HomeMy WebLinkAbout2015-02-24 - Board of Trustees Meeting Documents VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK
BOARD OF TRUSTEES MEETINGS
VILLAGE HALL, 938 KING STREET
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 24, 2015
7:00 P.M. —EXECUTIVE SESSION:
7:30 P.M. —REGULAR MEETING:
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
REPORT/PRESENTATIONS:
AFFORDABLE HOUSING:
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1) Public hearing considering a local law to amend Chapters 215, 235, 245 and
A258 of the Village Code for the creation of a Sustainability Committee.
RESOLUTIONS:
1) Considering a local law to amend Chapters 215, 235, 245 and A258 of the
Village Code for the creation of a Sustainability Committee.
2) Considering the referral of a site plan and zoning amendment application at
Reckson Executive Park from Sun Homes to the Planning Board.
3) Considering adopting local adjustments for Homestead and Non-Homestead
base proportions.
4) Considering the approval of minutes for the Village Board meetings held on
January 29, 2015 and February 10, 2015.
ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT
OLD BUSINESS
NEW BUSINESS
DISCUSSION ITEMS
8:15 P.M. (EST) - SPECIAL MEETING: Immediately following the regular meeting
of the Village Board, meeting as the Board of Police Commissioners, will convene in
executive session for the purpose of interviews for the position of Police Sergeant.
ACTION ON NON-AGENDA MATTERS SUBJECT TO THE CONSENT OF THE
TRUSTEES PRESENT AT THE MEETING
THE NEXT SPECIAL AND REGULAR TRUSTEES MEETINGS
March 10 and March 24, 2015
LOCAL LAW AMENDING
CHAPTERS 215, 2355 245 and A258 OF THE VILLAGE CODE
A LOCAL LAW to amend
Chapters 215, 235, 245 and A258
of the Village of Rye Brook Code
regarding the creation of a Village
Sustainability Committee.
BE IT ENACTED by the Board of Trustees of the Village of Rye Brook as follows:
Section 1. Chapter 235 of the Village Code, entitled Trees, is amended as follows:
§ 235-2 Definitions.
ADVISORY COUNCIL ON ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION
term An advisoi-� board consisting of appoi ted by the Board of Tfustees for 9:
ft1.. r.l"Fr „1
235 23 Advisory Counefl on Eiivironmental Conservation.
A, The
- - _
The Gottneil shall also ffiake feeoffiffiendations to the
b s.
be Board blandscaping
and othef
b40tlt its of wa�f and `
be owned `' b
days'B-0)-g-V4 as it deems appropfiate for the presefvation and replenishment of trees
B-. The Advisory Council on En-vironmenta4 Conset=vation shall meet at such times a
deems appropriate to acecomplish the pufposes of 5 235 -23. All such meetings shall
co efied on !0
notice. AU meetings of fhe Advisoff Council on En-vifonme
Conservation shall be open to the publie.-
b b
ethef
eopies-of all feeofnffieiqdatiw9s, besubed tothe Wlag
b b'
1313/08/48006911 1116115
Section 2. Article VI of Chapter A258 of the Village Code is hereby-adopted as follows:
S A258-15 Sustainability Committee.
A. Purpose. The Sustainability- Committee shall promote the consenTation of the
environment of the Village of Rye Brook by acting in an advisory capacity to the
Village Board of Trustees and by serving as liaison between the Board and the Rye
Brook community on conservation programs and initiatives undertaken by the Village
Board.
B. The Sustainability Committee shall:
make recommendations to the Village Board regarding the preservation and
replenishing of trees, woods and landscaping in the Village so as to minimize
undesirable environmental impacts and further beautify the Village in furtherance of
the health, safety and`welfare of present and future Village residents, and
make recommendations to the Village Board regarding proposed shade tree
planting, landscaping and other beautification projects to be performed by the Village
throughout its various rights-of-,vat% and Village-owned properties, and
educate the public on environmental issues selected by the Village Board, and
44 oversee sustainability initiatives undertaken by the Village Board.
C. The Sustainability Committee shall meet at such times as it deems appropriate to
accomplish its goals, objectives and duties. All such meetings shall be convened
on 10 days' notice and shall be open to the public.
D. All recommendations of the Sustainability Committee shall be by majority vote of the
whole Committee. Minutes of the meetings, together with copies of all
recommendations, shall be submitted to the Village Administrator/Clerk within 30
days following the meeting.
Section 3. The existing membership of the Advisory Committee on Environmental
Conservation as of the date of adoption of this local law is hereby appointed to serve as the
initial membership of the Sustainability Committee.
1313/08/48006911 1116115
-2-
Section 4. Chapter 215 of the Village Code, entitled Streets and Sidewalks, is amended as
follows:
§ 215-4 No construction permitted in public right-of-way.
A. No person or company may construct a structure within the public right-of-way, with
the exception of necessary work for the installation or maintenance of utilities,
including but not limited to cable television, gas services, electric services, telephone
services, installation of water mains, storm drains, sewers and appurtenances,
provided, however, that such person or company first receives a validly issued permit
from the Village of Rye Brook Building Department.
B. Underground vaults for telephone systems shall be considered an appurtenance
requiring a permit, and signposts with gauging stations for gas mains are also
appurtenances requiring a permit prior to installation.
C. No wall or fence may be constructed within the public right-of-way.
D. All applications for such permits shall include an erosion and sediment control plan
in accordance with Chapter 118, Erosion and Sediment Control, of this Code.
E. All applications for permits for work including excavation must demonstrate
compliance with the notification provisions of 16 NYCRR Part 753 regarding
protection of underground facilities.
F. Should the work to be performed in the public right-of-way result in the construction
or placement of a fixture, structure, pole, monitoring box or other appurtenance
which will remain in the right-of-way, upon submission of the permit application to
the Building Department the applicant must submit a plan to the
on Environmental Sustainability Committee, which will make a
recommendation as to whether there is adequate screening to form a natural
landscaping to shield the adjacent buildings and public from the proposed building or
structure or utility appurtenance.
G. Upon approval o€positive recommendation for any, plan by the Advisofy Council on
Envifon Al Com Sustainability Committee, the wee Building
Inspector will set an amount to be held in escrow to guarantee the work performed
and plantings to be included, pending completion of the work and approval by the
Building Inspector.
215-6 Deposit or bond.
A. The applicant and permittee shall deposit with the Building Inspector before
receiving a permit, a cash bond, in an amount set forth in the License and Permit Fee
1313/08/48006911 1116115
-3-
Schedule, to guarantee the work performed in the street or highway, including the
cost of replacing pavement and the restoration of the opening. The deposit shall be
returned after the Building Inspector approves the final restoration of the public
road, right-of-way, street or highway and the guaranty settlement of any pavement or
any violation of the specifications. In the event that the application or permittee does
not restore the street to the satisfaction of the Building Inspector, upon five days'
written notice or, in an emergency upon such notice as deemed practicable, the
Building Inspector shall have the right to perform the work the Building Inspector
deems required, utilizing the deposit to defray the costs thereof. In the event that the
costs arc greater than the amount deposited, the applicant or permittee shall be liable
for the balance.
B. For utility companies only, in lieu of a cash deposit, the utility, company may file a
bond with the Building Inspector, in an amount set forth in the License and Permit
Fee Schedule, to guarantee the restoration of the public road, right-of-way, street or
highway.
C. The Village Engineer may deny a street opening permit to any person or party failing
to obtain a positive recommendation from the
Consefvati Sustainability Committee demonstrating adequate screening of a
proposed structure or to restore a public road, right-of-way, street or highway in
accordance with this article or who shall owe the Village any sum of money under
this article to restore a public road, right-of-way, street or highway, subject to appeal
to the Board of Trustees.
215-5 Specifications for construction in right of way.
Construction within the right-of-way and the final restoration shall be performed in
accordance with Village standards and specifications approved by the Village Engineer,
which shall include the following minimum specifications:
A. Any, such application must include a positive recommendation from the Advisa�y
Council on Efl-vironmental CO Sustainability Committee and the
appropriate escrow set by the Building Inspector to ensure there is adequate
screening to form a natural landscaping to shield the adjacent buildings and public
from the proposed building or structure.
B. All work shall be performed in a good and workmanlike manner, satisfactory- to the
Village Engineer.
1313/08/48006911 1116115
-4-
Section 5. Chapter 245 of the Village Code, entitled Wetlands and Watercourses, is
amended as follows:
§ 245-3 Definitions.
ADVISORYCOUNCIL OENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION
The Ad-visofy Council on Gonsevv-fttion, as duly appointed by the V41htge
§ 245-5 General procedures for permits.
A. Procedure for permits when the Planning Board is the approval authority.
(1) Ten copies of the application for a permit shall be submitted to the approval
authority on forms furnished by the Village Clerk. Additional copies shall be provided
as required by the approval authority for distribution to advisory boards, councils,
commissions and consultants.
(2) An application shall not be deemed complete until and unless the applicant
has complied fully with the procedures of the State Environmental Quality Review
Act.
(3) The approval authority, upon receipt of an application which is complete and
meeting the application requirements of this chapter, may refer the application to the
o r--� E_.,nci C._ ..sev.—nion Sustainability Committee for
review and report. The AdyoiyCouncil of�rVr-F_~ ~--4#1— �
Sustainability Committee shall, upon a referral, report to the approval authority
within 30 days of the referral date or within such other longer period as may be
specified by the approval authority.
(4) Any, application for a wetlands permit shall be subject to the notification
requirements as set forth in � 250-40Editor's Note: See Ch. 250, Zoning. of the
Village Code.
(5) All information relating to a permit application, including but not limited to
the application itself, additional required materials or information, notices, record of
hearings, written comments and findings shall be maintained on file in the office of
the Village Clerk.
(6) The approval authority, its agents or employees may enter upon any lands or
waters for good cause shown for the purpose of undertaking any investigations,
examinations, surreys or other activity for the purposes of this chapter.
1313/08/48006911 1116115
-5-
(7) The approval authority may contract with qualified professionals, at the
expense of the applicant, to assist it in any aspect of the review of an application.
(8) A permit shall be issued after the approval of an application by the approval
authority. The date of issue shall be the date the permit is issued pursuant to the
approval of the application. All permits shall expire upon completion of the acts
permitted and, unless otherwise indicated, shall be valid for a period of one year from
the date of issue. An extension of an original permit may be granted upon written
request to the approval authority by the original permit holder or his/her legal agent
at least 90 days prior to the expiration date of the original permit. The time period for
a renewal may be waived for good cause show. The approval authority may require a
new hearing if, in its judgment, the original intent of the permit is altered or extended
by the renewal or if the applicant has failed to abide by the terms of the original
permit in any way. The request for renewal of a permit shall follow the same form
and procedure as the original application except that the approval authority shall have
the option of not holding a hearing if the original intent of the permit is not altered
or extended in any significant way. The standards for issuance of renewals shall be
the same as for the issuance of permits.
245-5 Standards for permit decisions.
A. In granting, denying or conditioning any permit, the approval authority shall consider
any report of the A°&v:. _- G_„~eil &R Sustainability
Committee. The approval authority shall also evaluate wetland functions and the role
of the wetland in the hydrologic and ecological system and shall determine the impact
of the proposed activity upon public health, safety and welfare, flora and fauna, rare
and endangered species, water quality and additional wetland functions listed in
245-1 of this chapter. In this determination, the approval authority, shall consider the
following factors:
245-11 Permit conditions.
A. Any, permit issued pursuant to this chapter may be issued with conditions. Such
conditions may be attached as the approval authority deems necessary, pursuant to 5
245-8 of this chapter, to ensure the preservation and protection of affected wetlands
and to ensure compliance with the policies and provisions of this chapter and the
provisions of the approval authority's rules and regulations, if any, adopted pursuant
to this chapter.
B. Every permit issued pursuant to this chapter shall be in written form and shall
contain the following conditions:
1313/08/48006911 1116115
-6-
(1) Work conducted under a permit shall be open to inspection at any time,
including weekends and holidays, by the approval authority, the
E..__:.0fif. e fit„' r-o flse. V aL: .. Sustainability Committee, the Village Engineer or their
designated representatives.
(2) All permits issued under this chapter shall be shall be void and of no effect
after one year from the date of issue thereof, unless the work for which the permit
was issued has been actually commenced and not been abandoned during that period.
In such cases, the applicant may reapply for a wetlands permit from the approval
authority in accordance with the provisions of this chapter. If the work for which the
permit was issued has commenced within one year from the date of issuance of the
permit, such permit may be renewed by the approval authority in accordance with the
renewal provisions set forth at § 245-5B(7) of this chapter.
(3) The permit holder shall provide written notification to the approval authority
of the date on which the regulated activity is to begin at least five business days in
advance of such date.
(4) The approval authority's permit shall be prominently displayed at the project
site during the undertaking of any, of the activities authorized by the permit.
(5) The boundaries of the regulated activity, and all wetlands and watercourses
shall be stated and appropriately marked in the field so as to make the boundaries
visible.
(6) The permit, including all conditions, shall be binding on all successors and
assignees of the permit holder.
Section 6. This local law shall become effective immediately, upon filing in the Office of the
Secretary of State.
1313/08/48006911 1116115
-7-
VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK,NY
ADVISORY COUNSEL, ON ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION
Dear Mayor and Village Board:
The Advisory Counsel on Environmental Conservation (the "ACEC"), by affirmative vote taken at its
regular public meeting held on October 2, 2014, hereby states and recommends the following to the
Mayor and the Village Board.
The ACEC notes that Plan Rye Brook: Village of Rye Brook Comprehensive Plan, adopted on June 2014,
2014, contains a recommendation that, "the Village establish a sustainability committee to educate the
public and oversee sustainability initiatives". We further note that the current mission of the ACEC, as
set out on the www.aebrook.org website reads as follows:
This committee promotes the conservation of the environment of the Village of Rye Brook by
acting in an advisory capacity to the Village Board of Trustees, and by serving as liaison between
the Board and the Rye Brook community on such matter as programs, areas, facilities, public
relations and other matters pertaining to conservation of the environment.
The ACEC sees considerable overlap between its current mission and the proposed mission of a
sustainability council. We believe that the ACEC's collective efforts and expertise are well suited to
undertake the functions of a sustainability committee and the ACEC would welcome the opportunity to
take on this important mission.
Consequently, the ACEC proposes: a) incorporating such sustainability efforts into the mission of the
ACEC; and b) re-naming the ACEC to include "sustainability" in its title (for example: Sustainability
Advisory Council).
We look forward to working with the Mayor and the Board to discuss this issue further and to help
specifically define the sustainability-related goals and duties of such a committee.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Since ly, -
Step Fischer, Chair
January , 2015
cc: David Bacchioni, ACEC
Mickey Marks, ACEC
Seth Schneider, ACEC
Michael Siegel,ACEC
Meg Veith-Heib, ACEC
Robin Willig, ACEC
FADan\Exceltec\Consents\OS Member's Unanimous Consent Final 3.21.02.doe
BR
O WCV VV�J�
19t}2
VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK
MAYOR 938 King Street, Rye Brook, N.Y. 10573 ADMINISTRATOR
Paul S. Rosenberg (914) 939-1121 Fax(914) 939-0242 Christopher J. Bradbury
www.ryebrook.org
TRUSTEES
Susan R. Epstein
David M. Heiser
Jason A. Klein
Jeffrey B. Rednick
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the Board of Trustees of the Village of Rye Brook
shall hold a public hearing on Tuesday, February 24, 2015 at 7:30pm, at Village Hall,
938 King Street, Rye Brook,New York to consider amending Chapters 215, 235, 245 and
A258 of the Village Code for the creation of a Sustainability Committee.
Christopher J. Bradbury
Village of Rye Brook, New York
LOCAL LAW AMENDING
CHAPTERS 215, 2355 245 and A258 OF THE VILLAGE CODE
A LOCAL LAW to amend
Chapters 215, 235, 245 and A258
of the Village of Rye Brook Code
regarding the creation of a Village
Sustainability Committee.
BE IT ENACTED by the Board of Trustees of the Village of Rye Brook as follows:
Section 1. Chapter 235 of the Village Code, entitled Trees, is amended as follows:
§ 235-2 Definitions.
ADVISORY COUNCIL ON ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION
term An advisoi-� board consisting of appoi ted by the Board of Tfustees for 9:
ft1.. r.l"Fr „1
235 23 Advisory Counefl on Eiivironmental Conservation.
A, The
- - _
The Gottneil shall also ffiake feeoffiffiendations to the
b s.
be Board blandscaping
and othef
b40tlt its of wa�f and `
be owned `' b
days'B-0)-g-V4 as it deems appropfiate for the presefvation and replenishment of trees
B-. The Advisory Council on En-vironmenta4 Conset=vation shall meet at such times a
deems appropriate to acecomplish the pufposes of 5 235 -23. All such meetings shall
co efied on !0
notice. AU meetings of fhe Advisoff Council on En-vifonme
Conservation shall be open to the publie.-
b b
ethef
eopies-of all feeofnffieiqdatiw9s, besubed tothe Wlag
b b'
1313/08/48006911 1116115
Section 2. Article VI of Chapter A258 of the Village Code is hereby-adopted as follows:
S A258-15 Sustainability Committee.
A. Purpose. The Sustainability- Committee shall promote the consenTation of the
environment of the Village of Rye Brook by acting in an advisory capacity to the
Village Board of Trustees and by serving as liaison between the Board and the Rye
Brook community on conservation programs and initiatives undertaken by the Village
Board.
B. The Sustainability Committee shall:
make recommendations to the Village Board regarding the preservation and
replenishing of trees, woods and landscaping in the Village so as to minimize
undesirable environmental impacts and further beautify the Village in furtherance of
the health, safety and`welfare of present and future Village residents, and
make recommendations to the Village Board regarding proposed shade tree
planting, landscaping and other beautification projects to be performed by the Village
throughout its various rights-of-,vat% and Village-owned properties, and
educate the public on environmental issues selected by the Village Board, and
44 oversee sustainability initiatives undertaken by the Village Board.
C. The Sustainability Committee shall meet at such times as it deems appropriate to
accomplish its goals, objectives and duties. All such meetings shall be convened
on 10 days' notice and shall be open to the public.
D. All recommendations of the Sustainability Committee shall be by majority vote of the
whole Committee. Minutes of the meetings, together with copies of all
recommendations, shall be submitted to the Village Administrator/Clerk within 30
days following the meeting.
Section 3. The existing membership of the Advisory Committee on Environmental
Conservation as of the date of adoption of this local law is hereby appointed to serve as the
initial membership of the Sustainability Committee.
1313/08/48006911 1116115
-2-
Section 4. Chapter 215 of the Village Code, entitled Streets and Sidewalks, is amended as
follows:
§ 215-4 No construction permitted in public right-of-way.
A. No person or company may construct a structure within the public right-of-way, with
the exception of necessary work for the installation or maintenance of utilities,
including but not limited to cable television, gas services, electric services, telephone
services, installation of water mains, storm drains, sewers and appurtenances,
provided, however, that such person or company first receives a validly issued permit
from the Village of Rye Brook Building Department.
B. Underground vaults for telephone systems shall be considered an appurtenance
requiring a permit, and signposts with gauging stations for gas mains are also
appurtenances requiring a permit prior to installation.
C. No wall or fence may be constructed within the public right-of-way.
D. All applications for such permits shall include an erosion and sediment control plan
in accordance with Chapter 118, Erosion and Sediment Control, of this Code.
E. All applications for permits for work including excavation must demonstrate
compliance with the notification provisions of 16 NYCRR Part 753 regarding
protection of underground facilities.
F. Should the work to be performed in the public right-of-way result in the construction
or placement of a fixture, structure, pole, monitoring box or other appurtenance
which will remain in the right-of-way, upon submission of the permit application to
the Building Department the applicant must submit a plan to the
on Environmental Sustainability Committee, which will make a
recommendation as to whether there is adequate screening to form a natural
landscaping to shield the adjacent buildings and public from the proposed building or
structure or utility appurtenance.
G. Upon approval o€positive recommendation for any, plan by the Advisofy Council on
Envifon Al Com Sustainability Committee, the wee Building
Inspector will set an amount to be held in escrow to guarantee the work performed
and plantings to be included, pending completion of the work and approval by the
Building Inspector.
215-6 Deposit or bond.
A. The applicant and permittee shall deposit with the Building Inspector before
receiving a permit, a cash bond, in an amount set forth in the License and Permit Fee
1313/08/48006911 1116115
-3-
Schedule, to guarantee the work performed in the street or highway, including the
cost of replacing pavement and the restoration of the opening. The deposit shall be
returned after the Building Inspector approves the final restoration of the public
road, right-of-way, street or highway and the guaranty settlement of any pavement or
any violation of the specifications. In the event that the application or permittee does
not restore the street to the satisfaction of the Building Inspector, upon five days'
written notice or, in an emergency upon such notice as deemed practicable, the
Building Inspector shall have the right to perform the work the Building Inspector
deems required, utilizing the deposit to defray the costs thereof. In the event that the
costs arc greater than the amount deposited, the applicant or permittee shall be liable
for the balance.
B. For utility companies only, in lieu of a cash deposit, the utility, company may file a
bond with the Building Inspector, in an amount set forth in the License and Permit
Fee Schedule, to guarantee the restoration of the public road, right-of-way, street or
highway.
C. The Village Engineer may deny a street opening permit to any person or party failing
to obtain a positive recommendation from the
Consefvati Sustainability Committee demonstrating adequate screening of a
proposed structure or to restore a public road, right-of-way, street or highway in
accordance with this article or who shall owe the Village any sum of money under
this article to restore a public road, right-of-way, street or highway, subject to appeal
to the Board of Trustees.
215-5 Specifications for construction in right of way.
Construction within the right-of-way and the final restoration shall be performed in
accordance with Village standards and specifications approved by the Village Engineer,
which shall include the following minimum specifications:
A. Any, such application must include a positive recommendation from the Advisa�y
Council on Efl-vironmental CO Sustainability Committee and the
appropriate escrow set by the Building Inspector to ensure there is adequate
screening to form a natural landscaping to shield the adjacent buildings and public
from the proposed building or structure.
B. All work shall be performed in a good and workmanlike manner, satisfactory- to the
Village Engineer.
1313/08/48006911 1116115
-4-
Section 5. Chapter 245 of the Village Code, entitled Wetlands and Watercourses, is
amended as follows:
§ 245-3 Definitions.
ADVISORYCOUNCIL OENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION
The Ad-visofy Council on Gonsevv-fttion, as duly appointed by the V41htge
§ 245-5 General procedures for permits.
A. Procedure for permits when the Planning Board is the approval authority.
(1) Ten copies of the application for a permit shall be submitted to the approval
authority on forms furnished by the Village Clerk. Additional copies shall be provided
as required by the approval authority for distribution to advisory boards, councils,
commissions and consultants.
(2) An application shall not be deemed complete until and unless the applicant
has complied fully with the procedures of the State Environmental Quality Review
Act.
(3) The approval authority, upon receipt of an application which is complete and
meeting the application requirements of this chapter, may refer the application to the
o r--� E_.,nci C._ ..sev.—nion Sustainability Committee for
review and report. The AdyoiyCouncil of�rVr-F_~ ~--4#1— �
Sustainability Committee shall, upon a referral, report to the approval authority
within 30 days of the referral date or within such other longer period as may be
specified by the approval authority.
(4) Any, application for a wetlands permit shall be subject to the notification
requirements as set forth in � 250-40Editor's Note: See Ch. 250, Zoning. of the
Village Code.
(5) All information relating to a permit application, including but not limited to
the application itself, additional required materials or information, notices, record of
hearings, written comments and findings shall be maintained on file in the office of
the Village Clerk.
(6) The approval authority, its agents or employees may enter upon any lands or
waters for good cause shown for the purpose of undertaking any investigations,
examinations, surreys or other activity for the purposes of this chapter.
1313/08/48006911 1116115
-5-
(7) The approval authority may contract with qualified professionals, at the
expense of the applicant, to assist it in any aspect of the review of an application.
(8) A permit shall be issued after the approval of an application by the approval
authority. The date of issue shall be the date the permit is issued pursuant to the
approval of the application. All permits shall expire upon completion of the acts
permitted and, unless otherwise indicated, shall be valid for a period of one year from
the date of issue. An extension of an original permit may be granted upon written
request to the approval authority by the original permit holder or his/her legal agent
at least 90 days prior to the expiration date of the original permit. The time period for
a renewal may be waived for good cause show. The approval authority may require a
new hearing if, in its judgment, the original intent of the permit is altered or extended
by the renewal or if the applicant has failed to abide by the terms of the original
permit in any way. The request for renewal of a permit shall follow the same form
and procedure as the original application except that the approval authority shall have
the option of not holding a hearing if the original intent of the permit is not altered
or extended in any significant way. The standards for issuance of renewals shall be
the same as for the issuance of permits.
245-5 Standards for permit decisions.
A. In granting, denying or conditioning any permit, the approval authority shall consider
any report of the A°&v:. _- G_„~eil &R Sustainability
Committee. The approval authority shall also evaluate wetland functions and the role
of the wetland in the hydrologic and ecological system and shall determine the impact
of the proposed activity upon public health, safety and welfare, flora and fauna, rare
and endangered species, water quality and additional wetland functions listed in
245-1 of this chapter. In this determination, the approval authority, shall consider the
following factors:
245-11 Permit conditions.
A. Any, permit issued pursuant to this chapter may be issued with conditions. Such
conditions may be attached as the approval authority deems necessary, pursuant to 5
245-8 of this chapter, to ensure the preservation and protection of affected wetlands
and to ensure compliance with the policies and provisions of this chapter and the
provisions of the approval authority's rules and regulations, if any, adopted pursuant
to this chapter.
B. Every permit issued pursuant to this chapter shall be in written form and shall
contain the following conditions:
1313/08/48006911 1116115
-6-
(1) Work conducted under a permit shall be open to inspection at any time,
including weekends and holidays, by the approval authority, the
E..__:.0fif. e fit„' r-o flse. V aL: .. Sustainability Committee, the Village Engineer or their
designated representatives.
(2) All permits issued under this chapter shall be shall be void and of no effect
after one year from the date of issue thereof, unless the work for which the permit
was issued has been actually commenced and not been abandoned during that period.
In such cases, the applicant may reapply for a wetlands permit from the approval
authority in accordance with the provisions of this chapter. If the work for which the
permit was issued has commenced within one year from the date of issuance of the
permit, such permit may be renewed by the approval authority in accordance with the
renewal provisions set forth at § 245-5B(7) of this chapter.
(3) The permit holder shall provide written notification to the approval authority
of the date on which the regulated activity is to begin at least five business days in
advance of such date.
(4) The approval authority's permit shall be prominently displayed at the project
site during the undertaking of any, of the activities authorized by the permit.
(5) The boundaries of the regulated activity, and all wetlands and watercourses
shall be stated and appropriately marked in the field so as to make the boundaries
visible.
(6) The permit, including all conditions, shall be binding on all successors and
assignees of the permit holder.
Section 6. This local law shall become effective immediately, upon filing in the Office of the
Secretary of State.
1313/08/48006911 1116115
-7-
VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK,NY
ADVISORY COUNSEL, ON ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION
Dear Mayor and Village Board:
The Advisory Counsel on Environmental Conservation (the "ACEC"), by affirmative vote taken at its
regular public meeting held on October 2, 2014, hereby states and recommends the following to the
Mayor and the Village Board.
The ACEC notes that Plan Rye Brook: Village of Rye Brook Comprehensive Plan, adopted on June 2014,
2014, contains a recommendation that, "the Village establish a sustainability committee to educate the
public and oversee sustainability initiatives". We further note that the current mission of the ACEC, as
set out on the www.aebrook.org website reads as follows:
This committee promotes the conservation of the environment of the Village of Rye Brook by
acting in an advisory capacity to the Village Board of Trustees, and by serving as liaison between
the Board and the Rye Brook community on such matter as programs, areas, facilities, public
relations and other matters pertaining to conservation of the environment.
The ACEC sees considerable overlap between its current mission and the proposed mission of a
sustainability council. We believe that the ACEC's collective efforts and expertise are well suited to
undertake the functions of a sustainability committee and the ACEC would welcome the opportunity to
take on this important mission.
Consequently, the ACEC proposes: a) incorporating such sustainability efforts into the mission of the
ACEC; and b) re-naming the ACEC to include "sustainability" in its title (for example: Sustainability
Advisory Council).
We look forward to working with the Mayor and the Board to discuss this issue further and to help
specifically define the sustainability-related goals and duties of such a committee.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Since ly, -
Step Fischer, Chair
January , 2015
cc: David Bacchioni, ACEC
Mickey Marks, ACEC
Seth Schneider, ACEC
Michael Siegel,ACEC
Meg Veith-Heib, ACEC
Robin Willig, ACEC
FADan\Exceltec\Consents\OS Member's Unanimous Consent Final 3.21.02.doe
BR
O WCV VV�J�
19t}2
VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK
MAYOR 938 King Street, Rye Brook, N.Y. 10573 ADMINISTRATOR
Paul S. Rosenberg (914) 939-1121 Fax(914) 939-0242 Christopher J. Bradbury
www.ryebrook.org
TRUSTEES
Susan R. Epstein
David M. Heiser
Jason A. Klein
Jeffrey B. Rednick
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the Board of Trustees of the Village of Rye Brook
shall hold a public hearing on Tuesday, February 24, 2015 at 7:30pm, at Village Hall,
938 King Street, Rye Brook,New York to consider amending Chapters 215, 235, 245 and
A258 of the Village Code for the creation of a Sustainability Committee.
Christopher J. Bradbury
Village of Rye Brook, New York
Village of Rye Brook,NY Page 1 of 1
Village of Rye Brook,NY
Friday,January 9,2075
Chapter 235. TREES
§ 2 3 5-2 3. Advisory Council on Environmental Conservation.
A. The Advisory Council on Environmental Conservation shall make recommendations to the Village
Board regarding the preservation and replenishing of trees,woods and landscaping in the Village so as
to minimize undesirable environmental impact and further beautify the Village in furtherance of the
health,safety and welfare of present and future Village residents.The Council shall also make
recommendations to the Village Board regarding proposed shade tree planting,landscaping and other
beautification projects to be performed by the Village throughout its various rights-of-way and
Village-owned properties,and such other recommendations to the Village Board as it deems
appropriate for the preservation and replenishment of trees throughout the Village.
B. The Advisory Council on Environmental Conservation shall meet at such times as it deems
appropriate to accomplish the purposes of§235-23.All such meetings shall be convened on io days'
notice.All meetings of the Advisory Council on Environmental Conservation shall be open to the
public.
C. All recommendations of the Advisory Council on Environmental Conservation shall be by majority
vote of the whole Council. Minutes of the meetings,together with copies of all recommendations,
shall be submitted to the Village Administrator/Clerk within a reasonable amount of time following the
meeting.
http://ccodc360.com/print/RYI 192?guid-13470141 1/9/2015
February- 24, 2015 R-2
RESOLUTION
REFERRING A SITE PLAN APPLICATION
AT RECKSON EXECUTIVE PARK FROM SUN HOMES
TO THE PLANNING BOARD FOR REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATION
WHEREAS, Buckingham Partners and Sun Homes (the "Applicant") as authorized
by Reckson Operating Partnership L.P., has submitted a residential site plan and a petition to
amend the current OB-1 zoning for Section 129.25, Block 1, Lot 1 located at 1100 King
Street, pursuant to Section 250-14 of the Village Code, and map the property in the Planned
Unit Development District; and,
WHEREAS, the petition and site plan application requests permission to develop
the property as a residential community of one hundred ten (110) dwellings of which ten
(10) would qualify as affordable housing; and,
WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees is the Approval Authority for this application in
accordance with Sections 209-1(A)(1)(b) and 250-7(E)(3) of the Village Code; and,
WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees, pursuant to the State Environmental Quality
Review Act (SEQRA), determines the proposed action to be an Unlisted Action pursuant to
SEQRA;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that pursuant to Section 209-3 of
the Village Code, the Board of Trustees hereby, refers the application to the Rye Brook
Planning Board for Report and Recommendation; and be it further
RESOLVED, the Village of Rye Brook Board of Trustees intends to be Lead
Agency for review of this application under SEQRA and authorizes the circulation of the
Notice of Intent to be Lead Agency to all of the involved agencies.
445 Hamilton Avenue,14th Floor
CUDDY& White Plains, New York 10601
�L� Tel 914.761.1300 Fax 914.761.5372
FEDE" www.cuddyfeder.com
February 10,2015
BY HAND
Hon. Paul S. Rosenberg, Mayor, and
Members of the Board of Trustees
Village of Rye Brook
938 King Street
Rye Brook,New York 10573
Re: Buckingham Partners/Sun Homes (Phase 3 Reckson Executive Park)
Petition Requesting Text Amendment to Zoning Ordinance and Application for
Re-Mapping of Premises into the Planned Unit Development District
(Premises: 1100 King Street; Section 129.25 Block 1, Lot 1)
Dear Mayor Rosenberg and Members of the Board of Trustees:
On behalf of Buckingham Partners and Sun Homes (collectively the"Applicant"),as authorized
by Reckson Operating Partnership, L.P, as owner,we respectfully submit this Petition to Amend
the Zoning Ordinance,pursuant to Section 250-14, and Application to map the Premises in the
Planned Unit Development District ("PUD") in accordance with Section 250-7.E. of the Zoning
Ordinance. This Petition and Application requests permission to develop the Premises as a
residential community of one hundred ten(I 10) dwellings of which ten (10) dwellings would
qualify as Affordable Housing that affirmatively furthers fair housing ("AFFH") as such terms
are set forth in the Stipulation and Order entered in the United States District Court for the
Southern District of New York in the case between the United States Department of Housing and
Urban Development and the County of Westchester(Index No. 06 Civ. 2860 (DLC)).The
Affordable Housing units would be marketed for sale to families in the eighty (80) percent of
Westchester median family income range.
Similar to the Applicant's award-winning Kensett development in Darien, Connecticut,the
Applicant seeks to create a new community of homes able to enjoy the special beauty of the
Premises and the benefits of living in this Village, including a convenient commute to New York
City and a well-regarded school district, The location of the Premises, design of the townhouses,
scale of the streetscape and sensitive landscaping will make this new Residential Community an
inviting place to live. We look forward to arranging a site visit for this Board and members of
the Planning Board to view the Applicant's Kensett development.
The proposed new Residential Community would be situated on approximately 31.56 acre (i.e.,
the Phase 3 parcel) of the Reckson Executive Park, which totals approximately 79.5 acres.' The
Premises are located on the westerly side of King Street and bounded on the west by Purchase
College of the State University of New York,on the north by BelleFair at Rye Brook, and onthe
Approximately 75.5 acres of the Reckson Executive Park is located in the Village of Rye Brook,with
approximately 3.5 acres thereof situated in the Town of Greenwich,Connecticut,and approximately 0.5 acres within
the Town/Village of Harrison,New York.
C&F:2640298.8
ATTORNEYS AT LAW White Plains Fishkill New York City Stamford
CUDDY&
FEDER"r
February 10, 2015
Page 2
south by Doral Greens at Arrowwood and the Arrowwood Conference Center. The Rye Brook
portion of the Premises, including Phase 3, is classified in the OB-1 (Campus/Office Building)
District in accordance with the Village's Zoning Ordinance.
The Phase 3 parcel has been approved for construction of a 280,000 square foot office building
with 1,120 parking spaces. The development and construction of the Phase 3 improvements have
not proceeded to completion, despite efforts by Reckson to secure major tenants to occupy the
proposed office building and alternative development concepts also have been proposed, but
withdrawn.2 Despite this fact, Reckson has invested significant monies and made meaningful
improvements to the Reckson Executive Park, including substantially completing the detention
and water quality basins, as well as planting of the basins and site earthwork on the Phase 3
parcel. Further, the Phase 3 parcel has access via International Drive at a signalized intersection
with King Street. It is respectfully submitted that the evaluation of potential traffic and other
environmental impacts for SEQRA purposes of the build-out of the proposed Residential
Community should be analyzed in comparison to the development of the Phase 3 parcel with the
280,000 square foot office building previously approved thereon.
Given the alternative opportunities for development of the Premises and the compatibility of
residential use of the site,we respectfully submit that it would be appropriate for the Village to
remap the Premises from the OB-1 (Campus/Office Building)District to the PUD District in
accordance with Section 250-7.E. The residential development of the site would be wholly
consistent with surrounding properties and would satisfy the purposes of the PUD District, as set
forth in Section 250-7.E.(1) of the Zoning Ordinance, as detailed below. The Zoning Ordinance
permits development of the Premises at a density of 6 units per acre, or more than 180 dwelling
units,whereas this proposal seeks approval of a total of 110 residential dwelling units as a
Planned Unit Development(PUD).
We respectfully submit that the Premises qualify for placement in the PUD (Planned Unit
Development) District, which action is governed by the Village Board. The PUD Overlay may be
applied to properties of at least 30 acres located north of the Hutchinson River Parkway. In the
PUD District,the density of development permitted is 9,000 square feet per acre, but no more
than 6 dwelling units per acre. As noted above, this proposed Residential Community would
have only half that density although we are asking the Village to amend the Zoning Ordinance to
permit additional floor area for Affordable Housing, attached garages and walk-out basements,
where Affordable Housing is provided at a rate of ten (10%) of the market-rate units.
2 A proposal to construct a private school(The Stanwich School)was withdrawn in 2002. Thereafter,major
corporate office tenants that were interested in occupying Phase 3 ultimately chose to move to Connecticut,rather
than Reckson Executive Park in Rye Brook. Most recently,a four-rink ice skating facility was proposed on a portion
of the Phase 3 property,but that proposal was withdrawn in 2013 following a lengthy review process and
considerable opposition.
C&F:2640298.8
CUDDY
FEDE LLP
February 10,2015
Page 3
While the PUD regulations require at least 150 feet of frontage on a State, County or major
Village road that requirement was earlier waived when the overall office park was subdivided in
June 17, 1986 by the Village Board of Rye Brool (a copy of the relevant Town of Rye
Resolution is attached). Further of interest is that the Affordable Housing requirements (i.e.,
approximately 1 per 10 units)that apply to residential development in the Village do not apply
to, among other things, subdivisions proposed in the OB-1 District."
The relevant provisions of the Rye Brook Code confirm that there is a two step process
(Conceptual & Detailed) for the mapping of the Premises in the PUD District with the Village
Board of Trustees being the principal agency involved in issuing any decisions. This Application
commences that process and we look forward to working with the Village to enable this new
Residential Community to become a part of the broader Rye Brook community.
PETITION TO AMEND ZONING ORDINANCE
This letter Petition asks to amend Section 250-7.E.(3) of the Zoning Ordinance to better enable
the Village Board to consider site specific characteristics of proposed PUD developments,
flexibly addressing issues related to terrain,parcel configuration and building design while
holding true to the need to conserve natural resources and to preserve open space,providing
benefits to the community over and above that which the underlying district would otherwise
provide, such as the previously approved 280,000 square foot office building. This letter Petition
also requests the Village to provide an incentive for including Affordable Housing within PUD
developments.
There are four specific design issues that require the Village Board's consideration and have
prompted this Petition to amend the Zoning Ordinance:
1. The waiver of a 100-foot"buffer setback otherwise required under the regulations,
which buffer needs to be reduced internal to the Reckson property line for better
design and function for the residential development. It should be noted that the
current provisions of the Code permit the Village Board, upon recommendation of the
Planning Board,to reduce the setback(down to 80 feet) or to increase such
requirements (up to 120 feet) as noted below. However,the Village Board also has
the latitude and legal authority to waive and reduce the buffer area beyond 20%
provided the rationale underlying the need for such setback has resulted in the impacts
being mitigated (as the Village Board may determine)."'
2. As noted above,the density of development per acre is"capped" at 9,000 square feet
of floor area and 6 units per acre. Since the Premises is not required to provide
Affordable Housing, but the Applicant nevertheless is willing to offer ten(10)units
thereof, we are asking the Village Board to amend the Zoning Ordinance so that the
Village Board could waive the 9,000 square foot limitation, if and when Affordable
C&F:2640298.8
CUDDY&
FEDER"r
February 10, 2015
Page 4
Housing is provided in an amount equivalent to, or greater than ten(10%) of the
market-rate units (the"Affordable Housing Incentive").
3. The definition of floor area in Rye Brook's Code includes attached garages,but
excludes detached garages (presumably to preclude the conversion into finished space
of attached garages in existing houses). So, attached garages, are subject to the 9,000
square foot floor area limitation per acre in the PUD District,yet detached garages are
not subject to such limitation. This diverse treatment encourages the construction of
detached garages,despite the fact that they increase impervious coverage and expand
the number of buildings needed to be provided in a development. To minimize site
coverage, the Affordable Housing Incentive would apply in this instance to permit the
Village Board to allow attached garages and to permit such additional floor area
(beyond the 9,000 square foot limit per acre).
4. The Zoning Ordinance also includes basements within the 9,000 square foot floor area
limitation, if they are walk-outs and result from grading of the site. Since the
development of the Premises contemplates mass grading of the site, this Petition
seeks to amend the Zoning Ordinance to permit the Village Board to allow walk-out
basements as additional floor area(beyond the 9,000 square foot limitation per acre),
the Affordable Housing Incentive also would address this situation.
5. The requirement for 150 feet of minimum frontage on a State or County road
previously was addressed by the Village Board when it approved the subdivision of
the Reckson Executive Park and determined that the Phase III parcel did not need
independent street frontage, as set forth in its Resolution adopted on June 17, 1986.
Accordingly, we are requesting confirmation that this PUD development would not
need to conform to the 150 foot requirement for such frontage and, as a result, the
Petition does not seek to modify the Zoning Ordinance to address that issue. A copy
of the June 17, 1986 Resolution is enclosed for your convenience.
For the reasons noted above,this Petition hereby requests that Section 250-7.E.(3) of the Zoning
Ordinance be amended to read as follows [proposed new text is underlined]:
(3) Authority. The Village Board shall be the municipal authority designated to grant
approval for rezoning to a PUD District, as well as the PUD concept plan, after
recommendation of the Planning Board. The Village Board shall retain the
jurisdiction to waive dimensional requirements of the Zoning Ordinance to allow
for flexibilfty of design in the site plan, including but not limited to:
(a) The Standards and requirements set forth in Section 250-7.E.(2)(d)rl]may
be waived to permit additional floor area to be developed in such PUD
development, beyond the 9,000 square foot limit, if the development
provides Affordable Housing equivalent to ten(10)percent in number of
C&F:2640298 9
C U D DYE.
FEDER"r
February 10, 2015
Page 5
the market-rate dwelling units in such development, provided that such
Affordable Housing is restricted for a fifty (50)year term consistent with
the Westchester County settlement and is marketed in accordance with the
terms of such settlement.
(b) The Buffer areas set forth in Section 250-7.E.(2)env be reduced where
the PUD development abuts commercial office improvements.
These proposed text revisions would allow for a more flexible approach to the design and
development of the proposed Residential Community on these Premises, but would also serve the
interests of the community by allowing the Village Board, with input from the Planning Board,to
recognize the unique characteristics of each site and allow the Village to balance the
requirements of the site, while meeting the purposes of the PUD District and encouraging
Affordable Housing to be developed through the Affordable Housing Incentive. A Zoning
Compliance Table for this proposed Residential Community(which notes the proposed
amendments to the Zoning Ordinance) is annexed hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit A.
THE PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
The new Residential Community will have Open Space surrounding it and yards for homeowners
within it, as well as a walking/jogging path available for all homeowners to enjoy. There will be
one hundred(100)market-rate,townhouse units, some of which will be detached and the balance
will be attached units of three together. The Residential Community is anticipated to be
completed within 4 to 5 years.
All market-rate units will have their own attached garage and some units may have the option of
finished walk-out basements. The market-rate units will range in size from approximately 2,300
to 3,300 square feet, not including the optional finished basement. There also will be a clubhouse
and swimming pool as part of the amenity package available to these homeowners for an
additional monthly fee.
Affordable Housing townhouses will be constructed consisting of ten(10%)percent of the
market-rate units, or ten(10) Affordable Housing townhouses situated within the Residential
Community,each with a detached garage. Of these ten Affordable Units, four(4)will be three
(3)bedroom units of approximately 1,500 square feet in size and six(6) will be two (2)bedroom
units of approximately 1,200 square feet in size.
In support of this Application, we respectfully enclose eighteen(18) sets of the following
documents detailing the design of the Residential Community and the potential impacts thereof
for environmental review by the Village:
1. Drawings prepared by Divney Tung Schwalbe, LLP, as follows:
a. "Illustrative Plan," dated February 9, 2015 (11x17);
C&F:2640298.8
C'1 �'UD D1� Y&
T
1 E D $�L g'LLP
February 10, 2015
Page 6
b. (SP-1.0) "Conceptual Site Plan,"dated February 9, 2015 (Scale: 1"=60') (24"06"
size); and
c. (SP-2.0) "Conceptual Grading& Utility Plan"'dated February 9, 2015 (Scale:
1"=60') (24"06" size).
2. Renderings and Floor Plans prepared by Bill McGuinness, architect, entitled as follows:
a. "Proposed Detached Homes - Reckson Phase III Site—Sun Homes" (Norwood
Unit) showing:
i. "Rear" and"Front;" and
ii. Floor Plans of Detached Homes of approximately 3,300 sq. ft. (25
Norwood Units of 100 homes); and
b. "Proposed Attached End Homes—Reckson Phase III Site— Sun Homes" (Chester
Unit) showing:
i. "Rear" and "Front;"and
ii. Floor Plans of attached end homes of approximately 2,800 sq. ft. (50
Chester Units of 100 homes); and
c. "Proposed Attached Interior Homes—Reckson Phase III Site—Sun Homes"
(Avon Unit) showing:
i. "Rear" and"Front;"and
ii. Floor Plans of approximately 2,350 sq. ft. (25 Avon Units of 100 homes);
and
d. "Proposed Affordable Homes—Reckson Phase III Site—Sun Homes" showing:
i. "Front Elevations"and"Rear Elevations;" and
ii. "Main Floor Plan"and"Upper Floor Plan" detailing the layout of the 10
Townhouse Units of approximately 1,400 sq. ft.
3. Survey prepared by Joseph R. Link entitled, "ALTA/ASCM Land Title Survey of
Property situate in the Village of Rye Brook, Town of Rye and the Town of Harrison,
Westchester County,New York,"dated March 23, 2002, last revised January 21, 2015.
4. A Full Environmental Assessment Form, including a supplemental Traffic Impact Study
and Report regarding Potential School Children Generation, all in compliance with
Article 8 of the New York State Environmental Conservation Law and the rules and
regulations promulgated thereunder at 6 N.Y.C.R.R. Part 617 (collectively "SEQRA"),
including the following supplemental reports:
a. "Traffic Impact Study for Sun Homes at Reckson Executive Park,Rye Brook,
Westchester County,New York,"dated January 14, 2015,prepared by Maser
Consulting P.A.; and
b. A Report prepared by Divney Tung Schwalbe, LLP entitled"School Aged
Children, Sun Homes, Rye Brook."
C&F:2640298.8
CUDDY&
FEDER"r
February 10, 2015
Page 7
5. Notarized Authorization of Reckson Operating Partnership, L.P., as owner of the
Premises, authorizing Applicant's submission and processing of this Petition and
Application.
6. Checks payable to the "Village of Rye Brook"for the following:3
a. PUD Application and Site Plan Fee of$17,825 ($575/acre @ 31 acres); and
b. An Escrow Deposit of$5,000.
COMPLIANCE WITH PUD PURPOSES
The Zoning Ordinance recognizes that this Residential Community is subject to the approval of
the Village Board in accordance with Section 250-7.E.thereof governing PUD Developments.
For your convenience,the relevant provisions of the Zoning Ordinance applicable to this use are
set forth below with information indicating this Application's compliance therewith:
Section 250-7.E.(l):
(a) To provide, where appropriate a mixture of single family residences, senior living
facilities, excluding nursing homes, townhouses, apartments and limited commercial,
retail and institutional uses,pus related accessory uses. For purposes of this§250-7E, a
nursing home shall have the same definition as "nursing home" as set forth in Title 10,
New York Codes, Rules and Regulations, Section 700.2.
The proposed Residential Community will be situated on an approximately 31.56
acre parcel of land, which in size and character is both compatible and in harmony
with Doral Greens at Arrowwood, the Arrowwood Conference Center,BelleFair
and the Reckson Executive Park. The site for the new Residential Community is
westerly of the existing office buildings and at a lower elevation than the nearest
residential buildings. The area around the new Residential Community will be
suitably landscaped.
(b) To provide flexibility of design by coordinating site plan, subdivision and zoning
review and other government regulations and review procedures.
The new Residential Community has been designed to fit within the area
previously designated for development of the 280,000 square foot office building
and 1,120 space parking lot,while substantially reducing the impervious coverage
of the Premises. The lower-scale of the residential units will permit landscaping
s While Applicant is submitting checks in payment for the requisite Application fees,it is understood that,subject to
authorization from Reckson,these Application fees instead will be deducted from the credit account that the Village
is holding for the benefit of Reckson in connection with a Real Estate Tax Refund,and in such event,the amount of
the enclosed checks would be refunded by the Village to the Applicant. In addition,though not included in the
summary of requisite fees presented herein,we respectfully submit that any other fees,n¢luding the Consultant
Review(Environmental)fee should also be drawn from the abovereferenced credit account.
C&F:2640298.8
CUDDY.
FEDER"r
February 10, 2015
Page 8
within the site and around its perimeter, including a walking/jogging path for
enjoyment of the residents. The stormwater management basins required for the
larger office development will be completed and utilized as additional buffer areas
benefiting the new residents.
(c) To conserve natural resources and to preserve open space.
The conversion of the use of the Premises from office to residential will allow for
more landscaping and open space than feasible previously. As noted,the homes
will have private areas accessible to them and the community will enjoy the
surrounding natural landscape and new planting areas to be created as part of the
development.
(d) To provide benefits to the community over and above that which the underlying
zoning district provides for, such as but not limited to increased recreational
opportunities and reduced traffic impact.
The compatibility of a new residential community between Belle Fair and Doral
Greens is inarguable and beneficial to the community, including a reduction in the
traffic impact compared to a 280,000 square foot office building, as detailed in the
accompanying Traffic Impact Study.
CONCLUSION
For the reasons set forth herein,we respectfully request that this Board initiate the formal review
of this Petition and Application by forwarding it to the Planning Board for its consideration and
report, as well as being forwarded to the Westchester County Planning Board and to both the
Town/Village of Harrison and the Town of Greenwich, Connecticut for their review and
comment. We also request that a Public Hearing be scheduled on this Application at your
earliest convenience.
We look forward to appearing before this Board to address any questions and thank you for your
consideration herein.
Respe ill
Wil 1 ,
WSN:yp
Enclosures
cc: Edward Beane, Esq.; Mr. Christopher Bradbury, Village Manager; Messrs. Robert Dale,
Bill McGuinness and Rudolf Hutter; Mr. John Barnes; Messrs. Gerhard M. Schwalbe and
Matthew Steinberg; Dr. John Collins; Mr. Ronald P. Rieman; and Ms. Norma Drummond
C&F:2640298.8
CUDDY&
FEDER"r
February 10, 2015
EXHIBIT A
SUN HOMES
RYE BROOK,NEW YORK
ZONING COMPLIANCE TABLE
SECTION"' ZONING REQUIREMENTS PUD PROPOSED
250-7E(2)
(b) Minimum Area 30 acres 31.5 acres
(c) Location
Frontage 150 it <150 ft
(d) Residential Use
[11 Maximum Density 9.000 st f acre >9,000 st i acre(3)
6 units I acre 3.6 units 1 acre
Maximum Height 30 it <_30 It
(e) Buffer Areas
Ill [a] Along property line abutting 150 a --
existing road
[b] Along property line abutting any 100 ft(Perimeter)
district 100 ft <100 R(Internal Campus)tot
(f) Open Space
[1] Private Common Space — Provided
[1] Public Space 10%torr fee 1n Fee in Lieu
260-6G[3] Ott Street Parking
Spaces Per Dwelling Unit(DU) 2 2 Garage Spaces per Unit
2 Spaces I Affordable Unit
Plus One Parking Space per DU 1 50 Spaces In Common Plus
200 Spaces in Driveways
{� Chapter 250(Zoning[of the Vrdlage of Rye Brook(October 2001).
m This requirement waived when the overall office park was subdivided in June 17,1986 by the Village Board of Rye Brook
m Applicant requesting Village Board to amend the Zoning Ordinance to permit Village Board to waive the 9.000 square foot
requirement if and when Affordable Housing is provided in an amouni equivafeni to,or greater than ten(109k)of the market-rate
units.
(4)Applicant requesting Village Board to amend the 100-foot buffer setback otherwise required under the regulations,which buffer
needs to be reduced internal to the Office Campus property fine for better design and function for the residential development.
'The Village Board of the Village of Rye Brook adopted a Resolution on June 17, 1986,which among other things,
stated:
. . .the Board of Trustees hereby waives the requirement that all lots have frontage on and direct access to
King Street,subject to a deed restriction or other covenant satisfactory to the Village Attorney assuring that
the uses and occupants of all lots in the Resubdivision will be provided with right of access between,in and
from King Street and each individual lot with the right to travel over adjacent lots as necessary and as
indicated on previously approved site plans."
The Village of Rye Brook's Code sets forth the affordable housing requirements at§219-27.1 entitled,"Required
affordable housing component'
A.AFFH Units,as defined in§250-26.1D,shall be provided as set forth in the table below when a
subdivision of a minimum of 11 lots is proposed.
C&F:2640298 8
CUDDY&
FEDER"r
February 10,2015
Page 10
Number of
Proposed Lots Required AFFH Units
11 to 20 1
21 to 30 2
31 to 40 3
41 to 50 4
Continuing in like increments
1 additional AFFH Unit shall be required for each additional increment of 10
lots or part thereof
B.The requirement to provide AFFH Units,as set forth above,shall not apply to the following:
(1)Subdivision applications submitted prior to the effective date of this provision.
(2)Subdivisions approved prior to the effective date of this provision,including any amendments
to an approved subdivision,whether such amendments are submittedprior to or after the effective
date of this provision.
(3)Subdivisions proposed in the following districts: OB-1,OB-2,OB-3,OB-S,C1-P,C-1 and H1.
C.The requirements set forth at§250-26.1F(3)(d)through and including 250-26.1M shall apply to any
subdivision with AFFH Units.
Section 250-7.E. Special supplementary Regulations
(e)Buffer areas.
[1]There shall be required a buffer area around the perimeter of the site totaling
no less than 25%of the total site.The buffer requirements may be increased or
decreased by a maximum of 20%of the computed buffer area by the Village
Board after the recommendation of the Planning Board,based upon health,
welfare and aesthetic considerations.The following shall be minimum standards
for buffer areas on the perimeter of the PUD site:
[a]No less than 150 feet along the property line abutting any existing
road.
[b]No less than 100 feet along the property line abutting any district.
[c]For projects incorporating senior living facilities,no less than 50
feet along the property line abutting any office development or
industrial development,including airport facilities,provided that there
is adequate landscaping as determined by the Village Board. [Added 9-
23-1997 by L.L.No.6-1997]
[d]Provided that adequate landscaping and other appropriate mitigation
measures are provided which, at the sole discretion of the Village
Board,satisfactorily mitigate potential visual impacts while preserving
the character of the surrounding area,the Village Board shall have the
authority to reduce the buffer in specific areas.
[Added 9-23-1997 by L.L.No.6-1997]
[2] Such buffer areas shall remain in common ownership and shall not be
disturbed,except for permanent entrances/exits utilizing minimum buffer space,
C&F:2640298 8
CUDDYE.
FEDERLLP
February 10, 2015
Page 11
signage,passive recreation,landscaping,roads and for the provision of utilities.
Parking within buffer areas shall be permitted subject to provision of adequate
screening and provided that such parking is bcated at least 100 feet from the
perimeter property line of the PUD site.Notwithstanding the foregoing,parking
located within a buffer area may be owned privately and need not be in common
ownership,and the lot on which such parking is located may extaid into the
buffer area up to a maximum of 50 feet.To the extent that parking is located
within a buffer area,such use of the buffer area shall be limited to a buffer area
abutting an existing road and shall not exceed 15%of the overall length of such
buffer area.
[Amended 9-23-1997 by L.L.No.6-1997]
C&F:2640298.8
000005
MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING HELD ON JUNE 17th, 1986 AT THE VILLAGE
OFFICE•AT 8P.M.
Present: Mayor Kabcenell, Trustees Nardi, Cresenzi, Zak
Attorney Kramer, Treasurer Cortese, Clerk Smith.
Absent: Trustee Meiskin
Minutes of•the meetings held May 27th and June 10th were accepted
as submitted.
•COMMUNICATION FROM RECREATION.
Tom Hroncich reported that we will be having our Birthday Run and
celebration• on June 21st. General Foods is our large sponsor and
contributes. $8,795 for the Run plus many other giveaways, the Hilton
provides several large birthday cakes, and Arrowwood will be providing
us with barbecued cold chicken for over 1200 people and London & Leeds
has given $2500.00 for the celebration.
PUBLIC HEARING — Subdivision Application of Phase II; Royal Executive
Park into two parcels to be known as Royal Executive Park I1(18.2 acres) and
Royal Executive Park III (31 acres).
Mayor Kabcenell read extracts from a Letter from the Rye Brook Assessor
stating that the property had been separated into two parcels for tax
purposes as a courtesy, however that is not final until the Board
takes the action to subdivide the property. This tax split made
no difference in taxes while the land was still undeveloped.
Our Consultants, Frederick P. Clarke Associates recommend approval
of the subdivision. Recreation fees requirements have been
fulfilled at the time of the original subdivision approval..
The jogging and fitness course which is half completed should be
completed and will be open to the public as agreed.
WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees of the Village of Rye Brook has
reviewed a proposed subdivision plat accompanying a subdivision
application dated 4/22/86 signed by Joel H. Sachs Esq., and
WHEREAS, said proposed subdivision is shown on a drawing or plat
entitled "Resubdivision Plan of Royal Executive Park in the Village
of Rye Brook and the Towns of Rye, New York, Harrison, New York,
Greenwich, Connecticut", Sheet 1 of 2, and
WHEREAS, a portion of said subdivision is also shown on an
accompanying map entitled "Easement Plan for Resubdivision Plan
of Royal Executive Park in the Village of Rye Brook and the Towns of
Rye, New York, Harrison, New York, Greenwich, Connecticut", scale
1" = 40', and
WHEREAS, the above maps are further identified as Sheets i and 2
of property designated in the Westchester County map files as Block
#7437, Sheets # 87 and 88, prepared by Edward J. Crothers, N.Y.L.S.
#41474, in the offices of J.A. Kirby Company, Civil Engineers and
Surveyors, Port Chester, New York, and
r
000001
3. The conditions and stipulations set Forth in the Royal Executive
Park Phase 1B Resolution of Site Plan Approval adopted on or
about 10/22/84, shall remain in full force and effect and shall
in no way be abrogated or diminished in force and effect by the
terms and conditions of this resolution of resubdivision approval.
4. Pursuant to Section 1..5 of the Land Subdivision Regulations,
because of the special circumstances of this particular rezoning
request, extraordinary hardship would result from the strict
compliance of the applicant with Section 5.1.4. — Frontage on
Improved Streets, the Board of Trustees hereby waives the require—
ment ghat: all. lots have frontage on and direct access to King
Street subject to a deed restriction or other covenant satisfactory
to the Village Attorney assuring that the uses and occupants of
all. Lots in the resubdivision will be provided with right of
access between, to and from King Street and each individual lot
with the right to travel over adjacent lots as necessary and as
indicated on previously approved site plans.
5. The requirement that jogging and fitness trails be maintained by
the owner in good condition, for public use.
6. Four complete sets of final prints bearing the signature of the
owner and applicant: and the Village Mayor shall be presented to
the Village Clerk and receipt received from the Clerk for same
prior to the issuance of any further site plan review or approval
or building permits for further development of the proposed lots.
7. The approved linen copy of the resubdivision plat shall be filed
with the County Clerk by the applicant. A certified copy of same
shall be presented to the Village Clerk for filing.
Trustee Nardi voting AYE
Trustee Cresenzi voting AYE
Trustee 'Zak voting AYE
Mayor Kabcenell voting AYE
Trustee Me:iskin ABSENT
Mayor Kabcenell asked that Recreation Superintendent Tom Hroncich put
an item in the next newsletter about the jogging and fitness course.
In response to a question from Resident Ken Heller regarding
responsibility for liability in case of accidents on the jogging and
fitness course, Mayor Kabcenell suggested that belonged to the owner,
— Attorney Joel Sachs thought that possibly the Village could be named
as an additional "Insured" in their policy. The Mayor asked that Mr.
Sachs work it out with the Village Attorney.
MOBIL OILCORPORATION — RIDGE/BOWMAN RECONSTRUCTION APPLICATION.
Mayor Kabcenell said that a proposal to redesign the gas station
has been submitted.
George Morrow reported that the proposal. is being reviewed by the
Building Department, and suggested it be reviewed by the Attorney, and
then sent to the Planning Board for recommendations and report.
Completed site plans are not yet ready, but they wanted to get the
process started.
Mayor Kabcenell suggested that the Architectural Board of: Review
make recommendations.
Trustee Nardi commented that there seemed to be plans to carry
sodas and other items in a walk—in cooler, and was concerned with
the size of it.
Trustee Cresenzi questioned the rear yard setback of 5 feet which was
proposed.
RECSSON OPERATING PARTNERSHIP,L.P.
420 LEXINGTON AVEI\7UE
NEw Yoxx,NY 10170
February 10,2015
BY EMAIL: wnullAcuddyfeder.com
William S.Null,Esq.
Cuddy&Feder LLP
445 Hamilton Avenue, 10 Floor
White Plains,New York 10601
RE: Premises: Reckson Executive Park,Phase III
Authorization of Sun Homes to File Petition/Application to: (a)Amend
Zoning Ordinance:and(b)Map the Premises in the PUD District
Dear Mr.Null,
We are the owner of premises known as Phase III of the Reckson Executive Park,Rye Brook,
New York(the"Premises"),which Premises consists of about approximately 31.56 acres of
land in the Reckson Executive Park("REP"), which REP totals approximately 79.5 acres.
This letter confirms that you are authorized to submit and process the Application detailed in
your letter dated February 10,2015 addressed to Hon. Paul S.Rosen,Mayor,and Members
of the Board of Trustees of the Village of Rye Brook(the"Application Letter"). Further,you
are authorized to seek Site Plan Approval for the development of the Premises for residential
purposes,as described in such Application Letter.
This letter is being delivered to you with the understanding that it will be submitted to the
Village of Rye Brook,among other governmental entities,when any Applications are filed.
Nevertheless,Reckson Operating Partnership LLC reserves the right to withdraw this
Authorization at any time and to direct you to withdraw any applications filed pursuant
thereto.
Very truly yours,
RECICRN O RA G PARTNERSHIP,L.P.
Byt
Its:
Cc:Mr.Robert Dale; and Mr.Bill McGuiness
Sworn to before me this 10th day
of February 2015
!A1,111- [Al P�e
NotaryPubl' IV
In Quem()oM
`rOwAug.ft g C&T.2671313.2
f
r
♦
IN.
a w �
iL
v
F. ^I DIA
a
� .. �? S '+"'`� �ill ���� I�•II'�I�,lii�lii�1
��I�,�I� IIID NI�1�11111 s
oMil iil hi Ir II��� X11 ���� ���� �•�� i�il` I �Ilil II H}111• 1
fill 111 �j�lw � ' ;i�i ��I- -r►� � �� � � II �� I ^ �� _ I lull ,�•�+.��^ti_•
•s„-
II�41 I�, w I�11 I t� � ♦ Y`r.
� � 'I� 111i � �I� ' �� �I 'a•o�•. :�rirr. ..i1rr. `�....
REAR
`�,,�, �' I °� III I��IIj /� _. . : . � -.•:.
• ••, FRONT
, a •
PROPOSED DETACHED H
• HOMES
PATIO
KITCHEN
FAMILY DRESSING MASTER
Eel RM
RM BEDROOM
DINING ¢�
RM �Y
i
DOUBLE BEDROOM BEDROOM
GARAGE
DEN
PROPOSED DETACHED HOMES (3300 sq. ft.; 25 of 100)
RECKSON PHASE III SITE - SUN HOMES
FRONT
REAR
ft
PROPOSED ATTACHED END HOMES
RECKSON PHASE III SITE - SUN HOMES
MASTER BEDROOM
BEDROOM -�
HEARTH
Rm
LOFT
DINING _
ROOM
DOUBLE
GARAGE
- -- BEDROOM
DEN
PROPOSED ATTACHED END HOMES (2800 sq. ft.; 50 of 100)
RECKSON PHASE III SITE - SUN HOMES
FRONT
EHY
REAR
PROPOSED ATTACHED INTERIOR HOMES
RECKSON PHASE III SITE - SUN HOMES
PATIO
DINING RM
MASTER
BEDROOM
LIVING RM
l�l
KITCHEN HOME LAUNDRY
OFFICE
,,j
41
DOUBLE
GARAGE
BEDROOM T BEDROOM
ENTRY
PROPOSED ATTACHED INTERIOR HOMES (2350 sq. ft.; 25 of 100)
RECKSON PHASE III SITE - SUN HOMES
FRONT ELEVATIONS
`J
F ?� � r— Vis: •n
REAR ELEVATIONS
PROPOSED AFFORDABLE HOMES
RECKSON PHASE III SITE - SUN HOMES
PATIO
MAIN UPPER
FLOOR FLOOR
PLAN DINING MASTERCA PLAN
BEDROOM
KITCHEN
W/D
M
LIVING BEDROOM BEDROOM
T ENTRY
f
t 20'-0"
� 1
PROPOSED AFFORDABLE HOMES (10 UNITS @ 1400 SQ FT)
RECKSON PHASE III SITE - SUN HOMES
Full Environmental Assessment Form
Part 1 -Project and Setting
Instructions for Completing Part 1
Part 1 is to be completed by the applicant or project sponsor. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding,
are subject to public review,and may be subject to further verification.
Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to
any item,please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information; indicate whether missing information does not exist,
or is not reasonably available to the sponsor;and,when possible,generally describe work or studies which would be necessary to
update or fully develop that information.
Applicants/sponsors must complete all items in Sections A&B. In Sections C,D&E,most items contain an initial question that
must be answered either"Yes"or"No". If the answer to the initial question is"Yes",complete the sub-questions that follow. If the
answer to the initial question is"No",proceed to the next question. Section F allows the project sponsor to identify and attach any
additional information. Section G requires the name and signature of the project sponsor to verify that the information contained in
Part lis accurate and complete.
A.Project and Sponsor Information.
Name of Action or Project:
Sun Homes Rye Brook(Phase 3 of Reckson Executive Park)
Project Location(describe,and attach a general location map):
1100 King Street, Rye Brook, NY(Section 129.25,Block 1,Lot 1)
Brief Description of Proposed Action(include purpose or need):
Application for text amendments to Section 250-7.E.(3)of the Zoning Ordinance,to map Project Site in the Planned Unit Development District(PUD),and
to develop one hundred ten(110)dwellings of which ten(10)dwellings would qualify as Affordable Housing that affirmatively furthers fair housing(AFFH)
on a 31.56 acre parcel(Phase 3)of the Reckson Executive Park. The Project Site(Phase 3 parcel)has been previously approved for construction of a
280,000 square foot office building with 1,120 parking spaces. The development and construction of the Phase 3 improvements have not proceeded.
Name of Applicant/Sponsor: Telephone:845-855-9400
Sun Homes,William McGuinness E-Mail:
bmcguinness@sunhomes.com
Address:3 Memorial Avenue
City/PO:Pawling State: NY Zip Code:12564
Project Contact(if not same as sponsor;give name and title/role): Telephone:
same as applicant
E-Mail:
Address:
City/PO: State: Zip Code:
Property Owner (if not same as sponsor): Telephone: 914-750-7200
Reckson Operating Partnership, L.P. E-Mail:
Address:
360 Hamilton Avenue
City/PO: White Plains State: NY Zip Code:10601
Page 1 of 13
B.Government Approvals
B.Government Approvals,Funding,or Sponsorship. ("Funding"includes grants,loans,tax relief,and any other forms of financial
assistance.)
Government Entity If Yes: Identify Agency and Approval(s) Application Date
Required (Actual or projected)
a Cit Geiaiieil -r,....., Bea a ®yes❑No Amend Zoning Ordinance; Re-Mapping Premises
or Village Board of Trustees
b.City,Towti ee Village ®Yes❑No Review and recommendations
Planning Board or Commission
c. City Council,Town or [JYesR]No
Village Zoning Board of Appeals
d. Other local agencies ®Yes❑No Building Department-Building Permits
e. County agencies ®Yes❑No Backflow prevention
f.Regional agencies ❑YesVINo
g. State agencies ®Yes❑No NYSDEC-SPDES Permit
h.Federal agencies ❑YesEZNo
i. Coastal Resources.
i. Is the project site within a Coastal Area,or the waterfront area of a Designated Inland Waterway? ❑YesONo
ii. Is the project site located in a community with an approved Local Waterfront Revitalization Program? ❑YesR]No
iii. Is the project site within a Coastal Erosion Hazard Area? ❑YesONo
C.Planning and Zoning
C.I.Planning and zoning actions.
Will administrative or legislative adoption,or amendment of a plan,local law,ordinance,rule or regulation be the ❑YesmNo
only approval(s)which must be granted to enable the proposed action to proceed?
• If Yes,complete sections C,F and G.
• If No,proceed to question C2 and complete all remaining sections and questions in Part 1
C.2.Adopted land use plans.
a.Do any municipally-adopted (city,town,village or county)comprehensive land use plan(s)include the site 5ZYeS❑No
where the proposed action would be located?
If Yes,does the comprehensive plan include specific recommendations for the site where the proposed action ❑Yes0No
would be located?
b.Is the site of the proposed action within any local or regional special planning district(for example: Greenway ❑YesiZNo
Brownfield Opportunity Area(BOA);designated State or Federal heritage area;watershed management plan;
or other?)
If Yes,identify the plan(s):
c. Is the proposed action located wholly or partially within an area listed in an adopted municipal open space plan, ❑YesoNo
or an adopted municipal farmland protection plan?
If Yes,identify the plan(s):
Page 2 of 13
C.3. Zoning
a. Is the site of the proposed action located in a municipality with an adopted zoning law or ordinance. 0 Yes❑No
If Yes,what is the zoning classification(s)including any applicable overlay district?
OB-1 (Campus/Office Building)
b. Is the use permitted or allowed by a special or conditional use permit? ®Yes❑No
c.Is a zoning change requested as part of the proposed action? ®Yes❑No
If Yes,
i. What is the proposed new zoning for the site? PUD-Planned Unity Development District
CA.Existing community services.
a.In what school district is the project site located?Blind Brook-Rye UFSD
b.What police or other public protection forces serve the project site?
Rye Brook
c.Which fire protection and emergency medical services serve the project site?
Port Chester Fire District
d.What parks serve the project site?
Harkness Park
D.Project Details
DA.Proposed and Potential Development
a.What is the general nature of the proposed action(e.g.,residential,industrial,commercial,recreational;if mixed,include all
components)? Residential
b. a. Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? 31 s acres
b. Total acreage to be physically disturbed? apprnx 27 acres
c. Total acreage(project site and any contiguous properties)owned
or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? 76.4 acres
c. Is the proposed action an expansion of an existing project or use'? ❑Yes®No
i. If Yes,what is the approximate percentage of the proposed expansion and identify the units(e.g.,acres,miles,housing units,
square feet)? % Units:
d. Is the proposed action a subdivision,or does it include a subdivision? ❑Yes®No
If Yes,
i. Purpose or type of subdivision?(e.g.,residential,industrial,commercial;if mixed,specify types)
ii. Is a cluster/conservation layout proposed? ❑Yes ONo
iii. Number of lots proposed?
iv. Minimum and maximum proposed lot sizes? Minimum Maximum
e.Will proposed action be constructed in multiple phases? ❑Yes®No
i. If No,anticipated period of construction: 48-60 months
ii. If Yes:
• Total number of phases anticipated
• Anticipated commencement date of phase 1 (including demolition) month year
• Anticipated completion date of final phase month year
• Generally describe connections or relationships among phases,including any contingencies where progress of one phase may
determine timing or duration of future phases:
Page 3 of 13
f.Does the project include new residential uses? ®Yes❑No
If Yes, show numbers of units proposed.
One Family Two Family Three Fatuity Multiple Familyf�or more
Initial Phase 110
At completion
of all phases
g.Does the proposed action include new non-residential construction(including expansions)? ®Yes❑No
If Yes, Proposed residential clubhouse
i. Total number of structures 1
ii. Dimensions(in feet)of largest proposed structure: 30 height; 32 width; and 60 length
iii. Approximate extent of building space to be heated or cooled: 9,snn square feet
h.Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that will result in the impoundment of any ®Yes❑No
liquids,such as creation of a water supply,reservoir,pond,lake,waste lagoon or other storage?
If Yes,
i. Purpose of the impoundment:Completion of two stormwater basins and several rain gardens
ii. If a water impoundment,the principal source of the water: ❑ Ground water❑✓ Surface water streams ❑Other specify:
iii. If other than water,identify the type of impounded/contained liquids and their source.
iv. Approximate size of the proposed impoundment. (ea)Volume: n_47g million gallons; surface area: n 41 acres
v. Dimensions of the proposed dam or impounding structure: s s height; loo length
vi. Construction method/materials for the proposed dam or impounding structure(e.g.,earth fill,rock,wood,concrete):
Impounding structures already exist of snil/earth fill_ Work includes reshaping andIn anting_
D.2. Project Operations
a.Does the proposed action include any excavation,mining,or dredging,during construction,operations,or both? ❑Yes❑✓No
(Not including general site preparation,grading or installation of utilities or foundations where all excavated
materials will remain onsite)
If Yes:
i.What is the purpose of the excavation or dredging?
ii. How much material(including rock,earth, sediments,etc.)is proposed to be removed from the site'?
• Volume(specify tons or cubic yards):
• Over what duration of time?
iii. Describe nature and characteristics of materials to be excavated or dredged,and plans to use,manage or dispose of them.
iv. Will there be onsite dewatering or processing of excavated materials? ❑Yes❑No
If yes,describe.
v. What is the total area to be dredged or excavated? acres
vi. What is the maximum area to be worked at any one time? acres
vii. What would be the maximum depth of excavation or dredging? feet
viii. Will the excavation require blasting? ❑Yes❑No
ix. Summarize site reclamation goals and plan:
b.Would the proposed action cause or result in alteration of,increase or decrease in size of,or encroachment QYes❑No
into any existing wetland,waterbody,shoreline,beach or adjacent area?
If Yes:
i. Identify the wetland or waterbody which would be affected(by name,water index number,wetland map number or geographic
description):Work previously approved to encroach into wetland adjacent area necessarV to complete the stormwater management systems.
Approximately 26,066 SF will be altered to complete grading and planing. Permit issued as part of previously approved 280,000 SF
oftice building.
Page 4 of 13
ii. Describe how the proposed action would affect that waterbody or wetland,e.g. excavation,fill,placement of structures,or
alteration of channels,banks and shorelines. Indicate extent of activities,alterations and additions in square feet or acres:
No wetland work proposed. Work includes completion of two water quality stormwater basins and one stormwater detention basin
originally constructed in the 1980s.
iii. Will proposed action cause or result in disturbance to bottom sediments? ❑Yes®No
If Yes,describe:
iv. Will proposed action cause or result in the destruction or removal of aquatic vegetation? ❑YesONo
If Yes:
• acres of aquatic vegetation proposed to be removed:
• expected acreage of aquatic vegetation remaining after project completion:
• purpose of proposed removal(e.g. beach clearing,invasive species control,boat access):
• proposed method of plant removal:
• if chemical/herbicide treatment will be used, specify product(s):
v. Describe any proposed reclamation/mitigation following disturbance:
The water quality and detention basin bottoms will be planted with both aquatic and semi-aquatic plants.
c.Will the proposed action use,or create a new demand for water? Eyes❑No
If Yes:
i. Total anticipated water usage/demand per day: approx.39,750 gallons/day
ii. Will the proposed action obtain water from an existing public water supply? Eyes❑No
If Yes:
• Name of district or service area: United Water Westchester
• Does the existing public water supply have capacity to serve the proposal? 0 Yes[--]No
• Is the project site in the existing district? 21 Yes❑No
• Is expansion of the district needed? ❑YesO No
• Do existing lines serve the project site? 21 Yes[--]No
iii. Will line extension within an existing district be necessary to supply the project? ❑Yes J?1No
If Yes:
• Describe extensions or capacity expansions proposed to serve this project:
• Source(s)of supply for the district:
iv. Is a new water supply district or service area proposed to be formed to serve the project site? ❑Yes®No
If,Yes:
• Applicant/sponsor for new district:
• Date application submitted or anticipated:
• Proposed source(s)of supply for new district:
v. If a public water supply will not be used,describe plans to provide water supply for the project:
vi.If water supply will be from wells(public or private),maximum pumping capacity: gallons/minute.
d.Will the proposed action generate liquid wastes'? O Yes❑No
If Yes:
i. Total anticipated liquid waste generation per day: approx.36,150 gallons/day
ii.Nature of liquid wastes to be generated(e.g., sanitary wastewater,industrial;if combination,describe all components and
approximate volumes or proportions of each): domestic sanitary wastewater
iii. Will the proposed action use any existing public wastewater treatment facilities? ®Yes❑No
If Yes:
• Name of wastewater treatment plant to be used: Blind Brook Wastewater Treatment Plant
• Name of district:
• Does the existing wastewater treatment plant have capacity to serve the project? ®Yes❑No
• Is the project site in the existing district? EYes❑No
• Is expansion of the district needed? ❑Yes ONo
Page 5 of 13
• Do existing sewer lines serve the project site? ®Yes❑No
• Will line extension within an existing district be necessary to serve the project? ❑Yes®No
If Yes:
• Describe extensions or capacity expansions proposed to serve this project:
iv. Will a new wastewater(sewage)treatment district be formed to serve the project site? ❑Yes®No
If Yes:
• Applicant/sponsor for new district:
• Date application submitted or anticipated:
v. T;• What is the receiving water for the wastewater discharge?
public facilities will not be used,describe plans to provide wastewater treatment for the project, including specifying proposed
receiving water(name and classification if surface discharge,or describe subsurface disposal plans):
vi. Describe any plans or designs to capture,recycle or reuse liquid waste:
c.Will the proposed action disturb more than one acre and create stormwater runoff,either from new point OYes❑No
sources(i.e.ditches,pipes, swales,curbs,gutters or other concentrated flows of stormwater)or non-point
source(i.e. sheet flow)during construction or post construction.'
If Yes:
i. How much impervious surface will the project create in relation to total size of project parcel?
392,040 Square feet or 9 acres(impervious surface)
1,372,140 Square feet or -11 .9 acres(parcel size)
ii. Describe types of new point sources.No new point sources since stormwater basins already exist. New development will connect to existing
basins.
iii. Where will the stormwater runoff be directed(i.e. on-site stormwater management facility/structures,adjacent properties,
groundwater,on-site surface water or off-site surface waters)?
Surface water to be connected to existing stormwater quality basins and central detention basin.
• If to surface waters,identify receiving water bodies or wetlands:
Blind Brook
• Will stormwater runoff flow to adjacent properties? [-I Yes®No
iv. Does proposed plan minimize impervious surfaces,use pervious materials or collect and re-use stormwater? ®Yes❑No
f. Does the proposed action include,or will it use on-site,one or more sources of air emissions,including fuel Eyes[-]NO
combustion,waste incineration,or other processes or operations?
If Yes,identify:
i. Mobile sources during project operations(e.g.,heavy equipment,fleet or delivery vehicles)
construction equipment
ii. Stationary sources during construction(e.g.,power generation, structural heating,batch plant, crushers)
Construction trailer to utilize natural gas or electric for heat and hot water.
iii. Stationary sources during operations(e.g.,process emissions,large boilers,electric generation)
Individual homes to utilize natural gas fired boilers for heat and hot water.
g.Will any air emission sources named in D.2.f(above),require a NY State Air Registration,Air Facility Permit, ❑Yes®No
or Federal Clean Air Act Title IV or Title V Permit?
If Yes:
i. Is the project site located in an Air quality non-attainment area? (Area routinely or periodically fails to meet ❑Yes❑No
ambient air quality standards for all or some parts of the year)
ii. In addition to emissions as calculated in the application,the project will generate:
• Tons/year(short tons)of Carbon Dioxide(CO2)
• Tons/year(short tons)of Nitrous Oxide(N2O)
• Tons/year(short tons)of Perfluorocarbons(PFCs)
• Tons/year(short tons)of Sulfur Hexafluoride(SF6)
• Tons/year(short tons)of Carbon Dioxide equivalent of Hydroflourocarbons(HFCs)
• Tons/year(short tons)of Hazardous Air Pollutants(HAPS)
Page 6 of 13
h.Will the proposed action generate or emit methane(including,but not limited to, sewage treatment plants, ❑YesONo
landfills,composting facilities)?
If Yes:
i. Estimate methane generation in tons/year(metric):
ii.Describe any methane capture,control or elimination measures included in project design(e.g.,combustion to generate heat or
electricity,flaring):
i.Will the proposed action result in the release of air pollutants from open-air operations or processes, such as ❑YesONo
quarry or landfill operations?
If Yes: Describe operations and nature of emissions(e.g.,diesel exhaust,rock particulates/dust):
j.Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels or generate substantial ❑YesONo
new demand for transportation facilities or services? See Traffic Impact Study
If Yes:
i. When is the peak traffic expected(Check all that apply): ❑Morning ❑Evening ❑Weekend
❑Randomly between hours of to
ii. For commercial activities only,projected number of semi-trailer truck trips/day:
iii. Parking spaces: Existing Proposed Net increase/decrease
iv. Does the proposed action include any shared use parking? ❑Yes❑No
v. If the proposed action includes any modification of existing roads,creation of new roads or change in existing access,describe:
vi. Are public/private transportation service(s)or facilities available within'/2 mile of the proposed site? ❑Yes❑No
vii Will the proposed action include access to public transportation or accommodations for use of hybrid,electric ❑Yes❑No
or other alternative fueled vehicles?
viii.Will the proposed action include plans for pedestrian or bicycle accommodations for connections to existing ❑Yes❑No
pedestrian or bicycle routes?
k.Will the proposed action(for commercial or industrial projects only)generate new or additional demand N/A ❑Yes❑No
for energy?
If Yes:
i. Estimate annual electricity demand during operation of the proposed action:
ii. Anticipated sources/suppliers of electricity for the project(e.g.,on-site combustion,on-site renewable,via grid/local utility,or
other):
iii. Will the proposed action require a new,or an upgrade to,an existing substation? ❑Yes❑No
1.Hours of operation. Answer all items which apply. In accordance with Rye Brook Village Code Sec 158-4
i. During Construction:* ii. During Operations:
• Monday-Friday: 8 am-6 pm • Monday-Friday: N/A
• Saturday: 9 am-4 pm a Saturday: N/A
• Sunday: none. a Sunday: N/A
• Holidays: none. aHolidays: N/A
Page 7 of 13
m.Will the proposed action produce noise that will exceed existing ambient noise levels during construction, 0 Yes❑No
operation,or both?
If yes:
i. Provide details including sources, time of day and duration:
Typical construction-related equipment,with duration limited to hours of operation in accordance with Village Code.
ii. Will proposed action remove existing natural barriers that could act as a noise barrier or screen? ❑Yes 0 N
Describe:
n.. Will the proposed action have outdoor lighting? ®Yes[-]NO
If yes:
i. Describe source(s), location(s),height of fixture(s),direction/aim,and proximity to nearest occupied structures:
Residential lighting fixtures. Lighting plan to be reviewed during site plan review process.
ii. Will proposed action remove existing natural barriers that could act as a light barrier or screen? ❑Yes 0No
Describe:
o. Does the proposed action have the potential to produce odors for more than one hour per day? ❑Yes 0No
If Yes,describe possible sources,potential frequency and duration of odor emissions,and proximity to nearest
occupied stiuctures:
p.Will the proposed action include any bulk storage of petroleum(combined capacity of over 1,100 gallons) ❑Yes ONO
or chemical products 185 gallons in above ground storage or any amount in underground storage?
If Yes:
i. Product(s)to be stored
ii. Volume(s) per unit time (e.g.,month,year)
iii. Generally describe proposed storage facilities:
q.Will the proposed action(commercial,industrial and recreational projects only)use pesticides(i.e.,herbicides, ❑Yes [-]No
insecticides)during construction or operation? N/A
If Yes:
i. Describe proposed treatment(s):
ii. Will the proposed action use Integrated Pest Management Practices? ❑ Yes ❑No
r.Will the proposed action(commercial or industrial projects only) involve or require the management or disposal ❑ Yes ❑No
of solid waste(excluding hazardous materials)? N/A
If Yes:
i. Describe any solid waste(s)to be generated during construction or operation of the facility:
• Construction: tons per (unit of time)
• Operation: tons per (unit of time)
ii. Describe any proposals for on-site minimization,recycling or reuse of materials to avoid disposal as solid waste:
• Construction:
• Operation:
iii. Proposed disposal methods/facilities for solid waste generated on-site:
• Construction:
• Operation:
Page 8 of 13
s.Does the proposed action include construction or modification of a solid waste management facility? ❑ Yes 0 No
If Yes:
i. Type of management or handling of waste proposed for the site(e.g.,recycling or transfer station,composting, landfill,or
other disposal activities):
ii. Anticipated rate of disposal/processing:
• Tons/month,if transfer or other non-combustion/thermal treatment,or
• Tons/hour,if combustion or thermal treatment
iii. If landfill,anticipated site life: years
t.Will proposed action at the site involve the commercial generation,treatment, storage,or disposal of hazardous ❑YesONo
waste?
If Yes:
i. Name(s)of all hazardous wastes or constituents to be generated,handled or managed at facility:
ii. Generally describe processes or activities involving hazardous wastes or constituents:
iii. Specify amount to be handled or generated tons/month
iv. Describe any proposals for on-site minimization,recycling or reuse of hazardous constituents:
v. Will any hazardous wastes be disposed at an existing offsite hazardous waste facility? ❑Yes❑No
If Yes:provide name and location of facility:
If No: describe proposed management of any hazardous wastes which will not be sent to a hazardous waste facility:
E.Site and Setting of Proposed Action
E.I.Land uses on and surrounding the project site
a.Existing land uses.
i. Check all uses that occur on,adjoining and near the project site.
❑ Urban ❑ Industrial 0 Commercial 0 Residential(suburban) ❑ Rural(non-farnn)
❑ Forest ❑ Agriculture ❑ Aquatic 0 Other(specify):institutional; private recreation(golf course)
ii. If mix of uses,generally describe:
b.Land uses and covertypes on the project site.
Land use or Current Acreage After Change
Covertype Acreage Project Completion (Acres+/-)
• Roads,buildings,and other paved or impervious
0.2 8.9 8.6
surfaces
• Forested 10.2 4 (6.6)
• Meadows,grasslands or brushlands(non- 14.6 0 (14.6)
agricultural,including abandoned agricultural)
• Agricultural
(includes active orchards,field,greenhouse etc.)
• Surface water features
0.5 0.5 0
(lakes,ponds,streams,rivers,etc.)
• Wetlands(freshwater or tidal)
• Non-vegetated(bare rock,earth or fill)
• Other
Describe:Landscape and Stormwater Basins 6 19 12.6
Page 9 of 13
c. Ts the project site presently used by members of the community for public recreation? ❑Yes❑No
i. If Yes: explain:
I Are there any facilities serving children,the elderly,people with disabilities(e.g.,schools,hospitals,licensed ®Yes❑No
day care centers,or group homes)within 1500 feet of the project site?
If Yes,
i. Identify Facilities:
Atria Rye Brook, 1200 King Street. Independent living facility. Located approximately 1,200 feet northeast of site.
e.Does the project site contain an existing dam? OYes❑No
If Yes:
i. Dimensions of the dam and impoundment:
• Dam height: 5.6 feet
• Dam length: 660 feet
• Surface area: 1.49 ac.(proposed)0.73 ac(existing) acres
• Volume impounded: 16.98 (proposed)gallaiis 0 acre-feet
ii. Dam's existing hazard classification:
iii. Provide date and summarize results of last inspection:
Dam is not regulated since dam height is less than 6 feet.
f Has the project site ever been used as a municipal,commercial or industrial solid waste management facility, ❑YcsRlNo
or does the project site adjoin property which is now,or was at one time,used as a solid waste management facility?
If Yes:
i. Has the facility been formally closed'? ❑Yes[—] No
• If yes,cite sources/documentation:
ii. Describe the location of the project site relative to the boundaries of the solid waste management facility:
iii. Describe any development constraints due to the prior solid waste activities:
g.Have hazardous wastes been generated,treated and/or disposed of at the site,or does the project site adjoin ❑Yes❑✓No
property which is now or was at one time used to commercially treat, store and/or dispose of hazardous waste?
If Yes:
i. Describe waste(s)handled and waste management activities,including approximate time when activities occurred:
h. Potential contamination history. Has there been a reported spill at the proposed project site,or have any 0Yes❑ No
remedial actions been conducted at or adjacent to the proposed site?
If Yes:
i. Ts any portion of the site listed on the NYSDEC Spills Tncidents database or Environmental Site Eyes❑No
Remediation database? Check all that apply:
0 Yes—Spills Incidents database Provide DEC ID number(s): see attached list, none on project parcel
❑ Yes—Environmental Site Remediation database Provide DEC TD number(s):
❑ Neither database
ii. If site has been subject of RCRA corrective activities,describe control measures:
iii. Is the project within 2000 feet of any site in the NYSDEC Environmental Site Remediation database? ❑Yes❑✓No
If yes,provide DEC ID number(s):
iv. Tf yes to(i), (ii)or(iii)above,describe current status of site(s):
See attached list
Page 10 of 13
v. Is the project site subject to an institutional control limiting property uses? ❑YeSONo
• If yes,DEC site ID number:
• Describe the type of institutional control (e.g.,deed restriction or easement):
• Describe any use limitations:
• Describe any engineering controls:
• Will the project affect the institutional or engineering controls in place? ❑Yes❑No
• Explain:
E.2. Natural Resources On or Near Project Site
a.What is the average depth to bedrock on the project site? >5 feet
b. Are there bedrock outcroppings on the project site? ❑YesONo
If Yes,what proportion of the site is comprised of bedrock outcroppings? %
c.Predominant soil type(s)present on project site: Woodbridge loam(WdB,WdC) 52 %
Paxton fine sandy loam(PnQ 21 %
Ridgebury loam(RdB) 17 %
d.What is the average depth to the water table on the project site? Average: 0-5 feet
e. Drainage status of project site soils:0 Well Drained: 17%of site
0 Moderately Well Drained: 75%of site
O Poorly Drained 8%of site
f.Approximate proportion of proposed action site with slopes: 0 0-10%: 7p_%of site
0 10-15%: 8 %of site
0 15%or greater: 99 %of site
g. Are there any unique geologic features on the project site? ❑YesONo
If Yes,describe:
h. Surface water features.
i. Does any portion of the project site contain wetlands or other waterbodies(including streams,rivers, OYcs❑No
ponds or lakes)?
ii. Do any wetlands or other waterbodies adjoin the project site'? OYcs❑No
If Yes to either i or ii,continue. If No, skip to E.2.i.
iii. Are any of the wetlands or waterbodies within or adjoining the project site regulated by any federal, OYes❑No
state or local agency?
iv. For each identified regulated wetland and waterbody on the project site,provide the following information:
• Streams: Name 935-95 Classification C
• Lakes or Ponds: Name Classification
• Wetlands: Name Federal Waters, Federal Waters, Federal Waters,... Approximate Size NYS Wetland 18.6 ac
• Wetland No. (if regulated by DEC) G-3
v. Are any of the above water bodies listed in the most recent compilation of NYS water quality-impaired Oyes❑No
waterbodies?
If yes, name of impaired water body/bodies and basis for listing as impaired:
Name-Pollutants-Uses:Blind Brook, Upper,and tribs—Silt/Sediment—Aquatic Life
i. Is the project site in a designated Floodway? OYes❑No
j. Is the project site in the 100 year Floodplain? OYcs❑No
k.Is the project site in the 500 year Floodplain? Oyes❑No
1. Is the project site located over,or immediately adjoining,a primary, principal or sole source aquifer? ❑Yes 0No
If Yes:
i.Name of aquifer:
Q
Page 11 of 13
in. Identify the predominant wildlife species that occupy or use the project site:
n.Does the project site contain a designated significant natural community? ❑Yes✓❑No
If Yes:
i. Describe the habitat/cominunity(composition,function,and basis for designation):
ii. Source(s)of description or evaluation:
iii. Extent of community/habitat:
• Currently: acres
• Following completion of project as proposed: acres
• Gain or loss(indicate+or-): acres
o.Does project site contain any species of plant or animal that is listed by the federal government or NYS as ❑✓ Yes❑No
endangered or threatened,or does it contain any areas identified as habitat for an endangered or threatened species?
The EAF Mapper identified a species that may be endangered or threatened within the site's vicinity. A request has been made to NYSDEC to determine
the species,however no habitat has been previously identified for endangered or threatened species during previous environmental review of this Site.
p. Does the project site contain any species of plant or animal that is listed by NYS as rare,or as a species of ❑Yes❑✓No
special concern?
q.Is the project site or adjoining area currently used for hunting,trapping,fishing or shell fishing? ❑Yes❑✓No
If yes,give a brief description of how the proposed action may affect that use:
EA Designated Public Resources On or Near Project Site
a. Is the project site,or any portion of it,located in a designated agricultural district certified pursuant to ❑Yes❑�/No
Agriculture and Markets Law,Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304?
If Yes, provide county plus district name/number:
b.Are agricultural lands consisting of highly productive soils present? ❑Yes❑✓No
i. If Yes: acreage(s)on project site?
ii. Source(s)of soil rating(s):
c. Does the project site contain all or part of,or is it substantially contiguous to,a registered National ❑Yes❑✓No
Natural Landmark?
If Yes:
i. Nature of the natural landmark: ❑Biological Community ❑ Geological Feature
ii. Provide brief description of landmark,including values behind designation and approximate size/extent:
I Is the project site located in or does it adjoin a state listed Critical Environmental Area? ❑✓Yes❑No
If Yes:
i. CEA name: Airport 60 Ldn Noise Contour
ii. Basis for designation: Exceptional or unique character
iii. Designating agency and date: Date:1-31-90,Ag ency:Westchester County
Page 12 of 13
e. Does the project site contain,or is it substantially contiguous to,a building,archaeological site,or district ❑YesO No
which is listed on,or has been nominated by the NYS Board of Historic Preservation for inclusion on,the
State or National Register of Historic Places?
If Yes:
i.Nature of historic/archaeological resource: ❑Archaeological Site ❑Historic Building or District
ii. Name:
iii. Brief description of attributes on which listing is based:
f Is the project site,or any portion of it,located in or adjacent to an area designated as sensitive for ❑Yes ONo
archaeological sites on the NY State Historic Preservation Office(SHPO)archaeological site inventory?
g.Have additional archaeological or historic site(s)or resources been identified on the project site? ❑Yes ONo
If Yes:
i.Describe possible resourcc(s):
ii. Basis for identification:
h.Is the project site within fives miles of any officially designated and publicly accessible federal, state,or local ❑Yes ONo
scenic or aesthetic resource?
If Yes:
i. Identify resource:
ii. Nature of,or basis for,designation(e.g.,established highway overlook, state or local park, state historic trail or scenic byway,
etc.):
iii. Distance between project and resource: miles.
i. Is the project site located within a designated river corridor under the Wild, Scenic and Recreational Rivers ❑YesONo
Program 6 NYCRR 666?
If Yes:
i. Identify the name of the river and its designation:
ii. Is the activity consistent with development restrictions contained in 6NYCRR Part 666? ❑Yes❑No
F.Additional Information
Attach any additional information which may be needed to clarify your project.
If you have identified any adverse impacts which could be associated with your proposal,please describe those impacts plus any
measures which you propose to avoid or minimize them.
G. Verification
I certify that the information provided is true to the best of my knowledge.
Applicant/Sponsor Name Sun Homes Date
Partner,Divney Tung Schwalbe, LLP
Signature Title Planning and Engineering Consultant
PRINT FORM Page 13 of 13
EAF Mapper Summary Report Thursday, January 15, 2015 8:19 AM
Disclaimer: The EAF Mapper is a screening tool intended to assist
f project sponsors and reviewing agencies in preparing an environmental
assessment form(EAF).Not all questions asked in the EAF are
answered by the EAF Mapper.Additional information on any EAF
# question can be obtained by consulting the EAF Workbooks. Although
the EAF Mapper provides the most up-to-date digital data available to
a_ DEC,you may also need to contact local or other data sources in order
,•' to obtain data not provided by the Mapper.Digital data is not a
* `• �y substitute for agency determinations.
1 _
C7tlar n hlonlreil
•
� t�l�h-�•� A,;cn�.
t4 Toronto H
+ _ RochrrVv-
O Concord
i1a eke IF opt Bullbin Albany Bvitolr
pro:J4ncr
Crev443 n d
YM
mbuM nterrmup-
Halrilbuig.F { Orp.!PtaN•
OL .'lashing" €5�4 JbF;pn, r.11<Tl_Fyri ChirB
B.i.i [Coastal or Waterfront Area] No
B.i.ii [Local Waterfront Revitalization Area] No
C.2.b. [Special Planning District] Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF
Workbook.
E.1.h [DEC Spills or Remediation Site - Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF
Potential Contamination History] Workbook.
E.1.h.i [DEC Spills or Remediation Site - Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF
Listed] Workbook.
E.1.h.i [DEC Spills or Remediation Site - Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF
Environmental Site Remediation Database] Workbook.
E.1.h.iii [Within 2,000' of DEC Remediation No
Site]
E.2.g [Unique Geologic Features] No
E.2.h.i [Surface Water Features] Yes
E.2.h.ii [Surface Water Features] Yes
E.2.h.iii [Surface Water Features] Yes - Digital mapping information on local and federal wetlands and
waterbodies is known to be incomplete. Refer to EAF Workbook.
E.2.h.iv [Surface Water Features-Stream 935-95
Name]
E.2.h.iv [Surface Water Features-Stream C
Classification]
E.2.h.iv [Surface Water Features-Wetlands Federal Waters, NYS Wetland
Name]
E.2.h.iv [Surface Water Features-Wetlands NYS Wetland (in acres):18.6
Size]
E.2.h.iv [Surface Water Features- DEC G-3
Wetlands Number]
E.2.h.v [Impaired Water Bodies] Yes
Full Environmental Assessment Form - EAF Mapper Summary Report 1
E.2.h.v [Impaired Water Bodies - Name and Name - Pollutants - Uses:Blind Brook, Upper, and tribs—Silt/Sediment—
Basis for Listing] Aquatic Life
E.2.i. [Floodway] Yes
E.2.j. [100 Year Floodplain] Yes
E.2.k. [500 Year Floodplain] Yes
E.2.1. [Aquifers] No
E.2.n. [Natural Communities] No
E.2.o. [Endangered or Threatened Species] Yes
E.2.p. [Rare Plants or Animals] No
E.3.a. [Agricultural District] No
E.3.c. [National Natural Landmark] No
E.3.d [Critical Environmental Area] Yes
E.3.d [Critical Environmental Area- Name] Airport 60 Ldn Noise Contour
E.3.d.ii [Critical Environmental Area- Exceptional or unique character
Reason]
E.3.d.iii [Critical Environmental Area— Date Date:1-31-90, Agency:Westchester County
and Agency]
E.3.e. [National Register of Historic Places] Digital mapping data are not available or are incomplete. Refer to EAF
Workbook.
E.3.f. [Archeological Sites] No
E.3.i. [Designated River Corridor] No
Full Environmental Assessment Form - EAF Mapper Summary Report 2
Sun Homes
Full Environmental Assessment Form
Question E.l.h.i.
NYSDEC Spill Incidents Database Search
Spill Number Date Spill Reported Spill Naine County City/Town Address Status
1 610148 12/6/2006 RECKSON/COMMERICAL BUIL WESTCHESTER RYE BROOD 1100 DING ST Closed 12/12/07
2 807179 9/25/2008 RECKSON EXECUTIVE PARK BLDG 4 WESTCHESTER RYE BROOK 1100 KING ST Closed 01/07/09
3 1012529 3/16/2011 RECKSON WESTCHESTER RYE BROOK 1100 KING ST Closed 10/25/11
41 1112661 2/2/2012 VERTZON/MCI BUILDING WESTCHESTER RYE BROOK 1100 KING ST Closed 08/21/12
5 1112975 2/13/2012 RECKSON EXECUTIVE PARK BLDG I WESTCHESTER RYE BROOK 1100 KING ST Closed 07/24/12
6 1114239 3/22/2012 BUILDING 1 WESTCHESTER RYE BROOK 1100 KING ST Closed 04/06/12
7 1200040 4/3/2012 VERIZON FACILTY WESTCHESTER RYE BROOK 1100 KING ST Closed 04/03/12
8 1305320 8/16/2013 1 RECKSON OFFICE PARK WESTCHESTER I RYE BROOK 1100 KING ST Closed 09/19/13
9 1407528 10/21/2014 BLD 6 WESTCHESTER IRYE BROOK 11100 KING ST Pending
Divney Tung Schwalbe, LLP J. Michael Divney, P.E.,AICP, LEE❑AP
❑IVNEY ' TUNG • SCHWALBE One North Broadway Andrew V.Tung,ASLA, Esq., LEE DAP
Intelligent Land Use White Plains, NY 10501 Gerhard M.Schwalbe, P.E.
P:914.428.0010 William J.Carey,Jr.
F:914.428.0017 Mark S.Gratz, P.E.
www.divneytungschwalbe.com Lisa L. Baker,AICP,ASLA
Maria A.Copl it, P.E.
Donna M. Maiello,ASLA
SCHOOL-AGED CHILDREN
SUN HOMES RYE BROOK
The following analysis provides the potential number of public school-aged children that could be
generated by the proposed Sun Homes Rye Brook residential community.
Rutgers University's Center for Urban Policy Research released a publication entitled"Residential
Demographic Multipliers: Estimates of Occupants of New Housing" (New Brunswick,New Jersey,
June 2006) ("Rutgers Study")'which included a report for the State of New Fork. The report
provides multipliers for the total number of people per dwelling unit by age, the total number of
school-aged children (SAC), and the total number of public school-aged children (PSAC) for new
housing units. Each of these multipliers is provided based upon the type of housing unit (e.g. detached
single-family, attached single-family, multifamily), the number of bedrooms, and the value of the
housing unit arrayed in thirds (top-third, middle-third, and lower-third of value).
Table 1 presents the multipliers for PSAC for each proposed housing unit type and bedroom count in
the proposed project. For each housing type, the multiplier for the appropriate value (Rutgers Stud)T,
Table 3--2). Based on this analysis, it is anticipated that the proposed residential community would
generate approximately 39 public school-aged children.
Table 1 - New York School-Age Children (Public School Only)'
Multiplier for
Type of Unit Number of Units School-Aged Total School-
Children per Aged Children
Unit
2-4 Units, 2 Bedroom
Value of More than $132,000 6 0.36 2.2
2-4 Units, 3 Bedroom
Value of More than $213,500 4 0.62 2.5
Single-Family Attached, 3 Bedroom
Value of More than $269,500 75 0.28 21.0
Single-Family Detached, 3 Bedroom
Value of More than $194,500 25 0.50 12.5
Total 110 -- 38.1
Total public school-aged children
(rounded) -- -- 39.0
A copy of the Rutgers Study s New York multipliers tables are attached to this analysis.
'Residential Demographic Multipliers. Center for Urban Policy Research, Rutgers University. Table 3--1 New
York, School Age Children in Public School (PSAC). June 2006.
❑1VNEY * TUNG + SCHWALBE
Intelligent Land Use
The Rutgers Study indicates that 73% of all school-aged children would be anticipated to be public
school-aged children, as opposed to children enrolled in private schools. Based on the U.S. Census
Bureau's American Cornmunity Survey the Blind Brook School District had a public school
enrollment of 92% of total school-aged children. Table 2 presents the multipliers for all school-aged
children (SAC) and provides an estimate of the public school-aged children after adjusting for the Blind
Brook School District's ratio of public to private enrolled students (92%). Based on this analysis, it is
anticipated that the proposed residential community would generate approximately 46 public school-
aged children.
Table 2 - School-Age Children (Adjusted Public School Children based on Blind Brook
School District)4
Multiplier for
Type of Unit Number of Units School-Aged Total School-
Children per Aged Children
Unit
2-4 Units, 2 Bedroom
Value of More than $132,000 6 0.45 2.7
2-4 Units, 3 Bedroom
Value of More than $213,500 4 0.83 3.3
Single-Family Attached, 3 Bedroom
Value of More than $269,500 75 0.39 29.3
Single-Family Detached, 3 Bedroom
Value of More than $269,500 25 0.58 14.5
Total (Public &Private) 110 -- 49.8
Total public school-aged children
(Adjusted based on Blind Brook
School District ratio) -- -- 46.0
Based on U.S. Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS) 2008-2012 the Blind Brook
School District had approximately 2,298 occupied housing units'with an estimated 1,497 students
'U.S. Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS) 2008-2012 Blind Brook School District contained
1,440 school-aged children with 1,330 public school children. This equates to a public school enrollment for the
Blind Brook School District of 92% of the total enrolled children. Comparatively, the Rutgers Center for Urban
Policy Research indicates that 73%public school children are projected when compared to total school aged
children (Table 2--1, Public and Private). ACS data obtained from National Centers for Education Statistics'
School District Demographic System. http://nces.cd.gov/suneys/sdds/index.aspx.
4 Residential Demographic Multipliers. Center for Urban Policy Research, Rutgers University. Table 2--1 New
York, School Age Children (SAC). June 2006.
' Based on U.S. Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS) 2008-2012 the Blind Brook School
District contained 2,298 occupied housing units.
2
❑1VNEY * TUNG + SCHWALBE
Intelligent Land Use
enrolled for the 2014-2015 school year',which equates to approximately 0.65 students per occupied
housing unit. Based on this ratio, it is conservatively estimated that the number of public school-aged
children generated by the proposed community could be approximately 72.
e Blind Brook-Rye USFSD 2014-2015 K-12 enrollment was estimated at 1,497, per Adopted Burl�et 2014-2075.
J
Rutgers University, Center for Urban Policy Research
Residential Demographic Multipliers
Estimates of the Occupants of New Housing
(Residents, School-Age Children, Public School-Age Children)
by State, Housing Type, Housing Size, and Housing Price
Prepared by:
Robert W. Burchell, Ph.D.
David Listokin, Ph.D.
William Dolphin, M.A.
Center for Urban Policy Research
Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning
and Public Policy
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
New Brunswick, New Jersey
June 2006
DESCRIPTION, DEFINITION,AND ORGANIZATION OF
RESIDENTIAL DEMOGRAPHIC MULTIPLIERS
The national, state, and District of Columbia residential demographic multipliers are derived from the 2000 U.S. Census 5-Percent
Public Use Microdata Sample(PUMS). The demographic multipliers include the following data fields and organization:
1. Household Size(HS): Total persons per housing unit.
2. Age distribution of the household members organized into the following age categories: 0-4,5-13, 14-17, 18-24,25-44,45-64,
65-74, 75+.
3. Total school-age children (SAC) or number of persons in the household of school age,defined as those 5 to 17 years old.
(The SAC is the same as the combined number of household members in the 513 and 14-17 age categories.)
4. Total public school-age children (PSAC),or the SAC who attend public schools.
5. The SAC and PSAC by grade group organized as follows: kindergarten (K)–grade 2, grades 3-6, grades 7-9, grades 10-12, and
grade 9 by itself. The above data permit the analyst to tabulate the SAC and PSAC by differing school levels(e.g.,K-6, 7-12,and
9-12).
The demographic fields shown above are differentiated by housing type, housing size, housing price, and housing tenure—four
variables that have been found by Rutgers University to be associated with statistically significant differences in the HS, SAC, and
PSAC.The multipliers are calculated for new housing,here defined as units enumerated in the 2000 census and built from 1990-2000.
The housing or structure types include the following: single-family detached; single family attached, sometimes referred to as
townhouses or townhomes; larger (5-or-more-unit) multifamily buildings, such as garden apartments or stacked flats; smaller
multifamily structures (2 to 4 units), such as a starter two-family home; and mobile homes. As the 2000 census, the source for the
residential multipliers, does not have information on the stories in a housing structure (this was last available in the 1980 census),
multiplier presentations cannot disaggregate multifamily housing into garden,mid-rise,and high-rise categories.
Housing-unit size is measured by the number of bedrooms, and data are presented for housing units ranging from I to 5 bedrooms.
There is an association between housing type and number of bedrooms, and the demographic multiplier tables present the common
configurations for each housing type. For instance, demographic data are shown for 1-through 3-bedroom multifamily units and not
for 4- to 5-bedroom units of this type because multifamily housing tends to be built with fewer rather than more bedrooms. The
opposite is the case for single-family detached homes; in this instance, data are presented for 2- to 5-bedroom units as opposed to
1-bedroom units because detached housing is typically built with more rather than fewer bedrooms.
Housing is additionally classified by tenure: ownership or rental. According to the census, "A housing unit is owner-occupied if the
owner or co-owner lives in the unit even if it is mortgaged or not fully paid for. . . . All occupied housing units that are not owner-
occupied,whether they are rented for cash rent or occupied without payment of cash rent,are classified as renter-occupied."
There is a further differentiation of the demographic profiles by housing value or rent. The census definitions for"value" and"rent"
are shown on the Definitions page;with regard to the latter,the current study indicates the"gross rent"(rent with utilities)rather than
the"contract rent."
Values and gross rents reported in the 2000 census are updated to 2005 using a residential price inflation index available from the
Federal Housing Finance Board. A separate price index is applied for the nation, for each of the 50 states, and for the District of
Columbia.
The demographic profiles by 2005 housing values and gross rents are organized following a four-tiered classification: all value or rent
housing, and then housing arrayed by terciles (thirds) of value or rent(units at the 1st-33rd percentile of value or rent; units at the
33rd through 66th percentile of value or rent; and units at the 67th-100th percentile of value or rent.)
DEFINITIONS OF DATA CONTAINED IN THE U.S. CENSUS OF POPULATION AND HOUSING
PUBLIC USE MICRODATA SAMPLE (PDMS) 2000 AND OTHER MULTIPLIER TERMS
TERMS DEFINITION/COMMENT
Bedrooms(BR) The number of rooms that would be listed as bedrooms if the house,apartment,or mobile home were
listed on the market for sale or rent even if these rooms are currently used for other purposes.
Housing Categories
(Structure Type)
5+units. These are units in structures containing 5 or more housing units.
Mobile home. Both occupied and vacant mobile homes to which no permanent rooms have been
added are counted in this category. Mobile homes used only for business purposes or for extra
sleeping space, and mobile homes for sale on a dealer's lot,at the factory,or in storage,are not
counted in the housing inventory. In 1990,the category was"mobile home or trailer."
Household Size The total number of persons in a housing unit.
Housing Tenure A housing unit is owner-occupied if the owner or co-owner lives in the unit even if it is mortgaged or
(Ownership or not fully paid for. All occupied housing units that are not owner-occupied,whether they are rented for
Rental) cash rent or occupied without payment of cash rent,are classified as renter-occupied.
Housing Unit A housing unit may be a house, an apartment, a mobile home, a group of rooms, or a single
room that is occupied(or if vacant, is intended for occupancy as separate living quarters).
Housing Value Housing value is the census respondent's estimate of how much the property would sell for if it were
(Rent) for sale. In the current study,the value of a rented unit in a 1-to 4-unit structure is estimated to be 100
times the monthly gross rent, and all such units are included with owner-occupied units in calculating the
multipliers.The housing value and rents indicated by the 2000 census were updated to 2005 using a residential
price inflation index (available from the Federal Housing Finance Board)for the nation, for each state,
and for the District of Columbia. Housing value or rent is categorized into a four-tier classification:
all value(or rent)housing,and then housing units arrayed by terciles(thirds)of value(or rent).
Housing Rent Contract rent is the monthly rent agreed to or contracted for, regardless of any furnishings, utilities,
(Contract Rent) fees,meals,or services that may be included.
Housing Rent Gross rent is the contract rent plus the estimated average monthly cost of utilities (electric, gas,water
(Gross Rent) and sewer)and fuels(oil, coal,kerosene,wood, and the like)if these are paid by the renter(or paid for
the renter by someone else). In the current study, the monthly gross rents are indicated in the
demographic table.
Insufficient Sample This notation in a table means that fewer than 600 weighted observations were counted for a housing
type/bedroom/value combination or for an entire housing type/bedroom combination.
Public School-Age The school-age children attending public school.
Children (PSAC)
Residential Multipliers show the population associated with different housing categories as well as housing
Demographic differentiated by housing value,housing size(bedrooms),and housing tenure.
Multipliers
School Age The household members of elementary and secondary school age,defined here as those 5 through 17
Children (SAC) years of age.
NEW YORK(2--1)ALL SCHOOL CHILDREN:
SCHOOL-AGE CHILDREN(SAC)
GRADE
STRUCTURE TYPE
BEDROOMS/ TOTAL Gr. 9
VALUE 2005 /TENURE SAC K-2 3-6 7-9 10-12 Only
Single-Family Detached,2 BR
All Values 0.30 0.09 0.10 0.07 0.04 0.02
Less than$106,000 0.36 0.08 0.11 0.10 0.06 0.03
$106,000 to$164,500 0.28 0.08 0.10 0.06 0.03 0.03
Ningle-t,ami y tietached,4 BR
All Values 1.16 0.32 0.41 0.25 0.18 0.07
Less than$224,500 1.29 0.30 0.45 0.29 0.25 0.10
$224,500 to$329,500 1.15 0.34 0.39 0.24 0.17 0.07
More than$329,500 1.05 0.31 0.38 0.23 0.14 0.06
Single-Family Detached,5 BR
All Values 1.58 0.39 0.53 0.36 0.30 0.12
Less than$329,500 1.75 0.37 0.54 0.46 0.38 0.19
$329,500 to$748,500 1.51 0.38 0.52 0.33 0.29 0.09
More than$748,500 1.47 0.45 0.54 0.27 0.21 0.08
Single-Family Attached,2 BR
All Values 0.22 0.08 0.07 0.04 0.04 0.02
Less than$135,000 0.25 0.09 0.07 0.04 0.05 0.02
$135,000 to$194,500 0.25 0.08 0.08 0.04 0.04 0.02
More than$194,500 0.14 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.02
Single-Family Attached,4 BR
All Values 1.19 0.19 0.48 0.29 0.24 0.07
Less than$224,500 1.54 0.26 0.62 0.39 0.27 0.12
$224,500 to$329,500 1.12 0.09 0.45 0.31 0.27 0.07
More than$329,500 Insufficient Sample
5+Units-Own,1 BR
All Values 0.18 0.06 0.08 0.02 0.02 0.00
Less than$164,500 0.21 0.06 0.08 0.06 0.00 0.00
$164,500 to$269,500 0.19 0.08 0.08 0.00 0.03 0.00
More than$269,500 0.14 0.02 0.08 0.00 0.04 0.00
5+Units-Own,2 BR
All Values 0.15 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.03 0.02
Less than$135,000 0.09 0.02 0.00 0.06 0.01 0.00
$135,000 to$329,500 0.19 0.06 0.06 0.04 0.03 0.03
More than$329,500 0.14 0.00 0.06 0.05 0.03 0.00
5+Units-Own,3 BR
All Values 0.59 0.13 0.11 0.16 0.19 0.06
Less than$224,500 Insufficient Sample
$224,500 to$748,500 Insufficient Sample
More than$748,500 Insufficient Sample
NEW YORK(2--2) ALL SCHOOL CHILDREN:
SCHOOL-AGE CHILDREN(SAC)
GRADE
STRUCTURE TYPE
BEDROOMS/ TOTAL Gr. 9
VALUE 2005 /TENURE SAC K-2 3-6 7-9 10-12 Only
5+Units-Rent,1 BR
All Values 0.16 0.06 0.05 0.03 0.02 0.01
Less than$500 0.10 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.01 0.01
$500 to$1,000 0.30 0.11 0.10 0.05 0.04 0.01
More than$1,000 0.08 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.01
5+Units-Rent,2 BR
All Values 0.49 0.15 0.17 0.10 0.09 0.03
Less than$750 0.74 0.20 0.29 0.12 0.13 0.04
$750 to$1,100 0.51 0.16 0.15 0.11 0.09 0.03
More than$1,100 0.23 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.01
5+Units-Rent,3 BR
All Values 1.36 0.30 0.48 0.31 0.27 0.12
Less than$750 1.59 0.27 0.63 0.38 0.32 0.15
$750 to$1,250 1.50 0.37 0.51 0.34 0.28 0.11
More than$1,250 1.00 0.25 0.31 0.21 0.23 0.10
2-4 Units,1 BR
All Values 0.30 0.09 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.02
Less than$74,500 0.25 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.05 0.02
$74,500 to$110,000 0.30 0.10 0.09 0.04 0.07 0.02
More than$110,000 0.36 0.11 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.04
Mobile,2 BR
All Values 0.25 0.07 0.09 0.04 0.05 0.01
Less than$33,000 0.19 0.07 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.01
$33,000 to$54,000 0.26 0.07 0.12 0.03 0.04 0.01
More than$54,000 0.27 0.08 0.07 0.05 0.06 0.02
Mobile,3 BR
All Values 0.70 0.17 0.23 0.16 0.13 0.06
Less than$45,000 0.72 0.20 0.23 0.15 0.14 0.06
$45,000 to$66,000 0.69 0.16 0.26 0.16 0.11 0.07
More than$66,000 0.68 0.16 0.21 0.16 0.15 0.06
Mobile,4 BR
All Values 1.70 0.31 0.52 0.40 0.46 0.17
Less than$54,000 Insufficient Sample
$54,000 to$78,000 1.60 0.31 0.48 0.32 0.49 0.15
More than$78,000 Insufficient Sample
NEW YORK(3--1)ALL PUBLIC SCHOOL CHILDREN:
SCHOOL-AGE CHILDREN IN PUBLIC SCHOOL(PSAC)
PUBLIC SCHOOL GRADE
STRUCTURE TYPE
BEDROOMS/ TOTAL Gr.9
VALUE 2005 /TENURE PSAC K-2 3-6 7-9 10-12 Only
Single-Family Detached,2 BR
All Values 0.27 0.07 0.09 0.07 0.04 0.02
Less than$106,000 0.32 0.08 0.10 0.09 0.06 0.03
$106,000 to$164,500 0.26 0.07 0.10 0.06 0.03 0.03
More than$164,500 0.21 0.07 0.07 0.05 0.02 0.02
Ningle-u ami y uctached,4 BR
All Values 1.00 0.25 0.36 0.23 0.17 0.07
Less than$224,500 1.15 0.25 0.41 0.27 0.23 0.09
$224,500 to$329,500 0.98 0.27 0.34 0.22 0.16 0.06
More than$329,500 0.87 0.24 0.32 0.19 0.11 0.05
Single-Family Detached,5 BR
All Values 1.23 0.29 0.41 0.28 0.24 0.10
Less than$329,500 1.48 0.30 0.45 0.41 0.32 0.17
$329,500 to$748,500 1.14 0.26 0.40 0.24 0.23 0.08
More than$748,500 1.03 0.34 0.38 0.17 0.14 0.06
Single-Family Attached,2 BR
All Values 0.17 0.06 0.05 0.03 0.03 0.01
Less than$135,000 0.23 0.08 0.07 0.04 0.04 0.02
$135,000 to$194,500 0.18 0.06 0.06 0.03 0.04 0.01
More than$194,500 0.11 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.02
Single-Family Attached,4 BR
All Values 0.86 0.11 0.31 0.23 0.21 0.06
Less than$224,500 0.98 0.17 0.35 0.25 0.20 0.08
$224,500 to$329,500 0.92 0.06 0.32 0.27 0.27 0.07
More than$329,500 Insufficient Sample
5+Units-Own,1 BR
All Values 0.15 0.05 0.07 0.01 0.02 0.00
Less than$164,500 0.18 0.06 0.08 0.04 0.00 0.00
$164,500 to$269,500 0.16 0.06 0.08 0.00 0.03 0.00
More than$269,500 0.10 0.02 0.05 0.00 0.04 0.00
5+Units-Own,2 BR
All Values 0.09 0.02 0.04 0.02 0.01 0.01
Less than$135,000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
$135,000 to$329,500 0.15 0.05 0.06 0.02 0.03 0.02
More than$329,500 0.05 0.00 0.03 0.02 0.00 0.00
5+Units-Own,3 BR
All Values 0.49 0.10 0.07 0.14 0.19 0.06
Less than$224,500 Insufficient Sample
$224,500 to$748,500 Insufficient Sample
More than$748,500 Insufficient Sample
NEW YORK(3--2) ALL PUBLIC SCHOOL CHILDREN:
SCHOOL-AGE CHILDREN IN PUBLIC SCHOOL(PSAC)
PUBLIC SCHOOL GRADE
STRUCTURE TYPE
BEDROOMS/ TOTAL Gr. 9
VALUE 2005 /TENURE PSAC K-2 3-6 7-9 10-12 Only
5+Units-Rent,1 BR
All Values 0.15 0.05 0.05 0.03 0.02 0.01
Less than$500 0.09 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.01 0.01
$500 to$1,000 0.27 0.09 0.09 0.05 0.04 0.01
More than$1,000 0.07 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01
5+Units-Rent,2 BR
All Values 0.43 0.13 0.14 0.08 0.08 0.03
Less than$750 0.67 0.19 0.26 0.11 0.12 0.04
$750 to$1,100 0.45 0.14 0.13 0.09 0.08 0.03
More than$1,100 0.16 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.01
5+Units-Rent,3 BR
All Values 1.07 0.23 0.37 0.25 0.23 0.09
Less than$750 1.27 0.22 0.47 0.30 0.29 0.10
$750 to$1,250 1.30 0.31 0.44 0.31 0.23 0.11
More than$1,250 0.63 0.14 0.20 0.12 0.17 0.06
2-4 Units,1 BR
All Values 0.27 0.08 0.07 0.06 0.07 0.02
Less than$74,500 0.23 0.06 0.07 0.07 0.04 0.02
$74,500 to$110,000 0.28 0.09 0.09 0.04 0.06 0.02
More than$110,000 0.30 0.09 0.05 0.07 0.09 0.03
Mobile,2 BR
All Values 0.24 0.07 0.08 0.04 0.05 0.01
Less than$33,000 0.19 0.07 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.01
$33,000 to$54,000 0.25 0.07 0.11 0.03 0.04 0.01
More than$54,000 0.27 0.08 0.07 0.05 0.06 0.02
Mobile,3 BR
All Values 0.69 0.17 0.23 0.16 0.13 0.06
Less than$45,000 0.71 0.20 0.23 0.15 0.14 0.05
$45,000 to$66,000 0.68 0.15 0.26 0.16 0.11 0.07
More than$66,000 0.67 0.15 0.21 0.15 0.15 0.06
Mobile,4 BR
All Values 1.61 0.28 0.50 0.38 0.45 0.16
Less than$54,000 Insufficient Sample
$54,000 to$78,000 1.56 0.31 0.46 0.29 0.49 0.13
More than$78,000 Insufficient Sample
LA
+-
V)
4-1
v
V A4ASER
(A
V C 0 N S U L T I N 6 P. A.
4-
E
o
w Traffic Impact Study
Sun Homes
s
At Reckson Executive Park
I U Rye Brook, Westchester County, New York
i Q
Q
January 14, 2015
U Prepared For
Mr. William Null
Cuddy & Feder LLP
445 Hamilton Avenue - 14th Floor
White Plains, NY 10601
Ln
o Prepared By
Maser Consulting P.A.
{ > 11 Bradhurst Avenue
Hawthorne, NY 10532
914.347.7500
CIA
John T. Colli s P ., P.E„ Principal Associate
License No. 46029
I v
v Ronald P. Rieman, Assistant Project Manager
MC Project No. 14001622A
i
www.maserconsulting.com
Traffic Impact Study
avc, Sun Homes at Reckson Executive Park
MASER MC Project No.: 14001622A
C11111111timl P. A. Table of Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE NO.
A. INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................1
B. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION.......................................................................1
C. YEAR 2014 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES.....................................................................1
D. YEAR 2019 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES....................................................................2
E. YEAR 2019 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES W/APPROVED OFFICE.................................3
F. YEAR 2019 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES W/PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL.....................3
G. DESCRIPTION OF ANALYSIS PROCEDURES..................................................................4
H. RESULTS OF ANALYSIS.....................................................................................................5
I. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION........................................................................................8
APPENDICES
APPENDIXA............................................................................................................................FIGURES
APPENDIXB..............................................................................................................................TABLES
APPENDIX C..................................................................................... LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS
APPENDIX D......................................................................CAPACITY ANALYSIS SUMMARY SHEETS
APPENDIXE.................................................................................................................... COUNT DATA
;4V Traffic Impact Study
Sun Homes at Reckson Executive Park
MASER MC Project No.: 14001622A
C6 . 6VIT1 . 9 , , Pagel of8
A. INTRODUCTION
This Study was prepared to evaluate the potential traffic impacts of the proposed Sun
Homes residential development proposed at Reckson Executive Park on the surrounding
roadway network. The following sections provide a description of the proposed Project
and the tasks undertaken in completing our evaluation.
B. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION
Sun Homes is proposing a 110 home (100 market rate homes and 10 affordable units) on
property located at Reckson Executive Park in Rye Brook, New York. Access will be
provided by the existing signalized driveway to the Reckson Executive Park
(International Drive) as shown on Figure No. 1 in Appendix A of this Study.
Phase I and II of Reckson Executive Park consists of 540,000 s.f. of existing office space
of which 154,000 s.f. is currently vacant. (See Section D of this Study). The Proposed
Residential development will replace the previously approved Reckson Executive Park
Phase III office space (280,000 s.f.). This is further discussed in Section E of this Study.
C. YEAR 2014 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES
In order to identify current traffic conditions in the vicinity of the Site, turning movement
traffic counts were conducted on Thursday, November 13, 2014 between the hours of
7:00 AM and 9:30 AM to determine the Weekday Peak AM Highway Hour and between
the hours of 4:00 PM and 6:30 PM to determine the Weekday Peak PM Highway Hour
for the following intersections:
• King Street (Route 120A) and Anderson Hill Road
• King Street (Route 120A) and International Drive (Reckson Executive Park)
Based upon a review of the traffic counts, the peak hours generally are:
■ Weekday Peak AM Highway Hour 7:30 AM—8:30 AM
■ Weekday Peak PM Highway Hour 5:00 PM—6:00 PM
The resulting Year 2014 Existing Traffic Volumes are shown on Figures No. 2 and 3 for
the Weekday Peak AM and Weekday Peak PM Highway Hours, respectively.
;4V Traffic Impact Study
Sun Homes at Reckson Executive Park
MASER MC Project No.: 14001622A
E I M t Y L T l X G R 1 Page 2 of 8
D. YEAR 2019 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES
For the purpose of analysis, a Design Year of 2019 has been utilized in completing the
traffic analysis.
In order to account for normal background traffic growth in the area including traffic for
the Brunswick School Expansion and Kingswood Residential Development, the Year
2014 Existing Traffic Volumes were increased by a total background growth rate of 10%.
The resulting Year 2019 Projected Traffic Volumes are shown on Figures No. 4 and 5 for
each of the Peak Hours, respectively.
In addition, traffic for the unrented office space at Reckson Executive Park (154,000 s.f.)
was included as part of the background traffic volume. The Hourly Trip Generation
Rates (HTGR) and anticipated Site Generated Traffic Volumes are summarized below.
ENTRY EXIT TOTAL
UNRENTED
HTGR Volume HTGR Volume HTGR Volume
154,000 s.f. Office
Weekday Peak AM Highway Hour 1.37 211 0.19 29 1.56 240
Weekday Peak PM Highway Hour 0.25 39 1.24 191 1.49 230
Based on ITE Land Use 710-Office—ITE Trip Generation Manual,9`k Edition,2012
In order to assign the unrented office space traffic volumes to the roadway network, it
was necessary to establish an arrival/departure distribution. Based on a review of the
existing traffic volumes on the surrounding roadway network and expected travel
patterns, an arrival/departure distribution was established and is shown on Figure No. 6.
The resulting unrented office space traffic volumes are shown on Figures No. 7 and 8 for
each of the Peak Hours, respectively. These volumes were added the Year 2019
Projected Traffic Volumes to obtain the Year 2019 No-Build Traffic Volumes.
The resulting Year 2019 No-Build Traffic Volumes are shown on Figures No. 9 and 10
for each of the Peak Hours, respectively.
49V Traffic Impact Study
Sun Homes at Reckson Executive Park
IVIS E R MC Project No.: 14001622A
CONSULTING P. A. Page 3 of 8
E. YEAR 2019 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES W/APPROVED OFFICE
As previously discussed, Reckson Executive Park has been approved for an additional
280,000 s.f. office building (R.E.P. Phase III). The Hourly Trip Generation Rates and
anticipated Site Generated Traffic Volumes are summarized below:
ENTRY EXIT TOTAL
APPROVED - OFFICE
HTGR Volume HTGR Volume HTGR Volume
280,000 s.f. Office
Weekday Peak AM Highway Hour 1.37 384 0.19 53 1.56 437
Weekday Peak PM Highway Hour 0.25 70 1.24 347 1.49 417
Based on ITE Land Use 710-Office—ITE Trip Generation Manual,Vh Edition,2012
The Approved Site Generated Traffic Volumes for the 280,000 s.f. R.E.P. Phase III
Office were assigned to the roadway network based on the arrival/departure distribution
patterns shown on Figure No. 6. The resulting Approved Site Generated Traffic Volumes
are shown on Figures No. 11 and 12 for each of the Peak Hours, respectively. These
volumes were added to the Year 2019 No-Build Traffic Volumes to obtain the Year 2019
Build Traffic Volumes with the Approved 280,000 s.f. Office.
The resulting Year 2019 Build Traffic Volumes with the Approved 280,000 s.f. Office
are shown on Figures No. 13 and 14 for each of the Peak Hours, respectively.
F. YEAR 2019 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES W/PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL
As previously discussed, the Proposed Residential development (110 homes) will replace
the previously Approved Reckson Executive Park (R.E.P.) Phase III Office (280,000 s.f.).
The Hourly Trip Generation Rates and anticipated Site Generated Traffic Volumes for
the 110 homes are summarized below:
ENTRY EXIT TOTAL
PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL
HTGR Volume HTGR Volume HTGR Volume
110 homes
Weekday Peak AM Highway Hour 0.20 22 0.59 65 0.79 87
Weekday Peak PM Highway Hour 0.66 73 0.38 42 1.04 115
Based on ITE Land Use 210-Single Family Housing—ITE Trip Generation Manual,90Edition,2012
Traffic Impact Study
Sun Homes at Reckson Executive Park
MASER MC Project No.: 14001622A
eea Iairixc F. A.
Page 4of8
The Proposed Site Generated Traffic Volumes for the 110 homes were assigned to the
roadway network based on the arrival/departure distribution patterns shown on Figure
No. 15. The resulting Proposed Site Generated Traffic Volumes are shown on Figures
No. 16 and 17 for each of the Peak Hours, respectively. These volumes were added to
the Year 2019 No-Build Traffic Volumes to obtain the Year 2019 Build Traffic Volumes
with the Proposed Residential— 110 homes.
The resulting Year 2019 Build Traffic Volumes with the Proposed Residential — 110
homes are shown on Figures No. 18 and 19 for each of the Peak Hours, respectively.
The change from Office (280,000 s.f.) to Residential (110 homes) would result in 350
fewer vehicles during the Weekday Peak AM Highway Hour and 302 fewer vehicles
during the Weekday Peak PM Highway Hour.
G. DESCRIPTION OF ANALYSIS PROCEDURES
In order to determine existing and future traffic operating conditions at the Study Area
Intersections, it was necessary to perform capacity analyses. The following is a brief
description of the analysis method utilized in this report:
The capacity analysis for a signalized intersection was performed in accordance with the
procedures described in the 2010 Highway Capacity Manual, published by the
Transportation Research Board. The terminology used in identifying traffic flow
conditions is Levels of Service. A Level of Service "A"represents the best condition and
a Level of Service "F" represents the worst condition. A Level of Service "C" is
generally used as a design standard while a Level of Service "D" is acceptable during
peak periods. A Level of Service "E" represents an operation near capacity. In order to
identify an intersection's Level of Service, the average amount of vehicle delay is
computed for each approach to the intersection as well as for the overall intersection.
Additional information concerning signalized Levels of Service can be found in
Appendix C of this Study.
4CV, Traffic Impact Study
Sun Homes at Reckson Executive Park
MASER MC Project No.: 14001622A
gym. „ „ N
Page 5of8
H. RESULTS OF ANALYSIS
In order to evaluate current and future traffic operating conditions, SYNCHRO analyses
were conducted at each of the study area intersections utilizing the procedures described
above. Summarized below is a description of the existing geometrics, traffic control and
a summary of the existing and future Levels of Service. Copies of the SYNCHRO
analysis which also indicate the existing geometry for each of the intersections studied
are contained in Appendix D of this Study.
Table No. 1 summarizes the Levels of Service and delays for the Year 2014 Existing,
Year 2019 No-Build, Year 2019 Build with Approved 280,000 s.f. Office and Year 2019
Build with Proposed Residential— 110 Homes Conditions.
1. King Street(Route 120A) and Anderson Hill Road
Anderson Hill Road intersects King Street (Route 120A) at a "T” type, signalized
intersection. The King Street (Route 120A) northbound approach consists of two lanes in
the form of a separate left turn lane and a separate through lane and the King Street
(Route 120A) southbound approach consists of two lanes in the form of a separate
through lane and separate right turn lane. The Anderson Hill Road westbound approach
consists of two lanes in the form of a separate left turn lane and a separate right turn lane.
Year 2014 Existing Traffic Volumes
Capacity analysis conducted utilizing the Year 2014 Existing Traffic Volumes indicates
that the intersection is currently operating at an overall Level of Service "B" during the
Weekday Peak AM Highway Hour and is currently operating at an overall Level of
Service "B" during the Weekday Peak PM Highway Hour.
Year 2019 No-Build Traffic Volumes
Capacity analysis conducted utilizing the Year 2019 No-Build Traffic Volumes indicates
that the intersection is projected to operate at an overall Level of Service "B" during the
Weekday Peak AM Highway Hour and is projected to operate at an overall Level of
Service "C" during the Weekday Peak PM Highway Hour.
W/ Signal Optimization
With signal timing changes (signal optimization) the intersection is projected to operate
at an overall Level of Service "B" during the Weekday Peak AM Highway Hour and is
projected to operate at an overall Level of Service "B" during the Weekday Peak PM
Highway Hour.
;4V Traffic Impact Study
Sun Homes at Reckson Executive Park
MASER MC Project No.: 14001622A
E N N t b L, , N N F. A. Page 6 of 8
Year 2019 Build Traffic Volumes—Approved 280,000 s.£ Office
Capacity analysis conducted utilizing the Year 2019 Build Traffic Volumes with the
Approved 280,000 Office indicates that the intersection is projected to operate at an
overall Level of Service "C" during the Weekday Peak AM Highway Hour and is
projected to operate at an overall Level of Service "D" during the Weekday Peak PM
Highway Hour.
W/ Signal Optimization
With signal timing changes (signal optimization) the intersection is projected to operate
at an overall Level of Service "C" during the Weekday Peak AM Highway Hour and is
projected to operate at an overall Level of Service "C" during the Weekday Peak PM
Highway Hour.
Year 2019 Build Traffic Volumes—Proposed Residential— 110 Homes
Capacity analysis conducted utilizing the Year 2019 Build Traffic Volumes with the
Proposed Residential — 110 Homes indicates that the intersection is projected to operate
at an overall Level of Service "B" during the Weekday Peak AM Highway Hour and is
projected to operate at an overall Level of Service "C" during the weekday Peak PM
Highway Hour.
W/ Signal Optimization
With signal timing changes (signal optimization) the intersection is projected to operate
at an overall Level of Service "B" during the Weekday Peak AM Highway Hour and is
projected to operate at an overall Level of Service "C" during the Weekday Peak PM
Highway Hour.
2. King Street Route 120A and Reckson Executive Park International Drive
Reckson Executive Park (International Drive) intersects King Street (Route 120A) at a
"T" type signalized intersection. The King Street (Route 120A) northbound approach
consists of two lanes in the form of a separate left turn lane and a separate through lane
and the King Street (Route 120A) southbound approach consists of two lanes in the form
of a separate through lane and separate right turn lane. The Reckson Executive Park
(International Drive) westbound approach consists of two lanes in the form of a separate
left turn lane and a separate right turn lane.
Year 2014 Existiniz Traffic Volumes
Capacity analysis conducted utilizing the Year 2014 Existing Traffic Volumes indicates
that the intersection is currently operating at an overall Level of Service "A" during the
Weekday Peak AM Highway Hour and is currently operating at an overall Level of
Service "A" during the Weekday Peak PM Highway Hour.
4V9 Traffic Impact Study
Sun Homes at Reckson Executive Park
MASER MC Project No.: 14001622A
E I I A Y L f I M A P. A.
Page 7 of 8
Year 2019 No-Build Traffic Volumes
Capacity analysis conducted utilizing the Year 2019 No-Build Traffic Volumes indicates
that the intersection is projected to operate at an overall Level of Service "A" during the
Weekday Peak AM Highway Hour and is projected to operate at an overall Level of
Service "B" during the Weekday Peak PM Highway Hour.
W/ Signal Optimization
With signal timing changes (signal optimization) the intersection is projected to operate
at an overall Level of Service "A" during the Weekday Peak AM Highway Hour and is
projected to operate at an overall Level of Service "B" during the Weekday Peak PM
Highway Hour.
Year 2019 Build Traffic Volumes—Approved 280,000 s.f. Office
Capacity analysis conducted utilizing the Year 2019 Build Traffic Volumes with the
Approved 280,000 Office indicates that the intersection is projected to operate at an
overall Level of Service "E" during the Weekday Peak AM Highway Hour and is
projected to operate at an overall Level of Service "C" during the Weekday Peak PM
Highway Hour.
W/ Signalptimization
With signal timing changes (signal optimization) the intersection is projected to operate
at an overall Level of Service "C" during the Weekday Peak AM Highway Hour and is
projected to operate at an overall Level of Service "C" during the Weekday Peak PM
Highway Hour.
Year 2019 Build Traffic Volumes—Proposed Residential — 110 Homes
Capacity analysis conducted utilizing the Year 2019 Build Traffic Volumes with the
Proposed Residential — 110 Homes indicates that the intersection is projected to operate
at an overall Level of Service "B" during the Weekday Peak AM Highway Hour and is
projected to operate at an overall Level of Service "B" during the weekday Peak PM
Highway Hour.
W/ Signalptimization
With signal timing changes (signal optimization) the intersection is projected to operate
at an overall Level of Service "A" during the Weekday Peak AM Highway Hour and is
projected to operate at an overall Level of Service "B" during the Weekday Peak PM
Highway Hour.
Traffic Impact Study
Sun Homes at Reckson Executive Park
MASER MC Project No.: 14001622A
C I AeiriIa P. A.
Page 8 of 8
I. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION
As summarized in this Study,the proposed Residential development (110 homes) will not
significantly affect the area roadways. Similar Levels of Service and delays are expected
under Future No-Build and Future Build Conditions. It addition it should be noted that
the Proposed Residential development would result in significantly fewer vehicles and
better Levels of Service when compared to the traffic generated by the approved Reckson
Executive Park(R.E.P.) Phase III office building.
r:\projects\2014\14001622a-residential\reports\traffic\word\150114 tis.docx
'i 4W
Traffic Impact Study
Sun Homes at Reckson Executive Park
MASER MC Project No.: 14001622A
C!N f N I T I II I F. N. Appendix
SUN HOMES A T RECKSON EXECUTIVE PARK
APPENDIX A
FIGURES
KING STREET
(ROUTE 120A)
SITE EXECUTIVEINTERNATIONAL DRIVE
PARK
ANDERSON HILL ROAD
KING STREET
(ROUTE 120A)
NOTE:LINE DIAGRAM NOTTO SCALE
1, 41M' ASM
SUN HOMES @ RECKSON EXECUTIVE PARK
WESTCHESTER OFFICE RYE BROOK,NEW YORK
11 Bradhurst Avenue O
al
Cen5di%Muniv &bwY Intal Engineers Hawthorne, NY 10532
Pknnm•Srwp;-Lmd;copr Architects Phone: 914.347.7500 JOB NUMBER: DATE'
Stale a!N Y,Cralikilic d Authu a w: 0000172 Fax: 914.347.7266 SITE LOCATION 14001622A 1 1/13 2015
New Jersev NewYOrk Pennsvlvania Virginia m email: solutions @ maserconsulting.co
FIGURE NUMBER:
Customer Loyalty through Client Satisfaction 1
KING STREET
(ROUTE 120A)
CD 0
RECKSON
SITE EXECUTIVE INTERNAl10NAL DRIVE
PARK 2
N O
11�,
Ln
Q0 r-
ANDERSON HILL ROAD 41
118
117 N
— co
KING STREET
(ROUTE 120A)
NOTE:LINE DIAGRAM NOTTO SCALE
SUN HOMES @ RECKSON EXECUTIVE PARK
RYE BROOK,NEW YORK
441"
WESTCHESTER OFFICE, b , FITINI P.A. 11 Bradhurst Avenue O
Caas+l*Moko&Cnvrwrmld(qo w5 Hawthorne, NY 10532
Pmncra•Sums•lan14 ksMlccls Phone: 914.347.7500 YEAR 2014 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES ,TOB NUMBER: DATE:
Stale oI N.Y Cairficale!of AvthWmclke;0000172 Fax: 914.347.7266 WEEKDAY PEAK AM HIGHWAY HOUR 14001622A 1 1/13/2015
MtN lo'60 N Y rk_ PennSYWBnH ver Iriw email: solutions @maserconsulting.com FIGURE NUMBER:
%' 4y i
Customer Loyaey fArorlQlr Client Sa:ltSetlWn 2
KING STREET
(ROUTE 120A)
M
fu
RECKSON4 1
SITE EXECUTIVE INTERNATIONAL DRIVE
PARK 64- I
147--+ Ln
mop Ln�
ANDERSON HILL ROAD 1
79�
�r
KING STREET
(ROUTE 120A)
NOTE:LINE DIAGRAM NOTTO SCALE
� SUN HOMES @ RECKSON EXECUTIVE PARK
9&"SM WESTCHESTER OFFICE RYE BROOK,NEW YORK
P.A. 11 Bradhurst Avenue O
Consulting,1lumco k Fnvirwrrold��Igsneers Hawthorne, NY 10532
Planners•Sufwtyps•tanduapa Architects Phone: 914.347.7500 YEAR 2014 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES JOB NUMBER: DATE
State of N.Y.CaGkda d Wtbpadlpe 0000172 Fax: 914.347.7266 WEEKDAY PEAK PM HIGHWAY HOUR 14001622A 1 1/13/2015
New JerseNew York Pennsylvania Virginia email: solutions @ maserconsulting.com FICURE NUMBER:
y
Customer Loyalty through Client Satisfaction 3
KING STREET
(ROUTE 120A)
0
Lnu(-p
RECKSON
SITE EXECUTIVE INTERNATIONAL DRIVE
.41 '� t
PARK 2A'
to n
ANDERSON HILL ROAD 41
--#] n co
KING STREET
(ROUTE 120A)
NOTE:LINE DIAGRAM NOT TO SCALE
9 SUN HOMES @ RECKSON EXECUTIVE PARK
WESTCHESTER OFFICE RYE BROOK.NEW YORK
r c f r f I R c r a 11 Bradhurst Avenue O
Cmslling,hull&EmVarwtol fngineers Hawthorne, NY 10532
Plrxwlcrs•Sxrcyyaors•I.rridscryc Architects Phone: 914.347.7500 YEAR 2019 PROJECTED TRAFFIC VOLUMES JOB NUMBER: DATE:
Sloleol A,Y,Gslificals of Wllwr¢olbn 0000172 Fax: 914.347.7266 WEEKDAY PEAK AM HIGHWAY HOUR 14001622A 1 1/13/2015
New Jersey New York Pennsylvania Virginia email: solutions @ maserconsulting.com FIGURE NUMBER:
Customer Loyalty fhrough Client Satisfaction 4
KING STREET
(ROUTE 120A)
RECKSON
SITE EXECUTIVE SITE DRIVE .41
�
PARK 7000
1
162 —N'
00
�N
07 CO
ANDERSON HILL ROAD .41
87U-)00
217 n
KING STREET
(ROUTE 120A)
NOTE:LINE DIAGRAM NOT TO SCALE
SUN HOMES @ RECKSON EXECUTIVE PARK
iWMASMWESTCHESTER OFFICE RYE BROOK,NEW YORK O
r+ 11 Bradhurst Avenue
Consulting,l oWO 4 fm?omintd£ngineers Hawthorne, NY 10532
Planners•Suayats tooicope kdiilects Phone: 914.347.7500 YEAR 2019 PROJECTED TRAFFIC VOLUMES JOB NUMBER: DATE:
State of N.Y.Ccr f alc of IWlfwnratioa: 0000172 Fax: 914.347.7266 WEEKDAY PEAK PM HIGHWAY HOUR 14001622A 1 1/13 2015
New Jersev New York Pennsylvania Virginia email: solutions @ maserconsulting.com FIGURE NUMBER:
Customer Loyalty through Client Satisfaction 5
KING STREET
(ROUTE 120A)
0
SITE EXECUTIVEINTERNATIONAL DRIVE
PARK 130%1—+ 0
[70%]--+ o
INV
00
ANDERSON HILL ROAD 1
10%—+
0--+ o
cD
KING STREET % - ARRIVAL
(ROUTE 120A) [%] - DEPARTURE
NOTE:LINE DIAGRAM NOTTO SCALE
SUN HOMES @ RECKSON EXECUTIVE PARK
IWMASWESTCHESTER OFFICERYE BROOK.NEW YORK
, , e t ,t t ,e , '.i 11 Bradhurst Avenue O
CmWtim;Um4d k Environmental Engineers Hawthorne, NY 10532
M mors•Save "l.mAcope Architects Phone: 914.347.7500 ARRIVAL/DEPARTURE DISTRIBUTION JOB NUMBERS DATE:
Stale 01 k.Y.Cert. ole of Authorization:0000172 Fax: 914.347.7266 (OFFICE) 14001622A 1 1/13/2015
N"jgmv_____tvewYo>___ Perk, vans Vr�irua email: solutions @maserconsulting.com FIGURE NUMBER:
Cusbnwr UWW INOt"Grant SatiSlppPon
6
KING STREET
(ROUTE 120A)
r7
SITE EXECUTIVE INTERNATIONAL DRIVE
� �
PARK 9-4
ao 0
20--+
1)
ANDERSON HILL ROAD 41
21—+
0—+
KING STREET
(ROUTE 120A)
NOTE:LINE DIAGRAM NOT TO SCALE
SUN HOMES @ RECKSON EXECUTIVE PARK
� WESTCHESTER OFFICE RYE BROOK NEW YORK
• '� 11 Bradhurst Avenue O
r e E Ar r r y e s Hawthorne, NY 10532
Consulting hNmkipol h Ensvwmmid Enggineers OTHER DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC VOLUMES
Planners•Srwrc�ors•Londscope kchilects Phone: 914.347.7500 JOB NEJf.RF3ER: DATE'
Stale of H Y.Ceeli6cglr e1 Aulhofrioton:0000172Fax: 914.347.7266 WEEKDAY PEAK AM HIGHWAY HOUR
UNRENTED OFFICE SPACE 154,00 S.F. 14001622A 1/13/2015
email: solutions 0 maserconsulting.com ( ) FIGURE NUMBER-
New Jersey New York Pennsylvania Virginia
Customer Loyalty through Client satisfaction
KING STREET
(ROUTE 120A)
N
RECKSON
SITE EXECUTIVE SITE DRIVE .41
PARK 57—+
134 N
01
ANDERSON HILL ROAD .41
4—# 01 T
KING STREET
(ROUTE 120A)
NOTE:LINE DIAGRAM NOT TO SCALE
' SUN HOMES @ RECKSON EXECUTIVE PARK
WESTCHESTER OFFICE RYE BROOK NEW YORK
11 Bradhurst Avenue O
Consulting,Municipal k Environmental Engineers Hawthorne, NY 10532 OTHER DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC VOLUMES
Planners•Surveyors•Landscape Architects Phone: 914.347.7500 JOB NUMBER; DATE:
Slate of N.Y.Certificate of Authorization:0000172 Fax: 914.347.7266 WEEKDAY PEAK PM HIGHWAY HOUR 14001622A 1/13/2015
email: solutions ®maserconsulting.com (UNRENTED OFFICE SPACE-154,000 S.F.) FIGURE NUMBER:
New Jerse v New York Pennsylvania Virginia
Customer Loyalty through Client satisfaction 8
KING STREET
(ROUTE 120A)
vC)
r-
SITE EXECUTIVE INTERNATIONAL DRIVE
PARK 17
32—+
(U�
0
Coln
0,1110
ANDERSON HILL ROAD
151 '
129
� Go
KING STREET
(ROUTE 120A)
NOTE:LINE DIAGRAM NOT TO SCALE
SUN HOMES @ RECKSON EXECUTIVE PARK
WESTCHESTER OFFICE. RYE BROOK,NEW YORK
4WM&SM■ .t l i t c t r■ f P. 11 Bradhurst Avenue O
Ctmsvling,MwFKod k Ff llwiti W Engineers Hawthorne, NY 10532
Ptmnws 1&AWyws•tv>4scap�I4ehitects Phone: 914.347.7500 YEAR 2019 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES JOB NUMBER: DATE-
State nI 111 Califrole of tialtw Ula.0000172 Fax: 914.347.7266 WEEKDAY PEAK AM HIGHWAY HOUR 14001622A 1 1/13/2015
NewJersev New York Pennsylvania Virginia email: solutions @ maserconsulting.com FIGURE NUMBER:
Customer Loyalty through Client Satisfaction 9
KING STREET
(ROUTE 120A)
rnLn
SITE EXEC S INTERNATIONAL DRIVE .411
PARK 127 O
296 r'N
ANDERSON HILL ROAD
91�
217
KING STREET
(ROUTE 120A)
NOTE:LINE DIAGRAM NOT TO SCALE
�►__. SUN HOMES @ RECKSON EXECUTIVE PARK
WESTCHESTER OFFICE RYE BROOK,NEW YORK
r .< < s , z r , i, e J.A. 11 Bradhurst Avenue O
Condit,Wmicyd h Enweemental Enyineers Hawthorne, NY 10532
ftnas•Sur�e�ps•Ladscape Architects Phone: 914.347.7500 YEAR 2019 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES JOB NUMBER: DATE:
SIMe vl k.Y.Ceh'fiwlt vt Authonzation:0000172 Fax: 914.347.7266 WEEKDAY PEAK PM HIGHWAY HOUR 14001622A 1 1/13/2015
New Jerseemail: solutions @ maserconsulting.com FIGURE NUMBER:
y New York Pennsylvania Virginia
Loyalty through Client Satisfaction 10
KING STREET
(ROUTE 120A)
to
�o
SITE EXECUTIVE INTERNATIONAL DRIVE
PARK 16—# O
37—+ cNo
N
Ln n
ANDERSON HILL ROAD 41
39� O
N
KING STREET
(ROUTE 120A)
NOTE:LINE DIAGRAM NOT TO SCALE
i4y "),
SUN HOMES @ RECKSON EXECUTIVE PARK
WESTCHESTER OFFICE RYE BROOK,NEW YORK
r , , 11 Bradhurst Avenue O
Canwlf-K Wmn o h Emla wltll fnggineers Hawthorne, NY 10532 APPROVED
Plomrrs•Swryws•LaMuopc!Vrhitects Phone: 914.347.7500 SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES JOB NUMBER' DATE:
State W N.Y.Cnt'Srale of tiuthoraol,,11000172 Fax: 914.347.7266 WEEKDAY PEAK AM HIGHWAY HOUR 14001622A 1 1/13/2015
NewJersev New York Pennsylvania Virginia email: solutions o maserconsulting.com (OFFICE-280,000 S.F.) FIGURE NUMBER:
Customer Loyalty through Client satisfaction 11
KING STREET
(ROUTE 120A)
�o
SITE EXECUTIVE INTERNATIONAL DRIVE
PARK 104
♦l T
M o
243
co
LOC)
M cd
ANDERSON HILL ROAD
7---+ CD CUT
0--+
KING STREET
(ROUTE 120A)
NOTE:LINE DIAGRAM NOT TO SCALE
SUN HOMES @ RECKSON EXECUTIVE PARK
WESTCHESTER OFFICE RYE BROOK.NEW YORK
JAIMASM I e n r Y L T I n I F.A. 11 Bradhurst Avenue O
Consu�l'+�g,uunico&Enwammtd Falyineers Hawthorne, NY 10532 APPROVED
Ptontma•Svrelvrs•lwtdsaope kehilects Phone: 914.347.7500 SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES JOB NUMBER: DATE:
Stott of ft krli400lra}FuV�on 10 1)0110172 Fax: 914.347.7266 WEEKDAY PEAK PM HIGHWAY HOUR 14001622A 1/13/2015
New Jersey New York Pennsylvania Virginia
email: solutions a moserconsulting.com (OFFICE-280,000 S.F.) FIGURE NUMBER:
Customer Loyalty through Client Sallsfadon 12
KING STREET
(ROUTE 120A)
rno
N f\
N CD
RECKSON4
SITE EXECUTIVE INTERNATIONAL DRIVE
PARK 27� I
69-
Lr
i-)N
O 011
ANDERSON HILL ROAD
190
129- o0
� o
KING STREET
(ROUTE 120A)
NOTE:LINE DIAGRAM NOT TO SCALE
%4b
SUN HOMES @ RECKSON EXECUTIVE PARK
WESTCHESTER OFFICE RYE BROOK,NEW YORK
e o n r u L r l n r r.w. 11 Bradhurst Avenue O
com-Alis mvnicgd&Enwowentd Enggineers Hawthorne, NY 10532 YEAR 2019 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES
Nunes,sm"ors•LmdsroPe k2liects Phone: 914.347.7500 J013 iVUM[3ER: bnTE:
slaty 0 NY.relfcale of FutAouolim: 0000172 Fax: 914.347.7266 WEEKDAY PEAK AM HIGHWAY HOUR
(W/APPROVED 280,000 S.F.OFFICE) 14001622A 1/13/2015
New Jersey New York Pennsylvania Virginia email: solutions @ maserconsulting.com FIGURE NUMBER:
Customer Loyalty through Client Satisfaction 13
KING STREET
(ROUTE 120A)
o�
RECKSON ♦11
SITE EXECUTIVE INTERNATIONAL DRIVE
PARK 231—+ O
539—+ 00 CN
c0
L
ANDERSON HILL ROAD 41
98—+
217—+ "2 110
� LO
KING STREET
(ROUTE 120A)
NOTE:LINE DIAGRAM NOT TO SCALE
SUN HOMES @ RECKSON EXECUTIVE PARK
4
WESTCHESTER OFFICE RYE BROOK,NEW YORK
410
r, r r .r r,a. ..w. 11 Bradhurst Avenue O
Consulting,Mwkko&Fnwonmentd Enyineers Hawthorne, NY 10532 YEAR 2019 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES
Planners"Sur.�c�pars'to ,cope Frciiilects Phone: 914.347.7500 ,,)R NUMBER: DATE:
Slate of N,Y.wifia0le of Aalhnrrroliore 0000172 Fox: 914.347.7266 WEEKDAY PEAK PM HIGHWAY HOUR 14001622A 1/13/2015
email: solutions a maserconsulting.com (W/APPROVED 280,000 S.F.OFFICE) F[GURE NUMBER-
New Jersey New York Pennsylvania Virginia
Customer Loyalty through Client Satisfaction 14
KING STREET
(ROUTE 120A)
X
0
rq o
SITE EXECUTIVE INTERNATIONAL DRIVE t
PARK [30%]—+ O
o
00
ANDERSON HILL ROAD *
10
00
0�
KING STREET % - ARRIVAL
(ROUTE 120A) [/] - DEPARTURE
NOTE:LINE DIAGRAM NOT TO SCALE
SUN HOMES @ RECKSON EXECUTIVE PARK
IWMASM WESTCHESTER OFFICE RYE BROOK,NEW YORK
11 Bradhurst Avenue
,+
O
NoalthliWmo&Emionmental Engineers Hawthorne, NY 10532
Plmncrs•Survc 'tondsccpe Architects Phone: 914.347.7500 ARRIVAL/DEPARTURE DISTRIBUTION JOB NUMBER: DATE:
State oS WA Cerfifrcde of Authorization:0000172 Fax: 914.347.7266
(RESIDENTIAL) 14001622A 1 1/13/2015
New Jersey New York Pennsylvania Virginia email: solutions @ moserconsulting.com FIGURE NUMBER:
Customer Loyalty through Client Satisfaction 5
KING STREET
(ROUTE 120A)
SI TE EXECUTIVEINTERNATIONAL DRIVE �
�
PARK 19—+
46--+
ANDERSON HILL ROAD 1
2 0T
0�
KING STREET
(ROUTE 120A)
NOTE:LINE DIAGRAM NOT TO SCALE
ME
SUN HOMES @ RECKSON EXECUTIVE PARK
WESTCHESTER OFFICE RYE BROOK,NEW YORK
r A 11 Bradhurst Avenue O
Hawthorne, NY 10532 PROPOSED
CPhm't�ri" i�L d krhE" i' Phone: 914.347.7500 SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES JOB NUMBER: DATE:
State of HY.=111, i.:MI Fax: 914.347.7266 WEEKDAY PEAK AM HIGHWAY HOUR 14001622A 1 1/13/2015
New JerseNew York Pennsylvania Virginia email: solutions @ maserconsulting.com (RESIDENTIAL-110 HOMES) FIGURE NUMBER:
y
Customer Loyalty through Client Satisfaction 16
KING STREET
(ROUTE 120A)
N
SITE EXECUTIVE INTERNATIONAL DRIVE
r
PARK 13—+ I
29—+
Ln
ANDERSON HILL ROAD
7 T
o�
KING STREET
(ROUTE 120A)
NOTE:LINE DIAGRAM NOT TO SCALE
p--Ri-_ SUN HOMES @ RECKSON EXECUTIVE PARK
WESTCHESTER OFFICE RYE BROOK.NEW YORK
T 1 i . > � �r, .a +.,. 11 Bradhurst Avenue O
ConsWoo,frwlco A fhwormental Engineers Hawthorne, NY 10532 PROPOSED
NmRws•Sw+e I LWcope Architects Phone: 914.347.7500 SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES JOB NUMBER PATE:
sloleo!N.Y.Cxiifcale of Authonzotion:0000172 Fax: 914.347.7266 WEEKDAY PEAK PM HIGHWAY HOUR 14001622A 1 1/13/2015
New Pennsylvania Virginia
email: solutions @ maserconsulting.com (RESIDENTIAL-110 HOMES) FIGURE NUMBER:
IN' New York
Customer Loyalty through Client Sallsfac0on 17
KING STREET
(ROUTE 120A)
�0
SITE ExEc SON INTERNATIONAL DRIVE
PARK 30 01
78 -
N
Ln M
O 0
ANDERSON HILL ROAD
153 nro1
12900
,2 -
KING STREET
(ROUTE 120A)
NOTE:LINE DIAGRAM NOTTO SCALE
,� SUN HOMES @ RECKSON EXECUTIVE PARK
MA&aWESTCHESTER OFFICE RYE BROOK,NEW YORK
r u m , 11 Bradhurst Avenue O
Hawthorne, NY 10532
Consulting,Municipal k Environmental Engineers YEAR 2019 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES
Planners•Surveyors ficate Landscape Architects Phone: 91.347. 266 WEEKDAY PEAK AM HIGHWAY HOUR JOB NUMBER: DATE:
Stale of N.Y.Certificate of Authorization:0000172 FOX: 914.347.7266 14001622A 1 1/13/2015
New Jersey New York Pennsylvania Virginia email: solutions 0 moserconsulting.com (W/PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL-110 HOMES) FIGURE NUMBER:
Customer Loyalty through Client Satisfaction 18_
KING STREET
(ROUTE 120A)
SITE EXECUTIVE INTERNATIONAL DRIVE 41
PARK 140
000
325 00 N
Q0
000
N�
ANDERSON HILL ROAD *
98--+
217—+ "' D0
� Ln
KING STREET
(ROUTE 120A)
NOTE:LINE DIAGRAM NOT TO SCALE
SUN HOMES @ RECKSON EXECUTIVE PARK
WESTCHESTER OFFICE RYE BROOK.NEW YORK O
11 Bradhurst Avenue
Cw Wtieg Munko A Env+tementol Engineers Hawthorne, NY 10532 YEAR 2019 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES
PHmm•Sarrre�yypprs•Lm&cope Architects Phone: 914.347.7500 WEEKDAY PEAK PM HIGHWAY HOUR "'-'t' NUMBER: DATE:
Stale al H.Y.C'brj to o1 Aulhonzation:0000172 Fax: 914.347.7266 14001622A 1 1/13/2015
New
email: solutions @ maserconsulting.com (W/PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL-110 HOMES) FIGURE NUMBER:
Je
rsey New York Pennsylvania Virginia
Customer Loyalty through Client Satisfaction 19
Traffic Impact Study
■ Sun Homes at Reckson Executive Park
MASER MC Project No.: 14001622A
E 1 N f 1 l T I X i F. A Appendix
S UN HOMES A T RECKSON EXE CUTI VE PARK
APPENDIX B
TABLES
N
w
2 o
} N
Q m F;::7 F N;cel F W m 01 5 (Y N N�F � (O N m m Oi�O u] �N Oi m U Of O�m N N M
O Y �W m y N y m y N y W N.�..,m M V V N N m C N y m m N_
`W a m¢QUaUowo U maQUam❑wo U aQQm<xamm m aaamamUmU m Q
0=3 D
mz
r Q
z
m w
N cn
N W
Q K
LU 0
}
}W a p�M t^n r N N m ^ d N O M O^7; 0 0 r O t0 T N F N
N❑ M O !p m F N V W O til fp V F'
aY Q _a_6;!.r_,N .N-.N. W n n_1�:N V M N 4i V L. !
Ow
a m m m a m❑❑O m a a Q m a m❑❑O m m a¢m a m O m m m ¢a¢m a m❑m U ¢
a
3
w} _
LL❑ N O F�'N E N S FF omp N M t0 I7 N i0 N<O cn Q m til m om;Of(O O�m til I7 d aD N V F7 C tai Oppp {�
LL YLU fL LL-_E a N M N�; 2 r r W M �r$_�. ^ .Or N N.m m.V V I0 l+l W 1�N��N�u N
❑Ow Uamwaoowo o wamo<uoww U ammUQm❑❑O U mmmUaUU❑U U
J_cn
O (n
m O z
.0 O
o F
N N U
<o w
W m
Q w
_ W
}�¢ �r(y VO^��mm 01 �C1O V N�.^-N V m °0rt�l�mu7 Olr fp M�^F'm fO fAM OIF m Z
LL Y� �ONOiNr W Mt0 til u'W yyO W t0 til O p W NI�Mt+IO h h Omt�I I�OOtD�� �p
a w Q N._..r..-. a O O �V W N f0 N.J �. c7 .r_. `. .�VIE
a W a U U m a m❑0 0 U a m m m a m W W W U LL a W m a m U m m W o a 0 m O❑U U U >
3� m
a
w
x
r
O
LL
^WN � . Z0EiNm � O
O❑d m L- Vr,PW M .
mJ3
aQ¢UaUowo U m a¢U a m U w o m QQamQmUQm m aa¢mQm❑mU m w
7 Z
� m
} 0 3Z
a w
0
0 N W
J
Z N a} U
moiq^mono F' m VE76F U' F' so^ ^en min v> W^mo F7 x
J U_ } O� O� ttpp ROtA N W Q�W F' O>O�F'^N N W
m > YQ EEL W.`_.!V V u �.ag�.r'2EES r �Ofp������ .�'.. �m >O
F N 3 Qm¢mam❑oo m QQamam❑oo m ma¢mamUmm a aa¢mQmomU ¢ Q
LL w
O U
J >
W LL
W
J m
O
N ap�tD W^�V IDr m �NNS NO�O)tp W W
Ya P ^ liilfiiiif G iliilliil i W
Zw aaamam❑❑o m aaaaaa°mm ¢ w
F� x
On r
X F
w Z
w
N w
X
aW a
Tp womrnooi�mF' R F'�ov�coinornio m
w¢ �������a$ Ilililll ����c���mlllll
aaamam000 m aaama¢°mm ¢ m
a
LU
M:
r
Y
Q
a
¢ =x= x x z Z =xx x x z QW xx= x z z =mm x x z
N°a r°va°ra r� O ° r°a°ra ry 4 �w r°vqq°ra r< O ° r°a°ra ry 4
O LL�pOSOLLS F, r LL0O5x �xQ r LLDODxOri=O r r LLOO�xOLLxO r
W X W OMOO9mwO m U wORRO EWL02 U wz W O W OO¢WO) U w0OOOOLTO U
Z r J ❑ J M a LL'LY d J R w J K aa X J_K r O ❑ J a fY[C J_¢ W J W.LL�(Y J- W
p O J N ❑F a F o a❑ d N ❑=2= d fY LL 7 m W o 2 x fY d y ❑=a x m
O= Z ¢ z¢z0¢ w F zr¢rzoz❑¢ OY N ZrndrZaZ❑¢ F zr¢rZ �❑¢
1 �z Q 'Z❑OZOo0jO r a �❑Oo�07Zo r WO J Donn W a D❑OOOODZO W
U Z ° Z OZO Z z ° pzZZOZO�z Z w a °�zZOZO�z ri_ ° 0zzzOZOOZ Z
r O m ]O m�m°] J m>> m m° w Z m m m°> > > O
0 w w O S O p U x m r m J Q S O p O=8 r m J W (9 x O p°x F.002 J Q m p°°m p r m
LL,W m �mm°=°r NNm J Z rmmmrmmmm J X> m rm mr tn� J Z Fmmmrmmmm
r❑ p r F r O x W W r C7 F H J x W W r r LL O F F r❑ W W r F r❑S W W r
mZ Z���or33w m Z�,Do533m m❑ Z��00�3z�m m ZX,Do�33�n
0< opo 8 � opo p � C7J Opo � � Opo p
Z zZm rn 3 0 3 zz N o z_a zZm W O 3 zZfn m o
Y Y O
F
z
0� ¢
W N
r N
Z W
O
O
V
r N U
Traffic Impact Study
■ Sun Homes at Reckson Executive Park
MASER MC Project No.: 14001622A
C O N f I l T I M C F. A. Appendix
SUN HOMES A T RECKSON EXECUTIVE PARK
APPENDIX C
LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS
Traffic Impact Study
4T9 Sun Homes at Reckson Executive Park
MASER MC Project No.: 14001622A
C I M f Y l T I M C F. A. Appendix
LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS
LEVEL OF SERVICE FOR SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
Level of Service (LOS) can be characterized for the entire intersection, each intersection
approach, and each lane group. Control delay alone is used to characterize LOS for the entire
intersection or an approach. Control delay and volume-to-capacity (v/c) ratio are used to
characterize LOS for a lane group. Delay quantifies the increase in travel time due to traffic
signal control. It is also a measure of driver discomfort and fuel consumption. The volume-to-
capacity ratio quantifies the degree to which a phase's capacity is utilized by a lane group.
LOS A describes operations with a control delay of 10 s/veh or less and a volume-to-capacity
ratio no greater than 1.0. This level is typically assigned when the volume-to-capacity ratio is
low and either progression is exceptionally favorable or the cycle length is very short. If it is due
to favorable progression, most vehicles arrive during the green indication and travel through the
intersection without stopping.
LOS B describes operations with control delay between 10 and 20 s/veh and a volume-to-
capacity ratio no greater than 1.0. This level is typically assigned when the volume-to-capacity
ratio is low and either progression is highly favorable or the cycle length is short. More vehicles
stop than with LOS A.
LOS C describes operations with control delay between 20 and 35 s/veh and a volume-to-
capacity ratio no greater than 1.0. This level is typically assigned when progression is favorable
or the cycle length is moderate.
LOS D describes operations with control delay between 35 and 55 s/veh and a volume-to-
capacity ratio no greater than 1.0. This level is typically assigned when the volume-to-capacity
ratio is high and either progression is ineffective or the cycle length is long.
Traffic Impact Study
■ Sun Homes at Reckson Executive Park
1v1AS E R MC Project No.: 14001622A
C O M f Y l T I N i P, A. Appendix
LOS E describes operations with control delay between 55 and 80 s/veh and a volume-to-
capacity ratio no greater than 1.0. This level is typically assigned when the volume-to-capacity
ratio is high,progression is unfavorable, and the cycle length is long.
LOS F describes operations with control delay exceeding 80 s/veh or a volume-to-capacity ratio
greater than 1.0. This level is typically assigned when the volume-to-capacity ratio is very high,
progression is very poor, and the cycle length is long.
A lane group can incur a delay less than 80 s/veh when the volume-to-capacity ratio exceeds 1.0.
This condition typically occurs when the cycle length is short, the signal progression is
favorable, or both. As a result, both the delay and volume-to-capacity ratio are considered when
lane group LOS is established. A ratio of 1.0 or more indicates that cycle capacity is fully
utilized and represents failure from a capacity perspective (just as delay in excess of 80 s/veh
represents failure from a delay perspective).
The Level of Service Criteria for signalized intersections are given in Exhibit 18-4 from the 2010
Highway Capacity Manual published by the Transportation Research Board.
Exhibit 18-4
LOS by Volume-to-Capacity Ratio
Control Delay (s/veh) v/c g.0 v/c>1.0
g0 A F
>10-20 B F
>20-35 C F
>35-55 D F
>55-80 E F
>80 F F
For approach-based and intersection wide assessments, LOS is defined solely by control delay.
Traffic Impact Study
r Sun Homes at Reckson Executive Park
MASER MC Project No.: 14001622A
E I M I I L T I X C P. A. Appendix
SUN HOMES A T RECKSON EXE CUTI VE PARK
APPENDIX D
CAPACITY ANALYSIS
YEAR 2014 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES WEEKDAY PEAK AM HIGHWAY HOUR
1: ANDERSON HILL ROAD & KING STREET 1202 12/18/2014
T 1
E
Lane Configurations t t r
Volume(vph) 121 660 575 86 118 117
Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length(ft) 75 200 250 0
Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1
Taper Length(ft) 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Ped Bike Factor 100 0.98 0.95
Frt 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow(prot) 1719 1810 1810 1538 1719 1538
Flt Permitted 0.287 0.950
Satd. Flow(perm) 518 1810 1810 1538 1676 1464
Right Tum on Red No No
Satd. Flow(RTOR)
Link Speed(mph) 35 35 30
Link Distance(ft) 1256 2649 2715
Travel Time(s) 24.5 51.6 61.7
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10
Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89
Heavy Vehicles(%) 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5%
Adj. Flow(vph) 136 742 646 97 133 131
Shared Lane Traffic(%)
Lane Group Flow(vph) 136 742 646 97 133 131
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Left Left Right Left Right
Median Width(ft) 12 12 12
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Turning Speed(mph) 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 1 1 1 1 1 1
Detector Template
Leading Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50
Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50
Detector 1 Type Cif Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex
Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Queue(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Turn Type pm+pt NA NA pt+ov Prot Perm
Protected Phases 1 6 2 24 4 3
Permitted Phases 6 4
Detector Phase 1 6 2 24 4 4
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
14001622A AMEX Synchro 8 Report
Page 1
YEAR 2014 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES WEEKDAY PEAK AM HIGHWAY HOUR
1: ANDERSON HILL ROAD & KING STREET 120A 12/18/2014
*1 t ►� i
Minimum Split(s) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 20.0
Total Split(s) 15.0 75.0 60.0 25.0 25.0 20.0
Total Split(%) 12.5% 62.5% 50.0% 20.8% 20.8% 17%
Maximum Green(s) 10.0 70.0 55.0 20.0 20.0 18.0
Yellow Time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4,0 2.0
All-Red Time(s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Lost Time Adjust(s) -1.0 -1,0 -1.0 -1,0 -1.0
Total Lost Time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead JUNO ,110
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 I
Recall Mode None Max Max None None None
Walk Time(s) 5.0
Flash Dont Walk(s) 11.0
Pedestrian Calls(#/hr) 0
Act Effct Green(s) 71.1 71.1 58.4 77.0 14.6 14.6
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.76 0.76 0,62 0.82 0.16 0.16
v/c Ratio 0.27 0.54 0.57 0.08 0.50 0.58
Control Delay 4.8 7.0 13.9 1.8 42.6 46.9
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 4.8 7.0 13.9 1.8 42.6 46.9
LOS A A B A D D
Approach Delay 6.6 12.3 44,7
Approach LOS A B D
Queue Length 50th (ft) 17 146 204 8 73 73
Queue Length 95th(ft) 40 278 368 17 128 129
Internal Link Dist(ft) 1176 2569 2635
Turn Bay Length(ft) 75 200 250
Base Capacity(vph) 534 1373 1128 1369 385 328
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.25 054 0.57 0.07 0.35 0.40
�n1!ersecbo�
Area Type: Olher
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length:93.7
Natural Cycle:75
Control Type:Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio:0.58
Intersection Signal Delay: 14.2 Intersection LOS: B
Intersection Capacity Utilization 53.5% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period(min) 15
Splits and Phases: 1:ANDERSON HILL ROAD&KING STREET(1 20A) �}
41 4 42 k_3 ! 04
t06
r75 S !_A.
Page 2
YEAR 2014 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES WEEKDAY PEAK AM HIGHWAY HOUR
2: INTERNATIONAL DRIVE & KING STREET 120A 12/1812014
liz
Lane Configurations +
Volume(vph) 609 46 112 649 2 11
Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length(ft) 325 450 250 0
Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1
Taper Length(ft) 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Ped Bike Factor 0.97 1.00 0.98 0.96
Frt 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow(prot) 1810 1538 1719 1810 1719 1538
Flt Permitted 0.287 0.950
Satd. Flow(perm) 1810 1497 518 1810 1684 1477
Right Tum on Red No Yes
Satd. Flow(RTOR) 12
Link Speed(mph) 35 35 30
Link Distance(ft) 1949 2649 1520
Travel Time(s) 38.0 51.6 34.5
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10
Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 ;
Heavy Vehicles(%) 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5%
Adj. Flow(vph) 684 52 126 729 2 12
Shared Lane Traffic(%)
Lane Group Flow(vph) 684 52 126 729 2 12
Enter Blocked Intersection No NO No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right
Median Width(ft) 12 12 12
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Turning Speed(mph) 9 15 15 9
Number of Detectors 0 0 1 0 1 1
Detector Template
Leading Detector(ft) 0 0 50 0 50 50
Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50
Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex
Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Queue(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Tum Type NA pm+ov pm+pt NA Prot Perm
Protected Phases 2 3 1 6 3
Permitted Phases 2 6 3
Detector Phase 2 3 1 6 3 3
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial(s) 5.0 3.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
14001622A AMEX Synchro 8 Report
Page 3
YEAR 2014 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES WEEKDAY PEAK AM HIGHWAY HOUR
2: INTERNATIONAL DRIVE & KING STREET 120A 12/18/2014
Minimum Split(s) 11.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 9.0 9.0
Total Split(s) 46.0 25.0 14.0 60.0 25.0 25.0
Total Split(%) 54.1% 29.4% 16.5% 70,6% 29,4% 29,4%
Maximum Green(s) 40.0 20.0 8.0 54.0 20.0 7.0.0
Yellow Time(s) 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4,C
All-Red Time(s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1,0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust(s) -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0
Total Lost Time(s) 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0
Lead/Lag Lag Lead
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension(s) 0.2 3.0 3.0 0.2 3.0 3.0
Recall Mode Max None None Max None None
Act Effct Green(s) 48.6 54.4 58.1 60.2 6.9 6.9
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.70 0.78 0.83 0.86 0.10 0.10
v/c Ratio 0.54 0,04 0,22 0,47 0.01 0.08
Control Delay 10.1 2.3 2.7 3.5 29.0 16.9
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0
Total Delay 10.1 2.3 2.7 3.5 29.0 16.9
LOS B A A A C B
Approach Delay 9.5 3.4 18.6
Approach LOS A A B
Queue Length 50th(ft) 170 4 9 82 1 0
Queue Length 95th(ft) 294 11 20 143 7 14� ..
Internal Link Dist(ft) 1869 7.569 1440
Turn Bay Length(ft) 325 450 250
Base Capacity(vph) 1262 1380 587 1564 521 456
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.54 0.04 0.21 0.47 0.00 0.03
E
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length:85
Actuated Cycle Length: 69.7
Natural Cycle:50
Control Type: Semi Act-Uncoord
Maximum v/c Ratio:0.54
Intersection Signal Delay: 6.3 Intersection LOS:A
Intersection Capacity Utilization 53.3% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period(min) 15
Splits and Phases: 2: INTERNATIONAL DRIVE&KING STREET 120A
X"01 02 03
14s . 25s
6
14001622A AMEX Synchro 8 Report
Page 4
YEAR 2014 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES WEEKDAY PEAK PM HIGHWAY HOUR
1: ANDERSON HILL ROAD & KING STREET 120A 12/18/2014
t
Lane Configurations t T r
Volume(vph) 123 471 571 88 79 197
Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft) 75 200 250 0
Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1
Taper Length(ft) 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Ped Bike Factor 1.00 0.98 0.95
Frt 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow(prot) 1719 1810 1810 1538 1719 1538
Flt Permitted 0.267 0.950
Satd. Flow(perm) 482 1810 1810 1538 1676 1464
Right Tum on Red No No
Satd. Flow(RTOR)
Link Speed(mph) 35 35 30
Link Distance(ft) 1256 2649 2715
Travel Time(s) 24.5 51.6 61.7
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10
Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89
Heavy Vehicles(%) 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5%
Adj.Flow(vph) 138 529 642 99 89 221
Shared Lane Traffic(%)
Lane Group Flow(vph) 138 529 642 99 89 22'
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Left Left Right Left Right
Median Width(ft) 12 12 12
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Turning Speed(mph) 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 1 1 1 1 1 1
Detector Template
Leading Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50
Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50
Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex
Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Queue(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Turn Type pm+pt NA NA pt+ov Prot Perm
Protected Phases 1 6 2 24 4 3
Permitted Phases 6 4
Detector Phase 1 6 2 2 4 '+ 4
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial(s) 4.0 4.0 ;1.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
14001622A PMEX Synchro 8 Report
Page 1
YEAR 2014 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES WEEKDAY PEAK PM HIGHWAY HOUR
1: ANDERSON HILL ROAD & KING STREET 120A) 12/18/2014
t l
Minimum Split(s) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 20.0
Total Split(s) 15.0 75.0 60.0 25.0 25.0 20.0
Total Split(%) 12.5% 62.5% 50.0% 20.8% 20.8% 17%
Maximum Green(s) 10.0 70.0 55.0 20.0 20.0 18.0
Yellow Time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4,0 4.0 2.0
All-Red Time(s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Lost Time Adjust(s) -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1,0
Total Lost Time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension(s) 3.0 3.0 3,0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Recall Mode None Max Max None None None
Walk Time(s) 5.0
Flash Dont Walk(s) 11.0
Pedestrian Calls(#/hr) 0
Act Effct Green(s) 71.0 71.0 58.0 81.8 19.8 19.8
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.72 0.72 0.59 0.83 0.20 0,20
v/c Ratio 0.30 0.41 0.60 0.08 0.26 0.75
Control Delay 6.2 6.8 16.6 1.8 35.4 54.6 41
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 6.2 6.8 16.6 1.8 35.4 54.6
LOS A A B A D D
Approach Delay 6.7 14.7 49.1
Approach LOS A B D
Queue Length 50th(ft) 24 120 249 8 48 132
Queue Length 95th(ft) 42 171 371 17 91 #233
Internal Link Dist(ft) 1176 2569 2635
Turn Bay Length(ft) 75 200 250
Base Capacity(vph) 484 1301 1062 1292 365 311
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.29 0.41 0.60 0.08 0.24 0.71
- -nOFW In 11 M
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length:98.8
Natural Cycle:90
Control Type:Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio:0.75
Intersection Signal Delay: 17.8 Intersection LOS:B
Intersection Capacity Utilization 51.2% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period(min) 15
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity,queue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Splits and Phases: 1:ANDERSON HILL ROAD&KING STREET(120A) `
X) 01 023
15s 1 LANs 1 125S
t06
YEAR 2014 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES WEEKDAY PEAK PM HIGHWAY HOUR
2: INTERNATIONAL DRIVE & KING STREET 120A 12/18/2014
Lane Configurations t r T
Volume(vph) 522 6 9 564 64 147
Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length(ft) 325 450 250 0
Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1
Taper Length(ft) 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Ped Bike Factor 0.97 1.00 0.98 0.96
Frt 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow(prot) 1810 1538 1719 1810 1719 1538
Flt Permitted 0.348 0.950
Satd. Flow(perm) 1810 1497 628 1810 1684 1477
Right Tum on Red No Yes
Satd. Flow(RTOR) 165
Link Speed(mph) 35 35 30
Link Distance(ft) 1949 2649 1520
Travel Time(s) 38.0 51.6 34.5
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10
Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89
Heavy Vehicles(%) 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5%
Adj. Flow(vph) 587 7 10 634 72 165
Shared Lane Traffic(%)
Lane Group Flow(vph) 587 7 10 634 72 165
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right
Median Width(ft) 12 12 12
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Turning Speed(mph) 9 15 15 9
Number of Detectors 0 0 1 0 1 1
Detector Template
Leading Detector(ft) 0 0 50 0 50 50
Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50
Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex
Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Queue(s) 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Delay(s) 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Turn Type NA pm+ov pm+pt NA Prot Perm
Protected Phases 2 3 1 6 3
Permitted Phases 2 6 3
Detector Phase 2 3 1 6 3 3
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial(s) 5.0 3.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
14001622A PMEX Synchro 8 Report
Page 3
YEAR 2014 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES WEEKDAY PEAK PM HIGHWAY HOUR
2: INTERNATIONAL DRIVE & KING STREET (120A) 1211812014
Minimum Split(s) 11.0 9.0 10-0 11.0 9,0 9.0
Total Split(s) 46.0 25.0 14.0 60.0 25.0 25.0
Total Split(%) 54.1% 29.4% 16.5% 70.6% 29.4% 29.4%
Maximum Green(s) 40.0 20.0 8.0 54.0 20.0 20.0
Yellow Time(s) 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0
All-Red Time(s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust(s) -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1,0 -1,0
Total Lost Time(s) 5-0 4.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0
Lead/Lag Lag Lead
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension (s) 0.2 3.0 3.0 0.2 3.0 3.0
Recall Mode Max None None Max None None
Act Effct Green(s) 52.8 63.2 55.1 55,1 9.4 9.4
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.72 0.86 0.75 0.75 0.13 0.13
v/c Ratio 0.45 0.01 0.02 0.47 0.33 0.50
Control Delay 7.1 1.2 2.9 5.2 33.1 10.9
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 7.1 1.2 2.9 5.2 33.1 10.9
LOS A A A A C B
Approach Delay 7.0 5.2 17.6
Approach LOS A A B
Queue Length 50th(ft) 75 0 1 84 30 0
Queue Length 95th(ft) 254 2 5 161 66 48
Internal Link Dist(ft) 1869 2569 1440
Turn Bay Length(ft) 325 450 250
Base Capacity(vph) 1299 1397 604 1355 491 540
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn C. 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 045 0.01 0.02 0.47 0.15 0.31
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length:85
Actuated Cycle Length:73.5
Natural Cycle:50
Control Type: Semi Act-Uncoord
Maximum v/c Ratio:0.50
Intersection Signal Delay:7.9 Intersection LOS:A
Intersection Capacity Utilization 45.1% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period(min) 15
Splits and Phases: 2: INTERNATIONAL DRIVE&KING STREET(120A
0`01 cfZ 03
14s 'i6 s - 25 s
\b'
14001622A PMEX Synchro 8 Report
Page 4
YEAR 2019 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES WEEKDAY PEAK AM HIGHWAY HOUR
1: ANDERSON HILL ROAD & KING STREET 120A 1/13/2015
Lane Configurations t t
Volume(vph) 133 853 650 98 151 129
Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length(ft) 75 200 250 0
Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1
Taper Length(ft) 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Ped Bike Factor 1.00 0.98 0.95
Frt 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow(prot) 1719 1810 1810 1538 1719 1538
Flt Permitted 0.232 0.950
Satd. Flow(perm) 419 1810 1810 1538 1677 1464
Right Tum on Red No No
Satd. Flow(RTOR)
Link Speed(mph) 35 35 30
Link Distance(ft) 1256 2649 2715
Travel Time(s) 24.5 51.6 61.7
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10
Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89
Heavy Vehicles(%) 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5%
Adj.Flow(vph) 149 958 730 110 170 145
Shared Lane Traffic(%)
Lane Group Flow(vph) 149 958 730 1:10 170 145
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Left Left Right Left Right
Median Width(ft) 12 12 12
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 100
Turning Speed(mph) 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 1 1 1 1 1 1
Detector Template
Leading Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50
Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50
Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex
Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Queue(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Turn Type pm+pt NA NA pt+ov Prot Perm
Protected Phases 1 6 2 24 4 3
Permitted Phases 6 4
Detector Phase 1 6 2 24 4 4
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
14001622A AMNB Synchro 8 Report
Page 1
YEAR 2019 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES WEEKDAY PEAK AM HIGHWAY HOUR
1: ANDERSON HILL ROAD & KING STREET 120A 111312015
t
Minimum Split(s) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 20.0
Total Split(s) 15.0 75.0 60.0 25.0 25.0 20.0
Total Split(%) 12.5% 62,5% 50.0% 20.8% 20.8% 17%
Maximum Green(s) 10.0 70.0 55.0 20.0 20.0 18.0
Yellow Time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4,0 2.0
All-Red Time(s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Lost Time Adjust(s) -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1,0 -1,0
Total Lost Time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Recall Mode None Max Max None None None
Walk Time(s) 5.0
Flash Dont Walk(s) 11.0
Pedestrian Calls(#/hr) 0
Act Effct Green(s) 71.1 71.1 58.1 77.7 15.5 15.5
Actuated g1C Ratio 0.75 0.75 0.61 0.82 0.16 0.16
v1c Ratio 0.34 0.70 0.66 0.09 0.60 0.60
Control Delay 5.9 10.6 16.6 1.9 46.0 47.6
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 5.9 10.6 16.6 1.9 46.0 47.6
LOS A B B A D D
Approach Delay 10.0 14.6 46.7
Approach LOS A B D
Queue Length 50th(ft) 20 248 259 9 96 82
Queue Length 95th(ft) 44 475 459 20 160 142
Internal Link Dist(ft) 1176 2569 2635
Turn Bay Length(ft) 75 200 250
Base Capacity(vph) 466 1359 11 l 1 1350 381 325
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.32 C-.70 0.66 0.08 0.45 0.45
rot 11 - Ill{ .. .�;,t- , ry i- -r, .■
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length:94.7
Natural Cycle:90
Control Type:Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum vfc Ratio:0.70
Intersection Signal Delay: 16.8 Intersection LOS:B
Intersection Capacity Utilization 59.9% ICU Level of Service B
Analysis Period(min) 15
Splits and Phases: 1:ANDERSON HILL ROAD&KING STREET(120A)
of � d2 � 3 � % u•r
15s 60s 2ps
t06 25s
r Page 2
YEAR 2019 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES WEEKDAY PEAK AM HIGHWAY HOUR
2: INTERNATIONAL DRIVE & KING STREET 120A 1/13/2015
Lane Configurations '� T
Volume(vph) 670 114 271 714 11 32
Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length(ft) 325 450 250 0
Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1
Taper Length(ft) 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Ped Bike Factor 0.97 1.00 0.98 0.96
Frt 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 _
Satd. Flow(prot) 1810 1538 1719 1810 1719 1538
Flt Permitted 0.209 0.950
Satd. Flow(perm) 1810 1497 377 1810 1684 1477
Right Tum on Red No Yes
Satd. Flow(RTOR) 36
Link Speed(mph) 35 35 30
Link Distance(ft) 1949 2649 1520
Travel Time(s) 38.0 51.6 34.5
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10
Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89
Heavy Vehicles(%) 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5%
Adj. Flow(vph) 753 128 304 802 12 36
Shared Lane Traffic(%)
Lane Group Flow(vph) 753 128 304 802 -,2 36 _
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right .
Median Width(ft) 12 12 12
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Turning Speed(mph) 9 15 15 9
Number of Detectors 0 0 1 0 1 1
Detector Template
Leading Detector(ft) 0 0 50 0 50 50
Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50
Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex
Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Queue(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Turn Type NA pm+ov pm+pt NA Prot Perm
Protected Phases 2 3 1 6 3
Permitted Phases 2 6 3
Detector Phase 2 3 1 6 3 3
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial(s) 5.0 3.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
14001622A AMNB Synchro 8 Report
Page 3
YEAR 2019 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES WEEKDAY PEAK AM HIGHWAY HOUR
2: INTERNATIONAL DRIVE & KING STREET 120A 1/1312015
Minimum Split(s) 11.0 9,0 10.0 11.0 9.0 9,0
Total Split(s) 46.0 25.0 14.0 60.0 25.0 25.0
Total Split(%) 54.1% 29.4% 16.5% 70,6% 29.4% 29.4%
Maximum Green(s) 40.0 20.0 8.0 54.0 20.0 20.0
Yellow Time(s) 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0
All-Red Time(s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Last Time Adjust(s) -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1,0 -1.0
Total Lost Time(s) 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0
Lead/Lag Lag Lead
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension(s) 0.2 3.0 3,0 0.2 3.0 3,0
Recall Mode Max None None Max None None
Act Effct Green(s) 41.2 49.5 55.3 56.4 7.3 7.3
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.60 0.72 0.80 0.82 0.11 0.11
v/c Ratio 0.70 0.12 0.64 0.54 0.07 0.19 �ax�
Control Delay 15.1 2.8 10.6 4.8 29.6 13.5
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 15.1 2.8 10.6 4.8 29.6 13.5
LOS B A B A C B
Approach Delay 13.3 6.4 17.5
Approach LOS B A B
Queue Length 50th(ft) 214 12 25 99 5 0
Queue Length 95th(ft) 361 23 82 187 19 24 R_
Internal Link Dist(ft) 1869 2569 1440
Turn Bay Length (ft) 325 450 250
Base Capacity(vph) 1077 1347 476 1476 524 475
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.70 0.10 0.64 0.54 0.02 0.08
1'n�caeciwri'
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length:85
Actuated Cycle Length:69.2
Natural Cycle:60
Control Type: Semi Act-Uncoord
Maximum v/c Ratio:0.70
Intersection Signal Delay:9.7 Intersection LOS:A
Intersection Capacity Utilization 65.3% ICU Level of Service C
Analysis Period(min) 15
Splits and Phases: 2: INTERNATIONAL DRIVE&KING STREET(120A)
A,-'01 N 02 03
1�s 46s s
14001622A AMNB Synchro 8 Report
Page 4
YEAR 2019 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES WEEKDAY PEAK PM HIGHWAY HOUR
1: ANDERSON HILL ROAD & KING STREET (120A) 1/13/2015
Lane Configurations t t r
Volume(vph) 135 541 743 116 91 217
Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length(ft) 75 200 250 0
Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1
Taper Length(ft) 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Ped Bike Factor 1.00 0.98 0.95
Frt 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow(prot) 1719 1810 1810 1538 1719 1538
Flt Permitted 0.138 0.950
Satd. Flow(perm) 249 1810 1810 1538 1678 1464
Right Tum on Red No No
Satd. Flow(RTOR)
Link Speed(mph) 35 35 30
Link Distance(ft) 1256 2649 2715
Travel Time(s) 24.5 51.6 61.7
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10
Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89
Heavy Vehicles(%) 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5%
Adj. Flow(vph) 152 608 835 130 102 244
Shared Lane Traffic(%)
Lane Group Flow(vph) 152 608 835 130 102 244
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Left Left Right Left Right
Median Width(ft) 12 12 12
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 100
Turning Speed(mph) 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 1
Detector Template
Leading Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50
Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50
Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Ci+Ex CI+Ex
Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Queue(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Tum Type pm+pt NA NA pt+ov Prot Perm
Protected Phases 1 6 2 24 4 3
Permitted Phases 6 4
Detector Phase 1 6 2 24 4 4
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
14001622A PMNB Synchro 8 Report
Page 1
YEAR 2019 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES WEEKDAY PEAK PM HIGHWAY HOUR
1: ANDERSON HILL ROAD & KING STREET (120A) 111312015
,0) t
-
Minimum Split(s) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 20.0
Total Split(s) 15.0 75.0 60.0 25.0 25.0 20.0
Total Split(%) 12.5% 62.5% 50.0% 20.8% 20.8% 17%
Maximum Green (s) 10.0 70.0 55.0 20.0 20.0 18.0
Yellow Time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 2.0
All-Red Time(s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Lost Time Adjust(s) -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0
Total Lost Time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Recall Mode None Max Max None None None
Walk Time(s) 5.0
Flash Dont Walk(s) 11.0
Pedestrian Calls(#/hr) 0
Act Effct Green(s) 71.0 71.0 57.0 81.9 20.9 20.9
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.71 0.71 0.57 0.82 0.21 0.21
vlc Ratio 0.47 0.47 0.81 0.10 0.28 0.80
Control Delay 9.5 7.8 25.2 2.1 35.8 58.1
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 9.5 7.8 25.2 2.1 35.8 58.1
LOS A A C A D E
Approach Delay 8.1 22.1 51.5
Approach LOS A C D
Queue Length 50th (ft) 27 146 408 13 55 149
Queue Length 95th(ft) 45 208 586 23 102 #267
Internal Link Dist(ft) 1176 2569 2635
Turn Bay Length(ft) 75 200 250
Base Capacity(vph) 338 1286 1033 1262 361 307
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced vlc Ratio 0.45 0.47 0.81 0,10 0.28 0.79
.mss - - _ EE_
t��SBG'Ii;Or��R'IA1 .������+� •sm : .�i-, :;.�';.�y.��--
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length:99.9
Natural Cycle:90
Control Type:Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum vlc Ratio:0.81
Intersection Signal Delay:21.9 Intersection LOS:C
Intersection Capacity Utilization 61.6% ICU Level of Service B
Analysis Period(min) 15
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity,queue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Splits and Phases: 1:ANDERSON HILL ROAD&KING STREET(120A)
A) vl 02 a3 7 4
155 60s -
t0606
YEAR 2019 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES WEEKDAY PEAK PM HIGHWAY HOUR
2: INTERNATIONAL DRIVE & KING STREET (120A) 1/13/2015
Lane Configurations t r t
Volume(vph) 574 19 37 620 127 296
Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length(ft) 325 450 250 0
Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1
Taper Length(ft) 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Ped Bike Factor 0.97 1.00 0.98 0.96
Frt 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow(prot) 1810 1538 1719 1810 1719 1538
Flt Permitted 0.279 0.950
Satd. Flow(perm) 1810 1497 504 1810 1684 1477
Right Turn on Red No Yes
Satd. Flow(RTOR) 331
Link Speed(mph) 35 35 30
Link Distance(ft) 1949 2649 1520
Travel Time(s) 38.0 51.6 34.5
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10
Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89
Heavy Vehicles(%) 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5%
Adj.Flow(vph) 645 21 42 697 143 333
Shared Lane Traffic(%)
Lane Group Flow(vph) 645 21 42 697 143 333
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right
Median Width(ft) 12 12 12
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Turning Speed(mph) 9 15 15 9
Number of Detectors 0 0 1 0 1 1
Detector Template
Leading Detector(ft) 0 0 50 0 50 50
Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50
Detector 1 Type CI+Ex Ci+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex
Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Queue(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Tum Type NA pm+ov pm+pt NA Prot Perm
Protected Phases 2 3 1 6 3
Permitted Phases 2 6 3
Detector Phase 2 3 1 6 3 3
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial(s) 5.0 3.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
14001622A PMNB Synchro 8 Report
Page 3
YEAR 2019 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES WEEKDAY PEAK PM HIGHWAY HOUR
2: INTERNATIONAL DRIVE & KING STREET(120A) 1/13/2015
Minimum Split(s) 11.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 9.0 9.0
Total Split(s) 46.0 25.0 14.0 60.0 25.0 25.0
Total Split(%) 54.1% 29.4% 16.5% 70.6% 29.4% 29.4%
Maximum Green(s) 40.0 20.0 8.0 54.0 20.0 20.0
Yellow Time(s) 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0
All-Red Time(s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust(s) -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0
Total Lost Time(s) 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0
Lead/Lag Lag Lead
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension(s) 0.2 3.0 3.0 0.2 3.0 3.0
Recall Mode Max None None Max none None
Act Effct Green(s) 47.8 61.8 55.1 55.1 13.0 1.3.0
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.62 0.80 0.71 0.71 0.17 0.17
v/c Ratio 0.57 0.02 0.09 0.54 0.49 0.64
Control Delay 13.9 1.8 4.5 7.7 34.9 9.6
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 O.0 0.0
Total Delay 13.9 1.8 4.5 7.7 34.9 9.6
LOS B A A A C A
Approach Delay 13.5 7.5 17.2
Approach LOS B A 8
Queue Length 50th(ft) 192 2 5 123 63 1
Queue Length 95th(ft) 362 5 16 255 114 64
Internal Link Dist(ft) 1869 2569 1440
Turn Bay Length (ft) 325 450 250
Base Capacity(vph) 1123 1306 502 1293 469 643
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.57 0.02 008 0.54 0.30 0.52
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length:85
Actuated Cycle Length:77.1
Natural Cycle: 55
Control Type: Semi Act-Uncoord
Maximum v/c Ratio:0.64
Intersection Signal Delay: 12.1 Intersection LOS: B
Intersection Capacity Utilization 57.1% ICU Level of Service B
Analysis Period(min) 15
S lits and Phases: 2: INTERNATIONAL DRIVE&KING STREET(120A)
X36
14001622A PMNB Synchro 8 Report
Page 4
YEAR 2019 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES - APPROVED AM
1: ANDERSON HILL ROAD & KING STREET (120A) 1/13/2015
Lane Configurations t T r
Volume(vph) 133 1083 682 103 190 129
Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length(ft) 75 20.0 250 0
Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1
Taper Length(ft) 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Ped Bike Factor 1.00 0.98 0.95
Frt 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow(prot) 1719 1810 1810 1538 1719 1538
Flt Permitted 0.199 0.950
Satd. Flow(perm) 359 1810 1810 1538 1677 1464
Right Tum on Red No No
Satd. Flow(RTOR)
Link Speed(mph) 35 35 30
Link Distance(ft) 1256 2649 2715
Travel Time(s) 24.5 51.6 61.7
Confl. Peds.(#/hr) 10 10 10 10
Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89
Heavy Vehicles(%) 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5%
Adj.Flow(vph) 149 1217 766 116 213 145
Shared Lane Traffic(%)
Lane Group Flow(vph) 149 1.217 766 116 213 145
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Left Left Right Left Right
Median Width(ft) 12 12 12
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Turning Speed(mph) 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 1 1 1 1 1 1
Detector Template
Leading Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50
Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50
Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex
Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Queue(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Turn Type pm+pt NA NA pt+ov Prot Perm
Protected Phases 1 6 2 24 4 3
Permitted Phases 6 4
Detector Phase 1 6 2 24 4 4
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
14001622A AMBD APPROVED OFFICE-280,000 S.F. Synchro 8 Report
Page 1
YEAR 2019 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES - APPROVED AM
1: ANDERSON HILL ROAD & KING STREET (120A) 1/13/2015
t
Minimum Split(s) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9,0 20.0
Total Split(s) 15.0 75.0 60-0 25.0 25.0 20.0
Total Split(%) 12.5% 62.5% 50.0% 20.8% 20,8% 17%
Maximum Green(s) 10.0 70.0 55.0 20.0 20.0 18.0
Yellow Time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 2.0
All-Red Time(s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Lost Time Adjust(s) -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1,0 -1.0
Total Lost Time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Recall Mode None Max Max None None None
Walk Time(s) 5.0
Flash Dont Walk(s) 11.0
Pedestrian Calls(#/hr) 0
Act Effct Green(s) 71.1 71.1 57.6 79.3 17.6 17.6
Actuated g/C Ratio 0,74 0.74 0:60 0.82 0.18 0.18
v/c Ratio 0.38 0.92 0.71 0.09 0.68 0.54
Control Delay 6.9 24.1 19,4 2.0 48.5 43.8
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 6.9 24.1 19.4 2.0 48.5 43.8
LOS A C B A D D
Approach Delay 22.2 17.1 46.6
Approach LOS C B D
Queue Length 50th(ft) 23 528 314 10 123 82
Queue Length 95th(ft) 44 #996 499 21 198 142
Internal Link Dist(ft) 1176 2569 2635
Turn Bay Length(ft) 75 200 250
Base Capacity(vph) 418 1330 1078 1314 373 318
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.36 0.92 0.71 009 0-57 0.46
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length:96.7
Natural Cycle: 130
Control Type:Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio:0.92
Intersection Signal Delay:23.9 Intersection LOS:C
Intersection Capacity Utilization 74.2% ICU Level of Service D
Analysis Period(min)15
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity,queue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Splits and Phases: 1:ANDERSON HILL ROAD&KING STREET(120A)
til 02 04
75.5 1 1605 25s
t06
YEAR 2019 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES - APPROVED AM
2: INTERNATIONAL DRIVE & KING STREET (120A) 1113/2015
Lane Configurations T r T
Volume(vph) 670 229 540 714 27 69
Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length(ft) 325 450 250 0
Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1
Taper Length(ft) 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Ped Bike Factor 0.97 1.00 0.98 0.96
Frt 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow(prot) 1810 1538 1719 1810 1719 1538
Flt Permitted 0.194 0.950
Satd. Flow(perm) 1810 1497 350 1810 1684 1477
Right Tum on Red No Yes
Satd. Flow(RTOR) 78
Link Speed(mph) 35 35 30
Link Distance(ft) 1949 2649 1520
Travel Time(s) 38.0 51.6 34.5
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10
Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89
Heavy Vehicles(%) 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5%
Adj, Flow(vph) 753 257 607 802 30 78
Shared Lane Traffic(%)
Lane Group Flow(vph) 753 257 607 802 30 78
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right
Median Width(ft) 12 12 12
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Turning Speed(mph) 9 15 15 9
Number of Detectors 0 0 1 0 1 1
Detector Template
Leading Detector(ft) 0 0 50 0 50 50
Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50
Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex
Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend(s) 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Queue(s) 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 0:0 0.0
Detector 1 Delay(s) 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Turn Type NA pm+ov pm+pt NA Prot Perm
Protected Phases 2 3 1 6 3
Permitted Phases 2 6 3
Detector Phase 2 3 1 6 3 3
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial(s) 5.0 3.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
14001622A AMBD APPROVED OFFICE-280,000 S.F. Synchro 8 Report
Page 3
YEAR 2019 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES - APPROVED AM
2: INTERNATIONAL DRIVE & KING STREET (120A) 1/13/2015
Minimum Split(s) 11.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 9.0 9.0
Total Split(s) 46.0 25.0 14.0 60.0 25.0 25.0
Total Split(%) 54.1% 29.4% 16.5% 70.6% 29,4% 29.4%
Maximum Green(s) 40.0 20.0 8.0 54.0 20.0 20.0
Yellow Time(s) 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0
All-Red Time(s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust(s) -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0
Total Lost Time(s) 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0
Lead/Lag Lag Lead
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension(s) 0.2 3.0 3,0 0.2 3.0 3.0
Recall Mode Max None None Max None None
Act Effct Green(s) 41.0 50.2 55.0 55.0 8.2 8.2
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.57 0.70 0.76 0.76 0.11 0.11
v/c Ratio 0.73 0.25 1.39 0.58 0.15 0.33
Control Delay 17.3 3.5 206.0 6.0 30.5 11.9
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 17.3 3.5 206.0 6.0 30.5 11.9
LOS B A F A C B
Approach Delay 13.8 92.1 17.1
Approach LOS B F B
Queue Length 50th(ft) 220 26 -152 107 12 0
Queue Length 95th(ft) 391 44 #396 221 35 35
Internal Link Dist(ft) 1869 2569 1440
Turn Bay Length(ft) 325 450 250
Base Capacity(vph) 1028 1318 437 1379 500 484
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.73 0.19 1.39 0.58 0.06 0.16
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length:85
Actuated Cycle Length:72.2
Natural Cycle:90
Control Type: Semi Act-Uncoord
Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.39
Intersection Signal Delay:57.6 Intersection LOS: E
Intersection Capacity Utilization 80.2% ICU Level of Service D
Analysis Period(min) 15
- Volume exceeds capacity,queue is theoretically infinite.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity,queue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Splits and Phases: 2: INTERNATIONAL DRIVE&KING STREET(120A
All-01 02 � 0.3
6
YEAR 2019 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES - APPROVED PM
1: ANDERSON HILL ROAD & KING STREET 120A 1/13/2015
-`1 ri
Lane Configurations t t r
Volume(vph) 135 583 951 151 98 217
Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length(ft) 75 200 250 0
Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1
Taper Length(ft) 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Ped Bike Factor 1.00 0.98 0.95
Frt 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow(prot) 1719 1810 1810 1538 1719 1538
Flt Permitted 0.066 0.950
Satd. Flow(perm) 119 1810 1810 1538 1680 1464
Right Tum on Red No No
Satd. Flow(RTOR)
Link Speed(mph) 35 35 30
Link Distance(ft) 1256 2649 2715
Travel Time(s) 24.5 51.6 61.7
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10
Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89
Heavy Vehicles(%) 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5%
Adj. Flow(vph) 152 655 1069 170 110 244
Shared Lane Traffic(%)
Lane Group Flow(vph) 152 655 1069 170 110 244
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Left Left Right Left Right
Median Width(ft) 12 12 12
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Turning Speed(mph) 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 1 1 1 1 1 1
Detector Template
Leading Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50
Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50
Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex
Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Queue(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Turn Type pm+pt NA NA pt+ov Prot Perm
Protected Phases 1 6 2 24 4 3
Permitted Phases 6 4
Detector Phase 1 6 2 24 4 4
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
14001622A_PMBD_APPROVED OFFICE-280,000 S.F. Synchro 8 Report
Page 1
YEAR 2019 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES - APPROVED PM
1: ANDERSON HILL ROAD & KING STREET 120A 111312015
x) t
Minimum Split(s) 9.0 9.0 9,0 9.0 9.0 20.0
Total Split(s) 15.0 75.0 60.0 25.0 25.0 20.0
Total Split(%) 12.5% 62.5% 50.0% 20.8% 20.8°/ 17%
Maximum Green(s) 10.0 70.0 55.0 20.0 20.0 18.0
Yellow Time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 2.0
All-Red Time(s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Lost Time Adjust(s) -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0
Total Lost Time(s) 40 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Recall Mode None Max Max None None None
Walk Time(s) 5.0
Flash Dont Walk(s) 11.0
Pedestrian Calls(#/hr) 0
Act Effct Green (s) 71.0 71.0 57.0 81.9 20.9 20.9
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.71 0.71 0.57 0.82 0.21 0.21
vlc Ratio 0.62 0.51 1.03 0.13 0.31 0.80
Control Delay 28.1 8.2 60.7 2.2 36.2 58.1
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 28.1 8.2 60.7 2.2 36.2 58.1
LOS C A E A D E
Approach Delay 12.0 52.6 51.3
Approach LOS B D D
Queue Length 50th(ft) 42 164 -749 17 60 149
Queue Length 95th(ft) 106 233 #977 29 108 #267
Internal Link Dist(ft) 1176 2569 2635
Turn Bay Length(ft) 75 200 250
Base Capacity(vph) 260 1286 1033 1262 361 307
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced vlc Ratio 0.58 0.51 1.03 0.13 0.30 0.79
f�$ui�rr►a �I,.-- - - -tet;;i1�r.�;;; ia���: - - ,if
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length:99.9
Natural Cycle: 150
Control Type:Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum vlc Ratio: 1.03
Intersection Signal Delay:38.8 Intersection LOS:D
Intersection Capacity Utilization 73.0% ICU Level of Service C
Analysis Period(min) 15
- Volume exceeds capacity,queue is theoretically infinite.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles,
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity,queue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
14001622A PMBD APPROVED OFFICE-280,000 S.F. Synchro 8 Report
Page 2
YEAR 2019 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES - APPROVED PM
1: ANDERSON HILL ROAD & KING STREET 120A 111312015
Splits and Phases: 1:ANDERSON HILL ROAD&KING STREET 120A)
A) 01 1k03 �1Q4
is s Is 20 5 25S
t06
75s t
14001622A_PMBD_APPROVED OFFICE-280,000 S.F. Synchro 8 Report
Page 3
YEAR 2019 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES - APPROVED PM
2: INTERNATIONAL DRIVE & KING STREET 120A) 1/13/2015
Lane Configurations T
Volume(vph) 574 40 86 620 231 539
Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length(ft) 325 450 250 0
Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1
Taper Length(ft) 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Ped Bike Factor 0.97 1.00 0.98 0.96
Frt 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow(prot) 1810 1538 1719 1810 1719 1538
Flt Permitted 0.221 0.950
Satd. Flow(perm) 1810 1497 399 1810 1684 1477
Right Tum on Red No Yes
Satd. Flow(RTOR) 331
Link Speed(mph) 35 35 30
Link Distance(ft) 1949 2649 1520
Travel Time(s) 38.0 51.6 34.5
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10
Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89
Heavy Vehicles(%) 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5%
Adj.Flow(vph) 645 45 97 697 260 606
Shared Lane Traffic(%)
Lane Group Flow(vph) 645 45 97 697 260 606
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right
Median Width(ft) 12 12 12
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 i
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Turning Speed(mph) 9 15 15 9
Number of Detectors 0 0 1 0 1 1
Detector Template
Leading Detector(ft) 0 0 50 0 50 50
Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50
Detector 1 Type C1+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Ci+Ex CI+Ex
Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Queue(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Turn Type NA pm+ov pm+pt NA Prot Perm
Protected Phases 2 3 1 6 3
Permitted Phases 2 6 3
Detector Phase 2 3 1 6 3 3
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial(s) 5.0 3.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
14001622A_PMBD_APPROVED OFFICE-280,000 S.F. Synchro 8 Report
Page 4
YEAR 2019 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES - APPROVED PM
2: INTERNATIONAL DRIVE & KING STREET 120A 1/13/2015
Minimum Split(s) 11.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 9.0 9.0
Total Split(s) 46.0 25.0 14.0 60.0 25.0 25.0
Total Split(%) 54.1% 29.4% 16.5% 70.6% 29.4% 29.4%
Maximum Green(s) 40.0 20.0 8.0 54.0 20.0 20.0
Yellow Time(s) 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0
All-Red Time(s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust(s) -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -110 -1.0
Total Lost Time(s) 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0
Lead/Lag Lag Lead
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension(s) 0.2 3.0 3.0 0.2 3.0 3.0
Recall Mode Max None None Max None None
Act Effct Green(s) 44.3 66.3 55.0 55.0 21.0 21.0
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.52 0.78 0.65 0.65 0.25 0.25
v/c Ratio 0.68 0.04 0.25 0.60 0.61 0.99
Control Delay 21.1 2.1 7.3 11.3 35.6 49.9
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 21.1 2.1 7.3 11.3 35.6 49.9
LOS C A A B D D
Approach Delay 19.9 10.8 45.6
Approach LOS- B B D
Queue Length 50th(ft) 259 4 17 189 123 165
Queue Length 95th(ft) 392 9 34 281 200 #383
Internal Link Dist(ft) 1869 2569 1440
Turn Bay Length(ft) 325 450 250
Base Capacity(vph) 942 1177 397 1171 424 614
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.68 0.04 0.24 0.60 0.61 0.99
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length:85
Actuated Cycle Length:85
Natural Cycle: 80
Control Type: Semi Act-Uncoord
Maximum v/c Ratio:0.99
Intersection Signal Delay: 26.3 Intersection LOS: C
Intersection Capacity Utilization 72.1% ICU Level of Service C
Analysis Period(min) 15
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity,queue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Splits and Phases: 2: INTERNATIONAL DRIVE&KING STREET(120A)
X412 0.3
14s 46S
6
14001622A_PMBD_APPROVED OFFICE-280,000 S.F. Synchro 8 Report
Page 5
YEAR 2019 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES - PROPOSED AM
1: ANDERSON HILL ROAD & KING STREET 120A 1113/2015
Lane Configurations t T r f
Volume(vph) 133 866 689 105 153 129
Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length(ft) 75 200 250 0
Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1
Taper Length(ft) 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Ped Bike Factor 1.00 0.98 0.95
Frt 0.850 0.850
At Protected 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow(prot) 1719 1810 1810 1538 1719 1538
Flt Permitted 0:203 0.950
Satd. Flow(perm) 367 1810 1810 1538 1677 1464
Right Tum on Red No No
Satd. Flow(RTOR)
Link Speed(mph) 35 35 30 �
Link Distance(ft) 1256 2649 2715
Travel Time(s) 24.5 51.6 61.7
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10
Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89
Heavy Vehicles(%) 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5%
Adj. Flow(vph) 149 973 774 118 172 145 _
Shared Lane Traffic(%)
Lane Group Flow(vph) 149 973 774 118 172 145
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Left Left Right Left Right AL
Median Width(ft) 12 12 12
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Tuming Speed(mph) 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 1 1 1 1 1 1
Detector Template -
Leading Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50
Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 '
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50
Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex
Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Queue(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Turn Type pm+pt NA NA pt+ov Prot Perm
Protected Phases 1 6 2 24 4 3
Permitted Phases 6 4
Detector Phase 1 6 2 24 4 4
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
14001622A_AMBD_PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL-110 HOMES Synchro 8 Report
Page 1
YEAR 2019 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES - PROPOSED AM
1: ANDERSON HILL ROAD & KING STREET 120A 111312015
T
Minimum Split(s) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 20.0
Total Split(s) 15.0 75.0 60.0 25.0 25.0 20.0
Total Split(%) 12.5% 62.5% 50-0% 20.8% 20.8% 17%
Maximum Green(s) 10.0 70.0 55.0 20-0 20.0 18.0
Yellow Time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 2.0
All-Red Time(s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Lost Time Adjust(s) -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0
Total Lost Time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Recall Mode None Max Max None None None
Walk Time(s) 5.0
Flash Dont Walk(s) 11.0
Pedestrian Calls(#/hr) 0
Act Effct Green (s) 71.1 71.1 57.6 77.2 15.6 15.6
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.75 0.75 0.61 0.82 0.16 0.16
vlc Ratio 0.36 0.72 0.70 0.09 0.61 0.60
Control Delay 6.3 10.9 18.3 2.0 46.2 47.5
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 6.3 10.9 18.3 2.0 46.2 47.5
LOS A B B A D D
Approach Delay 10.3 16.1 46.8
Approach LOS B B D
Queue Length 50th(ft) 20 257 295 10 97 82
Queue Length 95th (ft) 44 492 510 21 161 142
Internal Link Dist(ft) 1176 2569 2635
Turn Bay Length(ft) 75 200 250
Base Capacity(vph) 432 1358 1101 1342 381 324
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.34 0.72 0.70 009 0.45 0.45
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length:94.7
Natural Cycle:90
Control Type:Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum vlc Ratio:0.72
Intersection Signal Delay: 17.5 Intersection LOS:B
Intersection Capacity Utilization 62.1% ICU Level of Service B
Analysis Period(min) 15
Splits and Phases: 1:ANDERSON HILL ROAD&KING STREET(120A)
'15s 50s 24sI 125s
t06
Page 2
YEAR 2019 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES - PROPOSED AM
2: INTERNATIONAL DRIVE & KING STREET 120A) 1/13/2015
Lane Configurations T r
Volume(vph) 670 121 286 714 30 78
Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length(ft) 325 450 250 0
Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1
Taper Length(ft) 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Ped Bike Factor 0.97 1.00 0.98 0.96
Frt 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow(prot) 1810 1538 1719 1810 1719 1538
Flt Permitted 0.195 0.950
Satd. Flow(perm) 1810 1497 352 1810 1684 1477
Right Tum on Red No Yes
Satd. Flow(RTOR) 88
Link Speed(mph) 35 35 30
Link Distance(ft) 1949 2649 1520
Travel Time(s) 38.0 51.6 34.5
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10
Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89
Heavy Vehicles(%) 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5%
Adj. Flow(vph) 753 136 321 802 34 88
Shared Lane Traffic(%)
Lane Group Flow(vph) 753 136 321 802 34 88
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right
Median Width(ft) 12 12 12
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Turning Speed(mph) 9 15 15 9
Number of Detectors 0 0 1 0 1 1
Detector Template
Leading Detector(ft) 0 0 50 0 50 50
Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50
Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex
Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Queue(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Tum Type NA pm+ov pm+pt NA Prot Perm
Protected Phases 2 3 1 6 3
Permitted Phases 2 6 3
Detector Phase 2 3 1 6 3 3
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial(s) 5.0 3.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
14001622A AMBD PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL-110 HOMES Synchro 8 Report
Page 3
YEAR 2019 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES - PROPOSED AM
2: INTERNATIONAL DRIVE & KING STREET 120A) 111312015
Am �l
Minimum Split(s) 11.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 9.0 9.0
Total Split(s) 46.0 25.0 14.0 60.0 25.0 25.0
Total Split(%) 54.1% 29A% 16.5% 70.6% 29.4% 29.4%
Maximum Green(s) 40.0 20.0 8.0 54.0 20.0 20.0
Yellow Time(s) 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0
All-Red Time(s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust(s) -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0
Total Lost Time(s) 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0
Lead/Lag Lag Lead
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension(s) 0.2 3,0 3.0 0.2 3.0 3.0
Recall Mode Max None None Max None None
Act Effct Green(s) 41.0 50.1 55.0 55.0 8.1 8,1
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.57 0.69 0.76 0.76 0.11 0.11
v/c Ratio 0.73 0.13 0.73 0.58 0,18 0.36
Control Delay 17.1 2.9 17.0 5.9 31.0 12.1
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 17.1 2.9 17.0 5.9 31.0 12.1
LOS B A B A C B
Approach Delay 15.0 9.1 17.4
Approach LOS B A B
Queue Length 50th(ft) 223 12 30 108 14 0
Queue Length 95th(ft) 383 24 #82 211 38 37
Internal Link Dist(ft) 1869 2569 1440
Turn Bay Length(ft) 325 450 250
Base Capacity(vph) 1029 1320 439 1381 500 492
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 1.11 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.73 010 0.73 0.58 0.07 0.18
r - --
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length:85
Actuated Cycle Length:72.1
Natural Cycle:60
Control Type: Semi Act-Uncoord
Maximum v/c Ratio:0,73
Intersection Signal Delay: 12.0 Intersection LOS: B
Intersection Capacity Utilization 66.1% ICU Level of Service C
Analysis Period(min) 15
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity,queue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Splits and
03
nd Phases: 2: INTERNATIONAL DRIVE&KING STREET(120A) R]
�01 .74 rr
s �7 S
14001622A_AMBD_PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL-110 HOMES Synchro 8 Report
Page 4
YEAR 2019 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES - PROPOSED PM
1: ANDERSON HILL ROAD & KING STREET (120A) 1/13/2015
Lane Configurations t t
Volume(vph) 135 585 768 120 98 217
Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length (ft) 75 200 250 0
Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1
Taper Length(ft) 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Ped Bike Factor 1.00 0.98 0.95
Frt 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow(prot) 1719 1810 1810 1538 1719 1538
Flt Permitted 0.121 0.950
Satd. Flow(perm) 219 1810 1810 1538 1678 1464
Right Tum on Red No No
Satd. Flow(RTOR)
Link Speed(mph) 35 35 30
Link Distance(ft) 1256 2649 2715
Travel Time(s) 24.5 51.6 61.7
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10
Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89
Heavy Vehicles(%) 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5%
Adj. Flow(vph) 152 657 863 135 110 244
Shared Lane Traffic(%)
Lane Group Flow(vph) 152 657 863 135 110 244
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Left Left Right Left Right
Median Width(ft) 12 12 12
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Turning Speed(mph) 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 1 1 1 1 1 1
Detector Template
Leading Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50
Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50
Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex
Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Queue(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0:0
Detector 1 Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Turn Type pm+pt NA NA pt+ov Prot Perm
Protected Phases 1 6 2 24 4 3
Permitted Phases 6 4
Detector Phase 1 6 2 24 4 4
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
14001622A PMBD PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL-110 HOMES Synchro 8 Report
Page 1
YEAR 2019 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES - PROPOSED PM
1: ANDERSON HILL ROAD & KING STREET 120A 1/13/2015
Mil
Minimum Split(s) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 20.0
Total Split(s) 15.0 75.0 60.0 25-0 25.0 20.0
Total Split(%) 12.5% 62,5% 50.0% 20.8% 20.8% 17%
Maximum Green(s) 10.0 70.0 55.0 20.0 20.0 18.0
Yellow Time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4,0 2.0
All-Red Time(s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Lost Time Adjust(s) -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0
Total Lost Time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Recall Mode None Max Max None None None
Walk Time(s) 5,0
Flash Dont Walk(s) 11.0
Pedestrian Calls(#/hr) 0
Act Effct Green(s) 71.0 71.0 57.0 81.9 20.9 20.9
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.71 0.71 0.57 0.82 0.21 0.21
v/c Ratio 0.50 0.51 0.84 0.11 0.31 0.80
Control Delay 11.8 8.3 27.0 2.1 36.2 58.1
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 11.8 8.3 27.0 2.1 36.2 58.1
LOS B A C A D E
Approach Delay 8.9 23.7 51.3
Approach LOS A C D
Queue Length 50th(ft) 27 165 435 13 60 149
Queue Length 95th (ft) 58 234 #644 24 108 #267
Internal Link Dist(ft) 1176 2569 2635
Turn Bay Length(ft) 75 200 250
Base Capacity(vph) 320 1286 1033 1262 361 307
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.4 0.51 0.84 0.11 0.30 0.79
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length:99,9
Natural Cycle:90
Control Type:Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio:0.84
Intersection Signal Delay,22.7 Intersection LOS:C
Intersection Capacity Utilization 63.3% ICU Level of Service B
Analysis Period(min) 15
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity,queue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Splits and Phases: 1:ANDERSON HILL ROAD&KING STREET(120A)
A) al 4 02 3 04
15s 1 1605 Sas 256
t,06
YEAR 2019 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES - PROPOSED PM
2: INTERNATIONAL DRIVE & KING STREET (120A) 1/13/2015
Lane Configurations t r
Volume(vph) 574 41 88 620 140 325
Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length(ft) 325 450 250 0
Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1
Taper Length(ft) 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Ped Bike Factor 0.97 1.00 0.98 0.96
Frt 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0,950 0.950
Satd. Flow(prot) 1810 1538 1719 1810 1719 1538
Flt Permitted 0.257 0.950
Satd. Flow(perm) 1810 1497 464 1810 1684 1477
Right Tum on Red No Yes
Satd. Flow(RTOR) 331
Link Speed(mph) 35 35 30
Link Distance(ft) 1949 2649 1520
Travel Time(s) 38.0 51.6 34.5
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10
Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89
Heavy Vehicles(%) 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5%
Adj.Flow(vph) 645 46 99 697 157 365
Shared Lane Traffic(%)
Lane Group Flow(vph) 645 46 99 697 157 365
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right
Median Width(ft) 12 12 12
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Turning Speed(mph) 9 15 15 9
Number of Detectors 0 0 1 0 1 1
Detector Template
Leading Detector(ft) 0 0 50 0 50 50
Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50
Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex
Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Queue(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Turn Type NA pm+ov pm+pt NA Prot Perm
Protected Phases 2 3 1 6 3
Permitted Phases 2 6 3
Detector Phase 2 3 1 6 3 3
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial(s) 5.0 3.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
14001622A PMBD PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL-110 HOMES Synchro 8 Report
Page 3
YEAR 2019 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES - PROPOSED PM
2: INTERNATIONAL DRIVE & KING STREET (120A) 1/13/2015
Minimum Split(s) 11.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 9.0 9.0
Total Split(s) 46.0 25.0 14.0 60.0 25.0 25.0
Total Split(%) 54.1% 29.4% 16.5% 70.6% 29.4% 29.4%
Maximum Green(s) 40.0 20.0 8.0 54.0 20.0 20.0
Yellow Time(s) 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0
All-Red Time(s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust(s) -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0
Total Lost Time(s) 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0
Lead/Lag Lag Lead
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension(s) 0.2 3.0 3.0 0.2 3.0 3.0
Recall Mode Max None None Max None None
Act Effct Green(s) 44.8 59.7 55.2 55.2 13.9 13.9
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.57 0.76 0.71 0.71 0.18 0.18
v/c Ratio 0.62 0.04 0.22 0.54 0.51 0.68
Control Delay 16.8 2.1 5.6 8.2 34.9 12.1
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 16.8 2.1 5.6 8.2 34.9 12.1
LOS B A A A C B
Approach Delay 15.8 7.9 19.0
Approach LOS B A B
Queue Length 50th(ft) 202 4 12 128 70 14
Queue Length 95th(ft) 392 10 34 281 123 87
Internal Link Dist(ft) 1869 2569 1440
Turn Bay Length(ft) 325 450 250
Base Capacity(vph) 1039 1259 473 1279 463 640
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.62 0.04 0.21 0.54 0.34 0.57
ANTMOW
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length:85
Actuated Cycle Length:78.1
Natural Cycle:60
Control Type: Semi Act-Uncoord
Maximum v/c Ratio:0.68
Intersection Signal Delay: 13.5 Intersection LOS: B
Intersection Capacity Utilization 58.9% ICU Level of Service B
Analysis Period(min) 15
Splits and Phases: 2: INTERNATIONAL DRIVE&KING STREET(120A) _
X41 02 03
14s 1 946S 25s
*_06
14001622A_PMBD_PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL-110 HOMES Synchro 8 Report
Page 4
W/ SIGNAL OPTIMIZATION
YEAR 2019 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES WEEKDAY PEAK AM HIGHWAY HOUR
1: ANDERSON HILL ROAD & KING STREET 120A 1/13/2015
t I
Lane Configurations t t r
Volume(vph) 133 853 650 98 151 129
Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length(ft) 75 200 250 0
Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1
Taper Length(ft) 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Ped Bike Factor 1.00 0.97 0.95
Frt 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow(prot) 1719 1810 1810 1538 1719 1538
Flt Permitted 0.261 0.950
Satd. Flow(perm) 471 1810 1810 1538 1667 1454
Right Tum on Red No No
Satd. Flow(RTOR)
Link Speed(mph) 35 35 30
Link Distance(ft) 1256 2649 2715
Travel Time(s) 24.5 51.6 61.7
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10
Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89
Heavy Vehicles(%) 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5%
Adj. Flow(vph) 149 958 730 110 1:70 145
Shared Lane Traffic(%)
Lane Group Flow(vph) 149 958 730 110 170 145 C-0
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Left Left Right Left Right
Median Width(ft) 12 12 12
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Turning Speed(mph) 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 1 1 1 1 1 1
Detector Template
Leading Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50
Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50
Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex C1+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex
Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Queue(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Tum Type pm+pt NA NA pt+ov Prot Perm
Protected Phases 1 6 2 24 4 3
Permitted Phases 6 4
Detector Phase 1 6 2 24 4 4
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
14001622A_AMNB-OPTIMIZATION Synchro 8 Report
Page 1
YEAR 2019 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES WEEKDAY PEAK AM HIGHWAY HOUR
1: ANDERSON HILL ROAD & KING STREET 120A 1/13/2015
Minimum Split(s) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 20.0
Total Split(s) 10.0 79.0 69.0 21.0 21.0 20.0
Total Split(%) 8.3% 65.8% 57.5% 17.5% 17.5% 17%
Maximum Green(s) 5.0 74.0 64.0 16.0 16.0 18.0
Yellow Time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 2.0
All-Red Time(s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Lost Time Adjust(s) -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0
Total Lost Time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Recall Mode None Max Max None None None
Walk Time(s) 5.0
Flash Dont Walk(s) 11.0
Pedestrian Calls(#Ihr) 0
Act Effct Green(s) 75.0 75.0 65.0 84.1 15.1 15.1
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.76 0.76 0.66 0.86 0.15 0.15
v/c Ratio 0.34 0.69 0.61 0.08 0.64 0.65
Control Delay 5.4 9.4 12.4 1.2 50.9 53.3
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 5.4 9.4 12.4 1.2 50.9 53.3
LOS A A B A D D
Approach Delay 8.9 10.9 52.0
Approach LOS A B D
Queue Length 50th (ft) 21 263 243 7 101 86
Queue Length 95th(ft) 37 392 351 12 168 150
Internal Link Dist(ft) 1176 2569 2635
Turn Bay Length(ft) 75 200 250
Base Capacity(vph) 436 1384 1199 1348 298 252
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
FRed�upc�edv//c Ratio 0.34 0.69 0.61 0.08 057 0.58
-
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length:98.1
Natural Cycle: 90
Control Type:Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio:0.69
Intersection Signal Delay: 15.7 Intersection LOS:B
Intersection Capacity Utilization 59.9% ICU Level of Service B
Analysis Period(min)15
Splits and Phases: 1:ANDERSON HILL ROAD&KING STREET(12.0A)
165 12695 120S 21
t06
Page 2
YEAR 2019 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES WEEKDAY PEAK AM HIGHWAY HOUR
2: INTERNATIONAL DRIVE & KING STREET (120A) 1113/2015
Lane Configurations t r
Volume(vph) 670 114 271 714 11 32
Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length(ft) 325 450 250 0
Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1
Taper Length(ft) 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Ped Bike Factor 0.97 1.00 0.93 0.91
Frt 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow(prot) 1810 1538 1719 1810 1719 1538
Flt Permitted 0.240 0.950
Satd. Flow(perm) 1810 1496 434 1810 1597 1401
Right Tum on Red No Yes
Satd. Flow(RTOR) 36
Link Speed(mph) 35 35 30
Link Distance(ft) 1949 2649 1520
Travel Time(s) 38.0 51.6 34.5
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10
Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89
Heavy Vehicles(%) 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5%
Adj.Flow(vph) 753 128 304 802 12 36
Shared Lane Traffic(%)
Lane Group Flow(vph) 7,57 1128 304 802 12 36
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right
Median Width(ft) 12 12 12
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Turning Speed(mph) 9 15 15 9
Number of Detectors 0 0 1 0 1 1
Detector Template
Leading Detector(ft) 0 0 50 0 50 50
Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50
Detector 1 Type Ci+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex
Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Queue(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Turn Type NA pm+ov pm+pt NA Prot Perm
Protected Phases 2 3 1 6 3
Permitted Phases 2 6 3
Detector Phase 2 3 1 6 3 3
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial(s) 5.0 3.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
14001622A_AMNB-OPTIMIZATION Synchro 8 Report
Page 3
YEAR 2019 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES WEEKDAY PEAK AM HIGHWAY HOUR
2: INTERNATIONAL DRIVE & KING STREET 120A 1/13/2015
Minimum Split(s) 11.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 9.0 9.0
Total Split(s) 55.0 10.0 20.0 75.0 10.0 10.0
Total Split(%) 64.7% 11.8% 23.5% 88.2% 11.8% 11.8%
Maximum Green(s) 49.0 5.0 14.0 69.0 5.0 5.0
Yellow Time(s) 5.0 4.0 5.0 5:0 4.0 4.0
All-Red Time(s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust(s) -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0
Total Lost Time(s) 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0
Lead/Lag Lag Lead +.
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension(s) 0.2 10 3.0 0.2 3.0 3.0
Recall Mode Max None None Max None None
Act Effct Green(s) 54.6 61.6 70.0 70.0 6.0 6.0
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.64 0.72 0.82 0.82 0.07 0.07
v/c Ratio 0.65 0.12 0.59 0.54 0.10 0.27
Control Delay 13.3 3.2 6.9 3.9 39.0 18.7
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 13.3 3.2 6.9 3.9 39.0 18.7
LOS B A A A D B
Approach Delay 11.8 4.7 23.8
Approach LOS B A C
Queue Length 50th(ft) 213 12 23 91 6 0
Queue Length 95th(ft) 387 32 38 135 23 28
Internal Link Dist(ft) 1869 2569 1440
Turn Bay Length(ft) 325 450 250
Base Capacity(vph) 1162 1086 584 1490 121 132
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 .1
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.65 0.12 0.52 0.54 0.10 0.27
tnfe
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length:85
Actuated Cycle Length: 85
Natural Cycle:60
Control Type: Semi Act-Uncoord
Maximum v/c Ratio:0.65
Intersection Signal Delay:8.2 Intersection LOS:A
Intersection Capacity Utilization 65.3% ICU Level of Service C
Analysis Period(min) 15
Splits and Phases: 2: INTERNATIONAL DRIVE&KING STREET 120A
61 0 z 0.3
20s 5S
\6
14001622A_AMNB-OPTIMIZATION Synchro 8 Report
Page 4
YEAR 2019 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES WEEKDAY PEAK PM HIGHWAY HOUR
1: ANDERSON HILL ROAD & KING STREET 120A 1/13/2015
AIL) t
Lane Configurations t t
Volume(vph) 135 541 743 116 91 217
Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length(ft) 75 200 250 0
Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1
Taper Length(ft) 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Ped Bike Factor 1.00 0.98 0.95
Frt 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow(prot) 1719 1810 1810 1538 1719 1538
Flt Permitted 0.165 0.950 _
Satd. Flow(perm) 298 1810 1810 1538 1680 1466
Right Turn on Red No No
Satd. Flow(RTOR)
Link Speed(mph) 35 35 30
Link Distance(ft) 1256 2649 2715
Travel Time(s) 24.5 51.6 61.7
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10
Peak Hour Factor 0:89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89
Heavy Vehicles(%) 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5%
Adj. Flow(vph) 152 608 835 130 102 244
Shared Lane Traffic(%)
Lane Group Flow(vph) 152 608 835 130 102 244
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Left Left Right Left Right
Median Width(ft) 12 12 12
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Turning Speed(mph) 15 v 15 9
Number of Detectors 1 1 1
Detector Template
Leading Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50
Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50
Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex
Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Queue(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Turn Type pm+pt NA NA pt+ov Prot Perm
Protected Phases 1 6 2 24 4 3
Permitted Phases 6 4
Detector Phase 1 6 2 24 4 4
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
14001622A PMNB Synchro 8 Report
Page 1
YEAR 2019 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES WEEKDAY PEAK PM HIGHWAY HOUR
1: ANDERSON HILL ROAD & KING STREET 120A 1/13/2015
t ►� �i
Minimum Split(s) 9.0 9,0 9.0 9.0 9.0 20.0
Total Split(s) 10.0 74.0 64.0 25.0 26.0 20.0
Total Split(%) 8.3% 61.7% 533% 21.7'% 21.7% 17%
Maximum Green(s) 5.0 69.0 59.0 21.0 21.0 18.0
Yellow Time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 2,0
All-Red Time(s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Lost Time Adjust(s) -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0
Total Lost Time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension(s) 3.0 3,0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Recall Mode None Max Max None None None
Walk Time(s) 5.0
Flash Dont Walk(s) 11.0
Pedestrian Calls(#/hr) 0
Act Effct Green(s) 70.0 70.0 60.0 85.3 21.3 21.3
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.70 0.70 0.60 0.86 0.21 0.21
v/c Ratio 0.52 0.48 0.76 0.10 0.28 0.78
Control Delay 11.3 8.1 20.5 1.2 34.8 55.1
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 11.3 8.1 20.5 1.2 34.8 55.1
LOS B A C A C E
Approach Delay 8.8 17.9 49.1
Approach LOS A B D
Queue Length 50th(ft) 28 153 366 8 54 146
Queue Length 95th(ft) 47 217 524 14 101 #257
Internal Link Dist(ft) 1176 2569 2635
Turn Bay Length(ft) 75 200 250
Base Capacity(vph) 295 1276 1094 1332 381 324
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.52 0.48 0.76 0.10 0.27 C 75
Area Type. Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length:99.3
Natural Cycle:90
Control Type:Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio:0.78
Intersection Signal Delay: 19.8 Intersection LOS:B
Intersection Capacity Utilization 61.6% ICU Level of Service B
Analysis Period(min) 15
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity,queue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Splits and Phases: 1:ANDERSON HILL ROAD&KING STREET(120A) �}
pl o2 3 % 04
54s 20s 26s
tQ5
YEAR 2019 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES WEEKDAY PEAK PM HIGHWAY HOUR
2: INTERNATIONAL DRIVE & KING STREET (120A) 1/13/2015
Lane Configurations +
Volume(vph) 574 19 37 620 127 296
Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length(ft) 325 450 250 0
Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1
Taper Length(ft) 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Ped Bike Factor 0.97 1.00 0.98 0.96
Frt 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow(prot) 1810 1538 1719 1810 1719 1538
Flt Permitted 0.290 0.950
Satd. Flow(perm) 1810 1498 523 1810 1683 1475
Right Turn on Red No Yes
Satd. Flow(RTOR) 290
Link Speed(mph) 35 35 30
Link Distance(ft) 1949 2649 1520
Travel Time(s) 38.0 51.6 34.5
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10
Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89
Heavy Vehicles(%) 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5%
Adj.Flow(vph) 645 21 42 697 143 333
Shared Lane Traffic(%)
Lane Group Flow(vph) 645 21 42 697 143 333
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right
Median Width(ft) 12 12 12
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Turning Speed(mph) 9 15 15 9
Number of Detectors 0 0 1 0 1 1
Detector Template
Leading Detector(ft) 0 0 50 0 50 50
Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50
Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex
Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Queue(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0:0 0.0
Detector 1 Delay(s) 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Tum Type NA pm+ov pm+pt NA Prot Perm
Protected Phases 2 3 1 6 3
Permitted Phases 2 6 3
Detector Phase 2 3 1 6 3 3
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial(s) 5.0 3.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
14001622A PMNB Synchro 8 Report
Page 3
YEAR 2019 NO-BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES WEEKDAY PEAK PM HIGHWAY HOUR
2: INTERNATIONAL DRIVE & KING STREET (120A) 111312015
Minimum Split(s) 11.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 9.0 9.0
Total Split(s) 51.0 24.0 10.0 61.0 24.0 24.0
Total Split(%) 60.0% 28,2% 11.8% 71.8% 28.2% 28.2%
Maximum Green(s) 45.0 19.0 4.0 55.0 19.0 19.0
Yellow Time(s) 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0
All-Red Time(s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust(s) -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1,0 -1.0
Total Lost Time(s) 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0
Lead/Lag Lag Lead
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension(s) 0.2 3.0 3.0 0.2 3.0 3.0
Recall Mode Max None None Max None None
Act Effct Green(s) 50.4 64.7 56,2 56.2 13.3 13.3
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.64 0.82 0.72 0.72 0.17 0.17
vlc Ratio 0.56 O.C2 0.09 0.54 0.49 0.68
Control Delay 12.3 1.3 4.6 7.8 35.1 13.5
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 12.3 1.3 4.6 7.8 35.1 13.5
LOS B A A A D B
Approach Delay 12.0 7.6 20.0
Approach LOS B A C
Queue Length 50th (ft) 179 1 5 124 64 18
Queue Length 95th(ft) 341 4 17 269 115 91
Internal Link Dist(ft) 1869 2569 1440
Turn Bay Length(ft) 325 450 250
Base Capacity(vph) 1160 1320 450 1295 439 592
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced vlc Ratio 056 0.02 0.09 0.54 0.33 0.56
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length:85
Actuated Cycle Length:78.5
Natural Cycle: 55
Control Type: Semi Act-Uncoord
Maximum vlc Ratio:0.68
Intersection Signal Delay: 12.3 Intersection LOS: B
Intersection Capacity Utilization 57.1% ICU Level of Service B
Analysis Period(min) 15
Splits and Phases: 2: INTERNATIONAL DRIVE&KING STREET 120A
Jr-01 d2 ! 03
X36
14001622A PMNB Synchro 8 Report
Page 4
YEAR 2019 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES - APPROVED AM
1: ANDERSON HILL ROAD & KING STREET 120A 1/13/2015
Lane Configurations t T r
Volume(vph) 133 1083 682 103 190 129
Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length(ft) 75 200 250 0
Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1
Taper Length(ft) 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Ped Bike Factor 1.00 0.97 0.94
Frt 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0,950
Satd. Flow(prot) 1719 1810 1810 1538 1719 1538
Flt Permitted 0.246 0:950
Satd. Flow(perm) 444 1810 1810 1538 1661 1447
Right Tum on Red No No
Satd. Flow(RTOR)
Link Speed(mph) 35 35 30
Link Distance(ft) 1256 2649 2715
Travel Time(s) 24.5 51.6 61.7
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10
Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89
Heavy Vehicles(%) 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5%
Adj. Flow(vph) 149 1217 766 116 213 145
Shared Lane Traffic(%)
Lane Group Flow(vph) 149 1217 766 116 213 145
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Left Left Right Left Right
Median Width(ft) 12 12 12
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Turning Speed(mph) 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 1 1 1 1 1 1
Detector Template
Leading Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50
Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50
Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex
Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Queue(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Turn Type pm+pt NA NA pt+ov Prot Perm
Protected Phases 1 6 2 24 4 3
Permitted Phases 6 4
Detector Phase 1 6 2 24 4 4
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
14001622A AMBD APPROVED OFFICE-280,000 S.F.-OPTIMIZATION Synchro 8 Report
Page 1
YEAR 2019 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES - APPROVED AM
1: ANDERSON HILL ROAD & KING STREET 120A 111312015
xi T
Minimum Split(s) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 20.0
Total Split(s) 10.0 81.0 71.0 19.0 19.0 20.0
Total Split(%) 8.3% 67.5% 59,2% 15.8% 15.8% 17%
Maximum Green (s) 5.0 76.0 66.0 14.0 14.0 18.0
Yellow Time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 2.0
All-Red Time(s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Lost Time Adjust(s) -1.0 -1.0 -1,0 -1.0 -1.0
Total Lost Time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension(s) 3.0 3.0 30 3.0 3.0 3.0
Recall Mode None Max Max None None None
Walk Time(s) 5.0
Flash Dont Walk(s) 11.0
Pedestrian Calls(#/hr) 0
Act Effct Green(s) 77.0 77.0 67.0 86.0 15.0 15.0
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.77 0.77 0.67 0.86 0.15 0.15
v/c Ratio 0.36 0.87 0.63 0.09 0.83 0.67
Control Delay 5.3 17.3 12.4 1.2 68.1 56.5
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 5.3 17.3 12.4 1.2 68.1 56.5
LOS A B B A E E
Approach Delay 16.0 10.9 63.4
Approach LOS B B E
Queue Length 50th(ft) 19 439 249 7 134 88
Queue Length 95th(ft) 33 706 355 13 #252 #169
Internal Link Dist(ft) 1176 2569 2635
Turn Bay Length(ft) 75 200 250
Base Capacity(vph) 418 1393 1212 1322 257 217
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.36 0.87 0.63 0 OC- 0.83 0.67
A.-.- :-irk:4r•aWIF Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 100
Natural Cycle: 130
Control Type:Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.87
Intersection Signal Delay:20.8 Intersection LOS: C
Intersection Capacity Utilization 74.2% ICU Level of Service D
Analysis Period(min) 15
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity,queue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Spfiitts and Phases: 1:ANDERSON HILL ROAD&KING STREET 120A
A)
�}
of 4 02 .403 % 04
t06
YEAR 2019 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES - APPROVED AM
2: INTERNATIONAL DRIVE & KING STREET 120A 1/13/2015
Lane Configurations t
Volume(vph) 670 229 540 714 27 69
Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length(ft) 325 450 250 0
Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1
Taper Length(ft) 25 25
Lane Util.Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Ped Bike Factor 0.97 1.00 0.92 0.90
Frt 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow(prot) 1810 1538 1719 1810 1719 1538
Flt Permitted 0.097 0.950
Satd. Flow(perm) 1810 1493 175 1810 1573 1379
Right Turn on Red No Yes
Satd. Flow(RTOR) 78
Link Speed(mph) 35 35 30
Link Distance(ft) 1949 2649 1520
Travel Time(s) 38.0 51.6 34.5
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10
Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89
Heavy Vehicles(%) 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5%
Adj. Flow(vph) 753 257 607 802 30 78
Shared Lane Traffic(%)
Lane Group Flow(vph) 753 257 607 802 30 78
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right
Median Width(ft) 12 12 12
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Turning Speed(mph) 9 15 15 9
Number of Detectors 0 0 1 0 1 1
Detector Template
Leading Detector(ft) 0 0 50 0 50 50
Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50
Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex
Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Queue(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Tum Type NA pm+ov pm+pt NA Prot Perm
Protected Phases 2 3 1 6 3
Permitted Phases 2 6 3
Detector Phase 2 3 1 6 3 3
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial(s) 5.0 3.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
14001622A AMBD..APPROVED OFFICE-280,000 S.F.-OPTIMIZATION Synchro 8 Report
Page 3
YEAR 2019 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES - APPROVED AM
2: INTERNATIONAL DRIVE & KING STREET 120A 1/13/2015
Minimum Split(s) 11.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 9.0 9.0
Total Split(s) 44.0 9.0 32.0 76.0 9.0 9.0
Total Split(%) 51.8% 10.6% 37.6% 89,4% 10.6% 10.6%
Maximum Green(s) 38.0 4.0 26.0 70.0 4.0 4.0
Yellow Time(s) 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 4,0 4.0
All-Red Time(s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust(s) -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0
Total Lost Time(s) 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0
Lead/Lag Lag Lead
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension(s) 0.2 3.0 3.0 0.2 3.0 3.0
Recall Mode Max None None Max None None
Act Effct Green(s) 39.2 45.2 71.0 71.0 5.0 5.0
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.46 0.53 0.84 0.84 0.06 0.06
v/c Ratio 0.90 0.32 0.96 0.53 0.30 0.51
Control Delay 37.8 10.6 50.3 3.5 46.3 21.9
Queue belay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 37.8 10.6 50.3 3.5 46.3 21.9
LOS D B D A D C
Approach Delay 30.9 23.7 28.7
Approach LOS C C C
Queue Length 50th(ft) 358 64 256 80 16 0
Queue Length 95th (ft) #582 106 #464 120 43 41
Internal Link Dist(ft) 1869 2569 1440
Turn Bay Length(ft) 325 450 250
Base Capacity(vph) 834 796 636 1511 101 154
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.90 032 0.95 0.53 0.30 0.51
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length:85
Actuated Cycle Length:85
Natural Cycle: 90
Control Type: Semi Act-Uncoord
Maximum v/c Ratio:0.96
Intersection Signal Delay: 26.8 Intersection LOS:C
Intersection Capacity Utilization 80.2% ICU Level of Service D
Analysis Period(min) 15
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity,queue may be longer,
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Splils and Phases: 2: INTERNATIONAL DRIVE&KING STREET(120A)
Jr-01 'X 0+2 03
32s 1 0445 9s
5
14001622A_AMBD_APPROVED OFFICE-280,000 S.F.-OPTIMIZATION Synchro 8 Report
Page 4
YEAR 2019 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES - APPROVED PM
1: ANDERSON HILL ROAD & KING STREET (120A) 1/13/2015
Lane Configurations t T
Volume(vph) 135 583 951 151 98 217
Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length(ft) 75 200 250 0
Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1
Taper Length(ft) 25 25 -
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Ped Bike Factor 1.00 0.98 0.95
Frt 0.850 0.850
At Protected 0:950 0.950
Satd. Flow(prot) 1719 1810 1810 1538 1719 1538
Flt Permitted 0.064 0.950
Satd. Flow(perm) 116 1810 1810 1538 1676 1460
Right Tum on Red No No
Satd. Flow(RTOR)
Link Speed(mph) 35 35 30
Link Distance(ft) 1256 2649 2715
Travel Time(s) 24.5 51.6 61.7
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10
Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89
Heavy Vehicles(%) 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5%
Adj. Flow(vph) 152 655 1069 170 110 244
Shared Lane Traffic(%)
Lane Group Flow(vph) 152 655 1069 170 110 244
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Left Left Right Left Right
Median Width(ft) 12 12 12
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Turning Speed(mph) 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 1 1 1 1 1 1
Detector Template
Leading Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50
Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50
Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex
Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Queue(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Turn Type pm+pt NA NA pt+ov Prot Perm
Protected Phases 1 6 2 24 4 3
Permitted Phases 6 4
Detector Phase 1 6 2 24 4 4
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
14001622A_PMBD_APPROVED OFFICE-280,000 S.F.-OPTIMIZATION Synchro 8 Report
Page 1
YEAR 2019 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES - APPROVED PM
1: ANDERSON HILL ROAD & KING STREET 120A 1/13/2015
a
Minimum Split(s) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 20.0
Total Split(s) 9.0 77.0 68.0 23.0 23.0 20.0
Total Split(%) 7,5% 64.2% 56.7% 19.2% 19.2% 17%
Maximum Green(s) 4.0 72.0 63.0 18.0 18.0 18.0
Yellow Time(s) 4.0 4.0 4,0 4.0 4.0 2.0
All-Red Time(s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Lost Time Adjust(s) -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 1.0 -1.0
Total Lost Time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Recall Mode None Max Max None None None
Walk Time(s) 5.0
Flash Dont Walk(s) 11.0
Pedestrian Calls(#/hr) 0
Act Effct Green(s) 73.0 73.0 64.0 87.0 19.0 19.0
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.73 0.73 0-64 0;87 0.19 0.19
v/c Ratio 0.93 0.50 0.92 0.13 0.34 0.88
Control Delay 72.9 7.3 30.E 1,2 38.5 71.6
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 72.9 73 30.7 1.2 38.5 71.6
LOS E A C D E
Approach Delay 19.6 26.6 61.3
Approach LOS B C E
Queue Length 50th(ft) 43 150 545 9 61 153
Queue Length 95th(ft) #163 213 #880 16 111 #287
Internal Link Dist(ft) 1176 2569 2635
Turn Bay Length(ft) 75 200 250
Base Capacity(vph) 164 132' 1'58 1338 326 777
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 J
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced A Ratio 0.93 0.50 3.92 0.13 0.34 0.88 1.
tri
Area Type: Ofher
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length: 100
Natural Cycle: 150
Control Type:Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio:0.93
Intersection Signal Delay:29.4 Intersection LOS:C
Intersection Capacity Utilization 73.0% ICU Level of Service C
Analysis Period(min) 15
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity,queue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Splits and Phases: 1:ANDERSON HILL ROAD&KING STREET 120A �}
of 02 •403 % 04
9A - ENE-10010101111
tsab
YEAR 2019 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES - APPROVED PM
2: INTERNATIONAL DRIVE & KING STREET 120A 1/13/2015
Lane Configurations t
Volume(vph) 574 40 86 620 231 539
Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length(ft) 325 450 250 0
Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1
Taper Length(ft) 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Ped Bike Factor 0.97 1.00 0.99 0.97
Frt 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow(prot) 1810 1538 1719 1810 1719 1538
Flt Permitted 0.173 0.950
Satd. Flow(perm) 1810 1498 312 1810 1695 1486
Right Tum on Red No Yes
Satd. Flow(RTOR) 235
Link Speed(mph) 35 35 30
Link Distance(ft) 1949 2649 1520
Travel Time(s) 38.0 51.6 34.5
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10
Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89
Heavy Vehicles(%) 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5%
Adj. Flow(vph) 645 45 97 697 260 606
Shared Lane Traffic(%)
Lane Group Flow(vph) 645 45 97 697 260 606
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right
Median Width(ft) 12 12 12
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Tuming Speed(mph) 9 15 15 9
Number of Detectors 0 0 1 0 1 1
Detector Template
Leading Detector(ft) 0 0 50 0 50 50
Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50
Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex C1+Ex
Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Queue(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Tum Type NA pm+ov pm+pt NA Prot Perm
Protected Phases 2 3 1 6 3
Permitted Phases 2 6 3
Detector Phase 2 3 1 6 3 3
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial(s) 5.0 3.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
14001622A_PMBD_APPROVED OFFICE-280,000 S.F.-OPTIMIZATION Synchro 8 Report
Page 3
YEAR 2019 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES - APPROVED PM
2: INTERNATIONAL DRIVE & KING STREET 120A 1/13/2015
Minimum Split(s) 11.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 9.0 9.0
Total Split(s) 41.0 34.0 10.0 51.0 34.0 34.0
Total Split(%) 48.2% 40.0% 11.8% 60.0% 40.0% 40.0%
Maximum Green(s) 35.0 29.0 4.0 45.0 29.0 29.0
Yellow Time(s) 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0
All-Red Time(s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust(s) -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0
Total Lost Time(s) 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0
Lead/Lag Lag Lead
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension(s) 0.2 3.0 3.0 0.2 3.0 3.0
Recall Mode Max None None Max None None
Act Effct Green(s) 38.3 66.9 46.1 46.1 27.5 27.5
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.46 0.81 0.56 0.56 0.33 0.33
v/c Ratio 0.77 0:04 0.37 0.69 0.45 0.93
Control Delay 28.5 1.4 13.7 18.4 24.4 39.3
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 28.5 1.4 13.7 18.4 24.4 39.3
LOS C A B B C D
Approach Delay 26.7 17.8 34.9
Approach LOS C B C
Queue Length 50th(ft) 299 3 24 260 104 197
Queue Length 95th(ft) #487 6 46 386 169 #403
Internal Link Dist(ft) 1869 2569 1440
Turn Bay Length(ft) 325 450 250
Base Capacity(vph) 838 1244 259 1009 625 690
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.77 0.04 0.37 0.69 0.42 0.88
n•
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length:85
Actuated Cycle Length:82.7
Natural Cycle:80
Control Type: Semi Act-Uncoord
Maximum v/c Ratio:0.93
Intersection Signal Delay: 26.7 Intersection LOS:C
Intersection Capacity Utilization 72.1% ICU Level of Service C
Analysis Period(min) 15
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity,queue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles.
Splits and Phases:`, 2: INTERNATIONAL DRIVE&KING STREET(120A
X01 �4 02 t 03
IDS
� 15 34 s
1
X06
14001622A_PMBD_APPROVED OFFICE-280,000 S.F.-OPTIMIZATION Synchro 8 Report
Page 4
YEAR 2019 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES - PROPOSED AM
1: ANDERSON HILL ROAD & KING STREET 120A) 1/13/2015
t
Lane Configurations T `
Volume(vph) 133 866 689 105 153 129
Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length(ft) 75 200 250 0
Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1
Taper Length(ft) 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Ped Bike Factor 1.00 0.97 0.95
Frt D.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow(prot) 1719 1810 1810 1538 1719 1538
Flt Permitted 0.231 0.950
Satd. Flow(perm) 417 1810 1810 1538 1668 1454
Right Tum on Red No No
Satd. Flow(RTOR)
Link Speed(mph) 35 35 30
Link Distance(ft) 1256 2649 2715
Travel Time(s) 24.5 51.6 61.7
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10
Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0 89 0.89 0.89 0.89
Heavy Vehicles(%) 5% 5'1 5`' 5% 5% 5%
Adj,Flow(vph) 149 973 774 118 172 145
Shared Lane Traffic(%)
Lane Group Flow(vph) 149 973 774 118 172 145
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Left Left Right Left Right
Median Width(ft) 12 12 12
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Turning Speed(mph) 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 1 1 1 1 1 1
Detector Template
Leading Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50
Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50
Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex
Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Queue(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Turn Type pm+pt NA NA pt+ov Prot Perm
Protected Phases 1 6 2 24 4 3
Permitted Phases 6 4
Detector Phase 1 6 2 24 4 4
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
14001622A AMBD PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL-110 HOMES Synchro 8 Report
Page 1
YEAR 2019 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES - PROPOSED AM
1: ANDERSON HILL ROAD & KING STREET 120A 1/13/2015
t J
Minimum Split(s) 9.0 9,0 9.0 9.0 9.0 20.0
Total Split(s) 11.0 79.0 68.0 21-0 21.0 20.0
Total Split(%) 9.2% 65.8% 56.7% 17.5% 17.5% 17%
Maximum Green(s) 6.0 74.0 63.0 16.0 16.0 18.0
Yellow Time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 2.0
All-Red Time(s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Lost Time Adjust(s) -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0
Total Lost Time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4-0 4.0
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Recall Mode None Max Max None None None
Walk Time(s) 5.0
Flash Dont Walk(s) 11.0
Pedestrian Calls(#/hr) 0
Act Effct Green(s) 75.1 75.1 64.0 83.2 15.1 15.1
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.76 0.76 0.65 0.85 0.15 0.15
v/c Ratio 0.36 0.70 0.66 0.09 0.65 0.65
Control Delay 5.8 9.7 14.1 1.4 51.2 53.1
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 5.8 9.7 14.1 1.4 51.2 53.1
LOS A A B A D D
Approach Delay 9.2 12.4 52.0
Approach LOS A B D
Queue Length 50th(ft) 21 271 278 8 102 86
Queue Length 95th(ft) 37 407 402 14 170 150
Internal Link Dist(ft) 1176 2569 2635
Turn Bay Length(ft) 75 200 250
Base Capacity(vph) 411 1383 1180 1332 297 252
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.36 0.70 066 0.09 0.58 0.58
p
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length:98.2
Natural Cycle:90
Control Type:Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio:0.70
Intersection Signal Delay: 16,3 Intersection LOS:B
Intersection Capacity Utilization 62.1% ICU Level of Service B
Analysis Period:(min) 15
Sits and Phases: 1:ANDERSON HILL ROAD&KING STREET(120A)
dl 42 A03 �9
liS s .. 20'g
t06
Page 2
YEAR 2019 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES - PROPOSED AM
2: INTERNATIONAL DRIVE & KING STREET 120A 1/13/2015
Lane Configurations t r '� T
Volume(vph) 670 121 286 714 30 78
Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length(ft) 325 450 250 0
Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1
Taper Length(ft) 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Ped Bike Factor 0.97 1.00 0.94 0.92
Frt 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow(prot) 1810 1538 1719 1810 1719 1538
Flt Permitted 0.230 0.950
Satd. Flow(perm) 1810 1496 415 1810 1615 1416
Right Tum on Red No Yes
Satd. Flow(RTOR) 88
Link Speed(mph) 35 35 30
Link Distance(ft) 1949 2649 1520
Travel Time(s) 38.0 51.6 34.5
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10
Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89
Heavy Vehicles(%) 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5%
Adj. Flow(vph) 753 136 321 802 34 88
Shared Lane Traffic(%)
Lane Group Flow(vph) 753 136 321 802 34 88
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right
Median Width(ft) 12 12 12
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Turning Speed(mph) 9 15 15 9
Number of Detectors 0 0 1 0 1 1
Detector Template
Leading Detector(ft) 0 0 50 0 50 50
Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50
Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Cl+Ex C1+Ex
Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Queue(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Turn Type NA pm+ov pm+pt NA Prot Perm
Protected Phases 2 3 1 6 3
Permitted Phases 2 6 3
Detector Phase 2 3 1 6 3 3
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial(s) 5.0 3.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
14001622A_AMBD_PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL- 110 HOMES Synchro 8 Report
Page 3
YEAR 2019 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES - PROPOSED AM
2: INTERNATIONAL DRIVE & KING STREET 120A 111312015
Minimum Split(s) 11,0 9.0 10.0 11.0 9,0 9.0
Total Split(s) 54.0 11.0 20.0 74.0 11.0 11.0
Total Split(%) 63.5% 12,9% 23.5% 87,1% 12.9% 12.9%
Maximum Green(s) 48.0 6.0 14.0 68.0 6.0 6.0
Yellow Time(s) 5.0 4.0 5.0 5,0 4.0 4,0
All-Red Time(s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust(s) -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 •1,0 -1.0
Total Lost Time(s) 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0
Lead/Lag Lag Lead
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension(s) 0.2 3.0 3.0 0.2 3.0 3.0
Recall Mode Max None None Max None None
Act Effct Green(s) 53.1 61.0 69.0 69.0 6.9 6.9
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.63 0.72 0.81 0.81 0.08 0.08
vlc Ratio 0.67 0.13 0.64 0.55 0.24 0.45
Control Delay 14.6 3.4 9.0 4.3 41.2 16.7
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 14.6 3.4 9.0 4.3 41.2 16.7
LOS B A A A D B
Approach Delay 12.9 5.6 23.5
Approach LOS B A C
Queue Length 50th (ft) 225 14 28 101 17 0
Queue Length 95th(ft) 401 34 65 150 45 42
Internal Link Dist(ft) 1869 2569 1440
Turn Bay Length(ft) 325 450 250
Base Capacity(vph) 1130 1078 567 1470 141 197
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced vlc Ratio 0.67 0.13 0.57 0.55 0.24 0.45
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length:85
Actuated Cycle Length:84.9
Natural Cycle:60
Control Type: Semi Act-Uncoord
Maximum vlc Ratio:0.67
Intersection Signal Delay:9.7 Intersection LOS:A
Intersection Capacity Utilization 66.1% ICU Level of Service C
Analysis Period(min) 15
Splits and Phases: 2: INTERNATIONAL DRIVE&KING STREET(120A)
)""01 1 *%* a 2 03
207' 1 054s _Ills
X56
14001622A AMBD PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL-110 HOMES Synchro 8 Report
Page 4
YEAR 2019 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES - PROPOSED PM
1: ANDERSON HILL ROAD & KING STREET (120A) 1/13/2015
E;aiie�,G -
Lane Configurations T �`
Volume(vph) 135 585 768 120 98 217
Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length(ft) 75 200 250 0
Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1
Taper Length(ft) 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Ped Bike Factor 1.00 0.98 0.95
Frt 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow(prot) 1719 1810 1810 1538 1719 1538
Flt Permitted 0.154 0.950
Satd. Flow(perm) 278 1810 1810 1538 1678 1464
Right Turn on Red No No
Satd. Flow(RTOR)
Link Speed(mph) 35 35 30
Link Distance(ft) 1256 2649 2715
Travel Time(s) 24.5 51.6 61.7
Confl. Peds.(#/hr) 10 10 10 10
Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89.1iiM
Heavy Vehicles(%) 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5%
Adj. Flow(vph) 152 657 863 135 110 244
Shared Lane Traffic(%)
Lane Group Flow(vph) 152 657 863 135 110 244
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Left Left Right Left Right
Median Width(ft) 12 12 12
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 100
Turning Speed(mph) 15 9 15 9
Number of Detectors 1
Detector Template
Leading Detector(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50
Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50
Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CH-Ex CI}Ex
Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Queue(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Turn Type pm+pt NA NA pt+ov Prot Perm
Protected Phases 1 6 2 24 d 3
Permitted Phases 6 4
Detector Phase 1 6 2 24 4 4
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
14001622A_PMBD_PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL- 110 HOMES Synchro 8 Report
Page 1
YEAR 2019 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES - PROPOSED PM
1: ANDERSON HILL ROAD & KING STREET 120A 1/13/2015
J� fi /4
Minimum Split(s) 9.0 9.0 9,0 9.0 9.0 20,0
Total Split(s) 10.0 75.0 65.0 25.0 25.0 20.0
Total Split(%) 8.3% 62.5% 54.2% 20.8% 20.8% 17%
Maximum Green(s) 5.0 70.0 60.0 20.0 20.0 18.0
Yellow Time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 2.0
All-Red Time(s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0
Lost Time Adjust(s) -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0
Total Lost Time(s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead .
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension(s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Recall Mode None Max Max None None None
Walk Time(s) 5.0
Flash Dont Walk(s) 11.0
Pedestrian Calls(#/hr) 0 'l
Act Effct Green(s) 71.0 71.0 61.0 85.9 20.9 20.9
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.71 0.71 0.61 0.86 0.21 0.21
v/c Ratio 0.54 0.51 0.78 0.10 0.31 0.80
Control Delay 11.8 8.3 20.8 1.2 36.2 58.1
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 11.8 8.3 20.8 1.2 36,2 58.1
LOS B A C A D E
Approach Delay 8.9 18.2 51.3
Approach LOS A B D
Queue Length 50th(ft) 27 165 378 8 60 149 .,
Queue Length 95th(ft) 45 234 543 15 108 #267
Internal Link Dist(ft) 1176 2569 2635
Turn Bay Length(ft) 75 200 250
Base Capacity(vph) 283 1286 1105 1324 361 307
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.54 0.51 0.78 0.10 030 079
I-
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length: 120
Actuated Cycle Length:99.9 }
Natural Cycle:90
Control Type:Actuated-Uncoordinated
Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.80
Intersection Signal Delay:20.1 Intersection LOS:C _t
Intersection Capacity Utilization 63.3% ICU Level of Service B
Analysis Period(min) 15
# 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity,queue may be longer.
Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. --
Splits and Phases: 1:ANDERSON HILL ROAD&KING STREET(120A)
A) of 4 02 � 3 rs 1Qs 55s z�s
o5
YEAR 2019 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES - PROPOSED PM
2: INTERNATIONAL DRIVE & KING STREET 120A 1/13/2015
RN _ -
-WPM
Lane Configurations t '� t
Volume(vph) 574 41 88 620 140 325
Ideal Flow(vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Storage Length(ft) 325 450 250 0
Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1
Taper Length(ft) 25 25
Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Ped Bike Factor 0.97 1.00 0.98 0.96
Frt 0.850 0.850
Flt Protected 0.950 0.950
Satd. Flow(prot) 1810 1538 1719 1810 1719 1538
Flt Permitted 0.271 0.950
Satd. Flow(perm) 1810 1497 489 1810 1684 1477
Right Tum on Red No Yes
Satd. Flow(RTOR) 295
Link Speed(mph) 35 35 30
Link Distance(ft) 1949 2649 1520
Travel Time(s) 38.0 51.6 34,5
Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 10 10 10 10
Peak Hour Factor 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89
Heavy Vehicles(%) 5% 5% 5% 5% 5% 5%
Adj. Flow(vph) 645 46 99 697 157 365
Shared Lane Traffic(%)
Lane Group Flow(vph) 645 46 99 697 157 365
Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No
Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right
Median Width(ft) 12 12 12
Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0
Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16
Two way Left Turn Lane
Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Turning Speed(mph) 9 15 15 9
Number of Detectors 0 0 1 0 1 1
Detector Template
Leading Detector(ft) 0 0 50 0 50 50
Trailing Detector(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0
Detector 1 Size(ft) 50 50 50 50 50 50
Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex
Detector 1 Channel
Detector 1 Extend(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Queue(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Detector 1 Delay(s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Turn Type NA pm+ov pm+pt NA Prot Perm
Protected Phases 2 3 1 6 3
Permitted Phases 2 6 3
Detector Phase 2 3 1 6 3 3
Switch Phase
Minimum Initial(s) 5.0 3.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
14001622A_PMBD_PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL-110 HOMES Synchro 8 Report
Page 3
YEAR 2019 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES - PROPOSED PM
2: INTERNATIONAL DRIVE & KING STREET 120A 1/13/2015
Minimum Split(s) 11.0 9.0 10,0 11.0 9.0 9.0
Total Split(s) 49.0 25.0 11.0 60.0 25.0 25.0
Total Split(%) 57.6% 29.4% 12.9% 70.6% 29.4% 29.4%
Maximum Green(s) 43.0 20.0 5.0 54.0 20.0 20.0
Yellow Time(s) 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 4,0 4.0
All-Red Time(s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Lost Time Adjust(s) -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0
Total Lost Time(s) 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0
Lead/Lag Lag Lead
Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes
Vehicle Extension(s) 0.2 3.0 3.0 0.2 3.0 3.0
Recall Mode Max None None Max None None
Act Effct Green(s) 46.5 61,4 55.2 55,2 13.9 13,9
Actuated g/C Ratio 0.60 0.79 0.71 0.71 0.18 0.18
v/c Ratio 0.60 0.04 0.23 0.54 0.51 0.72
Control Delay 14.8 1.6 5.7 8.2 34.9 15.8
Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Delay 14.8 1.6 5.7 8.2 34.9 15.8
LOS B A A A C B
Approach Delay 13.9 7.9 21.5
Approach LOS B A C
Queue Length 50th(ft) 189 3 12 128 70 30
Queue Length 95th (ft) 361 7 34 281 123 111
Internal Link Dist(ft) 1869 2569 1440
Turn Bay Length(ft) 325 450 250
Base Capacity(vph) 1078 1291 440 1279 463 614
Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced v/c Ratio 0.60 0.04 0.23 0.54 0.34 059
Area Type: Other
Cycle Length:85
Actuated Cycle Length:78.1
Natural Cycle:60
Control Type: Semi Act-Uncoord
Maximum v/c Ratio:0.72
Intersection Signal Delay: 13.5 Intersection LOS: B
Intersection Capacity Utilization 58.9% ICU Level of Service B
Analysis Period(min) 15
Splits and Phases: 2: INTERNATIONAL DRIVE&KING STREET 020A)
x`41 02 03
l ids049S
[ 25 s
6
14001622A PMBD PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL- 110 HOMES Synchro 8 Report
Page 4
4
Traffic Impact Study
■ Sun Homes at Reckson Executive Park
MASER MC Project No.: 14001622A
C I x I I l T 111 i P. A. Appendix
SUN HOMES AT RECKSON EXECUTIVE PARK
APPENDIX E
COUNT DATA
Maser Consulting
11 Bradhurst Avenue
Hawthorne, NY 1052
Customer Loyalty through Client Satisfaction
File Name : NYS-Route_120A(King_St)_At_Anderson_Hill_Rd_197484_11-13-2014
Site Code
Start Date : 11/13/2014
Page No : 1
_Groups Printed-Lights-_Buses-Trucks
Southbound St. Northbound St. Eastbound St.
From North From South From West
Start Tlme Right Thru U-Turn App Total Thr:; Left U-Tum App.Total Right Left U-Tum App.Total int.Total
07:00 AM 18 86 0 104 119 12 0 131 8 11 0 19 254
07:15 AM 25 137 0 162 136 14 0 150 16 16 0 32 344
07:30 AM 16 131 0 147 159 18 0 177 27 30 0 57 381
07:45 AM 20 125 0 145 209 27 0 236 29 36 0 65 446
Total 79 479 0 558 623 71 0 694 80 93 0 173 1425
08:00 AMI 22 169 0 191 145 33 0 178 1 28 23 0 51 420
08:15 AMI 28 150 0 178 147 43 0 190 33 29 0 62 430
08:30 AM1 16 101 0 117 151 30 0 181 25 28 0 53 351
08:45 AM - 14 115 0 _1.29_ 137 24 0 161 _1_6_ 40 0 56 346
Total 80 535 0 615 580 130 0 710 102 120 0 222 1547
09:00 AM 20 89 0 109 127 23 0 150 16 24 0 40 299
09:15 AM 17 85 0 102 84 11 0 95 23 22 0 45 242
Grand Total 196 1188 0 1384 1414 235 0 1649 221 259 0 480 3513
Apprch% 14.2 85.8 0 85.7 143 0 46 54 0
Total% 5.6 33.8 0 39.4 40.3 6.7 0 46.9 6.3 7.4 0 13.7
Lights 167 1100 0 1267 1314 222 0 1536 195 220 0 415 3218
%Lights 852 92.6 0 91.5 92.9 94 5 0 93.1 88.2 84.9 0 86.5 91.6
Buses 19 54 0 73 55 2 0 57 5 23 0 28 158
%Buses 97 4.5 0 5.3 3.9 0.9 0 3.5 2.3 8.9 0 5.8 4.5
Trucks 10 34 0 44 45 11 0 56 21 16 0 37 137
%Trucks 5 1 2.9 0 3.2 3.2 4.7 0 3.4 9.5 6 2 0 7.7 3.9
Southbound St. Northbound St. Eastbound St.
From North From South From West __
Start Time Right Thru U•Turn App,Total Thru Left U-Tum App.Total Right _Left_'__ U-Turn _ App.Total_, _ Int.Total;
Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 06:30 PM-Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:30 AM
07:30 AMI 16 131 0 147 159 18 0 177 27 30 0 57 1 381
07:45 AM 20 125 0 145 1 209 27 0 236 29 36 0 65 446
08:00 AM 22 169 0 191 145 33 0 178 28 23 0 51 420
28 150_ 0 _1.78.1_ 147 43 0 190 33 29 p 62 430
Total Volume
86 575 0 6611 660 121 0 781 117 118 0 235 1677
%App_Total 13 87 0 84.5 155 0 49.8 50.2 0
PHF .768 _851 _000 _865 .789 .703 .000 .8271 .886 .819 .000 904 .940
Maser Consulting
11 Bradhurst Avenue
Hawthorne, NY 1052
Customer Loyalty through Client Satisfaction
File Name : NYS-Route_120A(King_St)_At_Anderson_Hill_Rd_197484_11-13-2014
Site Code
Start Date : 11/13/2014
Page No : 1
Groups Printed-Lights-Buses-Trucks
Southbound St. Northbound St. Eastbound St.
From north From South From West
Star Tir:-o Right Thru U-Turn App.Total Thru Leff U-Turn App.Total Right Left U-Turn App. Total Int.Total
04:00 PM 29 168 0 197 99 40 0 139 35 23 0 58 394
04:15 PM 21 149 0 170 137 34 0 171 36 19 0 55 396
04:30 PM 24 153 0 177 104 34 0 138 43 21 0 64 379
04:45 PM 30 146 0 176 106 41 0 147 IF 9 14 0 33 356
Total 104 616 0 720 446 149 0 595 133 77 0 210 1525
05:00 PM 19 149 0 168 124 43 0 167 30 26 0 56 391
05:15 PM 26 131 0 157 158 24 0 182 35 23 0 58 397
05:30 PM 22 139 0 161 112 32 0 144 41 18 0 59 364
05:45 PM 18 132 _0 150 110 37 0 147 56 15 0 71 368
Total 85 551 0 636 504 136 0 640 162 82 0 244 1520
06:00 PM 22 169 0 191 91 30 0 121 65 23 0 88 400
06:15 PM 17 99 0 116 85 38 0 123 62 23 0 85 324
Grand Total 228 1435 0 1663 1126 353 0 1479 422 205 0 627 3769
Apprch% 13.7 86.3 0 761 23.9 0 67.3 32.7 0
Total% 6 38.1 0 44.1 29.9 9.4 0 39.2 11-2 5.4 0 16.6
Lights 214 1412 0 1626 1099 343 0 1442 413 196 0 609 3677
%Lights 93.9 984 0 97.8 97.6 97.2 0 97.5 97.9 95.6 0 97.1 97.6
Buses 3 7 0 10 12 2 0 14 3 4 0 7 31
%Buses 1.3 0.5 0 0.6 1.1 0.6 0 0.9 0.7 2 0 1.1 08
Trucks 11 16 0 27 15 8 0 23 6 5 0 11 61
%Trucks 4.8 1.1 0 1.61 1.3 2.3 0 1.6 1.4 2.4 0 1.8 1 6
Southbound St. Northbound St. Eastbound St.
From north _ __ From South From West
Start Time Right Thru U Tum App.Total Thru_ Left U-Tum App.Total Right Leff U-Tum App.Total Int.Total
Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 06:15 PM-Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 05:15 PM
05:15 PM 26 131 0 157 158 24 0 182 35 23 0 58 397
05:30 PM 22 139 0 161 112 32 0 144 41 18 0 59 364
05:45 PM 18 132 0 150 110 37 0 147 56 15 0 71 368
0600 PM 22 169 0 191 91 30 0 121 : 65 23 0 88 400
Total Volume 88 571 0 659 471 123 0 594 197 79 0 276 1529
_App Total 3.4 866 0 79 3 20.7 0 71 4 28.6 0
PHF 1 .846 .845 .004 .863 .745 .831 .000 816 .?58 .859 .000 .784 .956
Maser Consulting
11 Bradhurst Avenue
Hawthorne, NY 1052
File Name : NYS-Route_120A(King_St)_At_International_Dr_197478_11-13-2014
Site Code
Start Date : 11/13/2014
Page No : 1
Groups_Printed-_Lights-Buses-Trucks
Southbound St. Northbound St. Eastbound St
From North From South From Wes[
Start Time Right Thru U-Turn App.Total Thru Lett U-Tu rn App Total Right Left U-Turn App.Total Int.Total
07:00 AM 7 86 0 93 117 7 0 124 3 2 0 5 222
07:15 AM 7 147 0 154 124 21 0 145 4 1 0 5 304
07:30 AM 6 127 0 133 164 19 0 183 3 0 0 3 319
07:45 AM 9 130 0 139 196 32 0 228 3 0 0 3 370
Total ' 29 490 0 519 601 79 0 680 13 3 0 16 1215
08:00 AM 14 193 0 207 153 33 0 186 5 1 0 6 399
08:15 AM 17 159 0 176 136 28 0 164 0 1 0 1 341
08:30 AM 8 104 0 112 125 48 0 173 4 1 0 5 290
08:45 AM 30 116 0 146 129 48 0 177 3 3 _0_ -6_ _ 329
Total ) 69 572 0 641 543 157 0 700 12 6 0 18 1359
09:00 AM 24 95 0 119 108 34 0 142 5 2 0 7 268
09:15 AM 9 92 0 101 86 30 0 116 5 3 0 8 225
Grand Total ; 131 1249 0 1380 1338 300 0 1638 35 14 0 49 3067
Apprch% 1 9.5 90.5 0 81.7 18.3 0 71.4 28.6 0
Total% 4.3 40.7 0 45 43.6 98 0 53.4 1.1 0.5 0 1.6
Lights 130 1140 0 1270 1219 294 0 1513 29 11 0 40 2823
%Lights 99.2 91.3 0 92 91.1 98 0 92.4 82.9 78.6 0 81.5 92
Buses 0 73 0 73 79 3 0 82 3 3 0 6 161
%Buses ' 0 5.8 0 5.3 5.9 1 0 5 8.6 21.4 0 12.2_ 5.2
Trucks ) 1 36 0 37 40 3 0 43 3 0 0 3 83
%Trucks 0.8 2.9 0 2.7 3 1 0 2.6 8.6 0 0 6.1 2.7
Southbound St. Northbound St. Eastbound St
From North _ From South From West
Start Time Right Thru U-Turn App.Total Thru Lefty U-Turn App.Total: Right Left U Turn App,Total Int.Total
Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 09:15 AM-Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:30 AM
07:30 AM 6 127 0 133 164 19 0 183 3 0 0 3 319
07:45 AM 9 130 0 139 196 32 0 228 3 0 0 3 370
08:00 AM 14 193 0 207 153 33 0 186 5 1 0 6 399
08:15 AM 17 159 0 176 136 28 0 164 0 1 0 1 _ 341
Total Volume 46 609 0 655 649 112 0 761 11 2 0 13 1429
%o_Apo._Total 7 93 0 85 3 14.7 0 84.6 15.4 0
.PHF .676 .789 000 .791 .828 848 00'0 .834 550 500 000 .542 .895
Maser Consulting
11 Bradhurst Avenue
Hawthorne, NY 1052
Customer Loyalty through Client Satisfaction
File Name : NYS-Route_120A(King_St)_At_lnternational_Dr_197478_11-13-2014
Site Code
Start Date : 11/13/2014
Page No : 1
Groups Printed-Lights-Buses-Trucks
Southbound St. Northbound St. Eastbound St.
From North From South From West
Start-
Time_. _--Right__ _ Thru U-Turn App.Total Thru Left U-Turn App,Total Right Left U-Tum App,Total Int.Total
04:00 PM 1 171 0 172 114 3 0 117 11 7 0 18 307
04:15 PM 1 150 0 151 142 2 0 144 14 5 0 19 314
04:30 PM 0 156 0 156 120 3 0 123 17 5 0 22 301
04:45 PM5 136 0 141-I_ -- 107 2 0 109,__ 27 13_ -0_ 40 290
Total 7 613 0 6201 483 10 0 4931, 69 30 0 99 1212
05:00 PM 1 0 135 0 135 118 1 0 119 44 22 0 66 320
05:15 PM 1 121 0 122 216 4 1 221 38 10 0 48 391
05:30 PM 0 130 0 130 123 2 0 125 38 19 0 57 312
05:45 PM ' 3 130 0 133 115 3 0 1181 _ 22 9 0 31 282
Total 4 516 0 520 572 10 1 5831 142 60 0 202 1305
MOO PM 0 148 0 148 95 4 0 99 28 10 0 38 285
06:15 PM 0 107 0 107 99 4 0 103 15 5 0 20 230
Grand Total 11 1384 0 1395 1249 28 1 1278 254 105 0 359 3032
Apprch% 0.8 99.2 0 977 2.2 01 70.8 29.2 0
Total% 0.4 45.6 0 46 41 2 0.9 0 42.2 8.4 3.5 0 11.8
Lights 8 1359 0 1367 1225 27 1 1253 247 103 0 350 2970
•Lights 72.7 98.2 0 98 98.1 96.4 100 98 97.2 98.1 0 97.5 98
Buses 2 11 0 13 12 0 0 12 6 0 0 6 31
%Buses 18.2 0.8 0 0.9 1 0 0 0.9 2.4 0 0 1.7 1
Trucks 1 14 0 15 12 1 0 13 1 2 0 3 31
%Trucks 9.1 1 0 1.1 1 3 6 0 1 0.4 1.9 0 0.8 1
Southbound St. Northbound St. Eastbound St.
From North __._ _ _ From South _ From West
Start Time Ri ht
Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to06:1
l - Thru -- U-Turn _App.Total _ Thru __Left_ U-T urn1 App._Total Right Left U-Turn App.Total Int,Total
5 PM-Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:45 PM
04:45 PM :1 5 136 0 141 107 2 0 109 27 13 0 40 290
05:00 PM 0 135 0 135 118 1 0 119 44 22 0 66 320
05:15 PM 1 121 0 122 216 4 1 221 38 10 0 48 391
5 - ---- -0-- 130 0 134 123 2. 0 125 -- ----- 3$---- -19- ---- -0-----------57 312
Total Volume 6 522 0 528 564 9 1 574 147 64 0 211 1313
- Total -- - - -- -0.2-- - - - -
o_
App._oto . 1.1 _ 98.9 0 98.3 -1.6 -_ �____6.9.7 30.3 0
PHF 300 .960 000 .936_ 653 563 250 649 _.835 727 .000 .799 .840
February 24, 2015R-3
RESOLUTION
ADOPTING LOCAL ADJUSTMENTS FOR HOMESTEAD AND
NON-HOMESTEAD BASE PROPORTIONS
WHEREAS, on January 25, 2005 the Board of Trustees adopted Local Law
#2-2005 relating to the adoption of the provisions of Section 1903 of the Real
Property Tax Law regarding Homestead Base Proportions; and
WHEREAS, the Town of Rye Assessor has prepared Homestead and Non-
Homestead base proportions for the Village of Rye Brook; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees of the Village of Rye Brook wishes to
adopt local adjustments to these base proportions, that will be used to establish a
Homestead tax rate and a Non-Homestead tax rate for the 2015-2016 Village Budget
and tax rates.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Trustees of the
Village of Rye Brook hereby adopts for the 2015-16 Village tax, Homestead Base
Proportions of 69.952839% and Non-Homestead base proportions of 30.047161%;
and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Mayor and Village Administrator
are authorized to sign all necessary documents to implement the purposes of this
resolution; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Town Assessor and Tax Collector
are authorized and directed to make any filings on behalf of Rye Brook, and to take
any additional actions necessary to implement the purposes of this resolution.
February 24, 2015 R-4
RESOLUTION
CONSIDERING THE APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
JANUARY 29, 2015
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Village of Rye Brook Board of
Trustees hereby certifies the approval of the minutes for the meetings held on
January 29, 2015 and February 10, 2015.