Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2015-04-09 - Planning Board Meeting Documents
V FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. PLANNING,TRANSPORTATION, ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT RYE, NEW YORK FAIRFIELD,CONNECTICUT DAVID H. STOLMAN MEMORANDUM AICP,PP PRESIDENT MICHAEL A. GALANTE To: Village of Rye Brook Planning Board EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT Date: March 31, 2015 35o THEO.FREMDAVE. RYE, NEW YORK 10580 914 967-6540 Subject: Traffic Study for Sun Homes at Reckson Executive Park, FAX: 914 967-6615 Village of Rye Brook, New York — Review of Traffic CONNECTICUT Impact Study (#538.662) 203 255-3100 HUDSON VALLEY As requested, we have completed a review of the Traffic Access and Impact 845 297-6056 Study prepared by Maser Consulting P.A., dated January 14, 2015. The LONG ISLAND proposed Sun Homes at Reckson Executive Park will be located in the 5i6 364-4544 western portion of the Reckson Executive Park located on the west side of www.fpdark.cOm King Street and north of Anderson Hill Road. The proposal is to extend email@fpciarlc.com International Drive to serve this residential development. Project Description There is a previous approval for the Reckson Executive Park (R.E.P.) Phase III comprising 280,000 square feet of office space. The current proposal is to instead construct a mix of single-family homes and attached homes totaling 110 units, with 10 units set aside to be affordable. The traffic analysis is based on 2014 existing traffic conditions, 2019 future no-build and 2019 build traffic conditions. The Applicant has provided both an analysis for build conditions with the approved 280,000 square feet of office space and build conditions with the 110 residential units. Traffic Comments Based on the review of the Traffic Report and Site Plan, the following comments are provided: 1. 2014 Existing Conditions — As noted in the previous Traffic Study for the Reckson Sports Amenity project, comparing the existing site traffic generation obtained from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) in "Trip Generation" 9t" Edition, 2012, rates FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. PLANNING,TRANSPORTATION, ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT RYE, NEW YORK FAIRFIELD,CONNECTICUT indicate that currently the site is generating significantly less traffic than expected. The existing development, according to the Applicant, currently has a total of 540,000 square feet of office space, with 154,000 square feet of the space vacant. From the turning movement counts, the existing buildings on the site are generating a total of 171 and 226 vehicle trip ends during the weekday morning and weekday afternoon peak hours, respectively. However, based on ITE rates and using the fitted curve equation for the weekday morning and weekday afternoon peak hours, a site with 386,000 square feet of occupied office space could generate a total of 564 and 511 vehicle trip ends during the peak hours noted above. The Applicant should therefore follow the same methodologies used in the Reckson Sports Amenity Traffic Study to account for this condition. Also see comment number 3 below. 2. Accident Experience — The Applicant should provide the latest three years of available accident data from either New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT), Connecticut Department of Transportation (ConnDOT) and/or the Rye Brook/Greenwich Police Departments and summarized in a tabular format. 3. No-Build Conditions — An annual growth rate of two percent was utilized and is acceptable to expand the baseline volumes. The 154,000 square feet of vacant office space was included in the other developments section. As mentioned in comment number 1, the same methodologies that were used to account for both the vacant space and the significant difference between the traffic counts and ITE rates for the occupied office space should be followed. It was mentioned in the Traffic Study that the Brunswick School Expansion and Kingswood Residential Development are included in the growth rate. However, in the previous study for Reckson Sports Amenity, the Brunswick School Expansion traffic was included as another development and; therefore, the same methodology should be followed. We believe that Kingswood should also be added as another development. The Applicant has not accounted for the temporary closure of PepsiCo Corporate Park. This traffic should be added to the other development section and account for the proposed full master plan, which indicates a population of 2,400 employees. Also, there was no mention of the proposed Trinity Church on Anderson Hill Road. This will generate very little traffic during the peak hours analyzed and we believe would be included in the growth rate used. 2 FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. PLANNING,TRANSPORTATION, ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT RYE, NEW YORK FAIRFIELD,CONNECTICUT There is a proposal, but no formal application, at SUNY Purchase for approximately 385 unit senior housing development. As there is no formal application into the Village/Town of Harrison, the exclusion is acceptable. Also, on the SUNY Campus there has been a reference to adding more dormitories. Again, there is no formal application; however, we believe that the addition of dormitories may add minimal new traffic and would be accounted for in the growth rate. Lastly, there is a proposal for a new parking garage at Westchester County Airport. This project will not add a significant amount of traffic to the Study Area and we believe it is accounted for in the growth rate. The missing other developments and the use of the same methodologies used in the Reckson Sports Amenity Study should be added and the no-build volumes be revised. 4. Site Traffic Generation — The Applicant used the ITE trip rates to calculate the remaining approved 280,000 square feet of office space vehicle trip ends and is acceptable. It is our opinion that it should be calculated using the fitted curve equation for 820,000 square feet and for 540,000 square feet and the difference between the two would be the site traffic generation for the approved 280,000 square feet of office space. For the proposed residential development, the Applicant has used the ITE rates for single-family homes to calculate the estimated site traffic generation. A review of the site plan indicates that this development consists of 25 single-family homes and 85 attached homes. Using ITE rates for both single-family homes and condominium/townhouse type buildings, we developed the following comparison Table: VEHICLE TRIP ENDS TRAFFIC Weekday Weekday SOURCE DIRECTION Morning Afternoon From Traffic Study Enter 22 From Traffic Study Exit 65 Total 87 From ITE Using Single- Enter 13 From ITE Using Family and Exit 51 Single-Family and Condominium/Townhouse Total 64 Condominium/ Townhouse 3 FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. PLANNING,TRANSPORTATION, ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT RYE, NEW YORK FAIRFIELD,CONNECTICUT The site traffic volumes used in the Traffic Study and analysis are higher and should be considered conservative. 5. Site Traffic Distribution and Assignment — The Applicant provided a site traffic distribution and assignment for both office and residential developments and is acceptable. 6. Build Traffic Volumes — Build volumes should be revised, as needed. Refer to comments 1 and 3. 7. Traffic Impact Analysis — We have reviewed the Synchro Files submitted for existing conditions and the proper timing inputs were used. The peak hour factors used for both the weekday morning and weekday afternoon peak hours for both intersections should match the field data. A vehicle queue/storage analysis should be provide for all signalized intersections. Site Plan Review A review of the Site Plan, identified as the Illustrative Plan, and prepared by Divney Tung Schwalbe indicates the residential development will be located to the west of the existing Office Park. It will have access via an extension of International Drive, provide an internal roadway circulation plan providing access to each of the proposed units. A secondary access is shown on the plan near the northerly boundary and providing access to the northwest corner of a large parking area currently serving the Office Complex. The Applicant should indicate if this will be emergency access only or provide for full movements at all times. The plan shows two dead-end roadways serving several units. However, these dead-end roadways do not include any turnaround area for residents and guests, as well as emergency vehicles and; therefore, should be investigated to determine options of eliminating these dead-end aisles. The main spine of International Drive, as an extension into the residential development indicates perpendicular parking on this roadway. It is recommended that since this will serve the entire residential area that these parking spaces be relocated so that motorists are not backing in and out of these parking spaces along this particular roadway. 4 FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. PLANNING,TRANSPORTATION, ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT RYE, NEW YORK FAIRFIELD,CONNECTICUT The Applicant may consider a roundabout concept for the southerly terminus of this International Drive access road into the residential development at its location to the most southerly homes to be located in a plaza-type layout. As part of the overall development of the site, visitor parking should be identified to serve the entire development. The Applicant should indicate if the driveway aprons are intended for residents and guests and how these driveways will serve each home. Findings Based on the comments generated by our review of the Traffic Report, the Applicant should provide responses to each of the comments. When all the requested information is provided a second review will be conducted. Michael A. Galante Executive Vice President Steven T. Cipolla Associate/Transportation G:A538.662 Sun Homes at Reckson Executive Park\Word\traffic review 3-2015.doe:td 3/23/15 5 BOWMAN PLAZA MIXED USE RESIDENTIAL / RETAIL rLo FEDERICO 80 BOWMAN AVENUE AssoclATEs VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK WESTCHESTER COUNTY ° BOWRIDGE NEW YORK RELLT Y PARCEL DATA P e 6GANf TIA NN..Y."Tc8/o ZONINGUI PIIC C-I D IGiI5CF.1100c`7 IlIL VILLAGE OF�YF a000K TAX MM GSI�N�TION- 5LCTIO� P 4 P 2.GLGC<I. OTS 26,3 P F 32 BOWMAN L AC�Rf-f —0.50-RK 9 Y P,887.065: OWNER/APPLICANT PLAZA �54 1-l-fLLc- s5eu6EllI Nllll l PIFAS.aNTVILE NEW 1T:nK 10570 BARRM N. ftYE ft00K,N.Y. CE COVER SHEET \\���\�.� § �P'w•rr �� ® ® �® N9�OF NE'ft�t SIGN SIGN e21 LOCATION MAP N.T6 2 BOWMAN AVENUE ELEVATION 1 N.T3 OF 10 J � m U o p� m O U RE U a U 0 3° FEDERICO u TD BANK y a ASSOCIATES C L, Z W I I y N/F U � �. a a a AI TD BANK z O ti I 4 ZONE -1 BREALYE N/F j Filed Map Lot 5 NE LLC S. 0. H. ASSOCIATES m3 �E $ Filed Map Lot 2 CLEANERS T6 a Edge a/As nan ' �1 �o N° �w 80.10' ror. voti�1-1��P N09°0530W m 7saANTV N.Y. t4"MA PIEA6AMfV0.LE,N.V.10.570 26'MAPL00Ck0deF— 4�0�� °5720"W r w --- 20'M PL MAP ——_ B'MAPLE'�E �.JS h/ w N09"O5 30 4 .03' -- —95—— — _ — s � A �`d 12' JPLE o O �n — ———— REE © 12•MAPLE APLE-9, v DEE C W z z BOWMAN l G $I� it 1m iVa � a., V/ 11 TW TREE 8•MAPLE X96-_ ��� 3 �� PLAZA Nei �ioo - 3111 eevuo Ii is nR, o N, i �� a \ to,MAPLE o U z �� �orye •�cdt-� O-1� 8 ° a ��� a oEq ia•MdpLL m o ( $ a �x 94 �x m J"MAP a 1 - U' - �_�IP� $ aOy 8e a A x \ oA A � oII �R �� � . � e•oWTREua�� �a\g o g \ ooh A c S i ��z 1 b o m ab A o = e MAPLE 3 U 3' 4:7 a"'aEenoo°�CE EIb+ �z / I 1 0 02 m o 0 1 4WMim SOIL U \z I rouo rtR RRA — H3 ez zA�-� X or 20°Ash O�Iiil 111 N :J F- �� ,.4�i as cb y o o / 882 rPtP� fi y 1 L; 1 ih -TTP^ j7.99' iiti PANTON Joo, m o P,' =n :� U�' r�IIIRTT a� m1 Fz C-1 A� C-1 a / �� 1 q L1 �v 1 is•TwAsn �' x ————— U F ZONE, ZONE aui� �O� dDW pa id �Y` \ 1 PL +�101 l..l_ tz`o '�a� �y o li 2 o a I ',X / �'O "E'v Tp o � ��� EXISTING N v —= �7 CONDITIONS lluui �° w° � j�� 1 c, € - aNy��i� i °0 X o \9 /\ m i aE1> C� r: "o•� O 1 v m t. C, :�a 101 r C:U of r" �2t oV V � �-� �� m V A I o°L ab v1 Bf, ,y �� hti Q w m N m o * V w V'iEliiY'z � T�.wC: sses`o w`3' x x \ 1cssx) in W cc1 a^oIlm'I �` yodP-orn s / o� uT 13.35'r,� � urooN, Oha } �as�OAK I �98� -,X o Q -G-amu OrT I`_-- I I D $ U m�rnn F-� Y� X mX N o N Oo£ U3 m N o / m iO s �ii� LT aEo+x ^,-�bm is O m ro / L4" RIMAPE oEc N mfr m z� .' i'^ uy'3�a��1m'I 1 °` ✓ ��` Ic �a 6a6 _ \ 9 X� \ f"°s d a o� 11 �x 1 a AI_ �SoJ)DiMAPL x 1 a, I w� OF Nf�a 909 Mbg� 901 11 .60N( BOO Ob y�0£�Oo6 _ 0 1 X99 Sb I m �77770 6• TREE a, A ia"MARL 1 b A —S6—.. N1 �9 �9j 3 —- T, \ 14" E ccx-�>�l "� Bnup �Gi�n3�lTR c'-I ¢ 6� PX rol 69C6 c'o 6��Qi JloydsV �' -- m a m �a esro5 jpydsylo eap3 Catch eosin 9528 Asphalt Cwb Asphalt Curb �� M a _ m I'� R1M=94.70 N e = j auanod llo4dsV ° .� m .'' Inv.Out=90.65 p°K �, f 3 g BARBER PLACE ���_` °'°�-- BARBER PLACE �g Urccc - j3A7 O �_ - llaydsyjoa6p3 _ �• Asphdt Curb PLAN 2 c: 7HI LY U.A'I,1 I\TUM RU) 11RID BYlII()Ml VIFRRITTS I,S.D4ED AP RI 1.11.2010. ZONING DATA L 07 rL 3 m FEDERICO TD BANK a ASSOCIATES iw Feer. - ooF sFr Semi Flaeaacos / � � L �-�.�o�L��c� O a aae o o e as K rnuea wrnianns arve aeauaeren.s ` BOWRIDGE ova Rea�o e.P�nnm eoA� _ f T REALTY LLC 7 MWCEI WNRT PIEA6ANTVR,IE N.Y.IOB70 �zm 0 0 �.. _mac � : •: .. BOWMAN PLAZA 0 aRBAMEH CE g1 PROPOSED MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL/TAIL WITH PARKING BELOW ^ DIVISION RERET PRELIMINARY >,; m SITE aPLAN &ZONING TABLE z 3 �m a a BARBER PLACE ONE WAY PLANSCALE 1'40 3 (((��� OF 10 d ZONING DATA I ZONING—7-7 R-1 EN71AL R-AIL uses 11 b� FEDERICO TD BANK a ASSOCIATES N BOWRIDGE 44 REALTY 1 LLC ",.-.......... 7 SPHUCE ML COURT PLEA6AYnTIAN.Y.100 14 CURB. ------ BOWMAN 2 '1 PLAZA 10 L8 III 1 2 3 F4 5 6 7 8 9 10 HROOV,N.Y. ,�.-24,0—J9.5. B1110ING M UN—D Z PROPOSED 3 STORY MIXED USE MULTI-FAMTLY RESIDENTIAL DIVISION RETAIL WITH PARKING BELOW STREET PRELIMINARY 5 5 BELGLAN OLOCrCURS, SITE Lu ql—t7YMCAL) LAYOUTPLAN 46 &ZONING 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 I TABLE � 6 3 9- 13 offi. 7 0 ------ 'I I IL----- L----- ------ EXIT -9 LI m F7, - 0 - --------------L------------------ -- lkll)� hJ OVA -------------------- ---------------------------- ------------------ ------------------------------------------ ---------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------- BARBERPLACE ONE WAY 5 4 3 1ECxUPCS71.' 2 71 1 �y 1 N PLAN , "T'LlIl SCALE:1'-19 1 .71 F 10 LEGEND -•-•-•-•-•-•-PROPERTY LINE WATER SERVICE s� SEWER CONNECTION PROPOSED SEWER MAIN 0 STORM DRAINAGE m Wi CATCH BASIN ` loAaae=vo FEDERICO SEE DETAIL SHEETS 9 OF 10 m GQ17 JBIDM • MANHOLE TD BANK a ASSOCIATES SEE DETAIL SHEETS 9 OF 10 a TROUGH DRAIN i s SEE DETAIL SHEETS 9 OF 10 LIGHT POLE 5EE DETAIL SHEETS 8 OF 10 INSPECTION PORT .SEE DETAIL SHEET 8 OF 10 BOWRIDGE W REALTY LLC C M BEET EAANTOLEN.P.105 7E 94.10 -Xm.zo 4 1 x _ 9638. rs- I l0 94.91 T1 ,I0 93.68 -- 494- a ,,.., BOWMAN x93.61 z PLAZA Fno�j o�un°,l svc a v 1 0�0 9AMEHP CE 94.12 ���� my m ea a_ 3 li 1 0 0.YE BROOK,N.Y. f�noAll n e ze FBF.-a uoc�a�aoa 2ENGH DavIN Inv.00U�9S3] - - 1 \\ IF �r-„ oaPAR1Noo'N9.U�nI E9o 3 1I P moo,H1I E II1 �IsivOT 025 PROPOSED 3 STORY MIXED USE ,TI ITII IP T,II�wIPE�T d1R I� MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL/ F1'lU 7. a= � 1'1 'Ile Vl I SION OUT 86.24 1 1 RETAIL WITH PARKING BELOW «wu - -_T �_ =01 TREET PRELIMINARY TT� lays ��� 1 UTILITY 1�1O1 HDaE 'A BSMi.92.0io,jjs to 1 1 a'E'�. Inv 1n aai z1 IIUII `o'iPs m i ' PLAN I I I suo szso II I I I � � � p U 1 i - I - rn a x w. 1 on Inv.In�a 3 .9z� ,gym �Nv.o�96.» paAIN 1'1 I - 13 1 0 . 3X27 FL IF I IF I IP I Ir_ I I P IN V.OBIT 96 RO RIM,98.]b o ' Eo u EXIT O - s w I I I I 1 oho v.IN"I a aEN�H paAl � 1nv 1 866 9 94 0 0 1 2 e aAno Dow alw 9e.so 37150 vaOP.2x4 oaAln m x our el a sso aUn Inter ss .9e�4 1 ,t z1n.9z oQ ur 9so�o�x�®� o INV.OUT 90.59 m X '1 e Sas=,.._-___ �oEn eo -°---- w�nEn ROAov 1 3 93.89 � 3 Ezistg 10 « Ex st9 8 Water MpnWNe �,I• 5 0NIf�7rA8�7, Mpny� �� JI ClayseneF �� VEi9 C1av BA ER PLACE vV� VV II YY YY 1111 VV w�n�oAp l7IIII — �; F.: d_ Fa a Sewer ,�O/�1�•� J woen aoap x.aErlovE ' t o �I•• 99.28 H BUJ & I.... ..,. ExIS7 N 15"cna. P2o EZIsr.SnH vROv.CB ExI5rIn0 eSauaLT CUR FaOVIpE te"Sung RIM. 1,,95.60 F1n.95.89 IN17 CONCRETE 1 b m_11 55 37 Oust I6"CMP INI e"I r im.OUT e+e+ 191 zs Dee7" lon ro nn�cNT _ ' �� --- • 9 ExsmNG. N. �� - PLAN SONIgrooee CO/Chb02'M n 5 oI F RIM h101.9T Aft-94.71 ce of Inv.In=89.86 SCALE:1'44 vl�ue ��— Inv.but--84.81 OF 10 d 16EGENE:) TREE PROTECTION NOTES: Ave a Grade Calculationaims ano -------PROPERTY LINE ra�urr�n,vrzecmmazr scAoms vneums a._ EXISTING CONTOUR praNneg 7.1.17 Wrlecorvsrvucnonancclns�or vee vav✓KIN,,erc... NNSTLD1 C DF 4NY �1 PROPOSED CONTOUR V. 925➢ 200 9250 I.. 1,3 80 vewcLe 1.1-3novenenr cF woRaers oz Ma.M 1 oz w EN3 of conswcnon Peeves U"N"Z� 95.50 9600 200 95]5 I.. 1,3050] EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN 96.00 97.00 200 96.50 28.63 2,76280 rHe owv cores or ou Toe Teees "aLL se InsTaLLe°'mans oR sneweRs sHaLL ss PLaceP ours 97.0 99.00 2.00 90.00 d3.51 d 266.92 1 10050 101.50 2.00 101.00 16.0 1,818,00 e SEE GENER,4L CONSTRUCTION ("may 101.50 101.50 200 101.50 48.67 4 940.01 conareucnon on s7 nr r"e seamnma of wnsrzucnon ano zennm in vcnce Foz ncc P"Hees of 1„'j EXISTING TREE TO BE PROTECTED 101. 101.25 2.00 101.30 6.00 608.25 \\ �E�'UENC��G NOTE ON SHFFT 'o' 50 SEE DETAIL SHEET 8 OF 10 10135 101.75 2.00 101.50 6.00 609.00 consrRucTion veeioo He Taee vaorecran neaswes enact ae nonirorzeP nrvP nnmramev rHaouGno�r Tne 3D.2 101,75 101.75 2.00 101.75 6.00 3.073.87 reae,Puen�s rHe ceow�nc mason,Foe ar EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED 101.]5 101.50 2.00 101.83 8.00 BOg75 101.50 101.50 2.00 101.50 6.00 609.00 eosr3 Qown asonsoFreQcoMPeronoFconsrQcT_ FEDERICO SILT FENCE 99.00 91.50 2.00 98.75 81.80 5,988.89 SEE DETAIL SHEET 10 OF 10 9950 82.50 2.00 93.50 22.00 2057.00 acTviTies sHacc ee inneoiaTecr eevcaceo To TH saTisracTnn or rue rcunGmac.rtr. 'cceP ar consT¢ucrion ASSOCIATES SSOC I^TES L_J CATCH EASIN AND INLET PROTECTION 91.76 81.75 2.0 97.75 27.00 1920.75 = t1 1. t1 „ SEE DETAIL SHEET 10 OF 10 1 9250 1 9250 1 2.00 9250 12,TddAB a-c 4 STAEIIILED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE SEE DETAIL SHEET 10 OF 40 356.19 I 31701.56 tel Fbar Average .61 EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION Ele 50 Gratle ,93 101.50 9]42 - 1.08 10'MAP E x o PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION Buiding Height Calculat100 BOWRIDGE B Avere ratle tg B",CMeaneili 9 DB .-` REALTY 1stGFloor to Roof 3551 W Bld He h 3959 400011, 10"MAPLE /"'a i6P8UCEIe1LWO6T PIEA6ANTVW,E,N.Y.10970 26°MAPLE 94.10 14"MAPLE FIS= F I,vE�-_ M� _ C - _-- - cc 120 94.91 - fT,3'S : bCP _ BOWMAN aee36 95 = -__ 98 X PLAZA sss �10 OF 10 4� X V n \ LO1 o 10 32 dor koLE 94enx6ERawcE ♦ -'.e X �P y `n \� II RYE am N.Y. x ar�U1�tl n m 94.12 101 s® 7RU ONSTRUCT ION X �� �ti..+ c�NTRANO z Q POSED 3 ST6RN�MI�ED USE i 92 92 ", �, X� LTI-FA�1LY RF-SYDENTI�AL/ __ ,� DIVISION �UOO AIL WI�H PARKIT46 BELOW �y� ��� � � � N PRELIMINARY STREET GRADING/ asMr,920 i X - °` 1 1 SEDIMENT (A Ii X� 9 TR EG ROTELCTION HI STABI IZED 1 PLAN )c6"0 consrGon 4 l00 r / � ENTK2$NGE EF, V X.m.00 F X \ 1 = G a� �,•� �;!a 1� 3 3.27 - z P1ce. �E 94 2 m 6x 6x 97 L J SOF NE'6 - ------ --- - r- 98 m ro u� IH o 6 AX '~ m N ------------------------. --- wen Ro r wiPery a zm ziwPz wo _ w osr�€om r 93.89 esro5 O� 22 BARER PLACE oNwAY opAMAT�HTo a�9 �� 2 EX TING. PLAN ....... SCALE:1'40 GRASS SWALE of In KEY SY_NLBOL NAME QUANTITY SIZE AM AATURMAPLF 3 11"(AL ACRR CA CRAB APPLE 7 25"CAL MALL SP, KC KWANZAHCHERRY 5 25(AL WO L% `A'IIITF OAK 5 2.5'(.AI, QUERCUS ALBA O COI nR,\DO SPRUCE 1'-fig 3 (:S I IKEA PUNOFNS 0 PJCJ 1UNIPRUSORIZONTALIS 4L 2GAL. g FEDERICO IF I[Fx 76 2'-4' TD BANK ASSOCIATES L.I UPRIGHI JUNIPER 12 4'-6' t A-c"YorL lornr���� .IUNII'EILUS W 10°MAP E BOWRIDGE W REALTY LC I 1 1 wo wo wo p•MALL TI.A,X PIEA6ANTVW,E,N.P.1p5'/0 26" PLE 14 LE p i= "4 o 0 0 0 ,yam �2.... �: �t ..;;yw_..a; ..�.:..,,•: '�$ ..,.: .: �'�,'.cmc. ? .:+mY „y�y_ISA" BOWMAN J PLAZA 2 I 3 CA WO KC UJ BAFBEftPWCE 3 0.YE 6ft00KN.Y. UJ ` xME Iw KC PROPOSED 3 STORY MIXED USE FillCA DIVISION MULTI-FAMTLY RESIDENTIAL/ I RETAIL WITH PARKING BELOW � STREET PRELIMINARY Kc I LANDSCAPE 2CA PLAN m E4•�1 E Tx CA G ) Oz ILEX EXIT ci rlTYP) aE°wq 1 I I wo KC AM 1 oBA1ER PLACE Kc CA ONWAY � 2 PLAN 7 MALE:1'40 OF 10 d m rA � o0 Cultec 330 HD Recharger System FtiE�Ps�c� tieD g HOOW PELoSUN °® wow:v ov.,o nmw CULTEC RECHARGER 330XLHD CHAMBER SYSTEM SEH 1n°°` � iw 1i0 PAVED TRAFFIC APPLICATIONCc— TYPICAL CROSS SECTION DETAIL 2-0"5 UA a , •, PLAN +aincH wnsHeo Az.co—ITEon° - . LA c �T FlE oa jun i'aarl,`si rvo eanau zp DETAIL OF .. cu i�T�pp /� ASPHALT PAVEMENT REPLACEMENT z F1:LLllll.0 OVER TRENCH ""•" minnOON ASSOCIATES SECTION A A Wema°a:am�E oMm oa.o .a mom..a"� 'rvv; NOTE'.COLE STRUCTURES AND CASTINGS SHALL BE 9 a. w„v n �1e ",.,rv.�v"�:mw.g:��. •,� .me mm,..mm ve.mm�e CAPABLE OF H2O LOADING. TVF L BOWRIDGE los,_RNPEH REALTY g INTENNAL o P N LLC SCORED CONCRETE SIDEWALK DETAIL of CULTEC,Inc. PH:11-1„s CULTEC cGmaclo®and RechaFgeO oH:Ieoal4ttITE ” P.O.B°x26U Pla�l'��sePn�°nd sl°rmw°ler�h°tubers "HANDICAP Pn"KiNc oNLr'SIGN w CONCRETE ASPHALT ON CONCRETE PAVEMENT Fx.Iwc3lLne-Iasz FILLED STEEL PROTECTION POST REPLACEMENT OVER TRENCH BTs Eeaeral R°aa w E — CULTEC INSPECTION PORT DETAIL Hro°kflela,CT u68Gi 11HA w (N"T.S.) 7SPRUCE ML IDURT PLEA6ANTV W.E,N.Y.If8Y0 g _ Holophane RSL-350 SeFleg L-1-i, BOWMAN ResIdentlal Llghling Post Top Maximum—I ht-521bs PLAZA g DETAIL OF ASPHALT DRIVEWAY & �W.p CONCRETE CURB m � Rzvy�l,,,.�y° may,- enReeRPwce PARKING AREA sa°gA'1�^�` 9'� „„,„ AWRROOR,N.Y. .err aaam� �PN :p.'mN'R'NEYL 7A8�dMt0d:""s �..a...�Ea wmuu�. pn� ( CONCRETE ORNEWAYlPRON DETAILWIIN SIDEWALK t�� °"w`�”°"'"""""""""m-QI - W. BOWMAN AVE -�--«-mac..-^-« I'1�„a TAXING DETaL-mEEs 3•CAI OR E ss DETAILS UWDi— E� —LIL w..,g"a�'"ictus swupec a1Ewn To Fln""cwnE s LEss iN�w I., P�io6. !,ITT0 Eo aY� DETAIL OF FIREHYDRANTNIOtlB.1tll ��a= ==^ IIY�}L �,� � �m po- � y ® I I� t any Xvd tau m,M1e + ® ° w°..a=n.°. Kw.wre _ — tim- of Pmve¢ed s�odmg by uM Ard-inR �w k ass �>j,,o 0 em xPamg mavwLsv f w F NE'Ra ' remv Iticl Pandng,wave en of wovVm w waW... u.w w_ 4g ardumping of ewmmWn Jebrls Cry. � Fm rcmailnsha^Ishe veld mahea.aM m(my fevming and'w ,<.,N wood barters far WlvWual veer aW grvups u(aces m h I 6� v N tlul h ull.d.Fencing m hartles sHu 4 pWN CC6f � �' auuide Vtedrlp uiu of allurear veer ve eurlvn eM amarai ,u6ao a. ,m v • pvolubnad xuvvvies'n red M1all be Dlacea on Ove. ��TTII�vI %1TRE£PROTECTCN DETAIL _ M121, N m J • a u� `J� . an®,v• " maNu4W�ifuwvelnu0eamstrvcv on DeY,od mmlvmM enl .mr�riaui. "u � € Pmceeted ares sM1au be v mM Is a nvGad arbors � avnr�m"' .v ao.a.oem " dmermme ewAdm and M1mldatw Dleacv of cumuucu InspaGvm slap he made mre a yen.d— z—z o (or ae lees Ars emwv9 aeaspns aflm wmDledm of ONE WAY SIGN DETAIL "'"`""�""�"°'�"` �semn,�"°� []NU[} DETAIL OF WATER SERVICE CONNECTION (SIM.TO FlRE IANE AND DO NOT PNTPR SIGN DETAIISI emavcul veer damageaw tinea br mmw.ew,aea.mre.a, b immed'mmlY reP tis»m Ne sa¢stamipn of Ne mwlcipaliry. LAMP POST DETAIL OF 10 . .... IT- ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ -------- rL 7RE I w1m I Off SEWER CONNEcEno FEDERICO ASSOCIATES ------------ DIUMESTER H� ST—ITI.11-T 1-21 Hi ENCLOSURE PLAN DETAIL BOWRIDGE DIUMESTER ENCLOSURE PLAN DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE SECTION DETAIL REALTY LLC M.- 6`6,10,10 W.—.11 7 SMUCE MEL 00URT SOLD L— AT NIA I 111D BELGIAN BLOCK CURB n kSAMYMNPL 10570 77 D,Ml FA A R E N DETECTABLE TACTILE FINISH SIT CE OF WARNING SURFACE FILE SLOPES T B APPEAR CE WITH ANSI BOWMAN BY ARMOR TILE AC GOP, INSTALLED PER ADA 117A REQUIREMENTS A>< FINISH SURFACE OF S'REMENTA FDD PLAZA MANUFACTURERS ILAII I I TE ALCOR TO BE N CCC RDANCE WITH AN 1 00A HAMIER�CE 0, CE ........... A A RM N.Y. SECTION A—A SECTION B—B SIDE ME NOTE, ALL STRUCTURES AND CASTINGS SHALL BE C4,FABL.OF PO LOADPEG PLAN HIIE I—El— DROP CURB & RAMP TNI`lE`l`TL 11AUNT + SO IR E _A, A ]_lIPll A DETAILS --------------------- SECT ON ECIUTL MR NT, n-zv,�z� f111C, PLAN DROP CURB & RAMP PlA.E I AASIBELL LUIII ....... NOTE: HEIL— Catch BUD!, NO Curb ore L 1. _Pz F&,IB�,SN 117 L KAV` OR AN— C P—L SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE DETAIL OF CAT I�IHEAQ Fl— NOTE, ALL STRUCTURES AND CASTINGS SHALL BE CURB TYPE A CAPABLE OF H2O—C)A,ONG BI —,A1111H.ERT N.T.S. '1��%AA -11-1-RIU..PLt ATEII AT I 1AIT `—D 1.11 IL— TF —DR--D-- �l 11PIAIT—11ETE TIP 11 ILU T A T-- L—Li 11 "1`1 I'E'I'A IT DETT"'FS " I 'lull" I—El U-1 z I A /—FB'NOlA--ll`UlDS.Nl- 1-1 E- ------------ —A Enavrea°so couvncrzn 5EE UTILITY 11E _PUP,_E : R-rl -TZ., --- ------ PE�� 2 F FRONT MEW SECTION A—A SECTION A A DETAIL OF FLAT SLAB REINFORCEMENT Q OF PRECAST CONCRETE DRAIN INLET DETAIL LAYOUT OF SLAB CATCH B TYPE A N.T.S. WITH SUMPOVERFLOW STRUCTURE 9 NOTE, All STRUCTURES AND CASTINGS 31111 BE NOTE, ALL STRUCTURES AND CASTINGS SHALL BE NOTE, ALL STRUCTURES AND CASTINGS-',HALL BE NOTE, ALL STRUCTURES 4ND CASTINGS 3H411 BE OF 10 CAPABLE OF H2O LOADING. CAPABLE OF H2O LOADING, CAPABLE OF H2O LOACIING, GAFAEELF OF H2O LOADING. GENERAL CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCING NOTES All N E ..EA.E R,H,N,i/a," PERCOLATION£TEST HOLE DATA: wp n,Nx el n,f�re th,p to any earthwork,all....P,OD control rascal,,shall be Ire V,Ml In accordance with vl�razvnew �3a MET, -sT�F �c cl ) the plans and malntalned fn effectNe condition Throughout the construction period. A=— —��� /\36 PERGOLATI 2 TEST HOLE#I WA5 LOCATED 25 FEET OFF BARBE2 aow `N�o aow Irv'"N MI fcrvx PLACE AND 20 FT.OFF THE 1.Install Constrvct on Fence and S It Fenc ng s oa"H xi r�rs" 11- PROPERTY LINE,PI WAS 36"DEEP,MED.BROWN COLOR,SILTY Stake per meter of s to w th orange consMuctign 6 csvm l `6•oEvm areourvo- LOAM WITH fencing. II� s mlry re MODERATE GOMPAGTION DUE TO IT5 LOCATION NEAR THE 5'os on Control Measure Y DRIVEWAY. THE PERI HOLE nstallat on of s It fencn t the down- 4 a areas d For .v .v tiflrv. TEST WA5 STARTED AT—A AND 5TABILAFF)AT 1:02 WITH A disturbance. In-DO11,Mt g Ana 11 beeins[Alled around trees to bee awed as INSTALLATION NOTES wy �w w w RATE OF 20 MIN.PER protections INCH. T 9:22 PE161 WERE WITTNE55ED AND RECORDED. PAT grading plan and detail sheets H E 10. PfxsPscr uE vsw TIMELEVEL ri .Stabilized Gonstructlon A,1... as"nnlNIII Posr 9.22 265" Prior to an a oval and/gr re r gF _ d I.FxcAVArEAnlrrM.clwx ms<.o rwexa.l.l.h..�rffrrxol:::�I r�:IrEhe. rl'S'auacsw/xicnx1 sly rn�csx� 132 21" 20MIN/INGH y vsget g ading Andy k kindg pa a„mEP�rs,a„,,.rnEa.u,aw.�re...:i,,.:��.:�.re ::rzE: p 9.34 25.5" shall b2 con=tra ed In cgnFormance with he details An location Illustrated the ecs war wa+vlac.ury os zwv. Ne)w1ti nsrsa amu o IAIN. q AA 265" 20 MI GH approved plan. �ury T—A nreYYrvn 1445 24" IN FEDERICO Erose ` LLIt-I�H55 2425 AD MIN/NCH'(MAY HAVE MADE A MISTAKE ON ASSOCIATES Nr AL.DEATH REAo1N6) e,ranee a name nergn e encu be scar red and regraded 9-111tAT to remO'e bu IIPTxp dlr� IP INLET PROTECTION �r a"""�o�'e0 Neeo ns ,n ry rv. s 1. 1EE 2i s" 20 MIN/INCH and sed mems-n M,upper Ayers m ensure proper Functon ng. 0109 los - N'1,S CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS a 21° 20 MN/INCH o: USE 21-EO MI RATE 3 Glearina aF V aetatian oESGRIPT oa srmFFs.vows suns eF srFFF Fn'D oa a me oa uAnowaoo ERG TEST n 2 WAS LOCATED 20 FEET OFF THE EAGK PROPERTY TV, ontractor ar the,xis Nng vegetation within the limits of disturbance For the proposed e M M �e.��II nl�e. TENINE AND 25 FEET OFF n5 tructlA xcluding ex O Yg trees Flagged tar n.Chip All brush and trees that a ved ` m.v °v. .ev 5 v�" 5 r ry xa w ry wia i P wry THE 5TOGKADE FENDS. P2 WA5 36 INGHE5 DEEP AND WAS HER for later use as mulch or haul AFF site 8 dispose oFmproperly. Grub root systems and stumpsm 2TV2 c EROWg SILT LOAM EARL EST ERE STARTED 8:32 AND A 5TABILIZED RATE OF IO A Rtl_ fa a e s,Buxdina Sites n INH/INC NAA BOWRIDGE MAINTENANCE/INSPECTION EVER AT IM THE PERG RATES WERE RECORDED AND The ontractor shall comm ough grading of lire proposed parking a and building site Including Pa Fa al nr TNE55ED STARTING AT dsposl" and c0mpacFmg o Orth F s per the grading pia ompac Han of fill a shall scoso nrvo mArcewr acuoeco wxsry 9.124 TIME LEVEL SALTY D,In 12"Ilfts and compacted�E q5%densly.coring c nstruct—the co tractor shall ensure tAt all q2A 105" REALTY stow Md—wUhl,the constrvcHon areas is being DM1d ned on site. 9.34 205" 10 MINS/INCH LL�..r Gu=lch Control Measure �moro �" P "a" ALL FENCE q36 Iq" MI 9.A, 20" II N/INGH All newly gradeda s shall be stabilized with appropriate vegetal Ne cover and/or mulch. IIAA 11" Contractor snail ensnare that adegVD,slit Fe 9 Is IT place and functloning properly during q5q 011 II MINS PER INGN earthmoNng actNltles. Soil Stockpiling AND enc ore USE PERG RATE OF 1-15 MINS IMWCE IEW ODURT DEEP TEST HOLE5 I AND 2 WERE 6 FEET DEEP GON515TIN6 OF pTNg6pNfyp7,Ky N.Y.10570 TYPICAL URBAN GONE 5 Fnal Grad na of Park na Areas and Drlvewau ism o 2< \ursrervnrc welanr INEITU ODLE WERE NOT GLEARLY DEFINED BECAUSE THE AREA 2Ell HAP BEEN DISTURBED IN - The contractor shall commence MITI grading of the parking area Including the 9—he for the 2'T" THE PAST. THE SOILS NOTED WERE MED BROWN SILT LOAM WITH subbase. xm rcmAnmmown man ,Erect T, I DAID AREAS OF L16HT 6REY Erosion Control Measure wlxs assn SANDY SILT WITH TR AH 5 OF GL Y. NO 6ROND WATER WA5 BOWMAN PRESENT BUT THE BOTTOM R OF GOntractor shall ensure that all silt Fencing Is Functianing properly rvhfle parking area and driveway THE HOLE NEAREST THE ROAD WA5 MOIST WITH MOTTLING AT 6.5 grading',ogre sec. P nr 2 xA s.� To,FEET AN DLD D PLAZA 6 Drg nage and ut w cons r.,c gn " IMx1rvn sEPnc srsreM was eNcouNTeReD w me MIDDLE of THE Arzea. APter the parking a way ha en graded,t II IION,Installation of drive A x q pal-king area and SrI teeny=corm SrgTYg9e Faareres And nralnPe r��g�GoraAnGe with tnA er,glneering /AI.4� ,w. m,unnw .I.�r\ ArvcxoAs J details and manufacturers speclHcatlans. s-roNF BAFEEftPWCE Er on i RYE 6AOOK,N.Y. 1%,G-�hing operm s For drainage wayn nth shall bs lett open er oa..o nwlr 3l0 YlY'O rt�lumcr 'g "A"',ate ed n pl...it'4et At areto tat cin 1 a 3 Fr App—pro p dshD Amps to t vnm aasm eu¢ma saluao.m '�Ar Saba by�as the trench and be safely cgmsyed A the drain Inlets and drain In tt prAtectfgn shall be srz sann,nau rats w.w.�ow lurru.rcxasururs r'"were Rhe EIxN,N[W YOAI �„ @,�.m anauu� =swum. 1GastrucHon aF Dwellings CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS Pec ze[#m e:wLoiz s lnpec TdeC tt 5rrM5 ontractor shall commence construction OF proposed divellings.Grade land A,new elevations rl r a rA cl un un nx r sho non the plans. an N a ai es oorvsrreucrsn or z x a oorvs-neuenory Sdd as_a ti{vc title- 81,�af ii.� " n Erosion ControLEN" NET mnNes $�dYSE{acr.@ i.Mn e'0 MNRR Contractor shah e e that All approved s ting is 1,G-at the per meter of the dwelling. InIYdnkdaap= om91 cr. d11IR,Y,all MTRH From the dwe11N,..A s 11 be sagely c ueyed to the drain inlets.Immediately following establishment of the elude of hehsubsolL topsoil and seed with specHled seed ma and 41f?=W'aeamiurt3= OOIRt eL2 L'Mn mUld,Iwim hay. TME oa2v rrs r,m� MET ANn HEH Iry ra1re.=ArvnreA�nre.F frervArf wfI rr -•6 a,«a o. o,/=,.� ❑SETMS P R M E DETAILS fi Aepharta Ender e Top course P ent rt�em�spGa�s asayi LF_ u.,e�rnL The onMactor shall commence and acomplate paving of the parking areas and driveways In CURB DROP INLET P—NStlexYl area M1xla P!i)x H;In10I 11A DIE11MENT 11—RHO 1� ,I cordance with thea d la s.—lders sha11 be backfilled and final ded to PROTECTION°^^- pplzve p n gra Pertreer y Feg'A of serer IJO 3G5 51T 1 xf. conform with approved grading plans. Sitlewyl ahaapbm nMMus=S9eaN xpae2te ITi a,F, On e the bnder course has been completed starmwater.111 be able to enter the catch basins Fane.mow MrRxlrtpvdos• and dra n mets and be conveyed through the dA nage system S nca the catch bas'n r M,Mll D, set at a h gher elevat on than the bnder course levet on the contractor ry II have D, Gaup= si e the water enters the catch b—,grates- Th an be accampl shed by ether re J tempo Hly remov ng thurb z cpl—,from the eaten ba'n trams or temp,A,rIIy building up the ^^ asphalt to the rim Ie Vat on the high side AF catch basin. ourvo cLorn 11-1 (--Q 1.Vegetate Slte as xrsoFrvnnL Euw rra 18a ms^'I�r�mi 6 1az R EO.F,p� Establsh vegetation in all 11--d areas m accordance with proposed planting plans. ourvo Im�nnn�� o Remgxe Excess sed men _DON After the AR,has been com�pl t Iy t b d end me d-M-T er drA ngge s,tem 1 _ f + n�� r t Opsratongl guom gee E d from greAs ga�gr me s m fencing P�ry rvFw N .s e. 'N" rem acnOg'.hp-,'-' ns s A cA hell be d dspos d If gpprgved gcgY ac-epmbe m me v�ages CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS yOF NEW AMwlMuucr�ICDx50wo OTpppccTrr oN Afswc EnRE, mcrvcc AT 11 AM wnerec ti~eq'� nl nry - ro xl.nfe>Iryucs. '6 m c) ITT IN PR DOR tHIND MPM11211 It'IF sNPc mIIN r n W,eA wL of Pucco ovfn THE EMIE AREA 11 ore ro Puarvc IMPnncrlc+c.n Mwrvr>eic atom wlrx si s�CROcoPFs win aF PFaminFo- s � i4dnry S Prvri P.E.P.C. 3Fimiid 6iK o are rrenarsn oM0 PHH1 reioxrs or war .. .�fe.Nw Y^h ice] tm TA rvr r NSPEII"IION INn N�ED MANTENArvIE-T ref RE-III AEreEA1H 10 _ Rluzeo CaNSTRucrION OF 10 ENTRANCE FEDERICO ASSOCIATES 91- a "°x R°°F,3rAz BOWRIDGE J RELLC Y 0 7 SMUCE HOL WORT %EA6ANTV W.E,N.Y.Ifd70 BOWMAN o PLAZA ❑❑ W RARRERPWCE m BROOE:N.Y.armu Q � O J Q Q E O BARBER PLACE ELEVATION �t N��OF NE'R BARBER PLACE ELEVATION SCALE:IN•_I'-V A2 OF FEDERICO ASSOCIATES W IL a MAX ROOF 13].42 BOWRIDGE noQ 4 RELLC Y 0 7 ENCEIML lAWNNT %EA6ASATVW.E,NN.Y.Ifd70 1 ID 0 0 BOWMAN ID PLAZA fl BAEBEHP CE eft001'N.RP Fff Ell Y.armu Q 0 ,.. �u.. Q °o SIGN S[GN BOWMAN AVENUE ELEVATION FIT= our AV �t N��OF NE'ft BOWMAN AVENUE ELEVATION SCALE:1/4'-I'-0" Al OF ------------- --------------- L-------------- ------ T-j r------- - ------ I rL I FEDERICO ASSOCIATES BOWRIDGE REALTY - - - - - - -� - - -�- -�- - - �- - - - - - - LLC RE 7 SMUCE IML WORT PIEAGANnTIA N.Y.IWO - BOWMAN PLAZA N _. RARREft PLACE I I ftYE eR00K,N.Y. ELEVATOR MEGH. BASEMENT PLAN —- 27 16 16 14 73 �2 OaFI gE _ I I I I y � I D 0 O afl N��OF NE'R ---- 1 I I L--------------- L--------------JI ------J --------------J --------- --------------------J `--------------------J --------------------� _ o BASEMENT PLAN _ SCALE:V4'-1-T A3 OF TERRACE TER2AGE ❑ LIV,wG AREA BEDROOM1 ❑ LIVING AREArL 14 1 1111 BEDROOM 2 P s' FEDERICO ❑ BEDRooM uNIT ASSOCIATES x TYPE 6BUNIT Feei 2 BEDROOM UNIT � LQQ1 � TYPE'A'UNIT ° KITCHEN ° BO GE REALTY o0 0� RETAIL�PAeE LLC �0 A�-Fl MEGH 0 0 B arcHa n sME aH E 7SPRUCE IML WORT r 3'�, zssa PIEASANTVRLF,N.Y.Ifd70 O OLAUNDRY LAUND Y EryTRy 0U 7 BOWMAN BEDROOM 2 PLAZA eaosv � y RARRERPWCE OO- \ I ftYE 8ft001'N.Y. " Ro li E�NFRry ENTRY Awe DRY LAU i KITCHEN9}e��� a.mo O A x-mse 6MEGsHz � s ME xHx � � ELEVAT02 °° o � � � ® FIRST FLOOR K4axHN o ED PLAN �a �y 1 BEDROOM UNIT El 2 BEDROOM UNIT ] E1— NPsasD ❑ TYPE'B'UNIT O TYPE'B'UNIT LIELE7, Ll N��OF`NE'R ❑ BEDROOM 2 BEDROOM U I m s LIVING AREA s.�os LIVING 6REA ❑ as na ❑ sa3nzsv BEDROOM II z^cu i.ross x.ross TERRACE „p TERRACE TERRACE ,p TOTAL_FLOOR AREA: FIRST FLOOR PLAN 111.51, SCALE:V4'-I-T A4 OF 6 TERRACE TERRACE TERRACE scsa � LIV,wG AREA ❑ O 11-C 1 B EDROOM ❑ BEDROOM ❑ scse ❑ LIVING AREA BEEll. — E 2 71 , E R' rL FEDERICO [:] �BEDRoorr unlT ❑ ❑ ASSOCIATES 'x TYPE'B'UNIT ❑ ,,�.,,, :ir xs i 2 BEDROOM UNIT _ wlc. TYPE UNIT �� ,,,,Oe � 00 g7CHEn ❑ BOWRIDGE - 00 2 BEDRooM uNIT ❑ REALTY �� so O MECH. 0 TYFE'B'UNIT MECH 0 sl IB 6ME GH o arcAa �'� 7 GANnIAmoaT %EA6ANTV W.E,N.Y.Ifd70 LAo%DRY I 0 O - LAUNDRY LAUNO Y ENTRY 0 ENTRY 4'Ell FFED D o KITC ",EN BOWMAN BEDROOM2 00 PLAZA z —Do- e.ssF ________—00 BA89EBPLACE 8YE 8800E N.Y. a o annmr _ l jNT1Y ----Qo___00 KITCHEa C'] ENTRY �' ENTRY RY LAUND KITCHEN LAUND D� R 00 x-mse Hz � s MECH. xHz � ELESVATOR 00 00 ❑ SECOND FLOOR o uP rzs' wrxv sHnFr KITCHE° 9N � PLAN El a� -------------------- ❑o ' 1 BEDROOM UNIT �y 1 BEDROOM UNIT - 2 BEDROOM UNITI N,asasD ❑ TYPE'B'UNIT O TYPE'B'UNIT ❑ 8 �t ❑ ❑ OF NE BEDROOM2 BEDROOMS BEDROOMS ms.�as as nas ❑ LIVal 3G AREA +rvx+zs LIVING AREA ❑ BEDROOM'I z'ws �ao.e x so.e ❑ TERRACE TERRACE .q TERRACE LIVING AREA ��o.s yaws ,ams TOTAL-FLOOR AREA: �aw6 .` ye d.e_ac,.u�v, SECOND FLOOR PLAN SCALE:V4'-I-T A5 OF TERRACE TERRACE TERRACE scsa � LIV,wG AREA ❑ O 11-C 1 B EDROOM ❑ BEDROOM ❑ scse ❑ LIVING AREA BEEll. — E 2 71 , E R' rL FEDERICO [:] �BEDRoorr unlT ❑ ❑ ASSOCIATES 'x TYPE'B'UNIT ❑ ,,�.,,, :ir xs i 2 BEDROOM UNIT _ wlc. TYPE UNIT �� ,,,,Oe � 00 g7CHEn ❑ BOWRIDGE - 00 2 BEDRooM UNIT uNIT ❑ REALTY�� so O MECH. 0 TYFE'B' MECH 0 sl IB 6ME GH o arcAa �'� zssa AGAN E BRA WBRT %EA6ANTV W.E,N.Y.Ifd70 LAo%DRY I 0 O - LAUNDRY LAUNO Y ENTRY 0 ENTRY 4'Ell FFED D o KITC ",EN BOWMAN BEDROOM2 00 PLAZA z —Do- e.ssF ________—00 BARBERPLACE RYE RRCCE N.Y. a o annmr _ l jNT1Y ----Qo___00 KITCHEa C'] ENTRY �' ENTRY RY LAUND KITCHEN LAUND D� R 00 x-mse Hz � sMECH. xHz � ELESVATOR 00 00 ❑ THIRD FLOOR o uP rzs' wrxv sHnFr KITCHE° 9N � PLAN El a� -------------------- ❑o ' 1 BEDROOM UNIT �y 1 BEDROOM UNIT - 2 BEDROOM UNITI N,asasD ❑ TYPE'B'UNIT O TYPE'B'UNIT ❑ 8 �t ❑ ❑ OF NE B BEDROOM2 BEDROOMS BEDROOMS ms.�as as nas ❑ LIVal 3G AREA +rvx+zs LIVING AREA ❑ BEDROOM'I z'ws �ao.e x so.e ❑ TERRACE TERRACE .q TERRACE LIVING AREA ��o.s yaws ,ams TOTAL-FLOOR AREA: �aw6 .` ye d.e_ac,.u�v, THIRD FLOOR PLAN SCALE:V4'-I-T A6 OF BUILDING DEPARTMENT VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK 938 KING STREET RYE BROOK,NY 10573 (914)939-0668 Phone (914)939-5801 Fax mizzo a ryebrook.org Memorandum To: Planning Board From: Michael J. Izzo, Building& Fire Inspector CC: Date: April 6, 2015 Re: 80 Bowman Ave., Proposed Mixed-Use Building, ZONING ANALYSIS The following analysis is based on the latest materials submitted on March 17, 2015 by Federico Associates, on behalf of the applicant, Bowridge Realty, and include; • Plan set; Bowman Plaza, pages A-1 of 6, A-2 of 6, 4 of 10, and 6 of 10, dated Mar.16, 2015, sealed by Anthony F. Federico, RA. 1. 4250-32.G.(1) The minimum required front yard setback is 30 feet. The applicant proposes a front yard setback of 10.2 feet at the Barber Place elevation. 2. 25& 0-32J.'The minimum required usable open space is 200 sq. ft./dwelling unit, with 16 dwelling units proposed for a total of 3,200 sq. ft. §250-6.B.(3) mandates that the minimum dimension for usable open space is 20 feet. The applicant is proposing no code compliant open space. 3. 4250-6.G.(l)(c)[41 The minimum required number of parking spaces is 48 under the following schedule; Residential= 36 spaces - Retail= 12 spaces. The applicant is proposing to provide a total of 39 parking spaces. April 9, 2015 RESOLUTION TO SET A PUBLIC HEARING ON AN APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF A LOT MERGER, ZONE CHANGE AND SITE PLAN TO CONSTRUCT A MIXED-USE BUILDING AT 80 BOWMAN AVENUE WHEREAS, an application has been submitted by Frank and Virginia Madonna, for Bowridge Realty, LLC (the "Applicant"), for approval of a lot merger, zone change and site plan approval to construct a three-stoiy, mixed-use building, consisting of ground-floor retail space, residential apartments and associated parking, on property located at the southeast corner of the intersection of Bowman Avenue and Barber Place in the FAH District. Said premises being further identified as Section 141.27, Block 1, Lots 26, 31, and 32 on the Town of Rye Tax Assessor's Map; and WHEREAS, the proposal is an Unlisted Action pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA); and WHEREAS, the Planning Board, upon issuance of a Notice of Intent to Declare Lead Agency and expiration of the required thirty day period, declared itself Lead Agency, by resolution adopted February 5, 2015, for purposes of a coordinated review pursuant to SEQRA; and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Village of Rye Brook Planning Board shall hold a Public Hearing on June 11, 2015 at 7:30 p.m., at Village Hall, 938 King Street, Rye Brook, New York to consider the application for approval; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Applicant is directed to comply with Section 250-40 of the Village Code regarding notification. On motion by , seconded by , Mr. Michel Nowak, Superintendent of Public Works, called the roll: Domenic Accurso, Jr. Voting Robert Goodman Voting John Grzan Voting Bill Laufer Voting Amy Schoen Voting Daniel Tartaglia Voting Gary J. Zuckerman, Chairman Voting April 9, 2015 RESOLUTION REFERRING AN APPLICATION TO THE RYE BROOK ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FOR APPROVAL OF A LOT MERGER, ZONE CHANGE AND SITE PLAN TO CONSTRUCT A MIXED-USE BUILDING AT 80 BOWMAN AVENUE WHEREAS, an application has been submitted by Frank and Virginia Madonna, for Bowridge Realty, LLC (the "Applicant"), for approval of a lot merger, zone change and site plan approval to construct a three-story, mixed-use building, consisting of ground-floor retail space, residential apartments and associated parking, on property located at the southeast corner of the intersection of Bowman Avenue and Barber Place in the FAH District. Said premises being further identified as Section 141.27, Block 1, Lots 26, 31, and 32 on the Town of Rye Tax Assessor's Map; and WHEREAS, the proposal is an Unlisted Action pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA); and WHEREAS, the Planning Board, upon issuance of a Notice of Intent to Declare Lead Agency and expiration of the required thirty day period, declared itself Lead Agency, by resolution adopted February 5, 2015, for purposes of a coordinated review pursuant to SEQRA; and WHEREAS, the proposal requires the issuance of one or more zoning variances, to be determined by the Rye Brook Building Inspector; and WHEREAS, the Applicant wishes to appeal to the Rye Brook Zoning Board of Appeals for those variances rather than modify the project to conform to the existing zoning restrictions. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that for the reasons stated herein, the Village of Rye Brook Planning Board hereby refers the application listed herein to the Zoning Board of Appeals for a determination on the required variances as identified by the Rye Brook Building Inspector. On motion by , seconded by , Mr. Michel Nowak, Superintendent of Public Works, called the roll: Domenic Accurso, Jr. Voting Robert Goodman Voting John Grzan Voting Bill Laufer Voting Amy Schoen Voting Daniel Tartaglia Voting Gary J. Zuckerman, Chairman Voting -2- April 9, 2015 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SUBMISSION OF A REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES ON AN APPLICATION SEEKING REZONING OF PROPERTY LOCATED AT 80 BOWMAN AVENUE IN CONNECTION WITH A PENDING APPLICATION FOR LOT MERGER AND SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT A MIXED USE MULTI-FAMILY/RETAIL BUILDING BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rye Brook Planning Board hereby adopts the attached Report and Recommendation to the Rye Brook Board of Trustees on an application by Bowridge Realty, LLC to rezone property located at 80 Bowman Avenue from FAH to C-1 in connection with a pending application to the Rye Brook Planning Board for approval of a lot merger and site plan to construct a mixed use multi- family/retail building. On motion by , seconded by , Mr. Michael Nowak, Superintendent of Public Works, called the roll: APPROVING THE REFERRAL RESOLUTION: Ayes: Nays: Abstain: Excused: ACCURSO, GOODMAN, GRZAN, LAUFER, SCHOEN, TARTAGLIA, ZUCKERMAN REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION FROM THE RYE BROOK PLANNING BOARD TO THE RYE BROOK BOARD OF TRUSTEES ON AN APPLICATION SEEKING REZONING OF PROPERTY LOCATED AT 80 BOWMAN AVENUE IN CONNECTION WITH A PENDING APPLICATION FOR LOT MERGER AND SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT A MIXED USE MULTI- FAMILY/RETAIL BUILDING I. APPLICATION OVERVIEW The Rye Brook Board of Trustees (the "BOT") is currently considering an application by Bowridge Realty, LLC seeking rezoning of property located at 80 Bowman Avenue (the "Property") from FAH to C-1 in connection with Bowridge Realty's pending application to the Rye Brook Planning Board for lot merger and site plan approval to construct a new, mixed use multi-family and retail building with associated parking. On November 10, 2014, the BOT referred the application to the Village of Rye Brook Planning Board for consideration and for a report and recommendation thereon pursuant to Section 209-3 of the Village Code. II. BACKGROUND On November 27, 2012, the BOT granted an application by Bowridge Commons, LLC seeking to rezone the Property from C-1 to FAH in connection with Bowridge Common's plan to construct a new affordable housing development on the site. Pursuant to Section 250-26.1(E)(5) of the Village Code, the rezoning is due to expire automatically on November 27, 2015, and revert back to C-1, unless construction of the project is commenced by that date. After obtaining rezoning of the Property in November, 2012, Bowridge Commons was unable to obtain the necessary funding for the affordable housing development and was forced to abandon that project. As a result the Property remained undeveloped. In or about August 2014, Bowridge Realty, LLC submitted the instant application seeking to development the Property as a mixed use multi-family and retail building. Because the new proposal will not function as affordable housing, the Property must be reverted back to the original C-1 District. Accordingly, Bowridge Realty has submitted an application to the BOT requesting that the zoning be changed back to CA prior to November 27, 2015. III. DISCUSSION The Planning Board discussed the rezoning component of Bowridge Realty's project at its meeting on April 9, 2015, during which Village consultants and staff also provided input. The Planning Board members offered the following comments and conclusions with respect to the rezoning petition: 1. 2. IV. CONCLUSIONS Based on the foregoing, the Planning Board finds that Bowridge Realty's request to rezone the Property back to C-1 prior to November 27, 2015 is appropriate. Bowridge Common's earlier plan to develop the Property as an affordable housing development has been abandoned and will not go forward. Consequently, the FAH zoning designation -3- will inevitably revert back to C-1 on November 27, 2015 pursuant to Section 250- 26.1(E)(5) 50-26.1(E)(5) of the Village Code. Bowridge Realty's new plan to develop the Property as a mixed use, residential and retail building will put the Property to beneficial use and will advance objectives set forth in the Village's recently adopted Comprehensive Plan. In contrast, leaving the Property zoned FAH will serve no purpose and will only delay the Property's development. Therefore, the BOT should affirmatively rezone the property back to C-1 so development of the Property can proceed. V. RECOMMENDATIONS Based on discussions at its April 9th, 2015 meeting, the Planning Board hereby recommends to the BOT that it approve Bowridge Realty's application seeking re-zoning of the Property from FAH back to the C-1 District. Dated: Rye Brook, New York April 9, 2015 On motion by , seconded by , Mr. Michael Nowak, Superintendent of Public Works, called the roll: APPROVED AT THE APRIL 9, 2015 MEETING OF THE RYE BROOK PLANNING BOARD BY A VOTE OF - to - ACCEPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Ayes: Nays: Abstain: Excused: -4- ACCURSO, GOODMAN, GRZAN, LAUFER, SCHOEN, TARTAGLIA, ZUCKERMAN -5- April 9, 2015 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SUBMISSION OF A REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES ON AN APPLICATION BY NEW YORK SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP D/B/A VERIZON WIRELESS FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL AND A SPECIAL PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT AN ATTACHED PUBLIC UTILITY WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY AT 965 ANDERSON HILL ROAD (AKA THE DORAL ARROWWOOD HOTEL) BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rye Brook Planning Board hereby adopts the attached Report and Recommendation to the Rye Brook Board of Trustees on an application by New York SMSA Limited Partnership dba Verizon Wireless for site plan approval and a special permit to construct an attached public utility wireless telecommunications facility on the roof of the Doral Arrow Hotel located at 965 Anderson Hill Road in the PUD Zoning District. On motion by , seconded by , Mr. Michael Nowak, Superintendent of Public Works, called the roll: APPROVING THE REFERRAL RESOLUTION: Ayes: Nays: Abstain: Excused: ACCURSO, GOODMAN, GRZAN, LAUFER, SCHOEN, TARTAGLIA, ZUCKERMAN REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION FROM THE RYE BROOK PLANNING BOARD TO THE RYE BROOK BOARD OF TRUSTEES ON AN APPLICATION BY NEW YORK SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP D/B/A VERIZON WIRELESS FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL AND A SPECIAL PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT AN ATTACHED PUBLIC UTILITY WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY AT 965 ANDERSON HILL ROAD (AKA THE DORAL ARROWWOOD HOTEL) I. APPLICATION OVERVIEW The Rye Brook Board of Trustees (the "BOT") is currently considering an application by New York SMSA Limited Partnership dba Verizon Wireless ("Verizon") for site plan approval and a special permit to construct an attached public utility wireless telecommunications facility on the roof of the Doral Arrow Hotel located at 965 Anderson Hill Road in the PUD Zoning District. The proposed facility is needed to supplement Verizon's coverage in the area and alleviate the burden on existing facilities located on Village Hall and at Purchase College, both of which are anticipated to reach their respective capacity limits later this year. On February 24, 2015, the BOT referred Verizon's application to the Planning Board for consideration and for a report and recommendation thereon pursuant to Section 209-3 of the Village Code. II. DISCUSSION A. The March 12, 2015 Meeting The Planning Board members reviewed and discussed Verizon's application at the Planning Board's meeting on March 12, 2015, at which time the Village staff and consultants also provided input. The Planning Board members reviewed the Village Planner's memorandum, dated March 6, 2015, setting forth the following observations and comments: 1. The applicant should provide information on whether any element of the installation will be visible from Anderson Hill Road, especially in the winter when deciduous trees are leafless. 2. Better quality copies of the photo montages, or better quality montages, should be provided for review. In addition, the same views should be re-photographed now while the trees are leafless and new montages made to illustrate the same views in winter after installation of the facility. 3. The Applicant should provide the proposed color of the flagpole, and the proposed color should be graphically indicated in the visual analysis. The Applicant also should clarify whether the flagpole will be used to fly a flag. If so, the size and color of the flag should be depicted in the visual analysis. 4. The project is within the Z-1 Airport Overlay Zone, which states that the maximum structure height in the zone is to be measured from the elevation of the surface of the Westchester Airport runway. The applicant should verify that the proposed height of the installation will not violate the maximum height allowed based on the Z-1 Airport Overlay Zone. The Planning Board also reviewed a letter from the Doral Greens Homeowners Association ("DGHOA") to the Planning Board, dated March 12, 2015, wherein the DGHOA raised questions relating to: 1. Possible health impacts associated with radio emissions. -3- 2. The actual need for siting the project at the proposed location. 3. Potential impacts on property values. 4. The height of the project and potential impacts on planes and flight patterns at the Westchester Airport. The Planning Board considered each of these issues, with input from the Village staff and consultants. Responsive information is provided below. The Planning Board members also reviewed and considered a memorandum to the Planning Board and the Board of Trustees, dated March 12, 2015, from the Village's engineering consultant, HDR. Michael P. Musso of HDR was in attendance at the meeting on March 12th and gave an in-person presentation to the Board. Mr. Musso offered the following conclusions and recommendations concerning the application: 1. The applicant should submit more detailed information concerning existing Verizon sites, trends in call and data traffic and the need for capacity relief around the site area to supplement information in the affidavit submitted by the applicant's RF engineer. Specific information requests were provided in HDR's February 25, 2015 Supplemental Information Request to the applicant. 2. Radio emissions from the project site are anticipated to be well within the maximum permissible exposure levels prescribed under the FCC regulations. 3. Based on the proposed project dimensions, the project will not violate FAA rules and regulations, or require special FAA markings or lighting, nor will it violate the height restrictions under the applicable provisions of the Village Code. -4- 4. Proposed screening on the south, west and north sides of the equipment platform should be extended onto the east side as well. 5. All equipment (including the emergency generator), cables and conduits on the roof should be color-matched to the screening walls. 6. FCC compliant signage should be installed, inspected and maintained. 7. The hotel should implement access protocols for the roof area. 8. The project information should be forwarded directly to the Westchester County Airport for review and comment. 9. A final structural analysis should be provided to the Village Building Department as part of the building permit application. Based on the foregoing, the Board members made the following observations and comments concerning Verizon's application: 1. With respect to potential health concerns, the Planning Board has been advised by counsel that the Village and its constituent boards do not have authority to investigate this issue. Under the Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996, 47 U.S.C. § 332(c)(7)(B), specifically, the Village cannot regulate "the placement, construction, and modification of personal wireless service facilities on the basis of the environmental effects of radio frequency emissions to the extent that such facilities comply with the Commission's regulations concerning such emissions." Accordingly, the Village's inquiry into this subject is limited to confirming that the radio frequency emissions from the operation of the project will comply with -5- FCC regulations. The applicant has submitted documentation indicating that the project will comply with FCC radio emission standards. This information has been confirmed by HDR in its memorandum to the Planning Board. 2. With respect to the proposed site of the project, Verizon should provide the information requested in HDR's Supplemental Information Request, dated February 25, 2015, which includes requests for information supporting the need for the project at the proposed site. 3. With respect to impacts on property values, there is no evidence before this Board suggesting that the proposed siting of the project will have an impact on residential property values in the area. 4. With respect to impacts on air traffic and the Westchester Airport, HDR has provided information indicating that the project will not violate FAA or Village height restrictions and that special markings or lighting will not be required. However, this application should be provided to the Westchester County Airport for review and comment. B. The April 9, 2015 Meeting The Planning Board continued its review of Verizon's application at its meeting on April 9, 2015. The Planning Board reviewed a Supplemental Tech Memo from Mr. Musso (HDR), dated April 1, 2015, responding to supplemental information Verizon -6- provided following the Planning Board's March 12th meeting. Mr. Musso made the following additional conclusions and recommendations: 1. Consistent with Mr. Musso's previous comments, Verizon proposes to fully enclose the facility's equipment with cream-colored vinyl siding. However, the proposed canopy for the facilities should also be color- matched. 2. Verizon has submitted satisfactory information demonstrating that the project is necessary to improve service in the area by alleviating the burden on existing facilities on Village Hall and at Purchase College, both of which are expected to reach their respective capacity limits later this year. 3. The applicant has submitted notices to the Westchester Airport and the FAA, dated March 17, 2015 and March 23, 2015, respectively. The Westchester Airport has reportedly deferred to the FAA. The FAA's response is still pending. The applicant should track the responses from the Westchester Airport and FAA and report them back to the Village Board. Approval of a building permit for the project could be made contingent on a favorable response from FAA's determination. 4. A complete structural analysis is still required to ensure that the facility will not compromise the structural integrity of the building, but can be made a condition of approval for the project. The Planning Board also considered the Memorandum from Village Planner, F.P. Clark Associates, dated April 2, 2015. The Village Planner reported that all outstanding -7- comments concerning visual impacts and zoning have been addressed to their satisfaction. The only outstanding recommendation is that Verizon report to the Village Board on the Westchester Airport's and FAA's official responses to the application. III. CONCLUSIONS Based on the foregoing, the Planning Board is satisfied that Verizon's project will not have significant adverse impacts on air quality, noise, traffic, light, aesthetics or neighborhood character. The Planning Board is further satisfied that the project will comply with the FCC's regulations governing radio frequency emissions. Confirmation is still needed from the Westchester Airport and/or FAA that the project will not interfere with plane equipment or air traffic. A final structural analysis will also be needed to be performed by the Village Building Inspector to confirm that the project will not compromise the structural stability of the hotel building. Pending these confirmations, the Planning Board is satisfied the project will not pose a safety risk to the Village or its residents. It is evident based on the information provided by the applicant and the Village's engineering consultant (HDR) that Verizon's project is necessary to improve and guaranty the quality of communication services provided by Verizon and on which so many Village residents have come to rely. IV. RECOMMENDATIONS Based on discussions at its March 12th and April 9th, 2015 meetings, the Planning Board hereby recommends to the BOT that it approve Verizon's application, provided: -8- 1. The FAA and Westchester Airport provide a favorable response with respect to the application. 2. Approval of the application should be conditioned on the Village Building Inspector's performance of a final structural analysis finding that the project will not compromise the structural integrity of the hotel building. 3. All outstanding comments and recommendations by the Village consultants and staff are fully addressed before the application is decided. Dated: Rye Brook, New York April 9, 2015 On motion by , seconded by , Mr. Michael Nowak, Superintendent of Public Works, called the roll: APPROVED AT THE MARCH 12, 2015 MEETING OF THE RYE BROOK PLANNING BOARD BY A VOTE OF - to - ACCEPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Ayes: Nays: Abstain: Excused: ACCURSO, GOODMAN, GRZAN, LAUFER, SCHOEN, TARTAGLIA, ZUCKERMAN -9- V FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. PLANNING,TRANSPORTATION, ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT RYE, NEW YORK FAIRFIELD, CONNECTICUT DAVID H. STOLMAN MEMORANDUM AICP,PP PRESIDENT ICHAEL A.EC EXECUTIVE GALANTE EXTo: Gary Zuckerman, Chairman, and the VICE PRESIDENT Planning Board of the Village of Rye Brook 35o THEO.FREMDAVE. RYE, NEW YORK 10580 Date: April 2, 2015 914 967-6540 FAX: 914 967-6615 CONNECTICUT Subject: Review of applications from 203 255-3100 New York SMSA Limited Partnership d/b/a HUDSON VALLEY Verizon Wireless for a Special Permit and Site Plan 845 297-6056 Approval to install a wireless telecommunications facility LONG ISLAND on the roof of Doral Arrowwood, 965 Anderson Hill Road 516 364-4544 www.fpciark.com As requested, we reviewed revised applications from New York SMSA email@fpdark.com Limited Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless submitted to the Village of Rye Brook on behalf of the property owner, DCCA, LLC d/b/a Doral Arrowwood for a Special Permit and site plan approval to install a wireless telecommunications facility to include a stealth flagpole and related equipment on the roof, and a natural-gas powered back-up generator on grade in an existing outdoor equipment at the hotel building located at 965 Anderson Hill Road, Section 129.34, Block 1, Lot 45 on the Tax Assessor's Map. Property Description The hotel property is located in the PUD District, the Z-1 Instrument Approach Overlay Zone of Westchester County airport and the Anderson Hill Road Scenic Road Overlay District. The property is fully developed with a conference hotel and amenities, and it is adjacent to the Doral Green residential development to the east. The hotel property is also within 500 feet of the municipal lines of the Town/Village of Harrison and the Town of Greenwich in Connecticut, and it includes mature landscape plantings. The Blind Brook Club and the new Enclave (formerly Kingswood) development are located directly across Anderson Hill Road to the south, the Reckson Executive Park office complex is located to the north, and the Purchase campus of SUNY in Harrison is located immediately west of the property. FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. PLANNING,TRANSPORTATION, ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT RYE, NEW YORK FAIRFIELD, CONNECTICUT Project Description The Applicant proposes to locate a new wireless telecommunications facility on the roof of the north east portion of the hotel building and a natural-gas powered back-up generator on grade in an existing screened outdoor equipment area in the same general location. The facility antennas will be located in a 35-foot high stealth flag pole mounted on the hotel roof and new equipment cabinets installed on the roof will be screened by a new siding-covered wall matching existing screening already in place that will be utilized to create an enclosed screened equipment area. Review We reviewed revised application materials and plans submitted by the Applicant that include the following items: 1. Short Environmental Assessment Form 2. Site Plan Application and Checklist 3. Exterior Building Permit 4. Application for Wireless/Attached Wireless Telecommunications Facility Special Permit 5. Existing Coverage Map, no date, no preparer 6. Letter to the Board of Trustees from Snyder and Snyder, LLP, Tarrytown, N.Y., dated December 3, 2014 7. Letter to the Planning Board from Tectonic Engineering and Surveying Consultants PC, Mountainville, N.Y., dated March 25, 2015 8. Copy of Submission Letter to Westchester County Airport from Snyder and Snyder, LLP, Tarrytown, N.Y., dated March 17, 2015 9. Printout of Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration— Off Airport submitted by the Applicant to the Federal Aviation Administration 10.Statement in Support of Application for Special Permit and Site Plan Approval for Public Utility Wireless Telecommunications Facility, from Snyder and Snyder, LLP, Tarrytown, N.Y., dated November 24, 2014 11.Statement from All Aljibori, Verizon Wireless, West Nyack, N.Y., dated March 25, 2015 12.Statement in Support from Ali Aljibori, Verizon Wireless, West Nyack, N.Y., dated June 24, 2014 2 FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. PLANNING,TRANSPORTATION, ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT RYE, NEW YORK FAIRFIELD, CONNECTICUT 13.Noise Report for Proposed Back-Up Generator prepared by Tectonic, Mountainville, N.Y., dated November 5, 2014 14.Antenna Site FCC Compliance Assessment and Report, prepared by Pinnacle Telecom Group, Cedar Knolls, N.J. dated October 31, 2013 15.Visual Impact Assessment, prepared by Tectonic Mountainville, N.Y. dated November 7, 2013 16.Supplemental Visual Impact Assessment, prepared by Tectonic Engineering and Surveying, PC, Mountainville, N.Y. dated March 18, 2015 17.Structural Capacity Verification, prepared by Tectonic Mountainville, N.Y. dated November 5, 2014 18.Collocation Acknowledgement Statement from Ryan Maybeck, Verizon Wireless, West Nyack, N.Y., dated November 5, 2014 19.Proposed Form of Removal Bond prepared for Verizon Wireless, no date, not executed 20.Supplemental Technical Review Memorandum to the Rye Brook Board of Trustees and Rye Brook Planning Board from HDR, Mahwah, N.J., dated April 1, 2015 21.Technical Review Email to Michael Sheridan, from HDR, Mahwah, N.J., on February 25, 2015 22.Engineer's Plans, prepared by Tectonic, Mountainville, N.Y., dated November 5, 2014: Sheet Number Sheet Title Date T-1 Title Sheet 10/15/13 rev. 3/20/15 C-1 Plot Plan, Setback Map and Notes 10/16/13 rev. 3/20/15 A-1 Site Plan & Generator Detail Plan 10/16/13 rev. 3/20/15 A-2 Site Detail Plan and Elevation 10/16/13 rev. 3/20/15 A-3 Details 10/16/13 rev. 3/20/15 Please note that our review is limited to planning, zoning and environmental issues. We offer the following comments regarding the application: 1. Zoning. The proposed stealth flagpole, equipment, antennas and generator would be installed on the property and the roof of a building in the Anderson Hill Road Scenic Road Overlay District. The applicant provided supplemental visual analysis to demonstrate if any element of the installation will be visible from the Scenic Road in the winter when deciduous trees are leafless. The analysis indicates that the facility would not be visible from Anderson Hill Road, which satisfies our March 6, 2015 comment. 3 FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. PLANNING,TRANSPORTATION, ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT RYE, NEW YORK FAIRFIELD, CONNECTICUT The applicant contacted Westchester County Airport and made a formal notice to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), evidence of which was submitted for review. Any follow-up correspondence or acknowledgements or instructions from the FAA or Westchester County airport should be submitted to the Village for review. 2. Visual impacts. The applicant provided supplemental visual analysis to demonstrate if any element of the installation will be visible when deciduous trees are leafless. The analysis indicates that the facility would not be visible from Anderson Hill Road. A clearer visual analysis was provided showing existing views of the hotel building from various locations and distances surrounding the proposed area where the facility equipment and flagpole would be located. Visibility of the stealth pole appears to be confined to the immediate area of the pole. The pole will be partially seen from certain areas of Doral Green, even when trees are in leaf We did not receive new montages of the same views re-photographed while trees are leafless; however, it is only the stealth pole that is partially visible from locations where the facility is potentially visible. Our March 6, 2015 comments are satisfied. The information on the revised plans indicates that the screen walls proposed would be tall enough to completely obscure views of the new equipment cabinets. The Applicant indicates in the March 25, 2015 Tectonic letter that the color of the flagpole would be white and the flagpole will not be used to fly a flag. Our March 6, 2015 comments are satisfied. We look forward to discussion regarding the application and our comments. Marilyn Timpone Mohamed, ASLA, AICP Senior Associate/Planning/Environment cc: Honorable Mayor and the Village Board of Trustees Christopher Bradbury, Village Administrator Michal Nowak, Superintendent of Public Works/Village Engineer Philip A. Butler, Esq., Village Attorney Snyder and Snyder, LLP, for the Applicant J:IDOCS215001Ri,e Brook1538.661.Doral Arrowwood Verizon Coiocation.Site Plan Modification.PB memo2.mtrn.docm 4 IMEM CORPORATE OFFICE: Practical Solutions,Exceptional Service Mountainville,NY (800)829-6531 TECTONIC Engineering&Surveying Consultants PC. (845)567-6656 FAX(845)567-8703 1279 Route 300 www.tectonicengineering.00m Newburgh,NY 12550 Village of Rye Brook Planning Board Rye Brook Village Hall 938 King Street Rye Brook, New York 10573 March 25,2015 RE: New York SMSA Limited Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless Special Permit and Site Plan approval for Proposed Public Utility Wireless Telecommunications Facility("Facility") On the Doral Arrowwood Hotel located at 965 Anderson Hill Road, Rye Brook, NY RESPONSE TO COMMENTS Dear Hon.Chairman Zuckerman and Members of the Board: As you recall,at your March 12th meeting,comments regarding the captioned matter were received from Frederick P. Clark Associates, Inc., dated March 6, 2015, and HDR, dated March 12, 2015, respectively. Kindly note that below are the responses to any outstanding comments noted therein. FEDERICK P.CLARK ASSOICATES MEMO("FPA Memo") ZONING As indicated on Drawing C-1, under the"Note"with the Bulk Requirements,the property"complies with section 250-7D of the Zoning Code of the Village of Rye Brook, since the height of the Facility is below 155',as required by the Z-1 instrument zone,where the property is located. VISUALS Attached as Exhibit 1 hereto is a Supplemental Visual Analysis which confirms that even during leaf-off conditions, the proposed Facility will not be visible from Anderson Hill Road,the so-called "Scenic Road" referenced in the FPA Memo. In addition, attached hereto as Exhibit 2 is a better quality copy of the original Visual Analysis submitted to this Board which confirms that the Facility will not have any adverse impact. In addition, Drawing A-2 has been revised to show the height of the screen walls as well as the height of the equipment which will be completely obscured by the screen walls. Moreover, Drawing A-2 indicates that the flagpole will be "white." This color is already used to represent the flagpole in the photo simulations. A flag is not proposed in connection with the flagpole. PLANNING • ENGINEERING . CONSTRUCTION AND PROGRAM MANAGEMENT An Equal Opportunity Employer I o � Practical Solutions,Exceptional Service HDR MEMO Aesthetics As requested by HDR, a screen wall has been added on the east side of the equipment platform, as indicated on Drawing A-2. It is our understanding that since the equipment will be surrounded on all sides by screen walls,the additional comments regarding the color of the equipment are no longer applicable. Capacity Data Attached hereto as Exhibit 3 is a report from Verizon Wireless' RF engineer regarding the Facility, which includes the requested capacity data and indicates the anticipated time when those nearby sites will reach critical capacity,thereby confirming the need for the Facility. RF Safety In connection with construction of Verizon Wireless' Facility, protocols such as signage have been established for rooftop access for persons not trained in RF emissions. FAA/Airport The project information was submitted directly to the Westchester County Airport ("Airport") pursuant to the submittal attached hereto as Exhibit 4. Pursuant to the Airport's request, Verizon Wireless submitted the applicable notice to the FAA,which is attached thereto. Structural Analysis As HDR requested, Verizon Wireless will provide the necessary structural certification/analysis to the Village Building Department during the Building Permit review process, as well as comply with the applicable building codes during construction of the Facility. Please contact me at (845) 567-6656 ext. 2811 if you have any questions or require any further information. Sincerely, TECTONIC 1-award9amied Edward N. lamiceli, P.E. Senior Project Manager EXHIBIT 1 Supplemental Visual Analysis TECTONIC CORPORATE OFFICE Mountainville,NY (800)829-6531 Prankal PO Box 37,70 Pleasant Hill Road (845)534-5959 FAX:(845)534-5999 Mountainville,NY 10953 www.tectonicengineering.com Hon. Chairman Zuckerman and Members of Village of Rye Brook Planning Board Rye Brook Village Hall 938 King Street Rye Brook, New York 10573 March 18, 2015 RE: VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT New York SMSA Limited Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless Wireless Telecommunications Facility on roof of Doral Arrowwood 965 ANDERSON HILL ROAD, RYE BROOK WESTCHESTER COUNTY, NEW YORK Dear Hon. Chairman Zuckerman and Members of the Planning Board: In connection with the memorandum ("FPA Memo") from Frederick P. Clark Associates, Inc., dated March 6, 2015, with respect to the captioned matter, Tectonic Engineering & Surveying Consultants, P.C. was retained by Verizon Wireless to conduct a Supplemental Visual Resource Evaluation focusing on the"scenic road"(a/k/a Anderson Hill Road)during leaf-off conditions. Below is the Visual Impact Evaluation regarding the new pictures taken in connection with the supplemental evaluation. As detailed below, these visuals confirm that Verizon Wireless'proposed wireless facility("Facility') consisting of an RF transparent flagpole and related equipment on the rooftop of Doral Arrowwood will not be visible from Anderson Hill Road. SUPPLEMENTAL VISUAL RESOURCE EVALUATION 1.0 SETTING The proposed Facility is located at 965 Anderson Hill Road in the Village of Rye Brook. The surrounding land use along Anderson Hill Road is primarily residential, recreational, and commercial use. 2.0 METHODOLOGY On March 16, 2015, Tectonic Engineering & Surveying Consultants, P.C., conducted a field investigation for the purpose of evaluating the views associated with the proposed rooftop Facility from various locations along Anderson Hill Road. Weather conditions were partly cloudy and cool with temperatures around 40 degrees. Imm Practical Solutions,Exceptional Service 965 Anderson Hill Road 2 March 18, 2015 Photographs were taken from various vantage points within the study area to document the actual view toward the existing building. Photographs were taken using a Canon EOS Rebel XT Digital SLR digital camera with an 18 to 55 millimeter zoom lens. Unless otherwise noted, the zoom lens was set to approximately 31 mm to achieve a field-of-view comparable to a 50mm lens on a full frame 35mm camera, thereby approximating the normal human eyesight relative to scale. Using a handheld GPS unit, the coordinates and orientation of each photograph location were taken. Each photograph attached includes a brief description of the location and orientation from which it was taken. These photograph descriptions are summarized below: 1. View from Anderson Hill Road, looking north towards the proposed Facility, from a distance of approximately 2100 feet. 2. View from intersection of Anderson Hill Road and entrance to Doral Arrowwood, looking northwest towards the proposed Facility, from a distance of approximately 1300 feet. 3. View from near the entrance to Blind Brook Club from a distance of approximately 1300 feet. 4. View from entrance to Doral Greens Drive,looking west-northwest towards the proposed Facility, from a distance of approximately 1500 feet. These photograph locations are presented on the attached "PhotoLog Map." 3.0 PROCESS A visual reconnaissance of Anderson Hill Road was conducted, looking towards the site of the proposed Facility, in order to identify possible locations of partial or full visibility. During the reconnaissance it was determined that there were no locations along Anderson Hill Road where the proposed Facility would be visible, even during leaf-off conditions. 4.0 CONCLUSION As demonstrated by this evaluation and our prior evaluation, Verizon Wireless' proposed Facility at Doral Arrowwood will have no adverse visual impact to the surrounding area, and the Facility will not even be visible from Anderson Hill Road. Practical Solutions,Exceptional Service 965 Anderson Hill Road 3 March 18, 2015 If you have any questions or comments,please call the undersigned. Sincerely, TECTONIC ENGINEERING & SURVEYING CONSULTANTS P.C. 1 f Z&lj Peter T. Sutherland P.E., L.E.P., C.P.G. Vice President, Manager of Environmental Services N �, ' , " Approximate Typical PHOTOLOG MAP CL `'" Pew, Photo Location �' PROPOSED ATTACHED � � �,. t�a, � �• is ANTENNA INSTALLA- �� rrSheTm' +► yi TION ON AN EXISTING BelleFairw, STRUCTURE � Whittemore a Colk elion dela+�� yNa� Suny +� hase Pte' brary `y asp°' 'wolthEdt� 965 ANDERSON HILL RD n 7 Lereal RYE BROOK t � ps+�r 9`�ss WESTCHESTER NEW YORK OUNTY Quad , r i n•- � 4�N �0; St SZ arbtlCkS °� !� � ,+ o,y* g PT � $aI�Vrit:1l State Univetsity � � ~` of flew 4k- % w ^, Purchase College o tha�s� 15 5 Doral Arrowwood +� Hotel Conference.w Center r1 ¢ e �� Elskt°Lo VNItW_ wireless Water Baptist Cemetery y P6ze� 46' s K5L Capital PREPARED FOR: Partners a mn pr C. PREPARED BY: + is PepsiCo �� t3oa 4 `� • Hine S.Employees Federal Credit Union jk a ,3` �ti, r Merritt PrattitalSolutlons,6aeiH{ar:alSer.7:e a ., t � Cemetery Kahl raga LI�pI.,Wpods :� shags kip, � S ?"k,,PkV), Bie Brook q 70 PLEASANT HILL ROAD p �4 MOUNTAINVILLE,NY 10953 nmar 84534-5959 Group ® '9 c (FAX)845-534-5999 an ad Blind Brook r High School men 0, poBedoAthletic Fields oRidge ,'i s Rye Brook � slope}° N fudge Street, Street School .; Blind Brook;_ �a N. Baseball Krekl Baseball Field ' W.O.#6666.PURC2 March 2015 qs x Coals - ~ 1 ! :' r 1 ''+ "• 'lei g,• ,ia�•.. �! f 1"54 ,} ` i ��s• l ti. ¢yr••�3 7 I�C�,.� .1� ��.f .,r,." IT. , :�i.�A .riiJ� i f '�.. �. � .., r - i i i' �� �,:•�� fir•,• •..�3 �' JLC` 'q r�f - .:ef�' �,• �� f ���• �=: r a:. i' - - -.F.�' .ra.•..'.+...1`+,. '- � .. rry '4` '..{�i~ -moi.'. -a .. �. � -. .. '•� -M � � '.•. 5:+4'x. r:.. �,�r 4fl'r�yy'..•`y�,� .i'-£�' w :' .. .. 17 - - � _:'�a`i. - ,�Y�• tea. :^: ... ,;_ _ LOOKING NW FROM INTERSECTION OF ANDERSON HILL RD.AND TECTONIC ' ENTRANCE TO DORAL ARROWWOOD P-2 PROPOSED FACILITY WILL NOT BE VISIBLE FROM THIS LOCATION Pract;cal SolutionsAxepUwal Service DISTANCE FROM THE PHOTOGRAPH LOCATION TO THE PROPOSED SITE IS 1300'± 6666.PURC2 1 1A .�. ' �� tr���•-it R. - �s ., a �- � �.S ,,' ��'�� ••,�.�r, •�-�:-^v�� - �� • � � y. ,-mow\� •y••. � y� �1��� r e ���+ X11 -, ��'� �rY•'-.�y.._ _ `z,� _ •' '' y wtiL `� u, r.. ` •k..'-tat•fNm f ��• • 'M � � _ �V� •i _ �► �.��� y G � ,mo TECTONIC . . FROM ._BLIND BROOK LOCATION DISTANCE FROM THE . . _ LOCATION TO THE PROPOSED SITE IS 1300'± 6666.PURC2 .• � _ ! _ ate. � 1 — T-- i� -r+14 J 1 `l 14 iI{ ....� Al " z i� _ Y ; t•� !5j .A' ��!'�,'-•�- !ice'`• " - ' TECTONX LOOKING W-NW FROM ENTRANCE TO DORAL GREENS DRIVE PROPOSED FACILITY WILL NOT BE VISIBLE FROM THIS LOCATION P-4 DISTANCE FROM THE PHOTOGRAPH LOCATION TO THE PROPOSED SITE IS 1500't +Rtatfi�el S�luti;.�tts.Ext�t:i:xtai�rvi�e 6666.PURC2 EXHIBIT 2 Visual Analysis VISUAL RESOURCE EVALUATION PROPOSED ATTACHED WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS INSTALLATION 965 ANDERSON HILL ROAD RYE BROOK WESTCHESTER COUNTY NEW YORK Submitted by: Il�n�flwireless 175 Calkins Road Rochester, NY 14623 Prepared by: TECTONIC ENGINEERING & SURVEYING CONSULTANTS, P.C. 70 Pleasant Hill Road Mountainville, New York 10953 845-534-5959 845-534-5999 FAX W.O. #6666.PURC2 6/25/2014 CORPORATE OFFICE Mountainville,NY (800)829-6531 Irtackal Sa Wbus,EAcepliml Service PO Box 37,70 Pleasant Hill Road (845)534-5959 FAX:(845)534-5999 Mountainville,NY 10953 www.tectonicangineedng.com Verizon Wireless 175 Calkins Road, Rochester, NY 14623 November 7, 2013 Revised June 25, 2013 RE: W.O.: # 6666.PURC2 VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT, 965 ANDERSON HILL ROAD, RYE BROOK WESTCHESTER COUNTY, NEW YORK Tectonic Engineering & Surveying Consultants, P.C., was retained by Verizon Wireless to conduct a "Visual Resource Evaluation" to determine the potential visibility of a proposed attached rooftop installation on an existing building located at 965 Anderson Hill Road in the Village of Rye Brook, Westchester County, NY. 1.0 SETTING The proposed installation is located at 965 Anderson Hill Road in the Village of Rye Brook. The surrounding land use along Anderson Hill Road is primarily residential, recreational, and commercial use. 2.0 METHODOLOGY On November 3, 2013, Tectonic Engineering & Surveying Consultants, P.C., conducted a field investigation for the purpose of evaluating the views associated with the proposed rooftop installation from various locations in the neighborhood. Weather conditions were partly cloudy and cool with temperatures around 55 degrees. The study area consisted of an approximate Y2 mile radius from the project site. Photographs were taken from various vantage points within the study area to document the actual view toward the existing building. Photographs were taken using a Canon EOS Rebel XT Digital SLR digital camera with an 18 to 55 millimeter zoom lens. Unless otherwise noted, the zoom lens was set to approximately 31 mm to achieve a field-of-view comparable to a 50mm lens on a full frame 35mm camera, thereby approximating the normal human eyesight relative to scale. Using a handheld GPS unit, the coordinates and orientation of each photograph location were taken. Each photograph attached includes a brief description of the location and orientation from which it was taken. These photograph descriptions are summarized below: PremcalSduhm. "I sffice 965 Anderson Hill Road 2 November 7, 2013 Revised June 25, 2013 I. View from Anderson Hill Road, looking north towards the proposed installation, from a distance of approximately 2100 feet 2. View from intersection of Anderson Hill Road and entrance to Doral Arrowwood, looking northwest towards the proposed installation, from a distance of approximately 1500 feet. 3. View from the entrance to Blind Brook Club, looking northwest towards the proposed installation, from a distance of approximately 1400 feet. 4. View from entrance to Doral Greens Drive, looking west northwest towards the proposed installation, from a distance of approximately 1300 feet. 5. View from end of Doral Greens Drive E, looking west towards the proposed installation, from a distance of approximately 1200 feet. 6. View from Doral Greens Drive W, looking north towards the proposed installation, from a distance of approximately 500 feet. 7. View from Doral Greens Drive W, looking north towards the proposed installation, from a distance of approximately 300 feet. 8. View from intersection of King Street and Hettiefred Road, looking southwest towards the proposed installation, from a distance of approximately 1900 feet. 9. View from intersection of King Street and International Drive, looking south towards the proposed installation, from a distance of approximately 2000 feet. 10. View from intersection of High Point Circle and Bellefair Road looking south towards the proposed installation, from a distance of approximately 2400 feet. 11. View from Bellefair Road, looking southeast towards the proposed installation, from a distance of approximately 2200 feet. 12. View from intersection of Bellefair Road and Fellowship Lane looking southeast towards the proposed installation, from a distance of approximately 2600 feet. These photograph locations are presented on the attached "PhotoLog Map." 3.0 PROCESS The digital images were merged and manipulated through the use of the image editing software "Adobe PhotoShop CSS." With this process, the proposed antenna and associated equipment were scaled to the correct location and height, relative to the PRO 965 Anderson Hill Road 3 November 7, 2013 Revised June 25, 2013 existing building. Copies of the existing conditions and the photographic simulations are attached. 4.0 CONCLUSION The potential visibility of the proposed installation is primarily limited to the immediate area. As the proposed installation includes a stealth flagpole and a stealth enclosure, the proposed addition of Verizon Wireless equipment on the Building at 965 Anderson Hill Road will have little to no adverse impacts on existing views of the Building. Beyond the immediate area, the building and proposed installation are obstructed by mature vegetation, the sloping landscape, and/or intervening buildings. If you have any questions or comments, please call the undersigned. Sincerely, TECTONIC ENGINEERING & SURVEYING CONSULTANTS P.C. /J -r 'L� Peter T. Sutherland P.E., L.E.P., C.P.G. Vice President, Manager of Environmental Services N � ' >; A I i Approximate Typical PHOTOLOG MAP rM Photo Location PROPOSED ATTACHED ANTENNA INSTALLA- TION ON AN EXISTING BF STRUCTURE ry f y, Sur "ai` b erg �`s� 110 1 965 ANDERSON HILL RD 10 The OwlRYE BROOK WESTCHESTER COUNTY NEW YORK Quad �• arbucks Stale uni+ stty of L New York- Purchase College �r•. ? Doml kroww000 IS Hotel Confereocs A Center s 4„ '. �wrreless Wares Baptist � C"ery f Mze PREPARED FOR: KSL capital Partners GI PREPARED BY: Trattoria Bngit E ® s PepsoyeesFederal A :1 D 1 P 532 llu wyler Ctedrt tk ion TECTONIC �. PractEraiSolutions,ExceoionalSenice � •� ��' Menilt ,,t` a�� �.�`'•t cam" �� Kaia+'yoga �' fir• %ha��, +�rnr'#Qi �° � c • FMr�"r+ r ..Ave Brook 70 PLEASANT HILL ROAD s Firehouse �;.. .. _ MOUNTAINVILLE,NY 10953 kemner •f 845-5345959 Grow (FAX)845-534-5999 HO School i,m a _ ' Ponterio w Brook um�K" h g a Fkk! Street School Mind Brook. BaseballFW O le f »a I+is W.O.#8666.PURC2 NOV.7,2013 Revlued NOV.8,2013 coats .i t• 1 t 54 LOOKING N FROM ANDERSON HILL RD. PROPOSED FACILITY WILL NOT BE VISIBLE FROM THIS LOCATION P-1 DISTANCE FROM THE PHOTOGRAPH LOCATION TO THE PROPOSED SITE IS 2100 t Practical Solutions,Lxeeptic�na I Service DISTANCE +"fir-" .�r�Y=Y. r4' f•�•r���,�_µ , ,�� + rte. .,_' Y,�• _i_ =•r.a �..:����� .,'rW its �. *~ yr! amp ti r—jp } . r..�* � ' �.�•rte �+[ � � w,�• �•'� •!* .ter+" r �- r - � r � �°, _� ' � �. �-+ _ .r 7�'R y+ A�� '+ ^r •,`�t e��[�%� -_n. •az �.� pf. � - -. �" 1 1.r _ � Al 41- .' Vii,' f;• Fe .�• .. f . _ _ F .�..` .�� • :sem .fit. •�.• � ..ems. +C it �'� e• `T' max_ .�'•" �•+ `,►rye' '►'y�i=_� � �.- f,� _ � ' 4, NOW— k LOOKING NW FROM ENTRANCE TO BLIND BROOK CLUB TECTONIC PROPOSED DISTANCE I - PHOTOGRAPH14001t yiw f - i til N �- { 1 ■ . i Rt �:-' - Cwi- LOOVJNG WNW FROM ENTRANCE TO DORAL GREENSDRIVE. . PROPOSED SITE IS 13001i 66OLPURC2 E ��R i� 1 "�i�1Y a{ •::' s ��r- or it R ,�.� ..S •�� �1,�.f yin•. � %��-}-• .f. i 1 le oil L TECTONIC . . FROM . . DORAL ROPOSED FACILITY WILL NOT _ GREENS DRIVE PHOTOGRAPH . . !! r.�+�; +I + ��' + /f�f r ,� ��� �%}.v1�fj(� �� �+ fir,•. , � ,�_,. � y�►.f,� .� lam' .. :;�.I �+FL ,�'';� ... _ ��"�i!� _�•��� �+rtMl� �� w- �'�- �}rte r -� �7l`- � SY�r�•A' ,� �� �,• .c roe- ti .err �.�! .•�- �J ► r��4 :+� 11� '• x �'~�' ,40I��/ ;;51r'r�R r • ti = •. + Rowr -•�; ~ i ti'` � • !.I K -. k yak.,. .� r i r', w •'`Z'- . Ila \A ice w1 LOOKING W FROM DORAL GREENS DR.W TEC TONIC PROPOSED FACILITY WILL BE VISIBLE FROM THIS LOCATION P-6 m DISTANCE FROM THE r PHOTOGRAPH L11 F + r % ri P d• �l \er rs' / k4ti r yy �j; ;�•- � / �� i� r r� `� �"�_- •� � ,1•s� *� � SAE� � . qpl ai;�I '• fJn�- �� � '� }�' - � rz '- 'r - Y if a Sf�r/•fY� 1•r•./f�' s �'4 .w.- �; IIIIY�' r ��r•�.�1r7- •�! �°' .a'� -�ti•. � , ,^.Qo _ �� �� �� w-...."mss �.n `• �"�yR�:` �� � '��� ��-�. Wil Oil- 1+ • ' iii�. `* J cam.-� -- • ►TECTONIC - . . - . . . ff r ' I Al + :_� v .G � .� �� - - y7�'r,u_1~�1,+i`'r`4s. �r y 'l -� y� � ��,.� •�. ?�'�. ~"•. �� Re 1 TECTONICLOOKING _ . DORAL GR . - VISIBLE r^ '�. } - f„r.� �'" i {' ti l` '•�. y� �'� . �_..1" 't-_ ••� 7iµ ��� � � :ti .tip,• _ - a '. i� �_r'•'i f- �R as Ch f r� .� �" ` `°!'_`,�c'�-s r!'h•-'• .1'• ,yr_ tied.! � -- n��, , ; it •. _ _: ';'sir•-.5.:- �.` •`.rw r . . ot is AWN 'ON )1110 40 �e TECTONIC • • - • OF z Y TECTONIC LOOKING S FROM INTERSECTION OF KING ST.AND INTERNATIONAL DR. AA PROPOSED FACILITY WILL NOT BE VISIBLE FROM THIS LOCATION P-9 DISTANCE FROM THE PHOTOGRAPH LOCATION TO THE PROPOSED SITE IS 2000'± Fid '-� 6666.PURC2 �3 T Y i• �F 1 �7• .t.�` -4 rrrrr A !� •a P!. �. ... .tip ' r_ �.. _. r• - '' � r 'E• XtiSr•., �.� rr v*-5'r �►t,�.+ � ,s2" .r , { rte+ ji� i .rte - �---- y=7—. - _ r r.y + •_- -, — _ ` TECTONIC / • FROM - • /VISIBLEACILITY WILL NOT BE ` . - _ RD FROM THIS LOCATION P-1 0 DISTANCE FROMPHOTOGRAPH • • TO THE PROPOSED SITE IS 24001* MWN 17 N, y r, 4 low 1. �. � •�• s �• �� Ale ao - . r � }'•.;y 4 1 wry. _ .. y - .�e op �; S�� y—lam y � �1 �A .F-`i•� Y.is ` .' •y"r^i Sd' ,l �,� '� vae- i!� •� Lf.�}� ` �{ '.tee. - -- J �� � 1 t _�..� -� .. '�`:.S _ • i `,,r.t a� gar 7 }_=`� �r .�• 'L �S�1. ;''5 .f r �� •�'�,� t yea'•�t. . 1 `� - - i _• r_ . TECTONIC . . FROM _ROPOSED FACILITY%NILL _ RDISTANCE FROM THE D. . . THE PROPOSED SITE IS 2200-t A �' 1 i .DIY _ F _•' �- - � -� ,� i kv n, �. lip •�/.{el - _� Lam. ;w r ��•'i':r •W IL - ," ,�` "' : ''�•` - _ ', '-fir. .-" ;��%�, ,� '. -_ �; � �'�' •1 Al Losr�� w f� '�•'v ���.,�+�'..�'fA �"rte F*� �j`i � .r;� �� r.` -•�. � ~�• ' : - • = -TECTON1 ' PROPOSEDVISIBLE . . . _ LOCATION . THE PROPOSED SITE IS 22oo,* 6666.PURC2 'RY w� r Mesa"am LOOKING SE FROM INTERSECTION OF BELLEFAIR RD.AND FELLOWSHIP LN. PROPOSED FACILITY WILL NOT BE VISIBLE FROM THIS LOCATION P-12 DISTANCE FROM THE PHOTOGRAPH LOCATION TO THE PROPOSED SITE IS 260011 Practical Sclutims,Exceptionat ServiEe 6666.PURC2 EXHIBIT 3 RF Report it �V-11wireless Vmftn V kwilss 4 dentercw*Road West t+ Uk,W IOM MUMMMANDOONEMEMAL t'horm 914 714.7000 March 25,2015 To whom it may concern; Verizon Wireless seep to locate a facility("Facility") on the roof of an existing building at the Doral Arrowwood complex on Anderson Hill Road,Rye Brook,New York,The Facility is needed to provide capacity relief to some Verizon Wireless sites in tae vicinity,primarily the sites on King Street (Village Hall) and at Purchase College, which are anticipated to exhaust their capacity within the next 6 to 24 months. All cell sites have capacity/usage limitations, once those limitations are met or exceeded,a new site is required to provide viable service to the area. There arm two basic Key Performance Indicators(M)used to determine if a site is experiencing capacity limitations. They are 1) Average Scheduled Eligibility Were (ASM and 2)Forward Data Volume(FDV). The Scheduler(where ASBU resides)is eifeCtively the brains of a cell site and is used to determine what users can send data and when it can be sent.If the ASEU is too high the scheduler becomes overloaded and no new users can join the system and current users will wgxdenoe data blocking and/or losMopped calls. FDV is the amount of data a call site can ' provide before users start to experic mee poor data throughputs.Verizon Vrnvlem keeps a close eye on these and otherparameters and whenit looks thetrend is to exceed the hinitwe look for capacity relief solutions.The attacbed charts show the anticipated exhaustpoints for the FDV(on the left) and.ASHU(on the right). As can be seen on the charts,the FDV far each site is anticipated to reach capacity later this year,causing a slowdown or inability to access data fiom those saes,and the ASBU for each site is anticipated to reach capacity shortly thereafter. n The Facility will pmvide impmediate capacity relief for Veri= Wireless' sitea, providing the residearts in that an ofRye Book reliable and consistent access to Vmrxizon Wireless'services. Resp y submitted, t t w Ali Afjibori PJ&d fiUegaermcy engineer employed by New York SMSA Lmnted Partnership d/b/a Vm izon Wireless r I i i S Demand Projection Out to EoY 2018 Site : 78244 (Purchase College) Site Projected To Partially Exhaust in September 2015 and totally in May 2017 ENODEB: 78244-1-1 1/1/2015 1/1/2016 1/1/'20 _1/1(2018 /1/2015 1/1016 1/1017 1/1/2018 Exhaust Points Confidential and proprietarymaterials for authorized Verizon personnel and outside agencies only.Use,disclosure or distribution of this material is not permitted to any unauthorized persons or third parties except by written agreement 3 Demand Projection Out to EoY 2018 Site : 78175 (King Street) Site Projected To Partially Exhaust in June 2015 and Totally Exhaust in June 2016 ENODEB: 78175-1-1 y err 1/1/2015 1/1/2016 111 1/112018 1/1/2015 1/1/2016 111/2017 1/1/2018 Exhaust Points Confidential and proprietary materials for authorized Verizon personnel and outside agencies only.Use,disclosure or distribution of this material is not permitted to any unauthorized persons or third parties except by written agreement 4 EXHIBIT 4 Submission to Westchester County Airport LAW OFFICES OF SNYDER & SNYDER, LLP 94 WHITE PLAINS ROAD NEW YORK OFFICE TARRYTOWN, NEW YORK 10591 NEW JERSEY OFFICE 445 PARK AVENUE,STH FLOOR (914)333-0700 ONE GATEWAY CENTER,SUITE 2600 NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10022 NEWARK,NEW JERSEY 07102 (212)749-1448 FAX(914) 333-0743 (973)824-9772 FAX(212)932-2893 FAX(973)824-9774 WRITER'S E-MAIL ADDRESS LESLIE J.SNYDER REPLY TO: ROBERT D.GAUDIOSO lsnyda@snyderlaw.net DAVID L.SNYDER Tarrytown Office (1956-2012) March 17,2015 Mr.Peter Scherrer,Manager Westchester County Airport 240 Airport Road, Suite 202 White Plains,NY 10604 RE: New York SMSA Limited Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless Proposed Public Utility Wireless Telecommunications Facility On the Doral Arrowwood Hotel located at 965 Anderson Hill Road,Rye Brook.NY Dear Mr. Scherrer: I am the attorney for New York SMSA Limited Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless ("Verizon Wireless") in connection with its installation of a public utility wireless telecommunications facility ("Facility") at the captioned property ("Property'). The Facility is proposed on the roof of the hotel/conference center known as the Doral Arrowwood (`Building"), and the plans depicting same are enclosed for your reference. Due to the Property's proximity to the airport, the Village of Rye Brook Planning Board requested that we send to you the plans and request confirmation that the Facility does not require FAA or other airport clearance. Verizon Wireless' regulatory team has determined that no FAA registration is required since the existing lightning pole on the Property is at a height of 74'-0"+/-above ground " level, and the height of the Facility will extend to approximately 84'-6" +/- above ground level, less than 20 feet from the height of the existing lightning pole. In connection with the foregoing, I have attached the TOWAIR determination indicating that the Facility does not require registration and some other documentation also indicating that no FAA Notice is required. In connection with the foregoing, kindly sign below to acknowledge that the Westchester County Airport does not have any objection to Verizon Wireless' facility, and return same to me via email at lsnyder(a)snyderlaw.net or in the enclosed envelope on or before March 25,2015. Mr. Scherrer Page 2 If you have any questions or require further documentation, please feel free to contact me or Michael Sheridan at(914)333-0700. Thank you for your assistance. Resp submitted, li . 4er NO OBJECTION TO VERIZON WIRELESS FACILITY ACKNOWLEDGED: Westchester County Airport By: Peter Scherrer,Manager LJS:erW Enclosures cc: Rye Brook Planning Board Mike Musso Verizon Wireless Z:%SDATA%WPDATA\SS41WP1NEWBANMMKE BONHOMM"URCHASE ZZOMNMWCAMPORTUSITRRTF 3M3015 TOWAIR Su rch Resdts TOWAIR Determination Results *** NOTICE *** TOWAIR's findings are not definitive or binding,and we cannot guarantee that the data in TOWAIR are fully current and accurate. In some Instances,TOWAIR may yield results that differ from application of the criteria set out in 47 C.F.R. Section 17.7 and 14 C.F.R. Section 77.13.A positive finding by TOWAIR recommending notification should be given considerable weight.On the other hand,a finding by TOWAIR recommending either for or against notification Is not conclusive. It is the responsibility of each ASR participant to exercise due diligence to determine if It must coordinate its structure with the FAA.TOWAIR is only one tool designed to assist ASR participants in exercising this due diligence,and further Investigation may be neoessary to determine if FAA coordination Is appropriate. 'DETERMINATION ' ' - Structure does not require registration. The structure meets the 6.10-meter (20- 'foot) Rule criteria, NAD83 Coordinates Latitude 41-02-44.7 north Longitude 073-41-20.1 west Measurements (Meters) Overall Structure Height (AGC) 25.6 'Support Structure Height (AGC} .22.6 Site Elevation (AMSC) 87.5 Structure Type BTWR- Budding with Tower l _ _ I Tower Construct-ion Notifications Notify Tribes and Historic Preservation Officers of your plans to build a tower. hripJfwireless2.foe.govNlsWAsrSearchRo"rResultjsp7prinNUe 1l1 SITE.SRP (3),txt Federal Airways & Airspace * summary Report: Alteration Of Existing Structure * Non-Antenna Structure Airspace user: Candice Koenig File: SITE Location: Rye Brook, NY Latitude: 41*-02'-44.7" Longitude: 73'41'-20.1" SITE ELEVATION AMSL. .....288 ft. STRUCTURE HEIGHT.. ..... ..84 ft. OVERALL HEIGHT AMSL. .. ...372 ft. NOTICE CRITERIA FAR 77.9(a): NNR (ONE 200 ft AGL) FAR 77.9 b): NNR (DNE Notice Slope) FAR 77.9(c): NNR (Not a Traverse way) FAR 77.9: NNR FAR 77.9 IFR Straivht-In Notice Criteria for HPN FAR 77.9: NNR (No Expected TERPS impact 7N3) FAR 77.9(d): NNR (Off Airport Construction) NR = Notice Required NNR = Notice Not Required PNR = Possible Notice Required (depends upon actual IFR procedure) For new construction review Air Navigation Facilities at bottom of this report. If the proposed construction is an alteration to an existing structure notice requirements may be superceded by the item exemptions listed below. The location and analysis were based upon an existing structure. However, no existing aeronautical study number was identified. If the 'existin ' structure penetrates an obstruction surface defined by CFR 77.17, 77: 9. 77.21 or 77.23 (see below) it is strongly recommended the FAA be notified of the 'existing' structure to determine obstruction marking or lightingq requirements. it is not uncommon for the FAA to issue a Determination of No Hazard (DNH) for an existing structure and modify the airspace to accommodate the structure, should that be required. If the FAA issues a DNH enter the aeronautical study number (ASN) in the space provided on the Airspace Analysis window Form and re-run Airspace. No frequencies were identified in this alteration are included in the FAA's Co-Location Policy published in the Federal RegisterNovember 15, 2007. Therefore, application of the Co-Location Policy notice exemption rule can not be applied. Title 14 CFR Part 77.9(e), Notice Criteria Exception: The location and analysis were based upon an existing structure with the alteration limited to the addition of an antenna with a height no greater than 20 feet. Title 14 CFR Part 77.9( in exempts therequirement for notice to the FAA; "Any antenna structure o 20 feet or less n height except one that would increase the height of another antenna structure. If the addition of an antenna of 20 feet or less to an existing structure increase the height of the structure to exceed 200 feet AGL or penetrate an obstruction surface This defined by Title 14 CFR 77.17, 77.19, 77.21 or 77.23 notice is recommended. will allow the FAA to determine the level of obstruction lighting required and Page 1 SITE.SRP (3).txt any aeronautical impacts, if any, to aircraft operations. Notice of an existing structure almost always receives a No Hazard Determination. Please see Summary Report below plus the Airport and Part 77 Reports for application of the above listed CFRS. OBSTRUCTION STANDARDS FAR 77.17(a)(1): DNE 499 ft AGL FAR 77.17(a)(2): ONE - Airport Surface FAR 77.19(a): DNE - Horizontal surface FAR 77.19(b): ONE - Conical surface FAR 77.19(c): ONE - Primary Surface FAR 77.19(d): DNE - Approach Surface FAR 77.19e): DNE - Transitional Surface VFR TRAFFIC PATTERN AIRSPACE FOR: HPN: WESTCHESTER COUNTY Type: A RD: 6230.188 RE: 379.8 FAR 77.17(a)(1): DNE FAR 77.17(a)(2): DNE - Height No Greater Than 200 feet AGL. VFR Horizontal surface: DNE VFR Conical surface: DNE VFR Approach Slope: DNE VFR Transitional Slope: DNE The structure is within VFR - Traffic Pattern Airspace Climb/Descent Area. Structures exceeding the greater of 350' AAE, 77.17(a)(2) or VFR horizontal and conical surfaces will receive a hazard determination from the FAA. Maximum AMSL of climb/Descent Area is 789 feet. VFR TRAFFIC PATTERN AIRSPACE FOR: 7N3: SANDS POINT Type: S RD: 76750.56 RE: 6.6 FAR 77.17(a)(1): DNE FAR 77.17(a)(2)• DNE Greater Than 5.99 NM. VFR Horizontal surface: DNE VFR Conical surface: ONE VFR Approach Slope: ONE VFR Transitional Slope: DNE TERPS DEPARTURE PROCEDURE (FAA Order 8260.3, Volume 4) FAR 77.17(a)(3) Departure Surface Criteria (40:1) DNE Departure Surface MINIMUM OBSTACLE CLEARANCE ALTITUDE (MOCA) FAR 77.17(a)(4) MOCA Altitude Enroute Criteria The Maximum Height Permitted is 1359 ft AMSL PRIVATE LANDING FACILITIES FACIL BEARING RANGE DELTA ARP FAA IDENT TYP NAME To FACIL IN NM ELEVATION IFR ----- --- ----------------------------- -------- ----- --------- --- NK84 HEL SAFE FLIGHT INSTRUMENT CORP. 332.41 2.39 -43 No Impact to Private Landing Facility Structure 0 ft below heliport. ONK7 HEL KING STREET 333.63 3.8 -98 No Impact to Private Landing Facility structure 3 ft below heliport. 7NK8 HEL WESTCHESTER MEDICAL CENTER 292.88 5.63 -37 No Impact to Private Landing Facility Page 2 SITE.SRP (3).txt Structure 0 ft below heliport. AIR NAVIGATION ELECTRONIC FACILITIES FAC ST DIST DELTA GRND APCH IDNT TYPE AT FREQ VECTOR (ft) ELEVA ST LOCATION ANGLE BEAR ---- ---------- -- ------ ------ ------ ----- -- ----------------- ------- HPN LOCALIZER U 109.7 325.82 5236 -1 NY RWY 16 WESTCHESTE -.01 162 HPN ATCT ON 314.21 8753 -149 NY WESTCHESTER COUNT -.98 HPN CO Y A/G 308.06 9048 -112 NY WESCHESTER COUNTY -.71 HPN RADAR ON 2735. 323.46 12246 -138 NY WESTCHESTER COUNT -.65 No Impact. For Alteration EMI Notice is not required. The studied location is within 5 NM of a Radar facility. The calculated Radar Line-Of-Sight (Los) distance is: 51 NM. This location and height is within the Radar Line-of-Sight. OJZ LOCALIZER I 109.7 328.32 13357 -58 NY RWY 34 WESTCHESTE -.25 342 CMK VOR/DME I 116.6 19.1 90376 -322 NY CARMEL -.2 LGA VOR/DME R 113.1 207.42 107618 +363 NY LA GUARDIA .19 TEB VOR/DME R 108.4 235.03 125659 +369 NJ TETERBORO .17 DPK VOR/DME I 117.7 131.12 141082 +249 NY DEER PARK .10 JFK RADAR ON 2755. 188.22 149536 +285 NY JOHN F KENNEDY IN .11 JFK VOR/DME I 115.9 188.6 152140 +361 NY KENNEDY .14 BDR VOR/DME R 108.8 74.75 161102 +363 CT BRIDGEPORT .13 CRI VOR/DME R 112.3 199.75 167792 +362 NY CANARSIE .12 JFK RADAR WXL Y 05647. 197.59 174697 +248 NY FLOYD BENNETT .08 EWR RADAR Y 225.01 183968 +222 NJ NEWARK ASDE .07 ISP RADAR ON 2735. 118.19 185721 +190 NY LONG ISLAND MacAR .06 EWR RADAR ON 2715. 225.2 193157 +266 NY NEWARK INTERNATIO .08 SWF RADAR Y 2765. 324.88 198485 -349 NY STEWART INTERNATI -.1 EWR RADAR WXL Y 05620. 224.14 230299 +219 NJ WOODBRIDGE .05 OKX RADAR WXL Y 106.34 237163 +151 NY BRENTWOOD .04 CFR Title 47, §1.30000-§1.30004 AM STUDY NOT REQUIRED: Structure is not near a FCC licensed AM station. Movement Method Proof as specified in §73.151(c) is not required. Please review 'AM Station Report' for details. Nearest AM Station: WGCH 0 5183 meters. Page 3 i SITE.SRP (3).tXt Airspace° summary version 15.3.386 AIRSPACE$ and TERPS® are registered 0 trademarks of Federal Airways & Airspace• copyright 0 1989 - 2015 03-17-2015 13:12:15 Page 4 Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration-Off Airport https://oeaaa.faa.gov/oeaaa/external/eFiling/locationAction jsp?action=... Federal Av OOn a OE/AAA AdmijuelnEtian Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration-Off Airport Add anew Case Off Airport-Desk Reference Guide V_2016.1.0 Add a New Case Off Airport for Wind Turbines-Met Towers-Desk Reference Guide V2015.1.0 _......__.................. -._....._....__......_..._......._,..... Fm Project name:NEW Y-000319809-15 Sponsor. New York SMSA Limited Partnership Details for Case:Purchase 2 Show Project Summary — — I Case Status iASN: 2015-AEA-1536-OE Date Accepted: 03/23/2015 F Status: Accepted Date Determined: I Letters: None Documents: 03/23/2015 6666-P1JRC2-FAA2C-... i Public Comments: None 03/23/2015 Ems!Pages from 6666.P... 03/23/2015-M 6666,PURC2-L.F-FIN.., Project Documents: None i i I Construction/Alteration Information Structure Summary Notice Of: Construction Structure Type: Building J Duration: Permanent Structure Name: Purchase 2 3 W Temporary: Months: Days: FDC NOTAM: i Work Schedule-Start: NOTAM Number: I Work Schedule-End: FCC Number: 3 *Por temporary cranes-Does the permanent structure require separate notice to the PAA? Prior ASN: To find ouq gree the Abtke Criteria roof.V ireparste notice g requlhs4 please erasure t is fired. I tf t Is not filed,please state the reason In the Descriphon of Proposal State Filing: Structure Details Latitude- 41° 2' 43.52" N Common Frequency Bands ___.__ ........_ .......... ....__-- .......... ;Longitude: 73*41' 22.06" W Low Fraq High Freq Freq Unit ERP ERP unit 698 806 MHz 1000 W I Horizontal Datum: NAD83 806 824 MHz 500 W 3 Site Elevation(SE): 288(nearest foot) 824 849 MHz 500 W ?Structure Height(AGL): 85(nearest foot) 851 866 MHz Soo W 894 f Cancer 869 MHz 500 W Height(AGL): (nearest foot) W i ;a Por notice ofalteratlan or existing provide the current 896 901 MHz 500 GL height of the existing structure. 901 902 MHz 7 W Include details 6n the Desm(ltion of Proposal 930 931 MHz 3500 W 931 932 MHz 3500 W i Max Operating Height(AGL): (nearest foot) 932 932.5 MHz 17 dBW ' * For aeronautical studyof a cram or construction equipment 935 Sao MHz 1000 W the maximum he$hf should be feted above as the 940 941 MHz 3500 W Structure Height(AGL).Additionally,provide the maximum 1850 1910 MHz 1640 W l opemtNg height to avoid delays/impacts am identified that 1930 1990 MHz 1640 W ' require negotiation to a reduced hefgid.If the Structure Height and maxhnum operathmg height am the same enter the some 2305 2330 MHz 2000 W +value in both Rents. 2345 2360 MHz 2000 W 1 Nacelle Height(AGL): (nearest foot) Specific Frequencies * For Wind Turbines 500ftAGL orgmoter .........----.....__. ............ 1 i i Requested Marking/Lighting: None Other: I Recommended Marking/Lighting: i Current Marking/Lighting: N/A Proposed Structure Other: Nearest City: Purchase ':.Nearest State: New York Description of Location: 965 Anderson Hit Road On the Project Summary page upbsciarty certRied survey. Purchase,W 10573 i Description of Proposal. Proposed 35'flagpole to be top mounted on existing rooftop. 1 Increasing the overall AGL of this 1 building by 10' f I Previous Bart toNom Search Result -• 3/25/2015 5:35 PM NEW YORK SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP m Vd/b/a erko wireless WEST NYACK, NEW YORK PUBLIC UTILITY ATTACHED WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY 965 ANDERSON HILL ROAD RYE BROOK, NY 10573 SITE INFORMATION VW SITE TYPE NEW BUILD VW PROJECT CODE 2Mt613945 t" '''j�Y 4}� S 4 1 "• a Q( SITE DESCRIPTION: ATTACHED WIRELESS TELECGMMUIUCATIDNS .£ F �•P ' '' FACILITY:INSTALL NEW UNMANNED 9 .•, n EQUIPMENT CABINETS&POLE WITH INTERIOR 'f �• j �.'�`+ _ SIX(6)ANTENNAS WR THE EXISTING ROOFTOP t-r+:.g' - 1 -'u•; '� ✓'• AND A BACKUP GENERATOR AT TRADE , .f �.;: Pm'?.'a'•yyy s Y 4 f ' PR0.ECT LOCATION: 965 ANDERSON HILL ROAD t T J Sn.B r T - !®_ � •+e� RYE BROOK NY 10573 ` BUILDING OWNER: DORAL ARROWWOOD -- 975 ANDERSON HILL ROAD, RYE BROOK NY 10573 ` �,_ t cI1.r P SITE CONTACT: MICHAEL PARISI ems,� (914)935-8628 VW LEASING CCNTACi TECEONIC ENGINEERING&SURVEYING CONSULTANTS,P-C. DANA 587-6856BROCKLEBEX (845)587 8858 EXT.2807NF 1/// v,` }.•+•a ��'�• VW CONSTRUCTION CONTACT: CIARENCE JONES .fA.."� (645)423-3072 A/E(ENGINEER)CONTACT: Tom➢TECTONIC ENGIINEEFtING&SURVLYING CONLSULTPNTS,P.C. VICINITY MAP AREA MAP (845)567-5656 M.2511 ELECTRICAL COMPANY CONSOLIDATED EDISON CDNTACE CUSTOMER SERVICE PHONE:(60D)732-6533 TELEPHONE COMPANY VERIZON NEW YORK,WC. (845)B90-T00 LATITUDE 41'02.44.75'N(NAD 93) LONGTUDE 73.41'20.13"W(NAD 83) ELEVATION: 287-1't AMSL JURISDICTION: VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK SECTION: ,29.34 ` 0 N. , rO BLOCK: 1 v.,,ee N811]VRH aemA LOT(S): - 45 w 1-00s ZONING DISTRICT: P.U.D.-PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT towns „n,ns au.u .�aoNa�Ns a,. >m ox¢ov yac/t. aamn awuam uxwnon x+xt I 'd TIM SIM bZZ w=tn4 D m— 3629-N � 965 ANDERSON HD,L ROAD tt/aVt. r •'°' V RYE BROOK,NY 10573 ayayts D'tr 0 ESs10io x. . assns g° tv..ns "" LEGEND UST OF PROPERTY OWNERS WMiIN 250' RADIUS Ll J /l �yl ,�� BULK REQUIREMENTS / C ✓ � � 1�\ GENERAL NOTES IV- -� ism --J I VA I A�Js �4 NE PLANa „ins � � _ '�.� ;� "�^a,_.-.,oa ..:>"�,• , ®llm— „",/„ m wn' LAN.SrMACB MAP&ND76S 09362 , P� s as/z,/,• o F,;,,, �� 986 ANDffi90N HN,L RAAD „ww+, .�,,,, OF S RYE sxooa,NY 10673 e ,s sw o Ssse.Pu3ca -1 B N u i .� xnaQ r-- ------ Sim MWAN , C ' i 1 _ o v amx WN,arim 9 _ ❑❑❑ --- ------------------------------- SffE DETAIL PLAN eF m i� �m rox• „moo ,a. ��— _____________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________________ 4____________________ n n AIM, n u �� n m�xm OF N E W YO PARTIALELEVATION �. w wa p..e.I,w... DEPAII.PLAN&ELEVATION..a f �• re...v we..,a 9 �/ n85 ANDERSON RD,L ROAD ZZ ,rov+. 93629 QY MBROOK,m IoSva A OFESS e oyzu/,s � O�meYeb BBBB.PORC2 A—Z 8 ® ❑ i ,I am vrarrz raa My /��,�� it ❑ �,�, e I--�— I I w _ � mr onrxg anm ia•.au•ro rav ca em,:akm � I t� iuoe�•�i.mea C� i � � I I �au�au`� p�1ao��e•ue„eu® catt a ------------ � _ � I w�w Z,J �i � ver qwx wx rax I�uow aw�eo w1nm xon v„u ro�rro I ma a onnxur„cma �i �,awv,ra. u I �s�swia I msr.=mx exn,n �r oxmur(,rVj I� _ amrox�a, aarram,„aa,�„,ama m ' I I VIJ 13 13 t- .�ara®m� �,rA�roLL baa,v vuy x"'r/uuromx r�cunm m/ I am-r..s,sa Ixry I ' f 1 C-1 GENERATOR DETAIL PLAN ream m.e.mm. s`omoivaxo m1°r"'R0YR9 �F NEW YO --- - N. IAS/ 4� W DETAIL PIAN wax a axn� a Wx/+, e Wa/+� anm o�,„ a 629 Qv 986 ANDB990N IDLL ROAD R0� _OF AN „pa. •� R p RYS 8R00$NY 10679 WY°/'s O m,a..em 8866.PURC2 A-1 8 r=1 nn 6 N � � Vmva�Y®m �� aP� ms ® NOTICE ® sx.� 2�Hssa15 t®¢ sue 1-800-852-2671 �m ff r+:sm.=.w.xvr aa��sawus. � w mavas wsm�mupuvs. .R x.•s.a .R gar:.n x+.xwte wr w�nu�a na xmiax°r�x'w"E°�"�snarnw '° RF NOTICE 51@! �E11FRfFxlLY 9GN SIGDETAILSANTTAI ENNA PLANS ANTENNA DEL -r 1%'wR O'a✓fB,u.NrutW _ TBT¢ )iYE N IP&'WIi y YYY [wr m mvn tExuiq(,m) �x x� ew g pm pu+wIX mnm� .wwuum yp�p:� $ (cvs-mv'�ao-p M+B I xo�wuximmputmm/v 7E °xez,�wv nmttn; /I I II a mqao+t �esm .°1E1.wiH19svuu�p�°Em�uicxsx°'E m�v a�woq GPS MOUNTING DETAIL x6 RRCJ °� m» § u,scu m�>'i vsxwe �RRH &JUNCTION BOX MOUNTING DETAIL H L�KmxION �pG SIDE TELEVATI0N WR IA ss xsxwxm�,wsx Nr_sw.sRswo Nxe �,v,w,s tax j.�,:a.: � ..,•.,".,vim.«.L �•>�,°n CONDUIT DETAIL nv+= _ jo��-- — cry DETADs 3629, p 906 ANDERSON I=ROAD RQ 14I RYE BR00$NY 10573 p BBBB.PDRC2 A-3 8 Memo Date: Wednesday, April 01, 2015 Project: Village of Rye Brook, Verizon (Doral Arrowwood Hotel) To: Mayor Paul Rosenberg and Members of the Board of Trustees; Chairman Gary Zuckerman and Members of the Planning Board From: Michael P. Musso, P.E. (HDR) Subject: Supplemental Tech Memo On March 27, 2015, HDR received supplemental application information regarding the above- referenced project. The supplemental information was prepared by Verizon and submitted to respond to both F.P. Clark Associates' comments and comments included in HDR's technical review memo (dated 3-12-2015), which were discussed at the March 12, 2015 Planning Board meeting. HDR reviewed the new information and has prepared this correspondence to supplement our original review memo. Additional information provided by the applicant in response to F.P. Clark's comments was not reviewed by HDR. HDR recommended that the proposed screening wall be extended to include the east side of the rooftop equipment platform. As noted in the supplemental information, the applicant now proposes to install cream-colored vinyl siding on all four sides of the platform, as shown on the revised Drawing A-2 (dated 3-20-15). There is no need to color-match any of the platform- based equipment, as it will now be surrounded by the screening wall on all sides. It should be noted that a canopy over the equipment area was proposed in the original application materials; the new drawings depict the canopy more clearly (shaded in green). Recommendations made prior for color-matching of conduit / utility runs located outside of the platform area are still relevant. Capacity trend information' for nearby existing Verizon sites was furnished with the supplemental submittal (as requested). According to the information provided, the on air Verizon King Street site (Village Hall) is expected to reach or near its capacity limits for one KPI around June 2015, and the Purchase College on air site around September 2015. The proposed Verizon site will supplement coverage for the area and provide necessary capacity relief for the existing nearby Verizon cell sites. HDR recommended outreach by the applicant regarding Westchester County Airport / Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) notifications that may be required. Snyder & Snyder submitted a letter with project details to the Airport on March 17, 2015. Airport representatives reportedly directed the applicant to provide a formal notification to the FAA. In turn, a FAA notification was submitted by the applicant on March 23, 2015; a response is pending at this time. Copies of the 1 Including key performance indicators (KPIs)of Average Scheduled Eligibility Users (ASEU) and Forward Data Volume (FDV), used to evaluate the capacity of a cell site or local network to provide reliable service. 1 recent correspondence and FAA notification were provided with the supplemental information materials and reviewed by HDR. The applicant's FAA notification identified a site elevation of 288 ft and structure height of 85 feet above grade, which matches application materials (rounded up to the nearest ft). The applicant should track all FAA determinations / correspondences, and any follow-up correspondences with the Westchester County Airport, and report back to the Village of Rye Brook with any new information. The Village can consider making the pending FAA `approval' (i.e., a determination of `No Hazard to Air Navigation') and endorsement by the Westchester County Airport a condition of approval to be provided prior to issuance of a Building Permit. HDR notes that the Westchester County Airport may defer determination to the FAA, and it is possible that no further comment will be furnished by the Airport. It is also noted that the applicant is responsible for the accuracy of survey and site- specific information that is presented to the FAA, and for the follow-up on the determination. The responses provided by the applicant in the March 27, 2015 supplemental information submittal appear to be responsive to HDR's comments. As noted in HDR's original technical review memo, a complete structural analysis can be completed as a condition of approval (during the Building Permit stage of the project). The original (3-12-2015) HDR memo also includes additional recommendations. Please contact me if additional information is required. 2 JFM Architect Joe Mansfield, Registered Architect P.O. Box 381 Brewster, New York lo5og 845-259-3801 www.jftnarchitect.com March 26, 2015 Mr. Michal J. Nowak Superintendent of Public Works Village of Rye Brook 938 King Street Rye Brook, N.Y. 10573 Rc: Haney Existing Two-Family Dwelling--Tax Map No.: 141,27-1-50 525 Ellendale Avenue Rye Brook,New York 10.573 (Village of Rye Brook) Owner: Julia Haney and Marianna Knowles Applicant: Julia Haney Dear Mr. Nowak, The above referenced dwelling was existing when the current owners' grandmother arrived from Italy circa 1908. At that time it was owned by the grandmother's aunt and uncle as an existing two-family home. And, it has been owned by the family as an existing two-family home since that time. The Village of Rye Brook records specify this dwelling is a one-family dwelling. The current owner desires to legalize this two-family dwelling for the Village records. This dwelling will remain as it currently exists with no modifications or improvements. Since no construction or development is proposed, we respectfully request a waiver of the following Site Plan Application requirements: • Topographic survey (no proposed changes to the existing buildings or property) • Copy Town of Rye Tax Assessor's Card(Tax Map No. obtained from Village) • Copy of Deed • Location map • Request for all studies(ie. Environmental,wildlife, traffic, stormwater,etc.) Please call me if you have any questions. Sincerely, c:6- T1,40, 1z.a- Joe Mansfield, R.A. BUIL MENT VI K 938 KING NY 10573 (914)9 39-5801 a FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: BOT Approval Date: PB Approval Date: BOT Disapproval Date: PB Disapproval Date: Chairman: AUnch Resolution. BOT[ ] PBA[ ] ZBA j ] SITE PLAN APPLICA TION SUBMISSION OF APPLICATION DOES NOT ASSURE PLACEMENT ON ANY PLANNING BOARD AGENDA. APPLICANT WILL BE NOTIFIED OF SUCH PLACEMENT. APPENDIX: THIS SITE PLAN APPLICATION REFERENCES BUT 1S NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING CODE SECTIONS OF THE VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK; SECTIONS: 250 ZONING, 209 SITE PLAN REVIEW, 235 TREES, 107 DEMOLITION OF BUILDINGS,2.24 SWIMMING POOLS, 121 EXCAVATION&TOPSOIL REMOVAL, 1 18 EROSION&SEDIMENT CONTROL,213 STEEP SLOPES PROTECTION, 219 SUBDIVISION OF LAND, 250-40 NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS. DESIGN PROFESSIONALS&APPLICANTS ARE STRONGLY ENCOURAGED TO REVIEW THE ABOVE MENTIONED CODE SECTIONS, AVAILABLE ONLINE AT www.ryebrook.ar-g PRIOR TO COMPLETING THIS APPLICATION. SITE PLAN: Identification of Applicant: S u L1 A V.AA6'1 (o w m a 11-) ---_ Z cn ~ oa 3Z mr l. Owner: 3 u L.% A Jk AN 1-A Amb MAV-1,AN NA �a-US tl. u�R�e�+rt•6 lraa� --(g ga y` , Address! j Ar C-LAF-V-'Sat-k g-o Ao -E-mail: J V�Ln�S. HAW E-Y& 44M At L .001-1 Tel.#:_ ." CAS `�• l0 5 i 2 . 1'JF+ti1. iD S 8 02, 1 Applicant: .,o Lt A lA A kralIA GC.A 1'-•S n N A'1D Address: sL- tin, 1051-z E-Mail: Js Le S. la Av C e &1hA m.-co n aW Tel.#: i3-A,;) Z28 ' -q So 4 _ Fes:LE��. . 1}aS) 13b?, , �' ,._.. .—._..._ Design Professional: .jc>E tAAj4Sf.ELV, Ap=blt'iccr-( bgA JFM 11Et7i�L� 1'o. b or. 3 l B#-c�.�Z�;-j rvy• l o oq Joe @ JF 1z-`- � .Z. C.o^i Address: E-mail: _ M A Nl?�G Tel.#: S) 259- 38o1 _..,. .,..._..---Eag' ems-:(2101 8LZ --3935 Designate to whom correspondence is to be sent: lure M Aa5 Et i� �'►1GL'I Note: If applicant is a"Contract Vendee", please attach a copy of the contract summary with financial and confidential terms deleted. IDENTIFICATION OF PROPERTY: A. Identifying Title: 52S eLLeM IDAt-C AVCav 1Anrg`1 -'61�t3��tsl. "'- FAna.t.LI B. Tax Designation: Section: 1+I• 'L1 Block: l Lot: SD 'Dam LL I,A J C. Zoning District:__-2 , 7"o- FAtU% l-y t2-c 5 i Q C,*'i i n L D. Street which property abuts: �-%--L-f-r,[ B ALE Av r-aM E. Does property connect directly into State or County highway? Ho LAST REVISED 7.13 F. Is site within 500 feet of Village Boundary?_§,5 If yes note all bordering municipalities: V t t. A`e op ry ft-,( G1�E 516 G. Total area of site. -1}rpo(o s 1 D,,13 Z AL.Area of site activity: Zrc pyo 5.F. H. Site coverage: +8.CQ %; Building coverage: V0.1 % p�na�/r t�a.+�llA--� NO^r G'"'�`a�'q'"'f" D�.►ce�.jia�w►W� t4bn000, 1. Existing building size:-W V x hj6'-q�b New/additional building size 0.&Ae T Existing parking spaces `4 New parking spaces K. Nature of proposed activity: i.6Ga Ltz4t TAe bwF-"%A cq APPLICATION FEES: Application fees are non-refundable. Environmental Fees and Site Plan Fees must be paid on separate checks. Make checks payable to the: Village of Rye Brook. Residential Dwellings $300 plus- $200 per additional unit Non-Residential $450 plus- $30 per parking space Planned Unit Development $500 per acre PUD Amendment $250 Site Plan Amendment $550 Wetlands& Watercourse $1,100 Consultant Review (Environmental) Fee: Minimum fee $250 - maximum fee $2,500 estimated. Applicant's Environmental Account most have a positive balance at all times prior to any Consultant,Attorney,Village, and Board review. SITE PLAN FEE: nuc DATE PAID: ENVIRONMENTAL FEE: 1,o e o DATE PAID: Please note that this application must include the notarized signature(s)of the legal owners)of the above-mentioned property, In the space provided below. Any application not bearing the legal property owner's notarized signature(s)shall be deemed null and void,and will be returned to the applicant. STATE OF NEW YORK,COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER ) as: ( 1v ,being duly sworn,deposes and states that he/she is the applicant above named, (print name of individual signing)&the applicant) and further states tha (s)hc is the legal owner of the property to which this application pertains, or that (s)he is the Cc, for the legal owner and is duly authorized to make and file this application, (inthcate archi[ect,emtradar,agent,attorney,rte_) That all statements contained herein are true to the best of his/her knowledge and belief,and that any work performed,or use conducted at the above captioned property will be in conformance with the details as set forth and contained in this application and in any accompanying approved plans and specifications,as well as in accordance with the New York State Uniform Fire Prevention &Building Code,the Code of the Village of Rye Brook and all other applicable laws,ordinances and regulations. Sworn to before me this Z ti4' Sworn to before-me this Z day of WNGINCV, , 20 15- day of W\a�C V, , 20 c N�\� WNDO 1 `r Notary P bliUA c ° u my PUBLIC STATE OF NEW otH1 y P llc QUALIFIeD IN PUTW WI COUNI�1 f Pro a Owner t p MrcortM. t tore of Applicant VJUfl �C : Llh,v Print Nacre of Property Owne Print Name of Applicant / LAST REVISED 7.13 �y DRC�V� VILLA - OOK 938 King S :I� .Y. 10573 (914)83 ?` 39-5801 1982 SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REVIEW CHECKLIST This form shall serve as a checklist for site plan submittal and review by the Village of Rye Brook The use of this plan review checklist by the applicant is to ensure compliance with the technical provisions of The Village of Rye Brook Site Plan Code, Section 209, pertaining to preliminary and final plan preparation. The Village of Rye Brook Site Plan Code is available at The Village of Rye Brook Building Department or to download at: v►ww.ryebrook.org SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL_$_HALL INCLUDE: 1. APPLICATIONS. Completed and signed including correspondences. 2. CHECKLIST. Completed and signed. 3. PLANS. Signed, Sealed & Dated. Fifteen paper (15) copies or twenty (20) copies when Board of Trustees approval is required and out (1) electronic version. One (1) record set with original signatures, dates and seals may be provided and submitted with fourteen(14)copies or nineteen(19) copies that clearly indicate the signatures, dates, and seals shown on the record set. 4. FEES: All application fees and Environmental fee. A separate check for filing fee and Environmental fee. 5. Environmental Form. Short or Long Form(contact office)completed. 5. Electronic Copy. Complete copy of all plans and shall be submitted electronically at time of submission. 7. Prior to the appearance before ANY meeting or hearing of the Planning Board, the applicant thrust comply ` all No9fitation equirements of Code Section 2.50-40. 1 (APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE) have read the No i cation Requirements 6f Code Section 250-40 and will provide notification as required. IDENTIFICATION OF APPLICANT(SZ: Identification of Applicant: Jy L1 A �A rA" (ow w oy-) Applicant: J u LLA VkAwG Address: Ro A n JA" LA Tel. #: (84S) 2Z8 -4 v*.x '(Di-Q663- —E-Mail,- .1V4.1 5. L4atjj (2 (,nrtAtL. . tp� Project Name: 525 51-L'6" k;4Lz AvEuHE �1Anf-y -PV 15 IA(- Two- Fr►••,ia +� Project Address: 525 i✓LtE*,bP Le by Enc V C Current Property Owner: J v 1-t A JAAjyj5n AO1D A A t3 kN o W LE S 12A �taKESu a 6 LA"E � CA -V-SoA PAO L.rticct �R^�nL �'? LoS12 L604S �Lty tPA• w41S Tel. #: AS) NIX 1 %S1 -0032 Address', _ 228- So4lJp�•�dl -Mail, . µ�lt'�►E �GAtiA�L , coy.. IDENTIFICATION OF PROPERTY: Identifying Title: S 25 E.1.1.f g b A LE Nuc v U6 (1(4 d -EVA0 rr l b Two Tax Designation: Section: 1 1.2A Block-._L__Lot: 50 Zoning District: F7-z' -two" FA-"06 Street which property abuts: EL�%-6 N lel AL.e Ave-N,116 o Less to L Plan Submission Date: 2-4 , ZO {S Site Plan Checklist Page 1 of 7 pr,�e,t Address S 2S 11E L L*u GALE AVI V N NA PLANREQUIREMENTS 000 15-20 copies of plans prepared and signed by a registered land Surveyor,Engineer or Architect- * 00 One(t)electronic copy of all submitted plans. W O O ® Topographic Survey stamped by New York State Land Surveyor with license number and seal. W O O • Topographic survey scale of one(1)inch per twenty(20)feet or larger. W O O • Section, block and lot numbers of the property taken from the latest tax records along with a copy of the most recent property card on file with the Town of Rye Tax Assessor's office. O O 0 Name of the proposed subdivision plan. A O O Name and address of the owner of record. • O O Name and address of the applicant. yJ O O • Deed reference(s). A O O Names, addresses and signature of every Engineer, Architect, Land Surveyor or Soil Scientist whose professional seal appears on any site plan submitted to the Board. A O O North arrow and scale. W O O e Location map at the minimum scale of 1"equals 1,000 feet. • O O Area of all lots,in square feet. O O • Engineering notes on plans as stated in application packages. O O • Copies of all existing and proposed deed restrictions or covenants applying to the property, including, but not limited to, covenants and agreements restricting the use and establishing future ownership and maintenance responsibilities for all private roads,recreation,and open space areas. O O q Any prior land use approvals with respect to the subject property. 000 Date the plans were first drafted. Any revision(s)made to any of the sheets first submitted are to be so noted in the revision block.. The revision block is to be placed on the originals of the revised sheets. Additional paper copies are to be made& submitted for the Planning Board&Building Dept.to replace those sheets previously submitted. 000 Other existing site improvements,including,but not limited to,fences,landscape or retaining walls, landscaping & screening. 000 Location of all buildings and structures on the premises and approximate location of all neighboring,buildings or structures within 100 feet of the lot line. • O O Fees paid to The Wage of Rye Brook building Department. • O O Any revisions to plans shall be identified with a revision cloud and numbered revision triangle Y N NA ABUTTE W PROPERTYMFORMATION A O O The names and addresses of all abutting property owners within 250 ft as indicated in the Municipal records. A O O Zoning and use of abutting properties noted on plans. • O O Shape,size,height and location of existing buildings and driveways within one hundred(100)feet of the site. O O • Location and description of existing easements within one hundred(100)feet of the site- 0 O • Location of existing private or public trails within one hundred(100)feet of the site. O O • Location of existing roads,scenic roads and/or driveways within two hundred(200)feet of the site. O O A Location of proposed parkland. If none state nearest recreation facility O O • Location of existing septic system leach fields within two hundred(200)feet of the site. O O • Locations,dimensions,grades and flow direction of existing sewers,culverts,waterlines as well as other underground utilities within and adjacent to the property. Site Plan Checklist Page 2 of7 project Address 5Z5 ELl.clu PALO Aumde 000 The location of all existing watercourses,intermittent streams,wetland areas and springs,consistent with the definitions set forth in Chapter 245, Wetlands and Watercourses,of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook. Y N NA PROPOSED SITE PLAN MEQg ATION A O O Sufficient, acceptable information to readily determine the location, hearing, and length of every street line, lot line, and property boundary line. • O O Location of all building setback lines. (a O O 0 Topographic data at a minimum contour interval of 2'-0"increments,showing existing and proposed contours on the property and extending a minimum of 25 feet into al I adjacent properties. 600 The location and characteristics of the different areas of vegetation, including the identification of all individual trees 12 or more inches in diameter at breast height("DBH"), protected trees of any size, as well as stands of trees and wooded areas, within areas of proposed disturbance,consistent with the provisions of Chapter 235, Trees, of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook. 000 location and proposed development of all buffer areas,including existing vegetative cover. 000 Location and description of any zoning district and municipal boundaries including a zoning compliance chart for the existing and proposed lots. • O O Shape,size,height and location of all existing and proposed buildings- 0 O ® Location and description of any existing and proposed easements. O O • Location and dimensions of all existing and proposed streets,driveways,sidewalks,parking spaces,bicycle parking, loading areas and other facilities associated with the proposed use. O O • Identification of the location and amount of building area proposed for retail sales or similar commercial activity. • O O Location of existing and proposed utilities(water,sewer,gas,electrical,telephone,oil tank etc.). O O 0 Design and location of all existing and proposed wells,septic tanks and leach field systems,or methods of waste water disposal. O O • Location,type and size of all existing and proposed landscaping and screening including fences and walls. O O • Location, size and proposed screening of outdoor storage areas, if any. } bol s FIO"o 1,50 O O 9 Location, design and construction material of all existing or proposed site improvements, including drains, culverts, retaining walls,landscape walls and fences. tAo.&L p 06p s��b O O 8 Exterior lighting plan and proposed signs to be located on site,including sign orientation,size,height,and elevation view. O O • Storm drainage plan and plans for snow removal and storage. t4.ua PPI091 j[rb O O • Pedestrian and automobile circulation plan. O O A Construction drawings for pavements,walks,steps,curbing,drainage&other structures associated with the proposed use. O O • Erosion and sedimentation control plan,including installation details of proposed control measures,directive construction notations and a schedule for the installation and maintenance of proposed control measure. O O A Description of measures planned to assure proper erosion and sedimentation control m accordance with the requirements of Chapter 118 entitled"Erosion and Sediment Control,"of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook. 6rti st tea ik T"o KMO" O O 0 Drawing and computation for storm water detention design for a 25-year storm in accordance with the Westchester County Best Management Practices O O • Rock outcroppings and areas of steep slope consistent with the definitions set forth in Chapter 213,Steep Slope Protection, of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook. O O * Location of any common lands and/or public lands. O O A Phasing or an estimated project construction schedule. O O i Supporting documents,including deeds,maintenance,condominium agreements,etc. Site Plan Checklist Page 3 of 7 Project Address 52S Cu-EN tad W Ay>?iwt 0041 Location of proposed construction or area of disturbance and its relationship to any property line, easement, building, structure, road, wall, fence, sewage disposal system, well, wetland feature or tree exceeding six inches in diameter measured at a height of four feet from the ground lag, COAS-1p o,to A p#*114 vd W 000 Estimate of earthwork showing the quantity of any material to be imported to and/or removed from the site including a chart with the number/species and size of any trees to be removed. Olathe P H f a tidp 000 Location and size of areas of soils by soil types in the area of proposed disturbance and to a distance of 100 feet surrounding the area of disturbance. lyp"e f F4°pos V51 000 Cross sections of steep slope areas. 00 i Retaining walls or like constructions,with details of construction. 00 • Approximate boundaries of any areas subject to flooding or stormwater overflows, including areas of special flood hazard and coastal high-hazard areas, consistent with the definitions set forth in Chapter 130, Flood Damage Prevention, of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook Approximate Wetlands and wetland buffer boundaries shall be clearly delineated. 00 • Location of fire and other emergency zones,including the location of fire hydrants. W 00 a Studies to include,but not necessarily limited to: environmental impact analysis,wildlife,traffic,stormwater management,recreation,public service,fiscal impact,visual impact and historic significance documentation,or a written request to waive the submission requirements for these studies. 00 • Amount of any bonds required. O O A Amount of excavated material to be removed from site,if any. 1%N Me Y N NA OTHE._R(us aw eable) O O • Record of application for and approval status of all necessary permits from state and county officials and local utility companies. O O ® Identification of any federal,state or county permits required for the project's execution,including project referrals, if any,&environmental review procedures mandated by Article 8,Environmental Quality Review,of the Environmental Conservation Law(SEQRA). 00 • Any other information felt necessary by the Planning Board to allow the Board to proceed with consideration&to make an informed decision. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CHECKLIST WESMMES TER COUNTY PLANNING BOARD Notice-to Applicants/Devclopers: At some point during the development review- process your project may be referred to the Westchester County PIanning Board for review and comment in accordance with state and county laws that require local planning boards,'zoning boards of appeals and governing bodies to refer certain development applications to the County Planning Board_ Referral to the County Planning Board may not occur until your project has progressed well along through the design process_ Since the Planning Board's comments may impact project design, this checklist is provided to encourage early consideration of these areas of concern by applicants to avoid project changes later. For information on the County Planning Board review process and to access an electronic copy of this checklist, go online to www,westchestergov.com/planningreferrals or contact Lukas Herbert at lah5@westchestergov.com. L COUNTY PLANNING BOARD POLICIES: Written policies underlie all recommendations of the County Planning Board. Westckester 2025-Conhw far County and Municipal Planning and Policies to Guide County Planning,adopted by the County Planning Board on 5/6/08,amended I/5/10,can be found at ww.westchestergov.com/2025. ❑ Westchester 2025: Policies should be reviewed to determine how they relate to the development proposal. H. IMPACTS TO COUNTY FACILITIES AND SERVICES: The County Planning Board coordinates the review of development projects with Westchester County departments to identify and address potential impacts on County services and infrastructure.in some situations,permits and approvals may be required that could change project design. Site Plan Checklist Page 4 of 7 Project Address 52S EL DIV "'LC Ayc"99 ❑ Map of County Facilities: Review the State & County Roads and Parks map(which also includes county channel lines) to identify proximity to County facilities at: %ww.westchestergov.com/planningdocs/pdfrnapsteoungstateroadsparks.pdf. Other useful map links for information about environmental features, septic/sewer map, county sewer districts map, etc can be found at: W%W.westchestergov.com/maps ❑ COUNTY ROAD: Applications for development on sites that abut a County road must be submitted for review by the County Department of Public Works. Information and forms can be found at: www.westchestergov.com/dpw/bidgperm.htm. Former County Roads do not need review by the Department of Public Works,but will still likely trigger a review by the County Planning Board_ ❑ COUNTY CHANNEL LINES: Applications for development on sites within 100 feet of a designated County Channel Line require a stream control permit from the County Department of Public Works. Information and forms can be found at: www.weqtchestergov.ctmn/dpw/bidgperm.htm ❑ COUNTY PARK: New construction & land alteration projects adjacent to County parks are expected to address screening& buffer of new uses from the park, as appropriate. Stormwater should not drain from a developed site onto a County park without acceptable quantity and quality controls. County parks are designated as Critical Environmental Areas. ❑ SEWAGE TREATMENT AT COUNTY TREATMENT PLANT: Local municipalities are required to reduce and eliminate inflow and infiltration(I&I)into the sanitary sewage systems tributary to County treatment plants.New development will be expected to reduce 1&1 in relation to generation of new flow at a ratio of three to one. This requirement must be discussed with local officials. ❑BEE-LINE BUS SERVICE: Bee-Line bus stops serving a development site should be identified on plans or noted if located off-site. If a bus stop is located along the site's frontage, the applicant should contact the County Department of Transportation to discuss impacts and the need for improvements. Safe and separate pedestrian access should be provided to link a bus stop and sidewalk with building entrances. Information on County bus service and design guidelines can be found at: westchestergov.com/transpomti ontimagesBus%20Servi ce%2OGuidel ines.pdf ❑FAIR AND AFFORDABLE HOUSING: Many municipalities require inclusion of fair & affordable units in new developments. Financial assistance to achieve fair & affordable housing development is available through Westchester County & other sources. Applications tkat include aew residential units to be affirmatively marketed&sold or rented subject to fair& Affordable housing provisions should be tied to Westchester County guidelines on affordability including income guidelines of eligible households that can be found at: http:/ihomes.westchestergov.com/. If County funding is sought to develop fair & affordable housing,the County Board of Legislators must be included as an involved agency under SEQR_ ❑RECYCLING: New buildings must contain a designated area of sufficient size for separation and storage of recyclables and trash. Building expansions should also include sufficient space for separation and storage of recyclables. For more information about County recycling requirements go to: www.,.wstchestergov.com/environment_jecycling.htm ❑STORM SEWER SYSTEM. Any connections to a County storm sewer line will require a permit from the Department of Public Works in accordance with the County Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination (IDDE) law. Information & forms can be found at: www.westchestergov.com/dpw/bidgperm.htm Non-stormwater discharges to the County storm sewer system are prohibited. III.DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS The County Planning Board's land use policies focus attention on several aspects of development that may have intermunicipal and quality of life impacts. The list below includes areas most frequently commented on by the County Planning Board. ❑WATER: All development plans should include sufficient provisions for stormwater management, water quality measures and mitigation of flooding. ❑Mans should identify the major drainage basin or watershed the site is located in (Croton River, Upper Hudson Rimer, Lower Hudson,Upper Long Island Sound, Bronx River and Lower Long Island Sound). An interactive map with watershed boundaries can be found at www.wcstchestergov.com/planning/maps&lists/drainbasinsI lxI7.htmi ❑Watershed plans have been developed for several of the County's watersheds - the Croton, Indian Brook-Croton Gorge, Bronx River & Long Island Sound watersheds - that include specific recommendations that apply to development projects. See recommendations in watershed plans at: planning.westchestergov.com/index.php?option=eorn_content&task--view&id= 1231& ltemid=2204 Site Plan Checklist Page 5 of 7 Project Address STS FL.L*dVht-9 AwGrou 6 El Development that involves filling, creation of impervious surfaces or buildings and substantive loss of natural vegetation in a floodplain or flood prone area should be avoided. ❑Above ground,vegetated retention/detention basins or devices are preferred because they perform better,are easier to inspect and maintain and provide additional environmental benefits over subsurface structural devices. Any such treatments should not he constructed within wetlands or buffer areas around wetlands. ❑The development should treat and retain as much stormwater on-site as possible,particularly when the site is located in a drainage basin with known flooding problems. A Construction Stormwater Toolbox with tools and sources of technical information related to the construction activities and stormwater management best practices is available from the New York State Department of Environmental.Conservation at; www.dec,ny.gov/chemical/8694.html ❑New development should include protection of aquatic resources_ For more information about protection of aquatic resourc-es& buffer areas,go to: planning.westchestergov.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1491&Itemid=2458 [Impervious cover should be minimized. Permeable paving surfaces should be used where feasible. Vegetative rain gardens should be used,particularly in areas of overland or channelized stormwater flow, to improve stormwater quality and reduce runoff volume. For more information,go to: wwwwestchestergov.com/stonnwater ❑Buildings along coastlines and low lying area should consider the impacts of sea level rise. Specific consideration is required of potential impacts to surface and subsurface drinking water supplies. ❑ SITE LAYOUT. Aesthetic design,building orientation and community character should be considered in the site layout and building appearance. El In most locations,buildings should face the street and have pedestrian access from the street. ❑Commercial buildings should be located near the front street line with the majority of parking located in the rear of the building. Even gas stations and convenience stores should be upfront in a landscaped setting with parking, pumps and canopy toward the rear. ❑Buildings should be of pedestrian-scale when seen from the sidewalk. El Building facades should contribute to and enhance the character of the community. ❑Driveway and pathway connections should be provided to adjacent sites when possible and crosseasements provided. ❑ STREETS. Street design should reduce unwarranted paving and promote connectivity. ❑New streets should connect with adjacent streets wherever feasible to prevent the proliferation of dead-end streets and promote neighborhood integration. ❑Connections could be vehicular or pedestrian/bicycle only, where appropriate. ❑Street widths should be minimized for streets with low traffic volume to reduce speeds and impervious surfaces. Lane widths of 12 feet are only appropriate for major roadways. C1 Driveway widths should he no more than 9 feet to reduce impervious surfaces. ❑Permeable paving surfaces should be used where feasible. ❑ GREEN TECHNOLOGY. New development should include as many green building elements as possible,such as: renewable building materials,energy efficient heating/cooling systems and fixtures,water saving devices,green roofs and permeable paving surfaces. Information can be obtained from the U.S. Green Building Council at: www.usgbc.org. ❑ LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING. The site improvements should enhance community character. Site Plan Checklist Page 6 of 7 Project Address 52S Mtn v apl,Z Avit4wIF ❑ Landscaping should consist of native plant species appropriate for the location. Invasive plant species should be prohibited. Invasive plant information available at:ww-w.westchestergov.com/planning/environmenLtbReporWinvasivePlantsBrochO8.pdf ❑ Pollutant tolerant plantings should effectively shield parking,loading areas and refuse collection sites. ❑ Site lighting should be provided at the lowest safe levels and lowest heights,avoiding all spillage off site. ❑ PEDESTRIANS.Safe,convenient and ADA accessible pedestrian access is provided. ❑ A sidewalk should be provided along the site frontage along each street. ❑ Direct pedestrian connections should he made from the front of the building to the sidewalk. Pedestrian crossings of drive-ways& parking lots should be minimized or avoided. If they must be provided,painted crosswalks should be provided through parking lots. ❑ ADA accessibility trust be provided. ❑ BICYCLISTS. Provisions for bicyclists should be incorporated into project design. ❑ Bicycle parking should be provided in commercial and residential developments. Guidelines can be found at: www,apbp,org/resource/resmgr/publ ications/bicycle__park ing_guidel ines.pdf ❑ If near a trailway or bicycle route,extra consideration should be given to bicycle accessibility such as bike lanes on internal roadways,bicycle parking and other amenities. ❑ Drive-thru lanes at uses such as banks and fast-food restaurants should also be accessible for bicycles. Waiver: Upon finding by the Building Inspector, Village Engineer, Planning Board or Board of Trustees that, due to the particular character or limited nature of development or change in use or to special conditions peculiar to a site,the submission of a final site plan,or certain portions of information normally required as part of the site development plan, is inappropriate or unnecessary or that strict compliance with said submission requirements will cause extraordinary and unnecessary hardship,such official or Board may waive such submission requirements afierever, in the opinion of such official or Board, such waiver will be consistent with the goal of promoting the public Health, safety and general welfare of the community The findings for granting such waiver shall become a part of the public record. Any waiver request must be made in writing, and include sufficieat detailed information fpr the appropriate authority to make an informed decision. Desitin Professional's Certification of Completion of Checklist I have fully reviewed the Village of Rye Brook's requirements and certify this application to be a complete submission_ I understand that an incomplete plat or incomplete checklist shall be deemed an incomplete submission and shall be returned to the applicant upon determination of such by the appropriate authority. Name{Print} o ¢u'!110 evT i.. w r: gaA .] F K 16ILCM1'l6t-1 Signature , i J � 1 Date Professional Seal Check List 7 12.13 Site Plan Checklist Page 7 of 7 617.20 Appendix C State Environmental Quality Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART 1-PROJECT INFORMATION fe o 6e cam ted7r:7ntsor Project ect S sor 1. APPLICANT/SPONSOR OJECT NAME FI AN►3uLt ANE ZS EL-k.tNpAI.0 AV6NVC Two-UA�� 1 17wrti-41+v1r 3, PROJECT LOCATION: Municipality \11L LA(.e 0f r Dov County kepi uA fS-(Fp- 4. PRECISE LOCATION(Street address and road intersections,prominent landmarks,etc.,or protide map) S25 r,%-Lrt•117ALe AvtNue {ArPI6vc. 184 F'*; T.A%-t or So0111A Pow. 161"Al) 5. PROPOSED ACTION IS: ❑ New ❑ Exaruion O Modification/afteration LtE.LA L%-LE W%tST, Ttwo-FAM i bul+E"I 6. DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY: Tor, Ewts�l sA&t rwow 1F0 -Ly b�,,,F,LLIrJt!j A Two-FA"'+'11 F'v e G u&-,s ILA j,*o5 A 6d. IT AM A l-t v n je-- iffier a u 11 t t'Lt:vs AS A '[wo C-A.".% w%4A- 1,4. `Mle %>WL tJWANj'rP WISH To U&AWLIE IT At TWs- FAM �. 7. AMOUNT OF LAND AFFECTED: Initially '-t~" acres Ultimately _Z.Gy!q acres & WILL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER EXISTING LAND USE RESTRICTIONS? Yes No If No,describe briefly t-th"*j I-rTrK.4 le41C DI MEr+kL6"4P 14g rj [ao<,►Fop n IPA W ttR &Ala IrtoPt fGL471oN{ . 9. WHAT IS PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT? 10 Residential Industrial Commercial Agriculture [:] Park/ForesVOpen Space ❑ Other Describe: -Vw 0- FA 10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL,OR FUNDING,NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY (FEDERAL,STA'L'E OR LOCAL)? 64 Yes [:]No If Yes,Iisl agency(s)name and permiVapprovals: \�tL,LA►6e of "E PALM"- Put%-Viw4 PC fA1-1KLyWT- 11. DOES ANY ASPECT OF THE ACTION HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL? Yes 0 No If Yes,list agency(s)name and permil/approvals: 12. AS A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMIT/APPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION? Yes No CERTIFY T,THE INF MATiON PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Appficantfsponsor name: ! rt C/1 Date: 3 -c�& Yv v S Signature. If the action Is In the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment OVER 1 it �iil PART II- IMPACT ASSESSMENT To be compkilbed by Lead Agency) A DOES ACTION EXCEED ANY TYPE I THRESHOLD IN 6 NYCRR,PART 617.4? If yes,coordinate the review process and use the FULL EAF. Yes ❑ No B. WILL ACTION RECEIVE COORDINATED REVIEW AS PROVIDED FOR UNLISTED ACTIONS IN S NYCRR,PART 617.6? if No,a negative declaration may be superseded by another involved agency. ❑Yes ❑ No C. COULD ACTION RESULT IN ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED 1MTH THE FOLLOWING:(Answers may be handwritten,if legible) C1_ Existing air quality,surface or groundwater quality or quantity,noise levels,existing traffic pattern,solid waste production or disposal, potential for erosion,drainage or footling problems? Explain briefly: C2 Aesthetic,agricultural,archaeological,historic,or other natural or cultural resources;or community or neighborhood character?Explain briefly: C3_ Vegetation or fauna,fish,shellfish or wildlife species,significant habitats,or threatened or endangered species?Explain briefly_ C4. A community's existing plans or goals as officially adopted,or a change in use or intensity of use of land or other natural resources?F_xptain briefly: CS. Growth,subsequent development,or related activities likely to be induced by the proposed action?Explain briefly: C6. Long term,short term,cumulative,or other effects not identified in C I-CS? Explain briefly: C7. Other impacts(including changes in use of either quantity or type of energy)? Explain briefly: D. WILL THE PROJECT HAVE AN IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENTAL CHARACTERISTICS THAT CAUSED THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL AREA(CEA)? Yes []No If Yes,explain briefly- I- IS THERE,OR IS THERE UKELY TO BE,CONTROVERSY RELATED TO POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? Yes ❑No If Yes,explain briefly: PART III-DEIERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE(To be completed by Agency) INSTRUCTIONS: For each adverse effect identified above,determine whether it is substantial,large,important or otherwise significant. Each effect should be assessed in connection with its(a)setting(i.e.urban or rural);(b)probability of occurring; (c)duration;(d)irreversibility;(e) geographic scope; and (f) magnitude. If necessary,add attachments or reference supporting materials. Ensure that explanations contain sufficient detail to show that all relevant adverse impacts have been identified and adequately addressed. If question D of Part tI was checked yes,the determination of significance must evaluate the potential impact of the proposed action on the environmental characteristics of the CEA. Check this box if you have identified one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts which MAY occur. Then proceed directly to the FUL EAF and/or prepare a positive cfedaration. Check this box ifyou have determined,based on the information and analysis above and any supporting documentation,thatthe proposed action VA NOT result in any significant adverse environmental impacts AMD provide,on attachments as necessary,the reasons supporting this determination Name of Lead Agency Date Print or Type Narne of Responw—Wr m Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Prepaner of different from responsible officer) 32.5rrLo15 VVeskc mhw Cou*G]S::Tivftoet Maps Tax Parcel Maps Ye:Brook RYES � � 4 z , -- Rye Brook .Rye �raa Disclaimer. This tax parcel map is proNded as a public seNce to Westchester County residents for general information and planning purposes only, and should not be relied upon as a sole informational source. The County of Westchester hereby disclaims any liability from the use of this GIS mapping system by hltpJtgisvAkw.westchestergovcon tamiapsAayxi.asp e?r=RYK?29152 1/2 MaUng Labels for Praobty Adder.Cheated from Mw+icpal Tax Panel Viewer. hdo-lAvswww.mystcdestercoy.com Vilato,Michael S Ricci,Michael Twin Enterprises of NY,LLC, Kimberly 500 Ellendale Ave 496 Ellendale Ave 505 Franklin St PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 0yola,Ricardo Kolok,Geraldine Buditm,John Jr 497 Ellendale Ave 493 Franklin St 492 Franklin St PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER,NY 10573 Manton,Lucia Valenti Communications Corp, Borchatta,Michael R- 490 Ellendale Ave 109-111 S Ridge St 501 Franklin St PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER,NY 10573 Calderon,Victor Osendonski,Angela Ferraro,Luigi 523 Ellendale Ave 519 Ellendale Ave 495 Franklin St PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER,NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 Sudol,Antoinette M. 211 South Ridge Street Corp, Alonzl,Daniel 494 Franklin St 211 S Ridge St 497 W William St PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER,NY 10573 Sono,AmNi car H. Village of Rye Brook, Town of Rye, 523 112 Ellendale Ave 502 Ellendale Ave W Wiliam St PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 491 Franklin St.LLC, 215-217 S Ridge St LLC, Win Ridge Shopping Ctr De-LLC, 491 Franklin St 215-217 S Ridge St S Ridge St PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER,NY 10573 Graceland Terrace Housing, Devasia,Cynthia Johnson,Derrick & 525 Ellendale Ave 517 Ellendale Ave Tinacs PORT CHESTER,NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 496 Franklin St PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 Win Ridge Shopping Canter, Sound Federal Savings S H>01 lia 200 S Ridge St Loan, 5ale AvePORT CHESTER,NY 10573 121-125 S Ridge PH TER,NY 10573 PORT CHESTER,NY 10573 Vinci,Domenick Soriano,Eloy Spencer,Marie 499 Franklin St 4$9 Franklin St 4990 Franklin St PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER,NY 10573 Created on: 3!25!2015 Page 1 of 2 A4&kv Labels for .Cmabd from Mwucipa!Tar Parm/Vw wer bA2J4*a~Iv taftiMr oov.cam Clechl Wo,Eleanor Akmzi,Daniel Ramirez,Max 486 Franklin St 499 W William St 528 Ellendale Ave PORT CHESTER,NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER,NY 10573 Capoccl,Rose+norie Vinci,Jennie V. Charleswell,Max 499 Ellendale Ave 497 Franklin St 495 Ellendale Ave PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER, NY 10573 PORT CHESTER,NY 10573 Created ow 312MO15 Page 2 of 2 Building Permit Check List & Zoning Analysis Address: SZ5 ATFL- jS_ SBL: t ( •Z� - I - S� Zone:2--Z F Use: ZZ--> Const.Type:--7=-e,, Other: Submittal Date: 7- zZ Revisions Submittal Dates: Applicant:,_ A���( -c,.�?w_ — Nature of Work: 1-n4AL,j7_a- -tw_r� -CaL--A1 L- ;z CO.-jyr-�t�► Reviews: ZBA: MAR - 9 2015 PB: BP: Other: NUD OK (Y) ( ) FEES: Filing: ZS- BP: C/O: Legalization: ( ) ( APP.: Date Stamped: ✓ Properly Signed: Z SBL Verified: Other: ( ( ) Scenic Roads: Steep Slopes: Wetlands: Stone Water Review: Street Opening: ( ( ) ENVIlZO.: Long: Short: Fees: N/A: (. ( ) SITE PLAN: Topo: Site Protection: S/W Mgmt.: Tree Plan: Other: ( ) (Jf SURVEY: Dated: r.sC— Current: ✓ Archival: Sealed: ---- Unacceptable: PLANS: Date Stamped: Sealed: /' Copies: 3 Incomplete: N/A: Other: ( ) ( ) License: Workers Comp: Liability: Comp. Waiver: Other: Code 753#: Dated: N/A: ( f ( ) HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRICAL: Plans: Permit: N/A: Other: O O LOW-VOLTAGE ELECTRICAL: Plans: Permit: N/A: Other: (�j O FIRE ALARM/SMOKE DETECTORS: Plans: Permit: N/A: Other: PLUMBING: Plans: Permit: Nat. Gas: LP Gas: N/A/: Other: ( ) ( ) FIRE SUPPRESSION: Plans: Permit: N/A: Other: O O 2010 NY State ECCC: N/A: Other: ( ) ( ) Final Survey: Final Topo: RAPE Sign-off Letter: As-Built Plans: Other: ( ) ( ) BP DENIAL LETTER: C/O DENIAL LETTER: Other: ( ) ( ) Other: ( )ARB mtg.date: approval: notes: ( )ZBA mtg. date: approval: notes: PB mtg. date: approval: notes: REQUIRED EXISTING PROPOSED NOTES Area: $• h- `1 O(,,_ - _ Lam- - -- Circle: <22 _ - L Frontase:�- Front: Front: 2 Sides:_ & 71 (d Rear: 70 Main Cov: D°0 `7 Ok Accs.Cov: RAI s w oN - L r Ft.H/Sb: If 'L 1.077 - Sd.H/Sb: 11 .0 — toaF GFA: Z 3 . 1 04- Tot.Ini S73 D 6 3 W`l-S rCk Ft.Imp' o _5q . 5 ' dL- _.9.xt S�• ,u ou-c S7�+F . P kind: +'L Height/Storiu. 3a -2- noteI] tr t A,-j c r,- ►M BUILD MENT VIL -E OF 1YE OK FEB 2 7 2015 938 KING`' ET RYE BR ,NY 10573 (914)91 Q 39-5801 VILLAGE OF R`(E PROOK BUILDING DEPAP -t,4ENI E ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD CHECK LIST FOR APPLICANTS This form must be completed and signed by the applicant of record and a copy shall be submitted to the Building Department prior to attending the ARB meeting. Applicants failing to submit a copy of this check list will be removed from the ARB agenda. Job Address:__'�a 6- F- (,n1 o L ¢U,c,— Date of Submission: Parcel ID#:114 1 , Z7- I-SO Zone-T,.-),- r= Proposed Improvement(Describe in detail): APPLICANT CHECK LIST: (The following items must be submitted to the Building Department with the application,no exceptions). 1. ( )COMPLETED APPLICATION Prop Owner: I{ Nuc, c N le5 2. ( )EIGHT(8)SETS OF PLANS Address: )q L I4i2 sow ( a y 6-z4ve-' 3. ( )EIGHT(8)COPIES OF SURVEY los LO/ b5 V4 IG 1,9 18'/�LS( Phone A.)- _ 5 0-,2-1,0700A 4. ( )EIGHT(8)COPIES OF SITE PLAN Applicant appearing before the Board: 5. ( )FILING FEE 6. ( )SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION Address: )l L i 7. ( ) HOA APPROVAL LETTER(if applicable) Phone# �, D s{1y tI '� 8. ( )PHOTOGRAPHS Architect/Engineer: Q-, F, (r)ftV3 T- 1,e,I 9. ( )SAMPLES OF FINISHES(a sample board or Phone# E(`/S- A 5-9 model may be presented the night of the meeting) By signature below, the owner/applicant acknowledges that he/she has read the complete Building Permit Instructions&Procedures,and that their application is complete in all respects.The Board of Review reserves the right to refuse to hear any application not meeting the requirements contained herein. Sworn to before me this Sworn to before me this day of 120 day of ) 20 Signature of Property Owner Signature of Applicant Print Name of Property Owner Print Name ofApplicant Notary Public Notary Public 6.1.12 w mG, - - O o , � o sN � •� �O Ib►7cl O 0 0 `- 4 Qj w ,t FHM m C Atm4 lZp -1141 .� oU w� V�o 0 , i BUILD MENT VIL OF Ry OOK —7n V E- 938 KING ET RYE BR NY 10573 f (914)9 - 9 39-5801 FEB 2 7 2015 VILLAGE OF R`"- '-?OOK ***ss*sssssssss*sssss******sssssss*****sssssss*s*ss*s*sss*******ssssssssss**** I aT��:�is=r*.�ass�,�Ewl'1ItT� FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: Approval Date: Permit# : Application # Approval Signature: :ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD: Disapproved: Date: BOT Approval Date: Case # : Chairman: PB Approval Date: Case # = Secretary: ZBA Approval Date: Case # Other: F— Application Fee: _ fl�permit Fees: sssssss******s******sssssssss******sssssss*ss****s***:ssssssssss's*****sssssssssssss*s*s*s********sssssss*s** Exterior Building Permit Application Application dated: is hereby made to the Building Inspector of the Village of Rye Brook,NY,for the issuance of a Permit for the construction of buildings,structures,additions,alterations or for a change in use,as per detailed statement described below. 1. JobAddress: 5 2 5 E LLEJ41);\Le Ay Ery u E 2. ParcelIDN:. 141A-1 - 1-5o 1 Zone: K2'F (7, M FA1l.4 ) 3. Proposed Improvement(Describe in detail): I.E GA LIZE &V%s+7irJra Twb -Fqa. lry 'd1,,t/6LL4N/(t /Ro f!1L reSeb CAA-46S EJc(S1wG% Two- Fn�tt,, pVVf-L t;qa) k-o v tPr 4. Property Owner:Qc i 14.#rl/c M 2{ NN Mali lt5 Address: L40 e �e l EL � 106-1 a- �o bs D /1G 1 8�� s:, Phone# Cell tSy�-�o Yo f y Fax# ml-, -.i s-?-oo3.3. ink- 9 fy-gfr3 --l°1 F V List All Other Properties Owned in Rye Brook: Applicant:w z v �~ Address: �OG-/J.-- Phone#_ Cell# FqS-1?03-<,I 0141y' Fax#y Architect: MaK��1Etre D.B.A• JFh1 AR�A/'IrC-T Address: I.O• 607. ?Pj) 6r.EwSTe1, N.H. t0509 Phone# ('845) 259-S901 —Cell# (-L 16) S z2.3935 Fag# 1`40A•6 Engineer: Address: Phone# Cell# Fax# General Contractor: 'Al/A Address: Phone# Cell# Fax# 6.1.12 L` , 5. Occupancy;(1-Fam.,2-Fam.,Comm.,etc...)Prior to construction: After construction: 6. Will the proposed project require the installation of a new,or an extension/modification to an existing automatic fire suppression system?(Fire Sprinkler,ANSL System,FM-200 System,Type I Hood,etc...)Yes:_No:X(if yes,you must submit a separate Automatic Fire Suppression System Permit application&2 sets of detailed engineered plans) 7. Will the proposed project disturb 400 sq.ft.or more of land,or create 400 sq.ft.or more of impervious coverage requiring a Stormwater Management Control Permit as per§217 of Village Code? Yes:_No:-X_Area: 8. Will the proposed project require a Site Plan Review by the Village Planning Board as per§209 of Village Code? Yes: No: )< (if yes,you must submit a Site Plan Application,&provide detailed drawings) 9. Will the proposed project require a Steep Slopes Permit as per§213 of Village Code Yes: No: X (if yes,you must submit a Site Plan Application,&provide a detailed topographical survey) 10. Is the lot located within 100 ft of a Wetland as per§245 of Village Code? Yes: No: 'A (if yes,the area of wetland and the wetland buffer zone must be properly depicted on the survey&site plan) 11. Is the lot or any portion thereof located in a Flood Plane as per the FIRM Map dated 9/28/07? Yes: No: X (if yes,the area and elevations of the flood plane must be properly depicted on the survey&site plan) 12. Will the proposed project require a Tree Removal Permit as per§235 of Village Code?Yes: No:_)� (if yes,you must submit a Tree Removal Permit Application) 13. Does the proposed project involve a Home-Occupation as per§250-38 of Village Code? Yes: No: X If yes,indicate: TIER I: TIER II: TIER III: (if yes,a Home Occupation Permit Application is required) Gl W L —P0_ft: 14. Area of proposed building in square feet: SF 1"fi.: S F 2°"fl.: fs f3�fL: �+ $ 4C.C. 15. What is the total Gross Floor Area of the proposed new construction: 7.6y=' S& f T. 16. What is the total Square Footage of the proposed renovation to the existing structure: Z.EFO (0) -5-d4• fT 17. What is the total estimated cost of construction: $ / v DO .ac'-'>dG (The estimated cost shall include all site improvements,labor,material,scaffolding,fix equi ent,professional fees,includin any material and labor which may be donated gratis.) 1«Q AO. Qo�,r�/Zm. G�r'� 18. Area of lot: Square feet: 1115 C( S.IF Acres: O. L-4 Z A C-F-t S 19. Dimensions from proposed building or structure to lot lines: front yard: J 4.541 Eft, rear yard: S�vilS liXl sTt 6 right side yard: S,(v E16, left side yard: 5.S tyc. other: 20. If building is located on a corner lot,which street does it front on: JA o'( Nf f Li CA bLV 21. N.Y. State Construction Classification: lk V N.Y.State Use Classification: -CW 0- f*tA-1!±i %7WO.Wri6 22. Number of stories: TAW o Overall Height: 30'3 Z" Median Height: 23. Will the basement be full,or partial: f-1(• C41 W L. %fa s , finished or unfmished: VN Fi n l S M E D 24. What material is the exterior finish: u)/U S► b 25. Will roof be peaked,hip,mansard,flat,etc. F)(11roT. iS ?C-:AV en Roofmg material: EV.. AS FU 40 541rn4LO 26. What system of heating: 6 rF-A-n Re'l W41612- 7-Al2)AF1R-� 4 sltkm. P-eftAt1, 27. If private sewage disposal is neceary,approval by the Westchester County Health Department must be submitted with this application. Al, -- 28. Estimated date of completion: E) la_ 29. The State Workman's Compensation Law provides that before a Building Permit is issued,the Contractor,Owner, Architect,etc.,shall produce the following informat ILI, IL Name of Compensation Insurance Carrier: Policy Number: Date of Expiration: Jh 4D 11,12 J�� BUH,DING DEPARTMENT VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK 93 8 KING STREET RYE BROOK,NY 10573 (914)939-0668 FAX(914)939-5801 RESIDENTIAL LOT AREA COVERAGE Address: STS a"6A1 A%l6 Av6 Section: 141.21 Block: I Lot: So PERMITTED COVERAGE RATIOS IN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS (Local Law 3-88) YOUR ZONE AREA IN MAIN ACCESS. DECK ZONE DISTRICT SQ. FEET BLDG. BLDG. MAX. (CHECK) MAX. R-25 25,000 14% 3.5% 4% R-20 20,000 14% 3.5% 4% R-15 15,000 16% 3.5% 4% R-1 5A 15,000 12% 3.5% 4% R-12 12,500 17% 4% 4% R-10 10,000 20% 4.5% 3.5% R-7 7,500 23% 4.5% 3.5% R-5 5,000 30% 5% 3.5% R-2F 5,000 30% 5% 3.5% Existing: Proposed: 1.AREA OF LOT -4,50(o Sq. Ft. `150(0 Sq. Ft. 2. AREA OF HOUSE a. Coverage of Main Building (Including Attached Garage or Accessory Building) 1,A oA Sq. Ft. 1 j A0 Or Sq. Ft. b. Area of 1t Floor Divided By Area of Lot x 100 % 19'1 % 3.AREA OF ACCESSORY BUILDING (Includes Detached Garages,Tool Shed, Playhouses) �o 11) Sq. Ft. 618 Sq. Ft. a. Coverage of Accessory Building Area of Accessory Building Divided By Area of Lot x 100 .23 % 8 ,Z % NDN M 4.AREA OF DECK _�Sq. Ft. a. Coverage of Deck - 0 Sq Ft. Area of Deck Divided By Area of Lot x 100 I attest to the best of my knowledge and belief,the above infor WdLojLis correct. EDAR�h, MAA/S,c� Arc lite A's Si afore t � o IIx: 6.1.12 9TH �-2 N�yOQ L BUILDING DEPARTMENT VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK 938 KING STREET RYE BROOK,NY 10573 (914)939-0668 Fax(914) 939-5801 IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE RATIOS RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS Address: 525 IEI-LEk1 VALE hveSection: 14t, Z-- Block: I Lot: Sn Zone: IF-2--y IMPERVIOUS SURFACES (Definition): All buildings, as defined herein, and all areas on the ground or elevated above the ground which are comprised of materials through which water cannot readily flow, including, but not limited to asphalt, concrete, masonry, wood, gravel and clay, and which consist of elements including, but not limited to, court yards,sports courts,swimming pools,patios,sidewalks,ramps,terraces and driveways. TOTAL N AN MUM PERMITTED MAX. PERMITTED COVERAGE Zoning IMPERVIOUS LOT AREA BY MPERVIOUS SURFACES District COVERAGE IN FRONT (sq.ft.) For Base Lot For Lot Area YARD(°/°) Area(sq.ft.)* Over Base R-25 20 Lot Area °I'o R-20 30 0 to 4,000 0 55 R-15 35 4,001 to 6,000 2,200 35 6,001 to 12,000 2,900 27 R-15A 35 12,001 to 16,000 4,520 26 R-12 40 16,001 to 20,000 5,560 25 R-10 45 20,001 to 30,000 6,560 24 30,001 to 40,000 8,960 23 R-7 40 40,001 & larger 11,260 22 R-5 30 R2-F 30 *"Base Lot Area"is the minimum end of the lot size range in the"Lot Area"column Area of lot: -4,90(p sq.ft Existing Allowed Proposed Total impervious coverage c) S .ft. $ 3o(a S . ft. S.44') sq.ft. Front impervious coverage % 30 % 5118 % 6T) l I attest to the best of my knowledge and belief,the above information is.correct. j , QEF.t.4AP�S�L' i�fi Arc itect's Signvliia 6.1.12 BuLDING DEPARTMENT VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK 938 KING STREET RYE BROOK,NY 10573 (914)939-0668 FAX(914)939-5801 BULK REGULATIONS IN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS Address: 525 Est F rI.AALE Ms. Section: 141.2-4 Block: I Lot: sG MAXIMUM GROSS FLOOR AREA USE FORMULA: Maximum Gross Floor Area =4,000 + [(Lot Area—21,780) x 0.11478421 ): a. Allowed = Z,36 I Sq. Feet b. Existing = 24 6-4 I Sq. Feet c. Proposed = t, D 11 Sq. Feet HEIGHTISETBACK RATIOS FOR RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS DEFINITION: A standard designed to regulate the height of a building in relation to the average grade of the corresponding portion of the lot line from which it is set back. The ratio modifies the maximum permitted Height of Building by forming an inclined plane beginning at the average grade along the portion of the lot line from which the setback is measured and rising toward the building at the specified ratio above which no part of any building, other than minor architectural features such as chimneys, skylights and dormer windows not covering more than 10°x6 of the entire roof area,shall be permitted to extend. Height and Setback shall be calculated using the formula; Height/Setback=X. where X is the required side or front yard ratio for the zoning district in which a property is located as specified in Article VIII of Chapter 250. A complete elevation view for the proposed improvement must be included on the drawings. FILL IN YOUR RATIOS: 21DAW A32ry w PAOF OdW.V I190LAU" FRONT: FRONT: FRONT: .48 AW SIDE: SIDE: SIDE: 1.30 FRONT: FRONT. FRONT: .60 Jr-210 SIDE: SIDE: SIDE: 1.60 FRONT: FRONT: FRONT: .60 AILIS SIDE: SIDE: SIDE: 1.60 FRONT: FRONT: FRONT: .80 ALIZA SIDE: SIDE: SIDE: 2.40 FRONT: FRONT: FRONT: .69 AL12 SIDE: SIDE: SIDE: 1.60 FRONT: FRONT: FRONT: .80 ALIO SIDE: SIDE: SIDE: 2.40 FRONT: FRONT. FRONT: .96 /11-7 SIDE: SIDE: SIDE: 3.00 FRONT: FRONT: FRONT: 1.20 IR3 SIDE: SIDE: SIDE: 4.00 FRONT ►,nZ� FRONT: ►.v2'+ FRONT: 1.20 /ghW SIDE: JA SIDE: 4,24 SIDE: 4.00 BRED ARC I attest to the best of my knowledge and belief,the above information is correct. G^S •Wtvq,c� Architect's Sign ture _„� CP,�� �`•�' 6.1.12 This application must be properly completed in its entirety by a N.Y. State Registered Architect or N.Y. State Licensed Professional Engineer & signed by those professionals where indicated. It must also include the notarized signature(s) of the legal owner(s) of the subject property, and the applicant of record in the spaces provided. Any application not properly completed in its entirety and/or not properly signed shall be deemed null and void, and will be returned to the applicant. Please note that application fees are non-refundable. STATE)1EW YORK,COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER ) as: k ( lit "A16S I ,being duly sworn, deposes and states that he/she is the applicant above named, (print name of individual signing as the app cant) and further states that (s)he is the legal owner of the property to which this application pertains, or that (s)he is the for the legal owner and is duly authorized to make and file this application. (indicate architect,contractor,agent,attorney,etc.) That all statements contained herein are true to the best of his/her knowledge and belief, and that any work performed, or use conducted at the above captioned property will be in conformance with the details as set forth and contained in this application and in any accompanying approved plans and specifications,as well as in accordance with the New York State Uniform Fire Prevention &Building Code, the Code of the Village of Rye Brook and all other applicable laws, ordinances and regulations. Sworn to before me this Sworn to before me this day of 20157 day of _' 20 )A I- (14L-.11 ure o rope Owner Signature of Applicant Print Name of Property er Print Name of Applicant N Pu tc Notary Public BUZANNE FREGIEN No" Stats of New YWk No, CIFRO312676 OualOW In Dukhm CouMy mor on EM*ve INW2014 6.1.12 � d li Li b E oAN lz o� A 7 T � IiIII � D I Z L1tL -1-L� x o � 1l To —— r__� 70 -0 P 0 €x D � , nuAwmeNrnFa ExISTINr,cFZAwL HANEY EX13TINS EXISTING°GONOITIONE, 5FA,E PLAN& J F A R C N T E C T EXISTING FIRST FLOOR filAlO� �MIhY �W hhIN� -23=i5 ���°FOR Pv MIT 27-15 IS UE TO VILLAGE P5 A_� PLAN 525 ELLENPALE AVENUE RYE EROOK,NEW YORKeieTEraEo—PITECT __ = NILLAGE OF RYE BROOK) PO_eox aei ergs 9n. ep eaa-2aa-3eo U) o _ - n Al il 70 E D D Z nN aUm r_____________aNAx n o C -u A ° rn D R K C) o 0 zT� za„ i D Z nxnwrnG NUNrlFR EXISTING SEGOND �. NG FLOOR PLAN ff HNYXI�fiINC� ST°tiG��No�T�otis EXISTING UNOCCUFIED TNO-FAMIL'r r�)NELLINO J F N A R C H I T E C Ta '-i' 3-2-15 IS UE TORVILLAGE PB A_2 ATTIc PLAN 525 ELLENPALE AVENUE RYE BROOK,NEW YORK eisrerzeo aRwrtecr _- = (VILLArE OF RYE BROOK) Po_eox aei ere 9 ep saa-2aa-eeo LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS R E S I D E N T I A L C O D E N O T E S z O N I NG TABULATION �� MuWAJ lit Villa of R Brack Zone. R2-F T o-Fa '1 -oz IZQ pa y: ge ye ( w mI y) AFJ_ ncENRAT IN Ng' RAZING MEA FEET NEW YORK STATE 2010 CODE COMPLIANCE NOTES FOR EXISTING TWO-FAMILY DWELLING Topic Regylred/Permitted EXlsting Proposed _ �I rc AFI L. GYP BD eoARD EFTEII D _ L° I'IaXlmum Gross Floor Area - CHIP BOIN NUEUM TAINLESS 5T E1111 GINDRAMINA F led A ETH ied A - �T(rwo FATM z nlc YoNrz crG 2i,T00)x u4/04211- - - GRrzA. LPAN z.TUE DDAMH'Two FAM LT"ALL, Tues.F_ATRUCTION PFA PTE PRESENT Tu..XlsriNO coNalTlous or THIS of a Main Building S 361 IF C1on bttl C n°AtuC 6tti p POALDD HGT_ Su CERA r o FanUrRliwETLN�6AL - HowE E1 rH HAGS of IrE az RECWN ZEs r As A ONE FA L DWELL NG. TUE _ L al�_- ALSO IISIENDIA I'linlmUm Lot Slze 6aKG o ILACK G NOLL) LIATON sr FMR RESIDENTIAL CODE OF NEW YORK STATE 2010 APPENDIX J EXISTING BUILDINGS ff STRUCTURES: FT e so FTN e ET MENTFNTT MLE`AR T 17 DB PEAp cr1oN e a F toe o ITEMT rage 50 FT _ I TV NTsPuoNE a.iloll 6uRPasN - AaaLY ro rHE RE>' LTERAr N, Min' m Front Yard °9205 FT m14 5A5 FT « X14.54 FT x - - 'EENTyJET r THRou H..S) �-,, o AND A- Minimum Side Yard 6 FT 2.6 FT * 2.6 FT t CER. VIL, LEVELTORUNI2 T' F TTYPICALIR ANN ERE RI RE ORA TO NAN cE WITH THESE PRwlsoNs sunt Min' m Bath Side Yards 16 FT e l ET t 8.1 ET r , AL, ERUN mu TO C CH, 1MINA TOPERaeINETIE"THE 11 SPIPIT IF THE Minimum Rear Yard 30 FT 4.8 FT * 4.8 FT IE WEEMEN LEAR"U 11111ITI(A"c asorvlr Uwr aJcn CLATH DLAA'�'AN'LA - - 1FTNrowr�uo s TARE FIT IT""ll IF A WITICIP PIR- w1-FAMILY Maximum Building Height 2 Stary or 30 FT. 2 Story 4 25.42' 2 Story 4 25.42' LA5ET "711 Naisos.l -'F PuEAN1I ER-IPIU s AeELT"HERE T«E ACTIVITY Is CLAIANID Al A CUANv Ma Height/Setback Ratia - _ _ EA ILS Height=Setback RFNFXSetback° _ - - CORT CENTER OT n15C. n15LELLANE0U5 F - StdeYO400 X e 24'k Sldet He�9htkat 5?de54 Sider Het9 of kat OF, U PET DETRITAnol - - 5etbxk cord Setback 5. Yard Setback 5. uTRACT wscT wclNSCm _ _ AEl _ c1(TAWNWIUs1EL Minlmum Usable Open Space _IF X AAA3,64T E ,64T E LLQ RIIN " ,NNSMwL5AP 'YFFMTH TITHALLEACTIONAVAALI nandatPry orf-sheet LAading red 11�ded 1�ided IF N'��ALRLL saes Nv - -FAMILY WHATHINvs CONVEITEI FOR USE AS A PEI ANI EREAK.AST DNILLINO SHALL MIT I Area/Dtueltln Unit. -red - D41 IF - -941 SF AUTiR F. 9 _ mil Aho s - Nane Requl e ABO a 'A EAFTG 'FF 'FF Anaz.z _ __ _ 11 NI Min. Off Street Parking 111"CRem2ySp evOC tt Te SpacessF tt7 Spaces F = r I"Ialn Building Constructzd ELEVTAI CN AL) PIT, 17FAS Circa 1900 - Propose to U crIN WIDTH of THE TREAp SHALL BE NOT LEss Legalize Existing Two-family: _ EXISTING FOR FACAe1PNA1 us.TO EAIAYANTI A.PUT, Floor Area per so IF ve Fo Iv r Fa'n11v 941 sf 1st Floor Fcmlly � o E exT�T exTeRla1HIT IRs SHALL Nm ExcEEa Ora INCH Family(exd. base ent) 966 si zodFF1°°r Fcmu AA se znd Fm°r Famu IN A �iN AKE Ta mq H.�HTe aI�TIN��ILIN�H��HT..H e.F nI T�Ta R AIN I.TH .aU aR .�TH. B.Na change.to EX Briar G g Pe ltt Ch g s Pmp°ems Ch—A—Pmp°�� Q _ N16H HSL �1MG REX ept Fire cap a3 FIT q00 pIA REQUIRED ITR RAFTERS FEET e INC EASUREE FRIM C.service Access At Rear Service Access GROd Service Access Provided Service Access P_il 3 Yard for Two Apartments T R. ASHEYLijRATIN A D.Mln.Off Street Park'n Two-fnrnily:s T.(')Fm INC r,w 9 F RTPR�FEET u..OPEN c AN FN�. �TINNE�L ANT AP TION PAILARIF FFFT t<u for Tenants Cott. S es 7 Spaces 7 Spaces _ E,H. EFUIREFULLO1(1NT) AnaLs RMI?T1 FnsF TNF E.Min. Usable Open Space s 3,647 IF ,647 IF FPsc. FLAIR GRAIN 11 cFOR AD GAUIIHO LF CLOSINGIPE IDvI.I IFIRRI N-VER It UA PTAELI L111L IF PFRFIIIANCF ANE sFIsn1C AA Is TAXimum Main Building Lot 30% 73 OOASFF= 4 s( Including 04 sf Including 1A- SATIAMIRCEEGECARLCovera e 2251X SFE MaXIII orches Each Puchas A.fic3.1 Al RF1uIRFD FOR NFw DNFLLNOs,SHAH,eF PRAIDFD,THF snOKF.tIaRns sHAL Mazlmum cceesory BU1ldMA I _ 61g SF+ III SF n a 1�-1 V D,T Covera e um SY 1 1 B O L K E IF nNE HARE wIRFn wuFRF INTERIOR WALL OR cFILINa FINIsut_s AR.NOT RRITIVER Ta FIRFE,THF Maximum Deck Lot Coverage SF= N°Cecks o Cecks EXISTING WALL TO REMAIN BEERTotal Maximum Impervlays 54065E IEE%I SF= E INITATTAR IN I AT EX15T1NG DOOR 6 FRAME TO REMAIN RSI3I.IINN TA2ITCEAN21=1'ItIPPINI 1111 IN orK1FArH1 DwEw NO,BNcw DIr1O BASE eNTs lEuUHMINVTI V IT At o NOT cRA"L 1sPAcls.wD Surfaces Coverage A031 SRI`FSE m00°F EO E,141 sF* 3,64q AF Tot°I MFNmvm mpervi°vs �� Coverage n Front Yard I FT X 20 FT x 598 IF* 59A SF+ 5ATT"t APARATAI"LAW"A"" EXISTING NINACN TO REMAIN euILDENOSAwn - THI R Iry BUILDINGS"HERE.1 IT r THE FRONT YARD SETBACK,BOTH SIDE YARD SETBACKS,REAR YARD SETBACK,MAXIMUM (D>EHEREOSHASLHB G D O 11fD 1 1 1111AUDINII THEIGHTISEMEACD RATIO AT NEST SIDE IARD-TITIMPERVIIIIITRFAIEIAND1AVIRIGIANTYARA COVERAGE, DIRECTIONAL ARROWARE NIFPYINNFITI1N IMPIE A ARM uA w R IR T INT R NN T wu R TT Rr _ IN AN INFTLI LING DETAIL IDENTIFICATION CALLOUT Ano ES 5 o E L s s LL mPFE nN10T�a e�LPlvv IslcuaNc.o,cAReoN�noNoxio PAwRn WE IN FOR THE VI A R R 6U LD G SHALL 'HE IMA-IMER IF LIA 5URV EYSSACKNOWLEDGEMENT YG NEL THE SURVEYS IN THE PLOT PREPARED Z ELEVATION DATUM EUIIriINcs"HERE ExisrlNEA G INTERIOR wAu_OR cEILINc,FINISH.s ARE Nm"A"TO""'THE Erz EY TERRY ERG UD JANUARY 2 OWN FOR N'NANUA 131342 INC FIT I. s RENCE ONLYE" ASSUMES NO OUR A SECTION MARK CALLOUT N p/ ' HR' NE TY CNNC AC z O O __ g 9 N ROOF PITCH INDICATOR AT No ITO11N6 ARE.oN A IIIAI A NILE THAN Is FEET nwAT FRAM A ARIVA.IFFHAID, a >o w (TaNE� -F) - ^ K Q} 6100�eeP EXISTING BATTERY OPERATED SMOKE DETECTOR TO REMAIN RY of A DNELLINO UNIT THAT CONTAINS A CARSON NONaxipE AMPAP. V d �ftp'K W Us N NEN BATTERY OPERATED 5 DETECTOR .111VIN-ONE 1PARIN - y X Q ZILI EXISTING BATTERY OPERATED CARBON MONOXIDE DETECTOR TO REMAIN 0AD ALARMALLEUCH IF Q A N NEW BATTERY OPERATED CARBON MONOXIDE DETECTOR 1313.4.3 srsT.M TuaT c�aus.s AN ALARN o O W ® EXISTING BATTERY OPERATED COMBINATION CARBON MONOXIDE f SMOKE A. a JI iv EA DETECTOR TO REMAIN TWIFHURNIRIMORYVS NNINITTE PERMANENT ANE wlLHIMT A DIScoNNDRUMECTIIN'NI Q THAN THOSE RIUMIRED FOR 1111 FURRFNT PROTECTION. ^" A IN DNA I' 11 RE INOTALLEv IN A OUILOIMF Al OTRucruRE FHTYA T AN - NORTH ARROW ❑m 7 DDAAA B LD NGS THAT N� �AIpE AURnsnawa cARBary CONoo�loE oETEcroRs nnY BIE ARMANIRA, TERc no RkIS RAT A'o-TEo,A ED ITPE aR p - 5 3PP..aAD, / "IE'RIGEN FLILL MED z sv IZtmIE.R2-F) D€YL.l DF�V" 15 RSls.as 4_jIIIe. - I FZ ToN�IOE PE RFIAR s REwIR.P T AT 11 AND ALL cnReory n MI IMM RO NN""ID. onaxiDF D1T1FroRs IN sucH Dw1LLINO a LFFPINO uNIT oR sIFFPINO,RFA SHALL DI 5 19r m IXC H.. T 1PARATID,FAIR-TTP1 WE DIRECT PwO CARSON nAOXIDI :"•"^' L I S T O F D R A W I N G S ARMsMUC AMI IRI-111 DERUTTRUNTEDWIT-TIRI ATO D 1ARRON M1N1wDE DFT T ARE PFR ITTFD ..AEIIA G—I CODE NOTES, ZONING TAB. N PLOT PLAN -E 171 11 ARK NG .o PROJECT NOTES= E(EIA- "IDE x "IT'I'l A'-LN A'E'LN11iF"E'1L1CL'E11.N I'll Nl"All T'NATUD IIIITAIA1 CAMIMT1 I-ARLY 11 THA I THIP _-r A— EXISTING CRAWL SPACE d FIRST FLOOR PLAN 3 N SHALL ATAm THE ELECTRI<AL 1NDE1wRnER.111TInTATE ANI IE1IV11 A LPPT TO TH.111LAII 11 R,E ERIII AND TH, F. I,N/r P o Q A-2 EXISTING SECOND FLOOR PLAN 4 ATTIC PLAN e- IHE�NER IHALL RETAIN A LIFENEED PL°NEER TP ORIFI ALL 1.I.TINa PLUnANa TPMPPNENTE PANFPRM TO 1PI1, " 11IFEEN w z o E we SP—I ZONING TABULATION N SITE PLAN ��� 0I,I nPLOT PLAN U Z 0 N I N G T A B U L A T I O N Municipality:Village of Rya Brook Zone R2-F(Two-Family) Toplc Regylred/Permitted EIIl ting Proposed 1'laxl mum Gross Floor Area 4 000'[(Lu - e s Fxd uofi/ z, s Fx<I unfin. If a Main Building 2i 7a05 x II47a421T_ occupied ON f Hnoccupled A 2361 F O Gl un Ht 7 6tls CI Ht.<7i_6i tic Nr imum Lot 51ze. _ Lot Areo: -- 0 FT Horizontal C 60 FT Horizontal C O FT - FT. 5 Minimum Front Yard 09 5 m 20FT 1464 FT Minimum Side Yard 6 FT 2.6 FT* 2b FT Minimum Bath side Yards 16 FT 8.1 FT t 8.1 FT Minimum Rear Yard 30 FT 4.8 FT * 4.8 FT Maximum Building Height 2 Stary or 30 FT. 2 Story 4 25.42 2 Story 4 25.42' Max. Height/Setback Ratia Fran 20 =2 Front eight Fro Front eight Fron Height=Setback RatiaXSetback°�Fr N F BOR\E77A _ sae.na oo x sew;4i-.k cope N, 'N' slae54 sPae seiea�k�-sIQe54 U /// COLVII 11 F) Ea - NIF Mialmom usable open space _ 3.64T S 5 ,647 s 5 W _ VINCI sapdatPry orF-sweet LPnding �6od�l o„'eed2 o��eed _ - �sae�aso'E so.00' (ZONE- R2-F( sF _ T-1—Illy IF - I— IRON PIN�� 31.2" y a0 l8.oe'- _ Mln�FL Area/Dwelling unit. Two�fa Il5 adv nF�,.FI�BO a nF mllaao IF Min. Off Street Parking Ca W9-2115pa eeoc tt sSpacessF tt7 Spac = r I OIN Bull ding Constructed / Or-Ic100-Propose to U L gauze Exlsting Two-family: - L A.Fli, FI r Area per so sF ve Fa Iv 4I f ct loor FNY,ly 041 of At Floor Frmuy A o 'INS%"AFMF" Family a(exd.basement) qea 9r 12,dFFlggr Fa„u SA D 2nd Fl—Fw„u B.No Changes to EXtarl r o c e Pe.-Ft o Ch s e Proposed No o Ch q—Proposed Q E. 3 cept Fi-Escapes a N 3 el8gre-os C.Sery s e Acc at Rea Service Access R,,d Sor�ico Accocc Provided Sorvico Access Provided s e Yard for TwoApartments T voacH D_Ml,Off Street Parking Tu,o-Pornilys es 7 Spaces 7 Spaces _ for Tenants \I E.Ml, Usable OF,Space s3,647 IF 3,647 IF II\_2Maximum Mal .57' ,Building Ist 30% 73 IFF= 4 sl Including o4 sf Includ oving Cera e 22511 SF5 Maximum horches Each Porchas D. Maxlmue cceesory Building L ,-SF 6 g SF+ 61B SF ov h cave _I \ Ence.za Maximum Deck L,t Cwuage -xF 7,sa6 sF= No Ixcke o Ceske m $s C FF Xo,a xl s) \ Total Maximum Impervia.s . 6 2 ftY Surfaces Coverage 4065SF,E—SF 141 IF+ 3 64x1 IF E Tocol Moxim�m I 300 of 30 3 LOT NIF coverage.i,Fro,erparaaeS o`FT x�¢at Frrz Faa IF Sae sF, AREA = SOTO r THF FRONT YARA SETBACK,60TH SIDE YARD SETBACKS,REAR YARD SETBACK,MAXIMUM(ZONE= R2-F) 0.772 , + 7,506 S F+ oir;Essslo A��r°NON o�Foa`.s ANUE 11 IIANT Y111 SUING R AVHE Rz-F) \ A ITE RTMArw WIFA" wE IN F R THE A R R BD DNG FHA LL ,OP-- SP.�I SP. 4 -11 POLE SURVEY ACKNOWLEDGEMENT YG THE SURVEY IN PREPARED ,TIONS. THE Ex N THE PLOT PLAN WT Z LOT 5 LAE ,I-- er TERRY eERo D tANUARr p owN FOR REFERENCE ONLY THE Y SPIKE EouNO 2 5' � Y O SEA SIDE YARD I d O PARKING Q} SETBACK) _ NIF 2 STRII AFFAK SP. 3 2.7' X yry Nd V11} GRACELAND love IRON PM.7Er Q b/ TERRACE Zlu O p (ZONE: R2-F) 175 S.F. PARKING - lu N P. 2 SPACE (101-011 WIDE X Z vli Q EPIKEEooN P. 1 171-6II DEEP u � � 7 NIF CALDERON ZONE: P2 I) z D O voacx w R aRu d ="V e SPIKE FOUND \ D Q w Q Z aF Q IRON PIN SST ti ^ I'D'"I PIN SE D Z_� ZW _ UTILITY POLE WITH ucln / cnrlc cv/rze VAI ELLENDALE AVENUE waWERHva6[vVE E „SzSz - �T I T E P L A N a - SP-I SSE 1 ID April 9, 2015 RESOLUTION TO SET A PUBLIC HEARING FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO LEGALIZE AN EXISTING TWO-FAMILY CONVERSION FOR THE MAIN RESIDENCE AT 525 ELLENDALE AVENUE WHEREAS, an application has been submitted by Julia Haney (the "Applicant") for site plan approval to legalize the conversion of the main residence located at 525 Ellendale Avenue, located in the R2-F District, from a one-family to a two-family residence; said property being identified as Section 141.27, Block 1, Lot 50 on the Town of Rye Tax Assessor's Map. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Village of Rye Brook Planning Board shall hold a Public Hearing on May 14, 2015 at 7:30 p.m., at Village Hall, 938 King Street, Rye Brook, New York to consider the site plan application; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Planning Board, pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA), determines the Proposed Action to be an Type II Action, and therefore, no further environmental review is required; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Applicant is directed to comply with Section 250-40 of the Village Code regarding notification. On motion by , seconded by , Mr. Michal Nowak, Superintendent of Public Works, called the roll: Domenic Accurso, Jr. Voting Robert Goodman Voting John Grzan Voting Bill Laufer Voting Amy Schoen Voting Daniel Tartaglia Voting Gary J. Zuckerman, Chairman Voting BUILDING DEPARTMENT VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK 938 KING STREET RYE BROOK,NY 10573 (914)939-0668 Phone (914)939-5801 Fax mizzo r ebrook.or Memorandum To: Planning Board From: Michael J. Izzo, Building& Fire Inspector CC: Date: April 6, 2015 Re: 525 Ellendale Avenue, Legalization of 2 Family Dwelling ZONING ANALYSIS and CLARIFICATION of RECORD. This application appears before the Planning Board as required under §209-I.B.(3). The subject application deals with the legalization of the conversion of a single family dwelling to a two family dwelling, having taken place sometime in the past. The subject lot, while unusual is not unique insofar as there are two dwellings located on such lot, a condition which exists in a number of lots in this area of the Village. This application deals with the front house only, (house located closest to Ellendale Ave.), as the 2" dwelling is considered a legal non-conforming use. Archival records indicate that prior to the adoption of the December 1930 Town of Rye Zoning Code, the subject lot contained two independent single family dwellings. Although it is unknown when the conversion of the subject dwelling took place, information contained on the archival assessment records indicate that the front house has been occupied as a two family dwelling since at least 1966. This analysis is based on information provided by JFM Architect on behalf of the co- applicants; Julia Haney & Marianna Knowles and include; • Property Survey dated January 20, 2015 sealed by, Terry Bergendorff Collins, LLS. • Plan set, HANEY—EXISTING TWO-FAMILY DWELLING, dated December 1, 2014 revised 3-27-15 pages, G-1, A-1,A-2, and SP-1, sealed by Joseph F. Mansfield, III, RA. The plans show compliance with the current zoning code for the conversion. BUIL MENT V1 E OF Rv OK 938 KING ET Rv BR ,NY 10573 (914) 9 '639-5801 e *********************************************************************************************************** FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: BOT Approval Date: PB Approval Date: BOT Disapproval Date: PB Disapproval Date: Chairman: Attach Resolution: BOT[ ] PBA [ ] ZBA [ ] *********************************************************************************************************** SITE PLAN APPLICATION SUBMISSION OF APPLICATION DOES NOT ASSURE PLACEMENT ON ANY PLANNING BOARD AGENDA. APPLICANT WILL BE NOTIFIED OF SUCH PLACEMENT. APPENDIX: THIS SITE PLAN APPLICATION REFERENCES BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING CODE SECTIONS OF THE VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK; SECTIONS: 250 ZONING, 209 SITE PLAN REVIEW, 235 TREES, 107 DEMOLITION OF BUILDINGS,224 SWIMMING POOLS, 121 EXCAVATION&TOPSOIL REMOVAL,118 EROSION&SEDIMENT CONTROL,213 STEEP SLOPES PROTECTION, 219 SUBDIVISION OF LAND, 250-40 NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS. DESIGN PROFESSIONALS&APPLICANTS ARE STRONGLY ENCOURAGED TO REVIEW THE ABOVE MENTIONED CODE SECTIONS, AVAILABLE ONLINE AT wwwxygbrook.ar�;PRIOR TO COMPLETING THIS APPLICATION. SITE PLAN: Identification of Applicant: Douglas Trokie Owner: Douglas Trokie Address: 21 Berkley Lane Rye Brook, NY 10573 E-Mail: dtrokie@tlesq.com Tel.#: 914-589-4881 Fax: Applicant: Douglas Trokie Address: 21 Berkley Lane Rye Brook, NY 10573 E-Mail: dtrokie@tlesq.com Tel.#: 914-589-4881 Fax: Design Professional: Langan Engineering Address: 707 Westchester Ave., Suite #304 E-Mail: mfinan@langan.com Tel.#: 914-323-7400 Fax: 914-323-7401 Designate to whom correspondence is to be sent: Michael Finan Note: If applicant is a LContract VendeeFj please attach a copy of the contract summary with financial and confidential terms deleted. IDENTIFICATION OF PROPERTY: 21 Berkley Lane A. Identifying Title: B. Tax Designation: Section: 135.35 Block: 1 Lot: 62 C. Zoning District: R-15 D. Street which property abuts: Berkley Lane E. Does property connect directly into State or County highway? No LAST REVISED 7.13 F. Is site within 500 feet of Village Boundary? No If yes note all bordering municipalities: N/A G. Total area of site: 17,231 SF Area of site activity: 5,880 SF H. Site coverage: 17.3 %; Building coverage: 8.7 % I. Existing building size: 1367.65 SF New/additional building size 1496.58 SF J. Existing parking spaces 0 (on site), New parking spaces 0 (on site), 2 (off street) 2 (off street) K. Nature of proposed activity: Remove existing deck, add larger proposed deck and stormwater 1 ractice ************************************** ******************************************************************** APPLICATION FEES: Application fees are non-refundable. Environmental Fees and Site Plan Fees must be paid on separate checks. Make checks payable to the: Village of Rye Brook. Residential Dwellings $300 plus- $200 per additional unit Non-Residential $450 plus- $30 per parking space Planned Unit Development $500 per acre PUD Amendment $250 Site Plan Amendment $550 Wetlands &Watercourse $1,100 Consultant Review (Environmental) Fee: Minimum fee $250 - maximum fee $2,500 estimated. Applicant's Environmental Account must have a positive balance at all times prior to any Consultant,Attorney,Village, and Board review. SITE PLAN FEE: $300 DATE PAID: 03/09/2015 ENVIRONMENTAL FEE: $250 DATE PAID: 03/09/2015 ****************************************************************************************** Please note that this application must include the notarized signature(s) of the legal owner(s)of the above-mentioned property, in the space provided below. Any application not bearing the legal property owner's notarized signature(s)shall be deemed null and void, and will be returned to the applicant. *********************************************************************************************************** STATE OF NEW YORK,COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER ) as: 10(.,G4-&-e S l(5r ,being duly sworn,deposes and states that he/she is the applicant above named, (print name of individual signing as the applicant) and further states that (s)he is the legal owner of the property to which this application pertains, or that (s)he is the for the legal owner and is duly authorized to make and file this application. (indicate architect,contractor,agent,attorney,etc.) That all statements contained herein are true to the best of his/her knowledge and belief, and that any work performed,or use conducted at the above captioned property will be in conformance with the details as set forth and contained in this application and in any accompanying approved plans and specifications,as well as in accordance with the New York State Uniform Fire Prevention &Building Code,the Code of the Village of Rye Brook and all other applicable laws,ordinances and regulations. Sworn to before me this (,o-- Sworn to before me this day 20L y of a 20J i 1�CC f�Property Own atofficant Print Name of Property Owner Print Name of Applicant WFFORD G. KLEINBAUM PLIFFe"RD G. KLEINB.AUM Notary Public State of Notaiy Piiblic State of New York New York No. 02KL-7297775 No 0,.-KL-7297775 LAST RE ED 7.13 Oualified in wcstchesler County �/'� S'ualified in!N. Ichestei County Commission Expires October 31, 20155 �,4minission Expires Octobei 31, 2016 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK 938 King Street, Rye Brook, N.Y. 10573 (914) 939-4753 Fax (V.4) 939-5801 www.ryebroo�org SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL REVIEW CHECKLIST This form shall serve as a checklist for site plan submittal and review by the Village of Rye Brook. The use of this plan review checklist by the applicant is to ensure compliance with the technical provisions of The Village of Rye Brook Site Plan Code, Section 209, pertaining to preliminary and final plan preparation. The Village of Rye Brook Site Plan Code is available at The Village of Rye Brook Building Department or to download at: www.ryebrook.orp, SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL SHALL INCLUDE: 1. APPLICATIONS. Completed and signed including correspondences. 2. CHECKLIST. Completed and signed. 3. PLANS. Signed, Sealed & Dated. Fifteen paper (15) copies or twenty (20) copies when Board of Trustees approval is required and one (1) electronic version. One (1) record set with original signatures, dates and seals may be provided and submitted with fourteen(14) copies or nineteen(19) copies that clearly indicate the signatures, dates, and seals shown on the record set. 4. FEES: All application fees and Environmental fee. A separate check for filing fee and Environmental fee. 5. Environmental Form. Short or Long Form(contact office)completed. 6. Electronic Copy. Complete copy of all plans and shall be submitted electronically at time of submission. 7. Prior to the appearance before ANY meeting or hearing of the Planning Board, the applicant must comply with N ti tion quir eats Code Section 250-40. I I -� APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE) have read the Notific tion Requirements of Code Section 250-40 and will provide notification as required. IDENTIFICATION OF APPLICANT(S): Identification of Applicant: Douglas Trokie Applicant: Douglas Trokie Address: 21 Berkley Lane Rye Brook, NY 10573 Tel. #: 914-589-4881 Fax: E-Mail: dtrokie@tlesq.com Project Name: 21 Berkley Lane Project Address: 21 Berkley Lane Current Property Owner: Douglas Trokie Address: 21 Berkley Lane Rye Brook, NY 10573 Tel. #: 914-589-4881 Fax: E-Mail: dtrokie@tlesq.com IDENTIFICATION OF PROPERTY: Identifying Title: 21 Berkley Lane Tax Designation:Section: 135.35 Block:I Lot: 52 Zoning District: R-15 Street which property abuts: Berkley Lane Plan Submission Date: 2015-02-27 Site Plan Checklist Page 1 of 7 Project Address 21 Berkley Lane Y N NA PLANREOUIREMENTS 000 15-20 copies of plans prepared and signed by a registered Land Surveyor,Engineer or Architect. 0 O O One(1)electronic copy of all submitted plans. ¢ O O Topographic Survey stamped by New York State Land Surveyor with license number and seal. O O Topographic survey scale of one(1)inch per twenty(20) feet or larger. j� O O Section, block and lot numbers of the property taken from the latest tax records along with a copy of the most recent property card on file with the Town of Rye Tax Assessor's office. O O 0 Name of the proposed subdivision plan. Q O O Name and address of the owner of record. 0 O O Name and address of the applicant. O O 01 Deed reference(s). O O Names, addresses and signature of every Engineer, Architect, Land Surveyor or Soil Scientist whose professional seal appears on any site plan submitted to the Board. O O North arrow and scale. O O Location map at the minimum scale of 1❑equals 1,000 feet. O O Area of all lots,in square feet. O O Engineering notes on plans as stated in application packages. O O 0 Copies of all existing and proposed deed restrictions or covenants applying to the property, including, but not limited to, covenants and agreements restricting the use and establishing future ownership and maintenance responsibilities for all private roads,recreation,and open space areas. 0014 Any prior land use approvals with respect to the subject property. W O O Date the plans were first drafted. Any revision(s)made to any of the sheets first submitted are to be so noted in the revision block. The revision block is to be placed on the originals of the revised sheets. Additional paper copies are to be made& submitted for the Planning Board&Building Dept.to replace those sheets previously submitted. " O O Other existing site improvements,including,but not limited to,fences, landscape or retaining walls,landscaping & screening. 000 Location of all buildings and structures on the premises and approximate location of all neighboring buildings or structures within 100 feet of the lot line. IN O O Fees paid to The Village of Rye Brook Building Department. O O 0( Any revisions to plans shall be identified with a revision cloud and numbered revision triangle Y N NA ABUTTING PROPERTYINFORMATION 01 O O The names and addresses of all abutting property owners within 250 ft as indicated in the Municipal records. 0 O O Zoning and use of abutting properties noted on plans. 01 O O Shape,size,height and location of existing buildings and driveways within one hundred(100)feet of the site. of O O Location and description of existing easements within one hundred(100)feet of the site. O O 0 Location of existing private or public trails within one hundred(100)feet of the site. 0 O O Location of existing roads, scenic roads and/or driveways within two hundred(200)feet of the site. JR O O Location of proposed parkland. If none state nearest recreation facility O O 0 Location of existing septic system leach fields within two hundred(200)feet of the site. O O Locations,dimensions,grades and flow direction of existing sewers, culverts,waterlines as well as other underground utilities within and adjacent to the property. Site Plan Checklist Page 2 of 7 Project Address 21 Berkley Lane O O 0 The location of all existing watercourses, intermittent streams,wetland areas and springs,consistent with the definitions set forth in Chapter 245,Wetlands and Watercourses, of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook. Y N NA PROPOSED SITE PLAN INFORMATION O O Sufficient, acceptable information to readily determine the location, bearing, and length of every street line, lot line, and property boundary line. JR O O Location of all building setback lines. 000 Topographic data at a minimum contour interval of 2 A[increments,showing existing and proposed contours on the property and extending a minimum of 25 feet into all adjacent properties. 1400 The location and characteristics of the different areas of vegetation, including the identification of all individual trees 12 or more inches in diameter at breast height("DBH"), protected trees of any size, as well as stands of trees and wooded areas, within areas of proposed disturbance, consistent with the provisions of Chapter 235, Trees, of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook. N O O Location and proposed development of all buffer areas, including existing vegetative cover. 1000 Location and description of any zoning district and municipal boundaries including a zoning compliance chart for the existing and proposed lots. 000 Shape, size,height and location of all existing and proposed buildings. O O Location and description of any existing and proposed easements. O O Location and dimensions of all existing and proposed streets, driveways, sidewalks,parking spaces,bicycle parking, loading areas and other facilities associated with the proposed use. O O ¢ Identification of the location and amount of building area proposed for retail sales or similar commercial activity. O O Location of existing and proposed utilities(water,sewer,gas, electrical,telephone,oil tank etc.). O O Design and location of all existing and proposed wells, septic tanks and leach field systems, or methods of waste water disposal. 0( O O Location,type and size of all existing and proposed landscaping and screening including fences and walls. O O Location, size and proposed screening of outdoor storage areas,if any. O O Location, design and construction material of all existing or proposed site improvements, including drains, culverts, retaining walls,landscape walls and fences. O O 0 Exterior lighting plan and proposed signs to be located on site,including sign orientation, size,height,and elevation view. O O R Storm drainage plan and plans for snow removal and storage. O O R Pedestrian and automobile circulation plan. O O Construction drawings for pavements,walks, steps,curbing,drainage&other structures associated with the proposed use. O O Erosion and sedimentation control plan,including installation details of proposed control measures,directive construction notations and a schedule for the installation and maintenance of proposed control measure. 01 O O Description of measures planned to assure proper erosion and sedimentation control in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 118 entitled"Erosion and Sediment Control,"of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook. O O Drawing and computation for storm water detention design for a 25-year storm in accordance with the Westchester County Best Management Practices O O Rock outcroppings and areas of steep slope consistent with the definitions set forth in Chapter 213, Steep Slope Protection, of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook. O O Q Location of any common lands and/or public lands. 01 O O Phasing or an estimated project construction schedule. O O 0 Supporting documents,including deeds,maintenance, condominium agreements,etc. Site Plan Checklist Page 3 of 7 Project Address 21 Berkley Lane 000 Location of proposed construction or area of disturbance and its relationship to any property line, easement, building, structure, road, wall, fence, sewage disposal system, well, wetland feature or tree exceeding six inches in diameter measured at a height of four feet from the ground N O O Estimate of earthwork showing the quantity of any material to be imported to and/or removed from the site including a chart with the number/species and size of any trees to be removed. of O O Location and size of areas of soils by soil types in the area of proposed disturbance and to a distance of 100 feet surrounding the area of disturbance. M O O Cross sections of steep slope areas. 000 Retaining walls or like constructions,with details of construction. 0014 Approximate boundaries of any areas subject to flooding or stormwater overflows, including areas of special flood hazard and coastal high-hazard areas, consistent with the definitions set forth in Chapter 130, Flood Damage Prevention, of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook. Approximate Wetlands and wetland buffer boundaries shall be clearly delineated. 000 Location of fire and other emergency zones, including the location of fire hydrants. 0100 Studies to include,but not necessarily limited to: environmental impact analysis,wildlife,traffic, stormwater management,recreation,public service, fiscal impact,visual impact and historic significance documentation, or a written request to waive the submission requirements for these studies. O O N Amount of any bonds required. O O 0( Amount of excavated material to be removed from site, if any. Y N NA OTHER(as applicable) O 014 Record of application for and approval status of all necessary permits from state and county officials and local utility companies. O O §J Identification of any federal, state or county permits required for the project's execution,including project referrals, if any, &environmental review procedures mandated by Article 8,Environmental Quality Review, of the Environmental Conservation Law(SEQRA). O O 0( Any other information felt necessary by the Planning Board to allow the Board to proceed with consideration&to make an informed decision. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CHECKLIST WESTCHESTER COUNTYPLANNING BOARD Notice to Applicants/Developers: At some point during the development review process your project may be referred to the Westchester County Planning Board for review and comment in accordance with state and county laws that require local planning boards, zoning boards of appeals and governing bodies to refer certain development applications to the County Planning Board. Referral to the County Planning Board may not occur until your project has progressed well along through the design process. Since the Planning Boards comments may impact project design, this checklist is provided to encourage early consideration of these areas of concern by applicants to avoid project changes later. For information on the County Planning Board review process and to access an electronic copy of this checklist, go online to www.westchestergov.coin/planningrefeiTals or contact Lukas Herbert at lah5@westchestergov.com. I. COUNTY PLANNING BOARD POLICIES: Written policies underlie all recommendations of the County Planning Board. Westchester 2025-Context for County and Municipal Planning and Policies to Guide County Planning,adopted by the County Planning Board on 5/6/08,amended 1/5/10,can be found at ww.westchestergov.coni/2025. ❑ Westchester 2025: Policies should be reviewed to determine how they relate to the development proposal. II. IMPACTS TO COUNTY FACILITIES AND SERVICES: The County Planning Board coordinates the review of development projects with Westchester County departments to identify and address potential impacts on County services and infrastructure.In some situations,permits and approvals may be required that could change project design. Site Plan Checklist Page 4 of 7 Project Address. 21 Berkley Lane ❑ Map of County Facilities: Review the State & County Roads and Parks map (which also includes county channel lines) to identify proximity to County facilities at: wr,,vw.westchestergov.com/planningdocs/pdfmaps/countystateroadsparks.pdf. Other useful map links for information about environmental features, septic/sewer map, county sewer districts map, etc can be found at: www.westchestergov.com/'Maps ❑ COUNTY ROAD: Applications for development on sites that abut a County road must be submitted for review by the County Department of Public Works. Information and forms can be found at: www.westchestergov.com;dpNv bldgperm.htm. Former County Roads do not need review by the Department of Public Works,but will still likely trigger a review by the County Planning Board. ❑ COUNTY CHANNEL LINES: Applications for development on sites within 100 feet of a designated County Channel Line require a stream control permit from the County Department of Public Works. Information and forms can be found at: www.wcstchestei-gov.coiTl,/dpw/bldgperni.htni ❑ COUNTY PARK: New construction &land alteration projects adjacent to County parks are expected to address screening & buffer of new uses from the park, as appropriate. Stormwater should not drain from a developed site onto a County park without acceptable quantity and quality controls. County parks are designated as Critical Environmental Areas. ❑ SEWAGE TREATMENT AT COUNTY TREATMENT PLANT: Local municipalities are required to reduce and eliminate inflow and infiltration (I&I)into the sanitary sewage systems tributary to County treatment plants.New development will be expected to reduce I&I in relation to generation of new flow at a ratio of three to one. This requirement must be discussed with local officials. ❑BEE-LINE BUS SERVICE: Bee-Line bus stops serving a development site should be identified on plans or noted if located off-site. If a bus stop is located along the site's frontage, the applicant should contact the County Department of Transportation to discuss impacts and the need for improvements. Safe and separate pedestrian access should be provided to link a bus stop and sidewalk with building entrances. Information on County bus service and design guidelines can be found at: westchestergov.com/transportation/images/Bus°/"2OService%2OGttidelines.pdf ❑FAIR AND AFFORDABLE HOUSING: Many municipalities require inclusion of fair & affordable units in new developments. Financial assistance to achieve fair & affordable housing development is available through Westchester County & other sources. Applications that include new residential units to be affirmatively marketed & sold or rented subject to fair & affordable housing provisions should be tied to Westchester County guidelines on affordability including income guidelines of eligible households that can be found at: http://homes.westchestergov.com/. If County funding is sought to develop fair & affordable housing,the County Board of Legislators must be included as an involved agency under SEAR. ❑RECYCLING: New buildings must contain a designated area of sufficient size for separation and storage of recyclables and trash. Building expansions should also include sufficient space for separation and storage of recyclables. For more information about County recycling requirements go to: w,,N,,w.westchestet'gov.com/ejivii-oiiniclit—i-ecycling.htm ❑STORM SEWER SYSTEM: Any connections to a County storm sewer line will require a permit from the Department of Public Works in accordance with the County Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination (IDDE) law. Information & forms can be found at: vv-ww.westchestergov.com/dpw,/bldgperm.httn Non-stormwater discharges to the County storm sewer system are prohibited. III. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS The County Planning BoardA land use policies focus attention on several aspects of development that may have intermunicipal and quality of life impacts. The list below includes areas most frequently commented on by the County Planning Board. ❑WATER: All development plans should include sufficient provisions for stormwater management, water quality measures and mitigation of flooding. ❑Plans should identify the major drainage basin or watershed the site is located in (Croton River, Upper Hudson River, Lower Hudson, Upper Long Island Sound, Bronx River and Lower Long Island Sound). An interactive map with watershed boundaries can be found at w�vw.westcliestergov.com/planning/inaps&lists/drainbasinsI lx 17.htm1 ❑Watershed plans have been developed for several of the CountyF� watersheds - the Croton, Indian Brook-Croton Gorge, Bronx River & Long Island Sound watersheds - that include specific recommendations that apply to development projects. See recommendations in watershed plans at: planning.westchestergov.com/index.php?option=com content&task=view&id= 1231& Item i d-2204 Site Plan Checklist Page 5 of 7 Project Address 21 Berkley Lane ❑Development that involves filling, creation of impervious surfaces or buildings and substantive loss of natural vegetation in a floodplain or flood prone area should be avoided. El Above ground, vegetated retention/detention basins or devices are preferred because they perform better, are easier to inspect and maintain and provide additional environmental benefits over subsurface structural devices. Any such treatments should not be constructed within wetlands or buffer areas around wetlands. ❑The development should treat and retain as much stormwater on-site as possible,particularly when the site is located in a drainage basin with known flooding problems. A Construction Stormwater Toolbox with tools and sources of technical information related to the construction activities and stormwater management best practices is available from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation at: NN--w.dec.ny.gov/chemicaU8694.litml ❑New development should include protection of aquatic resources. For more information about protection of aquatic resourc-es & buffer areas,go to: planning.westchestergov.com;'index.php'?option=com_content&task—view&id=1491&Itcmict=2458 El Impervious cover should be minimized. Permeable paving surfaces should be used where feasible. Vegetative rain gardens should be used, particularly in areas of overland or channelized stormwater flow, to improve stormwater quality and reduce runoff volume. For more information, go to: www.wcstcliestergov.com/stoi-mwatei- ElBuildings along coastlines and low lying area should consider the impacts of sea level rise. Specific consideration is required of potential impacts to surface and subsurface drinking water supplies. ❑ SITE LAYOUT. Aesthetic design,building orientation and community character should be considered in the site layout and building appearance. El In most locations,buildings should face the street and have pedestrian access from the street. ❑Commercial buildings should be located near the front street line with the majority of parking located in the rear of the building. Even gas stations and convenience stores should be upfront in a landscaped setting with parking,pumps and canopy toward the rear. ❑Buildings should be of pedestrian-scale when seen from the sidewalk. ❑Building facades should contribute to and enhance the character of the community. ❑Driveway and pathway connections should be provided to adjacent sites when possible and crosseasements provided. ❑ STREETS. Street design should reduce unwarranted paving and promote connectivity. ❑New streets should connect with adjacent streets wherever feasible to prevent the proliferation of dead-end streets and promote neighborhood integration. ❑Connections could be vehicular or pedestrian/bicycle only,where appropriate. ❑Street widths should be minimized for streets with low traffic volume to reduce speeds and impervious surfaces. Lane widths of 12 feet are only appropriate for major roadways. ❑Driveway widths should be no more than 9 feet to reduce impervious surfaces. El Permeable paving surfaces should be used where feasible. ❑ GREEN TECHNOLOGY.New development should include as many green building elements as possible, such as:renewable building materials, energy efficient heating/cooling systems and fixtures,water saving devices, green roofs and permeable paving surfaces. Information can be obtained from the U.S. Green Building Council at: w1vw.usgbc.org. ❑ LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING. The site improvements should enhance community character. Site Plan Checklist Page 6 of 7 Project Address 21 Berkley Lane ❑ Landscaping should consist of native plant species appropriate for the location. Invasive plant species should be prohibited. Invasive plant information available at: NNrww.westcliestergov.comiplanning/environmental/Reports/lnvasivePlantsBrochOS.pdf ❑ Pollutant tolerant plantings should effectively shield parking, loading areas and refuse collection sites. ❑ Site lighting should be provided at the lowest safe levels and lowest heights,avoiding all spillage off site. ❑ PEDESTRIANS. Safe, convenient and ADA accessible pedestrian access is provided. ❑ A sidewalk should be provided along the site frontage along each street. ❑ Direct pedestrian connections should be made from the front of the building to the sidewalk. Pedestrian crossings of drive-ways& parking lots should be minimized or avoided. If they must be provided,painted crosswalks should be provided through parking lots. ❑ ADA accessibility must be provided. ❑ BICYCLISTS. Provisions for bicyclists should be incorporated into project design. ❑ Bicycle parking should be provided in commercial and residential developments. Guidelines can be found at: www.apbp.oi-g/resource/resmgr/publications/bicycle pat-king_guidelines.pdf ❑ If near a trailway or bicycle route, extra consideration should be given to bicycle accessibility such as bike lanes on internal roadways,bicycle parking and other amenities. ❑ Drive-thru lanes at uses such as banks and fast-food restaurants should also be accessible for bicycles. Waiver: Upon finding by the Building Inspector, Village Engineer, Planning Board or Board of Trustees that, due to the particular character or limited nature of development or change in use or to special conditions peculiar to a site,the submission of a final site plan, or certain portions of information normally required as part of the site development plan, is inappropriate or unnecessary or that strict compliance with said submission requirements will cause extraordinary and unnecessary hardship, such official or Board may waive such submission requirements wherever, in the opinion of such official or Board, such waiver will be consistent with the goal of promoting the public health, safety and general welfare of the community. The findings for granting such waiver shall become a part of the public record. Any waiver request must be made in writing, and include sufficient detailed information for the appropriate authority to make an informed decision. Desian__Professional's Certification,of Completion of Checklist I have fully reviewed the Village of Rye Brook®requirements and certify this application to be a complete submission. I understand that an incomplete plat or incomplete checklist shall be deemed an incomplete submission and shall be returned to the applicant upon determination of such by the appropriate authority. Name(Print) N r)61461 U1 • QD Signature00,0,/ * Ir +rte z 3 15 Date � 14� Wt_Mssjorial Seal Check List 7.12.13 Site Plan Checklist Page 7 of 7 617.20 Appendix C State Environmental Quality Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART I - PROJECT INFORMATION To be completed by Applicant or Project Sponsor) 1. APPLICANTtSpeti3eR 2. PROJECT NAME Langan Engineering 21 Berkley Lane 3. PROJECT LOCATION: Municipality Rye Brook County Westchester 4. PRECISE LOCATION(Street address and road intersections,prominent landmarks,etc.,or provide map) 21 Berkley Lane 5. PROPOSED ACTION IS: ❑ New 2✓ Expansion ✓� Modification/alteration 6. DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY: Remove existing deck, add larger proposed deck and stormwater practice 7. AMOUNT OF LAND AFFECTED: Initially 0.13 acres Ultimately 0.13 acres 8. WILL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER EXISTING LAND USE RESTRICTIONS? ✓� Yes ❑ No If No,describe briefly 9. WHAT IS PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT? P✓ Residential ❑ Industrial Commercial Agriculture ❑ Park/Forest/Open Space Other Describe: 10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL,OR FUNDING,NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY (FEDERAL,STATE OR LOCAL)? ❑Yes ✓❑ No If Yes,list agency(s)name and permit/approvals: 11. DOES ANY ASPECT OF THE ACTION HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL? ❑ Yes F No If Yes,list agency(s)name and permit/approvals: 12. AS A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMIT/APPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION? E] Yes Z No I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORM N PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Applicant/sponsor nam Lan at in n Michael Finan, P.E. Date: �j /,; Signature: If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment OVER 1 Reset PART II - IMPACT ASSESSMENT To be completed by Lead Agency) A. DOES ACTION EXCEED ANY TYPE I THRESHOLD IN 6 NYCRR,PART 617.4? If yes,coordinate the review process and use the FULL EAF. ❑Yes [] No B. WILL ACTION RECEIVE COORDINATED REVIEW AS PROVIDED FOR UNLISTED ACTIONS IN 6 NYCRR,PART 617.6? If No,a negative declaration may be superseded by another involved agency Yes 1:1 No C. COULD ACTION RESULT IN ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING:(Answers may be handwritten,if legible) C1. Existing air quality,surface or groundwater quality or quantity,noise levels,existing traffic pattern,solid waste production or disposal, potential for erosion,drainage or flooding problems? Explain briefly: C2. Aesthetic,agricultural,archaeological,historic,or other natural or cultural resources;or community or neighborhood character?Explain briefly: C3. Vegetation or fauna,fish,shellfish or wildlife species,significant habitats,or threatened or endangered species?Explain briefly: C4. A community's existing plans or goals as officially adopted,or a change in use or intensity of use of land or other natural resources?Explain briefly: C5. Growth,subsequent development,or related activities likely to be induced by the proposed action?Explain briefly: C6. Long term,short term,cumulative,or other effects not identified in C1-05? Explain briefly: C7. Other impacts(including changes in use of either quantity or type of energy)? Explain briefly: D. WILL THE PROJECT HAVE AN IMPACT ON THE ENVIRONMENTAL CHARACTERISTICS THAT CAUSED THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL AREA(CEA)? Yes n No If Yes,explain briefly: E. IS THERE,OR IS THERE LIKELY TO BE,CONTROVERSY RELATED TO POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? 0 Yes F-1 No If Yes,explain briefly: PART III-DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE(To be completed by Agency) INSTRUCTIONS: For each adverse effect identified above,determine whether it is substantial,large,important or otherwise significant. Each effect should be assessed in connection with its (a)setting (i.e. urban or rural); (b)probability of occurring; (c)duration; (d)irreversibility; (e) geographic scope; and (f) magnitude. If necessary, add attachments or reference supporting materials. Ensure that explanations contain sufficient detail to show that all relevant adverse impacts have been identified and adequately addressed. If question D of Part II was checked yes,the determination of significance must evaluate the potential impact of the proposed action on the environmental characteristics of the CEA. F] Check this box if you have identified one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts which MAY occur. Then proceed directly to the FULL EAF and/or prepare a positive declaration. Check this box if you have determined,based on the information and analysis above and any supporting documentation,that the proposed action WILL NOT result in any significant adverse environmental impacts AND provide,on attachments as necessary,the reasons supporting this determination Name of Lead Agency Date Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(If different from responsible officer) Reset BUILDING PERMIT APPLIC K �h ii TRUCTIONS &PROCEDURES BU NT V OK 938 KING S r ,NY 10573 PHONE(914)93 - x(914)939-5801 www.ryebrook.om Applicants seeking an Exterior Building Permit must first obtain approval from the Village Architectural Review Board(ARB). Applicants proposing an addition(s)to an existing 1 or 2 family dwelling which will result in an increase in Gross Floor Area of 50%or greater must also comply with Village Code Chapter 8-13 entitled,"Public Notice".A representative of the applicant must be present at the ARB meeting which is held on the 3rd Wednesday of every month,7:30 p.m.at Village Hall in the main meeting room.Applications must be submitted to the Building Department by no later than the 3rd Wednesday of the month in order to be considered for the next month's agenda.For those properties regulated by a Home Owners Association,written permission by your HOA is required prior to attending the ARB meeting.Please note that the agendas are limited to ten(10)applications per month. Once your application receives ARB approval, it must then be reviewed by the Building Inspector for compliance with all applicable state and local building codes, and for issuance of the permit. DO NOT START CONSTRUCTION UNTIL A PERMIT HAS BEEN ISSUED BY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR. THE ADMINISTRATIVE FEE FOR WORK PROGRESSED OR COMPLETED WITHOUT A PERMIT IS 12%OF THE TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION WITH A MINIMUM FEE OF$600.00 &A MAXIMUM OF$5,500.00 APPLICANT'S INITIAL SUBMISSION TO THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT MUST INCLUDE: 1. A properly completed application with notarized signatures where indicated. 2. Application piling fee: Residential= $75.00 / Commercial= $175.00 (Application fees are non-refundable) 3. Completed & Signed Application Check List 4. Eight (8) sets of dimensioned site plans depicting the location of all existing and proposed buildings and/or addition, alteration, repair, including proposed elevations, floor plans and all existing and proposed property setbacks.Plans must be signed& sealed by a NY State Registered Architect or NY State Licensed Professional Engineer. (The maximum allowable size plans are 36"x42"—NO EXCEPTIONS) 5. Eight (8) copies of a recent survey of the subject property. (A topographic survey is required for any-proposed re-grading or work in a steep slope as defined by Village Code) 6. One (1) electronic copy of the entire application including all plans, surveys, photographs, etc.... 7. Photographs showing front& side views of the existing property as well as photographs of properties on either sides and across the street. 8. Samples of Materials and Finishes. (Sample boards may be presented at the meeting) FOLLOWING APPROVAL BY THE ARB,THE APPLICANT MUST SUBMIT THE FOLLOWING: 1. Full payment of the building permit fee. (see permit fee schedule on the following page) 2. Your contractor's valid Westchester County Home Improvement License. 3. Your contractor's valid proof of liability insurance. (Village ofRyc Brook must be listed as certificate holder) 4. Your contractor's valid proof of workers compensation insurance. (Form#Cl 05.2 or other approved NY State form/or NY State Workers Compensation Waiver) 5. The "Call Before You Dig" (dial 811) dig number. 6. Three (3) sets of sealed construction drawings. (one full-sized set[max.size 36"x42'J and two II"x17"sets) 7. Fire sprinkler systems are required for all new buildings, for additions & alterations to commercial buildings and when finishing a third(3d) floor in a 1 or 2 family dwelling.Any installations of a new, or modification to an existing fire suppression system, (fire sprinkler system,ANSL system,FM-200 system,Type I Hood, etc...)require a separate Automatic Fire Suppression System Permit application & two (2) sets of engineered plans. Fire sprinkler plans must be approved by the Building Inspector prior to the issuance of any permit, and Westchester County Department of Health approval is required for the fire sprinkler system's backflow prevention device. 2/10/2015 BASIC BUILDING PERMITS FEE SCHEDULE: Commercial: $20.00 / $1000.00 of construction cost. Residential: Fee A For new construction & additions less that 800 sq. ft. in size and alterations, decks, patios or other work: $15.00 / $1000.00 of construction cost. Fee B For new construction/additions 800 sq. ft. in size or greater; Total Gross Floor Area x $220.00 x $15.00 / $1000.00 plus any alteration fees from Fee A above. EXPIRATIONS,CODES ®ULATIONS: "A building permit application that is dormant or otherwise inactive shall be deemed abandoned twelve months after the date of its submission to the building department." (§91-2.1.Code of the Village of Rye Brook) "A building permit shall expire six months after its date of issuance if construction has not commenced. If construction has commenced within the six month period as set forth in this subsection, the building permit shall expire 18 months after its date of issuance if all of the proposed work has not been completed or a temporary certificate of occupancy has not been issued. Construction shall be deemed to have commenced when significant construction work on the project, as described on the building permit, has been performed. The Building Inspector shall have the authority to determine whether construction has commenced, and his or her decision shall be final." (§91-2.b.Code of the Village of Rye Brook) Please note that should you fail to properly close out your permit prior to the expiration date in accordance with the law, you will be liable for the $750.00 Administrative Fee in connection with all expired Building Permits issued after January 1, 2003. Please note that this Administrative Fee applies to each individual permit and must be remitted in addition to any other required fees associated with closing the permit, as well as any court imposed fines should a summons be issued. HOURS FOR OPERATION OF CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT Weekdays: 8:00am to 6:00pm or dusk, whichever is earlier. Saturdays: 9:00am to 4:00pm. Sunday& Holidays: NO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY ALLOWED (Holidays Include:News Year Day,January 1st; President's Day,3'd Monday in February;Memorial Day,last Monday in May;Independence Day,July 4'";Labor Day, 1st Monday in September;Thanksgiving Day,4thThursday in November;Christmas Day,December 25th;when the holidays set forth fall on a Sunday,the holiday is observed the next day). (§158-4. Code of the Village of Rye Brook) It shall be the responsibility of the applicant, owner, or person in responsible charge to notify the Building Department at least 48 hours in advance to schedule all required inspections for site work, footings, foundation, drainage, framing, plumbing, electrical, fire blocking, fire suppression, insulation, final or any other required inspection. Please note that electrical inspections are performed by the Village's third-party electrical inspection agency and must be scheduled by your licensed electrician.Electrical certificates, C/O application&fees and the final survey must be submitted prior to scheduling the final inspection. "It shall be unlawful for an owner to use or permit the use of any building or premises or part thereof hereafter created, erected, changed, converted or enlarged, wholly or partly, in its use or structure until a Certificate of Occupancy shall have been issued by the Building Inspector" (§250-10.A.Code of the Village of Rye Brook) Please keep these instruction sheets throughout the duration of the job for reference. 2/10/2015 BUILD MENT VIL OF" :. OK 938 Kirtc T•RYE; NY 10573BR , (914)91 g 39-5801 cvo rQ ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD CHECK LIST FOR APPLICANTS This form must be completed and signed by the applicant of record and a copy shall be submitted to the Building Department prior to attending the ARB meeting. Applicants failing to submit a copy of this check list will be removed from the ARB agenda. Job Address: 21 Berkley Lane Rye Brook, NY 10573 Phone# 914-589-4881 Parcel ID#: 135.35-1-62 Zone: R-15 Date of Submission: 03-11-2015 Proposed Improvement(Describe in detail): We are proposing to remove the existing deck APPLICANT CHECK LIST: The following items must be submitted to the Building addand construct a new, larger deck. We are Department with the application-no exceptions. In w s r w r prac I 1. (X)Completed Application Doug Trokie 2• (X)Eight(8)sets of sealed plans. (ma..size=36". T) Property Owner: 9 3. (X)Eight(8)copies of the property survey. Address: 21 Berkley Lane 4. ()o Eight(8)copies of the proposed site plan. Phone# 914-589-4881 5. (X)One electronic/disc copy of the complete application materials. Applicant appearing before the Board: 6. (X)Filing Fee. Doug Trokie 7. ()Q Any supporting documentation. 8. ( )HOA approval letter. (rfapplicable) Address: 21 Berkley Lane 9. ()Q Photographs. 914-589-4881 10.(X)Samples of finishes/color chart. (a sample board or Phone# model may be presented the night of the meeting) Architect/Engineer: Langan Engineering By signature below, the owner/applicant acknowledges that he/she has read the complete Building Permit Instructions&Procedures,and that their application is complete in all respects.The Board of Review reserves the right to refuse to hear any application not meeting the requirements contained herein. Sworn to before me this 10 Sworn to before me this Ay'of 2015— d 0 ASigpnat 4.ofPWperty0w—iTe, ature Applicant r 7, U&LADS S Uk, �� ccs S , G � Prin of Property Owner 4Name of Applicant b' C-iF=GRD G. XLEINBAUNA fJolary t'-rblic State of d} New York Notan � No. 0:.1L-i197775 Nevv y State 4f Oualirierl in v\1-.stcl,aster County No. 02KL-72rk tJualifieq in �hesler 97,77.5 Commis,;ion Expires October 31, 20_ Comrnrssron Expires Courtfy October 37 2/10/2b1 p— BUILDING DEPARTMENT VILL OOK 938 KING T RYE BR ,NY 10573 (914)9668 FAx(91 9-5801 .I ebrook. 198 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: Approval Date: Permit # :Application # Approval Signature: : ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD: Disapproved: :Date: BOT Approval Date: Case # :Chairman: PB Approval Date: Case # :Secretary: ZBA Approval Date: Case # Other: Application Fee: Permit Fees: Exterior Building Permit Application Application dated: 03-11-2015 is hereby made to the Building Inspector of the Village of Rye Brook,NY,for the issuance of a Permit for the construction of buildings,structures,additions,alterations or for a change in use,as per detailed statement described below. 1. JobAddress: 21 Berkley Lane Rye Brook, NY 10573 2. Parcel ID#: 135.35-1-62 Zone: R-15 3. Proposed Improvement(Describe in detail): We are proposing to remove the existing deck and construct a new, larger deck. We are adding a new s ormwa er practice. 4. Property owner: Doug Trokie Address: 21 Berkley Lane Rye Brook, NY 10573 Phone# 212-964-1661 Cell# 914-589-4881 e-mail dtrokie@tlesq.com List All Other Properties Owned in Rye Brook: Applicant: Doug Trokie Address: 21 Berkley Lane Rye Brook, NY 10573 Phone# 212-964-1661 Cell# 914-589-4881 e-mail dtrokie@tlesq.com Architect: Justin Minieri Address: 55 Webster Avenue New Rochelle, NY 10802 Phone# 914-576-7087 Cell# 914-424-9646 e-mail tracepaper@aol.com Engineer: Langan Engineering Address: 707 Westchester Ave., Suite 304 White Plains, NY 10604 Phone# 914-323-7400 cell# e-mailmfinan@langan.com General Contractor: Address: Phone# Cell# e-mail (1) 2/4/2015 5. Occupancy;(I-Fani.,2-Fam.,Commercial.,etc...)Pre-construction: 1-Fam. Post-construction: 1-Fam. 6. Area of lot: Square feet: 17,231 Acres: 0,40 7. Dimensions from proposed building or structure to lot lines: front yard: 35.96 Ft rear yard: 65.08 Ft right side yard: 25.43 Ft left side yard: 27.47 Ft other: 8. If building is located on a corner lot,which street does it front on: N/A 9. Area of proposed building in square feet: Basement:1,359 S Fj s' fl: 1,359 S F2"J fl: 1,263 SF-3 rd fi 10. Tota I Square Footage of the proposed new construction: 3,981 SF 11. For additions,total square footage added:Basement: 43 SF 19i fl: 351 SF 2"d fl: 227 SF P fl: 12. Total Square Footage of the proposed renovation to the existing structure: 621 SF 13. N.Y.State Construction Classification: Ce- N.Y.State Use Classification: t/ "L Fil MAI 14. ;C7truction Type&Location:()Typical Western Lumber Frame;()Timber Frame JTCJ; ood Truss JTTJ;e-engineered wood JPWJ; Located;()Floor Framing JFJ;()Roof Framing IRI;w(loor&Roof Framing JFRJ; Other: 15. Number of stories: 2 verall Height: Median Height: t*7 16. Basement to be full,or partial: u , fi ished r unfini hed: �7 17. What material is the exterior finish: 18. Roof style; peaked,hip,mansard,shed,etc: Roofing material: As!pha +I-,- 19. What system of heating: 1, 06LrM a i r 20. If private sewage disposal is necessary,approval by the Westchester County Health Department must be submitted with this application. 21. Will the proposed project require the installation of a new,or an extension/modification to an existing automatic fire suppression system?(Fire Sprinkler,ANSL System,FM-200 System,Type I Hood,etc...)Ves:—No: X (ifyes,applicant must submit a separate Automatic Fire Suppression System Permit application&2 sets of detailed engineered plans) 22. Will the proposed project disturb 400 sq.ft.or more of land,or create 400 sq.ft.or more of impervious coverage requiring a Stormwater Management Control Permit as per§217 of Village Code? Yes:—No: X Area: 371 SF 23. Will the proposed project require a Site Plan Review by the Village Planning Board as per§209 of Village Code? Yes: X No: (ifyes,applicant must submit a Site Plan Application,&provide detailed drawings) 24. Will the proposed project require a Steep Slopes Permit as per§213 of Village Code Yes: No: X (ifyes,you must submit a Site Plan Application,&provide a detailed topographical survey) 25. Is the lot located within 100 ft.of a Wetland as per§245 of Village Code? Yes: No: X (ifyes,the area of wetland and the wetland buffer zone must be properly depicted on the survey&site plan) 26. Is the lot or any portion thereof located in a Flood Plane as per the FIRM Map dated 9/28/07? 1 es: No: X (ifyes,the area and elevations of thefloodplane must be properly depicted on the survey&site plan) 27. Will the proposed project require a Tree Removal Permit as per§235 of Village Code?Yes: X No: (ifyes,applicant must submit a Tree Removal Permit Application) 28. Does the proposed project involve a Home-Occupation as per§250-38 of Village Code? Yes: No: X Indicate:TIER I: TIER Il: TIER I11: (ifyes,a Home Occupation Permit Application is required) 29. What is the total estimated cost of construction: $ Note:estimated cost shall include all site improvements,labor,material,scaffolding,fixed equipment,professional fees,including any material and labor which may be donated gratis.If the final cost exceeds the estimated cost,an additional fee will be required prior to issuance of the C/O. 30. Estimated date of completion: (2) 2/4/2015 BUILDING DEPARTMENT VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK 938 KING STRIE 'r Rvr BROOK,NY 10573 (914)939-0668 FAx(914) 939-5801 RESIDENTIAL LOT AREA COVERAGE Address: 21 Berkley Lane Section: 135.15 Block: 1 Lot: 62 PERMITTED COVERAGE RATIOS IN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS (Local Law 3-88) YOUR ZONE AREA IN MAIN ACCESS. DECK ZONE DISTRICT SQ. FEET BLDG. BLDG. MAX. (CHECK) MAX. R-25 25,000 14% 3.5% 4% R-20 20,000 14% 3.5% 4% X R-15 15,000 16% 3.5% 4% R-15A 15,000 12% 3.5% 4% R-12 12,500 17% 4% 4% R-10 10,000 20% 4.5% 3.5% R-7 7,500 23% 4.5% 3.5% R-5 5,000 30% 5% 3.5% R-2F 5,000 30% 5% 3.5% Existing: Proposed: 1. AREA OF LOT 17,231 Sq. Ft. 17,231 Sq. Ft. 2. AREA OF HOUSE a. Coverage of Main Building (Including Attached Garage or Accessory Building) 1,368 Sq. Ft. 1,497 Sq. Ft. b. Area of 1s`Floor Divided By Area of Lot x 100 6 % 8 3. AREA OF ACCESSORY BUILDING (Includes Detached Garages, Tool Shed, Playhouses) Sq. Ft. Sq. Ft. a. Coverage of Accessory Building Area of Accessory Building Divided By Area of Lot x 100 % % 4. AREA OF DECK 367 Sq. Ft. 504 Sq. Ft. a. Coverage of Deck r of ck Divided By Area of Lot x 100 2 % 3 % I he be of my knowledge and belief,the above information is correct. Archi ct's Sign ture (3) 2/10/2015 BUILDING DEPARTMENT VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK 938 KING STREET RYE BROOK,NY 10573 (914) 939-0668 Fax(914) 939-5801 IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE RATIOS RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS Address: 21 Berkley Lane Section: 135.15 Block: 1 Lot: 62 Zone: R-15 IMPERVIOUS SURFACES (Definition): All buildings, as defined herein, and all areas on the ground or elevated above the ground which are comprised of materials through which water cannot readily flow, including, but not limited to asphalt, concrete, masonry, wood, gravel and clay, and which consist of elements including, but not limited to, court yards, sports courts,swimming pools, patios, sidewalks, ramps, terraces and driveways. TOTAL MAXIMUM PERMITTED MAX. PERMITTED COVERAGE Zoning IMPERVIOUS LOT AREA BY IMPERVIOUS SURFACES District COVERAGE IN FRONT (sq.ft.) For Base Lot For Lot Area YARD(%) Area(sq.ft.)* Over Base R-25 20 Lot Area(%) R-20 30 0 to 4,000 0 55 R-15 35 4,001 to 6,000 2,200 35 6,001 to 12,000 2,900 27 R-15A 35 12,001 to 16,000 4,520 26 R-12 40 16,001 to 20,000 5,560 25 R-10 45 20,001 to 30,000 6,560 24 30,001 to 40,000 8,960 23 R-7 40 40,001 & larger 11,260 22 R-5 30 R2-F 30 *"Base Lot Area" is the minimum end of the lot size range in the f°Lot Area"column Area of lot: 17,231 sq.ft. Existing Allowed Proposed Total impervious coverage = 3,263 S .ft. 5868 Sq. ft. 3,634 S .ft. Front impervious coverage = 18 % 35 % 22 % e t best of my knowledge and belief, the above information is correct. Archit c s Sig ature (4) 2/10/2015 BUILDING DEPARTMENT VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK 938 KING STREET RY1:BROOK,NY 10573 (914)939-0668 FAX(914)939-5801 BULK REGULATIONS IN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS Address: 21 Berkley Lane Section: 135.15 Block: 1 Lot. 62 MAXIMUM GROSS FLOOR AREA USE FORMULA: Maximum Gross Floor Area = 4,000 + [ (Lot Area —21,780) x 0.11478421 ]: a. Allowed = 3,477 Sq. Feet b. Existing = 3,290 Sq. Feet c. Proposed = 3,981 Sq. Feet HEIGHT/SETBACK RATIOS FOR RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS DEFINITION: A standard designed to regulate the height of a building in relation to the average grade of the corresponding portion of the lot line from which it is set back. The ratio modifies the maximum permitted Height of Building by forming an inclined plane beginning at the average grade along the portion of the lot line from which the setback is measured and rising toward the building at the specified ratio above which no part of any building, other than minor architectural features such as chimneys, skylights and dormer windows not covering more than 10%of the entire roof area, shall be permitted to extend. Height and Setback shall be calculated using the formula; Heiclht/Setback =X, where X is the required side or front yard ratio for the zoning district in which a property is located as specified in Article VIII of Chapter 250. A complete elevation view for the proposed improvement must be included on the drawings. FILL IN YOUR RATIOS: ZONE EX/ST/NG PROPOSED REQU/RED FRONT: FRONT: FRONT: .48 R--25 SIDE: SIDE: SIDE: 1.30 FRONT: FRONT: FRONT: .60 R-20 SIDE: SIDE: SIDE: 1.60 FRONT: 0.45 FRONT: 0.45 FRONT: .60 R-15 SIDE: 0,85 SIDE: 0.855 SIDE: 1.60 FRONT: FRONT: FRONT: .80 /715A SIDE: SIDE: SIDE: 2.40 FRONT: FRONT: FRONT: .69 RL 12 SIDE: SIDE: SIDE: 1.60 FRONT: FRONT: FRONT: .80 1?-10 SIDE: SIDE: SIDE: 2.40 FRONT: FRONT: FRONT: .96-- R-7 SIDE: SIDE: SIDE: 3.00 FRONT: FRONT: FRONT: 1.20 -5 SIDE: SIDE: SIDE: 4.00 FRONT: FRONT: FRONT: 1.20 SIDE: SIDE: SIDE: 4.00 attest to he best of y knowledge and belief, the above information is correct. Architect' Signature (5) 2/10/2015 ILLUSTRATION OF HEIGHT / SETBACK RATIO Setback Line for Maximum Height I / REAR I Minimum I I / Setback Line I c. c Ia d rn9a 0.0W a 0 a ;r v�o. p p u4) o. v 3 —a` rn HOUSE rn 3 !^0. POTENTIAL = c .40,c c � c BUILDING Eo _ _ 2 Qom/ ENVELOPE E ¢G ¢G a R FRONT Area in which Average Grade is Measured STREET Average Grade Along Property Line at Property Line ELEVATION PLAN Table R301.20) 2010 RCNYS CLIMATIC & GEOGRAPHIC DESIGN CRITERIA FOR RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS IN RYE BROOK GROUND- WIND SPEED SEISMIC DESIGN FROST LINE WINTER DESIGN ICE SHIELD FLOOD AIR FREEZING SNOW LOAD (mph) CATEGORY WEATHERING DEPTH TERMITE DECAY TEMP UNDERLAYMENT HAZARDS INDEX REDUIRED 20 Pg 100/110 C SEVERE 42" MODERATE SUGHTTO 7 YES FIRM Map GIB TO HEAVY MODERATE 313101]0279F 9/28/07 (5a) 2/10/2015 This application must be properly completed in its entirety by a N.Y. State Registered Architect or N.Y. State Licensed Professional Engineer&signed by those professionals where indicated. It must also include the notarized signature(s) of the legal owner(s) of the subject property, and the applicant of record in the spaces provided. Any application not properly completed in its entirety and/or not properly signed shall be deemed null and void, and will be returned to the applicant. Please note that application fees are non-refundable. ********************************************************************************************************** STATE OF NEW YORK,COUNTY WESTCHESTER ) as: "60 U&Llk S .'Ti K 167 ,being duly sworn, deposes and states that he/she is the applicant above named, (print name of individual signing as the applicant) and further states that (s)he is the legal owner of the property to which this application pertains, or that (s)he is the for the legal owner and is duly authorized to make and file this application. (indicate architect,contractor,agent,attorney,etc.) That all statements contained herein are true to the best of his/her knowledge and belief, and that any work performed, or use conducted at the above captioned property will be in conformance with the details as set forth and contained in this application and in any accompanying approved plans and specifications,as well as in accordance with the New York State Uniform Fire Prevention&Building Code, the Code of the Village of Rye Brook and all other applicable laws,ordinances and regulations. Sworn to before me this ly Sworn to before me this �y day of cc 20 l day of C2 201—r, Signa a of Property Twn6r Signatuy of Applicant �bo ct&-L 5 S .Tl6 t_- (6 Print ame'of Property Owner Print f Applicant 3I�o (S 3 10 No otary. CUA-FORD G. KLEINBAUM CLIFFORD G. Notary Public state of KLUINBAUM Ne�•,� York Public State of No. 02Yi_i297775 New York n;ialified in 1'%:::acliestoi County No. 02f<L-7297775 Comn:issie Exhi;es, Octoi�er 31, 20L Oualified in Westcliesler County Commission Expires October 31, 204- (6) 04(6) 2.10.15 BUILT TMENT V GE OF Ry OOK 938 K _ REET RYE BR' ,NY 10573 (914) 668 FAx 939-5801 rg FOR OFFICE USE ONLY: Building Permit#: Issued: Approval Date: Permit#: Permit Fee: 5150.00/Trailer: Approval Signature: Renewal Fee: 5100.00/Trailer: Expiration Date: Renewed Expiration Date: TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER APPLICATION Application dated: ,is hereby made to the Building Inspector for the issuance of a Permit to place a Temporary Construction Trailer on public or private property in accordance with Chapter 186-6.E.of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook. 1. Address: Parcel ID#: 2. Number of Trailers&Proposed Location(s): 3. Property Owner: Address: Phone: 4. Owner of Trailer: Address: Phone: 5. Trailer Leased To: Address: Phone: 6. Will the trailer require plumbing? No:_Yes:_Describe: 7. Will the trailer require electricity? No:_Yes:_Describe: Please note that this application must include the notarized signature(s)of the legal owner(s)of the above-mentioned property, in the space provided below.Any application not bearing the legal property owner's notarized signature(s) shall be deemed null and void, and will be returned to the applicant. STATE OF NEW YORK,COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER ) as: ,being duly sworn,deposes and states that he/she is the applicant above named, (print name of individual signing as the applicant) and further states that (s)he is the legal owner of the property to which this application pertains, or that (s)he is the for the legal owner and is duly authorized to make and file this application. (indicate architect,contractor,agent,attorney,etc.) That all statements contained herein are true to the best of his/her knowledge and belief,and that any work performed,or use conducted at the above captioned property will be in conformance with the details as set forth and contained in this application and in any accompanying approved plans and specifications,as well as in accordance with the New York State Uniform Fire Prevention&Building Code,the Code ofthe Village of Rye Brook and all other applicable laws,ordinances and regulations. Sworn to before me this Sworn to before me this day of , 20 day of , 20 Signature of Property Owner Signature of Applicant Print Name of Property Owner Print Name of Applicant Notary Public Notary Public 6.1.2014 BUILD 1lP For office use only: EENT nn PERMIT# VILAGE OF RYE'; OK ISSUED: 938 KING STREE RYE BROOK, YORK 10573 DATE: (914)9 -FAx 939-5801 FEE: PAID 0 o .or APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY / COMPLIANCE AND CERTIFICATION OF COSTS It shall be unlawful for an owner to use or permit the use of any building or premises or part thereof hereafter created, erected, changed, converted or enlarged,wholly or partly, in its use or structure until a certificate of occupancy shall have been issued by the Building Inspector. §250-10.A.Code of the Village of Rye Brook Address: Occupancy/Use: Parcel ID#: Zone: Owner: Address: P.E./R.A. or Contractor: Address: Person in responsible charge: Address: Application is hereby made and submitted to the Building Inspector of the Village of Rye Brook for the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy/Certificate of Compliance for the structure herein mentioned in accordance with law: STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER as: being duly sworn,deposes and says that he/she resides at (Print Name of Applicant) (No.and Street) in in the County of in the State of that (City/Town/Village) he/she has supervised the work at the location indicated above, and that the actual total cost was: for the construction,alteration or repair of: Deponent further states that he/she has examined the approved plans of the structure herein referred to for which a Certificate of Occupancy / Compliance is sought, and that to the best of his/her knowledge and belief, the structure has been erected in accordance with the approved plans and any amendments thereto except in so far as variations therefore have been legally authorized, and as erected complies with the laws governing building construction. Sworn to before me this Sworn to before me this day of , 20 day of 20 Signature of Property Owner Signature of Applicant Print Name of Property Owner Print Name of Applicant Notary Public Notary Public 6.1.2014 If you're working on homes,schools or day care centers built pre-1978,you now must be EPA Lead-Safe Certified. WHAT The Lead-Based Paint Renovation,Repair and Painting (RRP)rule is a federal regulatory program affecting anyone who disturbs painted surfaces where lead may be present. ' ' ' •Submit an application to certify your firm for five years. •A one-day class will certify your renovators for five years. •Learn the required steps to contain the work area, minimize dust and thoroughly clean up every day. 1 WHO •Any contractor,including renovators,electricians,HVAC specialists,plumbers,painters and maintenance staff, who disrupts more than six square feet of lead paint in pre-1978 homes,schools,day care centers and other places where children spend time. ' WHY 1.Avoid risk of government fines and civil liability: -Without certification and by not following approved practices,you and your company can face tens of thousands of dollars in fines and put yourself and your company at risk of potential lawsuits. 2.Protect your workers,yourself and your customers from a health risk: -Dust from renovation,repairs and painting can contaminate an entire home and,if inhaled or ingested,can cause irreversible damage to children ApIr and adults. 3.Gain competitive advantage: -Certification makes you stand out from others and positions you as a professional contractor consumers MW can trust.Using your company's certification in your marketing materials may help attract business. -Consumers will look for the certification before hiring contractors and may be more accepting of additional costs and time associated with doing the job safely. -Upon certification of your firm,your company will be listed as a Lead-Safe Certified Contractor on the EPA website,giving your firm the potential for GET LEAD-SAFE CERTIFIED BY APRIL 22, 2010. new customers. WHERE To find an accredited trainer in your local area or get additional info,go to epa.gov/getleadsafe or call 800-424-LEAD. \�/E PA :,EPA WHEN • Now—Certification requirements begin April 22,2010. _ .:.0."94.'\e�F rar.�A _�, �� >1E" = r •.�;_�} Aw /IW.3111W - ', •Li — _ , af�i -I w IT t +b � T tir -�' �� •�� �, ... � '+� yam. '�.•.z � .ate. :,. �.i., IY � 1 P` 2! t ■t ss — 1J__ - r ■ • r ■ r r r ■P 1 rW ri 4 1',N t. �Ll'S'•. • ,ask, ... 0ilso 0�r_ x � �,.•,.• ��F.r 1i •T+:-. .5`r•^•µt ,.~, � .. _7 LJ tie � 4 s q '.•c a z�'.''w'"•a�.�. k � �'��'� � is �r%v' � t moo y � Nq IJ low I J "�`.' •r',, '"3',,14: 9' n`.ice„} h -•e _ �.�, Y - �t�-"� M-101:4 10 . . � . . 1 i tuy _ -- r_ Fie Ll Ak -.Ifs •, _ 3 t +V �p Y ,� s `mow ti�•�, �, y._ y ,r � V , Y Nix NOW 45, El a Y.' EJ L t f — Y( f t 1 l�Ni. �Yc 2 5 a E 7 B z SITE PLAN APPROVAL DRAWINGS FOR 21 BERKLEY LANE VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK WESTCHESTER COUNTY, NEW YORK e G o 0r` Po 000 T o 0 ElISIONS o < o �Z KER OR NameE 11H PIAN.PE LEER A saN S111E LIC N.,81113 BIRCH LN LANGAN LOCATION MAP r'=iso' 21 BERKLEY LANE E S-t2 D.H, Own /.]ICOnt Architect Civil Em—, SELTON 135.35,BLOOC Nu 1,LOT Na 62 ereo oao xreswie 5w VILLAGEOFRYEBILL— wn�e vio�.rvr iosoa WESTCHESTER--yRY YORK xre eaak,rvr ias» rve•worn"ii".rvr 10 2 Drawing Tltla DRAWING LIST COVER SHEET Date CS001 wK 2 nu11 TI 11 D111IT—1EEn.onvrEa-i=SLbmission Date the 1 1 Fuename rriangancomraoratmtaoraTtiaoouToircoaav D-^19 11.1,1 11,1\S11z 11- "=l an9 0 -3/s/rzms T z 3 ° 7e 2 TABLE OF DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS ZONING DISTRICTR-15 : E-1 uses1' aesiaenual aesaenYal e GENERAL NOTES ,FAE111 resT „R SRE I F 103 n: sres, AN,res, �I�ca olemeter us A AA[rveENAaTEns AN aAaA 2.—T AAOIIII ANN ILTElunory Eo A°Bw I TIOL '� Par INI,EIIIN 3,°iT SF .,°R SF sabaapen Spaw %T FINII ASTR<T - 135.35-1-63 ANLAENETEEEAAA TA ^EANN SR,s H 160, 1361.65i,.a°o, se ie, AAAAN,E BEO wTn.AFF'E,AAEUENI PARA TAG Ey NSFALLNN TAVEAL THE ° I Now or Formerly arU,.; e AE, �.�,.°,EA 11-I°., ap aaA A Joseph&Shirley Camillo BUILDING °F(4 FTo,ao Ft(48.RN) Fo IlC1 IN T11 , 11AEA FE E1.11 FE v7NEFa ILL eE 1EuouEA��+Me srE AT TAe A I NAA, OENT TN 1�T° T.N N .Ell FINE T �NN�N T w A Filed Map Lot 20 oe���wa�se A ae� AAA. ' A, EAON �A E LLoa DLL EAE E rs A AaEA �a o mAn°A,A reTA�AA�a hAm ^°aAA a,°�AAAAA Trem �A r e A EEN AEA aT° A o E�°mE E P.NTA NAE N E�^AAA F.M.#13464 NorBs a,a A,A A An1-11-A-1-11 Eare„AA,Am,AA, Ell,A,mA,A 6T^EAT�A L T�Ary�A�NE wAAE^n^a�E AAAAT A as M�� E3, iFl— TIE . �,T�N°ANG EG%ARFA s,`;PsIEFUllAAE1n � EAA.11 „aBTsFwa�NNAEAs,a�1,« AA EA�MVEAA,AA AA < e AAAVANEA AES SEA-sAA -� NETSNARE E N SNA. AAA A »,nE^E mLL AE�E. ^AAN SAM sTA w°tea N AA T A NET �NAAE�N SMA,ANA AE«AAa,N ass TNS°AA 11 135.43-1-6 ,a o`in.i ----AE P�°g1 I.9A,A AAEa.FA�na�EE,�ANTAA;`inFAA Now or Formerly ANT,AAA�NTALAEEA A. I o \� TAX LOT 62LU Mitchell Jay Greenspan&Caryn Cherlin �-ao RIII ERe A c 9 FLU Filed Map Lot 18 FILED MAP LOT V F.M.#13464 AAA q '=sGME'lp .E F.M.#13464ITE I 3 a P—El-L' m 17,230.583 Sq.Ft. _ °�NE.k -0.396 Acres n «B«c� .eE�«o., =;: swE." - �`.RD -I w 72 .EOLW A NE... �', o 2STORY l FRAME - LU 'Ell SI ON S RESIDENCE #21 / A' a�'A A RE�s,�,E,EA - `° - N ��A 6 I NAT SI ..s I ueE iw,a EvmAN.LIC NIE., 81113 DATE �AswA PgLD F\ � � - aAA 5 � I s AN LANGAN =.—,E.. HL -- ----- --- BERKLEY LANECMB ------------ 21 BERKLEY LANE ILA 12 ANNALI E reiu=iaASA I SRTION 1335,BLOOC Nu 1,lDT Na 63 My i I VIEIAOE OF RYE BROOK WESICHESIER COUNT NEW YORK ————i�[oaemm IL ^ T 1111 -----------------------6-- ------ ELL 12 LAYOUTAND ss'°F,e., I Pa I I\ ZONING PLAN 135.43-1-7 I I Now or Formerly me=�I,E_ NA. Norman Berkowitz&George Garfunkel I 2 °otey U—8,Rens d a u CS 101 Fikd Map Lot 16 �Y F.M.#13464 E111 TI 11 TAAFTER N^ Am;AA;AA Ame E 1188: �� wAASAAAAm:AA�A:��AALA.vAA�«A�:rona �,-1AAE..A�:Nn��T���LsnA owi iA^190Aeaam-�m-oA�� L..1/ ems, z 5 a 6 7 R z i i \ \ I -- — — --�-- — --� zea as �a.�E P, s. i2°1°° ,aoaai x °EE �\ �\ It IU 1,Ell 1- .M�REaIX�cwm[o I rib.,REE asn I I TREES TO BE REMOVED A.GINE virvE r��O �S9¢.2o Poo ' t, J Sif K'rpKo , P IiaEE — 2 STORY /— \ 21 ;", NLs EPS o FRAME — _ EIGIONS �E�mE u`93si RESIDENCE N �Rsza a„z _ #21 ° 21- — NaT eE DATE SIGNED viNnN.Pem icRaeL Leeo STATE LIC 81173 � H oZ , ,a L4NGAN RE 11°E s� El EG I BERKLEY _;� �--_ — —�' AN p I i �E� — — —— LANE —, 4_�--�— ° — --y--1-- /,aa 21 BERKLEY LANE i E �mnoi2 16 REE aweme�, - o xX111 reiu=iaAsa ]Ea , SRTION 13535,BLOCK Nu 1,lDT No.62 VILIAGF OF RYE BROOK b El WFSTCHESfEKCWNIY EW YORK o S w�aa sa.a.c oo,�coaeme� ———— —pe-ea-— Drawing TiUa EX EXISTING ------------- ---- '� CONDITIONS AND „ ooE 2S°reap=, SITE REMOVAL s I PLAN Dale � °,2°” CD101 nu�iai lEE0.ionLiER=S,°mi�ssYn Dat AS Fuename RRianganmmRaora 2wa2aara¢2isoou¢oi�eaaa o w N°aa ¢ai 2sneeiniexRme aeon t�¢misston�soo2¢¢oi-emm-mo¢an9n o -3/s/rzm s T z 7-7-7— 1— --F-->— i s 6 7 E Z _ o L,R »A I, I 2 z. \ A I qas TREE 2 STORY DECK OV L° 1 STORY FRAME RESIDENCE ° FRAME I� SECTION A—A' #21 112 IR II ° SCALE r'=10'Ft RILL I �A,1, 1^=s'v 1—LOPI I 'LL 11 211 �oPrva� , s ,—�IEI ° r as a �oR mC, , a 1 R°IAl LED I I � � 1 r I Ass IEVISIONS a,RE. EXISTING STEEP SLOPES V > I 1-17 NaruREMICHAEL L N FINAL.PE LE D A SIGNED \` � �. I � EXISTING SLOPES WITHIN PROPERTY LI\'[ a° °,a Nl.Ell MIN SLOPE SLOPE AREA sF COLOR J Qo o, I I LANGAN 1.=..�9 N 2 STORY < p'. FRAME RESIDENCE PROPOSED STEEP SLOPES #21 iasis 21 BERKLEY LANE PROPOSED SLOPES WITHIN PROPERTY LINE E i "R i,re I - ' SECEION 13535,BLOCK Nu 1,lDT Na 62 UMBER MN.SLOPE MAK SLOPE AREA(SF) COLOR s. %rg s I VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK 0.0a I5.0% xoi 5 s /'J �'u9m' aomc eB WBTGHESTHt COUNTY EW YOIIX a .Ot Ir ll ` browing lila N 3 zso� 21 AC �;e6P ■ �� s -- �I EXISTING AND • PROPOSED STEEP °!°° s SLOPES PLAN E 112,11 1 EP 111 71 wire _Yl9WRy,2 �ILR„ CD102 nu�ioi iEEa.on,r,a-�SLLmiETt Fuename LLianganmm�Deco LwaLearaEALi°oouAoiLeaaa o w N°°az a°i LsneeiniexLme aeon t��misston�s°o2aaoi-emm-m°imnn o -3/s/rzm s, z 5 a 6 7 5 z EX.AVERAGE GRADE CALCULATION e I I Ekvae°n eE4v o yE4v I I 14 \\ \ ` ,953 ,9aA 1991 247 \ TAiedD 192., 1A. \, i 135.35-1-63 A" EaGRAOE „>5 Now or Formerly I I PROP.AVERAGE GRADE CALCULATION \ Joseph&Shirley Camillo 141 14 \ Filed Map Lot 20 21 F.M.#13464 211 11411 1� 3a4n°4°0 6, AVEtl s'RADE 1 ,b Na�33.annamama°w a nemn,ar, ` s� _` STORMWATER a�5 a44i ,1°,BEE ` s. CALCULATIONS s 135.43-1-6 i aF I 9 1 TITIL �a°��E4 a.DwaEw,. Now or Formerly ( '°� arvI 1I'TIEE 11 . N,1°.` Mitchell Jay Greenspan&Caryn Cherlin m 3'a C \ s N���°`° uj �� Lu —NE Filed Map Lot 18 „va° za s I 1 F.M.#13464 N .d. JJJ YB��— xEEuxrtR AS NE¢5 �0 O wM=i aloe 9n�usx g \ °°c aiNE r ..-2 op 2 S I vn 1 i I EL e r e F..: �'F p FRAME atF w��� 1..r RESIDENCE aoeoe�wwwe ° s3a \ " NRERS W u z °a.- YYNIV R C �.0 a—� 11111TUREM 1—H RIAN.PE LEED o °jheL con TAi I 145 4,a �V Off( �, A� 19• � ONBFLON i Li 5 E LC.Nu 8 3 LANGAN B/ D �E���.EY �a „ A9° ° V,w I j 21 BERKLEY LANE E LANE �]` J"�I ` ` x y � __ _ — leas SECEION 13535,BLOCK-1,LOT Nw 62 avanalt awvm°°, ,zEE ss. aro �a•�E�°s+u°uunw[ x,esaa 0.iu_�easa aa9 vT111VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK ,z n cA° siaav wail m°i a ° °Yu'NvN.K1BlR 1J; ' av ay.cava uvo A,s sa �un I ie las i Drawl 9 ESTER COUNTY NEW YORK ,s �.-2. Eac s'wav seer s Doom Lc pnv � r a -1-- GRADING AND ------- ---- ------------- a STORMWATER 12 Da.E I PLAN DI-Ig Dale IeIAND1— 2015 CG 101 nu�ial iEEa.DnlrEa-�SLDmIssYn Dat 1— IEIT 11--\4an9anmm\°ora\wa\°arca\isDDuaDi\c°aa o w v`i9aazaaai\sne iniex\me aeon t°vmissto P\�oo2aaoi_eclm ymoi myei g AnesLloism 9er1°I°° z a 4 s 7 e 2 e VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK TREE PROTECTION NOTES SnALL Rf uRE RE[ NEo aME.. «E _ I E�.,,aE NE,A«ED EEE 1 EIIR ERE_.,,EE P,FIED 11TINE o�aa4.EE,Eo�E�EEa,�oti IFIIE�TED,ITIITIE=��Pao,EITED IR� —� �.�aa°o�atiE��:°E�Row��� °o�ERM��ENDNa�°�Qo�� ol= 135.35-1-631.Eoti a1E.�ou 11.�I�.�EE s1,LL eE�M.Eo�a,EE.—LA— E, ama" ky°Eo Now or Formerly _\` Joseph&Shirley Camillo CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE I ` - Filed Map Lot 20 F.M.#13464 Roy�EllT� �tiI1EE.�DN 11ILL aE� E aa�oa,o I.NTINIINE e IE P11, ll-111 NLIANNIF4UINPILEEo as EsaE aLL o,Ea E.D NE a D E D Moo��owN 11ALLL IF —= —T- — --��-- ----- I TE aE EEo.DH DHR �,.Eu a E ill 1, -E x/ E4 0AlAls GENERAL NOTES 135.43-1-6 ��as ! a �a3 of A ss MEAS FILL FN THI 111E �,'E EA of oluRa�� �H ESE a DE Now or Formerly EaE,Pu ����� 1 Lu Mitchell Jay Greenspan&Caryn Cherlin m �' .� r�'IIEII \\ - L Filed Map Lot 18 s n * �Y �0,- �X! F.M.#13464 s VA e i rteA h I a n aim sow_ V I m 11 FAIINm _E o 2 STORY C' FRAME I1�V\� .a�,e.l mEE�FE°�`E�,� v� LuN4. cNs��N i R osE E$DENCE I' �+� i �eE.E. DFEMiaEE EwnN.PE EEED V' `O BSFF� s14.E uc.No.81413 e . r � �° � =✓-' o' LL#21 ,039, N I as Edon;� � _ toNGA N FLII I IF 11 • E I JEwF I ,ti \ ,q9 �a5 it �� tori „�� •I �� ..,,NE � I � a /-' - A� �a s � I I � E I .___J J, � N neESE E .�^' �« 21 BERKLEY LANE E BERKLEY R 213 Wu I T 7 VR GE OF RYE BROOK L/��IE _ _ —t ���_— _ _ __ IF wTNnRDDNY N�YDRK 1 E INLEE me 6. '`I9°� �� browing la �_ —i_ _1 L_ _ __ _�__� I I � m EROSION CONTROL AND CONSTRUCTION o=a�E��ee�aaK,Easa �a�M MANAGEMENT PLAN r----------------- —Ill 12 IF ----- �szs"«:eE oaIee,, _ 9 e>�D�.,v�o,= CE101 Da �v nu�ioi lEE0.ionLiER=511 blYIi Nill Date M \ SY eet riienamz��iangon mm Eaaw�aEaawa�isao2uaiEmaa oaia wi9an��ai Esnee�rnes�ti�e aeon s.nmiszi14 4190uzer..�nang 5trie,o3ie.--6Esism 9.5E5c z 3 a s T e 2 e RLEEA Sao n°N o°E"E EN3a M", i STP PLN eR1A AR APPRaaEA EaaAL NI o .AP�°, TauDIEE aE RaP",„, PaF°IDT IN"°ETauIT°aI A RD ° N P o A "d 11REA P T R oR sEEAEA �� TEMPORARY STOCKPILE DETAILaW5ENEP ERE°RN ,"PE 1. DRIDI D1 1—NIN.M 1'sP �1E Aar ”"�".�° RR�T AA°o �� RPE PPD P°� m LFE aE<a °" a 3EE"ate< � 3Na`�,°"D 111NAAPRopo"DREMOVAL rs IF FEET°" G ITARDAND au"°AT�°"TD RD,°°°P� °NeR�E TME C01 FOR CO�,M=INTFl,TTE NEN1 K'E°I":LL RE�"�°Eo�"TME ° �A T a�. eEAD— ERF�FICCESN TRAMAER ��DA FFMD",PEAE,ER D,ERDA°°,M"_�°E ANA Au,D1°E�, " °aREE°"L.TAPER AAA�T�°"AD DauReEe AT A RA,E EER=EE�RPE MID �PueA<FEEA � 9 Pao�o�"°DOERTRuTo eE, PR12�E�,E°°;AR M RI"°NUNRER z°,> eRAALLLLIN RE FEA'URFDETREREA DTT uN"�PAvESpLT°P °ReE lER ITAR THE REIRIE °R aIER APPRaER'1AI 11111L aR MERE °D, �Au��w,�.Fx s��E� EIT ��°F�9� wp "'�s%�E°F oF�oa�E�MALL o PwaE M�oE T :°T �E A�aT�=°�AE«°T.ITE o°E �M FALTER R� a"ai SUBSURFACE EXFILTRATION CHAMBERS DETAIL YARD INLET ean,PA"IS°e°� 2. lTU Rou"° seA� NTS °uE,E"RDS°ER ED°� E�tiD De EaAw Row To�AL°o�TE TreA"3�r�°"�"°TR swm�FFEREu€� ANN Rau"T �ETP� EIR ITE PaeTEA EPEEA aE"�� ._E M�rv°" RA"N°°" "ITR TE°,° a�E °N,aEPa"E ,REET. EgyD°RI LES.PaE�SRALL RE STEEL ITxERTTPE aR DAEA E°LEA 'z EDNTD���Ea°«P�`„(° e.1"FTIN"-60"1; 111EI SIRE I F LTE URELY TN EN 1EE NCE s�ALL eE REAS N'U SPP AN —CVALUEInLE(rTL�")�" ao�a c,ERucc Ac ''�Z'E111i TWO LT'R AC - INKA"IN PER ,h,T..a,T.,r�.,h,a,`a% TE UN I n, „ N°uEFFT ADAE ao”�D E�LTD „°E D"°P°""NA�R'AE REM°�° ROOFTOP DISCONNECTION - ASPHALT PAVEMENT TERMINATION SILT FENCEIALL ANDAND SPLASH BLOCK �NE � � Aa�P LINE nom,—,REE �'�" ,�„E u„ (SPLICE) UReMiwaEL TIIAI.aE LEEA ADTe Ec�. ”s SCALE ITS STATE LIS NA,81113 ETA"En 6R NN NLETeANerA°AA°" MAN D"°EENA"° was Tae Hove < l5'oEty.TLOPLAnEE"woEl FlE� sPEDE�A°o"E °N° — GAN Fl�a�°_;AD A aR�aRT TEAM APPE�A°"= aE,°RE "A.PD uD o Ass AETA E RI,e °�"� — EDN };aEs°mm, �1DTTD.,ALL°E°�P<APP11IITE" T=TA .s ° DE TRANT MATERA`w� w 1 AR ElU1 A� °"°SA"° NE wIT NRua °�RET T pm, ELEPA,°" w E. nRESATE= ° ITE uIE°E wAE"EIM°E~"°ITE°D�R EA°A1 E°R GA�E� �PP°RT RNMUM r 3aq.T=goE"oaR THAN ERKFAKDFABRC �AED°E eET°REL.EAeTD"E°T°TME'TAADe."° °TRII RENAN uNTD END AE ADD DDD PR°R T°A". Ra�"ARDA. TANFRFTDNNT, suecRARE Tu°°RADD .�, ITE R,t E°°°AER maw eTAR�uT..MAx�Mu"ARAB".AE AREA PERa�eDAl DID °RT^ND RDD°MMDNDAT�DNE PRFPARDA R.FD",RAE TRFD 21 BERKLEY LANE �° N°' FLAGSTONE WALK A RE EAR E STONE CURB °p TAO lF Fx°DDD (UNILOCK PAVERS) INLET PROTECTION TREE/VEGETATION PROTECTION BARRIER SEQION 13535,BLOO Na 1,lDT Na 6T VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK srsu= rvTs sine�s 11NTs SCALE LE. ITS WESTGHES COUNIY EW YORK Drawing TiUa CONSTRUCTION DETAILS Dale �"N8,381= CS501 WA �e nu�iai iEEa TOALTER=ST+Dmission Date M S ,t Tues TTiangancom Taos TwPTaawTTi°oouToi Tcaaa o w-�in°°zaa°i TsneeiniexTtne Pian t��misston�soorzaa°i—essm—moTmn o _D/s/rzms T 2 J 1 1 5 61 7 18 2 J I IFiled Map Lot 20 I I -- F.M.#13464 I I APPROXIMATE E%1511NG �� I TREE COVER �L`,'�y TO REMAIN(TTP.) e I I - I I I I I I 1 135.43-i-6 41 EY—11+ _ mad vapo... r- Now or Formerly ,,KL ° T&X LOT Mitchell Jay Greenspan&Caryn Cherlin fi 62 PXa % 3B ASR a JD o D B C` I. MAP!-OT 17 I 1 Filed Map Lot 18 / RED e,e F.M X13464 � 3 �4 n Are4=17,230.583 Sq.Ft. ° =0.396 Acres E, EXISRNG VEGETARON 0 I � TO RE-N(TYP.) '1.i.� �IcPJ ' _ I O >i ,ea 2 TAB = I I I I N- I 2 PAM ,2 NRW O 21' /_----�_ 2STORY 1 Y !-s*Fl+Y1F c I °I 1 2 PXOL I ` w 2 Iv M LAWN(TYP.) I g ��� neuro I I I \ I I I Dale Deeapdon Np. I I I REVISIONS R=6s.ro L-6p.N ♦ \ I I I 13 NRW O 24'O.C. /✓_'' �1� -��/ e:te.��ora' = I I :. `�° 4i;4'�. LAWN ]BXGJ --------------------- E%ISTINO TO REMAIN ` \£GETA1I- 1 a "a D F SIONA HAE E CNED M1 < MIC REGISTERED LANPE ARCHITECT P J L NT Lc No.,0019011 s• — ---- ------------------------ LANGAN g� PLANT SCHEDULE r I p.pp.E I P.o,e=t 1 usr(sa s, I KEY QTY. BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME sm ROOT REMARKS ORNAMENTAL TREE(S) I I 21 BERKLEY LANE CVWK i CRATAECUS NRI015"MNTER KING" WINTER KING HAWTHORN 12-2 1/2'CAL BIB - 17�5..,,'....- T E EVERGREEN SHRUB(S)( � SECDON 1]535,aLO�No.t,LOT Nor s2 BXG 71 BERBERIS X GLADWYNENSIS'WM.PENN' FW—PENN BARBERRY 18-24' #3 CAN - —E—RVE BWOOX KL KALMIA LATIFOLIA MOUNTAIN LAUREL 30 B+B - pVFS�QlfS`ER COUNry EW YAK PXOL 8 PRUNUS LAUROCERASUS'OTTO LUYKEN' OTTO LUYKEN CHERRY LAUREL 24-30' 03 CAN TMB 2 TAXUS X MEDIA'BEANPOLE' NEEDLED EVERGREEN 4-fig B+13 — LANDSCAPE DECIDUOUS SHRUB 5 IV 2 ITEA MRGINICA'HENRYS GARNET' SWEETSPIRE 24-30' #5 CAN - PLAN I GROUND COVER IV MSF 138 MATTEUCCIA STRUTHIOPTERIS OSTRICH FERN 12 GAL. B+B spaced O 30' PERENNIAL(S) -j-N. Drawing No. NRW 25 NEPETA RACEMOSA'WALKER'S LOW CATMINT 2 GAL. CONTAINER spaced O 24'o.c. ,9aoi11o1 RFC 37 RUDBECKIA FULGIOA'GOLDSTURM' GOLDSTURM/BLACK-EYED SUSAN 1 GAL. CONTAINER sp°cetl O 18'o.c. DpteA]Ot] ORNAMENTAL GRASS ES Gppl• _ LP 101 PAH 12 PENNISETUM ALOPECUROIDES'HAMELN' IDWARF FOUNTAIN GRASS 2 GAL. CONTAINER - ,O Drawn By CM1ecked By F NOTE:IF ANY DISCREPANCIES OCCUR BETWEEN AMOUNTS SHOWN IN THE PLAN AND THE PLANT LIST,THE PLAN SHALL DICTATE. REFER TO SHEET LP 501 FOR LANDSCAPE NOTES AND DETAILS. Exr�ees.Touren xu SpOm\iasian Date M I snort B o, 9 i rN„oe.\Vma�.�*\vote\w\eeto.Vzooz•wi\ceRea o�a wpsooz.wi\sn.wr,n\sa.cio.s, .����wcewmNw°:-am.wa no/zou rmr 2 61 7 8 GENERAL LANDSCAPE PLANTING NOTES PLANTING SOIL SPECIFICATIONS aU. ,..7X `XZA=NME ET E E A.= fl='l�MM NEV —T J PL =_2 'A'"E, _N,_L,�r 11-IT =% Z 1�0. 047 U!% n"T ��OT��,I�Ua—I IL W%—`M. Al. r AN GROUNDCOVER PLANTING SHRUB PLANTI DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING D�r NG Z N NITS NTS n&. a.n.r D.�N.E EUo2L".8�ZH.�S Y P_ Trly�—%y,,My Z MWI"Z'ZIEW*M YE R, _RL"v Mr LAWN SEED MIX 11, PED,AA ` 8':M%.7 " R D,l'—A- 9 7 8��I R.— 1 IN. 'AtT 1� 1 lY LAD. E% HIA-Y P-T LAWN WATERING SCHEDULE o em rxs Pm.Kcr uxdwa T L11 X= &— p T A.& Description, N.. E RI REc ora VISION.S , =MIL 4� T r DEDAT =lD M I Q 1-1.YAN n¢—.1 1, M7ono Z —1D.1 SIGNED MICHAEL URA D By AT 1.—1 Y -- REGISTERED_ANDSC E ARCHINECT NY UI,N,901-1 LANGAN 21 BERKLEY LANE E SI—ON 13535,BLOIX No.1,—No. LUGEOE RTE BROOK WEVT RCOUNTY NEW YORK DTII, LANDSCAPE NOTES& DETAILS P,.).t N.. Drpxing N.. Dote spae LP501 wd.n By cneapea ByFYZ DB S—mT.D te Sh .1 u—. Sto.T _t.Inaoi ,«soon; a Iyco,•a oaN-.ft..uk aaquwt ofrhi•rovasrevhr a w;m on O.ik;aa!a/we caw swyroa,aneo:,w,�!uau be renwe�w m ae owt / r+.a�w�lno relwaoPM, �naarno,;am awwon w aw,aan m a naP a•.aaaa a l;.=,vm caw N�sroonoe �.� 'a.iaadan lsreaon nan,smaweionagmeNew rWk Iferrt S¢Eduaaan Law. rf1�r ewe � �� Paesessian oNy when iwi<ared w la��b�. � Cir �� r�e Yarcw rY l�i 'jebres W A4'a�emaiNaVee9'linv and mxrnenuroteun'cYe 64'c�varc la Mr c6 i I � it i i`�� eorlremtrafway.rmm�en¢w pu r m� not guamn fud ��au.C�p1y s.C�a� 6 S u�; �1 •I I T a.ee ,( � UnderS.oawdwi4tivahown hvean are oPP�a;^�are awshoald be a` �� I xY uu,N� 'g`lens{ofd? T '� ,^ renfvd Mfore otawrid w4nw arerwvM1own me 5. �Ifre� � ,e � _ � vI Aad-Lonatuwesaan �fa,w. wnarero r..nsw s,,,a� „�� 'f �� �wk+oa Ldr rl` ��� E�m,aawnenmana,mmlareaadaw pm e � ��«d' as• $� cib p2A.+Ir�H �\ `� I{ � .wwl m saa-rermw�e,wk,.e,.�a�,v,,a�ld..ia,�,eanddwuaw agvnew w•� ©7s�vl� 9"36 -- �,°W � I 4 ©,wr.mFE ,! a� � W� - nem�a hereon be�kEwna<,Lown aaarelamawP wwlea, Id �`�.so' �^-y {. ' Iia f 2 sa;dnaPtaeamaew cwrR ca..Nr clwr.oll D;.maa a/ °"refry a �T°a mgrs- 'I)"°°I^'W' I �� �I � Q wwxe�a amxela naz aaaa�aP„la�aee i3aea. �4 � �5'"`�`i.a° ,Fa ,d�° � ,`n.s �, Is. � 8 E Prenia�haan arra ae;nsdre;�alman ms rowa afMe uluase7 •b tr" p9' f c� s�.pl' CrMM 1 1M 6 { ryeHmd:Tu-a .'Sei:non 135.035,B1u'kla b2 If lleam` e I � 8 IDanim 88 %eosin Yin L�� � Elewawu rwwn hereon acewdaare wvANOMAn�oiran \ BERKLEY _ - ;,ISI �;` PmPe+bAadreu': � 105J3 'B \ rrr.o- P ; 1 sawwa .� rzY .�'dinw.vw alv�n� .Neon. Iu LANE rozGw a — 9I4'SzkOw eJooens=l'r �' . °�°e y vs 6 TOPOGRAPHYOFPROPERTY PREPARED FOR DOUGLAS TROIUE SITUATE IN TRE VILIAGEOERYBBROOK TOWN OF RYE WES9CAMSM COUNTY,NEW YORK SCALE.'P=20 GRAPHIC SCALE fame, pF NEy. Lunn_m rc coP.Mcw>•�:o„ ?� C. P.C. THOMAS CMERRITTS LAND SURVEYORS sa,wrm:asnla mlaml O nra�uaSC.ra[rswi'tSUNn 50Nvlvotu'.r•.C. 5 f9a Map 'A�.rt l3 394 BEDFORD ROAD•PLEASAN'1'VELB•N.Y.10570 n.wa�.amaoa..P,.«wa,.Fu�w. (914)769-8003•(203)622-8899 a>•oo /' Pmirer.Re%oanu Pula Sla✓eYB)' ]4110 BCIFf re n�SEOIkNp,SU�� Newt Iwryaa No.050600 lhawn By: CheckeaBy: ILI DM