Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2015-05-14 - Planning Board Meeting Documents Approved:May 14, 2015 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK PLANNING BOARD VILLAGE HALL, 938 KING STREET Thursday, March 12, 2015 - 7:30 p.m. AGENDA ROLL CALL MINUTES AFFORDABLE HOUSING: 1. Review of a Site Plan Application by Buckingham Partners / Sun Homes for a Planned Unit Development with a Fair and Affordable Housing component located at 1100 King Street Rye Brook, NY Parcel ID 129.25-1-1 PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED BUSINESS NEW BUSINESS: 2. Review of a Site Plan Application by Verizon Wireless for a Wireless Telecommunications Permit Application, to construct an Attached Wireless Telecommunications Facility for the property located at 975 Anderson Hill Road, Rye Brook NY, Parcel I.D. 129.34-1-45 Considering a Report and Recommendation to the Board of Trustees LOCAL LAW CONSIDERATION ACTION ON NON-AGENDA MATTERS THE NEXT PLANNING BOARD MEETING: April 9, 2015 BOARD Mr. Domenic Accurso Mr. John Grzan Planning Board Meeting March 12, 2015 Page 1 Mr. Bill Laufer Mrs. Amy Schoen Mr. Dan Tartaglia Chairman Gary Zuckerman STAFF Philip Butler, Esq., Village Counsel Mike Nowak, Jr., Public Works Superintendent Fred Siefert, Public Access Coordinator/IT Marilyn Timpone-Mohamed, Village Planning Consultant BOARD OF TRUSTEES LIAISON: Trustee David Heiser Chairman Gary Zuckerman opened the meeting by asking everyone to join him in the Pledge of Allegiance. He welcomed everyone to the March 12, 2015 Planning Board meeting, He asked that all cell phones be turned off, and that anyone addressing the Board do so from the podium, using the microphone. Chairman Zuckerman introduced the Board members and the Village Staff and explained the rules of procedure for the meeting. He made note for the public that the complete set of Planning Board Rules of Procedure can be found on the Village's website and that the meeting could be viewed on streaming video and on the Village's public access channel. Chairman Zuckerman called for the first item on the agenda. AFFORDABLE HOUSING: 1. Review of a Site Plan Application by Buckingham Partners / Sun Homes for a Planned Unit Development with a Fair and Affordable Housing component located at 1100 King Street, Rye Brook, NY Parcel ID 129.25-1-1 William Null, Esq., of the firm of Cuddy & Fedder, on behalf of Sun Homes, addressed the Board. Bill McGuinness, the applicant, and Jerry Schwalbe of Divney Tung Schwalbe were also in attendance and available to respond to questions. Mr. Null stated that the application consists of a request for text amendments to the Zoning Code and review of a concept plan. The development is proposed for the property owned by Reckson Office Park, known as Phase III. It will include 100 market rate and 10 affordable homes on a 30+ acre site. This site was previously approved for a 280,000 square foot office building with 1,000 plus parking spaces. That approval is Planning Board Meeting March 12, 2015 Page 2 currently valid, although it does expire at the end of this year. The application is before the Planning Board for a recommendation and report to the Board of Trustees. This project would require a change from the OB-1 Zone to a P.U.D., and changes to the Zoning Ordinance, which include the waiver of the 100' foot setback; changes to the maximum allowable density, the 9,000 square foot floor area limitation, and the 150 foot minimum frontage on King Street. The 110 dwelling proposal, which includes 10 affordable housing units, would fall under the purview of the Board of Trustees. One of the issues to be addressed is that the P.U.D. District provides for a specific density. The Ordinance notes that garages under the house count in the floor area calculations, however, freestanding garages, do not count. The gross floor area of proposed walk out basements are counted towards the total allowable gross floor area by the Village Code if sufficient bulk of the walk-out basement is above the original grade level of the site. Walkout basements will be created by extensive grading of the site. The applicant requests that the requirement for a maximum of 9,000 square feet of floor area per acre be waived. Amending the Code would allow the applicant to avoid going before the Zoning Board of Appeals. Jerry Schwalbe noted that currently the Applicant can construct a 284,400 square foot office building. The market-rate homes are designed to have attached garages. The unit count is 6 units per acre. Mr. John Grzan questioned whether or not the entire site was being used for calculations. Attorney Null responded that you need 30 acres for a PUD. Chairman Zuckerman pointed out that the portion of the property being addressed is the 31.5 acres, Phase III lot. The land area also includes buffers and open space. Mr. Schwalbe noted that adding 90,000 square feet for garages and walkout basements puts the project over the allowable maximum density. It was noted that the Affordable Housing units will have detached garages that would not count toward the maximum allowable floor area. Mr. Null stated that the Affordable Housing units are in compliance with the County affordable housing requirements. Norma Drummond, the housing staff member at Westchester County Planning has been contacted, and the applicant discussed configuration and the size of the units with her. The affordable townhouses are two stories. The garages are detached. There is room for storage in the garages. The applicant also requests a waiver of the 100 foot buffer requirement. The Village Board has the ability to reduce the buffer from required 100 feet to 80 feet. The perimeter will Planning Board Meeting March 12, 2015 Page 3 be landscaped to create a separation between the office buildings in the Reckson Office Park and the proposed residential development. There is a requirement for 150 feet of frontage on a state or county road in the PUD regulations; however, when this property was subdivided it was specifically stated that the property would not need frontage on a public road with an access easement for the Phase II lot. Bill McGuinness of Sun Homes addressed the Board. The site plan submitted is for town homes. They are very house-like in size. The goal is to try to give everyone private garden space, garage and driveway. There are 10 affordable homes included in the proposal. You enter the development through Reckson Office Park. A larger boulevard will be created, and there will be roads coming off the central boulevard. The development will have open space and yards for the families, a walking/jogging path, a clubhouse and a pool. The clubhouse will have a party room, bar, pool, hot tub, and state-of-the-art fitness center. He presented photos of what the homes will look like. Amy Schoen asked if each home would have a garden space and a patio. It was noted that each home is 37' to 40' wide and the gardens would be as wide as the homes. They will be landscaped. The intention of the landscaping is to define the rear yards. The condo association will maintain the gardens. In between patios there will be soft fencing. The property line will be screened with landscaping. The garden spaces are all about providing privacy. There is hard siding with PVC based trim on the outsides of the structures. This is a low maintenance exterior. The homes will have a traditional old house character. Mr. McGuinness noted that he designs the buildings himself. His partner is an attorney, and they are both directly involved with their projects. They are also the general contractors. Mr. McGuinness presented a diagram of the proposed affordable homes. He noted that these townhouses are 20' wide. There will be no one living above or below the owners and they will each have a private yard in the back. The detached garage for each unit is across the street. The homes will be up to 1,400 square feet, and there will be two and three bedroom units. The affordable units will not have access to the Club House and amenities. Mr. Null explained that these are for sale units. The cost of operating the amenities is significant. The pricing for the affordable units is based on an individual's income. These units have very comfortable living space. The amenity package is quite expensive, so the applicant is considering a separate Home Owners Association for the affordable homes. Dan Tartaglia was surprised to learn that these homes will not have access to the amenities. Ms. Schoen stated that the purpose of affordable housing is to ensure that these individuals live like the other people in that community. She did not favor the idea Planning Board Meeting March 12, 2015 Page 4 that the affordable-unit residents would not be given the same access to amenities as everyone else. Mr. Null stated that there is different treatment, but the townhouses are designed to maximize what can be provided under affordable housing. There is no subsidy from Westchester County for this project. Mr. Null noted that the club house will have a dining area, bar area, swimming pool, and a kitchen for events. It will be costly to maintain and the costs are included in the maintenance fees for the 100 market-rate units, along with the maintenance of the roadways and landscaping. The applicant wants to make the development have the appearance that it is one community. The legal structure needs to be worked out. John Grzan felt that it was unfair to exclude the affordable housing from use of the club house and amenities. If a group of children are playing outside and go to the pool, the children of the affordable housing units won't be able to join them. People grow up knowing that there are things you get and things you don't get, but this seems unfair. Dan Tartaglia understood that including the affordable housing units means that the other homeowners would be carrying the affordable housing. He suggested that perhaps an a la carte type menu would work where the amenities are concerned, i.e., if you can pay for the pool, then you can enjoy the use. It was noted that this is the first time that the project is before the Planning Board. Inclusion of affordable housing in a project is not unique, but there are some issues that need to be worked out. The developer is building the affordable housing units without County funds. All the children playing on the same streets will be going to the same schools, and no one wants to feel different. It should be remembered that the developer is giving people who may not otherwise be able to live in this community an opportunity. Mr. McGuinness stated that the al la carte menu is definitely something that deserves consideration. Robert Goodman noted that the Planning Board's review will ascertain whether this is the best plan. There are some policy issues that need to be worked out. Dan Tartaglia noted that there are two impact issues. He stated that he would like to know what amount of land remains the Reckson office portion of the property that is developable. Mr. Null stated that he would research the issue. He stressed, however, that the information does not have a bearing on the Phase III site. Planning Board Meeting March 12, 2015 Page 5 The Planning Board will consider future traffic impacts on King Street, as well as storm water management. Mr. Schwalbe noted that the approved storm water management plan for the Phase III lot was designed for the 280,000 square foot office building and the proposed residential project will have less impervious coverage. He also noted that the applicant's plans include installing rain gardens. Dominick Accurso addressed the issue of the required 100' buffer. He felt that it was important to have a buffer between the development and Bellefair to the north. Ms. Marilyn Timpone-Mohamed, Village Planning Consultant, pointed out that a buffer that is 30' wide is only one tree width between the houses and the parking area. Other issues that require additional review are the site plan layout for the affordable housing. The current layout of the affordable housing does not conform to the Village Code requirement that affordable homes should be blended into a development of market-rate homes. Once the P.U.D. zoning goes into effect, it becomes the zoning for the site, and the requirements for affordable housing in the Village Code will apply. The site plan should be inclusive, and she felt that the current site and building plans could be improved. According to the Village Code, affordable units must be at least 80% of the floor area of the market rate units. The Sun Homes units are less than 50% of the market- rate unit's floor areas. The configuration of the affordable housing, and the fact that the garages are across the street from the units make the affordable units very distinguishable from the market-rate units. Amy Schoen stated the point that affordable housing should blend into the development. She also believed that the exclusion of residents of the affordable units from use of the amenities must be reviewed. Chairman Zuckerman noted that the Planning Board will not rush through the review of the application. It may take several meetings to review. The Village Code may need to be tweaked in connection with affordable housing, but there is more to this application than just the affordable housing. With the consensus of the Board, the matter was adjourned to the April meeting. He stated his opinion that the application is a good opportunity to provide affordable housing in Rye Brook. Mr. Null noted that the applicant submitted a traffic study and an analysis of the estimated number of school age children that would be generated by the development. John Collins noted that the traffic generated from the proposed P.U.D. would be only 25% of the traffic generated from the 280,000 square foot office building, which is a smaller traffic impact. Planning Board Meeting March 12, 2015 Page 6 Chairman Zuckerman called for the Verizon application. NEW BUSINESS 2. Review of a Site Plan Application by Verizon Wireless for a Wireless Telecommunications Permit Application to construct an Attached Wireless Telecommunications Facility on the property located at 975 Anderson Hill Road, Rye Brook NY, Parcel I.D. 129.34-1-45 • Considering a Report and Recommendation to the Board of Trustees Michael Sheridan of Snyder & Snyder, attorney for Verizon Wireless, addressed the Board. He noted that the proposal is a stealth flag pole installation, with no flag. The proposal would construct the facility on the roof of the Doral Arrowwood Hotel. Also on the roof of the building will be related equipment, surrounded on three sides by a screen wall. The equipment will be away from the front of the building. The only piece of equipment that will not be located on the roof will be a back-up generator to be located in an existing equipment area adjacent of the building. HDR and F.P. Clark Associates have reviewed the application and their comments were received by the applicant. Ms. Timpone-Mohamed, Village Planning Consultant, noted that she was unable to read the copy of the visual analysis that she was provided. It was very washed out so she could not see where the flag pole would be located. Another issue is that all of the pictures were taken in the summer time when there are leaves on trees. Photos should be taken now when there are no leaves. The stealth pole is approximately 77' high and it is located within the Z-1 zone of the airport. There should be some notification to the FAA. Cross-sections of the elevational change from the airport runway to the stealth pole were not provided. Verizon's representatives felt there was no need to notify the FAA because the pole meets the height requirements of the Z-1 Zone. Chairman Zuckerman felt that the airport should be contacted and their comments should be provided to the Village. Planes fly very low over Doral Greens. Michael Musso, HDR, Village Technical Consultant, addressed the Board. He noted that the first copy of the photos and visual impacts were not clear. The best time to do photos for cell pole sites is now, when there are no leaves. This site may be a little unique as it is a 35-foot pole attached to an existing roof. He noted that Verizon site acquisition Planning Board Meeting March 12, 2015 Page 7 personnel identify sites years before a facility is actually constructed. As FAA regulations and criteria are updated, so should be the information provided by Verizon. It is always important to reach out to the airport even though the height of the pole seems to be in accordance with the current regulations. There may not be any issues in terms of the height or lighting, but it is important to receive this approval from the airport. Mr. Musso noted that he visited the site and the area. He inspected the site where the generator will sit. The current generator sits in a knoll. The stealth pole is a monopole- type facility. The pole sits on top of a roof rising 35' above the roof. No flag is proposed for this flag pole. The color of the pole will be white. This design is smooth and relatively slender. The antennas are nested within the pole. It will be the tallest feature on the roof. A platform will be built on the roof for the eight (8) equipment cabinets, each about the size of a dishwasher. The cabinets will be screened so that they will not be visible from surrounding areas. Screen walls work well, and the applicant is proposing a cream color vinyl siding on the walls. A conduit and cabling will be running between the generator and proposed facility. There will be a gas line to the generator from the hotel building. Most of the cabling will run along the roof surface, but there will be some vertical cables running up the building. The roof top installation does not add coverage in a dead zone. The new Verizon installation will provide enhanced services to existing coverage, The existing cell sites are being overwhelmed. This is primarily a capacity relief site, and this is the first time the Village is seeing this type of application. Ms. Schoen requested information on potential co-locators on the new Verizon facility. Mr. Musso felt that there would not be co-located providers in future because Verizon will have six (6) antennas, which will fill the pole, and the pole will be too short to accommodate other antennas. Verizon had stated that it would entertain collocation. Chairman Zuckerman noted that the Village was in favor of co-location. However, in this case, if co-location was proposed, the flag pole would need to be higher. Ms. Schoen questioned whether there were hazards that might emanate from the pole, such as a hazard to aviation. Mr. Musso noted that the operating frequencies are listed in the application. He reviewed the megahertz. His perspective was that Verizon and other carriers are regulated. There are wireless facilities at Westchester County Airport. The airports and FCC work together. Mr. Musso noted that the radio emissions have been requested for review. A report was prepared by Clinical Telephone. They have reviewed the frequency emissions and found that they are in compliance with FCC regulations. Mr. Musso noted that the report is from a credible source. The Village can only inquire into whether the emissions from the facility will comply with the FCC regulations. Planning Board Meeting March 12, 2015 Page 8 Mr. Musso noted that the proposed generator is smaller in length, weight and height than the existing generator in the existing at-grade equipment area. The new generator will utilize the existing pad. A noise analysis was done and it turned out to be very good. The generator uses natural gas. The FAA and airspace issues must be addressed. The Village's Building Inspector will need to review the application. This application also will go before the Architectural Review Board. This project makes sense, but a comparison of neighboring sites will be reviewed. Forward Data Volume and average scheduled eligibility users are two interesting trends to be reviewed. It was reiterated that this is a capacity relief facility that will address transmission issues. Mr. Musso noted that the height of the top of the pole conforms to the applicable height restrictions of the Z-1 zone, but reiterated that confirmation should be obtained from the Westchester Airport that the pole will not be an issue. Mr. Musso reviewed the remaining comments and recommendations set forth in his technical memorandum dated March 12, 2015. The comments and recommendations shall be incorporated into the Planning Board report and recommendation and will need to be addressed by Verizon. Chairman Zuckerman made a note for the record that the Board has received a memo of concerns from Doral Greens. Mr. Nicholas Lyras, President of the Doral Greens Homeowners Association, expressed concerns and these concerns/comments will be incorporated into the report to the Board of Trustees. A Report and Recommendations will be issued to the Board of Trustees upon completion of the review. New photographs will be submitted, along with responses to the comments made by the Planning Board and its consultants. Chairman Zuckerman asked that the information be submitted as soon as possible as the agenda for the April meeting is a full one and the Board would like time to review the information. The applicant was also instructed to contact the Building Inspector to discuss the application. Chairman Zuckerman noted that the next Planning Board meeting was scheduled for April 9, 2015. There being no further business before the Board, Chairman Zuckerman called for a motion to adjourn. On a motion and a second, and with the consensus of the Board, the meeting was adjourned at 9:35 p.m. Planning Board Meeting March 12, 2015 Page 9 BUILDING DEPARTMENT VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK 938 KING STREET RYE BROOK,NY 10573 (914)939-0668 Phone (914)939-5801 Fax mizzo(@Eyebrook.org Memorandum To: William S.Null, Esq., Cuddy & Feder, LLP From: Michael J. Izzo, Building& Fire Inspector CC: Emergency Services Task Force (ESTF) Date: May 7, 2015 Re: ESTF review of the Sun Homes Residential Development at the Reckson Office Campus. The following six comments are based on review of materials submitted by Cuddy& Feder, LLP on behalf of the applicant, Buckingham Partners and Sun Homes, for the proposed residential development at the Reckson Office Campus located at 1100 King Street. Reviewed materials include; • SUN HOMES, CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN, pages, SP-1.0 and SP-2.0,dated,02109115, prepared by Divney Tung& Schwalbe, LLP, sealed by Gerhard Martin Schwalbe, PE. 1. The emergency access road shown on the north side of the site must be extended to exit at King Street.The access road shall not exit at the current King Street exit. It was suggested that the applicant consider the area where the pillars are currently located. Please note that the exit must conform with the 2010 FCNYS for emergency access. 2. 2010 FCNYS Appendix D, D103.1, requires that the roadway width be increased to 26' wide for at least 20' in length at all fire hydrants.The draft site plan currently shows the entire roadway width at 24' wide. 3. The ESTF must be given the opportunity to review&approve the road naming and building numbering scheme. 4. 2010 FCNYS Appendix D, D103.4 requires that dead-end fire apparatus access roads exceeding 150' in length must have a width of at least 96'. The 156' Iong dead-end cul- de-sac shown at the south elevation does not meet this minimum standard. 5. The proposed site plan must include information showing fire department apparatus approach &egress. The applicant should superimpose the specification drawing, dimensions&turning radius for the largest piece of firefighting apparatus in the Port Chester/Rye Brook Fire Department motor pool on the plans. In addition,the applicant should show that the site can adequately accommodate school buses. (An electronic version of the apparatus specification drawing will be included with this memo.) 6. The existing traffic light at King Street and International Drive is owned by the State of NY and should be reviewed,evaluated and possibly modified for proper operation with the proposed residential development.The ESTF is concerned that during the spring and summer months,the existing foliage obstructs the traffic signal and limits the line-of-site; this condition must be addressed. Please note that some of the trees in question are Iocated near the State Line and are possibly within the State of Connecticut. d —---------__--_ — _ OUTSIDE SWEPT PATH PATH OF FRONT WHEEL �\ j ��\V 9� INSIDE SWEPT PATH 43.25 43.4fi STEERING LOCK ANGLE=27.4 deg. ACHIEVED STEERING ANGLE: �� 20.0 k 30 deg.SWEEP ANGLE:18.0 deg. 60 deg.SWEEP ANGLE:24.1 deg. 6.17 20.00 90 deg.SWEEP ANGLE:26.3 deg. 120 deg.SWEEP ANGLE:27.0 deg. Tire Truck feet 150deg.SWEEP ANGLE:27.3 deg. �� y Width 8.17 1SO deg.SWEEP ANGLE:27.4 deg. \ Track &17 \ Lock to Lock Time 6.0 17.1 n \ Steering Angle 27 4 8.2 ft \\ Fire Truck CUSTOM VEHICLES Cfpyrigi,<«12a,zT,,,,«S,I,tio.= aFT —T —T III OD 445 Hamilton Avenue,14th Floor CUDDY& White Plains,New York 10601 ��r' Tel 414.761.1300 fax 914.761.5372 FEDEwww.cuddyfeder.com May 8, 2015 BY HAND & BY Eli AiL: mnowak(Ajyebrook.org A/1r. Gary Zuckerman, Chairman, and Mernbers.pf the Planning Board Village of Rye Brook 938 King Street Rye Brook, Ne,,v York 10573 Re: Sun Homes (Phase 3 Reckson Execrative bark) Application for Re-Mapping of Premises into the Planned Unit.Development District premises: 1100 Ding Street, Section 129.25, Block 1, Lot 1) Dear Chairman Zuckerman and Members of the Planning; Board: On behalf of Sun Homes, in furtherance of this pendir).g Application and Petition, we respectfully submit fifteen(15) copies of a Memorandum prepared by Maser Consulting, dated April 15, 2015, responding to questions raised in the March 31, 2015 Memorandum issued by Frederick P. Clark Associates, Inc. requesting additional traffic information. We look forward to reviewing the project with the Planning. Board at its May 14, 2015 meeting to address any questions and thank you for your consideration herein. 7 Respe'`u l lI rll �; Fill WSN:yp' 1�';nclosure cc (w/enclosures): Edward Beane, Esq.; Mr. Christopher Bradbury, Village Manager; Marilyn T napone=Mohamed; Miebael Galante; Messrs. Robert Dale, Bill McGuinness and Rudolf Huiter; Mr..Johii Barnes; Messrs. Gerhard M. Sx�l�walbe and Matthcvv Steinberg;Dr. John Collins; Nlr. Ronald P: Rieman; Anthony B. Gioffre III, Esq; and Ms. Norma Drummond CBcE':2763821,1 ATTORNEYS AT LAW White Plains Fishkili New York City Stamford Enginaors l i Oradhurst Memo F" Plrnners Hawrhorns, NY 10532 SUrVeYOTs T;914,347.3500 Landscape Architects F:914,347.7266 MASEREnvironmental Scientists www.maserconsutling.com M MORAN. DUM To Village of Rye Brook Planning Board Copy: Michael A. Galante,Executive Vice President Steven Cipolla,AssociatefTransportation From: John T. Collins,Ph.D.,P.E. Ronald P. Rieman,Assistant Project Manager Date: April 15, 2015 Re Sun Homes at Reckson Executive Park Rye Brook,Westchester County,New York MC Pro'ect No. 14001622A The following are responses to the Frederick P. Clark Associates, Inc. (FPC) - March 31, 2015 review memo on the Sun Homes at Reckson Executive Park Traffic Impact Study dated January 14, 2015 as outlined.below. 1. 2014 Existing Traffic Volumes— Since the existing 386,000 s.f of occupied office space is generating lower traffic volumes when compared to ITE rates, the Village's Traffic Consultants requested that the generation for the entire building (540,000 s.f.) be based on higher ITE rates. The office traffic volumes have been adjusted under No-Build Conditions, See Response 3. It should be noted that the increase of the existing 386,000 s.f of occupied office space to higher ITE rates provides a conservative evaluation of future conditions. 2. Accident Experience -Accident data was requested from the New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT) and Connecticut Department of Transportation (ConnDOT)for the latest three-year periods available in the vicinity of the site. Accident data was requested along the New York State section of Route 120A (King Street) road in the vicinity of International Drive between Reference Markers 120A 8701 3000 and 120A 8710 3002. The NYSDOT has indicated that "No record of any traffic accidents were found in this location for 2012, 2013 and 2104." A copy of the NYSDOT accident request and correspondence is contained in Appendix F. Customer Loyalti/ through Client Satisfaction 3 f f f pis' ipv Village of Rye Brook Planning Board April 15, 2015 MASER Page 2 of 4 SER The ConnDOT search provided the latest available data which covers the time period of January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2013. A copy of the ConnDOT accident request, correspondence and accident data.is also contained in Appendix F_ This accident data is summarized by accident severity (Table 1), month and year of occurrence (Table 2), hour and day of week (Table 3), hour of occurrence (Table 4), weather condition (Table 5), road surface condition (Table 6), light condition (Table 7), other roadway feature (Table 8), construction or maintenance related (Table 9), median barrier penetration (Table 10), contributing factor(Table 11),type of collision (Table 12), vehicle type (Table 13), direction of all vehicles (Table 14), offending vehicle direction (Table 15), objects struck and location(Table 16), and total injury by severity(Table 17). Over this three year period there were 4 reported accidents in 2011, 4 reported accidents in 2012 and 7 reported accidents in 2013 along Route 120A (King Street) between International Drive and Anderson Hill Road. In addition, Appendix F contains the accident experience detail reports. Based on a review of the Accident Data, the type of accidents are typical type of accidents such a rear end accidents and turning accidents with apparent contributing factors such as failure to yield right of way and driver following too close. Based on the above, "It is not expected that the proposed Residential development (110 homes)will have a significant impact on the accident rate on the area roadways." 3. No-Build Conditions — As noted in Response 1, as requested by the Village's Traffic Consultants, since the existing 386,000 s.f. of occupied office space is generating lower traffic volumes when compared to ITE rates, the generation for the entire building (540,000 s.£) was increased based on higher ITE rates. In addition traffic for The Enclave (formerly Kingswood) and the PepsiCo Master Plan was also included as part of the future No-Build Conditions. The Enclave and PepsiCo Master Plan traffic volumes are shown on Figures No. 6 and 7 and the Rcckson Executive Park increases(540,000&f based on ITE rates) are shown on Figures No. 9 and 10 with the resulting Year 2014 No- Build traffic Volumes shown on Figures No. 11 and 12. It should be noted that the increase of the existing 386,000 s.f. of occupied office space to higher ITE rates provides a conservative evaluation of future conditions. Village of Rye Brook Planning Board April 15,2015 .XV , Page 3 of 4 MAS E R. f 4. Site Traffic Generation Approved Office - The remaining approved 280,000 s.f of office space has been calculated using the fitted curve based on the difference for the total office development (820,000 s.f) and the full occupancy of the existing building (540,000 s.f.). The resulting approved 280,000 s.f. of office space would generate a total of 299 vehicles (262 entering vehicles and 37 exiting vehicles) during the Weekday Peak AM Highway Hour and a total of 314 vehicles (53 entering vehicles and 261 exiting vehicles) during the Weekday Peak PM Highway Hour. The approved 280,000 s.f. Office Traffic Volumes are shown on Figures No. 13 and 14 and the resulting Year 2019 Build Traffic Volumes with the Approved 280,000 s.f Office are shown on Figures No. 15 and 16. Proposed Residential - As noted in the Comment, the proposed Residential development trip generation was based on higher single family rates and "should be considered conservative". The proposed residential development would generate a total of 87 vehicles (22 entering vehicles and 65 exiting vehicles) during the Weekday Peak AM Highway Hour and a total of 115 vehicles (73 entering vehicles and 42 exiting vehicles) during the Weekday Peak PM Highway Hour. The Proposed Residential Traffic Volumes are shown on Figures No. 18 and 19 and the resulting Year 2019 Build Traffic Volumes with the Proposed Residential — 110 homes are shown on Figures No. 20 and 21. As outlined above, the change from Office (280,000 s.f) to Residential (110 homes) would result in 212 fewer vehicles during the Weekday Peak AM Highway Hour and 199 fewer vehicles during the Weekday Peak PM Highway Hour. 5. Site Traffic Distribution and Assignment—As noted in the comment, the site distribution and assignment for both the office and residential developments is acceptable. 6. Build Traffic Volumes - The Build Traffic Volumes have been revised based on Responses 3 and 4. 7. Traffic Impact Analysis—The SYNCHRO analysis have been rerun to reflect the existing peak hour factors and the updated traffic volumes. Appendix B contains the updated Level of Service Summary Table (Table No. 1) as well as the requested Vehicle Queue/Storage Table (Table No.,2), Village of Rye Brook Planning Board April 15, 2015 Page 4 of 4 MASER E i N I I L T I Al l A A. It should be noted, that even with the requested methodology changes including the conservative increase of the existing office generation to higher ITE rates, the proposed Residential development (110 homes) will not significantly affect the area roadways. Similar Levels of Service and delays are expected under Future No-Build and Future Build Conditions. In addition as noted in Response 4,the Proposed Residential development would result in significantly fewer vehicles(212 fewer vehicles during the Weekday Peak AM Highway Hour and 199 fewer vehicles during the Weekday Peak PM Highway Hour) and better Levels of Service when compared to the traffic generated by the approved Reckson Executive Park(R.E.P.) Phase III office building. 8. Site Plan Review Comments will be addressed by Divney Tung Schwalbe. If you have any questions on the above or need any additional information,please do not hesitate to contact us. E Traffic Impact Study Sun Hames at Reckson Executive Park MA S E R MC Project No.: 14001622A g R ,. Appendix SUN HOMES AT RECKSON EXECUTIVE PARK APPENDIX A FIGURES KING STREET (ROUTE 120A) RECKSON INTERNATIONAL DRIVE SITE EXECUTIVE PARK ANDERSON HILL ROAD KING STREET" (ROUTE 120A) NOTE:LINE DIAGRAM NOTTO SCALE SUN HOMES @ RECKSON EXECUTIVE PARK S7CH _ RYEBROO.K NEW YORK 4. 0- Avenue ..coxrl,aa urvncgc �r�rmmsnta E. a�rsa Hawthorne, NY 10532 ?Ei�ncr r, 'e'Lan ye t �3,ek.tr Phone: 914,30 500 6.i;.,e_'ih de of Auu'&p;CA:=00072 Fax: 974.347.7266 SITE LOCATION 14f)CI622A 4/08!'201 em& sdutl;005 o mase*ccnsa'tin•,cam � F Lif?C "I'll r uc'sin:ur L<y-xiy lhe3di.h ClianE 6alsiec!:nn � KING STREET (ROUTE 120A) cr d vil RECKSON INTERNATIONAL DRIVE 14 SITE EXECUTIVE Rl A 2 - A 17, n ANDERSON HILL ROAD 1 I ^G KING STREET (ROUTE 120A) NOTE:LINE DIAGRAM NOT TO SCALE SUN HOMES @ RECKSON EXECUTIVE PARK ' ' r RYE 6ROOK NEW YORK AASM '! Erodhurs; Avenue €�-ms4!�p hw 6cp�k uvik -+r n€! clglm I{eWih�irib, pdY it 932 Pfxr-s �u,�eyar5•!.��, ._ .'stere: 914 47.7:0., YEAR 2614 EXISTING TRAFFICVOLLIMES C:R Nd'J!�94�t:PWA�,T�E'.h.v.Car l'cvi::o kun .a#w.J3:a1;2Fax: u14,30,7266 WEEKDAY PEAK AM HIGHWAY HOUR 34©t:1S220)�/Wl 5an et. sdufio^.s 5 rt�aserrne.�>J.rq,ccr:h'F'h;Br;K� �' KING STREET (ROUTE 120A) 2 RECKSON INTERNATIONAL DRIVE '4 Sl TE EX PARK 4 I i e � m4 L in op in. ANDERSON HILL ROAD �I '79 197 KING STREET (ROUTE 120A) NOTE:LINE DIAGRAM NOTTO SCALE SUN HOMES @ RECKSON EXECUTIVE PARK RYE BROOK,NEW YORK �v�S ip;�„U;fn h �I F ii;E 11 9radhi rs' AYen e Cssswt g Rds e3ya d PAwbdfnt'4fr,.F,ree.e tawlhme, NY 10531 6. d,ye M use+s- ?hone: 9?4.347.75u0 YEAR 2014 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES �0 N!r!?E;: [ 'E_ ,z�.cnM1.�,Gur�rr[ *m�:COM172 'nx. 9'4,v47.7k6s WEEKDAY PEAK PM HIGHWAY HOUR 1�7oiszrr, 4/�e{2cls er.+3eil: sclulions m mess€scrsuitin ccr� fern Yana_ Vlrainh.t S• i iF. ii P1�.1rt:. . .. . . �Es!onserLgve&y!n?ooUk CEent`v'S€€,facllor KING STREET (ROUTE 120A) irtua' RECKSON INTERNATIONAL DRIVE 1 SE TE EXECUTIVE 2- 12-12 € ANDERSON HILL ROAD 1.°0 i �,cn KING STREET (ROUTE 120A) NOTE:LINE DIAGRAM NOT TO SCALE SUN HOMES @ RECKSON EXECUTIVE PARK RYE BROOK NEW YORK Y STLHEST R Orrl... 1(9€G,t!��rs t Avenue 44411 Huwthome, NY 10632. PF-": 914.347.7500 YEAR 2019 PROJECTED TRAFFIC VOLUMES NUWCR5T-: s xttt vi v.x.!GiSQ€i a£t kiia� JE 17t Fox: 914.747,7269 WEEKDAY PEAK AM HIGHWAY h10UR 4iHtt522A q/€yE1/ZC;ts email; sclakl� s w masarcgr.auiiing.ecm New J@r6�1K __.N=York.......,Pe�nsY.vania V €nla, r1Gl3RE wc7a+18E4,: Cuelo.mv;Rynl!/throw,CA.,;Snil�°nci3cr. .� KING STREET (ROUTE 120A) SITE EX C SO E INTERNA110NAL. DRIVE , PARK rE) I f�(V tl CF? ANDERSON HILL ROAD 217, KING STREET (ROUTE 120A) NOTE:LINE DIAGRAM NOT TO SCALE SUN HOMES RECKSON EXECUTIVE PARK WSMYM' iLHG �FFlSCE„ RYE4l2QC<K.IVEWYORK e i «z T j q. :r:,. 11 Br�ehu st A� nue «� Nawkhxi% NY 10532 f.tntx 4, �K=ta4t. z ArOlikeLe Phone: 914347500 YEAR 24I$PROJECTED TRAFFIC VOLUMES ,6emyW13 dv VITT"172 Fax: 914.3477266 WEEKDAY PEAK PM HIGHWAY HOUR 1 s7 !E2.2f1. ?JC>sJ261 Mew Jersey N€W York er-oil: SoMiam T3 tnaSercarisvlting.Co%i CuSLemor L.oyAty through Ciie:x".£a[l..J�n KING STREET (ROUTE 120A) C��X7 RECKSON INTERNA11ONAL DRIVE mJ SI TE EX PARK -41 ANDERSON HILL ROAD -41 s5 KING STREET (ROUTE 120A) NOTE:LINE DIAGRAM NOTTO SCALE SUN HOMES @ RECKSON f=X1=CUTIVE PARK p 1t1�STC�E�TEI�€7F�I,�E. RYE.BROOK,.i+1EWYORK 11 Brodhurst Avenue ens>ti ;3 ei a t:nrrar=�eaia E,tgioery Haw:hnrne> NY 10532 OTHER DEVELOPMENT TRAEFICVOLUMES Pscrsne�"Surge ra'L c;wpe+fr=hirccEs Phcna 914>347.7501 WEEKDAY PEAK AM HIGHWAY HOUR -ole ik.Y.Lr- ^le atA�Fat-Ller,�.v;IG'7P Fox: 914.347.7266 442??6 A � 4/0&,F21?,5 e rwi[: sulFftion: ?9 maserconsulti r com {THE ENCLAVE j PEPSICO MASTER PLAN} m,;. "qr -N BERF C.�.R'.3T8f I.W NIi�ili;Cifph GIIH!!!SaEiyfnUllrAS KING STREET (ROUTE 120A) REOKSON INTERNATIONAL DRIVE SITE EXECUTIVE PARK ANDERSON NILE ROAD 41 i;0_... KING STREET (ROUTE 120A) NOTE:LINE DIAGRAM NOT TO SCALE SUN HOMES @ RECK50N EXECUTIVE PARK STCHcSTti (JFIC , RYE BROOK,.NEW YORK it Sradhurat Avwue� ��-��/} Gansu€inq,�',iu.,lc.�cl:�„�,•.,x n m,l"��'nx�,= Hawthorn, NY 10537 OTHER DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC VOLUMES Flut;, Phne: 214,347.7530E WEEKDAY PEAK PM HIGHWAY HOUR �7�ie ai .Y.fP 3kb ni E i3 n i ikra 0T.N7 FCX: f 4.347.7266 eToii sciutia s (THE ENCLAVE/PFPSICO MASTER PLAN) oG1622A G,(laji.tfy me3ercoa.ul,ing.cam GU F€ RU 7 `�UVEIFR: hlow Jai ry, _�Av�Voik_.__Ps,rs}4v+�n�a �'6eini� - ; ws.nr.^erin4�tV l7"roue.L�a Sa7_�i;;a'u;, �_. KING STREET (ROUTE 120A) C.1 RECKSON INTERNATIONAL DRIVE • r� SITE EXECUTIVE PARK j ,r { F` co ANDERSON HILL ROAD I*- v KING STREET % — ARRIVAL (ROUTE 120A) % —DEPARTURE NOTE:LINE DIAGRAM NOTTO SCALE SUN HOMES @ RECK50N EXECUTIVE PARK WE.Sir IESI:E2 OFf ICS RYE BROO]C,NEW YORK #*4' s tt.i'x s r:s .a s it Sradnurs, Av nue `� �■���/J Cnava i§q.tJ 0,44 4,tm+mrxn nl[nay rse a Hawthorne. N Y 10532 1Ea ax R$y mase a spa F ur rcis„ Pnone: 014.347.7500 ARRIVAL/DEPARTURE DISTRIBUTION Er.[ao1kY.PpaxKn#r{d Wthra.n, xM;o4:1 "ex: 914.347.72fio (OFFICE) i400i632h. 4/13j2Jiu email: solutions maserccn�ulting.com ,URE 9Jfi� E : heN Je-u�Y.,.,._h�enY ri< f'ennsy{van= 1:iminiV C:usUTA':er t.�yaliy fhroumh C?3ot 5s!iaiaca � KING STREET (ROUTE 120A) SITE EK KSON INTERNATIONAL DRIVE .41 PARK (r.3 t' ANDERSON HILL ROAD U KING STREET (ROUTE 120A) NOTE:LINE DIAGRAM NOT TO SCALE SUN HOMES @ RECKSON EXECUTIVE PARK ��TCIiES ER OFFC RYE BROOK,NEW YORK #vN 0 f r t r.r s�, 11 Brodhurst 4wnue Hawt^orae,NY 110532 Ler�lt�..11tpa9�tY!vrenren{d Chaucer, RECKSDN EXECUTIVE PARK-540,000 S.F, 1l rc s l.kq ta.tow crr n Ar ixl c!' phorfe' 914.347.7500 NUN E.- Ate; t 4)Ani rmt Wffily; Fcc 914.347.7266 (ITC TRIP RATES) sou€ons C-0 r„ ,! WEEKDAY PEAK AM HIGHWAY HOUR 14viE22A 0_/201;1 cnfc€ fflaszrcvnsu �na,cofn hax 3er9 Nc:v yo-'k !'enris hvanie Vircxi;tiz __.. _._ usErimnr ea:�cliy fh:.Hrft:CI':anl Sa',sfacifen �S KING STREET (ROUTE 120A) r� RECKSON SITE EXECUTIVEINTERNATIONAL DRIVE •a� PARK cel 4? U'C1 ANDERSON HILL ROAD KING STREET (ROUTE 120A) NOTE:LINE DIAGRAM NOT TO SCALE SUN HOMES @ RECKSOIN EXECUTIVE PARK ism RYE BROOK.NEW YORK �'r5f(HSTR D�IIG1 Y r, 11 U adhurst Avenue Hawthorne, NY 1052 CaraaN'r�g,fir: lllAl .LU[ICtrFye E5a1%k s RECK50N EXECUTIVE PARK-54Q,OOQS.F_ PIonR-rx° ::�enrc'lu€ctiye tieu€wwix !'hone: 91 .347.75{)7 £3 1tkitr l�f�ik:.: Sia'4 c. �(A 5amida Ctht4t 1-E1X: 91 A.347.72GE (ITE TRIP RATES} 1406-1622A #!08/2015 emcil; solutions rnsefca3s ltir^.corn WEFKDAY PEAK PM HIGHWAY HOUR €;_. Iv'aw J,,,V New York Pmlrl. _Org4rla 5 !-IGUR; t,4 MF. f:. CuutAr_rnr 1-a141�'/r�mnph G€ie'et Sa:ialnr,Ein:: i p KING STREET (ROUTE 120A) RECKSON INTERNATIONAL DRIVE 4.� SITE EXCEUTivE '1 ANDERSON HILL ROAD i 4A KING STREET (ROUTE 120A) NOTE:LINE DIAGRAM NOT TO SCALE SUN HOMES @ RECKSON EXECUTIVE PARK 15TC ISTERI„C , RYE BROOK,NEW YORK 11 gni�wst Avenue :x.�:�llvir#i€n1zil:oV 8 F.i:rresr:nrs:iud Yr.ir:'Ps hawthxrig, NY 1032 re •l,en�s pr 4ch acts Phone: 014.34-7 7500 YEAR 20119 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES X13 acicv€w'.r.s�.�lii}IaiR�-,a'.rrnr.r. ;r��1�2 Fax: 914.347.72. 6 WEEKDAY PEAK AM HIGFIWAY HOUR t���?1e22z 4/Gay°2:x'5 ernaiv volutions meserconsu€king,com a ..�@_.....S;usionu;Loyaly ir`rc;u+R Gli:xE SaGsracli3r .. KING STREET (ROUTE 120A) rte.a7 RECKSON INTERNATIONAL DRIVE +F� SI TE EXECUTIVE PARK 1 [�� n� V ANDERSON HILL ROAD305 C.0 yif" KING STREET (ROUTE 120A) NOTE:LINE DIAGRAM NOT TO SCALE SUN HOMES @ RECKSON EXECUTIVE PARK l I S iRYE BRQQK NEW.YORIC.. .r a s to 2 t A r:►s is A ti E3radhursi Avenue Coes`rq M nr �,&'3v ocm [.uinccrs Hm. thorre, NY 111h32 t,rEti =,, sycrss geAr. wif. Phone: 514.347.'590 YEAR 2019 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES JUS NIJMBLR: C7. I S;¢fe;;f .v,C:rkl6cets o r.En-�ki,i:Us33'2 rot; 914-347.7266 WEEKDAY PEAK PM HIGHWAY HOUR 1�oo1622A 4/aaj^6775 email: solutions 0 momrconsMing corn New!ase..r...,..,._,Nfa tle^k..,..,..,. 9L�} Guatenwr k.oy,r'rg[ivrvyN CliuW SaE�tncrla KING STREET (ROUTE 120A) 3 ri RECKSON INTERNATIONAL DRIVE SITE EXECUTIVE PARR 26.... fv ANDERSON HILL ROAD e KING STREET (ROUTE 120A) NOTE;LINE DIAGRAM NOT TO SCALE SUN HOMES @ RECKSON EXECUTIVE PARK WESTCHBIER QFFICE, RYk ROOK NF—WYOR.K .. � { ,kus.4fgt# btw+sm rsia 'sqe^.re Hawthorne; NY 40532 APPROVED ase�;§�as�ars" yxcpa krFiiects phone-. 914.347.750 SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES Stafs of#.x: k#aslctd'}743rHr rte uiki7�� Fax: 9#4.347.7266 WEEKDAY PEAK AM HIGHWAY HOUR rqr n 14s�1�22A �JGS/?„#a amcil: so`:utiens mn,.to rnmerconsult::� ;Je,N dersav Ney Ye pen,rapPlxni_virg nke,. 5 {OFFICE-280,000 S.F.} tuaiotr:e�r ioyxly!fvnuyt!Gli�ri S:vlffmr:dui �� KING STREET (ROUTE 120A) SITE EXE.IU VE INTERNATIONAL DRIVE '4JPARK 78-- r- Co cx r3.— ANDERSON 3.— ANDERSON HILL ROAD J ICING STREET (ROUTE 120A) NOTE-LINE DIAGRAM NOT TO SCALE SUN HOMES @ RECKSON.EXECUTIVE PARK WESTCI ESLER OFFICE RYE BROOK,NEW YORK 11 Erodhurst Aue:'ue s�sv€tnq#tr r tt rtarrtenEal Enuicearc 1lowthorrle, NY 10532 APPROVER l s Hgsaa'lsxrshcepeA hileh Phone: 914.347.7500 SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES JQ6 Nul:uE ER: CHAT: tinl�9l.t'Y,C,ra{Ka€sea`>isSfc;�al�nOG�iit� Fix: 914.347.?266 WEEKDAY PEAK PM HIGHWAY HOUR '4C:�J52<f� 4�Gsj2ixl� . email: solutions ra'maser o;;eulting.com (OFFICE-280,COO S.F.) € C iStJ ei:i Neu+3a•.sr.•. R:ewYei �`e•naylvlrEa,_4r�7Ezi.�_ E%usb�IWt,3v3iPr;P7ou1h:;I'ent 9a[is€ncEcn KING STREET (ROUTE 120A) RECKSON INTERNATIONAL DRIVE SITE EX PARK ,� f+ ;7'.i[3� •iii ANDERSON HILL ROAD KING STREET (ROUTE 120A) NOTE:LINE DIAGRAM NOT TO SCALE SUN HCNVIES @ RECKSON EXECUTIVE PARK RYE BROOK NEW Y©RK.... YVEfiTCNE5TER OFFICE 11 Brndhurst Averse Huse".borne, NY 10532 YEAR 2019 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES P�annrs .0 t.Ls tat#%acts Phone: 914.31-7.7500 WEEKDAY PEAK AM HIGHWAY HOUR j0B N Sia o`n,Y,L,1N:ctt of Aa kzffidLi ..7UHM l 914.347.7266 :4QQt622A 4 E 3b/2.015 email: solutions c mcserccnwif in .com (W/APPROVED 280`000 S.F,OFFICE) Nv.v J[rb[ '3.v Yuck, ut ti3114e :a it rCr,E� 9 f�;, �^_xr L�Sa�w�rtibi c uil:i0'.=1a_"strt 15 KING STREET (ROUTE 120A) RECKSON INTERNATIONAL DRIVE . SITE EXECUTIVE •a 4 SCCU ANDERSON HILI. ROAD I c 2 A KING STREET (ROUTE 120A) NOTE:LINE DIAGRAM NOT TO SCALE SUN HOMES @ RECKSON EXECUTIVE PARK ,u RYE BROOK NEW YORK d1E� S E R It 11 Bfcd 11 7r�dhurst Ave,iue ar,s.ti+e,Me31 G Erx�� ntn u;-.neer:: puw ° " IVY 10532 YEAR 2019 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES Pcnaes'' uwwrs" .c,dt..ads P cnn 3''4.�47.;5GD WEEKDAY PEAK PN{HIGHWAY HOUR J6 t R' S'saie a'M,.. rkiiicn€=_of h�ih,za,ion:x][1772 Fax: 914.347.726,5 1400'622.4 4/011f201 5 . z.1-Ai: s (W/APPROVED280,000 S.F.OFFICE) N, Perk__...Fan�syfN?kni �I_ii'dV.. 3fF fist: r 3z .- Cus;c:r.rr I.cyalk,;rrrr;:�-yh�E?rte! nilaf�ri'an j KING STREET (ROUTE 120A) RECKSON INTERNATIONAL DRIVE SI TE EXECUTIVE �m PARK -- I.. h £2 ANDERSON HILL ROAD L+ KING STREET % - ARRIVAL (ROUTE 120A) [%] -DEPARTURE NOTE:LINE DIAGRAM NOT TO SCALE SUN HOMES @ RECKSON EXECUTIVE PARK "S ChIFSTE QFFIC. RYE BROOK NEW YORK MASM �__ __. »T 11 6ru:lhurst f,v�ue C a Aas ystwVa 9 h Endnnen a ena�ru Hcwt inc, PiY 10532 p-t r Sri s=t«ac x a'o1 c€� P�;ene' 914.347:750© ARRIVAL/DEPARTURE DISTRIBUTION uC3C3 3IliM8iR llA1: ?a;+tf I:v.i:Sr1e, » AI AAnFa N.' 944 73 F'C#; 314.347.i").fis !1 � (RESIDENTIAL aic:€22n 4j08/205 email: saluiion.s e�masercvasultin corn til r{.:c�rye� Ney-Ye.� i��,nns v=ria i.�Erc,�n=e 4 'FtillRi:hlt3iti IM. Ci3�,.,re.La/siy.l�rvgn CeIErs,La.iLEec�or¢ KING STREET (ROUTE 120A) r-o RECKSON INTERNATIONAL DRIVE •M' �I SITE ExEARK� 46......E 07 ANDERSON HILL ROAD -W T KING STREET (ROUTE 120A) NOTE:LINE DIAGRAM NOTTO SCALE SUN HOMES @ RECKSON EXECUTIVE PARK RYE BROOK,NEWYORK srcrESTt nrcl '1 (bra f>urst A�%aLe 440 " cxomtiz,;�k';'sr 4.ravromvrtel Cgnwr ilowthoine N.x,053'. PPROPOSED rid "aseyaEc�kflktro,Gth:c;, Phon?; 9Id.u4„75Gp SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES IS3I3 Hl#DSx &: Rtfx Foxy 9'4.347.7256 WEEKDAY PEAK AM HIGHWAY HOUR 140 ,s22A en,alE: soluf ins �a m�serconsEvlting.cani (RESIDENTIAL—110 HOMES) F'aCu 2E '..V'g R ;lgv„JGr�v_ New Yn?n f?ernsylur._nEsn ,sesteineY LtytE;y fh.:a,�h Cliar,,ge�is'�:con �� KING STREET (ROUTE 120A) y� cv o SITE ExECu 1� INTERNATIONAL DRIVE PARK :n ANDERSON HILL ROAD �► . ... - ,¢ ' C3 s1- KING STREET (ROUTE 120A) NOTE:LINE DIAGRAM NOTTO SCALE SUN HOMES @ RECKSON EXECUTIVE PARK WE_STCHESTER OFFICE RYE BROOK.NEW YORK t me, M 105r :er.yiing,Muni l i*w.me a Ergsrerrs Hew?hame. MY 1L532 PROPOSED Ptsrn�;"Surccr�r. E ;d,.qae l�rc;ite�ts Phone: r314,347,7s ' SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES _ECB NUMBER: -DATE: 9n;�gE x.r.eP;�ur;m'a ihil n.Llm,�tsasM Fug: 914.347.7266 WEEKDAY PEAK PM HIGHWAY HOUR 400,F,22A 4/08/2"1" e eil; alu,ions e,r cre°nons;t�ng.c n (RESIDENTIAL-110 HOMES) FIGURE Nu l.flIf z �ir<y Jc•sey._.,..,_lJer:York _Perravl•���ls V'ryr3k. f�estrcSrsrUyalEr lixrup�Clio..5zris�cEicv,^, � KING STREET (ROUTE 120A) C'TtF) SITE E�CKSON INTERNATIONAL DRIVE PARK Ct1.(i t�1•- ANDERSON HILL ROAD A 144— KING 4—KING STREET (ROUTE 120A) NOTE:LINE DIAGRAM NOTTO SCALE SUN HOMES @ RECKSON EXECUTIVE PARK MASMS CtIESTER OFFE, RYE BRQOK N:EW.YORK: Ammll B°ndhursl Avenue 1���///J n:a3,tc� r2a CrA errs F�irc�.F Huxthoma, NY 1Q532 YEAR 2014 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES t E- €1w ign NAmt, f hang: 934„34,7.75{1( 7 S �tU Eft ;_-D TE: ME72 Fax: 914,347.7268 WEEKDAY PEAK AM HIGHWAY HOUR email: salEitions c-mossra3nsulkiniq.com {W/PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL-110HO20 MES] 14061 $�A G3/2M Ctic!�',JS;a•'y N.�u1'a�fc �a�nstl�ani� Vi• i��:a_ I'10�0{ :0}e1C51�' G !�rn, r.eya€:y lfmugh Cienf Satsa�con KING STREET (ROUTE 120A) r RECKSON INTERNATIONAL DRIVE SITE EXECUTIVE I PARK ?et rY 0 x, x t Asa m ANDERSON HILL ROAD rF� Mr KING STREET (ROUTE 120A) NOTE;LINE DIAGRAM NOT TO SCALE SUN HOMES @ RECKSON EXECUTIVE PARK RYE WESTCHESTER OFFICE BROOK NEWYDRIC � c p s d i r i e a r.�. 11 9ra�harst Avenue ur.uiE q, w�l- Erflr< Enins r9in�;s Hawfharne: NY 10532 YEAR 2019 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES InG,3i 5.ew'�vr Ec��sr�yz Cchilu.4s Phone: 414.347.7500JOE9 M0.108VR. tkT, el it n aY Ca is.�;e cth5prirrfie� s'kRM 914.:i,47.7266 s 4�WEEKDAY PEAK PM HIGHWAY HOUR -0101 r22A LEsf 201 rax' em�,'I: snE tions masercnnsltir .cort� (W/PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL-110 HOMES) �.�rJ�s,r� �etivYn I>ers g �Glt2 1`tlf�th3eF?. Traffic Impact Study Suri Homes at Reckson Executive Park MASER MC Project No.: 14001622A Appendix tsaetwnwwRah'taimexev�w�'zmma?m.uws.rtzMnKxHMhIMAx�wu^wixusxp�x.:'�:x<x'.':..�.•vKezuaswuwui'u'pits*xzeuuuuziswura<unttuuuuattux�annzxz:zxrxhnxcxutNxi�dx�d�xzxrzppsviw�txiawtuMsuspvwx.�dx[izHzaua�x.:A- SUN HOMES AT RECKSONEXECUTIVE PARK APPENDIX B TABLES .. ....... ... TABLE NO.1 LEVEL OF SI=RVICE SUMMARY TABLE __. YEAR 201 BUIL YEAR 2019 BL'IL7 YEAR 2014 EXISTING YEAR 2013 NO-DUIL .. VW A.P.PRQVF-l)2&J.DMS,F..DFF!Ctr W PF:DR(OSED RE$IOEYTAIL-11 C HOMES {, £ WEEKDAY WEEKDAY VF-EKDAY WEEKDAY AlEEKDAY V�IEEKO6.Y WEEKDAY - � WErWIUAY I LOCATION AM PM AAS pm.. AAS! PM AM PPA i [ KING STREET(ROUTE 129Aj - ANDERSLN HILL KOAD [ SIGNALIZED NO t'�"€)'U ND LITE'[` A 14.51 A[6,71 €3111 61 6 l',3(31 B[14.$1 tt G[29 of NORTHWUND TNkot)oN A 16.41 A,$'-t1 9[15-1] A[7.81 C[25 11 S A[3 9 B 1+. 7) A[8 t .. 'J#t3:.A1?F'ROACH � A[8,17 . . A IS.2'1:'-, B f14.41:: -: A{S.B] G'1<5ibl C 11 2 41 `.a3{15 fi3 A1s s1 I �I 2Ati'�f� B[121.91 B 11 al) D[,k 7] C(27,47 C[20,:3; [20,21 ww'E[13e-qAt R"TA111,01 A11.B3 A[zs7 A[ i] Al2.a1 Al2.2 Af2-' A 21 9[1$2]�.� G[2:i7] R{16;51 E][r53 j "t+ t€WD LEFT D[42,41 'i]['5-31 D147-61 D[39.3] D 14s:•�1 D,39.8, D[47.7-1 0;N E i VA�MOUND ff#GldT D 14� J D[�7J D M91. F[[ac:'2 DI C1a1 2] [a e, F[1 d 1 Til `7 D[. 1 ] [47: [rs 6 '..: Is{7.c] IE 7911. ... "E"31.4]'" -:.' Wi SIGNAL OPTIMIZATION NORTHBOUND LEFTR[5,E] C[23.0] E A[S.St F[95-51 cs(11 3 C pa--] ] NORTHBOUND THROUGH B[-52,1] A[9:51 15X18.9" A JE.61 6 112 6; B rtC sl ti B:C12.7 is cCnl g;[ 23 B.1144] T 1 $OUTI MOUND THROUGH -- •^-"^^• B 11 B.7]- - C[?5.:91 SOUTHB(7UND RIGHT - -•^-^• A 13.21 A 11.31 A[3.B1, A 11.1] A f3 r, A[1.31 ,$OL3OUTHiJOUNO.PRt)ACH': B.(17rij _...4(2491 ._ WESTBOUND LEFT - -_..�, E[56.11 C[34 3] E 178.51 0 PL311 21 .: E(56,41 C 1a4,61 WESTBOUND RIGHT --- E(55.,51, E[6G-51 E[39-21 F(B7 7�,1 H[55.41 E.Irz-1-31 [ ,. VJESTBOUND•'RPPft47A H - .. ...:-.--.._:. - ..I..; .....:::»..` I' E[57A]:. D({i;:5] '`;. E{%F. ;~:[7[t ] ...... .E-.€a`T.11 .T3[51.3,] I tiVERA3 t iNT Ft EGE1gN _ 3[18C 128.51 C 124.1]X. j 2 KING STREET(ROUTE 120A)6 j INTERNATIONA1-DRfVE(RECKSON EXECUTIVE PARK) [f f SIGNALI2'e0 No LEFT -A[271 A[,3.01 F 1;83:1] A I6-gj F[433.2] A[9 91F:220.7] 5 NORTHBOUND THROUGH R[3,41 A[5,q_ A(,8j 8 111.x) A 16. B 1'13 5 A l .4] 6 t t P 1 1 :. NQFTHEOVINoAPPR4ACH [3 ):: w[s.51;: E � aji1,11 F[2a6,.L. e[13t71. .. FPO71 $[ is- 1 f SOUTHBOUND THROUGH A 11001 A[7.51 C[21.1] a EM51 G;22.11 C MJ31 C 12261 C[4.31 1 SOUTHBOUND RIGHT A p-31 Ail-2] ... A 75,-31 - A 12..11 A[3.71 A 12 21 = A["w21 A II 2j A PAI A 17.5:1 ! ::r.: 8137`.-2'] :.:.:1#[18.7] : .13117-31 ..: ...:G- VVESTBOUND LEFT C[29:.0]. -C[33:21 C 130.61 D fags 811 G[31;91 D M-11 C Pi ❑[35.11 WESTBOUND RIGHT B[16,S1 B 11x:7] B[12.4[ C[27-31 B Iiia _ F[105,41 B(11.2] F.186.2] f4:fiTC1! :C 13131 ov 12ALL1NTF�?5EgT1GN'. . ?' A1!x31,: A{a:a75' 1[47.71 3[is.z] F[Ii9a] q`(43a7 E:1 -�1 0[21.4 fVVl SIGNAL OPTIMIZATION t NORTHBOUND LFT - - - D J50.C] A IR,51 F 18-.21 D[39 7] D[45:01 B 14-j I �--� A]3.$1 B 11431 A 13,81 C[2T<] A 3 ia] B S 11 NORTHHOUNDTHROUGH _ E Ni3RTH9gtl.Np:'APPROACH ....:�..�... .: G121A - L:B[13.T'1 .. -,�D.I42i2]:.:..,. . .... ..�C,[2s31: 1 ..SOUTHBOUNO THROUGH _ _ •,�^,- C.129,91 G[2 El .E 107 RI I)[40,71 ... r 13-2:2] C 443.41 SOUTHBOUND RIGHT --^- ---' A 7.?1 A(1,41 B IJ[53.ij["2.0]., ..A(1.41 A[7,61 A;1.41 SGVTFMOUNl>APPI?QACH e'[ 1 al9ssi . s�[4 o) ..C(n91 .:.._ Cr2Al WESTSOUND LEFT .. ..�.�,- 'D 145-21 C[317.21 D[48,9] G(23-8] D[:�.-9] c 30 0; WESTBOUND RICHT •-.�--. ----- C[11.61 G[32.41 C[22.51 E[£0 51 G[22.0) D 13E.9i . ...".:.1/tiESTBOUND'APPR33ACH �.......,:. :....Clm l ..:.0[31 Ji C(305] <.Tj[403:8] ..0[x2.9] .... C ...: ".GVERAti:}PI7>=RSEGTI4N -.:. -: ,._...,,„ �.as:�..:. :.'.:._G X47 .....'�:C 724-Bl .','B[461] '¢14q,6] .:G[2f's9).. .:.. G 122.81 - MC 14001522A THE ABOVE.REPRESENTS]`HE LEVELS OF SEWCE AND VEHICLE DELAY IN SECONDS FON THE A9QVE INTERSECTIONS A-RL E,2315 TARLE 1uo_2 QUELJE SUMMARY TABLE-5EN5l7'IVHY ANALYSES 2019 BUILD YEAR 2319 BQILD j YEAR 2014.EXISTING YEAR 2019 NO-8WLC1 "APPROVER 280,00Q S-F,OFFICE VYF PROPCJ9i D RE.TDENTIA€.-110 HOMES ! STORAGE WEEKD YAM WEEKDAYPR� W_PJ1AYAM Vy EKDAYPM .� WEEKDAYAM � MI_KOAY M .._WEEKDAYAM WEEKDAY PFA........... LOCATION IN FEET) 50th%s 96th% 50th% 951h% 50th% 95th% 5M% 95tH% 5(1th% 95th% 5Ot3�% 95th% 501h% 95111% :i4]tIl'a 95th:6 I 1 KING STREET(ROUTE 120A)8 ANDERSON HILL ROAD 5EGNALIZED _ NORTHBOUND LEFT '75 16 38 22 40 = 45 87 28 87 5() 1W, 4F3 114 45 114 A 28 82 NORTH BOUND THROUGH 'WO 128 252 108 158 35B 164 145 21tf 600 1053 a 158 223 372 633 lag 26 1 SOUTHBOUND iHROUCH 13S 18_1 335 220 334 284 458 437 710 # 322 484 647 - 937 4 315 - 5G6 4CM 746 #, SOUTHBOUND RIGHT Gut] 7 15 T 16 21 35 15 25 21 35 18 31 22 8 15 27 V4iESTEQUND LEFT 250 89 124 44 8E 115 169 S7. 156 139 214 65 160 116 1110 9c 162 ESTBOUND RIGHT 500 G9 125 121 203 # 151 219 �- 389 # S7 15i 219 389 # 67 1's1 2_10 3F5 WEr #j VW SIGNAL OPTIMIZATION NORTHBOUND LEFT 75 -- -- 42 68 33 89 # 4tt 1 55 53188 # 42 100 33 S1 # NORTHBOUND THROUGH 332 519 170 247 ) 470 981 # 1E5 M 238 343 53S 1110 276 SOUTHBOUND THROUGH 135 --- --- 307 446 425 6?9 5 333 494 546 676 # 337 333 4:� 734 # SOUTHBOUND RIGHT 200 27 45 9 16 31 52 10 16 25 4), ':0 16 VVESTSOUND LEFT 250 - •-. -+F 123 225 # 57 147 144 2SO # 94 1513 124 227 i WESTUOt1ND RIGHT 500 93 176 # 194 338 # 94 166 ii 203 379 9 53 176 it t94 348 2 KING STREET(ROUTE 120A)8 }NTERNATIONAL CRIVF(RECKSON EXECUTIVE PARK) ' 1 SIGNALIZED [ NORTHBOUND LEFT 450 9 20 1 5 21S 414 # 16 32 420 -- 654 # 25 44 244 45U 4 2:1 46 6 NORTHBOUND THROUGH 450 80 144 93 162 107 210 2290 324 112 238 245 324 111 246 2,41, 324 ; SOUTHROUND THROUGH 800 158 211E 83 253 266 539 # 283 400 274 512 0 301 490 278 569 k ! 301 400 SOUTHODUND RIGHT "Z25 4 11 0 221 37 4 9 31 53 6 11 22 38 6 12 WESTBOUND LEFT 250 1 7 32 64 ii 3S 92 145 16 42 144 212 20 49 100 152 WESTBOUND RIGHT 250 0 15 0 42 0 34 78 - io9 0 3S 3U5 - 450 # D 43 101 233 q W!SIGNAL OPTIMIZA71ON % F � i NORTWBOUNpLEF7 450 — --- .... �- 454 390 #� 19 86 3!'4;1 - SS1 }€ 37 i0G # 115 419 '#. 33 ;A I o NORTHBOUND THROUGH 450 81 125 7.70 3615 fl1 125 347 559 81 2E 275 365 S0U7'H13UUN13THROUGH 800 372 627 # 28-a 396 421 - 711 # 348 503 ' 382 639 S 292 390 SOUTHBOUND RIGHT 325 42 71 3 6 81 132 4 t3 45 r! m 8 i t WESTBOUND LEFT 250 14 40 87 137 2.1 52 119 175 n 57' 1? 85 146 NIG5TUQUND RIGHT 2C'0 -+ - --- 0 40 114 2EW # 0 aF # 297 463 V 0 64 # 13B 271 THE 50TH PERCENTILE AND 95TH PERCENTILE QUEUES BASED ON THE SYNCHRO ANALYSIS -VOLUME EXCEEDS RAPACITY,QUEUE IS THEORETICALLY INFMI TE. QUEUE SHOVdN IS M V;MUM AFTER TWO CYCLES. #95TH PERCENTILE VOLUME EXCEEDS CAPACITY,QUEUE MAY BE LONGER, QUEUE SHOWN IS MAXIMUM AF t'ER 1WO CYCLF-S. m VOLUME FOR 96TH PERCENTILE QUEUE IS METERED BY UPSTREAM SIGNAL t,!C14Cf0`.622A APWL B.2C4i Traffic Impact Study Sun Homes at Reckson Executive Park ASM MC Project No.: 14001622A t�s:ate �ps r.a. Appendix SUIS HOMES A T RECKSON EXECUTIVE PARK APPENDIX C LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS Traffic Impact Study Suer Hornes at Reckson Executive Park MASER NIC Project No.: 14001622A Appendix ,e.ka t.c.rcx.xn.xxr rxsv F,-i,n..xr>M.z(s:x.f-.eMYtK-ee.xscsT/,wwe.nxtnuvxwrxwcwnfw_x=xwer _xac k.a.urx.xe xx>'nouz<.+.K.xr-r.nna,F.x=exwcc.u.oc, mce.:c:rcirc- _ .x.0:ur, k4..oh.enn :',(x..::.,.-:e LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS LEVEL OF SERVICE FOR S1GNa1ZFD.JNJFRSECT1ONS Level of Service (LOS) can be characterized for the entire intersection, each intersection approach, and each lane group. Control delay alone is used to characterize LOS for the entire intersection or an approach. Control delay and volume-to-capacity (v/c) ratio are used to characterize LOS for a lane group. Delay quantifies the increase in travel time due to traffic signal control. It is also a measure of driver discomfort and fuel consumption. The volume-to- capacity ratio quantifies the degree to which a phase's capacity is utilized by a lane group. LOS A describes operations with a control delay of 10 slveh or less and a volume-to-capacity ratio no greater than 1.0. This level is typically assigned when the volume-to-capacity ratio is low and either progression is exceptionally favorable or the cycle length is very short. If it is due to favorable progression, most vehicles arrive during the green indication and travel through the intersection without stopping. LOS B describes operations with control delay between 10 and 20 s/veh and a volume-to- capacity ratio no greater than I.O. This level is typically assigned when the volume-to-capacity ratio is low and either progression is highly favorable or the cycle length is short, More vehicles stop than with LOS A. LOS C describes operations with control delay between 20 and 35 s/veh and a volume-to- capacity ratio no greater than 1.0. This level is typically assigned when progression is favorable or the cycle length is moderate. LOS D describes operations with control delay between 35 and 55 s/veh and a volume-to- capacity ratio no greater than 1.0. This level is typically assigned when the volume-to-capacity ratio is high and either progression is ineffective or the cycle length is long. Traffic Impact'Study Sun Homes at Reckson Executive Park MASER NIC Project No.: 14001622A Appendix SUN HOMES A T RECKSON EXECUTIVE PARK APPENDIX D CAPACITY ANALYSIS YEAR 2014 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES WEEKDAY PEAK AM HIGHWAY HOUR 1: ANDERSON HILL. ROAD & KING STREET 120A) 4/8;2015 Lane Configurations ` Ideal Flaw(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Lanes Lane Util, Factor 1 1.00 1.00 1A0 1.00 1,0D P, B€ke Factor:. �tQ DA. ... }� ....:. . .. ...... .. ... Frt 0.850 0.:85.0 Satd,Flow.(prQt) 1719 1810 1810 1538 1719: i538 Flt J?a(tr[tlAd °. 1L) '. ; xf �4 � „ .. __ ;......_ ` Sail Flow(perm) 559 1810 1810 1538 1676 1464 F3tturtr xtn_Fs . . .. : . ... .. _ Satd Flow(RTQR) Link Distance(ft) 1255 21349 2795 me' .2 .... :. 1 . . .... ... . ConfJ,Peds (#lhr) 10 10 10 10 Fa --:-#HourFacor..... ff... ..{F9 ......O;B4 _... 14.. ., g4 .. .._ 4. Heavy Vohicies{°/0) 51/6 6% 6% 6% 510 5% Shared Lane Tri flcji— (�h) Enter Blocked Intersection No leo No No No No {1p ��I edlantlhd ft) n HFI r r� -F� a. M 12 12 12 Crosswalk Widlh(ft) 16 16 16 Twp way Leif Turrk In F ;. .. Headway Facttor 1.00 1.00 1,00 1 00 100 100 Dumber of Detectors 1 1 1 1 1 1 Leading Detector(ft) 60 60. 50 50 50 50 .. ... Tta�ltng EaeteoEar,.(�). .`,.:�...... .. _ 0 .. .... 0._....`: �...... . .� ... ;� �.:.. . . .� ... . :;.... ..;; . .. .. ... . Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 a :0 D 0 0 Detector 1 Type Cl-Ex Ct+£x 0+Ex CI+£x CI+Ex Q+Ex Deter}'p�1 Channel ....:. .. . Detector 1 Extend(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ..._....'�.�, :....;1� Datectnr 1 C belay'(s) 0,0 D.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0.0 k Turn Protectad Phases 1. 6 2 24 4 3 Detector Phase ~1 6 2 24 4 4 U. Minimum In€tlal,(s) 4,0 4.0 4,0 4 0 4.0 4.0 i4001622A AMEX Synchra 8 Report Page 1 YEAR 2014 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES WEEKDAY PEAK AM HIGHWAY HOUR 1: ANDERSON HILL ROAD & KING STREET Q2,2A 4i8015 Total Split(s) 15.0 75,0 60.0 25,0 25.0 20.0 T�tal_ If.(°J°).._f2. .. "�_ `3ra . E; °u 2t3•$° . � _ ° ..,_.._17°k Maximum Green(s) 10.0 70.0 55.0 20,0 20.0 18.0 ....: f....... . .. ' Nit All—Red Time(�7s) }/ 1 0 1.0 1�C 1.0 1.0 0.0 _ .. Total Lost Time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 LadlLg. CPa�f Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes A. . Recall Mode Nono Max Max None None, None. Flash pant Walk(s) (� ) aiall #Itrc) } 110 Act Eft Gr((e�� n}(s) 71"1 71A � 58,5 76.7 14,1 14.1 M *' ,#a.., ��x tix�L3rL� ......... � �u�IC }Ratio 7� .�j1 0..24 0.51 D.54 0,077 D{�A8p 0,756 r. Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 D.0 fl,0 0.0 LCIS A A B A D D Approach LOS A 6 D Q'' rfe l~engtn SQx off) >r fi28 Queue Length 05th(ft) 38 252 339 18 124 126 11.7 ...2r _.i3nf ,., ` ' ..`.. .... ....... : Turn Bay Length(ft) 75 2.00 250 ;17- Starvation 1TStarvation Cap Redactn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Stcrage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Repc ,v£ fafia ....... .�?: .. C# 1. � . . . .. Cycle Length 120 %, i Ckcl trait th 93 2 ,' .:. ... ...... Natural Cycle,70 0,011 Of Maximum v/c patio;0.56 (rit5ee6atitg�ti >�}h7ay:r1S .. fgter5ect<ar� .. Intersection Capacity Utilization 53,5%° ICU Level of Service A Analsisert{ii0 .:f:. ' its and Phases; 1:ANDERSON HILL ROAD&KING STREET 120A A)01 02 04 Ev$ �.��V�'E rr' 8 ',a* + 06 Page 2 YEAR 2014 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES WEEKDAY PEAK AM HIGHWAY HOUR 2: INTERNATIONAL DRIVE & KING STREET 120A a�st2o15 Lane Configurations ..'1;.2 Ideal Flaw(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1904 1900 .X25 ,. .' 5t7..... .. .: .. .:.:�54 . .'�r.la.... . .. :.. . Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 Lane Utll. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.0.0 1,00 1.00 1.00 I�'diEltaFactar. :, :.1'_ 0 � . .....O:g __.,..... .. . Prt y { 0 650 0.&50 aii- Satcl-Flow(prat) 1810 1538 1719 1814 1719 1538 Itlarrttlttdd _ .. a Satd Flow(perm) 1810 1497 525 1814 1684 1477 R�t�h riCn o11_Rd. , 1. . ... :.:.... . 5_...__ . . Satd Flows(RT'OR) 12 Link Distance(ft) 1049 2645 152Q Tre+�e3 Time(s).,.:`. .... . � .. .. . . . _ tConrfii.Peds,(#,yhr`) 10 10 tQ -(1.0 HFeavy Vehicles(%) ° % 6% v � r -fit! 5/v 5 5 �.}�ay . P�? .� r ., _ ... Shared Lane Traffic(%) i ?t Enter Blocked Intersection Na No No No Na No .......... _.... Median Vtldth(ft) 12 12 12 Crosswalk WOO) 16 15 16 Yv�a�!1fC'�yI.P�Sk+i's,Lrt�I,.,Br1�' '_' ...___.:.. .-,'S,r. �......: ..... .:... ..,,..•�.!.Eu. ..?.r!.'... °5.., ,...,. .. ....0 . ...3 ..,, .,......-: __:�.i.... .. ... '.. Headway Factor 1,00 100 1.00 1,0D 100 1.00. ct i rN�u#m'.bjje�'.r of Detectors. 0 0 1 0 1 1 k, ...v .}...__....,... uAu1,F.e „ a'Y•1-nr,-..rm,-w,..i.,. _r).,...r..J,-r..- Leading Detector(ft) 0 0 50 0 50 50 Detector 1 �Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 9 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex a+Ex I+Ex CREX Detector 1 Extend(s) 0 0 0.0 0,0 0:0 0 0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay(s) 01} 0.0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 {P�otected gPhases 2 3 1 6 3 ��fF►1�t1�1 f,I?�1��, ! r �i c 'a i, ..�.4i�� �,w:..��r i '1.�.i s�a,..;.'r..;�m r i t�. �.... rr�„ .. ...._.�.._ V:.�-r ...:� .-,...... ,... .. Detector Phase 2 3 1 6 3 3 Minimum Inifiais ...._.: ...:5.0 O 3.0 4.0 3.0 30 3.0 14001622AAMEX Synchro 8 Report Page 3 YEAR 2014 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES WEEKDAY PEAK AM HIGHWAY HOUR 2: INTERNATIONAL DRIVE & KING STREET Q20A2, 4/8/2015 Total Split(s) 46.0 25.0 14,0 60,11 25.0 25.0 Tatai 5pht. °lo}. :.:...•..54. 9� Maximum Green(s} 40.0 20.0 8.0 54.0 20.0 25.0 xellav�'Tu��e�s�:'.. ,, .. :��0.....-.�0 -......:�0-. .. .`-{t.. ._.._; 0.-.... ...�.�-. `: ..... . ..... ..•'.. .. ...:.: . .... .. .. .. . :;� All Red Times1 10 1.0 10 1 0 10 1 0 Lost 7tretd1,sts} � . ., ' . .....,fi ...-.. _; ' r . .:. . :.. Total I ostTime(s) 5.0 •4,0 6.0 5,0 4.0 4.0 pg... Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes 1 0 .... Recall Mode Mox lone None Max None NGno Air Actuated gIC:Ratlo 0.70 C.7$ 0.83 0.86 6.10 0.10 0. control Delay 10.0 2.3 2.7 3A 29,0 16.9 JJTotal.Delay 10.0 2,21 2.7 ... . 3.4 29y11- 16.9 A ar �..�+h;ti"4!,.�:' ° ' _r. -�. .... ..... ... .... .. �S Approach Delay 04 3 3 18.6 Queue Length 50th(ft) 168 4 9 80 1 0 que�e,Lengh95t .Lft} X96 .. . :1' 203 -. .._.._. .- .. ... :. Internal Link Dist{ft) 1859 2569 1444 T. i3aae Capacity�vph} 1262 138C 5.93 156414{ 521 456 l�rR�j����p�R����-.::;:rr. -.:.��. .,..�.r ..gyro. F .¢.;-,�".' �=.'-..�...e...�..'. � exl '.: � ,.. r i.r, �r •... _ . Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 ge, aIn..r• : , . :._,,0 ,....h.. :ars t i _r'r r r.4u .:.:;:,0� .,.. .Fit•.- .,_.. .., . ,..:.. Radueed vic Ratio 0,54 0,.04 0.21 0.46 0.40 0,03 r Area Type Other Cyefl ;Length,B5 Actuated Cycle Length.,68,7 On -. Control Type:Semi Act-Uncoord � .. .. ...... . , Intersection Signal Delay 6.3 Intersection LOS A N I��#`�����Capac��y�C1,tlb��ti�5 ���r `�_.._-,.��_' :=W tC�•Lem}�f��r1�.A: .. ... . ... .. .... � -... '. .. ..� _... . Analysis-Period(m1n)15 Splits and Phases! 2: INTERNATIONAL DRIVE.&KING STREET(120A SP12 f:.v3 nor 14001622A AMEX Synchro 8 Report Page 4 YEAR 2014 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES WEEKDAY PEAK PM HIGHWAY HOUR 1: ANDERSON HILL ROAD & KING STREET Q2E 418015 Lane Configurations t t ` Uallie, (ugh} ..;, ': .. . 47t.. ..., 1 . .....' 8 ......; .. : 4J7. Ideal Flow(vphpl) 19N 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 tg aQb;E engtL ltl. 5Uff 250.. .... Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 iepet,Let}gth(fit) .. .. Lane UtiL f=actor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fid-B�k . tor. (1 . . . ..' FrtFltko 0:850 D.85{} a. o . . . Satd�Flow(prot) 1719 1810 1810 1538 1719 153E BIt Prrttitted .,. :;. .. .I}3t30 90 Said,Flaw(perm) 5445 1 B10 1890 1538 1676 1464 4! ?i'fiaors teed Said Flaw(RTOR) ZVE Link Distance(ft) 1256 26.49. 2715 ConA Peds,(#/hr) 10 10 10 10 *"! Hair i"actora3 44 ........ ... ..t?g6 ... F`d . Heavy VoNcl�.(%) 5% 5% 5% 5% 511% 5% Shared Lane Traffic(%) Lane; taup F[tx (uph).: X28 ,.,_. .,595 _..... 92 _.:;52 . ....: ..... EnterRooked Intersection No NoN:o No No No Lane Ail"n'rrita! LEft „ Leit Lift , Rt9(tt fk Rig it -:M. _. Median.lNidth(ft) 12 12 12 _.. .. Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two ra}�l a t utp La►re:..,:- ........ ... ..... . .. .... _.... .. :... Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 IM 1,00 ` Number of Detectors 1 1 1 1 1 1 Leading Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 On Detector 1 Pos4lon(Ft) 0 0 0 0 � 0 0 � 4rtox tt .. .... ., Detector 1 Type CI+Ex Ct+Ex Ci+Ex CI+Ex C1+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Extend(s) 0.0 0.0 0. 0 0.0 0,0 ().0 0410 Defector 1 Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 .0.0 0.0 hfA..._.. .NA._...A+ou= _..; t4t PIftt... „1 Protected Phases 1 6 2 2 4 4 3 Detector Phase 1 6. 2 24 4 4 Minimum InItal(s) 4.0 4.0 4,0 4.0 4.0 4.0 14001622A,_PMEX Synchs 8 Report Pagel YEAR 2014 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES WEEKDAY PEAK PM HIGHWAY HOUR 1: ANDERSON HILL ROAD & KING STREET 120A 4/8/2015 rvIln[mm ? Total Split(s) 15.0 75.0 80,0 25,0 25 0 20,0 Maximum Green(s) 10.0 70,0 56,0 20.0 20.0 18.0 .42 All Red Time(s) 1.0 1.0 1,0 1:0 to 0,0 Lo%st TimeAjust(s) 1::E1. ... .: Total Lost Time(s) 4.0 4,0 4,0 4.0 4.o LeadlLsgk in, Lati ... . . g... Lag ....:1 -..._..l;a . Lead Lag Opftfze? Yes Yes Yes rYes Y136 RecaIl.M�de None Max Max Norte Nbne None Flash Dort Walk(s) 110 ecesErran Calls-(#Ihr): :.. . Act Effct Green(s) 71 A 711 58.3 81.3 18.9 . 18.9 tuat .41. glCk2atio tr.73 D73 X59 ; ,4&3. 0':I9, n;19 v1c Ratio O. fi 0.37 0:55 0.07 Q.25 0.73 � 2.7. ... _;:.... .... Queue Delay D.0 D-0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 TatelBelay7 LOS A A 5 A D D fn ,tai.,• ..-_.,. ..,. �.47'�..-...�_..: ....__.:... ,. Approach LESS A B D Queue Len .�. . ..: . ...... .......:. ... ... .� ::�.�., . ,R 4?I•� „�=��'1... ... '. . ..., ..,,.... ..-. ..._. :. . QueueLength95th(ft) 4.0 158 334 16 88 #203 41 t4 ta47tc.U> t.(1) .. 1:1:7$ Turn Bay Length(ft) 75 200 250 es ,e . . . .. .... 27 . 1.D77 1307. ..'.. ,3i�8. ... 3.-. . :: . . Starvation {lCap Reductnr 0 0 0 /Q�6 0y) .0 Y ..+, - Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 E44L- f Cycle Length 120 6 ? .. ylcl Lena 98 Natural Cycle 80 dntrof:Tt+pe Aetttafed,= inrdlrld . Maximum We Ratio 0.73 knort Sdgnal Clay. $ Tne [9 "�.,. .. ;..... Intersection Capacity utilization 512% ICU Level of Service A # 95:thercentile volume exceeds capacity, E p [ty,queue may he longer tft6 and Phases: 1:ANDERSON HILL ROAD&KING STREET(IlLOA 1 s2 3 04 ;,nom".., .' S4C YEAR 2014 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES WEEKDAY PEAK PM HIGHWAY HOUR 2: INTERNATIONAL,DRIVE & KING STREET f120A 41812015 Lane Gantigurafyons r ::57 .. ... : 9 :5fd. Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 190D 1900 1@00 f� g ,a }. .... : . ., aha, ....... a n Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 Tapir.L llgNoy"',r. . ...: . .... 'I . .... _ Lane LIM.Factor 1.00 1.D0 1:00 1.00 1.00 1:00 ie'¢ lkeacfaj. : ... _.. II. .... Frt 11:850 0.85D 4:'d Satd.Flow(prot) 1810 1538 1719 1810 1719 1538 (±If f'ermtt€ed0 329 D - Satd.Flog(parm) 181{} 1497 594 1810 1684 1477 �gflt.Turn ort iAd. . .. . ':;3�s. . :. .... Yds Satd Flow(RTOR) 175 Link Distance(ff) 1949 2649 1520 TravellimM i ............ . �... __..: Confl Peds (#/h10 10 10 10 _E)E3 . . :{3:84 . Heavy Vehicles(°lo) 5°/v 5% 51k 5% 5% $°/a Shard Lane Traffic(°�) (.ar1e.;�C4113s Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No Na LaC±e�Rflgnnne�31 '. 1. : 1 Ltk Lift refitlght ; Median Ndth(ft) 12 12 12 t ..... ... .. . .. ': . , CCrosswalk�Wldt*h+(ff) 1�n 'T, 1vR �'! Vrr Gill IS. Iry f _ 1 ' t Headway Factor 1.00 1.0D 1.00 1.00 100 1,00 t Number of Detectors 0 0 1 0 1 1 Denaty�1�rnpl' e. .. :: ... .. ..: ..... ... _._... . ! Leading Detector(fl) D 0� 50 0 50 50 Detector 1 PoMion(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex C1+Ex GI+Ex CI+Ex Dim 1I Detector 1 Extend(s) 0,0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 00"A ._. ..._.... .... . . 00 00 00 0.D Q0 00 Detector 1 Delay(s) 1A:..Phq+r,.pmt TuRe_....., pt .. 1V .... 'ArAt;... ,,Plena. . Protected Phases 2 3 1 6 3 Mot Perrrilitd phases.. .. 2.... ..: . 8 ... ' . Detector Phase 2 3 1 6 3 3 tilAkp ha�8.::... _..::. ... :... . Minimum Initial(s) 5.0 3.0 4.0 3,0 3.0 3.0 14001622A_PMEX Synchru 8 Report Page 3 YEAR 2014 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES WEEKDAY PEAK PM HIGHWAY HOUR 2: INTERNATIONAL DRIVE & KI'N'G STREET( 418e2015 In Mill C dEh Total Split(s) 46.0 25 0 14.0 60D 25.0 25,0 Total [it.° ........:- .. 4 °k '2"0". Maximum Green{s) 40.0. 2U.0 8.0 54 0 20.0 20}.0{ .oil ow Timer Ail-Rad Time(s) 1.0 1.0 110 1.0 1.0 1,D L�s�TieAd�ust(s) .-.T`.0 ��'l�Q , �-�l.a -�4 .:fi.0 •=1,0. � . . Tobl Lost Time(s) 5.D 4.0 5.0 5,9 4.0 4.0 Lag . :(: . head . Leah-Lag Optimi227 'fes Yes eticiE�lteslan(s� 12 3.0 ..:.•,: ., 4. .. .. r. . Recall Mode Max None None Max one None N � Aetu?ted gtC Ratio 0.72 0.86 0.75 0.75 0.13 013 ftatfs (11�.. .I} Std... .Q ...... .. .. Control Delay .7:5 1.2 3.0: 5 8 332. 10.7 Total Delay 7.5 12 10 5,6 33.2 10.7 LASA :.. A.. ... . ':; ...:.1? �.... 4 .: .. ... Apraach Belay 7.5 5.5 17-:6 : Queue Length 50th(ft) 83 0 4 D3 32 0 . ....:::.. Internal Link Dist(ft) 1869 25.60 1440 .;..2 ..vgr . . Base C�{apacity(vph) 1296 1396 581- 9351}2.3 ...490.. 546 'r.� 11 �:' �.�t.......... .. .I...1-IZ-F I �... .,;1 ! ....:: ...... ,... . ...... Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 rageF Cap:R®dilnl1.. . ..: ? Reduced vfe Ratio 0.48 H1 0.,02 0;50 0.16 0;32 Area Type, Other Actuated Cycle Length 733F. - Control Type Sorni Act Unceord Flnytstsection TSignal �Delay:-82. Intersection LOS�jA (ntersectiar�\i�AG li�{,��jll�tr�_�'-��.{�1. ..�'' nK ..,.°;,j' _.....:._}� �e�I�� 1 V1�'�'�,r, _ ..... • ,... .. . ......_..� . ...... . .. Analysis Period(min) 15 pllts and Phases: 2: INTERNATIONAL DRIVE&KING.STREET 120 'S1 3� f 03 G a: 14001a22A„PMEX Synchro 8 Report Page 4 YEAR 2019 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES WEEKDAY PERK AM HIGHWAY HOUR 1: ANDERSON HILL ROAD & KING STREET 120A) 402015 11 1!gl 11 IBM Lane Configurations ^ ed 4n; :......'... X6311 .`._t4 ... . _' Neal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 6. Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 Lane UVL Factor 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 Btke Factor.: ....: :. .l}88 ..... .... . :; Frt 0.850 0.S5D FIS Protected ... 0,950 Q g50 . Satd.Flow(prat) 1715 1810 1610 1538 1719 1538 Said Flow(perm) 394 1810 1810 1538 1682 1464 14 Sattl Flaw{R t0s ) Lrnk Speed{mpt4:)... -. .. 3 ... . . ....: Link Distance(ft) 1268 2649 2715 4 " t7 ;Af. Cc*Pads.(#lhr) 10 10 10 10 E'94. ...t} .. p .. . ..... .:. 4 .. .: 9 ......: ...... .. Heavy Vehicles °�) 6% 5% 5°f¢ FA t�5% 5% ASj:�3 FQ[ Shared Lane Traffic(°ID) .....yds 5E-4 Enter Blacked Irrtersoction No No No No No No Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 .::...D . Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Iwo,way Lek:l Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ;. 9..: ... is 4, pe K. 'np ) . :� . .-.. :..; ...� ...- ;. Number of Detectors A0ctar 7 eR�P1.� `. !..._ ._ Leading Detector(#t) 50 50 50 50 50 50 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 i E 1rze( ? x..... ...: ..-_. .- Detector 1 Type CI+Ex Ut Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+•Ex CI+Ex Ni Detector 1 Extend(s) .0.0 0.0 0,0 U 0.0 0.0 Olt ;; {�..... t1,Q 0... Detector 1 Delay(s) Q.Q 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 Pt+off. _frpt . .p _ ....... . Protected Phases 1 6 2 24 4 3 P4n`Td Phased 6 Detector Phase 1 6 .2 24 4 4 ith:Pto. Minimum Initial(s) 4.0 4;0 4,0 "4.0 4.0 4.0 14001622A..RMNB Synchro 8 Report Page 1 YEAR 2019 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES WEEKDAY PEAK AM HIGHWAY HOUR 1: ANDERSON HILL ROAD & KING STREET (120A, 4/812015 *� t Total Split(s) 15,0 75 0 .a 60,0 25.D 25.0 20,0 Maximum Green(s) 10.0 70.0 55.0 20,0 20,0 18.0.. : . .,. All-Red Time(s) 1,0 1.0 1.0 1,0 1.0 0.0 �k 0 10 .} Total Lost Time(s} 4.D 4.0 4.0 4,0 4 0 Lea�Lag Lead tag a9. Lag. : did r Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes yh�Qhxenstan(S}.:: 3.0 3 4 , : .3 0. .. 3 0 3 p 3Q Recall Mode None Max Max None NDne None Flash Dont Walk(s) 114 01, Act Eifct Green(s) 71.1 71,1 501 771 17,D 17,0 Wo Ratio 0,163 HO 0.68 016 0.66 0,50--_ OAW (queue Delay 0.0 6 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Tn[a1 Eelay 11 7 h ?... . 4?. 46 ......:: ...... ... ... . . LOS B B B A D - D 2. . 6 9....... ..... .. .: . .... . Approach LOS B B D 4laeui _.,, 1 87.........` . Queue Length 95th(ft) 87 664 458 36 189 151 trlterflalL€nfcRltft}; `�1 �� X569 h�. ..Z . .. Turn Say Leirig1 (ft) 75 200 250 Starvation Cap Reduotn 0 0 0 0 0 0 p 111 jadkaeduefr[ � ' 0 Storage Cap Raductn D 0 0 0 0 0 48 ;$Q. .... fab , 1,t5 5$ , :4 CycleLenglh 120 Natural Cycle DD Maximum 0c Ratio 0,80 Intersection Capacity 1,blizabon 70,610 ICU Levet of Service C ,4nalyrus S lits and Phases: 1:ANDERSON HILL ROAD&KING STREET 120 Page 2 YEAR 2019 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES WEEKDAY PEAK AM HIGHWAY HOUR 2: INTERNATIONAL DRIVE & KING STREET 120A, 418/2015 Jr, "K, . Lane Configuratrars + ' : lmavAh) 7 1ST 5 7 Idem Flour(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1.900 1900 19Ot7 storage tngtli,:O :'_ ... .... ...... 35. €. .. ..' 5E} . {3. .. ::,.... Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 . �:.. ...:�5.. ,::,... . .. .fib . .: . ..... .�.. ... .. .; ;. Lane Util.Factor 1,0D 1.00 1,00 1.00 1,p0 1.00 Pg .Bike Fackcir, 0;37 - F rt 0.850 0.85.0 t 90 Wd.Flow(prot) 1810 1538 1719 11510 1719 1538 fit �.. .....:3 _..., � Said.Flow(perm) 1810 1497 2F0 1810 1684 1477 Flhfutpn Rid i:,?........::.... .. Yss. Said,Flow(RTOR) 69 kik� d*.fi,) Little Distance(ft) 1,949 2649 1520 Trava1i.Tj (s) 38 4 516 34,6 Confl.beds:[#Ihr) 10 10 10 10 PeiH Or. Heavy Vahicies(°f°) 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% Shared Lane Traffic(° ) _. :.Wo _ Enter Blocked intersection No Na No No No No RgT�tIT.,m.. .�.... i........ x Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 link safl L,:. .... s� .-.... ,0 . Cro:sswalkWidth(ft) 96 16 16 fwo way Left C(r0 L ...f, .. Headway Factor 1.00 1,00 1.00 1,00 1 R 1.00 r?rr11p8 Spa�d00). :........... Number of Detectors 0 0 1 0 1 1 Leading Detector(fk} 0 0 50 0 50 50 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector I Typo CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Fx OI+Ex Detector 1 Extend(s) 0,01 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 G.0 Dettsp cues)... .,. o Detectar 1 Dalay(s) fl 0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0 0i3O ............ p pm�pt f rt . J?e . Protected Phases 2 3 1 6 3 Pe ittecf Plias -.�.. .... Detector S 3........,: .. . r ._.,... �D++(etlectorHPhase 2 3 1 6 3 3 _ OHMis ..,.� .- _.,.... ....�.... .:., ._sem .._.. Ivlinlmurn Ini"I(s) 5.0 3,0. 4.0 3.0 30 3,0 14D01622A.,,AMN8 Synchro 8 Report Page 3 YEAR 2019 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES WEEKDAY PEAK AM HIGHWAY HOUR 2. INTERNATIONAL DRIVE & KING STREET 120A 418,12015 Mlntt urrt pi►t s:a . 111 .. . ;9 4.... . .1 .:••.1 . ..... . Total Split(s) 46.0 25.0 14,0 90.0 25.0 25.0 TatalSl1f Maximum Green(s} 40.0 20.0 8,0 54 a 20.0 20.0 Yellcw Times AI:i-Red Time(s) 1.0 1.D 1,0 1.0 1 D 1,0 (osfi,Tlmijusl.4S�.... . l 0 4' ' t3 .... . Total Lost Time(s 5 0 4,0 0 5.0 4,0 4.0 4 eadlLa .. ......� .... ::. .... . .:�� . ....... .. �---Lead. Lead Lag Qpt�mize7 Yes Yes Recall Mode Max None alone Max None None , I=tfifiree .(S ... 4.1 55�@ Actuated g/C RaZ 0,57 0.69 176 0.76 0.11 011 Control Delay 21.1 3.3 1831 53 30.5 12.4 Total Delay 211 3.3 1831 5.8 30.0 12.4 Approach Delay 17.6 74.2 17.5 Queue L=ength 60th.(ft) 2a 21 215 107 11 0 suiue.;k ength, 51 (ftp. ,;. + 3 Internal Link Rist(ft) 15.69 2569 1440 325• .454. :...,. ` 5�r . : .. ... : ..... . Tum�'�y,LerlgtM Base Capacity(vph) 1032 1324 381 1385 502 484 Spiliback Cap ReduOn 4 n 0 0 a a WR ARQ. Radluced vfc:Ratio 0:141 0.16 1.33 0,58 0.05: D.14 Aregya Type Other Y )e:or, t]'1a; 1-i,��... Actuated Cycle Length 71 9 Control Type Sem Act.Uncoord {vp��171�F1tTi Y�Cr�&1111 'I,:�� .. .. .. ...:. ..... ..:. � .� �'�: .. . .... .. . :.;; � .': :• - ._ Intersection Signal Delay 47.7 Interseclion LOS D Itprsectiot�. tt!`Wfzapnn:$Q.Q%' .. `. -. ...: fCILevlofe0lfl . _.. .. . Analysis Period(min)15 Veumaxed cap� ,i �„gtteu i ritlorehrall infinite Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. ...95tkt pltirrtttrr�udtt ? ..� Pf R 'uiryf .longer Queue shown is maxirn:um after two cycles. lits and Phases: 2: INTERNATIONAL DRIVE&KING STREET(12DA) YEAR 2019 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES WEEKDAY PEAK PM HIGHWAY HOUR 1, ANDERSON HILI_. ROAD & KING STREET 120A) 41812015 Lane Carrfigurations 1'53. :580 . . .829. X44 _ 57 05.' : Ideal Flow(vphpi) 1900 1900 1900 1906 1900 1900 5tarag Let�gth;(f!}. �.: . .:. .X5.4 . .... 0 - Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 5< _......._ ,....... .,... Lane Util.. Factor 1.40 1.00 1.00 1:00 1.00 1.00 � 8 Frt 0:85 0.850 Fit Pro#epted ad `..:.;; {?, 50.... . -. : Satd.Flaw(Prot) 1719 1810 1810 1538 1719 1538 Petnxltte .... t0 ' �. t90• . ... Said Flow(perm) 215 1810 1810 1538 1679 1464 F i6llf Tum on R64 .. .. .. . . .. :Np ....... ... „ Ja S,atd.Flow(RTOR) Link Distance(ft) 12x56 26749 2715 : CEA Trauefine.($F51., ..... e. Z4 ... ?.3 ... .•.. . .. .. : ......•, Confl,Peds (#Jhr) 10 10 10 10 HeavyViihrclea>°k) 5% 9% 5% 5% 5% 5% O4 Shared Lane Traffic{%p) t ane;Group FPl. . Enter Blocked Intersectioa No No No No No No t� "rif :Lett. ae . ....4e4.. Rrgh1 ...._.a:eft .... tht... .._;'_.... . . . - Median Width(#t). 12 12 12 Crossmalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 4 . . . . Headway Facttorrgn y 100 1.00 1.00 1100 1.00 .1m % �.4...:,. Numberof Datecllmail 1 1 1 1 1 1 Get (4 r TeTrtpfaf . • ... .. . Laatlsng i7electvr(Ft) 50 50 `50 50 50 50 Dateetor 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex .... _.. Detegtor 1 Extend.(6) 0.0 0 0 Q.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 Detector 1 Delay(s) 0,0 0:0 OA 0.0 0.0 0.0 Tum Type... prrt: pt N� Protected Phases 1 6 2 24 4 3 Detector Phase 1 6 2 24 4 4 Minimum Initlal(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 14001622A,,PMNB Synchro 8 Report Page 1 YEAR 2019 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES WEEKDAY PEAK PM HIGHWAY HOUR 1; ANDERSON HILL ROAD & KING STREET 120A1 4/8/2015 Mlnlrpurtpltt{ ... ' s_...::_ . . ., ..... . o ... ...` .. ... . . Total Split(s) 15.0 75.Q 60.0 25.0 25.0 20.0 ,, .. . .. �..; Maximum Green(s) 10.0 70.0 55.0 20.0 20.0 18,0 Ya "',,710 1s)I; 0 4 D . , '4 0 4 Q All-Red Time(s} 10 I'D 1,0 1,0 I'D 0,Q L=ost Tune Adjusts) . .. .. Total Last Time(s) 4,0 4.0 4 0 4,0 410 k. . .... �A...,.. �. ad Lead Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode Nano Max Max None None None .... :. Flash QontWalk(s) 11.0 ' Ian OWN (# hr� . . '- .. Act I Ifct Green(a) 71.0 71,0 562 81.9 210 21.0 Attatl g/CaU . . ff :02fi .. ..; v/c Ratio 0,52 0,47 0.84 0.42 0'.46 1,04 30 3 10;x,2..t' itl Y Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0,0 0,0 0.0 0.0 ry !!77 A " ,1 r1g1 4...... :: ....... LOS B A C A D F Approach LDS �j p AA C` l- cfJ. Queue Length 95th(it) 67 210 #710 26 156 #.689 Turn Say Length(ft) 75 200 250 Bas ,Capaci�(Yp ).. . 318 .:"l;285 1II29 a9 Asa. ... 3Q7...... Stere tion Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 A); Ca( edgcin Storage Cap Reductrn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cycle Lergth 120 1 4 i• i L fF 'W�m.. t i .mss, ....::: Natural Cycle 120 x . Maximum v{c Ratio t.,04 tOStloriigjlally. D7f ) seuanl35 G. ... Intersection Capacity Utilizatlon 703% ICU Level of Service C Aa1ysl Perldt),(trin}15:1 y ...... .. . .... ... . -_.. . Volume exoeeds capacity,queue is theoretically Infinite ... ....� # 95th percentile volume exceeds capaclty,queue may be longer. 4 i;� Quel����rvnod_m�clmplrfl.;�1'#e�titro.�ycies 1T _,..... ..':..., . . ; .... , 14001622A PMNB Synchro 8 Report Page 2 YEAR 2019 NO-BUILD TRAF'F'IC VOLUMES WEEKDAY PEAK PM HIGHWAY HOUR 1: ANDERSON HILL ROAD & KING STREET Q2PA 418/2015 Splits and Phases: 1:ANDERSON HILL ROAD&KING STREET(120;0 x 14001822A PMNB Synchra8Report Page 3 YEAR 2019 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES WEEKDAY PEAK PM HIGHWAY HOUR 2: INTERNATIONAL DRIVE & KING STREET 120A) 418/2015 Lane Configurations 3 33� :> Ideai Flow(vphpl) 1000 1904 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 Lane Utll.Factpr 1.00 1,001,00 1,00 1.0.0 1.00 Pfd BikB Fac#c, . .%Joi ....1:.E10 . Oew.,..,:4 Frt 0.550 0.850 F,It Pratscted. . O,J50 Cl: . . . ... .. . ' ...: Satd.Flow(prat) '1510 1538 1.719 1810 1719 1538 PiiSatd.:Flow(perm) 1810 1497 377 1810 1684 1477 Fd��it:��rrn `3atd,Flow(RTDR) 310 Link Distance(ft) 1949 8A9 1520 Travel )me(s) 3$.0. .;.: , . . . Cont Peds.(*hr) 10 10 10 90 Peek.Hurl actor 0`:84 fl84 fl84.,. i) . . . . . ©8A, Heavy Vehictes (%) 5% 5114 5% 6'/a 6a°!a 5% Shared Lane Traffic(%) Lanetou +t+l.(`�Pk..;:, X43 `.-..... Enter Blocked Intersection No No. No No NO No "'D Median tf.. Ir rCQf . Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 T�ua way Left Tart L Headway Factor 1 00 1 00 1 DO 1 00 T QO 100 Z. ..... t�.......' ;, Number of Detectors 0 .0 1 0 1 1 Dutb`f TerOpjala r.:; . .. Leading Detectnr(ft) 0 0 50 0 50 50 Trailt Iefe>ipt �:.D..1. . - fl Q _.; B' -... .. . . ........... Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 ' 0 r .. Detector 1 Tym GI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex U+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex 1hI detector 1 Extend(s) 0..0 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 070 e etor 7 c�ue8 f ). 0 ..... Detector 1 Delay(s) 0'.0 0'0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 :pry+pt. ......1A Protected Phases 2 3 1 3 Detector Phase 2 3 1 6 3 3 _....; Minimum Initial(a) 5:0 3.0 4,0 3.0 3.0 10 14001622A,,PMNB Synchro 8 Report Page 4 YEAR 2019 NO-BUILD TRAF'F'IC VOLUMES WEEKDAY PEAK PM HIGHWAY HOUR 2-. INTERNATIONAL DRIVE & KING STREET 120A 4/8/2015 ., Total Split(s) 46.0 25.0 14.0 60.0 25,G 25,0 Totat.Spllt fel. '. .. . 5. ag, ? ..1 :5°k 7 ° ., 3 ' ..2.ct4° ;.• Maximum Green(s) 40.0 20,0 6.0 54.4 20.0 N . 2D,.O.. e�lol Time( ) 5t3 4. r4 All-Red Time(s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1,0 1.0 hostlirte Adlus#(s :: 1;fl 0 a 4 Total Lost Time(s) 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 4,0 4.0 Lead Lead-Lag t0 t�mize7 yes Yes P �e��&�l �xier�5tonr{9�. ,.. � :.Y� .�3a� .....:�ri! .. ..:v�_.... ,:.J ti .-_�s� .. .•, _- . ..::: ..,:� ;. _ Rscall Made Max None None Max Mone Ron ' Actuated g!C Natio 0.55 0 77 0 68 0 68 4 21 P 21 4.25 0.86 07 ... ... control Delay K8 21 6.9 11.6 35.3 Z73 Total Delay 20.8 2.1 6.9 1:1 6 36,3 27.3 .. ...... .' .. Approach Delay 19.7 11 1 29.7 Queue Length 50th(ft) 283 4 15 230 92 78 tueue�.eng�h��th��.._. . :..'a�Q.. • . ,:�� .. :�?�• ':.,.:.���� ,• fish .... ;.�; ...... .. . . . In,ternal:Link Dist(ft) 1869 2589 1440 .: : . ;. Base Capacity(vph) 1.000 1217 4D7. 1234 447 613 tNNon Cep Reduem.: .., 4 f) . ...;:.0. - 0 ...... Spi back Cap Reductn 4 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced vlc Ratio 0.70 0.04 0,74 0.66 0.45 0,77 :Brea Type: Other 11 t Actuated Cycle Length 80 9 Control Type Semi Act Un000rd :. Intersection Signal Delay.l9 2 Irrterseatlon LOS:B Ipielsgtl Opacity EJtt3iation6d.'Q°(° ICLt Levet aF 5ervre_C... . Analysis Period(min)15 lits and Phases: 2: INTERNATIONAL DRIVE&KING STREET 12. (53 x 02 ♦ � '• `�� Y.'Y �;,+Sr�.r� X� "moi#' �.Y�:-.'�. 1400i622A_,PMNB Synchro8 Report Page 5 YEAR 2419 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES - APPROVED AM 1: ANDERSON HILL ROAD & KING STREET 120A 418/2015 11111111111111mal IN OWN slim' Lane Configurations ' t V�rlpme,(vplt).. 263. .. 11:68 .....698 .....( 3 2:14 .. d.... Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1600 1900 1900 190D 1900 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 Lane US.Factor 1130 1.00 1.00 1.(t0 1.00 1.00 .... ...._. . . . . Frt D.s'SD 0.850 . (,9� , ,... :�: ..... :....... ..... Sa+�t❑❑d.:Flow{ (prot) 11.719 181 CL 1810 1.538 1�7y1�D 1538 Satd.Flow(perm) 358 1810 1810 16.38 1682 1464 R1ghtTum on°Rrrd n . Flo. Said. Flow(RTOR) 35... . .::. . ...... ;�0 Link$peeo Link Distance(ft) 1256 2649 2715 Confl Reds (#!hr) 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles(yo) 5% 5% 6% 5°k 5°r6 6% NJ Shared Lane Traffic(�u) Liri pinup Eloiu.vR ) 2�0. -3243 X43 ";.228 Enter Blacked Intersection No No No No No No L n�Alignment' Left :L #t Letfi . t �gE}t . ;, R1ght..... . . Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 me ' ... . . .. ..... . . .... -_ ... ...... .._ Crosswalk Wdih(ft) 16 16 16 T voa LBf�Taft L'atie ... Headway factor 100 1.00 1.00 1 0y0y 11.2�yy 100 Fit., - Numberof Detectors 1 ! 1 1 1 1 DeQ) emplt �` r i Leading Detector(ft) 50 50 5D 50 50 50 7rallln ttecfpt Detector 1 Position(fi). 0 0 0 0 0 0 5Q.... :. ........ Detector 1 Type C1+Ex Cl+l=x CI+Ex Ct+Ex CI+ x CI+Ex Detoot.ar 1 Extend(a) 0.0. fl 0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0,0 Detector 1 Relay(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0-0 TRtn TYPB. ... 'pmpt_.. .:.;:I;f�. �...NA ....R A. re I ....': Protected Phases ti 6 2 24 4 3 Detector Phase 1 5 2 24 4 4 Minimurn Initial(S) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4,0 14001622A_AMBD_APPROVED OFFICE-280:000 S.F. Synchro B Report Page 1 YEAR 2019 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES - APPROVED AM 1.ANDERSON. HILL ROAD & KING STREET 120A 418!2015 tF . a s c� .... Total 5pllt(S) 15.0 75.0 60.4 25.0 25 0 20 0 62 5° ` �.5 °fa.... 2Q;8°fa 2Q 6 A. .. p .._) ......_ .. . _ Maxftm Green(s) 10.0 70.0 55,0 20,D 20.0 1&0 .. Yellow_7im� .. �s.. Ail-Red Time(s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 10 1 0 0 0 Last Time Adjusf',(s). Total Lost Time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0. �� . ..4�e�d...... ..' . . ..:;. �:. Lead Lag Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vet►ltdeXter?sfot(s}.. ... : :._. _...... ,., 0Wo �._..... 0..• :.:. . ...... . Recall Made None rex Max None None mane W . Ttm tsk. .:....... '. Fle5h Dant Walk{s) 110 Act Effct Green(s) 71.0 71 0 56.0 78.4. 18.4 1 S ✓��;ttl���g1C�tatro 4:73 t�....... vlc Ratto 0,68 0.94 0.71 C.17 0.71 0.5.5 poplrl;t0elay Queue belay 010 0 0 0.0 0.0 D 0 0.0 Total LOS B C C A b t7 _ . Appraamh LOS C B b 322." Z G ...._�� .. 87... .:_:. ... Queue Length 95th(ft) 107 #1053 .484 35 214 151 x 1175.. : 2569 2635 Turn Bay Length(ft) 75 200 250 ;.;..1 4 132©. 6asapac►ty;{vph}. x;279. Starvation Cap Raductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 o. . .. Storage Gap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Q 0 Rd vlo Ratio 68 0 94 ,071 l6 0 fit D 49 �m , k � Cycle Length 120 ` uatedok Natural Cycle 140 onfrgllyp ..Aefatctnc0ordmted . Maximum vlc Ratio 0,94 NOW_5 Intersection Capacity UlIftation 80.0% ICU Level of Service b Pkilsr # 95th Percentile volume exceeds ,queue.ma ca capacity, be longer.E� Y Y Querse shown is max(murn,aet.i�ra.cycfes...... .;... ....'. .. ...': ...� .... . ..: .:. . . • .' ... �: . :::. .. :.. .. ,. ;SpRs and Phases: 1:ANDERSON HILL ROAD&KING STREET(1:211A 012 04 - ;;fi -er YEAR 2019 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES -APPROVED AM 2. INTERNATIONAL DRIVE & KING STREET 120A 402015 Lane Configurations ° Ideal Flow(uphpl) 1800 1900 1900 1900 1900 1.800 :.25d... Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 Taper Lengtr€..O'` .. .. . _ .... 25.. . Lane Util.Factor 9.00 1.D0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 i . {3!g8 a 94 Frt 0,850 0360 ... 954.. Satd.Flow.(prot) 1810 1538 1719 1810 1.7 1538 FIt Pealed., Y140 {>:9 Satd.Flow(perm) 1610 1497 253 1810 1684 1477 Ri It Tum.on, ed No. Yes 9 satd, Flow(RTOR) 98 ink Seed,.(rrrpl).. 36 .. .35. 0. . ..; Link Distance(ft) 1949 2649 1520 TravefTt3tt . }._.z ..„ _:.. 38€x._ 1 .. Confi Peds (#Ihr) 10 10 103 10 x;90 . . :0 4..... . . . Heavy Vehicles(%) 10 _ .r., .�•. t,:74tai: 0 .w�..U8 _..:.. . ,4 .... .... Shared Lane Traffic(%) Ladeoup, u.4yf +k.: Mal $, 80i,_.... ,4.. .... fi .. . z Enter Socked Intersection No No No No No No Lane fin`��t ._.. . :. .. ' .a1k eft, high _. Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 _..:. . ... ..... . 4. Crosswalk Width(ft) 1ti 10s 115 , ,. , �.:.z... .. Headway Factor 1 00 1 fl0 100 150 1 00 1 00 fitrn ing speed( AIf. `.'.. w.. ,�.. ( .. .. _...,.. . t :..,. ... Number of Detectors 0 0 1 0 1 1 rE'I s ... .. ...., Leading Detector(ft) 0 0 50 0 50 50 0..... ..:. Dete7raflinctor 1 P©sit'cn(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Type 01+Ex Ci+Ex Cl+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex D4etf 1 Ghatl i,,, f Detector 1 Extend(s) 0,0 10. 00 00 00 00 Qr,T� ,AMWou ��� My Deteotor 1 Delay(s) 0 0 0.0 0.9.. 0.0 0.0 0,0 M�F ­R, Protected Phases 2 3 1 H 3 PerrlitidhassIr]� , £ -s Detector Phase 2 3 1 6 3 3 yiF)Phase �. 10inimum Initial(s) 5.0 3.0 4.0 3.0 3,0 3.0 14001622A_AMBD_APPROVED OFFICE-280,000 S.F. Synchro 8 Report Page 3 YEAR 2019 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES - APPROVED AM 2: INTERNATIONAL DRIVE & KING STREET 120A 41812015 Total Split(s) 46,0 26.0 14,0 60.0 . 25.0 25,0 ot.° 29 °la 1F,5'a 7t1.°I� 29 4>to _29:4°fe... Maximum Green(s) 49.0 20,0 8.0 54.0 20.9 2a.0 All Red Time(s) 10 1 0 10 1.0 1.0 1.0 t�sK Tnreidtusfi(s) Total Lust Time:(s) 5.0 4,0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4,0 Lead1 9 . a .....:. ...... .. . ._� .... . ..;; .........- .... .. ..._. . .....:� ....,. . :... . . . :, . ....: .._...._ .- .... ..a :, , LeadLag Optlmize? Yes Yes A. Racall Mode Mex Nor:e None Mx Nana lone 6. Actuated 91C Ratio 0.56 0,70 0.76 0.76 012 0.12 yt,R F3a#ia . Control Delay 22,1 3.7 433.2 6 2 31..0 11.5 Total Delay 221 3.7 433.2 6.2 31.0 11.5 LisA ............ ... :' Approach Delay 17.3 2061 17,0 Queue Length 50th(ft) 274 31 420 112 15 0 ..- ...-. + �{e�re;l4ngfhtEa..{ Internal.Lin kDist(ft) 1869 2569 1440 nnnnn ... . ._. . ...._ .... ... . Base Capacity(vph) 1023 1312 373 1372 498 497 Spillback Cap Raductn 0 0 0 © 0 0 N.-.:..0 Redus.ed Wa Ratio 0.82 0,23 1.90 0.59 0,08 0.20 MW Area.Type: Other _ _.._�._.... Actuated Cycle Length 72.3 N4`�Ota1 C`�.,le�1OQ ` . _ ..._ .. ... . -.... . ...... .... .. .. .... . -.. Control Type:{/Seymi AcJ[tt{J�ncioord ly[e'x3i ugt Y 1u9 411 � R Intersection y Signal Dela 1196 Intersection LOS F �F ,gyp .... ..... I;Olt��cxt. a�acl Analysis Period(mlh);15 Queue shown is maximum after two Cycles ..95ttr percenUl VtGm exrrapacity,.queuemay f3 `longer :' Clueue shown is maximum after two cycles. Spltts:and Phases: 2; INTERNATIONAL DRIVE&KING STREET(120A) 03 -'.-f V.d.4 �R� � Z' '-t,'�[ �h 'e,,:, •. .-"r,`•�ku1:.Vib:>;�5!u.'wxt..�n °�...'. YEAR 2010 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES - APPROVED PM 1: ANDERSON HILL ROAD & KING STREET 120A 4/812015 12 Lane Configurations t t X )....: _......r. ..... 1 . .. ass .. .. :..�.... ..: s2 : . . ... Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1930 �orag LPrtgth: � t}0 r..... 0 if _.._...::.. :.... . . Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 Lane tatil.Factor 1.00 1.00 100 1.60 1M 1.00 f�l?d Bike€actor:' . :...: 1:06 .. , 8 :x.95. . ..ti ..... . Frf D;8.51J O.B50 . Satd,Flow(prot) 1710 1810 1810 1538 1719 1538 I t"",Ie61,itfed Said,Flow(parm) 119 1810 1610 1538 1681 1464 Turn an' isd I4 Satd Flow(RTOR) Hi Link Distance.(ft) 1256 2649 2715 CQRfi.Peds.(0)hr) 10 10 10 10 Heavy Vehicles(°1°) 5°7a 5% 60% 5% 5% 5°1° . 31Yr,s. . , ... ...... z.,..r..... Shared Lane Traffic Lane f up 9iow vpkl)...:' . 68a ... . . ...r_.: . .. . 1 �_.....:: Enter Blacked Intersection N(3 No No No. No No � W.. ..,,.t.�ft Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 pry Crosswalk Width(#) 16 16 16 Twc7 Wr LfC Tlirtt Lane , Headway Factor 1.00 .1.00 1.00 1,00 1 M 1,00 TurOing Speed�m��)... .: ......=45:_........... :''13 .:'�5._,. rg`..... ......... ' . . ,...., ..... . .... .. .,. , ((lumber of Detectors 1 1 1 1 1 t letpirremplat Leading Detector(ft) 0 50 50 50 60 50 re Defector 1 Positi*ft) 0: 0 O {y. 0 0 0 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex Ci}Ex C1+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex A. D,1t 1 Cttanpe.. .. . Detector 1 Exter;d(s) 0 0 C.0 0.0 0 0 0,0 0.0 ;4 . .. � . oe'�e�t�r 1 Queue.{s). .=�Q..... :Q_t#. ... . "170 0 9.. ... :.. . .. .. . . Detector 1 Delay(s) 0.0 0:0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 Turn.Type ..:.: i *.p.. . A, - . ► ,..ptov, .,:Prat... . m .._'....._. . Proteefed Phases 1 6 2 24 4 3 Debtor Phase 16 2 2 4 4 4 wttp t'hase... Minimum Initial(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4,0 4.0 14001622A_PMBD_APPROVED OFFICE-280,OOC S.F, Synchro 8 Report Page t YEAR 2019 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES - APPROVED PM 1: ANDERSON HILL ROAD & KING STREET 120j 4!8!2015 Total Split(s) 15:0 75.0 60,0 25,0 25.0 20,0 TOt .2Q.... .... 4 Maximum Green(s) 1 Q U 70,0 55,0 20 20.0 1.8.0 AIJ Red Time(s) 1(1 0 1.0 1.D fi C 0.0 Totat Last Time(e) 4.0 4,0 4,0 4.D 4 0 zeadllag Lead... . :: ... . . ..Lg I»a9..... ...L9 eat. Lead Lag{Optimize? Yes Yea Yes Yes Yes ' .....:: ..... .:: ... `.. Recall Mode None €fax Max None Alone Nane Flash Dont Walls(a) 11,0 D Act Effct Careen(s) 710 710 56,9 810 21.0 21 0 ��.�... ....... ... ...... . •. __ ..., We Ratio 0.65 0.50 1.00 0.1.4 0.47 1.04 Queue Delay 0;0 a.s D.0 o s O.L. D o Total Onlay ... . ; 9 J =81 ...-5D 6 2 .36.... 1 Of . .. LOS C A D A D F pprach_ilelap 12� Approach LCIS B D E 46 X19.:... Queue Length 96th(ft) 114 228 #937 31 160 4389 Turn Bay Length(ft) 75 200 250 D. Starvation Cap Redux 't' 0 0 D 0 0 Q SllktbakaJxituttr� :.,:," Q p, Q, Q ; Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 D 0 0 0 Area Type, . .:: .... ...' . Quer'... ..... .....�... . . . . ... ....... .. �......_. . . .-... _.. Cycle Length:1.20 AGit��:(�d Cycle'�,��ti3u.'k:�. . �:,..... •� - .. - Natural Cycie:150 ?ki 4 TYFtt ..Rc€uaed` ncvtd�nted. Maximum vlc Rata: 1.04 WAN 00 4Q 7 se`cirnI,glOtessecJJo .1�35 D.::. lntersectran Capacity Utlkzatron A.3% ICU Level of Service D Volume exceeds capacity,queue is tbaoretieally infinite. �i3uB sli'awn t��max(�unt after too cjriles . # 96th per centle volume exceeds capacity,queue may be long or.. C eue`sflo+tinis inax(mum after tW6 Cycles. 14001622A PMBD APPROVED OFFICE-280,000 B.F. Synchro 8 Report Page 2 YEAR 2019 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES -APPROVED PM 1: ANDERSON HILL ROAD & KING STREET Q20A) 41812016 SnN8 and Phases: 1:ANDERSON HILI.ROAD&KING STREET(1 0A} 1: .-ray c rS � a a uw.,�.,, E �'ak�'.. -.5,•. ,7 k''xt•�- -%':3�rM _ 06 m:.. +-.r.; 14001622A_PMBD_APPROVED OFFICE-280,000 S.F. Synchro 8 Report Page 3 YEAR 2Q19 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES - APPROVED PM 2: INTERNATIONAL DRIVE & KING STREET 120A 402015 onk Lane Configurations 'h ��� �.�_ . 1940 19 Idea _ ( p p)� 00 1900 1900 1900 1900 ie nxx . {tjr'ag 'l ength:(ftj . ...... ...' Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 Taper4ength 25 Lane.Util.Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.D0 9:0[3 1.00 Ped Bike Parlor Frt 0:850 0.850 Said.,Flcw(prat) 1810 1538 1714 1810 1719 1538 ItF�r Nifted. Satd. Flow(perm) 1810 1497 293 1840 1884 1477 o f itd Yes_ rt7um on Rel: .. Satd, Flog (RTOR) 310 Link Distance(ft) 1949 2649 1520 Travel Confl:Peds,(#Ihr) 10 10 10 10 Peak 1-[ohr Fachtr.-.. . 0:84„ f84 (}$4 Heavy Vehicles(ala) 5%y 5% q5% y51(0 5% 5%519 aiz Shared Lane Traffic La 7e roup Flov Iph .. Ok _,: . ... . Enter Blocked lrtersaction No No No No No talo LareAli ,menk.; a z ._._.. Median Wldth(ft) 12 12 12 q.... .. ... :. ... . ... .. . Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Twcrvay L1 Terri to Headway Factor 1.00 1 00 1.001 1.00 100 1.00 Turnrg.SP ;( hh. Number of Detectors 0 0 1 0 1 1 i Leading Detector(ft) 0 0 50 0 54 50 �. ROW g Detac )... Detector 1 F'osltlon(ft) D 0 0 0 0 D NO 5D . . . . 5{) 54 �t�� Detector 1 Type CI+Ex C1+Ex Cl+Ex C+Ex GI+Ex CI+Ex Crefdtsr 1 channel _. _ Detector 1 Extend(s) 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 D O D 0 0 OR, . :.. : O4t4� Detector 1 Delay(s) 0,0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 'N prVfi Protected Phases 2 3 N Pf �t "d f4 r....... Detector phase 2 3 1 6 3 3 Minimum Initial(s) 5.0 3.4 4.0 3.0 3.0 3,0 14001622A PMBID_APPROVED OFFICE-280,DDD S.F. Synchra 8 Repast Page 4 YEAR 2019 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES - APPROVED PM 2: INTERNATIONAL DRIVE & KING STREET 120A) 418/2015 Minrrtturrt 5ppltt{s . . a ,fla> 1 o s fl Total Split J(s) 46,0 25.0 14,0 Bao 25.O r 25,0 Tatai:Splet.{°l6}. � . 54�1°lu 20.4°/a.. 16;.`0!0 .. 7tl;ti{0 294fi. L9r4�10 �. ;, Maximum Green(s) 40.0 20..0 8,G .54.0 20.0 20,0 All.Red Time� 1,0 1-0 1 a 10 'l.0 10 j QstTtrrie Adjust,{s ........:. . 'fl..._ ... : . , :.0 .:... fly.... .. . ..,.4 ...... Total Lost Time(s) 5.0 4,0 6.0 6.0 4,0 4.0 hxV ead .... Lead Lag Qpllmize Yes Yes Recall Made Max done hkorte Max None tone }tit Ef(�#Creen��s). .. � .� .£�5-.. ..��.. � , •- fl.. ....��.�. ..�°�0. . �.�... : . . .. .. . : .::. . . Actuated g!G Ratio C,49 036 0:65 0.65 0.25 0.25 0:75 O;Ofi p43 4f8 ulc Ratlo Gontrol Delay 26.6 .2 2 9,9 13,6 H.1 106A Total Delay 26,6 2 2 9,9 13.5 391 106 4 :� . Approach Delay 24.6 13 0 B6.2 Queue Length 50fh(ft) 301 6 26 245 144 305 : 450...... :. .Q©. .. . :�1 . . .:,;. . , ..3�.... 1� . . .. .. . -. ......, Internal.Link Dist(ft) 1869 2569 1440 45fl. . .., ... ...:��. ...'... :...;; Base Capacity(vph) 883 1128 340 1171 424 598 RE Splllback Gap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 . Reduced WG Ratio Or70 0,06 0.42 0.69 030 1.15 Area Type Other Actuated Cycle Length 85 Al L �turakCyote $tt _.... ......... Control Type:Semi Aot-U neaord ... Intersection Signal Delay 43.0 Intersection 1.45 D Ir li,�v 1Cel at. rvera Q ,.. .it�h�c�rarrG.�;�it�t�tr�izaklolt75��°� .. .:' ... ...... ;... .. ...:,.... , Analysts Poriod(min)15 ._)i�lul't�.���e@ds, pact�Y�.�lueire ..� . ..�.:. . ... Queue shown is maximum atter tug ey016s # 95tft peresnlil 1t1 txia excwt5�a "1f, ..dl!teu, may f5e;lohger...;:, .... pac y . . Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 2:INTERNATIONAL DRIVE&KING STREET. 2 ,ds..f� ..,;s� w. tlw _,,,.. .�. :: , ,.•.Y�C.�tis... YEAR 2019 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES - PROPOSED AM 1: ANDERSON HILL ROAD & KING STREET 120A 418/2015 Lane Configurations ° t F Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1940 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 Tape/ls06.... Lane Util.Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 'do"' 1 �0. Frt 0:850 0.850 Ott Protected Satd.Flaw(Prot) 1719 1810 1810 1538 1719 1538 Satd:Fbvw(perm) 349 1610 1810 1530 1682 1464 Right hum Satd Flaw(R70R) 3Q L,InkSpud(mpt.). .. .. .: . ..; . .;;35 .....•fir... . . . . . . .: .... . .. Link Dlstance(ft} 7'255 2649 2715 Traysl.Tirrie(5) . . . Wit Peds,A/hr) 10 10 10 10 p'�als Hour Factor. .. D94. �94 Heavy�/ehicles(%) 5°/n 5°/u 5% 5% 5% 5°la Shared Lane TratFio(%) Lana,G�vu.F. )o . VR ) 28Q. ...1Q 5 , '�4 :: 9.. ... . 153 Enter jBlocked Intersectlon No Nq�oy �pNo No No No .., :- _.. -•QI� - ., Median Width(ft) 12 12 42 Crossw6lk Width(ft) 16 16 1fi 171M7�T'�SYI L •'F. Y ' ` , k t r �i i Haadway Factor 1.00 1.00 1100 1.00 .1,00 1.400 ; 6. . . .. . ...' `. .. ..: .. . .. ;....:` _..... Number of Detectors 1 1 1 1 1 1 Ttmpl _: Leading Detector(ft) 50 50 50 60 50 50 Tra.t}7etectar(ft) Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 76 Ab De tecto r 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex 09 x Cl+Ex in Detector 1 Extend(s) D.0 0.0 0,0 0 0 (}0 0.0. Detector 1 Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0 0 Prot..- Perm Protected Phases 1 6 2 24 4 3 Detector Phase 1 fi 2 24 4 4 It} Phase - Minimum lnitial(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4 0 4.0 4.0 14001622A_AMBD_PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL-110 HOMES Synchro 8 Report Page 1 YEAR 2019 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES - PROPOSED AM 1: ANDERSON FILL ROAD & KING STREET 120A 418/2015 111111111111111111,11 IN 111111 MI w6w It Total Split(s) 15,0 750 &0 25.0 25.0 20.0 Tofat SpEtt(lad,.; 24; oj :2Q$la7°lo- Maximum Green(s) 10.0 70,0 55.0 20,0 20.0 18.0 p. 41. .. < 4. �. ..... ... 2 . . : . All-Red Time(s) 1.0 1:0 1,0 1.0 1,0 0.0 0N. Tote!Lost Times 4 0 4.0 4.0 40 4,0 lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Made None Max Max None None l+fone .ry..'., Flash Dont Walk 11.0 MEAct Dot Green(s) 711 7111 56.1 77.2 171 1 T 1 of vle Ratio 0,68 0.81 6.72 0:17 0.66 0.59 000ua Delay. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 T' !"Way .. LOS B B C A D D ' Approach LOS 8 6 D Ob, iu Queue Length 95th(ft) #114 689 50fi 36 190 151 r1 llntst }.. ... .. .. 2I;s. ., 1n ... ... Turn Bay Length(ft) 75 200 250 Ba fipstYuR . ..1337 {1 ..., : ...._... . . Starvation Gap Reductn. 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn D 0 D 0 0 D .: . sit , ; ...,, ,4 _ hx­ Cycle Length 920 r Natural Cycle 80 �0oIT5�3 ,,Atateci„Uncpo>>�Iriated ...... .. :±; Maximum vle RafV D:81 1nteetr L(]51 ... Intersection Capacq Utiltzation 72.7% ICU Level of Service 0 S5th peTeentlle volume exceeds capacity,queue maybe longer queues avurr is r ex rr) attar two djri es ..... Splits and Phases 1:ANDERSON HILL ROAD&KING STREET(1 7A) P)01 ¢y 073 o4 106 YEAR 2419 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES - PROPOSED AM 2: INTERNATIONAL DRIVE & KING STREET (122A) 41812015 Lane Configurations r � VON'`�ichl).... 725 ...,,:43 . 1 .. ....;'. . Ideal Flow(vpt pl} 1900 19:00 19.00 1900 1900 1900 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 ] Tapsr t ertttr..( .. .. ....''. ..... .:... 25 .. ........:: ........ .. Lane Util.Factor 1.00 1..00 1.00 1,00 1,:00 1.00 ! r.t acipr. .. .. . .:... .... . 00 .: .:100 `gs... ..{ $6... .... l=rt 0.85.0 0.880 . ...: . .:... ..... Said. Flow(prat) 1810 1538 1718 1810 1719 1538 a;38... 0,950 �k P�►Yrlttted..... .... -� ..' Said,Flow(perm) 1810 1497 249 1'810 1684 1477 Ri�lit T. f6. fn Eked, Nc Yes Said Flow FOR) 120 Link Ulstanoe(ft) 1949 2649 1520 DonO_Peds.(#lhr) 10 ]0 10 10 Heavy Vehicles(%} 5% 5°lo- 5% 6% 5%6 5°la OM Shared Lane Traffic(90) Dane raug 1.4Z ... . .. as. ....... ao Enter Blocked Intersection NoNo No No No No. Medlan Width(ft) 12 12 12 Irl : ........... Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 18 16 Tvvo u. y LBt, urn�Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1:.00 100 1.00 1.00 100 Turntng Spd:'( tzhY. 9 Number of Detectors 0 0 1 0 1 1 Leading Detector(fl) 0 0 50 0 50 50 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 50:.. ...... .. 50 50 ...:_..: __.... .... ..... Detector 1qq Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Ci+Ex CI+Ex Cf....i1r1�,t .. .:. r .. .....i,,,. -... c�r._.�.i. .w a., �..... .. .... .._',..._ ... :. .. . ..,,'.. :.,.. ... .... ...:;, ........ .... , Detector 1 Extend(s) O 0 010 0,0 0,0 0,0 0.0 Etc °ink Detector 1 Delay(s) 0 0 0.0 0 0 0'0 0.0 0.0 Protected Phases 2 3 1 6 3 frtlrta,F�hases .. ... 2 ..... >: :. _ ..... ... . Detector Phase 2 3 1 .6 3 3 Ssrnrclt Phase. .. Ni: Minimum Initial(s) 5,0 3.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 140C1622A_AMBD PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL-110 HOMES Synchro 8 Report Page 3 YEAR 2019 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES - PROPOSED AM 2: INTERNATIONAL DRIVE & KING STREET (120A 418/2015 M«+rrrrrnplr: ? . Total Split(s) 46.0 25.0 14.0 60.0 25,0 25.0 Tfi+tdt.�pht,�°�).•::.. ..•...... ..��.�5`0. 1£#_�°la ._,1Ex5°�� .. It�'f°!°. ��,�+�;...-2��"/g ..:�.....� . :�; Maximum Green(s) 40.0 20,0 B.0 54 0 20 0 20,0 Alf Red Time(s) 1 0 t 0 1.0 10 10 1.0 lost Time Total Lout Time(s) 5,0 4.0 5.0 5 0 4.0 4,0 LeaWOO L aB. hood.. .. :. Lead L.ag Optim.i a? Yes Yes v ;( le�xtertsion(s)....... Recall Mode Max moire Mone Max lone None ,.......... Aotuated g!G Ratio 0.56 0.70 0.76 0.76 012 0.1.2 AA Control Delay A, 216 3,2 220.7 6.4 31.5 11.2 Total 139fay 2'2.6 3.2 220 7 0.4 .31.5. 11 2 tQS . .. F, . . ..I- A .. . . . $ Approach Delay 18,5 907 '17,0 A' r sae L4S. B P�p Queue Length 50th(ft) 278 22 244 916 20 0 43 ov Internal Link Dlst(ft) 1669 2569 1140 54. . . 4 . .. .... Base Capacity(uph) 1019 1307 369 1367 495 511 Spillhack Cap Reductn 0 0 D 0 0 0 RVs educed vJc Ratio _.o:. �. '� '� ::'t�� ��.t�, �� ,' �._ .._'.'..7 _� •._..... ..�.: � . _'.; � .. : 83 0.17 1.41 0.59 0.10 0,23 Area Type: Other Actuated Cycle LengthL 7213 I���u�a`]cycle � � ....• • ... : .... :: ...... ... . . .... .... ..�. ..-... .. .. .._:. .. . . ... Control Type:Sem Aet Uncoord Max<(num y/ca�0 141; 14 Intersection Signal Delay:65.9 Intersection LOS E ery el ICt ;evof 5tce p: 1�fersectron..C..apac�,�ljf+�atran•809°� :..� . ...... .. _ � _ . . . . . Analysis Period(min)15 9alurh ,BxGeesis Cep ijy,,queur;,,ts,fhc r tjcal�ylnlP. Ql Aeue shown is maxImu m after two cycles, .91attt prr,» iett? xcds oapay" ueue ma}r t}efongar, Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.. Splits and Phases: 2: INTERNATIONAL DRIVE&KING STREET{'12i1A �J 03 Y+a �� r� - �. � l.r�..suv���...y. �s.�-.:9�: ...�.�,:�2s'� v,s a i��� .�&:ua�.,,•._,a,k:::. y r�✓ twx, -�i YEAR 2019 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES - PROPOSED PM 1: ANDERSON HILL ROAD & KING STREET 129A 418/2015 Lane CDnfigurations l)rrrre:uPls..... ::... ..... ::� 3 . _-..�.`r.4. . 8�4 Ideal Flow.(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1940 19017 1900 _2C1EI. .;.,'25 . .. .: ....-.. '_. .. ... . Storage Lanes 1 4 1 1 Taper ,:. v.. :. . Lane Wil.Factor 1.Ob 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.b0 1.00 P ,ke. Frt 0.850 0:,850 ..... . . . .. Said.Flaw(prat) 1.719 1810 1810 1535 1718 1538 Satd.Flow(Farm) 186 1810 1810 1538 1679 1464 I fight-T en lied Satd.Flow(RTOR) i35. .. . ':3 Link Distance(tt) 1236 2649 2715 FW tin ' s}.:::..... 4 .. ..5 .6f.7. Confl Peds (#/hr) 10 10 10 10 P ' our.. Cl. ...... ` .. Heavy Vehicles5% 5°fe 5% 510 51/0 5°/0 Shared Lane Traffic lane" rr�upf>pvph}....._. . : 9 . ._. ►... $9Q ...... .. . ; i .. .:_.. Enter BlaW.cked Intersection No No. No No No No: Lena'Alignment,:.. .. . 1 1 eft.. Bight.. Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 Crosswalk Widlh(ft) 16 16 16 Tt�K�.�'s��L �a?.ft}Lana.:';; .._....;.r. .... ....----� � , .�:. �. .....`:.._,�... , .__... ::........ . ............ ... .. . . . .. Headway Factor 100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 U0 Number of Defectors. 1 7 7 1 1 1 Maw- Leading Detector(Ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 T,rallingl��t��in[(�).. °' ...: 0. . ... 0 .;�:;• 0 .; � 0.: �. . Detector 1 Po8ftiorl0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex Cl+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex GI+Ex (gct Dot®ctor 1 Extend(s} -.0.0 0 0 0 0 t)0 0.0 0 0 _..........0141-4 ... :.. Detector 1 Delay(s) 0,0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0,0 0.0 Protected Phases 1 6 2 24 4 3 RIO?mltted,Phses Detector Phase 1 S 2 2�4� 4 4 N[inimam Int#al:(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4:0 14001622A�FMBDPROPOSED RESIDENTIAL 110 HOMES Synchro 8 Report Page 1 YEAR 2019 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES - PROPOSED PM 1. ANDERSON HILL ROAD & KING STREET 120A 418/2015 t 4 . Total Split(s) 15.0 75,0 60.0 25.0 25.0 20.0 TOtal.Spl►t(3`� ...:.., ... 12'5°l0 . 62;5°k. .5(.4°/a .....';.. ... 2 ...... . . ik3a. ..2f?:8°�OT°h . . .. : .. ... . maximum Gram(s) 10,0 70.0 55.0 210 20,0 18.0 lIlays�.Trme,(8).:,.�... ,B ..... . d,4....... .' .D .. 4 .. :.. All-Red Time(s) 1,D 1.0 1.0 1.D 1.0 0.0 Lost TTEtredJs#.�$)... ... .. .* ' .......,. _........ _.,.. . . - .... Total Lost Time(s) 4,0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Leh fu ._.... . .. . : Lead ,.....I"ag �.�..... .:I �-ead. ... .. Laad Lag Cptlmrze? Yes Yss Yes Yes Yes llehrcle Extensxrr(s} •:. 3(t . ..-3 q ._ .3 } :313 31 3 Recall Wile None Max Max done none Done Wali> 54 . Flash DDnt Walk(s) 11.0 Act E�ffct Green(s) 710 710 56.9 819 21.0 21,0 Ap�ts�p( 9f0_t vlc Ratio 0,58 0.51 0,86 0,12 0.4.7 1.04 '.."; 2 :... $ .. 12. . Queue Delay 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 D.0 Total 4 �1. .. ::2 LOS B A C A D IF Approach LOS A C E Q'u`Izis Lngt ,alth.f �... 8........°l3.. Queue Length 951h(ft) 82 235 #746 27 982 #389 (n1E �af L�r1 Dls(. 1 175 2569 t x ._.... Turn Bay Length(ft) 75 2 5 DO 2 fl 04 'VOWY 00 Starvation C�ya�ppReductn A0 s5 (0� 0 0h J0� .I Storage Gap.R.eductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cyc{l�e Length 120 4 90 Natural Cycle 130 Maximum vac Ratio:1.04 t1:Lit" tlpri Slgn i tSc icy` 1. .. .. . tntetS f IrWrseotion Capacity Uhlizahon 72,5% ICU Levef of Serv4ce C >kr1tifldtl_(mlrt) (5;, Volume exceeds capacity,queue is theoretically infinife- w c�u�pe shavur�Ts.r��xLl�nrr,1�[� - # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity,queue.may be longer 140C1622A PMBD_PROP©SED RESIDENTIAL-110 HOMES Synchro 8 Report Page 2 YEAR 2019 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES - PROPOSED PM 1; ANDERSON HILL ROAD & KING STREET 120A) 418/2015 Witg and Phases: 1:ANDERSON HILL ROACH&KING STREET(120A). ... . �3 4 OREM 14001622A—PMBD_PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL-110 HOMES Synchro 8 Report Page 3 YEAR 2019 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES - PROPOSED PM 2: INTERNATIONAL. DRIVE & KING STREET Q20A4/812015 Lane Configurations t r (vph}.. Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1300. 1900 190D 190.6 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 T. 06, .... . . . . :. .. .... Lane Util,Factor 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 Rid$Eke F c#a0, 3 .,...�46 . .....- D,�B At9E: :,.,... . ........ FrtU.Z. 0.850 0;850 . .._ `I60 Satd.Flow(prat) 1610 1536 1799 1810 1719 1538 Fit Ps;rtTitteaj.. Satd,Flow(perm) 1810 1497 323 1810 1684 1477 ITajh'Tarn on Red' . :No. Yes Satd.Pow.(RTOR) 310 .... 35 . ..... Link Distance(ft) 1949 2&49 1520 Conf1,Peds.(ft r) 10 10 10 10 ... Heavy Vehicles(°k) r5% 5°lEat 5% st5°yl�� 5% 5% 1�.[ Z.7 rt.,,' �?.. --u�'lr,..� �,.k'rt, �,,.. d,s .3;�t•'.� . .: -._ ._,...... Shared Lane Traffic LasteCrotp.F.l1 .(kq>)... . Enter blocked lnterseetion No No .140 No No No. Lane Ail it— left .:Egtit.. ...Leffi leftt0.0 Median Wldth(ft) 12 12 12 Lir1k, fset{ft)....:..... _.. ,. ... .. ........ ... D ... Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two,waYhef.Tum.Lane. y , [ } Haadwa Factor U0 1 00 Ir DD 1.00 11-00 1 DO Tumltl9. Psed.(l�Pff}......: . .. ....:: ,......;15 1 ...,. ...... ._. . . Numherof Detectors 0 0 1 0 1 1 Leading Detector(ft) 0 0 50 0 50 50 7rail�rig E1atEar.(f# . Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 leiter 1 Srze{fk) :5p zy Detectur 1 Type CI+Ex G1+Ex 01+Ex CA x Ct+Ex CI+Ex D t c#q�1 Char pel .. ....: .. .:w<. ... ..._.. i Detector 1 Extend(s) Do 0.0 O D 0.10 0 0 O D Detector 1 Delay(s) 0.0 0 0 0.0 D.0 10 0.0 7urD Type ;:IVB...prFtgv pmt pt....... : I ._, :Prot... t~'er � .:...�. ... . . Protected Phases 2 3 1 6 3 Prmittd f�hses �.. ::. -. ...•.. Detector Phase 2 3 1 6. 3 3 G�i`3?hase _ ... Minimum Initials) 5.0 3,0 4.0 3.0 3.D 3.0 14001622A_PMBD_PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL-110 HOMES Synchro 8 Report Page 4 YEAR 2019 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES - PROPOSED PM 2: INTERNATIONAL DRIVE & KIND STREET 120A) 41812015 Mm,trira-,S Itt(S?.: Total Split(s) 40 25.0 14 0 6D.0 26.0 25.0 Tcltl-Splifi-(°la S .:T°!u Maximum Green(s) 40:0 20.0 8'a 54.0 20.0 20.0 110- T AlkRed Time(s) 1,0 1.0 1.0 1:0 10 10 Last Ti .AdJt�st,:(s3 . �;0. �r€k. .... 1;4....... . �4 ,.... 10 :..:�t3. ... .. '. ... .... .. me . . Total Lost Time(s) 5.D 4.0 &.0 6,0 4.0 4.0 LeadlLag Lag L2'a�h Lead Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Recall MDde flax Nona NoneMax None None A ffC! resz {s} 4 '.7 Actuated 910 Ratio 051 0.74 0.67 0.67 0.22 0,22 uta Ratip :.0;.7.6 4. 6. Q G4 0.67 6 Control Delay 24:3 2.2 15 12.2 36.9 3Z5 Total Delay 24.3 2.2 9.5 12.2 35.1 32.5 LOS G R p, :. O C. Approach Dolay 22.3 11,8 33.3 Approach LQS Queue length 50th(ft) 301 6 29 245 100 101 �W� ffl►t.95th,(S) .'; .. ....: 8... . ..34 I .i.. 2 Internal Link Dist(ft) 1869 2569 1440 Tln Bays Base Capacity(Vph) 916 9171 368 1215 440 609 Sp:illback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Siogge CeI_ ll ! . N. Reduced ulc Ratio 0.76 0,06 0,.43 0,67 0,50 0.83 Area Type, Other Actuated Cycle Length 82.2 Control Type Semi Act Uncoord inter&eetian Signal Delay 21.4 Intersection LOS C Infa`r`eakr CapaCttytfiljtia'�,6 .80, . ...:� ll✓�.Laye(.>�fYSePnce Analysis Period(min) 15 96t) p rceniffe v©fume axcegd .cap ty,quarte ay.beJ..r19er Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. C Its and Phases: 2: INTERNATIONAL DRIVE&KING STREET I2DA + ��w ��� #M .wL� �• ." R' '� .fi5- �4,:•_ .«.-.+,_:.. _�F',4,��l'�.t� ',+adaF la: 6 -+cam gg ni=✓.[° J.r�`�`, '... 4-':FF S•ast, E"eN�'3�;ii,� 14001622A_PMBD_PROPOSED RESIOENTiAL-110 NAMES Synchro 8 Report Page 5 W/ SIGNAL OPTIMIZATION YEAR 2019 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES WEEKDAY PEAK AM HIGHWAY HOUR 1: ANDERSON HILL ROAD & KING STREET (120A 4!8!2015 Lana ConBguratians '" ` Ideal Flog(uphill) 1900 1900 1060 1900 1900 1900 as a Le. th it :284. 0. 9 n9 O . .....:.. . . ... U ...... . .. . . Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 Taper t e.gth(ft) 25 .... Larne Util•Factor 1.D.D 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,DD 1.00 Frt f}.t#50 0.850 F,ft U.6q. s Satd.Flow(prat) 1719 1$10 1810 1538 1719 1538 fI 20 Satd,Flow(perm) 397 1810 1810 155 1670 1451 fglit Turn oti..Rec .... Satd,Flow(RTOR) Oft,Speed,(mPh,; 35 :'30 ?r Link Distance(ft) 1256 2649 2715 Travel:Tln7e(s}: ; 24 5 :S 6 °;O 17 . . Cunfl,Peds. (#)hr) 10 10 10 10 Pe4S Hour,Factor... 9�1 a 494...... 0: 4... ..04... . '; . Heavy Vehicles(°/n} 5°!n 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% AEf�•. Iow,.�P $t?,.. .. Q .•. .:. 9",...._ 4X(...•, 3{.._... : 3' •. _ :_._�. _ ..... Shared Lane Traffic Labe_CoUP l"low.(rAh� X8(1 . _f05 .._...?(9.. 2i31 ..... 2Qn...... .153 ,.... : Enter Blocked Intersection No No. No No No X10 bane At�gnmeilt ... ... Xa �- • . teft Lefk ._.._; .�... R+ghiN ,': e ...... 19ht. ..• Median Wldth(ft} 12 12 12 Crosswalk Width(H) 16 15 16 Teo.vxy Left Turn,U. Headway Factor 1 00 1.00 1 DD 1.00 1,00 UG . : Number of Detectors 1 t 1 1 1 1 r. t tESgr enolate Leading Detector(ft} 50 50 50 50 50 50 TPIIin 10eteirtat(fiE) .....,.' - ... ..:: _...... .....:;44 ., . ...._.' 4..•. ..... ., Detector 1 Po0lon(fk) 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 5 50 50 50 ,... i Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+1=x CI+Ex C1+Ex CI+Ex CI*Ex Dste"(�-1hWnet....... : Detector 1 Extend(s) 0;Q 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0 0 Detector 1 Delay(.$) U.D 0.0 0;0 0.0 0,0 0.0 Turfr.xYp ..A ... ..... ..: . . .. gt *Pt ....._ ... . A.....pttay. . .: 'rot .:berm..... Protected Phases 1 6 2 24. 4 3 _ f? rnittti Ptiasas ..._.... 1 6- Detector Phase # 8 2 24 4 4 Minimum Initial(s) 4,D 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 14001622A AMNB-OPTIMIZATION Synchro 8 Report Page 1 YEAR 2019 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES WEEKDAY PEAK AM HIGHWAY HOUR 1 : ANDERSON HILL ROAD & KING STREET 120A) 418/2015 Minirr�u Sp1ifi(s) 90.. 9.A 2Q0 . .... Total Split(s) 19:0 8D.0 61,0 20 fl 20 0 20.0 15:$9b. X177°�u. 50$°/° 16;;7n . _t6.7° ..., _ 7°7n. .. . Maximum Greon(s) 1�0 75.0 56.0 15.0 15 0 I&D Mello fpm .(s}: ..... :: .... . . :a....:.: �. . ..... 0........ , .. ...4,� ... .. .....:: . . .... All-Red Time(s) 1.0 1 0 10 10 1.0 0.0 4ost Tlre,Adtlst(s}... Total Lost Time(s) 4,C 4.0 43: 4.0 4.0 Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vert Extension.(5) . :0 Recall Made None Max Max None None None A. Flash Dont Walk-(s) 1 Act Effct Green(s) 76.0 76,0 58.4 78.0 15-6: 16.6 at�ate,t 1CFtaGa A-7 ..... 11r,.. 0:„f .. J :v:v 9. ..... .... .. - vlc Ratio 0.58 0.78 0.68 0.17 0.74 0,67 8$ :121. 3,2 ft 78 7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 D.O 0.0 Total;� lay g.8. .. 121, .. 1;8 7 '3 2 LOS A B B R E E pdbr Detay4. Approach L05 B B l q'u ue'L ngthr t6(ft}, 42.. .,.3 2 3t17, 7 ,. ,.. ....:.. . Queue Length 95th(ft) Go 518 446 45 #225 #176 Itjtmal I_ink_ t�f))_ :55 ,. 265 .:...: 117h 2 ,, , TTurrny Baby Length(ft) [/15j Q 20[0} 25.0 f�Starvation GaspRpeedyu,etn IA0 X00 0� 0 0 0 ,'.. L..._ ...i._ _ ..... ....... .. F:... Storage Cap Reductn. 0 0 0 0 0 4 ...Z:Q T?..... ,Q d Cycle Length 120 449 :..::. Natural Cycle 90 Ca"tr`1T ,,,�k t lreogrdiratf ? .. Maximum vfi;RaJo 78 i31 -5 - I�ters�ctron�cgnal.����]�'.1.8.9..._. Intersection Capacity Utilization 70:6% ICU Level of Servioe G # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity,queue may be longer. Queue shitxufn Cs maxrFurrl atter fw3p,eycfes. . . fits and Phases: 1:ANDERSON HILL ROAD&KING STREET(120A) y� I 0 i 02 3 64 ct sir , --k -'�rF "5d, $:'s.yL �° �.7, •iP.3.rm ,�,. ,:,rY --kut✓•.eJn��MwrlwK.f.Y°.kY -5�,.. ¢el--. _. e d• ,. wS�K .. _ - - - YEAR 2019 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES WEEKDAY PEAK AM HIGHWAY HOUR 2: INTERNATIONAL DRIVE & KING STREET 120A 402015 Now Lane Configurations " 7 p} 75 .. 98` ,.,.,45� . ....7 4., :..:� ..... ( p Ideal Flow v h I 19x0... 1500 1900 1900 19DO 1900 .325. ... 450 ;':.. :260 �''' .0... � :• .: . , . . ., .: S�R�ageLeng#haft} .. .. Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 Tap46,ngth.(ft)' 25 ;25 ... .. Lane UJI,Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.Da 1.00 t'e`d BIKe t'auor', 1(;00 . Frt 0.850 0.850 It Prod ted wQ5p �_,. _ Satd.Flow(pret) 1810 1538 1719 1810 1715 1638 i Satd.Flaw(perm) 1810 1495 193 1819 1573 1379 'Y�s Satd Flow(RTDR) 69 r s. Link Distanee(R) 1949 2649 1520 Trav�ITime.(s ... B 34 Conf1 Peds (#!hr) 10 10 10 10 Rai Hir.Eator. .,_..... vea Heavy Vehicles °/a 5°l0 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% Shared Lane Traffic(`Yo} Enter Blocked Intersection No NoNo No No No Lar#e9��3 Ffk• Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 0..... . ; Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two, way, Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1 DO 1 00 1 D.C. 100 Tllmirjc�aPeed.(M h) ,• 15< 15. £..:: . _. .. .. . Number of Deteetars 0 0 1 0 1 1 6154 �3Lf g_ 0", 1 Ling Detector(ft) 0 0 50 0 50 50 WO p Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Tet`etlr 15�zetwf) y, ,.'..n` .... Detector 1 Type u+Ex 0+Ex CI+Ex C,I+Ex C1+Ex CI+Ex Id1 � � tItnTtt �t ,.(:::....... Detector 1 Extend(s) 00 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0,0 _-.0. . .0 V'- Qp 0 Oar 1 fgetle. $).. E3 0. . A. Detector 1 Delay(s) 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 0'a 0.0 Turn TYPe..,_:.. NR. Io _..p1 pE . . ::NA-4 Protected Pfims 2 3 1 6 3 Detector Phase 2 3 1 6 3 3 Minimum Initial(s) 5.0 3.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 14001622A_AMNB-OPTIMIZATION Synchro 8 Report Page 3 YEAR 2019 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES WEEKDAY PEAK AM HIGHWAY HOUR 2: INTERNATIONAL DRIVE & KING STREET '120A 402015 Total Sp€it(s) 50:C 9.0 260 76,0 9.0 9,0 ptal Silfit-{°/a).. 588°Ic 'I.O fi4/o. 31 fi�1a ...89.4°Ia. { Maximum Crean(s) 44.0 4.0 20.0 70.0. 4.0 4.0 40... ....: 0.. . .._.50 _, ..:4....... 4 . All-Red Time(s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.D 1'0 1'0 f nst, . ' ... .... ................ Total Lost Time(s) 5.0 4.0 6.0 5 0 4,0 4 0 Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yea Ixtenstart,s . ..' Qi��.. Recall Made Max None None Max None Nave a Fct m.e.rf 6) . . :46.2;r:. 2 . 710 Actuated g1C Ratio 0.53 0.60 .0.84 .0.84 0.06 00a . . 0:5 .... 0 4T.. . to Control Delay 29.9 7.1 50,0 3.6 45.2 21,6 _-.0.4" . ..: Q. . .4•i Total Delay 29./9 7..9 50,D 3.6 45.2 21,6�r os 1V f..F.. : M.... Approach Delay 2,5.2 215 28.3 QueueLeagih 50th(ft) 372 42 984 81 14 0 Qirlsngt)r5i11. �.... :#.t27 ► ... ... .`.: ........, q ,..:40 internal Link Dist(1t) 1868 2569 1.4j4(0] T6rn: Base Capacity(vph) 962 902 5H 1519 109 946 Sa�+�ail, 11apfedc#0 0 4... ..., ,0.. A.... SpilPbaek Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 4 Reduced ulc Ratio 0;87 0.24 0.94 4,53 4.27 0.47 MOM 111111111111111 11 11 11 Area Type Other � Ie Lengttl 85' .. Actuated Cycle Length:85 Control Type:Serni.Act-Uncoord Intersection Signal Delay 23.4 Intersection LMC �tlferpectia►.QlppoY.014 W" Analysts Period(min)15 , percetil ,unitrj" e �capacrl,gpett €ftay be,fnger .' Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. lits and Phases: 2: INTERNATIONAL DRIVE&KING STREET(1A) `p1 02 "J 23 TIM 14001622A AMNB-OPTIMIZATION Synchro 8 Report Page 4 YEAR 2919 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES WEEKDAY PEAK PM HIGHWAY HOUR 1: ANDERSON HILL ROAD & KING STREET 120A 4/812015 Lane Configurations �S uafume tt 153.. 500 1 7 ,..: 05......... ;. Idem Flour(yphpf) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 St`arage Lenge: 5_ . ... : 2Qi} .,..75[1... D Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 Taper.lren9. .:f ) . t._...:. 5.. _..... . . .. .... LaneUtil: Factgr 1:00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 .....::. ... .. . �9B ...:4,96..... .:.. : .' :.�•... - .�: Frt 0.850 0,8.50 Fit Prateed Said.Flow(prot) 1719 1810 1810 1538 1718 1538 . 8atd,Flow(perm) 217 1890 1810 1538 1686 1471 Rt���Turn on:Eked.. .. ..... . : : ...,...' ........-`.. . .. . . .. .. .� .. . .:, .. .:; �:.... :.�. : 6atd Flaw(RTOR) Link Distance(ft) 1256 264-9 2715 Traysl Tlfie(5):: 4 .. ;.'•rI f ._...:_'.,... ..:�4.7..... . Confl:Peds.(#1hr) 10 10 10 10 P' nkat l adtor.. ._.. X96 . ...411, 9 ..... #7 9 ...... : : .. . Heavy Vehicles(°1a) 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 51/o Adl.. ivwEra` Shared Lane Traffic Lane_ rup. lou.(uf ) 159. .. .:64, ....884 . _ .._............ .... .. 1 Enter Blocked Intersection No Na No No No No 1=eft„_.. 19ht. L';Figl._..._ Median Wldth(ft) 12 12 12 10 Crosswalk Width(ft). ..... 16 16 { Tugq.y.�y.LANim Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1 00 1.00 1.00 1 DO Tumlr( ,S eed Qt h 15 9. ..... 15 .. .... 9.. Number of Detectors 1 1 1 1 1 1 I l TeTrip qtp, . . Leading Detector(ft) 50 5050 50 50 50 TI-ailip g Detector 4 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 at 1 Stze(ft ::: . .. ..;.5th 50 54 _ ..'_.. . .. . 5Q ..;;.. ... .. . Detector.1 Type CI�+�Ex Ct+Ex 01+-ExCtfEx Ct+Ex CI-Ex qat 1.no!. ..... OE (Detector 1 Extend(s) 0.0. . 0.0 0,0 0.0 0-G 0.0 Mr ,... ..,. Dotootor 1 Delay(s) 0.0 D.0 0,0 10 00 0.0 Turn.. YI ... PIT! PiPerin- Protected Phases 1 6 2 24 4 3 Detector Phase 1 6 2 24 4 4 dlt ”Phase... Minimum Initial(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4:0 4.0 14001622A_PMN13-OPTIMIZATION Synch.ro 8 Report Page 1 YEAR 2019 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES WEEKDAY PEAK PM HIGHWAY HOUR 1: ANDERSON HILL ROAD & KING STREET Q20A4/912015 Total Split(a) 10,0 71.0 61:0 29.0 29,0 2D.0 T4121'Splitj°la}. . 83°/n 590.. O.:a% .. 2 ,"z°r .2.........:.2°�.... T7°i Maximum Green(s) 5,0 66.D 56.0 24,C 24,0 18 0 e1�5 Time(s} 4 D. 4.0 D ;4 U. 4 02.0:. . All-Red Time(s) 1.0 1.D 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 LPS Tlrie Adiust(s).. .. a.0 10 -.E C1.. .. 0 ... . .:... Total Lost Time(s) 4.0 4 0 4,0 4.0 4,0 � 9 ..... . .. . .. :....: ag..... .. �9. . 1� .. .tread. L Lead Lag Optfrr n� Yes `Fes Yes Yos Yes i }ixtertsra►s{s)........ ... :. (0..........._.............. . . :`::..._ .... ;3D x...'50........ ...._ Recall Mode None Max Max None None Nona Flash.Dant Walk(s) 11,0 Act Eftnt Green(s) 67.0 67.4 57.0 88.0 25.,.0 25.0 Aptu gfC latro..... . Q87... . 0 87.. . ..17;57.. 0:89 . .0`25 ....: 25 .. ....... ft Ratio 0.58 . D.50 0.84 0.110.35 0:87 rjftrglLlelay. :,-. . .. :6D ........: . Queue Delay D.0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Totat QelaX3.0.. LOS Y... .. C A C A C E PPF4 E et y: _.` z` . .:23x1 ..... ........... . . .. r........ ._. Approach LOS B C D '� Queue Length 95th(ft) #69 247 #638 16 147 #348 .26 ;� ....:Lm 7 �s .... ._ .... . . 6 ' .. Turn Bay Length(ft) 78 200 250 aeapeC;tY.(WP1} ::;235. ;i2� . ;10131 ....."I: .. ...:429 ... :3y. .. Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 MTK 00 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0. 0 0 0 Arm�'' .:.; ...:. , h.�`" .. .. ... ...... ;.. , .. .. .. . : :... .... . . :. . . , _ Cycle Length:120 Natural Cycler 120 pr1Yl Type,: [ atad 1Jcnordtnated ......: Maximum v1d matin:0.87 interseettd .Slgnai_ elay 25.x. IntelsetinCr Intersection Capacity Utilization 70.8% ICU Level of Service C 4thlyslsenclmin, 5,' # 951h percentile volume exceeds capacity,queue maybe longer. Gluaue siaWi�;gmxmurp. € r.tQdCylesF... . ::.. .. . fits and Phases: 1:ANDERSON HILL ROAD&KING STREET('12... �'} 1 �+ 3 s` 04 YEAR 2019 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES WEEKDAY PEAK PM HIGHWAY HOUR 2: INTERNATIONAL DRIVE & KING STREET 120A 41812015 Lane Configuraftvns �' � � '� 1 EjY E Idea[Flows(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1SQ0 1900 1600 Mala a Len Wage Lares 1 1 1 1 Lane Util,Fagtor 1.00 1.D0 1.00 1A0 1,00 Fri 0;850 0.850 Fiti(�ratected44x,950 950 . Satd. Flow phot) 1810 1538 1719 181C 1719 1538 Satd.Plow(perm) 1810 1498 374 1 B10 1689 1481 t Yes.`ht,7um oA Ra - :. Satd Flow(RTOR) 243 ink Duped(ml3h)...... . Link Distance(ft) 1949 2549 1524 1 . ., 346 Confl Peds (#Ihr) 10 10 10 10 fi�'�k.Nour t«al 13.84 frB� ( 84 r}:Sd.-.._ .?. (}84.. Heavy 1leh€cies(°!o) 5'!0 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% O. . .. $ :.. ....: ...... .. I}..... ;,2Q ......:473 ... Shared Lane Traffic(%) a0e.gip.Eow..Eul '.... 699 :44 96 °814I.....:..;242.... . 473 Enter Blocked interseeflon No No No No No No Lt]e1E903 ., 1.s: .:: ,E9t e Lefte €gt� Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 crosswalk Width ft 16 16 16 Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 IA > , Tri>3� Pgedt!mph) �......._. .. Nurnlaer of Datecturs 0 0 1 b 1 1 etea "fen1P]ate .......-.'. ..... 4 f., ......' Leading Detector(ft) 0 D 50 0 fid 60 70. Nz fiIlFri Celegr(ft ..... U ... . . : 0tt:...;:. ...._:;......4 .....'..: .. . detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 tdr 1 S€zO...... F. Deteotor I'Type CI+Ex OI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Q+Ex Ct+Ex Rt Detector 1 Extend(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 .0.0 tett 1,Quite . l}{) tl 0[p 4 r t)0 ' e...,_r.:, �. ...,_ _... _.... Detector 1 delay(s) a.0 0 D 0.0 0.0 0.0 tk O ` Turypg..._....�.. NA.. Pmay.....Rt 'pt . Ili .. ....Prat.. ,Perm..... Protected Phases 2 3 1 6 3 P ,4cnitted,Pfiases.. .... :..: . -... . fi..... :...... ... . 3.. Detector Phase 2 3 1 6 3 3 �wfteh'Pi�ase.. . .. .... ..:`. ... . . .... . .. . .... ........ . .. Minimum Initial(s) 5.0 3.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 3,0 14001622k_PMNB-OPTIMIZATION Synchro 8 Report Page 3 YEAR 2019 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES WEEKDAY PEAK PM HIGHWAY HOUR 2: INTERNATIONAL DRIVE & KING STREET 120A 4lsiz015 Mlni�rt,iinm Sp)I�.(�) .,`.,, .::�. �._. ,<�;�r�r, ,_.,;z�zt� .._...��JQ "1`1 Q ��} � ....:9,�.. ., , ... ...:, .. . •.. ; ., .. : . .: . .. . . . . . Total Split(s) 47.0 28.0 13,0 5T 0 28.0 28.0 ....... .. . ;:. . . ... Maximum Green(s) 41.0 23:0 4.0 51.0 2.3 0 23.0 Wm 54 .414ed Time(s) �,0 1,0 1.0 1,D 10 1.0 Total Lost Time(s) 5.0 4,0 5.0 5.0 4,0 4.0 Leed lag Dptimie2 Yes Yes tlehicle„Extenata�.( ...... . : . .. : . ... 0 . ....�?. . .. Reoall Mode Max Nona None Max None Nana gEfie#Greerj'( .. . ..-;. 5. ..... 52 ... .. 2 ....14...: 1'34_..... Actuated glC Ratio. 0.55 0.80 0 65 4,85 0,24 0,24 4� .. .. 3tl...... ',6 .b 49 . ..r)8 . .... ." Control Delay 20.6 1A 8.9 14.3 .30,2 32.4 Total Delray 20.6 1.4 9.9 14.3 302 32A Approach Belay 19.5 131 31.7 Queue Length 50th(ft) 289 3 19 270 87 114 ueue;�ng `; t�t. . ....... . . _.,` .... .. :. . iritemal Link Dist(ft) 1869 2569 1440 T .��kr. ., ._.:,. .... �_ Base Capacity(vph) 996 1262 325 117151.3 612 IT-0...,.. �......: ......_. Spillback Cap Redcctn 0 4 0 0 4 0 St4,let.6uch...... Reduced Wa Ratiq 0.7Q 0.03 0,30 0.69 0.39 41.77 Area Type Other Actuated Gycle Length 80.7 : Co ntrol Type Semi Act Uncoord Intersection Signal Delay 20.8 Intersection LOS C In' r5ispae►ty Utrl�zi4�f 64 0°l° 3 � J.fue. ,. ... ..._... ._r. .. ...... Analysis Period(mfn)15 95#h,pencefltlle y4lnme axCoe :. ... Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. p#its and Phases: 2: WERNATIONAL DRIVE&KING STREET 120A 4I 02 :ea 1�s,+. '�' ,s�,' -.rs`�.� �'��.-- � s Gx, r `v " �' .' ��xu�%k€'.� 'L.;'�;�'�.•:i:.�?!, way: - '�'�: r,�-.,�, �y „"�,�'s� '"�a;•y� c. "�E�,„� nom,_- s�'� �.y`.��' �`�k.,�._d a�'"ss;�;-��F _. - 14001622A.PMNB-OPTIMIZATION Synchro 8 Report Page 4 YEAR 2019 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES -APPROVED AM 1: ANDERSON HILL ROAD & KING STREET120A) 41812015 Lare Configurations r . 63.. t3& Ideal Flow(vphpl) 19a0 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Lanes 1 9 1 ! Taper eE3 th,:{ff) 25 :' _ .. ... ...'.: fi. Lane Util, Factor 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1,00 1.00 ' . Frf 0:85t) 0,950 Sratd.Flow(pmt) 1719 1810 1810 1538 (1719 1538 . 0d"1 ...... ..... .....V_? .. 4 ._. R.-.. x.. .. _. Satd.Flow(perrn) 359 1810 1810 1538 1567 3447 Satd Flaw(RTOR) , Lmk Distance(ft) 1256 2649 2715 .... 617 Cornfl, Peals:.(#Ihr) 10 10 10 10 Ptak furac(or x:'34...... , f3 94.. . ..0, 4...... . ... 94.......: . . . Heavy Vehicles(%) 5°% 5% 5°fa 5% 5% 5% Ad Fktur('�P.i? ': . ..... . . ........ .. .. .,. , Shared Lane Traffic(°fo) Lans.iarcxlp f� t(vp#�). ,`.... 28D... . '243 .......... Enter Blocked Intersoction No No ND No No No Earle.Akignt0en .... F Left :...Leff Wdian Width(ft) 12 12 12 Crosswalk V i.dth(ft) 16 16 16 Tiro way Letirh lana Headway Factor 100 1.00 300 1 00 1.0.0 100 Numkr of Deteoturs ge Leading Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50 Q { j Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 eldx- 4 �ze(1t _. .... 50... 51 50 5t).. f'K ..... f ........: ......,.. ,....... . Detector'1 Type Ct+Ex CI+Ex 01+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Extend(s) 0.0 0 a 0 0 0.0 D.0 0 0 aetta 1 qute{ ! _o' iz >a. Detector 1 Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 YIYTYAp. . ", pit+fit, f+fA ISR ptFaar* P[pE ,1? rrtt Protected Phases 1 6 2 24 4 3 Peril Phases. . .... .. ..i .. Detector Phase 3 6 2 24 4 4 Su�rch'P[ase . Minimum Initial(s) 4.0 4..0 4,0 4.0 4.0 4.0 14001622A_AMBD_APPROVED OFFICE-280,000 S.F.-OPTIMI7ATION Synchro 8 Report Page 1 YEAR 2019 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES -APPROVED AM 1- ANDERSON HILL. ROAD & KING STREET 120A 418/2015 Total Split(s) 21.0 $1.D 60 0 15 4 19 Q 20 0 T : Maximum Green(s) 18.0 76.0 55,0 14.0 14.0 19,0 RW . .- �.-' :4 0 :. . .. ...: ..... .. All-Red Time(s) 1:0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Q,0 Lost Time Rct'ust s Total Lost Time(s) 4.0 4:0 4,0 4.0 4.0 L "Eil,Lag . . . '. .. L �ad Lag L 49. . .dead: Lead-Lag Optlmize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes V,�hc,,�a Ex#�rlsln(s) .. .. D. .. -i3'€�...... ..MOM 3 R.... ... B..... ::S 0, Recall,Mode None Max Max !!lone Nome None tM 'TEme. }.. : .: :u... . 5a Flaeh Dant Wally{s} 1 H. Act Eftct Green(s) 77 0 77 Q 573 76.8 15.0 15.0 t' traed giC Rat p vlc Ratio 0.58 0.89 0.71 0.17 0:89 0:71 ,rntrnl Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0,0 0 0 0 Q 0,0 ;96 . . '80. 20.4 Total-q�ray � � . :. �:. LOS A B C A E E Approach LCIS B B E eue L ►9J( }...:... 4�. ...,.47p 3, 3,.. . , �4d ...... . Queue Length 95th(ft) 85 #981 484 52 4280 9186 ntdrnal N ' inc It(ft} ..: ,.:,.,:f,. �.. .. Turn Bay Length(ft) 75 200 250 BaCpapt _� }... . QT. ;.' 8.5_.:1{? B . 1: 81 . _ 57...... :.i17......:.... .. .,. a Starvation Cap Reduatn 0 D D 0 4 0 ' allaCaperiucir� LEI -.:.,0.. Storage Gap Red uctn 0 0 0 0 0 0 k�e�uced uic_k�a�rc� . 53�, ;1389„ VN a Type.. -.::........ ? r:_ .........� Cyd�,,Length 120 Natural Cycle;140 Cob#roi X'wp 'b -tJn ord►fated y !Maximum vfc Raft 0.89 Ilitr~tsiltngnal Eltay 24 I lte[sbot1 i(7 - Intersection Capacity Ul iization 80.0% ICU Level of 5ervrce b all Fero tm�n)1: # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity,queue maybe longer, Queueown,ts m& irum after#wnyptes Splits and Phases: 1:ANDERSON HILL ROAD&KING STREET fl..P11A . l 02 ` 3 v4 -10 PEAR 2019 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES - APPROVED AM ; ; INTERNATIONAL DRIVE & KING STREET (120A 418015 Lane Cortfigurations .......... 7U6.....` ..., .`: . ... Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 m! ....: a0.... Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 fiapsr::E en$th:(.ft) 26 5. . Lane LM, Factor 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 BteFaGtRr-., .. 097 1;0Q...,. . Frt Q.850 0.850 Itiofc� .. ¢EQ. p 950 v Satd. Flow(.prat) 1810 1538 1718 1810 1719 1538 Lini .21 Im Satd, Flow(porm) 1810 1492 168 1810 1573 1379 R'irt Turn na Red No Yes Satd.Flaw(RTOR) 98 Linl Speed(nrph). 35 : . . 35 30.. . Link Distance(ft) 1949 2549 1520 Tr, g( Conft.Peds. (#1hr) 10 10 10 10 P I Fkaur Factor 4 9 . ....Q B0 ...,... Heavy Vehicles(°t°) 5%y 5% 6% 6% 5% Shared Lane Traffic Ean .,GrauP...FIi .{yPf).. 1 700 ... ... 3g,._;. ...... . ... .. .... .. . -... . .. Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No : .;:: _ Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 mmmmCrosswalk INldth(ft) 16 .. . 16 16 Twn way,Ee(Curn,Lan .:; -.. Headway Factor 1.0.0 100 1.00 1,00 1 00 1 Oa . : . . Number of Detectors 0 0 1. I �bf Corf1Pl'ate�nlr,r. .S % ik, a5.4 Leading Detector(ft) 0 Q 50 0 50 50 . . .. . Defector 1 Position(ft) 0 Q 0 0 0 0 4 er o 'I Stzef ) Detector I Typo GI+Ex G+Ex GI+Ex G1+Ex Ci+Ex GI+F-x Detector 1 Extend:(s) 0.0 0 0 Q Q G.0 0.0 0-0 Dfppf 1,Queue(s?. �.,..�®0 .. '. 0... . =04.. .:.. � ` Q _. ........ . 0 4y Detector 1 Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn 1 P pm+pt N, r4t .. .. . ._ :<. Protected Phases 2 3 1 6 3 IrrrttttePhases„ 3 t . Detector Phase 2 3 1 6 3 3 Minimum Initial(s) 5.0 3.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 14001622PL,AIBD..APPROVED OFFICE 280,000 S.F.-OPTIMIZATIONSynchro 8 Report Page 3 YEAR 2019 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES -APPROVED AM 2: INTERNATIONAL DRIVE & KING STREET 120A 402015 .. ......... MUM N1�nit�i��t Splif(0j ..... :.' Total Split(s) 43.0 9.4 33.0 7U 9.0 9.0 89-;4°!0 MW mum Green(s) 37,0 4.0 27.0 70,0 4,C 4.0 "elkar : `o .. ....,4 :' .. All Red Time(s) 1 0 1 0 10 10 10 10 !ost.Tlre Ad}ust(e? 10 © fl•...... .1.01 . ... 1( Total Lost Time(s) 5.0 4.0 5 0 5,L1 4.0 4,0 � ..:.'�.. Lead Lag Optimize? Yes Yes xtpriski (sj .. 0 . Recall Mode Max None None Max None None A4 Efifct;Greer>W Actuated gX Ratio 0.45 0.62 0,84 084 0.06 0,08 ylc Raq .1..4. 39. ..... 4............ . Control Delay 67A 12.0 862 16 49.9 22.5 ' Qu�;ue Delay.....:.. " ,a t �..•.. a .. t .:.,a, .. . . n... .=. Total Delay 67,8 12,0 86.2 3.6 49 9 22.5 LOS .._...__ .. . . A .._ ;. .::, G..... ;. :... l Approach Delay 63.1 42j2 3G.3 Queue Length 50th(ft) 491 81 -383 81 21 0 Internal Link Dist(ft) 1889 2569 1440 • Base Capacity(vph) 8D9 775 651 1511 101 173 250 a V, 06,Cap l2e uelr�. .. . ... 0, . �1.., _.;:: , ......'`.. :.. : 4....-Ho .....0. 5pillback Cap Reductn 0 fl 0 fl 0 fl Reduced Wic Ratio 1.04 0.39 1.09 0.53 0,39 0.57 Area Type: Other yolaifing s5 s� ..... ... . ...: ........... Actuated Cycle Length.,.8.5 40. fiJaturE. ycle.f00. . . . ? Control Type Semi Act Uncoord .. '; Intersection Signal Delay 461 Intersection xLOS: D x!I aY t Sh I : ]�ter���, G�'ael Uh��etion 9Ek2 f0 .,. .....�.. . :::,.. .. Analysis Period(min)15 F :Volume sea` ct !�:gl?aria rs{ieGbpall}(fnt#nt Queue shorn is maximum after two cycles . 5th prcrrtiFe volurr►e exCr~eels,capi}y,_greue,mayfattger.,:,. ... ... Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. S lits and Phases: 2: INTERNATIONAL DRIVE&MNG STREET 12flA `s 1 iS2 03 i � _ � -.F+, nn y '�" k _.).' ,'�` a?d;�,rg �� .i•Y��:,4�'§° s� J, .,en Ir ..- � .:-r � YEAR 2019 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES -APPROVED PM 1: ANDERSON HILL ROAD & KING STREET 120A 402015 own Lane Configurations .....t:......... Ideal.Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 190D 1900 1900 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 07 Lane U111.Factor 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1,00 1.00 . .: .. Rt 0.850 0.850 Fltket o980 0;960 Satd.Flow(prot) 1719 1810 1810 1538 1719 1588 #tBSfl...... 2'. ;� ..... . . ;. .. : .;. .. .. ... Satd.Flog(perm) 112 1810 1610 1538 1682 1466 Bjg .Tum Satd Flaw(FRTOR) i ink Sped(rnpli} :.•...r5 : , ....... . Link Distance(ft) 1256 2649 2715 Gond,Peds (#Ihr) 10 10 10 10 � `z k°.I•opcF2ciiar. .... ..�.. . D96 .-;p:�8 14 96 .. ; Heavy Vehicles(°f°) 5% 5% 5°In 5% 5% 5°t° Atf} Elow(vphj ...... ..` . 1:59.. . ;;638- . .1;Q2T.. ;X77. . ...188. .. ..:81 B •. Sharod Lane Traffic{° ) ane, roupF .... P. }.._:. :.. .:59 :.... Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane,Alr�nMA nt' _.. ... . Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 . 0.... ..::.:� .., 8 3 ` Crosswalk Width(ft) 15 16 16 Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 100 1.0.0 1.00 �urningSpeed;{rnpfF)".... ....;,�.�. . '�:•. ,_.::. . ..... .... '.�. .... .'i�. .. .'9...f ... .. Number of Detectors 1 1 1 1 1 1 Leading Detector(1) 50 50 50 50 545D Tralhrig L1 ( d� D .. .... ..:: .... . :'; Detector 1 Positi.on(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 S€� 60 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex C3+Ex CI+Ex Ct+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex ttr 1 Cttantrei... _.... a . . ....... . Detector 1 Extend(5) 0,0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay(s) 0,0 0.0 0,0 DA 0,0 0!.0 TurrryRe P !1Pt. . ,: A. 1... Protected Phases 1 6 2 24 4 3 Detector Phase 1 6 2 24 4 4 & °Fh Minimum Initial(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 14001622A_PMBD_APPROVED OFFICE-280,000 S.F•-OPTIMIZATION Synchro 8 Report Page 1 YEAR 2019 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES -APPROVED PM 1: ANDERSON HILL ROAD & KING STREET 120A 012015 .. .......... f�inEmUtn Spkrt(s) 9,0 t3 0 91}... 0. Total Split(s) 9.0 7.4.0 65.0 2E•0 26.0 2q•0 Tokar Splti(°h}.. ' 715°l° 89:7°r° �v4;;2tik 2 ,7°h, 21TJa i7°�, . Maximum Gratin(s) 4,0 K0 60.0 21.0 21:0 18.0 .0... 4 0 ..... ,4 Q. All-Red Time(g) 1..0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0,0 L!,9. rime Total Lost Time 4,0 4,0 4.0 4.0.. 4 0 heaiiLag . ... : Leada9..... ;.fag. Lead-t,ag Opti:miza? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes ;3,00 .._..:. •, ._. :.,.:.: • .. - ._. .. . Recall lvldde Ncre Max Max None None None Flash Dont Walk(s) 11.0 '. .... . . .. ... . :' .., Act E fct Green(.s) 7Q 0 70.0 61.0 87,C 22.0 22.0 70 . , DE... .. AY' v/c Ratio 1,01 0.50 0.93 013 0.45 0.99 :2 ._ . .. ... . .,•, .. Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0,13 0,0 0 0 0.0 Total LOS F A C A D F App,< h Ci l y, Approach LOS C C E u199 L�rrgt Queue Length 95th eft) #186 238 #576 16 158 #379 irlt�,rriaLLmkDi ttft? ::::'11'7 . 2565„ ..2635. ...... Turn Bay Length(ft) 76 200 250 Gep�ct}y.{ _,..:. ... .. : 58. . ._1 . ... .i-Ilm 8._ .: � ....:. 2 .. ., . _. .... ....... . Starvation Cap Reduetn 0 0 (0{ 0 0 0 1 5pdtackafed� �•..:,_ ..,�._ r a,- Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 fl C ice¢ £ _ � �`.� n( �� �` s a •.. .', ,,.. .. �,._ c....r.: .. r. Cycle Length 120 Ac uatecf, yr a';Langfh IM Natural Cycle, 150 oniroi Type;fkctgaitl,,Uncoordiated Maximum W7,Ratio 11,011 Irtt �sfi��S�gnateiay 3ls 2....:.. ........ Intersection.Capacity.UtilizatiOrt 79.3% ICU Levet of 5ervioa D �Y teno .mirth,t :. , Volume exceeds capacity,queue is theeoreficail w y Enfimte cj ri maxi Llueue,sowl` ... .Wrrt•afier} rflcclas. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity,queue may be longer. Queue sfy'�4�tti rs criaxarnurn after t�ro�cyeles . � � .. " '< 14001622A_PMBD_APPROVED OFFICE-280,000 S•F.-OPTIMIZATION Synchro 8 Report Page 2 YEAR 201:9 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES - APPROVED PIS. 1: ANDERSON HILL ROAD & KING STREET 120A) 41812015 S !i!a and Phases, 1:ANDERSON HILL ROAD&KING STREET{120A,) 0) 1 02 *3 '704 1 14001622A_PMBD_APPROVED OFFICE-280,000 S.F.-OPTIMIZATION Synchro 8 Report Page 3 YEAR 2019 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES - APPROVED PM 2: INTERNATIONAL DRIVE & KING STREET 120A 4/8/2015 SLane Configurations 'y �} Q�f�" IQ Y QiI L, �U ,....'::.. ....:-:, ....ijQf ..... .:.`. ....._ .•1VY .,- 45�.... �JS7.Y.... .. .. ` Ideal Flaw(vphp1) 1900 1000 1900 1900 1900 1900 t4ge t ertgth{ ....... 2 .. . . .450 Z59........... ...... Storage Lanes 1 4 1 1 .. .... .. 255 ...... . ...4. .: .. Lane:Ufil•Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 Frt fl.$50 0.850 It Pk4. 5atd.FI¢w(Prot) 1810 1538 1719 1810 1719 1.638 Satd,Flaw(perm) 1810 1488 18.1 1810 1685 1487 I�h 1"urn an Red Vie; y. Said.Flew(RTOR) 211 t�rtk Speed.(mpt�}. 35 W. 90 . Link{Distance(ft} 1949 2649 1520 Trayel,T}m.6 . Confl.Peds,(Phe 10 10 10 10 Peek Hour FactorI$4 0: f. 4.... . :'•' ... . . .. Healy Vehicles(%) 5% 5% 5°/a 5% 59`0 6% Shared Lane Traffic Larl.etircatP.. (?�p �....J..... 9 .._..... ..: i. 4 .,.... .$ItI•, 25....._.; $t .._.. Enter Blocked Intersection NoNo No No No No �4e.A(t90merEt L t ig1t .. W1,. _:eft_•...R h..... • ;• Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 CrosSvualk Width(ft) 16 1616 Tura.Yy Left'f ;rrr Lane. : ... . :. ::a.. . ..:. .. ....... Headway Factor 1.00 1,00 100 1.00 1.00 1.00. Number of Detectors 0 0 1 0 1 1 Leading Detector lft) 0 0 50 0 60 50 T Detector-i' Positicn(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 rs t rs 7 J ' _... :'. e 50 50 iQ.. .. ., Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex C14-Ex C}+Ex CI*Ex Ct+Ex 0AV q 1 Channel .... 1. . . ['detector 1 Extend(s) 0.0 0.0 0 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 Dtegf 1•Qu ►ie-(sp.. :0 4•.. .. :0.Q 0 0.. ..- .';0 0....... _D... . Detector 1 Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 G.0 0.0 Turn Type - :: NR pmo . .prrr�pt Protec'ted�Phases. 2 3 ff1 6 3 ertrlttfed ?h&des •. i s..;: :.. ....,_'...Y .,. r.. ••_ ...... Detector Phase: 2 3 1 6 3 3 Minimum Initial(3) 5.0 3.0 4.0 3.0 3.Q 3.0 14001622A._PMBD,_APPROVED OFFICE-280,000 S.F.-OPTIMIZATION Synchro 8 Report Page 4 YEAR 2010 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES -APPROVED PM 2: INTERNATIONAL DRIVE& KING STREET 120A 402015 Nir�irYiuh 'P'ft,(S) Total Split(s) 40:0 36.0 10,0 50.0 35,0 35,0 i tat:S.)rt `Yv 47;1°fa 41;:2°/°. :;,1,- °� 58;8°!0 41.:2%0 T.,..... .p { Maximuri Green(sl 34.0 30.0 4.0 44.3 30.0. 30.,0 T. AI{-Red Tree(s) 1'.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1:4. .. ... .... . . ;Cosi Ti(n A ...... s} . Total.Lost Time(s3 5:0 4.Q 5.0 5.0 4,0 4.0 i Lead-Lag Cptlmiae? Yes Yes Recall Mode Max None Max None None ply F�` (Jy�j{y�' 1^' fj a Artua:ted g/C Ratio 0.41 0.79 0.53 0.53 0.36 0336 vj 'Ri3tlo . .. . 9: 4 J;02, .. ..: Qortrol Delay. 46.7 . 1,4 39.7. .27.4. ...23.18.. 60,9 Total Delay 46.7 1.4 .39.7 .27.4 .231 80.9 QS �........ A . ..... C . ....:::�.w Approach Delay 410 29 3 49.8 ° �s .. . . .... _ ...�.. ....:. �. � . .' . .. Qveue Length 50th(ti) 348 4 37 347 110 297 apeurLeng ;95tfr. �. Irtemal Link Dist(ft) 1869 2569 1440 125q .. . . . . . . Base Capacity{vph) 745 1196 186 958 626 676 taFvaton G1?R uctn. . .. ... . ... . . ..Q. .. t3. ..... 0 �,. ... ...: :_... . .:' . .. ...: Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Q D .51 al , !� . .... �... : .; ;: .. .: 0 .__�4 ........ . ... . Reduced :..... ,'.. .. .. v1e Ratio 0;94 €G,05 0,76 0,85 0.47 1.42. Area Type. Other Py _r Actuated Cycle.Length:9 MRr .. .... ...,. .. Control Type.,Semi Art Uncoord mvr um.v,1.0,; Intersection Signal Delay:40.6 Intersection LOS D In .rtion G2paettyUirflzatipt7�� °k , .... .';': . 1G[1:G$3el.crF.Serle�, ...... Analysis Period(min)15 Vofrlrne,exs ; aerty,gfee fs theorti 'allnrtlt ...._:... ..._r_ y ; Queue shown is maximurr after two cycles, #,.. 5tl�,peranfiilecalpm exceedsaFlfy, �e >rma' `Jelonger�.':..,z_ Queue shown is maximum atter two cycles., S lits and Phases: 2: INTERNATIONAL DRIVE&KING STREET 120A 'p1 02ift 3. rJ 533 .c: k' ¢'- ..fir. -,..:, YEAR 2019 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES - PROPOSED AM 1: ANDERSON HILL ROAD & KING STREET 120A 4/812015 mill Lane Configurations ' t t r v'olum'e(vpin) - X63 X44. Ideal Fkm(vphpl) 1,900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 .. �. boat ,.. . =_ .. . ... Storage Lanes 2 .......25.. ... . ... Larne Util.Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.04 WIN bac#af. . . Frt 0.850 0.850 Fly PrdtectEd 1719 181 Flow ... . .. 5atd. .. ...':. . . '. . .' {prot) 0 1810 1538 1719 1538 Fl#P.errrnid :q•:1$l s: . Satd. Flow(perm) 338 1810 1890 1538 1671 1451 N . f,,IgkJ.4'm an. ed. :.'. :. .... . Na.... . Satd.Flaw{RTDR} 30.. ....: ... .. Link Diatonce(ft) 1256 2649 2715 04 Conti Peds (df)hr) 10 1Q 10 10 P'e..ak dour FeCtr, . . ti94. 0194 0'194 :U:;94 Oa4 .0.94 Heavy Vehicles{°1°} 5% 5% 5% 5°/° 5% 5% 81.0]..F(ov..{vph);;; .._.•... fan. , � 8. : t :. ��.. . .. . . Shored.Lane Traffic %} bane t`ou Flow NP.) .. :28(3 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No. No No No Lana i ligpmeni f Bft ... Leit. ..,. fi Median Wtdth(tt) 92 12 12 Crosswalk 1NidthM) 16 16 16 Tw€ vay Lef, urn ane.,.', _... �...u: - f Headway Factor 1,00 1.00 1.00 1 00 1.00 1 00 Number of Datectors 1 4 1 1 1 1 Detggtq 19mpfld Leading Detector{ } ff 50 50 50 50 50 50 FraNlr 'Detctvr(t}. . .....' 4. #}.. .. . tl..... .': 0......:.. ... .. Detector 1 Position{ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 a,$tf f rIzet),..... .. ::..; 0 ..... 5 ..._..._' ...... . , .... 505..0._. . ;.... . . Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex C.I+Ex CI+Ex Ci+Ex CI+Ex Defter 1han�i .< `........ ..... Detector 1 Extend(5) 0.0 0,13 0.0 0 0 0,0 0.0 .. .. r�.. . .!:0, ..... .... 0;... Detector 1 Delay{s) 0.0 0.0 0 44 0 0.0 0,0 Tui Type ..- Rnrpt ..:;: A tfioy... .':Prod.. :P :, N# �L :.. .p.:- Protected Phases 1 6 2 24 4 3 Detector Phase 1 6 2 24 4 4 5,yn!€Ilt Phase.., Minimum Initial(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.D 4.0. 4.0 14001622A_AMBD_PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL-110 HOMES-OPTIMIZATION Synchro 8 Report Page 1 YEAR 2019 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES - PROPOSED AM 1: ANDERSON HILL ROAD & KING STREET 120A 4/8015 Totak Split(s) 19.0 80,0 51.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 a 15.8°fo 66;-7 50;3°!u Maximum Green�s) 14.0 75 0 56.0 15.0 15.0 18.0 Y. Ti Gma 4 ;a a . All-Red Time(s) 1.0 I'D 1.0 1'0 1.0 a.0 t.. ... :;1 -: .D ..... . . Total Last Ttme{s) 4.0 4,0 4.0 4.0 4,0: Lead�Lag I-ea Log ._ a9... . .�a8 ..t ad... Lead-t-ag(Optimize? Yes YesYes Yes Yes Ir 'hi1l'r Exte►�§19f1. ). .. ff D. ...,. 0 ........: _ .... : ... Recall Mode Nore Max Max None None Now A. >iKisr,e,{8 . Y Flash Dant Walk(s) 11.0 R Act Eflct Green(s) 76,0 76.0 57.4 77,0 16,6 15.6 fl:76 q 76 : .0:58 ...4 :771S. . . vlc Ratio 0,61 :0.78 0.73 0.16 0.75 0.67 cr)tgdl: el`�€'� ;. f 13 ..... 9 $. . •2{?9. . .:: :3 4. .... $4 55 4 . . .. .. Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0;0 0.0 0,0 0.0 684- 6 LOS 3 B C A E E G Approach LOS B B E ( 11 u$; g#li. th(-fl ..,V. '4 . . . ... :X37 .: ..,: 5._.. .':i' 24 �3i ...... Queue Length 95th(ft) 100 539 493 47 #227 #176 Turn Bay Length(ft) 75 200 250 Bqe, apactiy(fpr!) . ... 486 138f . :1 Q42 .. X194. 276. `23 ..... . . .. Starvation Cap Reductn 0 '0 0 0 0 a Rlbk GdQ�in (� t Storage Cap Reduatn 0 0 0 0 g- 4, 9 Cycle Length 120 TU rm r MA ORycl '_ Natural Cycle 90 ritrTyperActuafctl„4JriordEa '�i.. Maxim urn vlc Ratio:0.79 inlia a Eiarrti IgOaI 1,: ! p: ... ... 10.0rsect�on L 7S B Intersection Capacity Utilization 721% IGII Level of Service C Ah��yr� Penc (rtlm} Y s.. •.;.: �...... # 96th pereentlle volume exceeds capacity,queue may be longer, Que�re shovar�I ., at num der fro.nc[e ..... Splits and Phases: 1:ANDERSON HILL ROAD&KING STREET(1 A �. a .t-. •�g,.a t ,!".�,`2 SKY :. "�F��'i�,Y�rj:3 �4:5 "T� 4 h � �, q 6 �.'h;2'wN•:YR�.^y"^�"}`: YEAR 2019 BUILD TRAF'F'IC VOLUMES — PROPOSED AM 2: INTERNATIONAL DRIVE & KING STREET (120A) 41812015 Lane Configurations ... ': 7. ... ..72 J?t . . ...70 .... . Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1:900 190D 190D 1900 1900 $04g Length=( }.. ... =' 25. . . .. k ... 5{}..... .. . . . Storage Lares 1 1 1 1 Tar)anD ( }. .. . ..... .... :.. . 25 . .. Lane UJI.Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 100 f ;irrl[e Facer; #}..9.7 1;0 ..-. ...,:.. ;D .....D.t�' .... : . .. Frt 0,850 0..850 FIt.Protecte Satd.Flow(prvft) 1810 1538 1719 .11.810 1719 1538 eft P�rr��tdd ...; .... �:-:. . ...��...... ft•�83 '; Q:�54...... . Satd.Flow(perm) 1810 1494 168 1810 1:573 1379 f.,§hf um an Red o; YeS.:a Satd Flow(RTOR) 120 Lmft Spead(mptl) . ... . . . 3q ..... Link Distance(ft) 1049 2649 1521 Confl Peds (41hr) 10 1D 10 1D 90 _...(3: 4... ....Q,. Q .......' Heavy Vehicles{°/o) 5°/A 5% 5% 5% Shared Lana Traffic(%) Enter Elfooked 6ntersection No No No No No No Median Width{ft} 1.2 12 12 D..... . ; .I)... .' ... ..... :. . . Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Headway f=actor 1 00 9 DD 1.00 1,00 1.00 10D TOk: ... ..: Number of Detectors 0 0 1 0 1 1 o OTam _plata. ..:. - :: .. .. Leading DetectOT(ft) 0 0 50 0 50 50 Treilirg Iat` ��tpt�(it).... .`: 0o Detector 1 P091t M(ft) 0 0 D 0 0 D WL ltetri31 Slet . .: ..: . a0. - ....... :, - ... , Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex Ci+Ex Clx CI+Ex CI+Ex NO'Pii Detector 1 Extend(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 ................. Detector 1 Delay(s) 0.0 0 0 0 0 0..0, a s OO Curtk n fsfr pm 'P1TMR `' �lV .;•,K Prot . 'e .:.r_....,... �• Protected Phases 2 3 1 fi .3 P (mtEed f�hases � Detector Phase 2 3 1 6 3 3 S' thPhas ...' . ,. . Minimum Initial(s) 5.0 3.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 14001622A_AMSq_PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL-110 HOMES-OPTIMIZATION Synchro 8 Report Page 3 YEAR 2019 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES - PROPOSED AM 2: INTERNATIONAL DRIVE & KING STREET Q20A4/8/2015 Mtnarntarilplt (s ... . 0.. .. ...3 Q, 1; 4 ....., 0........ . Total split(s) 49.0 9,0 27.0 76.0 9.0 90 Totafapllt(�fa) 576°/ 1t) 0 318°l0 $9;4 0. 1{� 4 .1016 . .. i a ' Maximum Green(s) 43 0 4 0 21.0 70.0 4.0 4.0 ...... . . .. .. ....: . All Red Time(s) 1,0 1.0 1 0 1,D 10 1.0 dost nrn� dtust,$) .... . . . :, ' . ... . o . .::: _....,: .::.'t ... ... . :. Total Lost Time(s) 6.0 4.0 5:0 5,0 4,0 4.0 dead..... . : :. . ... I.eadlLag . .. ....� ...:. . . . .:... .. .... ...... . . Lead Lag Optlmlze? Yes `des 11eh3 � �� . . ....... _c .......... ��lte.a;sit�a(s1.... .:: ..... .:4� .. .. fig. . � Recall Mode Max None None Max None None 56 0. ..TI 0 Actuated gVC Ratio 0.52 a 59 0 84 0.134 He 0.06 x,48... flat Control Delay 33.2 7.6 55.0 3.6 5 '3 22.9 que'3eray:.. Total Detay 33.2 7.6 55.0 3.6 54.9 22.9 Approach Delay 27.9 23.8 321 � Queue Length 50th(fl) 382 45, 215 81 25 0 POW en the 5th,flfi395. ' . .. . 25�s... 0. ,.,��.,.. g......,. �.�. . Internal link Dist!(1) 1569 2569 1440 Ttt _ . Bwe Capacity(vph) 936 8a1 541 9511 101 194 5pilllaack Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced vto Ratio 0:90 0,25 0.96 0.53 0,48 0,e2 'Jill 11111111111111,11111 1�1111 Area Type Other Actuated Cycle Length 85 > aturt Cycle } . Con#roi 7)+pe Semi Act Lln000rd ..... .... Intersection Signal Delay.26.0 Intersection LOS C K a . lntere ( n,.Capc�}`.tfttlt?ataon:80 9°1¢ ICI Leve]of 5ervlce Analysts Period(min) 15 . :. #1 95th pereertle 1+olii t e exceeds capac)y,.tlueue may be IQnge .- . ... . Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. jtt5 and Phases: 2: INTERNATIONAL DRIVE&KING STREET .120A jyyE.�{ 14001622A AMB�_PROPOSED RESICENTIAL-110 HOMES OPTIMIZATION Synchro 8 Report Page 4 YEAR 2019 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES- PROPOSED PM. 1: ANDERSON HILL ROAD & KING STREET 120A? 418/2015 Lane Configurations + *t Y4prr<e,lvptj .. 2c1... .. X48 Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 �""b k14erlgth(ft) .. ....:.. :: 5. . .. - 200 ..... 250 .. ..... .. Storage Lames t 1 1 1 pArt Lane Uti,l,Factor 1.DO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0,850 0,850 It ;oeteiara ,. .. Satd.Flaw(prat) 1719 1810 1810 1538 1719 1538 ......,5t3 ... 10 Satd:Flow(perm) 188 181Q 1810 1536 1686 1471 5atd.Flow(RTOR) Linl�Sp sedmpg} 35. 35 Link Distance(ft) 1256 2649 2715 Tr v44, ConfL Peds.�#!hr) 10 10 10 10 Pak,.Hour Factor...:... . Q.9 4,$6,......#196........0 9th..... .0, fi ..:.:€�96.... . Heavy Vehicles("/0) 5%Q 5% 5% 510 5% 6% Im Shared Lane Traffic(%) Enter Blocked Intersection No No No . No No No Lana! ignrriertt :Gel , eft> [fit.... '119�l ...,,;Lg Right.. ...... _._._ ........, Wo.dian Width(ft) 12 12 12 0 .. .....: . ... ... .. ...... :. .. ...... ._ :.... .... Off Crosswalk Wtdth(ft) 16 16 16 tinHeedway Factor. 1 00 1.00 1.00 10 1,00 1 00 Turning Spse,�(._p�7. .= Number of Detectorsilk 1 1 1 1 1 1 - Leading Detector(ft) 50 50 ry r 50 50 X60 50 . .. . 0, D .._:.....0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Type C1+Ex GI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Ct+Ex Ci+Ex Detector 1 Extend(s) 0.0 0.0 010 0,0 0.0 0.0 p : od iueue..(e7. .2 .. ,.. t,r3........ 0 .. ...: Detector 1 Delay(s) 0 0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0 0 +P :, . >.: � ..: Protected Phases 1 6 2. 24 4 3 8 P��jrr►�ttedf;'��es ._.....�.... .. �.:... �. :.. ._.,.:.. ....:.:._...... ......... ,4, .� ......: ........ .', _, .. ..- . . . . . . Detector Phase 1 6 2 24 4 4 Minimum Initial(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4,0 4.0 4.0 14001622A_PMBD_PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL-110 HOMES-OPTIMIZATION Synchro 8 Report Page 1 YEAR 2019 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES - PROPOSED PM 1: ANDERSON HILL ROAD & KING STREET 120A) 41e12015 MlnJrrrut..Spl1t,(..s} Total 5p1it(s} 10.0 71.0 61.0 29 0 29 D 20.0 Totat.5 Ilt °fa ..$,3°a„ 9'Zn1a 5t3&°l042°f: X42%........'17° .. . Maximum Green(s) 5.0 86.0 56.0 24.0 24-0 . 138.0 Ali-Red Time(s) 1,0 10 1.0 1.0 10 G.0 61n 'A 5.(s} Totdl Last Time(s) 4,0 4.0 4.0 4:0 4,0 t eadlLag Leed�Lag Optimize? Yes Yes yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None Niax flax None None gone : Flash Dont Walk(s) 11.0 O'iesfrratl,Cels #mr), Act Effct Green(s) 67.0 67.0: 57,3 8fi 0 25,-0 25.0 We Rafo 0.73 8.54 0.86 0.12 0.40 0,87 Guntr€al t3alay '30.4 15. ......2 '# .. ::_1 ... ... . . : .3 Queue Delay D:0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.. ;;10 Tal�ai E?elay 3U 4 LOS C i C A C E .. .. .. ...... �RFroach Caefay `` Approach LOS6 >✓ D 1Geuelengt _50th. }... r.,:3 . .... $ti..,..� `.., ..... Queue Length 95th A #81 276 #734 16 153 #348 Turas Bay Length(ft) 76 ry 2000y A2.550y y Starvation Gap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Oil94SpillbcicCaptut y/�J }y�, .... - ........ .:. .. . . . .u..r... .. . -J",.n ..... ...,...�. ,.. .._..... ^..r...�... .......k 1 ..^. M1i...........fY ] .:•.. .. Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Aria . ... :. ,.., Cycle Length 120 A��rat�d C3�e t,.en9�h.:.�0�s. ,-> ...:: ...:....r ....... ... ... .... ...... . , - ...... ... ... .. . ... . .. ...._-... .. .... Nat}urr(a[ll Cycle 130 Maximum vfc Ratio:0.97 Intersection Capacity Utilization 72.50!0 ICU Level of Service C # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity,queue maybe longer. Queue�ho4titt%maz'mm,-, -0 a les lits and Phases: 1:ANDERSON HILL ROAD&KING STRI ET 120A tea, 1 fb" 04 ^ � �,_a,;�. �`��.rkl,-_.,- ,&. �. r' .ti'w .."-o-.�#" ...`:t;..s "•� �. Opp. b ->. '-_:.,v.,. � -.- .�•�v,�y,«���W.uca�»« ;.�s...'� ,xz.�^.yxa,'�:��.�.,�.,�..,�wwr:�. :`.�s:,a..'�'� - _. -. YEAR 2019 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES - PROPOSED PM 2: INTERNATIONAL DRIVE & KING STREET 120A 418/2015 Boom 111101 Lane Configurations ` ..;:; . .:.: .. .. Ideal Flow(vphp1) 1900 1900 1900 1500 1900 1900 .. ....,., Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 ,Ta r; f1 . 25 . .. 25 ... ..'` .. Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1:00 1,00 Frt 0,860 0.850 )f#�rteaied ...._.. D950 ... 6stl.. ._ ....:<.._ Satd Flow(prot) 1610 1538 1719 1810 1719 1538 VE ,:. . . .. ., .. _Q Satd,Flow(perm) 1810 1456 330 1810 1689 1481 Rrt Turn o0.Rei hit. .. .. Satd, Flow(RTOR) 243 Link Distance(it) 1949 2849 1520 ..... .....3 ,5, . Confi Psds (4/hr) 10 10 10 10 ......0, 4 .... B . 4 Heavy Vehicles(°fQ) 5% 5% 5% 5110. 5% 5%Y,NY qr (� g (]', 111,. t {YR _ _. Shared Lane Trattie(/a) LaeG ,: X98 74, $ 89 .:> : C? _ ._.._..... X1,8, '� Enter Blooked Intersection No N4 No No No No. Median Wldtlj A) 12 12 12 ME Crosswalk Width ftO 16 16 16 T4VA UVdy tTUfrre.. Headway Factor 1 00 1 DD 1 00 1 00 1.00 1.00 Tt.rriingStelilR�. .._.:a _...... .: 1 Number of Detectors 0 0 1 0 1 1 Leading Detector(ft) 0 0 50 0 50 50 ' �ra�ii ete ter tk � � _ ... : . . .._.. ,...:. ,.. . . , Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 a 0 a 0 0 Detector 1 Type Gl+Ex CI+Ex Ci+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Extend".L�. ... � .:._ .... . ._. . , , � �_... - .. ..� _.. .. . � (s) 00 0.0 00 00 00 00 Detector 1 Delay(s) 0.0 0 0 0,0 0,0 D.0 0.0 Turrr,Ta .. y... PIP#. ...� ._.... Prnk.._...P�rrn... .; - _,..,.. Protected Phas es 2 3 1 6 3 P Detector Phase 2 3 1 6 3 S 0ti}it �i Phase3 Minimum Initial(s). 5:0 3.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 14001622A_PIVIBD PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL-110 HOMES-OPTIMIZATION Synchro 8 Report Page 3 YEAR 2019 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES - PROPOSED PM 2- INTERNATIONAL DRIVE & KING STREET, 12.0A 402015 ;1 .. 10....... 9iti ,..:`: _.d. _ ..•«. .. Total Split(a) 47.0 28.0 10.0 57.0 +�28.0 Za 0 ;8_0 Maximum Maximum Green(s) 410 23.0 4.0 510 23.0 23.0 (sj .. 40........ Q. 1 All Red Time(s) 0 1.0 1.0 1.0 I'D 10 I fist Tine Total Lost Time(s) 5.0 4,0 5.0 6.0 4,0 4.0 . Lead-Lag Optim�ae7 Yes `fes Vehtc> Recall Mo ' Max None None flax gone None E,�fferans) _... .:,; :4 9 64 ... -:52 7 . ..21 •...Z9 1.1.... Actuated g1C Ra 10 0.51 0.76 0:63 0.53 0.26 0.26 6. of Rtl� ... ._:.... . Control Delay 23.4 1,4 14.1 151 30,13 36 9 9 0i belay Total Delay 23.4 1.4 14.1 151 30.0 36,9 . in ...::. .. ... . Ci ., ._. ... �; Approach Delay 21.4 14.9 ?4.8 LOEM s: ..... .., . ,.' e.. Queue Length 50th(fl) 2.92 4 33 275 95 138 € Geuei engin th...� '= `3Bq 8 .. .,_a4 ....:;X65 .. 18 - 27 Irternai Link Dist(ft) 9869 2569 1440 •turn,�ayLengiii.(�t.. . ..' ....... :.:.. ...:325, .:�� 25A ��.. ...._.r `: . . . ... ._:. .....:�: ...... ... .. Base Capa(fAy(vph) 926 1235 293 i 146 502 608 O rvaon dap„Rasuctn . . . . .:; .... .::_ .... �..... tl.-..... Spillback Gap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 1Reduced vJc.Ratio 0,76 [1.0 0.54 0.71 4.43 0.64 Area Type, Other yrle'f:�>�g S Actuated Cycle Length:82.3 Control.Type.Semi Act-Uncoord lfrrr ft 1 atl intersection Signal Delay 22.8 Intersection LOS: }C0.�� (I k H'•k!/ �. �I�I�LBU81�1�7Gf M�VG�:�..... ... ;. ...; ...:, Analysis Period(min)15 ...95#. .ft4110'," dame eacc ads vaPacfty�4uaue r Oft Queue shown is maximum after two cycles SplLs and Phases: 2; INTERNATIONAL.DRIVE&KING STREET f1,A, 1 -r. .l✓ y - e�m�` '"p3,y y'f IW ,R"«"' •p r tt,F,' i '�'' a^�f, - `2�-i' • :.n.�' w ` ..eye•.,. _t?�.,; k,:�S+x..--. -. _. N 14001622A_�PMB�WPROPOSED RESIDENTIAL-110 HOME5-OPTIMIZATION 5ynchro S Report Page 4 Traffic Impact Study Suri Homes at Reekson Executive Park MASEK MC Project No.: 14001622A Appendix _ �'�-.p.: �:::WI�Cwcatt�n�ks�inrc�� -4�.-.-"w`n.�'- _ %�i!s�ww'.::k:�'.t`.�.nwans�s�gWBf.-..M..�S4 "t-vwaE±�ux'ta9•`f±r r SUN HOMES A T RECKSON EXE CUTI VE PARK APPENDIX E COUNT DATA Maser Consulting 11 Bradhurst Avenue Hawthorne, NY 1052 Custofne,,r Loyalty f raClient SatisfactiGn File Name : NYS-Route_120A(King_St) At_Anderson_Hill_Rd^197484_11-13-2014 Site Code Start Date : 1111312014 Page No : 1 Groups Printed-Lights,-Buses-_Trucks Southbound SL hlorthbou' 5t, Eastbound St. From_h3q.rth .. ..-....ry ..,.._.,. _. From South : . ._ .. _ -- -; . ig 4... From W est t2rt'� rp Right: ThruU-Turn - .:... U Turn .. �rTaf" Left U-Turn App.Total Int,Total 01-00 f4:M 18 86 0 104 119 12 6 134, 8 1 0 19 254 ;1 AM 25 137 0 162 '136 14 0 150 16 16 0 32 344 07,30 AM 16 131 0 147 159 18 0 177 27 30 0 57 389 07; 5#lfui; 20 125 0 145 209 2.7 " D 236.; 29 36 0 65 446 TOM 79 479 0 558 623 71 D _ 694. 80 93 0 173 1425 08:40 AM 22 159 0 191 ; 145 33 0 1778 28 23 0 51 420 08:15 AM' 28 150 0 178 147 43 0 190 33 29 0 62' 430 08:30 AM' 16 101 0 117: 151 30 0 181 : 25 28 0 53 351 08:45 AM 14 115 0 1.29 137 24 0 161 : 16 40 0 56 346 Total 80 535 0 615 : 580 130 0 710 102 120 0 222 1547 09:00 AIM+ 20 89 0 109 27 23 0 150` 16 24 0 40 299 09:15 AM` 17 85 0 102 84 11 0 95 23 22 0 45 242 Grand Total 196 1188 0 1384 1414 235 0 1649 221 259 0 480 3513 Apprch% 14.2 85.8 0 85.7 14.3 0 46 54 0 Total o Lights 167 100 0 1267 30 2 4 2 0 536 95 220 0 415' 3218 %Lights. _0 _. .. 85e2 92.,.6 0._ .. 91-5.- -.---92.9 94.5.. Q. . �,#3. _� : .._.._...88.2 84.9 :- 0 Huses 19 54 0 73 55 2 6 47 5 23 0 '' 28 I[86-1591.6 56 °7a Bases $,7 4.5 0 5.3 - .3.9 _.. .D.9 _ 3_5 . ._,..._.2.3-_ .:- -8.9 - 0 5.8.Ir 4.5 Trucks 10 34 8 44 6 137 45 11 0 56 21 16 D 37I %Trucks 5.1 2:9 0 3.2 3.2 4.7 0 3.4 9.5 6.2 0 T71 3.9 Southbound St Njbdhboa nd.St. Eastbound St. >✓rorn.North r-IM.€sautp From West . Start Time Right Thru [ U Tum.'. _ APp,'rt�tta3; Thrq.' L (12r-rn APP.Total night i Left U-'Cure! App.Total' Int.Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 06:30 PM-Peak 1 of 1 Peak}lour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:30 AM =30 AM 16 131 0 147` 15S 18 0 177; 27 30 0 57 381 tt .45AM 20 125 0 145 : 209 27 D 236; 29 36 0 65 446 65-00 AM. 22 169 0 191 145 33 0 178 r 28 23 0 51 420 08 95;M 28 150 0 178 147 43 0_ 190' 33, 29 0 62 430 Tota Vcs9umig 86 575 0 661 660 121 0 781 1 117 118 p 235 1677 .T1. 13 87 ... 0 84.5 15.5 D 49.8 50.2 0 t=HF. ,76-8.. .851 Op_ $65 r..._ .789_ .703. 000, .827:_ 886. _819 .4fl0. .904. 940 Maser Consulting 11 Bradhurst Avenin Hawthorne, NY 1052 Customer Loyalty through Client Satisfaction File Name : NYS-Route_120A(King_St)_At Anderson-Hill_Rd 197484 11-13-2014 Site Code '� Start Date : 11/1312014 Page No ° 1 Groups Printed-Lights-Buses-Trucks Southbound St. i Northbound St. Eastbound St, From NO_rth Ft ssl, q tt From West Start Time: Right-;_ Thru U-Turn - App.Total Thr&i€ . l U-Tani. _ App.Tcta1 Mgbt Left E U-Turn---_ App.Tata! Int.Total 04'00 PM, 29 168 0 197 99 40 0 139 35 23 0 58 394 04:15 PM 21 149 0 170 137 34 0 171 36 19 0 55 396 04-30 PIMI 24 153 0 177 104 34 D 138` 43 21 0 64: 379 04.45 PM 30 146 0 170 106 41 0 147 19 14 a 33 356 Total 104 616 0 720 446 149 0 595 133 77 0 210 9525 05:00 PM 19 149 0 168 124 43 D 167 30 26 0 56 391 05:15 PM 26 131 0 1:57 158 24 0 182 35 23 0 58 397 05:30 Pf41 22 139 0 16.1 112 32 3 144. 41 18 0 59 364 05:45 PM 18 132 0t: {3, 110 37 0 147 56 15 Q 71 368 Total 85 551 0 636. 504 136 0 640 162 82 0 244 1520 06:00 PM 22 169 0 191 91 30 0 121 65 23 0 88 404 06:15 PM 17 99 0 116 85 38 0 123 62 23 0 85 324 Grand Total 228 1435 0 1663: 1126 353 0 4479 422 205 0 627 3769 Apprch% 13.7 66,3 0 76.1 23.9 0 67.3 32.7 0 Total% 6 38.1 0 44.1; 29.9 9,,4 0 39.2, 11-2 5..4 0 16.6 Lights; 214 1412 0 1626; 1099 343 0 1442: 413 196 6 509 3677 °!o Lights!.--- _ .93.9.--_ -- 98.4 0 973$; 9776_ 97.2... . - _. _0. ..,97-5; 97:9 _ -95.6 0 97.1 97-6 Buses; 3 7 0 10; 12 2 0 14 3 4 0 7` 31 %Buses 1.3 01.5 0 _ 0-6 11.1 05 ...... 0 0.9- - 0,7 2 -0 1..1.,. 0.8 Trucks 11 16 0 27 15 8 0 23; 6 5 0 11 61 %Trucks 4.8 1.1 fl 1.6; 113 2.3 0 1.61 1.4 2.4 0 1.8 1,6 Southbound St. Northbound St. Eastbound St. From North _- From South From West Start Time Right, Thru_i U-Turn App,Total. Thru Left U-Turns ; App.Total I iit` Left! U-Turn; App,T©tal; Int.Total Peek Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 06:15 PM-Peak 1 6f,f Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at:05:1 P 05:15 PIUI: 26 131 0 187' 158 24 0 182 j 35 23 0 58: 397 05:30 PM'• 22 139 0 f61 112 32 0 144 41 18 0 59 ; 364 05:45 PM 18 132 6 150.5110 37 0 147 56 15 0 71 368 06:04 PM 22 t69 G 1:9191 30. Q 121 ; 65 23 0 SS ; 400 Total Volume 88 571 1 6.% 471 123 0 594; 197 79 0 276 1528 %App.Total. 13.4. W,6 0 _ .79.3 2p.7 0 71.4 28.6 0 PHF 84Q.. 848_. -- .OW _663 .74-5 .831. .000 ;816 _ 758 .859 000 7 a 956 Maser Consulting 11 Bradhurst Avenue Hawthorne, NY 1052 tits'ri r Loyalty throtqh Glick-7t Saff.!;Mction File Name : NYS-Route_120A(King_St) At_internationa! Dr 197478 11-13-2014 Site Code Start Date : 1111312014 Page No : 1 Groups Printed-Lights-Buses-Trucks Southbound St. Northbound St. astbourrd St, From North Pillar 3wzh From Vilest Start Time Right Thru ; U-Turn Rip-Total: Thru ? Lett U-urn App,Total Right Left; L�Turr Alp,Total Int.Total 07700 AM 7 86 0 .93 117 7 a 124 3 2 0 5 222 07:15 AM 7 147 0 154- 124 21 Q 145 4 1 0 5 304 07:30 AM. 6 127 0 133: 164 19. 0 `t83 3 0 0 3 319 07:45 AM 9 130 0 139- 196 32 t 228, 3 0 0 3 370 Total: 29 490 Q 519601 79 0 680 13 3 0 16 1215 08:00 AM 14 193 0 207; 153 33 0 186 5 1 0 6 399 08:15 AM: 17 159 0 1761 136 28 0 164 0 1 0 1 341 08:30 AM 8 104 0 112: 125 48 0 173 4 1 0 5 290 08:45 AM. 30 116 9 146j 129 48 0 177 3 3 0 E 329 Total: 69 572 0 641 : 543 157 0 700 12 6 0 is 1359 09:00 AM 24 95 0 119 108 34 0 142; 5 2 0 7 268 09:15 AM 9 92 0 101 86 30 0 116 5 3 0 8 225 Grand Total 131 1249 0 1380' 1338 300 0 1638 35 14 0 49 3067 Apprch% 9.5 90.5 0 81.7 18.3 0 71.4 28.6 0 Total% 4.3 40.7 0 45 43.6 9.8 0 53.4 1.1 0-5 0 1.6 Lights 130 1140 0 1270 1219 294 0 1513 29 11 0 417 2823 %Lights 99,2 9113 0 92., . 91.1 98 0 WA 82.9 78.6 0 81.6' 92 Buses 0 73 0 73 79 3 0 82 3 3 0 6 161 0 5,8 0 5A, 5.9 1 . 0- 5' 8.6. 21,4 0 12.2 5.2 611695 Trucks 1 36 6 37' 40 3 0 43 3 0 0 %Trucks. 0:8 2.9 0 2.7 3 1 0 2.6 8.6 0 0 6.1 2.7 Southbound St. Northbound 5t, Eastbound St_ - From North. From South From West Start Time Hight Thfu U -Turn App.Total; Thru I l efl U-Turn App.Total Right! Left j U-Turn App.Total Int Total' Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 09:15 AM-Peak 1 of i Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:30 AM 07:30 AM 6 127 0 133 164 19 0 183 3 0 0 3' 319 07:45 AM 9 130 0 139 196 3i 0 228 3 0 0 3 370 08:00 AM. 14 193 0 207: 153 33 186 5 1 0 6 399 08:15 AM, 17 159 0 176 136 i8 9 164. 0 1 0 1 = 341 Total Volume 46 609 0 655; 649 112 0. 761 11 2 0 131 1429 %App,Total, 7 93 0 85.3 1:4<7 6 84.6 15.4 0 PHF .676 -789 .000_ 791 .826. . $4 ,W0 .834 ,550 .500 .000 .542 895 Maser Consulting 11 Bradhurst Avenue Hawthorne, NY 1052 Customer Lt�hr t ro Client tisf ti ,ri File Name : NYS-Route_120A(King_St) At_lnternational Dr_197478 11-13-2014 Site Code Start Date : 1111312014 Page No : 1 Groups Printed-Ug6%,But-Trucks Southbound St. Nb ttabotn*d$t a i&rsun t. Oo Start PM Right 1�r1 m North rp'i' - f re t+`ci €P1 .. . iprti West 9 _ App.Total_ Left t;t-Tum _ App.Total l R19� Le Tugs App.Totat; Int.Total 172 114 3 4 117 11 t1 1a 307 0415 PM 1 150 0 151 k 142 2 0 144 14 6 U 19 314 04:30 PM 0 156 0 156` 120 3 0 123' 17 22 301 04:45 PM 5 136 0 141 ` 107 2 0 109 i 27 1s r0 40' 290 Total 7 613 0 620 483 10 0 493: 69 30. 0 99 1212 05:00 PM 0 135 0 135 118 1 0 119 44 22 0 66 320 0515 PM 1 121 0 122. 216 4 1 221 38 10 0 48 391 05:30 PM 0 130 0 130 123 2 0 125 38 19 0 57 312 05:45 PM 3 130 0 133 115 3 0 118, 22 3 0 31 282 Total 4 516 0 520: 572 10 1 583 142 60 0 202 1305 06:00 PM 0 148 fl 148 95 4 0 99 28 10 0 38 285 06:15 PM. 0 107 0 107 99 4 0 103: 15 5 0 20 230 Grand Total 11 1384 0 1395. 1249 28 1 1278 254 105 0 359 3032 Apprch% 0.8 99.2 0 97.7 2.2 0.1 70.8 29.2 0 Total% 0,4 45.6 046' 41,..2 0,9 0 42„2 8.4 3.5 0 11.S Lights 8 13$9 0 1367: 1225 27 1 1253; 247 103 0 35€7 2970 Lights_ 72.7 9l,2 a W:: _98 1 _. 96.4..., 100 . .. 98 97.2 ... 98.1 fl 91,5;. 98 Buses' 2 11 0 13` 12 0 0 t2 6 0 0 6 31 %Buses 1.8.2, d.8 0 - -- 0.9. 1 ... 0 0 0;9' 2.4 0 0 7_i_. 1 Trucks 1 14 0 15 12 1 tl 13_ 1 2 0 31 1/6 Trucks 9.1 1 0 1.1 1 3.6 0 1 0.4 1.9 0 .0.8 1 Southbound St. Northbound St, Eastbound St. From North From u_ From South From West Start Time Right Thru I tJ-Tm App_ t'i l Toru Left U-Turn 1 App.Total iglu' Left tJ-Turn App.Total i Int Total Peak Hour An alysts From 04:00 PM to 06:15 PM-Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:45 PM 04:45 PM 5 139 0 141 107 2 0 109 j 27 13 0 40' 290 05:00 PM' 0 135 0 135 118 1 0 119 44 22 0 66 320 05:15 PM 1 121 0 122: 216 4 1 221 3E 10 0 48 391 05:30 PM, 0 m 0 130� 123 2 0 125 38 19 0 57 312 Total Volume 6 522 0 528 564 9 1 574', 147 0 211 1313 %App__Total; 1.1 X8,9 0 98.3 1.6 0.2 814.7 {t.3 0 PHF .300 '"0 000. $ S - .653 ,563 250 ,649 .835 72'1° .000 -799. 840 . b;e: Traffic Impact Study Sun Homes at Reckson Executive Park MASER MC Project No.: 14001622A Appendix SUN HOMES A T RECK S ON EXECUTIVE PARK APPENDIX E ACCIDENT DATA i ; i I i 1 t t , f i i 1 I ?' NYSDOT DATA EW Y RKDepartment of STATEC* p � T� Transportation ANDREWM.CUOMO JOAN McDONALD Govemor Ccmmissloner MEMORANDUM April 15, 2015 Ronald Rieman Maser Consulting 1.1 Bradhurst Ave Hawthorne, NY 10532 RE Freedom of Information Law Request# FR8-15-003909 Accident Data Route 120A in Westchester 3 Years MC Project 14001622A VIA: E-Mail (No Hard Copy to Follow) Dear Mr. Rieman: This correspondence is in reference to your April 8, 2015 Freedom of Information Law (FOIL) request. No record of any traffic accidents were found in this location for 2012, 2013 and 2014. Please indicate the FOIL request number when corresponding on this subject. Sincerely, Andrew Wu Records Access Officer 5D Wolf Road,Albany, NY 12232 I wvvw.dct.ny.gov Engineers 17 BrocIlhurst Avenoe Planners Hawthorne,NY 10532 Surveyors T:914 347.750G Landscape Architects F:914,347.7266 MASER Environmental Scientists www.r-naserconsulting.com I N i !L T I R 9 K A. April 8, 2015 VIA E-MAIL Ms. Hai Lan Records Access Office New York State Department of Transportation Eleanor Roosevelt State Office Building 4 Burnett Boulevard Poughkeepsie,NY 12603 Re., Accident Request Rye Brook, Westchester County,NY MC Project No, 14001622A Dear Ms. Lan- I would like to request both the Accident Verbal Description Report and Accident Summary Report for all reportable accidents, for the following years 2012, 2013 and 2014 for the following link. e Route 120A(King Street) from Reference Marker 120A 87013000 to 120A 87013002 Please notify -as of any cost associated with this request. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Very truly yours, MASER CONSULTING P.A. Ronald P. Rieman Assistant Project Manager R,Trojects120141,14001622A Resjdentjak?rojert InfoirratiorMcci dent\[50407 NYSDOT Accident Request.docK JOHN COLLINS ENGINEERS, P.C. has joined Moser Consulting P.A. g u 2gDA 7,013004'. 0A 1OW� �k nx 1 76071 12OA87 1300 �.` s a 3 L5f5 CV4µ1ER b�� G5,7c �Z � g; . k 1' +ConnDOT DATA Engineers 11 Sradhmt Avenue Planners Hawthorne,NY 10532 surveyors T;914.347.7500 Landscape Architects F:914.3+17.7255 Environmental Scientists www.moserconsulting.com April 8,2015 VIA E-MAIL Mr, Kerry Ross Transportation Supervising Planner ConnDOT 2800 Berlin Turnpike Newington, CT 06111 Re: Accident Request Greenwich, Connecticut MC Project No. 14001622A Dear Mr. Ross: I would Iike to request both the accident experience for the following years 2012, 2013 and 2014 for the following link, • Route 120A(King Street)from International Drive to 500' south of Anderson Hill Road Please notify us of any cost associated with this request. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Very truly yours, MASER CONSULTING P.A. Ronald P. Rieman Assistant Project Manager R:IPrajccts12014U4001522A-Rcsidential\Project lnformatioMcoident1150407 COnnDQT AccidentRequest.doex JOHN COUIN5 ENGINEERS, P.0 has joined Maser Consulting P.A. Ronald Rieman: From: Acosta, Ryan J. <Ryan.Acosta@ct.gov> Sent: Thursday,April 09, 2015 8:57 AM To: Ronald Rieman Cc: Ross, Kerry J;Interlandi, Eugene 1 Subject: FW:Accident Request- Greemwich, CT Attachments: 150407 ConnDOT Accident Request.pdf; DATACONTENT-11-13,pdf;11-13-Greenwich-King - Summary.pdt 11-13-Greenwich-King-History.pdf Ron, Attached is the information that you requested. The 2011-2013 data provided is currently the latest three year period available. The road requsted International Drive is in New York. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions on the information provided. Ryan Acosta Transportation Planning Assistant Connecticut Department of Transportation Crash Data and Analysis P.O. Box 317546 Newington, CT 06131-7546 2 Phone: (860)594-2053 W Fax:(860) 594-2044 R Email ryan.acostaCa�ct.00v From: Interlandi, Eugene 3 Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2015 2:27 PM To: Acosta, Ryan J. Subject: FW: Accident Request-Greemwich, CT Please provide a 2011-2013 accident experience for the requested location. Include the statement"The 2011-2013 data provided is currently the latest three year period available." From: Ross, Kerry] Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2015 1:24 PM To: Interlandi, Eugene 3 Subject: FW: Accident Request-Greemwich, CT ptcot From: Ronald Rieman [ snl n ltrrt;] Sent: Wednesday,April 48, 2015 10:52 AM To: Ross, Kerry 3 Subject:Accident Request-Greemwich, CT Mr, Ross Please see attached accident request. i s if you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you, Ron L Ronald P Rieman Assistant Project Manager Connect with Us: Moser Consulting P.A. I I Bradhurst Avenue I Hawthorne, NY 10532 P: 914.347,7500 ext:4807 www:maserconsulting.corn bor� Plcasc consider ffic environtretit lbefone printing this C-roaiL, In an ongoing effort to meet our clients'growing-needs and affirm the company's strategic plan,we are reinforcing our existing services while expanding regionally.Maser Consulting recently opened new offices in Philadelphia,PA and Norfolk,VA,and has acquired Environmental Compliance,Itic,(ECJ),FCl brings 30 years of experience in hazardous materials site inspection,assessment and remediation. DISCLAIMER This e-mail is confidential. It may also be legally privileged..If you are not the addressee you may not copy, forward, disclose or use any part of this email text or attachments. If you have received this message in error,please delete it and all copies from your system and notify the sender immediately by return e-mail. Internet communications cannot be guaranteed to be timely, secure, error or virus free. The sender does not accept liability for any errors or omissions.Any drawings,sketches,images,or data are to be understood as copyright protected. 2 STATE OF CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BUREAU OF POLICY AND PLANNT`1G CRASH DATA AND ANALYSIS SECTION ACCIDENT DATA CONTENT Data in the enclosed report reflects that which was contained in the Department of Transportation's accident file on the date that this report was generated and roprosents accidents occurring during the time period January 1,2011 through December 31,2013. REPORTING LEVEL Investigating police authorities have been required to complete an accident report within five days of the completion of such investigation for any accident that resulted in death,injury or a prescribed dollar amount of damage to the property of any one individual. The prescribed dollar amounts and their effective periods are as follows: $1,000,from October 1, 1988 to present;$600,from October 1, 1984 to September 30, 1988;and$400,from January 1, 1974 to September 34,1984. fBefore October 1, 1990, both operator and police accident reports were required to be completed and forwarded to the Department of Motor Vehicles. Effective with accidents occurring on October 1, 1990 and thereafter, in accordance with Public Act i 90-143, the requirement of involved operators to complete an Operator Accident Report was rescinded by the State Legislature. Investigating police authorities are also now required to forward accident reports to the Department of Transportation instead of the s Department of Motor Vehicles as formerly required. l Effective with accidents occurring on January 1, 2009 and thereafter,some investigating police authorities are now submitting accident reports electronically to the Department of Transportation. Other investigating police authorities are continuing to forward hard copy reports. Data in the Department of Transportation's accident file reflects data captured from both electronic and hard copy reports. _CLU§JQN OF L AL ROAD PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY ACCIDENTS. Property damage only accidents which occurred on locally maintained roadways from August 1, 1990 to December 31, 1991, from April 1, 1992 to December 31,2006 and from March 1,2011 to December 31,2011 were not coded for inclusion in the Department F of Transportation's accident file. Data users should be aware of the exclusion of local road property damage only accidents for these time f periods. �,&T-A.-LIMITATIONS The Department of Transportation devotes considerable resources to the analysis of each accident received and to the codification s of the location of each accident. Each accident entered into the Department's data entry system is reviewed for accuracy and completeness. Quality control routines are included in the system that validate the data. The user of the data contained in the enclosed report should be 3 aware of certain limitations. All accidents which actually occurred within the area covered by the report: i May not have been received by the Department of Transportatio n; May not have contained sufficient information to have been located in the physical area covered by this report;or i May not have been appropriately located by the Department of Transportation during codification, data entry, file maintenance or data retrieval activities. z i Accidents contained within the enclosed report may not have actually occurred within the physical area covered by the report,but ( have been placed there due to, either, insufficient or misleading information contained in the accident report or to misallocation of the accident during codification,data entry,file maintenance or data retrieval activities. GQl�STR� j Q A TORS t "Dih contributing factors indicated on the accident experience and/or accident summary have been determined by the Department of Transportation's Crash Data and Analysis section and are used by the Department in its ongoing engineering evaluation of Connecticut's roads and highways. Each contributing factor has been determined subjectively and is not meant to assign legal responsibility. From 1/112011 12:00:00 AM until 1213112013 11:59:59 PM page 1 of 11 Repast Generated 4AQO 15 8:45:00 AM Town of Greenwich RoadlRoute#735 KING ST NO 2 from 0,00 to 0.59 1/112011 to 1213112013d• s' - Summary Report ......fi��1.. Accident Severity 2011 2012 2013 Total % Fatal 0 0 0 0 O.i)0 -Inlury 0 1 1 2 13.33 B-Injury 0: 1 1 2 13.33 Injury 2 0 0 2 13.33. Property Damage ..n y _ 5 60.60 TOTAL 4 4 7 15 100.00% ItM 111�ltlttl� 1 4{� Month 2011 2012 2013 Total % January 1 0 2 3 20,00 Pabruary 1 1 1 3 20. March 0 00 0 6.00 April T 1 0 213.33 [day 0 0 . 1 1 . 607 ,lune 0 0 0 0 '. 0.00 July 0 0 0 August 1' 0 1 2 13.33 September 0 ... .. ..... ... .. 2 13.33 October a 1 0 1 6:67 kovember 0ot 1 1 6.67 December 0 0 0' 0 TOTAL 4' 4 7 15 100.00% From i/1/2011 12:00:00 AM until 121311201311:59:59 PM page 2 of 11 Report Generated 4AI2015 8:45:00 APA Town of GreenwiLh RoadlRouts#735 KING ST NO 2 from 0.00 to 0.59 Tale 3 liourarad AaY a>SlVsk Hour and Day of Week Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday; Total %p i nig ht to 12:59 AM 0 _ 0 0 0 TRI 1:00 AM to 1:59 AM 00 0 0 0 0 0 11.00 2:00 AM to 2:59 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 3,OD AM to 3:59 M 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 A 00( 4:00 AM to 4:59 ANF 0 0 0 0 0 0. t t fi_67 5:00 AM to 6-.89 AM 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 -- 0.00 6:00 MR to 09 AM 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0.00 7:OD AM to 7:59 AM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 6.67 to :5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 9:00 AM to 9:59 AM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 6.67 10:130 AM to 10: AM 0 .0 0 1 1 6.67'. 11:00 AM to 11:59 AM 0 0' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 oan to 1T:59 PH 0 1] 0 0 0 0 1 1 6.67 1:05 Pm to 1:59 PM 01 0 0: 07. 0 1 0 1 .67 2:00 PM to 2:6-9 Ki of 1 0:; 0 0 1 6.67 3:00 PM to 3:59 Pm 01 0 0 0 0 0 U 0. 0.00 4:00 PM to 4:59 PM 0 0 1 0 0 .0 1 5.67 00 PM to5:511 p141 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 6:00 PM t4 6:58 Pm 0: _ 0 0 0 .... .........0 .... 1' 1 6.67 7:00 PM to 7:53 PM 0 1 0 0' 0 1 1 3 - 20.00 8:00 PM to 8:59 PM 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 13.33 9:00 Pk�il to 06 PM 0.1 0 D 0 0 . 01 0 0. 0.00 10:DD PM to1d5 .P 0' 0 0 0 0 0 . 11-CID D Pm 1159 PM 0 . .0 0 1 0 0 0 1 667 Unknown Time 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 TOTAL 0 21 21 1 : 2 3 5 151100,:00°l0 From 1/1!2011 12:00;00 AM until 12131/2013 11:59:69 PM page 3 of 11 Report Generated 41912015 6:45:00 AM Town of Greenwich Road/Route 735 KING ST NO 2 from 0.00 to 0.59 Gf d . Hour of Occurrence 2011 2012 2013 Total idmght to 12:59 AM 0 0 a O.aQ TO M to 116 AW 0 a: 0 0.156 2:00 AAA to 2:39 AM 0 0 0 0 .0.00 3:00 AM to 3:5$AM Q 0 0 0 0. 400 to 4:59 AM 1 4 11 6.67 5:00 M;'09-5:59 AM 0' : 0 0 0 0.00 6:00 AAA to 6:59 AM 0 Q Q 0 0.00 7:00 AM to 7:59 AM 1 4 tf 1 6.67 6:00 AM to 8:59 M 0 0 0 0 ON 9:00 AM to 9:69 A0: 0 1 1 6.67 10:00 AM to 10:59 AM 0 1; 0 1 6.67 I MOM to 11:59 AM 0 0 0 0 00 Noon t4 12:59 PMi' 0 0 1 6.57 1:00 P0 to 1:59 Pil 1 6.67 2:00 PM t0 2:59 PM 0 0. 1 1 6.67 3:00 PM to 3:59 PM 0 0 0 0.00 4:0OP M to 4:59 PM 1 1 67 5:00 to :5 0 0:00 6:00 PM to 6:S9 PM 1 0. 0 1 5.67 7:00 PM to 7:39 PM 0 a 3 3 tie00 8:Q0 PM'ta8:59PM 1 t U 2 13.33 9:00 PM to 9:59 PM 0 4. 0 0 15.00 .. ........... 10:00 to 10:59 M 0. 0 0 0 0.00 11:0 M to Y : 0-1 0 1 6-67 Unknown Time 0: 0 Q TOTAL 4,1 71 15 100.00% From 1/112011 12-00:00 AM until 1213112013 11.,59:59 PM page 4 of 11 Report Generated 4/912015 6:45:013 AM Town of Greenwich Road/Route#735 KING ST NO 2 from 0.00 to 0.59 7 air k41a1l1` lJ10111EY Weather Condition 2011 2042 2013 Total °7 No Adverse Condition 1 10 U.67 Raln 2 1. 7 4 20.67 naw 1 0 1 6:67 TOTAL 4 4 71 15 100.00% LL Tn�[e � � Road Surface Condition 2011 2012 2013 Total % Cry 1 3 8 10 66.67 Wet 2. 1 1 4 26.67 5nowl$lush 1.. 0 0 1 6.67 TOTAL 4 4 7 15f. 100.00% Light Condition 2019 2012 2013 Total % r5ay fight 2 i 5 $ 53.33 Dark-Not lighted Or 9 1 U7 Dark-Lighted 2 9- 9 6 40.00 TOTAL 4 4 15 100.00% From 1/1)2011 12:00 00 AM until 12131/2013 11:59:59 PM page 5 of 11 Report Generated 4/9/2015 8:45.'00 Ali Town of Greenwich Roa&Route#735 KfNG 5T NO 2 from 0.00 to 0.59 t0>` S0� Other Roadway Feature 2011 2012 2013 Total 90 None 2 1 5 8 53.33 intersect on with Public Roadway 2 2 1 5 3.33. intersection with Private Roadway 0 1 0 1 6.67 Intersection with ommerc nve 0 0 1 i 6V TOTAL 4 4 7 15 ' 1l]iT,00% Construction or Maintenance 2011 2012 2013 Total % Yes 0" b 0.00 0 4 4 7 15 100.00 TOTAL 4 4' 7 15 100.00% Median Barrier Penetration 2011 2012 2013 Total FuR Penetration 0 i1 0 70- 0.00 00151 Penetration 0 0 0 0 0.01) No Penetratlon 0 0 0 0 0.0 Not Applicable 4 4 5 100.0(} TOTAL 41. 4 7 15f 100:00% From 1/V2011 12:00:00 AM unci! 12131!2013 11:59:59 PM page 6 OF 11 Report Generated 41912015 8:45:00,4M Town of Greenwich RcadlRouty#735 KING 3T NO 21rom 0.00 to 0.59 CwaYr[bLdft Fades 2674 M12 2IK3 Teo % Ka-led To-Grant Right Ot Way 0 1 ff 1 5.07 Improper Pawing Maneuver C! 0 1 8 Improper Lane Change b Q 1 1 8.87 Following Too Closely 3 0 5 ti 53.33 Driver Lost Control . . . 1 1 1 3 20.00 e Asleep d 1 0 1 6.67 TOTAL. 4 41 7 15 106.00% _.... ._ .-. .... - _ _........ .............................................. ......... From 1111201112:00.00 AM until 12131201311:59:59 PM page 7 of 11 Report Generated 4/92015 S.-4&-00 AM Town ofGrecnwich Road4RoOe#735 KING ST NO 2 from 0.00 to 0.59 .. .... . Type of Co"isiwn 2011 2012 M3 Tdw Turning-Opposita Birection 0 1 b 1 5.67 Si pB- me Direction 0 1. 1 2 13.33 Rear-end 3 0 5 8 53.33 Fofed Objett 1 2 1 4 26 67 TOTAL 4 4' 71 't5 1a)m% From 11112011 12:00:00 AM vr?W 12/31M 1311:69:59 PM page 8 of 11 Report Generated*W2015 8-+45 OO AM Town of Greenwich Rea&kouta 735 KING ST NO 2 from 0.00 to 0.59 VoWls Typo nil 2042 2013 idsal 'jlo Automobile 77.1 131 10fT.Fo TOTAL 71 7; 13 27 From 4192011 12:00:00 AM until 1213112013 11:59:59 PM page 9 of 11 Repart Generated 9/9/2015 0:45.•00 AM Town of Greenwich Road/Route#738 KfNG ST NO 2 ftm 0.00 to 0.59 Direction of All Vehicles 2011 2012 2013 Tota{ % North 3 4 5 12 44.44 South 4 3 815 55.56 East 0 D : 6 0 - 0.0a west 0 A 0 0 0.00 Unknown t) 0 0 0.00 TOTAL 7 7 131. 27 100:00% 0 i 1timVIM", 11 R QMnding Vehicle Direction 2011 2012 2013 Total % North 2 3 3. 8 53:33 5out 2 1 4 T 46.67 East 0 0. 6 0 3.0 West 0 0 Unknown 0 0 0,0 TOTAL 4 ...41 7' 151 100.00%, From 1/1)1011 12:00:00 AM until 12131/2013 11:59.59 PM page f0 of 11 Report Generated 4V912015$:45:00 Ail? Tawn oFGreenwich RosciRoute 735 KING ST NO 2 frpm 0,00 to 0.59 Objects Struck and Location 2011 2012 2013 Total Off Road In On On Oft Road Off Road On Gore Over and Roadway Shoulder, Shoulder, and and Medlan Area, Roadway Shoulder. Right Left Shoulder, Shoulder, Divider Ramp Ahead, Rigtd Left Nose Bank,Ledge,Finck(Off Road) 0 1 0 1 0 4 0 tT. 1 0 0 i3 0 Highway$ign,Post,Uel'ineator i 0 ) 1 . D a. 01 Q i 0 0 D 0 Tree 0 2 0 2: 0 f): ... 0 2 0 0 q.............. 0 U#itty Pole 0 3 1 4: 0 . 0 0D 3' 1 0 0 0 TOTAL 1 6 1 S 0 4 0 D 7 1 0 0 D From 1/1M1 1 12:00:00 AM until 12131!201311:59:59 PM page 11 of 11 Report Generated 41912015 8:45:00 AM Town of Greenwich RoadlRaute#n5 KPMG ST NO 2 from 0.00 M 0.59 Total Injuries by Severity 2011 2012 2015 , Total 96 Total fa—M1 0 0 0 0 0.00 To—tai A-In]ury 01 1 2 25.00, .. .... . . . . To1a18-Injury 0 2 4 50.00 T31ai n ury 2 2 26.00 TOTAI - 2 3 3 8 1 .00%a From 1112011 12:00:00 AM until 1213112013 11:59:59 PM page 1 of 4 Report Generated 4/912015$:47'05 AM Town of Greenwich RoadlRoute#735 KING ST NO 2 from 0.00 to 0.59 Total or 15 accidents tate; T+aw[►'; Road NUIe Loctlort ttr fititlPAl;yp$: t7escr7ptCcrn11t Tue reb-26-13 Greenwich KING ST NO 0_76 ?at 107$King St 2060555 1300007439 Driver Lost Control Daylight Dry No Adverse Fixed Object 1$'49 2 Condition Contrib. Direction Veh Type Maneuver Prefix. Maneuver Suffix 1stl2nd Object Struck 1st12nd Object Location Injuries Factor K A B C Total North Automobile None Apply Vehicle Going Straight Utility Pole Off Road and Shoulder, 0 1 0 0 1 Right Fri Jan-11-13 Greenwich KING ST NO 0.17 100 meters North 2048384 1300001257 Following Too Dark-Lighted Wet Rain Rear-end 19:33 2 of WILLOW RUN Closely RD(PVT) Contrib, Direction Veh Type Maneuver Prefix Maneuver Suffix 1stl2nd Object Struck fstl2nd Object Location Injuries Factor K A 13 C Total North Automobile Vehicle Stopped For Vehicle Turning Left From Driveway 0 0 0 0 0 North Automobile Vehicle Slowing For Stopped Vehicle 0 0 0 0 0 Sat Jan-05-13 Greenwich KING ST NO 0.25 50 feet North of 2D48434 1300000548 Following Tao Dark-Not Dry No Adverse Rear-end 19:36 2 HETTIEFRED RD Closely Lighted Condition Contrib. Direction Veh Type Maneuver Prefix Maneuver Suffix 1st12nd Object Struck 1sVZnd Object Location Injuries Factor K A B C Total South Automobile None Apply Vehicle Going Straight 0 0 0 0 0 South Automobile None Apply Vehicle Going Straight 0 0 0 0 0 Wed Feb-08-12 Greenwich KING ST NO 0.26 at HETTIEFRED IB39006 1200004472 improper Passing Dark-Lighted Dry No Adverse Sideswipe- 23:47 2 RD Maneuver Condition Same Direction Contrib. [Direction Veh Type Maneuver Prefix Maneuver Suffix 4911:12nd Object Struck istr2nd Object Location Injuries Factor K A B C Total North Automobile None Apply Vehicle Passing Same Direction on Utility Pole I Utility Pole Ott Road and Shoulder, 0 0 1 0 1 Right Right I Of Road and Shoulder,Right North Automobile None Apply Vehicle Going Straight Tree Off Road and Shoulder, 0 1 0 C 1 Right From 1/1/1011 12:00:00 AM unit! 12/31/2013 11:59:59 PM page 2 of 4 Repoil Generated 41912015 8:47:06 AM Town of Greeriwich Road/Route A 735 KING ST NO 2 froth 0.00 to a 59 Tataf or 15 accidents pate- ToNm ........ I r GTallislon-Type [►Ca11 AT tl�$ tl+=seri tu�rt artoi' irGtYkd�.... P Sat Jan-22-11 Greenwich KING ST NO 0.28 87 feet S of 1752559 11-900108 Driver Lost Control Dark-Lighted Dry No Adverse Fixed Object 18:01 2 H.ETTIEI-RED RD Condition Contrib. Diroetion Veh Type Maneuver Prefix 1ManeuverSuffix 13172nd Object Struck 1sV2nd Object Location Injuries Factor K A B G Total North Automobile None Apply Vehicle Negotiating Curve Highway Sign,Post,Delineator Off Road and Shoulder, 0 0 0 0 0 Right Tue Feb-01-11 Greenwich KING ST NO 0.28 100 feet S of 1759673 11-900160 Following Too Daylight Snow/Slush Snow Rear-end 7:41 2 HETTIEFRED RD Closely Contrib_ Direction Veh Type Maneuver Prefix Maneuver Suffix 1st12nd Object Struck lstf2nd Object Location Injuries Factor K A B C Total North Automobile Vehicle Slopped For Traffic 0 0 0 0 0 North Automobile None Appiy Vehide Going Straight 0 0 0 0 0 Thu Nov-14-13 Greenwich KING ST NO 0.37 at BOWMAN DR 2133330 1300041274 Improper Lane Daylight Dry No Adverse Sideswipe- 9:19 2 NORTH Change Condition Same Direction Contrib. Direction Veh Type Maneuver Prefix Maneuver Suffix 1st/2nd Object5truck lstt2nd Object Location Injuries Factor K A B C Total * South Automobile None Appiy Vehicle Changing Lane(s)to Right 0 0 0 0 0 South Automobile Vehicle Skidded Slowing or Vehicle Changing Lane(s)to Right 0 0 0 0 0 Stopping For Mort Aug-28-13 Greenwich KING ST NO 0.46 27 feet North of 2115200 1300031401 Following Too Daylight Dry Ne Adverse Rear-end 14:03 2 STONEHEDGE Closely Condition DR NORTH Contrib. Direction Veh Type Maneuver Prefix Maneuver Suffix IsV2nd Object Struck 1at12nd Object Location Injuries Factor K A B C Total South Automobile Vehicle Slowing For Traffic 0 0 1 0 1 South Automobile None Apply Vehicle Going Straight 0 0 1 0 1 From 11112011 12:00:00 AM until 1213112013 11:59:59 PM page 3 of 4 Report Generated 41912015 8:4 7.06 Alli Town of Greenwich RoadlRoute#735 KING ST NO 2 from 0.00 to 0.59 Total of 15 accidents 08tw: ToWft Roald lllrta is 1Lottmn D[1C poliW CBseE t`grtutdrig Ligfttterg 1!YE Qattfsn Typo ; DeseFiphotr .} a7Xq>r Sat Oct-06-12 Greenvdch KING ST NO 0.4.5 30 feet South of 2DD5990 1290032855 Fell Asleep Dark-Lighted Dry No Adverse Fixed Abject 4:36 2 STONEHEDGE Condition DR NORTH Contrib. Direction Veh Type Maneuver Prefix Maneuver Suffix 1stl2nd Object Struck 1sV2nd Object Location Injuries Factor K A B C Total South Automobile None Apply Vehicle Going Straight Utility Pole Off Road and Shoulder, 0 0 1 0 1 Left !Non May-27-13 Greenwich KING ST NO 0.49 50 feet North of 2088452 1300019202 Following Too Daylight Dry No Adverse Rear-end 19:11 2 ANDERSON HILL Closely Condition RD Contrib. Direction Veh Type Maneuver Prefix Maneuver Suffix 1stl2nd Object Struck 1stl2nd Object Location Injuries Factor K A t3 C Total Suuth Automobile Vehicle Slowing For Traffic 0 0 0 0 0 South Automobile None Apply Vehicle Going Straight 0 0 0 0 0 Sat Apr-23-11 Greenwich KING ST NO 0.50 at ANDERSON 1756536 11-900474 Following Too Daylight Wet Rain Rear-end 1217 2 HILL RD Closely Contrib. Direction Veh Type Maneuver Prefix Maneuver Suffix fstl2nd Object Struck 1st12nd Object Location Injuries Factor K A S C Total South Automobile Vehicle Stopped For Traffic Signal 0 0 0 1 1 South Automobile Vehicle Skidded Slowing or Stopped Vehicle 0 0 0 0 0 Stopping For Sat Rug-27-11 Greenwich KING ST NO 0,50 at ANDERSON 1618775 1100038182 Following Too Dark-Lighted Wet Rain Rear-end 20:12 2 HILL RD Closely Contrib. Direction Veh Type Maneuver Prefix Maneuver Suffix 1stl2nd Object Struck lstl2nd Object Location Injuries Factor K A S C Total South Automobile Vehicle Stopped For Traffic 0 0 0 0 0 South Automobile Vehicle Skidded Slowing or Stopped Vehicle 0 0 0 1 1 Stopping For rrom 11112011 12:00:00 AM until 12/3172{313 11:59:59 PM page 4 of 4 Report Generated 4/9/2015 8:47:06 AM Town of Greenwich Roacb/Route# 735 KING 5T NO 2 from 0.00 to 0.59 Total of 15 amdents Date Trt4VR. 1acE Illfdfi! jtlli tr7tr i1#T 'btNl�k i n�r3 L� btu Col[i54R+Type.. Dasl f t� Thu Apr-26-12 Greenwich KING ST NO 0.50 at ANDERSON 1853070 1200013182 Failed To Grant Dark-Lighted Wet Rain Turning- 20:11 2 HILL RD Right df Way Opposite Direction Contrib. Direction Ven Type Maneuver Prefix Maneuver Suffix 1stl2nd Object Struck 1sV2nd Object Location Injuries Factor K A B C Total South Automobile None Apply Vehicle Going Straight 0 0 0 0 0 a North Automobile None Apply Vehicle Turning Left from Proper 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Fri Sep-14-12 Greenwich KING ST NO 0.50 at ANDERSON 2007993 1200030104 Driver Lost Control Daylight Dry No Adverse Fixed Object 10:22 2 HILL RD Condition Contrib. Direction Veh Type Maneuver Prefix Maneuver Suffix 1 stl2nd Object Struck 1stl2nd Object Location injuries Factor K A B C Total North Automobile None Apply Vehicle Turning Left from Proper Tree r Bank,Ledge.Rock(Off Road) Off Road and Shoulder, 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Right!Off Road and Shoulder,Right South Automobile None Apply Vehicle Turning Right from Proper 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Fri Sep-13-13 Greenwich KING ST NO 0.51 45 feet South of 2126335 1300033549 Following Too Daylight Dry No Adverse Rear-end 13:42 2 ANDERSON HILL Closely Condition RD Contrib. Direction Veh Type Maneuver Prefix Maneuver Suffix 1stl2nd Object Struck 1stl2nd Object Location Injuries Factor K A 13 C Total North Automobile Vehicle Stopped For Traffic 0 0 0 0 0 North Automobile Vehicle Skidded Slowing or Stopped Vehicle 0 0 0 0 0 Stopping For ��� 445 Hamilton Avenue,14th Floor CUDWhite Plains,New York 10601 F E I) E RL`P Tel 414.761.1300 Fax 914.761.5372 www.cuddyfeder.com May 7, 2015 BY HAND ac Mr. Gary Zuckerman, Chairman, and Members of the Planning Board Village of Rye Brook6-- , 938 King Street `,-,� Rye Brook,New York 10573 Re: Sun Homes (Phase 3 Reckson Executive Park) Application for Re-Mapping of Premises into the Planned Unit Development District (Premises: 1100 King Street: Section 129.25 Block 1 Lot 1) Dear Chairman Zuckerman and Members of the Planning Board: On behalf of Sun Homes, as authorized by Reckson Operating Partnership, L.P. as owner, we respectfully submit supplemental documentation modifying the Conceptual Plan that accompanied its Petition to Amend the Zoning Ordinance and Application to map the Premises in the Planned Unit Development District ("PUD") to develop one hundred ten(110) dwellings on this 31.56 acre parcel of land (the "Premises") with ten(10) dwellings being designated as Affordable Housing that affirmatively furthers fair housing ("AFFH"). As you know, the Application pending before this Board concerns the first of a two-step process that includes the current Conceptual site plan review, and then, following the Village Board's mapping of the Premises in the PUD District, submission of more detailed architectural and engineering plans for review and consideration by the Village Board and Planning Board in the second phase of the Application, which involves the formal Site Plan. This submission modifies the Conceptual site plan to address comments made by Members of the Village Board and Planning Board, as well as the Village's professional staff and consultants, during meetings held before the Village Board and Planning Board, including the site visit to Darien, Connecticut on April 25, 2015. Following Sun Homes' review of these comments, the following changes are shown on The enclosed plans and renderings: 1. The enclosed architectural floor plans and renderings have been modified so that the Affordable Housing units are similar in shape and design to those of the market rate homes. 2. There will be five (5) attached Affordable Housing buildings, thereby totaling ten (10) units of which four(4) units will have three (3) bedrooms, and the remainder will have two (2) bedrooms. 3. The Affordable Housing units each will incorporate an attached garage beneath the unit, similar to the market rate homes, with additional surface parking located directly across the road. 4. Other changes to the Conceptual Site Plan include: C&F 2762661 1 ATTORNEYS AT LAW White Plains Fishkill New York City Stamford CUDDY&- FEDER` May 7, 2015 Page 2 a. Increasing the setbackibuffer along the Reckson Office Park lot line to a minimum of fifty (50) feet to provide more room for landscaping, as well as a small yard for each Affordable Housing unit; b. Providing a small Recreation/Amenity Area adjacent to the Affordable Housing units; and c. A slight shift and curvature to the roadway leading to the Affordable Housing units. We look forward to reviewing the project with the Planning Board at its May 14, 2015 meeting, at which time we will provide additional graphic information showing Site Sections in the vicinity of the Affordable Housing units and typical landscape treatments planned for the rear thereof. We respectfully enclose fifteen (15) sets of the following documents for review by the Village: 1. "Conceptual Site Plan" (SP-1.0), dated May 7, 2015,prepared by Divney Tung Schwalbe, LLP; and 2. Renderings and Floor Plans prepared by Bill McGuinness, architect, entitled as follows: a. "Reckson Phase III-- Proposed Affordable Homes" "Sun Homes" showing the five (5)buildings, each with two (2) Affordable Housing units side-by-side from a birds-eye angle; b. "Affordable 2BR 2-plex" rendering of the typical unit; c. "Affordable 2BR+ 3BR 2-plex" rendering of the front of the typical unit; d. Plan showing"Affordable 2BR Floorplans;" and e. Plan showing"Affordable 3BR Floorplans." Based upon the enclosed, we respectfully request that the Planning Board adopt a favorable recommendation to the Village Board to map the Premises in the PUD District. We look forward to appearing before this Board to address any questions and thank you for your consideration herein. Respectfuours, ViI ull WSN:yp Enclosures cc: (w/enclosures): Edward Beane, Esq.; Mr. Christopher Bradbury, Village Manager; Messrs. Robert Dale, Bill McGuinness and Rudolf Huffer; Mr. John Barnes; Messrs. Gerhard M. Schwalbe and Matthew Steinberg; Dr. John Collins; Mr. Ronald P. Rieman; Anthony B. Gioffre III, Esq; and Ms. Norma Drummond C&Fr 2762661 1 fN�sNa a s e SUN HOMES 11 RYE BROOK RECKSON EXECUTIVE PARK RYE BROOK,NY ar1P� C N1 1-1 PLANNER&CIVIL ENGINEER: DivNEY-Time-SCHWALRE ImelligartlaM 0 / —1Tubo LP i LE'CALCOUNSEL: cuddy&Feder,LLP 445 Hamilton Avenue,141h Floor White Plri-NY 10601 SURVEYOR: Linl<Land Surveyors.P.C. Cl NY Alahoppac,c,NY 105+1 E. `o l — ------ i. 14 ICONCEPTUAL I= ae SITE PLAN a r J®/SBK GNS =N exirt, 1+�r1 12— X88 85/OJ/15 SP-1 .0 —LEI" 6D' F L �, sI �II it I oil III IIIof legloll j lip air# 41 -- see fel one - �� • - • i as l Leel I�{�I leeI Moreii' Delp sou r`.a Islasl ■.E�r also wr- _ Affordable 2611 Floorplans x X . Great Rm Master 14' x 20' Bedroom 12' x 14' pop Garage Bedroom 2 11' x 14' SUN HOMES Affordable 31311 Floorplans Garden Patio x x Great Room FMaster17' x 23' om MAW M" 11' x 14' Bedroom 2 10' x 11' Garage Entry Bedroom 3 11' x 15' SUN HOMES U U FEDERICO ASSOCIATES TD BANK TD BANK BOWRIDGE REALTY LLC rTl ��EE���UET h� J �ASANTVI N.Y.10573 lfj AALpRE �� All 8E BOWMAN ACC65� � ACOPI ARA S R PLAZA EABEEEPLACE 8YE BROOK,N Y DIVISION �f DIVISION F-� STREET ^ STREETIt h3 II i I � I III I AERIAL FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS PLANS i ONE WAY PLAN-WESTERLY APPOACH ONE WAY PLAN-EASTERLY APP OACH SCALE:I'-1Q SCAM I'AIJ 11 OF I BOWMAN PLAZA MIXED USE RESIDENTIAL / RETAIL ri FEDERICO 80 BOWMAN AVENUE assoClaTEs VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK WESTCHESTER COUNTY BOWRIDGE NEW YORK REALTY LLC PARCEL DATA Een WCEu�ODURT E ZONING GI SSRI CF GI NFIG n 6cRI1 VODP WL vlLucF"llr 3ROOF TAX,MAP G=�I�NATIUN- FO,IaI- h lF 1 5 f_G BOWMAN 1E1 CQUNI,N OWNER/APPLICANT PLAZA 51%VR O�E'Ek TY LLC. 7 4RUCC IIILL COURT I'LL^SANT�'I LE.^i E'N YCXK I0570 BAMEHP CE AYE EB my, COVER SHEET w 11 F11, \F SIGN SIGN LOCATION MAP z BOWMAN AVENUE ELEVATION 1 N.T& OF II 5 � m U o m m c � o c = U o U Y 0 3 FEDERICO TD BANKy ASSOCIATES C7 � aS„ y � S o N/F U TD BANK A. ti a a a z O 4 ZONE -1 BREALYE FLLC j S. 0. H. ASSOCIATES Filed Map Lot 2 Filed Map Lot 5 NE 0 CLEANERS a Edge or As nan o N” �W 80 to �FA�r ',r>=vice N0910530"W b rSANTMN.Y.tw t4"MA PIEA6R=HI,00U1T 25°MAPL Stockade lerwre - w 7 T_—.-i 4 0 I°57'20"W AP - e MAPLE N09°OS 30'W 41.03 � r,- ---- - I - 5-_ eo°M PLF_ ,�`�� � � \ \ � �o �ti°� It- PLe O �n ------- w� vx 8'TREE © 12'MAPLE APLE�9, x v 24yTREE/� o W z Q BOWMAN c� I; �m N a IA I,TW TRFF 8•MAPLF X96— \ `' ��� 1 PLAZA N °II °U°d Ilo Im na�A N A N 'X o / 3 g z�u� AOU - 3 U ROx 0 `�[I �\ Q \ \ a� 1°"MAPLE ,� o V IOb y l t B)Btlua'J O N N I 14'MrnT LE 0 o j ry ( \� J� a .u, A a�* �c� o °x \ O 12"MAP m ^ 1 p? �Q u o o � `a" v 94� g co A gs b mQ e•oW TRE m��g ° �6 x \ o I A c S� �i ��z HAPMRe CE y X L2'MAPLE a vE> I ftY6 B6O0K,N.Y. v� v _ 1 SOIL U _�� Y `ZK, �As,o 1 a RT R Fu i N t' ��.4.Ebt- 882' uk��K.xfi2 2y `o t' �;: .t 7.99' IIti I N PAX�TON L_ C-I :�� C-I C "i c; F :a C; ,y Is•TWASH X / zoN z �;M� --au,�nT don pale �x v MAPL LAOIS_ u o` 8u �R �0 o I a v I Nx EXISTING o _R�� - x X� Q v v v o CONDITIONS uj p� yN`7�° ¢ \ 1 1 o.v �o 'C: � EE. _ � �C�, a' ;ja lo� iC:U C>td �4'�t ` W— I CII C` o°I°CI, a�W I rHC. - N N v ZO � � I I t l � j , a 7.get,I b°c � � 11 ss�es�o 4i X X \ cssx) u W a 10 �` �.aJ _� /�im 4mod Pooh A M 1 - 1$3$�o.;�iL uroob: Ix� 5o I� m �.°' oy-a_ FIs-OAK \ o° 1 1 V �o�,o� N itmX N B lO o N t-deli 3[l�/l�il� k°O I�N U �3m �4�Y\� IIS a S6 b6A---�6\ \ O 9 %<� ro // L4"�RIMJX7�-�yya0lb,l �`:ouo7 �� LL \ e V— � �MA N � t IHI er x wl OF NfN+ I S 9 09 1090°60NO` a� BOO Ob M��O£AS0o6 A o I B9 Sb d �«0£SOo60 Is, TRFF a� E i -- e•MAPL e s6- NI 9 �gx S \ \ Gig 3 /TR sees of yyoydpd ml a h"` 1 a m= Es'ts 4p4dsylo aey .i RM94 � 95.28 Asphalt Curb Asphalt Curb 1, a yuawanod 41o4dsV ° - .1 Inv.0uhA0.65 �p°t3g BARBER PLACE IR� _`�------- �. BARBER PLACE �g 1 �Q. �o"clay , T"_o /�' R �t� m 2 _ C v r lloydsyyo a6p3 � v � Asphalt Curb NE �3g .c z PLAN 2 fdIF:I•-1a �'-�o � z c; SUI\LY U.A'I LN I Rl1 Ml SI RS I:1'BY'fll(-1111'- g \IFF,F'TTC I,S.IJ 4TFIl APRII./I 2010. (1F II 0 ZONING DATA I ZONING PISTR­ C� ­l­NT­ El---I L ri FEDERICO TD BANK a ASSOCIATES E ................... E BOWRIDGE REALTY LLC I MWCE HH1 COURT 14 BOWMAN PLAZA HARHEH�CE AYE RROMNY PROPOSED 3 STORY MIXED USE MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL/ D VISION RETAIL WITH PARKING BELOW STREET PRELIMINARY SITE ai PLAN &ZONING TABLE E: 7� 7 01) E et "o, cy L hl BARBER PLACE ONE WAY PLAN 3 OF [I ZONING DATA 1 ZONING MIST—T C� R—D-1— TH cj El--- soluj L FEDERICO �l 17 TDjBANKTASSOCIATES E III IN 1-7 BOWRIDGE REALTY LLC ..... I MWCE BILL 00URT PI&A6AMfVW,ik N.P.10570 14 —————— BELGIAN BLOCK CURB, _ BOWMAN (TYPICAL) PLAZA9 ---- ---- 1 2 3 '9 10 HAHHEHCE F4 5 6 7 8 RYERMNY, 11 eul oma MounTeo 7" T'l 7 7 6 PROPOSED 3 STORY MIXED USE MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL/ 6 DIVISION RETAIL WITH PARKING BELOW STREET PRELIMINARY 5 5 BELGIAN BLOCK CURB. SITE fl/ ITYPICAL) I__ LAYOUT PLAN 4 12 &ZONING 17 16 15 14 13 -12 11 TABLE g'- 13 3 rc2 2 Li ------- ------ L Exrr ------ --------- can ze1E wank � ----------------------- ------- ----------------------------- --------------- --------------------------------------- -------------------------woettzoeo z' 1�-------------- ----------------- -------------- BARBERPLACE ONE WAY .... .. ... k -71—7.M-1. Y_ 'y OF [I LEGEND -•-•-•-•-•-•-PROPERTY LINE WATER SERVICE s� SEWER CONNECTION PROPOSED SEWER MAIN rL 0 STORM DRAINAGE m Wi CATCH BASIN ` to Aaaa=vo FEDERICO SEE DETAIL SHEETS 9 OF 10 awl Jalo,H • MANHOLE TD JBANK a ASSOCIATES SEE DETAIL SHEETS 9 OF 10 a TROUGH DRAIN w z SEE DETAIL SHEETS 9 OF 10 LIGHT POLE SEE DETAIL SHEETS 8 OF 10 INSPECTION PORT .SEE DETAIL SHEET 8 OF 10 BOWRIDGE W REALTY LLC C a _VCF IMWCE1mL WIIXT v�ensnn rvw.E,Ns.losto 94.1,0 --- �� --'--71-0-072 "—"—'---'—"—'X 01.20 S 94.91 _ 14 9639. 7 75w10 x 93.68 ;6s� 94 e. - 93 � x z BOWMAN 6i�_,�- —� — w m PLAZA �ss - - e FennAa III Inv mea 3 x� TREnen oR v` II , BAFEEftPWCE "eo°Ronrurv�rl Rin loos0 3EI;. rzo AYE eA00K,N.Y. 94X12 Inv.our 99.00 — 1 s o `� zerzr.-a uoc�a�aoaR R 11 RE Inv.m96.3> 3g = wroumuemrinauve D9 r6 1 Inv_OUT 90.Zb �T--T--i I I PROPOSED 3 STORY MIXED USE � ' ^ RROR.b.3 =o _ F I I I I ,i 1 oRo�n�nuEr I Teel MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAL/ em�l'o , VI v.our ee:z1 RETAIL WITH PARKIN[BELOW I R to>x I 1 SIGN Co=l�o = SKEET PRELIMINARY FF 1015 IF iR iv 101 MDRE BSMT.92.0 1 [n nv�In aa.z1 iTTii ° ITV 11 1 ILI 1 o<zsEa F.,o, ahEE PLAN �I i I aIN,obr I I p I w iF iF iR o uT eas, R P , 3 3 nv In�a 3 gl o .X27A- 1 w. Ou1 «a 1nV.IBB.38 < sE 5 � x T2ENCH DRAIN94 00271oRAm ImInv.outsiis 1 w�FCF nE�O ._._._. ._. ._._._.___._._. ._. ._._._._._. —__ .rasa 1 a ry9 X ml 1 N oEraaU"--_n_Ro- —___—_____ 3.57 osez 93-89 - --,�q csros -c°.T., - -_ woo --- --- - oEn eo or w� _ 1 a -_ 95. PROS 17' MP 0 -00% 'S a 1 Existg 10 0 Ex stg 89'Wa ter MonWMeN"� —._ ° e °`Ex stg 8 Wata1 c �'° `I°�;7i= p BAR PLACE ONE waY `��g CIaY Sewer �(iy pR ee Sewer T�'�•• 1 - m U nSrRUC7 W�En ROAD 1,REN RR o�E a o eR ex�r.snH RROR. e ex�sr�n�13��SNR_11 ,.� R. � IN 95.89 �;�sr�n �R�Lr��Re. , RRRimD of,3 s NR. -'5 Rn 9�so URS AN CONCRETE 9 1 a Ra ono Ro�ENEnT , m 553> "QMp move exlsrm� im.our e1 e, 1s,zs ecn n To NATCI+ ..�.� ,. E ETInG. �. � PLAN � T Po e - 1 Ctlp.94.M 5 of F w E>' RI h101.97 Rim�4.71 cE of r Inv.In�9.86 6CpL8:I'=IU 7�Vj­"-"N"l L�n - Inv.0u1--84.81 of s OF 11 � �EGENI� TREE PROTECTION NOTES: Average Grade CalculatiaH PH ARms arvo ---'---PROPERTY LINETy r,u11-veeunmuzr saAoms vncums nrzeA taNrg n eg vg 2 consreucilorv,sucoms cor vRevARAnon,era.. EXISTING CONTOUR GraBe Grade Abn Wall Lea �1 PROPOSED CONTOUR 925D 925D 200 9250 14% i.w a0 vnaulns novenenr of woReeRs oR nAc"mezr oR ourtvino of consrzucnory ceeRls nory eouivnervr,ve"Gce Z� 95.50 9600 200 95]5 1363 1]050] EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN 96.00 97.00 2.00 96.50 28.63 2,762.80rHe oaiv cores or occ T-oz Teees. ""�� InsraL�ea mans oR eAZRIeRs s"A�L ee HIAceo 11 ours 97.00 99.00 2.00 90.00 d3.54 4.2W.92 (�1 100.50 101.50 2.00 1o1.00 18.00 1.818,00 coneTe6"Na. �nsreATT«eeeemnlnGaF�oNeT4,-NnAn-P47INrcA�7'P1Ilo-1 1 e SEE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION EXISTING TREE TO BE PROTECTED 101.50 101.30 2.00 101.50 4087 4890.07 SEQUENCING NOTES ON SF-IEET '0. SEE DETAIL SHEET 8 OF 10 101.50 101.25 2.00 101.30 6.00 600.25 \� 10135 101.75 2.00 101.50 6.00 609.00 1,consreucrion ve¢ioo. a TReE vaoTecran neasurzes sNAcc ee nonlrocEP Ano nAlnrnmeP TnaourNogr Tre 101,75 101.75 2.00 101.75 30.21 3.07387 reae,ouems T"e oeowmc se<son.FOR aT EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED 101.75 101.50 2.00 101.83 8.00 608.75 01.59 01.50 2.00 101.50 6.00 609.00 eoeT 311-NI-1--7-10 1-11n 11 onsTe ran. FEDERICO - 11 SILT FENCE 99.00 94.50 2.00 98.75 61.80 5,906.89 SEE DETAIL SHEET R OF 10 9450 g2b0 2.00 93.50 22.00 2057.00 ncTviTies sHncc ee inneoinTecr eevcaceo To THe'71-acTnn oT THe rcunGmac.rtr. 'cceo ev consT¢ucrion ASSOCIATES SSO(I^TES L_J CATCH BASIN AND INLET PROTECTION 91.76 81.75 2D0 97.75 2180 1926.75 � = t1 1. Y1 SEE DETAIL SHEET 10 OF 40 192.50 I 9250 I 200 9250 I 29.67 I I2,T94A8 � A-c 4 STABILIZED CC 371=CN ENTRANCE _ T SEE DETAIL SHEET 10 OF 40 358.19 / 34,701.58 tsl Fbar Avela9e 93.61 EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION Elevaaan Grafi _ x 101. - 9742 - 6.08 10'MAP E x o PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION B.idin HEI h1 GEICIlIa910B BOWRIDGE Avera Grade t0 Bsmt Ceili4 01 w LLC lel Floor to Mean Roof 3551 Bk' He'h 39.59 4UW ft 10"MAPLE E to �j I'd9 '/6PROCE HOL WOftT /^/, �..T PIEA6ANfVW,E,N.Y.10570 26°MAPLE 94.110 ,^a14"MAPLE srvlc - __ _ 0 94.91 `"+ _ 7 - s �T�frio5e - -- 1.20 BOWMAN A 95 ss� 93 - _-E_ �� PLAZA 3.61 � Z 4 x ONSTRJCTIOl4 1a9.3e ENTRAIN E a n 6AR6EBPWCE 44 j440� e` X m y n RYE am N.Y. X n 94.12 - ----- _------- - it �o z v ( X LP OPOSED 3 ST6RY Mi�ED USE i "y EA\ DISIP2 �� eX� ULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL-/- 101 ^T ON PRELIMINARY TAIL Wi�H PA�Ki17�BELOW STREET GRADING/ FF BS920 SEDIMENT MT &EROSION TREEOROTOECTION STABI IZED _ / \ \� PLAN ,� consrcTlOn. N a TAIL 4 R'EENT�A'NGE ''�v X:m o� � 1 ��s' '�� SA, [L'6 X IIII /rMPaa,a. o ee rr r l3.27 i44�1 7 U eo.1q G NSTRucTI n- 94 2 1 m ml 6x 6 ,q ><� m ENTR i o^L L 1® x- \ 98 E �uX m ro '~ mIEPJm N w o a sm ziwPc ______ wicer�€oov z---------_____-____ a 93 93.89 W c9ro5 " a, T _- - N = I �r d � BARB(hR�PLACE ONE WAY G Ao REM of EXeTN �P"oLT�aR9 NSTALL�on�RErE 1J11 IN o oA�EMEnT Ion Ta NATE» EXSITING. MAIF:r-1a GRASS SW LE of 11 KEY SY_NBOL NAME QUANTITY SIZE ANI AATLRMAPTF _ _,'CAL ACER CA o CRAB LE R l i"CAL MALUSAPPSI'. KC (D KWANZAHCHERRY 5 2.5"(SAL O w0 wIIITF OAK 5 2, CAL QU " ERCUS ALBA O COI IMAH0 SPRUCE CS PICIA PUNOEVS 0 CJ JUNIPREFPRUI IORI]ONTALIS 2C4L g FEDERICO JL I[Fx 64 2'-4' TD BANK ASSOCIATES L.T ��1&e UPIUGH'I IUNIPER 12 4'-6' A-c"�orL lornr.... o 'TI" .IUNII'EKUS 10°MAP E BOWRIDGE W REALTY LLC C I1 1 1 �Wo wo wo CA T�T'�'p 10"MAPL IMWCE 1mL 09IXT f Nuc `'GANG TI.A,X PIEA6ANTVW,E,N.P.10570 26" PLE VN 14 LE i. - -'.� ' :�.°N ':: --= — - -Z C4 J BOWMAN PLAZA 2 Wo KC UJ i avaeaoa Nv UJ I W= I CA KC PROPOSED 3 STORY MIXED USE CA DIVISIOjv MULTI-FAMTLY RESIDENTIAL/ I L�j, RETAIL WITH PARKING BELOW ^ 'STREET PRELIMINARY Kc 1 LANDSCAPE 2CA PLAN 24•�TRE UJ I CA All ILEX I cl of E I I wo AM Cg CA KC CA KC CAMA BARAR PLACE ONE WAY PLAN 7 MAIF:r-1a OF II �^ M Cultec 330 HD Recharger System tiE�tiv.1ss�qps Q N° 9 S H 00FR 1 cNioSUN ® v mm CULTEC RECHARGER 330XLHD CHAMBER SYSTEM sEg 1n°°` � iw 1i0 PAVED TRAFFIC APPLICATIONCCICIETE TYPICAL CROSS SECTION DETAIL 2-0"5 UA a , PLAN �a mcH waswEo au coMPncho nu - . L—A E oP ua .oah` an n. DETAIL OF .. r cH<naea ASPHALT PAVEMENT REPLACEMENT ^4'"'x z FEDERICO OVER TRENCH '" m Px ASSOCIATES ._. . m�.e SECTION A A -r.•� �,.EFl.a�E,.ER a= . omrn oa.oa.w.cs m,w.'c.� NOTE'. DLL STRUCTURES LND CLSTINGS SHLLL BE CAPABLE OE FILO LOAOINGBOWRIDGE CHAMBER � REALTY JINTERIA—DUPIN LLC SCORED CONCRETE SIDEWALK DETAIL of CULTEC,Ina o a„s-<a,6 �CULTECContactor®and RechargerJ � ASPHALT ON CONCRETE PAVEMENT P.D.F.280 vH:jsool ac�Lrec �TM Plastic Septic and Stormwater Chambers "HANDICAP PARKING ONLY”SIGN IN CONCRETE wa Federal Road Fx"w��I,'rE�'�o .rr CULTEC INSPECTION PORT DETAIL FILLED STEEL PROTECTION POST REPLACEMENT OVER TRENCH Cl.-Il ,CT DM—-A ww (N"T.S.) 7SMUCE ML COURT PLEASANTV W.E,N.Y.IfB70 �. Holophane RSL-35D SeFIesLNFl,IFlaIfe BOWMAN Reld sentlal Llghl'ng Post Top Max mum welghl 521bs C '��•`�"`.,"'•' lem o �'E— y� 16115 IXV 7 It CE DETAIL OF ASPHALT"DRIVEWAY& ����CONCRETE CURB � � �„� samM N. PARKING AREA � "'`� `•� ` "%' "- Rve eaoolc,N.v. F,I ��nm a�.� I w.Na.M ,am..x.` ...• �� _.., st.D��7 �.�-F• .., ,.�... ..R �,.��x. i Diu'.0 ( CONCRETE ORNEWAVlPRON DETAIL WRX SIOFNA_LK MRs �TFWE FMNG DETAI- BOWMAN AVE �s r CAI OR Ee _m.m DETAILS a SAE�u R,EnG�o"L .X,E+��H �r'�yyY i _ p rtn,m-.awwr`�'xccri norms irw.Enpc awin�oFln eDiDE 5 LExs 1NaN f �J • w! loses a c lad'8 1Ein&. I`(nE•.i,.E. oa+s siVLL.a a u 0 FEn aF saurtxm SFxEFc nR RP w W DETAIL OF FIRE HYDRANT '� Ba&�g ma m �m pnpa erc-,sM1an y ® ® ONE muop --- WAY / N I any Tina Ido .,,m J. Lmim of Proemed ams,mclWuw,do me I m RmdinR. '� J smckpJwg M mammals, of c mw�OF NE'N+ �� 4 g � w mem,velJcle ParianR.mavemem of woAm w nma.IM1�inery � � ' Pedomping of mnmu'Jun aebms �� ....,.w,.'aK S j — � Treesmremain ild^Ishefelso vaxs and m(ery lmclnB anNw z..�. P ,c..,.. `e�,an� sm�D•of ace w 6 m ' mnside the MPB f I Rab Mai t nuexu ti.•,r • min s18n9- pmtnteJ ve edJon e f �\ poMbnad xun inn prtaeclN az>M1all be Dlxadm tie. IM�emlvelmx of proun mm8oretl and � a 1� ,mmmn.v. • mal Jumelgm JdamstmNm Derioa. . -..n w.- .aun.s € ® Paxted aces skill be luGM mbons ,mrm�+rno, ,wc I'm— a, s¢u wu.no ...a •"` 10 a`gym • dmvmme medium aM mde� r •`. "� _ h a(rswmal<J o(mn ss n.aa _ r P � snuF 1 ••" ame��.®� ,s sw�wn Iss�o u(o a[leas Jus erowirgaseasms after mmDlBeJm of L w ONE WAY SIGN DETAIL �`r"^ Q DETAIL OF WATER SERVICE CONNECTION (SIM-TO FlRE LANE AND DO NOT ENTER SIGN DETAILS) D�m..mlues damaReamaua br mmm�am amvwea sxau o r be immsdiamlY repUwdm Nesaasfactionot the mwiapaliry. LAMP POST DETAIL OF n � • A I., IT- ----------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------- ----------- rL — I w_l Ll FFF—I H FEDERICO ASSOCIATES ------ ---- L----------- Tre�PPOQT -IIIL I-111-11 F L 1-1--SO 1-1 .... HE Hl iiiiii III III IEEE H . . DIUMESTER H Hill ENCLOSURE PLAN ---------- Illllk DETAIL BOWRIDGE DIUMESTER ENCLOSURE PLAN DIUMPSTER ENCLOSURE SECTION DETAIL .......... REALTY LLC aw �E DEKA 6OC lOY, GAR' "I IL-FII 7 SMUCE ML 00URT EE ILA''F SOLD LENALL AP—D BELGIAN BLOCK CURB TIH I'D DETECTABLE TACTILE FINISH SURFACE OF WARNING SURFACE flL SLOPES TO BE IN T_ E BOWMAN BY ARMOR—TILE A CORDANCE WITH ANSI ADA 11 1 2003, PFR ADA / PLAZA F` E`'EE FINISI _. I L E F3%%,E Il�ID`F UIRE SURFACE OF MANUFACTURER INSTALLED R ED Sp�C Tj N SLOPES TO BE IN IFICA o I E,­IETE ACCORDANCE WITH ANSI IE Soo 0 A117.1 2003. HAMEH�CE _1.S_IOYI M �I. — ��\ ELIES,�,IE Rw am NY rvM SECTION A—A SECTION B—B SIDE VIEW TRENCH DRAIN NOTE, ALL STRUCTURES AND CASTINGS SYLAI_I_BE CAPABLE OF H2O LOADING. PLAN HIIE IONNEI— DROP CURB & RAMP ------ TN`lECl`TL 11AUNT S A �TEPI N, A DETAILS HIll IONN11— SECTION TONCULUN T 77-7_T IEIT EICl,"" ,:l 111 11,TER PLAN DROP CURB & RAMP DIANE I IIATE! AAMIBELL FO NDRI I., -Ml I I-I C-1 ....... NOTE: Catch BOO!, FERd Curb Z KA­�01 ANIIIEI L 1. ED N 117 1,G,u,I. L �L-1 OR All—O _A 0�&TF SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE DETAIL ��,��Sj�,IHEAQ F—HER F�I­El IIADE ELEI NOTE, ALL STRUCTURES AND CASTINGS SH—BE CURB TYPE A CAPABLE OF H2O­0AJDNG BI FI• R,ADIHITMENT N.T.S. ATEII AT I 1AIT I"SOLD­�2LDCK . ..... uLTsc ovsreTLxoowaEa —IR RILYRIA—­ "EAT .N"ETE A","EEL fMN ID`E'l'AlTNToA F., NIIETE— A A Al 1IN1 ]IT-­ z I IEE 11HEI A ...... _:III 111ITIRE1 D:1 W 21 1, HE DO TI nPPreaeEo5FE UTILITY - --------- A, >A FA IIII—E /RA` FRONT MEW SECTION A A SECTION A—A DETAIL OF FLAT SLAB Q PRECAST CONCRETE DRAIN INLET DETAIL OVERFLOW STRUCTURE LAYOUT OF SLAB Ii�H EB TYPE A N.T.S. - WITH SUMP NOTE. ALL STRUCTURES AND CASTINGS SF44LJ_BE NOTE. ALL STRUCTURES AND CASTINGS SHALL BE NOTE. ALL STRUCTURES AND CASTINGS aHAI_I_BE N07E. ALL STRUCTURES AND C4571NG5 SHALL BE OF [I CAPABLE OF H2O LOADING, CAPABLE OF H2O LOADING. CAPABLE OF H2O LOACBNG. CAPABLE OF H2O LOADING. GENERAL CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCING NOTES I'll rw=e '�'�S ONES w'N h gip-F, PERCOLATION&TEST HOLE oArA� Prior m any earthwon:,pu e antral m boll be momuea Ino ordonoe with nL,En reel, -L,Er r„anT A, IN orlon o the plans and malntalned In reffective condltlon u[hrough out the construction period. PERCOLATION TEST HOLE g1 WAS LOCATED 25 FEET OFF BARBER a,w �. Awa'7" renucx ewwc "T""'F PLACE AND 20 FT.OFF THE L Install Constroct Dn Fence end SUIT F.hE,h, IVATs DRVEN MN 11 INI PROPERTY LINE,P1 WAS 36"DEEP,MED.BROWN COLOR,SILTY LOAM Stake penmeter of alta with o ange consMucbon s own,� t s owTn caourvu W IN fencing. �I� a INF I MODERATE COMPACTION DUE TO ITS LOCATION NEAR THE DRIVEWAY. Eros on Control Measure Y .,, - THE PWRC HOLE nstollet on of sit tenc'ng ek khe dawn-gradient penmeter Df all a os proposed ter . . MIN TEST S STARTED AT 8:26 AND STABILIZED AT-2 WITH A RATE disturbance. In addition,tree protection shall be ns[,Iled around trees tD be saved os per INSTALLATION NOTES r%' m �m www mymw w OF 2U MN.PER grading plan and date Hl sneers 8&10. Prase vrw CH- AL 9'.22 PERCS WERE WITNESSES AND RECORDED. ME LEVEL 2,SCENIh ed Constrnctan Entrance as'MlN DENNE 111T 922 265" PFIO,t0 vegeta[io ve end/or resradN,ateRIP-11-111pad ,.o-sw•61Npi61Ns�ag a�„rrv.rsw,„�.n,raK„tam�mr„n„,�,.„�.r,„oa��,vv� FOGNIccsri FILTE elNUMtLL 9:32 D” 20MIN/INCH shall be o cted In conformance with the etads and location dlustratetl on he .w.Y Mw oarmw ar re )'min FILTER ctom a'Mw. 9:34 25.5” ...1F ed°plan _ — pLD Gaaarva 9 44 2d5 2D MIN/INCH FEDERICO s ry ury 9:555 24.21' 40 MN/INCH”(MAY HAVE MADE A MISTAKE ON ae9aete do§ f trance m u IMS ols NrAL DEPTH READING) ASSOCIATES -Thee San Orbe bens ard('edn at edegraded per,edea y to remove bu t coPss is and ry < 9:57 215” flea roan can[mee�pper ayersem ensu e p,oper rung on'ng. IP INLET PROTECTION �r`T°”°r"' Io:07 22" za Mw/wcH NTS CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS 1o:og las DESCRIPTION 1o:19 21" 20 MIN/INCH 3 Clearine o cetation R Tau v T ua T Aapwpoo. USE 21-30 MN ATE _ The on tractor r the existing vegetation witNln the II-Its of dlsturbnnce!pr the proposed ...r..m etre, PERI TEST P12 WAS LOCATED ZD FEET OFF THE BACK PROPERTY nen-uenpn,e 11dmgenAisting trees flagged m r CNP ad b,Meh and trees mat a oVed OFF 't°„Z.G,pn. .e.r 9 t.e"0�,9,a�,h. ,'ENE N AA w ryCAR, uNE AND zs FEET OFF Infer use as-11h or Naal Off site&dispose a p ope,ly. Grub root syAl-A phd swmpsreW flet/z au,Aa°unnMuFVmEsry pscrvlrve THE AT C,ADE FENCE. P2 wAs 36 INCHES DEEP AND WAS MED v BAoWN SILT LOAM. PERC 4 Rough F-ding fo ,kine A ear/Building Stites ulanrl x, LTTHEI ITUR x, TEST WERE STARTED AT 8:32 AND A STABILIZED RATE OF 10 MINS. MAINTENANCE I N /INCH WAR BOWRIDGE The contractor shall c ougF grading At the p sea p king a and building site'-eluding P CHIEVED T 9;06, THE PERI RATES WERE RECORDED AND depositing and compact ng eo arm I ,the pgrE,ing pp "hHpF HRn of flu a ” be rrara nrva MnHralnL nru0 w1 IN Pis sTARTINc AT �] n 12"Ilfts and IFFFF tad to 111 d,nsityas DurAg c nstruclion,the contractor shall ensu Fe etfiat all 1,24 TIME LEVEL REALTY stormwater withln the construction areas Is being contained on sH1e" ne..m..rAENT 9'24 19,5" LLC Erosion Control Measure SILT FENCE 9;34 20.5" 10 MINS/INCH 9:3fi 19" AHI newly graded areas shall ba stabilized with,pp,opriats vegetative cover and/or mulch.Contractor 9;487 20" 11 MIN/INCH shall ensure that adequate silt fencing i,In place and fi-boning p,apedy during earthmoving actiNtles. 9;48 187" Soil Stockpiling 9:59 18" 11 MINS PER INCH 76PR0®ImL WART �nIaTH on2-Le TE rvslsur USE PERS RATE OF 11-11 MINS PIEA6ANTVRLE,N.Y.10573 DEEP TEST HOLES 1 AND 2 WERE B FEET DEEP CONSISTING OF 5_Final Grodine D4 Ped:ine Areas and Drivewev TYPICAL URBAN SOILS. � The contractor shall commence flnal grading of the parking area Includlng me grading for the z'TorvE INSTU SOILS WERE NOT CLEARLY DEFINED BECAUSE THE AREA HAD subbase. xm rcmanm maws ,Ere stn Pnerx BEEN DISTURBED IN �smom ass THE PAST THE SOILS NOTED WERE MED BROWN SILT LOAM WITH BOWMAN Erosion Control Measure _ wins uE H AREAS OF LIGHT GREY v..v v SANDY SILT WITH TRACES OF CLAY. ND ARCED WATER WAS Contractor shall e re that all sit fencing is functioning properly while parking area and driveway PRESENT BUT THE BOTTOM OF PLAZA grading progressessu >PNPJ a c 1-I THE HOLE NEAREST THE ROAD WAS MOIST WITH MOTTLING AT 65 TO PLAZA e Dronoge and ut ty Can strvcton xl6,urs Irv, 7 FEET. AN OLD After the peaking ar away has been graded,t installatlon of ■ sF\ SEPTIC SYSTEM WAS ENCOUNTERED IN THE MIDDLE OF THE AREA parking a drveweyd Sdorm dHPN B9e facilities and utdhles In accordance ,11h the e,g,,C,F[ng �.�.4� s exss anuAx .�.�s� AN— delalis and mendufacD—T,Specifications- srarvc RARREHP CE Eros on Con[ro M i ftYE eR001'N Y While[r Hing operations far d nage a left open D might eL oa..o s�wm o„,e n anpprapriate sed erosiond< an eplocesIf t nF,p,,,,p,totiDn e 1s�(ra ttaT tR with ou appropriate duet pond practN- It Hmplemented s that s uta on bypass the vam aasmeeu�mm sewan�m wg�nnm t,e cN and[b,safely 1-1111 slt,the drain HNIFs and drain inlet protection�h allw be Hnsmlled- i z.a were ywlmmy .�m ms�u.o s1 s auxl.w i.svuw+s mmnee VnaY wwumuemunwwa. 7.Construction,f Dwellings CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS flame,claw The Cnh,ct,r shall commence construction o p,posed dwellHngs.Grad,land to new elevations shown n T a ro cI un un - RYa amok YOM on the plans. nIL se DDrvsrwcTfn or z.a Dorvslreucnory Pa ea taken fil]N3013 Erosion Control M Pale no a:nes cono-eapF shall, ,e mat p v,d snt f, m m,p meter or m,dweum m n A le aeMaef se lith« Ing is ,i g. swa area oroerc nae= rasa s.r. addition,all r m Ne tlwellin grdp II be s f,lyn.....y,d to Us d,pin 11 1, Im N,,lately - I Mowing establishment pf th,grad,At dIF,sa-I,topsoil nd seed with sp,,Ifl,d seed m1,and mwch SNniICW apo Me bin PD inmates wah hex INLET ANI nstn IN ewes FY IANNIAcs IF ALTRINATf-RHM. Vo ams Ntlmp= O.CQ91 o.E OalRara=al,aaamlaa..= �O003..M.11'n DETAILS 8 Asohaltc Bnder&Too Course Pavement 0.398 e.E/a.", The contractor shall commence and complete p ving,f the parking ar as and driveways In CURB DROP INLET gaaume 25%cl cordance with the approved plane. Shoulders shall b,backfilled andetlnal graded to conform PROTECTIDN ad9e9 racror 0.260 c.r./a�Uday UBE THIS PERO ROTE wlm approved gh.ding plans. 1� �mm a cspec Srcet,9lorege upesllyr L.I.' 11.16 e.r./kf. Once the binder...se has been completed,stormwater will be able to enter the Catch basins 6kawall area far laywtahaxn= pIt,x MIII I and dran mets and be conveyed through the d nage system. Sn-the catch barn rm will �e Paflmelerx Hepnt of abm 110 38.5 _511,1 a �ry be set at a hgher elevat on than the tinder course eevat on the contractor wll have to ensure oWT"L MeuT TEp� the water enters the catch barn grates- Thr can be accompl shed by ether temporarly n. a bkvrd abmrytlon-n 3a aoura 6be armxpw rak 1be[ _Lv1 ty YWt1 oving the curb piece from me catch b n Name or temporarily bull ding up Ue asphalt to ,J tpTANVIL BEwd res anw lm the rim elevation on the high side of catch desln. Uh, DLDm Paorw peNoln= propme,= 19.E94 a.f e v,a,mt,rte a aw,prrvpAL Esdistu tabish vegetation in all rbed areas In accordance with proposed planting plans. ,arta 10-Rem e Exc s Sed mens y _ After the rte hos n amp� -e to a er ra nog.s perot'Dnel, w11-ENTEEx1.9 r�� c" 25 wMa,nn Er- 3Bin mu Orad sed men is shall bee vde ds fdro ea adjacent LD dthe sit fe g p-r to p^u vr�y rr Net ncr¢as mEr�tl P2 iry 'a 1p romev ng tF ... eras smn a...-voted sed mems sh posed of et �IO'u rv. N��OF NE'R on epprovede lac,tion e cep table to[he Vilage' -pres.ntotive. F. f Ia rano, 4 = - 393 t. E CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS aclaaa�e_.n,mwn.a a19ewNI NN,mna" <au�er Nal lnc J. E ICIYILFI'IN"" Ahl ' ML lLELF.»T NAsrvw"'P FT U L11h, EIT 1,11 F A 11 PART .pv� rlsYc Ewmwe Lepllh Me1 1, nea ere -U1l,1.V1 E W1111 O` cAN YA Ol Moa fFouhI ati "FILL ms Rar'o ENIHI SOF NE{yy � —w LL IF PuceD ovLA HE CHINA Areen P,ore To Puc rve roP O,D Is .,FA n n rsf RE VA�Nlll �IFFBENT T 1 A A rv��IFF AAA�AAAHAFNLITI ARAA�AA EA:� 10 IS STABILIZANNE ED P P G cDNSTRucnoN can�,a Na .roM less- OF II ENTRANCE • U U FEDERICO ASSOCIATES TD BANK TD BANK BOWRIDGE REALTY LLC rTl ��EE��CDUET h� J � 04 �ASANTVI N.Y.10573 lfj LpRE �� AE IAL f 8EPI BOWMAN RA US ACCESS� � ACCA R AD PLAZA EABEEEPLACE ftYE eft001'N Y DIVISION �f DIVISION F-� STREET ^ STREETIt / h3 II i I � I III I AERIAL FIRE APPARATUS ACCESS PLANS i BARBER BARBER PLACE ONE WAY PLACE ONE WAY PLAN-WESTERLY APP OACH PLAN-EASTERLY APPOACH SCALE:I'-1Q SCAM I'AIJ a 11 OF II FEDERICO ASSOCIATES W W a MAX ROOF 13].42 BOWRIDGE noQ 4 RELLC Y 0 0 ~ PftECE HIL ODUftT %EA6ANTV W.E,N.Y.Ifd70 Ful2 0 0 BOWMAN IDID PLAZA W :::]]=El Ell El BAREEft P1,ACE L � � � ftYE eft00E,N Y Q �umxssnre swsv.ww. Q m o SIGN SIGN Q BOWMAN AVENUE ELEVATION F�5T a Eaeo Md, v N��OF NE'N� E BOWMAN AVENUE ELEVATION SCALE:I/4._l"T 2 Al OF FEDERICO ASSOCIATES a "'X R°°F 3r4z BOWRIDGE J RELLC Y 0 76PROCE IML WORT PIEA6ANTV W.E,N.Y.Ifd70 BOWMAN o PLAZA ❑❑ � ro RARREftPWCE � Q �usftYEftNY ara,u 4 BARBER PLACE m MUM ELEVATION 1° Em�� L Eaeo,y� v N��OF NE'N� E BARBER PLACE ELEVATION SCALE:I/4._l"T 1-7 A2 OF h ------------- -11 � F L------------------- --------------- L-------------- ------ ----,- --------- ---------J --- ------------ rL FEDERICO ASSOCIATES BOWRIDGE REALTY - - - - - - -� - - -�- -�- - - �- - - - - - - LLC RE 76PROCE IML WORT %EASANPVOIS N.Y.IWO - BOWMAN ° a PLAZA N _. RARPLACE mo I I ftYE eR0K,N Y o I I E�ESA7OR ME s"s, BASEMENT --- PLAN I I 14 73 �2 11 OaFIgE I I I _ I I I i i�0.E1o1,�;,ai I� � of NE'N ----- --------L—� -- L--------------J L--------------J ----J ---------------L Jig n .�ioni --------------------J - »- o BASEMENT PLAN �n,E SCALE:IM-1•-T z A3 OF TERRACE TERRACE ❑ LIV,wG AREA BEDROO�MU rL Ell.LIVING AREA BEDROOM 2 asxux FEDERICO 1 BEDROOM UNIT ASSOCIATES z° TYPE 6BUNIT Feei 6 2 BEDROOM UNIT _ �,.�6 _ TYPE'°'UNIT ;° OWRIDGE _ KITCHEN REALTY Feeioo EAIPeE 0 LLC DO � IB 6MEs aHz KIT nHa e' 31 zne ASAN EIlAN.Y.RT - ' PIEASANTVW�E,N.Y.Ifd70 —00 LAUNDRY I', LAUND Y EryTRy """ BOWMAN BEDROOM 2 PLAZA eaosv � y szs q RARREHP CE "a .}� ftYE eR001'N Y 00 Ea xer 660 DRY L°UiD6 ENTRY KITCHEN .o O A x-xsfie N 6MEG°Hz � 6MEGHx - — �� ELESVATOR `� ED FIRST FLOOR PLAN p 1 BEDROOM UNIT ININ 2 BEDROOM UNITFl NiO94 1 [:] ] ETYPE'B'UNIT TYPE'B'UNIT EµEo,iq o a OF6NE'R� -7E LMN6 AREA BEDROOM2 BEDROOMU E ��. s LIVING AREA s.xo e ❑ ^zs n�z ❑ 6a s xxsv BEDROOM Iz soy, s eow z eow 1j 1�z11 TERRACE, p TERRACE TERRACE ,q coo=s zsa=s �3 TOTAL FLOOR AREA: .` I'1--,-11,-,,I, - 1241 FIRST FLOOR PLAN R SCALE:1/4'-I-T z A4 OF 1-1 TERRACE TERRACE TERRACE ❑ a F7T1,1— OOM II �xlLIV,wG AREA BEDROOII M BEDROOM2 ❑ ❑ ota ❑ LIVING AREA BEDROOM 2 LIVING AREA rL asx„z S FEDERICO IBEDRCOM UNIT ❑ ❑ ASSOCIATES I., TYPE'BUNIT ------------------- 6 2 BEDROOM UNIT TYPE'A'UNIT :i xlro e'- 1” ❑ -- 9 — ❑ ❑ BOWRIDGE FeeiD oo z BEDRooM uN�T ❑ REALTY �� ❑ Ma xy TYPE'B'UN17 MEGH eosa O e e ❑ sl NECK zKIT nHa e' 31 _ zne 79RUCE ID1L WUftT %EA6ANTV W.E,N.Y.Ifd70 00 y LAUNDRY LAUND Y e EryTR0 ENTRY —00— xs M c trx OD _, 4'� ED D ❑ o ,ITH,EN BOWMAN BEDROOM 2 PLAZA - e.ssF o �0 BABBEBPLACE ftYE eft001'N Y I DQIl 4 KITCHEN 1111 ED 00 ENTRY ENTRY ENTRY LA UND KITCHEN I LAUND 2 O� R I 0 n a x e ry zeta zero � �<s x ss � z-xssa V xz-z' $ a w N tMECsHz tMECH ME eHz• ELEVATOR KITCHEN s ❑ s SECOND FLOOR xan ❑ o ED PLAN FE�Et �''' ❑$ 1 BEDROOM UNIT p 1 BEDROOM UNIT 2 BEDROOM UNIT n N,asa 1 1:1TYPE'B'UNIT TYPE'B'UNIT ❑ EµEo,iq 6 o a ❑ OF NEN BEDROOM BEDROOMS BEDROOMS ❑ E 1os.1oe asn+zs [:] LIVING A� RFA sn.zs LMN6 6REA El z sae x xo.e z zo.e ❑ ` TERRACE ,vp TERRACE ,rp TERRACE LIVING Al2€A �to.t zao.t �t�t TOTAL FLOOR AREA: — SECOND FLOOR PLAN SCALE:1/4'-I-T z A5 OF 1-1 TERRACE TERRACE TERRACE TERRACE ❑ a F7T1,1— OOM II �xlLIV,wG sAREA BEDROOII M BEDROOM2 ❑ ❑ ota ❑ LIVING AREA BEDROOM 2 LIVING AREA rL ❑ asx„z S FEDERICO �BEDRCOM UNIT ❑ ❑ ❑ ASSOCIATES ❑ I., TYPE'BUNIT ------------------- 6 2 BEDROOM UNIT TYPE'A'UNIT :i xlro e'- 1” ❑ -- 9 ❑ BOWRIDGE FeeiD oo z BEDRooM uN�T ❑ RELLC ALTY �� ❑ Ma xy TYPE'B'UN17 MEGH eo°a O e e ❑ sl NECK zKIT nHa e' 31 _ zne 79RUCE ID1L WUftT %EA6ANTV W.E,N.Y.Ifd70 00 y LAUNDRY LAUND Y e EryTR0 ENTRY �'❑ EDD ❑ o ❑ :ITCH,E: BOWMAN BEDROOM 2 PLAZA - e.ssF o �0 BABBEBPLACE ftYE eft001'N Y I DQIl 4 KITCHEN ❑ ❑ ❑ 00 ENTRY ENTRY ENTRY LA UND KITCHEN I LAUND 2 O� R I 0 xz-z' $ a w N °MEG°Hz tMEGH MECHY ❑ - - - - ELEVATORKI o o L THIRD FLOOR x an Ka sCx sen ❑ 0 0 ED PLAN I FE�Et �''' ❑$ ° 1 BEDROOM UNIT p 1 BEDROOM UNIT 2 BEDROOM UNIT n N,asa 1 1:1TYPE'B'UNIT TYPE'B'UNIT ❑ EµEo,iq 6 o a ❑ OF NEB BEDROOM BEDROOMS BEDROOMS ❑ E 1os.1oe asn+zs [:] LIVING A� RFA sn.zs LMN6 6REA El z sae x so.e z so.e ❑ ` TERRACE ,vp TERRACE ,rp TERRACE LIVING Al2€A �to.t zao.t �t�t TOTAL FLOOR AREA: — THIRD FLOOR PLAN SCALE:1/4'-I-T z A6 OF y FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. PLANNING, TRANSPORTATION, ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT RYE, NEW YORK FAIRFIELD,CONNECTICUT DAVID H.STOLMAN MEMORANDUM AICP,PP PRESIDENT To: Gary Zuckerman, Chairman, and the MICHAEL A. GALANTE EXECUTIVE Planning g y Board of the Village of Rye Brook VICE PRESIDENT 35o THEO.FREMDAVE. Date: May 7, 2015 RYE, NEW YORK 1058o 914 967-6540 FAX: 914 967-6615 Subject: 8 Edgewood Drive - Application for CONNECTICUT Approval of a Site Plan and Wetlands Permit 203 255-3100 HUDSON VALLEY As requested, we reviewed revised plans and new documents submitted by 845 297-6056 8 Edgewood Drive, LLC, on behalf of Frank Chiarello, property owner, for LONG ISLAND approval of a site plan and a Permit to Perform Regulated Activities in a 5i6 364-4544 Wetland to demolish the existing single-family home and construct a new www.fpclark.c0m single-family home, rear patio, driveway, parking court, and curb cut at 8 email@fpclark.com Edgewood Drive in the R-25 District, Section 135.28, Block 1, Lot 28 on the Town of Rye Tax Assessor's Map. Property Description The 31,906.5 square-foot property is currently developed with a split-level single-family residence with a lower-level attached garage, retaining walls along the driveway, a driveway and curb cut, walkways, and a patio and brick barbeque in the rear yard. The property slopes down approximately 17 feet from the northeast corner of the property in the rear yard to the southwest corner of the front yard. The current residence, retaining walls, driveway, curb cut, walkways, and the rear-yard patio are located within the 100-foot regulated buffer of a stream and wetlands that occupy approximately one half of the rear of the lot and small areas along both sides of the front yard. The brick barbeque is located within the flagged wetland. There is an area of steep slopes at the back of the rear yard. Mature landscape plantings are located throughout the lot. Project Description The Applicant proposes to demolish the existing home and site-structures to construct a new two-story, single-family home and attached garage in FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. PLANNING, TRANSPORTATION, ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT RYE, NEW YORK FAIRFIELD, CONNECTICUT approximately the same location and the current dwelling. The proposed garage, curb cut and drive way will be relocated to the north side of the front yard from the south side of the front yard, and a parking court will be added to the area in front of the new garage. The front yard of the new home will be graded to raise the elevation of the front yard and the grade around the front of the home by two to three feet. Review We reviewed application materials and plans submitted by the Applicant that include the following items: 1. Exterior Building Permit Application dated 11/24/14 2. Building Permit Checklist and Zoning Analysis 3. Site Plan Application and Checklist 4. Short Environmental Assessment Form 5. Letter to the Planning Board from Bibbo Associates LLP, Somers, N.Y. dated April 20, 2015 6. Letter to the Planning Board from Bibbo Associates LLP, Somers, N.Y. dated November 6, 2014 7. Letter to the Planning Board from Bibbo Associates LLP, Somers, N.Y. dated October 30, 2014 8. EPA On-Scene-Coordinator's Bulletins for Port Refinery, 55 Hillandale, Rye Brook, N.Y. 9. Environmental Site Remediation Database Search for Barbera Residence a.k.a Port Refinery Superfund Site 10.Engineer's Report prepared by Bibbo Associates LLP, Somers, N.Y. dated July 16, 2014 11.Memorandum to the Planning Board from the Building and Fire Inspector dated August 18, 2014 12.Wetlands Functional Capacity Report prepared by Evans Associates, Inc., Bethany, C.T. dated September 12, 2014 13.Wetlands Delineation Report prepared by Evans Associates, Inc., Bethany, C.T. dated April 29, 2014 14.Title Survey prepared by Edward G. Mihalczo Land Surveyor, LLC, Yonkers, N.Y. dated May 29, 2013 15.Topographic Survey, prepared by Edward G. Mihalczo Land Surveyor, LLC, Yonkers, N.Y. dated July 12, 2013 last revision April 10, 2014 16.Engineer's Plans, prepared by Bibbo Associates LLP, Somers, N.Y.: 2 FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. PLANNING, TRANSPORTATION, ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT RYE, NEW YORK FAIRFIELD, CONNECTICUT Sheet Number Sheet Title Dated SP-1 Site Plan 10/21/13 rev. 4/17/15 TPPP Tree Preservation and Protection Plan 10/21/13 rev. 4/17/15 EC Erosion Control Plan 10/21/13 rev. 10/30/14 D-1 Details 10/21/13 rev. 4/9/15 HSP-1 Height/Setback Plan 8/16/14 rev. 10/30/14 Lrl Landscape and Lighting Plan 10/3/14 rev. 12/17/14 17.Builder's Plans, prepared by Ritz-Craft Corporation: Sheet Number Sheet Title Dated ELVA Elevations 10/24/14 FPI First Floor Plan 10/08/14 FP2 Second Floor Plan 10/08/14 FD Foundation Design Criteria 10/24/14 X1 Section 10/24/14 Please note that our review is limited to planning, zoning and environmental issues. Each of the unresolved comments from our December 9, 2014 memorandum is followed by our new comments written in bold italic script. We offer the following additional comments regarding the application: 1. Zoning. According to the Fire and Building Inspector's August 18, 2014 zoning analysis, the proposed site plan includes two zoning non-conformities: a. The minimum front yard for the lot is 158.75 feet; the proposed site plan has a front yard set back of 77.2 feet; b. The maximum allowable side-yard height/setback ratio is 1.30; the proposed height/setback ratio for the south elevation of the new home is 1.80. We continue to recommend that the Applicant reconsider the design of the home to reduce or eliminate the variances that are required from the Zoning Board of Appeals. The Applicant shifted the location of the home closer to the south property line, which eliminated the non-conforming side height/setback ratio. The Applicant also located the home further away from the front property line and received a 3 FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. PLANNING, TRANSPORTATION, ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT RYE, NEW YORK FAIRFIELD, CONNECTICUT 76.75 foot variance from the Zoning Board of Appeals for an 82 foot front yard. The revised site plan dated 4117115 includes the 82 foot front yard and the side yard modification. 2. Hazardous Materials. According to the letter to the Planning Board from Bibbo Associates, dated October 30, 2014, a hazardous material site is located within 2,000 feet of the subject property. The site, which was remediated, is 55 Hillandale, the property that was the source of elemental mercury that required remediation of several properties, including 55 Hillandale, in 2006. The Applicant should provide details regarding the completed remediation and any subsequent remediation or investigative activity in the area, if any, for review. An NYSDEC data base search regarding the Port Refinery Superfund Site at 55 Hillandale Road was submitted along with the U.S. EPA On-Scene Coordinator Bulletins for the cleanup of the 55 Hillandale Road 2004 mercury spill. The documents provided indicated that the environmental cleanup initiated by the 55 Hillandale Road spill did not extend into or close to the property located at 8 Edgewood Drive. 3. Wetlands. A Permit to Perform Regulated Activities in a wetland will be required. All of the proposed construction for the new home and grading would occur in the wetland buffer regulated by the Village. The Evans Associates delineation report and the functional capacity report state that the wetland/stream may be regulated by the Army Corps of Engineers. However, other than removal of an existing masonry grill and landscape plant installation, no grading or other construction work will occur in the flagged wetland and the Army Corps does not regulate wetland buffers. To ensure that no construction activities would create disturbances to the wetland/stream we recommend that limit-of-construction fencing should be located along the entire flagged wetland boundary throughout the entire demolition and construction process to exclude heavy machinery, materials and debris stockpiles from the wetland to avoid soil compaction and polluted water run-off into the wetland. A note was added to Sheet SP-1 specifying the installation of limit-of-construction fencing along the entire flagged wetland boundary to be in place throughout the demolition and construction process, which adequately responds to our comment regarding disturbance and construction activities in the wetland 4 FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. PLANNING, TRANSPORTATION, ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT RYE, NEW YORK FAIRFIELD, CONNECTICUT The mitigation proposed for the loss of wetland buffer should include removal of invasive plant species and inorganic debris from the wetland and buffer along with improvement of the functionality of the buffer by the installation of trees and shrubs and the removal of lawn in the wetland and the adjacent wetland buffer at a 2:1 ratio of mitigation to buffer area lost to impervious surface coverage. The application states that a total of 3,696 square feet of impervious surface coverage would be located in the buffer after construction. Therefore, a total of 7,392 square feet of mitigation should be provided. Disturbance of the buffer, such as construction of impervious surfaces, grading, removal of mature trees, and alteration of the drainage patterns on the property should be minimized. According to the October 30, 2014 letter to the Planning Board from Bibbo Associates, the current mitigation plan provides 4,741 square feet of mitigation plantings. The April 20, 2015 correspondence from Bibbo Associates states that the revised site plan would construct 3,940 square feet of impervious surfaces within the wetland buffer, which would require 7,880 square feet of mitigation in the buffer or wetland The Applicant continues to propose 4,741 square feet of mitigation plantings, which is less than the required mitigation. The revised site plan also includes removal of invasive plant species and inorganic debris from the wetland and wetland buffer. To ensure that the new wetland mitigation plantings are not disturbed or removed, we recommend locating fencing or another method to physically locate the limits of the proposed mitigation plantings and limit activities within the wetland in future. The revised site plan specifies the installation of a two foot high fence along the edge of the wetland to locate the limits of the proposed mitigation plantings and limit activities within the wetland in future, which adequately responds to our comment. 4. Grading Plan. Although the steep slopes in the rear yard will not be disturbed by the construction of the new home, it appears that the grading plan will create new steep slopes in the front and side yards of new home. To comply with the requirements of Chapter 213 of the Village Code regarding steep slopes and determine if a Steep Slopes Work Permit is required, we continue to request a slope analysis of the proposed grading plan to determine the total area of steep slopes that would be created on the lot. The disturbance of steep slopes and the creation of new steep slopes should be the minimum required to construct a proposed site plan. 5 FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. PLANNING, TRANSPORTATION, ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT RYE, NEW YORK FAIRFIELD, CONNECTICUT The current grading plan would raise the grade of the front yard and one side yard by two to three feet, require additional disturbance of the buffer and alter the drainage patterns into the wetland, which is a significant disturbance of the buffer. We understand from the October 30, 2014 Bibbo letter that the grading in the front yard would not require the importation of fill. However, we still recommend that the Applicant reconsider the grading plan to reduce or eliminate raising the grade of the front yard, eliminate the creation of new steep slopes, alteration of drainage patterns into the wetland, and reduce the proposed disturbance of the buffer. The revised site plan and proposed retaining wall eliminates the creation of new steep slopes on the property, so that a steep slopes permit is not required 5. Tree Preservation and Protection. Pending review by the Village Engineer, the site plan proposes removal of one regulated 24-inch diameter maple from the rear yard, which will require planting one 2 to 2.5-inch caliper hardwood shade tree as a replacement. Our comment remains unchanged The proposed replacement tree should be added to the landscape plan plant list and located on the landscape plan. We recommend planting a suitable species of native hardwood shade tree within the wetland 6. Landscape Plan. The landscape plan, which includes mitigation plantings for the loss of wetland buffer area, should be revised to comply with the required mitigation area of 7,392 square feet, and include a hardwood shade tree as a replacement for the 24-inch diameter maple to be removed. As all new plantings on the site will be located in the regulated wetland buffer and in the wetland, the plants selected for the plan should be non-invasive native trees, shrubs and ground covers that are indigenous to the northeast. The current landscape plan appears to include invasive plant species that should be removed from the plan (the myrtle and possibly the viburnum. However, the plan does not, and should include, a complete plant schedule that lists plant quantities, plant species names (scientific and common), and plant sizes and condition at installation so that a definitive identification of proposed plant species can be made. With the exception of the missing hardwood replacement tree discussed in Comment 5, the landscape plan was revised to adequately respond to our comments. 6 FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. PLANNING, TRANSPORTATION, ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT RYE, NEW YORK FAIRFIELD, CONNECTICUT We look forward to discussion with the Planning Board. Marilyn Timpone-Mohamed, ASLA, AICP Senior Associate/Planning/Environment cc: Honorable Mayor and the Village Board of Trustees Christopher Bradbury, Village Administrator Michal Nowak, Superintendent of Public Works/Village Engineer Philip A. Butler, Esq., Village Attorney Bibbo Associates LLC, for the Applicant J•IDOCS2 1500 1Rye Brook1538.644.8 Edgewood Drive Site Plan.nienio3.mtm.doem 7 Building Permit Check List & Zoning Analysis Address: ISO r - SBL: G S,7,& - t ^Z a Zone: '2,- ZS Use: Zl o Const.Type: Other: Z l`( tv 3 l ( " h /14f Submittal Date: -7 Revisions Submittal Dates: 11 z 1 Applicant: _.Z-C e-%A n OT> [-LC- Nature of Work: ^LC-NatureofWork: N'F LF_ XY 17 Reviews:ZBA' A I l G, - 4 7 014 PB: BP: Other: NEED OK ( ) FEES: Filing: 7S-! r BP: C/O: Legalization: APP.: Date Stamped: ," Properly Signed: ✓ SBL Verified:-f Other: (� ( ) Scenic Roads: Steep Slopes: Wetlands: Storm Water Review: Street Opening: ( ) (� ENVI .O.: Long: Short: ./ Fees: Z r N/A: ( ) ( ) SITE PLAN: Topo: Sia Protection: S/W Mgmt.: Tree Plan: Other: ( ) ( SURVEY: Dated: S Z ► 3 Current: wo"' Archival: Sealed: .e Unacceptable: ( ) (,,Y' PLANS: Date Stamped: ✓ Sealed: ✓' Copies: .Q.;- Incomplete: N/A: Other: (� ( ) License: - -_Workers Comp: Liability: Comp. Waiver: Other: ( ( ) Code 753#: Dated: N/A: HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRICAL: Plans: Permit: N/A: Other: ( ) ( ) LOW-VOLTAGE ELECTRICAL: Plans: Permit: N/A: Other: (� ( ) FIRE ALARM/SMOKE DETECTORS: Plans: Permit: N/A: Other: PLUMBING: Plans: Permit: ` Nat. Gas: LP Gas: N/A/: Other: FIRE SUPPRESSION: Plans: .: Permit: N/A: Other: ( ( ) 2010 NY State ECCC: N/A:� Other: (� ( ) Final Survey: Final Topo: RAPE Sign-off Letter: As-Built Plans: Other: ( ) ( ) BP DENIAL LETTER: C/O DEMAL LETTER: Other: — (�/) ( ) Other: !c7% 1�ci�� -� _ � n,••.r,moi E _ _ ( ARB mtg. date: approval: notes: mtg. date: Z �c approval: _ notes: I - O z (-'PB mtg.date: t 7- 1 1 4- approval: notes: .F . -122 :-Z A REQUIRED EXISTING PROPOSED NOTES . Area: Zr k j �� .� - - Circle: 97-57 (COQ td9 Frontage: 4o Front: Front: LS 9, T 7 .'L 23 Z - ij , Sides: is Lo 6.z Acvlr Rear:_ _"�o Main Cov: _.------- DF-6k Cov: Ft.WSb: . At8 Sd.H/Sb: S 3 ! 4rW GFA: zs Tot. 3 30?6 - It4�-,Wr Q2 Ft. Imp: Zo ► .7 �c, '�aL►_ Parking' 2- Hei t/Stories: 1,Q Z notes: !u — -S - ti fY 200 i►.) U LA W CF C41A n J'n► wsr. — 1 �aG�t l A-.,L 14-t Co J . y ni SIJ C�GO'°C't CCL Eto � VC V4 VYYf . . 19 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK MAYOR 938 King Street,Rye Brook, N.Y. 10573 ADMINISTRATOR Paul S.Rosenberg (914)939-0668 Fax(914) 939-5801 Christopher J. Bradbury www.ryebrook.ora TRUSTEES BUILDING&FIRE Susan R.Epstein INSPECTOR David M.Heiser Michael J. Izzo Jason A. Klein Jeffrey B. Rednick NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL Application# 14-023 December 15, 2014 8 Edgewood Drive LLC Mr. Frank Chiarello 875 Mamaroneck Avenue Mamaroneck,New York 10543 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that your revised application for building permit dated November 25, 2014, for the premises located at 8 Edgewood Drive,Parcel ID# 135.28-1-28, has been disapproved because of non- compliance with the following section(s) of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook: § 250-19.1.G(1)(a)[1] The minimum required front yard setback is 158.75 feet. The applicant proposes to construct the new home with a 77.2 foot front yard setback. § 250-19.1.I(2) The maximum allowable side height setback ratio is 1.30.The applicant proposes to construct the new house with a 1.71 side height setback ratio. Please revise your plans to fully comply with the applicable section(s) of Village Code, or an appeal to this decision may be brought before the Village Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA) in accordance with §250-13 and §250-40 of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook. Applications to appear before the ZBA are available at the Building Department or online at www.rvebrook.org. Since ly, Mi ael J o Buil Fire Inspector mizzo@gyebrook.org i BIBBO ASSOCIATES, L.L.P. Joseph J. Buschynski, P.E. Timothy S. Allen, P.E. Consulting Engineers Sabri Barisser, P.E. April 20, 2015 Village of Rye Brook Planning Board 938 King Street Rye Brook, NY 10573 ATTN: Gary Zuckerman, Chairman RE: Site Plan 8 Edgewood LLC 8 Edgewood Drive Sheet: 135.38 Blk: I Lot: 28 Dear Members of the Department: On behalf of our client, please find enclosed the following for your review and approval: • 11 Sets—Site Plan, last revised 4-17-2015 • 11 Sets—Tree Preservation and Protection Plan, last revised 4-17-2015 • 11 Sets—Details, last revised 4-17-2015 • 11 Sets—Landscaping and Mitigation Planting Plan/Lighting Plan, dated 12-17-2014 • 11 Sets—New York State DEC 55 Hillandale Road Site Records 0 11 Sets—EPA On-Scene Coordinator 55 Hillandale Road Weekly Updates • 1 Engineer's Report, dated 4-17-2015 • 1 Electronic Set of Plans The project was recently submitted to the Rye Brook Zoning Board of Appeals and accepted for a front yard setback variance. Our office has revised the plans pursuant to the December 9, 2014 memorandum prepared by the Planner. We offer the following responses for the Board's consideration: 1. The project was recently in front of the Zoning Board of Appeals on April 7, 2015 and a variance from the 158.75 foot front yard setback was granted for the proposed 82 foot front yard setback. The need for a side yard height to setback variance was eliminated with a revision to the house plans.The side yard height to setback ratio is now compliant with the Town Code. 2. The New York State DEC Site Records and the EPA On-Scene Coordinator Weekly Updates have been provided for the remediation of 55 Hillandale Road for your review. 3. A note has been added to the Site Plan stating, "Construction fencing will be located along the entire flagged wetland boundary throughout the entire demolition and construction process to exclude heavy machinery, materials,debris and stockpiles from the wetland." The construction sequence now involves the removal of invasive plant species and inorganic debris from the wetland and wetland buffer. The total existing impervious coverage located in the Site Design . Environmental Mill Pond Offices 293 Route 100, Suite 203 • Somers. NY 10589 Phone: 914-277-5805 Fax: 914-277-8210 • E-Mail: bibbo®optonline.net T buffer is 3,076 square feet and the proposed total impervious coverage is 3,940 square feet creating a total of 864 square feet of new impervious coverage. We have provided approximately 4,741 square feet of mitigation plantings and believe that this is adequate for this project. The construction sequence incorporates the placement of a 2 foot high fence to serve as demarcation to be placed around the mitigation areas for protection in the future. 4. The steep slopes have been removed from the plans.The grading on the Northwest portion of the driveway has been replaced with a stone wall and the grading on the Southeast of the house has been modified. The proposed grading has been provided to allow proper separation from ground water where the proposed infiltration system is located. The house elevation is currently at the lowest elevation for the infiltration system and footing drains to be functional. 5. The Tree Preservation and Protection Plan has been modified to add the note referencing the Town Code Restoration 235-18. A replacement tree with a 2 to 2.5-inch diameter at breast height will be planted for the removal of one regulated 24-inch maple. 6. The Exterior Lighting Plan now specifies with a note the lighting to be used on site.The lighting will be standard residential lighting with proper shielding to eliminate sky lighting and lateral glare for the neighboring properties. 7. The Landscape Plan now contains no invasive species.The plan shows replacement trees for the removal of the 24 inch maple. A complete Plant Schedule has been added to the plan. We respectfully request this matter be placed on your next agenda for consideration. Ver yours, Timo by S. Allen, P.E. TSA/neh cc: 8 Edgewood LLC BIBBO ASSOCIATES, LLP Consulting Engineers- Planners 4/17/2015 Engineer's Report 8 Edkewood, LLC 8 Edgewood Drive Prepared By: OF NFA �P HY S � co 0 r 07 per+ 101 Rev. 411711015 imothy S. Allen, P.E. Date: 711611014 N.Y.S. License A 073434 Engineer's Report 8 Edgewood,LLC BIBBO ASSOCIATES, LLP Consulting Engineers - Planners 4/172015 Proiect Information: Project Title: 8 Edgewood,LLC Project Address: 8 Edgewood Drive Tax Map Number: 135.28-1-28 Project Area: 31,906.5 sf. +/- Owner/Applicant Information: 8 Edgewood, LLC c/o Frank Chiarello 875 Mamaroneck Ave. Suite 401 Mamaroneck, NY 10543 EiWneer Information: Timothy S. Allen, P.E. Bibbo Associates,LLP 293 Rt. 100, Suite 203 Somers,N.Y. 10589 914-277-5805 x11 914-277-8210 tallen@bibboassociates.com Engineer's Report 8 Edgewood,LLC BIBBO ASSOCIATES, LLP Consulting Engineers- Planners 4117/1015 Enclosed herewith are the stormwater calculations for the proposed site redevelopment at 8 Edgewood Drive, located in the Village of Rye Brook. The site is located on the northeast side of Edgewood Drive and is surrounded by residential development. Currently there is an existing single family residence served by an asphalt driveway, an individual septic system, and public water system. No stormwater treatment system exists at the site. The site consists of a hillside slope which transitions down to a mildly sloped area where the existing residence is located. The soils on the property consist primarily of Woodbridge and Paxton loams which belong to hydrologic group C. A soil map has been provided herewith. A wetland forms a"U" shape around the house and discharges into the roadside drainage system. The site is located within the Long Island Sound Watershed. The applicant is proposing to remove the existing house and construct a new single family residence along with relocating the access driveway. Connecting to the existing public sewer and water systems will be required. The proposed site disturbance is 0.4 acres. A stormwater infiltration system is proposed to treat stormwater from the roof drains of the residence. The infiltration system consists of 8 Cultec Recharger 150XLHD chambers situated in a gravel bed. Details for all the drainage improvements can be found on the plan. This system is sized to capture and store the 1 year storm generated by HYDROCAD. An overflow pipe which outlets through a proposed drain manhole is connected to the existing catch basin on Edgewood Drive to the south to allow the larger storm events to pass. The site, as it exists, contains 3,076 sq.ft. of untreated impervious surfaces. The proposed development will create 3,940 sq.ft. of impervious surfaces of which 2,098 sq. ft. is able to be captured and treated in the stormwater treatment system. This reduces the amount of runoff from impervious surfaces and the site as a whole in all storm events up to and including the 100 year storm event. The following is a summary of the peak flows for the major storm events: Engineer's Report 8 Edgewood,LLC BIBBO ASSOCIATES, LLP F Consulting Engineers -Planners 4/172015 TABLE A PEAK RUNOFF RATES (cfs) STORM 1 YEAR 10 YEAR 25 YEAR 100 YEAR FREQUENCY PRE 0.6 1.8 2.6 4.2 POST 0.5 1.5 2.3 4.1 CHANGE -0.1 -0.3 -0.3 -0.1 % -16.7% 1 -16.7% 1 -11.5% -2.4% Engineer's Report 8 Edgewood,LLC in BIBBO ASSOCIATES, LLP Consulting Engineers - Planners 4/172015 Drainage and Infiltrator Sizing Calculations Engineer's Report 8 Edgewood,LLC mom BIBBO ASSOCIATES, LLP Consulting Engineers- Planners 4/17/2015 Drainage and Infiltrator Sizing Calculations Engineer's Report 8 Edgewood,LLC PRE- 1 PRE- DEVd.LOPMENT DP DESIGN POINT Subcat Reach on�� Link Drainage Diagram for 8 Edgewood-Pre 4-16-15 Prepared by Bibbo Associates, LLP, Printed 4/16/2015 HydroCAD®8.50 s/n 002227 0 2007 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 8 Edgewood-Pre 416-15 Prepared by Bibbo Associates, LLP Printed 4/16/2015 2:22:17 PM HydroCAD®8.50 s/n 002227 ®2007 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Area Listing(all nodes) Area CN Description (sq-ft) (subcatchment-numbers) 13,155 70 Woods,Good,HSG C (PRE-1) 15,676 74 >75%Grass cover,Good,HSG C (PRE-1) 3,076 98 Paved parking&roofs (PRE-1) 51,907 TOTALAREA 8 Edgewood-Pre 416-15 Prepared by Bibbo Associates, LLP Printed 4/16/2015 2:22:17 PM HydroCAD®8.50 s/n 002227 ©2007 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Soil Listing(all nodes) Area Soil Subcatchment (sq-ft) Goup Numbers 0 HSG A 0 HSG B 28,831 HSG C PRE-1 0 HSG D 3,076 Other PRE-1 31,907 TOTAL AREA 8 Edgewood-Pre 416-15 711pe X 24-hr 1 -yr/WQV Rainfall=2.90" Prepared by Bibbo Associates, LLP Printed 4/16/2015 2:22:17 PM HydroCADO 8.50 s/n 002227 ©2007 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Time span=0.00-96.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs,9601 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method,UH=SCS Reach routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method Subcatchment PRE-1:PRE-DEVELOPMENT RunoffArea=31,907 sf 9.64%Impervious Runoff Depth=0.90" Flow Length--355' Tc--12.1 min CN=75 Runoff--0.6 ds 2,382 cf Reach DP:DESIGN POINT Inflow--0.6 cis 2,382 cf Outflow--0.6 ds 2,382 cf Total Runoff Area=31,907 sf Runoff Volume=2,382 cf Average Runoff Depth=0.90" 90.36%Pervious=28,831 sf 9.64%Impervious=3,076 sf 8 Edgewood-Pre 416-15 Type Ili 24-hr 1 -yr/WQV Rainfall=2.90" Prepared by Bibbo Associates, LLP Printed 4/16/2015 2:22:17 PM HydroCADS 8.50 s/n 002227 ©2007 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment PRE-1: PRE-DEVELOPMENT Runoff = 0.6 cfs® 12.18 hrs, Volume= 2,382 cf, Depth= 0.90" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method,UH=SCS,Time Span=0.00-96.00 hrs,dt=0.01 hrs Type III 24-hr 1 -yr/WQV Rainfall=2.90" Area(sf) CN Description 13,155 70 Woods,Good,HSG C 3,076 98 Paved parking&roofs 15,676 74 >75% Grass cover,Good,HSG C 31,907 75 Weighted Average 28,831 Pervious Area 3,076 Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.3 100 0.1130 0.16 Sheet Flow, Woods:Light underbrush n=0.400 P2=3.50" 0.2 13 0.0769 1.39 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Woodland Kv=5.0 fps 1.6 242 0.0293 2.57 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Grassed Waterway Kv= 15.0 fps 12.1 355 Total Subcatchment PRE-1: PRE-DEVELOPMENT Hydrograph 0.65 ------ ----- --- ------- I I I I I I I I I I I I I -0..6 cfs - 1 I I I I Runoff 0.6 _ J---L---1---1---L--J---L-__I-__J---L---I---1---L------1___I • I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0.55 ------1I I �I iI II 1I II �I iI TypeI lll-�4-IhrI V- I I I I I I I I 0.5 ---;---;- -;---;---;---,---;---,---;---;---;---;---;---Rainfatl=2.90'-' 1 I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0.45 ------ - --- --- -- --- --- -- --- ---;Rujrrof are0=31, 07sf I I I I I I I Iy�p�I ;I�� I}�-� I II II-e�I Q/�I 0.4 ------7- -I---i---,----I--- ---i---I---T-f Run-off Y0jY�e#2q-382TCf I I I I I I I I I w I I I 11 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0.35 ------T -I---1---r---I----T---i--�---T-------/}��-- -- --- - rl-I I I I I I I I I I 1 ■ lu�o - I P I , - , I I I I 1 I I I I I I �+I I I I I I U. 0.3 ---.---i- -I---i---;---I---I I---i---r---------1 01, 0.25 Lien th,=3 5' I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I 0.25 ------r- -I---n---r---I---7---I---1---r---I---1--- min r---I--- --- r,---I I I 0.2 ------Y -I----I---r---I---Y---I---ti---t---I----I---r---I---t---r--y---II+/�---I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CN= 5 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I _ I 0.15 -------- -II----4I---fI -----+I ------II------"4I--------I---+I ---II I---+I ---I- 0.1 ------- 0.1 ------ 11I--- I�--- +I - 1---11I---1I 1I ---I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0.05 ______1 __ __J___L---I-__-4---I-__J_--L---I-__ ___L-_-I--- 0 -_0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 60 65 90 95 Time (hours) 8 Edgewood-Pre 416-15 Type III 24-hr 1 -yr/WfQ'V Rainfall=2.90" Prepared by Bibbo Associates, LLP Printed 4/16/2015 2:22:17 PM HydroCAD®8.50 s/n 002227 m 2007 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Reach DP: DESIGN POINT Inflow Area= 31,907 sf, 9.64% Impervious, Inflow Depth= 0.90" for 1 -yr/WQV event Inflow = 0.6 cfs® 12.18 hrs, Volume= 2,382 cf Outflow = 0.6 cfs® 12.18 hrs, Volume= 2,382 cf, Atten=0%, Lag=0.0 min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method,Time Span=0.00-96.00 hrs,dt=0.01 hrs Reach DP: DESIGN POINT Hydrograph 0.65 ---'-- - - - -- -- -- - - -- - ------- -- ------ ------- 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I _ I I I I I I I 1 I I I Inflow 0.6 _____ �.6 Cfs 1---L__J---L___I___1---L__J---L---I---1___L__J---L---I___1 I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Outflow 0.55 ------L- _I___1___I____1___L___I_-- 1 --- Llnflorw �Area34;907-Sf- I I 1 I I I I • I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0.5 ------I-- -1----'-------1--- ---I--- ---I----I---I---I--- I----I--- ---1----1--- j. I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I 0.45 i I I I j I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I _----_I I -- I __-I----I---I ---I--- 1 -------I---1 I 1 I 0.4 I -I- I I I I I 1 I I F---I I ---F--t---T-- I---� IA I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I w ______I I I I I I I I I I 11 I I I 0.35 r- -I----r---�---I---r---I---T---r---�---r---I---r---r--�---r---I---r 2 1 I I I I I I I I I I 1 I 0.3 ------r -1---7---r---i---r---I---T---r---I---r---I---T---r---1---r---1---r LL I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I 1 1 I 1 I I I 0.25 ______r _1___T___r__-1---r---1___T---r__,---r---I---T___r__1---r---1___T 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0.2 ______ _1___+___r __ -__t.___1___t___r__y---rI_ ___ __t---r__yr ___ ___1___t I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0.15 ---'--- --'+--- ---+---�--'I---�'---1---+ I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I 0.1 ------} -1---+---1--- ---E'---1---'}--- ---I---I----1---+---1--- --- ---1---+ I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I 0.05 J___L___1___1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 Time (hours) 8 Edgewood-Pre 416-15 711pe III 24-hr 10-yr Rainfaff=5.10" Prepared by Bibbo Associates, LLP Printed 4/16/2015 2:22:17 PM HydroCADS 8.50 s/n 002227 ©2007 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Time span=0.00-96.00 hrs,dt=0.01 hrs, 9601 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method,UH=SCS Reach routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method Subeatchment PRE-1:PRE-DEVELOPMENT RunoffArea=31,907 of 9.64%Impervious Runoff Depth=2.53" Flow Length=355' Tc--12.1 min CN=75 Runoff=1.8 cfs 6,729 cf Reach DP:DESIGN POINT Inflow=1.8 cis 6,729 cf Outflow=1.8 cis 6,729 cf Total Runoff Area=31,907 of Runoff Volume=6,729 cf Average Runoff Depth=2.53" 90.36%Pervious=28,831 of 9.64%Impervious=3,076 of S Edgewood-Pre 416-15 71ype 1U 24-hr 10-yr Rainfall=5.10" Prepared by Bibbo Associates, LLP Printed 4/16/2015 2:22:17 PM HydroCAD®8.50 s/n 002227 0 2007 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment PRL-1: PRL-DEVELOPMENT Runoff = 1.8 cfs® 12.17 hrs, Volume= 6,729 cf, Depth= 2.53" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method,UH=SCS,Time Span=0.00-96.00 hrs,dt=0.01 hrs Type III 24-hr 10-yr Rainfall=5.10" Area(sfl CN Description 13,155 70 Woods,Good,HSG C 3,076 98 Paved parking&roofs 15,676 74 >75% Grass cover,Good,HSG C 31,907 75 Weighted Average 28,831 Pervious Area 3,076 Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description _ (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.3 100 0.1130 0.16 Sheet Flow, Woods:Light underbrush n=0.400 P2=3.50" 0.2 13 0.0769 1.39 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Woodland Kv=5.0 fps 1.6 242 0.0293 2.57 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Grassed Waterway Kv= 15.0 fps 12.1 355 Total Subcatchment PRE-1: PRE-DEVELOPMENT Hydrograph F-1.8 cis i i i i i "Runoff I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Type III 24-hr 10 - yr I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I � Rainfall=�.1 nll I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Runoff Areal=311,907 sf I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I R�nOff �/ollu n�e-16,7,29;cf I I I I I I I I I I �I I 1 ! I C 1 ------T- -r-- ---i---r---I---i---r--i---r--Ilurtoff Depth=2.531 LL I I I I 1 I I I 1 I 1 I I Fjovy Length=355' 355' I I I I I I I I I I I I - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ry_- I I �rII I I I I I TV-12.1 n1in I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I V I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I /� � I I I I I I I I I I I ■ _ =1/5 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I VV}- I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I l I 01 I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I 1 I I I 1 I I I 1 I I I 0 5 10 15 20 25 3,0,---35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 Time (hours) 8 Edgewood-Pre 416-15 Type III 24-hr 10-yr Rainfall=5.10" Prepared by Bibbo Associates, LLP Printed 4/16/2015 2:22:17 PM HydroCAD®8.50 s/n 002227 ®2007 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Reach DP: DESIGN POINT Inflow Area= 31,907 sf, 9.640A Impervious, Inflow Depth= 2.53" for 10-yr event Inflow = 1.8 cis® 12.17 hrs, Volume= 6,729 cf Outflow = 1.8 cfs® 12.17 hrs, Volume= 6,729 cf, Atten=0%, Lag=0.0 min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method,Time Span=0.00-96.00 hrs,dt=0.01 hrs Reach DP: DESIGN POINT Hydrograph 1.8 CfS ' _Inflow I I I I I I I I I I I I Outflow I 1 I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ;Inflow Area=31;,907 of I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I _i___T_ _r__,___T___I___T___r___1___T___r__-I___T___r__,___T___I___T___f LL I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I • I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I 1 I I 4 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 I 1 I I I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I 1 I 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 Time (hours) 8 Edgewood-Pre 416-15 711pe III 24-hr 25-yr Rainfall=6.40" Prepared by Bibbo Associates, LLP Printed 4/16/2015 2:22:17 PM HydroCADO 8.50 s/n 002227 ©2007 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Time span=0.00-96.00 hrs,dt=0.01 hrs, 9601 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method,UH=SCS Reach routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method Subcatchment PRE-1:PRE-DEVELOPMENT RunoffArea=31,907 sf 9.64%Impervious RunoffDepth=3.63" Flow Length=355' Tc--12.1 min CN=75 Runoff=2.6 cfs 9,640 cf Reach DP:DESIGN POINT Inflow--2.6 cfs 9,640 cf Outflow--2.6 cis 9,640 cf Total Runoff Area=31,907 sf Runoff Volume=9,640 cf Average Runoff Depth=3.63" 90.36%Pervious=28,831 sf 9.64%Impervious=3,076 sf 8 Edgewood-Pre 416-15 711pe III 24-hr 25-yr Rainfall=6.40" Prepared by Bibbo Associates, LLP Printed 4/16/2015 2:22:17 PM HydroCAM 8.50 s/n 002227 0 2007 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment PRE-1: PRE-DEVELOPMENT Runoff = 2.6 cis® 12.17 hrs, Volume= 9,640 ef, Depth= 3.63" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method,UH=SCS,Time Span=0.00-96.00 hrs,dt=0.01 hrs Type III 24-hr 25-yr Rainfall=6.40" Area(sfl CN Description 13,155 70 Woods,Good,HSG C 3,076 98 Paved parking&roofs 15,676 74 >75% Grass cover,Good,HSG C 31,907 75 Weighted Average 28,831 Pervious Area 3,076 Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.3 100 0.1130 0.16 Sheet Flow, Woods:Light underbrush n=0.400 P2=3.50" 0.2 13 0.0769 1.39 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Woodland Kv=5.0 fps 1.6 242 0.0293 2.57 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Grassed Waterway Kv= 15.0 fps 12.1 355 Total Subcatchment PRE-1: PRE-DEVELOPMENT Hydrograph 2.6 cfs I I I I I I I I I Runoff I I I I I I I 1 I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I Type ISI 24-hr 25 - .yr • I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I Rai�fa;ll-- 0.40" I I I I I I I I I I 2 ------+- -F---1---I---I---1---+I ---I1----1I---+-------I---+---r--1---+---1---1 Runoff Area►=31,907 sf I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I w ROnoff YoWnr e=!9,6;40 ;cf I I I I I I v I I I I I I 1 I I I 1 I I I 1 I I I C Runoff Dpapth=3.63"I I I I I 1 1 I I I I , LL I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I F joW LOngth-355' I I I I I I I 1 ------+- - -- --- --- ---1---+--- -- ---_--- --- -+---(L.---+---+ --'----4 I I I I I I I TV-12.1 n1in I I 1 I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 CN-15 I • I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I — I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 1 I I I 1 I I I I 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 Time (hours) 8 Edgewood-Pre 416-15 Type IQ 24-hr 25-yr Rainfall=6.40" Prepared by Bibbo Associates, LLP Printed 4/16/2015 2:22:17 PM HydroCAD®8.50 s/n 002227 0 2007 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Reach DP: DESIGN POINT Inflow Area= 31,907 sf, 9.64% Impervious, Inflow Depth= 3.63" for 25-yr event Inflow = 2.6 cis® 12.17 hrs, Volume= 9,640 cf Outflow = 2.6 cfs® 12.17 hrs, Volume= 9,640 cf, Atten=0%, Lag=0.0 min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method,Time Span=0.00-96.00 hrs,dt=0.01 hrs Reach DP: DESIGN POINT Hydrograph 2.6 CfS I I Y Inflow I I I I I I I I I I I I Outflow I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I ;Inflow Area 31,907 sf I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I r---I----1 I 2 +- -r--�---+---I---+---r---1---Y---r---I---+---r---1--- r---r I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 I b 1 I I I 1 I 1 I I I I 1 I I 1 I 1 I v I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 3 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I LL I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -4___+___I___ ___ ___I___ I___4___� I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I 1 I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 Time (hours) 8 Edgewood-Pre 416-15 Type X 24-hr 100-yr Rainfall=9.00" Prepared by Bibbo Associates, LLP Printed 4/1672015 2:22:17 PM HydroCADG 8.50 s/n 002227 ®2007 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Time span=0.00-96.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs,9601 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method,UH=SCS Reach routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method Subcatchment PRE-1:PRE-DEVELOPMENT RunoffArea=31,907 sf 9.64%Impervious Runoff Depth=5.95" Flow Length=355' Tc--12.1 min CN=75 Runoff--4.2 cis 15,827 cf Reach DP:DESIGN POINT Inflow-4.2 cfs 15,827 cf Outflow--4.2 cis 15,827 cf Total Runoff Area=31,907 sf Runoff Volume= 15,827 cf Average Runoff Depth=5.95" 90.36%Pervious=28,831 sf 9.64%Impervious=3,076 sf 8 Edgewood-Pre 416-15 Type III 24-hr 100-yr Rainfall=9.00" Prepared by Bibbo Associates, LLP Printed 4/16/2015 2:22:17 PM HydroCAD®8.50 s/n 002227 ©2007 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment PRE-1: PRE-DEVELOPMENT Runoff = 4.2 cis 0 12.17 hrs, Volume= 15,827 cf, Depth= 5.95" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method,UH=SCS,Time Span=0.00-96.00 hrs,dt=0.01 hrs Type III 24-hr 100-yr Rainfall=9.00" Area(sfl CN Description 13,155 70 Woods,Good,HSG C 3,076 98 Paved parking&roofs 15,676 74 >75% Grass cover,Good,HSG C 31,907 75 Weighted Average 28,831 Pervious Area 3,076 Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.3 100 0.1130 0.16 Sheet Flow, Woods:Light underbrush n=0.400 P2=3.50" 0.2 13 0.0769 1.39 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Woodland Kv=5.0 fps 1.6 242 0.0293 2.57 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Grassed Waterway Kv= 15.0 fps 12.1 355 Total Subcatchment PRE-1: PRE-DEVELOPMENT Hydrograph 4.2 Cf$ II Runoff I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 4 ------ - -;----;---;---;---;---1---;----;---;--tJ. ype-ih-24=fir-1do--- yr 1 I I I I i I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I 1 I I I I Rainfall-9.00" i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 3 ______1_ _L__J___1___L___I___1___L__J_-_1Rnoff_ Are =31_, O7�sf� I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 Runoff V1I oiuImeI =*827;cf a I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Runoff Depth-I5.95I " I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 I It I I�O ' �en th-� 5' I LL 2 ------t- -r--y----r---r---1---t---r--ti---r---r-- - L � I I I I I I I I I I I � w I � � I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I/'� I Tc=12.1 1'i�in I I I I I I I I I I I /�I I I I I I I I I I I I I I . 1N=75 I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I V _I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I i] 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 Time (hours) 8 Edgewood-Pre 416-15 71jpe III 24-hr 100-yr Rainfall=9.00" Prepared by Bibbo Associates, LLP Printed 4/16/2015 2:22:17 PM H_ydroCADO 8.50 s/n 002227 ®2007 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Reach DP: DESIGN POINT Inflow Area= 31,907 sf, 9.64%Impervious, Inflow Depth= 5.95" for 100-yr event Inflow = 4.2 cis® 12.17 hrs, Volume= 15,827 cf Outflow = 4.2 cfs® 12.17 hrs, Volume= 15,827 cf, Atten=0%, Lag=0.0 min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method,Mme Span=0.00-96.00 hrs,dt=0.01 hrs Reach DP: DESIGN POINT Hydrograph 4.2 cis I I I I I I I I I I I I I =Inflow I I I I I I I I I I I I Outflow I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -- --- - -i- ---i---i--i---i---i--- ; n low Area=31 ,9Oig I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I 3 ---I-_-1_ _L__J___1___I___1___L---I-__1___L---1-__1___L__J__-.L---I-__1___L I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I U. ______ I I I I I I I 1 I I I 1 I 2 r.- -r---I---t---I----r---r---1---t---r---1---t---r---1---r---I---t---r I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ___1___i-__F---i--- _____7---f- ___1___T___I____I___�___1___i___r I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I ❑ 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 B0 85 90 95 Time (hours) P- 1 (PP-2 PO T 1 PO T 2 INFILv DP 150 Infiltrators DESIGN POINT Subcat Reach on Link Drainage Diagram for 8 Edgewood-Post 4-16-15 Prepared by Bibbo Associates, LLP, Printed 4/16/2015 HydroCADS 8.50 s/n 002227 0 2007 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 8 Edgewood-Post 416-15 Prepared by Bibbo Associates, LLP Printed 4/16/2015 2:23:14 PM HydroCADO 8.50 s/n 002227 ®2007 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Area Listing(all nodes) Area CN Description (sq-it) (subcatchment-numbers) 10,915 70 Woods,Good,HSG C (P-2) 7,350 71 Meadow,non-grazed,HSG C (P-2) 9,850 74 >75%Grass cover,Good,HSG C (P-2) 2,098 98 House (P-1) 1,694 98 Paved parking&roofs (P-2) 31,907 TOTALAREA 8 Edgewood-Post 416-15 Prepared by Bibbo Associates, LLP Printed 4/16/2015 2:23:14 PM HydroCADO 8.50 s/n 002227 ®2007 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Soil Listing(all nodes) Area Soil Subcatchment (sq-ft) Goup Numbers 0 HSG A 0 HSG B 28,115 HSG C P-2 0 HSG D 3,792 Other P-1,P-2 31,907 TOTAL AREA 8 Edgewood-Post 416-15 Type IQ 24-hr 1 -yr/WQV Rainfall=2.90" Prepared by Bibbo Associates, LLP Printed 4/16/2015 2:23:15 PM HydroCAD®8.50 s/n 002227 0 2007 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Time span=0.00-960.00 hrs,dt=0.01 hrs,96001 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method,UH=SCS Reach routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method Subcatchment P-1:POST 1 Runoff Area--2.098 sf 100.00°x6 Impervious Runoff Depth=2.67' Tc--6.0 min CN=98 Runoff=0.1 cis 467 cf Subcatchment P-2:POST 2 Runoff Area--29,809 sf 5.68%Impervious Runoff Depth=0.80" Flow Length=355' Tc--12.1 min CN=73 Runoff=0.5 cfs 1,979 cf Reach DP:DESIGN POINT Inflow--0.5 cfs 1,979 cf Outflow--0.5 cfs 1,979 cf Pond INFIL: 150 Infiltrators Peak Elev=200.32' Storage--268 cf Inflow=0.1 cfs 467 cf Discarded=0.0 cis 467 cf Primary--0.0 cfs 0 cf Outflow--0.0 cfs 467 cf Total Runoff Area=31,907 sf Runoff Volume=2,445 of Average Runoff Depth=0.92" 88.12%Pervious=28,115 sf 11.88%Impervious=3,792 sf 8 Edgewood-Post 416-15 Type III 24-hr 1 -yr/WQV Rainfall=2.90" Prepared by Bibbo Associates, LLP Printed 4/16/2015 2:23:15 PM HHvdroCAD®8.50 s/n 002227 ®2007 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment P-1: POST 1 Runoff = 0.1 cfs® 12.08 hrs, Volume= 467 cf, Depth= 2.67' Runoff by SCS TR-20 method,UH=SCS,Time Span=0.00-960.00 hrs,dt=0.01 hrs Type III 24-hr 1 -yr/WQV Rainfall=2.90" Area(so CN Description • 2,098 98 House 2,098 Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment P-1: POST 1 Hydrograph 0.15 ------------------------------------------ -- --- ------ --- ----------- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0.1 Cfs I I 1 -Runoff 0.14 - - -�---r---I---�---I---�---r---I---�---r---I---r---r------r---I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I 1 I I 0.13 ------' ^-'---'---'---'---'------ I I �V_� 0.12 Rainf611=2.90" 0.11 ---•---T ----7---r---I--- ---r--1---r---I----1---r---I---r---r--1---r---I 0.1 ------- - -------- ---1--- ---I--- --- ---I--Rux�aff;Arpa 2�(� Sf- I unoff -I oi6me= ■yJ�67,cf-� 0.09 ______1_ _I___J___L_ I1I � L--- I_ R W I I I I I I I •.. I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I J I 0.08 ------T ---- ---r---I I----r---r---1---r---1----Rufloff Drepth=-2■61/ 11-i I I I I I I I I I I I 00.07 --- II II II II 1I I 11 II II III I---;II ---II--- II --II �II -T-;I - LL 6.Qn 0.06 ------- _ ______1_c-__ __- A-__ 0.05 -_II1III ______Y _I___y___r___I___Y___I___y___r___I___y I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0.04 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0.03 ___•___1 _I___JLI1IJL---I___J___L___I___1___L__J___1___I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0.02 -------r -I---y---r---I----r---r--�---r---I---ti---r---1---r---r--1---r---1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0.01 ---I- I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 --- -I---j---r------j--- ---,--- ,---- -- ---,----,--- ---,----,--- ,---_,.. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0 PP 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 Time (hours) 8 Edgewood-Post 416-15 Type X 24-hr I -yr/WQV Rainfall=2.90" Prepared by Bibbo Associates, LLP Printed 4/16/2015 2:23:15 PM HydroCAD®8.50 s/n 002227 ©2007 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment P-2: POST 2 Runoff = 0.5 cfs® 12.19 hrs, Volume= 1,979 cf, Depth= 0.80" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method,UH=SCS,Time Span=0.00-960.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs Type III 24-hr 1 -yr/WQV Rainfall=2.90" Area(so CN Description 10,915 70 Woods,Good,HSG C 1,694 98 Paved parking&roofs 9,850 74 >75% Grass cover,Good,HSG C _ 7,350 71 Meadow,non-grazed,HSG C 29,809 73 Weighted Average 28,115 Pervious Area 1,694 Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.3 100 0.1130 0.16 Sheet Flow, Woods:Light underbrush n=0.400 P2=3.50" 0.2 13 0.0769 1.39 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Woodland Kv=5.0 fps 1.6 242 0.0293 2.57 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Grassed Waterway Kv= 15.0 fps 12.1 355 Total Subcatchment P-2: POST 2 Hydrograph 0.52 ------ ---i--- ---i------i-------- i---i-- ---i------i---i----------- 0.5 --i--- 0.5 ----- --+---r---I--- r------y---r---I--- ---r---I-------r---1---r---I -Runoff 0.5 cfs I I I 1 I I I I I I I I 0.48 ---;---i---,--- ---L---,---i---i---1-------,--- ---i---,---7---i---,---i -1 --�--- 0.46 --- -I----4--- -1---" -1----4---}---I---�---*---I---+--- '- I- T-o.aa --- -I--- 0.42 --- -I----,--- --1---4--- r --1I; - - _---�/-------1 __ _ I I I I I I I I I __I___Rai nf61.1= •.9r0'-'-� 0.a ---,- -,--- -------,---;---,----,---;---,---;- 0.38 ___I___1_ _I___J---4._-____1---I---J---L_______l___L___I___1___L__J___L___I_ 0.36 ------T- -;---;---;------;---;--;---T---;-R 'no drel'pIp�� 29 09Tsf-- 0.34 L_ _I___J___L___I___1---I-__J___L---1___Mfto. =L_��___1___I I I I I I I I I I I ]'�I I I I77o 1^ I 0.32 ------T- -I--- ---r------ ---I---'1---r-�unpff��,/ilU _��1_V1�/ _I �W 0.3 _-_I___1_ _I___J___L___I___1___I___J___1______ ___L___ _ w I .V.i I I I �Ij I }I 'I'//�� I I O.Z6 --_I___L_ _I___J___L---I___J---I___J---L___I___ u�.oJJ_�e�tla�.LJ-- • r�_I 0.26 U. -- ---- _ ------1---J---I--- --- ---1--- J--FfoW=Len. -_ 1 _ ,--- _ ; I I I I I I I I y_ 1 0.22 i_ '___y___i iI-__Ii___iI___i__ I i--_�fh -3§5!-,-- 0.22 ;�� _;- 0.2 ___I___+_ _,---y---r___,___y---,---I,-__r---1___ti___r___ _ _ to __}: 1 I I I I I I I I I I I �- /�• mto 0.18 - 1 - I---J---I----1---�I---I---'- ' 1--- ---L---I_ IAS / _ _I 0.16 ------+- -I--- ---1----1--- ---I----4---4----1----I---4----I---+4----I-f---1---+---1- 0.14 ---�---�- I I I I I __ 1___1 ___1 __ I___I ___I___ I --- I--C:w1��' 3-I I I I I 1 I I I ,y 0.12 ---'---+- -I---i--- ---I----{---1---11I---}I ---1---"1I---1----I---+----------+---1 0.1 --- I -- I_--I ___I _ ---I I 0.08 ---'---+ -1---4---1----I--- ---1--- ---4-----1----1---+----1---4---~---4---�---1 __ __ I 1 I I I I 1 I 1 I I I I I 0.06 -r - I---�---r---I---�---r--�---r---1---�---r---1---T---r--�---r---1 0.04 ___.___1 __ __J___L___I___1___I___J___LIJLJ1___L__J___1___I- I I I I I 1 1 I I I 1 I I 0.02 ---- T --r- ---r---I---� -r---1---r---r---1 1---r---1 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 Time (hours) 8 Edgewood-Post 416-15 711pe III 24-hr 1 -yr/WQV Rainfall=2.90" Prepared by Bibbo Associates, LLP Printed 4/16/2015 2:23:15 PM HydroCAD®8.50 s/n 002227 ®2007 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Reach DP: DESIGN POINT Inflow Area= 31,907 sf, 11.88% Impervious, Inflow Depth= 0.74" for 1-yr/WQV event Inflow = 0.5 cis® 12.19 hrs, Volume= 1,979 cf Outflow = 0.5 cfs® 12.19 hrs, Volume= 1,979 cf, Atten=0%, Lag=0.0 min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method,71me Span=0.00-960.00 hrs,dt=0.01 hrs Reach DP: DESIGN POINT Hydrograph 0.52 ------ ---1---i---i---I---i---i---i---i---I---i---I---i---i---i---i---i--- 1 0.5 ----- 0.5CfS --t---r-- ---r---I---t---r---I---r---I---+---r-- ---r---I---r :Inflow 0.48 -------------' 1 ---'---L---'---I- I I I I I I I I I I -Outflow I T---F I I I __-___I_______I__________________I___- 0.46 ------*---I---+---I'---I---*---I---+--- ---I---f"----'Ijw�--+---I----i---------------+ 0.44 ----- I I I I I I I ___I In' Ib'- - A.ea=3-1 90■ V#- -- --------- 0.42 ------+ ---1---+--- 0.4 ------L- -'----' ---'----1---L---'----' ---'----'---L---'---L---L--_j---L---1---L I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0.38 ------ 0.36 _____0.36 ------T I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0.34 ------L _I___1___L__J___L___I___1___L__J__-L___I___1___L__J___L--- 0.32 __0.32 ______r _1___T---r__,---r---I---T---r__,---r---I---T---I___,---r---I---T w 0.3 ______L _I___1___L______L___1___1___L__J___L___I___1___I___J___L___I___1 I 1 I I 1 I 1 I I I I I I I I I ... 0.28 ------r -I---r---r---I---r---1---r---r---i---r---1---r---r---1---r---1---r 3 0.26 ------L1---L---I___L___1___1---L__J---L---I---1___I___J___L---I___1 C I I I I I I 1, I I I I I I I I 1 0.24 ------r -1---Y---r---+---r---1---r--- ---�---r---1---t---r------r---1---r LL. 0.22 ------L -I---1---L---I---L---1---1---'---J---L---I---1---'---J---L---I---1 0.2 0.18 ------'- -1----'---1----'---L---1--- ---'----1---L---1--- 1----1---J---L---1--- 1- I 1 I I I 1 1 1 I I I 1 I 1 0.16 ------� -1---+---�--'1---�---1---+---�--�---�---1---+---1----1---�---1---+ 0.14 -------L I I I I I I I I I I I ----------------------------------------------------------- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0.12 ------* -1---+--- ---+--- F---1---+--- + ---1_-_1 -I--_ 1 ---1 --_I---I I I I I I I 0.1 I I I I I I ___I___________I_______1_____ ________I_ 0.08 ------�' -1---+---1'---1--- ---1---+--- --'I---1'---I---+---1---'1---1'---1---+ I I I I 1 I I I I I I 0.06 ------r - ,---T---r---,---r---I---T---r---,---r---1---T---r--�---r---,---T 0.04 __ L .__ __1___L__J___L___I___1-------- I I I I I I I I I I I I 0.02 - � --1- ---r--�---r---1---r---r--�---r---I---r---r--�---r---1---r 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 Time (hours) 8 Edgewood-Post 416-15 Type III 24-hr 1 -yr/WQV Rainfall=2.90" Prepared by Bibbo Associates, LLP Printed 4/16/2015 2:23:15 PM HydroCAD®8.50 s/n 002227 ®2007 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Pond INFEL: 150 Inffitrators Inflow Area= 2,098 sf,100.00%Impervious, Inflow Depth= 2.67" for 1-yr/WQV event Inflow = 0.1 cfs® 12.08 hrs, Volume= 467 cf Outflow = 0.0 cfs® 9.82 hrs, Volume= 467 cf, Atten=97%, Lag=0.0 min Discarded = 0.0 cfs® 9.82 hrs, Volume= 467 cf Primary = 0.0 cfs 0 0.00 hrs, Volume= 0 cf Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method,Time Span=0.00-960.00 hrs,dt=0.01 hrs Peak Elev=200.32'@ 15.93 hrs Surf.Area=338 sf Storage=268 cf Plug-Flow detention time=(not calculated:outflow precedes inflow) Center-of-Mass det.time=595.3 min( 1,353.8-758.5) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 199.00' 318 cf 15.00'W a 22.50%x 3.00'H Prismatoid 1,013 cf Overall-217 cf Embedded=795 cf x 40.0%Voids #2 199.50' 217 cf 29.81W x 19.0'H s 10.25%Cultec 150XLHD x 8 Inside#1 535 cf Total Available Storage Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Discarded 199.00' 0.500 in/hr EaSltrat ion over Surface area #2 Primary 201.50' 6.0" x 50.0'long Culvert CPP,square edge headwall, Ke=0.500 Outlet Invert= 199.50' S=0.0400'/' Cc=0.900 n=0.013 Corrugated PE,smooth interior Discarded OutFlow Max=0.0 cfs 0 9.82 hrs HW=199.03' (Free Discharge) 1=EaSltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.0 cfs) )primary OutFlow Max--0.0 cfs 0 0.00 hrs HW=199.00' 'IW=0.00' (Dynamic Tailwater) T 2 Culvert (Controls 0.0 cfs) Pond INFEL: 150 InfUtrators Hydrograph 0.15 -------------------- -- ---------- -- --�-------- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I _ __ 0.1 cfs I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I f Infj" 0.14 - --r--7---r-- ---r-- ---r---1---r---1---r---r---r---I---r---1 -Outflow I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I 0.13 ------ ' -'---'---1__-' -- ---I__- '__-' _i -' ___i _-' ___147998-§f-:' M_I _{_I -Discarded I I I I I I fnflorlV Area=��09$ § I -Primary 0.12 __�___L _-A___L__�___L--_-A___L__J___L__J___L _J___ I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I 0.111 I I I I r---i ---rI ----------- Peak-El11I evII =21I 0 V11. 2II '- 0 7 e 0.09 __�___� _ --- ------�__�---�__�---�__�___�__�___(_ � I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 I I I I I I ... 0.06 --�---r -�---r--�---r--�---r--�---r--�---r--�---r--�---r---I---r---I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I O0.07 --=---L j I I I j I I L j I I 1 LL I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I 0.06 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0.05 ------r --1---r--ti---r------r--y---r--y---r--ti---r------r---t---r---I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0.04 ------L -1---I---1---L--j---I---j---I---1---L---1--- ---I--- ---1---L---I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0.03 L _J---L__-J---L__J---L__-J---L__J---L__J___L__J___L------L___r I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0.02 ------r 7---r---1---r---1---r---r---r--�---r--�---r---1---r---I---r---I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0.0 cfs -I---I I I I I L---j I I 0.0 cfs I I ___I___�______�______�___I_______I___ I _ I I I I I I I I I 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 '45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 Time (hours) 8 Edgewood-Post 416-15 7IZpe X 24-hr 10-yr Rainfall=5.10" Prepared by Bibbo Associates, LLP Printed 4/16/2015 2:23:16 PM HydroCAD®8.50 s/n 002227 ®2007 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Time span=0.00-960.00 hrs,dt=0.01 hrs,96001 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method,UH=SCS Reach routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method Subcatchment P-1:POST 1 Runoff Area--2,098 sf 100.00%Impervious Runoff Depth=4.86" TC--6.0 min CN=98 Runoff=0.2 cis 850 cf Subcatchment P-2:POST 2 Runoff Area=29,809 sf 5.68%Impervious Runoff Depth=2.36" Flow Lengih=355' Tr-12.1 min CN=73 Runoff=1.5 cfs 5,860 cf Reach DP:DESIGN POINT Inflow--I.5 cfs 5,974 cf Outflow=1.5 cfs 5,974 cf Pond INFIL: ISO Infiltrators Peak Elev=201.57' Storage--478 cf Inflow--0.2 cfs 850 cf Discarded=0.0 cis 736 cf Primary--0.0 cfs 114 cf Outflow--0.0 cfs 850 cf Total Runoff Area=31,907 of Runoff Volume=6,710 cf Average Runoff Depth=2.52" 88.12%Pervious=28,115 of 11.88%Impervious=3,792 of 8 Edgewood-Post 416-15 7tjpe III 24-hr 10-yr Rainfall=5.10" Prepared by Bibbo Associates, LLP Printed 4/16/2015 2:23:16 PM HydroCAD®8.50 s/n 002227 ®2007 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment P-1: POST 1 Runoff = 0.2 cfs® 12.08 hrs, Volume= 850 cf, Depth= 4.86" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method,UH=SCS,Time Span=0.00-960.00 hrs,dt=0.01 hrs Type III 24-hr 10-yr Rainfall=5.10" Area(sfl CN Description • 2,098 98 House 2,098 Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment P-1: POST 1 Hydrograph 0.26 ------1---I---J--- '---1---1---1---J---i'---I----1---L---1---I------ �---�---' 0.25 ----- 0.2 cfs I I I I I 1 I I I IL I I RUrIOff 0.24 ------1 __I___J___L___I___1___L__J___L___I___J___L___I----- --- 0.23 -_1___0.23 ---:-__; �___; ;___; ;__= ===i===;T�i eLl -24 T.htrt a==syr-=; 0.22 ---- 0.21 ------r -I--- ---r---,---T---i-- -------i-- ---r---1- -T---i--�--- - 0.2 ------1 --I---J---1----1---1---1---J---4"---1---J---�''�^{/�� 0.19 ------I- -I---2- I I I I I I I I ■ ■MI Mafl=5-1- ---I I I I --r---I---T---j---I---r---j-- ---r---1---T---�------T---I 0.18 ______1_1--_1___L___I___1__-I___JL_ J__ I___1 _1_ _I 0.17 --- T ----;--- ---,---;---T- #u=r�ofi = Kea=�,0 of 0.16 ___.___1_ _I___J___L___I___1___L__J---L---I___J___L---I___1___L__J___1___I ---rRor -" VoIun -8S0 �fT0.15 ------T 0.14 ------ J--- ---1--- I---1---J---� ---- -- --- - ~ - = - '- I -------- ---; -- - ---i---= 0.13 ------rI -I---�I---I ---r--�I--- Ir 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 - -1 r0.12 ------; -;---I---;---;---;---;---;___. R-Un6f �ep#h�4�86-i 0.11 ------r -I-- T-- r-- I-- T- r--�---r-- - 11-- r-- - T- 0.1 I ______1 _I___1___L_ _TF Iy■�■I�■ I 0.09 I I I I I I I I 1 I I I ■b_ .0� ■..i n-1 ------r -I--- ---r---1---T---r-- ---r---1--- 1---r---I---T--- -- ---T---1 0.08 ______1 _I___J___L___I___1___I___J___L___IJ___L___I___1___ I I_ I II I I I I 0.07 ______T ...............___TI___I___,___r___I___,I___I r___I___T___ . 8_I 0.06 ----- 1 _1___1___L___I___1___I___J___L___I___J___L___I___1___L__J___1___I I I I I I 0.05 ------ r--II---rI --- I 0.04 ------1 _I___ I___L___I___1___L__J___L___1___J___L___I___1___L__J--- 0.03 __0.03 I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I 0.02 ------ _I___J---L---1___1___I___J___L---1___J___L___I___1___L__J___1___I I I I I I I I I I I I 0.01 ----- -- --'1---r---I---T---1----1---r---1---1---r---I---T---r---I---r---I 0 1 1 1 1 1 M__­.M ..­!....i.... ..-H....i....H.1+1110111' j 0 6 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 Time (hours) 8 Edgewood-Post 416-15 7tjpe III 24-hr 10-yr Rainfall=5.10" Prepared by Bibbo Associates, LLP Printed 4/16/2015 2:23:17 PM HydroCAD®8.50 s/n 002227 ®2007 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment P-2: POST 2 Runoff = 1.5 cis® 12.17 hrs, Volume= 5,860 cf, Depth= 2.36" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method,UH=SCS,Time Span=0.00-960.00 hrs,dt=0.01 hrs Type III 24-hr 10-yr Rainfall=5.10" Area(sf CN Description 10,915 70 Woods,Good,HSG C 1,694 98 Paved parldng&roofs 9,850 74 >75% Grass cover,Good,HSG C 7,350 71 Meadow,non-grazed,HSG C 29,809 73 Weighted Average 28,115 Pervious Area 1,694 Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.3 100 0.1130 0.16 Sheet Flow, Woods:Light underbrush n=0.400 P2=3.50" 0.2 13 0.0769 1.39 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Woodland Kv—5.0 fps 1.6 242 0.0293 2.57 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Grassed Waterway Kv= 15.0 fps 12.1 355 Total Subcatchment P-2: POST 2 Hydrograph I I I I I I I I I 1.5 cfs I I I I I I I I I w Runoff I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 Type III 24-hr 10 - ;yr I I I I I I I I I I Rai fall=� 1� I I I I I I I I I I � � • I I I I I I I I I I I ! I Runoff Areal=29,809 sf R0noff A/o1.ur0e=5;8;60 rcf O Runoff Depth=2.36"I I I 1 I I I I I I I I LL I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I Flow' Length- %' I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II I I I � I I I I I I I I I I I I T0=12.1 min I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I V CSV—/�y 3 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 I I I 1 1 ❑ ❑ 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 60 85 40 95 Time (hours) 8 Edgewood-Post 416-15 ?type III 24-hr 10-yr Rainfall=5.10" Prepared by Bibbo Associates, LLP Printed 4/16/2015 2:23:17 PM HydroCAD®8.50 s/n 002227 ®2007 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Reach DP: DESIGN POINT Inflow Area= 31,907 sf, 11.88%Impervious, Inflow Depth= 2.25" for 10-yr event Inflow = 1.5 cfs 0 12.17 hrs, Volume= 5,974 cf Outflow = 1.5 cfs® 12.17 hrs, Volume= 5,974 cf, Atten=0%, Lag=0.0 min Routing by Dyn-Star-Ind method,Time Span=0.00-960.00 hrs,dt=0.01 hrs Reach DP: DESIGN POINT Hydrograph 1.5 Cis I 1 _Inflow I I I I I I I I I I I I Outflow I I I 1 I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I :Inflow Area ',31:9907 I31' 907 5f 'I I I I I 1 I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I • 1 I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I II I I I 1 I I I I � T_ ___T___r___1___T___r__,___T___I___�___I w 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I U. v I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I • I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 Time (hours) 8 Edgewood-Post 416-15 Ytjpe III 24-hr 10-yr Rainfall=5.10" Prepared by Bibbo Associates, LLP Printed 4/16/2015 2:23:17 PM HydroCAD9 8.50 s/n 002227 ©2007 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Pond INFEL: 150 Infiltrators Inflow Area= 2,098 sf,100.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth= 4.86" for 10-yr event Inflow = 0.2 cfs® 12.08 hrs, Volume= 850 cf Outflow = 0.0 cfs® 12.98 hrs, Volume= 850 cf, Atten=91%, Lag=54.0 min Discarded = 0.0 cis® 7.84 hrs, Volume= 736 cf Primary = 0.0 cis® 12.98 hrs, Volume= 114 cf Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method,Time Span=0.00-960.00 hrs,dt=0.01 hrs Peak Elev=201.57'0 12.98 hrs Surf.Area=338 sf Storage=478 cf Plug-Flow detention time=(not calculated:outflow precedes inflow) Center-of-Mass det.time=915.1 min( 1,662.8-747.7) Volume Invert Avafl.Storage Storage Description #1 199.00' 318 cf 15.00'W x 22.50%x 3.00'H Prismatoid 1,013 cf Overall-217 cf Embedded=795 cf x 40.0%Voids #2 199.50' 217 cf 29.8'W x 19.01H x 10.25%Cultec 150XLHD x 8 Inside#1 535 cf Total Available Storage Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Discarded 199.00' 0.500 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area #2 Primary 201.50' 6.0" x 50.0'long Culvert CPP,square edge headwall, Ke=0.500 Outlet Invert= 199.50' S=0.0400'/' Cc=0.900 n=0.013 Corrugated PE,smooth interior Discarded OutFlow Max=0.0 cis®7.84 hrs HW=199.03' (Free Discharge) 1=Exfiltration (Exftltration Controls 0.0 cis) Primary OutFlow Max--0.0 cis® 12.98 hrs HW=201.57' TW=0.00' (Dynamic Tailwater) t2=Culvert (Inlet Controls 0.0 cis®0.92 fps) Pond INFIL: 150 Infiltrators Hydrograph 0.2 ------L--44---�'--J---L--J--- I I 1 I ~ J---r - JI---1-- -11--- 0.2 -- 0.2cfs __ nfow I - 0.24 __J---L _J---L__J---L__J---L__J---L__J---L_-J___L__J___L__J___L___I Outflow 0.23 -- I aVI -Discarded 0.2 L__J___L_ J_ L _Jo - M 1= ;098s - Primary 0.21 --- I 0. 0.19 ------r __1___r___1___r __--__�__1_____ 1 I I 1 , I 1 0.1 __J___L _J___L__J___L__J___L__J___L__J___LJLJL JLI 0.17 --;---� -;--- --;--- --;--- --;--- --;---�Storra e=478-c#- 0.1 __J___L _J___L__J___L__J___L__J___L__J___L__J___L_ L__J 1 I I I I I I I I I I I 0.1 ------L -J---L--J---L--J---L--J---I----I---L--J---L---I---1----I---L---I I Ir I 1 I I Ir I 11 I 11 I I I 0 0.1 --�---r -�--- --�---r--�---r--�---r--�---r--�---r---1---r---1---r---I a O.1 __J___L _J___L__J___L__J___L__J___L__J___L__J___L__J___L___I___L___I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I 0.11 --1---r -1---r------r--�---r--�---r--�---r--�---r------r---1---r---1 0.1 __ ___L _J___L__J__-L__J___I-__J___L-_J___L__J___L-_J___L___I_ I I I I 1 I I I I I I 1 I --I I 0.0 -- ---L _J___L__J___L__J___L__J-__L__J___L__J___L-_J___L___I___L___I I I 'r I 1 I I I 1 I I I I I I 0.07 --�---r -�---r--�---r--�---r--�---r--�---r--�---r---I---r---I---r---I 0.0 __J___L _J___L__J___L__J___L__J___L__J_-_L__J___L__J___L_ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0.0 --1---r -1---r---1---r---1---r-- ---r--1---r---I---r--1---r---1---r---I 0.04 ------L J___L__J___L__J___L__J___L__J___L__J___L-_J___L___I___L___I ' -I 1 I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I 0.0 - Q.Ocfs - r--1---r--�---r--�---r--1---r--1---r---,---r---,---r---1 0.02 -- ---L__J___L__J___L__J___L__J___L__J___L__J___L___I___L---I 0.0 cfs I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0.01 -- --r--1---r--1-- -7---r--1---r--1---r--1---r---I---r---I 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 60 65 90 95 Time (hours) 8 Edgewood-Post 416-15 7)lpe III 24-hr 25-yr Rainfall=6.40" Prepared by Bibbo Associates, LLP Printed 4/16/2015 2:23:18 PM HHydroCADD 8.50 s/n 002227 m 2007 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Time span=0.00-960.00 hrs,dt=0.01 hrs, 96001 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method,UH=SCS Reach routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method Subcatchment P-1:POST 1 Runoff Area=2,098 sf 100.00%Impervious Runoff Depth=6.16" Tc=6.0 min CN=98 Runoff=0.3 cfs 1,077 cf Subcatchment P-2:POST 2 RunoffArea=29,809 sf 5.68%Impervious Runoff Depth=3.42" Flow Length=355' Tc--12.1 min CN=73 Runoff=2.3 cis 8,504 cf Reach DP:DESIGN POINT Inflow--2.3 cfs 8,819 cf Outflow--2.3 cis 8,819 cf Pond INFEL: 150 Infiltrators Peak Elev--201.70' Storage--495 cf Inflow--0.3 cis 1,077 cf Discarded=0.0 cis 762 cf Primary--O.1 cfs 315 cf Outflow=0.1 cis 1,077 cf Total Runoff Area=31,907 sf Runoff Volume=9,581 cf Average Runoff Depth=3.60" 88.12%Pervious=28,115 sf 11.88%Impervious=3,792 sf 8 Edgewood-Post 416-15 7Ijpe X 24-hr 25-yr Rainfall=6.40" Prepared by Bibbo Associates, LLP Printed 4/16/2015 2:23:18 PM HydroCADS 8.50 s/n 002227 ©2007 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment P-1: POST 1 Runoff = 0.3 cfs® 12.08 hrs, Volume= 1,077 cf, Depth= 6.16" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method,UH=SCS,Time Span=0.00-960.00 hrs,dt=0.01 hrs Type III 24-hr 25-yr Rainfall=6.40" Area(sfl CN Description • 2,098 98 House 2,098 Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment P-1: POST 1 Hydrograph I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0.32 ----- 0.3 cfs --y---r---1--- ---1-------r---I---y---r---1---t---r-- ---+---1. —Runoff I I I I I I I I I I I I 0.3 ___ _1___I___ ___L___I___1___I___J___1___I___J___L___I___1___L__J___L___I � I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0.28 ------T---;---;---�---;---?---;--- 1---r---;--TypeAil-24-hr-25=yr-- 0.26 ------;---;---;--- ------ ---;---;---;---;---;---;--Rainfall- .-4 ��- 0.24 ' -I--- I---I ---I___ I- I I I I I I -'-I--- - I I --�---1--- ----------------- ---�---I--- ---1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 noff Area=2098 of-� 0.22 ------r -I----+---r---I----r---1---�---r---:-Ru I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I O.2 ______L_ _I___J___L___I___1___LR noff ollur e-1 ,0177 -f I I I I I I I I I I I I .,., I v0.16 ___I___T _1___,___r___I___T___I__,___T___1___RR,___T.___I___T___r__,___T___I I I I I I I -�-l�urioff-Depth=6.16." I I I I I I I I I I I I I V. 0.14 ------' -1 ---'---1---I---I---'---'---'---'- '---1-- -I I• I I I I--- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I T I 0.12 --- r---I---T---r--I---r ---I I I I I 1 I I I I I 1 I �N=98 j O.1 _______1 _1___� 1 ___L___I___ ___I___J___L___I___J___L___I_-_1___L I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 I _- 1 --- I 1 I i I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0.0 ------+ ----j--- ---1---+---'I--I---+--- ---+---I--- ---+---1 I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0.04 -------' -I----1---1----'----I---1----1--- I----1----1---1--------'' ---1----''--- 1-----1 I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0.0 ______ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 11111111111-111 0 5 16 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 Time (hours) 8 Edgewood-Post 416-15 Type III 24-hr 25-yr Rainfall=6.40" Prepared by Bibbo Associates, LLP Printed 4/16/2015 2:23:18 PM HydroCADS 8.50 s/n 002227 ©2007 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment P-2: POST 2 Runoff = 2.3 cis® 12.17 hrs, Volume= 8,504 cf, Depth= 3.42" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method,UH=SCS,71me Span=0.00-960.00 hrs,dt=0.01 hrs Type III 24-hr 25-yr Rainfall=6.40" Area(so CN Description 10,915 70 Woods,Good,HSG C 1,694 98 Paved parldng&roofs 9,850 74 >75% Grass cover,Good,HSG C 7,350 71 Meadow,non-grazed,HSG C 29,809 73 Weighted Average 28,115 Pervious Area 1,694 Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 10.3 100 0.1130 0.16 Sheet Flow, Woods:Light underbrush n=0.400 P2=3.50" 0.2 13 0.0769 1.39 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Woodland Kv=5.0 fps 1.6 242 0.0293 2.57 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Grassed Waterway Kv= 15.0 fps 12.1 355 Total Subcatchment P-2: POST 2 Hydrograph 2.3 cfs I —RUnoff I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I 2 ----;- - -- --- ------;--- ---+--TYPe III 24-hr 25 - yrs Ra1pfa11-6.40" I I I I I I I I I I I I I - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Runoff Area=29,809 sf I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 I ROnOff Volume-;8,5;04;cf I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i 1 I I I I I I R unofDepth=342"O I I I I ILL I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I ' I 1 -L--J___i---i--_i-_-i---i__J---i---i_F1ovy-L0' ngthT355'J I I I I I I I I I 1 1 � T I I II I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I Tt.=12.1 min ' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I /� � I I I I I I I I I I I ( _N=I/ 1 I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I V 13 : I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 Time (hours) 8 Edgewood-Post 416-15 711pe III 24-hr 25-yr Rainfall=6.40" Prepared by Bibbo Associates, LLP Printed 4/16/2015 2:23:18 PM HydroCAD®8.50 s/n 002227 m 2007 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Reach DP: DESIGN POINT Inflow Area= 31,907 sf, 11.88% Impervious, Inflow Depth= 3.32" for 25-yr event Inflow = 2.3 cfs 0 12.17 hrs, Volume= 8,819 Cf Outflow = 2.3 cfs® 12.17 hrs, Volume= 8,819 cf, Atten=0%, Lag=0.0 min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method,Time Span=0.00-960.00 hrs,dt=0.01 hrs Reach DP: DESIGN POINT Hydrograph 2.3 cfs I =Inflow I I I I I I I I I I I I I Outflow I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Inflow Aria=31: 907 sf I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I v I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I O 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I LL I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I L__ • I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 Time (hours) 8 Edgewood-Post 416-15 Type III 24-hr 25-yr Rainfall=6.40" Prepared by Bibbo Associates, LLP Printed 4/16/2015 2:23:18 PM HydroCADD 8.50 s/n 002227 ©2007 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Pond INFEL: 150 Infiltrators Inflow Area= 2,098 sf,100.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth= 6.16" for 25-yr event Inflow = 0.3 cfs® 12.08 hrs, Volume= 1,077 cf Outflow = 0.1 cfs® 12.30 hrs, Volume= 1,077 cf, Atten=61°x6, Lag= 13.0 min Discarded = 0.0 cfs® 6.87 hrs, Volume= 762 cf Primary = 0.1 cfs® 12.30 hrs, Volume= 315 cf Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method,Time Span=0.00-960.00 hrs,dt=0.01 hrs Peak Elev=201.70'® 12.30 hrs Surf.Area=338 sf Storage=495 cf Plug-Flow detention time=(not calculated:outflow precedes inflow) Center-of-Mass det.time=756.1 min( 1,500.3-744.2) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 199.00' 318 cf 15.001W x 22.501L x 3.00'H Prismatold 1,013 cf Overall-217 cf Embedded=795 cf x 40.0%Voids #2 199.50' 217 cf 29.81W x 19.0"H x 10.25%Cultec 150%1.HD x 8 Inside#1 535 cf Total Available Storage Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Discarded 199.00' 0.500 in/hr E filtration over Surface area #2 Primary 201.50' 6.0" x 50.0'long Culvert CPP,square edge headwall, Ke=0.500 Outlet Invert= 199.50' S=0.0400'/' Cc=0.900 n=0.013 Corrugated PE,smooth interior piscarded OutFlow Max=0.0 cfs®6.87 hrs HW=199.03' (Free Discharge) 1=Exfi1tradon (Exf ltration Controls 0.0 cfs) Drintary OutFlow Max=0.1 cfs® 12.30 hrs HW=201.70' 'IW=0.00' (Dynamic Tailwater) 2=Culvert (Inlet Controls 0.1 cfs @ 1.54 fps) Pond INFEU 150 Infiltrators Hydrograph I I I 1 I I I I I I 0.3 ----- 0.3 cfs --r--ti---r--ti---r---+---r---1---r---1---r--�---r---1---r---1 _InfIOW I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Outflow 0.3 __J___L _J___L__J___ __J___L__J___L__J___L__J___L___1___L___I___L___I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I ^Discarded 0.2 -------- ------------------- --------� InflowAr0a=2x098-af- -Primary 0.2 ------ I---4--- � ' -I- a -1-----I----4----4---4- - :Peak-EIY1=201.70-'----I� 1 I I I 1 I I 1 I I I I1r I I 1 1 I 0.22 --r---r - ---r-- ---r-- ---r-- ---r------r-S or x-4-95 a f--1 I I I I I I I I I I I � I 0.2 __-___L _J---L__J---L__J___L__J___L__J___L__J___L_ ___L___I___L___I w- I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0.18 --�---r --1---r--�---r--,---r--�---r--�---r---1---r---I---r---,---r---1 0 0.16 ---+---� -�---�---+---�--�---1---�---�--�---�--�---�---+---�---1---+----I LL 1 1 I 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 0.14 1 1 I 1 1 I I I I I __1 ___1_ 1 1 --1 ---1 ---------- 0.1 cfs I I I 11 I I 11 I I I I I I 0.12 --r---r --1---r-- ---r--11---r--7---r--11---r--11---r-- 1---r---1---r---1 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I 0.1 __J___L _J___L__J___L__J___L__J___L__J___L__J___L___1___L__J___L___1, I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0.08 ------I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0.06 --=---1- "�--- ---+--- --'1---1----+---1----4---I---4------ ---+----1---4----1 I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 I I 0.04 1- '---1----1-------1---'-----'- L--j---L--j---L__j---L---I L---1 I I I I I 1 I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 I I I I 0.02 - O.OcfS ---�---r---t---r- -7---r---t---r---i---r -1---r---1---r---1 I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I 0 0 5 10 15 20 z5 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 Time (hours) 8 Edgewood- Post 416-15 Tljpe III 24-hr 100-yr Rainfall=9.00" Prepared by Bibbo Associates, LLP Printed 4/16/2015 2:23:19 PM HydroCADS 8.50 s/n 002227 ©2007 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Time span=0.00-960.00 hrs,dt=0.01 hrs,96001 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method,UH=SCS Reach routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method Subcatchment P-1:POST 1 Runoff Area---2,098 sf 100.00%Impervious Runoff Depth=8.76" Tc--6.0 min CN=98 Runoff-0.4 cfs 1,531 cf Subcatchment P-2:POST 2 Runoff Area=29,809 sf 5.68%Impervious Runoff Depth=5.71" Flow Length--355' Tc--12.1 min CN=73 Runoff=3.7 cfs 14,173 cf Reach DP:DESIGN POINT Inflow-4.1 cfs 14,918 cf Outflow-4.1 cfs 14,918 of Pond INFIL: 180 Infiltrators Peak Elev=201.93' Storage--525 cf Inflow--0.4 cfs 1,531 cf Discarded=0.0 cfs 786 cf Primary--0.4 cfs 745 cf Outflow=0.4 cfs 1,532 cf Total Runoff Area=31,907 of Runoff Volume= 15,708 cf Average Runoff Depth=5.91" 88.12%Pervious=28,115 of 11.88%Impervious=3,792 of 8 Edgewood-Post 416-15 Type III 24-hr 100-yr Rainfall=9.00" Prepared by Bibbo Associates, LLP Printed 4/16/2015 2:23:19 PM HydroCAD®8.50 s/n 002227 0 2007 HvdroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment P-1: POST 1 Runoff = 0.4 cis® 12.08 hrs, Volume= 1,531 cf, Depth= 8.76" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method,UH=SCS,Time Span=0.00-960.00 hrs,dt=0.01 hrs Type III 24-hr 100-yr Rainfall=9.00" Area(sfl CN Description " 2,098 98 House 2,098 Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description _ (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 6.0 Direct Entry, Subcatchment P-1: POST 1 Hydrograph 0.4 ------- ___I. -_1---L------1---L__J___1___I___J---L___I___1___L__J___1___I ____ 0.4 cfs 1 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 I �Runoff 0.42 -------I --I--- ---I---I---I---I----I--- ---'--- ---I---I---I---I----I---1---' • I r I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 -:24 0.34 ------+ --r--- ---r---1--- ---i---ti---+----T�!pe��l=lith-��100-'fir- 0.36 1 I I I I I I I I Rainfall-6.-0p 1 0.34 ------i-7- ---1- -- --- ---I--- --- ---1------------------I I I I I I I I I I I I 0.32 ------+ -1---4---;---;---;---;---;---I--- Runoff Area=2;098 sf- 0.3 ------T -1---4---r---I---T---1---1---r---I---1---r---1---T---r --I---r---I 0.28 ------ -------- -I--- ----- InfduTcI 0.26 ------; DRaVn , 31f v I O0.24 ---•---TI--- 0.22 ------- -r------ -T------ ,II--- U. rII I � lI 0.2 ______1 ___1___L_____ 1___L__J___1_____ J__ II-OI_a�II fII l��I IL�XII -11-I1I L___I__ _L___I I I I I I I I /� 0.18 ______t _I___1___r___1___y___r__y___*___1___y___r___1__�St.r ■ -��-I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0.1 _-____T _I___7___r___I___ ___r__,___T___ __ I___r___I___T--- r 0.14 ------�' -1---1---L'---1--- ---'----I---L---1---j---I---'-------I-�/ 1�9A,/J I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I 0.1 ______+ _I___4___I-___I___+___I___ 4___ ___1___ ___y.___I___+___ __ ___+ _1 1 I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 0.1 ______T -,---4___r___I___T___I_-_,___T__---__,___r___I___T___1 r__,___T 0.08 -------' -I----1-------I---I---I-------I----I---i---I----1----1 ---I----I--- I----1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I 0.0 ------'L -1---+---1"---I---+---I----4---+---I---4---�'---I---+---1--- ---�"---1 I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I 0.04 ------T -I---7---r---1---'f---r--1---r---I---1---r---I---T---r--1---r---I 0.0 - I--- ---I---I---I---I----I---I------ --- ---I---I-------I---I---I 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 Time (hours) 8 Edgewood-Post 416-15 711pe III24-hr 100-yr Rainfall=9.00" Prepared by Bibbo Associates, LLP Printed 4/16/2015 2:23:19 PM HydroCAD®8.50 s/n 002227 0 2007 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Subcatchment P-2: POST 2 Runoff = 3.7 cis 0 12.17 hrs, Volume= 14,173 cf, Depth= 5.71" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method,iJH=SCS,Time Span=0.00-960.00 hrs,dt=0.01 hrs Type III 24-hr 100-yr Rainfall=9.00" Area(so CN Description 10,915 70 Woods,Good,HSG C 1,694 98 Paved parking&roofs 9,850 74 >75% Grass cover,Good,HSG C 7,350 71 Meadow,non-grazed,HSG C 29,809 73 Weighted Average 28,115 Pervious Area 1,694 Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (CES) 10.3 100 0.1130 0.16 Sheet Flow, Woods:Light underbrush n=0.400 P2=3.50" 0.2 13 0.0769 1.39 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Woodland Kv—5.0 fps 1.6 242 0.0293 2.57 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Grassed Waterway Kv= 15.0 fps 12.1 355 Total Subcatchment P-2: POST 2 Hydrograph 4 --- I1 - --I--- ---I--- 3.7 Cis � _I _I 1 1 I I 1 1 I I -Runoff I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I 1 I 1 I I I I 1 I I I TI III 1 24 I-hr I10I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ype 0 -syr I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Rainfall . 00" 3 ______1_ _L__J___1___L___I___1---L__J___1___L- .I___1___L__J___1___L__J Ronoff Are0=29,$09;sf I I I I I I I I I I I Runoff Volume=14,173;cf I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I1 II II II II 1II III III III III III Ru.no Depth--' 5.71 2 ---+---F- ---+--- I----r--- -+---+--- u -+c I ILL Flo* nbth 3�5I I I 1 I I I I I I I I Tc=12.1 min I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I V/�I NI I I I 1 I I 1 I I I I ■ �' =73 I 1 I I I I 1 I I I I I _I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 ­6075 70 75 80 85 90 95 Time (hours) 8 Edgewood-Post 416-15 711pe III 24-hr 100-yr Rainfall=9.00" Prepared by Bibbo Associates, LLP Printed 4/16/2015 2:23:19 PM HydroCAD®8.50 s/n 002227 ®2007 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Reach DP: DESIGN POINT Inflow Area= 31,907 sf, 11.88% Impervious, Inflow Depth= 5.61" for 100-yr event Inflow = 4.1 cis® 12.16 hrs, Volume= 14,918 cf Outflow = 4.1 cis® 12.16 hrs, Volume= 14,918 cf, Atten=0%, Lag=0.0 min Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method,Time Span=0.00-960.00 hrs,dt=0.01 hrs Reach DP: DESIGN POINT Hydrograph I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 4.1 CfS —Inflow I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I Outflow 4 ----r4---Ir---I---TI---Ir---I---TI ---r---I---r1 ---r - rI '31' 'Inflow Area� I 907 sf ' I I I I I I I I I 1 I I' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 3 ______ II I I I I I I I I I T_ 'i___I__ T___r__i___r___I___T___r___i___T___i ,___T___i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I v I I I I 1 I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I O I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I E 2 ___ _ .I____I___ ___1___i_ I i--- 7___F___1___T___I__ ___I___i_-_i I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I • I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 ------1 L--J---1------1---L------1---L------1---I---J---I---I---1--- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0 0'' 'T' 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 Time (hours) 8 Edgewood-Post 416-15 ?type III 24-hr 100-yr Rainfall=9.00" Prepared by Bibbo Associates, LLP Printed 4/16/2015 2:23:19 PM HydroCADS 8.50 s/n 002227 0 2007 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Summary for Pond INFEL: 150 Infiltrators Inflow Area= 2,098 sf,100.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth= 8.76" for 100-yr event Inflow = 0.4 cfs 0 12.08 bra, Volume= 1,531 cf Outflow = 0.4 cfs® 12.11 hrs, Volume= 1,532 cf, Atten=6%, Lag= 1.8 min Discarded = 0.0 cfs® 4.59 bra, Volume= 786 cf Primary = 0.4 cfs® 12.11 hrs, Volume= 745 cf Routing by Dyn-Star-Ind method,Time Span=0.00-960.00 hrs,dt=0.01 hrs Peak Elev-201.93'0 12.11 hrs Surf.Area=338 sf Storage=525 cf Plug-Flow detention time=(not calculated:outflow precedes inflow) Center-of-Mass det.time=558.7 min( 1,298.5-739.8) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 199.00' 318 cf 15.00'W s 22.50%s 3.00111 Prismatoid 1,013 cf Overall-217 cf Embedded=795 cf x 40.0%Voids #2 199.50' 217 cf 29.81w s 19.0"H a 10.25%Cultec 150XLEM x 8 Inside#1 535 cf Total Available Storage Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Discarded 199.00' 0.500 in/hr Exf3ltrattion over Surface area #2 Primary 201.50' 6.0" a 50.0'long Culvert CPP,square edge headwall, Ke=0.500 Outlet Invert= 199.50' S=0.0400'/' Cc=0.900 n=0.013 Corrugated PE,smooth interior Discarded OutFlow Max_-0.0 cfs @ 4.59 hrs HW=199.03' (Free Discharge) 1=Exf91tration (Exfiltration Controls 0.0 cfs) Drimary OutFlow Max--0.4 cfs® 12.11 bra HW=201.92' TW=0.00' (Dynamic Tailwater) 2=Culvert (Inlet Controls 0.4 cfs®2.22 fps) Pond INFIL: 150 Infiltrators Hydrograph 0.4 ------L__J___L__J---L__J---L__J---L__J___L__J---L__J---L__J---L___' __;__ 0.4 cfs I �- 0. --r---I---r--�---r--7---r--�--- Inflow r--�---r--�---r---I---r---I -OUtfIOW 0.42 ----- --' ---I---I -- '---' -- '---' -- ---' -- '---' --_I---' ---'---' ---' 0.4 cfS _i i _ i i i -Discarded O. __J___I _ I___I __J___L__ I___I __ I--- Ilnflo�vvJ,Ar�a�ZO9v-Sf 1 -Primary 0.3 __-___r _i___r__y___r__y___r__i___r__y___r__y___r__�___ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0.34 -------'- -----'----'---L--J---L--J---'- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0.32 --- ---� - --- -- ---�-- --- --�--- -- --- --�--- ---1--- -- ---}---I 0.3 ------r - ---r-- ---r--r---r-- ---r-- ---r- {D�race� i�i�-Y -I 0.28 I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0.26 -i--- I---4--- -1--- ---4--- ---1 v 024 I I I I I----------------------------- 0.22 I10.2L ' I I I I I 1 I I I I I 0.2 __J---L _J---L__J___L__J___L__J___L__J___L__J___L__J___L---I---L___I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I 0.18 __y___r. _y___r__y___r__y___r__y___r__y___r__y___t__y___t___I___Y___I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0.1 ------r -- ---r--�---r--�---r--�---r--�---r---I---r---I---r---I---r---,I 0.14 --L -----L--_---L-_J---L--J---L---'---L_--'---L------L---I---L---' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0.12 -- ---1- `I--- --�I---1---�I---~--4'I--- -1---I---1---�---I I I I I I I I I I I I 0.08 --J---L _---L--_---L--J---L--J---L--J---L---'---L---I---L------L---' 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0.0 ------� - -- -- --- -- ---�-- --- --�--- -- 1--- -- ---�-- --- ---I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0.04 -----r �---r--�---r--�---r------r------r------r---I---r---I---r---I 0.02 0.0 cfs ___!___I. _L__!___L I 1 I 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 Time (hours) BIBBO ASSOCIATES, LLP Consulting Engineers - Planners 4/172015 Soil Map t Engineer's Report 8 Edgeicood,LLC 3 Hydrologic Soil Group—Westchester County,New York (8 Edgewood Drive Soil Group) 611730 611240 611750 611260 611270 611280 611290 611900 611310 611920 611330 6U340 41°1'3TN 1�- -a-1 41°1'37N fel Fr a 1 S• t a � a 0 a a � a a , ga a � a � a i a y . a Q r �� • a 41°1'27'N NV Rim 41°1'2TN 61UM 6U240 611250 611260 611270 611280 611290 611300 611310 61L320 611330 611340 3 3 Map Scale:1:763 fi prinked an A portrait(85"x 11")sheet Meters N 0 10 20 40 60 Feet 0 35 70 140 210 Map projedon:web Mercator Comer 000rdhmt es:WGSB4 Edge tics:UTM Zone 18N W2384 Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 6/30/2014 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 4 Hydrologic Soil Group—Westchester County,New York (8 Edgewood Drive Soil Group) MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION Area of Interest(Aot) p C The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:12,000. C Area of Interest(AOI) 13 C/D Warning:Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Soils El Soil Rating Polygons D Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause F__J A p Not rated or not available misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line Water Features placement.The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting A/D soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. Streams and Canals I------ B Transportation Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map 0 B/D i44 Rails measurements. C Interstate Highways Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: http:/Aaebsoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov C/D US Routes Coordinate System: Web Mercator(EPSG:3857) 0 D Major Roads Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator 0 Not rated or not available Local Roads projection,which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area.A projection that preserves area,such as the Soil Rating Lines Background Albers equal-area conic projection,should be used if more accurate " A Aerial Photography calculations of distance or area are required. d ' A/D This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of �. B the version date(s)listed below. B/D Soil Survey Area: Westchester County,New York Survey Area Data: Version 9,Dec 15,2013 r C Soil map units are labeled(as space allows)for map scales 1:50,000 r ► C/D or larger. x ' D Date(s)aerial images were photographed: Mar 26,2011—Apr 16, 0 r Not rated or not available 2012 Sol[Rating Points The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were 0 A compiled and digitized probably differs from the background Imagery displayed on these maps.As a result,some minor shifting p A/D of map unit boundaries may be evident. L7 B o B/D usDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 6/30/2014 � Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 4 Hydrologic Soil Group—Westchester County,New York 8 Edgewood Drive Soil Group Hydrologic Soil Group Hydrologic Sol]Group—Summary by Map Unit—Westchester County,New York(NY118) Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Acres In AOI Percent of AOI PnC Paxton fine sandy loam, C 0.1 4.4% 8 to 15 percent slopes WdA Woodbridge loam,0 to 3 j C 1.1 95.6% percent slopes Totals for Area of Interest 1.1 100.0% Description Hydrologic soil groups are based on estimates of runoff potential. Soils are assigned to one of four groups according to the rate of water infiltration when the soils are not protected by vegetation,are thoroughly wet,and receive precipitation from long-duration storms. The soils in the United States are assigned to four groups(A, B, C, and D)and three dual classes(A/D, B/D, and C/D).The groups are defined as follows: Group A. Soils having a high infiltration rate(low runoff potential)when thoroughly wet.These consist mainly of deep,well drained to excessively drained sands or gravelly sands.These soils have a high rate of water transmission. Group B. Soils having a moderate infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of moderately deep or deep,moderately well drained or well drained soils that have moderately fine texture to moderately coarse texture.These soils have a moderate rate of water transmission. Group C. Soils having a slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wet.These consist chiefly of soils having a layer that impedes the downward movement of water or soils of moderately fine texture or fine texture.These soils have a slow rate of water transmission. Group D. Soils having a very slow infiltration rate(high runoff potential)when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of clays that have a high shrink-swell potential, soils that have a high water table, soils that have a claypan or clay layer at or near the surface, and soils that are shallow over nearly impervious material. These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission. If a soil is assigned to a dual hydrologic group(A/D, B/D, or C/D),the first letter is for drained areas and the second is for undrained areas. Only the soils that in their natural condition are in group D are assigned to dual classes. Rating Options Aggregation Method. Dominant Condition UusDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 6/30/2014 i� Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 4 Hydrologic Soil Group—Westchester County,New York 8 Edgewood Drive Soil Group Component Percent Cutoff. None Specified Tie-break Rule: Higher usDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 6/30/2014 i Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 4 of 4 BIBBO ASSOCIATES, LLP Consulting Engineers - Planners 4/17/2015 Soil Testing Results i Engineer's Report 8 Edgewood,LLC BIBBO ASSOCIATES, LLP Consulting Engineers -Planners Sheet: 1 of 2 Project: 8 Edgewood LLC. Recorded By: R. Lamontagne Feature: Deep Test Results Date: August 23, 2013 Hole ID: DTH-A Hole ID: DTH-B Depth: Description: Depth: Description: 0 - 10" Top Soil 0 - 10" Top Soil 1011 - 2616 Fine Sandy Loam 1011 - 2611 Fine Sandy Loam 26" - 60" Gray/Brown Med. Sands 2611 - 6011 Gray/Brown Med. Sands w/some Rock w/some Rock 60" Water, No Ledge 60" Water, No Ledge Hole ID: Hole ID: Depth: Description: Depth: Description: 4KBIBBO ASSOCIATES, LLP Consulting Engineers -Planners Sheet: ;L of 2, Project: 8 Edgewood LLC. Recorded By: Rick Lamontagne Feature: Percolation Test Results Date: August 23,2013 Depth to Water Rate Time Start Time Stop From Ground Surface Time Drop Min. 1 Hole ID:Run Min. Min. From In. To In. Min. In. In. J PT S-1 1 10:07 AM 10:37 AM 18.00 18.50 30 0.50 60.00 2 10:43 AM 11:13 AM 15.00 15.25 30 0.25 120.00 3 11:14 AM 11:44 AM 15.50 15.75 30 0.25 120.00 9/12/2014 Environmental Site Remediation Database Search NEW YORK STATE _,DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION Environmental Site Remediation Database Search Details Site Record Administrative Information Site Name: Barbera Residence (a.k.a. Port Refinery) Site Code: 360033 Program: State Superfund Program Classification: C EPA ID Number: Location DEC Region: 3 Address: 55 Hillandale Road City:Rye Brook Zip: 10573 County:WESTCHESTER Latitude: 41.028112010 Longitude: -73.673617972 Site Type: STRUCTURE Estimated Size: 1.000 Acres Site Owner(s) and Operator(s) Current Owner Name: NORMA BARBERA (PORT REFINERY) Current Owner(s) Address: BOX 204, GLENVILLE STATION GREENWICH,CT, 06831 Owner(s) during disposal: NORMA BARBERA (PORT REFINERY) Current On-Site Operator: NORMA BARBERA (PORT REFINERY) Stated Operator(s) Address: ,ZZ Current On-Site Operator: NORMA BARBERA (PORT REFINERY) Stated Operator(s) Address: 55 HILLANDALE ROAD RYE BROOK,NY 10573 Hazardous Waste Disposal Period From: 1970s To: 1990 Site Description Location description: This site is a one acre residential property in the Village of Rye Brook, hftp://www.dec.ny.gov/cftnx/extapps/derexternaVhaz/detalls.cfm 113 9/12/2014 Environmental Site Remediation Database Search Westchester County, near the Connecticut border. Predominant site features: When discovered in 1991, the property consisted of a 2-story house, 2-story garage with a basement, and an in- ground pool. Current use: Vacant residential property. Surrounding uses: The site is bordered by private residences on both sides and the Arbors Townhouse Complex behind the property. Historical sources of contamination: In the early 1990's, the Rye Brook Police Department received complaints about a resident on Hillandale Road mishandling mercury. USEPA was asked to investigate this residence and discovered extensive mercury contamination in a garage and cabana and in many areas on the property where the mercury had been illegally dumped. Investigations/actions performed to date: As part of an emergency removal in 1994, the USEPA removed the garage and the cabana; demolished the pool; and removed more than 6,300 tons of contaminated soil from this and bordering properties. USEPA's removal action included sampling to determine the extent of the contamination; removing the contaminated soil and debris; and confirmatory sampling. Clean soil was brought in to replace contaminated soil, and return the site to the original grade. On April 30, 2004, at the request of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, USEPA conducted an emergency response at the site to remove visible mercury discovered near a rock pile, adjacent to the asphalt walking path on the Arbors condominium property. In May through July 2004, USEPA collected a number of surface soil samples from the Arbors in the area of the path in order to delineate the extent of mercury contamination. Upon the recognition that mercury was present in the soil on neighboring properties, beyond the area of the spill, USEPA expanded its investigation to these neighboring properties. A comprehensive investigation of air, surface and subsurface soil, stream and pond sediment, and groundwater began in September 2004. The cleanup of the Arbors and an adjacent private residence began during in May 2005. During removal operations, a significantly larger quantity of mercury contaminated soil was encountered than originally estimated. In addition, the on-site residence was demolished to allow access to a contaminated drywell and septic tank. Remedial and restoration activities were completed in May 2006. Current actions: The remedial program is complete, however, groundwater monitoring continues. Summary of Project Completion Dates Projects associated with this site are listed in the Project Completion Dates table and are grouped by Operable Unit (OU). A site can be divided into a number of operable units depending on the complexity of the site and the number of issues associated with a site. Sites are often divided into operable units based on the media to be addressed (such as groundwater or contaminated soil), geographic area, or other factors. Contaminants of Concern (Including Materials Disposed) http://www.dec.ny.gov/cfmxtextapps/derexternaVhaz/details.cfm 2/3 9/12/2014 Environmental Site Remediation Database Search Type of Waste Quantity of Waste AND MERCURY (D009) if ELEMENTAL MERCURY (U151 WASTE) UNKNOWN WASTE EP TOXIC FOR CADMIUM (D006), LEAD (D008), If Site Environmental Assessment Remediation at the site is complete. Prior to remediation, the primary contaminant of concern was elemental mercury. A comprehensive investigation of air, surface and subsurface soil, stream and pond sediment, and groundwater began in September 2004. No impacts to special resources were identified. Following completion of the remedial action, the site does not present a significant threat to public health or the environment. Site Health Assessment Exposure to the general public is not expected since this residential property and neighboring properties were cleaned up. Soils, sediments, and building materials found to be contaminated with mercury were removed for proper disposal. Drinking potentially contaminated groundwater is not expected because public water serves this neighborhood. For more Information: E-mail Us Back to Search Results Refine Current Search http://www.dec.ny.gov/cfmx/extapps/derexternaVhaz/details.cfm 3/3 I�rlir�l �Is�wncsrar�nY�l�pil� e � prof7i a bulletins images documents POLREPs contacts links login profile Navigate a oac Port Refinery Rye Brook,NY-EPA Region II � r•�I I .: •. t ,�.r� Bulletins Site Contact: E. Jack Harmon May 13,2006 Update... , : OSt'. List All... harmon lackaeoa.gov teras 55 Hillandale Road t .. Rye Brook,NY 10573 www.epaosc.org/PortReftnery Latitude:41.0283000 t�rdst. ;:r Longitude:-73.6736000 KML RSS location area map bookmark Lies All... I -4-Acr - -r Documents Description of Air _. .. _,.. ,.... -..-..=•e:�aii' -_:,•r;--�• Monitorin December 2.2005 Particulate A... I For weekly updates,visit the Bulletins section. December 1.2005 Particulate A... On April 29,2004,the Village of Rye Brook Police Department received a report of a mercury spill along a paved November 14.2005 walkway in the Village of Rye Brook owned by the Condominium Association of the Arbors at Rye Brook(Arbors).The Particulate... Westchester County Health Department and EPA were contacted and responded to the reported spill.In early May 2004, EPA cleaned up visible elemental mercury found along the walkway and excavated approximately one ton of soil Leat All In the vicinity of the mercury spill.Soil containing elemental mercury was loaded Into drums and stored at the Village POLREPe Police Department shad pending future disposal.In May,June,and July 2004,EPA collected surface soil samples from the Arbors property in the area of the path in order to delineate the area of mercury contamination.Upon determining None for this site. that the mercury contamination was present In the soil on a few neighboring properties beyond the area of the spill,EPA contacts expanded its Investigation to several neighboring properties.A comprehensive Investigation of air,surface and OSC subsurface soil,storm drainage system sediment,and groundwater began on September 15,2004 and was completed harnon.lack@eoa.9pvv on December 17,2004. Media Relations The Investigation revealed that surface soil in some areas of the Arbors property �c A aurin@epa.aov 9 p party common area and on 55 Hillandale public Affairs Road are contaminated with mercury above the EPA Site cleanup level of 10 parts per million(ppm).The contamination echols.cecilia@epa.Dov appears to emanate from three primary source areas,a rock pile on the Arbors property and from two vaults on the 55 Hillandale Road property.One of the vaults exhibited the highest overall mercury concentration.The highest mercury Ust All... concentration adjacent to the paved walkway on the Arbors property was 1,300 parts per million(ppm).Elevated levels Links of mercury in the surface soils were also found in other isolated areas,at the base of three large trees on the Arbors Toxicolo°ical Profile for property and at depressions in the soil surface.Generally,analytical results reveal that mercury Is not present in soils at depths greater than one foot in depth at concentrations above 10 ppm,with the exception of soil In and around the main SED UA's source areas and in areas around the base of the three trees discussed above.Mercury concentrations in the SEP .. subsurface soil ranged from non-detect to 160 Webpa°e... g ppm,adjacent to the paved walkway on the Arbors property. Village of Rye Brock... Two subsurface vaults filled with vessels which may have contained or may contain mercury,were discovered during List All... the assessment at 55 Hillandale Road.One vault that is suspected of being a former hand-dug well,was located adjacent to the rear patio.The other vault,located in the front of the property is a former septic tank.Both vaults were opened and found to contain numerous bottles,cylinders and other laboratory containers which were determined to be of the type used for transporting and handling elemental mercury.Analytical results of water and soil samples collected from the former hand dug well revealed mercury concentrations significantly greater than any other samples collected onsite.Additionally,seven piezometers(micro-wells)in the vicinity of this abandoned well had elevated concentrations of mercury in groundwater.It Is clear that this vault represents a significant source of mercury contamination. Mercury contamination in sediments that exceed the Site specific cleanup level of 10 ppm was identified in all thee small ponds,i.e.,two ponds on 51 Hillandale Road and in one pond on 20 Hillandale Road.There are also isolated locations In a stream channel that is part of the storm drainage system where mercury concentrations in sediment exceed 10 ppm.Mercury concentrations in sediments ranged from non-detect to 1,900 ppm,the later value being detected in the 51 Hillandale Road pond that's closer to the spill area. In October 2004,EPA conducted indoor air screening inside 16 single-family homes on Hillandale Road and inside four condominiums at the Arbors.Only 55 Hillandale Road contained levels over EPA's indoor air cleanup goal of 0.3 pglm3. In response to the elevated mercury vapor levels inside 55 Hillandale Road,EPA installed a mercury air filter and a heat recovery ventilation system in the basement,sealed the walls and floors of the basement with water sealant paint and fabricated a cover for the basement sump.Subsequent indoor air sampling within 55 Hillandale Road Indicates that these actions effectively reduced the mercury levels.However,there is a concern that higher mercury readings may occur In the air when wanner weather arrives in summer(most screening events have been in late fall/early winter, during cool temperatures). For additional information,visit the Bulletins section. web sites I regional web saes I profile I bullaUnsI images I documents I POLREPs I contactsUnks I profile bulletins images documents Pa.REPs contacts links login bulleBrrs ibspate opm ase Port Refinery All Bulletins f4M i� Click Column Name to Sort.(43 Bulletins) Pace slza rKL Cat Bulletin- Posted All Bulletins May 13,2006 Update 5/15/2006 During the weeks of May 15th and May 22nd,WRS will remobilize and conduct restoration work.Areas eroded from surface water runoff and areas where grass seed has not produced growth will be addressed.Most of the Arbors'common surface areas along the asphalt walkway will be raked followed by an application of grass seed,fertilizer and chaff.To alleviate a small area of ponding,a shallow swale will be put In and then sodded.Due to the surface erosion,the two small ponds on 51 Hillandale Road will have sand removed.Two dead trees will be replaced.Attention on 55 HIIlandle Road will also see the property raked,grass seed/fertilizer and chaff applied. March 31,2006 Update 4/4/2006 During the week of March 27th,the cleanup contractor continued to concentrate their efforts on restoring the 55 Hillandale property.Two more loads of topsoil were delivered and stockpiled for later use.Shrubbery removed during the excavations was replaced along the property boundaries at the rear and southern side.A section of silt fencing was Installed at the roadside edge.An additional trailer load of supplies and materials amassed over the course of the removal action was l returned to storage. The contractor's on-site workforce Includes a foreman/equipment operator and one laborer.Equipment consists of one skid steer,one mint excavator and a small dozer. During the week of April 3rd,restoration activities will continue.Utilities are scheduled to be disconnected on Wednesday and the office trailer removed on Thursday. i March 24,2006 Update 3/29/2006 During the week of March 20th,the cleanup contractor continued to concentrate their efforts on restoring the 55 Hillandale property.A small dozer continued grading the property to original elevations.A trailer load of supplies and materials amassed I over the course of the removal action was returned to storage.Seven piezometers or micro-wells were installed on the 55 Hillandale Road property.These piezometers will be utilized to monitor groundwater quality on a quarterly basis for at least the next year. The contractor's on-site supervisor and field accountant demobilized on Friday leaving only a foreman/equipment operator and one laborer.Equipment consists of one skid steer,one mini excavator and a small dozer. During the week of March 27th,organizing the accumulated materials and supplies will continue.Two additional loads of topsoil will be delivered and spread over the rear portion of 55 Hillandale Road.After which,grass seed,fertilizer and hay will be applied.In addition,trees and bushes removed during the excavations will be replaced. March 17,2006 Update 3/21/2006 During the week,the cleanup contractor concentrated their efforts on restoring the 55 Hillandale property.A survey was conducted and grade stakes installed to establish original elevations.Topsoil was then spread to the original elevations.The temporary fencing was taken down on Wednesday.Accumulated materials and supplies were organized and will be returned to off-site storage facilities. 1 The contractor's on-site supervisor and field accountant demobilized on Friday leaving only a foreman/equipment operator and one laborer.Equipment consists of one skid steer,one mini excavator and a small dozer. During the week of March 20th,organizing the accumulated materials and supplies will continue.Ten piezometers or micro- wells will be Installed on the 55 Hillandale Road property.These piezometers will be utilized to monitor groundwater quality on a quarterly basis for at least the next year.Once the piezometers are installed,grass seed and fertilizer will be applied and i then covered with straw. March 10,2006 Update 3/14/2006 During the week,the cleanup contractor concentrated their efforts on restoring the property around pond#4.Topsoil was spread and grass seed and fertilizer applied prior to the area being covered with hay.At 55 Hillandale Road,a chain link fence that was removed last May,at the boundary between with the Arbors,was reestablished.Additional loads of topsoil were delivered and stockpiled.The clutter of materials and supplies accumulated over the past ten months is being organized and will be either discarded or returned to off-site storage facilities in preparation for the temporary fencing being taken down. One equipment operator and one laborer were demobilized leaving a smaller work force of a supervisor,foreman/equipment operator,one laborer and a field accountant.Equipment consists of one skid steer,one mini excavator and a small dozer. During the week of March 13th,organizing the accumulated materials and supplies will continue and the temporary fencing will be removed.Additional loads of topsoil will be delivered and stockpiled. March 3,2006 Update 318/2006 Removal of sediments from pond#4 was completed.For the week, 118 one-cubic yard boxes were filled,for a total of 648. Six additional trucks were loaded for off-site disposal,for a total of 22.Since it services are no longer required,the medium sized excavator was demobilized.Restoration of the area surrounding the pond as well as impacted areas from the operations i were initiated. The contractor has a work force consisting of a supervisor,foreman,equipment operator,two laborers,and a field accountant. Equipment consists of two skid steers,one mini excavator and a small dozer. During the week of March 6th,the office trailer will be moved closer to Hillandale Road so that the temporary roadbed material can be removed.Also, restoration of areas around pond#4 will be completed.Efforts to take down the temporary fencing will also commence. February 24,2006 Update 3/1/2006 Removal of sediments from pond#4 continued.Sediments are being placed into one-cubic yard boxes and then staged in the front yard until box trailers can be arranged for their pickup for off-site disposal.For the week,301 one�cubic yard boxes were filled for a total of 430.Eleven trucks were loaded-out bringing the total number of truck loads to 16. Since all mercury contaminated soil has been shipped off-site,air monftoring/sampling Is no longer being implemented. The contractor has a work force consisting of a supervisor,foreman,equipment operator,three laborers,and a field accountant.Equipment consists of one skid steer,one mini excavator,one medium excavator and a small dozer. During the week of February 27th,the removal of sediments from pond#4 will be completed and the medium size excavator demobilized. February 17,2006 Update 2122/2006 Removal of sediments from pond#4 was inlated on Tuesday.Sediments are being placed Into onecubic yard boxes and then staged In the front yard until box trailers can be arranged for their pickup for off-site disposal.Thru Friday,a total of 129 boxes were filled and five trucks loaded for off-site disposal. Since all mercury contaminated soil has been shipped off-site,air monitoring/sampling Is no longer being implemented. The contractor has a work force consisting of a supervisor,foreman,equipment operator,three laborers,and a field accountant.Equipment consists of one skid steer,one mini excavator,one medium excavator and a small dozer. During the week of February 20th,the removal of sediments from pond#4 will continue as well as daily load-outs of boxed sediments. February 10,2006 Update 2/14/2006 Removal of sediments from pond#3 was completed.A total of 60 one-cubic yard boxes were filled and brought to the Site for staging.Transportation and disposal of these boxes are tentatively scheduled for Wednesday,February 151h.The Impacted area around pond#3 was restored as was the pathway leading into this area.Final restoration of this area will occur in the spring.Site operations were moved to pond#4 where preparations were completed with removal of sediments expected to begin on Tuesday,February 14th.Similar to the operations at pond#3,sediments will be placed into one-cubic yard boxes and then staged in the front yard until box trailers can be arranged for their pickup for offsite disposal.It is expected,that two trucks will be loaded each day until this component of the removal Is completed. Since all mercury contaminated soil has been shipped off-site,air monitoring/sampling is no longer being Implemented. The contractor has a work force consisting of a supervisor,foreman,equipment operator,two laborers,and a field accountant. Equipment consists of one skid steer,one mini excavator,one medium excavator and a small dozer. During the week of February 13th,removal of sediments from pond#4 will be Initiated and daily load-outs of boxes sediments will occur. February 3,2006 Update 217/2006 Site operations continued to be focused on removing sediments from pond#3.A mini-excavator is being utilized for excavating the sediments and for placing the sediments Into lined one-cubic yard boxes.After the boxes are filled,they're secured by metal bands and then brought to the 55 Hillandale property by a skid steer where they're staged pending transportation and disposal.In addition to work in pond#3,topsoil continues to be delivered and stockpiled. Since all mercury contaminated soil has been shipped off-site,air monitoring/sampling is no longer being implemented. The contractor has a work force consisting of a supervisor,foreman,equipment operator,two laborers,and a field accountant. Equipment consists of one skid steer and one medium excavator and a small dozer. During the week of February 6th,removal of sediments from pond#3 should be completed and the area surrounding as well as the pathway restored.Preparations for removal of sediments from pond#4 will also be made. January 27,2006 Update 1/31/2006 Site operations continued to be focused on stabilizing the muddy conditions within the property boundaries at 55 Hillandale Road.In addition,removal of sediments from pond#3 resumed.A mini-excavator is being used to remove the sediments and placing them into plastic lined one-cubic yard boxes.After the boxes are filled and secured with metal banding,they're being brought to 55 Hillandale pending transportation and disposal arrangements. Since all mercury contaminated soil has been shipped off-site,air monitoring/sampling is no longer being implemented. The contractor has a work force consisting of a supervisor,foreman,equipment operator,two laborers,and a field accountant. Equipment consists of one skid steer and one medium excavator and a small dozer. During the week of January 30th,backfilling,compaction and rough grading of the 55 Hillandale Road property will continue along with sediment removal from pond#3. January 20,2006 Update 1/24/2006 Site operations continued to be focused on stabilizing the muddy conditions within the property boundaries at 55 Hillandale Road.On Monday,January 13th,all drums that contained the previously generated empty mercury containers,from the cesspool and abandoned well,were picked-up and tranported to a recyclingidisposal facility.Post excavation sampling results,to date, Indicate that the average concentration of mercury is 1.4 parts per million(ppm),well below the cleanup goal of 10 ppm. One of EPA's regional risk assessors visited the Site in preparation for evaluating the site for rebuilding by the site's property owners.All soil,groundwater,and soil gas data will be evaluated. Since all mercury contaminated soli has been shipped off-site,air monitoring/sampling is no longer being implemented. The contractor has a work force consisting of a supervisor,foreman,equipment operator,two laborers,and a field accountant. Equipment consists of one skid steer and one medium excavator and a small dozer. During the week of January 23th,backfilling,compaction and rough grading of the 55 Hillandale Road property will continue. January 13,2006 Update 1/16/2006 Site operations resumed on Tuesday,January 10th.During the week,the ERRS contractor,Westinghouse Remedlation Services,focused their attention on stabilizing mud within the property boundaries at 55 Hillandale Road.Hazardous waste profiles were completed and disposal arrangements finalized for drums containing empty mercury containers.The empty mercury containers were extricated from the cesspool at the front of the property as well as from the abandoned well on the Site.One last load of mercury contaminated soil was shipped for off-site disposal on Thursday.This one load brings the totals to 373 loads and approximately 9,350 tons.Post excavation sampling results,to date,indicate that the average concentration of mercury is 1.4 parts per million(ppm),well below the cleanup goal of 10 ppm. Since all mercury contaminated soil has been shipped off-site,air monitodng/sampling is no longer being Implemented. The contractor has a work force consisting of a supervisor,foreman,equipment operator,two laborers,and a field accountant. Equipment consists of one skid steer and one medium excavator and a small dozer.A medium sized roller/compactor will be delivered on Monday,January 16th to address the compaction of the fill. r During the week of Jana 16th backfilling compaction and rough grading of the 55 Hillandale Road property j 9 January 9 P 9 9 9 p party will continue. Also,18 drums containing empty mercury containers will be picked-up and transported off-site for treatment,disposal,and/or reclamation. December 16,2005 Update 12/21/2005 During the week of December 12th,the ERRS contractor,Westinghouse Remediation Services,continued excavation and backfilling operations in the front and sideyard of 55 Hillandale Road.Twenty-six trucks were loaded which brings the total to date to 384 or,approximately 9,600 tons.Clean fill continued to be delivered and areas of excavations filled.Post excavation sampling results,to date,Indicate that the average concentration of mercury is 1.4 parts per million(ppm),well below the cleanup goal of 10 ppm. Air monitoring/sampling is being employed with monitors being placed at one upwind location and two downwind locations. Since operations are now in the front yard of 55 Hillandale Road,at a much further distance from the Arbors,air monitoring/sampling will no longer be established at the Arbors.The monitor/sampler that was set-up in the Arbors will now be utilized,when needed,at an additional downwind location.Daily particulate readings are being provided on the website.High humidity and certainly rairUsnow will affect the air monitoring equipment so,during these conditions,there will be no air monitoring/sampling.Also,air monitoring/sampling will be conducted only when excavation of contaminated soil is occurring. No air monitoring/sampling will occur when there is just backfilling.A review of site operations is invoked once particulate readings exceed 100 pg/m3 over recorded background readings.The particulate monitors collect and record all particulates, i.e.,dust,pollen,water vapor,soil particles and/or all other fine grained particles that are entrained within the ambient air. Background readings were recorded in mid-May when there was no soil disturbance and are also posted on the website. The contractor has a work force consisting of a supervisor,foreman,equipment operator,two laborers,and a field accountant. Equipment consists of one skid steer and two medium excavators.A small dozer and a roller/compactor are being used for the backfilling/topsoil operations. During the week of December 19th backfilling operations will continue.Excavation and load-out of dump trailers is expected to be completed pending post excavation sample results.A catch basin and piping associated with the storm water management system will be installed an the Arbors common property and after its installation,the temporary fencing will be repositioned on the property boundary with 55 Hillandale Road.The project will shutdown until January 10th,at which time backfilling will be continue until completion. December 09,2005 Update 12/13/2005 Due to an injury sustained while playing basketball and resulting recuperative period during the week of December 5th,no update was provided for the week of November 28th.This update will cover both the weeks of November 28th and December 5th.During the week of November 28th,the ERRS contractor,Westinghouse Remediation Services,continued excavation and backfilling operations in the front and sideyard of 55 Hillandale Road.Fourteen trucks were loaded which brings the total to date to 358 or,approximately 8,200 tons.In addition,Clean Harbors continued vacuum operations on pond#3.During the week of December 5th,no load-outs occurred.Clean fill was delivered and areas of excavations filled.Clean Harbors continued vacuum operations on pond f/3.Post excavation sampling results,to date,indicate that the average concentration of mercury is 1.4 parts per million(ppm),well below the cleanup goal of 10 ppm.The onset of winter and a forecast that it will continue has resulted in the discontinuing of vacuum operations until sometime in spring. Air monitoring/sampling Is being employed with monitors being placed at one upwind location and two downwind locations. Since operations are now in the front yard of 55 Hillandale Road,at a much further distance from the Arbors,air monitoring/sampling will no longer be established at the Arbors.The monitor/sampler that was set-up In the Arbors will now be utilized,when needed,at an additional downwind location.Daily particulate readings are being provided on the website.High humidity and certainly rain/snow will affect the air monitoring equipment so,during these conditions,there will be no air monitoring/sampling.Also,air monitoring/sampling will be conducted only when excavation of contaminated soil is occurring. No air monitoring/sampling will occur when there is just backfilling.A review of site operations Is invoked once particulate readings exceed 100 pg/m3 over recorded background readings.The particulate monitors collect and record all particulates, i.e.,dust,pollen,water vapor,soil particles and/or all other fine grained particles that are entrained within the ambient air. Background readings were recorded in mid-May when there was no soil disturbance and are also posted on the website. The contractor has a work force consisting of a supervisor,foreman,equipment operator,two laborers,and a field accountant. Equipment consists of one skid steer and two medium excavators.A small dozer and a roller/compactor are being used for the backfilling/topsoil operations. During the week of December 12th,backfllling operations will continue.Excavation and load-out of dump trailers will also continue.A catch basin and piping associated with the storm water management system will be installed on the Arbors common property and after its installation,the temporary fencing will be repositioned on the property boundary with 55 Hillandale Road. November 25,2005 Update 11/29/2005 During the week of November 14th,the ERRS contractor,Westinghouse Remediation Services,continued excavation and backfilling operations in the front and sideyard of 55 Hillandale Road.Twenty trucks were loaded which brings the total to date to 344 or,approximately 7,900 tons.The foundation walls and floor were broken in manageable pieces with a hydraulic hammer and have been removed.Post excavation sampling results,to date,indicate that the average concentration of mercury is 1.4 parts per mlllion(ppm),well below the cleanup goat of 10 ppm.Clean Harbors continued with their contracted work.Sediments from the front pond at 51 Hillandale Road were vacuumed and post vacuuming sampling results were achieved.A sound barrier was constructed that will be used to buffer the noise that will be generated by the vacuum truck when its setup on Hillandale Road.Flagmen will be assigned to control traffic during the vacuuming operations. Air monitoring/sampling is being employed with monitors being placed at one upwind location and two downwind locations. Since operations are now in the front yard of 55 Hillandale Road,at a much further distance from the Arbors,air monitoring/sampling will no longer be established at the Arbors.The monitor/sampler that was set-up in the Arbors will now be utilized,when needed,at an additional downwind location.Daily particulate readings are being provided on the website.High humidity and certainly rain will affect the air monitoring equipment so,during these conditions,there will be no air monitoring/sampling.A review of site operations is invoked once particulate readings exceed 100 pg/m3 over recorded background readings.The particulate monitors collect and record all particulates,i.e.,dust,pollen,water vapor,soil particles and/or all other fine grained particles that are entrained within the ambient air.Background readings were recorded in mid-May when there was no soil disturbance and are also posted on the website. The contractor has a work force consisting of a supervisor,foreman,equipment operator,four laborers,and a field accountant.Equipment consists of one skid steer and two medium excavators.A small dozer and a roller/compactor are being used for the backfilling/topsoil operations. During the week of November 21st,no site work was undertaken.Operations will resume on Tuesday,November 29th.Load- outs of dump trailers and deliveries of backfill will continue.In addition,Clean Harbors will set-up and begin vacuuming sediments from pond#3.While the vacuum truck is positioned on Hillandale Road,sound barriers will be erected around it to muffle the noise. November 11,2005 Update 11/14/2005 During the week of November 7th,the ERRS contractor,Westinghouse Remediation Services,continued excavation and backfilling operations in the front and backyard of 55 Hillandale Road.Twenty-five trucks were loaded which brings the total to date to 324 or,approximately 7,400 tons.In addition,the foundation walls and floor were broken in manageable pieces with a hydraulic hammer.The suspected former well was accessed and only one drum,i.e.,35,of empty metal containers were retrieved.Post excavation sampling results,to date,indicate that the average concentration of mercury is 1 A parts per million(ppm),well below the cleanup goal of 10 ppm.Clean Harbors mobilized on Monday and initiated their contracted work. The underground pipe associated with the stone management system that links the ponds on 51 Hillandale Road was cleaned in preparation to videotaping.A blockage,approximately at the midway point,resulted in much longer effort.The rear pond was vacuumed with the front pond scheduled for vacuuming on Monday,November 14th.A sound barrier was constructed that will be used to buffer the noise that will be generated by the vacuum truck when its setup on Hillandale Road.The EPA's Environmental Response Team and their contractor were on site Wednesday to collect a round of overburden and shallow bedrock groundwater samples. Air monitoring/sampling is being employed with monitors being placed at one upwind location and two downwind locations. Since operations are now in the front yard of 55 Hillandale Road,at a much further distance from the Arbors,air monitoring/sampling will no longer be established at the Arbors.The monitor/sampler that was set-up In the Arbors will now be utilized,when needed,at an additional downwind location.Daily particulate readings are being provided on the website.High humidity and certainly rain will affect the air monitoring equipment so,during these conditions,there will be no air monitoring/sampiing.A review of site operations Is Invoked once particulate readings exceed 100 pg/m3 over recorded background readings.The particulate monitors collect and record all particulates,i.e.,dust,pollen,water vapor,soil particles and/or all other fine grained particles that are entrained within the ambient air.Background readings were recorded in mid-May when there was no soil disturbance and are also posted on the website. The contractor has a work force consisting of a supervisor,foreman,equipment operator,four laborers,and a field accountant.Equipment consists of one skid steer and two medium excavators.A small dozer and a rolledcompactor are being used for the backfilling/topsoil operations. During the week of November 14th,load-outs of dump trailers,demo debris,and deliveries of backfill will continue.In addition,Clean Harbors will continue to vacuum pond/stream sediments.While the vacuum truck is positioned on Hillandale Road,sound barriers will be erected around it to muffle the noise. During the week of November 21st,the site will shut down for the Thanksgiving Holiday.Work will resume on Monday, November 28th. November 04,2005 Update 11/7/2005 During the week of October 31st,the ERRS contractor,Westinghouse Remediation Services,continued excavation and backfilling operations in the backyard of 55 Hillandale Road.Forty-seven trucks were loaded which brings the total to date to 299 or,approximately 6,800 tons.An additional 100 empty metal containers were removed from the former septic tank (cesspool)and placed Into drums for off-site disposal,bringing the total to more than 250.Post excavation sampling results, to date,Indicate that the average concentration of mercury is 1.4 parts per million(ppm),well below the cleanup goal of 10 ppm. Air monitodng/sampling Is being employed with monitors being placed at one upwind location and two downwind locations. Since operations are now in the front yard of 55 Hillandale Road,at a much further distance from the Arbors,air monitoring/sampling will no longer be established at the Arbors.The monitor/sample that was set-up in the Arbors will now be utilized,when needed,at an additional downwind location.Daily particulate readings are being provided on the website.High humidity and certainly rain will affect the air monitoring equipment so,during these conditions,there will be no air monitoring/sampling.A review of site operations is Invoked once particulate readings exceed 100 pg/m3 over recorded background readings.The particulate monitors collect and record all particulates,i.e.,dust,pollen,water vapor,soil particles and/or all other fine grained particles that are entrained within the ambient air.Background readings were recorded in mid-May when there was no soil disturbance and are also posted on the website. The contractor has a work force consisting of a supervisor,foreman,equipment operator,two laborers,and a field accountant. Equipment consists of one skid steer and two medium excavators.A small dozer is being used for the backfllling/topsoil operations. During the week of November 7th,load-outs of dump trailers,demo debris,and deliveries of backfill will continue.A hydraulic hammer will be delivered for breaking up the concrete foundation into manageable pieces.In addition,Clean Harbors will mobilize to the Site on Monday and the underground pipes connecting the storm water management ponds will be videotaped. Afterward,Clean Harbors will commence with vacuuming of pond/stmam sediments.If all goes well,they should be done by week's end.While the vacuum truck is positioned on Hillandale Road,sound barters will be erected around it to muffle the noise.Also occurring this week are collections of groundwater samples from remaining plezometers and monitoring wells. October 28,2005 Update 11/1/2005 During the week of October 24th,the ERRS contractor,Westinghouse Remediation Services,resumed excavation and backfilling operations in the backyard of 55 Hillandale Road.Due to the heavy rainfall on Tuesday,no load-outs or delivery of fill occurred.During those two days,load-outs of demo debris continued and access gained access Into a former septic tank on the front portion of the property.More than 150 empty metal containers were removed from the former septic tank and placed Into drums for off-site disposal.Twenty trucks were loaded which brings the total to date to 252 or,approximately 5,750 tons.Post excavation sampling results,to date,indicate that the average concentration of mercury is 1.4 parts per million(ppm),well below the cleanup goal of 10 ppm. Air monitoring/sampling Is being employed with monitors being placed at one upwind location and two downwind locations. Since operations are now in the front yard of 55 Hillandale Road,at a much further distance from the Arbors,air monitodng/sampling will no longer be established at the Arbors.The monitor/sample that was set-up in the Arbors will now be utilized,when needed,at an additional downwind location.Daily particulate readings are being provided an the website.High humidity and certainly rain will affect the air monitoring equipment so,during these conditions,there will be no air monitoring/sampling.A review of site operations is invoked once particulate readings exceed 100 pg/m3 over recorded background readings.The particulate monitors collect and record all particulates,i.e.,dust,pollen,water vapor,soil particles and/or all other fine grained particles that are entrained within the ambient air.Background readings were recorded in mid-May when there was no soil disturbance and are also posted on the website. The contractor has a work force consisting of a supervisor,foreman,equipment operator,two laborers,and a field accountant. Equipment consists of one skid steer and two medium excavators.A small dozer is being used for the backfilling/topsoil operations. During the week of October 31st,load-outs of dump trailers,demo debris,and deliveries of backfill will continue.A hydraulic hammer attachment on one of the excavators will be utilized to breakup the concrete foundation into manageable pieces. Arrangements are being made for loading-out 15 to 20 dump trailers per day.These arrangements will call for a staggered arrival so that this number of trucks will not impact regular traffic on Hillandale Road.Due to the wet site conditions, vacuuming of pond and stream sediments has been postponed to a later date. October 21,2005 Update 10/24/2005 During the week of October 17th,the ERRS contractor,Westinghouse Remediation Services,resumed excavation and backfilling operations in the backyard of 55 Hillandale Road.Twenty-six trucks were loaded that brings the total to date to 232 or,approximately 5,300 tons.Post excavation sampling results,to date,indicate that the average concentration of mercury is 1.5 parts per million(ppm),well below the cleanup goal of 10 ppm.A final Inspection was conducted and demolition of the 55 Hillandale residence occurred an Wednesday. Air monitoring/sampling Is being employed with monitors being placed at locations upwind,downwind,and adjacent to the Arbors.Daily particulate readings are being provided on the website.High humidity and certainly rain will affect the air monitoring equipment so,during these conditions,there will be no air monitoring/sampling.A review of site operations is Invoked once particulate readings exceed 100 pg/m3 over recorded background readings.The particulate monitors collect and record all particulates,i.e.,dust,pollen,water vapor,soil particles and/or all other fine grained particles that are entrained within the ambient air.Background readings were recorded in mid-May when there was no soil disturbance and are posted on the website. The contractor has a work force consisting of a supervisor,foreman,equipment operator,two laborers,and a field accountant. Equipment consists of one skid steer and two medium excavators.A small dozer is being used for the backfilling/topsoil operations. During the week of October 24th,load-outs of dump trailers will continue as well as backfill deliveries.Arrangements are being made for loading-out 15 to 20 dump trailers per day.These arrangements will call for a staggered arrival so that this number of trucks will not impact regular traffic on Hillandale Road.It's anticipated that vacuuming of pond and stream sediments will commence during the week of October 31st. October 14,2005 Update 10/17/2005 During the week of October 10th,the ERRS contractor,Westinghouse Remediation Services,continued excavation and backfilling operations in the backyard of 55 Hillandale Road.Due to the rainy reporting period only twelve trailers were loaded that brings the total to date to 206 or,approximately 4,700 tons.Post excavation sampling results,to date,indicate that the average concentration of mercury is 1.5 parts per million(ppm),well below the cleanup goal of 10 ppm.Final prepartions were completed for demolishing the house. Air monitoring/sampling is being employed with monitors being placed at locations upwind,downwind,and adjacent to the Arbors.Daily particulate readings are being provided on the website.High humidity and certainly rein will affect the air monitoring equipment so,during these conditions,there will be no air monitoring/sampling.A review of site operations is Invoked once particulate readings exceed 100 pg/m3 over recorded background readings.The particulate monitors collect and record all particulates,I.e.,dust,pollen,water vapor,soil particles and/or all other fine grained particles that are entrained within the ambient air.Background readings were recorded In mid-May when there was no soil disturbance and are posted on the website.Due to the rainy reporting period,no air monitoring was conducted. The contractor has a work force consisting of a supervisor,foreman,equipment operator,two laborers,and a field accountant. Equipment consists of one skid steer,one medium excavator and one larger sized excavator.A small dozer is being used for the backfilling/topsoil operations. During the week of October 17th,load-outs of dump trailers will resume as well as backfill deliveries.Arrangements are being made for loading-out 15 to 20 dump trailers per day.These arrangements will call for a staggered arrival so that this number of trucks will not Impact regular traffic on Hillandale Road.It's anticipated that the house will be domolished during the later part of the week. October 07,2005 Update 10/11/2005 During the week of October 03rd,the ERRS contractor,Westinghouse Remediation Services,continued excavation and backfilling operations In the backyard of 55 Hillandale Road.Thirty trailers were loaded that brings the total to date to 194 or, approximately 4,400 tons.Post excavation sampling results,to date,Indicate that the average concentration of mercury is 1.6 parts per million(ppm),well below the cleanup goal of 10 ppm. Air monitoring/sampling is being employed with monitors being placed at locations upwind,downwind,and adjacent to the Arbors.Daily particulate readings are being provided on the website.High humidity and certainly rein will affect the air monitoring equipment so,during these conditions,there will be no air monitoring/sampling.A review of site operations is Invoked once particulate readings exceed 100 pg/m3 over recorded background readings.The particulate monitors collect and record all particulates,i.e.,dust,pollen,water vapor,soil particles and/or all other fine grained particles that are entrained within the ambient air.Background readings were recorded in mid-May when there was no soil disturbance and are posted on the website. The contractor has a work force consisting of a supervisor,foreman,equipment operator,two laborers,and a field accountant. Equipment consists of one skid steer,two medium sized excavators.A small dozer is being used for the backfilling/topsoii operations.During the week of October 10th,the two medium excavators will be replaced with one larger sized excavator that can be fitted with a grapple attachment,that will be utilized in demolishing the house. During the week of October 10th,load-outs of dump trailers will continue as well as backfill deliveries.Arrangements are being made for loading-out 15 to 20 dump trailers per day.These arrangements will call for a staggered arrival so that this number of trucks will not Impact regular traffic on Hillandale Road.A utility pole will be erected and electricity will be supplied to the office trailer.Excavation of the backyard at 55 Hillandale Road will continue to proceed from the rear area toward the house.Once the excavation of this area is completed and backfilled,the house will be demolished. September 30,2005 Update 10/3/2005 During the week of September 26th,the ERRS contractor,Westinghouse Remediation Services,continued excavation and backfilling operations in the backyard of 55 Hillandale Road.Thirty-three trailers were loaded that brings the total to date to 164 or,approximately 3,100 tons.Post excavation sampling results,to date,indicate that the average concentration of mercury is 1.6 parts per million(ppm),well below the cleanup goal of 10 ppm. Air monitoring/sampling is being employed with monitors being placed at locations upwind,downwind,and adjacent to the Arbors.Daily particulate readings are being provided on the website.High humidity and certainly rain will affect the air monitoring equipment so,during these conditions,there will be no air monitoring/sampling.A review of site operations is invoked once particulate readings exceed 100 pg/m3 over recorded background readings.The particulate monitors collect and record all particulates,i.e.,dust,pollen,water vapor,soil particles and/or all other fine grained particles that are entrained within the ambient air.Background readings were recorded in mid-May when there was no soil disturbance and are posted on the website. The contractor has a work force consisting of a supervisor,foreman,equipment operator,two laborers,and a field accountant. Equipment consists of one skid steer,two medium sized excavators.A small dozer is being used for the backfilling/topsoil operations. During the week of October 3rd,load-outs of dump trailers will continue as well as backfill deliveries.Arrangements are being made for loading-out 15 to 20 dump trailers per day.These arrangements will call for a staggered arrival so that this number of trucks will not impact regular traffic on Hillandale Road.A utility pole will be erected and electricity will be supplied to the office trailer.Excavation of the backyard at 55 Hillandale Road will continue to proceed from the rear area toward the house. Once the excavation of this area is completed and backfilled,the house will be demolished. September 23,2005 Update 9/26/2005 During the week of September 19th,the ERRS contractor,Westinghouse Remediation Services,continued excavation operations in the backyard of 55 Hillandale Road and continued backfilling of the excavated areas in the Arbors area.Fifteen dump trailers were loaded that brings the total to date to 131 or,approximately 2,600 tons.The office trailer was repositioned at the rear of the work site along with the generator.By doing so,the backyard is fully accessible for excavation and loading- out trucks. Air monitoring/sampling is being employed with monitors being placed at locations upwind,downwind,and adjacent to the Arbors.Daily particulate readings are being provided on the website.High humidity and certainly rain will affect the air monitoring equipment so,during these conditions,there will be no air monitoring/sampling.A review of site operations Is Invoked once particulate readings exceed 100 pg/m3 over recorded background readings.The particulate monitors collect and record all particulates,i.e.,dust,pollen,water vapor,soil particles and/or all other fine grained particles that are entrained within the ambient air.Background readings were recorded in mid-May when there was no soil disturbance and are posted on the website. The contractor has a work force consisting of a supervisor,foreman,equipment operator,two laborers,and a field accountant. Equipment consists of one skid steer,two medium sized excavators.A small dozer is being used for the backfilling/topsoil operations. During the week of September 26th,load-outs of dump trailers will continue as well as backfill deliveries.Arrangements are being made for loading-out 15 to 20 dump trailers per day.These arrangements will call for a staggered arrival so that this number of trucks will not impact regular traffic on Hillandale Road.A utility pole will be erected and electricity will be supplied to the office trailer.Excavation of the backyard at 55 Hillandale Road will continue to proceed from the rear area toward the house.Once the excavation of this area is completed and backfilled,the house will be demolished. September 16,2005 Update 9/20/2005 During the week of September 12th,the ERRS contractor,Westinghouse Remediation Services,completed excavation activities in the Arbor's area and began backfilling.Twenty-five dump trailers were loaded that brings the total to date to 116 or,approximately 2,200 tons.A new transportation and disposal bid for contaminated soil was solicited and a subcontract was awarded to a different vendor.The new subcontract calls for a minimum of fifteen dump trailers per day which will expedite the schedule for removing contaminated soil from the backyard of 55 Hillandale Road.A new vendor for"clean' backfill was located and samples from the source were collected with results due on Tuesday,September 20th. Air monitoring/sampling is being employed with monitors being placed at locations upwind,downwind,and adjacent to the Arbors.Daily particulate readings are being provided on the website.High humidity and certainly rain will affect the air monitoring equipment so,during these conditions,there will be no air monitodng/sampling.A review of site operations is Invoked once particulate readings exceed 100 pg/m3 over recorded background readings.The particulate monitors collect and record all particulates,i.e.,dust, pollen,water vapor,soil particles and/or all other fine grained particles that are entrained within the ambient air.Background readings were recorded in mid-May when there was no soil disturbance and are posted on the website. The contractor has a work force consisting of a supervisor,foreman,equipment operator,two laborers,and a field accountant. Equipment consists of one skid steer,two medium sized excavators.A small dozer and compactor are being used in the backfilling/topsoil operations. During the week of September 19th,load-outs of dump trailers will continue as well as backfill deliveries.Once the excavated areas have been backfilled,the office trailer and other support zone equipment will be moved back by the temporary fence and reestablished.The moving of the office trailer and other equipment is scheduled for this Saturday,September 24th. Electric will be supplied and the generator retired.Excavation of the backyard at 55 Hillandale Road will continue to proceed from the rear toward the house.Once the excavation of this area is completed and backfilled,the house will be demolished. September 09,2005 Update 9/12/2005 During the week of September 5th,field activities resumed on Wednesday after the Labor Holiday Weekend.The ERRS contractor continued to concentrate site operations on the Arbor's area.Excavation and removal of contaminated soil continued with 14 dump trailers being loaded which brings the total to date to 91 or,approximately 1,800 tons.The desired rate of load-outs is being hampered by the lack of trucks.Pending acceptable results from post excavation samples, excavation within the Arbors was completed.The results from samples collected from potential source areas for"clean" backfill were unacceptable and other sources are being sought. Air monitoring/sampling is being employed with monitors being placed at locations upwind,downwind,and adjacent to the Arbors.Daily particulate readings are being provided on the website.High humidity and certainly rain will affect the air monitoring equipment so,during these conditions,there will be no air monitoring/sampling.A review of site operations is invoked once particulate readings exceed 100 pg/m3 over recorded background readings.The particulate monitors collect and record all particulates,i.e.,dust, pollen,water vapor,soil particles and/or all other fine grained particles that are entrained within the ambient air.Background readings were recorded in mid-May when there was no soil disturbance and are posted on the website. The contractor has a work force consisting of a supervisor,foreman,equipment operator,two laborers,and a field accountant. Equipment consists of one skid steer,two medium sized excavators.A small dozer and compactor are being used in the backfilling/topsoil operations. During the week of September 12th,load-out of dump trailers will continue from the stockpile.Potential sources of clean backfill will be sampled and backfilling will occur once acceptable results are achieved.In order to Increase productivity,the remaining contaminated soils are being"live loaded'Into dump trailers and will not be boxed.It is expected that more trucks will be available for load-outs next week.The desired number is 15 per day. September 02,2005 Update 9/2/2005 During the week of August 29th,field activities continued to be concentrated on the Arbor's area.Excavation and removal of contaminated soil continued with 16 dump trailers being loaded which brings the total to date to 77 or,approximately 1,450 tons.The desired rate of load-outs is being hampered by the lack of trucks.The temporary fence was repositioned so that most of the Arbors area is now open,Including the walkway. Lenses of a grey colored soil below previously identified clean surface soils have Increased the volume of contaminated material generated so far.The mercury levels within this gray colored soil exceed the cleanup level and are being'chased"to ensure all of it is removed.As a result,the estimated time scheduled to complete this area has been exceeded. Air monitoring/sampling Is being employed with monitors being placed at locations upwind,downwind,and adjacent to the Arbors.Daily particulate readings are being provided on the website.High humidity and certainly rain will affect the air monitoring equipment so,during these conditions,there will be no air monitoring/sampling.A review of site operations Is Invoked once particulate readings exceed 100 pg/m3 over recorded background readings.The particulate monitors collect and record all particulates,i.e.,dust,pollen,water vapor,soil particles and/or all other fine grained particles that are entrained within the ambient air.Background readings were recorded In mid-May when there was no soil disturbance and are posted on the website. The contractor has a work force consisting of a supervisor,foreman,equipment operator,two laborers,and a field accountant. Equipment consists of one skid steer,two medium sized excavators.A small dozer and compactor are being used in the backfilling/topsoil operations. There will be no field activities starting on Friday,September 02 or Tuesday,September 06,operations will resume on Wednesday,September 07.When operations resume,contaminated soil will continue to be removed from the Arbors followed by backfilling and restoration with clean backfill and topsoil.In order to increase productivity,the remaining contaminated soils are being'live loaded'into dump trailers and will not be boxed.It is expected that more trucks will be available for load-outs next week.The desired number is 15 per day. August 26,2005 Update 8/30/2005 During the week of August 22nd,field activities continued to be concentrated on the Arbors'area.Clean topsoil was delivered,stockpiled and spread over those areas deemed clean through post excavation sampling.After the topsoil is spread,the area is seeded,fertilized and covered with straw.Acceptance was received from the landfill In Pennsylvania to accept more contaminated soil and load-outs resumed.15 trucks were loaded which brings the total to date to 61 or, approximately 1,150 tons.All remaining drums that being stored within the Village shed were removed and disposed of during the week. Lenses of a gray colored soil below previously identified clean surface soils have Increased the volume of contaminated material generated so far.The mercury levels within this gray colored soil exceed the cleanup level and are being'chased"to ensure all of it is removed.As a result,the estimated time scheduled to complete this area has been exceeded. Air monitoring/sampiing is being employed with monitors being placed at locations upwind,downwind,and adjacent to the Arbors.Daily particulate readings are being provided on the website.High humidity and certainly rain will affect the air monitoring equipment so,during these conditions,there will be no air monitodng/sampling.A review of site operations is Invoked once particulate readings exceed 100 pg/m3 over recorded background readings.The particulate monitors collect and record all particulates,i.e.,dust,pollen,water vapor,soil particles and/or all other fine grained particles that are entrained within the ambient air.Background readings were recorded in mid-May when there was no soil disturbance and are posted on the website.The areas that require further excavation are covered with thick plastic and were not disturbed during the week. The contractor has a work force consisting of a supervisor,foreman,equipment operator,two laborers,and a field accountant. Equipment consists of one skid steer,two medium sized excavators.A small dozer and compactor are being used In the backfilling/topsoil operations. Field activities scheduled for the week of August 29th Include further excavation and removal of mercury contaminated soil from the Arbors'area and continued restoration with clean backfill and topsoil.In order to increase productivity,the remaining contaminated soils are being'live loaded'into dump trailers and will not be boxed. August 19,2005 Update 8/19/2005 During the week of August 15th,field activities continued to be concentrated on the Arbor's area.Clean topsoil was delivered, stockpiled and spread over those areas deemed clean through post excavation sampling.After the topsoil is spread,the area is seeded,fertilized and covered with straw.A portable decontamination pad was installed that will be used to prevent migration off-site of contaminated soil from the load-out of dump trailers.Once acceptance Is granted from the landfill in Pennsylvania to accept more contaminated soil,load-outs will resume.To date,a total of 888 one-cubic yard boxes have been filled and shipped off-site for disposal in 45 truck loads.On Friday morning a yellow-green tracer dye was added to the overburden groundwater that was encountered on the Arbors.By tracking the tracer dye,we'll gain a better understanding of the flow patterns. Lenses of a gray colored soil below previously identified clean surface soils have increased the volume of contaminated material generated so far.The mercury levels within this gray colored soil exceed the cleanup level and are being"chased"to ensure all of it Is removed.As a result,the estimated time scheduled to complete this area has been exceeded. Air monitoring/sampling Is being employed with monitors being placed at locations upwind,downwind,and adjacent to the Arbors.Daily particulate readings are being provided on the website.High humidity and certainly rain will affect the air monitoring equipment so,during these conditions,there will be no air monitoring/sampling.A review of site operations is Invoked once particulate readings exceed 100 pg/m3 over recorded background readings.The particulate monitors collect and record all particulates,i.e.,dust,pollen,water vapor,soil particles and/or all other fine grained particles that are entrained within the ambient air.Background readings were recorded in mid-May when there was no soil disturbance and are posted on the website.The areas that require further excavation are covered with thick plastic and were not disturbed during the week. The contractor has a work force consisting of a supervisor,foreman,equipment operator,two laborers,and a field accountant. Equipment consists of one skid steer,one small and one medium sized excavator.A small dozer and compactor are being used in the backfilling/topsoil operations. Field activities scheduled for the week of August 22st include continued restoration of the Arbors area and will include deliveries of clean backfill and topsoil.In addition,further excavation of contaminated soil will resume.In order to increase productivity,the remaining contaminated soil will be"live loaded"into dump trailers and will not be boxed.To increase productivity with the load-outs,the mini-excavator will be replaced with another medium sized excavator on Monday,the 22nd. August 12,2005 Update 8/17/2005 During the week of August 8th,field activities continued to be concentrated on the Arbor's area.Clean topsoil was delivered, stockpiled and spread over those areas deemed clean through post excavation sampling.The asphalt walkway was reestablished over a compact shoulder stone base.The western section requires more contaminated soil to be removed.The lenses of gray colored soil continue to be followed and stone water basins encountered will be removed and replaced once the contaminated soil is removed.Sixty-six of the 72 grid areas were cleared,i.e.,post excavation sampling results lower than the established cleanup level of 10 parts per million(ppm).The average concentration of mercury in the post excavation samples is 1.7 ppm.To date,a total of 888 one-cubic yard boxes have been filled and shipped off-site for disposal in 45 truck loads. Lenses of a gray colored soil below previously Identified clean surface soils have increased the volume of contaminated material generated so far.The mercury levels within this gray colored soil exceed the cleanup level and are being'chased"to ensure all of it is removed.As a result,the estimated time scheduled to complete this area has been exceeded. Air monitoring/sampling is being employed with monitors being placed at locations upwind,downwind,and adjacent to the Arbors.Daily particulate readings are being provided on the website.High humidity and certainly rain will affect the air monitoring equipment so,during these conditions,there will be no air monitoring/sampling.A review of site operations is Invoked once particulate readings exceed 100 pg/m3 over recorded background readings.The particulate monitors collect and record all particulates,i.e.,dust,pollen,water vapor,soil particles and/or all other fine grained particles that are entrained within the ambient air.Background readings were recorded in mid-May when there was no soil disturbance and are posted on the website.Three days during last week exhibited higher than background readings,i.e.,Monday the 8th,Thursday the 11th, and Friday the 12th.These readings can be attributed to high humidity and to the delivery of topsoil and restoration activities. The areas that require further excavation are covered with thick plastic and were not disturbed during the week. The contractor has a work force consisting of a supervisor,foreman,equipment operator,two laborers,and a field accountant. Equipment consists of one skid steer,one small and one medium sized excavator.A small dozer and compactor are being used in the backfilling/topsoll operations. Field activities scheduled for the week of August 15st Include continued restoration of the Arbors area and will Include deliveries of clean backfill and topsoil.In addition,further excavation of contaminated soil will resume.In order to Increase productivity,the remaining contaminated soil will be live loaded"into dump trailers and will not be boxed. August 05,2005 Update 8/9/2005 During the week of August 1st,field activities continued to be concentrated on the Arbor's area.Clean topsoil was delivered, stockpiled and spread over those areas deemed clean through post excavation sampling.These areas are located on the eastern section of the Arbors.The western section requires more contaminated soil to be removed.The lenses of gray colored soil continue to be followed and stone water basins encountered will be removed and replaced once the contaminated soil is removed.Sixty-six of the 72 grid areas were cleared,i.e.,post excavation sampling results lower than the established cleanup level of 10 parts per million(ppm).The average concentration of mercury in the post excavation samples is 1.7 ppm. During the week, 142 one-cubic yard boxes were filled which brings the total to 888.Five truck loads were shipped for off-site disposal which brings the total to 45. Lenses of a grey colored soil below previously identified clean surface soils have increased the volume of contaminated material generated so far.The mercury levels within this gray colored soil exceed the cleanup level and are being'chased"to ensure all of it is removed.As a result,the estimated time scheduled to complete this area has been exceeded. Air monitodng/sampling is being employed with monitors being placed at locations upwind,downwind,and adjacent to the Arbors.Daily particulate readings are being provided on the website.High humidity and certainly rain will affect the air monitoring equipment so,during these conditions,there will be no air monitodng/sampling.A review of site operations is Invoked once particulate readings exceed 100 pg/m3 over recorded background readings.The particulate monitors collect and record all particulates,i.e.,dust,pollen,water vapor,soil particles and/or all other fine grained particles that are entrained within the ambient air.Background readings were recorded in mid-May when there was no soil disturbance and are posted on the website. The contractor has a work force consisting of a supervisor,foreman,equipment operator,two laborers,and a field accountant. Equipment consists of one skid steer,one small and one medium sized excavator.A small dozer and compactor are being used in the backfilling/topsoil operations. Field activities scheduled for the week of August 1st include continued restoration of the Arbors area and will include deliveries of clean backfill and topsoil.Consolidated Edison will disconnect gas service into 55 Hillandale Road on Monday. July 29,2005 Update 8/3/2005 During the week of July 25th,field activities continued to be concentrated on the Arbor's area.Clean topsoil was delivered, stockpiled and spread over those areas deemed clean through post excavation sampling.These areas are located on the eastern section of the Arbors.The western section requires more contaminated soil to be removed.The lenses of gray colored soil continue to be followed and storm water basins encountered will be removed and replaced once the contaminated soil is removed.Sixty-six of the 72 grid areas were cleared,i.e.,post excavation sampling results lower than the established cleanup level of 10 parts per million(ppm).The average concentration of mercury in the post excavation samples Is 1.7 ppm. During the week,56 one-cubic yard boxes were filled which brings the total to 746.Four truck loads were shipped for off-site disposal which brings the total to 40.A 10,000 gallon portable water tank was delivered on Wednesday that will be used to collect encountered surface/groundwater. Lenses of a gray colored soil below previously identified clean surface soils have Increased the volume of contaminated material generated so far.The mercury levels within this gray colored soil exceed the cleanup level and are being"chased"to ensure all of it Is removed.As a result,the estimated time scheduled to complete this area has been exceeded. Air monitoring/sampling Is being employed with monitors being placed at locations upwind,downwind,and adjacent to the Arbors.Daily particulate readings are being provided on the website.High humidity and certainly rain will affect the air monitoring equipment so,during these conditions,there will be no air monitoring/sampling.Review of the particulate data Indicated that unusually high paniculate readings were recorded on August 1st.Air samples collected during this day will be sent for laboratory analyses.A review of site operations is Invoked once particulate readings are 100 pg/m3 over recorded background readings.Background readings were recorded in mid-May when there was no soil disturbance and are posted on the website. The contractor has a work force consisting of a supervisor,foreman,equipment operator,two laborers,and a field accountant. Equipment consists of one skid steer,one small and one medium sized excavator.A small dozer and compactor are being used In the backfilling/topsoil operations. Field activities scheduled for the week of August 1st include continued restoration as well as scraping and boxing of soil from the Arbors area and off-site shipments.In addition,backfill and topsoil will be delivered and restoration of the Arbors'area will continue. July 22,2005 Update 7/26/2005 During the week of July 18th,field activities continued to be concentrated on removing soil from the Arbor's area.Sixty-six of the 72 grld areas were cleared,i.e.,post excavation sampling results lower than the established cleanup level of 10 parts per million(ppm).The average concentration of mercury in the post excavation samples Is 1.7 ppm.During the week,37 one- cubic yard boxes were filled which brings the total to 690.Three truck loads were shipped for off-site disposal which brings the total to 36.Additional excavations will be undertaken at the nine grid areas that exceed the established cleanup level.On Friday,backfill was delivered and placed Into grid areas where sampling results indicated that the cleanup level had been attained.The backfill was brought up to an elevation 18 Inches from the surface.Topsoil will then be used to bring the excavated areas to grade. Lenses of a gray colored soil below previously identified clean surface soils have Increased the volume of contaminated material generated so far.The mercury levels within this gray colored soil exceed the cleanup level and is being'chased"to ensure all of it is removed.As a result,the estimated time scheduled to complete this area has been exceeded. Air monitoring/sampling is being employed with monitors being placed at locations upwind,downwind,and adjacent to the Arbors.Daily particulate readings are being provided on the website.High humidity and rain certainly will affect the air monitoring equipment so,during these conditions,there will be no air monitoring/sampling.Review of the particulate data Indicated that a couple of days had higher than expected readings and air samples collected on those days were delivered to a laboratory for mercury analysis.Prior to this week,only the June 15th data indicated higher than expected particulate concentrations.Laboratory analysis of the air samples collected Indicated no mercury concentrations. The contractor has a work force consisting of a supervisor,foreman,equipment operator,two laborers,and a field accountant. Equipment consists of one skid steer,one small and one medium sized excavator.A small dozer and compactor were delivered to assist in the backfilling operations. Feld activities scheduled for the week of July 25th Include continued scraping and boxing of soil from the Arbors area and off- site shipments.In addition,backfill and topsoil will be delivered and restoration of the Arbors'area will continue.A 10,000 gallon portable water tank will be delivered on Wednesday and will be use for storing water that will be encountered during deeper excavations. July 15,2005 Update 7/18/2005 During the week of July 11th,field activities continued to be concentrated on removing soil from the Arbor's area.Fifty-six of 65 grid areas were cleared,i.e.,post excavation sampling results lower than the established cleanup level of 10 parts per million(ppm).The average concentration of mercury in the post excavation samples Is 1.66 ppm.During the week,150 one- cubic yard boxes were filled which brings the total to 653.Nine truck loads were shipped for off-site disposal which brings the total to 33.Additional excavations will be undertaken at the nine grid areas that exceed the established cleanup level. Air monitoring/sampling is being employed with monitors being placed at locations upwind,downwind,and adjacent to the Arbors.Daily particulate readings are being provided on the website.High humidity and rein certainly will affect the air monitoring equipment so,during these conditions,there will be no air monitoring/sampling.During the week no air monitoring was able to be implemented.Due to the rain,the soli was dampened sufficiently to prevent any dust from being generated. The contractor has a work force consisting of a supervisor,foreman,equipment operator,two laborers,and a field accountant. Equipment consists of one skid steer,one small and one medium sized excavator. Feld activities scheduled for the week of July 18th include completing the scraping and boxing of soil from the Arbors area and off-site shipments. July 8,2005 Update 7/812005 During the week of July 4th,field activities resumed on Wednesday and were concentrated on removing soil from the Arbor's area.Forty-four of 51 grid areas were cleared,i.e.,post excavation sampling results lower than the established cleanup level of 10 parts per million(ppm).The average concentration of mercury in the post excavation samples is 1.7 ppm.One hundred cubic yard boxes were filled which brings the total to 503.Four truck loads were shipped for off-site disposal which brings the total to 24.Additional excavations will be undertaken at the seven grid areas that exceed the established cleanup level. Air monitoring/sampling is being employed with monitors being placed at locations upwind,downwind,and adjacent to the Arbors.Daily particulate readings are being provided on the website.High humidity and rain certainly will affect the air monitoring equipment so,during these conditions,there will be no air monitoring/sampling.During the week no air monitoring was able to be implemented.Due to the rain,the soil was dampened sufficiently to prevent any dust from being generated. The contractor has a work force consisting of a supervisor,foreman,equipment operator,two laborers,and a field accountant. Equipment consists of one skid steer,one small and one medium sized excavator. Field activities scheduled for the week of July 11th include completing the scraping and boxing of soil from the Arbors area and off-site shipments. July 27,2005 Update 7/5/2005 During the week of June 27th,field activities continued to concentrate on removing soil from the Arbor's area.All areas delineated for removal have been addressed and post excavation sampling results indicating that further excavation is warranted within four areas.The other areas have been successfully cleaned to below the cleanup goal of 10 parts per million (ppm).From Monday thru Thursday,142 one-cubic yard boxes were filled,bringing the total to date to 403.Also thru Thursday, 13 box trailers delivered their cargo at the landfill in Pennsylvania,bringing the total to twenty.Site operations were concluded at noon of Friday and will resume next Wednesday,July 6th,fallowing the July Fourth holiday. Air monitodng/sampling Is being employed with monitors being placed at locations upwind,downwind,and adjacent to the Arbors.Daily particulate readings are being provided on the website.High humidity and certainly rain will affect the air monitoring equipment so,during these conditions,there will be no air monitoring/sampling. The contractor has a work force consisting of a supervisor,foreman,equipment operator,two laborers,and a field accountant. Equipment consists of one skid steer,and a small and a medium sized excavator. Field activities scheduled for the week of July 4th include completing the scraping and boxing of soil from the Arbors area and off-site shipments. June 24,2005 Update 6/24/2005 During the week of June 20th,field activities continued to concentrate on removing soil from the Arbor's area.All of the twelve the areas delineated for removal have been addressed with post excavation sampling results Indicating that further excavation is warranted at four of the twelve.The other eight areas have been successfully cleaned to below the cleanup goal of 10 parts per million(ppm).From Monday thru Thursday, 157 one-cubic yard boxes were filled,bringing the total to date to 261.Also thru Thursday,seven box trailers delivered their cargo at the landfill in Pennsylvania.A medium sized excavator was delivered and is being used to handle the rocks within the rock pile and to removed tree stumps.The four areas that still exceed the cleanup goal will be re excavated followed by another round post excavation sampling to ensure the cleanup goal of 10 ppm is attained. Air monitoring/sampling is being employed with monitors being placed at locations upwind,downwind,and adjacent to the Arbors.Daily particulate readings are being provided on the website.High humidity and certainly rain will affect the air monitoring equipment so,during these conditions,there will be no air monitoring/sampling. The contractor has a work force consisting of a supervisor,foreman,equipment operator,laborer,and a field accountant. Equipment consists of one skid steer,and a small and a medium sized excavator. Feld activities scheduled for the week include completing the scraping and boxing of soil from the Arbors area and offsite shipments. June 17,2005 Update 6/17/2005 During the week of June 13th,field activities continued to concentrate on removing soil from the Arbor's area.Six of the twelve the areas delineated for removal have been addressed with post excavation sampling results indicating that further excavation is warranted at four of the six.The other two areas have been successfully cleaned to below the cleanup goal of 10 parts per million(ppm).From Monday thru Thursday,47 one-cubic yard boxes were filled and loaded Into box trailers, bringing the total to date to 104.The four box trailers that have been on-site are loaded and are expected to be switched-out on Monday,June 20th.The four areas that still exceed the cleanup goal will be mexcavated followed by another round post excavation sampling to ensure the cleanup goal of 10 ppm is attained.A three-foot by three-foot block basin was discovered two-feet below grade.Pipes are both entering and exiting to/from unknown locations.More important,in and around this basin,is debris consisting of red bricks,chunks of asphalt and beads of mercury.The Village of Rye Brook has no Information regarding this feature and steps were taken to address the mercury and to determine the importance of the basin/pipes. Air monitoring/sampling is being employed with monitors being placed at locations upwind,downwind,and adjacent to the Arbors.Daily particulate readings are being provided on the website.High humidity and certainly rain will affect the air monitoring equipment so,during these conditions,there will be no air monitoring/sampling. The contractor has a work force consisting of a supervisor,foreman,equipment operator,laborer,and a field accountant. Equipment consists of one skid steer,and a small excavator. Feld activities scheduled for the week of June 20th Include the continuation of scraping and boxing soil from the Arbors area and off-site shipments of boxed soil.A large excavator will be delivered to extricate the large tree stumps and to handle rocks in the rock pile. June 10,2005 Update 6/10/2005 During the week of June 6th,field activities concentrated on scraping soil from the Arbors area.Once the soil is scraped,it is directly loaded into a plastic tined one-cubic yard box that is affixed to a wooden pallet.Once filled,the box is closed,sealed with tape,and banded to the pallet prior to being placed into a box trailer.From Tuesday thru Thursday,57 one-cubic yard boxes were filled and loaded Into box trailers.At present,four box trailers are onsfte.Each box trailer will be filled with 20 of the one-cubic yard boxes.Disposal will be at a landfill in Pennsylvania and once approval is obtained,shipments will commence.This approval is expected to be received either Monday or Tuesday of next week.Post excavation sampling was collected from four areas and if the lab results indicate that mercury concentrations are below the cleanup goal of 10 parts per million,clean fill will be used to grade.If the results are greater than the cleanup goal,an additional six4nches of soil will be scraped and another soil sample collected.This procedure will be followed until the cleanup goal is achieved.A larger excavator was delivered as is being used.The mini-excavator was not powerful enough to effectively remove soil from around the larger tree stumps and productivity suffered. Air monitoring/sampling is being employed with monitors being placed at locations upwind,downwind,and adjacent to the Arbors.Daily particulate readings are being provided on the website.High humidity and certainly rain will affect the air monitoring equipment so,during these conditions,there will be no air monitoring/sampling. The contractor has a work force consisting of a supervisor,foreman,equipment operator,laborer,and a field accountant. Equipment consists of one skid steer,mini-excavator and a small excavator. Field activities scheduled for the week Include the continuation of scraping and boxing soil from the Arbors area and off-site shipments of boxed soil. June 03,2005 Update 6/7/2005 During the week of May 30th,field activities resumed on Tuesday.Overburden groundwater samples were collected from piezometers and shallow bedrock groundwater samples were collected from the monitoring wells.Results from this sampling effort will be received at the and of the month.Scraping of soil and loading into lined cubic yard boxes began on Thursday morning.After soli is scraped to a depth of six-inches,samples are collected to confirm that the cleanup level of 10 parts per million is attained.Arrangements are being made for a box trailer to be spotted on-site in which filled boxes can be stored until they are shipped offsite for disposal.The usefulness of using the mini-excavator Inside the small tent/garege while scraping the soil proved Ineffective and time consuming.As a result,the tent/garage will only be used during extrication of contents from the abandoned hand-dug well and former septic tank vaults.Air monitoring/sampling is being employed with monitors being positioned in upwind,downwind,and adjacent to the Arbors locations.Daily particulate readings will be provided on the website as well as all sampling results. I Bids for both vacuum services and transportation and disposal of generated material were received and subcontracts awarded.Clean Harbors will be providing the vacuum services and a post award site meeting was held on Thursday.The start date has been delayed until essential equipment parts can be acquired and effective access points Into the ponds are worked-out. The contractor has a work force consisting of a supervisor,foreman,equipment operator,laborer,and a field accountant. Equipment consists of one skid steer and a mini-excavator. Field activities scheduled for the week include the continuation of scraping and boxing soil from the Arbors area and further delineation sampling of the storm drainage system. May 27,2005 Update 5/27/2005 During the week of May 23rd,tree removal from the Arbors area was completed.A site tour with potential vacuum service bidders occurred on Tuesday.Representatives from four companies were present.A vacuum truck will be utilized in removing sediment from the three ponds and associated underground pipes/stream channel that are associated with the storm drainage system.Bids for this service are due Friday,May 27th.Work is scheduled to start the week of June 6th and be completed by July 1st.Bids also due on Friday are costs associated with the transportation and disposal of mercury contaminated soil.In preparation of transportation and disposal,samples were collected from the drums that are currently staged inside a shed next to the village hall and also from drums on site.The contents Inside the drums In the shed are from the emergency cleanup conducted last year by EPA and the contents inside the drums onsite are from drill cuttings generated during the investigation.Scraping and placement of soil into lined boxes from the Arbors is expected to begin next week,i.e.,week of May 30th.Rather than load boxes of contaminated soil into trucks while parked on Hillandale,wWII have a box trailer parked on the 55 Hillandale Road property.When it is full,it will be exchanged for an empty one.By employing this method, disruptions to traffic on Hillandale will be significantly reduced. The contractor has a work force consisting of a supervisor,foreman,equipment operator,laborer,and a field accountant. Equipment consists of one skid steer,a mini-excavator,and an 85Kw generator. Work activities will resume on Tuesday,May 31st and field activities scheduled for the week include the initiation of scraping and boxing soil from the Arbors area.Also scheduled for the week,is sampling of overburden groundwater from all piezometers. Area/Description of Work 5/24/2005 Areas Where Work is to be Performed There are three areas that will be addressed during the response action: The Arbors Area(the area between the temporary fence and the property boundary fence)-This area includes the paved walkway,rock pile,and trees,four of which will be removed.Trees that are removed will be replaced with appropriately sized trees.The Tennessee Gas Company will be notified prior to the commencement of work within their easement. 55 Hillandale Road-The property at 55 Hillandale Road will be excavated and used as the support zone,which includes a command post trailer,two portable toilets,and a small parking area for vehicles and small pieces of equipment.EPA also will establish areas for staging contaminated soil pending transportation and disposal,clean topsoil,stone,and other materials necessary for restoration.EPA will construct a temporary roadway on the 55 Hillandale Road property along its boundary with 57 Hillandale Road to allow heavy equipment access Into the Arbors area to remove soil there.Once the contaminated soil is excavated and boxed in the Arbors area,it will be transported across the temporary roadway to a staging area on 55 Hillandale Road and loaded onto trucks for off-site disposal.The parcel of property at 55 Hillandale Road is slightly more than one-half acre;EPA's activities,including the areas to be excavated,will occupy the majority of this property. During the assessment at 55 Hillandale Road two subsurface vaults filled with numerous bottles,cylinders,and other laboratory containers(vessels)which are the type of vessels used for transporting and handling elemental mercury,were discovered.These vessels may have contained or may contain mercury.One vault,a former septic tank,is located in the front of the property,the other a former hand-dug well,Is located to the rear of the property.These vaults are sources of mercury contamination and must be removed. Storm drainage system-Surface water accumulates on the Arbors property and then flows into three small ornamental ponds located on residential properties along Hillandale Road.Sediments will be removed from these three ponds along with sediments contained in the piping/stream channel that connects them via a vacuum truck.In an effort to expedite the completion of the project,operations at 55 Hillandale Road and the storm management system will be conducted concurrently. Description of the Work to be Performed The Arbors Area will be addressed first,and then the operations will move onto 55 Hillandale Road.Soil removal will start at the higher elevation on the Arbors Area and work downhill-operations will be conducted in 500 square foot areas(work areas).Initially,the top six Inches of soil in each work area will be scraped and then scanned with a Lumex RA-915 mercury analyzer(an Instrument that is capable of measuring mercury concentration in real time).If the remaining soil in each work area contains 10 parts per million(ppm)or less(cleanup level),no more soil will be removed from that work area.Samples will be collected for laboratory analysis and confirmation that the soil contains 10 ppm(or less).If the 10 ppm cleanup level is not attained,the next six inches will be scraped and scanned with the Lumex.This process will be repeated in six inch Intervals until the desired 10 ppm cleanup level Is attained.Once the cleanup level is attained,topsoil will be spread on the area and sod or grass seed will be placed over excavated areas. As soil is excavated,it will be directly packaged into double-lined cubic yard boxes,sealed,staged and covered pending load- out for transportation to an off-site disposal facility.When a specified number of boxes have been staged,trucks will be loaded in front of 55 Hillandale Road. During all soil removal operations,an air monftoring/sampling plan will be implemented.Monitors will be positioned both upwind and downwind of the work area.Results of the air monitoring/sampling periodically will be presented on this EPA webpage(under'documents"). Work at 55 Hillandale Road will require the removal/excavation of the two subsurface vaults and the excavation of contaminated soil.The safest and most expedient method of removal/excavation of the two subsurface vaults and the contaminated soils that surround them requires demolition and removal of the residence.In its present location,the residence would obstruct the excavation and transfer of contaminated soil from the staging area to the load-out area on the street.EPA also Is concerned about the ability of the residence to emerge unscathed from the excavation to be conducted directly adjacent to it.The residence was constructed In 1927 and has a brick facia with crumbling mortar,as well as a poured concrete basement with sections of poor structural quality.Excavation adjacent to its foundation could cause structural problems,as well as concern that vibrations from heavy equipment may cause immediate damage to Its structure,and damage in the future as the residence resettles Into the restored foundation and undertying soil.EPA also plans to use the residence's foundation(after it is demolished)to collect contaminated groundwater that will be pumped through a temporary portable treatment system and discharged into the sanitary sewer main.While work is being conducted on the property,the residents will be temporarily relocated because we plan to use heavy construction equipment on the property and we need to keep the residents away from the heavy equipment and excavation areas.Before the residence is demolished,the owners will be compensated. Prior to soil excavation and during site preparation activities ground water samples from all piezometers(micro-wells)will be collected.This sampling will be repeated upon completion of the field activities. Workers will don personal protective equipment,i.e.,white or yellow suits,yellow rubber booties,latex gloves,hard hats,and during the first week full-face respirators.Following established health and safety protocols,during the first week,workers also will have personal air pumps affixed to them that will sample the air during their activities.It Is expected that the results from these air samples will indicate that no dust Is being generated and respirator usage will not be required after the first week.The work areas have been observed to be very wet which will help to suppress any dust generation.If a dry spell is encountered and these areas become drier,a water hose will be available to wet down the work area. The Site's hours of operation will be 7:00 a.m.-5:30 p.m.(Equipment or noisy operations will commence at 8:00 am).The On-Scene Coordinator will be available to address any concerns that the residents may have. Trucks with dump trailers and/or roll-offs are expected to be utilized during the demolition of 55 Hillandale Road as well as during the subsequent removal of contaminated soils.During this time,it may be necessary to have flagmen or temporary road closures.Residents on Hillandale Road will be provided ample notification via mailings and frequent updates on this webpage.EPA has been and will continue to coordinate with the Village of Rye Brook on present and future matters pertaining to this removal action. May 20,2005 Update 5/20/2005 During the week of May 16th,the temporary roadway was extended into the Arbors area from 55 Hillandale Road.Geotextile fabric was first laid down and then crushed stone was spread and compacted to form a firth base.In addition to the temporary roadway,a similar construction method was used to establish an area on which an office trailer is spotted.An office trailer was delivered and setup on Monday.Utility connections are being completed and the office trailer should be fully operational next Tuesday.Electricity will be provided thru a generator.Tree removal from the Arbors area began on Wednesday and should be completed during the early part of next week,May 23rd or May 24th.At present,the cleanup contractor has a work force consisting of a supervisor,foreman,equipment operator,laborer,and a field accountant.Equipment consists of one skid steer,small dozer,compactor,and a mini-excavator. Work activities scheduled for next week include the completion of the tree removal and completion of the support zone setup. web sites I reoional web sites I profile I bu0stins I images I documents I POLREPs I contacts I Inks PLANrIat L � L Nt N K6 y a._my fWMF oR WALL SCONCE cpm m.aa re�v`ape�Raa�wa 9b'o a. i e88 • CessceneEansis p " 6=T1 r BBB 8 Thssbabus While P're t0'-t2' J B8B xua pcckenlelis Green Gian(' reen Gant Abwuam T-' B&B "? t LAMP �- axea '�. +0'-+2 BBB NnEF LI HrS WILL M*TANDARP M"ONTIAL xx,mn.x.,,. ommon x.m. sn, ,,,� g•„ ERr1Y EFFICIENT LILTFfTINLI WITH ChlNa alnAdie'F✓6 SpiceeNm R S ice g I ¢LATERA TO LARC ATE SkY-LIyNTiH� as eoxwppa 5� �H, aba NrWtls Promise WX hazN'Ampas Prcmbe' zl 47 �;` ��{ mamel'e etldwbta'QuidSxe' pu�he H m a 5 6 ,'J/4 - rrasarve'(�ine Gil Gi�HPI 10 aa1 2 V Ie+rerlkiNeta S aM1k Winlerbe a ikkbe g RhstloEeMrm maximus Rpsebay Rhotlotlentlrpn EXTuloK WALL S.-_of.F xemx6m 3e5.. WItMAzEL AMoLpS ryzcMNiE 4t 74L - ..r - I ZEL ARJOLCg ?Mor—JI t7 AL aWmay Am Umfilix/errvdneLetl Fam gg LA EIZN 14°-elbT5e Bane care. i gai� 4XF2RD LAMP.4 POST 'I 31Ne 3Go-Ix` eG'7a WALPOLE W/ODWORKRYCS rI--1 ZULi` 2U2 ZUL —_F 2o2 • _ N` � � ; '� I�I�rrArsT � �• \ 1 •\ \ \ I H is N KL e — ��•\ N` 1 • 1 \�/ / EnxwroV LGBe�\4 _ GL 6251 �� M 4 •fc�REaIH L"plW'FVI � � p — � _ ai � 1 1 11 •I � 1 I �I 3 + I ea=,o' • 1 I , J J • � ,, 1 1 CA -•Im ukwax 1% �pTI� 11 I I 11av7 J 1 LAD N5 Zot4"Po15 \\ / I 1 1• I •_! - •� _ oo/f • ' • • • - / 11 �? 1 'ui -zoo LL6(NX/•' �� _ ; °r� 7 v, � N F — es' :oto Pols wITcI1AzELARNOLDSfltoNKE e7 AL' 4NIrt - w L 4e�-s' 4&VQAL. DANIEL S H E RM A N LANDSCAPE&MITIGATIONLIGHTING Au RIGHT5 RESERVED REPRODUCTION COPY oR OF THIS f PLANTING PLAN / PLAN PIAN OR ANY PORTION,THEREOF 15 PROHIBITED WITHOUT BDenchmark LM Management Services LLC 6EDGEW00D DRIVE N5CAPE ARCHITECT. P.C. AN�q THE WAnTEN PERM15510N OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITEQ 951 E.Boston Poet Road RYE BROOK NY - 4 a'—d.ay.5a,,9 DRAWN BY:DR DATE:10/3/14 REV:'"• 5 n°r ALTERATION OF TH15 DRAWING,EXCEPT IF DONE BY OR Mamaroneck NY 10543 valhaua,NY 10595 .cx FHT UNDER THE DIRECTION OF THE LICENSED L.A.THAT T:914-824-0999 .pI.AnT DIST PREPARED THEM,15 A VIOLATION OF NYS EDUCATION IAW. P:9I4-824-0251 SOP1E:1--101-01 SHEET:L- ZONING COMPLIANCE CHART R-25 ZONE DISTRICT "I_IE HIT. LOTGOVERAGES A I I N IN 1.NL INIDTIHFHFI� ITT H11111-1 11AI.T FIINIIII—TIFLITRI EEFF.LOT A �,I'P FE" FRO"T E­ FEII G=­E 11TH111111 IN _ `PE= 'N=IT 'AGE REEDIDEP NE-T A=G w 21 FERAF —.1E I ED II I, GCIEPGGE I, CO, 2: 0 A lEl 1-11 11- 111 2D 31". U-1 HI'N`Il"TEN�" _76 llolosll IIIFIA ­A 111 2­1 LZR R11 GRAIll ILFIR IR A 1111,1121 IH­21 INII 1.1 IIIGGII 11112.11 A 'A 111111E..THE AlElAlE FIINT IIAI IET""'F 12,1 111 IEEI IIIITEI 11 T TIE ZII ING IF APIEAFI, I RTAH" I_ E 111,E . I ,"GHT, IN I D 1111111TI- T'T IR 11NIT111TIN END 11E lEAN IE IEL NDH I .I. 40 TI F 1,1FE"'E NE'PT1 I EIEGIN,�_HDLEIIELDIIG TPAPANlTlID—.ElllEEIITFET.1 1111IN—TH1.1 !'o IF THE HIHEII RIIIE lElA ANN TH E P H N H I__ A, Re 10 F, ...... Ai A, fi 12 2 A--! 2 GAR 205.0 LOCATION AtAP El—E 211 EIIIIIIIINT11-111 AD sE 21 DQ HIGH- A LOT128 FAT =% �,H T=�L" CL..L 140 TRLTL��,T�IRTIF��lE��ll�TRIIT�I 4, 9 IF I 1 1 FAN E Is ILL11-11 HILILL�"��LLIL�T'��L'�LIL'�"I FLTLlTNNL�'LA=NLllLl�PT_l T ­Fo o'Dl N IPILT�E NH`Tl�'�D'l ­LE H PROFILE \ P, HIAI A.F. 'EA, FIR� -4 7 TEMPORARY T11111L --------- 1111TRY I.NT.1 k&,R4 lEl"llE YE-1­11I HIG" N ALT G "IN N IT YARD/ I'I F.. 111 NT N I?,HNHI0LLL IT`RLUI��T EIN�6�IN, L H INT HE AP E/ I A NT�A­,E'DUE R�E A IM t x- IRIPIAED A Xx GAI-11.0 A ITT FENCE EypleRl) HI IN IOSED GO 2 NI 1-1 IHT.1 RETAI, CUDIOF1 I R F G DRAIN tt =t N G%LTE'� nrrl AC CULTED 150 XFHD) AI 'T D J G, E, v E D C EEff 0 0 D D)?_T I p wRN'G"'T L P­PED A ePE IIED I-T,4, -11uP!jtON PLAN EXISTING CON ­C­T INFIC SIALE T.-_= GRAPHIC SCALE D' � A A TELE.111221IIII T� I(.0 IDIPT �O :2.N —D 1;I1,71 TG.IIIIENTG INH E R E D G E''W 0 0 ,0 IT R_ VE,lks o, NH I' MR'ElIT'l.� NH IAly 51Dll EGTE. _I', -D'I­E: I DESIDITIDIN ­11 1111TINI A 111Y, EP AN ­oq- -LkIR00K," 7 CALL BEFORE YOU DIG 1 RM 962 7962 8 E D'LLC DEAN PLAN E ET THE Tll GRAPHIC SCALE 11—CE01 III IR001­­­CGINTY III SITE BIB!�ASSOCIATES' MS'LLP III R �l TETIE DIG .SP-1F IEL.Ill 117 5111 Tree Preservation and Protection Plan Tree Preservation and Protection Plan m P Diameter Remove Diameter Remove • ��+ AH Tree Hea1tA of iree HealtF o� Tree at Breast Sp..... or Tr 35 f/at Beost MAPLE FAR PRITE HeightTee protect Height Spec iree protect w ,� VIII PD.TFIT Faa PRITE�T �, ae M1APLE .., No: az 1a. 1-1 a000 0 V - o-, LE -- ,a,�.a T T a000 E 1,11 DD.TEFT PaoTECT ia� nE a^L.._ - _.eo,— ,a.a�ro�e e FAa .oT .­F ,y tercN �}'e, � vx.rvosw r v�aux � NpryOR +23-gb, CTis -azo�. aAoaoszo iv mr.o�A M. O { O'� b Q 1 LOCATION MAP / , R — ­lnT � a i � 11 1 11, G000 PIITEIT FAR T111 11IT11­1 Ill eN TR T ELEVATION CRIBBING-EXISTING TREE PROTECTION �.:.j Cess P D L E.IV 0 O D D 1?71�E _ _ -T irAFv .ems»ee �.k ,oxE,>L enT,�To�eE� ° slrEoarlFPAaI a,aoaso°F ao1­111T­ . z0WN PCLnANT:EL aEI._11E1,1uELl I.. a�A�L.Eoa�EOTITaE�T�sE11 cr,'uA�o TRE EM EXISTING CONDITION PLAN 1.11011 E ��..w,���T��mE ITI-111a �HTKL 1,IIII.F.I.DHEITOF Ill GRAPHIC SCALE onTacT INEo. a NoauavEvoa,LLc EFILEFINIHE nioTEweeazi,111ASMAPNUMBER211 a TREE PRESERVATION AND PROTECTION PLAN - GALL BEFORE YOU DIG,AoaJ627962 * X� 8EDGER'OOD,LLC IND U -F I 11-1011YI IR001—II—COUNTY Ill IH RIBBO ASSOCIATES,LLP zoFK TPPP ............ qEG� qEG GRAD A 1AElE. -11, R 3 S,TE', gAGG. 1111IN'GIN 1011 L --------------- RING CASINET TYPICAL AT JOINT. ILI 1111 I'll,ILI" = "INE 1 11111CIN AREA 11 OTgr G1111 1I 1G.IN PER I IN.11. P....T"N..TE AN"I"' NEIIIA.E 1,1A..LC TO-EL 'N NEC,Mssr -IDES, NN AS 111111-0- E-TITX%�. REoUREE. E11UR NPITRNININ. .R.uT TYPICAL WATER SERVICE CONNECTIONxE"x MIN. PR0IN EC IN S& I'll IPE111111 111ILEI I PIPE 01 1�1 IS P PER PESITI I PLIET(S 11 mars S SI"S I' "T................TO 'T..... DRAINAGE MANHOLE Rl�.—Ll'L'11'TH' TYPICAL SEWER SERVICE CONNECTION �IEOLI..1,LT I�E ,T L "I '71SIGN REQUIRED TCAFF A I D`1G HS-2D-44 LOADING INETR 'T CULTEC RECHARGER 150XLHD G� WATER SERVICE INSTALLATION DETAIL MIN E-TNI IlTl111L, ='ElT.Alll. ALI' P� T NE DRAINAGE PIPE INSTALLATION xis Z'Lo ry esx rx xLsro_saE IGE IT—1x lLED TYPICAL SEWER LATERAL INSTALLATION x� TH1111—NNT-1 THIN 1�1 1,NN— 1-1 GFINT11�1�1111 El E.PE PPEE III P RAIL GI L A L�LAIL E I'll IT �G,URFICE VITEN ALL NUPF l-TE I F lNI 11EITE1 NCINT L ILIT eegenwea NLT F 'E 1' GRATE DETAIL 1-11M IE,1E I PERN ITINIANIII—El 11ANTENINI—ILLIE PRID-D j L1 111N1 T STABILIZED CONS I RUCTION ENINCE DEF— NM5GlE"—siTFwE I-1—T1 moron I 1 1-11NUIL E Ti q REASON qVN 111 5 —N 1,11 IENTI NH 1H I III GITAL UTE' MNEIITI.� PLAN VIEW _ NKI 1ITE: I EEI-ITIIN 'N'l._L SECTION VIEW SOIL STOCKPILE DETAIL GROIT11 AT 'UN, NEN DETAILS N, TO GSIN YARD DP-UN DETAIL 8 EDGEMNOOD,ELL RISID11-11 INIII IS—11ACT111I N1­111ECTICUT IRECIAT TIPICA L DRIVEINA1 �jEE,`GE1`0-11D1R1ROO1—CI—COUNT1 III C"N a BIBBO ASSOCIATES,LLP AI E.UIE 111�IU TE.1 C DNG ` N, D-1 IEL.—1115—