Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2015-06-11 - Planning Board Meeting Documents � 0 SUN HOMES RYE BROOK RECKSON EXECUTIVE PARK RYE BROOK,NY „E�7O � NPc e N1 1-1 PLANNER&CIVIL ENGINEER: DivNEY-Time•SCHWALRE ImelligartlaM 0 LEGAL COUNSEL: / Cuddy&Feder,LLP 445 Hamilton Avenue,1411,Flog While Plains.NY 10601 SURVEYOR: Linl<Land Surveyors.P.C. /� 55 ­L11 N11 rvo,,_,3 ` 21 Clarl< Y Mahopac,NY 105+1 ---- === ---- ------ EINE -.s 0 .• I � CONCEPTUAL sa SITE PLAN a,slry —N — ��r p88 85/2J/15 ..[ (1) 7%-77 00 301 10 SP-1 .0 —LE I" 60' PAOPEa.,��E� 340 = I 336 = I 3, y 360 I SECTION A—A' 32a Ai- ��RaPosm eaw� — Zea SECTION B-B' I 330 I u, svc> — 366 e ---- 3 _ --------------------- rii s, -----------I —————————————— ' ——------------------———————————————— 21 SECTION C-C' DNrv[r'1t.NG•$6M�I� SITE SECTIONS SUN HOMES 5/27/2015 445 Avenu CUDDY& White P aiinss, New Yoerkl 06011oor r.�r Tel 914.761.1300 Fax 914.7b1.5372 FEDERwww.cuddyfeder.com May 27, 2015 BY HAND & BY EMAIL: mnowak r ebrook.or Mr. Gary Zuckerman, Chairman, and Members of the Planning Board Village of Rye Brook 93 8 King Street Rye Brook,New York 10573 Re: Sun Homes (Phase 3 Reekson Executive Park) Application for Re-Mapping of Premises into the Planned Unit Development District Premises: 1100 King Street; Section 129.25 Block 1 Lot 1 Dear Chairman Zuckerman and Members of the Planning Board: On behalf of Sun Homes, in furtherance of this pending Application and Petition, we respectfully submit this letter addressing comments and questions raised by Board Members and the Village's professional consultants. ESTF Review, Memorandum dated May 7, 2015 prepared by Michael J. Izzo, Building and Fire Inspector 1. Consistent with previous applications, an emergency access driveway is shown on the Concept Plan, which driveway runs across the northerly area of the site and behind the existing office complex connecting to King Street between the two existing but previously abandoned entry gate columns. 2. The roads will be widened in those areas where fire hydrants will be located to 26 feet. The Concept Plans will be updated during site plan review once the hydrant locations have been identified. 3. The Applicant will review the road naming and unit numbering scheme with ESTF. 4. The three small dead-end roads will be limited to 150 feet as required. 5. A plan will be provided during site plan review to include the vehicle route and turning radius for fire apparatus and buses. 6. The line of sight for the traffic signal at King Street and International Drive will be reviewed during Site Plan Approval in the second phase of the Village's review herein. FR Clark Associates, Memorandum dated May 13, 2015 prepared by Marilyn Timpone Mohamed 1. Ms. Mohamed noted that the AFFH Units be interspersed amongst the market-rate units. Comment noted. 2. In response to Ms. Mohamed's request, the Conceptual Plan was revised to provide a 20 foot long driveway in front of the garage at each of the AFFH units. The C&F:2778529,1 ATTORNEYS AT L.AW White Plains Fishkill New York City Stamford CUDDY FEDER" May 27, 2015 Page 2 previous version of the plan showed 15 surface parking spaces and 10 garage spaces for the AFFH units, We are now showing 12 surface parking spaces, 10 garage spaces, and full-depth driveways to accommodate an additional 10 vehicles. 3. The Traffic and Parking comments referenced in the Galante Memorandum are separately addressed below. F.P. Clark Associates, Memorandum dated May 19, 2015 prepared by Michael A. Galante 1. The Accident experience information is summarized in tabular form, as requested. See attached response in Maser Consulting Memorandum, dated May 26, 2015. 2. The method for implementation of traffic signal timing is detailed in the Maser Consulting Memorandum, dated May 26, 2015. 3. When the Site Plan Application is submitted following the Conceptual Plan Review by the Village, it will address the comments set forth in the March 31, 2015 Memorandum from Mr. Galante. a. As noted above, an emergency access connection will be provided through the office park to King Street. b. The configuration and size of the dead end roads will be addressed during Site Plan review. As noted above, the roads would comply with the NYS Building Code's dimensional requirements and additional provisions can be evaluated to include passenger vehicle turn-around and/or signage. C. Perpendicular parking spaces have been modified and parallel parking spaces have been provided along the main entry drive. d. Due to limited space available a roundabout intersection at the entrance is not feasible. e. During the Site Plan review, all parking will be identified including those located in driveways. Planning Board Comments—Meeting of May 14, 2015 1. Potential Visual Impacts from Bellefair and Doral Green—although the project is consistent with land uses at Bellefair and Doral Green, additional review and evaluation will be provided during Site Plan review. 2. The Applicant has requested SL Green to consider removing a portion of the office parking lot that extends into the proposed residential development. We will advise the Planning Board upon receipt of a response from SL Green. 3. The number of at grade spaces located at the AFFH units has been modified, as noted above. C&Fr 2776529,1 CUDDY& FEDER"' May 27, 2015 Page 3 4. It is noted that a sign will be proposed at King Street and International Drive and will be included in the Application for Site Plan review. The Applicant is in discussion with SL Green regarding the location and extent of signage in this area. 5. The density of the proposed project is approximately 3.5 units per acre. For comparison purposes, the respective densities of Bellefair, Doral Green and the Arbors, their densities are: a) Bellefair—260 units on 140 acres (approximately 1.9 dwelling units per acre; b) Doral Greens— 178 units on 22.6 acres (approximately 7.9 dwelling units per acre; and c) The Arbors —250 units on 37 acres (approximately 6.8 dwelling units per acre). 6. As suggested the Clubhouse and swimming pool were relocated to be more centrally located upon entering the project from International Drive. 7. There remains theoretical development potential on the remaining Reckson Executive Park In furtherance of these revisions, we respectfully enclose fifteen (15) copies of the following documents: A. A revised drawing entitled, "Conceptual Site Plan, Sun Homes, Rye Brook" (SP-1.0), dated May 27, 2015, prepared by Divney Tung Schwalbe; B. A revised drawing entitled, "Site Sections, Sun Homes, Rye Brook," dated May 27, 2015, prepared by Divney Tung Schwalbe;and C. A Memorandum prepared by Maser Consulting, dated May 26, 2015, responding to questions raised since our last submission. We look forward to appearing before the Planning Board to address any questions. Thank you for your consideration. Respec 11�y,,y; s>..� Wif 1i ull WSN:yp1! Enclosures cc: (w/enclosures): Mr, Christopher Bradbury, Village Manager;Philip Butler, Esq.; Mr. Michal J Nowak; Marilyn Timpone-Mohamed; Mr. Michael Galante; Messrs. Robert Dale, Bill McGuinness and Rudolf Mutter; Mr. John Barnes, Messrs, Gerhard M. Schwalbe and Jason Bajor; Dr. John Collins; Mr. Ronald P. Rieman; Anthony B. Gioffre 1II, Esq; and Ms. Norma Drummond C&F 2778529.1 Engineers 1 1 Bradhurst Avenue %WV Planners Hawthorne, NY 10532 Surveyors T:914.347.7500 1VIAS E R Landscape Architects F:914.347.7266 Environmental Scientists www.maserconsulting.com I I N I I L T 1 1 1 P. A. MEMORANDUM To: Village of Rye Brook Planning Board Copy: Michael A. Galante, Executive Vice President Steven Cipolla, Associate/Transportation From: John T. Collins, Ph. D., P.E. Ronald P. Rieman,Assistant Project Manager Date: May 26, 2015 Re: Sun Homes at Reckson Executive Park Rye Brook, Westchester County, New York MC Proiect No. 14001622A The following are responses to the Frederick P. Clark Associates, Inc. (FPC) — May 19, 2015 review memo on the updated Traffic Evaluation dated April 15, 2015 as outlined below. 1. Accident Experience—As requested the ConnDOT accident data has been summarized in Tables No. 1 and 2 (attached) by location, mile mark, date, time, number of vehicles/injuries, lighting, road surface condition, weather condition, collision type and apparent contributing factors to supplement the ConnDOT Summary Tables (Tables 1 through 17) and Accident Experience Detail Reports. As summarized in Tables No. 1 and 2, there were 4 reported accidents in 2011, 4 reported accidents in 2012 and 7 reported accidents in 2013 along Route 120A (King Street) between International Drive and Anderson Hill Road. Based on a review of the Accident Data, the type of accidents are typical type of accidents such as rear end accidents and turning accidents with apparent contributing factors such as failure to yield right of way and driver following too close. Based on the above, as noted in our April 15, 2015 update, "It is not expected that the proposed Residential development (I 10 homes) will have a significant impact on the accident rate on the area roadways." A copy of the ConnDOT accident data is also attached. Customer Loyalty through Client Satisfaction Village of Rye Brook Planning Board May 26, 2015 4VPage2 of 2 MASER C e x e u L T I N C P. A. 2. Traffic Impact Analysis — The traffic signal timing changes are based on the conservative traffic projections requested as part of the April 15, 2015 update to increase the existing 386,000 s.f of occupied office space which is generating lower traffic volumes to higher ITE rates for the entire building (540,000 s.f.) under No-Build Conditions. In addition traffic for the PepsiCo Master Plan was also included in the traffic volume projections. It should be noted that the traffic signal timing changes would be needed under the No-Build Condition if the traffic projections are met. As with traffic conditions at any location, the responsible agency (i.e., NYSDOT, ConnDOT, Town of Greenwich) would make any necessary timing changes over time to reflect the then current traffic volumes. As noted in the comment, the "Results of the analysis indicate a reduction in impacts with the residential development compared to office development." As outlined in our April 15, 2015 Traffic Evaluation, the Proposed Residential development would result in significantly fewer vehicles (212 fewer vehicles during the Weekday Peak AM Highway Hour and 199 fewer vehicles during the Weekday Peak PM Highway Hour) and better Levels of Service when compared to the traffic generated by the approved Reckson Executive Park (R.E.P.) Phase III office building. If you have any questions on the above or need any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact us. r:\projects\2014\14001622a-residential\reports\traffic\word\150526 response_memo.docx TABLE NO.1 ACCIDENT SUMMARY TABLE BY LOCATION KING STREET-TOWN OF GREENWICH FROM CT STATE LINE TO 0.59 MILES SOUTH OF ANDERSON HILL ROAD CASE LOCATION MILE MARK DATE TIME VEHICLES- LIGHTING ROAD SURFACE WEATHER CONDITION COLLISION TYPE APPARENT CONTRIBUTING FACTORS NUMBER INJURIES CONDITION 1300007439 -100 METERS NORTH OF WILLOW RUN ROAD AT 0.16 02/26/13 4:49 PM 1-1 DAYLIGHT DRY NO ADVERSE CONDITION FIXED OBJECT DRIVER LOST CONTROL 1300001257 100 METERS NORTH OF WILLOW RUN ROAD AT 0.17 01/11/13 7:33 PM 2-0 DARK-LIGHTED WET RAIN REAR END FOLLOWING TOO CLOSELY 1300000548 50 FEET NORTH OF HETTIEFRED ROAD AT 025 01/05/13 7:36 PM 2-0 DARK-NOT LIGHTED DRY NO ADVERSE CONDITION REAR END FOLLOWING TOO CLOSELY 1200004472 AT HETTIEFRED ROAD AT 0.26 02/08/12 11:47 PM 2-2 DARK-LIGHTED DRY NO ADVERSE CONDITION SIDESWIPE IMPROPER PASSING 11-900108 87 FEET SOUTH OF HETTIEFRED ROAD AT 0.28 01/22/11 6:01 PM 1-0 DARK-LIGHTED DRY NO ADVERSE CONDITION FIXED OBJECT DRIVER LOST CONTROL 11-900160 100 FEET SOUTH OF HETTIEFRED ROAD AT 0.28 02/01/11 7:41 AM 2-0 DAYLIGHT SNOW/SLUSH SNOW REAR END FOLLOWING TOO CLOSELY 1300041274 AT BOWMAN DRIVE NORTH AT 0 37 11/14/13 9:19 AM 2-0 DAYLIGHT DRY NO ADVERSE CONDITION SIDESWIPE IMPROPER LANE CHANGE 1300031401 27 FEET NORTH OF STONEHEDGE DRIVE NORTH AT 0.46 08/26/13 2:03 PM 2-2 DAYLIGHT DRY NO ADVERSE CONDITION REAR END FOLLOWING TOO CLOSELY 1200032855 30 FEET NORTH OF STONEHEDGE DRIVE NORTH AT 0.48 10/06/12 4:36 AM 1-1 DARK-LIGHTED DRY NO ADVERSE CONDITION FIXED OBJECT FELL ASLEEP 1300019202 50 FEET NORTH OF STONEHEDGE DRIVE NORTH AT 0.49 05/27/13 7:11 PM 2-0 DAYLIGHT DRY NO ADVERSE CONDITION REAR END FOLLOWING TOO CLOSELY 11-900474 AT ANDERSON HILL ROAD AT 0.50 04/23/11 12:17 PM 2-1 DAYLIGHT WET RAIN REAR END FOLLOWING TOO CLOSELY 1100038182 AT ANDERSON HILL ROAD AT 0.50 08/27/11 6:12 PM 2-1 DARK-LIGHTED WET RAIN REAR END FOLLOWING TOO CLOSELY 1200013182 AT ANDERSON HILL ROAD AT 0 50 04/26/12 8:11 PM 2-0 DARK-LIGHTED WET RAIN TURNING FAILURE TO GRANT RIGHT-OF-WAY 1200030104 AT ANDERSON HILL ROAD AT 0.50 09/14/12 10:22 AM 2-0 DAYLIGHT DRY NO ADVERSE CONDITION FIXED OBJECT DRIVER LOST CONTROL 1300033549 45 FEET SOUTH OF ANDERSON HILL ROAD AT 0.51 09/13/13 1:42 PM 2-0 DAYLIGHT DRY NO ADVERSE CONDITION REAR END FOLLOWING TOO CLOSELY ACCIDENT DATA OBTAINED FROM THE CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION(CONNDOT FROM JANUARY 1,2011 THROUGH DECEMBER 31,2012 MC 14001622A MAY 22,2015 TABLE NO.2 ACCIDENT SUMMARY TABLE BY YEAR KING STREET-TOWN OF GREENWICH FROM CT STATE LINE TO 0.59 MILES SOUTH OF ANDERSON HILL ROAD CASE O LOCATION MILE MARK DATE TIME VEHICLES- LIGHTING ROAD SURFACE WEATHER CONDITION COLLISION TYPE APPARENT CONTRIBUTING FACTORS NUMBER INJURIES CONDITION 11-900108 -100 METERS NORTH OF WILLOW RUN ROAD AT 0.28 01/22/11 6:01 PM 1-0 DARK-LIGHTED DRY NO ADVERSE CONDITION FIXED OBJECT DRIVER LOST CONTROL 11-900160 100 FEET SOUTH OF HETTIEFRED ROAD AT 0.28 02/01111 7:41 AM 2-0 DAYLIGHT SNOW/SLUSH SNOW REAR END FOLLOWING TOO CLOSELY 11-900474 AT ANDERSON HILL ROAD AT 0.50 04/23/11 12:17 PM 2-1 DAYLIGHT WET RAIN REAR END FOLLOWING TOO CLOSELY 1100038182 AT ANDERSON HILL ROAD AT 0.50 08/27/11 8:12 PM 2-1 DARK-LIGHTED WET RAIN REAR END FOLLOWING TOO CLOSELY 1200004472 AT HETTIEFRED ROAD AT 0.26 02/08/12 11:47 PM 2-2 DARK-LIGHTED DRY NO ADVERSE CONDITION SIDESWIPE IMPROPER PASSING 1200013182 AT ANDERSON HILL ROAD AT 0.50 04/26/12 8:11 PM 2-0 DARK-LIGHTED WET RAIN TURNING FAILURE TO GRANT RIGHT-OF-WAY 1200030104 AT ANDERSON HILL ROAD AT 0.50 09/14/12 10:22 AM 2-0 DAYLIGHT DRY NO ADVERSE CONDITION FIXED OBJECT DRIVER LOST CONTROL 1200032855 30 FEET NORTH OF STONEHEDGE DRIVE NORTH AT 0.48 10/06/12 4:36 AM 1-1 DARK-LIGHTED DRY NO ADVERSE CONDITION FIXED OBJECT FELL ASLEEP 1300000548 50 FEET NORTH OF HETTIEFRED ROAD AT 0.25 01/05/13 7:36 PM 2-0 DARK-NOT LIGHTED DRY NO ADVERSE CONDITION REAR END FOLLOWING TOO CLOSELY 1300001257 100 METERS NORTH OF WILLOW RUN ROAD AT 0.17 01/11113 7:33 PM 2-0 DARK-LIGHTED WET RAIN REAR END FOLLOWING TOO CLOSELY 1300007439 -100 METERS NORTH OF WILLOW RUN ROAD AT 0.16 02/26/13 4:49 PM 1-1 DAYLIGHT DRY NO ADVERSE CONDITION FIXED OBJECT DRIVER LOST CONTROL 1300019202 50 FEET NORTH OF STONEHEDGE DRIVE NORTH AT 0.49 05/27/13 7:11 PM 2-0 DAYLIGHT DRY NO ADVERSE CONDITION REAR END FOLLOWING TOO CLOSELY 1300031401 27 FEET NORTH OF STONEHEDGE DRIVE NORTH AT 0.46 08/26/13 2:03 PM 2-2 DAYLIGHT DRY NO ADVERSE CONDITION REAR END FOLLOWING TOO CLOSELY 1300033549 45 FEET SOUTH OF ANDERSON HILL ROAD AT 0 51 09/13/13 1:42 PM 2-0 DAYLIGHT DRY NO ADVERSE CONDITION REAR END FOLLOWING TOO CLOSELY 1300041274 AT BOWMAN DRIVE NORTH AT 0.37 11/14/13 9:19 AM 2-0 DAYLIGHT DRY NO ADVERSE CONDITION SIDESWIPE IMPROPER LANE CHANGE ACCIDENT DATA OBTAINED FROM THE CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION(CONNOOT FROM JANUARY 1,2011 THROUGH DECEMBER 31,2012 MC 14001622A MAY 22,2015 ConnDOT DATA f Engineers 1 1 Bradhurst Avenue Planners Hawthorne,NY 10532 Surveyors T:914.347.7500 MASER Landscape Architects F:914.347.7266 Environmental Scientists www.maserconsulting.com C O k I tl 4 r � N A PA. April 8, 2015 VIA E-MAIL Mr. Kerry Ross Transportation Supervising Planner ConnDOT 2800 Berlin Turnpike Newington, CT 06111 Re: Accident Request Greenwich, Connecticut MC Proiect No. 14001622A Dear Mr. Ross: I would like to request both the accident experience for the following years 2012, 2013 and 2014 for the following link. • Route 120A (King Street)from International Drive to 500' south of Anderson Hill Road Please notify us of any cost associated with this request. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Very truly yours, MASER CONSULTING P.A. Ronald P. Rieman Assistant Project Manager R:\Projects\2014\I 4001622A-ResidentialTroject Cnformation\Accident\150407 ConnDOT Accident Request.doex JOHN COLLINS ENGINEERS, P.C. has joined Maser Consulting P.A, Ronald Rieman From: Acosta, Ryan J. <Ryan.Acosta@ct.gov> Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2015 8:57 AM To: Ronald Rieman Cc: Ross, Kerry J;Interlandi, Eugene J Subject: FW: Accident Request - Greemwich, CT Attachments: 150407 ConnDOT Accident Request.pdf; DATACONTENT-11-13.pdf; 11-13-Greenwich-King - Summary.pdf; 11-13-Greenwich-King-History.pdf Ron, Attached is the information that you requested. The 2011-2013 data provided is currently the latest three year period available. The road requsted International Drive is in New York. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions on the information provided. Ryan Acosta Transportation Planning Assistant Connecticut Department of Transportation Crash Data and Analysis P.O. Box 317546 Newington, CT 06131-7546 Si Phone: (860) 594-2053 y'i Fax: (860) 594-2044 ® Email ryan.acostaCo)ct.gov From: Interlandi, Eugene J Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2015 2:27 PM To: Acosta, Ryan J. Subject: FW: Accident Request- Greemwich, CT Please provide a 2011-2013 accident experience for the requested location. Include the statement"The 2011-2013 data provided is currently the latest three year period available." From: Ross, Kerry J Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2015 1:24 PM To: Interlandi, Eugene J Subject: FW: Accident Request- Greemwich, CT ptcot From: Ronald Rieman [mailto:rri man maserconsultin .corn] Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2015 10:52 AM To: Ross, Kerry J Subject: Accident Request - Greemwich, CT Mr. Ross Please see attached accident request. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you, Ron Ronald P Rieman Assistant Project Manager Connne�ectt with Us: ©OM10cm Maser Consulting P.A. 11 Bradhurst Avenue I Hawthorne, NY 10532 P: 914.347.7500 ext: 4807 www.moserconsultina.com APlease consider the environment before printing this e-mail. In an ongoing effort to meet our clients'growing needs and affirm the company's strategic plan,we are reinforcing our existing services while expanding regionally. Maser Consulting recently opened new offices in Philadelphia,PA and Norfolk,VA,and has acquired Environmental Compliance,Inc.(ECI).ECI brings 30 years of experience in hazardous materials site inspection,assessment and remediation. DISCLAIMER This e-mail is confidential. It may also be legally privileged. If you are not the addressee you may not copy, forward, disclose or use any part of this email text or attachments. If you have received this message in error, please delete it and all copies from your system and notify the sender immediately by return e-mail. Internet communications cannot be guaranteed to be timely, secure, error or virus free. The sender does not accept liability for any errors or omissions.Any drawings, sketches, images, or data are to be understood as copyright protected. 2 STATE OF CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BUREAU OF POLICY AND PLANNING CRASH DATA AND ANALYSIS SECTION ACCIDENT DATA CONTENT Data in the enclosed report reflects that which was contained in the Department of Transportation's accident file on the date that this report was generated and represents accidents occurring during the time period January 1,2011 through December 31,2013. REPORTING LEVEL Investigating police authorities have been required to complete an accident report within five days of the completion of such investigation for any accident that resulted in death, injury or a prescribed dollar amount of damage to the property of any one individual. The prescribed dollar amounts and their effective periods are as follows: $1,000,from October 1, 1988 to present;$600,from October 1, 1984 to September 30, 1988;and$400,from January 1, 1974 to September 30, 1984. Before October 1, 1990, both operator and police accident reports were required to be completed and forwarded to the Department of Motor Vehicles. Effective with accidents occurring on October 1, 1990 and thereafter, in accordance with Public Act 90-143, the requirement of involved operators to complete an Operator Accident Report was rescinded by the State Legislature. Investigating police authorities are also now required to forward accident reports to the Department of Transportation instead of the Department of Motor Vehicles as formerly required. Effective with accidents occurring on January 1, 2009 and thereafter, some investigating police authorities are now submitting accident reports electronically to the Department of Transportation. Other investigating police authorities are continuing to forward hard copy reports. Data in the Department of Transportation's accident file reflects data captured from both electronic and hard copy reports. EXCLUSION OF LOCAL ROAD PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY ACCIDENTS Property damage only accidents which occurred on locally maintained roadways from August 1, 1990 to December 31, 1991, from April 1, 1992 to December 31,2006 and from March 1,2011 to December 31,2011 were not coded for inclusion in the Department of Transportation's accident file. Data users should be aware of the exclusion of local road property damage only accidents for these time periods. DATA LIMITATIONS The Department of Transportation devotes considerable resources to the analysis of each accident received and to the codification of the location of each accident. Each accident entered into the Department's data entry system is reviewed for accuracy and completeness. Quality control routines are included in the system that validate the data. The user of the data contained in the enclosed report should be aware of certain limitations. All accidents which actually occurred within the area covered by the report: - May not have been received by the Department of Transportation; May not have contained sufficient information to have been located in the physical area covered by this report;or May not have been appropriately located by the Department of Transportation during codification, data entry, file maintenance or data retrieval activities. Accidents contained within the enclosed report may not have actually occurred within the physical area covered by the report,but have been placed there due to, either, insufficient or misleading information contained in the accident report or to misallocation of the accident during codification,data entry,file maintenance or data retrieval activities. CONTRIBUTING FACTORS The contributing factors indicated on the accident experience and/or accident summary have been determined by the Department of Transportation's Crash Data and Analysis section and are used by the Department in its ongoing engineering evaluation of Connecticut's roads and highways. Each contributing factor has been determined subjectively and is not meant to assign legal responsibility. From 1/1/2011 12:00:00 AM until 12/31/2013 11:59:59 PM page 1 of 11 Report Generated 4/9/2015 8:45:00 AM Town of Greenwich RoadlRoute#735 KING ST NO 2 from 0.00 to 0.59 1/1/2011 to 12/31/2013 Accident Experience Summary Report Table 1 -Accident Severity Accident Severity 2011 2012 2013 Total % Fatal 0 0 0 0 0.00 A-Injury 0 1 1 2 13.33 B-Injury 0 1 1 2 13.33 C-injury 2 0 0 2 13.33 Property Damage Only 2 2 5 9 60.00 TOTAL 41 4 7 151 100.00% Table 2-Month and Year of Occurrence Month 2011 2012 2013 Total % January 1 0 2 3 20.00 February 1 1 1 3 20.00 March 0 0 0 0 0.00 April 1 1 01 2 13.33 May 0 0 1 1 6.67 June 0 0 0 0 0.00 July 0 0 0 0 0.00 August 1 0 1 2 13.33 September 0 1 1 2 13.33 October 0 1 0 1 6.67 November 0 0 1 1 6.67 December 01 0 0 0 0.00 TOTAL 41 4 7 15 100.00% From 1/1/2011 12:00:00 AM until 12/31/2013 11:59:59 PM page 2 of 11 Report Generated 4S/2015 8:45:00 AM Town of Greenwich Road/Route#735 KING ST NO 2 from 0.00 to 0.59 Table 3-Hour anal Bey®k1Me®k Hour and Day of Week Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Total % Midnight to 12:59 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 1:00 AM to 1:59 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 2:00 AM to 2:59 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 3:00 AM to 3:59 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 4:00 AM to 4:59 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 1 6.67 5:00 AM to 5:59 AM 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 0.00 8:00 AM to 6:59 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 7:00 AM to 7:59 AM 01 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 6.67 8:00 AM to 8:59 AM 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 0.00 9:00 AM to 9:59 AM 0 0 0 01 1 0 0 1 6.67 10:00 AM to 10:59 AM 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 6.67 11:00 AM to 11:59 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 Noon to 12:59 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 6.67 1:00 PM to 1:59 PM 01 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 6.67 2:00 PM to 2:59 PM 01 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 6.67 3:00 PM to 3:59 PM 01 0 0 0 0 0 Oj 0 0.00 4:00 PM to 4:59 PM 01 0 1 0 0 0 01 1 6.67 5:00 PM to 5:59 PM 01 0 0 01 0 0 01 0 0.00 6:00 PM to 6:59 PM 01 0 0 01 0 0 11 1 6.67 7:00 PM to 7:59 PM 01 1 0 01 0 1 11 3 20.00 8:00 PM to 8:59 PM 01 0 0 01 1 0 1 2 13.33 9:00 PM to 9:59 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 10:00 PM to 10:59 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 11:00 PM to 11:59 PM 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 6.67 Unknown Time 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 0.00 TOTAL 0 2 2 1 2 31 51 15 100.00°� From 1/12011 12:00:00 AM until 12131/2013 11:59:59 PM page 3 of 11 Report Generated 449/2015 8:45:00 AM Town of Greenwich Road/Route#735 KING ST NO 2 from 0.00 to 0.59 Table 4-Hour of ffceurrence Hour of Occurrence 2011 2012 2013 Total % Midnight to 12:59 AM 0 0: 0 0 0.00 1:00 AM to 1:59 AM 0 0 0 0 0.00 2:00 AM to 2:59 AM 0 0 0 0 0.00 3:00 AM to 3:59 AM 0 0 0 0 0.00 4:00 AM to 4:59 AM 0 1 0 1 6.67 5:00 AM to 5:59 AM 0 0 0 0 0.00 6:00 AM to 6:59 AM 0 0 0 0 0.00 7:00 AM to 7:59 AM 1 0 0 1 6.67 8:00 AM to 8:59 AM 0 0 0 0 0.00 9:00 AM to 9:59 AM 0 0 1 1 6.67 10:00 AM to 10:59 AM 0 1 0 1 6.67 11:00 AM to 11:59 AM 0 0 0 0 0.00 Noon to 12:59 PM 1 0 0 1 6.67 1:00 PM to 1:59 PM 0 0 1 1 6.67 2:00 PM to 2:59 PM 0 0 1 1 6.67 3:00 PM to 3:59 PM 0 0 0 0 0.00 4:00 PM to 4:59 PM 0 0 1 1 6.67 5:00 PM to 5:59 PM 0 0 0 0 0.00 6:00 PM to 6:59 PM 1 0 0 1 6.67 7:00 PM to 7:59 PM 0 0 3 3 20.00 8:00 PM to 8:59 PM 1 1 0 2 13.33 9:00 PM to 9:59 PM 0 0 0 0 0.00 10:00 PM to 10:59 PM 0 0 0 0 0.00 11:00 PM to 11:59 PM 0 1 0 1 6.67 Unknown Time 0 01 01 0 0.00 TOTAL 4 41 71 151 100.00% From 1/1/2011 12:00:00 AM until 12/31/2013 11:59:59 PM page 4 of 11 Report Generated 419x2015 8:45:00 AM Town of Greenwich Road/Route#735 KING ST NO 2 from 0.00 to 0.59 Table 5-Weather Condition Weather Condition 2011 2012 2013 Total % No Adverse Condition 1 3 6 10 56.67 Rain 2 1 1 4 26.67 Snow 1 0 0 1 6.67 TOTAL 41 4 7 151 100.00% Table 6-Road Surface Condition Road Surface Condition 2011 2012 2013 Total % Dry 1 3 6 10 66.67 Wet 2 1 1 4 26.67 Snow/Slush 1 0 0 1 6.67 TOTAL 41 41 71 151 100.00% Table 7-Light Condition Light Condition 2011 2012 2013 Total % Daylight 2 1 5 8 53.33 Dark-Not Lighted 0 0 1 1 6.67 Dark-Lighted 2 3 1 6 40.00 TOTAL 41 41 7 151 100.00% From 1/12011 12:00:00 AM until 12131/2013 11:59:59 PM page 5 of 11 Report Generated 4/9/2015 8:45:00 AM Town of Greenwich Road/Route#735 KING ST NO 2 from 0.00 to 0.59 Table 8-Other Roadway Feature Other Roadway Feature 2011 2012 2013 Total % None 21 5 8 53.33 Intersection with Public Roadway 21 2 1 5 33.33 Intersection with Private Roadway 0 1 01 1 6.67 Intersection with Commercial Drive 0 0 1 1 1 6.67 TOTAL 4 4 71 15 100.00% Table 9-Construction or Maintenance Related Construction or Maintenance 2011 2012 2013 Total % Yes 01 0 0 0 0.00 No 4 4 7 15 100.00 TOTAL 4 4 7 '151 100.00% Table 10-Median Barrier Penetration Median Barrier Penetration 2011 2012 2013 Total % Full Penetration 0 0 0 01 0.00 Partial Penetration 0 0 0 01 0.00 No Penetration 0 0 0 0 0.00 Not Applicable 4 4 7 15 100.00 TOTAL 41 4 7 15 100.00% From 11112011 12:00:00 AM until 12/31/2013 11:59:59 PM page 6 of 11 Report Generated 4/9/2015 8:45:00 AM Town of Greenivich Road/Route#735 KING 5T IUD 2 from 0.00 to 0.59 Table 11 -Contributing Factor Corm tIng Factor 2014 2012 21113 T % Failed To Grant Right Of Way 0 1 0 1 6.67 Improper Passing Maneuver 0 1 0 1 6.67 Improper Lane Change 0 0 1 1 6.67 Fallowing Toa Closely 3 0 5 8 53.33 Drier Lost Control 1 1 1 3 20.00 Feil Asleep 0 1 01 1 6.67 TOTAL 41 9 71 15 100.00% From 1111201112:00.00 AM until 121312013 11:59:59 PM page 7 of 11 Report Generated 4192015 8:45:00 AM Town of Greenwich Road/Route#735 XING ST NO 2 from 0.00 to 0.59 Table 12-Typevf*o1llsion Type of Coffision 2011 2912 2413 TOW % Turning-Opposite Direction 0 1 0 1 6.67 Sideswipe-Same Direction 0 1 1 2 13.33 Rear-end 3 0 5 8 53.33 Fined Object 1 2 1 4 26.67 TOTAL 41 4 71 15 100.00% From 1/1/2011 12:00:00 AM until 12/31/2013 11:59:59 PM page 8 of 11 Report Generated 41912015 8:45:00 AM Town of Greenwich Road/Route#7351[ING 5T NO 2 from 0.00 to 0.59 Table U-Vehicle Type Vehicle Type 2611 2012 2013 Tem % Automobile 7 7 131 271 100.00 TOTAL 71 7 i3l 271 4WA0% From 1/1/2011 12:00:00 AM until 12/31/2013 11:59:59 PM page 9 of 11 Report Generated 4AJ/2015 8:45:00 AM Town of Greenwich Road/Route#735 KING ST NO 2 from 0.00 to 0.59 Table 14-Direction of AN Vehicles Direction of All Vehicles 2011 2012 2013 Total % North 3 4 5 12 44.44 South 4 3 8 15 55.56 East 0 0 0 0 0.00 West 0 0 0 01 0.00 Unknown 0 0 0 01 0.00 TOTAL 7 7 13 271 100.00% Table 15-Offending Vehicle Direcilm Offending Vehicle Direction 2011 2012 2013 Total % North 21 3 31 53.33 South 2 1 41 7 46.67 East 0 0 01 0.00 West 0 0 0 0 0.00 Unknown 01 0 0 0 0.00 TOTAL 41 41 7 151 100.00% From 1/12011 12:00.00 AM until 12131/2013 11:59:59 PM page 10 of 11 Report Generated 4132015 8:45:00 AM Town of Greenwich Road/Route#735 KING ST NO 2 from 0.00 to 0.59 Table 16-ObJ M Shuck and Loca*m Objects Struck and Location 2011 2012 2013 Total Off Road In On On Off Road Off Road On Gore Over and Roadway Shoulder, Shoulder, and and Median Area, Roadway Shoulder Right Left Shoulder, Shoulder, Divider Ramp Ahead Right Left Nose Bank,Ledge,Rock(Off Road) 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Highway Sign,Post,Delineator 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 a Tree 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 Utility Pole 0 3 1 4 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 TOTAL 1 6 1 8 0 0 0 0 7 1 0 0 0 From 1/12011 12:00:00 AM until 12/312013 11:59:59 PM page 11 of 11 Report Generated 4/9/2015 8:45.00 AM Town of Greenwich RoadlRoute#735 KING 5'T NO 2 from 0.00 to 0.59 Table 17-Total Injuries by Severity Total lr"nes by Severity 20111 2012 2(43 Toil % Total Fatal 0 0 0 0 0.00 Total A-Injury 0 1 1 2 25.00 Total B-injury G 2 2 4 50.00 Total C-Injury 2 0 0 2 1 5.00 TOTAL 2 3 31 81 100.00% From 1/12011 12:00:00 AM until 121312013 11:59:59 PM page 1 of 4 Report Generated 4/9/2015 8.47:06 AM Town of Greenwich Road/Route# 735 KING ST NO 2 from 0 00 to 0.59 Total of 15 accidents 1 to 12/31/2013 Accident • - Detail Report Date Town Road Mile Location DOT# Police Case# Contributing Lighting Surface weatirer Collision Type Description Factor Condition Condition Tue Feb-26-13 Greenwich KING ST NO 0.16 ?at 1073 King St 2060555 1300007439 Driver Lost Control Daylight Dry No Adverse Fixed Object 16:49 2 Condition Contrib. Direction Veh Type Maneuver Prefix Maneuver Suffix 1st/2nd Object Struck 1stl2nd Object Location Injuries Factor K A B C Total North Automobile None Apply Vehicle Going Straight Utility Pole Off Road and Shoulder, 0 1 0 0 1 Right Fri Jan-11-13 Greenwich KING ST NO 0 17 100 meters North 2048364 1300001257 Following Too Dark-Lighted Wet Rain Rear-end 19:33 2 of WILLOW RUN Closely RD(PVT) Contrib. Direction Veh Type Maneuver Prefix Maneuver Suffix 1st/2nd Object Struck 1stl2nd Object Location Injuries Factor K A B C Total North Automobile Vehicle Stopped For Vehicle Turning Left From Driveway 0 0 0 0 0 North Automobile Vehicle Slowing For Stopped Vehicle 0 0 0 0 0 Sat Jan-05-13 Greenwich KING ST NO 0.25 50 feet North of 2048434 1300000548 Following Too Dark-Not Dry No Adverse Rear-end 19:36 2 HETTIEFRED RD Closely Lighted Condition Contrib. Direction Veh Type Maneuver Prefix Maneuver Suffix 1st/2nd Object Struck 1st/2nd Object Location Injuries Factor K A B C Total South Automobile None Apply Vehicle Going Straight 0 0 0 0 0 South Automobile None Apply Vehicle Going Straight 0 0 0 0 0 Wed Feb-08-12 Greenwich KING ST NO 0 26 at HETTIEFRED 1839006 1200004472 Improper Passing Dark-Lighted Dry No Adverse Sideswipe- 23:47 2 RD Maneuver Condition Same Direction Contrib. Direction Veh Type Maneuver Prefix Maneuver Suffix 1st/2nd Object Struck 1st/2nd Object Location Injuries Factor K A B C Total North Automobile None Apply Vehicle Passing Same Direction on Utility Pole/Utility Pole Off Road and Shoulder, 0 0 1 0 1 Right Right/Off Road and Shoulder,Right North Automobile None Apply Vehicle Going Straight Tree Off Road and Shoulder, 0 1 0 0 1 Right From 1/12011 12:00:00 AM until 121312013 11:59:59 PM page 2 of 4 Report Generated 4/9/2015 8:47:06 AM Town of Greenwich Road/Route# 735 KING ST NO 2 from 0.00 to 0.59 Total of 15 accidents Date Town Road Mile Location DOT 0 Police Case ConftbuRNrp Llghtirig surkm Vlfeaaw CoMsbn Type Description Factor Condition Conation Sat Jan-22-11 Greenwich KING ST NO 0.28 87 feet S of 1752569 11-900108 Driver Lost Control Dark-Lighted Dry No Adverse Fixed Object 18:01 2 HETTIEFRED RD Condition Contrib. Direction Veh Type Maneuver Prefix Maneuver Suffix 1st/2nd Object Struck 1st/2nd Object Location Injuries Factor K A B C Total North Automobile None Apply Vehicle Negotiating Curve Highway Sign,Post,Delineator Off Road and Shoulder, 0 0 0 0 0 Right Tue Feb-01-11 Greenwich KING ST NO 0.28 100 feet S of 1759673 11-900160 Following Too Daylight Snow/Slush Snow Rear-end 7:41 2 HETTIEFRED RD Closely Contrib. Direction Veh Type Maneuver Prefix Maneuver Suffix 1st/2nd Object Struck 1st/2nd Object Location Injuries Factor K A B C Total North Automobile Vehicle Stopped For Traffic 0 0 0 0 0 North Automobile None Apply Vehicle Going Straight 0 0 0 0 0 Thu Nov-14-13 Greenwich KING ST NO 0.37 at BOWMAN DR 2133330 1300041274 Improper Lane Daylight Dry No Adverse Sideswipe- 9:19 2 NORTH Change Condition Same Direction Contrib. Direction Veh Type Maneuver Prefix Maneuver Suffix 1st/2nd Object Struck 1st/2nd Object Location Injuries Factor K A B C Total South Automobile None Apply Vehicle Changing Lane(s)to Right 0 0 0 0 0 South Automobile Vehicle Skidded Slowing or Vehicle Changing Lane(s)to Right 0 0 0 0 0 Stopping For Mon Aug-26-13 Greenwich KING ST NO 0.46 27 feet North of 2115200 1300031401 Following Too Daylight Dry No Adverse Rear-end 14:03 2 STONEHEDGE Closely Condition DR NORTH Contrib. Direction Veh Type Maneuver Prefix Maneuver Suffix 1st/2nd Object Struck 1st/2nd Object Location Injuries Factor K A B C Total South Automobile Vehicle Slowing For Traffic 0 0 1 0 1 South Automobile None Apply Vehicle Going Straight 0 0 1 0 1 From 1/12011 12:00:00 AM until 12/31/2013 11:59:59 PM page 3 of 4 Report Generated 4/9/2015 8:47:06 AM Town of Greenwich Road/Route# 735 KING ST NO 2 from 0.00 to 0.59 Total of 15 accidents Date Town Road Mile Location DOT d Police Case S Contrwwft UgItNtlg Surface Weather COMlslatt Type Description Factor Condition Condition Sat Oct-06-12 Greenwich KING ST NO 0.48 30 feet South of 2005990 1200032855 Fell Asleep Dark-Lighted Dry No Adverse Fixed Object 4:36 2 STONEHEDGE Condition DR NORTH Contrib. Direction Veh Type Maneuver Prefix Maneuver Suffix 1st/2nd Object Struck 1st/2nd Object Location Injuries Factor K A B C Total * South Automobile None Apply Vehicle Going Straight Utility Pole Off Road and Shoulder, 0 0 1 0 1 Left Mon May-27-13 Greenwich KING ST NO 0.49 50 feet North of 2088452 1300019202 Following Too Daylight Dry No Adverse Rear-end 19:11 2 ANDERSON HILL Closely Condition RD Contrib. Direction Veh Type Maneuver Prefix Maneuver Suffix 1sV2nd Object Struck 1st/2nd Object Location Injuries Factor K A B C Total South Automobile Vehicle Slowing For Traffic 0 0 0 0 0 South Automobile None Apply Vehicle Going Straight 0 0 0 0 0 Sat Apr-23-11 Greenwich KING ST NO 0.50 at ANDERSON 1766536 11-900474 Following Too Daylight Wet Rain Rear-end 12:17 2 HILL RD Closely Contrib. Direction Veh Type Maneuver Prefix Maneuver Suffix 1st/2nd Object Struck 1st/2nd Object Location Injuries Factor K A B C Total South Automobile Vehicle Stopped For Traffic Signal 0 0 0 1 1 South Automobile Vehicle Skidded Slowing or Stopped Vehicle 0 0 0 0 0 Stopping For Sat Aug-27-11 Greenwich KING ST NO 0.50 at ANDERSON 1818775 1100038182 Following Too Dark-Lighted Wet Rain Rear-end 20:12 2 HILL RD Closely Contrib. Direction Veh Type Maneuver Prefix Maneuver Suffix 1st/2nd Object Struck 1st/2nd Object Location Injuries Factor K A B C Total South Automobile Vehicle Stopped For Traffic 0 0 0 0 0 South Automobile Vehicle Skidded Slowing or Stopped Vehicle 0 0 0 1 1 Stopping For From 1/12011 12:00:00 AM until 12/312013 11:59:59 PM page 4 of 4 Report Generated 4/9/2015 8:47:06 AM Town of Greenwich Road/Route# 735 KING ST NO 2 from 0.00 to 0.59 Total of 15 accidents Date Town Road Mlle Location DOT X Pdke Case 0Coaltributing Wo" INW11140 CONMAM Type Description Factor Condillillim OondMa Thu Apr-26-12 Greenwich KING ST NO 0.50 at ANDERSON 1853070 1200013182 Failed To Grant Dark-Lighted Wet Rain Turning- 20:11 2 HILL RD Right Of Way Opposite Direction Factor Struck Contrib. Direction Veh Type Maneuver Prefix Maneuver Suffix 1sV2nd Object Stk 1sV2nd Object Location Injuries South Automobile None Apply Vehicle Going Straight K A B C Total 0 0 0 0 0 North Automobile None Apply Vehicle Turning Left from Proper 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Fri Sep-14-12 Greenwich KING ST NO 0 50 at ANDERSON 2007993 1200030104 Driver Lost Control Daylight Dry No Adverse Fixed Object 10:22 2 HILL RD Condition Contrib. Direction Veh Type Maneuver Prefix Maneuver Suffix Factor 1sU2nd Object Struck 1sU2nd Object Location Injuries K A B C Total North Automobile None Apply Vehicle Turning Left from Proper Tree/Bank,Ledge,Rock(Off Road) Off Road and Shoulder, 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Right/Off Road and South Automobile None APPIY Vehicle Turning Right from Proper Shoulder,Right Lane 0 0 0 0 0 Fri Sep-13-13 Greenwich KING ST NO 0.51 45 feet South of 2126336 1300033549 Following Too Daylight Dry No Adverse Rear-end 13:42 2 ANDERSON HILL Closely Condition RD Contrib. Direction Veh Type Maneuver Prefix Maneuver Suffix 1sU2nd Object Struck Factor 1sU2nd Object Location Injuries North Automobile Vehicle Stopped For Traffic K A B C Total 0 0 0 0 0 North Automobile Vehicle Skidded Slowing or Stopped Vehicle 0 0 0 0 0 Stopping For V FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. PLANNING, TRANSPORTATION, ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT RYE, NEW YORK FAIRFIELD, CONNECTICUT DAVID H. STOLMAN MEMORANDUM AICP, PP PRESIDENT EXICHAEL A.ECUTIVE GALANTE To: Gary Zuckerman, Chairman, and the VICE PRESIDENT Planning Board of the Village of Rye Brook 35o THEO.FREMD AVE. RYE, NEW YORK 1058o Date: May 13, 2015 914 967-6540 FAX: 914 967-6615 CONNECTICUT Subject: Reckson Executive Parr, Phase 3 — 203 255-3100 Applications for Zoning Code and Zoning HUDSON VALLEY Map Amendments, and a PUD Concept Plan 845 297-6056 LONG ISLAND 5i6 364-4544 As requested, we reviewed revised plans for zoning code and zoning map www.fpciark.com amendments, and approval of a PUD Concept Plan submitted by email@fpclark.com Buckingham Partners and Sun Homes on behalf of Reckson Operating Partnership LP, property owner, to amend Section 250-7 E., Planned Unit Development District (PUD), of the Village Code, change the Village Zoning Map to add Reckson Executive Park Phase 3 into the amended PUD District, and approve a Concept Plan for construction of 110 attached and detached single-family homes, a community building and swimming pool for the use of development residents, parking, roadways and other related infrastructure instead of the 280,000 square-foot office building and associated parking already approved, but not built, on property known as Reckson Executive Park Phase 3, International Drive, Section 129.25, Block 1, Lot 1 on the Town of Rye Tax Map. Property Description The 31.5-acre property, located at 1100 King Street in the Reckson Executive Park, is within the OB-1 Zoning District and the Z-1 Instrument Approach Zone of Westchester County Airport. The Phase 3 building lot is located west of the current terminus of International Drive and extends generally west to the Blind Brook. The western property line of the subject lot follows the course of the Blind Brook for the most part; however, a 0.5- acre portion of the lot is within the Town/Village of Harrison. The lot has an existing approved site plan and is partially developed with storm water management and water quality facilities that are under construction and mostly complete, which are part of the existing office building approval. is Generally, the rest of the lot is naturally vegetated. FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. PLANNING, TRANSPORTATION, ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT RYE, NEW YORK FAIRFIELD, CONNECTICUT The existing special permit and site plan approvals for office development have undergone a series of amendments and extensions of approval since the original approval in 1990. The current special permit, site plan and wetlands permit approvals for a 280,000 square-foot office building and 1,120 parking spaces were extended in December, 2010 by the Board of Trustees and are valid until December 14, 2015. Project Description The Applicant proposes to construct 100 market-rate, attached and detached, single- family homes and 10 semi-attached, single-family, affordable homes that would qualify under the Rye Brook FAH regulations as AFFH homes, a community building, a swimming pool, and associated roads, parking areas, and other infrastructure on the Reckson Phase 3 lot. Construction also would include extension of the western end of International Drive, location of new streets within the development, an updated stormwater management plan, grading and removal of existing vegetation, extension of utilities, street lighting, driveways, pedestrian walkways, parking areas for visitors, landscape plantings, and signage. To make it possible to build the development and approve the proposed Concept Plan submitted, the Applicant submitted a petition to change the Rye Brook Zoning Map to put the Phase 3 lot into the Planned Unit Development District (PUD), and amend Section 250-7 E. of the Village Code regarding PUD development with respect to setbacks, density, street frontage, and the gross floor area of attached garages and walk- out basements. The zoning code and zoning map amendment petition and the Concept Plan were referred to the Planning Board by the Board of Trustees on February 24, 2015 for a report and recommendations. Review We reviewed a petition, applications, an EAF, and revised plans submitted by the Applicant that include the following items: 1. Full Environmental Assessment Form Part land EAF Mapper Summary 2. Letter to the Chairman and Planning Board prepared by Cuddy and Feder, LLP, White Plains, N.Y. dated May 7, 2015 3. Letter and Petition to the Mayor and Board of Trustees prepared by Cuddy and Feder, LLP, White Plains, N.Y. dated February 10, 2015 2 FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. PLANNING, TRANSPORTATION, ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT RYE, NEW YORK FAIRFIELD, CONNECTICUT 4. School Aged Children, Sun Homes, Rye Brook prepared by Divney, Tung, Schwalbe , LLP, White Plains, N.Y. no date 5. Revised Rendered Illustrative Plan, Affordable Home Plans and Elevations, illustrative plan prepared by Divney, Tung, Schwalbe , LLP, White Plains, N.Y., no date 6. Rendered Illustrative Plan, Home Plans and Elevations, illustrative plan prepared by Divney, Tung, Schwalbe , LLP, White Plains, N.Y., no date 7. Memorandum and Revised Traffic Impact Study, prepared by Maser Consulting, P.A., Hawthorne, N.Y. dated April 15, 2015 8. Traffic Impact Study, prepared by Maser Consulting, P.A., Hawthorne, N.Y. dated January 14, 2015 9. Land Title Survey prepared by Joseph R. Link, Land Surveyor, Mahopac, N.Y. dated March 23, 2002, updated January 21, 2015 10.Memorandum to the Village Engineer and the Planning Board prepared by Dolph Rotfeld Engineering , P.C., Tarrytown, N.Y. dated March 3, 2015 11.Memorandum to William Null, Esq. prepared by the Rye Brook Building and Fire Inspector, dated May 7, 2015 12.Engineer's Plans, prepared by Divney, Tung, Schwalbe, LLP, White Plains, N.Y.: Sheet Number Sheet Title Date SP-1.0 Conceptual Site Plan 05/07/15 SP-1.0 Conceptual Site Plan 02/09/15 SP-2.0 Conceptual Grading and Utility Plan 02/09/15 Please note that our review is limited to planning, zoning and environmental issues. Comments In addition to the unresolved comments in our March 9, 2015 planning memorandum and our March 31, 2015 traffic memorandum, we have the following planning comments regarding the revised building design of the 10 affordable units and the revised PUD Concept Plan: 1. Revised Affordable Unit Design. The revised design for the affordable units in a two-unit side by side arrangement that from the street appears to be a single family home is a creative solution to make the affordable units indistinguishable from the market-rate units. The proposed configuration also effectively handles 3 FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. PLANNING, TRANSPORTATION, ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT RYE, NEW YORK FAIRFIELD, CONNECTICUT the size difference between the affordable and the market-rate homes and locates the garage for each of the two units in the semi attached two-family homes. We believe this design meets the Village Code requirements regarding the design of AFFH units. 2. Revised PUD Concept Plan. The revised PUD Concept Plan layout provides at least a 50-foot setback from the Phase 1 and Phase 2 lots for all homes , which is an improvement of the original PUD concept plan layout. The additional setback was achieved by re-aligning the adjacent internal roadway slightly. However, it is our opinion that the alignment of the road should be further adjusted to allow a full car- length of driveway in the front yards of the affordable homes so that a car can pull completely into the driveway and be safely off the roadway to park for unloading occupants and items from the car. Currently the homes are located too close to the roadway. Regarding the location of the affordable homes we continue to recommend that the affordable homes should be located throughout the development and not clustered together. 3. Traffic and Parking. Our traffic engineers are reviewing the revised Traffic Impact Study and will provide traffic and parking comments to the Village Boards in a separate memorandum. We look forward to discussion with the Planning Board regarding the application. Marilyn Timpone Mohamed, ASLA, AICP Senior Associate/Planning/Environment cc: Honorable Mayor and the Village Board of Trustees Christopher Bradbury, Village Administrator Michal Nowak, Superintendent of Public Works/Village Engineer Philip A. Butler, Esq., Village Attorney William S. Null, Esq., for the Applicant Gerhard M. Schwalbe, P.E. for the Applicant J.IDOCS215001Rye Brook153R.662.Sun Honies.Reckron Pha.ce 3 Aneendnaentc.,Wenio2.nitni.docni 4 V FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. PLANNING, TRANSPORTATION, ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT RYE, NEW YORK FAIRFIELD, CONNECTICUT DAVID H. STOLMAN MEMORANDUM AICP, PP PRESIDENT EXICHAEL A.ECUTIVE GALANTE To: Gary Zuckerman, Chairman, and the VICE PRESIDENT Planning Board of the Village of Rye Brook 35o THEO.FREMD AVE. RYE, NEW YORK 1058o Date: May 13, 2015 914 967-6540 FAX: 914 967-6615 CONNECTICUT Subject: Reckson Executive Parr, Phase 3 — 203 255-3100 Applications for Zoning Code and Zoning HUDSON VALLEY Map Amendments, and a PUD Concept Plan 845 297-6056 LONG ISLAND 5i6 364-4544 As requested, we reviewed revised plans for zoning code and zoning map www.fpciark.com amendments, and approval of a PUD Concept Plan submitted by email@fpclark.com Buckingham Partners and Sun Homes on behalf of Reckson Operating Partnership LP, property owner, to amend Section 250-7 E., Planned Unit Development District (PUD), of the Village Code, change the Village Zoning Map to add Reckson Executive Park Phase 3 into the amended PUD District, and approve a Concept Plan for construction of 110 attached and detached single-family homes, a community building and swimming pool for the use of development residents, parking, roadways and other related infrastructure instead of the 280,000 square-foot office building and associated parking already approved, but not built, on property known as Reckson Executive Park Phase 3, International Drive, Section 129.25, Block 1, Lot 1 on the Town of Rye Tax Map. Property Description The 31.5-acre property, located at 1100 King Street in the Reckson Executive Park, is within the OB-1 Zoning District and the Z-1 Instrument Approach Zone of Westchester County Airport. The Phase 3 building lot is located west of the current terminus of International Drive and extends generally west to the Blind Brook. The western property line of the subject lot follows the course of the Blind Brook for the most part; however, a 0.5- acre portion of the lot is within the Town/Village of Harrison. The lot has an existing approved site plan and is partially developed with storm water management and water quality facilities that are under construction and mostly complete, which are part of the existing office building approval. is Generally, the rest of the lot is naturally vegetated. FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. PLANNING, TRANSPORTATION, ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT RYE, NEW YORK FAIRFIELD, CONNECTICUT The existing special permit and site plan approvals for office development have undergone a series of amendments and extensions of approval since the original approval in 1990. The current special permit, site plan and wetlands permit approvals for a 280,000 square-foot office building and 1,120 parking spaces were extended in December, 2010 by the Board of Trustees and are valid until December 14, 2015. Project Description The Applicant proposes to construct 100 market-rate, attached and detached, single- family homes and 10 semi-attached, single-family, affordable homes that would qualify under the Rye Brook FAH regulations as AFFH homes, a community building, a swimming pool, and associated roads, parking areas, and other infrastructure on the Reckson Phase 3 lot. Construction also would include extension of the western end of International Drive, location of new streets within the development, an updated stormwater management plan, grading and removal of existing vegetation, extension of utilities, street lighting, driveways, pedestrian walkways, parking areas for visitors, landscape plantings, and signage. To make it possible to build the development and approve the proposed Concept Plan submitted, the Applicant submitted a petition to change the Rye Brook Zoning Map to put the Phase 3 lot into the Planned Unit Development District (PUD), and amend Section 250-7 E. of the Village Code regarding PUD development with respect to setbacks, density, street frontage, and the gross floor area of attached garages and walk- out basements. The zoning code and zoning map amendment petition and the Concept Plan were referred to the Planning Board by the Board of Trustees on February 24, 2015 for a report and recommendations. Review We reviewed a petition, applications, an EAF, and revised plans submitted by the Applicant that include the following items: 1. Full Environmental Assessment Form Part land EAF Mapper Summary 2. Letter to the Chairman and Planning Board prepared by Cuddy and Feder, LLP, White Plains, N.Y. dated May 7, 2015 3. Letter and Petition to the Mayor and Board of Trustees prepared by Cuddy and Feder, LLP, White Plains, N.Y. dated February 10, 2015 2 FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. PLANNING, TRANSPORTATION, ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT RYE, NEW YORK FAIRFIELD, CONNECTICUT 4. School Aged Children, Sun Homes, Rye Brook prepared by Divney, Tung, Schwalbe , LLP, White Plains, N.Y. no date 5. Revised Rendered Illustrative Plan, Affordable Home Plans and Elevations, illustrative plan prepared by Divney, Tung, Schwalbe , LLP, White Plains, N.Y., no date 6. Rendered Illustrative Plan, Home Plans and Elevations, illustrative plan prepared by Divney, Tung, Schwalbe , LLP, White Plains, N.Y., no date 7. Memorandum and Revised Traffic Impact Study, prepared by Maser Consulting, P.A., Hawthorne, N.Y. dated April 15, 2015 8. Traffic Impact Study, prepared by Maser Consulting, P.A., Hawthorne, N.Y. dated January 14, 2015 9. Land Title Survey prepared by Joseph R. Link, Land Surveyor, Mahopac, N.Y. dated March 23, 2002, updated January 21, 2015 10.Memorandum to the Village Engineer and the Planning Board prepared by Dolph Rotfeld Engineering , P.C., Tarrytown, N.Y. dated March 3, 2015 11.Memorandum to William Null, Esq. prepared by the Rye Brook Building and Fire Inspector, dated May 7, 2015 12.Engineer's Plans, prepared by Divney, Tung, Schwalbe, LLP, White Plains, N.Y.: Sheet Number Sheet Title Date SP-1.0 Conceptual Site Plan 05/07/15 SP-1.0 Conceptual Site Plan 02/09/15 SP-2.0 Conceptual Grading and Utility Plan 02/09/15 Please note that our review is limited to planning, zoning and environmental issues. Comments In addition to the unresolved comments in our March 9, 2015 planning memorandum and our March 31, 2015 traffic memorandum, we have the following planning comments regarding the revised building design of the 10 affordable units and the revised PUD Concept Plan: 1. Revised Affordable Unit Design. The revised design for the affordable units in a two-unit side by side arrangement that from the street appears to be a single family home is a creative solution to make the affordable units indistinguishable from the market-rate units. The proposed configuration also effectively handles 3 FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. PLANNING, TRANSPORTATION, ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT RYE, NEW YORK FAIRFIELD, CONNECTICUT the size difference between the affordable and the market-rate homes and locates the garage for each of the two units in the semi attached two-family homes. We believe this design meets the Village Code requirements regarding the design of AFFH units. 2. Revised PUD Concept Plan. The revised PUD Concept Plan layout provides at least a 50-foot setback from the Phase 1 and Phase 2 lots for all homes , which is an improvement of the original PUD concept plan layout. The additional setback was achieved by re-aligning the adjacent internal roadway slightly. However, it is our opinion that the alignment of the road should be further adjusted to allow a full car- length of driveway in the front yards of the affordable homes so that a car can pull completely into the driveway and be safely off the roadway to park for unloading occupants and items from the car. Currently the homes are located too close to the roadway. Regarding the location of the affordable homes we continue to recommend that the affordable homes should be located throughout the development and not clustered together. 3. Traffic and Parking. Our traffic engineers are reviewing the revised Traffic Impact Study and will provide traffic and parking comments to the Village Boards in a separate memorandum. We look forward to discussion with the Planning Board regarding the application. Marilyn Timpone Mohamed, ASLA, AICP Senior Associate/Planning/Environment cc: Honorable Mayor and the Village Board of Trustees Christopher Bradbury, Village Administrator Michal Nowak, Superintendent of Public Works/Village Engineer Philip A. Butler, Esq., Village Attorney William S. Null, Esq., for the Applicant Gerhard M. Schwalbe, P.E. for the Applicant J.IDOCS215001Rye Brook153R.662.Sun Honies.Reckron Pha.ce 3 Aneendnaentc.,Wenio2.nitni.docni 4 V FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. PLANNING, TRANSPORTATION, ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT RYE, NEW YORK FAIRFIELD, CONNECTICUT DAVID H. STOLMAN MEMORANDUM AICP, PP PRESIDENT EXICHAEL A.ECUTIVE GALANTE To: Gary Zuckerman, Chairman, and the VICE PRESIDENT Planning Board of the Village of Rye Brook 35o THEO.FREMD AVE. RYE, NEW YORK 1058o Date: May 29, 2015 914 967-6540 FAX: 914 967-6615 CONNECTICUT Subject: Reckson Executive Parr, Phase 3 — 203 255-3100 Applications for Zoning Code and Zoning HUDSON VALLEY Map Amendments, and a PUD Concept Plan 845 297-6056 LONG ISLAND 5i6 364-4544 As requested, we reviewed revised plans for zoning code and zoning map www.fpciark.com amendments, and approval of a PUD Concept Plan submitted by email@fpclark.com Buckingham Partners and Sun Homes on behalf of Reckson Operating Partnership LP, property owner, to amend Section 250-7 E., Planned Unit Development District (PUD), of the Village Code, change the Village Zoning Map to add Reckson Executive Park Phase 3 into the amended PUD District, and approve a Concept Plan for construction of 110 attached and detached single-family homes, a community building and swimming pool for the use of development residents, parking, roadways and other related infrastructure instead of the 280,000 square-foot office building and associated parking already approved, but not built, on property known as Reckson Executive Park Phase 3, International Drive, Section 129.25, Block 1, Lot 1 on the Town of Rye Tax Map. Property Description The 31.5-acre property, located at 1100 King Street in the Reckson Executive Park, is within the OB-1 Zoning District and the Z-1 Instrument Approach Zone of Westchester County Airport. The Phase 3 building lot is located west of the current terminus of International Drive and extends generally west to the Blind Brook. The western property line of the subject lot follows the course of the Blind Brook for the most part; however, a 0.5- acre portion of the lot is within the Town/Village of Harrison. The lot has an existing approved site plan and is partially developed with storm water management and water quality facilities that are under construction and mostly complete and part of the existing office building approval. Generally, the rest of the lot is naturally vegetated. FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. PLANNING, TRANSPORTATION, ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT RYE, NEW YORK FAIRFIELD, CONNECTICUT The existing special permit and site plan approvals for office development have undergone a series of amendments and extensions of approval since the original approval in 1990. The current special permit, site plan and wetlands permit approvals for a 280,000 square-foot office building and 1,120 parking spaces were extended in December, 2010 by the Board of Trustees and are valid until December 14, 2015. Project Description The Applicant proposes to construct 100 market-rate, attached and detached, single- family homes and 10 semi-attached, single-family, affordable homes that would qualify under the Rye Brook FAH regulations as AFFH homes, a community building, a swimming pool, and associated roads, parking areas, and other infrastructure on the Reckson Phase 3 lot. Construction also would include extension of the western end of International Drive, location of new streets within the development, an updated stormwater management plan, grading and removal of existing vegetation, extension of utilities, street lighting, driveways, pedestrian walkways, parking areas for visitors, landscape plantings, and signage. To make it possible to build the development and approve the proposed Concept Plan submitted, the Applicant submitted a petition to change the Rye Brook Zoning Map to put the Phase 3 lot into the Planned Unit Development District (PUD), and amend Section 250-7 E. of the Village Code regarding PUD development with respect to setbacks, density, street frontage, and the gross floor area of attached garages and walk- out basements. The zoning code and zoning map amendment petition and the Concept Plan were referred to the Planning Board by the Board of Trustees on February 24, 2015 for a report and recommendations. Review We reviewed a petition, applications, an EAF, and revised plans submitted by the Applicant that include the following items: 1. Full Environmental Assessment Form Part land EAF Mapper Summary 2. Letter to the Chairman and Planning Board prepared by Cuddy and Feder, LLP, White Plains, N.Y. dated May 27, 2015 3. Letter to the Chairman and Planning Board prepared by Cuddy and Feder, LLP, White Plains, N.Y. dated May 7, 2015 2 FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. PLANNING, TRANSPORTATION, ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT RYE, NEW YORK FAIRFIELD, CONNECTICUT 4. Letter and Petition to the Mayor and Board of Trustees prepared by Cuddy and Feder, LLP, White Plains, N.Y. dated February 10, 2015 5. School Aged Children, Sun Homes, Rye Brook prepared by Divney, Tung, Schwalbe , LLP, White Plains, N.Y. no date 6. Revised Rendered Illustrative Plan, Affordable Home Plans and Elevations, illustrative plan prepared by Divney, Tung, Schwalbe , LLP, White Plains, N.Y., no date 7. Rendered Illustrative Plan, Home Plans and Elevations, illustrative plan prepared by Divney, Tung, Schwalbe , LLP, White Plains, N.Y., no date 8. Memorandum and Accident Data, prepared by Maser Consulting, P.A., Hawthorne, N.Y. dated May 26, 2015 9. Memorandum and Revised Traffic Impact Study, prepared by Maser Consulting, P.A., Hawthorne, N.Y. dated April 15, 2015 10.Traffic Impact Study, prepared by Maser Consulting, P.A., Hawthorne, N.Y. dated January 14, 2015 11.Land Title Survey prepared by Joseph R. Link, Land Surveyor, Mahopac, N.Y. dated March 23, 2002, updated January 21, 2015 12.Memorandum to the Village Engineer and the Planning Board prepared by Dolph Rotfeld Engineering , P.C., Tarrytown, N.Y. dated March 3, 2015 13.ESTF Review Memorandum to William Null, Esq. prepared by the Rye Brook Building and Fire Inspector, dated May 7, 2015 14.Engineer's Plans, prepared by Divney, Tung, Schwalbe, LLP, White Plains, N.Y.: Sheet Number Sheet Title Date SP-1.0 Conceptual Site Plan 05/27/15 SP-2.0 Conceptual Grading and Utility Plan 02/09/15 No number Site Sections 05/27/15 Please note that our review is limited to planning, zoning and environmental issues. Comments We have the following planning comments regarding the revised PUD Concept Plan: 1. Revised PUD Concept Plan Layout. The revised PUD Concept Plan was adjusted to allow 20 feet of driveway in the front yards of the affordable homes to allow a car to pull completely into the driveway. 3 FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. PLANNING, TRANSPORTATION, ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT RYE, NEW YORK FAIRFIELD, CONNECTICUT Regarding the location of the affordable homes we continue to recommend that the affordable homes should be located throughout the development and not clustered together. 2. Traffic and Parking. Our traffic engineers are reviewing the revised PUD Concept Plan and the additional information provided by Maser Consulting. Traffic, parking and concept plan layout comments will be provided to the Village Boards in a separate memorandum. 3. Community Services. An analysis and estimate of the number of school-age children that would be generated by the Sun Homes project indicates that a total number of approximately 50 children are expected to reside in the new development. To calculate the number of children who can be expected to go to public school, the analysis uses the actual school-district student population statistics to calculate that the percentage of the total number of school-age children in the district attending the Blind Brook/Rye Union Free School District schools is 92%. In the case of the Sun Homes project, this would be 46 children. The study results provided by the Applicant were achieved using accepted methodology and assumptions. Use of the specific percentage of children attending public school in the Blind Brook/Rye UFSD provides a more accurate anticipated number of children than use of the Rutgers Study standard of 73% of all school-age children expected to attend public school. The unresolved comments from our March 9, 2015 planning memorandum that should be responded to are included as follows: 4. Zoning. The zoning petition submitted requests a zoning map change to place the Phase 3 lot into the PUD district. In addition, the petition requests amendment of Section 250-7 E., the PUD regulations, to include the allowable number of units per acre and the allowable gross floor area per acre. The Applicant has indicated that the proposed density of the project is 3.5 units per acre. However, the Applicant has not provided the gross floor areas of all the types of units and the total gross floor area per acre. The Applicant has indicated that the stated gross floor areas of each type of the market rate units of 3,300, 2,800, and 2,350 square feet do not include the gross floor areas of walk-out basements and attached garages. The Applicant should provide the gross floor areas of all the building types proposed and include the gross floor areas of walkout basements and garages in the calculation to enable 4 FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. PLANNING, TRANSPORTATION, ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT RYE, NEW YORK FAIRFIELD, CONNECTICUT the Boards to understand the proposed sizes of the homes as calculated by the Village Code. 5. PUD Alteration Guidelines. The guidelines for inevitable future modifications to the homes and the grounds surrounding the homes, including decks, patios, driveways, etc., should be developed and reviewed as part of the Concept Plan approval process. 6. PUD Concept Plan. Section 250-7 E(4)(a)[1] includes a list of all the items required on the Concept Plan and the written statement. The Concept Plan should be revised to provide all the requirements of the referenced section, including the dimensions of all required and requested setbacks, the limits of the regulated wetland buffer of the Blind Brook, the limits of flood plains and floodways, the locations and limits of all easements, the dimensions of all roadway widths, and pedestrian circulation. We recommend that the written statement also be revised to include all the information required in the referenced section, including the type of ownership, etc. 7. Wetlands. The EAF states that the site plan submitted includes completion of the stormwater detention basins and the water quality basins that were approved for office development. The Applicant has also indicated, during earlier meetings with the Planning Board that the current basins will be modified and updated to become part of the new stormwater management plan. Any new work within the existing wetland basins or the wetland buffer of the Blind Brook required by the PUD Concept Plan and an approved PUD site plan would require compliance with the Village Code regulations regarding wetlands, and the approval of a wetland permit during the site plan review process. 8. Concept Grading Plan. The disturbance of existing steep slopes and the creation of new steep slopes on the property would require compliance with the Village Code regulations regarding steep slopes, and the approval of a Steep Slopes Work Permit during the site plan approval process. 9. EAF. The EAF includes an error that should be corrected. The answer to Section D.3.b. should be "No." The Applicant should provide evidence that the potential environmental impacts related to construction, including the length of time of construction, public safety, noise, vibration, soil and erosion impacts, air quality impacts, and traffic would 5 FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. PLANNING, TRANSPORTATION, ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT RYE, NEW YORK FAIRFIELD, CONNECTICUT be reduced or eliminated by a construction logistics and management plan, a draft of which should be submitted for review. 10.Visual Impacts. The removal of existing vegetation, grading of the lot and construction of the new homes may create visual impacts to views of the property from the surrounding residential neighborhoods of Bellefair and Doral Green. Evidence of the proposed views from residential receptors surrounding the new development and any proposed mitigation measures or efforts to protect and preserve existing vegetation should be submitted during the site plan review process. We look forward to discussion with the Planning Board regarding the application. Marilyn Timpone Mohamed, ASLA, AICP Senior Associate/Planning/Environment cc: Honorable Mayor and the Village Board of Trustees Christopher Bradbury, Village Administrator Michal Nowak, Superintendent of Public Works/Village Engineer Philip A. Butler, Esq., Village Attorney William S. Null, Esq., for the Applicant Gerhard M. Schwalbe, P.E. for the Applicant J•IDOCS215001Rye Brook153R.hh2.Sz:n Homes.Reciccon Pha.ce 3 Aneendnaentc.Menio3.nitm.docm 6 V FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. PLANNING, TRANSPORTATION, ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT RYE, NEW YORK FAIRFIELD,CONNECTICUT DAVID H. STOLMAN MEMORANDUM AICP,PP PRESIDENT MICHAEL A. GALANTE To: Gary Zuckerman, Chairman, and the EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT Planning g y Board of the Village of Rye Brook 35o THEO.FREMDAVE. Date: June 1 2015 RYE, NEW YORK 10580 914 967-6540 FAX: 914 967-6615 Subject: Reckson Executive Park, Phase 3, Village of Rye Brook, CONNECTICUT 203 255-3100 New York—Review of Traffic Impact Study (538.662) HUDSON VALLEY 845 297-6056 LONG ISLAND We are in receipt of the memorandum prepared by the Applicant's Traffic 5i6 364-4544 Consultant and dated May 26, 2015. This memorandum specifically WWW.fpciark.com responds to comments prepared by our office and dated May 19, 2015. email@fpdarl"om A review of the accident data and the results of the Traffic Impact Analysis, as presented by the Applicant, are acceptable to this office. Regarding comments related to the Site Plan, the Applicant has modified the parking layout near the entrance to the subject property from the adjacent office park and this is acceptable. The Applicant has noted that the inclusion of a roundabout is not feasible. Therefore, our only remaining comment is consideration of eliminating short dead-end aisles which, based on the Applicant's input and our further review of the Site Plan, indicates that there is no feasible option to modify these dead-end aisles to provide a turnaround. We will accept this finding, but will investigate it further during Site Plan review. Michael A. Galante Executive Vice President cc: Honorable Mayor and the Village Board of Trustees Christopher Bradbury, Village Administrator Michal Nowak, Superintendent of Public Works/Village Engineer Philip A. Butler, Esq., Village Attorney William S. Null Esq., for the Applicant - Gerhard M. Schwalbe, P.E., for the Applicant g:A538.662 sun homes at reckson executive park\word\sun I5-OOO.mag.docx:ev:td Y 1 RYE BROOK PLANNING BOARD W CHAIRMAN'S MEMORANDUM FOR THE MEETING OF: June 11, 2015 AGENDA ITEM: Review of a Site Plan Application by Buckingham Partners/ Sun Homes for a Planned Unit Development with a Fair and Affordable Housing component located at 1100 King Street Rye Brook, NY parcel ID 129.25-1-1 SUGGESTED ACTION(S): Possible Report and Recommendation BACKGROUND: The Applicant proposes to construct 100 market-rate, attached and detached, single-family homes and 10 attached, single-family, affordable homes that would qualify under the Rye Brook FAH regulations as AFFH homes, a community building, a swimming pool, and associated roads, parking areas, and other infrastructure on the Reckson Phase 3 lot. It will be necessary to re-zone the property from OB-1 to PUD and review the PUD Concept Plan. The Application has been amended in several respects, including full depth driveways leading to attached, rather than detached garages. Please review the cover letter of the Applicant's attorney, the Planning Memorandum, and the draft Report and Recommendation. June 11, 2015 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SUBMISSION OF A REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE RYE BROOK BOARD OF TRUSTEES ON AN APPLICATION BY BUCKINGHAM PARTNERS/SUN HOMES FOR APPROVAL OF A CONCEPT PLAN, ZONE CHANGE AND ZONING TEXT AMENDMENTS FOR A RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY OF 110 SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1100 KING STREET BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rye Brook Planning Board hereby adopts the attached Report and Recommendation to the Rye Brook Board of Trustees on an application by Buckingham Partners/Sun Homes for approval of a Concept Plan, zone change and zoning text amendment for a residential community of 110 single-family dwelling units on real property located at 1100 King Street. On a motion by , second by , Mr. Michael Nowak, Village Engineer, called the roll: APPROVING THE REFERRAL RESOLUTION: Ayes: Nays: Abstain: Excused: ACCURSO, GOODMAN, GRZAN, MORLINO, SCHOEN, TARTAGLIA, ZUCKERMAN REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION FROM THE RYE BROOK PLANNING BOARD TO THE RYE BROOK BOARD OF TRUSTEES ON AN APPLICATION BY BUCKINGHAM PARTNERS/SUN HOMES FOR APPROVAL OF A CONCEPT PLAN, ZONE CHANGE AND ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT FOR A RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY OF 110 SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1100 KING STREET I. APPLICATION OVERVIEW The Rye Brook Board of Trustees (the "BOT") is currently considering an application by Buckingham Partners/Sun Homes ("Applicant") for approval of a PUD Concept Plan, zone change and zoning text amendment for a residential community consisting of 110 dwelling units (the "Project") on real property located at 1100 King Street (the "Property"). Specifically, the Applicant wishes to construct a residential community on Parcel 129.25-1-1, located directly behind the Reckson Executive Park on King Street, currently in the OB-1 Zoning District. The development will include 100 attached and detached market rate dwellings, 10 affordable housing units as well as a pool, club house, streets, on-street parking areas, communal open space and storm water retention areas. A local trail network is also anticipated as part of the Project and will be presented to the Village during the formal Site Plan application process. To facilitate the Project, the Applicant requests that the Board of Trustees re-zone the Property from the OB-1 to the PUD Zoning District and that the PUD zoning regulations be amended to allow the Board of Trustees to alter or waive certain floor area and buffer zone requirements to allow greater housing density for the Project than would otherwise be permitted. Proposed text changes were submitted to the Village on pages 4- 5 of the letter from William S. Null, Esq., dated February 10, 2015. On February 24, 2015, the BOT referred the application to the Planning Board for consideration and for a report and recommendation thereon pursuant to Section 209-3 of the Village Code. The Planning Board reviewed the application at its meetings on March 12, 2015; April 9, 2015; May 14, 2015, and June 11, 2015. In addition, the Planning Board members met with the Applicant for a site visit on April 25, 2015, at the Applicant's residential development in Darien, Connecticut, to observe the Applicant's work first-hand. II. MATERIALS REVIEWED The Planning Board revie d the folio materials i nection with its review of the application and preparation of the within Report and Recommendation: 1. Full Environmental Assessment Form Part 1 and EAF Mapper Summary 2. Traffic Impact Study by Maser Consulting, P.A., Hawthorne, N.Y., dated January 14, 2015 3. ALTA/ACSM La itle Survey prepared by Joseph Link, Mahopac, N.Y., dated as of Januyy 26, 2015, signed February 9, 2015 4. Letter and Petition to the Mayor Rosenberg and the Board of Trustees prepared by Cuddy and Feder, LLP, White Plains, N.Y. dated February 10, 2015 5. Memorandum to the Village Engineer and the Planning Board prepared by Dolph Rotfeld Engineering , P , Tarry n, N.Y. dated March 3, 2015 6. Memorandum to the Ch an an anning Board prepared by F.P. Clark Associates, Inc., dated M �ch 9, 2015 7. Memorandum to the Chairman and Planning Board prepared by F.P. Clark Associates, Inc., date arch 31, 2015 8. Letter to the Cha irma nd Planning Board prepared by Cuddy and Feder, LLP, White Plains, N.Y. dated May 7, 2015 9. School Aged Children, Sun Homes, Rye Brook prepared by Divney, Tung, Schwalbe, LLP, White Plains, N.Y. no date 10.Revised Rendered Illustrative Plan, Affordable Home Plans and Elevations, illustrative plan prepared by Divney, Tung, Schwalbe , LLP, White Plains, N.Y., no date 11.Rendered Illustrative Plan, Home Plans and Elevations, illustrative plan prepared by Divney, Tung, Schwalbe , LLP, White Plains, N.Y., no date -2- 12.Memorandum and Revised Traffic Impact Study, prepared by Maser Consulting, P.A., Hawthorne, N.Y. dated April 15, 2015 13.Letter to Chairman and Planning Board prepared by Cuddy & Feder, LLP, White Plains, N.Y., dated May 7, 2015 14.Rye Brook Emergency Service Task Force Review Memorandum to William Null, Esq. prepared by the Rye Brook Building and Fire Inspector, dated May 7, 2015 15.Memorandum to the Chairman and Planning Board prepared by F.P. Clark Associates, Inc., dated May 13, 2015 16.Memorandum to the Village Engineer, Chairman and P ening Board prepared by Dolph Rotfeld Engineering, P.C., Tarrytown, N.Y., dated May 14, 2015 17.Memorandum to the Chairman and Planning Board prepared by F.P. Clark Associates, Inc., dated May 19, 2015 18.Memorandum to Planning Board and Village Planning C\aeder, ed by Maser Consulting, P.A., Hawthorne, N.Y., dated May 26, 2015 19.Letter to Chairman and Planning Board prepared by CudLP, White Plains, N.Y., datedMay 27, 2015 20.Memorandum to the Chairman and Planning and rk Associates, Inc., dated May 29, 2015 21.Memorandum to the Chairman and Planning Board prepared by F.P. Clark Associates, Inc., date June 1, 2015 22.Engineer's Plans, prepared by Di vne , Tung, hwal P, White Plains, N.Y.: Sheet Number Sheet Title Date SP-0.1 Illustrative Undated SP-1.0 onceptual Site Pla 02/09/15, revised 5/7/15, 5/13/15, 5/25/15 SP-2.0 conce l Grading &Utility Plan 02/09/15, revised 5/13/15 No Number isc. site cross-sections and Undated, revised 5/13/15 r plans III. DISCUSSION The Planning Board, upon review of the aforementioned materials and based upon discussions at its March 12, April 9, May 14 and June 11, 2015 meetings, and the Darien site visit on April 25, 2015, makes the following observations, comments and recommendations with respect to the application: -3- A. General Comments The Planning Board notes that, at present, its Report and Recommendation is limited to the PUD Concept Plan and proposed re-zoning and zoning text amendments requested by the Applicant. Review at this stage is considered Phase 1 of the two-phased review and approval required for all Planned Unit Developments in the Village pursuant to Section 250-7(E)(4) of the Village Code. Phase II shall include subdivision approval (if applicable) and detailed site plan review, including all necessary drawings, specifications and such details of covenants, easements, conditions and performance bonds as are outlined at the time of the PUD Concept Plan approval. Notwithstanding the foregoin the Planning Board is strongly in favor of the � 1111k Project based on its review of the application materials and the Darien, Connecticut site visit conducted on April 25, 2015. The Planning Board fee s the Project will provide much-needed housin in illage, a is especially pleased with the interesting and creative esign of the um s, in clu mg the affordable housing units, and careful detail to la ng and str apes which will greatly enhance the attractiveness of the development. B. Affordable Housing Units 1. Configuration The Project includes ten (10) affordable housing units clustered together near the northeast corner of the project site. As currently proposed, these units will be among the largest sized affordable units in the County and will be architecturally indistinguishable and, like the market rate units, will feature full-length (i.e. 20 foot) driveways and -4- garages located beneath the homes. They will also have screened and landscaped rear yards similar to those of the market rate units. Originally, these units did not feature attached garages or driveways. Rather, attached garages were located across the street from the proposed units. In addition, the units also stood out from the market rate units in that they were attached in groupings of five (split between two buildings) rather than being detached or grouped together in buildings of two or three units apiece. The Planning Board also noted that the units were clustered together in the northeast corner of the Property rather than being interspersed among the market rate units. N% *4% Overall, the Planning Board is strongly in favor of the proposed design of the affordable units and commends the Alicant on developing a creative design that will make the units visually indistinguishable from the rest of the development. The changes made to these unitNJ atly enha their marketability and cohesion with the rest of the Project. However, the Planning Board continues to express concern over the clusteri the unitNiingNle on. The Village Code requires: AFFH Units shall be physically integrated into the design of the development and shall be distributed among the various housing unit sizes ... in the same proportion as market-rate units in the development. The AFFH Units shall not be distinguishable from the market-rate units from the outside or building exteriors. Interior finishes and furnishings may differ in quality from those of the market-rate units. Village Code § 250-26.11'(4)(b). Several Planning Board members feel that clustering the units in a single area will violate this section of the Village Code and engender social separation between families residing -5- in the affordable housing units and those residing in the rest of the development. Therefore, the Planning Board recommends that the Applicant give further consideration to the placement of the affordable housing units. 2. Maintenance Costs and Amenities The Planning Board asked the Applicant how ners of the affordable units th will be charged for maintenance of common im rov\oof scaping and access roads, and for use of recreational a s, inse and pool. The Board has cautioned the Applicant th excludie affordable housing units from using the ame ' ies may beubt has been expressed by the Board that the Applicant will be able to set up an organizational SL structure which creates two separate homeow coNcia (one for the market rate p tl unit owners and one for the affordable housing unit owners), or in the alternative, provides the rdable unit owners with an a la carte option to purchase membership to use t nities, ut inviting discrimination claims. The Applicant explained that if the affordable housing unit owners are required to pay the same common charges as the market rate unit owners, the cost will likely be more than the affordable unit owners can afford. Conversely, allowing the affordable housing units owners to pay less for the same amenities would require the market rate unit owners to subsidize the affordable housing units. An acceptable resolution to this issue still needs to be determined. Regardless of the outcome, the Planning Board strongly urges the BOT to seek a resolution which is -6- consistent with the requirements for affordable housing units established by the Monitor appointed pursuant to the affordable housing settlement and best achieves the Village's goal of fully-integrated affordable housing. C. Traffic The Applicant provided a Traffic Impact Study 0ser Consulting, P.A., dated January 14, 2015, concerning the predicted traffi impacts associated with the Project. This study was later supplemented by memo from Maser dated April 15, 2015 and May 26, 2015. The Village Planning sultant, Michael alante, of F.P. Clark Associates, provided responsivemments to ch of these documents in a series of memoranda dated March 31, 2015, &a , 2015 and June 1, 2015. At the conclusion of his review of the Applicant's suppl mented traffic study, Mr. Galante was satisfied that, wi adjustmen o raffic signal timing, the Project will not cause significant adverse traffic impacts in the development, the neighborhood or the community. The traffic signal timing adjustments will need to be approved by both the NYS DOT and the Connecticut DOT, which has jurisdiction over the intersection of Anderson Hill Road and King Street. The only outstanding comment from Mr. Galante was his recommendation that two dead ends located within the development be converted to turnabouts. Mr. Galante accepted the Applicant's representation that turnabouts at these locations are not feasible due to lack of available space, but noted that he will investigate the matter further during formal Site Plan review. -7- D. School Children The Applicant provided an undated analysis by Divney, Tung, Schwalbe, LLP, entitled "School Aged Children, Sun Homes, Rye BrooV' (the "Divney Analysis") concerning the estimated number of school aged children that will enter the Blind Brook/Rye Union Free School District if the Project is built as currently proposed. The Divney Analysis concluded that, depending on the methodology, either 39, 46 or 72 school aged children are expected to attend Blind Brook schools in connection with this Project. If N�k On review, the Village Planning Consultant, Marilyn Timpone-Mohamed of F.P. Clark Associates, concluded that the Divney Analysis was based on accepted methodology and assumptions used in calculating school aged children and, in fact, was 49101b NIL - 61 based on more reliable assumptions than would have been used under the Rutgers Study standard, which is often used as a metric for the calculation of school aged children. At the Planning Board meeting on May 14, 2015, Chairman Zuckerman noted that the W '441L projection for school aged children from the Bellefair development was significantly greater than the number of school aged children actually generated by that project. The Planning Board acknowledges that doubt was recently expressed regarding these numbers at a recent meeting of the Blind Brook School Board, and also at a joint meeting of the School Board and the Rye Brook Board of Trustees on June 8, 2015, during which it was claimed that more than 100 children could attend Blind Brook schools from the development. However, these assertions are more speculative than the empirical calculations set forth in the Divney Analysis. -8- Based on the Divney Analysis, the Planning Board is satisfied the Project will not likely result in an unmanageable burden on school services in the Village. However, the Board of Trustees may wish to investigate this particular issue further. E. Future Development Several Planning Board members expressed cern over the remaining development potential within the Reckson Executive Park (the "REP"). It was noted by OF the Board members that the REP features bundance arking, which is often underutilized. If the owner of the REP desires, it could potentially reconfigure the parking on the site to allow for additional development, such as increased office space. Further development within the have signif ant impacts on traffic, Village services and the quality of life within the proposed development as well as in the Bellefair and Doral Greens developments. Therefore, the Nanning Board members asked that the Applicant provide information on remaining development potential within the REP. F. Landscaping and Buffering Overall, the Planning Board was pleased with the level of landscaping and screening proposed for the Project. The Applicant proposes abundant screening between units so the resident families will have privacy as well as a lush landscape. The Board expressed concern, however, over the level of screening separating the development and the REP parking lot to the north/northeast of the Project site. In particular, the Planning Board felt that the buffer between the affordable housing units -9- and the REP parking lot might not be sufficient to properly screen the rear of those units from the parking lot. In response, the Applicant increased the proposed buffer on this side of the Project site from 30 feet to 50 feet. The Board remained concerned about the buffer and suggested that the Applicant contact the owner of the REP and explore whether the REP owner is be willing to give up or reduce some of the parking lot to increase the width of the buffer. In its letter of May 27, 2015, the Applicant stated that it has contacted the owner of the REP concerning this issue and is awaiting a response. G. Emergency Services 4t q%L The Applicant was provided with a Memorandum prepared by the Rye Brook Emergency Services Task Force (the "ESTF") concerning the Project. Although the Applicant has since addressed several of the comments set forth in the ESTF's memo, the Applicant deferred several items to the formal Site Plan review stage. These items include: Updating the si e plan to re e minimum 26 foot wide streets for 20 feet in length at each fire hydrant throughout the Project site; 2. Review of the road naming and numbering scheme with the ESTF; 3. Preparation of an emergency vehicle routing and turning radius plan; and 4. Line of sight calculations for the traffic signal at the intersection of International Drive and King Street. These items should be addressed at the appropriate time if this application moves forward under the current proposal. -10- H. Zoning Text Amendment The proposed amendments to the PUD regulations would allow the BOT to waive dimensional requirements under the Village Zoning Ordinance to allow greater development within PUD developments. The proposed amendment mentions specifically the BOT's ability to waive the 9,000 square foot gross floor area limit prescribed for housing units in a PUD development if the applicant proposed affordable housing units equal to 10 percent of the market rate units proposed. The amendment would also allow the BOT to reduce the mandatory buffer, as determined under Section 250-7(E)(2)(e) of the Village Code. The proposed amendment ction 50-7.E.(3) reads: Authority. The llage Board shall be the municipal authority designated o grant approval for rezoning to a PUD District, as well as the PUD concept plan, after recommenclartion of the Planning Board. The Village Board shall retain the , jurisdiction to waive dimensional requirements of the Zoning Ordinance to allow for flexibility �to in the site plan, includingbut not limited to: La) The standards and requirements set forth in Section 250-7.E.(2)(d)f 11 may be waived to permit additional floor area be developed in such PUD development, beyond the 9,000 square foot limit, if the development provides Affordable Housing equivalent to ten (1) percent in number of the market-rate dwelling units in such development, provided that such Affordable Housing is restricted for a fifty (50) year term consistent with the Westchester County settlement and is marketed in accordance with the terms of such settlement. �b The buffer areas set forth in Section 250-7.E.(2)€ may be reduced where the PUD development abuts commercial office improvements. -11- Preliminarily, the Planning Board does not oppose a zoning text amendment that would grant the BOT with discretion to modify bulk zoning requirements for PUD developments. However, such authority should not be unlimited, and therefore a complete wavier of such requirements, as stated in the text amendment currently proposed, should be revised. In addition, as per the Planning Consultant's request, the Applicant should provide gross floor area calculations for all unit models showing what the gross floor area would be (a) if the walk-out basements are factored into the gross floor area; and (b) if the walk- out basements are excluded from the gross floor area calculations. 1% I. COVENANTS, EASEMITSD PERFORMANCE BONDS Consistent with Section 250-7(E)(4)(b ) of t e 1 age ode, the Applicant should provide the BOT Trustees with general information concerning any restrictive covenants, semen 4 =Whis, conditions and/or performance bonds it expects will be needed as part of Phase 11 of the Application. IV. RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the foregoing, the Planning Board hereby recommends to the BOT that the Application for a PUD Concept Plan, re-zoning and zoning text amendments be GRANTED, provided the Applicant shall address the following outstanding issues/comments: 1. The Applicant should consider dispersing the affordable housing units among the market rate units. The BOT should consider whether dispersing the affordable -12- housing units is a strict requirement for the Project, and if so, what relief the Applicant must seek if the units will remain clustered. 2. The Applicant must develop a satisfactory method for charging the owners of the affordable housing units for maintenance of common improvements and use of the on-site amenities without overburdening them. 3. The Applicant should demonstrate the infeasibility of turnabouts in the locations of the two dead ends depicted on the Conceptual Site Plan. 4. The Applicant should provide the BOT with information concerning the future development potential for the remaining portions of the REP sit 5. The Applicant should explore options for increasing or augmenting the proposed buffer between the affordable housing �'td tVP parking lot. 6. The pro osed Zoning text amendment should be revised to authorize the BOT to modify (not wai the k zoning irements for the PUD development. The Applicant should provide the ss floor area information requested by the Vill lanning Co nt. 8. pplicant uld provide the information described in Section I of this Report concerning covenants, sements, conditions and performance bonds. -13- Dated: Rye Brook, New York June 11, 2015 On motion by , seconded by , Mr. Michael Nowak, Superintendent of Public Works, called the roll: APPROVED AT THE JUNE 11, 2015 MEETING OF THE RYE BROOK PLANNING BOARD BY A VOTE OF - to - ACCEPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDA ION: Ayes: Nays: Abstain: Excused: ACCURSO, GOODMAN, GRZAN, MORLINO SCHOEN, TARTAGLIA, ZUCKERMAN -14- e' Y� t .. ��,�i•� _ aaw�la.m. ,mmaa. w• R.. Ria WET O&Tr- „�,• _ �{, 1z��czvJ:.-IUVAzrxlE,PLAN S�IFr�- amaa 'a apar«ap e.10 w�ra S.F•+ E.XI'ERWK\✓ALL ScoNGE -tH- P -- cwm!a caaradapva Ppmg Reataa ' Y'' `t' �fS71�_L11FsfLPuD Pin-5 PR[7�r_ -- ' q ase LAMP POL7 ea lapin -a I rc m' aar��.we'c...rr G�,m' cree"Giam wnmwaa 1tl a 1 me ese 2-a15"H e[B NafG:ELIryGt{f4 WILL®CbTANDARp 1ISIMO MAL, tv " ae a sx ", a ara"mex.a. x.m. an. ca."6rr R.aw SHIEiD I'I(YyEFT LEILEMIM7IHLAI!YEHTSIk'l LWTH 1"-nmy¢LATERALCILAI2Ewea�"renr m'�p � ibme rerl„aea trent•.m" Rw RP m sN'ar 1a5s ata r(�.. m Yse Nsrype of HmamelisiMb'PmplM Prpmbe' Wialrazal�Mwgs Pmmbe g •}�.,; •'j F:� - summer wAen wilsare moat pa tsmme"u moree y 6w y bla'pJCNha' Guickfire 5 6 •Qlh Ilexnreserra Chvra Cbl i:Hna GH Hd" 10 Y _ .p���— —•,s-,L — Ibx vMkA9afe' eAlaE ]al 8 - I .L_=l•.r.QY�'!��Lx. RIioOWerMan meLmua Rrcatry Rluaotlerdmn 5' 11 EXTEP[m WALL Scow-E +A E wrUAZEL ARNoLD5,fW.MV,-&4P74A'L A144101.01. Ol AL Oeinej . rxxremaroa . c«axmdmwn r<os mcerw� RM5 Ef b¢•fbTS � e o.i a '-7+ OXFORD LAMP A P057 - WALPOLE t.✓ P\,VKkMCS �Zvxi —zvz Eu — '—� oz_ • _ :i.2 _ _'_tiers eeA\ �� » '�\\ »\ W �rLs+N ._r ► FERN + 6 ' _ I \ \ \\ `t I f • \ \ \ H t LL• BI A I. * Av'H,p1ApI,E enxwroe LOBE\\¢ 30• aH! ; bey' i �w°'cy'HAtn Wfa `> 63 tATF \ 9'€, OA a.•IM AIFKEe IiLA zi CIL,5 DY' _ _— ___— �. - e5r -. - z0.e4•FbTS XhsnNa=ensrnit De T.le+D wlftllAzEL ARtloLo59ROH15Eo AL- - Arm IAHT w L . 4eTts• 1 %vlSbp JVNE.IOIZOIS - 1 DANIEL S H E R M A N LANDSCAPE&MITIGATION LIGHTING ALL RIGHT5 RESERVED.COPY OR REPRODUCTION OF THIS A PLANTING PLAN / PLAN PLAOR ANY PORTION,THEREOF 15 PROHIBI ED wm10UT Benchmark LM Management Services LLC BEDGEWOODMVE 1` �`� NDSCAPE ARChITECT, P.C. THE WRITTEN PPM155ION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARO[ECT. 951 E.Boston Post Road RYE BROOK,NY '. f 4 Broadwa.5mte 9 PRAWN By;DR DATE:1013/14 REV:'�'h RTi"9 R°T ALTERATION OF THIS DRAw1NG,EXCEPT IF DONE BY OR Mamaroneck NY 10543 =T�'" v..."".NY 10595 N e nT UNDER THE DIRECTION OF THE UCEN5W L.A.THAT T:9I4-924-0999 .P—T usT PREPARED THEM,15 A VIOLATION OF NYS EDUCATION LAW. F:9I4-824-0251 SCALE:I'-10-0' SHEET:L-I June 11, 2015 RESOLUTION APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR A SITE PLAN AND WETLANDS PERMIT TO DEMOLISH AN EXISTING HOME AND CONSTRUCT A NEW SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE AT 8 EDGEWOOD DRIVE VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK PLANNING BOARD WHEREAS, Timothy Allen, P.E., on behalf of Frank Chiarello (the "Applicant"), has submitted an Application for Site Plan approval and a Wetlands Permit to demolish an existing single-family home and construct a new single-family residence at 8 Edgewood Drive in the R-25 Zoning District. Said premises being further identified as Section 135.28, Block 1, Lot 28 on the Town of Rye Tax Assessor's Map; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board reviewed the following plans and application materials in connection with the proposed application: 1. Exterior Building Permit Application dated 11/24/14 2. Building Permit Checklist and Zoning Analysis 3. Site Plan Application and Checklist 4. Short Environmental Assessment Form 5. Letter to the Planning Board from Bibbo Associates LLP, Somers, N.Y. dated April 20, 2015 6. Letter to the Planning Board from Bibbo Associates LLP, Somers, N.Y. dated November 6, 2014 7. Letter to the Planning Board from Bibbo Associates LLP, Somers, N.Y. dated October 30, 2014 8. EPA On-Scene-Coordinator's Bulletins for Port Refinery, 55 Hillandale, Rye Brook, N.Y. 9. Environmental Site Remediation Database Search for Barbera Residence a.k.a Port Refinery Superfund Site 10.Engineer's Report prepared by Bibbo Associates LLP, Somers, N.Y. dated July 16, 2014 11.Memorandum to the Planning Board from the Building and Fire Inspector dated August 18, 2014 12.Wetlands Functional Capacity Report prepared by Evans Associates, Inc., Bethany, C.T. dated September 12, 2014 13.Wetlands Delineation Report prepared by Evans Associates, Inc., Bethany, C.T. dated April 29, 2014 14.Title Survey prepared by Edward G. Mihalczo Land Surveyor, LLC, Yonkers, N.Y. dated May 29, 2013 13131741546620v1 6111115 15.Topographic Survey, prepared by Edward G. Mihalczo Land Surveyor, LLC, Yonkers, N.Y. dated July 12, 2013 last revision April 10, 2014 16.Engineer's Plans, prepared by Bibbo Associates LLP, Somers, N.Y.: Sheet Number. Sheet Title. Dated SP-1 Site Plan 10/21/13 rev. 4/17/15 TPPP Tree Preservation and Protection Plan 10/21/13 rev. 4/17/15 EC Erosion Control Plan 10/21/13 rev. 10/30/14 D-1 Details 10/21/13 rev. 4/9/15 HSP-1 Height/Setback Plan 8/16/14 rev. 10/30/14 Irl Landscape and Lighting Plan 10/3/14 rev. 12/17/14 17.Builder's Plans, prepared by Ritz-Craft Corporation: Sheet Number. Sheet Title. Dated ELVA Elevations 10/24/14 FPI First Floor Plan 10/08/14 FP2 Second Floor Plan 10/08/14 FD Foundation Design Criteria 10/24/14 X1 Section 10/24/14 The Board also reviewed a series of memoranda from the Village Planning Consultant, F.P. Clark Associates, dated September 8, 2014, December 9, 2014 and May 7, 2015 concerning the application; and WHEREAS, on December 11, 2014, the Planning Board referred the Application to the Rye Brook Zoning Board of Appeals for certain area variances needed in connection with the Proposed Action; and WHEREAS, the Applicant then modified the Application to eliminate all but one of the area variances requested; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals then granted the Applicant the variance by resolution adopted April 7, 2015; and WHEREAS, on May 14, 2015, the Planning Board adopted a resolution setting the Public Hearing on the Application for June 11, 2015; and WHEREAS, a duly advertised public hearing was opened on June 11, 2015, at which time all those wishing to be heard on the Application were given such opportunity; and WHEREAS, the public hearing was then closed on June 11, 2015; and 13131741546620v1 6111115 -2- WHEREAS, the Proposed Action is a Type II Action pursuant to the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA), and accordingly, no further environmental review is required; and WHEREAS, the Village Planning Consultant, Village staff and the Planning Board have reviewed the information and submitted comments regarding the Application; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board is fully familiar with the site and all aspects of this Application. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Village of Rye Brook Planning Board hereby approves the Application referenced herein, subject to the condition that: and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that no permits shall be issued until the Applicant has paid to the Village all applicable fees and professional review fees incurred in connection with review of this Application. On motion by seconded by Mr. Michel Nowak, Superintendent of Public Works, called the roll: Domenic Accurso, Jr. Voting Robert Goodman Voting John Grzan Voting Sal Morlino Voting Amy Schoen Voting Daniel Tartaglia Voting Gary J. Zuckerman, Chairman Voting 13131741546620v1 6111115 -3- RYE BROOK PLANNING BOARD W CHAIRMAN'S MEMORANDUM FOR THE MEETING OF: April 9, 2015 AGENDA ITEM: Review of an Application by Frank Madonna for approval of a Site Plan, Subdivision (Lot Merger) and Petition for Re-zoning, to construct a mixed use Multi-Family/Retail Building on property located at 80 Bowman Ave, Rye Brook NY, Parcel I.D. 141.27-1-26,31,32 SUGGESTED ACTION(S): Resolution to Refer to the Zoning Board of Appeals Resolution To Set A Public Hearing Report and Recommendation to the Board of Trustees BACKGROUND: The revised application proposes construction of a three-story, residential/retail mixed-use building consisting of 2,400 square feet of ground-floor retail space along Bowman Avenue, and 16 apartments with an entrance on Barber Place, along with a total of 39 parking spaces. The residential component of the development would include eight one-bedroom and eight two-bedroom apartments. Each apartment includes a 64 square-foot terrace. The revised submission also includes a subdivision application to combine the lots that comprise the property required by Section 250-6 A. (2) (a) of the Rye Brook Code, and a petition to the Board of Trustees to amend the Zoning Map of the Village to remove the property from the FAH District and include the property within the C1 District. The revised Proposed Action no longer includes a petition requesting zoning text amendments of the C1 District. However, Applicant is requesting certain variances from the C1 District regulations, which will require referral to the ZBA. The Planning Board is the Final Approval Authority for the Site Plan and Subdivision applications. The Board of Trustees is the approval authority for the rezoning petition. It is suggested that at this meeting we refer the requested variance to the ZBA, schedule a Public Hearing, and submit a Report and Recommendation regarding the zoning petition. At our May 14 meeting it is planned that we make a declaration of significance under SEQR. At our June 11 meeting it is planned to hold the Public Hearing. FEDERICO ASSOCIATES architecture - planning Anthony F. Federico R.A. June 5, 2015 Mr. Gary Zuckerman, Chairman Planning Board, Village of Rye Brook 938 King Street Rye Brook, N.Y. 10573 RE: Bowman Plaza Mixed Use Residential/ Retail 8o Bowman Avenue Dear Chairman Zuckerman, In response to the Planning Board comments, F.P. Clark memo dated May 27, 2015 and Westchester County Planning Board letter dated May 12, 2015, we are submitting herewith revised plans and documents as follows: Revised plans that respond to all comments from the Planning Board,Village staff, the Village's consultants and Westchester County Planning Board. A full EAF revised and filled out on line at the NYSDEC Mapper website including the data verification sheet. The stormwater management plan is shown on sheet 5-Utilty Plan and the calculations are shown on sheet 10- Details. Also, we met with Michael Izzo Building Inspector, Michael Galante Traffic Engineer for F.P. Clark and Marilyn Timpone Mohamed Planner for F.P. Clark on May 19, 2015 regarding the Fire Apparatus Access Road. Today we received the memo from Michael Izzo regarding the Emergency Services Task Force comments (see memo attached dated June 5, 2015). Due to the fact that we must submit our revised plans and documents today for the June 11, 2015 Planning Board meeting,time will not allow us to address these comments. However, the items of concern do not affect the site plan and we believe we can resolve these issues directly with the Fire Dept. prior to the final site plan approval. We are hopeful that this submission will allow the Planning Board to make a SEQRA determination for the project. 1048 dobbs ferry road 914-593-5401 white plains n.y. FEDERICOASSOCUTES aivbit ctzre ;darning Anthony F. Federica R.A. ThaA,.yuu for your consideration. ve 1V you Bowman,Plm LLC, Encl.. Madly n TemponMohamed FP Clark'by email iu48 dobby ferry read 914-693-5401 white pfalin$ nslv. Fall EnvironnwantlAsawssment ram Part I� 'rorjcct and SeWa Instracdons for Campletittg l' rt I Part I is to be comptetod by the applicant or project sponsor. Responses lame part of the application for approval or funding, arse subject.to public review,and may be subject to further verrtttcafio t. Complete Part t based tart information cwTeattl}available. If additional mscarch or investigation would be needed to fully r td to easy item,ply�vt t as tlttrmu hly as posssible based carr current inforn��ttion,indicate whether missing information does not ist, car is not r�anbly available to the sponsor;and.when possible, encrally descri.W work or studies whiolt would be nwessary tD update or fully develop that information. Appikantsisponsors must= ornpletc all items is motions A&,B. In.Sections C.D&E,most i teras contain as in quemion that must be answered either"`'ti`ee orW. if the answer to the an del queAun is"'ties",complete the suh-quoWom that follow. if the at wvr to the iinitial question is'Ne.proceed to the text question. SMion F allows tate project gxmsor to identify and attxtela arty> Witional information. Section U requites the name and signature;of the project sponsor to verify that the info tnation contained in Part.1 is,accurate aaid complete, A."err and 9ponsor Information. Name of fiction or Praaje ct; Bowman Plaza LLC Project,Location(describe,and'ettach a pnerol lcrc.alion?yap): 80 Bowman Memo Ftye Brook NY Brief Description o0roposed Actio,(include purpose or need)- Construct,aniltW use biJ to cantaining 18 resWentlal aparonents and 2400 square fee atreW1 space. Dame of ApplicantiSpomor t eietalaczne:91+4-263440 Bowman Piwa UC "b ile ftstaetlaserat >�cai.c st Aldi :7 swum HI{CWrt twttyrP ^plossantu Stole,NY asp[" �El57ta PMjea Ccatttact(if not SWC a",spunW,give clan♦And Wer*kr. Telephone, .some � E-Mail: Addms: Ci ; See: Zip Code: Properry Owner (if not,sarno as sponsor),. Telephonc. Sea* flail: Ad : C ity"PO: 'itstie; ?its Code: Page 1: of 13 Government Approvals B.Government nt Approvals,Fuadln%. or Sponsorship. (- undine includes gram,ICES.ux Mier,and aw coheir fotns of fittancial: assi�tattce.) Goverment Entity If Yom.IdentifyAgency and Approvral(s) Appliratiou Date Required (Actual or projrcted) a.City Council,Tmm Board, Wesco Zorn eta"ftm FAH to CI or Village Bmrd of'Trustm VAtw Bowl ofTnmteers Plamiat B"d or Commission PtMAN turd:. C.City Colace&],Town or 0YOSO Am&Vwiar*3 N'H 9P BMd of A . 5 7tte Zoning Board of fiats t1,Other local agencies Clyesl--3N s C.County agars OY oONo lt401ud agencies Mcs1No g'State a'encM, oyesoxo h.l ede1w agencies MeSONO i, Coaswltesourcm I.. Is the Project site Math:n a Cna. lar,or the r+aterfront arva of a Designated I Mand Waterway? Oyesoso ii. is the pojcite tetcan acar ntotwith approvedL€ l icterfoxt tevipr . -zt? L y ??lo M. Is the project site within a Coastal Emsicn Hazard Arm. 13 Ycs2jNq G Laing and Zoning C.I.Planoing sod zoning actioa& Will administrative or legislative adoption,or amendment of a phM,local law,ardiraan ,rule or.regvlatioD be the OYcesl o only rovai(s)vehicle Must be gated to enable the pr(pnscd action to prcoced? + Ix�' ,.corstpletr s tir s C,F WOO., • It No,proceed to question C::'and.omplete all remaining sections and questions in Purl 1 G.Z.Adopted land use pleats, a.Doany lmunicipally-adopt (city,town.village or couut )comprehensive land pl s)include the site �° Ica. whttt the prwosed a. on would be locate e? If Yes.does the comprehensive plant include specific recommendations for the site whe'r+e.thc propoud action JZY esONo wouldlme l6cate€i? b.is the site✓,ofthepropdstcl action wMiti any local or rcicsreall£i Special planning district t for ex ple- Gre nu-ay (3YesoNto d i"'d Opportunity area(80A) deidpatod date or Federal lteArltage.rtrca;waiershe d mmpun"t platy; or Ace) I f yes,identify ft pl s)c ce is the propmd action l9caled wholly or part ally%%it in an areallsted io an adopted rmttnMpal open s{ c pian. E]YesONo or an adopted municipal farmland protection lana If Ycs,iiS mfy the plan($). CA ming a. is the site of the proposed action located in a municipality with are adopted zoning law or ordinance. OYesMo If Ym wtm is the-zoning classi.firration(s)including any appticable€VAalay district? FAN lr } special or use. b. is the u�peaTnit car altovwed It�.a. perir � c:is a zoning change reqnsted as W cafes proposed acH60 123 VeS[3NO lfYm r`. What is dw.pr sed now zoning for the site?01 �,�.��iati etataaraxity sea�iocs. A.to whw school disuiLt is Ow project site located?Part vec- L4riW gree SOMI aE b.What potice.or olherpubl.ic protection form serve the pmjct�tsite? e.Which fire prowion and emergency medical services serve the projed site d.What pis wave the project site? D.Project Wtails 0.1..Proposed and Poteratlat Development a ,What:is the Vneral nature of the proposed action.(e.g.,resider al,industrial,commercial,recreational if direct!,include all eomponeatts)?MixW Uso4wWentiai and Cornmerda.1 b.a.Taal image of ftsifte of thce proposed a tine, 0,50 :acres b.Total=cage to be physic ly 6stua`ts V 0.50 acres c.Total acreage(project site and any.conftuous propertics}owned or=trotted by the appticant.or project sponsor;' a DAA acres c.is the proposed,action an exparission ofeur existing project or.rtse? O.'YtONo L I r Vesu whin is the approoxitatate peacent i:of dee proposed expansion and identify the ural (e g,Acres,mites,housing urti%, square ft)? % Units:®� ..... d.is'tlte prod action a subdiv isivta.car does it include a subdiv°iskri? O Y"es, o If"Yes, r P"se orlypu of subdivision') residential,icadatrial,comnaereialatfmixed..specify types,) merge'tAsting Letts m Is a clustcrkonservation layout Proposed? iNo ii%Number of kits proposed iv,.Minimum and rnaximum proposred lot sixes? h4initnum . Maximum _ c.Will proposed action be constructed in multiple plias '? r7l YeSONO L If N-6.ititicipated period of construction; 12 mouths ar, lfyts:. Til munber ofphases anticipated • Antle:ipated commencement date of phase t (including demolition) month Year Anticipated completion date of final Phi T..-- t€reinter Generally gibe conn o:tions or relationships aa'n g.phasesa including any.contingencies where PTvgm 03 Date phase v deterrnitrc timing or deratien ofWre debases; Page 3ofl3 C Does the project include new residential u ? � �NO IfYes,showy numbers of units proposed. .FMilv Um f mLv MuWtl .1 Initial Phase 16 ,fit completion ofall.phases 16 iz.Does the proposed aiction include atew tion-residential construction(including exp.'trtsions)? If Yes, i.TMT number ofstructures aures t h. Dimensions(in fit i of largest proposed stmeture. 10 height ....... 72'width'. and 32 loin M...Ap ixiMale er;tcot of building space to be heAted or led: --_. . . 2400 square feet "h.Om the proposext action include construction or other actiAties that vVill result in the'mVundrnem of any DYesONo liquids,sttrh as creat drt of a tw;Rter supply-,resa weir,pDnd,lake.waste lagoon of.Cather storage Iryes. L Purim of the impoundment, tl. If war impounclra ort,the principal suuroc of ,water t rdur d water[] wirer s 00ther s ib. ni. lfother than water:identify the type of.impousac+e&contained liquids and their source, - ---------------� iv: " Pproxirna O si;?e of theproposed impoundment. Volume. _ Milliongallons;surfaceam: acres v DirneW*ns of the proposed:;dam or impounding structure; __ hcighr _ length r-3.Congir action mcthod�matterials fvi the prripu",d darn or iwpouatding strucitue(e.g„eta fill,reck,wood,Loncretel: E>L Project Operations a.too elte'proposed action include any excavation,cuitaing;or drer3 ing,during construction.,op M. flons,Or lxttr Yes ea (INL pt.inelud` genesl site prep tion,ceding or instal Man sof tatiiitie s or foundations where all"mated materials will remain onsite). IfYes; i..Thatis the purpoNe of the exa ttion or dredgine. ........-, A How much materiat(including rack,essth,sediments,etc,}is proposed to be removed from the site' Volume fspecify tans or culxie yards). + Ovtr what.dura tion of time? X. Oescribe nature arta„:chaWeristics of materials to be excavated.or dredged,and pla nss 'to use,man a or&Vose of"them, i► Will dbwalcring or processing.of excavated materials? YC.!$0 itib If yes,gibe. t: What is the tout ma to be dredged cwrexcawated? "acres Vi. WhAt is the titaxitttuttw area to be worked at any,one time? acres wrl. What vauld be ttte maximum depth of excavation or dredging!!_...._:-. — ~�f t Wit WilI r exca�radoo require blasting, �... []YesoNo & Summarize site rr c.larn rim"s and plan, b;Would ft pea sed action cause of result in alt tion of,increase or decrease in size of,or encroachment YCSa tl intra any t&isting wdland,water,shoreline,beach or adja l arca'! I:t Yes: x.Identify the wet land car cautrarbody rvhlch would be affected(by°nate,vva%T ind"-number,wetland map number or geographic .description), PaSe 4 of I.a R R. E7x�lb�.lrcity the proposedtstitit�lt would ailt ater�y or�vetld v.g,excavation,fiiT,pluement ofstructures.ttar ,car alteration of channels.1 arks and shorelines. Indicate extent of wivities,alterations and'additions in~ware fftt or acres: i a. 1l ill pressed action cause or result in disturbarwe to bomm sediments? Yes�No If Yes,describe- _ i v; Will proposed action cause or result in the destruction or removal of aquatic vegetaticata?� �.._..�_ El YCSMNIa If Yes,. • acres of oquattie veg ;tion proposed to Ise removed: _ - • expected acrew of aquatic vesetation,mmaini ag after project completion, ............ • purpm of proposed removal(e.g:Bch clearing',invasive species control,boat uccesS):: ...,. _ . • proposedmucid of plank removal- _.._ if clteriii terbiei treatment witl be. used,specify presduco) r, Dewy ibe any proposal reclantation1mitigation following disturbance- c. isturl ecc.W i It the proper action use,or create a new demand for water'? �Y Ifyw. i.Total ant citwed water'w fahlemand per day- 99k gallonsM ay U,lilt the proposed action obtain water froman existing pulslic.w r supply? Oyes[No • Nam of district or servile arew. t nim water Now Roavoe Does the existing public water wpply haw capacity to serve the proposal? � VF m µ O YaOo • is the project site in the existing district? O Yes ]oto • Is expankion of the district needed*? 0 Yes.0 No Do existing lines serve the project site? ®yeso No arty Will line extengon within mi existing district be necemr.y to haply the project:' ®YesONo • Dwribe extensions or comity expansions proMcd-to save this.project,__ • Sour*s)of supply for the district; -....._. iv, Is a new grater supply district or senlee area proposed to be formed to sertre the project site;' El YeSONO If,Yes: • Apptiesnt'sportser for necv district- ------------ • -----_----• Date application submined or anticipated:�... • ftposed soume(s)of supply for new diwi& r, if al public water supply Will not be used,describe plans to ptoviede wait"supply for tfw project: vi.Ifwate+r'supply %ill be frorn omlls(public or private),maximum pumping capacity: gallo mMute, d.Will the prop sod.action gate liquid Aaws? Yea. to If Yes: .i TOW anticipaw liquid v te.Setteration per day'. 00 Balt day U,,, Nature, 'liquid wastes to l generated sx tory wastewater,Ater,induS al,if combination,describeal,J components and approximw volumes or propordons oreaach): al,will,themed action tlse any existing public wastowazertreatmentfacilit es? Oyes o lr {R v • Flame of wastewater treatment piant to be used.tastchesatar county ♦ Nam rJNIStrict: Pato Chester mer Di3uid • Does the exis it► uas 4razeartreat hent plant have oapacity to serve the ptb�t"? • Is the frceget site in the existing distrix r? OyeSONO • Is em tsian of the district needed? ClYes to Page 5 of 13 • Do txistin stwtr lints serve thae.proj t site? • Will line extension within an existing distriia be n ,essary toserve the projecc€? 0Yes0No If Yes: Describe a actemions or capacity expansions propwW to,wrve this project., ir_ will a newv wastewater(seww�;e)treatment.disbict be fwd to serve the prnjeet site? CjesO o Ir Yes: ' ApplimVVonum for new district-, • Date application.submitted or antis ipatW: What is the receiving,water for the wastewater di Marge a 11. :lf public facilitits will not be used,describe plans to provide wastewater treatment for the.prcjec.ineloding specie ink rvc ving water([acme and classification if surfam discharge,or deacrihe subsurfaee dis"l platts): ri Describe.any plans or designs to caplurc,r0qcle or t=liquid wus. P Will the proposed Paion dish Mott than one acre and create stormwater nmoff,either ftm new poia Yeso o sounds(i.e.ditches,pipes,swale s,curbs,gutters or other concentrated flnwws of vortnwater)or nary-plaint sours (i.e.sheet flow)during zonstruet on.or past construction:' If YM L s How touch impervious surface will the project create In relation to total size ofproject,parcel'' squam feet or acres(impervious surfacei m geiarc feet or ....... acres{parcel sized rr �types of new pout some W. Where will the star waar ntaoff be directed(i.t„on-site stormw Iter management facililyfstructur ,4acent p mommies, raundwattr,tin-bite surf eater or off-site surface waters)? if to.surface wwFat+m identify=eivingg water bodies or wetlands- 9 Will-sto �water rtmoff flow to adjacent properties? EIY(*ONn iv boas propx�ed plan.mWntiz;e impervious surfaces,use mvious materials or collect and re-use stormwater" UNo OYe r fps the pfosed Action ii chore,or will it use on-site;one or more sonnet,of air emissions,including fuel ©Y,60No combustion,waste incineratim or other processes or operations? If Yes,id tt - i.Mobft saurus during project opera#iami(c.&,beavy equipment,fleet or defi ery vehicles) U. Stationary sources dura construction te.g.,power gerwafiun,structuartl-heatin� M Stationary,scour during,cslaeratisr (e.g.,paroces-=t UiOn%large btailM.elCCtri4�-geraeratt '} g_ Witl any spit`emission riour es.named in t(above),"quire;a NY Mate Air Registmtion,Air Facility permit, [ Yes0NO orFederal CIM Air Act Title lig or Title V pertnit" If'Yes. L Is the project slte Dated in ars Air quality neon-att$itttncr t are*0 (Area routinely or peAodia iy fails to mem 13 Y,�*O Nb ambient alr quality stwKlards for all or soint parts of the year) ii in.addition to ei issions as calculaW in the application,the project wwailf gr ncrute ■ TonWycar(shon for )of Cin.Dioxide(Co„) • T°otssryear(short[Daus)ofNitrous Oxide(N,1 ) * at year(short.torts)of perfluor arbors(l'ECs) • l rstt fyeaa (short tons)ofSulfur l-lexafluoride(SF r: * � °citafcyear(short tons)of Carlson Dioxide Cquivalcm of Hydraflourocarbons,J'HFCs) • _.. ° 'year(short tons)of Hazardous Air Poiltrumts(1 iFtih'x) Page 6 of 13 h.Will the proposed rection generate or emit rnetharte Oncludain ,tout not limited tose ;e treatment plants, ° yes. too landfills,composting faciliday.1 If Yes. i,Estimattr ttioftne gettem(ion in t =`year(metric), Ut bribe any rttethane capture,control or elimination measures included in project design(e.g..,combustion to generwe heat or eledncity,flaring):.» J..Will the proposeA,aMon temult in the rebase ofair pollutants front ole-air operations or processes„saeh as OVOOK qui or landfill tiperatiomO If Yes:Describe uperafiuos and stature ofemissions(c,& diel exhaust,rock particulate-iPdw); j,Will the propos action result in a substantial increase.in traffic above present levels,or generate substauMd ClYesoNo new dere and.for transportation facilities or servWes? l'l'Yes; i When is the prak traffic expected(Check all thatapply), ❑Morning [I Evening O IM4."d 0 Randornly between hours of to it, For commensal activities only,projected number of s rti-trailer truck triW4 in;Parking sees: alsting Prsapo�4d Net incrcrest;4c,r t iv,S .the propos aetion include any shared use parkin ? JYs�' v:- if the proposed action includes any mod.ifcation of existing roads,creation of new roads or cbange in existing access,describe aio Are public`prioite transpoMtion vii (s)or ititiea available xvithin',i mile t fAe propmed sate? ^qvesnNo tit Wilt the proposed action.include:access to public transpr tion.ar=*mmodations far use of hybrid.electric OYCONO orother alterrtati.ve fueled vehicles". p e:accommodations for connection to:iexistyng OYao7 to �^if1 will the pep .acxictn:irrcludc lam for pedestrian or bicycle: pedesWan or-;bicycle romes? .ke 7141 the proposed actin(for commercial or industrial projects ante)generate nevv or additional demand' ayesoNo for encwq tf` m t. Estimate annual electricity demand during operation of the propose action. ire A.ndeipated sourcesisuppliws of clectriclty for the project(c_g.,on-site combustion,on-sate renewable,via gridilocal tai.I.AV,,or other), ids: Will the proposed action require a new,or an upgrade ter an existing swbstation? OY.e§IDNa 1.Hours of motion: Answer all items which apply Dutin Construction: it. During:t peratioms- ® Monday-Friday, aa_ 5-pm a Monday-Friday:�_ + Saturday- .. .... a TSD +. Sunday. w arnday{: . Tat) • I lt�Iidoy . Holidays: Page 7 of 13 ... ......... . ill t Proposed produce noise,that mill excel 4xi d arotm noise 1�4�1�during��an�tretc� ❑l° ���z operation,or both? fry". i, Provide.4wils including sources,time of'day i;d d=tion, ii. Vw`iil proceed bion rete cxistirsg flame!bmien that c-ould act as a noise barrier or screeir, t'cs. to bribe: ti., Will the propowd action have outrloar lighting? OYs' iEo lf��t�i;A r. Descritc svtur*s),.Iocatiott(s),height of ftxture(4 tl eMion.Aaim and proximity to nearest smpid;sttuictures: an%A 12'P h !elam rt_ Will prWsed.wion remove existing natural barriers that mid act ai light barrier or scree"'? Yes f1No De"ba- o, Does the proposed action have tbt potential.to produce odors for more ter one hour per day's oyes�Ro 1f Yes,d - lbe,possible sources,potential frequency and duration of odor emissiOns,attd PMximity to n M-%t. occupied struclu= p.gill the proposed action include any balk storage of petroleum(cemtWn.e l: sat:ity:of over 1,100 p1tons) OYtsONo or cherniraiil products.185 gallons in above ground storage or any amount in underground stork. t r yes. 4 ProducgsI to be stored r`r. volutttedsl per unit Littre motitlt.year) H4 Gezteraily describe proposed storage ficilities. till the p ion(umemal,in<tArW and reaeational pmjms only)use pesticides(i „ kiY . aanr h ide )during construction or operation? If Yes: Describe propnse+d treatment(s): tl.Will the ff2p2scd uta use Ince ' toad lit Management Prtices? 0 Yep ONO V;Will the proposed acticara( ttuinercinl or industrial prnj"only)involve or rewire the rrtserrrerrt'dr dispel 3 Yes.QINa of stolid w(excluding hazardous crtaterials)? ft'1r'm L Ilibc any solid wasto be,generates during construction or operation of the£ac%Ilt+m • Construction! tarts per .(unit Of timO • gyration tons per. (unit of time) Ui [gibe any prpposdls for on-site minitnitation,recycling or reuse of m rials to avoid dispel as solid waste: + Construction; • Operatiom III, proposed d€spiml method"acilities for solid waste gentraterl.on-site: m - • oristrrrcuan' Cplration: -------- - Page 8 of 13 S'Doa the prcalaasetl action irtefurle con strttctltan of sstaditiratir€a.ra> a solid xste..atlaettt facility? Yes 0 No If Yes, i_ Type of management zit.handling of Waste proposed for the site(e.g_req cling tir trnasfet station,composting,landfill,or other disposal aetivitie.0 i, Antkipated rate of ditpoW/proeming, • Tottrrottt;s,if transfer nr tithes that-e�snt�trstltstt;'ttt�al t�eatratettt,or * Tonstour,if combustion or thermal tri aunent 1A If landfill,antic4xftd site lite; years L W-Al propdscd cation at the site ittvdfve the commercial generation,treatmerit,storagge,or disposal of hazardous ❑YOS filo wastc? tryes.. L aftw(s;)of all hazardous wastes or const meats to bay Swerated,handlcd or tr raged at twility>. ii. Generally describe procusscs or actio itis la%viv°ing hazardous wastes or wnstituents:, i#rI ,atnoient>o be ltantllecl or gettted toms nton it=. Describe any proposals for on-site minimization,recycling or reuse of hazardous constituents. - v. Will any hazardous was be disposed at an existing oit°sitc tiuxdous waste facility? l~10 If Yat provide name and lavation of facility; IfNo:,describe proposed mariagement of any hazardous wastes which wilt not be sem to a hazardous waste facility,- ----------------- E. acile s;E,Site ascii SettittC of Proposed Action F.t:I;atd a on.and surrounding tete pr®,leet site a.Existing lead um, a.tWhftk all uses that occur on,ad,pining and near the miect site. 0 Urban 0 Industrial 0 'Commercial 0 R idvoJal.(suburban) Rural(non-farm) Q-ForC&I [ Agriculture ;11 Aquatic El Other(spixit ,); u. l.f mLx of uses,generally describe. b.Land uses and coveertypes on the project site Land use . currant Xcrew After Change Covert... Acrea a Proiec t.CD etian (Acres+r. • Roads,bnitdings�,attd other paved or impervious surfs Q.i4 0,44 +&34 • Meadows,grassctands or lirttshlart&(ran- 0:22 Q -0.22 ricultural,iflCIu4jM abwdon!e�ia 'cultural) Agrictiltund I o o 9arludes.active orchards,field,grcenhouse eta:.) + Surface water.features I 69 tt o (lalc , ds;finis.,rivers,ere.} +► Wetlands lands(fr hwater or tidal) • Non-vegetated j barc.mk,rare or 011l Other L rtbe;E ca�P® - ,t1 t tt,t3d -0,02 i Page 9 of 1 c.Is tlt��Wi0d site pr+eset'ctly:used b�!ttaennbers(if the Community for u61k;rzcreR.ti "? k 1f Yes;"'0aint facilities Serving children.rn4 tltt elderly,people svnih disabilities(e,g,schools,hospitals,iicemed ❑YeaNo day ane centers,or group!tart os)within l Soo f6e of the project site? frYes, a.: Idertti�y piilities: _. � Btes elle project site csrrttaurt an axistin4am? D�r`�Nra If Yes: i< Dimensions of the darn and itnpowi lment: + Dam height: _ fr=et 4k Dam length, test Sttrec area ..._ acres Volume Impounded: ..... acref .........__ gF cei ii, Dam's existqh4=dclassil'cation _. ._. hi. Provide date and summarize milts of last.irtslse�tion:. f bias them projeo site ever b n used as a municipal,conimereial or industrial solid'.waste manapmwnt facile or does the;Project site adjoin property which is now-or was at one:time,used as a solid waste management fgcili � Iryes! f. Has the rsil'ity leers formally el 0yesO No • tares,cite sourc idocamentation. __ f,.Describe the loca#ion of the projeO,she restive to the boundaries ol:the Wlid tare Management facility- M, Describe dcvcl€?ptrrcttt constmints doe to the prier mfid waste activities: - i .1 Have her rcic us motes been generated,treated.and/or disposed of at the site,or does the prerjW site adjoin O VaONo property which is now or was at one time used to contmercialty troat,store anwor dispose ofhazardous waste, If Ye;: i. Describe was"st handled and waste managcoicm ai:tivities,including approximate time when actin=ides occutred, It, laazent@ cera ttrinaian history, Hw there begs a reporWd spill at the primed projr.�ct sited have aRy 0'r eso ?tiita remedW actions been cDudoct aterr adiamt.w the proposed site If Yes: f Is any portion of the site listed on the N�YSDBC Spills inciden%dstabase ter EnviromentWSite Remediation database? (,`heck all tllat apply: Q Yes—Spills Incidents dater Provide DEC. 1D numbeils): 0 Yes. tvirranrwntal Siti Etcedixttion database Provide DEC It7 zBtrriibriwr(s): 0 Neither database ii. If site ham been subjeoi of RcRA corrective wiities..describe control meas: tai. is MO.pr(ca --thin 2000 feet pfany site in the NYSDK Lnvitarimontul Site R,:mediatian database Wyes,provide DEC:ID nunaberlsl= iv, tfyes to(i),(ti)or(iii)alma ,describe current status of siala -- v Is:he.project site subject to an institutional Control JiMiting PMPefty U$CS? No i- Ifyes,DrC°site ID number; _ * gtt Describe the type of institutional ntrol(e.g_d restriction or�ent�;_...._......... ...._...........:..,.a.,.,..,�.�.�.�.�.�. ----------- �..,_.. . • Describe any use limitations: • D"C€ibe any engineering Controls° r Will the project affect the insttrational or.engineerin controls in place? • F-xplahl: L2.Natural Resourtes On orNw Project Sitt a What is the awe depth to bedrock on the project site? b.Are there frock outeroppirV on the project site? y n If yes,wear proportion of the site is comprised of bedrock outcroppings? �.f -,o C.Predominant soil ty- s)present on project site. Paxwn CMPIW i00'% d.WbOt is the Rvera *depth to the water table on the project site" Average: V+ feet CMUGIa�e. t€ otprojeCt site i s veil praitt : 1€0%of site 0 Moderately Well Drained, :---%of site Poorly Drained %Of Etc f.Approximate proportion of proposed aictionsite with slopes: ®:tit o/k 160%ofsitt �[ ttt-15 °nvk'site ( 15%or meter ° of site p Are their*any unique geologic Mures on.the prc t site. y No tf 'cs describe, h.Surface water feattm�s. t Does any portion ofdw projectsite contaiO wettands or01t waterb ii s tincWiogs'trcwis,Tiven.. C1YcsOhln ponds or lak-esr 11 Do.any%gaols or other%aterbodies*oin the project site? ElytSOt o Ff 4 a to either i or ii,.con" e. l tNo,skip to E21 if Are,any.ofthe wedands or waterbodits within or 4oinitig the project site r+ Matted by any federal,. OYC-SONO state or to 1 avw� iv; For each ideatified mgWated wetland and uaterbody on the project site,provide the following ixtfom atiow s Streams: N; meC la ification s lakes or Ponds: Marne C.W. fi tion Wetlands: Name Wetland No.(if regulated by:DEC) r, Are any of the abovk water bodies listed in the most.recent tompilation of N S%rooater quality-impaired [erbod es? If yes,rte of impaired water bodytodies and basis for listing as impaired:mm I,is she project site in a designated Floodway? j,is the project site in the 106year floodplain? jyes i s kr is the proicvl she in the:500 ym lr°loodptuin? 1.Is dw project sitelowW Over;or immediately stl olniny,a primmy,principal or soft source agail' ? Ifyes: i.�artte c�Ce�it'a�: 1>3ge 1,1 of 13 M I&nHfy the pre&MiftaM v6ldlife species that m."py or use the project site: No ta.Dm the project site contain a designated significant natural community,,, if lies. 1 Describe heaitaioo trttunht y(composition.f4action,and his for designation): zr.. taut s�� . � €��n or�aivaeonT iii- EMent of ccstnmunityfttabitat: • Currently: acres Follow ng Completion of projact as proles acus Gain or loss(indicatt 4 or=1, acre% 0.Do .project site contain any.species sof plant.or animal that is listedby the federal g(wertnment or'f YS as: O Ye o endangered or threwerwd,or does il. ntain any areas Wntified as habitat for an endangered or threafted species? P. Does the PrOjea site contain:any sees of plant or animal that is lisW by.NYS as ram or as a species of Y N sial concern? is 4.is the przai€et site Or 40ining»tea cumntly used for hunting,t p ng,fishing or shell fishinei If yes,give a Wief dcscripticm ufhow the propsastd action M.Ay meet that usr, Designated Public Resources On or Near r;eel Site a.is the jt site,or any p€arliort of its located in a dcsilpated agdcultural diict cev'tirted ptmto oye, ORta Agriculture and Ma kits Laws Article 25-AA,SWion 343 and 3 If Yes, provide county plass district name-number; .. b.Art a0eultural landsrisisiing ofs? �`es�n .highly productive veils pies � r. If Yes:acreagos)o project site? lf;Sour si of$oil rating(s): C. 06cs ti> pr—oicct site contain all or part of,or is it substantially contigum to,a registered'National 5eso3r o Nlatuml LAndmark? If Yes: Mature of the rMural landmark:. 0 Biological Community (:1 Gctatogia Feature Vii. Provide brief"description of landmark,including value%behind designation and approximate s%xe�e?rtettt: d.is the prgjmt sive lorait4in or do s it actj iia a salate'lista l ritirai Environmental Arm'? ff) "rs�No. if laes l: CEA name., U,Hasi%rot _..---- _ __-_-------..-.._---___ ..........-._.� _ ----- ... ii, Dmignatirsg agency Page 12 of 13 C.Does the.Pray site GMWA,at is it sabstantialiy sono oom to,a balwing..archmk*ai sitc,or districtW&TO which is listed on,or hn been nominated by the NYS Roard of Histeric Prewvatioo for incittsiort on,the Shale or Natiotial Register of Historic Piar&s? If Vase r'. hitt n ofhistoridar*m1a icai rmo= Qmdmeologiral Sid C Histarlc Building or Diond V.N&M. W.iia ofdtiscription ofaltributes on which listing is fwd: .. f.is the project site,orany poen of iL kwzted In or adjacent to an area heti as sensitive for OYtsoN a areeogical sites on the NY Stow fiistodo Preservation Office(SHPO)atchawfogical site inventory' ga.Hare additiaml archaattaE*cal,or historic sfte(s)or resources b=i ntified ou the,prnieet site? OYC50 its Ifs" i. Describe Possible resource(s): . A Hasis for idm ifitow it.is tlse pmjoa site w"athixt fives mites efany.offix is lly de s!V*ted aW publicly=es.ible WAMI std,or tcrc;ai Ye>s�a aic or aesthete r"W `.' If Yrs° i.Identifjr msource. ii.Nature of,or basis fbr.deftnation(e g.,t%tablWhed highway overlook,sta#e of iocal park,.st>atc Wsttaric trail at seenic iiw,v. ems.): IM DWaam iituvaea—project t0oance: miles. L Is the project site locate'Within a designated river corrrdorr ander the Wifs Scenic wid RouvUlioraal rivets Y. NO Pmgrarn 6 NYCRR 666" If Yer i. fdenti the raac Oftlac river.aaad its desipation. g is rhe activity cons6terrt with deureloptwta?r restlic(lom con irzed in�YCRR Part 666`t OYesoNo F.A#ititttoml lx&nnatiun Attach any additional infen nation Whidh MAY be need tv clarify yorar Prealect. if you laavre identifwd my a dvcm impacts which could be associatod with Your PMPOP31,prem dvsmft thaw impacts plus any mewares which you propow to maid or ntbaimize then. G. Verifiesom I certify that the inforrnatkm;provided is true to the best:of tray kta cdgc. AppiicwWSponsor Name Alyk Signature �N-r FORM Page 13 of 13 T Map`Summary Rt; rt Thursday. May 2t 2015 10;17 AM .: A . x DIS �a a 5915 - aua�fa+rnc ). 9s3r�Ow CA. Fa [r 'E4 d !X21 93 a # f� 7■ i9 Uapokr.AdekWftw shy tF� �Mapw s dye by 4"U"ft EAF WOVMk*��� 27 1 g . �`"'' *€a esti to pioC'3lgs�t s�rokt�' e�ryta�a dix�idar . ... u 3 10 OMM 4M M WVOded by ft MBPW.04OW daW 4 mat a 41 Rv. # iEfk 6Jt6 for "{wiFtY4iRl£4!?f8. .1 1174,45 1 4 � P..:� 144} 274-33 , iI iyfY�, ti, ?,,ry,,irk,�'" �y 54 i �+ �_ 9 ?T °- 4 ,._ ate• t 41-:2V',:91-2'3 ii7:ir �i.2 I s h 4A. Tit'€24 fi 3k � 1� —. F tfiF I a ra �6F 141 1 ff,E�rK� a� i •ISL yg _ :4'� w . ..,...,�.....r-"`��Y -. .... ........ .. .. ........... - •�4. �. 3-3.� ......:. .,.t net# B.0 1008&lal or Waterfront.Areal :leo . . .. _.......... 810 f Local Waterfriont Revitalization Areal No ._...-. _ _.-. ...... ...................... C.2.b.[ laecfel Planning l7rstitct] digital mapping data and r5ai awailat or era com iete.Rafe W X41 _.. _ . .... Workbook, 'EA h PEC Spills or Rennediation Site- Digltal mapong data are not mailable or are incomplete.Refer to EAF Poterttiel Contamination Histrrry] Workbook, ........ ..._..- :1 hi(DEC Spills or,Rerrtediatiort Site» ®i ital mapping ng clefs are not available or are incomplete. Fier to EAF Listedted Workbook, E..1,tkJ[DEC$pills or Rernediation Site Digital wrapping data are not available or are incomplete Refer to EAF Environmental Site Remediation Database] Workbook. ............ 1E.1.h.ifi[Within�2,000'of DEC Rer**diation No ........ .2.9 niqua geologic Features] No E.2.h.i[surface Water F'eWums] No 1=.2.h.ii ( irfaee Water Fwdures) No . . ..... ......... ..... ... ........... . ._._—............ .. ... .. .. .................. E.2.h.1ii[Surface Water Features] .No _.:.:...:.:................................................................. E.2.lt:v[Impaired Water Bodies) NO ....................................... E.2,i,(FloWvvayj ;No ....... E_2j,[100 Year Floodplainj No _.. ._� _- ............................_.._.. ____.. E.2.k.(500 Year Floodplain[ tNO ............ .. ... E.2.1. [Actulfem�] :No - .. E.z n. [Natural Communities) No - E,2.o.(Endanger or Threatened species IVa W. -.................. E 2 , [l re Plants orAnimals] No E. a......... Aor ltural Distnot] No Fill Environmental Assessment Form-EAF Mapper Summary Deport r E.U.(National Naturae Landmark) No - - E,3.d[ rte Envirow,ental Area) No _... INatiortad Register of H4storio P laCesj DOW mapping data are not avaitabte or are incomplete. Meter to EAF ...... . ..... ... ... Workbook. E.V.[Archeological Shea] ;No E 31(�signated River�i r rj IVa Fuf Environnrentat Assessment Form-EAF Mapper Summary Report 3 BOWMAN PLAZA MIXED USE RESIDENTIAL / RETAIL ri FEDERICO 80 BOWMAN AVENUE assoClaTEs VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK WESTCHESTER COUNTY BOWRIDGE NEW YORK REALTY LLC PARCEL DATA Een WCEu�ODURT E ZONING GI SSRI CF GI N FIG n 6cRI 1 VOD RP WL vlLucF"llr 3ROOF TAX,MAP G=�I�NATIUN- O,IaI- h lF 1 5 f_G BOWMAN 1E1 CQUNI,N OWNER/APPLICANT PLAZA 51%VR O�E'Ek TY LLC. 7 4RUCC IIILL COURT I'LL^SANT�'I LE.^i E'N YCXK I0570 BAMEHP CE AYE EBOOE,NY COVER SHEET w wP \r 9g rw SIGN SIGN ` LOCATION MAP z BOWMAN AVENUE ELEVATION 1 MTS OF II 5 � m U o m m c � o c = U o U Y 0 3 FEDERICO TD BANKy ASSOCIATES C7 � aS„ y � S o N/F U TD BANK Al ti a a a z O 4 ZONE -1 BREALYE FLLC j S. 0. H. ASSOCIATES Filed Map Lot 2 Filed Map Lot 5 NE 0 CLEANERS a Edge or As nan o N” �W 80 to �PA�r ',r>=vice NO910530"W b rSANTMN.Y.1 t4"MA PIEA6ANfVHLB,00UHT570 2s°MAPL Stockade lerwre - w 7 T_—.-i 4 0 I°57'20"W AP — e MAPLE NO9°OS 3O'W 41.03 � r,- ---- - I — 5—_ eo°M PLE_ ,�`�� � � � \ � �o �ti°� It- PLe vx 8'TREE © 12'MAPLE APLE�9, x v 24yTREE/� o W z Q BOWMAN c� I; Im N a IA I,TW TREE 8•MAPLE X96— `' ��� 1 PLAZA N °11 °U°d Ilo Im na�A 1 N 1 A N 'X o / 3 g z�u� AOU - 3 U ROx 0 `�[I �\ Q 1 a� 1°"MAPLE ,� o V IOb y l t B)Btlua'J O N N I 14'MrnT LE 0 o j ry ( \� -L a .u, A a�* �c� o °x \ O 12"MAP m ^ 1 p? �Q uoo � `a" 1 v94� gc \ gs a mQ e•oW TRE m��g ° �6 x \ o I V A c S� �i ��z HAPMRe CE y X L2'MAPLE a vE> I ftY6 B600K,N.Y. v� v _ 1 SOIL U _�� Y `ZK, �As,o 1 a RT R Fu i N t' ��.4.Ebt- 1 882' uk��s.x fie 2y 1`o t' : .M L99' IIti I N PANTON L_ C-I :�� C-I C "i C: F :a fl 1 C; ,y Is•TWASH X / _ i l '( ❑ °, 1 zoN z �;M� --au,�nL don pale �x v MAPL LAOIS_ u o` 8u �R �� o I a v I Nx e / , v v ��> 1 EXISTING o � _R�� — X X� Q v v v o CONDITIONS uj p� y RIA ¢ I 1 1 o.v �o 'x,i � EE. _ � �C�, a' ;jk V iC:U� C>t�u I \ ` W— I CII C` o°I°CI, a�W I rM,C• ) .y t o I I N \ 1� - N N v ZORE 0 1 t -1 � a 7.get,1 a°c w� 1 ss�es�o 4i X X \ cssx) u W a ` v �.aJ _ /�im odPooM M 1 - 13.35' L....uroob, J'yJ,/-0 1�1 °' of—a FIs-OAK `9e� /-X o° 1 U mon B 1 _ �x / N � 1� o° N ryna m I' m L4" RIMAP Ez � �1"El>' (v x" 33`�'ao�lll'011 °` �m�-OJL�`�r`Y'yl 10 b°' 6b I� �) O 9�\ x� �`\ 9 X </ � 6 MAPL U o^6 oma- ._... .w....... �ljN _ I 1 IHI QI �' I� x 1 a, 4l wl 9"O9 A�019 90.60 u� X00 Oil M�,O£ASOo6 � o I° B9�Sb I�� �� d �O£SOo6O s" TREE a, e —_ e•MAPL e s6— NI 9 �gx S \ \ L4' E c'o�3 o S ���3 Bnup �Gi�n3�'�,TR � �"-I 4 .X� 6� PX � � l \ all sees dt govdrV 1 ml a h"` a m= csros uovdrowaep3 .i RMt=9<M� 95.28 Aspholl Curb Asphalt Curb 1, a yuawenod llovdsv ° - .'' Inv.Out-90.65 p°K °, f 3g a �a �' BARBER PLACE ---_`--------- 1BARBER P C g q� aS �• �o"a°y , ��o J, LA E ° 0 c v Asphalt llovdrylo a5p3 Curb PLAN - 2 � � o v�� fdlF:l•-la �'-�o � z c; 11111111 U.A'1:\1.\I,LIV I R11\111RPI:111 FIlll\'Intit'- g (1F II M ERRILL'I,S.IJ4TFIl APRII./I 2010. � 0 ZONING DATA I ZONING PISTR­ C� ­l­NT­ El---I L ri FEDERICO TD BANK a ASSOCIATES E ................... E BOWRIDGE REALTY LLC m I @WCE HH1 COURT 0�4 PLAZA RYE RMNY, PROPOSED 3 STORY MIXED USE 777 MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL/ D VISION RETAIL WITH PARKING BELOW STREET PRELIMINARY SITE TABLEPLAN &ZONING TL & 4�"o, 1A hl BARBER PLACE ONE WAY PLAN 3 OF [I ZONING DATA 1 ZONING MIST—T CN R—D-1— TH cj El--- soluj L FEDERICO �l 17 TDjBANK a ASSOCIATES E III IN 1­7 BOWRIDGE REALTY LLC MWCE BILL,00URT Il 14 ELGIAN BLOCK CURB, Ix BOWMAN L (TYPICAL) PLAZA 9 1 3 5 6 7 8 10 I I BARBER PLACE 11 SUILZING MOUNTED 71111— pig (C= _F4 _F �o 6 PROPOSED 3 STORY MIXED USE N. 6 MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL/ 5 DIVISION RETAIL WITH PARKING BELOW STREET 5 PRELIMINARY 4 —BELGIAN BLOCK CUPS. SITE ITYMAL) (C I LAYOUT PLAN 4 &ZONING orae I7 16 3 W,� iii 15 14 11 ,U12 11 2 TABLE 2 ------- ------- I F SIGN,ADD171ONAL j -------- ---------------------------- -------------- ----------------- .............. --------------------- ------------------------------ DC NOT ENTER- FIRE SOOESS ONLY. OE WAY DOUBLE-SIDED SIGNS. - BARBER PLACE —STING .....7 ... —N-1. AN""MINI ­­N 7.MATCH ySCALE:1"-IQ vIAAAGe o I N Sy hole YL` 4 'y_ OF II LEGEND —•—•—•—•—•—•—PROPERTY LINE WATER SERVICE s� SEWER CONNECTION PROPOSED SEWER MAIN rL 0 STORM DRAINAGE m Wi CATCH BASIN ` to Aaaa=vo FEDERICO SEE DETAIL SHEETS 9 OF 10 aw7�alo,H • MANHOLE TD JBANK a ASSOCIATES SEE DETAIL SHEETS 9 OF 10 p p u+. .-'"�•p�i,ilii„ a TROUGH DRAIN w z SEE DETAIL SHEETS 9 OF 10 LIGHT POLE 5EE DETAIL SHEETS 8 OF 10 INSPECTION PORT BOWRIDGE SEE DETAIL SHEET 8 OF 10 W R LLC Y a IMWCE1 WNtT U_ � Xloos2n _______x 012094.x0 - — 94.91Ts� TyN.e brio w 96,38 1 J;K x 93.68 93.6 T 94.�. BOWMAN z PLAZA s x 93.61 W e FennAa III Inv mea 3 x� TREneli oRan v`m II HAMCE RyEa P my, noRl�a unir t w RIn 10050 3 E> r z6 AYE eft00K,N.Y. 94.12 �onry :". Inv.our 99.00 T. s o e 3oa V nv.In 4 9 = ^swTT'bem4 ' t I as I I I o s n.Ts °s* T b PROPOSED 3 STORY MIXED USE PROP b 1" I I I I I I ' =oar DRAW nuEr yes MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL/ �ISIO x nv1 ou"1 ee:i1 lI li RETAIL WITH PARKING BELOW ' ° ° ° iO zx -ST N �I ', EET PRELIMINARY 3� ,h FF 1015 1 0 a,HOPff 93MF 920 UTILITY s nv�IN aai 21 - PLAN NI 1111 - I F� i I I I I I o .our 6a.6> iw o6r ea�llzl o w IF IF IF Iv Iryv.In 3 gl o . 3X27 ' m w. O -T-1 �oV Eo—�� z T 94-p2 '�u .IN J35 °T In In IfiV.IN 3l 371x axoRAmRl. v g v .00`4m i 1 ------- .masa - --- --------------- --- ----------�.�---- ---��;-- `t;, 4Y+,, wl a' e h -Lm cRe e m Kis a x �1 oE_ral�J X- C TE , ou•fin _ 3.570 mos z 9389 --" ° E9ro5 st _ " T` -- 95. ,1PR0 17 MP a f w Existg l0 a Ex 9 89' Ex Wa ter Manwne x Cb ° a stg 8 Wat�M ' Existg 10 Clay, °` JI BAR PLACE ONE WAY g a 3ewe� —OR�6 awa, �.. -ZU-T woEn Ao3oREM - „ R a FR ovE E�orloE;8° 46.E nHR.T��Re. � R _11MR. RI 9 �966o SITA L o INV,40.66 IRYv.In 9300 6 CURD AHO RAVEME INI ma6.31 E�Sii I6"CMPFxISTma im.OUT 1s1as E o nn�.TO HATCH _ _�_ - 5 PLAN �o� EE CtlpCllbdbM n 5 oI F w F>' RI h101.9] Rim=94.71 ce of r Inv.In>89.86 6CpL8:I'=IU vlL�n v,�_ Inv.but--84.81 OF s OF 11 � �EGENI� TREE PROTECTION NOTES: Average Grade CalculatiaH PH aRms arvo ---'---PROPERTY LINETy r,uLAnon,veeunmuzr saAoms vncums nrzea ta,rg n eg vg 2 consreucrlorv,eucoms cor vRevaRanon,era.. EXISTING CONTOUR Grade Grade Abn Wall Lea �1 PROPOSED CONTOUR 9251) 9251) 200 9250 14% 1.w ao vnaulns novenenr of woReees oR nnc"mezr oe ourtvino of consrzucnory ceaels nory eouivnervT ve"Gce Z� 95.50 9600 200 95]5 1363 1]050] EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN 96.00 97.00 2.00 96.50 28.63 2,762.80rHe oaiv cores or occ T-oz Teees. ""�� msraLLea.mans oR anzRleRs,"ALL ee El_P ours 97.00 99.00 2.00 90.00 d3.54 4.2%.92 (�1 100.50 101.50 2.00 lo1.00 18.00 1.818,00 coneTe6"Na. �nsITeATT«eeeeln III F�oNeT4,-NANTPeeNAlnmrcA�7,P1Ilo-1 1 e SEE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION EXISTING TREE TO BE PROTECTED 101.50 101.30 2.00 101.50 4087 4890.07 SEQUENCING NOTES ON SF-IEET LO. SEE DETAIL SHEET 8 OF 10 101.50 101.25 2.00 101.30 6.00 600.25 \� 10135 101.75 2.00 101.50 6.00 609.00 1,consreucrion ve¢ioo. a TReE vaoTecran neasurzes sNAcc ee nonlrocEP nnP nalnrnmeP TnaourNour Tre 101,75 101.75 2.00 101.75 30.21 3 09m7s reae,ouems T"e oeowmc se<son.FOR aT EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED 101.75 101.50 2.00 101.83 8.00 608.75 01.59 01.50 2.00 101.50 6.00 609.00 eoeT 311-NI-1--7-10 1-11n 11 onsTe ran. FEDERICO - 11 SILT FENCE 99.00 94.50 2.00 98.75 61.80 5,906.89 SEE DETAIL SHEET R OF 10 9450 g2b0 2.00 93.50 22.00 2057.00 ncTviTies sHncc ee inneoinTecr eevcaceo To THe'71-__or THe rcunGmac.rtr. 'cceo ev consT¢ucrion ASSOCIATES SSO(I^TES L_J CATCH BASIN AND INLET PROTECTION 91.76 81.75 21)0 97.75 2180 1926.75 = t1 1. Y1 SEE DETAIL SHEET 10 OF PO 92.50 9250 200 92.60 29.67 2,T44A8 -c 4 STABILIZED CC 371J=CN ENTRANCE _ T 35 19 SEE DETAIL SHEET 10 OF 10 8. / 34,101.58 1,1 Fbar Avela9e 93.61 EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION Elevaaan G,� _ x 101. - 9742 - 6.08 10'MAP E x o PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION B.idin HEI h1 CEICuIaIIOB BOWRIDGE A-m Grade 106,,1 C,i 4110 w REALTY LC 3551 1st Floor to Mean Roof Bk' He'h 39.59 40 W ft 10"MAPLE E to �j I'd9 '/6PROCE HOL WOftT /^/, �.T PIEA6ANfVW,E,N.Y.10570 s 26"MAPLE 94.10 s s 0eo (jT�S 94.91 - 5T 3 93 6 boe� __ o�e o,�x w BOWMAN ,� N 7ss�sor 'gs_- �g4 _/ 3_61 y �1 �� o-� iV GOIYSTRUGTIO � oL17 qq PLAZA X y 10 32 \94- 6AR6EftPWCE BYE am N.Y. x 4� _ 94.12 - xmoi �o z v ( X LP POSED 3 ST6RY Mi�ED USE i "y ULTI-FAMILY REgYDENTYAL/ ^T\ \ DIVISIO 22 22e X� � A STREET PRELIMINARY �EOTAIL Wl I H PARKIT46 BELOW r�v i 101 �„n I�� �ET GRADING/ BSMT `920� � X � � � o•� A 111 � SEDIMENT COTL EROSION TREE PP OT CTION oT STABI IZED 3 LAN 4 R'EENTA'NGE m g5 v X:m.00 �X V '�14'S6X ° too / r � rr T,2/ m 8_ oso o aoeo Ix ea 2 1 T ml m 6k 6 \1 9� 1® aeon z _TJJ ____ 98 X -- 6 m 7 x m N m r f; wio _ _ ____ z weErLRoao z� w eom z a 93 93.89 � csros ��� a, -_- ��nero s�5� en � XX El� � BARR�PLACE ONE waY wloEry .....BT x Re. I-- � 1111 Ano'.'MA, nr a s on Ta NAT PLAN SCALE:1'40 GRASS SW LE of li KEY SY_NBOL NAME QUANTITY SIZE ANI ANTLRMAPTF _ _,'CAL ACER CA o CRAB LE R l i'CAL MALUSAPPSP. KC ❑ KWANZAHCHERRY 5 2.5'(AL O w0 wIIITF OAK 5 2, CAL QU " ERCUS ALBA O COI IMAH0 SPRUCE (:S PICIA PUNOEVS �� 0 CJ JUNIPPRUI IORI]ONTALIS �� 2C4L g FEDERICO JL I[Fx 64 2'-4' TD BANK ASSOCIATES L.T UPIUGH'I IUNIPER 12 4'-6' A-c��orL lornr.... 'TI" .IUNIPERUS 10°MAP E BOWRIDGE 1 1 1 W REALTY LLC C CA wo wowo 0•MAPL _ rMa,CEITIH OOI>aT f Nuc `'GANG TI.A,X PIEA6ANTVW,E,N.P.1p5'/0 26° PLE 14" LE - - - N. W �� ❑ � :<�_ _�--- - -Z� Z � BOWMAN -- z PLAZA 2 T 1 3 wo KC UJ i RYER P1,ACa 3 Nv UJ avaeaoa 1 CA .W .a 1 KC PROPOSED 3 STORY MIXED USE MUCA DIVISIOjv LTI-FAMTLY RESIDENTIAL/ 1 L�j, RETAIL WITH PARKING BELOW ^ 'STREET PRELIMINARY Kc 1 LANDSCAPE i CA PLAN U3 24•TRE CA ILEX I - - - -- j cI �--- 1 1 I wo _ AM Cg CA KC CA KC CA ❑ BARAR PLACE ONE WAY PLAN 7 MAIF:r-1a OF 11 �^ M Cultec 330 HD Recharger System tiE�tiv.111. 9 5 H OOFR 1 cgioSUN ® v mm CULTEC RECHARGER 330XLHD CHAMBER SYSTEM sEg 1n°°` � iw 1i0 PAVED TRAFFIC APPLICATION TYPICAL CROSS SECTION DETAIL 2-0"5 UA a , PLAN �a mcH waswEo au coMPncho nu - . L—A E oP ua .oah` as a. DETAIL OF .. r cH<naea ASPHALT PAVEMENT REPLACEMENT ^4'"'x z �axm9e FEDERICO w° � om. eu�.•, OVER TRENCH � ASSOCIATES . m�.e SECTION A a -r.•d �,.EFl.acE,.ER a= . omm oa.oa.w.cs m,w.'c.� NOTE'. DLL STRUCTURES LND CLSTINGS SHLLL BE °9 CAPABLE OE FILO LOAOINGBOWRIDGE oNPEg �`\\ REALTY ER JINTEaNALe°P N LLC SCORED CONCRETE SIDEWALK DETAIL OF CULTEC,Ina o x„s-<a,6 �CULTECContactor®andRechargerJ �� ASPHALT ON CONCRETE PAVEMENT P.O.Box zso 'vH:isooi ac�Lrec �'N Plast'�c SepC,and Stormwater Chambers 'HANDICAP PARKING ONLY”SIGN IN CONCRETE WE Federal Road Fx"w��I,'rE�'�o .rr CULTEC INSPECTION PORT DETAIL FILLED STEEL PROTECTION POST REPLACEMENT OVER TRENCH Cl.-I,J,CT DM--A ww (N"T�S.I 7RPRU®ImL COURT PLEaANTVW,E,NX..IV) �. Holophane RSL-35D SeFIesLNFl,IFlaIfe BOWMAN esld Rentlal Llghl'ng Post Top Max mum welghl 521bs C '•`"`.,"'•' gem o �'h— y� 16115 IXV DETAIL OF ASPHALT"DRIVEWAY & CONCRETE CURB a„� enxeERPwce PARKING AREA � "'`� `•� ` "%' "- RVERRooE,N.v. F.l ��nm .�.� I w.N,rM ,ama.x.` ...• �� _.., st.D��7 �.�-F• .., ,.�... ..R �,.��x. i Diu'.0 ( CONCRETE ORNEWAVlPRON DETAIL WRX SIOFNA_LK MRs �TFWE FMNG DETAI- BOWMAN AVE �s r CAI OR Ee _m.m DETAILS /� v rtn,m-.swwr`�'xccri norms inpc awin�oFln eDiDE 5 LExs 1NIN �J+ • w! loses a c ' Iw 8 1 hbg, p mE'.i..E. om+s sQU .a a u 0 FEnL sal. P DETAIL OF FIRE RHYDRANTm MIlV�N1B1111 IJ'S '� Ba&�g mem �m pupa em, , ® ONE N. rovmup --Hof mn wm u nae.,,Mm ft . . .�, �.. ._.._... WAY hmcm of Pr«emw a wine,bn nor.m RmJInR. 11,1 211 '� J sim4PJme mammal;smm of c �� §g � w mem.velJcle parFinR,mavemem of woAm w num.IM1�inery � E ' Pedomping of mnmu'Jun Jebds � ....,.w,.iK S j — � Treesmremain ilu^Ismfelso vaxs ave m(eay fem:mg anNw z..�. P ,c..,.. ` �N��e�,an� sm�D•„f aea { :€ r mmrS amu�pia a^6 m ' mnaide the MPR f I Ru Mai t nuexu � ti.•,r • min aiRn9-�yms�N a PmtnteJ ve emJon e � f �\ poMbnw xun inn z>M1allmDlxadm tie.w Im�emlvelmx m proms mmllorw aM be l v� . 1� �m�m. • mal Jumygm Jmamstmwm Derive. �� . -.•��- — .aun.s € ® Pmxud aces smR uGM esbaw ,mrm�+rno, �"c r tl u, s¢u wu.no .e.a .0 a a.oem • dmvmme mwitirn ave md— r •`. � _ h a(rs wmal<J o(mn � snuF 1 ••" ame>��.®� ,ssw�wry Isea�o,(o a[leas Jus erowirgaseasms after mmDlReJm of L w ONE WAY SIGN DETAIL �`r"^ Q DETAIL OF WATER SERVICE CONNECTION (SIM.TO FlRE IANE AND DO NOT ENTER SIGN DETAILS) D�m..ml ues damaRwmauw br mww.am amvwea alvei o r mimmwiamlY repUwdm Nesausfactipnot the mwiapaliry. LAMP POST DETAIL OF II • A I., IT- ----------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------- -—————————— rL — I w_l Ll FFF-I H FEDERICO ASSOCIATES ------ ---- L----------- �PPOQT -IIIL I-111-11 F L 1-1--SO 1-1 .... HE Hl iiiiii III III IEEE H . . DIUMESTER H Hill ENCLOSURE PLAN ---------- Illllk DETAIL BOWRIDGE DIUMESTER ENCLOSURE PLAN DIUMPSTER ENCLOSURE SECTION DETAIL .......... REALTY LLC aw 6OC lOY, GAR' "I IL-FII 7 SMUCE ML 00URT EE ILA''F SOLD LENALL AP—D BELGIAN BLOCK CURB TIH I'D DETECTABLE TACTILE FINISH SURFACE OF WARNING SURFACE flL SLOPES TO BE IN T_ E BOWMAN BY ARMOR-TILE A CORDANCE WITH ANSI ADA 11 1 2003, PFR ADA / PLAZA F` E`'EE FINISI _. I L E F3%%,E Il�ID`F MANUFACTURE SURFACE OF MANUFACTURER INSTALLED R ED Sp�C Tj N SLOPES TO BE IN IFICA o I E,­IETE ACCORDANCE WITH ANSI IE Soo 0 A117.1 2003. HAMEH�CE _1.S_IOYI M �I. — ��\ ELIES,�,IE Rw am NY SECTION A-A SECTION B-B SIDE VIEW TRENCH DRAIN NOTE, ALL STRUCTURES AND CASTINGS SYLAI_I_BE CAPABLE OF H2O LOADING. PLAN HIIE IONNEI- DROP CURB & RAMP ------ TN`lECl`TL 11AUNT S A �TEPI N, A DETAILS HIll IONN11— SECTION TONCULUN T 77-7_T IEIT EICl,"" ,:l 111 11,TER PLAN DROP CURB & RAMP DIANE I IIATE! AAMIBELL FO NDRI I., -Ml I I-I C-1 ....... NOTE: Highway Catch BOO!, FERd Curb Z KA­�01 ANIIIEI L 1. ED N 117 1,G,u,I. L �L-1 OR All—O _A 0�&TF SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE DETAIL ��,��Sj�,IHEAQ F-HER F�I­El IIADE ELEI NOTE, ALL STRUCTURES AND CASTINGS SH—BE CURB TYPE A CAPABLE OF H2O LOADING- BI FIR,ADIHITMENT IILTEI-EIFL­EL N.T.S. ATEII AT I 1AIT I"SOLD­�2LDCK .ErvEaA ..... Hary IR RILYRIA—­ "EAT .N"ETE A","EEL N ID`E'l'AlTNToA F., NIIETE A I A III I S, A IEE z I z 'L -0N Al 1IN-1 ...... 11HEI A �N� tisEEEA Y- ----------------- _:III 111ITIRE1 21 _E ­­­ I D:1 _DHE, TNNE ...... 5FE UTILITY m ELEVATIONS U7C:r=k:Lk=b7y —A roMNoenaN caur+sE PLAN FOR RAL/T T :oE �A�AACO` FRONT MEW SECTION A A SECTION A-A DETAIL OF FLAT SLAB LnEM REINFORCEMENT Q PRECAST CONCRETE DRAIN INLET DETAIL 9 UT OF SLAB Ii�HQEB TYPE A N.T.S. NTH SUMP OVERFLOW STRUCTURE NOTE. ALL STRUCTURES AND CASTINGS SF44LJ_BE NOTE. ALL STRUCTURES ES AND CASTINGS SHALL BE NOTE. ALL STRUCTURES AND CASTINGS aHAI_I_BE NOTE. ALL STRUCTURES AND C4571N15 SHALL BE OF [I CAPABLE OF H2O LOADING, CAPABLE OF H2O LOADING. CAPABLE OF H2O LOADING. CAPABLE OF H2O LOADING. GENERAL CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCING NOTES IL=,r�=r '�'�S ONES w'N h CE-F, PERCOLATION&TEST HOLE oArA� Prior m any earthwon:,pu e antral m boll be-,masa Ino ordonoe with nL,EN r.eNl, -L,Er r„anT PA,N11 orlon o the plans and malntalned In reffective condltlon u[hrough out the construction period. PERCOLATION TEST HOLE g1 WAS LOCATED 25 FEET OFF BARBER a,w I. Nwax 7" renucx ewwc "T""'F PLACE AND 20 FT.OFF THE L Install Constmct Dn Fence and SUIT F.hE,h, IVATs DRIEN MN 11 INI PROPERTY LINE,P1 WAS 36"DEEP,MED.BROWN COLOR,SILTY LOAM Stake penmeter of alta with o ange consMucbon s own,� t s owTn caourvu W IN fencing. �I� a INF N MODERATE COMPACTION DUE TO ITS LOCATION NEAR THE DRIVEWAY. Eros on Control Measure Y .,, - THE PWRC HOLE nstallat Dn Df sit tenc'ng ak khe dawn-gradient penmeter°(°II° os pmp°sed tar . . MIN TEST S STARTED AT 8:26 AND STABILIZED AT-2 WITH A RATE disturbance. In additiDn,tree protection shall be ns[e lied or°end trees tD be saved as per INSTALLATION NOTES r%' m �m www mymw w OF 2U MN.PER grading plan and deka Hl sneers 8&10. Prase vrw CH- AL 9'.22 PERCS WERE WITNESSES AND RECORDED. ME LEVEL 2,SCENIh ed Construct On Entrance as'MlN DENNE 111T 922 265" PFIO,t0 vegeta[io ve end/ar resredN,,feRIP-11-111pad a�„rrv.rsw,„�.n,raK„tam�mr„e„,�,.„�.r,„o.lin sv� FOGNIccsri FILE elNUMtLL 9:32 D” 20MIN/INCH shall be o cted In conformance with the eteds and location dlustratetl on he .w.Y Mw oarmw ar re )'min FILTER ctom F'Mw. 9:34 25.5” app,n ed°plan _ — aLD GaeFrvF 9 44 2d5 2D MIN/INCH FEDERICO s ry ury 9:555 24.21' 40 MN/INCH”(MAY HAVE MADE A MISTAKE ON aegFete do§ f trance m u IMS ols NrAL DEPTH READING) ASSOCIATES -Thee San Orbe bens erd('edn at edegreded per,edea y t°remove bu t coPss is and ry < 9:57 215” sea men can[me��pper ayers�m ensu e proper rung on'ng. IP INLET PROTECTION �r`T°”°r”' Io:07 22" za Mw/wcH NTS CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS 1o:og las DESCRIPTION 1o:19 21" 20 MIN/INCH 3 Clearing o cetation R Tau v T ua T Aapwpoo. USE 21-30 MN ATE _ The on tractor r the existing vegetation witNln the II-Its of dlsturbnnce!pr the proposed ...r..m etre, PERI TEST P12 WAS LOCATED ZD FEET OFF THE BACK PROPERTY nen-u,npn,e 11dmgenAisting trees flagged m r CNP ad b,Meh and trees mat a Vled OFF 't°„Z.G,nn. .e.r 9 t.e"0�,9,a�,h. ,'ENE N AA w ryCAR, uNE AND zs FEET OFF Infer use as mine,Ar Na°I OIf site&dispose a p ope,ly. Grub root syAl-A and swmpsreW zEl/z au,Aa°unnMuFVmEsry pscrvlrve THE AT C,ADE FENCE. P2 wAs 36 INCHES DEEP AND WAS MED BAoWN SILT LOAM. PERC 4 Rough Grading fo ,kine A ear/Building Stites ulanrl x, LTTHEI ITUR x, TEST WERE STARTED AT 8:32 AND A STABILIZED RATE OF 10 MINS. MAINTENANCE I N /INCH WAR BOWRIDGE The contractor shall c ougF grading At the p sea p king a and building site'-eluding P CHIEVED T 9;06, THE PERI RATES WERE RECORDED AND depositing and compact ng eo arm I ,the pgrE,ing°p "hHpF HRn of fill a ” be rrara nrva MnHralnL nru0 w1 IN Pis sTARTINc AT �] n 12"Ilfts and IFFFF ted to 111 densityps DurAg c nstrucli,n,th,contractor shall ensu Fe etfiat all 9,24 TIME LEVEL REALTY stormwater withln the construction areas Is being contained on sH1e" ne..m..rAENT 9'24 19,5" LLC Erosion Control Measure SILT FENCE 9;34 20.5" 10 MINS/INCH 9:3fi 19" AHI newly graded areas shall ba stabilized with,pp,opriat,vegetative cover and/Ar mulch.Contractor 9;487 20" 11 MIN/INCH shall ensure that adequate silt fencing i,In place and fi-b Fning p,apedy during earthmoving actiNtles. 9;48 187" Soil Stockpiling 9:59 18" 11 MINS PER INCH 76PR0®ImL WART �nIaTA on2-Le TE rvslsur USE PERS RATE OF 11-11 MINS PIEA6ANTVRLE,N.Y.10573 DEEP TEST HOLES 1 AND 2 WERE B FEET DEEP CONSISTING OF 5_Final Gradin,D4 Pad:in,Areas and Driveway TYPICAL URBAN SOILS. r The contractor shall commence flnal grading of the parking area Includlng me grading for the z'TArvE INSTU SOILS WERE NOT CLEARLY DEFINED BECAUSE THE AREA HAD subbase. xm rcmanm maven Tse stn PAcrx BEEN DISTURBED IN �smom ass THE PAST THE SOILS NOTED WERE MED BROWN SILT LOAM WITH BOWMAN Erosion Control Measure _ wins uE H AREAS OF LIGHT GREY e..o o SANDY SILT WITH TRACES OF CLAY. ND ARCED WATER WAS Contractor shall e re that all sit fencing is functioning properly while parking area and driveway PRESENT BUT THE BOTTOM OF PLAZA grading progressessu >PNPJ F E 1-I THE HOLE NEAREST THE ROAD WAS MOIST WITH MOTTLING AT 65 TO PLAZA e Dranage and ut ty Can strvcton xl6,urn Irv, 7 FEET. AN OLD After the peaking er away has been graded,t installatlon of ■ sF\ SEPTIC SYSTEM WAS ENCOUNTERED IN THE MIDDLE OF THE AREA parking a drveweyd Sdorm dHPN B9e facilities and utdhles In accordance ,11h the e,g,,C,F[ng �.�.4� s exss anunn .�.�s� AN— delalis and mendufecD—T,Specifications- srarvc RARREHP CE Eros on Con[rF M i ftYE eR001'N Y While[r Hing operations far d nage a left open D might eL oa..o s�wm o„,e n anpprapriate sed erosiond< an eplocesIf t nF,p,,,,p,tFtiDn e 1s�(ra EE°T tR INTIAu appropriate duet pond practN- I� Hmplemented s that s uta on bypass the vnm aasmreu�mm sewaF�m wg�nnm t,e cN and[be safely conveyedslt,the drain HNIFs and drain inlet protection�h allw be Hnsmlled- i z.a were ywlmmy .�m ms�u.o s1 s auxl.w i.svuw+s-Ines VnaY wwumuemunwwa. 7.Construction,f Dwellings CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS same,claw The Cnh,ct,r shall commence construction o p,posed dwellHngs.Grade land to new el,vations shown n T a ro cI un un - Rya amok N^y YOM on the plans. nIL se DDrvsrwcTfn or z.a Dorvslreucnsry Pa ea taken fil2N2J13 Erosion Control M Pale no a:nes cono-eaVF shall, ,e mat p v,d snt fe m m,p meter or mA dweum m n A la aeMaA� se lith« �1ng is ,i g. swa area,taste nae= rasa s.r. addition,all r m Ne tlwellin grdp II be s f,lyn.....v,d t,Us d,pin mists.Im N,,lately - I hawing establishment pf th,grad,At dIF,sa-I,RF,ANl nd seed with sp,,Ifl,d seed m1,and mwch SNniICW apo Me bin 21 inmates wah hex INLET ANI Nstn IN sec's FY IANNIAcs IF ALTRINATf-RHM. Vo ams Ntlmp= O.CQ91 o.E OalRara=al,aaamlaa..= o�2..M,11— DETAILS 8 Acohaltc Bnder&Too Course Pavement 0.398 e.E/a.", The contractor shall commence and complete p ving,f the parking ar as and driveways In CURB DROP INLET gaaume 25%cl cord-A with the approved plane. Shoulders shall be backtlllAd andetlnal graded to conform PROTECTIDN ad9e9 racror 0.260 c.r./a�Uday UBE THIS PERO ROTE wlm approved gh.ding plans. 1� �mm a erase Srcet,9lorege upesllyr L.I.' 11.16 e.r./kf. Once the binder Cou se has been completed,stormwater will be able to enter the Catch basins 6kawall area far laywtahaxn= P(RIx MIII I and dran mets and be conveyed through the d nage system. Sn-the catch barn rm will �e Paflmelerx Hepnt of abm 110 38.5 _511,1 a �ry be set at a hgher elevat on than the tinder course sever on the contractor veil have to ensure oWT"L MeuT TEp� the water enters the catch barn grates Thr can be accompl shed by ether temporarly n. a bkvrd abmrytlon-n 3a aoura fibs armxpw rak 129e[ _Lv1 ty YWt1 oving the curb piece from me catch b n Name°r temporarily bull ding up Ue asphalt to N J vTANVI1 BEwd res anw lm the rim elevation on the high side of catch darts. Uh, DLDm Paorw peNoln= propme9= 19.E94 a.f 9 Vaaetate Ste as aESDEunAL Esdistu tabish vegetation in all rbed areas In accordance with proposed plFnting plans. Furl, 10-Rem e Exc s Sed mens y ° r ���ai� 25®reform IE— A 6.9D in. fter the rte hos n amp - d IF t° a er ra n°ge s pervt'Dnal, w11—ENTEa s-c" "ave gwO wMaon = 3 Bin. D,eked sed men is shall b d fro ea Adjacent LD dthe sit fe g p-r to p^u vr�y Net ncr¢as mEr P2 iry remev ng tF ... er sm accv-voted sed mems sh posed Df at appr°Iede°c,ton,cepL°b leq--p went°tve C IN mnaa --tC E CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS ,erase tee_n,mwn.a a19ewNI NNomna" <au�er Nal lnc J. A 11 PART U L sF'F.,C N A SN_Nes Dene LFT wneN' LKgn a reeha,9erreWrvU mtlmmese I Gutta,apalry= 31211 rPIC ERwliw B.,,11 Meec1 1.00 LE V.pDERB.-red-Ua 1l,Nqm Eff.La1111 ms Rar'o ss arm ENIHIati �` cA o,fN Y FVTHAUA 11,FFM r INILF SOF NE{yy —-L IF PuceD VILA HE CHINA AREA PN ore IF Puc NI roP OND F, 21 IMpa<n s as f r.J. a n a rsi RE VA�Nlll �IFFBENT T 1 A A rv��IFF AAA�AAANAFNLITI ARAA�AA EA:� 10 STABILIZANNE ED P P G cDNSTRucnoN can�,a Na .ron<1css- OF II ENTRANCE • u �p m w'a um El��w996 ARE ELEV I RA S9TE V EITVABLE AcuRB- rL IS71NG2 99.0 ELE V.99 0 4� E FEDERICO RROEILE ASSOCIATES EASTERLY APPROACH TD BANK TD BANK i T"11BOWRIDGE — — — — �' / — — — — REALTY 199 199 a N.Y.10 %EA6ANTVW�E,N.Y.IfS70 o, s o s o .11+soo o-lj -AFRW flRE do WRkkel b&L f RE Inn 30.0 1l AWARAW ARA us BOWMAN ACCESS ROA v`"i ACC R A PLAZA i c 0 BARBER PLACE 1911 / 101 ftYE eR001'NY DIVISION DIVISION 191 r F--� STREET 191 ,o r�-� STREET ca 0 xF AERIAL FIRE X � i, sex — X� �6X _ APPARATUS 99 �� loo o ACCESS PLANS � o oA SII G 'REAR 1 - 6U 2� .4T REA 99 ` 99 Y RJ J£e Y ...........V...._�. DO NOT ENTER-FIRE O REAR _ DO NOT ENTER-FIRE E PLACE 7EnTErvo To REA�RJ /� — pCGESS ONLY. PLACE ExTENo T AD�ESS OINLY. ONE YY A 1 <v� DOUBLE-SIDED SIGNS. O*TE Ax A" DOUBLE-SIDED SIGNS. PLAN—WESTERLY APP OACH YY 1 PLAN—EASTERLY APP OACH SCALE: °=10' SCAM I'=10cl ' z 11 OF 11 FEDERICO ASSOCIATES W W a MAX ROOF 13].42 BOWRIDGE noQ 4 RELLC Y 0 0 ~ PftECE HIL ODUftT %EA6ANTV W.E,N.Y.Ifd70 Ful2 0 0 BOWMAN IDID PLAZA W :::]]=El Ell El BAREEft P1,ACE L � � � ftYE eft00E,N Y Q �umxssnre swsv.ww. Q m o SIGN SIGN Q BOWMAN AVENUE ELEVATION F�5T a E BOWMAN AVENUE ELEVATION SCALE:I/4._l"T 2 Al OF FEDERICO ASSOCIATES a "'X R°°F 3r4z BOWRIDGE J RELLC Y 0 76PROCE IML WORT PIEA6ANTV W.E,N.Y.Ifd70 BOWMAN o PLAZA ❑❑ � ro RARREftPWCE � Q �usftYEftNY ara,u 4 BARBER PLACE m MUM ELEVATION 1° Em�� L E BARBER PLACE ELEVATION SCALE:I/4._l"T A2 OF h ------------- -11 � F L------------------- --------------- L-------------- ------ ----,— --------— ---------J --- ------------ rL FEDERICO ASSOCIATES BOWRIDGE REALTY — — — — — — —� — — —�— —�— — — �— — — — — — — LLC RE 76PROCE IML WORT PIEASANTVOLF,N.Y.IWO BOWMAN W PLAZA a � II II i i II II _. RARRERPWCE ftYE moor,N Y o I I E�ESA7OR ME s"s, BASEMENT --- PLAN I I 14 73 �2 11 OaFIgE I I I _ I ----- --------L-� ------ -------- L ----------L ---------J BASEMENT PLAN �n,E SCALE:IM-1•-T z A3 OF NOTES'. I.ALLAPARTMENTS TERRACE TERRACE TO SE EQUIPPED WITH IZ14 IM"I LOW-FLOW TOILETS AND SHOWERHEADS. ❑ LIV,wG AREA BE�U E: E Ell.LIVING AREA BEDROOM 2 asxux FEDERICO 9 BEDROOM UNIT ASSOCIATES z5 TYPE 63 UNIT Feei 6 2 BEDROOM UNIT I,.�A PE''UNIT OWRIDGE _ ------------ KITCHEN ' REALTY R€TAiL�PAO€ ® LLC A MECH �� O 0 DO IB SMEs aHz KIT nHae 3'' zne 76PRUCE IML WURT - � PIEASANTV"N.Y.Ifd70 O O LAUNDRY I�, LAUND Y EryTRy """ BOWMAN BEDROOM 2 PLAZA � I I szs I eaosv � y 6ARREHP CE "a q .} ftYE eR001'N Y 00 Ea xer 660 DRY L6 ENTRY AUiDKITCHEN .o O A x-xsfie N MECH.x ELEVATOR K , FIRST FLOOR xan � KITCHEN s � I �'> PLAN INIIN p 1 BE DRGOM UNIT 2 BEDROOM UNIT s�Fl N,asa 1 ❑ TYPE'B'UNIT TYPE'B'UNIT �N ElBEDROOM2 BEDROOMU E LIVING AREA s xxo e LIVING AREA ITazs n+z ❑ 6a s xxsv BEDROOM II z soy, s eow z eow 1j 1�z11 TERRACE ,p TERRACE TERRACE ,q 6' 12413' £ coo=s zsa=s �3 TOTAL FLOOR AREA: — FIRST FLOOR PLAN SCALE:IM-I•-T z A4 OF TERRACE ^f� TERRACE TERRACE BEDROOM 1 �xla ❑ LIV,wG AREA +a s x�te BEDROO�M1 BEDROOOM2 tom ❑ ❑ nota LIVING AREA BEDROOM 2 LIVING AREA rL NOTES, 11 s x�n z 1.ALL APARTMENTS TO BE EQUIPPED WITH S LOW-FLOW TOILETS FE DERICO AND sHowERHeAos. ❑ ❑ ASSOCIATES 1 BEDROOM UNIT -zt TYPE'B'UNIT ❑ , r,a ger.-i. ------------------- IFeeiI I 2 BEDROOM UNIT �,.� -------------------- TYPE'A'UNIT I � :: d e � xm�-v,og7GHEN ❑ BOWRIDGE Feei �� �ttff�,�NTIY tt 2 BEDRoo1"1M uN�T RELLCTY��O ❑ TYPE'B'UNITMEGH 0' .IT HE K G N 'i� p'd' AGAN1EIB1LWBftT PIEASANTVW.E,N.Y.Ifd70 In Log] OO _ LAUNDRY LAUND YENTRY, 4' � I KITCHEN BOWMAN BEDROOM 2 PLAZA R -_______—O�- e.ssF �KITCH7FN � BARBEHP CE RYE BROOD0 P'� ENTRY AUNDRY ENTRY ENTRY', ', LAUND KITCHEN ', LAUND 2 O� R OI � n a x e ry zeta zero � �<s x ss � z-xssa�P,' �° I dE�LE,xSaAxn TQR N s o — — — � ------- ------ — -- ------ KITCHEN 00 rl - $ SECOsoreN�D�FLOOR Oa.aO,u R PLAN FE�Et HiD ED'= 1 BEDROOM UMT p INIIN 1 BEDROOM UNIT ❑ 2 BEDROOM UNIT n ❑ N,asa 1 ❑ TYPE'B'UNIT (\p TYPE'B'UNIT ❑ N S ❑ BEDROOM BEDROOM I BEDROOM =71 E �os.�oe asn+zs LIVING ARTA �sn.zs LIVING AREA zxzs BEDROOM 1 z sae x xo.e z zo.e ❑ ` TERRACE ,vp TERRACE ,rp TERRACE 7kLI1IN1i Al2€A d �to.t zao.t �t�t TOTAL FLOOR AREA: - SECOND FLOOR PLAN SCALE:1/4'-I-T z A5 OF NOTES'. I.ALLAPARTMENTS TERRACE ,rp TERRACE TERRACE TO BE EQUIPPEDWITH Is.sr, "1' Is.srl Is.xl LOW-FLOW TOILET€ aws BEDROOM II z-aws AND SHOWERHEADS. LIV,wG AREA +a t xx°-s BEDROO�M� BEDROO�M2 om ❑ ❑ ora ❑ LIVING AREA BEDROOM 2 LI.INC AREA ❑ asx„z S Ell. FEDERICO �IBEDROOMUNIT ❑ ❑ ❑ ASSOCIATES � �a,taF� TYPE'BUNIT ------------------- IFeeiI I 6 2 BEDROOM UNIT � TYPE'A'UN,T :i xlro e'- 1” ❑ -- KKITCHE" �at ❑ BOWRIDGE oo 2 11111"_1 uN�T ❑ REALTY ❑ - Mary TYPE'B'UNIT � : MECH � e e� � ❑ sl DO � IIS aME GHz' KIT nHae 31 _ zne 76PRUCE ImLWOftT %EA6ANTV W.E,N.Y.Ifd70 LAo%DRY I O O LAUNDRY LAUND Y e EryTRy 0 ENTRY 4'❑ ❑ D ❑ o EEKITCHEN BOWMAN BEDROOM 2 PLAZA - e.ssF o --------- 00 BARBER PLACE RYE BftCCK,N Y I Pnnmr _ KITCHEN ❑ ❑ ❑ 00 ENTRY ENTRY ENTRY AUNDRY LAUND KITCHENLAUND O� R I 0 z-xsae ' xz-z' $ �g ? o li `° I o'i a a � w N sMEG°Hz � sMECH � MECHY � � � (D�P,� — — — — ELESVATOR KI 00 �, THIRD FLOOR x anKITCHEN x s Hl� PLAN ' d�x�s� Ka sCeN ° Leal 1 BEDROOM UNIT ooaaF p 1 BEDROOM UNIT 2 BEDROOM UNITn N,asa 1 ElTYPE'B'UNIT (\p TYPE'B'UNIT El S ❑ BED ROOM2BEDROOM, BEDROOMEl E �os.aoa asn+zs LIVING AR%A �snu's ❑ LMN6 6REA ❑ ❑ zxzs BEDROOM II z aws x aws saws El ` TERRACE ,vp TERRACE ,rp TERRACE LIVING Al2€A News News caws TOTAL FLOOR AREA: — THIRD FLOOR PLAN R SCALE:1/4-1'-T z A6 OF BUILDING DEPARTMENT VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK 938 KING STREET RYE BROOK,NY 10573 (914)939-0668 Phone (914)939-5801 Fax rnizzo(@,Eyebrook.org Memorandum To: Anthony F. Federico, RA From: Michael J. Izzo, Building & Fire Inspecto CC: Planning Board E.S.T.F. Date: June 5, 2015 Re: 80 Bowman Avenue, Bowman Plaza, Proposed Mixed-use Building. Emergency Services Task Force/ Site Plan Review The following is based on review of materials submitted by the applicant& include, • Plan Set, BOWMAN PLAZA, pages 1 of 10 through 10 of 10 dated April 30, 2015, and page I 1 of 11 dated May 18, 2015,prepared by Federico Associates and sealed by Anthony F. Federico, R.A. 1. FCNYS 4503.2.7. The applicant shall provide a dimensioned elevation section showing the gradient change(s) for all entrances/exits including the proposed mountable curb at the northeast corner of the site. 2. The applicant shall provide a dimensioned elevation drawing showing height clearances from the lowest hanging power lines to the proposed grade at Bowman Avenue and Barber Place, including at all exit/entrance points. 3. The applicant shall provide a dimensioned elevation drawing showing all existing & proposed utility poles adjacent to the lot on Bowman Avenue& Barber Place including all existing& proposed guide wires and applicable clearances. 4. Although the applicant has shown compliance with the FCNYS for fire department apparatus aerial access, the fire department has concerns about accessing the upper floors or the roof at the west elevation. NFPA §5.1.8.2 requires a 75-112 degree angle of inclination for ground ladder stability. The proposed side yard setback at the west elevation will limit the use of ground ladders in this area. V FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. PLANNING, TRANSPORTATION, ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT RYE, NEW YORK FAIRFIELD,CONNECTICUT DAVID H. STOLMAN MEMORANDUM AICP,PP PRESIDENT MICHAEL A. GALANTE To: Rye Brook Planning Board EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT 350 THEO.FREMDAVE. Date: May 27, 2015 RYE, NEW YORK 10580 914 967-6540 Subject: Traffic Review — Bowman Plaza, Bowman Avenue, Rye FAX: 914 967-6615 Brook, New York CONNECTICUT 203 255-3100 845297-6056EY As requested, and in reference to previous discussions with the Applicant's LONG ISLAND Traffic Consultant, we reviewed the April 28th, 2015 Draft Memorandum 5i6 364-4544 summarizing traffic-related issues for the proposed residential/commercial www.fpclark.com building. email@fpclarl(.com The Applicant estimates that a mixed-use development, as proposed with 16 residential units and approximately 2,400 square feet of retail space, would generate approximately 25 vehicle trip ends during a typical weekday afternoon peak hour condition. The Saturday midday peak hour estimate for site traffic would be slightly higher. The Applicant notes that these numbers should be considered very conservative since a majority of the commercial traffic may actually be pass-by trips, which refers to a motorist already traveling on adjacent roadways and now becoming a patron of one of the retail establishments within the subject property. We agree with the assessment provided by the Applicant, which indicates this development could generate 25 vehicle trip ends during the weekday _ afternoon peak hour condition. It is very likely that the number of actual new trips will be less. This level of additional traffic added to Bowman Avenue and the adjacent local streets will have an insignificant, if any, impact on area roadways. There have been several discussions related to access consideration, the access specifically to the front parking area fronting Bowman Avenue and the concerns related to emergency access. It is our understanding the latest conceptual plan would provide for an entrance/exit only to Bowman Avenue and emergency access to this same parking area on Barber Place. We agree with this layout and await any comments from the Village regarding emergency access considerations. FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. PLANNING,TRANSPORTATION, ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT RYE, NEW YORK FAIRFIELD,CONNECTICUT The two proposed access drives serving the development should be controlled with STOP signs and STOP bars and provide for appropriate intersection sight distance (ISD) at each of the driveways. Michael A. Galante Executive Vice President g:\rye brook misc\538.658 bowman ave.mixed-use dev.,rye brook.docx:ev:td 2 FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. PLANNING, TRANSPORTATION, ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT RYE, NEW YORK FAIRFIELD, CONNECTICUT DAVID H.STOLMAN MEMORANDUM AICP,PP PRESIDENT To: Gary Zuckerman, Chairman, and the MICHAEL A. GALANTE EXECUTIVE Planning g y Board of the Village of Rye Brook VICE PRESIDENT 35o THEO.FREMD AVE. Date: May 27, 2015 RYE, NEW YORK 1058o 914 967-6540 FAX:914 967-6615 Subject: Bowridge Plaza, 80 Bowman Avenue— CONNECTICUT Subdivision, Rezoning and Site Plan Applications 203 255-3100 HUDSON VALLEY We reviewed an additionally revised site plan and additional information 845 297-6056 submitted by Frank Madonna, Bowridge Realty, LLC, property owner, for LONG ISLAND approval of a subdivision (lot merger), a zoning map amendment to add the 5i6 364-4544 property into the Cl District, and a site plan. The new revisions to the site www.fpdark.com plan include a mountable curb emergency entrance into the site from Barber email@fpclark.com Place, which will allow fire engine aerial access to the building. The revised site plan eliminates the vehicular exit from the parking area adjacent to Bowman Avenue onto Barber Place and one parking space to allow for cars in the parking area to turn around and exit onto Bowman Avenue using the same curb cut as the entrance to the site from Bowman Avenue. The revised plan answers our concerns regarding the location of the exit onto Barber Place and its proximity to the intersection, and will require approval from the Rye Brook Emergency Services Task Force. Property Description and History The 21,982.06 square-foot property, comprised of three existing building lots, is located in the FAH District. The FAH District zoning and an AFFH development site plan approval are currently in effect. However, an approved subdivision plat combining the lots that comprise the property was not filed with the Westchester County Clerk's Office, so the approved subdivision/lot merger has expired. Revised Project Description The revised application proposes construction of a three-story mixed-use building consisting of 2,400 square feet of ground-floor retail space and a total of 16 apartments, with 38 parking spaces located under the building and FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. PLANNING, TRANSPORTATION, ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT RYE, NEW YORK FAIRFIELD, CONNECTICUT in two street-level parking areas on property located at the southeast corner of the intersection of Bowman Avenue and Barber Place, Section 141.27, Block 1, Lots 26, 31, and 32 on the Town of Rye Tax Assessor's Map. The residential component of the development would include eight one-bedroom and eight two-bedroom apartments. Each apartment includes a 64 square-foot balcony or terrace. The revised submission also includes a subdivision application to combine the lots that comprise the property required by Section 250-6 A. (2) (a) of the Rye Brook Code, and a petition to the Board of Trustees to amend the Zoning Map of the Village to remove the property from the FAH District and include the property within the Cl District. The revised Proposed Action no longer includes a request for zoning text amendments of the C I District. Instead, the Applicant requests certain variances from the C 1 District regulations from the Rye Brook Zoning Board of Appeals. Review We reviewed an additionally revised site plan, correspondence, analyses and supporting materials submitted by the Applicant that include the following items: 1. Site Plan Application 2. Site Plan Submittal Review Checklist 3. Application for Subdivision Approval 4. Architectural Review Board Checklist for Applicants 5. Exterior Building Permit Application 6. Full Environmental Assessment Form 7. Draft Construction Management Plan prepared by Bowridge Realty, LLC, Pleasantville, N.Y., dated March 20, 2015 8. Petition Letter to Rezone Tax Lots dated October 29, 2014, to the Board of Trustees from Federico Associates 9. Parking Analysis Memorandum prepared by Parish and Weiner, Inc., White Plains, N.Y., dated March 24, 2015 10.Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment Report, prepared by Team Environmental Consultants, Inc., Middletown, N.Y., dated May 2, 2012 11.Letter to the Planning Board from Frederico Associates, White Plains, N.Y., dated March 20, 2015 12.Letter to the Planning Board from Bowridge Realty, LLC, Pleasantville, N.Y. dated February 6, 2015 13.Letter to the Planning Board from Frank C. Madonna, Bowridge Realty, LLC, Pleasantville, N.Y. dated November 26, 2014 2 FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. PLANNING, TRANSPORTATION, ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT RYE, NEW YORK FAIRFIELD,CONNECTICUT 14.Letter to Michael Izzo, Rye Brook Building and Fire Inspector from Frank C. Madonna, Bowridge Realty, LLC, Pleasantville, N.Y. dated September 18, 2014 15."Topography of Property," prepared by Thomas C. Merritts Land Surveyors, P.C., Pleasantville, N.Y. dated August 20, 2012, last revised November 26, 2014 16. "Preliminary Merger and Reapportionment Map," prepared by Thomas C. Merritts Land Surveyors, P.C., Pleasantville, N.Y. dated July 12, 2012, revised September 20, 2012 17.Letter to Frank and Virginia Madonna from Keane and Beane, P.C., Village Counsel dated October 6, 2014 18.Memorandum to the Planning Board from Michael J. Izzo, Rye Brook Building and Fire Inspector dated April 17, 2015 19.Memorandum to the Planning Board from Michael J. Izzo, Rye Brook Building and Fire Inspector dated April 6, 2015 20.Memorandum to the Planning Board from Michael J. Izzo, Rye Brook Building and Fire Inspector dated December 5, 2014 21.Architect's Plans, prepared by Federico Associates, White Plains, N.Y.: Sheet Number Sheet Title Dated 1 of 11 Cover Sheet 9/18/2014 rev. 3/20/2015 2 of 11 Existing Conditions 9/18/2014 rev. 3/20/2015 3 of 11 Preliminary Site Plan and Zoning Table 9/18/2014 rev. 3/20/2015 4 of 11 Preliminary Site Layout Plan and Zoning Table 9/18/2014 rev. 5/19/2015 5 of 11 Preliminary Utility Plan 9/18/20 rev. 3/20/2015 6 of 11 Preliminary Grading/Sediment & Erosion Control & Tree Protection Plan 9/18/2014 rev. 3/20/2015 7 of 11 Preliminary Landscape Plan 9/18/2014 rev. 3/20/2015 8 of 11 Details 9/18/2014 rev. 3/20/2015 9 of 11 Details 9/18/2014 rev. 3/20/2015 10 of 11 Details 9/18/2014 rev. 3/20/2015 11 of 11 Aerial Fire Apparatus Access Plan 9/18/2014 rev. 5/19/2015 Al of 6 Bowman Avenue Elevation 9/18/2014 rev. 3/20/2015 A2 of 6 Barber Place Elevation 9/18/2014 rev. 3/20/2015 A3 of 6 Basement Plan 9/18/2014 rev. 3/20/2015 A4 of 6 First Floor Plan 9/18/2014 rev. 3/20/2015 3 FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. PLANNING, TRANSPORTATION, ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT RYE, NEW YORK FAIRFIELD,CONNECTICUT A5 of 6 Second Floor Plan 9/18/2014 rev. 3/20/2015 A6 of 6 Third Floor Plan 9/18/2014 rev. 3/20/2015 Please note that our review is limited to planning, zoning and environmental issues. In order to move the application forward in the review process, the following items needed to complete the applications, which were requested in earlier memoranda from our office, and Village staff and consultants should be submitted as soon as possible before the next Planning Board meeting on June 11, 2015: 1. a complete set of revised plans that includes all the latest site layout changes and responds to all comments from the Planning Board, Village staff, the Village's consultants, the Fire and Building Inspector, and the Rye Brook Emergency Services Task Force; 2. the data verification sheet for the Full EAF filled out online at the NYSDEC Mapper website; and 3. a stormwater management plan. We look forward to discussion with the Planning Board. Marilyn Timpone-Mohamed, ASLA, AICP Senior Associate/Planning/Environment cc: Honorable Mayor and the Village Board of Trustees Christopher Bradbury, Village Administrator Michal Nowak, Village Engineer/Superintendent of Public Works Philip A. Butler, Esq., Village Attorney Anthony F. Federico, for the Applicant .1.-IDOCS215001Rye Brook153R.h5R.R0 Bowman A venue.Rezoning and Site Plan.PB memo5.mtm.docm 4 LOCAL LAW AMENDING CHAPTER 250 OF THE VILLAGE CODE A LOCAL LAW to amend Chapter 250 of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook regarding Professional Offices. BE IT ENACTED, by the Board of Trustees of the Village of Rye Brook, as follows: Section 1. Chapter 250, Section 25, Subsection D, Item 1 of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook is hereby amended as follows: D. Uses permitted at discretion of the Planning Board pursuant to the procedure specified in Article IV, X250-6H(1): (1) Professional office space for use by physicians, surgeons, dentists, attorneys, accountants, insurance agents or similar professions, not residents of the premises, in dwellings on the northerly and southerly side of Bowman Avenue between South Ridge Street and the Port Chester Village boundary line, and in dwellings on the northerly and southerly side of Westchester Avenue between North Ridge Street and the Port Chester Village boundary line, and in dwellings on the easterly side of South Ridge Street between Westchester Avenue and Bowman Avenue,-presently zoned R2- F, provided that there shall not be more than two such professional persons occupying any one dwelling, and provided further that there shall be no hospital facilities in connection therewith in any case. (a) Off-street parking space shall be provided for at least three cars for each office or suite of offices of a given tenancy or one car for every 300 square feet of floor area used for such office purposes, whichever is greater, and the public entrance to such professional office and parking for such office shall be from Bowman Avenue, Westchester Avenue or South Ridge Street only. (b) Signs, for the professional occupying the space, shall not exceed two square feet in area, identifying a professional office. (c) New structures and additions, renovations or modifications to existing structures in which a professional office is located shall be designed to retain the residential appearance of the building to preserve the existing residential character of the neighborhood. Section 2. Chapter 250, Section 20.1, Subsection D of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook is hereby amended as follows: D. Uses permitted at discretion of the Planning Board pursuant to the procedure specified in Article IV, §250-6H(1): the +e R-25 Distr et (1) The same as in the R-25 District. (2) Professional office space for use b�physicians, surgeons, dentists, attorneys, accountants, insurance agents or similar professions, not residents of the premises dwellings on the northerly side of Westchester Avenue between North Ridge Street And the Port Chester Village boundar, lam, presently zoned R-15A, provided that there shall not be more than two such professional persons occupying any one dwelling, and provided further that there shall be no hospital facilities in connection therewith in any case. ( Off-street barking space shall be provided for at least three cars for each office or suite of offices of a given�y or one car for every 300 square feet of floor area used for such office purVoses, whichever is greater, and the public entrance to such professional office and parking for such office shall be from Westchester Avenue only. (b) Signs, for the professional occupying the space, shall not exceed two square feet in area,identifying a professional office. (c) New structures and additions, renovations or modifications to existing structures in which a professional office is located shall be designed to retain the residential appearance of the building to preserve the existing residential character of the neighborhood. Section 3. Severability. If any clause, sentence, paragraph, section, article or part of this Local Law shall be adjudicated in any court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such judgment shall not affect, impair, or invalidate the remainder thereof, but shall be confined in its operation to the clause, sentence, paragraph, section, article or part thereof directly= involved in the controversy in which such judgment shall have been rendered, and such invalidity shall not be deemed to affect the remaining portions thereof. Section 4. This local law shall take effect immediately upon filing with the Office of the Secretary of State. Plan Rye Brook 14. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS The following is a summary of all recommendations made in this Plan. The following chapter, Implementation and Action Agenda, discusses and prioritizes those recommendations that are action items. Land Use and Zoning ■ Create either a new Open Space/Recreation zone for the Blind Brook Country Club property, or zone R-30 and mandate cluster development. Include the Village- and Town- designated parks in the Open Space/Recreation zone, to preserve these significant open space assets. ■ Review the C1 and C1-P zones to address excessive front yard setbacks and provide sufficient buffering from adjacent residential uses, and look at increasing height and floor area ratio (FAR) maximums to accommodate 3-4 story mixed-use development (residential over commercial). ■ Explore allowing multifamily uses in the C1 and C1-P zones by special permit, subject to the following criteria: o Co-location with commercial/office uses o Residential uses limited to upper floors in buildings fronting Westchester Avenue, Bowman Avenue or South Ridge Street o New residential uses limited to studios and one-bedrooms ■ Throughout the R2-F two-family residential zone, look at allowing offices as principal uses rather than accessory home offices, subject to a special permit, to encourage viable uses while preserving the residential character of existing buildings. ■ Explore creating a Village Center overlay zone — encompassing the existing C1, C1-P and OB-S zones, the OB-2-zoned parcel on Bowman Avenue east of Port Chester Middle School, as well as R2-F-zoned parcels along South Ridge Street, Westchester Avenue and Bowman Avenue — to promote mixed use, "downtown" development. Such a zone could provide for more flexible use, area and bulk standards or zoning incentives, but require new development to conform to a set of advisory design guidelines. ■ Pursue right of first offer for the gas station property at Ridge Street/Bowman Avenue for potential use as mixed-use development and/or public space. Natural Resources and Stormwater Management ■ Continue to focus on stormwater management at the regional and intermunicipal level, through partnerships with other municipalities, institutions and advocacy groups, and pursue funding for such partnerships and projects as needed. ■ Create incentives for homeowners to better manage stormwater on a local level. ■ Undertake a comprehensive sustainability plan to articulate a vision and approach to sustainability that is tailored to Rye Brook, with an action plan of implementable practices or projects that would be effective in addressing specific goals, objectives and targets in a Chapter 14: Summary of Recommendations 191 Local Laws, Regulations and Policies Village r Inter- Governmental 4. Land Use and Zoning Create either a new Open Space/Recreation zone for the Blind Brook Country Club property, or zone 4.1 R-30 and mandate cluster development. Include the Village- and Town-designated parks in an Open Village Board Space/Recreation zone,to preserve these significant open space assets. Review the C1 and C1-P zones to address excessive front yard setbacks and provide sufficient buffering 4.2 from adjacent residential uses, and look at increasing height and floor area ratio (FAR) maximums to Village Board, accommodate 3-4 story mixed-use development(residential over commercial). Planning Board Explore allowing multifamily uses in the C1 and C1-P zones by special permit, subject to the following criteria: 4.3 ' Co-location with commercial/office uses Village Board, ■ Residential uses limited to upper floors in buildings fronting Westchester Avenue, Bowman Planning Board Avenue or South Ridge Street ■ New residential uses limited to studios and one-bedrooms Throughout the R2-F two-family residential zone, look at allowing offices as principal uses rather than 4.4 accessory home offices, subject to a special permit, to encourage viable uses while preserving the Village Board, residential character of existing buildings. Planning Board Explore creating a Village Center overlay zone—encompassing the existing C1, C1-P and OB-S zones, the OB-2-zoned parcel on Bowman Avenue east of Port Chester Middle School, as well as R2-F-zoned 4.5 parcels along South Ridge Street, Westchester Avenue and Bowman Avenue —to promote mixed use, Village Board, "downtown"development. Such a zone could provide for more flexible use, area and bulk standards or Planning Board zoning incentives, but require new development to conform to a set of advisory design guidelines. Chapter 15: Implementation and Action Agenda 204 On a motion made by Trustee Epstein and seconded by Trustee Rednick,the following resolution was adopted. RESOLUTION REFERRING A LOCAL LAW CONCERNING THE PERMISSIBLE LOCATIONS FOR PROFESSIONAL OFFICE USES TO THE VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK PLANNING BOARD VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK BOARD OF TRUSTEES WHEREAS, the Village of Rye Brook Board of Trustees is considering a local law to allow professional office uses in certain portions of the R-217 and R-15A Zoning Districts in the Village of Rye Brook;and WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees, pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act(SEQRA)determines the proposed action to be an Unlisted Action pursuant to SEQRA. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that pursuant to Section 250-14 of the Village Code, the Board of Trustees hereby refers the above-referenced local lav to the Rye Brook Planning Board for a Report and Recommendation thereon. TRUSTEE EPSTEIN AYE TRUSTEE HEISER AYE TRUSTEE KLEIN AYE TRUSTEE REDNICK AYE MAYOR ROSENBERG AYE State of New York County of Westchester ss: Village of Rye Brook I hereby certify that this is the Resolution adopted by the Board of Trustees of the Village of Rye Brook which was duly passed by said Board on May 12,2015 IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the Seal of the Village of Rye Brook,this 13th day of May,2015 Village Clerk