipated sources/suppliers of electricity for the project(e.g.,on-site combustion,on-site renewable,via grid/local utility,or other): Edi Consolidated JVison Electric Company iii. Will the proposed action require a new,or an upgrade to,an existing substation? ❑YesONo 1.Hours of operation. Answer all items which apply. L During Construction: ii. During Operations: • Monday-Friday: 8:OOam to 6:00 pm a Monday-Friday: Dusk to Dawn • Saturday: 9:OOam to 4:OOpm • Saturday: Dusk to Dawn • Sunday: No Work • Sunday: Dusk to Dawn • Holidays: No Work • Holidays: Dusk to Dawn Page 7 of 13 m.Will the proposed action produce noise that will exceed existing ambient noise levels during construction, ❑Yes ONo operation,or both? If yes: L Provide details including sources,time of day and duration: ii. Will proposed action remove existing natural barriers that could act as a noise barrier or screen? ❑Yes ONo Describe: n..Will the proposed action have outdoor lighting? OYes❑No If yes: L Describe source(s),location(s),height of fixture(s),direction/aim,and proximity to nearest occupied structures: Proposed Ilghting will be added at the expanded parking 2rea for safety. Lights will be consistent with existing lights within the Rye Ridge Plaza site. All lights will provide for house side shields to aim lighting away from park land. ii. Will proposed action remove existing natural barriers that could act as a light barrier or screen? ®Yes[]No Describe:Fxistingyagetntion will ha remnved to implement new park area and new landsraping/screening will hp provided thmiighrnit pminnt area o. Does the proposed action have the potential to produce odors for more than one hour per day? ❑Yes ONo If Yes,describe possible sources,potential frequency and duration of odor emissions,and proximity to nearest occupied structures: p.Will the proposed action include any bulk storage of petroleum(combined capacity of over 1,100 gallons) ❑Yes ONo or chemical products 185 gallons in above ground storage or any amount in underground storage? If Yes: L Product(s)to be stored ii.Volume(s) per unit time (e.g.,month,year) iii. Generally describe proposed storage facilities: q.Will the proposed action(commercial,industrial and recreational projects only)use pesticides(i.e.,herbicides, O Yes []No insecticides)during construction or operation? If Yes: i.Describe proposed treatment(s): Normal plant fertffili7prs and pesticides commonly used in narks. The Village of Rye Brook will provide the maintenance at the park once it has been constructed. ii.Will the proposed action use Integrated Pest Management Practices? O Yes ❑No r.Will the proposed action(commercial or industrial projects only)involve or require the management or disposal ❑ Yes ONo of solid waste(excluding hazardous materials)? If Yes: L Describe any solid waste(s)to be generated during construction or operation of the facility: • Construction: tons per (unit of time) • Operation: tons per (unit of time) ii.Describe any proposals for on-site minimization,recycling or reuse of materials to avoid disposal as solid waste: • Construction: • Operation: iii.Proposed disposal methods/facilities for solid waste generated on-site: • Construction: • Operation: Page 8 of 13 s.Does the proposed action include construction or modification of a solid waste management facility? ❑ Yes 0 No If Yes: i. Type of management or handling of waste proposed for the site(e.g.,recycling or transfer station,composting,landfill,or other disposal activities): H. Anticipated rate of disposal/processing: Tons/month,if transfer or other non-combustion/thermal treatment,or Tons/hour,if combustion or thermal treatment iii. If landfill,anticipated site life: years t.Will proposed action at the site involve the commercial generation,treatment,storage,or disposal of hazardous ❑YesONo waste? If Yes: i.Name(s)of all hazardous wastes or constituents to be generated,handled or managed at facility: ii. Generally describe processes or activities involving hazardous wastes or constituents: iii. Specify amount to be handled or generated tons/month iv. Describe any proposals for on-site minimization,recycling or reuse of hazardous constituents: v.Will any hazardous wastes be disposed at an existing offsite hazardous waste facility? ❑YesONo If Yes:provide name and location of facility: If No:describe proposed management of any hazardous wastes which will not be sent to a hazardous waste facility: E.Site and Setting of Proposed Action E.I.Land uses on and surrounding the project site a.Existing land uses. i. Check all uses that occur on,adjoining and near the project site. ❑ Urban ❑ Industrial ® Commercial 0 Residential(suburban) ❑Rural(non-farm) ❑ Forest ❑ Agriculture ❑ Aquatic 0 Other(specify):Middle School ii. If mix of uses,generally describe: port rhestpr Middl S hnnl Pxosts grrosq Bowman Ave to the north Rye Ridge Shopping Qpnter is adjacent to thp Past multifamily residential units ar- adjacent to the west and Cross Westchester Expressway(1-287)to the south. b.Land uses and covertypes on the project site. Land use or Current Acreage After Change Covertype Acreage Project Completion (Acres+/-) • Roads,buildings,and other paved or impervious 27 .80 +.53 surfaces • Forested .83 .40 -.43 • Meadows,grasslands or brushlands(non- agricultural,including abandoned agricultural) 50 64 +.14 • Agricultural - - - (includes active orchards,field,greenhouse etc.) • Surface water features .79 .79 - (lakes,ponds,streams,rivers,etc.) • Wetlands(freshwater or tidal) - - - • Non-vegetated(bare rock,earth or fill) .24 0 -.24 • Other Describe: * Area within limits of disturbance page 9 of 13 c.Is the project site presently used by members of the community for public recreation? ❑YesONo i. If Yes: explain: d.Are there any facilities serving children,the elderly,people with disabilities(e.g.,schools,hospitals,licensed ®Yes❑No day care centers,or group homes)within 1500 feet of the project site? If Yes, i. Identify Facilities: Port Chester Middle School e.Does the project site contain an existing dam? ❑Yes®No If Yes: i.Dimensions of the dam and impoundment: • Dam height: feet • Dam length: feet • Surface area: acres • Volume impounded: gallons OR acre-feet ii. Dam's existing hazard classification: W. Provide date and summarize results of last inspection: f.Has the project site ever been used as a municipal,commercial or industrial solid waste management facility, ❑YesONo or does the project site adjoin property which is now,or was at one time,used as a solid waste management facility? If Yes: L Has the facility been formally closed? ❑Yes❑ No • If yes,cite sources/documentation: ii.Describe the location of the project site relative to the boundaries of the solid waste management facility: W.Describe any development constraints due to the prior solid waste activities: g.Have hazardous wastes been generated,treated and/or disposed of at the site,or does the project site adjoin ❑Yes®No property which is now or was at one time used to commercially treat,store and/or dispose of hazardous waste? If Yes: L Describe waste(s)handled and waste management activities,including approximate time when activities occurred: h. Potential contamination history. Has there been a reported spill at the proposed project site,or have any ®Yes❑No remedial actions been conducted at or adjacent to the proposed site? If Yes: L Is any portion of the site listed on the NYSDEC Spills Incidents database or Environmental Site ❑YesONo Remediation database? Check all that apply: ❑ Yes—Spills Incidents database Provide DEC ID number(s): ❑ Yes—Environmental Site Remediation database Provide DEC ID number(s): ❑ Neither database ii. If site has been subject of RCRA corrective activities,describe control measures: Soil remptlintinn of contaminated soils was performed and a"No Further Artion"latter has bean obtained from the NYSDEC W. Is the project within 2000 feet of any site in the NYSDEC Environmental Site Remediation database? ❑Yes0No If yes,provide DEC ID number(s): iv.If yes to(i),(ii)or(iii)above,describe current status of site(s): Page 10 of 13 v. Is the project site subject to an institutional control limiting property uses? ❑Yes®No • If yes,DEC site ID number: • Describe the type of institutional control(e.g.,deed restriction or easement): • Describe any use limitations: • Describe any engineering controls: • Will the project affect the institutional or engineering controls in place? ❑YesONo • Explain: E.2. Natural Resources On or Near Project Site a.What is the average depth to bedrock on the project site? >5 feet b.Are there bedrock outcroppings on the project site? ❑YesONo If Yes,what proportion of the site is comprised of bedrock outcroppings? % C.Predominant soil type(s)present on project site: Uc:Udorthents,wet substratum 45% UpB:Urban Land-Paxton complex 20% W:Water 35% d.What is the average depth to the water table on the project site? Average: 1.25'to 6.5' feet e.Drainage status of project site soils:❑ Well Drained: %of site ❑ Moderately Well Drained: %of site 0 Poorly Drained 100%of site f.Approximate proportion of proposed action site with slopes: 210-10%: 50 %of site 0 10-15%: 35 %of site 0 15%or greater: 15 %of site g.Are there any unique geologic features on the project site? ❑YesONo If Yes,describe: h.Surface water features. i.Does any portion of the project site contain wetlands or other waterbodies(including streams,rivers, OYes❑No ponds or lakes)? H. Do any wetlands or other waterbodies adjoin the project site? OYes❑No If Yes to either i or ii,continue. If No,skip to E.21 iii. Are any of the wetlands or waterbodies within or adjoining the project site regulated by any federal, R]Yes❑No state or local agency? iv. For each identified regulated wetland and waterbody on the project site,provide the following information: • Streams: Name 935-94 Classification SC • Lakes or Ponds: Name Classification • Wetlands: Name Federal Waters,Federal Waters,Federal Waters,... Approximate Size • Wetland No.(if regulated by DEC) v. Are any of the above water bodies listed in the most recent compilation of NYS water quality-impaired 21 Yes❑No waterbodies? If yes,name of impaired water body/bodies and basis for listing as impaired: Name-Pollutants-Uses:Blind Brook,Upper,and tribs—Silt/Sediment—Aquatic Life i.Is the project site in a designated Floodway? OYes❑No j.Is the project site in the 100 year Floodplain? OYes[:]No k.Is the project site in the 500 year Floodplain? OYes❑No 1.Is the project site located over,or immediately adjoining,a primary,principal or sole source aquifer? OYes❑No If Yes: i.Name of aquifer:Principal Aquifer Page 11 of 13 m. Identify the predominant wildlife species that occupy or use the project site: n.Does the project site contain a designated significant natural community? ❑YesOlo If Yes: i.Describe the habitat/community(composition,function,and basis for designation): ii. Source(s)of description or evaluation: W.Extent of community/habitat: • Currently: acres • Following completion of project as proposed: acres • Gain or loss(indicate+or-): acres o.Does project site contain any species of plant or animal that is listed by the federal government or NYS as ❑Yes®No endangered or threatened,or does it contain any areas identified as habitat for an endangered or threatened species? p. Does the project site contain any species of plant or animal that is listed by NYS as rare,or as a species of E1Yes0No special concern? q.Is the project site or adjoining area currently used for hunting,trapping,fishing or shell fishing? ❑Yes®No If yes,give a brief description of how the proposed action may affect that use: E.3. Designated Public Resources On or Near Project Site a.Is the project site,or any portion of it,located in a designated agricultural district certified pursuant to ❑Yes✓❑No Agriculture and Markets Law,Article 25-AA,Section 303 and 304? If Yes, provide county plus district name/number: b.Are agricultural lands consisting of highly productive soils present? ❑YesRJNo i. If Yes:acreage(s)on project site? H. Source(s)of soil rating(s): c. Does the project site contain all or part of,or is it substantially contiguous to,a registered National ❑YesONo Natural Landmark? If Yes: i. Nature of the natural landmark: ❑Biological Community ❑ Geological Feature ii.Provide brief description of landmark,including values behind designation and approximate size/extent: d.Is the project site located in or does it adjoin a state listed Critical Environmental Area? ❑Yes©No If Yes: i. CEA name: ii.Basis for designation: W.Designating agency and date: Page 12 of 13 e.Does the project site contain,or is it substantially contiguous to,a building,archaeological site,or district ❑YesO No which is listed on,or has been nominated by the NYS Board of Historic Preservation for inclusion on,the State or National Register of Historic Places? If Yes: L Nature of historic/archaeological resource: El Archaeological Site ❑Historic Building or District ii.Name: iii.Brief description of attributes on which listing is based: f.Is the project site,or any portion of it,located in or adjacent to an area designated as sensitive for ❑YesONo archaeological sites on the NY State Historic Preservation Office(SHPO)archaeological site inventory? g.Have additional archaeological or historic site(s)or resources been identified on the project site? ❑YesONo If Yes: i.Describe possible resource(s): ii. Basis for identification: h.Is the project site within fives miles of any officially designated and publicly accessible federal,state,or local ❑Yes®No scenic or aesthetic resource? If Yes: i.Identify resource: ii.Nature of,or basis for,designation(e.g.,established highway overlook,state or local park,state historic trail or scenic byway, etc.): iii. Distance between project and resource: miles. i. Is the project site located within a designated river corridor under the Wild,Scenic and Recreational Rivers ❑Yes0No Program 6 NYCRR 666? If Yes: L Identify the name of the river and its designation: ii.Is the activity consistent with development restrictions contained in 6NYCRR Part 666? ❑Yes❑No F.Additional Information Attach any additional information which may be needed to clarify your project. If you have identified any adverse impacts which could be associated with your proposal,please describe those impacts plus any measures which you propose to avoid or minimize them. G. Verification I certify that the information provided is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor ame Anthony P Nester Date March 16.2016 Signature Title Associate Principal PRINT FORM Page 13 of 13 EAF Mapper Summary Report Monday, March 14,2016 3:00 PM Disclaimer: The EAF Mapper is a screening tool intended to assist B r o ok`F:1'4I:27.1.10 project sponsors and reviewing agencies in preparing an environmental 135.32-1'' 1 I +, yy assessment form(EAF).Not all questions asked in the EAF are 1-,.1.27-1 14i',2?-j-11, answered by the EAF Mapper.Additional information on any EAF 135.3 2 1-1 t - question can be obtained by consulting the EAF Workbooks. Although 141.27-1 Is1't ,21-1-1v t the EAF Mapper provides the most up-to-date digital data available to DEC,you y-'.1!2 6=1=3 �-^"�.O!►! a� to obtain datanot so need to contact local p t provided by the Mapper.Digital data sourcesr other data in order snot a - --�—1-11 ' r=1 2 1 - ' - 741.2 1-2substitute for agency determinations. 141.27 1?8 11.27 1 25 �}• L��Ko(taHa Montreal Rye n - V. 7 ;141. =9.2 7=1-7 14'1.27 1 5 'u 0- 0545 -6 �\14-1.27-1-3 '1412 7;1__1 . 1=1 1 Roc a cter� jl�K'YJRK' ti, bConhud 1';1135-2-1 �.._..;-' , , - 4; 941.35 2-3fiti, Ip.Q'etroit Botb� AI 7rr� ' Boston J , X1,35-1--15:141..5-1=33' FTrr,idrnco -�� ---Harrison : ' .- t 141-35-i-1'8= y c z xn ---�--j -�`1�41.a35-1-4�' 1-= 141.35- 3 __ »� C_( V -c, Esri, 2)-1 184 i i.s� 1 r ,, :Interna r.mcuhF{ -f•.j:tTi Pi 'i- _ r c rI.-W! z= - 1 ,r•1_ I, �f tri tgrt' E=n k qtr Pittsburgh H 'T'rIr,-�rr1`e'- 05 45--8005..5.=l8 alartf,lul m�fln ra�r,•b� � ?h{ = mbua RT*i rHina n?i T ap,fJ�G1J, 8R54�,r'0545,-76 iu1 ttra �.;c�i k 9-U Ar Go SiiA'i -2 Wachin for 'Esrt.zri,IAA-.E ri China •i tG_. _-t t !-=i r-- ..,is r _ J.-._..Y r-.. B.i.i [Coastal or Waterfront Area] No B.i.ii [Local Waterfront Revitalization Area] No C.2.b. [Special Planning District] Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. E.1.h [DEC Spills or Remediation Site- Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Potential Contamination History] Workbook. E.1.h.i[DEC Spills or Remediation Site- Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Listed] Workbook. E.1.h.i [DEC Spills or Remediation Site- Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete.Refer to EAF Environmental Site Remediation Database] Workbook. E.1.h.iii[Within 2,000'of DEC Remediation No Site] E.2.g [Unique Geologic Features] No E.2.h.i [Surface Water Features] Yes E.2.h.ii [Surface Water Features] Yes E.2.h.iii[Surface Water Features] Yes- Digital mapping information on local and federal wetlands and waterbodies is known to be incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. E.2.h.iv[Surface Water Features-Stream 935-94 Name] E.2.h.iv[Surface Water Features-Stream SC Classification] E.2.h.iv[Surface Water Features-Wetlands Federal Waters Name] E.2.h.v[Impaired Water Bodies] Yes E.2.h.v[Impaired Water Bodies-Name and Name-Pollutants-Uses:Blind Brook, Upper,and tribs—Silt/Sediment— Basis for Listing] Aquatic Life E.2.i. [Floodway] Yes Full Environmental Assessment Form - EAF Mapper Summary Report f E.2.j. [100 Year Floodplain] Yes E.2.k. [500 Year Floodplain] Yes E.2.1. [Aquifers] Yes E.2.1. [Aquifer Names] Principal Aquifer E.2.n. [Natural Communities] No E.2.o. [Endangered or Threatened Species] No E.2.p. [Rare Plants or Animals] No E.3.a. [Agricultural District] No E.3.c. [National Natural Landmark] No E.3.d [Critical Environmental Area] No E.3.e. [National Register of Historic Places] Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook. E.M. [Archeological Sites] No E.3.i. [Designated River Corridor] No Full Environmental Assessment Form- EAF Mapper Summary Report BOWMAN AVENUE DEVELOPMENT— AMENDED SUBDIVISION AND SITE PLANS VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK,NEW YORK LEAD AGENCY SELECTION REPLY FORM The �� �Il��o �( ��p tr-��1� fel 5�,n �n �0 9�—p (specify agency) examined the Lead Agency notification form and the accompanying documentation for amended subdivision and site plans that modify the development plan for a proposed municipal park located on the south side of Bowman Avenue west of the Rye Ridge Shopping Center, and: (Check A or B) XA. Does not want to be the Lead Agency for this action. ❑ B. Wants to be the Lead Agency for this action. Additional comments or concerns(attach additional pages if necessary): Reviewed by: A'C i 7 60d o's, Signature Name CA viol 4w j1p 12,1� Title Date WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE MAILING DATE OF THE NOTIFICATION, PLEASE RETURN THIS FORM TO: Christopher Bradbury, Village Administrator Village of Rye Brook 938 King Street Rye Brook, New York 10573 Phone: (914) 939-1121 FAX: (914) 939-0242 1 ijesler Referral Review vCorTl Pursuant to Section 239 L,M and N of the General Municipal Law and Section 277.61 of the County Administrative Code Robert P.Astorino County Executive County Planning Board April 11, 2016 Christopher Bradbury, Village Administrator Rye Brook Village Hall 938 King Street Rye Brook, NY 10573-1226 Subject: Referral File No. RYB 16-003—Rye Ridge Park Site Plan Amendment; Lead Agency Dear Mr. Bradbury: The Westchester County Planning Board has received a notice of intent to be Lead Agency, pursuant to the NYS Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQR) for the above referenced site plan amendment application to modify the design of a passive park for the Village of Rye Brook which is associated with the previously approved Bowman Avenue residential development. The park is now proposed to include a dog run, walkways, benches and emergency boat launch area and parking for the Rye Ridge Plaza. We have no objection to the Rye Brook Board of Trustees assuming Lead Agency status for this review. While we respectfully request that we be sent additional materials concerning this application as it moves through the review process. We offer the following initial comment under the provisions of Section 239 L, M and N of the General Municipal Law and Section 277.61 of the County Administrative Code: County stream control mrmit. The site abuts Blind Brook, which is designated a County stream channel in this location. The Westchester County Department of Public Works and Transportation (WC DPWT) must be listed as an involved Agency under SEQR because a County Stream Control Permit is required. The applicant must contact WC DPWT for this review. A Stream Control Permit application is attached. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this matter. Respectfully, WESTCHESTER COUNTY PLANNING BOARD Edward Buroughs, AICP Commissioner EEB.'LH cc: Jeffrey A. Dean, Senior Engineer(Civil),County Department of Public Works and Transportation 432 Michaehan Office Building 148 Martine:Avenue White Plains, New York 10601 Telephone: (914)995-.1400 Website! westchestergov.com Permit No. Stream COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND TRANSPORTATION 148 MARTINE AVENUE WHITE PLAINS,NEW YORK 10601 APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO DO WORK WITHIN CHANNEL LINES OR WITHIN 100 FEET THEREFROM (To Be Executed in Triplicate) TO: Jay T.Pisco,P.E. Commissioner,Public Works and Transportation Application is hereby made for a permit,under Chapter 241,Article III of the Westchester County Administrative Code,to carry out the following described project within channel lines or within 100 feet therefrom. 1. Applicant (Owner or Agent) 2. Address (Business or Residence) Zip Code Telephone 3. Owner Deed recorded in Liber Page 4. Tax Lot(s) Tax Block(s) Sheet No.(s) 5. Name and Location of Stream (Stream) (Municipality) 6. Location of Stream feet downstream from (Highway) 7. Proposed project and extent 8. Work To Be Started To Be Completed 9. Water Elevations(F.E.M.A.Flood Insurance) 10 Yr. 100 Yr. 10. Applicant attaches herewith THREE copies of the plans showing location of work,distances to nearest highway crossings, and details of design stamped by a Professional Engineer or Registered Architect. Applicant will furnish additional data when required by the Commissioner. 11. List all approvals,certifications or permits required by Federal, State or Local Agencies: _ Westchester County Department of Public Works and Transportation Witness: (Applicant's Signature) Approval and consent to grant the permit requested by this applicant is hereby given by the duly authorized municipal representative. NOTE: Application must be signed by municipality prior to submission. Signature and Title Municipality Date THE PERMIT IS ISSUED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING TERMS,AGREEMENTS,COVENANTS AND CONDITIONS 1) The term"Commissioner"shall mean the Commissioner of Public Works and Transportation of the County of Westchester or his authorized representative. 2) The term"Permittee"shall mean the applicant obtaining the permit,or his or its duly authorized agents or representatives. 3) The Commissioner,by issuing the permit,assumes no liability or responsibility on his part or on the part of the County of Westchester of any kind or nature for this sufficiency of the design or the operations covered by the Permit. 4) The Permittee assumes all risks in the operations covered by the permit and shall be solely responsible and answerable in damages for all accidents or injuries to persons or property. 5) The Permittee shall indemnify and save harmless the County of Westchester and the Commissioner of Public Works and Transportation from any and all claims,suits,losses,damage to property or injury to persons of whatsoever kind and nature, whether direct or indirect,arising out of the Permittee's operations under the permit,and the Permittee agrees to reimburse the County of Westchester and the Commissioner of Public Works and Transportation for all expenses,costs of judgments to which they may be put arising from such operation. 6) No changes in the plans or in the nature and extent of the work shall be made without the Commissioner's written consent. The project shall be subject at all times to inspection by the Commissioner. 7) The Permittee agrees that,during the performance of the work,the Permittee will not cause or allow in any way or manner any unreasonable interference with the free flow of the stream,and that the Permittee will not place,store or dump any materials,equipment or debris in or about the stream or channel in any way which may cause interference with the free flow of water. 8) The Permittee,upon completion of the work,shall cause to be removed from within the channel lines and within 100 feet therefrom all equipment,surplus materials,debris and structures not shown on the approved plans. 9) Within 30 days after completion,the Permittee shall certify that the work has been completed in accordance with the permit and the approved plans and that all unauthorized channel obstructions have been removed. 10) Final inspection of all work authorized by the permit will be made by the Commissioner to determine that the work has been performed in compliance with the permit. 11) Completed work shall be diligently maintained by the owner of the land to prevent any danger of obstruction of the stream, water course,easement or right-of-way bounded by channel lines by reason of erosion or the collapse or other impairment of the completed work. 12) The permit shall be subject to all applicable zoning regulations of the municipality within which the land to which the permit applies is located,to Workmen's Compensation Law,Disability Benefits Law and to all other regulations thereof applying to the construction of buildings and other structures. Every building permit or certificate of occupancy issued by any municipality shall be subject to the limitations and requirements imposed by or pursuant to the Westchester County Stream Control Law,with respect to any work covered by such permit or certificate. In event of any conflict,the more restrictive provision shall prevail. 13) The Commissioner reset ves the right to revoke or cancel the permit at any time should the Permittee fail to comply with any of the terms,agreements,covenants and conditions of the permit. 14) The permit does not give any property rights,either in real property or material,or any exclusive privileges. It does not authorize any injury to public or private property,any invasion of property rights,any occupation of riparian or County property,or any infringement of State or local laws or regulations. Local and State permits and consents must be obtained when necessary. 15) The work must be completed on or before the stated completion date and shall be under the direction of a licensed professional engineer or licensed architect until it is completed. 16) The Permit is not in force and effect until the executed acceptance form is received by the Commissioner. 17) SPECIAL CONDITIONS for this Permit are set forth on the attached sheet. 18) The application,the Special conditions and the following approved plans are part of the permit: BUILDING DEIMRTMENT VIu4:E OF RYi#ROOK 938 KING 910fETRYE BRdk,NY 10573 (914)93"69 x(41'4 939-5801 vvwv v.ryAfirooLorg *********************************************************************************************************** FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: BOT Approval Date: PB Approval Date: BOT Disapproval Date: PB Disapproval Date: Attach Resolution Hereto: BOT[ ] PB[ ] ZBA[ ] Chairman: SITE PLAN FEE: DATE PAID: ENVIRONMENTAL FEE: DATE PAID: OTHER: *********************************************************************************************************** APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL Submission of this application does not assure placement on any Planning Board Agenda.The Applicant will be notified of such placement. *********************************************************************************************************** This application references but is not limited to the following sections of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook;§250 ZONING,§209 SITE PLAN REVIEW,§235 TREES, §107 DEMOLITION OF BUILDINGS,§224 SWIMMING POOLS,§121 EXCAVATION&TOPSOIL REMOVAL,§118 EROSION&SEDIMENT CONTROL,§213 STEEP SLOPES PROTECTION,§219 SUBDIVISION OF LAND, §250-40 NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS.Applicants and their Design Professionals are strongly advised to review the above mentioncd code sections online at,www.ryebrook.org prior to completing and/or submitting this application. APPLICATION FEE SCHEDULE: Residential Dwellings- $325,plus$200 per additional dwelling unit. Non-Residential Buildings - $475 plus $30 per parking space. Planned Unit Development-$575 per acre PUD Amendment- $300 Site Plan Amendment- $575 Wetlands&Watercourse- $1,150 Consultant Review(Escrow)Fee: Minimum fee$250-maximum fee$2,500,to be determined by the Village Engineer. Application fees are non-refundable.The applicant's Escrow Account must have a positive balance at all times prior to anv Consultant,Attorney,or Village review. Escrow Fees and Site Plan Fees must be paid on separate checks made payable to lire Village of Rye Brook. *********************************************************************************************************** 1. Site Address: Bowman Avenue Parcel ID#: 141.26-1-1 Zone: Cl- P 2. Property Owner: K&M Realty Group, LTD Address: 1411 Purchase St., Purchase, NY 10577 E-Mail:_kipkonigsberg .aol.com Tel.#: (914)318-2351 Other: 3. Applicant: Rye Ridge Park LLC(Jonathan Kallman) Address:10 Rve Ridgelaza,Suite200 Rye Brook,NY 10573 E-Mail: allman win�p.eom Tel.#: (914)468-7300 Other: 4. Design Professional: JMC,PLLC(James Ryan) Address: 120 Bedford Road,Amlonk,NY 10504 E-Mail: it an omcpllc.com Tel.#: (914)273-5225 Other: 5. Designate to whom correspondence is to be sent: Design Professional,Applicant&Steve Silverberg Note: If applicant is a,.Contract Vendee",please attach a copy of the contract summary with financial and confidential terms deleted REVISED 8/10/15 6. Street which property abuts: Bowman Avenue 7. Does property connect directly into State or County highway? ( )NO (x1 YES:_Bowman Avenue 8. Is site within 500 feet of Village Boundary?( )NO ()o YES If yes note all bordering municipalities: TowrWiIIage of Harrison to the south 9. Total area of site: 2.12 acres(92,347.2 s.f.) Area of site activity: 1.31 acres(57,063 s.f.) 10. Site coverage: 26%(23,962 s.f) °/o; Building coverage: N/A % 11. Existing building size: N/A New/additional building size: N/A 12. Existing parking spaces: 0 New parking spaces: X S'y 13. Nature of proposed activity: To construct a Village passive park which includes a dog park,additional parking spaces_ walkways with benches,a boat launch area,fencing along the Blind Brook and the addition of landscaping/screening. See attached addendum page. -- - — - ****************************************************************************************** Please note that this application must include the notarized signature(s)of the legal owner(s)of the above-mentioned property, in the space provided below. Any application not bearing the legal property owner's notarized signature(s)shall be deemed null and void, and will be returned to the applicant. STATE OF NEW YORK,COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER ) as: being duly sworn,deposes and states that he/she is the applicant above named, (print name of individual signing as the applicant) and further states that (s)he is the legal owner of the property to which this application pertains, or that (s)he is the for the legal owner and is duly authorized to make and file this application. (indicate architect,contactor,agent,attorney,etc.) That all statements contained herein are true to the best of his/her knowledge and belief, and that any work performed,or use conducted at the above captioned property will be in conformance with the details as set forth and contained in this application and in any accompanying approved plans and specifications,as well as in accordance with the New York State Uniform Fire Prevention &Building Code,the Code of the Village of Rye Brook and all other applicable laws,ordinances and regulations. —� l Sworn to before me this / l9 /"` Sworn to before me this day of 1(YL� , 20 day of 920 ( (0 Nota Notary P �� /K�4�►4t�✓1 atur ro Si pp scant ,tn4 Lt e-- Print Name of Property ne Print Na e of Applica y� _- V t e to Aylif*' MqA Suele Brunelll �u�t��pURelli Notary Public,State of New York Notary Public,State of New York No.01 BR6146106 No.01 BR6146106 Qualified in Westchester County Qualified in Westchester County Commission Expires May 15,201 Commission Expires May 15,201 REVISED 8/10115 Site Plan Application Addendum Page Addendum: 1. A waiver of condition 5.x as set forth in the resolution adopted on January 28, 2014 by the Board of Trustees of the Village of Rye Brook. 2. A waiver by the Village of Rye Brook that the current owner is under any obligation to remediate the existing environmental contamination of the Real Property and a finding that the new owner need only comply with such conditions as have been previously established by the New York State DEC. 3. Modification of the terms and conditions of Declaration of Restrictive Covenant and the Agreement Between Village of Rye Brook and K&M Realty Group, LTD., dated May 1994, prohibiting parking lots as principal uses on "The Strip". r 43r R(�. VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK 938 King S�reet,Rye Brook,N.Y. 10573 (914)939=0753 Fax(914)939-5801 www.ryebrook.oN SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REVIEW CHECKLIST This form shall serve as a checklist for site plan submittal and review by the Village of Rye Brook. The use of this plan review checklist by the applicant is to ensure compliance with the technical provisions of§209 of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook entitled, Site Plan Review, pertaining to preliminary and final plan preparation. The Village Code is available on the Village Website at: www.iyebrook.org. Prior to the appearance before ANY meeting or hearing of the Planning Board, the applicant must comply with all Notification Requirements of Code Section 250-40. SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL SHALL INCLUDE: 1. APPLICATIONS. Completed and signed including correspondences. 2. CHECKLIST. Completed and signed. 3. PLANS. Signed, Sealed& Dated. Fifteen paper(15) copies or twenty (20) copies when Board of Trustees approval is required and one (1) electronic version. One (1) record set with original signatures, dates and seals may be provided and submitted with fourteen (14) copies or nineteen (19) copies that clearly indicate the signatures, dates, and seals shown on the record set. 4. FEES: All application fees and Environmental fee. A separate check for filing fee and Environmental fee. 5. Environmental Assessment Form. Form available on the NYS DEC website. 6. Electronic Copy. Complete copy of all plans and shall be submitted electronically at time of submission. 7. Notarized Affidavit of Sign Posting& Mail Notification. I, Jonathan Kallman,(Manager) (Applicant's signature) have read the Notification Requirements of Code Section 250-40 and will provide notification as required. IDENTIFICATION OF APPLICANT(S): Identification of Applicant: Rye Ridge Part(LLC Applicant: Jonathan Kallman Address: 10 Rye Ridge Plaza,Suite 200,Village of Rye Brook,NY 10573 Tel. #: (914)468-7300 Fax: E-Mail: ikallman@winprop.eom Project Name: Rye Ridge Park Project Address: Bowman Avenue Current Property Owner: K&M Realty Group,LTD. Address: 1411 Purchase St.,Purchase,NY 10577 Tel. #: (914)318-2351 Fax: E-Mail: kipkonigsberg@aol.com IDENTIFICATION OF PROPERTY: Identifying Title: 'The Step"as part of the Bowman Avenue Development Tax Designation: Section: 141.26 Block: 1 Lot: 1 Zoning District: CI-P Street which property abuts: Bowman Avenue Plan Submission Date: March 16,2016 Site Plan Checklist Page 1 of 7 Project Address Bowman Avenue Y N NA PLAN REQUIREMENTS 0( O O 15-20 copies of plans prepared and signed by a registered Land Surveyor,Engineer or Architect. O O One(1)electronic copy of all submitted plans. R O O Topographic Survey stamped by New York State Land Surveyor with license number and . 00 01 Topographic survey scale of one(1)inch per twenty(20) feet or larger. 01 O O Section, block and lot numbers of the property taken from the latest tax records along with a copy of the most recent property card on file with the Town of Rye Tax Assessor's office. 01 O O Name of the proposed subdivision plan. 00 O Name and address of the owner of record. 00 O Narne and address of the applicant. 00 )0 Deed reference(s). �l O O Names, addresses and signature of every Engineer, Architect, Land Surveyor or Soil Scientist whose professional seal appears on any site plan submitted to the Board. �1 O O North arrow and scale. X) O O Location map at the minimum scale of 1"equals 1,000 feet. O O Area of all lots,in square feet. O O Engineering notes on plans as stated in application packages. 00 4 Copies of all existing and proposed deed restrictions or covenants applying to the property, including, but not limited to, covenants and agreements restricting the use and establishing future ownership and maintenance responsibilities for all private roads,recreation,and open space areas. �1 00 Any prior land use approvals with respect to the subject property. X) O O Date the plans were first drafted. Any revision(s)made to any of the sheets first submitted are to be so noted in the revision block. The revision block is to be placed on the originals of the revised sheets. Additional paper copies are to be made& submitted for the Planning Board&Building Dept.to replace those sheets previously submitted. X) O O Other existing site improvements, including,but not limited to,fences,landscape or retaining walls,landscaping & screening. X0 O O Location of all buildings and structures on the premises and approximate location of all neighboring buildings or structures within 100 feet of the lot line. .� O O Fees paid to The Village of Rye Brook Building Department. O O Any revisions to plans shall be identified with a revision cloud and numbered revision triangle Y_ _N NA ABUTTING PROPERTY INFORMATION O O 6 The names and addresses of all abutting property owners within 250 ft as indicated in the Municipal records. O O Zoning and use of abutting properties noted on plans. O O Shape, size,height and location of existing buildings and driveways within one hundred(100) feet of the site. O O )0( Location and description of existing easements within one hundred(100)feet of the site. O O 6 Location of existing private or public trails within one hundred(100)feet of the site. b O O Location of existing roads, scenic roads and/or driveways within two hundred(200)feet of the site. O O )0 Location of proposed parkland.if none state nearest recreation facility O O)() Location of existing septic system leach fields within two hundred(200)feet of the site. O X) Locations,dimensions,grades and flow, direction of existing sewers, culverts,waterlines as well as other underground utilities within and adjacent to the property. Site Plan Checklist Page 2 of 7 Project Address Bowan Avenue O O The location of all existing watercourses, intermittent streams,wetland areas and springs,consistent with the definitions set forth in Chapter 245, Wetlands and Watercourses, of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook. Y N NA PROPOSED SITE PLAN INFORMATION X) O O Sufficient, acceptable information to readily determine the location, bearing, and length of every street line, lot line, and property boundary line. O O J1 Location of all building setback lines. �1 O O Topographic data at a minimum contour interval of 2'-0"increments,showing existing and proposed contours on the property and extending a minimum of 25 feet into all adjacent properties. 006 The location and characteristics of the different areas of vegetation,including the identification of all individual trees 12 or more inches in diameter at breast height("DBH"),protected trees of any size, as well as stands of trees and wooded areas, within areas of proposed disturbance, consistent with the provisions of Chapter 235, Trees, of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook. O O )0 Location and proposed development of all buffer areas,including existing vegetative cover. O O )() Location and description of any zoning district and municipal boundaries including a zoning compliance chart for the existing and proposed lots. O O )0 Shape, size,height and location of all existing and proposed buildings. O O Location and description of any existing and proposed easements. O O Location and dimensions of all existing and proposed streets, driveways, sidewalks,parking spaces,bicycle parking, loading areas and other facilities associated with the proposed use. O Ob Identification of the location and amount of building area proposed for retail sales or similar commercial activity. b O O Location of existing and proposed utilities(water, sewer,gas, electrical,telephone,oil tank etc.). O O )0 Design and location of all existing and proposed wells, septic tanks and leach field systems, or methods of waste water disposal. b O O Location,type and size of all existing and proposed landscaping and screening including fences and walls. O O )Q Location, size and proposed screening of outdoor storage areas,if any. O O Location, design and construction material of all existing or proposed site improvements, including drains, culverts, retaining walls,landscape walls and fences. b O O Exterior lighting plan and proposed signs to be located on site,including sign orientation, size,height,and elevation view. XJ O O Storm drainage plan and plans for snow removal and storage. O O Pedestrian and automobile circulation plan. O O Construction drawings for pavements,walks, steps, curbing,drainage& other structures associated with the proposed use. �1 O O Erosion and sedimentation control plan,including installation details of proposed control measures,directive construction notations and a schedule for the installation and maintenance of proposed control measure. O O Description of measures planned to assure proper erosion and sedimentation control in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 118 entitled "Erosion and Sediment Control,"of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook. JJO O O Drawing and computation for storm water detention design for a 25-year storm in accordance with the Westchester County Best Management Practices V O O Rock outcroppings and areas of steep slope consistent with the definitions set forth in Chapter 213, Steep Slope Protection, of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook. X) O O Location of any common lands and/or public lands. O O b Phasing or an estimated project construction schedule. O O O Supporting documents,including deeds,maintenance, condominium agreements,etc. Site Plan Checklist Page 3 of 7 Project Address Bowman Avenue X) O O Location of proposed construction or area of disturbance and its relationship to any property line, easement, building, structure, road, wall, fence, sewage disposal system, well, wetland feature or tree exceeding six inches in diameter measured at a height of four feet from the ground O O )() Estimate of earthwork showing the quantity of any material to be imported to and/or removed from the site including a chart with the number/species and size of any trees to be removed. O 010 Location and size of areas of soils by soil types in the area of proposed disturbance and to a distance of 100 feet surrounding the area of disturbance. O O )0 Cross sections of steep slope areas. 00 Retaining walls or like constructions,with details of construction. �l O O Approximate boundaries of any areas subject to flooding or stormwater overflows, including areas of special flood hazard and coastal high-hazard areas, consistent with the definitions set forth in Chapter 130, Flood Damage Prevention, of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook. Approximate Wetlands and wetland buffer boundaries shall be clearly delineated. X) O O Location of fire and other emergency zones, including the location of fire hydrants. )1 O O Studies to include,but not necessarily limited to: environmental impact analysis,wildlife,traffic, stormwater management,recreation,public service, fiscal impact,visual impact and historic significance documentation, or a written request to waive the submission requirements for these studies. O 0 )0 Amount of any bonds required. b 00 Amount of excavated material to be removed from site,if any. Y N NA OTHER (as applicable) O O )0 Record of application for and approval status of all necessary permits from state and county officials and local utility companies. O 06 Identification of any federal, state or county permits required for the project's execution,including project referrals, if any, &environmental review procedures mandated by Article 8,Environmental Quality Review, of the Environmental Conservation Law(SEQRA). O O )b Any other information felt necessary by the Planning Board to allow the Board to proceed with consideration&to make an informed decision. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CHECKLIST WESTCHESTER CO UNTY PLA NNING B OA RD Notice to Applicants/Developers: At some point during the development review process your project may be referred to the Westchester County Planning Board for review and comment in accordance with state and county laws that require local planning boards, zoning boards of appeals and governing bodies to refer certain development applications to the County Planning Board. Referral to the County Planning Board may not occur until your project has progressed well along through the design process. Since the Planning Board's comments may impact project design, this checklist is provided to encourage early consideration of these areas of concern by applicants to avoid project changes later. For information on the County Planning Board review process and to access an electronic copy of this checklist, go online to www.westchestergov.com/planningreferrals or contact Lukas Herbert at lah54westchestergov.com. L COUNTY PLANNING BOARD POLICIES: Written policies underlie all recommendations of the County Planning Board. Westchester 2025-Context for County and Municipal Planning and Policies to Guide County Planning, adopted by the County Planning Board on 5/6/08, amended 1/5/10, can be found at ww.westchestergov.com/2025. ❑ Westchester 2025: Policies should be reviewed to determine how they relate to the development proposal. IL IMPACTS TO COUNTY FACILITIES AND SERVICES: The County Planning Board coordinates the review of development projects with Westchester County departments to identify and address potential impacts on County services and infrastructure.In some situations,permits and approvals may be required that could change project design. Site Plan Checklist Page 4 of 7 Project Address Bowman Avenue ❑ Map of County Facilities: Review the State & County Roads and Parks map (which also includes county channel lines) to identify proximity to County facilities at: www.westchestergov.com/planningdocs/pdftnaps/countystateroadsparks.pdf Other useful map links for information about environmental features, septic/sewer map, county sewer districts map, etc can be found at: www.westchestergov.com/maps ® COUNTY ROAD: Applications for development on sites that abut a County road must be submitted for review by the County Department of Public Works. Information and forms can be found at: www.westchestergov.com/dpw/bldgperm.htm. Former County Roads do not need review by the Department of Public Works,but will still likely trigger a review by the County Planning Board. ❑ COUNTY CHANNEL LINES: Applications for development on sites within 100 feet of a designated County Channel Line require a stream control permit from the County Department of Public Works. Information and forms can be found at: www.westchestergov.com/dpw/bldgperm.htm ❑ COUNTY PARK: New construction & land alteration projects adjacent to County parks are expected to address screening & buffer of new uses from the park, as appropriate. Stormwater should not drain from a developed site onto a County park without acceptable quantity and quality controls. County parks are designated as Critical Environmental Areas. ❑ SEWAGE TREATMENT AT COUNTY TREATMENT PLANT: Local municipalities are required to reduce and eliminate inflow and infiltration(I&I)into the sanitary sewage systems tributary to County treatment plants.New development will be expected to reduce I&I in relation to generation of new, flow at a ratio of three to one. This requirement must be discussed with local officials. ❑BEE-LINE BUS SERVICE: Bee-Line bus stops serving a development site should be identified on plans or noted if located off-site. If a bus stop is located along the site's frontage, the applicant should contact the County Department of Transportation to discuss impacts and the need for improvements. Safe and separate pedestrian access should be provided to link a bus stop and sidewalk with building entrances. Information on County bus service and design guidelines can be found at: westchestergov.com/transportation/images/Bus%2OService%2OGuidelines.pdf ❑FAIR AND AFFORDABLE HOUSING: Many municipalities require inclusion of fair & affordable units in new developments. Financial assistance to achieve fair & affordable housing development is available through Westchester County & other sources. Applications that include new residential units to be affirmatively marketed & sold or rented subject to fair & affordable housing provisions should be tied to Westchester County guidelines on affordability including income guidelines of eligible households that can be found at: http://homes.westchestergov.com/. If County funding is sought to develop fair & affordable housing,the County Board of Legislators must be included as an involved agency under SEQR. ❑RECYCLING: New buildings must contain a designated area of sufficient size for separation and storage of recyclables and trash. Building expansions should also include sufficient space for separation and storage of recyclables. For more information about County recycling requirements go to: w-ww.westchestergov.com/environment—recycling.htm ❑STORM SEWER SYSTEM: Any connections to a County storm sewer line will require a permit from the Department of Public Works in accordance with the County Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination (IDDE) law. Information & forms can be found at: www.westchestergov.com/dpw/bldgperm.htm Non-stormwater discharges to the County storm sewer system are prohibited. III. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS The County Planning Board's land use policies focus attention on several aspects of development that may have intermunicipal and quality of life impacts.The list below includes areas most frequently commented on by the County Planning Board. ❑WATER: All development plans should include sufficient provisions for stormwater management, water quality measures and mitigation of flooding. ❑Plans should identify the major drainage basin or watershed the site is located in (Croton River, Upper Hudson River, Lower Hudson, Upper Long Island Sound, Bronx River and Lower Long Island Sound). An interactive map with watershed boundaries can be found at wryvw.westchestergov.com/planning/maps&lists/drainbasinsl lxl7.html ❑Watershed plans have been developed for several of the County's watersheds - the Croton, Indian Brook-Croton Gorge, Bronx River & Long Island Sound watersheds - that include specific recommendations that apply to development projects. See recommendations in watershed plans at:planning.westchestergov.com/index.php?option—com_content&task—view&id— 1231& Itemid-2204 Site Plan Checklist Page 5 of 7 Project Address Bowman Avenue ❑Development that involves filling, creation of impervious surfaces or buildings and substantive loss of natural vegetation in a floodplain or flood prone area should be avoided. ❑Above ground, vegetated retention/detention basins or devices are preferred because they perform better, are easier to inspect and maintain and provide additional environmental benefits over subsurface structural devices. Any such treatments should not be constructed within wetlands or buffer areas around wetlands. El The development should treat and retain as much stormwater on-site as possible, particularly when the site is located in a drainage basin with known flooding problems. A Construction Stormwater Toolbox with tools and sources of technical information related to the construction activities and stormwater management best practices is available from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation at: ,vx-ww.dec.ny.gov/chemical/8694.html ❑New development should include protection of aquatic resources. For more information about protection of aquatic resourc-es & buffer areas,go to: planning.westchestergov.com/index.php?option—com_content&task—view&id-1491&Itemid-2458 El Impervious cover should be minimized. Permeable paving surfaces should be used where feasible. Vegetative rain gardens should be used, particularly in areas of overland or channelized stormwater flow, to improve stormwater quality and reduce runoff volume. For more information, go to: www.westchestergov.com/stonnwater ❑Buildings along coastlines and low lying area should consider the impacts of sea.level rise. Specific consideration is required of potential impacts to surface and subsurface drinking water supplies. ❑ SITE LAYOUT. Aesthetic design,building orientation and community character should be considered in the site layout and building appearance. El In most locations,buildings should face the street and have pedestrian access from the street. ❑Commercial buildings should be located near the front street line with the majority of parking located in the rear of the building. Even gas stations and convenience stores should be upfront in a landscaped setting with parking,pumps and canopy toward the rear. ❑Buildings should be of pedestrian-scale when seen from the sidewalk. ❑Building facades should contribute to and enhance the character of the community. ❑Driveway and pathway connections should be provided to adjacent sites when possible and crosseasements provided. ❑ STREETS. Street design should reduce unwarranted paving and promote connectivity. ❑New streets should connect with adjacent streets wherever feasible to prevent the proliferation of dead-end streets and promote neighborhood integration. ❑Connections could be vehicular or pedestrian/bicycle only,where appropriate. ❑Street widths should be minimized for streets with low traffic volume to reduce speeds and impervious surfaces. Lane widths of 12 feet are only appropriate for major roadways. ❑Driveway widths should be no more than 9 feet to reduce impervious surfaces. El Permeable paving surfaces should be used where feasible. ❑ GREEN TECHNOLOGY.New development should include as many green building elements as possible, such as: renewable building materials, energy efficient heating/cooling systems and fixtures,water saving devices,green roofs and permeable paving surfaces. Information can be obtained from the U.S. Green Building Council at: www.usgbc.org. ❑ LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING. The site improvements should enhance community character. Site Plan Checklist Page 6 of 7 Project address Bowman Avenue ❑ Landscaping should consist of native plant species appropriate for the location.Invasive plant species should be prohibited. Invasive plant information available at:www.westchestergov.com/planning/environmental/Reports/InvasivePlantsBrochO8.pdf ❑ Pollutant tolerant plantings should effectively shield parking,loading areas and refuse collection sites. ❑ Site lighting should be provided at the lowest safe levels and lowest heights,avoiding all spillage off site. ❑ PEDESTRIANS. Safe, convenient and ADA accessible pedestrian access is provided. ❑ A sidewalk should be provided along the site frontage along each street. ❑ Direct pedestrian connections should be made from the front of the building to the sidewalk.Pedestrian crossings of drive-ways& parking lots should be minimized or avoided. If they must be provided,painted crosswalks should be provided through parking lots. ❑ ADA accessibility must be provided. ❑ BICYCLISTS. Provisions for bicyclists should be incorporated into project design. ❑ Bicycle parking should be provided in commercial and residential developments. Guidelines can be found at: w ww.apbp.org/resource/resmgr/publicati ons/bicycle_parking_guidelines.pdf ❑ If near a trailway or bicycle route, extra consideration should be given to bicycle accessibility such as bike lanes on internal roadways,bicycle parking and other amenities. ❑ Drive-thru lanes at uses such as banks and fast-food restaurants should also be accessible for bicycles. Waiver: Upon finding by the Building Inspector, Village Engineer, Planning Board or Board of Trustees that, due to the particular character or limited nature of development or change in use or to special conditions peculiar to a site, the submission of a final site plan, or certain portions of information normally required as part of the site development plan, is inappropriate or unnecessary or that strict compliance with said submission requirements will cause extraordinary and unnecessary hardship, such official or Board may waive such submission requirements wherever, in the opinion of such official or Board, such waiver will be consistent with the goal of promoting the public health, safety and general welfare of the community. The findings for granting such waiver shall become a part of the public record. Any waiver request must be made in writing, and include sufficient detailed information for the appropriate authority to make an informed decision. Design Professional's Certification of Completion of Checklist 1 have fully reviewed the Village of Rye Brook's requirements and certify this application to be a complete submission. I understand that an incomplete plat or incomplete checklist shall be deemed an incomplete submission and shall be returned to the applicant upon determination of such by the appropriate authority. Name(Print) James A.Ryan Signature Date March 16, 2016 Professional Seal Site Plan Checklist Page 7 of 7