Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2015-02-12 - Planning Board Meeting Documents Coming Soon. - T � i aiEEEVErvr na nT y s T woEEVEVT T TIT F I" L.E-EL"' IF E FST T i ue F uEwTo.sv aaTE T i �\ a wowo a of u n u u rti i cEEac mEnT aEu�wEasn,+o wwz ° xE r v ry sTN�rona cn NEE,AL oma= Til ie �a.� w T o cooE�Eav r -- -- -- Ea\ �T g a;wasa=' 61 T 11 EF �� � � E ®� �� ®� — ;' d _11-1111 �r anoE a VO 9"EFlFEo .F ETI ¢a 1ULTILEN EE o Fa �E. x_s-„ ma 12—11- -NEa ��T E E°°aaE� � FRONT ELEVATION 1/4'=1-0" a a 1 -- E FELT maT 1 w� o O z z> FII—EaT rR�°aEEE E azo> z iomz0 FELT .a,��EST,� hFIN t-L- ILL L- LT4. 111 EE ® ® aE I& P ECNEwniEFTEl Y ,Ea E. = 11 ITT �E - — Ft5i.9 IB�N�ASE I i Y � � mFanxiuwTr Eawnr avaaoxIlF TE F-11 NORTH SIDE ELEVATION A-2 a = xo,avcoPcanassEaEcrEo o-,o ao.,E,Exr r°wxEa Q 3 r T � �a aova naw.Emoa,a 3o.w nam recrEr.� y s asrw.E�ns�s ox w nsaR,aaHvs�s on,au '] — rE� EES. Y .no sP x w�x�ws wow= °A -- -- - -- -Is IE.INT 1-1 1 1111 TI 11 NVEM —ExTso R aa�1° Ex...Ea TET eonR°A n<raim nonan eu�ruREoIwo �l ElIT III�l�IAIE SronEVEn�R 5< - H 61 4 aR n Te 1 111Ecr - aeo STONE E�------J er°..rvER 3-111 rwni� .,weui Ese cx sTUE wok REAR ELEVATION a - aa wa°E°E� 12 -IR—IFEITI— RxEIEs°x, "� E. I�r ° F , �x� nI=wxMN��.ExrENTlRras nNa Fl —ER 11-111r MniL-a / rver EH N.,LEv°V,x W� xauTEs O O Z Z azo'z h v - - �E- Y sE�.TEO R.°�,xER sE � -sE _ p W o u m pJoz� ,rx�._ox�REw��wx ,EE°rE°R,°���xEa a o E%'1.cweau vrn�E R _ —E E------------- aEtow°N-T I.TIN3 - SOUTH SIDE ELEVATION - A-3 ADDITIONS AND ALTERATIONS TO: a 3 WOOD RESIDENCE NCE S09°35'00"E ENCE 1 03.00' FEN Y 0.2'E 2.3'E p]'E POST ,IND RAIL FENCE §'N FENCE - -- ry. 25 LINCOLN AVENUE � ONLLINE - E/W + + RYE BROOK, NY. 10573 o a51o36sQ.1t. m 35%x+ O 508 0.5 466 QJ p,_ �x52.1 x LOT 107 5ti / 1 IT RrL x1 n V O 39E wowo 151.2 49.3 a�€oov « « , az. 4za 1.a 5< ^^� B E p' II � 0 Azle r 1 O 4� .1'/ 11 431 ISI O a ma SITE LOCATION ) �' wnLL Tn�6 a"� T IIA - ¢a I1 ��nueuvavE 0 llll- '1.o E t.o3�11oaP oo �I x423 4dT \ FENCE 41.8 'FISH b r I.�H',.E o.2's o.l.® �POND��4o.3 Tc 99e 1 ` ELDPE ANALYSIS LEGEND: GOBOL DESCAP110N I! 4T ar T,44 uae O -- II v LOCATION MAP °aF '� 462 pe - N.T.S. N \1'p''l v 'u 1x'ke - ii$mnps 2V'14 7`� o, ,. - 40.E 3x4-N 11 r - aov ' NO.25 43 4210 41LL ITT 3 40.8 4D5 STEEP SLOPE DISTURBANCE CALCULATIONS 7111.. T "`g ACgTary'. 1.7151FT. m / - o 1 I4 L. .AY 8 c 'E NII1 '.L Q . 41.1 .coot TCinL gaTUABeryC, 445,JJ SQR CJI / 37.6 0 (JI o °° - e.�� « o m 3871 1 Ilo ."i a 1 j T m i n I - / O O W w F zy FENCE O O V z 405 4D 388 ?;3�ajUNE WALL xQ g W j Z P; 0. STONE x WALL x ,nzgaYM 40.3 N/ALL PAGE GENERALLY ALONG LINE 3.5 3g.gygLL FACE GENERALLY ALONG LINE p w 0 CONC. WALK CONC. WALK F a u RETAINING WALL DETAIL 3/4"=P_0�� ¢II N09°35'50"W 3a 1 03.00' �w 5 z m J o 37.5 30.4 4o1 CONC. 39.2 RB 31 LDROP CURB CONC. CURB 39 5 38 7 -- -- __ -- ------ -- -- -- -- -- LINCOLN AVENUEE. = -owewnc -- -- -- -- -- -- - -- -- -- 0 STEEP SLOPE ANALYSIS PLAN 1"=10'-0 ELI 411 RN.III— IILL _ " __ __ __ 4o a .\ll mfannnaml fortlL,plan was LR. . °� cr p,A,dcdvcy.n atld etccp ..1111Lc4T sl�pe'mnp 11yG b-F Senor,P_(:,l and 4uYveynrs datedCombev 21,11111_ Acvnrw:�-is limned lu the duln p',"',Iheeuv.Arcltileq is vul respuvahle fur the CUT AND FILL DIAGRAMnkntaeyufuxIsungrA,nasT�°ne. P-1 2 1�8"-V-0" s V ZONING DATA TM HIM DEIGNATION: SECTION. BLOCK. LOT: FENCE 1`?% ZONNIGDISTRET R-1000v SCRIPT OVERLAY g9TPJCT 25L14COLN AVENLE Fo;EE S09°35'50"E Fz"EE103.00' aLL REQ MAXIMUM VARIANCE O.7'S POST ANO RAIL FENCE - ,gN N c EXISTING PROPOSE] -—-- -- -- -- -- --— ¢ _ NII'loloOIJIENT6 REQUESTED FENCE " __ __ __ 1.0'S I:C HIMLIM-OT SIZE SOFT SD.F.T. 15p50 SQ FT. NO CHANGE CN LINE 6 6 I:,IINIMW STREET FRONTAGE FT 60 FT. 103.00 FT. NO CHANGE EDW 5 54 52 - IMINIMLMFRONTYARD FT 30 FT. - 3400 FT. NO CHANGEZL OD- rn _y NIMLM1I FRONT YARD(SCENIC OVERLAY DISTMCII FT 34 FT.(EX SHIN 3400 FT. 04.00 FT. - o SO fP - 50x- 1,11 I:tlINIMLM1I FRONT YARD NEGETATIbE BUFFER( FT --­Cl T. 3400 FT. 31.00 FT. I.00FT. O N "'12 ° sT 00 A sz2 x LOT�07 TIP r, IMI NIMLM1I FOR EACH NIDE YARD FT 10 FT. 15 60 Fi. 100FT. L Q hL SOFT[Al NIMLM 2 NIDE YARDS FT 25 FT. 47.40 FT. 418,0 FT. ____ O I:dINIMLM1I REAR YARD FT, 30 FT. 73 d0 FT. NO CHANGE - r 50.2 , �I 5 wo�LL , 3,P64250.FT. 2,202,249Q,FT. 2,9774710 FT. 51,2 "wo"o IMATIU1,d GROSS FLOOR ARBAg— r 49.3 % 212A 1TY, 192% - 48 ST, 20 Si. 1.5s.. EST. MA ISUbl HEISFT FT, 30 FT. 13 FT. 17,5 FT. - 46 46 44 ISI, 3p oe�x��w FRONT 80 59 76 - 1 :Gma �a'a IMApMUMHq GFT RATIO SIDE NORTH 14 b9 81 - 440 -7 aZ6 41,8 SIDE(SOUTHi 24 99 229 - , Z�, 43:o IMI NIMLM1I USEABLE OPEN SPACE ON LOT PER UI IIT SOFT, 1200 SQ FT 3,O8O BOR. 12,964 SO.F-. _ O u^ 41 IS II 0 a ma PG 47A BM LDI N G COVERAGE % 29% 10.6"0 11,2Y, - �0K 3 ryNO� mow'l-y ¢a ACCESSORI'BLILDIIVGCOVERAGE % -00 % NO CHANGE - OTD+ d4a3—1 IF IIIL z ovuvlrv., 'Im ¢�-No DECKS DDVEFAGE % 3.6°b C% NO CHANGE - 1x423 _ qp' 03 I:,IANMUkIMPERVIOUS SURFACE(IOTALI SOFT 5,416 74SaFT 2455QFT. 2,&3.91 SQ.FT. _ FENCE 4t� - JS d /V! 'Z 1 9E I I:JAMSTRU FRONT YARD IMPERIOUS SURFACE % 46% 12124°016 9% _ 0.2'9 D.i.® E-L 7sroa� 41.3 II \•yiSvtisb �L I i�' � \ I I US (:JAM UTP(GROSS FLOOR AREA=4an SOFT. PLOT ARE'21780 SO.FT.)x1'47842'1 EXISTING GROSS FLOOR AREA=IFIR TFLOOR '1RAIE SECOND FLOOR] NSI =4,OD SOFT -16L50-21,780 SOFT;x.114734211 -('724 SQFT.399A SQFT.159627 SQFT) a =4 CO0SOFT.1 F6,330x.IW8421 =2,20224 SIFT. ! aoDinary 00 BQ.FT 1.-72fi.56 PROPOSEDGRO$$FLOORAREA=1FIRST FLOOR-GARAGE SECOND FLOOR( 1406 XS m SII =3,2T342SO,FT IMI =(127242 SQ FT.45230 SO.FT.11,246.75) i IAAAI,JDI H9 GFT RAID FROINT=iFRONT YARD x.801 =257347 43.s NO FT.x.801 aZ.o a0.b x =24 FT. EXISTING 3UILDIMG COVERAGE=(BU ILDING COVERAGE SO FT.I LOT ARE AI NICE SIDE YARD,240] =(1,825 SO FTJ 15,450 SO FT.; PICKET FENCE m =24FT x2461 = �� ---_ _ u�R.c INI Eo 105 ml v ry YPEM1 =24 . =46"fi 11 ca 41.1 aE_0 z vN NIDE2=IS'DE YARD z240) ((PERVIOUS BJTFACE CALCULATIONS: �15 FT.24' ____ - __k_ 26 Fr EXISTING UI F ooei S_rLooR a �� o US � IUIPEIS OUS SURFACE.'2,001 SOFT=4 520 SOFT. BUILDING COVEP,AGEI EAST.DRIEAA'1 EKST.'VALK I EXEC.104D I„ ¢Ela,✓ O O o =NLDTNIZE 12,001 S2 FF.) 26] 1687 SQFT.1462,60 SQ FT.1216,40 SQ FT.-64 SO.FT. = 5,4W Sc.FT,12ODISQF-.1x.26] 24585"1 FT 111m 28— =3,449S0 Fi x,261 PR0 OPOSE] =89,74S OFT BUILDINGCOVERAGEI EXST.DRIVEhA"1EA8T.'IJALKIADD.GAAAGEIADDDRSElYAY1RET.SALL =89874 SQ.FT.145205QFT. 1 CD.REAR WALK I ADD.PATIO y C =5,41674 SQ FT 1,687 SOFT.1462.60 SQ.FT.121640SQ.FT.-115.17 SQ.FT.1166.60 SO.FT.162 SOFT 161.50 MET 7464 SQFT. Z ✓ O C n II:tlPE3VIOUR SURFACE IFRONTYARP.4D%OF FRONT YARD O A 4 =(FRONT YARDI..45 2,845.7 SOFT FE� '� FENCE p O V z> 40.5 4 38.BK 3S�S O9 STONE x WALL NONE WALL =X3,70-GQ.FTJx.45 CHANGE IN IIJIPERVIOUE SURF4CE'. Q d1 W> =1,666.8SQFT PROPOSED COVERAGE-EXISTING COVERAGE 40.3 V✓ALL R3AGE(3111 L11-11 LINE 3.5 N OQY'" 3M.bNALL FACE CENERHLLY ALONG LINE Z O N Z n 26459'SD.Fr.-2p50.Ws0.Fr. o w o as5:a1 sQ.Fr. CONT. WALK CONT. WALK F a W U o ALLMEDHBGHTrSETBACICRATOCALCUTA11ON. 38 o U =REQUIRED SETBACKx REQUIRED RATIO N09°35'50"W 103.00' a 0 z FRONT:30 F11.60=24 FT. 375 36,a Q ,D SOJTH NICE 10 Fi.r 240=66 FT. SITE PLAN LESENS, io.1 CONT. 39.z R8 3JoDROP CURB CONT. CURB NORT151oB 15 FT.h24C=24 FT. SYMBOL DESCRIPTION 39,6 387 EXIST NG H0GHTlSETBACK RAT CALCULATION: LL"II P uTrii r =Eq SONGHBGHTI EXISTISCSETBACI< ---- ¢SETT+IILN i E as S FRONT:18.83 FT 132 FT=.;9 -_y-- o>re e rwis„E S OJTH 9 DE 16.1 FT 115.8 FT=.Ofr A T.arsT E,FSET rE:r, NORTi SIDE 1$63FTl31.75FT.=59 "i_Tr�LNE.ETSrEPa.TesOF PROPOSED HEIGHU SETBACK RA110 CALCU ATON: -cai,Ennr,nuTrx EaPnNa SITE ILAN (_]�_Q =PROPOSED HHGHT'PROPOSEDSETBACK 1 FRONT:25,OFT l G96 FT, 76 _EA-INIF -AL1 . n.pl 1 C. pr tl t d ireP 90JTH NIDE 222FTl1.0 FT, 128 a .P ,lop R17�'h IPS PC.T'Q9 A' U0 b T 0'I i slrr No, "OR IT SIDR 24,6 FT,!U75FF=81 o c D h 1 m b P,.,d,N th A�na4"L, c-p—ibtn ro�mo .aoP".E,T _ S (l C C J _ iaP vEwE Zn$F£R REE_ ER OF 7,E OE ErtE, 0.2 EE S09°3b'60"E FENCE 1 03 00' FEND EE Q+ - FEN -EocT NIT E 4•rSTE aLOI THE LONER 0��5 POST ND RAIL FENCE ,g'N N o G oNara INE Ano EognlDwa.LE FENCE _ __ -5,- l-.N SEc1l _ __ ttuu,, __ EAST FlLTEz Faawc SEGTOn A CH INET gILETIOOAr-o-TIGN 1.0E aR� DILE V 54 V xEw En 5�,�1���3 of ELo A ON LIN V 56 ¢ G f- -T'-O'w' A DTLII"' "1_Es'NEEII .E o N11 INE IIINI INTI III Em � 511 54 52 ti r w_ �eacuFlu T H ry NTE z nwPLE Te ou< x - _ 1 11 111 LANE"' L co 0 O Og ."MPaLE 50.8 --50.5 8.6 toves y _ seal secnon e sREcvnRE>n mreTeEn aceET cH h c cansrwcTan � A 2 D 52 x LOT 107 on e. Lom SEaans as—1 aeovE. N a I a � s R �,� O ,ti unPEE �_ ° I Ta m SOIL �aaP TREE PROTEc„on ERVED � \, � "` �7 p rn III50.2 �E is Ou< G Toe-In IaeTHOD TN JOINING SFCTION5 OF FENCING _ _- TREE PROTECTION DETAIL _- � �..TE,� TIE,��ETmin_n. .IDS 4 N.T.S. sl z - a9a --- 4-n SILT FENCE DETAIL N.T.S. n° 2 m M1 40 aE r cnncLEnn� N asILIIII-1 111114 lINIITIl 111L .&opww z l-LEv_oTI-N � 44.0 DIE LE Pa reTTRE oD� El TM NOR: �GLPEORLEEE �TTD LSD TDnTEwEDE.nLTN� HI ETIIIEI,�� aN zT 6 6 '� 0 ¢ a 2 a O uli _ c TI N, O 5 0 III'Ell rsamaeE Evmzm M, vnu_ IIS a� H 11 HIE III ' < aam BLZED WnH ,Ell o.sT�w.T.0 VnEDMT nT_ x42. sb `419, 9 c II 111 co h 0.Hs.1LL.1T. _ a IT.Fl1EIe 4 Van.. `y IN, 1 EENEENG OR 6 AW N J NCE SLOPE EEICE E9 OR SLi IIIA,.,, FEN..2'S E D.1. 41.6 G pxpx POND'T 42.3/ 1.3 R�iTV �i S� T i A%ISI TT 6�3 SOIL STOCI4PILIIVG DETAILN.T.S. _� ,cEs�ATII 11 IN EPE s� 3 S.1O ---7 mII l a s �4N, NOTES: fe ceoaR--- xs ro I� noortl..n OR 1,e{]Rei.atE 1 L LL ce°nre nuu». 40.6 ENE Fuvi WITH_ES11 11 IIE IINT KEs 3AucER a°esE4 Y EE.EVIE RNE J Fi TIEHTLx am�TTlns THE nOLncErvT BPLESWT' S Nn 12 ELrTL>711E 70o EnL"N"vE v 0 92D 40 B o E �Tl empmT,s nae igRlz yL c sO BeLL in PICKET FENCE III me IF IAI FLo — Q. cgrnFezas rRee a'.IIIA I111 Il IN 1-1 TREE PLANTING DETAIL N.T.S. "P`E IF P_ALl�IF DxreE,AY MACP°P61 IIs1I O Tam e4a DRw-El E uRVALm o L'^y"ie T o a oo aoa 5' 3 ud N Poi°a rxE <Inram EvrEarvEre=ss or m I� conrwR Iry Ta e\\ /_-� .D oz Ireeoe Flow oz wmm�se NOT To eoe z \ D T !n s s Rzm AILE Im FLOff- AFNCHORWG hDETAILFO'T405 lTONE x L \ FENCT �VVALLTE 4a 38 AN 3 WALLEAOEGENEALE ONGUNF 3T, 38WALL CEGENERALLY ALONG L INTE 10 PLE CONIC. WALK O O V z ~w>� iomOl, EET N09°35'50"W 103.00' o w z o o EMBEDDING DETAIL 3].5 }6.a F a K O 4E 1 CONIC. 39�z ' RB 3T6DROP CURB CONC. CURB o wo o z m STRAWBALE SEDIMENT BARRIERS DETAIL ass sa.T a G o 6 N.T.S. LINCOLN AVENUE SITE PLAN LEGEND BAIBOL NESCRIPTIOIN -_- o HE fT-s Pre PEreE.-En-x IN CLIMATIC AND GEOGRAPHIC DEEICIJ CRITERIA PLANTING LEGEND HE TREE LOCATION/SOIL SEDEMENT PROT.PLAN 1••=10N11-1 , - ° ° `PE rnTEcoar TETHEIar TEIIT DEPar E.F aEDL REz 'E'w° xoc A11 fnruun fi lnxplu�w Lik FnnTn �wnp �dxdyN.�ywdrieap T- Luno I p pbyG.b IFS p.C.T dS d' d0 l I 014. Cas iin sEEaE a, m INIE III 5-HI IL01 aw amrxnTr T n1° A } f d h 1 D 1dihwun.:lEcM1it E tc,I-blc f,,rho 4 DE- 21 in .IPI/ - Mo_EwTE sL cxTro - -y"rnr,»„ ,d b„�s_ ��������� _ 1Tmr,P�r Le,n ADDITIONS AND ALTERATIONS TO: a 3 i WOOD RESIDENCE 25 LINCOLN AVENUE y �a RYE BROOK, NY. 10573 y GENERAL.NOTES AND SPECIFICATIONS: n General notes: Concrete: Wood Framing Continued: Exterior Finishes: 1. lh AEdf p 1 n—,.—bk f methods 1 hl LF 3010 - 'Nda 13.Do bl-d pl I W' d i.d b ed -g3 -1 Nd(3%") 1.r deT I "p Ip, d q'I '11 ,,eats. I d I ps ab. } woppo 2.C h 11 fy II t d o s nnc.fidd nd shall-.N the Architect \II xre exp„edro wea,her' 1, 1.A--fnu Td-wall;]IN eon n vnr,alsl,12 1-.2 from I,.p end b0¢om and -mll lcngd,of 2 1 d&h ' t f d a `o 4 g V P - --..Te9uite w€ c bee IIb d.p r,s,g. rcu¢ 'Id Tb g iC dbllu 14—,d, t. wof.fts 11 ,s-g 4 Al1 I $'w rc 4. All 1,- b d P UL dlppl''bl I 1 tl,'b cofd," 40f d p Roofing 5 np" 11—f—;for pmntingn d/ g d a' h 'N V 1 S 1,1-li C F P dF fey 4 ht l ,1 hill - d' 'NASTM 1k'mA AR2. f 1 �,,v\tk S ,E BY shall b,l pp d Jll b d vn s t splices end co n,:rs v,d 1- a' 1516 fit 1f1 - I-dl\ l u,tso t.ctrnd InCtxe[cri-oFinr'Finishes: inishers 2—d-- h Album (7s, Cs-IL-- C—,Clper 3,T,W 301.1(1 Ci-,7o4 ,m tal Jmncs llardiv h d ol-IvI,,o Jine c0lnr as scl„ctcdby own,x. j D� ,hall be Fo„I d dd-m' bey 1 r I Il dl 'lly'm 1 N d d' 12 yp.R' gh .L led olhe'w se.Lae 1/2 ne•,b1a.d 1.oncrete ah h 11 d60 ff i.1-AN, 40 ft.from corntt.No 3.Pro d �pP 'll y dll I-gvs'erlu.red. h'h ,ud1/ 1'd- 6. C till W 1 COmpevsatlon andl'bl Vo 6 s Al am0ltn,s der d,,0sm,rha Tnle,s in ca,c,P sevirL.ntmperson --Ild 1.wally xcpcnnibl,. 4-Ansae dnp 1,3(1,Yq,u,ed 2.V�p.boxer to ,, v.hvow.us,pp.vg wmpo Bended smooth epeunl orwplL wverv,u Inq 1 d 'II b db-fi I 5.RnohnGsl,all be 311 year asphah sl,nglcs to a,eh cxistng, WII -, p- d a[y hnislp- n.ens,v„p p o1 (, 1'llp f II h'q df pl fl p,ja-r, ,1Inubep mm,c ble odry u y he . y,lercunire e-a c',I 4 A '''Ib db' th t:.d tl th d Ih fPo d,.. 1 - Window and Exterior Doors m< E d - d h h 1-I I I I dl Pd P1 =d P P 1 Site Drainagf1.\vino d 'd, t 'll d',s per deudts and spell u n,du„ 6 D h d h p -f dby P d all t I d h 1. S dFlaccmcnt vhullbc wh dui 1,, '.d I 1 R h I1' fedb ,n i.wllr. w-i 9. C b11 11 S 1 d - ',h the u 2.AU -1'dl h' de pl - W d---fl eq- Cl hl-g h d L o� di ted S'pp dl :\h pr 11. _ "dam Pry d - k h h 1 d dl - 3.S1c p L p d d--1 M -ng mh. gc,c}cn,.,s 9 F hfl £ 1 db I O.i h h L d' h di "—•.New J.ewte ,I,Il bew ec,ed,--61 s s,s,mn C'n,esis„ 11 Rx la„rlhe WS Rildn Code. 111 Ce.u,,.tie ll. „len,lullea ,l/-'cmne,b.'d.tlnrla du,Baine ved,e d-1,11 ur. ft—, N 1r 1 d f lb d d L 'n9 P g Jre„ pvw,u e3 Insulation ° I h h ' 111 p l Nh A b d p ° Energy Code Certification Statement 11.$ ,ldl 1l ddu .g 1' ,,-d Masonry I.The l II T q- me,s tl,n'.:V,Ny U 1 f 6 II ff ad, cp p I Smnc and C, 4 Il 1 II F o d,c nxmn.ncndudpmeticc far A.hl U-1 f luziug JOY w a r 12.A11 n s,,A 1 h ill 'tle d p"I dapflyl-he seme,:v d,'nilur B.hlirtim,mKVWuc,. T h be,l oAnvkne wledge endbel,l here a,ew"nys d pcl�io,,. F P'ed-,con-orm'n,,:ew lh the wndaoussuuless th p 111 d t d b k D.I' II b�S d cl y A l N l—,NI m,d 13.L hilt 7, db 11 b1 f II b d , New 1o11,Sl,dA1 gyCaset h,OnCode,egwro,nenls for Cl--Gone l(Weswheeler Comljl. Y P p tr Nott 4p f t f 1 D gn iC FLo.,d B„mimg C.—A1as0ny Ig- ri I­—d bh EW d I\N.:. b4 )m4 \alI 1i 1� 14.Ay I dhryi g 1'lll h i 'J' "',—Ip 2 All haul pl d gb d p 1 d I] 1t 19 r,cirn K.A fb 2.Campl p ff t d substn.tc S-1 1 15.411 rf g d"b db ,b,.prepar,d t0rpmper M -haIIL P 4 .-) 1p'-p 1'd P' hd dt' 3.R„II ,Il.s,h,Jl race.e..a,d'„U,n b - uF 5 0 0 00 fi.S 1 d/f d 1 d 1 ball ne o „ved by d2 1p--T, Ar n d t pp 4 s ff1 ff � dt p. h �ti � l a edelm Plumbing � _ w 1].111 k h lib p if 4 1 1 "end g er jd Y -2 A Y 1-All 4L b g—1-hall be pertormul b\ t �IVI b R.C p d' Pp 1 rP1” N a - s o, -f,zv compos ds.s,b as rsil�a hl -dcshall 2.Pro=d,.all l6,d-d—,,1 t0rcom 1 ,0n of II I L-n,work nd wtrd b b d 19.G rel not,,.to b trtdl,adhered m I.,,ffi ,c n ion d,d gs I dd d,n p p 6 ll f I bl h F-1-1.u,d w hvo ww,es r11AI be Glled,slid-J, nn pl Foundationp 3.Plnmb E ucn,,hwl,e:b:dl Boal pl,Gn_elde eq,:e e ,p.,o,lan 'I.F hitt V {r Id 1 '1 T Il N I'llb pi d 1 d, f50 crfo- o ,LOPE ANALYSIS LEGEND 511 z 1i o�nlaarfl mn p� ,ate pin«meoc r;gh hall,C-0 m.,0,11[e„---d,` ,',h blw]s a,dD—O-wnt Electrical: 'hr,0,11 be di, svMpol heseelPrlow i.All f -g Ib b -.bl g-1 d- bd t. p r ed rcgnt ,d—„dl,n.Wall rein-a,:yen. —,111uons' ” — Ii s nalsnlrbeds ',mm be ing,a 1211 mny I.All el 'I -I.1'111 p r -by' -" 6 1 1111111 4. 11f g 111 L>az ryo p•T fr.All 11 shall b dq 1}b d -I u'rclyt ed md,csh„clur.No waAehall Allw 1 till r 'I d -d q h g-rsdiclian. d "iI IC T' errIs x 1,1 d -41 f. ting1g d. h d ibj Con ❑ bl f p f,ll p f F h.P d h pl 1 d 1 d d -, 9.S ee mels II ;e;111-1111—1 bemng.Ihe,.,s lin el,sh'41 h-111.11111111 A.FIC,(,­1 pl Il —1,"'1 d l gh Dere,y.f'I-e l il1e11 rielcl 7 C 1u I I—IA,1,f I'g.i',,t rouaa'a v'J.0 P1 I,d leveI 111,—g,--d - hnrin "H.Bcarmv - ocx 111-1—d 'I­,--d,v,d rcd g0f gponitsshnllb,gf,,tedsohdtrd,,,,,roses below h—] c Allttph 1—hAlb C Ih —A b\J1'- D "\1i O UITr..1„var p h.Ally d I -ad. 0"'1 b,I d d d- crud. �� — o . N.B I 11 I'pp d s1 h 1111 d 1'b” dI, { I f Wood Framing 7,Smpl D I'q'I' I .till d- I.L ep g p I.ids h f tl �l -d I IIIIIP1 t dl 1. P .hetlb 9.:'� I AIII 1+1 d fI.11 PSll umbzt'eaplsedm extmmi""l+e deepd LA hfl V- 1111 fll It ere IC ere f J1 1�4 9-Pr 1 nnaes 11 'lb Zp] -d f do on NT—11 p1'—is 12 or V - - d Yml S N.rP\.17 d 11 Ohs, bl d d q. 'g I „W .,�w t p I ix meds ,,—d mono, rent,. , sh,ald l .U. f Ilf .—b—I.b„r 1/2' ].AI ,n ` - 3.,III ft b d,I b1 1 d 4p NVRC 1604.IS AI p' .till be b j tiZw2 4 All 1 c f d b:dg g d p' b 0 P' g. .-IdId -,—1 f d,,,11 p . P L ff a all and f er y i 0 Q Y bed k, i 11 p 4h0. k Indt'aallcmnars- —1 g l ,d - -d kel Th 11 ., ,eyu etin tin .o i O d bl1 N z 0 f \' Il raf sand attics as req d d l 1 ,neWad 0.h dn.e4. e,4 Ivo 25 I'all p Q K O O o 7 1 1, Il d fl 1 fi g.] 1 6.Carbo 1 dell b-nsmlL d q d b ltea,deuaxl Code of New w p u ,6 „3 hllF II d'.p f e.dguidel neo spihcu,llp-,r —1,S S I-1 S 14.2 dl I d d d —b- 4 b ❑ti0?i / f I d t 1 dl AI,1 Illbp dad hrll 1 Sty Q�OJ� h Alll Yadc b-1 X12- I h d A p NYSRC 16M. C I 11 ,d,AI 1-, g5prcxs •• I6 Q�+ 9 All 116 1 d. Sh 111 p -d d ,—d t d II p E (17 t ,rsim ~ li o 104 -1 I bl fl 1- I ➢ Ill ,all d-'f h 0.t b,Mo orere All—,AA-t 41 II\ Idll is d,Ngm...M I.NbI,101 b 11 d p f bras demi 1, b ,—d 1u d i.,dl-d,-iTE LOCATION In — n.rtY,,,m, -F moi, nahmber yhnllln Nurd,.pT,durfs L.\vithin eh dwclLn t on,nchs ory con'. slv,.pin�arcx 1�-Comectione_ 2 \whin l_f ,ferny sleep nre than ;,b0,\9onnxidt - p _ Al N'a11 A,sembN mann shallbepllvidndwl Yh,uslne,ng are„ -TOppl—,—pplarcconnccnon 216dmmmons pa tot m�7' ore dins,15f an}Soma Cvrtron lllonoYide A"I"7 -'Pop VI e , ,n,ev ion 4 16dcon nl,e—E,dej 1 iI 3.(1,I,, t duelling-it d,atc0nta nnsG i.,!\lonoxvrL.son,co. 'ND9356d v! 10i3OpLu -Stud mst1d eonnccuHon 2-15d ummlans 24' HVAC System: -xeaded led I6 ao�, LINCOLN AVENUE -Choose,pa la on.phe lsudw'nLL. ISdw ,+ins per_s4slud I.Naw Heni,ga,dCo11-,gsyslem ahnllbe p,'o1-axd desgneQ odrru anla'in 58° nrrr0q B1"FIA,, bl3 ll bl1 sCG11I 11111& p hod a p- STEEP SLOPE ANALYSIS PLAN S hdB d FI J NdC a h ,d 2.can I II 1 I I p -,L.y p dp- m 1 20 0 B.... ,1r FI. 1' ( I'll n n -F 111 pas11,.1111 I 101.1 LOCATION MAP tl dl t Jl �l- C ti 3-16d Cmmnon,per Joist a.Al FEW., BA C a y ... d',p4 hill UJ.tilled 11 `m f I-pl alU. p d dd gt, L 1 T_ 1 N.T.S. CS rPCL d5 - d d0 12 014 d I, (.)door As bl} NV.II:\ b1y w,A r>d d hen d } Mep above we;tnkm,I— lSmaps 21114 FI0or1 sr,.Top Pl'.',,C neetlon 4hd Co, —pa Jmsr 4-Both .shall be-1 s i ourdws' ,rd—,-1ht s'dendal nide of tlWxprov tlM,herc",.Arch ee e,pansibk, he accu,u'�1 ex,fng -Rlolhli g to Sill 11111,Ple,e 1,I1— S6'1d C---per fool New\'mh Cwr candiuonl. ------ ----------- �a ,.e 0 0 o y ,.T,a L u LL�wmaa=�a< I Y -�a Eo. ,pw� ) O = 00 00 �a a -s SECOND FLOOR CONSTRUCTION PLAN 114"=P 0" ®'i - r-moi P CONSTRUCTION LEGEND', - 3 SYMBOL OESCRIP-ION o s.r�u.uoae.ry W ® a.. h - o�iz x—I.T s.um A Ia m w>z 'o N o ® eo.axso — O 4 o� oz- �c 31 - .,oT nss s, _ a 1 T � � — �w — CONSTRUCTION F RST FLOOR PLAN A-1 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK 938 King Street ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Tuesday, February 3, 2015 Meeting at 8:00 p.m. Agenda I. r 14-022 George Wood&Melissa Wood 25 Lincoln Avenue Construct 2nd side addition,2nd story addition&driveway expansion. Mail Affidavit--V/—Sign Affidavit V/ Approvals(A/N) 5 –O Adjournment Z # 14-023 8 Edgewood Drive LLC Mr.Frank Chiarello 8 Edgewood Drive Construct new single family modular dwelling. Mail Afdavit Sign Affidavit Approvals(A/N) Adjournment 3. Approval of November 4,2014 Zoning Board Summary Approvals(A/N) Adjournment DM ✓ MI ✓ SB ✓ SF AK PP JR K&B JS ✓ DH ' • 4V � t4 JJ t+24 Vu�j a4r. J VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK MAYOR 938 King Street, Rye Brook, N.Y. 10673 ADMINISTRATOR Paul S. Rosenberg (914)939-0668 Fax(914)939-5801 Christopher J.Bradbury www.rvebrook.org TRUSTEES BUILDING&FIRE Susan R. Epstein INSPECTOR David M. Heiser Michael J. Izzo Jason A. Klein Jeffrey B.Rednick NOTICE OF HEARING ON APPLICATION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the undersigned has filed an application to appear before the Zoning BoaadufA eats of the Village--ofRyeFBrook. Application #14-022 Applicant: George Wood& Melissa Wood 25 Lincoln Avenue Rye Brook,New York 10573 Applicant Proposes to: Construct 2nd side addition,21d story addition& driveway expansion. At the premises known as 25 Lincoln Avenue in the Village of Rye Brook,New York, situated on the east side of Lincoln Avenue, approximately 1,200 feet from the intersection of Westchester Avenue and Lincoln Avenue, designated and shown on the most current tax map as Parcel ID# 135.65-1-46, the applicant does hereby request a variance(s) from the following applicable section(s) of the Zoning Ordinance: §250-7.f(6)(C) The minimum required vegetative buffer in the scenic road overlay district is 35'. The applicants proposed 2°d story addition will align with the existing structure setback of 341. Therefore a one foot vegetative buffer setback variance is requested for the 2°d story addition. A Public Hearing on said application will be held before the Village Zoning Board of Appeals on Tuesday, February 3, 2015, at 8 o'clock p.m. at the Village of Rye Brook Offices located at 938 King Street, Rye Brook, New York 10573. Plans associated with the proposed application are on file at the Building Department and may be reviewed by the public prior to the Public Hearing. Dated: ao Christopher J. BradbulTViflage Clerk P/0 173.37-1-1 P/ 1713 1-1 e 0 17 1-tr P/ 7 8-1-2 . 3 61 dFFp RUN .1 3 O 33 i2 42 Pml {1 S x7 � 39 37 V 31 R0:1 kl.a t•1 7 ti vut 1•• U 6. Iml 3• >o O .R Pay R D Pia � .. 2 'PE•GNE o �9 1 ¢ 7 V �^ rn ci 44 LA i9 O O l�6uAa�11.1) 26 Z E4.1 i Cl 2C3 qu 1427o Pra I31 i.K. o }' .6 O St�A 01S1RKT :7 � O°°I / Pay 7 7 2m AE. 00 LANE � .e 1 / P°y O B7 RD�K OO 4l _ w ;2 • V � p2 i3 i o 11 RYE TOVN NILTON oq3 Y V o P� o :3 n IR E Z ^1 � ❑ :9 5 1 12 Q 711 � �t•1' P/0 CIS-73_1-20 .7 1-19 PM 1473 P/0 135.7 "M P/0 13574-1-R 135 57135.58 135.66 .N 135.73135.74 IMI VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS RESOLUTION WHEREAS, an application has been made to the Zoning Board of Appeals by Samuel F. Vieira, on behalf of George and Melissa Wood (the "Applicants"), for a one (1) foot vegetative buffer variance from Section 250-7.F(6)(c) of the Village Code in connection with the proposed construction of a two-story side addition, a second story addition and a driveway expansion at 25 Lincoln Avenue in the R-10 zoning district. Said premises being further identified as Section 135.65, Block 1, Lot 46 on the Town of Rye Tax Assessor's Map; and WHEREAS, said premises is located within the Scenic Roads Overlay District ("SROD"); and WHEREAS, Village Code §250-7.F(6)(c) requires a minimum thirty-five-foot wide vegetative buffer in the front yard of properties within the SROD; and WHEREAS, the Applicants propose a second-story addition with a proposed one (1) foot incursion into the vegetative buffer; and WHEREAS, a duly advertised public hearing was held on February 3, 2015, at which time all those wishing to be heard were given such opportunity; and WHEREAS, the public hearing was then closed on February 3, 2015; and WHEREAS, the proposed action is a Type II Action pursuant to the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act, and accordingly, no further environmental review is required; and WHEREAS, the Board, from the application, after viewing the premises and neighborhood concerned, and upon considering each of the factors set forth at Section 250-13(G)(2)(b)[2][a]-[e] of the Rye Brook Code, finds with respect to the one (1) foot vegetative buffer variance: 1) The variance [WIL WILL NO ] create an adverse impact to the character of the neighborhoo ; 2) The benefit the applicant seeks [CAN/CANNOT]' be achieved through another method, feasible for the applicant to pursue, that does not require the variance; 3) The variance [ISZJ NOT] substantial; 4) The variance [WILU-WILL NOT]) create any adverse impacts to the physical or environmental conditions of the neighborhood; and r 1 5) The need for the variance'[IS IS NOT] self-created. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that said application for a one (1) foot vegetative buffer variance is hereby [GRANTED/DENIED], subject to the following conditions: Dated: February 3, 2015 6z ��✓ '�lr,+� Don Moscato, Chairman Steven Berger Voting Ye Nay� Abstain Absent � Andrew Kaminsky Voting: ye Nay Abstain Absent Don Moscato Voting: �' e Nay Abstain Absent Jeffrey Richman Voting: Aye Nay Abstain Absent Joel Simon Voting: TAye Nay Abstain Absent __CAyes O Nays Abstain Absent -2- VILLAGrT - BROOK D BUILD E MENT 9 G ST DEC 31 2014 RYE BR ,NEW Y 10573 PHONE (914) 914) 939-5801 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK o . rg BUILDING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION TQ THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Application Fee: $350.00 (VI/paid • Escrow Fee: $1,000.00 6paid DATE: **********************************************************************--******** Subject Property: 2 L•1 GO[-0 A V� ' Parcel ID#: .�� �� L - UZone: —I Applicant: DGvA-)Fir' Address: Phone: Property Owner: L44WIE r- taJS'�kV4CCb Address: Phone:qa.5(c �9io9�1' 14oV j1. L_eA 57- �M V� ,L_ F_, I I F.-1 t2Ar Address: b Attorney/Agent: 15 c.ww Phone: 7(4 65F 1WQe� 1•A.,• 1 /0"., The applicant named herein does hereby('2 equest an appeal from the decision made by the Building Inspector on an application dated , 20 f whereby the Building Inspector did: ( ) Grant / ( Deny the applicant a permit for A., SemLo rj 0 1--L--a rL 1-1 o �J /49_">oVF_ Exl,�,Tl ►J 9 nia-°ir s= _ao2_ 1. Tyne of Appeal: WVariance to the Zoning Ordinance ( )Interpretation of the Zoning Ordinance ( ) Certification for Continuation of a Nonconforming Use ( ) Permit for Occupancy ( ) Permit for Use 2. This application relates to: ( )Use ( )Area ( )Height (4Setback ( )Other: In connection with: ( )A Proposed Building (AAn Existing Building 3. Previous Appeal(s): ( )Have (Have Not been made with respect to this particular decision of the Building Inspector, and( )Have ( )Have Not been made with respect to any other previous decision(s) made by the Building Inspector regarding the subject property. List All Previous Zonigg Ap,Eeals Either Granted or Denied Concerning the Subject Property a. A requested variance was( )Granted 1( )Denied on application# dated, for, b. A requested variance was ( )Granted 1( )Denied on application# dated, for, c. A requested variance was( )Granted 1( )Denied on application# dated, for, d. A requested variance was( )Granted!( )Denied on application# dated, for, -1- 4. Alteration: If work constitutes an alteration or extension to an existing building, describe briefly: eoAt5Td2✓L-o0Z IsXProNgio,J a'F �xL5i ii�C+� �j�4 �X1�2E/r✓! TEVL611' 1=1 C'c;rZ_ 5. Construction Cost: What is the estimated cost of the proposed work? $ 6. Reasons for Appeal: A. An Area Variance to the Zoning Ordinance is requested because strict application of the ordinance would create the following hardship: 'r% E-EX1 STir3[„ 140v9E 1Fa0'WPTW #Aei A �� F� 1=rZor�i ��v� SGT��.c� . 'T�-lC �Ry►R�Pr.� ��G ��� L �Zoa O✓GP�>�-1 fr AE;� FToeX GvT';, /Zler� 1 Y-4G :z y�'�r-ja Fc olw2 W I L-(-- A- !/AfZ.& �C 6� i�5ia 7a 1'gp' r-eg.�2. wu-L- Frbryoza -.4? V2 r-Ae-.,F' B. An Interpretation of the Zoning Ordinance is requested because: C. A Use Variance to the Zoning Ordinance is requested because strict application of the ordinance would create the following hardship: -2- 7. Requested Zonins Appeals: I. Section of Rye Brook Code: Zoning Requirement: �GFF 1L P*O OV941¢I I*Lyd i yi2n = -4 r--,> rr Proposed Work: 45C4PrO F(-oog- 4-r 3A• r--r FfLo" F20F x--10 F- Requested Variance: H • o a 'F- II. Section of Rye Brook Code: Zoning Requirement: '*3 C-�, 'F(• ✓F-C Tx,dVIz l3y�FJ=gL Proposed Work: 2r--Go wc> r-t-o-n— A. T 3 4 ELO" Requested Variance:_ I F--F, M. Section of Rye Brook Code: Zoning Requirement: Proposed Work: Requested Variance: IV. Section of Rye Brook Code: Zoning Requirement: Proposed Work: Requested Variance: V. Section of Rye Brook Code: Zoning Requirement: Proposed Work: Requested Variance: VI. Section of Rye Brook Code: Zoning Requirement: Proposed Work: Requested Variance: ***List any further proposed zoning appeals on a separate page*** -3- 8. Item checklist of information from instruction sheet: ( ) Letter of Disapproval Properly completed& Signed Original Zoning Variance Application (� Eight(8) Sets of Sealed Plans (� Non-refundable Application Fee of$350.00 (p4 Escrow Account Fee of$1,000.00 ( ) Provisions of any deeds, covenants,easements or restrictions affecting the kind of improvements allowed or prohibited upon the premises. ( Notarized Mailer& Sign Affidavits,Area Map &Public Notification List (Please note that the notarized affidavits must be received by the Building Department by no later than the Thursday prior to the scheduled zoning hearing) This application must include the notarized signature(s) of the applicant of record as well that of the legal owners) of the subject property in the spaces provided below. Any application not properly signed shall be deemed null and void and will be returned to the applicant STATE OF NEW YORK,COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER ) as: Z� ,being duly swom,deposes and states that he/she is the applicant above named, (print name of individual signing as the applicant) and further states that (s)he is the legal owner of the property to which this application pertains, or that (s)he is the for the legal owner and is duly authorized to make and file this application. (indicate architect,contractor,agent,attorney,etc.) That all statements contained herein are true to the best of his/her knowledge and belief, and that any work performed or use conducted at the above captioned property will be in conformance with the details as set forth and contained in this application and in any accompanying approved plans and specifications,as well as in accordance with the New York State Uniform Fire Prevention&Building Code,the Code of the Village of Rye Brook and all other applicable laws,ordinances and regulations. ,�.�- Sworn to before me this�� Sworn to before me this � day of , 20J�_ day of 201 of PU tary u 1' ature of Pr rty Owner ature of Applicant Print Name o Property Owner Print Name of Applicant JENOIFER POSTERJeNNIFER FOSTER Wafy Pwbli@:81@t@ of N@w lbrk Notary PIA119=811 to of Now lbrk N@:01 F06202860 No:91 FOOBIROOD Qualif5d in W@@toh@ittor County Qwalftd in W@@t@p@@t@f Gounty fA70171ff114gn UPif@@ MOO 20,2"017 My ceffi ii§@im Apir@@ Mily R8,201 Last Revision 9.22.09 -4- V FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. PLANNING,TRANSPORTATION, ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT RYE, NEW YORK FAIRFIELD,CONNECTICUT DAVID H. STOLMAN MEMORANDUM AICP,PP PRESIDENT To: Gary Zuckerman, Chairman, and the MICHAEL A. GALANTE gy EXECUTIVE PlanningBoard of the Village of Rye Brook VICE PRESIDENT 35o THEO.FREMDAVE. Date: February 6, 2015 RYE, NEW YORK 10580 914 967-6540 FAX: 914 967-6615 Subject: 25 Lincoln Avenue - CONNECTICUT Application for Approval of a Site Plan 203 255-3100 HUDSON VALLEY As requested, we reviewed revised plans submitted by property owners, 845 297-6056 George and Melissa Wood, for approval of a site plan to construct a LONG ISLAND second-story addition, a covered entry porch, and an expansion of the 516 364-4544 garage into the side yard of the existing home located at 25 Lincoln Avenue www.fpdark.cOm in the R-10 District and the Scenic Road Overlay District (SROD), Section email@fpciarlc.com 135.65, Block 1, Lot 46 as shown on the Town of Rye Tax Assessor's Map. Property Description The 15,450 square-foot property is currently developed with a one-story residence with an attached garage, a stone wall along the front property line, a drive way and curb cut, and a concrete patio in the rear yard. The property slopes down to the west approximately 13 feet from the high point along the east (rear) property line. There are mature trees and other landscape plantings throughout the property. Project Description The Applicant proposes to construct a second-story addition, a covered entry porch, and an expansion of the garage into the side yard, and expand the patio and erect a stone retaining wall in the rear yard. Review We reviewed application materials and revised plans submitted by the Applicant that include the following items: 1. Short Environmental Assessment Form 2. Exterior Building Permit Application FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. PLANNING,TRANSPORTATION, ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT RYE, NEW YORK FAIRFIELD,CONNECTICUT 3. Site Plan Application and Checklist 4. Topographic Survey, prepared by Gabriel E. Senor, P.C., Hartsdale, N.Y. dated October 21, 2014 5. Rye Brook Building and Fire Inspector's Zoning Analysis Memorandum to the Planning Board dated August 18, 2014 6. Architect's Plans, prepared by Samuel F. Vieira, Architect, P.C., Sleepy Hollow, N.Y.: Sheet Number Sheet Title Dated T-1 Title Sheet/Notes/Specifications 11/13/14 rev. 12/26/14 SP-1 Location Map/Steep Slopes Analysis 11/13/14 rev. 12/26/14 SP-2 Site Plan and Zoning Chart 11/13/14 rev. 12/26/14 SP-3 Tree Location Plan/Site Details 11/13/14 rev. 12/26/14 A-1 First and Second Floor Construction Plans 11/13/14 rev. 12/26/14 A-2 Front and North Side Elevations 11/13/14 rev. 12/26/14 A-3 Rear and South Side Elevations 11/13/14 rev. 12/26/14 Please note that our review is limited to planning, zoning and environmental issues. We offer the following additional comments regarding the revised plans: 1. Topographic Survey. A topographic survey was submitted at the December 11, 2014 Planning Board meeting. 2. Zoning. According to the Fire and Building Inspector's zoning analysis, the proposed site plan included four zoning non-conformities: a. The minimum required vegetated buffer in the Lincoln Avenue SROD is 35 feet, the proposed buffer is 34 feet; b. The minimum required front yard in the Lincoln Avenue SROD is 45 feet, the proposed front yard for the second-story addition is 34 feet; c. The minimum required front yard in the Lincoln Avenue SROD is 45 feet, the proposed front yard for the garage expansion is 40 feet; and d. The minimum required vegetated buffer in the Lincoln Avenue SROD is 35 feet; the proposed buffer at the parking court is 25 feet. Three of the non-conformities were resolved by modifications to the site plan. The fourth, regarding the 34-foot vegetated buffer, was resolved when the Applicant 2 FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC. PLANNING,TRANSPORTATION, ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT RYE, NEW YORK FAIRFIELD,CONNECTICUT appeared before the Zoning Board of Appeals on February 3, 2014 and was granted a one-foot variance. 3. Landscape Plan. We continue to recommend that the landscape plan for screening the expanded driveway should be reconsidered and improved beyond the minimal green fence approach of the current plan. The plantings should be naturalistically located to create a multi-layered tree and shrub planting that would enhance the existing buffer area landscape. 4. Steep Slopes and the Retaining Wall. The site plan for the rear yard, the proposed grading and the configuration of the retaining wall were revised to comply with the requirements of Section 250-6 B.(1)(g) of the Village Code regarding residential retaining walls. 5. Tree Preservation and Protection. The revised grading and excavation for the reconfigured retaining wall in the rear yard will not significantly affect the 24-inch diameter maple located adjacent to the north property line. 6. Exterior Lighting. Exterior building lighting fixtures should be energy—efficient, shielded fixtures that would eliminate sky lighting and reduce lateral glare. We look forward to discussion with the Planning Board. Marilyn Timpone-Mohamed, ASLA, AICP Senior Associate/Planning/Environment cc: Honorable Mayor and the Village Board of Trustees Christopher Bradbury, Village Administrator Michal Nowak, Superintendent of Public Works/Village Engineer Philip A. Butler, Esq., Village Attorney Samuel F. Vieira, R.A., for the Applicant 11DOCS215001Rve Rrook1538.660.25 Lincoln Avenue.Site Plan.memo2.mtm.doc 3 February 12, 2015 RESOLUTION APPROVAL OF A SITE PLAN APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT A TWO- STORY ADDITION, SECOND-STORY ADDITION AND A DRIVEWAY EXPANSION AT 25 LINCOLN AVENUE WHEREAS, Samuel F. Vieira, on behalf of George and Melissa Wood (the "Applicants"), has submitted an application for Site Plan approval to construct a two- story side addition, a second story addition and a driveway expansion at 25 Lincoln Avenue in the R-10 zoning district (the "Application"). Said premises being further identified as Section 135.65, Block 1, Lot 46 on the Town of Rye Tax Assessor's Map; and WHEREAS, said premises is located within the Scenic Roads Overlay District (SROD"); and WHEREAS, the Planning Board reviewed the following plans and application materials in connection with the proposed Application: 1. Short Environmental Assessment Form 2. Exterior Building Permit Application 3. Site Plan Application and Checklist 4. Survey, prepared by Gabriel E. Senor, P.C., Hartsdale, N.Y. dated May 27, 2014 5. Rye Brook Building and Fire Inspector's Zoning Analysis Memorandum to the Planning Board dated August 18, 2014 6. Architect's Plans, prepared by Samuel F. Vieira, Architect, P.C., Sleepy Hollow, N.Y.: Sheet Number Sheet Title Dated T-1 Title Sheet/Notes/Specifications 11/13/14 rev. 12/26/14 SP-1 Location Map/Steep Slopes Analysis 11/13/14 rev. 12/26/14 SP-2 Site Plan and Zoning Chart 11/13/14 rev. 12/26/14 SP-3 Tree Location Plan/Site Details 11/13/14 rev. 12/26/14 A-1 First and Second Floor Construction Plans 11/13/14 rev. 12/26/14 A-2 Front and North Side Elevations 11/13/14 rev. 12/26/14 A-3 Rear and South Side Elevations 11/13/14 rev. 12/26/14 and WHEREAS, the Planning Board referred the Application to the Village of Rye Brook Zoning Board of Appeals on December 11, 2014, for a determination on certain variances needed in connection with the improvements proposed in the Application; and WHEREAS, by resolution adopted February 3, 2015, the Zoning Board of Appeals granted all variances needed in connection with this Application, consisting of a single one-foot variance from the 35-foot vegetative buffer required pursuant to Section §250-7.F(6)(c) of the Village Code; and WHEREAS, on February 12, 2015, the Planning Board opened a public hearing on the subject Application, at which time all persons interested were given an opportunity to speak on behalf of or in opposition to said Application, and WHEREAS, on February 12, 2015, the Planning Board of the Village of Rye Brook, pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA), determined the proposed action to be a Type II Action requiring no additional review under SEQRA; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board then closed the public hearing on February 12, 2015; and WHEREAS, the Village Planning Consultant, Village staff and the Planning Board have reviewed the information and submitted comments regarding the Application; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board is fully familiar with the site and all aspects of this Application. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Village of Rye Brook Planning Board hereby approves the Application referenced herein, upon the following conditions: 1. ; and 2. ; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that no permits shall be issued until the Applicants have paid to the Village all applicable fees and professional review fees incurred in connection with review of this Application. -2- LOCAL LAW AMENDING CHAPTERS 217 and 250 OF THE VILLAGE CODE A LOCAL LAW to amend Chapters 217 and 250 of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook regarding Impervious Surfaces. BE IT ENACTED, by the Board of Trustees of the Village of Rye Brook, as follows: Section 1. Chapter 217, Section 7 of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook is hereby amended as follows: IMPERVIOUS SURFACES throughA14 buildings, as defined herein, and a4l areas on the ground or ele-,;�;ated abo-';�;e the ground that are eoffiprised of ffiaterials liffiited to > > masonry, wood, > and , > sports eottr�s, s"ffiffiiftg pools, > , sidewalks, -ramps, terraees, and . Any material, surface, improvement or structure through which water cannot infiltrate. PERVIOUS SURFACES Any material, surface, improvement or structure through which water is able to permeate and which is not situated atop an impervious material. Paving materials, such as gravel, pavers, asphalt and concrete, may be considered pervious surfaces if they are fabricated, installed and maintained in a manner that ensures adequate permeability and infiltration, as determined by the Village engineer or engineering consultant. Section 2. Chapter 250, Section 2, Subsection C of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook is hereby amended as follows: IMPERVIOUS SURFACES liffiited to aspha4t, eenefete, ffiase , wood, , , sidewalks, faffips, effaE . Any material, surface, improvement or structure through which water cannot infiltrate. PERVIOUS SURFACES Any material, surface; improvement or structure through which water is able to permeate and which is not situated atop an impervious material. Paving materials; such as gravel, pavers, asphalt and concrete, may be considered pervious surfaces if they are fabricated, installed and maintained in a manner that ensures adeduate permeability and infiltration, as determined by the Village engineer or engineering consultant. Section 3. Severability. If any clause, sentence, paragraph, section, article or part of this Local Law shall be adjudicated in any court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such judgment shall not affect, impair, or invalidate the remainder thereof, but shall be confined in its operation to the clause, sentence, paragraph, section, article or part thereof directly involved in the controversy in which such judgment shall have been rendered, and such invalidity shall not be deemed to affect the remaining portions thereof. Section 4. This local law shall take effect immediately upon filing with the Office of the Secretary of State. BOWRIDGE REALTY LLC 7 Spruce Hill Court• Pleasantville, NY• 10570 Tel: 914-263-9495• Fax:914-769-5242 February 6, 2015 Mr. Gary Zuckerberg, Chairman and Members Of the Planning Board Village of Rye Brook 938 King Street Rye Brook, NY 10573 RE: SITE PLAN SUBMISSION FOR 80 BOWMAN AVENUE LOTS # 141.27-1-26, # 141.27-1-31, # 141.27-1-32 Dear Mr. Zuckerberg, After meeting twice with Ms. Amy Schoen, Mr. Daniel Tartaglia and Mr. Robert Goodman, as well as the town Attorney Phil Butler, Village Planner, Marilyn Timpone, Michael Izzo and Mike Nowak together with our architect, Tony Federico, we have amended our plan to address comments, concerns and considerations discussed at these meetings. As we understand it, it is recommended that a new zone be assigned for this particular piece of property which would conform to the project that we have designed trying to keep the comprehensive plan in mind as much as is feasibly possible. We have provided a zoning chart with our recommendations for this parcel with regard to FAR, open space and parking requirements which I have attached. This project consists of a 22,565 sq. ft, 3 story building plus an underground (yet street level in the rear as conforming to the slope of the property) garage. It includes 2,400 sq. ft. of retail space fronting along Bowman Avenue and 16 apartments, accessed from a Barber Place corner entrance toward the rear of the building. We have eliminated one row of parking from the Bowman Avenue side of the building in an effort to compromise and keep with the concerns from the Comprehensive Plan. The current building is set back from the Bowman Avenue property line 52' and 11' from the Barber Place property line. It is 5' from the side yard adjoining the TD Bank property and 66' from the rear property line. The apartments include 8 one-bedroom units, approximately 900 to 1150 sq. ft., and 8 two-bedroom, two bath units approximately 1,030 to 1300 sq. ft. At this point in time, we have dedicated countless hours, brain cells and dollars to the design of this project and we are very pleased with the results and feel strongly that we have fine tuned it to the utmost possible. We are attaching the floor plans and site plan as well as some visual renderings for your consideration and look forward to presenting this plan at the next Planning Board meeting on February 12tH incerely, Virginia Madonna Frank C.Madonna Attachments cc: Planning Board Members Anthony Federico, Architect Michael Izzo, Bldg_ Dept. Michael Nowak, Engineering Dept. Z9NING DATA +iL/rnx o�reici ,rto wixavx um'. - awnimm uamrme 0 s S N TD BANK " FEDERICO � a �...ro,..... ASSOCIATES <11 BOIVRIDGE hr-�I RE:4LTY ��sm�rff N LLC S. O. H ASSOCIATES r� CLEANERS ISTING1� PROPERTY LNE _�o BANK CIN PRaPE�r SNE _ _ — -- �-� 7seJCE HILL Crnm' z � I'Lk'A:;1N I 1Ll.f.NLl:lii,7' v p uu uu 4U3, z 1 BOWMAN ID -0. 10PLAZA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 w I I 1 NTER n rsuen rL�e c Q a o o II I1ISIIUCL,\.Y_ 7 sr PROPOSED 3 STORY MIXED USE r 6 MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL/ it _ t RETAIL WITH PARKING BELOW S 5 6 AI SITE 15 14 13 12 11 10 PLAN 3 12 7 „E 2 13 1 14 1,313 SQ.FT.OPEN SPACE a 9 i 22 — EXIT P — — — — — ------------------------ ------- ------- + BARBER PLACE ONE WAY lul 1 S \\ OF 1 PROPOSED ZONING CHART FOR BOWMAN AVENUE/BARBER PLACE ZONING DATA PROPOSED ZONING DISTRICT. C1-A - NEIGHBORHOOD RETAIL / FAH DISTRICT ITEM: IMPOSED NEW C1—A ZONE: NEIGHBORHOOD MIXED USE PROVIDED IA. PERMITTED PRINCIPAL USES: ALL USES PERMITTED IN C1—P DISTRICT (C1—P ALL USES PERMITTED IN R DISTRICTS) MIXED USE MULTI FAMILY MIXED USE MULTI—FAMILY—RESIDENTIAL/RETAIL RESIDENTIAL/RETAIL FB. PERMITTED ACCESSORY USES N/A INONE Fc MAXIMUM FLOOR AREA RATIO 1.05 ID MINIMUM SIZE: (1)LOT AREA: 21,000 SF (gross floor area/lot area 1.026 (21,982 SQ.FT.LOT— 22,565sf BUILT) (2)HORIZONTAL CIRCLE: 90 FT (3)LOT FRONTAGE: 225 FT 21,982.06 SF E MINIMUM YARD DIMENSIONS: 91 FT (1)FRONT: 10 FT MINIMUM 11 FT ON BARBER PLACE, 52 FT. ON BOWMAN AVENUE (2)SIDE: SAME AS C1—P 4 FT MINIMUM 5.0 FT. PROVIDED (3)REAR: 30 FT. MINIMUM 68.7 FT. PROVIDED FF—MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF BUILDING: (1)STORIES: 3 STORIES PLUS BASEMENT/GARAGE 3 STORIES PLUS BASEMENT/GARAGE (2)IN FEET: 45 FT 34 FT.UP TO 42 FT.OVER GARAGE AREA. FG MINIMUM USABLE OPEN SPACE ON LOT: 150 SF FOR EACH DWELLING 100 X 16=2,400 SF PROVIDED BY EITHER OPEN 1,313 SQ. FT. PROVIDED IN GREEN SPACE, 1120 SQ.FT.PROVIDED IN OPEN TERRACES TERRACES OR GREEN SPACE OF 10 FT.MINIMUM WIDTH AND LENGTH. 2433 SQ.FT. OPEN SPACE PROVIDED --- 2400 SQ.FT.REQUIRED H MANDATORY LOADING SPACE: N/A N/A L MINIMUM FLOOR AREA OF DWELLINGS: N/A N/A d OTHER PROVISIONS AND REQUIREMENTS: (1)PARKING SPACE REQUIREMENTS multi—fam residential: 28.0 spaces required multi—faro residential: 28 spaces req'd: 28.0 spaces proud 2 bdrm unit: 2 spaces/unit x 8 units=16.0 spaces 1 bdrm unit: 1.5 space/unit x 8 units= 12.0 spaces retail: 1 space/250sf: 2,412sf retail: 10 spaces req'd: 10 spaces proud 10.0 spaces required 1 space/250sf: 2,412/250sf= 10 spaces a�e F- 70 SO,IT, ;10 s>� 1 eROM FEDEP�ICO D eeax,a �INc HaoM ASS OCI1 17 M ster Benraom vl..u,. HALLWAY ❑ 3wa 3oea � ❑ wok—in do et Ilnen „� .ix BOWRIDGE Drama A�ao D" ADA �i REALTY Bathroo KITCHEN abbe �ay,���a 00 LLC eamr rn ----- I 0o I L — ,9D:HE HILLCOI RI' F­ uuw ONE BEDROOM — e ILE i1DI\ IF N1 Iii- 891 S0.FT. U �¶IL I hwc Ktchen a WO BED14'3"z 11'6° BOWMAN TROOM �� � 4y TWD o 1245 S0 BATH FT PLAZA 0 MERGEN EXIT RETAIL Both aom ❑❑ 2412 SQ, FT, RMEER PL M E Itl E IillltOK,\.Y. BEDROOM V Kwrva nen muuoa un `m"'"" 140'x 11'2' --, TWO BEDROOM ONE BEDROOM eu'w'u�soaaGx lau tlr TWO BATH ADA ,& 9BB 50.IT 31 SW,IT IL Bathroom ❑ ❑❑ o FIRST FLOOR 0 o e PLAN IINT O O ——D-- o �� Bathr m e J0a KITCHEN O E4'9'%1M FOCI ,I Ir ❑ BEDROC p ''°° � 1 d -- 1 DW WALK—IN � uvwc eoom � aosET D ❑ I � I S�o�a moxe �xe 70 S0.Fi. 70 SO.EL 70 SO FT FIRST FLOOR PLAN ^ _COLE L 4-14Y' FIRST FLOOR 1"� 431]431 SQ.FTFT. OF 5 TerraceET. Terrace ce � 7a so. 70 sa.ET. 7D so.ET. ❑ 'Rm I4'3".12 1200 Bedroom Bedroo ❑ Mn=ter Bedraam '"�" "„ FEDERICO �'ving Raom ROOM 143"x 130" ASSOCIATES °' d ❑ W ❑ W� ❑ II rasa xea wok—n tleset �1LeIX � I J WALK—IN —___ ❑ o a"w_--CLOSET,JI nn Dining Area 0 .i.r. �wllk—ia pee] DINING AREA OSe, DREOSSIND AREA BOWRIDGE ADA 00 0 43 x�o --- RE,4LTY Bamr m - -K III ooLLC —� WD BEDRW ADA —�� kitchen TWD BATH da Bathr om j as dr hwa Igundry �__ L, \N rSJOE HU LOTmi:.r L —� rwo eeoeaoM 00 _ DW Y L TWO BATH 6° linen pantry 126]ST.1.FT. 00 kltahen �o EMEEq N� ONE BEDROOM 11 D x 12, O❑ ADA rJ L BOWMAN 1VMAN III 0 ° uEcxamar 66 S.FT. ❑ Bathmo ❑❑ BotM1raa ----- PLAZA 0 0 0 BREDEBPLCE BEDROOM0 0O 141 X HI ° -- o _ mai � marts G ,I ONE BEDROOM ❑ Batnrgam TWO 1166 SD FT. kitchen � L7 F ue WBEDROOM F agar Do--, BE BEDROOM II"0'x 129 ❑ I I III ASA 9" 9"SO.FTn L ❑w oar 44 SQ.FT. L BgttT ❑ e I L ❑❑ o °o o F----- n 2ND FLOOR jol OA PLAN vo ,o� az ER L Bathroom T---- Feei ❑ FDOI , I� DINING AREA I41,k—'" DRESSING AREA 0 IL 14'3"x B'd' S1QC.asbt89'X 12'4" 0 ° DW uIc BOOM " Lim,Raam BEDROOM n ❑ ❑ 143"x 13'0 VT BEDROOM n Ii Di BEDROOM70 SO.Fr_ aLa Fr- O O SECOND FLOOR PLAN SLALL 1/4"-1 1. 7 567END SO,F T A7 ND FL F OF 8 TerraceET. Terrace ce � Ta so. TO sa.ET. TD so.ET. ❑ 'Rm I4'3".12 1200 Bedroom Bedroo ❑ Mn=ter Bedraam '"�" "„ FEDERICO �'ving Raom ROOM 143"x 130" ASSOCIATES °' d ❑ W ❑ W� ❑ II rasa xea wok—n tleset �1LeIX � I J WALK—IN —___ ❑ o a"w_--CLOSET,JI nn Dining Area 0 .i.r. �wllk—ia pee] DINING AREA OSe, DREOSSIND AREA BOWRIDGE ADA 00 0 43 x�o --- RE,4LTY Bamr m - -K III ooLLC —� WD BEDRW ADA —�� kitchen TWD BATH da Bathr om j as dr hwa Igundry �__ L, \N rSJOE HU LOTmi:.r L —� rwo eeoeaoM 00 _ DW Y L TWO BATH 6° linen pantry 126]ST.1.FT. 00 kltahen �o EMEEq N� ONE BEDROOM 11 D x 12, O❑ ADA rJ L BOWMAN 1VMAN III 0 ° uEcxamar 66 S.FT. ❑ Bathmo ❑❑ BotM1raa ----- PLAZA 0 0 0 BREDEBPLCE BEDROOM0 0O 141 X HI ° -- o _ mai � marts G ,I ONE BEDROOM ❑ Batnrgam TWO 1166 SD FT. kitchen � L, F ue WBEDROOM � BE BEDROOM II"0'x 129 ❑ I I BASH A99 > 9"SO.FTn L ❑w oar 44 SQ.FT. L BgttT agar o--, e❑ I F_]:[]F_] L ❑❑ o 0 0F n 3RD FLOOR jol OA PLAN vo ,o� az ER L Bathroom T---- Feei ❑ FDOI , I� DINING AREA I41,k—'" DRESSING AREA 0 IL 14'3"x B'd' S1QC.asbt89'X 12'4" 0 ° DW I u"Ic BOOM Lim,R— BEDROOM n ❑ ❑ 143"x 13'0"� %141,. BEDROOM n Di IBEDROOMTa SO.Fr_ aLa Fr- O O THIRD FLOOR PLAN -AIF 1,.-1., 7 567ND SO,F A8 ND FL FT OF 3 FEDERICO ASSOCIATES E BE oerEaMweo, 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 BOWRIDGE REALTY o O LLC 7.—CE HILL TT- I I,T E/\S\N R IIA,f,NS.lii:]' PROPOSED 3 STORY MIXED USE BOWMAN PLAZA MULTI—FAMILY RESIDENTIAL / MEDERPLLE RETAIL WITH PARKING BELOW °`° °"'' BASEMENT PLAN 15 14 13 12 11 10 o�e BASEMENT PLAN A5 o,1I T 1/A"='Y)' OF 4 3/11/2016 BOWMAN PLAZA FRONT LEFT RENDERED VIEW.JPG(1542X792) f ■ � r 1 J y1 0' Y =�d1,EIN I flu Hill 1111. 111111 1IIIIII� ;;u; 1111::1111111111111 - 14k1- - gel. !3n— III!.I elal– `ic'aisi IIS III ■ ii ilr li lil it i i m'..'I t, 11'ii H I1111 VIII MIP nr: 1,Ia �Ilil 111111II1� ��--- ;�ii� IIS I Illlllllll11111� Viii �� hftp://www.ryebrook.org/Cit-e-Access/meetings/viewfiles.cfm?tid=31&mid=31367&viewfile=Bowman%20PIaza%20Front%201eft%20rendered%20view%2Ejpg 1/1 3/11/2016 BOWMAN PLAZA FRONT ELEV.WITH BAN K.JPG(1542X822) 3 r a ;,■ � vl; f `111111 SII ii1 11 1111 4 III MEN� �111 Ill !11 all � 111111 Irl f � I ���1+� — 111 Il !" Iii 1 1111 NrISO=- -IMIIII �111n1 — nlw r�rr r� ��IllIF bcr4b;f =111 Ni = gIIII 11111 if !Ir{ r111R �lIr111 = WAI - IllIrl 111111 111111 1 1• �•• i rlr m m r1l ul m err r !n1 mnl gill IOtis � y http://www.ryebrook.org/Cit-e-Access/meetings/viewfiI es.cfm?ti d=31&mid=31367&viewfile=Bowman%20PIaza%20Front%20EIev%2E%20with%20Bank%2Ejpg 1/1 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK PLANNING BOARD VILLAGE HALL, 938 KING STREET Thursday, November 13, 2014 - 7:30 p.m. AGENDA ROLL CALL MINUTES: Review of Minutes for September 11, 2014 and October 9, 2014 PUBLIC HEARING: 1. Review of an Application by Mr. and Mrs. Feinsod for Site Plan Approval, and Steep Slopes and Wetlands permits to construct a rear yard pool, decks and patios, re-grade property and a driveway expansion for the property located at 4 Hillandale Road, Rye Brook, NY, Parcel I.D. 136.21-1-14 • Possible Resolution 2. Review of an Application by Mark Mustacato on behalf of Mr. & Mrs. Bachmann for Site Plan Approval to construct a single-story addition, new front porch, rear deck and interior alterations for the property located at 92 Country Ridge Drive, Rye Brook, NY, Parcel I.D. 129.67-1-14 • Possible Resolution 3. Review of an Application by Mr. & Mrs. Randall for Site Plan Approval to re- grade the rear yard and construct retaining walls, for the property located at 130 North Ridge Street, Rye Brook, NY, Parcel I.D. 135.51-43 • Possible Resolution CONTINUED BUSINESS: 1. Review of an Application by Frank Madonna for approval of a Site Plan, Subdivision (Lot Merger) and a Petition for Re-zoning and Zoning Code Amendments, to construct a mixed use Multi-Family/Retail Building on property located at 80 Bowman Ave, Rye Brook, NY, Parcel I.D. 141.27-1-26,31,32 NEW BUSINESS: 1. Review of an application by Ridge Street Rye Brook LLC for an Amendment to the Special Use Permit, to modify the hours of operation for the property located at 79 South Ridge Street (aka 93 South Ridge Street), Rye Brook, NY, Parcel I.D. 141.27-1-13 LOCAL LAW CONSIDERATION ACTION ON NON-AGENDA MATTERS THE NEXT PLANNING BOARD MEETING: December 11, 2014 BOARD Mr. Domenic Accurso Mr. John Grzan Mr. Bill Laufer Mrs. Amy Schoen Mr. Dan Tartaglia Chairman Gary Zuckerman STAFF Philip Butler, Esq., Village Counsel M. Nowak, Jr., Public Works Superintendent and Village Engineer Fred Siefert, Public Access Coordinator/IT Marilyn Timpone-Mohamed, Village Planning Consultant BOARD OF TRUSTEES LIAISON: Trustee David Heiser Chairman Gary Zuckerman opened the meeting by asking everyone to join him in the Pledge of Allegiance. He welcomed everyone to the November 13, 2014 Planning Board meeting and noted that Mr. Robert Goodman was excused from the meeting. He asked that all cell phones be turned off, and that anyone addressing the Board do so from the podium, using the microphone. Chairman Zuckerman introduced the Board members and the Village Staff and explained the rules of procedure for the meeting. He made note for the public that the complete set of Planning Board Rules of Procedure can be found on the Village's website and that the meeting could be viewed on streaming video and on the Village's public access channel. He called for the first item on the agenda. MINUTES: Review of Minutes for September 11, 2014 and October 9, 2014 On a motion made by Amy Schoen, and seconded by John Grzan, the minutes were approved, as amended. The roll was called: -2- Domenic Accurso Voting Aye John Grzan Voting Aye Bill Laufer Voting Aye Amy Schoen Voting Aye Dan Tartaglia Voting Aye Chairman Gary Zuckerman Voting Aye The next matter was called before the Board. PUBLIC HEARING: 1. Review of an Application by Mr. and Mrs. Feinsod for Site Plan Approval, and Steep Slopes and Wetlands permits to construct a rear yard pool, decks and patios, re-grade property and a driveway expansion for the property located at 4 Hillandale Road, Rye Brook, NY, Parcel I.D. 136.21-1-14 • Possible Resolution Chairman Zuckerman noted that he recused himself as he is a neighbor of the applicant. He appointed Daniel Tartaglia as Acting Chairman on the application. Mr. Tartaglia called for a motion and second to open the public hearing. On a motion made by Amy Schoen, and seconded by Bill Laufer, the public hearing was opened. Mr. Nowak, Public Works Superintendent, called the roll: Domenic Accurso Voting Aye John Grzan Voting Aye Bill Laufer Voting Aye Amy Schoen Voting Aye Acting Chairman Dan Tartaglia Voting Aye Mr. Tartaglia asked about notification and was advised that the proper mailing had been made and Mr. Nowak received an affidavit. Mr. Tartaglia personally observed the signage posted on the property. Karl Weed, from Ahneman Kirby, LLC, appeared on behalf of the applicants. He began his presentation by noting that the project entails modification of the driveway. Initially the plan was to create a circular driveway. This was modified into a turn around area rather than a circular driveway. The remainder of the project remains the same. -3- The stormwater management plan has been modified based on the reduction in the size of the proposed driveway. The number of Cul-tec units has been reduced. However, the plan will still meet Village stormwater requirements. The steep slopes changed slightly in the rear of the property, and the shrinkage of the driveway and Cul-tec areas in the front yard diminished some of the slopes in the front yard. The wetlands buffer encroachment remains the same with better than a 2 for 1 ratio for mitigation plantings proposed. Mr. Michel Nowak, Village Engineer, noted that the number of Cul-tecs has been reduced to reflect the reduced impervious surface coverage being proposed. Dolph Rotfeld, Village Consultant, has reviewed the design of the project, but there are some minor technical matters that still need to be reviewed, including elevations and grades and the percolation calculations. Mr. John Grzan questioned whether the catch basins would catch all of the water from the impervious surfaces being added. He asked if a swale would be constructed. Mr. Weed noted that the runoff from the roof is tied into the Cul-tecs and catch basins. The driveway has basins that will also be directed to the Cul-tec system. Mr. Grzan asked about a strip of property adjacent to the property line. Mr. Weed felt that a swale would not catch the water on that portion of the property. The stormwater system will capture much more stormwater runoff than what is currently captured. There is a good deal of landscaping on the side of the property Mr. Grzan mentioned. Mr. Weed's company did the stormwater system on the Olin's property next door. There should not be any drainage issues between the two properties. Mr. Grzan asked why the pool equipment is so close to the house and property line. Mr. Weed responded that the electrical utilities are there and this is an area of the property that is underutilitzed. Mrs. Lara Feinsod addressed the Board noted that there is a row of trees that screens their property from the neighbors and the project will not affect the neighbors. They will be adding additional shrubs there as well to further screen the area. Mr. Tartaglia asked the Planning Consultant to go through her comments. Ms. Marilyn Timpone-Mohamed, Village Planning Consultant, addressed the Board. She noted that the steep slopes area has been reduced from the original plan. This was accomplished by removing the proposed circular driveway. The preservation of trees and a tree protection plan has been provided. Five (5) trees will be removed from the property. There is an additional tree near the garage that was in question. Mr. Weed noted that the modified plan reflects five (5) trees that are being removed. Ms. Timpone-Mohamed asked that if the Board takes action tonight, a condition should be placed regarding the number of trees being removed. -4- Ms. Timpone-Mohamed noted that a portion of the pool fence will be in the wetland buffer area, but the applicants are installing mitigation plantings beyond what is required for the loss of buffer. Therefore, there is sufficient mitigation provided for the fence incursion into the wetland. The exterior lighting is low energy LED light fixtures. The lighting will not cause any visual impacts to the neighbors. Mr. Tartaglia asked about stormwater management. Mr. Nowak responded that he hopes to have a memo from Dolph Rotfeld shortly. He stated that the hydro calculations require additional review time. The overall design and intent of the stormwater management plan is accurate. Mr. Tartaglia called for members of the public wishing to address the Board in support or opposition to the application. Annabelle Gamson of 6 Hillandale Road addressed the Board. She questioned the tree removals and wanted to make sure that removal of trees will not impact her privacy. Mr. Weed pointed out the trees on the plan that will be removed. He noted that one tree is diseased and that is the reason for its removal. Mrs. Feinsod noted that none of the trees along the property line will be removed. The tree towards the rear of the property that is being removed should not impact the Gamsons. A significant amount of new plantings will be added in the rear yard. These plantings will increase the screening on the applicants' property. Mr. Grzan questioned the efficacy of the landscaping plan because it does not show plantings around the pool equipment. Ms. Timpone-Mohamed noted that a new landscape plan had been submitted. The applicant indicated that the pool equipment is not near the Gamsons' home. The applicants said they will provide additional screening for the pool equipment. Mr. Nowak confirmed that the pool equipment is about 100' from the Gamson home. There being no additional discussion, Acting Chairman Tartaglia called for a motion and a second to close the public hearing. On a motion made by Ms. Schoen, and seconded by Mr. Grzan, the public hearing was closed. The roll was called: Domenic Accurso Voting Aye -5- John Grzan Voting Aye Bill Laufer Voting Aye Amy Schoen Voting Aye Acting Chairman Dan Tartaglia Voting Aye Mr. Tartaglia asked for the consensus of the Board members on the application. The Board discussed the additional screening and the reduction in the number of Cul-tec units. Having fully vetted the application, Mr. Tartaglia called for the resolution. Philip Butler, Esq., Village Counsel, read the resolution into the record: November 13, 2014 APPROVED 5-0— RESOLUTION APPROVAL OF SITE PLAN APPLICATION, STEEP SLOPES WORK PERMIT AND WETLANDS PERMIT IN CONNECTION WITH THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW IN-GROUND SWIMMONG POOL, DECK, PATIO, RELATED IMPROVEMENTS AND A DRIVEWAY EXPANSION AT 4 HILLANDALE ROAD WHEREAS, Karl H. Weed of Ahneman Kirby, LLC, on behalf of Jonathan and Lara Feinsod (the "Applicants"), has submitted an application for Site Plan approval, a Steep Slopes Work Permit and a Wetlands Permit to construct a new in-ground swimming pool, pool deck, pool patio, related improvements, and a driveway expansion at 4 Hillandale Road in the R-25 zoning district. Said premises being known as Section 21, Block 1, Lot 14 on the Town of Rye Tax Assessor's Map; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board reviewed the following plans and application materials in connection with the proposed Application: 1. Revised Exterior Building Permit Application 2. Revised Site Plan Application and Checklist 3. Tree Removal Permit Application 4. Revised Short Environmental Assessment Form 5. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan prepared by Ahneman Kirby, Riverside, C.T. dated June 25, 2014 6. Memorandum to the Planning Board from the Building and Fire Inspector dated October 28, 2014 7. Memorandum to the Planning Board from the Building and Fire Inspector dated July 24, 2014 -6- 8. Topographical Survey, prepared by Ahneman Kirby, Riverside, C.T. dated July 11, 2014 9. Engineer's Plans, prepared by Ahneman Kirby, Riverside, C.T.: Sheet Number Sheet Title Dated C-1 Cover Sheet 6/18/14 rev. 10/22/14 T-1 Existing Topographic Survey Map 7/11/14 SP-1 Proposed Site Plan 6/18/14 rev. 10/22/14 SP-1 Proposed Site Plan Detail Sheet 6/18/14 rev. 10/22/14 SE-1 Site Sedimentation & Erosion Control Plan 6/18/14 rev. 10/22/14 SL-1 Existing and Proposed Steep Slope Plan 6/18/14 rev. 10/22/14 EW-I Existing Water Shed Plan 6/18/14 PW-I Proposed Watershed Plan 6/18/14 rev. 10/22/14 10.Landscape Architect's Plans, prepared by Tramontano and Rowe, Greenwich, C.T.: Sheet Number Sheet Title Dated LA-1 Landscape Development Plan 7/3/14 rev. 10/20/14 LA-2 Deck Layout and Site Details 7/9/14 rev. 10/20/14 11.Memorandum to the Planning Board from the Village Planning Consultant, dated November 3, 2014 and WHEREAS, on November 13, 2014, the Planning Board of the Village of Rye Brook, pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA), determined the proposed action is a Type II Action requiring no additional review under SEQRA; and WHEREAS, the Village Planning Consultant, Village staff and the Planning Board have reviewed the information and submitted comments regarding the Application; and -7- WHEREAS, on November 13, 2014, the Planning Board opened a public hearing on the subject Application, at which time all persons interested were given an opportunity to speak on behalf of or in opposition to said Application, and WHEREAS, the Planning Board closed the public hearing on November 13, 2014; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board is familiar with the site and all aspects of the Application. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Village of Rye Brook Planning Board hereby approves the Application referenced herein, upon the following conditions: 1. The number, species and location of replacement trees for the project shall be approved by the Village Engineer prior to issuance of a building permit; 2. The applicant shall provide, as part of the approved plans, screening for the pool equipment to the satisfaction of the Village Engineer; and 3. The Village Engineer shall review and be satisfied with the results of the drainage report prepared by Dolph Rotfeld's office prior to issuance of a building permit. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that no permits shall be issued until the Applicants have paid to the Village all applicable fees and professional review fees incurred in connection with review of this Application. On a motion made by Ms. Schoen, and seconded by Mr. Grzan, the resolution was adopted. The roll was called: Domenic Accurso Voting Aye John Grzan Voting Aye Bill Laufer Voting Aye Amy Schoen Voting Aye Acting Chairman Dan Tartaglia Voting Aye Chairman Zuckerman called for the next item on the agenda: 2. Review of an Application by Mark Mustacato on behalf of Mr. & Mrs. Bachmann for Site Plan Approval to construct a single-story addition, new front porch, rear deck and interior alterations for the property located at 92 Country Ridge Drive, Rye Brook, NY, Parcel I.D. 129.67-1-14 -8- • Possible Resolution Chairman Zuckerman asked for a motion to open the public hearing. On a motion made by Ms. Schoen, and seconded by Mr. Grzan, the public hearing was opened. The roll was called: Domenic Accurso Voting Aye John Grzan Voting Aye Bill Laufer Voting Aye Amy Schoen Voting Aye Dan Tartaglia Voting Aye Chairman Zuckerman Voting Aye Chairman Zuckerman gave an overview of the application for the Board and members of the public. Jurisdiction of the Board is predicated on the proposed increase of the gross floor area by more than 50%. The proposed application required two area variances, both of which were granted by the Zoning Board of Appeals on November 4, 2014. The Village Engineer recommended that the need for a new topographical survey be waived. To date, all planning considerations in Ms. Timpone-Mohamed's planning memorandum have been addressed. Mr. Mustacato, architect for the applicants, addressed the Board. He reviewed the application and noted that there are no trees to be removed and no site lighting to be installed. The stormwater system for the property will comply with requirements set by the Village. Chairman Zuckerman called for members of the public wishing to address the Board in support or opposition to the application. There being none, he called for a motion to close the public hearing. On a motion made by Ms. Schoen, and seconded by Mr. Bill Laufer, the public hearing was closed. The roll was called: Domenic Accurso Voting Aye John Grzan Voting Aye Bill Laufer Voting Aye Amy Schoen Voting Aye Dan Tartaglia Voting Aye Chairman Zuckerman Voting Aye -9- Philip Butler, Esq., read the following resolution: November 13, 2014 APPROVED 6-0— RESOLUTION APPROVAL OF A SITE PLAN APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT A SECOND- STORY ADDITION, A COVERED ENTRY PORCH, A ONE-STORY GARAGE EXTENTION, A ONE-STORY ADDITION AND A NEW REAR DECK AT 92 COUNTRY RIDGE DRIVE WHEREAS, Mark Mustacato, AIA, on behalf of Michael and Sarin Bachmann (the "Applicants"), has submitted an application for Site Plan approval for the construction of a second-story addition, a covered entry porch, a one-story garage extension, a one-story addition and a new rear deck at 92 Country Ridge Drive in the R- 15 zoning district. Said premises being known as Section 129.67, Block 1, Lot 14 on the Town of Rye Tax Assessor's Map; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board reviewed the following plans and application materials in connection with the proposed Application: 1. Exterior Building Permit Application 2. Site Plan Application and Checklist 3. Property Survey prepared by Thomas C. Merritts Land Surveyors, P.C., Pleasantville, N.Y., dated September 29, 2014 4. Letter to the Village Engineer from Mark Mustacato, RMG Associates, Harrison, N.Y., dated October 2, 2014 5. Rye Brook Building and Fire Inspector's Zoning Analysis Memorandum to the Planning Board dated August 18, 2014 6. Architect's Plans, prepared by RMG Associates, Harrison, N.Y.: Sheet Number Sheet Title Dated A-1 Zoning Charts and General Notes 6/18/14 A-2 Details and Site Plan 6/18/14 rev. 10/2/14 A-3 Exterior Elevations 6/18/14 A-4 Exterior Elevations 6/18/14 A-5 First Floor Plans 6/18/14 -10- A-6 Second Floor and Lower Floor Plans 6/18/14 and WHEREAS, on November 13, 2014, the Planning Board of the Village of Rye Brook, pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA), determined the proposed action is a Type II Action requiring no additional review under SEQRA; and WHEREAS, the Village Planning Consultant, Village staff and the Planning Board have reviewed the information and submitted comments regarding the Application; and WHEREAS, on November 13, 2014, the Planning Board opened a public hearing on the subject Application, at which time all persons interested were given an opportunity to speak on behalf of or in opposition to said Application, and WHEREAS, the Planning Board closed the public hearing on November 13, 2014; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board is familiar with the site and all aspects of the Application. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Village of Rye Brook Planning Board hereby approves the Application referenced herein; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that no permits shall be issued until the Applicants have paid to the Village all applicable fees and professional review fees incurred in connection with review of this Application. On a motion made by Ms. Schoen, and seconded by Mr. Laufer, the resolution was adopted. The roll was called: Domenic Accurso Voting Aye John Grzan Voting Aye Bill Laufer Voting Aye Amy Schoen Voting Aye Dan Tartaglia Voting Aye Chairman Zuckerman Voting Aye -11- Chairman Zuckerman called for the next application on the agenda. 3. Review of an Application by Mr. & Mrs. Randall for Site Plan Approval to re-grade the rear yard and construct retaining walls, for the property located at 130 North Ridge Street, Rye Brook, NY, Parcel I.D. 135.51-43 • Possible Resolution Chairman Zuckerman gave an overview of the application. He added that jursidication of the Board is predicated on the property being in the Scenic Roads Overlay District and the need for a Steep Slopes Work Permit. Chairman Zuckerman called for a motion opening the public hearing. On a motion made by Ms. Schoen, and seconded by Mr. Laufer, the public hearing was declared open. The roll was called: Domenic Accurso Voting Aye John Grzan Voting Aye Bill Laufer Voting Aye Amy Schoen Voting Aye Dan Tartaglia Voting Aye Chairman Zuckerman Voting Aye Mr. & Mrs. Randall have experienced stormwater runoff coming from various properties to the west and north sides of their house. They have proposed a stormwater management plan which includes a Cultec system and retaining walls to divert the water flow. Negliable new impervious surface coverage (from the retaining walls is being added to the property. Ms. Timpone-Mohamed, Village Planning Consultant, noted that there were some outstanding items that needed to be addressed, and the applicant has provided revisions to the plans. The Village received a new topographical survey. The applicant has redesigned the walls to balance the cut and fill, meaning that any soil removed will be used to re-grade the property. There is a 1,348-square-foot disturbance of steep slopes in total. She believes this to be the minimum amount of disturbance necessary to meet the applicant's needs. Ms. Timpone-Mohamed had no further comments. -12- Mr. Nowak noted that the site plan has been reviewed by Dolph Rotfeld's office. No objection to the plan or the site and storm water management design has been received. The walls and terraces are used to redirect the water around the house. The project does not require dry wells by Code because the additional impervious surface coverage added is under 400 square feet, but the applicant is adding them anyway. Erosion control has been addressed by the landscape architect. Chairman Zuckerman asked Mr. Nowak if this work will affect any of the neighbors. Mr. Nowak explained that the applicants are proposing to redirect the water flow around the home and away from their property. The applicants are not adding significant areas of impervious surfaces or increasing the amount of storm water runoff. There will be a net decrease in the runoff because a portion will be collected by dry wells and drains. Mr. Accurso confirmed that the new survey that was received by the Village was sent today. He confirmed that the review of the application was based on the new survey and not the older one. Chairman Zuckerman called for members of the public wishing to address the Board in support or opposition. Phyllis Fratarcangeli of 147 North Ridge Street addressed the Board. She argued that her property is most affected by this work. She never heard of flooding on the Randall's property until now. A drywell will be constructed directly across from her home and it causes her concern. When resurfacing her driveway she was warned that water drainage cannot be aimed towards a neighbor's property. She felt that this application was doing just that. She noted that she was hit with a $10,000 loss during storm Irene in 2011. She read a letter written to Rob Astorino into the record. She noted that she had difficulty with the drain. The water comes from her neighbor's property and the street is sloping towards her house. There being no further comments from the public, Chairman Zuckerman called for a motion to close the public hearing. On a motion made by Ms. Schoen, and seconded by Mr. Grzan, the public hearing was closed. The roll was called: Domenic Accurso Voting Aye John Grzan Voting Aye Bill Laufer Voting Aye Amy Schoen Voting Aye Dan Tartaglia Voting Aye Chairman Zuckerman Voting Aye -13- Attorney Butler read the following resolution: November 13, 2014 APPROVED 6-0— RESOLUTION APPROVAL OF A SITE PLAN APPLICATION AND STEEP SLOPES WORK PERMIT IN CONNECTION WITH THE CONSTRUCTION OF NEW RETAINING WALLS, RE-GRADING OF LAND AND INSTALLATION OF STORMWATER MANAGEMENT STRUCTURES AT 130 NORTH RIDGE STREET WHEREAS, Chris Tramutola, Landscape Architect, on behalf of Martin and Stephanie Randall (the "Applicants"), has submitted an application for Site Plan approval and Steep Slopes Work Permit in connection with the construction of new retaining walls, re-grading of the rear yard and installation of stormwater management structures at 130 North Ridge Street in the R-12 zoning district. Said premises being known as Section 135.51, Block 1, Lot 43 on the Town of Rye Tax Assessor's Map; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board reviewed the following plans and application materials in connection with the proposed Application: 1. Site Plan Application and Submittal Checklist 2. Fence/Wall/Gate Permit Application 3. Short Environmental Assessment Form 4. Topographic Survey, prepared by Badey and Watson, P.C., Cold Spring, N.Y. dated September 24, 2007, revised September 28, 2007 5. Landscape Architect's Plans, prepared by Alloy Landscape Architecture, Brooklyn, N.Y.: Sheet Number Sheet Title Dated L-T Title Sheet 6/18/2014 rev.10/30/2014 L-Z Zoning Plan 6/18/2014 rev.10/30/2014 L-50 Existing Conditions Plan 6/18/2014 rev.10/30/2014 L-51 Contact Sheet 6/18/2014 rev.10/30/2014 L-100 Removals Plan 6/18/2014 rev.10/30/2014 -14- L-200 Materials Plan 6/18/2014 rev.10/30/2014 L-300 Grading and Drainage Plan 6/18/2014 rev.10/30/2014 L-301 Slope Analysis Plan 6/18/2014 rev.10/30/2014 L-400 Planting Plan 6/18/2014 rev.10/30/2014 L-500 Site Details 6/18/2014 L-501 Site Details 6/18/2014 and WHEREAS, on November 13, 2014, the Planning Board of the Village of Rye Brook, pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA), determined the proposed action is a Type II Action requiring no additional review under SEQRA; and WHEREAS, the Village Planning Consultant, Village staff and the Planning Board have reviewed the information and submitted comments regarding the Application; and WHEREAS, on November 13, 2014, the Planning Board opened a public hearing on the subject Application, at which time all persons interested were given an opportunity to speak on behalf of or in opposition to said Application, and WHEREAS, the Planning Board closed the public hearing on November 13, 2014; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board is familiar with the site and all aspects of the Application. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Village of Rye Brook Planning Board hereby approves the Application referenced herein; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that no permits shall be issued until the Applicants have paid to the Village all applicable fees and professional review fees incurred in connection with review of this Application. There were no conditions placed on this approval. Discussion on the Resolution: Mr. Laufer questioned if the re-grading will shift the water towards the neighbor's home. Mr. Nowak responded that the sheet flow will be directed around the house, to the north and south sides, towards the drywells. In addition, there are some curtain drains on the south and north sides to infiltrate additional flow. -15- Chairman Zuckerman questioned, again, whether this work would adversely affect the neighbors. The response to that question was that it would not. There have been engineering studies done to confirm that, for most storms, the runoff would be retained on the property. Mr. Accurso asked about a note on the plans. The applicant's representative confirmed that the drains lead onto the Randall's front yard. If there is overflow, it will puddle on the Randall's front yard. There is no calculation since there is an insignificant amount of impervious surfaces being added. However, he assumed a two-year 24-hour storm which is the standard for much of Westchester County. Mr. Nowak noted that Rye Brook has a stricter stormwater Code than other municipalities. Per Rye Brook's Code, this applicant is not required to install a stormwater management system. The applicant has proposed mitigation and, in essence, is reducing the net amount of runoff from the site. Mr. Accurso expressed concern that the front yard could overflow. Mr. Nowak noted that this property is bordered by a road that is higher than the front yard. The front yard is a depressed area. There is a storm drain about 30' from the house. The runoff runs south. Any sheet flow escaping the property will head south into the storm drain. Dan Tartaglia added that he has never seen stormwater cross the street. On a motion made by Ms. Schoen, and seconded by Mr. Grzan, the resolution was approved. The roll was called: Domenic Accurso Voting Aye John Grzan Voting Aye Bill Laufer Voting Aye Amy Schoen Voting Aye Dan Tartaglia Voting Aye Chairman Zuckerman Voting Aye Chairman Zuckerman called for the next application on the agenda. CONTINUED BUSINESS: 1) Review of an Application by Frank Madonna for approval of a Site Plan, Subdivision (Lot Merger) and a Petition for Re-zoning and Zoning Code Amendments, to construct a mixed use Multi-Family/Retail Building on property located at 80 Bowman Ave, Rye Brook, NY, Parcel I.D. 141.27-1- 26,31,32 -16- Chairman Zuckerman called for a review of the application. He noted that the applicant revised the sketch plan reviewed in August. The application proposes a three-story mixed use building with 19 units, retail space and 44 parking spaces. The components of the application are site plan approval and a lot merger, on which the Planning Board is the approval authority. The applicant requests that the property be re-zoned back to C-1. The applicant filed a petition for re-zoning with the Board of Trustees, which has referred the petition to the Planning Board for report and recommendation. At the October meeting, the Planning Board authorized circulation of a notice of intent to be lead agency pursuant to SEQRA. However, the notice has not yet been circulated. Chairman Zuckerman asked that Ms. Timpone-Mohamed review the SEQRA classifications and her reasons for classifying the application as an Unlisted Action. Ms. Timpone-Mohamed gave a general overview of the classifications under SEQRA. After classification is made and the Board is the lead agency, after circulation of the notice of intent, the Board must look at all of the information provided by the applicant and must make a determination of environmental significance. If the application is likely to result in one or more adverse environmental impacts, a positive declaration is declared and an environmental impact statement must be prepared. If the project will not result in any adverse environmental impacts or if the application is modified to eliminate minor impacts, then the Board can adopt a negative declaration, which will end the SEQR review process. The Board and other involved agencies can then go on to act on the site plan and the other approvals. The notice of intent has not yet been circulated because the applicant was asked to provide a long form EAF. Those materials were recently received. The Board discussed SEQRA procedure and the proposed notice of intent prepared by the Planning Consultant. Mr. Tartaglia opined that the project is not a Type I or Type 11 Action. Chairman Zuckerman asked if the applicant has reviewed the Planning Consultant memo. Mr. Federico indicated that he had not read the memorandum. Chairman Zuckerman indicated to the applicants that, going forward, the Planning Board will want to see the application modified to reduce the need for variances to comply with zoning and so it will conform to the Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Grzan opined that the Board of Trustees should be the lead agency on this application since it must approve the zone change. Chairman Zuckerman indicated that the Board of Trustees will get the notice of intent. If it prefers to be lead agency on the application, it can let its desire known and challenge the Planning Board's lead agency status. -17- Mr. Accurso asked for a list of the agencies that will receive the notice of intent. Ms. Timpone-Mohamed responded. Mr. Tartaglia added that the Planning Board is most frequently the lead agency, even on larger projects. Ms. Timpone-Mohamed added that the Board of Trustees looks to the Planning Board for a report and recommendation, so it is logical that the Planning Board be the lead agency on the whole project. Chairman Zuckerman noted that the subject property will revert to C-1 zoning automatically in November, 2015, if nothing else is done. Mr. Federico noted that he made bulk recommendations for the site, which were submitted to the Board of Trustees in the petition. Ms. Timpone-Mohamed indicated that she provided comments on the petition in her memorandum. She provided Mr. Federico with a hard copy of her memorandum. Mr. Federico reviewed the updates to the plan. He asked about the required density for the project. He said that issue is not in the Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Tartaglia asked for the density in the C-1 zone. Mr. Timpone-Mohamed explained that the Comprehensive Plan contemplates redevelopment of the C-1 zone as a mixed use zone with commercial and residential uses. The zone changes that would allow this project to be built will allow other properties to be similarly redeveloped. She added that the proposed location of the building and the amount of parking are not in conformity with the Comprehensive Plan. The Board need not change the FAR for the C-1 zone. It can keep it at 1.0 and that could be sufficient. The density of 19 proposed apartments is not advisable and requires too much parking for the site. Ms. Schoen asked about construction issues relating to the proposed third floor. Ms. Timpone-Mohamed stated that those are state fire prevention and building code requirements, which will need to be satisfied. Mr. Tartaglia asked what the constraint on density will be. Mr. Timpone-Mohamed said the current FAR of 1.0 should be a working stating point. Changing the setbacks should also be considered to bring the buildings up to the street. If enacted these bulk requirements would apply to all properties in the C-1 zone. Mr. Tartaglia said he disfavors changing the zoning because it will make other properties non-conforming uses. Mr. Tartaglia and Chairman Zuckerman expressed possible disagreement. Chairman Zuckerman said it may be necessary to create a new zoning district for this project. Mr. Grzan said that the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan should be a catalyst for changing the zoning anyway. Chairman Zuckerman agreed and added that this is the first application coming before the Board since adoption of the Comprehensive Plan. -18- Chairman Zuckerman asked Ms. Timpone-Mohamed to prepare a zoning map of the C-1 zone and a list of properties explaining what exists in the C-1 zone. Ms. Timpone- Mohamed indicated that this information is available in the Comprehensive Plan files. Chairman Zuckerman asks applicant to show the Board a revised site plan showing the proposed building closer to the front property line on Bowman Avenue. Chairman Zuckerman called for the next application on the agenda. The application was adjourned to December 11, 2014. NEW BUSINESS: 1) Review of an application by Ridge Street Rye Brook LLC for an Amendment to the Special Use Permit, to modify the hours of operation for the property located at 79 South Ridge Street (aka 93 South Ridge Street), Rye Brook NY, Parcel I.D. 141.27-1-13 This application is a request to amend the Special Use Permit for the Shell Gas Station to increase its hours of operation. Leo Napier, attorney for the applicant, addressed the Board. This matter was referred to the Planning Board by the Board of Trustees. He gave a brief overview of the application. Just the pumps will be affected by the increased hours. There is no proposal for a canopy over the pumps. The applicant would like to extend the hours later into the night as well. They would like the same hours as the Rye Ridge Shopping Center. The existing repair bays will continue to operate on the premises. There will not be a convenience store. The applicant doesn't know if a convenience store is a permitted or special use at this time. There are usually approximately three or four employees on site. Ms. Schoen asked for clarification on the repair shop as opposed to body work. There is a parking lot on the site. Chairman Zuckerman asked about the parking on the premises. Mr. Napier confirmed there is a parking lot but indicated there is no vehicle storage. Mr. Tartaglia disagreed and explained that there are several trucks and passenger vehicles without license plates being kept on the property. Mr. Napier was not aware of any violations, but indicated he would discuss the matter with his client. Chairman Zuckerman asked about the conformity of the application with the Comprehensive Plan. Marilyn Timpone-Mohamed opined that the Comprehensive Plan envisions a mixed use, commercial and residential zone. It does not contemplate -19- disruption of the street wall by service stations. Over time, these uses will be phased out by further changes in zoning or by attrition. Mr. Tartaglia asked about possible remedial work on the property over the summer. Mr. Napier was unfamiliar with the work. Mr. Nowak indicated that the pumps and piping were upgraded. Mr. Laufer noted that the application is to open the gas station two hours earlier. He asked if opening the pumps two hours earlier will affect traffic. Ms. Timpone- Mohamed indicated that assuming additional services are not being offered, it should not. Mr. Tartaglia explained that the pumps open now at 8AM, which causes a line of cars in the height of rush hour. Opening the pumps earlier might help the situation. Mr. Grzan agreed an earlier opening time is a good idea. Chairman Zuckerman directed the Board's attention to the prior approval for the hours of operation for the Mobile Station formerly located across the street. He felt that the hours of operation should mirror what was approved for the Mobile Station and that was 6:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. Monday thru Saturday, and 8:00 a.m. – 7:00 p.m. on Sundays. Mr. Grzan concurred. Chairman Zuckerman then reviewed a list of conditions, suggested by Mr. Tartaglia, which he felt should be included in the amended Special Permit approval. Mr. Grzan indicated that many of these conditions were in the original approval for the Special Permit. Therefore it is a matter of enforcement. The Chairman explained that the conditions should be carried over. Mr. Tartaglia added that the conditions have been re-worded. The Board discussed parking on the premises. Mr. Tartaglia reviewed the parking requirements under the Code. Chairman Zuckerman noted that if the conditions on the Special Permit approval are followed, the parking on the property would be sufficient. Chairman Zuckerman asked for the resolution to be read. Attorney Butler read the following resolution. November 13, 2014 APPROVED 6-0— RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SUBMISSION OF A REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES ON A PROPOSED SPECIAL PERMIT -20- AMENDMENT FOR PROPERTY AT 79 SOUTH RIDGE STREET (AKA 93 SOUTH RIDGE STREET) BE IT RESOLVED, that the Rye Brook Planning Board hereby adopts the attached Report and Recommendation to the Rye Brook Board of Trustees on a proposed Special Permit Amendment modifying the hours of operation for the gas station located at 79 South Ridge Street (aka 93 South Ridge Street). -21- REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION FROM THE RYE BROOK PLANNING BOARD TO THE RYE BROOK BOARD OF TRUSTEES ON A PROPOSED SPECIAL PERMIT AMENDMENT FOR PROPERTY AT 79 SOUTH RIDGE STREET (AKA 93 SOUTH RISGE STREET) APPLICATION OVERVIEW The Rye Brook Board of Trustees (the "BOT") is currently considering an application by Ridge Street Rye Brook, LLC for approval of an amendment to the existing Special Use Permit for the gas station located at 79 South Ridge Street (aka 93 South Ridge Street) to increase the hours of operation for the property from 8:00a.m.- 9:00p.m. to 6:00a.m.-9:00p.m. seven days a week. On October 15, 2014, the BOT referred the application to the Planning Board for consideration and for a report and recommendation thereon. DISCUSSION The Planning Board members reviewed and discussed the application at the Planning Board's meeting on November 13, 2014, at which time the Village staff and Village consultants also provided input. RECOMMENDATIONS Based on discussions as its November 13, 2014 meeting, the Planning Board hereby recommends that the BOT approve the application, with the following recommendations: Planning Board November 13,2014 Page 22 I. The Board, in preparation of this Report and Recommendation, has reviewed the Special Use Permit and the amendment thereto for the gas station formerly located across the street at 105 South Ridge Street (now TD Bank). That permit, as amended, granted hours of operation of 6:OOAM to 9PM, Monday through Saturday, and 8:OOAM to 7:OOPM on Sundays. The Board, therefore, recommends that the same hours of operation be approved for the instant Special Use Permit for 79/93 South Ridge Street. 2. The Board recommends that the following additional conditions be imposed and/or restated on the amended Special Use Permit as these conditions, or similar conditions, were placed on the original Special Use Permit granted for the premises: a. Except as set forth in condition (b.), there shall be no overnight storage of motor vehicles, trucks, trailers, recreational vehicles, boats, snow mobiles, or personal watercraft on the premises outside of the building. b. No vehicle which is waiting for service or which has been serviced in the service bays on the premises shall be parked there for a period exceeding 48 hours. This restriction shall not apply to vehicles parked inside the service bays. c. The lease or rental of utility trailers, rental trucks and automobiles on the premises is prohibited. d. The washing or detailing of vehicles on the premises is prohibited. e. Auto-body work on the premises is prohibited. f. Gasoline tanker trucks making deliveries to the premises shall not obstruct the public right-of-way or sidewalks. Dated:Rye Brook, New York November 13, 2014 APPROVED AT THE NOVEMBER 13, 2014 MEETING OF THE RYE BROOK PLANNING BOARD BY A VOTE OF 6- to -0 Planning Board November 13,2014 Page 23 ACCEPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Ayes: ACCURSO, GRZAN, LAUFER, SCHOEN, TARTAGLIA, ZUCKERMAN Nays: Abstain: Excused: GOODMAN APPROVING THE REFERRAL RESOLUTION: Ayes: ACCURSO, GRZAN, LAUFER, SCHOEN, TARTAGLIA, ZUCKERMAN Nays: Abstain: Excused: GOODMAN On a motion made by Ms. Schoen, and seconded by Mr. Grzan, the resolution was approved. The roll was called: Domenic Accurso Voting Aye John Grzan Voting Aye Bill Laufer Voting Aye Amy Schoen Voting Aye Dan Tartaglia Voting Aye Chairman Zuckerman Voting Aye There being no further business before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at 9:55 p.m. Planning Board November 13,2014 Page 24 VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK PLANNING BOARD VILLAGE HALL, 938 KING STREET Thursday, December 11, 2014 - 7:30 p.m. AGENDA PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL MINUTES PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED BUSINESS: 1. Review of a Site Plan Application by Frank Madonna for approval to construct a mixed use multiple dwelling on property located at 80 Bowman Ave, Rye Brook, NY, Parcel I.D. 141.27-1-26, 31, 32 NEW BUSINESS: 2. Review of an application by 8 Edgewood, LLC, (Frank Chiarello) for approval of a Site Plan, and a Wetlands Permit to tear down an existing home and construct a new single-family dwelling on property located at 8 Edgewood Drive, Rye Brook, NY, Parcel I.D. 135.28-1-28 3. Review of an application by George and Melissa Wood for approval of a Site Plan, and a Steep Slopes Work Permit to expand the second floor and add a retaining wall to an existing single-family dwelling on property located at 25 Lincoln Ave, Rye Brook, NY, Parcel I.D. 135.65-1-46 LOCAL LAW CONSIDERATION: 4. Consideration of a referral from the Village Board of Trustees of amendments to Chapters 217 and 250 of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook regarding impervious surface coverage. ACTION ON NON-AGENDA MATTERS THE NEXT PLANNING BOARD MEETING: January 8, 2015 Planning Board Meeting Page 1 December 11,2014 BOARD: Domenic Accurso, Jr. Robert Goodman John Grzan Bill Laufer Amy Schoen Dan Tartaglia Gary J. Zuckerman, Chairman STAFF: Michael Nowak, Superintendent of Public Works/Village Engineer Marilyn Timpone-Mohamed, Village Planning Consultant Phillip Butler, Esq., Village Counsel BOARD OF TRUSTEES LIAISON: David Heiser The meeting was opened with the Pledge of Allegiance. Gary Zuckerman, Chairman, welcomed everyone to the December 11, 2014 Planning Board meeting. He introduced the Board, Village Staff and Consultants. He asked that all cell phones be turned off for the duration of the meeting and instructed anyone addressing the Board to do so from the podium. It was noted that Planning Board meeting information can be found on the Village's website. That information includes agendas, and documents used by the Planning Board in their deliberations, and streaming videos of the meetings. Chairman Zuckerman called for the first matter on the agenda: CONTINUED BUSINESS: 1. Review of a Site Plan Application by Frank Madonna for approval of a Site Plan to construct a mixed-use multiple dwelling on property located at 80 Bowman Ave, Rye Brook, NY, Parcel I.D. 141.27-1-26, 31, 32 Chairman Zuckerman noted that the application involved several different actions. A subdivision (lot merger), application and a site plan application, for which the Planning Board is the approval authority, and a rezoning petition, for which the Board of Trustees is the approval authority and the Planning Board will provide a report and recommendations to the Trustees. The applicant's new submission was a revised site plan submitted in response to some of the comments received from the Planning Board, Village staff and the Village planning consultant. The notice of intent to be lead agency for review of the project under SEQRA was circulated on November 18, 2014. Planning Board Meeting Page 2 December 11,2014 Anthony Federico, architect for the applicant, addressed the Board. He noted that two memos were received; one from Mr. Izzo, Building Inspector and one from Mrs. Timpone-Mohamed, Village Consultant. He explained why the building was initially proposed with the residential entrance on Barber Place, and parking for the convenience of patrons and for handicapped accessibility of the ground-floor retail space proposed on the Bowman Avenue frontage of the property. Mrs. Marilyn Timpone-Mohamed, Village Planning Consultant from the firm of F.P. Clark Associates, addressed the Board regarding the parking area along Bowman Avenue, which was inconsistent with the Rye Brook Comprehensive Plan recommendations. To make the area more pedestrian friendly, the Comprehensive Plan recommends locating parking in the rear of lots, and locating the mixed use buildings closer to the street. The revised plan reduces the number of code revisions necessary to allow the project to be built under the Cl District regulations. Also discussed was the floor area ratio (FAR) of the CI zone, density, and required open space and the ways these items could be revised in the C1 zone to accommodate the mixed use project. It was noted that the project is the first mixed-use building application submitted after adoption of the Comprehensive Plan. Chairman Zuckerman felt that it would be appropriate to set up a sub-committee and work sessions with the Applicant, and then work sessions with the full Planning Board to resolve the site plan issues and explore alternatives to the proposed site plan. This was also the consensus of the Planning Board. A sub-committee that included a representative from the Board of Trustees, three members of the Planning Board, the planning consultant, the building inspector, and the Village attorney was formed and the matter was adjourned to the February 12, 2015 Planning Board meeting. Chairman Zuckerman called for the next matter on the agenda. He noted that he would recuse himself from review of the next application and Mr. Robert Goodman would be acting chairman for the review. NEW BUSINESS: 2. Review of an Application by 8 Edgewood, LLC, (Frank Chiarello) for Site Plan approval, and a Wetlands Permit to tear down an existing home and construct a new single-family dwelling on the property located at 8 Edgewood Drive, Rye Brook, NY, Parcel I.D. 135.28-1-28. Planning Board Meeting Page 3 December 11,2014 Mr. Goodman confirmed receipt of the Village consultant's memo by the applicant. The architect for the applicant reviewed the proposed project, including the wetlands, and the details of the project. The proposed front-yard and site yard setbacks were reviewed, as well as the location of the wetlands on the property, and the front yard and side height/setback ratio variances that would be required to accomplish the construction and meet the applicant's needs. A stormwater management plan was submitted. Catch basins are proposed. Mrs. Timpone-Mohamed, Village Consultant, reviewed the application. An important issue is moving the building envelope forward. The house as it stands now is 91 feet from the front property line; and the proposed home would be 78 feet from the front property line. She recommended that the building and site plans be revised to eliminate the need for the side height/setback ratio variance as this variance is not related to keeping the new home out of the wetland as the front yard variance is. She also noted that the property is within 2,000 feet of a remediated hazardous materials site for which more information should be provided. She clarified that elemental mercury was found on a nearby property at 55 Hillandale. Regarding wetlands, she pointed out that the entire project would be built within the wetland buffer. Therefore, mitigation for loss of buffer should be included in the plans. The property would be re-graded and a 24" diameter Maple Tree would be removed. An exterior lighting plan should be provided. Mr. Goldner, a resident of the area addressed the Board, questioning how deep into the property the project will go. He noted that there is ponded water in the rear of the lot behind the current home. Acting Chairman Goodman noted that a public hearing would be held on the matter. Mr. Goldman's comments were considered educational for the applicant. It was noted that this area floods after a good rain. Mr. Accurso requested that the applicant submit a revised plan that includes the applicable flood zone for the property. The Board discussed basements for homes in the area. The applicant's consultant stated that the current home has a sump pump to handle basement flooding during a heavy rain. The submission must be complete and must respond to all questions raised by the Board, Consultants, and staff. Also to be addressed is mitigation for loss of wetland buffer. The wetland is a sloped wetland. It was noted that the wetland is not being disturbed but rather only the buffer. Additional shrub or tree plantings, which were recommended, would slow the water running down the rear-yard slopes, allowing more of the run-off to infiltrate into the ground. Landscaping that traps and holds water should be planted. Planning Board Meeting Page 4 December 11,2014 Dolph Rotfeld, Village Engineering Consultant, will review drainage and stormwater management. The two variances needed are a front yard setback variance and a side height/setback ratio variance for one side of the home. The side yard variance is self-created by the design of the home, the size of the home. The application for variances must be heard by the Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA) and the Board discussed whether the application should be sent to the ZBA immediately. The applicant stated that the plan would be reviewed and modified with respect to eliminating the side height/setback ratio variance. The consensus of the Planning Board was for the applicant to present its case to the Zoning Board of Appeals; then return to the Planning Board for site plan approval. The applicant was requested to submit a slope analysis. It was noted that information regarding the hazardous material remediation on the property was in the public record of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation and can easily be obtained by the applicant. The remediation work started at 55 Hillandale and continued outward and down-gradient to other properties. The Village was not party to the remediation. The applicant must review and provide the additional information requested. The applicant must substantiate that their site is clean and was be required to work with the Village's consultants to complete the information for the environmental assessment. Philip Butler, Esq., Village Counsel, was called upon to read the resolution: One condition in the resolution was removed at the request of the Board. Attorney Butler reviewed the resolution for the Board. It was noted that the size of the house may affect the steep slopes on the property. The Zoning Board of Appeals will determine if the requested variances are the minimum variances needed and if there is a need for the side height/setback variance. Mr. Accurso felt that the referral to the Zoning Board was premature as there were many outstanding items in the application. The applicant agreed to look at the height/setback ratio non-conformity. No recommendations to the Zoning Board were made, rather considerations were listed. The resolution was further reviewed and revised and the changes were summarized by the Village counsel. On a motion made by Mrs. Schoen and seconded by Mr. Laufer the role was called and the resolution was approved. Planning Board Meeting Page.5 December 11,2014 December 11, 2014 APPROVED: 4-2 RESOLUTION REFERRING AN APPLICATION TO THE RYE BROOK ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FOR APPROVAL OF A SITE PLAN TO DEMOLISH AN EXISTING SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE AND CONSTRUCT A NEW SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE AT 8 EDGEWOOD DRIVE VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK PLANNING BOARD WHEREAS, Charlie Brown, on behalf of Frank Chiarello (the "Applicant"), has submitted an Application for Site Plan approval to demolish an existing single-family residence and to construct a new single-family residence at 8 Edgewood Drive in the R- 25 zoning district. Said premises being further identified as Section 135.28, Block 1, Lot 28 on the Town of Rye Tax Assessor's Map; and WHEREAS, Village Code §250-19.1.J(2) prescribes a maximum side yard height/setback ratio of 1.30; and WHEREAS, the Applicant proposes construction of a new single-family residence with a side yard height/setback ratio of 1.80 on the south elevation of the new home, requiring a side yard height/setback ratio variance of 0.50; and WHEREAS, Village Code §250-19.1.G.(1)(a)[1] requires a minimum front yard setback of 158.75 inches; and WHEREAS, the Applicant proposes construction of a new single-family residence with a front yard setback of 77.2, requiring a front yard setback variance of 81.55 feet; and WHEREAS, the Applicant wishes to apply to the Rye Brook Zoning Board of Appeals for the above variances rather than modify the project to conform to the above- referenced sections of the Village Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board reviewed and considered the Application at its December 11, 2014 meeting, including the Planning Memorandum prepared by Frederick P. Clark Associates, dated December 9, 2014; and Planning Board Meeting Page 6 December 11,2014 WHEREAS, upon review of the subject application, the Planning Board had the following planning considerations for the Zoning Board of Appeals deliberation with respect to the requested variances: • The need for the front yard setback variance given the extensive wetlands on the property. • Whether the design of the proposed residence can be modified to reduce or eliminate the need for the side yard height/setback ratio variance. NOW THEREFORE BE, IT RESOLVED, that for the reasons stated herein, the Village of Rye Brook Planning Board hereby refers the application listed herein to the Zoning Board of Appeals for a determination on the required variances. Mr. Michel Nowak, Superintendent of Public Works, called the roll: Domenic Accurso, Jr. voting nay Robert Goodman voting aye John Grzan voting nay Bill Laufer voting aye Amy Schoen voting aye Daniel Tartaglia voting aye Gary J. Zuckerman, Chairman recused Adopted by four ayes and two nays. The consensus of the Board was to adjourn the application to the January 2015 Planning Board meeting and for the applicant work with the planning consultant to provide all the additional information requested. Chairman Zuckerman returned to the Board and thanked everyone for their attention to the 8 Edgewood matter. He called for the next item on the agenda: Planning Board Meeting Page 7 December 11,2014 3. Review of an application by George and Melissa Wood for approval of a site plan and Steep Slopes Work Permit to expand the second floor and add a retaining wall to an existing single-family dwelling on the property located at 25 Lincoln Ave, Rye Brook, NY, Parcel I.D. 135.65-1-46 Chairman Zuckerman reviewed the proposed construction for the Board and members of the public. This property is in the Scenic Road Overlay District and several variances will be requested of the Zoning Board. The house was conforming at the time of the construction. Sam Vieira, the project architect addressed the Board. He noted that Mr. Wood, the owner, was also in attendance. The second floor of the home has two very small bedrooms. The intent is to push up the roof and expand the second floor. The project is in the R-10 District, and the Scenic Road Overlay District that has increased front-yard setbacks. The garage is small and would be enlarged into the front yard setback 5 1/2 feet. Increasing the width of the garage for two cars requires increasing the width of the driveway. The yard behind the house is very small and steeply sloped. The current 2,300 square-foot home would be increased by 594 square feet to 2,973 square feet. The steep slope area to be disturbed to create more level useable area would need a one to four-foot high retaining wall to limit the disturbance to the slope. Mrs. Timpone-Mohamed noted that the applicant submitted a topographic survey before the meeting. The Building and Fire Inspector's analysis found that four variances are required by the project. These variances are the result of moving the house closer to the street, and the second floor addition. She believed the variances to be reasonable. She noted a situation where construction will be done within the drip line of one existing tree. She recommended moving the wall outside of the drip line or removing and replacing the tree. The recommendations for site lighting were briefly discussed, and she requested that a revised landscape plan be submitted to reduce the impact of the larger parking court. It was asked if the expanded house would be in scale with the other homes in the neighborhood. Mrs. Timpone-Mohamed responded that expanded house would not be out of scale with the other homes nearby. She pointed out that the houses on the same side of the street are all closer to the road than the homes on the other side. Mr. Grzan asked if the home owners considered moving the home back by 8 feet to comply with the front setback requirement. The Board discussed interpretation of the Code, which the Zoning Board of Appeals has the right to do. Planning Board Meeting Page 8 December 11,2014 Chairman Zuckerman proposed that the application be sent to the Zoning Board of Appeals with a revision to the referral resolution regarding the Scenic Road Overlay District. Attorney Butler reviewed the proposed change to the comment section of the resolution. Mr. Vieira noted that the driveway will be widened to meet the needs of a two-car garage entrance and that it is not a parking court. The Board discussed the driveway and parking on the property concluding that the Zoning Board would make the determination. Mr. Accurso asked if there would be any restoration of the stone wall located along the front of the property. Chairman Zuckerman noted that the wall would be reviewed at the public hearing along with the landscaping plan when the application comes back to the Planning Board. On a motion made by Amy Schoen, and seconded by Domenic Accurso, the referral resolution to the Zoning Board of Appeals was approved, as amended. Attorney Butler was asked to read the amended referral resolution: December 11, 2014 APPROVED: 7-0 RESOLUTION REFERRING AN APPLICATION TO THE RYE BROOK ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FOR APPROVAL OF A SITE PLAN TO CONSTRUCT A TWO- STORY ADDITION, SECOND-STORY ADDITION AND A DRIVEWAY EXPANSION AT 25 LINCOLN AVENUE VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK PLANNING BOARD WHEREAS, Samuel F. Vieira, on behalf of George and Melissa Wood (the "Applicants"), has submitted an Application for Site Plan approval to construct a two- story side addition, a second story addition and a driveway expansion at 25 Lincoln Avenue in the R-10 zoning district. Said premises being further identified as Section 135.65, Block 1, Lot 46 on the Town of Rye Tax Assessor's Map; and WHEREAS, said premises is located within the Scenic Roads Overlay District; and Planning Board Meeting Page 9 December 11,2014 WHEREAS, Village Code §250-7.F(6)(c) requires a minimum thirty-five-foot wide vegetative buffer in the front yard of properties within the Scenic Roads Overlay District; and WHEREAS, the Applicant proposes a second-story addition with a proposed one (1) foot incursion into the vegetative buffer, a two-story side addition with a proposed five (5) foot incursion into the vegetative buffer, and a driveway expansion with a proposed 10 foot incursion into the thirty-five-foot wide vegetative buffer, requiring vegetative buffer variances of one-foot, five-feet and a 10-feet, respectively; and WHEREAS, Village Code §§ 250-22.F(1) and 250-7.F(6)(b) require a minimum front yard setback of 45 feet on the subject property; and WHEREAS, the existing residence on the property provides a front yard setback of 34 feet, requiring an 11-foot front yard setback variance; and WHEREAS, the Applicant wishes to apply to the Rye Brook Zoning Board of Appeals for the above variances rather than modify the project to conform to the above- referenced sections of the Village Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board reviewed and considered the Application at its December 11, 2014 meeting, including the Planning Memorandum prepared by Frederick P. Clark Associates, dated December 10, 2014; and WHEREAS, upon review of the subject application, the Planning Board had the following planning considerations for the Zoning Board of Appeals deliberation with respect to the requested variances: • The proposed site and building plans will require four area variances from the Zoning Board of Appeals. All of the nonconformities are the result of the fact that the home, though conforming at the time of construction, was built before the SROD regulations increasing the minimum front yard were adopted. Other than the installation of the driveway expansion, the proposed construction would not create any additional nonconformities on the lot. Therefore, with the exception of the driveway expansion, it is our opinion that there would not be planning or environmental issues created if the other requested variances are granted. • Whether the driveway expansion can be reduced to maximize the distance it is set back from the front property line. Reducing the total area of the driveway expansion would minimize the variance required and help mitigate the visual impacts to the SROD. Planning Board Meeting Page 10 December 11,2014 NOW THEREFORE BE, IT RESOLVED, that for the reasons stated herein, the Village of Rye Brook Planning Board hereby refers the application listed herein to the Zoning Board of Appeals for a determination on the required variances. Mr. Michel Nowak, Superintendent of Public Works, called the roll: Domenic Accurso, Jr. voting aye Robert Goodman voting aye John Grzan voting aye Bill Laufer voting aye Amy Schoen voting aye Daniel Tartaglia voting aye Gary J. Zuckerman, Chairman voting aye Adopted by seven ayes and zero nays. A resolution was read by Mrs. Timpone-Mohamed setting a public hearing for the application for the February 12, 2015 Planning Board Meeting. December 11, 2014 APPROVED RESOLUTION SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING CONCERNING AN APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL AND APPROVAL OF A STEEP SLOPES WORK PERMIT FOR 25 LINCOLN AVENUE VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK PLANNING BOARD WHEREAS, property owners George and Melissa Wood submitted an application for approval of a site plan to construct a second-story addition, a covered entry porch, and an expansion of the garage into the side yard of the existing home located at 25 Lincoln Avenue in the R-10 District and the Scenic Road Overlay District (SROD), Section 135.65, Block 1, Lot 46 as shown on the Town of Rye Tax Assessor's Map. Planning Board Meeting Page 11 December 11,2014 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Village of Rye Brook Planning Board shall hold a Public Hearing on February 12, 2015 at 7:30 p.m., at Village Hall, 938 King Street, Rye Brook, New York to consider the application for site plan approval and approval of a Steep Slopes Work Permit; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Planning Board, pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) determines the Proposed Action to be a Type 2 Action requiring no further review pursuant to the requirements of SEQRA; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Applicant is directed to comply with Section 250-40 of the Village Code regarding notification. On a motion made by Mrs Schoen, and seconded by Mr. Laufer, the resolution was adopted. Mr. Nowak, Superintendent of Public Works, called the roll: Domenic Accurso, Jr. voting aye Robert Goodman voting aye John Grzan voting aye Bill Laufer voting aye Amy Schoen voting aye Daniel Tartaglia voting aye Gary J. Zuckerman, Chairman voting aye Adopted by seven ayes and zero nays. LOCAL LAW CONSIDERATION: 4. Consideration of a referral from the Village Board of Trustees of amendments to Chapters 217 and 250 of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook regarding Impervious Surface Coverage. Attorney Butler noted that the local law was drafted by his office. He reviewed the code amendments for the Board. The definition of impervious surface has been amended to include pervious materials unless those materials are properly installed such that their pervious character is ensured. The Chapter 217 and Chapter 250 of the Village's Code does not recognize permeable paving material. Materials that appear to be infiltrating can be constructed incorrectly resulting in pervious material that is actually impervious Planning Board Meeting Page 12 December 11,2014 coverage. Manufacturers give these materials a rating, which needs to be considered as well as following the accepted industry standards. Mr. Nowak noted that the efficiency of these types of materials as pervious coverage is contingent upon a drainage plan that must be appropriately designed and detailed on the plans. There have been issues regarding impervious surface coverage and discussions resulted from applications where pervious surface coverage is proposed but not properly constructed. An impervious surface is a surface through which water cannot readily infiltrate. Trustee David Heiser noted that there is the decision as to whether or not an item is previous or impervious, but also to be considered is the way the surface is installed. There is a problem with making a recommendation and the standards of permeability must be decided first. Chairman Zuckerman felt that further discussion was needed prior to the Planning Board making its report and recommendations. It was noted that the Code amendments were initiated by the Building Inspector and the Village Engineer. The matter was adjourned. There being no further business before the Board, Chairman Zuckerman called for a motion to adjourn the meeting. On a motion made by Mrs. Schoen and seconded by Mr. Goodman the meeting was adjourned at 10:05 p.m. The roll was called: Domenic Accurso, Jr. voting aye Robert Goodman voting aye John Grzan voting aye Bill Laufer voting aye Amy Schoen voting aye Daniel Tartaglia voting aye Gary J. Zuckerman, Chairman voting aye Planning Board Meeting Page 13 December 11,2014