Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2006-02-14 - Board of Trustees Meeting Minutes REGULAR MEETING VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK BOARD OF TRUSTEES MEETING VILLAGE HALL, 938 KING STREET TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 14, 2006-7:30 P.M AGENDA ROLL CALL PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1) Consideration of modifications to approved site plans for Reckson Executive Park, Phases 1 and 2, to install emergency generators. 2) Consideration of a revised site plan and special use permit to install fuel storage tanks for a new maintenance facility at the Blind Brook Club, 980 Anderson Hill Road. RESOLUTIONS: 1) Approving modifications to approved site plans for Reckson Executive Park, Phases 1 and 2, to install emergency generators. 2) Approving a revised site plan and special use permit to install fuel storage tanks for a new maintenance facility at the Blind Brook Club, 980 Anderson Hill Road. 3) Setting a public hearing date to consider a proposed local law to amend Chapter 250 of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook regarding notification requirements. 4) Setting a public hearing date to consider a proposed local law to add Chapter 123 of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook regarding filming. 5) Approving the 2006 Stop DWI agreement between Westchester County and the Village of Rye Brook. 6) Authorizing the submission of a NYS Home Rule Request for a speed limit reduction on King Street ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT Board of Trustee Meeting February 14,2006 Page 1 of 15 OLD BUSINESS NEW BUSINESS DISCUSSION ITEMS • Upzoning for the Byram Ridge area. ACTION ON NON-AGENDA MATTERS SUBJECT TO THE CONSENT OF THE TRUSTEES PRESENT AT THE MEETING NEXT TRUSTEES MEETINGS: February 28, 2006 and March 14, 2006 BOARD Mayor Lawrence Rand Trustee Richard Buzin Trustee Michael Brown Trustee Joan Feinstein Trustee Paul Rosenberg STAFF: Christopher Bradbury, Village Administrator Edward Beane, Esq., Village Counsel Victor Carosi, Village Engineer Marilyn Timpone Mohamed, Village Consultant Theodore Sabato, Chief of Police Fred Seifert, Public Access Coordinator Paula Patafio, Meeting Secretary Excused: Keith Rang, Assistant to the Village Administrator Mayor Rand called the meeting to order starting with the Pledge of Allegiance led by Marilyn Timpone-Mohamed, Village Consultant. Mayor Rand welcomed everyone to the regular meeting of the Board of Trustees on February 14, 2006 -- Valentine's Day. He called for the first item on the agenda. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1) CONSIDERATION OF MODIFICATIONS TO APPROVED SITE PLANS FOR RECKSON EXECUTIVE PARK, PHASES 1 AND 2, TO INSTALL EMERGENCY GENERATORS. Mr. Bradbury summarized this public hearing for the Board and members of the public. He noted that this is an application from Reckson Park, Phases I and II, to install emergency generators. This matter has been before several Village Boards for review. Board of Trustee Meeting February 14,2006 Page 2 of 15 Discussed in detail were emissions and noise levels. The Village's Planning Board has referred the matter to the Board of Trustees, and has recommended approval of the application. On a motion made by Trustee Joan Feinstein, and seconded by Trustee Richard Buzin, the public hearing was declared open. Daniel Tartaglia, Esq., legal representative for Reckson Executive Park, addressed the Board. Prior to beginning the discussion on this matter, Mr. Tartaglia gave a brief presentation and update on the Phase III site plan. In regard to the application before the Board at this meeting, Mr. Tartaglia noted that there were a couple of features of the history of this application that needed to be noted. He pointed out that this application evolved. When Reckson purchased the office park there was one tenant there, Market Data, that had a generator on site. This generator had a Certificate of Occupancy. Subsequent to that, when Reckson purchased the office park, another tenant moved in — Commerce Bank — and they requested the installation of an emergency back-up generator. Reckson went to the Village's Building Department and submitted an application for a building permit. The Building Permit was received, and the generator was installed next to the Market Data generator. This installation received a Certificate of Occupancy. Subsequent to that installation, another tenant moved in and they applied for a Building Permit to install a back-up generator. They were granted a Building Permit, installed the generator, and received a Certificate of Occupancy. A fourth tenant that Reckson was negotiating with, Oak Hill, also requested permission to install a back-up generator. During this application process, the Building Department reviewed the matter and decided that these were improvements and that Reckson needed to amend the site plan. The Building Department and Reckson went back and forth on this matter. At that same time Reckson was working with the Village on the Phase III extension. It was decided that Reckson should make an application to the Village for the installation of these generators, and that the Village take a more global look at what was being done. This review will include future tenants, and what the whole picture would look like. The site plan application was amended and reviewed at the Planning Board level. The Planning Board has given the applicant some very good input on this matter, and now the application has been referred back to the Board of Trustees. Mr. Tartaglia turned the presentation over to Mr. Jerry Schwabe, Civil Engineer for the applicant. Mr. Schwabe began his presentation by reviewing the site plan application submitted for Phase I and Phase IL In Phase I there are two sites for the generators. These sites have been chosen to minimize the impacts. The site for Phase 11 has also been chosen with impacts in mind, and the surrounding neighbors. The generators will be sufficiently screened. In addition, Reckson intends to relocate the dumpsters that are currently located near Bellefair in response to concerns expressed by the neighbors. The dumpsters will be moved interior to the site, in the parking lot. During the discussions with the Planning Board, the question of disturbance from the noise level if all of the generators were tested at the same time was a main issue. The Board of Trustee Meeting February 14,2006 Page 3 of 15 noise levels were monitored. Each generator's noise level was monitored as a single generator, and then they were monitored as a whole. It is important to note that the only time the generators would run all night would be in the case of an emergency. The testing of the generators will be done once a week, and the Village has proposed time limitations for testing. Mr. Schwabe stated that it was found that if all of the generators are turned on at the same time, they do not exceed the national standards for emissions. In addition to reviewing each generator for emissions, all of the manufacturers' specifications were also reviewed. The Village referred this matter to its own consultants for review. After completing their review, a request was made for additional landscaping, screening, and some beautification around the area to reduce the impact to the neighbors. The Village's consultant noted that the noise levels were monitored to find out what it is like when it is quiet, on a typical day, with no generators. She reminded everyone that this location is very close to the airport. Next each generator was turned on one-by-one, and the noise levels were monitored for each one. And, finally, all the generators were turned on at the same time and the noise levels were monitored. Based on this information and the manufacturers' specification a study was done keeping in mind that the noise level is lessened when inside of the home, and that people are entitled to the use and enjoyment of their property as well. The decibel levels reached were 65 during the day and 55 at night,however, it is important to remember that this level would be reached only in an emergency, with all generators running. The testing will be once a week, an hour per tenant, weekdays only between 10:00 a.m, to 4:00 p.m. There are only two areas that the noise level could potentially be higher. One is near the golf course, and the other is near a walking trail. The next review was of the emissions of the generators. The emissions for each generator was taken into consideration. The emissions were found to be below the national standards. It was noted that the national standards will be changed in a couple of years. Trustee Paul Rosenberg questioned whether the emissions should be calculated individually or as one specific unit. The response was each generator should be reviewed as an individual. Trustee Joan Feinstein questioned what the recourse by Reckson would have if the tenant exceeds the threshold. Mr. Tartagalia noted that in every lease there is language that requires that the tenant follows all applicable laws and regulations. This includes EPA and NYS regulations. Trustee Feinstein noted that a recommendation has been made for the hours that the generators could be tested. She asked if it was feasible to limit the testing of generators to certain days of the weeks as well as the hours. Mr. Tartagalia noted that each tenant has their own requirements for testing of their generator. It would be problematic for the tenants to coordinate the testing. He noted that there are four different locations for the generators, therefore the noise impacts are not in the same zone. Board of Trustee Meeting February 14,2006 Page 4 of 15 Trustee Rosenberg noted that he and Trustee Michael Brown were present when all the generators were started up during a test. They found that the noise level was not really that bad. The Planning Board has recommended restricting times for testing the generators. Trustee Rosenberg suggested that the times be restricted even further. He agreed that one day per week would be too limiting, but suggested three days out of the week. It was noted that one of the tenants tests its generator monthly and not weekly. It was also the applicant's feeling that limiting the testing to several days during the week would not be a problem. Mr. Tartaglia reminded the Board that this is a comprehensive application for the existing generators, one request that is pending, and additional generators that may never be installed. Mayor Rand noted that a future Board could amend the days and times slotted for testing the generators. Mr. Tartaglia noted that Reckson has found that every tenant that has considered moving into this office park has requested back-up generators. Trustee Feinstein suggested limiting the testing of the generators to three days per week: Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday. Required maintenance is not included in the testing of the generators. Trustee Brown noted that he was actually surprised when he was in attendance at the testing of the generators at how quiet they really are. He also felt that each generator should be tested only once per week, and agreed with the time restrictions. Mr. Tartaglia noted that the oldest generator is tested once a month. Reckson feels that it can convince the tenant with the oldest generator to replace it. If not, then Reckson will add sound shielding around it. Reckson agreed to provide some mitigation for this generator within 12 months. A resident of Bellefair addressed the Board. He noted that there were several meetings between Reckson and the Bellefair residents on this matter. At the meetings the noise from the garbage compactor was discussed. Reckson has now agreed to move the compactor, although no date has been set. He felt that Reckson has the resources to move the generators and the garbage compactors in order to mitigate the noise, which is bothersome to the adjacent Bellefair residents. He asked that the Board review this matter in great detail and require mitigation. There being no further comments or questions, Mayor Rand called for a motion to close the public hearing. On a motion made by Trustee Buzin, and seconded by Trustee Rosenberg, the public hearing was closed. TRUSTEE BROWN VOTING AYE TRUSTEE BUZIN VOTING AYE TRUSTEE FEINSTEIN VOTING AYE Board of Trustee Meeting February 14,2006 Page 5 of 15 TRUSTEE ROSENBERG VOTING AYE MAYOR RAND VOTING AYE Mayor Rand called for the resolution on this matter. 1) APPROVING MODIFICATIONS TO APPROVED SITE PLANS FOR RECKSON EXECUTIVE PARK, PHASES 1 AND 2, TO INSTALL EMERGENCY GENERATORS. Mr. Bradbury read the resolution. RESOLUTION APPROVING MODIFICATIONS TO APPROVED SITE PLANS FOR RECKSON EXECUTIVE PARK, PHASES 1 AND 2, TO INSTALL EMERGENCY GENERATORS WHEREAS, Reckson Operating Partnership, L.P. ("Reckson") is the owner of certain property located at 1100 King Street, Rye Brook, New York, which property also is commonly known as "Reckson Executive Park;" and WHEREAS, Reckson has made an application to the Board of Trustees of the Village of Rye Brook for modifications to approved site plans to install generators in Phase 1 and Phase 2 of Reckson Executive Park; and WHEREAS, the Village Board of Trustees is the Approval Authority for modification of the approved site plans in accordance with § 209-1(A)(1) of the Village Code; and WHEREAS, the Village Board of Trustees pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA), and after review of the Environmental Assessment Form (EAF) and supporting documents prepared by the Applicant classified the project as a Type II Action that requires no further review under SEQRA; and WHEREAS, the Village Board of Trustees referred the subject application to the Westchester County Department of Planning for the purpose of notification only, and the Village Planning Board for review and comment on June 28, 2005 and the Village Planning Board recommended approval of the modified site plans subject to conditions on January 12, 2006; and WHEREAS, the Village Board of Trustees reviewed the information submitted by the Applicant in connection with the application, the reports and recommendations of the Village Planning Consultant, the Village Engineering Consultant and Village staff and the recommendations of the Village Planning Board regarding the site plan, zoning, landscape plan, disturbance of steep slopes, operational parameters with respect to health and safety issues, noise Board of Trustee Meeting February 14,2006 Page 6 of 15 and air quality, permit requirements and regulatory compliance and the Applicant revised the site plan according to the recommendations; and WHEREAS, the Village Board of Trustees is familiar with the site and all aspects of the project; and WHEREAS, the site plan was revised to reduce noise impacts to surrounding residential properties and sufficient and adequate screening of new and existing generators is proposed to reduce the visual impacts of such generators. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Village of Rye Brook Board of Trustees hereby approves the modified site plans to install generators in Phase 1 and Phase 2 of Reckson Executive Park subject to the following conditions: 1. That tenants shall be required to test generators not more than one time per week per generator on Tuesdays, Wednesdays and Thursdays between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., business days only. 2. That the number of required parking spaces shall be reduced by eleven (11) spaces to provide a new location for Generator Set No. 5 west of Building 4 and relocation of a trash compactor adjacent to the western most curb of the parking area west of Building 4 (Phase 2) within ninety (90) days of the date of this resolution. 3. That exhaust from any new generator shall be directed away from residential areas. 4. That the owners of the generators will comply with all applicable U.S. Department of Environmental Protection, New York State and Westchester County air quality requirements. 5. Within twelve (12) months of the date of this resolution, Generator one (1) shall be upgraded to a more state of the art generator or retrofitted with noise mitigation structures or equipment subject to the approval of the Village Engineer. 6. That all new generators shall not exceed the noise levels specified in the report titled "Reckson Executive Park Air Quality and Noise Evaluation of Proposed Generators Rye Brook, NY" revised December 22, 2005, prepared by Sandstone Environmental Associates, Inc. and that a revised Table 7, "Future Noise Levels (dBA) at Property Line" in the report shall be added to the Site Plans. Noise levels at PL1 and the Stonegate Apartments and Table 7 shall be revised as indicated in the "Noise and Air Quality Evaluation Review Comments," dated January 11, 2006, prepared by HDR/LMS. Board of Trustee Meeting February 14,2006 Page 7 of 15 The Board reviewed the resolution, and requested changes that were deemed as not being substantial. The Board discussed the not to exceed level for noise impacts of the garbage compactor and the oldest generator. Mr. Carosi, Village Engineer, noted that item #6 of the resolution gives the Village an identifiable quantity of noise generation so that future use can be monitored. Mr. Bradbury noted that if the original generator was replaced it would be replaced with a quieter generator. A timeframe for the replacement or mitigation was set by amending the resolution. On a motion made by Trustee Rosenberg, and seconded by Trustee Brown, the resolution was adopted as amended. TRUSTEE BROWN VOTING AYE TRUSTEE BUZIN VOTING AYE TRUSTEE FEINSTEIN VOTING AYE TRUSTEE ROSENBERG VOTING AYE MAYOR RAND VOTING AYE 2) CONSIDERATION OF A REVISED SITE PLAN AND SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO INSTALL FUEL STORAGE TANKS FOR A NEW MAINTENANCE FACILITY AT THE BLIND BROOK CLUB, 980 ANDERSON HILL ROAD. Mr. Bradbury noted that the applicant was before the Board requesting a modification to the site plan and special use permit. The applicant was requesting that two above-ground fuel source tanks for the Blind Brook Club be moved. On a motion made by Trustee Rosenberg, and seconded by Trustee Brown, the public hearing was declared open. Mr. Robert Stantziel, Project Architect for the Blind Brook project, addressed the Board. He noted that the fuel tank locations had been approved, but for Code reasons they could not be located where intended. Therefore, the applicant is now before the Board requesting a site plan amendment. The applicant is proposing relocating these tanks to the corner of the parking facility. This matter has been presented to the Planning Board, and its recommendation to the Board of Trustees was approval. Mayor Rand called from questions from members of the public, and comments from Board members. There being none, he called for a motion to close the public hearing. On a motion made by Trustee Rosenberg, and seconded by Trustee Buzin, the public hearing was closed. Board of Trustee Meeting February 14,2006 Page 8 of 15 TRUSTEE BROWN VOTING AYE TRUSTEE BUZIN VOTING AYE TRUSTEE FEINSTEIN VOTING AYE TRUSTEE ROSENBERG VOTING AYE MAYOR RAND VOTING AYE Mayor Rand called for the resolution on this matter. 2) APPROVING A REVISED SITE PLAN AND SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO INSTALL FUEL STORAGE TANKS FOR A NEW MAINTENANCE FACILITY AT THE BLIND BROOK CLUB, 980 ANDERSON HILL ROAD. Mr. Bradbury read the resolution: RESOLUTION APPROVING A REVISED SITE PLAN AND SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO INSTALL FUEL STORAGE TANKS FOR A NEW MAINTENANCE FACILITY AT THE BLIND BROOK CLUB, 980 ANDERSON HILL ROAD WHEREAS, the Blind Brook Club was granted site plan, special use permit, and wetlands permit approval on June 22, 2004 to construct a new maintenance facility on their property at 980 Anderson Hill Road, Section 1, Block 4, Lot 1 in the R-20/Z-1 Zoning District; and WHEREAS, on December 29, 2005 the Blind Brook Club submitted applications to amend the previously approved site plan and special use permit to change the proposed location of two above-ground fuel storage tanks to a location that will comply with the New York State Building Code; and WHEREAS, the Village of Rye Brook Board of Trustees, pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA), reviewed the Environmental Assessment Form (EAF)prepared by the Applicant and determined the proposed action to be a Type 2 Action requiring no further review under SEQRA; and WHEREAS, on January 10, 2006 the Village Board of Trustees referred the applications to the Planning Board and the Planning Board referred the applications back to the Village Board on January 12, 2006 with a recommendation to approve the revised site plan and special use permit; and WHEREAS, the Village Board of Trustees has reviewed the information submitted by the applicant in connection with the applications and the recommendations of Village consultants and Village staff; and Board of Trustee Meeting February 14,2006 Page 9 of 15 WHEREAS, the Village Board of Trustees is familiar with the site and all aspects of the project; and WHEREAS, no changes to approved environmental permits are proposed and the proposed changes comply with the regulations of the SROD and Chapter 209 regarding site plan requirements; and WHEREAS, the new location of the fuel storage tanks would comply with the requirements of the New York State Building Code. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Village of Rye Brook Board of Trustees determines that the proposed amendments to the approved site plan and special use permit are minor in nature; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Village Board of Trustees hereby approves the amended special use permit and site plan to change the proposed location of two above-ground fuel storage tanks for a new maintenance facility at the Blind Brook Club. On a motion made by Trustee Rosenberg, and seconded by Trustee Feinstein, the resolution was adopted. TRUSTEE BROWN VOTING AYE TRUSTEE BUZIN VOTING AYE TRUSTEE FEINSTEIN VOTING AYE TRUSTEE ROSENBERG VOTING AYE MAYOR RAND VOTING AYE 3) SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING DATE TO CONSIDER A PROPOSED LOCAL LAW TO AMEND CHAPTER 250 OF THE CODE OF THE VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK REGARDING NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS. Mr. Bradbury read the resolution. RESOLUTION SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING DATE TO CONSIDER A PROPOSED LOCAL LAW TO AMEND CHAPTER 250 OF THE CODE OF THE VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK REGARDING NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS Board of Trustee Meeting February 14,2006 Page 10 of 15 WHEREAS, a local law has been proposed to amending Chapter 250 of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook regarding notification requirements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Trustees of the Village of Rye Brook shall hold a public hearing on February 28, 2006 at 7:30 p.m., at Village Hall, 938 King Street, Rye Brook, New York to consider a proposed local law to amend Chapter 250 to the Code of the Village of Rye Brook regarding notification requirements. On a motion made by Trustee Feinstein, and seconded by Trustee Buzin, the resolution was adopted. TRUSTEE BROWN VOTING AVE TRUSTEE BUZIN VOTING AYE TRUSTEE FEINSTEIN VOTING AYE TRUSTEE ROSENBERG VOTING AYE MAYOR RAND VOTING AYE 4) SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING DATE TO CONSIDER A PROPOSED LOCAL LAW TO ADD CHAPTER 123 OF THE CODE OF THE VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK REGARDING FILMING. Mr. Bradbury read the resolution. RESOLUTION SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING DATE TO CONSIDER A PROPOSED LOCAL LAW TO ADD CHAPTER 123 OF THE CODE OF THE VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK REGARDING FILMING WHEREAS, a local law has been proposed to add Chapter 123 of the Code of the Village of Rye Brook regarding filming. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Trustees of the Village of Rye Brook shall hold a public hearing on February 28, 2006 at 7:30 p.m., at Village Hall, 938 King Street, Rye Brook, New York to consider a proposed local law to add Chapter 123 to the Code of the Village of Rye Brook regarding filming. Board of Trustee Meeting February 14,2006 Page 11 of 15 On a motion made by Trustee Buzin, and seconded by Trustee Rosenberg, the resolution was adopted. Trustee Feinstein felt that the permit fees should be set so that they could be discussed during the public hearing. Mr. Bradbury noted that a resolution will be added to amend the Village's license and permit fees. TRUSTEE BROWN VOTING AYE TRUSTEE BUZIN VOTING AYE TRUSTEE FEINSTEIN VOTING AYE TRUSTEE ROSENBERG VOTING AYE MAYOR RAND VOTING AYE 5) APPROVING THE 2006 STOP DWI AGREEMENT BETWEEN WESTCHESTER COUNTY AND THE VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK. Mr. Bradbury read the resolution. RESOLUTION APPROVING THE 2006 STOP DWI AGREEMENT BETWEEN WESTCHESTER COUNTY AND THE VILLAGE OF RYE BROOK RESOLVED, that the Village of Rye Brook is authorized to enter into the 2006 Stop DWI Patrol Project Reimbursement Contract with Westchester County for reimbursement of overtime and added patrol costs to enforce DWI/DWAI laws in the amount not to exceed $8,400.00; and it is further RESOLVED, that the Mayor is authorized to execute and deliver all documents necessary and appropriate to accomplish the purposes of this resolution. On a motion made by Trustee Feinstein, and seconded by Trustee Buzin, the resolution was adopted. TRUSTEE BROWN VOTING AYE TRUSTEE BUZIN VOTING AYE TRUSTEE FEINSTEIN VOTING AYE Board of Trustee Meeting February 14,2006 Page 12 of 15 TRUSTEE ROSENBERG VOTING AYE MAYOR RAND VOTING AYE 6) AUTHORIZING THE SUBMISSION OF A NEW YORK STATE HOME RULE REQUEST FOR A SPEED LIMIT REDUCTION ON KING STREET Mr. Bradbury read the resolution. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE SUBMISSION OF A NYS HOME RULE REQUEST FOR A SPEED LIMIT REDUCTION ON KING STREET WHEREAS, the Village of Rye Brook desires to change the current speed limit on route 120-A (King Street) from 35 mph to 30 mph; and WHEREAS, NYS Assemblyman George Latimer has introduced NYS legislation to the Assembly with bill number A.9520, and NYS Senator Suzi Oppenheimer has introduced NYS legislation to the Senate with bill number 5.6637; and WHEREAS, this legislation requires the passage of a Home Rule Request to the NYS Senate and NYS Assembly by the Village of Rye Brook. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Trustees of the Village of Rye Brook hereby approves the submission of a Home Rule Request to the NYS Senate and Assembly for bill numbers S.6637 and A.9520 that would authorize and empower the Village of Rye Brook to lower the speed limit on route 120-A (King Street) to 30 miles; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Mayor is authorized to submit the Home Rule Request and execute and deliver all necessary documents to NYS. On a motion made by Trustee Buzin, and seconded by Trustee Rosenberg, the resolution was adopted. TRUSTEE BROWN VOTING AYE TRUSTEE BUZIN VOTING AYE TRUSTEE FEINSTEIN VOTING AYE TRUSTEE ROSENBERG VOTING AYE MAYOR RAND VOTING AYE Board of Trustee Meeting February 14,2006 Page 13 of 15 ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: Mr. Bradbury took a moment to thank the Public Works Department for the great job during the most recent storm on snow removal. Mr. Bradbury gave a brief update on ongoing projects in the Village. He reviewed the status of the athletic fields. Next to be addressed was the fire on Parkwood. The Fire Advisory Board and the Fire Chief have reviewed this issue to make sure that the response times were on target, and that procedures were followed. Upon completion of his report he noted that overall response time was good. He has made some suggestions to areas that could be improved, and has updated the procedures. A report was received from the Ridge Street School regarding an unidentified individual on school grounds. The police department was called in, the individual was identified, and the police are taking appropriate action. The New York State Department of Transportation has been reviewing King Street traffic and has made some suggestions for short-term improvements. Review is continuing with a long-term resolution as the goal. Mr. Bradbury announced that the Village elections were scheduled for March 21, 2006. He noted that the Village Clerk has received a petition from Rye Brook Together nominating Mayor Lawrence Rand, Trustee Joan Feinstein, and Patricia Romano for Trustee. The Village has received the audit for the 2004-2005 year. This will be reviewed by the Finance Advisory Board and the Board of Trustees. Trustee Richard Buzin noted, for those residents that live in the Port Chester School District portion of Rye Brook, that the vote scheduled for Thursday was on a very important issue. This bond is needed to do essential electrical and roofing repairs at the schools. This money will need to be spent whether or not this bond is passed. If this bond does not pass the Port Chester residents could be looking at an approximate 18%increase. He urged all residents to vote. DISCUSSION ITEMS Upzoning for the Byram Ridge Area Board of Trustee Meeting February 14,2006 Page 14 of 15 Trustee Feinstein noted that there has been a lot of development, teardowns, and refurbishing of homes in Rye Brook, and particularly in the Byram Ridge area. In order to preserve the character of the Byram Ridge area she suggested upzoning. She asked that the Board revisit what has happened in this area over the last couple of years and consider ways to preserve the character of this area. These are larger homes, on larger parcels. Mr. Bradbury stated that he would discuss this matter with the Village's Consultant, Marilyn Timpone Mohamed, and then report back to the Board. Mayor Rand noted that the next Trustee Meetings were scheduled for February 28, 2006 and March 14, 2006. Mayor Rand called for comments from members of the public wishing to address the Board. Mr. Dom Cervi of Dixon Street questioned when the parking regulation signs would be installed restricting parking around Dixon Street. He noted that there were serious safety conditions on these streets. Mr. Bradbury noted that the signs have arrived, but the weather has restricted the installation. Mr. Cervi suggested that the vendor for the signs was taking too long to make the signs, and perhaps the Village should look for another vendor. Trustee Buzin agreed with Mr. Cervi, as did Mayor Rand. Mr. Bradbury was directed to research other vendors. Mr. Cervi brought up a second matter for discussion. He noted that last week a truck unhooked the cab and left its trailer on Dixon Street. This is a residential area in Rye Brook and this truck with Alabama plates was left parked in the street for several days. Chief Theodore Sabato noted that he was unaware of the complaint, however, he noted that a trailer cannot be parked on public streets overnight. He stated that he would look into this matter. Mayor Rand noted that the Board of Trustees would hold an Executive Session directly after the Board of Trustees meeting. There being no further business before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at 9:30 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, Christopher J. Bradbury, Village Administrator/Clerk Board of Trustee Meeting February 14,2006 Page 15 of 15