HomeMy WebLinkAbout2013-03-14 - Planning Board Meeting Minutes Approved: 10/10/13
VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK
PLANNING BOARD
REGULAR MEETING
VILLAGE HALL, 938 KING STREET
Thursday March 14, 2013 - 8:00 p.m.
ROLL CALL
MINUTES
AFFORDABLE HOUSING
1. Review of an Amended Site Plan Application by Bowridge Commons,
LLC (Frank Madonna) for Fair and Affordable Housing for parcel located
at 80 Bowman Avenue, Rye Brook, NY parcel ID 141.27-1-26
• Considering a Report and Recommendation to the Board of Trustees
PUBLIC HEARING
CONTINUED BUSINESS
NEW BUSINESS
ACTION ON NON-AGENDA MATTERS
Subject to consent of Planning Board Members present at the meeting.
PRESENT
BOARD Mrs. Domenic Accurso
Mr. Robert Goodman
Mr. Bill Laufer
Mrs. Amy Schoen
Mr. Dan Tartaglia
Chairman Gary Zuckerman
EXCUSED Mr. Domenic Accurso
Gary Zuckerman, Chair
1
STAFF Mrs. Jennifer Gray, Village Counsel
Mrs. Marilyn Timpone-Mohamed, Village Planning Consultant
Mr. Mike Nowak, Jr. Acting Village Engineer
Ms. Shari Melillo, Planning Board Secretary
Chairman Zuckerman opened the meeting by asking everyone to join him in the
Pledge of Allegiance. He then introduced the Board members and the Village Staff
to the audience and explained the rules of procedure for the meeting. Additionally,
Chairman Zuckerman made note for the public that the complete set of Planning
Board Rules and Procedures can be found on the Village web and can also view the
Planning Board meetings on streaming video.
AFFORDABLE HOUSING
2. Review of an Amended Site Plan Application by Bowridge Commons,
LLC (Frank Madonna) for Fair and Affordable Housing for parcel
located at 80 Bowman Avenue, Rye Brook, NY parcel ID 141.27-1-26
• Considering a Report and Recommendation to the Board of Trustees
Anthony Federico, Architect for the applicant addressed the Board stating that this
application comes back to us from the Board of Trustees for a Report and
Recommendation for an amended site plan. The project is a 16 unit affordable
housing project on 1/2 acre on Bowman Avenue and Barber Place. On-site parking,
storm water management are both included on the plans. There was a request from
Westchester County to remove the exterior stairs from the plan and move them to
the interior which is more cost effective and that brings them back here for review.
Mrs. Timpone-Mohamed, Village Planning Consultant addressed the Board stating
they have reviewed the plans submitted to the Board of Trustees and essentially,
although the changes are minor, there are additional changes beyond moving the
stairs inside. The front of the building has moved out approximately 5 feet and in
one case the entire floor was pushed out and there is a shed room over it now. It has
increased the size of the units and it changed the shape of the front walkways so that
some of the lighting poles are in places that they interfere with handicapped access
or protrude into pedestrian walkways.
Mrs. Jennifer Gray, Village Attorney added that the zoning for this projected had
been changed to FAH and this application is just here to have the modifications
approved.
Mrs. Schoen is concerned about construction because of all the projects that have
been approved and are going to being construction soon. The applicant responded
that it would be about 3 months until they are ready to begin. She is also concerned
with traffic flow which Mr. Nowak responded that the way it pans out, the bridge
2
on Ridge Street, the project, the Bowman Avenue project and TD Bank on Ridge
Street could all potentially be underway at the same time. These projects will be
coordinated between the Building Department, Public Works, the Fire Department,
Police Department and EMS.
Mr. Grzan asked if by eliminating the exterior stairway did they now have to
include a landing. The response from the applicant was no because the length did
not change.
Mr. Nowak added that in regard to storm water, the impervious surface increased by
66 square feet total and the removal of the trees does not impact the storm water.
Mr. Tartaglia asked about a left hand turn to which Mrs. Mohammed responded that
Bowman Avenue is an entrance only, Barber Place is an entrance and an exit but
only a right turn out.
Mrs. Gray read the Report and Recommendation:
PLANNING BOARD OF THE VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE
VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK BOARD OF TRUSTEES ON THE
APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF AN AMENDED SITE PLAN
FOR 80 BOWMAN AVENUE
I. PROJECT OVERVIEW
On February 26, 2013, the Village of Rye Brook Board of Trustees ("BOT")
referred an application for approval of an Amended Site Plan to the Village of Rye
Brook Planning Board ("Planning Board") for submission of a Report and
Recommendation. The application was made by property owner, Bowridge
Commons LLC (Frank Madonna) ("Applicant") to amend the site plan previously
approved by the Board of Trustees on November 28, 2012 authorizing the
construction of eight (8) two-family attached dwellings on property located at 80
Bowman Avenue and designated as Section 141.27, Block 1, Lots 26, 31 and 32 on
the Town of Rye Tax Map ("Property"). On November 27, 2012, the Property was
rezoned from the C-1 Zoning District to the Fair and Affordable Housing ("FAH")
Zoning District.
3
The proposed amendments would relocate the exterior entry stairs for each of
the second-floor duplex units to the interior of each building and increase the floor
area of each building to accommodate the interior stairs. The front facades and
building entrances will also be modified along with the two primary pedestrian
walkways within the development. Minor revisions to the landscape plan will be
made to accommodate the revised layout.
II. PLANNING BOARD DISCUSSION
The Planning Board reviewed this application at its 1\/larch 14, 2013 meeting.
F.P. Clark Associates, the Village's Planning Consultant, provided Memoranda to the
Planning Board, dated March 8, 2013 and March 12, 2013, based on a review of the
application and information provided by the Applicant and Village Staff.
A. Site Plan Application
The following comments were provided by F.P. Clark's March 8, 2013
Memorandum:
1. General. Our office did not receive a current topographic
survey for review. The Applicant should provide the required
survey, or request a waiver from the requirement.
2. Zoning. When the Building Inspector completes a zoning
analysis of the proposed site plan,it maybe necessary that the
Applicant submit an amended FAH petition to the Trustees
that takes the proposed site plan amendments into account.
3. Site Plan. The revised site plan relocates the exterior
entry stairs to the second-floor units to the interior of each
building and increases the size of the units to accommodate
the new stairway location. We note that the ground-floor
units would be increased to 635 square feet; however, the size
4
of the units would continue to be smaller than FAH
requirement of 675 square feet.
In addition, the pedestrian walkways and certain planting
areas near the building entrances were revised to
accommodate the changes to the buildings.
4. Traffic and parking. The revised site plan does not
include alterations to the proposed parking areas, or the
number of parking spaces or curb cuts proposed.
5. Lighting Plan. We note that the lighting plan submitted is
the one originally approved and that it was not revised to
reflect the proposed building and site plan changes. The
applicant should clarify if the proposed building and site
plans require alterations to the lighting plan. If so, a revised
lighting plan should be submitted.
6. Landscape Plan. The landscape plan should be revised
to reflect revisions in the site plan. A typical planting plan for
the new planting areas adjacent to the building entrances
should be added to the landscape plan and the stormwater
swale to be located in the west and southern areas of the site
will require relocation or removal of trees proposed to be
planted according to the current landscape plan submitted.
7. Environmental Review and SEQRA. In our opinion, the
revisions to the proposed site and building plans are minor
changes that do not alter the proposed action significantly
with respect to any of the issues analyzed during the original
environmental review.
8. Storm water management plan. Revisions to the storm
water management plan should be reviewed and approved by
the Superintendent of Public Works/Village Engineer and/or
the engineering consultant.
9. Erosion and sediment control plan. Any revisions to
the erosion and sediment control plan should be reviewed
and approved by the Superintendent of Public Works/Village
Engineer.
5
10. Construction management plan. Any revisions to the
construction management plan should be provided, and
reviewed and approved by the Superintendent of Public
Works/Village Engineer.
F.P. Clark also provided the following supplementary comments regarding the
Lighting Plan and Landscape Plan via email memorandum to the Applicant's
Architect, dated March 12, 2013:
1. Lighting Plan: We understand that the lighting plan was
not revised. However, there are lighting standards near the
fronts of the buildings that are located so they obstruct the
paths of pedestrians using walkways in the site or obstruct the
ability of a person in a wheel chair to turn onto a pedestrian
path on a safe level walkway. Removal or relocation of the
lighting standards creating obstructions would correct the
issues.
2. Landscape Plan: The three Dogwood trees proposed to
be located in the drainage swale shown on Sheet 7 of the site
plans should be removed from the plan. A proposed tree
located directly adjacent to a light standard at one of the
Barber Avenue pedestrian entrances to the development also
shown on Sheet 7 of the site plans should be removed as it
would obstruct the light. A note should be added to the
planting plan shown on Sheet 7 of the site plans to indicate
that the planters at the fronts of each of the buildings will be
planted with perennial daylilies. And the existing note on
Sheet 7 outlining the mix of trees, shrubs and herbaceous
plants to be installed in planters should be revised to indicate
that the note refers to plants to be installed in the parking
area island planters.
According to the Applicant, new lighting features are not proposed in
conjunction with the revisions to the buildings. Existing lighting features located
near the fronts of the buildings which obstruct pedestrian traffic or the ability of a
6
person in a wheel chair to maneuver the sidewalk should be relocated to avoid such
obstructions.
The Applicant should revise the Landscape Plan in accordance with the
comments of FP Clark in its March 8, 2013 and March 12, 2013 memoranda. It is
the consensus of the Planning Board that such revisions are necessary to coordinate
the Landscape Plan with the remaining sheets in the plan set, including the
stormwater management plan, as there are currently several trees proposed within a
stormwater Swale. Such revisions are also necessary to provide an appropriate and
aesthetically-pleasing planting plan for the proposed residential community.
Regarding stormwater management, the Village Engineer/Superintendent of
Public `Forks had determined by memorandum dated March 14, 2013 that no
changes to the previously approved Stormwater Management Plan are necessary due
to the de minimus nature of the increase (66 s.£) in impervious surface coverage
proposed in the Amended Site Plan.
Other issues raised in F.P. Clark's March 8, 2013 memorandum have been
resolved. A topographic survey of the property prepared by Thomas C. Merritts
Land Surveyors is on file with the Village from the previous site plan application and
no changes to the property have occurred since that time. Furthermore, pursuant to
the Village of Rye Brook Building Inspector's Zoning Analysis Memoranda, dated
March 11, 2013 and March 12, 2013, the Amended Site Plan does not change the
waivers from the dimensional and bulk requirements of the FAH District previously
approved by the Board of Trustees on November 27, 2012, except that the Amended
7
Site Plan would provide a minimum required floor area for a one-bedroom AFFH
unit that is more in compliance with the required standard. In that regard, pursuant
to Village of Rye Brook Code 5250-26.1(F)(3)(d) the minimum required floor area for
a one-bedroom AFFH unit is 675 sq. ft., a waiver of 58 sq. ft. was previously
approved by the BOT, and the Amended Site Plan proposes a floor area of 635 sq. ft.
which is only 40 sq. ft. less than the 675 sq. ft. minimum. Thus, the Building
Inspector has determined that no additional waivers are required for the Amended
Site Plan.
III. PLANNING BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS
After discussion and consideration of the issues raised by the Village's staff
and consultants the Planning Board recommends approval of the application for an
Amended Site Plan, provided the following items are satisfactorily addressed:
1. The Lighting Plan must be revised to relocate the lighting
features which obstruct pedestrian and wheelchair traffic on
the walkways along the fronts of the buildings. The
Applicant has agreed to make these revisions in conformity
with F.P. Clark's recommendations.
2. The Landscape Plan must be revised in accordance with
the comments provided by F.P. Clark in its March 8, 2013
and March 12, 2013 memoranda. The Applicant has agreed
to make these revisions.
To the extent any waiver from the submission requirement for a topographic
survey is required, the Planning Board recommends approval of such waiver based
on the recommendation of the Village Engineer/Superintendent of Public Works as
set forth in his March 14, 2013 memorandum.
Dated:Rye Brook, New York
8
March 14, 2013
After a brief discussion regarding some working issues, a motion was made by Mr.
Goodman and seconded by Mrs. Schoen and the resolution was adopted. Mr. Nowak
called the roll:
MR. ACCURSO ABSENT
MR. GOODMAN YES
MR. GRZAN YES
MR. LAUFER YES
MRS. SCHOEN YES
MR. TARTAGLIA NO
CHAIRMAN ZUCKERMAN ABSENT
Mrs. Gray read the resolution sending the Report and Recommendation to the
Board of Trustees:
RESOLUTION
AUTHORIZING SUBMISSION OF REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES ON THE ON
THE
APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF AN AMENDED SITE PLAN FOR
80 BOWMAN AVENUE
BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Board of the Village of Rye Brook
adopts the attached Report and Recommendation to the Village of Rye Brook Board
of Trustees on the application for approval of an amended site plan and requests the
Secretary to the Planning Board forward a copy of the Report to the Board of
Trustees and the Village Administrator.
On a motion made by Mr. Goodman and seconded by Mrs. Schoen, the resolution
was adopted and Mr. Nowak called the roll:
MR. ACCURSO ABSENT
MR. GOODMAN YES
MR. GRZAN YES
MR. LAUFER YES
MRS. SCHOEN YES
MR. TARTAGLIA NO
CHAIRMAN ZUCKERMAN ABSENT
9
On a motion made by Mrs. Schoen and seconded by Mr. Tartaglia, the meeting was
adjourned at 8:51pm by unanimous voice vote.
10